HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditions for D000145D on Microfilm STIMSON- Wireless DRC2020-00114�r
.
w
• r
�
•�
4
f
�»�,•
I
11
i
R�ria:h
moo
r .I
J
J f, 404- t o
PLANNING .COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATF' OF CALIFOIA N I A
Thuoiday, March 8, 2001
PRESENT: Commissioners Cynthia pochc, Wayne Couper, Gene Tvlel►I ►►;huu, Bob Roos,
Chairman Doreen Liberto-l3lanck
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION NO. 2001.20
RESOLUTION :Rr-I.,ATIVI 'I'O TI11,�. GlZANTIN(:i
OF A DEVI:;I,OI'MI-?N'1' PLAN
WHEREAS, The County Planning Commission o,l'thc County ofSan 1,16S "WIC 01'
California, did, on the 8th day of March, 2001, grant a Development Plan to ALPINI? P('S )M
CONSULTING GROUP ) allow installation of a wireless communication facility consislit►g of
three twelve foot pipeniounts, four panel antennas, and an 8400t by 1446ot equipnmonl cabinrl, in
the Agricultural Land Use Category. The property is located in the county at 2101) is lack Strect,
approximately 300 yards from the corner of Slack Street and Henderson Street, in Kmal San Luis
Obispo, immediately north of the city of San Luis Obispo, APN: 073-341-008, in the San Luis
Obispo Planning Area. County File Number: D000145D.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, after considering the facts relating to such
application, approves this Permit subject to the Findings listed in Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, after considering the facts relating to such
application, approves this Permit subject to the Conditions listed in Exhibit B.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission of the County
of San Luis Obispo, State of California, in a regular meeting assembled on the 8th day of March,
2001, does hereby grant the aforesaid Permit No. D000145D.
If the use authorized by this Permit approval has not been established or if substantial work on the
property towards the establishment of the use is riot a progress after a period of twenty-four (24)
months from the date of this approval or such other time period as may be designated through
conditions of approval of this Permit, this approval shall expire and become void unless an extension
of time has been granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 22.02.050 of the Land Use Ordinance.
If the use authorized by this Permit approval. �inra otil,il�li4hr,I, Is of 1ws horn mmsr�l, t�hac,l�5i,c,l
discontinued, or has c� kwd for it period of sia monlhM (0) of hm a not bvun k wltphcd with,
such Permit approval shall become void.
On motion of Commissioner Cooper, secor dvd by McAlls.cllim, and o;tl the
following roil cull vote, to -wit:
AYES: Conttatissionors Cooper, Nlehl-whim, Items, 114who, Clum,man lAboulo-MmIck
NOF1,S: None.
ABSI?NT; None
the .foregoing resolution is hereby adopted.
/s/ Doreen Liherto-131anck
Chairman of the Planning Commission
ATTEST:
/s/ Diane Tingle
Secretary Planning Commission
'R:�j, j..;^.
•did' ,."� �.. '��
Planning Commission • • March 8, 2001
Alpine PCS/]M Consulting Group
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS
A. The proposed project or use is consistent with the San Luis Obispo Cc:ulnly General
Plan because the use is an allowed use and is consistent with illl of the General
Plan policies.
B. As conditioned, the proposed project or use satisfies all applicable hrovicalons of Tille
22 of the County Code.
C. The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the ueui will not, because
of the circumstances and conditions applied to this particular case, bo doIrlmentol to
the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons rosidInll or working In
the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to proportlos In the
vicinity:because the installation and operation of such a facility door riot generate
activity that presents' a potential threat to the surrounding proporty (md buildings.
This project is subject to Ordinance, Building Code and FCC requireniont5 designed
to address health, safety and welfare concerns:
D. As conditioned, the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the
character of the immediate -area or conteary•to-the orderly development because the
proposed use will not conflict with the surrounding lands and uses.
E. The proposed project or use will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe
capacity of all roads providing access to the project, either existing or to be
improved :with the project because the project is located on Slack Street, a 'local
road -:constructed'. to-a,level able to. handle any additional traffic associated with the
project. The only traffic associated with the project is a single vehicle performing
routine maintenance every four to six weeks.
F. In accordance with Section 22,07.164e, the proposed use or project will not create
significant adverse effects on the natural features of the site or vicinity that were the
basis for the Sensitive Resource Area and will preserve and protect such features
through site design.
G. In accordance with Section 22.07.164e, the design and siting of all physical
improvements of the proposed project or use considers natural features and
topography.
H. In accordance with Section 22.07.164e, any proposed clearing Ci topsoil, trees, or
other features, associated with the project or use, is the minimum necessary to
achieve safe and convenient access and siting of proposed structures, and will not
create significant adverse effects on the identified sensitive resource.
Planning Commission
Alpine PCS/7M Consulting Group
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ApP_rovod Use
1. This approval authorizes the installation al+d operation of a singio wlroless
communication facility, including the following improvomontfl,
a. three 12400t monopoles
b. four 5-foot panel antennas
c, a single 4-foot by 15-foot equipment enclosure
Site Development;
2. Site Development shall be consistent with the approved site plan and oiovtatlons
Visual and Aesthetic Impacts
Paint
3. Prior to final inspection, the improvements (equipment enclosure, monopoles,
antenna assemblies,)shall be painted a dark earth tone (i.e. olive green or drab)
to blend with surrounding vegetation and/or terrain. The color to be used shall
be matte finish. This color shall be maintained for thelife of the project.
Repainting shall occur as necessary.
Landscaping
4. Prior to issuance of a construction permit, the applicant shall submit landscape
and irrigation plans tothe:Department of Planning and Building for review and
approval. The type, size -and 'location of proposed vegetation -shall be. indicated
on the plans. The landscape plan shall use drought tolerant species; utilizing
California Natives to the .greatest extent possible. The landscape plan shall
provide vegetation that, -upon installation will substantially screen the equipment
shelter.
5. To guarantee the success of the landscaping, the applicant shall retain a
qualified individual :(e:g: arborist, landscape architect/contractor, nurseryman) to
monitor. the new vegetation until successfully established, on an annual basis, for
no.less thanthree years). The first report shall be submitted to the Department
of Planning and. Building one year after the initial planting and thereafter on an
annual. basis; until the monitor, in consultation with the County, has determined
that the. newly planted vegetation is successfully established. The applicant, and
successors -in -interest,- agrees to complete any necessary remedial measure
identified in the report.
Existing Trees
6. Trimming of existing trees shall be avoided unless a hazardous or unsafe condition
exists. If any existing trees require trimming or removal, the applicant shall submit
a letter prepared by a qualified individual to the County Department of Planning and
Building for review and approval. The letter shall -indicate the following:
,.n
IF , �~
Planning Commission 0 • March 8, 2001
Alpine PCS/JM Consulting Group
a. The need for trimming or removal -as a means for avoiding horardows or unsafe
conditions.
b. The nature and extent of trimming or removal.
c. The replacement of removed trees with trees in kind at a tour to ono ratio.
Firo Safely
7. Prior to final inspection, the equipment storage facility shall bo oulfittod with a Knox
box fire safety4ocking device.
Co-Ioc_Mm
8. The applicant agrees to allow other carriers to co -locate at this glto, It toohnit ily
feasible, subject to land use permit approval.
Me Restoration
9. All obsolete or used facilities shall be removed within twelve inonths of oo.stis �tion of
Staff Report
San Luis Obispo County Depnrtn►ont of Plannin(j and Building
DATE: MARCH Q, 200'l
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CRAIG WOER, PLANNING CONSULTANT (MORRO OItt UP. INC)
MATT JANSSEN, ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
SUBJECT: STIMSONIAPLINE PCS/JM CONSULTING
D000145D
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION
ATTACHMENTS. 1, Exhibit A — Flndings
2. Exhibit B — Conditions
3, Graphics
4, Referral Responsos
S. Negative Declaration
SUMMARY
Alpine PCS has proposed to construct a wireless communication facility consisting of
three 12-foot monopoles and a total of four 6-foot panel antennas. Two of the
monopoles are to carry a single panel antenna each, and the third is to carry two panel
antennas. The project also includes a proposed 4-foot by 15-foot equipment enclosure
which is to be contained within a 9-foot by 20-foot lease area.
Supelrisoeial District No. 5
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt`the resolution approving this development plan based on the findings listed in
Exhibit A and conditions listed in Exhibit B.
-PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Location: The proposed proje-t is located at 2100 Slack Street,
approximately 300 yards from the corner of Slack Street and
Henderson Street, in Rural San Luis Obispo.
(APN 073-341-008) San Luis Obispo Planning Area
QAw
General Plan: Agricultural
Combining Designation: Sensitive Resource Area/Geologic Study Area
Area Standards: Not Applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
County Government Center ♦ San Luis Obispo ♦ California 93408 ♦ (805) 781-5600 ♦ 1-800-834-4636
E-MAIL: ipcoping@slonet.org ♦ FAX: (805) 781-124 ♦ WEBSITE: http://www.slonet.org/vv/ipcoping
Planning Commission* March 8, 2001
Alpine PCS/3M Consulting Group Page 2
Existing Uses and Improvements:
Single Family Dwelling, Water S1.omi.lo 1`onk
Surrounding Zoning and Usos:
North: Agricultural, Grazing
South: City of San Luis Obispo-1 ot*lontlal, Singlo Family
Dwellings
East: Agricultural, Grazing
West: Cal Poly State University-0- razing Land
Parcel Size: 180 square foot lease area
Topography: level to gently rolling
Vegetation: grasses, shrubs, trees
Water: Not Applicable
Sewage Disposal: Not Applicable
Fire Protection: California Department of Forestry
Acceptance Date: January 16, 2001
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Categorical Exemption was issued on January 25, 2001 (ED 00-366)
DISCUSSION
The: proposed wireless communication facility will be located at 2100 Slack Street in
Rural San Luis Obispo, just outside of the City's Urban Reserve Line. A single-family
dwelling, and a water storage tank currently exist on the site. The proposed project
includesthree 12-foot monopoles, and a total of four 6-foot panel antennas. Two of the
proposed monopoles will carry a single panel antenna, and the third monopole will carry
two panel antennas. The project also consists of a 4-foot by 15-foot equipment
enclosure which is to be located behind existing vegetation in a 180 square foot lease
area.
The proposed project site has been proposed for the least visually obtrusive area on the
site. As conditioned the project meets all applicable requirements.
7�� 5
y,
Planning Commission March 81 2001
Alpine PC5/3M Consulting Group Page 3
ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE
Land Use Ordinance
22.08:280-Communication Facilities
The communication facilities section of the County Land Use Ordinanco roquire [; that
applications for communication facilities provide estimates of non -ionizing ra lntion
generated and/or received by the facility. The report preparod for this plolocl concluded
that highest possible level of RF that could be produced by this sito would bo much loss
than the prevailing standards set forth by the FCC, presenting no real impncl to the
environment or general public.
The communication facilities section of the County Land Use Ordinanco also roquires
that the applicant look to other siting methods prior to the installation of a now Dole. The
applicant has justified that there are no existing poles, or other high structures upon
which the proposed facility may be successfully located: The applicant has minimized
the height of the proposed poles, and has used' materials that are appropriate for the
surroundings.
Furthermore the -communication facilities section of the County Land Use Ordinance
allows<that a proposed project be located within of the established setbacks, without the
approval of a variance, if such a site location is necessary to ensure that the proposed
project is the mostdesirable alternative, and creates the least possible visual impacts.
The proposed site location is the least visually obtrusive for this project. The proposed
site allows the facility equipment -'enclosure to be located behind existing vegetation, and
allows that same vegetation to serve as a backdrop for the proposed antenna
assemblies.
Staff Report Preoared by Craig Weber
and Reviewed by Kaml Griffin
17.
Planning Commission ' Momh rt, 2001
Alpine PCS/]M Consulting Group Page 4
EXHIBIT A
FINDINGS
A. The proposed project or use Is consistent with the San t_uitl Obinp(,) Counly General
Plan because the use is an allowed use and is consistotrl with nil of tho 00ntral
Plan policies,
B. As conditioned, the proposed project or use satisfies all applicable provislontA cif title
22 of the County Code.
C. The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of tho u€ o will not, bwcause
of the --circumstances and conditions applied to this particular caso, be dotrimental to
the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons rosiding or working in
the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to proporllot; in the
vicinity -:because the installation and operation of such a facility does not generate
activity that presents a potenti FI threat to the surrounding property and buildings
This project i& subject to Ordinance, Building Code and FCC requirements designed
to address health, safety and welfare,,concerns.
D. As conditioned, the proposed project or use will not be inconsistent with the
character of the immediate area- or contrary to the orderly development because the
proposed use will notconflict with the surrounding lands and uses.
E. The proposed project or use will not generate a volume of traffic beyond the safe
capacity of all roads ,providing access to the project, either existing or to be improved
with the project because the project is located on Slack Street, a local road
constructed to a level able to handle any additional traffic associated with the
project, The only traffic iassociated with the project is a single vehicle performing
routine maintenance every four to six weeks.
F. In accordance with Section 22.07.164e, the proposed use or project will not create
Significant adverse effects on the natural features of the site or vicinity that were the
basis- for the 'Sensitive Resource Area and will preserve and protect such features
through zite design.
G, In accordance with Section 22.07.164e, the design and siting of all physical
improvements of the proposed project or use considers natural features and
topography.
H. In accordance with Section 22.07.164e, any proposed clearing of topsoil, trees, or
other features, associated with the project or use, is the minimum necessary to
achieve safe and convenient access and siting of proposed structures, and will not
create significant adverse effects on the identified sensitive resource.
Planning Commission• March S. 2001
Alpine PCS/]M Consulting Group page 5
EXHIBIT B
CONDITION&OF APPROVAL
Approved Use
1. This approval authorizes the installation and opornflon of o singlo wirolOss
communication facility, including the following improvomotils,
a. three 12400t monopoles
b. four 5-foot panel antennas
C. a single 4-foot by 15-foot equipment enclosure
310peyelopment
2. Site Development shall be consistent with the approved site plan and olrwntloos
Visual_a.nd Aesthetic Impacts
Paint
3. Prior to final inspection, the improvements (equipment enclosure, monopoles,
antenna assemblies;) shall be painted,a dark -earth tone (i.e. olive green or drab)
to blend<with surrounding vegetation -and/or terrain. The color to be used shall .be
matte'fnish. This color shall.be maintained for, the life of the project, Repainting
shall -occur as necessary.
Landscaping
4. Prior -to issuance of a construction permit, the applicant shali submit landscape
and irrigation,.plans,.toahe Department of Planning, and Building for review and
approval. The type, size and location of proposed vegetation shall berindicated
on the plans. The-land'scape,plan-shall use drought'tolerant-species, utilizing.
California Natives -to -the greatest extent -possible: The landscape: plan shall
provide vegetation that, upon installation will substantially screen the equipment
shelter.
5. To .guarantee the success of the landscaping, the applicant shall retain a
qualified individual (e.g. arborist, landscape architect/contractor, nurseryman) to
monitor he new vegetation until successfully established, on an annual basis, for
no less than three years). The first report shall be submitted to the Department
of�Planning-and`guilding-one year afterthe initial planting--and-thereafter on an
annual basis, until the: monitor, in consultation with the County, has determined
that the newly planted vegetation is successfully established. The applicant, and
successors -in -interest, agrees to complete any necessary remedial measure
identified in the report.
Existing Trees
6. Trimming of existing trees shall be avoided unless a hazardous or unsafe condition
exists. If any existing trees require trimming or removal, the applicant shall submit
a letter prepared by a qualified individual to the County Department of Planning and
Building for review and approval. The letter shall indicate the following:
Planning Commissions • Maich 8, 2001
Alpine PCS/JM Consulting Group Page 6
a
b.
C.
The need for trimming or removal as a means for avoiding hmeardmiq or unsafe
conditions.
The nature and extent of trimming or removal:
The replacement of removed'trees with trees in kind at a four to onto ratio.
Fire _Safety
7. Prior to final inspection, the equipment storage. facility shall bra outfittod with a Knox
box fire safety -locking device.
Co--
location
8; The applicant agrees to allow other carriers to co -locate at this site, it tochnicAlly
feasible, subject to land use permit approval.
Site Restoration
9. All obsolete or used facilities shall be removed within twelve months of cessation of
telecommunication operations on the site.. Disturbance. related to the Installation -of
the facilities shall be restored to pre -project condition. Restoration does not include
the removal of vegetation planted to provide'visual screening.
U
.� SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING ���•
w j'� � /fir I 1 �• `;/ r � ti` I _ _ � , f , a
ui
•.... � •. _ .�.._ i-�-•-'v. -� .,,, �••- / / ram'
�, '- - -- -----•-------� �-.� _.__- 'ram � �/�•- s' �-� - ice' .ti4 /
-_.. �..' '•-_---- ._�__ _1 � -- - �` •.. - ,- .l �,. .,ter.
PROJECT -�
Planning Commission
Stimson-D000145D
EXHIBIT
Site Plan Detail
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING
PROJECT din EXHIBIT
Planning Commission
Stimson-D000`145D South Elevation
a�
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND 14011.01N(i�--
�Illr
Fla
ro =,q7