HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsultant Evaluation Form BW - 2001070 South BroadSouth Broad Street Corridor Planning & Demonstration Project
SPECIFICATION NO. 2001070
July 2026
CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM
Reviewer Name: Bryan Wheeler
Consultant: Kimley-Horn
Category Notes Points (from 0
to 10)
Responsiveness &
Understanding (40%)
Complete proposal.
All required forms included.
Clear and concise proposal
layout.
Demonstrates thorough
understanding project.
Complete
+ detailed section
+ easy to understand layout
- Not local
- Cited Caltrans instead of FHWA as lead NEPA (not a huge
deal)
8
Previous Project
Experience (20%)
Experience of firm.
Resumes of staff.
Other projects, including grant
projects, are referenced and
applicable.
+ Has experience in recent similar planning projects
+ SRTS Grant project in references\
+ Previous SLO City planning grant experience
+ Project Manager was PM for SRTS project
+ Has a project reference with a quick-build component
- No SS4A experience
9
Proposed Timeframe and
Schedule (20%)
Reasonable schedule proposed
and all elements of RFP included
+ Schedule looks complete & Reasonable
+ All elements included in schedule
10
Proposed Project Cost
(20%)
Proposal includes hourly rates
Proposal indicates work will be
completed under estimate of
$210,000
+ Cost is within budget
+ Hourly rate and division of labor seems reasonable
+ Clear breakdown of roles and reasonable assignment
+ Additional tasks are reasonable in scope and cost
10
Point Total
37
South Broad Street Corridor Planning & Demonstration Project
SPECIFICATION NO. 2001070
July 2026
CONSULTANT EVALUATION FORM
Reviewer Name: Bryan Wheeler
Consultant: Rick / Kittleson
Category Notes Points (from 0
to 10)
Responsiveness &
Understanding (40%)
Complete proposal.
All required forms included.
Clear and concise proposal
layout.
Demonstrates thorough
understanding project.
Nearly complete, missing a schedule
Project seems understood
- Not local planning, but local civil
7
Previous Project
Experience (20%)
Experience of firm.
Resumes of staff.
Other projects, including grant
projects, are referenced and
applicable.
+ Has experience in some recent similar planning projects
+ SS4A Grant project in references
+ Previous SLO County planning grant experience
+ Project Manager was PM for SLO County previously
- Did not assign roles in proposal, so unsure what capacity
staff will be working on project
- No extensive Public Outreach plan with details
- Would like to see a reference where the two companies
have worked together on a project
- Proposal says PM has SS4A experience, but that project is
not referenced.
7
Proposed Timeframe and
Schedule (20%)
Reasonable schedule proposed
and all elements of RFP included
Schedule not included 0
Proposed Project Cost
(20%)
Proposal includes hourly rates
Proposal indicates work will be
completed under estimate of
$210,000
+ Cost is within budget
+ Hourly rate and division of labor seems reasonable
- Would like a clear breakdown of roles assignments,
especially between the companies
9
Point Total
23