Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/02/1996, 2 - CONSIDERATION OF THE 1996 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG) AND REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 1996 URBAN COUNTY CONSOLIDATED PLAN.
1111ag pIpI11 1 city of San LaIS OB1SpO AEETING� AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA REPS ITEa1#_ a FROM: Arnold Jonas, Community Development Director; By: Jeff HqisZciate Planner SUBJECT: Consideration of the 1996 Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and review of the Draft 1996 Urban County Consolidated Plan. CAO RECOMMENDATION: Take public testimony and by motion: A) approve the recommended CDBG funding for Program Year 1996, Table 1; B) concur with the recommended Special Urban Projects funding, Table 2; C) concur with the recommended .countywide HOME funding, Table 3; D) reallocate $101,750 in 1994 CDBG funds to the Pismo/Beach Streets Family Housing Development; E) authorize CAO to use approximately $70,000 in closed out State CDBG grant program income for At-risk Youth Services and Airport Area planning; and F) endorse the "One-Year Action Plan" and forward the recommendations to the County Board of Supervisors. REPORT-IN-BRIEF The City received 22 requests totaling over $5.67 million, far exceeding the anticipated CDBG funding of $953,720 for Program Year 1996 ("Program Year" refers to the Urban County's funding cycle which runs from July 1 thru June 30 of the following calendar year). The report evaluates the funding requests and, based on previous Council actions and City goals and policies, recommends activities to receive CDBG and HOME funds and their funding levels. It introduces Section 108 federal guaranteed loans as a tool to fund major community projects and recommends its use for affordable housing programs and to assist the Airport Area Annexation. It also recommends that$101,750 in unused 1994 CDBG funds be reallocated to the Housing Authority for the Pismo/Beach Streets Family Housing Development. Approximately $70,000 in program income from previous state CDBG grants is also proposed to be used as a one-time "backfill" for the At-risk Youth Services program and the Airport Area Planning program. DISCUSSION Background. In December, the County of San Luis Obispo issued a Request For Proposals, soliciting requests for use of federal grant funds. Funding applications were due at the end of January. Participating cities must now review the CDBG applications for projects in their jurisdictions and forward their funding recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The Board is expected to endorse Council-adopted programs, provided the programs meet HUD rules. Based on preliminary information from HUD, the Urban County expects to receive CDBG funds totaling $2.825 million, although the final amount available will not be known until Congress approves the budget later this year. The City of San Luis Obispo is expected to receive the same amount as last year — $953,720. In addition to CDBG funding, the Urban County also receives a formula grant for the Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME). Council members should recommend countywide projects to receive the $969,000 in HOME funds. 1 ��+ ►iml�l�gpp�u��i � MY Of SAn IU,S OBI SPO = COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 2 Consolidated Plan/HUD approval. Under our Urban County cooperation agreement, the Council should act on the"One-Year Action Plan", a part of the HUD-required Consolidated Plan. Most of the CP is background information on needs and demographics, and is unchanged from previous years. The attached "One-Year Action Plan" describes the planned CDBG and HOME activities for 1996, and this is the part of the plan that requires council review and recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Along with the cities' 1996 CDBG funding recommendations, the CP will be scheduled for Board of Supervisors consideration on April 9th and April 23rd. Council reviews the CP but has approval authority only over those CDBG activities located within the City. Council may make recommendations on projects to receive Special Urban Projects and HOME funds, although this is not required. The final CP will include each jurisdiction's adopted CDBG program, and the Board's approved Special Urban Projects and HOME projects before it is submitted to HUD in May. HUD then reviews the plan and notifies the Urban County in June once it is approved. Funding becomes available in late July or early August once HUD-required agreements are completed. Council Goals and Priorities. When the City began the block grant program in 1994, Coun& identified affordable housing as the number one funding priority. Emergency shelters an, homeless services were designated as second priority, with removal of architectural barriers for disabled persons as the third priority. Economic development/seismic retrofit and child cx.-'at- risk youth services were identified as priorities 4 and 5. These activities are still imp,;n+ant community needs in 1996. Council has also identified several specific activities as meriting block grant funding, either as new or continuing City projects: ■ Develop a Homeless Services Center on City-owned property on Prado Road; ■ Continue joint City/County funding of the Homeless Shelter on Orcutt Road; ■ Assist private sector efforts to seismically strengthen unreinforced masonry buildings; ■ Take steps leading to annexation of the Airport Area to the City of San Luis Obispo; ■ Continue to provide recreation, childcare and other services for at-risk youth; ■ Provide handicapped access and related improvements at the County Historical Museum. HUD Objectives and rules. The Urban County's CDBG activities must, by law, meet HUD objectives and rules. HUD has three broad national objectives for CDBG-funded projects: 1. To benefit low- and moderate-income persons; 2. To aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; and 3. To meet community development needs having a particularly urgency. Projects must also meet federal eligibility criteria and rules. For example, HUD requires that at least 70 percent of the Urban County's grants go to activities that benefit low- and moderate- income persons. At least 51 percent of individual project or program funds must benefit low- and CIty Or San WI s OBI SPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 3 moderate-income persons, and up to 20 percent of the City's total funding can be used for overall CDBG program administration and other indirect costs (Council has previously set a 10 percent limit for San Luis Obispo). Up to 15 percent of the Urban County's CDBG funds can go toward Public Services. The recommended 1996 program meets these objectives and rules. Community Needs Hearings. The County held "needs" hearings early this year to allow the public to identify community problems and needs, including one held at the San Luis Obispo Veteran's Building. About 32 persons, including citizens and representatives of housing agencies, housing support groups, and social service organizations identified the following as important community needs: 1. Affordable housing for single parent families, disabled persons, AIDS patients, elderly and low-income first time homebuyers; 2. Rental housing for very-low and low income households, especially families; 3. Special needs housing for victims of domestic violence, persons with AIDS, disabled persons, persons recovering from substance abuse, and low-income elderly persons. 4. Job training facilities and counseling services for disabled persons;. 5. Handicapped access and related improvements for the County Historical Museum; 6. Housing repair services for low-income elderly persons. 7. Continued assistance for high-risk youth, including child care for teen parents. 8. Support for the Children's Museum to serve low income groups. Project Evaluations and Recommendations. The CDBG funding proposals were reviewed by a CIP committee consisting of staff from Administration, Public Works, Utilities, Finance, Police, Parks and Recreation and Community Development Departments. Committee members evaluated the proposals based on HUD eligibility rules, feasibility, consistency with General Plan and City Council goals, and community needs. Based on the Committee's recommendations and Council's previous actions regarding CDBG funding priorities, staff prepared Table I listing the recommended CDBG activities and funding levels. Because HUD wants grantees to undertake projects as soon after grant approval as possible, staff recommends giving preference to activities which can be undertaken relatively quickly, and to last year's CDBG programs with a continuing, urgent need, such as operation of the San Luis Obispo Homeless Shelter, At-risk Youth Services, and the Seismic Retrofit Loan program; and to those new programs which appear most consistent with Council goals and priorities. The Housing Authority has also requested that the City reallocate $101,750 in unspent 1994 CDBG funds from the High Street Family Apartments to augment requested 1996 funding for another Housing Authority project, Low Income Family Housing on Pismo Street. a?-3 ��� �►�1111111=� ��I MY Of son LW 2; OBI SPO MiS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 4 TABLE 1: Recommended Activities For The 1996 Program Year (Italics indicate on-going programs) Activity. M :A .......... . ft djW M Public Services SLO Homeless Shelter Economic Oppornatity operate SLO Homekss 120,000 Commission Shelter on Orcutt Rd. At-Risk Yozah services City of SLO Recreation,day care, 63,000' Program parenting training, head start program Homeless Services City of SLO food, counseling, and 40,000 Center on Prado Road related day services for homeless persons Public Historical Museum City of SLO make public museum 117,000 Facilities handicapped access handicapped accessible improvements Homeless Services City of SLO Build day center for 50,000 Center on Prado Road homeless persons Economic Seismic Retroft City of SLO Commercial 100,000 Development Grant Program rehab/historic restoration Housing SLO Housing City of SLO Animal repayment for 272,976 Assistance Program: federal housing loan Section 108 Loan RE. - ment Planning study Airport Area Specific City of SLO Prepare specific plan 95,3722 Plan and ER for RASP Program MWAdminisoadon Planning/administrative City of SLO 95,372 Administration services (70%) _L=AL _T 953.720 'An additional $37,000 to be provided from program income of approximately $70,000 in closed out State CDBG grants to meet the total funding request of$100,000, on a one-time basis. 'An additional $33,000 to be provided from program income of approximately $70,000 in closed out State CDBG grants for a total funding of$128,372, on a one-time basis. ����► �NIIINIIP�N�q�lp City Of San LaI S OBI Spo NiiSCOUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 5 Sedion 108 Guaranteed Federal Ivan. Staff recommends that the City apply for approximately $1.5 million in federal guaranteed loans. The recommended CDBG program includes about $273,000 in CDBG funds to pay first year start-up, principal and interest costs for a Section 108 federal loan. About $1 Million of these loan funds would be distributed to the City's housing Authority to help pay for affordable housing projects. The balance would be available to use, at the Council's discretion, for assisting eligible projects such as efforts to annex the Airport and Margarita Areas. Eligible costs include: property acquisition, property rehabilitation, relocation, site preparation, and economic development activities. Preparation of specific plans, E1Rs or other planning documents, is not an eligible activity. Specific uses for the loan need not be designated now; staff anticipates returning to Council, prior to submitting loan documents to HUD, for direction on the specific uses of Section 108 loan funding. Section 108 loans provide funding for major community development projects and are available for up to five times the community's annual CDBG formula grant. HUD issues and guarantees notes held by the participating city. In return for HUD guarantees, the city pledges future CDBG funds toward repayment of the loan. Cities must pay most costs of issuing notes, and must payback loan principal and interest within 20 years. Loans may be used for acquisition of real property and other housing and economic activities. By borrowing against future CDBG allocations, a city has a pool of funds available to undertake many CDBG-eligible projects which might not otherwise be feasible. Without Section 108, some cities and counties have used a strategy of setting aside a limited amount of funds each year until they were able to finance a large project. This"pay-as-you-go" strategy is often impractical for large projects. Many projects require a quick response, or cannot wait for resources to accumulate over a period years. Also, cities typically obligate annual CDBG funds for more immediate needs, leaving few resources for larger, long-term projects. Repayment of the loan would constitute the City's CDBG housing allocation for the foreseeable future. It is estimated that this loan would obligate the City for an annual principal and interest payment of approximately$250,000 to$300,000 for up to 10 years; although loan terms and total costs depend on interest rates on the date notes are offered and upon on variables which are difficult to determine at this time. Loan terms of up to 20 years are possible. Projects undertaken with loan funds would have to comply with the same federal regulations as CDBG projects, eg. Davis-Bacon wage rates and environmental regulations. It is important to note that future CDBG revenue, not the General Fund, is pledged toward repayment of the Section 108 loan. For repayment terms of six years or less, HUD views the block grant as sole collateral for the loan. For terms of 7 to 9 yeas, HUD may require security beyond the pledge of CDBG funds. For a term of 10 to 20 years, HUD will require additional collateral against borrowed funds to ensure repayment of the loan even if the CDBG program were discontinued. 111111f110IfM11111 city of San It i S OBISPO Via; COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 6 Special Urban Projects Funding. Under the Cooperation Agreement, 15 percent of the net County funding is set aside annually for a "Special Urban Projects Fund." Funds are avai.able to all participating jurisdictions on a competitive basis and are awarded by the Board of Supervisors. Special urban projects are those that are more regional in scope, meet an urgent community need, and would not be feasible without special funding assistance. $163,025 is available in 1996 program year. The draft CP includes Special Urban Projects funds in the amounts of$25,000 toward construction of the Homeless Services Center, $40,000 for Homeless Services Center operation, and $91,125 for the Homeless Shelter. TABLE 2: Recommended Special Urban Projects For The 1996 CDBG Program roect Name Actrv�o ty Applicant Funding A. � ) Homeless Services Center Public Services City of SLO 40,000 (operations) Homeless Services Center Public Facilities City of SLO 25,000 construction) SLO Homeless Shelter Public Services EDC 91,125 (operatio-D) North County Women's Shelter Public Facilities North County 6,900 Driveway Installation Women's Shelter TOTAL 163,025 HOME Funding. The HOME program is necifically designed to help communities provide affordable housing. A 25 percent local maty, is required. The local match is met by the City, its Housing Authority, or the community non-profit requesting the funding. Unlike CDBG funds, HOME funds can be used to construct new housing. It can also be used for a variety of housing assistance such as first-time homebuyer loans or payment of impact fees. The Urban County expects to receive HOME funds totaling $969,000 in 1996. 1 addition, $400,000 in HOME funds is being carried forward from 1994 and 1995 program years to fund the First Time Homebuyers Assistance Program, expected to start this Summer. The program will help low-and moderate-income County residents purchase their own homes and is consistent with Housing Element policies promoting homebuyer assistance. The Housing Authority proposes to use a prior land donation to meet local match requirements for the First Time Homebuyers Program; no City matching funds would be required. Programs to be funded — and their funding levels —will be determined by the Board of Supervisors, considering the recommendations of the participating cities. a?- city of San LUIS OBISPO .Mid; COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 7 Staff recommends that the Council endorse the HOME activities listed in Table 3, and the $400, 000 to be carried forward for the First Time Homebuyers Program. TABLE 3: Recommended HOME Projects/Programs For The 1996 Program Year ..... . ..... ....... ........... ...... ............. ... ............ ............ T. Mon ............ . Vty Blackstone Hotel Rehabilitation Housing acquisition and SLO Housing 250,000 for Senior Housing -construction Authority Nipomo Affordable Homes Housing construction Peoples' Self-Help 200,000 Housing Corp. Rental Housing Development Housing Construction Peoples' Self-Help 200,000 Housing Corp. Templeton Rental Housing Housing Construction Peoples' Self-Help 200,000 Development Housing Corp. County Administration, 1996-97 Administrative Costs County of SLO 46,000 HOME Program CHDO funding:operating and neighborhood housing Peoples' Self-Help 73,000 capacity building organization support Housing Corp. And Affordable Homes, Inc. TOTAL $969,000 Projects Not Recommended for CDBG Funding. Exhibit B describes the projects not recommended for funding. Many of these projects clearly meet a community need; however based on City priorities and available funding, many of the projects are not recommended for funding. One or more of the Housing Authority's proposed affordable housing projects may be funded with the proceeds of the Section 108 guaranteed loan instead of CDBG funds. Of these, the Blackstone Hotel Rehabilitation appears most consistent with General Plan goals, particularly with regard to housing and Downtown economic vitality. The Council may choose to recommend which housing project or projects should receive funding through Section 108 funds. The following projects are not recommended for funding at this time: p gject Applican Rquest M Housing Assistance Program City of SLO $250,000 Health & Safety services Home Health Agency 4,760 Build storage shed SLO Women's Shelter 23,852 Install utilities LifeSpan Services Network 24,600 ���� i ��nlil���ln�u►I N MY Of San LU6 OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 8 Build Commty. Ctr. LifeSpan Services Network. 150,000 Emergency food/shelter Salvation Army of SLO 20,000 Job training for disabled Achievement House, Inc. 1159000 Blackstone Hotel Rehab. SLO Housing Authority 720,000 Low income family Hsg. SLO Housing Authority 400,000 Homeless Shelter upkeep SLO Housing Authority 102000 Low income hsg.for disabled SLO Housing Authority 860,000 Children's work incentive prgm. SLO Housing Authority 122000 Runaway/homeless youth hsg. LifeSteps Foundation 294,650 Women/Children transition hsg. LifeSteps Foundation 399,500 Senior Home Repair Program EOC ^220,000 FISCAL IMPACT CDBG programs and funding priorities will have an overall beneficial fiscal effect. To the extent that qualified, on-going City programs are funded through the CDBG program, more funding is available for other important City programs. Based on the City's Cost Allocation procedures, estimated program administration costs exceed the 10 percent spending cap established by Council. By setting a cap on program administration below actual costs, the City is able to fund "planning and capacity building activities" in the Airport Area, and General Fund monies are then used to support some of the administrative costs. The Section 108 federal guaranteed loan will obligate the City to pay back principal and interest on a$1,485,000 loan over a period of up to 20 years. Assuming a 10-year repayment term with variable interest rate, total loan cost is estimated at approximately$2,000,000; however actual cost will depend on interest rate at the time of bond offering, underwriting costs, and repayment term. While the loan is insured by the federal government, it is not without risk. Future CDBG funds are pledged as collateral for loan repayment; and by keeping the loan term to six years or less, the City's risk of having to use General funds to repay the loan are minimized. Recommended Funding Allocations by HUD eligibility category: Public Services 223,000 (23%) Public Facilities 167,000 (18%) Economic Development 100,000 (10%) Housing 2729976 (29%) Planning/Capacity Building 95,372 (10%) Program Administration 95,372 (10%) TOTAL CDBG FUNDS ALLOCATED $9539720 (100%) ai�1�NB►�IIIII(I�P���I �� city of san Lai s oBi spo COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 9 Public Services Spending HUD limits the Urban County's total spending on public services to 15 percent. For the third year, the City of San Luis Obispo is exceeding the 15 percent cap; however other jurisdictions in the Urban County are not using their full public service allotment. Consequently, it is possible for the City to use up to 23 percent of its 1996 funds for public services, or $223,000. To fully fund the Homeless Shelter, Homeless Service Center (operations), and At-Risk Youth Services with CDBG funds, however, would require$260,000 in the 1996 program year. Obviously, there is a funding shortfall this year which is not likely to go away in future years. It is quite possible that the City's CDBG public service funding will have to be cut in future grant years as other jurisdictions increase their use of CDBG for public services. Consequently, there is a "structural" issue which needs to be resolved sooner or later: how to fully fund the above public services at the desired level, given the City's level of CDBG funding and HUD rules. This year's shortfall of$37,000 can be offset through the use of program income from past State CDBG grants, however this is, at best, a one-time fix. This "recycled" program income consists of repaid principal plus interest on two closed-out affordable housing rehabilitation loans (Park Hotel and San Luis Hotel) funded in the 1980s through the State's Small Cities CDBG program. Now that the grants are closed out, the money is the City's to use for eligible grant activities and is not subject to the percent limits for public services and planning/administration. After this program year, there is not enough State program income to continue to fund the public services shortfall. Staff sees two possible approaches to preventing the shortfall in the future: 1) the "pay-as-you-go approach", by reducing the public services allocations by $37,000 by cutting CDBG funding to the Homeless Services Center operations or the At-risk Youth Program, or both, by some method to be determined. By previous agreement, the City's share of Homeless Shelter funding is set at $120,000 annually through 1997, so the Shelter's annual City CDBG funding must remain at $120,000 until the 1998 program year; or 2) the "backfill" approach, by funding the shortfall from the General Fund. The City's actual costs to administer the CDBG program exceed the 10 percent cap that Council set in 1994. By increasing the cap to 15 percent of the annual CDBG grant for "program administration" (HUD allows up to 20 percent for this purpose), the General Fund would be reimbursed an additional $47,000 annually—more than enough to cover the shortfall in public service funding. If Council opts for this approach, the proposed $95,372 for Airport/Margarita Area planning — with an equal or greater dollar amount anticipated to be needed next year as well—would have to be cut by one- half to remain within the 20% cap on total funding allowed for Planning and Program Administration. �m�►�►��h����P �lll MY Of San Wee OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 10 Councilmembers may choose to address the"structural" issue in this program year review and give direction on which approach it prefers; or postpone the issue until later this year to allow additional study, but well in advance of next year's funding cycle. ALTERNATIVE 1. Revise candidate CDBG and HOME projects and funding levels. Councilmembers may indicate their intention to change the list of City projects to receive CDBG funding, and/or to change the funding levels from those recommended. Attachments: -Exhibit A: Recommended CDBG Projects -Exhibit B: CDBG Projects Not Recommended -Draft Consolidated Plan: "First Year Action Plan" NOTE: The 1996 CDBG Project Applications for City of San Luis Obispo: Available in Council Office. 111@%jjIII@11j jjj$ city of san LaIs OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 11 EXHIBIT A City of San Luis Obispo CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS RECONEWE iDED FOR FUNDING, Program Year 1996 San Luis Obispo Homeless Shelter The City of San Luis Obispo requests $120,000 to fund the continuing operation of the Economic Opportunity Commission's (EOC) Homeless Shelter Program. The Shelter provides meals, overnight shelter, and counseling assistance to homeless persons in San Luis Obispo. The funds will be used to defray general salary and operational expenses for the Shelter, which serves approximately 49 homeless individuals per evening (maximum capacity). The County of San Luis Obispo is allocating an additional $120,000 to defray shelter operational and program costs. Homeless Services Center The City of San Luis Obispo requests $90,000 ($40K for public services; $50,000 for construction) to provide facilities for the provision of various services to homeless persons and those vulnerable to becoming homeless. The facility will provide hot meals, showers, laundry facilities, counseling, day care and other services. Seismic Retrofit Grant Program The City of San Luis Obispo requests $100,000 to be added to $199,000 which was allocated in 1994 and 1995 CDBG funds for this purpose. The funds would be used for grants to owners of commercial property to assist in seismic strengthening to meet State earthquake safety standards, and to encourage the preservation of historic unreinforced masonry buildings. At-Risk Youth Services Program The City of San Luis Obispo proposes using $63,000 in CDBG funds, $37,000 in program income from a previous State block grant, to continue several successful programs started in 1994 which provide recreational and educational services to at-risk youth and their parents. Funds will be used to support existing programs as well as for "seed money" for new programs. Services provided include: scholarships for childcare, aquatics, sports, pre-teen and teen intervention, and summer day camp; after school programs for at-risk students in fourth through sixth grades; expansion of HUD-EOC-Head Start programs for low-income children; and child care and recreation programs for teen parents and homeless youth. ��� ►��niIIII�Ii j��Ill MY Of San IW S OBI SPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 12 Historical Museum Handicapped Access Improvements The City-owned Historical Museum currently does not meet State or Federal rules for handicapped accessibility. The Human Relations Commission designated this building has high priority for handicapped accessibility due to its location in Mission Plaza and function as an important community attraction for both visitors and residents. In November of last year, Council reallocated $150,000 from the Marsh Street Handicapped Ramps project to this project. Staff proposes allocating an additional $117,000 for a total budget of$267,000 to provide handicapped accessibility and to waterproof the lower floor to allow accessibility during rainy weather. Planning and Capacity Building The City plans to use $95,372 to assist the preparation of tha Airport Area (includes Margarita Area) Specific Plan and EE?,. Much of the Margarita sub-area planning is completed, and the additional funding will allow progress toward annexing key residential and commercial areas to the City of San Luis Obispo, consistent with General Plan policies. Under HUD rules, CDBG funding for Planning and Capacity Building and Program Administration is limited to 20 percent of the jurisdiction's total annual grant. Program Administration The City of San Luis Obispo proposes to use $95,372 (10 percent of its total 1995 CDBG funding) to administer the City's CDBG programs. Under U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rules, participating jurisdictions can use up to 20 percent of total CDBG funds to defray their general administrative and overhead costs. Section 108 Guaranteed Federal Loan The City of San Luis Obispo intends to use a Section 108 Guaranteed Loan of approximately $1.5 Million to fund one or more planning and housing activic _s. About $1 Million of the Loan would be distributed to the City's Housing Authority to help pay for affordable housing projects. The balance would be available to use, at Council's discretion, to assist eligible projects such as efforts to annex the Airport and Margarita areas. Funding these activities using the City's annual CDBG allocation is not possible because their total cost exceeds the City's 1996 CDBG allocation. Section 108 loan funds will allow the City to provide the necessary "up front" capital to fund these activities and to repay the loan using future CDBG allocations, housing trust funds, and property owner contributions. 11111 111111 jell city Of San LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 13 EXHIBIT B City of San Luis Obispo CDBG FUNDING REQUESTS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING, Program Year 1996 Housing Assistance Program. The City of San Luis Obispo proposes using $250,000 to help -acquire, develop, and rehabilitate real property to provide affordable housing for very-low, low and moderate income persons. The program is not recommended because it would duplicate the planned use of proceeds from proposed Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Program. If the City does not proceed with the loan, the "HAP" program would provide a source of funds to leverage additional public and private funding in affordable housing. Health and Safety Services. The Home Health Agency of San Luis Obispo County requests $4,760 to pay for home health and safety audits for senior citizens and disabled persons. The grant would pay for trained professionals to inspect homes for safety and health measures which would improve quality of life for seniors and disabled persons; and to provide certain health and safety equipment which is not covered under Medicare and Medical programs. Program benefits would be for San Luis Obispo City residents. The project is not recommended for funding because, while this is an important community project and eligible for CDBG funding, other public services requests were considered to be more consistent Council funding priorities Storage Building for Women's Shelter. The Women's Shelter requests about $24,000 to replace a deteriorating metal shed with a new 36' X 14' food storage building. The new building would allow proper storage of food and other items necessary to support the 10-bed emergency shelter. It would allow the shelter to accept larger food donations by overcoming problems with lack of space and spoilage in the current facility. build a new purchase their existing facility at 1306 Higuera Street in San Luis Obispo. The Women's Shelter received $63,000 in FY 1995 CDBG funds for installation of a sewer lateral. The storage building request is not recommended for funding because while this is an eligible activity and a needed improvement, it does not appear to be as high a priority as other recommended CDBG activities. Build Community Center and Install Utilities. LifeSpan Services Network requests $174,600 to build a community center at the UCC Congregational Church on Los Osos Valley Road and to install utilities to serve the new center. The 4,300 square foot facility would be built on land which the City recently sold to the church, and would serve secular-only needs primarily of seniors and at-risk youth. LifeSpan Services would own and operate the building under a 25-year lease agreement with the church, and the church would become the owner after the lease expires. CDBG funding would provide one-half of the project's total cost, with the balance met through mortgage financing and donations of labor and materials. Funding is not recommended because while this appears to be an eligible activity, the City already supports programs for seniors and at-risk youth, and may, to a degree, duplicate available _ 3 ����i�N►�hllll�lhni��l city of San tuts OBISp0 COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 14 services. The project does not appear to be as high a priority as other recommended projects, given the City's limited CDBG funding. Emergency Food and Shelter. The Salvation Army of San Luis Obispo requests $20,000 to provide emergency food bags, eviction prevention, and utility assistance to City residents. The assistance helps homeless persons and those affected by natural disasters or other civil emergencies. This pu. services is an eligible CDBG activity and meets a demonstrated community need. It ; recommended because the City already exceeds its 15 percent public services limit ai;"' there other public services, also serving homeless persons, which appear to be higher priorities. Job Training for Disabled Persons. Achievement House requests $115,000 to purchase a building in San Luis Obispo to relocate its job training/work programs for disabled persons. The program, currently based at Cuesta College, helps train developmentally disabled persons to provide skilled and unskilled business services in the community. A more efficient, centrally located facility is needed to improve job training services. Their current facility is substandard, inconvenient for business customers, and does not meet the program's current or projected needs. CDBG funds would provide 23 percent of the cost to purchase and rehabilitate the building, with the balance of funding coming from Achievement HOL:a Inc., fund raisers and donations, and San Luis Coastal Unified School District. This program meets CDBG eligibility rules and clearly meets a demonstrated community need. It is not recommended for funding at this tirne because omer projects are considered higher priorities due to previous funding commitments or Council goals. Housing Authority Projects. The San Luis Obispo Housing Authority is requesting $1.98 million for three housing projects: the Blackstone Hotel Senior Housing Project; low-income family housing on Pismo Street; and low income housing for disabled persons, on Brizzolara at Nipomo Street. The recommended CDBG program includes $1 million in Section 108 loan funds to be used for one or more of these affordable housing projects. The Housing Authority also requests transfer of$100,000 in FY 1994 funds from the High Street Family Apartments to purchase property on Beach Street for affordable family apartments. The Authority also requests $12,000 for the Children's Work Incentive Program, a program offering work rewards and incentives to at-risk youth; and $10,000 toward upkeep of the City's Homeless Shelter. Staff supports transferring the $100K in FY 1994 func - for the Housing Authority's proposed Pismo Street housing projects. The Children's Woi -centive Program is not recommended for funding since the City already exceeds its pu' services limit, and while this is a worthwhile program, the recommended projects appear to be higher priorities based on current funding. The Homeless Shelter "replacement" reserve fund would provide the initial funding for an on-going fund to replace or repair the shelter. HUD rules favor specific funding requests (for specified work), rather than use of funds to build up a fund reserve. Consequently, funding is not recommended at this time. City Or San LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Staff Report Page 15 Runaway and Homeless Youth Transitional Housing. LifeSteps Foundation, Inc. Requests $294,650 to purchase a six-unit apartment building in San Luis Obispo. The apartments would provide transitional or permanent housing for very-low and low-income runaway youth. Five studio units would be used for housing, and one would be used for offices, support services, and community room. CDBG funds would meet about two-thirds of the $445,000 cost to purchase and rehabilitate the property. The project would provide temporary housing and support services for youth coming out of the Homeless Shelter or County Foster Care program for whom standard housing is not available or affordable. The project has the support of the SLO Special Needs Housing Consortium (letter attached), and it appears to meet a demonstrated community need. Given current CDBG funding and previous funding commitments, staff does not support funding at this time. Women and Children Transitional Housing. LifeSteps Foundation, Inc. Requests $399,500 to purchase six apartment units of permanent affordable housing for women and children with special needs. The units would be available to women and children affected by problems of substance abuse, mental illness, homelessness and domestic violence. The project involves the purchase of two tri-plexes, located on adjacent lots in the City of San Luis Obispo. LifeSteps would provide 24-hour supervision, as well as on- and off-site support services. While the project meets a community need and is an eligible CDBG activity, staff does not support funding at this time due to other higher priorities for funding during FY 1996. Senior Home Repair Program. The Economic Opportunity Commission requests $220,000 to help low- and moderate-income seniors to repair or upgrade their homes. This is proposed as a Countywide program, with funding also requested from the other jurisdictions in the Urban County. The work would involve weatherizing to conserve energy, installing safety improvements, removing architectural barriers, repairing leaky plumbing, and general repairs in rural and urban homes. This is an eligible CDBG activity which meets a community need, however staff does not recommend funding the program at this time due to other higher funding priorities for FY 1996. N. * LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC. RECEIVED FEB 5 tyy6 CrrYQFe$ w Dana Lilly Department of Planning and Building County Government Center San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 1 /30/1996 Dear Mr. Lilley; As a member of the San Luis Obispo Supportive Housing Consortium, we support Life Steps Foundation's efforts in their application for Community Development Block Grants funding. We are cognizant of the need to increase supportive housing to special needs client populations (homeless, mental health, domestic violence and substance abuse) in the city of San Luis Obispo. In the past year we have conjointly met to explain our common needs and to plan a long term housing strategy. We, at Life Steps have a written signed enforceable lease option on two properties within San Luis Obispo city limits. The project on Iris St., will be available to clients of the Housing Consortium, and the property on Chorro is available to emancipated youths. We look forward to these new resources in our county. Undersigned r( , ache) ichardson - AIDS SUPPORf NETWORfC�' 1306 HIGUERA STREET - SAN LUIS OBISPO - CALIFORNIA 93401 (805) 549-0150 - FAX(805)549-8973 M rianne Kennedy IIWOMEOtHELTER Ja Amanzio - OUNTY ME L HEALTH i _ UA. G .� Gwen Guyre - E C A/7/7 Tis0WJ Ann Travers -HOMELESS SERVICES COORDINATOR/DSS Tina Metzger - yo"-r f Bu►L-D Rae Belle Gamb - I (ALLIANCE FOR MENTALLY ILL) .job SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING ALEX HINDS DIRECTOR BRYCE TINGLE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ELLEN CARROLL FEBRUARY 29, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR BARNEY MCCAY CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TO: INTERESTED PERSONS NORMA SALISBURY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER FROM: DANA LILLEY, SENIOR PLANNER VIA: ALEX HINDS,DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SUBJECT: DRAFT 1996 ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN PORTION OF COUNTY'S CONSOLIDATED PLAN The attached information is being provided to you because you have expressed an interest in receiving information regarding the county's planning process and documents associated with the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships programs. The attached materials include the draft one-year action plan and the public notice advertising the public hearings which have scheduled for review and approval of the 1996 Consolidated Plan. There is no charge for these materials. The county's first consolidated plan was prepared and approved in 1995. It included discussions of housing and community development needs,resources,a five-year strategic planning chapter, and a one-year action plan for the program year beginning July 1, 1995. This year a new one- year action plan must be prepared for the program year beginning July 1, 1996,the draft of which is attached. The main body of the 1995 Consolidated Plan is not proposed to be substantially revised. If you have any questions about activities proposed for finding,or why other activities are not proposed for funding,you can call me(Dana Lilley)at(805)781-5715. Specific questions about activities proposed in the cities should be directed to those cities. COUNn GOVERNMENT CENTER - SAN LUIS OBNO - CALFORNIA 93408 - (805) 781-5600 - FAx (805) 781-1242 OR 5624 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING PROPOSED" 1996 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CONSOLIDATED PLAN WHO: Public hearings will be held by the Atascadero City Council,Grover Beach City Council, Pismo Beach City .Council,Paso Robles.City Council,San Luis Obispo City.Council and San Luis Obispo County.Board.of:Supervisors. . WHEN AND WHERE: Atascadero City Council-7:00 P.M'., April 9, 1996, Rotunda Room(4th Floor), 9500 Palma•Avenue Grover Beach City Council-7:30 P.M., April 1, 1996, City Council Chambers, 154 South Eighth Street, Grover Beach Pismo Beach City Council-6:30 P.M., April 2, 1996, City Council Meeting Room, 760 Mattie Rd. Pismo Beach Paso Robles City Council-7:00 P.M., April 2, 1996, City Library Conference Room, 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles San Luis.Obispo City Council-7:00 P.M., April 2, 1996, City.Council Chambers, 990 Pahn.Street, San Luis Obispo I:u San ii Obispo County Board of Su off-:9:00•A:M., April•9, 1996', ai: d Apiil'23, 1996; Board of Su'p'ervisors- Chambers, County Government Center, San Luis Obispo In addition, the county Planning and Building Department will conduct three public workshops prior to the public hearings listed above to provide for extra public input and to answer public questions about the draft 1996 Consolidated Plan. These workshops will be held.as-follows: . March 11, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. - City Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. March 14, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. -City Library Conference Room,'1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles. March 15, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. - Oceano Community Services District, 1655 Front Street, Oceano. WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED: The county.of San�Luis`Oliispo, Planning ind Building Impartment, working in cooperation with Lhe cities of Atascadero, Grover Beach, Paso Robles, Pismo Beach and San Luis Obispo has prepared a consolidated plan pursuant to the requirements of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. The consolidated plan will enable the county and above named cites to receive funding through certain federal grant programs. Three basic goals have been incorporated into the federal laws which authorize and govern this consolidated plan. First, the programs are intended to provide decent housing. Second, they are to provide a suitable living environment. The third major goal is to expand economic opportunities. Each of these goals are directed to benefit persons whose incomes are below 80 percent of area median income. The county Planning and Building Department acted as the lead agency in preparing this plan. However,each of the cities collaborated with the county throughout the process of conducting citizen participation activities and preparing the plan. The draft consolidated plan includes an assessment of housing and community development needs, an analysis of the housing market,an analysis of non-housing community development needs,a five year strategic plan, and a one-year action plan. The one-year action plan describes activities proposed for funding through the county's 1996 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) programs. While the county has not yet received notice from HUD regarding the amounts of the urban county's 1996 .mula grants, the county believes they drill be as follows: $2,825,000 from the Community Development Block Grant Program(CDBG) ; $969,000 from the Home Investment Partnership Program(HOME); and$92,000 from the Emergency Shelter.Grant Program(ESG)..,Approximate recommended funding levels in the draft one-year plan ae as follows: Affordable Housing $1,719,000 Public Facilities $7399000 Public Services $3619000 Economic Development $4579000 Planning/Capacity Building $274,000 Administration $304,000 CONTACT: If you have any questions about this proposal, you can contact Dana Lilley in the San Luis Obispo County Department of Planning and Building, County Government Center, San Luis Obispo, California 93408 (805)781 -5715. WHAT'S AVAILABLE: Copies of the plan will be available starting on Monday, February 26, 1996, at the County Department of Planning and Budding, County Government Center, San Luis Obispo, California. Copies of the plan will also be placed in the county library system. Staff reports for the public hearings will be available a few days before each ' hearing. WHERE YOUCOME IN-'Your comments and'questions are invited.•Public comments will be considered by the hearing bodies as they approve the content of the consolidated Plan and funding for specific activities. If you favor certain activities it are being considered for funding, you should express your views in writing or verbally at the hearings. All comments eived during the public workshops and hearings, and any written correspondence, will summarized and attached to the plan when it is transmitted to HUD in May. DATED: Julie Rodewald, Deputy County Clerk B (SEAL) Part IV. One-Year Action Plan (24 CFR 91.220) Available Federal Resources - The county has prepared this one-year action plan primarily to describe the activities proposed for funding through the county's 1996 CDBG and HOME programs. The amounts of these resources expected to be available in the 1996 program year are as follows: Table 11: Available Federal Resources Source Amount 1996 CDBG Program $2,825,000 CDBG Program Income $46,700 1996 HOME Program $969,000 Total $398409700 * NOTES:4'he�subrecipient C'ity,of San-Luis,Obispo prbposesto request from-HUD$-1.485 million through the Section 108 Loan Program,to be used for various affordable housing projects and an airport area specific plan. Also,the county intends to decline its ESG formula allocation from HUD to enable local applications to the state ESG program for much greater ESG funding levels. The cooperative agreements between the county and five participating cities allocate the CDBG funds as follows: Table 12: Allocations of Available CDBG Funds . SAICTICOI�I 1996 ROG3......A7GII�UIL FORIV�UI,A 1NCUME 1996 ABG .:GssI�:i, • 'i.. Atascadero $248,600 $0 $248,600 Paso Robles $264,138 $54,562 $318,700 San Luis Obispo $953,720 $0 $953,720 Grover Beach $135,854 $0 $135,854 Pismo Beach $135,854 $0 $135,854 Special urban projects fund $163,025 $0 $163,025 Unincorporated county $923,809 $50,000' $973,809 TOTAL $29825,000 $1049562 $2,9299562 * NOTE:The county anticipates receiving$45,000 in program income from repaid CDBG loans,but already has $5,000. Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) Page 1 San Luis Obispo County Other,non-formula federal resources which are expected to be available for use.in the county during the next year include the RECD(FmHA) Section 502,HUD Section S, HOPWA, Supportive Housing,FEMAand the MCC,programs. The amounts of these.funds whickwillbe.. available is not yet known Other Resources The county expects that funds m4y.he available in the next year from.the.Califomia.Housing Finance Agency for mortgage assistance to.middle-income, and possibly some low-and moderate-income families. Also, some funds are available from the Department of Economic Opportunity to.assist with operation of the•homeless shelter in San Luis Obispo. Private funds from lending institutions for short-term construction loans and for long-term home purchase loans will be available. Funds through two redevelopment agencies and the United Way are expected to be made available in the next year,but their amounts are as yet unknown. Certain fees can be waived by the county or its cities for affordable housing developments. The county exempts some public agencies and nonprofit organizations from paying property taxes on affordable rental housing. tliey own arici operate. Iri"soiree'instances,the county or cities may require dedication'of land fol affordable housing as a condition of approval for major projects. These local resources,and others the county will continue to pursue,can be used to meet the 25 percent local match requirement of the HOME program. Finally,another source of match for the HOME program is the labor savings which occurs during construction of affordable homes in the "self-help" method. Leveraging of Resources The county has selected the activities to assist with the limited formula-based federal fluids available in a manner which maximizes the amount of other funds which will be leveraged. For :example;the home.ornss : . Prob,..�sr�.n,. usalk . rev. .. e:about_fourto.five typ y :. . . amount of CDBG or HOME funds being lea to a low-and moderate-income family. Where possible,the county has also emphasized loans of its formula funds,rather than outright grants,to maximize the recycling of the fiords and extend their benefit to low-and moderate- income families into the future. Activities to be Undertaken The activities the county intends to implement with the formula funds(CDBG,HOME)made available.during the next year, in combination with other funds,are listed in the two tables . shown in the following pages. More detailed descriptions can be found in the HUD tables located in the appendix. The relationship of the activities to the priorities in this plan are as follows: Page 2 Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) Affordable Housing Strategy: Priority#1:'Increase first-time home ownership opportunities for low-and moderate- income households. $378,460 in 1996 HOME and CDBG funds are allocated in this one-year plan for development of new affordable ownership housing for low-and moderate-income households. Most of the funds allocated to this priority last.year have not yet been expended. Priority#2: Increase availability of affordable and decent rental housing for low- and moderate-income persons and families. $1.17 million in 1996 HOME and CDBG funds are allocated for this priority. Also, the subrecipient City of San Luis Obispo proposes to use up to $1 million in HUD Section 108 Loan funds for provision of decent and affordable rental housing. Priority#3: Maintain and upgrade existing neighborhoods and housing units occupied by low-and moderate-income households. . Only $54,087 in CDBG funds are funded for this priority in the current program year, but it will be considered again in future years. Addressing Homelessness: Priority#1: Prevent homelessness by enabling people to obtain or retain decent affordable housing and supportive services. This priority is being addressed in the current program year through CDBG and HOME fimding for affordable housing developments, as identified above. Priority#2: Provide needed emergency shelter facilities ind related services. This priority is being addressed through CDBG funding for operation of the SLO homeless shelter and CDBG finding for establishment of a homeless service center. Economic Development Strategy: Priority#1: Establish a revolving loan fund and other forms of business assistance to enable businesses to create or retain jobs. CDBG funding is being provided by the county to the Economic Vitality Corporation for a business assistance program. The coTmty is also providing CDBG funds for a small business . assistance center started by Cuesta College. Atascadero is allocating CDBG funds to a revolving loan program for qualified businesses. Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) Page 3 2 CanT.nicnhi¢ rnnnty Priority.#2c Promote the county as a desirable location for new or relocating'businesses. This priority cannot be met with CDBG or HOME finding,but the EVC will address it-in the. . .. future(using non-CDBG funding). Public Facilities and Services Strategy: Priority#1: Provide assistance to communities that consist primarily ofl_ow-and moderate- income..persons and cannot afford necessary public facilities or services. .This priority is being met through.CDBG funding for.a water storage.facility in Shandon and . handicapped accessibility improvements in San Luis Obispo and Atascadero. Table 13: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 1996 CDBG-FUNDED ACTIVITIES ::;:..: . Activity name& Locahon(s}; Citations CDBG Allneation +®BG Funds esc flop k»p y ; ource (241C 5.7.0 ) Pablicsernces ' Homeless.shelter,EOC; 736 Orcutt Road(shelter), 201(e)&208(a)(2)(I)(A) County($38,875) 5290,000 other public services other sites to be County-special urban determined,'San Luis projects fund.($91,125) Obispo SLO City($160,000) Homeless day center Prado Road,San Luis 201(e)&208(ax2)(I)(A) County-special urban' $80,000 operation Obispo projects fund($40,000) SLO City($40,000) Boystc*ls Club Oceano 201(e)&208(a)(2)(I)(A) County $25,000 operation Ca�imity.Services Afauadero=io=be:' '201(e)2i 208taj(2)(I)(c)' ?ita3cadeio 'S5;525 Foundation Youth determined Activity Scholarship Subtotal for public services 13.49% $400,525 Page 4 . Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(0228/96) ttj ' ...5..:...::..;......:...;tn.:;s.:...,...,.:.<...;......:...,....:...;....;...S...S...:.�...n:................:.....,n.:..r..:...:....;...:...:...::.y:.::.y:.;:s:.:::.;:.:n...:..,...,.....:..3..s.n:..s..:...:..:.:.....:....:...r'..:...:.:..:...S..v:..i,..:....:<...:..i...i..i....`..:;...:...:3..:..:...'....E..3rA.�r',,.i::...,.:r ...................:..:..`...r...n...v..n:...r.:.:.:....,.nnom.:...:...:.:.:...�::.:.:...:..:.:.:.:.:�.'...r....�.e..n?...:xY.:8..::..:..:.5:.v.i:"s.>.:.:...::.s: ..v.:....... :. ::.:::::......... POb'hC;BeiRWM:'. .. :.: : Shandon water storage Shandon 2010& County $356,647 tank and transmission 208(a)(1)(iv) line,.CSA-16,Zone 1 Construction of homeless Prado Road,City of San 2010& County-special urban $75,000 day center Luis Obispo . 208(aX2)(1)(A) projects fund($25,000) SLO City($50,000) Seismic retrofit of Bldg Ocean 201(k)& Oceano $27,500 for Boys/Girls Club 208(b)(2) Pave driveway for N.Co. Location confidential 201®& County-special urban $6,900 Women's Shelter 208(a)(2)(I)(A) projects fund various public facilities, San Luis Obispo 2010&208(a)(2)(1)(A) SLO City $182,000 SLO City ADA Improvements to Atascadero City Hall, 201(k)& Atascadero $15,500 Atauadero.City:'. 6500,PalmaAve., 208(a)(2)(IXA) :. Administration Building Atascadero Recreation 6351 Olmeda Ave, 2010& Atascadero $20,160 Center,City of Atascadero 208(b)(2) Atascadero Hazardous Fut-Apparatus Atascadero Fre Stations . 201C& Atascadero $30,000 Exhaust Clean Air One&Two 208(b)(2) System,City of Atascadero Subtotal Public Facilities $713,707 Ppm!eTvep' St7elo . Economic development . County-wide 203(6)&2Q1(o)&. County($85,0001996 $13Q,000 rCvoi*gidah-progiarq:.:: :•.: :.::..:..: `208(a)(4) p i.. EVC income,if available) Cuesta Small Business County-wide 201(o)& County $65,000 Assistance Program 208(a)(2)(D) Economic development Atascadero 203(b)&201(0)& Atascadero $100,000 revolving loan program 208(aX4) Innovative development Atascadero 203(b)&201(0)& Atssc adero $30,000 ctr(business incubator) 208(a)(4) SLO Seismic Retrofit San Luis Obispo-to be 202(a)(3)& SLO City $100,000 Loan Program,SLO City determined 208(6)(2) Seismic Retrofit Designs, Paso Robles-to be 202(a)(3)and Paso Robles $76,500 Paso Robles Main Street determined 202(bX9)& 208(b)(2) Subtotal economic development $501,50011 Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) Page 5 0 23 San Luis Obispo Cottttty ;.}vr.}i"::!�{ii:.}i:�i:rf:::::::.�n::::..:?n:n?.J..n.:::::::.r. .r....r...n .:................ .......iv....?:.•. ........ ...: %.'.vp}.'.v.r.:r.ry:. .... .:.. .a ..... v....::::.: .......v.. ...n.. .....n..S................. .........r....... :r.r....{.a.t,.....N........ :}:4$.:i..i?"::::n}:'i::: .. .. .. .:.::::.:n..:...::::rv:v: ..:..:N:..::::.{.$:i:$$•:::..::.n{.:: .. .v:n....:f.).}2$:"vti n:.\.}:{:i':l?P;{:i:i....a{'::.:.:{%::}::.::}i,'Y:il.:i::v}�:: .... .v:'v:i.:{.::.:........v.. ..:::n.Ayrn:n::::........mt':. i:...::. :i:..y:.':i{.ri ♦:.::.iw. 3 n:J•..v. .Tv...»rvnP:.:.i'.i�::i::i::ihl::` :.}}}:.iiW..ffi:^}': ....:...v. .. ...... ,.............. ...nv.inrr::::::.:::.i:nw: .v... .:: ..: "'v:n::::.v .v:::.:ni'.Y•f}x$::{P}'. '�i::::,>.f:>..:.:.n:.v:::v.:ii»::.. �n^.:..v::.{j�. '»:..yr.in::.::v:n:nw.::n.:.+.. ::. p•:.i::.::.:.C.y ..x ..... .::: ...n P:.Jii}J:.::{!�}i:.}:P}::::.•:: v: .. '..,i:ii{.:}$i%.::P:::v.}::::: :..r:::.::.r...:::.:::1�::. .,.,..n...:.. ..v...... . .............. ....:......a ..:8t Ott.. h...... r.. • .:n.n .:.. .:............nr....n....:.nJ............'!1{ •.:::::n r: :.. ..........n�-:::� ..:. '?Y•.j:':{.}:.}i::f:4':.i::fj:::R�•:\P' .:......a..::::..::n..:.•:n..:.:::x..:i n........:.:....hr.::}?`nv:n..rv....:.}......... n.f:n:.:::. ..�.:. �.A)........... .:.i:..::J... ..M....n:..Y.v:' {{::Y.?h:':i.?:i?n.`-:i+ :}.i'. . .........a .:••.,�.....•. Y.....•...av,:inPAn:.•.i.v:.n(.. ....:.:::�Y.{..,h�.,.t:,. n�?:.;�/'{::::: .....:::::::n 'n............. .... «...n. .............. .R....... .................... ... .........................n.,..nnr..:...............,e}Y.irc..::}?}i5>••a:i,.•."'..Pi$;,.,f:.i.,: r.}.............. ::^.:•x..::.wR,. r:.:.....n:.....a.::•:n:..,>.}:f:{:.:::.v::.:::::.�:.}::.:::,::x,.::.�:............. ..r.::::.n..r.:: .,..x ...... .............:................. .. .n...::.:::.::::: ....:r:.:.�::::o................ ... {.?::�::.�. :..::::::.::.�::::.v: r.n.».........a.: :.r....:....a......r r.}}'s;.;.}:.a:.,r,.::::.}i:.:�,.. ..i..... ............:::::: .::...::::..:: .:..... ...::..::n..v.fn.::..:::.:.u.n.:.:.xr.?:.u.i$iii�:: .r'.:ii}i'.? .......... nn...........fi'iv'�::..v:::}:f}..._:.v....................:::.:i::'{f:{U..:P?':n.:..v::::::::.:n. rv..::.fn.::::.iiy. ::.v:::nv:.. h,.:.v::'u':.:W::v.ii`i i}....'.,..... ............... .....n:::::::.a.. ..:..n nn..: ...:.....::: .i...::n h. ....... ............ Affordable housing SLO City 201(a)&202& SLO City $270,976 208(a)(2)(I)(C) South Grover Beach Grover Beach 20.1(&)& Grover Beach: $135,854 Affordable Housing 208(a)(2XI)(C) Development,City of Grover Beach Acquisition of rental Pismo Beach 201(n)& Pismo Beach $135,854 housing by Peoples'Self- 208(a)(2)(1)(C) Help Housing Corp First-time Home buyers Paso Robles-to be 201(n)& Paso Robles $178,460 Assistance Programs City determined 208(a)(2)(1)(C) of Paso Robles Home repair program by County-wide 202& County $54,087 EOC 208(a)(2)(n(L) Subtotal housing . � $775,231 . Plan4ing;& CapacIty%build►ng SLO Airport Area SLO Airport Area 205(a)(4)(I) County($55,000) $150,372 Specific Plan SLO City($95,000) City of Paso Robles Paso Robles 205(a)(3)(1) Paso Robles $31,870 Capacity Building Program Prepare Economic County-wide 205(a)(3Xiii) County $40,000 Element(County) City ofAtascadero Atascadero 205(a)(3Xini) Atacadero $23,707 zcity Bwldip%: ._ Program, Special needs housing County-wide 205(a)(3)(b County $5,000 plannmPIespacity building Implementation of County-wide 205(a)(3)(1)&(iii) County $10,000 County Housing Element and Economic Development Programs Subtotal Planning&cap capacity building $260949 Page 6 Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) �'� tic'tnriiy name& Loration(s) Cttahouis CDBGi Allocation ;CDBGil;unds->: desct�pflon eli &meati obj Source Program .. admrnistrahon i County oversight,CDBG County-wide 206(a)&(b) County $150,000 administration Grover Beach&Pismo Cities of Grover Beach 206(a)&(b) County $16,700 Beach CDBG and Pismo Beach administration SLO City CDBG SLO City 206(a)&(b) SLO City $95,372 administration Paso Robles CDBG Paso Robles 206(a)&(b) Paso Robles $31,870 administration Atascadero CDBG Atascadero 206(a)&(b) Atascadero $23,708 administration Subtotal program administration 5317,650 Fercen€plannmg„capaerty boildmg and adm0mstration(20%maximum) 14 48% Per�entpubhcserJica(15%p;maxnmum) _ '" 1349°l . Percent lienefrtto low&moderate income i*#d s(70%mimmnru) 8519% fatal for CDB $S2 .6 Table 14: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 1996 HOME ACTIVITIES ALLiJtC'A'FT©At € 1996 HUME: New ownership housing(CHDO set-aside for Peoples'Self-Help Housing Corp)-Nipomo $200,000. New rental housing(CHDO set-aside for Peopla'Self-Help Housing Corp) 5200,000 New rental housing-Templeton (CHDO set-aside for People Self-Help Housing Corp) $200,000 Acquire rental housing for rebab-Blackstone Hotel,SLO City(SLO Housing Authority) 5250,000 CHDO operating/capacity building(People's Self-Help Housing Corp) 550,000 CHDO operating/capacity building(Affordable Homes,Inc) $23,000 Administration(-4.7%) $46,000 otals .:. T .," } Table 15: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO(SUBRECIPIENT) 1996 SECTION 108 FUNDED ACTIVITIES Various affordable housing programs $1,000,000 Airport Area Specific Plan $485,000 Draft 1996 Consolidated Plan(02/28/96) Page 7 2—;Z7San Luis Obispo County