The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPRR26387 Emails and Calendars1 From:Armas, Sara Sent:Monday, July 27, 2026 4:37 PM To:Stowe, Lala; Wooten, Eric Cc:Shirley, Michelle; Tway, Timothea (Timmi); City_Attorney; CityClerk Subject:Public Records Request – PRR26387 McMahon - Records relating to 1364 San Marcos Court (Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83) Attachments:PRR26387 McMahon - Records relating to 1364 San Marcos Court (Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83).pdf; California Public Records Act Request Hello, Attached is a Public Records request from Michael McMahon for records related to 1364 San Marcos Court/Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83, first response due by 08/06/2026. Note that the Attorney’s Office will conduct a search for all emails that involve City email addresses; we ask staff conduct searches for non-City email correspondence only. Also note that Eric is OoO this week, and has expressed it would really help him/the Attorney team if staff could confirm if they do/do not have records as soon as possible. If you are not able to meet that deadline, please advise. Otherwise, please send the requested responsive documents to cityclerk@slocity.org. Thanks! Sara Armas pronouns she/her/hers Deputy City Clerk II City Administration 990 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E SArmas@slocity.org T 805.781.7110 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738-2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081). Without limiting the foregoing, I specifically request: 1. Any title reports, preliminary title reports, vesting deeds, grant deeds, easement deeds, recorded maps, parcel maps, subdivision maps, certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, or other recorded instruments analyzing, discussing, or determining that Parcel 1 has legal access rights. 2. Any staff memoranda, notes, legal analyses, correspondence, emails, meeting notes, plan-check comments, or internal communications referencing an access easement to Parcel 1. 3. Any communications between the City and the property owner, applicant, surveyor, engineer, title company, attorney, or consultant concerning access to Parcel 1. 4. Any reports, memoranda, or analyses prepared by or provided to the City regarding access to Parcel 1. 5. Any documents referencing a finding that Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. For electronic records, I request production in native electronic format whenever available, including emails and their attachments. If any responsive records are withheld, please identify each withheld record and the specific statutory basis for the withholding. Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85- 83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738- 2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004- 782- 081). Without limiting the foregoing, I specifically request: 1. Any title reports, preliminary title reports, vesting deeds, grant deeds, easement deeds, recorded maps, parcel maps, subdivision maps, certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, or other recorded instruments analyzing, discussing, or determining that Parcel 1 has legal access rights. 2. Any staff memoranda, notes, legal analyses, correspondence, emails, meeting notes, plan-check comments, or internal communications referencing an access easement to Parcel 1. 3. Any communications between the City and the property owner, applicant, surveyor, engineer, title company, attorney, or consultant concerning access to Parcel 1. 4. Any reports, memoranda, or analyses prepared by or provided to the City regarding access to Parcel 1. 5. Any documents referencing a finding that Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. For electronic records, I request production in native electronic format whenever available, including emails and their attachments. If any responsive records are withheld, please identify each withheld record and the specific statutory basis for the withholding. 1 From:Lisa Perez <lperez@carnaclaw.com> Sent:Monday, July 27, 2026 4:25 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Michael McMahon Subject:California Public Records Act Request Attachments:Hatalsky - 2026.07.27 Public Records Request.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Dear City Clerk: Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738-2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081). The records specifically requested are included in the attached City of San Luis Obispo Request for Public Records form. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thank you, Lisa Perez Paralegal for Mike McMahon Lisa M. Perez | Paralegal 1908 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446 694 Santa Rosa Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 office: 805-226-4148 | direct: 805-226-5940 | fax: 805-226-4147 www.carnaclaw.com Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738-2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081). Without limiting the foregoing, I specifically request: 1. Any title reports, preliminary title reports, vesting deeds, grant deeds, easement deeds, recorded maps, parcel maps, subdivision maps, certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, or other recorded instruments analyzing, discussing, or determining that Parcel 1 has legal access rights. 2. Any staff memoranda, notes, legal analyses, correspondence, emails, meeting notes, plan-check comments, or internal communications referencing an access easement to Parcel 1. 3. Any communications between the City and the property owner, applicant, surveyor, engineer, title company, attorney, or consultant concerning access to Parcel 1. 4. Any reports, memoranda, or analyses prepared by or provided to the City regarding access to Parcel 1. 5. Any documents referencing a finding that Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. For electronic records, I request production in native electronic format whenever available, including emails and their attachments. If any responsive records are withheld, please identify each withheld record and the specific statutory basis for the withholding. 2 From:Lisa Perez <lperez@carnaclaw.com> Sent:Monday, July 27, 2026 4:25 PM To:CityClerk Cc:Michael McMahon Subject:California Public Records Act Request Attachments:Hatalsky - 2026.07.27 Public Records Request.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Dear City Clerk: Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738-2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081). The records specifically requested are included in the attached City of San Luis Obispo Request for Public Records form. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thank you, Lisa Perez Paralegal for Mike McMahon Lisa M. Perez | Paralegal 1908 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446 694 Santa Rosa Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 office: 805-226-4148 | direct: 805-226-5940 | fax: 805-226-4147 www.carnaclaw.com Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code § 7920.000 et seq.), I request copies of all records in the possession, custody, or control of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding, relating to, referencing, or evaluating the access to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map PM 85-83 (hereinafter “Parcel 1”) (City File SBDV-0738-2024; 1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081). Without limiting the foregoing, I specifically request: 1. Any title reports, preliminary title reports, vesting deeds, grant deeds, easement deeds, recorded maps, parcel maps, subdivision maps, certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, or other recorded instruments analyzing, discussing, or determining that Parcel 1 has legal access rights. 2. Any staff memoranda, notes, legal analyses, correspondence, emails, meeting notes, plan-check comments, or internal communications referencing an access easement to Parcel 1. 3. Any communications between the City and the property owner, applicant, surveyor, engineer, title company, attorney, or consultant concerning access to Parcel 1. 4. Any reports, memoranda, or analyses prepared by or provided to the City regarding access to Parcel 1. 5. Any documents referencing a finding that Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. For electronic records, I request production in native electronic format whenever available, including emails and their attachments. If any responsive records are withheld, please identify each withheld record and the specific statutory basis for the withholding. 3 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Friday, April 17, 2026 4:09 PM To:Symens, Sadie; Estrada, Ethan; Patino, Mallory; Gomez, Ivana Subject:FW: Cooper Easement Dispute FYI below for Bob’s response. Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: bob cooper < Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 4:01 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Cooper Easement Dispute Ok sounds good! Thanks for getting back to us so promptly! Have a great weekend! Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Friday, April 17, 2026, 3:55 PM, Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Bob, We heard back from the City Attorney’s office on this. Their guidance is the following: If your attorney can provide the City with a legal authority that the City has an obligation to stay development while the parties’ rights are adjudicated or if your attorney transmits a temporary restraining order on injunction issued by the Court showing that the Court has found that Mr. Hatalsky does not presently have the right to the easement in question then City staff can put a system hold on any proposed development of the Hatalsky property. Absent that, City staff cannot place a hold for development over the Hatalsky property. I did check with Mallory though (and you can confirm this with the link she sent you separately) and there are no active permit applications (at this time) for the Hatalsky property. 4 We will wait to hear from you and your attorney as your case progresses. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 2:32 PM To: 'bob cooper' < Cc: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org>; Gomez, Ivana <igomez@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Cooper Easement Dispute Hi Bob, Replying to confirm receipt. I also cc’d the folks you mentioned you also sent this to so that everyone in on the same page. We will send this to our City Attorney’s office and provide an update soon. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer 5 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: bob cooper < Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 12:10 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: Cooper Easement Dispute Hi Gabriel, When I last met with you over the counter at the planning department you said that if I could prepare a statement as to what has taken place regarding this purported easement you would be able to present it to the City Attorney. Could you please let me know if you are able to share this message with the City Attorney? I am writing this message in response to information we received about the approval of a lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court which is an adjacent property to our residence. This proposed lot split seems to have been approved based upon use of a falsely claimed appurtenant easement across our property at 2685 Johnson Avenue. We are attaching the formal complaint that was filed with the Superior Court for your reference. We are seeking a temporary administrative hold on any further actions by the SLO City planning and building departments regarding the proposed development of the property at 1364 San Marcos Ct. (Hatalsky Property). Please let us know if a temporary hold can be put in place until this matter can be decided by the Superior Court Of California Thank You Robert & Amy Cooper 15 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Friday, April 17, 2026 2:32 PM To:bob cooper Cc:Estrada, Ethan; Patino, Mallory; Gomez, Ivana Subject:RE: Cooper Easement Dispute Hi Bob, Replying to confirm receipt. I also cc’d the folks you mentioned you also sent this to so that everyone in on the same page. We will send this to our City Attorney’s office and provide an update soon. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: bob cooper < Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 12:10 PM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: Cooper Easement Dispute Hi Gabriel, When I last met with you over the counter at the planning department you said that if I could prepare a statement as to what has taken place regarding this purported easement you would be able to present it to the City Attorney. Could you please let me know if you are able to share this message with the City Attorney? I am writing this message in response to information we received about the approval of a lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court which is an adjacent property to our residence. This proposed lot split seems to have been approved based upon use of a falsely claimed appurtenant easement across our property at 2685 Johnson Avenue. We are attaching the formal complaint that was filed with the Superior Court for your reference. 16 We are seeking a temporary administrative hold on any further actions by the SLO City planning and building departments regarding the proposed development of the property at 1364 San Marcos Ct. (Hatalsky Property). Please let us know if a temporary hold can be put in place until this matter can be decided by the Superior Court Of California Thank You Robert & Amy Cooper 17 From:bob cooper < Sent:Friday, April 17, 2026 1:06 PM To:Patino, Mallory Cc:Gomez, Ivana Subject:Cooper Contest of Lot Split Attachments:Cooper_-_Complaint_ 4172026.pdf It was nice to meet you at the counter of the planning department a couple of weeks ago. I am writing this message in response to information we received about the approval of a lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court which is an adjacent property to our residence. This proposed lot split seems to have been approved based upon use of a falsely claimed appurtenant easement across our property at 2685 Johnson Avenue. We are attaching the formal complaint that was filed with the Superior Court for your reference. We are seeking a temporary administrative hold on any further actions by the SLO City planning and building departments regarding the proposed development of the property at 1364 San Marcos Ct. (Hatalsky Property). Please let us know if a temporary hold can be put in place until this matter can be decided by the Superior Court Of California Thank You Robert & Amy Cooper 18 From:bob cooper < Sent:Friday, April 17, 2026 12:10 PM To:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Subject:Cooper Easement Dispute Attachments:Cooper_-_Complaint_ 4172026.pdf Hi Gabriel, When I last met with you over the counter at the planning department you said that if I could prepare a statement as to what has taken place regarding this purported easement you would be able to present it to the City Attorney. Could you please let me know if you are able to share this message with the City Attorney? I am writing this message in response to information we received about the approval of a lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court which is an adjacent property to our residence. This proposed lot split seems to have been approved based upon use of a falsely claimed appurtenant easement across our property at 2685 Johnson Avenue. We are attaching the formal complaint that was filed with the Superior Court for your reference. We are seeking a temporary administrative hold on any further actions by the SLO City planning and building departments regarding the proposed development of the property at 1364 San Marcos Ct. (Hatalsky Property). Please let us know if a temporary hold can be put in place until this matter can be decided by the Superior Court Of California Thank You Robert & Amy Cooper 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Dustin M. Tardiff – SBN 281241 TARDIFF & SALDO LAW OFFICES P.O. Box 1400 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Tel: (805) 457-4578 Fax: (805) 457-4581 dustin@tardiffsaldo.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Robert and Amy Cooper SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ROBERT COOPER, an individual; and AMY COOPER, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. PAUL HATALSKY, an individual; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. )))))))) )))) )))))))))))))))) CASE NO.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES [UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE] 1. TO ESTABLISH ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT 2. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 3. QUIET TITLE 4. DECLARATORY RELIEF 5. TRESPASS 6. CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENT Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs ROBERT COOPER and AMY COOPER allege as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiffs ROBERT COOPER and AMY COOPER are individuals, husband and wife, residing in San Luis Obispo County, California, and are the owners of real property located at 2685 Johnson Avenue, San Luis Obispo, California (the “Cooper Property”). 2. Defendant PAUL HATALSKY (“Defendant”) is an individual residing in San Luis Obispo County, California, and the owner of real property located at 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California (the “Hatalsky Property”), which is adjacent to the Cooper Property. 3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise of defendants sued herein as DOES 1-50, are unknown to plaintiffs at the time of filing of this Complaint, who therefore sue said defendants by such fictitious names. 4. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that each of the defendants were the agents, employees, and representatives of the other defendants and in doing the things hereinafter alleged were in part, acting within the scope and authority of such relationship, and in part, acting outside the scope and authority of such relationship, and as such, each is responsible and liable in some manner for the occurrences herein alleged and were a proximate cause of plaintiff’s damages as herein alleged. 5. Plaintiffs will ask leave of Court to amend this Complaint to show such true names and capacities of such defendants when the names of such defendants have been ascertained. Plaintiffs are informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the defendants designated herein as a DOE is responsible in some manner and liable herein by reason of negligence and other actionable conduct and by such conduct, proximately caused the injuries and damages to plaintiffs as hereinafter further alleged. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. The acts complained of herein occurred at, and the properties at issue are located in, San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California. 7. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds $35,000.00 and plaintiffs seek to, among other things, quiet title to real property. Further, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 392, the subject real property is located in this County. This action is therefore within the unlimited jurisdiction of this court. \\\ Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS The Properties 8. Plaintiffs are the owners of the Cooper Property. 9. The Cooper Property includes a private driveway that provides access from Johnson Avenue and runs along the eastern boundary of the property (the “Driveway”). 10. The Driveway is privately owned and has at all relevant times been used exclusively by Plaintiffs; since at least 2003. 11. Defendant owns the adjacent Hatalsky Property. Purchase and Sale Information of the Cooper Property 12. On or around December 31, 2003, the Ward Family sold the Cooper Property to Plaintiffs. Purchase and Sale Information of the Hatalsky Property 13. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that on or around July 23, 1986, the Ward family sold the Hatalsky Property to Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss (the “Reiss Family”). 14. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that on or around December 30, 1998, the Reiss Family sold the Hatalsky Property to Frank Taylor. 15. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that on or around June 6, 2003, Frank Taylor sold the Hatalsky Property to Paul Hatalsky. The 2003 Grant of Easement 16. On or about December 30, 2003, the prior owners of the Cooper Property, the Wards, executed a Grant of Easement in favor of Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss (the “Reiss Family”). The easement granted was a: “non-exclusive easement, for purposes of ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities, over and through” the Cooper Property. 17. The Grant of Easement expressly provided: “Said grant of easement shall be in gross, until such time as grantees… acquire an ownership interest in the adjacent real property… At which time said easement shall become appurtenant…” The easement created by this instrument is referred to herein as the “Reiss Gross Easement.” A true and accurate copy this Grant of Easement is attached as EXHIBIT 1 to this Complaint. The phrase: “At which time said easement shall become appurtenant to the described adjacent real property” is purposefully highlighted on EXHIBIT 1. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 VERIFIED COMPLAINT The Condition Precedent Was Never Satisfied 18. The Reiss Family never acquired ownership of the adjacent property described in the Grant of Easement. 19. Because this condition precedent did not occur: • The easement never became appurtenant; • No easement appurtenant benefiting the Hatalsky Property was ever created; • The easement remained, at most, a limited personal right in gross. Non-Use and Abandonment 20. The Reiss Gross Easement was never used. 21. Neither the Reiss Family nor Defendant ever: • Used the Driveway for ingress or egress; • Used the easement area for development; or • Exercised any rights under the purported easement. 22. The Driveway has been used exclusively by Plaintiffs since at least 2003. 23. The easement area has been blocked by fencing and landscaping for many years. The 2021 Assignment 24. On or about November 1, 2021, Collette M. Reiss executed an Assignment of Grant of Easement in favor of Defendant. 25. The Assignment acknowledges that the interest being transferred is an: “Easement (in gross).” 26. The Assignment purports to transfer: “Grantor’s entire interest in the Easement (in gross)… including any rights to acquire an appurtenant easement…” A true and accurate copy of the Assignment is attached as EXHIBIT 2 to this Complaint. The phrase: “At which time said easement shall become appurtenant to the described adjacent real property” which is highlighted on EXHIBIT 1, is completely omitted from the Assignment on EXHBIT 2. 27. At the time of the Assignment: • No appurtenant easement existed; • The condition precedent had not been satisfied; • The assignor held no transferable appurtenant property interest. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 VERIFIED COMPLAINT The 2021 Assignment is Invalid and/or Void 28. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that the purported assignment of the Reiss Gross Easement is invalid and ineffective because the Reiss Gross Easement was created as a personal right in gross in favor of specifically identified individuals, namely Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, and was not intended to be transferable. 29. The Grant of Easement contains no language extending the benefit of the easement to “heirs,” “successors,” or “assigns,” and instead ties the easement expressly to those named individuals and to a condition precedent that was never satisfied. 30. The 2021 Assignment, by its express terms and/or necessary implication, reflects an intent to limit the easement to specific persons. The express identification of the individual grantees, the conditional nature of the easement, and the absence of any language authorizing transfer evidences the non- transferability of the Reiss Gross Easement. 31. Plaintiffs are further informed and believe that the purported assignment was executed by Collette M. Reiss after the death of Jerry M. Reiss, further evidencing that the easement was treated as a personal right rather than a freely transferable property interest. The Assignment also materially alters and omits critical language from the original Grant of Easement, including the condition that the easement would become appurtenant only upon acquisition of the adjacent property, which never occurred. As such, the purported assignment attempts to transfer a non-vested, personal, and conditional right that had already expired, been abandoned, or was otherwise nontransferable. Prior Subdivision Application and City Denial 32. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that in or between 2004 and 2006, Jerry Reiss, a predecessor in interest to Defendant, applied to the City of San Luis Obispo for approval of a minor subdivision of the Hatalsky Property (then under Reiss’s control), which would have created an additional residential lot to be accessed via the same Driveway located on the Cooper Property. 33. The proposed subdivision relied upon the same access route that Defendant now claims a right to use; namely, the Driveway located on the Cooper Property, purportedly pursuant to the Reiss Gross Easement. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 34. On September 13, 2006, the City of San Luis Obispo Planning Commission denied the proposed subdivision, and that denial was subsequently upheld on appeal by the City Council. A true and correct copy of the City’s denial and supporting findings is attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3. 35. In denying the subdivision, the City made express findings that the proposed use of the Driveway for access to an additional residential lot was unsafe, noncompliant, and detrimental to the public, including but not limited to findings that: 36. The site was “not suited for the type and design of the subdivision due to the inability to create safe, logical site access”; • The proposed subdivision would be “detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare”; • The existing access driveway was too narrow to safely accommodate additional traffic or emergency vehicles; and • The proposed use of the driveway was inconsistent with applicable Subdivision Regulations and General Plan policies designed to protect existing residential neighborhoods. 37. The City further determined that the proposed subdivision improperly relied upon an access configuration in which the rear parcel would not own the accessway in fee, but instead would rely on an easement over the Cooper Property. An arrangement the City found to be inconsistent with applicable municipal code requirements. 38. The City additionally concluded that expanding use of the existing Driveway to serve additional residential development would: • Increase traffic hazards at Johnson Avenue; • Eliminate existing landscape buffers and privacy protections; and • Adversely impact multiple neighboring properties, including what is now the Cooper Property. 39. The subdivision application denied in 2006 is materially identical to Defendants’ current development plan in that both rely upon the same alleged easement over the Cooper Property for access to additional residential development. 40. The conditions identified by the City in 2006, including inadequate width, safety concerns, lack of compliant access, and reliance on an easement rather than fee ownership, remain unchanged today. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 41. Following the denial, the Reiss Family abandoned their development plans. In or around late 2008 or early 2009, Jerry Reiss contacted Plaintiff Robert Cooper and stated that he had: • “given up,” • wanted “to be done with it,” and • had “completely given up on the idea of using [the Cooper Property] driveway for access.” Defendant’s Threatened Conduct 42. Beginning in or around 2024 – 2025, Defendant began asserting a right to use the purported easement to develop the Hatalsky Property. 43. Defendant has: • Caused a surveyor to enter the Cooper Property; • Asserted a right to use the Driveway; • Represented that he intends to commence construction; • Indicated that such construction will rely on use of the purported easement. 44. Defendant’s conduct is ongoing and poses an imminent threat of invasion of Plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs’ Objection and Cease-and-Desist 45. On August 20, 2024, Plaintiffs, through counsel, sent Defendant PAUL HATALSKY, a cease-and- desist letter demanding that he refrain from entering the Cooper Property and asserting that the easement is unenforceable. A true and accurate copy of that Cease-and-Desist Letter is attached as EXHIBIT 4 to this Complaint. 46. Defendant has refused to comply and continues to assert rights to use the Cooper Property. Defendant’s 2025 Lot Split Approval Based on Mischaracterized Easement 47. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that in or around November 2025, Defendants applied for and obtained approval from the City of San Luis Obispo for a lot split of the Hatalsky Property pursuant to a ministerial process, including Senate Bill 9 (“SB-9”). 48. In connection with that approval, Defendant submitted and/or relied upon a parcel map that identifies the Reiss Gross Easement as an “appurtenant access easement” benefiting the Hatalsky Property. A true and correct copy of said map is attached hereto as EXHIBIT 5 with the incorrect language regarding the Reiss Gross Easement highlighted for ease of reference. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 49. That representation is false. As alleged herein: • The 2003 Grant of Easement expressly created an easement in gross, not appurtenant; • The easement was subject to a condition precedent that never occurred; • No appurtenant easement was ever created; and • The purported easement remained, at most, a limited personal right that has since been abandoned. 50. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that the City’s 2025 approval was ministerial in nature and did not include any adjudication of private property rights, including the validity, scope, or existence of any easement. As such, the City’s approval does not establish that any valid easement exists, nor does it authorize Defendants to enter or use the Cooper Property. No Administrative Remedy 51. The City of San Luis Obispo has approved Defendant’s lot split as a ministerial act and has expressly stated that disputes regarding easement rights are civil matters between property owners. Plaintiffs have no adequate administrative remedy. Irreparable Harm 52. Defendant’s threatened actions will result in: • Physical invasion of Plaintiffs’ property; • Increased traffic and safety risks; • Construction and permanent alteration of the land; • Loss of exclusive possession. 53. These harms are irreparable and cannot be adequately compensated by monetary damages. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT) By Plaintiffs Against Defendants 54. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs. 55. Plaintiffs seek a determination that the Reiss Gross Easement has been abandoned and that the record title to the Cooper Property is free of the burden of the Reiss Gross Easement and from any claims of defendants. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 56. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon alleges, that the Reiss Gross Easement has not been used for at least over two decades, if ever. 57. Prior owners and/or successors-in-interest of the Reiss Gross Easement confirmed their intent to abandon and relinquish any claim of right to use the Driveway or Reiss Gross Easement located on the Cooper Property. 58. Plaintiffs have continuously, and without interruption, maintained and used their driveway covering the Reiss Gross Easement for at least 23 years preceding the commencement of this action in an actual, open, notorious, exclusive, hostile, and adverse manner and has expressly excluded prior owners of the Hatalsky Property and all others from any use of the driveway on the Cooper Property, thereby preventing the use of the extinguished Reiss Gross Easement by the current and prior owners of the Hatalsky Property, including Defendants. 59. Defendants have no right, title, estate, lien, or interest whatsoever in the Cooper Property or in the unused, abandoned, disclaimed and extinguished Reiss Gross Easement. 60. Plaintiff seeks a determination declaring the Reiss Gross Easement extinguished and abandoned. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS) By Plaintiffs Against Defendants 61. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs. 62. Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed if Defendants are allowed to trespass onto the Cooper Property for any purpose including surveying, building, clearing, grading, or other uses, which are incidental to the use of the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement. 63. Defendants have threatened to and have trespassed on Plaintiffs’ property, the Cooper Property, and have threatened to use the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement to develop the Hatalsky Property, including but not limited to clearing landscaping, destroying Plaintiffs’ personal property, installing utilities, and other work incidental to the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 64. Plaintiffs seek a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction restraining Defendants and each of them from entering the Cooper Property for any purpose which is incidental to the use of the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement, until a trial on the merits. 65. After trial, if Plaintiffs are the prevailing parties, Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction restraining Defendants and each of them from trespassing on the Cooper Property, or from using the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement, or doing anything incidental to the use of the abandoned Reiss Gross Easement. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (QUIET TITLE) By Plaintiffs Against Defendants 66. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs. 67. Defendants, and each of them, have no right, title, or interest in the Cooper Property, or if they have some interest in the Reiss Gross Easement, that interest has been abandoned. In any event, the Reiss Gross Easement is merely in-gross and not appurtenant. 68. Plaintiffs seek to quiet title to the Cooper Property, with a finding that the Reiss Gross Easement is not owned by Defendants or has been abandoned and is not enforceable by Defendants, or by their successors in interest. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (DECLARATORY RELIEF) By Plaintiffs Against Defendant 69. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs. 70. An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the Plaintiffs and Defendants concerning their respective rights and duties. Plaintiffs contend that the Reiss Gross Easement was extinguished and terminated by virtue of, among other reasons, abandonment, disuse, adverse possession and exclusion by Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and, on that basis, allege that Defendants dispute these contentions. Plaintiffs are not aware of any basis other than the extinct Reiss Gross Easement for a claim of right to use, interfere with or damage the Cooper Property. 71. Plaintiffs desire a judicial determination of their rights and duties, and a declaration that the Reiss Gross Easement has terminated. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 72. A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time so that Plaintiffs may ascertain their rights and duties because Defendants have demanded that Plaintiffs allow access to the Driveway for their use and purposes as alleged above. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (TRESPASS) By Plaintiffs Against Defendant 73. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs. 74. On the dates alleged herein, continuing to the present time, Defendant, without Plaintiffs’ consent entered into the Cooper Property, which Plaintiffs are the owner and possessor, and caused others to enter onto the Cooper Property, for general construction purposes and to the detriment and damage of Plaintiffs’ property. 75. As a proximate result of the Defendant’s entry onto the Plaintiffs’ land for general construction purposes, Plaintiffs have suffered harm and damages in an amount to be proven at trial. Further, Plaintiffs will suffer greater and further damage as Defendant has clearly communicated that he intends to continue trespassing and causing damage to Plaintiffs’ property through general construction efforts. 76. The aforementioned acts of the Defendant were willful and oppressive or fraudulent or malicious or a combination thereof in that 77. Defendant’s wrongful conduct in entering the Cooper Property, causing others to enter the Cooper Property, and beginning construction efforts on the Cooper Property, unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury through the ongoing injury to the Cooper Property and will deprive Plaintiffs of peace of mind and a safe and secure dwelling. 78. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for the injuries currently being suffered and which are threatened. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Cancellation of Instrument – § Civ. Code, 3412) By Plaintiffs Against Defendant 79. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference all allegations in the foregoing paragraphs Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 80. California Civil Code, section 3412 provides: “A written instrument, in respect to which there is a reasonable apprehension that if left outstanding it may cause serious injury to a person against whom it is void or voidable, may, upon his application, be so adjudged, and ordered to be delivered up or canceled.” 81. The 2003 easement grant (EXHIBIT 1) and 2021 assignment (EXHIBIT 2) are written instruments. The form and contents of the Reiss Gross Easement and Assignment are attached to this complaint as Exhibit 1 and 2 respectively and incorporated by reference. 82. As described herein, the condition precedent was not satisfied, and the Reiss Gross Easement is void or voidable against Plaintiffs. 83. As described herein, the Reiss Gross Easement is abandoned, and the assignment of the Reiss Gross is void or voidable 84. If left outstanding, these instruments create a cloud on the Plaintiffs’ title, causing injury by impairing their ability to sell, finance, or develop the property. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as follows: FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION FOR ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT: 1. For a judgment that the Reiss Gross Easement has been extinguished, terminated and abandoned and that the Cooper Property is unencumbered by such easement or any other claims by Defendants of a right to use, go upon, cross over or interfere with Plaintiffs’ property at 2685 Johnson Avenue. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS: 2. For a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction restraining and enjoining Defendants, and each of them, and their agents, employees, contractors, representatives, and all persons acting in concert with them, from: • Entering upon, using, or otherwise accessing the Cooper Property, including but not limited to the Driveway, for any purpose, whether related to ingress, egress, construction, development, or otherwise; Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12 VERIFIED COMPLAINT • Asserting, claiming, or attempting to exercise any rights under the purported easement described in the 2003 Grant of Easement or the 2021 Assignment, including any claim that such easement is appurtenant to the Hatalsky Property; • Commencing, permitting, or continuing any construction, grading, clearing, improvement, or development activities that rely upon access over the Cooper Property; • Causing or permitting any third parties, including but not limited to contractors, surveyors, engineers, or utility providers, to enter upon or use the Cooper Property; • Interfering in any manner with Plaintiffs’ exclusive possession, use, and enjoyment of the Cooper Property, including but not limited to the Driveway; and • Recording, relying upon, or otherwise using any map, instrument, or document that incorrectly identifies the purported easement as appurtenant to the Hatalsky Property, in a manner that would affect Plaintiffs’ title or property rights. 3. For an order requiring Defendants to immediately cease and desist from any such conduct. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION FOR QUIET TITLE: 4. For a judgment quieting title in Plaintiffs as the owner of the Cooper Property, and that Defendants have no interest in the Cooper Property, the Driveway or the Reiss Gross Easement; FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF: 5. For a judicial declaration that the Reiss Gross Easement has been extinguished and terminated by abandonment, prescription misuse or excessive use, adverse possession, or otherwise; 6. For a judicial declaration that the Reiss Gross Easement, even if not abandoned, extinguished or lost through disuse and prescription do not give Defendants the right to use the Driveway or the Reiss Gross Easement as demolition and construction access easements or to use the Driveway to access or stage construction. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR TRESPASS: 7. For general damages in an amount according to proof; 8. For special damages in an amount according to proof; 9. For an order requiring the Defendant to show cause, if he has any, why he should not be enjoined as hereinafter set forth, during the pendency of this action; Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13 VERIFIED COMPLAINT 10. For a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and a permanent injunction, all requiring Defendant and his agents, servants, employees, contractors, and all persons acting under, in concert with, or for him: • Entering upon, using, or otherwise accessing the Cooper Property, including but not limited to the Driveway, for any purpose, whether related to ingress, egress, construction, development, or otherwise; • Asserting, claiming, or attempting to exercise any rights under the purported easement described in the 2003 Grant of Easement or the 2021 Assignment, including any claim that such easement is appurtenant to the Hatalsky Property; • Commencing, permitting, or continuing any construction, grading, clearing, improvement, or development activities that rely upon access over the Cooper Property; • Causing or permitting any third parties, including but not limited to contractors, surveyors, engineers, or utility providers, to enter upon or use the Cooper Property; • Interfering in any manner with Plaintiffs’ exclusive possession, use, and enjoyment of the Cooper Property, including but not limited to the Driveway; and • Recording, relying upon, or otherwise using any map, instrument, or document that incorrectly identifies the purported easement as appurtenant to the Hatalsky Property, in a manner that would affect Plaintiffs’ title or property rights 11. For an order requiring Defendants to immediately cease and desist from any such conduct. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CANCELLATION OF INSTRUMENT: 1. That Defendant deliver the 2003 Grant of Easement (EXHIBIT 1) and 2021 Assignment (EXHIBIT 2) immediately to the clerk of the court for cancellation. 2. For damages, in the event that Defendant fails to surrender the 2003 Grant of Easement (EXHIBIT 1) and 2021 Assignment (EXHIBIT 2) for cancellation pursuant to the judgment, in an amount to proven at trial, plus interest thereon from and after as compensation and in lieu of cancellation; \\\ \\\ Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14 VERIFIED COMPLAINT AS TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION: 3. For costs of suit and prejudgment interest; 4. For such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper. DATED: April 17, 2026 TARDIFF & SALDO LAW OFFICES By: ___________________________ Dustin M. Tardiff Attorney for Plaintiffs Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15 VERIFIED COMPLAINT VERIFICATION I, Robert Cooper, am one of the plaintiffs in this action. I have read the foregoing Complaint for the following: (1) Establish Abandonment Of Easement; (2) for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary, and Permanent Injunction; (3) for Quiet Title; (4) for Declaratory Relief; (5) for Trespass; and (6) for Cancellation of Instrument, and the matters stated therein are true of mv own knowledge, except as to those matters that are stated upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on _______________________ in San Luis Obispo County, California. _______________________________________ Robert Cooper Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16 VERIFIED COMPLAINT VERIFICATION I, Amy Cooper, am one of the plaintiffs in this action. I have read the foregoing Complaint for the following: (1) Establish Abandonment Of Easement; (2) for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary, and Permanent Injunction; (3) for Quiet Title; and (4) for Declaratory Relief; (5) for Trespass; and (6) for Cancellation of Instrument, and the matters stated therein are true of mv own knowledge, except as to those matters that are stated upon information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on _______________________ in San Luis Obispo County, California. _______________________________________ Amy Cooper Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 4/17/2026 EXHIBIT 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 EXHIBIT 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 EXHIBIT 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 council M°°- Iq IDLA j acEnaa Report I=N C I T Y OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Philip Dunsmore, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION TO DENY A MINOR SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO LOTS FROM ONE LOT AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT. (MS 158-04) CAO RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution, denying the appeal, and upholding the Planning Commission's action to deny the subdivision, based on findings. DISCUSSION Background The applicant/appellant, Jerry Reiss, would like to subdivide the existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court, creating a new vacant lot that would share an existing flag lot driveway access with three other properties at 2675 though 2685 Johnson Avenue. The proposed map includes three exceptions to the flag lot standards, MC 16.18.060 of the Subdivision Regulations: accessway width, accessway landscape setbacks, and ownership of the accessway. The ownership situation surrounding the proposed subdivision is somewhat convoluted since the appellant, Jerry Reiss, no longer owns the property which he is trying to subdivide. Instead, the property is currently owned by Paul and Julie Hatalsky. The Hatalskys previously purchased the subject property from Jerry Reiss subject to an agreement that Mr. Reiss could later subdivide the rear half of the property for his own interest. Prior to selling the property to the Hatalskys, Mr. Reiss also secured an access easement from a property owner at 2685 Johnson Avenue. 2685 Johnson Avenue is the back lot on an existing flag-lot subdivision that has a total of four houses on it (see Attachment 1). The property owner that originally sold Mr. Reiss the easement has since sold the property to Robert Cooper. Mr. Cooper testified at the Planning Commission hearing that he is not in support of the proposed subdivision and does not support the use of the easement. The history of the ownership, and the easement, however, does not affect the applicability of the Subdivision Regulations, or the City's ability to act on the request. Subdivision Exceptions The Subdivision Regulations implement specific standards that are designed to protect existing neighborhoods while implementing the General Plan and Subdivision Map Act. Mr. Reiss' proposed subdivision map requests the following exceptions to these regulations: y- Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 2 1. Access-way Modifications The existing (and proposed) accessway is 19 feet wide and the minimum width required is 20 feet MC 16.18.060 C, below). Although a 1-foot difference is not significant, the available area to improve the accessway with a new driveway is hampered by utilities, trees and other improvements that encroach into the accessway..Additionally, the existing residence at Johnson Avenue is right at the edge of the accessway with no setback. The minimum driveway width for this subdivision should be 16 feet while the existing driveway is approximately 10 feet wide. MC 16.18.060 C. The accessway (access lot, not driveway width) to the rear shall be at least twenty feet (20') wide for residential and conservation open space zones and 40 feet wide for commercial zones (except the C-D zone which is 15 feet). Driveway width and paving shall be determined by the City parking and driveway standards and is subject to approval of the Community Development Department Director based on use, distance, number of parking spaces and/or units served. 2. Access-way Landscape Setbacks The Subdivision Regulations require that a minimum of eight feet be reserved between the access driveway and existing residential structures (MC 16.18.060 E, below) Presently, the access driveway is about 1-foot from an existing residence and there is a narrow landscape planter approximately 5 to 6 feet in width) along one side of the driveway. Widening the driveway to allow two-way vehicle access or fire truck access is likely to completely eliminate the existing landscape buffer. MC 16.18.060 E. Each lot shall have yards as required by the Zoning Regulations. A landscape area with sufficient width to plant screening shrubs and trees (minimum of eight feet) shall be reserved between the access driveway (and any required turn- around areas)and existing or proposed residential structures. 3. Ownership of Access-way The access-way is currently a part of the rearmost lot (2685 Johnson Avenue). With the proposed subdivision, the rearmost lot would be the Reiss parcel; however Reiss would not own the accessway. Instead he would utilize an easement over it. MC 16.18.060 H requires that the lot furthest from the street own the accessway in fee. Planning Commission Action Based on neighborhood testimony and staff description of insufficient site access, the Planning Commission unanimously denied the subdivision request at a hearing on September 13, 2006 Attachments 3, 4, and 5 Planning Commission minutes, resolution and staff report). Neighbors that share the existing accessway on Johnson Avenue expressed concerns about the loss of landscape and privacy due to the proposed widening of the driveway. Other concerns include increased vehicle trips onto Johnson Avenue and excessive trash and recycling bins at the narrow driveway frontage at Johnson Avenue. Commissioners noted that they would support the map if alternative access to San Marcos or Augusta Avenue could be achieved. The basis for denial is especially ya Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 3 related to the unique access request within an existing flag lot easement that currently serves three other residences from Johnson Avenue. The existing access is too narrow to allow for safe vehicular access or fire truck access and the addition of another lot on this accessway only exacerbates the problem. Appeal An appeal was received from the applicant, Jerry Reiss on September 21, 2006. Mr. Reiss is appealing the Planning Commissions action and believes that he has provided a sufficient access plan for the proposed lot. Specifically, Mr. Reiss' appeal provides two reasons to justify the appeal. Each of Mr. Reiss' appeal points, in italics below, is followed by an evaluation of the particular point. 1. The General Plan Policy of infill development within the City of San Luis Obispo was not given full weight in the consideration. Attachment 3 includes the Planning Commission staff report. The Planning commission was presented with a complete General Plan analysis including a detailed project description. Infill development is supported when the development is compatible with the existing neighborhood and when it does not create significant health, safety or welfare issues. In fact, at the Planning Commission hearing, Commissioners stated that they would support the map if the applicant could find reasonable access to either Augusta Street or San Marcos Court. The proposed access route to Johnson Avenue was the PC's concern that tipped the scale between logical infill and an infeasible request that will negatively impact the neighborhood while supplying only one building site. In regards to GP policies regarding infill development, there are none which speak directly to the circumstances of this appeal. The most relevant reference to infill development is a program in the Housing Element that addresses infill. Program 6.3.9 reads: Balance City efforts to encourage residential development by focusing as much on infill development and densification within the City Limits as on annexation of new residential land." However, there are many General Plan Housing and Land Use Element policies that are also designed to protect residential neighborhoods. For example, Policy 3.2.6 of the Housing Element: Preserve the fabric, amenities, yards, (i.e. setbacks) and overall character and quality of life of established neighborhoods" Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 C' Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 4 2. There is potential of improving a non-conforming driveway which will provide additional safety for all residents along the access easement and better sight distances and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue. Although the plan does indicate widening and improving the existing driveway, sight distance and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue would be unchanged unless parking from Johnson Avenue is elimindated and significant trees and other vegetation are removed from the easement area. Rather than improve the situation, widening of the driveway would eliminate privacy and shade while decreasing the aesthetic appearance of yards that abut the access driveway. The positive benefits of widening the driveway are overshadowed by the negative impacts that would burden at least six existing dwellings (three dwellings on the access driveway and three others on adjacent properties that abut the driveway). Conclusion Encouraging the expanded use of the existing access driveway out to Johnson Avenue is not consistent with the intent of the Subdivision Regulations or the applicable General Plan Policies. The Flag Lot Standards in the Subdivision Regulations (MC 16.18. 060) are designed to implement General Plan Policies in regards to protecting existing yards, properties and neighborhoods. These standards require significant landscape buffers, and other design standards that are intended to screen backyards and residential bedrooms from vehicular driveways. The proposed plan conflicts with these important standards and would eliminate existing screening. As noted earlier, the map might be supported by the Planning Commission if alternative access plans to Augusta Street were to be achieved. CONCURRENCES The Public Works Department (Transportation Division)and the Fire Department have reviewed the site and have commented on the proposed access plan. The Fire Department would require fire truck access on the driveway and a turn around area. The Transportation Division agreed that the existing access-way is not appropriate to accommodate an additional dwelling and that widening and tree removals would have to occur to increase access sight distance. FISCAL IMPACT When the General Plan was prepared, it was accompanied by a fiscal impact analysis, which found that overall the General Plan was fiscally balanced. Accordingly, since the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, it has a neutral fiscal impact. ALTERNATIVES 1. Uphold the appeal, thereby approving the minor subdivision to allow a new lot behind the existing residence at 1364 San Marcos Court. Upholding the appeal would require staff to prepare an environmental analysis with the need to return to Council to review and adopt the L/-y Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 l Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 5 environmental document and a revised resolution. The recommended action does not include an environmental analysis since the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not require such an analysis when the project is to be denied. If the Council wishes to approve the appeal it may also want to add specific subdivision_ and access driveway conditions when the item returns to Council. 2. Continue the item for additional analysis or research, Council should specify the information needed and to provide staff with specific direction in order to return to a hearing at a later date. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Vicinity Map Attachment 2: Reduced scale site plan and project details Attachment 3: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Attachment 4: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission Resolution Attachment 5: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission staff report Attachment 6: Appeal to City Council Attachment 7: Draft Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission action to deny the minor subdivision. G:\CD-PLAN\Pdunsmore\Subdivisions\MS 158-04(1364 San Marcos)\AP CC158-04 11-14-06.doc y- Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 6A VICINITY MAP iFile No. 151 1364 San Marcos Ct . Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 AttachmenI. 2 San Luis Obispo City Planning Department 990 Palm Street P.O. Box 8100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100 Re: Minor Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I have made application to subdivide the property located at 1364 San Marcos Court into two parcels. The newly created vacant.parcel will be approximately 9,400 s.f. in size and be accessed from Johnson Avenue by way of an existing driveway and easement. The remaining parcel at 1364 San Marcos Court will revert back to the original.configuration, as subdivided in 1971. The two parcels were combined in the mid 1980's. City Planning has notified me that two items may be of concern and need to be addressed: easement width and lot location. The following discussion addresses each of these concerns. 1. EASEMENT WIDTH: The existing driveway easement is nineteen feet wide in lieu of the now required twenty foot width. The easement has been in constant use by three parcels for approximately fifteen or more years. The rear parcel owns the land upon which the easement exists. 2. LOT LOCATION: City regulations require the lot which is farthest away from the street to own the land underlying the driveway easement. The rear property line of the proposed new lot extends twenty-five feet farther back than the easement lot. However, both lots were originally equidistant from Johnson Avenue until a lot line adjustment was allowed, which moved the easement lot rear property line twenty-five feet closer to the street. Additionally, access to the garage on the easement lot extends.beyond the end of the driveway easement held by the new lot. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AIIG e,$ 29 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a-7 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me, if you have further questions or need further clarification. ZBest gards, er Reiss 820 Walnut Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 y- Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 U n pql J ma$ a aN4 alb n d m aea kr ash U o 12: RaI L Lg s AV NOSNHOr W g sx gal I I I i I I h 1H I F I I m' I I h a a 9 e afd' In C11CCR c wee lel 7° 4N OG I yll - Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 achment 2 g €€ 3 1OK6 VO'odslgp sin-1 ueg'any uosugor 6L9Z R n v o uolslMpquS sslaa N, gsuawanojduq ReMeApa posodoid S o W ow pp tO d 2:) Z O o y J I WU a 1 I m I W a I 1 g g I U J W U K Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 J Attachment 3 SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 13, 2006 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Commissioners Charles Stevenson, John Ashbaugh, Andrew Carter, Jason McCoy, Peter Brown, Vice-Chair Carlyn Christianson, and Chairperson Andrea Miller Absent: Commissioners Carlyn Christianson Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Assistant City Attorney Christine Dietrick, and Recording Secretary Jill Francis ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Commissioners or staff may modify the order of items. MINUTES: Minutes of August 23, 2006. Approve or amend. The minutes of August 23, 2006, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1364 San Marcos Court MS and ER 158-04: Consideration of a tentative parcel map creating two lots from one lot, and environmental review; R-1 zone, Jerry Reiss, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending the Commission deny the proposed vesting tentative parcel map based on findings which he explained. Andrew Merriam, Wallace Group, representative for the applicant, spoke in support of the request, explained how the driveway would be widened to improve conditions, and described how there were no other access opportunities Jerry Reiss, property owner, was available for questions. PUBLIC COMMENTS: A letter was presented to the Commission from a neighbor opposing the project. Rolf Monteen, SLO, spoke against the project, explained the impact of the project to his property, was concerned about the loss of trees and vegetation; felt the driveway would Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Planning Commission Minui._ Attachment 3September13, 2006 Page 2 be better served going to Augusta Street, and presented photos to show the size of the current driveway. Eric McSwain, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the project, expressed concerns with increased traffic on Johnson Avenue and the extended driveway. Scott Moran, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project, discussed the driveway dimensions and presented photos, and expressed safety concerns with vehicles exiting onto Johnson Avenue. Ed Mayo, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the increased density, and opposed the project.. Chris Burtness, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the project and voiced concerns with the easement created in 2003 which his family was unaware of. George Shamis, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project and noted concerns with changes occurring in the neighborhood. Mark Ekhert, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with noise and increased density, noting his opposition to the project. Robert Cooper, San Luis Obispo, owner of the current driveway that would need to be widened, spoke against the project and did not support the easement. Craig Adams, San Luis Obispo, had concerns with traffic and density, and expressed opposition to the request. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission discussed the history of the proposed lot, the access, and complexities of the ownership and easement issues. They encouraged the applicant to seek alternative access to another street other than Johnson Avenue. Commr. Stevenson discussed the proposed driveway and possible widening, as well as loss of vegetation. Commr. Ashbaugh asked staff about other possibilities for the parcel if this project is denied. Commr. McCoy asked where the original access for parcel was located. He noted he could not support the project because of neighborhood concerns with fire and traffic safety, and another dwelling unit. Commr. Carter asked about the original access to the lot. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Planning Commission Minu,_,'3 Attachment 3 September 13,2006 Page 3 Commr. Miller discussed possible avenues for the owner with the denial of this project. On motion by Commr. Carter to deny the proposed tentative parcel map. Seconded by Commr. Ashbaugh. AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Stevenson, Brown, McCoy, Carter, Miller NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Christianson RECUSED: None The motion carried on a 6 :0 vote. 2. 1772 Calle Joaquin.U 123-05; Request to construct a wireless telecommunications facility camouflaged by two 31- foot tall faux trees; C/OS-10 zone; Cingular Wireless, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending approval of the use permit, based on findings and subject to conditions. Jeff Jacobsen, Infranext, applicant's representative, described the simulated trees and clarified the location of the facilities. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION.COMMENTS: Commr. Stevenson spoke in favor of the project with protection of existing trees and vegetation. On a motion by Commr. Brown to approve the use permit, based on findings and subiect-to conditions. Seconded by Commr. McCoy. AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Brown, Miller, McCoy, Stevenson NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Carter ABSENT: Commr. Christianson The motion carried on a vote of 5: 0. 3. 1908 Ruth Street. MS and ER 109-06; Consideration of a tentative parcel map creating two parcels (3,085 sq. ft. and 4,389 sq. ft. ) from one lot, with exceptions to Y1 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 r Attachment 4 RESOLUTION NO. 5462-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING THE VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR A MINOR SUBDMSION LOCATED AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT MS/ER 158-04 (SLO 04-0338) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 13, 2006, to consider the applicant's request for a tentative parcel map to create two lots from an existing lot with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance Section, Section 16.18.060 flag lot requirements, for property located at 1364 San Marcos Court; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo has considered testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and evaluation and recommendations by staff; and BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. 1. The site is not suited for the type and design of the subdivision due to the inability to create safe, logical site access. 2. The exception would allow approval of a minor subdivision that will result in improvements that will be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3.Granting the exception is not in accord with the intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations since the proposed access driveway does not meet required dimensions and required landscape buffering would not be possible. 4. Approval of a subdivision with the proposed access through a non-conforming flag lot is- not snotconsistentwithGeneralPlanLandUseandHousingElementpoliciesthataredesigned to protect existing neighborhoods. In particular; granting access for this new property out to Johnson Avenue is inconsistent with Land Use Element Policy 2.2.5 which states that new residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. MS 158-04 (County Map No. SLO 04-0338) and requested exceptions are hereby denied. qzl Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 MS 158-04 Resolution to dei '7'13 Attachment 4 Page 2 On motion by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Carter, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Brown, Miller, Carter, McCoy and Stevenson NOES: None REFRAIN: None ABSENT: Commr. Christianson The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of September, 2006. Doug Da ' son, Secretary Planning Commission L S Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 5 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMM SSSION AGENDA REPORT ITEM# 1 BY: Philip Dunmore`,`Associate Planner(781-7522) MEETING DATE: September 13, 2006 Pf FROM: Pamela Ricci,, Senior Planner FILE NUMBER: MS/ER 158-04 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1364 San Marcos Court SUBJECT: Review of a proposed vesting tentative parcel map with exceptions to the flag lot standards contained in the Subdivision Regulations to create two lots from one existing lot at the end of San Marcos Court located between Augusta Street and Johnson Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to deny the proposed vesting tentative parcel map based on findings. BACKGROUND Situation The applicant would like to subdivide the existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court, creating a new vacant lot that would share an existing flag lot driveway access with three other properties at 2675 though 2685 Johnson Avenue. The proposed map includes exceptions to the flag lot standards, MC 16.18.060 of the Subdivision Regulations. The exceptions include reduced accessway width, reduced accessway landscape setbacks, and the lot furthest from the street would not own the accessway in fee. Data Summary Address: 1364 San Marcos Court Applicant: Jerry Reiss Property Owner: Paul and Julie Hatalsky Representative: Andrew Merriam Zoning: R-1 (Low:Density Residential) General Plan: Low-Density Residential Environmental Status: An initial study of environmental review has not been prepared for the project since CEQA does not require one for projects that are to be disapproved. Site Description The lot is on the north side of the cul-de-sac street known as San Marcos Court. San Marcos Court intersects with Augusta Street near Sinsheimer Park. The lot is approximately 14,617 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 2 square feet in area and contains an existing residence near the street. The rear of the parcel is vacant and does not contain significant landscape or vegetation with the exception of one large eucalyptus tree. The rear of the site abuts an existing flag lot accessway that contains a driveway serving three parcels from Johnson Avenue. The three parcels on Johnson Avenue are each independently owned and contain a total of four residences. The front lot, 2675 Johnson, contains a secondary dwelling unit that accesses the flag lot driveway. 2679 and 2685 each contain a single-family residence and each of these properties utilizes the flag lot driveway. Proiect Description The project includes splitting the existing lot into two parcels. Parcel 1 would be the vacant parcel, 7,969 square feet in area, at the rear of the site adjacent to the flag lot accessway from Johnson Avenue. Parcel 1 would be 6,648 square feet in area and encompass the existing residence at 1364 San Marcos. In order to improve visibility and access, the applicant would improve the existing driveway from Johnson Avenue by widening and clearing back vegetation. In addition, the City Fire Department would require that a fire truck tum-around be provided on the new lot, prior to construction of a new residence. A recorded easement exists that allows for access to the San Marcos Court property through the existing flag lot driveway from Johnson Avenue. Although 1364 San Marcos previously contained two parcels in the same configuration as this subdivision request, the City Engineer is requiring that a new map be prepared to formalize the lots rather than a certificate of compliance since there is not sufficient record to verify the legality of the lots. EVALUATION The proposed vesting tentative parcel map will result in two conforming lots in terms of their overall areas and dimensions. However, the proposal to establish and improve access to a new lot from an existing non-conforming flag lot subdivision is a major concern given the range of necessary exception requests it requires, the potential•impacts to adjacent residents, and the. serious traffic and safety issues that are intensified. Due to the proposed access and the numerous conflicts it creates with General Plan Policy and the Subdivision Regulations, staff cannot support the subdivision proposal. If there were options to access this property, such as through the existing residence at San Marcos, or through an existing flag lot subdivision at Augusta Street, many of the significant concerns might be overcome. The following portions of the evaluation section discuss the project's lack of consistency with the General Plan and Subdivision Regulations in greater detail. 1. General Plan The following paragraphs evaluate the proposed project for consistency with applicable General Plan Policies. General Plan Policy is in italics followed by staff's response. 7 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 L._A Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 3 Land Use Element LU 2.2.5 Street Access New residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and medium-or high density housing to driveways accessible from collector streets. Major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. Staffs Analysis: Johnson Avenue operates as an arterial street, with high traffic volumes and relatively high traffic speeds. Increasing the residential density on an existing non-conforming access driveway that intersects with Johnson Avenue is likely to create more intensive traffic and safety issues. The existing driveway is non-conforming since it is too narrow to accommodate two-way traffic (approximately 10 to 12 feet wide), and the existing residences and property lines are too close to the driveway to allow the driveway to be improved to an acceptable standard. If a vehicle is pulling out of the driveway when a vehicle wants to enter the driveway, traffic conflicts could occur on Johnson Avenue. City staff has visited the site with Public Works transportation staff, who recommends that if the subdivision were to be approved, that an alternative driveway access plan be mandated. The applicant has explored alternative access arrangements, including a driveway out to Augusta Street through another existing flag lot subdivision; however, such an arrangement has not been secured. Achieving access to San Marcos Court, through the front of the property, would seem to be the most logical solution to the problem. However, in order to achieve access to San Marcos, the existing residence would have to be modified, An additional complication to this subdivision request is that the applicant does not own the underlying property or residence on San Marcos. Instead this subdivision request is based upon a recorded agreement with the current property owner. The agreement allows the former property owner (Jerry Reiss, applicant) to subdivide the rear half of the property for his own interest. The agreement expires at the end of 2006. The agreement was recorded when Jerry Reiss sold the property to the current owner.. LU 2.2.12:Residential Project Objectives Residential projects should provide: A)Privacy,for occupants and neighbors of the project, E)Security and safety; F)Separate paths for vehicles and for people, and bike paths along collector streets; G)Adequate parking and storage space; I) Design elements that facilitate neighborhood interaction, such as front porches, front yards along streets, and entryways facing public walkways. Staffs Analysis: The site's flag lot configuration, shared driveway and limited access space makes it more difficult to design a project that easily complies with many of the objectives contained in General Plan Policy LU 2.2.12. The project's consistency with each objective is evaluated in the following paragraphs: Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 4 A) Developing a residence at this site will reduce privacy for neighbors of the project since existing landscape buffers at the edge of the driveway near private backyards would have to be removed to accommodate some widening of the driveway. E) Safety would be compromised by additional vehicle trips on an existing narrow driveway that intersects a busy arterial roadway. Even with required improvements, fire access and tum-around capabilities are likely to be marginal. F) There-is not enough room in the driveway to create separate paths for bikes or pedestrians. This exacerbates existing conditions since Johnson Avenue is not especially friendly for pedestrians and bicyclists given traffic volumes and rates of speed. G) Due to limited street frontage, parking demand issues within flag lot subdivisions are common. The new subdivision regulations .require that each of the lots within a flag lot subdivision provide one additional parking space than required by code. In this case, a new lot would be attached to an existing, developed flag lot subdivision; therefore, it would not be possible to place additional parking on separately owned, developed lots. However, the proposed lot, would be required to provide a total of three parking spaces plus space for a fire-truck turn- around. All of these improvements would severely compromise the lot's available building envelope. 1) The deep lot configuration, narrow driveway, and remote location of the lot in relation to the street would not allow for traditional design elements mentioned in I. Housing Element HE 3.2.6 Preserve the fabric, amenities, yards (i.e. setbacks), and overall character and quality of life of established neighborhoods. Staffs Analysis: Due to the required improvements to the existing access driveway to achieve fire access and some widening, the existing yards and quality of the setting would be compromised. The existing driveway is only 10 to 12 feet wide and bordered on one side by a heavy landscape screen and on the other side by existing residences (one residence is as close as 1-foot away from the existing driveway. The plans propose to widen the driveway to approximately fourteen feet with a couple of vehicle turn-outs that would be eighteen feet wide. The widening would result in the removal of important landscape screening that currently helps to buffer the driveway from adjacent rear yards of residences at 2699 and 2695 Johnson Avenue. The driveway improvements and the addition of a new residence at this location would not be consistent with Housing Element Policy 3.2.6. HE 7.2.1 Within established neighborhoods, new residential development shall be of a character, size, density and quality that preserves the neighborhood character and maintains the quality of life for existing and future residents. Staffs Analysis: The issue at stake is the quality of life for existing and future residents. The new lot and potential new residence will impact the quality of life for existing and future residents if the lot's access is taken through the existing flag-lot driveway out to Johnson Avenue. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 5 HE 7.2.6 Housing shall be sited to enhance safety along neighborhood streets... Staffs Analysis: As noted above in the Land Use Element discussion, the proposed access route through an existing non-conforming flag lot subdivision would compromise the safety of existing and future residents. 2.Subdivision Regulations The minor subdivision will be subject to processing under the City's flag lot standards of the Subdivision Regulations (MC 16.18.060, Attachment 5). Flag lots must be designed to conform to specific standards that are designed to minimize impacts to existing adjacent properties. In this case, the proposal will not create a new flag lot, but instead it will utilize an existing flag lot driveway to achieve access. Because of the age and intensity of existing development, necessary improvements to create logical access and buffering for existing properties would be difficult to achieve. The following discussion highlights the proposed project's consistency with applicable code requirements. The pertinent sections of the Subdivision Regulations are summarized in italics followed by staffs analysis. MC 1618.060 B. The original lot shall have frontage on a dedicated street of at least the minimum dimensions required by these regulations (20 feet). Staffs Analysis: The existing frontage for the rear parcel of the existing flag lot (2685 Johnson) is approximately 19 feet wide, which does not conform to current standards. No changes are proposed, or are possible to the frontage of the lot. The new lot (Parcel 1) would not have frontage on Johnson Avenue and would utilize an existing easement over a non-conforming flag- lot driveway to achieve access: MC 16.18.060 C. The access-way to the rear shall be at least 20 feet wide. Driveway width and paving shall be determined by the City parking and driveway standards and is subject to approval of the Community Development Director. Staffs Analysis: The existing flag-lot is approximately 19 feet wide; however the paved area of the existing driveway within the accessway lot is only about 10 to 12 feet wide. The Parking and Driveway Standards would require a driveway of this type to be a minimum of 16 feet wide to accommodate two-way traffic. Additionally, the Fire Department has requested that the driveway exceed this minimum standard and be improved to a 20-foot width with at least 13', 6" of vertical clearance. With existing conditions; widening the driveway beyond 14 feet would cause the removal of significant trees and other screening landscape, significantly impacting the existing residential properties adjacent to the driveway. Currently there are residences and other improvements that are within one or two feet of the existing driveway. Even if the driveway were widened to the greatest extent possible, given the physical constraints, it would not conform to required standards and would not allow sufficient width to allow two vehicles traveling in separate directions to pass each other. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attach mant 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 6 MC 16.18.060 E. Each lot shall have yards as required by Zoning Regulations. A landscape area with sufficient width to plant screening shrubs and trees (minimum of eight feet) shall be reserved between the access driveway (and any required turn-around areas) and existing or proposed residential structures. Staffs Analysis: Beyond potential traffic and safety impacts to Johnson Avenue, insufficient buffering between the driveway and existing properties is the most significant issue involved with this subdivision proposal. This code requirement was designed to implement General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.12 to ensure that existing residential yards and bedrooms would not be impacted by vehicles entering or exiting driveways. As mentioned above, the existing shrubs, trees and other improvements would have to be removed in order to improve the driveway for fire and vehicle access. Since minimum driveway width standards cannot be achieved, there is obviously no additional space to provide for the landscape setbacks required by MC 16.18.060 E. The proposal would leave landscape areas that range from 4 feet to 2 feet in width on one side and less than one foot on the other side. Landscape buffering for existing properties to the south would be impacted. The creation of one lot does not warrant the potential loss in privacy and quality of life for existing properties.. MC 16.18.060 F. For each residence served by a flag lot driveway, one additional off street parking space shall be provided. The parking space may not be within the street yard or in tandem to other required parking spaces. Staffs Analysis: The proposed lot would have to supply a total of three parking spaces in addition to a fire-truck tum-around, severely compromising the available building footprint. It would not be possible to require additional parking spaces for the existing developed lots taking access from the flag lot driveway since they are under separate ownership and are not part of this subdivision application request. Therefore, the parking requirement must be considered another exception sought by the applicant. The Commission.should also note, that street parking is very limited on Johnson Avenue, at least in part because of the concentration of flag-lot subdivisions in the vicinity. The proposed driveway improvements resulting from this map are likely to remove additional street parking spaces. MC 16.18.060 H. The lot farthest from the street shall own the accessway in fee. Other lots using the accessway shall have an access easement over it. Staffs Analysis: In this case, the proposed lot at the rear of 1364 San Marcos would be the lot furthest from Johnson Avenue, however the accessway is already owned in fee by 2685 Johnson Avenue. This map is asking for an exception to MC 16.18.060 H. Currently the property at 1364 San Marcos has an easement for access and maintenance over the existing accessway for 2685 Johnson. It is this particular easement that the applicant is relying upon for future access to the new lot. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 7 3. Property Development Standards No plans have been formalized to develop the proposed lot at this time, therefore it is not possible to evaluate specific development standards. The lot would have to include a 40-foot deep fire truck turn-around per City standard. Trash collection, site drainage and a reasonable building envelope are all potential issues. The site appears large enough to be able to accommodate an adequate building envelope even with the requited fire truck tum-around and compliance with other property development standards. As with any flag lot subdivision, trash collection would be problematic. A total of five residences would have to utilize the property frontage at 2675 Johnson Avenue on trash day. Typically, R-1 properties utilize,separate trash, greenwaste and recycling bins for a total of three separate bins per residence and a total of 15 bins possible on trash day. Given the limited sight distance and driveway access issues at Johnson Avenue, a large amount of trash bins in front of one residence would exacerbate existing conditions. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution denying the minor subdivision with exceptions. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue the item. An action to continue the item should include a detailed list of additional information or project modifications required. 2. Approve the map based on findings and subject to conditions. Staff would need to prepare the required environmental document and return to the Commission with a complete set findings, conditions, mitigation measures, and code requirements at a later date. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Vicinity map Attachment 2: Reduced scale project plans Attachment 3: Letters from applicant and applicants representative Attachment 4: Copy of recorded easement fordriveway access through 2685 Johnson Attachment 5: Flag Lot standards, MC 16.18.060 Attachment 6: Resolution denial of the minor subdivision of the tract map to City Council Enclosed: Full-size project plans. dAPdunsmore\Subdivisions\TR 159-05 (2932 Augusta)\TR 159-05 PC rpt(3-22-06).DOC Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 b .r Filing Fee: $10 Chmert 6 is RE Bvec J 21 J 0; Ic REFER TO SECnON4 SLO CITY CLERKsanlusoBpo APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMA77ON slcr" xt Reiss Name Mailing Address and Z-tp Code Phone Fax drew t+lerr arn X334 \lav r r+re Sl' . SLv g3s 1 Representative's Name Mailing Address and-Zip Code 6poisul6n 11=1410%Cw- cgs, 6-44 -4011 Title Phone Fax SECTION! SUBJECTOFAPPEAL 1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code(copy attached), I hereby appeal the decision of tfe0ii211?ii0ii 13°44 c1287C2 PLLi IaH.Ntt G @+•wtfSSua+ PLM APPL FE 100.00 Name of Office?, Committee or Commission decision being appealed)DI$IF`'' 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered:13lo 4 3.. The application or project was entitled: 134A fp-gz t J Nakaga s eggri as r ass • m 4 e n 4. 1 discussed the matter with the following City staff members ptJ Ltd1 t Ntl1r ?_ on mAl hoya _ Staff Member's Name and Department) Date) 5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so,when was it heard and by whom: V11 o SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what actionfs you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages,if necessary. This form continues on the other side. Pagel of 3 4;3 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Reason for Appeal continued This project is being appealed for two reasons: 1. The general plan policy1 infill development 1 1 the 1 1Luis • f• was riotgivenweightI 1 " consideration. 2. Tbere ispotential / improving nonconforming driveway whichwill provide additional for all residentsalong 1 ' access easementand bettersight distances and pedestrian protection Johnson Avenue. r,.s'r.TAZ y.,K'y•] '+ vim' T^ w-A'•••- v t? > rw d -Je.•+w '' F 'R"1' "" a-* s:. y;' i , e• s: 9.r. T p 1.r• 61 ab r F Gd'C{r L [ »::t 3 r-xi w t * a •3l S wEymr-r•'< ,, `~ z .•" u s y . .fit^i.h ", aq r 1n .J.3,^' Ma r mgr J SE ,g Y ,,c7 t t} o ;,s- "U Y Ck. ,.'f` r .' ryF_ 1 ¢ E:C.ar ltl2^i. 7M 13 yy%h-i -V i'aIF1ylcYtt• Tr Itd fF r q -r tp c r a J i 'rK r 2r- 4 *.+.-F•i`a v w+'a..... r i W 4r r7 df yP"-r '" t'iCy;y 1 w` r'"1K ye^ .. P 4_A.tig ` N.S I ,' e:WR..{+ lI• C.54. i'. e qnjJ,pfiaf^ te. Sti`_i{. 1' r F' 3t- f7nRq' F° e I Ir, ryyry7a.( y- J,Yµsta{ r"• a•''+. irx@ Ui, e_ K`_ yerry I"++ t. 4fi:. 3, rr- g'' uY t K` Gy,.+ n Alya. VyIi9' C`! 7'rpS1''^ iX. yr' r1, tu•t A` i[•!? F( pe,.R,r i,. W" 4 vI, µJv l„ riyrA+ f(^wr(W' 7rydst-jY' iII4tR Li. tm.' G" rii. Jwya` iia. d' ib' tasfS+.—, 1r1, f', f,. J'1r,s< 0r' 4'.. s+ i'lxd4rJsn Y{ LR' a. r1Gral-+} ia,cer`'..^ cvJ{$.+ dt 1. t r 4tCj4V11.,:+.t, n k.., F.. y, r,.C. Hlw vAS'r{ t r Y. tiCd> S='' lrEsu,A',+w,` t k!" t^ 1”. e> M5rt i. 4b.* 3'. j al, 8lsI a,' s ut YP•! zij wlpId.' rC) ZM.Yr Stam" "i..•.{.z, ii v}_ c }P +•SYr"S` .r-. I t ., r- E-r cr7.^ Y,Li d...k•.- iwAa" e_ •r .,;. ! ` 'iyawr at s. w:' G£ 3 1"F fcq h %v @rte° Cf f t{ PI r°, i Y + > k ir s,fP, ,r !' ., ..Ja - ,t 1, tc• 3- E m YyeG9S3Et< * t R r *c a a 4 iy eq cY"` 6,-1`(al i' f(sJ'"'a's"`'"'1..''.., r x r; .r•. , ry, '" y<r..u z` it ear t Y .F l.6er.*" •?'4+''j M .K In C ^, fSAq 4 1 [ 71 A ,c 1 t t Y•.t'L..cl'. Y ,.r4k'r•"EII( CLt+rr-.'>- a r- rlY! F qLq` FI a 2 r=Yi _m[i i t i f3C t UI LCrai 94, t}e paFel e H y B( rr i 4 S]t >L:.r„.ti+r M. t YS TF N G i- •r V i. r TY * t (ba. ftGq'£ '^ 'S SS, x p_'- z " s r °k .3GpM v t L 1 a ' cirri x'VmrwS` Pr fia'+e 5-.v,..X':' a l d'1°4^,Fa ryWyf:•iA,'' dS ` R'H,b 4 iMi- VT: f i.lri' l Orly v l es}1,5,U--°^IS(,er r'+.,,. a`f-'.1!f trfS i i ia',y^7-lr, s i i Sra j 1•,aY; 1 y d >•`,, `-h'.+"^ «Y } at-`: - -1 r . ir . y.,a " Ga,f,hor >c a = t.•s c Gc ,.rrlc 7'1 C- l~ 6, •r G +n iC f ! -.G" 7lia ..,„ . y 6 J@! J pt ar , `2 rc Sr ci E 1 ,f1 } a, F, c 7tf z a w/ c> "}F 1/' ,[ r.' t Fll G_ a r,f-'!it( t ( rte-- I. e + ., w% F r "a i'a J Cn.In7 i!p 1 'S'i *' L i, , } c3-. 4, • Ki ar ' ' n.r Jti.'• J ; i.Y" h 0 v c vd} y'' i t `t rr.{d ffid.Jr.., ya{, + fM 4N. 4$ rye h 1 i C^''gn•gt jy Ar` y^+ 5, J q 4.."^' d rIq„ {' i !•1' A.34 r yS y. x ti L. , y q e:• i .j. Y.r 7}-! ,y M, a`.'tq.,s',4's.' -?';,,t('C^+e` 1Kiawt Nc'^. C;t',,,, >t 3 3. - t c7sa-,, i o Yl'"7!''r I°J -JJ • fi/a•')t' e Cllr r/ 4{s-}era+ r N"`e r ++o la 1:i/ 1. •^.. 1 i,'r•° roa"'a:T a q y`^a y,• w .' + d. r EJ 5 JKT$-.M-(J"`>.741j¢ / "Ar_{GyA,s`3`4}-r(r a r. j.r,'_, rvii` ; .. W T fit. k . c rt r'a” 'pry M1M1.. y y.Ty}^-t '/• y/•`' f LL. J `.•lt/"' M1 0" jati $$ i L c k , p " Gi 9YY.:DY_>R r Tw.s1. w.+X.r'w.aY:_, 4 m+'R16:r 'm'4]I.krt 1 'W . fl` T"•£'. 1f J'"'`7 1C''a..!}t. f. T . t r .`' b} "I C'"k j ' rY }{. t• [ y t rS 1 e ...Z It1J l'. r' C(e 'y At t ii i e ^_ k ` C 1/xv. 'ra:,-. r s iir •• G l , • ti :IGI i ••1-1 a r: v Y ... C 7r ' r 1 1 -•1 .ri.erl w x °'1 1 0 s..• Y r' di t.ry r • 1 - v Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 7 RESOLUTION NO.####-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TO DENY THE VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT MS/ER 158-04 (SLO 04-0338) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 13 2006, to consider the applicant's request for a tentative parcel map to create two lots from an existing lot with exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance Section, Section 16. 18.060 flag lot requirements, for property located.at 1364 San Marcos Court; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the minor subdivision, based on findings; and WIFREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission's action was received by the City on September 21, 2006; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the appellant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff,presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1. Denial of Appeal. The request to appeal the Planning Commission's action denying the minor subdivision is hereby denied, based on the following findings: SECTION 1. Findings. 1. The site is not suited for the type and design of the subdivision due to the inability to create safe, logical site access. 2. The exception would allow approval of a minor subdivision that will result in improvements that will be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3. Granting the exception is not in accord with the intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations since the proposed access driveway does not meet required dimensions and required landscape buffering would not be possible. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Attachment 7 MS 158-04 Resolution to deny(9-13-06) Page 2 4. Approval of a subdivision with the proposed access through a non-conforming flag lot is not consistent with General Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies that are designed to protect existing neighborhoods. In particular, granting access for this new property out to Johnson Avenue is inconsistent with Land Use Element Policy 2.2.5 which states that new residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.MS 158-04 County Map No. SLO 04-0338) and requested exceptions are hereby denied. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2006. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jona Lowell, City Attorney G:\CD-PLAN\Pdunsmore\Subdivisions\MS 158-04(1364 San Marcos)\MS 158-04 CC deny reso.doc Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Filing Fee: $100 " 4 R E ved city Of N/A 21 0,4' REFER TOSECTION4 SLD CITYCLERK ;san lues OBISPO APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION rtrt e_ oUc=+I'c Reiss Name Mailing Address and Zip Code Phone Fax pilrldrew 1+slcrrla» q 334 Wa ver4rec 4 SLv FiW1 Representative's Name Mailing Address and Zip Code Gy"!Suill a -PWaHv ew- L9es) 9A 4 - 4011 Title Phone Fax SECTION2. SUBJECTOFAPPEAL 1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (copy attached), 1 hereby appeal the decision of the: . Iav1 b11+`1Q G.Ia toSS10 FLAN AFF rt a?i}:4 Name of office?, Committee or Commission decision being appealed) 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered:131 l0 3. The application or project was entitled: (3! Sarsg Marlrtee s C&*Fu y4 s E rt 158 • m sf Ta l s i e M+r 4. 1 discussed the matter with the following City staff member: heElaII Q 1451MGlye on 41&1 Joe. StaffVember's Name and Department) bate) 5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so, when was it heard and by whom: to A SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what action/s you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages, if necessary. This form continues on the other side. Page 1 of 3 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Reason for Appeal continued This project is being appealed for two reasons: 1. The general plan policy of infill development within the City of San Luis Obispo was not given full weight in the consideration. 2. There is potential of improving a non conforming driveway which will provide additional safety for all residents along the access easement and better sight distances and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue. SECTION 4. APPELLANTS RESPONSIBILITY The San Luis Obispo City Council values public participation in local government and encourages all forms of citizen involvement. However, due to real costs associated with City Council consideration of an appeal, including public notification, all appeals pertaining to a planning application or project are subject to a filing fee of$100.* Your right to exercise an appeal comes with certain responsibilities. If you file an appeal, please understand that it must be heard within 45 days from filing this form. You will be notified in writing of the exact date your appeal will be heard before the Council. You or your representative will be expected to attend,the public hearing, and to be prepared to make your case. Your testimony is limited to 10 minutes. A continuance may be granted under certain and unusual circumstances. If you feel you need to request a continuance, you must submit your request in writing to the City Clerk. Please be advised that if your request for continuance is received after the appeal is noticed to the public, the . Council may not be able to grant the request for continuance. Submitting a request for continuance does not guarantee that it will be granted;that action is at the discretion of the City Council hereby agree to appear and/or send a representative to appear an my behalf when' said appeal is " F fuleedd fora ublic hearing before the City Council. vG Si ature f Appellant) DA) Exceptions tot a fee: 1)Appeals of Tree Committee decisions. 2)The above-named appellant has already paid _ the City$100 to appeal this same matter to a City official or Council advisory body. This item is hereby calendared for A Ad yz!>-7 r3 Ems'- /y 266 Z c:City Attorney p J _ ppleC W L City Administrative Officer Department Head - Advisory Body Chairperson - A mi c ER City Clerk(original) AWIZL IJ Page 2 of 3 af03 AL'v,9 t oee- STu s 2 e/1 Se-c- 9/aa Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 IIIIIhh IIIIIIfIIVIIIIuIIIIII III llll IIIII III IIIII U IIIIIII II cityo san u s oB SPO 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 RECEIVED September 22, 2006 CEP 2 8 1106 SLO CITY CLERK Jerry Reiss 820 Walnut Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 RE: PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP; 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT,Ms/ER 1M-04. Dear Mr. Reiss: In reference to your appeal being heard by the City Council, City code requires an appeal to be set for the next reasonably available council meeting, but in no event later than forty-five calendar days after the date of the filing of such notice of appeal with the City Clerk. Although you have agreed by phone to permit us to schedule your appeal after the 45 day deadline (i.e. November 5, 2006), we require a signed acknowledgement. Therefore,?lease sign and return this letter to the City Clerk's Office no later than October 2' . An envelope has been enclosed for your convenience. r r--7 Jerry " s Sincerely, Audre ooper City Clerk The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Page 1 of 1 Audrey Hooper - File 158-04 From: "Gary Corsiglia" < RECEIVED To: Phil Dunsmore" <PDunsmor@slocity.org>NOV i 3 2006 Date:11/9/2006 9:24 PM Subject: File 158-04 SLO CITY CLERK Subject: File 158-04 November 9, 2006 Dear City Council members, My wife and I reside at 2707 Johnson Ave.which backs up to the present single family lot and would share a lot line with the new parcel being proposed. As we understand the proposal,the new second lot would be accessed by the driveway presently serving four houses with addresses 2675, 2677, 2679 and 2685 Johnson Ave. That present driveway is very narrow, only one lane wide in some areas due to the houses,trees and bushes.The additional traffic on the narrow drive will impact the residents of the four houses, but that is not our concern. Our concern is for the fire safety of a new house built on the proposed new lot and by location the fire safety of our home. If the new house were to have a fire,the timely access by the fire department to the property would be restricted by the narrow driveway. As the time to fight the fire is delayed, it could spread to the adjacent properties including our. home. Because of this concern we would ask the City Council to deny this request to split the lot into two parcels. This proposal was wisely denied by the Planning Commission at their September 13, 2006, meeting.The Planning Commission Staff recommendation was to deny this request.There have been no changes made in the proposal to address any of the concerns of the Planning Commission, their Staff or the adjacent property owners. Please deny this request again. Sincerely, Gary and Brigit Corsiglia CAOLINCI 21CD0 DIR MACAO O'FIN DIR FIRE CHIEF 2707 Johnson Ave. ZrATTORNEY ,0'PW DIR ZrCLERK/ORIG .e POLICE CHF San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 DEPT HEADS TZREC DIR Q`i UTIL DIR 2/HR DIR RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DATEIII-q& ITEM # file://C:\Documents and Settings\slouser\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 11/13/2006 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 EXHIBIT 4 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 __________________________________________ P.O. Box 1446, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 San Luis Obispo: 805.544.8100 Facsimile: 805.544.4381 Email: neil@tardifflaw.com August 20, 2024 Via Certified US Mail Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct. San Luis Obispo Ca. 93401 RE: Assignment of 2003 Grant of Easement in Gross Dear Mr. Hatalsky: Our office has been retained to represent Mr. and Mrs. Robert Cooper whom reside next door to your San Marcos Ct. property. Apparently, a surveyor was on the Cooper Property taking measurements and the Coopers were told you plan on building something on the Easement in gross given to Mr. and Mrs. Reiss back in 2003 which was assigned to you by Mrs. Collette Reiss in 2021. It is our opinion that the Assignment gave you no rights to any easement appurtenant over the Coopers’ Property for essentially three reasons: 1) the easement in gross was conditioned on Mr. and/or Mrs. Reiss acquiring ownership of your property which never occurred and therefore there is no easement appurtenant; 2) the reason the Reiss’s wanted the easement was to be able to build a home on the property but you would not agree so they did not pursue it any further; and 3) the easement in gross was given in 2003 and was abandoned by prescription by at least 2008. With all that said, on behalf of my clients, we are demanding that you cease and desist from entering onto the Cooper Property for the purpose of attempting to utilize an unenforceable easement. Otherwise, we will have to seek all available legal remedies against you. Neil S. Tardiff* *Certified Appellate Specialist by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization TARDIFF LAW OFFICES A Law Corporation Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 TARDIFF LAW OFFICES America’s Best Cultivators, LLC Page 2 of 2 __________________________________________ P.O. Box 1446, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 San Luis Obispo: 805.544.8100 Facsimile: 805.544.4381 Email: neil@tardifflaw.com Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. If you would like to discuss this with me, you may contact me anytime. Sincerely, Tardiff Law Offices Neil S. Tardiff Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 EXHIBIT 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 Docusign Envelope ID: 44342D4C-2973-8F2D-8226-6AEE1357EC11 19 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Thursday, April 2, 2026 9:05 AM To:bob cooper Subject:RE: Please send a new link for this file Attachments:11_14_2006, PH 4 - APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION TO DENY A MINOR SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO LOTS FROM ONE L.pdf Hi Bob, Sorry about the issues getting to the file. I went ahead and just downloaded the PDF and attached it here. Hope that helps – let me know if you still have any issues accessing it. Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: bob cooper < Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 7:42 AM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: Please send a new link for this file Hi Gabriel, it was great meeting you the other day! The link that you sent will not open. Could you please try sending another link. Thank You Robert Cooper Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone council M°°- Iq IDLA j acEnaa Report I=N C I T Y OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Philip Dunsmore, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION TO DENY A MINOR SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO LOTS FROM ONE LOT AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT. (MS 158-04) CAO RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution, denying the appeal, and upholding the Planning Commission's action to deny the subdivision, based on findings. DISCUSSION Background The applicant/appellant, Jerry Reiss, would like to subdivide the existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court, creating a new vacant lot that would share an existing flag lot driveway access with three other properties at 2675 though 2685 Johnson Avenue. The proposed map includes three exceptions to the flag lot standards, MC 16.18.060 of the Subdivision Regulations: accessway width, accessway landscape setbacks, and ownership of the accessway. The ownership situation surrounding the proposed subdivision is somewhat convoluted since the appellant, Jerry Reiss, no longer owns the property which he is trying to subdivide. Instead, the property is currently owned by Paul and Julie Hatalsky. The Hatalskys previously purchased the subject property from Jerry Reiss subject to an agreement that Mr. Reiss could later subdivide the rear half of the property for his own interest. Prior to selling the property to the Hatalskys, Mr. Reiss also secured an access easement from a property owner at 2685 Johnson Avenue. 2685 Johnson Avenue is the back lot on an existing flag-lot subdivision that has a total of four houses on it (see Attachment 1). The property owner that originally sold Mr. Reiss the easement has since sold the property to Robert Cooper. Mr. Cooper testified at the Planning Commission hearing that he is not in support of the proposed subdivision and does not support the use of the easement. The history of the ownership, and the easement, however, does not affect the applicability of the Subdivision Regulations, or the City's ability to act on the request. Subdivision Exceptions The Subdivision Regulations implement specific standards that are designed to protect existing neighborhoods while implementing the General Plan and Subdivision Map Act. Mr. Reiss' proposed subdivision map requests the following exceptions to these regulations: y- Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 2 1. Access-way Modifications The existing (and proposed) accessway is 19 feet wide and the minimum width required is 20 feet MC 16.18.060 C, below). Although a 1-foot difference is not significant, the available area to improve the accessway with a new driveway is hampered by utilities, trees and other improvements that encroach into the accessway..Additionally, the existing residence at Johnson Avenue is right at the edge of the accessway with no setback. The minimum driveway width for this subdivision should be 16 feet while the existing driveway is approximately 10 feet wide. MC 16.18.060 C. The accessway (access lot, not driveway width) to the rear shall be at least twenty feet (20') wide for residential and conservation open space zones and 40 feet wide for commercial zones (except the C-D zone which is 15 feet). Driveway width and paving shall be determined by the City parking and driveway standards and is subject to approval of the Community Development Department Director based on use, distance, number of parking spaces and/or units served. 2. Access-way Landscape Setbacks The Subdivision Regulations require that a minimum of eight feet be reserved between the access driveway and existing residential structures (MC 16.18.060 E, below) Presently, the access driveway is about 1-foot from an existing residence and there is a narrow landscape planter approximately 5 to 6 feet in width) along one side of the driveway. Widening the driveway to allow two-way vehicle access or fire truck access is likely to completely eliminate the existing landscape buffer. MC 16.18.060 E. Each lot shall have yards as required by the Zoning Regulations. A landscape area with sufficient width to plant screening shrubs and trees (minimum of eight feet) shall be reserved between the access driveway (and any required turn- around areas)and existing or proposed residential structures. 3. Ownership of Access-way The access-way is currently a part of the rearmost lot (2685 Johnson Avenue). With the proposed subdivision, the rearmost lot would be the Reiss parcel; however Reiss would not own the accessway. Instead he would utilize an easement over it. MC 16.18.060 H requires that the lot furthest from the street own the accessway in fee. Planning Commission Action Based on neighborhood testimony and staff description of insufficient site access, the Planning Commission unanimously denied the subdivision request at a hearing on September 13, 2006 Attachments 3, 4, and 5 Planning Commission minutes, resolution and staff report). Neighbors that share the existing accessway on Johnson Avenue expressed concerns about the loss of landscape and privacy due to the proposed widening of the driveway. Other concerns include increased vehicle trips onto Johnson Avenue and excessive trash and recycling bins at the narrow driveway frontage at Johnson Avenue. Commissioners noted that they would support the map if alternative access to San Marcos or Augusta Avenue could be achieved. The basis for denial is especially ya Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 3 related to the unique access request within an existing flag lot easement that currently serves three other residences from Johnson Avenue. The existing access is too narrow to allow for safe vehicular access or fire truck access and the addition of another lot on this accessway only exacerbates the problem. Appeal An appeal was received from the applicant, Jerry Reiss on September 21, 2006. Mr. Reiss is appealing the Planning Commissions action and believes that he has provided a sufficient access plan for the proposed lot. Specifically, Mr. Reiss' appeal provides two reasons to justify the appeal. Each of Mr. Reiss' appeal points, in italics below, is followed by an evaluation of the particular point. 1. The General Plan Policy of infill development within the City of San Luis Obispo was not given full weight in the consideration. Attachment 3 includes the Planning Commission staff report. The Planning commission was presented with a complete General Plan analysis including a detailed project description. Infill development is supported when the development is compatible with the existing neighborhood and when it does not create significant health, safety or welfare issues. In fact, at the Planning Commission hearing, Commissioners stated that they would support the map if the applicant could find reasonable access to either Augusta Street or San Marcos Court. The proposed access route to Johnson Avenue was the PC's concern that tipped the scale between logical infill and an infeasible request that will negatively impact the neighborhood while supplying only one building site. In regards to GP policies regarding infill development, there are none which speak directly to the circumstances of this appeal. The most relevant reference to infill development is a program in the Housing Element that addresses infill. Program 6.3.9 reads: Balance City efforts to encourage residential development by focusing as much on infill development and densification within the City Limits as on annexation of new residential land." However, there are many General Plan Housing and Land Use Element policies that are also designed to protect residential neighborhoods. For example, Policy 3.2.6 of the Housing Element: Preserve the fabric, amenities, yards, (i.e. setbacks) and overall character and quality of life of established neighborhoods" C' Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 4 2. There is potential of improving a non-conforming driveway which will provide additional safety for all residents along the access easement and better sight distances and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue. Although the plan does indicate widening and improving the existing driveway, sight distance and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue would be unchanged unless parking from Johnson Avenue is elimindated and significant trees and other vegetation are removed from the easement area. Rather than improve the situation, widening of the driveway would eliminate privacy and shade while decreasing the aesthetic appearance of yards that abut the access driveway. The positive benefits of widening the driveway are overshadowed by the negative impacts that would burden at least six existing dwellings (three dwellings on the access driveway and three others on adjacent properties that abut the driveway). Conclusion Encouraging the expanded use of the existing access driveway out to Johnson Avenue is not consistent with the intent of the Subdivision Regulations or the applicable General Plan Policies. The Flag Lot Standards in the Subdivision Regulations (MC 16.18. 060) are designed to implement General Plan Policies in regards to protecting existing yards, properties and neighborhoods. These standards require significant landscape buffers, and other design standards that are intended to screen backyards and residential bedrooms from vehicular driveways. The proposed plan conflicts with these important standards and would eliminate existing screening. As noted earlier, the map might be supported by the Planning Commission if alternative access plans to Augusta Street were to be achieved. CONCURRENCES The Public Works Department (Transportation Division)and the Fire Department have reviewed the site and have commented on the proposed access plan. The Fire Department would require fire truck access on the driveway and a turn around area. The Transportation Division agreed that the existing access-way is not appropriate to accommodate an additional dwelling and that widening and tree removals would have to occur to increase access sight distance. FISCAL IMPACT When the General Plan was prepared, it was accompanied by a fiscal impact analysis, which found that overall the General Plan was fiscally balanced. Accordingly, since the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, it has a neutral fiscal impact. ALTERNATIVES 1. Uphold the appeal, thereby approving the minor subdivision to allow a new lot behind the existing residence at 1364 San Marcos Court. Upholding the appeal would require staff to prepare an environmental analysis with the need to return to Council to review and adopt the L/-y l Council Agenda Report—Appeal of Planning Commission action denying a minor subdivision for 1364 San Marcos Page 5 environmental document and a revised resolution. The recommended action does not include an environmental analysis since the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not require such an analysis when the project is to be denied. If the Council wishes to approve the appeal it may also want to add specific subdivision_ and access driveway conditions when the item returns to Council. 2. Continue the item for additional analysis or research, Council should specify the information needed and to provide staff with specific direction in order to return to a hearing at a later date. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Vicinity Map Attachment 2: Reduced scale site plan and project details Attachment 3: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Attachment 4: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission Resolution Attachment 5: September 13, 2006 Planning Commission staff report Attachment 6: Appeal to City Council Attachment 7: Draft Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission action to deny the minor subdivision. G:\CD-PLAN\Pdunsmore\Subdivisions\MS 158-04(1364 San Marcos)\AP CC158-04 11-14-06.doc y- 6A VICINITY MAP iFile No. 151 1364 San Marcos Ct . AttachmenI. 2 San Luis Obispo City Planning Department 990 Palm Street P.O. Box 8100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403-8100 Re: Minor Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I have made application to subdivide the property located at 1364 San Marcos Court into two parcels. The newly created vacant.parcel will be approximately 9,400 s.f. in size and be accessed from Johnson Avenue by way of an existing driveway and easement. The remaining parcel at 1364 San Marcos Court will revert back to the original.configuration, as subdivided in 1971. The two parcels were combined in the mid 1980's. City Planning has notified me that two items may be of concern and need to be addressed: easement width and lot location. The following discussion addresses each of these concerns. 1. EASEMENT WIDTH: The existing driveway easement is nineteen feet wide in lieu of the now required twenty foot width. The easement has been in constant use by three parcels for approximately fifteen or more years. The rear parcel owns the land upon which the easement exists. 2. LOT LOCATION: City regulations require the lot which is farthest away from the street to own the land underlying the driveway easement. The rear property line of the proposed new lot extends twenty-five feet farther back than the easement lot. However, both lots were originally equidistant from Johnson Avenue until a lot line adjustment was allowed, which moved the easement lot rear property line twenty-five feet closer to the street. Additionally, access to the garage on the easement lot extends.beyond the end of the driveway easement held by the new lot. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AIIG e,$ 29 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a-7 Attachment 2 Please do not hesitate to contact me, if you have further questions or need further clarification. ZBest gards, er Reiss San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 y- U n pql J ma$ a aN4 alb n d m aea kr ash U o 12: RaI L Lg s AV NOSNHOr W g sx gal I I I i I I h 1H I F I I m' I I h a a 9 e afd' In C11CCR c wee lel 7° 4N OG I yll - achment 2 g €€ 3 1OK6 VO'odslgp sin-1 ueg'any uosugor 6L9Z R n v o uolslMpquS sslaa N, gsuawanojduq ReMeApa posodoid S o W ow pp tO d 2:) Z O o y J I WU a 1 I m I W a I 1 g g I U J W U K J Attachment 3 SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 13, 2006 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Commissioners Charles Stevenson, John Ashbaugh, Andrew Carter, Jason McCoy, Peter Brown, Vice-Chair Carlyn Christianson, and Chairperson Andrea Miller Absent: Commissioners Carlyn Christianson Staff: Deputy Director Doug Davidson, Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore, Assistant City Attorney Christine Dietrick, and Recording Secretary Jill Francis ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Commissioners or staff may modify the order of items. MINUTES: Minutes of August 23, 2006. Approve or amend. The minutes of August 23, 2006, were approved as amended. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 1364 San Marcos Court MS and ER 158-04: Consideration of a tentative parcel map creating two lots from one lot, and environmental review; R-1 zone, Jerry Reiss, applicant. (Phil Dunsmore) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending the Commission deny the proposed vesting tentative parcel map based on findings which he explained. Andrew Merriam, Wallace Group, representative for the applicant, spoke in support of the request, explained how the driveway would be widened to improve conditions, and described how there were no other access opportunities Jerry Reiss, property owner, was available for questions. PUBLIC COMMENTS: A letter was presented to the Commission from a neighbor opposing the project. Rolf Monteen, SLO, spoke against the project, explained the impact of the project to his property, was concerned about the loss of trees and vegetation; felt the driveway would Planning Commission Minui._ Attachment 3September13, 2006 Page 2 be better served going to Augusta Street, and presented photos to show the size of the current driveway. Eric McSwain, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the project, expressed concerns with increased traffic on Johnson Avenue and the extended driveway. Scott Moran, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project, discussed the driveway dimensions and presented photos, and expressed safety concerns with vehicles exiting onto Johnson Avenue. Ed Mayo, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the increased density, and opposed the project.. Chris Burtness, San Luis Obispo, spoke against the project and voiced concerns with the easement created in 2003 which his family was unaware of. George Shamis, San Luis Obispo, opposed the project and noted concerns with changes occurring in the neighborhood. Mark Ekhert, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with noise and increased density, noting his opposition to the project. Robert Cooper, San Luis Obispo, owner of the current driveway that would need to be widened, spoke against the project and did not support the easement. Craig Adams, San Luis Obispo, had concerns with traffic and density, and expressed opposition to the request. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission discussed the history of the proposed lot, the access, and complexities of the ownership and easement issues. They encouraged the applicant to seek alternative access to another street other than Johnson Avenue. Commr. Stevenson discussed the proposed driveway and possible widening, as well as loss of vegetation. Commr. Ashbaugh asked staff about other possibilities for the parcel if this project is denied. Commr. McCoy asked where the original access for parcel was located. He noted he could not support the project because of neighborhood concerns with fire and traffic safety, and another dwelling unit. Commr. Carter asked about the original access to the lot. Planning Commission Minu,_,'3 Attachment 3 September 13,2006 Page 3 Commr. Miller discussed possible avenues for the owner with the denial of this project. On motion by Commr. Carter to deny the proposed tentative parcel map. Seconded by Commr. Ashbaugh. AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Stevenson, Brown, McCoy, Carter, Miller NOES: None ABSENT: Commr. Christianson RECUSED: None The motion carried on a 6 :0 vote. 2. 1772 Calle Joaquin.U 123-05; Request to construct a wireless telecommunications facility camouflaged by two 31- foot tall faux trees; C/OS-10 zone; Cingular Wireless, applicant. (Tyler Corey) Associate Planner Phil Dunsmore presented the staff report, recommending approval of the use permit, based on findings and subject to conditions. Jeff Jacobsen, Infranext, applicant's representative, described the simulated trees and clarified the location of the facilities. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION.COMMENTS: Commr. Stevenson spoke in favor of the project with protection of existing trees and vegetation. On a motion by Commr. Brown to approve the use permit, based on findings and subiect-to conditions. Seconded by Commr. McCoy. AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Brown, Miller, McCoy, Stevenson NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Carter ABSENT: Commr. Christianson The motion carried on a vote of 5: 0. 3. 1908 Ruth Street. MS and ER 109-06; Consideration of a tentative parcel map creating two parcels (3,085 sq. ft. and 4,389 sq. ft. ) from one lot, with exceptions to Y1 r Attachment 4 RESOLUTION NO. 5462-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING THE VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR A MINOR SUBDMSION LOCATED AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT MS/ER 158-04 (SLO 04-0338) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 13, 2006, to consider the applicant's request for a tentative parcel map to create two lots from an existing lot with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance Section, Section 16.18.060 flag lot requirements, for property located at 1364 San Marcos Court; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo has considered testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and evaluation and recommendations by staff; and BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. 1. The site is not suited for the type and design of the subdivision due to the inability to create safe, logical site access. 2. The exception would allow approval of a minor subdivision that will result in improvements that will be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3.Granting the exception is not in accord with the intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations since the proposed access driveway does not meet required dimensions and required landscape buffering would not be possible. 4. Approval of a subdivision with the proposed access through a non-conforming flag lot is- not snotconsistentwithGeneralPlanLandUseandHousingElementpoliciesthataredesigned to protect existing neighborhoods. In particular; granting access for this new property out to Johnson Avenue is inconsistent with Land Use Element Policy 2.2.5 which states that new residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. MS 158-04 (County Map No. SLO 04-0338) and requested exceptions are hereby denied. qzl MS 158-04 Resolution to dei '7'13 Attachment 4 Page 2 On motion by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Carter, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Commrs. Ashbaugh, Brown, Miller, Carter, McCoy and Stevenson NOES: None REFRAIN: None ABSENT: Commr. Christianson The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of September, 2006. Doug Da ' son, Secretary Planning Commission L S Attachment 5 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PLANNING COMM SSSION AGENDA REPORT ITEM# 1 BY: Philip Dunmore`,`Associate Planner(781-7522) MEETING DATE: September 13, 2006 Pf FROM: Pamela Ricci,, Senior Planner FILE NUMBER: MS/ER 158-04 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1364 San Marcos Court SUBJECT: Review of a proposed vesting tentative parcel map with exceptions to the flag lot standards contained in the Subdivision Regulations to create two lots from one existing lot at the end of San Marcos Court located between Augusta Street and Johnson Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to deny the proposed vesting tentative parcel map based on findings. BACKGROUND Situation The applicant would like to subdivide the existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court, creating a new vacant lot that would share an existing flag lot driveway access with three other properties at 2675 though 2685 Johnson Avenue. The proposed map includes exceptions to the flag lot standards, MC 16.18.060 of the Subdivision Regulations. The exceptions include reduced accessway width, reduced accessway landscape setbacks, and the lot furthest from the street would not own the accessway in fee. Data Summary Address: 1364 San Marcos Court Applicant: Jerry Reiss Property Owner: Paul and Julie Hatalsky Representative: Andrew Merriam Zoning: R-1 (Low:Density Residential) General Plan: Low-Density Residential Environmental Status: An initial study of environmental review has not been prepared for the project since CEQA does not require one for projects that are to be disapproved. Site Description The lot is on the north side of the cul-de-sac street known as San Marcos Court. San Marcos Court intersects with Augusta Street near Sinsheimer Park. The lot is approximately 14,617 Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 2 square feet in area and contains an existing residence near the street. The rear of the parcel is vacant and does not contain significant landscape or vegetation with the exception of one large eucalyptus tree. The rear of the site abuts an existing flag lot accessway that contains a driveway serving three parcels from Johnson Avenue. The three parcels on Johnson Avenue are each independently owned and contain a total of four residences. The front lot, 2675 Johnson, contains a secondary dwelling unit that accesses the flag lot driveway. 2679 and 2685 each contain a single-family residence and each of these properties utilizes the flag lot driveway. Proiect Description The project includes splitting the existing lot into two parcels. Parcel 1 would be the vacant parcel, 7,969 square feet in area, at the rear of the site adjacent to the flag lot accessway from Johnson Avenue. Parcel 1 would be 6,648 square feet in area and encompass the existing residence at 1364 San Marcos. In order to improve visibility and access, the applicant would improve the existing driveway from Johnson Avenue by widening and clearing back vegetation. In addition, the City Fire Department would require that a fire truck tum-around be provided on the new lot, prior to construction of a new residence. A recorded easement exists that allows for access to the San Marcos Court property through the existing flag lot driveway from Johnson Avenue. Although 1364 San Marcos previously contained two parcels in the same configuration as this subdivision request, the City Engineer is requiring that a new map be prepared to formalize the lots rather than a certificate of compliance since there is not sufficient record to verify the legality of the lots. EVALUATION The proposed vesting tentative parcel map will result in two conforming lots in terms of their overall areas and dimensions. However, the proposal to establish and improve access to a new lot from an existing non-conforming flag lot subdivision is a major concern given the range of necessary exception requests it requires, the potential•impacts to adjacent residents, and the. serious traffic and safety issues that are intensified. Due to the proposed access and the numerous conflicts it creates with General Plan Policy and the Subdivision Regulations, staff cannot support the subdivision proposal. If there were options to access this property, such as through the existing residence at San Marcos, or through an existing flag lot subdivision at Augusta Street, many of the significant concerns might be overcome. The following portions of the evaluation section discuss the project's lack of consistency with the General Plan and Subdivision Regulations in greater detail. 1. General Plan The following paragraphs evaluate the proposed project for consistency with applicable General Plan Policies. General Plan Policy is in italics followed by staff's response. 7 L._A Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 3 Land Use Element LU 2.2.5 Street Access New residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and medium-or high density housing to driveways accessible from collector streets. Major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. Staffs Analysis: Johnson Avenue operates as an arterial street, with high traffic volumes and relatively high traffic speeds. Increasing the residential density on an existing non-conforming access driveway that intersects with Johnson Avenue is likely to create more intensive traffic and safety issues. The existing driveway is non-conforming since it is too narrow to accommodate two-way traffic (approximately 10 to 12 feet wide), and the existing residences and property lines are too close to the driveway to allow the driveway to be improved to an acceptable standard. If a vehicle is pulling out of the driveway when a vehicle wants to enter the driveway, traffic conflicts could occur on Johnson Avenue. City staff has visited the site with Public Works transportation staff, who recommends that if the subdivision were to be approved, that an alternative driveway access plan be mandated. The applicant has explored alternative access arrangements, including a driveway out to Augusta Street through another existing flag lot subdivision; however, such an arrangement has not been secured. Achieving access to San Marcos Court, through the front of the property, would seem to be the most logical solution to the problem. However, in order to achieve access to San Marcos, the existing residence would have to be modified, An additional complication to this subdivision request is that the applicant does not own the underlying property or residence on San Marcos. Instead this subdivision request is based upon a recorded agreement with the current property owner. The agreement allows the former property owner (Jerry Reiss, applicant) to subdivide the rear half of the property for his own interest. The agreement expires at the end of 2006. The agreement was recorded when Jerry Reiss sold the property to the current owner.. LU 2.2.12:Residential Project Objectives Residential projects should provide: A)Privacy,for occupants and neighbors of the project, E)Security and safety; F)Separate paths for vehicles and for people, and bike paths along collector streets; G)Adequate parking and storage space; I) Design elements that facilitate neighborhood interaction, such as front porches, front yards along streets, and entryways facing public walkways. Staffs Analysis: The site's flag lot configuration, shared driveway and limited access space makes it more difficult to design a project that easily complies with many of the objectives contained in General Plan Policy LU 2.2.12. The project's consistency with each objective is evaluated in the following paragraphs: Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 4 A) Developing a residence at this site will reduce privacy for neighbors of the project since existing landscape buffers at the edge of the driveway near private backyards would have to be removed to accommodate some widening of the driveway. E) Safety would be compromised by additional vehicle trips on an existing narrow driveway that intersects a busy arterial roadway. Even with required improvements, fire access and tum-around capabilities are likely to be marginal. F) There-is not enough room in the driveway to create separate paths for bikes or pedestrians. This exacerbates existing conditions since Johnson Avenue is not especially friendly for pedestrians and bicyclists given traffic volumes and rates of speed. G) Due to limited street frontage, parking demand issues within flag lot subdivisions are common. The new subdivision regulations .require that each of the lots within a flag lot subdivision provide one additional parking space than required by code. In this case, a new lot would be attached to an existing, developed flag lot subdivision; therefore, it would not be possible to place additional parking on separately owned, developed lots. However, the proposed lot, would be required to provide a total of three parking spaces plus space for a fire-truck turn- around. All of these improvements would severely compromise the lot's available building envelope. 1) The deep lot configuration, narrow driveway, and remote location of the lot in relation to the street would not allow for traditional design elements mentioned in I. Housing Element HE 3.2.6 Preserve the fabric, amenities, yards (i.e. setbacks), and overall character and quality of life of established neighborhoods. Staffs Analysis: Due to the required improvements to the existing access driveway to achieve fire access and some widening, the existing yards and quality of the setting would be compromised. The existing driveway is only 10 to 12 feet wide and bordered on one side by a heavy landscape screen and on the other side by existing residences (one residence is as close as 1-foot away from the existing driveway. The plans propose to widen the driveway to approximately fourteen feet with a couple of vehicle turn-outs that would be eighteen feet wide. The widening would result in the removal of important landscape screening that currently helps to buffer the driveway from adjacent rear yards of residences at 2699 and 2695 Johnson Avenue. The driveway improvements and the addition of a new residence at this location would not be consistent with Housing Element Policy 3.2.6. HE 7.2.1 Within established neighborhoods, new residential development shall be of a character, size, density and quality that preserves the neighborhood character and maintains the quality of life for existing and future residents. Staffs Analysis: The issue at stake is the quality of life for existing and future residents. The new lot and potential new residence will impact the quality of life for existing and future residents if the lot's access is taken through the existing flag-lot driveway out to Johnson Avenue. Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 5 HE 7.2.6 Housing shall be sited to enhance safety along neighborhood streets... Staffs Analysis: As noted above in the Land Use Element discussion, the proposed access route through an existing non-conforming flag lot subdivision would compromise the safety of existing and future residents. 2.Subdivision Regulations The minor subdivision will be subject to processing under the City's flag lot standards of the Subdivision Regulations (MC 16.18.060, Attachment 5). Flag lots must be designed to conform to specific standards that are designed to minimize impacts to existing adjacent properties. In this case, the proposal will not create a new flag lot, but instead it will utilize an existing flag lot driveway to achieve access. Because of the age and intensity of existing development, necessary improvements to create logical access and buffering for existing properties would be difficult to achieve. The following discussion highlights the proposed project's consistency with applicable code requirements. The pertinent sections of the Subdivision Regulations are summarized in italics followed by staffs analysis. MC 1618.060 B. The original lot shall have frontage on a dedicated street of at least the minimum dimensions required by these regulations (20 feet). Staffs Analysis: The existing frontage for the rear parcel of the existing flag lot (2685 Johnson) is approximately 19 feet wide, which does not conform to current standards. No changes are proposed, or are possible to the frontage of the lot. The new lot (Parcel 1) would not have frontage on Johnson Avenue and would utilize an existing easement over a non-conforming flag- lot driveway to achieve access: MC 16.18.060 C. The access-way to the rear shall be at least 20 feet wide. Driveway width and paving shall be determined by the City parking and driveway standards and is subject to approval of the Community Development Director. Staffs Analysis: The existing flag-lot is approximately 19 feet wide; however the paved area of the existing driveway within the accessway lot is only about 10 to 12 feet wide. The Parking and Driveway Standards would require a driveway of this type to be a minimum of 16 feet wide to accommodate two-way traffic. Additionally, the Fire Department has requested that the driveway exceed this minimum standard and be improved to a 20-foot width with at least 13', 6" of vertical clearance. With existing conditions; widening the driveway beyond 14 feet would cause the removal of significant trees and other screening landscape, significantly impacting the existing residential properties adjacent to the driveway. Currently there are residences and other improvements that are within one or two feet of the existing driveway. Even if the driveway were widened to the greatest extent possible, given the physical constraints, it would not conform to required standards and would not allow sufficient width to allow two vehicles traveling in separate directions to pass each other. Attach mant 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 6 MC 16.18.060 E. Each lot shall have yards as required by Zoning Regulations. A landscape area with sufficient width to plant screening shrubs and trees (minimum of eight feet) shall be reserved between the access driveway (and any required turn-around areas) and existing or proposed residential structures. Staffs Analysis: Beyond potential traffic and safety impacts to Johnson Avenue, insufficient buffering between the driveway and existing properties is the most significant issue involved with this subdivision proposal. This code requirement was designed to implement General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.2.12 to ensure that existing residential yards and bedrooms would not be impacted by vehicles entering or exiting driveways. As mentioned above, the existing shrubs, trees and other improvements would have to be removed in order to improve the driveway for fire and vehicle access. Since minimum driveway width standards cannot be achieved, there is obviously no additional space to provide for the landscape setbacks required by MC 16.18.060 E. The proposal would leave landscape areas that range from 4 feet to 2 feet in width on one side and less than one foot on the other side. Landscape buffering for existing properties to the south would be impacted. The creation of one lot does not warrant the potential loss in privacy and quality of life for existing properties.. MC 16.18.060 F. For each residence served by a flag lot driveway, one additional off street parking space shall be provided. The parking space may not be within the street yard or in tandem to other required parking spaces. Staffs Analysis: The proposed lot would have to supply a total of three parking spaces in addition to a fire-truck tum-around, severely compromising the available building footprint. It would not be possible to require additional parking spaces for the existing developed lots taking access from the flag lot driveway since they are under separate ownership and are not part of this subdivision application request. Therefore, the parking requirement must be considered another exception sought by the applicant. The Commission.should also note, that street parking is very limited on Johnson Avenue, at least in part because of the concentration of flag-lot subdivisions in the vicinity. The proposed driveway improvements resulting from this map are likely to remove additional street parking spaces. MC 16.18.060 H. The lot farthest from the street shall own the accessway in fee. Other lots using the accessway shall have an access easement over it. Staffs Analysis: In this case, the proposed lot at the rear of 1364 San Marcos would be the lot furthest from Johnson Avenue, however the accessway is already owned in fee by 2685 Johnson Avenue. This map is asking for an exception to MC 16.18.060 H. Currently the property at 1364 San Marcos has an easement for access and maintenance over the existing accessway for 2685 Johnson. It is this particular easement that the applicant is relying upon for future access to the new lot. Attachment 5 MS 158-04 (1364 San Marcos Court) Page 7 3. Property Development Standards No plans have been formalized to develop the proposed lot at this time, therefore it is not possible to evaluate specific development standards. The lot would have to include a 40-foot deep fire truck turn-around per City standard. Trash collection, site drainage and a reasonable building envelope are all potential issues. The site appears large enough to be able to accommodate an adequate building envelope even with the requited fire truck tum-around and compliance with other property development standards. As with any flag lot subdivision, trash collection would be problematic. A total of five residences would have to utilize the property frontage at 2675 Johnson Avenue on trash day. Typically, R-1 properties utilize,separate trash, greenwaste and recycling bins for a total of three separate bins per residence and a total of 15 bins possible on trash day. Given the limited sight distance and driveway access issues at Johnson Avenue, a large amount of trash bins in front of one residence would exacerbate existing conditions. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution denying the minor subdivision with exceptions. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue the item. An action to continue the item should include a detailed list of additional information or project modifications required. 2. Approve the map based on findings and subject to conditions. Staff would need to prepare the required environmental document and return to the Commission with a complete set findings, conditions, mitigation measures, and code requirements at a later date. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Vicinity map Attachment 2: Reduced scale project plans Attachment 3: Letters from applicant and applicants representative Attachment 4: Copy of recorded easement fordriveway access through 2685 Johnson Attachment 5: Flag Lot standards, MC 16.18.060 Attachment 6: Resolution denial of the minor subdivision of the tract map to City Council Enclosed: Full-size project plans. dAPdunsmore\Subdivisions\TR 159-05 (2932 Augusta)\TR 159-05 PC rpt(3-22-06).DOC b .r Filing Fee: $10 Chmert 6 is RE Bvec J 21 J 0; Ic REFER TO SECnON4 SLO CITY CLERKsanlusoBpo APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMA77ON slcr" xt Reiss Name Mailing Address and Z-tp Code Phone Fax drew t+lerr arn X334 \lav r r+re Sl' . SLv g3s 1 Representative's Name Mailing Address and-Zip Code 6poisul6n 11=1410%Cw- cgs, 6-44 -4011 Title Phone Fax SECTION! SUBJECTOFAPPEAL 1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code(copy attached), I hereby appeal the decision of tfe0ii211?ii0ii 13°44 c1287C2 PLLi IaH.Ntt G @+•wtfSSua+ PLM APPL FE 100.00 Name of Office?, Committee or Commission decision being appealed)DI$IF`'' 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered:13lo 4 3.. The application or project was entitled: 134A fp-gz t J Nakaga s eggri as r ass • m 4 e n 4. 1 discussed the matter with the following City staff members ptJ Ltd1 t Ntl1r ?_ on mAl hoya _ Staff Member's Name and Department) Date) 5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so,when was it heard and by whom: V11 o SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what actionfs you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages,if necessary. This form continues on the other side. Pagel of 3 4;3 Reason for Appeal continued This project is being appealed for two reasons: 1. The general plan policy1 infill development 1 1 the 1 1Luis • f• was riotgivenweightI 1 " consideration. 2. Tbere ispotential / improving nonconforming driveway whichwill provide additional for all residentsalong 1 ' access easementand bettersight distances and pedestrian protection Johnson Avenue. r,.s'r.TAZ y.,K'y•] '+ vim' T^ w-A'•••- v t? > rw d -Je.•+w '' F 'R"1' "" a-* s:. y;' i , e• s: 9.r. T p 1.r• 61 ab r F Gd'C{r L [ »::t 3 r-xi w t * a •3l S wEymr-r•'< ,, `~ z .•" u s y . .fit^i.h ", aq r 1n .J.3,^' Ma r mgr J SE ,g Y ,,c7 t t} o ;,s- "U Y Ck. ,.'f` r .' ryF_ 1 ¢ E:C.ar ltl2^i. 7M 13 yy%h-i -V i'aIF1ylcYtt• Tr Itd fF r q -r tp c r a J i 'rK r 2r- 4 *.+.-F•i`a v w+'a..... r i W 4r r7 df yP"-r '" t'iCy;y 1 w` r'"1K ye^ .. P 4_A.tig ` N.S I ,' e:WR..{+ lI• C.54. i'. e qnjJ,pfiaf^ te. Sti`_i{. 1' r F' 3t- f7nRq' F° e I Ir, ryyry7a.( y- J,Yµsta{ r"• a•''+. irx@ Ui, e_ K`_ yerry I"++ t. 4fi:. 3, rr- g'' uY t K` Gy,.+ n Alya. VyIi9' C`! 7'rpS1''^ iX. yr' r1, tu•t A` i[•!? F( pe,.R,r i,. W" 4 vI, µJv l„ riyrA+ f(^wr(W' 7rydst-jY' iII4tR Li. tm.' G" rii. Jwya` iia. d' ib' tasfS+.—, 1r1, f', f,. J'1r,s< 0r' 4'.. s+ i'lxd4rJsn Y{ LR' a. r1Gral-+} ia,cer`'..^ cvJ{$.+ dt 1. t r 4tCj4V11.,:+.t, n k.., F.. y, r,.C. Hlw vAS'r{ t r Y. tiCd> S='' lrEsu,A',+w,` t k!" t^ 1”. e> M5rt i. 4b.* 3'. j al, 8lsI a,' s ut YP•! zij wlpId.' rC) ZM.Yr Stam" "i..•.{.z, ii v}_ c }P +•SYr"S` .r-. I t ., r- E-r cr7.^ Y,Li d...k•.- iwAa" e_ •r .,;. ! ` 'iyawr at s. w:' G£ 3 1"F fcq h %v @rte° Cf f t{ PI r°, i Y + > k ir s,fP, ,r !' ., ..Ja - ,t 1, tc• 3- E m YyeG9S3Et< * t R r *c a a 4 iy eq cY"` 6,-1`(al i' f(sJ'"'a's"`'"'1..''.., r x r; .r•. , ry, '" y<r..u z` it ear t Y .F l.6er.*" •?'4+''j M .K In C ^, fSAq 4 1 [ 71 A ,c 1 t t Y•.t'L..cl'. Y ,.r4k'r•"EII( CLt+rr-.'>- a r- rlY! F qLq` FI a 2 r=Yi _m[i i t i f3C t UI LCrai 94, t}e paFel e H y B( rr i 4 S]t >L:.r„.ti+r M. t YS TF N G i- •r V i. r TY * t (ba. ftGq'£ '^ 'S SS, x p_'- z " s r °k .3GpM v t L 1 a ' cirri x'VmrwS` Pr fia'+e 5-.v,..X':' a l d'1°4^,Fa ryWyf:•iA,'' dS ` R'H,b 4 iMi- VT: f i.lri' l Orly v l es}1,5,U--°^IS(,er r'+.,,. a`f-'.1!f trfS i i ia',y^7-lr, s i i Sra j 1•,aY; 1 y d >•`,, `-h'.+"^ «Y } at-`: - -1 r . ir . y.,a " Ga,f,hor >c a = t.•s c Gc ,.rrlc 7'1 C- l~ 6, •r G +n iC f ! -.G" 7lia ..,„ . y 6 J@! J pt ar , `2 rc Sr ci E 1 ,f1 } a, F, c 7tf z a w/ c> "}F 1/' ,[ r.' t Fll G_ a r,f-'!it( t ( rte-- I. e + ., w% F r "a i'a J Cn.In7 i!p 1 'S'i *' L i, , } c3-. 4, • Ki ar ' ' n.r Jti.'• J ; i.Y" h 0 v c vd} y'' i t `t rr.{d ffid.Jr.., ya{, + fM 4N. 4$ rye h 1 i C^''gn•gt jy Ar` y^+ 5, J q 4.."^' d rIq„ {' i !•1' A.34 r yS y. x ti L. , y q e:• i .j. Y.r 7}-! ,y M, a`.'tq.,s',4's.' -?';,,t('C^+e` 1Kiawt Nc'^. C;t',,,, >t 3 3. - t c7sa-,, i o Yl'"7!''r I°J -JJ • fi/a•')t' e Cllr r/ 4{s-}era+ r N"`e r ++o la 1:i/ 1. •^.. 1 i,'r•° roa"'a:T a q y`^a y,• w .' + d. r EJ 5 JKT$-.M-(J"`>.741j¢ / "Ar_{GyA,s`3`4}-r(r a r. j.r,'_, rvii` ; .. W T fit. k . c rt r'a” 'pry M1M1.. y y.Ty}^-t '/• y/•`' f LL. J `.•lt/"' M1 0" jati $$ i L c k , p " Gi 9YY.:DY_>R r Tw.s1. w.+X.r'w.aY:_, 4 m+'R16:r 'm'4]I.krt 1 'W . fl` T"•£'. 1f J'"'`7 1C''a..!}t. f. T . t r .`' b} "I C'"k j ' rY }{. t• [ y t rS 1 e ...Z It1J l'. r' C(e 'y At t ii i e ^_ k ` C 1/xv. 'ra:,-. r s iir •• G l , • ti :IGI i ••1-1 a r: v Y ... C 7r ' r 1 1 -•1 .ri.erl w x °'1 1 0 s..• Y r' di t.ry r • 1 - v Attachment 7 RESOLUTION NO.####-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TO DENY THE VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT MS/ER 158-04 (SLO 04-0338) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 13 2006, to consider the applicant's request for a tentative parcel map to create two lots from an existing lot with exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance Section, Section 16. 18.060 flag lot requirements, for property located.at 1364 San Marcos Court; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission denied the minor subdivision, based on findings; and WIFREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission's action was received by the City on September 21, 2006; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the appellant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff,presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1. Denial of Appeal. The request to appeal the Planning Commission's action denying the minor subdivision is hereby denied, based on the following findings: SECTION 1. Findings. 1. The site is not suited for the type and design of the subdivision due to the inability to create safe, logical site access. 2. The exception would allow approval of a minor subdivision that will result in improvements that will be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. 3. Granting the exception is not in accord with the intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations since the proposed access driveway does not meet required dimensions and required landscape buffering would not be possible. Attachment 7 MS 158-04 Resolution to deny(9-13-06) Page 2 4. Approval of a subdivision with the proposed access through a non-conforming flag lot is not consistent with General Plan Land Use and Housing Element policies that are designed to protect existing neighborhoods. In particular, granting access for this new property out to Johnson Avenue is inconsistent with Land Use Element Policy 2.2.5 which states that new residential developments, or redevelopments involving large sites, should be designed to orient low-density housing to local access streets, and major arterials through residential areas shall provide only limited private access or controlled street intersections. SECTION 2. Denial. The request for approval of Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.MS 158-04 County Map No. SLO 04-0338) and requested exceptions are hereby denied. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2006. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jona Lowell, City Attorney G:\CD-PLAN\Pdunsmore\Subdivisions\MS 158-04(1364 San Marcos)\MS 158-04 CC deny reso.doc Filing Fee: $100 " 4 R E ved city Of N/A 21 0,4' REFER TOSECTION4 SLD CITYCLERK ;san lues OBISPO APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION rtrt e_ oUc=+I'c Reiss Name Mailing Address and Zip Code Phone Fax pilrldrew 1+slcrrla» q 334 Wa ver4rec 4 SLv FiW1 Representative's Name Mailing Address and Zip Code Gy"!Suill a -PWaHv ew- L9es) 9A 4 - 4011 Title Phone Fax SECTION2. SUBJECTOFAPPEAL 1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (copy attached), 1 hereby appeal the decision of the: . Iav1 b11+`1Q G.Ia toSS10 FLAN AFF rt a?i}:4 Name of office?, Committee or Commission decision being appealed) 2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered:131 l0 3. The application or project was entitled: (3! Sarsg Marlrtee s C&*Fu y4 s E rt 158 • m sf Ta l s i e M+r 4. 1 discussed the matter with the following City staff member: heElaII Q 1451MGlye on 41&1 Joe. StaffVember's Name and Department) bate) 5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so, when was it heard and by whom: to A SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL Explain specifically what action/s you are appealing and why you believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages, if necessary. This form continues on the other side. Page 1 of 3 Reason for Appeal continued This project is being appealed for two reasons: 1. The general plan policy of infill development within the City of San Luis Obispo was not given full weight in the consideration. 2. There is potential of improving a non conforming driveway which will provide additional safety for all residents along the access easement and better sight distances and pedestrian protection at Johnson Avenue. SECTION 4. APPELLANTS RESPONSIBILITY The San Luis Obispo City Council values public participation in local government and encourages all forms of citizen involvement. However, due to real costs associated with City Council consideration of an appeal, including public notification, all appeals pertaining to a planning application or project are subject to a filing fee of$100.* Your right to exercise an appeal comes with certain responsibilities. If you file an appeal, please understand that it must be heard within 45 days from filing this form. You will be notified in writing of the exact date your appeal will be heard before the Council. You or your representative will be expected to attend,the public hearing, and to be prepared to make your case. Your testimony is limited to 10 minutes. A continuance may be granted under certain and unusual circumstances. If you feel you need to request a continuance, you must submit your request in writing to the City Clerk. Please be advised that if your request for continuance is received after the appeal is noticed to the public, the . Council may not be able to grant the request for continuance. Submitting a request for continuance does not guarantee that it will be granted;that action is at the discretion of the City Council hereby agree to appear and/or send a representative to appear an my behalf when' said appeal is " F fuleedd fora ublic hearing before the City Council. vG Si ature f Appellant) DA) Exceptions tot a fee: 1)Appeals of Tree Committee decisions. 2)The above-named appellant has already paid _ the City$100 to appeal this same matter to a City official or Council advisory body. This item is hereby calendared for A Ad yz!>-7 r3 Ems'- /y 266 Z c:City Attorney p J _ ppleC W L City Administrative Officer Department Head - Advisory Body Chairperson - A mi c ER City Clerk(original) AWIZL IJ Page 2 of 3 af03 AL'v,9 t oee- STu s 2 e/1 Se-c- 9/aa IIIIIhh IIIIIIfIIVIIIIuIIIIII III llll IIIII III IIIII U IIIIIII II cityo san u s oB SPO 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 RECEIVED September 22, 2006 CEP 2 8 1106 SLO CITY CLERK Jerry Reiss 820 Walnut Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 RE: PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP; 1364 SAN MARCOS COURT,Ms/ER 1M-04. Dear Mr. Reiss: In reference to your appeal being heard by the City Council, City code requires an appeal to be set for the next reasonably available council meeting, but in no event later than forty-five calendar days after the date of the filing of such notice of appeal with the City Clerk. Although you have agreed by phone to permit us to schedule your appeal after the 45 day deadline (i.e. November 5, 2006), we require a signed acknowledgement. Therefore,?lease sign and return this letter to the City Clerk's Office no later than October 2' . An envelope has been enclosed for your convenience. r r--7 Jerry " s Sincerely, Audre ooper City Clerk The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. Page 1 of 1 Audrey Hooper - File 158-04 From: "Gary Corsiglia" < RECEIVED To: Phil Dunsmore" <PDunsmor@slocity.org>NOV i 3 2006 Date:11/9/2006 9:24 PM Subject: File 158-04 SLO CITY CLERK Subject: File 158-04 November 9, 2006 Dear City Council members, My wife and I reside at 2707 Johnson Ave.which backs up to the present single family lot and would share a lot line with the new parcel being proposed. As we understand the proposal,the new second lot would be accessed by the driveway presently serving four houses with addresses 2675, 2677, 2679 and 2685 Johnson Ave. That present driveway is very narrow, only one lane wide in some areas due to the houses,trees and bushes.The additional traffic on the narrow drive will impact the residents of the four houses, but that is not our concern. Our concern is for the fire safety of a new house built on the proposed new lot and by location the fire safety of our home. If the new house were to have a fire,the timely access by the fire department to the property would be restricted by the narrow driveway. As the time to fight the fire is delayed, it could spread to the adjacent properties including our. home. Because of this concern we would ask the City Council to deny this request to split the lot into two parcels. This proposal was wisely denied by the Planning Commission at their September 13, 2006, meeting.The Planning Commission Staff recommendation was to deny this request.There have been no changes made in the proposal to address any of the concerns of the Planning Commission, their Staff or the adjacent property owners. Please deny this request again. Sincerely, Gary and Brigit Corsiglia CAOLINCI 21CD0 DIR MACAO O'FIN DIR FIRE CHIEF 2707 Johnson Ave. ZrATTORNEY ,0'PW DIR ZrCLERK/ORIG .e POLICE CHF San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 DEPT HEADS TZREC DIR Q`i UTIL DIR 2/HR DIR RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DATEIII-q& ITEM # file://C:\Documents and Settings\slouser\Local Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 11/13/2006 20 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Monday, March 30, 2026 4:30 PM To: Cc:Patino, Mallory; Gomez, Ivana Subject:1364 San Marcos - 2006 Staff Report Hi Bob, It was great to meet you just now. As promised, please see the 2006 staff report for the item related to the proposed subdivision at 1364 San Marcos. I also cc’d Mallory and Ivana who you also met at the front so that they have this too and are in the loop on the latest. Let us know when you have the email ready for us to forward to our city attorney’s office for review on this issue. 11/14/2006, PH 4 - APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION TO DENY A MINOR SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO LOTS FROM ONE L Thanks, Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 21 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Thursday, March 26, 2026 3:57 PM To: Subject:Follow Up for Minor Urban Lot Split (1364 San Marcos Ct.) Attachments:2021075598.pdf; 03. Prelminary Title Report.pdf Good afternoon, Apologies for missing the call back from Mr. Cooper. Unfortunately, I will be away from my desk for the rest of the day and will be out of the office tomorrow. I wanted to at least send you an email with some information I’ve gathered based on conversations I’ve had with Mallory and our Engineering team regarding the lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court. Regarding noticing – Mallory was correct that our standard tentative map applications include a noticing requirement. However, this application was for what’s called a minor urban lot split (also known as an SB-9 lot split). Unlike traditional subdivision applications, this is a state-mandated subdivision type that must be reviewed through a ministerial process. This means staff is only permitted to review these applications for compliance with a specific set of standards established by the state. It also prohibits local agencies from reviewing these applications in a public hearing and/or considering public comment. Therefore, public noticing is not distributed for minor urban lot splits. Regarding the easement – attached to this email is the title report submitted to our Engineering team, as well as the “Assignment of Grant of Easement” associated with this access easement. The grant of easement is a document recorded with the County Clerk that details the transfer of the right to access the easement in question from Collette M. Reiss to Paul Hatalsky (current property owner) in 2021. If this transfer access rights is incorrect/invalid, it is ultimately a civil matter to be resolved between you, any other property owners associated with the easement, and Mr. Hatalsky, as well as through coordination with the County Clerk to revoke or remov e these recorded documents if they are found to be inaccurate. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Countersigned By: Christie Clemons Authorized Officer or Agent Michael J. Nolan, President Attest: Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1234 Monterey Street, Suite 110, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Amendment C Title Officer: Reece Benson Email: rbenson@fnf.com Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB TO:Paul Hatalsky - C/O Development + Land Use Consulting 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Brian Cowen PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES):1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2025 at 07:30 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Parcel Map 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee as to Parcel(s) 1 Easement(s) more fully described below as to Parcel(s) 2 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41' WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 255 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF JOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 4 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2025-2026. 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area:003-000 Tax Identification No.: 004-782-081 Fiscal Year:2024-2025 1st Installment: $4,472.79 Paid 2nd Installment: $4,472.79 Open Exemption:$7,000.00 Land:$461,469.00 Improvements: $354,976.00 Personal Property: $0.00 Bill No.:2024/25 004-782-081 Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 3. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 4. All taxes or assessments approved, levied or enacted by the State, County, Municipality, Township or similar taxing authority, which are not yet due and payable, including but not limited to any retroactive increases in taxes or assessments resulting from any retroactive increase in the valuation of the land by the State, County, Municipality, Township, or other taxing authority. Any possible charges or assessments for water bills, public utilities, code enforcement and sanitary bills which may exist, but have not yet been recorded and/or filed. 5. Any liens or other assessments, bonds, or special district liens including without limitation, Community Facility Districts, that arise by reason of any local, City, Municipal or County Project or Special District. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 5 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: M. N. Goldtree, et ux Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 25, 1941 Recording No.: Book 303, Page 172, of Official Records Affects:The Southwesterly 5 feet of said land 7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable laws, as set forth in the document referred to in the numbered item last above shown. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or trust deed made in good faith and for value. 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Lines of poles and incidental purposes Recording No.: Book 306, Page 150, of Official Records Affects:Southwesterly line 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Purpose:Public utilities Affects:Southwesterly 5 feet of Parcel 1 10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: March 2, 1987 Recording No.: 13935, Book 2958, Page 678, of Official Records Affects:Northwesterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 6 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Reference is made to said document for full particulars 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation and Pacific Bell Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 27, 1989 Recording No.: 50559, Book 3356, Page 600, of Official Records Affects:Southeasterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars 12. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled:Option Agreement Dated:December 29, 1998 Executed by: Frank & Marilee Taylor, "Optionor" and Jerry M. Reiss and Collette Reiss, "Optionee" Recording Date: December 31, 1998 Recording No.: 1998-087987, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Quitclaim of Option Rights recorded on February 14, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008007408, of Official Records. 13. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, husband and wife as community property Purpose:Ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities Recording Date: December 1, 2003 Recording No.: 2003136913, of Official Records Affects:Said land and Re-Recording Date:December 24, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003144641, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 7 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 and Re-Recording Date:December 31, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003146088, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Assignment of Grant of Easement recorded of November 12, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021075598, of Official Records. 14. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount:$591,000.00 Dated:January 29, 2002 Trustor/Grantor: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man Trustee:Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), solely as nominee for Guaranteed Rate, Inc., a Delaware corporation Loan No.: 203438356 Recording Date: February 3, 2021 Recording No.: 2021008336, of Official Records END OF EXCEPTIONS Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 8 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 NOTES Note 1.Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 2.Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Note 3.Note: The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said Land a Single Family Residence, known as 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California, to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 4.Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note 5.If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6.The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 7.Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 9 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Note 8.The following Exclusion(s) are added to preliminary reports, commitments and will be included as an endorsement in the following policies A.2006 ALTA Owner's Policy (06-17-06). 6.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. B.2006 ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06). 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 9.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. C.ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13) and CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13). 10.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. D.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 12.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 13.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. E.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 7.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the public records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a tribe or on behalf of its members. 8.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage based on the application of a tribe's law resulting from the failure of the insured mortgage to specify state law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the insured mortgage. END OF NOTES Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017 Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 FSLC-512400177 TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation:Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective January 1, 2025 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g., Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); financial account information (e.g., loan or bank account information); biometric data (e.g., fingerprints, retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or other unique biological characteristics; and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; browser version, language, and type; domain name system requests; and browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. To improve our products and services. To prevent and detect fraud; To maintain the security of our systems, tools, accounts, and applications; To verify and authenticate identities and credentials; To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. State-Specific Consumer Privacy Information: For additional information about your state-specific consumer privacy rights, to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please follow the link Privacy Request, or email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Certain state privacy laws require that FNF disclose the categories of third parties to which FNF may disclose the Personal Information and Browsing Information listed above. Those categories are: FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Service providers; Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (fnf.com/california-privacy) or call (888) 413-1748. For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginquiries@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For additional information about your Oregon consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710 FNF is the controller of the following businesses registered with the Secretary of State in Oregon: Chicago Title Company of Oregon, Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon, Lawyers Title of Oregon, LoanCare, Ticor, Title Company of Oregon, Western Title & Escrow Company, Chicago Title Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Liberty Title & Escrow, Novare National Settlement Service, Ticor Title Company of California, Exos Valuations, Fidelity & Guaranty Life, Insurance Agency, Fidelity National Home Warranty Company, Fidelity National Management Services, Fidelity Residential Solutions, FNF Insurance Services, FNTG National Record Centers, IPEX, Mission Servicing Residential, National Residential Nominee Services, National Safe Harbor Exchanges, National Title Insurance of New York, NationalLink Valuations, NexAce Corp., ServiceLink Auction, ServiceLink Management Company, ServiceLink Services, ServiceLink Title Company of Oregon, ServiceLink Valuation Solutions, Western Title & Escrow Company For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Request website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy@fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 (11-09-18) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY (02-04-22) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7 Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: PART I 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (7-01-21) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27. 2. Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You; b. not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to You; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b. in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land. Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21. 5. The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 7. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 8. Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any other subsurface substance. 9. Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a or 27. 10. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws. 8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (07-01-2021) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.] 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. Notice of Available Discounts Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC - Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. FNTC - Fidelity National Title Company FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. FNTCCA - Fidelity National Title Company of California NTINY - National Title Insurance of New York TICOR - Ticor Title Company of California LTC - Lawyer's Title Company SLTC - ServiceLink Title Company Available Discounts CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be forty percent (40%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. DISASTER AREA TRANSACTIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended), or an Owner's Policy (Standard or Homeowners coverage). To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A. The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B. The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C. The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Notice of Available Discounts (continued) Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 DISASTER AREA ESCROWS (CTC, CLTC, FNTC, TICOR, LTC) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a loan or a sale escrow transaction. To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A. The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B. The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C. The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Standard minimum charge applies based upon property type. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. Applies to a single transaction per property. This rate is applicable to the following Zones/Counties: Zone 1.A: Orange County Zone 1.B: Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Zone 2: Los Angeles County Zone 3: Ventura County Zone 10: San Diego County Zone 12: Imperial County If used for a sale transaction, the application of this rate assumes the charge for the Residential Sale Escrow Services (RSES) fee will be split evenly between buyer and seller. As such and regardless of how the calculated applicable RSES will be split between the disaster victim and the other principal, the rate will be applied only to one half (1/2) of the calculated applicable RSES fee, regardless of whether the disaster victim is paying half (1/2) of the RSES fee (as is customary) or paying the entire fee. The rate under this provision will be fifty percent (50%) of disaster victims' one half (1/2) portion only and shall not apply to any portion paid by non-disaster victim. Additional services will be charged at the normal rates. MILITARY DISCOUNT RATE (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) Upon the Company being advised in writing and prior to the closing of the transaction that an active duty, honorably separated, or retired member of the United States Military or Military Reserves or National Guard is acquiring or selling an owner occupied one-to-four family property, the selling owner or acquiring buyer, as applicable, will be entitled to a discount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the otherwise applicable rates such party would be charged for title insurance policies. Minimum charge: Four Hundred Twenty-Five And No/100 Dollars ($425.00) The Company may require proof of eligibility from the parties to the transaction verifying they are entitled to the discount as described. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. MILITARY RATE (SLTC) A discount of twenty percent (20%) off the purchase transaction closing and settlement fee or a discount of One Hundred And No/100 Dollars ($100.00) off the refinance closing and settlement fee, will be applied when the loan is guaranteed by the United States Veterans Administration and the escrow fee is being paid by the consumer and is listed as paid by borrower on the Closing Disclosure and final Settlement Statement. 22 From:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Sent:Tuesday, March 24, 2026 3:53 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:1364 San Marcos - Easement Attachments:2021075598.pdf; 03. Prelminary Title Report.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Here you go. Title report from SB-9 submittal and 2021 assignment doc. Gabriel Munoz-Morris pronouns he/him/his Supervising Civil Engineer Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E GMunoz@slocity.org T 805.781.7592 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Countersigned By: Christie Clemons Authorized Officer or Agent Michael J. Nolan, President Attest: Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1234 Monterey Street, Suite 110, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Amendment C Title Officer: Reece Benson Email: rbenson@fnf.com Title No.:FSLC-512400177-RB TO:Paul Hatalsky - C/O Development + Land Use Consulting 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Brian Cowen PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES):1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2025 at 07:30 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Parcel Map 1.THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee as to Parcel(s) 1 Easement(s) more fully described below as to Parcel(s) 2 2.TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man 3.THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41' WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 255 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF JOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 4 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1.Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2025-2026. 2.Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area:003-000 Tax Identification No.:004-782-081 Fiscal Year:2024-2025 1st Installment:$4,472.79 Paid 2nd Installment:$4,472.79 Open Exemption:$7,000.00 Land:$461,469.00 Improvements:$354,976.00 Personal Property:$0.00 Bill No.:2024/25 004-782-081 Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 3.The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 4.All taxes or assessments approved, levied or enacted by the State, County, Municipality, Township or similar taxing authority, which are not yet due and payable, including but not limited to any retroactive increases in taxes or assessments resulting from any retroactive increase in the valuation of the land by the State, County, Municipality, Township, or other taxing authority. Any possible charges or assessments for water bills, public utilities, code enforcement and sanitary bills which may exist, but have not yet been recorded and/or filed. 5.Any liens or other assessments, bonds, or special district liens including without limitation, Community Facility Districts, that arise by reason of any local, City, Municipal or County Project or Special District. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 5 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 6.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:M. N. Goldtree, et ux Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date:July 25, 1941 Recording No.:Book 303, Page 172, of Official Records Affects:The Southwesterly 5 feet of said land 7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable laws, as set forth in the document referred to in the numbered item last above shown. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or trust deed made in good faith and for value. 8.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Lines of poles and incidental purposes Recording No.:Book 306, Page 150, of Official Records Affects:Southwesterly line 9.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Purpose:Public utilities Affects:Southwesterly 5 feet of Parcel 1 10.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date:March 2, 1987 Recording No.:13935, Book 2958, Page 678, of Official Records Affects:Northwesterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 6 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Reference is made to said document for full particulars 11.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation and Pacific Bell Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date:July 27, 1989 Recording No.:50559, Book 3356, Page 600, of Official Records Affects:Southeasterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars 12.Matters contained in that certain document Entitled:Option Agreement Dated:December 29, 1998 Executed by:Frank & Marilee Taylor, "Optionor" and Jerry M. Reiss and Collette Reiss, "Optionee" Recording Date:December 31, 1998 Recording No.:1998-087987, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Quitclaim of Option Rights recorded on February 14, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008007408, of Official Records. 13.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, husband and wife as community property Purpose:Ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities Recording Date:December 1, 2003 Recording No.:2003136913, of Official Records Affects:Said land and Re-Recording Date:December 24, 2003 and Re-Recording No.:2003144641, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 7 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 and Re-Recording Date:December 31, 2003 and Re-Recording No.:2003146088, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Assignment of Grant of Easement recorded of November 12, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021075598, of Official Records. 14.A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount:$591,000.00 Dated:January 29, 2002 Trustor/Grantor:Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man Trustee:Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary:Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), solely as nominee for Guaranteed Rate, Inc., a Delaware corporation Loan No.:203438356 Recording Date:February 3, 2021 Recording No.:2021008336, of Official Records END OF EXCEPTIONS Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 8 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 NOTES Note 1.Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 2.Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Note 3.Note: The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said Land a Single Family Residence, known as 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California, to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 4.Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note 5.If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6.The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 7.Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 9 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Note 8.The following Exclusion(s) are added to preliminary reports, commitments and will be included as an endorsement in the following policies A.2006 ALTA Owner's Policy (06-17-06). 6.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. B.2006 ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06). 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 9.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. C.ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13) and CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13). 10.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. D.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 12.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 13.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. E.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 7.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the public records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a tribe or on behalf of its members. 8.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage based on the application of a tribe's law resulting from the failure of the insured mortgage to specify state law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the insured mortgage. END OF NOTES Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date:5/11/2017 Current Version Date:5/11/2017 FSLC-512400177 TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation:Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective January 1, 2025 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g., Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); financial account information (e.g., loan or bank account information); biometric data (e.g., fingerprints, retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or other unique biological characteristics; and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; browser version, language, and type; domain name system requests; and browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. To improve our products and services. To prevent and detect fraud; To maintain the security of our systems, tools, accounts, and applications; To verify and authenticate identities and credentials; To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. State-Specific Consumer Privacy Information: For additional information about your state-specific consumer privacy rights, to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please follow the link Privacy Request, or email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Certain state privacy laws require that FNF disclose the categories of third parties to which FNF may disclose the Personal Information and Browsing Information listed above. Those categories are: FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Service providers; Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (fnf.com/california-privacy) or call (888) 413-1748. For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginquiries@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For additional information about your Oregon consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710 FNF is the controller of the following businesses registered with the Secretary of State in Oregon: Chicago Title Company of Oregon, Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon, Lawyers Title of Oregon, LoanCare, Ticor, Title Company of Oregon, Western Title & Escrow Company, Chicago Title Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Liberty Title & Escrow, Novare National Settlement Service, Ticor Title Company of California, Exos Valuations, Fidelity & Guaranty Life, Insurance Agency, Fidelity National Home Warranty Company, Fidelity National Management Services, Fidelity Residential Solutions, FNF Insurance Services, FNTG National Record Centers, IPEX, Mission Servicing Residential, National Residential Nominee Services, National Safe Harbor Exchanges, National Title Insurance of New York, NationalLink Valuations, NexAce Corp., ServiceLink Auction, ServiceLink Management Company, ServiceLink Services, ServiceLink Title Company of Oregon, ServiceLink Valuation Solutions, Western Title & Escrow Company For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Request website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy@fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 (11-09-18) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1.(a)Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2.Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a)whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4.Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5.Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6.Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1.Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4.Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6.Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY (02-04-22) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1.a.any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i.the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii.the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii.the subdivision of land; or iv.environmental remediation or protection. b.any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c.the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2.Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3.Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a.created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b.not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c.resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d.attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e.resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4.Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a.fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b.voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c.preferential transfer: i.to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii.for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5.Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6.Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7 Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: PART I 1.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6.Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7.Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (7-01-21) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1.a.any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i.the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii.the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii.the subdivision of land; or iv.environmental remediation or protection. b.any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c.the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27. 2.Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17. 3.Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a.created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You; b.not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c.resulting in no loss or damage to You; d.attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or e.resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy. 4.Lack of a right: a.to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b.in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land. Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21. 5.The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15. 6.Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a: a.fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b.voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c.preferential transfer: i.to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii.for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 7.Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 8.Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any other subsurface substance. 9.Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a or 27. 10.Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1.Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a.building; b.zoning; c.land use; d.improvements on the Land; e.land division; and f.environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2.The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3.The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4.Risks: a.that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b.that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c.that result in no loss to You; or d.that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5.Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6.Lack of a right: a.to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b.in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7.The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws. 8.Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake or subsidence. 9.Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21:1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (07-01-2021) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1.a.any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i.the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii.the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii.the subdivision of land; or iv.environmental remediation or protection. b.any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c.the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2.Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3.Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a.created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b.not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c.resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d.attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e.resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4.Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a.fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b.voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c.preferential transfer: i.to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii.for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5.Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6.Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7.Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below: 1.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6.Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7.Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1.(a)Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i)the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii)the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii)the subdivision of land; or (iv)environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b)Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2.Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a)created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b)not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e)resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4.Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a)a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b)a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5.Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below: 1.(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2.Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3.Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4.Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5.(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6.Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.] 7.Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. Notice of Available Discounts Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC - Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. FNTC - Fidelity National Title Company FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. FNTCCA - Fidelity National Title Company of California NTINY - National Title Insurance of New York TICOR - Ticor Title Company of California LTC - Lawyer's Title Company SLTC - ServiceLink Title Company Available Discounts CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be forty percent (40%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. DISASTER AREA TRANSACTIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended), or an Owner's Policy (Standard or Homeowners coverage). To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A.The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B.The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C.The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Notice of Available Discounts (continued) Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 DISASTER AREA ESCROWS (CTC, CLTC, FNTC, TICOR, LTC) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a loan or a sale escrow transaction. To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A.The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B.The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C.The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Standard minimum charge applies based upon property type. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. Applies to a single transaction per property. This rate is applicable to the following Zones/Counties: Zone 1.A: Orange County Zone 1.B: Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Zone 2: Los Angeles County Zone 3: Ventura County Zone 10: San Diego County Zone 12: Imperial County If used for a sale transaction, the application of this rate assumes the charge for the Residential Sale Escrow Services (RSES) fee will be split evenly between buyer and seller. As such and regardless of how the calculated applicable RSES will be split between the disaster victim and the other principal, the rate will be applied only to one half (1/2) of the calculated applicable RSES fee, regardless of whether the disaster victim is paying half (1/2) of the RSES fee (as is customary) or paying the entire fee. The rate under this provision will be fifty percent (50%) of disaster victims' one half (1/2) portion only and shall not apply to any portion paid by non-disaster victim. Additional services will be charged at the normal rates. MILITARY DISCOUNT RATE (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) Upon the Company being advised in writing and prior to the closing of the transaction that an active duty, honorably separated, or retired member of the United States Military or Military Reserves or National Guard is acquiring or selling an owner occupied one-to-four family property, the selling owner or acquiring buyer, as applicable, will be entitled to a discount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the otherwise applicable rates such party would be charged for title insurance policies. Minimum charge: Four Hundred Twenty-Five And No/100 Dollars ($425.00) The Company may require proof of eligibility from the parties to the transaction verifying they are entitled to the discount as described. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. MILITARY RATE (SLTC) A discount of twenty percent (20%) off the purchase transaction closing and settlement fee or a discount of One Hundred And No/100 Dollars ($100.00) off the refinance closing and settlement fee, will be applied when the loan is guaranteed by the United States Veterans Administration and the escrow fee is being paid by the consumer and is listed as paid by borrower on the Closing Disclosure and final Settlement Statement. f2021075598 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Helen Nolan San Luis Obispo - County Clerk -Recorder 11/12/2021 09:33 AM Reccrd"d at the request of: PUBL IC Titles. 1 Pages. 9 Fees: $120.00 Taxes: 0-00 Total: 120.00 'S USE ONLY FEE PAjf] E T [r) E MENT as of November 1, 2021, risky, an unmarried man as the "Parties" and 0, 2003, and recorded in Office on December 31, rrilyn K. Ward, husband San Luis Obispo, CA ;ranted, transferred and and wife as community egress, driveway and acated at 2685 Johnson fbispo County, State of L in length running from utheasterly boundary of nap recorded September of the County Recorder as grantees, or either of property, described as: hed Exhibit A — herein "Easement (in gross}„). Assignment of Grant of Easement 1364 San Marcos CL, San Luis Obispo California Page i 1 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 2 of 9- [The real property described in the above said EXFMIT "A„ to be benefitted by the Easement (in gross) is commonly known as: 1364 San Marcos Ct., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401; APN:.004-782-081, and is now owned by Paul Hatalsky, Grantee herein]. -E. Whereas, Jery.M. Reiss is now deceased, and his widow, Collette M. Reiss, for herein, is the sole surviving original grantee and sole owner of the Easement (n s) referenced in the above Recital A. C. Whereas, Grantor intends and desires to forever assign, grant, transfer an Grantor's entire interest in the Easement (in gross), to Grantee, inclu ' d all rights and privileges granted under the Easement (in grow) that i re to antor including any rights to acquire an appurtenant easement as provided in.as t (in gross), and Grantee intends and desires to accept said assignment;- tra seer and conveyance, including any and all rights and privileges granted�}niilEa t (in gross) -that inure to Grantor including any rights to acquire an.aftpurten t easent nt as provided in the Easement (in gross). _, / NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the; foregoing tals, and the mutual covenants, agreements and consideration set forth below,, tle sufficienoy of which are hereby agreed, the Parties agree m follows: \ 1. Assignment. For and in consideration of,, the total sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) and other good and valuable consideration was provided herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor go 'by, forever assigns, grants, transfers and conveys Grantor's entire interest in the Easemen-V 4-grossj to Grantee, including any and all rights and privileges granted under th"asem'ennjj (iiy'gosa)�that inure to Grantor including any rights to acquire an appurtenant easemafit,afl plodided jYv the Easement (in gross), and Grantee hereby accepts said assignment, grant, transf�rapdcgaJeyance, including any and all rights and privileges granted under the EasemeM"�in,'groasi ttrat inure to Grantor including any rights to acquire an appurtenant easement as pitgvided in`t 6'E`asement (n gross). 2. Warranties. Grantovifrgagnt3 anA w�tt8ms to Grantee that Grantor is the sole owner of the Easement (in gross), t(t�( tbgre, acerlo_otbeF conflicting interests or owners of the Easement (n gross) other than t &,,motor, and,;that Grantor has the full exclusive and absolute power, authority and ability tQ assi�+i; giant, ua`nsfer and convey the Easement (in gross) to Grantee as provided in this Assignmern , , 3.1. Incori 1 2 anon ,T, ila Parties incorporate by this reference the introductory paragraphs and recitals as if fill set to Y'herein verbatim, and that they are true and correct. 3.2.r�6n*rver. No waiver of any breach of any of the covenants or conditions of this Assignmetrit shall constitute a waiver of any succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other lemot" et condition contained herein. - umul'ative Remedied. No remedy or election under this Assignment shall be deemed elusive but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in eq+PtY '3:4 iberal Construction. The provisions of this Assignment shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purpose of resolving questions or interpretation or construction. Assignment of Gran[ of Easement 1364 San Marcos Cr., San Luis Obispo California Page 12 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 3 of 9 3.5. Construction. Throughout this Assignment, the use of the singular shall be construed to include the plural and vice versa. The use of any gender shall include all genders, whenever required by the context. 3.6. Choice of Law: Venue. The validity and construction of this Assignment slla{^ 1 be governed by the laws of the State of California and the venue for any action, mcf d' g arbitration, concerning this Assignment or any other cause of action shall be San Obi County, California. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this Assignment into, and is to be performed, in the above referenced County. 3.7. Severability of Provisions. If any provision of this Assignment i eld to b legal,, or invalid by any court of law, or arbitrator, in a final decision from which no I is o n be taken, such provision shall be deemed modified to eliminate the invalid'eteme , as so modified, such provision shall be deemed a part of this Assignment as tl on' oo''al oiled herein. The remaining provisions of this Assignment shall not be affect. by such /Nodific lion. 3.8. Advice. In entering into this Assignment, each N yrese\n\� titatpe; she or it has relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys, who are the attorneys of tlie�r own choice and that the terms of this Assignment have been completely read and explain¢d to them by their attorneys, and that those terms are fully understood and vol uivarily accepted. This Assignment and the terms and conditions thereof were determined in artn s length negotiations by, between and among the Parties hereto and their respective'equnsel, and each Party has received full and adequate independent counsel with respect to their on trance into this Assignment. 3.9. Advice. In entering into this Assignmen4 mhParty represents that he, she or it has negotiated this Assignment, have had an oppofprtrity`te 6e advised respecting the provisions contained herein and have had the right to app� ve 6 h and every provisions hereof, therefore, this Assignment shall not be wnslmed against tier P�- rVy as a result of the preparation of this Assignment by or on behalf of either Party.,", 3.10. Counterparts. The Parties_a}T cute this Assignment in two or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggriegate, be.sign by all the Paries; each counterpart shall be deemed an original instrument as agama4any Party who has signed it. 3.11. Successors anb As'sieitsj Runs -/with the Land. This Assignment shall be binding on and inure to the b fit tiaShe res'peciive successors, assignees and personal representatives of the Parties. The provins,Oft7tig71,ssigdment shall be easements and covenants that run with the land in perpetuity.- 3.12. Consen - enk;(e,consent or approval of any Party is required, that Party shall not reasonably witllltgt I sucl consent or approval. 3.13. Exb��ilb it� .All a Whits referenced to or attached to this Assignment are incorporated herein by this tefCre�R6&- %` headings, titles, and subtitles of this Assignment are inserted solely shall be ignored in any construction of this Assignment. ;ssence. Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this 3.16.IIAttornevs' Fees. If any legal proceeding, arbitration or other action is brought or ened fqf the enforcement or interpretation of this Assignment, or because of an alleged i is ch, default or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this Assignment, and the prevailing Party in any such action(s) should incur any legal fees, including, but not limited to, attomeys' fees, paralegal fees, expert witness fees and other similar costs, the Assignmem of Grant of Fasemear 1364 San Marcos Ct, San Luis Obispo Catifomia Page 13 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 4 of 9 successful or prevailing Party or Parties to any such dispute or action shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys' fees and additional legal costs incurred, together with any other relief to which they may otherwise be entitled, as determined by an arbitrator, judge at trial, or upon appeal or petition. 3.17. Entire Aareement. All prior agreements between the Parties in rel4tesubject matter contained herein,incorporated in this Assignment which constitutageement. Its terms are intended by the Parties as a final expression o£ their agr respect to such trms as are included herein and may not be contradicted byfdprior agreement or contemporaneous oral agreement. ThefiuteAssignment constitutes the complete and exclusive statement ofits terms attilnoa nsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial or arbitration, pope cam any, involving this Assignment. Any amendments to this Assignment shall be ptdt vo' ass in writing and attached hereto, identified as an amendment to this Assign 'em ands ed ted by all of the Parties, or their respective agents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have execute B this Assignp{ of the date fist written above. GRANTOR: GRANTS , - - Collette M. Reiss, a widow Paul Flafah ky, an unmarried man Assignment of Grmrt of Easement 1364 San Marcos Ct., San Luis Obispo California Page 14 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 5 of 9 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that t �document STATE OF GALW&MA MAf/D ✓U! )SS COUNTY OF e e nr r me na.�O,d,UE,P� On //I0-i1,29�/ ,before me, v�/,0///V 1,W Not af._Nntpp' onally appeared Collette M. Reiss, who proved to me on the basis of satisfaCtary erd�ttce the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowled to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacityoles), A al that�is/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the erson s , or the entity/ . upon behalf -of Which the person(s) P () tY acted, executed the instrument. \1 � JI I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws 'of he Smfe�of Cthfbrr a that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. �\ -- -- /A.5/0 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Si a re . �•. s'area for official notarial seal `✓ ! .\``— � / JUDITH K 11AIR0 �. \ �/� COMMISSION N0. 20180253 \ \� \ NOTARY PUBLIC �% STATE OF IDANO �M Assignment of Grant of Easemem 1364 San Marcos Ct., San Lois Obispo Califomia Page 15 of DOC #2021075598 Page 8 of 9 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfidness, accuracy, or validity of that document STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ) OnMme_W1.iibe ?, QOZlbefore me, CLXV k(L Notary Put rt, ally appeared Paul Hatao(s) who proved too t on the basis of nt and be the geerson(s) whose name(s)�'.S%are sub�ribed to the within instrument and ow t that she/they executed the same in 1 er/their authorized capacity(ies , d that er/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity tt��rt behalf wh; the_person(a) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the law", the Stat 'If California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. /O titre - // \. O v( 2h;i 4 for official notarial seal CONNIE LEON Coum 2242601 b M eMo.. FORM SAN Luis N Mr Caw, Ev. MAY 13,, M22 Assignment of Grant of Easement 1364 San Mamos Ct, San Luis Obispo California Page 16 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 7 of 9 Exhibit A "Easement (in gross)" See Attached O. Assigment of Chant of Easement 1364 San Mamw Ct., San Luis Obispo California Page 17 of 7 DOC #2021075598 Page 8 of 9 JULIE RODEWALD 06 San Luis OWgw County—CIerMRucotdm 1213110 Order No. Rrmrded a IN nqum a 0:08 Ak Escrow No. Public Loan Na. g'oc#: 2003146088 r , 1 �•r P WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: J.M. Reiss Fast 10.00 9304 Carmel Road 0.00 Atascadero, CA 93422 06, -0.00 DUCIAK WARY aUNSTER TA%r�0 ww.r _k.. Co N•hnaltlraNna va,eer lT•paeoon oR \. `•\ .....CanMdad on Mecnrgaalinnor glu•IW lbnaa enN Cam: son.N.or do •a"W—Fran. v:004-782-078 N GRANT OF EASFMENT��._ THIS DOCUMENT IS. BEING RECORDED SOLELY TO CORRECT THE CRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT GRANTED IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED 12.1011 AS DOCUMENTING- 2003136913. FILED FEE PND E:BrdF, t)W OF \........._ STATE FOR A VALUASLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which ishereby, acknowledged, James E. Ward, Jr- and Marilyn K. Ward, husband andavife;:as joint.tenants, hereby GRANT, TRANSFER AND CONVEY to/�/.,•;..�`� Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss,'huspand-4nll, '"Ate munity property, anon•e%clusive easement, forpurposes of ingrates„e971ts,�drirea'ray aritl underground utilities, over and through that property located at 2685 Johnson Avenue in the Glyn( San Luis :Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, State of California, described as a strip 19 feet wide and 255 feet n length hin, o from the westerly boundary of Johnson Avenue along the southeaslerty boundaryof Parcel C of parcel Map SLQ�0-12'I, note rding to the map recorded September 17, 1982 in Book 32, Page 73 of Parcel Maps. in thoW. lice of the`County, Recorder of said County. Said rant of easement shall be 9 p1 grdae,\unhl such time as grantees, or either of them, acquire an ownership interest in the adjacent real profetty de@britbed as: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AI which time said ea•em4nfsl'i YI belly. oascneed adjacent real prcggW- Jams E. Ward., Jr. Mad yn K. We 1.alt V - } ConarMam-ces Fa San Lub DhePa Caaxy NyComm EV.Jet27 200s ( rn..s a,en Woff—I'oienai seal, DOC #2021075598 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT "A" THATPORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TH OF SAN LUIS. OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORN 1NG P RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1993, IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAP ORE P TIC RLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE SAID - T 17 UTH - 53-50'00" WEST -(REC- SOUTH 53-41'WEST)230.07FEETTOTHE TOFBEGBJNING;, THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAIDNORTHWES LINE OF SAID LOT 17. TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWE Y LINE 0 ID LOT 17, SOUTH 36- 15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERL RNER SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT "A" OF PARCEL _SC_ -341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN .LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCO G TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST "] 7; 19731N BOOT 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH Y LINE OF SAID -LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT" O MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER-0OF SAH) LOT "A"; A INT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36ro15'00" EAST A DISTANCE, t37. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36- IS'00^ WEST ALONG SAIiO Lii�E 3 . I F T TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, -END OF D000MEN a DWD—WUMENr 23 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Monday, November 24, 2025 1:17 PM To:Lucia Maceri Cc:Gabriela Ugalde Subject:RE: Parcel Maps Attachments:03. Prelminary Title Report.pdf Hi Lucia, Melissa and I will head over to the office to handwrite in the names for both maps sometime this afternoon. Also, please see attached for the preliminary title report. Thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Lucia Maceri <lmaceri@co.slo.ca.us> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2025 9:12 AM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Cc: Gabriela Ugalde <gugalde@co.slo.ca.us> Subject: Parcel Maps Good Morning. I’ve reviewed the maps submitted yesterday and I’ll need a couple quick corrections prior to recording: Parcel Map SLO 25-0003: The declaration recording with the map must state the name of the declarant/owner on the first page. If you’d like to e-mail a replacement page that states trustees Michael E Guerra and Beverly T Guera as the declarant, I can replace the page. Alternatively, you can handwrite their names on the first page in person. Parcel Map SLO 24-0045: Same issue/solution as above. The owner’s name (Paul Hatalsky) must appear on the first page of the document. Additionally, please let me know which title company will guarantee this map so I can get in contact with them. 24 Let me know if you have any questions. www.slovote.com Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram 25 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Monday, November 17, 2025 7:26 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:RE: PM SLO 24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos - FMAP-0167-2025 Thank you for your help, Matt! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 9:18 AM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Subject: FW: PM SLO 24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos - FMAP-0167-2025 Hi Hepzi, I saved this to the folder here: \\chstore8\PublicWorks\Development\SUBDIVISIONS and Lot Line Adjustments\Parcel Maps\24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos\3rd Review https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary I’m sending Brian Cowen an email on next steps. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development 26 Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Doug R < Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 7:43 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: PM SLO 24-0045 Gentlemen, I have completed my review of the resubmitted draft of PM SLO 24-0045 and I have no corrections or comments. Doug 27 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Tuesday, November 4, 2025 9:18 AM To:Dadala, Hephzibah Subject:FW: PM SLO 24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos - FMAP-0167-2025 Hi Hepzi, I saved this to the folder here: \\chstore8\PublicWorks\Development\SUBDIVISIONS and Lot Line Adjustments\Parcel Maps\24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos\3rd Review https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary I’m sending Brian Cowen an email on next steps. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Doug R < Sent: Monday, November 3, 2025 7:43 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: PM SLO 24-0045 Gentlemen, I have completed my review of the resubmitted draft of PM SLO 24-0045 and I have no corrections or comments. Doug 28 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Friday, October 17, 2025 3:30 PM To:Doug R; Dadala, Hephzibah Cc:DeGiovanni, Stephanie; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:3rd Review - printed submittal ready for pick-up - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Attachments:00. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Transmittal.pdf; 01. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 2nd Map Check Response Narrative.pdf; 02. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Parcel Map-18X26 PM MYLARS.pdf; 03. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Closure Calculations.pdf Hi Doug, Attached is the 3rd Submittal of SB-9 Urban Lot Split, Parcel Map SLO 24-0045. A printed copy is available at the counter. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications TRANSMITTAL Date: August 15, 2025 To: Hepzi Dadala, Engineering I City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805-781-7575 HDadala@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 (FMAP-0167-2025) Map Check #1 Re-Submittal Dear Ms. Dadala, Please ﬁnd the following documents enclosed for processing: 1.Map Check #1 Responses 2.Updated Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 3.Updated Closure Calculations Package Please kindly let me know of any assistance or additional information I can provide in support of the City’s review and acceptance of the Parcel Map for recordation. Sincerely, Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting cc: Paul Hatalsky, Property Owner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - PM SLO 24-0045 - Review #2 2 lot subdivision of Parcel C, LLA 2887 OR 179 Owner(s): Hatalsky Location: 1364 San Marcos Ct Surveyor: MBS, J. Herman PLS 9420 August 26, 2025 TO: Gabriel Munoz - Morris, Civil Engineer FROM: Doug Rion, PLS, Engineering consultant (805) 704-6778, slocorider@gmail.com RE: Second review draft parcel map PM SLO 24-0045 I have reviewed the revised draft parcel map, closure calculations and reference documents and have the following comments: Sheet 2 1. Parcel 2 dimension labels do not agree with closure inverse data (dated 8/12/25). 2. Sum of Parcel 1 + Parcel 2 area does not agree with overall boundary area per inverse closure report submitted. 3. Some Measured data is not noted with M per the map legend. 4. Check R7 Book / Page, 30 MB 86 not found in Co SLO Map Index. 5. See miscellaneous corrections on the check print. See comments and corrections in red ink on the attached copy of the draft map. Disregard any pencil markings, they are only my working notes and scribbles. Please Refer to Updated Closure Report. Parcel 2 Closure Data and Dimension Labels Now Agree. Sum of Parcels 1 & 2 Now Agree with Overall Boundary Area Per Closure Report. R7 Corrected to Read 30 MB 84 Measured Data is Now Noted with M as Indicated on Check Print The Miscellaneous Corrections on the Check Print have been Addressed. 25.10.13 Responses from the Applicant PARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045 SAN MARCOS COURTDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2DDDPARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045JOHNSON AVENUE Parcel Map Check Report Date: 8/12/2025 8:58:42 AM Parcel Name: Boundary - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Client:Prepared by: Brian Cowan Preparer: Linda Richardson 24-094 MBS Land Surveys 3559 South Higuera Street North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 132.40' North: 5,341.6984'East: 5,244.5858' Segment# 3: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6564'East: 5,305.3769' Segment# 4: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2435'East: 5,298.5488' End North: 5,231.0807'East: 5,260.0449' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6866'East: 5,243.6807' End North: 5,222.0063'East: 5,253.7728' Segment# 6: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3910'East: 5,248.8721' Segment# 7: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' North: 5,300.1483'East: 5,188.0331' Segment# 8: Line Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0533'East: 5,109.7881' Perimeter: 615.07'Area: 15,950Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0035 Course: N31° 49' 00"W Error North : 0.00295 East: -0.00183 Parcel Name: Parcel 1 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Precision 1: 175,731.43 North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 91.54' North: 5,374.6603'East: 5,220.4393' Segment# 3: Line Course: S53° 34' 21"W Length: 34.81' North: 5,353.9899'East: 5,192.4309' Segment# 4: Line Course: S36° 14' 31"E Length: 40.78' North: 5,321.0997'East: 5,216.5398' Segment# 5: Line Course: S53° 41' 22"W Length: 35.38' North: 5,300.1491'East: 5,188.0300' Segment# 6: Line Parcel Name: Parcel 2 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0540'East: 5,109.7850' Perimeter: 405.12'Area: 7,870Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0062 Course: N53° 17' 38"W Error North : 0.00368 East: -0.00494 Precision 1: 65,340.32 North:5,300.1462'East:5,188.0341' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 41' 22"E Length: 35.38' North: 5,321.0969'East: 5,216.5440' Segment# 2: Line Course: N36° 14' 31"W Length: 40.78' North: 5,353.9871'East: 5,192.4350' Segment# 3: Line Course: N53° 34' 21"E Length: 34.81' North: 5,374.6574'East: 5,220.4435' Segment# 4: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 40.85' North: 5,341.7036'East: 5,244.5841' Segment# 5: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6616'East: 5,305.3751' Segment# 6: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2487'East: 5,298.5471' End North: 5,231.0859'East: 5,260.0431' Segment# 7: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6918'East: 5,243.6790' End North: 5,222.0115'East: 5,253.7711' Segment# 8: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3962'East: 5,248.8703' Segment# 9: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' Parcel Name: Sewer easement - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False North: 5,300.1535'East: 5,188.0313' Perimeter: 431.90'Area: 8,080Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0079 Course: N20° 54' 08"W Error North : 0.00733 East: -0.00280 Precision 1: 54,668.35 North:5,231.0822'East:5,260.0472' Segment# 1: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6880'East: 5,243.6830' End North: 5,222.0078'East: 5,253.7751' Segment# 2: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3924'East: 5,248.8743' Segment# 3: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 32.50' North: 5,244.4656'East: 5,229.4722' Parcel Name: Ties - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Segment# 4: Line Course: N88° 48' 13"E Length: 37.88' North: 5,245.2565'East: 5,267.3440' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 16.05'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 22°59'05"Tangent: 8.13' Chord: 15.94'Course: S27° 12' 44"W Course In: S51° 17' 44"E Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2443'East: 5,298.5593' End North: 5,231.0816'East: 5,260.0553' Perimeter: 103.75'Area: 544Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0082 Course: S86° 01' 56"E Error North : -0.00057 East: 0.00816 Precision 1: 12,652.44 North:5,000.0000'East:5,000.0000' Segment# 1: Line Course: N78° 28' 32"W Length: 1,567.59' North: 5,313.1825'East: 3,464.0133' Segment# 2: Line Course: S86° 57' 36"E Length: 1,787.37' North: 5,218.3927'East: 5,248.8680' Segment# 3: Line Course: S48° 43' 56"W Length: 331.11' North: 4,999.9995'East: 4,999.9941' Perimeter: 3,686.07'Area: 206,693Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0059 Course: S85° 01' 23"W Error North : -0.00051 East: -0.00589 Precision 1: 624,757.63 29 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, October 13, 2025 5:22 PM To:Dadala, Hephzibah Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Attachments:00. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Transmittal.pdf; 01. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 2nd Map Check Response Narrative.pdf; 02. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Parcel Map-18X26 PM MYLARS.pdf; 03. 25.10.13 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Closure Calculations.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Hepzi. Here is our submittal package for Map Check #3. I will bring hardcopies to the counter for this one and SLO 25-0003 as soon as they are available from the printer. Thanks and have a great evening! Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Oct 13, 2025, at 7:28 AM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning Brian, Thanks for asking for clarification. Please submit another round of map check so we can make sure everything is good for the mylars. Thanks, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I 30 Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 7:21 AM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Hi Hepzi, I just wanted to ask for clarification on your previous message. Are you ok with us making the corrections and submitting the mylars, or do we need to submit for another round of map check? Thanks and have a great weekend! Brian 31 Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Oct 9, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Hepzi. No worries, I will make sure we provide a copy of the original recorded agreement with the mylars. Have a great day! Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 32 On Oct 9, 2025, at 8:45 AM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, False alarm, the agreement doesn’t have to get recorded concurrently with the map. Could you just plan to provide a copy of the original recorded agreement like discussed in your response #1? <image007.png> Thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image008.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image009.png><image010.png><image011.png><image012.png ><image013.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dadala, Hephzibah Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 7:45 AM To: 'Brian Cowen' <briancowen@mac.com> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: RE: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Good morning Brian, Could you please add the Affidavit of Intent to Owner Occupy to the list of docs that will be recorded concurrently (under the Sewer Lateral Agreement)? Minor correction so just emailing you about it, thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image008.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image009.png><image010.png><image011.png><image012.png ><image013.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 33 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 6:52 PM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Subject: Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Thank you Hepzi! We will take care of the corrections right away. Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Oct 8, 2025, at 4:40 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: The email bounced b/c of file size, but please try this share file link: <image007.png> SLO 24-0045 2nd Check Print.pdf Thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Dadala, Hephzibah Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:26 PM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines 34 Hi Brian, Thank you so much for your patience! Please see attached for technical comments from Surveying. Once these items are addressed, we are good to proceed with recording the Affidavit of Intent to Owner Occupy and the Shared Private Sewer Lateral Agreement with the map. Thank you, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications <SLO 24-0045 2nd Review comments.pdf> 35 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:40 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:FW: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Attachments:SLO 24-0045 2nd Review comments.pdf The email bounced b/c of file size, but please try this share file link: SLO 24-0045 2nd Check Print.pdf Thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Dadala, Hephzibah Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:26 PM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Hi Brian, Thank you so much for your patience! Please see attached for technical comments from Surveying. Once these items are addressed, we are good to proceed with recording the Affidavit of Intent to Owner Occupy and the Shared Private Sewer Lateral Agreement with the map. Thank you, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org 36 T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - PM SLO 24-0045 - Review #2 2 lot subdivision of Parcel C, LLA 2887 OR 179 Owner(s): Hatalsky Location: 1364 San Marcos Ct Surveyor: MBS, J. Herman PLS 9420 August 26, 2025 TO: Gabriel Munoz - Morris, Civil Engineer FROM: Doug Rion, PLS, Engineering consultant (805) 704-6778, slocorider@gmail.com RE: Second review draft parcel map PM SLO 24-0045 I have reviewed the revised draft parcel map, closure calculations and reference documents and have the following comments: Sheet 2 1. Parcel 2 dimension labels do not agree with closure inverse data (dated 8/12/25). 2. Sum of Parcel 1 + Parcel 2 area does not agree with overall boundary area per inverse closure report submitted. 3. Some Measured data is not noted with M per the map legend. 4. Check R7 Book / Page, 30 MB 86 not found in Co SLO Map Index. 5. See miscellaneous corrections on the check print. See comments and corrections in red ink on the attached copy of the draft map. Disregard any pencil markings, they are only my working notes and scribbles. 37 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Wednesday, October 8, 2025 4:26 PM To:Brian Cowen Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #2 - comments and redlines Attachments:SLO 24-0045 2nd Review comments.pdf; SLO 24-0045 2nd Check Print.pdf Hi Brian, Thank you so much for your patience! Please see attached for technical comments from Surveying. Once these items are addressed, we are good to proceed with recording the Affidavit of Intent to Owner Occupy and the Shared Private Sewer Lateral Agreement with the map. Thank you, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - PM SLO 24-0045 - Review #2 2 lot subdivision of Parcel C, LLA 2887 OR 179 Owner(s): Hatalsky Location: 1364 San Marcos Ct Surveyor: MBS, J. Herman PLS 9420 August 26, 2025 TO: Gabriel Munoz - Morris, Civil Engineer FROM: Doug Rion, PLS, Engineering consultant (805) 704-6778, slocorider@gmail.com RE: Second review draft parcel map PM SLO 24-0045 I have reviewed the revised draft parcel map, closure calculations and reference documents and have the following comments: Sheet 2 1. Parcel 2 dimension labels do not agree with closure inverse data (dated 8/12/25). 2. Sum of Parcel 1 + Parcel 2 area does not agree with overall boundary area per inverse closure report submitted. 3. Some Measured data is not noted with M per the map legend. 4. Check R7 Book / Page, 30 MB 86 not found in Co SLO Map Index. 5. See miscellaneous corrections on the check print. See comments and corrections in red ink on the attached copy of the draft map. Disregard any pencil markings, they are only my working notes and scribbles. 38 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Thursday, August 28, 2025 4:21 PM To:LaFreniere, Matt; McCaffrey, Seano; Dadala, Hephzibah; Estrada, Ethan; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Good afternoon, I completed the second round of review, and the recorded shared sewer lateral agreement is still needed. The applicant indicated that they would record it concurrently with the map. I am good with moving this forward (ready for action) and added a note that the shared sewer lateral agreement is reviewed and approved to record with the map (thank you for this language, Gabe!) and CDD Engineering is to confirm recordation of the agreement. Thank you, Shawna From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2025 11:23 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi Matt, I completed my review. The draft shared sewer lateral agreement looks good – they just need to provide a recorded agreement then I can sign off. Thank you, Shawna From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:35 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi all, This was routed with a due date of today, 7/2/2025. I told the applicant we anticipate comments might be available by 7/9/2025. Please complete your review by then or let me know your anticipated completion date. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III 39 Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 40 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2025 8:08 AM To:Dadala, Hephzibah Cc:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Subject:FW: PM SLO 24-0045 2nd review transmittal - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Attachments:SLO 24-0045 2nd Review comments.pdf Follow Up Flag:Flag for follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Hepzi, Here’s email 2 of 2 from Doug. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Doug R <slocorider@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 7:09 AM To: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: PM SLO 24-0045 2nd review transmittal DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - PM SLO 24-0045 - Review #2 2 lot subdivision of Parcel C, LLA 2887 OR 179 Owner(s): Hatalsky Location: 1364 San Marcos Ct Surveyor: MBS, J. Herman PLS 9420 August 26, 2025 TO: Gabriel Munoz - Morris, Civil Engineer FROM: Doug Rion, PLS, Engineering consultant (805) 704-6778, slocorider@gmail.com RE: Second review draft parcel map PM SLO 24-0045 I have reviewed the revised draft parcel map, closure calculations and reference documents and have the following comments: Sheet 2 1. Parcel 2 dimension labels do not agree with closure inverse data (dated 8/12/25). 2. Sum of Parcel 1 + Parcel 2 area does not agree with overall boundary area per inverse closure report submitted. 3. Some Measured data is not noted with M per the map legend. 4. Check R7 Book / Page, 30 MB 86 not found in Co SLO Map Index. 5. See miscellaneous corrections on the check print. See comments and corrections in red ink on the attached copy of the draft map. Disregard any pencil markings, they are only my working notes and scribbles. 41 From:Doug R <slocorider@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 27, 2025 7:09 AM To:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:PM SLO 24-0045 2nd review transmittal Attachments:SLO 24-0045 2nd Review comments.pdf 42 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Tuesday, August 19, 2025 8:55 AM To:Doug R Cc:Dadala, Hephzibah; DeGiovanni, Stephanie; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:2nd Submittal - for pick-up - Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 - 1364 San Marcos Ct. Attachments:00. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Transmittal.pdf; 01. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Map Check #1 Responses.pdf; 02. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Parcel Map SLO 24-0045.pdf; 03. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Closure Calcuations.pdf; sheet 1 markup.pdf; sheet 2 markup.pdf Hi Doug, This 2nd Submittal is ready for pick-up at the counter. SB-9 Urban Lot Split, Parcel Map SLO 24-0045FMAP-0570-2025 (1370 Stafford St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405) FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications TRANSMITTAL Date: August 15, 2025 To: Hepzi Dadala, Engineering I City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805-781-7575 HDadala@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 (FMAP-0167-2025) Map Check #1 Re-Submittal Dear Ms. Dadala, Please ﬁnd the following documents enclosed for processing: 1.Map Check #1 Responses 2.Updated Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 3.Updated Closure Calculations Package Please kindly let me know of any assistance or additional information I can provide in support of the City’s review and acceptance of the Parcel Map for recordation. Sincerely, Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting cc: Paul Hatalsky, Property Owner Final Map Review #1 Project Address 1364 San Marcos Project Name SB-9 Urban Lot Split - Senate Bill 9 SB9 Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Application Number FMAP-0167-2025 Planning Ethan Estrada (805) 781-7576 | ejestrad@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft affidavit of intent to owner occupy is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Engineering Hephzibah Dadala (805) 781-7575 | hdadala@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. See technical comments on “1st Surveying map check” redlines provided by Surveying. 2. Update the City Engineer’s Statement and PE License to #87574 for the current Supervising Civil Engineer. 3. Lot lines do not match from approved tentative parcel map and parcel map submitted. Make combined square footage of Parcel 1 and 2 on final and tentative parcel map match. Currently, total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the final parcel map is 15933 SF and total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the approved tentative parcel map is 15908 SF. 4. Correct the spelling of “OBISPO”, currently spelled “IN THE CITY OF OBIPSO”, in the parcel map description at the bottom right corner of both sheets 1 and 2. 25.08.15 Map Check #1 Responses from Applicant Applicant will provide a copy of the original recorded affidavit with the mylars. Redline comments have been addressed with the updated Parcel Map and Closure Calculations (MBS has gone back out and located the “missing monuments” along the Northerly and Southerly lines of the parent parcel). City Engineer’s Statement has been Updated as requested. Spelling of “Obispo” has been corrected on both sheets. (See Response Below) * Engineering Comment #3 Response: Surveyor has gone back out and located the “missing monuments” along the Northerly and Southerly lines of the parent parcel. Please refer to the updated the Map Sheets & Closure Calculations. Page 2 Utilities Shawna Scott (805) 781-7176 | sscott@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft shared private sewer lateral agreement is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Building Sean McCaffrey 805-781-7168 | smccaffr@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. Sean is just on this review to verify shared sewer is okay with the utility's department as i will leave the call to them if for some reason is works out for best interest for everyone. The plumbing code will requi re these to be separated if building has final say on this. (311 CPC). Fire Julianna Hutchinson 805-783-7805 | jhutchin@slocity.org ☒ Ready for Action ☐ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. (comment) Applicant will provide an original copy of the executed shared sewer lateral agreement with the mylars so it can record concurrently with the Parcel Map. Project has been in communication with the Utilities Department regarding the City’s preferred approach to providing future sewerage to Parcel 1, since project inception. Utilities Department indicates that a shared Sewer Lateral is preferred because it results in fewer connections to the public main. Applicant has already conducted rehabilitation of the existing sewer lateral (including provisions for future sewerage to Parcel 1, as requested by the Utilities Department. Applicant will provide an executed original copy of the shared sewer lateral agreement with the mylars (addresses future ownership, maintenance and repair of the shared, private lateral), which will record concurrently with the Parcel Map. PARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045 SAN MARCOS COURTDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2DDDPARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045JOHNSON AVENUE Parcel Map Check Report Date: 8/12/2025 8:53:43 AM Parcel Name: Boundary - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Client:Prepared by: Brian Cowan Preparer: Linda Richardson 24-094 MBS Land Surveys 3559 South Higuera Street North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 132.40' North: 5,341.6984'East: 5,244.5858' Segment# 3: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6564'East: 5,305.3769' Segment# 4: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2435'East: 5,298.5488' End North: 5,231.0807'East: 5,260.0449' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6866'East: 5,243.6807' End North: 5,222.0063'East: 5,253.7728' Segment# 6: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3910'East: 5,248.8721' Segment# 7: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' North: 5,300.1483'East: 5,188.0331' Segment# 8: Line Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0533'East: 5,109.7881' Perimeter: 615.07'Area: 15,950Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0035 Course: N31° 49' 00"W Error North : 0.00295 East: -0.00183 Parcel Name: Parcel 1 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Precision 1: 175,731.43 North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 91.54' North: 5,374.6603'East: 5,220.4393' Segment# 3: Line Course: S53° 34' 21"W Length: 34.81' North: 5,353.9899'East: 5,192.4309' Segment# 4: Line Course: S36° 14' 31"E Length: 40.78' North: 5,321.0997'East: 5,216.5398' Segment# 5: Line Course: S53° 41' 22"W Length: 35.38' North: 5,300.1491'East: 5,188.0300' Segment# 6: Line Parcel Name: Parcel 2 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0540'East: 5,109.7850' Perimeter: 405.12'Area: 7,870Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0062 Course: N53° 17' 38"W Error North : 0.00368 East: -0.00494 Precision 1: 65,340.32 North:5,300.1462'East:5,188.0341' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 41' 22"E Length: 35.38' North: 5,321.0969'East: 5,216.5440' Segment# 2: Line Course: N36° 14' 31"W Length: 40.78' North: 5,353.9871'East: 5,192.4350' Segment# 3: Line Course: N53° 10' 22"E Length: 33.96' North: 5,374.3428'East: 5,219.6182' Segment# 4: Line Course: S37° 25' 01"E Length: 41.10' North: 5,341.6998'East: 5,244.5910' Segment# 5: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6577'East: 5,305.3821' Segment# 6: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2448'East: 5,298.5540' End North: 5,231.0821'East: 5,260.0501' Segment# 7: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6879'East: 5,243.6859' End North: 5,222.0077'East: 5,253.7780' Segment# 8: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3923'East: 5,248.8772' Segment# 9: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' Parcel Name: Sewer easement - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False North: 5,300.1497'East: 5,188.0382' Perimeter: 431.29'Area: 8,067Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0054 Course: N49° 46' 34"E Error North : 0.00348 East: 0.00411 Precision 1: 79,866.67 North:5,231.0822'East:5,260.0472' Segment# 1: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6880'East: 5,243.6830' End North: 5,222.0078'East: 5,253.7751' Segment# 2: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3924'East: 5,248.8743' Segment# 3: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 32.50' North: 5,244.4656'East: 5,229.4722' Parcel Name: Ties - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Segment# 4: Line Course: N88° 48' 13"E Length: 37.88' North: 5,245.2565'East: 5,267.3440' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 16.05'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 22°59'05"Tangent: 8.13' Chord: 15.94'Course: S27° 12' 44"W Course In: S51° 17' 44"E Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2443'East: 5,298.5593' End North: 5,231.0816'East: 5,260.0553' Perimeter: 103.75'Area: 544Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0082 Course: S86° 01' 56"E Error North : -0.00057 East: 0.00816 Precision 1: 12,652.44 North:5,000.0000'East:5,000.0000' Segment# 1: Line Course: N78° 28' 32"W Length: 1,567.59' North: 5,313.1825'East: 3,464.0133' Segment# 2: Line Course: S86° 57' 36"E Length: 1,787.37' North: 5,218.3927'East: 5,248.8680' Segment# 3: Line Course: S48° 43' 56"W Length: 331.11' North: 4,999.9995'East: 4,999.9941' Perimeter: 3,686.07'Area: 206,693Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0059 Course: S85° 01' 23"W Error North : -0.00051 East: -0.00589 Precision 1: 624,757.63 43 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, August 15, 2025 2:00 PM To:Dadala, Hephzibah Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Attachments:00. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Transmittal.pdf; 01. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Map Check #1 Responses.pdf; 02. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Parcel Map SLO 24-0045.pdf; 03. 25.08.15 FMAP-0167-2025 Updated Closure Calcuations.pdf; Mail Attachment.ics Hi Hepzi, Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend! Here is the re-submittal package for PM SLO 24-0045. Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jul 14, 2025, at 4:28 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Yes that still works, see you Wednesday! Thanks, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org 44 T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications _____________________________________________ From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 4:24 PM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Subject: Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Awesome, thank you! I still want to meet you, so I will probably stop by a little after 10am Wednesday anyways, assuming that is ok? Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jul 14, 2025, at 4:22 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Yep, that’s my understanding! Thanks, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 45 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 4:18 PM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Subject: Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Hi Hepzi, Thank you for explaining for me further. Would I be correct to conclude that we are ok to re-submit the Parcel Map with the updated lot line concept so long as MBS addresses the difference in lot line lengths & total area of the parent parcel? Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jul 14, 2025, at 4:00 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for the background info! The first sentence is mainly just to note that the lot lines were changed, which is ok. The main issue that Engineering Comment #3 is intended to focus on is that the totals for Parcel 1 + Parcel 2 between the TPM and the PM do not match. Hopefully the following provides more clarification, but if not, please feel free to swing by Wed at 10am 뇤눎눐눑눒눏 Approved tentative parcel map: <image001.png> Submitted parcel map: <image002.png> 46 Thanks, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image003.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png ><image008.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 3:27 PM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> Subject: Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Hi Hepzi, Thanks for reviewing the parcel map for us, I have MBS working on the corrections right now. Would there be a good time for me to come in to meet with you, Tuesday or Wednesday this week, to discuss Engineering Comment #3? Subsequent to approval of the TPM, the owner and architect decided on a somewhat revised alignment for the new property line, to allow for more efficient use of the resulting parcels. We reached out to Steve LaChaine about the change and Steve gave us the go-ahead, prior to submitting the Parcel Map (email discussion enclosed). Steve also mentioned that he was leaving the City to take a position with Lea & Braze and so I imagine it is possible that the above information wasn’t passed on to anyone. In any case, the resulting parcels are in substantial conformance with the approved TPM because the number of parcels has not changed and the change brings them closer to 50:50 (and per SB-9, TPM approval is ministerial/ staff level anyways). I can be pretty flexible on times, please let me know what would work best for you so I can stop by to meet you and discuss further. Have a great day! 47 Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jul 9, 2025, at 3:20 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: Hello, Please see attached for FMAP-0167-2025 comments and redlines. The portal has also been updated with these review files. Feel free to reach out with any questions, thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications <sheet 1 markup.pdf><sheet 2 markup.pdf><FMAP- 0167-2025_Review1.pdf> TRANSMITTAL Date: August 15, 2025 To: Hepzi Dadala, Engineering I City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805-781-7575 HDadala@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 (FMAP-0167-2025) Map Check #1 Re-Submittal Dear Ms. Dadala, Please ﬁnd the following documents enclosed for processing: 1.Map Check #1 Responses 2.Updated Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 3.Updated Closure Calculations Package Please kindly let me know of any assistance or additional information I can provide in support of the City’s review and acceptance of the Parcel Map for recordation. Sincerely, Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting cc: Paul Hatalsky, Property Owner Final Map Review #1 Project Address 1364 San Marcos Project Name SB-9 Urban Lot Split - Senate Bill 9 SB9 Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Application Number FMAP-0167-2025 Planning Ethan Estrada (805) 781-7576 | ejestrad@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft affidavit of intent to owner occupy is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Engineering Hephzibah Dadala (805) 781-7575 | hdadala@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. See technical comments on “1st Surveying map check” redlines provided by Surveying. 2. Update the City Engineer’s Statement and PE License to #87574 for the current Supervising Civil Engineer. 3. Lot lines do not match from approved tentative parcel map and parcel map submitted. Make combined square footage of Parcel 1 and 2 on final and tentative parcel map match. Currently, total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the final parcel map is 15933 SF and total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the approved tentative parcel map is 15908 SF. 4. Correct the spelling of “OBISPO”, currently spelled “IN THE CITY OF OBIPSO”, in the parcel map description at the bottom right corner of both sheets 1 and 2. 25.08.15 Map Check #1 Responses from Applicant Applicant will provide a copy of the original recorded affidavit with the mylars. Redline comments have been addressed with the updated Parcel Map and Closure Calculations (MBS has gone back out and located the “missing monuments” along the Northerly and Southerly lines of the parent parcel). City Engineer’s Statement has been Updated as requested. Spelling of “Obispo” has been corrected on both sheets. (See Response Below) * Engineering Comment #3 Response: Surveyor has gone back out and located the “missing monuments” along the Northerly and Southerly lines of the parent parcel. Please refer to the updated the Map Sheets & Closure Calculations. Page 2 Utilities Shawna Scott (805) 781-7176 | sscott@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft shared private sewer lateral agreement is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Building Sean McCaffrey 805-781-7168 | smccaffr@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. Sean is just on this review to verify shared sewer is okay with the utility's department as i will leave the call to them if for some reason is works out for best interest for everyone. The plumbing code will requi re these to be separated if building has final say on this. (311 CPC). Fire Julianna Hutchinson 805-783-7805 | jhutchin@slocity.org ☒ Ready for Action ☐ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. (comment) Applicant will provide an original copy of the executed shared sewer lateral agreement with the mylars so it can record concurrently with the Parcel Map. Project has been in communication with the Utilities Department regarding the City’s preferred approach to providing future sewerage to Parcel 1, since project inception. Utilities Department indicates that a shared Sewer Lateral is preferred because it results in fewer connections to the public main. Applicant has already conducted rehabilitation of the existing sewer lateral (including provisions for future sewerage to Parcel 1, as requested by the Utilities Department. Applicant will provide an executed original copy of the shared sewer lateral agreement with the mylars (addresses future ownership, maintenance and repair of the shared, private lateral), which will record concurrently with the Parcel Map. PARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045 SAN MARCOS COURTDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2DDDPARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045JOHNSON AVENUE Parcel Map Check Report Date: 8/12/2025 8:53:43 AM Parcel Name: Boundary - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Client:Prepared by: Brian Cowan Preparer: Linda Richardson 24-094 MBS Land Surveys 3559 South Higuera Street North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 132.40' North: 5,341.6984'East: 5,244.5858' Segment# 3: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6564'East: 5,305.3769' Segment# 4: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2435'East: 5,298.5488' End North: 5,231.0807'East: 5,260.0449' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6866'East: 5,243.6807' End North: 5,222.0063'East: 5,253.7728' Segment# 6: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3910'East: 5,248.8721' Segment# 7: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' North: 5,300.1483'East: 5,188.0331' Segment# 8: Line Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0533'East: 5,109.7881' Perimeter: 615.07'Area: 15,950Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0035 Course: N31° 49' 00"W Error North : 0.00295 East: -0.00183 Parcel Name: Parcel 1 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Precision 1: 175,731.43 North:5,407.0503'East:5,109.7899' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 45' 26"E Length: 70.12' North: 5,448.5058'East: 5,166.3430' Segment# 2: Line Course: S36° 13' 30"E Length: 91.54' North: 5,374.6603'East: 5,220.4393' Segment# 3: Line Course: S53° 34' 21"W Length: 34.81' North: 5,353.9899'East: 5,192.4309' Segment# 4: Line Course: S36° 14' 31"E Length: 40.78' North: 5,321.0997'East: 5,216.5398' Segment# 5: Line Course: S53° 41' 22"W Length: 35.38' North: 5,300.1491'East: 5,188.0300' Segment# 6: Line Parcel Name: Parcel 2 - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Course: N36° 12' 03"W Length: 132.48' North: 5,407.0540'East: 5,109.7850' Perimeter: 405.12'Area: 7,870Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0062 Course: N53° 17' 38"W Error North : 0.00368 East: -0.00494 Precision 1: 65,340.32 North:5,300.1462'East:5,188.0341' Segment# 1: Line Course: N53° 41' 22"E Length: 35.38' North: 5,321.0969'East: 5,216.5440' Segment# 2: Line Course: N36° 14' 31"W Length: 40.78' North: 5,353.9871'East: 5,192.4350' Segment# 3: Line Course: N53° 10' 22"E Length: 33.96' North: 5,374.3428'East: 5,219.6182' Segment# 4: Line Course: S37° 25' 01"E Length: 41.10' North: 5,341.6998'East: 5,244.5910' Segment# 5: Line Course: S36° 32' 15"E Length: 102.11' North: 5,259.6577'East: 5,305.3821' Segment# 6: Curve Length: 58.72'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 84°06'32"Tangent: 36.09' Chord: 53.59'Course: S57° 46' 27"W Course In: S9° 49' 43"W Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2448'East: 5,298.5540' End North: 5,231.0821'East: 5,260.0501' Segment# 7: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6879'East: 5,243.6859' End North: 5,222.0077'East: 5,253.7780' Segment# 8: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3923'East: 5,248.8772' Segment# 9: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 101.91' Parcel Name: Sewer easement - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False North: 5,300.1497'East: 5,188.0382' Perimeter: 431.29'Area: 8,067Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0054 Course: N49° 46' 34"E Error North : 0.00348 East: 0.00411 Precision 1: 79,866.67 North:5,231.0822'East:5,260.0472' Segment# 1: Curve Length: 11.23'Radius: 17.00' Delta: 37°51'49"Tangent: 5.83' Chord: 11.03'Course: S34° 39' 05"W Course In: N74° 16' 49"W Course Out: S36° 25' 00"E RP North: 5,235.6880'East: 5,243.6830' End North: 5,222.0078'East: 5,253.7751' Segment# 2: Line Course: S53° 35' 00"W Length: 6.09' North: 5,218.3924'East: 5,248.8743' Segment# 3: Line Course: N36° 39' 16"W Length: 32.50' North: 5,244.4656'East: 5,229.4722' Parcel Name: Ties - Property : 1 Description: Process segment order counterclockwise: False Enable mapcheck across chord: False Segment# 4: Line Course: N88° 48' 13"E Length: 37.88' North: 5,245.2565'East: 5,267.3440' Segment# 5: Curve Length: 16.05'Radius: 40.00' Delta: 22°59'05"Tangent: 8.13' Chord: 15.94'Course: S27° 12' 44"W Course In: S51° 17' 44"E Course Out: N74° 16' 49"W RP North: 5,220.2443'East: 5,298.5593' End North: 5,231.0816'East: 5,260.0553' Perimeter: 103.75'Area: 544Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0082 Course: S86° 01' 56"E Error North : -0.00057 East: 0.00816 Precision 1: 12,652.44 North:5,000.0000'East:5,000.0000' Segment# 1: Line Course: N78° 28' 32"W Length: 1,567.59' North: 5,313.1825'East: 3,464.0133' Segment# 2: Line Course: S86° 57' 36"E Length: 1,787.37' North: 5,218.3927'East: 5,248.8680' Segment# 3: Line Course: S48° 43' 56"W Length: 331.11' North: 4,999.9995'East: 4,999.9941' Perimeter: 3,686.07'Area: 206,693Sq.Ft. Error Closure: 0.0059 Course: S85° 01' 23"W Error North : -0.00051 East: -0.00589 Precision 1: 624,757.63 48 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Tuesday, July 15, 2025 7:28 AM To:Savage, Melissa Subject:FW: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Attachments:sheet 1 markup.pdf; sheet 2 markup.pdf; FMAP-0167-2025_Review1.pdf how I sent over the redlines and comments to all contacts listed ~ From: Dadala, Hephzibah Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2025 3:20 PM To: briancowen@mac.com; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com; hatalsky@sbcglobal.net Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Hello, Please see attached for FMAP-0167-2025 comments and redlines. The portal has also been updated with these review files. Feel free to reach out with any questions, thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Final Map Review #1 Project Address 1364 San Marcos Project Name SB-9 Urban Lot Split - Senate Bill 9 SB9 Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Application Number FMAP-0167-2025 Planning Ethan Estrada (805) 781-7576 | ejestrad@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft affidavit of intent to owner occupy is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Engineering Hephzibah Dadala (805) 781-7575 | hdadala@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. See technical comments on “1st Surveying map check” redlines provided by Surveying. 2. Update the City Engineer’s Statement and PE License to #87574 for the current Supervising Civil Engineer. 3. Lot lines do not match from approved tentative parcel map and parcel map submitted. Make combined square footage of Parcel 1 and 2 on final and tentative parcel map match. Currently, total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the final parcel map is 15933 SF and total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the approved tentative parcel map is 15908 SF. 4. Correct the spelling of “OBISPO”, currently spelled “IN THE CITY OF OBIPSO”, in the parcel map description at the bottom right corner of both sheets 1 and 2. Page 2 Utilities Shawna Scott (805) 781-7176 | sscott@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft shared private sewer lateral agreement is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Building Sean McCaffrey 805-781-7168 | smccaffr@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. Sean is just on this review to verify shared sewer is okay with the utility's department as i will leave the call to them if for some reason is works out for best interest for everyone. The plumbing code will requi re these to be separated if building has final say on this. (311 CPC). Fire Julianna Hutchinson 805-783-7805 | jhutchin@slocity.org ☒ Ready for Action ☐ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. (comment) 49 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, July 14, 2025 3:27 PM To:Dadala, Hephzibah Subject:Re: FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Attachments:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance.eml Hi Hepzi, Thanks for reviewing the parcel map for us, I have MBS working on the corrections right now. Would there be a good time for me to come in to meet with you, Tuesday or Wednesday this week, to discuss Engineering Comment #3? Subsequent to approval of the TPM, the owner and architect decided on a somewhat revised alignment for the new property line, to allow for more efficient use of the resulting parcels. We reached out to Steve LaChaine about the change and Steve gave us the go-ahead, prior to submitting the Parcel Map (email discussion enclosed). Steve also mentioned that he was leaving the City to take a position with Lea & Braze and so I imagine it is possible that the above information wasn’t passed on to anyone. In any case, the resulting parcels are in substantial conformance with the approved TPM because the number of parcels has not changed and the change brings them closer to 50:50 (and per SB-9, TPM approval is ministerial/ staff level anyways). I can be pretty flexible on times, please let me know what would work best for you so I can stop by to meet you and discuss further. Have a great day! Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jul 9, 2025, at 3:20 PM, Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org> wrote: 50 Hello, Please see attached for FMAP-0167-2025 comments and redlines. The portal has also been updated with these review files. Feel free to reach out with any questions, thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications <sheet 1 markup.pdf><sheet 2 markup.pdf><FMAP-0167-2025_Review1.pdf> 1 From:La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 1:14 PM To:Brian Cowen Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; Estrada, Ethan Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Since these are ministerial review and you are making it about 50/50 separation, then I think it is fine to move ahead. Thanks for checking. Steve From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 12:00 PM To: La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Thanks Steve, are we ok to move forward with the new property line alignment or should we wait until you have had an opportunity to talk to Planning? Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:31 AM, La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> wrote: I see the access on other side now, never mind the access concern. Steve From: La Chaine, Steve Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Brian, We allow up to the 3 lines and it looks fine enough to me. I am more concerned about how the Parcel 1 gets their access (10’ wide minimum easement across parcel 2) than I am with the rear yard lot line revision. I will try to talk to planning by April 2nd on this. Ethan is out today, and I am out tomorrow. Thanks. Steve 2 From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:02 AM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan and Steve, I’ll defer to you two on the question below. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 2:49 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan/ Matt, Hope you guys had a great weekend! The Owner and Architect have indicated they want the new property line to follow a slightly different alignment than what was depicted on the TPM. Would the City be open viewing the change as being in “substantial conformance” with the approved TPM? It does bring the sizes of the resulting parcels closer to 50:50... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 3 <image007.png> On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635732487326300 000. I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian 4 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 51 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 3:20 PM To:briancowen@mac.com; kmargason@mbslandsurveys.com; hatalsky@sbcglobal.net Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:FMAP-0167-2025 Routing #1 - comments and redlines Attachments:sheet 1 markup.pdf; sheet 2 markup.pdf; FMAP-0167-2025_Review1.pdf Hello, Please see attached for FMAP-0167-2025 comments and redlines. The portal has also been updated with these review files. Feel free to reach out with any questions, thanks! Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications Final Map Review #1 Project Address 1364 San Marcos Project Name SB-9 Urban Lot Split - Senate Bill 9 SB9 Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Application Number FMAP-0167-2025 Planning Ethan Estrada (805) 781-7576 | ejestrad@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft affidavit of intent to owner occupy is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Engineering Hephzibah Dadala (805) 781-7575 | hdadala@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. See technical comments on “1st Surveying map check” redlines provided by Surveying. 2. Update the City Engineer’s Statement and PE License to #87574 for the current Supervising Civil Engineer. 3. Lot lines do not match from approved tentative parcel map and parcel map submitted. Make combined square footage of Parcel 1 and 2 on final and tentative parcel map match. Currently, total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the final parcel map is 15933 SF and total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the approved tentative parcel map is 15908 SF. 4. Correct the spelling of “OBISPO”, currently spelled “IN THE CITY OF OBIPSO”, in the parcel map description at the bottom right corner of both sheets 1 and 2. Page 2 Utilities Shawna Scott (805) 781-7176 | sscott@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. The language provided in the draft shared private sewer lateral agreement is acceptable. Please provide a recorded agreement. Building Sean McCaffrey 805-781-7168 | smccaffr@slocity.org ☐ Ready for Action ☒ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. Sean is just on this review to verify shared sewer is okay with the utility's department as i will leave the call to them if for some reason is works out for best interest for everyone. The plumbing code will requi re these to be separated if building has final say on this. (311 CPC). Fire Julianna Hutchinson 805-783-7805 | jhutchin@slocity.org ☒ Ready for Action ☐ Needs Resubmit (see below) On review of the proposed plans, the following comments are provided: 1. (comment) 52 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Thursday, July 3, 2025 11:23 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt; McCaffrey, Seano; Dadala, Hephzibah; Estrada, Ethan; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi Matt, I completed my review. The draft shared sewer lateral agreement looks good – they just need to provide a recorded agreement then I can sign off. Thank you, Shawna From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:35 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi all, This was routed with a due date of today, 7/2/2025. I told the applicant we anticipate comments might be available by 7/9/2025. Please complete your review by then or let me know your anticipated completion date. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 53 From:Dadala, Hephzibah Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 11:09 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Savage, Melissa; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel Subject:RE: Hepzi and Melissa, please update Planning comments/status as necessary - FMAP-0167-2025 and FMAP-0316-2025 Will do, thanks for following up Matt! Thanks, Hephzibah (Hepzi) Dadala pronouns she/her/hers Engineer I Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E HDadala@slocity.org T 805.781.7575 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 11:07 AM To: Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Cc: Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Hepzi and Melissa, please update Planning comments/status as necessary - FMAP-0167-2025 and FMAP-0316-2025 Hi Hepzi and Melissa, Could you please update these cases, as needed? Please reference Ethan’s email below. FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary FMAP-0316-2025 (1203 Buchon St San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/6c0473f6-272f-4161-a296-93ad89a4927a/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III 54 Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 10:51 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Good morning, I completed my review for FMAP-0316-2025 and had no comments. For FMAP-0167-2025, I do have a comment but am unable to edit the comments sheet in Energov (I have a ticket in with IT to hopefully fix this soon). In the meantime, below is what I need from the applicant:  The provided draft affidavit is sufficient – please submit a signed and notarized version of the affidavit. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:35 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi all, 55 This was routed with a due date of today, 7/2/2025. I told the applicant we anticipate comments might be available by 7/9/2025. Please complete your review by then or let me know your anticipated completion date. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 56 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 11:01 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Thank you, Ethan! Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 10:51 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Good morning, I completed my review for FMAP-0316-2025 and had no comments. For FMAP-0167-2025, I do have a comment but am unable to edit the comments sheet in Energov (I have a ticket in with IT to hopefully fix this soon). In the meantime, below is what I need from the applicant:  The provided draft affidavit is sufficient – please submit a signed and notarized version of the affidavit. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org 57 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:35 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Dadala, Hephzibah <HDadala@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org>; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel <GMunoz@slocity.org>; Savage, Melissa <msavage@slocity.org> Subject: Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Hi all, This was routed with a due date of today, 7/2/2025. I told the applicant we anticipate comments might be available by 7/9/2025. Please complete your review by then or let me know your anticipated completion date. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 58 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:43 AM To:McCaffrey, Seano; Savage, Melissa; Hutchinson, Julianna; Estrada, Ethan; Scott, Shawna; Munoz- Morris, Gabriel; Dadala, Hephzibah Subject:Applicant asking status - FMAP-0316-2025 (1203 Buchon St San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Attachments:RE: Map Checks Hi all, This one has a due date of 7/16/2025. The applicant is asking status. I told him I anticipate we’ll be close to the due date on this one. Please complete by then or let me know your anticipated review time. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/6c0473f6-272f-4161-a296-93ad89a4927a/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:30 AM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Map Checks Hi Brian, Thank you for your understanding. The technical reviews have been completed for both of those maps. We are still waiting on other reviewing departments. I will send reminders to the reviewers. 1364 San Marcos had an initial due date of today; I anticipate comments might be available in about a week. 1203 Buchon has a due date of 7/16/2025, and I anticipate comments should be available close to that due date. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 7:57 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Map Checks Hey Matt, Just wanted to check in on status of the Toro/ Buchon and San Marcos Court map checks. Between summer vacations and Steve leaving the City, it would be understandable if things are taking a little longer than usual... Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer 2 San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 59 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:35 AM To:McCaffrey, Seano; Dadala, Hephzibah; Estrada, Ethan; Scott, Shawna; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:Applicant asking status - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Attachments:RE: Map Checks Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi all, This was routed with a due date of today, 7/2/2025. I told the applicant we anticipate comments might be available by 7/9/2025. Please complete your review by then or let me know your anticipated completion date. https://eplapp1.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/007c4fa0-eb6c-47e9-aaed-bb63e4c41ee4/summary Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, July 2, 2025 8:30 AM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Map Checks Hi Brian, Thank you for your understanding. The technical reviews have been completed for both of those maps. We are still waiting on other reviewing departments. I will send reminders to the reviewers. 1364 San Marcos had an initial due date of today; I anticipate comments might be available in about a week. 1203 Buchon has a due date of 7/16/2025, and I anticipate comments should be available close to that due date. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2025 7:57 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Map Checks Hey Matt, Just wanted to check in on status of the Toro/ Buchon and San Marcos Court map checks. Between summer vacations and Steve leaving the City, it would be understandable if things are taking a little longer than usual... Thanks, Brian Cowen Consulting, Inc. Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer 2 San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 60 From:Holt, Timothy Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 1:04 PM To:Accounts Payable Subject:FW: Sewer Lateral Rebate Application Approved Attachments:Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program - Paul Hatalsky.pdf Hello Accounts Payable, I hope this email finds you well. Please queue this Sewer Lateral Rebate in line for payment processing. Thank you, Timothy Holt Financial Specialist Finance 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3668 E tholt@slocity.org T 805.781.7448 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: noreply@slocity.org <noreply@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2025 1:07 PM To: Holt, Timothy <tholt@slocity.org>; Done, Katie <kdone@slocity.org> Subject: Sewer Lateral Rebate Application Approved A Sewer Lateral Rebate form has been approved by Utilities and is ready to be entered as a supplier and processed for payment. Supplier and W9 information can be found in Laserfiche here: \Utilities\Sewer Lateral Rebate\Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program Please read all of the information about this program on the Information tab, including rebate eligibility requirements and procedure. If you have questions regarding the City's Private Sewer Lateral Program, please call the Utilities Department at (805) 781-7215 or email at lateralrebates@slocity.org. Property Owner Information All fields are required Property Owner's Name Paul Hatalsky Mailing Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Phone Number E-mail W-9 Tax Form * IRS_Form_W-9_Paul_Hatalsky_final.pdf 242.5KB Property Information All fields are required City Permit Number ENCR-1010-2025 Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 004-782-081 Property Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Contractor's Name Contractor's Phone Number Paul Hatalsky$4000602.9501.710062001024 Action Rooter Construction Method (trenchless, open trench, etc.) Trenchless Pipe Type ABS HDPE PVC Total Lateral Replacement Cost $16,945.00 *Lateral replacement must include new connection to City main. Reusing an existing connection or partial lateral replacement will not qualify for a rebate. Rebate amount will not exceed the total lateral replacement cost; copies of receipts must be provided with application to verify total replacement cost. Receipts Action_Rooter_2025_05.pdf 94.17KB Action_Rooter_Receipt_2025_05.pdf 63.73KB Confirmation Electronic Signature * I have read, understand, and agree to the terms and conditions as stated above and on the Information tab Reason for rejection Permit Doc Missing Funding Submission Date 2025-05-23 61 From:noreply@slocity.org Sent:Monday, June 2, 2025 1:07 PM To:Holt, Timothy; Done, Katie Subject:Sewer Lateral Rebate Application Approved Attachments:Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program.pdf A Sewer Lateral Rebate form has been approved by Utilities and is ready to be entered as a supplier and processed for payment. Supplier and W9 information can be found in Laserfiche here: \Utilities\Sewer Lateral Rebate\Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program Please read all of the information about this program on the Information tab, including rebate eligibility requirements and procedure. If you have questions regarding the City's Private Sewer Lateral Program, please call the Utilities Department at (805) 781-7215 or email at lateralrebates@slocity.org. Property Owner Information All fields are required Property Owner's Name Paul Hatalsky Mailing Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Phone Number E-mail W-9 Tax Form * IRS_Form_W-9_Paul_Hatalsky_final.pdf 242.5KB Property Information All fields are required City Permit Number ENCR-1010-2025 Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 004-782-081 Property Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Contractor's Name Contractor's Phone Number Action Rooter Construction Method (trenchless, open trench, etc.) Trenchless Pipe Type ABS HDPE PVC Total Lateral Replacement Cost $16,945.00 *Lateral replacement must include new connection to City main. Reusing an existing connection or partial lateral replacement will not qualify for a rebate. Rebate amount will not exceed the total lateral replacement cost; copies of receipts must be provided with application to verify total replacement cost. Receipts Action_Rooter_2025_05.pdf 94.17KB Action_Rooter_Receipt_2025_05.pdf 63.73KB Confirmation Electronic Signature * I have read, understand, and agree to the terms and conditions as stated above and on the Information tab Reason for rejection Permit Doc Missing Funding Submission Date 2025-05-23 62 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Thursday, May 29, 2025 8:50 AM To:Doug R Cc:DeGiovanni, Stephanie; Dadala, Hephzibah; La Chaine, Steve; Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; Savage, Melissa Subject:Map for pick-up and review - 1st Submittal - FMAP-0167-2025 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Attachments:25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\05. SLO 24-0045 Approved TPM.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\03. Prelminary Title Report.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\14. Draft SB-9 Owner Occupancy Affidavit.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\10. R4 PM_008_100_ 001.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\02. Parcel Map SLO 24-0045.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\12. Draft Shared Sewer Lateral Agreement.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\09. R3 RS_060_080_001.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\07. R1 PM_012_039 _001.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\13. SBDV-0738-2024 Letter of Compliance.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\01. Submittal Checklist.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\00. Transmittal.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\04. M&R Statement.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\08. R2 PM_041_033_001.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\06. Closure Calculations.pdf; 25.05.26 City Parcel Map Submittal\11. R5 PM_032_073 _001.pdf Hi Doug, A printed version of the attached submittal is available at the counter at 919 Palm Street. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications TRANSMITTAL Date: May 26, 2025 To: Matt LaFreniere, Engineering Technician III City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 805-781-7015 mlafreni@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 (FMAP-0167-2025) Map Check Submittal Dear Mr. LaFreniere, Please ﬁnd the following documents enclosed for processing: 1.Completed Submittal Checklist 2.Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 3.Preliminary Title Report 4.Methods & Reasoning Statement 5.SLO 24-0045 Approved Tentative Parcel Map 6.Closure Calculations 7.R1- 12 PM 39 8.R2- 41 PM 33 9.R3- 60 RS 80 10.R4- 8 PM 100 11.R5- 32 PM 73 12.Draft Shared Sewer Lateral Agreement 13.SBDV-0738-2024 Letter of Compliance 14.Draft SB-9 Owner Occupancy Affidavit Please kindly let me know of any assistance or additional information I can provide in support of the City’s review and acceptance of the Parcel Map for recordation. Sincerely, Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting cc: Paul Hatalsky, Property Owner G:\Reference-Library\Forms-Templates\DevRevForms\Plan - Map Forms and Checklists\Improvements\Map Submittal Checklist.doc FINAL & PARCEL MAP SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Address __________________________________ Tract # ______________ MS # ______________ The following components are required to be included with the first submittal of Final or Parcel Map unless specifically waived or deferred in writing for the specific project by the C ommunity Development Department. INCOMPLETE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REJECTED Check each box to indicate that you have provided the appropriate information. City staff will verify that all information has been included. Applicant City Map check fee: FM____________ PM____________ Amount: ____________ (See Engineering Fee Schedule on slocity.org) 3 Check Prints (more required if there are additional departments with conditions) Title Report (Current preliminary title report w/in 3 mo. covering all properties.) Current Soils Report (per Sec. 66490 of the Subdivision Map Act) Method and Reasoning Statement 3 copies of the approved Tentative Map Closure Calculations Reference Maps Reference Deeds (If applicable) 2 copies of documents to record with map (e.g. CC&R’s; Common Driveway Agreement on City standard form; etc.) Improvement Plans (If required to meet any conditions) Map Condition – Review in writing of status of each condition pertaining to map Owner/Developer Phone number Email Address Engineer Phone number Email Address The Community Development Department reserves the right to reject the submittal package without performing any map or plan checks if any of the required plans or supporting information items are not included with this submittal. I, the undersigned Engineer/Surveyor, do verify that all the items necessary for this project and as checked above are included in the attached submittal. _______________________________________ _____________________ Name (Printed) Date _______________________________________ Engineer’s Seal: Signature 1364 San Marcos Court SBDV-0738-2024 x $10,733.69 $10,733.69 x x x x x x Paul Hatalsky Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting May 26, 2025 n/a n/a n/a FMAP-0167-2025 n/a n/a PARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045 SAN MARCOS COURTDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2DDDPARCEL MAPSLO 24-0045JOHNSON AVENUE CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Countersigned By: Christie Clemons Authorized Officer or Agent Michael J. Nolan, President Attest: Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1234 Monterey Street, Suite 110, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Amendment C Title Officer: Reece Benson Email: rbenson@fnf.com Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB TO:Paul Hatalsky - C/O Development + Land Use Consulting 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Brian Cowen PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES):1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2025 at 07:30 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Parcel Map 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee as to Parcel(s) 1 Easement(s) more fully described below as to Parcel(s) 2 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41' WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 255 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF JOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 4 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2025-2026. 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area:003-000 Tax Identification No.: 004-782-081 Fiscal Year:2024-2025 1st Installment: $4,472.79 Paid 2nd Installment: $4,472.79 Open Exemption:$7,000.00 Land:$461,469.00 Improvements: $354,976.00 Personal Property: $0.00 Bill No.:2024/25 004-782-081 Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 3. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 4. All taxes or assessments approved, levied or enacted by the State, County, Municipality, Township or similar taxing authority, which are not yet due and payable, including but not limited to any retroactive increases in taxes or assessments resulting from any retroactive increase in the valuation of the land by the State, County, Municipality, Township, or other taxing authority. Any possible charges or assessments for water bills, public utilities, code enforcement and sanitary bills which may exist, but have not yet been recorded and/or filed. 5. Any liens or other assessments, bonds, or special district liens including without limitation, Community Facility Districts, that arise by reason of any local, City, Municipal or County Project or Special District. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 5 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: M. N. Goldtree, et ux Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 25, 1941 Recording No.: Book 303, Page 172, of Official Records Affects:The Southwesterly 5 feet of said land 7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable laws, as set forth in the document referred to in the numbered item last above shown. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or trust deed made in good faith and for value. 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Lines of poles and incidental purposes Recording No.: Book 306, Page 150, of Official Records Affects:Southwesterly line 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Purpose:Public utilities Affects:Southwesterly 5 feet of Parcel 1 10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: March 2, 1987 Recording No.: 13935, Book 2958, Page 678, of Official Records Affects:Northwesterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 6 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Reference is made to said document for full particulars 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation and Pacific Bell Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 27, 1989 Recording No.: 50559, Book 3356, Page 600, of Official Records Affects:Southeasterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars 12. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled:Option Agreement Dated:December 29, 1998 Executed by: Frank & Marilee Taylor, "Optionor" and Jerry M. Reiss and Collette Reiss, "Optionee" Recording Date: December 31, 1998 Recording No.: 1998-087987, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Quitclaim of Option Rights recorded on February 14, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008007408, of Official Records. 13. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, husband and wife as community property Purpose:Ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities Recording Date: December 1, 2003 Recording No.: 2003136913, of Official Records Affects:Said land and Re-Recording Date:December 24, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003144641, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:40 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 7 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 and Re-Recording Date:December 31, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003146088, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Assignment of Grant of Easement recorded of November 12, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021075598, of Official Records. 14. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount:$591,000.00 Dated:January 29, 2002 Trustor/Grantor: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man Trustee:Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), solely as nominee for Guaranteed Rate, Inc., a Delaware corporation Loan No.: 203438356 Recording Date: February 3, 2021 Recording No.: 2021008336, of Official Records END OF EXCEPTIONS Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 8 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 NOTES Note 1.Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 2.Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Note 3.Note: The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said Land a Single Family Residence, known as 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California, to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 4.Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note 5.If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6.The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 7.Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: C NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 9 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-25-FSLC-512400177 Note 8.The following Exclusion(s) are added to preliminary reports, commitments and will be included as an endorsement in the following policies A.2006 ALTA Owner's Policy (06-17-06). 6.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. B.2006 ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06). 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 9.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. C.ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13) and CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13). 10.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. D.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 12.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 13.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. E.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 7.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the public records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a tribe or on behalf of its members. 8.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage based on the application of a tribe's law resulting from the failure of the insured mortgage to specify state law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the insured mortgage. END OF NOTES Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017 Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 FSLC-512400177 TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation:Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective January 1, 2025 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g., Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); financial account information (e.g., loan or bank account information); biometric data (e.g., fingerprints, retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or other unique biological characteristics; and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; browser version, language, and type; domain name system requests; and browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. To improve our products and services. To prevent and detect fraud; To maintain the security of our systems, tools, accounts, and applications; To verify and authenticate identities and credentials; To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. State-Specific Consumer Privacy Information: For additional information about your state-specific consumer privacy rights, to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please follow the link Privacy Request, or email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Certain state privacy laws require that FNF disclose the categories of third parties to which FNF may disclose the Personal Information and Browsing Information listed above. Those categories are: FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Service providers; Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (fnf.com/california-privacy) or call (888) 413-1748. For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginquiries@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For additional information about your Oregon consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710 FNF is the controller of the following businesses registered with the Secretary of State in Oregon: Chicago Title Company of Oregon, Fidelity National Title Company of Oregon, Lawyers Title of Oregon, LoanCare, Ticor, Title Company of Oregon, Western Title & Escrow Company, Chicago Title Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Liberty Title & Escrow, Novare National Settlement Service, Ticor Title Company of California, Exos Valuations, Fidelity & Guaranty Life, Insurance Agency, Fidelity National Home Warranty Company, Fidelity National Management Services, Fidelity Residential Solutions, FNF Insurance Services, FNTG National Record Centers, IPEX, Mission Servicing Residential, National Residential Nominee Services, National Safe Harbor Exchanges, National Title Insurance of New York, NationalLink Valuations, NexAce Corp., ServiceLink Auction, ServiceLink Management Company, ServiceLink Services, ServiceLink Title Company of Oregon, ServiceLink Valuation Solutions, Western Title & Escrow Company For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is Privacy Statement Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Request website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy@fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 (11-09-18) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY (02-04-22) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7 Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: PART I 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (7-01-21) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27. 2. Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You; b. not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to You; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b. in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land. Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21. 5. The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 7. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 8. Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any other subsurface substance. 9. Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a or 27. 10. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws. 8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (07-01-2021) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.] 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. Notice of Available Discounts Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC - Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. FNTC - Fidelity National Title Company FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. FNTCCA - Fidelity National Title Company of California NTINY - National Title Insurance of New York TICOR - Ticor Title Company of California LTC - Lawyer's Title Company SLTC - ServiceLink Title Company Available Discounts CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be forty percent (40%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. DISASTER AREA TRANSACTIONS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC, NTINY) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended), or an Owner's Policy (Standard or Homeowners coverage). To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A. The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B. The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C. The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Notice of Available Discounts (continued) Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.18.25 @ 11:41 AM by DT SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 DISASTER AREA ESCROWS (CTC, CLTC, FNTC, TICOR, LTC) This rate is available for individuals or entities that were victims of a national or state disaster. The rate can be used for a loan or a sale escrow transaction. To qualify for this rate, the applicant must, prior to the closing of the applicable transaction, make a written request, including a statement meeting the following criteria: A. The subject property is in a disaster area declared by the government of the United States or the State of California. B. The subject property was substantially or totally destroyed in the declared disaster. C. The subject property ownership has not changed since the time of the disaster. The rate will be fifty percent (50%) of the applicable rate, and the transaction must be completed within sixty (60) months of the date of the declaration of the disaster. Standard minimum charge applies based upon property type. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. Applies to a single transaction per property. This rate is applicable to the following Zones/Counties: Zone 1.A: Orange County Zone 1.B: Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Zone 2: Los Angeles County Zone 3: Ventura County Zone 10: San Diego County Zone 12: Imperial County If used for a sale transaction, the application of this rate assumes the charge for the Residential Sale Escrow Services (RSES) fee will be split evenly between buyer and seller. As such and regardless of how the calculated applicable RSES will be split between the disaster victim and the other principal, the rate will be applied only to one half (1/2) of the calculated applicable RSES fee, regardless of whether the disaster victim is paying half (1/2) of the RSES fee (as is customary) or paying the entire fee. The rate under this provision will be fifty percent (50%) of disaster victims' one half (1/2) portion only and shall not apply to any portion paid by non-disaster victim. Additional services will be charged at the normal rates. MILITARY DISCOUNT RATE (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) Upon the Company being advised in writing and prior to the closing of the transaction that an active duty, honorably separated, or retired member of the United States Military or Military Reserves or National Guard is acquiring or selling an owner occupied one-to-four family property, the selling owner or acquiring buyer, as applicable, will be entitled to a discount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the otherwise applicable rates such party would be charged for title insurance policies. Minimum charge: Four Hundred Twenty-Five And No/100 Dollars ($425.00) The Company may require proof of eligibility from the parties to the transaction verifying they are entitled to the discount as described. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. MILITARY RATE (SLTC) A discount of twenty percent (20%) off the purchase transaction closing and settlement fee or a discount of One Hundred And No/100 Dollars ($100.00) off the refinance closing and settlement fee, will be applied when the loan is guaranteed by the United States Veterans Administration and the escrow fee is being paid by the consumer and is listed as paid by borrower on the Closing Disclosure and final Settlement Statement. SAN MARCOS CTDDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2AUGUSTA STAUGUSTA STJOHNSON AVETENTATIVE PARCELMAP SLO 24-0045 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 DECLARATION ESTABLISHING SHARED SEWER LATERAL AREA USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of Parcels 1 & 2 of Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as recorded in Instrument Number ________________________, in the office of the County recorder of said County; WHEREAS, each of the parcels will utilize a shared sewer lateral to service its individual parcel; and WHEREAS, Declarant intends by this document to execute a shared sewer lateral use and maintenance agreement for the benefit of each of the individual owners of the parcels; and NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that Parcels 1 and 2 inclusive, as shown on Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 shall be held, sold, leased, mortgaged, encumbered, rented, used, occupied, improved and conveyed subject to the following agreement, which shall run with the real property and be binding on Declarants and their successors and assigns, on all parties having or acquiring right, title or interest in or to the described property or any party thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. 1. Owner(s) hereby dedicates an easement for a private sewer over said property, as shown on Parcel Map SLO 24-0045, which is recorded concurrently herewith for the use and benefit of all said lots. 2. Owner(s) and their heirs and assigns hereby agree to comply with the following terms and conditions: a) Will be jointly responsible to maintain and keep in repair the common sewer lateral. Page of 2 3 b) Will repair any portion of said common sewer lateral that is damaged through the intentional or negligent acts of said party, or parties, or his/ her or their licensees and invitees. c) If this agreement is abandoned or dissolved, each lot previously served by the common sewer lateral shall be provided with an individual sewer lateral as required by the City Regulations. 3. The parties agree that this agreement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties in the respective servient estates so created, and that it is a covenant running with the land. ______________________________________ ________________________ Paul Hatalsky, Property Owner Date ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. Page of 3 3 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, ________________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other ofﬁcer completing this certiﬁcate veriﬁes only the identity of the individual who signed the February 24, 2025 Sent via Email Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Brian Cowen 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081) – Urban Lot Split Conformity Review Dear Paul Hatalsky, On February 24, 2025, I reviewed your request to pursue a subdivision (urban lot split) per Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 of an existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court in the Low Density Residential (R-1) Zone. The existing 15,908 square foot lot would be subdivided into two (2) parcels as summarized in the table below. Existing Proposed Length (ft) Width / Street Frontage (ft) Area (sf) Length (ft) Width / Street Frontage (ft) Area (sf) Percentage of Existing Lot Lot 1 234 69 15,908 Parcel 1 91 70 6,418 40.4% Parcel 2 142 69 9,490 59.6% After careful review, the proposed urban lot split is in conformance with applicable requirements in Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 (Urban Lot Splits) and Government Code Section 66411.7, as detailed below: Qualifying Requirements 1.Maximum Number of Dwellings – The proposed urban lot split does not result in more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind on the resulting parcels. This two-unit limitation applies to any combination of primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs). As proposed, the existing single-family residence would be retained on proposed Parcel 2. SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) February 18, 2025 Page 2 2. Hazardous Areas – The proposed urban lot split is not located on any site identified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 65913.4, including, but not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, high or very high fire hazard severity zones, special flood hazard areas, regulatory floodways, and lands identified for conservation or habitat preservation as specifically defined in Government Code Section 65913.4. 3. Historic Properties – The proposed urban lot split is not located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the California Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a historic resource pursuant to the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance. 4. Affordable Housing – The proposed urban lot split does not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. 5. Subsequent Urban Lot Splits – The lot proposed to be subdivided has not been established through a prior urban lot split. 6. Adjacent Urban Lot Splits – The lot proposed to be subdivided (subject lot) is not adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot. 7. Subdivision Map Act – The proposed urban lot split conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including implementation of requirements in Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 (Urban Lot Splits). 8. Lot Size – The proposed urban lot split includes subdivision of an existing lot to create no more than two (2) new lots of approximately equal lot area; provided, that one (1) lot shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original lot proposed for subdivision. Both newly created lots are not smaller than 1,200 square feet in size. 9. Easements – The owners of each newly created parcel shall enter into and record easement agreements with each utility or public-service provider to establish easements sufficient for the provision of public services and facilities to each resulting lot. 10. Required Affidavit – The property owner has agreed to submit a signed and notarized copy of an affidavit to occupy one (1) of the housing units as a result of the lot split as their primary residence for a minimum of three (3) years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split. 11. Rental Term – Rental of any unit created pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 shall be for a term longer than 30 days. SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) February 18, 2025 Page 3 Property Improvement Standards 12.Objective Standards – The proposed urban lot split is consistent with applicable objective zoning standards and objective subdivision standards in the City’s Municipal Code, except as follows: a.Existing access easement serves more than two lots. b.Existing access easement is 19 feet wide, where 20 feet is required. These requested exceptions to standards outlined in 16.15.025 represent the minimum deviation necessary to allow the construction of two units on each resulting parcel and which would not require any of the units to be less than 800 square feet. Additionally, site characteristics provide no other options for design alternatives, such as modifying the footprint, moving lot lines, adding stories, or reducing floor area, to avoid the necessity of the above exceptions. 13.Lot Access – Proposed Parcel 2 has frontage on the public right-of-way of at least 20 feet, and Proposed Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. 14.Lot Line Configurations – The location of property lines for the urban lot split complies with all objective standards as identified in Section 16.18.040 (Location of Lot Lines). In addition, the proposed property lines do not result in a lot width or lot depth of less than 20 feet for any portion of the subdivision. 15.Parking Required – Existing off-street parking for the existing single-family residence on the proposed Parcel 2 shall remain. Owner has agreed to either provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit for any future dwellings proposed on the proposed Parcels 1 & 2, or to enter into an agreement with the City to ensure that a car share vehicle will remain within one block of the parcel in perpetuity, unless and until the owner provides off-street parking or development occurs such that the parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application requirements, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ethan Estrada, Assistant Planner at (805) 781-7576 or ejestrad@slocity.org. Sincerely, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF INTENT TO OWNER OCCUPY 1.On May 26, 2025, I Paul Hatalsky, as the owner of the real property located at 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo California, which is also identified as San Luis Obispo County Assessor’s Parcel Number 004-782-081, and further described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference (hereinafter "the Property"), or my authorized representative, submitted an application to the City of San Luis Obispo for a parcel map to subdivide the Property, pursuant to the procedures outlined in Government Code Section 66411.7. 2.I, as the owner of the Property, intend to occupy one of the existing residences on the Property, as my principal residence and for a period of no less than three (3) years from the date of approval of the parcel map or from the date that the first certificate of occupancy is received for a residence if there are no existing residences on the Property at the time of the parcel map approval. 3.I understand that the Community Development Department of the City of San Luis Obispo may take such lawful action as it deems necessary to verify the veracity of this declaration. I acknowledge that if upon the conclusion of such investigation, the City of San Luis Obispo reasonably believes this declaration is inaccurate or untruthful, it may pursue all available legal remedies. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this affidavit was executed on the ____ of ____________, 20___, at ______________, California. __________________________________ Signature __________________________________ Printed Name 1 2 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the veracity, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of ________________ On [DATE], before me, [NOTARY NAME], Notary Public, personally appeared [APPLICANT NAME], who provide to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subjected to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s) executed the instrument. I certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California, that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature _________________________________ 3 63 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 27, 2025 2:19 PM To:Planning Subject:Addressing Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Good afternoon, We have submitted the 1364 San Marcos Court Parcel Map to Engineering and expect the map to record soon. We plan to move right in to design of a home for the new parcel. In terms of staying organized on our end, it would be extremely helpful for the new parcel to have it’s own address. Does the City have a process for assigning addresses to (or pre-addressing) vacant parcels? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 64 From:noreply@slocity.org Sent:Friday, May 23, 2025 4:24 PM To:Stuckenberg, Serenity Subject:Sewer Lateral Rebate Application - 1364 San Marcos Court Attachments:Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program.pdf; Action_Rooter_2025_05.pdf; Action_Rooter_Receipt_ 2025_05.pdf A new Sewer Lateral Rebate application has been submitted Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court Click here to open this task in Forms. Remit to: Action Rooter 3940 Broad St., suite 7424 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Action Rooter 3940 Broad St., suite 7424 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 +18055411333 Invoices@actionrooterplumbing.com www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com INVOICE BILL TO Brian Cowen INVOICE #3445 DATE 05/20/2025 DUE DATE 06/04/2025 TERMS Net 15 SERVICE ADDRESS 1364 San Marcos ct., SLO DATE ACTIVITY AMOUNT Encroachment PermitWater and Sewer permit. This is an estimate based on our last permit doing the same work, 1 @ $2,000.00 2,000.00 Asphalt Workcut, break, haul, dispose, and replace asphalt for sewer lateral potholes for trenchless pull and for water service trench, 1 @ $2,400.00 2,400.00 Concrete Workcut, break, haul, dispose, and replace 1 panel of concrete that lines up with downhill side of property line, 1 @ $1,250.00 1,250.00 Potholepothole at sewer main and on property at abs to clay connection. If there are any utilities in the sidewalk, there will be an extra charge to expose them., 1 @ $1,750.00 1,750.00 Trenchingtrench for new water service, 1 @ $1,500.00 1,500.00 Hot Taptap water main, 1 @ $350.00 350.00 Sewer Line Replacementpull in new sewer lateral, 1 @ $3,200.00 3,200.00 Backfillbackfill per city specs, 1 @ $1,500.00 1,500.00 Custom Amountcompaction test, 1 @ $200.00 200.00 Plumber Rate 945.00 Remit to: Action Rooter 3940 Broad St., suite 7424 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 DATE ACTIVITY AMOUNT hook up water from main to stub out onto property line. Hook up at sewer main and to abs on property with wye connection for future connection, 7 @ $135.00 partssewer and water parts, 1 @ $1,850.00 1,850.00 BALANCE DUE $16,945.00 Payment receipt You paid $16,945.00 to Action Rooter on 5/20/2025 Invoice no.3445 Invoice amount $16,945.00 Total $16,945.00 Status Paid Payment method Bank Authorization ID Thank you Action Rooter +18055411333 www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com | Invoices@actionrooterplumbing.com 3940 Broad St., suite 7424, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 No additional transfer fees or taxes apply. Intuit Payments Inc (IPI) processes payments as an agent of the business. Payments processed by IPI constitutes payment to the business and satisfies your obligation to pay the business, including in connection with any dispute or case, in law or equity. Money movement services are provided by IPI pursuant to IPI's licenses (NMLS #1098819, https://www.intuit.com/legal/licenses/payment-licenses). IPI is located at 2700 Coast Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, 1-888-536-4801. Private Sewer Lateral Rebate Program Please read all of the information about this program on the Information tab, including rebate eligibility requirements and procedure. If you have questions regarding the City's Private Sewer Lateral Program, please call the Utilities Department at (805) 781-7215 or email at lateralrebates@slocity.org. Property Owner Information All fields are required Property Owner's Name Paul Hatalsky Mailing Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Phone Number W-9 Tax Form * IRS_Form_W-9_Paul_Hatalsky_final.pdf 242.5KB Property Information All fields are required City Permit Number ENCR-1010-2025 Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 004-782-081 Property Address Street Address 1364 San Marcos Court Address Line 2 City San Luis Obispo State/Province/Region CA Postal/Zip Code 93401 Country United States Contractor's Name Contractor's Phone Number Action Rooter Construction Method (trenchless, open trench, etc.) Trenchless Pipe Type ABS HDPE PVC Total Lateral Replacement Cost $16,945.00 *Lateral replacement must include new connection to City main. Reusing an existing connection or partial lateral replacement will not qualify for a rebate. Rebate amount will not exceed the total lateral replacement cost; copies of receipts must be provided with application to verify total replacement cost. Receipts Action_Rooter_2025_05.pdf 94.17KB Action_Rooter_Receipt_2025_05.pdf 63.73KB Confirmation Electronic Signature * I have read, understand, and agree to the terms and conditions as stated above and on the Information tab Reason for rejection Permit Doc Missing Funding Submission Date 2025-05-23 65 From:info@actionrooterplumbing.com Sent:Thursday, May 1, 2025 8:25 AM To:DeGiovanni, Stephanie Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Attachments:ENCR-1010-2025 - Action Rooter - 1364 San Marcos.pdf Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2025, at 8:13 AM, DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, Please sign and email back to me the attached permit page. Thank you, Stephanie DeGiovanni Permit Technician I <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sdegiova@slocity.org T 805.781.7111 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 4:42 PM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit I just paid the invoice. 66 On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 3:46 PM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, We discussed this one with Brian Cowen and the Building Division. We’re okay with proceeding with an encroachment permit. We normally need the work-order when issuing the encroachment permit, but we understand that the building permit might not be ready for quite some time. We’ll include notes on the encroachment permit that the meter will not be able to be set until there is a utility work-order. The attached invoice 00039307 can be paid at: https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/payinvoice. Please send us an email to let us know once the invoice has been paid. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Ok. I’ll contact the owners. Regards, 67 Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 <image007.jpg> "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:48 AM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, I don’t see a building permit or utility work-order for a new water meter. Please obtain a utility work- order from the Building Division at 805-781-7180 or building@slocity.org so we can issue the encroachment permit. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 68 From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 <image007.jpg> "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" <ENCR-1010-2025 - Action Rooter - 1364 San Marcos.pdf> ENCROACHMENT PERMIT Right of Way ENCR-1010-2025Public Works Department • 919 Palm Street • San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 Location:1364 San Marcos Ct USA #: N/A X-streets: Project Name: Augusta Bldg Dept Other permits required: Sewer lateral replacement; new water service Contractor:Action Rooter Steven Foster 805-440-2034 Water: T: 23 B: 0 Sewer: T: 0 B: 35 Description of Work: Replace sewer lateral to the main using trenchless technology. Trenchless lateral replacements require a video submittal to be emailed after replacement. A separate building permit is required for any sewer lateral replacement on private property. Also, install a new 1" water service lateral from the main in the street to the property line. There is no utility work-order for a new water meter at this time; a utility work-order must be obtained from the Building Division (building@slocity.org or 805-781-7180) prior to a new water meter being set. The utility work-order will require a building permit and fees. All work to be done to City Standard Specifications & Engineering Standards. Traffic and pedestrian controls must be per City Appendix G & MUTCD Standards. Call the Public Works inspection hotline at 805-781-7554 two working days prior to the start of work and one working day prior to each subsequent inspection. Permittee is responsible for calling for final inspection so the permit can be closed. Also, please call the Public Works inspection hotline at 805-781-7554 to coordinate wye installation two working days in advance. Frontage Improvements Complete/Upgraded Curb Ramp Complete/Upgraded City Fiber Bus Route Sewer Wye All work performed within the right-of-way shall conform to the City of San Luis Obispo Engineering Standard Details and Standard Specifications. You are responsible for liability for personal injury and / or property damage caused by this work or your failure to do what you are obligated to do. If a claim of such liability is made against the City or any of its departments, officers, or employees, you shall, and hereby agree to, defend and indemnify the City and hold the City harmless from any claims, including costs of defense and attorney fees. All work shall be completed and the right-of-way restored by: December 01, 2025 AGREEMENT: I have read this permit and acknowledge receipt of the City of San Luis Obispo Encroachment Permit General Provisions and ___ pages of attached special conditions which I have read, agree to, and acknowledge as a part of this permit. Signature Date Print Name Issued By Date Final Inspection By Date DEPT. of PUBLIC WORKS The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410. 04/30/2025 0 city of san Luis Obispo Encroachment permit General conditions Authority: Encroachment Permits are issued in accordance with City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, Title 12. Conditions: All encroachment permits for work performed within the public right-of-way shall conform to recognized standards of construction and the requirements and conditions contained in the current City of San Luis Obispo Engineering Standards, Standard Specifications, City Policies and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) for work zones traffic control. The following sections of the Standard Specifications should be reviewed by the Contractor prior to starting work. Additional sections of the Standard Specifications are also applicable dependent upon the type of work and work site conditions. Section 3-1.05A Encroachment Permit Bond Section 3-1.18A Encroachment Permit Section 4-1.02 Intent: Maintain Plans & Current Standards at Jobsite Section 4-1.13 Cleanup & Work Site Maintenance Section 5-1.02A Private Construction Projects Coordination and Interpretation of Plans Section 5-1.02B Encroachment Permit Plans Section 5-1.02C Inspection for Encroachment into Public Right-of-Way Section 5-1.20G City Authorizations and Permits Section 5-1.26 Construction Surveys Section 5-1.36 Property and Facilities Preservation Section 5-1.36E Survey Monuments Section 7-1.03 Public Convenience Section 7-1.04 Public Safety Section 12 Temporary Traffic Control Section 13 Water Pollution Control Section 14-2.03 Archeological Resources Section 15 Existing Facilities Section 77-1.03A(1) Utilities Section 77-1.03A(2) Tree Protection Section 77-1.03C Temporary Paving and Steel Plates Section 77-2.01 Waterlines: Prohibition on Operation of Water System Valves Call the Public Works inspection hotline at (805) 781-7554 two working days prior to the start of work and one working day prior to each subsequent inspection. Permittee understands and agrees that whenever permitted facilities conflict with future City improvements and projects, new construction, reconstruction, or maintenance work in the public right-of-way, said facilities shall be relocated, removed, modified, or adjusted at permittee’s sole expense. By signing the Encroachment Permit I understand and agree to follow the requirements in these Encroachment Permit Conditions. I understand that failure to comply with all the requirements could cause the permit to be revoked and/or cause me to lose my privilege to work within the City right-of–way for 2 years. It is understood and agreed by the permittee that the doing of any work under this permit shall constitute an acceptance of the provisions of this permit and all attachments. Website References: https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development/engineering-development-review/encroachment-permits Water Pollution Prevention Tracking Information Municipal Stormwater BMP E.10.a Compliance Form Water Pollution Control Manager Information Construction Company: Contractor’s License Num.: QSP Num (for SWPPP): Responsible Person: Mailing Address: Office Phone Number: Cell Phone Number: Email Address: Project Information Project Location: Description of Work: Distance to Nearest Creek or Storm Drain: Area of Disturbance Construction Phase (circle one) Off‐Site On‐Site Construction Permit Type (completed by City Staff) ☐ Encroachment Permit Permit Number: ☐ Building Permit Permit Number: ☐ Capital Improvement Plan Spec. Number: Construction Permit Status (completed by City Staff) Date Permit Issued: Estimated Completion Date: Pollution Prevention Plan Type (completed by City Staff) ☐ SWPPP Approval Date: ☐ WPCP (Included with Plans) Approval Date: ☐ WPCP (Minor) Approval Date: Water Pollution Control Plan for Minor Projects Best Management Practices (BMP) BMP to be Implemented Standard Specification BMP Description Good Housekeeping BMPs  Equipment Maintenance 13‐4.03C Maintain, repair, fuel, storage location, inspect vehicles  Stockpile Management 13‐4.03C(3) Cover Stockpile, Place Waddles  Sweeping 13‐4.03F Sweep work area daily and prior to rain events  Spill Management 13‐4.03 Plan and materials for mitigating spills onsite Waste Management BMPs  Saw‐cut Slurry 13‐4.03E(7) Vacuum slurry and contain  Washout 13‐9 Plastic lined washout areas for concrete and tools  Portable toilets 13‐4.03D(4) Provide and ensure secondary containment  Solid waste 5‐1.31 Contain and remove trash from site daily Work Specific BMPs (check and add all that apply) ☐ Creek Protection Controls 13‐10 BMPs and Controls to protect adjacent waterways ☐ Storm Drain Inlet Protection 13‐6 Gravel bags and entrance ☐ Construction Entrance 13‐7 BMPs to eliminate tracking from construction site ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ BMP Maintenance Inspect, Document, Clean & Repair 13‐1.03 Daily maintenance of required BMPs Acknowledgment I have read, understood, and agree to the requirements of: 1. This WPCP 2. City of San Luis Obispo’s Engineering Standard and Specifications 3. State of California’s General Construction Permit I understand and agree that: 1. Additional BMPs may be required during the course of the work to ensure the protection of local water quality 2. You must take corrective actions to protect local water quality 3. Failure to comply with all requirements could cause: a. All construction work to be stopped until compliance is achieved b. Permit to be revoked c. Lose the privilege to work within the City right‐of‐way for 2 years Water Pollution Control Manager Signature Date Water Pollution Control Manager Printed Name Steven Foster 69 From:DeGiovanni, Stephanie Sent:Wednesday, April 30, 2025 8:13 AM To:Steven Foster Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Attachments:ENCR-1010-2025 - Action Rooter - 1364 San Marcos.pdf Hi Steven, Please sign and email back to me the attached permit page. Thank you, Stephanie DeGiovanni Permit Technician I Community Development 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E sdegiova@slocity.org T 805.781.7111 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2025 4:42 PM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit I just paid the invoice. On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 3:46 PM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, We discussed this one with Brian Cowen and the Building Division. We’re okay with proceeding with an encroachment permit. We normally need the work-order when issuing the encroachment permit, but we understand that the building permit might not be ready for quite some time. We’ll include notes on the encroachment permit that the meter will not be able to be set until there is a utility work-order. 70 The attached invoice 00039307 can be paid at: https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/payinvoice. Please send us an email to let us know once the invoice has been paid. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Ok. I’ll contact the owners. Regards, Steven Foster 71 Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:48 AM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, I don’t see a building permit or utility work-order for a new water meter. Please obtain a utility work-order from the Building Division at 805-781-7180 or building@slocity.org so we can issue the encroachment permit. Thank you, 72 Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com 73 Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" 74 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 3:47 PM To:Steven Foster Cc:DeGiovanni, Stephanie Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Attachments:Invoice - 1364 San Marcos.pdf Hi Steven, We discussed this one with Brian Cowen and the Building Division. We’re okay with proceeding with an encroachment permit. We normally need the work-order when issuing the encroachment permit, but we understand that the building permit might not be ready for quite some time. We’ll include notes on the encroachment permit that the meter will not be able to be set until there is a utility work-order. The attached invoice 00039307 can be paid at: https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/payinvoice. Please send us an email to let us know once the invoice has been paid. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Ok. I’ll contact the owners. Regards, Steven Foster 75 Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:48 AM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, I don’t see a building permit or utility work-order for a new water meter. Please obtain a utility work-order from the Building Division at 805-781-7180 or building@slocity.org so we can issue the encroachment permit. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 76 From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" 77 INVOICE (00039307) FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO BILLING CONTACT Steven Foster Action Rooter 3940 Broad St Suite 7424 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE INVOICE DUE DATE INVOICE STATUS INVOICE DESCRIPTION 00039307 04/28/2025 05/28/2025 NONEDue REFERENCE NUMBER FEE NAME TOTAL ENCR-1010-2025 IT Surcharge $51.49 Utilities Excavation $1,688.29 $1,739.78 SUBTOTAL1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 TOTAL $1,739.78 Page 1 of 1April 28, 2025 City of San Luis Obispo 78 From:Building <building@slocity.org> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 10:23 AM To:Nichols, Vanessa Subject:FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // New Water Meter Service Rough-In Attachments:05. SB-9 Tentative Parcel Map 24-0045 (1364 San Marcos Court).pdf Not sure if you need to be included in this, forwarding just in case you do. Ilianna Silva Permit Technician II Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E ISilva@slocity.org T 805.781.7101 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 9:58 AM To: Building <building@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // New Water Meter Service Rough-In Good Morning, My understanding is that I need to request a utility work order to allow for rough-in of a new, future 1” domestic water service to serve the new parcel at the 1364 San Marcos Court property. Tentative approval for the lot split has been approved and the Parcel Map is ready to submit pending replacement of the sewer lateral (per the utilities department) and rough-in of the water service to serve the new parcel. Since we are a long ways out on having building plans for a new house and intend to just rough-in the water service for now (install a blank in the meter vault and sleeve to the back of sidewalk). We will plan to request the actual meter set later on, when the building plans have been approved, and development fees have been paid. I understand that Steven with Action Rooter is in the process of obtaining the encroachment permit and is scheduled to mobilize and start the work this week. Please advise on next steps... 79 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 SAN MARCOS CTDDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2AUGUSTA STAUGUSTA STJOHNSON AVETENTATIVE PARCELMAP SLO 24-0045 80 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 9:58 AM To:Building Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:1364 San Marcos Court // New Water Meter Service Rough-In Attachments:05. SB-9 Tentative Parcel Map 24-0045 (1364 San Marcos Court).pdf Categories:Vanessa Good Morning, My understanding is that I need to request a utility work order to allow for rough-in of a new, future 1” domestic water service to serve the new parcel at the 1364 San Marcos Court property. Tentative approval for the lot split has been approved and the Parcel Map is ready to submit pending replacement of the sewer lateral (per the utilities department) and rough-in of the water service to serve the new parcel. Since we are a long ways out on having building plans for a new house and intend to just rough-in the water service for now (install a blank in the meter vault and sleeve to the back of sidewalk). We will plan to request the actual meter set later on, when the building plans have been approved, and development fees have been paid. I understand that Steven with Action Rooter is in the process of obtaining the encroachment permit and is scheduled to mobilize and start the work this week. Please advise on next steps... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 81 From:Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 8:51 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:DeGiovanni, Stephanie Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit I’m not sure there is going to be a building permit on this property because it is for a lot split, but let me find out. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:49 AM Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> wrote: Ok. I’ll contact the owners. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com 82 Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:48 AM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, I don’t see a building permit or utility work-order for a new water meter. Please obtain a utility work-order from the Building Division at 805-781-7180 or building@slocity.org so we can issue the encroachment permit. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos ct permit 83 Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" 84 From:Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 8:49 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:DeGiovanni, Stephanie Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Ok. I’ll contact the owners. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 8:48 AM LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Steven, I don’t see a building permit or utility work-order for a new water meter. Please obtain a utility work-order from the Building Division at 805-781-7180 or building@slocity.org so we can issue the encroachment permit. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his 85 Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; DeGiovanni, Stephanie <sdegiova@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos ct permit Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com 86 Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" 87 From:Steven Foster <info@actionrooterplumbing.com> Sent:Monday, April 28, 2025 6:02 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt; DeGiovanni, Stephanie Subject:1364 San Marcos ct permit Attachments:1364 San Marcos ct. water WPCP.pdf; 1364 San Marcos ct., SLO - wppti.pdf; 1364 San Marcos ct map.pdf Good morning, Here’s another one. Regards, Steven Foster Action Rooter Plumbing Tel: (805) 541-1333 Email: info@ActionRooterPlumbing.com Website: www.ActionRooterPlumbing.com Action Rooter Plumbing - Servicing San Luis Obispo County since 1985 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "A Leader in Trenchless Technology" Water Pollution Control Plan for Minor Projects Best Management Practices (BMP) BMP to be Implemented Standard Specification BMP Description Good Housekeeping BMPs  Equipment Maintenance 13‐4.03C Maintain, repair, fuel, storage location, inspect vehicles  Stockpile Management 13‐4.03C(3) Cover Stockpile, Place Waddles  Sweeping 13‐4.03F Sweep work area daily and prior to rain events  Spill Management 13‐4.03 Plan and materials for mitigating spills onsite Waste Management BMPs  Saw‐cut Slurry 13‐4.03E(7) Vacuum slurry and contain  Washout 13‐9 Plastic lined washout areas for concrete and tools  Portable toilets 13‐4.03D(4) Provide and ensure secondary containment  Solid waste 5‐1.31 Contain and remove trash from site daily Work Specific BMPs (check and add all that apply) ☐ Creek Protection Controls 13‐10 BMPs and Controls to protect adjacent waterways ☐ Storm Drain Inlet Protection 13‐6 Gravel bags and entrance ☐ Construction Entrance 13‐7 BMPs to eliminate tracking from construction site ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ BMP Maintenance Inspect, Document, Clean & Repair 13‐1.03 Daily maintenance of required BMPs Acknowledgment I have read, understood, and agree to the requirements of: 1. This WPCP 2. City of San Luis Obispo’s Engineering Standard and Specifications 3. State of California’s General Construction Permit I understand and agree that: 1. Additional BMPs may be required during the course of the work to ensure the protection of local water quality 2. You must take corrective actions to protect local water quality 3. Failure to comply with all requirements could cause: a. All construction work to be stopped until compliance is achieved b. Permit to be revoked c. Lose the privilege to work within the City right‐of‐way for 2 years Water Pollution Control Manager Signature Date Water Pollution Control Manager Printed Name Steven Foster Water Pollution Prevention Tracking Information Municipal Stormwater BMP E.10.a Compliance Form Water Pollution Control Manager Information Construction Company: Contractor’s License Num.: QSP Num (for SWPPP): Responsible Person: Mailing Address: Office Phone Number: Cell Phone Number: Email Address: Project Information Project Location: Description of Work: Distance to Nearest Creek or Storm Drain: Area of Disturbance Construction Phase (circle one) Off‐Site On‐Site Construction Permit Type (completed by City Staff) ☐ Encroachment Permit Permit Number: ☐ Building Permit Permit Number: ☐ Capital Improvement Plan Spec. Number: Construction Permit Status (completed by City Staff) Date Permit Issued: Estimated Completion Date: Pollution Prevention Plan Type (completed by City Staff) ☐ SWPPP Approval Date: ☐ WPCP (Included with Plans) Approval Date: ☐ WPCP (Minor) Approval Date: 88 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 1:20 PM To:La Chaine, Steve Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Much appreciated. Thank you! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 31, 2025, at 1:13 PM, La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> wrote: Since these are ministerial review and you are making it about 50/50 separation, then I think it is fine to move ahead. Thanks for checking. Steve From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 12:00 PM To: La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Thanks Steve, are we ok to move forward with the new property line alignment or should we wait until you have had an opportunity to talk to Planning? Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 89 On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:31 AM, La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> wrote: I see the access on other side now, never mind the access concern. Steve From: La Chaine, Steve Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Brian, We allow up to the 3 lines and it looks fine enough to me. I am more concerned about how the Parcel 1 gets their access (10’ wide minimum easement across parcel 2) than I am with the rear yard lot line revision. I will try to talk to planning by April 2nd on this. Ethan is out today, and I am out tomorrow. Thanks. Steve From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:02 AM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan and Steve, I’ll defer to you two on the question below. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 90 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 2:49 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan/ Matt, Hope you guys had a great weekend! The Owner and Architect have indicated they want the new property line to follow a slightly different alignment than what was depicted on the TPM. Would the City be open viewing the change as being in “substantial conformance” with the approved TPM? It does bring the sizes of the resulting parcels closer to 50:50... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image007.png> On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635 732487326300000. I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 91 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all 92 applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications 93 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 12:00 PM To:La Chaine, Steve Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Thanks Steve, are we ok to move forward with the new property line alignment or should we wait until you have had an opportunity to talk to Planning? Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:31 AM, La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> wrote: I see the access on other side now, never mind the access concern. Steve From: La Chaine, Steve Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Brian, We allow up to the 3 lines and it looks fine enough to me. I am more concerned about how the Parcel 1 gets their access (10’ wide minimum easement across parcel 2) than I am with the rear yard lot line revision. I will try to talk to planning by April 2nd on this. Ethan is out today, and I am out tomorrow. Thanks. Steve From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:02 AM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan and Steve, 94 I’ll defer to you two on the question below. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 2:49 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan/ Matt, Hope you guys had a great weekend! The Owner and Architect have indicated they want the new property line to follow a slightly different alignment than what was depicted on the TPM. Would the City be open viewing the change as being in “substantial conformance” with the approved TPM? It does bring the sizes of the resulting parcels closer to 50:50... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image007.png> On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, 95 Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635732487326300 000. I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 96 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 97 From:La Chaine, Steve Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 11:31 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt; Brian Cowen; Estrada, Ethan Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance I see the access on other side now, never mind the access concern. Steve From: La Chaine, Steve Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:49 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org>; Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Brian, We allow up to the 3 lines and it looks fine enough to me. I am more concerned about how the Parcel 1 gets their access (10’ wide minimum easement across parcel 2) than I am with the rear yard lot line revision. I will try to talk to planning by April 2nd on this. Ethan is out today, and I am out tomorrow. Thanks. Steve From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:02 AM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan and Steve, I’ll defer to you two on the question below. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 2:49 PM 98 To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan/ Matt, Hope you guys had a great weekend! The Owner and Architect have indicated they want the new property line to follow a slightly different alignment than what was depicted on the TPM. Would the City be open viewing the change as being in “substantial conformance” with the approved TPM? It does bring the sizes of the resulting parcels closer to 50:50... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 99 On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635732487326300000. I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 100 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. 101 For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 102 From:La Chaine, Steve Sent:Monday, March 31, 2025 11:30 AM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Oh sheesh, thanks. Not too hard to see, I just need to wake up. Steve From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 11:22 AM To: La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Steve, Appreciate you taking a look at this. It’s kind of hard to see in the screenshot but access to Parcel 1 is via an existing 19’ wide easement out to Johnson Ave. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 31, 2025, at 8:48 AM, La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, We allow up to the 3 lines and it looks fine enough to me. I am more concerned about how the Parcel 1 gets their access (10’ wide minimum easement across parcel 2) than I am with the rear yard lot line revision. I will try to talk to planning by April 2nd on this. Ethan is out today, and I am out tomorrow. Thanks. Steve From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:02 AM 103 To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan and Steve, I’ll defer to you two on the question below. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 2:49 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Ethan/ Matt, Hope you guys had a great weekend! The Owner and Architect have indicated they want the new property line to follow a slightly different alignment than what was depicted on the TPM. Would the City be open viewing the change as being in “substantial conformance” with the approved TPM? It does bring the sizes of the resulting parcels closer to 50:50... Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image008.png> 104 On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635732487326300 000. I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian 105 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 106 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 3:19 PM To:Scott, Shawna Cc:LaFreniere, Matt; La Chaine, Steve Subject:Re: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Hi Shawna, I will remove the CDD Director from the Signatories. Any thoughts on whether we need to retain the Beneficiary’s Consent? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 25, 2025, at 3:13 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, The agreement language overall looks good. Brian, as this is a private shared sewer lateral agreement you can take the Community Development Director off the signatories. Thank you, Shawna From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 3:05 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Cc: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com>; La Chaine, Steve <slachaine@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Hi Shawna, 107 Would you be able to provide feedback on the attached proposed agreement? This SB-9 map has been through the Planning (SBDV) phase and is pending submittal to Engineering. SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 9:33 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Do you think this will meet the City’s requirements? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 25, 2025, at 8:19 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Thanks Matt, this is really helpful! Brian 108 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 24, 2025, at 2:36 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I have an example recorded agreement attached. I was not able to find a Word document of this. It might have been something the applicant prepared. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png ><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 1:00 PM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Matt, Does the City have a template Shared Lateral Agreement you could share? I received the attached template from MBS but it includes a driveway too. I could update it to remove the driveway but it would be easier if something already existed? 109 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 10, 2025, at 10:57 AM, Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> wrote: Matt, Thanks for your help. Actually Brian Cowen will submit the map so I’m forwarding this to him. Thanks again, Linda From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:56 AM To: Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: RE: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Hi Linda, Attached is invoice 00038679 for the review of the final parcel map. If preferred, this can be paid online at: https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/pa yinvoice. If paying online, please send an email to notify that payment has been made; the online payment system will not notify us. Please submit this application sheet: https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocume nt/7495/635732487326300000 and the checklist items from it in digital form. Please also submit one printed submittal with a full-size printed copy of the map. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 110 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:14 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Matt, Kerry is out of town this week so I am lost. Forgive me if I should send this elsewhere. I need to know the Parcel Map check fee for the attached parcel map so I can request it from the owner. Thanks, Linda <image008.jpg> Linda M. Richardson Land Surveyor 3559 S. Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Office (805) 594-1960 Fax (805) 594-1966 <D-2112 Arpad Soo and Adela Soo Family Trust - Shared sewer lateral and maintenance agreement.pdf> 111 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 3:05 PM To:Scott, Shawna Cc:Brian Cowen; La Chaine, Steve Subject:RE: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Attachments:25.03.25 1364 San Marcos Shared Sewer Agreement.pdf Hi Shawna, Would you be able to provide feedback on the attached proposed agreement? This SB-9 map has been through the Planning (SBDV) phase and is pending submittal to Engineering. SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401) Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 9:33 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Do you think this will meet the City’s requirements? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management 112 CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 25, 2025, at 8:19 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Thanks Matt, this is really helpful! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 24, 2025, at 2:36 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I have an example recorded agreement attached. I was not able to find a Word document of this. It might have been something the applicant prepared. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.p ng> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 1:00 PM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 113 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Does the City have a template Shared Lateral Agreement you could share? I received the attached template from MBS but it includes a driveway too. I could update it to remove the driveway but it would be easier if something already existed? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 10, 2025, at 10:57 AM, Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> wrote: Matt, Thanks for your help. Actually Brian Cowen will submit the map so I’m forwarding this to him. Thanks again, Linda From: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:56 AM To: Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> Subject: RE: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Hi Linda, Attached is invoice 00038679 for the review of the final parcel map. If preferred, this can be paid online at: https://infoslo.slocity.org/EnerGov_Prod/selfservice#/payinvoice. If paying online, please send an email to notify that payment has been made; the online payment system will not notify us. Please submit this application sheet: https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/63573 2487326300000 and the checklist items from it in digital form. Please also submit one printed submittal with a full-size printed copy of the map. 114 Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png ><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Linda Richardson <Linda@mbslandsurveys.com> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:14 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Matt, Kerry is out of town this week so I am lost. Forgive me if I should send this elsewhere. I need to know the Parcel Map check fee for the attached parcel map so I can request it from the owner. Thanks, Linda <image008.jpg> Linda M. Richardson Land Surveyor 3559 S. Higuera Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Office (805) 594-1960 Fax (805) 594-1966 <D-2112 Arpad Soo and Adela Soo Family Trust - Shared sewer lateral and maintenance agreement.pdf> RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 DECLARATION ESTABLISHING SHARED SEWER LATERAL AREA USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of Parcels 1 & 2 of Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as recorded in Instrument Number _________________, in the office of the County recorder of said County; WHEREAS, each of the parcels will utilize a shared sewer lateral to service its individual parcel; and WHEREAS, Declarant intends by this document to execute a shared sewer lateral use and maintenance agreement for the benefit of each of the individual owners of the parcels; and NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares that Parcels 1 and 2 inclusive, as shown on Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 shall be held, sold, leased, mortgaged, encumbered, rented, used, occupied, improved and conveyed subject to the following agreement, which shall run with the real property and be binding on Declarants and their successors and assigns, on all parties have or acquiring right, title or interest in or to the described property or any party thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. 1. Owner(s) hereby dedicates an easement for a private sewer over said property, as shown on Parcel Map SLO 24-0045, which is recorded concurrently herewith for the use and benefit of all said lots. 2. Owner(s) and their heirs and assigns hereby agree to comply with the following terms and conditions: a) Will be jointly responsible to maintain and keep in repair the common sewer lateral. Page of 2 7 b) Will repair any portion of said common sewer lateral that is damaged through the intentional or negligent acts of said party, or parties, or his/ her or their licensees and invitees. c) If this agreement is abandoned or dissolved, each lot previously served by the common sewer lateral shall be provided with an individual sewer lateral as required by the City Regulations. 3. The parties agree that this agreement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties in the respective servient estates so created, and that it is a covenant running with the land. ______________________________________ ________________________ Paul Hatalsky Date City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department By: ___________________________________ _________________________ Timothea Tway Date Community Development Director ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. Page of 3 7 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, ________________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other ofﬁcer completing this certiﬁcate veriﬁes only the identity of the individual who signed the Page of 4 7 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, ________________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other ofﬁcer completing this certiﬁcate veriﬁes only the identity of the individual who signed the Page of 5 7 Beneficiary’s Consent to Grant of Easement and Agreement Guaranteed Rate, Inc. is the Beneficiary under Deed of Trust dated January 29, 2021, recorded February 3, 2021 as Instrument Number 2021-008336 of Official Records, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California. The Deed of Trust encumbers the real property described in the attached "DECLARATION ESTABLISHING SHARED SEWER LATERAL AREA USE AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" (The "Agreement"). As the Beneficiary of said Deed of Trust, Beneficiary hereby consents to the execution and recordation of the Agreement, and agrees that upon recordation of said Agreement, Trustee's and Beneficiary's interests in said real property shall be subordinate to the Agreement. ______________________________________________________________________ Date Beneficiary ______________________________________________________________________ Date Beneficiary ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. Page of 6 7 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, ________________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other ofﬁcer completing this certiﬁcate veriﬁes only the identity of the individual who signed the Page of 7 7 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, ________________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other ofﬁcer completing this certiﬁcate veriﬁes only the identity of the individual who signed the 115 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:24 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Hi Matt, This is very helpful, thank you. Have a great day! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 2:31 PM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please submit one printed copy and a digital submittal of the items on this checklist and the completed checklist:https://www.slocity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/7495/635732487326300000 . I will reply with an invoice for the map review once the submittal is received. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image001.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 116 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org>; LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. 117 Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png> <image005.png> <image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 118 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 12:20 PM To:Estrada, Ethan; LaFreniere, Matt Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 | Letter of Compliance Attachments:SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Ct) - Letter of Compliance.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, This is great news, thank you for all of your work on the project! Hi Matt, I have given MBS the go-ahead to prepare the Parcel Map. Anything I should know, process-wise, as this will be my first time submitting a parcel map to the City for acceptance to record. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Feb 24, 2025, at 8:51 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, This email has been sent to inform you that your application for an urban lot split at 1364 San Marcos Court (APN: 004-782-081) has been found to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 16.15 of the City’s Municipal Code and Government Code Section 66411.7. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. 119 Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications February 24, 2025 Sent via Email Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Brian Cowen 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Court; APN 004-782-081) – Urban Lot Split Conformity Review Dear Paul Hatalsky, On February 24, 2025, I reviewed your request to pursue a subdivision (urban lot split) per Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 of an existing lot at 1364 San Marcos Court in the Low Density Residential (R-1) Zone. The existing 15,908 square foot lot would be subdivided into two (2) parcels as summarized in the table below. Existing Proposed Length (ft) Width / Street Frontage (ft) Area (sf) Length (ft) Width / Street Frontage (ft) Area (sf) Percentage of Existing Lot Lot 1 234 69 15,908 Parcel 1 91 70 6,418 40.4% Parcel 2 142 69 9,490 59.6% After careful review, the proposed urban lot split is in conformance with applicable requirements in Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 (Urban Lot Splits) and Government Code Section 66411.7, as detailed below: Qualifying Requirements 1.Maximum Number of Dwellings – The proposed urban lot split does not result in more than two (2) dwelling units of any kind on the resulting parcels. This two-unit limitation applies to any combination of primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs). As proposed, the existing single-family residence would be retained on proposed Parcel 2. SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) February 18, 2025 Page 2 2. Hazardous Areas – The proposed urban lot split is not located on any site identified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 65913.4, including, but not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, high or very high fire hazard severity zones, special flood hazard areas, regulatory floodways, and lands identified for conservation or habitat preservation as specifically defined in Government Code Section 65913.4. 3. Historic Properties – The proposed urban lot split is not located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the California Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a historic resource pursuant to the City’s Historic Preservation Ordinance. 4. Affordable Housing – The proposed urban lot split does not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. 5. Subsequent Urban Lot Splits – The lot proposed to be subdivided has not been established through a prior urban lot split. 6. Adjacent Urban Lot Splits – The lot proposed to be subdivided (subject lot) is not adjacent to any lot that was established through an urban lot split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot. 7. Subdivision Map Act – The proposed urban lot split conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including implementation of requirements in Municipal Code Chapter 16.15 (Urban Lot Splits). 8. Lot Size – The proposed urban lot split includes subdivision of an existing lot to create no more than two (2) new lots of approximately equal lot area; provided, that one (1) lot shall not be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original lot proposed for subdivision. Both newly created lots are not smaller than 1,200 square feet in size. 9. Easements – The owners of each newly created parcel shall enter into and record easement agreements with each utility or public-service provider to establish easements sufficient for the provision of public services and facilities to each resulting lot. 10. Required Affidavit – The property owner has agreed to submit a signed and notarized copy of an affidavit to occupy one (1) of the housing units as a result of the lot split as their primary residence for a minimum of three (3) years from the date of the approval of the urban lot split. 11. Rental Term – Rental of any unit created pursuant to Government Code Section 66411.7 shall be for a term longer than 30 days. SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) February 18, 2025 Page 3 Property Improvement Standards 12.Objective Standards – The proposed urban lot split is consistent with applicable objective zoning standards and objective subdivision standards in the City’s Municipal Code, except as follows: a.Existing access easement serves more than two lots. b.Existing access easement is 19 feet wide, where 20 feet is required. These requested exceptions to standards outlined in 16.15.025 represent the minimum deviation necessary to allow the construction of two units on each resulting parcel and which would not require any of the units to be less than 800 square feet. Additionally, site characteristics provide no other options for design alternatives, such as modifying the footprint, moving lot lines, adding stories, or reducing floor area, to avoid the necessity of the above exceptions. 13.Lot Access – Proposed Parcel 2 has frontage on the public right-of-way of at least 20 feet, and Proposed Parcel 1 is to be served by an existing access easement. 14.Lot Line Configurations – The location of property lines for the urban lot split complies with all objective standards as identified in Section 16.18.040 (Location of Lot Lines). In addition, the proposed property lines do not result in a lot width or lot depth of less than 20 feet for any portion of the subdivision. 15.Parking Required – Existing off-street parking for the existing single-family residence on the proposed Parcel 2 shall remain. Owner has agreed to either provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit for any future dwellings proposed on the proposed Parcels 1 & 2, or to enter into an agreement with the City to ensure that a car share vehicle will remain within one block of the parcel in perpetuity, unless and until the owner provides off-street parking or development occurs such that the parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code. A Parcel Map application can now be submitted to the Engineering Division. For information regarding the Parcel Map application requirements, please contact Matt LaFreniere, Permit Services Supervisor, at (805) 781-7015 or mlafreni@slocity.org. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ethan Estrada, Assistant Planner at (805) 781-7576 or ejestrad@slocity.org. Sincerely, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 121 From:Daniel, Josh Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 4:27 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Check #2 Ethan, I just commented on the project. They may defer the report till, before building permit issuance. I hope I did it correctly. Josh Daniel Fire Marshal We are ambassadors of safety, advocates for prevention, and stewards of trust. From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:47 AM To: Daniel, Josh <JDaniel@slocity.org> Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Check #2 Good morning, I wanted to reach out regarding SBDV-0738-2024 – this 2nd Completeness Check was originally assigned to Julianna, but it appears to have been reassigned to you. Looking at the applicant’s response the first round of review, it seems the only item that may need your attention is Julianna’s comment requesting that the applicant provide a service report for the dry standpipe, recertifying the system. The applicant has requested to defer this report till prior to building permit issuance. I’m hoping to send our response to the applicant either today or early next Tuesday, as we are coming up to the end of our 30-day review period. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 122 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Saturday, February 1, 2025 2:13 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2025020100147-000 Original Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2025020100147-000_CTYSLO_Original.GML; 2025020100147-000_CTYSLO_Original.XML; 2025020100147-000.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 3006946 TICKET NO= 2025020100147 TICKET REVISION NO= 000 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= SEQUENCE NO= 22597620 TRANSMISSION ID= 1 SUBMITTED DATE= 2025-02-01T14:12:30-08:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2025-02-04T17:01:00-08:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2025-02-04T17:01:00-08:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2025-03-01T23:59:59-08:00 WORK DURATION= 1 day or less EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= Original TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Potholing To Confirm UƟlity LocaƟon(s) DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Hand digging PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 12 to 24 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 51 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= true PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 123 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CTYSLO, PGESLO, SLOUSD, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL, CHASLO [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 148739 NAME= Brian Cowen COMPANY= Cowen ConsulƟng STREET ADDRESS= 1250 Coral Street CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93405 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Homeowner EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-705-2652 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= briancowen@mac.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta Street STREET/SIDEWALK= false SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Brian Cowen ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057052652 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269322 LONGITUDE= -120.643313 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Side Yard PUE TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 124 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 14, 2025 8:40 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 Right on, much appreciated! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 14, 2025, at 8:34 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: This will work! Thank you, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2025 8:29 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. 125 Hi Ethan, Here are the uncompressed files, hope this works! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 14, 2025, at 8:18 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, Thank you for your email. I’m trying to extract the files from the ZIP folder you sent but my computer is telling me that the folder is empty. Do you mind sending these files again? Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 10:55 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Cc: hatalsky@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, 126 Please find the attached resubmittal for the 1364 San Marcos Court lot split. Hope you have a great week! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image007.png> On Dec 9, 2024, at 10:01 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, I hope this email finds you well. Attached is Incomplete Letter #1 for your application, SBDV-0738-2024. Included in this letter is a list of corrections/comments pertaining to your application that require your attention. Updated application materials can be submitted to me via email. As a reminder - upon resubmittal, please include a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on the map and/or other application materials. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications <SBDV-0738-2024_Incomplete Letter 1.pdf> 127 128 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 14, 2025 8:29 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 Attachments:00. Transmittal - Incompleteness Response #1.pdf; 01. Response Narrative- Incompleteness Letter #1.pdf; 02. 1364 San Marcos Court Project Narrative.pdf; 03. 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application.pdf; 04. 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application Checklist.pdf; 05. SB-9 Tentative Parcel Map 24-0045 (1364 San Marcos Court).pdf; 06. 1364 San Marcos Court Preliminary Title Report.pdf; 07. 1364 San Marcos Court Assessor's Parcel Map.PDF This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, Here are the uncompressed files, hope this works! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 14, 2025, at 8:18 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, Thank you for your email. I’m trying to extract the files from the ZIP folder you sent but my computer is telling me that the folder is empty. Do you mind sending these files again? Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 129 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2025 10:55 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Cc: hatalsky@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, Please find the attached resubmittal for the 1364 San Marcos Court lot split. Hope you have a great week! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image007.png> On Dec 9, 2024, at 10:01 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, I hope this email finds you well. Attached is Incomplete Letter #1 for your application, SBDV-0738-2024. Included in this letter is a list of corrections/comments pertaining to your application that require your attention. Updated application materials can be submitted to me via email. As a reminder - upon resubmittal, please include a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on the map and/or other application materials. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> 130 Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications <SBDV-0738-2024_Incomplete Letter 1.pdf> Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 January 13, 2025 Sent Via Email City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department C/O: Ethan Estrada, Assistant Planner 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 Subject: Responses to Incomplete Letter #1 SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos Court) Dear Mr. Estrada: Please ﬁnd the enclosed revisions/ additional information to address the comments/ completeness items identiﬁed in Incomplete Letter #1. 00. Transmittal dated January 13, 2025 01. Response Narrative- Incompleteness Letter #1 02. Project Narrative 03. SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application 04. Application Checklist 05. SB-9 Tentative Parcel Map 24-0045 06. Preliminary Title Report 07. Assessors Parcel Map Sincerely, Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com 12/9/2024 Sent via Email Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Brian Cowen 1250 Coral Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Dear Paul Hatalsky: The Community Development Department (CDD) received your application for an urban lot split on the property located at 1346 San Marcos Court on November 13, 2024. CDD has reviewed your application and found it to be incomplete. CDD is unable to process your application until additional information and/or revisions have been submitted to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Preliminary review is necessary to ensure that staff has adequate information to evaluate your project and identify any conflicts with City standards or guidelines. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a list of items that need to be addressed prior to taking action on your project. Preliminary review indicates that your application will remain in an incomplete status until the following information and/or revisions are submitted: Note: Upon resubmittal, please provide a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on plans. Department comments/completeness items: Planning Division - Community Development Department 1. Project narrative notes that an on-site vehicle turnaround will be provided under a future submittal. This tentative map must include the proposed turnaround required under Section 16.15.025(B)(1)(ii). 2. Show the location of one off-street parking space per existing dwelling unit. 3. Tentative map indicates that a shed near the bottom left corner of the proposed Parcel 2 will be moved. Note where this shed will be moved to and provide distances to nearby parcel lines. 4. Note the name (500-year Flood Zone) and location of the nearby flood hazard zone area on the tentative map. Response Narrative Completeness Review #1 Applicant requests deferral of this item so that the design of the turnaround may coordinate with the design of the future home. Tentative Parcel Map has been revised to show off-street parking for the existing 1364 San Marcos Court dwelling in the driveway. Existing shed is a 120 sf “tuff shed” and not subject to permitting or setback requirements. Tentative Parcel Map has been revised to note the nearby 500-year Flood Zone and to show the location of the nearby flood hazard zone area. SBDV-0738-2024 – Completeness Review #1 12/9/2024 Page 2 5. The symbol legend on the map notes a preliminary title report dated “9-19-2024” in reference to exceptions listed in said title report. The report provided in your application is dated “October 25,2024.” Ensure that the exceptions noted on the map are consistent with the exceptions listed in the title report provided in your application. 6. Note the width of San Marcos Court on the tentative map. If you have any questions on the above planning comments, or any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 805-781-7576, or by e-mail at: ejestrad@slocity.org Engineering Division – Public Works/Community Development Department The Engineering Division does not have comments/completeness items for this application. Upon submittal of new application material(s), comments/completeness items may be provided. If you have questions on the above, please contact Engineering Consultant, Steve La Chaine, 805-781-7201, or by e-mail: slachaine@slocity.org Building and Safety Division - Community Development Department The Building and Safety Division does not have comments/completeness items for this application. Upon submittal of new application material(s), comments/completeness items may be provided. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Plans Examiner, Sean McCaffrey, 805-781-7168, or by e-mail: smccaffrey@slocity.org Utilities Department 7. Show the proposed water and sewer easement on Parcel 2 (front parcel). While the property is currently under sole ownership, there is a potential for one or both lots to be sold without the established required easement. 8. The City’s records show that the existing lateral was inspected in September 2024. The report notes the condition as “poor” due to a break in the lateral. Pursuant to City Municipal Code Section 13.08.395: “h. For events identified in the subsections (C)(1)(a) through (C)(1)(f) of this section [which include subdivision of property], repair or replacement shall be made pursuant to subsection G of this section.” Replacement of the existing sewer lateral will be required prior to recordation of the final map. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Special Projects Manager, Shawna Scott, 805-781-7176, or by e-mail: sscott@slocity.org Fire Department 9. Provide service report for the dry standpipe recertifying the system. 10. New houses on separate lots shall have fire sprinklers tied into a 1” water meter. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Fire Inspector, Julianna M. Hutchinson, 805-783-7805, or by e-mail: jhutchin@slocity.org Tentatitive Parcel Map has been revised to show the date of the title report provided with the application and it has been ensured that the exceptions noted on the map are consistent with the exceptions listed in the title report. Tentative Parcel Map has been revised to include the width of San Marcos Court. OK OK Tentative Parcel Map includes reservations of private water and sewer easements on Parcel 2, (benefitting Parcel 1). Applicant agrees to repair or replace the existing sewer lateral prior to recordation of the final map. Applicant acknowledges that the new house on Parcel 1 will need to include fire sprinklers tied into a 1” meter. Applicant requests deferral of the service report requirement until prior to issuance of the building permit. SBDV-0738-2024 – Completeness Review #1 12/9/2024 Page 3 The above list includes all the items initially identified as necessary for us to certify your application as complete. The City may ask for additional information upon more detailed review of your project. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the specific items necessary to submit for a complete application, please contact me at (805) 781-7576 or ejestrad@slocity.org. Sincerely, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Urban Lot Split Tentative Parcel Map SLO 24-0045 Applicant: Paul Hatalsky Project Representative: Brian Cowen, Cowen Consulting Project Address: 1364 San Marcos Court APN: 004-782-081 Zoning: R-1 (Low-Density Residential) Site Area: 15,908 sf (.365 acres) Application: SLO 24-0045 The project is an Urban Lot Split of an existing 15,908 sf R-1 parcel, pursuant to SB-9. The purpose of the Urban Lot Split is to allow for separate Single-Family Residential use of the rear portion of the large existing property. Location The site is located at 1364 San Marcos Court, between Augusta Street and Johnson Avenue. Existing Parcel Conﬁguration Existing development on the property is a Single-Family Residence, fronting on San Marcos Court. The property beneﬁts from an Existing Vehicle Access Easement over an Existing Common Access Driveway, which connects to Johnson Avenue and also serves three existing residences adjacent to Johnson Avenue. Existing 1364 San Marcos Court Property Proposed Parcel Conﬁguration The project proposes to subdivide the existing 15,908 sf parcel into two parcels: Parcel 1- 6,418 sf. Parcel 2- 9,490 sf. It is noted that both of the resulting parcels exceed the City’s minimum lot size of 6,000 sf for the R-1 Zoning District which is, in any case, not applicable to an SB-9 Urban Lot Split. Qualifying Requirements (City of SLO Municipal Code Section 16.15.020) “A proposed urban lot split must meet all of the following requirements in order to be eligible for an urban lot split under Government Code Section 66411.7.” A.Maximum Number of Dwellings The proposed Urban Lot Split will not result in more than two dwelling units of any kind on each of the resulting parcels. As described by Government Code Section 66411.7(j), the two- unit limitation applies to any combination of primary dwelling units, ADUs, or JADUs. B. Hazardous Areas The proposed Urban Lot Split is not located on any site identiﬁed in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of California Government Code Section 65913.4, unless the development satisﬁes the requirements speciﬁed therein. Such sites include, but are not limited to, prime farmland, wetlands, high or very high ﬁre hazard severity zones, special ﬂood hazard areas, regulatory ﬂoodways, and lands identiﬁed for conservation or habitat preservation as speciﬁcally deﬁned in Government Code Section 65913.4. C. Historic Properties The proposed Urban Lot Split is not located within a historic district or on property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as deﬁned in Section 5020.1 of the California Public Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a historic resource pursuant to the city’s historic preservation ordinance. Page of 2 10 Proposed SB-9 Urban Lot Split D. Affordable Housing The proposed Urban Lot Split does not require the demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income. E. Subsequent Urban Lot Split The lot proposed to be subdivided via an Urban Lot Split was not established through a prior Urban Lot Split. F. Adjacent Urban Lot Splits The lot proposed to be subdivided is not adjacent to any lot that was established through an Urban Lot Split by the owner of the subject lot or by any person acting in concert with the owner of the subject lot. G. Subdivision Map Act The Tentative Parcel Map for this Urban Lot Split was prepared by a California Licensed Land Surveyor and shall therefore conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including implementing requirements in the City’s Municipal Code, except as otherwise provided for by the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. H. Lot Size This Urban Lot Split application subdivides an existing lot to create no more than two new lots of approximately equal lot area and are no smaller than 1,200 sf. Parcel 1- 6,418 sf. (40.4%) Parcel 2- 9,490 sf. (59.6%) I. Utility Easements Parcel 1 Water- Water Service to Parcel 1 will be provided from a new service connection at San Marcos Court via a private waterline, which will pass through the South-Westerly side-yard of the existing 1364 San Marcos Court residence. Sewer- Sewer Service to Parcel 1 will be provided via an existing, shared sewer lateral connection at San Marcos Court and private sewer lateral, which will pass through the South- Westerly side-yard of the existing 1364 San Marcos Court residence. While the locations of future private water and sewer line easements have been identiﬁed on the Tentative Parcel Map, it is not necessary, nor would it be appropriate to record said easements in conjunction with this application, as both parcels are expected to remain under common ownership for the foreseeable future. Page of 3 10 Dry Utilities- Existing Electric, Phone and Cable Television Easements on Proposed Parcel 1 are sufficient to provide for these facilities to the resulting lot. Parcel 2 Parcel 2 will continue to be served by the existing public utility connections from the San Marcos Court public right-of-way. J. Required Affidavit Prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map, the Property Owner has agreed to submit a signed, notarized copy of the Required Affidavit Form, stating that the applicant intends to occupy one of the dwelling units on one of the resulting lots as the applicant’s principal residence for a minimum of three years from the date of approval of the urban lot split. K. Rental Term The applicant agrees that rental of any unit, created pursuant to this Urban Lot Split, will be for a term longer than thirty days. Property Improvement Standards (SLO City Municipal Code Section 16.15.025) A. Objective Standards "Any lot created through an urban lot split shall be subject to the standards and criteria set forth in this section. In addition, except as modiﬁed or provided by this section or state law, any lot created through an urban lot split shall conform to all objective standards applicable to the lot as set forth in this title and/or in an applicable speciﬁc plan or planned unit development ordinance or resolution, along with all applicable objective standards and criteria contained in standard plans and speciﬁcations, policies, codes, regulations, and/or standard conditions duly promulgated and/or adopted by the city.” B. Lot Access “Each resulting lot must have frontage on the public right-of-way of at least twenty feet or be served by an access easement serving no more than two lots. Access shall be provided in compliance with these standards” Proposed Parcel 1 will be accessed from Johnson Avenue via an Existing Vehicle Access Easement/ Common Access Driveway, which presently beneﬁts the 1364 San Marcos Court property in addition to three other residences adjacent to Johnson Avenue. Proposed Parcel 2 has approximately 75’ of existing frontage on San Marcos Court and will retain direct access via the existing drive approach. 1. “Vehicle access easements serving a maximum of two parcels shall meet the following standards” Page of 4 10 The Existing Vehicle Access Easement/ Common Access Driveway to Johnson Avenue presently serves the 1364 San Marcos Court property in addition to three other existing parcels adjacent to Johnson Avenue. While the existing situation does not fully comply with the two-parcel limit, it is an existing situation that is neither exacerbated nor worsened by the proposed Urban Lot Split. i. “Easement width shall be a minimum of twenty feet and shall comply with Engineering Standard 2120 for driveway ramp improvements and widths.” While the existing, Common Access Driveway appears to comply with current Engineering Standards for driveway ramp improvements and widths, the Existing Vehicle Access Easement is 19’ wide and therefor does not fully comply with the 20’ easement width requirement. This minor deviation in easement width was created when Parcel Map SLO 80-121 was recorded for the existing Johnson Avenue development, due to the location of an existing residence on the site (The pole of the ﬂag lot was mapped at 19’ wide to avoid conﬂict with an existing residence). This is an existing situation that is neither exacerbated nor worsened by the proposed Urban Lot Split. Page of 5 10 Existing Vehicle Access Easement ii. “The minimum length for a vehicle access easement is twenty feet. No maximum easement length shall be set. If easement length is more than seventy-ﬁve feet, a vehicle turnaround shall be provided.” The Existing Vehicle Access Easement is 255’ in length. An on-site vehicle turnaround will be provided with the future Building Permit Submittal for the Single-Family Residence on Parcel. The developer of the Johnson Avenue property (Parcel Map SLO 80-121), provided a Fire Department Dry Standpipe System adjacent to the existing Common Access Driveway in lieu of constructing a Fire-Department Turn-Around on-site. In the even of an emergency, Fire Department personnel have the option of staging their equipment at Johnson Avenue and utilizing the existing Fire Department Dry Standpipe System to provide water for ﬁre suppression operations. For this reason, the Fire Department is not required to drive Fire Apparatus on the existing Common Access Driveway and therefor it is not necessary for the Common Access Driveway to be improved to Fire Code Standards, including a Fire Apparatus Turnaround, with this application. Page of 6 10 Existing Common Access Driveway iii. “No residential structure shall be closer than three feet to the easement.” The existing residence at 2675 Johnson Avenue is less than three feet from the Existing Vehicle Access Easement. This is an existing, off-site situation that is neither exacerbated nor worsened by the proposed Urban Lot Split and was, in any case, was previously approved by the City with recordation of Parcel Map SLO 80-121. iv. “Vehicle access easements shall not be located closer than twenty-ﬁve feet to an intersection.” The Existing Shared Driveway complies as it is located approximately 100’ South of the existing intersection of Johnson Avenue and La Vineda Court. 2. “Where a lot does not abut a public street, and where no automobile parking spaces are required under subsection D of this section, a vehicle access easement is not required. An easement providing pedestrian access to a street from each lot shall be provided meeting the following standards: i. Easement width shall be a minimum of ten feet; ii. Pedestrian access easements shall not exceed two hundred feet in length.” This section is not applicable to this application because vehicle access is provided to both of the proposed lots. 3. “Access and provisions for ﬁre protection consistent with the California Fire Code shall be provided for all structures served by an access easement.” The applicant has conducted a “hose-pull analysis” which demonstrates that the distance between the existing hydrant on San Marcos Court and the Existing Dry Standpipe Connection adjacent to the Existing Common Access Driveway is less than 300’. If necessary, during ﬁre-ﬁghting operations, all exterior portions of the exterior ﬁrst ﬂoor of the future residential development will be within 150’ hose reach of either the existing hydrant on San Marcos Court and/ or the Existing Fire Department Dry Standpipe Connection adjacent to the Existing Common Access Driveway. For this reason, the Fire Department will not be required to drive the Fire Apparatus down the Existing Common Access Driveway and therefor it is not necessary for the Driveway to be improved to Fire Code Standards, including a Fire Apparatus Turnaround, with this application. Page of 7 10 4. “Surfacing of easements, pedestrian walkways required within easements, and turnaround dimensions shall meet the requirements of the California Fire Code and the city’s engineering standards.” Due to the existence of the Fire-Department Dry Standpipe System adjacent to the Existing Common Access Driveway and the existing public hydrant adjacent on San Marcos Court, the Fire Department will not be required to drive the Fire Apparatus down the Existing Common Access Driveway and therefor it is not necessary for the Driveway to be improved to Fire Code Standards and City Engineering Standards with this application. 5. “Lots taking access by an easement must record a shared maintenance agreement for the driveway/accessway. The agreement shall be recorded prior to or concurrently with the ﬁnal parcel map.” A recorded Shared Maintenance Agreement exists for the Existing Common Access Driveway and applicant is committed to participating ﬁnancially with on-going maintenance and repair of the Existing Common Access Driveway. Page of 8 10 Hose-Pull Analysis C. Lot Line Conﬁgurations The location of property lines associated with this Urban Lot Split application comply with the objective standards as identiﬁed in Section 16.18.040 (Location of lot lines), and speciﬁcally: 1. No portion of the Urban Lot Split results in a lot width or depth of less than twenty feet for any portion of the subdivision. 2. No lot line bisects or is located within four feet of any existing or proposed structure. D. Parking Required Both of the resulting Parcels contain adequate space to provide for off-street parking, in conformance with the City’s Parking and Driveway Design and Development Standards and will do so in conjunction with the Building Permit Submittal for future residential development. Exceptions “A. All proposed lots and development proposed pursuant to this chapter shall comply with all city zoning codes, objective policies, and guidelines unless an exception is granted. No exception shall be granted for any of the qualifying requirements as outlined in Section 16.15.020. Any proposed exception to any relevant objective standards, policies, guidelines, or codes shall not be granted unless the community development director can affirmatively determine the application meets all of the below requirements. For the purpose of these requirements, existing improvements or development is not considered a physical constraint.” “B. The necessity to grant the exception(s) is based on site development feasibility where there are no options for other design alternatives such as modifying the footprint, moving lot lines, adding stories, or reducing ﬂoor area (to minimum eight hundred square feet) and where the applicant has demonstrated it is physically not possible to redesign the project to avoid the necessity of exceptions.” “C. The requested exceptions represent the minimum deviation necessary to allow the construction of two units on each resulting parcel and which would not require any of the units to be less than eight hundred square feet. (Ord. 1729 § 4 (Exh. A), 2023)” The project is requesting the following exceptions to the Objective Standards: 1. Existing Access Easement Serves more than Two Lots. 2. Existing Access Easement is 19’ Wide, rather than 20’, as required. Page of 9 10 These are existing, minor, deviations that are neither exacerbated nor worsened by the proposed Urban Lot Split. The existing Vehicle Access Easement is located off-site and no feasible options or other design alternatives exist that would bring the easement width and number of lots served into full conformance with City Requirements. It is physically not possible to redesign the project to avoid the necessity of the requested exceptions. The requested exceptions represent the minimum deviation necessary to allow for the development of the rear portion of the property as permissible pursuant to SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. The applicant respectfully requests the Community Development Director grant the above- mentioned exceptions to the Property Improvement Standards and approve the Urban Lot Split. Environmental Review Pursuant to SB-9, an Urban Lot Split is not a “Project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is exempt from Environmental Review. Enclosures 1.Planning Application 2.Minor Subdivision Checklist 3.Tentative Parcel Map 4.Preliminary Title Report 5.Assessor’s Parcel Map Page of 10 10 PLANNING APPLICATION Community Development Department • 919 Palm Street • San Luis Obispo, California 93401 • (805) 781-7170 Project Address and Assessors Parcel Number(s): What do you want to do? What is your final goal? Day Phone: Day Phone: Day Phone: The Applicant The representative The property owner Applicant (Who is proposing the project?): Applicant’s Address: Representative (if any): Representative’s Address: Property Owner (if other than applicant): Owner’s Address: Please send all correspondence to: By signing this application I certify that I have reviewed this completed application and the attached material and consent to its filing. I agree to allow the Community Development Department to duplicate and distribute plans to interested persons as it determines is necessary for the processing of the application. Applicant/Representative Certification: By signing this application I certify that the information provided is accurate. I understand the City might not approve what I’m applying for, or might set conditions of approval. I agree to allow the Community Development Department to duplicate and distribute plans to interested persons as it determines is necessary for processing of the application. Signed Date Signed Date This section is to be completed by the property owner and/or occupant who controls access to the property. To adequately evaluate many project proposals Community Development Department Staff, Commissioners and City Council Members will have to gain access to the exterior of the real property in order to adequately review and report on the proposed project. Your signature below certifies that you agree to give the City permission to access the project site from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, as part of the normal review of this planning application. Occasionally, Community Development Department staff may need access to one or more buildings on the project site. If this is the case, Staff will use the contact information below to arange an appointment. Permission to Access Property:Interior Inspection Contact Information: Signed Date Name: Address: Day Phone: Check Review Application No. Fee Paid Rezoning/PD Use Permit Variance ARC Review Env. Review Subdivision GP Amendment Annexation Other Application fee paid by: the applicant the representative the property owner Received by: Date: Notes to file: Office Use Only6-16 Indemnification Agreement: The Owner/Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents or officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void, or annul, in whole or in part, the City’s approval of this project. In the event that the City fails to promptly notify the Owner / Applicant of any such claim, action or pro- ceeding, or that the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense of said claim, this condition shall thereafter be of no further force or effect. Signed Date Email: Email: Email: Property Owner Authorization: 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 Community Development Department 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California (805) 781-7170 Completed Planning Application Form: Applications can be obtained from the Community Development Department or by mail, fax, or at: www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/community-development Applications for development permits must include, at minimum, the information in this checklist in order to be accepted for processing and evaluation for final action. Additional information may be required following initial review by staff. Applications missing information in this checklist will not be accepted for review. Preliminary title report. An Authorization consenting to the proposed subdivision signed by all parties having a record title interest in the property to be subdivided (if not included on the planning application form.) Assessor Parcel Map(s) with the property to be subdivided highlighted. Lot lines/Structures. Existing or proposed street and lot lines and the location and outline to scale of all structures which are to be retained within the subdivision and all structures outside the subdivision within 10 feet of the boundary lines; the distances between structures to be retained and notations concerning all structures which are to be removed. Trees. The location, type, trunk and canopy diameter of all trees on the property and indicate status (e.g. to be removed, maintained, or relocated); notations as to general type of vegetation in areas not occupied by trees. Topography. Topographic information based on City datum (reference data source). Contours shall have a minimum interval of two meters. Property boundaries. The boundaries of the subdivision, defined by legal description, with sufficient information to locate the property and to determine its position with respect to adjacent named or numbered subdivisions, if any. Subdivider. Names and addresses of the subdivider and all parties having record title interest in the property being subdivided. Map maker. Name and address of the person or entity who prepared the map and the applicable registration or license number. Map number. The parcel map number (available from County Planning Dept. 781-5600), name if any, date of preparation, North arrow, metric scale, and, if based on a survey, the date of the survey. Easements. The locations, widths and purpose of all existing and proposed easements for utilities, drainage and other public purposes, shown by dashed lines, within and adjacent to the subdivision (including building setback lines, if known); all existing and proposed utilities including size of water lines and the size and grade of sewer lines, location of manholes, fire hydrants, fire sprinkler backflow device, fire sprinkler water lateral, street trees and street lights. Application Checklist Effective: 7-01-2023 Minor Subdivision (4 lots or fewer) Tentative Subdivision Map Application Fee: Refer to current Comprehensive Fee Schedule Checklist continued on next page. Tentative Parcel Map, at appropriate scale, using U.S. Customary or English Units •9 copies at full size (18” x 26”) •1 copy at reduced size (8.5” x 11”) Drainage. The name, location, width and directions of flow of all watercourses and flood hazard zone areas within and adjacent to the property involved; the proposed method of providing storm water drainage and erosion control. Exceptions. Any exception being requested in accordance with the requirements of Municipal Code - Chapter 16.48 - Subdivision Exceptions shall be clearly labeled and identified as to nature and purpose. Public access. The boundaries, acreage and use of existing and proposed public areas in and adjacent to the subdivision. If land is to be offered for the dedication for park or recreation purposes or for the purpose of providing public access to any public waterway, river or stream, it shall be so designated. Railroad easments. The location of all railroad rights-of-way and grade crossings. Water systems. The locations of any existing or abandoned wells, septic leaching fields, springs, water impound- ments and similar features to the extent they affect the proposed use of the property. Subdivision boundaries. When it is known that separate final maps are to be filed on portions of the property shown on the tentative map, show the subdivision boundaries which will appear on said final maps and note the sequence in which said final maps will be filed. Condominium information. Maps for condominium projects shall indicate the address of the property and the number, size and location of proposed dwelling units, parking spaces, and private or public open spaces. Condo- minium project maps shall comply with the City’s Condominium Development and Conversion Regulations. For all condominium projects, the floor area of each unit shall be shown in proper scale and location together with the plan view of each ownership unit. Also include an open space plan showing “qualifying” private and common areas with square footages of those areas (private open spaces shall be totaled per unit). The following supplemental material shall be filed with the tentative map: A vicinity map of appropriate scale and showing sufficient adjoining territory to clearly indicate surrounding streets, other land in the subdivider’s ownership, and other features with a bearing on the proposed subdivision. A statement of existing and proposed land use. A statement of proposed improvements and landscape modifications, including the estimated time of completion in relation to subdivision of the property. A description of proposed public or commonly held open space easement agreements, if applicable. Draft covenants, conditions and restrictions if they are integral to the development concept or propose atypical requirements. A written description of requested exceptions from the subdivision design standards for such items as lot area and dimensions, street sections or utility easements. Proposed building setback and yards if different from those in the Zoning Regulations. Lot statistics. The lines and approximate dimensions of all lots, and the number assigned to each lot (lots shall be numbered consecutively); the total number of lots; the area of each lot. Streets. The locations, widths and names or designations of all existing or proposed streets, alleys, paths and other rights-of-way, whether public or private; private easements within and adjacent to the subdivision; the radius of each centerline curve; a cross-section of each street and planned line for street widening or for any other public project in and adjacent to the subdivision; private streets shall be clearly indicated. Checklist continued on next page. Water Efficient Landscape Standards Provide the square footage of each Hydrozone area (landscaped areas having plants with similar water needs, served by valves with the same irrigation schedule). Provide a completed Worksheet for Maximum Applied Water Allowance and Estimated Total Water Use calculations Complete online & print, or download Excel worksheet: www.slocity.org/utilities/download/lndscpcalc.xls Minor Subdivision (Tentative Subdivision Map) Page 2 Site Hazards. The location of all potentially dangerous areas, including areas subject to inundation, landslide, settlement, excessive noise, and the means of mitigating the hazards. Tentative Parcel Map (cont...) Distribution and general nature of rock and soils. A reasonable evaluation and prediction of the performance of any proposed cut or fill in relation to geologic conditions. Capability of soils and substrata to support structures. Recommendations concerning future detailed subsurface sampling and testing that may be required prior to building. Capability of soils and substrata to support structures. Engineering Geology Report. An engineering geology report may be required in areas of “moderate”, “high”, and “very high” landslide risks, and in areas of “high” and “high+” liquefaction and subsidence potential as noted in the General Plan Seismic Safety Element. The engineering geology report shall include definite statements, conclusions and recommendations concerning the following, as applicable: Location of major geologic features. Topography and drainage in the subject areas. Low Impact Development (Stormwater Requirements). Based on increased impervious surface area created by your project, and on the nature of the project (certain site features or intended land uses), your project may be subject to certain Low Impact Development (LID) Measures to reduce stormwater runoff. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan. Show existing and proposed contours, finished floor elevations, retaining walls and retaining wall heights, approximate area, depth and volume of cuts and location of fills, creek flow line, flow direction, top of banks, flood zones and areas of flooding in a 100-year storm. Checklist continued on next page. Supplemental Materials (cont...) A soils engineering report, prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California and based upon adequate test borings, shall be required for every subdivision, unless the City Engineer determines that no analysis is necessary. If the soils engineering report indicates soil problems, a soils investigation of each lot in the subdivision may be required. The soils engineering report shall include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures and design criteria for corrective measures, when nec- essary, and opinions and recommendations covering the adequacy of sites for development. In potential noise problem areas identified in the General Plan Noise Element, specific site analysis by an acoustical engineer or other approved professional with qualifications in acoustic design may be required by the Community Development Director. Such a study shall define the noise exposure problems, conclusions and recommendations for corrective or mitigating measures, when necessary, and opinions and recommendations covering the suitability of the site for development. Retaining wall locations and heights. Waterway Management Plan Compliance: Detailed analysis of the site will be required for some projects, consistent with Section 2.2, Volume III of the WMP, the City’s Drainage Design Manual. Drainage analysis submittals shall include adequate supporting hydrologic and hydraulic information for the proposed improvements. The Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report shall be prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California. Details of report contents are in Section 2.2 of the Manual. Inclusionary Housing Proposal: Provide a statement indicating how the project will meet its inclusionary housing requirement including plans showing the number, type and location of affordable units to be built or converted and the term of affordability, or a preliminary calculation of in-lieu fees, or an offer of land dedication. Page 3 Stormwater (Stormwater Control Plan for Post Construction Requirements): Complete the Stormwater Control Plan for Post Construction Requirements Checklist available from Community Development, and online on the Engineering Development Review web page (www.slocity.org > Government > Department Directory > Community Development) Minor Subdivision (Tentative Subdivision Map) Vesting Map Application Requirements All vesting tentative map submittals must be accurate and complete, and must satisfy all requirements of the Community Development Department. At the time a vesting tentative map is filed a subdivider shall also supply the following information: A statement that Architectural Review approval has been granted, or a complete application for Architectural Review approval and plans have been filed which will be concurrently processed with the vesting tentative map for all buildings to be constructed on lots within the boundary of the vesting tentative map. A statement that the vesting tentative map is consistent with the current zoning, or that an application has been filed for rezoning or prezoning the land which will be processed concurrently with the vesting tentative map. If a planned development permit, hillside planned development permitor use permit is required, said permit shall be processed prior to or concurrently with the vesting tentative map. A tentative utility plan indicating the location of all public utilities and facilities including, but not limited to, facilities for water, sewer, electric, gas, cable TV and street lighting to be installed to serve the subdivision and any facilities which currently exist within the boundary of the subdivision. Identify the dimensions (in scale) and proposed use of all buildings to be constructed within the subdivision. Proposed grading plans based on actual field surveys. Wild fire prevention plan and/or noise analysis with suggested mitigation measures if required by the City’s General Plan or any specific plan. Required approval letters from other agencies where applicable and feasible. Traffic studies including, but not limited to, existing and future traffic, geometrics, number of lanes, level of service, and recommended pavement sections in compliance with the City’s Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. When required by the Community Development Department, feasibility studies or other future impact studies. Any studies or information deemed necessary by the Director to evaluate environmental and economic impacts of the project. Wild fire prevention plan and/or noise analysis with suggested mitigation measures if required by the City’s General Plan or any specific plan. Page 4 Minor Subdivision (Tentative Subdivision Map) SAN MARCOS CTDDPARCEL 1PARCEL 2AUGUSTA STAUGUSTA STJOHNSON AVETENTATIVE PARCELMAP SLO 24-0045 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Countersigned By: Christie Clemons Authorized Officer or Agent Michael J. Nolan, President Attest: Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1234 Monterey Street, Suite 110, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Amendment B Title Officer: Reece Benson Email: rbenson@fnf.com Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB TO:Paul Hatalsky - C/O Development + Land Use Consulting 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Brian Cowen PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES):1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: October 25, 2024 at 07:30 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Parcel Map 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee as to Parcel(s) 1 Easement(s) more fully described below as to Parcel(s) 2 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41' WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 255 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF JOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area:003-000 Tax Identification No.: 004-782-081 Fiscal Year:2024-2025 1st Installment: $4,472.79 Open 2nd Installment: $4,472.79 Open Exemption:$7,000.00 Land:$461,469.00 Improvements: $354,976.00 Personal Property: $0.00 Bill No.:2024/25 004-782-081 Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 2. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 3. All taxes or assessments approved, levied or enacted by the State, County, Municipality, Township or similar taxing authority, which are not yet due and payable, including but not limited to any retroactive increases in taxes or assessments resulting from any retroactive increase in the valuation of the land by the State, County, Municipality, Township, or other taxing authority. Any possible charges or assessments for water bills, public utilities, code enforcement and sanitary bills which may exist, but have not yet been recorded and/or filed. 4. Any liens or other assessments, bonds, or special district liens including without limitation, Community Facility Districts, that arise by reason of any local, City, Municipal or County Project or Special District. 5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: M. N. Goldtree, et ux Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 25, 1941 Recording No.: Book 303, Page 172, of Official Records Affects:The Southwesterly 5 feet of said land Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 6. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable laws, as set forth in the document referred to in the numbered item last above shown. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or trust deed made in good faith and for value. 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Lines of poles and incidental purposes Recording No.: Book 306, Page 150, of Official Records Affects:Southwesterly line 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Purpose:Public utilities Affects:Southwesterly 5 feet of Parcel 1 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: March 2, 1987 Recording No.: 13935, Book 2958, Page 678, of Official Records Affects:Northwesterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation and Pacific Bell Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 27, 1989 Recording No.: 50559, Book 3356, Page 600, of Official Records Affects:Southeasterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars 11. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled:Option Agreement Dated:December 29, 1998 Executed by: Frank & Marilee Taylor, "Optionor" and Jerry M. Reiss and Collette Reiss, "Optionee" Recording Date: December 31, 1998 Recording No.: 1998-087987, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Quitclaim of Option Rights recorded on February 14, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008007408, of Official Records. 12. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, husband and wife as community property Purpose:Ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities Recording Date: December 1, 2003 Recording No.: 2003136913, of Official Records Affects:Said land and Re-Recording Date:December 24, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003144641, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 4 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 and Re-Recording Date:December 31, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003146088, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Assignment of Grant of Easement recorded of November 12, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021075598, of Official Records. 13. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount:$591,000.00 Dated:January 29, 2002 Trustor/Grantor: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man Trustee:Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), solely as nominee for Guaranteed Rate, Inc., a Delaware corporation Loan No.: 203438356 Recording Date: February 3, 2021 Recording No.: 2021008336, of Official Records END OF EXCEPTIONS Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 5 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 NOTES Note 1.Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 2.Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Note 3.Note: The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said Land a Single Family Residence, known as 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California, to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 4.Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note 5.If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6.The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 7.Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB Amendment: B NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.30.24 6 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 Note 8.The following Exclusion(s) are added to preliminary reports, commitments and will be included as an endorsement in the following policies A.2006 ALTA Owner's Policy (06-17-06). 6.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. B.2006 ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06). 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 9.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. C.ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13) and CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13). 10.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. D.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 12.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 13.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. E.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 7.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the public records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a tribe or on behalf of its members. 8.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage based on the application of a tribe's law resulting from the failure of the insured mortgage to specify state law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the insured mortgage. END OF NOTES Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017 Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 FSLC-512400177 - WIRE0016 (DSI Rev. 12/07/17) TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation:Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov Privacy Statement Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective July 1, 2024 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g. Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); financial account information (e.g. loan or bank account information); biometric data (e.g. fingerprints, retina or iris scans, voiceprints, or other unique biological characteristics, and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; browser version, language, and type; domain name system requests; and browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Privacy Statement Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. To improve our products and services. To prevent and detect fraud; To maintain the security of our systems, tools, accounts, and applications; To verify and authenticate identities and credentials; To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (https://fnf.com/pages/californiaprivacy.aspx) or call (888) 413-1748. For Connecticut Residents: For additional information about your Connecticut consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. For Colorado Residents: For additional information about your Colorado consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Privacy Statement Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginquiries@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For additional information about your Oregon consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710 We may disclose the categories of Personal Information and Browsing information listed above to the following categories of third parties: FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; Service providers; Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. For Texas Residents: For additional information about your Texas consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. We may disclose the categories of Personal Information and Browsing information listed above to the following categories of third parties: FNF affiliates and subsidiaries; Non-affiliated third parties, with your consent; Business in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets; Service providers; Law endorsement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order. For Utah Residents: For additional information about your Utah consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, please call (888) 714-2710. For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. For Virginia Residents: For additional information about your Virginia consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. Privacy Statement Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Inquiry Website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy@fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 (11-09-18) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY (02-04-22) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7 Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: PART I 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (7-01-21) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27. 2. Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You; b. not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to You; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b. in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land. Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21. 5. The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 7. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 8. Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any other subsurface substance. 9. Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a or 27. 10. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws. 8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (07-01-2021) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.] 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. Notice of Available Discounts Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 10.30.24 @ 03:23 PM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC - Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company FNTC - Fidelity National Title Company of California FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Company FNTCCA - Fidelity National Title Company of California CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company TICOR - Ticor Title Company of California LTC - Lawyer's Title Company SLTC - ServiceLink Title Company Available Discounts DISASTER LOANS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) The charge for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended coverage) covering the financing or refinancing by an owner of record, within twenty-four (24) months of the date of a declaration of a disaster area by the government of the United States or the State of California on any land located in said area, which was partially or totally destroyed in the disaster, will be fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate. CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC, FNTIC) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be forty percent (40%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. MILITARY DISCOUNT RATE Upon the Company being advised in writing and prior to the closing of the transaction that an active duty, honorably separated, or retired member of the United States Military or Military Reserves or National Guard is acquiring or selling an owner occupied one-to-four family property, the selling owner or acquiring buyer, as applicable, will be entitled to a discount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the otherwise applicable rates such party would be charged for title insurance policies. Minimum charge: Four Hundred Twenty-Five And No/100 Dollars ($425.00) The Company may require appropriate proof of eligibility from the parties to the transaction verifying they are entitled to the discount as described. No other discounts or special rates, or combination of discounts or special rates, shall be applicable. 131 From:Hutchinson, Julianna Sent:Monday, January 13, 2025 11:12 AM To:Brian Cowen Cc:Daniel, Josh Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, That comment below is acceptable, if you have any alternative questions, I have cc’d the Fire Marshal. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 2:59 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Juliana, Thanks for meeting with us today to talk about the dry standpipe system and for being open to discussing exact timing for submittal of the service report. We will plan to resubmit the Tentative Parcel Map with the following response to Item 9: “Applicant requests to defer certification of the existing dry standpipe system until prior to Building Permit Issuance." Can you let me know if I got the wording right and if there is any possibility you could do the re-check on our project, assuming we resubmit in the next few weeks? Thanks, 132 Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 3, 2025, at 8:36 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Juliana, 1:30 works great. See you then! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 3, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I had something get scheduled for 1pm on the 7th, but I can do 1:30pm if that works. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II 133 <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2025 8:11 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Juliana, The 7th at 1pm would be perfect. Thank you! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 23, 2024, at 5:05 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Would you like to meet on the 7th? I can do anytime between 8am-5pm and can meet you at Station 1 in SLO. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 134 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 8:59 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julianna, Thank you for the explanation and for making time for us today. It sounds like the property owner isn’t readily available this morning... Can we schedule to meet up at the station, when you have returned from the Holidays? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:49 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I am available for a call tomorrow between 9am and noon if you have any questions. The dry standpipe was likely installed to provide water supply for the existing back building and those owners may have a record of install or testing, otherwise it will require a recertification test to verify it is not broken and will still function as intended. This 135 is done through companies like the ones you mentioned previously. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401- 5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image 005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 136 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and 137 passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401- 5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004. png><image005.png><image 006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications 138 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, January 13, 2025 10:55 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Cc: Subject:Re: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 Attachments:25.01.13 SBDV-0738-2024 Responses to Completeness Letter #1.zip This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ethan, Please find the attached resubmittal for the 1364 San Marcos Court lot split. Hope you have a great week! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 139 140 On Dec 9, 2024, at 10:01 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, I hope this email finds you well. Attached is Incomplete Letter #1 for your application, SBDV-0738- 2024. Included in this letter is a list of corrections/comments pertaining to your application that require your attention. Updated application materials can be submitted to me via email. As a reminder - upon resubmittal, please include a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on the map and/or other application materials. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications <SBDV-0738-2024_Incomplete Letter 1.pdf> 141 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 7:28 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Thanks for the great news. We will finish the updates to the TPM and get it back in. Take care, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 8, 2025, at 4:29 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this matter. I was finally able to have a conversation with a supervisor who deals with most SB 9 lot splits, and they confirmed with me that we can accept this deferral of the vehicle turnaround to the building permit submittal. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 142 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 5:01 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Hope you enjoyed the Holidays! I wanted to circle back and find out if there had been an opportunity to seek input from the others on this? Much Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 5:15 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: I appreciate your patience on the matter Brian. Happy holidays to you as well! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:48 PM 143 To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, No apology needed, I hope you enjoy the Holidays! I don’t mind waiting to re-submit until you have had an opportunity to check in with the others. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay. I was hoping to receive some more input from my supervisors on this item before I left for the holidays, but that has not happened. I think for now this will work, and I can revisit this issue with them after the holidays with your response in hand. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 144 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. <image007.png> Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 145 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image 005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, 146 A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401- 3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image00 5.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 147 <image001.png> 148 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 4:29 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this matter. I was finally able to have a conversation with a supervisor who deals with most SB 9 lot splits, and they confirmed with me that we can accept this deferral of the vehicle turnaround to the building permit submittal. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2025 5:01 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Hope you enjoyed the Holidays! I wanted to circle back and find out if there had been an opportunity to seek input from the others on this? Much Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 149 On Dec 19, 2024, at 5:15 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: I appreciate your patience on the matter Brian. Happy holidays to you as well! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:48 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, No apology needed, I hope you enjoy the Holidays! I don’t mind waiting to re-submit until you have had an opportunity to check in with the others. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: 150 Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay. I was hoping to receive some more input from my supervisors on this item before I left for the holidays, but that has not happened. I think for now this will work, and I can revisit this issue with them after the holidays with your response in hand. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. <image007.png> Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 151 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 152 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image 006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian 153 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 154 From:Beech, Ryan Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 2:02 PM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for the heads up. From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:31 PM To: Beech, Ryan <RBeech@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ryan – wanted to give you a heads up regarding this pending lateral replacement, and the applicant’s interest in a rebate. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:28 PM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Subject: RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, Yes – the rebate application would be reviewed similar to all applications, but the subdivision application would not preclude eligibility. I will give Ryan a heads up as well, that you are interested in the rebate. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Are we safe to conclude the project is still eligible for the rebate, even though the TPM has already been submitted and is under review? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 155 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 156 Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting 157 Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). 158 Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 159 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:31 PM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi Ryan – wanted to give you a heads up regarding this pending lateral replacement, and the applicant’s interest in a rebate. From: Scott, Shawna Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:28 PM To: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Subject: RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, Yes – the rebate application would be reviewed similar to all applications, but the subdivision application would not preclude eligibility. I will give Ryan a heads up as well, that you are interested in the rebate. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Are we safe to conclude the project is still eligible for the rebate, even though the TPM has already been submitted and is under review? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 160 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 161 Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management 162 CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not 163 require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 164 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:28 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, Yes – the rebate application would be reviewed similar to all applications, but the subdivision application would not preclude eligibility. I will give Ryan a heads up as well, that you are interested in the rebate. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Are we safe to conclude the project is still eligible for the rebate, even though the TPM has already been submitted and is under review? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 165 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 166 Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian 167 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? 168 Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 169 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:26 PM To:Lehman, Chris Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Great, thanks! I’ll give Ryan a heads up. From: Lehman, Chris <clehman@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:47 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Yes. We will just have to track the application and manage notes in Cityworks which Ryan is good at doing. From: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:26 PM To: Lehman, Chris <clehman@slocity.org> Subject: FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Chris, Please let me know if I’m missing or misinterpreting the requirements. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 170 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 171 Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management 172 CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). 173 Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 174 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:26 PM To:Lehman, Chris Subject:FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Chris, Please let me know if I’m missing or misinterpreting the requirements. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 175 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 176 Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian 177 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? 178 Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 179 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 11:52 AM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Thanks for this information Shawna, very helpful! Are we safe to conclude the project is still eligible for the rebate, even though the TPM has already been submitted and is under review? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 180 On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:06 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Here is some additional information regarding the rebate program: https://forms.slocity.org/forms/lateral_rebate Eligibility requirements include that the work must be completed on or after September 3, 2024. Please note the required application materials, including but not limited to copies of receipts. If you haven’t gone through a lateral construction before, please note that building and encroachment permits are required through the Community Development and Public Works Departments (joint front counter at 919 Palm Street). Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, 181 Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, 182 Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 183 <image001.png> <image002.png> 184 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:24 AM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Shawna, How far along in the process could the property owner replace the sewer lateral and still be eligible for the 4k rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. 185 If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. 186 Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 187 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 7, 2025 2:59 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Juliana, Thanks for meeting with us today to talk about the dry standpipe system and for being open to discussing exact timing for submittal of the service report. We will plan to resubmit the Tentative Parcel Map with the following response to Item 9: “Applicant requests to defer certification of the existing dry standpipe system until prior to Building Permit Issuance." Can you let me know if I got the wording right and if there is any possibility you could do the re-check on our project, assuming we resubmit in the next few weeks? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 3, 2025, at 8:36 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Juliana, 188 1:30 works great. See you then! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Jan 3, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I had something get scheduled for 1pm on the 7th, but I can do 1:30pm if that works. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2025 8:11 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Juliana, The 7th at 1pm would be perfect. Thank you! Brian 189 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 23, 2024, at 5:05 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Would you like to meet on the 7th? I can do anytime between 8am-5pm and can meet you at Station 1 in SLO. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 8:59 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julianna, Thank you for the explanation and for making time for us today. It sounds like the property owner isn’t readily available this morning... Can we schedule to meet up at the station, when you have returned from the Holidays? 190 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:49 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I am available for a call tomorrow between 9am and noon if you have any questions. The dry standpipe was likely installed to provide water supply for the existing back building and those owners may have a record of install or testing, otherwise it will require a recertification test to verify it is not broken and will still function as intended. This is done through companies like the ones you mentioned previously. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401- 5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image 005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications 191 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? 192 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401- 5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 193 slocity.org <image003.png><image004. png><image005.png><image 006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications 194 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, January 2, 2025 5:01 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Hope you enjoyed the Holidays! I wanted to circle back and find out if there had been an opportunity to seek input from the others on this? Much Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 5:15 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: I appreciate your patience on the matter Brian. Happy holidays to you as well! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:48 PM 195 To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, No apology needed, I hope you enjoy the Holidays! I don’t mind waiting to re-submit until you have had an opportunity to check in with the others. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay. I was hoping to receive some more input from my supervisors on this item before I left for the holidays, but that has not happened. I think for now this will work, and I can revisit this issue with them after the holidays with your response in hand. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) 196 Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. <image007.png> Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><ima ge006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 197 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 198 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image 006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e- notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 199 From:Hutchinson, Julianna Sent:Monday, December 23, 2024 5:06 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, Would you like to meet on the 7th? I can do anytime between 8am-5pm and can meet you at Station 1 in SLO. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 8:59 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julianna, Thank you for the explanation and for making time for us today. It sounds like the property owner isn’t readily available this morning... Can we schedule to meet up at the station, when you have returned from the Holidays? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer 200 San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:49 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I am available for a call tomorrow between 9am and noon if you have any questions. The dry standpipe was likely installed to provide water supply for the existing back building and those owners may have a record of install or testing, otherwise it will require a recertification test to verify it is not broken and will still function as intended. This is done through companies like the ones you mentioned previously. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 201 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 202 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><ima ge007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 205 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, December 20, 2024 8:59 AM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Julianna, Thank you for the explanation and for making time for us today. It sounds like the property owner isn’t readily available this morning... Can we schedule to meet up at the station, when you have returned from the Holidays? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:49 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I am available for a call tomorrow between 9am and noon if you have any questions. The dry standpipe was likely installed to provide water supply for the existing back building and those owners may have a record of install or testing, otherwise it will require a recertification test to verify it is not broken and will still function as intended. This is done through companies like the ones you mentioned previously. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org 206 T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian 207 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><ima ge007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. 208 Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 209 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Thursday, December 19, 2024 5:16 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) I appreciate your patience on the matter Brian. Happy holidays to you as well! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:48 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, No apology needed, I hope you enjoy the Holidays! I don’t mind waiting to re-submit until you have had an opportunity to check in with the others. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 210 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay. I was hoping to receive some more input from my supervisors on this item before I left for the holidays, but that has not happened. I think for now this will work, and I can revisit this issue with them after the holidays with your response in hand. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. <image007.png> Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 211 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 212 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><ima ge007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 213 <image001.png> 215 From:Hutchinson, Julianna Sent:Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:50 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, I am available for a call tomorrow between 9am and noon if you have any questions. The dry standpipe was likely installed to provide water supply for the existing back building and those owners may have a record of install or testing, otherwise it will require a recertification test to verify it is not broken and will still function as intended. This is done through companies like the ones you mentioned previously. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer 216 San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org 217 T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 218 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, December 19, 2024 4:48 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, No apology needed, I hope you enjoy the Holidays! I don’t mind waiting to re-submit until you have had an opportunity to check in with the others. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 19, 2024, at 4:30 PM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good afternoon, Apologies for the delay. I was hoping to receive some more input from my supervisors on this item before I left for the holidays, but that has not happened. I think for now this will work, and I can revisit this issue with them after the holidays with your response in hand. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 219 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. <image007.png> Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 220 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><ima 221 ge007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 222 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:46 AM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) FYI From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:35 AM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Fantastic, thanks Shawna! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. 223 Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. 224 Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 225 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 17, 2024 10:35 AM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Fantastic, thanks Shawna! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 17, 2024, at 9:08 AM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Per our Municipal Code, replacement of the lateral is required. And yes, you can replace the lateral at the same time as construction of water service for the new parcel, as long as the lateral is replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 4:06 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, I just wanted to circle back regarding 1364 San Marcos Court. If possible, we would like to time replacement of the existing sewer lateral so it can occur at the same time as construction of the water service for the new parcel and the other construction. Have a great evening! Thanks, Brian 226 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? 227 Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 228 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 4:00 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Julliana, I checked the standpipe and didn’t see a service sticker... Can we schedule an appointment to meet with you and discuss further? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 11, 2024, at 4:23 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian 229 Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? 230 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 231 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 3:58 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, Just checking in on 1364 San Marcos Court. Are we ok to respond to Completeness Item #1 with something like the following? “On-site vehicle turn-around will serve Parcel 1 vehicles only (no emergency vehicles or vehicles from neighboring properties). Design will occur in conjunction the future house/ driveway and will be provided for City review with the Building Permit submittal”. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:26 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image001.png> Community Development 232 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 233 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re- submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 234 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 11, 2024 4:24 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Julianna, Thanks for checking the records for us. I will check for a sticker on the pipe and otherwise plan to talk to the property owner about taking care of this. Do we have the option of paying a fee for the Fire Department to do the testing/ verification or do we need to engage someone like CJ Schaeffer or Alpha Fire? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 235 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 236 From:Hutchinson, Julianna Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 11:12 AM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, I do not have a copy of any service reports for that system. If it was tested and passed there may be a service sticker on the pipe with the date it was tested. I would like to verify the dry standpipe is in working order as it would be an additional cost to repair if broken. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, 237 Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 238 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:29 AM To:Scott, Shawna Subject:Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Shawna, No worries, the print is small and it’s like looking for a needle in a haystack! Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Dec 9, 2024, at 5:19 PM, Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. 239 I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <image002.png> 240 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:27 AM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Sounds great – and no worries at all! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 9:25 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Re: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ethan, I will plan to come see you around 1pm tomorrow (Wednesday). Just noticed I had addressed you as “Eric” in my initial email message. Please accept my apology, I will try not to do that in the future. Much appreciated, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 241 On Dec 10, 2024, at 9:03 AM, Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> wrote: Good morning, A good time to visit me at the office would be tomorrow between 1:00 and 4:00 PM. If tomorrow does not work for you, then Thursday between 9:00 AM and 12:00 PM would also be a good time to stop by. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 242 243 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:58 AM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map. Would you be open to a discussion about timing for recertification of the existing dry standpipe system? We would propose to address that item prior to recordation of the final map. Do you happen to have the most recent service report on file? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 244 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 10, 2024 8:52 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Eric, Thanks for reviewing and commenting on the Tentative Parcel Map for us. When would be a good time for me to stop by the office, this week, to go over items 1-4 and make sure I understand how to fully address those items with the re-submittal? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 245 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Monday, December 9, 2024 5:24 PM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:FW: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Ryan, I will give you call regarding this one – The code states that inspection is required when: (C)(1)(e). Whenever property located in the city and containing one or more structures which are served by a private sewer lateral or laterals is subdivided. The inspection shall occur prior to recordation of the final map. Then states: h. For events identified in subsections (C)(1)(a) through (C)(1)(f) of this section, repair or replacement shall be made pursuant to subsection G of this section. Subsection G states: G. Sewer Lateral Repair or Replacement Requirements. Upon receipt of the private sewer lateral inspection report pursuant to this chapter, the city shall review the private sewer lateral inspection and lateral inspection report to verify the plumber/contractor findings and provide the owner with a determination on whether the lateral meets the criteria described in subsection B of this section. If the private sewer lateral is not in compliance with subsection B of this section, then it shall be repaired or replaced to conform to such standards within one hundred eighty days. If an inspection of a noncompliant lateral was conditioned due to a sanitary sewer overflow or from findings of infiltration and intrusion, or a lateral with defects having not met the required pipe material requirements, it must be completely replaced rather than repaired. No person shall repair or replace a sewer lateral without first obtaining a permit from the city. From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? 246 Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 247 248 249 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Monday, December 9, 2024 5:19 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Hi Brian, The easements as shown on the tentative map, to be recorded with the final map, address my comment – my apologies for missing that notation. Regarding replacement of the lateral, I will touch base with Ryan regarding what is required per our Municipal Code. Thank you, Shawna From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, December 9, 2024 2:28 PM To: Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Shawna, Hope you are having a great day. I just wanted to check in on the Utilities Department map check comments, to make sure I fully understand how to address each comment with our re-submittal. Regarding Comment #7, Refer to the TPM for proposed Private Water and Sewer Line Easements on proposed Parcel 2, benefitting proposed Parcel 1. Will this response be adequate to address the comment or are we looking for something more? Regarding Comment #8, On October 24th, I had a phone conversation with Ryan Beech, during which Ryan stated that the City would not require replacement of the lateral with the SB-9 lot split (it could be done later with the other construction). Please advise how we should best address this comment? Feel free to call if preferred. Much thanks and appreciation, 250 Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 251 252 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Monday, December 9, 2024 10:02 AM To:briancowen@mac.com; Subject:SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Ct.) | Incomplete Letter #1 Attachments:SBDV-0738-2024_Incomplete Letter 1.pdf Good morning, I hope this email finds you well. Attached is Incomplete Letter #1 for your application, SBDV-0738-2024. Included in this letter is a list of corrections/comments pertaining to your application that require your attention. Updated application materials can be submitted to me via email. As a reminder - upon resubmittal, please include a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on the map and/or other application materials. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 12/9/2024 Sent via Email Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Brian Cowen 1250 Coral Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Subject: Incomplete Letter #1: SBDV-0738-2024 (1346 San Marcos Court) Dear Paul Hatalsky: The Community Development Department (CDD) received your application for an urban lot split on the property located at 1346 San Marcos Court on November 13, 2024. CDD has reviewed your application and found it to be incomplete. CDD is unable to process your application until additional information and/or revisions have been submitted to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Preliminary review is necessary to ensure that staff has adequate information to evaluate your project and identify any conflicts with City standards or guidelines. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a list of items that need to be addressed prior to taking action on your project. Preliminary review indicates that your application will remain in an incomplete status until the following information and/or revisions are submitted: Note: Upon resubmittal, please provide a narrative indicating where responses to these items can be found on plans. Department comments/completeness items: Planning Division - Community Development Department 1. Project narrative notes that an on-site vehicle turnaround will be provided under a future submittal. This tentative map must include the proposed turnaround required under Section 16.15.025(B)(1)(ii). 2. Show the location of one off-street parking space per existing dwelling unit. 3. Tentative map indicates that a shed near the bottom left corner of the proposed Parcel 2 will be moved. Note where this shed will be moved to and provide distances to nearby parcel lines. 4. Note the name (500-year Flood Zone) and location of the nearby flood hazard zone area on the tentative map. SBDV-0738-2024 – Completeness Review #1 12/9/2024 Page 2 5. The symbol legend on the map notes a preliminary title report dated “9-19-2024” in reference to exceptions listed in said title report. The report provided in your application is dated “October 25,2024.” Ensure that the exceptions noted on the map are consistent with the exceptions listed in the title report provided in your application. 6. Note the width of San Marcos Court on the tentative map. If you have any questions on the above planning comments, or any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 805-781-7576, or by e-mail at: ejestrad@slocity.org Engineering Division – Public Works/Community Development Department The Engineering Division does not have comments/completeness items for this application. Upon submittal of new application material(s), comments/completeness items may be provided. If you have questions on the above, please contact Engineering Consultant, Steve La Chaine, 805-781-7201, or by e-mail: slachaine@slocity.org Building and Safety Division - Community Development Department The Building and Safety Division does not have comments/completeness items for this application. Upon submittal of new application material(s), comments/completeness items may be provided. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Plans Examiner, Sean McCaffrey, 805-781-7168, or by e-mail: smccaffrey@slocity.org Utilities Department 7. Show the proposed water and sewer easement on Parcel 2 (front parcel). While the property is currently under sole ownership, there is a potential for one or both lots to be sold without the established required easement. 8. The City’s records show that the existing lateral was inspected in September 2024. The report notes the condition as “poor” due to a break in the lateral. Pursuant to City Municipal Code Section 13.08.395: “h. For events identified in the subsections (C)(1)(a) through (C)(1)(f) of this section [which include subdivision of property], repair or replacement shall be made pursuant to subsection G of this section.” Replacement of the existing sewer lateral will be required prior to recordation of the final map. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Special Projects Manager, Shawna Scott, 805-781-7176, or by e-mail: sscott@slocity.org Fire Department 9. Provide service report for the dry standpipe recertifying the system. 10. New houses on separate lots shall have fire sprinklers tied into a 1” water meter. If you have questions on the above items, please contact Fire Inspector, Julianna M. Hutchinson, 805-783-7805, or by e-mail: jhutchin@slocity.org SBDV-0738-2024 – Completeness Review #1 12/9/2024 Page 3 The above list includes all the items initially identified as necessary for us to certify your application as complete. The City may ask for additional information upon more detailed review of your project. If you have any questions regarding this letter or the specific items necessary to submit for a complete application, please contact me at (805) 781-7576 or ejestrad@slocity.org. Sincerely, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner 253 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:36 AM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Check #1 Perfect – thanks for letting me know! Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:34 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Check #1 Hi Ethan, I put my comments into EnerGov the same way I do regular plan review, I copied them below: - Provide service report for the dry standpipe recertifying the system. - New houses on separate lots shall have fire sprinklers tied into a 1” water meter I was unable to edit the attached page due to some permissions. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org 254 Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 9:19 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Check #1 Good morning, I saw that you completed your review for SBDV-0738-2024 and marked it as needing resubmittal. However, your section on the comments sheet is empty. I’m assuming something may have happened to the document since you last reviewed this project. If your comments were lost – let me know how much time you might need to write those up again. We’re technically good till next Friday. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 255 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2024 1:26 PM To:McCaffrey, Seano Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Perfect – thank you! From: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 8:03 AM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 I marked complete and ready for action From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 8:24 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org> Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Good morning, Hope you had a nice holiday weekend! I am looking at the Completeness Review #1 document for SBDV-0738-2024 and see that you had some comments for this application. However, your section is not marked as Complete or Incomplete – I remember that it may have been a week or two ago (although I could be thinking of another application). I just wanted to check in to see if you were still working on your review for this application, or if you’re good to go on this one? The thirty-day review period is up next week, so I’m looking to have everyone’s comments squared away by the end of this week. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 256 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2024 11:45 AM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:Sewer Lateral question - 1364 San Marcos Hi Ryan, I am reviewing a lot split (2-lot subdivision) at 1364 San Marcos. Cityworks notes that the existing sewer lateral serving the existing house was inspected in 9/2024, with a condition of “poor” and noting a break in the lateral. I also see this work order, indicating that the sewer lateral was replaced (if I’m reading this correctly). I wanted to confirm that the sewer lateral was indeed replaced; otherwise, I will point to our Municipal Code and require it: h. For events identified in subsections (C)(1)(a) through (C)(1)(f) of this section, repair or replacement shall be made pursuant to subsection G of this section. 257 From:McCaffrey, Seano Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2024 8:03 AM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 I marked complete and ready for action From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 8:24 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org> Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Good morning, Hope you had a nice holiday weekend! I am looking at the Completeness Review #1 document for SBDV-0738-2024 and see that you had some comments for this application. However, your section is not marked as Complete or Incomplete – I remember that it may have been a week or two ago (although I could be thinking of another application). I just wanted to check in to see if you were still working on your review for this application, or if you’re good to go on this one? The thirty-day review period is up next week, so I’m looking to have everyone’s comments squared away by the end of this week. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 270 From:Scott, Shawna Sent:Monday, December 2, 2024 8:26 AM To:Estrada, Ethan; Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:RE: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Will do, thank you, Ethan. From: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 8:18 AM To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Good morning, Hope you all had a nice holiday weekend! For SBDV-0738-2024, the thirty-day review period will be up next Friday. With that in mind, I am looking to have everyone’s comments (if any) by the end of this week. Please let me know if there’s anything I can help you with on this item. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 271 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Monday, December 2, 2024 8:18 AM To:Hutchinson, Julianna; Scott, Shawna Subject:SBDV-0738-2024 | Completeness Review #1 Good morning, Hope you all had a nice holiday weekend! For SBDV-0738-2024, the thirty-day review period will be up next Friday. With that in mind, I am looking to have everyone’s comments (if any) by the end of this week. Please let me know if there’s anything I can help you with on this item. Kind regards, Ethan Estrada Assistant Planner Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E EJEstrad@slocity.org T 805.781.7576 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 272 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2024 7:52 AM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:RE: New application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Thanks! From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 6:22 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: New application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Just letting you know I copied over files and emails related to your recently-assigned application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos), copied to your network directory at: G:\CD-PLAN\EESTRADA\SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 273 From:Estrada, Ethan Sent:Tuesday, November 19, 2024 3:55 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:RE: New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Received – will begin working on it ASAP. From: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 2:48 PM To: Estrada, Ethan <EJEstrad@slocity.org> Subject: FW: New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) New assignment – in pending on the planning project schedule under Housing for now. From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 4:50 PM To: Corey, Tyler <tcorey@slocity.org> Subject: New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Hello Tyler, Attached is a Plan Detailed Report for new application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos), regarding subdivision of property. Application fee paid, ready for assignment. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 274 From:Corey, Tyler Sent:Tuesday, November 19, 2024 2:48 PM To:Estrada, Ethan Subject:FW: New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Attachments:Plan Detailed Report.pdf New assignment – in pending on the planning project schedule under Housing for now. From: Oetzell, Walter Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 4:50 PM To: Corey, Tyler Subject: New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Hello Tyler, Attached is a Plan Detailed Report for new application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos), regarding subdivision of property. Application fee paid, ready for assignment. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications PLAN DETAILED REPORT SBDV-0738-2024 FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Subdivision 11/13/2024App Date:Project:Plan Type: JohnsonSB 9 Urban Lot Split NOT AVAILABLEExp Date:District:Work Class: 0.00Under Review NOT COMPLETEDCompleted:Square Feet:Status: Description: Valuation: SB-9 Urban Lot Split, TPM SLO 24-0045 (see attached project narrative) $0.00 Assigned To:Tyler Corey Approval Expire Date: Parcel:Main004-782-081 Address:1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Main Zone:FLD-X(Flood Zone (FLD-X)) Grid-M-12(City Grid (Grid-M-12)) SZ-R1(Specific Zoning (SZ-R1)) Representative Cowen Consulting Brian Cowen 1250 Coral St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Business: 8057052652 Owner Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: Applicant Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: Created ByNote Date and Time Created 1.Walter OetzellCOMPLETENESS REVIEW v1 (comments due 11/27) [Digital Plan Routing] Building Engineering Fire Utilities 11/13/2024 Invoice No.Amount PaidFeeFee Amount 00037584 $8,704.00 SB 9 Urban Lot Split $8,704.00 $8,704.00 $8,704.00 Total for Invoice 00037584 Grand Total for Plan $8,704.00 $8,704.00 Page 1 of 1City of San Luis ObispoNovember 15, 2024 275 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Friday, November 15, 2024 4:50 PM To:Corey, Tyler Subject:New Application: SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Attachments:Plan Detailed Report.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Categories:New Applications Hello Tyler, Attached is a Plan Detailed Report for new application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos), regarding subdivision of property. Application fee paid, ready for assignment. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications PLAN DETAILED REPORT SBDV-0738-2024 FOR CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Subdivision 11/13/2024App Date:Project:Plan Type: JohnsonSB 9 Urban Lot Split NOT AVAILABLEExp Date:District:Work Class: 0.00Under Review NOT COMPLETEDCompleted:Square Feet:Status: Description: Valuation: SB-9 Urban Lot Split, TPM SLO 24-0045 (see attached project narrative) $0.00 Assigned To:Tyler Corey Approval Expire Date: Parcel:Main004-782-081 Address:1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Main Zone:FLD-X(Flood Zone (FLD-X)) Grid-M-12(City Grid (Grid-M-12)) SZ-R1(Specific Zoning (SZ-R1)) Representative Cowen Consulting Brian Cowen 1250 Coral St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Business: 8057052652 Owner Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: Applicant Paul Hatalsky 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Business: Created ByNote Date and Time Created 1.Walter OetzellCOMPLETENESS REVIEW v1 (comments due 11/27) [Digital Plan Routing] Building Engineering Fire Utilities 11/13/2024 Invoice No.Amount PaidFeeFee Amount 00037584 $8,704.00 SB 9 Urban Lot Split $8,704.00 $8,704.00 $8,704.00 Total for Invoice 00037584 Grand Total for Plan $8,704.00 $8,704.00 Page 1 of 1City of San Luis ObispoNovember 15, 2024 276 From:La Chaine, Steve Sent:Wednesday, November 13, 2024 12:06 PM To:Oetzell, Walter Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:RE: DRT Digital Plan Routing (CC1): Application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) This looks down my alley, so I put my name. :>) From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 11:44 AM To: McCaffrey, Seano <smccaffrey@slocity.org>; Engineering <Engineering@slocity.org>; Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org>; Scott, Shawna <sscott@slocity.org> Subject: DRT Digital Plan Routing (CC1): Application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Hello All, Please consider this a “digital routing” of application materials for Completeness Review (v1) of the Subdivision application SBDV-0738-2024, regarding an Urban Lot Split of the property at 1364 San Marcos Court. Comments are due by November 22nd. A Routing Sheet is attached to this message, and a comments document is attached to the EnerGov application record. https://energov.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/ce52e640-3943-417b-a0fb-0d53691e6520/summary Thanks for your help reviewing. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 277 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Wednesday, November 13, 2024 11:44 AM To:McCaffrey, Seano; Engineering; Hutchinson, Julianna; Scott, Shawna Subject:DRT Digital Plan Routing (CC1): Application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Attachments:Routing Sheet (CC1).pdf Hello All, Please consider this a “digital routing” of application materials for Completeness Review (v1) of the Subdivision application SBDV-0738-2024, regarding an Urban Lot Split of the property at 1364 San Marcos Court. Comments are due by November 22nd. A Routing Sheet is attached to this message, and a comments document is attached to the EnerGov application record. https://energov.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/ce52e640-3943-417b-a0fb-0d53691e6520/summary Thanks for your help reviewing. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1364 San Marcos Ct Subdivision SB 9 Urban Lot Split 004-782-081Description: SB-9 Urban Lot Split, TPM SLO 24-0045 (see attached project narrative) Project: Status: Under Review App Date: 11/8/2024 Exp Date: Complete Date: Assigned To:Tyler Corey Note Created By Date Created COMPLETENESS REVIEW v1 (comments due 11/27) [Digital Plan Routing] Building Engineering Fire Utilities Walter Oetzell 11/13/2024 11:33:12 AM Valuation:$0.00 Square Feet 0.00 Type Name Address City, State Business Applicant 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Representative Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 8057052652 Printed: 11/13/2024 11:36:31 AM Page 1 of 1 Routing Sheet SBDV-0738-2024 278 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Wednesday, November 13, 2024 11:40 AM To:McCaffrey, Seano; Engineering; Hutchinson, Julianna; Scott, Shawna Subject:DRT Digital Plan Routing (CC1): Application SBDV-0738-2024 (1364 San Marcos) Attachments:Routing Sheet (CC1).pdf Hello All, Please consider this a “digital routing” of application materials for Completeness Review (v1) of the Subdivision application SBDV-0738-2024, regarding an Urban Lot Split of the property at 1364 San Marcos Court. Comments are due by November 22nd. A Routing Sheet is attached to this message, and a comments document is attached to the EnerGov application record. https://energov.slocity.org/energov_prod/manageplan/#/plan/d6044930-01af-4932-a1df-91cdaedcfb72/summary Thanks for your help reviewing. Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner Community Development Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E woetzell@slocity.org T 805.781.7593 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 1364 San Marcos Ct Subdivision SB 9 Urban Lot Split 004-782-081Description: SB-9 Urban Lot Split, TPM SLO 24-0045 (see attached project narrative) Project: Status: Under Review App Date: 11/8/2024 Exp Date: Complete Date: Assigned To:Tyler Corey Note Created By Date Created COMPLETENESS REVIEW v1 (comments due 11/27) [Digital Plan Routing] Building Engineering Fire Utilities Walter Oetzell 11/13/2024 11:33:12 AM Valuation:$0.00 Square Feet 0.00 Type Name Address City, State Business Applicant 1364 San Marcos Ct San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Representative Cowen Consulting 1250 Coral St San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 8057052652 Printed: 11/13/2024 11:36:31 AM Page 1 of 1 Routing Sheet SBDV-0738-2024 279 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 13, 2024 11:07 AM To:Planning Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Good morning, please send a payment link for application/ review fees at the soonest convenience. Thank you! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Nov 8, 2024, at 10:51 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Good Morning, Please find the attached SB-9 Urban Lot Split application package for the property at 1364 San Marcos Court. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <00. 1364 San Marcos Court Project Narrative.pdf> 280 <01. 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application_Signed.pdf> <02. 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Urban Lot Split Application Checklist.pdf> <03. Tentative Parcel Map SLO 24-0045.pdf> <04. 1364 San Marcos Court Preliminary Title Report.pdf> <05. 1364 San Marcos Court Assessor's Parcel Map.PDF> 281 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2024 12:18 PM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court Hi Ryan, We have a proposal from Steven Foster to replace the existing lateral. Does the work need to be done before we apply for the parcel map in order to qualify for the rebate? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Sep 13, 2024, at 9:11 AM, Beech, Ryan <RBeech@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, Unfortunately, the defect at 104’ 8” needs to be addressed. Please review Muni 13.08.395 section B and let me know if you have any questions. -Ryan From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 5:05 PM To: Beech, Ryan <RBeech@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ryan, 282 The homeowner is concerned about replacing the lateral and we wanted to check in with you on whether replacement would be 100% necessary at this time. I took a another look at the video and at around 1:30 it seems like maybe what we are seeing is the plumber pushing through the ABS to clay transition. Out at 2:57, while there is definitely something on the wall of the pipe, we under the middle of the cul-de-sac/ a few feet from the main, and I was wondering if it could just be some kind of residue that washed back into the lateral from jetting of the main? Would you be willing to take a second look at the video and consider whether it would be possible to allow the existing lateral to continue in service without being replaced at this time? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <Code 13.08.395.pdf> 283 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Wednesday, October 2, 2024 6:32 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2024100203197-000 Original Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2024100203197-000_CTYSLO_Original.GML; 2024100203197-000_CTYSLO_Original.XML; 2024100203197-000.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 2526986 TICKET NO= 2024100203197 TICKET REVISION NO= 000 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= SEQUENCE NO= 18907915 TRANSMISSION ID= 26 SUBMITTED DATE= 2024-10-02T18:31:46-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2024-10-04T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2024-10-04T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2024-10-30T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= 2-4 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= Original TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= UƟlity Work - Private - Owned By Property Owner DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint and Flags EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 2250 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= true PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= 1364 San Marco ct., SLO BORING= false 284 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SLOUSD, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 103863 NAME= Steven Foster COMPANY= AcƟon Rooter STREET ADDRESS= 3940 Broad St, Suite 7424 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93401 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-541-1333 MOBILE= 805-440-2034 EMAIL= info@acƟonrooterplumbing.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta st STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Steven Foster ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8055411333 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269242 LONGITUDE= -120.643198 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Replace sewer from right side of driveway of house to city main in street and install new water serv ice from main to leŌ side of house TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 285 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, September 24, 2024 11:18 AM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2024092401421-000 Original Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2024092401421-000_CTYSLO_Original.GML; 2024092401421-000_CTYSLO_Original.XML; 2024092401421-000.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 2487985 TICKET NO= 2024092401421 TICKET REVISION NO= 000 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= SEQUENCE NO= 18615020 TRANSMISSION ID= 12 SUBMITTED DATE= 2024-09-24T11:17:21-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2024-09-26T17:01:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2024-09-26T17:01:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2024-10-22T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= 2-4 days EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= Original TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= UƟlity Work - Private - Owned By Property Owner DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint and Flags EXCAVATION METHOD= Backhoe/trackhoe/excavator/mini ex PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 48 to 84 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 4148 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= true PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= 1364 San Marcos ct., SLO BORING= false 286 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= SLOUSD, CHASLO, SCGSLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 103863 NAME= Steven Foster COMPANY= AcƟon Rooter STREET ADDRESS= 3940 Broad St, Suite 7424 CITY/TOWN/PLACE= STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93401 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Contractor EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-541-1333 MOBILE= 805-440-2034 EMAIL= info@acƟonrooterplumbing.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta St STREET/SIDEWALK= true SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Steven Foster ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8055411333 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269272 LONGITUDE= -120.643167 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Replace sewer from house to main and install new water service along leŌ side of house TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 287 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, September 13, 2024 3:52 PM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court Hi Ryan, Thanks for taking another look and for your consideration with this. I have asked Steven to give us prices for both scenarios: -Repairing the section at 104’8” -Replacing the entire lateral with HDPE Have a great weekend, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Sep 13, 2024, at 9:11 AM, Beech, Ryan <RBeech@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, Unfortunately, the defect at 104’ 8” needs to be addressed. Please review Muni 13.08.395 section B and let me know if you have any questions. -Ryan From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 5:05 PM To: Beech, Ryan <RBeech@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ryan, 288 The homeowner is concerned about replacing the lateral and we wanted to check in with you on whether replacement would be 100% necessary at this time. I took a another look at the video and at around 1:30 it seems like maybe what we are seeing is the plumber pushing through the ABS to clay transition. Out at 2:57, while there is definitely something on the wall of the pipe, we under the middle of the cul-de-sac/ a few feet from the main, and I was wondering if it could just be some kind of residue that washed back into the lateral from jetting of the main? Would you be willing to take a second look at the video and consider whether it would be possible to allow the existing lateral to continue in service without being replaced at this time? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <Code 13.08.395.pdf> 289 From:Lateral Inspections Sent:Wednesday, September 4, 2024 3:32 PM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // Sewer Inspection Video Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged FYI From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2024 8:57 AM To: Lateral Inspections <lateralinspections@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // Sewer Inspection Video This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ryan, I am presently working on an application to split the lot at 1364 San Marcos Court. This week Steven Foster, with Action Rooter, video inspected the existing ABS/ clay lateral. Can you please take a look at the video and confirm that replacement will not be required in conjunction with the project? Thanks, Brian Video Link: https://youtu.be/w2BmdayAO5g Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 290 291 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, August 26, 2024 12:22 PM To:Lateral Inspections Cc:LaFreniere, Matt Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // Sewer Inspection Video This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ryan, Just wanted to follow up on this request. I will give you a call as well. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Aug 17, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Ryan, I am presently working on an application to split the lot at 1364 San Marcos Court. This week Steven Foster, with Action Rooter, video inspected the existing ABS/ clay lateral. Can you please take a look at the video and confirm that replacement will not be required in conjunction with the project? Thanks, Brian 292 Video Link: https://youtu.be/w2BmdayAO5g Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 293 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, August 20, 2024 4:04 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2024081202909-002 AMND Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2024081202909-002_CTYSLO_AMND.GML; 2024081202909-002_CTYSLO_AMND.XML; 2024081202909-002.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= CSR UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 2341156 TICKET NO= 2024081202909 TICKET REVISION NO= 002 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2024081202909 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 001 SEQUENCE NO= 17498849 TRANSMISSION ID= 27 SUBMITTED DATE= 2024-08-20T16:03:20-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2024-09-09T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= 1 day or less EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= AMND TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Potholing To Confirm UƟlity LocaƟon(s) DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Hand digging PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 12 to 24 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 761 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 294 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SLOUSD, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 148739 NAME= Brian Cowen COMPANY= Cowen ConsulƟng STREET ADDRESS= 1250 Coral Street CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93405 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Homeowner EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-705-2652 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= briancowen@mac.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta Street STREET/SIDEWALK= false SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Brian Cowen ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057052652 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269368 LONGITUDE= -120.643354 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Side Yard PUE TICKET EDIT REASON= **AMENDMENT** aƩenƟon Charter CommunicaƟons - San Luis Obispo, ATT DistribuƟon - California, and Pacifc Gas & Electric The customer requests a field meet, please contact Brian Cowen at 805-705-2652 to schedule.- 08/20/2024 04:03 PM Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 295 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Tuesday, August 20, 2024 3:58 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2024081202909-001 AMND Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2024081202909-001_CTYSLO_AMND.GML; 2024081202909-001_CTYSLO_AMND.XML; 2024081202909-001.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 2341132 TICKET NO= 2024081202909 TICKET REVISION NO= 001 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= 2024081202909 PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= 000 SEQUENCE NO= 17498694 TRANSMISSION ID= 26 SUBMITTED DATE= 2024-08-20T15:57:23-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2024-09-09T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= 1 day or less EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= AMND TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Potholing To Confirm UƟlity LocaƟon(s) DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Hand digging PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 12 to 24 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 761 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= false PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 296 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CHASLO, CTYSLO, PGESLO, SLOUSD, SCGSLO, ATTDNORCAL [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 148739 NAME= Brian Cowen COMPANY= Cowen ConsulƟng STREET ADDRESS= 1250 Coral Street CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93405 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Homeowner EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-705-2652 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= briancowen@mac.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta Street STREET/SIDEWALK= false SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Brian Cowen ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057052652 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269368 LONGITUDE= -120.643354 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Side Yard PUE TICKET EDIT REASON= **AMENDMENT** Tract Improvement Plans Show AT&T, Charter and Possibly PG&E Underground FaciliƟes to Exist in a 5' Wide Side-Yard Public UƟliƟes Easement.-08/20/2024 03:57 PM Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 297 From:Rucker, Jarrett Sent:Tuesday, August 20, 2024 10:15 AM To:Beech, Ryan Subject:FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // Sewer Inspection Video Here is another one for you. It appears to be a plastic upper to a clay lower. From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2024 8:57 AM To: Lateral Inspections <lateralinspections@slocity.org> Cc: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // Sewer Inspection Video This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Ryan, I am presently working on an application to split the lot at 1364 San Marcos Court. This week Steven Foster, with Action Rooter, video inspected the existing ABS/ clay lateral. Can you please take a look at the video and confirm that replacement will not be required in conjunction with the project? Thanks, Brian Video Link: https://youtu.be/w2BmdayAO5g Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 298 From:no_reply@undergroundservicealert.org Sent:Monday, August 12, 2024 5:20 PM To:Smart, Dig Subject:CA TICKET: 2024081202909-000 Original Normal(CTYSLO) Attachments:2024081202909-000_CTYSLO_Original.GML; 2024081202909-000_CTYSLO_Original.XML; 2024081202909-000.GIF Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California 811 // 800-642-2444 www.usanorth811.org Please be advised the person below has requested a locate of underground assets in your jurisdicƟon. You are required to respond within the required Ɵme frame and reference the Ticket Number, Sequence Number and the User Reference (where supplied). [REFERRAL DETAILS] MESSAGE VERSION NO= 1.0.10 FROM= Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California TICKET MEDIUM= WEB UTILITY ID= 20480 STATION CODE= CTYSLO UTILITY NAME= City of San Luis Obispo TO= KURT LONG JOB NO= 2306284 TICKET NO= 2024081202909 TICKET REVISION NO= 000 PREVIOUS TICKET NO= PREVIOUS TICKET REV NO= SEQUENCE NO= 17232606 TRANSMISSION ID= 15 SUBMITTED DATE= 2024-08-12T17:19:36-07:00 WORK BEGIN DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 LEGAL START DATE= 2024-08-20T07:00:00-07:00 TICKET EXPIRATION= 2024-09-09T23:59:59-07:00 WORK DURATION= 1 day or less EMERGENCY= False TICKET STATUS= Original TICKET TYPE= Normal WORK TYPE= ResidenƟal property work WORK ACTIVITY= Potholing To Confirm UƟlity LocaƟon(s) DELINEATED METHOD= White Paint EXCAVATION METHOD= Hand digging PAVEMENT ONLY= false VACUUM EXCAVATION= false ANTICIPATED DEPTH= 12 to 24 inches EXCAVATION SIZE= 761 Sq Ft RESPONSE REQUIRED= true PROJECT OWNER= Homeowner/Property Owner/Tenant/HOA PERMIT= JOB NO/NAME= BORING= false 299 PAVEMENT ONLY= false EXPLOSIVES= false STATION LIST= CTYSLO, SLOUSD, ATTDNORCAL, PGESLO, SCGSLO, CHASLO [CALLER DETAILS] EXCAVATOR ID= 148739 NAME= Brian Cowen COMPANY= Cowen ConsulƟng STREET ADDRESS= 1250 Coral Street CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo STATE= CA ZIPCODE= 93405 EXCAVATOR TYPE= Homeowner EXCAVATOR INDUSTRY= PHONE= 805-705-2652 MOBILE= Not Supplied EMAIL= briancowen@mac.com LANGUAGE= [LOCATION DETAILS] ADDRESS/LOCATION= 1364 San Marcos Ct CITY/TOWN/PLACE= San Luis Obispo COUNTY= San Luis Obispo County STATE= CA NEARBY CROSS STREET= Augusta Street STREET/SIDEWALK= false SUBDIVISION/LOT= ONSITE CONTACT NAME= Brian Cowen ONSITE CONTACT PHONE= 8057052652 ZIPCODE= 93401 LATITUDE= 35.269368 LONGITUDE= -120.643354 EXCAVATOR REMARKS= Side Yard PUE TICKET EDIT REASON= Please DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL as it has been automaƟcally generated and replies are not monitored. Should you wish to advise Underground Service Alert of Northern & Central California of any issues with the aƩached Ɵcket informaƟon, please email info@usanorth811.org 303 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, May 6, 2024 10:19 AM To:Tway, Timothea (Timmi) Cc:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: SB-9 Ruling Hi Timmi, Thank you so much for this information. We will keep on moving forward with the project. Have a wonderful week! Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On May 5, 2024, at 8:49  PM, Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, As of now, this ruling only impacts the jurisdictions that were a part of the lawsuit, it does not change the regulations that are applicable in SLO. If we hear otherwise from our City Attorney’s office at any point we will let you know, Thank you! Timothea (Timmi) Tway Director of Community Development <image001.png> Community Development 919 Palm, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E TTway@slocity.org T 805.781.7187 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 304 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 5:13 PM To: Tway, Timothea (Timmi) <TTway@slocity.org> Cc: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: SB-9 Ruling This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Timmi, We have been working with Walter Oetzell on a potential SB-9 Urban Lot Split for the property at 1364 San Marcos Court, which is presently in the pre-application stage. MBS Surveys is presently working on the Tentative Parcel Map and we expect to have a complete application to submit as soon as next month. The question has come up of whether the recent ruling, regarding the legality of SB-9 and Charter Cities, would impact the feasibility of this project. Does the City have any insight into the situation? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Cowen Consulting Development + Land Use + Project Management CA Registered Civil Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 305 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Monday, April 15, 2024 1:05 PM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Hi Matt, Thanks for advising on this. Hope you guys both have a great week! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Apr 15, 2024, at 9:33 AM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Thank you, Brian. I recommend submitting it as you described and having it go through the review process. Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 2:48 PM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split 306 This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, The easement benefiting the 1364 San Marcos Court property came later and is reflected in the current title report, attached to this message. In 2003, the previous owner of the 1364 San Marcos Court property, Reiss, obtained an Easement in Gross across Parcel C of SLO 81-121. In 2021, the current property owner, Mr. Hatalsky, purchased the easement from Reiss and it now runs with the land as an Easement Appurtenant. See screenshot below. I’ll make sure MBS plots the easement on the TPM and we will include the reference document with the submittal. Is Engineering going to require a maintenance agreement in addition to documentation of the easement? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.jpg> On Apr 12, 2024, at 8:53 AM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please see the attached example common driveway agreement/template for information on requirements. Also attached are reference maps. Here are two additional reference maps:https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_007/PM_007_038_001.pdf https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_008/PM_008_100_001.pdf. I was only able to find that the current shared driveway serves Parcels A, B, and C of Parcel Map SLO 80-121, PM_032_073_001 (attached). Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development 307 Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 8:30 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Walter and I have been talking about the Existing Access Easement & Common Access Driveway that will serve the new lot. Fidelity Title has been unable to locate a Maintenance Agreement on title of the Johnson Avenue properties, so we are presuming that one does not exist. Getting a recorded maintenance agreement in place at this time would require signatures from the three other property owners who share the driveway. Is Engineering going to require a recorded maintenance agreement for the existing driveway in order to approve this SB-9 Lot Split? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <Common Driveway Agreement, 2 party.doc><PM_032_073_001.pdf><PM_012_039_001.pdf><RS_001_014_001.pdf> 308 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, April 12, 2024 2:48 PM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Attachments:24.03.13 1364 San Marcos Court Prelim.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, The easement benefiting the 1364 San Marcos Court property came later and is reflected in the current title report, attached to this message. In 2003, the previous owner of the 1364 San Marcos Court property, Reiss, obtained an Easement in Gross across Parcel C of SLO 81-121. In 2021, the current property owner, Mr. Hatalsky, purchased the easement from Reiss and it now runs with the land as an Easement Appurtenant. See screenshot below. I’ll make sure MBS plots the easement on the TPM and we will include the reference document with the submittal. Is Engineering going to require a maintenance agreement in addition to documentation of the easement? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 309 310 On Apr 12, 2024, at 8:53 AM, LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Please see the attached example common driveway agreement/template for information on requirements. Also attached are reference maps. Here are two additional reference maps:https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_007/PM_007_038_001.pdf https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_008/PM_008_100_001.pdf. I was only able to find that the current shared driveway serves Parcels A, B, and C of Parcel Map SLO 80-121, PM_032_073_001 (attached). Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III <image002.png> Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 8:30 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Walter and I have been talking about the Existing Access Easement & Common Access Driveway that will serve the new lot. Fidelity Title has been unable to locate a Maintenance Agreement on title of the Johnson Avenue properties, so we are presuming that one does not exist. Getting a recorded maintenance agreement in place at this time would require signatures from the three other property owners who share the driveway. 311 Is Engineering going to require a recorded maintenance agreement for the existing driveway in order to approve this SB-9 Lot Split? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> <Common Driveway Agreement, 2 party.doc><PM_032_073_001.pdf><PM_012_039_001.pdf><RS_001_014_001.pdf> CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 1 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Countersigned By: Authorized Officer or Agent Michael J. Nolan, President Attest: Marjorie Nemzura, Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 2 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com ISSUING OFFICE: 1234 Monterey Street, Suite 110, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Title Officer: Reece Benson Email: rbenson@fnf.com Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB TO:Paul Hatalsky - C/O Development + Land Use Consulting 1364 San Marcos Court San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Attn: Brian Cowen PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES):1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2024 at 07:30 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Parcel Map 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee as to Parcel(s) 1 Easement(s) more fully described below as to Parcel(s) 2 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 3 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41' WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 255 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF JOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 4 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2024-2025. 2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area: 003-000 Tax ID No.: 004-782-081 Fiscal Year: 2023-2024 1st Installment: $4,391.19, Delinquent + Penalty $439.11 2nd Installment: $4,391.19, Open Exemption: $7,000.00 Land:$452,421.00 Improvements: $348,016.00 Personal Property: $0.00 Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 3. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 4. All taxes or assessments approved, levied or enacted by the State, County, Municipality, Township or similar taxing authority, which are not yet due and payable, including but not limited to any retroactive increases in taxes or assessments resulting from any retroactive increase in the valuation of the land by the State, County, Municipality, Township, or other taxing authority. Any possible charges or assessments for water bills, public utilities, code enforcement and sanitary bills which may exist, but have not yet been recorded and/or filed. 5. Any liens or other assessments, bonds, or special district liens including without limitation, Community Facility Districts, that arise by reason of any local, City, Municipal or County Project or Special District. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 5 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: M. N. Goldtree, et ux Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 25, 1941 Recording No.: Book 303, Page 172, of Official Records Affects:The Southwesterly 5 feet of said land 7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon age, race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, veteran or military status, genetic information, medical condition, citizenship, primary language, and immigration status, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable laws, as set forth in the document referred to in the numbered item last above shown. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or trust deed made in good faith and for value. 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Lines of poles and incidental purposes Recording No.: Book 306, Page 150, of Official Records Affects:Southwesterly line 9. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Purpose:Public utilities Affects:Southwesterly 5 feet of Parcel 1 10. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: March 2, 1987 Recording No.: 13935, Book 2958, Page 678, of Official Records Affects:Northwesterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 6 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 Reference is made to said document for full particulars 11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation and Pacific Bell Company, a California corporation Purpose:Public utilities Recording Date: July 27, 1989 Recording No.: 50559, Book 3356, Page 600, of Official Records Affects:Southeasterly 5 feet of said land Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the easement document shown hereinabove. Reference is made to said document for full particulars 12. Matters contained in that certain document Entitled:Option Agreement Dated:December 29, 1998 Executed by: Frank & Marilee Taylor, "Optionor" and Jerry M. Reiss and Collette Reiss, "Optionee" Recording Date: December 31, 1998 Recording No.: 1998-087987, of Official Records Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. Quitclaim of Option Rights recorded on February 14, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008007408, of Official Records. 13. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Jerry M. Reiss and Collette M. Reiss, husband and wife as community property Purpose:Ingress, egress, driveway and underground utilities Recording Date: December 1, 2003 Recording No.: 2003136913, of Official Records Affects:Said land and Re-Recording Date:December 24, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003144641, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB EXCEPTIONS (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 7 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 and Re-Recording Date:December 31, 2003 and Re-Recording No.: 2003146088, of Official Records Reason:To correct the description of the easement granted in the document recorded 12/01/2003 as document no. 2003136913. Assignment of Grant of Easement recorded of November 12, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021075598, of Official Records. 14. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount:$591,000.00 Dated:January 29, 2002 Trustor/Grantor: Paul Hatalsky, an unmarried man Trustee:Fidelity National Title Company Beneficiary: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), solely as nominee for Guaranteed Rate, Inc., a Delaware corporation Loan No.: 203438356 Recording Date: February 3, 2021 Recording No.: 2021008336, of Official Records END OF EXCEPTIONS Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 8 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 NOTES Note 1.Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 2.Pursuant to Government Code Section 27388.1, as amended and effective as of 1-1-2018, a Documentary Transfer Tax (DTT) Affidavit may be required to be completed and submitted with each document when DTT is being paid or when an exemption is being claimed from paying the tax. If a governmental agency is a party to the document, the form will not be required. DTT Affidavits may be available at a Tax Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder. Note 3.Note: The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach CLTA Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said Land a Single Family Residence, known as 1364 San Marcos Court, San Luis Obispo, California, to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy. Note 4.Note: There are NO conveyances affecting said Land recorded within 24 months of the date of this report. Note 5.If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate agent or association provides a copy of the declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold faced typed and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6.The application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. The proposed Insured must confirm that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land requested to be insured. If the legal description is incorrect, the proposed Insured must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the legal description for the intended parcel(s) of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 7.Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report. Title No.: FSLC-512400177-RB NOTES (continued) CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.23 9 CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177 Note 8.The following Exclusion(s) are added to preliminary reports, commitments and will be included as an endorsement in the following policies A.2006 ALTA Owner's Policy (06-17-06). 6.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. B.2006 ALTA Loan Policy (06-17-06). 8. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 9.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. C.ALTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13) and CLTA Homeowner's Policy of Title Insurance (12-02-13). 10.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. D.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 12.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the Public Records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a Tribe or on behalf of its members. 13.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage based on the application of a Tribe's law resulting from the failure of the Insured Mortgage to specify State law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the Insured Mortgage. E.ALTA Expanded Coverage Residential Loan Policy - Assessments Priority (04-02-15). 7.Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, notices, or other matters not appearing in the public records but that would be disclosed by an examination of any records maintained by or on behalf of a tribe or on behalf of its members. 8.Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability, or lack of priority of the lien of the insured mortgage based on the application of a tribe's law resulting from the failure of the insured mortgage to specify state law as the governing law with respect to the lien of the insured mortgage. END OF NOTES Wire Fraud Alert Original Effective Date: 5/11/2017 Current Version Date: 5/11/2017 FSLC-512400177 - WIRE0016 (DSI Rev. 12/07/17) TM and © Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and/or an affiliate. All rights reserved WIRE FRAUD ALERT This Notice is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. If you have any questions, please consult with a lawyer. All parties to a real estate transaction are targets for wire fraud and many have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars because they simply relied on the wire instructions received via email, without further verification. If funds are to be wired in conjunction with this real estate transaction, we strongly recommend verbal verification of wire instructions through a known, trusted phone number prior to sending funds. In addition, the following non-exclusive self-protection strategies are recommended to minimize exposure to possible wire fraud. NEVER RELY on emails purporting to change wire instructions. Parties to a transaction rarely change wire instructions in the course of a transaction. ALWAYS VERIFY wire instructions, specifically the ABA routing number and account number, by calling the party who sent the instructions to you. DO NOT use the phone number provided in the email containing the instructions, use phone numbers you have called before or can otherwise verify. Obtain the number of relevant parties to the transaction as soon as an escrow account is opened. DO NOT send an email to verify as the email address may be incorrect or the email may be intercepted by the fraudster. USE COMPLEX EMAIL PASSWORDS that employ a combination of mixed case, numbers, and symbols. Make your passwords greater than eight (8) characters. Also, change your password often and do NOT reuse the same password for other online accounts. USE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION for email accounts. Your email provider or IT staff may have specific instructions on how to implement this feature. For more information on wire-fraud scams or to report an incident, please refer to the following links: Federal Bureau of Investigation:Internet Crime Complaint Center: http://www.fbi.gov http://www.ic3.gov Privacy Statement Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective December 1, 2023 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF," "our," or "we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect personal information, when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use and disclosure of that information. A limited number of FNF subsidiaries have their own privacy notices. If a subsidiary has its own privacy notice, the privacy notice will be available on the subsidiary's website and this Privacy Notice does not apply. Collection of Personal Information FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); identity information (e.g. Social Security Number, driver's license, passport, or other government ID number); financial account information (e.g. loan or bank account information); and other personal information necessary to provide products or services to you. We may collect Personal Information about you from: information we receive from you or your agent; information about your transactions with FNF, our affiliates, or others; and information we receive from consumer reporting agencies and/or governmental entities, either directly from these entities or through others. Collection of Browsing Information FNF automatically collects the following types of Browsing Information when you access an FNF website, online service, or application (each an "FNF Website") from your Internet browser, computer, and/or device: Internet Protocol (IP) address and operating system; browser version, language, and type; domain name system requests; and browsing history on the FNF Website, such as date and time of your visit to the FNF Website and visits to the pages within the FNF Website. Like most websites, our servers automatically log each visitor to the FNF Website and may collect the Browsing Information described above. We use Browsing Information for system administration, troubleshooting, fraud investigation, and to improve our websites. Browsing Information generally does not reveal anything personal about you, though if you have created a user account for an FNF Website and are logged into that account, the FNF Website may be able to link certain browsing activity to your user account. Other Online Specifics Cookies. When you visit an FNF Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. Information gathered using cookies helps us improve your user experience. For example, a cookie can help the website load properly or can customize the display page based on your browser type and user preferences. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings. Be aware that doing so may impair or limit some functionality of the FNF Website. Web Beacons. We use web beacons to determine when and how many times a page has been viewed. This information is used to improve our websites. Do Not Track. Currently our FNF Websites do not respond to "Do Not Track" features enabled through your browser. Privacy Statement Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 Links to Other Sites. FNF Websites may contain links to unaffiliated third-party websites. FNF is not responsible for the privacy practices or content of those websites. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of every website you visit. Use of Personal Information FNF uses Personal Information for these main purposes: To provide products and services to you or in connection with a transaction involving you. To improve our products and services. To communicate with you about our, our affiliates', and others' products and services, jointly or independently. To provide reviews and testimonials about our services, with your consent. When Information Is Disclosed We may disclose your Personal Information and Browsing Information in the following circumstances: to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; to affiliated or nonaffiliated service providers who provide or perform services or functions on our behalf and who agree to use the information only to provide such services or functions; to affiliated or nonaffiliated third parties with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to jointly market financial products or services to you; to law enforcement or authorities in connection with an investigation, or in response to a subpoena or court order; or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to comply with legal process or applicable laws, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF, its customers, or the public. The law does not require your prior authorization and does not allow you to restrict the disclosures described above. Additionally, we may disclose your information to third parties for whom you have given us authorization or consent to make such disclosure. We do not otherwise share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as required or permitted by law. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership, or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. Security of Your Information We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. For additional information about your California privacy rights, please visit the "California Privacy" link on our website (https://fnf.com/pages/californiaprivacy.aspx) or call (888) 413-1748. For Connecticut Residents: For additional information about your Connecticut consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or to appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. For Colorado Residents: For additional information about your Colorado consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Privacy Statement Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 For Nevada Residents: We are providing this notice pursuant to state law. You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling FNF Privacy at (888) 714-2710 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. For further information concerning Nevada's telephone solicitation law, you may contact: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: aginquiries@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information or Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For Utah Residents: For additional information about your Utah consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, please call (888) 714-2710. For Vermont Residents: We will not disclose information about your creditworthiness to our affiliates and will not disclose your personal information, financial information, credit report, or health information to nonaffiliated third parties to market to you, other than as permitted by Vermont law, unless you authorize us to make those disclosures. For Virginia Residents: For additional information about your Virginia consumer privacy rights, or to make a consumer privacy request, or appeal a previous privacy request, please email privacy@fnf.com or call (888) 714-2710. Information From Children The FNF Websites are not intended or designed to attract persons under the age of eighteen (18). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States and choose to provide Personal Information or Browsing Information to us, please note that we may transfer that information outside of your country of residence. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection, transfer, and use of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. FNF Website Services for Mortgage Loans Certain FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers, including hosting websites that collect customer information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers (the "Service Websites"). The Service Websites may contain links to both this Privacy Notice and the mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice. The sections of this Privacy Notice titled When Information is Disclosed, Choices with Your Information, and Accessing and Correcting Information do not apply to the Service Websites. The mortgage loan servicer or lender's privacy notice governs use, disclosure, and access to your Personal Information. FNF does not share Personal Information collected through the Service Websites, except as required or authorized by contract with the mortgage loan servicer or lender, or as required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary: to comply with a legal process or applicable law, to enforce this Privacy Notice, or to protect the rights, property, or safety of FNF or the public. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice; Notice Changes By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. We may change this Privacy Notice at any time. The Privacy Notice's effective date will show the last date changes were made. If you provide information to us following any change of the Privacy Notice, that signifies your assent to and acceptance of the changes to the Privacy Notice. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions or would like to correct your Personal Information, visit FNF's Privacy Inquiry Website or contact us by phone at (888) 714-2710, by email at privacy@fnf.com, or by mail to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer Privacy Statement Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc ----FSLC-512400177 ATTACHMENT ONE Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 (11-09-18) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material unless such lien is shown by the public records at Date of Policy. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE - SCHEDULE B, PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE OWNER'S POLICY (02-04-22) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7 Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: PART I 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. PART II (Variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., are inserted here) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (7-01-21) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy and We will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, or regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23, or 27. 2. Any power to take the Land by condemnation. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 17. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by You; b. not Known to Us, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to You and not disclosed in writing to Us by You prior to the date You became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to You; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 8.f., 25, 26, 27, 28, or 32); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if You paid consideration sufficient to qualify You as a bona fide purchaser of the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A; and b. in any street, road, avenue, alley, lane, right-of-way, body of water, or waterway that abut the Land. Exclusion 4 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11 or 21. 5. The failure of Your existing structures, or any portion of Your existing structures, to have been constructed before, on, or after the Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 14 or 15. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transfer of the Title to You is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 30. 7. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake, or subsidence. 8. Negligence by a person or an entity exercising a right to extract or develop oil, gas, minerals, groundwater, or any other subsurface substance. 9. Any lien on Your Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 9 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8.a or 27. 10. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) CLTA/ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws. 8. Contamination, explosion, fire, flooding, vibration, fracturing, earthquake or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals, water, or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows: •For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 10,000.00 Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 19: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) $ 25,000.00 Covered Risk 21: 1.00% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $ 5,000.00 ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (07-01-2021) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: i. the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; ii. the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement on the Land; iii. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remediation or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, regulatory, or national security power. c. the effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1.a. or 1.b. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 2 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter: a. created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; b. not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; c. resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Policy (Exclusion 3.d. does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 or 10); or e. resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if consideration sufficient to qualify the Insured named in Schedule A as a bona fide purchaser had been given for the Title at the Date of Policy. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: i. to the extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new value; or ii. for any other reason not stated in Covered Risk 9.b. 5. Any claim of a PACA-PSA Trust. Exclusion 5 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 8. 6. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments, imposed or collected by a governmental authority that becomes due and payable after the Date of Policy. Exclusion 6 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 2.b. 7. Any discrepancy in the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the Land. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Some historical land records contain Discriminatory Covenants that are illegal and unenforceable by law. This policy treats any Discriminatory Covenant in a document referenced in Schedule B as if each Discriminatory Covenant is redacted, repudiated, removed, and not republished or recirculated. Only the remaining provisions of the document are excepted from coverage. This policy does not insure against loss or damage and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses resulting from the terms and conditions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and the following matters: NOTE: The 2021 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) Attachment One (11/04/22) 2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: NOTE: The 2006 ALTA Owner’s Policy may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to variable exceptions such as taxes, easements, CC&R’s, etc., the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the Western Regional Standard Coverage Exceptions listed below as 1 through 7 below: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy but that could be (a) ascertained by an inspection of the Land, or (b) asserted by persons or parties in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, easement, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy.] 7. Any claim to (a) ownership of or rights to minerals and similar substances, including but not limited to ores, metals, coal, lignite, oil, gas, uranium, clay, rock, sand, and gravel located in, on, or under the Land or produced from the Land, whether such ownership or rights arise by lease, grant, exception, conveyance, reservation, or otherwise; and (b) any rights, privileges, immunities, rights of way, and easements associated therewith or appurtenant thereto, whether or not the interests or rights excepted in (a) or (b) appear in the Public Records or are shown in Schedule B. Notice of Available Discounts Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 03.22.24 @ 10:44 AM by RB SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 07.10.19 ----FSLC-512400177 Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC - Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company FNTC - Fidelity National Title Company of California FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Company FNTCCA - Fidelity National Title Company of California FNTIC - Fidelity National Title Insurance Company TICOR - Ticor Title Company of California CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company LTC - Lawyer's Title Company CLTIC - Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company SLTC - ServiceLink Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company Available Discounts DISASTER LOANS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) The charge for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended coverage) covering the financing or refinancing by an owner of record, within twenty-four (24) months of the date of a declaration of a disaster area by the government of the United States or the State of California on any land located in said area, which was partially or totally destroyed in the disaster, will be fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate. CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC, FNTIC) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be forty percent (40%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. 312 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Friday, April 12, 2024 8:54 AM To:Brian Cowen Cc:Oetzell, Walter Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Attachments:Common Driveway Agreement, 2 party.doc; PM_032_073_001.pdf; PM_012_039_001.pdf; RS_001 _014_001.pdf Hi Brian, Please see the attached example common driveway agreement/template for information on requirements. Also attached are reference maps. Here are two additional reference maps: https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_007/PM_007_038_001.pdf https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_008/PM_008_100_001.pdf. I was only able to find that the current shared driveway serves Parcels A, B, and C of Parcel Map SLO 80-121, PM_032_073_001 (attached). Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 8:30 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Cc: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Walter and I have been talking about the Existing Access Easement & Common Access Driveway that will serve the new lot. Fidelity Title has been unable to locate a Maintenance Agreement on title of the Johnson Avenue properties, so we are presuming that one does not exist. 313 Getting a recorded maintenance agreement in place at this time would require signatures from the three other property owners who share the driveway. Is Engineering going to require a recorded maintenance agreement for the existing driveway in order to approve this SB-9 Lot Split? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 No fee pursuant to Government Code § 6103 No Documentary Transfer Tax per R&T Code § 11922 No Recording Fee per Government Code § 27383 GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT FOR COMMON DRIVEWAY (One Easement, Two Parties) A. ________________ is the owner of that property at ___________, San Luis Obispo, California, also known as (legal description) _____________________. B. ___________________ are the owners of that property at _______________, San Luis Obispo, California, also known as (legal description ______________________. C. The purpose of the Common driveway is for vehicular driveway purposes only, to be used as a common driveway over the real property described above. 1. _______________ do hereby grant a reciprocal easement for a common driveway over the area described as Easement #1, as shown and described on attached Exhibit "A". 2. The parties understand that the City of San Luis Obispo cannot regulate vehicle usage or hazards upon said common driveway and agree jointly and individually, to defend and hold the City of San Luis Obispo harmless from all claims for damages or liabilities arising from the alleged failure of the City of San Luis Obispo to regulate vehicles or to provide protection from hazards upon said driveway. 3. The parties agree to provide perpetual maintenance and repair of all parts of the common-access driveway and parking lot. 4. The parties agree that parking on the commonly used portions of the driveway is prohibited. 5. The parties understand that they may use vehicle removing authority granted private property owners in Section 22658 of the California Vehicle Code when any vehicle is parked in the common-access driveway so as to impede, restrict or prevent entry of access to a parcel of the parcels served thereby. 6. The parties agree that if this agreement is abandoned or dissolved, the subject lot served by the common access driveway shall be provided with standard access as required by the City Subdivision Regulations. Grant of Easement and Agreement for Common Driveway (One Easement, Two Parties) Page 2 7. The parties agree that this easement is superior and paramount to the rights of any of the parties in the respective servient estates so created, and that it is a covenant running with the land. 8. As required by the city, additional information is attached to this grant of easement and incorporated by reference as . (If none is required, write "none".) _____________________ _____________________________________ Date Owner _____________________________________ Print Name _____________________ _____________________________________ Date Owner _____________________________________ Print Name _____________________ __________________________________________ Date City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Dept. By: Tyler Corey, Deputy Director All signatures must be notarized Grant of Easement and Agreement for Common Driveway (One Easement, Two Parties) Page 3 State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On___________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, _____________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above State of California } County of San Luis Obispo } On________________, before me,__________________________________________, Date Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared, _____________________________________________________, Name of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. Grant of Easement and Agreement for Common Driveway (One Easement, Two Parties) Page 4 Beneficiary’s Consent to Grant of Easement and Agreement is the Beneficiary under Deed of Trust dated executed by , recorded as Instrument Number of Official Records, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California. The Deed of Trust encumbers the real property described in the attached "GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT FOR COMMON DRIVEWAY" (The "Agreement"). As the Beneficiary of said Deed of Trust, Beneficiary hereby consents to the execution and recordation of the Agreement, and agrees that upon recordation of said Agreement, Trustee's and Beneficiary's interests in said real property shall be subordinate to the Agreement. ______________________________________________________________________ Date Beneficiary ______________________________________________________________________ Date Beneficiary ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED. BENEFICIARY MUST SIGN STATEMENT. TRUSTEE CANNOT SIGN ON BEHALF OF BENEFICIARY. Grant of Easement and Agreement for Common Driveway (One Easement, Two Parties) Page 5 Attach Exhibit “A” showing common driveway easement. A legal description with surveyor’s (or authorized engineer’s) signature to be included with Exhibit “A” unless this agreement is being recorded concurrently with a map and that map is referenced in the easement document. 314 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, April 12, 2024 8:30 AM To:LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Oetzell, Walter Subject:1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Attachments:24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Matt, Walter and I have been talking about the Existing Access Easement & Common Access Driveway that will serve the new lot. Fidelity Title has been unable to locate a Maintenance Agreement on title of the Johnson Avenue properties, so we are presuming that one does not exist. Getting a recorded maintenance agreement in place at this time would require signatures from the three other property owners who share the driveway. Is Engineering going to require a recorded maintenance agreement for the existing driveway in order to approve this SB-9 Lot Split? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 315 EXHIBIT "A"Legal DescriptionCLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.20.24 @ 11:53 PM by SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.233CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTYOF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12,PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SANLUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAPRECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLYALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41'WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TOTHE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THESOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOSTSOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OFPARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDINGTO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCENORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THENORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLYCORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, ADISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WESTALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDEDSEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY ANDUNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 225 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OFJOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121,IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THERECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.EASEMENT 316 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, April 11, 2024 5:02 PM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Thanks Walter, I’ll check in with Matt LaFreniere. I think it would be in all of the property owner’s interest to have a maintenance agreement in place. I just don’t know what to do if one or more of the other owners was unwilling to sign on…. Have a great evening! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Apr 11, 2024, at 4:47 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I’m not really sure. But I think that the City’s primary concern is that an easement exists for access and that the parties to the easement are responsible for its maintenance, and that’s part of the standard language in the common access easement agreements I’ve seen here. I don’t think that extends to the particular details of how the maintenance is accomplished, so long as the parties’ responsibility of to maintain it is established, acknowledged, and agreed. Our Engineering staff may be able to provide a more exact answer to that, if needed. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org 317 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 1:54 PM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, I appreciate you checking the file and with Engineering for the document. Is the City going to require a recorded maintenance agreement for the driveway in order to approve this SB-9 lot split? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Apr 10, 2024, at 12:50 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, I’ve checked our address files and did not find any such agreement. I also queried our Engineering staff, who did not find anything like that. It may be that the City doesn’t involve itself with the particular terms of driveway maintenance, so long as damage is repaired; at least my initial guess… -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:29 PM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, Based on research done by Fidelity Title, it appears that a driveway maintenance agreement may not have been previously recorded for the existing common access driveway. Does the City have anything on file? 318 The driveway is located on the property at 2685 Johnson Avenue, APN 004-784-030 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Walter, Thank you for your consideration with this. Based on what I have seen, access width and number of lots served were the only needed exceptions. I will have the surveyor prepare the tentative map and we will submit it for review. Hope you have a great weekend! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 319 On Mar 29, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, I reviewed the information briefly with my supervisor, and we concluded that since the easement appeared to represent a very minor deviation from standards for access with and number of lots served, and was an existing situation that was not exacerbating a related nonconformity, that we did not find a basis to require a great deal of additional study or processing of exception request, such as requiring some manner of discretionary review, to handle any concern about those aspects of the proposal. It would be reviewed through our normal (ministerial) process for “Urban Lot Split” proposals, and we would review the proposal in light of the unusual circumstances relating to the existing easement here, as discussed. Admittedly, we did not review the proposal in great detail, and were focused on the matter of the access width and number of lots served, so this should not be taken as a positive indication on the lot split as a whole. If I’m missing anything critical in regards to nonconformities or exceptions that you hoped would be addressed, do let me know. Hopefully this is helpful information. Feel free to contact me if I may be of further assistance. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:15 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond Hi Walter, Hope you’re having a great day! Just following up on the 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Concept. Thanks, Brian 320 Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 321 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf> 322 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2024 1:46 PM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting Hi Mallory, Thanks for following up on this. We ended up meeting with Walter at the counter a few weeks ago, as well as Engineering and Fire. The project is a go and we have MBS drawing it up right now. Have a great day! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Apr 10, 2024, at 1:02 PM, Patino, Mallory <mpatino@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, Apologies on the delay in this response, especially given it has passed when you were hoping to have a meeting. Were you still interested in discussing SB-9 lot split at 1364 San Marcos Ct, or have you been able to get something scheduled? For information, when you apply for a pre-application meeting, the meetings are generally scheduled sometime between 4 to 8 weeks after the fees are paid. Cheers, Mallory Patino pronouns she/her/hers Assistant Planner <image002.png> Community Development 919 Palm St, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 P (805) 783-7704 E mpatino@slocity.org slocity.org 323 From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 12:56 PM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveill@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Brian, I am working with the owner/ resident of 1364 San Marcos Court on an application to subdivide the property. We would like to schedule a pre-application meeting with Planning, for the week of March 18th if possible. The property is over 1/3 of an acre and zoned R-1. We think it is a good candidate for an SB-9 Urban Lot Split. We would ask that representatives from Engineering and Fire be included in the meeting. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> 324 From:Oetzell, Walter Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2024 12:50 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hello Brian, I’ve checked our address files and did not find any such agreement. I also queried our Engineering staff, who did not find anything like that. It may be that the City doesn’t involve itself with the particular terms of driveway maintenance, so long as damage is repaired; at least my initial guess… -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:29 PM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, Based on research done by Fidelity Title, it appears that a driveway maintenance agreement may not have been previously recorded for the existing common access driveway. Does the City have anything on file? The driveway is located on the property at 2685 Johnson Avenue, APN 004-784-030 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Walter, 325 Thank you for your consideration with this. Based on what I have seen, access width and number of lots served were the only needed exceptions. I will have the surveyor prepare the tentative map and we will submit it for review. Hope you have a great weekend! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, I reviewed the information briefly with my supervisor, and we concluded that since the easement appeared to represent a very minor deviation from standards for access with and number of lots served, and was an existing situation that was not exacerbating a related nonconformity, that we did not find a basis to require a great deal of additional study or processing of exception request, such as requiring some manner of discretionary review, to handle any concern about those aspects of the proposal. It would be reviewed through our normal (ministerial) process for “Urban Lot Split” proposals, and we would review the proposal in light of the unusual circumstances relating to the existing easement here, as discussed. Admittedly, we did not review the proposal in great detail, and were focused on the matter of the access width and number of lots served, so this should not be taken as a positive indication on the lot split as a whole. If I’m missing anything critical in regards to nonconformities or exceptions that you hoped would be addressed, do let me know. Hopefully this is helpful information. Feel free to contact me if I may be of further assistance. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:15 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. 326 Hi Walter, Hope you’re having a great day! Just following up on the 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Concept. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. 327 Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf> 328 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2024 10:54 AM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, I also did not see a shared driveway agreement for Parcels A, B, and C. Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: LaFreniere, Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 9:57 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: RE: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, The attached documents and the links below are the reference maps. https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_007/PM_007_038_001.pdf https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_008/PM_008_100_001.pdf Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III 329 Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:34 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Matt, Would Engineering have information about recorded driveway maintenance agreements, such as the property referenced below? -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:29 PM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, Based on research done by Fidelity Title, it appears that a driveway maintenance agreement may not have been previously recorded for the existing common access driveway. Does the City have anything on file? The driveway is located on the property at 2685 Johnson Avenue, APN 004-784-030 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: 330 Hi Walter, Thank you for your consideration with this. Based on what I have seen, access width and number of lots served were the only needed exceptions. I will have the surveyor prepare the tentative map and we will submit it for review. Hope you have a great weekend! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, I reviewed the information briefly with my supervisor, and we concluded that since the easement appeared to represent a very minor deviation from standards for access with and number of lots served, and was an existing situation that was not exacerbating a related nonconformity, that we did not find a basis to require a great deal of additional study or processing of exception request, such as requiring some manner of discretionary review, to handle any concern about those aspects of the proposal. It would be reviewed through our normal (ministerial) process for “Urban Lot Split” proposals, and we would review the proposal in light of the unusual circumstances relating to the existing easement here, as discussed. Admittedly, we did not review the proposal in great detail, and were focused on the matter of the access width and number of lots served, so this should not be taken as a positive indication on the lot split as a whole. If I’m missing anything critical in regards to nonconformities or exceptions that you hoped would be addressed, do let me know. Hopefully this is helpful information. Feel free to contact me if I may be of further assistance. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:15 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. 331 Hi Walter, Hope you’re having a great day! Just following up on the 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Concept. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, 332 Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf> 333 From:LaFreniere, Matt Sent:Wednesday, April 10, 2024 9:57 AM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Attachments:PM_032_073_001.pdf; PM_012_039_001.pdf; RS_001_014_001.pdf Hi Walter, The attached documents and the links below are the reference maps. https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_007/PM_007_038_001.pdf https://slocountypwd.org/MapFiles/PM/PM_008/PM_008_100_001.pdf Thank you, Matt LaFreniere pronouns he/him/his Engineering Technician III Community Development Engineering Development Review 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E mlafreni@slocity.org T 805.781.7015 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:34 AM To: LaFreniere, Matt <mlafreni@slocity.org> Subject: FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Matt, Would Engineering have information about recorded driveway maintenance agreements, such as the property referenced below? -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:29 PM 334 To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, Based on research done by Fidelity Title, it appears that a driveway maintenance agreement may not have been previously recorded for the existing common access driveway. Does the City have anything on file? The driveway is located on the property at 2685 Johnson Avenue, APN 004-784-030 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 3:09 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Walter, Thank you for your consideration with this. Based on what I have seen, access width and number of lots served were the only needed exceptions. I will have the surveyor prepare the tentative map and we will submit it for review. Hope you have a great weekend! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, 335 I reviewed the information briefly with my supervisor, and we concluded that since the easement appeared to represent a very minor deviation from standards for access with and number of lots served, and was an existing situation that was not exacerbating a related nonconformity, that we did not find a basis to require a great deal of additional study or processing of exception request, such as requiring some manner of discretionary review, to handle any concern about those aspects of the proposal. It would be reviewed through our normal (ministerial) process for “Urban Lot Split” proposals, and we would review the proposal in light of the unusual circumstances relating to the existing easement here, as discussed. Admittedly, we did not review the proposal in great detail, and were focused on the matter of the access width and number of lots served, so this should not be taken as a positive indication on the lot split as a whole. If I’m missing anything critical in regards to nonconformities or exceptions that you hoped would be addressed, do let me know. Hopefully this is helpful information. Feel free to contact me if I may be of further assistance. -- Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:15 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Walter, Hope you’re having a great day! Just following up on the 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Concept. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, 336 Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf> 337 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, April 9, 2024 10:08 AM To:Trees Subject:1364 San Marcos Court // Tree Removal Permit This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Good Morning, I working on a tree removal application for the large eucalyptus tree from the rear yard at 1364 San Marcos Court. It is a nuisance to the immediate neighbor and they have been asking for it to be removed for years. We also plan to submit a building permit application for a new home at the rear of the property later this year. However, the new home will be located outside of the drip line of the existing tree. Should the application for tree removal be “Minor Ministerial” or “Convenience Removal”? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 338 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Friday, March 29, 2024 3:09 PM To:Oetzell, Walter Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Hi Walter, Thank you for your consideration with this. Based on what I have seen, access width and number of lots served were the only needed exceptions. I will have the surveyor prepare the tentative map and we will submit it for review. Hope you have a great weekend! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 29, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> wrote: Hello Brian, I reviewed the information briefly with my supervisor, and we concluded that since the easement appeared to represent a very minor deviation from standards for access with and number of lots served, and was an existing situation that was not exacerbating a related nonconformity, that we did not find a basis to require a great deal of additional study or processing of exception request, such as requiring some manner of discretionary review, to handle any concern about those aspects of the proposal. It would be reviewed through our normal (ministerial) process for “Urban Lot Split” proposals, and we would review the proposal in light of the unusual circumstances relating to the existing easement here, as discussed. Admittedly, we did not review the proposal in great detail, and were focused on the matter of the access width and number of lots served, so this should not be taken as a positive indication on the lot split as a whole. If I’m missing anything critical in regards to nonconformities or exceptions that you hoped would be addressed, do let me know. Hopefully this is helpful information. Feel free to contact me if I may be of further assistance. -- 339 Walter Oetzell Assistant Planner (805) 781-7593 | woetzell@slocity.org From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 11:15 AM To: Oetzell, Walter <woetzell@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Walter, Hope you’re having a great day! Just following up on the 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split Concept. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 21, 2024, at 2:18 PM, Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> wrote: Hi Everyone, Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. 340 Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf> 341 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2024 2:28 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:San Marcos Court SB-9 Lot Split // Hose Pull Analysis Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Appreciate you meeting with us this morning. The distance between the existing hydrant on San Marcos Court and existing Dry Standpipe along the the Easement Driveway measures out to less than 300’. Please take a look at the attached exhibit and let me know if there is any additional information I can provide, that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 342 343 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2024 2:18 PM To:Oetzell, Walter; Hutchinson, Julianna; La Chaine, Steve; LaFreniere, Matt Cc:Paul Hatalsky Subject:1364 San Marcos Court // SB-9 Parcel Map Concept Attachments:24.03.21 1364 San Marcos Court SB-9 Parcel Map Concept.pdf Categories:_5 Inquiries (Public) This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Everyone, Thanks for meeting with us this morning. We are excited about this project and glad to see a key piece of infill property going to use to provide for much needed additional housing in the City. It is our understanding that the project meets the criteria to be processed ministerially under SB-9 and the City’s Urban Lot Split Ordinance. It seems like the project would need to request some consideration from City staff regarding access, as the existing recorded access easement that will serve the new parcel, is 19’ wide rather than the required 20’. We are prepared to engage MBS to prepare the tentative parcel map package and make a formal submittal. Before we do that however, we would appreciate City staff looking at the attached documents, discussing as needed, and providing us with an indication of what the path would be for the project to support the necessary findings for the Community Development Director to grant the needed exception(s) to the objective standards. 1. SB-9 Lot Split Concept 2. Existing Easement Exhibit 3. Photo of Existing Easement Access from Johnson Avenue 4. Fire Department Hose Pull Analysis 5. Screenshot of Legal Description of Easement from Current Title Report. Please let me know if we can provide any additional information that would be helpful at this time. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer 344 San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 EXHIBIT "A"Legal DescriptionCLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11.17.06)Printed: 03.20.24 @ 11:53 PM by SCA0002402.doc / Updated: 08.09.233CA-FT-FSLC-01500.074051-SPS-1-24-FSLC-512400177For APN/Parcel ID(s):004-782-081THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTYOF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PARCEL 1: PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUISOBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12,PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING: THAT PORTION OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 3 OF THE GOLDTREE VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SANLUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAPRECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1893 IN BOOK 1, PAGE 14 OF SURVEY MAPS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLYALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 SOUTH 53°50'00" WEST (REC-SOUTH 53°41'WEST), 230.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TOTHE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THESOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, 132.89 FEET TO THE MOSTSOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 17, AND BEING THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT A OFPARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDINGTO MAP RECORDED AUGUST 17, 1973 IN BOOK 12, PAGE 39 OF PARCEL MAPS; THENCENORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17, ALSO BEING THENORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A OF PARCEL MAP SLO 73-341, TO THE MOST NORTHERLYCORNER OF SAID LOT A; ALSO BEING A POINT ON A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 36°15'00" EAST, ADISTANCE OF 132.71 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 36°15'00" WESTALONG SAID LINE 132.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS LEGAL IS MADE PURSUANT TO THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDEDSEPTEMBER 19, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-60624 IN BOOK 2887, PAGE 179 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF INGRESS, EGRESS, DRIVEWAY ANDUNDERGROUND UTILITIES, OVER AND THROUGH THAT PORTION OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SAN LUISOBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A STRIP 19 FEET WIDE AND 225 FEET IN LENGTH RUNNING FROM THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OFJOHNSON AVENUE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL C OF PARCEL MAP SLO 80-121,IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1982 IN BOOK 32, PAGE 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THERECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.EASEMENT 345 From:Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:46 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:Re: 1364 San Marcos Ct Hi Juliana, We will see you 10am Thursday, at Station #1. Thank you! Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 On Mar 19, 2024, at 1:31 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, This Thursday at 10am works for me if you’d like to come by station one. I’ll put it on my calendar and see you then. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image002.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png><image007.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:21 PM 346 To: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Subject: Re: 1364 San Marcos Ct This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Julianna, Thanks for following up on this. We are working on an SB-9 Lot Split that will split the property into two parcels. A new home will subsequently be built on the rear parcel. Access to the rear parcel will be via an existing easement, across an adjacent property, out to Johnson Avenue. We would like to start a conversation with you about Fire Department requirements for the project. We are going to meet with Walter Oetzell in Planning on Thursday morning. Can we come to your office afterwards, say 10am? Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 <image001.png> On Mar 18, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> wrote: Hi Brian, I was notified that you’d like to schedule a meeting to discuss the parcel map and access to the property at 1364 San Marcos Ct. I tried giving you a call back but your mailbox was full for your phone so I couldn’t leave a message. Please let me know if any permits are open associated with this property and a day/time you’d like to meet. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II <image001.png> Fire Department Fire Prevention 347 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org <image002.png><image003.png><image004.png><image005.png><image006.png> Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 348 From:Duque, Alan Sent:Monday, March 18, 2024 1:57 PM To:Hutchinson, Julianna Subject:RE: Parcel map at 1364 San Marcos Ct. Thanks! From: Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 1:56 PM To: Duque, Alan <ADuque@slocity.org>; Beres, Jason <jberes@slocity.org>; Nau, Joey <jnau@slocity.org> Cc: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: RE: Parcel map at 1364 San Marcos Ct. I will call to assess. Thank you, Julianna M. Hutchinson Fire Inspector II Fire Department Fire Prevention 2160 Santa Barbara Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-5240 E JHutchin@slocity.org T 805.783.7805 C 805.431.2217 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Duque, Alan <ADuque@slocity.org> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 1:42 PM To: Beres, Jason <jberes@slocity.org>; Hutchinson, Julianna <JHutchin@slocity.org>; Nau, Joey <jnau@slocity.org> Cc: Tuggle, Todd <ttuggle@slocity.org> Subject: Parcel map at 1364 San Marcos Ct. Hi there, Brian Cowen from Cowen Consulting called to schedule a time to stop by the Station to discuss 1364 San Marcos Ct. regarding a parcel map/ access to the property. He said he usually has meetings with Rodger to go over this. Is this something that one of you can do? 805-705-2652 briancowen@mac.com Thanks! 349 Alan Duque Administrative Assistant Fire Department 2160 Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 E ADuque@slocity.org slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications 350 From:Leveille, Brian Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2024 3:52 PM To:Brian Cowen Subject:RE: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting Hi Brian, I’ve forwarded your inquiry over to our staff that handles general inquiries. In the future, for a quicker response, please email: planning@slocity.org Thank you, Brian Leveille Senior Planner Community Development Long Range Planning 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 E bleveille@slocity.org T 805.781.7166 slocity.org Stay connected with the City by signing up for e-notifications From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 12:56 PM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveill@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Brian, I am working with the owner/ resident of 1364 San Marcos Court on an application to subdivide the property. We would like to schedule a pre-application meeting with Planning, for the week of March 18th if possible. The property is over 1/3 of an acre and zoned R-1. We think it is a good candidate for an SB-9 Urban Lot Split. We would ask that representatives from Engineering and Fire be included in the meeting. 351 Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 352 353 From:Leveille, Brian Sent:Monday, March 11, 2024 1:41 PM To:Patino, Mallory Subject:FW: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting Hi Mallory, Not sure why I keep getting these lately. Can you help with this? You might want to check also if we’re still requiring Pre-applications for this kind of thing on SB9 lots. Seems like we would. Thanks -Brian From: Brian Cowen <briancowen@mac.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024 12:56 PM To: Leveille, Brian <bleveill@slocity.org> Subject: 1364 San Marcos Court // Pre-Application Meeting This message is from an External Source. Use caution when deciding to open attachments, click links, or respond. Hi Brian, I am working with the owner/ resident of 1364 San Marcos Court on an application to subdivide the property. We would like to schedule a pre-application meeting with Planning, for the week of March 18th if possible. The property is over 1/3 of an acre and zoned R-1. We think it is a good candidate for an SB-9 Urban Lot Split. We would ask that representatives from Engineering and Fire be included in the meeting. Thanks, Brian Brian Cowen Development + Land Use Consulting CA Registered Professional Engineer San Luis Obispo, California (805) 705-2652 354 1 Subject:1364 San Marcos wye cut in Location:1364 San Marcos Ct (1364 San Marcos Ct, San Luis Obispo, California 93401) Start:Mon 5/5/2025 1:00 PM End:Mon 5/5/2025 1:25 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Not yet responded Organizer:Montoya, Chase Required Attendees:Beech, Ryan; Rucker, Jarrett; Lester, Charles; Brimage, Mitchell Can I please schedule a wye cut in for action rooter at 1364 San Marcos ct on Monday 5/5 @ 1pm. ENCR-1010-2025 ________________________________________________________________________________ Microsoft Teams Need help? Join the meeting now Meeting Dial in by phone +1 209-645-4165,,38773757# United States, Stockton Find a local number Phone conference ID: For organizers: Meeting options | Reset dial-in PIN ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Subject:discuss final comments: FMAP-0167-2025 // 1364 San Marcos Ave Location:919 Conference Room 2, Interior Staff Start:Wed 7/9/2025 2:15 PM End:Wed 7/9/2025 3:30 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Not yet responded Organizer:Dadala, Hephzibah Required Attendees:Munoz-Morris, Gabriel; LaFreniere, Matt; Savage, Melissa Resources:919 Conference Room 2, Interior Staff Call Handling Mode 2:2 FMAP-0167-2025 Due: 07/09 -Make combined square footage of Parcel 1 and 2 on final and tentative parcel map match. Currently, total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the final parcel map is 15933 SF and total square footage Parcel 1 and 2 on the tentative parcel map is 15908 SF. -Correct the spelling of “OBISPO”, currently spelled “OBIPSO”, in the parcel map description at the bottom right corner of the sheets. -Does there need to be a signed agreement for the vehicle access easement from Johnson? 1 Subject:Map Signing Location:Tyler's Office Start:Wed 11/19/2025 3:30 PM End:Wed 11/19/2025 3:55 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Organizer:Savage, Melissa Required Attendees:Dadala, Hephzibah; Estrada, Ethan; Corey, Tyler Map signatures for: SLO 24-0045 1364 San Marcos SLO 25-0003 1203 Buchon 1 Subject:Map Signing Location:Tyler's Office Start:Wed 11/19/2025 2:00 PM End:Wed 11/19/2025 2:30 PM Show Time As:Tentative Recurrence:(none) Organizer:Savage, Melissa Required Attendees:Dadala, Hephzibah; Estrada, Ethan; Corey, Tyler Map signatures for: SLO 24-0045 1364 San Marcos SLO 25-0003 1203 Buchon