HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/1999, C4 - CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE NOMINATION OF PROPERTIES TO THE CONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES.D
FROM:
council
acEnaa
C I T Y OF SAN L U I S O B I S P O
Arnold Jonas, Community Development Dime tor
Prepared By: Jeff Hook, Associate Plgor-
SUBJECT: CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE NOMINATION OF
PROPERTIES TO THE CONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC
RESOURCES.
1 -5 -99
C4
CAO RECONEWENDATION: Adopt a resolution adding 17 properties to the Contributing
Properties List.
DISCUSSION
Advisory Body Recommendation. On July 7' and October 26th, 1998, the Cultural
Heritage Committee (CHC) voted unanimously to nominate the following properties to the
Contributing Properties List (minutes attached):
• 742 and 755 Center Street
a 30, 45, 59, 63, 69, 115, 116, 128, 158, 173, 183, 190, 211 and 360 Chorro Street
• 412 Marsh Street
Situation. One of the CHC's 1997 -99 workprogram priorities is updating the City's Master
List of Historic Resources. Earlier this year the CHC began its update by reviewing properties
in the Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anhohn neighborhood for architectural or historical significance.
This is the second group of properties nominated for historic status from that neighborhood.
Of 23 properties in this group initially reviewed, 17 properties were nominated as Contributing
structures due to their age, (at least 50 years old), condition and architectural style. Those
candidate properties are now ready for Council consideration. City Council approval is
required to add properties to the Master or Contributing List of Historic Resources.
The purposes of the historic listing are: 1) to recognize buildings which contribute to the City's
architectural, cultural and historical diversity, 2) to help preserve and restore buildings which are
historically or architecturally significant; 3) to help preserve the historic character of
neighborhoods, and 4) to make certain historic properties eligible for preservation incentives,
such as rehabilitation loans, tax incentives, or more flexible building or zoning codes. Based on
the properties' historic documentation, advisory body recommendations, and public testimony,
the City Council should decide whether the properties meet the eligibility criteria for adding
them to the Contributing Properties List. These criteria were adopted by the City Council and
are listed in the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (criteria attached). If the
Council concurs with the CHC's nomination, it should adopt the attached resolution adding the
properties to the Contributing Properties List.
C4 -1
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 2
Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anholm Neighborhood. With the exception of 412 Marsh
Street, all of the properties are located within the Mt. Pleasanton Square/Anhohn neighborhood,
an area comprised of two residential subdivisions developed in the 1920s and 1930s and located
northwest of Downtown between the base of Cerro San Luis Obispo and Stenner Creek.
Predominant architectural styles are Mission Revival, Spanish Colonial revival, Tudor Revival,
Craftsman, and California Bungalow, reflecting popular architectural styles of that time. The
area's popularity was due, in part, to its proximity to Downtown and sheltered location on the lee
side of Cerro San Luis. Early residents include many prominent educators, business owners and
professionals, including:
• George and Chris Anholm, subdividers.
• Letham E. McDougal, Civil Engineer, Highway Commission.
• James F. Merson, Teacher, Cal Poly.
• Marvin E. Arnold, Bookkeeper, Booth Brothers.
• J. J. Dunne, Chevrolet Dealer.
• Thomas W. Raycraft, Asst. County Farm Advisor.
This continues to be an attractive, recognizable neighborhood, with most homes in good
condition and many in original or near - original architectural character. Because of the apparent
concentration of architecturally and historically important homes, the CHC has discussed the
possibility that the Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anholm neighborhood may merit historic district
status. As an initial step, the CHC is reviewing all properties within these two subdivisions for
their architectural and historical significance.
Master and Contributing
Properties Lists. Procedures for
historic nomination are found in the
Historic Preservation Program
Guidelines. There are two categories of
historic resources: Master List properties
and Contributing properties. The Master
List of Historic Resources consists of 167
of the City's most important residential
and commercial structures which have
significant historic or architectural value
to the community and which merit Figure l: A Master List Property - Myron Angel Home, 1886
special preservation and recognition.
Master List properties are eligible to receive a historic plaque, commemorating the historic name
and date of the building. Some of these properties are also eligible for State or Federal historic
designation, and may qualify for tax incentives such as the federal tax credits or the Mills Act
Program. Once added to the Master List, exterior building changes are possible, provided that
such changes promote the structure's original architectural style and character. Demolition is
CAF -a4.
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 3
also possible, subject to Architectural Review Commission approval. According to the Historical
Preservation Program Guidelines, demolition of an historical resource should be done only when:
"1) the condition of the budding poses a threat to the health, safety or welfare of community
residents or people living or working on or near the site, or 2) the project sponsor demonstrates
that it financially infeasible to rehabilitate the structure or preserve the historic nature of the site."
The Contributing Properties List contains
about 400 properties, most of which are
houses within designated historic
districts. Contributing properties consist
of structures, gardens or other features
which are at least 50 years old and
which, while not necessarily unique or
associated with an important person or
historical event, contribute to the
architectural or historical character of
their neighborhood. Contributing
properties listing is primarily an
honorary designation. Changes to
Contributing properties do not require
a cetr or historical review
beyond that which would normally be Figure 2. A Contributing Historic Property - 301 Broad St.,
1930.
required (none, for additions and
remodels to single dwellings or duplexes), although city policies encourage their preservation.
Both Master List and Contributing List properties are considered "historic" and may qualify for
more flexible zoning and building codes to encourage their preservation and upkeep.
General Plan Policy. Policy 6.6.1 of the General Plan Land Use Element says that the City
should identify, preserve and where possible restore historic resources. By designating eligible
properties as historic, the City helps preserve important buildings and features of the
community's heritage. In so doing, the City and property owners work together to maintain the
distinctive architectural character and "sense of place" of both residential and commercial
neighborhoods.
Contributing Properties List Nominations
742 Center Street
Property Owner: Ella Gianolini
General Plan: Low Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One story Mission Revival style house on 7250 square foot lot.
Date Built: Historic Resource Survey (HRS) estimate, 1930.
Cit- 5
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 4
755 Center Street
Property Owner: Eric Tomac, et. ux.
General Plan: Low Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Spanish Colonial Revival style house with red clay tile roof on a 6800
square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1930.
30 Chorro Street
Property Owners: Martin and Elizabeth Nelson
General Plan: Low Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house on a 4600 square foot corner lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1932.
45 Chorro Street
Property Owners: O.B. and M.S. Young
General Plan: Low Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: Two -story Spanish Colonial Revival duplex on a 9407 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1940.
59 Chorro Street
Property Owners: Misak M. and Anie H. Kurkeyerian
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival style house on a 6000 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1948.
63 Chorro Street
Property Owner: David Rossi, et. al.
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house with gable tile roof on 6000 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1930.
69 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Marion Barasch
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Craftsman Bungalow style house on a 6000 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1930.
C4- N
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 5
115 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Lewis C. Baum, Tre et. al.
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house with parapet tile roof and shed roof over
porch arcade at front entry, on a 6525 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1930.
116 Chorro Street
Property Owners: Barry L. Bender
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Tudor Revival style house with hip roof and wood shingle siding, with
turret roof at front entry, on a 7070 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1930.
128 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Antonio E. Garcia
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Tudor Revival style house with cross - gabled, medium pitch roof with
diamond patterned shingles and crenelated parapet roof at the turret above the front entry, on a
7070 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1928.
158 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Marcia Heden, et-al.
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival style house with a parapet tile roof on 5750 square foot
lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1928.
173 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Timothy Williams
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house on a 5000 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1930.
183 Chorro Street
C4-5'
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 6
Property Owner: Gary A. Fourer
General Plan: Low - Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story, Mission Revival -style house with a shed roof over porch arcade on a 9250
square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS estimate, 1928.
190 Chorro Street
Property Owners: J.J. and M. Greathouse
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house with parapet roof and shed roof over front
entry and prominent stuccoed chimney in front, on a 5000 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1930.
211 Chorro Street
Property Owner: John L. Noggle Tre Et. Al.
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story "French Provincial" influenced style house on a 13,600 square foot corner
lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1936.
360 Chorro Street
Property Owner: Robert Beretta
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: One -story Mission Revival -style house on a 6805 square foot lot.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1929.
412 Marsh Street
Property Owners: Howard M. and Joy A. Becker
General Plan: Low- Density Residential
Zoning: R -1
Description: Two-story Craftsman Bungalow -style office building.
Date Built: HRS factual, 1914.
"; hI:A_ .W"; ILIJ
1. Do not adopt a resolution adding one or more of the candidate properties to the
Contributing List
2. Continue the nominations item for additional information or study and specify the
r,4- -%
Council Staff Report - CHC Historic Resource Nominations
Page 7
the additional information or analysis needed. There is no mandated deadline for action
on this item.
Attachments: -Draft resolution
- Vicinity Map
-CHC draft minutes
- Excerpt, Historical Preservation Program Guidelines (Appendix C)
- Historical Designation Criteria
Council Reading File: Historic Resource Inventories.
JWL- -% -CarPt
C4-7
RESOLUTION NO. (1999 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADDING PROPERTIES AT 742 AND 755 CENTER STREET; 30, 45, 59, 63, 69,115,116,
128,1589 1739 1839 1909 2119 AND 360 CHORRO STREET; AND 412 MARSH STREET
TO THE CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5197 establishing the
"Master List of Historic Resources" and "Contributing Properties List" (collectively referred to as
"Historic Resources'), along with procedures for adding properties to the listing, and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1998, and October 26, 1998 the Cultural Heritage Committee held
public hearings to consider recommending to the City Council the addition of several properties in
the City of San Luis Obispo to the Master List or the Contributing Properties List due to their
historical and/or architectural significance to their neighborhood and to the community, and
WHEREAS, at said meetings, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical
documentation on the following properties and recommended that the City Council add these
properties to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources:
• 742 AND 755 CENTER STREET
• 30, 45, 59, 63, 69, 115, 116, 128, 158, 173, 183, 190, 211, AND 360 CHORRO STREET
412 MARSH STREET
WHEREAS, this City Council considered this recommendation during a public hearing on
January 5, 1999 pursuant to historic preservation guidelines established by Council Resolution No.
6157 (1987 Series).
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San lids Obispo
that based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, documentation as described in
r 4-- 1
Council Resolution No. (1999 Series)
Page 2
the Historical Resource Inventory for each property, on file in the Community Development
Department, public testimony, the staff report, and on the City's Historical Preservation Program
Guidelines the following:
SECTION 1. Addition to Contributing Properties LisL The following properties have been
found to contribute to the historic and architectural character of the City and meet the criteria for
inclusion on the Contributing Properties List:
• 742 And 755 Center Street
• 30, 45, 59, 63,69, 115, 116,128,158,173, 183, 190, 211, and 360 Chorro Stmt
• 412 Marsh Street
SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The City Council hereby determines that this
action is not a "project" as defined in Article 20 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) since does not have the potential for resulting in a physical change in the environment, and
therefore, is not subject to environmental review requirements.
SECTION 3. Publish Revised Master List The Community Development Director is hereby
directed to amend the Contributing Properties List to include the properties listed above, and to
publish revised historic resource listings for public distribution.
On motion of , seconded by and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of January, 1999.
Gtr. -9
Council Resolution No. (1999 Series)
Page 3
ATTEST:
City
APPROVED:
City -Attorney
r.4--10
offlu
J - _
p �l►�
�1
0
W• •
uc
Mt_ Plea -qantnn /Anhnlm nPinhhnrhnncl
MINUTES
SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE
Regular Meeting of Monday, October 26,1998
The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room (Room 9), San Luis Obispo
City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson Steve McMasters, Paula Carr, Amy Kardel, Bob Pavlik, Bob
Schrage, and Matt Whittlesey.
Absent: Margot McDonald.
Staff: Jeff Hook, Associate Planner.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Madeline Ropner, 59 Benton Way, asked the Committee to consider initiating changes to the
City's Building and Fire Codes which prohibited replacement of wood shake and shingle roofs.
She explained that her mother's historic home at 59 Benton Way has the original wood shingle
roof; however the roof is leaking and needs to be repaired or replaced. She said that City codes
allow up to 50 percent of a wood shake or shingle roof to be replaced over time. After the 50
percent level is reached, further replacement would require that the whole roof be replaced with a
fire - resistive type roofing, like composition shingle or tile. She felt this requirement could
adversely affect the architectural character of her mother's property and that of other historic
properties.
On motion of Bob Pavlik, seconded by Matt Whittlesey, the Committee voted 5-0 (Comm r.
Kardel arrived late) to direct staff to bring this item back to the Committee at its November
meeting, with an evaluation of the wood shake and shingle requirement.
Jan Scarry, 64 Broad Street, wanted the CHC to consider including her property on the
Contributing Historic Property List, since it was one of the first houses built in the northerly Mt.
Pleasanton Square/Anholm neighborhoods.
In response to a question from Chairman McMasters, Mr. Hook stated that he would schedule
Ms. Scary's property for consideration as soon as possible and was waiting for the property to
provide some historic documentation, as the City did not have any historic documentation on this
property.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: On a motion by Committee member Schrage, seconded by
Committee member Whittlesey, the minutes of September 28, 1998 were approved as amended
on a 5:0 vote.
Committee member Kardel arrived at the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM:
G4 -J-L
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of October 26, 1998
Page 2
1. Consideration of nominating the following properties to the Contributing Properties List:
166 Chorro Street, 173 Chorro Street, 180 Chorro Street, 183 Chorro Street, 190 Chorro
Street, 211 Chorro Street, 288 Chorro Street and 360 Chorro Street. (McMasters; 30
minutes).
Committee members discussed the overall strategy for the property-by- property review of
houses leading to the possible creation of a Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anholm Historic District.
Commr. Whittlesey expressed concern that property owners could ask that their property be
deleted from historic consideration.
Mr. Hook said he had spoke with the City Attorney who had advised that while the CHC could
nominate properties for historic listing over owners' objections, it would behoove the CHC to
be flexible in this regard, particularly for those potentially contributing properties which were
not unique or threatened. Mr. Hook suggested that the CRC's review and listing of historic
properties was important in itself, since it met the CHC's workprogram to update historic
listings, whether or not the review led to creation of a historic district.
The Committee further discussed the property -by- property review process and agreed it was
the most appropriate approach at this time. Architectural standards, CHC goals, architectural
character and setting were also discussed. Committee members felt that the category of
"Potentially Contributing" could be useful for those properties which the owner chose not to
be included even though the property met criteria for historic listing; and for properties which
could be considered "Contributing" if property owners corrected past work done without
regard to the buildings' original architectural character. It was felt that this approach might
provide an incentive for property owners to restore original building features and materials.
Committee members reviewed the properties' historic documentation and photos and
recommended the following ( "Potentially Contributing" would not be nominated for historic
listing at this time):
-166 Chorro Street: Potentially Contributing, due to alternations to the front windows, garage
door and driveway.
-173 Chorro Street: Contributing.
-180 Chorro Street: Potentially Contributing,
due to roof and front window alterations and the installation of an unscreened, roof - mounted
forced -air unit.
-183 Chorro Street: Contributing.
-190 Chorro Street: Contributing.
-211 Chorro Street: Contributing (possibly eligible for the Master List).
-282 Chorro Street: Potentially Contributing (removed from consideration at owner's request;
otherwise it would be eligible for contributing).
-287 Chorro Street: Potentially Contributing (removed from consideration at owner's request;
otherwise it would be eligible for contributing).
C+-13
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of October 26, 1998
Page 3
-288 Chorro Street: Potentially Contributing (removed from consideration at owner's request;
otherwise it would be eligible for contributing).
-360 Chorro Street: Contributing.
On a motion by Committee member Kardel, seconded by Committee member Carr, the
Committee voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council add 173, 183, 190, 211 and 360
Chorro Street to the Contributing Historic Properties List.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
2. CHC Goals and Workprogram Planning for 1999 -2001.
After a brief discussion, and on a motion by Committee member Kardel, seconded by
Committee member Pavlik, the Committee voted 6-0 to approve the following workprogram
goals and to forward them to the City Council for approval:
GOAL 1: PREVENT BUILDING SAFETY HAZARDS, PRESERVE IMPORTANT HISTORIC BUILDINGS,
AND GUIDE BUILDING RESTORATION AFTER A MAJOR EARTHQUAKE OR OTHER
DISASTER.
'Program 1: Prepare community handout on preventing safety hazards in historic
buildings.
Program 2: Prepare and adopt Post - Disaster Historic Preservation Program Guidelines
after considering the State Model Ordinance.
GOAL 2: ESTABLISH PROPERTY OWNER ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND INCENTIVES TO
ENCOURAGE THE PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES.
'Program 3: Adopt City - sponsored Historic Building Rehabilitation Loan Program for
historic residential and commercial buildings.
'Program 4: Continue Historic Plaque Program for Master List Properties.
'Program 5: Develop a Community Award for Historic Preservation.
GOAL 3: ENHANCE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND APPRECIATION OF HISTORICAL
PRESERVATION.
Program 6: Maintain and update the Master and Contributing Lists of Historic
Resources, with emphasis on potential annexation areas and threatened
structures.
'Program 7: Resume the walking tour program in historic districts.
'Program 8: Update and expand the City's Walk of History brochure, and consider using
a video format.
'Program 9: Establish a WEB "home page' on Historic Preservation in SLO.
'Program 10: Sponsor an archaeological demonstration dig in the
Downtown Area.
'Program 11: Establish a °Lost Treasures" Historic Point of Interest tour.
'Program 12: Provide entry signs for Historic Districts.
Program 13: Establish a Cal Poly student internship program in historic preservation.
GOAL 4: CONSIDER ESTABLISHING NEW HISTORICAL PRESERVATION
DISTRICTS.
Program 14: Consider establishing the following new historic districts:; Mt.
t:4 -14
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of October 26, 1998
Page 4
Pleasanton /Anholm; Ella Street; Little Italy; Monterey Heights; and Brook
Street.
GOAL 5: IMPROVE COMMUNICATION AMONG COMMUNITY GROUPS, CITY ADVISORY
BODIES AND CITY COUNCIL REGARDING HISTORIC RESOURCES.
Program IS: Hold joint meetings with City advisory bodies to encourage
unified, multi- purpose efforts toward historic preservation.
Program 16: Hold neighborhood outreach meetings to explain and discuss new historic
preservation programs.
GOAL 6: IMPROVE AND EXPAND COMMITTEE MEMBERS' KNOWLEDGE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
ISSUES, STRATEGIES AND TECHNIQUES.
'Program 17: Provide opportunities for continuing education /in- service training for committee
members.
'Program 18: Promote information sharing by expanding the CHC historic, library, including
evaluations of historic preservation programs in other communities.
Program 19: Conduct annual field trips focusing on important preservation issues and key CHC
workprogrom tasks.
3. CHC Field Trip Planning (continued from the August 24, 1998 meeting).
The Committee discussed the planned "endangered structures" field trip and decided to
reschedule the trip for Saturday, January 23, 1999. Members asked staff to prepare a map for
the November meeting showing possible tour stops.
INFORMATION ITEMS
• Report on Mayor's Quarterly Luncheon: Matt Whittlesey reported on the luncheon and
said it was interesting and informative.
• List of historic properties under Mills Act contracts: Mr. Hook presented the list of
properties under Mills Act contracts and explained that three or possibly four more historic
properties would be added this year.
• Planning Commission letter on Ella Street neighborhood: Steve McMasters explained that
the Planning Commission had sent a letter asking the CHC to consider establishing an Ella
Street Historic District. He said that he had left the draft response letter home and that he
would bring it next time. He suggested the CHC take up the Ella Street neighborhood
next, after completing its review of the Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anhohn neighborhood.
• National Trust for Historic Preservation Catalog: Mr. Hook noted that he had included
catalogs in each agenda packet, and it Committee members saw publications they thought
should be included in the CHC historic library, to please let him know.
Committee member Kardel noted that a historic post - mounted U.S. mailbox had been removed
from the comer of Buchon and Broad Streets and asked staff to look into the matter. She said
the mailbox had been there for many years and felt that it added a lot to the Old Town Historic
District character.
Committee member also discussed the upcoming December meeting and decided to cancel the
regular meeting scheduled for December 28, 1998 due to holiday schedule conflicts and to
C4 -15
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of October 26, 1998
Page 5
schedule a special dinner meeting to install new CHC members and thank members who retired
in 1998 on Monday, December 14, 1998. Members decided to hold the dinner at Beau's
Russia Cafd House and Tea Room, a restaurant in a historic downtown building. Mr. Hook
said he would make the necessary arrangements.
Committee members asked that next month's agenda include the following items:
ITEMS FOR THE NOVEMBER 23, 1998 CHC AGENDA: (McMasters).
• Review properties in the Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm neighborhood for possible historic
designation.
• Mission Plaza Expansion plans.
• Mandersheid House archaeological study (when ready).
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. to the regular CHC meeting to be held on Monday,
November 23, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room in City Hall, 990 Palm
Street, San Luis Obispo.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Hook, Recording Secretary/Associate Planner
j":csc10-98.ndn
G4 -16
MINUTES
SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COAD4 EE
Regular Meeting of Monday, July 27,1998
The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room (Room 9), San Luis Obispo
City Hall, 990 Palm Street.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chairperson Steve McMasters, Paula Carr, Amy Kardel, Bob Pavlik Bob Schrage
and Matt Whitdesey. (one seat vacant)
Absent: None.
Staff: Jeff Hook, Associate Planner.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
On motion of Committee member Kardel, seconded by Committee member Carr, the minutes
were approved as amended on a 6-0 vote.
BUSINESS ITEM
1. Presentation and review of individual Committee members' updated draft sections of
the Historic Resource Preservation Guidelines
Committee member Kardel introduced the item and suggested that members edit the rough
draft, starting at the beginning and including individual member's editorial changes. Members
agreed on the review format and numbered the draft pages. After about one hour of editing,
members had reviewed up to "Principles of Historic Preservation" and decided to continue
their review at a future meeting. Members discussed the possibility of holding a special
meeting to finish editing and asked staff to get back with members on the special meeting date
and time.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
2. Review exterior changes to the historic Mugler House, located at 1460 Mill Street, R -2
zone.
Floyd W. Larcher, owner, described his planned remodel and explained that the proposed roof
skylights will blend in with the roof design and materials. He said that the skylights were
operable but would normally be in the closed position. He noted that the remodel included
replacing an aluminum sliding door and several windows with more historically appropriate
wood door and windows.
cl -11
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of July 27, 1998
Page 2
Members felt that the proposed changes were in keeping with the home's original architectural
character and after a brief discussion, on a motion by Amy Kardel, seconded by Bob Schrage,
voted to approve the exterior changes as submitted on a 6:0 vote.
DISCUSSION ITEM
3. Consideration of nominating these properties to the Contributing Properties List: 742
and 755 Center Street, 30, 45, 59, 63, 69, 73, 115, 116, 128, and 158 Chorro Street;
and 412 Marsh Street.
Jeff Hook introduced the item and explained that this was the third group of properties in the
Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anhohn neighborhood being reviewed for historical or architectural
significance. At the previous meeting, the Committee had determined that there was sufficient
information on these properties to consider nomination to the Contributing Properties List.
Committee members discussed each property individually and on a motion by Paula Carr,
seconded by Amy Kardel, voted 6:0 to nominate the following properties to the Contributing
Properties List: 742 and 755 Center Street; 30, 45, 59, 63, 69, 115, 116, 128, and 158
Chorro Street, and 412 Marsh Street. 73 Chorro Street was determined not to be eligible for
Contributing status because it had been highly modified from its original architectural design
by a two-story addition at the rear of the building.
INFORMATION ITEMS
• Thank you letter to former Committee member Loren Nicholson.
All members signed the thank you letter and Mr. Hook said he would send the letter to Mr.
Nicholson.
• League For Protection of Oakland's Architectural Resources v. City of Oakland.
Mr. Hook briefly explained that this case, as described in the brief attached to the agenda
packet, underscored the important role that "protection of historic resources" plays in the
environmental review process under CEQA. He noted that the First Appellate District Court
found in favor of the City of Oakland's contention that the Montgomery Ward Building was
historic and merited protection, even though it had not been formally classified by the City as a
"protected historic resource."
ITEMS FOR THE AUGUST 24, 1998 CHC AGENDA: Committee members asked that the
following items be placed on the August 24t° agenda:
- Status of Sunny Acres Building
- Continued review of Historic Preservation Program Guidelines
G4-I A
CHC Minutes, Regular Meeting of July 27, 1998
Page 3
- Review of additional Mt. Pleasanton Square /Anholm properties
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. to the regular CHC meeting to be held on Monday,
August 24, 1998, at 5:30 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room in City Hall, 990 Palm Street,
San Luis Obispo.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Hook, Associate Planner
r 7- 9s.min
"- if
'
ONE in
B. WHAT PROPERTIES ARE HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT?
There are two types of historic properties in San Luis Obispo:
Individual buildings that have significant historic or architectural value are
called "Historical Resources."
Buildings in older neighborhoods that contribute to the character of that
neighborhood are called "contributing" structures.
Owners of these properties may be eligible for benefits and services described in
the next section. Additional information about historic properties is presented
below.
1. Historical Resources
In 1981 a citizens committee, appointed by the City Council, surveyed the older
buildings in town — those built before 1941. After studying the history and
architecture of these buildings, the City Council approved a listing of properties
that are considered Historical Resources. There are five classes of resources. The
definition of each class and the "master list" of historical resources are included
in Appendix B of these guidelines.
The city is continuing to study the history of its older neighborhoods, so more
historic sites may be added to the list. Check with the Community Development
Department for the most up -to -date listing. Also, property owners may conduct their
own research and ask the City Council to add their property to the list. More
information about this procedure is included in Appendix C.
Historical Preservation Districts
In 1987, the City Council created three Historical Preservation Districts. The
purpose of the districts is to identify older parts of San Luis Obispo that exhibit
an important part of our community's history. The districts are shown on Figure #1
and include the downtown business district and parts of the older residential
neighborhoods that surround it.
Buildings within each district have been classified as "contributing" or
"non- contributing" Contributing buildings add to the historic character of the
neighborhood. Non - contributing buildings are typically newer structures that do not
support the prevailing historic character of the area.
The boundaries of historic districts can change over time. Check with the Community
Development Department for the most up -to -date map. Citizens may ask the City
Council to create new historical districts or change the boundaries of existing
ones. Information about this procedure is included in Appendix E.
2
APPENDIX C. Procedures for adding properties to the
Master List of Historical Resources.
1. Who Can Apply,
Any person may request that a property be added to the Master List of Historical
Resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee, Architectural Review Commission, Planning
Commission or the City Council may also initiate an application.
2. Where and How to ADW
A standard application form must be completed and submitted to the Community
Development Department. The form must be accompanied by all available information
that documents the historical importance and architectural character of the building
or site.
There is no fee for applying for Historical Resource designations.
For information about data sources and help with preparing an application, contact the
Cultural Heritage Committee.
3. Actions by the Cultural Heritage Committee.
The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) will review the application and decide whether
it merits consideration. If the CHC finds that an application merits consideration, a
public hearing will be scheduled and the applicant will be notified.
The time, date and place of the public hearing will be advertised in the Telegram
Tribune newspaper. At the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the
hearing date, the CHC will recommend that the property be added or not added to the
Master List of Historical Resources. When evaluating an application, the CHC will use
the attached criteria.
4. Actions by the Citv Council.
Within sixty days from the CHC action on an application, the City Council will decide
if the property should be added to the Master List of Historical Resources. These
decisions will be made at an advertised public hearing. The applicant will be
notified of the hearing date.
In making these decisions, the City Council will consider the CHC's recommendations,
public testimony and application materials. The action of the City Council is final.
If the City Council approves the addition of a property to the Master List of
Historical Resources, the City Clerk will send the applicant a copy of the council
resolution that affirms this action.
City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage committee
t
DELINEATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE CRITERIA
FOR BUILDING EVALUATION AND RECOMD'IENDATIONS
ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA
I. Style
Describes form of building such as size, structural shape and details within
that form (i.e., arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.)
Building style will be evaluated as a measure of:
I. The relative purity of a traditional style (as compared to building styles
in San Luis Obispo);
2. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and /or current rarity
although the structure reflects a once popular style;
3. Traditional, vernacular and /or eclectic influences that represent a
particular social milieu and period of the community; and /or the uniqueness
of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together.
4. The degree to which the structure has maintained its integrity (i.e.,
assessment of alterations and structural condition, if known).
II Design
Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic
merit and craftmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular
style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing
of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect (i.e.,
carpenter- builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s).
Building design will be evaluated as a measure of:
I. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness,
artistic merit, details and craftsmanship;
2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though
not necessarily unique;
3. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among
carpenter - builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not
be superior.
c4-1_1�
III. Arse
Age is a measure of how relatively old a structure is in the context of the
history of San Luis Obispo, primarily Anglo- American history (circa 1850). (See
Scale of Building Age).
CRITERIA FOR BUILDING EVALUATIONS
IV. Architect
Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the
building design and plans of the structure.
The architect will be evaluated as a reference to:
1. A master architect (e.g., Wright).
2. A known architect who made significant contributions to the state or region
(e.g., Julia Morgan).
3. An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions
to San Luis Obispo (e.g., Abrahams who, according to local sources,
designed the house at 810 Osos - Frank Avila's father's home - built
between 1927 - 30).
4. An early architect who is otherwise of no special significance but can be
identified as a professional (e.g., pioneer architects of the region as
confirmed by AIA archival membership records of California and the Central
Coast).
V. Environmental Design Continuity
Describes the inter - relationship of structures and their relationship to a
common environment. Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship, and visual
character of a street, neighborhood, or area.
Environmental design continuity will be evaluated as a measure of the:
1. Symbolic importance of a structure to the community and the degree to which
it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (i.e., easily accessible to
the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place).
2. Compatibility of a structure with neighboring structures in its setting on
the basis of period, style (form, height, roof lines), design elements,
landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create
an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting.
3. Similarity to and /or compatibility of a structure with its neighboring
structures which, collectively, although of no particular aesthetic value,
combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive
character.
C4--,14
HISTORICAL CRITERIA
VI. History - Person
Describes a person, group, organization, or institution that has been connected
with the structure, either intimately or secondarily, for at least two
generations (i.e., 40 years).
Historical person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person
or group was:
1. Significant to the community as a public leader (i.e.; mayor, congressman,
etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition - locally,
regionally, or nationally.
2. Significant to the community as a public servant who has made early,
unique, or outstanding contributions to important local affairs or
institutions (i.e., councilmen, educators, medical professionals, _
clergymen, railroad officials).
3. Contributions which, though minor, directly or indirectly, had a beneficial
effect on the community (i.e., firemen, law enforcement officers, postal
workers, businessmen /shopkeepers, city employees, etc.).
VII. History - Event
Associated with a social, political, economic, governmental, educational or
other institutional event that has been important to the community.
Historical event will be evaluated as a measure of:
1. A landmark, famous, or first -of -its -kind event for the city - regardless of
whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city.
2. A relatively unique or interesting contribution to the city (i.e., the Ali
Louis Store as the center for Chinese- American cultural activities in early
San Luis Obispo history).
3. A contribution which, though minor, nonetheless was important to the
community (ix., local interest groups); or, alternatively, a unique or
interesting contribution only loosely connected with the structure, object,
site, or district.
VIII. History- Context
Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of
political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental,
military, industrial, or religious history.
Historical context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it
reflects:
CA- -ate
1. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the
historical effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected
with the building (i.e., County Museum).
2. Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the
building (i.e., Park Hotel).
3. Secondary patterns of local history but loosely associated with the
building.
Historical context will also be evaluated on the basis of:
4. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and /or whether or not
the original foundation has been changed, if known.
rb_z t-