Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPRR26411 Emails1 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Thursday, July 23, 2026 6:49 AM To:Jennifer L. Haft; Terrance Leshae Harris; Jason Mockford; David Edgar Groom; Joy Pederson; Stewart, Erica A; McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott; Scott, Rick; Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:City-CP Neighborhood Meeting Agenda Attachments:2607 Neighborhood Issues Agenda.pdf Good morning: Please see the attached agenda to guide today’s discussion. We look forward to seeing you at 10:30 at City Hall. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow Senior Director of Economic Development Innovation, Industry and Economic Development Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu Neighborhood Relations Leadership Meeting Cal Poly and City of San Luis Obispo SLO City Hall, FIT Conference Room 990 Palm Street Thursday, July 23rd | 10:30 am - 11:30 am Purpose: Cal Poly and the City of San Luis Obispo are committed to working through neighborhood challenges related to student behavior - many affiliated with fraternities and sororities. Intentional leadership meetings focused on this issue began in summer 2025.The City and Cal Poly are collaboratively exploring solutions that protect the well-being of residents, respect students’ rights, and maintain community harmony. Attendees City of SLO Erica A. Stewart, Mayor Whitney McDonald, City Manager Scott Collins, Assistant City Manager Rick Scott, Chief of Police Timmi Tway, Community Development Director Cal Poly Jen Haft, Chief of Staff Terrance Harris, Vice President, Student Affairs and Strategic Enrollment Management Joy Pedersen, Assistant Vice President, Student Affairs and Dean of Students David Groom, Senior Associate Dean of Students Jason Mockford, Senior Director, Leadership and Service Courtney Kienow, Senior Director, Economic Development Agenda • Welcome and Meeting Objectives • Confirm shared goals and desired outcomes for today's discussion. • City of San Luis Obispo Update • Overview of City Council direction regarding code enforcement. • Progress on actions and initiatives since the previous meeting. • Cal Poly Update • Progress on actions and initiatives since the previous meeting. • Student conduct, education, and accountability efforts. • Discussion • Review current neighborhood challenges. • Explore potential strategies and solutions. • Identify opportunities for coordination between the City and Cal Poly. • Next Steps • Confirm action items 2 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Monday, July 20, 2026 9:02 AM To:Collins, Scott; Hermann, Greg; Dietrick, Christine Subject:Weekly Update Attachments:Diablo Community Event- July 30; SBDC Quarterly Report Q2 2026; FW: HOUSED!!; Cal Poly's Opposition to Motion for Judgment (for event addresses); RE: HRC Resignation; CTC Time Schedule.docx BCC: Mayor and Council Good evening, all. We have a number of items to share with you all at the conclusion of this very full week:   Cal Poly Opposition Papers – Last weekend, we received an email with copies of the opposition brief and supporting declarations filed by Cal Poly in the lawsuit surrounding their compliance with the Public Records Act and the release of fraternity/sorority event addresses. I am forwarding the email and attachments for your information and awareness. The City’s work in investigating events at unpermitted fraternity/sorority houses is identified as a rationale for withholding the addresses from disclosure.  3 ” Thank you, friends! Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4923-4158-7644 v1 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES J. Leah Castella (SBN 205990) E-mail: lcastella@bwslaw.com Alexandra L. Mulhall (SBN 353051) E-mail: amulhall@bwslaw.com Han-Hsien Miletic (SBN 295957) E-mail: hmiletic@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO KATHIE WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Respondent/Defendant. Case No. 26CV-0166 RESPONDENT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Filed concurrently with Opposition to Motion for Judgment; Declarations and Exhibits in Support Thereof Hearing Date: November 4, 2026 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 4 Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Tana L. Coates Department 4 Action Filed:March 18, 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4923-4158-7644 v1 2 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1306 and Evidence Code sections 451, 452, and 453, Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG (together, “Cal Poly”), through its retained counsel, hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the documents listed below in support of its Opposition to the Motion for Judgment. 1. The 2024-2025 AB 524 Annual Report (and associated hyperlinks to Chapter SFL Event Reporting Lists) prepared and published by UC Irvine Sorority & Fraternity Life, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibits 1 and 4 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. Exhibit 1 can also be located at the following webpage: https://sororityfraternity.uci.edu/annual-reports/. Exhibit 4 can also be located at the following webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17WRsg7WEy4Bp- PPS8bHpnoYN6r4uvMMu_bLzadS-H_g/edit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 2. The 2023-2024 AB 524 Annual Report (and associated hyperlinks to Chapter SFL Event Reporting Lists) prepared and published by UC Irvine Sorority & Fraternity Life, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit 2 and 5 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. Exhibit 2 can also be located at the following webpage: https://sororityfraternity.uci.edu/annual-reports/. Exhibit 5 can also be located at the following webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hkbq1zpGbjx1jui0tENixqcJsE70McCivrnmK90YJOM/e dit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 3. The 2022-2023 AB 524 Annual Report (and associated hyperlinks to Chapter SFL Event Reporting Lists) prepared and published by UC Irvine Sorority & Fraternity Life, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit 3 and 6 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. Exhibit 3 can also be located at the following webpage: https://sororityfraternity.uci.edu/annual-reports/. Exhibit 6 can also be located at the following 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4923-4158-7644 v1 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JNfzeeKzPQUccNMDnDSpYG6IQONhHhS0ODVgdaJc mzM/edit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 4. The webpage for the Transparency Act (AB-524) reporting prepared and published by California State University Long Beach (“CSULB”), a true and correct PDF download of which is attached as Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. Exhibit 7 can also be located at the following webpage: https://www.csulb.edu/student- affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 5. The 2023-2024 Fraternity & Sorority Life Annual Engagement Report prepared and published by San Francisco State University, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. Exhibit 8 can also be located at the following webpage: https://activities.sfsu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/SFSU%2023- 24%20_%20AB%20524%20Annual%20Ennual%20Engagement%20Report.pdf. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 6. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act webpage maintained by the Cal Poly Office of the Registrar, located at https://registrar.calpoly.edu/content/stu_info/ferpa, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Han-Hsien Miletic, concurrently filed herewith. This request is made pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivision (h), as a fact not reasonably subject to dispute. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4923-4158-7644 v1 4 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Dated: July 10, 2026 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP By:/s/ Han-Hsien Miletic J. Leah Castella Alexandra L. Mulhall Han-Hsien Miletic Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4923-4158-7644 v1 5 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as RESPONDENT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as DECLARATION OF JASON MOCKFORD IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES J. Leah Castella (SBN 205990) E-mail: lcastella@bwslaw.com Alexandra L. Mulhall (SBN 353051) E-mail: amulhall@bwslaw.com Han-Hsien Miletic (SBN 295957) E-mail: hmiletic@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO KATHIE WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Respondent/Defendant. Case No. 26CV-0166 DECLARATION OF SHARON GALLOWAY IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Filed concurrently with Opposition to Motion for Judgment; Request for Judicial Notice Hearing Date: November 4, 2026 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 4 Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Tana L. Coates Department 4 Action Filed:March 18, 20 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as DECLARATION OF SHARON GALLOWAY IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as DECLARATION OF JENNIFER HAFT IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES J. Leah Castella (SBN 205990) E-mail: lcastella@bwslaw.com Alexandra L. Mulhall (SBN 353051) E-mail: amulhall@bwslaw.com Han-Hsien Miletic (SBN 295957) E-mail: hmiletic@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO KATHIE WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Respondents/Defendants. Case No. 26CV-0166 RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Filed concurrently with Declarations and Exhibits in Support Thereof; Request for Judicial Notice Hearing Date: November 4, 2026 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 4 Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Tana L. Coates Department 4 Action Filed:March 18, 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 2 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................6 STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS ..........................................................................................8 Cal Poly’s Fraternity and Sorority Life Office.......................................................................8 The Fraternity and Sorority Life Event Registration Process ................................................8 Cal Poly’s Publication of AB 524 Reports .............................................................................9 The City’s Targeting of Students for Code Enforcement Actions .......................................10 Petitioner’s PRA Requests ...................................................................................................12 LEGAL STANDARD ......................................................................................................................13 ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................14 I. Cal Poly Properly Withheld Student Residential Addresses Under the CPRA Catchall Exemption ..............................................................................................................14 A. The Privacy Interests at Stake are Significant ..........................................................14 1. DoorList Usage Does Not Waive Student Privacy Rights ...........................15 2. Section 66312 Does Not Compel Disclosure of Residential Addresses .....................................................................................................16 B. Petitioner’s Stated Public Interest Is Attenuated and Speculative ...........................17 C. Petitioner’s Cases Are Distinguishable and the Balancing Test Favors Cal Poly ...........................................................................................................................18 II. Consideration of FERPA Counsels Against Disclosure of Addresses .................................22 A. The FSL Event Registration Records Constitute Education Records Under FERPA .....................................................................................................................22 B. FERPA Considerations in the CPRA Balancing Test Favors Cal Poly ...................23 C. Cal Poly’s Prior Disclosure Practices Do Not Constitute Waiver ...........................24 III. Declaratory Relief Is Not Appropriate.................................................................................25 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 3 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Federal Cases Student Press Law Center v. Alexander (D.D.C. 1991) 778 F.Supp. 1227 ............................................................................................ 22 State Cases American Civil Liberties Union Foundation v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 1032 .............................................................................................................. 22 American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior Court (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 55 ...................................................................................................... 13 Anderson Union High School Dist. v. Shasta Secondary Home School (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 262 ........................................................................................................ 16 BRV, Inc. v. Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 742 .................................................................................................... 22 CBS, Inc. v. Block (1986) 42 Cal.3d 646 ......................................................................................................... 18, 19 City of Gilroy v. Superior Court (2026) 19 Cal.5th 38 ................................................................................................................ 25 City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2017) 2 Cal.5th 608 ................................................................................................................ 14 City of Vallejo v. Superior Court (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 565 .................................................................................................... 14 Clough v. Baber (1940) 38 Cal.App.2d 50 ......................................................................................................... 14 Connell v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 601 ........................................................................................................ 7 County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 475 .................................................................................................... 24 County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 119 .................................................................................................... 13 Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1 .................................................................................................................... 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 4 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Kirwan v. The Diamondback (Md. 1998) 721 A.2d 196 ........................................................................................................23 Lorig v. Medical Board (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 462 ......................................................................................................14 Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School Dist. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1250 ..................................................................................................24 New York Times Company v. Superior Court (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1579 .................................................................................18, 20, 21, 22 Poway Unified School District v. Superior Court (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1496 ....................................................................................................23 People v. Reynoza (2024) 15 Cal.5th 982 ..............................................................................................................16 Sacks v. City of Oakland (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1070 ..................................................................................................13 Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1325.............................................................................................................24 Versaci v. Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 805 ....................................................................................................17 Voice of San Diego v. Superior Court (2021) 66 Cal.App.5th 669 ..........................................................................................20, 21, 24 Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559 ................................................................................................................13 Federal Statutes 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, subd. (a)(4)(A) ...............................................................................................23 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, subd. (a)(5)(B) ............................................................................................... 23 Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C., § 1232g................................................... 7 State Statutes California Public Records Act (“CPRA”) .............................................................................. passim Educ. Code, § 66312 .............................................................................................................. passim Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (a)(3) ................................................................................................. 10 Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (b)(1)(A) ........................................................................................... 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 5 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (b)(1)(A)(ix).....................................................................................16 Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (d)(1) ................................................................................................10 Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (d)(1)(A) ..................................................................................... 10, 16 Educ. Code, § 66312, subd. (d)(3)(B) ........................................................................................... 16 Evid. Code, § 664 .......................................................................................................................... 13 Gov. Code, § 7922.0000........................................................................................................ 6, 7, 14 Gov. Code, § 7923.100.................................................................................................................. 13 Other Authorities Assembly Bill 524 ........................................................................................................................... 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 6 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES INTRODUCTION Cal Poly 1 takes seriously both its obligations under the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”) and its equally important obligations to protect the privacy and safety of its students. Petitioner attempts to characterize this case as one weighing innocuous disclosure of “party addresses” against the intentional flouting of zoning ordinances. This framing is inaccurate. The records at issue contain residential addresses that students are required to provide to Cal Poly prior to holding fraternity and sorority events. Petitioner seeks an order requiring Cal Poly to disclose those residential addresses to the public, notwithstanding the substantial privacy interests implicated by such a disclosure. The CPRA does not compel this result. Rather, the CPRA expressly recognizes that public records may be withheld when “on the facts of the particular case” the public interest served by nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure. (Gov. Code, § 7922.0000.) Petitioner largely ignores the individualized balancing that the statute requires and instead seeks a sweeping declaration requiring disclosure of every residential address contained in every Fraternity and Sorority Life (“FSL”) Event Registration form. That request is fundamentally inconsistent with the CPRA. Petitioner’s arguments also rest on several inaccurate factual premises. First, Petitioner repeatedly portrays the withheld information as merely the addresses of “fraternity parties.” In reality, every withheld address is a residential address. Disclosure therefore implicates privacy interests associated with private residences, not merely locations where events occurred. Second, each FSL Event Registration form is submitted by a student, and when an event takes place at a residence, the student submitting the form is required to provide the address. Although identifying information has been redacted, residential addresses are submitted by 1 For the sake of consistency, Respondents will, similar to Petitioner Kathie Walker (“Petitioner”) use the term “Cal Poly” to refer to either or both, as context requires, California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo (sometimes also referred to as the “University”) and Respondents Board of Trustees of the California State University and Jeffrey Armstrong, in his official capacity as President of the University. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 7 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES individual students in connection with their fraternity or sorority membership. The residential addresses are not voluntarily submitted for public dissemination. The addresses are administrative information; not public event advertisements. The fact that Cal Poly requires submission of residential addresses as part of its internal event registration process does not eliminate students’ reasonable expectations that those addresses will remain confidential absent a legal obligation requiring disclosure—reasonable expectations concerning privacy rights that emanate from the California Constitution and federal laws such as FERPA2. Petitioner’s asserted public interest likewise misses the mark. The purpose of the CPRA is to promote transparency regarding governmental operations, not to transform Cal Poly into a municipal enforcement agency. Whether a particular residence complies with the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is a question entrusted to local government, not to Cal Poly. The CPRA does not require disclosure of otherwise private information simply because disclosure might make municipal code enforcement more convenient. Compelling disclosure of student residential addresses would expose students to potential harassment and targeted enforcement actions, which, in addition to fomenting distrust between students and the University, leads to precisely the type of injury that the CPRA and FERPA are designed to prevent. That the information may serve Petitioner’s personal advocacy goals does not transform it into the type of public accountability record that overcomes these protections. (See Connell v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 601, 616-617 [“What is material is the public interest in disclosure, not the private interest of a requesting party.”].) Finally, Petitioner’s request for declaratory relief underscores why the Petition should be denied. Petitioner repeatedly argues that Cal Poly bears the burden of demonstrating, as to each withheld address, that confidentiality clearly outweighs disclosure. If that is correct—and Cal Poly agrees the balancing inquiry is necessarily fact-specific—then the Court cannot simultaneously issue a blanket declaration requiring disclosure of all such addresses in future cases. The individualized balancing mandated by Government Code section 7922.000 precludes precisely the 2 The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C., § 1232g. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 8 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES sort of categorical relief Petitioner requests. Because the substantial privacy interests associated with student residential addresses outweigh Petitioner’s generalized interest in obtaining those addresses, and because Petitioner’s requested declaratory relief is incompatible with the CPRA’s case-specific balancing requirement, the Petition should be denied. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS Cal Poly’s Fraternity and Sorority Life Office Cal Poly recognizes a community of Greek organizations (fraternities and sororities) that operate under the oversight of the University’s Fraternity and Sorority Life Office (“FSL Office”). (Declaration of Jennifer Haft (“Haft Decl.”), ¶ 3; Declaration of Jason Mockford (“Mockford Decl.”), ¶ 3.) University recognition confers meaningful benefits on these organizations, including the right to use the Cal Poly name, access to university facilities and funding, and participation in university event-scheduling and promotion resources. (Haft Decl., ¶ 4; Mockford Decl., ¶ 4.) In exchange, recognized Greek organizations are subject to university policies that require them to comply with applicable laws and university standards as a condition of maintaining their recognized status. (Haft Decl., ¶ 5; Mockford Decl., ¶ 5.) The Fraternity and Sorority Life Event Registration Process The FSL Office administers this oversight program as part of its broader mission to support student development and organizational accountability. (Declaration of Elizabeth Aiello- Coppola (“Aiello-Coppola Decl.”), ¶ 3.) As part of that mission, since around 2015, the FSL Office has implemented an event registration process under which all events sponsored or endorsed by a recognized Greek organization must be registered with the FSL Office in advance. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 4, Ex. A; Mockford Decl., ¶ 6.) However, registration is not approval, and the FSL Office does not approve (or deny) events. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.) The purpose of the event registration process is to enable the University to ensure that student-organized events comply with university safety policies, including requirements around alcohol management and sober monitors, before those events occur. The ultimate goal is to promote student health and safety, and in particular, to prevent accidents, injuries, or other harms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 9 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES related to overconsumption or underage consumption of alcohol. (Mockford, ¶ 8.) To register an event, a student member of the organization submits a standardized FSL Event Registration form on behalf of the chapter; different versions of the form have existed between 2023 and 2025. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 6, Exs. B, C.) Generally, the form collects the student’s name and contact information, the organization’s name, the event date, time, title, and theme, whether alcohol will be present, and the event location. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 7.) With respect to location, the different versions of the form offered a menu of choices for event location (e.g., on-campus, chapter facility, satellite house, third-party venue, or residence) and required the submitting student to provide the specific address of the event location. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 7.) The practical significance of the location field is straightforward: Cal Poly requires the address of every registered event so that it can later assess, if necessary, whether the event complied with university policies. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 5, 8.) The FSL Office does not collect the addresses for any purpose beyond that administrative review. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 9.) In particular, Cal Poly does not independently investigate whether the submitting student lives at the address provided or whether any student lives at the address provided, does not verify the zoning status of off-campus addresses, and does not maintain the registration records as a database of student residences. Indeed, the post-2024 version of the form includes a reminder to students to independently check zoning requirements if an event is taking place at a residential location. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 10.) All addresses are provided by the student; Cal Poly simply receives and reviews it in the context of the event registration process. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 11.) All completed forms are maintained by the FSL Office. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 12.) Cal Poly’s Publication of AB 524 Reports Assembly Bill 524, which was enacted in 2022 and codified in Education Code section 66312 (“Section 66312”), imposes certain information-collection and public disclosure obligations on California universities with respect to their recognized Greek organizations. (Educ. Code, § 66312.) Among other things, Section 66312 requires universities to condition their recognition of Greek organizations on those organizations’ agreement to annually provide certain information 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 10 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES about their activities, and to publish that information in an annual online report (the “AB 524 Report”). (Educ. Code, § 66312, subds. (b)(1)(A), (d)(1)(A).) Section 66312 specifically requires the AB 524 Report to include the addresses of recognized organizations’ chapter houses (i.e., the houses owned by the university or the organization itself). (Educ. Code, § 66312, subds. (a)(3), (d)(1).) Cal Poly complies with this requirement and discloses chapter house addresses in its AB 524 Reports. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 13.) Cal Poly’s AB 524 Reports have been published annually since October 2023. (Aiello- Coppola Decl., ¶ 14.) Importantly, Section 66312 does not require universities to publicly disclose the addresses of satellite houses or the addresses of individual events hosted at personal residences or third-party venues. (See Educ. Code, § 66312, subds. (a)(3), (d)(1).) Consistent with that framework, since June 18, 2024, Cal Poly has chosen not to publish addresses of satellite houses or residential event locations in its AB 524 Reports. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 15.) Although Cal Poly included some residential addresses in its 2023 report, the University has since reassessed the privacy and legal implications of disclosing residential addresses and revised its reports to remove residential address information that was not strictly required to be disclosed under AB 524. To that end, between June 18, 2024 and July 8, 2024, Cal Poly revised the 2023 report to remove precise street addresses for satellite houses or residential event locations.3 (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 16.) The City’s Targeting of Students for Code Enforcement Actions In recent years, it appears that the City of San Luis Obispo has increased efforts to take action on properties it suspects are operating as unpermitted fraternity or sorority houses. (Haft Decl., ¶ 6; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 17; Mockford Decl., ¶ 9.) While Cal Poly shares the City’s general interest in ensuring that student organizations comply with applicable laws, Cal Poly is equally concerned about the potential chilling effect that the City’s actions may have on students’ willingness to participate in university safety programs, student privacy, and due process. (Haft 3 This decision is in line with the decisions of numerous other California colleges and universities. (Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), Exs. 1-8.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 11 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Decl., ¶¶ 7, 13; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 22, 29; Mockford Decl., ¶¶ 10, 15.) The concern is that public dissemination of private residential addresses where student events took place could further erode students’ willingness to share information with the University if they believe that information is being used beyond the purposes intended resulting in punitive measures against them. (Haft Decl., ¶ 7.) The City has, for example, begun sending emails to Cal Poly administration, documenting alleged violations and requesting that the University impose academic or disciplinary consequences on students based on the City’s own enforcement determinations. (Mockford Decl., ¶ 11.) The University learned from student leaders that on or about September 25, 2025, code enforcement officers attended a semi-private Greek recruitment event on Cal Poly’s campus, representing their visit as educational in nature. (Haft Decl., ¶ 8; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 19.) Information gathered at that event was subsequently used to issue zoning violations to fraternity houses whose addresses appeared on recruitment materials distributed at the event. (Haft Decl., ¶ 8; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 19.) This resulted in numerous conversations with student leaders expressing concern about engaging with City personnel in University settings. (Haft Decl., ¶ 8; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 19.) Students have also reported receiving conflicting guidance from City enforcement staff about whether enforcement is complaint-based or proactive. (Haft Decl., ¶ 9; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 20.) For example, students reported to administrators that numerous notices of violation were posted on student homes during the winter holiday break, even though the alleged violations had occurred months earlier. (Haft Decl., ¶ 10; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 20.) According to the students, the notices indicated that the appeal window had already closed, or would close, before most students returned from break. (Haft Decl., ¶ 10; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 20.) Some notices further suggested that students could challenge a citation if Cal Poly confirmed that no event had occurred, while simultaneously indicating that the university was unlikely to provide that confirmation. (Haft Decl., ¶ 10; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 20.) Student leaders expressed concern with the notices to administrators and sought guidance from the University regarding these 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 12 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES notices. (Haft Decl., ¶ 10; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 20.) The City’s enforcement practices have included use of social media. DoorList, an event management application used by many Greek organizations, serves important safety functions: it helps organizations control entry to events and maintain attendance records that can be critical in emergency situations. (Haft Decl., ¶ 11; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 21; Mockford Decl., ¶ 13.) Students reported to administrators that they had stopped using DoorList based on the belief that the City was using information gleaned from DoorList for enforcement purposes. (Haft Decl., ¶ 11; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 21; Mockford Decl., ¶ 13.) Student leaders from multiple recognized Greek chapters informed administrators that they had received many City-issued citations, and student leaders across the Greek community have consistently expressed uncertainty regarding how to comply with City requirements and concerns about the manner in which enforcement was being conducted. (Haft Decl., ¶ 12; Mockford Decl., ¶ 14.) It is against this backdrop—not the idealized picture of orderly code enforcement that Petitioner presents—that the Court must evaluate whether disclosure of residential student addresses from Cal Poly’s internal records is warranted. Petitioner’s PRA Requests Petitioner is a former resident of a San Luis Obispo neighborhood who, beginning in fall 2021, experienced what she believed to be increased fraternity party activity near her home. (Pet., ¶ 11.) She submitted complaints to the City and, over the course of several years, submitted multiple public records requests to Cal Poly seeking address information from the FSL Event Registration records. (Pet., ¶¶ 11, 35, 41, 49.) Petitioner submitted her first records request in October 2023 and a second in July 2024. (Pet., ¶¶ 35, 41.) Cal Poly declined to produce records in response to those requests. (Pet., ¶¶ 36, 45.) Petitioner submitted a third request in November 2025, seeking the addresses of all fraternity events registered with the FSL Office on and since July 1, 2023. (Pet., ¶ 49, Ex. 13.) In February 2026, Cal Poly produced to Petitioner the FSL Event Registration records responsive to the 2025 Request, covering fraternity-sanctioned events held from 2023 through 2025. (Pet., ¶ 51; Declaration of Sharon Galloway (“Galloway Decl.”), ¶ 5.) There were 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 13 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES approximately 450 records. (Galloway Decl., ¶ 5.) In preparing the records for production, Cal Poly carefully reviewed the FSL Event Registration records responsive to the requests and made targeted, surgical redactions consistent with its legal obligations. (Galloway Decl., ¶ 6.) Specifically, Cal Poly produced the FSL Event Registration records in full, but redacted only the addresses that students identified on the forms as residential locations. (Galloway Decl., ¶¶ 7-8.) Where a student identified the event location as a recognized chapter facility or a third-party venue (in other words, locations that are not personal residences) Cal Poly produced those addresses without redaction. (Galloway Decl., ¶¶ 8-10.) In other words, the only addresses that are redacted from the records that were produced to Petitioner are residential addresses that are not official chapter houses or third-party venues. (Galloway Decl., ¶ 10.) LEGAL STANDARD The CPRA authorizes writ relief only when “certain public records are being improperly withheld,” and for no other reason. (Gov. Code, § 7923.100.) Thus, production remains the core remedy under the CPRA. (See, e.g., County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 119, 127 [CPRA provides no judicial remedy for “any purpose other than to determine whether a particular record or class of records must be disclosed.”]) In assessing whether to issue a writ of mandate, the Court must presume that Cal Poly complied with the law. (Evid. Code, § 664 [“It is presumed that official duty has been regularly performed.”]; American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California v. Superior Court (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 55, 85 [“Government agencies are, of course, entitled to a presumption that they have reasonably and in good faith complied with the obligation to disclose responsive information.”].) The Court must also indulge all reasonable inferences from the evidence that would support the administrative determination and resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of Cal Poly’s decisions. (Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Moreover, Petitioner must prove (1) “a clear, present, and usually ministerial duty to perform,” and (2) “a clear, present, and beneficial right” belonging to Petitioner in the performance of that duty. (Sacks v. City of Oakland (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1070, 1081.) Mandate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 14 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES is thus an extraordinary remedy, and there is no absolute right to a writ. (Clough v. Baber (1940) 38 Cal.App.2d 50, 52.) “The necessity of issuing the writ must be clearly established. It will not issue in doubtful cases.” (Ibid.) ARGUMENT I. Cal Poly Properly Withheld Student Residential Addresses Under the CPRA Catchall Exemption While the CPRA establishes a presumption in favor of disclosure of any record that “relates in any way to the business of the public agency,” that presumption is rebuttable. (City of San Jose v. Superior Court (2017) 2 Cal.5th 608, 616.) An agency satisfies its burden by demonstrating that a specific statutory exemption applies. (Gov. Code, § 7922.000.) Critically, where, as here, the agency asserts that privacy interests outweigh the public interest in disclosure, the court must conduct a careful, fact-specific balancing inquiry. (City of Vallejo v. Superior Court (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 565, 598.) The CPRA’s balancing test requires that the interest in nondisclosure “clearly outweigh” the public interest in disclosure. (Gov. Code, § 7922.000.) A. The Privacy Interests at Stake are Significant Petitioner contends that there are no meaningful privacy interests at stake because the FSL Event Registration records do not link addresses to specific students. This argument understates both the nature of the information and the risks of disclosure. All of the addresses at issue are residential addresses. (Galloway Decl., ¶ 10.) And it is well-established that all individuals, including students, have a substantial privacy interest in their home addresses. (Lorig v. Medical Board (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 462, 468; see also Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 1, 35 [noting that individuals have constitutionally protected interests in “information privacy”].) Moreover, each registration is submitted by an individual Cal Poly student who is affiliated with a fraternity or sorority. (Aiello- Coppola Decl., ¶ 6.) While the University does not ask (and cannot determine) if the student submitting the FSL Event Registration form resides at the address listed on the form, the form nevertheless reveals a direct link between a specific student, a specific fraternity/sorority, and a specific residential address. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 6-10.) Thus, despite Petitioner’s attempt to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 15 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES minimize the privacy interest by referring to these addresses as merely “party addresses,” this case is not simply about disclosure of where a party occurred in the abstract but about disclosure of residential addresses that are submitted by students as part of the University’s oversight of recognized student organizations. Petitioner also repeatedly asserts that the addresses are voluntarily submitted by students, but this is patently incorrect. In completing the FSL Event Registration form, a student is not voluntarily providing a residential address for public dissemination. They submit the addresses because Cal Poly requires the pre-registration of Greek events. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 4-7.) Students who submit FSL Event Registration forms still retain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the residential addresses that are provided.4 1. DoorList Usage Does Not Waive Student Privacy Rights Cal Poly does not dispute that some students have used third-party apps such as DoorList to facilitate fraternity or sorority events. But the fact that some fraternities or sororities have publicized some event addresses through DoorList or social media does not eliminate the privacy interests in the FSL Event Registration records, and Petitioner cites to no authority that even suggests this outcome. In any event, voluntary disclosure by a student organization through a social media post is fundamentally different from compelled disclosure of an official record. A student or organization that chooses to publicize an event retains the ability to limit, retract, or qualify that disclosure. The same cannot be said for compelled government agency disclosure. Even assuming that some student organizations voluntarily publicized some event locations through third-party platforms, that fact does not waive the privacy interests associated with the residential addresses contained in Cal Poly’s records. Indeed, Cal Poly has reason to believe that student leaders of Greek organizations have stopped using apps like DoorList because of privacy concerns. (Haft Decl., ¶ 11; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 21; Mockford Decl., ¶ 13.) Nor does the use of social media by students eliminate the University’s obligation to conduct the 4 It is worth noting that Cal Poly has no way to determine if the student even resides at the submitted residential address. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 16 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES balancing required by the CPRA, a balancing exercise that must also take into consideration student concerns about privacy and safety in light of the City’s code enforcement actions. (Haft Decl., ¶ 6-13; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 17-22; Mockford Decl., ¶¶ 9-15.) The relevant inquiry remains whether, on the facts of this case, the public interest served by compelling Cal Poly to disclose private residential addresses clearly outweighs the substantial privacy interests served by maintaining their confidentiality. For the reasons discussed herein, it does not. 2. Section 66312 Does Not Compel Disclosure of Residential Addresses Petitioner argues that Section 66312 reflects a legislative determination that the precise residential addresses contained in FSL Registration forms should be publicly disclosed. The statutory language does not support that conclusion. With respect to fraternity and sorority events, Section 66312 requires colleges and universities to publicly disclose: “The location, date, and time of any sanctioned event” (Educ. Code, § 66312, subds. (b)(1)(A)(ix) [emphasis added], (d)(1)(A)) and “The addresses of chapter houses and sanctioned events and names of sororities and fraternities where misconduct occurred” (Educ. Code, § 66312, subds. (d)(1)(A), (d)(3)(B) [emphasis added]). As a threshold matter, Section 66312 does not treat the terms “location” and “address” as interchangeable. Instead, the Legislature’s use of these two terms reflects an understanding that the “location” of an event is not necessarily synonymous with a precise street address. Had the Legislature intended to require disclosure of exact street addresses for all events, it easily could have said so. Its decision not to use that terminology must be given effect. (See Anderson Union High School Dist. v. Shasta Secondary Home School (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 262, 277-278 [finding that the use of the terms “site” and “schoolsite” in statute suggests that their meanings were not interchangeable].) Nevertheless, Petitioner repeatedly conflates “location” with “address.” (Petitioner’s Mot., pp. 14-15.) This interpretation violates the well-known principle of statutory construction that gives meaning to every word in a statute and avoids constructions that render statutory language mere surplusage. (People v. Reynoza (2024) 15 Cal.5th 982, 991.) Under Petitioner’s reading, every statutory reference to “location” necessarily means a specific 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 17 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES residential street address. That construction deprives the Legislature’s differing word choices of any independent meaning. The distinction is especially important in the context of fraternity and sorority events. An event’s “location” may be communicated in numerous ways without revealing the precise address of a private student residence. A location may be identified by reference to a recognized chapter house, a general vicinity, or another description sufficient to convey where an event occurred without disclosing private residential information contained in university records. (See RJN, Exs. 1-8.) And that is precisely what Cal Poly does—it provides general location information for sanctioned events, not precise street addresses. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 15-16.) Nothing in Section 66312 indicates that the Legislature intended to diminish the privacy interests associated with student residential address information. To the contrary, the Legislature’s use of the broader term “location” with respect to events generally reflects an intent to increase transparency regarding fraternity and sorority activities while preserving flexibility concerning the precise manner in which institutions satisfy those obligations. And the Legislature’s use of the more narrow term “address” with respect to events “where misconduct occurred” implies that disclosure of an address presents greater privacy concerns than disclosure of a location. In other words, only in situations involving misconduct is the public interest sufficiently strong to justify disclosure of a student’s address. B. Petitioner’s Stated Public Interest Is Attenuated and Speculative Petitioner characterizes the public interest in disclosure as overwhelming, but this overstates the case. Petitioner’s stated purpose is to determine whether fraternity/sorority houses are operating in violation of San Luis Obispo zoning ordinances. (Mot., p. 17:14-15.) But this goal can be pursued through means that do not require compelled disclosure of student residential addresses from university records. (See Versaci v. Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 805, 820 [noting that the balancing test includes consideration of whether “the public interest can be substantially advanced by means other than the requested disclosure”].) The City has its own investigative tools, code enforcement powers, and ability to observe and investigate suspected zoning violations through direct inspections. The fact that access to Cal Poly’s records would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 18 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES make code enforcement easier does not mean that the public interest in disclosure clearly outweighs the privacy interests at stake. Petitioner also contends that there is a substantial public interest in understanding “whether and how the University is authorizing fraternity-sanctioned events that may not comply with ‘all applicable laws.’” (Mot., p. 17:16-17.) This assumes – incorrectly – that Cal Poly is responsible for assessing whether an event that has not yet taken place will be compliant with laws that are not under Cal Poly’s purview. Petitioner assumes that disclosure of party addresses will reveal that Cal Poly has been approving events at locations that violate city zoning laws. But Cal Poly’s event registration process does not constitute a determination that a given address is lawfully operating as a fraternity house under city zoning laws. Instead, it is an internal administrative process to encourage compliance with university policies. The public accountability interest asserted by Petitioner therefore rests on a chain of inferences that does not overcome the concrete privacy interests of the students whose residential information is at stake. Petitioner contends that disclosure of the addresses at issue is necessary to determine whether Cal Poly is complying with its own policies requiring fraternities to comply with local laws. But the event registration process is not a method for Cal Poly to determine whether an off- campus residence is legally permitted for fraternity use, nor does Cal Poly actually make that determination at all. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 10.) Cal Poly does not approve or deny any of the events submitted for registration. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 4.) Accordingly, the fact that an event was registered says nothing about whether the event location complied with municipal zoning ordinances. To the extent that the occurrence of an event results in a zoning violation, the fact of event registration sheds no light on Cal Poly’s compliance with its own policies. Disclosure of addresses would not reveal whether Cal Poly is “allowing” illegal events because Cal Poly never makes that determination in the first place. C. Petitioner’s Cases Are Distinguishable and the Balancing Test Favors Cal Poly Petitioner’s reliance on CBS, Inc. v. Block (1986) 42 Cal.3d 646 and New York Times Company v. Superior Court (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 1579 is misplaced. Those cases involved individuals who had voluntarily entered into a regulatory relationship with a government agency 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 19 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES for personal benefit. Fraternity members who submit event registration information to Cal Poly’s FSL Office are students at an educational institution, and the information they provide is maintained in connection with their status as members of a recognized student organization. That context fundamentally distinguishes this case from the public accountability scenarios those decisions addressed. In CBS, the California Supreme Court ordered disclosure of home addresses of concealed- weapons permit holders. (CBS, Inc. v. Block, supra, 42 Cal.3d at p. 656.) The court emphasized that the permit holders had voluntarily sought a government license for a regulated activity (carrying a concealed weapon in public) and that public scrutiny of licensing decisions was essential to accountability. (Id. at p. 654.) The court was concerned with whether public officials were properly exercising their licensing authority in a domain directly affecting public safety. (Ibid.) The public interest was a determination of whether the public entity was following the law and properly determining whether or not someone could have a weapon. This case is materially different. In CBS, the public interest in disclosure arose from the need to evaluate whether governmental authority (to issue concealed carry licenses) was being exercised fairly, lawfully, and consistently. There is no comparable public interest here. Cal Poly is not licensing property for a particular land use, determining whether a residence may lawfully operate as a fraternity or sorority house, or deciding whether an event complies with municipal zoning ordinances. Those determinations lie exclusively within the City’s authority. The FSL Event Registration process serves a different purpose: promoting student health and safety concerning matters such as alcohol management, sober monitors, and event planning. Registering an event does not constitute University approval of the event or its location, nor does it constitute a determination of compliance with local laws. Consequently, disclosure of residential addresses would contribute little, if anything, to the public’s understanding of how Cal Poly performs its public functions. The interests of the individuals whose private information is sought are likewise fundamentally different. Concealed-carry permit applicants voluntarily seek a license to authorize them to engage in activities that implicate public safety. By contrast, Cal Poly students submit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 20 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES residential addresses only because the University requires that information as part of an event registration process. Students are not seeking any kind of approval that would affect the rights or safety of the public at large. Students therefore retain a reasonable expectation that private information submitted to their school will be handled pursuant to the university’s own policies as well as applicable laws and regulations (such as FERPA). In New York Times, the court ordered disclosure of water district customers who had violated water rationing ordinances. (New York Times Company v. Superior Court, supra, 218 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1581-1582.) These customers had entered into a voluntary commercial relationship with a public utility and their actions directly harmed other customers and the public and had already been found to be in violation of the law. (Id. at p. 1586.) Here, there is no analogous commercial or voluntary regulatory relationship. Cal Poly’s oversight of fraternities and sororities is an educational and administrative matter, and students registering to hold events (indeed, parties) have not entered into any public regulatory relationship. Education Code section 66312 already provides for publication of event addresses where misconduct has been found to have occurred. While New York Times could be cited to establish the validity of that portion of Section 66312, nothing in the case justifies a finding that would require Cal Poly to release private addresses when there has been no finding of misconduct. In contrast, the Court of Appeal’s decision in Voice of San Diego v. Superior Court (2021) 66 Cal.App.5th 669 illustrates why Petitioner’s reliance on CBS and New York Times is misplaced. In Voice of San Diego, the Court of Appeal upheld a county’s decision to redact the precise location and location address of COVID-19 outbreaks under the CPRA’s catchall exemption. (Id. at p. 694.) Applying the balancing test, the court concluded that the public interest in nondisclosure clearly outweighed the incremental benefit that disclosure of precise addresses would provide. (Id. at pp. 693-694.) The court found that the county established that disclosure of outbreak locations would undermine public trust in the contact-tracing process and discourage the candid cooperation necessary for public health officials to perform their responsibilities effectively. (Id. at pp. 691-692.) The same reasoning applies here. Cal Poly requires students to pre-register fraternity and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 21 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES sorority events and provide residential addresses as part of the University’s administrative oversight of recognized student organizations. Students do not submit those addresses with the expectation that they will be publicly disseminated. They submit them because it is required by the University. Public disclosure of compelled residential information undermines the trust that students reasonably place in the University’s administrative processes. Just as in Voice of San Diego, preserving that trust is an important governmental interest. (Id. at p. 685.) The court in Voice of San Diego also carefully evaluated the actual public value of the withheld information. (Id. at p. 693.) Although recognizing the public’s understandable interest in learning precise outbreak locations, the court concluded that disclosure of exact addresses would contribute little to the public’s understanding of governmental operations because substantial information had already been disclosed. (Ibid.) The remaining redacted information added only marginal additional value. (Id. at pp. 693-694.) The same is true here. Cal Poly has produced the FSL Event Registration records and has not concealed the existence of fraternity or sorority events.5 The sole information withheld consists of residential street addresses. Petitioner has not demonstrated that disclosure of those precise residential addresses would significantly improve the public’s understanding of Cal Poly’s administration of recognized student organizations. Instead, Petitioner’s principal asserted interest is facilitating the identification of residences that allegedly violate local zoning ordinances. But that objective is not directed toward evaluating Cal Poly’s governmental operations. Rather, it seeks to use the CPRA to assist with the enforcement of municipal regulations that Cal Poly neither administers nor enforces. As Voice of San Diego makes clear, the relevant inquiry is whether disclosure would meaningfully enhance the public’s understanding of the agency’s own activities, not whether disclosure could advance some collateral governmental objective. (Id.at p. 693.) Moreover, unlike in CBS and New York Times, Cal Poly’s interest is not based on generalized speculation that disclosure could result in criticism or inconvenience. Disclosure 5 Indeed, Cal Poly has already disclosed dates, organizations, themes, alcohol information, and non-residential, non-chapter house addresses. (Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶ 7; Galloway Decl., ¶¶ 6- 10.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 22 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES would have the very real effect of exposing students to targeted enforcement by the City. (Haft Decl., ¶¶ 6-13; Aiello-Coppola Decl., ¶¶ 17-22; Mockford Decl., ¶¶ 9-15.) For this reason, the University’s interest in protecting the confidentiality of those compelled residential disclosures and preserving student trust in its administrative processes is substantially more analogous to the governmental interests recognized in Voice of San Diego than to the speculative concerns rejected in CBS and New York Times. (See also American Civil Liberties Union Foundation v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 1032, 1043-1044 [affirming trial court determination that public records request for all data collected in one week by city’s automatic license plate readers was exempt under catchall provision of the CPRA].) II. Consideration of FERPA Counsels Against Disclosure of Addresses FERPA reflects Congress’s determination that protecting the privacy of information maintained by educational institutions is an important public policy. (BRV, Inc. v. Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 742, 751-752; Student Press Law Center v. Alexander (D.D.C. 1991) 778 F.Supp. 1227, 1228 [noting that FERPA’s purpose is “to ensure access to educational records for students and parents and to protect the privacy of such records from the public at large”].) That policy is directly implicated here. Petitioner devotes substantial attention to arguing that FERPA does not prohibit disclosure of the residential addresses contained in the FSL Event Registration records. But under the CPRA’s balancing test, the critical question is not whether FERPA prohibits disclosure but whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the privacy interests at stake clearly outweigh the public interest in disclosure. Cal Poly’s exercise of its obligations pursuant to FERPA is relevant to that balancing inquiry even if it does not independently bar disclosure. A. The FSL Event Registration Records Constitute Education Records Under FERPA As an initial matter, Petitioner argues that the FSL Event Registration records are not “education records” under FERPA because they do not relate to students’ academic performance or educational interests. This argument draws the scope of FERPA too narrowly. FERPA defines “education records” as records that (1) contain information “directly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 23 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES related to a student” and (2) are maintained by an educational institution. (20 U.S.C. § 1232g, subd. (a)(4)(A).) The FSL Event Registration records satisfy both prongs. First, they contain information submitted by students in their capacity as members of recognized student organizations—organizations whose recognition, and whose members’ standing within the university, depends on compliance with Cal Poly’s policies. The connection between the registration information and the students who submitted it is direct and evident. Second, the records are maintained by Cal Poly’s FSL Office, unquestionably an arm of the University. (Mockford Decl., ¶¶ 3-6.) Petitioner argues that under FERPA, the FSL Event Registration forms are not “directly related to a student” because they are not grade transcripts, class schedules, or discipline reports. But Petitioner ignores that a student’s membership in a recognized fraternity or sorority, and the events conducted under that recognition, are directly related to that student’s status and educational experience at the University. The FSL Event Registration records are maintained because of that relationship. Unlike parking tickets 6, pre-suit tort claims 7, and other incidental records that involve conduct entirely separate from the student’s university affiliations, FSL Event Registration forms, by contrast, are submitted through a formal university administrative process and are directly tied to the students’ maintenance of recognized organizational status. They are certainly more analogous to class schedules than to parking tickets. B. FERPA Considerations in the CPRA Balancing Test Favors Cal Poly Nevertheless, even if the FSL Event Registration forms are not “education records” as defined under FERPA, Cal Poly invoked FERPA not merely as an independent prohibition on disclosure, but as evidence of the strong public policy favoring protection of student privacy. FERPA expressly provides that schools may, but are not required to, disclose “directory information,” which includes student residential addresses. (20 U.S.C. § 1232g, subd. (a)(5)(B).) To that end, Cal Poly notifies students that the University may release directory information at its 6 Petitioner cites to a Maryland case, Kirwan v. The Diamondback (Md. 1998) 721 A.2d 196. 7 Petitioner cites to Poway Unified School District v. Superior Court (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1496. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 24 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES discretion. (See RJN, Ex. 9.) In doing so, Cal Poly makes selective determinations about whether disclosure of directory information in a particular context poses risks to student privacy or safety. This kind of discretion is expressly contemplated by FERPA. The residential addresses at issue may be “directory information” that Cal Poly is authorized under FERPA to disclose, but the additional context of how they were obtained cannot be disregarded. The addresses were obtained from students in the course of Cal Poly’s oversight and administration of recognized student organizations, so the information comes directly from the University’s educational relationship with its students. The fact that these records consist of information compelled from students by a public university as part of the administration of student organizations materially strengthens the privacy interests at stake. FERPA’s recognition of the importance of protecting student information reinforces the conclusion that those privacy interests clearly outweigh the limited additional public benefit that would result from disclosing precise residential addresses. C. Cal Poly’s Prior Disclosure Practices Do Not Constitute Waiver Petitioner contends that because Cal Poly previously disclosed fraternity event location address information pursuant to Section 66312, it has somehow waived its ability to invoke FERPA or other bases for privacy exemption. Not so. (See County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 475, 486 [DMV disclosure of addresses of registered owners of impounded vehicles to towing companies pursuant to statutory duty did not waive CPRA exemption]; see also Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1325, 1346 [disclosure in one context does not necessarily waive the right to assert CPRA exemptions in another]; Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School Dist. (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1250, 1262 [CPRA exemptions are permissive, not mandatory].) The CPRA contemplates that disclosure determinations under the catchall exemption are based upon the facts of the particular case and require agencies to balance competing interests as circumstances evolve. (Voice of San Diego, supra, 66 Cal.App.5th at pp. 684-685.) The fact that Cal Poly reevaluated its prior disclosure practices after learning about student concerns with how the City was using residential addresses for its code enforcement purposes reflects the thoughtful balancing that CPRA requires. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 25 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES III. Declaratory Relief Is Not Appropriate Petitioner seeks declarations governing Cal Poly’s future conduct with respect to fraternity and sorority event registration records and address information. The Court should decline to issue such sweeping relief. The California Supreme Court’s decision in City of Gilroy v. Superior Court (2026) 19 Cal.5th 38 authorizes declaratory relief under the CPRA where an agency is “reasonably likely to repeat past conduct that allegedly violates the CPRA in response to future records requests.” (Id. at p. 54.) But the declarations Petitioner seeks would go far beyond preventing a specific likely violation. Instead, they would establish categorical rules regardless of the specific facts of any future request, as required by the CPRA. The balancing test mandated under the CPRA’s catchall exemption is fact-intensive and depends on the specific nature of the records requested, the information they contain, the context in which they are created, and the specific privacy interests at stake. Issuing categorical declarations would improperly foreclose fact-specific analysis in the future and could bind Cal Poly to disclosure obligations in circumstances that have not been properly considered by the Court. CONCLUSION The CPRA does not require Cal Poly to disclose the residential addresses at issue. Cal Poly carefully balanced the substantial privacy interests implicated by disclosure against the limited public interest advanced by Petitioner and properly concluded that the catchall exemption applies. That determination is reinforced by the important privacy policies reflected in FERPA and in Education Code section 66312. For the same reason, Petitioner is not entitled to the broad declaratory relief she seeks. Therefore, Cal Poly respectfully requests that the Court deny the petition in its entirety and enter judgment in favor of Cal Poly. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 26 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES Dated: July 10, 2026 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP By:/s/ Han-Hsien Miletic J. Leah Castella Alexandra L. Mulhall Han-Hsien Miletic Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4900-9497-9770 v5 27 OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4906-8549-4204 v1 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN, LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES J. Leah Castella (SBN 205990) E-mail: lcastella@bwslaw.com Alexandra L. Mulhall (SBN 353051) E-mail: amulhall@bwslaw.com Han-Hsien Miletic (SBN 295957) E-mail: hmiletic@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO KATHIE WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Respondent/Defendant. Case No. 26CV-0166 DECLARATION OF HAN-HSIEN MILETIC IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Filed concurrently with Opposition to Motion for Judgment; Request for Judicial Notice Hearing Date: November 4, 2026 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 4 Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Tana L. Coates Department 4 Action Filed: March 18, 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4906-8549-4204 v1 2 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN, LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES DECLARATION OF HAN-HSIEN MILETIC I, HAN-HSIEN MILETIC, declare as follows: 1. I am an associate attorney with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, (“Burke”) attorneys of record for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG (together, “Cal Poly”). In that capacity, I am familiar with the contents of the case files maintained by our office in connection with this action. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge and my review of those files, except as to matters stated on information and belief.If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to the truth of the matters stated herein. With respect to the matters stated on information and belief, I am informed and believe that such matters are true. 2. On July 9, 2026, I accessed the webpage located at https://sororityfraternity.uci.edu/annual-reports/ to view UC Irvine’s AB 524 Annual Reports. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the 2024-2025 Annual Report I downloaded from the webpage. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the 2023-2024 Annual Report I downloaded from the webpage. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the 2022-2023 Annual Report I downloaded from the webpage. 3. Each of the UC Irvine Annual Reports contains hyperlinks to “Chapter SFL Event Reporting Lists” that correspond to the various Greek organizations at UC Irvine. I accessed numerous of these hyperlinks on July 9, 2026 and noted a pattern of disclosure of residential street addresses for events at what appear to be official chapter houses and a lack of residential street addresses otherwise. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a screengrab of one such page from the 2022-2023 Annual Report, located at the following webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17WRsg7WEy4Bp- PPS8bHpnoYN6r4uvMMu_bLzadS-H_g/edit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a screengrab of one such page from the 2023-2024 Annual Report, located at the following webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hkbq1zpGbjx1jui0tENixqcJsE70McCivrnmK90 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4906-8549-4204 v1 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE, W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN, LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES YJOM/edit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of a screengrab of one such page from the 2024-2025 Annual Report, located at the following webpage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JNfzeeKzPQUccNMDnDSpYG6IQONhHhS0OD VgdaJcmzM/edit?gid=1271155709#gid=1271155709. 4. On July 9, 2026, I accessed the webpage located at https://www.csulb.edu/student- affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 to view CSULB’s AB 524 annual report. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct PDF download of the webpage as it appeared on July 9, 2026. Based on my review of this webpage, I noted that CSULB did not publish any residential addresses other than those of affiliated chapter houses. 5. On July 9, 2026, I accessed the webpage located at https://activities.sfsu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/SFSU%2023- 24%20_%20AB%20524%20Annual%20Ennual%20Engagement%20Report.pdf to view the 2023- 2024 Fraternity & Sorority Life Annual Engagement Report by San Francisco State University. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of the report I viewed on July 9, 2026. Based on my review of the report, I noted that SFSU did not publish any residential addresses for sponsored events. 6. On July 9, 2026, I accessed the webpage located at: https://registrar.calpoly.edu/content/stu_info/ferpa. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of a screengrab of the webpage as it appeared on July 9, 2026. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on this 10th day of July, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. /s/ Han-Hsien Miletic Han-Hsien Miletic EXHIBIT 1 PREPARED BY2024-2025 ANNUAL REPORT CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITYAND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT ANNU AL REPO R T CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITYAND FRATERNITY TRANS PARENC Y AC T This report includes both self-reported data provided by active SFL chapters and community members in addition to information voluntarily provided by varying chapters, UCI stakeholders and others for the 2024-2025 school year. Included reports and SFL events are color-coded to show their council affiliations. Self-Reported Data - required of all SFL organizations quarterly Roster Edits - listing of active and new members Chapter SFL Event Reporting List (Chapters with submitted events will be accessible by hyperlink) Self-Reported Data - voluntarily provided by SFL organizations Philanthropy & Service form annual SFL Awards packet: (individual & chapter) Other Data provided in this report: quarterly Chapter Grade Reports (provided by UCI Registrar) University Status/Recognition (provided by Campus Organization & Volunteer Programs) Current Conduct Status (provided by Office of Academic Integrity & Student Conduct) NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT Interfraternity Council (IFC) Multicultural Sorority & Fraternity Council (MSFC) National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) Panhellenic Association (PHA) Page 2 of 45 This report incl u d es b oth self-reported d ata provid e d b y active SFL ch apters a nd community members in addition to information voluntarily provided by v arying ch apters, UCI stak e h o lders and oth ers f or th e 2024-2025 sch ool year. I ncl u d e d reports and SFL events are col or-cod e d to sh ow th eir council affi l iations. S e lf-Reported Data - required of all SFL organizations q uarterly Roster Edits - listing of active and new members Chapter SFL Event Reporting Listppg (Chap ters with submitted events will be accessible by hyperlink) S e lf-Reported Data - vol untaril y provid e d b y SFL organizations Philanthropy & Service formpy a nnual SFL Awards packet: (individual & chapter)p( p O t h er Data provid e d in th is report: q uarterly Chapter Grade Reportspp (provided by UCI Registrar) University Status/Recognitionyg (p rovided by Camp us Org anization & Volunteer Prog rams) Current Conduct Status (p rovided by Office of Academic Integ rity & Student Conduct) Interf raternity Council (IFC) Mul ticul tural Sorority & Fraternity Council (MSFC) N ational Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) Panh e llenic Association (PHA) Page 2 of 45 N O TE ONANNUAL REPO R T Additional Other Data provided in this report: Compliance with New Member Education (based on quarterly attendance by newest chapter members) Violence Intervention & Prevention (VIP) program standing categories Good Standing - compliance with i) submission of biweekly verification reports ii) completion of quarterly VIP program and attendance requirement and iii) enrolled in biweekly VIP course . Probationary Standing - out of compliance with following i) submission of biweekly verification reports; ii) completion of quarterly VIP program/attendance requirement and/or iii) enrollment in biweekly VIP course Poor Standing - not currently enrolled in biweekly VIP course. Citations and Disciplinary sanctions categories (provided by both Arroyo Vista of UCI Student Housing and the Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct) Listed sanctions will include the following categories: Hazing (H ) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O ) - including Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Please contact SFL at sororityfraternity@uci.edu for any questions related to this report NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT Page 3 of 45 Additional Oth er Data provid e d in th is report: C ompl iance with N ew Memb er Ed ucation (b ased on quarterl y attend ance b y newest ch apter memb ers) Violence Intervention & Prevention (VIP) program standing categories()pg g g Good Stand ing - compl iance with i) sub mission of b iweekly verif ication reports ii) comp letion of q uarterly VIP p rog ram and attendance req uirement and iii) enrolled in b iweekly VIP course . Probationary Standing - out of compliance with following i) submission of biweekly verification reports; ii) completion of quarterly VIP program/attendance requirement and /or iii) enrollment in b iweekly VIP course P oor Stand ing - not currentl y enrolle d in b iweekly VIP course. Citations and Disciplinary sanctions categoriespy g (provid e d b y b oth Arroyo Vista of UCI Student Housing and the Office of Academic Integ rity and Student Conduct) Listed san cti o n s w ill inc l ude t h e f ollowing categ ories: Hazing (H ) A l coh o l & Oth er Drugs (A O D ) Sexual Miscond uct/Assaul t (S MSA ) O t h er (O ) - incl u d ing Disord erl y/Lewd Cond uct; Fail ure to Compl y; Noise Compl aints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Ch ancellor Directives; Etc. Please contact SFL at sororityf raternity@uci.edu f or any questions rel ated to th is report Page 3 of 45 N O TE ONANNUAL REPO R T ALPHA CHI OMEGA, ΑΧΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $7568.01 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 106 Winter 2025: 107 Spring 2025: 107 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 31 Winter 2025: 16 Spring 2025: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.136 Winter 2025: 3.338 Spring 2025: 3.253 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.138 Winter 2025: 3.330 Spring 2025: 3.067 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement not met Spring 2025: requirement not met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Probationary Spring 2025: Good Page 4 of 45 ALPHA CHI OMEGA, ΑΧΩ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) ALPHA EPSILON OMEGA, ΑΕΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: 0 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 5 Winter 2025: 5 Spring 2025: 0 - failed to Report Number of New Members Fall 2024: 1 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 0 - failed to Report Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.522 Winter 2025: 3.706 Spring 2025: 0.00 - failed to Report Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement Met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Good Spring 2025: Poor * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 5 of 45 ALPHA EPS ILO N O MEG A , Α Ε Ω M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) ALPHA EPSILON PI, ΑΕΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 24 Winter 2025: 23 Spring 2025: 23 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 5 Winter 2025: 2 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.264 Winter 2025: 3.348 Spring 2025: 3.26 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.3486 Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: N/A - no new member Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: no submission (last submission in 2024) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Probationary Spring 2025: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 6 of 45 ALPHA EPSILON PI,Α ΕΠ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) ALPHA GAMMA ALPHA, ΑΓΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $3,500.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 22 Winter 2025: 19 Spring 2025: 17 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 10 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.589 Winter 2025: 3.629 Spring 2025: 3.404 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.456 Winter 2025: 3.787 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N//A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2025: Poor Winter 2025: Poor Spring 2025: Probationary Page 7 of 45 ALPHA GAMMA ALPHA,Α Γ Α M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) ALPHA KAPPA ALPHA SORORITY INC., ΑΚΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:80 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 8 Winter 2025: 7 Spring 2025: 7 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 6 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.410 Winter 2025: 3.706 Spring 2025: 3.546 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.546 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size Page 8 of 45 A LPHA KAPPA ALPHA SOR O RITY INC ., Α Κ Α NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) ALPHA KAPPA DELTA PHI, ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING a Κ Δ Φ Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 23 Winter 2025: 30 Spring 2025: 28 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 8 Winter 2025: 8 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.107 Winter 2025: 3.141 Spring 2025: 2.904 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.829 Winter 2025: 3.380 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission over the past three (3) years Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Good Spring 2025: Good Page 9 of 45 ALPHA KAPPA DELTA PHI, M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) a Κ Δ Φ ALPHA PHI, ΑΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $42,563.42 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1030 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 2 O - 5 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 136 Winter 2025: 137 Spring 2025: 138 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 41 Winter 2025: 7 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.385 Winter 2025: 3.413 Spring 2025: 3.364 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.180 Winter 2025: 2.877 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Probationary Spring 2025: Good Page 10 of 45 ALPHA PHI, Α Φ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) ALPHA SIGMA PHI, ΑΣΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:64 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 10 Winter 2025: 9 Spring 2025: 8 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 3 Winter 2025: 1 Spring 2025: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 2.925 Winter 2025: 3.281 Spring 2025: 3.301 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission (last submission in 2024) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 11 of 45 ALPHA S I G MA PHI,Α Σ Φ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CHI RHO OMICRON, ΧΡΟ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:144 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 8 Winter 2025: 7 Spring 2025: 7 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 2 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 2.659 Winter 2025: 2.029 Spring 2025: 2.812 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission (last submission in 2024) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Poor Winter 2025: Poor Spring 2025: Poor * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 12 of 45 CHI RHO OMICRON,ΧΡΟ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL DELTA DELTA DELTA, ΔΔΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $19,098.92 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1044 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 1 O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 137 Winter 2025: 142 Spring 2025: 137 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 41 Winter 2025: 11 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.335 Winter 2025: 3.413 Spring 2025: 3.332 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.191 Winter 2025: 3.080 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new member Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2025: Good Spring 2025: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 13 of 45 DELTA DELTA DELTA, ΔΔΔ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) DELTA GAMMA, Δ Γ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $19,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: O - 2 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 137 Winter 2025: 141 Spring 2025: 136 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 43 Winter 2025: 8 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.503 Winter 2025: 3.560 Spring 2025: 3.478 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.557 Winter 2025: 3.512 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Probationary Page 14 of 45 DELTA G AMMA, Δ Γ P ANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) DELTA LAMBDA CHI, Δ Λ X ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:96 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $30.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 15 Winter 2025: 16 Spring 2025: 16 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 3 Winter 2025: 4 Spring 2025: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.181 Winter 2025: 2,996 Spring 2025: 3.319 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: 3.319 Spring 2025: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 15 of 45 DELTA LAMBDA CHI, Δ Λ X M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY INC., DST ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $500.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: 9 Number of New Members Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: 9 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: 3.670 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: 3.670 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: requirement not met Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing N/A - became active in Spring 2025 Page 16 of 45 DELTA S I G MA THETA SOR O RITY INC ., DS T NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) GAMMA PHI BETA, ΓΦΒ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $4,537.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1018 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 123 Winter 2025: 126 Spring 2025: 120 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 39 Winter 2025: 22 Spring 2025: 10 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.329 Winter 2025: 3.457 Spring 2025: 3.380 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.399 Winter 2025: 3.530 Spring 2025: 3.462 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Page 17 of 45 GAMMA PHI BETA,Γ ΦΒ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) KAPPA ALPHA THETA, ΚΑΘ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:243 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $13,089.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1014 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 83 Winter 2025: 86 Spring 2025: 87 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 21 Winter 2025: 8 Spring 2025: 8 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.431 Winter 2025: 3.490 Spring 2025: 3.380 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.353 Winter 2025: 3.585 Spring 2025: 3.462 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement not met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Page 18 of 45 KAPPA ALPHA THETA,Κ Α Θ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) KAPPA SIGMA, ΚΣ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $2,762.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1040 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 9 O - 26 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 58 Winter 2025: 65 Spring 2025: 63 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 13 Winter 2025: 12 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.174 Winter 2025: 3.293 Spring 2025: 3.231 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.955 Winter 2025: 3.343 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Poor Winter 2024: Poor Spring 2024: Poor Page 19 of 45 KAPPA SIGMA,ΚΣ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL KAPPA ZETA PHI, ΚΖΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: SUSPENDED (as of July 2025)Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0.0 Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 No Chapter SFL Event Reporting List Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: H - 1 AOD -1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Current University Status: Inactive/Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 31 Winter 2025: 31 Spring 2025: Failed to Report - 31 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 15 Winter 2025: N/A - interim suspension Spring 2025: N/A - interim suspension Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.217 Winter 2025: 3.251 Spring 2025: 0.00 - failed to report Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.417 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: N/A - interim suspension Spring 2024: N/A - interim suspension Page 20 of 45 KAPPA ZETA PHI, Κ Ζ Φ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) LAMBDA THETA DELTA, ΛΘΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:770 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recgonized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 33 Winter 2025: 24 Spring 2025: 19 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 9 Winter 2025: 2 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.180 Winter 2025: 3.254 Spring 2025: 3.305 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.975 Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 21 of 45 LAMBDA THETA DELTA,Λ Θ Δ MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) LAMBDA UPSILON LAMBDA FRATERNITY INC., ΛΥΛ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:15 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 4 Winter 2025: 4 Spring 2025: 5 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 3 Winter 2025: 3 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 2.504 Winter 2025: 3.461 Spring 2025: 3.341 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 22 of 45 LAMBDA UPSILON LAMBDA FRATERNITY INC.,ΛΥΛ MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) NU ALPHA KAPPA, ΝΑΚ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:32 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $580.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 16 Winter 2025: 16 Spring 2025: 21 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 9 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.304 Winter 2025: 3.175 Spring 2025: 2.974 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.182 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: 2.967 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: requirement met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Page 23 of 45 NU ALPHA KAPPA,ΝΑΚ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) PHI DELTA THETA, Φ Δ Θ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: SUSPENDED Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A No Chapter SFL Event Reporting List Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Inactive/Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2025: N/A - suspended Spring 2025: N/A - suspended Number of New Members Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2025: N/A - suspended Spring 2025: N/A - suspended Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2025: N/A - suspended Spring 2025: N/A - suspended Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2025: N/A - suspended Spring 2025: N/A - suspended Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2025: N/A - suspended Spring 2025: N/A - suspended Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: N/A - suspended Winter 2024: N/A - suspended Spring 2024: N/A - suspended Page 24 of 45 PHI DELTA THETA, Φ Δ Θ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) PHI GAMMA DELTA, ΦΓΔ (FIJI) ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $3487.63 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1038 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 1 O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 59 Winter 2025: 62 Spring 2025: 61 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 17 Winter 2025: 1 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.106 Winter 2025: 3.310 Spring 2025: 3.155 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.896 Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 25 of 45 PHI G AMMA DELTA,ΦΓΔ (FIJI) INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) PHI KAPPA PSI, ΦΚΨ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $494.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 31 Winter 2025: 30 Spring 2025: 27 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 12 Winter 2025: 14 Spring 2025: 11 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 2.971 Winter 2025: 3.069 Spring 2025: 3.271 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.253 Winter 2025: 3.082 Spring 2025: 3.426 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement not met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Poor Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Probationary Page 26 of 45 PHI KAPPA PS I ,Φ Κ Ψ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) PHI LAMBDA RHO, ΦΛΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours: 0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 43 Winter 2025: 38 Spring 2025: 36 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 32 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.319 Winter 2025: 3.38 Spring 2025: 3.313 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.237 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Page 27 of 45 PHI LAMBDA RHO, Φ Λ Ρ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) PHI SIGMA RHO, ΦΣΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A No Chapter SFL Event Reporting List Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Inactive/Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Number of New Members Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Submission of Annual SFL Awards: N/A - inactve Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing N/A - inactive Page 28 of 45 PHI S I G MA RHO,Φ Σ Ρ PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) PHI ZETA TAU, ΦΖΤ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A No Chapter SFL Event Reporting List Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Inactive/Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Number of New Members Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: N/A - inactive Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Submission of Annual SFL Awards: N/A - inactve Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing N/A - inactive Page 29 of 45 PHI ZETA TAU, Φ ΖΤ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) PI BETA PHI, ΠΒΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:65 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $4,167.05 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1036 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 116 Winter 2025: 129 Spring 2025: 109 Number of New Members Fall 2024: Failed to report Winter 2025: 17 Spring 2025: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.360 Winter 2025: 3.457 Spring 2025: 3.344 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2025: 3.396 Spring 2025: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement not met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Page 30 of 45 PI BETA PHI, Π Β Φ P ANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) PI KAPPA ALPHA, ΠΚΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $4,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 61 Winter 2025: 66 Spring 2025: 52 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 46 - failed to report Winter 2025: 9 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.165 Winter 2025: 3.290 Spring 2025: 3.259 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2025: 3.299 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement not met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission (last submission in 2022) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Page 31 of 45 PI KAPPA ALPHA,Π Κ Α INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) SIGMA CHI, ΣΧ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 83 Winter 2025: 54 Spring 2025: 91 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 27 - failed to report Winter 2025: 13 Spring 2025: 10 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.174 Winter 2025: 3.292 Spring 2025: 3.259 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2025: 3.467 Spring 2025: 3.711 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Poor Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $52,472.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1024 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 21 O - 28 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage & Destruction & Destruction (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Page 32 of 45 SIGMA CHI,ΣΧ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) SIGMA LAMBDA GAMMA, ΣΛΓ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 4 Winter 2025: 4 Spring 2025: 3 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 0 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.556 Winter 2025: 2.843 Spring 2025: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: N/A - no new members Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: N/A - no new members Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission (last submission in 2024) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:9 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Page 33 of 45 S I G MA LAMBDA G AMMA,ΣΛΓ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) SIGMA NU, ΣΝ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 16 Winter 2025: 16 Spring 2025: 16 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 3 Winter 2025: 2 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.270 Winter 2025: 3.123 Spring 2025: 3.345 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: Unavailable* Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement not met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,700.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Page 34 of 45 SIGMA NU, ΣΝ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) SIGMA OMICRON PI, ΣΟΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 17 Winter 2025: 20 Spring 2025: 20 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 8 Winter 2025: 5 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 2.831 Winter 2025: 3.155 Spring 2025: 3.118 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.849 Winter 2025: 2.754 Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: No submission (last submission in 2023) Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Probationary Page 35 of 45 SIGMA OMICRON PI,ΣΟΠ M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) SIGMA PHI EPSILON, ΣΦΕ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $5,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 35 Winter 2025: 46 Spring 2025: 51 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 10 Winter 2025: 11 Spring 2025: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.198 Winter 2025: 3.285 Spring 2025: 3.362 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 2.882 Winter 2025: 3.088 Spring 2025: 3.296 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement not met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Page 36 of 45 SIGMA PHI EPSILON,Σ ΦΕ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) SIGMA PI, ΣΠ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 95 Winter 2025: 85 Spring 2025: 89 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 15 Winter 2025: 12 Spring 2025: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.222 Winter 2025: 3.313 Spring 2025: 3.308 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.175 Winter 2025: 2.754 Spring 2025: 3.358 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: requirement met Spring 2025: requirement met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE Page 37 of 45 SIGMA PI, ΣΠ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) SIGMA PI ALPHA, ΣΠΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 81 Winter 2025: 96 Spring 2025: 67 Number of New Members Fall 2024: 52 Winter 2025: 0 Spring 2025: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.152 Winter 2025: 3.294 Spring 2025: 3.216 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: 3.129 Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement met Winter 2025: N/A - no new members Spring 2025: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,902.54 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Page 38 of 45 SIGMA PI ALPHA, Σ Π Α M ULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) TRIANGLE ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Current University Status: Active Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2024: 7 Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Number of New Members Fall 2024: 1 Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2024: 3.353 Winter 2025: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2025: 0.00 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2024: Unavailable* Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2024: requirement not met Winter 2025: N/A - inactive Spring 2025: N/A - inactive Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2024: Poor Winter 2024: N/A - inactive Spring 2024: N/A - inactive * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form Page 39 of 45 TRIANG L E INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES 203 Student Services 1 Irvine, CA 92697‑2200 8:00AM-4:00PM Crisis Care available 24/7 (949) 824-6457 UCI COUNSELING CENTER UCI SFL Page 40 of 45 203 Stud ent Services 1 I rvine, CA 92697 ‑2200 8 :00AM-4 :00P M C risis Care available 24/7 (949) 824-6457 UCI COUNS ELING CENT E R UCI S F L A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES UCI SFL Page 41 of 45 Consultation - by appt only (referral by UCI personnel) Preferred method for referrals: online referral form campussocialworker@uci.edu (949) 824-0101 OFFICE OF CAMPUS SOCIAL WORK Consul tation - b y appt only (referral by UCI personnel) P ref erred meth o d f or ref erral s: o n l ine ref erral f orm campussocialworker@uci.edup@ (949) 824-0101 O FFIC E OF C A MPUS SOCIAL W O R K UCI S F L A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES UCI SFL Page 42 of 45 501 Student Health Irvine, CA 92697-5200 On-campus psychiatric services, covered by Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP) (949) 824-5301 STUDENT HEALTH CENTER 501 Stud ent Heal t h Irvine, CA 92697 -5200 O n-campus psy c h iatric s ervices, covered by Stud ent Heal t h Insurance P lan (SHIP) (949) 824-5301 S T UDENT HEALTH C ENT E R UCI S F L A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES UCI SFL Page 43 of 45 Tailored directory of long-term off-campus therapists provided to UCI students in partnership with the Counseling Center (949) 824-6457 THE SHRINK SPACE Tail ored d irectory of long -term off-campus therapists provid e d to UCI students in partnership with the Counsel ing Center (949) 824-6457 T H E S HRINK S P A CE UCI S F L A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES UCI SFL Page 44 of 45 Sorority & Fraternity Life Office or Santa Ana Residential & Outpatient 1901 E. 4 St., Suite 350 th Santa Ana, CA 92705 (714) 788-8686 Sorority & Fraternity Life Office or S anta Ana R esidential & Outpatient 1901 E. 4 St., Suite 350th Santa Ana, CA 927 0 5 (714) 788-8686 UCI S F L EXHIBIT 2 PREPARED BY ANNUAL REPORT CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITYAND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT 2023-2024 This report includes both self-reported data provided by active SFL chapters and community members in addition to information voluntarily provided by varying chapters, UCI stakeholders and others for the 2023-2024 school year. Included reports and SFL events are color-coded to show their council affiliations. Self-Reported Data - required of all SFL organizations quarterly Roster Edits - listing of active and new members Chapter SFL Event Reporting List (Chapters with submitted events will be accessible by hyperlink) Self-Reported Data - voluntarily provided by SFL organizations Philanthropy & Service form annual SFL Awards packet: (individual & chapter) Other Data provided in this report: quarterly Chapter Grade Reports (provided by UCI Registrar) University Status/Recognition (provided by Campus Organization & Volunteer Programs) Current Conduct Status (provided by Office of Academic Integrity & Student Conduct) UCI SFL NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT Additional Other Data provided in this report: Compliance with New Member Education (based on quarterly attendance by newest chapter members) Violence Intervention & Prevention (VIP) program standing categories Good Standing - compliance with i) submission of weekly verification reports ii) completion of quarterly VIP program and attendance requirement and iii) enrolled in weekly/annual VIP program Probationary Standing - out of compliance with following i) submission of weekly verification reports; ii) completion of quarterly VIP program/attendance requirement and/or iii) enrollment in weekly/annual VIP program Bad Standing - not currently enrolled in weekly/annual VIP program Citations and Disciplinary sanctions categories (provided by both Arroyo Vista of UCI Student Housing and the Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct) Listed sanctions will include the following categories: Hazing (H ) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O ) - including Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Please contact SFL at sororityfraternity@uci.edu for any questions related to this report UCI SFL Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 96 Winter 2024: 99 Spring 2024: 104 Number of New Members Fall 2023: failed to list - 29 Winter 2024: 16 Spring 2024: 9 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.249 Winter 2024: 3.411 Spring 2024: 3.315 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2024: 3.396 Spring 2024: 2.613 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: no submission Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good ALPHA CHI OMEGA, ΑΧΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $6184.69 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 2 O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) ALPHA EPSILON OMEGA, ΑΕΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 25 Winter 2024: 10 Spring 2024: 9 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 7 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.605 Winter 2024: 3.586 Spring 2024: 3.531 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.393 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,300.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC ALPHA EPSILON PI, ΑΕΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 19 Winter 2024: 28 Spring 2024: 27 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 13 Winter 2024: 3 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.181 Winter 2024: 3.304 Spring 2024: 3.356 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.056 Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $650.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ALPHA GAMMA ALPHA, ΑΓΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 20 Winter 2024: 19 Spring 2024: 18 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 6 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.246 Winter 2024: 3.554 Spring 2024: 3.466 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.619 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Bad Total community service hours:108 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC ALPHA KAPPA ALPHA SORORITY INC., ΑΚΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) Current University Status: Active/Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 3 Winter 2024: 3 Spring 2024: 2 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 3 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: Unavailable* Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form ALPHA KAPPA DELTA PHI, ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 25 Winter 2024: 25 Spring 2024: 26 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 10 Winter 2024: 4 Spring 2024: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.456 Winter 2024: 3.356 Spring 2024: 3.352 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.348 Winter 2024: 3.485 Spring 2024: 2.544 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: no submissions since 2022-2023 Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Probationary Total community service hours:114 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING a Κ Δ Φ Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC ALPHA PHI, ΑΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 117 Winter 2024: 116 Spring 2024: 120 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 46 Winter 2024: 9 Spring 2024: 6 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.280 Winter 2024: 3.447 Spring 2024: 3.507 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.115 Winter 2024: 3.575 Spring 2024: 3.502 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Not Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $42,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 1 O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ALPHA SIGMA PHI, ΑΣΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 10 Winter 2024: 12 Spring 2024: 10 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 5 Winter 2024: 3 Spring 2024: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.039 Winter 2024: 2.505 Spring 2024: 3.075 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.336 Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Bad Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,300.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING CHI RHO OMICRON, ΧΡΟ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 8 Winter 2024: 8 Spring 2024: Number of New Members Fall 2023: 0 Winter 2024: 3 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.006 Winter 2024: 2.545 Spring 2024: 2.811 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Bad Spring 2024: Bad * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:20 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL DELTA DELTA DELTA, ΔΔΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 112 Winter 2024: 117 Spring 2024: 121 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 42 Winter 2024: failed to report - 12 Spring 2024: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.234 Winter 2024: 3.289 Spring 2024: 3.366 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.184 Winter 2024: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2024: 3.924 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $15,491.02 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 1 O - 2 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION DELTA GAMMA, Δ Γ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 125 Winter 2024: 122 Spring 2024: 122 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 40 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.396 Winter 2024: 3.538 Spring 2024: 3.572 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.376 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:2,610 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $12,400.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING DELTA LAMBDA CHI, Δ Λ X ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 10 Winter 2024: 13 Spring 2024: 17 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 3 Winter 2024: 3 Spring 2024: 4 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.122 Winter 2024: 3.135 Spring 2024: 3.216 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: 3.028 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Recruitment Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Recruitment Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours: 34 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC GAMMA PHI BETA, ΓΦΒ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 109 Winter 2024: 121 Spring 2024: 116 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 41 Winter 2024: failed to report - 17 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.283 Winter 2024: 3.356 Spring 2024: 3.339 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.313 Winter 2024: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Not Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:390 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $15,116.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING KAPPA ALPHA THETA, ΚΑΘ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 107 Winter 2024: 87 Spring 2024: 96 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 45 Winter 2024: 7 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.413 Winter 2024: 3.429 Spring 2024: 3.514 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.344 Winter 2024: 3.357 Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:140 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $8,524.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING KAPPA SIGMA, ΚΣ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 66 Winter 2024: 62 Spring 2024: 50 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 20 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.121 Winter 2024: 3.246 Spring 2024: 3.332 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.074 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Not Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:0.0 Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: H - 1 AOD - 8 O - 3 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL KAPPA ZETA PHI, ΚΖΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 23 Winter 2024: 20 Spring 2024: 21 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 8 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.204 Winter 2024: 3.219 Spring 2024: 3.210 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.149 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Probationary Total community service hours:52 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING LAMBDA THETA DELTA, ΛΘΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 17 Winter 2024: 23 Spring 2024: 23 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 6 Winter 2024: 7 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.108 Winter 2024: 2.955 Spring 2024: 3.066 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 2.953 Winter 2024: 3.063 Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Bad Spring 2024: Probationary Total community service hours:18 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC LAMBDA UPSILON LAMBDA, ΛΥΛ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Winter 2024: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Spring 2024: 1 Number of New Members Fall 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Winter 2024: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Spring 2024: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Winter 2024: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Spring 2024: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Winter 2024: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Winter 2024: N/A - became active in Spring 2024 Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form NU ALPHA KAPPA, ΝΑΚ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 15 Winter 2024: 14 Spring 2024: 14 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 6 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.093 Winter 2024: 3.156 Spring 2024: 3.124 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 2.971 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Quarterly New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form PHI DELTA THETA, Φ Δ Θ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Inactive / Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 35 Winter 2024: 27 Spring 2024: 27 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 6 Winter 2024: 2 Spring 2024: 4 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.152 Winter 2024: 3.253 Spring 2024: 3.250 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.242 Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: 2.638 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $360.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: SUSPENDED (as of August 2024) PHI GAMMA DELTA, ΦΓΔ (FIJI) ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 41 Winter 2024: 52 Spring 2024: 51 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 11 Winter 2024: 9 Spring 2024: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.019 Winter 2024: 3.138 Spring 2024: 3.152 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 2.492 Winter 2024: 3.057 Spring 2024: 2.948 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Bad Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:44 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $3,531.91 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 2 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING PHI KAPPA PSI, ΦΚΨ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 19 Winter 2024: 19 Spring 2024: 26 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 3 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 8 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.260 Winter 2024: 3.042 Spring 2024: 3.218 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: Unavailable* Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: 3.029 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A Spring 2024: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Bad Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form PHI LAMBDA RHO, ΦΛΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 20 Winter 2024: 19 Spring 2024: 14 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 13 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.146 Winter 2024: 3.125 Spring 2024: 3.290 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.127 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:22 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC PHI SIGMA RHO, ΦΣΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 5 Winter 2024: 6 Spring 2024: 5 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 1 Winter 2024: 1 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 2.944 Winter 2024: 2.981 Spring 2024: 3.330 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: Unavailable* Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form PHI ZETA TAU, ΦΖΤ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 10 Winter 2024: 12 Spring 2024: 8 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 0 Winter 2024: 2 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.523 Winter 2024: 3.365 Spring 2024: 3.563 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Submission of Annual SFL Awards: chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:8 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC PI BETA PHI, ΠΒΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 112 Winter 2024: 116 Spring 2024: 86 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 35 Winter 2024: failed to report -11 Spring 2024: failed to report - 14 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.391 Winter 2024: 3.435 Spring 2024: 3.391 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.488 Winter 2024: 0.00 - new members not listed Spring 2024: 0.00 - new members not listed Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:100 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $5,707.03 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for this chapter. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING SIGMA CHI, ΣΧ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 84 Winter 2024: 94 Spring 2024: 84 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 26 Winter 2024: 9 Spring 2024: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.140 Winter 2024: 3.558 Spring 2024: 3.383 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.231 Winter 2024: 3.233 Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:65 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $84,700.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive Irvine, CA 92697-3935 Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 8 O - 3 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING SIGMA LAMBDA GAMMA, ΣΛΓ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 7 Winter 2024: 8 Spring 2024: 7 Number of New Members Fall 202: 4 Winter 2024: 1 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.609 Winter 2024: 3.533 Spring 2024: 3.511 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Probationary * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC SIGMA NU, ΣΝ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 15 Winter 2024: 15 Spring 2024: 18 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 0 Winter 2024: 2 Spring 2024: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.126 Winter 2024: 3.093 Spring 2024: 2.759 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: N/A - no new members Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter applications submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form SIGMA OMICRON PI, ΣΟΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 9 Winter 2024: 8 Spring 2024: 11 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 3 Winter 2024: failed to report - 2 Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 2.906 Winter 2024: 2.722 Spring 2024: 2.750 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: Unavailable* Winter 2024: Unavailable* Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Not Met Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: individual application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC SIGMA PHI EPSILON, ΣΦΕ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 33 Winter 2024: 42 Spring 2024: 42 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 6 Winter 2024: 9 Spring 2024: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.354 Winter 2024: 3.336 Spring 2024: 3.186 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.376 Winter 2024: 3.233 Spring 2024: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: Requirement Met Spring 2024: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: individual/chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: PROBATION SIGMA PI, ΣΠ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 110 Winter 2024: 102 Spring 2024: 100 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 31 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: 9 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.3130 Winter 2024: 3.252 Spring 2024: 3.279 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.038 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: 3.266 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Bad Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $15,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING SIGMA PI ALPHA, ΣΠΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 62 Winter 2024: 54 Spring 2024: 40 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 32 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.083 Winter 2024: 3.208 Spring 2024: 3.220 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.024 Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: chapter application submitted Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Good Winter 2024: Good Spring 2024: Good CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form TRIANGLE ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2023: 11 Winter 2024: 10 Spring 2024: 9 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 2 Winter 2024: 0 Spring 2024: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.204 Winter 2024: 3.436 Spring 2024: 3.206 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: Unavailable* Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2024: N/A - no new members Spring 2024: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submissions since 2022-2023 Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2023: Probationary Winter 2024: Probationary Spring 2024: Good * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members here, this information will not be shared to maintain compliance with Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $300.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES 203 Student Services 1 Irvine, CA 92697‑2200 8:00AM-4:00PM Crisis Care available 24/7 (949) 824-6457 UCI COUNSELING CENTER Consultation - by appt only (referral by UCI personnel) Preferred method for referrals: online referral form campussocialworker@uci.edu (949) 824-0101 OFFICE OF CAMPUS SOCIAL WORK UCI SFL A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES 501 Student Health Irvine, CA 92697-5200 On-campus psychiatric services, covered by Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP) (949) 824-5301 STUDENT HEALTH CENTER Tailored directory of long- term off-campus therapists provided to UCI students in partnership with the Counseling Center (949) 824-6457 THE SHRINK SPACE UCI SFL 43 EXHIBIT  PREPARED BY ANNUAL REPORT CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITYAND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT quarterly Roster Edits - listing of active and new members Chapter SFL Event Reporting List Philanthropy & Service form completion of annual SFL Awards packet quarterly Chapter Grade Reports (provided by UCI Registrar) University Status/Recognition (provided by Campus Organization & Volunteer Programs) Current Conduct Status (provided by Office of Academic Integrity & Student Conduct) This report includes both self-reported data provided by active SFL chapters and community members in addition to information voluntarily provided by varying chapters, UCI stakeholders and others 2022-2023. Included reports and SFL events are color-coded to show their council affiliations. Self-Reported Data - required of all SFL organizations (Chapters with submitted events will be accessible by hyperlink) Self-Reported Data - voluntarily provided by SFL organizations Other Data provided in this report: NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT 2 NOTE ONANNUAL REPORT Compliance with New Member Education Violence Intervention & Prevention (VIP) program standing categories Good Standing - compliance with i) submission of weekly verification reports ii) completion of quarterly VIP program and attendance requirement and iii) enrolled in weekly/annual VIP program Probationary Standing - out of compliance with following i) submission of weekly verification reports; ii) completion of quarterly VIP program/attendance requirement and/or iii) enrollment in weekly/annual VIP program Bad Standing - not currently enrolled in weekly/annual VIP program Citations and Disciplinary sanctions categories (provided by both Arroyo Vista of UCI Student Housing and the Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct) Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - including Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Additional Other Data provided in this report: (based on quarterly attendance by newest chapter members) Listed sanctions will include the following categories: Please contact SFL at sororityfraternity@uci.edu for any questions related to this report 3 Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 83 Winter 2023: 84 Spring 2023: 93 Number of New Members Fall 2022: failed to report Winter 2023: 6 Spring 2023: 12 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.171 Winter 2023: 3.289 Spring 2023: 3.253 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: 3.428 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted ALPHA CHI OMEGA, ΑΧΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) 4 ALPHA EPSILON OMEGA, ΑΕΩ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 17 Winter 2023: 15 Spring 2023: 12 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 4 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.474 Winter 2023: 3.703 Spring 2023: 3.432 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.857 Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022:Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 5 ALPHA EPSILON PI, ΑΕΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 15 Winter 2023: 18 Spring 2023: 15 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 5 Winter 2023:3 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.492 Winter 2023: 3.361 Spring 2023: 3.264 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.416 Winter 2023: 3.537 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Bad Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Bad Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $520.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 6 ALPHA GAMMA ALPHA, ΑΓΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 21 Winter 2023: 20 Spring 2023: 20 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 9 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.580 Winter 2023: 3.501 Spring 2023: 3.689 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.619 Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Bad Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted Total community service hours:140 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $8,650.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ulticultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 7 ALPHA KAPPA DELTA PHI, ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 22 Winter 2023: 18 Spring 2023: 24 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 6 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.269 Winter 2023: 3.188 Spring 2023: 3.406 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: 3.398 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: no submission Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:145 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,116.49 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING a Κ Δ Φ Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 8 ALPHA PHI, ΑΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 117 Winter 2023: 117 Spring 2023: 114 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 18 Winter 2023: failed to report - 5 Spring 2023: 6 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.418 Winter 2023: 3.458 Spring 2023: 3.298 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.313 Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: 3.604 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $4,500.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 9 ALPHA SIGMA PHI, ΑΣΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: 8 Number of New Members Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: 6 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: 3.219 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: 3.219 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Winter 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Spring 2023: N/A - became active in Spring 2023 Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 10 CHI RHO OMICRON, ΧΡΟ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 8 Winter 2023: 11 Spring 2023: 11 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 3 Winter 2023: 6 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.345 Winter 2023: 3.004 Spring 2023: 2.147 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.240 Winter 2023: 3.245 Spring 2023: N/A Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes Chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 11 CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL DELTA DELTA DELTA, ΔΔΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 111 Winter 2023: 108 Spring 2023: 113 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 34 Winter 2023: 6 Spring 2023: 16 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.275 Winter 2023: 3.364 Spring 2023: 3.073 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.255 Winter 2023: 2.968 Spring 2023: 3.298 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $13,039.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 12 DELTA GAMMA, Δ Γ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 131 Winter 2023: 129 Spring 2023: 119 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 38 Winter 2023: 6 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.474 Winter 2023: 3.506 Spring 2023: 3.385 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.295 Winter 2023: 3.373 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $15,000 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 AOD - 1 O - 2 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 13 DELTA LAMBDA CHI, Δ Λ X ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 9 Winter 2023: 10 Spring 2023: 10 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 2 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.054 Winter 2023: 3.033 Spring 2023: 2.908 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: 3.675 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours: 83.5 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 14 DELTA PHI GAMMA, Δ ΦΓ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Inactive / Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 3 Winter 2023: 2 Spring 2023: 2 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: Unavailable* Winter 2023: Unavailable* Spring 2023: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Bad Spring 2023: Bad Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:50 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,500.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: H - 1 AOD - 1 Citations and Disciplinary categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: SUSPENSION Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 15 GAMMA PHI BETA, ΓΦΒ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 100 Winter 2023: 93 Spring 2023: 101 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 36 Winter 2023: failed to report - 14 Spring 2023: 8 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.222 Winter 2023: 3.252 Spring 2023: 3.328 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2023: 3.240 Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: 3.227 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $17,970.33 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 16 KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC., ΚΑΨ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL (NPHC) Current University Status: Inactive Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 2 Winter 2023: 2 Spring 2023: 2 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: Unavailable* Winter 2023: Unavailable* Spring 2023: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submission Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Last meeting was Winter 2023 * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours: 2 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list not provided Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 17 KAPPA ALPHA THETA, ΚΑΘ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 94 Winter 2023: 80 Spring 2023: 79 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 33 Winter 2023: failed to report - 9 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.317 Winter 2023: 3.377 Spring 2023: 3.368 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.284 Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:349 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $11,242.41 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 18 KAPPA SIGMA, ΚΣ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 64 Winter 2023: 59 Spring 2023: 63 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 16 Winter 2023: 2 Spring 2023: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.941 Winter 2023: 3.190 Spring 2023: 3.348 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.870 Winter 2023: Unavailable* Spring 2023: 3.509 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Bad Winter 2023: Bad Spring 2023: Bad Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:16 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 AOD - 1 O - 12 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 19 CAMPUS-RECOGNIZED SORORITY AND FRATERNITY TRANSPARENCY ACT UCI SFL KAPPA ZETA PHI, ΚΖΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 31 Winter 2023: 28 Spring 2023: 24 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 10 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.056 Winter 2023: 3.250 Spring 2023: 3.317 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.904 Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submission Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:150 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $230.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 20 LAMBDA THETA DELTA, ΛΘΔ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 19 Winter 2023: 20 Spring 2023: 20 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 10 Winter 2023: 12 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.081 Winter 2023: 2.900 Spring 2023: 3.004 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.277 Winter 2023: 2.934 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2023: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted Total community service hours:36 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ulticultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 21 NU ALPHA KAPPA, ΝΑΚ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 15 Winter 2023: 9 Spring 2023: 14 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 1 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.315 Winter 2023: 3.103 Spring 2023: 3.255 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: Unavailable* Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: 3.192 Quarterly New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:15 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 22 PHI DELTA THETA, Φ Δ Θ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 55 Winter 2023: 51 Spring 2023: 46 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 10 Winter 2023: 20 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.159 Winter 2023: 3.110 Spring 2023: 3.174 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.451 Winter 2023: 2.831 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Bad Winter 2023: Bad Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted Total community service hours:45 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $500.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 23 PHI GAMMA DELTA, ΦΓΔ (FIJI) ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 47 Winter 2023: 48 Spring 2023: 49 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 15 Winter 2023: failed to report - 10 Spring 2023: 3 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.033 Winter 2023: 2.973 Spring 2023: 3.066 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.027 Winter 2023: 0.00 - new members not listed Spring 2023: 3.485 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $2,300.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 AOD - 1 O - 3 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 24 PHI KAPPA PSI, ΦΚΨ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 21 Winter 2023: 9 Spring 2023: 16 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 6 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 5 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.183 Winter 2023: 3.366 Spring 2023: 3.207 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.923 Winter 2023: N/A Spring 2023: 3.415 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Bad Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 25 PHI LAMBDA RHO, ΦΛΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 26 Winter 2023: 23 Spring 2023: 21 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 7 Winter 2023: 4 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.425 Winter 2023: 3.373 Spring 2023: 3.304 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.662 Winter 2023: 3.254 Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 26 PHI SIGMA RHO, ΦΣΡ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 16 Winter 2023: 13 Spring 2023: 10 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 2 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.342 Winter 2023: 3.282 Spring 2023: 3.039 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.418 Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no. new members Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Bad Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $587.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 27 PHI ZETA TAU, ΦΖΤ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 12 Winter 2023: 14 Spring 2023: 16 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 3 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.067 Winter 2023: 3.078 Spring 2023: 3.285 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.857 Winter 2023: 2.589 Spring 2023: N/A - No new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Submission of Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 Total community service hours:56 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 28 PI ALPHA PHI, ΠΑΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE Current University Status: Inactive / Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 16 Winter 2023: 14 Spring 2023: 10 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 7 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.957 Winter 2023: 2.884 Spring 2023: 2.39 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.887 Winter 2023: N/A Spring 2023: N/A Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A Spring 2023: N/A Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Last meeting was Fall 2022 Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC)ulticultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 29 PI BETA PHI, ΠΒΦ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE PANHELLENIC ASSOCIATION (PHA) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 97 Winter 2023: 87 Spring 2023: 98 Number of New Members Fall 2022: failed to report - 31 Winter 2023: failed to report - 10 Spring 2023: 12 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.957 Winter 2023: 3.239 Spring 2023: 3.354 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: 3.32 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Winter 2023 chapter application submitted Total community service hours:1486 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $10,977.24 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 O - 1 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 30 PI KAPPA ALPHA, ΠΚΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Unrecognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 62 Winter 2023: N/A - suspended Spring 2023: N/A - suspended Number of New Members Fall 2022: 24 Winter 2023: N/A - suspended Spring 2023: N/A - suspended Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.055 Winter 2023: N/A - suspended Spring 2023: N/A - suspended Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.923 Winter 2023: N/A - suspended Spring 2023: N/A - suspended Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Not Met Winter 2023: N/A - suspended Spring 2023: N/A - suspended Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Bad Winter 2023: Bad Spring 2023: Bad Compliance with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Last meeting was Fall 2022 Total community service hours: 0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list not provided Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: AOD - 1 O - 2 Citations and Disciplinary categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - including Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit a Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: SUSPENDED 31 SIGMA CHI, ΣΧ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 82 Winter 2023: 85 Spring 2023: 83 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 27 Winter 2023: 6 Spring 2023: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.213 Winter 2023: 3.172 Spring 2023: 3.425 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.951 Winter 2023: 2.859 Spring 2023: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:216 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $2,000.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 O - 2 Citations and Disciplinary Categories Hazing (H) Alcohol & Other Drugs (AOD) Sexual Misconduct/Assault (SMSA) Other (O) - Disorderly/Lewd Conduct; Failure to Comply; Noise Complaints; Damage (Property/House); Chancellor Directives; Etc. CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 32 ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE Current University Status: Inactive Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 7 Winter 2023: 5 Spring 2023: 4 Number of New Members Fall 2022:1 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.179 Winter 2023: 3.209 Spring 2023: 3.201 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: Unavailable* Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Not Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Last meeting was Winter 2023 * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list not provided Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING UCI SFL SIGMA DELTA SIGMA, Σ Δ Σ MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC)Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 33 SIGMA LAMBDA GAMMA, ΣΛΓ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 1 Winter 2023: 1 Spring 2023: 1 Number of New Members Fal 2022l: 0 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023:1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: Unavailable* Winter 2023: Unavailable* Spring 2023: Unavailable* Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing did not participate due to chapter size Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ulticultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 34 SIGMA NU, ΣΝ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 18 Winter 2023: 20 Spring 2023:19 Number of New Members Fall 2022: failed to report Winter 2023: 2 Spring 2023: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.328 Winter 2023: 3.110 Spring 2023: 3.04 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2023: 3.750 Spring 2023: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:46 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 35 SIGMA OMICRON PI, ΣΟΠ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 18 Winter 2023: 21 Spring 2023: 18 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 3 Winter 2023: 5 Spring 2023: 3 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.858 Winter 2023: 2.632 Spring 2023: 3.018 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 2.222 Winter 2023: 2.545 Spring 2023: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Not Met Spring 2023: Requirement Not Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours: N/A Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $200.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING Multicultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC SIGMA PHI EPSILON, ΣΦΕ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 50 Winter 2023: 38 Spring 2023: 45 Number of New Members Fall 2023: 11 Winter 2023: failed to report - 8 Spring 2023: 2 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2023: 3.110 Winter 2023: 3.206 Spring 2023: 3.091 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 202: 2.957 Winter 2023: 0.00 - failed to report Spring 2023: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Probationary Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current, as of Spring 2023 chapter application submitted * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:0.0 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $0.00 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable): Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: Arroyo Vista Housing 1000 Arroyo Drive, Irvine, CA 92697-3935 No citations or sanctions for chapter Chapter Report Notes This chapter did not submit Philanthropy & Service form CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 37 SIGMA PI, ΣΠ INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 97 Winter 2023: 104 Spring 2023: 111 Number of New Members Fall 2022: failed to report - 29 Winter 2023: 7 Spring 2023: 9 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 2.975 Winter 2023: 3.177 Spring 2023: 3.059 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 0.00 - failed to report Winter 2023: 3.219 Spring 2023: 2.406 Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: Requirement Met Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Last meeting was Winter 2023 individual/chapter application submitted Total community service hours:261 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $7,784.20 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 38 SIGMA PI ALPHA, ΣΠΑ ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE MULTICULTURAL SORORITY & FRATERNITY COUNCIL (MSFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 69 Winter 2023: 68 Spring 2023: 68 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 35 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 0 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.132 Winter 2023: 3.192 Spring 2023: 3.212 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: 3.024 Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: Requirement Met Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: N/A - no new members Annual SFL Awards: Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Good Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Probationary Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 individual application submitted Total community service hours:20 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: N/A Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING ulticultura lS o r o r i t y and Fraternity C o u n c ilMulticulturalSororityandFraternity C o u n c il AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MSFC 39 TRIANGLE ANNUAL REPORT - UCI SORORITY & FRATERNITY LIFE INTERFRATERNITY COUNCIL (IFC) Current University Status: Active / Recognized Number of Members (Active + New Members) Fall 2022: 7 Winter 2023: 8 Spring 2023: 9 Number of New Members Fall 2022: 0 Winter 2023: 0 Spring 2023: 1 Chapter GPA (for all members - active & new members) Fall 2022: 3.278 Winter 2023: 3.072 Spring 2023: 2.990 Chapter GPA (for new members) Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: Unavailable* Compliance with New Member Education training Fall 2022: N/A - no new members Winter 2023: N/A - no new members Spring 2023: Requirement Met Annual SFL Awards: no submissions Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Standing Fall 2022: Probationary Winter 2023: Good Spring 2023: Good Engagement with 1:1 Chapter President Meeting Current as of Spring 2023 * - If a chapter has three (3) or fewer members, their information will not be shared for Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) compliance Total community service hours:40.5 hours Total philanthropic dollars donated/raised: $1,140.69 Chapter SFL Event Reporting list available here Address of Chapter House (if applicable):N/A Citations/Disciplinary sanctions: No citations or sanctions for chapter CURRENT CONDUCT STATUS: GOOD STANDING 40 A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES 203 Student Services 1 Irvine, CA 92697‑2200 8:00AM-4:00PM Crisis Care available 24/7 (949) 824-6457 UCI COUNSELING CENTER Consultation - by appt only (referral by UCI personnel) Preferred method for referrals: online referral form campussocialworker@uci.edu (949) 824-0101 OFFICE OF CAMPUS SOCIAL WORK UCI SFL A LIST OF AVAILABLEMENTAL HEALTHRESOURCES 501 Student Health Irvine, CA 92697-5200 On-campus psychiatric services, covered by Student Health Insurance Plan (SHIP) (949) 824-5301 STUDENT HEALTH CENTER Tailored directory of long- term off-campus therapists provided to UCI students in partnership with the Counseling Center (949) 824-6457 THE SHRINK SPACE UCI SFL 43 EXHIBIT  EXHIBIT  EXHIBIT  EXHIBIT  Student Life & Development ƈ HOME FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES — About Fraternities And Sororities FRATERNITIES AND SORORITIES AT THE BEACH — General Information Chapters on Campus Transparency Act (AB-524) PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS + CURRENT MEMBERS + FAQs Contact Us Resources & Reporting CLUB SPORTS & RECREATION + STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS + PROGRAMS, RESOURCES, & SERVICES + MENU Student Affairs Involvement Health & Wellness Student Communities Housing New & Future Students Future U ++ About Student Affairs Leadership & Organization Dining Services Student Accommodations Parents & Families of CSULB Students Testing Department Assessment & Evaluation Communications & Marketing + ASI Student Government Career Services Cultural & Identity Services Clubs & Organizations Men’s Success Initiative Beach Hillel Women's & Gender Equity Center ASI Beach Pride Events 22 West Media Free Speech + Counseling & Psychological Services Student Health Services Disability Services Food & Housing Services Student Academic Resources Student Recreation & Wellness Center CARES + Beach XP Educational Opportunity Program Guardian Scholars McNair Research Scholars Pregnant & Parenting Students Project Rebound TRiO Student Support Services Undocumented Students Services Veterans Services + Tours Student Orientation University Outreach & School Relations First Year Programs GEAR UP TRiO Educational Talent Search TRiO Upward Bound Program California Student Opportunity and Access Program (Cal-SOAP) Cookie Settings Reject All Accept All Cookies By clicking “Accept All Cookies” or closing this banner without selecting “Reject All,” you consent to the use of all cookies. To use only essential cookies, select “Reject All.” You may change your preferences at any time in Cookie Settings. Privacy Notice 7/9/26, 9:25 PM Transparency Act (AB-524) | California State University Long Beach https://www.csulb.edu/student-affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 1/5 CSULB HAZING INFORMATION & PREVENTION MEET THE TEAM EVENTS & ORGS CSULB > Student Affairs > Student Life & Development Transparency Act (AB-524) Campus Recognized Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act (AB-524) The Campus-Recognized Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act (AB 524; Sections 66310-66312 of California Education Code) requires each institution of higher education to include in the institution’s requirements for campus recognition of a campus-recognized sorority or fraternity, as defined, a requirement that the sorority or fraternity submit to the institution on or before July 1, 2025, and annually thereafter, specified information concerning the sorority’s or fraternity’s members and their conduct. MEMBERSHIP & RECOGNIZED STATUS 2025 - 2026 Academic Year Total Active Members - Total number of Active members from Fall and Spring semester and Active Members Total New Members - Total number of New Members from Fall and Spring Recognized Status Recognized: Chapterbis in good standing with thebUniversity. Recognized-Expanding: National Staff and/or Alumni arebworking with CSULB to start a new chapter by recruiting interested students. Unrecognized: Chapter is inactive or not recognized by the University.b Membership and Recognition Status - Meets Bill Requirements i, ii and vii Organization (Alphabetical Order)Total Active Members Total New Members Recognized Status Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority 14 5 Recognized Alpha Omicron Pi Sorority 49 9 Recognized Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity 12 0 Recognized Alpha Phi Sorority 124 11 Recognized Delta Chi Fraternity 55 7 Recognized Delta Delta Delta Sorority 121 13 Recognized Delta Gamma Sorority 127 0 Recognized Delta Sigma Theta Sorority 6 1 Recognized By clicking “Accept All Cookies” or closing this banner without selecting “Reject All,” you consent to the use of all cookies. To use only essential cookies, select “Reject All.” You may change your preferences at any time in Cookie Settings. Privacy Notice 7/9/26, 9:25 PM Transparency Act (AB-524) | California State University Long Beach https://www.csulb.edu/student-affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 2/5 Delta Zeta Sorority 127 11 Recognized Gamma Phi Beta Sorority 123 13 Recognized Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 7 0 Recognized Kappa Psi Epsilon Sorority 15 0 Recognized Kappa Sigma Fraternity 73 8 Recognized Lambda Theta Alpha Sorority 10 0 Recognized Lambda Theta Phi Fraternity 5 2 Recognized Omega Psi Phi Fraternity 2 3 Recognized - Expanding Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity 3 3 Recognized - Expanding Pi Kappa Phi Fraternity 85 13 Recognized Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 31 7 Recognized Sigma Chi Fraternity 45 10 Recognized Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority 6 4 Recognized - expanding Sigma Kappa Sorority 120 13 Recognized Sigma Lambda Beta Fraternity 9 3 Recognized Sigma Lambda Gamma Sorority 6 2 Recognized Sigma Pi Fraternity 104 10 Recognized Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity 27 10 Recognized Theta Chi Fraternity 67 8 Recognized Zeta Phi Beta Sorority 4 0 Recognized Zeta Tau Alpha Sorority 118 11 Recognized Unrecognized Organizations Organization (Alphabetical Order)Recognized Status Chi Delta Theta Sorority Unrecognized (Oct. 2024) Delta Lambda Phi Fraternity Unrecognized Delta Sigma Chi Co-Ed Fraternity Unrecognized Iota Phi Theta Fraternity Unrecognized Lambda Sigma Gamma Sorority Unrecognized (Aug. 2025) By clicking “Accept All Cookies” or closing this banner without selecting “Reject All,” you consent to the use of all cookies. To use only essential cookies, select “Reject All.” You may change your preferences at any time in Cookie Settings. Privacy Notice 7/9/26, 9:25 PM Transparency Act (AB-524) | California State University Long Beach https://www.csulb.edu/student-affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 3/5 Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI) Fraternity Unrecognized Phi Iota Alpha Fraternity Unrecognized Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity Unrecognized Phi Kappa Tau Fraternity Unrecognized (Dec. 2025) Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity Unrecognized (Jan. 2026) Sigma Phi Omega Sorority Unrecognized (May 2024) Theta Delta Beta Fraternity Unrecognized Zeta Beta Tau Fraternity Unrecognized (April 2024) Zeta Epsilon Tau Fraternity Unrecognized Zeta Mu Beta Fraternity Unrecognized Zeta Phi Rho Fraternity Unrecognized (April 2026) ACADEMICS  COMMUNITY SERVICE & FUNDS RAISED  CONDUCT STATUS  AFFILIATED CHAPTER HOUSES Organization Owned and/or Operated Residential Housing Residential Houses listed are owned and/or operated by established housing corporations that own the properties and take care for major upkeep and repairs. Disclaimer: Please remember that fraternity and sorority housing is not owned, controlled, managed, screened or inspected by CSULB.b AffiAAliated Chapter Houses - Meets Bill Requirements ix Organization (Alphabetical Order) Street Address, City, State, Zip-Code Alpha Omicron Pi Sorority 3980 8th Street, Long Beach, CA90804 Alpha Phi Sorority 3017 East 4th Street, Long Beach, CA 90814 Delta Delta Delta Sorority 3831 East 10th Street, Long Beach, CA 90804 Delta Gamma Sorority 773 Redondo Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804 Delta Zeta Sorority 148 Molino Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804 Gamma Phi Beta Sorority 2929 East Broadway, Long Beach, CA 90803 By clicking “Accept All Cookies” or closing this banner without selecting “Reject All,” you consent to the use of all cookies. To use only essential cookies, select “Reject All.” You may change your preferences at any time in Cookie Settings. Privacy Notice 7/9/26, 9:25 PM Transparency Act (AB-524) | California State University Long Beach https://www.csulb.edu/student-affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 4/5 Kappa Sigma Fraternity 730 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90813 Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 1211 Newport Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90804 Sigma Chi Fraternity 4205 E. 7th Street, Long Beach, CA 90814 Sigma Pi Fraternity 4121 East 4th Street, Long Beach, CA 90814 Theta Chi Fraternity 684 Redondo Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90814 MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCES   ™ 1250 BELLFLOWER BOULEVARD LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90840 562.985.4111 SAFETY AND SUPPORT COLLEGES DISCLOSURES ADDITIONAL RESOURCES By clicking “Accept All Cookies” or closing this banner without selecting “Reject All,” you consent to the use of all cookies. To use only essential cookies, select “Reject All.” You may change your preferences at any time in Cookie Settings. Privacy Notice 7/9/26, 9:25 PM Transparency Act (AB-524) | California State University Long Beach https://www.csulb.edu/student-affairs/student-life-development/transparency-act-ab-524 5/5 EXHIBIT  ` FRATERNITY & SORORITY LIFE ANNUAL ENGAGEMENT REPORT 2023-2024 STUDENT ACTIVITIES & EVENTS DIVISION OF STUDENT LIFE STUDENT AFFAIRS & ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT 2 Fraternity & Sorority Life Annual Engagement & Assembly Bill 524 Report Table of Contents Fraternity & Sorority Life ............................................................................................... 2 Annual Engagement & Assembly Bill 524 Report ........................................................... 2 Fraternity & Sorority Life at San Francisco State University ....................................... 3 Student Activities & Events .................................................................................... 3 Campus-Recognized Sorority & Fraternity Transparency Act: AB 524 ........................ 4 Chapter Management ................................................................................................ 5 Education & Safety ................................................................................................. 5 Title IX .................................................................................................................... 5 Hazing Prevention .................................................................................................. 5 Chapter Membership & University Recognized Status ............................................... 6 University Sanctioned Events ..................................................................................... 7 Chapter Affiliated Houses .......................................................................................... 8 Council Management ................................................................................................. 9 Community Grade Report ........................................................................................ 10 Conduct & Investigations ......................................................................................... 11 Student Organization/Club Conduct Procedures .................................................. 11 Reporting Complaints or Misconduct ................................................................... 11 Community Service .................................................................................................. 12 University Resources for Reporting & Wellness Resources ...................................... 13 3 Fraternity & Sorority Life at San Francisco State University The fraternity and sorority (Greek Life) community at San Francisco State University, a California State University, is diverse, encompassing national, regional, and local chapters that offer students opportunities to form lifelong bonds through brotherhood and sisterhood. With 31 active chapters and six Greek Councils, Greek Life provides enriching experiences that include giving back through community service, fundraising for important causes, and participating in both social and academic activities. These experiences foster personal growth, leadership and professional development, and create a sense of belonging, allowing students to build meaningful relationships and enhance their overall university experience while positively impacting both campus and the surrounding community. Student Activities & Events Student Activities & Events (SAE) at San Francisco State University fosters student engagement through diverse opportunities that promote personal growth, leadership, and community building. With over 280 student organizations, students can explore extracurricular interests ranging from cultural, academic, and professional clubs. The department supports the creation of campus-wide events, leadership programs, and campus traditions, empowering students to develop leadership skills through active involvement and build belonging and community across campus. Additionally, the Student Life Events Center (SLEC) at Annex 1, provides space for large-scale campus activities such as performances, conferences, and celebrations. For more details, visit Student Activities & Events. Greek Life at San Francisco State University has been a central part of the campus community since 1928, currently housing 30 recognized fraternities and sororities under several councils. These organizations foster personal growth, leadership, academic persistence, and social networking through a supportive community. Each Greek organization offers diverse values and principles, enabling members to develop skills and form lifelong bonds. For more details, visit Greek Life at SF State. The staff supporting Greek Life at San Francisco State University are dedicated professionals who provide guidance and resources for fraternities and sororities. They assist in leadership development, event planning, and adherence to university policies. The team works closely with chapter members and councils to foster a vibrant, inclusive community that promotes personal growth, academic achievement, and responsible citizenship. Their mission is to ensure a positive and enriching experience for all members of Greek Life. 4 For more information, visit Meet the Staff. Campus-Recognized Sorority & Fraternity Transparency Act: AB 524 The California State Legislature and Governor approved Assembly Bill No. 524 (AB 524; Sections 66310-66312 of the California Education Code) in September 2022. AB 524 requires each institution of higher education to include the institution’s requirements for campus recognition of a campus- recognized sorority or fraternity, as defined, a requirement that the sorority or fraternity submit to the institution on or before July 1, each year, specified information concerning the sorority’s or fraternity’s members and their conduct. Questions concerning AB 524 or any individual or community-related fraternity or sorority conduct, and the content outlined in this annual report can be referred to the offices listed below: Student Activities & Events Email: activities@sfsu.edu | Phone: 415-338-3060 Office: Student Services Building – Suite 301 Dean of Students Office Email: dos@sfsu.edu | Phone 415-338-2032 Office: Student Services Building – Suite 403 5 Chapter Management Recognized and active chapters at San Francisco State University are supported with opportunities to become engaged leaders, positively contributing to their organization and the campus community. Chapter leadership receives continuous guidance, support, and resources, enhancing their growth and activities throughout the year. Workshops and resources provided in collaboration with campus partners ensure the success and sustainability of the Greek Life community. Key programs and expectations include: x Annual Re-registration and Recognition x Student Leader Orientation Modules (SLO) x Monthly Chapter Executive Meetings x Registered Student Organization Summit (RSOS) x One-on-one Chapter President Meetings x Annual Greek Life Summit Education & Safety All registered organizations and clubs are required to complete the annual Student Leader Orientation (SLO). This provides an overview of university requirements for recognition, establishment of bylaws, understanding campus policies for events, and organizational operations. Student Activities & Events supports chapters with event planning, leadership development, conflict management, and navigating Time, Place, and Manner (TPM) policies for both on- and off-campus success. The Student Activities & Events Office collaborates with the following departments: Risk Management, Conference & Events Services, and University Police to ensure student safety for university sanctioned events. Title IX Recognized fraternity and sorority chapters must comply with Title IX regulations, promoting a safe, non-discriminatory environment for all members. Chapters receive annual training and additional trainings upon request or in coordination with university or CSU system-wide mandates, on preventing and addressing sexual misconduct, harassment, and gender-based violence to ensure that fraternity and sorority life remains supportive and inclusive. Annual training occurs at the Greek Summit each Fall semester in collaboration with the Office of Equity Programs & Compliance. Hazing Prevention Hazing prevention is a core focus of Greek Life. All chapters are educated on anti-hazing policies and the dangers associated with such behaviors. Through workshops, training, and university oversight, students are informed of the legal and ethical consequences of hazing, ensuring that all new member processes foster a positive and safe environment. 6 Chapter Membership & University Recognized Status MEMBERSHIP & RECOGNIZED STATUS Chapters Only Chapter | A-Z Active Members New Members Status 1 Alpha Gamma Delta 41 18 Active 2 Alpha Kappa Alpha 5 0 Active 3 Alpha Kappa Delta Phi 13 0 Active 4 Alpha Kappa Omega 5 0 Active 5 Alpha Kappa Psi Fraternity 9 5 Active 6 Alpha Phi 31 38 Active 7 Alpha Phi Alpha 5 0 Active 8 Alpha Pi Sigma 7 0 Active 9 Alpha Sigma Pi 14 13 Active 10 Chi Rho Omicron 5 0 Active 11 Delta Kappa Sigma 13 9 Active 12 Delta Sigma Pi 20 0 Active 13 Epsilon Sigma Rho 6 0 Active 14 Iota Phi Theta 2 0 Active 15 Kappa Alpha Psi 6 0 Active 16 Kappa Psi Epsilon 6 0 Active 17 Kappa Sigma 12 14 Active 18 Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority 5 0 Active 19 Lambda Theta Nu Sorority 6 4 Active 20 Lambda Theta Phi Latin Fraternity 4 1 Active 21 Nu Alpha Kappa Fraternity 5 6 Active 22 Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity 5 0 Active 23 Phi Kappa Tau 13 0 Active 24 Phi Sigma Sigma 46 14 Active 25 Psi Chi Omega 5 0 Active 26 Sigma Gamma Rho 5 0 Active 27 Sigma Lambda Gamma 5 0 Active 28 Sigma Pi Alpha 6 4 Active 29 Zeta Chi Epsilon Fraternity - - Active Suspension 30 Zeta Phi Beta 5 0 Active 7 University Sanctioned Events The Student Activities & Events coordinates with recognized fraternity and sorority organizations (Chapters) when approving and sanctioning all organizations’ events and activities. Below lists Chapter’s sanctioned events from 2023-2024 academic year. CHAPTER EVENTS Chapters Only Chapter | A-Z Number of Events 1 Alpha Gamma Delta 23 2 Alpha Kappa Alpha 9 3 Alpha Kappa Delta Phi 23 4 Alpha Kappa Omega - 5 Alpha Kappa Psi Fraternity - 6 Alpha Phi 35 7 Alpha Phi Alpha 6 8 Alpha Pi Sigma 6 9 Alpha Sigma Pi - 10 Chi Rho Omicron - 11 Delta Kappa Sigma 12 12 Delta Sigma Pi - 13 Epsilon Sigma Rho - 14 Iota Phi Theta - 15 Kappa Alpha Psi - 16 Kappa Psi Epsilon 8 17 Kappa Sigma - 18 Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority 5 19 Lambda Theta Nu Sorority 15 20 Lambda Theta Phi Latin Fraternity 8 21 Nu Alpha Kappa Fraternity - 22 Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity - 23 Phi Kappa Tau 48 24 Phi Sigma Sigma - 25 Psi Chi Omega - 26 Sigma Gamma Rho 4 27 Sigma Lambda Gamma 9 28 Sigma Pi Alpha - 30 Zeta Phi Beta 3 8 Chapter Affiliated Houses AFFILATED CHAPTER HOUSES Only Recognized Organizations Chapter | A-Z Street Address, City, State, Zip-Code - - San Francisco State University does not have any recognized fraternity or sorority organizations with affiliated/recognized chapter houses. 9 Council Management Student Activities & Events (SAE) advises six councils and their respective student leaders. Councils coordinate on Greek Life community related risk management, chapter development, event planning, recruitment and community expansion. The Greek Like Coordinate provides constructive support and advice opportunities for personal and professional leadership development for the student leaders. FRATERNITY & SORORITY COUNCILS Council Name Abbreviation Total Membership College Panhellenic Conference CPC 8 Interfraternity Council IFC 6 Latino Greek Council LGC 6 Multicultural Greek Council MGC 11 National Panhellenic Council NPHC 5 United Greek Council UGC 5 10 Community Grade Report AVERAGE GRADE POINT AVERAGE Cumulative GPA as of Fall 2024 Only Recognized Chapters Chapter | A-Z Total Active Members GPA Average 1 Alpha Gamma Delta 59 3.108 2 Alpha Kappa Alpha 5 2.854 3 Alpha Kappa Delta Phi 13 3.313 4 Alpha Kappa Omega 5 3.168 5 Alpha Kappa Psi Fraternity 14 3.348 6 Alpha Phi 69 3.196 7 Alpha Phi Alpha 5 3.230 8 Alpha Pi Sigma 7 3.196 9 Alpha Sigma Phi 27 2.875 10 Chi Rho Omicron (XPO) 5 2.640 11 Delta Kappa Sigma 22 3.050 12 Delta Sigma Pi 20 3.035 13 Epsilon Sigma Rho 6 2.910 14 Iota Phi Theta 2 * 15 Kappa Alpha Psi 6 2.745 16 Kappa Psi Epsilon 6 3.375 17 Kappa Sigma 26 2.573 18 Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority 5 2.826 19 Lambda Theta Nu Sorority 11 * 20 Lambda Theta Phi Latin Fraternity 5 * 21 Nu Alpha Kappa Fraternity 11 2.095 22 Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity 5 2.803 23 Phi Kappa Tau 13 2.919 24 Phi Sigma Sigma 60 3.075 25 Psi Chi Omega 5 2.534 26 Sigma Gamma Rho 5 3.015 27 Sigma Lambda Gamma 5 2.884 28 Sigma Pi Alpha 10 3.280 29 Zeta Phi Beta 5 2.724 *In compliance with the Family Educational Rights & Privacy Act (FERPA) we do not report organization’s grade point averages who have less than 5 members. 11 Conduct & Investigations Student Organization/Club Conduct Procedures All registered student organizations at San Francisco State University are required to adhere to the University's Recognized Student Organization Code of Conduct (RSOCC). This code ensures that all recognized fraternity and sorority chapters operate within university policies, maintaining the safety, health, and well-being of the community. Organizations are expected to uphold responsible behaviors, with violations potentially resulting in disciplinary action, including probation, suspension, or the loss of University recognition. Regular oversight and sanctions ensure accountability and compliance with university and legal standards. For full details, visit SF State's RSO Conduct Procedures. Reporting Complaints or Misconduct Anyone can submit a compliant via the RSO Complaint form or contact the Student Activities & Events Office at 415-338-3060 or activities@sfsu.edu CONDUCT STATUS Only Organizations with Violations Chapter | A-Z Conduct Status Zeta Chi Epsilon Suspended. Cannot be Considered for Recognition Until Fall 2026 The University takes allegations and reports of misconduct seriously, with any submitted reports potentially triggering an investigation. Violations may result in disciplinary actions, including probation, suspension, or the loss of recognition. Regular oversight ensures that all organizations remain accountable to university and legal standards. Questions concerning student or organization conduct can be referred to the Office of Student Conduct at conduct@sfsu.edu or 415-338-2032. More information can be found at conduct.sfsu.edu. 12 Community Service COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS + FUNDS RAISED Only Recognized Chapters Chapter | A-Z Hours of Service Funds Raised ($) 1 Alpha Gamma Delta 40 $7,651 2 Alpha Kappa Alpha 40 0 3 Alpha Kappa Delta Phi 500 $1,340 4 Alpha Kappa Omega 10 0 5 Alpha Kappa Psi Fraternity 0 $350 6 Alpha Phi 324 $2,500 7 Alpha Phi Alpha 0 0 8 Alpha Pi Sigma 15 0 9 Alpha Sigma Pi 12 $3,500 10 Chi Rho Omicron (XPO) 278 0 11 Delta Kappa Sigma 450 0 12 Delta Sigma Pi 0 0 13 Epsilon Sigma Rho 0 0 14 Iota Phi Theta 0 0 15 Kappa Alpha Psi Inc. 23 0 16 Kappa Psi Epsilon 390 $1,580 17 Kappa Sigma 0 $1,200 18 Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority 24 0 19 Lambda Theta Nu Sorority 15 0 20 Lambda Theta Phi Latin Fraternity 35 0 21 Nu Alpha Kappa Fraternity 200 $456 22 Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity 0 0 23 Phi Kappa Tau 1200 $4,600 24 Phi Sigma Sigma 2000 1$,500 25 Psi Chi Omega 0 0 26 Sigma Gamma Rho 145 $400 27 Sigma Lambda Gamma 243 $300 28 Sigma Pi Alpha 350 $1,260 29 Sigma Omicron Pi 0 0 30 Zeta Phi Beta 56 0 13 University Resources for Reporting & Wellness Resources CAMPUS RESOURCES Resources Include Referral, Advocacy, Case Management, and Mental Health and Trauma Support Department / Program Website Counseling & Psychological Services (CAPS) https://psyservs.sfsu.edu Dean of Students Office https://dos.sfsu.edu/ SFSU Psychology Training Clinic https://psychology.sfsu.edu/clinical/psychological-services Student Health Services https://health.sfsu.edu/ Equity Programs & Compliance https://titleix.sfsu.edu/ Office of Student Conduct https://conduct.sfsu.edu/ The SAFE Place https://dos.sfsu.edu/safeplace Equity & Community Inclusion https://equity.sfsu.edu/ EXHIBIT  Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act flfl         7/9/26, 9:39 PM Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act - Office of the Registrar - Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo https://registrar.calpoly.edu/content/stu_info/ferpa 1/2    © 2026 California Polytechnic State University ü ü San Luis Obispo, California 93407 Phone: 805-756-1111 7/9/26, 9:39 PM Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act - Office of the Registrar - Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo https://registrar.calpoly.edu/content/stu_info/ferpa 2/2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4906-8549-4204 v1 4 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT BURKE,WILLIAMS & S ORENSEN,LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as DECLARATION OF HAN-HSIEN MILETIC IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email: matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION:I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia EspinozaEspinoza 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES J. Leah Castella (SBN 205990) E-mail: lcastella@bwslaw.com Alexandra L. Mulhall (SBN 353051) E-mail: amulhall@bwslaw.com Han-Hsien Miletic (SBN 295957) E-mail: hmiletic@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 Attorneys for Respondents/Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO KATHIE WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JEFFREY ARMSTRONG, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Respondent/Defendant. Case No. 26CV-0166 DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH AIELLO-COPPOLA IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT Filed concurrently with Opposition to Motion for Judgment; Request for Judicial Notice Hearing Date: November 4, 2026 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 4 Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Tana L. Coates Department 4 Action Filed: March 18, 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 2 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH AIELLO-COPPOLA I, ELIZABETH AIELLO-COPPOLA, declare as follows: 1. I am over the age of 18, and I submit this declaration in support of the Opposition to the Motion for Judgment by Respondents/Defendants Board of Trustees of the California State University and Jeffrey Armstrong, in his official capacity as President of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (together, “Cal Poly”). Except as otherwise indicated, the facts set forth herein are known to me personally or have been determined by my review of official records and other documents that are maintained by Cal Poly. As to those matters stated on information and belief, I am informed and believe that they are true. If called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto. 2. I am now and at all relevant times herein have been employed by Cal Poly within the Student Affairs Office as Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Office (“FSL Office”). In my capacity as Assistant Director of the FSL Office, I advise fraternity and sorority organizations, oversee administrative processes, maintain official records, and communicate with students and university officials regarding fraternity and sorority matters. FSL Event Registration 3. The FSL Office oversees recognized Greek organizations (fraternities and sororities) and compliance with applicable University policies and laws as part of its broader mission to support student development and organizational accountability. 4. As part of that mission, the FSL Office implements an event registration process under which all events sponsored or endorsed by a recognized Greek organization must be registered with the FSL Office in advance. However, registration is not approval, and the FSL Office does not approve (or deny) events. A true and correct copy of the FSL Event Registration rules is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 5. Although events sponsored or endorsed by Greek organizations are required to be registered with the FSL Office, because the registration process is not an approval process, failing to register an event will not typically subject a Greek organization to any negative consequences unless some misconduct occurred at the event. In such cases, Cal Poly’s Office of Student Rights 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES & Responsibilities will use the fact of an event’s registration (or non-registration) with FSL to determine appropriate disciplinary consequences. For example, if there is a report of underage drinking at a Greek event that was not registered with FSL, the Greek chapter associated with the event could face sanctions. 6. To register an event, a student member of the organization submits a standardized FSL Event Registration form on behalf of the chapter. A true and correct copy of the most current version of the FSL Event Registration form (in outline view) is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Prior to June 2025, the FSL Office used a different version of the form. A true and correct copy of the pre-June 2025 version of the Event Registration form (in outline view) is attached hereto as Exhibit C . Prior to September 2024, the FSL Office used another version of the form. An outline view of the pre-September 2024 version of the form is no longer accessible to me, however, student submissions from pre-September 2024 demonstrate what that form looked like. A true and correct copy of a small sample of pre-September 2024 FSL Event Registration submissions (redacted for privacy purposes) is attached hereto as Exhibit D . 7. The form collects the student’s name and contact information, the organization’s name, the event date, time, title, and theme, whether alcohol will be present, and the event location. With respect to location, the versions of the form offered various choices for event location (e.g., on-campus, chapter facility, satellite house, third-party venue, or residence) and required the submitting student to provide the specific address of the event location. 8. The practical significance of the location field is straightforward: Cal Poly requires the address of every registered event so that it can later assess, if necessary (as described in paragraph 5 above), whether the event complied with university policies. 9. The FSL Office does not collect the addresses for any purpose beyond that administrative review. 10. In particular, Cal Poly does not independently investigate whether the submitting student lives at the address provided or whether any student lives at the address provided, does not verify the zoning status of off-campus addresses, and does not maintain the registration records as a database of student residences. Indeed, the post-2024 version of the form includes a reminder to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 4 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES students to independently check zoning requirements if an event is taking place at a residential location. 11. All addresses are provided by the student; Cal Poly simply receives and reviews it in the context of the event registration process. 12. All completed forms are maintained by the FSL Office. Compliance with the Campus-Recognized Sorority and Fraternity Transparency Act (“AB 524”) 13. Cal Poly (through the FSL Office, in consultation with other administrative departments) complies with Education Code sections 66310-66312 and discloses chapter house addresses in its AB-524 Campus Reports. 14. Cal Poly’s AB-524 Campus Reports have been published annually since October 2023. 15. Since June 18, 2024, Cal Poly has chosen not to publish addresses of satellite houses or residential event locations in its AB-524 Campus Reports. Cal Poly provides general location information for sanctioned events, not precise street addresses. 16. Although Cal Poly included some residential addresses in its 2023 report, the University has since reassessed the privacy and legal implications of disclosing residential addresses and revised its reports to remove residential address information that was not strictly required to be disclosed under AB 524. To that end, between June 18, 2024 and July 8, 2024, Cal Poly revised the 2023 report to remove precise street addresses for satellite houses or residential event locations. Code Enforcement Concerns 17. In my role as Assistant Director of FSL, I have participated in discussions among Cal Poly administrators regarding the City’s enforcement activities affecting fraternity and sorority houses. Based on those discussions and information provided to University administrators in the ordinary course of our responsibilities, I understand that students perceive the City of San Luis Obispo has increased its attention and enforcement actions on properties suspected of operating as unpermitted fraternity or sorority houses. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 5 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES 18. Based on students’ concerns, I am concerned about the potential chilling effect the City’s enforcement activities have on students’ willingness to participate in university safety programs as well as the effect on student privacy and perceptions of procedural fairness. 19. On or about September 25, 2025, student leaders informed me that City code enforcement officers attended a semi-private Greek recruitment event on Cal Poly's campus, representing their visit as educational in nature. Student leaders further reported to me that information gathered at that event was subsequently used to issue zoning violations to fraternity houses whose addresses appeared on recruitment materials distributed at the event. The reports resulted in numerous conversations with student leaders expressing concern about engaging with City personnel in University settings. 20. Student leaders informed me that numerous notices of violation were posted on student homes during the winter holiday break, even though the alleged violations had occurred months earlier. According to the students, the notices indicated that the appeal window had already closed, or would close, before most students returned from break. According to the students, some notices further suggested that students could challenge a citation if Cal Poly confirmed that no event had occurred, while simultaneously indicating that the university was unlikely to provide that confirmation. Student leaders expressed concern with the notices and sought assistance from the University regarding these notices. 21. Through my interactions with student leaders, I am aware that fraternities and sororities use the DoorList app to help manage attendance at events. In recent months, several chapter leaders informed me that they have stopped using the DoorList app because they believed the City was using information through that platform for enforcement purposes. I have also independently verified with DoorList that City code enforcement officials had been using the DoorList app, which suggests to me that the students’ concerns were justified and well-founded. 22. Based on my interactions with student leaders and discussions with University administrators, including Student Affairs personnel, and based on the concerns repeatedly expressed to me in my capacity as an FSL Office administrator, I am deeply concerned that disclosure of residential addresses contained in FSL Event Registration records would discourage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4927-4277-7020 v2 6 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT B URKE ,W ILLIAMS & S O RENSEN , LLP A TTO RNEYS A T L A W L O S A NG ELES students from participating fully in the FSL event registration process. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on this 10th day of July, 2026, at San Luis Obispo, California. Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola EXHIBIT A Revised September 2024 EVENT REGISTRATION PROCEDURE AllmembersofCalPoly-affiliatedfraternitiesandsororities,andtheInterfraternityCouncil, the Panhellenic Council,and the United Sorority &Fraternity Council at Cal Poly (collectively and Sorority shall abide by all University policies and federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including those that govern the use, distribution, and consumption of alcohol. This Event Registration Procedure sets forth procedures designed to provide a safe social atmosphere for members of the Greek Community and their guests, while allowing them to exercise the personalresponsibility expected of each of them. The following objectives are essential to achieving this aim: To encourage social responsibility in all members, with emphasis on safety and risk management; To encourage responsibility in the use of alcohol and thereby reduce the risks associated with alcohol misuse at parties; To increase the safety of everyone in attendance at chapter-sponsored events with and without alcohol; To support the ideals and values on which fraternities and sororities are founded; To practice self-governance as a Fraternity and Sorority Life Community; To educate the general membership of the Fraternity and Sorority Life community about the importance of risk management. 1 The University does not accept legal liability for the activities engaged inby fraternities and sororities, and their members. Revised September 2024 Table of Contents Article I - What defines an event? Article II - Legal Article III - Events with Alcohol Present Article IV - Events without Alcohol Present Article V - Locations Article VI - Registration Process Article VII - Judicial Article VIII - Amnesty Article IX - Procedure Revision Revised September 2024 Article I - What defines an event? A. endorsed by the organization/chapter including those that occur on and off chapter premises. Article II Legal A. Any event as defined above must be compliant with all applicable laws, including but not limited to the below requirements: a. The organization, members and guests must comply with all federal, state, and local laws. No person under the legal drinking age my possess, consume, provide or be provided alcoholic beverages b. Organizations, members and guests must follow the federal law regarding illegal drugs and controlled substances. No persons may possess, use, provide, distribute, sell and or manufacture illegal drugs or other controlled substances while on organizational/ chapter premises or at any activity or event which is sponsored or endorsed by the chapter B. Laws local toSanLuis Obispo are also enforced with events, including: a. Noise Ordinance i. 7 A.M. to 10 P.M.: Noise that can be heard 50 feet from the source is a violation ii. 10 P.M. to 7 A.M.: Noise that can be heard acrossthe property line is a violation b. Safety Enhancement Zones i. Fines are doubled for the following violations: 1. Noise 2. Unruly Gathering 3. Social Host Liability 4. Public Urination 5. Open Container ii. Designated times for Safety Enhancement Zones may vary, but typically occur during: 1. Mardi Gras (Thursday - Wednesday) 2. Day 3. Halloween 4. Week Revised September 2024 Article III Events with Alcohol Present A. Guest Lists and Sober Monitors a. Any event where alcohol is present is required to be a closed event, with guest lists submitted to the FSL office by the deadline (see Article VI) b. Attendance by non-members at any event where alcohol is present must be by invitation only by the organization. Chapters must utilize the guest list template provided by the FSL Office. Attendance at events where alcohol is present is limited to a guest-to-member ratio of 2:1 and must not exceed local fire or building code capacity of the organizational/chapter premises or host venue. c. Any event with alcohol present is also required to have sober monitors present, with quantity based on the number of guests in attendance. i. Three sober monitors (including one from the Executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum. ii. For every 40 guests invited to the event, another sober monitor will be required iii. First year members who have been in the chapter for at least one quarter and are initiated members, can serve as sober monitors if the following is in place: 1. Required attendance at one of the annual Social Risk Management workshops hosted the FSL office PRIOR to becoming eligible to serve as a sober monitor 2. Procedures in place attached to the risk management plan, that supports first year students during the event, should conflict arise 3. No more than 30 percent of sober monitors can be first year members B. Any event where alcohol is present can only occur from a. 5:00pm on Thursday until 1:00am on Friday, when Friday is an academic holiday b. 5:00pm on Friday until 1:00am on Saturday c. 9:00am on Saturday until 1:00am on Sunday d. 9:00am on Sunday until 1:00am on Monday, when Monday is an academic holiday C. Events with alcohol cannot occur until after the formal recruitment period is over (during quarters where there is a formal recruitment period) unless at a third- party vendor and the event is closed with no potential new members in attendance and follows all event registration guidelines. D. Events with alcohol are prohibited from lasting longer than five hours continuously E. Sources of Alcohol a. Alcoholic beverages must either be: i. Provided and sold by a licensed and insured third-party vendor, e.g., Revised September 2024 restaurant, bar, caterer, etc.) or ii. Brought by the individual members and guests through a bring your own beverage system. b. Common sources of alcohol, including bulk quantities, which are not being served by a licensed and insured third-party vendor, are prohibited (i.e. amounts of alcohol greater than what a reasonable person should consume over the duration of the event) c. The presence of alcohol products above 15% alcohol by volume (ABV) is prohibited on any organizational/chapter premises or at any event, except when served at an event by a licensed and insured third party vendor. d. Alcoholic beverages must not be purchased with organizational/chapter funds or funds pooled by members or guests (e.g., admission fees, cover fees, collecting funds through digital apps, etc.) F. Bring Your Own Beverage a. Only those of legal drinking age in California may bring and consume alcohol b. Permitted alcohol can only be made available in central common living areas managed by sober monitors designated by the host chapter c. Individuals of legal drinking age may bring beer totaling no more than 72 ounces (equivalent to a six pack of 12 oz beers) or one bottle (750 ml) of wine to the event G. Drinking Games a. No shots, drinking games, or other activities that encourage inappropriate or other rapid consumption or high-risk drinking behaviors shall be allowed. i. The definition of drinking games includes but is not limited to the consumption of shots of alcohol, liquor or alcoholic beverages; the or any other activityinvolving the consumption of alcohol which involves duress or encouragement related to the consumption of alcohol H. Consent Talks a. All events with alcohol are required to have a Consent Talk after 30 minutes and no later than 1 hour of the event starting. The Consent Talk will be Violence Prevention Chair (or a designated individual in the case that the Violence Prevention Chair be given to all participants at the event. If this is an exchange between two FSL organizations, both Violence Prevention Chairs should co-present the Revised September 2024 information. An example of the Consent Talk is below: Hi everyone, my name is _____ and I am the Violence Prevention Chair for (insert chapter here). We want everyone to have a great time tonight and feel safe & respected! I am going to give a brief consent talk before we continue with the rest of the night! Remember: 1.Consent is freely given: consent can only be given without coercion, force, threats, or intimidation. It cannot be given by someone who is incapacitated, including due to drugs, alcohol, or medication. 2.Consent is reversible: you can change your mind about anything at any time during sex. 3.Consent is informed: you must know what you are consenting to in order to give consent. 4.Consent is enthusiastic: when it comes to sex you should want to have it. 5.Consent is specific: saying yes to one thing, like making out, does not mean saying yes to everything, like having sex. [Add /women of high If you are interested in hooking up with someone tonight, check in with them and make sure to respect whatever answer they give you. If you see someone crossing a line, making others feel uncomfortable or someone in a vulnerable position, please come up to me or [insert the name of Chapter President or Risk Manager, whoever is comfortable] if you need absolutely anything at all, we will be at the door (or wherever you stand)! Thank you and have fun! I. Registration a. Events with alcohol are required to be registered with the FSL office prior to their occurrence andwith documents submitted prior to the required deadlines (further outlined in Article VI) Article IV Events without Alcohol Present A. Guest Lists and Sober Monitors a. Guest lists and sober monitors are not required for events where alcohol is not present, but are encouraged B. Registration a. Events without alcohol are required to be registered with the FSL office prior Revised September 2024 to their occurrence and with documents submitted prior to the required deadlines (further outlined in Article VI) Article V Locations A. All off-campus events with alcohol must be held at a residence, including a chapter facility, or a venue under third party management that is not legally associated with the -).. B. For all events with alcohol that are located at a third-party venue, a copy of the contract with the chapter and event management company or third-party venue must be submitted with the party registration. Article VI Registration Process A. The process of online events with alcohol registration must begin at least 10 days before the date of the event. B. Deadlines for completion of registration are every Thursday by 12:00pm the weekend of the event. C. A final follow up guest list must be submitted by 12:00 noon Monday following the eventwith alcohol, with the full names of all attendees and birthdates of all guests who received wristbands for alcohol consumption. a. No future eventswith alcohol will be reviewed until this requirement is fulfilled D. -event review, which is to be submitted to Cal Poly Fraternity and Sorority Life by 12:00 Noon the Wednesday following the event with alcohol. All sober monitors and sober executive members will contribute to this review. For events with alcohol where there may be more than one chapter acting as the eventhost, each chapter must complete a post- eventform. a. No future events withalcohol will be reviewed until this requirement is fulfilled E. Failure to follow these requirements may subject the chapter and/or its individual members to student discipline. Article VII Judicial A. Failure to follow these procedures will be reviewed by the Office of Student Rights & Responsibilities (OSRR) and may be subject to sanctions. B. It is recognized that this procedure cannot address, in specific fashion, all possible social Revised September 2024 situations that may occur. When this procedure is not specific on a particular point, the Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic Council, and United Sorority & Fraternity Council chapters and their members are expected to conduct their events and themselves in the spirit of social responsibility expressed in this procedure. C. Council judicial boards can also adjudicate if deemed necessary by the OSRR. Article VIII Amnesty A. As such, in cases of significant intoxication as a result of alcohol or other substances, the university encourages students to seek medical assistance for themselves and/or others. Any student who assists in seeking medical attention for a person in need, will not be subject to disciplinary action for conduct in violation of this policy. Article IX Procedure Revision A. This procedure may be revised at any time by the Fraternity & Sorority Life office, OSRR and Dean of Students. B. This procedure will be reviewed during summer quarter, or at the discretion of the Dean of Students staff, and any revisions will be sent to members of fraternities and sororities immediately and will be effective the first day of the following fall quarter. C. In the event of a mid-academic year review, any revisions will be sent to members of fraternities and sororities immediately upon implementation. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 BURKE, W ILLIAMS & SORENSEN , LLP A TTORNEYS AT L AW L OS A NGELES PROOF OF SERVICE Kathie Walker vs. Board of Trustees of the California State University, et. al. Case No. 26CV-0166 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942. On July 10, 2026, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH AIELLO-COPPOLA IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action as follows: Matthew S.L. Cate, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW S.L. CATE 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. No.: 415.964.4400 Email:matt@matthewcatelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATHIE WALKER BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the document(s) to be sent from e-mail address lespinoza@bwslaw.com to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 10, 2026, at Los Angeles, California. Leticia Espinoza 4 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Sunday, July 12, 2026 8:57 PM To:Neal Raghav Parthasarathy Cc:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola; Patino, Mallory Subject:RE: Request for IFC Special Event Permit for Fall 2026 Recruitment Hi Neal, Thank you – I hope you are having a great summer as well! I appreciate you reaching out and for your continued collaboration with the Interfraternity Council and the City as you prepare for Fall Recruitment. Without having much information on where the events are planned to be held, here is some initial guidance we can provide regarding permitting options for IFC recruitment activities: • Fraternity chapter houses may submit a Director’s Action application for a Temporary or Intermittent Use Permit (TUP) if the property already has an approved and active Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that allows special events. Outside of those circumstances, special events are not permitted in residential, agriculture, open space, or business park zones. A TUP application must include a Planning Application Form with signatures from all property owners, a project description, and site plan(s). Required findings from Municipal Code Sections 17.113.030 and 17.108.040 would apply to any TUP request. For events planned in early September, the timeline is extremely tight. The City must complete a 30-day completeness review, conduct required public noticing, and align with scheduled decision dates. The last available decision date before September 4 is August 24, which leaves very little room for processing. If you are thinking of having rush events in other locations: Events on public property, such as City parks, follow a separate permitting process through the Parks and Recreation Department. You may refer to the City’s “Reserving Facilities, Parks, & Getting Permits” information, or I can connect you with the correct staff. • Events on private property, like at a restaurant, depend on the site’s existing use and zoning. For example, renting a legally established event space (such as The Penny or the back room at Giuseppe’s) would fall within the parameters of that approved use and would not require additional permits. Temporary events or uses on private property may require a TUP if the activities “represent a variation from the normal business operations” (MC Section 17.156.040). Special events with a TUP are allowed in the PF, O, C-N, C-C, C-R, C-D, C-T, C-S, and M zones. I encourage you to touch base with Mallory Patino – CCd here if you have further questions. We are happy to support IFC in navigating the available permitting pathways and ensuring each chapter has clear guidance. Thank you! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development 5 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Neal Raghav Parthasarathy <nrpartha@calpoly.edu> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2026 3:39 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: Request for IFC Special Event Permit for Fall 2026 Recruitment Hi Timmi, I hope you're having a great summer! I wanted to reach out regarding IFC Fall Recruitment and ask whether it would be possible to pursue a single Special Event Permit for all IFC chapter recruitment activities, similar to the approach that Panhellenic is taking for their formal recruitment. Our Fall 2026 recruitment periods are scheduled for September 4 through 7 and September 12 through 14. Rather than having each individual chapter submit a separate permit application, we were wondering if the City would allow IFC to coordinate one Special Event Permit covering recruitment activities across participating chapter facilities, with the necessary property owner signatures collected as part of the process if required. We believe this approach would streamline the permitting process for both the City and our chapters while ensuring recruitment activities remain organized and compliant with City requirements. Could you let me know if this is something the City would be open to exploring? If there are any additional requirements, limitations, or considerations, such as Conditional Use Permit eligibility or other factors, we'd appreciate any guidance you can provide. Thank you for your continued collaboration and for your partnership with the Interfraternity Council. We appreciate your willingness to work with us, and we look forward to continuing our collaboration as we prepare for Fall Recruitment. Best, Neal Parthasarathy IFC President 6 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Friday, July 10, 2026 9:14 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Collins, Scott; McDonald, Whitney; Mezzapesa, John; Nelson, Trevor Subject:Summary of direction received during code enforcement study session BCC: Council_All Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, Thank you for the direction and thoughtful discussion during the study session on code enforcement priorities. Below is a summary of the guidance and direction we heard, along with a brief description of what each item may look like as staff begin shaping the work ahead. Keep current code enforcement response priorities and goal timelines in place.  What this looks like: Continuing to prioritize life-safety issues, safe housing, and high-impact cases while maintaining existing service level targets. Staff will continue to monitor case timelines and trends. Consider exploring changes to the code enforcement fine structure and fines.  What this may look like: Staff will conduct a review of existing fine structures and fines as well as recent changes in state law to determine if there are changes that are warranted to clarity and/or effectiveness. Changes to the fine structure may come forward as part of a work plan item for next budget cycle. Any changes would involve public hearings/outreach. Pursue internal work to identify efficiencies in the code enforcement team and processes to improve capacity as cases continue to rise  What this may look like: Staff will review workflows to reduce bottlenecks, identify areas where we can documentation and case tracking, evaluate technology tools, and assessing staffing structure to maximize capacity. Staff will identify opportunities to streamline processes and strengthen consistency, especially related to some of our most frequently addressed issues (shopping carts, etc.) Continue to enforce existing Greek house-related violations  What this may look like: We will continue to enforce our municipal code related to Greek housing when we receive complaints and/or concerns, ensuring consistent application of existing regulations, and providing clear communication to Greek organizations about expectations and compliance timelines. We will continue to work with Cal Poly to determine how to best get information to Fraternity and Sorority members about how to comply with the code, as well as to continue pursuing short and long term solutions to ongoing problems. Consider a work plan item for the next budget cycle to explore changes to Greek house-related regulations (requires public meetings and hearings)  What this may look like: This would involve a work plan item to be considered for next budget cycle. It would include reviewing current Greek house regulations, identifying gaps or enforcement challenges, engaging stakeholders, and developing potential regulatory updates for Council consideration. This would involve multiple opportunities for public engagement and meetings. Continue to focus on safe housing issues and address them as a high priority 7  What this looks like: Prioritizing inspections and enforcement for substandard housing when complaints are received. Staff will continue to push information out about code enforcement as a resource for safe housing concerns. Consider a future discussion on banning smoking in multifamily buildings  What this may look like: This may be included as a work program item for CDD during the next budget cycle, if further directed by Council to do so. Please let me know if you have any questions, Thank you Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 8 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Friday, July 10, 2026 9:09 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott Subject:RE: Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Thank you, Whitney I will get this out to council today, Timmi Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 6:35 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Hi Timmi, Thanks so much for putting this together and providing an opportunity to review. I have a couple of suggested modifications, which I’ve made to the body of the email below. Best, Whitney From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 8:40 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Hello Whitney and Scott, 9 Councilmember Francis has requested a summary of the direction given at the code enforcement study session. The following email is what I plan on sending all of council so everyone receives the same thing. Please let me know if any of what I have written below does not conform with your understanding of the direction (some of it was less clear than others during the meeting). I want to make sure the three of us are all in agreement. Thank you ____________________________________________________________________ 10  Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 11 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Thursday, July 9, 2026 6:35 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Collins, Scott Subject:Re: Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Hi Timmi, Thanks so much for putting this together and providing an opportunity to review. I have a couple of suggested modifications, which I’ve made to the body of the email below. Best, Whitney From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 8:40 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org> Subject: Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Hello Whitney and Scott, Councilmember Francis has requested a summary of the direction given at the code enforcement study session. The following email is what I plan on sending all of council so everyone receives the same thing. Please let me know if any of what I have written below does not conform with your understanding of the direction (some of it was less clear than others during the meeting). I want to make sure the three of us are all in agreement. Thank you ____________________________________________________________________ 12 Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 13 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Tuesday, July 7, 2026 8:41 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott Subject:Summary of Code Enforcement Study Session direction - email to council Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hello Whitney and Scott, Councilmember Francis has requested a summary of the direction given at the code enforcement study session. The following email is what I plan on sending all of council so everyone receives the same thing. Please let me know if any of what I have written below does not conform with your understanding of the direction (some of it was less clear than others during the meeting). I want to make sure the three of us are all in agreement. Thank you ____________________________________________________________________ 14 Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 15 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Sunday, June 28, 2026 5:17 PM To:Shoresman, Michelle; City Communications Cc:Nelson, Trevor; Mezzapesa, John Subject:RE: Media Request Regarding Fraternity CUPs Hi, Great question. Basically, I summarized for the newspaper the initial email John received from CP right after he submitted the report (thanking us for the report and stating that they would look into it but that they would not provide us with further information about if any further actions would occur or what they were). Other than that initial response, we have not received any other information about what they have done with the report that John provided. Thanks! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2026 7:04 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; City Communications <communications@slocity.org> Cc: Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <jmezzapesa@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Media Request Regarding Fraternity CUPs Thanks Timmi. The sentence in your response is a little confusing to me when you say you provided a summary of the response from Cal Poly to the City, but that they haven’t reported back on any of the issues John reported to them. So, does that mean the summary they have provided is nothing? In other words they haven’t reported back anything? Thanks. Michelle Shoresman Council Member City of San Luis Obispo 16 From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, 26 June 2026 12:20:05 To: City Communications <communications@slocity.org> Cc: Nelson, Trevor <tnelson@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <jmezzapesa@slocity.org> Subject: Media Request Regarding Fraternity CUPs BCC: Council All Hi all, I just provided Sadie Dittenber with the Tribune answers regarding some questions she posed about CUPs for Fraternities and Cal Poly’s response to Code Enforcement reporting to Cal Poly the code violations related to unpermitted fraternity activities (from December). I gave her an overview of the use permits we have left in the City and a summary of the response from Cal Poly to the City (and noting that we have not been provided additional information about the results of any investigations that Cal Poly did into the land use violations that John reported to them). I also provided a statement highlighting that we continue to enforce our zoning code, and will continue to work with Cal Poly to ensure neighborhoods are livable for all community members. Thank you, Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 32 From:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent:Monday, June 15, 2026 9:45 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Re: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Timmi, Thank you! Mallory reached out to me last week about it. I appreciate you following up! Best, Elizabeth Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Leadership & Service Fraternity & Sorority Life | Center for Leadership Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.signature_474445292 Schedule a meeting with me From: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, 15 June 2026 09:41:00 To: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Subject: RE: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Elizabeth, The planner working on this item should be in contact with you to address. Thanks! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:14 PM 33 To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Timmi, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to quickly as about the status of Kappa Kappa Gamma’s Conditional Use Permit? I know that they have been trying to get one since they moved into their new house last year. They are concerned about Sorority Recruitment coming up this Fall, and don’t want to host recruitment at their house without a permit. I also know they are really struggling to find another space that is cost effective. We have a meeting with them next week about other space options for them, but I wanted to check in to see if it was realistic for them to have a use permit by this August? Thank you so much! Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me 34 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Monday, June 15, 2026 9:41 AM To:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola Subject:RE: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Elizabeth, The planner working on this item should be in contact with you to address. Thanks! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:14 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Timmi, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to quickly as about the status of Kappa Kappa Gamma’s Conditional Use Permit? I know that they have been trying to get one since they moved into their new house last year. They are concerned about Sorority Recruitment coming up this Fall, and don’t want to host recruitment at their house without a permit. I also know they are really struggling to find another space that is cost effective. We have a meeting with them next week about other space options for them, but I wanted to check in to see if it was realistic for them to have a use permit by this August? Thank you so much! Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 35 Schedule a meeting with me 36 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Sunday, June 14, 2026 6:41 PM To:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola Subject:RE: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Elizabeth, Thanks for reaching out – I have forwarded this along to the planning team, which processes the permits for CUPs. I will check with them tomorrow and see if I can get you more information, Thanks! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:14 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Timmi, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to quickly as about the status of Kappa Kappa Gamma’s Conditional Use Permit? I know that they have been trying to get one since they moved into their new house last year. They are concerned about Sorority Recruitment coming up this Fall, and don’t want to host recruitment at their house without a permit. I also know they are really struggling to find another space that is cost effective. We have a meeting with them next week about other space options for them, but I wanted to check in to see if it was realistic for them to have a use permit by this August? Thank you so much! Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 37 Schedule a meeting with me 38 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, June 10, 2026 4:59 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:Fw: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Can you have the planner touch base with Elizabeth? Thanks! T Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Get Outlook for Android From: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:14:04 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Subject: Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Hi Timmi, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to quickly as about the status of Kappa Kappa Gamma’s Conditional Use Permit? I know that they have been trying to get one since they moved into their new house last year. They are concerned about Sorority Recruitment coming up this Fall, and don’t want to host recruitment at their house without a permit. I also know they are really struggling to find another space that is cost effective. We have a meeting with them next week about other space options for them, but I wanted to check in to see if it was realistic for them to have a use permit by this August? Thank you so much! Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me 39 From:Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola <eaielloc@calpoly.edu> Sent:Wednesday, June 10, 2026 2:14 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Subject:Kappa Kappa Gamma CUP Question Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Timmi, I hope you are doing well! I wanted to quickly as about the status of Kappa Kappa Gamma’s Conditional Use Permit? I know that they have been trying to get one since they moved into their new house last year. They are concerned about Sorority Recruitment coming up this Fall, and don’t want to host recruitment at their house without a permit. I also know they are really struggling to find another space that is cost effective. We have a meeting with them next week about other space options for them, but I wanted to check in to see if it was realistic for them to have a use permit by this August? Thank you so much! Best, Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola, M.A. pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Director, Fraternity & Sorority Life Leadership & Service | Student Affairs Cal Poly | San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 | 805-756-7263 Schedule a meeting with me 40 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Wednesday, June 3, 2026 12:03 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Cc:McDonald, Whitney; Hermann, Greg; Collins, Scott; Scott, Rick; Floyd, Aaron; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Harris, Randy; Karen Houston Tillman; Jennifer L. Haft Subject:FW: What a Year It Has Been! Bcc: SLO City Council Good afternoon Councilmembers, As another academic year comes to a close, I wanted to share a message from President Armstrong highlighting some of Cal Poly’s accomplishments over the past year. While much of this work occurs on campus, many of the outcomes directly benefit our broader community—from student volunteer service and workforce development partnerships to housing, innovation, economic development, and continued collaboration with you and other partners across the region. I hope you find this overview helpful, and thank you for your continued partnership and support of Cal Poly. Warmly, Courtney Courtney Kienow Senior Director of Economic Development Innovation, Industry and Economic Development Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu From: state-cp-staff-request@calpoly.edu <state-cp-staff-request@calpoly.edu> on behalf of PresidentsOffice@calpoly.edu <PresidentsOffice@calpoly.edu> Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 9:30 AM To: Subject: What a Year It Has Been! To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.The Cal Poly logo and Office of the President Faculty, Staff and Students, What a year it has been! 41 As we wrap up our final quarter at Cal Poly, I encourage you to pause and reflect on all we accomplished together during the 2025–26 academic year. The Semester Conversion project immediately comes to mind, but the list of achievements is long. Here are just a few highlights: We celebrated 125 years since our founding with events and activities that showcased our enduring ability to evolve, innovate and improve with each passing year. We made significant strides in integrating with Cal Poly Maritime Academy, sharing ideas and resources across campuses as we continue learning and growing together as one team. As part of that effort, our Academic Senates and student government organizations unified. We proudly celebrated the final graduating class of Cal Maritime and advanced equity and inclusion through initiatives such as the Women in Maritime Conference and the conferral of an honorary degree upon Capt. Kate McCue (Business Administration ’00). Our campus environment evolved and expanded in remarkable ways. We reopened Kennedy Library following its major renovation; we broke ground on the Lynda and Stewart Resnick Student Success Center; and we made great strides on construction of new faculty and staff housing and the first of several new residence halls. We transformed Building 15 into the Mustang Commons, a new home for our cultural centers and other student support services. We expanded our Tech Park and relocated our downtown bookstore to a more visible location in San Luis Obispo. And we continue work on a new pier at the Solano Campus in anticipation of the arrival of the Training Ship Golden State in 2027. So far this academic year, our students documented 111,425 volunteer hours through the Center for Service in Action, College Corps and Fraternity and Sorority Life on the San Luis Obispo campus and the Community Engaged Learning Center at Cal Poly Maritime Academy. These service hours provide a tangible economic benefit and direct support for community priorities including education, food security, climate service, and health and well-being. We expanded access and opportunity for students by broadening our Bachelor’s Pathways Programs with Cuesta College and Allan Hancock College. We embraced emerging technologies and innovation across the university. We hosted both an AI Convening in the fall and an AI Symposium in the spring. We also purchased an NVIDIA-powered AI Factory, which is now up and running. Our students built our first solid-state laser and launched a CubeSat into space — just two examples among many extraordinary technology-driven projects. Student-athletes achieved tremendous success, capturing 11 Big West championships and earning the Big West Commissioner’s Cup. Our club sports teams had equally winning seasons! The Athletics program expanded to include NCAA teams in stunt and flag football, and we are on the cusp of opening the new John Madden Football Center. Our national reputation continues to rise, with recognition from Forbes, U.S. News & World Report and Money magazine. Our Rose Parade float earned the prestigious 42 Sweepstakes Trophy, while students and faculty across our campuses received top honors in numerous fields, including Emmy Awards and Fulbright Fellowships. We watched with awe as Victor Glover (Engineering ’99) and his crewmates circled the moon and safely returned to Earth, and we eagerly anticipate welcoming him back to his alma mater. And, of course, we had fun together. Morning on the Green was a tremendous success, and the sold-out Poly Royal Rodeo brought excitement and energy to our campus community. The accomplishments of this year are truly extraordinary. I could not be prouder of this university and of the faculty, staff and students who make Cal Poly such a special place. Thank you for all you have contributed to our success. To our colleagues aboard Golden Bear, I wish you fair winds and following seas. To our San Luis Obispo campus, I wish you a wonderful final few days of the quarter and all the best for a restful and rewarding summer. See you in August! Jeffrey D. Armstrong President Privacy Notice · Web Accessibility Statement © 2025 California Polytechnic State University 43 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 6:39 PM To:Courtney Leigh Kienow Cc:McDonald, Whitney; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Terrance Leshae Harris; Jennifer L. Haft Subject:Follow up: SLO City Council Meeting Bcc: SLO City Council Dear Mayor Stewart and SLO City Council members, Thank you for the thoughtful conversation on Tuesday night. We wanted to follow up on a few items that came up during the meeting. Regarding the comment about a Battle of the Bands competition in the neighborhoods — we take this seriously. We reviewed our registry and found no record of that activity being disclosed to us, but that doesn't change our responsibility to act. We have followed up with all fraternity and sorority leaders to reinforce that live music events in the neighborhoods are strictly prohibited. This is not new information for them. There are several ways that both city staff and Cal Poly staff routinely communicate these rules. We will continue looking for ways to strengthen those communications. On the request for more information about investigations and findings from the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities — we will follow up on this within the next few weeks. Regarding the noise and party citation data we referenced: those figures came from two sources — the staff report on the item, and the annual police report — both of which are included below my signature for your reference. We know there a different departments and ways that noise violations are handled within the city but this is notable data. Over the last decade, "noise party" violations in SLO have dropped by hundreds — even as both the city and Cal Poly have grown by thousands of residents and students. Social noise or noise party citations fell from 448 in 2015 to 180 in 2024. Even with an uptick in 2025, we're still far below where we've been. That is not an accident. That is the result of intentional partnership. We want to be clear that we raised that data not to minimize the work that remains, but to recognize what intentional partnership has and can accomplish, and to build on it. Over the past year, university leadership has met intensively and regularly with City leadership. We've done the same with our fraternity and sorority leaders. We've brought together cross-departmental content experts to dig into our policies and communications. Those meetings have produced real changes, including but not limited to: • Noise violations have dropped significantly over the last 20 years, with the largest single drop tied directly to an increase in on-campus housing. We are adding about 4,000 beds over the next few years — a project that will cost over $1 billion — delivering on our continued commitment to grow housing faster than enrollment. • Cal Poly is now holding students accountable for certain off-campus behaviors through our Interfraternity Judicial Council, with a clear enforcement ladder from friendly reminders up through formal investigation and real consequences. • We are exploring long-term housing solutions for fraternities and sororities, including potential residential blocks in campus housing for second-year students in Greek organizations. • We are working with the Chancellor's Office to update on-campus alcohol policies and open more spaces for student events and activities. • We have added language in our event registration process to clearly communicate the city's policies and land use requirements. 44 • City leadership is invited to — and does — speak directly with our Greek organizations about neighborhood rules and regulations. • We are investing in mediation services alongside the city to train students and give them tools to resolve disagreements with neighbors. In addition to this partial list of changes we’ve made to work with the city on this issue related to student activity in the neighborhoods, we also have a group of student researchers evaluating how other similarly positioned cities and universities handle these issues — looking at their data and what we can learn from them. Our goal is to be intentional and strategic about ways to ensure that our entire Cal Poly community has a wholly positive impact in our neighborhoods and are known to be good neighbors. We remain committed to ongoing collaboration and to keeping these conversations going — always with an eye toward making our community the best it can be. Thank you again for your time. Courtney Courtney Kienow Senior Director of Economic Development Innovation, Industry and Economic Development Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 45 46 47 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Thursday, May 28, 2026 12:08 PM To:McDonald, Whitney Subject:Follow up: SLO City Council Meeting Hi Whitney - Please let me know if you see any red flags or have concerns. I am hoping to get this to them by end of day. Dear Mayor Stewart and SLO City Council members, Thank you for the thoughtful conversation on Tuesday night. We wanted to follow up on a few items that came up during the meeting. Regarding the comment about a Battle of the Bands competition in the neighborhoods — we take this seriously. We reviewed our registry and found no record of that activity being disclosed to us, but that doesn't change our responsibility to act. We have followed up with all fraternity and sorority leaders to reinforce that live music events in the neighborhoods are strictly prohibited. This is not new information for them. There are several ways that both city staff and Cal Poly staff routinely communicate these rules. We will continue looking for ways to strengthen those communications. On the request for more information about investigations and findings from the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities — we will follow up on this within the next few weeks. Regarding the noise and party citation data we referenced: those figures came from two sources — the staff report on the item, and the annual police report — both of which are included below my signature for your reference. We know there a different departments and ways that noise violations are handled within the city but this is notable data. The way we’re reading it, over the last decade, "noise party" violations in SLO have dropped by hundreds — even as both the city and Cal Poly have grown by thousands of residents/students. Social noise or noise party citations fell from 448 in 2015 to 180 in 2024. Even with an uptick in 2025, we're still far below where we've been. That is not an accident. That is the result of intentional partnership. We want to be clear that we raised that data not to minimize the work that remains, but to recognize what intentional partnership has and can accomplish, and to build on it. Over the past year, university leadership has met intensively and regularly with City leadership. We've done the same with our fraternity and sorority leaders. We've brought together cross-departmental content experts to dig into our policies and communications. Those meetings have produced real changes, including: • Noise violations have dropped significantly over the last 20 years, with the largest single drop tied directly to an increase in on-campus housing. We are adding about 4,000 beds over the next few years — a project that will cost over $1 billion — delivering on our continued commitment to grow housing faster than enrollment. • Cal Poly is now holding students accountable for certain off-campus behaviors through our Interfraternity Judicial Council, with a clear enforcement ladder from friendly reminders up through formal investigation and real consequences. • We are exploring long-term housing solutions for fraternities and sororities, including potential residential blocks in campus housing for second-year students in Greek organizations. • We are working with the Chancellor's Office to update on-campus alcohol policies and open more spaces for student events and activities. • We have added language in our event registration process to clearly communicate the city's policies and land use requirements. 48 • City leadership is invited to — and does — speak directly with our Greek organizations about neighborhood rules and regulations. • We are investing in mediation services alongside the city to train students and give them tools to resolve disagreements with neighbors. In addition to this partial list of changes we’ve made to work with the city on this issue related to student activity in the neighborhoods, we also have a group of student researchers evaluating how other similarly positioned cities and universities handle these issues — looking at their data and what we can learn from them. Our philosophy is to be intentional and strategic about ways that our entire Cal Poly community has a wholly positive impact in our neighborhoods and are known to be good neighbors. We remain committed to ongoing collaboration and to keeping these conversations going — always with an eye toward making our community the best it can be. Thank you again for your time. Courtney Courtney Kienow Senior Director of Economic Development Innovation, Industry and Economic Development Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA _____ office 805-756-6000 direct 805-756-6098 www.calpoly.edu 49 50 53 From:Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu> Sent:Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:28 AM To:Marx, Jan; Jason Mockford Cc:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); McDonald, Whitney; Stewart, Erica A Subject:Re: Cal Poly representation is invited to tonight's City Council Meeting Good morning Council member Marx, Yes. VP of Strategic Enrollment Management and Student Affairs Terrance Harris, myself and a few other student affairs and sorority and fraternity life leaders will be there and plan to speak to some of the issues. Best, Courtney From: Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org> Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 9:22 AM To: Courtney Leigh Kienow <ckienow@calpoly.edu>; Jason Mockford <jmockfor@calpoly.edu> Cc: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org> Subject: Cal Poly representation is invited to tonight's City Council Meeting Hello, Will anyone from Cal Poly administration attend tonight’s Code Enforcement study session? I hope so, since an important issue we will be considering is how best to regulate Cal Poly fraternity activity in residential neighborhoods. Thank you for getting back Jan Jan Marx pronouns she/her/hers Council Member Office of the City Council 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E jmarx@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 57 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Thursday, May 21, 2026 4:40 PM To:Dietrick, Christine; Collins, Scott; Kersten, Markie; Symens, Sadie Subject:RE: Neighborhood Livability / Code Enforcement Study Session 5/26/2026 Yes please, maybe just 30 min….let me find some time. Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dietrick, Christine <cdietric@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 2:53 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Collins, Scott <SCollins@slocity.org>; Kersten, Markie <mkersten@slocity.org>; Symens, Sadie <ssymens@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Neighborhood Livability / Code Enforcement Study Session 5/26/2026 Fyi, if we want to discuss. I have some time tomorrow if needed. Christine Dietrick pronouns she/her/hers City Attorney City Attorney's Office 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E cdietrick@slocity.org T 805.781.7140 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the CONFIDENTIAL use of the designated addressee named above. The information transmitted is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or represents confidential attorney work product. Recipients should not file copies of this email with publicly accessible records. If you are not the designated addressee named above or the authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the designated addressee, you received this document through inadvertent 58 error and any further review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by you or anyone else is strictly prohibited. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONING THE SENDER NAMED ABOVE AT (805) 781-7140. Thank you. From: Dave Congalton <dcongalton@americangeneralmedia.com> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 12:59 PM To: kathie walker < Cc: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org>; Marx, Jan <jmarx@slocity.org>; Francis, Emily <EFrancis@slocity.org>; Stewart, Erica A <estewart@slocity.org>; Boswell, Mike <MBoswell@slocity.org>; Shoresman, Michelle <mshoresm@slocity.org>; Advisory Bodies <advisorybodies@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Neighborhood Livability / Code Enforcement Study Session 5/26/2026 Let me know if you wanna come in next week and discuss Dave Congalton KVEC News/Talk 920 AM and 96.5 FM 3620 Sacramento Drive Suite #204 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 920kvec.com Author of "Man About Town: Stories of San Luis Obispo." Available through Amazon and Audible On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 12:52 PM kathie walker < wrote: CC. Planning Commission San Luis Obispo City Council, I have attached a report after going through public records for the past several months related to code enforcement and fraternity use since the problem was first brought to the Community Development Department's attention in 2023. It is relevant to the upcoming study session on code enforcement and Greek life, and neighborhood livability. I apologize for the length of the report. It contains records and other important information to support the position that the City Council should not direct staff to de-prioritize or pull back on enforcement of unlawful fraternity operations within neighborhoods, which seems to be the implied direction in the agenda, nor should it direct staff to study or develop zoning changes that would permit or expand fraternity use in residential neighborhoods, including an overlay zone that is more permissive than conditions set forth in fraternity Conditional Use Permits issued as recently as two years ago. 59 I have attached an Editorial written by the Tribune Editorial Board in 2025. Things have not improved in the neighborhoods and the residents are depending on our elected representatives to do the right thing and direct City staff to enforce the zoning laws, abate the nuisance properties from continuing to operate and disrupt the neighborhoods so that the City's residents can have safe and livable conditions. Thank you, Kathie Walker 60 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 4:51 PM To:McDonald, Whitney; Collins, Scott Subject:FW: IFC Proposal and Recommendations for May 26 Study Session Attachments:IFC Proposed Solutions - May 26th Study Session.pdf FYI – they will also be sending to council. Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Neal Raghav Parthasarathy <nrpartha@calpoly.edu> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2026 4:05 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org>; Mezzapesa, John <jmezzapesa@slocity.org> Subject: IFC Proposal and Recommendations for May 26 Study Session Hi Timmi and John, Thank you both for continuing to work with IFC, providing guidance, maintaining open communication, and allowing us the opportunity to express our thoughts and ideas throughout this process. We truly appreciate the time and effort both of you have dedicated to helping us navigate these discussions and prepare for the May 26th special meeting. IFC has prepared a document outlining the changes and recommendations we would like to see considered, and we wanted to share it with both of you in advance of our presentation on the 26th. We appreciate your willingness to review our ideas ahead of time and your continued guidance throughout this process. We will also be sharing our comments directly with Council, both in writing and verbally, prior to and during the meeting. Thank you again for your support and collaboration. Best, Neal Parthasarathy Cal Poly IFC President Dear Mayor Stewart and City Council Members, My name is Neal Parthasarathy and I am the Cal Poly Interfraternity Council (IFC) President. Thank you for letting me share my thoughts and ideas. Our fraternity chapters should not be exempt from City rules. If a chapter violates the noise ordinance or creates a legitimate public safety issue, enforcement should absolutely follow. Interfraternity Council (IFC) fully supports enforcement when there are repeated incidents of noncompliance or situations where neighboring residents are genuinely impacted. Our concern is whether enforcement is being applied fairly, equally and consistently across the community. During Fall 2025 recruitment, Interfraternity Council (IFC) chapters on one side of East Foothill Boulevard received citations. At the same time, Panhellenic Association (PHA) chapters were having their recruitment activities in a nearby area but they did not receive similar citations. This created the appearance of unequal treatment between similar student organizations. Because of concerns like this, IFC believes enforcement related to gatherings should primarily be complaint driven unless there is a clear and immediate threat for public safety. IFC also believes enforcement standards should be applied consistently across all organizations and residences rather than through fraternity specific oversight structures. IFC also has concerns about how the City uses chapter apparel, flags, composites, recruitment materials, guest list systems, public recruitment dates, and social media as indicators for enforcement. IFC members were told visible Greek Life materials could be used to identify what the City considers an “illegal fraternity.” Because of this, IFC recommends that citations should not be based solely on symbols, apparel, recruitment activity, social media, or assumptions tied to organizational affiliation. Enforcement should instead focus on verified conduct and actual violations. IFC acknowledges that historically much of the City’s enforcement has been complaint driven and responsive to neighborhood concerns. However, many student organizations feel enforcement has increasingly shifted toward a more proactive and targeted strategy focused on monitoring fraternity related activity before any actual complaint, neighborhood disruption, or public safety concern occurs. One related concern we have has to do with the DoorList app which IFC uses as a guest-list management tool: a critical safety function for our events, ensuring only intended guests are allowed entry and that a verifiable log of attendees is in place for any post-event questions or needs. In late Winter Quarter 2025, a Code Enforcement Officer accessed the DoorList app in order to view fraternity guest lists and identify social events connected to specific addresses. Although the app’s guest list settings were not properly restricted and allowed individuals outside the Cal Poly environment to join, many students were uncomfortable with guest list information being used in this way for enforcement purposes. Administrative citations and land use violations were later issued, with some fines exceeding $2,600. IFC believes administrative event management tools and guest list systems should not themselves become the basis for enforcement action. Student organizations should be able to use risk management and guest management systems without concern that those tools are being monitored in ways that discourage lawful organizational activity. IFC also has concerns regarding delayed and escalating enforcement processes. In Winter 2025, Delta Chi reportedly received a noise citation approximately three minutes after quiet hours began during a situation involving only a small number of students playing basketball. That citation later became the basis for a CUP review process costing the organization more than $8,000 in legal fees. Because San Luis Obispo is a college town with a large student population surrounding California Polytechnic State University, IFC believes noise enforcement policies should realistically reflect the nature of student life while still protecting neighboring residents and addressing legitimate public safety concerns. IFC therefore recommends maintaining unrestricted activity standards from 7 AM to 10 PM on weekdays and until 12 AM on Fridays and Saturdays while continuing overnight property line enforcement standards from 10 PM to 7 AM on weekdays and 12 AM to 7 AM on Fridays and Saturdays. IFC also recommends encouraging officers to issue verbal warnings and provide a reasonable 15 to 30 minute correction window before issuing citations when there is no immediate safety threat. Organizations that proactively cooperate with officers and immediately correct issues should receive consideration before escalating penalties are imposed. IFC also recommends limiting enforcement to one citation for a single ongoing violation at a time. Fines should be capped and sequenced to give fraternities a reasonable opportunity to comply, before more penalties are imposed. In practice, this would mean: ● A backyard BBQ with music playing at a moderate level during the afternoon would not automatically risk a citation just because it is audible from the sidewalk or a nearby yard. ● A birthday party hosted by students with people talking, laughing, and music during early evening hours would not be treated as a violation unless it becomes genuinely disruptive or excessive. ● A fraternity hosting a philanthropy or recruitment-related social event during the day could operate without constant concern that routine activity will trigger enforcement based solely on audibility at the property line. ● Normal weekend activities like people coming and going, music at reasonable levels, and social interaction would be treated as normal and expected things in a college-town residential environment. Also, land use notices related to Fall 2025 recruitment were reportedly posted during winter break when most students were out on winter break, and nearly three months after the alleged incidents occurred, with multiple citations placed on single notices. IFC believes citations should be issued within a reasonable timeframe, such as 48 to 72 hours after the alleged violation, so organizations have a fair opportunity to respond and correct issues. IFC also believes the City should eliminate fraternity specific CUP requirements and the current fraternity definition within municipal code. IFC members were told that any organization meeting the City’s definition could theoretically be treated similarly to a fraternity, yet IFC has not seen this applied consistently in practice. This creates confusion for both Greek Life and other student organizations. No student organization should be presumed responsible for unrelated conduct simply because activity involves students near campus. Rather than maintaining a separate long term oversight structure tied specifically to fraternity identity, IFC believes the City should focus on consistent behavior based enforcement standards applied equally across the community, similar to cities like Santa Barbara where fraternities are referenced more generally within broader zoning definitions. From our review of different municipal code structures, San Luis Obispo seems to have a more ongoing fraternity specific CUP oversight system than some other California college communities, including Santa Barbara and Isla Vista near University of California, Santa Barbara. IFC believes SLO should continue moving toward a more behavior focused approach that still protects residents while recognizing the realities of a college town. Finally, IFC encourages the City to evaluate whether zoning and land use policies around California Polytechnic State University realistically reflect the presence of a large 18 to 22 year old student population. Approximately one third of San Luis Obispo residents are Cal Poly students, representing roughly 14,000 people living within the community. A college town functions differently from a traditional suburban neighborhood, and land use policy should recognize that reality while still protecting residents and addressing legitimate safety concerns. Student oriented areas should support a positive and realistic college environment within reasonable community standards. For example, California State University, Chico utilizes a fraternity and sorority housing overlay approach near campus that recognizes the unique realities of student living patterns and university adjacent housing. IFC recommends that the City explore similar planning tools, including the potential creation of a broader student overlay zone in appropriate areas near campus. A student overlay zone could establish tailored standards and expectations that better reflect the realities of a college community, while still addressing neighborhood compatibility, safety, noise, and accountability concerns. Looking at approaches like Chico’s could help San Luis Obispo better balance long term neighborhood interests with the realities of a large student population. Taken together, IFC’s recommendations are intended to promote fair, consistent, and behavior based enforcement standards across the community. These recommendations include prioritizing complaint driven enforcement, encouraging warnings and opportunities for corrective action before escalating penalties, limiting identity based enforcement practices, eliminating fraternity specific CUP oversight structures, and ensuring zoning and land use policies realistically reflect the realities of a college community while still protecting residents and addressing legitimate public safety concerns. At the end of the day, IFC is simply asking for fairness, consistency, and equal application of the rules. Enforcement should be based on conduct, not identity. Thank you, Neal Parthasarathy Cal Poly Interfraternity Council (IFC) President 61 From:Neal Raghav Parthasarathy <nrpartha@calpoly.edu> Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2026 4:05 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Mezzapesa, John Subject:IFC Proposal and Recommendations for May 26 Study Session Attachments:IFC Proposed Solutions - May 26th Study Session.pdf Hi Timmi and John, Thank you both for continuing to work with IFC, providing guidance, maintaining open communication, and allowing us the opportunity to express our thoughts and ideas throughout this process. We truly appreciate the time and effort both of you have dedicated to helping us navigate these discussions and prepare for the May 26th special meeting. IFC has prepared a document outlining the changes and recommendations we would like to see considered, and we wanted to share it with both of you in advance of our presentation on the 26th. We appreciate your willingness to review our ideas ahead of time and your continued guidance throughout this process. We will also be sharing our comments directly with Council, both in writing and verbally, prior to and during the meeting. Thank you again for your support and collaboration. Best, Neal Parthasarathy Cal Poly IFC President Dear Mayor Stewart and City Council Members, My name is Neal Parthasarathy and I am the Cal Poly Interfraternity Council (IFC) President. Thank you for letting me share my thoughts and ideas. Our fraternity chapters should not be exempt from City rules. If a chapter violates the noise ordinance or creates a legitimate public safety issue, enforcement should absolutely follow. Interfraternity Council (IFC) fully supports enforcement when there are repeated incidents of noncompliance or situations where neighboring residents are genuinely impacted. Our concern is whether enforcement is being applied fairly, equally and consistently across the community. During Fall 2025 recruitment, Interfraternity Council (IFC) chapters on one side of East Foothill Boulevard received citations. At the same time, Panhellenic Association (PHA) chapters were having their recruitment activities in a nearby area but they did not receive similar citations. This created the appearance of unequal treatment between similar student organizations. Because of concerns like this, IFC believes enforcement related to gatherings should primarily be complaint driven unless there is a clear and immediate threat for public safety. IFC also believes enforcement standards should be applied consistently across all organizations and residences rather than through fraternity specific oversight structures. IFC also has concerns about how the City uses chapter apparel, flags, composites, recruitment materials, guest list systems, public recruitment dates, and social media as indicators for enforcement. IFC members were told visible Greek Life materials could be used to identify what the City considers an “illegal fraternity.” Because of this, IFC recommends that citations should not be based solely on symbols, apparel, recruitment activity, social media, or assumptions tied to organizational affiliation. Enforcement should instead focus on verified conduct and actual violations. IFC acknowledges that historically much of the City’s enforcement has been complaint driven and responsive to neighborhood concerns. However, many student organizations feel enforcement has increasingly shifted toward a more proactive and targeted strategy focused on monitoring fraternity related activity before any actual complaint, neighborhood disruption, or public safety concern occurs. One related concern we have has to do with the DoorList app which IFC uses as a guest-list management tool: a critical safety function for our events, ensuring only intended guests are allowed entry and that a verifiable log of attendees is in place for any post-event questions or needs. In late Winter Quarter 2025, a Code Enforcement Officer accessed the DoorList app in order to view fraternity guest lists and identify social events connected to specific addresses. Although the app’s guest list settings were not properly restricted and allowed individuals outside the Cal Poly environment to join, many students were uncomfortable with guest list information being used in this way for enforcement purposes. Administrative citations and land use violations were later issued, with some fines exceeding $2,600. IFC believes administrative event management tools and guest list systems should not themselves become the basis for enforcement action. Student organizations should be able to use risk management and guest management systems without concern that those tools are being monitored in ways that discourage lawful organizational activity. IFC also has concerns regarding delayed and escalating enforcement processes. In Winter 2025, Delta Chi reportedly received a noise citation approximately three minutes after quiet hours began during a situation involving only a small number of students playing basketball. That citation later became the basis for a CUP review process costing the organization more than $8,000 in legal fees. Because San Luis Obispo is a college town with a large student population surrounding California Polytechnic State University, IFC believes noise enforcement policies should realistically reflect the nature of student life while still protecting neighboring residents and addressing legitimate public safety concerns. IFC therefore recommends maintaining unrestricted activity standards from 7 AM to 10 PM on weekdays and until 12 AM on Fridays and Saturdays while continuing overnight property line enforcement standards from 10 PM to 7 AM on weekdays and 12 AM to 7 AM on Fridays and Saturdays. IFC also recommends encouraging officers to issue verbal warnings and provide a reasonable 15 to 30 minute correction window before issuing citations when there is no immediate safety threat. Organizations that proactively cooperate with officers and immediately correct issues should receive consideration before escalating penalties are imposed. IFC also recommends limiting enforcement to one citation for a single ongoing violation at a time. Fines should be capped and sequenced to give fraternities a reasonable opportunity to comply, before more penalties are imposed. In practice, this would mean: ● A backyard BBQ with music playing at a moderate level during the afternoon would not automatically risk a citation just because it is audible from the sidewalk or a nearby yard. ● A birthday party hosted by students with people talking, laughing, and music during early evening hours would not be treated as a violation unless it becomes genuinely disruptive or excessive. ● A fraternity hosting a philanthropy or recruitment-related social event during the day could operate without constant concern that routine activity will trigger enforcement based solely on audibility at the property line. ● Normal weekend activities like people coming and going, music at reasonable levels, and social interaction would be treated as normal and expected things in a college-town residential environment. Also, land use notices related to Fall 2025 recruitment were reportedly posted during winter break when most students were out on winter break, and nearly three months after the alleged incidents occurred, with multiple citations placed on single notices. IFC believes citations should be issued within a reasonable timeframe, such as 48 to 72 hours after the alleged violation, so organizations have a fair opportunity to respond and correct issues. IFC also believes the City should eliminate fraternity specific CUP requirements and the current fraternity definition within municipal code. IFC members were told that any organization meeting the City’s definition could theoretically be treated similarly to a fraternity, yet IFC has not seen this applied consistently in practice. This creates confusion for both Greek Life and other student organizations. No student organization should be presumed responsible for unrelated conduct simply because activity involves students near campus. Rather than maintaining a separate long term oversight structure tied specifically to fraternity identity, IFC believes the City should focus on consistent behavior based enforcement standards applied equally across the community, similar to cities like Santa Barbara where fraternities are referenced more generally within broader zoning definitions. From our review of different municipal code structures, San Luis Obispo seems to have a more ongoing fraternity specific CUP oversight system than some other California college communities, including Santa Barbara and Isla Vista near University of California, Santa Barbara. IFC believes SLO should continue moving toward a more behavior focused approach that still protects residents while recognizing the realities of a college town. Finally, IFC encourages the City to evaluate whether zoning and land use policies around California Polytechnic State University realistically reflect the presence of a large 18 to 22 year old student population. Approximately one third of San Luis Obispo residents are Cal Poly students, representing roughly 14,000 people living within the community. A college town functions differently from a traditional suburban neighborhood, and land use policy should recognize that reality while still protecting residents and addressing legitimate safety concerns. Student oriented areas should support a positive and realistic college environment within reasonable community standards. For example, California State University, Chico utilizes a fraternity and sorority housing overlay approach near campus that recognizes the unique realities of student living patterns and university adjacent housing. IFC recommends that the City explore similar planning tools, including the potential creation of a broader student overlay zone in appropriate areas near campus. A student overlay zone could establish tailored standards and expectations that better reflect the realities of a college community, while still addressing neighborhood compatibility, safety, noise, and accountability concerns. Looking at approaches like Chico’s could help San Luis Obispo better balance long term neighborhood interests with the realities of a large student population. Taken together, IFC’s recommendations are intended to promote fair, consistent, and behavior based enforcement standards across the community. These recommendations include prioritizing complaint driven enforcement, encouraging warnings and opportunities for corrective action before escalating penalties, limiting identity based enforcement practices, eliminating fraternity specific CUP oversight structures, and ensuring zoning and land use policies realistically reflect the realities of a college community while still protecting residents and addressing legitimate public safety concerns. At the end of the day, IFC is simply asking for fairness, consistency, and equal application of the rules. Enforcement should be based on conduct, not identity. Thank you, Neal Parthasarathy Cal Poly Interfraternity Council (IFC) President 62 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Tuesday, May 19, 2026 4:57 PM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi); Patino, Mallory Subject:FW: AEPI Agenda Attachments:Letter_Fraternity 05.17.2026.docx; Possible Outcomes for CUP's (3).pdf Importance:High Hi Timmi and Mallory, It just occurred to me that you might not have received this email and attachments. Apologies if that’s the case. Best, Whitney Whitney McDonald pronouns (she/hers) City Manager City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3934 E WMcDonal@slocity.org T 805.781.7114 C 805.550.8349 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Joshua Pinsky <aepi.presidentcalpoly@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 11:56 AM To: E-mail Council Website <emailcouncil@slocity.org> Subject: AEPI Agenda Decibel Readings.pdf Good Morning, My name is Joshua Pinsky, and I am the appellant for Item 6A. I am submitting three files in our favor. First is a proposed solutions doc constructed by my partner, Eliran Solomon, and I. The second attachment is the statement submitted to us from the resident managers of the apartment complex adjacent to our property. Third is our Decibel Readings which is applicable to our solutions. We are asking for these files to be attached to our item so that the Council is able to look at it before and during the hearing. Please let me know if you need anything else from me. 63 Best, Joshua -- Joshua Pinsky Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity President | ΣΩ Chapter Cal Poly San Luis Obispo | Business Administration May 17, 2026 To Whom It May Concern, My wife and I are the resident managers of Lee Arms Apartments, which is located directly next to the Alpha Epsilon Pi fraternity. We want to confirm that the members have not been a nuisance to us at any time. We have not experienced disturbances, issues, or concerns related to their activities or presence. Additionally, we have not received any complaints from our apartment tenants regarding the fraternity. Our interactions with the members have been respectful, and we have had no problems living adjacent to them. Sincerely, Andrew Chestnut Resident Manager, Lee Arms Apartments 258 California Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 ● revise the unrealistic 25-person cap ○ 1.5x occupancy was historically deemed as the multiple that held fraternities to a standard that would not cause harm to neighbors. ○ We surveyed neighbors, spoke directly to landlords, and residents to prove that this is not the case. It was submitted prior to the hearing that AEPI had held numerous events with over 25 members and the number count did not have a direct relationship with harm caused. ○ It is impossible to operate as a fraternity with over 90 members to operate out of a property that only 25 people are allowed to be in. ● create a more practical pathway for recurring low-impact events, ○ Special event permits have strict requirements that are very difficult to meet with the way fraternities and non-profits operate. Too much changes in 90 days in order to stick to events that are planned out prior to that deadline. ● structure re-review thresholds around academic semesters rather than rolling calendar periods ○ With the fraternities having turnover on an academic year, the re-review threshold should be in line with academic calendar and property turnover. ● and create clearer, more objective standards regarding noise enforcement and complaint evaluation. ○ Municipal code change for residential zones ○ We have used decibel readings in order to ensure noise is not going past what would be deemed conversational sound on our property lines. (see Exhibit 1) ○ For now allowing fraternities to be put on Christine Wallace’s party registration system, due to ordinance being subjective towards what PD deems “noise heard over the property line” ● Differentiate between who is actually calling; is it a direct neighbor who is being harmed, or is it someone going out and actually looking for noise who is not being harmed? ○ We should integrate this into a broader warning system, if no harm is being caused to a direct neighbor, the property holding a CUP should be given a warning and a 15-20 minute shut down time, if this complaint is given by a direct neighbor who is being harmed by noise, there should be a violation. Exhibit 1: Decibel Readings Doc 64 From:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Sent:Tuesday, May 19, 2026 8:37 AM To:Purrington, Teresa Cc:Mezzapesa, John; Collins, Scott Subject:Staff Report for 5/26 Attachments:Study Session - Code Enforcement Priorities, Safe and Livable Neighborhoods and Housing.docx Teresa, Please find attached the finished study session report for the council meeting next week. I am sorry that we couldn’t get this done in Escribe – so please let me know if there is anything we can do to help upload it into the system. Thank you! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Item 4a Department: [eSCRIBE Department] Cost Center: 4006 For Agenda of: 5/26/2025 Placement: Study Session Estimated Time: 180 Minutes FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director Prepared By: John Mezzapesa, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: CODE ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES – SAFE AND LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING RECOMMENDATION Receive a presentation on the City’s Code Enforcement program, take public testimony, and consider providing direction to staff regarding: 1. Concurrence on the existing Enforcement Priorities & Response Time Standards that are currently in place for code enforcement matters; 2. Adding a work plan item to the 2027-29 Financial Plan to explore and implement adjustments and simplifications to the Administrative Fine Structure for code enforcement violations; 3. Adding a work plan item to the 2027-29 Financial Plan to analyze and develop an alternative regulatory framework for Fraternity and Sorority Houses; 4. Continuing enforcement of Fraternity and Sorority land use violations consistent with the existing Enforcement Priorities & Response Time Standards, prioritizing violations that result in disturbance to others; 5. Undertaking an effort to analyze time-intensive code enforcement areas to identify and implement operational efficiencies to address the rising case load of the team; 6. Whether there are any neighborhood wellness, property maintenance, or nuisance standards the Council wishes to update in light of current operational challenges and evolving community needs; and 7. Whether there are any future, topic-specific study sessions needed to support more in depth policy development. REPORT-IN-BRIEF This report provides an overview of the current state of the City’s Code Enforcement Program, including the organizational structure, code enforcement process, workload and metrics, impactful legislation, and enforcement priorities. Holding this study session is a work plan item under the Major City Goal of “Housing and Neighborhood Livability – Healthy, Safe, and Affordable”. Item 4a The City’s Code Enforcement Program has experienced substantial growth in workload in recent years, driven by new legislation, increasing community expectations, and sharply rising complaint volume following implementation of AskSLO in 2022. In addition, several enforcement areas now require significant staff time and policy attention, and these areas are highlighted in this report. Fraternity and sorority enforcement has become one of the fastest growing and most resource-intensive categories, with 169 investigation requests and roughly 90 formal cases between 2024 and April 2026, often requiring multi-department coordination. Safe Housing enforcement is similarly complex and is a growing priority area for the department and community. In order to address the increasing workload for the division, staff has developed several recommendations that are meant to enhance code enforcement effectiveness by addressing regulatory frameworks and/processes that may not be working effectively and increase general efficiency of the program (see recommendations above). The report concludes with several key focus questions for Council. These questions include: 1. Staff Recommendations. Does the City Council concur with the staff recommendations outlined above related to a. Affirming the current Enforcement Priorities and Response Time Standards, b. Exploring a simplified Administrative Fine Structure, c. Adding a work program item to create a new regulatory structure for Fraternity and Sorority Houses, d. Continuing the enforcement of fraternity and sorority land use violations consistent with the Enforcement Priorities and Response Time Standards while prioritizing violations that result in disturbance to others, and e. Directing staff to undertake work to analyze time-intensive enforcement areas to identify potential process efficiencies? 2. Neighborhood Wellness & Property Maintenance Standards. Are there any neighborhood wellness, property maintenance, or nuisance standards the Council wishes to update in light of current operational challenges and evolving community needs? 3. Future Study Sessions. Would the Council like future, topic-specific study sessions to support more in-depth policy development? POLICY CONTEXT The Code Enforcement Division of the Community Development Department is charged with promoting health and safety in neighborhoods and increasing awareness and information about city policies and codes. Code enforcement staff investigates potential building and zoning code violations and works with property owners to gain compliance when a violation is identified. The Community Development Director is granted authority to make decisions and interpretations regarding health and safety violations and interpreting applications of the code in violations cited by Code Enforcement Officials Item 4a (SLOMC 1.24). This authority is often delegated to the Deputy Director/Chief Building Official to carry out such relevant duties. The California Health and Safety Code establishes both the legal authority and the mandatory responsibilities of local jurisdictions to protect the public from unsafe and substandard conditions. Under State Housing Law (Health & Safety Code §§17920.3, 17960, and 17980), cities and counties are required to designate a local enforcement agency and to investigate and enforce violations affecting health, safety, and habitability. The Code authorizes jurisdictions and their designated code enforcement officials to inspect properties, identify substandard or dangerous conditions, issue notices and orders to repair, rehabilitate, vacate, or demolish, and pursue administrative, civil, or criminal remedies when violations are not corrected. These provisions provide the statutory framework that enables local governments to address unsafe structures, public nuisances, and deteriorated housing conditions in order to protect occupants, neighboring properties, and the broader community. The Chief Building Official serves as the City’s designated “code official” and the “authority having jurisdiction” for purposes of interpreting and enforcing the City’s adopted building and safety codes (SLOMC §15.04.010). In this role, the Chief Building Official is responsible for making determinations regarding compliance with applicable construction, safety, and property maintenance standards, and for ensuring consistent application of state and local regulations intended to protect public health, safety, and welfare. Because many code enforcement cases involve violations of adopted building standards, the Code Enforcement Program operates in close coordination with, and under the technical authority of, the Chief Building Official. In addition, the Chief Building Official is granted the authority to exercise the powers authorized by California Penal Code §836.5(a), as adopted locally under SLOMC §1.16.060, which includes the authority to issue citations for violations of the Municipal Code. This authority provides the legal framework for administrative and enforcement actions related to building and safety violations identified through the code enforcement process. DISCUSSION Code Enforcement in San Luis Obispo Code Enforcement Team The current Code Enforcement Team is housed within the Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department, with the Code Enforcement Supervisor reporting directly to the Chief Building Official. The team consists of one Code Enforcement Supervisor, two Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) positions, one Code Enforcement Technician II (CET II), one Code Enforcement Technician I (CET I), and one Stormwater Code Enforcement Officer. Together, these positions provide the operational framework necessary to address a wide range of responsibilities, including neighborhood code compliance, zoning and land use enforcement, safe housing outreach, construction- related investigations, public education, and stormwater regulatory enforcement. Item 4a Code Enforcement Technician (CET) and Code Enforcement Officer (CEO) classifications both support the City’s overall code enforcement mission, but they serve different functional roles, levels of complexity, and programmatic focus. Based on City job classifications, CET positions are generally oriented toward neighborhood preservation, safe housing outreach, visible property maintenance issues, and frontline enforcement of more routine or readily identifiable violations. CET I staff primarily address neighborhood- based concerns such as property maintenance standards, front yard parking, sign regulations, nuisance abatement, and initial response to complaints, while also conducting field observations, issuing warnings or citations, maintaining records, and referring more complex zoning, construction, or land use violations to CEOs for further investigation. CET II positions expand on this role by administering the Safe Housing Education and Outreach Program, conducting residential inspections related to housing standards, connecting at-risk residents with housing resources, and taking on broader program coordination, outreach, and education responsibilities. In contrast, CEO positions are generally responsible for more complex, technical, and comprehensive enforcement functions involving municipal and state codes related to construction, zoning, land use, public health and safety, and building compliance. CEOs manage broader investigative caseloads, conduct inspections of residential, commercial, and industrial properties, oversee compliance with approved construction plans, prepare cases for prosecution or legal settlement, issue correction notices and stop work orders, and coordinate directly with the City Attorney and other departments on higher-level enforcement matters. CEO II positions further expand this responsibility through greater independence, more advanced case management, staff training, public presentations, Item 4a and leadership in community education efforts. In practical terms, CETs often serve as the City’s frontline staff for neighborhood quality, property maintenance, safe housing support, and proactive visible code issues, while CEOs typically handle more technical investigations, construction and zoning enforcement, and legally complex cases requiring deeper regulatory expertise. The diversity and frequency of investigation requests received by the Code Enforcement Team illustrate the breadth of responsibilities assigned to this staffing structure. The City processes a wide range of complaint types spanning traditional neighborhood preservation concerns, public nuisance issues, zoning and land use matters, housing and safety cases, construction-related violations, and specialized regulatory enforcement. While certain complaint categories such as abandoned shopping carts, substandard rental housing, unpermitted construction, overgrown vegetation, waste containers, and visible storage accounted for a substantial share of total requests during this period, the program also addressed dozens of less frequent but often more technically complex issues, including stormwater violations, unsafe occupancy, creek regulations, setback compliance, and public health concerns. This distribution demonstrates that code enforcement demand is not concentrated in a single service area but instead reflects a broad operational scope requiring staff with varied skill sets capable of addressing both high-volume neighborhood complaints and specialized investigations. The following chart summarizes the top 25 investigation request categories from 2023 through 2025. Item 4a Code Enforcement Top 25 Investigation Request Types (2023–2025) Overall, the current state of Code Enforcement reflects a program that has evolved into a comprehensive regulatory function addressing a wide range of public health, safety, and neighborhood quality issues. The combination of increasing investigation requests, expanded regulatory scope, and growing case complexity underscores the importance of aligning program structure and enforcement tools with the City’s current and future priorities. Code Enforcement Process and Enforcement Philosophy Traditional code enforcement activities form the foundation of the City’s program and are focused on maintaining safe, healthy, and well-maintained properties consistent with municipal and state requirements. Core functions include investigation and resolution of property maintenance violations, nuisance conditions, zoning and land use compliance, Item 4a unpermitted construction, and health and safety concerns affecting occupants and surrounding properties. These activities typically begin with receipt of a complaint, followed by inspection, documentation, and notification to responsible parties. Staff then work through a structured process intended to achieve voluntary compliance whenever feasible. The majority of code enforcement cases processed by the City begin as complaint-based investigations, meaning that a community member, tenant, property owner, business owner, or other reporting party contacts the City regarding a potential violation. Complaints may be received through email, telephone, in person, or the City’s centralized resident inquiry system, AskSLO, and are assigned based on violation type and Council-established priority levels (discussed later in this report). Cases may also originate through proactive field observations, business inspections, bar checks, research conducted during property inquiries, referrals from other City departments, or incidental observations made by staff while performing other duties. Once a request for investigation is received, staff review the complaint details, applicable code sections, property history, and any prior enforcement activity to determine the nature of the concern and assign an appropriate response. Code Enforcement Officers typically begin by conducting an initial site inspection, which may include exterior observation from publicly accessible areas, documentation of visible conditions, photographs, case notes, and coordination with other City departments when issues involve building, zoning, utilities, fire, or public works considerations. If violations are confirmed, responsible parties are generally contacted through notices, warning letters, phone calls, or in-person communication to explain the concern, applicable requirements, and corrective actions needed. When access to private property or interior spaces is necessary in order to determine the extent of suspected violations, and consent for inspection is not provided, staff may pursue additional legal or administrative mechanisms consistent with municipal authority, including inspection warrants or coordinated action with other authorized agencies when warranted. Throughout the process, officers track case progress, establish compliance deadlines, conduct follow-up inspections, and coordinate internally with supervisors, the City Attorney’s Office, Building and Safety, or outside agencies as needed depending on complexity and risk. Cases are typically closed once compliance is verified, while unresolved or escalating violations may move into formal enforcement pathways such as citations, abatement, or legal proceedings. This complaint-driven, compliance-first model is reflected in the City’s enforcement outcomes over time. Since 2015, approximately 87% of closed code enforcement cases were resolved before any citation was issued, demonstrating that the majority of cases achieve compliance through education, communication, corrective notices, and cooperative resolution rather than punitive enforcement. This indicates that administrative citations are typically reserved for situations involving continued noncompliance, repeat violations, or more serious cases where lower-level interventions have not been effective. The City’s enforcement philosophy emphasizes education, fairness, and proportional response while maintaining a clear commitment to protecting public health and safety. Item 4a Fines and Enforcement Tools As noted above, the City’s enforcement philosophy emphasizes achieving compliance through the lowest level of enforcement necessary. If voluntary compliance is achieved, cases may be resolved without escalation. When compliance is not achieved, the primary next step is typically issuance of a Notice of Violation (NOV), which formally identifies the violation, establishes a correction deadline, and outlines potential enforcement consequences if corrective action is not taken. Administrative citations are generally the City’s principal enforcement tool, but they are only one component of a broader escalation framework that may also include recordation of Notices of Violation on property, nuisance abatement proceedings, civil remedies, criminal citations, or, in severe health and safety situations, appointment of a receiver under Health and Safety Code §17980.7.The City’s administrative citation framework has developed incrementally over time as Council has adjusted enforcement tools in response to changing policy priorities and operational needs. The original administrative citation schedule adopted in 2002 established fines of $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second violation, and $500 for a third violation within a 12-month period, which remains the baseline schedule for most Municipal Code violations. In 2012, Resolution No. 10347 reduced fine amounts for Chapter 17.76 Neighborhood Services property maintenance violations1 to $50, $100, and $200 respectively, reflecting Council’s determination that many lower-level neighborhood livability violations do not pose immediate public health or safety threats. In 2018, Council established a higher fine tier for violations under Titles 8 (Health and Safety), 15 (Buildings and Construction), and 17 (Zoning Regulations, excluding Chapter 17.76, which is property maintenance standards), increasing fines to $100, $500, and $1,000 for first, second, and third/subsequent violations respectively. Noise violations were separately increased to $350, $700, and $1,000. Citation Amounts for Various Violation Categories Citation escalation generally follows a structured timeline tied to the severity of the violation and continued noncompliance. While the Municipal Code does not prescribe specific minimum timeframes between enforcement steps, the City has historically followed administrative practices intended to provide a reasonable opportunity for corrective action and to align with the administrative citation appeal process established 1 Neighborhood Services property maintenance violations include improper front yard paving, improper front yard parking, broken fencing, waste containers, abandoned buildings, deteriorated paint and finish material, deteriorated structures/equipment/machinery/pools, deteriorated parking areas, overgrown vegetation, graffiti, violation of conditions per a use permit/planned development/architectural review approval/variance or other land use entitlement, and maintenance of property in such condition as to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance. Item 4a by the Municipal Code. For relatively minor violations, such as yard maintenance, visible storage, or parking- related violations, the City typically allows approximately 10 days between issuance of a Notice of Violation (NOV) or Notice to Correct and the issuance of an administrative citation. For more complex violations, such as substandard housing, unpermitted construction, or land use violations, compliance periods are typically longer, often approximately 30 days, depending on the nature and extent of corrective work required. The City also generally allows a minimum of 10 days between administrative citations. This timeframe aligns with the appeal period established by the Municipal Code and helps ensure that a recipient has an opportunity to contest the initial citation before additional citations are issued. If a subsequent citation is issued before an appeal of the prior citation is resolved, and the earlier citation is later dismissed due to insufficient evidence or other procedural deficiencies, it may undermine the basis for subsequent citations tied to the same ongoing violation. Noise violations are handled differently from ongoing property maintenance or land use violations because they are typically event-based violations that occur at a specific point in time and generally do not involve an opportunity to cure before enforcement action is taken. Under Chapter 9.12 of the Municipal Code, violations may be enforced through immediate administrative citation or criminal enforcement when a violation is observed or documented. The Municipal Code further provides that each hour a qualifying noise violation continues may constitute a separate violation subject to additional penalties. In addition, once a noise violation has been verified, property owners may be subject to administrative action or citation for subsequent violations occurring within nine months of the prior violation, provided notice requirements established by the Municipal Code have been satisfied. Responsibility for fines and correction generally rests with the legally responsible party, though this can vary based on the violation type. For most property- based violations, including structural maintenance, zoning, property maintenance (such as waste container storage, landscaping maintenance and yard parking), and nuisance- related conditions, the property owner is ultimately legally responsible for correction and associated fines, even where the cause of the violation may be tenant behavior. In practice, staff often ensure both owners and occupants are notified, particularly for rental properties where violations such as refuse container screening, front yard parking, or nuisance activity may be occupant-controlled. Business or operational violations may also be directed to tenants, operators, or business owners depending on legal responsibility under the applicable code section. Property owners and responsible parties also retain due process rights. The City’s Municipal Code provides a multi-step appeal process for contesting Notices of Violation or administrative citations, beginning with Department Head review (Director’s Determination) and potentially progressing to a hearing officer, administrative review board, or Construction Board of Appeals depending on violation type. Judicial review may also be pursued beyond administrative remedies. Administrative citation appeals are not appealable to City Council. Item 4a If citations remain unpaid, the City may pursue collection through administrative, legal, or other means. Unpaid fines become delinquent after 30 days and accrue interest at 8% per month under SLOMC 1.24.070(C). Additional consequences may include permit or application suspension, referral to collections, and additional citations for continued violations. While unpaid fines alone do not always immediately trigger enforcement, repeated noncompliance can result in escalating citation cycles, daily fines in prolonged cases, and eventual transition into stronger nuisance abatement or legal enforcement tools. There are practical limitations on fine collection, including reduced use of liens and special assessments following legal developments, meaning that nuisance abatement, civil remedies, or direct corrective action may become more effective tools when fines accumulate but compliance remains unachieved2. For nuisance properties or chronic violators, administrative fines often become only one component of a broader enforcement strategy. Properties involving repeated violations, dangerous structures, persistent public nuisance, unsafe occupancy, or unresolved substandard housing may escalate into nuisance abatement proceedings, recorded Notices of Violation, abatement by the City with cost recovery, civil litigation, criminal proceedings, or court-appointed receivership. In these cases, the City’s enforcement objective may shift from voluntary compliance and progressive deterrence toward direct correction of dangerous or chronic conditions and long-term public protection. This process can take from several months to several years, depending on the complexity of the case and the willingness of the property owner to work with the City. Potential Fine Changes Authorized by Recent State Law Recent state legislation has expanded or clarified local authority to impose higher administrative penalties in certain contexts. However, these statutes generally establish maximum allowable penalty amounts; they do not automatically amend the City’s adopted administrative fine schedule. Under SLOMC Chapter 1.24, administrative fine amounts are established by City Council resolution, meaning any increase to currently adopted citation amounts would require future Council action through adoption of a resolution. AB 2598 (2018) and SB 60 (2021) amended Government Code Section 36900 and related provisions governing administrative fines and increased the maximum penalties cities may impose for certain categories of violations. Under this authority, for building and safety violations, cities may impose fines up to : • $130 for a first violation • $700 for a second violation • $1,300 for third and subsequent violations • $2,500 for subsequent violations within two years if the property is a commercial property that has an existing building at the time of the violation and the violation 2 Prior to 2016, some California jurisdictions utilized nuisance abatement liens and special assessments to recover unpaid administrative fines related to code enforcement matters. However, in Mechammil v. City of San Jacinto, the Ninth Circuit held that California law authorizes liens and special assessments for nuisance abatement costs, but not for the collection of administrative fines or penalties. As a result, local agencies generally may no longer rely on administrative liens or special assessments as a mechanism to collect unpaid code enforcement fines absent separate statutory authority. Item 4a is due to failure by the owner to remove visible refuse or failure to prohibit unauthorized use of the property SB 60 (2021) also authorizes higher penalties for violations involving short-term rental regulations up to: • $1,500 for a first violation • $3,000 for a second violation • $5,000 for third and subsequent violations For most other municipal code violations, statutory ceilings remain: • $100 for a first violation • $200 for a second violation • $500 for third and subsequent violations These higher short-term rental penalties apply only to violations that pose a threat to public health or safety, such as unsafe occupancy conditions, life-safety violations, or other circumstances where the operation of a short-term rental creates a significant risk to occupants or the surrounding community. Collectively, these legislative updates provide cities with greater discretion to adjust administrative fine schedules to better reflect enforcement costs, improve deterrence for repeat violations, and address emerging regulatory areas such as short-term rental compliance. Staff recommend exploring increasing fine amounts where allowed under these newer state laws and simplifying the fine structure to minimize confusion, if directed by Council as part of a future work plan item. This work could be integrated into the work program for the Community Development Department for the next Budget cycle (2027-29 Financial Plan). If directed to do so by Council, staff would undertake a comprehensive review of all administrative citation tiers rather than pursuing isolated adjustments. The objective would be to evaluate allowable statutory maximums, assess enforcement effectiveness, and determine whether simplification or consolidation of the current multi-tier structure would improve clarity and deterrence. Legislation Relevant to Code Enforcement Recent changes to California law continue to expand the responsibilities of local code enforcement agencies, particularly in the areas of housing safety, habitability enforcement, and structural safety of multifamily buildings. These legislative updates have increased inspection obligations, documentation requirements, and coordination with property owners, tenants, and other regulatory agencies. One of the recent mandates involves inspection of Exterior Elevated Elements (EEE) under Senate Bill 721, enacted in 2018, and Senate Bill 326, enacted in 2019. These laws require periodic inspection of balconies, decks, stairways, and walkways, and similar elevated structural elements in multifamily and common-interest developments to ensure structural safety. Both laws required initial inspections to be completed by January 1, 2025, by a licensed architect, civil engineer, or structural engineer. Inspections must be Item 4a performed proactively by property owners and homeowners associations (HOAs) and require the use of third-party qualified professionals to identify deterioration, water intrusion, or structural deficiencies that could pose a life-safety risk. When inspections identify an safety immediate hazard, local enforcement agencies may be required to respond, review reports, and verify that unsafe conditions are corrected or appropriately mitigated. To date, the City has received four instances in which inspection reports prepared by the engineer or architect of record identified immediate safety hazards and/or indicated that recommended repairs had not been completed as advised. These situations required staff review, coordination with property owners and design professionals, and follow-up enforcement to ensure that unsafe conditions were addressed. These requirements have increased coordination between building officials, property owners, engineers, architects, HOAs, and enforcement staff and have expanded the Division’s role in monitoring structural safety conditions beyond traditional nuisance and property maintenance enforcement. Assembly Bill 838, enacted in 2021, strengthened enforcement responsibilities related to substandard housing and tenant complaints. The law requires local agencies to conduct inspections when a tenant reports substandard living conditions or potential lead hazards, document violations, notify the property owner of required corrections, and schedule re- inspection to verify compliance. It also requires agencies to provide inspection documentation to affected tenants and limits the ability to charge inspection fees unless material violations are confirmed. In addition, AB 838 requires agencies to respond to qualifying complaints within timelines comparable to final inspection requests, which for the City generally results in next-business-day response obligations. The legislation also removed local discretion to require tenants to first attempt resolution with the landlord prior to initiating an inspection request. This legislation has increased workload associated with habitability complaints, rapid response obligations, documentation, tenant communication, and follow-up inspections in rental housing cases. Assembly Bill 548 (2023) expanded local enforcement agency responsibilities under State Housing Law by requiring jurisdictions to develop formal policies and procedures for broader multifamily housing inspections when substandard conditions or violations identified in one unit may affect others in the same building. Effective January 1, 2025, local agencies must evaluate adjacent and potentially impacted units, provide notice to property owners, issue corrective orders, and conduct reinspection to verify compliance. This legislation increases inspection scope, documentation requirements, and administrative workload, particularly in rental and multifamily housing cases where building-wide defects may exist. For example, in 2024 the City conducted comprehensive inspections at the Madonna Road Apartments after staff identified significant electrical hazards with the potential to affect multiple units and buildings within the complex. The inspection effort involved six Building and Safety staff members conducting inspections across 120 apartment units, 17 main electrical panels, five community laundry rooms, and Item 4a one office/community room. As a result of the inspections, staff identified approximately 350 unique code violations, including 168 damaged electrical receptacles, 20 improperly wired receptacles, 17 malfunctioning switches, seven damaged or improperly wired subpanels, five malfunctioning panel breakers determined to present imminent danger conditions, 10 improperly wired main electrical panels, and 123 subpanels contaminated by paint or texture overspray. The inspections also identified unpermitted plumbing and electrical work associated with the creation of an in-unit laundry room. These types of large-scale multifamily inspections require significant coordination between enforcement staff, building officials, tenants, property managers, contractors, and licensed design professionals, and illustrate the increased demands associated with expanded state housing inspection mandates. Senate Bill 1465 (2024) further expanded local code enforcement responsibilities under California’s State Housing Law by broadening the definition and enforcement scope of substandard buildings, strengthening tenant protections, and increasing procedural obligations for local agencies. The bill clarifies that substandard building standards apply regardless of zoning designation or approved use (i.e., applies also to commercial buildings) and expands enforcement authority to address conditions that endanger not only occupants, but also nearby residents and the public. SB 1465 also explicitly incorporates municipal code violations into State Housing Law enforcement proceedings, reinforces requirements for timely abatement actions, and increases obligations to provide notices and documentation to affected tenants. In addition, the bill strengthens legal remedies available when owners fail to correct violations, including expanded receivership authority, cost recovery mechanisms, relocation assistance requirements, and continued court oversight to ensure compliance. Collectively, these changes increase the administrative, legal, and inspection burden on local enforcement agencies by requiring more comprehensive case management, broader habitability oversight, and enhanced follow-through on complex substandard property cases, particularly where unsafe occupancy, chronic violations, or tenant displacement are involved. The changes also reflect a statewide shift toward stronger housing safety enforcement, increased protection for tenants, and proactive identification of structural hazards. These additional statutory responsibilities do not necessarily create more cases for the Code Enforcement team, but have been incorporated into current operations.. City Established Code Enforcement Priorities and Goal Response Times The Code Enforcement Division operates within a policy framework in which available staffing resources must be aligned with community priorities, life-safety obligations, and regulatory mandates. State mandates, such as housing habitability enforcement, substandard housing response, and structural safety requirements, are non-discretionary and consume baseline staff capacity before local discretionary priorities can be addressed. Once these mandated issues are addressed, staff then prioritizes response to requests based on the Council adopted priority levels. As workload has expanded and diversified, establishing clear priorities has become increasingly important to ensure staff time is directed toward the most critical issues. Item 4a Expected response times establish how quickly staff are expected to respond to reported violations, and these response times are currently set by Council policy (see table below). For purposes of Code Enforcement performance tracking, a case is generally considered “responded to” once staff complete the initial required action based on the nature of the complaint. For violations that are readily visible from the public right-of-way or that do not require access to private property, a response is considered complete once an officer conducts an inspection of the site. For complaints that require access to a residence, interior space, or otherwise inaccessible private property areas, a response is considered complete when staff make a reasonable attempt to contact the resident, property owner, or tenant to investigate the complaint. This distinction is important because response time measures initial action taken, rather than full case resolution or correction of the violation. Maintaining City established response standards requires staff to consistently prioritize new incoming complaints, which can reduce flexibility to address longer-term investigations, proactive enforcement initiatives, and follow-up on unresolved cases. As investigation volume has increased in recent years, strict response timelines have increasingly directed staff resources toward reactive work, reducing capacity for preventative or strategic code compliance efforts. The following table identifies the currently adopted priority classifications for specific complaint types and their associated target response timeframes. This was most recently reviewed and adopted by Council in 2017 (Council Agenda Report, Council Action). At this time, staff does not recommend making changes to the priority classification and response timeframes, as they help staff prioritize complaints and they provide clarity to the public and staff regarding the program’s priorities. As new issues emerge that are not clearly defined in the priority list, staff uses judgement to categorize them in the most appropriate tier based on potential neighborhood impacts or impacts to health and safety. It should be noted that “land use” violations are not specifically called out in the response times framework, as they cover a wide variety of potential violations. Again, when requests for inspection for these types of violations are received, they are prioritized based on potential impacts. Item 4a Current Goal Response Timeframe and Priority Ranking for Code Enforcement Cases Timeframe for Response Activities/Situations Covered Priority 1: Immediate Response • Dangerous Buildings • Dangerous Utilities or Materials • Examples include car accidents that damage a building, structure fires or assessment after an earthquake, unpermitted construction that poses an immediate public safety risk to occupants or surrounding properties. Priority 2: 24 Hour Response • Active construction without a permit • Substandard housing- no water, heat, unsafe use • Illegal/Unsafe sewage/electrical/ gas/discharge/dumping • Unsecured buildings- accessible to unauthorized persons • Public Nuisance*- e.g. refrigerator with doors on left outside • Unsafe Occupancy Priority 3: 48 Hour Response • Illegal/Unpermitted construction (completed) • Garage conversion/non-habitable space used for occupancy/commercial use in residential space/zone • Grading without a permit • Interior infestation of vermin • Unsafe Occupancy- i.e. living in commercial building Priority 4: 72 Hour Response • Noise and odor violations • Business License/TOT/Vacation Rentals • Polystyrene/ Straws/Water bottles • Signs • Animals & waste • Fence heights & locations • Exterior infestation of vermin * “Public nuisance” is a broad enforcement category that may include a wide range of conditions affecting public health, safety, or neighborhood livability. Some nuisance conditions, such as unsecured structures, exposed utilities, unsafe occupancy, illegal sewage discharge, or appliances and equipment that create an attractive nuisance hazard (such as abandoned refrigerators with doors attached), present immediate life-safety concerns and are therefore assigned higher response priorities. Other nuisance conditions, such as ongoing noise, odor, property maintenance, or unpermitted construction cases, may require longer-term investigation and compliance efforts and are prioritized based on the severity of the condition, immediacy of the risk, and potential impacts to occupants or the surrounding community. It should be noted that, even with increased workload, staff always prioritizes immediate health and safety related items first. For example, staff will always make every effort to address immediately response priority level items immediately, even on weekends or during evenings, etc. Other items that are health and safety related will be prioritized over those that are not. As workloads increase, the items that tend to be deprioritized are those that are not immediate health and safety items. Item 4a Metrics and Current Workload The Code Enforcement Division monitors workload using several key performance indicators (KPI), including Requests for Investigation (complaints received), cases opened, cases resolved, and response time performance. Together, these measures provide insight into service demand, operational trends, and the overall balance between incoming workload and available staffing resources. Of these metrics, the primary KPI regularly reported to Council is response time performance, which is included in the Department’s Performance and Workload Measures as part of the annual budget review process. Council has established an operational goal that 85% of complaints be responded to within the adopted Expected Response Times framework. This KPI serves as the Division’s primary externally reported performance benchmark and reflects how effectively staff are meeting Council-adopted service expectations. While response time compliance is the principal Council-facing KPI, additional internal KPIs including total complaints received, cases opened, and cases resolved are used administratively to evaluate operational workload, staffing demand, and officer productivity. These internal measures are important because they provide context for response time performance by illustrating fluctuations in complaint volume, case complexity, and investigative burden that may contribute to response time shortfalls. For example, increases in complaints received or more resource-intensive investigations may reduce the Division’s ability to maintain the 85% on-time response target, even where staff productivity remains high. Requests for Investigation Requests for Investigation represent the primary driver of workload and reflect community demand for service. Using calendar-year totals, investigation requests increased from approximately 566 in 2017 to 1,259 in 2025, representing roughly 122 percent growth. After remaining relatively stable through 2019 and temporarily disrupted during the pandemic period, request volume began increasing sharply in 2022 and has remained elevated through 2023–2025. Through May 15 of 2026, the City has received 547 requests for investigation so far. A detailed review of requests from September 2022 through the present confirms this sustained increase in demand. Requests rose significantly in 2024 compared to 2023 and remained at similarly elevated levels in 2025, indicating that increased workload reflects a structural shift rather than a temporary spike. This sustained growth corresponds with expanded community use of the AskSLO reporting system in 2022, broader regulatory responsibilities, and continued reliance on complaint-driven enforcement. Review of requestor data from 2023 through 2025 indicates that the City received approximately 3,613 total investigation requests from approximately 666 unique complainants during that period. An additional 795 requests were submitted anonymously. This data reflects broad community utilization of the reporting system while also demonstrating that some individuals submit multiple requests over time related to ongoing neighborhood, housing, or property maintenance concerns. The following chart illustrates the investigation requests, without Covid-specific related requests, in order to Item 4a illustrate the changes over time. Recent request data and case review show that Code Enforcement activity is largely driven by property maintenance and neighborhood condition issues3, which account for roughly 40 percent of total workload. Common requests include abandoned shopping carts, housing and habitability concerns, unpermitted construction, vegetation and right- of-way maintenance, refuse issues, and exterior property conditions. The remaining 60 percent of cases cover a broad range of general compliance issues such as accessory structures, minor building violations, illegal occupancy, signage, and abandoned vehicles, many of which are resolved quickly, though some require ongoing monitoring. For requests received between 2023 and 2025, most fall within Priority 4 (72-hour response), accounting for 3,220 requests, or approximately 74 percent of all request topics. Priority 2 and Priority 3 requests accounted for 801 and 301 requests respectively, while Priority 1 immediate-response requests represented a comparatively small share with 15 requests. 3 “Property maintenance and neighborhood condition issues” generally refer to quality-of-life or aesthetic conditions that may affect neighborhood appearance, livability, or compatibility, but do not typically present an immediate threat to public health or safety. Examples may include overgrown vegetation, refuse container storage, front or side yard parking, exterior storage, abandoned shopping carts, minor signage violations, fence maintenance, landscaping maintenance, and similar property upkeep concerns. Item 4a Priority Level of Requests between 2023 and 2025 Priority Level Total Requests Percent of total Requests Priority 1 –Immediate Response 15 0.3% Priority 2 – 24 Hour Response 801 18.5% Priority 3 – 48 Hour Response 301 6.9% Priority 4 – 72 Hour Response 3,220 74.2% Response Times Response performance provides important insight into operational capacity, workload pressure, and the Code Enforcement Division’s ability to meet Council-established response expectations. Fiscal year analysis based on the actual and expected response dates as defined per the priority levels previously discussed (July 1–June 30) shows that on-time response performance was generally strongest during earlier years of the program, with rates commonly ranging from approximately 72 to 81 percent between FY 2014–2015 and FY 2020–2021. Beginning in FY 2021–2022, available historical reporting indicates that approximately 79.8 percent of requests were appropriately responded to on or before the expected due date across roughly 430 investigation requests. However, due to a transition in citizen request management systems and a partial data gap between approximately May 2022 and October 2022, detailed post-deadline closure metrics (such as completion within 1, 3, or 14 days past due) are not fully available for FY 2021–2022 and portions of FY 2022–2023. For FY 2022–2023, based on departmental summary figures rather than the incomplete case-level dataset, approximately 75.9 percent of 952 requests were appropriately responded to on time. This represents a moderate decline from FY 2021–2022 but remains substantially stronger than subsequent years. On-time response performance then declined significantly as requests for investigation increased, falling to approximately 60.2 percent in FY 2023–2024 and 59.8 percent in FY 2024–2025. For FY 2025–2026 (partial year through April 2026), current reporting indicates modest improvement to approximately 63.3 percent. Differences between total requests filed, total requests responded to, and year-to-date response calculations in the current partial year likely reflect cases that remain open, were initiated late in the reporting window, or have not yet reached final disposition. This decline in on-time performance corresponds closely with substantial growth in annual requests for investigation. It is also important to note that response time expectations are measured in calendar days rather than working days, while current staffing does not include routine weekend coverage. As a result, requests received later in the workweek—particularly on Thursdays or Fridays—may not receive an initial response until the following Monday. This timing dynamic can artificially extend measured response times by two to three days, even when staff are responding at the earliest practical opportunity during normal business operations. Accordingly, a portion of responses categorized as “past due” may reflect scheduling limitations rather than delayed action, and this factor should be considered when evaluating overall performance trends. Item 4a Although a smaller percentage of requests are completed strictly by the assigned due date, most are still resolved relatively soon thereafter. In FY 2023–2024, approximately 78 percent of requests were responded to appropriately within one day past due, 90 percent within three days, and 98 percent within 14 days. In FY 2024–2025, approximately 77 percent were responded to appropriately within one day, 89 percent within three days, and 97 percent within 14 days. In FY 2025–2026 (partial year), approximately 82 percent have been responded to appropriately within one day, 92 percent within three days, and 99 percent within 14 days. These figures indicate that while increasing workload has affected the Division’s ability to consistently meet formal due dates, the overwhelming majority of requests continue to be responded to within a relatively short period. Delays may reflect field verification, investigative complexity, coordination with property owners or tenants, time allowed for voluntary compliance, and staff workload distribution. Response Times for Requests Between 2021 and 2026 Fiscal Year Total Requests Responded on or Before Due Within 1 Day Past Due Within 3 Days Past Due Within 14 Days Past Due FY 2021–2022* 430 79.80% — — — FY 2022–2023* 952 75.90% — — — FY 2023–2024 1,130 60.20% 78% 90% 98% FY 2024–2025 1,421 59.80% 77% 89% 97% FY 2025–2026 (partial) 1,111 63.30% 82% 92% 99% *FY 2021–2022 and FY 2022–2023 include known reporting limitations due to system transition and incomplete case-level continuity. Because of system transitions and reporting limitations, FY 2021–2022 and FY 2022– 2023 should be interpreted cautiously when making direct comparisons to later years. Case Duration For purposes of this analysis, case duration refers to the total amount of time between when a case is opened and when it is fully resolved and closed. Analysis of case duration timelines indicates that most code enforcement cases are fully resolved within a relatively short timeframe, while a smaller number of complex cases remain open for extended periods. Of approximately 7,371 closed code enforcement and safe housing cases between 2017 and 2025, about 64% were resolved within 30 days, nearly 78% were resolved within 60 days, and roughly 89% were resolved within six months. Median case duration was 19 days, demonstrating that most complaints are addressed quickly. However, a smaller share of cases, typically involving housing, structural, land use, repeat violations, or situations requiring legal escalation, remain open significantly longer, with approximately 6% lasting more than one year. These longer-duration cases often demand substantially more staff time, coordination, inspections, and follow-up, contributing disproportionately to overall workload despite representing a relatively small portion of total cases. Staff estimates that approximately 10 percent of the team’s time is allocated Item 4a to a handful of longer-duration cases at any given time. Some of the longest-duration cases have been open for several years due to legal issues and/or challenges with working with the property owner. This pattern reflects a program that generally resolves routine complaints efficiently while also managing a smaller but resource-intensive portfolio of prolonged enforcement actions. Case Duration Between 2017 and 2025 Time Case is Open Number of Cases % of Closed Cases Closed within 1 month (≤30 days) 4,750 64.40% 1–2 months (31–60 days) 989 13.40% 2–6 months (61–180 days) 834 11.30% 6–12 months (181–365 days) 350 4.70% 1–2 years (366–730 days) 259 3.50% Over 2 years (>730 days) 189 2.60% Emerging Themes and New Challenges in Code Enforcement Over the past several years, new themes have emerged in Code Enforcement, and priorities have begun to shift based on input from the community and changes in regulations. The most impactful of these are noted in this section. Fraternity and Sorority House Enforcement Overview of Enforcement Enforcement of Fraternity and Sorority house land use regulations has become one of the fastest growing areas of code enforcement in the past three years, due in large part to a dramatic increase in the number of requests for investigation received by the Department. Fraternity and Sorority Houses are required to have Conditional Use Permits granted by the City of San Luis Obispo and can only be located in R-3 and R-4 zones (SLOMC 17.10.020/17.86.130). Houses that are used as Fraternity or Sorority houses that are operating without a Conditional Use Permit are violating the municipal code and subject to enforcement. In addition, fraternity and sorority houses that are operating with Conditional Use Permits but violating the conditions of these permits are subject to re- review of the permit and potential revocation, pursuant to the terms of the use permits. Review of investigation and enforcement activity since March of 2024 indicates that more than 100 unique properties or reported locations have been associated with suspected fraternity or sorority land use or use permit violations, reflecting the broad scope of this enforcement issue citywide. Code Enforcement responds to complaints and proactively identified violations related to fraternity and sorority houses using the same standardized investigation and enforcement Item 4a process used for other types of violations. Complaints may be received through the City’s request system, hotline, email, in-person reporting, or referral from the Police Department. Upon receipt, staff document all relevant details, including complainant information, descriptions, photographs, and any supporting evidence. An initial assessment is conducted to determine whether sufficient information exists to proceed, followed by a formal investigation to verify that a violation has occurred. This includes confirming that an event took place, determining whether it was sponsored by a fraternity or sorority, and verifying that members of the organization reside at the subject property. If evidence is insufficient, the request is closed. If a violation is confirmed, a formal code enforcement case is opened and a Notice of Violation (NOV) is issued to the property owner, with copies provided to occupants, affiliated organizations, and university representatives. Cases remain open for monitoring, and repeat violations within a 12- month period result in escalation to administrative citations and potential further enforcement action. Coordination with the Police Department has become a key component of enforcement efforts related to fraternity and sorority houses. Code Enforcement staff receive a weekly report identifying all noise citations and warnings issued by the Police Department during the prior week. These reports are systematically reviewed to identify locations that may be associated with fraternity or sorority activity. If a listed location has been previously identified, suspected to be affiliated with a fraternity or sorority, or is known to have an approved Conditional Use Permit, staff initiate follow-up investigation. This includes reviewing available police reports, conducting additional research, and evaluating whether the noise violation may have resulted from a fraternity- or sorority-sponsored event. Staff routinely review social media and other publicly available information to determine whether events were advertised or promoted by a fraternity or sorority, and conduct site visits to interview residents regarding the nature of the gathering associated with the noise citation. This process allows staff to convert otherwise isolated noise violations into documented land use violations when appropriate, strengthening enforcement cases and improving overall compliance monitoring. Beginning in 2026, this coordination effort was expanded through the implementation of a formal weekly notification process to the University’s Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities. Following review of the Police Department’s weekly noise citation and warning reports, Code Enforcement prepares and transmits a structured summary identifying properties that meet defined criteria, including locations previously identified as fraternity or sorority residences or properties operating under an approved Conditional Use Permit that received a noise citation or warning during the prior week. These notifications provide additional context regarding municipal code requirements and potential violations, including the relationship between noise violations and Conditional Use Permit compliance, and are intended to support University review of potential violations of student organization policies and event registration requirements. This ongoing information-sharing process enhances coordination between the City and University, improves accountability, and supports more comprehensive enforcement of both municipal regulations and applicable university conduct standards. Item 4a Enforcement involving fraternity and sorority properties often requires coordination across multiple departments, including between CDD and the Police Department which respond to noise complaints and may involve repeat violations, structural safety concerns, or high- occupancy conditions. These enforcement actions represent one of the most complex and resource-intensive components of the Code Enforcement program in the last few years. This work includes enforcement of conditional use permit requirements for permitted fraternity and sorority houses, investigation of land use violations associated with unpermitted fraternities and sororities, and enforcement related to meetings, gatherings, and events conducted at these properties. Unlike typical nuisance or property maintenance violations, fraternity and sorority enforcement frequently involves repeat violations, multiple enforcement actions at a single property, events that occur after hours and on weekends when Code Enforcement staff are not typically scheduled to work, and escalation to administrative citations or Planning Commission review. Review of investigation and enforcement records indicates that staff have responded to 176 investigation requests associated with fraternity and sorority land use and use permit violations between 2015 and April 2026, resulting in approximately 90 formal code enforcement cases across 66 unique properties. Prior to 2024, requests related to fraternity and sorority land use violations were relatively infrequent, with only eight identified investigation requests between 2015 and 2023 combined. All received requests since 2023 were submitted by a total of eight unique complainants, including one anonymous complaint. Investigation requests increased significantly beginning in 2024, with 37 requests received in 2024, 63 in 2025, and 68 additional requests received in just the first four months of 2026, illustrating rapidly increasing demand, concentrated enforcement periods, and expanding workload. These investigation requests include both requests to investigate suspected unpermitted fraternity and sorority houses based on events that resulted in noise violations or police calls, as well as requests related to publicly advertised events that did not ultimately result in a noise violation. Formal code enforcement cases similarly increased from 23 in 2024 to 59 in 2025, with cases continuing into 2026. Together, these figures demonstrate that fraternity enforcement has evolved from an occasional land use issue into a major operational category requiring sustained investigative, administrative, and enforcement resources. Enforcement actions have included numerous advisory notices, repeated Notices of Violation, escalating administrative citations, and several cases advancing to Planning Commission review resulting in modification or revocation of use permits. During this time, two Conditional Use Permits were voided due to inactivity and an additional three use permits were revoked by the Planning Commission. In addition to reactive complaint-based enforcement, the Division has undertaken proactive enforcement efforts, particularly during 2025, to identify violations that may not have been formally reported. These efforts included systematic monitoring of social media platforms for advertised fraternity and sorority events, cross-referencing event dates and Item 4a times with known or suspected locations, and conducting coordinated inspection campaigns following identified events. Staff also engaged directly with fraternity and sorority organizations through outreach and education, including attending campus events to communicate City regulations and request voluntary compliance. Through these proactive efforts, staff documented dozens of events across multiple locations, many of which had not been reported through traditional complaint channels, significantly expanding the scope of enforcement activity. These proactive investigations required a substantial investment of staff time. As an example, over a concentrated three-week enforcement period in 2025, staff dedicated more than 100 hours to research, monitoring, field inspections, evidence collection, and follow-up investigation activities. This level of effort was necessary to establish verifiable evidence of violations, particularly in cases where events occurred outside normal working hours or where responsible parties were unwilling to confirm activity. This time commitment is significantly higher than that required for typical nuisance or property maintenance cases and illustrates the resource-intensive nature of this enforcement category. Financial penalties issued through these enforcement actions are significant and increasing. Review of City citation records from January 1, 2024, through May 2, 2026, indicates that fraternity/sorority-related code cases resulted in 34 administrative citations across 26 separate code cases, totaling approximately $24,100 in assessed fines. Citation activity increased sharply from just one citation totaling $100 in 2024 to 23 citations totaling approximately $8,500 in 2025, with 10 additional citations totaling approximately $15,500 already issued during the first four months of 2026 alone. This trend reflects both intensified enforcement activity and increasing use of higher-tier penalties for repeat or ongoing violations. Several repeat-violation fraternity properties accumulated more than $2,500 in fines each, demonstrating that a relatively small number of chronic violators can require disproportionate staff resources, repeated enforcement cycles, and escalating penalties. In total, enforcement actions during this period have included dozens of Notices of Violation issued to property owners and responsible parties, 34 administrative citations resulting in monetary penalties, and multiple cases escalated to the Planning Commission for consideration of Conditional Use Permit modification or revocation. These outcomes reflect a graduated enforcement approach that begins with voluntary compliance and escalates to financial penalties and land use entitlement actions when violations persist. It should be noted that the City is also taking steps to educate students about regulations pertaining to Fraternity and Sorority housing including attending meetings of fraternity and sorority leadership groups to provide information, and meeting with individual organizations to discuss rules and procedures. The City is also working with Cal Poly administration to discuss this complex issue and explore potential actions that can be taken to ensure better compliance with regulations. These actions include looking into how events could be moved onto campus, whether there are alternative venues in town for Fraternity and Sorority events, and assessing how the University and City educate students on regulations. Item 4a Interestingly, data that was recently analyzed appears to show that noise complaints decreased fairly significantly during the same time that a large number of beds opened to students on campus. This could indicate that housing more students on campus addresses some of the neighborhood compatibility and noise issues, and the City and Cal Poly will continue to analyze this data. The following figure, created using noise data from the Police Department and student housing data from Cal Poly, illustrates that the City experienced a fairly significant decrease in Noise Party4 complaints (blue line) from 2,896 in 2007 to 1,729 in 2013. Around the same time, a significant number of beds (yellow line) opened on Cal Poly campus. In 2006, 3,600 students lived on campus (about 20 percent of enrolled students) and 2013, 7,241 students lived on campus (about 37 percent of enrolled students). It appears that the small dip in Noise Party complaints that occurred immediately prior to 2020 could be at least partially related to the opening of the yakʔitʸutʸu dorm in academic year 2018-19, which houses more than 1,400 students. The drop in students living on campus in 2020 is an anomaly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 4 Noise Party complaints are specific to noises such as loud music and loud voices, and are distinct from other noise issues like barking dogs or loud construction noise, which are classified differently by the Police Department. Item 4a Challenges with Fraternity and Sorority House Enforcement and Impact on Code Enforcement Program There are several aspects of Fraternity and Sorority House zoning enforcement that are unique and make enforcement particularly time consuming and challenging. First, enforcement frequently occurs in concentrated periods tied to academic and event cycles (such as Rush week). For example, during January and February 2025, numerous investigation requests and enforcement actions were generated within short timeframes related to reported unpermitted events. Similarly, during late September and early October enforcement periods, staff documented violations across a large number of properties associated with fraternity activity. This episodic pattern means enforcement demand is not evenly distributed throughout the year but instead occurs in sudden spikes that require rapid intake, land use analysis, field investigation, evidence documentation, interdepartmental coordination, and enforcement follow-up over compressed timeframes. In addition, the time commitment associated with fraternity enforcement is significantly higher than for typical nuisance or maintenance cases. Individual properties may require repeated inspections, tracking of violations across multiple dates, coordination with Police Department and City Attorney’s Office, and preparation of administrative enforcement documentation. Repeat violations and escalation procedures further increase staff time, particularly when cases advance to administrative hearings or Planning Commission review. The scale of this work -169 investigation requests, approximately 90 code cases, and 34 citations totaling more than $24,000 in roughly two years—demonstrates that fraternity enforcement now represents a major specialized workload category within the Code Enforcement Division. In addition, violations are frequently event-based and recurring. It can require significant staff time to confirm event-based violations (such as hosting a Fraternity sponsored event), especially since Code Enforcement staff do not generally work during the hours that the events are occurring (evening hours/weekends), so they cannot be confirmed at the time of the event. This requires Code Enforcement staff to investigate and assemble information from a variety of sources to confirm a violation, as code enforcement is not determining whether a noise violation occurred (that is determined by the Police Department at the time of the event) but is using information to determine if a land use violation has occurred. The recurring nature of these events also requires ongoing monitoring rather than one-time correction. Determining whether a property meets the municipal definition of a fraternity (see SLOMC 17.156.014) can require detailed investigation and documentation, and student behavior changes, which requires constant change in investigatory tools or processes. At this time, staff does not have evidence that the extensive effort to address Fraternity and Sorority land use violations has resulted in measurable change in the number of unpermitted houses and/or Fraternity and Sorority events occurring in unpermitted houses. As potential land use violations without an immediate health and safety impact, unpermitted Fraternity or Sorority houses currently fall under Priority 4 of the Enforcement Priorities & Response Time Standards, and the same is true of noise violations occurring at either permitted or un-permitted houses. Given the level of staff effort seen since 2024 Item 4a and the episodic but intensive nature of this work, it is recommended that Code Enforcement staff continue to investigate and respond to complaints associated with these activities consistent with existing Enforcement Priorities & Response Time standards while focusing first on violations that result in disturbance to others (such as instances where a noise citation has been issued by the Police Department). Overlay Zones and Other Regulatory Tools for Fraternity and Sorority Houses In response to ongoing concerns regarding neighborhood livability, code compliance, and the concentration of Fraternity and Sorority houses in specific areas of the City, the idea of an overlay zone has been raised by various members of the community as a potential tool for regulation. This concept was also identified in the 2025 Grand Jury Report on Greek Housing as a potential strategy to better manage the localized impacts associated with these uses. This section of the staff report is meant to provide high-level information about this concept and to seek direction on a potential future work plan item related to changing Fraternity/Sorority regulations in the municipal code. An overlay zone is a zoning mechanism that applies additional or different standards or requirements to a defined geographic area, that is imposed on top of the underlying base zoning. Overlay zones are typically used to address unique or area-specific issues that are not effectively managed through citywide regulations (for example, issues that may arise near a college campus). In the context of Fraternity and Sorority housing, an overlay zone could be structured to address operational and neighborhood compatibility concerns. Potential regulatory approaches within an overlay zone could include: • Enhanced performance standards related to noise, outdoor gatherings, and property maintenance; • Tailored operational requirements (e.g., management plans, point-of-contact requirements, or event protocols); • Proactive or geographically focused code enforcement strategies; and • Administrative permitting requirements tied to ongoing compliance. It should be noted that the City’s ability to regulate college related neighborhood compatibility issues through zoning is significantly constrained by California state housing law. The City cannot adopt regulations that would: • Reduce allowable residential density below what is permitted by the base zoning; • Impose occupancy limits based on relationships among residents (i.e., regulate who may live together); • Impose occupancy limits beyond what the state law allows (i.e. regulate how many people can live together)5; • Establish minimum parking requirements beyond what is allowed under state law; 5 Current standards for occupancy limits are complex and regulated by the International Property Maintenance Code. In short, every bedroom occupied by more than one person shall contain not less than 50 square feet of floor area for each occupant. In addition, for efficiency units (no bedroom) a unit occupied by one person shall have at least 120 square feet, a unit occupied by two persons shall have at least 190 square feet, and a unit occupied by three persons shall have at least 260 square feet. Item 4a • Indirectly constrain housing supply; • Discriminate against a class of residents (e.g., students) in a manner inconsistent with fair housing requirements. The City’s current process incorporates many of the possible regulatory tools of an overlay zone mentioned above, as Fraternity and Sorority houses are only allowed in designated areas (R-3 and R-4 zones) and are required to adhere to certain standards and obtain a regulatory permit. As described above, if there was interest in moving toward a different regulatory scheme for Fraternity and Sorority houses, it would take time to carefully craft new regulations considering the goals of the overlay zone as well as the legal limitations that exist, and staff recommends adding this as a work plan item for the next financial plan. Comparative Case Studies Staff reviewed several jurisdictions that have implemented geographically targeted strategies to address Greek or student housing impacts. These examples illustrate a range of approaches. • Chico, CA – The City of Chico has established a Fraternity and Sorority Overlay Zone (FS) that limits where recognized Greek organizations may locate and is primarily in the South Campus Area adjacent to California State University, Chico. Greek houses are permitted in this area, but are also subject to a separate permit process administered by the City (A Fraternity and Sorority House Permit). The Permit required is granted for a period of one year and requirements that the names and contact information for officers of the fraternity/sorority are submitted to the City as well as written authorization from the property owner granting permission to operate a fraternity/sorority at the location. This permit does not appear to be discretionary. This is similar to the current regulatory system in San Luis Obispo, where Greek Houses are allowed in certain zones (although the City does not use an overlay zone, they are only allowed in R-3 and R-4 zones) and subject to an additional permit process; however, the City of San Luis Obispo CUP process is more onerous, more expensive, and includes more conditions regulating operation of Greek houses. The CUP also runs with the land, meaning it does not expire after a period of time, unless the use is discontinued for at least a year. • Davis, CA – The City of Davis utilizes a “Residential Restricted” (R-R) zoning district intended to preserve neighborhood character in areas with high student populations. The district includes limitations on certain high-intensity residential uses, for example, by requiring that single-family homes have five or fewer bedrooms to be allowed without a conditional use permit. The zoning district does not specifically address Greek housing, however, a conditional use permit can be granted for a “living groups or other organized groups of university students, faculty members or employees, who have elected officers, who are self-governed and who do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion or national origin”. Item 4a • Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara has adopted a proactive, partnership-driven, geographically focused enforcement model to support neighborhood wellness around Santa Clara University (Santa Clara University Area Enforcement). In this defined area, the tools used in this model include proactive code enforcement that include coordinated efforts between the City, the university, and the police department, with an emphasis on early intervention and ongoing compliance of municipal code standards. The program also includes an “annual walkabout” with university staff and students, police and code enforcement. Groups of these individuals walk door-to-door to discuss being good neighbors. This program does not specifically address Fraternity or Sorority houses, but is a geographically based program addressing university related neighborhood wellness concerns. Based on this cursory review, overlay zones are relatively uncommon as a standalone regulatory tool and appear to be most commonly paired with permitting and enforcement mechanisms such as required discretionary permits for Greek or group houses. City staff is recommending that a work plan item for the Community Development Department and any future work on studying or changing the municipal code regulations pertaining to Fraternity and Sorority Houses would need to be carefully undertaken with special attention paid to enforceability of regulations. Short-Term Rental Enforcement Short-term rental enforcement focuses on identifying unpermitted operations, ensuring compliance with homestay regulations, and maintaining fairness in housing and tax compliance. These cases often involve investigative work, documentation, follow-up monitoring, and coordination with licensing and planning functions. Enforcement can be challenging because online rental platforms do not list addresses of rentals, and obscure specific location related data, which can make it difficult to identify where short-term rentals are operating. As of the writing of this report, staff is not proactively monitoring short-term rental violations, but instead responds on a complaint basis, consistent with other code enforcement matters. When a member of the public submits information regarding a suspected short-term rental, the complaint is investigated, and if warranted, a case is opened. Review of investigation request data indicates that the City has received approximately 36 short-term rental or homestay-related investigation requests between 2023 and May 2026, including 7 in 2023, 20 in 2024, 7 in 2025, and 2 additional requests through May 2026. City staff does currently have a subscription for specialized software, Rentalscape, that helps identify short-term rentals in the community. This software gathers data from a variety of sources to identify the probable addresses of short-term rentals (this is necessary as most short-term rental listings do not contain the address). The software can also facilitate proactive large-scale enforcement of suspected rentals through automated mailings to property owners that appear to be operating short term rentals without proper permits. Staff has not fully utilized the proactive capabilities of the software Item 4a given the current staff capacity and focus on neighborhood wellness, safe housing, and fraternity and sorority compliance. In addition, Senate Bill 346 (Short-Term Rental Facilitator Act of 2025), enacted in October 2025, authorizes local agencies to adopt ordinances requiring short-term rental platforms to provide physical address information, listing identifiers, license numbers, and transient occupancy tax certification data for rentals operating within their jurisdictions. This legislation may provide the City with a new enforcement mechanism to improve identification of unpermitted rentals, strengthen transient occupancy tax compliance, and reduce investigative time associated with locating suspected violations. Importantly, SB 346 does not automatically impose these requirements; local implementation would require Council adoption of an ordinance establishing reporting requirements and enforcement provisions. City staff are currently looking into whether a local ordinance based on the new legislation would be beneficial to enforcement efforts. Preliminary discussions with those familiar with the field and research has indicated that local ordinances are likely to draw legal challenges. As of early 2026, relatively few California jurisdictions have formally adopted implementing ordinances pursuant to SB 346; Cathedral City appears to be potentially the only City that has adopted an ordinance in response to SB 346, though several cities with existing short-term rental enforcement programs already maintain similar reporting and platform compliance frameworks. Safe Housing Education and Enforcement Safe Housing enforcement addresses substandard rental conditions, unsafe occupancy situations, and minimum habitability requirements for housing units. This work includes both enforcement and education components, helping ensure rental units meet State and local safety standards while providing tenants and property owners with information about compliance. Safe Housing enforcement is guided by a combination of California Health and Safety Code, the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), and the building and residential codes adopted by the City through Chapter 15.02 of the Municipal Code. The City has formally adopted the California Building Code, California Residential Code, and related codes (Title 24), as well as the International Property Maintenance Code, which together establish minimum standards for both the construction and ongoing maintenance of structures. The IPMC serves as the primary standard for evaluating existing housing conditions and requires that structures be maintained in a safe, sanitary, and habitable condition. These standards address essential life-safety and habitability requirements, including structural soundness, safe electrical and plumbing systems, adequate heating and ventilation, weather protection, and the provision of basic facilities such as hot and cold running water, sanitary fixtures, and adequate space for occupancy. The IPMC also regulates occupancy limits, maintenance of building systems, and the general condition of interior and exterior environments to ensure they do not pose a risk to occupants. Item 4a In parallel, the California Building Code and Residential Code establish requirements for construction and building systems and require that most construction, alteration, repair, or modification of a structure be performed under a valid permit. Pursuant to Section 105.1 of the California Building Code and Section R105.1 of the California Residential Code, property owners must obtain permits prior to constructing, enlarging, altering, repairing, moving, demolishing, or changing the occupancy of a structure, as well as for modifications to electrical, gas, mechanical, or plumbing systems. This process ensures that work is reviewed and inspected for compliance with applicable safety standards. While certain minor work is exempt from permit requirements under Sections 105.2 and R105.2, these exemptions do not authorize work that violates code requirements or creates unsafe conditions. In practice, Code Enforcement staff frequently encounter unpermitted work—such as garage conversions, unapproved electrical or plumbing installations, or structural alterations—that contribute directly to substandard housing conditions. These cases often require both correction of unsafe conditions and retroactive compliance with permitting requirements. Under California Health and Safety Code, a building is considered “substandard” when conditions exist that endanger the life, health, or safety of occupants or the public. These conditions include inadequate sanitation (such as lack of plumbing fixtures, hot water, or heating), structural hazards (such as deteriorated foundations, walls, or roofs), faulty weather protection (including water intrusion), unsafe building systems, pest infestation, mold, accumulation of debris or waste, and inadequate fire safety or exiting conditions. Code Enforcement staff use these criteria, in conjunction with IPMC standards, to evaluate and document violations during inspections. In practice, Safe Housing enforcement focuses on ensuring that rental housing remains safe for occupancy by addressing both ongoing maintenance violations and underlying building deficiencies. This includes correcting life-safety hazards such as exposed wiring or structural instability, resolving sanitation issues such as lack of water or sewage service, addressing environmental concerns such as mold or pest infestation, and ensuring that any construction or alterations have been properly permitted and inspected. Together, these standards establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for safe and habitable housing and form the basis for enforcement actions. Safe Housing cases are among the most complex and time-consuming handled by the Division. They often involve structural, electrical, plumbing, or habitability issues, and may require extended case management, coordination with Building and Fire staff, and ongoing monitoring. In addition to enforcement, staff spend significant time providing education and guidance to tenants and property owners. The primary challenge is balancing the high resource demand of these cases with broader enforcement responsibilities. Unlike many exterior nuisance cases, Safe Housing matters also frequently involve interior conditions, tenant-landlord dynamics, and structural or building system deficiencies that require technical evaluation and sustained case management. Based on calendar-year reporting, the Division received 68 substandard rental housing Item 4a complaints in 2023, 95 in 2024, and 96 in 2025, with 30 complaints received to date in 2026. During the same period, total Code Enforcement investigation requests were 1,090 in 2023, 1,451 in 2024, 1,336 in 2025, and 483 to-date in 2026. As a result, Safe Housing complaints have consistently accounted for approximately 6 to 7 percent of all investigation requests annually. It should be noted that renters can be hesitant to submit requests for investigation regarding safe housing issues due to retaliation from landlords, which may impact the number of requests received by the City. A substantial share of Safe Housing complaints result in formal enforcement action, though annual totals vary significantly based on the nature and scale of individual cases. In 2023, 19 substandard housing code cases were opened. In 2024, 58 substandard housing cases were opened, representing a substantial year-over-year increase; notably, 14 of these cases were associated with a large apartment complex involving approximately 120 individual units with identified substandard conditions, which significantly amplified enforcement workload despite being grouped into a limited number of case files. In 2025, 36 substandard housing cases were opened, remaining above 2023 levels but below the unusually high 2024 volume. These figures demonstrate that raw case counts alone may not fully capture program workload, as certain cases—particularly large multi-unit properties—can require extensive inspections, documentation, coordination, and follow-up comparable to dozens of smaller individual cases. ‘Safe Housing’ Complaints Calendar Year Safe Housing Complaints Received Total Investigation Requests Safe Housing % of All Requests Substandard Housing Code Cases Opened 2023 68 1,090 6.20% 19 2024 95 1,451 6.50% 58¹ 2025 96 1,336 7.20% 36 2026 (to date) 30 483 6.20% 15 ¹ Of the 58 cases opened in 2024, 14 were associated with a large apartment complex involving approximately 120 individual units with identified substandard housing violations, Safe Housing enforcement also includes an education and outreach component. Staff have participated in Cal Poly’s Off-Campus Housing & Resource Fair to provide students with information regarding tenant rights, complaint procedures, and minimum housing standards. Education is routinely provided directly to tenants and property owners during complaint investigations. However, outreach remains largely reactive and case-specific. Because the City does not maintain a comprehensive inventory of rental properties, the Division does not have a complete picture of where rental housing is located, limiting the ability to conduct targeted communication, trend analysis, or preventative outreach. Item 4a Long-Duration and High Resource Cases impacting neighborhood wellness Some code enforcement cases remain open for extended periods due to complexity, financial hardship, structural issues, or repeated non-compliance. These cases often involve unsafe housing conditions, unpermitted construction, zoning violations, or long- term monitoring requirements. While relatively small in number, they require sustained staff attention and can significantly affect workload distribution. Examples of these cases include 1150 Laurel Lane, which has required a significant amount of staff time from multiple departments over the past year. Other examples include a large scale inspection of the Madonna Road Apartments, which took place over 5 days in an effort to inspect 120 residential units to identify potential electrical hazards. Inspection required collaboration with apartment management and electrical contractors who were on site and able to correct many of the required repairs the same day they were identified. Another example is a property located at the corner of Casa Street and Murray Street in which staff identified a vacant property that had been unlawfully occupied by several transient individuals. Staff documented the deterioration over several months, issued several citations as a result of non-compliance and eventually, due to the imminent danger posed by the property and the lack of response by the property owner, moved to board all structures on site to prevent further unauthorized entry. The property was declared a public nuisance after a public hearing was held in which staff presented on the documented conditions. These efforts were the result of a two and half year process in which the property owner only complied after a public nuisance hearing. The case remains open and is currently being reassessed for continuing violations. Long-duration cases often require repeated inspections, coordination with multiple departments, and legal or administrative processes. The primary challenge is balancing continued management of these complex cases while maintaining response to new complaints. Council direction may clarify whether long-term case resolution should be prioritized relative to rapid response to new investigations. Summary The staff report illustrates that there is expanding volume of requests and increasing complexity of cases, particularly those involving safe housing, fraternity and sorority enforcement, and multifamily structural safety. This increase in requests impacts staff’s ability to engage in broader strategic and program-development work that would strengthen long-term outcomes. As such, staff has made several recommendations in this report that address the need to prioritize analysis and implementation of program efficiencies. Item 4a Council Focus Questions This study session is an opportunity for the City Council and community to hear about code enforcement in the City. In addition, staff will be available at the City Council meeting to answer questions about the contents of this report. The City Council may wish to consider the following broad questions during the Study Session. • Staff Recommendations. Does the City Council concur with the staff recommendations outlined above related to a. Affirming the current Enforcement Priorities and Response Time Standards, b. Exploring a simplified Administrative Fine Structure, c. Adding a work program item to create a new regulatory structure for Fraternity and Sorority Houses, d. Continuing the enforcement of fraternity and sorority land use violations consistent with the Enforcement Priorities and Response Time Standards while prioritizing violations that result in disturbance to others, and e. Directing staff to undertake work to analyze time-intensive enforcement areas to identify potential process efficiencies? • Neighborhood Wellness & Property Maintenance Standards. Are there any neighborhood wellness, property maintenance, or nuisance standards the Council wishes to update in light of current operational challenges and evolving community needs? • Future Study Sessions. Would the Council like future, topic-specific study sessions to support more in-depth policy development? Previous Council or Advisory Body Action As described in this report, the City Council has discussed code enforcement and safe housing issues extensively in the past. Previous actions are noted below. • 2005 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Rental property inspection program • Review and discuss options for rental property inspections. • Provide staff with direction on which options to pursue, with a focus on full cost recovery regardless of which option the Council selects. o Action: Limit program to state mandated fire safety inspections of multifamily rental units • 2009 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Strategies to reduce neighborhood noise and party disturbances.  Receive a report outlining various strategies to reduce the occurrences of neighborhood disturbances created by excessive noise and party activity;  Provide direction to staff regarding the following strategies and programs: Item 4a a. Noise ordinance modifications b. Unruly gathering ordinance c. Nighttime curfew ordinance d. Strategic use of Safety Enhancement Zone Ordinance e. Residential rental property licensing options  Direct to staff to return to Council in January 2010 with any recommended ordinances and procedural changes. o Action: Council direction staff to move forward with options B, C and D and to return to Council in January 2010 with recommended ordinances and procedural changes. • 2014 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Review of rental housing inspection program options  Receive a presentation on Rental Housing Inspection Program policy options.  Provide direction to staff regarding initiation of an ordinance and specific options to pursue. o Action: Council vote to create a Rental Housing Inspection Program for single - family and duplex rental within the following parameters: • Scope of Inspection: Both exterior and interior inspections. • Frequency of Inspection: 3 years. • Incentives: • Self- certification after passing initial inspection. • System and standards to authorize self -certification period. • Disincentives: High fines or re-inspection fees. • Potential Exemptions:  Owner - occupied units (or occupancy by an immediate family member without other renters).  Units in mobile home parks.  Publicly owned or managed housing.  Units governed by homeowner associations.  Set fees at full cost recovery. o 2015 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Rental housing inspection program  Adopt an Ordinance amending Titles 15 of the Municipal Code by adding Chapter 15.10 establishing a Rental Housing Inspection Program; and  Adopt a Resolution establishing fees to implement the Rental Housing Inspection Program; and  Adopt a Resolution establishing an amnesty program for one year for properties subject to the proposed Rental Housing Inspection Program who voluntarily report and abate health and safety violations. o Action: Ordinance & Resolutions adopted. • 2017 – Special Meeting of the City Council o Item Discussed: Workshop to allow community members to provide input regarding issues and solutions for the RHIP. Item 4a o Action: Council voted to suspend new mandatory inspections and conclude existing code compliance cases under the program. • 2017 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: An ordinance repealing chapter 15.10 rental housing inspection program of title 15 of the municipal code. o Action: Council voted to introduce Ordinance No. 1632 entitled, " An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, repealing chapter 15. 10 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code regarding Rental Housing Inspection." • 2017 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Process to develop code enforcement priorities for proactive and complaint-based enforcement activities. o Action: By consensus, Council directed staff to receive and file a presentation on the status of Community Development code enforcement activities in the City of San Luis Obispo and provided staff with direction on the development of revised code enforcement priorities for the 2017- 19 Financial Plan. • 2017 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Code enforcement priorities. o Receive a presentation, take public testimony, and provide direction to staff regarding:  Overall code enforcement priorities to guide the allocation of staff time and other resources in the Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department (CDD); and  Direction regarding the use of enforcement tools - such as recorded notices of violation and increased and new fees and fines - to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of code enforcement activities; and  The scope and priority of a Safe Housing Outreach and Education Program for landlords and tenants; and  Additional program activities and enhancements to pursue as resources permit. o Action: Council supported staff's recommendation without the voluntary inspections program and self -certification program. Staff to return with Ordinances and/ or Resolutions to implement the changes to the code enforcement process and a new fine structure. • 2018 – City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: An ordinance amending chapter 1.24 (administrative code enforcement procedures) of title 1 to the San Luis Obispo municipal code; and a resolution of the city council of the city of San Luis Obispo, California, amending the amount of administrative fines payable under certain citations. o Action: Council voted to adopt both the introduced ordinance and resolution. • 2019– City Council Meeting Item 4a o Item Discussed: Resolution establishing authorizing designated staff to waive administrative fines resulting from code enforcement action o Action: Council voted to adopt proposed resolution. • 2023– City Council Meeting o Item Discussed: Study session: Code enforcement update  Council Direction Item #1: Is the program achieving the outcomes of the council and community?  Council Direction Item #2: What information can the Community Development Department provide to help the community navigate the code enforcement process and services?  Council Direction Item #3: What information would be most helpful to provide specifically for landlords and tenants in the City?  Council Direction Item #4: Do you generally concur with the existing priority hierarchy of cases? o Action: By consensus, the City Council provided the following comments for staff on the Code Enforcement Division, no formal action was taken. 1. Careful balance, the goal is safe housing and compliance 2. Outreach, Brochure, and Meet CalPoly halfway 3. Follow up with notes from Stakeholder Meetings 4. Make sure to reach out to tenant groups and marginalized groups 5. Reach out Cuesta College 6. How to use Ask SLO Video? Public Engagement City Staff informed interested parties about the study session including Cal Poly, Interfraternity Council, the SLO Tenants Union, the Chamber of Commerce, local Realtors, the Developer’s Roundtable, and Residents for Quality Neighborhoods. In addition, social media posts provided information about the study session to the public. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. As a study session, this item is informational only and is not binding on future actions. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeted: N/A Budget Year: 2025-26 Funding Identified: N/A Item 4a Fiscal Analysis: Funding Sources Total Budget Available Current Funding Request Remaining Balance Annual Ongoing Cost General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 State Federal Fees Other: Total $0 $0 $0 $0 This study session itself does not have any direct fiscal impacts as it is for informational purposes only. Any future changes in staffing may result in fiscal impacts. ALTERNATIVES The City Council may provide feedback not contemplated in the Focus Questions above. ATTACHMENTS N/A 65 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Monday, May 11, 2026 11:04 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Szentesi, Whit Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, Please see proposed statement below. Whit can send to Bulbul to close the loop if you are good. Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions. Greg From: Hermann, Greg Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 9:36 AM To: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org>; Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, Whit and I both believe a statement is more appropriate. Whit provided a draft and we’ve had a brief conversation, but I need to land the plan on a recommendation. We will touch base this morning and close the loop with you. Greg From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 9:04 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Good morning, Checking in on whether a response was sent back to Bulbul on this request? Thanks much! Whitney From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 12:13 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney and Whit, 66 I'm working on a longer story about certain county residents who lack political power but monitor local government in different ways, such as writing blogs, attending CSD/City Council meetings, frequently emailing staff, filing public records requests, and alerting the public about issues they've observed. The people profiled are Kathie Walker, Christine Heinrichs, Aaron Ochs, Julie Tacker, April Dury, and Ron Crawford. While I've spoken with all of them, I'm interested in speaking with county, city, and CSD officials about the impact these citizens have on the community, how it affects staff handling their requests/demands, whether they've brought about change, and your thoughts on these figures who've become familiar faces in government proceedings. I understand Kathie is a polarizing figure given her scrutiny of how fraternities operate in the city, but this is a broader story about the people themselves and why they do what they do. It's not a deep dive into the specific issues that these community members are passionate about. If you're comfortable discussing this, do you or the person you think is appropriate have availability for a phone interview sometime Thursday? I appreciate any time you can dedicate. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 67 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Monday, May 11, 2026 9:36 AM To:McDonald, Whitney; Szentesi, Whit Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney, Whit and I both believe a statement is more appropriate. Whit provided a draft and we’ve had a brief conversation, but I need to land the plan on a recommendation. We will touch base this morning and close the loop with you. Greg From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 9:04 AM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO Good morning, Checking in on whether a response was sent back to Bulbul on this request? Thanks much! Whitney From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 12:13 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney and Whit, I'm working on a longer story about certain county residents who lack political power but monitor local government in different ways, such as writing blogs, attending CSD/City Council meetings, frequently emailing staff, filing public records requests, and alerting the public about issues they've observed. The people profiled are Kathie Walker, Christine Heinrichs, Aaron Ochs, Julie Tacker, April Dury, and Ron Crawford. While I've spoken with all of them, I'm interested in speaking with county, city, and CSD officials about the impact these citizens have on the community, how it affects staff handling their requests/demands, whether they've brought about change, and your thoughts on these figures who've become familiar faces in government proceedings. I understand Kathie is a polarizing figure given her scrutiny of how fraternities operate in the city, but this is a broader story about the people themselves and why they do what they do. It's not a deep dive into the specific issues that these community members are passionate about. 68 If you're comfortable discussing this, do you or the person you think is appropriate have availability for a phone interview sometime Thursday? I appreciate any time you can dedicate. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 69 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Monday, May 11, 2026 9:04 AM To:Szentesi, Whit; Hermann, Greg Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO Good morning, Checking in on whether a response was sent back to Bulbul on this request? Thanks much! Whitney From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 12:13 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney and Whit, I'm working on a longer story about certain county residents who lack political power but monitor local government in different ways, such as writing blogs, attending CSD/City Council meetings, frequently emailing staff, filing public records requests, and alerting the public about issues they've observed. The people profiled are Kathie Walker, Christine Heinrichs, Aaron Ochs, Julie Tacker, April Dury, and Ron Crawford. While I've spoken with all of them, I'm interested in speaking with county, city, and CSD officials about the impact these citizens have on the community, how it affects staff handling their requests/demands, whether they've brought about change, and your thoughts on these figures who've become familiar faces in government proceedings. I understand Kathie is a polarizing figure given her scrutiny of how fraternities operate in the city, but this is a broader story about the people themselves and why they do what they do. It's not a deep dive into the specific issues that these community members are passionate about. If you're comfortable discussing this, do you or the person you think is appropriate have availability for a phone interview sometime Thursday? I appreciate any time you can dedicate. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly 70 San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 71 From:Hermann, Greg Sent:Tuesday, May 5, 2026 7:02 PM To:McDonald, Whitney Cc:Szentesi, Whit Subject:RE: Media request: New Times SLO Whit and I can chat about a recommended approach and following up. I’m wondering about a simple statement, but we’ll connect and close the loop with you. Greg From: McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 6:49 PM To: Hermann, Greg <GHermann@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Media request: New Times SLO FYI From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 12:13 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney and Whit, I'm working on a longer story about certain county residents who lack political power but monitor local government in different ways, such as writing blogs, attending CSD/City Council meetings, frequently emailing staff, filing public records requests, and alerting the public about issues they've observed. The people profiled are Kathie Walker, Christine Heinrichs, Aaron Ochs, Julie Tacker, April Dury, and Ron Crawford. While I've spoken with all of them, I'm interested in speaking with county, city, and CSD officials about the impact these citizens have on the community, how it affects staff handling their requests/demands, whether they've brought about change, and your thoughts on these figures who've become familiar faces in government proceedings. I understand Kathie is a polarizing figure given her scrutiny of how fraternities operate in the city, but this is a broader story about the people themselves and why they do what they do. It's not a deep dive into the specific issues that these community members are passionate about. If you're comfortable discussing this, do you or the person you think is appropriate have availability for a phone interview sometime Thursday? I appreciate any time you can dedicate. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) 72 Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution 73 From:McDonald, Whitney Sent:Tuesday, May 5, 2026 6:49 PM To:Hermann, Greg Subject:FW: Media request: New Times SLO FYI From: Bulbul Rajagopal <brajagopal@newtimesslo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 12:13 PM To: Szentesi, Whit <wszentes@slocity.org>; McDonald, Whitney <WMcDonal@slocity.org> Subject: Media request: New Times SLO Hi Whitney and Whit, I'm working on a longer story about certain county residents who lack political power but monitor local government in different ways, such as writing blogs, attending CSD/City Council meetings, frequently emailing staff, filing public records requests, and alerting the public about issues they've observed. The people profiled are Kathie Walker, Christine Heinrichs, Aaron Ochs, Julie Tacker, April Dury, and Ron Crawford. While I've spoken with all of them, I'm interested in speaking with county, city, and CSD officials about the impact these citizens have on the community, how it affects staff handling their requests/demands, whether they've brought about change, and your thoughts on these figures who've become familiar faces in government proceedings. I understand Kathie is a polarizing figure given her scrutiny of how fraternities operate in the city, but this is a broader story about the people themselves and why they do what they do. It's not a deep dive into the specific issues that these community members are passionate about. If you're comfortable discussing this, do you or the person you think is appropriate have availability for a phone interview sometime Thursday? I appreciate any time you can dedicate. Best, Bulbul ––––– Bulbul Rajagopal (she/her) Staff Writer New Times Media Group PRINT · DIGITAL · MOBILE · TICKETING NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo County's News & Entertainment Weekly San Luis Obispo | (805) 592-0412 | www.NewTimesSLO.com SUN Northern Santa Barbara County's News & Entertainment Weekly Santa Maria | (805) 347-1968 | www.SantaMariaSun.com 74 MY805TIX Your Local Ticketing Solution