HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7a. REVIEW A TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION TO REMOVE ONE (1) MONTEREY PINE LOCATED AT 2333 MEADOW ST (TREE-0408-2026)
TREE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE REMOVAL OF ONE (1) MONTEREY PINE AT 2333
MEADOW ST (MEADOW PARK)
APPLICATION NO.: TREE-0408-2026
FROM: Walter Gault, Urban Forestry Program Coordinator / City Arborist
Phone Number: (805) 781-7578
Email: wgault@slocity.org
RECOMMENDATION
Review the proposed tree removal application for consistency with the Municipal Code
Section 12.24.090(E) and provide a recommendation to the Community Development
Director.
1.0 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION
The City of San Luis Obispo, the property owner and applicant, has requested the removal
of one (1) 26-inch Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Pinus radiata (Monterey pine) located
within Meadow Park adjacent to the parking lot at 2333 Meadow St reet. (Attachment A,
Tree Removal Application Form). The City is proposing to replace a curb ramp which
requires the removal and replacement of an existing concrete retaining wall (Attachment
Meeting Date: 7/27/2026
Item Number: 7a
Time Estimate: 30
Figure 1: Location of tree removal request.
Page 11 of 33
Item 7a
B, Site and Improvement Plan). This work will extend, at a minimum, 1.5 feet beyond the
final improvements of the retaining wall and within the critical root zone of the tree
requested for removal. The applicant has provided a tree protection plan for all trees
impacted by the project proposal (Attachment C, Tree Protection Plan) and has proposed
replacing it with two (2) compensatory trees (Attachment D, Replanting Plan).
Figure 2: View of tree from Meadow St. (September 2025). The
ramp and retaining wall to be improved are on the right side
(outlined by the dashed lines). Impacts will extend a minimum
of 1.5 feet into the turf.
Page 12 of 33
Item 7a
1.1 City Arborist Analysis
The assessment of the tree in the Tree Protection Plan (Attachment B) states that the
tree could likely be retained and protected during the project. However, the report also
noted that the tree is in decline and that there are symptoms of Fusarium circinatum (pine
pitch canker), a disease commonly associated with Dendroctonus valens (red turpentine
beetle). While no beetle activity was observed on the tree , other nearby P. radiata have
advanced D. valens infestations and are either dying or dead. The proposed infrastructure
improvements are expected to impact the prominent surface ro ots located along/near the
concrete retaining wall and could have significant negative impacts on the tree due to its
maturity, condition, and species (Attachment E, Tree Impact Exhibit). Taken all together,
staff recommended that the tree be requested for removal.
2.0 COMMITTEE PURVIEW
The Tree Committee’s role is to review the removal request in accordance with the
process set forth in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC) Chapter 12.24, specifically
Section 12.24.090(F)(2) - tree removals related to ministerial development permits on
parcels other than R-1 or R-2. This code section utilizes the relevant additional application
requirements in subsection (D)(2) and the criteria set forth in subsection (G).
3.0 TREE REGULATIONS
The City’s Tree Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 12.24) was adopted with the purpose
of establishing a comprehensive program for installing, maintaining, and preserving trees
within the City. This ordinance establishes policies, regulations, a nd specifications
necessary to govern installation, maintenance, removal, and preservation of trees to
beautify the city; to purify the air; to provide shade and wind protection; to add
environmental and economic value; and to preserve trees with historic or unusual value.
Criteria for Construction Related Tree Removal Applications.
SLOMC §12.24.090 subsection (F)(3) requires review by the Tree Committee using the
criteria set forth in SLOMC §12.24.090(G). Applicable criteria are provided in italics belo w
and followed by a description of the proposed tree removals as it relates to that criterion.
(G)(1). Size of Tree. The scale of the tree shall be considered, as well as the size
of the tree’s canopy. Larger, more visually prominent trees may have a high er
preservation priority than smaller, less visually prominent trees.
The tree proposed for removal is large and visually prominent in the neighborhood.
(G)(2). Location of Tree on Private Property. The location of the tree on private
property shall be considered. Trees located in a private rear yard, which are not
highly visible from the public right-of-way, may have a lower preservation priority
than trees with a high visual impact to the neighborhood.
The tree proposed for removal is highly visible from the public right-of-way and
does have a high visual impact on the neighborhood.
Page 13 of 33
Item 7a
(G)(3). Species of Tree. Native trees shall have a higher preservation priority than
non-native trees.
The tree proposed for removal is non-native.
(G)(4). Forestry Best Practice. The number of healthy trees that a given parcel of
land will support shall be considered, and whether removal would enhance the
health or survival of remaining trees. Applications that increase biodiversity of
native trees and tree age distribution within a given area are preferred.
The removal has little to no impact on remaining trees, but the replanting plan
would increase the tree-age diversity in the neighborhood.
(G)(6). Compliance with Subsection J of This Section Regarding Compensatory
Plantings. The approving authority may consider an application proposal to provide
compensatory plantings in excess of required minimums in evaluating this
criterion.
The applicant is proposing to exceed the minimum required replanting rate of 1:1
onsite with two (2) compensatory trees.
(G)(7). Heritage Trees. Heritage trees have the highest preservation priority.
The tree is not a heritage tree.
4.0 ACTIONS
4.1 Recommend findings of consistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending approval of the proposed tree removals based on consistency
will be forwarded to the Community Development Director for final action. This
action may include recommendations regarding the compensatory replanting
plan with size and species of tree.
4.2 Recommend findings of inconsistency with the Tree Regulations. An action
recommending denial of the proposed tree removals should include findings
that cite the basis for denial and should reference inconsistency with the
General Plan, Tree Regulations, or other policy documents.
4.3 Continue the project to a hearing date certain, or uncertain. An action
continuing the review of the proposed tree removals should include direction to
the applicant and staff on pertinent issues.
5.0 ATTACHMENTS
A - Tree Removal Application Form (2333 Meadow St.)
B - Site and Improvement Plan (2333 Meadow St.)
C - Tree Protection Plan (2333 Meadow St.)
D - Replanting Plan (2333 Meadow St.)
E - Tree Impact Exhibit (2333 Meadow St.)
Page 14 of 33
City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401-3218, 805.781.7170, slocity.org
TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION
For all Non-Construction and Construction related tree removals
Owner Name: Applicant Name:
Address: Address:
City: Zip: City: Zip:
Phone: Phone:
Email: Email:
Address of Tree(s):
Number of trees applying to remove:
Tree Species:
Reason for Removal:
Is this removal a City Tree?YES NO DON’T KNOW Dog in yard? YES NO
Is this associated with a Building Permit or Development Plan? _____ YES _____ NO
If YES, please provide appropriate reference numbers:
Is this property governed by a Homeowners Association(HOA)? YES NO If YES, please provide
HOA Board Approved Meeting minutes authorizing tree removal(s) with your tree removalapplication.
ALL ITEMS BELOW MUST BE INCLUDED TO PROCESS TREE REMOVAL APPLICATIONS
Tree(s) banded with ribbon or duct tape for identification
Site plan drawing or photo of tree site with Tree ID (Tree#1, Tree #2, etc.)
Supporting documentation (repair, receipts, etc.)
Photo log showing damage or reasons for removal
1
Replanting plan2
Arborist Report3
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
FAILURE TO KEEP TREES BANDED MAY RESULT IN A REJECTED APPLICATION.
Include a photo log that clearly shows the trees requested for removal. All tree(s) must be
uniquely identified by a number and a ribbon, or an identifier wrapped around the truck in the
photo and prior to inspection.
Include a replanting plan in accordance with Section 12.24.090(J)of the City’s Municipal
Code. A minimum 1:1 replanting rate is required for plantings onsite, and a minimum 2:1
replanting rate is required for plantings offsite or within the public right-of-way.
An application for tree removal on a site where a discretionary or ministerial development
permit is requested shall include an arborist report and a site plan that includes accurate drip
line delineation and cross sections of construction work impacting both trees proposed for
removal and trees planned to remain.
City of San Luis Obispo Alejandra Celio
990 Palm Street 919 Palm St
San Luis Obispo 93401 San Luis Obispo 93401
805-781-7100 805-783-7865
acelio@slocity.org
2251 Meadow St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
1
Monterey Pine
The tree is declining in health and is exhibiting symptoms of pine pitch canker. The City is proposing to replace a curb
ramp which requires setback of an existing concrete retaining wall. With prominent surface roots near the project site,
any disturbance of its roots will have significant negative impacts due to its condition.
Page 15 of 33
Tree Removal Decisions as outlined in Section 12.24.090 of the City’s Municipal Code
SELECT TYPE OF TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION BEING SUBMITTED DECISION MAKER
Imminent Hazard to Life or Property
SLOMC 12.24.090(E)(1)(a)City Arborist
Tree Health and Hazard Mitigation
SLOMC 12.24.090(E)City Arborist
Convenience Removal
SLOMC 12.24.090(E)(3)
Tree Committee makes recommendation to Community Development Director
Community
Development Director
Minor Ministerial Development Permit
SLOMC 12.24.090(F)(1)
Removal for residential or accessory construction on an R-1 or R-2 lot
City Arborist
Discretionary Permits Construction Tree Removal
SLOMC 12.24.090(F)(3)
Community
Development Director
Major Development / Tentative Tract Map/ Conditional Use Permit
SLOMC 12.24.090(F)(4)Planning Commission
Submittal Instructions
Submit Tree Removal applications to the City of San Luis Obispo, Community Development Department at
the following address: 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 or by email to trees@slocity.org.
Payment of the “Tree Removal Permit” fee shall be submitted along with this application. Refer to the City’s
current Comprehensive Fee Schedule for the current fee.
Property Owner Authorization:
By signing this application, I certify that I have reviewed
this completed application and the attached material
and consent to its filing. I agree to allow the Community
Development Department to duplicate and distribute
submitted materials to interested persons as it
determines is necessary for the processing of the
application.
Signed Date
Applicant/ Representative Certification:
By signing this application, I certify that the information
provided is accurate. I understand the City might not
approve what I’m applying for or might set conditions of
approval. I agree to allow the Community Development
Department to duplicate and distribute submitted
materials to interested persons as it determines is
necessary for processing of the application.
Signed Date
Permission to Access Property:
This section is to be completed by the property owner
and/or occupant who controls access to the property. To
adequately evaluate the submitted proposal,
Community Development Department Staff,
Commissioners and City Council Members will have to
gain access to the exterior of the real property in order
to adequately review and report on the proposed
request. Your signature below certifies that you agree to
give the City permission to access the project site from
8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, as part of the
normal review of this application.
Signed Date
Indemnification Agreement:
The Owner/Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless the City or its agents or officers and
employees from any claim, action or proceeding against
the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack,
set aside, void, or annul, in whole or in part, the City’s
approval of this project. In the event that the City fails to
promptly notify the Owner / Applicant of any such claim,
action or proceeding, or that the City fails to cooperate
fully in the defense of said claim, this condition shall
thereafter be of no further force or effect.
Signed Date
6/29/26 6/29/26
Page 16 of 33
Page 17 of 33
Page 18 of 33
Page 19 of 33
Page 20 of 33
Page 21 of 33
Page 22 of 33
Page 23 of 33
Page 24 of 33
Page 25 of 33
Page 26 of 33
Page 27 of 33
Page 28 of 33
Page 29 of 33
Page 30 of 33
Page 31 of 33
Page 32 of 33
Page 33 of 33