HomeMy WebLinkAboutParcel History - City Michael B Stanton, PLS 5702 Msg: 805.594.1960
3559 So. Higuera St. Fax: 805.594-1966
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Email: kmargason@mbslandsurvys.com
Parcel History
This request for an unconditional Certificate of Compliance for 2100 Slack Street, APN 073-341-
008, is based on the County’s recognition of legality of the adjacent portion of the southwest
quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 24, T30S, R12E, lying northerly of Slack Street.
The County based their decision on California Government Code section 66499.34 (see below)
and the County’s issuance of several development and building permits issued on APN 073-341-
008, exclusively, without consideration of the parcel to the South, lying within the City limits.
Section 66499.34: “The issuance of a permit or grant of approval for development of
real property, or with respect to improvements that have been completed prior to the
time a permit for approval of development was required by local ordinances in effect at
the time of the improvement, or with respect to improvements that have been
completed in reliance upon a permit or grant of approval for development, shall
constitute “real property which has been approved for development,” for the purposes
of subdivision (c) of Section 66499.35, and upon request by the person owning the real
property or a vendee of such person pursuant to a contract of sale, the local agency
shall issue a certificate of compliance for the affected real property.”
Documents related to several building permits are included in this submittal, per the City’s
request. While there are several additional building permits that pertain to Section 66499.34
above, it was determined that it would be redundant and time consuming for County staff to
upload them all because Section 66499.34 only requires one such permit. With the issuance of
the County Certificate of Compliance, this portion of the property becomes a remainder.
The City’s municipal code, section 16.18.045 requires a certificate or conditional certificate of
compliance for remainder parcels. An unconditional certificate is being requested based on the
parcel’s zoning combination of R-1-S and CO/S. This parcel meets the minimum parcel size,
depth and width requirements for R-1 zoning and the S (special consideration) designation will
require a minor use permit prior to any development allowing the City ample discretionary
review prior to issuing any permits.
If the City determines a conditional certificate of compliance is necessary, the conditions placed
on the certificate shall be consistent with the general plan and zoning ordinance in place at the
time Mr. Stimson obtained his ownership interest, October 27, 1975. At the time, the property
was zoned residential single family. I have included the City Council minutes of 10/11/1977
discussing the rezoning.
It does not appear that any public improvements need to be installed in the area, as it is rural
in nature and necessary public improvements would have been constructed with the
neighboring Monterey Heights development.