Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBatch 1617 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:29 PM To:Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Hermann, Greg; McDonald, Whitney; Wallace, Christine; Szentesi, Whit Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO FYI, I am planning on including a version of the statement and the attachment as a staff agenda correspondence to the PC for the hearing this evening, as the grand jury report was submitted by a member of the public as a comment, and I think its best for the PC to have this information. We will also be clear with PC this evening that the item at hand, and up for discussion, is the CUP for a specific property, not the grand jury report. Thanks, Timmi From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:15 PM To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Agreed, well done, and a fair tone down of the CA뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:58 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Very very well done team! Thank you for the time, effort, and professionalism in getting out truthful and accurate information to our community who deserve so much better. PD thanks you뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Thank you, Rick Scott Police Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E rscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7256 18 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:40 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Importance: High BCC: City Council Mayor and Council Members, Please see the response that was provided to the New Times below. We will also be working on a communication plan to share additional information with the public and media through the formal response to the Grand Jury. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. 19 If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 30 From:Scott, Rick Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:49 PM To:Amoroso, Brian Subject:Grand Jury Media Response Attachments:20250620_City of SLO Memo to GJ_Town & Gown.pdf Importance:High Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. Thank you, Rick Scott Police Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E rscott@slocity.org T 805.781.7256 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 31 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:45 PM To:Amoroso, Brian Subject:RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Thanks, Brian. Let me think about that…appreciate it! Timmi From: Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:40 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Hi Timmi, I see Mr. Walker submitted the Grand Jury report to the Planning Commission. See you tonight. Brian Brian Amoroso Deputy Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E bamoroso@slocity.org T 805.594.8016 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 32 From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:59 AM To: Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Cc: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: FW: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Hi Brian, You might want to look at Kathie’s comment that is in the link below – she raises specific issues/questions about who responds to certain types of noise calls in PD…just want you to be aware in case questions come up about it. Thanks, Timmi From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:33 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker, K. (2) - Reeves Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 35 From:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:34 PM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Planning Commission 6.25.25 - Item 4a Date: June 25, 2025 To: Advisory Bodies Subject: Planning Commission, Item 4a Dear Chairman Houghton and Planning Commissioners, By way of introduction, my name is Mila Vujovich-La Barre. In addition to being a resident of the “Neighborhoods North of Foothill" and a teacher in the San Luis Coastal Unified School District for the last 41 years, I am also a member of the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC). One of the major goals of the SCLC is to constantly enhance “town-gown” relationships. Over the last few years, the melding of college students in residential neighborhoods has been a common topic. Several students do an outstanding job of thriving and embracing their neighborhoods and our community as a whole. The members of the Delta Upsilon Fraternity have quite simply failed to demonstrate this concept. After due consideration and review, it is my hope that you revoke Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit based on continual noise complaints and citations, and the fact that they have not followed the conditions of their Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The site of their fraternity has been the cause for innumerable noise complaints, which have involved our hardworking police force. Delta Upsilon members have displayed a lack of respect for city residents by continuing to host noisy events with excessive numbers of attendees at their main and satellite houses, despite being given multiple verbal and written warnings, noise citations, and notices of violation. Many students who are accepted into California Polytechnic University (Cal Poly) are indeed among the top scholars in the country. This leads me to believe that the Delta Upsilon members are fully capable of understanding the laws and are simply choosing to ignore them. As a classroom teacher, I have recently had to deal with this sense of entitlement daily with my middle school students. Until Delta Upsilon members show the respect due to others, I hope that you revoke their Conditional Use Permit. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 36 37 From:Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:33 PM To:Szentesi, Whit Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks! ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 1:59 AM Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Bulbul, Quick point of clarification: One Council Member testified before the Grand Jury. In our statement, we say “Council Members” and I just wanted to make sure you knew it was a Council Member. I’m available if you have any follow up questions. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager 38 E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit 39 From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com 40 SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 41 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 1:29 PM To:Bulbul Rajagopal Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Quick point of clarification: One Council Member testified before the Grand Jury. In our statement, we say “Council Members” and I just wanted to make sure you knew it was a Council Member. I’m available if you have any follow up questions. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. 42 Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 43 From:Petersen, Cecilia Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:49 PM To:greeklife@calpoly.edu Subject:Fraternity and Sorority Fire Inspections Good afternoon, I hope this message finds you well. It's time to begin scheduling the annual fire and life safety inspections for each of the fraternity and sorority houses. To start coordinating inspection times, could you please forward me a current list of contacts for each house? Thank you in advance for your assistance. Cecilia Petersen Fire Inspector I Fire Department E CPeterse@slocity.org T 805.783.7773 C 805.550.9633 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 44 From:Amoroso, Brian Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:29 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Patino, Mallory; Corey, Tyler Subject:RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Thanks Timmi, will do. From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:59 AM To: Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Cc: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: FW: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Hi Brian, You might want to look at Kathie’s comment that is in the link below – she raises specific issues/questions about who responds to certain types of noise calls in PD…just want you to be aware in case questions come up about it. Thanks, Timmi From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:33 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker, K. (2) - Reeves Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration 45 E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 46 From:Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:09 PM To:Stewart, Erica A Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Erica! ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 9:40 PM Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, Bulbul! I’ve answered a couple of questions below. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? The council and city staff will be discussing the report findings and our responses at a Council meeting in September. 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? I believe you should get a statement from city staff about the findings. I’m happy to respond once you have seen the city staff response. There’s quite a bit of information there. 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? My understanding is the Grand Jury spoke with the SLO Police Chief, who is the person in charge of the police department. In addition they spoke to Ms. Wallace who 47 was in charge of the communications. I’m not sure who the Grand Jury is referring to, but I would like to have a better understanding of the Grand Jury’s assertions in this report. 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. I have been and will continue to discuss the report, its findings and recommendations with city leadership and Cal Poly to have a better understanding of the Grand Jury’s assertions in this report and the effects on our two organizations. In addition, the city provided clarifications and questions on Friday, due to an extension to research and respond received from the Grand Jury. These clarifications were not included in the report that was published and the city’s questions were not answered. I assume you will see some of this in the city’s statement. In the end, council and staff have been working with many people in the community to understand the effects of Cal Poly, housing needs, and noise. Throughout the 25–27 financial plan’s eight months of community engagement, we heard the community needs more safe, healthy housing, as well as neighborhood livability. Those are both part of our major city goals for the 25-27 years. I’m sure we will be working on much of what makes a home safe and a neighborhood enjoyable to live in within the city of San Luis Obispo. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 estewart@slocity.org 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The best way to report general issues within City limits or to request City services during this time is via Ask SLO, www.slocity.org/Ask. From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05:37 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, 48 I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX 49 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:08 PM To:Shoresman, Michelle Cc:McDonald, Whitney Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Michelle, The Mayor did testify as a part of the process. Just let us know if there are any other questions! Greg From: Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:50 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Wow. Only looked at the first few pages of the response. But…wow. One question so far…did they talk to a councilmember? They say they did. From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:39:44 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO BCC: City Council Mayor and Council Members, Please see the response that was provided to the New Times below. We will also be working on a communication plan to share additional information with the public and media through the formal response to the Grand Jury. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: 50 The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly 51 San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 52 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:59 AM To:Amoroso, Brian Cc:Patino, Mallory; Corey, Tyler Subject:FW: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Hi Brian, You might want to look at Kathie’s comment that is in the link below – she raises specific issues/questions about who responds to certain types of noise calls in PD…just want you to be aware in case questions come up about it. Thanks, Timmi From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:33 AM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker, K. (2) - Reeves Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 53 From:Shoresman, Michelle Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:50 AM To:Hermann, Greg Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Wow. Only looked at the first few pages of the response. But…wow. One question so far…did they talk to a councilmember? They say they did. From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:39:44 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO BCC: City Council Mayor and Council Members, Please see the response that was provided to the New Times below. We will also be working on a communication plan to share additional information with the public and media through the formal response to the Grand Jury. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. 54 If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 55 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:40 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Wallace, Christine; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Szentesi, Whit Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO Attachments:20250620_City of SLO Memo to GJ_Town & Gown.pdf Importance:High BCC: City Council Mayor and Council Members, Please see the response that was provided to the New Times below. We will also be working on a communication plan to share additional information with the public and media through the formal response to the Grand Jury. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit 56 From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 57 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:34 AM To:kathie walker Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Another SLOPD complaint at 720 E. Foothill (Item 4a, Planning Commission 6/25/2025) Hi Kathie, Thank you for your additional input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:08 AM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Another SLOPD complaint at 720 E. Foothill (Item 4a, Planning Commission 6/25/2025) Planning Commissioners, For the record, the SLOPD log showed yet another noise complaint for a "loud party" at 720 Foothill on Saturday, 6/21/2025. The log shows there was a delay of almost one hour before SLOPD dispatched anyone, and they sent a SNAP employee named "I. Dahmen", shown as Unit P1 on the log. SNAP is not supposed to be dispatched to fraternity houses (or addresses with a previous noise citation within 9 months). 720 Foothill is a fraternity and has also had multiple citations within the past 9 months. It should have been coded as "NOISE POLICE" under "Type" in the upper left corner of the SLOPD call log, as shown below. "NOISE POLICE" requires a response from a sworn officer, but somehow the call was mistakenly input as "Noise Party"; the call was delayed, and SNAP was dispatched. The red arrows show the call on Saturday, 6/21 (top) as Type: "Noise Party," which was changed in SLOPD's database from "NOISE POLICE" (bottom), shown on a previous citation, and all previous calls to 720 E. Foothill Blvd. 58 It looks like SNAP called other SLOPD Units 4248 and 4247. In any event, the noise complaint was ultimately cleared as a negative violation. SLOPD could provide more information about the mix-up and delay, what the complaining party reported hearing, and what the officers observed when they got there, an hour after the call was made on 6/21. This is the 11th noise complaint made for 720 E. Foothill since the beginning of the academic year in September for a loud party or other disturbing noise. 59 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:34 AM To:Terry Reeves Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Planning Commission 6/25/25 Item 4a. Hi Terry, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:10 AM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission 6/25/25 Item 4a. June 25, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission 976 Osos St., Room 200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 To the Honorable Members of the City of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission: On behalf of the Delta Upsilon/Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation, I am writing in support to renewal of the Conditional Use Permit granted to the Delta Upsilon Fraternity operating at 720 Foothill Boulevard. We understand that this is a serious issue that demands full attention from the undergraduate active chapter and the alumni organization which owns the property. 60 It’s no secret. Students and residents in college towns all over America exist in a sort of love/hate relationship. There is so much to love in college towns and to any resident or alumni, San Luis Obispo is the top of Mt Everest. What’s not to love? Whether it’s the small college town vibe, the feeling of a forever young community, or all the business the college brings in, everyone loves Cal Poly SLO. With that said, Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo have a student population problem. Enrollment is continually increasing and while they are working at it, campus housing has not been able to keep up. More and more students are having to find off-campus housing and the strain it has on City residents is more pronounced now than it has ever been. More students lead to young adults learning to live on their own, and City residents wondering how to control them. So how do fraternities fit in? To some in the community, fraternities don’t. They have a vision that if fraternities were gone, noise issues would disappear, parties would be non-existent, and every student would be the nice little neighbor we all hope for. Contrary to those misled beliefs, we would argue fraternities are much more than the neighborhood nuisance they are continually made out to be. We believe fraternities are an olive branch, which through philanthropic events and community outreach give back to their community at a rate much higher than non-Greek organizations. For more than 70 years, Cal Poly Chapter of Delta Upsilon International Fraternity has been a part of the fabric of San Luis Obispo; and our Chapter has never been stronger. Since 1955, Delta Upsilon has been shaping highly motivated, fully developed, creative, hardworking and deeply committed young men into model pillars of the community. Our brotherhood includes CEOs, doctors, lawyers, politicians, and engineers to name a few. What started with 15 young men in 1955, has now grown to a multi-generational organization with over 1,000 alumni and 100 active members. Since our founding as a Chapter, Delta Upsilon (originally founded as Alpha Upsilon) has seen several locations throughout the SLO community. We started on Garden Street in 1956, moved to Marsh Street in the late 50’s (now occupied by Nate’s on Marsh), and then to Palm Street in 1975, until we finally settled at 720 & 726 Foothill Blvd in 1988. Beginning in 2013, the Alumni Corporation self-financed a complete teardown and rebuild to the facility you see today. Prior to rebuilding, we did an exhaustive search of SLO looking for other properties, closer to campus, that would be better suited for a Fraternity House. Ultimately, there was no better location. 720 Foothill is zoned R4, is completely surrounded by R4, sits on an arterial road and has retail commercial across the street. In our view, 720 Foothill was perfect. Today, the Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation owns and maintains a $2 million, 14 room, multifamily residential facility, that provides housing at a rate nearly 10% below market rate for SLO rental housing. This enables many in our chapter, especially those with financial difficulties, the opportunity to afford and graduate from Cal Poly. While our facility does have a Use-Permit to operate as a Fraternity, the primary use is as a residence where for 14 students who live on-site. Our Alumni Corporation provides active mentoring and oversight of the Chapter though our nine-person executive board. While there may be some other Greek Alumni groups operating at Cal Poly, I believe our Corporation is the only one who own our own Chapter House and takes an active role in the mentoring of our Active Chapter. Together, our Alumni Corporation and active brothers have been operating under a City Use-Permit since 1989, and we take the process very seriously. Fraternities are cyclical. Every 4-5 years there is complete active membership turnover, so as Alumni we have a responsibility to the Community and want to ensure that our active chapter understands and follows the rules outlined in the permit. Much like the undergrads, our Alumni Board experiences turnover, contacts change and focus shifts. To help ensure the proper ongoing attention is given to the Use Permit and other zoning issues, our Board is actively working to establish a new position with a primary focus on the Use Permit and all City related issues. Our goal is to ensure that we are in front of any potential issues rather than responding to problems. 61 We are committed to working side by side with the active brothers and the City to ensure that any issues are mitigated in the future and improve student/resident relations. Furthermore, we would like to actively participate in any future workshops or discussions with the City and Community on how to proactively work for a plan that allows us all to coexist. Delta Upsilon is an organization that has had profound influences on generations of young men who have been fortunate enough to study at Cal Poly and experience the amazing City of San Luis Obispo. As a result, we have a strong core of alumni who have a lifelong passion to an organization and City that shaped us during our formative years and there is unwavering dedication to give the same opportunities to the fine young men that are coming through Cal Poly today. At a time when young men face record levels of isolation, confusion about masculinity, and lack of healthy role models, we are a stabilizing force. This further benefits the community in multiple ways:  Academic Excellence contributes to the university’s reputation and overall success  Community Service and Philanthropy directly benefit local nonprofits and families  Leadership Development prepares responsible, civic-minded men  Structured Brotherhood reduces the likelihood of reckless behavior associated with unstructured social circles If we are discouraged from continuing our role on campus and in the community, we risk more than just the loss of tradition. We risk:  Creating a vacuum where unmentored young men are more likely to engage in destructive behaviors  Eliminating a proven structure that holds members to high standards of conduct, academics, and service  Sending a message that excellence, when misunderstood or mischaracterized, will be punished rather than supported With all that said, tonight you are discussing and voting to extend our Use-Permit with modifications, or to revoke it. Yes, there have been some noise complaints (no unruly gatherings) and yes there must be improvement. But while you debate the merits of our application, we ask that you consider our recent merits, our future intentions, and the very real benefits we offer to this city and its people. Delta Upsilon has been part of our neighborhood for over 30 years and we (Alumni and Actives) are committed to improving its health, safety and wellbeing, as well as being standard bearers for all fraternities. We’re committed to:  Open communication with city leaders  Transparent expectations for conduct and responsibility  Hosting events that serve—not disturb—the community  Upholding the highest standards of brotherhood and accountability Our chapter is not perfect, but it is intentional. It is supported. It is accountable. And above all, it is committed to building better men. We thank you for your time and look forward to working with you as we continue to develop young leaders who serve with character, honor, and respect. 62 Respectfully submitted, Terry Reeves, Cal Poly ‘99 President, Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation Delta Upsilon International Fraternity, Cal Poly Chapter. -- Terry 63 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:33 AM To:CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Subject:06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker, K. (2) - Reeves Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 64 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:26 AM To:McDonald, Whitney Cc:Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Wallace, Christine; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO Attachments:20250620_City of SLO Memo to GJ_Town & Gown.pdf Importance:High FYI, the response below has been sent to Bulbul. Greg and I are discussing next steps and working on a communications plan for how we can move forward to ensure that the City’s perspective and accurate information are made publicly available. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. 65 It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 66 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:23 AM To:Bulbul Rajagopal Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Attachments:20250620_City of SLO Memo to GJ_Town & Gown.pdf Hi Bulbul, Here is the City’s statement in response to your questions below: The City is aware of the Grand Jury’s recent report and will be providing a detailed response within the required 90-day period. The City has fully cooperated with the Grand Jury with senior staff from multiple departments (including the Police Chief, Police Department Public Affairs Manager, Community Development Director, Code Enforcement staff, City Manager, and Council Members) testifying before the Grand Jury in addition to providing significant amounts of information in response to requests. We are concerned with both the factual inaccuracies (see the attached, which was also sent to the Grand Jury on June 20, 2025) and conclusions drawn in the report. It’s important to know that the City of San Luis Obispo has a long history of innovative approaches to addressing neighborhood wellness and we will continue to work with our community to maintain and improve our neighborhoods. This requires everyone to do their part, work together, and abide by the laws our community has in place. Our balanced approach includes education, collaboration, and law enforcement and we are proud to have a demonstrated history of using constructive feedback to identify areas of concern and respond to issues as they arise. More details about our response to the Grand Jury report will be made available soon. It’s my understanding that you sent the same questions to several staff members and all City Council members. Please note that this statement is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly. My cell phone number is (805) 440- 5446 and you can also send any questions or requests for information at communications@slocity.org. Thanks, Whit From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. 67 My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution City of San Luis Obispo, City Administration, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7114, slocity.org 1 To: The Grand Jury of San Luis Obispo County Via: Foreperson, Bonnie McKrill From: The City of San Luis Obispo Date: June 20, 2025 Re: Clarification of Factual Inconsistencies in Report, Round & Round with Town & Gown The City of San Luis Obispo (City) team appreciates the opportunity afforded by the Grand Jury to review the report entitled “Round & Round with Town & Gown” ahead of publication. We believe this opportunity will help ensure that the community has the best available information related to this important issue. With that in mind, the City has reviewed the report contents and is offering clarifications of fact in the table below to help correct what we believe may be inaccuracies in the draft report. Text in the “Quote from Report” column is copy-pasted from the draft Grand Jury report the City reviewed. The City’s concerns as to the accuracy of each quote are in the far-right column. Page # Quote from Report Factual Problem 1 Many students now reside in single- family homes, often exceeding their intended occupancy. The phrase “intended occupancy” is unclear and not reflective of a defined legal term. Legal occupancy is a concrete, discernable number derived from the California Building Code. Please provide citation to relevant occupancy data supporting the conclusion stated. 1 Over the past two decades, SLO has experienced significant growth, driven The population of the City of SLO has not increased significantly over the last two decades and remains under 50,000 at the last census (2020). Page 2 of 27 in part by the expansion of its university, California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), and the increasing student population. The enrollment of Cal Poly is a separate number and is not captured in the census for the City, as Cal Poly is not located in the City and the campus houses significant portions of its student body on its campus. Even as to students who reside in housing within the City of San Luis Obispo, those students may have been counted as living at a City address, or at their permanent residence address somewhere outside City limits. It would be more accurate to say that Cal Poly’s student population has had significant growth. 1 SLO has experienced steady population growth, mirroring broader urban expansion trends across California. In 2005, the city’s population stood at approximately 44,380, and, by 2025, it had risen to 50,612, reflecting a 14% increase. The 2025 population number appears to be a projection and is not a verified current number. Please accurately reflect the City’s population based on a statistically valid and verified source (i.e., U.S. Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) or the American Community Survey). 1-2 As a result, university students now comprise nearly 46% of the city's total population… This is incorrect. Not all university students live in the City and, at the time of each census, not all students who do reside in the City during the school year would necessarily be counted as City residents for census purposes. Cal Poly’s student enrollment is not a de facto subset of census numbers or City population estimates. Again, Cal Poly’s campus, and therefore campus housing, is not within the City limits. 2 … significantly influencing housing availability both on and off campus, infrastructure demands, and neighboring residential community dynamics. Provide factual details to support these general conclusions. The statement lacks clarity. 2 Many long-term residents, particularly families, cherish the stability and tranquility of their neighborhoods but now face the challenge of residing in The term “Family(ies)” is used more than once in the report but is undefined. If it refers to a household with school-aged children, by definition those children did not exist 20 years ago (the look-back period that is referred to by the population numbers). Page 3 of 27 an increasingly student-centered neighborhood. 2 …large, unsanctioned street parties that escalate into public disturbances, injuries, and property damage. This use of “unsanctioned street parties” seems focused on the St. Patrick’s Day related event (“St. Fratty’s Day”), which is a singular, annual occurrence. If there are other instances of such street parties being referenced, clarification is requested as to where and when those took place. 2 The complaints alleged that the City of SLO and Cal Poly officials were failing to enforce existing rules and municipal ordinances, that citizen complaints were ignored, and neither took sufficient action to restore order. All official citizen complaints received by the Police Department and the Code Enforcement Division are fully investigated. If the report is defining “complaint" in a specific way, that definition should be included in the glossary. 2 The San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury (SLOCGJ) sought to objectively assess the extent of these issues and determine whether city officials were implementing timely and sufficient countermeasures to address them effectively. The report’s focus on the City leaves out the role of Cal Poly and property owners in addressing issues. Looking solely at the City's role misses significant pieces of the picture, most notably Cal Poly and their much more comprehensive access to student information and greater ability to regulate student conduct, and property owners/landlords/property managers responsible for management of their rental properties in the City and their tenants’ use of their properties in a manner that facilitates neighborhood nuisances. 3 conducted fifteen interviews with San Luis Obispo city residents, city leadership (including City Council members, Community Development and Police Department officials), city personnel (such as Code Enforcement), and leadership from Cal Poly Implies that no interview was held with the City Manager and leaves out the interview with the non-sworn Police staff member who is one of the persons most knowledgeable on town-gown topics. Page 4 of 27 4 conducted analyses of policies and laws, including… Cal Poly’s General Plan Clarify what document this is referring to as Cal Poly does not have a general plan. 4 conducted comparative research, including an investigation of cities with overlay zones to understand their implementation and impact. Explored various policing models, such as the “Do No Harm” approach, examined strategies used by other cities addressing similar university-related challenges, and analyzed party ordinances from other municipalities. More specificity as to what materials are being referenced would be helpful context for readers. The attached bibliography contains general links to website home pages, rather than pinpoint resources seemingly being referenced, and there are no citations within the report connecting statements to sources. 5 The “Do No Harm” approach was adopted not only due to concern for officer safety but because a more aggressive officer presence could incite a riot. Though quoted in the report as an official term, “Do No Harm” is not a phrase used by the City Police department. However, the technique described is indeed one SLOPD planned and implemented (to not use aggression should students occupy a street, with a focus on de- escalation, community safety, closing affected streets, and other tactics due to the high risk of crowds turning violent, the prevalence of alcohol impaired judgment, and past experiences in SLO with riots). 5 In 2024 the SLO City Chief of Police deemed their efforts a success as no harm was done to officers or attendees. However, the residents in the area experienced property damage to their residences and personal property. It is an accurate data point that there were minimal arrests and citations in 2024 given the crowd size, and property damage was minimal overall. The comparison within this statement, however, implies a disregard for property damage, which is false. 5 The SLOCGJ wanted to determine the validity of the alleged citizen complaints against the SLOPD as well A citizen complaint against a police officer or department has a specific meaning and triggers a formal process for investigation. The reported dissatisfaction with prioritization of police resources that was investigated by the Grand Jury should be distinguished from the formal Page 5 of 27 as verify statements received from others during our investigation. complaint investigation process, which is diligently followed by the City/SLOPD. (See California Penal Code Section 832.5.) 5 We were blocked in this effort by two senior police official’s [sic] unwillingness to grant an interview. The Grand Jury interviewed the City Chief of Police and its Public Affairs Manager, both providing extensive and sworn testimony. These two staff members are the City’s most knowledgeable on the strategic, operational, prioritization and historical perspectives of law enforcement and community relations related to the student impacts on City residents and activities. The Grand Jury chose not to subpoena any witnesses and there was no need for additional City staff to divert scarce operational resources toward likely incomplete and/or duplicative appearances that would have been inefficient and operationally unsupportable based on the City’s understanding of the scope of inquiry. In addition, the police department provided hundreds of requested records and communications, and responded to multiple sets of subsequent and follow-up questions to accurately clarify and verify any and all information requested by or testimony provided to the Grand Jury, which reflects the most complete and accurate source of information. 5-6 In 2024 fireworks were set off in the Alta Vista neighborhood between 3:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., jolting some residents and their families awake. This incident is unverified. On March 16, 2024, the City received approximately 30 noise/party calls for service between 02:15am and 08:00am. None of those calls indicated fireworks were heard. 6 The damage was so extensive that Cal Poly had to close some dorms for two days to repair the damage. This statement is incorrect. Muir residence hall closed for a few hours and was reopened the same day to residents. 6 No representatives from the surrounding neighborhoods were invited to participate in the task force. The City, Cal Poly, and representatives of the community, including representatives of the Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN) group, and members of the public, participate in monthly Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) meetings where town-gown issues are discussed. Following the 2024 St. Patrick’s Day event and at the request of the San Luis Obispo City Manager, all SCLC agendas had a standing item for reports to be provided by both the City and Cal Poly regarding Page 6 of 27 their preparations and work to address St. Patrick’s Day. To the extent that outcomes from the task force meetings could be shared with the group, they were at that time, on a monthly basis. During these monthly meetings, SCLC members and the public were provided opportunities to ask questions and provide feedback. Additionally, several City officials met with RQN representatives well in advance of the 2025 St. Patrick’s Day event to discuss detailed information regarding the City’s preparations. 7 The City of SLO, concerned about the safety of their neighborhoods, the disruptions to the residents, and the negative image of the City of SLO, developed their own task force headed up by the SLO City Police Department. Although work was done throughout the year to prepare for the 2025 St. Fratty’s Day event, there was no SLOPD “Task Force” officially formed. SLOP D engaged in the same planning and preparation process as in prior years, but with a larger response planned for 2025, which included coordination with other law enforcement agencies, Cal Poly, and other City departments such as Fire, Public Works, and Parks & Recreation. 7 The messaging developed by the City of SLO was “Do Not Come, the party is over.” The $125,000 cost estimate listed at the end of this paragraph in the report includes the marketing costs for 2025. The communication plan was extensive with staff spending approximately 40 hours in the months leading up to St. Patrick’s Day speaking to student groups on campus about the Safety Enhancement Zone and communicating to them what to expect. TV ads, radio ads, “every door direct mail” postcards to 8000 addresses, additional postcards handed out by patrol, paid social ads, message boards, three radio station in-person interviews, and Adam Montiel's podcast were all completed to inform students prior to the day of the event. It should also be noted that the City participates annually in Cal Poly Day Week of Welcome to inform and set conduct expectations with each successive year of new students to Cal Poly, and has done so for many, many years. 7 In 2025, the SLO Police Department activated the Emergency Operations Center (EOC)… Cal Poly activated their EOC. The City activated a Department Operations Center (DOC) at the Police Department, which is different from the City’s Emergency Operations Center, so this is an inaccurate statement as to the City. Page 7 of 27 7 Due to the increased law enforcement presence, the neighborhood of Alta Vista did not experience damage to property and there was no unsanctioned street party. The phrasing here suggests that the number of officers was the only factor in the reduction of disturbances, leaving out important details about the work and effort SLOPD did to prepare a plan, broadly communicate, and execute it with coordination and support from multiple other City departments as well as many other agencies. Multiple patrol methods were used including foot patrols, bicycle patrols, motorcycle patrols and mounted horse patrols. Walkways and access routes to and from campus were manned with officers and signs/barriers, directing revelers back out of the area. In addition, rental lighting and electronic street signage were deployed in the area to improve safety and inform visitors of the enforcement activities. A nearby Law Enforcement field campus included support services, a mobile booking station staffed by the San Luis Obispo Sheriff's Office, as well as Fire Department personnel for medical support, and City Public Works personnel for any road closure needs. The Police department used extensive mobile surveillance cameras mounted on street poles, and multiple drones to provide live video feeds back to the DOC. SLOPD also leveraged relationships with AT&T and Verizon to provide increased bandwith and network monitoring to ensure communications capabilities during the event. The National Guard also assisted by providing technology support used to track officers in the field for situational awareness as to their locations. The CHP also assisted on the night prior to the event by conducting a DUI checkpoint and screened over 1000 vehicles to deter partying in the hours leading up to the event. 7 The SLO Chief of Police Department estimated costs to the city will be approximately $125,000. This estimate does not include any costs borne by other Law Enforcement agencies who assisted and did not charge the City for their time. The $125,000 number also does not include any City personnel who were already scheduled to work, as it was calculated on overtime and equipment/logistics needed for the event. Page 8 of 27 7 The concert at Cal Poly was deemed a success as over 6,000 students attended the event. The event was limited to 5,000 students; however, un- ticketed students pushed through the temporary fencing so they could get into the event. Though this is concerning, no one was seriously injured. When the fence around the event was breached, Cal Poly EOC requested help from the SLOPD DOC as they needed more officers to manage the crowd. Two 12-Officer teams were immediately sent to respond to the concert venue and help restore order. 7 The alternative activity on campus ended around 10:30 a.m. The report does not include an estimate of Cal Poly’s costs to host the concert/alternative activity, which have been made publicly available. This data would seem to be important to facilitate fully informed community-wide assessment of the relative costs and benefits of the comprehensive prevention and response effort. 8 SLO Municipal Code 9.12 (see Bibliography) provides that “…it shall be unlawful for any person to willfully or negligently make or continue to make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, or permit or allow to be made or continued any noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which causes any discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity in the area.” This quote is from section 9.12.040 of the SLO Municipal Code. 8 The specific code violation encompassed in the above-mentioned Code states that the hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following morning are to remain quiet. The reference to the 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. timeframe is in SLO Municipal Code section 9.12.050 and technically only applies to: “Radios, Television Sets, Musical Instruments and Similar Devices. Operating, playing or permitting the operation or playing of any radio, television set, phonograph, drum, musical instrument, or similar device which Page 9 of 27 produces or reproduces sound.” There is a similar provision in a separate section that restricts construction noise during the same timeframe. 8 It should also be noted that the Noise Control Officer may grant exceptions to this restriction. SLO Municipal Code section 9.12.100 provides for an exception process that requires a permit application and establishing criteria by which either the SLOPD Chief or the Community Development Director may grant exceptions. The sentence quoted here does not reflect the correct permitting and approval process required for the exception. 8-9 …noise citations in neighborhoods near the campus were issued an average of more than 3 times per week during the school session. This totaled 139 citations in the Alta Vista neighborhood, with one house alone receiving 17 citations. Unfortunately, there is reason to believe that this situation remains - to this date - unabated. Such is the irritation of area residents, that many have fled the area. There has been a 50% reduction in noise calls received by SLOPD over the past 10 years. It is important for the report to acknowledge that the problem was much worse, and great effort has been made to achieve this reduction in calls for service. Use of phrases like “fully enforced” and “unabated” implies an expectation that there should be no noise complaint calls from any neighborhood, which is unreasonable and unattainable. There is also ambiguity as to the timeframe of these citation numbers and to what property the 17 citations were issued. Please clarify what data points are being cited here as our data does not support this conclusion. In contradiction to the statement that noise violations are being allowed to continue “unabated,” the City’s Planning Commission revoked two CUPs for fraternities near campus (1236 Monte Vista Place and 1304 Foothill Blvd) on June 11, 2025, in part due to noise violations. The Planning Commission is reviewing a third fraternity CUP for modification or revocation on June 25, 2025. The City has also cited multiple houses for illegal fraternity operations in R-1 zones as result of noise complaints, and dozens of citations are issued each year. 9 To aid in noise ordinance enforcement the SLOPD employs the assistance of Cal Poly students who are enrolled in a SNAP Officers are City employees, not enrolled in any school program, and are a mix of Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and Hancock College students. Page 10 of 27 program called the Student Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP). 9 These students interface with groups of partiers in residences in the affected area who are violating the noise ordinance. SNAP Officers respond to noise complaints city-wide, not just adjacent to campus. 9 These unarmed SNAP students speak to the offending parties and attempt to get them to comply with the city’s noise standards. There are, however, only a handful of SNAP students. They wear civilian uniforms and work in pairs. They also have radios so that they may contact the police when required. SNAP are student civilian employees of the Police Department who operate as a first response to noise calls. Their primary objective is to educate residents about the City’s noise ordinance, issue a written warning where appropriate, and gain compliance to end the noise disturbance, thus keeping sworn officers free to handle other public safety calls for service. SNAP employees do not carry weapons, and they wear polo shirts and pants. If residents are uncooperative or the situation appears dangerous, they are trained to request officers to respond. 9 These students may, at their discretion, issue Disturbance Advisement Cards (DACs). SNAP and patrol both issue DACs, with SNAP alone issuing 588 DACs in 2024. Officer discretion is guided by Lexipol policy 430 and other training (see SNAP manual Section V: Noise Complaint Enforcement & Safety Expectations). 9 Complainants indicated that weekend parties can mean up to 100 or more students at one address and often continue after visits by police. SNAP students do not go to lettered fraternity houses; such visits are reserved for sworn officers. Responding officers can issue a citation for a party as either multiple citations at the same time or as additional citations if the problem persists. There was one unruly gathering citation during the St. Fratty's Day 2025 event, and 22 Unruly Gathering citations issued in 2024. Unruly Gathering citations are used for very large parties that meet defined criteria in the municipal code that cause significant disturbance to the neighborhood. 9 SLO Municipal Code 9.12.050 is specific about excessive noise. It provides a detailed list of prohibited acts between the hours of 10 p.m. and Various City Municipal Code sections are being conflated in these sentences. Sections 9.12.040, 9.12.050.A, and 9.12.050.B regulate different types of sound sources and are applied in different contexts, not all relevant to party noise situations. Page 11 of 27 7 a.m. While it does not specifically prohibit noise from parties, it does speak to the use of loudspeakers and other electronic devices, including: “radio, television set, phonograph, drum, musical instrument, or similar device which produces or reproduces sound…” 10 If found to be out of compliance, SLOPD may issue a warning or citation. Citations can be either criminal or administrative, but most often noise violations are citated administratively. 10 In 2023, using extensive citizen- generated data from a Cal Poly- generated report required by AB524, code enforcement started an investigation into the illegal fraternities. Based on the investigation, 30-40 Advisory Notices, and 22 Notice of Violations (NOVs) were sent to property owners. In addition, there have been 22 NOVs and 6 administrative citations issued since the 2023 investigation related to unpermitted fraternities or use permit violations. 10 At the time, Cal Poly and code enforcement were working together on the illegal fraternity issue. However, due to changes in policies, Cal Poly stopped assisting the city, stating privacy concerns, and revised their AB 524 report to remove some of the addresses that were previously provided in the document. Cal Poly has removed information about the location of parties from its public reports, which previously facilitated the City’s enforcement of its regulations. Outside of the AB 524 report, the City has requested the information directly from Cal Poly, but those requests have been denied. Page 12 of 27 11 Based on the SLOCGJ investigation, the number of illegal fraternities may be more than 40 locations currently operating in the city. In addition, citizens have reported that several Cal Poly recognized fraternities listed in AB524 have multiple illegal fraternity locations operating within the city: some with as many as 7 separate locations. Please clarify from what sources these numbers are derived and on what verified evidence they are based, keeping in mind the constitutional considerations/limitations noted below in response to report finding #3. 11-12 Code enforcement complaints are often received after business hours or the following day. The result is that they are limited in their ability to verify the code violation, as it is after the fact or violators are not easily identified. Party activities reported to police are documented and provided to code enforcement, and there is no barrier to the City using all of the information in the possession of either the Police Department or the Community Development Department to pursue enforcement. It is inaccurate to state the City cannot verify violations without sending code enforcement staff out on weekends or after hours; noise complaints received by emergency or non-emergency dispatch after hours are responded to by SLOPD and call logs and citations issued by the Police Department are evidence of that response. 13 The report also provides the address of each “affiliated chapter house” which AB 524 defines as those located on- campus or on land owned or leased by the fraternity or sorority. Education Code Section 66312 defines “chapter house” as “any residence located on or off campus that is owned by the institution of higher education but occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity, or any residence located on or off campus that is owned and occupied by the campus-recognized sorority or fraternity.” There is no definition of an “affiliated chapter house” in the Education Code. The Education Code’s definition of chapter house is confined to properties owned and occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity, or occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity and owned by the university. Page 13 of 27 13 Evidently, this means that of the 36 recognized fraternities and sororities, 20 either do not have a chapter house or are in chapter houses that are off- campus and not owned or leased by the fraternity or sorority and therefore do not meet the definition of an affiliated chapter house. Clarify whether “chapter house” as used here is meant to refer to “unaffiliated chapter houses,” and by what definition this is being applied. 13 Any of these chapter houses that hold fraternity activities such as meetings, rush events, or parties, are still required by the SLO municipal code to have a CUP. Clarify if a distinction is being made between affiliated and unaffiliated chapter houses. 13-14 Since Cal Poly is not required to provide the addresses of these recognized fraternities, the city has no easy way to verify the location to determine the reason that the fraternity does not have a CUP. This makes it difficult for the city to enforce the code. It is legally debatable whether the addresses should be published and/or disclosed or not, but it is true that since Cal Poly now declines to provide specific address information regarding locations of all fraternity/sorority sponsored events, this does impede the City’s enforcement efforts. 14 These CUPs were approved over an extended period of time by planning commissions with different members; the earliest is dated in 1971 and the latest in 2024. That may explain why additional conditions were imposed on some fraternities and sororities and not others. It may also have to do with specific characteristics of the individual parcel. The differences in the CUPs also reflect regulatory changes to the City Municipal Code that have been made to address issues that have arisen with the fraternities and sororities over time. This is the nature of any CUP and CUP process; it allows for adjustments over time to address emergent needs through the exercise of discretion, individual review, and application of conditions of approval that are tailored to the unique potential impacts of each location as it is reviewed. Page 14 of 27 14 The planning commission has the authority to enforce these conditions, add new conditions if the existing conditions are not met, and ultimately revoke a fraternity’s CUP. It is within the authority of the City’s Planning Commission to take the steps described, but these are part of a process that also includes notice and due process to the permit holder and property owner. CUPs cannot be revoked without due process to the permit holder, which holds a property right to the permit. 14 Citizens can also appeal for a use permit to be revoked or request that a permit not be approved. The current cost to make such an appeal is $2,583.46, (in 2017 the appeal fee was $281.00). A complainant noted that the cost to appeal discourages this practice. The cost described here is what a citizen would pay to appeal any decision of the Planning Commission immediately after a CUP is approved or denied. There is also a process that costs no money through which a member of the public can report potential CUP or zoning violations to the Community Development Director. Once investigated, City staff can bring substantiated violations before the Planning Commission for consideration without any cost incurred by the citizen. This process has led to the revocation of two CUPs this year, and several other CUPs are either scheduled proactively by the City for a future hearing or are being investigated based on violations of conditions. 14-15 While these appeal fees may be justifiable for major development projects that demand substantial city resources like legal reviews, public hearings, or environmental impact assessments, they place an undue burden on ordinary citizens. As stated above, a member of the public does not need to pay a fee to make the Community Development Department aware of a potential violation of a CUP, which, if verified, can lead to re-review of the permit by the Planning Commission, and potential revocation. The appeal fees apply to the granting (or denial) of a CUP. The setting of fees, including the appeal fees referred to here, follows an extensive study process, reporting by staff, and deliberation by City Council, with fees based specifically on a fraction of the cost of processing an appeal. 15, F1 Prior to 2025, the city failed to effectively provide a multi-pronged, cohesive approach to manage or shut down large unsanctioned, costly and unruly events such as St. Fratty’s Day. This created an unsafe environment, SLOPD had a robust plan in 2024, based on the size and actions of the 2023 event. The City must balance police response vs. expected crowd size, danger to the community and financial constraints. It is not operationally or financially feasible to call in officers from all over the state every year out because something might happen. The need must be articulated based on intelligence and past experience, and the 2023 Page 15 of 27 with increasing size of unruly crowds, property damage, injuries and public disturbances. event did not rise to the level of problems to create a state-wide staffing aid request in 2024. Each year’s staffing and tactical plan is prudent and appropriate based on previous events and current expected attendance. The San Luis Obispo Police Department has effectively planned for and staffed numerous large-scale, unpermitted events dating back decades, including the end of Mardi Gras and Poly Royal events. Those events were distinctly different as they were permitted, official events that turned problematic. St. Fratty’s day started organically, has never been permitted, and has slowly grown over the years, with the exception of the COVID-19 pandemic years, where participation sharply declined. Each year, the Police Department engaged in significant community outreach, including print material, directed communication through Cal Poly and Cuesta Colleges, radio ads, door to door knock and talks, met with community organizations including RQN, and authored several media releases, ahead of the unpermitted St. Fratty’s Day event. The City changed the Municipal Code multiple times to increase fines as a means to deter problematic behavior (the Safety Enhancement Zone was amended in 2010 to include Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day, then amended again in February 2024, expanding the Safety Enhancement Zone to include two weekends prior to St. Patrick’s Day to cover the likely dates for St. Fratty’s Day). Robust operational plans were developed each year, in collaboration with Cal Poly, to staff public safety personnel in a meaningful and effective way. St. Fratty’s Day is a particularly difficult event to police, as it consists of revelers walking up and down the sidewalk, with no destination in mind. Short of completely shutting down a neighborhood to all traffic, both foot and vehicular, there are few options police have for preventing what would normally be constitutionally protected activity: walking down a sidewalk in a neighborhood. To further complicate enforcement, many of the revelers Page 16 of 27 actually live in the very neighborhoods that would be closed and would have to be provided access to their homes. As the event grew in scale, so did the public safety response. 2020-2021 saw minimal St. Fratty’s Day activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was not until 2023 that any extended street closure occurred due to the size of the crowd in the neighborhood. As a result of the increased crowds, the Safety Enhancement Zone was expanded, along with other tactical operational planning to prevent another occurrence. As the crowds in 2024 grew even larger, the departmental staffing became no longer sufficient to safely keep the crowds out of the streets and neighborhoods, resulting in extensive planning for 2025. 2025 planning included working with Cal Poly on a task force that met for almost one full year prior to March 2025. Extensive outreach was conducted, and a request for mutual aid was sent to many agencies across the state. There were over 300 law enforcement personnel in town working the 2025 St. Fratty’s Day event, along with additional personnel at Cal Poly Campus to provide security for the campus dorms and the alternative concert event planned on campus. Officers assisted from as far away as San Francisco and Ventura to ensure enough law enforcement presence in the neighborhood. As a result, although some revelers attempted to go into the street in 2025, no intersections or streets were closed to traffic due to revelers, and the party was effectively shut down, before it started and without incident. For many years, the department has also utilized advanced technology such as drones, and mobile surveillance cameras, along with print materials, street signage and targeted outreach to problem houses in an effort to deter the event. Department leadership worked in collaboration with SCLC monthly and met with the IFC (Intra-Fraternity Council) to engage in productive conversation to gain compliance and warn of the fines and Page 17 of 27 administrative sanctions that could come with illegal behavior. SLOPD Leadership were guests on several radio shows in an effort to distribute the message of zero tolerance ahead of the unplanned, unpermitted event, and participated in town-hall style meetings on campus with Cal Poly leadership and other City officials. In summation, the department conducted an outreach campaign as extensive as possible, and employed law enforcement officers from across the state, including horse-mounted patrols, motorcycle patrols, bicycle patrols, foot patrols and mobile teams to effectively end any problems early and quickly. The department fully staffed an Operations Center to function as a command post, and in conjunction with the San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Office, created a Law Enforcement Campus near the event, for mobile booking and processing of arrestees. The combination of operational planning, use of technology and infrastructure, and the assistance from law enforcement partners from around the state, resulted in an extremely safe and trouble-free event. The crowd was not able to develop at any one location in the neighborhoods, and there were no reported cases of property damage or injuries. In short, 2025 was an extreme success in quelling the event, which was the culmination of years of iteration and planning. The City spent over $100,000 in overtime and equipment related to the event. This amount does not include all of the staff time of everyone who was working their normal shift, or all of the other agencies, who supplied their personnel as no-cost mutual-aid. The total cost of the St. Fratty’s Day response was likely in the $700,000-$800,000 range when accounting for all staff time associated with anyone working the event. 2025 was the result of process evolution built upon years of previous plans, lessons learned, and extensive personal relationships built with student, law enforcement, and neighborhood community members Page 18 of 27 resulting in a least-harm approach to preventing what could have been a highly dangerous event. Additionally, for many years, the City has engaged in extensive outreach and education each year with Cal Poly to elevate awareness of City codes and conduct expectations, as well as engaging in robust enforcement against individuals engaging in misconduct, as well as landlords whose tenants engage in repeat violations at the landlords’ rental premises. The City notes that it has continued enforcement of its landlord responsibility provisions for properties that host repeat code violations, notwithstanding ongoing landlord and tenant opposition and even in the face of threats of legal challenges. 15, F2 The city has not effectively engaged in working together with community stakeholders to find solutions for ongoing off-campus issues that negatively impact neighborhoods such as code enforcement, noise issues, trespassing, property damage, and unruly events. Neighborhood Wellness was a Major City Goal (MCG) from 2011-2017 and then an Other Important Objective (OIO) from 2017-2019. During that time, the Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group was established and the 90-page report produced. Working groups included neighbors from areas directly off campus, students, City staff and Cal Poly staff. SLOPD, City Administration, and elected representatives of the City Council frequently meet with RQN and participate in SCLC. The Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group report contained recommendations, many of which were adopted by the City. Prior to adoption of the MCG, the social host ordinance was adopted in 2009, stating that party hosts can be held responsible for underage drinking at their parties. In 2010, the City Council adopted amendments to the noise ordinance. Instead of multiple warnings, one warning is provided, then the house goes on the premise list for 9 months and if more complaints are received, and violations verified, citations are issued. The fine structure was changed to $350 - $1000 and landlord Page 19 of 27 citations were added for repeat offenders. A Cal Poly - City MOU was adopted giving Cal Poly Police administrative citation powers a mile off campus. Party registration was piloted in 2017 and has been going strong since. Stakeholder walking meetings were implemented in the neighborhoods led by Cal Poly to provide residents the opportunity to give feedback on problem locations, though the walking meetings were not revived after COVID. The unruly gathering (UG) ordinance was amended, improving the definition of what a UG is, and Start of School safety enhancement was added in 2015. The City did not implement the keg registration recommendation contained in the Working Group Report because students no longer use kegs like they did in the 90s, nor did the City implement SNAP ride-alongs because SNAP employees are not sworn police officers. Even after the MCG and OIO expired, extensive amendments were made in 2024 to the safety enhancement zones for Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day to include additional weekends of enforcement. Partnerships between the police department and Cal Poly expanded to include focused outreach to incoming students during SLO Days, presentations and outreach to Fraternity and Sorority Life (FSL) chapters, outreach to sports teams and coaching staff and participation in off-campus housing fairs. Annually, the Public Affairs Manager presents to all 5000+ incoming new students and about half of all FSL individual chapters covering city ordinances that most effect students living on and off campus. In 2017, Council approved a pilot party registration program which has since proven to be very successful in reducing noisy parties and improving student-age City resident understanding of how to socialize without being disruptive. In 2024, the St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween safety enhancement zones were amended by Council to include additional dates which provide the police department a longer span of enforcement to better address negative Page 20 of 27 behaviors in the neighborhoods. Extensive communications plans are created and implemented to provide information to the community about neighborhood related ordinances, with the plans including postcard mailings, radio commercials and PSAs, TV commercials, on and off campus presentations to student groups, noise violations notifications to property owners, posters and flyers throughout the community and electronic communication via police department social media channels including paid ads targeted to college-age residents of the City. Additionally, noise and unruly gathering information is provided weekly to Cal Poly to be addressed via the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR). OSRR is also provided information on students who have been arrested for crimes in San Luis Obispo, such as suspected DUI, domestic violence, theft and assault. In addition, the City works extensively with Cal Poly on finding solutions for these issues. The SCLC is an additional venue for discussion, dialogue, and collaboration. The City is committed to ongoing engagement with a variety of community stakeholders related to neighborhood issues. More recently, City staff have participated in the following collaborative efforts:  January 10, 2024: City staff with Cal Poly Greek Life staff to discuss the complaints received regarding Fraternities and Sororities. Page 21 of 27  April 10, 2024: Follow up meeting with Assistant Director of Fraternity & Sorority Life regarding City’s response to unpermitted fraternities.  April 16, 2024: Presentation to Greek Organization Leadership regarding City regulations and enforcement methods for Fraternities/Sororities  August 2024: Community Development Director met with Cal Poly leadership to discuss the issue of Fraternities/Sororities and land use requirements for houses.  January 12, 2025: Presentation to Greek Organization Leadership regarding City regulations and enforcement methods for Fraternities/Sororities  March 4, 2025: Meeting with City staff and Cal Poly Greek Life staff to discuss the ongoing issues regarding Fraternities and Sororities and upcoming “St. Fratty’s Day” event. In addition to these scheduled meetings, code enforcement staff have met with numerous fraternity members as part of several investigations into alleged unpermitted events. During field inspections and hand delivery of violation notices, residents were verbally provided information regarding applicable regulations. City staff have clearly stated to Cal Poly that staff are available to attend events to educate students on compliance with City regulations. The Police Department specifically has worked tirelessly over the past decade to address these issues, supported by dedicated staff, new City ordinances, and proven programs that have delivered undeniable positive results. Noise complaints in particular have steadily declined to their lowest recorded levels, while voluntary compliance continues to Page 22 of 27 increase. In 2010, Council adopted revisions to the City’s noise ordinance, improving the definitions, raising the fines for violations, and adding a provision to include landlord penalties for repeat violations at individual properties. Since the change in the ordinance, there has been a 50% reduction in noise complaints. Prior to 2010, the police department would receive on average 3000 noisy party complaints each year and the average is now around 1450. 15, F3 The city has failed to effectively enforce municipal codes that prohibit fraternity and sorority activity in R-1/R- 2 zones in part due to the difficulty in identifying houses that are hosting fraternity-type events, such as rush events and repeated parties. This inaction has resulted in an increase of illegal fraternities holding events in residential neighborhoods making these areas almost unlivable for most residents. Along with the Cal Poly general enrollment numbers, participation in Greek life has also increased; with an increase in membership would understandably follow an increase in activity. The City enforces municipal code regulations that prohibit fraternity and sorority activity in R-1 and R-2 zones and behaviors that create neighborhood nuisances or otherwise violate City code, while balancing constitutionally protected rights of privacy and free association (specifically, keeping in mind that there are legal limits on a governmental entity’s ability to inquire into the personal relationships of persons living together in their private residences and to regulate the rights of such individuals to associate freely in their homes). The enforcement of these regulations is carried out on a complaint basis, consistent with most code enforcement issues. Since November 2023, the City has investigated over 103 complaints and opened 40 code enforcement cases related to fraternities without permits and violations of conditional use permits. In addition, the City proactively notified 33 suspected fraternity/sorority houses in R-1/R-2 zones that it is illegal to be a fraternity/sorority house in an R1/R2 zone through a courtesy notice. The City has proactively met with Cal Poly staff and students to provide education about compliance with zoning regulations so that Greek organizations can plan living arrangements accordingly, and so that students are aware that they will receive violations if they establish Page 23 of 27 fraternity/sorority houses in these zones. The City has also been attempting to obtain Greek event registration address information from Cal Poly in order to support enforcement efforts. There is no cited evidence to support what appears to be an individualized opinion that these neighborhoods are “almost unlivable” for residents and such value judgments presented as factual investigation or inquiry undermine the objectivity and credibility of the report’s analytical approach and conclusions. Cal Poly could substantially aid and enhance the effectiveness of the City’s prevention and enforcement efforts in addressing repeat or habitual misconduct by campus affiliated individuals and groups that occupy properties within the city through increased exchange of information regarding Greek event locations and through enhanced enforcement of its own student conduct measures. 15, F4 The city has failed to consistently enforce CUPs such as the requirements for an annual list of parties and events, notification to neighbors, and parking plans. Strict enforcement of these conditions would contribute to a reduction of the disturbances in the neighborhoods. The City enforces the provisions of CUPs as violations are reported and verified. In the last year, the City verified that 5 fraternities have violations of existing CUPs. This resulted in 3 hearings before the Planning Commission for revocation/revision of the CUPs in question, with additional hearings scheduled in upcoming months. In May 2025, the Planning Commission voted to revoke the CUPs for two fraternity houses due to violations of conditions of approval. 16, F5 The current planning appeal fee structure in SLO disproportionately impacts ordinary citizens, as the high costs create barriers for those raising concerns about community issues such as noise or safety. While these fees may be justifiable for large-scale As stated previously, the planning appeal fee described in the report is what a citizen would pay to appeal any decision of the Planning Commission. It costs nothing to report potential CUP or zoning violations to the Community Development Director. Once investigated, City staff would bring substantiated violations before the Planning Commission for consideration without any cost incurred by the citizen. This exact process has resulted in the re-review of several CUPs this year. Page 24 of 27 development appeals requiring additional city resources, they hinder equitable participation in local decision-making processes. It is an incredibly important distinction to make that citizens raising concerns about noise or safety is free. The appeal fee only applies to a decision on a CUP before the PC. In addition, the appeal fee structure was adopted by the City Council in 2024 after robust review of cost-of-service data presented in the associated fee study and report and following significant deliberation by the City Council regarding the fee amount. The Council carefully considered how much the fee should be subsidized in order to not discourage the involvement of ordinary citizens in the decision-making process. The fee is the same regardless of the status of the appealing party (whether a developer, city resident, non-city resident, etc.) and therefore does not disproportionately impact any specific party. The appeal fee is based on an analysis of the amount of time required to process an appeal, and, per City Council direction, the fee was set at a percentage of the full cost of processing an appeal in order to ensure it is not overly burdensome. 16, F6 The Grand Jury encountered a lack of cooperation from the San Luis Obispo City Police Department. While one sworn officer did participate in an interview, efforts to interview two additional sworn officers were unsuccessful. This unwillingness to engage hindered the Grand Jury’s ability to corroborate statements, obtain essential information, and maintain transparency in its oversight role. One of the City’s most knowledgeable persons on these topics is a non- sworn staff member and was interviewed for 90 minutes. The City provided its two most knowledgeable people (with the “one sworn Officer” being the Chief of Police) to be interviewed. No subpoenas were issued to Police staff. This is a false statement – The police department provided unimpeded and direct access to both the Chief of Police and the Public Affairs Manager, as well as written responses to multiple iterative series of questions, as well as providing documents with thousands of current and historical data points requested by the Grand Jury. Neither the City nor any particular City police department personnel was ever served with a subpoena for additional witnesses, documents, or data. The department Page 25 of 27 did decline further voluntary requests for additional interviews of department staff by the Grand Jury after complete access was already provided to the department’s Chief, the City Manager who supervises the Chief, and the civilian police department staff person who were best informed as to all relevant operations to speak most comprehensively about the issues the City understood were being investigated. Both agency representatives and the City Manager engaged thoroughly and exhaustively, responding to all questions submitted in person and in writing from the Grand Jury, on multiple occasions. The police department did not elect to “voluntarily” provide access to other shift working staff who have limited scopes of operational responsibility or, at best, incomplete historical information or who were themselves unable to speak with completeness or accuracy about current planning efforts for what was at the time the upcoming 2025 St. Patrick’s Day Celebration. The finding misrepresents the transparency and cooperation the police department and the City as a whole extended to the Grand Jury to complete the most accurate and comprehensive report possible on this dangerous and nuisance event for our community. The department has been extremely proactive in combatting this event and in providing critical information to the Grand Jury, Cal Poly, the City Council, and our community to reduce and ultimately prevent the dangerous street party, which was in fact accomplished this year, exceeding all expectations. 17, R6 The SLO City Manager and the Planning Commission should move toward adopting more uniform conditions for CUP’s [sic] and enforcement of existing requirements. As CUPs come in for re-review staff are ensuring that they are as consistent as possible with the new set of standard conditions the City has created, with uniform conditions being updated as needed. Setting constraints like a uniform set of conditions on the exercise of discretion diminishes the usefulness of the review process to address specific needs over time or for unique circumstances that may exist at specific properties or with particular groups or organizations. Page 26 of 27 17, R7 The SLOCGJ recommends that the SLO City Manager create formal guidelines and provide training outlining how the SLO City Police Department will respond to requests from the SLOCGJ and other oversite bodies. Grand jury requests vary in nature and scope and, by their nature, do not lend themselves to a uniform approach in each instance. The Police Chief is supervised by and accountable to the City Manager and the City Manager has and will continue to review and provide appropriate oversight and direction to her staff in providing staff responses, consulting with the City Attorney as needed. In the event a particular request directed to the police department demanded confidentiality from the City Manager, the City Attorney’s Office would review and advise the Department’s response and support communication to the City Council. 24-26 Bibliography Links are to general websites and not specific reference materials. No specific citations exist in the report. Some of the links do not appear to actually contain the information that they are being relied upon to support in the report. In addition to these specific factual corrections offered in the table above, we believe the overall tone of the report could be improved by removing language (e.g. comparing City zoning to the Twilight Zone television show) which trivializes both the serious issues for the neighborhoods and the tremendous ongoing resource investments made (past and present) by the City to address those concerns. The report also suffers from the recurring use of ambiguous phrases and references stated as facts, which do not seem to be connected to factual support or contextual or temporal data points, thereby diminishing the objectivity, credibility, and impact of the conclusions in the report. Some examples are: • “a quaint town with a rich history” • “once-quiet residential areas” • “residents—students, families, and long-time locals” • “a range of challenges for the surrounding neighborhoods” • “neighborhood integrity” Page 27 of 27 • “fully enforced” • “this situation remains - to this date - unabated” • “the affected area” • “warrant a police citation” • “a real time solution” The City recommends replacing those phrases with more precise language or providing the noted factual, temporal, or contextual support for the statements. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these clarifications, recommendations, and suggestions for the report before it is released to the public. We fully support the effort to provide the public with a complete and accurate picture of the issues raised in the complaints that gave rise to this report, and we hope our recommendations assist in that effort. 68 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:19 AM To:Szentesi, Whit; Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Attachments:RE: [EXT]Re: Grand Jury Report See attached From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:18 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can someone please send me the factual inaccuracies we sent to the grand jury on 6/20? I do not have a copy. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:16 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Importance: High This looks perfect to me, thank you!! Please go ahead and send to Bulbul and also let her know that we understand she has reached out to individual Council Members and that this is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City at this time. Thank you, all!! From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:49 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi all, Please see a revised holding statement below based on all of the feedback. It is also in the linked document. 69 Whitney, let us know if this is good to go and we can send to Bulbul. Greg From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:30 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit. Helpful뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. 70 Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 71 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick 72 <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. 73 My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 74 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:19 AM To:Szentesi, Whit; McDonald, Whitney; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Attachments:20250620_City of SLO Memo to GJ_Town & Gown.pdf Attached. Greg From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:18 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can someone please send me the factual inaccuracies we sent to the grand jury on 6/20? I do not have a copy. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:16 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Importance: High This looks perfect to me, thank you!! Please go ahead and send to Bulbul and also let her know that we understand she has reached out to individual Council Members and that this is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City at this time. Thank you, all!! From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:49 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi all, 75 Please see a revised holding statement below based on all of the feedback. It is also in the linked document. This is intended to just provide an initial response to meet the current deadline and provide time for us to complete our full response. I agree with Whit’s recommendation that we send a release out to the media and public when our response is completed with the other information folks have put in the document. That should be done in concert with a full communications plan which Whit is happy to draft. Whitney, let us know if this is good to go and we can send to Bulbul. Greg From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:30 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit. Helpful뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, 76 I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 77 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM 78 To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 79 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution City of San Luis Obispo, City Administration, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3249, 805.781.7114, slocity.org 1 To: The Grand Jury of San Luis Obispo County Via: Foreperson, Bonnie McKrill From: The City of San Luis Obispo Date: June 20, 2025 Re: Clarification of Factual Inconsistencies in Report, Round & Round with Town & Gown The City of San Luis Obispo (City) team appreciates the opportunity afforded by the Grand Jury to review the report entitled “Round & Round with Town & Gown” ahead of publication. We believe this opportunity will help ensure that the community has the best available information related to this important issue. With that in mind, the City has reviewed the report contents and is offering clarifications of fact in the table below to help correct what we believe may be inaccuracies in the draft report. Text in the “Quote from Report” column is copy-pasted from the draft Grand Jury report the City reviewed. The City’s concerns as to the accuracy of each quote are in the far-right column. Page # Quote from Report Factual Problem 1 Many students now reside in single- family homes, often exceeding their intended occupancy. The phrase “intended occupancy” is unclear and not reflective of a defined legal term. Legal occupancy is a concrete, discernable number derived from the California Building Code. Please provide citation to relevant occupancy data supporting the conclusion stated. 1 Over the past two decades, SLO has experienced significant growth, driven The population of the City of SLO has not increased significantly over the last two decades and remains under 50,000 at the last census (2020). Page 2 of 27 in part by the expansion of its university, California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), and the increasing student population. The enrollment of Cal Poly is a separate number and is not captured in the census for the City, as Cal Poly is not located in the City and the campus houses significant portions of its student body on its campus. Even as to students who reside in housing within the City of San Luis Obispo, those students may have been counted as living at a City address, or at their permanent residence address somewhere outside City limits. It would be more accurate to say that Cal Poly’s student population has had significant growth. 1 SLO has experienced steady population growth, mirroring broader urban expansion trends across California. In 2005, the city’s population stood at approximately 44,380, and, by 2025, it had risen to 50,612, reflecting a 14% increase. The 2025 population number appears to be a projection and is not a verified current number. Please accurately reflect the City’s population based on a statistically valid and verified source (i.e., U.S. Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) or the American Community Survey). 1-2 As a result, university students now comprise nearly 46% of the city's total population… This is incorrect. Not all university students live in the City and, at the time of each census, not all students who do reside in the City during the school year would necessarily be counted as City residents for census purposes. Cal Poly’s student enrollment is not a de facto subset of census numbers or City population estimates. Again, Cal Poly’s campus, and therefore campus housing, is not within the City limits. 2 … significantly influencing housing availability both on and off campus, infrastructure demands, and neighboring residential community dynamics. Provide factual details to support these general conclusions. The statement lacks clarity. 2 Many long-term residents, particularly families, cherish the stability and tranquility of their neighborhoods but now face the challenge of residing in The term “Family(ies)” is used more than once in the report but is undefined. If it refers to a household with school-aged children, by definition those children did not exist 20 years ago (the look-back period that is referred to by the population numbers). Page 3 of 27 an increasingly student-centered neighborhood. 2 …large, unsanctioned street parties that escalate into public disturbances, injuries, and property damage. This use of “unsanctioned street parties” seems focused on the St. Patrick’s Day related event (“St. Fratty’s Day”), which is a singular, annual occurrence. If there are other instances of such street parties being referenced, clarification is requested as to where and when those took place. 2 The complaints alleged that the City of SLO and Cal Poly officials were failing to enforce existing rules and municipal ordinances, that citizen complaints were ignored, and neither took sufficient action to restore order. All official citizen complaints received by the Police Department and the Code Enforcement Division are fully investigated. If the report is defining “complaint" in a specific way, that definition should be included in the glossary. 2 The San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury (SLOCGJ) sought to objectively assess the extent of these issues and determine whether city officials were implementing timely and sufficient countermeasures to address them effectively. The report’s focus on the City leaves out the role of Cal Poly and property owners in addressing issues. Looking solely at the City's role misses significant pieces of the picture, most notably Cal Poly and their much more comprehensive access to student information and greater ability to regulate student conduct, and property owners/landlords/property managers responsible for management of their rental properties in the City and their tenants’ use of their properties in a manner that facilitates neighborhood nuisances. 3 conducted fifteen interviews with San Luis Obispo city residents, city leadership (including City Council members, Community Development and Police Department officials), city personnel (such as Code Enforcement), and leadership from Cal Poly Implies that no interview was held with the City Manager and leaves out the interview with the non-sworn Police staff member who is one of the persons most knowledgeable on town-gown topics. Page 4 of 27 4 conducted analyses of policies and laws, including… Cal Poly’s General Plan Clarify what document this is referring to as Cal Poly does not have a general plan. 4 conducted comparative research, including an investigation of cities with overlay zones to understand their implementation and impact. Explored various policing models, such as the “Do No Harm” approach, examined strategies used by other cities addressing similar university-related challenges, and analyzed party ordinances from other municipalities. More specificity as to what materials are being referenced would be helpful context for readers. The attached bibliography contains general links to website home pages, rather than pinpoint resources seemingly being referenced, and there are no citations within the report connecting statements to sources. 5 The “Do No Harm” approach was adopted not only due to concern for officer safety but because a more aggressive officer presence could incite a riot. Though quoted in the report as an official term, “Do No Harm” is not a phrase used by the City Police department. However, the technique described is indeed one SLOPD planned and implemented (to not use aggression should students occupy a street, with a focus on de- escalation, community safety, closing affected streets, and other tactics due to the high risk of crowds turning violent, the prevalence of alcohol impaired judgment, and past experiences in SLO with riots). 5 In 2024 the SLO City Chief of Police deemed their efforts a success as no harm was done to officers or attendees. However, the residents in the area experienced property damage to their residences and personal property. It is an accurate data point that there were minimal arrests and citations in 2024 given the crowd size, and property damage was minimal overall. The comparison within this statement, however, implies a disregard for property damage, which is false. 5 The SLOCGJ wanted to determine the validity of the alleged citizen complaints against the SLOPD as well A citizen complaint against a police officer or department has a specific meaning and triggers a formal process for investigation. The reported dissatisfaction with prioritization of police resources that was investigated by the Grand Jury should be distinguished from the formal Page 5 of 27 as verify statements received from others during our investigation. complaint investigation process, which is diligently followed by the City/SLOPD. (See California Penal Code Section 832.5.) 5 We were blocked in this effort by two senior police official’s [sic] unwillingness to grant an interview. The Grand Jury interviewed the City Chief of Police and its Public Affairs Manager, both providing extensive and sworn testimony. These two staff members are the City’s most knowledgeable on the strategic, operational, prioritization and historical perspectives of law enforcement and community relations related to the student impacts on City residents and activities. The Grand Jury chose not to subpoena any witnesses and there was no need for additional City staff to divert scarce operational resources toward likely incomplete and/or duplicative appearances that would have been inefficient and operationally unsupportable based on the City’s understanding of the scope of inquiry. In addition, the police department provided hundreds of requested records and communications, and responded to multiple sets of subsequent and follow-up questions to accurately clarify and verify any and all information requested by or testimony provided to the Grand Jury, which reflects the most complete and accurate source of information. 5-6 In 2024 fireworks were set off in the Alta Vista neighborhood between 3:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., jolting some residents and their families awake. This incident is unverified. On March 16, 2024, the City received approximately 30 noise/party calls for service between 02:15am and 08:00am. None of those calls indicated fireworks were heard. 6 The damage was so extensive that Cal Poly had to close some dorms for two days to repair the damage. This statement is incorrect. Muir residence hall closed for a few hours and was reopened the same day to residents. 6 No representatives from the surrounding neighborhoods were invited to participate in the task force. The City, Cal Poly, and representatives of the community, including representatives of the Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN) group, and members of the public, participate in monthly Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) meetings where town-gown issues are discussed. Following the 2024 St. Patrick’s Day event and at the request of the San Luis Obispo City Manager, all SCLC agendas had a standing item for reports to be provided by both the City and Cal Poly regarding Page 6 of 27 their preparations and work to address St. Patrick’s Day. To the extent that outcomes from the task force meetings could be shared with the group, they were at that time, on a monthly basis. During these monthly meetings, SCLC members and the public were provided opportunities to ask questions and provide feedback. Additionally, several City officials met with RQN representatives well in advance of the 2025 St. Patrick’s Day event to discuss detailed information regarding the City’s preparations. 7 The City of SLO, concerned about the safety of their neighborhoods, the disruptions to the residents, and the negative image of the City of SLO, developed their own task force headed up by the SLO City Police Department. Although work was done throughout the year to prepare for the 2025 St. Fratty’s Day event, there was no SLOPD “Task Force” officially formed. SLOP D engaged in the same planning and preparation process as in prior years, but with a larger response planned for 2025, which included coordination with other law enforcement agencies, Cal Poly, and other City departments such as Fire, Public Works, and Parks & Recreation. 7 The messaging developed by the City of SLO was “Do Not Come, the party is over.” The $125,000 cost estimate listed at the end of this paragraph in the report includes the marketing costs for 2025. The communication plan was extensive with staff spending approximately 40 hours in the months leading up to St. Patrick’s Day speaking to student groups on campus about the Safety Enhancement Zone and communicating to them what to expect. TV ads, radio ads, “every door direct mail” postcards to 8000 addresses, additional postcards handed out by patrol, paid social ads, message boards, three radio station in-person interviews, and Adam Montiel's podcast were all completed to inform students prior to the day of the event. It should also be noted that the City participates annually in Cal Poly Day Week of Welcome to inform and set conduct expectations with each successive year of new students to Cal Poly, and has done so for many, many years. 7 In 2025, the SLO Police Department activated the Emergency Operations Center (EOC)… Cal Poly activated their EOC. The City activated a Department Operations Center (DOC) at the Police Department, which is different from the City’s Emergency Operations Center, so this is an inaccurate statement as to the City. Page 7 of 27 7 Due to the increased law enforcement presence, the neighborhood of Alta Vista did not experience damage to property and there was no unsanctioned street party. The phrasing here suggests that the number of officers was the only factor in the reduction of disturbances, leaving out important details about the work and effort SLOPD did to prepare a plan, broadly communicate, and execute it with coordination and support from multiple other City departments as well as many other agencies. Multiple patrol methods were used including foot patrols, bicycle patrols, motorcycle patrols and mounted horse patrols. Walkways and access routes to and from campus were manned with officers and signs/barriers, directing revelers back out of the area. In addition, rental lighting and electronic street signage were deployed in the area to improve safety and inform visitors of the enforcement activities. A nearby Law Enforcement field campus included support services, a mobile booking station staffed by the San Luis Obispo Sheriff's Office, as well as Fire Department personnel for medical support, and City Public Works personnel for any road closure needs. The Police department used extensive mobile surveillance cameras mounted on street poles, and multiple drones to provide live video feeds back to the DOC. SLOPD also leveraged relationships with AT&T and Verizon to provide increased bandwith and network monitoring to ensure communications capabilities during the event. The National Guard also assisted by providing technology support used to track officers in the field for situational awareness as to their locations. The CHP also assisted on the night prior to the event by conducting a DUI checkpoint and screened over 1000 vehicles to deter partying in the hours leading up to the event. 7 The SLO Chief of Police Department estimated costs to the city will be approximately $125,000. This estimate does not include any costs borne by other Law Enforcement agencies who assisted and did not charge the City for their time. The $125,000 number also does not include any City personnel who were already scheduled to work, as it was calculated on overtime and equipment/logistics needed for the event. Page 8 of 27 7 The concert at Cal Poly was deemed a success as over 6,000 students attended the event. The event was limited to 5,000 students; however, un- ticketed students pushed through the temporary fencing so they could get into the event. Though this is concerning, no one was seriously injured. When the fence around the event was breached, Cal Poly EOC requested help from the SLOPD DOC as they needed more officers to manage the crowd. Two 12-Officer teams were immediately sent to respond to the concert venue and help restore order. 7 The alternative activity on campus ended around 10:30 a.m. The report does not include an estimate of Cal Poly’s costs to host the concert/alternative activity, which have been made publicly available. This data would seem to be important to facilitate fully informed community-wide assessment of the relative costs and benefits of the comprehensive prevention and response effort. 8 SLO Municipal Code 9.12 (see Bibliography) provides that “…it shall be unlawful for any person to willfully or negligently make or continue to make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, or permit or allow to be made or continued any noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which causes any discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity in the area.” This quote is from section 9.12.040 of the SLO Municipal Code. 8 The specific code violation encompassed in the above-mentioned Code states that the hours between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following morning are to remain quiet. The reference to the 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. timeframe is in SLO Municipal Code section 9.12.050 and technically only applies to: “Radios, Television Sets, Musical Instruments and Similar Devices. Operating, playing or permitting the operation or playing of any radio, television set, phonograph, drum, musical instrument, or similar device which Page 9 of 27 produces or reproduces sound.” There is a similar provision in a separate section that restricts construction noise during the same timeframe. 8 It should also be noted that the Noise Control Officer may grant exceptions to this restriction. SLO Municipal Code section 9.12.100 provides for an exception process that requires a permit application and establishing criteria by which either the SLOPD Chief or the Community Development Director may grant exceptions. The sentence quoted here does not reflect the correct permitting and approval process required for the exception. 8-9 …noise citations in neighborhoods near the campus were issued an average of more than 3 times per week during the school session. This totaled 139 citations in the Alta Vista neighborhood, with one house alone receiving 17 citations. Unfortunately, there is reason to believe that this situation remains - to this date - unabated. Such is the irritation of area residents, that many have fled the area. There has been a 50% reduction in noise calls received by SLOPD over the past 10 years. It is important for the report to acknowledge that the problem was much worse, and great effort has been made to achieve this reduction in calls for service. Use of phrases like “fully enforced” and “unabated” implies an expectation that there should be no noise complaint calls from any neighborhood, which is unreasonable and unattainable. There is also ambiguity as to the timeframe of these citation numbers and to what property the 17 citations were issued. Please clarify what data points are being cited here as our data does not support this conclusion. In contradiction to the statement that noise violations are being allowed to continue “unabated,” the City’s Planning Commission revoked two CUPs for fraternities near campus (1236 Monte Vista Place and 1304 Foothill Blvd) on June 11, 2025, in part due to noise violations. The Planning Commission is reviewing a third fraternity CUP for modification or revocation on June 25, 2025. The City has also cited multiple houses for illegal fraternity operations in R-1 zones as result of noise complaints, and dozens of citations are issued each year. 9 To aid in noise ordinance enforcement the SLOPD employs the assistance of Cal Poly students who are enrolled in a SNAP Officers are City employees, not enrolled in any school program, and are a mix of Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and Hancock College students. Page 10 of 27 program called the Student Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP). 9 These students interface with groups of partiers in residences in the affected area who are violating the noise ordinance. SNAP Officers respond to noise complaints city-wide, not just adjacent to campus. 9 These unarmed SNAP students speak to the offending parties and attempt to get them to comply with the city’s noise standards. There are, however, only a handful of SNAP students. They wear civilian uniforms and work in pairs. They also have radios so that they may contact the police when required. SNAP are student civilian employees of the Police Department who operate as a first response to noise calls. Their primary objective is to educate residents about the City’s noise ordinance, issue a written warning where appropriate, and gain compliance to end the noise disturbance, thus keeping sworn officers free to handle other public safety calls for service. SNAP employees do not carry weapons, and they wear polo shirts and pants. If residents are uncooperative or the situation appears dangerous, they are trained to request officers to respond. 9 These students may, at their discretion, issue Disturbance Advisement Cards (DACs). SNAP and patrol both issue DACs, with SNAP alone issuing 588 DACs in 2024. Officer discretion is guided by Lexipol policy 430 and other training (see SNAP manual Section V: Noise Complaint Enforcement & Safety Expectations). 9 Complainants indicated that weekend parties can mean up to 100 or more students at one address and often continue after visits by police. SNAP students do not go to lettered fraternity houses; such visits are reserved for sworn officers. Responding officers can issue a citation for a party as either multiple citations at the same time or as additional citations if the problem persists. There was one unruly gathering citation during the St. Fratty's Day 2025 event, and 22 Unruly Gathering citations issued in 2024. Unruly Gathering citations are used for very large parties that meet defined criteria in the municipal code that cause significant disturbance to the neighborhood. 9 SLO Municipal Code 9.12.050 is specific about excessive noise. It provides a detailed list of prohibited acts between the hours of 10 p.m. and Various City Municipal Code sections are being conflated in these sentences. Sections 9.12.040, 9.12.050.A, and 9.12.050.B regulate different types of sound sources and are applied in different contexts, not all relevant to party noise situations. Page 11 of 27 7 a.m. While it does not specifically prohibit noise from parties, it does speak to the use of loudspeakers and other electronic devices, including: “radio, television set, phonograph, drum, musical instrument, or similar device which produces or reproduces sound…” 10 If found to be out of compliance, SLOPD may issue a warning or citation. Citations can be either criminal or administrative, but most often noise violations are citated administratively. 10 In 2023, using extensive citizen- generated data from a Cal Poly- generated report required by AB524, code enforcement started an investigation into the illegal fraternities. Based on the investigation, 30-40 Advisory Notices, and 22 Notice of Violations (NOVs) were sent to property owners. In addition, there have been 22 NOVs and 6 administrative citations issued since the 2023 investigation related to unpermitted fraternities or use permit violations. 10 At the time, Cal Poly and code enforcement were working together on the illegal fraternity issue. However, due to changes in policies, Cal Poly stopped assisting the city, stating privacy concerns, and revised their AB 524 report to remove some of the addresses that were previously provided in the document. Cal Poly has removed information about the location of parties from its public reports, which previously facilitated the City’s enforcement of its regulations. Outside of the AB 524 report, the City has requested the information directly from Cal Poly, but those requests have been denied. Page 12 of 27 11 Based on the SLOCGJ investigation, the number of illegal fraternities may be more than 40 locations currently operating in the city. In addition, citizens have reported that several Cal Poly recognized fraternities listed in AB524 have multiple illegal fraternity locations operating within the city: some with as many as 7 separate locations. Please clarify from what sources these numbers are derived and on what verified evidence they are based, keeping in mind the constitutional considerations/limitations noted below in response to report finding #3. 11-12 Code enforcement complaints are often received after business hours or the following day. The result is that they are limited in their ability to verify the code violation, as it is after the fact or violators are not easily identified. Party activities reported to police are documented and provided to code enforcement, and there is no barrier to the City using all of the information in the possession of either the Police Department or the Community Development Department to pursue enforcement. It is inaccurate to state the City cannot verify violations without sending code enforcement staff out on weekends or after hours; noise complaints received by emergency or non-emergency dispatch after hours are responded to by SLOPD and call logs and citations issued by the Police Department are evidence of that response. 13 The report also provides the address of each “affiliated chapter house” which AB 524 defines as those located on- campus or on land owned or leased by the fraternity or sorority. Education Code Section 66312 defines “chapter house” as “any residence located on or off campus that is owned by the institution of higher education but occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity, or any residence located on or off campus that is owned and occupied by the campus-recognized sorority or fraternity.” There is no definition of an “affiliated chapter house” in the Education Code. The Education Code’s definition of chapter house is confined to properties owned and occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity, or occupied by a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity and owned by the university. Page 13 of 27 13 Evidently, this means that of the 36 recognized fraternities and sororities, 20 either do not have a chapter house or are in chapter houses that are off- campus and not owned or leased by the fraternity or sorority and therefore do not meet the definition of an affiliated chapter house. Clarify whether “chapter house” as used here is meant to refer to “unaffiliated chapter houses,” and by what definition this is being applied. 13 Any of these chapter houses that hold fraternity activities such as meetings, rush events, or parties, are still required by the SLO municipal code to have a CUP. Clarify if a distinction is being made between affiliated and unaffiliated chapter houses. 13-14 Since Cal Poly is not required to provide the addresses of these recognized fraternities, the city has no easy way to verify the location to determine the reason that the fraternity does not have a CUP. This makes it difficult for the city to enforce the code. It is legally debatable whether the addresses should be published and/or disclosed or not, but it is true that since Cal Poly now declines to provide specific address information regarding locations of all fraternity/sorority sponsored events, this does impede the City’s enforcement efforts. 14 These CUPs were approved over an extended period of time by planning commissions with different members; the earliest is dated in 1971 and the latest in 2024. That may explain why additional conditions were imposed on some fraternities and sororities and not others. It may also have to do with specific characteristics of the individual parcel. The differences in the CUPs also reflect regulatory changes to the City Municipal Code that have been made to address issues that have arisen with the fraternities and sororities over time. This is the nature of any CUP and CUP process; it allows for adjustments over time to address emergent needs through the exercise of discretion, individual review, and application of conditions of approval that are tailored to the unique potential impacts of each location as it is reviewed. Page 14 of 27 14 The planning commission has the authority to enforce these conditions, add new conditions if the existing conditions are not met, and ultimately revoke a fraternity’s CUP. It is within the authority of the City’s Planning Commission to take the steps described, but these are part of a process that also includes notice and due process to the permit holder and property owner. CUPs cannot be revoked without due process to the permit holder, which holds a property right to the permit. 14 Citizens can also appeal for a use permit to be revoked or request that a permit not be approved. The current cost to make such an appeal is $2,583.46, (in 2017 the appeal fee was $281.00). A complainant noted that the cost to appeal discourages this practice. The cost described here is what a citizen would pay to appeal any decision of the Planning Commission immediately after a CUP is approved or denied. There is also a process that costs no money through which a member of the public can report potential CUP or zoning violations to the Community Development Director. Once investigated, City staff can bring substantiated violations before the Planning Commission for consideration without any cost incurred by the citizen. This process has led to the revocation of two CUPs this year, and several other CUPs are either scheduled proactively by the City for a future hearing or are being investigated based on violations of conditions. 14-15 While these appeal fees may be justifiable for major development projects that demand substantial city resources like legal reviews, public hearings, or environmental impact assessments, they place an undue burden on ordinary citizens. As stated above, a member of the public does not need to pay a fee to make the Community Development Department aware of a potential violation of a CUP, which, if verified, can lead to re-review of the permit by the Planning Commission, and potential revocation. The appeal fees apply to the granting (or denial) of a CUP. The setting of fees, including the appeal fees referred to here, follows an extensive study process, reporting by staff, and deliberation by City Council, with fees based specifically on a fraction of the cost of processing an appeal. 15, F1 Prior to 2025, the city failed to effectively provide a multi-pronged, cohesive approach to manage or shut down large unsanctioned, costly and unruly events such as St. Fratty’s Day. This created an unsafe environment, SLOPD had a robust plan in 2024, based on the size and actions of the 2023 event. The City must balance police response vs. expected crowd size, danger to the community and financial constraints. It is not operationally or financially feasible to call in officers from all over the state every year out because something might happen. The need must be articulated based on intelligence and past experience, and the 2023 Page 15 of 27 with increasing size of unruly crowds, property damage, injuries and public disturbances. event did not rise to the level of problems to create a state-wide staffing aid request in 2024. Each year’s staffing and tactical plan is prudent and appropriate based on previous events and current expected attendance. The San Luis Obispo Police Department has effectively planned for and staffed numerous large-scale, unpermitted events dating back decades, including the end of Mardi Gras and Poly Royal events. Those events were distinctly different as they were permitted, official events that turned problematic. St. Fratty’s day started organically, has never been permitted, and has slowly grown over the years, with the exception of the COVID-19 pandemic years, where participation sharply declined. Each year, the Police Department engaged in significant community outreach, including print material, directed communication through Cal Poly and Cuesta Colleges, radio ads, door to door knock and talks, met with community organizations including RQN, and authored several media releases, ahead of the unpermitted St. Fratty’s Day event. The City changed the Municipal Code multiple times to increase fines as a means to deter problematic behavior (the Safety Enhancement Zone was amended in 2010 to include Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day, then amended again in February 2024, expanding the Safety Enhancement Zone to include two weekends prior to St. Patrick’s Day to cover the likely dates for St. Fratty’s Day). Robust operational plans were developed each year, in collaboration with Cal Poly, to staff public safety personnel in a meaningful and effective way. St. Fratty’s Day is a particularly difficult event to police, as it consists of revelers walking up and down the sidewalk, with no destination in mind. Short of completely shutting down a neighborhood to all traffic, both foot and vehicular, there are few options police have for preventing what would normally be constitutionally protected activity: walking down a sidewalk in a neighborhood. To further complicate enforcement, many of the revelers Page 16 of 27 actually live in the very neighborhoods that would be closed and would have to be provided access to their homes. As the event grew in scale, so did the public safety response. 2020-2021 saw minimal St. Fratty’s Day activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was not until 2023 that any extended street closure occurred due to the size of the crowd in the neighborhood. As a result of the increased crowds, the Safety Enhancement Zone was expanded, along with other tactical operational planning to prevent another occurrence. As the crowds in 2024 grew even larger, the departmental staffing became no longer sufficient to safely keep the crowds out of the streets and neighborhoods, resulting in extensive planning for 2025. 2025 planning included working with Cal Poly on a task force that met for almost one full year prior to March 2025. Extensive outreach was conducted, and a request for mutual aid was sent to many agencies across the state. There were over 300 law enforcement personnel in town working the 2025 St. Fratty’s Day event, along with additional personnel at Cal Poly Campus to provide security for the campus dorms and the alternative concert event planned on campus. Officers assisted from as far away as San Francisco and Ventura to ensure enough law enforcement presence in the neighborhood. As a result, although some revelers attempted to go into the street in 2025, no intersections or streets were closed to traffic due to revelers, and the party was effectively shut down, before it started and without incident. For many years, the department has also utilized advanced technology such as drones, and mobile surveillance cameras, along with print materials, street signage and targeted outreach to problem houses in an effort to deter the event. Department leadership worked in collaboration with SCLC monthly and met with the IFC (Intra-Fraternity Council) to engage in productive conversation to gain compliance and warn of the fines and Page 17 of 27 administrative sanctions that could come with illegal behavior. SLOPD Leadership were guests on several radio shows in an effort to distribute the message of zero tolerance ahead of the unplanned, unpermitted event, and participated in town-hall style meetings on campus with Cal Poly leadership and other City officials. In summation, the department conducted an outreach campaign as extensive as possible, and employed law enforcement officers from across the state, including horse-mounted patrols, motorcycle patrols, bicycle patrols, foot patrols and mobile teams to effectively end any problems early and quickly. The department fully staffed an Operations Center to function as a command post, and in conjunction with the San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Office, created a Law Enforcement Campus near the event, for mobile booking and processing of arrestees. The combination of operational planning, use of technology and infrastructure, and the assistance from law enforcement partners from around the state, resulted in an extremely safe and trouble-free event. The crowd was not able to develop at any one location in the neighborhoods, and there were no reported cases of property damage or injuries. In short, 2025 was an extreme success in quelling the event, which was the culmination of years of iteration and planning. The City spent over $100,000 in overtime and equipment related to the event. This amount does not include all of the staff time of everyone who was working their normal shift, or all of the other agencies, who supplied their personnel as no-cost mutual-aid. The total cost of the St. Fratty’s Day response was likely in the $700,000-$800,000 range when accounting for all staff time associated with anyone working the event. 2025 was the result of process evolution built upon years of previous plans, lessons learned, and extensive personal relationships built with student, law enforcement, and neighborhood community members Page 18 of 27 resulting in a least-harm approach to preventing what could have been a highly dangerous event. Additionally, for many years, the City has engaged in extensive outreach and education each year with Cal Poly to elevate awareness of City codes and conduct expectations, as well as engaging in robust enforcement against individuals engaging in misconduct, as well as landlords whose tenants engage in repeat violations at the landlords’ rental premises. The City notes that it has continued enforcement of its landlord responsibility provisions for properties that host repeat code violations, notwithstanding ongoing landlord and tenant opposition and even in the face of threats of legal challenges. 15, F2 The city has not effectively engaged in working together with community stakeholders to find solutions for ongoing off-campus issues that negatively impact neighborhoods such as code enforcement, noise issues, trespassing, property damage, and unruly events. Neighborhood Wellness was a Major City Goal (MCG) from 2011-2017 and then an Other Important Objective (OIO) from 2017-2019. During that time, the Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group was established and the 90-page report produced. Working groups included neighbors from areas directly off campus, students, City staff and Cal Poly staff. SLOPD, City Administration, and elected representatives of the City Council frequently meet with RQN and participate in SCLC. The Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group report contained recommendations, many of which were adopted by the City. Prior to adoption of the MCG, the social host ordinance was adopted in 2009, stating that party hosts can be held responsible for underage drinking at their parties. In 2010, the City Council adopted amendments to the noise ordinance. Instead of multiple warnings, one warning is provided, then the house goes on the premise list for 9 months and if more complaints are received, and violations verified, citations are issued. The fine structure was changed to $350 - $1000 and landlord Page 19 of 27 citations were added for repeat offenders. A Cal Poly - City MOU was adopted giving Cal Poly Police administrative citation powers a mile off campus. Party registration was piloted in 2017 and has been going strong since. Stakeholder walking meetings were implemented in the neighborhoods led by Cal Poly to provide residents the opportunity to give feedback on problem locations, though the walking meetings were not revived after COVID. The unruly gathering (UG) ordinance was amended, improving the definition of what a UG is, and Start of School safety enhancement was added in 2015. The City did not implement the keg registration recommendation contained in the Working Group Report because students no longer use kegs like they did in the 90s, nor did the City implement SNAP ride-alongs because SNAP employees are not sworn police officers. Even after the MCG and OIO expired, extensive amendments were made in 2024 to the safety enhancement zones for Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day to include additional weekends of enforcement. Partnerships between the police department and Cal Poly expanded to include focused outreach to incoming students during SLO Days, presentations and outreach to Fraternity and Sorority Life (FSL) chapters, outreach to sports teams and coaching staff and participation in off-campus housing fairs. Annually, the Public Affairs Manager presents to all 5000+ incoming new students and about half of all FSL individual chapters covering city ordinances that most effect students living on and off campus. In 2017, Council approved a pilot party registration program which has since proven to be very successful in reducing noisy parties and improving student-age City resident understanding of how to socialize without being disruptive. In 2024, the St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween safety enhancement zones were amended by Council to include additional dates which provide the police department a longer span of enforcement to better address negative Page 20 of 27 behaviors in the neighborhoods. Extensive communications plans are created and implemented to provide information to the community about neighborhood related ordinances, with the plans including postcard mailings, radio commercials and PSAs, TV commercials, on and off campus presentations to student groups, noise violations notifications to property owners, posters and flyers throughout the community and electronic communication via police department social media channels including paid ads targeted to college-age residents of the City. Additionally, noise and unruly gathering information is provided weekly to Cal Poly to be addressed via the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities (OSRR). OSRR is also provided information on students who have been arrested for crimes in San Luis Obispo, such as suspected DUI, domestic violence, theft and assault. In addition, the City works extensively with Cal Poly on finding solutions for these issues. The SCLC is an additional venue for discussion, dialogue, and collaboration. The City is committed to ongoing engagement with a variety of community stakeholders related to neighborhood issues. More recently, City staff have participated in the following collaborative efforts:  January 10, 2024: City staff with Cal Poly Greek Life staff to discuss the complaints received regarding Fraternities and Sororities. Page 21 of 27  April 10, 2024: Follow up meeting with Assistant Director of Fraternity & Sorority Life regarding City’s response to unpermitted fraternities.  April 16, 2024: Presentation to Greek Organization Leadership regarding City regulations and enforcement methods for Fraternities/Sororities  August 2024: Community Development Director met with Cal Poly leadership to discuss the issue of Fraternities/Sororities and land use requirements for houses.  January 12, 2025: Presentation to Greek Organization Leadership regarding City regulations and enforcement methods for Fraternities/Sororities  March 4, 2025: Meeting with City staff and Cal Poly Greek Life staff to discuss the ongoing issues regarding Fraternities and Sororities and upcoming “St. Fratty’s Day” event. In addition to these scheduled meetings, code enforcement staff have met with numerous fraternity members as part of several investigations into alleged unpermitted events. During field inspections and hand delivery of violation notices, residents were verbally provided information regarding applicable regulations. City staff have clearly stated to Cal Poly that staff are available to attend events to educate students on compliance with City regulations. The Police Department specifically has worked tirelessly over the past decade to address these issues, supported by dedicated staff, new City ordinances, and proven programs that have delivered undeniable positive results. Noise complaints in particular have steadily declined to their lowest recorded levels, while voluntary compliance continues to Page 22 of 27 increase. In 2010, Council adopted revisions to the City’s noise ordinance, improving the definitions, raising the fines for violations, and adding a provision to include landlord penalties for repeat violations at individual properties. Since the change in the ordinance, there has been a 50% reduction in noise complaints. Prior to 2010, the police department would receive on average 3000 noisy party complaints each year and the average is now around 1450. 15, F3 The city has failed to effectively enforce municipal codes that prohibit fraternity and sorority activity in R-1/R- 2 zones in part due to the difficulty in identifying houses that are hosting fraternity-type events, such as rush events and repeated parties. This inaction has resulted in an increase of illegal fraternities holding events in residential neighborhoods making these areas almost unlivable for most residents. Along with the Cal Poly general enrollment numbers, participation in Greek life has also increased; with an increase in membership would understandably follow an increase in activity. The City enforces municipal code regulations that prohibit fraternity and sorority activity in R-1 and R-2 zones and behaviors that create neighborhood nuisances or otherwise violate City code, while balancing constitutionally protected rights of privacy and free association (specifically, keeping in mind that there are legal limits on a governmental entity’s ability to inquire into the personal relationships of persons living together in their private residences and to regulate the rights of such individuals to associate freely in their homes). The enforcement of these regulations is carried out on a complaint basis, consistent with most code enforcement issues. Since November 2023, the City has investigated over 103 complaints and opened 40 code enforcement cases related to fraternities without permits and violations of conditional use permits. In addition, the City proactively notified 33 suspected fraternity/sorority houses in R-1/R-2 zones that it is illegal to be a fraternity/sorority house in an R1/R2 zone through a courtesy notice. The City has proactively met with Cal Poly staff and students to provide education about compliance with zoning regulations so that Greek organizations can plan living arrangements accordingly, and so that students are aware that they will receive violations if they establish Page 23 of 27 fraternity/sorority houses in these zones. The City has also been attempting to obtain Greek event registration address information from Cal Poly in order to support enforcement efforts. There is no cited evidence to support what appears to be an individualized opinion that these neighborhoods are “almost unlivable” for residents and such value judgments presented as factual investigation or inquiry undermine the objectivity and credibility of the report’s analytical approach and conclusions. Cal Poly could substantially aid and enhance the effectiveness of the City’s prevention and enforcement efforts in addressing repeat or habitual misconduct by campus affiliated individuals and groups that occupy properties within the city through increased exchange of information regarding Greek event locations and through enhanced enforcement of its own student conduct measures. 15, F4 The city has failed to consistently enforce CUPs such as the requirements for an annual list of parties and events, notification to neighbors, and parking plans. Strict enforcement of these conditions would contribute to a reduction of the disturbances in the neighborhoods. The City enforces the provisions of CUPs as violations are reported and verified. In the last year, the City verified that 5 fraternities have violations of existing CUPs. This resulted in 3 hearings before the Planning Commission for revocation/revision of the CUPs in question, with additional hearings scheduled in upcoming months. In May 2025, the Planning Commission voted to revoke the CUPs for two fraternity houses due to violations of conditions of approval. 16, F5 The current planning appeal fee structure in SLO disproportionately impacts ordinary citizens, as the high costs create barriers for those raising concerns about community issues such as noise or safety. While these fees may be justifiable for large-scale As stated previously, the planning appeal fee described in the report is what a citizen would pay to appeal any decision of the Planning Commission. It costs nothing to report potential CUP or zoning violations to the Community Development Director. Once investigated, City staff would bring substantiated violations before the Planning Commission for consideration without any cost incurred by the citizen. This exact process has resulted in the re-review of several CUPs this year. Page 24 of 27 development appeals requiring additional city resources, they hinder equitable participation in local decision-making processes. It is an incredibly important distinction to make that citizens raising concerns about noise or safety is free. The appeal fee only applies to a decision on a CUP before the PC. In addition, the appeal fee structure was adopted by the City Council in 2024 after robust review of cost-of-service data presented in the associated fee study and report and following significant deliberation by the City Council regarding the fee amount. The Council carefully considered how much the fee should be subsidized in order to not discourage the involvement of ordinary citizens in the decision-making process. The fee is the same regardless of the status of the appealing party (whether a developer, city resident, non-city resident, etc.) and therefore does not disproportionately impact any specific party. The appeal fee is based on an analysis of the amount of time required to process an appeal, and, per City Council direction, the fee was set at a percentage of the full cost of processing an appeal in order to ensure it is not overly burdensome. 16, F6 The Grand Jury encountered a lack of cooperation from the San Luis Obispo City Police Department. While one sworn officer did participate in an interview, efforts to interview two additional sworn officers were unsuccessful. This unwillingness to engage hindered the Grand Jury’s ability to corroborate statements, obtain essential information, and maintain transparency in its oversight role. One of the City’s most knowledgeable persons on these topics is a non- sworn staff member and was interviewed for 90 minutes. The City provided its two most knowledgeable people (with the “one sworn Officer” being the Chief of Police) to be interviewed. No subpoenas were issued to Police staff. This is a false statement – The police department provided unimpeded and direct access to both the Chief of Police and the Public Affairs Manager, as well as written responses to multiple iterative series of questions, as well as providing documents with thousands of current and historical data points requested by the Grand Jury. Neither the City nor any particular City police department personnel was ever served with a subpoena for additional witnesses, documents, or data. The department Page 25 of 27 did decline further voluntary requests for additional interviews of department staff by the Grand Jury after complete access was already provided to the department’s Chief, the City Manager who supervises the Chief, and the civilian police department staff person who were best informed as to all relevant operations to speak most comprehensively about the issues the City understood were being investigated. Both agency representatives and the City Manager engaged thoroughly and exhaustively, responding to all questions submitted in person and in writing from the Grand Jury, on multiple occasions. The police department did not elect to “voluntarily” provide access to other shift working staff who have limited scopes of operational responsibility or, at best, incomplete historical information or who were themselves unable to speak with completeness or accuracy about current planning efforts for what was at the time the upcoming 2025 St. Patrick’s Day Celebration. The finding misrepresents the transparency and cooperation the police department and the City as a whole extended to the Grand Jury to complete the most accurate and comprehensive report possible on this dangerous and nuisance event for our community. The department has been extremely proactive in combatting this event and in providing critical information to the Grand Jury, Cal Poly, the City Council, and our community to reduce and ultimately prevent the dangerous street party, which was in fact accomplished this year, exceeding all expectations. 17, R6 The SLO City Manager and the Planning Commission should move toward adopting more uniform conditions for CUP’s [sic] and enforcement of existing requirements. As CUPs come in for re-review staff are ensuring that they are as consistent as possible with the new set of standard conditions the City has created, with uniform conditions being updated as needed. Setting constraints like a uniform set of conditions on the exercise of discretion diminishes the usefulness of the review process to address specific needs over time or for unique circumstances that may exist at specific properties or with particular groups or organizations. Page 26 of 27 17, R7 The SLOCGJ recommends that the SLO City Manager create formal guidelines and provide training outlining how the SLO City Police Department will respond to requests from the SLOCGJ and other oversite bodies. Grand jury requests vary in nature and scope and, by their nature, do not lend themselves to a uniform approach in each instance. The Police Chief is supervised by and accountable to the City Manager and the City Manager has and will continue to review and provide appropriate oversight and direction to her staff in providing staff responses, consulting with the City Attorney as needed. In the event a particular request directed to the police department demanded confidentiality from the City Manager, the City Attorney’s Office would review and advise the Department’s response and support communication to the City Council. 24-26 Bibliography Links are to general websites and not specific reference materials. No specific citations exist in the report. Some of the links do not appear to actually contain the information that they are being relied upon to support in the report. In addition to these specific factual corrections offered in the table above, we believe the overall tone of the report could be improved by removing language (e.g. comparing City zoning to the Twilight Zone television show) which trivializes both the serious issues for the neighborhoods and the tremendous ongoing resource investments made (past and present) by the City to address those concerns. The report also suffers from the recurring use of ambiguous phrases and references stated as facts, which do not seem to be connected to factual support or contextual or temporal data points, thereby diminishing the objectivity, credibility, and impact of the conclusions in the report. Some examples are: • “a quaint town with a rich history” • “once-quiet residential areas” • “residents—students, families, and long-time locals” • “a range of challenges for the surrounding neighborhoods” • “neighborhood integrity” Page 27 of 27 • “fully enforced” • “this situation remains - to this date - unabated” • “the affected area” • “warrant a police citation” • “a real time solution” The City recommends replacing those phrases with more precise language or providing the noted factual, temporal, or contextual support for the statements. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these clarifications, recommendations, and suggestions for the report before it is released to the public. We fully support the effort to provide the public with a complete and accurate picture of the issues raised in the complaints that gave rise to this report, and we hope our recommendations assist in that effort. 80 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:18 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can someone please send me the factual inaccuracies we sent to the grand jury on 6/20? I do not have a copy. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:16 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Importance: High This looks perfect to me, thank you!! Please go ahead and send to Bulbul and also let her know that we understand she has reached out to individual Council Members and that this is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City at this time. Thank you, all!! From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:49 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi all, Please see a revised holding statement below based on all of the feedback. It is also in the linked document. 81 This is intended to just provide an initial response to meet the current deadline and provide time for us to complete our full response. I agree with Whit’s recommendation that we send a release out to the media and public when our response is completed with the other information folks have put in the document. That should be done in concert with a full communications plan which Whit is happy to draft. Whitney, let us know if this is good to go and we can send to Bulbul. Greg From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:30 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit. Helpful뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager 82 E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? 83 Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica 84 Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. 85 Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 86 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:16 AM To:Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Szentesi, Whit; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO This looks perfect to me, thank you!! Please go ahead and send to Bulbul and also let her know that we understand she has reached out to individual Council Members and that this is intended to provide our collective response on behalf of the City at this time. Thank you, all!! From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:49 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi all, Please see a revised holding statement below based on all of the feedback. It is also in the linked document. This is intended to just provide an initial response to meet the current deadline and provide time for us to complete our full response. I agree with Whit’s recommendation that we send a release out to the media and public when our response is completed with the other information folks have put in the document. That should be done in concert with a full communications plan which Whit is happy to draft. Whitney, let us know if this is good to go and we can send to Bulbul. Greg From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:30 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit. Helpful뇤눎눐눑눒눏 87 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers 88 City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM 89 To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, 90 I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 91 From:Terry Reeves < Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:10 AM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Planning Commission 6/25/25 Item 4a. June 25, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission 976 Osos St., Room 200 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 To the Honorable Members of the City of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission: On behalf of the Delta Upsilon/Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation, I am writing in support to renewal of the Conditional Use Permit granted to the Delta Upsilon Fraternity operating at 720 Foothill Boulevard. We understand that this is a serious issue that demands ful l attention from the undergraduate active chapter and the alumni organization which owns the property. It’s no secret. Students and residents in college towns all over America exist in a sort of love/hate relationship. There is so much to love in college towns and to any resident or alumni, San Luis Obispo is the top of Mt Everest. What’s not to love? Whether it’s the small college town vibe, the feeling of a forever young community, or all the business the college brings in, everyone loves Cal Poly SLO. With that said, Cal Poly and San Luis Obispo have a student population problem. Enrollment is continually increasing and while they are working at it, campus housing has not been able to keep up. More and more students are having to find off-campus housing and the strain it has on City residents is more pronounced now than it has ever been. More students lead to young adults learning to live on their own, and City residents wondering how to control them. So how do fraternities fit in? To some in the community, fraternities don’t. They have a vision that if fraternities were gone, noise issues would disappear, parties would be non-existent, and every student would be the nice little neighbor we all hope for. Contrary to those misled beliefs, we would argue fraternities are much more than the neighborhood nuisance they are continually made out to be. We believe fraternities are an olive branch, which through philanthropic events and community outreach give back to their community at a rate much higher than non-Greek organizations. For more than 70 years, Cal Poly Chapter of Delta Upsilon International Fraternity has been a part of the fabric of San Luis Obispo; and our Chapter has never been stronger. Since 1955, Delta Upsilon has been shaping highly motivated, fully developed, creative, hardworking and deeply committed young men into model pillars of the community. Our brotherhood includes CEOs, doctors, lawyers, politicians, and engineers to name a few. What started with 15 young men in 1955, has now grown to a multi-generational organization with over 1,000 alumni and 100 active members. Since our founding as a Chapter, Delta Upsilon (originally founded as Alpha Upsilon) has seen several locations throughout the SLO community. We started on Garden Street in 1956, moved to Marsh Street in the late 50’s (now occupied by Nate’s on Marsh), and then to Palm Street in 1975, until we finally settled at 720 & 726 Foothill Blvd in 1988. 92 Beginning in 2013, the Alumni Corporation self-financed a complete teardown and rebuild to the facility you see today. Prior to rebuilding, we did an exhaustive search of SLO looking for other properties, closer to campus, that would be better suited for a Fraternity House. Ultimately, there was no better location. 720 Foothill is zoned R4, is completely surrounded by R4, sits on an arterial road and has retail commercial across the street. In our view, 720 Foothill was perfect. Today, the Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation owns and maintains a $2 million, 14 room, multifamily residential facility, that provides housing at a rate nearly 10% below market rate for SLO rental housing. This enables many in our chapter, especially those with financial difficulties, the opportunity to afford and graduate from Cal Poly. While our facility does have a Use-Permit to operate as a Fraternity, the primary use is as a residence where for 14 students who live on-site. Our Alumni Corporation provides active mentoring and oversight of the Chapter though our nine-person executive board. While there may be some other Greek Alumni groups operating at Cal Poly, I believe our Corporation is the only one who own our own Chapter House and takes an active role in the mentoring of our Active Chapter. Together, our Alumni Corporation and active brothers have been operating under a City Use-Permit since 1989, and we take the process very seriously. Fraternities are cyclical. Every 4-5 years there is complete active membership turnover, so as Alumni we have a responsibility to the Community and want to ensure that our active chapter understands and follows the rules outlined in the permit. Much like the undergrads, our Alumni Board experiences turnover, contacts change and focus shifts. To help ensure the proper ongoing attention is given to the Use Permit and other zoning issues, our Board is actively working to establish a new position with a primary focus on the Use Permit and all City related issues. Our goal is to ensure that we are in front of any potential issues rather than responding to problems. We are committed to working side by side with the active brothers and the City to ensure that any issues are mitigated in the future and improve student/resident relations. Furthermore, we would like to actively participate in any future workshops or discussions with the City and Community on how to proactively work for a plan that allows us all to coexist. Delta Upsilon is an organization that has had profound influences on generations of young men who have been fortunate enough to study at Cal Poly and experience the amazing City of San Luis Obispo. As a result, we have a strong core of alumni who have a lifelong passion to an organization and City that shaped us during our formative years and there is unwavering dedication to give the same opportunities to the fine young men that are coming through Cal Poly today. At a time when young men face record levels of isolation, confusion about masculinity, and lack of healthy role models, we are a stabilizing force. This further benefits the community in multiple ways:  Academic Excellence contributes to the university’s reputation and overall success  Community Service and Philanthropy directly benefit local nonprofits and families  Leadership Development prepares responsible, civic-minded men  Structured Brotherhood reduces the likelihood of reckless behavior associated with unstructured social circles If we are discouraged from continuing our role on campus and in the community, we risk more than just the loss of tradition. We risk:  Creating a vacuum where unmentored young men are more likely to engage in destructive behaviors  Eliminating a proven structure that holds members to high standards of conduct, academics, and service  Sending a message that excellence, when misunderstood or mischaracterized, will be punished rather than supported 93 With all that said, tonight you are discussing and voting to extend our Use-Permit with modifications, or to revoke it. Yes, there have been some noise complaints (no unruly gatherings) and yes there must be improvement. But while you debate the merits of our application, we ask that you consider our recent merits, our future intentions, and the very real benefits we offer to this city and its people. Delta Upsilon has been part of our neighborhood for over 30 years and we (Alumni and Actives) are committed to improving its health, safety and wellbeing, as well as being standard bearers for all fraternities. We’re committed to:  Open communication with city leaders  Transparent expectations for conduct and responsibility  Hosting events that serve—not disturb—the community  Upholding the highest standards of brotherhood and accountability Our chapter is not perfect, but it is intentional. It is supported. It is accountable. And above all, it is committed to building better men. We thank you for your time and look forward to working with you as we continue to develop young leaders who serve with character, honor, and respect. Respectfully submitted, Terry Reeves, Cal Poly ‘99 President, Alpha Upsilon Alumni Corporation Delta Upsilon International Fraternity, Cal Poly Chapter. -- Terry 94 From:kathie walker < Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:08 AM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Another SLOPD complaint at 720 E. Foothill (Item 4a, Planning Commission 6/25/2025) Planning Commissioners, For the record, the SLOPD log showed yet another noise complaint for a "loud party" at 720 Foothill on Saturday, 6/21/2025. The log shows there was a delay of almost one hour before SLOPD dispatched anyone, and they sent a SNAP employee named "I. Dahmen", shown as Unit P1 on the log. SNAP is not supposed to be dispatched to fraternity houses (or addresses with a previous noise citation within 9 months). 720 Foothill is a fraternity and has also had multiple citations within the past 9 months. It should have been coded as "NOISE POLICE" under "Type" in the upper left corner of the SLOPD call log, as shown below. "NOISE POLICE" requires a response from a sworn officer, but somehow the call was mistakenly input as "Noise Party"; the call was delayed, and SNAP was dispatched. The red arrows show the call on Saturday, 6/21 (top) as Type: "Noise Party," which was changed in SLOPD's database from "NOISE POLICE" (bottom), shown on a previous citation, and all previous calls to 720 E. Foothill Blvd. It looks like SNAP called other SLOPD Units 4248 and 4247. In any event, the noise complaint was ultimately cleared as a negative violation. 95 SLOPD could provide more information about the mix-up and delay, what the complaining party reported hearing, and what the officers observed when they got there, an hour after the call was made on 6/21. This is the 11th noise complaint made for 720 E. Foothill since the beginning of the academic year in September for a loud party or other disturbing noise. 96 From:Dietrick, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:30 AM To:Szentesi, Whit; McDonald, Whitney; Stewart, Erica A; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Thanks Whit. Helpful뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO 97 Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me 98 From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 99 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly 100 San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 101 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:08 AM To:Dietrick, Christine; McDonald, Whitney; Stewart, Erica A; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO I was able to get us an extension. We can respond by noon. — Public Communications Manager City of San Luis Obispo C: 805.440.5446 **Please pardon typos. This message was sent via mobile device. From: Szentesi, Whit Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48:25 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO 102 Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. 103 From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO 104 Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 105 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 106 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 10:00 AM To:Juan Fernandez Cc:Terry Reeves Subject:Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 I’m still free at 10am tomorrow morning. I can host at the PD if you’d like to meet. Best, Christine On Jun 25, 2025, at 9:10 AM, Juan Fernandez < wrote: Good morning Christine- I missed your question about mine and Terry’s roles: he’s the president of the Alumni corporation which owns the property at 720 Foothill and I’m the Active-Alumni advisor helping to connect our graduating members with Alumni who may be good contacts for life post-Cal Poly. We will be presenting to the SLO Planning Commission tonight and hopefully come away with a modification to our use permit. The modification adds verbiage for the actives to notify the Community Development director prior to any planned events that exceed our 23 person limit for regular meetings, study sessions, etc. I presume your availability may have changed since you sent your note- Terry and I both live out of the area so we were hoping to maybe catch a coffee with you tomorrow morning. I’ll reach out tomorrow to setup a Zoom call with you, Terry and I to gather your feedback post Planning Commission decision. Thank you, /juan On Jun 17, 2025, at 08:32, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: I’ve got pretty much all day open. How’s 10am? Can you also share with me what your role is with the fraternity? Are you an alum advisor? Best, Christine 107 From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 9:41 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- I’m so sorry I missed the opportunity to meet today. Father’s day and work schedule blurred my view. Give the 30th is your next availability, I’d like to take that opportunity. As discussed, Delta Upsilon would like to be a lighthouse of collaboration with the City and SLOPD- can you please suggest what time you’d be available? Thank you, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 16:47, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Reports attached. I’m not available that week to meet. I have time on Monday, June 16th or Monday, June 30th. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Right- I was suggesting we might meet at the Fraternity on the 26th after the Planning Commission meeting to discuss event management. Open to meeting in advance of the PC meeting as well. Thanks again, /juan 108 On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:44, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Yes, the noise statute is correct. I’m pretty sure the PC meeting is the 25th, not the 26th. I’m not able to attend that night but we can set up a time to meet a different time. I haven’t been inside the property, but I’ve been out front. I’ll have the reports to you shortly and I’ll provide September 2023 to current. Thanks, CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:38 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 SUPER appreciate the quick reply and advice. I was actually considering reaching out to RQN. As to “accurate", I mean are the noise statutes still accurate; it looks like the letter may have been written a while ago. I’m curious about the party registration- we can come back to that. I was only thinking this calendar year but I guess the more data, the better. Two years would be great. If you’re available to discuss event management on 26th, we can do it in person. Have you ever visited our Fraternity property? Thanks, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:28, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, 109 Happy to help. Before running reports, can you help me understand why you only need calendar year 2025? I typically provide data that includes either the academic year or at least two calendar years. SLOPD has party registration, but 720 Foothill hasn’t been eligible for it for a few years because of repeated noise violations. I’m not sure what you mean by “accurate” with regards to the RQN letter. If you are asking me if I think RQN is seeking to build relationships with fraternities, my answer is no. I strongly recommend you do not reach out to RQN at this time. We can discuss event management after your Planning Commission meeting. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 2:48 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- Terry and I are Exec board members of the Delta Upsilon Alumni organization working with Mallory to prepare for the Planning Commission meeting June 25. We’d like to request PD records information regarding our property in preparation. Can you please provide a list of any 2025 noise complaints for our property and two others as datapoints? Our property is: 720 Foothill Blvd Additional address request: 1127 Foothill 204 California FYI, Terry and I are reviewing the recommended amendments to the Fraternity Use Permit definition and as the longest continually recognized Fraternity at Cal Poly (70 years!) we’d like to be a lighthouse for open communication. I believe there have been recommendations to notify Code Enforcement prior to an event- does PD have a similar self-reporting process to notify prior to a planned event at our property? I’d also like to ask if the “Good Neighbor” letter posted by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods is accurate. We’d like to work with neighbor groups 110 like RQN to align on the use of our property with reasonable neighborly expectations. Our Active fraternity members do try to limit noise and are open to coaching and notifying prior to planned events. Thank you in advance for your collaboration... /juan Juan Fernandez 111 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:55 AM To:Terry Reeves Cc:Juan Fernandez; John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, thanks for the update! I will see you tonight. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:51 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. I'm still planning to present and we do not have any digital presentation. I'm finalizing a letter that will be submitted by noon to the Advisory email. We appreciate your assistance through this, and I'll see you tonight. On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 8:43 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry, I am checking in about tonight. I’m guessing you are still planning to present, and wondering if you have a digital presentation to accompany you? The clerk has requested you submit it by noon today. I’m sorry that this is a bit earlier than the 3pm deadline I mentioned previously. The Clerk also mentioned if you need more information about your visual aids, you can refer to page 16 of the Council Policies and Procedures Manual. 112 You can send me the presentation directly and I’ll have it available during the meeting and click through the slides. I think I mentioned it during our call, but you will have 10 minutes to speak/present after I present my staff report and answer questions, and before public comment is open. If you have any agenda correspondence you’d like to submit for the Planning Commission’s review, you have until 3pm today to submit that. You can see all agenda correspondence that has already been submitted here: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=211428&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. For information about submitting your own correspondence, please see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory-bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. I’m in the office at 919 Palm today, and can be available in person, on the phone, or by email if you have any questions.. I will be covering our public counter from 1pm to 4pm, so I may be less available during those hours, dependent on how busy we get. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 5:20 PM To: Terry Reeves < Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, 113 The Planning Commission Staff Report and associated attachments are now published and accessible online. You can download the pdfs here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=0d341b53-47b3-4741-9491- b900ccf4c5d9&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English. I will be out of the office the rest of this week, but be back working on Monday afternoon. If you have any questions you’d like answers on before next week, please reach out to Rachel Cohen at rcohen@slocity.org. Otherwise, let me know if you have any questions or concerns before Wednesday morning. If you have a presentation you’d like to present, please send it to me before 3pm on Wednesday. You may submit agenda correspondence up until 3pm on Wednesday, see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory- bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. Thank you for the chat as well. It's fine to list me as the representative. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry and Juan, 114 Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9- e00c-4566-ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan 115 On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan 116 On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006 .png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? 117 /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, 118 based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.asp x?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0H Uh_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.pn g><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. 119 Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE-0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse. aspx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView. aspx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk 120 o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx ?id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.p ng><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield 121 ( -- Terry -- Terry 122 From:Holcomb, Kelly Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:54 AM To:Dietrick, Christine Cc:Wooten, Eric; Zion, Sarah Subject:RE: Grand Jury Report Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed I reorganized the SharePoint folders (so old links will have broken) but all the same people who had access, still do: 20250623_Grand Jury Report_Town and Gown The OneNote also has links to everything and the Planner task due date is set for the Council meeting when they will discuss forming the ad hoc committee (in case something needs to be prepared for that). Kelly Holcomb Senior Legal Analyst E kholcomb@slocity.org T 805.781.7060 From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:28 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Grand Jury Report Eric can you please set up a task for review of the now public Grand Jury report and Kelly can you link the SP file we had set up previously with all the info and responses compiled to date, with a new response template for the public response? Thx. Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent 123 responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 124 From:Terry Reeves <reevest81@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:51 AM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Juan Fernandez; John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. I'm still planning to present and we do not have any digital presentation. I'm finalizing a letter that will be submitted by noon to the Advisory email. We appreciate your assistance through this, and I'll see you tonight. On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 8:43 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry, I am checking in about tonight. I’m guessing you are still planning to present, and wondering if you have a digital presentation to accompany you? The clerk has requested you submit it by noon today. I’m sorry that this is a bit earlier than the 3pm deadline I mentioned previously. The Clerk also mentioned if you need more information about your visual aids, you can refer to page 16 of the Council Policies and Procedures Manual. You can send me the presentation directly and I’ll have it available during the meeting and click through the slides. I think I mentioned it during our call, but you will have 10 minutes to speak/present after I present my staff report and answer questions, and before public comment is open. If you have any agenda correspondence you’d like to submit for the Planning Commission’s review, you have until 3pm today to submit that. You can see all agenda correspondence that has already been submitted here: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=211428&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. For information about submitting your own correspondence, please see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory-bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. I’m in the office at 919 Palm today, and can be available in person, on the phone, or by email if you have any questions.. I will be covering our public counter from 1pm to 4pm, so I may be less available during those hours, dependent on how busy we get. 125 Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 5:20 PM To: Terry Reeves < Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, The Planning Commission Staff Report and associated attachments are now published and accessible online. You can download the pdfs here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=0d341b53-47b3-4741-9491- b900ccf4c5d9&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English. I will be out of the office the rest of this week, but be back working on Monday afternoon. If you have any questions you’d like answers on before next week, please reach out to Rachel Cohen at rcohen@slocity.org. Otherwise, let me know if you have any questions or concerns before Wednesday morning. If you have a presentation you’d like to present, please send it to me before 3pm on Wednesday. You may submit agenda correspondence up until 3pm on Wednesday, see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory- bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org 126 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. Thank you for the chat as well. It's fine to list me as the representative. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry and Juan, Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9- e00c-4566-ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner 127 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, 128 Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, 129 Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006 .png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: 130 Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.asp x?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0H Uh_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, 131 Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.pn g><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, 132 My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE-0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse. aspx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView. aspx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.as px?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx ?id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. 133 I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.p ng><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( -- Terry -- Terry 134 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48 AM To:Dietrick, Christine; McDonald, Whitney; Stewart, Erica A; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Team, I reached out to Bulbul to ask for more time on this, since the morning is very full. I let her know that we’re working on a statement in response to her questions and asked her to push the deadline to noon. I’ll let you know what she says. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 135 The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. 136 Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 137 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 138 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:48 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO I already reached out to her. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:30 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Okay great. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:24 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Yes and Chief Scott has eyes on it. It’s my understanding that Whitney will be responding to Bulbul with our statement. More to come. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager 139 E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:17 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Brian said she’s reached out to several folks. Is there a response being formulated? Thanks, CW From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:15 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Christine, I hope you're well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. The report alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury, with only one sworn officer participating in an interview. 1. Is this accurate? If so, why wouldn't more officers speak with the Grand Jury? 2. Per the jury's recommendation, the City Manager must create formal guidelines and provide training on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies. Has work on this begun yet? 3. Does SLOPD agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 140 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 141 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:43 AM To:Holcomb, Kelly Cc:Dietrick, Christine Subject:RE: Grand Jury Report The Grand Jury did not send the final report to me directly and has not provided an updated cover sheet. From: Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:40 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Grand Jury Report Whitney, With the 2-day notification and draft report, the Grand Jury Foreperson had provided a kind of cover sheet for the City’s formal response: Did they supply an updated version when the final report was published, or should we just update the one they previously sent? It seems just the date will have changed but wanted to check. Kelly Holcomb Senior Legal Analyst E kholcomb@slocity.org T 805.781.7060 From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. 142 Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 143 From:Dietrick, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM To:Szentesi, Whit; McDonald, Whitney; Stewart, Erica A; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:14 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Can you please let me know when you’re done with your review/changes and I’ll clean it up? Thanks, Whit 144 Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:50 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO I have time this morning to work on the response and will return to that now. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor 145 Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul 146 ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 147 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:30 AM To:Szentesi, Whit Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Okay great. From: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:24 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Yes and Chief Scott has eyes on it. It’s my understanding that Whitney will be responding to Bulbul with our statement. More to come. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:17 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Brian said she’s reached out to several folks. Is there a response being formulated? Thanks, CW From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:15 AM 148 To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Christine, I hope you're well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. The report alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury, with only one sworn officer participating in an interview. 1. Is this accurate? If so, why wouldn't more officers speak with the Grand Jury? 2. Per the jury's recommendation, the City Manager must create formal guidelines and provide training on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies. Has work on this begun yet? 3. Does SLOPD agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 149 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:24 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Yes and Chief Scott has eyes on it. It’s my understanding that Whitney will be responding to Bulbul with our statement. More to come. Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:17 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Brian said she’s reached out to several folks. Is there a response being formulated? Thanks, CW From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:15 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Christine, I hope you're well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. The report alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury, with only one sworn officer participating in an interview. 150 1. Is this accurate? If so, why wouldn't more officers speak with the Grand Jury? 2. Per the jury's recommendation, the City Manager must create formal guidelines and provide training on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies. Has work on this begun yet? 3. Does SLOPD agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 151 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:17 AM To:Szentesi, Whit Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Brian said she’s reached out to several folks. Is there a response being formulated? Thanks, CW From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:15 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Christine, I hope you're well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. The report alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury, with only one sworn officer participating in an interview. 1. Is this accurate? If so, why wouldn't more officers speak with the Grand Jury? 2. Per the jury's recommendation, the City Manager must create formal guidelines and provide training on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies. Has work on this begun yet? 3. Does SLOPD agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 152 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 153 From:Juan Fernandez < Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:10 AM To:Wallace, Christine Cc:Terry Reeves Subject:Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Good morning Christine- I missed your question about mine and Terry’s roles: he’s the president of the Alumni corporation which owns the property at 720 Foothill and I’m the Active-Alumni advisor helping to connect our graduating members with Alumni who may be good contacts for life post-Cal Poly. We will be presenting to the SLO Planning Commission tonight and hopefully come away with a modification to our use permit. The modification adds verbiage for the actives to notify the Community Development director prior to any planned events that exceed our 23 person limit for regular meetings, study sessions, etc. I presume your availability may have changed since you sent your note- Terry and I both live out of the area so we were hoping to maybe catch a coffee with you tomorrow morning. I’ll reach out tomorrow to setup a Zoom call with you, Terry and I to gather your feedback post Planning Commission decision. Thank you, /juan On Jun 17, 2025, at 08:32, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: I’ve got pretty much all day open. How’s 10am? Can you also share with me what your role is with the fraternity? Are you an alum advisor? Best, Christine From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 9:41 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- I’m so sorry I missed the opportunity to meet today. Father’s day and work schedule blurred my view. Give the 30th is your next availability, I’d like to take that opportunity. As discussed, Delta Upsilon would like to be a lighthouse of collaboration with the City and SLOPD- can you please suggest what time you’d be available? 154 Thank you, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 16:47, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Reports attached. I’m not available that week to meet. I have time on Monday, June 16th or Monday, June 30th. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Right- I was suggesting we might meet at the Fraternity on the 26th after the Planning Commission meeting to discuss event management. Open to meeting in advance of the PC meeting as well. Thanks again, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:44, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Yes, the noise statute is correct. I’m pretty sure the PC meeting is the 25th, not the 26th. I’m not able to attend that night but we can set up a time to meet a different time. I haven’t been inside the property, but I’ve been out front. I’ll have the reports to you shortly and I’ll provide September 2023 to current. Thanks, CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:38 PM 155 To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 SUPER appreciate the quick reply and advice. I was actually considering reaching out to RQN. As to “accurate", I mean are the noise statutes still accurate; it looks like the letter may have been written a while ago. I’m curious about the party registration- we can come back to that. I was only thinking this calendar year but I guess the more data, the better. Two years would be great. If you’re available to discuss event management on 26th, we can do it in person. Have you ever visited our Fraternity property? Thanks, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:28, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, Happy to help. Before running reports, can you help me understand why you only need calendar year 2025? I typically provide data that includes either the academic year or at least two calendar years. SLOPD has party registration, but 720 Foothill hasn’t been eligible for it for a few years because of repeated noise violations. I’m not sure what you mean by “accurate” with regards to the RQN letter. If you are asking me if I think RQN is seeking to build relationships with fraternities, my answer is no. I strongly recommend you do not reach out to RQN at this time. We can discuss event management after your Planning Commission meeting. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 2:48 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs 156 <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- Terry and I are Exec board members of the Delta Upsilon Alumni organization working with Mallory to prepare for the Planning Commission meeting June 25. We’d like to request PD records information regarding our property in preparation. Can you please provide a list of any 2025 noise complaints for our property and two others as datapoints? Our property is: 720 Foothill Blvd Additional address request: 1127 Foothill 204 California FYI, Terry and I are reviewing the recommended amendments to the Fraternity Use Permit definition and as the longest continually recognized Fraternity at Cal Poly (70 years!) we’d like to be a lighthouse for open communication. I believe there have been recommendations to notify Code Enforcement prior to an event- does PD have a similar self-reporting process to notify prior to a planned event at our property? I’d also like to ask if the “Good Neighbor” letter posted by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods is accurate. We’d like to work with neighbor groups like RQN to align on the use of our property with reasonable neighborly expectations. Our Active fraternity members do try to limit noise and are open to coaching and notifying prior to planned events. Thank you in advance for your collaboration... /juan Juan Fernandez 157 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:10 AM To:Bulbul Rajagopal Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Good morning, Bulbul! I’ve answered a couple of questions below. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? The council and city staff will be discussing the report findings and our responses at a Council meeting in September. 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? I believe you should get a statement from city staff about the findings. I’m happy to respond once you have seen the city staff response. There’s quite a bit of information there. 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? My understanding is the Grand Jury spoke with the SLO Police Chief, who is the person in charge of the police department. In addition they spoke to Ms. Wallace who was in charge of the communications. I’m not sure who the Grand Jury is referring to, but I would like to have a better understanding of the Grand Jury’s assertions in this report. 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. I have been and will continue to discuss the report, its findings and recommendations with city leadership and Cal Poly to have a better understanding of the Grand Jury’s assertions in this report and the effects on our two organizations. In addition, the city provided clarifications and questions on Friday, due to an extension to research and respond received from the Grand Jury. These clarifications were not included in the report that was published and the city’s questions were not answered. I assume you will see some of this in the city’s statement. In the end, council and staff have been working with many people in the community to understand the effects of Cal Poly, housing needs, and noise. Throughout the 25–27 financial plan’s eight months of community engagement, we heard the community needs more safe, healthy housing, as well as neighborhood livability. Those are both part of our major city goals for the 25-27 years. I’m sure we will be working on much of 158 what makes a home safe and a neighborhood enjoyable to live in within the city of San Luis Obispo. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 estewart@slocity.org 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The best way to report general issues within City limits or to request City services during this time is via Ask SLO, www.slocity.org/Ask. From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05:37 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING 159 NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 160 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:54 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick; Szentesi, Whit; Dietrick, Christine Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Ah! Thank you. Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 estewart@slocity.org 805.540.1154 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The best way to report general issues within City limits or to request City services during this time is via Ask SLO, www.slocity.org/Ask. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00:26 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM 161 To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 162 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 163 From:Dietrick, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:48 AM To:Boswell, Mike; McDonald, Whitney Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Mike, we are working on a City response and will provide that to Bulbul and the Council and we can communicate to her as part of that the individual councilmembers can’t speak on behalf of the full Council as to the GJ response and that the City will schedule a council meeting prior to the response deadline to complete the council response. Thx, C. From: Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:26 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Whitney & Christine I need advice on how to handle this request since it is a legal matter and I cannot speak for the council. Mike Mike Boswell Council Member Office of the City Council E MBoswell@slocity.org C 805.748.8178 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:05 PM To: Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Michael, 164 I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is today, June 25, at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 165 From:Francis, Emily Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:46 AM To:Bulbul Rajagopal Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately, I’m in meetings and unable to prepare responses to your questions before 11. I would be happy to chat about this story later but I should tell you that I was not one of the council members who was interviewed for the report. Take care. Emily Emily Francis pronouns she/her/hers Council Member Office of the City Council 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E EFrancis@slocity.org On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 10:04 PM, Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> wrote: Hi Emily, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is today, June 25, at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly 166 San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 167 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:43 AM To:Terry Reeves Cc:Juan Fernandez; John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, I am checking in about tonight. I’m guessing you are still planning to present, and wondering if you have a digital presentation to accompany you? The clerk has requested you submit it by noon today. I’m sorry that this is a bit earlier than the 3pm deadline I mentioned previously. The Clerk also mentioned if you need more information about your visual aids, you can refer to page 16 of the Council Policies and Procedures Manual. You can send me the presentation directly and I’ll have it available during the meeting and click through the slides. I think I mentioned it during our call, but you will have 10 minutes to speak/present after I present my staff report and answer questions, and before public comment is open. If you have any agenda correspondence you’d like to submit for the Planning Commission’s review, you have until 3pm today to submit that. You can see all agenda correspondence that has already been submitted here: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=211428&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. For information about submitting your own correspondence, please see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory-bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. I’m in the office at 919 Palm today, and can be available in person, on the phone, or by email if you have any questions.. I will be covering our public counter from 1pm to 4pm, so I may be less available during those hours, dependent on how busy we get. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 5:20 PM To: Terry Reeves < Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, 168 The Planning Commission Staff Report and associated attachments are now published and accessible online. You can download the pdfs here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=0d341b53-47b3-4741-9491- b900ccf4c5d9&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English. I will be out of the office the rest of this week, but be back working on Monday afternoon. If you have any questions you’d like answers on before next week, please reach out to Rachel Cohen at rcohen@slocity.org. Otherwise, let me know if you have any questions or concerns before Wednesday morning. If you have a presentation you’d like to present, please send it to me before 3pm on Wednesday. You may submit agenda correspondence up until 3pm on Wednesday, see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory- bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. Thank you for the chat as well. It's fine to list me as the representative. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry and Juan, Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9- e00c-4566-ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. 169 One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: 170 Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, 171 I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006. png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? /juan 172 On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.asp x?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HU h_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. 173 If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. Thank you, John Hatfield 174 On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE- 0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.a spx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.a spx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx? id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those 175 options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.pn g><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( -- Terry 176 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:42 AM To:CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Subject:06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Doss - Cross Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 177 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 8:33 AM To:City_Attorney Cc:CityClerk Subject:FW: SLMC Violation 9.12.050A Appeal Attachments:Receiptfinance-06242025-10.pdf; AdministativeCitationAppealForm.pdf; Noise%20complaint% 20appeal.pdf.pdf Hello, We received a citation appeal form from Kirsten Martin. It has been entered into the log and the forms are attached. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Kirsten Martin < Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 8:08 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Stacey Jelmini < ; Frankie Gonzalez 44 < Subject: SLMC Violation 9.12.050A Appeal Hi, Please see attached for my noise complaint appeal, appeal invoice receipt, and appeal form. Best, Kirsten Get Outlook for iOS Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Form must be received by the City Clerk within 10 days of date of citation to be considered timely filed. If no appeal is filed within ten days, the administrative citation shall be deemed final. SLMC§1.24.100(A). Revised and Published: 10/1/2024 PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS STARTING ON PAGE 2 BEFORE COMPLETING Address of Citation: 1 Date of Citation: ADM or Other Cite Number: Municipal Code Section(s) Cited: Municipal Code Section(s) Appealed: 2 Appellant Name(s): Appellant Mailing Address(es): Appellant Phone(s): Appellant email address( : 3 If applicable Business Name: Business License # 4 Appellant Cited As: Mark only one _____ Individual or Business _____ Owner of property or building _____ Tenant being held financially responsible for landlord citation 5 Reason for appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary. 6 Election of Appeal Process. Choose One. Election is final. 7 Appeal Fee. (calculate using worksheet on back): $ _____________ _____ Construction Board of Appeals Appeal Fee to be collected when form is submitted. Failure to pay the appropriate fee may cause your appeal to be rejected. _____ Administrative Review Board _____ Hearing Officer Office Use Only Staff initial for collection of fee _____ Date received ____________ 8 In-person Hearing. I wish to have my appeal heard on the record, so I do not need to attend an in-person hearing. I understand I may submit evidence in support of my appeal up to ten (10) days in advance of the day of review and that I will receive written notice of when that day of review will be. Confirm decision to decline in-person hearing by initialing here: _______ 9 If different that the address listed in #2 above, all future notices from the City relating to this appeal should be mailed to the following Official Mailing Address: 10 Truth of Appeal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the facts stated in this appeal are true, and that this appeal form was executed on: ________________________________ ______________ ______________________________, California Signature of Appellant or Representative Date of Signature Place of Signature 11 Representative. If applicable, Legal counsel or agent of Appellant Name and Capacity: Address: Phone: Email address: Page 2 Administrative Citation Appeal Form Instructions Questions about this form or the appeal process should be directed to the City Attorney’s Office Email: City_Attorney@slocity.org, Phone: (805)781-7140 1. Citation Details: Describe the administrative citation received (that you are appealing) with as much detail as possible. The specific information required by the Municipal Code is listed in the form, but any identifying information you provide will assist staff to quickly complete the initial intake processing of your request to appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(a-b). 2. Appellant Details: Whether cited as an individual, business owner, property/building owner, or are being held financially responsible as a tenant for a citation issued to your landlord, all contact information you wish to provide to the City should be entered here. If there is more than one appellant, attach additional pages and provide the contact information for every appellant. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(1). 3. Citation Issued to a Business: For an appeal of a citation issued directly to a business (e.g. failure to timely renew a business license), please provide the additional information in part 3 of this form. The Business Name and License number should be on the renewal notice, administrative citation, or other notifications. 4. Interest in Citation: For an administrative citation issued to an individual, only that specific person may submit an appeal. Any appeal submitted by a roommate, family member, etc., on behalf of the individual cited, will be rejected. For appeals issued to a property or building, the owner or their agent may submit an appeal, as well as any tenant who is being held contractually, financially responsible for the property citation. Any legal representative or other agent of the appellant should provide their own contact details in part 11 of this form. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(2). 5. Reason for Appeal: Give a brief statement of why you are appealing, the relief or action sought, and why the administrative citation should be revoked, modified or otherwise set aside. The AMOUNT of the fine cannot be reduced on appeal. Attach additional pages as necessary, and include any audio, video, photographic, or other supporting evidence you wish to provide. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(3)(c). 6. Election of Appeal Process: Only one appeal process may be chosen, and once chosen, the election is final. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(c). All citations that include a violation of Title 15 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (building and related codes), even if other non-Title 15 code violations are also cited, must be appealed to the Construction Board of Appeals. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(1). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, you must make a choice between: • Administrative Review Board: If you wish to retain your right to challenge the administrative citation, or any final city action related to the citation, in court by any writ action, you must appeal to the Administrative Review Board for a more formal, comprehensive hearing to ensure preparation of an adequate administrative record. Should you wish to then challenge that board’s decision in court, you will need to file a petition for writ with the Superior Court, which may require the services of an attorney to prepare, and will require payment of the City’s costs to prepare the administrative record. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(b). • Hearing Officer: An expedited, less formal appeal process to a city hearing officer, whose final decision may be appealed directly to the superior court for de novo review pursuant to California Government Code Section 53069.4. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(B)(2)(a). For citations that do not include a violation of Title 15, failure to request a hearing before the Administrative Review Board within the time for the filing of an appeal will result in the appeal being assigned to a Hearing Officer and will constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies for purposes of any subsequently filed writ action. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24.100(C)(4). Once filled out entirely and signed, email your form to CityClerk@slocity.org Or deliver in person or by mail to: City Clerk’s Office, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Page 3 7. Appeal Fee. Every path of appeal requires payment of a fee due at the time your appeal is submitted. Once your appeal is determined to be complete, timely and valid, the fee is non-refundable as it is recovery of a percentage of the cost to bring your appeal to hearing, regardless of the outcome. Fees are adopted by City Council resolution and updated annually. Use the chart below to properly calculate your appeal fee: Construction Board of Appeals, Title 15 violations Minor: related to an Alteration/Addition of an existing Single-Family or Accessory Dwelling Unit (including duplexes), a demolition permit, or any item permitted under the “Additional Building Fees” schedule $618 Moderate: related to all other permits that are processed under the alteration/addition work class, New Single-Family permits (including duplexes), and New Accessory Dwelling Unit permits $1,106 Major: related to anything that doesn’t fall into one of the other two categories $1,953 Administrative Review Board $501 Hearing Officer review, capped at $106 but could be less depending on the amount of your fine Amount of fine(s) being appealed: (1) 25% of fine(s): amount in (1) multiplied by 0.25 (2) Cost Recovery Appeal Fee Cap: (3) $106 Your appeal fee: whichever is less of (2) & (3) $ Checks should be made out to the “City of San Luis Obispo.” Payment by credit card can be facilitated by the Finance Department 1 and should be completed prior to submission of your appeal form, with a copy of the payment receipt attached to the form. Any appeal received without payment of the proper fee may be rejected. 8. Hearing Procedure: It is your right under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 1.24, no matter which appeal process is chosen, to have an in-person hearing. However, you are under no obligation to appear. If you choose, you may elect to have your appeal reviewed on the record (all documents, pictures, etc. submitted by yourself or the City).San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.110(F). 9. Official Mailing Address: The Municipal Code requires certain notices be sent via U.S. Mail and so, while courtesy notifications may be sent via email or to other addresses, you are required to provide one official mailing address for your appeal. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 10. Signature: The step most commonly missed in the appeal process (and the most common reason for rejection of a timely appeal) is failure to sign the appeal and declare the facts stated in the appeal to be true. The form provides a signature block for this purpose but if there are multiple appellants, all must sign a declaration. Any additional declarations can be attached as additional pages. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 1.24.100(C)(5). 11. Representative of Appellant: Any legal representative or other agent assisting with the preparation of the appeal or who intends to appear at the hearing, must provide their contact information and relationship to the appellant. 1 Finance Department staff are available by phone (805)781-7124 and at the public counter, downstairs at City Hall (990 Palm Street), Monday – Thursday, 8:00am – 4:00pm Kirsten Martin 548 Couper Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93405     June 22, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to formally appeal the noise citation issued at 548 Couper Drive, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405, on June 14, 2025, at approximately 9:15 p.m. Under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code § 9.12.050 A, it is prohibited to “make, continue or cause… any noise disturbance in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a distance of fifty feet from the noisemaker” at any time. Between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., this 50-foot standard applies; after 10 p.m., any noise heard across a property line is prohibited. Occurrence: This citation was issued before the city’s 10:00 p.m. quiet hours, during a small graduation gathering held entirely indoors with family members. At the time, two guests who were my boyfriend's mom, and my mom, were briefly outside leaving the house with their children. As we know, the city tickets infront of many houses when it becomes 10pm so we were having our family members leave. As I went outside to say goodbye to these guests, the police who had been sitting in their car for some time (with their lights off just monitoring I assume) saw this as a chance to ticket, as people were leaving the residency. Additionally, the officer ’s notes on the citation indicate “0 people present,” which we interpret as no visible disturbance or interaction at the time of the visit. While I understand this address has two prior violations, those were tied to a former roommate who is now out of this house. No current residents, including myself, were responsible for the previous incidents. Key facts supporting my appeal: 1. Time of citation (9:15 p.m.) - Issued before the 10 p.m. threshold, under the daytime standard . 2. Officer ’s notes indicate “0 people present”, showing no disturbance or gathering at the moment of contact. 3. No decibel or "plainly audible" measurement was recorded—there is no objective evidence of a noise disturbance. 4. First citation for current tenants—prior violations involve a former roommate; current residents were not responsible. 5. No-Warning List enforcement meant that even a peaceful gathering couldn’t receive a warning, but this was due to prior infractions unrelated to current occupants. 6. My landlord noted there is an old couple who targets this home as it previously was a fraternity house and we assume had issues years ago with the residents of the neighborhood. The police upon arrival said our neighbors have been very unhappy with us which enforces our shared knowledge. Given the absence of any audible noise violation under the city’s own code, and that the citation was issued before quiet hours, I respectfully request that this citation be dismissed. I am happy to provide additional evidence—such as witness statements or a copy of the citation—or appear at a hearing if necessary. Thank you for your time and understanding. Sincerely, Kirsten Martin City of San Luis Obispo Finance 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7124 www.slocity.org Thank you for your payment. Have a nice day! Tuesday Jun 24 2025 12:36:19 PM Admin Citation Appeal Fee (ACAF) ADM 29357 KIRSTEN MARTIN 87.50 __________________________________________ Total 87.50 Credit 3491 87.50 Receipt #: finance-06242025-10 Cashier: Patrick Koski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VISA ************ Entry Method: MANUAL Date: 06/24/25 Time: 11:36:54 Reference: q-2yy53dG7eHnHYkUGqRPIHAsiEwY Auth Code: 113366 Approved - Thank You Merchant Id: CITYOSANL2GB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL USD $ 87.50 I AGREE TO PAY THE ABOVE AMOUNT ACCORDING TO THE CARD ISSUER AGREEMENT (MERCHANT AGREEMENT IF CREDIT VOUCHER) x_________________________________________ Cardholder Signature City Copy City of San Luis Obispo Finance 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7124 www.slocity.org Thank you for your payment. Have a nice day! Tuesday Jun 24 2025 12:36:19 PM Admin Citation Appeal Fee (ACAF) ADM 29357 KIRSTEN MARTIN 87.50 __________________________________________ Total 87.50 Credit 3491 87.50 Receipt #: finance-06242025-10 Cashier: Patrick Koski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VISA ************ Entry Method: MANUAL Date: 06/24/25 Time: 11:36:54 Reference: q-2yy53dG7eHnHYkUGqRPIHAsiEwY Auth Code: 113366 Approved - Thank You Merchant Id: CITYOSANL2GB Customer Copy 178 From:Boswell, Mike Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:26 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Dietrick, Christine Subject:Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Whitney & Christine I need advice on how to handle this request since it is a legal matter and I cannot speak for the council. Mike Mike Boswell Council Member Office of the City Council E MBoswell@slocity.org C 805.748.8178 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:05 PM To: Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Michael, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. 179 My deadline for this story is today, June 25, at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 180 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:00 AM To:Stewart, Erica A; Hermann, Greg; Scott, Rick; Szentesi, Whit; Dietrick, Christine Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, We are preparing a statement to send back to Bulbul in response to the same or similar questions that she sent to me and, it appears, to other Council Members as well. I’d recommend just referring her to the statement and information that I will send her later this morning. Happy to discuss further if you have any questions or concerns with this approach. Thanks much, Whitney Get Outlook for iOS From: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:41 PM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Media request: New Times SLO Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 181 From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 182 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 183 From:Scott, Rick Sent:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 12:14 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Dietrick, Christine Subject:Privileged and confidential: Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I know the team will have much more context to provide on the questions consistent with our initial response to the grand jury and our holding statement. Thank you, R. Scott On Jun 24, 2025, at 23:41, Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> wrote: Hi, Below are my draft responses. Let me know if I’ve missed anything. #2 needs six different answers that I’ll try to work on before 9:30. Thanks, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org 184 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer 185 New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 186 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:04 PM To:Bulbul Rajagopal Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, It’s nice to hear from you. I will do my best to answer these questions tomorrow morning. We have the groundbreaking for the welcome home village tomorrow at 10am. So timing is tight. If nothing else, please know that the council will be discussing the report findings. Based on our agenda items and upcoming available meetings, our responses may be at a Council meeting in September. Hope all is well with you, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 Eestewart@slocity.org C805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:05:37 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Erica, I hope you're doing well! I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. 187 My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 188 From:Shoresman, Michelle Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:21 PM To:Bulbul Rajagopal; McDonald, Whitney Subject:Re: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Bulbul, It is my understanding that city staff are already working with you on a response to your questions. Feel free to reach out again if needed. Thanks, Michelle From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:03:22 PM To: Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Michelle, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is today, June 25, at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com 189 SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 190 From:Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 10:05 PM To:Boswell, Mike Subject:Media request: New Times SLO Hi Michael, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations for the City Council. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to continue working with Cal Poly to create a plan to eliminate illegal parties, initiate a task force to monitor frat activity/parking/noise, and consider adopting a tiered planning appeal fee structure? 2. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 3. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is today, June 25, at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX 191 From:Brett Cross < Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:10 PM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:SUBJECT: RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (USE-0334- 2025) FOR A FRATERNITY. Dear Planning Commissioners, The question before you this evening is the same question that has been before you recently--and that question is how do you "condition" a permit for a fraternity that make it possible to make the finding that the proposed use will not adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. Fraternity uses are unlike any typical residential use. Which the following excerpts from the1967 California Court of Appeals case aptly point out. [Civ. No. 31524. Second Dist., Div. One. Nov. 8, 1967.] CITY OF LONG BEACH, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA LAMBDA CHAPTER OF SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY et al., Defendants and Appellants. [10] Appellants mistakenly proceed upon the theory that a fraternity house is identical to a boarding house or a lodging house merely because the members of the fraternity eat and sleep at the fraternity house, and that eating and sleeping are incidents of a residential use, and, therefore, by prohibiting fraternities from an R-4 zone, fraternity members are being prohibited from exercising a residential use of property. The facts of life dictate that there is a vast difference between a boarding house or lodging house and a fraternity house. It was appropriately said in Pettis v. Alpha Alpha Chapter of Phi Beta Pi, 115 Neb. 525 [213 N.W. 835, 837-838]: ".. "And ... speaking of college students generally, the court observes that it is a matter of common knowledge and well established that groups of students are for the most part exuberant, boisterous, and hilarious, and that they do not ordinarily keep regular hours and are addicted to the use and abuse of vibrant and sonorous musical instruments." "The city council apparently was fully aware that college spirit contemplates frequent gatherings with attendant boisterous [255 Cal. App. 2d 797] conduct on occasions. The "rush parties," the dances, the rallies and other manifestations of the collegiate spirit are present in a fraternity house and frequently absent in a boarding house, a lodging house or an apartment." The difficulty that the commission and staff is having is how to come up with a set of conditions given the unique qualities and characteristics of a college fraternity. Condition No. 2 requires the Planning Commission to re-evaluate the Use Permit if the fraternity receives three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition that (a) are not contested or are upheld on appeal, and (b) the conduct for which the citations were issued 192 resulted in adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding neighborhood. " I'm concerned with the language regarding allowing up to 3 noise citations possibly in a 12 month period. Since the wording groups in all citations. The Noise violations need to be kept separate. The adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding neighborhood appears to require that something more that just the violation of a law of permit condition is required. Any noise citation should be reviewed based on the nature of the noise citation- number of attendees, impact to surrounding neighbors, and the type of noise including the time of day. A review of the Use Permit should occur based on the severity. Condition No. 13 of U 36-09 should remain in force with the new conditions. "13. The use permit shall be reviewed if any reasonable written citizen or Police or Fire Department complaints are received by the City. In review of the use permit, the Planning Commission may add, delete, or modify conditions of approval or revoke the use permit." I'm not sure why this prior condition should be removed. Lastly, the elephant in the room is alcohol. Sororities have a no alcohol policy from the National Panhellenic Conference. 'The National Panhellenic Conference mandates in its “Policies and Best Practices” document that Panhellenic funds cannot be spent on “alcoholic beverages for any purpose.” Fraternities face no such regulation from the North-American Interfraternity Conference." A condition should be added that prohibits any alcohol and drug use at any " “Sanctioned event”" as defined in Assembly Bill No. 524 that is required to be registered with the university. Sincerely, Brett Cross San Luis Obispo 194 From:Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 6:12 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Re: 1236 Monte Vista Place - Delta Chi appeal Director Tway, Thank you for your suggestion of strengthening our written appeal with arguments and supporting evidence. I greatly appreciate your flexibility with the July 4th extension and will get those documents to you by next week. On the topic of hearing date I was actually planning on reaching out later this week, but I can go more in depth below. As incoming 4th year students at Cal Poly, all of our chapter’s executive board representatives, including myself, have out of town internships this summer. With the academic year beginning on September 18th, us students will be in the final 1-2 weeks working for our companies and therefore will not be in San Luis Obispo on Tuesday, September 2nd. We would like to politely request that our appeal either be heard at the following city council meeting on Tuesday, September 16th, or at one of the two meetings in October. I appreciate your understanding and adaptability with our situation. Thank you for your time, -------------------------------------------------------- Chris Green President Delta Chi Fraternity California Polytechnic State University president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com ( On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:48 PM Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Chris, We have received your appeal and are working to agendize it to be heard by the City Council. Due to impacted Council meetings there are limited options for scheduling this item and the meeting we have identified for the potential hearing is September 2, 2025. Please confirm your, or another representative’s availability for that date. In addition, there is very little information provided in your appeal as to the reasons you think the Council should consider your appeal and no evidence provided for support of this argument. Part of what we (City Staff) will do in preparing for the council meeting is to analyze any arguments you present and/or evidence provided as to why the Council should uphold your appeal. In the absence of this information, we will not have anything to present to or 195 analyze for the City Council as your argument. While the appeal was already due, I would like to extend you the option of submitting your arguments and any supporting evidence that you would like us to consider by next Friday, July 4. Thank you! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 196 From:James, Dillon Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 4:20 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Subject:Re: CP attendees and agenda items You're fast! Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 4:19 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: Re: CP attendees and agenda items Anthony R. Palazzo arpalazz@calpoly.edu; Jessica Lyn Darin darin@calpoly.edu; George Hughes grhughes@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 4:17 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Courtney, The agenda is ready to send out, but it looks like I'm missing a few CP emails, if you wouldn't mind forwarding them my way. I can also just send the agenda to you if it's easier 덞덛덟덜덝 I don't seem to have the following folks' emails:  Anthony Palazzo  Jessica Darin  George Hughes Thank you again! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his 197 Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:42 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Courtney, Yes, let me confirm a few things internally and I will get back to you ASAP. Thanks for checking in! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked ima ge cannot be displayed. T… The linked ima ge cannot be displayed. T… The linked ima ge cannot be displayed. T… The linked ima ge cannot be displayed. T… The linked ima ge cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:41 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Dillon, Hoping you can share out the agenda today with the meeting coming up on Thursday. We have some changes. Please add: David Valadez, Associate Vice President, Financial Services to the attendee list and remove Allison Baird- James. Please remove the St. Patrick’s Day item and change the Housing and Infrastructure Update item to Anthony only. 198 Thanks! Courtney From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <wmcdonal@slocity.org> Subject: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Dillon, Here’s a list of our attendees and proposed agenda items for the City/University lunch this coming Thursday. Please let me know if you need anything else on this! Cal Poly Attendees: Jen Haft, Chief of Staff Allison Baird-James, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance Anthony Palazzo, Executive Director, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects Jessica Darin, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives and Advocacy Terrance Harris, Vice President, Student Affairs and Strategic Enrollment Management George Hughes, Associate Vice President, Public Safety Courtney Kienow, Director, Community Relations and Economic Development Proposed Agenda Items: Budget update (city and university) – Allison/Whitney Housing and Infrastructure update –Allison/Anthony Maritime Integration – Jessica Fraternities/Conditional Use Permits/Grand Jury Report – Terrance/Courtney Summer/Fall Student Affairs led activities (SLO Days, Wow, start of school, etc) – Terrance Saint Patrick’s Day Planning – Allison/Chief Scott Please let me know what items the City adds in case we need to prepare for a discussion on any of them. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 199 From:James, Dillon Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:37 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting For the second meeting, here's when Whitney, Scott, Greg, and Timmi could meet next:  Monday, August 18, 9am or 10am  Wednesday, August 20, 4pm  Tuesday, August 26, 3pm or 4pm  Wednesday, September 3, 3pm We are about to enter the vacation madness season, hence the scattered availability on our end. Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:31 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting That’s it! Thanks Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:30 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting You've got it. Confirming the CP attendees are:  You  Jo Campbell  Joy Pederson  Jason Mockford  Terrance Leshae Harris 200 Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:27 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Please remove Elizabeth and add Terrance Leshae Harris tharris@calpoly.edu from the meeting invite. Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:25 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Can you confirm a good meeting location for both of these? Or were you thinking of holding on at City Hall, one on- campus? Thanks again. Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 201 From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:24 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes – let’s do that Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:20 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM 202 To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am 203 Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm 204 July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 205 From:James, Dillon Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:30 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting You've got it. Confirming the CP attendees are:  You  Jo Campbell  Joy Pederson  Jason Mockford  Terrance Leshae Harris Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:27 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Please remove Elizabeth and add Terrance Leshae Harris tharris@calpoly.edu from the meeting invite. Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:25 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Can you confirm a good meeting location for both of these? Or were you thinking of holding on at City Hall, one on- campus? Thanks again. 206 Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:24 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes – let’s do that Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:20 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The link ed image cannot be disp layed. T… The link ed image cannot be disp layed. T… The link ed image cannot be disp layed. T… The link ed image cannot be disp layed. T… The link ed image cannot be disp layed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 207 From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu 208 Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, 209 Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 210 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:28 PM To:James, Dillon Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Please remove Elizabeth and add Terrance Leshae Harris tharris@calpoly.edu from the meeting invite. Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:25 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Can you confirm a good meeting location for both of these? Or were you thinking of holding on at City Hall, one on- campus? Thanks again. Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:24 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes – let’s do that Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:20 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> 211 Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting 212 We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 213 From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development 214 Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 215 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:27 PM To:James, Dillon Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Let’s do that – first one at city hall and second on campus. Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:25 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Can you confirm a good meeting location for both of these? Or were you thinking of holding on at City Hall, one on- campus? Thanks again. Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… The link ed image can not be disp layed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:24 PM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes – let’s do that Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:20 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> 216 Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting 217 We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 218 From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development 219 Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 220 From:Matthew < Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:25 PM To:Planning Cc: Subject:Special Event Notification - Lambda Chi Alpha, 10/29/2025 Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Dear San Luis Obispo Planning Committee, My name is Matthew Gnos, and I am a representative of the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity, located at 1264 East Foothill Blvd. We are planning to host a haunted house fundraiser at our chapter house, 1264 East Foothill Blvd, on 10/29/2025 from 8 pm to 11 pm. We expect more than 48 attendees and are therefore submitting this notice per our Conditional Use Permit. We will be preparing a written notice for neighbors within 300 feet, and we are committed to complying with all relevant conditions, including the requirement for a Transportation Management Plan. To ensure we meet the city’s expectations, would you be able to provide us with a draft or template of an acceptable Transportation Management Plan for an event of this nature? We would appreciate any guidance or examples you can share. I have also CC’d Blake Brennan, our Vice President, who is leading the planning for this event. Please let us know if you require any additional documentation or clarification. We look forward to your review and approval. Best, Matthew Gnos LCA Risk Manager 221 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:24 PM To:James, Dillon; Hermann, Greg Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes – let’s do that Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 1:20 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.City of San Luis Obispo City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org To help protect you r privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect you r privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect you r privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect you r privacy, Microsoft Of… To help protect you r privacy, Microsoft Of… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney 222 From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, 223 It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola 224 We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 225 From:James, Dillon Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:19 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow; Hermann, Greg Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, This has been delayed because we have a scheduling conflict with the second meeting and I'm looking at a few options. If you'd like, I can send out an invitation for the first meeting, and you and I can separately connect to find another good date/time for the second meeting. Would that work for you? Thanks! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg 226 From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 227 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. 228 Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 229 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:11 PM To:McDonald, Whitney Cc:Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO I’d recommend responding with a short statement: Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:11 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Importance: High Hi Whit, I received this inquiry from the New Times and am hoping you might be able to help me craft a response. I don’t think we will be able to provide the specific answers she is looking for because some of the findings and recommendations are pointed to the City Council and the Planning Commission, which must provide responses as a body. We have a lot of thoughts about the grand jury report and I hope the media will give us time to prepare thoughtful responses that provide our side of the story. We just can’t do this in one day. Thanks much! Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) 230 City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 231 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 232 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:59 PM To:Hermann, Greg; James, Dillon Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi Dillon, Our team hasn’t seen these meetings on the calendar yet. Can you please send an invitation out? Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 10:28 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? 233 In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, 234 Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 235 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 12:11 PM To:Szentesi, Whit Cc:Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whit, I received this inquiry from the New Times and am hoping you might be able to help me craft a response. I Thanks much! Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:10 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, I hope you're doing well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. I have a few questions about its findings and recommendations. 1. Are you prepared to work on the Grand Jury's recommendations to identify illegal frats, adopt more uniform conditions for CUPs, and create more formal guidelines on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies? 2. The report also alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury. Have you addressed this with the Police Chief? If so, what was the response? 236 3. Do you agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? 4. Please feel free to include any other comments about the Grand Jury report. My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 237 From:Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 11:15 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:Media request: New Times SLO Hi Christine, I hope you're well. I'm working on a story about the Grand Jury report about the city's handling of frat parties in neighborhoods. The report alleged that SLOPD didn't cooperate with the Grand Jury, with only one sworn officer participating in an interview. 1. Is this accurate? If so, why wouldn't more officers speak with the Grand Jury? 2. Per the jury's recommendation, the City Manager must create formal guidelines and provide training on how SLOPD should respond to the jury and other oversight bodies. Has work on this begun yet? 3. Does SLOPD agree with the jury's six findings that the city has failed to adequately address the issue of unsanctioned and noisy frat parties? My deadline for this story is tomorrow at 11 am. I appreciate any time you can dedicate to my request. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Like New Times on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Follow New Times on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.LinkedIn SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Like the Sun on Facebook To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Follow the Sun on Twitter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Follow the Sun on Instagram To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. LinkedIn MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.MY805TIX 238 From:James, Dillon Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:43 AM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Cc:McDonald, Whitney Subject:Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Courtney, Yes, let me confirm a few things internally and I will get back to you ASAP. Thanks for checking in! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:41 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Dillon, Hoping you can share out the agenda today with the meeting coming up on Thursday. We have some changes. Please add: David Valadez, Associate Vice President, Financial Services to the attendee list and remove Allison Baird- James. Please remove the St. Patrick’s Day item and change the Housing and Infrastructure Update item to Anthony only. Thanks! Courtney From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <wmcdonal@slocity.org> Subject: CP attendees and agenda items 239 Hi Dillon, Here’s a list of our attendees and proposed agenda items for the City/University lunch this coming Thursday. Please let me know if you need anything else on this! Cal Poly Attendees: Jen Haft, Chief of Staff Allison Baird-James, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance Anthony Palazzo, Executive Director, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects Jessica Darin, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives and Advocacy Terrance Harris, Vice President, Student Affairs and Strategic Enrollment Management George Hughes, Associate Vice President, Public Safety Courtney Kienow, Director, Community Relations and Economic Development Proposed Agenda Items: Budget update (city and university) – Allison/Whitney Housing and Infrastructure update –Allison/Anthony Maritime Integration – Jessica Fraternities/Conditional Use Permits/Grand Jury Report – Terrance/Courtney Summer/Fall Student Affairs led activities (SLO Days, Wow, start of school, etc) – Terrance Saint Patrick’s Day Planning – Allison/Chief Scott Please let me know what items the City adds in case we need to prepare for a discussion on any of them. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 240 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 24, 2025 9:42 AM To:James, Dillon Cc:McDonald, Whitney Subject:Re: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Dillon, Hoping you can share out the agenda today with the meeting coming up on Thursday. We have some changes. Please add: David Valadez, Associate Vice President, Financial Services to the attendee list and remove Allison Baird- James. Please remove the St. Patrick’s Day item and change the Housing and Infrastructure Update item to Anthony only. Thanks! Courtney From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 11:15 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <wmcdonal@slocity.org> Subject: CP attendees and agenda items Hi Dillon, Here’s a list of our attendees and proposed agenda items for the City/University lunch this coming Thursday. Please let me know if you need anything else on this! Cal Poly Attendees: Jen Haft, Chief of Staff Allison Baird-James, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance Anthony Palazzo, Executive Director, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects Jessica Darin, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives and Advocacy Terrance Harris, Vice President, Student Affairs and Strategic Enrollment Management George Hughes, Associate Vice President, Public Safety Courtney Kienow, Director, Community Relations and Economic Development Proposed Agenda Items: Budget update (city and university) – Allison/Whitney Housing and Infrastructure update –Allison/Anthony Maritime Integration – Jessica Fraternities/Conditional Use Permits/Grand Jury Report – Terrance/Courtney Summer/Fall Student Affairs led activities (SLO Days, Wow, start of school, etc) – Terrance Saint Patrick’s Day Planning – Allison/Chief Scott Please let me know what items the City adds in case we need to prepare for a discussion on any of them. Warmly, 241 Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 242 From:RQN of SLO <rqn.board@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 5:45 PM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Subject:Re: Planning Commission, Item 4a Thank you, Andrea! On Monday, June 23, 2025, 3:57:14 PM GMT-8, Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <acolunga@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Sandra, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: RQN of SLO <rqn.board@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:10 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission, Item 4a Dear Chairman Houghton and Planning Commissioners, Request Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Fraternities have a choice of where to hold their events. Review of several CSU AB 524* reports show fraternity events at other CSU locations being held at the chapter house, at various on-campus locations and at third-party locations/venues. However, 243 fraternities in San Luis Obispo hold their parties/events, except maybe chapter meetings, at their main chapter house or at a satellite house. This is the problem. Delta Upsilon has chosen to continue to hold noisy events with excessive numbers of attendees at their main and satellite hou ses, despite being given multiple verbal and written warnings, noise citations and notices of violation. It appears obvious that the chapter president and members of Delta Upsilon have no respect for our city or its laws. It is time that these individuals take responsibility for their actions and for the disruption they cause to others, be more respectful to their neighbors and the city where they have chosen to live, and find a sensible way to hold their events – for example, at third-party venues. Until that happens it does not appear that they have earned the privilege of having their Conditional Use Permit continue in any form. Until they show the respect due others, we recommend their Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Sincerely, /S/ Sandra Rowley Chairperson, RQN Addendum: Excerpts from MC 9.12.050 and 9.12.060 *AB 524 , passed by the State Legislature, requires fraternities (and sororities) to disclose various types of information - number of members, average grade point, funds raised for charity - and most important to us, the addresses where various events occurred during the past academic year. This last report is being manipulated by Cal Poly by using the generic term “San Luis Obispo” in lieu of the street address. In essence the Cal Poly Administration is doing everything it can to thwart the city’s ability to identify dwellings of new fraternities and of additional satellite houses and enforce our municipal codes. Addendum 244 In addition to the above comments, I wish to note the following: The hearing officer who heard the appeal of the citation issued to Delta Upsilon on February 7, 2025, was incorrect in basing his ruling on the standard of “50 feet from the property line” when the standard is actually “50 feet from the noisemaker” if it is between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. If, however, the noise is heard between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., the standard is only “crossing a residential or commercial property line.” Depending on the time of day, the location of the source of the noise and the location of the issuing officer, the conclusion of the hearing officer may not have been an accurate interpretation of the facts. 245 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:58 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Subject:06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker, S. - RQN of SLO Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 246 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:57 PM To:Steven Walker Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Planning Commission 6/25/2025 Item 4a Hi Steve, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Walker < Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:41 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission 6/25/2025 Item 4a SLO City Planning Commissioners, I am working on Wednesday, June 25th, until 8 p.m., so I can't attend the hearing, but I have some input to provide. I want to commend the Planning Commission for doing the right thing and holding fraternities responsible for the conditions of their Conditional Use Permits. Today, the San Luis Obispo County Grand Jury released its report that found, among other things: -The city has failed to effectively handle problems associated with fraternities. -The city has failed to engage with community stakeholders to find solutions for the negative impacts of fraternities. -The city has failed to effectively enforce municipal codes that prohibit fraternities in R1/R2 neighborhoods. -The city has failed to consistently enforce the conditions of fraternities' Conditional Use Permits. I credit the Planning Commission for recognizing the problem, enforcing the conditions of the fraternities' CUPs, and revoking use permits when conditions are repeatedly violated. The health, safety, and welfare of the community surrounding a fraternity depend on the fraternity abiding by the conditions. Condition 14 of Delta Upsilon's current CUP says it may be revoked if the fraternity violates the conditions or the law, etc. 247 "Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grounds for revocation of this permit." Violating the noise ordinance is considered a "public nuisance" and applies to Condition 14. Please adopt Resolution B and revoke Delta Upsilon's use permit because the fraternity has violated the conditions of its use permit over and over, even after the city sent them notices. Delta Upsilon has proven that its current use is not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. Thank you, Steve Walker The Grand Jury's Findings are below. The report is attached. Finding 1: Prior to 2025, the city failed to effectively provide a multi-pronged, cohesive approach to manage or shut down large unsanctioned, costly and unruly events such as St. Fratty’s Day. This created an unsafe environment, with increasing size of unruly crowds, property damage, injuries and public disturbances. Finding 2: The city has not effectively engaged in working together with community stakeholders to find solutions for ongoing off-campus issues that negatively impact neighborhoods such as code enforcement, noise issues, trespassing, property damage, and unruly events. Finding 3: The city has failed to effectively enforce municipal codes that prohibit fraternity and sorority activity in R-1/R-2 zones in part due to the difficulty in identifying houses that are hosting fraternity-type events, such as rush events and repeated parties. This inaction has resulted in an increase of illegal fraternities holding events in residential neighborhoods making these areas almost unlivable for most residents. Finding 4: The city has failed to consistently enforce CUPs such as the requirements for an annual list of parties and events, notification to neighbors, and parking plans. Strict enforcement of these conditions would contribute to a reduction of the disturbances in the neighborhoods. Finding 5: The current planning appeal fee structure in SLO disproportionately impacts ordinary citizens, as the high costs create barriers for those raising concerns about community issues such as noise or safety. While these fees may be justifiable for large-scale development appeals requiring additional city resources, they hinder equitable participation in local decision-making processes. Finding 6: The Grand Jury encountered a lack of cooperation from the San Luis Obispo City Police Department. While one sworn officer did participate in an interview, efforts to interview two additional sworn officers were unsuccessful. This unwillingness to engage hindered the Grand Jury’s ability to corroborate statements, obtain essential information, and maintain transparency in its oversight role. 248 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:57 PM To:RQN of SLO Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Planning Commission, Item 4a Hi Sandra, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: RQN of SLO <rqn.board@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:10 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission, Item 4a Dear Chairman Houghton and Planning Commissioners, Request Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Fraternities have a choice of where to hold their events. Review of several CSU AB 524* reports show fraternity events at other CSU locations being held at the chapter house, at various on-campus locations and at third-party locations/venues. However, fraternities in San Luis Obispo hold their parties/events, except maybe chapter meetings, at their main chapter house or at a satellite house. This is the problem. Delta Upsilon has chosen to continue to hold noisy events with excessive numbers of attendees at their main and satellite houses, despite being given multiple verbal and written warnings, noise citations and notices of violation. It appears obvious that the chapter president and members of Delta Upsilon have no respect for our city or its laws. It is time that these individuals take responsibility for their actions and for the disruption they cause to others, be more respectful to their neighbors and the city where they have chosen to live, and find a sensible way to hold their events – for example, at third-party venues. Until that happens it does not appear that they have earned the privilege of having their Conditional Use Permit continue in any form. 249 Until they show the respect due others, we recommend their Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Sincerely, /S/ Sandra Rowley Chairperson, RQN Addendum: Excerpts from MC 9.12.050 and 9.12.060 *AB 524 , passed by the State Legislature, requires fraternities (and sororities) to disclose various types of information - number of members, average grade point, funds raised for charity - and most important to us, the addresses where various events occurred during the past academic year. This last report is being manipulated by Cal Poly by using the generic term “San Luis Obispo” in lieu of the street address. In essence the Cal Poly Administration is doing everything it can to thwart the city’s ability to identify dwellings of new fraternities and of additional satellite houses and enforce our municipal codes. Addendum 250 In addition to the above comments, I wish to note the following: The hearing officer who heard the appeal of the citation issued to Delta Upsilon on February 7, 2025, was incorrect in basing his ruling on the standard of “50 feet from the property line” when the standard is actually “50 feet from the noisemaker” if it is between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. If, however, the noise is heard between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., the standard is only “crossing a residential or commercial property line.” Depending on the time of day, the location of the source of the noise and the location of the issuing officer, the conclusion of the hearing officer may not have been an accurate interpretation of the facts. 251 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:46 PM To:Parzanese, Joe Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch For sure, thanks for troubleshooting it. It sure helps to have correct data. 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 THANKS! From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:40 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Looks like the same issue. I will get it fixed before the next time the weekly crime report comes out. Thanks for letting me know! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:37 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I just started reviewing the Weekly Crime report and noticed that the 1042 Walnut is on here twice with the GRID listing separating out. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch 252 I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch 253 Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant 254 City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 255 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:40 PM To:Parzanese, Joe Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Thanks!!!! From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:39 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Revised report, with better address groupings. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:20 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Ah okay. Thank you! From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW 256 From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick 257 From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 258 From:Parzanese, Joe Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:40 PM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Looks like the same issue. I will get it fixed before the next time the weekly crime report comes out. Thanks for letting me know! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:37 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I just started reviewing the Weekly Crime report and noticed that the 1042 Walnut is on here twice with the GRID listing separating out. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 259 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine 260 From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 261 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 262 From:Parzanese, Joe Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:39 PM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Attachments:NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts_20240901_to_20250622.xlsx Revised report, with better address groupings. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:20 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Ah okay. Thank you! From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch 263 Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch 264 Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Total Calls Total Cites Total DACS Total CIT and DAC combined 9 6 0 6 15 3 2 5 11 5 0 5 10 4 1 5 8 5 0 5 7 5 0 5 6 4 1 5 12 3 1 4 5 3 1 4 7 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 5 3 0 3 5 3 0 3 5 2 1 3 5 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 6 2 0 2 6 2 0 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 0 2 5 2 0 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2658 GRAVES; GRID L-07 482 LUNETA 814 MEINECKE 1238 FOOTHILL 146 STENNER 496 KENTUCKY 3350 ROCKVIEW 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI FRATERNITY; GRID K-06 66 RAFAEL 1229 FREDERICKS 1252 FOOTHILL # 1 1621 MCCOLLUM 385 CHAPLIN 561 ELLEN 1292 FOOTHILL 250 GRAND 1271 STAFFORD 1646 FREDERICKS 231 KENTUCKY 241 HATHWAY 334 FOOTHILL 528 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-07 1236 MONTE VISTA 138 ORANGE 1844 McCOLLUM 284 FOOTHILL 175 HATHWAY 216 ALBERT 571 CUESTA 1555 SLACK 226 PATRICIA 720 FOOTHILL 1688 MILL; GRID L-07 1304 FOOTHILL 1264 FOOTHILL 1541 SLACK NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 Address 1327 FOOTHILL 348 HATHWAY 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 589 CUESTA 641 PISMO # 1 350 SAN MIGUEL 363 HENDERSON 377 ALBERT 521 LUNETA 545 COUPER 167 FOOTHILL 183 DEL NORTE 2077 HOPE 251 HIGH # 5 331 KENTUCKY # A; GRID K-06 440 KENTUCKY 1172 MURRAY 1230 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1230 MONTE VISTA # 200; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 130 FOOTHILL 529 DARTMOUTH 53 PALOMAR # 202 148 ORANGE 1681 PHILLIPS 2022 FIXLINI 1880 GARFIELD # D 1908 LOOMIS 2069 MCCOLLUM 220 KENTUCKY 322 HATHWAY 1218 BOND 1237 MONTE VISTA # 6; GRID K-06 14 HATHWAY 1820 HOPE 1841 SLACK 145 SOUTH # A28 274 HATHWAY 281 ALBERT 346 GRAND 548 COUPER 1793 TONINI 281 HATHWAY 12 HATHWAY 1335 FOOTHILL 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 7 0 1 1 7 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 151 STENNER 195 HATHWAY 2 TASSAJARA S 1128 PEACH 1247 MADONNA;AREA OF 1248 STAFFORD 1276 BOND 1435 PHILLIPS # C; GRID K-07 388 CHAPLIN 416 BUENA VISTA 483 KENTUCKY 50 DEL MAR 550 HIGUERA # 2B; GRID J-10 1525 SLACK 167 CERRO 1924 HAYS 313 PATRICIA 359 TOLOSA 1105 LEFF 1116 PEACH 1254 BOND 1350 STAFFORD 1453 SLACK 2034 SWAZEY 2040 SWAZEY 321 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 561 LUNETA 895 LINCOLN 227 HIGHLAND 132 CALIFORNIA 1990 HAYS 1267 FREDERICKS 1739 WILSON 2315 JOHNSON 124 STENNER 136 CERRO 299 ALBERT 2090 HAYS 1185 FOOTHILL # 32 169 CARPENTER; AREA OF; GRID K-06 1254 STAFFORD 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 3 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 3340 JOHNSON 336 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 345 CHAPLIN 360 CHORRO 236 ALBERT 276 RAMONA 278 CERRO ROMAULDO 285 HERMOSA 288 CHORRO 2042 HAYS 2049 SIERRA 2061 HOPE 2099 McCOLLUM 2322 JOHNSON 1690 PHILLIPS 1706 FREDERICKS 1731 SANTA ROSA # A; GRID L-10 1885 GARFIELD 1965 HUASNA 146 STENNER # 1; GRID K-07 1515 OCEANAIRE 1659 CORONA 1677 McCOLLUM 1684 MILL 532 CUESTA 844 UPHAM 940 SANTA ROSA 1039 FOREST; GRID H-14 1311 FREDERICKS 190 STENNER 2074 LOOMIS 2134 SANTA YNEZ 344 HENDERSON 347 HENDERSON 1125 OCEANAIRE 1181 MURRAY; AREA OF GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD 177 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 189 CARPENTER 529 COUPER 1103 TIBURON; GRID N-15 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 267 HERMOSA 28 CHORRO 281 HATHWAY # 1/2; GRID K-06 286 TASSAJARA N 3057 HIGUERA S # 237 2119 HUTTON 22 CHORRO # 311 227 SANTA LUCIA 253 ALBERT 263 HIGH 1959 McCOLLUM 1990 HOPE 205 ALBERT 2063 HOPE; GRID L-06 2075 HOPE 166 HENDERSON 1800 BLK HOPE; GRID L-06 183 STENNER # 7 1840 HOPE 1877 LIMA 1351 ROYAL # 7; GRID G-14 142 TASSAJARA N 1429 SLACK 146 STENNER # 3; GRID K-07 1464 FOOTHILL 10 MARIPOSA & LAS PRADERAS 104 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1131 OLIVE # 201; GRID K-07 1135 WALNUT 1273 STAFFORD 655 JOHNSON 679 SANTA ROSA 725 GRAND 830 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 836 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 415 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 425 LUNETA 465 PACIFIC # A; GRID J-10 563 STANFORD 649 STANFORD 383 BUENA VISTA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1119 FOOTHILL 1139 WALNUT # B; GRID K-08 114 BRESSI 1144 WALNUT # 10; GRID K-08 1156 PEACH 1167 ATASCADERO 111 ORANGE 1127 FOOTHILL # 107 1131 WALNUT 1133 PALM 1134 MONTALBAN # 1; GRID J-07 1043 SOUTHWOOD # I; GRID M-12 1050 FOOTHILL # 6C; GRID J-05 107 HIGHLAND 108 CRANDALL 1085 CORTEZ 860 MURRAY 1012 SAN ADRIANO 1026 GEORGE 1031 SOUTHWOOD # E; GRID M-12 1035 OAK 674 LEFF 696 CHURCH; GRID K-11; GRID K-11 700 GRAND 71 PALOMAR 84 MUSTANG 553 COUPER 600 MARSH 615 GRAND 647 CUESTA 671 PARK 476 SANDERCOCK 49 PALOMAR # 203; GRID I-06 536 COUPER 541 LUNETA 544 PRINCETON 331 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-06 347 LA CANADA 385 CERRO ROMAULDO 410 HENDERSON 416 HATHWAY 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1464 GULF 1472 GARCIA 1435 SOUTHWOOD 1439 PHILLIPS 1445 PREFUMO CANYON # 12; GRID F-13 1454 QUARRY; GRID N-14 146 STENNER # 5; GRID K-07 1367 MILL 1383 AVALON 1391 SAN MARCOS 1394 SOUTHWOOD 1405 SLACK 133 ORANGE 1330 SOUTHWOOD # 17; ACCESS NEXT TO 1352, GRID N-13 1345 STAFFORD 1348 PEACH 1367 HIGUERA 131 HATHWAY 1314 FOOTHILL # D; GRID K-06 1317 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 1320 FOOTHILL # C2; GRID K-05 1324 CAVALIER 1262 MURRAY # 5; GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD # A; GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD # B; GRID K-07 1280 FREDERICKS 1281 BRIARWOOD 1230 MURRAY # 7; GRID K-07 1234 STAFFORD 1239 FOOTHILL # 107; GRID K-06 1252 FOOTHILL # 9; GRID K-06; AREA OF; GRID K-06 1262 MURRAY # 18 1213 CORAL 1214 MARINERS 1217 MILL 1227 CORAL 1227 STAFFORD 1191 ATASCADERO 120 DEL SUR 1206 GALLEON # B; GRID G-13 121 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 228 CHORRO N # 20; GRID J-06 228 CUESTA 233 CATALINA 215 ALBERT 2155 SANTA YNEZ 223 ROSITA 225 LA CANADA; AREA OF 225 RAMONA 189 DEL NORTE 1944 McCOLLUM 2045 SLACK 2050 HOPE 2052 JOHNSON 177 CERRO ROMAULDO 1853 PINECOVE 1857 HOMESTEAD; GRID H-14 1861 HOPE 1877 OCEANAIRE 1720 FREDERICKS 1720 LA LUNA 1731 SANTA ROSA # B; GRID L-10 1750 PREFUMO CANYON # 67 176 KENTUCKY 1702 DEVAUL 1703 SANTA BARBARA; ESTABLISHMENT APTS; GRID K-10 1710 HUASNA 172 HIGHLAND 1720 DIABLO 1658 MILL # 2; GRID L-07 168 BUENA VISTA 169 FERRINI 1690 WILSON; GRID L-07 1698 WILSON 1558 CUCARACHA 1591 MILL 1634 MILL # 8 1636 OCEANAIRE 1658 MILL # 1; GRID L-07 1510 BROAD 1512 HIGUERA; GRID L-08 1538 BALBOA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3550 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-14 3591 SACRAMENTO # 6; GRID M-15 361 LA CANADA 362 HATHWAY 3180 CALLE JAZMIN 34 RAFAEL; GRID I-06 342 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 347 JEFFREY 355 CHORRO N # B 311 DEL MAR 312 LUNETA 313 FOOTHILL 316 LEROY 316 RAMONA 3003 ROCKVIEW # 5; GRID L-13 3003 ROCKVIEW # 6; GRID L-13 302 BUENA VISTA 304 LONGVIEW 305 SANTA LUCIA 2869 JOHNSON; GRID M-12 289 RAMONA 293 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 296 RAMONA 300 LONGVIEW 263 CHORRO N # 14; GRID I-06; GRID I-06 265 ALBERT 269 CERRO ROMAULDO 276 GRAVES 278 ALBERT 248 HATHWAY 2527 BROAD 258 CALIFORNIA # C3; GRID K-06 258 CHORRO 258 WARREN 237 CATALINA 2387 BOULEVARD DEL CAMPO 2457 SENDERO 248 CHAPLIN 248 GRAND; GRID L-06 234 TASSAJARA N 235 FOOTHILL 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 ELM 70 MUSTANG; GRID J-06 700 GRAND & MILL 710 CALIFORNIA 730 BOYSEN # 4 66 RAFAEL # 1/2; GRID I-06 67 PALOMAR # 215; GRID I-07 677 CAUDILL # 1/2; GRID L-12 677 MORRO # 3; GRID J-08 678 TORO 607 GRAND # 11; GRID L-07 626 BROAD # 11; GRID J-08 631 JOHNSON # A; GRID K-07 641 SERRANO 645 FUNSTON 570 PEACH # 35; GRID J-09 572 FOOTHILL # 4; BEHIND;GRID I-06 577 PRINCETON 590 FELTON 607 GRAND # 10 526 KENTUCKY # 2; GRID K-07 551 HIGHLAND 555 RAMONA # 14; GRID I-06 561 COUPER 562 SOUTH 458 KENTUCKY 464 BROAD 49 PALOMAR # 104; GRID I-06 492 FELTON 521 HATHWAY 399 JEFFREY 415 CHORRO N # 10 440 PACIFIC # D; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 446 HATHWAY 451 CHORRO N 366 SAN MIGUEL 379 ALBERT; GRID L-06 380 CHRISTINA 385 ALBERT 3860 HIGUERA S # 240; GRID I-16 364 HATHWAY 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0152 CUESTA 845 MADONNA; GRID H-14 1114 ORCUTT 1150 CORAL & NEWPORT 1315 FOOTHILL 145 SOUTH # A54 1205 FOOTHILL & CARPENTER 1229 PEACH # E; GRID K-08 1334 PALM # 8; GRID K-08 2240 EMILY # 202 3419 ROBERTO # C; SLO CIDER CO; AREA OF; GRID M-14 1229 PEACH 136 STENNER 1750 BISHOP # 107; GRID M-10 468 LEFF # B 1100 GARDEN & HIGUERA 801 GRAND 1234 BROAD 2038 CHORRO # 3 3722 BROAD # 108; GRID M-15 93 FOOTHILL 132 STENNER 673 HIGUERA 3000 AUGUSTA 3055 DUNCAN # D; SHINDIG CIDER 830 BOYSEN # 16; GRID J-06 841 BOYSEN # 35; GRID J-06 892 GROVE 9 VERDE 905 MADONNA # 65; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 785 SERRANO 8 ELM 805 BOYSEN # 19 810 GROVE 813 MEINECKE 732 FOOTHILL 74 BROAD 741 PASATIEMPO 758 GROVE 781 MARSH # 240; GRID K-09 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1724 FARRIER 185 BROAD 1615 PHILLIPS 1671 MILL & PARK 1690 HILLCREST & PARK 1705 FARRIER 1721 NIPOMO & CHURCH 1556 GULF 1578 MADONNA # 81; ABOVE; GRID F-14 1578 MADONNA # 85 1587 ETO 1593 SOUTHWOOD & FLORA 1155 MURRAY 1198 OCEANAIRE 1321 JOHNSON 1329 ALDER 1512 MORRO 1050 ORCUTT 108 CRANDALL & FOOTHILL 1125 GARDEN 1128 OLIVE 1140 MONTALBAN HATHWAY ALLEY; AREA OF; GRID K-06 ' YTP; GRID K-10 1 MUSTANG 1000 LEFF & OSOS 1011 RAILROAD 550 HIGUERA 607 GRAND 611 MOUNTAIN VIEW 654 GRAVES; AREA OF; GRID L-07 777 MILL # 3; GRID J-09 1700 OSOS 234 FERRINI 241 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 2505 AUGUSTA 2741 MCMILLAN 1530 CALLE JOAQUIN 1625 CALLE JOAQUIN 1650 CRESTVIEW 1693 WILSON & PARK 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 675 CLARION; GRID 674 B 2 699 CHORRO & PEACH 744 FOOTHILL 54 BROAD 544 PACIFIC # 104 555 RAMONA 636 CUESTA 67 CHORRO 399 JAYCEE 411 HENDERSON 446 HIGHLAND & CUESTA 50 CHORRO 532 DANA 3650 HIGUERA S 3684 BROAD # 211 370 ISLAY 375 HILL & MOUNTAIN VIEW 3960 HIGUERA S # 197; GRID I-16 3388 BROAD & ROCKVIEW 345 BUENA VISTA 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 209 3550 RANCH HOUSE; GRID N-14 359 GRAVES; GRID L-06 284 LA CANADA 315 CERRO ROMAULDO 3180 BROAD & ORCUTT 323 CERRO ROMAULDO 333 ELKS # 18 2295 JOHNSON 260 CRAIG 265 CHORRO N 2755 AUGUSTA; IFO SINSHEIMER SCHOOL; GRID M-12 279 HERMOSA 2034 SANTA BARBARA 216 CHORRO 2160 BROAD & SOUTH 2240 FLORA 2280 EMILY # 302 187 TANGO; AREA OF; GRID I-18 1901 BROAD 2028 KING 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1092 ORCUTT # 8; BELOW; GRID M-13 1095 ORCUTT 11 LA ENTRADA & DEL NORTE 1100 ATASCADERO 1062 ISLAY # B; GRID K-10 107 FOOTHILL 1070 PALM & SANTA ROSA 1080 MORRO & HIGUERA 109 CERRO ROMAULDO 1041 SOUTHWOOD # D 1042 PALM 1050 FOOTHILL # 13F 1050 FOOTHILL # 1R; GRID J-06 106 SANTA ROSA 1029 SOUTHWOOD # O; GRID M-12 1034 YARROW 1035 SAN ADRIANO 1035 SOUTHWOOD # F; GRID M-12 1040 FOOTHILL; 284 STENNER GLEN 1020 LEFF & SANTA ROSA 1026 MILL 1028 CHURCH 1029 SOUTHWOOD 1029 SOUTHWOOD # M; GRID M-12 101 GRAVES 101 GRAVES & SLACK 1010 NIPOMO & DANA 1012 CORTEZ & PREFUMO CANYON 1012 SAN ADRIANO & PREFUMO CANYON 100 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 100 VENTURE & VACHELL 1000 BLK TIBURON; GRID N-15 1000 JOHNSON & MONTEREY 1001 WILLOW & BULLOCK BROAD & MONTEREY; GRID J-09 BULLOCK & TIBURON; GRID N-15 LA ENTRADA & RAMONA; GRID H-06 10 BROAD & FOOTHILL 10 DEL MAR & RAMONA 85 STENNER # C 875 HUMBERT 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1226 STAFFORD 123 CASA 1232 CORAL 1234 ELLA & BINNS 1239 BOND # D 1212 FREDERICKS 1212 GARDEN 1215 FOOTHILL; AREA OF;GRID K-06 1220 FREDERICKS 1220 SPONZA # 6; GRID N-14 1200 SYDNEY & HELENA 1206 MURRAY 1208 CORAL 1209 FREDERICKS & HATHWAY 1212 DRAKE 1185 PACIFIC 1192 LEFF 1199 FOOTHILL & CALIFORNIA 1200 OCEANAIRE 1200 OCEANAIRE # B 1144 WALNUT & TORO 1148 FERNWOOD # 2; GRID M-13 1160 LAUREL 1183 MURRAY 1185 FOOTHILL # 6 1128 IRIS 1131 OLIVE # 302 11321 LOS OSOS VALLEY # K 1134 MONTALBAN; AREA OF;GRID J-07 1144 ORCUTT # A 11245 LOS OSOS VALLEY 1126 WISTERIA 1127 BROAD 1127 FOOTHILL # 109; AREA;GRID J-06 1127 FOOTHILL # 204 1101 MADONNA & LOS OSOS VALLEY 111 MUSTANG BLDG; AREA OF; GRID J-05 1111 HIGUERA; AREA OF; DOZUKI; GRID K-09 1114 ORCUTT # D; GRID M-13 1114 ORCUTT # E; GRID M-13 1100 BLK OSOS; GRID K-09 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 01364 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1352 SOUTHWOOD 1358 MADONNA 1360 LAUREL # 9; GRID N-12 1360 SONRISA 1363 PISMO 1340 FREDERICKS 1340 SAWLEAF 1341 PHILLIPS 135 CRANDALL 1350 FOOTHILL; AREA OF; GRID K-05 1334 GALLEON 1334 PALM # 5; POSS 1335 ELLA 1335 ELLA # 9; GRID L-10 1337 PHILLIPS # A; GRID K-08 132 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1323 BALBOA 1328 MADONNA; AREA LAGUNA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER; 1330 GARCIA & VICENTE 1330 SOUTHWOOD 1300 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID K-06; GRID K-05 1301 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 131 GRAVES 1311 FOOTHILL 1313 MILL & PEPPER 1290 FOOTHILL 1292 SAN MATEO 1293 FREDERICKS & KENTUCKY 1293 SYDNEY & AUGUSTA 1296 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 1260 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1264 MILL & JOHNSON 1266 MONTEREY & JOHNSON 1274 STAFFORD 1276 BOND & KENTUCKY 1239 FOOTHILL 1241 BEACH & PACIFIC 1250 STAFFORD 1255 ORCUTT # A11 1260 CHORRO & PACIFIC 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1552 EL TIGRE 1552 EL TIGRE # 7 1535 NEWPORT 1542 NEWPORT 1545 LAUREL; GRID N-12 1545 OCEANAIRE 1547 BEACH & ISLAY 1515 PALM 1519 ROYAL 1520 MORRO 1526 MILL 1526 OSOS 149 CARPENTER 1496 ORCUTT & JOHNSON 1500 BLK EL TIGRE; GRID G-14 151 FOOTHILL 1515 ETO 146 STENNER # 2; GRID K-07 1468 FOOTHILL 147 RAMONA 1472 FOOTHILL 1475 SLACK 1441 SLACK 1448 LIZZIE & FIXLINI 145 SOUTH # A29; GRID J-12 145 SOUTH # A62 ;POSS ADDRESS 1458 PREFUMO CANYON 1422 SOUTHWOOD # A 1425 GARDEN 1427 MORRO 143 CERRO 1437 BEACH & BUCHON ; ON BEACH 140 FERRINI # 16 1400 BLK SLACK; GRID K-06 1400 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1400 OSOS 1400 SLACK & LONGVIEW 1366 SOUTHWOOD 137 TWIN RIDGE 1375 BALBOA 1375 PACIFIC 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1750 BISHOP; #104; GRID M-10 1759 SAN LUIS 1760 FREDERICKS 1730 BISHOP 1731 SANTA ROSA 1739 WILSON & GRAND 174 CERRO ROMAULDO & PATRICIA 175 CRANDALL 1700 BLK PORTOLA; GRID E-13 1704 OCEANAIRE 171 ORANGE 1716 SINGLE TREE 1720 TONINI # 104 1663 PHILLIPS 1690 HILLCREST 1690 PHILLIPS & PARK 170 BROOK; ETO PARK; GRID I-12 1700 BLK DEVAUL; GRID F-15 1616 FREDERICKS 1620 BISHOP; AREA OF; GRID M-10 163 LONGVIEW 165 GRAND & HAYS 1661 MCCOLLUM 160 HIGHLAND 1605 CALLE JOAQUIN 161 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 1614 SYDNEY; GRID M-11 1615 MORRO 159 STENNER # 4 1591 MILL & GROVE 1592 MADONNA 1592 PALM & GROVE 16 MUSTANG 1575 LIZZIE & WILDING 1575 MONTEREY; #14; LOS PADRES INN; GRID L-08 1581 EL TIGRE 1585 CALLE JOAQUIN 159 ORANGE 1560 PHILLIPS & GROVE 1561 HILLCREST & GROVE 1572 MADONNA # 59 ;APT ABOVE 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2033 SWAZEY 2038 CHORRO # 2; GRID K-11 205 ALBERT & LONGVIEW 205 CRAIG 1991 HAYS 20 HATHWAY 200 SANTA ROSA N # 305;BELOW; GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N # 604; GRI; MUSTANG VILLAGE II, GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N; #107; MUSTANG VILLAGE II; GRID J-06 1968 CHORRO 1968 CHORRO # A 1977 SANTA BARBARA 199 BUENA VISTA & SAN MIGUEL 199 DEL NORTE 1900 FIXLINI 1908 CHORRO; AREA OF GRID K-11 195 TANGO; GRID I-19; GRID I-18 1962 HOPE 1965 HOPE 1890 HOPE & GRAVES 1890 McCOLLUM & GRAVES 190 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 190 SANTA ROSA 1900 BLK CHORRO; GRID K-11 1866 LOOMIS 1880 GARFIELD 1880 GARFIELD # A; GRID L-07 1880 GARFIELD & GRAND 1890 HAYS & GRAVES 1843 HAYS; GRID L-06 1845 MONTEREY 1850 CHORRO & UPHAM; BLK OF 186 RAMONA 1861 WILDING 1784 FARRIER 1789 SANTA BARBARA & CHURCH 1792 CONEJO & ANDREWS 1797 TANGLEWOOD 1810 HOPE & GRAND 1775 OCEANAIRE 1778 TONINI 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2478 VICTORIA; BEHIND NEAR RR TRACKS; GRID L-12 2505 JOHNSON 252 SANDERCOCK 259 WARREN 261 CUESTA 2410 HELENA 244 CALIFORNIA 245 FOOTHILL 2459 AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 246 CHORRO 2324 MADRID 2333 MEADOW 236 SANTA LUCIA 237 FOOTHILL 2400 BLK AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 2260 LOOMIS & SANTA YNEZ 228 BROAD 228 LOS CERROS 2309 JOHNSON 2318 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 220 CALIFORNIA 220 CALIFORNIA # C; GRID K-06 2220 EXPOSITION & SOUTH 225 CHORRO; GRID J-07 2260 LOOMIS 2138 KING 2140 LOOMIS 2149 SANTA YNEZ 22 101 SOUTHBOUND & BUENA VISTA 22 CHORRO 2106 SANTA YNEZ & BUENA VISTA 2110 BROAD 2121 BROAD 2125 SIERRA 2125 STORY 2060 PARKER 21 ZACA # 120; INLINE WAREHOUSE, GRID I-15 210 MADONNA 210 MARGARITA # 14 210 SANTA LUCIA & CERRO ROMAULDO 2053 HAYS 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0323 MADONNA; GRID H-13 319 RAMONA 3195 ESTELITA 320 GRAND 321 CUESTA 3226 VIA ENSENADA 3150 ROCKVIEW 3151 CALLE MALVA & CALLE LUPITA 3165 BROAD # 102; COOL CAT CAFE; GRID L-13 3172 JOHNSON; ACTIVE CHURCH, GRID N-12; GRID N-12 319 HIGHLAND 311 GRAND 311 LONGVIEW # C; GRID K-06 3110 DUNCAN; AREA OF;GRID M-13 3125 ESTELITA # C; GRID J-14 313 SAN MIGUEL 307 FOOTHILL 3075 HIGUERA S # 300 31 RAFAEL & RAMONA 310 GRAVES 310 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-05 300 BLK TASSAJARA N; GRID I-05 301 HATHWAY 301 SANTA MARIA 304 LA CANADA 3051 AUGUSTA 2994 HIGUERA S # 13 300 BLK CHORRO; GRID J-08 300 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 300 BLK GRAND; GRID L-06 300 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-06; GRID H-05 286 CHAPLIN 2880 BROAD 289 FOOTHILL 2932 AUGUSTA 2935 JOHNSON 263 BRIDGE; GRID J-12 2741 MCMILLAN # B; ABRAHAM STEEL 276 HERMOSA 279 BRANCH 284 HERMOSA 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3900 BROAD ST; BEHIND VONS; GRID M-16 391 MONTROSE; BLK OF 376 GRAVES 3770 ORCUTT & TIBURON 383 MARGARITA 3860 HIGUERA S # CS6; GRID I-16; GRID I-16 389 JEFFREY 367 CERRO ROMAULDO 3684 BROAD; ACROSS FROM; GRID M-15 369 BRANCH 370 KENTUCKY 3720 BROAD # 202 355 SANDERCOCK 3570 RANCH HOUSE # 203 359 CERRO ROMAULDO 359 HILL; GRID J-08 3591 SACRAMENTO 348 TOLOSA & LA CANADA 349 TASSAJARA N # A 352 FOOTHILL 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-13 3530 RANCH HOUSE; 105; GRID N-14 344 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 3443 MIGUELITO & VIA ESTEBAN 3448 EDGEWOOD & TANGLEWOOD 346 HATHWAY; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 348 TASSAJARA N 338 CUESTA & FELTON 3380 BULLOCK 3395 HIGUERA S # 22; GRID J-15 3395 HIGUERA S # 65; GRID J-15 3396 JOHNSON 333 ELKS # 19; AREA OF; GRID I-13 333 ELKS # 8; GRID I-13 333 LUNETA & TASSAJARA S 333 MADONNA RD; EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL; GRID H-13 334 LA CANADA 324 BUENA VISTA 324 CERRO ROMAULDO 326 CHRISTINA 3280 LAVENDER; AREA OF; GRID M-14 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 524 FELTON 526 OAKRIDGE 528 HATHWAY # D; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 510 STANFORD 513 JEFFREY 514 PATRICIA 516 MITCHELL 516 STONERIDGE 500 BLK HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 500 HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 ; BLK OF 501 KENTUCKY 505 BRIZZOLARA 508 HATHWAY 467 BRANCH 468 LEFF; GRID J-11 481 ISLAY 490 LUNETA & VERDE 500 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 431 CHORRO & LINCOLN 434 HATHWAY 447 CHORRO N 456 HIGH; GRID K-11 462 PISMO 415 CHORRO N 415 CHORRO N # 4; GRID I-05 415 DANA 42 VERDE 424 HATHWAY 400 BLK PACIFIC; GRID J-10 400 BLK SANDERCOCK; GRID K-11 403 BRANCH 410 CHORRO 410 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 398 FERRINI & FELTON 398 SAN MIGUEL 40 CHORRO & MEINECKE 400 BLK DANA; GRID J-10 400 BLK FERRINI; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 395 CHORRO N & BOYSEN 396 LINCOLN & MOUNTAIN VIEW 3960 HIGUERA S # 214; GRID I-16 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 680 CHORRO # 5 688 MORRO & PEACH 699 MONTEREY; 600 BLK 700 BLK TORO; GRID K-08 655 TORO 656 TORO 670 CHORRO # C; GRID J-08 672 HIGUERA # 200; THE CENTER YOGA STUDIO, GRID J-09 680 CHORRO # 1 627 BROAD; GRID J-09 639 PISMO 646 STANFORD 650 SWEENEY 653 STANFORD 603 FELTON; GRID I-05 603 JOHNSON # 15; GRID K-07 603 LUNETA 620 CALIFORNIA # G; COASTAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY 624 GROVE 599 COUPER # 3; BEHIND 60 BROAD # A 60 CASA # E23; GRID J-06 600 BLK COUPER; GRID I-04; GRID I-05 600 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-04; GRID H-05 572 FOOTHILL # 17; GRID I-06 575 STANFORD 578 BUCHON 588 STANFORD; GRID I-05 593 LUNETA 555 RAMONA # 40; GRID I-06 555 WESTMONT # 213; GRID I-04 559 MARSH 567 HATHWAY 570 HIGUERA 536 HATHWAY 545 BRIZZOLARA 546 LEFF 550 FOOTHILL 550 HIGUERA # 6A; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 534 HATHWAY 536 ELLEN 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 894 LINCOLN 895 MADONNA; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 69; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 72; SAN LUIS RANCH 905 MADONNA # 78; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-14 866 LEFF # D; GRID K-10 87 FOOTHILL 880 ALYSSUM; AREA OF GRID N-16 887 NIPOMO 890 PISMO # B; GRID K-10 851 HIGUERA 854 PISMO 855 AEROVISTA; GRID M-18 860 BOYSEN 860 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 830 BOYSEN # 9; GRID J-06 830 RICARDO 836 PACIFIC 842 TARRAGON 849 HIGUERA # 231; GRID K-09 800 BLK HUMBERT; GRID L-12; GRID L-12 816 COLUMBINE 825 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-13; GRID H-14 83 STENNER; GRID K-06 830 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 777 WOODBRIDGE ; PACIFIC BUILDERS 785 MORRO # C; GRID J-09 79 CHUPARROSA 790 FOOTHILL # 218; GRID J-06 799 ORCUTT; AREA OF; GRID M-14 741 PATRICIA 745 MILL; GRID J-09 747 LEFF 750 CHORRO # 3 77 HIGHLAND 717 GRAND 721 JOHNSON # 14 722 BOYSEN # 4; GRID I-05 722 BOYSEN # 5; GRID I-05 740 FOOTHILL 700 BLK WOODBRIDGE; GRID L-12 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-07-01 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 ZACA KENTUCKY LEGACY; GRID H-14 RR TRACKS AT END OF TORO AND LEFF; GRID L-09 RTA GOVERNMENT CENTER PALM AND OSOS; GRID K-09 SANDERCOCK 980 TARRAGON; AREA OF ; GRID M-14 990 PALM ALPHONSO & EMILY; GRID L-12 FOREST & TERRA; GRID H-14; HOPE 948 BAY LEAF; AREA OF; GRID M-14 955 MONTEREY 962 MONTEREY 969 TORO 973 GOLDENROD 6/23/2025 4:37:03 PM 265 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:37 PM To:Parzanese, Joe Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I just started reviewing the Weekly Crime report and noticed that the 1042 Walnut is on here twice with the GRID listing separating out. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM 266 To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, 267 In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 268 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:20 PM To:Parzanese, Joe Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Ah okay. Thank you! From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. 269 From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. 270 Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 271 From:Parzanese, Joe Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:16 PM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch I think I discovered the issue, there’s two line items for 1327 Foothill. address total_calls total_cites total_dacs tot al_combined 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 5 4 0 4 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 4 2 0 2 Not sure why the address is like that for four calls, with the grid repeated, and not repeated for five calls. I’ll see what I can do to resolve the issue on the report. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 3:43 PM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I’m rolling through this report, and I don’t think all the data has been grabbed, and no clue why. Example, 1327 Foothill on this report is showing 4 calls and 2 cites but attached is what actually happened in this same time frame, 9 calls and 6 citations. Help. Many thanks, CW From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? 272 http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc 273 Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 274 From:RQN of SLO <rqn.board@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 4:10 PM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Planning Commission, Item 4a Dear Chairman Houghton and Planning Commissioners, Request Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Fraternities have a choice of where to hold their events. Review of several CSU AB 524* reports show fraternity events at other CSU locations being held at the chapter house, at various on-campus locations and at third-party locations/venues. However, fraternities in San Luis Obispo hold their parties/events, except maybe chapter meetings, at their main chapter house or at a satellite house. This is the problem. Delta Upsilon has chosen to continue to hold noisy events with excessive numbers of attendees at their main and satellite houses, despite being given multiple verbal and written warnings, noise citations and notices of violation. It appears obvious that the chapter president and members of Delta Upsilon have no respect for our city or its laws. It is time that these individuals take responsibility for their actions and for the disruption they cause to others, be more respectful to their neighbors and the city where they have chosen to live, and find a sensible way to hold their events – for example, at third-party venues. Until that happens it does not appear that they have earned the privilege of having their Conditional Use Permit continue in any form. Until they show the respect due others, we recommend their Conditional Use Permit be revoked. Sincerely, /S/ Sandra Rowley Chairperson, RQN Addendum: Excerpts from MC 9.12.050 and 9.12.060 *AB 524 , passed by the State Legislature, requires fraternities (and sororities) to disclose various types of information - number of members, average grade point, funds raised for charity - and most important to us, the addresses where various events occurred during the past academic year. This last report is being manipulated by Cal Poly by using the generic term “San Luis Obispo” in lieu of the street address. In essence the Cal Poly Administration is doing everything it can to thwart the city’s ability to identify dwellings of new fraternities and of additional satellite houses and enforce our municipal codes. Addendum 275 In addition to the above comments, I wish to note the following: The hearing officer who heard the appeal of the citation issued to Delta Upsilon on February 7, 2025, was incorrect in basing his ruling on the standard of “50 feet from the property line” when the standard is actually “50 feet from the noisemaker” if it is between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. If, however, the noise is heard between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., the standard is only “crossing a residential or commercial property line.” Depending on the time of day, the location of the source of the noise and the location of the issuing officer, the conclusion of the hearing officer may not have been an accurate interpretation of the facts. 276 279 From:Szentesi, Whit Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 2:46 PM To:Hermann, Greg Subject:RE: Grand Jury Report Recommended holding statement if we get asked, based on these talking points: “ ” Thanks, Whit Whitney Szentesi pronouns she/her/hers Public Communications Manager E wszentes@slocity.org C 805.440.5446 Stay informed by signing up for e-notifications Book a meeting with me From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 1:28 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Grand Jury Report Importance: High Hi there, FYI and let’s discuss a holding statement when you have a moment. Greg From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. 280 Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 281 From:Armas, Sara Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 1:41 PM To:David Houghton Cc:Corey, Tyler; Eric Tolle; Purrington, Teresa Subject:6/25/2025 PC Script Attachments:PC Script for 06-25-2025.pdf Good afternoon Chair Houghton, Attached is the script for Wednesday’s Planning Commission meeting. We will make sure a printed copy is available for you on the dais. We are also aware of one planned absence, Commissioner Flores. Have a great day! Sara Armas pronouns she/her/hers Deputy City Clerk I City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SArmas@slocity.org T 805.781.7110 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 Planning Commission Script June 25, 2025, 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo _____________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER “Good evening, this is Chair Dave Houghton, and I would like to call this Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission to order. “Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance.” “Would City Clerk Teresa Purrington please call roll?” 2. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA “At this time, we will hear any public comment for items not on tonight’s agenda. Items raised are generally referred to staff and, if action by the Commission is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting.” “City Clerk, do we have any public comment?” 3. CONSENT 3.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - JUNE 11, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES “Before we vote, do any Commissioners have comments on Consent?” “Do I have a Motion and Second to approve Consent?” “All in favor say AYE” “All opposed say NO” 2 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS “Any court challenge to the action taken on public hearing items on this agenda may be limited to considering only those issues raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo at, or prior to, the public hearing. If you wish to speak, please give your name and address for the record. Please limit your comments to three minutes.” 4.a “The Public Hearing Item before us is to RE-REVIEW AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY LOCATED AT 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. “I would like to ask each Commissioner for their ex-parte disclosures of contact with anyone who has provided information to Commissioners not on the record, so that information may be used as part of their decision-making process.”” “Would Assistant Planner Mallory Patino please present the report?” Recommendation: Review the existing Conditional Use Permit, U 36-09, for consistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and other policy documents and either 1) modify the Use Permit with revised Findings and Conditions of Approval, or 2) revoke the Use Permit. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. QUESTIONS OF STAFF *PC Members ask questions of staff APPLICANT PRESENTATION (Limit to 10 minutes) QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT *PC Members ask questions of the applicant PUBLIC COMMENT “City Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?” ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OF STAFF “Do any Commissioners have questions before we call for a vote?” 3 VOTE PROCEDURE “Do I have a Motion and Second?” “We have a motion and a second, is there any further deliberation before we call roll?” “Will the City Clerk please call the roll of the motion?” 4.b REVIEW OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO REVOKE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, RELATED TO A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED AT 1144 CHORRO STREET, FOR SEVEN (7) PROPERTIES “The Public Hearing Item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to revoke the Planned Development Overlay at 1144 Chorro Street has been continued to the July 9, 2025 Meeting. “Would Associate Planner Hannah or another staff member like to make any comments regarding the continuation of this item?” “As this item was noticed in the paper and postcards were sent to surrounding property owners, the Commission will still accept public comment.” “City Clerk, do we have any public comment on this item?” 5. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION 5.a STAFF UPDATES AND AGENDA FORECAST “Would Deputy Community Development Director Tyler Corey please provide the update?” 6. ADJOURNMENT The next Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for July 9, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. 282 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 1:28 PM To:Szentesi, Whit Subject:FW: Grand Jury Report Hi there, FYI and let’s discuss a holding statement when you have a moment. Greg From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 283 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 284 From:Dietrick, Christine Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 11:57 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Scott, Rick; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:RE: Grand Jury Report Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) 285 Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 286 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 11:53 AM To:Dietrick, Christine; Scott, Rick; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:Grand Jury Report BCC: Council All Good morning, Mayor and Council. Despite our attempts to correct a number of factual inaccuracies in the draft Grand Jury report, they have moved ahead with publishing the report today and made it available here. We have 90 days from today to provide responses to the recommendations. (90 days gets us to September 21st, which is a Sunday, so we likely have until September 19th to submit the formal responses.) Certain recommendations in the report are directed at and require responses from the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the City Manager. We are planning to add a short business item to the July 15th City Council meeting to enable you to consider appointing an ad hoc committee of two Council Members to work with staff to prepare responses to the findings/recommendations that are directed at the Council. We are also going to hold space on the September 2nd City Council meeting for discussion and approval of the completed proposed responses. On the same September 2nd meeting, we will hold space for the City Council to hear the appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP issued to the Delta Chi fraternity (the appeal came in on Friday). Timmi’s team is going to reach out to the appellant (Delta Chi and their counsel) regarding that proposed date today. She will also work with her team to agendize the Planning Commission’s responses to the report’s recommendations that are directed to it. We will provide updates if these proposed dates or recommended procedures change. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 287 From:Menesez, Marjorie Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 9:35 AM To:kathie walker Subject:RE: 726 Foothill Hi Kathie, I ran a search of 726 Foothill from 09/1/22 to present and there were no matching records. From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:56 AM To: Menesez, Marjorie <mmenesez@slocity.org> Subject: 726 Foothill Hi Marjorie, Sorry to bother you again. I'm finishing up my report for the fraternity at 720 Foothill and realized the property has a second address of 726 Foothill. Do you have any records of calls to 726 Foothill from 9/1/2022 to the present? Thank you for your help. -Kathie 288 From:Parzanese, Joe Sent:Monday, June 23, 2025 9:32 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Attachments:NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts_20240901_to_20250622.xlsx Here you go! Let me know if you need anything else! From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:29 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Yes, that’s correct. From: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:28 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Do you mean this report, just with different dates? http://cadreports/reports/report/Crime%20Analysis/NSPY_NSOT_Address_Counts From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2025 9:25 AM To: Parzanese, Joe <jparzanese@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Hi Joe, I need some help running a report for noise data. This is a modified version of the one I’ll need after June 30 th that is NSPY for the whole year. I need September 1, 2024 – June 22, 2025, all NSPY calls and then sorted to show the properties with the most calls, DACs and Citations. Thank you, Christine From: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2025 1:13 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Christine, In anticipation of this meeting next week, could you please provide me some basic noise stats for the past month and/or year? And anything specific to Greek disturbances. Thank you, Rick 289 From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:12 AM To: Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org> Cc: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Purrington, Teresa <TPurring@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Floyd, Aaron <afloyd@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org>; Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org>; Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Subject: Seeking Agenda Items for 6/26 City-University Lunch Mayor Stewart and Council Member Francis, The City is hosting the next City-University quarterly lunch, scheduled for next Thursday, June 26th, from 12:00- 1:30pm. Please let me know if you have any agenda items you would like to add. I have a request out to Cal Poly for their agenda additions as well. In case it might be helpful to review what was discussed at the prior meeting, I have also attached the agenda from the March 20th meeting for your review. If you could please send me any agenda additions by Monday, June 30th, that would be greatly appreciated. You are also welcome to edit the Word document or add comments directly via the below SharePoint link. Thank you in advance! 06-26-2025-City-University Agenda_draft.doc Agenda from previous meeting in March: 03-20-2025-City-University Agenda.doc Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Total Calls Total Cites Total DACS Total CIT and DAC combined 14 3 2 5 8 5 0 5 6 4 1 5 12 3 1 4 9 3 1 4 6 4 0 4 6 4 0 4 5 4 0 4 5 3 1 4 7 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 6 2 1 3 5 3 0 3 5 3 0 3 5 2 1 3 5 2 1 3 5 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 4 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 6 2 0 2 6 2 0 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 0 2 5 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2281 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 146 STENNER; GRID K-07 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 496 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 1793 TONINI; GRID G-15 3350 ROCKVIEW; GRID L-14 66 RAFAEL; GRID I-06 1229 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 482 LUNETA; GRID I-07 1238 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 1621 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 385 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06 561 ELLEN; GRID K-07 1292 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 250 GRAND; GRID L-06 1271 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1646 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 231 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 241 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 334 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 1236 MONTE VISTA; DELTA CHI, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 138 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1844 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 284 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 528 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-07 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID K-06 216 ALBERT; GRID K-06 571 CUESTA; GRID I-05 1555 SLACK; GRID L-06 226 PATRICIA; GRID H-06 1541 SLACK; GRID L-06 175 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1688 MILL; GRID L-07 1264 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU; GRID K-06 NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 Address 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSILON; GRID I-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 7 0 1 1 7 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 136 CERRO; GRID H-06 2090 HAYS; GRID L-06 1185 FOOTHILL # 32; GRID J-06 169 CARPENTER; GRID K-06 1254 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 2315 JOHNSON; GRID M-11 124 STENNER; GRID K-06 363 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 377 ALBERT; GRID L-06 521 LUNETA; GRID I-07 545 COUPER; GRID I-05 589 CUESTA; GRID I-05 183 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 1880 GARFIELD # D; GRID L-07 251 HIGH # 5 331 KENTUCKY # A; GRID K-06 350 SAN MIGUEL; GRID M-06 1172 MURRAY; GRID K-07 1230 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1230 MONTE VISTA # 200; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 130 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 167 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 814 MEINECKE; GRID J-06 12 HATHWAY; GRID K-05; GRID K-05 148 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1681 PHILLIPS; GRID L-07 440 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 1908 LOOMIS; GRID L-06 2069 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 220 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 322 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 529 DARTMOUTH; GRID I-05 1237 MONTE VISTA # 6; GRID K-06 1252 FOOTHILL # 1; GRID K-06 14 HATHWAY; GRID K-05 1820 HOPE; GRID L-06 1841 SLACK; GRID L-06 145 SOUTH # A28; GRID J-12 274 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 548 COUPER; GRID I-05 1218 BOND; GRID K-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 5 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 4 1 0 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 344 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 347 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 532 CUESTA; GRID I-05 189 CARPENTER; GRID K-06 190 STENNER; ALPHA OMICRON PI; GRID K-07 2074 LOOMIS; GRID L-06; GRID L-07 2134 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRID K-06 529 COUPER; GRID I-05 1103 TIBURON; GRID N-15 1125 OCEANAIRE; GRID G-13 167 CERRO; GRID H-06 177 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1276 BOND; GRID K-06 151 STENNER; GRID K-07 195 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 2 TASSAJARA S; GRID I-06 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06; GRID K-06 359 TOLOSA; GRID I-05 388 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06 483 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 50 DEL MAR; GRID H-06 550 HIGUERA # 2B; GRID J-10 1350 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1453 SLACK; GRID K-06 1525 SLACK; GRID L-06 1924 HAYS; GRID L-06 313 PATRICIA; GRID H-05 561 LUNETA; GRID I-07 895 LINCOLN; GRID J-08 1105 LEFF; GRID L-10 1116 PEACH; GRID K-08 1254 BOND; GRID K-06 1267 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 1739 WILSON; GRID L-07 2034 SWAZEY; GRID L-11 2040 SWAZEY; GRID L-11 321 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 227 HIGHLAND; GRID H-05 132 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA GAMMA RHO; GRID J-06 1990 HAYS; GRID L-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1131 OLIVE # 201; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1135 WALNUT; GRID K-08 1181 MURRAY; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1264 FOOTHILL; LAMBDA CHI ALPHA; GRID K-06 679 SANTA ROSA; GRID K-08 725 GRAND; GRID L-07 830 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 836 ORCUTT # 103; GRID M-13 104 ORANGE; GRID K-06 465 PACIFIC # A; GRID J-10 53 PALOMAR # 202; GRID I-06 563 STANFORD; GRID I-05 649 STANFORD; GRID I-05 655 JOHNSON; GRID K-07 336 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 345 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06 360 CHORRO; GRID J-08 383 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 425 LUNETA; GRID I-07 2322 JOHNSON; GRID M-11 236 ALBERT; GRID K-06 278 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 285 HERMOSA; GRID H-07 288 CHORRO; GRID J-08 1965 HUASNA; GRID H-15 2042 HAYS; GRID L-06 2049 SIERRA; GRID L-10 2099 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 2104 LOOMIS; GRID M-07 1659 CORONA; GRID M-11 1677 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 1684 MILL; GRID L-07 1690 PHILLIPS; GRID L-07 1731 SANTA ROSA # A; GRID L-10 1128 PEACH; GRID K-08 1311 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 1435 PHILLIPS # C; GRID K-07 146 STENNER # 1; GRID K-07 1515 OCEANAIRE; GRID H-13 844 UPHAM; KAPPA CHI FRATERNITY; GRID K-11 1039 FOREST; GRID H-14 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 346 GRAND; GRID L-06 346 GRAND; GRID L-06; GRID L-06 347 LA CANADA; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 385 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I-06 410 GRAND; GRID L-06 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06; 281 HATHWAY # 1/2; GRID K-06 286 TASSAJARA N; GRID I-06 3057 HIGUERA S # 237; GRID J-14; GRID J-14 331 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-06 227 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-06; GRID H-06 253 ALBERT; GRID K-06 263 HIGH; GRID J-11 267 HERMOSA; GRID H-07 28 CHORRO; GRID J-06 2063 HOPE; GRID L-06 2075 HOPE; GRID L-06 2077 HOPE 2119 HUTTON; GRID K-11; GRID K-11 22 CHORRO # 311 1959 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 1990 HOPE; GRID L-06 2022 FIXLINI; GRID M-10 2022 FIXLINI; GRID M-10; GRID M-10 205 ALBERT; GRID K-06 1688 MILL; GRID L-07; GRID L-07 1800 BLK HOPE; GRID L-06 183 STENNER # 7; GRID K-07 1840 HOPE; GRID L-06 1877 LIMA; GRID H-14 142 TASSAJARA N; GRID I-06 1429 SLACK; GRID K-06 146 STENNER # 3; GRID K-07 1464 FOOTHILL; ALPHA CHI OMEGA; GRID K-05 166 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 1275 STAFFORD; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU, GRID K-06; GRID K-06 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA PSI, GRID K-05; GRID K-05 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA PSI; GRID K-05 1351 ROYAL # 7; GRID G-14 1273 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 11144 WALNUT # 10; GRID K-08 1131 WALNUT; AREA;GRID K-08 1133 PALM; GRID K-08 1134 MONTALBAN # 1; GRID J-07 1139 WALNUT # B; GRID K-08 114 BRESSI; GRID I-07 107 HIGHLAND; GRID H-05 108 CRANDALL; GRID K-05 1085 CORTEZ; GRID F-13 111 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1127 FOOTHILL # 107 1026 GEORGE; GRID L-10 1031 SOUTHWOOD # E; GRID M-12 1035 OAK; GRID J-07 1043 SOUTHWOOD # I; GRID M-12 1050 FOOTHILL # 6C; GRID; THE SLO, GRID J-06; THE SLO STUDEN 71 PALOMAR; GRID I-07 84 MUSTANG; GRID J-06 860 MURRAY; GRID J-07 940 SANTA ROSA; GRID K-08; GRID K-09 1012 SAN ADRIANO; GRID F-13 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU, GRID L-07; GRID L-07; GRID L-07 671 PARK; GRID L-07 674 LEFF; GRID K-11 696 CHURCH; GRID K-11; GRID K-11 700 GRAND; CHI OMEGA; GRID L-07 600 MARSH; MCCARTHYS COCKTAIL LOUNG; GRID J-10 615 GRAND; SIGMA KAPPA; GRID L-07 641 PISMO # 1 647 CUESTA; GRID I-05 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU, GRID L-07 53 PALOMAR # 202 536 COUPER; GRID I-05 541 LUNETA; GRID I-07 544 PRINCETON; GRID H-05 553 COUPER; GRID I-05 410 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 416 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 416 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 476 SANDERCOCK; GRID K-11; GRID K-11 49 PALOMAR # 203; GRID I-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1439 PHILLIPS; GRID K-07 1445 PREFUMO CANYON # 12; GRID F-13 1383 AVALON; GRID G-13 1391 SAN MARCOS; GRID M-12 1394 SOUTHWOOD; GRID N-13 1405 SLACK; GRID K-06 1435 SOUTHWOOD; GRID N-13 1330 SOUTHWOOD # 17; ACCESS NEXT TO 1352, GRID N-13 1345 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1348 PEACH; GRID K-08; GRID K-08 1367 HIGUERA; GRID L-08 1367 MILL; GRID K-08 1314 FOOTHILL # D; GRID K-06 1317 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 1320 FOOTHILL # C2; GRID K-05 1324 CAVALIER; GRID G-13 133 ORANGE; GRID K-06 1275 STAFFORD # A; GRID K-07 1275 STAFFORD # B; GRID K-07 1280 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 1281 BRIARWOOD; GRID M-13 131 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 ; POSS ADDRESS 1239 FOOTHILL # 107; GRID K-06 1248 STAFFORD; POSS; GRID K-07 1252 FOOTHILL # 9; WATSON MANOR APTS; GRID K-06 1262 MURRAY # 18; GRID K-07 1262 MURRAY # 5; GRID K-07; NEXT TO; GRID K-07 1217 MILL; GRID K-08 1227 CORAL; GRID G-14 1227 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1230 MURRAY # 7; GRID K-07; UNIVERSITY APARTMENTS; GRID K- 1234 STAFFORD; ACCESS OFF HATHWAY ALLY, GRID K-06; GRID K- 120 DEL SUR; GRID H-06 1206 GALLEON # B; GRID G-13 121 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03 1213 CORAL; GRID G-14 1214 MARINERS; GRID G-13 1156 PEACH; GRID K-08 1167 ATASCADERO; GRID G-14 119 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 1191 ATASCADERO; GRID G-14 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 2052 JOHNSON; GRID M-10; GRID L-10 2061 HOPE; GRID L-06 2077 HOPE; GRID L-06; GRID L-06 1885 GARFIELD; #13 TRIANGLE APTS; GRID L-07 189 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 1944 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 2045 SLACK; GRID L-06 2050 HOPE; GRID L-06; GRID L-06 177 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 1853 PINECOVE; GRID H-14 1857 HOMESTEAD; GRID H-14 1861 HOPE; GRID L-06 1877 OCEANAIRE; GRID H-14 1720 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 1720 LA LUNA; GRID E-12 1731 SANTA ROSA # B; GRID L-10 1750 PREFUMO CANYON # 67 176 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 1703 SANTA BARBARA; ESTABLISHMENT APTS; GRID K-10 1706 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06; GRID L-06 1710 HUASNA; GRID G-14 172 HIGHLAND; GRID H-05 1720 DIABLO; GRID E-12 168 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 169 FERRINI; GRID I-06 1690 WILSON; GRID L-07 1698 WILSON; GRID L-07 1702 DEVAUL; GRID F-15; GRID F-15 1591 MILL; GRID L-07 1634 MILL # 8; GRID L-07 1636 OCEANAIRE; GRID H-14 1658 MILL # 1; GRID L-07 1658 MILL # 2; GRID L-07 1472 GARCIA; GRID G-15 1510 BROAD; GRID K-10; GRID K-10 1512 HIGUERA; GRID L-08 1538 BALBOA; GRID G-13 1558 CUCARACHA; GRID F-14 1454 QUARRY; GRID N-14 146 STENNER # 5; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1464 GULF; GRID G-13 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 312 LUNETA; GRID I-07 313 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 316 LEROY; GRID L-06 316 RAMONA; GRID H-06 3003 ROCKVIEW # 6; GRID L-13 302 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 304 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 305 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-05 311 DEL MAR; GRID H-06 289 RAMONA; GRID H-06 293 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 296 RAMONA; GRID H-06 300 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 3003 ROCKVIEW # 5; GRID L-13 269 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06; GRID H-06 276 GRAVES; GRID L-06 276 RAMONA; GRID H-06 278 ALBERT; GRID K-06 2869 JOHNSON; GRID M-12 258 CALIFORNIA # C3; GRID K-06 258 CHORRO; GRID J-07 258 WARREN; GRID H-05 263 CHORRO N # 14; GRID I-06; GRID I-06 265 ALBERT; GRID K-06 2457 SENDERO; GRID K-12 248 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06 248 GRAND; GRID L-06 248 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 2527 BROAD; GRID L-12; GRID L-12 233 CATALINA; GRID H-07 234 TASSAJARA N; GRID I-06; GRID I-06 235 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 237 CATALINA; GRID H-07 2387 BOULEVARD DEL CAMPO; GRID L-12 223 ROSITA; GRID H-06 225 LA CANADA; GRID I-06 225 RAMONA; GRID H-06 228 CHORRO N # 20; GRID J-06 228 CUESTA; GRID I-06 215 ALBERT; GRID K-06 2155 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 607 GRAND # 10 607 GRAND # 11; GRID L-07 626 BROAD # 11; GRID J-08 631 JOHNSON # A; GRID K-07 641 PISMO # 1; GRID K-10 562 SOUTH; GRID K-11 570 PEACH # 35; GRID J-09 572 FOOTHILL # 4; GRID I-06 577 PRINCETON; GRID I-05; GRID H-05 590 FELTON; GRID I-05 521 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 526 KENTUCKY # 2; GRID K-07 551 HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 555 RAMONA # 14; GRID I-06 561 COUPER; GRID I-05 451 CHORRO N; GRID I-05 458 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 464 BROAD; GRID J-08 49 PALOMAR # 104; GRID I-06 492 FELTON; GRID I-05 399 JEFFREY; GRID H-05 415 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 415 CHORRO N # 10 440 PACIFIC # D; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 446 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 366 SAN MIGUEL; GRID M-06 379 ALBERT; GRID L-06 380 CHRISTINA; GRID H-05; GRID H-05 385 ALBERT; GRID L-06 3860 HIGUERA S # 240; GRID I-16 3550 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-14 3591 SACRAMENTO # 6; GRID M-15 361 LA CANADA; GRID I-05 362 HATHWAY; GRID K-06; X FROM 364 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 3340 JOHNSON; GRID N-13 34 RAFAEL; GRID I-06 342 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 347 JEFFREY; POSS GRID H-05 355 CHORRO N # B; GRID I-06 3180 CALLE JAZMIN; GRID K-14 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 03419 ROBERTO # C; SLO CIDER CO; GRID M-14 3055 DUNCAN # D; SHINDIG CIDER; GRID M-13 3722 BROAD # 108; GRID M-15 1229 PEACH # E; GRID K-08 1334 PALM # 8; GRID K-08 2038 CHORRO # 3 801 GRAND; VETS HALL; GRID L-07 1234 BROAD; LIBERTINE BREWING COMPANY; GRID K-10 1229 PEACH; JOHNSON APTS; GRID K-08 136 STENNER; GRID K-06 1750 BISHOP # 107; GRID M-10 9 VERDE; GRID I-06 905 MADONNA # 65; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 93 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 132 STENNER; GRID K-06 673 HIGUERA; THE MARK; GRID J-10 810 GROVE; GRID L-07 813 MEINECKE; GRID J-06 830 BOYSEN # 16; GRID J-06 841 BOYSEN # 35; GRID J-06 892 GROVE; GRID L-08; GRID L-07 758 GROVE; GRID L-07 781 MARSH # 240; GRID K-09 785 SERRANO; GRID I-07 8 ELM; GRID I-06 805 BOYSEN # 19 730 BOYSEN # 4 732 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 74 BROAD; GRID J-07 741 PASATIEMPO; GRID H-04 745 GRAND; GRID L-07 677 MORRO # 3; GRID J-08 678 TORO; GRID K-08 7 ELM; GRID I-06 70 MUSTANG; GRID J-06 710 CALIFORNIA; GRID K-07; GRID L-07 641 SERRANO; GRID I-07 645 FUNSTON; GRID K-12 66 RAFAEL # 1/2; GRID I-06 67 PALOMAR # 215; GRID I-07; GRID I-07 677 CAUDILL # 1/2; GRID L-12 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2240 EMILY # 202; GRID L-12 2295 JOHNSON; GRID M-11 2028 KING; GRID K-11 2034 SANTA BARBARA; MINERS HARDWARE; GRID K-11 2038 CHORRO # 3; GRID K-11 216 CHORRO; GRID J-07 2240 EMILY # 202 1615 PHILLIPS; GRID L-07 1650 CRESTVIEW; GRID N-13 1705 FARRIER; GRID G-15 1724 FARRIER; GRID G-15 185 BROAD; GRID J-07 1252 FOOTHILL # 1 1329 ALDER; GRID O-17 1512 MORRO; GRID K-10 1556 GULF; GRID H-13 1587 ETO; GRID F-14 NEWPORT & CORAL; GRID G-13; GRID G-14 1 MUSTANG; MUSTANG VILLAGE OFFICE; GRID J-06 1011 RAILROAD; AMTRAK RAILROAD STATION; GRID L-10 1050 ORCUTT; LAUNDRY EXPRESS; GRID M-13 1125 GARDEN; HOTEL CERRO; GRID K-09 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSILON, GRID I-06; GRID I-06 777 MILL # 3; GRID J-09 FOOTHILL & CARPENTER; GRID K-06 HATHWAY ALLEY; GRID K-06 MURRAY & STENNER; GRID K-07 2741 MCMILLAN; GRID L-13 468 LEFF # B 550 HIGUERA; GRID J-10 611 MOUNTAIN VIEW; GRID J-08 654 GRAVES; GRID L-07 1625 CALLE JOAQUIN; MOTEL 6 SOUTH; GRID H-17 1700 OSOS; GRID K-10 234 FERRINI; GRID I-06 241 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 2505 AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 GARDEN & HIGUERA; GRID K-09 1114 ORCUTT; GRID M-13 152 CUESTA; GRID I-06 1530 CALLE JOAQUIN; HAMPTON INN; GRID H-17 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 100 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 1000 BLK TIBURON; GRID N-15 101 GRAVES; GRID L-06 PARK & MILL; GRID L-07 SOUTHWOOD & FLORA; GRID N-13 STENNER & MURRAY; GRID K-07 TIBURON & RIGHETTI RANCH; GRID N-15 WILSON & PARK; GRID L-07 85 STENNER # C; GRID K-06 BROAD & ROCKVIEW; GRID L-14 FOOTHILL & CRANDALL; GRID K-06 LEFF & OSOS; GRID K-10 ORCUTT & BROAD; GRID L-13 636 CUESTA; GRID I-05 67 CHORRO; GRID J-07 744 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 845 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-14; GRID H-14 845 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 416 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06; GRID L-06 50 CHORRO; GRID J-06 54 BROAD; GRID J-06 555 RAMONA; VALENCIA APARTMENTS; GRID I-06 607 GRAND; KRIS KAR APARTMENTS, GRID L-07; GRID L-07 370 ISLAY; GRID J-11 390 SANTA ROSA; REAR OF JACK IN THE BOX; GRID J-07 3960 HIGUERA S # 197; GRID I-16 399 JAYCEE; GRID H-05 411 HENDERSON; GRID L-06 323 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I-06 333 ELKS # 18 345 BUENA VISTA; GRID L-06 3550 RANCH HOUSE; GRID N-14 359 GRAVES; GRID L-06 279 HERMOSA; GRID H-07 284 LA CANADA; GRID I-06 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06 3000 AUGUSTA; JUDSON TERRACE; GRID M-12 3055 DUNCAN # D; SHINDIG CIDER 260 CRAIG; GRID H-06 265 CHORRO N; GRID I-06 2755 AUGUSTA; SINSHEIMER SCHOOL; GRID M-12 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1144 ORCUTT # A; GRID M-13 1148 FERNWOOD # 2; GRID M-13 1155 MURRAY; SIERRA APARTMENTS, GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1155 MURRAY; SIERRA APARTMENTS; GRID K-07 1131 OLIVE # 302 11321 LOS OSOS VALLEY # K 1134 MONTALBAN; GRID J-07 1140 MONTALBAN; BEHIND; GRID J-07 1140 MONTALBAN; MONTALBAN MANOR, GRID J-07; GRID J-07 1127 BROAD; GOLD BAR PIERCING; GRID J-10 1127 FOOTHILL # 109; AREA;GRID J-06 1127 FOOTHILL # 204 1128 IRIS; GRID L-10 1128 PEACH; REAR OF; GRID K-08 1111 HIGUERA; SLO CLASSICAL ACADEMY; GRID K-09 1114 ORCUTT # D; GRID M-13 1114 ORCUTT # E; GRID M-13 11245 LOS OSOS VALLEY; CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH; GRID F- 1126 WISTERIA; GRID N-17 1092 ORCUTT # 8; BELOW; GRID M-13 1095 ORCUTT; GRID M-13 1100 ATASCADERO; GRID H-13 1100 BLK OSOS; GRID K-09 111 MUSTANG BLDG; GRID J-05 1050 FOOTHILL; THE SLO, GRID J-06; THE SLO STUDENT LIVING, 106 SANTA ROSA; GRID J-07 1062 ISLAY # B; GRID K-10 107 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 109 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 1035 SOUTHWOOD # F; GRID M-12 1041 SOUTHWOOD # D; GRID M-12 1042 PALM; DAVID T HURST LAW OFFICE; GRID K-08 1050 FOOTHILL # 13F 1050 FOOTHILL # 1R; GRID J-06 1029 SOUTHWOOD # M; GRID M-12 1029 SOUTHWOOD # O; GRID M-12 1029 SOUTHWOOD; PARKWOOD VILLAGE, GRID M-12; GRID M- 1034 YARROW; ACROSS FROM; GRID N-17 1035 SAN ADRIANO; GRID F-13 1026 MILL; GRID K-08 1028 CHURCH; GRID L-10 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1301 FOOTHILL # C; GRID K-06 1304 FOOTHILL; SIGMA NU, GRID K-06; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 131 GRAVES; GRID L-06 1311 FOOTHILL; AREA OF;GRID K-06 1315 FOOTHILL; AREA OF; GRID K-06 1275 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1290 FOOTHILL; ALPHA PHI; GRID K-06 1292 SAN MATEO; GRID M-11 1296 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 1300 BLK FOOTHILL; GRID K-06; GRID K-05 1250 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1252 FOOTHILL # 8, AREA OF 1255 ORCUTT # A11; GRID M-13 1260 FREDERICKS # B; GRID K-06 1274 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1232 CORAL; AREA OF GRID G-14 1239 BOND # D; GRID K-06 1239 FOOTHILL; CARHILL CONDOMINIUMS, GRID K-06 1248 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 1248 STAFFORD; RT OF GRID K-07 1215 FOOTHILL; AREA OF;GRID K-06 1220 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 1220 SPONZA # 6; GRID N-14 1226 STAFFORD; AREA OF; GRID K-07 123 CASA; GRID J-06 1206 MURRAY; GRID K-07 1208 CORAL; GRID G-14 1212 DRAKE; GRID G-13 1212 FREDERICKS; AREA; GRID K-06 1212 GARDEN; GARDEN STREET INN BED AND BREAKFAST; GRID 1198 OCEANAIRE; GRID G-13 1198 OCEANAIRE; GRID G-13 ; AREA 12 HATHWAY; GRID K-05 1200 OCEANAIRE # B 1200 OCEANAIRE; GRID G-13 1181 MURRAY; GRID K-07 1183 MURRAY 1185 FOOTHILL # 6 1185 PACIFIC; DALLIDET ADOBE; GRID K-09 1192 LEFF; GRID L-09 1160 LAUREL; CRUX CLIMBING; GRID M-13 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0145 SOUTH # A54 1427 MORRO; GRID K-10 143 CERRO; GRID H-06 1435 PHILLIPS # C; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 1441 SLACK; GRID K-06 145 SOUTH # A29; GRID J-12 1400 BLK SLACK; GRID K-06 1400 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1400 OSOS; MITCHELL PARK; GRID K-10 1422 SOUTHWOOD # A 1425 GARDEN; GRID K-10 1366 SOUTHWOOD; GRID N-13 137 TWIN RIDGE; GRID H-03 1375 BALBOA; AREA OF CL SMITH SCHOOL; GRID G-13 1375 PACIFIC; DILLMAN AND ASSOCIATES; GRID L-09 140 FERRINI # 16 1358 MADONNA; BURGER KING; GRID G-14 1360 LAUREL # 9; GRID N-12; GRID N-12 1360 SONRISA; GRID F-12 1363 PISMO; BEHIND; GRID L-09 1364 FOOTHILL; GRID K-05 1340 SAWLEAF; GRID O-16 1341 PHILLIPS; GRID K-08; GRID K-07 135 CRANDALL; GRID K-06 1350 FOOTHILL; AREA OF; GRID K-05 1352 SOUTHWOOD; GRID N-13; GRID N-13 ; 1335 ELLA # 9; GRID L-10 1335 ELLA; GRID L-10 1335 FOOTHILL; PHI KAPPA PSI, GRID K-05 1337 PHILLIPS # A; GRID K-08 1340 FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 1323 BALBOA; GRID G-13 1328 MADONNA; LAGUNA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER; GRID G- 1330 SOUTHWOOD; X FROM; GRID N-13 1334 GALLEON; GRID G-13 1334 PALM # 5; POSS 1315 FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 ; AREA OF 1315 FOOTHILL;AREA OF; GRID K-06 132 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 1321 JOHNSON; IN THE AREA; SMART AND FINAL; GRID L-09 1321 JOHNSON; SMART AND FINAL; GRID L-09 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1614 SYDNEY; GRID M-11 1615 MORRO; GRID K-10 1592 MADONNA; MADONNA ROAD APTS; GRID F-14 16 MUSTANG; GRID J-06; GRID J-06 160 HIGHLAND; GRID H-05 1605 CALLE JOAQUIN; COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT; GRID H-17 161 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 1578 MADONNA # 85; GRID F-14 1581 EL TIGRE; GRID G-14 1585 CALLE JOAQUIN; HOTEL CALLE JOAQUIN; GRID H-17 159 ORANGE; GRID K-06 159 STENNER # 4 1572 MADONNA # 59 ;APT ABOVE 1575 MONTEREY; LOS PADRES INN; GRID L-08 1578 MADONNA # 81; GRID F-14 1578 MADONNA # 81; GRID F-14; GRID F-14 1578 MADONNA # 85 1542 NEWPORT; GRID G-13 1545 LAUREL; GRID N-12 1545 OCEANAIRE; GRID H-13 1552 EL TIGRE # 7 1552 EL TIGRE; AREA OF; RAINTREE APTS; GRID G-14 1519 ROYAL; AREA OF; GRID F-14 1520 MORRO; GRID K-10 1526 MILL; GRID L-07 1526 OSOS; AREA OF GRID K-10 1535 NEWPORT; GRID G-13 149 CARPENTER; GRID K-06 1500 BLK EL TIGRE; GRID G-14 151 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 1515 ETO; GRID F-15 1515 PALM; GRID L-08 146 STENNER # 2; GRID K-07 1468 FOOTHILL; FRONT PORCH; GRID K-05 147 RAMONA; GRID H-06 1472 FOOTHILL; NEWMAN CATHOLIC COMMUNIT; GRID K-05 1475 SLACK; GRID K-06 145 SOUTH # A54; GRID J-12 145 SOUTH # A54; POSS 145 SOUTH # A62 ;POSS ADDRESS 1458 PREFUMO CANYON; GRID F-13 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1900 BLK CHORRO; GRID K-11 1900 FIXLINI; GRID L-10 1901 BROAD; AREA OF; GRID K-11 1880 GARFIELD # D 1880 GARFIELD; GRID L-07 1885 GARFIELD; TRIANGLE APTS; GRID L-07 190 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 190 SANTA ROSA; SRP; GRID J-07 1861 WILDING; GRID M-09 1866 LOOMIS; GRID L-06 187 TANGO; AREA OF; GRID I-18 187 TANGO; GRID I-19; GRID I-18 1880 GARFIELD # A; GRID L-07 1784 FARRIER; GRID G-15 1797 TANGLEWOOD; GRID O-13 1843 HAYS; GRID L-06 1845 MONTEREY; LA QUINTA INN; GRID L-07 186 RAMONA; GRID H-06 175 CRANDALL; CRANDALL APTS; GRID K-05 1750 BISHOP; GRID M-10 1759 SAN LUIS; GRID L-08 1760 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 1778 TONINI; GRID G-15 171 ORANGE; REAR OF; GRID K-06 1716 SINGLETREE; GRID G-15 1720 TONINI # 104 1730 BISHOP; PROBATION DEPT; GRID M-10 1731 SANTA ROSA; GRID L-10 170 BROOK; ETO PARK; GRID I-12 1700 BLK DEVAUL; GRID F-15 1700 BLK PORTOLA; GRID E-13 1704 OCEANAIRE; GRID H-14 1706 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 1650 CRESTVIEW; GRID N-13; GRID N-13 1661 MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 1663 PHILLIPS; GRID L-07 167 CERRO; GRID H-06; GRID H-06 1690 HILLCREST; GRID L-07 1616 FREDERICKS; GRID L-06 1620 BISHOP; GRID M-10; U:9 163 LONGVIEW; GRID K-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2260 LOOMIS; GRID M-07 228 BROAD; GRID J-07 228 LOS CERROS; GRID H-06 2280 EMILY # 302 220 CALIFORNIA # C; GRID K-06 220 CALIFORNIA; GRID K-06 ; POSS ADDRESS 2240 FLORA; GRID M-10 2240 FLORA; GRID M-10 ; BEH 225 CHORRO; GRID J-07 2121 BROAD; CHILI PEPPERS; GRID K-11 2138 KING; GRID K-11 2140 LOOMIS; GRID M-07 2149 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 22 CHORRO; GRID J-06 21 ZACA # 120; INLINE WAREHOUSE, GRID I-15 210 MADONNA; VAGABOND INN; GRID I-13 210 MARGARITA # 14 2104 LOOMIS; AREA OF; GRID M-07 2110 BROAD; SUNSET NORTH CAR WASH; GRID K-11 205 CRAIG; GRID H-06 2053 HAYS; GRID L-06 206 ALBERT; GRID K-06 2060 PARKER; GRID J-11 2061 HOPE; GRID L-06; GRID L-06 200 SANTA ROSA N # 305;BELOW; GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N # 604; GRI; MUSTANG VILLAGE II, GRID J-06 200 SANTA ROSA N; MUSTANG VILLAGE II 2033 SWAZEY; GRID L-11 2038 CHORRO # 2; GRID K-11 1977 SANTA BARBARA; REAR OF; GRID K-11 199 DEL NORTE; GRID H-06 1990 HAYS; GRID L-06 1991 HAYS; GRID L-06 20 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 195 TANGO; GRID I-19; GRID I-18 1962 HOPE; GRID L-06 1965 HOPE; GRID L-06 1968 CHORRO # A 1968 CHORRO; GRID K-11 1901 BROAD; WREN FOODS, GRID K-11; GRID K-11 1908 CHORRO; GRID K-11 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 300 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-06; GRID H-05 300 BLK TASSAJARA N; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 3000 AUGUSTA; #124; GRID M-12 3000 AUGUSTA; #216 ; JUDSON TERRACE, GRID M-12; GRID M-12 3000 AUGUSTA; #216 JUDSON TERRACE, GRID M-12; GRID M-12 299 ALBERT; GRID K-06 2994 HIGUERA S # 13 300 BLK CHORRO; GRID J-08 300 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 300 BLK GRAND; GRID L-06 286 CHAPLIN; GRID K-06 2880 BROAD; SLO GUILD HALL; GRID L-13 289 FOOTHILL; ACROSS; GRID H-06 2932 AUGUSTA; POSS ADDR; GRID M-12 2935 JOHNSON; GRID N-12 276 HERMOSA; GRID H-07 276 RAMONA; AREA; GRID H-06 279 BRANCH; GRID J-11 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI, GRID K-06 284 HERMOSA; GRID H-07 252 SANDERCOCK; GRID J-11 259 WARREN; GRID H-05 261 CUESTA; PACHECO SCHOOL; GRID I-06 263 BRIDGE; X FROM; GRID J-12 2741 MCMILLAN # B; ABRAHAM STEEL, GRID L-13 2450 BOULEVARD DEL CAMPO; GRID L-12 2459 AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 246 CHORRO; GRID J-07 2478 VICTORIA; GRID L-12 2505 JOHNSON; REAR OF; GRID M-11 237 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 2400 BLK AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 2410 HELENA; GRID M-11 244 CALIFORNIA; KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA; GRID K-06 245 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 2309 JOHNSON; GRID M-11 2318 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 2324 MADRID; GRID K-12 2333 MEADOW; MEADOW PARK; GRID K-12 236 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-06 2280 EMILY # 302; GRID L-12; GRID L-12 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 03396 JOHNSON; CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE; GRID N-13 334 LA CANADA; GRID I-05 3340 JOHNSON; GRID N-12 3380 BULLOCK; GRID M-14 3395 HIGUERA S # 22; GRID J-15 3395 HIGUERA S # 65; GRID J-15 3280 LAVENDER; AREA OF; GRID M-14 333 ELKS # 19; GRID I-13 333 ELKS # 8; GRID I-13 333 ELKS; VALLE VISTA MHP, GRID I-13; GRID I-13 333 MADONNA; EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL; GRID H-13; GRID I-12 3226 VIA ENSENADA; GRID J-14 323 MADONNA; NORDSTROM RACK; GRID I-14 324 BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 324 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I-06 326 CHRISTINA; GRID H-05 319 HIGHLAND; GRID H-05 319 RAMONA; GRID I-06; GRID H-06 3195 ESTELITA; GRID J-14 320 GRAND; GRID L-06 321 CUESTA; GRID I-05 315 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 315 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06; GRID I-06 3150 ROCKVIEW; GRID L-14 3165 BROAD # 102; COOL CAT CAFE; GRID L-13 3172 JOHNSON; ACTIVE CHURCH; GRID N-12 311 GRAND; GRID L-06 311 LONGVIEW # C; GRID K-06 3110 DUNCAN; AREA OF;GRID M-13 3125 ESTELITA # C; GRID J-14 313 SAN MIGUEL; GRID M-06 3051 AUGUSTA; GRID M-12 307 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06; GRID I-06 3075 HIGUERA S # 300 310 GRAVES; GRID L-06 310 SANTA LUCIA; GRID H-05 3000 AUGUSTA; #221; JUDSON TERRACE; GRID M-12 3000 AUGUSTA; JUDSON TERRACE;X THE ST FROM LOC GRID M- 301 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 301 SANTA MARIA; GRID M-06 304 LA CANADA; GRID I-05 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 410 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 410 CHORRO N; TERI LYNN APTS; GRID I-05 400 BLK DANA; GRID J-10 400 BLK FERRINI; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 400 BLK PACIFIC; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 400 BLK SANDERCOCK; GRID K-11 403 BRANCH; GRID K-11 389 JEFFREY; GRID H-05 3900 BROAD; VONS; GRID M-16 391 MONTROSE; GRID H-03 3960 HIGUERA S # 214; GRID I-16 398 SAN MIGUEL; GRID M-06 3720 BROAD # 202 3722 BROAD # 108; GRID M-15; GRID M-15 376 GRAVES; GRID L-06 383 MARGARITA; GRID K-14 3860 HIGUERA S # CS6; GRID I-16; GRID I-16 3684 BROAD # 211 3684 BROAD # 211; GRID M-15; U:16 3684 BROAD; GRID M-15 369 BRANCH; GRID J-11 370 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 359 HILL; GRID J-08 3591 SACRAMENTO; AREA OF 3650 HIGUERA S; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLE, GRID I-16; GRID 3650 HIGUERA S; FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLE,AREA OF GRID I- 367 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I-06 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 209 ; X ALLEYWAY 3530 RANCH HOUSE; GRID N-13; GRID N-14 355 SANDERCOCK; GRID J-11 3570 RANCH HOUSE # 203 359 CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID I-06 348 TASSAJARA N; BEHIND; GRID I-05 349 TASSAJARA N # A 352 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 207; GRID N-13 3520 RANCH HOUSE # 209 344 FOOTHILL; GRID I-06 346 GRAND; GRID L-06; POSS ADDRESS 346 HATHWAY; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 348 HATHWAY; GRID K-06; GRID K-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 546 LEFF; GRID K-11 550 FOOTHILL; MACLELLAN AND ERB CPAS; GRID I-06 550 HIGUERA # 6A; GRID J-10; GRID J-10 536 ELLEN; GRID K-07 536 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 544 PACIFIC # 104 544 PACIFIC # 104; GRID J-10 545 BRIZZOLARA; GRID J-09 528 HATHWAY # A; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 528 HATHWAY # D; GRID K-07; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 532 DANA; GRID J-09 532 DANA;AREA; GRID J-09 534 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 514 PATRICIA; GRID H-05 516 MITCHELL; X FROM; GRID K-13 516 STONERIDGE; GRID K-13 524 FELTON; GRID I-05 526 OAKRIDGE; GRID G-05; GRID H-05 501 KENTUCKY; GRID K-07 505 BRIZZOLARA; CHUMASH FLATS; GRID J-09 508 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 510 STANFORD; GRID I-05 513 JEFFREY; GRID H-05 468 LEFF; GRID J-11 481 ISLAY; GRID J-11 500 BLK CUESTA; GRID I-05 500 BLK HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 500 HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 ; BLK OF 456 HIGH; GRID K-11 462 PISMO; GRID J-10 467 BRANCH; GRID K-11; POSS ADDRESS 468 LEFF # B; GRID J-11; 468 LEFF # B; GRID J-11; GRID J-11 415 DANA; GRID J-10 42 VERDE; GRID I-06 424 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 434 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 447 CHORRO N; GRID I-05 415 CHORRO N # 1; GRID I-05 415 CHORRO N # 4; GRID I-05; GRID I-05 415 CHORRO N; SAN MIGUEL APTS, GRID I-05; GRID I-05 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 700 BLK TORO; GRID K-08 700 BLK WOODBRIDGE; GRID L-12 717 GRAND; GRID L-07 721 JOHNSON # 14; SHERI APARTMENTS 675 CLARION; LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING, GRID M-17 675 CLARION; LIQUID GRAVITY BREWING; GRID M-17 680 CHORRO # 1; GRID J-08 680 CHORRO # 5; GRID J-08; GRID J-08 699 MONTEREY; LOT 15; GRID J-09 656 TORO; GRID K-08 ; X FROM 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU, GRID L-07; GRID L-07 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU; GRID L-07 670 CHORRO # C; GRID J-08 672 HIGUERA # 200; THE CENTER YOGA STUDIO, GRID J-09 639 PISMO; GRID K-10;BEHIND 646 STANFORD; GRID I-05 650 SWEENEY; ALPHA FIRE SPRINKLER CORP; GRID L-13 653 STANFORD; GRID I-05 ; AREA OF 655 TORO; GRID K-08 603 LUNETA; GRID I-07 607 GRAND; KRIS KAR APARTMENTS, GRID L-07 620 CALIFORNIA # G; COASTAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY 624 GROVE; GRID L-07 627 BROAD; GRID J-09 60 CASA # E23; GRID J-06 600 BLK COUPER; GRID I-04; GRID I-05 600 BLK PATRICIA; GRID H-04; GRID H-05 603 FELTON; GRID I-05 603 JOHNSON # 15; GRID K-07; GRID K-07 578 BUCHON; GRID K-10 588 STANFORD; GRID I-05 593 LUNETA; GRID I-07 599 COUPER # 3; BEHIND 60 BROAD # A 559 MARSH; GRID J-10 567 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 570 HIGUERA; THE CREAMERY; GRID J-10 572 FOOTHILL # 17; GRID I-06 575 STANFORD; GRID I-05 555 RAMONA # 40; GRID I-06 555 WESTMONT # 213; GRID I-04 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 890 PISMO # B; GRID K-10 894 LINCOLN; GRID J-08 895 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-14; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 69; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 905 MADONNA # 72; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-14 87 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 875 HUMBERT 875 HUMBERT; GRID L-12 880 ALYSSUM; GRID N-16; GRID N-16 887 NIPOMO; GRID J-09 854 PISMO; GRID K-10 855 AEROVISTA; SLO BREW; GRID M-18 860 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 860 BOYSEN; GRID J-06 866 LEFF # D; GRID K-10 830 RICARDO; EMERGENCY VEHICLES SPECIALIST, GRID M-14; GRI 836 PACIFIC; MARSH STREET PARKING STRUCTURE; GRID K-10 842 TARRAGON; GRID M-14 849 HIGUERA # 231; GRID K-09 851 HIGUERA; COYA; GRID K-09 816 COLUMBINE; GRID M-16 825 MADONNA; SAN LUIS RANCH, GRID H-13; GRID H-14 83 STENNER; GRID K-06 830 BOYSEN # 5; GRID J-06 830 BOYSEN # 9; GRID J-06 790 FOOTHILL # 218; GRID J-06 799 ORCUTT; AREA OF; GRID M-14 800 BLK HUMBERT; GRID L-12; GRID L-12 814 MEINECKE; GRID J-06; GRID J-06 814 MEINECKE; POSS ADDRESS; GRID J-06 750 CHORRO # 3 77 HIGHLAND; GRID G-05 777 WOODBRIDGE; PACIFIC BUILDERS, GRID L-12; GRID L-12 785 MORRO # C; GRID J-09 79 CHUPARROSA; GRID I-17 722 BOYSEN # 5; GRID I-05 740 FOOTHILL W; GRID 653 E 3 741 PATRICIA; GRID H-04 745 MILL; GRID J-09 747 LEFF; GRID K-10; AREA OF 722 BOYSEN # 4; GRID I-05 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0HATHWAY & FREDERICKS; GRID K-06 GARFIELD & GRAND; GRID L-07 GRAND & HAYS; GRID L-06 GRAND & WILSON; GRID L-07 GRAVES & HOPE; GRID L-06 GRAVES & MCCOLLUM; GRID L-06 FELTON & CUESTA; GRID I-05 FERRINI & FELTON; AREA OF; GRID I-05 FOOTHILL & CALIFORNIA; GRID K-06 FOREST & TERRA; GRID H-14; FREDERICKS & KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 DANA & NIPOMO; GRID J-09 DEL MAR & RAMONA; GRID H-06 DEL NORTE & LA ENTRADA; GRID H-06 ELLA & BINNS; AREA OF GRID L-10 EMILY & ALPHONSO; GRID L-12 CHURCH & NIPOMO; GRID K-11 CHURCH & SANTA BARBARA; GRID K-10 CONEJO & ANDREWS; GRID M-08 CORTEZ & PREFUMO CANYON; GRID F-13 CUESTA & HIGHLAND; GRID I-05 CARPENTER & FOOTHILL; GRID K-06 CHORRO & MEINECKE; GRID J-07; GRID J-06 CHORRO & PEACH; GRID J-08 CHORRO & UPHAM; GRID K-11 CHORRO N & BOYSEN; GRID I-05 BEACH & BUCHON; GRID J-10 BROAD & FOOTHILL; GRID J-06; GRID I-06 BROAD & MONTEREY; GRID J-09 BROAD & SOUTH; GRID K-12 CALLE MALVA & CALLE LUPITA; GRID J-14 969 TORO; GRID K-08 973 GOLDENROD; GRID N-17 979 JOHNSON; TWO TEN TATTOO; GRID K-08 980 TARRAGON; GRID M-14 990 PALM; CITY HALL; GRID K-09 905 MADONNA # 78; SAN LUIS RANCH; GRID H-14 940 SANTA ROSA; GRID K-08 948 BAY LEAF; AREA OF; GRID M-14 955 MONTEREY; ANDERSON APTS 962 MONTEREY; URBAN OUTFITTERS; GRID K-09 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PEACH & MORRO; GRID J-08 PHILLIPS & GROVE; GRID L-07 PARK & HILLCREST; GRID L-07 PARK & WILSON; GRID L-07 PATRICIA & CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 PEACH & CHORRO; GRID J-08 PEACH & MILL; GRID K-08 ORCUTT & JOHNSON; GRID N-13 ORCUTT & TIBURON; GRID N-14 PACIFIC & BEACH; GRID J-10 PACIFIC & CHORRO; GRID K-10 PALM & GROVE; GRID L-08 MONTEREY & BROAD; GRID J-09 MONTEREY & JOHNSON; GRID K-08 MORRO & HIGUERA; GRID K-09 MOUNTAIN VIEW & HILL; GRID J-08 NIPOMO & CHURCH; GRID K-11 LUNETA & VERDE; GRID I-07 MADONNA & LOVR; GRID G-14 MIGUELITO & VIA ESTEBAN; GRID M-14 MILL & GROVE; GRID L-07 MILL & JOHNSON; GRID K-08 LINCOLN & CHORRO; GRID J-08 LINCOLN & MOUNTAIN VIEW; GRID J-08 LIZZIE & FIXLINI; GRID L-09 LONGVIEW & SLACK; GRID K-06 LOOMIS & SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06; GRID M-07 KENTUCKY & BOND; GRID K-06 KENTUCKY ALLEY; GRID K-07 LA ENTRADA & RAMONA; GRID H-06 LEFF & SANTA ROSA; GRID L-10 LEGACY; GRID H-14 HILLCREST & GROVE; GRID L-07 HILLCREST & PARK; GRID L-07 HOPE & GRAND; GRID L-06 HOPE; GRID L-06 ISLAY & BEACH; GRID J-11; GRID K-11 HAYS & GRAVES; GRID L-06 HELENA & SYDNEY; GRID M-12 HIGHLAND & CUESTA; GRID I-05 HILL & MOUNTAIN VIEW; GRID J-08 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM NSPY/NSOT Address Counts 2024-09-01 - 2025-06-23 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 WILDING & LIZZIE; GRID M-09 WILLOW & BULLOCK; GRID M-14 ZACA; AREA OF GRID I-16 TASSAJARA S & LUNETA; GRID I-07 TOLOSA & LA CANADA; GRID I-05 VACHELL & VENTURE; GRID I-18 VICENTE & GARCIA; GRID G-15 WALNUT & TORO; GRID K-08 SLACK & GRAVES; GRID L-06 SOUTH & BROAD; GRID K-12 SOUTH & EXPOSITION; GRID J-11; GRID J-12 SYDNEY & AUGUSTA; GRID M-11 TANGLEWOOD & EDGEWOOD; GRID O-13 SANDERCOCK; GRID K-11 SANTA LUCIA & CERRO ROMAULDO; GRID H-06 SANTA ROSA & PALM; AREA OF GRID K-09; GRID K-08 SANTA YNEZ & BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06; GRID L-06 SANTA YNEZ; GRID M-06 RAMONA & LA ENTRADA; GRID H-06 RAMONA & RAFAEL; GRID I-06 RR TRACKS AT END OF TORO AND LEFF; GRID L-09 RTA GOVERNMENT CENTER PALM AND OSOS; GRID K-09 SAN MIGUEL & BUENA VISTA; GRID M-06 PHILLIPS & PARK; GRID L-07 PREFUMO CANYON & SAN ADRIANO; GRID F-13 RAMONA & ELM; GRID I-06 6/23/2025 9:29:15 AM 290 From:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent:Saturday, June 21, 2025 8:34 AM To:Mezzapesa, John Subject:Re: Quick question Hi John, Sorry for the delay I thought I responded! I don’t know when they moved, it was before I got here though and I started in 2019. There is no fraternity and sorority at that location! Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Why Do Pronouns Matter? Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.signature_474445292 From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 8:52:24 AM To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: RE: Quick question Thank you, Elizabeth. What about 1716 Osos? I know KKG was in there but moved out to go to 244 California. Do you know when they moved? Is there currently a recognized fraternity/sorority at this location? John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 12:33 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Quick question Hi John, 291 We do not have any records of that address currently being connected to a fraternity/sorority! It used to be the old Lambda Chi House, but they haven’t been connected to that house since the owner sold it back in 2022 I believe. I am not sure who they ended up renting it to after they moved out. Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 12:22 PM To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: Quick question Hi Elizabeth, I have a couple of questions I am hoping you have answers for… Does Cal Poly currently recognize any fraternity/sorority housed at 1292 Foothill? If not, when was the last time you recognized a fraternity or sorority at 1292 Foothill? Let me know what your records show. Thank you, John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official/ Code Enfocement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 293 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 4:17 PM To:Symens, Sadie; Wooten, Eric; Holcomb, Kelly Subject:RE: Frat PRRs The hearing officer should be sending them to me next week, as we have 10 days to send out the decisions, but I don’t know what day. From: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:12 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs Okay. Let’s plan to send out an email with all that next week, to give them all a bit of a breather from responding to the GJ report 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:06 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs I think CUP definitely. Sarah was also going to do citation appeals. We heard 3 frat noise appeals yesterday (all denied). From: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:00 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs Thanks, Eric. Do any of you remember what else we were supposed to be updating the internal Grand Jury group on other than these PRRs? Was it the CUP revocations? From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 294 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone 295 else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 296 From:Symens, Sadie Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 4:12 PM To:Wooten, Eric; Holcomb, Kelly; Zion, Sarah Subject:RE: Frat PRRs Okay. Let’s plan to send out an email with all that next week, to give them all a bit of a breather from responding to the GJ report 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:06 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs I think CUP definitely. Sarah was also going to do citation appeals. We heard 3 frat noise appeals yesterday (all denied). From: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:00 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs Thanks, Eric. Do any of you remember what else we were supposed to be updating the internal Grand Jury group on other than these PRRs? Was it the CUP revocations? From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 297 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 298 From:Wooten, Eric Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 4:06 PM To:Symens, Sadie; Holcomb, Kelly; Zion, Sarah Subject:RE: Frat PRRs I think CUP definitely. Sarah was also going to do citation appeals. We heard 3 frat noise appeals yesterday (all denied). From: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:00 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs Thanks, Eric. Do any of you remember what else we were supposed to be updating the internal Grand Jury group on other than these PRRs? Was it the CUP revocations? From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 299 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 300 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 4:03 PM To:Symens, Sadie; Wooten, Eric; Holcomb, Kelly Subject:RE: Frat PRRs Admin citation appeal decisions will also be sent, but we just had the hearing so the decisions have not been issued yet. From: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 4:00 PM To: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Frat PRRs Thanks, Eric. Do any of you remember what else we were supposed to be updating the internal Grand Jury group on other than these PRRs? Was it the CUP revocations? From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 301 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 302 From:Symens, Sadie Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 4:00 PM To:Wooten, Eric; Holcomb, Kelly; Zion, Sarah Subject:RE: Frat PRRs Thanks, Eric. Do any of you remember what else we were supposed to be updating the internal Grand Jury group on other than these PRRs? Was it the CUP revocations? From: Wooten, Eric <ewooten@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To: Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org>; Holcomb, Kelly <kholcomb@slocity.org>; Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 303 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 304 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 2:24 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Hanh, Hannah Subject:RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, My apologies on the previous email and this third email as all correct PC Members & Staff are now included. The correspondence received is for Item 4a NOT 4b. Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 2:19 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, My apologies on the previous email, the correspondence received is for Item 4a NOT 4b. Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker 305 Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 2:11 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4b BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Item 4b – REVIEW OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO REVOKE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, RELATED TO A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED AT 1144 CHORRO STREET, FOR SEVEN (7) PROPERTIES - Walker Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 306 From:Hanh, Hannah Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 2:22 PM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a Thanks Andrea. I’ve looped in Mallory, so she is aware of the correspondence. Hannah Hanh Associate Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E hhanh@slocity.org T 805.781.7432 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 2:19 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, My apologies on the previous email, the correspondence received is for Item 4a NOT 4b. Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 307 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 2:11 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4b BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Item 4b – REVIEW OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO REVOKE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, RELATED TO A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED AT 1144 CHORRO STREET, FOR SEVEN (7) PROPERTIES - Walker Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 308 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 2:19 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Corey, Tyler; Hanh, Hannah Subject:RE: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4a BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, My apologies on the previous email, the correspondence received is for Item 4a NOT 4b. Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. ITEM 4a – 720 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (USE-0334-2025) RE-REVIEW OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Walker Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 2:11 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org>; Hanh, Hannah <hhanh@slocity.org> Subject: 06/25/2025 PC Meeting - Agenda Correspondence, Item 4b BCC: PC Members & Staff Hello, Please see the agenda correspondence for the June 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Item 4b – REVIEW OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO REVOKE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, RELATED TO A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED AT 1144 CHORRO STREET, FOR SEVEN (7) PROPERTIES - Walker Best, 309 Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 310 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 2:12 PM To:kathie walker Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Planning Commission, 6/25/2025 Item 4a Hi Kathie, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the committee members. It is now placed in the Planning Commission public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 1:30 PM To: Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission, 6/25/2025 Item 4a Dear Chair Houghton and Planning Commissioners, Thank you for your time and dedication to addressing the complex issues surrounding Cal Poly’s fraternities. I appreciate your patience with the length of this correspondence. Some historical context is necessary to fully understand the scope of the situation. I remain hopeful that, through accountability and collaboration among Cal Poly, the City, Greek Life, and impacted neighborhoods, meaningful solutions can be achieved. How We Got Here: Community Development Department's Efforts There hasn't been oversight or regulation of Cal Poly's fraternities from the City for at least two decades. Community Development Director, Timmi Tway, and Code Enforcement Supervisor, John Mezzapesa, recognized the issue and started working on it shortly after Ms. Tway was hired as Community Development Director in late 2023. Code Enforcement sorted through the existing CUPs to identify which fraternities have CUPs and the conditions of each CUP. Code Enforcement proactively reviewed SLOPD's records and flagged the fraternities with flagrant violations of the conditions of their CUPs. Director Tway and John Mezzapesa deserve credit for beginning 311 to tackle the problem that was historically ignored. That proactive approach has brought several fraternities forward for re-review of their CUPs to the Planning Commission. Most fraternity houses, including main chapter houses, are operating illegally in single-family neighborhoods, which helps illustrate the enormity of the problem that must be addressed. On October 1, 2023, the addresses of Cal Poly's operating fraternity houses were confirmed by Cal Poly's annual AB 524 Report, published online. That was the first year that State law mandated annual reports for Greek life at every college and university in California. The report requires each Greek organization to disclose the dates and locations of every event held during the previous academic year. San Luis Obispo Code Enforcement staff utilized the spreadsheets for Cal Poly's 18 fraternities to confirm over 60 illegal fraternity house locations, mostly in single-family ne ighborhoods, and sent notifications to the property owners beginning in March 2024. Some property owners contacted Cal Poly and/or the City about the notifications of illegal fraternity operations at their investment properties. This backlash led to Cal Poly editing the Reports in July 2024. They erased the addresses of every fraternity event and replaced them with "San Luis Obispo". Cal Poly's subsequent AB 524 Report, published on October 1, 2024, did not include the addresses for the fraternity events held in residential neighborhoods and listed "San Luis Obispo" as the locations. Code Enforcement sent a public records request to Cal Poly, asking for the addresses where registered fraternity events were held in San Luis Obispo, but Cal Poly refused to provide the list of addresses to the City. Therefore, it has been nearly impossible to cite the dozens of illegal fraternity operations in the City's neighborhoods that hold hundreds of parties and events during an academic year. In January 2025, the City Attorney indicated the City is working toward a long-term solution. SLOPD Noise Records for 720 E. Foothill Blvd The Community Development Department has recommended a re-review of Delta Upsilon's Conditional Use Permit at 720 E. Foothill Blvd based on the number of violations of the conditions, including noise complaints to SLOPD, citations issued to the property, and events held by the fraternity that exceed the maximum 21 people allowed for any event or gatheirng in the current CUP. SLOPD's history for 720 E. Foothill Blvd for the past three academic years is below: There aren't complaints after the first week of June, or in July and August, when Cal Poly is not in session. Screenshots of each of the recent calls to SLOPD, after January 29, 2025, are included in this email. 312 Notification from Code Enforcement to Delta Upsilon On January 29, 2025, Delta Upsilon was issued a Notice of Violation for the property at 720 E. Foothill Blvd. The Notice included some of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP and the history of violations, and says the use permit would be reviewed by Community Development for possible re-review by the Planning Commission. The Notice states: "Immediate compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated." After January 29, 720 E. Foothill Blvd had six more noise complaints, and three noise citations were issued to the property. One noise citation was appealed and dismissed because the Hearing Officer determined the noise was not "plainly audible noise 50 feet from the property line". This is the second time this month I have seen the Hearing Officer dismiss a fraternity's noise citation based on a misunderstanding of the City's noise ordinance. The noise ordinance prohibits any "noise disturbance" that is plainly audible "50 feet from the noisemaker", and not the property line. As an example, if someone is causing a noise disturbance in their backyard, and their backyard is 50 feet from another property, and the noise disturbance is plainly audible on another property 50 feet from the noisemaker, then it is a violation of the City's noise ordinance, 24/7. SLOPD has published information on their website here: https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/34766/638336680176730000 Here is the ordinance: After 10 p.m., amplified noise is prohibited from crossing a residential property line. Using Delta Upsilon's property at 720 E. Foothill Blvd as an example, there is a courtyard in the center of the property with a beer dye table, shown in one of their rush videos. A screenshot is below: 313 If people were yelling and making noise in that area, it could potentially cause a noise disturbance for neighboring residents 50 feet from the courtyard. It is not 50 feet from the property line, but it is still a violation of the noise ordinance. An aerial view shows Delta Upsilon's property, below. The white dashed lines are 50 feet long (from the potential noisemaker), the yellow dashed line shows the property line, and the red line shows the boundary 50 feet from the property line. You can see how a neighbor 50 feet away from a courtyard party could hear the noisy party, yet is not 50 feet from the property line. Still, it is a noise violation if it's a "noise disturbance" that can be heard 50 feet from the noisemaker. Otherwise, in the example below, the residents at 732 and 734 Foothill would never be entitled to peace because they are located inside the area that is 50 feet from the fraternity's property line. On 2/6/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:05 p.m. for 'loud music and yelling' and was cleared as a negative violation. 314 On 2/7/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 9:10 p.m. for a 'loud party at the location' and a citation was issued. On 2/7/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:30 p.m. for a 'loud party' and another citation was issued. The fraternity likely appealed the earlier citation, called in at 9:10 p.m., because the noise ordinance prohibits amplified noise from crossing the property line after 10 p.m., and the Hearing Officer's (incorrect) interpretation of the noise ordinance is that noise before 10 p.m. must be plainly audible 50 feet from the property line. On 2/27/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:08 p.m. for a 'loud party', and a citation was issued that lists 65 people at the event. The fraternity knew that the CUP limited occupancy to 21 people for meetings and gatherings, because that information was included in the Notice of Violation that was sent a month earlier, on January 29. They hosted a party with at least 65 people anyway. 315 On 2/28/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 9:20 p.m. for 'loud music' and was cleared as a negative violation. On 3/15/2025, which was "St. Fratty's Day", a complaint was called into SLOPD that morning at 7:16 a.m. for a loud party. SLOPD arrived one hour later, at 8:15 a.m., and cleared the complaint as a negative violation. Delta Upsilon posts videos during rush recruitment, which feature footage from their parties that feature their fraternity house at 720 E. Foothill and various parties: https://vimeo.com/1095113078?share=copy#t=0 The parties shown violate the conditions of the CUP for 720 E. Foothill Blvd, including the current limitation of 21 people for gatherings. Delta Upsilon also has illegal fraternity houses in R1 neighborhoods that operate as full-fledged fraternity houses. There was an increase in events at those locations in the past several months at 281 Albert Drive, 388 Chaplin Lane, and 1868 Loomis Street. I did not realize the CUP for the main chapter house at 720 E. Foothill was being considered for re-review, but now I understand why there was an uptick in parties at Delta Upsilon's illegal fraternity houses. Cal Poly requires events to be registered beforehand with the Greek Life 316 administration; therefore, they have a list of the dates, addresses, and the number of people in attendance for each of Delta Upsilon's events. That list would confirm the increase in events at Delta Upsilon's illegal fraternity houses in the residential neighborhoods, away from 720 E. Foothill, to potentially avoid any more noise complaints at that location. Last month, on May 2, 2025, Delta Upsilon had an enormous party with a live band in the backyard of their illegal fraternity house at 281 Albert Drive. The video posted online says “Delta Upsilon presents The Kilians,” which is a band that played at the Shabang music festival the day after Delta Upsilon's backyard concert. The fraternity installed a tarp from the house to the side fence to hide the view of the backyard party. Delta Upsilon posted a video from the event on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJXia7Uh8kO/?img_index=1. If the link was removed, it can also be seen here: https://vimeo.com/1094575248?share=copy#t=0 SLOPD issued a noise citation to a member of Delta Upsilon for the party, and the citation says there were 50 people at the event. As you can see from the video, there were hundreds of people at the party. Officers don't go into the backyard or count people, and the number of people listed on a noise citation is provided by the person receiving the citation. Therefore, the number is often not an accurate reflection of the actual number of people at a noisy party. Delta Upsilon had another large, noisy event at 281 Albert Drive on May 16, 2025, and, again, installed a tarp to obscure the view into the backyard. On May 30, 2025, Delta Upsilon held a large, noisy party at 388 Chaplin Lane, on the corner of Fredericks St. It appeared to be a sorority exchange because many of the females were dressed alike, wearing the same colors. SLOPD issued a noise citation at around 11:00 p.m. with 100 people listed on the citation. The person who received the citation was Erik "Anders" Ruud, the former president of Delta Upsilon and Interfraternity Council President from January to December 2024. I spoke with Mr. Ruud on November 21, 2024, about parties at 281 Albert Dr and 388 Chaplin Ln, after a Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) meeting. I serve as an alternative Representative for Geographical Neighborhoods and attend the monthly meetings. Unfortunately, he was dismissive toward me. He was also extremely rude to another Representative on the SCLC who has persistently brought up the "fraternity problem" during the monthly SCLC meetings, where Cal Poly has continued to ignore the issue. The general attitude from 317 the fraternities seems to be that they are entitled to have noisy parties, despite any rules or regulations that restrict them. Cal Poly representatives make excuses or distance themselves from the problems faced by nearby neighborhoods. After Sigma Nu's and Delta Chi's CUPs were recently revoked (for fewer violations than Delta Upsilon), Cal Poly released the following statement to KSBY news: "Since an organization's permit is between them and the City, the University doesn't have any information to provide on that topic." While Cal Poly stays silent on the matter, it continues to recruit more fraternities to its campus without any provisions for their fraternity housing accommodations or concern about the adverse impact of its fraternities' parties and events on the San Luis Obispo community. CUP Limitations The current CUP for 720 E. Foothill Blvd allows 14 people to live on the premises and a maximum of 21 people on site for meetings and gatherings. The revised CUP allows 22 people for meetings and gatherings. This occupancy limitation for gatherings is fair and necessary, but has proven to be problematic for every fraternity CUP on file with the City because it is nearly impossible for a fraternity to hold an event and stay within these reasonable limitations. Most Cal Poly fraternities have over 150 members, and parties also include a large percentage of invited female guests. Fraternity parties are loud with amplified music that consistently violates the City's noise ordinance. The increased traffic and yelling while coming and going from fraternity parties add to the adversity of use. The most practical and viable solution to this ever-growing problem is for fraternities to be located on Cal Poly's campus, where they can have large gatherings without impacting residential neighborhoods San Luis Obispo General Plan and Cal Poly's Greek Life The subject of fraternity houses has been included in the City's Housing Element since at least 1994. On 9/20/2024, Fraternities and Sororities were addressed as a "major area of concern" while the Housing Element was adopted, copied below. In 1994, there were a total of 17 sororities and fraternities, and 2,500 students belonged to Greek life. Now, in 2025, there are 28 sororities and fraternities (18 fraternities and 10 sororities) with about 4,500 members, or 20% of Cal Poly's student population. In 1994, the Housing Element, Section 1.28.10, said, "The City will work with Cal Poly University Administration to secure designation of on-campus fraternity/sorority living groups..." 318 In 1997, the City's General Plan indicated there was a "Student housing study underway" concerning on- campus fraternities, which would be implemented "as resources are available." It appears those resources were never available. The City's General Plan, Housing Element, adopted on March 30, 2004, said: 8.2.6: "Locate fraternities and sororities on the Cal Poly University campus . Until that is possible, they should be located in Medium-High and High-Density residential zones near the campus." The wording has not changed, and the current Housing Element adopted in 2020 says the same thing: 8.5: "Locate fraternities and sororities on the Cal Poly University campus . Until that is possible, they should be located in Medium-High and High-Density residential zones near the campus." Again, no effort has been made to locate fraternities on Cal Poly's campus. It will never be "possible" because no effort is being made toward making it happen. Meanwhile, the residential neighborhoods are negatively affected every weekend by fraternity events, and residents are unable to sleep or have peace on their properties. Cal Poly continues to recruit more fraternities to its campus without any requirement that they have a legal fraternity location. There are currently 18 fraternities at Cal Poly. In the Fall of 2025, there will be 19 fraternities, and in the Fall of 2026, there will be 20 fraternities. Each has rush events, sorority exchanges, and other parties and events throughout the academic year in the City's neighborhoods. 319 The most recent General Plan, Land Use Element, adopted in 2014, says: 2.6.5: "The City shall work with Cal Poly to develop a proposal to locate fraternities on campus for consideration by the CSU Board. If locations on campus cannot be provided, fraternities and sororities should be limited to medium-high and high-density residential areas near campus." The City has made no effort to work with Cal Poly to develop a proposal to locate fraternities on campus for consideration by the CSU Board. I'm not sure if the City has the power to compel Cal Poly to build a Greek Row, but it does have the power to enforce fraternities' CUPs and place pressure on Cal Poly to stop ignoring the problem and take some responsibility for its fraternities. The university expects the City and its residents to absorb the negative impact of fraternity events in the City's residential neighborhoods, while it absolves itself of any accountability. Affected residents include college students who also need a quiet environment to study or sleep. Code Enforcement Presentation to Cal Poly's InterFraternity Council (IFC) The City informed Cal Poly's Greek Life staff and administration that it was illegal to hold fraternity-related events in R1 and R2 neighborhoods in late 2023. After Cal Poly published the AB 524 Report on the Greek Life webpage, Community Development and Code Enforcement notified Cal Poly about the City's laws and regulations for fraternities and sororities, and indicated that many fraternities were illegally holding events in R1 and R2 neighborhoods. On Saturday, January 11, 2025, before rush week, Code Enforcement staff, including Supervisor John Mezzapesa, gave a presentation at Cal Poly to Greek Life administration and staff, and the IFC, including fraternity members and potential new members. City staff explained that it is illegal for fraternities and sororities to hold events, including rush recruitment, in R1 and R2 neighborhoods. Six days later, on January 17, 2025, Delta Upsilon held a rush event at their illegal fraternity house at 388 Chaplin Lane, zoned R1. The fraternity posted a photo from its front deck at 388 Chaplin, looking down Fredericks Street, with the caption "Meet the DUdes from 3-5 today!" Our home is not far from this property, and my husband and I witnessed the rush event at 388 Chaplin on 1/17/2025. 320 Delta Upsilon knew it was not legal for them to hold fraternity events in the neighborhood, but did it anyway. They'd previously held many other rush events at 388 Chaplin Lane and other illegal fraternity houses in the neighborhood, and they have continued to hold parties and other events at those addresses, even though they know it is illegal to do so. Special Event Permits on Private Property and the Noise Ordinance There are no circumstances that would allow Delta Upsilon to hold a party or event at their fraternity house, as shown in their rush recruitment video, which supports the idea that fraternities should be located on Cal Poly's campus, away from residential areas. According to SLOMC 17.86.260, a "special event" permit may only be granted if the event poses zero potential to negatively affect the surrounding community. It is simply unrealistic to suggest that a large fraternity party, by its nature, could meet that standard. Additionally, per SLOMC 17.108.040, the Community Development Director may only approve such a permit if they can make specific findings, including that the event is consistent with, or enhances, the character of the neighborhood. This is an extremely high bar for a fraternity party, and in most cases, impossible to meet. At the October 2024 hearing regarding Lambda Chi Alpha's CUP, Community Development Director Tway emphasized to the City Council that there are no circumstances under which a fraternity may violate the City's 321 noise ordinance. As a reminder, that ordinance is enforcable 24/7 and prohibits any noise disturbance audible from 50 feet away. After 10 p.m. amplified sound is not allowed to cross residential property lines. A standard fraternity event, such as a sorority exchange, a "Big-Little" night, or any other typical party, would not qualify for a special event permit. These events routinely involve amplified music, shouting, chanting, and drinking games that are audible from more than a block away. They also result in intoxicated partygoers walking loudly through the neighborhood, disturbing the peace of residents. As someone who experiences these disruptions regularly, I cannot overstate how difficult it is to live with the constant noise, trespassing, and sleepless nights. These types of events are simply incompatible with a peaceful residential environment. For the well-being of our community, Cal Poly's fraternities must be relocated to a more appropriate setting, specifically on Cal Poly's campus, where they can operate without negatively impacting surrounding neighborhoods. I urge the Planning Commission to revoke Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 720 E. Foothill. The fraternity has consistently failed to comply with the conditions of the permit for several years. This academic year saw a rise in noise complaints to SLOPD, culminating in five citations within six months. Even after learning their CUP would be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission, fraternity members continued to host large, disruptive parties - this time at unpermitted locations - demonstrating ongoing disregard for the law and the surrounding community. These patterns of behavior suggest a lack of accountability and concern for neighborhood impacts. Revoking Delta Upsilon's CUP reinforces the integrity of the CUP process and ensures that all applicants are held to the same standards. Looking ahead, I believe this moment presents an opportunity for a broader, long-overdue conversation involving Cal Poly, the City, Greek Life, and surrounding neighborhoods. Greek organizations can offer meaningful experiences, but their activities must be compatible with the well-being of the larger community. The current model is not working. A sustainable path forward should include Cal Poly designating on-campus land for fraternity housing, where chapters can host events without disrupting residential neighborhoods. Many who are familiar with these ongoing issues see this as the most viable long-term solution. We can and should support the positive aspects of Greek Life while also insisting on compliance, respect, and accountability. This review process and revocation of a CUP when conditions are repeatedly violated is a necessary step in that direction. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kathie Walker 322 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 1:50 PM To:Chris Green Cc:CityClerk; Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: 1236 Monte Vista Place - Delta Chi- CUP Appeal Form & Payment Receipt Chris Green, Your appeal has been received and sent to the Community Development Department for action. For additional information regarding the process please contact Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development or Mallory Patino, Assistant Planner who are copied on this email. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 12:19 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: 1236 Monte Vista Place - Delta Chi- CUP Appeal Form & Payment Receipt Hello, On behalf of the Delta Chi Fraternity San Luis Obispo Chapter, I wish to appeal the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for 1236 Monte Vista Place. I have attached the written appeal form as well as our receipt of payment. Thank you for your time, -------------------------------------------------------- Chris Green President Delta Chi Fraternity California Polytechnic State University president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com ( 323 From:kathie walker < Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 1:30 PM To:Advisory Bodies Subject:Planning Commission, 6/25/2025 Item 4a Dear Chair Houghton and Planning Commissioners, Thank you for your time and dedication to addressing the complex issues surrounding Cal Poly’s fraternities. I appreciate your patience with the length of this correspondence. Some historical context is necessary to fully understand the scope of the situation. I remain hopeful that, through accountability and collaboration among Cal Poly, the City, Greek Life, and impacted neighborhoods, meaningful solutions can be achieved. How We Got Here: Community Development Department's Efforts There hasn't been oversight or regulation of Cal Poly's fraternities from the City for at least two decades. Community Development Director, Timmi Tway, and Code Enforcement Supervisor, John Mezzapesa, recognized the issue and started working on it shortly after Ms. Tway was hired as Community Development Director in late 2023. Code Enforcement sorted through the existing CUPs to identify which fraternities have CUPs and the conditions of each CUP. Code Enforcement proactively reviewed SLOPD's records and flagged the fraternities with flagrant violations of the conditions of their CUPs. Director Tway and John Mezzapesa deserve credit for beginning to tackle the problem that was historically ignored. That proactive approach has brought several fraternities forward for re-review of their CUPs to the Planning Commission. Most fraternity houses, including main chapter houses, are operating illegally in single-family neighborhoods, which helps illustrate the enormity of the problem that must be addressed. On October 1, 2023, the addresses of Cal Poly's operating fraternity houses were confirmed by Cal Poly's annual AB 524 Report, published online. That was the first year that State law mandated annual reports for Greek life at every college and university in California. The report requires each Greek organization to disclose the dates and locations of every event held during the previous academic year. San Luis Obispo Code Enforcement staff utilized the spreadsheets for Cal Poly's 18 fraternities to confirm over 60 illegal fraternity house locations, mostly in single-family ne ighborhoods, and sent notifications to the property owners beginning in March 2024. Some property owners contacted Cal Poly and/or the City about the notifications of illegal fraternity operations at their investment properties. This backlash led to Cal Poly editing the Reports in July 2024. They erased the addresses of every fraternity event and replaced them with "San Luis Obispo". Cal Poly's subsequent AB 524 Report, published on October 1, 2024, did not include the addresses for the fraternity events held in residential neighborhoods and listed "San Luis Obispo" as the locations. Code Enforcement sent a public records request to Cal Poly, asking for the addresses where registered fraternity events were held in San Luis Obispo, but Cal Poly refused to provide the list of addresses to the City. Therefore, it has been nearly impossible to cite the dozens of illegal fraternity operations in the City's neighborhoods that hold hundreds of parties and events during an academic year. In January 2025, the City Attorney indicated the City is working toward a long-term solution. SLOPD Noise Records for 720 E. Foothill Blvd 324 The Community Development Department has recommended a re-review of Delta Upsilon's Conditional Use Permit at 720 E. Foothill Blvd based on the number of violations of the conditions, including noise complaints to SLOPD, citations issued to the property, and events held by the fraternity that exceed the maximum 21 people allowed for any event or gatheirng in the current CUP. SLOPD's history for 720 E. Foothill Blvd for the past three academic years is below: There aren't complaints after the first week of June, or in July and August, when Cal Poly is not in session. Screenshots of each of the recent calls to SLOPD, after January 29, 2025, are included in this email. Notification from Code Enforcement to Delta Upsilon On January 29, 2025, Delta Upsilon was issued a Notice of Violation for the property at 720 E. Foothill Blvd. The Notice included some of the conditions of the fraternity's CUP and the history of violations, and says the use permit would be reviewed by Community Development for possible re-review by the Planning Commission. The Notice states: "Immediate compliance is required. These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated." After January 29, 720 E. Foothill Blvd had six more noise complaints, and three noise citations were issued to the property. One noise citation was appealed and dismissed because the Hearing Officer determined the noise was not "plainly audible noise 50 feet from the property line". This is the second time this month I have seen the Hearing Officer dismiss a fraternity's noise citation based on a misunderstanding of the City's noise ordinance. The noise ordinance prohibits any "noise disturbance" that is plainly audible "50 feet from the noisemaker", and not the property line. As an example, if someone is causing a noise disturbance in their backyard, and their backyard is 50 feet from another property, and the noise disturbance is plainly audible on another property 50 feet from the noisemaker, then it is a violation of the City's noise ordinance, 24/7. SLOPD has published information on their website here: https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/34766/638336680176730000 Here is the ordinance: 325 After 10 p.m., amplified noise is prohibited from crossing a residential property line. Using Delta Upsilon's property at 720 E. Foothill Blvd as an example, there is a courtyard in the center of the property with a beer dye table, shown in one of their rush videos. A screenshot is below: If people were yelling and making noise in that area, it could potentially cause a noise disturbance for neighboring residents 50 feet from the courtyard. It is not 50 feet from the property line, but it is still a violation of the noise ordinance. An aerial view shows Delta Upsilon's property, below. The white dashed lines are 50 feet long (from the potential noisemaker), the yellow dashed line shows the property line, and the red line shows the boundary 50 feet from the property line. You can see how a neighbor 50 feet away from a courtyard party could hear the noisy party, yet is not 50 feet from the property line. Still, it is a noise violation if it's a "noise disturbance" that can be heard 50 feet from the noisemaker. Otherwise, in the example below, the residents at 732 and 734 Foothill would never be entitled to peace because they are located inside the area that is 50 feet from the fraternity's property line. 326 On 2/6/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:05 p.m. for 'loud music and yelling' and was cleared as a negative violation. On 2/7/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 9:10 p.m. for a 'loud party at the location' and a citation was issued. On 2/7/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:30 p.m. for a 'loud party' and another citation was issued. 327 The fraternity likely appealed the earlier citation, called in at 9:10 p.m., because the noise ordinance prohibits amplified noise from crossing the property line after 10 p.m., and the Hearing Officer's (incorrect) interpretation of the noise ordinance is that noise before 10 p.m. must be plainly audible 50 feet from the property line. On 2/27/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 10:08 p.m. for a 'loud party', and a citation was issued that lists 65 people at the event. The fraternity knew that the CUP limited occupancy to 21 people for meetings and gatherings, because that information was included in the Notice of Violation that was sent a month earlier, on January 29. They hosted a party with at least 65 people anyway. On 2/28/2025, a complaint was called into SLOPD at 9:20 p.m. for 'loud music' and was cleared as a negative violation. On 3/15/2025, which was "St. Fratty's Day", a complaint was called into SLOPD that morning at 7:16 a.m. for a loud party. SLOPD arrived one hour later, at 8:15 a.m., and cleared the complaint as a negative violation. 328 Delta Upsilon posts videos during rush recruitment, which feature footage from their parties that feature their fraternity house at 720 E. Foothill and various parties: https://vimeo.com/1095113078?share=copy#t=0 The parties shown violate the conditions of the CUP for 720 E. Foothill Blvd, including the current limitation of 21 people for gatherings. Delta Upsilon also has illegal fraternity houses in R1 neighborhoods that operate as full-fledged fraternity houses. There was an increase in events at those locations in the past several months at 281 Albert Drive, 388 Chaplin Lane, and 1868 Loomis Street. I did not realize the CUP for the main chapter house at 720 E. Foothill was being considered for re-review, but now I understand why there was an uptick in parties at Delta Upsilon's illegal fraternity houses. Cal Poly requires events to be registered beforehand with the Greek Life administration; therefore, they have a list of the dates, addresses, and the number of people in attendance for each of Delta Upsilon's events. That list would confirm the increase in events at Delta Upsilon's illegal fraternity houses in the residential neighborhoods, away from 720 E. Foothill, to potentially avoid any more noise complaints at that location. Last month, on May 2, 2025, Delta Upsilon had an enormous party with a live band in the backyard of their illegal fraternity house at 281 Albert Drive. The video posted online says “Delta Upsilon presents The Kilians,” which is a band that played at the Shabang music festival the day after Delta Upsilon's backyard concert. The fraternity installed a tarp from the house to the side fence to hide the view of the backyard party. Delta Upsilon posted a video from the event on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJXia7Uh8kO/?img_index=1. If the link was removed, it can also be seen here: https://vimeo.com/1094575248?share=copy#t=0 329 SLOPD issued a noise citation to a member of Delta Upsilon for the party, and the citation says there were 50 people at the event. As you can see from the video, there were hundreds of people at the party. Officers don't go into the backyard or count people, and the number of people listed on a noise citation is provided by the person receiving the citation. Therefore, the number is often not an accurate reflection of the actual number of people at a noisy party. Delta Upsilon had another large, noisy event at 281 Albert Drive on May 16, 2025, and, again, installed a tarp to obscure the view into the backyard. On May 30, 2025, Delta Upsilon held a large, noisy party at 388 Chaplin Lane, on the corner of Fredericks St. It appeared to be a sorority exchange because many of the females were dressed alike, wearing the same colors. SLOPD issued a noise citation at around 11:00 p.m. with 100 people listed on the citation. The person who received the citation was Erik "Anders" Ruud, the former president of Delta Upsilon and Interfraternity Council President from January to December 2024. I spoke with Mr. Ruud on November 21, 2024, about parties at 281 Albert Dr and 388 Chaplin Ln, after a Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC) meeting. I serve as an alternative Representative for Geographical Neighborhoods and attend the monthly meetings. Unfortunately, he was dismissive toward me. He was also extremely rude to another Representative on the SCLC who has persistently brought up the "fraternity problem" during the monthly SCLC meetings, where Cal Poly has continued to ignore the issue. The general attitude from the fraternities seems to be that they are entitled to have noisy parties, despite any rules or regulations that restrict them. Cal Poly representatives make excuses or distance themselves from the problems faced by nearby neighborhoods. After Sigma Nu's and Delta Chi's CUPs were recently revoked (for fewer violations than Delta Upsilon), Cal Poly released the following statement to KSBY news: "Since an organization's permit is between them and the City, the University doesn't have any information to provide on that topic." While Cal Poly stays silent on the matter, it continues to recruit more fraternities to its campus without any provisions for their fraternity housing accommodations or concern about the adverse impact of its fraternities' parties and events on the San Luis Obispo community. CUP Limitations The current CUP for 720 E. Foothill Blvd allows 14 people to live on the premises and a maximum of 21 people on site for meetings and gatherings. The revised CUP allows 22 people for meetings and gatherings. This occupancy limitation for gatherings is fair and necessary, but has proven to be problematic for every fraternity CUP on file with the City because it is nearly impossible for a fraternity to hold an event and stay within these reasonable limitations. Most Cal Poly fraternities have over 150 members, and parties also include a large percentage of invited female guests. Fraternity parties are loud with amplified music that consistently violates the City's noise ordinance. The increased traffic and yelling while coming and going from fraternity parties add to the adversity of use. The most practical and viable solution to this ever-growing problem is for fraternities to be located on Cal Poly's campus, where they can have large gatherings without impacting residential neighborhoods San Luis Obispo General Plan and Cal Poly's Greek Life 330 The subject of fraternity houses has been included in the City's Housing Element since at least 1994. On 9/20/2024, Fraternities and Sororities were addressed as a "major area of concern" while the Housing Element was adopted, copied below. In 1994, there were a total of 17 sororities and fraternities, and 2,500 students belonged to Greek life. Now, in 2025, there are 28 sororities and fraternities (18 fraternities and 10 sororities) with about 4,500 members, or 20% of Cal Poly's student population. In 1994, the Housing Element, Section 1.28.10, said, "The City will work with Cal Poly University Administration to secure designation of on-campus fraternity/sorority living groups..." In 1997, the City's General Plan indicated there was a "Student housing study underway" concerning on- campus fraternities, which would be implemented "as resources are available." It appears those resources were never available. The City's General Plan, Housing Element, adopted on March 30, 2004, said: 331 8.2.6: "Locate fraternities and sororities on the Cal Poly University campus . Until that is possible, they should be located in Medium-High and High-Density residential zones near the campus." The wording has not changed, and the current Housing Element adopted in 2020 says the same thing: 8.5: "Locate fraternities and sororities on the Cal Poly University campus . Until that is possible, they should be located in Medium-High and High-Density residential zones near the campus." Again, no effort has been made to locate fraternities on Cal Poly's campus. It will never be "possible" because no effort is being made toward making it happen. Meanwhile, the residential neighborhoods are negatively affected every weekend by fraternity events, and residents are unable to sleep or have peace on their properties. Cal Poly continues to recruit more fraternities to its campus without any requirement that they have a legal fraternity location. There are currently 18 fraternities at Cal Poly. In the Fall of 2025, there will be 19 fraternities, and in the Fall of 2026, there will be 20 fraternities. Each has rush events, sorority exchanges, and other parties and events throughout the academic year in the City's neighborhoods. The most recent General Plan, Land Use Element, adopted in 2014, says: 2.6.5: "The City shall work with Cal Poly to develop a proposal to locate fraternities on campus for consideration by the CSU Board. If locations on campus cannot be provided, fraternities and sororities should be limited to medium-high and high-density residential areas near campus." The City has made no effort to work with Cal Poly to develop a proposal to locate fraternities on campus for consideration by the CSU Board. I'm not sure if the City has the power to compel Cal Poly to build a Greek Row, but it does have the power to enforce fraternities' CUPs and place pressure on Cal Poly to stop ignoring the problem and take some responsibility for its fraternities. The university expects the City and its residents to absorb the negative impact of fraternity events in the City's residential neighborhoods, while it absolves itself of any accountability. Affected residents include college students who also need a quiet environment to study or sleep. Code Enforcement Presentation to Cal Poly's InterFraternity Council (IFC) The City informed Cal Poly's Greek Life staff and administration that it was illegal to hold fraternity-related events in R1 and R2 neighborhoods in late 2023. After Cal Poly published the AB 524 Report on the Greek Life webpage, Community Development and Code Enforcement notified Cal Poly about the City's laws and regulations for fraternities and sororities, and indicated that many fraternities were illegally holding events in R1 and R2 neighborhoods. On Saturday, January 11, 2025, before rush week, Code Enforcement staff, including Supervisor John Mezzapesa, gave a presentation at Cal Poly to Greek Life administration and staff, and the IFC, including fraternity members and potential new members. City staff explained that it is illegal for fraternities and sororities to hold events, including rush recruitment, in R1 and R2 neighborhoods. Six days later, on January 17, 2025, Delta Upsilon held a rush event at their illegal fraternity house at 388 Chaplin Lane, zoned R1. The fraternity posted a photo from its front deck at 388 Chaplin, looking down Fredericks Street, with the caption "Meet the DUdes from 3-5 today!" Our home is not far from this property, and my husband and I witnessed the rush event at 388 Chaplin on 1/17/2025. 332 Delta Upsilon knew it was not legal for them to hold fraternity events in the neighborhood, but did it anyway. They'd previously held many other rush events at 388 Chaplin Lane and other illegal fraternity houses in the neighborhood, and they have continued to hold parties and other events at those addresses, even though they know it is illegal to do so. Special Event Permits on Private Property and the Noise Ordinance There are no circumstances that would allow Delta Upsilon to hold a party or event at their fraternity house, as shown in their rush recruitment video, which supports the idea that fraternities should be located on Cal Poly's campus, away from residential areas. According to SLOMC 17.86.260, a "special event" permit may only be granted if the event poses zero potential to negatively affect the surrounding community. It is simply unrealistic to suggest that a large fraternity party, by its nature, could meet that standard. Additionally, per SLOMC 17.108.040, the Community Development Director may only approve such a permit if they can make specific findings, including that the event is consistent with, or enhances, the character of the neighborhood. This is an extremely high bar for a fraternity party, and in most cases, impossible to meet. At the October 2024 hearing regarding Lambda Chi Alpha's CUP, Community Development Director Tway emphasized to the City Council that there are no circumstances under which a fraternity may violate the City's 333 noise ordinance. As a reminder, that ordinance is enforcable 24/7 and prohibits any noise disturbance audible from 50 feet away. After 10 p.m. amplified sound is not allowed to cross residential property lines. A standard fraternity event, such as a sorority exchange, a "Big-Little" night, or any other typical party, would not qualify for a special event permit. These events routinely involve amplified music, shouting, chanting, and drinking games that are audible from more than a block away. They also result in intoxicated partygoers walking loudly through the neighborhood, disturbing the peace of residents. As someone who experiences these disruptions regularly, I cannot overstate how difficult it is to live with the constant noise, trespassing, and sleepless nights. These types of events are simply incompatible with a peaceful residential environment. For the well-being of our community, Cal Poly's fraternities must be relocated to a more appropriate setting, specifically on Cal Poly's campus, where they can operate without negatively impacting surrounding neighborhoods. I urge the Planning Commission to revoke Delta Upsilon’s Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for 720 E. Foothill. The fraternity has consistently failed to comply with the conditions of the permit for several years. This academic year saw a rise in noise complaints to SLOPD, culminating in five citations within six months. Even after learning their CUP would be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission, fraternity members continued to host large, disruptive parties - this time at unpermitted locations - demonstrating ongoing disregard for the law and the surrounding community. These patterns of behavior suggest a lack of accountability and concern for neighborhood impacts. Revoking Delta Upsilon's CUP reinforces the integrity of the CUP process and ensures that all applicants are held to the same standards. Looking ahead, I believe this moment presents an opportunity for a broader, long-overdue conversation involving Cal Poly, the City, Greek Life, and surrounding neighborhoods. Greek organizations can offer meaningful experiences, but their activities must be compatible with the well-being of the larger community. The current model is not working. A sustainable path forward should include Cal Poly designating on-campus land for fraternity housing, where chapters can host events without disrupting residential neighborhoods. Many who are familiar with these ongoing issues see this as the most viable long-term solution. We can and should support the positive aspects of Greek Life while also insisting on compliance, respect, and accountability. This review process and revocation of a CUP when conditions are repeatedly violated is a necessary step in that direction. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kathie Walker 334 From:Purrington, Teresa Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 1:02 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Corey, Tyler; Patino, Mallory Cc:McDonald, Whitney; City_Attorney Subject:FW: 1236 Monte Vista Place - Delta Chi- CUP Appeal Form & Payment Receipt Attachments:CUP Appeal Reasons continued.pdf; CUP Appeal Payment Receipt - 1236 Monte Vista Place.pdf; City Council CUP Appeal Form - 1236 Monte Vista Place .pdf Appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke CUP for 1236 Monte Vista Place. From: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 12:19 PM To: CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Subject: 1236 Monte Vista Place - Delta Chi- CUP Appeal Form & Payment Receipt Hello, On behalf of the Delta Chi Fraternity San Luis Obispo Chapter, I wish to appeal the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for 1236 Monte Vista Place. I have attached the written appeal form as well as our receipt of payment. Thank you for your time, -------------------------------------------------------- Chris Green President Delta Chi Fraternity California Polytechnic State University president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com ( Date Received Revised and Published 10/01/24 Page 1 of 2 Filing Fee Applicant/Non-Applicant: $2,583.46 For Office Use Received by:_____ SECTION 2. SUBJECT OF APPEAL 1.In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or Title 17, Chapter 17.126 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, I hereby appeal the decision of the: _________________________________________________________________________ (Name of Officer, Committee or Commission decision being appealed) 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered: _______________________________ 3.The application or project was entitled: __________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ 4.I discussed the matter with the following City staff member: ______________________________________________________ on ______________________ (Staff Member’s Name and Department) (Date) 5.Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so, when was it heard and by whom: _________________________________________________________________________ SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what action/s you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages, if necessary. This form continues on the other side. APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________________ Name Mailing Address and Zip Code _____________________________________________________________________________ Phone Email _____________________________________________________________________________ Representative’s Name Mailing Address and Zip Code _____________________________________________________________________________ Title Phone Email Delta Chi Fraternity Chris Green President Planning Commission June 11, 2025 Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity (Delta Chi) at 1236 Monte Vista Place Mallory Patino, Community Development June 12, 2025 No 1236 Monte Vista Pl. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 1236 Monte Vista Pl. Unit 14, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com Revised and Published 10/01/24 Page 2 of 2 cc: City Attorney City Manager Department Head Advisory Body Chairperson Advisory Body Liaison City Clerk (original) SECTION 4. APPELLANT’S RESPONSIBILITY The San Luis Obispo City Council values public participation in local government and encourages all forms of citizen involvement. However, due to real costs associated with City Council consideration of an appeal, including public notification, all appeals pertaining to a planning application or project are subject to the following filing fee, which must accompany the appeal form: $2,583.46. Your right to exercise an appeal comes with certain responsibilities. If you file an appeal, please understand that it must be heard within 45 days from filing this form, except for matters arising under Title 17 (Zoning Regulations) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code shall be governed by those Chapters. You will be notified in writing of the exact date your appeal will be heard before the Council. You or your representative will be expected to attend the public hearing, and to be prepared to make your case. Your testimony is limited to 10 minutes. A continuance may be granted under certain and unusual circumstances. If you feel you need to request a continuance, you must submit your request in writing to the City Clerk. Please be advised that if your request for continuance is received after the appeal is noticed to the public, the Council may not be able to grant the request for continuance. Submitting a request for continuance does not guarantee that it will be granted; that action is at the discretion of the City Council. I hereby agree to appear and/or send a representative to appear on my behalf when said appeal is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council. __________________________________________________________________________ (Signature of Appellant) (Date) Reason for Appeal continued The Delta Chi fraternity respectfully appeals the Planning Commission’s revocation of its Conditional Use Permit U106-98 and requests that the City Council uphold this appeal. Please see attached documentation. as 6/20/2025 City of San Luis Obispo Finance 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7124 www.slocity.org Thank you for your payment. Have a nice day! Friday Jun 20 2025 10:52:57 AM Clerk - Misc Revenue (CLERKREV) JACK WERLE - APPEAL TO THE CITY C2,583.46 __________________________________________ Total 2,583.46 Credit 6926 2,583.46 Receipt #: finance-06202025-1 Cashier: Maryanna Espejo-Moses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VISA ************ Entry Method: MANUAL Date: 06/20/25 Time: 09:53:25 Reference: q-2ymZyjaCR96NpKRubdedKHxwlIM Auth Code: 055213 Approved - Thank You Merchant Id: CITYOSANL2GB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL USD $ 2,583.46 I AGREE TO PAY THE ABOVE AMOUNT ACCORDING TO THE CARD ISSUER AGREEMENT (MERCHANT AGREEMENT IF CREDIT VOUCHER) x_________________________________________ Cardholder Signature City Copy City of San Luis Obispo Finance 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7124 www.slocity.org Thank you for your payment. Have a nice day! Friday Jun 20 2025 10:52:57 AM Clerk - Misc Revenue (CLERKREV) JACK WERLE - APPEAL TO THE CITY C2,583.46 __________________________________________ Total 2,583.46 Credit 6926 2,583.46 Receipt #: finance-06202025-1 Cashier: Maryanna Espejo-Moses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VISA ************ Entry Method: MANUAL Date: 06/20/25 Time: 09:53:25 Reference: q-2ymZyjaCR96NpKRubdedKHxwlIM Auth Code: 055213 Approved - Thank You Merchant Id: CITYOSANL2GB Customer Copy RE: Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity (Delta Chi) at 1236 Monte Vista Place - June 20, 2025 CUP Appeal Reasons continued The Delta Chi fraternity respectfully appeals the Planning Commission’s revocation of its Conditional Use Permit U106-98 and requests that the City Council uphold this appeal. The fraternity believes that the revocation was premature and that issues cited can be effectively addressed through collaboration with City staff and other stakeholders. Rather than pursue a costly and time-consuming reapplication process, the fraternity proposes to work in good faith to amend the existing permit to ensure compliance and alignment with community expectations. Supporting documentation will be provided to the City Council that will demonstrate the willingness to remedy concerns and maintain a responsible presence in the neighborhood. 336 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 11:16 AM To:James, Dillon Cc:McDonald, Whitney Subject:CP attendees and agenda items Follow Up Flag:Flag for follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Dillon, Here’s a list of our attendees and proposed agenda items for the City/University lunch this coming Thursday. Please let me know if you need anything else on this! Cal Poly Attendees: Jen Haft, Chief of StaƯ Allison Baird-James, Senior Vice President, Administration & Finance Anthony Palazzo, Executive Director, Facilities Planning and Capital Projects Jessica Darin, Vice President, Strategic Initiatives and Advocacy Terrance Harris, Vice President, Student AƯairs and Strategic Enrollment Management George Hughes, Associate Vice President, Public Safety Courtney Kienow, Director, Community Relations and Economic Development Proposed Agenda Items: Budget update (city and university) – Allison/Whitney Housing and Infrastructure update –Allison/Anthony Maritime Integration – Jessica Fraternities/Conditional Use Permits/Grand Jury Report – Terrance/Courtney Summer/Fall Student AƯairs led activities (SLO Days, Wow, start of school, etc) – Terrance Saint Patrick’s Day Planning – Allison/Chief Scott Please let me know what items the City adds in case we need to prepare for a discussion on any of them. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 337 From:Webb, Donré Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 11:10 AM To:Espejo-Moses, Maryanna; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Cohen, Rachel; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you so much! Appreciate everyone’s help in this matter. Donré From: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 11:06 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Payment has been received, receipt attached. -Maryanna From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:28 AM To: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org>; Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you for clarifying Rachel! That is what’s posted on the City website, see the screenshot below. Please note, City Hall is locked on Friday’s – let me know if they will be submitting the appeal in person today. Thank you all for working on this! Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II 338 City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:05 AM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Rachel, You can give them my number below for payment. Thanks! Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:03 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you all for your assistance with this. I did want to clarify that the Fraternity does have until Monday to submit their appeal in case we are not able to process the payment today for some reason (decision was rendered on Wednesday, June 11 and we start counting starting on Thursday and the 10th day falls on Saturday, thus Monday becomes the 10th day). I will reach out to Jack to let him know they have to submit an appeal form with the payment. Who should Jack reach out to at the City to take a payment over the phone if they are ready to pay today? Cheers, 339 Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. 340 Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle 341 Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 342 From:Espejo-Moses, Maryanna Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 11:06 AM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Cohen, Rachel; Webb, Donré; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Attachments:finance-06202025-1, Jack Werle, $2583.46.pdf Hi all, Payment has been received, receipt attached. -Maryanna From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:28 AM To: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org>; Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you for clarifying Rachel! That is what’s posted on the City website, see the screenshot below. Please note, City Hall is locked on Friday’s – let me know if they will be submitting the appeal in person today. Thank you all for working on this! Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 343 From: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:05 AM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Rachel, You can give them my number below for payment. Thanks! Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:03 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you all for your assistance with this. I did want to clarify that the Fraternity does have until Monday to submit their appeal in case we are not able to process the payment today for some reason (decision was rendered on Wednesday, June 11 and we start counting starting on Thursday and the 10th day falls on Saturday, thus Monday becomes the 10th day). I will reach out to Jack to let him know they have to submit an appeal form with the payment. Who should Jack reach out to at the City to take a payment over the phone if they are ready to pay today? Cheers, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org 344 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III 345 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com City of San Luis 0bispo Finance 990 Pal!n St reet San Luis 0bispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7124 Nr,Jr,J. s l0c ity. rlrg Ihank you for your payment. Have a nice day I Friday JLln 20 2025 10:52:57 AH Clerk - llisc Revenue (CLERKREV) JACK I,JERLE - APPEAL TO THE CIIY 2,583,46 Total Credit 6926 2,583.46 2,583.46 Receipt #: f i nance - 06202025 - 1 Cash'ier : Maryanna Espejo-l!1oses VISA *********** Entry Method: l'lANUAL Date: 06/20/25 Time: 09:53:25 Reference: q-2yllrZ y iaCR96NpKRubded(Hxrv 1 Il'l Auth Code: 055213 Approved - Thank YoU Merchant Id: CITYOSANL2GB TOTAL USD $ 2,583,46 I AGREE TO PAY THE ABOVE AI1OUNT ACCORD]NG TO THE CARD ISSUTR AGREEI{ENT (I4ERCHANT AGREEl,{ENT ]F CRED]T VOUCHER) x 0rf Cardho lder Signature C ity Copy 346 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 10:28 AM To:Espejo-Moses, Maryanna; Cohen, Rachel; Webb, Donré; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you for clarifying Rachel! That is what’s posted on the City website, see the screenshot below. Please note, City Hall is locked on Friday’s – let me know if they will be submitting the appeal in person today. Thank you all for working on this! Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:05 AM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Rachel, You can give them my number below for payment. Thanks! Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst 347 Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:03 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you all for your assistance with this. I did want to clarify that the Fraternity does have until Monday to submit their appeal in case we are not able to process the payment today for some reason (decision was rendered on Wednesday, June 11 and we start counting starting on Thursday and the 10th day falls on Saturday, thus Monday becomes the 10th day). I will reach out to Jack to let him know they have to submit an appeal form with the payment. Who should Jack reach out to at the City to take a payment over the phone if they are ready to pay today? Cheers, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. 348 Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi 349 Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 350 From:Cohen, Rachel Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 10:09 AM To:Jack Werle Cc:Chris Green; Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Jack- Thank you for your email. Do you have a phone number I can reach you at today? We can take payment for an appeal, but we also need to receive the application for the appeal so we have something to attach your payment to. You can find the appeal form online here under “Appeal to the City Council”: https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/city-clerk/appeal-procedures-and-formsAlso I wanted to let you know that you have until the end of day (5pm) on Monday, June 23rd to submit your appeal and payment if for some reason you are unable to submit your appeal today. You can reach me at 805-781-7574. Thank you, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:46 PM To: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Rachel, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Our chapter's president for the upcoming year, Chris Green, brought it to my attention that we will be paying our CUP appeal fee over the phone. I attempted to reach Mallory to resolve the matter but understand that she is out of office until Tuesday. Please advise on if you are able to help with this matter or if there is someone else I can reach out to. If you are able to help process payments over the phone, I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment. Please let me know if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. 351 Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 352 From:Espejo-Moses, Maryanna Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 10:05 AM To:Cohen, Rachel; Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Webb, Donré; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Rachel, You can give them my number below for payment. Thanks! Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 10:03 AM To: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you all for your assistance with this. I did want to clarify that the Fraternity does have until Monday to submit their appeal in case we are not able to process the payment today for some reason (decision was rendered on Wednesday, June 11 and we start counting starting on Thursday and the 10th day falls on Saturday, thus Monday becomes the 10th day). I will reach out to Jack to let him know they have to submit an appeal form with the payment. Who should Jack reach out to at the City to take a payment over the phone if they are ready to pay today? Cheers, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 353 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III 354 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 355 From:Cohen, Rachel Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 10:03 AM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea; Webb, Donré; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna Cc:Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you all for your assistance with this. I did want to clarify that the Fraternity does have until Monday to submit their appeal in case we are not able to process the payment today for some reason (decision was rendered on Wednesday, June 11 and we start counting starting on Thursday and the 10th day falls on Saturday, thus Monday becomes the 10th day). I will reach out to Jack to let him know they have to submit an appeal form with the payment. Who should Jack reach out to at the City to take a payment over the phone if they are ready to pay today? Cheers, Rachel Cohen pronouns she/her/hers Principal Planner Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E rcohen@slocity.org T 805.781.7574 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration 356 E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM 357 To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 358 From:Webb, Donré Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 10:02 AM To:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Cc:Espejo-Moses, Maryanna; Koski, Patrick; Patino, Mallory; Cohen, Rachel; Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Thank you Andrea! Do you know if they submitted their paperwork? Maryanna and Patrick will be able to coordinate the payment, and then should the customer coordinate with your office? Thank you, Donré From: Colunga-Lopez, Andrea <AColunga@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org>; Koski, Patrick <pkoski@slocity.org>; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna <MEspejo@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, 359 I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. 360 Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 361 From:kathie walker < Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 9:56 AM To:Menesez, Marjorie Subject:726 Foothill Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Marjorie, Sorry to bother you again. I'm finishing up my report for the fraternity at 720 Foothill and realized the property has a second address of 726 Foothill. Do you have any records of calls to 726 Foothill from 9/1/2022 to the present? Thank you for your help. -Kathie 362 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 9:12 AM To:Webb, Donré; Patino, Mallory; CityClerk; Koski, Patrick; Espejo-Moses, Maryanna Cc:Cohen, Rachel; Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi all, Cc’ing Finance staff to confirm if they can take a payment over the phone as today is the deadline for the appeal to be submitted. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; CityClerk <CityClerk@slocity.org> Cc: Cohen, Rachel <rcohen@slocity.org>; Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III 363 Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 364 From:Webb, Donré Sent:Friday, June 20, 2025 8:59 AM To:Patino, Mallory; CityClerk Cc:Cohen, Rachel; Stowe, Lala Subject:RE: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi Mallory, I am cc’ing the Clerks office, being that this appeal will be to the City Council. Please let me know if there is anything I can do or coordinate. Thank you, Donré Donré Webb pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant III Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E DWebb@slocity.org T 805.781.7577 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To: Stowe, Lala <lstowe@slocity.org>; Webb, Donré <DWebb@slocity.org> Subject: Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi 365 Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 366 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Thursday, June 19, 2025 9:18 PM To:Stowe, Lala; Webb, Donré Subject:Fw: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Hi, if one of you are working tomorrow could you check with Rachel if they reached out and coordinate with her for taking their payment of the appeal. If Rachel is out, could you potentially coordinate with the clerks office or another planner that’s in. Thanks!! :) Get Outlook for iOS From: Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40:12 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Chris Green <president.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Subject: Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 367 From:Jack Werle <treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:40 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Chris Green Subject:Appeal Payment - CP Delta Chi Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Good evening Mallory, I hope this email finds you well. My name is Jack Werle and I am the treasurer of Cal Poly Delta Chi for this upcoming year. Chris and Jakob brought it to my attention that we will be paying our appeal fee over the phone. I am free between 1:30-3:30 pm tomorrow (6/20) to coordinate payment if any of those times work for you. Thank you for your help throughout this process and I look forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, Jack Werle Treasurer Delta Chi Fraternity Cal Poly San Luis Obispo treasurer.cpdeltachi@gmail.com 368 From:Wooten, Eric Sent:Thursday, June 19, 2025 3:16 PM To:Symens, Sadie; Holcomb, Kelly; Zion, Sarah Subject:Frat PRRs Here’s a list of the PRRs related to fraternities for the last 18 months. I’m linking out to the Clerk’s internal Laserfiche folders, as it contains produced records and correspondence. A good portion of these are related to St. Fratty’s. 2024 PRR24059 Walker - Noise calls for 348/350 Hathway & 1908 Loomis https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=189071 PRR24170 Walker - SLOPD calls for fraternity addresses https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=194704 PRR24179 Walker - Special event permits https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=195027 PRR24265 Walker - Fraternity correspondence/records 11/8/23 - present https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=199481 PRR24285 Walker - Noise calls at multiple properties https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=200078 PRR24328 Dittenber - Records Regarding Fraternities Jan 2022 to Current https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=201572 2025 PRR25089 Jones - St Fratty's Day Data https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=205905 PRR25095 Coetzee - Records relating to "No Park/Tow" signs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206125 PRR25098 Garza - St. Patty's Day and SEZ Information https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206242 PRR25099 Jones - St. Fratty's Enforcement Costs https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=206251 PRR25110 Shapiro - St. Fratty's Enforcement cost & recovery https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=207007 PRR25146 Hanson - St. Fratty's Day Data 2024 and 2025 https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=208601 PRR25162 Walker - Early Removal Program records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=209000 PRR25189 Luo - Delta Upsilon Use Permit Records https://slolf.slocity.org/laserfiche/Browse.aspx?repo=CityClerk#?id=210705 369 Eric Wooten Paralegal City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ewooten@slocity.org T 805.781.7139 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. 370 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Thursday, June 19, 2025 11:20 AM To:Amoroso, Brian Subject:RE: Unruly Gatherings Attachments:2024 UG.pdf 22, report attached. From: Amoroso, Brian <bamoroso@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 11:18 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: Unruly Gatherings Can you pull how many unruly gathering citations we wrote in 2024? Brian Amoroso Deputy Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E bamoroso@slocity.org T 805.594.8016 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 06/19/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 11:19 Master Citation Table Page: 1 CITATIONS BY LOCATION: Date of Citation Offense Code Street address ------------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------- 22:47:00 02/17/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 284 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 00:00:00 02/22/2024 SLMC9.13.060 284 FOOTHILL; GRID H-06 10:18:00 02/23/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 310 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 11:00:00 02/23/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 658 GRAVES; ZETA BETA TAU; GRID L-07 23:23:00 02/23/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 1218 BOND; GRID K-06 10:04:00 03/08/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 538 HATHWAY; GRID K-07 22:51:00 03/09/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 299 ALBERT; GRID L-06 07:53:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030B HATHWAY & BOND; GRID K-06 08:01:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 1216 BOND; GRID K-06 08:20:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 301 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 08:25:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 301 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 10:05:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 138 ORANGE; GRID K-06 10:25:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 281 ALBERT; GRID L-06 21:00:00 03/16/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 440 KENTUCKY; GRID K-06 07:33:00 03/18/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 306 HATHWAY; GRID K-06 22:51:00 05/17/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI; GRID K 00:00:00 05/23/2024 SLMC9.13.030 280 CALIFORNIA; ALPHA EPSILON PI; GRID K 21:38:00 05/23/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 1273 STAFFORD; GRID K-07 17:00:00 05/25/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 1327 FOOTHILL; BETA THETA PI FRAT; GRID 22:19:00 06/07/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 248 GRAND; GRID L-06 21:10:00 10/18/2024 SLMC9.13.030B 146 STENNER; GRID K-07 19:50:00 11/02/2024 SLMC9.13.030A 2074 LOOMIS; GRID L-06; GRID L-07 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 371 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 5:20 PM To:Terry Reeves Cc:Juan Fernandez; John Hatfield; Wade Spriggs Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Terry, The Planning Commission Staff Report and associated attachments are now published and accessible online. You can download the pdfs here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=0d341b53-47b3-4741-9491- b900ccf4c5d9&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English. I will be out of the office the rest of this week, but be back working on Monday afternoon. If you have any questions you’d like answers on before next week, please reach out to Rachel Cohen at rcohen@slocity.org. Otherwise, let me know if you have any questions or concerns before Wednesday morning. If you have a presentation you’d like to present, please send it to me before 3pm on Wednesday. You may submit agenda correspondence up until 3pm on Wednesday, see the City’s website for how to comment here: https://www.slocity.org/government/advisory- bodies/agendas-and-minutes/planning-commission. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Terry Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3:26 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Juan Fernandez < ; John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory. Thank you for the chat as well. It's fine to list me as the representative. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:16 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Terry and Juan, 372 Thanks for the chat earlier today. I wanted to let you know I found the Draft Resolutions that are going on consent to Planning Commission tomorrow night for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s revocations. You can access the drafts by clicking the paper clip icons on the item here: https://pub-slocity.escribemeetings.com/Meeting.aspx?Id=711b6ba9- e00c-4566-ab59-02a00d530d05&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English&Item=10&Tab=attachments . The language for my draft resolution will be similar to these, and if edits are made tomorrow night, my draft will likely reflect the final adopted Resolutions. One question regarding your review (USE-0334-2025), and sorry if you answered this already and I missed it – Would you like me to list Terry Reeves (Alumni Corporation President) as the representative on the agenda staff report? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:10 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill That would be perfect- thanks! Thanks, /juan 373 On Jun 5, 2025, at 14:08, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, We prefer to use our City Teams meetings. I can send you the link shortly. Would you like me to invite everyone who is on this email thread? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:06 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Invite sent for Tuesday at 11am. Do you prefer to send a SLO City Zoom or shall I set it up? Thanks, /juan 374 On Jun 5, 2025, at 13:58, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, I am available for a call or video meeting next Tuesday from 8:30am-2pm, or Wednesday from 8:30am-1 pm. Let me know if there is a time during those windows that would work for you. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006. png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: John Hatfield < ; Wade Spriggs < ; Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill Hi Mallory- Thank you for your proactive note with links. Can we schedule a debrief with you for early next week to discuss our June 25 CUP? I’ve viewed some of the video of the May 28 hearing and it would be good to get your input as we prepare our presentation to the Planning Commission. Can you please suggest a few times next week that we can meet? 375 /juan On Jun 3, 2025, at 16:29, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi John and Wade, I wanted to touch base on a few things regarding the upcoming USE- 0334-2025 Planning Commission (PC) hearing. 1. As the applicant, you will be allowed to speak for 10 minutes during the PC meeting on 6/25. Please let me now if you would like to utilize this speaking window, and if yes, who the speaker will be. 2. Who would you like me to list as the applicant representative? Previous fraternities have generally listed the sitting chapter president, but it’s up to you if you would like an alumni member, or if you’d like multiple names included. 3. The PC hearings for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu’s CUP re-reviews were held on 5/28. Though staff presented a recommendation to modify the CUP with revised conditions of approval, the Commission decided to revoke both fraternity’s use permits. The Resolution will not be adopted until the 6/11 PC meeting since staff did not prepare a draft Resolution for revocation ahead of the PC meeting. a. Based on this outcome straying from the other two more recent reviews (from late 2024), I will not be making a recommendation on behalf of staff for modification or revocation of the CUP for your re-review. I am still drafting the staff report, but it will present the project facts and list the alternatives PC may choose, which are 1. Modification of use permit with updated conditions of approval, 2. Revocation of use permit, or 3. Continuance of review to future PC meeting date. I will have two draft Resolutions ready as attachments to my staff report, one for 376 modification and one for revocation, in hopes that, based on their decision, PC will be able to adopt the Resolution the same night of the hearing. b. If you interested in reviewing the 5/28 PC meeting, the agenda, staff report, and minutes (no resolution yet though) can be found in these archives:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.asp x?id=26297&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk. c. You can watch the entirety of the 5/28 PC meeting here:https://www.youtube.com/live/avwDfoK3syU?si=0HU h_66DQiJAKQpp. From around 7 minutes to 1 hour, 45 minutes relates to the fraternity CUP re-reviews. If you have any questions about the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting, or your upcoming hearing, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: John Hatfield < Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:24 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Wade Spriggs < Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: USE-0334-2025 - Re-review and updates of Use Permit U 36-09, at 720 Foothill +Terry Reeves, incoming Alumni Corporation President Mallory, appreciate you sending this all over. It is very helpful. We were all finally able to line up our schedules and 6/25 works best for us. If we can put that date on the books, we'd appreciate it. Looking forward to being in SLO next month. 377 Thank you, John Hatfield On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:31 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Wade, My apologies for the delay in following up after our meeting. I set up the application for the re-review of your existing Conditional Use Permit to have a fraternity house at 720 Foothill (new application number: USE- 0334-2025). I have attached here a copy of your current use permit, which will be modified/updated through this re-review process. As I mentioned I would provide, below are links to two different fraternity use permit reviews that were recently processed.  Alpha Epsilon Pi, re-review of existing use permit o Staff Report for Planning Commission (PC) Meeting, agenda item 4a for re-review of existing use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=201304&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of modifications to existing use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=202053&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk  Lambda Chi Alpha, review of new use permit o Staff Report for PC Meeting, agenda item 4a for new use permit application:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/Browse.a spx?id=194681&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o PC Resolution, approval of use permit: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=195337&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o Staff Report for City Council (CC) Meeting, agenda item 6b for appeal of PC use permit approval: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.a spx?id=200405&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk o CC Resolution, upholding PC approval of use permit:https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/DocView.asp x?id=200865&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk 378 o Appellant presentation available in the CC 10-15-24 agenda folder: https://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink/browse.aspx? id=200395&dbid=0&repo=CityClerk The updates we will be recommending to the Planning Commission will be very similar to what was approved for AEPi and Lambda. I am moving forward with re-reviewing two other fraternity use permits at the 5/28 Planning Commission meeting. We discussed the possibility of reviewing your use permit at the same time as the others on 5/28, or by itself at the 6/11 Planning Commission meeting. If neither of those options work, 6/25 would be the next available date. Please let me know which review date would be best for you. If you would like to make it on the 5/28 meeting agenda, I would need to know asap. I will have a draft of the staff report and proposed resolution available for your review at least one week ahead of whichever date we schedule for the PC meeting. I may be in touch in the next few weeks if I have any questions while working on the staff report and resolution recommendation. Let me know if you have any questions for me! Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.pn g><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications -- John Hatfield ( 379 -- Terry 380 From: Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 4:05 PM To:Mezzapesa, John Cc:Salem, Rami; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Re: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA Thank you, John. I appreciate all of your research! The social media posts were on YikYak on Saturday, 6/7/2025, and did not list a specific address. Fraternities are required to register parties with Cal Poly beforehand, so the Greek Life office would have a record of the party on 6/7/2025 at 1292 Foothill. That's one of Sigma Nu's houses, which the fraternity members call "Lady Main," and there's a big sign attached to the house, above the entryway, that says "Lady Main." Several posts on YikYak said there was a conjoined dayge with SNU (Sigma Nu) and DChi (Delta Chi) on 6/7/2025. Screenshots of a couple of the posts are below: 381 I thought the posts were probably a joke because of the revocation of permits for Delta Chi and Sigma Nu. But it was very loud in our neighborhood on Saturday, June 7. I didn't call SLOPD for any parties that day. Someone called in the dayge at 1292 Foothill, and that's one of Sigma Nu's houses. I later saw that 1292 Foothill received a citation with 200 people listed, so it made sense that it was the dayge advertised on YikYak. Thank you for following up with the CUP information. I will update my records. - On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:04 AM Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> wrote: You are correct. Use permit 109-05 would never have been considered effective based on Condition #1. After some research, we have determined that the previously issued permits for 1290 Foothill (U0486-A) and 1292 Foothill (U 174-97) would have still been effective after the abandonment of the proposed development. Further investigation found that 1292 Foothill has not been formally used by a fraternity, nor does CalPoly have record of a recognized fraternity at the location since 2022. The use permit U 174-97 for 1292 Foothill is considered void for lack of use per SLOMC 17.110.090. I have created a request to investigate the reported event that took place on 6/7. We will need to determine that a fraternity sponsored event took place to move forward with a violation of an unpermitted fraternity. A preliminary search on the main social media platforms (Instagram, Facebook, etc.) do not seem to show an advertised event. Is there another social media platform you are seeing post on that we might be able to look into? Below is the current list of active CUPs. In addition to this list, 844 Upham is a known fraternity and, due to a previous determination in 2016 from the City’s Attorney’s Office, has been allowed to continue as such. The location has an old use permit from 1957 that predates the current zoning regulations relating to fraternities. I also removed 1716 Osos from the list because I believe is it void for lack of use as well. I have an email in to CalPoly to verify this. Permitted Fraternity Locations Use Permit # Address USE-0331-2023 1264 Foothill 1241 Monte Vista 1243 Monte Vista 1249 Monte Vista 1251 Monte Vista U0486-A 1290 Foothill U 799-79 1326 Higuera USE-0803-2019 1328 Foothill U 47-10 1335 Foothill 382 U 1292-87 1464 Foothill U 1440-89 180 California USE-3369-2016 190 Stenner U 314-71 244 California U 1099 280 California U 1048 615 Grand U 41-09 700 Grand U 36-09 720 Foothill John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 8:09 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Stewjenkins Info < Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < ; Brett Cross < ; Salem, Rami <RSalem@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA Based on the record, City's File Number U/GP-R/ ER 109-05 applies to 1290 - 1292 Foothill Blvd. and 123, 125, 137 & 175 Crandall Way only for the rezoning of the property from R-3 to R-4. It does not include a Conditional Use Permit for a Fraternity. The properties at 1290 Foothill and all addresses listed on Crandall Way do not have CUPs for a Sorority or a Fraternity. 383 The CUP for a Fraternity was approved for the property at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall, contingent on the demolition of the existing homes and redevelopment of the property. That demolition and redevelopment never happened. The City notified the applicant that the Planning Commission's approval expires after three years if construction has not started. The construction never started. The same house has occupied the property at 1292 Foothill for decades. Does this mean that the previous CUP #U-194-97, approved in 2008, applies to 1292 Foothill? I appreciate your help and getting all the records straight. -Kathie Walker City's Resolution to rezone all properties listed from R-3 to R-4: City's Resolution re: Environmental Impact of demolition/development of 3-story complex and CUP for Fraternity at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall Way: Letter from the City stating that approval expires in three years if construction has not started.: 384 On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 6:42 PM wrote: Hi Timmi and John, Updated List of CUPs John, you sent me a list of the current CUPs on file at the City about a year ago, on July 19, 2024. Would you please provide an updated list? CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi and Lambda Chi Alpha 385 Would you please provide the current CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi or Lambda Chi Alpha? I can't find a copy of the CUPs that were ultimately approved. CUP U-109-05 I wrote to you both on 2/17/2025 ("Questions about fraternity operations") for clarification on the CUP (U-109- 05) for 135, 137, 139 Crandall and 1290, 1292 Foothill because the record says the approval of the CUP was based on proposed improvements as a condition of use. The proposed improvements, including demolition and redevelopment of the property, never happened. Originally, a CUP for 1292 Foothill (U-194-97) for Lambda Chi Alpha was approved by the City Council on 3/17/1998. Before the approval of the CUP, the Simer "SLO Coast" Hostel was operating at 1292 Foothill, and Lambda Chi Alpha was located at 1617 Santa Rosa. The fraternity and the hostel swapped locations, allowing the hostel to occupy the 1617 Santa Rosa property while Lambda Chi Alpha occupied 1292 Foothill. The CUP allowed 10 people to live at 1292 Foothill, and a maximum of 20 people for meetings and gatherings. I've attached a copy of the CUP to this email. It seems the property representative, Kevin Hauber, started exploring the idea of demolishing the houses at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall Way in 2005 to redevelop the property. The City's file number for the project is 109-05, and "05" indicates the first application was made in 2005, but took some time before the final plans were brought to the ARC and PC. It was a large project that included rezoning several properties from R-3 to R- 4, demolishing the existing homes at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall, and replacing them with an 8,800 square foot, 29-bed fraternity house on the property. The three-story building included 16 bedrooms, an apartment for house parents, kitchen and dining facilities, an office, and a library. A rendering of the proposed new building from the Agenda Report is below. 386 According to the Planning Commission Agenda Report on 2/13/2008, when the demolition of the homes was proposed, the existing CUP only allowed 10 persons to reside at the house. This indicates the CUP #U-194-97, approved in 1998, was in effect when the hearing took place in 2008. Aside from the rezoning from R-3 to R-4 at 1290 Foothill, 135 Crandall, and 137 & 175 Crandall (which was a 1.4-acre site with a 20-unit apartment complex), none of the buildings at those addresses were affected by the CUP. On 2/13/2008, the Planning Commission approved CUP #109-05 for 1290 and 1292 Foothill Blvd, 123, 125, 137, and 175 Crandall Way, which included rezoning from R-3 to R-4 and redeveloping the property. The existing homes were never demolished, and the project was not completed. Condition 1 of the CUP says, "The use permit shall not be effective until after the associated site development has been completed consistent with the related Architectural Review Commission application ARC 109-05, and given final occupancy." The entire CUP is copied at the bottom of this email. It seems that Condition 1 was never met. That's why I wrote to you on 2/17/2025 and said that it appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, and asked if it was a valid CUP. Here is a portion of my email: "There is a CUP for 1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137 & 175 Crandall Way (#109-05). It was a supplement to the CUP for 1292 Foothill (#174-97) and was included in the report I gave you on 11/8/2023, which I have attached to this email on pages 28-32 of 95 pages. There have been noise calls for the addresses on Crandall Way but they do not show up in SLOPD's database as a fraternity. It appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, therefore perhaps that CUP is not valid but I'm not sure. Would you please let me know the status of those addresses? Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill and a sorority occupies 1290 Foothill, and I believe Sigma Nu also occupies the properties on Crandall Way. I'm just trying to get my records straight so would greatly appreciate some clarification about this. 387 John, you responded on 2/25/2025 and said: The CUP (109-05) is valid and encompasses all addresses listed on the permit (1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137, 175 Crandall). I've gone back and reviewed all the hearings for 1292 Foothill and cannot find any other hearings. The CUP you provided for the property at 1292 Foothill is based on the development of the property, which never happened. Here is a screenshot from the 2008 hearing, referencing the drawn-out development plans from 2005 (109- 05). I'm trying to keep accurate records and understand the Greek life issue. Will you please clarify the situation for the CUP at 1292 Foothill? Is the CUP valid even though the property was never developed? The CUP for the existing house, which was never demolished, was 10. The CUP currently used by the City allows 29 people, almost three times the original CUP, and matches the proposed 3-story house that had 29 beds for the fraternity. The current house is the same house that limited occupancy to 10, but the present CUP says 29, even though the house was never demolished and redeveloped. It doesn't make sense. What are the occupancy limitations at each property listed in the CUP? Alpha Phi, a sorority, occupies 1290 Foothill, Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill, and I'm not sure who occupies the addresses on Crandall. Does the City notify the sorority and fraternity of the terms of their CUPs? How does the City differentiate between the two separate organizations on such a large property, to include many addresses on Crandall Way and Foothill? 388 The reason the property at 1292 Foothill has come to my attention is that last weekend, there were multiple social media posts about a "conjoined dayge" held by Delta Chi and Sigma Nu on Saturday, June 7, 2025. The large dayge was at 1292 Foothill, and SLOPD listed 200 people at the party. (I did not call SLOPD.) Some of my neighbors have also said that 1292 Foothill is an ongoing problem with noisy fraternity parties. I've requested the SLOPD history for the property. Meanwhile, I want to sort out the CUP issue and confirm whether the CUP you have given me is actually valid, because the development was never completed. I have attached the record of the meeting to his email. Thank you for your help. I hope you have a nice weekend. 389 390 391 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 3:52 PM To:Dave Houghton Subject:PC Quarterly Report Attachments:3-2025 to 6-2025 PC report.doc Hi Dave, Please see the attached quarterly PC report that I will be sending over to the City Clerk. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Tyler Corey Deputy Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E tcorey@slocity.org T 805.781.7169 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO QUARTERLY REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: June 18, 2025 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairs of City Advisory Bodies CC: Teresa Purrington, City Clerk FROM: Dave Houghton, Chair ON BEHALF OF: David Houghton (Chair), Eric Tolle (Vice Chair), Justin Cooley, Juan Munoz-Morris, Steve Kahn, Robert Jorgensen, and Sheryl Flores. REGULAR MTG. DATE/TIME: Second and fourth Wednesday of every month at 6:00 p.m. STAFF LIAISON: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director of Community Development COUNCIL LIAISONS: Council Members Jan Marx and Michelle Shoresman MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS (MARCH 2025 - JUNE 2025):  Review and recommendation to the City Council of various amendments to the Airport Area Specific Plan to allow mixed-use residential development in the Service Commercial (C-S) and Manufacturing (M) zones subject to a Conditional Use Permit where appropriate and consistent with the County Airport Land Use Plan.  Review and recommendation to the City Council of a modification to a previously approved mixed-use development located at 600 Tank Farm Road, including a proposed modification to circulation improvements to install an unsignalized intersection at Tank Farm/Santa Fe (West) Intersection with stop control on the Santa Fe (West) as an interim access improvement in-lieu of the previously required Tank Farm/Santa Fe roundabout.  Review and recommendation to the City Council of various amendments to the cannabis regulations to clarify specific land use and operational requirements for commercial cannabis activity.  Re-review and revocation of a conditional use permit for an existing fraternity use located at 1236 Monte Vista Place.  Re-review and revocation of a conditional use permit for an existing fraternity use located at 1304 Foothill Boulevard and 190 Crandall way.  Review and approval of moderate development review, planned development amendment and conditional use permit to the allow the establishment of a private school (SLOCA) and daycare located at 3450 Broad street. Planning Commission Report Continued… UPCOMING PROJECTS (JULY 2025 – SEPTEMBER 2025):  Re-review of a conditional use permit for an existing fraternity use located at 720 Foothill Boulevard.  Review and recommendation to the City Council of the removal of a Planned Development Overlay for property located at 1144 Chorro Street. 392 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 1:47 PM To:Dickel, Jason Subject:FW: Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi Jason, I am the planner working on the re-review for the Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit for 720 Foothill. The use permit will be reviewed at the June 25th Planning Commission meeting at 6pm in the City Hall. We had a similar meeting about a month ago for the re-review of two other fraternity use permits, and Christine Wallace attended as Police representation. She did end up having to answer some questions from the Commission. Christine cannot make this upcoming meeting. She recommended I check with Fred Mickel, who also cannot attend and suggested you may be of some help. Are you available the meeting to attend as a representative for the Police Department? This is the only item on the agenda for that meeting, and we anticipate the meeting taking no more than an hour and some change. Let me know if you can attend, or if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mickel, Fred <fmickel@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 1:44 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi Mallory, Unfortunately, I am unavailable to attend that night. If needed, I am not sure who else from the police department would be of help. Maybe my Night Watch Lieutenant, Jason Dickel who was the one who ran the game plan for Saint Fratty’s Day. Fred Mickel Deputy Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 393 E fmickel@slocity.org T 805.594.8048 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 11:17 AM To: Mickel, Fred <fmickel@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi DC Mickel, I am the planner working on the re-review for the Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit for 720 Foothill. The use permit will be reviewed at the June 25th Planning Commission meeting at 6pm in the City Hall. We had a similar meeting about a month ago for the re-review of two other fraternity use permits, and Christine Wallace attended as Police representation. She did end up having to answer some questions from the Commission. Christine cannot make this upcoming meeting, and she recommended I check if you may be available to attend as a representative for the Police Department? This is the only item on the agenda for that meeting, and we anticipate the meeting taking no more than an hour and some change. Let me know if you can attend, and if not, if you have someone else from PD in mind that may be able to attend. Reach out if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 394 From:Mickel, Fred Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 1:44 PM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi Mallory, Unfortunately, I am unavailable to attend that night. If needed, I am not sure who else from the police department would be of help. Maybe my Night Watch Lieutenant, Jason Dickel who was the one who ran the game plan for Saint Fratty’s Day. Fred Mickel Deputy Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E fmickel@slocity.org T 805.594.8048 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 11:17 AM To: Mickel, Fred <fmickel@slocity.org> Subject: Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi DC Mickel, I am the planner working on the re-review for the Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit for 720 Foothill. The use permit will be reviewed at the June 25th Planning Commission meeting at 6pm in the City Hall. We had a similar meeting about a month ago for the re-review of two other fraternity use permits, and Christine Wallace attended as Police representation. She did end up having to answer some questions from the Commission. Christine cannot make this upcoming meeting, and she recommended I check if you may be available to attend as a representative for the Police Department? This is the only item on the agenda for that meeting, and we anticipate the meeting taking no more than an hour and some change. Let me know if you can attend, and if not, if you have someone else from PD in mind that may be able to attend. Reach out if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers 395 Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 396 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 11:17 AM To:Mickel, Fred Subject:Planning Commission 6/25 - Police representative requested Hi DC Mickel, I am the planner working on the re-review for the Delta Upsilon fraternity use permit for 720 Foothill. The use permit will be reviewed at the June 25th Planning Commission meeting at 6pm in the City Hall. We had a similar meeting about a month ago for the re-review of two other fraternity use permits, and Christine Wallace attended as Police representation. She did end up having to answer some questions from the Commission. Christine cannot make this upcoming meeting, and she recommended I check if you may be available to attend as a representative for the Police Department? This is the only item on the agenda for that meeting, and we anticipate the meeting taking no more than an hour and some change. Let me know if you can attend, and if not, if you have someone else from PD in mind that may be able to attend. Reach out if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 397 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 11:07 AM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi Mallory, I’m not sure. You’ll want to reach out to DC Mickel to inquire. Thanks, CW From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:50 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi Christine, Tyler and I are wondering if there is anyone else from PD that may be available to attend the meeting on 6/25 in case there are any questions better suited to your team? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:07 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I’m not available that evening. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:03 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The final re-review for a fraternity CUP, for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill Blvd. 398 Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:57 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations What is being discussed at the 6/25 meeting? From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. 399 From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations 400 Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner 401 Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 402 From:Patino, Mallory Sent:Wednesday, June 18, 2025 10:50 AM To:Wallace, Christine Subject:RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi Christine, Tyler and I are wondering if there is anyone else from PD that may be available to attend the meeting on 6/25 in case there are any questions better suited to your team? Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:07 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I’m not available that evening. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 9:03 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The final re-review for a fraternity CUP, for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill Blvd. Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 403 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:57 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations What is being discussed at the 6/25 meeting? From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:51 AM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Thanks for the info and catching that typo! I’ll update in the report. Will you be able to attend the 6/25 PC meeting coming up? Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:49 AM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Report attached of NSPY calls for service from September 2024 to current. NV means “negative violation” or no violation. Your PD Actions paragraph indicates September 2025. That hasn’t happened yet. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 8:12 AM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi again you two, I have one more follow up question: do we have a record of all the complaints/calls received for 720 Foothill from September 2024 to now? (Not just those that resulted in a citation). Or is the list I have complete with those as well? 404 I’ve included the language from the history of violations section of the staff report below. Let me know if any changes are needed. Police Department Actions Records indicate that the Police Department has issued five (5) citations for noise violations during the current Cal Poly academic calendar (September 2025 to present). Of these five, one (1) citation, issued on February 7, 2025, was successfully appealed. The citation was dismissed by Hearing Officer Alex Karlin based on a lack of plainly audible noise on the body camera footage of the issuing Officer at 50 feet from the property line. Code Enforcement Actions On January 29, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) / Notice of Violation (i.e., courtesy warning) due to multiple noise violations and Use Permit violations (Attachment X – Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 720 Foothill, dated 1-29-2025). Code Enforcement subsequently issued two Administrative Citations (assessing fines in follow up to the previous notice) for violations of the Use Permit on February 14 and March 19, 2025 (Attachment X – Administrative Citations for 720 Foothill, dated 2-14-2025 and 3-19-2025). After issuing the Notice of Violation and Administrative Citations, staff coordinated with the property owner and current fraternity members over the next several months to discuss these issues, including the referral for re-review by the Planning Commission. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 2:43 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I checked the citation appeal files and citation #28152, issued on 2/7 at 9:10 PM, was dismissed. From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Sorry, I can’t actually. That information needs to come from the City Attorney’s office. Please reach out to Sarah Zion. From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:21 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations I believe the first citation on 2/7 was dismissed on appeal. Christine can confirm. 405 Prior to recommendation for use permit review, Code Enforcement also issued two citations for use permit violations as a result of the noise citations. John From: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:59 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: RE: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations The citations listed below are all from noise, none for unruly gathering. No calls for service to the property since March. From: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 12:20 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Subject: USE-0334-2025, Delta Upsilon re-review history of violations Hi John and Christine, I’m working on finishing the draft staff report for the re-review of use permit U 36-09 for Delta Upsilon at 720 Foothill. Can you please confirm the number and type of violations 720 Foothill has received in this current school year (Sept 24 – present)? Here is the information I received as of April 1. Please note, this didn’t differentiate between a noise or unruly gathering violation. PD info Date of Citation/DAC DAC or CIT Notes 9/18/24 12:14 AM CIT 12 people 1/23/25 11:19 PM CIT 14 people, no alcohol 2/7/25 9:10 PM CIT 15 people, alcohol present 2/7/25 10:31 PM CIT 20 people, alcohol present 2/27/25 10:08 PM CIT 65 people, alcohol present Code Enforcement info: A Notice of Violation was issued to owner and occupants on 1/29/2025 for use permit violations, citing conditions #9 & #12 of current use permit. I’ll draft the language for the history of violations once I hear back from you two, and I will send to you both the language for a final review. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 406 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 411 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 11:04 AM To: Cc:Salem, Rami; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:RE: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA You are correct. Use permit 109-05 would never have been considered effective based on Condition #1. After some research, we have determined that the previously issued permits for 1290 Foothill (U0486-A) and 1292 Foothill (U 174-97) would have still been effective after the abandonment of the proposed development. Further investigation found that 1292 Foothill has not been formally used by a fraternity, nor does CalPoly have record of a recognized fraternity at the location since 2022. The use permit U 174-97 for 1292 Foothill is considered void for lack of use per SLOMC 17.110.090. I have created a request to investigate the reported event that took place on 6/7. We will need to determine that a fraternity sponsored event took place to move forward with a violation of an unpermitted fraternity. A preliminary search on the main social media platforms (Instagram, Facebook, etc.) do not seem to show an advertised event. Is there another social media platform you are seeing post on that we might be able to look into? Below is the current list of active CUPs. In addition to this list, 844 Upham is a known fraternity and, due to a previous determination in 2016 from the City’s Attorney’s Office, has been allowed to continue as such. The location has an old use permit from 1957 that predates the current zoning regulations relating to fraternities. I also removed 1716 Osos from the list because I believe is it void for lack of use as well. I have an email in to CalPoly to verify this. Permitted Fraternity Locations Use Permit # Address USE-0331-2023 1264 Foothill 1241 Monte Vista 1243 Monte Vista 1249 Monte Vista 1251 Monte Vista U0486-A 1290 Foothill U 799-79 1326 Higuera USE-0803-2019 1328 Foothill U 47-10 1335 Foothill U 1292-87 1464 Foothill U 1440-89 180 California USE-3369-2016 190 Stenner U 314-71 244 California U 1099 280 California U 1048 615 Grand U 41-09 700 Grand U 36-09 720 Foothill John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official 412 Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 8:09 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Stewjenkins Info <info@stewjenkins.com> Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < ; Brett Cross < ; Salem, Rami <RSalem@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA Based on the record, City's File Number U/GP-R/ ER 109-05 applies to 1290 - 1292 Foothill Blvd. and 123, 125, 137 & 175 Crandall Way only for the rezoning of the property from R-3 to R-4. It does not include a Conditional Use Permit for a Fraternity. The properties at 1290 Foothill and all addresses listed on Crandall Way do not have CUPs for a Sorority or a Fraternity. The CUP for a Fraternity was approved for the property at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall, contingent on the demolition of the existing homes and redevelopment of the property. That demolition and redevelopment never happened. The City notified the applicant that the Planning Commission's approval expires after three years if construction has not started. The construction never started. The same house has occupied the property at 1292 Foothill for decades. Does this mean that the previous CUP #U-194-97, approved in 2008, applies to 1292 Foothill? I appreciate your help and getting all the records straight. -Kathie Walker City's Resolution to rezone all properties listed from R-3 to R-4: 413 City's Resolution re: Environmental Impact of demolition/development of 3-story complex and CUP for Fraternity at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall Way: Letter from the City stating that approval expires in three years if construction has not started.: On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 6:42 PM wrote: Hi Timmi and John, Updated List of CUPs John, you sent me a list of the current CUPs on file at the City about a year ago, on July 19, 2024. Would you please provide an updated list? CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi and Lambda Chi Alpha 414 Would you please provide the current CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi or Lambda Chi Alpha? I can't find a copy of the CUPs that were ultimately approved. CUP U-109-05 I wrote to you both on 2/17/2025 ("Questions about fraternity operations") for clarification on the CUP (U-109- 05) for 135, 137, 139 Crandall and 1290, 1292 Foothill because the record says the approval of the CUP was based on proposed improvements as a condition of use. The proposed improvements, including demolition and redevelopment of the property, never happened. Originally, a CUP for 1292 Foothill (U-194-97) for Lambda Chi Alpha was approved by the City Council on 3/17/1998. Before the approval of the CUP, the Simer "SLO Coast" Hostel was operating at 1292 Foothill, and Lambda Chi Alpha was located at 1617 Santa Rosa. The fraternity and the hostel swapped locations, allowing the hostel to occupy the 1617 Santa Rosa property while Lambda Chi Alpha occupied 1292 Foothill. The CUP allowed 10 people to live at 1292 Foothill, and a maximum of 20 people for meetings and gatherings. I've attached a copy of the CUP to this email. It seems the property representative, Kevin Hauber, started exploring the idea of demolishing the houses at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall Way in 2005 to redevelop the property. The City's file number for the project is 109-05, and "05" indicates the first application was made in 2005, but took some time before the final plans were brought to the ARC and PC. It was a large project that included rezoning several properties from R-3 to R- 4, demolishing the existing homes at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall, and replacing them with an 8,800 square foot, 29-bed fraternity house on the property. The three-story building included 16 bedrooms, an apartment for house parents, kitchen and dining facilities, an office, and a library. A rendering of the proposed new building from the Agenda Report is below. According to the Planning Commission Agenda Report on 2/13/2008, when the demolition of the homes was proposed, the existing CUP only allowed 10 persons to reside at the house. This indicates the CUP #U-194-97, approved in 1998, was in effect when the hearing took place in 2008. 415 Aside from the rezoning from R-3 to R-4 at 1290 Foothill, 135 Crandall, and 137 & 175 Crandall (which was a 1.4-acre site with a 20-unit apartment complex), none of the buildings at those addresses were affected by the CUP. On 2/13/2008, the Planning Commission approved CUP #109-05 for 1290 and 1292 Foothill Blvd, 123, 125, 137, and 175 Crandall Way, which included rezoning from R-3 to R-4 and redeveloping the property. The existing homes were never demolished, and the project was not completed. Condition 1 of the CUP says, "The use permit shall not be effective until after the associated site development has been completed consistent with the related Architectural Review Commission application ARC 109-05, and given final occupancy." The entire CUP is copied at the bottom of this email. It seems that Condition 1 was never met. That's why I wrote to you on 2/17/2025 and said that it appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, and asked if it was a valid CUP. Here is a portion of my email: "There is a CUP for 1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137 & 175 Crandall Way (#109-05). It was a supplement to the CUP for 1292 Foothill (#174-97) and was included in the report I gave you on 11/8/2023, which I have attached to this email on pages 28-32 of 95 pages. There have been noise calls for the addresses on Crandall Way but they do not show up in SLOPD's database as a fraternity. It appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, therefore perhaps that CUP is not valid but I'm not sure. Would you please let me know the status of those addresses? Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill and a sorority occupies 1290 Foothill, and I believe Sigma Nu also occupies the properties on Crandall Way. I'm just trying to get my records straight so would greatly appreciate some clarification about this. John, you responded on 2/25/2025 and said: The CUP (109-05) is valid and encompasses all addresses listed on the permit (1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137, 175 Crandall). I've gone back and reviewed all the hearings for 1292 Foothill and cannot find any other hearings. The CUP you provided for the property at 1292 Foothill is based on the development of the property, which never happened. Here is a screenshot from the 2008 hearing, referencing the drawn-out development plans from 2005 (109-05). 416 I'm trying to keep accurate records and understand the Greek life issue. Will you please clarify the situation for the CUP at 1292 Foothill? Is the CUP valid even though the property was never developed? The CUP for the existing house, which was never demolished, was 10. The CUP currently used by the City allows 29 people, almost three times the original CUP, and matches the proposed 3-story house that had 29 beds for the fraternity. The current house is the same house that limited occupancy to 10, but the present CUP says 29, even though the house was never demolished and redeveloped. It doesn't make sense. What are the occupancy limitations at each property listed in the CUP? Alpha Phi, a sorority, occupies 1290 Foothill, Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill, and I'm not sure who occupies the addresses on Crandall. Does the City notify the sorority and fraternity of the terms of their CUPs? How does the City differentiate between the two separate organizations on such a large property, to include many addresses on Crandall Way and Foothill? The reason the property at 1292 Foothill has come to my attention is that last weekend, there were multiple social media posts about a "conjoined dayge" held by Delta Chi and Sigma Nu on Saturday, June 7, 2025. The large dayge was at 1292 Foothill, and SLOPD listed 200 people at the party. (I did not call SLOPD.) Some of my neighbors have also said that 1292 Foothill is an ongoing problem with noisy fraternity parties. I've requested the SLOPD history for the property. Meanwhile, I want to sort out the CUP issue and confirm whether the CUP you have given me is actually valid, because the development was never completed. I have attached the record of the meeting to his email. Thank you for your help. I hope you have a nice weekend. 417 418 419 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 10:28 AM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow; James, Dillon Cc:Collins, Scott Subject:RE: Greek Life Meeting Whoops! Thanks and sounds good. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:49 AM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting We were hoping for two meetings… Timmi and anyone else you think is relevant to the conversation is welcome. Thanks! Courtney From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 at 9:32 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>, James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Thanks, all. Let’s do the earlier date if possible. Can Timmi attend as well? Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, 420 It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola 421 We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 422 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 9:22 AM To:James, Dillon Cc:Hermann, Greg; Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Yes please – do you have a room we can meet in or should we reserve a room at Cal Poly? In addition to myself, can you please invite: Jo Campbell jcampb33@calpoly.edu; Joy M. Pedersen jmpeders@calpoly.edu; Jason Mockford jmockfor@calpoly.edu; Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola eaielloc@calpoly.edu Courtney From: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Cc: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>, Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… The linked image cannot be displayed. T… Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting 423 Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 424 425 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 8:52 AM To:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola Subject:RE: Quick question Thank you, Elizabeth. What about 1716 Osos? I know KKG was in there but moved out to go to 244 California. Do you know when they moved? Is there currently a recognized fraternity/sorority at this location? John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 12:33 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Quick question Hi John, We do not have any records of that address currently being connected to a fraternity/sorority! It used to be the old Lambda Chi House, but they haven’t been connected to that house since the owner sold it back in 2022 I believe. I am not sure who they ended up renting it to after they moved out. Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 12:22 PM 426 To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: Quick question Hi Elizabeth, I have a couple of questions I am hoping you have answers for… Does Cal Poly currently recognize any fraternity/sorority housed at 1292 Foothill? If not, when was the last time you recognized a fraternity or sorority at 1292 Foothill? Let me know what your records show. Thank you, John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official/ Code Enfocement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 427 From:Wallace, Christine Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 8:33 AM To:Juan Fernandez Cc:Terry Reeves Subject:RE: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 I’ve got pretty much all day open. How’s 10am? Can you also share with me what your role is with the fraternity? Are you an alum advisor? Best, Christine From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 9:41 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- I’m so sorry I missed the opportunity to meet today. Father’s day and work schedule blurred my view. Give the 30th is your next availability, I’d like to take that opportunity. As discussed, Delta Upsilon would like to be a lighthouse of collaboration with the City and SLOPD- can you please suggest what time you’d be available? Thank you, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 16:47, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Reports attached. I’m not available that week to meet. I have time on Monday, June 16 th or Monday, June 30th. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Right- I was suggesting we might meet at the Fraternity on the 26th after the Planning Commission meeting to discuss event management. Open to meeting in advance of the PC meeting as well. 428 Thanks again, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:44, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Yes, the noise statute is correct. I’m pretty sure the PC meeting is the 25th, not the 26th. I’m not able to attend that night but we can set up a time to meet a different time. I haven’t been inside the property, but I’ve been out front. I’ll have the reports to you shortly and I’ll provide September 2023 to current. Thanks, CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:38 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 SUPER appreciate the quick reply and advice. I was actually considering reaching out to RQN. As to “accurate", I mean are the noise statutes still accurate; it looks like the letter may have been written a while ago. I’m curious about the party registration- we can come back to that. I was only thinking this calendar year but I guess the more data, the better. Two years would be great. If you’re available to discuss event management on 26th, we can do it in person. Have you ever visited our Fraternity property? Thanks, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:28, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, 429 Happy to help. Before running reports, can you help me understand why you only need calendar year 2025? I typically provide data that includes either the academic year or at least two calendar years. SLOPD has party registration, but 720 Foothill hasn’t been eligible for it for a few years because of repeated noise violations. I’m not sure what you mean by “accurate” with regards to the RQN letter. If you are asking me if I think RQN is seeking to build relationships with fraternities, my answer is no. I strongly recommend you do not reach out to RQN at this time. We can discuss event management after your Planning Commission meeting. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 2:48 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- Terry and I are Exec board members of the Delta Upsilon Alumni organization working with Mallory to prepare for the Planning Commission meeting June 25. We’d like to request PD records information regarding our property in preparation. Can you please provide a list of any 2025 noise complaints for our property and two others as datapoints? Our property is: 720 Foothill Blvd Additional address request: 1127 Foothill 204 California FYI, Terry and I are reviewing the recommended amendments to the Fraternity Use Permit definition and as the longest continually recognized Fraternity at Cal Poly (70 years!) we’d like to be a lighthouse for open communication. I believe there have been recommendations to notify Code Enforcement prior to an event- does PD have a similar self-reporting process to notify prior to a planned event at our property? I’d also like to ask if the “Good Neighbor” letter posted by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods is accurate. We’d like to work with neighbor groups like RQN to align on the use of our property with reasonable neighborly expectations. Our Active fraternity members do try to limit noise and are open to coaching and notifying prior to planned events. Thank you in advance for your collaboration... /juan Juan Fernandez 430 From:SLO <noreply@user.govoutreach.com> Sent:Tuesday, June 17, 2025 8:26 AM To:Mezzapesa, John; Buckley, Nick; Green, Harriet; Salem, Rami Subject:Ask SLO Notification of new Land Use Violation Request #12197 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Request # 12197 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Rami Salem by John Mezzapesa. Request type: Problem Request area: Land Use Violation Citizen name: Description: Report of an unpermitted fraternity at 1292 Foothill holding an event occurring on 6/7/2025. Location: 1292 Foothill Blvd Expected Close Date: June 20, 2025 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 431 From:Juan Fernandez < Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 9:41 PM To:Wallace, Christine Cc:Terry Reeves Subject:Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Attachments:204CALIFORNIA.pdf; 1127FOOTHILL.pdf; 720FOOTHILL.pdf Hi Christine- I’m so sorry I missed the opportunity to meet today. Father’s day and work schedule blurred my view. Give the 30th is your next availability, I’d like to take that opportunity. As discussed, Delta Upsilon would like to be a lighthouse of collaboration with the City and SLOPD- can you please suggest what time you’d be available? Thank you, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 16:47, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Reports attached. I’m not available that week to meet. I have time on Monday, June 16 th or Monday, June 30th. CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:55 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Right- I was suggesting we might meet at the Fraternity on the 26th after the Planning Commission meeting to discuss event management. Open to meeting in advance of the PC meeting as well. Thanks again, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:44, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: 432 Yes, the noise statute is correct. I’m pretty sure the PC meeting is the 25th, not the 26th. I’m not able to attend that night but we can set up a time to meet a different time. I haven’t been inside the property, but I’ve been out front. I’ll have the reports to you shortly and I’ll provide September 2023 to current. Thanks, CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 3:38 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 SUPER appreciate the quick reply and advice. I was actually considering reaching out to RQN. As to “accurate", I mean are the noise statutes still accurate; it looks like the letter may have been written a while ago. I’m curious about the party registration- we can come back to that. I was only thinking this calendar year but I guess the more data, the better. Two years would be great. If you’re available to discuss event management on 26th, we can do it in person. Have you ever visited our Fraternity property? Thanks, /juan On Jun 13, 2025, at 15:28, Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Juan, Happy to help. Before running reports, can you help me understand why you only need calendar year 2025? I typically provide data that includes either the academic year or at least two calendar years. SLOPD has party registration, but 720 Foothill hasn’t been eligible for it for a few years because of repeated noise violations. I’m not sure what you mean by “accurate” with regards to the RQN letter. If you are asking me if I think RQN is seeking to build relationships with fraternities, my answer is no. I strongly recommend you do not reach out to RQN at this time. We can discuss event management after your Planning Commission meeting. 433 CW From: Juan Fernandez < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 2:48 PM To: Wallace, Christine <cwallace@slocity.org> Cc: Terry Reeves < ; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Wade Spriggs <ducalpolypresident@gmail.com> Subject: Info request - Planning Commission Meeting June 25 Hi Christine- Terry and I are Exec board members of the Delta Upsilon Alumni organization working with Mallory to prepare for the Planning Commission meeting June 25. We’d like to request PD records information regarding our property in preparation. Can you please provide a list of any 2025 noise complaints for our property and two others as datapoints? Our property is: 720 Foothill Blvd Additional address request: 1127 Foothill 204 California FYI, Terry and I are reviewing the recommended amendments to the Fraternity Use Permit definition and as the longest continually recognized Fraternity at Cal Poly (70 years!) we’d like to be a lighthouse for open communication. I believe there have been recommendations to notify Code Enforcement prior to an event- does PD have a similar self-reporting process to notify prior to a planned event at our property? I’d also like to ask if the “Good Neighbor” letter posted by Residents for Quality Neighborhoods is accurate. We’d like to work with neighbor groups like RQN to align on the use of our property with reasonable neighborly expectations. Our Active fraternity members do try to limit noise and are open to coaching and notifying prior to planned events. Thank you in advance for your collaboration... /juan Juan Fernandez 06/13/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 16:44 NSPY Clearance Data Page: 1 NSPY OFF/LOC/CLEARANCE: Incident address When reported Responsible off Cle Offe ------------------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ---- 204 CALIFORNIA # C1; GRID 23:38:18 11/06/2023 Ye, Jeremy DAC NSPY = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 06/13/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 16:41 NSPY Clearance Data Page: 1 NSPY OFF/LOC/CLEARANCE: Incident address When reported Responsible off Cle Offe ------------------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ---- 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 23:13:49 10/11/2023 Swartz, C NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:15:38 10/18/2023 Etherton, B CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 23:45:22 12/02/2023 Johanson, T CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 21:23:32 02/01/2024 Ares, J NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:19:03 05/01/2024 Mangskau, N NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 23:05:26 06/07/2024 Crawford, C NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 00:14:25 09/18/2024 Jessen, S CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:00:28 11/15/2024 Brewer, D NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 00:37:14 01/18/2025 Cordell, A NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 23:19:25 01/23/2025 Bracy, B CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 21:10:45 02/07/2025 Meggs, N CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:31:44 02/07/2025 Meggs, N CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 22:08:22 02/27/2025 Cordell, A CIT NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 21:20:29 02/28/2025 Ayres, A NV NSPY 720 FOOTHILL; DELTA UPSIL 07:16:39 03/15/2025 Ybarra, F NV NSPY = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 06/13/25 San Luis Obispo Police Department 919 16:43 NSPY Clearance Data Page: 1 NSPY OFF/LOC/CLEARANCE: Incident address When reported Responsible off Cle Offe ------------------------- ------------------- --------------- --- ---- 1127 FOOTHILL # 203; GRID 23:16:31 02/23/2024 Fernandez, J DAC NSPY 1127 FOOTHILL # 204 00:57:24 12/06/2024 Ladow, D NV NSPY 1127 FOOTHILL # 107 23:51:36 02/22/2025 Dahmen, I DAC NSPY 1127 FOOTHILL # 109; AREA 23:13:35 05/03/2025 Dahmen, I NV NSPY = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 434 From:James, Dillon Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 5:38 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Cc:Hermann, Greg; Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Greek Life Meeting Hi all, It may take a bit of reshuffling of some internal meetings, but as of right now, it looks like everyone on this thread should be able to make the following two options:  July 16th, 2:00-3:00pm  July 31st, 10:00-11:00am Let me know if I should hold both of these times for everyone. Thank you! Dillon James pronouns he/him/his Administration Executive Assistant City Administration 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E djames@slocity.org T 805.781.7123 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 5:28 PM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Cc: James, Dillon <djames@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM 435 To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely different topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staff on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 436 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 5:29 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow; Collins, Scott Cc:James, Dillon Subject:RE: Greek Life Meeting Hi Courtney, Thanks for reaching out and my apologies for the delay. I just needed to connect with folks on the City side. The meeting should include Whitney, Scott, Timmi and myself. I’m looping in Dylan from our team to compare schedules and get something on calendars. Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:02 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Greek Life Meeting Hi Greg, Thank you for the brainstorm earlier on next steps in partnership around fraternities and sororities in our neighborhoods and CUPs. I know I took advantage of a call on a completely diƯerent topic! 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Looping in Scott since CDD is one of his departments. I’d like to set up two meetings over the summer where staƯ on this issue from both institutions can come together and continue the conversation about creative solutions/ideas. These have been the participants in these meetings in the past on our end: Courtney Kienow Jo Campbell Joy Pedersen – new to meetings Jason Mockford Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola We are all available on the following dates/times: June 18th 8:30-9:45 July 16th 2-3pm July 23rd 9-10:15am July 31st 10-11am August 6th 9-11am I know Scott attended the last one and you’ve attended some of the ones in the past. Please let me know if two of these options can work for the appropriate members of your team. Warmly, Courtney 437 Courtney Kienow pronouns she/hers (why is this important?) Director of Community Relations and Economic Development Office of the President Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 438 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 12:46 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Salem, Rami Subject:RE: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA Attachments:1290 Foothill (Alpha Phi) Use Permit.pdf; 1292 Foothill Use Permit.pdf 1290 Foothill is an active Sorority recognized by Cal Poly. Do you want me to respond to Kathie? John From: kathie walker < Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 6:42 PM To: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org>; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Stewjenkins Info < Cc: Sandra Rowley < ; Carolyn Smith < ; Brett Cross < ; Salem, Rami <RSalem@slocity.org> Subject: 1292 Foothill, Current list of CUP addresses, CUPs for AEPi & LCA Hi Timmi and John, Updated List of CUPs John, you sent me a list of the current CUPs on file at the City about a year ago, on July 19, 2024. Would you please provide an updated list? CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi and Lambda Chi Alpha Would you please provide the current CUPs for Alpha Epsilon Pi or Lambda Chi Alpha? I can't find a copy of the CUPs that were ultimately approved. CUP U-109-05 I wrote to you both on 2/17/2025 ("Questions about fraternity operations") for clarification on the CUP (U-109- 05) for 135, 137, 139 Crandall and 1290, 1292 Foothill because the record says the approval of the CUP was based on proposed improvements as a condition of use. The proposed improvements, including demolition and redevelopment of the property, never happened. 439 Originally, a CUP for 1292 Foothill (U-194-97) for Lambda Chi Alpha was approved by the City Council on 3/17/1998. Before the approval of the CUP, the Simer "SLO Coast" Hostel was operating at 1292 Foothill, and Lambda Chi Alpha was located at 1617 Santa Rosa. The fraternity and the hostel swapped locations, allowing the hostel to occupy the 1617 Santa Rosa property while Lambda Chi Alpha occupied 1292 Foothill. The CUP allowed 10 people to live at 1292 Foothill, and a maximum of 20 people for meetings and gatherings. I've attached a copy of the CUP to this email. It seems the property representative, Kevin Hauber, started exploring the idea of demolishing the houses at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall Way in 2005 to redevelop the property. The City's file number for the project is 109-05, and "05" indicates the first application was made in 2005, but took some time before the final plans were brought to the ARC and PC. It was a large project that included rezoning several properties from R-3 to R-4, demolishing the existing homes at 1292 Foothill and 123 Crandall, and replacing them with an 8,800 square foot, 29-bed fraternity house on the property. The three-story building included 16 bedrooms, an apartment for house parents, kitchen and dining facilities, an office, and a library. A rendering of the proposed new building from the Agenda Report is below. According to the Planning Commission Agenda Report on 2/13/2008, when the demolition of the homes was proposed, the existing CUP only allowed 10 persons to reside at the house. This indicates the CUP #U-194-97, approved in 1998, was in effect when the hearing took place in 2008. Aside from the rezoning from R-3 to R-4 at 1290 Foothill, 135 Crandall, and 137 & 175 Crandall (which was a 1.4- acre site with a 20-unit apartment complex), none of the buildings at those addresses were affected by the CUP. 440 On 2/13/2008, the Planning Commission approved CUP #109-05 for 1290 and 1292 Foothill Blvd, 123, 125, 137, and 175 Crandall Way, which included rezoning from R-3 to R-4 and redeveloping the property. The existing homes were never demolished, and the project was not completed. Condition 1 of the CUP says, "The use permit shall not be effective until after the associated site development has been completed consistent with the related Architectural Review Commission application ARC 109-05, and given final occupancy." The entire CUP is copied at the bottom of this email. It seems that Condition 1 was never met. That's why I wrote to you on 2/17/2025 and said that it appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, and asked if it was a valid CUP. Here is a portion of my email: "There is a CUP for 1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137 & 175 Crandall Way (#109-05). It was a supplement to the CUP for 1292 Foothill (#174-97) and was included in the report I gave you on 11/8/2023, which I have attached to this email on pages 28-32 of 95 pages. There have been noise calls for the addresses on Crandall Way but they do not show up in SLOPD's database as a fraternity. It appears the terms of the CUP were never fulfilled, therefore perhaps that CUP is not valid but I'm not sure. Would you please let me know the status of those addresses? Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill and a sorority occupies 1290 Foothill, and I believe Sigma Nu also occupies the properties on Crandall Way. I'm just trying to get my records straight so would greatly appreciate some clarification about this. John, you responded on 2/25/2025 and said: The CUP (109-05) is valid and encompasses all addresses listed on the permit (1290 & 1292 Foothill, 123, 135, 137, 175 Crandall). I've gone back and reviewed all the hearings for 1292 Foothill and cannot find any other hearings. The CUP you provided for the property at 1292 Foothill is based on the development of the property, which never happened. Here is a screenshot from the 2008 hearing, referencing the drawn-out development plans from 2005 (109-05). I'm trying to keep accurate records and understand the Greek life issue. Will you please clarify the situation for the CUP at 1292 Foothill? Is the CUP valid even though the property was never developed? The CUP for the 441 existing house, which was never demolished, was 10. The CUP currently used by the City allows 29 people, almost three times the original CUP, and matches the proposed 3-story house that had 29 beds for the fraternity. The current house is the same house that limited occupancy to 10, but the present CUP says 29, even though the house was never demolished and redeveloped. It doesn't make sense. What are the occupancy limitations at each property listed in the CUP? Alpha Phi, a sorority, occupies 1290 Foothill, Sigma Nu occupies 1292 Foothill, and I'm not sure who occupies the addresses on Crandall. Does the City notify the sorority and fraternity of the terms of their CUPs? How does the City differentiate between the two separate organizations on such a large property, to include many addresses on Crandall Way and Foothill? The reason the property at 1292 Foothill has come to my attention is that last weekend, there were multiple social media posts about a "conjoined dayge" held by Delta Chi and Sigma Nu on Saturday, June 7, 2025. The large dayge was at 1292 Foothill, and SLOPD listed 200 people at the party. (I did not call SLOPD.) Some of my neighbors have also said that 1292 Foothill is an ongoing problem with noisy fraternity parties. I've requested the SLOPD history for the property. Meanwhile, I want to sort out the CUP issue and confirm whether the CUP you have given me is actually valid, because the development was never completed. I have attached the record of the meeting to his email. Thank you for your help. I hope you have a nice weekend. Kathie 442 443 From:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 12:33 PM To:Mezzapesa, John Subject:Re: Quick question Hi John, We do not have any records of that address currently being connected to a fraternity/sorority! It used to be the old Lambda Chi House, but they haven’t been connected to that house since the owner sold it back in 2022 I believe. I am not sure who they ended up renting it to after they moved out. Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me From: Mezzapesa, John <JMezzape@slocity.org> Date: Monday, June 16, 2025 at 12:22 PM To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: Quick question Hi Elizabeth, I have a couple of questions I am hoping you have answers for… Does Cal Poly currently recognize any fraternity/sorority housed at 1292 Foothill? If not, when was the last time you recognized a fraternity or sorority at 1292 Foothill? Let me know what your records show. Thank you, John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official/ Code Enfocement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 444 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 445 From:Mezzapesa, John Sent:Monday, June 16, 2025 12:22 PM To:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola Subject:Quick question Hi Elizabeth, I have a couple of questions I am hoping you have answers for… Does Cal Poly currently recognize any fraternity/sorority housed at 1292 Foothill? If not, when was the last time you recognized a fraternity or sorority at 1292 Foothill? Let me know what your records show. Thank you, John Mezzapesa Interim Deputy Building Official/ Code Enfocement Supervisor Community Development Building and Safety 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E jmezzapesa@slocity.org T 805.781.7179 447 On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 3:53 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hello, Last night (June 11, 2025), following the Public Hearing on May 28, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC-1102-2025, revoking the Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity (Delta Chi) at 1236 Monte Vista Place. A copy of the Resolution is attached here. This Resolution (decision) may be appealed to the City Council. To appeal, you must complete and file the Appeal to the City Council form with the City Clerk’s Office within 10 calendar days of this written rendered decision (by end of business day, Monday June 23, because day 10 is on a weekend). The required filing fee ($2,583.46) must accompany the appeal form. You can pay the appeal fee at the Finance Counter, which is temporarily located at 919 Palm Street, in person from Monday-Thursday, 8am-4pm. If you need to pay over the phone, you can let me know and I’ll coordinate phone payment. Information about the appeal procedures is on the City's Website here (refer to the ‘Appeal to the City Council’ section). If you would like to pursue applying for a new Conditional Use Permit, I have attached here the application checklist of items required to apply (note: physical copies of plans are no longer required). You can apply via email by submitting the application materials to planning@slocity.org. Upon submittal of an application, Planning staff will set up an application and send you an invoice for the required application filing fee ($10,932.57). The invoice will be sent with instructions on how to pay online. If you prefer to apply and pay in person, let me know and I can provide details for days and times when our Planning counter is open to the public. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:Genevieve Czech < Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:42 AM To:E-mail Council Website Subject:Item 8a of meeting by City Council on 07/15/25 Dear Lady Mayoress and City Council: The correspondence you have received already is sufficient for you to both study and assimilate the serious concerns of SLO city residents, long standing and productive residents whose concerns deserve your humble and earnest consideration. Among some of those issues raised are the failure by Cal Poly to release the addresses of satellite fraternities and sororities. In effect they violate our zoning codes. One suggestion that has been made is for Cal Poly to provide Greek houses on campus as is the practice of most Universities. Another recommendation is for the owners/landlords of student housing to enforce the rental agreements, imposing fines for students holding loud and overcrowded parties beyond the curfew, evern becoming excessively loud before the curfew when the party starts in early afternoon. Registering parties has not been a suitable strategy as the Police tend to ignore noise complaints once the party would have been registered. Registering implies a permit to abuse any noise ordinance in a residential neighborhood. One correspondent has made the considerable effort to log the history of the problems, including the SCLC committee's initial founding/purpose/composition and limitations, including making the minutes of their meetings available to the public. I do indeed support former Mayor Jan Marx's inclusion on that committee to enable the full understanding of the history and successes and failures of neighborhood wellness in current and future discussion. Two decades ago Cal Poly made some efforts to participate in reducing the town/gown issues in building more campus housing, in having students view a video of their responsibilities when living in residential neighborhoods. Their declared intention of having not only Freshmen and Sophomores live on campus, but gradually even the Juniors and Seniors is not consonant with their objective of increased growth. Further, it denies the adult students the opportunity to live together in harmony and experience and establish home management. Our street which has over 50% student rental housing has witnessed some very good examples of responsible student tenancy, while other examples of insensitive behavior regarding the longtime residents. In such cases we have been compelled to intervene personally after suffering the disturbance, or reporting the violation beyond curfew. 'Tis true that the Police have not always been responsive, or sufficiently punitive when they have intervened. The earlier practice of "good renter certificates" was apparently stopped due to claims of discrimination of student tenants, which is unfounded, as landlords have the right to even evict tenants who violate the rental agreement. You were invited before the grand jury report was published to visit neighborhoods to witness firsthand the disruption satellite fraternities caused to a residential neighborhood. Apparently, no members of the Council accepted the invitation to actually experience the problem. The effort the grand jury report represents cannot be dismissed as NIMBY whining, but more than justified concerns and issues by the SLO residents who wish to preserve gracious and respectful community living in SLO with the full support of the City staff elected by them, and the interaction of Cal Poly whose declared aim is to teach learning by doing, including responsible citizenship in the community. May you reflect on all the issues raised in your correspondence with a sincere and resolved discussion and action to model a town who works with gown and landlords to ensure more harmony and mutual respect. Yours sincerely, Genevieve Czech, 2 3 From: Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:34 AM To:E-mail Council Website Cc:'RQN of SLO' Subject:Grand Jury Report Dear Mayor Stewart and City Council. I lived with my family for 44 years on Albert Drive (Alta Vista Neighborhood one block from Cal Poly)…1978-2002. While the noise and parties; and general lack of respect by the encroaching short -term students towards the long-term residents escalated during that time, there are two specific issues that drove our family from our “forever home” to the south side of town. 1. With the overcrowding by students in the other houses on Albert Dr., there was also a huge increase in numbers of cars parking on the streets…as many students were living in converted garages; and the visitors to the neighborhood took up more spots...thus causing un -safe driving conditions. 2. One night there was a party in the house across from our house (in the house once occupied by my parents, Wes and Doty Conner). The party overflowed from the house into the street, and I went outside to ask the partiers to take it back inside. One of the non-resident partiers threatened to “beat” me up and to mind my own business !!! Good-bye Albert Drive! This was an extremely emotional experience, as I had lived in the “party house” in the ‘60 Õs while a student at San Luis Obispo High School and first year Poly student. The City and CP Administration need to come to grips with getting the bulk of their students (not just the FratÕs and Sororities) on Campus. Sincerely, Terry W. Conner Dream Big, Pursue Your Dreams 4 From:Shoresman, Michelle Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 10:33 AM To:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre Subject:Re: July 15 - 2025; Item 8a Thanks for the email Mila. As you know, the item tonight is to create an ad hoc committee so that the council can legally respond to certain findings in the grand jury report, as we are legally required to do. I think we have made lots of progress already, both on St Patrick’s day, and the surrounding events, but also on the other neighborhood issues noted in the report. But, of course, there is still work to do. Most of the letters we have gotten also mention Cal Poly’s role in this and I appreciate those mentions. They are a key player in this as well. Thanks again for the letter. As this issue is now part of our major city goals, this is not the first, nor the last discussion on this, for sure. Michelle From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:40:15 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: July 15 - 2025; Item 8a July 15, 2025 Agenda Item: 8a Dear Mayor Stewart and Council Members: As a local teacher who has taught in the San Luis Coastal Unified School District for 41 years, a resident of San Luis Obispo, and the Geographic Neighborhood Association Representative for the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), I love the vibrancy students bring to our community - from 5 years old, to teens, to college students, and adult learners. I found the Grand Jury investigation report interesting and very accurate. As you know, the Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the elected and appointed officials of the City of San Luis Obispo were continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods, some with families and the elderly, from the dangerous “St. Fratty's Day” event and other raucous weekends. The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after Police Chief Rick Scott had announced to the City and the public that his department's enforcement plan was used for the “St. Fratty's Day” event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was “successful.” Many people found that announcement alarming, as there had continued growth of unruly crowds, going from 2,000 in 2022 to more than 7,000 in 2024. The management of the chaos was indeed not a “success.” 5 At the City Council gatherings and at meetings of the SCLC, San Luis Obispo City Manager Whitney McDonald stated that the Council's goal was to have “St. Fratty’s Day end.” Chief Scott’s announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate, fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents' efforts to bring an end to “St. Fratty’s Day” was finally taken seriously, and coordinated efforts resulted in a positive result in 2025. Due to my participation on the SCLC, I found great relief knowing that a second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the City to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods. It has been noted that after an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the City of San Luis Obispo has failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors complete extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed firsthand what occurs in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. Each Council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties. Each Council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see firsthand what they have to endure. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, no one has taken individuals up on their invitations. Resident groups and residents have met with Council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses, which center around insufficient staff, including code enforcement personnel. Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many moving away from these neighborhoods, turning even more homes in those neighborhoods into student rentals. At nearly every SCLC meeting, I share positive communication about the neighborhoods, students, and community members, and opportunities for students to be positively involved in our town. I also share the emails that I have personally received from residents. When I read the emails aloud, it is not uncommon for there to be no response from fellow SCLC members and /or members of the Cal Poly Greek life who vehemently express their desire for the illegal fraternities in the R-1 and R-2 zones to be known as “satellite" fraternities. The SCLC committee has been unable to find solutions for the problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. Additionally, Cal Poly is purposely erasing previously provided addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. If you desire to form an AD HOC committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please state how the City is going to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. That is the proverbial elephant in the room. 6 Perhaps your response could include that the City is going to form a task force comprised of City staff, Cal Poly staff, and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations, in an attempt to begin the process of actually doing something concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by fraternities that are truly destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods. Another response could be that the City will fund an additional code enforcement official to exclusively address zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods of these illegal operations. The City could also encourage Cal Poly to construct and maintain a Greek Row of sorts on the Cal Poly land! Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 7 From:Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:36 AM To:Business, Tax Subject:RE: Business License Attention Required Thank you for the update! Alice Alice Waters Senior Staff Accountant Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity, Inc. 5635 Castle Creek Parkway N. Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46250 317-579-5050 ext: 0229 Fax: 317-579-5051 From: Business, Tax <bt@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:42 AM To: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Subject: RE: Business License Attention Required Hi Alice, Thank you for looking into this further and providing the correct gross receipts for sales in the City of SLO. I’ve updated the gross receipts on your renewal which resulted in a refund of $291.57. We will send a check your way in the next 1-2 weeks. Your renewal has been approved, and we will send the license by mail shortly. Take care, Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org 8 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:10 PM To: Business, Tax <bt@slocity.org> Cc: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Subject: RE: Business License Attention Required Thank you for reaching out. I apologize, I made a mistake on the renewal. I reported the revenue for the incorrect chapter on the business license renewal. Please see the attached correct income statement for Epsilon Omega as of 7/31/2024. The correct revenue is $ The incorrect amount reported was $ Please let me know how to get this corrected. I apologize for the error. Thank you for your assistance. Alice Alice Waters Senior Staff Accountant Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity, Inc. 5635 Castle Creek Parkway N. Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46250 317-579-5050 ext: 0229 Fax: 317-579-5051 From: bt@slocity.org <bt@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:08 PM To: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Subject: Business License Attention Required Hello Alpha Chi Omega National Housing Corporation, Account Number: 109713 Your City of San Luis Obispo business license renewal and payment has been received. However, we cannot issue a license at this time because there was a significant variance in the gross receipts compared to the prior fiscal year. To receive your business license and avoid potential late fees, please provide a written explanation for the gross receipt variance. A reply to this email is sufficient. Please respond within the next ten days. Thank you, City of San Luis Obispo Business License & Tax Division 990 Palm St San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7134 9 From:Matthew < Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 9:03 AM To:Zion, Sarah Subject:Re: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Yes, I confirm. On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 8:52 AM Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> wrote: Matthew, Please confirm in writing that you waive your right to have your hearing held within 60 days of filing your appeal. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2025 10:58 AM 10 To: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Yes, I accept. On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:14 AM Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Matthew, The hearing officer has reviewed your request and a continuance can be granted to September 23, 2025, at 3:00 pm. If you choose to accept this continuance, please confirm in writing that you waive your right to have your hearing held within 60 days of filing your appeal. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:32 AM 11 To: Matthew < ; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Hello Matthew, Your request has been sent to the hearing officer. I will send an update once a determination has been made. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:17 AM To: City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Hearing Officer Sharon Whitney c/o City Attorney’s Office 12 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dear Hearing Officer Whitney, I hope you are doing well. I am writing to respectfully request a continuance of my administrative appeal hearing currently scheduled for July 31, 2025, at 3:30 PM for Administrative Citation #ADM 42480. My executive board and I, who are representing our fraternity's house in this matter, are home for the summer and working full-time jobs. Given our work commitments and the travel distance, it is difficult for us to attend the scheduled hearing date. We want to appear in person to present our case and ensure we can answer any questions directly. Therefore, I request that the hearing be rescheduled to a date in late September, once we have returned to San Luis Obispo and can fully participate in the process. I believe this constitutes good cause for a continuance, as it impacts our ability to represent ourselves. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if you need any additional information or documentation from me. Best, Matthew Gnos 13 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:57 AM To:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: July 15 - 2025; Item 8a Hi Mila, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for tonight’s meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:40 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: July 15 - 2025; Item 8a July 15, 2025 Agenda Item: 8a Dear Mayor Stewart and Council Members: As a local teacher who has taught in the San Luis Coastal Unified School District for 41 years, a resident of San Luis Obispo, and the Geographic Neighborhood Association Representative for the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), I love the vibrancy students bring to our community - from 5 years old, to teens, to college students, and adult learners. I found the Grand Jury investigation report interesting and very accurate. As you know, the Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the elected and appointed officials of the City of San Luis Obispo were continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods, some with families and the elderly, from the dangerous “St. Fratty's Day” event and other raucous weekends. 14 The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after Police Chief Rick Scott had announced to the City and the public that his department's enforcement plan was used for the “St. Fratty's Day” event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was “successful.” Many people found that announcement alarming, as there had continued growth of unruly crowds, going from 2,000 in 2022 to more than 7,000 in 2024. The management of the chaos was indeed not a “success.” At the City Council gatherings and at meetings of the SCLC, San Luis Obispo City Manager Whitney McDonald stated that the Council's goal was to have “St. Fratty’s Day end.” Chief Scott’s announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate, fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents' efforts to bring an end to “St. Fratty’s Day” was finally taken seriously, and coordinated efforts resulted in a positive result in 2025. Due to my participation on the SCLC, I found great relief knowing that a second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the City to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods. It has been noted that after an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the City of San Luis Obispo has failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors complete extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed firsthand what occurs in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. Each Council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties. Each Council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see firsthand what they have to endure. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, no one has taken individuals up on their invitations. Resident groups and residents have met with Council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses, which center around insufficient staff, including code enforcement personnel. Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many moving away from these neighborhoods, turning even more homes in those neighborhoods into student rentals. At nearly every SCLC meeting, I share positive communication about the neighborhoods, students, and community members, and opportunities for students to be positively involved in our town. I also share the emails that I have personally received from residents. When I read the emails aloud, it is not uncommon for there to be no response from fellow SCLC members and /or members of the Cal Poly Greek life who vehemently express their desire for the illegal fraternities in the R-1 and R-2 zones to be known as “satellite" fraternities. The SCLC committee has been unable to find solutions for the problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. 15 Additionally, Cal Poly is purposely erasing previously provided addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. If you desire to form an AD HOC committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please state how the City is going to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. That is the proverbial elephant in the room. Perhaps your response could include that the City is going to form a task force comprised of City staff, Cal Poly staff, and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations, in an attempt to begin the process of actually doing something concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by fraternities that are truly destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods. Another response could be that the City will fund an additional code enforcement official to exclusively address zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods of these illegal operations. The City could also encourage Cal Poly to construct and maintain a Greek Row of sorts on the Cal Poly land! Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 16 From:Zion, Sarah Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:53 AM To:Matthew Subject:RE: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Matthew, Please confirm in writing that you waive your right to have your hearing held within 60 days of filing your appeal. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2025 10:58 AM To: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Yes, I accept. On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:14 AM Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Matthew, 17 The hearing officer has reviewed your request and a continuance can be granted to September 23, 2025, at 3:00 pm. If you choose to accept this continuance, please confirm in writing that you waive your right to have your hearing held within 60 days of filing your appeal. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Zion, Sarah <SZion@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:32 AM To: Matthew < ; City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Hello Matthew, Your request has been sent to the hearing officer. I will send an update once a determination has been made. Sarah Zion pronouns she/her/hers Legal Assistant II 18 City Attorney's Office 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E szion@slocity.org T 805.783.7856 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Matthew < Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 9:17 AM To: City_Attorney <City_Attorney@slocity.org> Subject: Request to Continue Administrative Hearing to Late September - Citation #ADM 42480 Hearing Officer Sharon Whitney c/o City Attorney’s Office 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Dear Hearing Officer Whitney, I hope you are doing well. I am writing to respectfully request a continuance of my administrative appeal hearing currently scheduled for July 31, 2025, at 3:30 PM for Administrative Citation #ADM 42480. My executive board and I, who are representing our fraternity's house in this matter, are home for the summer and working full-time jobs. Given our work commitments and the travel distance, it is difficult for us to attend the scheduled hearing date. We want to appear in person to present our case and ensure we can answer any questions directly. Therefore, I request that the hearing be rescheduled to a date in late September, once we have returned to San Luis Obispo and can fully participate in the process. I believe this constitutes good cause for a continuance, as it impacts our ability to represent ourselves. 19 Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if you need any additional information or documentation from me. Best, Matthew Gnos 20 From:Business, Tax Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:42 AM To:Alice Waters Subject:RE: Business License Attention Required Hi Alice, Thank you for looking into this further and providing the correct gross receipts for sales in the City of SLO. I’ve updated the gross receipts on your renewal which resulted in a refund of $291.57. We will send a check your way in the next 1-2 weeks. Your renewal has been approved, and we will send the license by mail shortly. Take care, Maryanna Espejo-Moses pronouns she/her/hers Financial Analyst Finance 990 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mespejo@slocity.org T 805.781.7148 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:10 PM To: Business, Tax <bt@slocity.org> Cc: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Subject: RE: Business License Attention Required Thank you for reaching out. I apologize, I made a mistake on the renewal. I reported the revenue for the incorrect chapter on the business license renewal. Please see the attached correct income statement for Epsilon Omega as of 7/31/2024. The correct revenue is $ The incorrect amount reported was $ Please let me know how to get this corrected. I apologize for the error. Thank you for your assistance. Alice Alice Waters Senior Staff Accountant Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity, Inc. 5635 Castle Creek Parkway N. Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46250 21 317-579-5050 ext: 0229 Fax: 317-579-5051 From: bt@slocity.org <bt@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:08 PM To: Alice Waters <awaters@alphachiomega.org> Subject: Business License Attention Required Hello Alpha Chi Omega National Housing Corporation, Account Number: 109713 Your City of San Luis Obispo business license renewal and payment has been received. However, we cannot issue a license at this time because there was a significant variance in the gross receipts compared to the prior fiscal year. To receive your business license and avoid potential late fees, please provide a written explanation for the gross receipt variance. A reply to this email is sufficient. Please respond within the next ten days. Thank you, City of San Luis Obispo Business License & Tax Division 990 Palm St San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 781-7134 22 From:Mila Vujovich-LaBarre < Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:40 AM To:E-mail Council Website Subject:July 15 - 2025; Item 8a July 15, 2025 Agenda Item: 8a Dear Mayor Stewart and Council Members: As a local teacher who has taught in the San Luis Coastal Unified School District for 41 years, a resident of San Luis Obispo, and the Geographic Neighborhood Association Representative for the Student Community Liaison Committee (SCLC), I love the vibrancy students bring to our community - from 5 years old, to teens, to college students, and adult learners. I found the Grand Jury investigation report interesting and very accurate. As you know, the Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the elected and appointed officials of the City of San Luis Obispo were continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods, some with families and the elderly, from the dangerous “St. Fratty's Day” event and other raucous weekends. The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after Police Chief Rick Scott had announced to the City and the public that his department's enforcement plan was used for the “St. Fratty's Day” event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was “successful.” Many people found that announcement alarming, as there had continued growth of unruly crowds, going from 2,000 in 2022 to more than 7,000 in 2024. The management of the chaos was indeed not a “success.” At the City Council gatherings and at meetings of the SCLC, San Luis Obispo City Manager Whitney McDonald stated that the Council's goal was to have “St. Fratty’s Day end.” Chief Scott’s announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate, fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents' efforts to bring an end to “St. Fratty’s Day” was finally taken seriously, and coordinated efforts resulted in a positive result in 2025. Due to my participation on the SCLC, I found great relief knowing that a second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the City to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods. It has been noted that after an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the City of San Luis Obispo has failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors complete extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed firsthand what occurs in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. 23 Each Council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties. Each Council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see firsthand what they have to endure. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, no one has taken individuals up on their invitations. Resident groups and residents have met with Council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses, which center around insufficient staff, including code enforcement personnel. Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many moving away from these neighborhoods, turning even more homes in those neighborhoods into student rentals. At nearly every SCLC meeting, I share positive communication about the neighborhoods, students, and community members, and opportunities for students to be positively involved in our town. I also share the emails that I have personally received from residents. When I read the emails aloud, it is not uncommon for there to be no response from fellow SCLC members and /or members of the Cal Poly Greek life who vehemently express their desire for the illegal fraternities in the R-1 and R-2 zones to be known as “satellite" fraternities. The SCLC committee has been unable to find solutions for the problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. Additionally, Cal Poly is purposely erasing previously provided addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. If you desire to form an AD HOC committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please state how the City is going to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. That is the proverbial elephant in the room. Perhaps your response could include that the City is going to form a task force comprised of City staff, Cal Poly staff, and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations, in an attempt to begin the process of actually doing something concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by fraternities that are truly destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods. Another response could be that the City will fund an additional code enforcement official to exclusively address zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods of these illegal operations. The City could also encourage Cal Poly to construct and maintain a Greek Row of sorts on the Cal Poly land! Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Mila Vujovich-La Barre 24 From:Amoroso, Brian Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 8:25 AM To:Schafer, Aaron Subject:FW: PRESS - Frat parties in SLO From: Amoroso, Brian Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 5:39 PM To: Laura.Parnaby@mailonline.com Subject: FW: PRESS - Frat parties in SLO Good evening Laura, Thank you for reaching out regarding issues and frustrations being reported by a few homeowners living in our community. The San Luis Obispo Police Department takes neighborhood civility very seriously and have dedicated countless hours of education and enforcement to reduce disruptions in the neighborhoods surrounding Cal Poly University. As is common in many cities that are adjacent to major universities, there is often friction between college students and full-time residents in these neighborhoods. Here are a few examples of how the San Luis Obispo Police Department has responded to noise complaints:  The City of San Luis Obispo has a comprehensive noise abatement program that outlines guidelines for what constitutes a noise violation. Our Officers respond to noise complaints, and issue citations as appropriate based on observed behavior, with fines starting at $350 and rising to $1000 for continued violations.  The City has implemented a law for “Unruly Gatherings” which result in greater legal penalties for the violator.  Repeat noise violations result in increased fines, and citations can also be sent to property owners, to help gain compliance from problem locations.  The City has enacted a Safety Enhancement Zone, which effectively doubles fines for nuisance order crimes during peak periods including back-to-school week, Halloween and St. Patrick’s Day, as a deterrent to curb criminal behavior in the neighborhoods.  The Police Department created a party registration program in 2017, that allows resident to register a party with the city, providing a point of contact who can be called should a noise complaint be received. At that time, the residents have 20 minutes to end the noise, without receiving a citation. This program has proven to be extremely successful, with only 1% of registered parties receiving a noise citation in 2024.  In 2023 (the most recent annual data available), the total number of noise complaints received by the San Luis Obispo Police Department was the second lowest year since 2013. The San Luis Obispo Police Department is not ‘dismissive’ of our residents’ complaints, but unfortunately there are times were residents want to see more enforcement than can legally be applied. The following chart shows the number of noisy party complaints the San Luis Obispo Police Department has received and responded to since 2013 and the steady progress that continues to be made, in partnership with our community. 25 Lastly, the quote you are attributing to Chief Scott is not accurate at all regarding our response to noise complaints; our Officers respond to noise complaints nightly. I am unsure where this quote came from or if something Chief Scott said was taken out of context and is being reported to you as our generic response to parties, but that is absolutely untrue. Thank you. Brian Brian Amoroso Deputy Chief Police Department 1042 Walnut Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-2729 E bamoroso@slocity.org T 805.594.8016 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 26 This e-mail, and any files transmitted with it, are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, protected, and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Laura Parnaby <Laura.Parnaby@mailonline.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 1:57 PM To: Scott, Rick <rscott@slocity.org> Subject: PRESS - Frat parties in SLO This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Dear Mr Scott, I hope you're well. I'm a reporter with the Daily Mail based in New York. Today I spoke with a couple of residents from San Luis Obispo about the frat parties they say have been terrorizing their Alta Vista neighborhood - an area where frat houses are not permitted under zoning laws. They shared shocking footage of some of the harassment they have endured (https://howtoruinaneighborhood.com/disruption-retaliation-and-issues/) One of the residents said the police have been 'dismissive' of their complaints and said the chief told them 'someone would have to die or there would have to be serious property damage' for police to intervene, despite reporting extreme noise, harassment, and vandalism around their homes several times a week. I'm getting in touch in case you would like to comment on this - keen to hear your perspective. Please let me know if you would. If you have a media department where this query would be better directed, please let me know! Many thanks, Laura Parnaby New York Senior News Reporter Daily Mail Online | 51 Astor Place, 9th floor, New York NY 10003 27 Temp phone: (+44)07941513937 E-mail: laura.parnaby@mailonline.com Disclaimer This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. Registered No 84121 England. 28 From:Stewart, Erica A Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 7:56 AM To:carolyn smith Subject:Re: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Thank you for your input, Carolyn. I will take it into consideration for this evening’s deliberations. Sincerely, Erica Erica A. Stewart pronouns she/her/hers Mayor Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E estewart@slocity.org C 805.540.1154 slocity.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and l Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: carolyn smith < Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 8:54 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Mayor Stewart and Council Members: The Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the city was continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods from the dangerous drunken St. Fratty's Day event. The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after the police chief had announced to the city and the public that his department's enforcement plan that was used for the St. Fratty's Day event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was successful. This announcement was despite the continued growth of the rowdy drunken crowd rising from 2,000 in 2022 to 7,000+ in 2024, and despite the outcries from residents that it was indeed NOT a “success.” Residents feared that the St. Fratty's event in 2025 would be even larger and more dangerous since the chief was not acknowledging that more needed to be done. In fact, the council had insisted that the party had to end. The chief's announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents were finally taken seriously and coordinated efforts between the city and Cal Poly resulted in a positive result in 2025. Hopefully, that cooperation will continue next year, otherwise the event will recur. 29 A second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the city to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods that have been ravaging their lives. After an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the city has, in fact, failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors perform extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed first hand the extremely disturbing large fraternity parties that occur in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. That's more than anyone from the city has done. Each council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties in the Alta Vista and Monterey Heights neighborhoods. Each council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see first-hand what they have to endure but not one has taken up the invitation. Resident groups have met with council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses: insufficient staff and there's no money to hire more code enforcement personnel. This inaction has caused the problem only to get worse making these affected neighborhoods nearly unlivable as the Grand Jury concluded. Staff points out that noise complaints have been reduced since 2010 (a period of over FIFTEEN years), but what they fail to mention is that those numbers have remained at a nearly stagnant level for the past 10 years (hovering between 1400 and 1500). Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many taking the drastic measure of moving away from their long-term homes, causing even more homes in those neighborhoods to turn into student rentals. This could be a contributing factor in the reduction of noise complaints. The city's efforts of having “meetings” with Cal Poly have proven to be futile since nothing ever comes out of those meetings that resolves the problems. The Civility Report Staff mentions was an effort completed YEARS ago and the fraternities operating illegally in R-1 and R-2 zones is a more recent occurrence not even considered in that endeavor. Staff also mentions the efforts of SCLC as a method of helping to resolve town/gown issues. I was RQN's representative on SCLC for five years until the pandemic. Unfortunately, since then, the mission statement of the committee has changed (instigated by Cal Poly with concurrence by the city), resulting in a chilling effect for residents in bringing up problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. Thus, there's little to no coordinated effort to actually deal with the illegal fraternity operations causing neighborhood problems in that committee. It has become an exchange of information group with little to no conversations on how to solve town/gown problems. Additionally, over city staff's objections, Cal Poly is purposely violating AB 524 by erasing previously provided street addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. It appears, however, there have been no efforts made by the city to adjudicate this dispute. Further, the city should be making Cal Poly accountable for inviting new fraternities without providing accommodation for them. Cal Poly should not be sanctioning fraternity parties without Staff or Cal Poly PD doing any on-site monitoring for noise or other infractions to protect neighborhood residents from the mayhem they've been experiencing from these sanctioned parties and events. Therefore, if you feel you must form an ad hoc committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please focus your response on how the city is going to do better to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. Perhaps your response could include that (1) the city is going to form a task force comprised of city staff and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations (with the addition of Cal Poly sometime during the process), in an attempt to begin actually doing som ething concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by Cal Poly fraternities that are destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods; (2) the city will fund an additional code enforcement official 30 to exclusively deal with the fraternity zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods from these illegal operations; (3) the city intends to adjudicate the actions of Cal Poly removing street addresses of their fraternity operations from their reporting required under AB 524. These responses would be effective in demonstrating a genuine plan of action to help residents negatively affected by the ever- increasing population of Cal Poly students and fraternity operations in our once peaceful family neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Carolyn Smith SLO City Resident 31 From:main@ITGA.groups.io on behalf of main@ITGA.groups.io <digestnoreply@groups.io> Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 6:11 AM To:Stewart, Erica A Subject:[ITGA] International Town & Gown Association - Digest #13 This is a digest for International Town & Gown Association. View all your groups.io groups, and edit your subscriptions, here. Do not reply to this email. To reply to a message, click the Reply link under the message. TOPICS IN THIS DIGEST: . 1. Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices (5) MESSAGES: . 1a. Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices From: victoria.hughes@stonybrook.edu Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:06:10 PDT Hi all, My name is Victoria (Vic), I'm the Coordinator for Commuter Student Services and Off-Campus Living at Stony Brook. I'm working on creating a new peer to peer education pilot, mirroring UC Boulder's "Neighborhood Ambassador" program. Our university is very involved and well-versed in the off-campus living space, but this program specifically will be a new venture for us. In a general sense, what we're looking to do is train students to conduct peer to peer workshops that will educate on local ordinances, Social Host Law, how to have "safe and successful" off- campus gatherings, how to be a good neighbor, and how to deal with any misunderstandings (within reason) between them and their neighbors. We also are floating the idea of providing "housewarming" giveaways, but we're not quite sure what that will look like. Stony Brook is very residential, it's not like what you would consider a "typical" college town, so students renting off- campus are in very close proximity to folks who have lived here for many years. We work closely with local PD when noise complaints and other incidences involving students come up, and address identified students from the standpoint of trying to help them be responsible hosts, and understand what's expected of them. We're wanting to be more proactive in getting ahead of these incidents, by providing some education to key groups (Fraternity & Sorority Life, Athletics etc.). To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Groups.io 32 Does anyone have programs like this at their institution? I'm looking for best practices, what's worked/what hasn't worked. Any advice or guidance would be appreciated! Thank you for your input, I look forward to hearing from you all. Best, Vic View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic 1b. Re: Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices From: Kryssa Cooper Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:06:23 PDT We do not, but we are looking to expand our programming for off-campus students. I will be interested in the responses! Kryssa Kryssa Cooper Special Assistant to the Vice President for Student Affairs Asst. Vice President for Student Affairs Office of the Vice President, Division of Student Affairs Clemson University 1376 Tiger Blvd Suite 104 Clemson, SC 29631 864-656-9726 Division of Student Affairs 33 From: main@ITGA.groups.io <main@ITGA.groups.io> on behalf of victoria.hughes via groups.io <victoria.hughes=stonybrook.edu@groups.io> Date: Monday, July 14, 2025 at 3:06 PM To: main@ITGA.groups.io <main@ITGA.groups.io> Subject: [ITGA] Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices This Message Is From An External Sender: Use caution when opening links or attachments if you do not recognize the sender. Hi all, My name is Victoria (Vic), I'm the Coordinator for Commuter Student Services and Off-Campus Living at Stony Brook. I'm working on creating a new peer to peer education pilot, mirroring UC Boulder's "Neighborhood Ambassador" program. Our university is very involved and well-versed in the off-campus living space, but this program specifically will be a new venture for us. In a general sense, what we're looking to do is train students to conduct peer to peer workshops that will educate on local ordinances, Social Host Law, how to have "safe and successful" off- campus gatherings, how to be a good neighbor, and how to deal with any misunderstandings (within reason) between them and their neighbors. We also are floating the idea of providing "housewarming" giveaways, but we're not quite sure what that will look like. Stony Brook is very residential, it's not like what you would consider a "typical" college town, so students renting off- campus are in very close proximity to folks who have lived here for many years. We work closely with local PD when noise complaints and other incidences involving students come up, and address identified students from the standpoint of trying to help them be responsible hosts, and understand what's expected of them. We're wanting to be more proactive in getting ahead of these incidents, by providing some education to key groups (Fraternity & Sorority Life, Athletics etc.). Does anyone have programs like this at their institution? I'm looking for best practices, what's worked/what hasn't worked. Any advice or guidance would be appreciated! Thank you for your input, I look forward to hearing from you all. Best, Vic View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic 34 1c. Re: Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices From: Schwendeman-Curtis,Justin Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:20:56 PDT Hi There! Colorado State University has programs like this. We offer a variety of workshops and learning opportunities for students living off-campus. We too have a fairly residential breakdown of the city, with students living next door to long-term residents. Happy to connect with folks if they want to email me 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Justin Schwendeman-Curtis, (he/him/his) (why pronouns?) Assistant Director |Off-Campus Life |Colorado State University Justin.Schwendeman-Curtis@colostate.edu | (970) 491-2248 View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic 1d. Re: Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices From: george nonis Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:47:11 PDT I am president of Narragansett 2100, a non profit organization of property owners with rental property in the town of Narragansett, RI. Narragansett is a coastal community about 15 minutes from the University of Rhode Island. Its location close to the beaches and mostly single family homes, makes it very attractive for URI students. The town has been an attractive off campus housing location for over 50 years. The university has about 17,000 students. It only provides on campus housing for 6,000 students. Narragansett houses about 7,000 students. Narragansett has been an attractive place for investors since it provides for student rentals for 9 months of the year and weekly rentals in the Summer. Most of the homes are within residential areas. So there is a constant battle between student behavior and older residents who bought homes prior to the rental market happening.There is a group of vocal residents who do not like students, landlords or tourists. They push a Residents Only agenda. Our group supports students and tourists for the positive effect they have on local businesses especially during the off tourist season. 35 We have legally challenged and won several town ordinances aimed at reducing the number of students renting and tourists. We work closely with the local police, local property managers, URI administrators and URI Greek Life to educate students on good behavior. We have a program called Hello Neighbor which conducts and promotes food drives, beach and neighborhood cleanups. We promote the good work students do in the community in conjunction with Greek Life. In the last election, Greek Life registered students to vote locally. Five new Town Council members were elected who were more supportive of student rights. There is some effort by Greek Life in educating their members on off campus behavior but we could do more. So I'm interested in the educational programs of others here. Thanks George Nonis, President, Narragansett2100 . . On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 4:20 PM Schwendeman-Curtis,Justin via groups.io <justin.schwendeman -curtis=colostate.edu@groups.io> wrote: View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic 1e. Re: Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices From: Kryssa Cooper Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:35:56 PDT Hi George, This does remind me that we do have programs within our FSL that work on this particular issue. Let me see if I can connect you with them, and perhaps it is a program we can scaffold among other off-campus student communities! Thank you for the reminder! Kryssa 36 Kryssa Cooper Special Assistant to the Vice President for Student Affairs Asst. Vice President for Student Affairs Office of the Vice President, Division of Student Affairs Clemson University 1376 Tiger Blvd Suite 104 Clemson, SC 29631 864-656-9726 Division of Student Affairs From: main@ITGA.groups.io <main@ITGA.groups.io> on behalf of george nonis via groups.io <gsnonis=gmail.com@groups.io> Date: Monday, July 14, 2025 at 4:47 PM To: main@ITGA.groups.io <main@ITGA.groups.io> Subject: Re: [ITGA] Peer to peer education concept- seeking best practices This Message Is From An External Sender: Use caution when opening links or attachments if you do not recognize the sender. I am president of Narragansett 2100, a non profit organization of property owners with rental property in the town of Narragansett, RI. Narragansett is a coastal community about 15 minutes from the University of Rhode Island. Its location close to the beaches and mostly single family homes, makes it very attractive for URI students. The town has been an attractive off campus housing location for over 50 years. 37 The university has about 17,000 students. It only provides on campus housing for 6,000 students. Narragansett houses about 7,000 students. Narragansett has been an attractive place for investors since it provides for student rentals for 9 months of the year and weekly rentals in the Summer. Most of the homes are within residential areas. So there is a constant battle between student behavior and older residents who bought homes prior to the rental market happening.There is a group of vocal residents who do not like students, landlords or tourists. They push a Residents Only agenda. Our group supports students and tourists for the positive effect they have on local businesses especially during the off tourist season. We have legally challenged and won several town ordinances aimed at reducing the number of students renting and tourists. We work closely with the local police, local property managers, URI administrators and URI Greek Life to educate students on good behavior. We have a program called Hello Neighbor which conducts and promotes food drives, beach and neighborhood cleanups. We promote the good work students do in the community in conjunction with Greek Life. In the last election, Greek Life registered students to vote locally. Five new Town Council members were elected who were more supportive of student rights. There is some effort by Greek Life in educating their members on off campus behavior but we could do more. 38 So I'm interested in the educational programs of others here. Thanks George Nonis, President, Narragansett2100 . . On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 4:20 PM Schwendeman-Curtis,Justin via groups.io <justin.schwendeman -curtis=colostate.edu@groups.io> wrote: View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic All posts represent the views or opinions of the individual posting and do not reflect or are endorsed by ITGA unless explicitly stated. You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to main@ITGA.groups.io via estewart@slocity.org. You can unsubscribe here. To help protect your priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Groups.io © 2025 Groups.io 39 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 3:20 PM To:Brett Cross Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO COLLABORATE WITH STAFF TO PREPARE RESPONSES TO GRAND JURY REPORT “ROUND & ROUND WITH TOWN & GOWN” Hi Brett, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brett Cross < Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 2:36 PM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO COLLABORATE WITH STAFF TO PREPARE RESPONSES TO GRAND JURY REPORT “ROUND & ROUND WITH TOWN & GOWN” Dear City Council members, I'm not even sure how to address not only the current staff report or the City's response the Grand Jury report. All I can say is that I'm disappointed. Oh, and I get it. People or in this case the City doesn't like to be criticized, and the first instinct is to get defensive. And I understand that the Community Development Department has tried to deal with the Satellite Fraternities but just don't have the staff to effectively get a handle on it. Plus, Cal Poly is actively obstructing them in identifying those satellite fraternities. However, I think I could also use the term " Factual Inconsistencies" in both the City's response to the Grand Jury report and the current staff report. Just as an example- the current staff report mentions the City's Social Host ordinance. How many citations have been written under that section? The current report makes it appear as though this ordinance has effectively reduced the number of parties in which underage drinking is occurring. It hasn't. You know why? Because I don't think the City has written any of them. You know what is missing? Any discussion about the Grand Jury recommendations. Maybe that will come after the Ad Hoc committee is appointed. I certainly hope that the committee will hold meetings with residents in the Alta Vista neighborhood along with other interested groups- such as Residents for Quality Neighborhoods. 40 The neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly are, in a way, unlivable. That doesn't mean people aren't living there, but means that the noise from continuous noisy parties has made living there really difficult. Residents are being forced out of their homes. T hey are having to sell their houses and move away. That's unacceptable. You've got to understand that. You have to right? I shouldn't even have to make that a question. So what are you going to do? Sincerely, Brett Cross San Luis Obispo 41 From:Brett Cross < Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 2:36 PM To:E-mail Council Website Subject:APPOINT AN AD HOC COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO COLLABORATE WITH STAFF TO PREPARE RESPONSES TO GRAND JURY REPORT “ROUND & ROUND WITH TOWN & GOWN” Dear City Council members, I'm not even sure how to address not only the current staff report or the City's response the Grand Jury report. All I can say is that I'm disappointed. Oh, and I get it. People or in this case the City doesn't like to be criticized, and the first instinct is to get defensive. And I understand that the Community Development Department has tried to deal with the Satellite Fraternities but just don't have the staff to effectively get a handle on it. Plus, Cal Poly is actively obstructing them in identifying those satellite fraternities. However, I think I could also use the term " Factual Inconsistencies" in both the City's response to the Grand Jury report and the current staff report. Just as an example- the current staff report mentions the City's Social Host ordinance. How many citations have been written under that section? The current report makes it appear as though this ordinance has effectively reduced the number of parties in which underage drinking is occurring. It hasn't. You know why? Because I don't think the City has written any of them. You know what is missing? Any discussion about the Grand Jury recommendations. Maybe that will come after the Ad Hoc committee is appointed. I certainly hope that the committee will hold meetings with residents in the Alta Vista neighborhood along with other interested groups- such as Residents for Quality Neighborhoods. The neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly are, in a way, unlivable. That doesn't mean people aren't living there, but means that the noise from continuous noisy parties has made living there really difficult. Residents are being forced out of their homes. They are having to sell their houses and move away. That's unacceptable. You've got to understand that. You have to right? I shouldn't even have to make that a question. So what are you going to do? Sincerely, Brett Cross San Luis Obispo 42 From:Matthew < Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 2:26 PM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:Re: Special Event Notification - Lambda Chi Alpha, 10/29/2025 Thursday at 10 works great for me. Talk to you then On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 2:19 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Mathhew, I am available on Thursday morning (until noon) or all of Friday this week. Next week, my Monday and Tuesday are open from 9am-4pm. Let me know the best time on one of those days for you and I’ll send you a Teams meeting invite. You can call in or join the virtual meeting through that. Best, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Matthew < Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 1:49 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Special Event Notification - Lambda Chi Alpha, 10/29/2025 Hi Mallory, Thanks so much for the detailed information, it's very helpful. I’d definitely like to chat further to make sure I understand the process and discuss which permit option might work best for our event. Could we schedule a call sometime this week or early next week? Let me know what times work best for you. 43 On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 3:30 PM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Matthew, Any special events you would like to host that requires approval by the Community Development Director per Conditional No. 5 of your CUP will require an intermittent or temporary use permit. A temporary use permit would be for a singular temporary event, whereas the intermittent use permit would cover reoccurring events (i.e., annually, quarterly, etc.). The intermittent or temporary use permits are processed as Director’s Actions applications. The fee for Director’s Action is currently $3,051.99 (City Fee Schedule FY 25-26). However, if the event is for philanthropy efforts, we have a Non-profit Special Event Fee of $212.28. Given you stated the haunted house event will be a fundraiser, I’m guessing it’s a philanthropy event and may be able to be processed with the non-profit event fee. All Director’s Action applications require: 1. A Planning Application (Planning App Form), 2. A project description (including details about the type of event, timing, attendance estimates, security plans, food and drinks, etc.). a. If you are hoping to have the event intermittently, please include details in the description about that intention and estimates for reoccurrence timing. 3. Site plan (including details about parking, bathrooms, food and drink areas, etc.). If you’re requesting to file under the non-profit fee, you’d likely need to provide proof of your 501(c)(3) status and the project description should include information about the non-profit benefactor. A Director’s Action application is processed at the staff level and requires us to provide public notice (legal ads and site poster) but does not include a public hearing. The general timeline for processing a Director’s Action is 6-10 weeks. This means you’ll want to submit all the materials to apply for the haunted house by mid-September at the latest. As for a Transportation Management Plan, please coordinate with Adam Fukushima (afukushi@slocity.org) on what should be included and if he has examples for you to reference. I’ve given him a heads up that you’ll be contacting him! You will likely want to include the transportation management plan with the Director’s Action submittal, as they require the minimum 30-days review anyway. From a longer-term event planning perspective, you can file for an intermittent use permit that is more general and might encapsulate regularly scheduled events without having fully fleshed out details. If you want to chat more about this, let me know, as I think a call or in-person meeting would be the best way to provide you more details about this process. Let me know if you have any questions! 44 Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Matthew < Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 6:41 PM To: Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Special Event Notification - Lambda Chi Alpha, 10/29/2025 Hi Mallory, Thank you for the response. We’re aware of the outstanding invoice and are working on getting it resolved. In the meantime, we’d like to get started on the event application process so we don't fall behind any deadlines, if that’s allowed. Please let me know if we can begin preparing or submitting materials while we work on settling the fees. I'll be on the lookout for your follow-up with more details. Best, Matthew On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Matthew, Thank you for reaching out. You will need to submit an application for the event review, but I will follow up with a more detailed response on that process and associated fees in the next week. 45 However, in beginning looking into your request, I was notified of your outstanding invoice. The Community Development Department is still waiting on completion fees from your organization from the processing of your original use permit application (USE-0331-2023). I have attached a copy of the invoice here for your reference (Invoice # 00037373). I believe you’ve coordinated with Hannah Hanh about these fees most recently. You will need to pay the completion fees before we are able to process or review a request for a special event. Let me know if you have any questions. I’ll be in touch soon. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Matthew < Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 1:25 PM To: Planning <planning@slocity.org> Cc: blakebrennan29@gmail.com Subject: Special Event Notification - Lambda Chi Alpha, 10/29/2025 Dear San Luis Obispo Planning Committee, My name is Matthew Gnos, and I am a representative of the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity, located at 1264 East Foothill Blvd. We are planning to host a haunted house fundraiser at our chapter house, 1264 East Foothill Blvd, on 10/29/2025 from 8 pm to 11 pm. We expect more than 48 attendees and are therefore submitting this notice per our Conditional Use Permit. We will be preparing a written notice for neighbors within 300 feet, and we are committed to complying with all relevant conditions, including the requirement for a Transportation Management Plan. To ensure we meet the city’s expectations, would you be able to provide us with a draft or template of an acceptable Transportation Management Plan for an event of this nature? We would appreciate any guidance or examples you can share. 46 I have also CC’d Blake Brennan, our Vice President, who is leading the planning for this event. Please let us know if you require any additional documentation or clarification. We look forward to your review and approval. Best, Matthew Gnos LCA Risk Manager 47 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 11:25 AM To:kathie walker Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Ad Hoc Committee (Item 8a.) and clarification of "Background" provided in the agenda Hi Kathie, Thank you for your additional input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2025 12:58 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Ad Hoc Committee (Item 8a.) and clarification of "Background" provided in the agenda Dear City Councilmembers, I have been closely following the City Council and policy decisions in San Luis Obispo for over a decade and have a good understanding of the historical context of several issues. There is value in understanding that history. When there is turnover in City leadership and new Councilmembers are elected, or new staff leadership is hired, they usually do not fully understand the complexities of the background that led to certain policies. Jan Marx is the most knowledgeable about the subject investigated by the Grand Jury. I have watched her input be dismissed at times, despite her expertise in these issues, which is unfortunate. When it comes to noise in the Alta Vista neighborhood, Ms. Marx lived it firsthand. It got worse after she moved away, and a lot more illegal fraternities moved into the neighborhood, but she is the most experienced person on the Council and is familiar with the relevant issues. Ms. Marx should be on the Ad Hoc Committee to respond to the Grand Jury. It appears that the mayor must comment according to California Penal Code 933. It’s not clear whether that means she would also be on the Ad Hoc committee. If so, she would be an asset. 48 Otherwise, I recommend that the second member of the Ad Hoc Committee be Emily Francis or Mike Boswell. I feel that Jan’s input should be considered for who she feels would be the best fit to work together for this important role. Some of my reasons for not including Michelle Shoresman are included in the correspondence below. This is nothing personal against Michelle, and I think she is a nice person. However, she has failed to recognize the issue, has not supported Jan Marx’s attempt to have the item agendized (Erica Stewart did support the idea), has minimized the failure of the City, including Code Enforcement, to respond to complaints, among several other things that seems to indicate she is more aligned with City staff and Cal Poly than concerned about the constituents who elected her to represent them. The Council agenda for July 15, 2025, item 8a, lists the “Background” of the City’s efforts toward “neighborhood wellness”. Some of the information provided on the agenda is false. I want to provide the correct information so that the misinformation can be corrected. Also, I hope that you focus on the core issues that are relevant to the CURRENT situation by acknowledging the ext ent to which it exists. Programs and Policies The Background in the agenda says, “many of the approaches have been intended to address the neighborhood impacts of excessive noise from gatherings,” and lists various programs and policies. We have lived in the neighborhood since the inception of these programs and policies, and can unequivocally tell you that despite each of the listed items, the noise exponentially increased in the Fall of 2021. This correlates to the significant increase i n illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood. Several fraternities moved near our home in 2021, and many were the Main Chapter houses of Cal Poly's fraternities. Even more moved in in the Fall of 2022, including one right next door and another directly across the street from our home. More were established in 2023, also near our home on Kentucky and Stafford (496 Kentucky and 1350 Stafford) and on Stafford (1271, 1273, and 1275 Stafford). And even more were added nearby in 2024, including 1276 Bond. That does not include the dozens of others, which I will not list here, but I have previously provided the addresses. Each of them held fraternity-related events throughout the year, including rush events and sorority exchanges. The increased noise level in the Fall of 2021 was documented by first-hand accounts of long-term residents in several “neighborhood group” email exchanges. That’s when I started sending videos of fraternity parties to the City because loud parties at illegal fraternities that could be heard from a block away were being cleared by SLOPD as a negative violation or unable to locate. Prior to the Fall of 2021, I had never contacted SLOPD about noisy parties because they were not such a huge issue as they were beginning in the Fall of 2021. I never had any correspondence with SLOPD Chief Cantrell or Chief Linden whatsoever, because it was not necessary. I only sent one email to Chief Gessell related to the ongoing fireworks set off on Stafford at the rugby house, next to Sid and Isabel Marques. He was responsive and respectful and went to the house with the Fire Marshall. There was never another fireworks incident from that property. But since the Fall of 2021, the noise from the illegal fraternities has gotten progressively worse each year, and most of the long- term residents on the original email chain have left the neighborhood. I have corresponded with SLOPD leadership many, many times since then without resolution. It has been enormously frustrating. The issues have also been brought up in public forums such as the City Council and the SCLC, and the pushback and dishonesty from Police Chief Scott have been especially disheartening. Civility Report The City references the “Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group,” which worked on a plan for a couple of years to promote neighborhood wellness and produced a 90-page Final Report published in Spring 2015. There were six objectives in the Final Report. I have attached a condensed version, which was attached to a City Council Agenda on 12/1/2025, when the Council recommended expanding the SCLC to include two more residents who were “most directly involved with neighborhood wellness.” The Chair of the Alta Vista Neighborhood Association (AVNA), Karen Adler, was one of two people on the working group to address Objective One. She is still the Chair of AVNA, and her home is also now surrounded by illegal fraternities. She has expressed her extreme displeasure with the lack of enforcement by the City of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood. It is ridiculous for the City to continue to minimize the problem and not take meaningful action to fix it. 49 Below are the six objectives from the Civility Report. None of the recommendations for Objective One, shown below, are currently implemented: I am fairly certain that none of the recommendations in Objective Two related to neighborhood wellness are currently implemented, except maybe the City sends information to college students about trash collection. 50 Of all the recommendations listed in Objective Three, the only item that I know is currently implemented is the party registr ation program. It should be noted that RQN opposed that policy when it was adopted and is still opposed to the program. When a party is registered, SLOPD does not respond, and the reporting party is told to call back in 20 minutes if the party is still going. Fraternities were registering parties with over 100 people, and the nearby neighbors were woken by the party, then had to call SLOPD, and there were no consequences. It’s essentially a ‘free pass’ to have a loud party. Also, live bands are sometimes registered, even though they are not allowed by the program, but they get a warning call, and there are no consequences. The neighborhood is still disturbed by the loud music and guests leaving after the party is broken up, which can last an hour. The SCLC is also listed as a collaborative measure; however, the MOU for SCLC was recently revised to dilute the original pur pose of addressing issues between college students and nearby neighborhoods, and the neighborhood representatives for geographical neighborhoods and member-at-large are now elected rather than appointed by the Neighborhood Associations. Last year, two SCLC members brought up the illegal fraternity issue at every single meeting, and it was never addressed within the SCLC. 51 52 Objective Four mostly relates to law enforcement between Cal Poly and the City. One item related to neighborhood wellness was assigned to SCLC to “change the student culture related to neighborhood wellness”. As discussed, the most significant issue related to noise issues in the neighborhoods near campus, spreading to other neighborhoods in northern SLO, has not been discussed at the SCLC despite being brought up during every meeting. 53 Objective Five has one item, and I am not convinced that the City has “effectively informed the community on matters of neighborhood wellness” in an annual communications plan, especially related to illegal fraternity operations, which are the largest negative impact on affected neighborhoods. Objective Six is solely about SCLC. The action item of shifting memberships “to directly involve those individuals most directly involved in neighborhood wellness” is not currently happening. Aside from one RQN representative, there are only two 'neighborhood representatives', including the neighborhood-at-large representative, Abe Lincoln. He does not live in an affected neighborhood, does not belong to any group related to neighborhood wellness, and has criticized other representatives and community members for bringing up problems with noise and the illegal fraternity operations in the neighborhoods. Abe is a nice guy, but does not meet the qualifications intended for the seat he is occupying, and the proposed representative by the 54 Neighborhood Groups was rejected, even though they did meet the qualifications of the seat, and the MOU said that the Neighborhood Groups shall appoint that member. The perspective from neighborhoods most directly involved with noise is extremely diluted by the larger membership of Cal Poly and City representatives. The other two action items of an annual report and a town hall are not currently implemented. The SCLC meetings are subject to the Brown Act, but are not recorded and archived for the public, but they should be. Cal Poly Did Not Enforce the Zoning Ordinance When It Knew of the Illegal Fraternities in 2015 The City Council, City Manager, and other leadership knew about the small number of illegal fraternities on Hathway Avenue in 2015 because after the roof collapse on St. Fratty’s Day that year, Cal Poly hired an independent agency to investigate the incident. The report cited fraternities at 348 Hathway and “others” also on Hathway. That report was presented to the City Council and is included in an Agenda in 2015. SLOPD has also been aware of the illegal fraternity houses on Hathway since that time. Christine Wallace has said that the police department was very familiar with the identified Greek houses on Hathway dating back many years. Nonetheless, the City failed to enforce the zoning regulations in 2015 and set the stage for an explosion of more illegal fra ternity houses moving into the neighborhood. The fraternity members probably thought it was legal for them to operate because the City never took any proactive measures to stop their operations. Today, there are over 40 illegal fraternities in Alta Vista, and several others in Monterey Heights. There are also some west of Santa Rosa/Hwy 1. Cal Poly and Its Fraternities are Intentionally Breaking the Law For the past two academic years, Cal Poly administration, Greek Life staff, and IFC leadership have known it is not legal for them to operate in R1/R2 neighborhoods, but they have ignored the City’s laws. They host rush events to recruit new members and regularly hold blow-out fraternity events at their illegal fraternities in residential neighborhoods. We know these events are “fraternity-related” because they follow certain protocols, as required by Cal Poly Greek Life’s Event Registration Policy. Some indicators are fraternity member 'guards' at the front door wearing construction vests or shirts that say “security”, and they check in guests with laptops. I am certain that SLOPD is also familiar with these practices. The guests that go to the parties are 90% female and often are dressed in similar colors or themes, which indicates they are "exchanges" and registered beforehand with Cal Poly. The fraternities also post photos of events on Instagram at the illegal fraternity houses, whose 55 addresses have been previously documented by the City and which have identifiable features on their homes that are seen in the photos. Most of the Main Chapter Houses for Cal Poly’s 19 fraternities are in R1/R2 neighborhoods. Decrease in Noise vs. Increase in Illegal Fraternities The Background in the agenda cites a 45% decrease in noise complaints to SLOPD since 2010. This argument is a red herring to divert attention from the current issue and attempts to distract from the fact that the problem is ongoing and unresolved in the neighborhoods in the northern part of SLO, which is the subject of the Grand Jury’s report. In 2010, there were not 50+ illegal fraternity houses, and the noise complaints to SLOPD did not regularly include parties of 100-300 people in single-family neighborhoods, as they do today! Context matters. Some weekends, nearly 50% of all noise calls citywide are from fraternities, mostly illegally operating in the single-family neighborhoods. Also, many of the long-term residents have moved from these neighborhoods because they could not tolerate the noise from these illegal fraternity operations. It is disingenuous to minimize the immense problem that the residents of these neighborhoods endure every weekend that Cal Poly is in session, which was witnessed firsthand by the members of the Grand Jury. The City should admit there’s a problem, accept the recommendations, and move forward. Let’s work to solve the issue and hold those who are responsible accountable so the people who live in the neighborhoods can have the quiet enjoyment of their homes. DACs & Citations Are Usually Not Accurate When a DAC or noise citation is issued, the number of guests at a party is self-reported to SNAP or SLOPD by the person receiving the DAC or noise citation. For example, Delta Upsilon has an illegal fraternity house at 281 Albert Drive, and they hosted a concert there in May 2025. There were HUNDREDS of people in the backyard. You can see the party in a 1-minute video on their Instagram page here: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJXia7Uh8kO/?img_index=1 or here: https://vimeo.com/1094575248?share=copy#t=0 I SLOPD issued a noise citation to a Delta Upsilon fraternity member at 281 Albert Drive, and the citation said there were 50 people at that concert/party when there were actually at least 300 people. Law enforcement does not enter yards or count people. They ask the person getting the citation how many people are at the event, so the number on the citation is often not accurate, as people will say there is a lower number than the actual number of guests. It also does not reflect the impact of the event on the neighborhood. If the City is using this “data,” just know that it is self-reported by the offender and is not necessarily accurate. One other important point is that parties like the one shown in the video are common in the neighborhood and are rarely cited as unruly gatherings. There are parties that meet the legal standard of unruly gatherings every weekend that Cal Poly is in session, but very few are cited as unruly gatherings. Sometimes, SNAP responds to documented illegal fraternity houses that received letters from Code Enforcement, so a citation can’t even be issued unless SNAP calls SLOPD, but they usually don’t. If SLOPD were to cite these parties as unruly gatherings (which they are, according to the SLOMC), it would likely make an impact to stop them from continuing. Street Closure During St. Fratty’s Day 2022 In the agenda for 7/15/2025, the City claims, “It was not until 2023 that any extended street closure occurred in response to the party…” That is false. The neighborhood streets were barricaded by SLOPD in 2022 when about 2,000 people overtook the streets near our home. On March 12, 2022, St. Fratty’s Day, we were woken by fireworks at 4 a.m. Loud music was coming from MANY houses in the neighborhood because the party was pre-planned, according to many social media posts made on Friday, March 11, 2022, that talked about the St. Fratty’s Day party on Hathway in the early morning hours the next day. By 6 a.m., the intersection at Bond and Hathway was completely overtaken by the illegal street party, and people spanned from Fredericks to Carpenter and up Bond toward Kentucky Street. It was still dark outside, and I took a video of the crowd with my phone. 56 By around 7 a.m., SLOPD officers had blocked off the neighborhood with their vehicles. SLOPD had barricaded Hathway Avenue from Fredericks Street to Carpenter, and Bond Street was barricaded from Hathway Avenue to Kentucky Street. Officers at Fredericks and Hathway told me they had called their supervisor to the scene. I sent a timeline to the City Council of the SLOPD log from that morning to show the number of calls to our neighborhood. Some calls went unanswered for hours because there were not enough officers on duty to respond. Two of the calls I made to SLOPD did not even show up on the police log, including for a party at 348 Hathway, where many people were partying on the roof. It was one of the worst offenders that morning, and there was no response from SLOPD. My neighbor on Hathway also told me he called SLOPD, and his call was not listed. The log is attached to this email. Michelle Shoresman’s response to my email seemed to indicate that my “standards” were not realistic and that SLOPD had adequately handled the matter: “Thanks for the call log. I know you are frustrated and probably don’t think it’s sufficient, but I do happen to note that there are a large number of citations that were made, and even several arrests. I would think this is likely an improvement over past years, even if not still “enough” by your standards.” The truth is that the response in 2022 was not an improvement over past years because our neighborhood was not overtaken by thousands of people for an illegal street party before or after St. Fratty’s Day 2015, when a roof collapsed and ended the party by 6:30 a.m. In any event, the neighborhood streets were barricaded by SLOPD during St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, so hopefully the record is corrected. SLOPD Chief Rick Scott’s Statements to the Council Were Not True Since 2022, the SLOPD Chief Rick Scott has often falsely claimed that this event was “historically” large, as though it had happened in previous years after the roof collapse, but that is not true. We have lived in the neighborhood since St. Fratty’s Day was “founded” in 2009 by a fraternity at 348 Hathway Ave. It was not a street party until 2015, when the roof collapsed at around 6:15 a.m. It seems the Police Chief makes blanket statements, as though there have been illegal street parties during St. Fratty’s Day all along, to deflect the responsibility that, under his leadership, the neighborhood was taken over by thousands of people in 2022, 2023, and 2024. At a Council meeting on 3/15/2022, after St. Fratty’s Day, Chief Scott debriefed the Council: “We have been planning for St. Patrick’s Day for some time now…” and he minimized the magnitude of the event. He said it took “a couple of hours to get the situation under control,” when it actually lasted almost 6 hours, beginning at 4 a.m. He claimed SLOPD was “staffed up” for the event, anticipating crowds similar to numbers before the COVID-19 shutdown. SLOPD did not have additional staff that morning, and Deputy Chief Mickel explained that they were lucky that it happened near shift change, so they could hold over the night officers as the day officers came on duty. (DC Mickel was honest and transparent about the situation, and we appreciate him very much.) St. Fratty’s Day reemerged in 2022 and progressively got worse until it was finally stopped in 2025. The Grand Jury was corre ct in its finding that the event was not handled appropriately in 2022, 2023, and 2024 because SLOPD did not have enough staff to adequately handle the event. DC Mickel admitted that SLOPD was not prepared in 2023 during an RQN meeting. He also referenced the mistakes and failure of SLOPD to fully prepare in previous years (2022-2024) during his presentation to the Council on SLOPD’s plans for 2025. Council Meeting on March 15, 2022, after St. Fratty’s Day 2022 (before St. Patrick’s Day on March 17) During the Council meeting on 3/15/2022, Jan Marx asked that the Council agendize St. Fratty’s Day for discussion. While Erica Stewart supported a future conversation on an agenda, Michelle Shoresman did not support Ms. Marx’s suggestion. Ms. Shoresman said she didn’t want to agendize discussion on the expansion of the Safety Enhancement Zone to include St. Fratty’s Day and said “putting it in the bike rack” would work best for her. 57 It was disappointing that Ms. Shoresman did not give credit to Ms. Marx’s first-hand experience with the event and did not support even a discussion of the matter on a future agenda. Carlyn Christianson was also adamant in not agendizing the item, saying the trend was downwards and was of no concern. Emily Francis and Mike Boswell were not on the City Council then. Warning Before St. Fratty’s 2023 That Was Ignored and SLOPD Was Not Prepared St. Fratty’s Day is typically held on the Saturday before winter finals, and not necessarily the Saturday before St. Patrick’s Day. The event is centered around finals because many students leave town during the week of finals, and the students want to par ty while most are still in town. This should be noted for future years, since Cal Poly is converting to a semester system. In July 2022, I warned the City and SLOPD about St. Patrick’s Day and St. Fratty’s Day occurring on Friday/Saturday on the same weekend in 2023 and sent the graphic below to show the perfect-storm scenario that would likely result in an expansion and surge of partiers for St. Fratty’s Day. I thought that the failure to have an aggressive plan would result in legitimizing the event, which would cause the event to continue to gain traction and grow. Looking back, I believe the failure of SLOPD to have an adequate plan in 2023 set in motion the exponential growth of the event the following year. At that point, in 2024, it was too late for a Safety Enhancement Zone to have any meaningful effect. St. Fratty’s Day 2023 During the morning of St. Fratty’s Day 2023, SLOPD was not prepared for the incredibly large crowd of 3,000-4,000 people that showed up. You can watch a video from the event here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYkaOsCwBbA Again, during his debrief to the City Council after the event, Chief Scott did not admit that SLOPD was understaffed and caught off guard by a larger crowd than expected. He told the Council that it “wasn’t unexpected” that 3,000-4,000 people showed up in the neighborhood and that SLOPD was “staffed accordingly to address the concerns.” That was not true. He also said there would be an after-action analysis and would have ongoing dialogue with neighbors who live in the affected neighborhood. That also did not happen. He also said there would be an after-action report brought back to the Council, and Emily Francis asked about the timeline for the after-action report, but Chief Scott was evasive and did not have a timeline. Erica also asked about the after-action report. In fact, there was never an after-action report brought back to the Council for the public to hear. It was obvious to observers of St. Fratty’s Day 2023 that SLOPD was unprepared to handle the event. Videos of the event also show dangerous, illegal behavior that morning. EMS could not navigate the crowd. Dozens of people climbed utility poles. People were openly carrying and drinking alcohol. SLOPD officers stood around the perimeter and observed. Later, DC Fred 58 Mickel admitted on a couple of occasions that SLOPD was understaffed during the St. Fratty’s Day events before 2025 because they did not anticipate the number of people who showed up in the neighborhood. The ”Background” information provided in the Agenda further states: “As the crowds in 2024 grew even larger, the City’s departmental staffing became no longer sufficient to safely address and disperse the crowds gathered in the streets and properties near campus…” This implies that the staffing was sufficient in 2022 and 2023, which it was not. The Grand Jury investigated the City’s response from 2022 to 2024 and found that it was not sufficient, and the finding was correct. When someone (or an agency) is not honest about one thing, it makes people question their honesty about other things and hurts their overall credibility. The City should accept responsibility for the mistakes and celebrate the successes and lessons learned. Failing to take responsibility and making excuses makes the city look dishonest and erodes public confidence. Code Enforcement Failed to Investigate Complaints I sent an email to the Council and Community Development citing complaints I filed before fraternity rush events that were advertised on social media with specific dates, times, and addresses of the upcoming events. The fraternities held those events at the exact date, time, and address listed in my complaint, and none of them were cited by Code Enforcement. Michelle Shoresman said in an email that "the city can’t have eyes and ears everywhere", which seemed to excuse the City’s lack of enforcement. Her response was disheartening. Code Enforcement has continued to dismiss complaints of fraternity events at illegal fraternities in our neighborhood as unfounded, even when they are posted on the fraternity’s social media pages and we observe them happening. I’ve asked SLOPD for help to document the event as a fraternity-related event, and to cite it under the applicable code of illegal land use, but SLOPD leadership said they don’t handle that type of report and referred me to Code Enforcement. It's been a circular exercise that has not brought results, and the illegal fraternities continue to operate. The Grand Jury Findings During the City Council meeting in February 2025, DC Mickel gave the presentation for the plans for St. Fratty’s/St. Patrick’s Day 2025, he said SLOPD was reactive during previous years but had learned from their mistakes. Members of the Grand Jury were in the audience. The Jurors also had links to the Police Chief’s previous statements before and after St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, 2023 and 2024; recordings of the SCLC meetings where the Chief also made conflicting statements and Mila’s and Brett’s concerns were continually ignored and even criticized by other members of SCLC; and videos of St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, 2023, and 2024. They also had information about SLOPD policies and procedures, and statements made by two officers related to their response to noisy parties, which likely would not have been known to Christine Wallace. This may be why interviews with two police officers were requested by the Grand Jury, which was blocked by SLOPD, according to the Grand Jury report. The City also claims to have provided documentation, as requested by the Jurors. The findings in the Grand Jury report were based on everything that was provided to them and their observations of the neighborhood during weekends, over at least six months. The City had an ample opportunity to give them all the relevant information throughout the investigation. The City did not “fully cooperate” with the Grand Jury. The report says that the investigation was hampered because the Grand Jury was blocked from interviewing two police officers, despite repeated requests for interviews. The Jurors wanted answers relevant to some specific issues they were investigating that may not have been clear to the City, and it was not appropriate for the City to presume the Grand Jury did not need the testimony. I included the names of two officers in my complaint, and it was related to policy decisions and operations within SLOPD that would likely not be known to Christine Wallace, so that may have been the information they were seeking. The City claimed it would have taken up valuable time from the officers’ schedules, which is ludicrous. SLOPD leadership and officers sit in the audience during Council meetings and Planning Commission meetings, in case there are questions. They certainly had an hour to sit for an interview with the Grand Jury. It is disappointing that SLOPD did not fully cooperate with the Grand Jury, and two officers were prevented from testifying. 59 Beginning on Monday, June 16, 2025, there was a huge surge in activity on my husband's website HowToRuinANeighborhood.com, as multiple people origninating from SLO City (probably staff) went onto the website to search through all the tabs for information, presumably to prepare the response to the Grand Jury by June 20, 2025. I'm not sure what they were looking for, but the website contains video and other documentation related to the issues that were investigated by the Grand Jury. I am not sure if the Grand Jury even looked at the website. Finally, it is obvious that I have been invested in solving this problem for several years and have put my heart and soul into finding solutions. The reason I have made these efforts is because I DEEPLY love my home and property, with our beautiful view of Cerro San Luis from our kitchen and back deck, gardens we’ve cultivated over many years, and an ADU that was to provide income so we could retire. We did not want to be displaced and thought my efforts would result in enforcement and allow my husband and me to stay in our home. I felt as though I was fighting for our lives. When the City did not respond to help solve the issue, I went to the news, and they covered the story. Even the Editorial Board subsequently wrote an Editorial, urging the City to take action, but it has not. The story was picked up by the Daily Mail, and many people contacted us, including legitimate production companies who wanted to film a documentary about the issue. We did not want that sort of publicity and hoped the problem would be solved by the City. We also wrote to the Grand Jury, and they investigated the matter. The Grand Jury report gave us hope, but that was lost when we read the City's 27-page response. We gave up and decided to use our entire life savings for a down payment on a house in a quiet neighborhood, and needed co-signers to qualify for the payments. We do not have any retirement and will now try to get by month-to-month, with payments that exceed 70% of our income. Meanwhile, we, and others in the affected neighborhoods, have been damaged by the inaction of the City for several years. The City should own up to that. Please appoint Jan Marx and Emily Francis (or Mike Boswell) to the Ad Hoc Committee. The public deserves to provide input on this important issue. Thank you, Kathie Walker 12-01-2015 Item 14 - Action for Civility Report Recommendations.pdf 60 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 11:25 AM To:carolyn smith Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Hi Carolyn, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: carolyn smith < Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 8:55 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Mayor Stewart and Council Members: The Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the city was continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods from the dangerous drunken St. Fratty's Day event. The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after the police chief had announced to the city and the public that his department's enforcement plan that was used for the St. Fratty's Day event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was successful. This announcement was despite the continued growth of the rowdy drunken crowd rising from 2,000 in 2022 to 7,000+ in 2024, and despite the outcries from residents that it was indeed NOT a “success.” Residents feared that the St. Fratty's event in 2025 would be even larger and more dangerous since the chief was not acknowledging that more needed to be done. In fact, the council had insisted that the party had to end. The chief's announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents were finally taken seriously and coordinated efforts between the city and Cal Poly resulted in a positive result in 2025. Hopefully, that cooperation will continue next year, otherwise the event will recur. 61 A second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the city to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods that have been ravaging their lives. After an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the city has, in fact, failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors perform extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed first hand the extremely disturbing large fraternity parties that occur in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. That's more than anyone from the city has done. Each council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties in the Alta Vista and Monterey Heights neighborhoods. Each council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see first-hand what they have to endure but not one has taken up the invitation. Resident groups have met with council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses: insufficient staff and there's no money to hire more code enforcement personnel. This inaction has caused the problem only to get worse making these affected neighborhoods nearly unlivable as the Grand Jury concluded. Staff points out that noise complaints have been reduced since 2010 (a period of over FIFTEEN years), but what they fail to mention is that those numbers have remained at a nearly stagnant level for the past 10 years (hovering between 1400 and 1500). Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many taking the drastic measure of moving away from their long-term homes, causing even more homes in those neighborhoods to turn into student rentals. This could be a contributing factor in the reduction of noise complaints. The city's efforts of having “meetings” with Cal Poly have proven to be futile since nothing ever comes out of those meetings that resolves the problems. The Civility Report Staff mentions was an effort completed YEARS ago and the fraternities operating illegally in R-1 and R-2 zones is a more recent occurrence not even considered in that endeavor. Staff also mentions the efforts of SCLC as a method of helping to resolve town/gown issues. I was RQN's representative on SCLC for five years until the pandemic. Unfortunately, since then, the mission statement of the committee has changed (instigated by Cal Poly with concurrence by the city), resulting in a chilling effect for residents in bringing up problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. Thus, there's little to no coordinated effort to actually deal with the illegal fraternity operations causing neighborhood problems in that committee. It has become an exchange of information group with little to no conversations on how to solve town/gown problems. Additionally, over city staff's objections, Cal Poly is purposely violating AB 524 by erasing previously provided street addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. It appears, however, there have been no efforts made by the city to adjudicate this dispute. Further, the city should be making Cal Poly accountable for inviting new fraternities without providing accommodation for them. Cal Poly should not be sanctioning fraternity parties without Staff or Cal Poly PD doing any on-site monitoring for noise or other infractions to protect neighborhood residents from the mayhem they've been experiencing from these sanctioned parties and events. Therefore, if you feel you must form an ad hoc committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please focus your response on how the city is going to do better to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. Perhaps your response could include that (1) the city is going to form a task force comprised of city staff and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations (with the addition of Cal Poly sometime during the process), in an attempt to begin actually doing som ething concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by Cal Poly fraternities that are destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods; (2) the city will fund an additional code enforcement official 62 to exclusively deal with the fraternity zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods from these illegal operations; (3) the city intends to adjudicate the actions of Cal Poly removing street addresses of their fraternity operations from their reporting required under AB 524. These responses would be effective in demonstrating a genuine plan of action to help residents negatively affected by the ever- increasing population of Cal Poly students and fraternity operations in our once peaceful family neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Carolyn Smith SLO City Resident 63 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 11:25 AM To:carolyn smith Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Hi Carolyn, Thank you for your input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: carolyn smith < Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 8:55 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: City Council July 15, 2025 - Agenda Item 8a - Ad Hoc Council Committee re Grand Jury Report Mayor Stewart and Council Members: The Grand Jury investigation was instigated by residents who felt the city was continuing to fail in their duty to protect their neighborhoods from the dangerous drunken St. Fratty's Day event. The complaint was filed in June of 2024 after the police chief had announced to the city and the public that his department's enforcement plan that was used for the St. Fratty's Day event in March of 2024, the same plan used in prior years, was successful. This announcement was despite the continued growth of the rowdy drunken crowd rising from 2,000 in 2022 to 7,000+ in 2024, and despite the outcries from residents that it was indeed NOT a “success.” Residents feared that the St. Fratty's event in 2025 would be even larger and more dangerous since the chief was not acknowledging that more needed to be done. In fact, the council had insisted that the party had to end. The chief's announcement of success and denial of residents' pleas for better enforcement was the impetus that caused desperate fearful residents to file a Grand Jury Complaint. Fortunately, residents were finally taken seriously and coordinated efforts between the city and Cal Poly resulted in a positive result in 2025. Hopefully, that cooperation will continue next year, otherwise the event will recur. 64 A second Grand Jury complaint was submitted by frustrated residents in the Alta Vista Neighborhood who have been pleading with the city to enforce its zoning codes to eliminate illegal fraternity operations in R-1 and R-2 neighborhoods that have been ravaging their lives. After an extensive investigation by 19 impartial Grand Jurors, they concluded that the city has, in fact, failed to protect its residents by not enforcing its residential neighborhood zoning laws. Not only did the jurors perform extensive research, review records, and conduct interviews, but they also witnessed first hand the extremely disturbing large fraternity parties that occur in several residential neighborhoods adjacent to Cal Poly each weekend. That's more than anyone from the city has done. Each council member has been sent videos demonstrating the extreme disruptions from the unabated fraternity parties in the Alta Vista and Monterey Heights neighborhoods. Each council member has been invited to visit residents' homes on the weekends during the academic year to see first-hand what they have to endure but not one has taken up the invitation. Resident groups have met with council members and code enforcement officials only to hear the same excuses: insufficient staff and there's no money to hire more code enforcement personnel. This inaction has caused the problem only to get worse making these affected neighborhoods nearly unlivable as the Grand Jury concluded. Staff points out that noise complaints have been reduced since 2010 (a period of over FIFTEEN years), but what they fail to mention is that those numbers have remained at a nearly stagnant level for the past 10 years (hovering between 1400 and 1500). Many long-term residents have given up calling the police when little to nothing is done to stop the parties, resulting in many taking the drastic measure of moving away from their long-term homes, causing even more homes in those neighborhoods to turn into student rentals. This could be a contributing factor in the reduction of noise complaints. The city's efforts of having “meetings” with Cal Poly have proven to be futile since nothing ever comes out of those meetings that resolves the problems. The Civility Report Staff mentions was an effort completed YEARS ago and the fraternities operating illegally in R-1 and R-2 zones is a more recent occurrence not even considered in that endeavor. Staff also mentions the efforts of SCLC as a method of helping to resolve town/gown issues. I was RQN's representative on SCLC for five years until the pandemic. Unfortunately, since then, the mission statement of the committee has changed (instigated by Cal Poly with concurrence by the city), resulting in a chilling effect for residents in bringing up problems in neighborhoods impacted by student rentals. Thus, there's little to no coordinated effort to actually deal with the illegal fraternity operations causing neighborhood problems in that committee. It has become an exchange of information group with little to no conversations on how to solve town/gown problems. Additionally, over city staff's objections, Cal Poly is purposely violating AB 524 by erasing previously provided street addresses where their fraternities are operating while claiming they're acting within the law. It appears, however, there have been no efforts made by the city to adjudicate this dispute. Further, the city should be making Cal Poly accountable for inviting new fraternities without providing accommodation for them. Cal Poly should not be sanctioning fraternity parties without Staff or Cal Poly PD doing any on-site monitoring for noise or other infractions to protect neighborhood residents from the mayhem they've been experiencing from these sanctioned parties and events. Therefore, if you feel you must form an ad hoc committee to respond to the Grand Jury Report, please focus your response on how the city is going to do better to resolve the problem of fraternities illegally operating in R-1 and R-2 zones. Perhaps your response could include that (1) the city is going to form a task force comprised of city staff and residents negatively affected by these illegal operations (with the addition of Cal Poly sometime during the process), in an attempt to begin actually doing som ething concrete to address the violation of our zoning codes by Cal Poly fraternities that are destroying residents' quality of life in neighborhoods; (2) the city will fund an additional code enforcement official 65 to exclusively deal with the fraternity zoning code violations and relieve the neighborhoods from these illegal operations; (3) the city intends to adjudicate the actions of Cal Poly removing street addresses of their fraternity operations from their reporting required under AB 524. These responses would be effective in demonstrating a genuine plan of action to help residents negatively affected by the ever- increasing population of Cal Poly students and fraternity operations in our once peaceful family neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Carolyn Smith SLO City Resident 66 From:Colunga-Lopez, Andrea Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 11:25 AM To:kathie walker Cc:CityClerk Subject:RE: Ad Hoc Committee (Item 8a.) and clarification of "Background" provided in the agenda Hi Kathie, Thank you for your additional input, it has been sent to the City Council members. It is now placed in the public archive for the upcoming meeting. Best, Andrea Colunga-Lopez pronouns she/her/hers Administrative Assistant II City Administration E AColunga@slocity.org T 805.781.7105 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: kathie walker < Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2025 12:58 PM To: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: Ad Hoc Committee (Item 8a.) and clarification of "Background" provided in the agenda Dear City Councilmembers, I have been closely following the City Council and policy decisions in San Luis Obispo for over a decade and have a good understanding of the historical context of several issues. There is value in understanding that history. When there is turnover in City leadership and new Councilmembers are elected, or new staff leadership is hired, they usually do not fully understand the complexities of the background that led to certain policies. Jan Marx is the most knowledgeable about the subject investigated by the Grand Jury. I have watched her input be dismissed at times, despite her expertise in these issues, which is unfortunate. When it comes to noise in the Alta Vista neighborhood, Ms. Marx lived it firsthand. It got worse after she moved away, and a lot more illegal fraternities moved into the neighborhood, but she is the most experienced person on the Council and is familiar with the relevant issues. Ms. Marx should be on the Ad Hoc Committee to respond to the Grand Jury. It appears that the mayor must comment according to California Penal Code 933. It’s not clear whether that means she would also be on the Ad Hoc committee. If so, she would be an asset. 67 Otherwise, I recommend that the second member of the Ad Hoc Committee be Emily Francis or Mike Boswell. I feel that Jan’s input should be considered for who she feels would be the best fit to work together for this important role. Some of my reasons for not including Michelle Shoresman are included in the correspondence below. This is nothing personal against Michelle, and I think she is a nice person. However, she has failed to recognize the issue, has not supported Jan Marx’s attempt to have the item agendized (Erica Stewart did support the idea), has minimized the failure of the City, including Code Enforcement, to respond to complaints, among several other things that seems to indicate she is more aligned with City staff and Cal Poly than concerned about the constituents who elected her to represent them. The Council agenda for July 15, 2025, item 8a, lists the “Background” of the City’s efforts toward “neighborhood wellness”. Some of the information provided on the agenda is false. I want to provide the correct information so that the misinformation can be corrected. Also, I hope that you focus on the core issues that are relevant to the CURRENT situation by acknowledging the ext ent to which it exists. Programs and Policies The Background in the agenda says, “many of the approaches have been intended to address the neighborhood impacts of excessive noise from gatherings,” and lists various programs and policies. We have lived in the neighborhood since the inception of these programs and policies, and can unequivocally tell you that despite each of the listed items, the noise exponentially increased in the Fall of 2021. This correlates to the significant increase i n illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood. Several fraternities moved near our home in 2021, and many were the Main Chapter houses of Cal Poly's fraternities. Even more moved in in the Fall of 2022, including one right next door and another directly across the street from our home. More were established in 2023, also near our home on Kentucky and Stafford (496 Kentucky and 1350 Stafford) and on Stafford (1271, 1273, and 1275 Stafford). And even more were added nearby in 2024, including 1276 Bond. That does not include the dozens of others, which I will not list here, but I have previously provided the addresses. Each of them held fraternity-related events throughout the year, including rush events and sorority exchanges. The increased noise level in the Fall of 2021 was documented by first-hand accounts of long-term residents in several “neighborhood group” email exchanges. That’s when I started sending videos of fraternity parties to the City because loud parties at illegal fraternities that could be heard from a block away were being cleared by SLOPD as a negative violation or unable to locate. Prior to the Fall of 2021, I had never contacted SLOPD about noisy parties because they were not such a huge issue as they were beginning in the Fall of 2021. I never had any correspondence with SLOPD Chief Cantrell or Chief Linden whatsoever, because it was not necessary. I only sent one email to Chief Gessell related to the ongoing fireworks set off on Stafford at the rugby house, next to Sid and Isabel Marques. He was responsive and respectful and went to the house with the Fire Marshall. There was never another fireworks incident from that property. But since the Fall of 2021, the noise from the illegal fraternities has gotten progressively worse each year, and most of the long- term residents on the original email chain have left the neighborhood. I have corresponded with SLOPD leadership many, many times since then without resolution. It has been enormously frustrating. The issues have also been brought up in public forums such as the City Council and the SCLC, and the pushback and dishonesty from Police Chief Scott have been especially disheartening. Civility Report The City references the “Neighborhood Wellness Community Civility Working Group,” which worked on a plan for a couple of years to promote neighborhood wellness and produced a 90-page Final Report published in Spring 2015. There were six objectives in the Final Report. I have attached a condensed version, which was attached to a City Council Agenda on 12/1/2025, when the Council recommended expanding the SCLC to include two more residents who were “most directly involved with neighborhood wellness.” The Chair of the Alta Vista Neighborhood Association (AVNA), Karen Adler, was one of two people on the working group to address Objective One. She is still the Chair of AVNA, and her home is also now surrounded by illegal fraternities. She has expressed her extreme displeasure with the lack of enforcement by the City of illegal fraternity houses in our neighborhood. It is ridiculous for the City to continue to minimize the problem and not take meaningful action to fix it. 68 Below are the six objectives from the Civility Report. None of the recommendations for Objective One, shown below, are currently implemented: I am fairly certain that none of the recommendations in Objective Two related to neighborhood wellness are currently implemented, except maybe the City sends information to college students about trash collection. 69 Of all the recommendations listed in Objective Three, the only item that I know is currently implemented is the party registr ation program. It should be noted that RQN opposed that policy when it was adopted and is still opposed to the program. When a party is registered, SLOPD does not respond, and the reporting party is told to call back in 20 minutes if the party is still going. Fraternities were registering parties with over 100 people, and the nearby neighbors were woken by the party, then had to call SLOPD, and there were no consequences. It’s essentially a ‘free pass’ to have a loud party. Also, live bands are sometimes registered, even though they are not allowed by the program, but they get a warning call, and there are no consequences. The neighborhood is still disturbed by the loud music and guests leaving after the party is broken up, which can last an hour. The SCLC is also listed as a collaborative measure; however, the MOU for SCLC was recently revised to dilute the original pur pose of addressing issues between college students and nearby neighborhoods, and the neighborhood representatives for geographical neighborhoods and member-at-large are now elected rather than appointed by the Neighborhood Associations. Last year, two SCLC members brought up the illegal fraternity issue at every single meeting, and it was never addressed within the SCLC. 70 71 Objective Four mostly relates to law enforcement between Cal Poly and the City. One item related to neighborhood wellness was assigned to SCLC to “change the student culture related to neighborhood wellness”. As discussed, the most significant issue related to noise issues in the neighborhoods near campus, spreading to other neighborhoods in northern SLO, has not been discussed at the SCLC despite being brought up during every meeting. 72 Objective Five has one item, and I am not convinced that the City has “effectively informed the community on matters of neighborhood wellness” in an annual communications plan, especially related to illegal fraternity operations, which are the largest negative impact on affected neighborhoods. Objective Six is solely about SCLC. The action item of shifting memberships “to directly involve those individuals most directly involved in neighborhood wellness” is not currently happening. Aside from one RQN representative, there are only two 'neighborhood representatives', including the neighborhood-at-large representative, Abe Lincoln. He does not live in an affected neighborhood, does not belong to any group related to neighborhood wellness, and has criticized other representatives and community members for bringing up problems with noise and the illegal fraternity operations in the neighborhoods. Abe is a nice guy, but does not meet the qualifications intended for the seat he is occupying, and the proposed representative by the 73 Neighborhood Groups was rejected, even though they did meet the qualifications of the seat, and the MOU said that the Neighborhood Groups shall appoint that member. The perspective from neighborhoods most directly involved with noise is extremely diluted by the larger membership of Cal Poly and City representatives. The other two action items of an annual report and a town hall are not currently implemented. The SCLC meetings are subject to the Brown Act, but are not recorded and archived for the public, but they should be. Cal Poly Did Not Enforce the Zoning Ordinance When It Knew of the Illegal Fraternities in 2015 The City Council, City Manager, and other leadership knew about the small number of illegal fraternities on Hathway Avenue in 2015 because after the roof collapse on St. Fratty’s Day that year, Cal Poly hired an independent agency to investigate the incident. The report cited fraternities at 348 Hathway and “others” also on Hathway. That report was presented to the City Council and is included in an Agenda in 2015. SLOPD has also been aware of the illegal fraternity houses on Hathway since that time. Christine Wallace has said that the police department was very familiar with the identified Greek houses on Hathway dating back many years. Nonetheless, the City failed to enforce the zoning regulations in 2015 and set the stage for an explosion of more illegal fra ternity houses moving into the neighborhood. The fraternity members probably thought it was legal for them to operate because the City never took any proactive measures to stop their operations. Today, there are over 40 illegal fraternities in Alta Vista, and several others in Monterey Heights. There are also some west of Santa Rosa/Hwy 1. Cal Poly and Its Fraternities are Intentionally Breaking the Law For the past two academic years, Cal Poly administration, Greek Life staff, and IFC leadership have known it is not legal for them to operate in R1/R2 neighborhoods, but they have ignored the City’s laws. They host rush events to recruit new members and regularly hold blow-out fraternity events at their illegal fraternities in residential neighborhoods. We know these events are “fraternity-related” because they follow certain protocols, as required by Cal Poly Greek Life’s Event Registration Policy. Some indicators are fraternity member 'guards' at the front door wearing construction vests or shirts that say “security”, and they check in guests with laptops. I am certain that SLOPD is also familiar with these practices. The guests that go to the parties are 90% female and often are dressed in similar colors or themes, which indicates they are "exchanges" and registered beforehand with Cal Poly. The fraternities also post photos of events on Instagram at the illegal fraternity houses, whose 74 addresses have been previously documented by the City and which have identifiable features on their homes that are seen in the photos. Most of the Main Chapter Houses for Cal Poly’s 19 fraternities are in R1/R2 neighborhoods. Decrease in Noise vs. Increase in Illegal Fraternities The Background in the agenda cites a 45% decrease in noise complaints to SLOPD since 2010. This argument is a red herring to divert attention from the current issue and attempts to distract from the fact that the problem is ongoing and unresolved in the neighborhoods in the northern part of SLO, which is the subject of the Grand Jury’s report. In 2010, there were not 50+ illegal fraternity houses, and the noise complaints to SLOPD did not regularly include parties of 100-300 people in single-family neighborhoods, as they do today! Context matters. Some weekends, nearly 50% of all noise calls citywide are from fraternities, mostly illegally operating in the single-family neighborhoods. Also, many of the long-term residents have moved from these neighborhoods because they could not tolerate the noise from these illegal fraternity operations. It is disingenuous to minimize the immense problem that the residents of these neighborhoods endure every weekend that Cal Poly is in session, which was witnessed firsthand by the members of the Grand Jury. The City should admit there’s a problem, accept the recommendations, and move forward. Let’s work to solve the issue and hold those who are responsible accountable so the people who live in the neighborhoods can have the quiet enjoyment of their homes. DACs & Citations Are Usually Not Accurate When a DAC or noise citation is issued, the number of guests at a party is self-reported to SNAP or SLOPD by the person receiving the DAC or noise citation. For example, Delta Upsilon has an illegal fraternity house at 281 Albert Drive, and they hosted a concert there in May 2025. There were HUNDREDS of people in the backyard. You can see the party in a 1-minute video on their Instagram page here: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJXia7Uh8kO/?img_index=1 or here: https://vimeo.com/1094575248?share=copy#t=0 I SLOPD issued a noise citation to a Delta Upsilon fraternity member at 281 Albert Drive, and the citation said there were 50 people at that concert/party when there were actually at least 300 people. Law enforcement does not enter yards or count people. They ask the person getting the citation how many people are at the event, so the number on the citation is often not accurate, as people will say there is a lower number than the actual number of guests. It also does not reflect the impact of the event on the neighborhood. If the City is using this “data,” just know that it is self-reported by the offender and is not necessarily accurate. One other important point is that parties like the one shown in the video are common in the neighborhood and are rarely cited as unruly gatherings. There are parties that meet the legal standard of unruly gatherings every weekend that Cal Poly is in session, but very few are cited as unruly gatherings. Sometimes, SNAP responds to documented illegal fraternity houses that received letters from Code Enforcement, so a citation can’t even be issued unless SNAP calls SLOPD, but they usually don’t. If SLOPD were to cite these parties as unruly gatherings (which they are, according to the SLOMC), it would likely make an impact to stop them from continuing. Street Closure During St. Fratty’s Day 2022 In the agenda for 7/15/2025, the City claims, “It was not until 2023 that any extended street closure occurred in response to the party…” That is false. The neighborhood streets were barricaded by SLOPD in 2022 when about 2,000 people overtook the streets near our home. On March 12, 2022, St. Fratty’s Day, we were woken by fireworks at 4 a.m. Loud music was coming from MANY houses in the neighborhood because the party was pre-planned, according to many social media posts made on Friday, March 11, 2022, that talked about the St. Fratty’s Day party on Hathway in the early morning hours the next day. By 6 a.m., the intersection at Bond and Hathway was completely overtaken by the illegal street party, and people spanned from Fredericks to Carpenter and up Bond toward Kentucky Street. It was still dark outside, and I took a video of the crowd with my phone. 75 By around 7 a.m., SLOPD officers had blocked off the neighborhood with their vehicles. SLOPD had barricaded Hathway Avenue from Fredericks Street to Carpenter, and Bond Street was barricaded from Hathway Avenue to Kentucky Street. Officers at Fredericks and Hathway told me they had called their supervisor to the scene. I sent a timeline to the City Council of the SLOPD log from that morning to show the number of calls to our neighborhood. Some calls went unanswered for hours because there were not enough officers on duty to respond. Two of the calls I made to SLOPD did not even show up on the police log, including for a party at 348 Hathway, where many people were partying on the roof. It was one of the worst offenders that morning, and there was no response from SLOPD. My neighbor on Hathway also told me he called SLOPD, and his call was not listed. The log is attached to this email. Michelle Shoresman’s response to my email seemed to indicate that my “standards” were not realistic and that SLOPD had adequately handled the matter: “Thanks for the call log. I know you are frustrated and probably don’t think it’s sufficient, but I do happen to note that there are a large number of citations that were made, and even several arrests. I would think this is likely an improvement over past years, even if not still “enough” by your standards.” The truth is that the response in 2022 was not an improvement over past years because our neighborhood was not overtaken by thousands of people for an illegal street party before or after St. Fratty’s Day 2015, when a roof collapsed and ended the party by 6:30 a.m. In any event, the neighborhood streets were barricaded by SLOPD during St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, so hopefully the record is corrected. SLOPD Chief Rick Scott’s Statements to the Council Were Not True Since 2022, the SLOPD Chief Rick Scott has often falsely claimed that this event was “historically” large, as though it had happened in previous years after the roof collapse, but that is not true. We have lived in the neighborhood since St. Fratty’s Day was “founded” in 2009 by a fraternity at 348 Hathway Ave. It was not a street party until 2015, when the roof collapsed at around 6:15 a.m. It seems the Police Chief makes blanket statements, as though there have been illegal street parties during St. Fratty’s Day all along, to deflect the responsibility that, under his leadership, the neighborhood was taken over by thousands of people in 2022, 2023, and 2024. At a Council meeting on 3/15/2022, after St. Fratty’s Day, Chief Scott debriefed the Council: “We have been planning for St. Patrick’s Day for some time now…” and he minimized the magnitude of the event. He said it took “a couple of hours to get the situation under control,” when it actually lasted almost 6 hours, beginning at 4 a.m. He claimed SLOPD was “staffed up” for the event, anticipating crowds similar to numbers before the COVID-19 shutdown. SLOPD did not have additional staff that morning, and Deputy Chief Mickel explained that they were lucky that it happened near shift change, so they could hold over the night officers as the day officers came on duty. (DC Mickel was honest and transparent about the situation, and we appreciate him very much.) St. Fratty’s Day reemerged in 2022 and progressively got worse until it was finally stopped in 2025. The Grand Jury was corre ct in its finding that the event was not handled appropriately in 2022, 2023, and 2024 because SLOPD did not have enough staff to adequately handle the event. DC Mickel admitted that SLOPD was not prepared in 2023 during an RQN meeting. He also referenced the mistakes and failure of SLOPD to fully prepare in previous years (2022-2024) during his presentation to the Council on SLOPD’s plans for 2025. Council Meeting on March 15, 2022, after St. Fratty’s Day 2022 (before St. Patrick’s Day on March 17) During the Council meeting on 3/15/2022, Jan Marx asked that the Council agendize St. Fratty’s Day for discussion. While Erica Stewart supported a future conversation on an agenda, Michelle Shoresman did not support Ms. Marx’s suggestion. Ms. Shoresman said she didn’t want to agendize discussion on the expansion of the Safety Enhancement Zone to include St. Fratty’s Day and said “putting it in the bike rack” would work best for her. 76 It was disappointing that Ms. Shoresman did not give credit to Ms. Marx’s first-hand experience with the event and did not support even a discussion of the matter on a future agenda. Carlyn Christianson was also adamant in not agendizing the item, saying the trend was downwards and was of no concern. Emily Francis and Mike Boswell were not on the City Council then. Warning Before St. Fratty’s 2023 That Was Ignored and SLOPD Was Not Prepared St. Fratty’s Day is typically held on the Saturday before winter finals, and not necessarily the Saturday before St. Patrick’s Day. The event is centered around finals because many students leave town during the week of finals, and the students want to par ty while most are still in town. This should be noted for future years, since Cal Poly is converting to a semester system. In July 2022, I warned the City and SLOPD about St. Patrick’s Day and St. Fratty’s Day occurring on Friday/Saturday on the same weekend in 2023 and sent the graphic below to show the perfect-storm scenario that would likely result in an expansion and surge of partiers for St. Fratty’s Day. I thought that the failure to have an aggressive plan would result in legitimizing the event, which would cause the event to continue to gain traction and grow. Looking back, I believe the failure of SLOPD to have an adequate plan in 2023 set in motion the exponential growth of the event the following year. At that point, in 2024, it was too late for a Safety Enhancement Zone to have any meaningful effect. St. Fratty’s Day 2023 During the morning of St. Fratty’s Day 2023, SLOPD was not prepared for the incredibly large crowd of 3,000-4,000 people that showed up. You can watch a video from the event here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYkaOsCwBbA Again, during his debrief to the City Council after the event, Chief Scott did not admit that SLOPD was understaffed and caught off guard by a larger crowd than expected. He told the Council that it “wasn’t unexpected” that 3,000-4,000 people showed up in the neighborhood and that SLOPD was “staffed accordingly to address the concerns.” That was not true. He also said there would be an after-action analysis and would have ongoing dialogue with neighbors who live in the affected neighborhood. That also did not happen. He also said there would be an after-action report brought back to the Council, and Emily Francis asked about the timeline for the after-action report, but Chief Scott was evasive and did not have a timeline. Erica also asked about the after-action report. In fact, there was never an after-action report brought back to the Council for the public to hear. It was obvious to observers of St. Fratty’s Day 2023 that SLOPD was unprepared to handle the event. Videos of the event also show dangerous, illegal behavior that morning. EMS could not navigate the crowd. Dozens of people climbed utility poles. People were openly carrying and drinking alcohol. SLOPD officers stood around the perimeter and observed. Later, DC Fred 77 Mickel admitted on a couple of occasions that SLOPD was understaffed during the St. Fratty’s Day events before 2025 because they did not anticipate the number of people who showed up in the neighborhood. The ”Background” information provided in the Agenda further states: “As the crowds in 2024 grew even larger, the City’s departmental staffing became no longer sufficient to safely address and disperse the crowds gathered in the streets and properties near campus…” This implies that the staffing was sufficient in 2022 and 2023, which it was not. The Grand Jury investigated the City’s response from 2022 to 2024 and found that it was not sufficient, and the finding was correct. When someone (or an agency) is not honest about one thing, it makes people question their honesty about other things and hurts their overall credibility. The City should accept responsibility for the mistakes and celebrate the successes and lessons learned. Failing to take responsibility and making excuses makes the city look dishonest and erodes public confidence. Code Enforcement Failed to Investigate Complaints I sent an email to the Council and Community Development citing complaints I filed before fraternity rush events that were advertised on social media with specific dates, times, and addresses of the upcoming events. The fraternities held those events at the exact date, time, and address listed in my complaint, and none of them were cited by Code Enforcement. Michelle Shoresman said in an email that "the city can’t have eyes and ears everywhere", which seemed to excuse the City’s lack of enforcement. Her response was disheartening. Code Enforcement has continued to dismiss complaints of fraternity events at illegal fraternities in our neighborhood as unfounded, even when they are posted on the fraternity’s social media pages and we observe them happening. I’ve asked SLOPD for help to document the event as a fraternity-related event, and to cite it under the applicable code of illegal land use, but SLOPD leadership said they don’t handle that type of report and referred me to Code Enforcement. It's been a circular exercise that has not brought results, and the illegal fraternities continue to operate. The Grand Jury Findings During the City Council meeting in February 2025, DC Mickel gave the presentation for the plans for St. Fratty’s/St. Patrick’s Day 2025, he said SLOPD was reactive during previous years but had learned from their mistakes. Members of the Grand Jury were in the audience. The Jurors also had links to the Police Chief’s previous statements before and after St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, 2023 and 2024; recordings of the SCLC meetings where the Chief also made conflicting statements and Mila’s and Brett’s concerns were continually ignored and even criticized by other members of SCLC; and videos of St. Fratty’s Day in 2022, 2023, and 2024. They also had information about SLOPD policies and procedures, and statements made by two officers related to their response to noisy parties, which likely would not have been known to Christine Wallace. This may be why interviews with two police officers were requested by the Grand Jury, which was blocked by SLOPD, according to the Grand Jury report. The City also claims to have provided documentation, as requested by the Jurors. The findings in the Grand Jury report were based on everything that was provided to them and their observations of the neighborhood during weekends, over at least six months. The City had an ample opportunity to give them all the relevant information throughout the investigation. The City did not “fully cooperate” with the Grand Jury. The report says that the investigation was hampered because the Grand Jury was blocked from interviewing two police officers, despite repeated requests for interviews. The Jurors wanted answers relevant to some specific issues they were investigating that may not have been clear to the City, and it was not appropriate for the City to presume the Grand Jury did not need the testimony. I included the names of two officers in my complaint, and it was related to policy decisions and operations within SLOPD that would likely not be known to Christine Wallace, so that may have been the information they were seeking. The City claimed it would have taken up valuable time from the officers’ schedules, which is ludicrous. SLOPD leadership and officers sit in the audience during Council meetings and Planning Commission meetings, in case there are questions. They certainly had an hour to sit for an interview with the Grand Jury. It is disappointing that SLOPD did not fully cooperate with the Grand Jury, and two officers were prevented from testifying. 78 Beginning on Monday, June 16, 2025, there was a huge surge in activity on my husband's website HowToRuinANeighborhood.com, as multiple people origninating from SLO City (probably staff) went onto the website to search through all the tabs for information, presumably to prepare the response to the Grand Jury by June 20, 2025. I'm not sure what they were looking for, but the website contains video and other documentation related to the issues that were investigated by the Grand Jury. I am not sure if the Grand Jury even looked at the website. Finally, it is obvious that I have been invested in solving this problem for several years and have put my heart and soul into finding solutions. The reason I have made these efforts is because I DEEPLY love my home and property, with our beautiful view of Cerro San Luis from our kitchen and back deck, gardens we’ve cultivated over many years, and an ADU that was to provide income so we could retire. We did not want to be displaced and thought my efforts would result in enforcement and allow my husband and me to stay in our home. I felt as though I was fighting for our lives. When the City did not respond to help solve the issue, I went to the news, and they covered the story. Even the Editorial Board subsequently wrote an Editorial, urging the City to take action, but it has not. The story was picked up by the Daily Mail, and many people contacted us, including legitimate production companies who wanted to film a documentary about the issue. We did not want that sort of publicity and hoped the problem would be solved by the City. We also wrote to the Grand Jury, and they investigated the matter. The Grand Jury report gave us hope, but that was lost when we read the City's 27-page response. We gave up and decided to use our entire life savings for a down payment on a house in a quiet neighborhood, and needed co-signers to qualify for the payments. We do not have any retirement and will now try to get by month-to-month, with payments that exceed 70% of our income. Meanwhile, we, and others in the affected neighborhoods, have been damaged by the inaction of the City for several years. The City should own up to that. Please appoint Jan Marx and Emily Francis (or Mike Boswell) to the Ad Hoc Committee. The public deserves to provide input on this important issue. Thank you, Kathie Walker 12-01-2015 Item 14 - Action for Civility Report Recommendations.pdf