The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/19/2000, C6 - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW SIDEWALKS - CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 99820A council -o j acEnoa Rep= IC6ImNab. CITY OF SAN LUIS 0BISP0 FROM: Michael D. McCluskey,Director of Public Works Prepared By: Gregory A. Walker, Projects Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW SIDEWALKS—CITY SPECIFICATION NO. 99820A CAO RECONEWENDATION: • Authorize the CAO to approve plans and specifications to install new sidewalks and/or curb and gutter in various locations; • Advertise for bids; • Award the contract if the cost is less than the engineer's estimate. DISCUSSION As a part of the 1997-1998 budget,the City Council adopted a new on-going program to install new sidewalks,and/or curb and gutter as needed.In the 1999 Council consideration of this program,the Council directed staff to use the funds to install new sidewalks in conjunction with-the adopted Pavement Management Plan. Thus for 1999-2000 new sidewalks were installed in pavement maintenance area 3. Likewise,in 1999 the City Council adopted ResolutionNo. 8980(1999 Series),attached as Exhibit A,which guides staff selection of those areas to be selected for this work. Using that criteria,staff has proposed Exhibit B, (pages 1, 2, and 3) which reflect construction priorities I through 4 for Pavement Maintenance Program for area 4 4. Cost estimates are provided for each project, for each priority group,with a cumulative total also shown. Staff is recommending all projects shown as Priority 1 on Exhibit B for construction.Any funds remaining after these are completed would be used for the highest ranked Priority 2 projects. CONCURRENCES Community Development Department has given this project a categorical exemption. C6-1 Council Agenda Report—99820A Installation of New Sidewalks Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal year 2000-2001 budget contains$100,000 for support of the New Sidewalk Program. Staff recommends that this project maintain a contingency amount of 10%. Based upon priority areas established by Exhibit B, it is anticipated that work areas 1 through 16 will be completed under this project until the budgeted amount of$100,000 is exhausted. Area#4 Total Budgeted FY 00-01 $100,000 Engineer's Estimate $ 89,468 Contingency $ 8,900 $ 98,368 ALTERNATIVES The City Council may: • Pick and choose locations on list from Exhibit B • Direct staff to implement installation of sidewalk from Pavement Maintenance Area#4. Page 1 Priority# 1 • Provide additional funding (beyond the current $100,000 commitment for 2000- 2001 budget) ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: ResolutionNo. 8980(Series 1999) Exhibit B: Recommended sidewalk projects,costs and priorities Exhibit C: Pavement Maintenance Area Plan Map Exhibit D: Pavement Maintenance Area#4,sidewalk locations IACowdl Agenda ReporM\99820A Installation of new sidewalks.DOC C6-2 EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 8980(1999 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING CRITERIA AND SITE SELECTION PRIORITIES FOR NEW SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHEREAS,the City desires that its citizens have available, safe,convenient and suitably located sidewalks; and WHEREAS,many areas of the City do not have such sidewalks; and WHEREAS,the City desires such areas to be improved considering needs,hazards and the wishes of the neighborhoods; and WHEREAS,in 1998 the Council adopted a Pavement Management Plan that created eight major street maintenance areas and one specifically for the Downtown; and WHEREAS,said Plan directs that significant infrastructure improvements are to be made within each maintenance area in a consistent and logical manner, and WHEREAS,the Council is desirous of coordinating the New Sidewalk Construction Projects with the Pavement Management Plan to the greatest degree possible. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopts the following: SECTION 1. General Coordination and Prioritization a. The construction of new sidewalks should occur,to the maximum extent possible,in coordination with the management areas defined by the Pavement Management Plan and should be prioritized as follows: 1) Locations where safety can be improved,particularly safety of children. 2) Locations with a demonstrated pedestrian need. 3) Locations responding to a petition of neighbors representing 50%of the owners within a block. b. The installation of new sidewalks should include flexibility in design when considering topography and existing trees. SECTION 2. SSRecial Prioritization The Council at its discretion may consider construction of new sidewalks outside of the area priorities established by the Pavement Management Plan. In such instances priority should be given to: a_ Locations where safety can be improved,particularly safety of children. b. Locations with a demonstrated pedestrian need. C6-3898o EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B 2000-2001 NEW SIDEWALK COST INSTALATION LIST A=ARTERIAL CC=COLLECTOR COMMERCIAL SF=SAFETY CONCERNS S=SCHOOL RC=COLLECTOR RESIDENTIAL HP=HIGH PEDESTRIAN INT=INTERGERAL SIDEWALK DET=DETACHED SIDEWALK D/W=DRIVEWAY C/G=CURB&GUTTER H/C/R=HANDICAP RAMP PRIORITY 1 LOCATION TYPE DEMENTIONS TOTAL MET CRR EST.COST 1 2064 Hams intlsw 10m x 1.5m 15M2 S-HP $1,305.00 c/g 10 lin mtrs $1,100.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.7mh 12.9 M2 $1,290.00 2 2082 Harris int/sw 10m x 1.5m 15 M2 S-HP $1,305.00 cig 10 lin mfrs $1,100.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.7mh 12.9 M2 $1,290.00 3 2031 Harris int/sw 10.5m x 1.6m 16.8 M2 S-HP $1,461.00 c/g 10.5 lin mfrs $1,155.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.7mh 12.9 M2 $1,290.00 4 395 High (Harris side) int/sw 39.9m x 1.6m 63.8 M2 S-HP $5,550.00 c/g 39.9 lin mtrs $4,389.00 d/w 4.9mw x 2.7mh 13.2 M2 $1,323.00 h/clr 1-ramp $2,800.00 5 403 High (Hams side) int/sw 38.3m x 1.5m 57.4 M2 S-HP $4,993.00 dg 38.3 lin mtrs $4,213.00 d/w 7mw x 2.7mh 18.9 M2 $1,890.00 hlclr 1-ramp $2,800.00 6 1801 Nipomo int/sw 24.6m x 1.6m 39.3 M2 S-HP $3,419.00 c/g 24.6 fin mtrs $2,706.00 d/w 5.4mw x 2.7mh 14.5 M2 $1,450.00 7 640 Church(Nipomo side) int/sw 18.1m x 1.6m 28.9 M2 S-HP $2,514.00 h/dr 1-ramp $2,800.00 8 1728 Nipomo int/sw 21.3m x 1.6m 34 M2 S-HP $2,958.00 d/w 4.5mw x 2.4mh 10.8 M2 $1,080.00 9 1733 Nipomo int/sw 10.4m x 1.6m 16.6 M2 S-HP $1,444.00 10 1721 Nipomo intlsw 11m x 1.6m 17.6 M2 S-HP $1,531.00 11 639 Leff(Nipomo side) int/sw 31.3m x 1.5m 46.9 M2 S-HP $4,080.00 12 595 Leff(Nipomo side) intlsw 22.9m x 1.6m 36.6 M2 S-HP $3,184.00 13 1845 Broad(Upham side) int/sw 18m x 1.5m 27 M2 S-HP $2,349.00 c/g 18 lin mtrs. .$11980.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.4mh 11.5 M2 $1,150.00 h/c/r 1-ramp $2,800.00 14 666 Upham int/sw 14.3m x 1.6m .22.8 M2 S-HP $1,983.00 Gig 14.3 lin mtrs $1,573.00 2-d/w 2-37.6 M2 $3,760.00 15 2145'Harris (Branch side) det/sw 27.5m x 1.2m 33 M2 S-HP $3,003.00 16 2144 Price(Branch side) det/sw 40.8m x 1.2m 48.9 M2 S-HP $4,450.00 CUMULATIVE TOTAL PRIORITY 1 $89,468.00 Page 1 C64 EXHE131T s-2 PRIORITY 2 17 342 High(Carmel side) int/sw 34m x 1.5m 51 M2 SF-HP $4,437.00 h/c1r 2-ramps $5,600.00 18 375 Islay int/sw 40m x 1.5m 60 M2 SF-HP $5,220.00 h/c/r 1-ramp $2,800.00 19 303 High (Cypress side) int/sw 23.9m x 1.6m 382 M2 SF $3.323.00 dg 23.9 fin mtrs $2,629.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.4mh 11.5 M2 $1,152.00 h/c/r 1-ramp $2,800.00 20 2076 Cypress int/sw 10m x 1.6m 16 M2 SF $1,392.00 c/g 10 lim mtrs $1,100.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.4mh 11.5 M2 $1,152.00 21 2040 Cypress int/sw 9.6m x 1.6m 15.3 M2 SF $1,331.00 C/g 9.6 lin mtrs $1,056.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.4mh 11.5 M2 $1,152.00 22 2032 Cypress inUsw 10.7m x 1.6m 17.1 M2 SF $1,487.00 cig 10.7 lin mtrs $1,177.00 d/w 4.8mw x 2.4mh 11.5 M2 $1,152.00 23 430 Pismo(carmel side) inUsw 19.6m x 1.2m 23.5M2 SF $2,045.00 24 1332 Carmel int/sw 13.3m x 1.2m 15.9 M2 SF $1,383.00 25 1703 S.B. (Leff side) int/sw 35.9m x1.2m 43 M2 SF $3,741.00 d/w 4mw x 2.4mh 9.6 M2 $960.00 26 1641 S.B. (Leff side) inUsw 19m x 1.6m 30.4 M2 SF $2,645.00 d/w 6.5mw x 2.4mh 15.6 M2 $1,560.00 27 976 Leff int/sw 9.5m x 1.6m 152 M2 SF $1,322.00 d/w 4mw x 2.4mh 9.6 M2 $960.00 28 433 Pacific(Carmel side) int/sw 39.3m x 1.2m 47.1 M2 SF $4,097.00 c/g 39.3 lin mfrs $4,323.00 h/c/r $2,800.00 CUMULATIVE TOTAL PRIORITY 2 $64,796.00 PRIORITY 3 29 772 Leff int/sw 22.7m x 1.8m 40.8 M2 SF $3,550 d/w 6.5mw x 2.4mh 15.6 M2 $1,560 30 1703 Chorro(Leff side) int/sw 21 m x 1.8m 37.8 M2 SF $3,288 31 1706 Garden (Leff side) int/sw 272m x 1.8m 48.9 M2 SF $4,254 d/w 4.6mw x 2.4mh 11 M2 $1,100 32 1641 Garden (Leff side) int/sw 312m x 1.8m 56.1 M2 SF $4,885 33 747 Leff inVsw 11.3m x 1.6m .18 M2 SF $1,566 34 750 Leff int/sw 10m x 1.8m 18 M2 SF $1,566 35 737 Leff inUsw 10.3m x 1.6m 16.4 M2 SF $1,426 36 709 Leff int/sw 27.5m x 1.6m 44 M2 SF $3,828 CIO 4.1 lin mtrs $451 37 1708 Beach cfg 17 lin mtrs SF $1,870 d/w 17mw x 2.4mh 40.8 M2 $4,080 38 1750 Beach c/g 19 lin mtrs SF $2,090 d/w 19mw x 2.4mh 45.6 M2 $4,560 h/c/r 1-ramp $2,800 CUMULATIVE TOTAL PRIORITY 3 $42,874 PRIORITY 4 39 2010-2060 Parker int/sw 51.7m x 1.8m 93 M2 SF $8.091 Page 2 C6-5 EXHIBIT B-3 CIO 51.7 lin mtrs $5,687 d/w 12mw x 2Amh 28.8 M2 $2,880 40 2103 Parker int/sw 4.8m x 1.8m 8.6 M2 SF $748 cig 4.8 lin mtrs $528 2-d/w 5.3mw x 2.4mh 25.4 M2 $2,540 41 245 Higuera(Parker side) int/sw 6m x 1.8m 10.8 M2 SF $940 (Ratliff Welding dg 6 lin mtrs $660 d/w 10mw x 2.4mh 24 M2 $2,400 42 239 Higuera(Parker side) int/sw 27m x 1.8m 48.6 M2 SF $4,228 (1Mlbanks Carpets) C/g 27 lin mtrs $2,981 d/w 9.7mw x 2.4mh 232 M2 $2,320 43 2146 Parker(corn outlet) int/sw 77.3m x 1.8m 139.1 M2 SF $12,105 cig 77.3 lin mtrs $8,503 2-d/w 9mw x 2.4mh 43.2 M2 $4,320 44 219 Higuera(Parker side) int/sw 13m x 1.8m 23.4 M2 SF $2,035 (Webers Bread) C/g 13.1 lin mtrs $1,430 2-d/w 7mw x 2.4mh 33.6 M2 $3,360 45 2191 Parker int/sw 29.7m x 1.8m 53.4 M2 SF $4,651 rig 29.7 lin mtrs $3,267 d/w 10.9mw x 2.4mh 26.1 M2 $2,610 h/cIr $2,800 46 193 South(BeeBee side) int/sw 175m x 1.8m 315 M2 SF $27,405 (West side street) c/g 175 lin mfrs $19,250 2-h/c/r $5,600 . 47 205 South (BeeBee side) int/sw 58m x 1.8m 104.4 M2 SF 9,082 C/g 58 lin mtrs $6,380 d/w 7.4mw x 2.4mh 17.7 M2 $1,770 48 Bridge int/sw 123m x 1.8m 221.4 M2 SF $19,261 (between BeeBee/Higuera c1g 123 fin mtrs $13,530 49 195 Brook(South side) int/sw 20.5m x 1.8m 36.9 M2 SF $3,210 (Brook side) . " 20.1 m x 12m 24.1 M2 $2,096 50 23 South(South side) int/sw 63m x 1.8m 113A M2 SF $9,865 (Brook side) 19.1m x 1.2m 22.9 M2 $1,992 51 190 Brook int/sw 9.4m x 1.2m 112 M2 SF $974 . 52 183 Brook int/sw 5.9m x 12m 7 M2 SF $609 53 180 Brook int/sw 8.9m x 1.2m 10.6 M2 SF $922 54 176 Brook int/sw 6.8m x 12m 6.8 M2 SF $704 55 175 Brook int/sw 14.9m x 12m 17.8 M2 SF $1,548 56 171 Brook int/sw 82m x 12m 9.8 M2 SF $852 57 165 Brook int1sw 10.2m x 1.2m 122 M2 SF $1,061 58 170 Brook (city park) int/sw 16.9m x 1.2m 20.2 M2 SF $1,757 59 642 Emily(Round side) int/sw 35.4m x 1.8m, 63.7 M2 SF $5,542 cig 35.4 lin mtrs $3,894 h/c/r 1-ramp $2,800 642 Emily(east side st) int/sw 68.9m x 1.8m 124 M2 SF $10,788 cig 68.9 lin mtrs $7,579 d/w Bmw x 2.4mh 192 M2 $1,920 d/w 6.9mw x 2.4mh 16.5 M2 $1,650 60 Emily(West side) int(sw 74.9m x 1.8m 134.8 M2 SF $11,727 {Fire Station#1) cig 74.9 lin mtrs $8,239 61 S.B.St. High to Morro OMITTED DUE TO STREET WIDENING CUMULATIVE TOTAL PRIORITY 4 $261,091 Page 3 C6-6 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C Appendix 1 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE AREAS PLAN Tatd Squme OOeOms per Ams �. 266340. 6. 243708. 2. 267523. 7. 266613. 3. 254971. 8. 242216. 4. 266063. 9. 87693. N �J. 232131. tO131 2106648. APRL 1998 I i f. 1 f� it r 3 i I i • i I C6-7 / 1 : ► III From: Ken Hampian To: Department Heads Date: 8/28/00 3:39PM Subject: Interim CDD Director After discussing various options with CDD managers,we will not be appointing an interim CDD director. Instead,John Mandeville(Long Range Planning),Tom Bausch (Building),and Ron Whisenand (Development Review)will each be the"CDD director°of their own divisions, and will attend meetings previously attended by Arnold, as appropriate to their area. Any department-wide issues will be decided collectively among the three of them. Any matters that can't be decided in this way will be reviewed with the CAO or ACAO,who will make the final call(not anticipated to happen, but just in case). I ask that you do the following: Include John, Ron,or Tom, in meetings or issues that you might otherwise have invited Arnold, if appropriate and necessary. In terms of what is°necessary", recognize that their time is already limited and, as such,they will not be able to completely fill the void left by Arnold's absence. So be discriminating in asking them to attend added meetings. Lastly, please forward this message to appropriate staff within your departments. Our thanks to Tom,John,and Ron for taking this on and handling the interim period in what we expect will be a very smooth fashion. CC: Baasch,Tom; Mandeville,John; Whisenand, Ron