HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/20/1997, C-4 - SENIOR CENTER PARKING jcouncil o, y4-
acEnaa Repout Z/
CITY OF SAN LUIS 0 B I S P 0
FROM Mike McCluskey, Director of Public works7't
Prepared By: Keith Opalewski, Parldng Manager
SUBJECT: Senior Center Parking
CAO RECOAMENDATTON
1) Install 2-hour time limit parking along the park side of 1400 Santa Rosa and 1000 Buchon
effective July 1, 1997. 2)Install 3-hour parking meters along the park side of 1000 Pismo effective
January 1, 1998. 3) Approve $5,000 from parking fund for meter installation. 4) Encourage
Seniors to begin negotiations with Ride-On for shuttle service from Santa Rosa Park.
DISCUSSION
The Senior Center is a multi-purpose facility that selves senior citizens for a variety of social events
and activities. There is no on-site parking for patrons of the facility and the adjoining public Streets
are open parking for Seniors, park users, and nearby residents and businesses, as well as overflow
parking from downtown businesses. Because of the impacted parking in the vicinity of the Senior
Center, coupled with the limited ability of some Center users to walk long distances, staff has been
approached by representatives of American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) and the Senior
Center for possible solutions to improve the current parking situation near the Senior Center. As a
result, staff conducted an analysis of various options (Attachment 1) to address the problem which
are briefly discussed as follows:
Options for Parking Relief:
A. New Facility
A new senior facility could be built with ample on-site or nearby parking. I..easing an existing
facility with sufficient parldng is also another possibility to resolve the parking concerns. Both of
these approaches have financial and logistical problems which may not be easily resolved in a
timely fashion. However, replacing the current facility could be pursued as a long range option for
the City if the Council wishes to establish this as a goal.
B. Expanded Parking
A new parking lot could be constructed within the boundaries of Mitchell Park. Because of its
physical layout, the effect to the area(i.e., reduction of neighborhood park land) and on other park
users, staff does not recommend this option.
may/
Council Agenda Peport--Senior Center parldng
Page 2
Parking_ ement
The existing parking around Santa Rosa Park could be managed differently to fine up parking
spaces. By creating more turnover of the parking spaces around the perimeter of the park, facility
users could have a better opportunity to find parking closer to the Center. There are two primary
ways to induce turnover of the spaces; metered or time limit parking. Parking meters offer the best
method for contvlled parking of the on-street spaces, but are more costly to install. Time limit
parking is another way to create more turnover of the spaces, which is less expensive to install, but
is more labor intensive to enforce.
Parldng_Meters
The issue of installing parking meters around the park perimeter has been discussed with
Senior representatives. In fact, they originally proposed installing 4-hour meters at a
reduced rate of.25 cents per hour. This time limit would meet their needs of 3-4 hours
normally required for patrons, and the lower rate was proposed in order to reduce the
impact of now having to pay for additional parking. Unfortunately, both of these proposals
require changes to the Municipal Code, because the current parking meter district ends
along Pismo Street and parking meter rates are pre-set at 5-year intervals. An alternative
option would be to set meters at the current lower rate of 40 cents per hour along the park
side of Pismo Street(inside the parking meter district and thus no Code change required).
Time Limit Parking
Another option is to utilize time limit parking around all or a portion of the park perimeter.
This would require only time limit signs to be installed along the designated streets
adjacent to the park Although time limit enforcement does require more staff time, the
Mitchell Park area is adjacent to an existing 2-hour zone on Santa Rosa Street:, therefore the
impact on enforcement personnel would be nominal since they already are in the immediate
area. However, any time limit parking beyond 2-hours would require a Mrmicipal Code
change.
Shuttle Service
Establishing a shuttle service from Santa Rosa Park to the Senior Center is very plausible and
would be w1atively easy to implement Seniors would park for free at Santa Rosa Park and be
shuttled to the Senior Canter. The service would be Fmided by Ride-On Transportation, The
Park and parking lot is city-owned so there are no costs associated with the pick up and drop off
site. A fixed schedule(e g., 9am for pick-up and 1pm return trip) could be established to meet the
needs of seniors. The fixed schedule cost is proposed to be a flat rate per trip (approximately $20)
which could be shared among the users. The range per individual user could run between $0.75 to
$1.50 per trip. Any deviations from the fixed schedule could be supplemented by Ride-On,s hop
program which offers door-to-door service both ways. The door-to-door hop program cost (12
rides for $20) would be borne by the individual user. This approach would result in a convenient
Park and ridelshuttle service for a very nominal cost to the users. This would result in less parking
congestion in the Senior Center area and make better use of the parking lot at Santa Rosa Park.
Council Agenda Report-Senior Center parldng
Page 3
Given the issues of: existing site limitations; present Municipal Code restrictions; the present multi-
purpose use of the parldng spaces around the park and the issue of controlled parking; staff
recommends a two phased approach to addressing this issue. Phase one (July 1, 1997) would
install a 2-hour time limit on Santa Rosa and Buchon streets with open parlang maintained on
Pismo and Osos Streets. (see Exhibit A). In staffs opinion this would provide both short-term and
long-term parking fora users of the park. Phase two (January 1998) would install meters along
Pismo Street set at a maximum of three hours at the new rate scheduled for implementation by the
Municipal Code for January 1, 1998, which is 50 cents per hour. Sarna Rosa and Buchon Streets
would retain the 2-hour open Darling limitations. If after 6 months of usage it is determined that
the meters and/or the time limits need to be expanded or changed beyond the authorization of the
existing Municipal Code, staff would at that time return with a recommendation for the appropriate
Municipal Code changes. This approach allows relatively low cost options to be quickly
implemented in order to evaluate the success of the program before more costly alternatives are
pursued. Finally, staff would encourage Senior leaders to contact Ride-On and pursue the shuttle
program for its members benefit.
CONCURRENCES
A survey (see Attachment 2, pg. 18) conducted as part of a student project which looked into the
parking issue revealed that the preference of Senior members is to not install parking meters as
recommended. Also, based upon this survey, there appears to be some support for expanding
parking within the park boundaries. However, as previously mentioned, given the need to "find"
more convement parting for Center users it is staff s conclusion that the more cost-effective and
efficient approach as recommended, is to improve the management of nearby on-street parldng
spaces together with the use of alternative transportation services. The Parks and Recreation
Department also concurs that building a parldng lot inside Mitchell Park is not the best use of City
park land and supports the concept of using the services of Ride-On in conjunction with the Santa
Rosa Park parldng lot and door-to-door service.
FISCAL IWACT
Implementing the Phased approach to time limit and metered parking is low cost as compared to
Other options (Exhibit B). Time limit signs could be installed for approximately $600 and the 15
meters along Pismo Street would cost approximately $5,000 for electronic mechanisms and
housings. The concept of converting to electronic meters have been included as part of the
proposed 1997-99 Financial Plan, but does not include the additional monies that would be needed
to expand electronic meters near Mitchell Park. Thus, staff is requesting the approval of the
necessary funds to install the meters and housings. The shuttle service would run $40 a day ($200
week and$800 per month) to operate through user fees. No cost for the use of Santa Rosa park.
ALTERNATIVES
The recommendations for parking management could be adjusted to include more or less time limit
Council Agenda Report—Senior Center parlang
Page 4
and/or metered parking. The staff recommendation represents a low cost approach to assess the
parking situation, which is the more immediate concern of the Senior Center members. As noted
in (Exhibit B) there are other more costly alternatives. A new parking lot would run in the $25-
35,000 range depending upon the size, and a replacement facility could run in the neighborhood
of $750,000 to a million, depending upon the size and location. A contract shuttle service and
leased park and ride lot is also a costly option to implement without first testing the market.
Therefore, because of the prohibitive costs and logistical problems associated with these
alternatives, staff does not recommend any further action at this time. However, other
enhancements, such as expanded Ride-On shuttle hours or even transit service, could also be part
of the overall approach to the transportation needs of Seniors, which may warrant further
consideration if the demand for expanded services is documented after the 6-month evaluation
period.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit A Parking map for meters and time limit
Exhibit B Cost summary of parking alternatives
Attachment 1 Staff report for Senior Center parking
COUNCIL READING FILE
Attachment 2 Student Report on Senior Center parking
PROPOSED METER & TIME LIMIT LOCATION
Santa Rosa Street
########
V V
* Senior Center
* c #
* #
* #
* #
*
*
* c #
ismo SU Be c #
Bu h Stre
* #
* #
* #
* #
* #
* #
*
OPEN PARKING
Osos Street
� I
U
# 2-Hr Time Limit(7/1/97)
* 3-Hr Meters (1/1/98)
Exhibit A
c-y�
SENIOR CENTER PARKING ALTERNATIVES
ALTERNATIVE
Park&Ride Lot Lease 40-60 spaces $1,000-1500 month General Fund
Shuttle(contract) 50-200 trips $2,0004,000 month General Fund
Land Lease 20-40 spaces $50041000 month General Fund
Land Purchase 20-40 spaces $100K-250,000 General Fund
Lot Construction 20 spaces $25-30,000 General Fund
Lot Construction 30 spaces $30-35,000 General Fund
New Facility-Build 2000-102000 sq ft $200K-1,000,000 General Fund
New Facility-Lease 2000-10,000 sq ft $3-15,000 month General Fund
Exhibit B
C-y to
AffMORIZA>DUD
April 3 , 1997
To: Nike McCluskey,Director of Public Works
Al Cablay,Public Works Manager
From: Keith Opalewsk4 Parking Manager
Subj: Senior Center Parking Study
Background:
The Senior Center is a multi-purpose facility that serves approximately 170 senior
members for a variety of social events and activities. There is no on-site parking for
patrons of the facility and the adjoining public streets are open parking for Center and park
users as well as nearby residents and overflow parking from downtown businesses.
Because of the impacted parking situation in the immediate vicinity of the Center, and the
limited ability of some of the Center patrons to walk long distances, staff has been
approached by representatives of the AARP and Senior Center to help improve the current
parking situation.
Alternatives:
Possible solutions to the parking issue at the Senior Center fall into two primary
categories: find/create new parking in the vicinity of the Senior Center or relocate the
facility to a more suitable location. Each category will be discussed in more detail
outlining the pros and cons of the various options available to address the issue.
New Parking
Creating"new"parking can be achieved by a variety of means:
• construct a new parking lot inside Mitchell Park
• purchasellease land nearby for expanded parking
• establish a park and ride lot and shuttle.service
• enhance nearby on-street parking through improved management/efficiency
Parking Lot Construction
Pros—Constricting a new parking lot within the boundaries of Mitchell Park could
increase the number of available spaces(20-30)for Senior and park users. The new
spaces would be close to the Center and meet the long-term(3-4 hours)parking needs of
Attachment 1
-y-,/
Center users. The land is currently owned by the City which would reduce the overall
cost.
Cons—Park land would be used for parking vehicles,which could be significant
considering it is presently a small urban park Financing the construction through the use
of General Fund monies could adversely affect other city planned projects. It also
encourages additional vehicle trips via more accessible parking spaces and would be
difficult to enforce unless some form of restrictions are placed on the parking lot.
r .,... :
;.::N<:<><L 20 spaces -30K$25K
General Fund
30 spaces $30K-35K General Fund
Purchase/lease land
Pros—Obtaining land for a satellite parking lot would eliminate the need to impact park
land for expanded parking. Potentially could expand inventory depending upon the size of
the lot.
Cons—Potential for high acquisition costs if land is purchased outright Increased
construction costs if land must be cleared of buildings. Low probability of finding a
suitable site in the immediate vicinity(walling distance)of the current.Senior Center.
Creates ongoing fixed costs for cleaning and maintenance.
?rx'rrcx ` F $100K-250K , General Fund
,. ;�a�: >>{:��{ 20-40 aces
lease 20-40 paces $500-1000 month General Fund
Park and Ridelshuttle
Pros--A park and ride lot offers expanded parking without the cost of land acquisition.
Through the use of existing lots(e.g., Santa Rosa Park) or outlying city streets as staging
areas no land purchase or lease would be required. This option offers flexibility for pick-
up and drop-off points along with the potential for varied schedules.
Cons—Operating a shuttle is costly if owned by the City,but could be reduced if leased or
contracted with outside agency such as Ride-on. Funding source would have to be
established for on-going operations,which could impact other projects. It could adversely
impact park land parking and/or on-site street parking. There is a potential for low
ridership if location and schedule operation do not meet the needs of Center users.
spaces
$1,000-1500 month General Fund
shuttle contract 50-200 trips $2,000-4,000 month General Fund
Ride-On 50-200 tris $150-$800 month User fees
On-street ParkingManagement
Pros—Implementing controlled parking through parking meters or time limit parking
offers potential for turnover and increased efficiency of nearby spaces. Relatively low
cost to implement with a short time frame for installation. It also offers flexibility for
different scenarios to address both short and long-term parking for users of the parking
spaces. Increased revenue from meters and citations.
Cons—Requires users to pay for parking if meters are installed. Increased manpower to
enforce especially for time limit parking. Unpopular with the public and could adversely
impact nearby residential parking by forcing users into uncontrolled areas. Requires
ordinance change to expand parking meter zone and extend duration of time Emit
restrictions to(ally implement around perimeter of park
15-50 meters I $5-17 000 Parkim Fund
signs 10-30 signs $400-1200 Parking Fund
New Facility
Although constructing a new Senior Center or multi-purpose center with sufficient on-site
parking would meet the needs of local seniors and the general public, this approach
should be viewed as a long-term option which could take years to fully develop. Cost and
availability of appropriate land in the proper location would also be difficult obstacles to
overcome. An interim solution could be to lease a facility which could presently meet the
needs of the Seniors. However, lease and operating costs would need to be financed
along with finding the appropriate building,which is still a significant undertaking.
2000-10,000 s ft
$200K-1,000,000 General Fund
lease 2000-10,000 sq ft $3-15,000 month . General Fund
Possible Solution
The short-term solution for enhanced Senior Center parking is twofold: improve the
parking management of the nearby on-street spaces and expand use of alternative
transportation(transit, carpool and vanpool via Ride-on services). Inducing turnover of
the park perimeter spaces would provide the opportunity for Senior Center users to find a
more convenient parking space on a more frequent basis, but not guarantee it. This is a
short-term solution that could be implemented to"test"this approach to the problem.
Thereby, allowing some time before final changes are implemented. Full metering of all
park perimeter spaces would require Council action because the current parking meter
district(see attachment 1)only includes Pismo Street and not the 1400 blocks of Santa
Rosa and Osos Streets, nor any portion of Buchon.
Staff would recommend that a partial installation of meters at the current lower rate of 40
cents per hour be installed along the Pismo Street park perimeter as a trial program If
the 15 meters along the Pismo perimeter prove to be effective, and more metered parking
seems warranted, only then would we proceed to Council to expand the parking meter
zone. The issue of meter rates could be addressed at this time as well. Staff also
recommends a 3-hour time limit for these"trial"meters. This timeframe is less than the 4-
hour limit proposed by the Center, but it helps reduce the potential for downtown
employees to`Teed the meter" during their lunch hour. Staff further recommends the use
of electronic meters along this test block because they provide the flexibility of changing
rates and time limits without incurring additional costs that our current mechanical have.
Installing 15 electronic meters, housings, poles, and signs would cost approximately
$5,000. It should be noted that although representatives did propose installing parking
meters at a special rate,the survey conducted by the students indicates strong opposition
(Appendix C, pg. 18 student report, attachment 2)to the idea of installing meters to open
up more spaces. They did support the idea of creating a parking lot inside the park
Another option would be to post time limit parking along the remaining park perimeter
spaces on Santa Rosa,Buchon and Osos Streets. A three hour time limit would be ideal
because it would match the meters and provide for more turnover of these spaces as well.
However, creating an unmetered 3-hour time zone would require an ordinance change
because the current code only allows unmetered time limit parking for a maximum of two
hours(see Attachment 3). Lastly,we could try the time limit(2-hour) approach first
around the entire park, including Pismo, to assess the turnover and availability of parking
spaces for the Senior Center. Time limit signs could be installed for around $600.
Shuttle
In addition to the parking management changes, establishing a shuttle service from a local
park and ride lot could also help address the parking issue. Operating a shuttle service
would be costly if it was owned and/or leased by the City. However, discussions with
Ride-On have indicated that a flat rate per trip option could be implemented in conjunction
with a fixed schedule. Furthermore, the use of Santa Rosa Park parking lot as a staging
area for seniors would be an ideal situation. This no-cost location allows a direct route to
the Center at a predetermined time for pick-up and return trip. A schedule such as 9am
pick-up and a return trip at 1pm could handle between 12-24 seniors, depending upon the
size of vehicle used for the trip. If the demand warranted it, more than one vehicle could
be dispatched for this purpose. Preliminary discussion has indicated that this service could
be provided for approximately$20 per trip ($40 per day). This cost would be shared
among the users of the service, which could be under a dollar if sufficient people use the
shuttle. Furthermore,Ride-On offers a door-to-door service as well,which could be used
by individuals who cannot use the park option, or return a person to the parking lot earlier
than the fixed return trip time. The cost for this service would be the responsibility of the
individual user(12 rides for$20).
The shuttle option has many advantages because there is no overheard for the city to
operate a shuttle service, no cost for the parking lot, and it can be customized to meet the
needs of individuals as well as groups. Finally, this service could be implemented is a very
C- `I1D
short time and be in operation while the parking management changes are being ordered
and installed.
Attachments #1 Parking meter zone map
#2 Senior survey from student report
#3 Muni Code
PAREMG METER ZONE MAP
ZFIROO• � e
e
l
a
n
Is MOfNlnpr n
e e
E
e
w
t
k
t )E E ,
O
El El F El z •�
00
HEE
tLl
N
1 u,
E17 �
l♦ "° � c
♦ 09 mt coil oort oou ` oor[
D
217 3-9�
10.52.020-10.52.050
. The parking meter rate shall be thirty street upon which the meter is placed. Each
L...,ts per hour, effective January 1, 1988. meter shall also be so arranged that upon the
Parking meter rates shall be increased to the expiration of the legal parking time, it will
following amounts over the next fifteen years: indicate by a mechanical operation and by
Effective Date of Increase gate proper signal that the lawful parking period
January 1, 1994 $0.40 has expired. (Prior code § 3213.1)
January 1, 1998 $0.50
January 1, 2003 $0.60 10.52.030 Time of operation.
C. Within the.area enclosed by diagonal The provisions of this chapter relating to
Iines on the parking meter zone map,the rate the operation of parking meters shall be ef-
for parking meters on streets or in municipal fective between the hours of nine am.and six
parking lots shall be fifty cents per hour ef- p.m.every day except Sundays;provided,that
fective June 1, 1991.Parking meter rates for for good cause.and upon a finding that such
this higher-rate zone shall be increased to the action will not jeopardize meter revenues as
following amounts over the next 15 years: a necessary source of revenue for payment of
Effective Date of Increase gate outstanding bonded indebtedness,the council
July 1, 1994by resolution may temporarily suspend the
$0.60 parking meter operating provisions of this
January 1, 1998 $0.70 chapter for any or all of the city's parking
January 1, 2003 $0.80 meters. (Ord. 1099 § 2, 1987: prior code §
(Ord. 1223 § 1, 1993: Ord. 1194 § 1, 1991: 3213.2)
Ord. 1099 § 1, 1987: prior code § 3213)
10.52.040 Operational procedure to be
10.52.020 Installation. followed.
A The city traffic engineer may cause Immediately after occupancy of a parking
parking meters to be installed and maintained meter space, the operator of a vehicle shall
in all parking meter zones. deposit a coin of the United States in the
B. Parking meters shall be installed upon parking meter and if necessary turn a crank,
the curb or sidewalk area immediately adja- knob or handle in accordance with the instruc-
cent to each parking space. Each meter shall tions posted on the face of the parking meter. .
be placed in such manner as to show or dis. (Prior code § 3213.4)
play by a sign or signal that the parking space
adjacent thereto is or is not legally in use. 10.52.050 Unlawful to allow vehicle to
C. Each parking meter shall be set to dis. remain parked after
play,after the operational procedure has been expiration of time.
.ompleted, a sign or signal indicating legal No operator of any vehicle shall permit the
barking for that period of time conforming to vehicle to remain parked-in any parking space
:he limit of parking time for the zone in which during any time that the meter is showing a
„e parking meter is installed,and shall con- signal indicating that such space is illegally
,inue to operate from the time of the comple- in use other than such time immediately after
.ion of the operational procedure until the the original occupancy as is necessary to op.
:�piration of the time fixed as the parking erate the-meter to show legal parking. (Prior
imit or a portion thereof for the part of the code § 3213.4)
ian Luis Obigm 9.93) - 218
9. Would you like to see metered parking around the center to open up more spaces for
Senior Center visitors?
Yes No
38.5 % 61.5 %
10. Would you object to cutting into the park to build a 20 space parking lot, for Senior
Center and park visitors?
Yes No
37.5 % 62.5 %
PARKING RECO'vQvIENDATIONS FOR SLO SENIOR CENTER PAGE IS
z
10.36.230-10.40.010
and no permits will be issued to the residence lot where vehicular parking has been re-
until the beginning of the next permit year stricted by a resolution adopted by the council;
and shall be guilty of an infraction.(Ord. 1264 provided, that signs specifying the restric-
§ 51 1994) tions, or conditions under which parking is
10.36.230 Residential parking permitted, shall have been posted at all en.
p g permits— trances to such property. Such signs shall be
Display required. approved both as to wording and posting by
Parking permits issued under Section the chief of police. (Prior code § 4220.10)
10.36.220 shall be displayed on a vehicle in a
manner prescribed by the Director of Public 10.36.240 Violation—Penalty.
Works.The method of display shall be clearly Every person convicted of a violation of any
stated on the rear of the permit. (Ord. 1264 § of the provisions of this chapter shall be pun-
s, 1994: Prior code § 3209.23) ished by a fine for each separate offense as
10.36.232 Enforcement. provided in Section 10.64.030. (Prior code §
Enforcement of the residential parking 3209.99)
permit district may be on a complaint basis
by residents within the district boundaries.
Enforcement personnel shall be dispatched on Chapter 10.40
an as-available basis as determined by the
City Parking Manager/Police Department.All STOPPING, STANDING OR
parking citations issued for noncompliance PARKING RESTRICTED OR
with the parking permit requirement shall PROHIBITED IN CERTAIN AREAS
be governed by the civil proceedings set forth Sections:
in the California Vehicle code. (Ord. 1264§7,
1994) 10.40.010 Twelve, fifteen,
twenty-four, thirty and
10.36.233 Parking in yard. thirty-six minute parking.
No person shall stop, park, or leave 10.40.020 One-hour parking.
standing any vehicle,whether attended or un- 10.40.030 Two-hour parking.
attended, within any street yard or upon any 10.40.040 Parking parallel on
unpaved surface as defined in Section one-way streets.
17.16.020 and Section 12.38.040 of this Mu- 10.40.050 Diagonal parking.
nicipal Code.Parking on lawfully established 10.40.060 Parking space markings.
driveways leading to approved parking spaces 10.40.070 No stopping zones.
is exempt from this prohibition,provided such 10.40.080 All night parking
allowed driveway parking does not include prohibited—Exception.
parking on or over a public sidewalk. Any
violation of this section shall be a civil pen- 10.40.010 Twelve, fifteen, twenty-four,
alty. (Ord. 1264 § 8, 1994) thirty and thirty-six minute
parking.
10.36.235 Restricted parking in certain A. Green curb markings shall mean no
city parking lots. standing or parking for a period of time longer
No person shall stop, stand, park or leave than twelve, fifteen, twenty-four, thirty or
standing a motor vehicle in any city parking thirty-six minutes as determined by the city
210-1 (San Luis Obispo 9.94)
10.40.020-10.40.040
traffic engineer, at any time between nine stricted to one direction upon any such
a.m. and six p.m. on any day except Sundays roadway, no person shall stand or park a ve.
and holidays. hicle upon the left-hand side of such one-way
B. When authorized signs,parking meters roadway unless signs are in place permitting
or curb markings have been determined by such standing or parking.
the city traffic engineer to be necessary and C. The city traffic engineer is authorized
are in place giving notice thereof,no operator to determine when standing or parking shall
of any vehicle shall stop, stand or park the be prohibited upon the left-hand side of any
vehicle adjacent to any such legible curb one-way roadway or a highway having two or
marking or sign or parking meter in viola. more separate roadways and shall erect signs
tion thereof. (Prior code § 3210) giving notice thereof.
D. The requirements of parallel parking
10.40.020 One-hour parking, imposed b this section shall not 1 in the
P Y PPY �
When authorized signs, parking meters or event any commercial vehicle is actually en-
curb markings have been determined by the gaged in the process of loading or unloading
city traffic engineer to be necessary and are freight or goods, in which case such vehicle
in place giving notice thereof, no operator of may be backed up to the curb; provided, that
any vehicle shall stop, stand or park said ve- such
hicle between the hours of nine a.m. and six
p.m. of any day, except Sundays and holi-
days, for a period of time longer than one
hour. (Prior code § 3210.1)
10.40.030 Two-hour parking.
When authorized signs, parlring meters or
:urb markings have been determined by the
:ity traffic engineer to be necessary and are
n place giving notice thereof, no operator of
my.vehicle shall stop, stand or park said ve-
sicle between the hours of nine am. and six
.m. of any day, except Sundays and holi-
ays, for a period of time longer than two
ours. (Prior code § 3210.2)
0.40.040 Parking parallel on one-way
streets.'
A. Subject to other more restrictive limi-
itions, a vehicle may be stopped or parked
ithin eighteen inches of the left-hand curb
.cing in the direction of traffic movement
Don any one-way street unless signs are in
acing prohibiting such stopping or standing.
B. In the event a highway includestwo or
ore separate roadways and traffic is re.
n Luis Obispo 9-94) 210.2
3
I 71!L D� GENDA
DACE 5 ITEM #
To: Mayor Allen Settle
Vice Mayor Bill Roalman
Councilman Dave Romero
Councilwoman Kathy Smith
Councilwoman Doddie Williams
From: Bill Storm, President, San Luis Obispo Chapter.AARP
Subject: May 20, 1997 Agenda item C4, Senior Center Parking.
The Board of the San Luis Obispo Chapter of The American Association of
Retired Persons, a major user of the City Senior Center, has authorized me to
ask your support for all items submitted by Mike McCluskey, of City Staff, for
your approval at the May 20 meeting.
We consider this a fair initial step in providing access for those Senior who
are attending meetings lasting less than two hours, and we do not feel the changes
will be a major hardship to those who would stay for a longer period.
As to item four of the recommendations, we are pleased to report to you that
George Brudney, a Chapter Vice President will work with Ride-On to obtain a
program that can be used by all who wish to leave their car at Santa Rosa Park,
and then shuttle to the Center.
RECEWED 00UWc1 o E;srs
MAY 1 lyyl
m,Fjjp E3FlN
®,gyp
te ❑ r CHIS
e- , .
CITY COUNCIL �
❑ POLICE
Bill Storm _ C3MaMtTEW._ E3RECDIA
- 3057 S Hi era St., #96 .. ❑ c >=ILF- ❑ dmiMR
I p Pfi*51'
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
.(805) 541-8822 '
.May 16, 1997