Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/23/1996, 1 - CREEK SETBACK ORDINANCE counaL7 D� _ 9 A] AQcn0A Upoat ,�Numbff CITY O F SAN LUIS OB I S P O O FROM: Arnold B. Jon Community Development Director Prepared By: Glen Matteso , ssociate Planner SUBJECT: Creek Setback Ordinance CAO RECOMMENDATION Introduce an ordinance to approve the negative declaration of environmental impact, to add creek setback provisions to the Zoning Regulations, and to authorize printing the ordinance in summary form for public notice. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Council has received and considered a draft ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission (April 16, 1996, agenda report). In response to Council direction on April 16, May 14, and June 18, staff has prepared a revised draft ordinance which differs from the Planning Commission recommendation. DISCUSSION Background Summary The creek setback ordinance, which has been under preparation for several years, would implement adopted City policies. Resolving all the details has been difficult, due to competing interests and the absence of a single correct approach. The recommended ordinance reflects staff's effort to incorporate all direction from previous Council meetings, emphasizing the most recent, and to respond to Council and public questions. Revised Ordinance Some details of the ordinance now before the Council differ from the draft recommended at the June 18 meeting: • The definition of"riparian vegetation" is simpler and, in conjunction with a list of native riparian species, accomplishes the intent of the definition presented June 18. The current definition avoids differing interpretations of the earlier definition, such as whether a species is considered noxious. The adjective "significant" has been deleted because it adds no clarification to the currently proposed criteria of plant species and location. • The specific listing of features which could be located in setbacks and the limitations on those features have been clarified and made more consistent with terms used in the building code. Council Agenda Report - Creek Setback Ordinance Page 2 • The attached ordinance does not designate creeks as "major," "intermediate," or "minor" for setback purposes, though the setbacks of 50, 35, and 20 feet for certain identified creeks would remain. Deleting the category names avoids two problems. First, the names have been criticized as implying that some riparian corridors are not important. Second, the terms are very similar to, but do not mean exactly the same thing as, the three-part classification used by the "Uniform Storm Design Criteria" in the Flood Management Policy, adopted in 1983 (which refers to sizes of the tributary areas). • The section of the adopting ordinance which "grandfathered" setbacks set by previous discretionary approvals has been moved to the body of the regulations (part 17.16.025.E.4, on page 3). Also, a reference to adoption of Special Considerations (S) Zone standards has been added to this part's listing of other types of approvals such as use permits and subdivisions. (This addition responds to concerns by property owners subject to the S zone that was added in 1989 to commercial properties along upper Monterey Street, adjacent to San Luis Obispo Creek, including the Motel Inn site.) The approach of allowing "footprint" replacement of strictures in the setback, but no additional floor area, is retained. As with all limitations on features in setbacks, an applicant could request and, upon making required findings, the City could approve an exception to this limitation. The criteria for discretionary exceptions have not been changed. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts associated with the recommended action. CONCURRENCES The Public Works Department and the Natural Resources Manager concur with the recommendation. ALTERNATIVES The Council may introduce the ordinance with different provisions from those recommended. Substantial changes to the proposed regulations may need additional staff work or environmental review, so continuation with direction would be appropriate. Council rejection of any ordinance would result in the need to delete from the General Plan those policies and programs which call for an ordinance. Such amendments would have to be considered at a future hearing. The Council would need to address the issue of adequate environmental mitigation, consistent with the Land Use Element Update Environmental Impact Report, which the Council previously certified. The Council may continue action. There is no action deadline. Attachments Draft ordinance Draft ordinance synopsis Native riparian vegetation list CAR7-23.cso /04 ORDINANCE NO. (1996 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING CREEK SETBACK PROVISIONS TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted public meetings on March 8, April 26, July 19, and September 27, 1995, and a public hearing on January 24, 1996, and recommended approval of a creek setback ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public meeting on April 16, 1996 and public hearings on May 14, June 18, and July 23, 1996, and has considered testimony of interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed creek setback provisions are consistent with, and are required to implement, the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the draft Negative Declaration of environmental impact as prepared by staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission (ER 145- 94). BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines that the project's Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential significant environmental impacts of the proposed zoning map amendment, and reflects the independent judgement of the City Council. The Council hereby adopts said Negative Declaration. SECTION 2. The Zoning Regulations are hereby amended by those additions concerning creek setbacks which are fully contained in Exhibit A, attached. SECTION 3. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty (30) days after its final passage. Ordinance No. Page 2 INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo at its meetings held on the day of 1996, on a motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor Allen K. Settle ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 5i- Clrr►�O o U City Attrney ordform.cso Ordinance No. EXHIBIT A Creek Setback Provisions Added to Zoning Regulations Add to Chapter 17.04, Definitions: 17.04.093 Creek "Creek" is a waterway or portion of waterway designated as a creek on the Open Space Element Creek Map. A drainage ditch, concrete swale, underground culvert, or storm drain (as indicated on the Creek Map) is not a creek. Creeks located outside the urban reserve line are as designated by the USGS 7.5 Minute series quadrangle maps or San Luis Obispo County data. 17.04.342 Riparian vegetation. "Riparian vegetation" means those native herbaceous plants, shrubs, and trees which are naturally associated with stream side environments, and all trees with roots and branches extending in or over a creek channel. (A list of native riparian vegetation is available at the Community Development Department.) 17.04.440 Top of bank. "Top of bank" means the line where the naturally eroded ground slope, or the slope resulting from a creek alteration, flattens to conform with the ground which has not been cut by water flow within the creek channel. If the bank is terraced, the top of bank is the highest step. Add pan d to Section 17.16.020.E.1, Property Development Standards - Yards - Exceptions Property May Be Entitled To: d. Reduced Street Yards for Replacement Structures Providing Creek Setback. Where this title does not require a replacement structure to provide the creek setback that is required for a new structure, the required street yard shall be reduced one foot for each one foot of creek setback provided by the replacement structure in addition to the setback of the structure being replaced, so long as the street yard is at least one-half that required by Table 2. f�� Exhibit A Page 2 Add to Chapter 17.16, Property Development Stanclarels. 17.16.025 Creek setbacks. A. Purpose. Creek setbacks are intended to: 1. Protect scenic resources, water quality, and natural creekside habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation, rest, and movement. 2. Further the restoration of damaged or degraded habitat, especially where a continuous riparian habitat corridor can be established. 3. Allow for natural changes that may occur within the creek corridor. 4. Help avoid damage to development from erosion and flooding. 5. Enable implementation of adopted City plans. B. Waterways Subject to Setbacks. Creek setback requirements shall apply to all creeks as defined in the Open Space Element and shown on that element's Creek Map, and only to those creeks. C. Measurement of Creek Setbacks. Creek setbacks shall be measured from the existing top of bank (or the future top of bank resulting from a creek alteration reflected in a plan approved by the City), or from the edge of the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation, whichever is farther from the creek flow line(Figure 4.1). The Community Development Director may determine the predominant pattern of riparian vegetation, where the edge of the vegetation vanes greatly in a short length along the creek, in a way unrelated to topography (for example, the Director will not base the setback line on individual trees or branches extending out from the channel or on small gaps in vegetation extending toward the channel). Where riparian vegetation extends over a public street, no creek setback is required on property which is on the side of the street away from the creek. , Figure 4.1 Creek Setback Measurement .' • a • . RIPARIAN VEGETATION .o F .~ .� 0 T TCP of p,F.O%N t1 •• REQUIRED SETBACK Exhibit A Page 3 D. Plan Information. The location of top of bank and of significant riparian vegetation shall be shown on all project plans subject to City approval. The location of these features is subject to confirmation by the Community Development Director, based on observation of actual conditions and, as needed, the conclusions of persons with expertise in hydrology, biology, or geology. E. Creek Setback Dimensions. Different setback dimensions are established in recognition of different parcel sizes and locations of existing structures for areas within the city in comparison with areas which may be annexed, and in response to different sizes of creek channels and tributary drainage areas. 1. Creeks within the 1996 City Limits. Along all creeks within the city limits as of July 1, 1996, the setback shall be 20 feet, except as provided in parts E.3, E.4 or G below. Where the city limit follows a creek, the setback on the side within the 1996 city limits shall be 20 feet and the setback on the annexed side shall be as provided in part 2 below. 2. Creeks in Areas Annexed After 1996. Along any creek in an area annexed to the City after July 1, 1996, the following setbacks shall be provided, unless a specific plan or development plan approved by the City Council provides a larger or smaller setback, consistent with the purpose of these regulations and with General Plan policies. a. Fifty-foot Setbacks. The setback along the following shall be 50 feet: San Luis Obispo Creek (all of main branch); San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork, from San Luis Obispo Creek (main branch) to the confluence with Acacia Creek; Stenner Creek. b. Thirty-five-foot Setbacks. The setback along the following shall be 35 feet: Prefumo Creek; Froom Creek; Brizziolari Creek; San Luis Obispo Creek East Fork tributary, from the confluence with Acacia Creek to Broad Street (Highway 227); Acacia Creek and its tributaries west of Broad Street (Highway 227); the segment of the tributary of Acacia Creek which flows generally parallel to and on the easterly side of Broad Street (Highway 227), from Broad.Street to Fuller Road. c. Twenty-foot Setbacks. The setback along all creeks except those listed in parts "a" and "b" immediately above shall be 20 feet. (Informational map is available in the Community Development Department.) 3. Larger Setbacks. In approving any discretionary application, the City may require setbacks larger than required by parts 1 and 2 above, or further limitations on the items which may be placed within setbacks to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts, or to enable implementation of adopted City plans. (Also, other City regulations may restrict or prevent development in a floodway or floodplain.) 4. Prior Approvals. Where the City has explicitly approved a creek setback smaller than required by this section, prior to adoption of this section, by action on a tract or parcel map (whether or not a vesting map), architectural review application, use permit, Planned Development zoning, or Special Considerations zoning, that smaller setback shall remain in effect so long as the approval is in effect. Exhibit A Page 4 G. Exceptions To Creek Setbacks. 1. Entitled Replacement Structures. Where a structure lawfully existed upon (the effective date of this chapter] within a creek setback required by this chapter: a. Any structure built in replacement of such a structure may occupy the same footprint, within the creek setback, as the previous structure. (See also part 17.16.020.E.l.d.) b. Additional floor area shall not be added to the encroaching part of the structure (for example, by adding stories). c. The part of a structure which is nonconforming due solely to the creek setback encroachment may be remodeled without regard to the limits of parts 17.14.020.B and C of this title. 2. Entitled Accessory Structures and Uses. The following items may be located within the required creek setback, provided that they: do not extend beyond the top of bank into the creek channel; will not cause the removal of native riparian vegetation; will not reduce any flooding capacity pursuant to the City's Flood Damage Prevention Regulations; in total occupy not more than one-half of the setback area; are consistent with other property development standards of the Zoning Regulations. a. Walls or fences, provided that in combination with buildings they enclose not more than one-half of the setback area on any development site b. Parking spaces for single-family dwellings; patios; walkways c. Decks, stairs, and landings which are no more than 30 inches in height d. One-story, detached buildings used as tool and storage sheds, play houses, and similar uses, provided the projected roof area does not exceed 120 square feet e. Garden structures such as trellises, arbors, and gazebos, provided they are constructed using an open lattice design and light weight materials 3. Entitled Architectural Features. The following architectural features may extend into the setback up to 30 inches: cornices, canopies, eaves, buttresses, chimneys, solar collectors, shading louvers, water heater enclosures, and bay or other projecting windows that do not include usable floor space. �+D Exhibit A Page 5 4. Discretionary Exceptions. a. Intent. Discretionary exceptions to creek setback standards are intended to allow reasonable use of sites which are subject to creek setbacks, where there is no practicable alternative to the exception. Generally, such exceptions are limited to small parcels which are essentially surrounded by sites that have been developed with setbacks smaller than those in part E above. b. Application Type. A creek setback smaller than required by part E above may be approved by City action on a plan for public facilities approved by the City Council or on a specific plan, development plan under planned development zoning, land division, use permit, or architectural review. Where one of these types of applications is not otherwise required for the proposed feature, an exception request shall be in the form of an administrative use permit. c. Public Notice. Public notice for a project involving a creek setback exception, regardless of application type, shall include a clear description of the feature or features proposed to receive the exception, and the extent of the exception. d. Findings. Each discretionary exception shall be subject to each of the following findings, regardless of the type of project application under which the request is considered. i The location and design of the feature receiving the exception will minimize impacts to scenic resources, water quality, and riparian habitat, including opportunities for wildlife habitation, rest, and movement; ii. The exception will not limit the City's design options for providing flood control measures that are needed to achieve adopted City flood policies; iii. The exception will not prevent the implementation of City-adopted plans, nor increase the adverse environmental effects of implementing such plans. iv. There are circumstances applying to the site, such as size, shape or topography, which do not apply generally to land in the vicinity with the same zoning, that would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity with the same zoning; V. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege —an entitlement inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. vi. The exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area of the project or downstream. �' 9 Exhibit A Page 6 e. Biological Survey. A biological survey by a qualified, independent person shall be required for each discretionary exception request, to provide the basis for making finding "e.i" above, unless waived by the Community Development Director upon determining that no purpose would be served by such a survey because no biological resources could be affected by the exception. f. Application Contents. In addition to any other information required for a project application, a request for creek setback exception shall include the following: L A description of the feature or features proposed for exception and the extent of the exception. ii. A description of potential design changes for the project which would eliminate or reduce the need for the exception. iii. A statement of reasons why an exception is deemed necessary by the applicant. iv. Mitigation proposed to offset any harmful effects of the exception. oRD723cc.cso /'fid [DRAFT SYNOPSIS] ORDINANCE NO. (1996 SERIES) CREEK SETBACKS On July 23, 1996, the San Luis Obispo City Council voted [ vote ] to introduce Ordinance No. which would add creek .setback standards to the Zoning Regulations. Following is a summary of the major features of the ordinance: • Setbacks would be required along all creeks mapped in the General Plan Open Space Element. Within the 1996 city limits, the basic setback would be 20 feet for all creeks. In annexation areas, basic setbacks would be 50 feet for major creeks, 35 feet for intermediate creeks, and 20 feet for minor creeks, all as described in the ordinance. The ordinance would recognize the potential for deciding creek protection corridors in the specific plans or development plans required for annexations. • Setbacks would be measured from top of bank, or from the edge of the predominant pattern of trees and shrubs which often grow along creeks, whichever is farther from the creek. • With some exceptions, the following would not be allowed in setbacks: buildings and other structures, including decks and stairs over 30 inches tall; parking lots; outdoor commercial and industrial work and storage areas. • The following could be located in creek setback areas so long as they did not, in total, occupy more than one-half of the setback area or extend into the creek channel: parking spaces for single-family houses, fencing, patios, walkways, small storage sheds and play structures, trellises and gazebos. Architectural features such as chimneys and bay windows could extend 30 inches into the required setback. • Existing buildings within required setbacks could be maintained and replaced, so long as their floor area within the setback does not increase. • Smaller setbacks approved by prior City actions would be allowed. • The City could approve a reduced setback where there is no option that would allow reasonable use of a site. The City body considering the exception request (typically along with other aspects of the project) would need to first hold a public hearing for which public notice has been given. The Council must vote again to approve this ordinance before it can take effect. That action is tentatively scheduled for August 20, 1996, at a Regular City Council meeting to begin at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Copies of the complete ordinance are available in the City Clerk's Office, Room No. 1 of City Hall. For more information, contact the Community Development Department at 781-7172. City Clerk [ORDSUM.CSO] City of San Luis Obispo NATIVE RIPARIAN VEGETATION LIST June 1996 TREES Alnus rhombifolia (White Alder) Acer macrophyllum (Bigleaf Maple) Acer negundo (Box Elder) Heteromeles arbutifolia (Toyon, California Holly) [may also be shrub] Juglans hindsii (California Black Walnut) Platanus racemosa (California Sycamore) Populus fremontii (Western Cottonwood) Populus trichocarpa (Black Cottonwood) Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) Salix spp. (willows) [may also be shrub] Umbellularia californica (California Bay-laurel) [Cottonwoods, sycamores, and willows are indicative of creeks; other trees may benefit from proximity to creeks or from persistent soil moisture due to other natural sources.] SHRUBS Cornus californica (Creek Dogwood) C. stolonifera Heteromeles arbutifolia (Toyon, California Holly) Myrica california (Bayberry, California Wax Myrtle) Rhamnus California (Coffeeberry) Ribes speciosum (Fuchsia-flowered Gooseberry) Rosa californica (Wild Rose) Rubus ursinus (California Blackberry) Rubus vitifolius (California Blackberry) Salix spp. (willows) Sambucus caerulea mexicana (Elderberry) Solanum douglasii (Black Nightshade) [Willows are indicative of creeks; other shrubs may benefit from proximity to creeks or from persistent soil moisture due to other natural sources.] HERBS Apocynum cannabinum (Dogbane) Carex spp. (sedges) Epilobium spp. (willow herbs) Equisetum spp. (horsetails) Juncus spp. (tules) Mimulus gutatus (Monkeyflower) Polygonum coccineum Selaginella spp. (club mosses) Typha spp. (cattails) Urtica spp. (nettles) [The listed herbs may also be indicative of ponds, marshes, springs, and seeps.] MEETING AGENDA DATE 7-45-9e-ITEM #1._.. 1911",WA 1,111 Date: July 23, 1996 To: City Council RECEIVED From: John Dunn, City Administrative OfficeQG JUL 13 1996 CITY CLERK Prepared by: . Neil Havlik, Natural Resources Manager. fi Subject: Long-Term Creek Maintenance Program ------------— -------------------------- City staff are considering a full review of the matter of long-term maintenance of creeks within the City limits. This matter has been brought into focus recently due to (1) the requirement by the Corps of Engineers for a comprehensive study of creek environments, (2) the establishment of the Natural Resources Management Program, (3) recent controversy involving the City's annual creek maintenance program activities, (4) increased costs of that maintenance program, and (5) long-term activities involving encampments along San Luis Obispo Creek and other creeks in the City. We plan to utilize the Corps' required "404" study to accomplish this review. The Corps is requiring the City to undertake an analysis of San Luis Obispo Creek, its major tributaries, and the upper watershed, in order to develop the most environmentally acceptable means of providing flood protection and other community needs along the creeks. We intend to utilize this vehicle to begin the natural resources inventory anticipated in the 1995-97 financial plan. The study will consider in-stream and streamside habitat quality, assess conditions in the upper watershed, and identify issues, constraints, and opportunities for appropriate management of the community's riparian environments. We look forward to this opportunity and invite Council members' comments on the concept. COUNCIL CDD DIR CKCAO O FIN DIR OOXCAO ❑ FIRE CHIEF QlTTORNEY ❑ PW DIR WZLERK)OFUG ❑ POLICE CHF . ❑ MGMT TEAM p REC DIR ❑ C READ FILE p UTIL DIR �'- -- Q PERS DIR i e &-,6NCIL M-M50 DIR NG a G AGENDA EI-CAO ❑ FIN DIR Q-ACAO ❑ FIRE CHIEF ; I,��N RESTAUila n� A MMI. ,IFT SHi)I i,9AF Tr G ❑ POLICE CHF MGMT TEAM ❑ REC DIR ❑ C R LE ❑ UTIL DIR i ❑� ❑ PERS DIR MEMORANDUM To: Dodie Williams From: Bob Davis — Date: July 16, 1996 Subject: Creek Setback Ordinance Amendment to Zoning Ordinance 17.16.025 Creek Setback E.3. Larger Setbacks I' would appreciate your consideration of this change to the proposed ordinance. Insert "in areas annexed after July 1, 1996" before the first I . comma of the first sentence. Since all development except R-1 requires at least an ARC approval, this section, unless amended, puts the entire issue of creek setbacks essentially back to the administrative process for all but R-1 projects. This section as drafted tells all property owners (except R-1): "Here is the best you can expect, but the Community Development Director is free to require more setback and further restrict its use." This lack of clear definition is what this ordinance is supposed to eliminate. It could be argued that the larger scale planning that will take place as property is annexed to the City may require the latitude of this section. However, with regard to individual lots within the current City Limits, the specific requirements of the ordinance are sufficient to protect and improve the creek habitat within the urban context and provides property owners with clear development standards. RECEIVED JUL 16 1996 ,. LLY&ERK � 2015 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California 23401 805/544.2040 SAN EUI_ RECEIVED I TING AGENDA DATE ffEM # JUL el 1996 July 19, 199 COUNCIL . ODIRCITY COUNCIL D Cow ❑ FIN DIR Mayor Allen Settle & City Council Members ErAO ❑ FIRE Cm City Hall. AfroRNEY 13 PW ORIG ❑ PO CIRC 990 Palm Street ❑ MGMT San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93401 ❑ MW0 RM 13 RECDIR TEAM AM ❑ urn DIR Gentlemen: Re: Creek Inspection & Clean-up ❑ PERS DIR v The creeks fill up more rapidly now, probably due to At4wl& E increased run-off from hillside development with huge houses, paved driveways, patios, etc. We think that 11100-year" rains, such as we had in 169 (when it rained for 30 days, day and night, with frequent cloudbursts,)and in 173 would result in disastrous flooding. There does not seem to be any ongoing, organized, system- atic inspection or clean-up of the creeks, and we have to wait until a heavy storm is almost upon us to have a crew come out to the neighborhoods. Then we are met with long explanations why the work has not been done or cannot be done, such as "We only have 4 people" or "The crane is broke", or "CMC can 't furnish workers and the City has no funds. " The creek near us is fed through 3 culverts leading under- neath Broad Street. One culvert is filling up with rubble and is almost covered with dense vegetation. A portion of the north bank is protected by a pile of sandbag/riprap, and the bags are rotting and digintegrating into the stream. We get much pile-up at the openings of the culverts, including large tree stumps and long, wide timbers which quickly form a blockage. Periodic inspec= tions might even pinpoint some of the culprits who use the creek in this way. We fear that the City could end up with a .class action suit filed by irate property owners (including some business people) if we experience severe flooding again. From the attached clipping it appears that the City can find funds for Chamber of Commerce/tourist-attracting pRojects (including 3 large parking structures) , but no money for vitally needed services affecting property and, possibly, lives of taxpaying residents. HELP! Sin/cnepr_ ely, Helen M.Alexander, 82 Broad, SLO i O� El d s `..r � _ �� Cha erot e t s iman, 85-B , El �• ...-• ,5 w road SLO ;sr. yFECCOadd " x "OOo o..:: p. 0 `C ! >QQEdw `dam . ' 008 �v� cis •���p+.V G.p •d.Gi sem- t6 .m+ cF mwCJ oyL .ms .nb-y.CC ai CD �9d�oFe�FoeE' a "v0Y,co.c, , an co o...._ 0 0 'EYING AGENDA - DATE ITEM #.�._ G�tY &umnl- MEM'3ep5'r 5 CEIVE® it, 5 �i5 .. ,lyy6 158CS�STR�S A� CiIT��F �AN �' Pd JUj 2 c ( � GITA f©f,CkT �(QO PAI-M � T jw I.u��ecsPo f�t43f lj- f,.t.1 i5 QB ISf� G1 q3p(- ,V4dF COUNoILI r4 �J�10^.�JrDSCC!%bi2K- (qqg C UNCIL DD DIR 0 FIN DIR E!rjAO '0 FIRE CHIS SU GC = GL�I�cNG �tt2� M-�CXMMP.NT3 .4AD lz� ❑ PW DIR B CLERKIORIG ❑ POLICE C ❑ MGMT TEAM ❑ REC DIR O C READ FILE ❑ UTIL DIR L�MBVZ5 ❑ PERS DIF Tom. a4warwr boyr-r (9;:� Tar,-_ 7su fits I�ZJAAIA)1�b 60'M& vUC;--DF�'CV'9g. R,l{�I�lk� VF�T�rOC9 �iM��Y�. 1�t95r(��Ul�IGL.l�1��ie,c&�J —_-- V'��ATfDrN �CtS�iu:�F-112 Mj5"T oA% DI`9I-5:r A&XC--(OO �-l>�4lZtl9�A�_�3NC> X 4S�- y tyrto.J l5 S IG�L iCAlC9�� 9h`1MArcK12��.f#Ub`1 1ti?D2u Ci Cs UZ rT-if r, P, ArO- M.MOP, 69E6K5 TF-fF�2 tn/l ym� �vs-�:3-- IREM clout, ) 6E CDM51 � mita9A, P�- E �L2� LtCl.SY � k9H-F-U )rU 2r::ALj'W AU, 624EK5 A2 ©I.�1CRLL`�SIC�,NI lC l4'�r--- F.<SP tPr�.L`JSi�c 1.Ft5. 60t-CLQ- XL 2-LPrA) vnwj-�M_ filoYQF- T1.5M W 6k-UF0W[A-khqU VtjmiUA-rtioN0.or-: TRY�� Vc0Ab9 15 A T7Z- it�`� sc-t�l,�r-fi r t-Ffl v� +-F Yo F-OC��Tj , 45.T-RE5:F—kQ-09h-S-. WERE rlT TRP, Lei 7 TFf rl� Zl9ts�Y f-l-iMI MA i� �PorvLZL-� �� 1 AC �Cx(9 Si-(B�A��V� 6iDL�6cCAL. U5[.l�S K�tpd� uC?_TFf� cl uzrzl%)07 .DRAi✓T (9 Expv t,e 7`-�t :E:xl5� T-te re r.s PrL1--ifpAr _-- I:ASiLY pavi17- Fm MDiu- 9TIM4>6.iCA",'! PdblQUltM 35 "09.6 - 2 svnoac� CS�loij A L��'Olfj n CrwP-F- C[Tte Ag,s, A1,T 0C•6H prr,-�atc t, 5p,r3A66<5 of 35 "APJb .Sd "AP-P,ie�Qurr�D 10 6P/\.4,r- Wc5T-Ai-)CF,s 6ocr1om..E.2. b.)T -Mrf� rev 5,19c�s � G-[ &P-, P, AALT� T7+PrT' T� >rAFF F C..� z2 >wd�G� 61-fCiE> om �i� 3 IIJ 71GE5tO GR EK5�MEMT5 uqoul,t> BE 5uF�jCCr 7o 3.5- FwT.Sr,-MAC&) AO VIMUAU5r"',f)OA-W— uMu. -b t-fA WrJJE� cs At t..i+L6 .Mpr..�a—prtzsL.t- 5r[t1. gxtsTs , � Plm '5 FF 5TAT7W-7 � �IBI- To PRoU[t>r- A 58'SAc. t�-F�crLr .�rc ikt a-5 J i- L4e AIZL J,,� AMb 'TNS- PP-0JrCr D.E51::�V P26CEZ -t-ft �+X -rO TAKF, nAcr--. TF-:v {r Rr--MAiM5.TrW- �MWY MRJOZ R.CT PWJr� A5 /VJ&% 2ATL-095_-, 5f 1RC- Pt-SNS, br-lJ f-:�4z�E�Ur Pt.Av.D57 W,Wb D[V 15OAD U c t-5 P�2GHlT�GTc,1l2AL. R1rV► � �C.) Bl✓ll�, Pr LLOGl9 �1J8C9Prv?` -- zc TO 60t-rM "f H rut[t�tM(,e1./t--C�ie2Di��rvc�. 5�= 4941L.E -sau, 14AVii6 /oc FA [12&A3b R SD�PrB1- 5 Ft&9b1 15pFF8 -j9Y" FfaDtvt -rte OME -fes GGt22PNT p2RFT �f�P[A9�N�G L1112 51. --.. 1,1.7 k�fi.Gl-f_ l5. �AS(C•AcG-L.`� �[�12DI1.`-f R. CF�Il25�.CJ,�t`�1�4�' GvE-fQ 1.091 JAL- ---- tw>tc T-F- Pr t F55r2 S�Tmcox 15 wr R 54:^-N 1 r-1 C!{A9T- lMPftG7- - '1V FP r, "r&fF, FIMN&G OJgr tp6-TD MbUlMigt IMPS 7D .5-,,MtG Oe-60U-RC 5 u9ATI�p-4upryj 7v1 4Nb rz[PA,Pj141 1-fABlrA7 11JCWD1k�6 c5pb27-6A LTlr.5 etz, u9t4.bk4j�r dA3i-rA-TAOM, �EjJ� .PCN MDV J1�tEJl$�! <G.�. d- �.), ORM-rVP�P- �M[A)tA41-'ar, " SNS ! 3 OA61�b &MK 5 � &P b[AAAJfr,--Trfr-, MA-tN 9ag5OA7 Xt - Pa tW(KZ7 TRIS 6 `Tv pmytcr Tiff t3�W,-5- 1Nf;oinA.E�> T MAt MOrBE. 3 .VOTP,5--0A-l7TE 66WCIL Fr#L Pr C-x 33b FCoL4�6 tCA4� t 8A5E4b eX>lA)ik�7 At-Z eC9f,, ;5j+t Ub A PT 5PMk-nbk]6 W:;:55 MR, l atL:abl I rE AMb ITfEEiK CCK R*,bITAT. i CW bR9y�-e SAY TAT IF_AW—I Cil.-6WJW--- jl�f D C t7r? J u2151) LC71 WlU5. ACE-Pr vUCK 1.060 65ft- 6-.P-..--.- wt4biwr-i5Akib-- -rkfLg kAB t rRT7 JOF- A 2E- Bc. eUl Z OM4-0--T HE:- C N65-F-T-MAWTl- A) E3LOPIV1�5iTt' L5 Nr - F 55iBEE 11�9IZ "(fes SF�7/�95)BdL� � L�GPrL- PrC,Ct"t4-E21Ti�S. (tfE. �t-TC�12 l5 CT EL-F �'CA�-�'�'rBL�T.. 5i&YC� MAt9c( POG-ITICIA 95 ASMAfZ.D I, 5J5TA-f tt&jb p� Cd*TROJ� Pf&lb !�P-.r-- k4O tel,-691^ h\lb-rO t774-- 4AT- �DC� -L-. C.CI19.Tja%.- Nt(,tS� 60-O t`t R- tT jT2E5 PVAJ5 d3 i 9 7Y Z FA55 6Zb I,�.�L., �5 � P&�T�T GI�IL�L.I��.f��l9b.'ft-fLl1�G-EftBt_7ptT�TN� l -r4� Kwr C�u�x,i i s Iny.1 m� -z m T�E 3 m &K p -AU�6 b15a&5SF� l+ JTi4 - _._ Mf JOA, 1551 tE5. -,TtE 6�c- . :56nb1- CW X4511-`r CDlLIZ_C�"_-. . .7;E6F-, F©u v NV. op bE.P, t/i AE:5pg,--T Tc) -Mr-- GU212EA -r�b2R-FT -- a -�PKK 10 17..01k ft2 gtPAr<jPrk Tr..66AL_ 4A5 Ai. OA"C5 - - - B� 'rD P&Tt` �cV t Hf( CrztJr,- G 6DR.n►hD2 A-KD iTF k)h77VF- PUPAQW )tn>iTdkT-- Pwi,- HAljp, Tr:6rl Fub Tt-Y A9F- aAZW-v Age c HArlk'6 -1-(D PWVI. FE A- SETBACK. FWAA tit M- (OATtVr- oWM5A -1 T� U�"�tD1J-7�t°cT�cI�5T5 6f�9 TH�i2 SITS, c�t�u:��9�rZ_� uN� 17• -3�-Z T14W V9�a -b F-AVE TD,bo-�n4E I, WTTEP . ON T 74F-6T�.P- tib cT t5 t&T JOST-INE-t Ju,57"-M T-4r 5aBPvG< FwM Az W. 5( (?,PAP- AIJ Pl--)W13 014 101 T`��t GPcLZ.`J rfi TrFP-ft2 PzCTS IfJ A. S tFfW (A-5 -ri4r ur�f��f0cZs '' ti9A�vE f2LPAv�A� V' r ,u Gisr�,51Am tiRrTv: oPrWAsft s &-T t kM ou-1prZ ��CAEZX C J�g� - _- -�SYIVQtU`fiVlD(.►-5 •r� 2rPP��A7.fi9R,�t1Y�R� oJ� �t�I�P_lR��il�re�. AlZa NJ IAS-P0RTH0T' PAbzr&F T� 2t PAM AU .-- �t2 t�� tw► �t=_ > �T .�xcT j�D-&90r 4AVE-7ff9lk tAv- Pr P� /1f�1�9F�J1 GC9A�i Sr ePpL-� Aff,,D.b _kk5rOLA 5 - r-tr:�D P6 21 PMA&). ft-ft.. C�, Pe L4 190T :rU L5Ys. V. L R6L -Alub AU> DAV t-b J. k�-11- VMTEL IN TFWt f-EM,< CA- 14FORMIA Cwt Mt,Uu t T`C_ t ti-..CPd,t ro W 1,A A-5 T -'�D1- SDAvt E-.6F..-. 7t 5# ,I=S 8F Tlfr5 CD1l9�C�.(OU5 G�Ml�2GlJU f TIES.BF�Ii ...._ . AMD ArzoU)J-b out . �cC9lU `T�fLs� CD�fTtsGl6G(5 smcie5- tjuc"C.DF 5Hatj55 imPog"mr _'t&., carE 2 EF �IPk��to� CoeRtA9J2 its �au� 60reo71 82[,4514,-ByYs � C_ 9u't'tfu5� ffk �t2b�P� 5(:Y&A 245A7_ LEhTREQ,OA!<7 b6tCU<&Ut4r-AT2 ftN� 51%VE2AL,DYH�-1�-•.-.. -T� L 54W.8,5 ftrl THE. octnp-z C zai< Cc�2121DO2 I�R.E F�I.�CD°r11-Y IA4pc ,TANT`A5 Tttt-�v t-fr:w :5tfADE AND 6ML 7 -tr i59t j- AA11> PUP OF _ .._..Tt#E- 6Lq--Z F-i f AJZJ PW AC/VIF- / b F-V Af t>JZTt0A9 &D... . �"IZFtIl25f�R�t'Tt BF ATM Dt c2t&rg. PWU6 ft"S AND CN 5F-VF4M tWLJG RT5 CA" K-MP rHP- tXt> 4z- P-1 PPrgJ A!) v'E6f TAT70M MW 5 A�'fn PPCco,ep.ttok ,5t f�El,�BS PcyS Pte/c.bE cturLCAI: PWD 4AAI> aVEZ-FD26WUMb Gt9r,J„�l.�t;� �.F�1�5. /�5 �B1TS� jzDD.�V7'��SiV�1-K�S� U�ieD57 - �vt�}tt t�Cl`95C� SiftpM�� ASD 606uNb BIR16 f45 l�i�4v� S�PrR�6f�5� C�tLr�oRit�1A- ��� �c.�ou5-5�� Tu9tf�S1 5 l�r:5. .IAJ V_PrtzjA 3Z-�D tEF- our..- _-... -- - - �� 7D AU�OVtPrTY- �PLP5'6 rNc�s xcrH4-04;-ro �Vt� S�BftUGS - 5r--V E)A-GK5 ffiRr-- FRaVIDED FOCM NPrt'VF- S4-57477-t T� -� r_- -71-tM cX,cTr::Z f1Y E 7T-T- G2��G C)2 Zt-l�C27..L-- -rPLLCWlX;/g ,;o2.Dtl6 M)Z 17-04-. 34t2- lJfIWJPrA) U E ITIDA7(A I): ptQPrI'2.1AA) v15GirATVAl hM 7-H&6.C-- IJA=f 71,F, dAeB5r-:544P4405r. AA,°D TRr:FS r;&P+I C� tl A7—ZAr—oPr1.L5ro'—AS5C0 hM —4617N -5rrrM _. SrD,- �vt��M� .5Wco v OM °rr- G(Ttrs l�i�rry �i tuA Va&-F.-r-AT-bA.) �S Pru_ mTREE,e A9m-1 VF. srfTZC 5 i eb AAE Ar _-...Ae4k5 r pPrf r 1 N-Tfff�-CR -EW CaRJ23POA /-S -bE lFIA9! D QN FA6E Dom,-2 DF-TtS &Pr--N 15�A�.F19A4WTp#gN0 Fx15 7rA r LZA5T PAP�r�� ui�R42, Puy/Jr5 0A� T1+t^ /JftTTVF- A PA w AN Vr�GET70C77W wE CAXD TT+W. S.r:�F,ri Al-DA9 A06-t�,Z r uJDP2 17-16,o2-6� !N Som E CA5ES G. M�suampwr 457F: 6z�c :5 rB/Ucs,*Ma s,m�-sACX Gc,�l cl_b �� Ntl: SGCde =D FP_CM TTf;p dtTk�p, ;QF- 6F NA�IV�Sti�uBS u t e.R f'f.A&AT5 DN T74L !M RZ&-.601 i6N 6F 7?tr 5-r co i o6 t CAL. AVAU.fF, 74jt�5 a.CYE,-AsAT7 VE. S)fPU� ft�vE FOR, G -rpl< 2r PA-p-)R/V tit AitUM 17ce of pl-A-AlT5 AA9D AA9 t AAA L5, CLQ O ,5EMTW CE TD 2EAb "XLH Tt-SLS. TiTL� ��5 1�-��GUIz� ft .2�1�-�M�A91'�^t�-c�cCruR�� Wce Oatf-l25Y RPV rVVZE pts A MEO SrPaC414Tv RRoVI bE 7RF- GMK 5P�126ACK T *T- (5 PXV�UVZa FD)?,R MW 2�w1� sr�" y�/?b Srh41.L � P��tC�b o�uE i✓�v"�,et mor or OZEEK saBacc PRO_Vtba BYruF- gEP - � cit9 Pd)PLTZON TD.�t#1-5PT.SAtJC 6r--Tftr--. __.. BST)-f 0RAL.. PWD oZTRA)-T�WaXrO (Q foj) 6F mok5 wrz '7- a5 Cxe 5gf XW-rA2Fr65 R . -..1 - or-TRr-- DQpr-r SR-to)&MCzf A5 (T t5 iluCOAJ.5(5 71-P.Mr vi ITH-Tff-L_ A-ND V311 2- PcU- I,-9 l-0R 7"tft5 (,, 5-TPAQ-AAAI IMLZM 5ETBACK-. THE FIKNUG. CDU-LD BE NtADr-- 1} Fo I R PrAlb PEA0 VW1-- pp�Dj�5GT..C.ESC;f1.D I(9CTl-faGCT-- � TNS L_E55-Tlft�/U- m w imam S CK t,UW�pP2TUA9�t�EL� t�4-�Gt9�D � �iG. � 1. ).He�RE,7 cF TR 5- l Pr-,Rr 15T5, A"T l T-ASK 'ae-CZUMQt,C wtPr:;M.- y _ z2- F fsSuR .-lamFP vtiD TFflSCCIoQ -qtr- 5TPa::4- iAP�D 5-F-0$ACK oNr F3Z5T- FM.FVER-fr(:YNE F6up-t, -7a GA-a) BAUC Au- o/Z A5 MUCH (S F TF+r-- C 1< 50T$AGG P6 X55 i}3 Ie -M.P- ctu _ . �T &N_ b QT fr-J6 MPVEg-7 t�T Tff�- i rugocer�b Br e TYs IIJMT_ T5. tekloPlE. Mcr� R c PA91AM TZEES IN f5usi+l�-Tt- Cox Im Fiacr,- civ Tt�E kb Cum.uCAs 6 Nsto.THP -TTf6 lvajlj- ese. PrS- .- u t��-ro� 5>�5 � K ��Acic.Rv�. .��Nrl►ncc�tc---- - - -- �;�'���5 P�SiCAL. .TC�'DF 8An9�1 12[PA��Pt'll5 OUT,159��o�zs r-at.)AI,_->Abs of A - _ . . .- � Rte. r- T- t P� T -8ruA6 lGWP�E-D W. M N t &/QtM 1 1�6.6�ksl om PARR6ZAPk G.. 4F T{ft5 6RDi/l�>tt/�9G�� agi4tCI4. (5 [1�9y,E x9�C9. BAcK �2D c�Pj7�C, I Wa-r-Fo 2E)T BP. (XG&/s'i5TUAiruo ITH W.P, O� SPAf� 1 I A5K TFfi4 f"TItF- UGll, 0.055 CUT GC90 2D ?RE�S /! -�b QAgA6P-PcPI4 C • IIU Tffr-�Np,?CT m m6r CZ, ,Z . CPPB t = IN T+[5 PVIP6RARit I h5K-r-FiPT 774F— 67-C C-FEAi�O RJA T' VE P-I PftPJNJ Vr--6rMTW 4 Tp' :57� 51 MP4-`e 4 PPtPAAV �� �t PFS!fl� U'F�"R'l�. ���E}�N`� Q�l. f��� I l.�N� !Z• 04�3�f�� u9HlC+ L �fP-Vr- D1N. IT-66 WA-Y IT-I5 ccs-Mhr R-�L 91PAR-tRU M�'VATTOUTA-f l HfkvE 7-&-rT BF, DPV�D UU. 17,04-. 3�f ,X9 &90V. OF -P-EmoVJED--!N-77fE--- -. �GlI�'Ft�J2ME�t2�r RNtrvt�t Pci��� ��� -U'�.1t2l�5��/zd�. V 6E=q t`fEN # I/U 7F+i5_.5riCrZC/0. 612 r_ gE:CaNth T tom' - T+t� E-oUovD cK)G 6P, &b-bP> u 1 - �1-f15 �ECrLE�V /1 7ft H" E:- PSA ..5LCT^tOAI.5�.T 'r D�"�titr�D �T�� �n�MGc.n>•�`� 1��EI�Ptit�.9T- p,r��r�a,e 1RV TD Hutitort,�5 w L-1>w-Ff. aa-r fFLSQ- ;bTp-? tAiED .\,3 BE. AIoK!cX. Y2 MPrY 13t-- 21:�MD1/� 60MPARA.5j, tcscl bL-1t _ U� c ti._�• _ —i#15 �ti,�,�s�5_ f?-' � RtC-,FtT � 9L� L CA!, Prl).>(TtCA).OF A)AF VE 12 C.PlkielAQ .ft AW'1r5 Pry Pb t5nd2&1K fM}D.sift i> NE1TI„t;�Gl�t fiG�( AV �f!(�t-� 1�P�°rizlEt2RN� ll.Dk1 ifA�i`�YT UA I.1��,TD Tff�. C�TSS I�f�Civ�. J�tpf�2l�iV ���z�' tv �,[5T� GC9f-I-1l.I= �L.LdGc�t� I�Pi�I``� OGC9R9� Ttf� 2(��TTp.. Rt�jvoVt- 7 ;M a)U&-tj�T�rLoA) a9LTFJ TIfE Gam, IF TRECtIJAVI (Z-ti ACAS TQM YO L-r4 tJPcTtUF--PtAkn5.OF. 60AARARP &F F-.COIF Neu L SVP- TAT Pitts- &IzAa-5 AiU.b W GUR -MA96 DLOAYv TRP-- 6tMK �1%TS�GC DWAMO-E }f r2tAUG PP.0(- Sl Tw TRE- SPW 5f PaX.� OAJ PP6f: Z9 UAJPE z.b.. tAvAtcATZ5 - - WT- TRjWbk&t4 Ptt0P"r M) OF- Tf+ts 6RZEK-0IFbl/,AAM 7 Fr- . u9oUj-t> `` PwMOTY.. 9,LiABIl�rAT&V�1 PVYD. PX5tolzAVOID 6P f2-[PAf 4A-M VrC-EVV�i ©K CRF-r--K G©Rt2t �zS_7 Ef ftoPT-ZoU 61:-' pr G ©RDtll)trA. E.. // Tog G-TY' otk5. Aja1f J�Cn9F. TR6 Lo LT-f- TEfF, C EEK 5iFr'BA6K &tzb4GVJ6F— 60b-THE_. P-z5U J T W C14- BF, 6UR- CPZ� 6011_L..- 5TIL..13E_56a I nE.Th---. P-j PA-P-I )\) V'C�ET-A 17oA) l �V 1. GI�.LL f-[ CD�l4.TZL�7l d�----- . �6 (�Sr- T7f15 OPtTCA-) - fQPA-RJRiCI - Ct-r-er". M,Y �JE�10 NatOHMP Per 16731.4--MaA Iry TFfE-(Z)P-ftPJAAI-- (f.�►.v ��lpt/lll`� S� l�tLlC�{ GF C'P f�2 TF-f15 �.5��.._._-. a2Tt fA-r'? IT fJOW IMK5--WKP-.A.-Jtc6t4��I MWtCLqZEb PAeK7 C-C.y tTf:-t ND G2caU1�9�.-�v�D�TtttG�s�f2u8 coves A�9D GZ3t11�S l5 A 0tGF ljF 6kEDP 1�9D_� T.hD-P,CG1—t ; f3U� Eft -- ft5icI�P tkAlb 66Y" 1D 6CEfDEjJMt;:569 9,(.kt�s FWM 7Zh5 Ccr_Y bol- ftT 4P. 5tfcZt).b W 75 PrZ TrnCf P l PA-PJPrlQ 44-13 iTA-T AIJI) GC9F`�f -�11z NtuST EfP c�.�(R G�Tf �S PlOTr:::G?" 7ff E- F.jzt46ccA , Viqu c.EOFOUZ PuMPUAlui -E-5(WuftC9 allVDF. P�.JOM tG t9 t`rS eY 1/110 P��R�YU s)t�ce�lny ustaM` Df,2 L% S, . 5 5 BYIMM IAY�I-�P�GII� fk A(PftfJAU M61TPrYaU P�v�GTIDN �lu� �'c�2ATCDN o�tn��n�c�.