Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRE SLO Dr tree conditions per City Standards Sent:Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:47 AM To:Carloni, Marcus; Cohen, Rachel Cc:Hannula, Hal Subject:RE: SLO Dr. Thanks Marcus, Hey guys I have worked with this Arborist for years. After meeting him in the field and having past experiences with him, I feel confident that he will follow through with monitoring and protection measures stated in the protection plan. He will be on site during any excavation grading or root pruning . Hal, Marcus, and Rachel, Sorry, I have been preoccupied with other work and not responded as promptly as I would like. Barbara made it clear that the number one priority was working through and testing the new Cityworks program, due to “Go Live” in October. It’s been like studying for finals… or Intelliatime on steroids. Ask Andrew Collins, he loves spending countless hours learning and configuring this new program… See you around, Ron From: Carloni, Marcus Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 3:32 PM To: Combs, Ron; Cohen, Rachel Subject: RE: SLO Dr. For reference I have attached some of Ron’s tree comments on other San Luis Drive projects. Perhaps Ron would like to add some of these to this project as well if they apply. ---- Marcus Carloni Assistant Planner Community Development Department 919 Palm Street, City of San Luis Obisp o (805) 781-7176 mcarloni@slocity.org website From: Combs, Ron Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 2:29 PM 1 To: Cohen, Rachel Cc: Carloni, Marcus Subject: SLO Dr. Rachel. Here are my comments in case they did not come through. When I exited out of the program it did not respond in the usual way so I thought I would send it as an email as well. Thanks, Project Address 2171 SAN LUIS Parcel # 001-082-007 Application Number 107-13 1st Review Completeness Review Only After visiting the site and meeting with the applicants Arborist, I have determined that the Tree Protection and Preservation Plan submitted by the applicants are acceptable by the City Arborist. Also after meeting with one of the applicants, and Project Coordinator Josh Blair, I have a an understanding that excavation cuts will not be made for the small retaining wall located near the large 40”-50” diameter oak tree proposed to be retained. The small wall will be stacked at existing grade. Cuts shall be made at the furthest extent possible to accommodate the proposed building footprint. The Plans shall include this requirement so that any contractor’s subs or folks doing the excavation work are aware of the grading requirements. All tree protection fencing shall be in place before any work is started. Trees that were not part of the original tree protection and approval plan shall be subject to Tree Regulations and will be reviewed by the Tree Committee. Mitigation in the form of onsite tree plantings may be required. Donating to the city’s” Tree Bank “may be a reasonable alternative for this location if onsite plantings are not feasible. These donated trees are primarily used for creek restorations and Open Space enhancements. Occasionally they are utilized for Park and Street tree replacements. 2