The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/21/2000, 7 - USER FEES _ //2 6 0 BELSHER & BECKER C ATTOMEYS AT LAW 411 MARSH STREET SAN LUIS OBISPO,CALIFORNL4 93401 TELEPHONE 805-541-9900 FAX 805-541.9949 JOHN W.BELSHER E-MAIL SLOLAW@aol.com HOWARD\LARK BECKER November 21, 2000 City Council City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Re: User fees Dear Councilmember: The SLO Property Owners Association requests that the Council consider refusing to adopt increases to Planning fees. Our City Planning fees are already three times fees in other cities in our County. See the attached fee comparison prepared by Home Builders Association dated June, 2000. Sincerely, J" W. BELSHER JWB/ab A F %OP Or g-v 00' 00000"" ji I ......... T . ..I ...... rr 45. Home Nuilders Associationtion OF THE CENTRAL COAST. -It ,!srew IL Q. "V 74 Is toil wor- !Z - 71 ,%X Ip Ale t1"r�.•Y�'1 • i JI•�. s R City Valuation' 170,182.00: 140,000.00 I 184,500.00 M01�Tdcessin� n 10 acresl _Tentative MapI_- 33.73:' .I 14.959 . ! 21.88 Final Map -.- Environmental EnvironmentalImpact Study- { 10 I- 17. Annexation ------ ----- I _. _�- - 0' f r. _Compliance- - I---- 1 Y _Design Review 2.83 " _Development Agreement _ I 7T. I '<, y1 f ;' ��'��_ General Plan Amendment _ - y- 21.2 !t / s _Planned DevelopmLPRD ent )_ " .I 19.05 "`i 20.631 +as• Rezone ,F::-1----- - r 14 I -- 20.631 _Seriiitive Lind/Resources t _ Special Use Permit _ _ `�----�`_ -'---' 13. 3 {r -Site Development Plan ��j 1----- ---' 10�Ot __Specific Plan - --- „� 37.5011: - X 01 Variance _- 12.1373.•.I _ 71.85 Other 's - __ Grading Plan Check 5.18 1.13' 1_ 1:84 r,: _Grading Permit 1 _ _ 19.23A- _ _ 5.96 _ _ 9.7� Encroachment 2.38 :' ___-_-1�.3 ___ Improvement Plan Check - I 2.5074 5.00 Improyemen_t-Inspection --- 10.0014 Geotechnical/Soils Review 1 Landscaping Plan Check - - - -- I `- Permit Fees . Plan Check I 812.50: ,1 831.00 : : __ 943.80 --Building Permit --- - ` ' --- 1�250�0's-i -- 'j 1 750:25 fv1PE Permits ._-___ - 234.00 :: i 3 2.00 I _ u Ener9Y_- _ ____ 125 00 ::1 I Seism lc_(SMIP) - 1702 `I 15.000-:_ 18.50 _ Development Impact_Fees_- 204 00-T- I _2,222.00 rte" ___. Traffic rans ortation -�P )_ Water --- ------- � =-�---- -- Fire - - ] --- Police - ----- � ---- ;l _ .-I - Adm_inisiration -- 1 .1 acIlCapacity Fees Sewer _ J -_ 2,400.00' - 1 2,000.00" ; 828.00' Water : . - 3,642.004.5'a 2080.000__ 1,600 001 ? Water Meter Installation _ 75.004 11.1 180.00.' 1,250.00 Public Facilities(Building Tax)_ - .- - 400.00 •-. -.-Traffic' _. ,--_._..� 1 ----_ 175.001?.ry-------p4 --Parks - 1;643.00 7 708.00, i ?4 Fire _ _ 606.244.. 24 Police ------ -- 24 . - ----- Road Improvement____ ! _ 3,332.00-'1-1 ---- 24 -Brid'inkier I 65^007: 150.00 ge Development - Drainage/flood--- 1 _IricluiionaryHousing^- 7.1 Specific Plan ----- 1 Other ------ 1--- - 1,001.008 2,200.0076 50.601 Subtotal 19,313:48 11,511.40 8,827.07 _ School Fees Per S_q_Ft.z J-- 1.93" 1.93 .1 ____ 1.65 School Fee Total 3,860.00 3,860.00. 1 3,300.00 Total 23,173.48 o 12,127.07 • o0o ro 0o rt1571250,00 .31.11 i• " '• 1. Valuation is based on city's determination of 8. Pubic Facility Fees:Library'$292, 13.Within P.D Zone=$485. prototype representative. Government:$503;Sheriff:$126, Outside P.D.Zone=$382. 2. Bi-Annual Review in process. Administration:$80 14.Fee is not fixed.Based on percenta e Some districts may adopt allowable increased 9. Within P.D.zone-$598,outside P.D.zone of Public works Improvements,inc f'ding maximum price. _$488 : grading.Fee is 4%for inspection+1%for 3. For slopes over 10%,add$515 for required 10..15%of EIR or Env.Doc.Contract✓it cost plan check.Fee shown was averaged vaned t • Environmental Review of document prepared b consultant of staff 178 DU completed or permitted within the i '.i•i ri P Y P "° � ;•.. y?I tir...��•Y,.^ +_,.,;:1 4. Templeton Community Services District used. (time 6t material) � past year. S. Includes$25 water letter 11.Deposit(to cover per hour fees and material 15.Traffic Signal fee 6. Includes$65 Fire Letter of staff) 16 Water Neutralization Fee �° pdyI-,� ' '3� '� ,+''•_ 7. Plan review®.025 sq.fL 12.See development code 17.Direct Cost if applicable+1 S% 18.$300+Direct Cost+15% -��±�.r �• >♦i3'5��11�Y .• " � �? $� y.Ar+-•i..�i � f.y�'`YSf4`+Y� d�s--r t` .,S��. f�!�•w,. ° �5 C'-' ..1 ...MYn'�`�i`�� '-� -},,, � •.. ••y,x-' .7,.^1� Fv ��r .='�, , +..st cv� �. .. t. ��`�+�1 � \_.yM1a a~, �:� PROTOTYPE:40 Iots.on.10 acre subdl. `ori, each lot' smgl.e family detacFied =lling.unit r:vyith.�000 sq..ft..living area, 600 sq.ft.garage,:fireplace, gas and,electric hookups,and type V =const_'ructiori on improved 7500 sq.ft. lot.Templeton was used as the unincorporated county `area exam le Totals.are}calculated on a perryfot costgg. ,, v y:. r - • ,.�> ",�� t��-fr �y'� ,�I �j._ ¢ r jM1 rr}�� `�. Ti71 �'' � �. �iF/ J HI Ni.},'.'•r� ': "'�� 11 �!`��'��• i-r� ftp �y ; ' V r #. .,"r i ".;F'C�� i .w� r..-,r. ,r�.�W. xa'✓�s s... .!�'.y wra _ .z ,.,OVER_BEACH MORRO BAY PASO ROBLES PISMO BEACH SAN LUIS OBISPO 184,500.00 174,730.00 139,520.00;_'.4 163,000.00., '.i 164,240.00' " n" i 13.03 •. I .134.5628 32.50. :I 87.50 287:30 . 29.1326 - 97.20: 7-.8-0 a 1.31 1 33 I _ 10 00 30.05 t „ 29 ,{ 33 1 0 00 , .99 -- 62. 0' i ;_ _ 125 00 .'i-- - 15.84 «, 1 12.83 . ] _ 25.40 (i erys _ 10 38 33.48-'-- y- ,1 ; 15.33' '"I 25.00 .'!7a 1 62 50 112.13 ,[ of = { 3000. ,, -.` 108:55 YYav, 15.98:'1 25.00 t 37.50 al 90.85 A -- 11.03 7 393 .a J__ 31.25 24.85 ." f 62 50 °: 77.25 ; 9.95` 1218 . '1 tZJ ? 13.50 1 13.4731 682:50 4,-,j ; 1.84 I 3z 3s . i - 1.81' e 9.78 1 3� 1 5.96 I 1 9.56 v of �taw 0.63 -.f 1.80 I 0.63: .; 1 88 .- - 24.2841 f Min , _ rI 1.00` 37.4842lFj a)sl ':1 .i.i 4.00 ,----- '�I 1,255.5543 3s. 5.00 807.00 2,184.13 . ; 921:14.: 1 759.23 " �' ' 1,857.00 . _ 1,242.00 -' i 2184.13 1,284:95'-•:t 1 166.05' 1,3326.00: %V8 580.00 41413 r 437.35 530.61.":.. 11:25. 9 185.75 7.00 .if 15.16 - _ 17.59 ; ' 16.42 2,711:00 i d _ ._ 596.00 513.00...:1 1 - r'------ - 335.00 1 IN _ 116.00 - 129.00 ..:i 2,_042.00 . 212-57.20 2.017:00' _ 900.00 : _ 2 6-32.00d? 364.23 . • 817.0036 1 5,821 74 -- 6,648_00 - 540.00 .' 638.17• 1 _- 219.00 165 00 -_-_ 139.00 -107.00 I = 1,350;00 , . _ 3 694.00 -- 650.12 2,189.00.- ., - - 600.00 16 424.0044 1,936.0027 i I 46.0037`-1 • 1.5-0i •2.73 8i535.115 .. 13,229.24 37,712.86 1.93 > : 1.50 ..i 1..93 ;....i _ _ 1.93' 3,860.00 J 3,000.00 ' 3,860.00;:`"j - 3,860.00 r 1 1 3,000.00;;;. rr 00 253,'500'00 -.-J64,000.'00 250,000:00rrr rr r Vot always applicable. 29.Contract amount+25% 37.AB 717 . " ?t yam• )epends on property and project30.Minor+Temporary use Permits 38.Average of.all impact fees. )lus Direct Cost 31.Lotline adjustment 39.100%of contract+30%for administrative✓3 'Ty .' '" 6300+Direct Cost+24%. 32.(y1/2)valuation of project grading.times - review services ncorporated in Building Permit Fee 50.025 40.See-Design Review , r :onnedion Fee 33.Inclusive in Tract fee,not typical for this size 41.$62+$5.05 per lin h.(assuming 180 lin ft) r.., ;. , ncluded with Development Fees tract 42.$299+1.5%of construction costs free Protection Fee 34 Drainage Fee=$694.00/acre. 43.51422+6.1 %of construction costs Park Development Fee=$509.00/lot 44•$16424 per unit,build 4 moderate) afforable ,.,.kr r" r I..... 6358+cost of plan check P Y t^' Retrofit Fee 35.Included with Improved Plan Check units,or 2 low income units ?;p"'�'C.. ! 1' 4•"�'�'' r" 61282.50+each lot®$102.50 36.Connection Fee Council Meeting 11/21/00 Item 12—Agenda&Staff Report Item 9 Item 10 Agenda&Staff Report Joint Use Committee Bylaws 950 Olive Street Strong Planning Services Cliff Chelquist—SLO PD 444 Higuera Street,Suite 202 Debbie Black San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 4443 Poinsettia San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 John Thomas 4120 Horizon Lane,Suite F Nipool Patel Larry Smyth San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 950 Olive Street 21 Santa Rosa Street,Suite 100 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 Pete Dorn C/o State Farm Ramesh Patel Terry Conner 6275 Palma Avenue C/o Lamplighter Motel 215 Albert Street Atascadero,CA 93422 1604 Monterey Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Item No.4 Naoma Wright Agenda&Staff Report Jane Godfrey 400 Foothill Blvd. Rogoff Appeal re 2958 S.liiguera 1662 Knoll San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Tammy Seale Jules Rogoff Rick May 688 Park Street 1010 Orcutt Road 1635 Knoll Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 930401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Kathy Smith Randy Dettmer Richard Kriet 1592 Higuera Street 614 High Street 206 Marlene Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 Carolyn Goossens—P&R Steve Sales 1721 Garden Street,Suite C San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Rory Livingston San Luis Coastal Unified School District 1499 San Luis Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Council Meeting 11-21-00 Pg.2 Item No.6 ' 4101—4115 Broad Ball,Ball,Williams&Senn do Charles Senn 1141 Parc Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Patti Whelen Cannon Associates 364 Parc Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Serrano Sircle Homeowners Association 672 Serrano Drive,#17 San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 RECEIVED G� ' N O V 7 SLO CITY COUNCIL November 20,2000 The Honorable Mayor,Allen Settle City of San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-3249 Subject: Building Code and Nuisance Violation Enforcement at 55,61,and 73 Broad Street("The Villages of San Luis Obispo") Dear Mayor Settle: Thank you for your phone conversation with me on November 16,2000, regarding Westpac Investment Inc.'s ongoing code and nuisance violations at their 55,61 and 73 Broad Street commercial restaurant and housing facilities campus,known as The Villages,as well as the City's violation enforcement difficulties. Thank you also for acknowledging that we have been extremely reasonable in raising the issues associated with these ongoing code and nuisance violations,in numerous letters to the City Planning Department,the City Code Enforcement personnel and you during the last year and more. As you requested,below is a summary of the existing violations as well as the mitigations that we request to remedy these violations We request that you and the City Council direct the responsible City departments to enforce the City ordinances that citizens depend on for protection of our property rights,public health,safety and welfare, within this next month If the City departments cannot enforce the ordinances and effect appropriate remedies,we respectfully request that you and the City Council consider a revocation hearing for the use permit at 55,61 and 73 Broad Streets. Commercial Kitchen Facility at 73 Broad Street Problem: This kitchen is being used to service all three multi-story buildings on The Villages campus. It is located against the creekside and fronts our bedrooms at Serrano Sircle. Apparently,this area appeared in the City approved plans as an office,not as a kitchen. Several violations are occurring associated with the current use of this commercial kitchen. They are: • The latches door which faces our bedrooms and the creek is left open and industrial kitchen noises,including dishes clattering,dish washers running,exhaust fans running,stafftallang loudly over the equipment noises during meal preparation occur from around 6 AM till after 10:30 PM, seven days a week This use noise is sufficient to wake our residents early and prevent our going to sleep at a decent hour. • The emergency exit door that is located next to the kitchen door is left propped open by a mop bucket or broom most of the time. The area in front of the emergency exit is populated with kitchen food racks,delivery carts,the 73 Broad staff break table and chairs,trash boxes,and other debris. • Kitchen equipment,such as large pots,racks and other items are regularly cleaned in the emergency exit area This area.fronts the creek and our bedrooms. The cleaning detergents,water and other debris are regularly washed into the riparian area and the staff routinely yells among themselves to be heard over the outdoor scrubbing of kitchen equipment • Kitchen staff have been observed throwing garbage into the creek more than once. • Kitchen debris is ending up in the creek—including food and paper copies of the 73 Broad Street printed menus for the week Page 1 of 5 Serrano Sirde Homeowners Association 672 Serrano Drive,#17 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 • Delivery to and from this kitchen,because of the rear door being used as the delivery entrance, invohres trucks and carts being regularly double-parked in the fire lane neat to 73 Broad Street • Delivery to and from this kitchen also involves trucks and carts being unable to maneuver in the narrow fire lane and results in drivers regularly backing into the area running backup bells and horns for several minutes as they negotiate the narrow lanes between 61 and 73 Broad Street. • The 200 Ib. refrigeration condensers,designed for being mounted on roofs,were instead installed on the ground next to the back kitchen door. The noise cycling on and off from these condensers trespasses our property line and,many times this past year,has kept several of us up late into the night,as well as wakening us from sound sleeps. • Because of an earlier letter to you,the City staff accepted mitigation from Westpac to build a mechanical equipment building around these condensers,rather than install them on the roof as designed The WestPacdesigned mechanical equipment building is not working—the door to the mechanical equipment building must remain open at all times because the condensers are not getting the proper air circulation. It is our understanding that because of the new mechanical equipment building the condensers became too hot and shut down,thereby shutting down the refrigeration for the kitchen at 73 Broad and creating a potential health hazard. We understand that this has happened more than once and refrigeration and air conditioning specialists have advised Westpac that the condensers are not designed to be placed inside buildings,but are designed to be placed on the roofs,to ensure appropriate levels of air circulation around them and prevent overheating. • Exhaust fan noise—several fans associated with the kitchen and laundry facilities at 73 Broad Street,including a new fan placed on the mechanical equipment building that was erected to answer the fan noise violations created by the condensers,are responsible for the ongoing noise violations. Solution: Listed below are the mitigations we request associated with the kitchen at 73 Broad Street • The refrigeration condensers be relocated to the roof of 73 Broad Street,as designed. • The emergency door for 73 Broad Street be kept closed and alarmed and not used as a secondary delivery door for the staff at 73 Broad Street • The staff rest area be relocated to the interior of the building,so that the emergency exit is not impeded and the temptation to throw debris into the creek is eliminated. • The kitchen door be closed at all times,unless there is an emergency. • No equipment will be cleaned,washed down or maintained in the emergency exit area or near the riparian areas at any time. All cleaning and maintenance associated with 73 Broad Street be handled imernally to the building. • The building exhaust fans,including the kitchen and laundry fans,be moved to the roof of 73 Broad Street. • All deliveries to 73 Broad Street,including those for the kitchen,occur at the northwest entrance of the building,accessed by the driveway between 73 Broad Street and 55 Broad Street • All Westpac staff,including their vendors and contractors be regularly advised to conduct business in a manner that does not violate City noise ordinances and the riparian area. General Noise Violations Problem: New roof-mounted mechanical equipment at 61 Broad Street operates 24 hours a day,7 days a week,creating noise violations that trespass our property lines affecting our bedrooms and living areas. Solution: Install an acoustical parapet around the mechanical equipment at 61 Broad Street that will absorb and shield the sound Problem: WestPac Delivery Cart Noises. There are several problems with noise from the golf-cart sized delivery carts used by Westpac: Page 2 of 5 Serrano Sircle Homeowners Association 672 Serrano Drive,#17 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 1. The carts have back up horns installed and the area around 61 and 73 Broad in which these carts are used is so narrow that the cart operators routinely drive these carts in reverse all over the campus rather than try to maneuver in the narrow spaces of the driveways,cart paths and parking lots. 2. The carts drivers have been provided with hand operated clown horns to alert pedestrians, however the cart drivers routinely use these clown horns for horsing around and their own amusement 3. The carts are often used in conjunction with a towed trailer that has a metal tailgate,which,when the staff opens to load or unload the trailer,they drop the metal gate to the ground with a loud bang. The staff uses this towed trailer at all hours of the day and night Solation: Several solutions can be easily implemented to resolve the noise violations associated with the operation of the delivery carts. 1. Disconnect the back up horns on the delivery carts. This is a practice that is used with similar carts at Cal Poly. The visibility available with these karts is 360 degrees and it should be easy for the drivers to watch where they are going,especially since they are already in the general practice of driving these carts in reverse. 2. Remove the hand operated clown horns from the cart drivers. 3. Acoustically treat the delivery cart trailer so that it doesn't violate the noise ordinance and create loud bangs when the tailgate is lowered. Traffic and Pathways Design and Use Contributing to Noise Violations Problem: The existing emergency access wooden bridge between 61 Broad Street and the new building of 73 Broad Street is routinely used for commercial deliveries at 61 Broad Street that include carpet cleaning trucks,plumbing maintenance trucks linen and laundry delivery trucks,package delivery services trircks, the Post Office delivery truck,and the Westpac delivery carts. Each time a vehicle of any size crosses the wooden bridge it creates a noise that sounds like"nearby thunder"as described by a visitor to one of our homes in Serrano Sircle. Solution: Pave the wooden bridge with asphalt to deaden the noise. Problem: Vehicle access to 61 Broad Street is poorly designed It routinely creates noise violations and safety hazards. 1. Pedestrian sidewalks among the three buildings—including a sidewalk which does not appear on the development plans submitted to the City and is located between 61 Broad Street and the wooden bridge —are routinely used by the Westpac delivery carts as a vehicle cart path 2. Commercial vehicles entering the small parking lot behind 61 Broad Sued and next to our bedrooms routinely create loud noise going over the wooden bridge that is the only access route for these vehicles to this parking lot This parking lot is so small that commercial vehicles routinely cannot maneuver to get out of the parking lot and resort to backing out in reverse over the bridge and out the fire lane.In addition,commercial vehicles in this area have impeded fire and emergency vehicles and personnel answering emergency calls to 61 Broad Street on at least two occasions. Solution: 1. Restrict the WestPac delivery cart operations to the asphalted driveways,fire lanes and parking lots. 2. Restrict the WestPac delivery carts to use an existing bridge between the 61 Broad Street and 55 Broad Street buildings to access the northwest doors of 61 Broad Street for all pickups and Page 3 of 5 -Serrano Sircle Homeowners Association 672 Serrano Drive,#17 San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 deliveries. They should not use the small parking lot between 61 Broad Street and our property line for pickups and deliveries. 3. Restrict all commercial deliveries for 61 Broad Street to be received at either 55 or 73 Broad Street,or delivered to 61 Broad Street via the parking lot on the northwest corner of The Villages campus,facing Palomar and Ramona Streets. No commercial vehicles,including buses and vans, should be allowed into the parking lot between 61 Broad Street and our property. 4. Signage on the wooden bridge that provides the only access to the back parking lot between 61 Broad Street and our property should state that no commercial vehicles are allowed to cross the wooden bridge or enter the paridng lot. 5. The small parking lot between 61 Broad Street and our property should be used only for short- term,handicapped or resident paridng. It should be so designated by signage and it should be enforced. Garbage and Recycling Collection Violations Problem:. There are several garbage and recycling violations occurring at The Villages. They include: I. At 73 Broad Street,garbage bins are routinely blocking the fire lane. 2. There is no recycling occurring at 73 Broad Street—the garbage is routinely mixed in all the garbage bins. 3. Garbage is being thrown into the riparian area. 4. Often,garbage is stacked loosely against the building and garbage bins for days at a time,being loaded into the bins only the night before collection is to occur. 5. Delivery carts that are used to haul food as well as dirty and clean laundry,are routinely used to haul bagged trash from all three multi-story residential buildings to be dumped into the garbage bins associated with 73 Broad Street 6. Garbage truck personnel servicing-the three buildings are collecting the garbage from the bins at 73 Broad Street at least twice a week and routinely cannot muscle any one of the bins into the gated enclosure that had been designed to hold one bin,apparently because the gated area to the enclosure is too narrow. T Garbage trucks collecting the garbage from the bins at 73 Broad Street during the early morning hours cannot turn around in the too-narrow fire lane and routinely must back out of the area after collection. This prooess takes a few minutes every time the pick-ups are made with backup horns blaring the entire time. Solution: Relocate the garbage bins for all the buildings in The Villages campus to the existing common garbage collection facility located in The Villages parking lot that faces Palomar and Ramona. There is plenty of space in this parking lot for bins to be designated for each building,and each aspect of collection- -recycling,garbage and green debris. Also,there is space for the garbage,recycling and green waste trucks to maneuver during collection without having to resort to backing up. The last benefit to this. location is that the waste collection trucks will not be blocking the fire lanes,if they use the Palomar/Ramona parking lot garbage facility for collection. Ughting Violations Problem: The new lighting design at 61 and 73 Broad Street has created extensive glare,light trespass and barsh illumination. The tight pollution trespasses our properly lines and it is not an exaggeration to state that we can read books at night in our bedrooms using only the trespassing light from 61 and 73 Broad Street In addition,it is our understanding that the ill-advised adjustments to the lighting design that are in Page 4 of 5 Serrano Sircle Homeowners Associatim, 672 Serrano Drive,#17 San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 violation of City ordinances have also created safety hazards for the senior residents at 61 and 73 Broad Street- Solution: treetSolution: We are willing to hire a lighting design consultant to create a plan and specification for the Westpac development group on the appropriate lighting solution. We expect the plan and specification to describe fixtures that will adequately address the specific lighting design requirements while preventing light pollution and trespass. We are willing to pay for the consultation and specification. We expect that the solution can be developed and implemented in a short time frame at WestPac's cost. I regret that this is such a long letter. I thank you for taking the time to read it in its entirety. Truly,if the violations were less this would have been a much shorter letter. With your and the City Council's help,I hope that the City departments can effect quick remedies to these ongoing violations that meet our needs as well as the needs of the residents at 55,61 and 73 Broad Street. Sincerely, 9'0 Bradford D.Bosch President, Serrano Sircle Homeowners Association Cc: City Council Members,City of San Luis Obispo John Shoals,Associate Planner,City of San Luis Obispo Page 5 of 5 Council Meeting 11/21/00 t tt� Item 12—Agenda&Staff Report Item 9 Item 10 Agenda&Staff.Report Joint Use Committee Bylaws 950 Olive Street t• Strong Planning Services Cliff Chelquist—SLO PD 444 Higuera Street,Suite 202 Debbie Black San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 4443 Poinsettia San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 John Thomas 4120 Horizon Lane,Suite F Nipool Patel Larry Smyth San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 950 Olive Street 21 Santa Rosa Street,Suite 100 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 Pete Dorn C/o State Farm Ramesh Patel Terry Conner 6275 Palma Avenue C/o Lamplighter Motel 215 Albert Street Atascadero,CA 93422 1604 Monterey Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 t• Item No.4 Naoma Wright Agenda&Staff Report Jane Godfrey 400 Foothill Blvd. Ro'goff Appeal re 2958 S.Higuera 1662 Knoll San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Tammy Seale Jules Rogoff Rick May 688 Park Street 1010 Orcutt Road 1635 Knoll Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 930401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 ri Kathy Smith Randy Dettmer Richard Kriet 1592 Higuera Street 614 High Street 206 Marlene Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93405 Carolyn Goossens—P&R Steve Sales 1721 Garden Street,Suite C San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 ■ Rory Livingston San Luis Coastal Unified School District 1499 San Luis Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 BU*lcil Meetiie 11=21-u�5"g.2 = . Item No.6 4101 4115 Broad Ball,Ball,Williams&S-enn do Chailes Senn 1141 Pacific Street San Luis Obispo,;CA 93401 Patti Whclen Cannon Associates 364 Pacific Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 A MEETL ._ AGENDA Higuera Motors DATE ITEM #= 2968 So.fflp a St. San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 805-545-0992 Dear Council Members: My name is Fred Castro and I own Higuera Motors with my uncle.We have 4 mechanics working now. sometimes 5.We bought the shop from Ferdinan Khun in March of 1999. He was there for 12 years. We do smog and safety checks and all types of repair on foreign and domestic cars and trucks. When we bough the shop all of the customers came in the front of the building.This is still the same now because the lifts in the shop are facing to the back so that the cars enter from Higuera St. and leave out the back door.This works good because when the car is finished it can be moved into the back going in one direction and the owner can drive out onto Higuera St.When a car is finished fast sometimes the customers back out of the building.Mr.Rogoff said this is no good. I know it is not the safe way to do it. Chu space is narrow but long.The front and rear doors are used everyday and are very important for our business.We have some cars on jacks when we work on front ends and rear ends.Some time wait. ing for parts and doing the job takes 2-3 days.We don't move the cars.The cars stay in the shop on jacks until the job is done.We can drive past the cars to get in and out. Mr. Rogoff said you want to close the front door.We cannot tum the cars around in the shop.There is not room for turning.We have many tool boxes, smog test machine,air conditioning machine,welder, drums for recycling oil,radiator flush machine, brake machine,press machine,parts and jacks that take up a lot of the shop. Mr. Rogoff said that he is trying to have the customers come in from the back and go out the front.This is o.k.We can tum our lifts around to face the front. But it would not work to back out or tum around with many cars in the shop.They can go out thew door like Mr. Rogoff says.We will tell our cus- tomers no more parking in front. Now you g to the back and park.We also don't want to close the door because we need the doors open to lett the exhaust from the cars that are running. I saw the drawing of the new building. It looks very nice.We would have a nice building when it is done. My father owns A and D Automotive on Higuera St. He has only one way in and the same way out.This does not work good for him. He has to back up the cars into the shop to work on them.Then he needs to move 4 or 5 cars out of the way to get the car out.That's why he is moving to another place. I don't want to move. Please let me keep two doors in my shop. Mr_ Rogoff said a meeting will be at City Hall on Tuesday at 7:00 and 1 should come. I will be at this meeting. F.Castro C) ner Higuera Motors 0: RECEIVED ❑POLICE CHF i TEk. ❑REC DIA fI W 2 n 2000 [30 UTIL DIR ❑ 0 Pegs DiR_ SLO CITY COUNCIL A AI 1 star . . P pplianc�� s Dear City Council Members: I have been in the used appliance repair and sales business in San Luis Obispo for the past 4 years. In May of 1999 I relocated to the back of 2958 So. Higuera St. behind the Second Hand store. Since Mr. Rogoff has purchased the property, he gave me the opportunity to move my business to the front side of the building at 2978 So. Higuera St. I have been located here for the last 10 months. Since moving to a frontage location it is apparent that it has been the best thing I ever did. My business doubled in the first two months of the move. I now have a visible location with signage and a small but real showroom. I understand that Mr. Rogoff, as a condition of his remodeling plans, may be required to close off the garage door that I presently use for access to my business. Should this happen, it will be impossible for me to continue to be in business. I rely on the garage door access in order to move appliances in and out of my shop since I have no access from the rear of the building. I have a lift gate on the back of my truck and need to have access to the front of the shop to load and unload appliances for drop off and delivery. I have used the space between the building and the bike lane because it is convenient. I know that the condition is not the best, but it is difficult for myself and customers to park in the back of the property while Mr. Rogoff has demolition and extensive clean-up going on. There have been trucks and tractors moving in and out of the property almost every week loading trash in dumpsters and dump trucks. There is a lot of dust and dirt kicked up by this work and I don't want to get in the way of the clean-up. Once the new parking lot is put in and with the right signage, my customers will be able to park on the side of the building and walk around to my shop without a problem. I will also be able to park my truck in a designated spot in the back. I have invested a considerable amount of money in this move and really can't afford nor do I want to move again. I would like to stay in this location and understand that there will be no parking in front of my shop for my truck or my customers. I will abide by the no parking restriction in the front of the building and make sure my customers do not block the bike lane or park on the side walk Mr. Rogoff has informed me that this will be a condition of our lease agreement and failure to follow the no parking restriction will be cause to terminate my rental agreement. E>> Thank you, [FIECE—IV 0 V 7 1CITY GUNCiL Dale Craig Owner of All Star Appliances 16 0 2978 So. Higuero Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 • (805) 541-2705 I MALIBU MOTORS 2923 S.San Luis ObispObispa o, CA 93401 (805)541-6343 Date: 16 November, 2000 To: Jules Rogoff for presentation to the City Council From: Roy Weigold Re: Support of San Luis Auto Center and Storage of cars at your site Dear Jules, As you know,in the automotive sales business there are times when a dealer acquires used cars that are in need of many different types of repairs in order for us to have them in " sales ready condition". This reconditioning can consist of any or all of the following A current smog certificate prior to offer of sale as mandated by the State of California. A safety check of the foot and parking brakes, steering, windshield wipers, hom, lights, turn signals, seat belts, door locks,window controls and horn. Everything from tune-ups and minor repairs such as valve cover gasket replacement to major repairs such as en- nine and transmission replacement,and the typical timing belts, c.v. joints and catalytic converter replacement. Windshield repair or replacement Paint-less dent removal and or touch up paint Stereo repair or replacement Upholstery repair or replacement Detailing When we are in need of any of the above services it requires two people to drop off a car (one to drive the repair vehicle and a car and driver to transport the first driver back) at each shop to have a particular repair preformed. Then another car and driver to pick up the repair car. Quite a logistic nightmare for a small business operator. Your concept of having a center with auto related rental spaces for these small shops in one convenient center is a great idea. We would be able to drop off a car and have all repairs and services done at one location and not have the need to move our cars across town from shop to shop wasting gas and manpower. Best of luck in yo orts; Roy Weigold �.S.Thanks for 1 u store ome of our vehicles at your site. Storage in the city is expensive and very hard to find.We will mov em a you need the room for your project _ FOV E;.: " •E N - ML'11N AGENDA DATE ITEM #= ��°►ii�!i�P '-COUNCIL MEMO DUM November 20, 2000 TO: City Council VIA: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer FROM: John Moss, Utilities Directo M Dave Pierce, Water Project anagerj SUBJECT: WATER REUSE PROJECT—APPROVE PRELIMINARY DESIGN November 21, 2000, Council Meeting—Agenda Item#3 Attached are three maps that will be part of the presentation for the Council Meeting on November 21, 2000. They separate the project to more clearly identify that work which is being recommended at this time and that which could be part of future phases. • This first shows the demands and the location of existing facilities including the Water Reclamation Facility and the abandon Unocal pipeline • The second shows the project that is being proposed for approval at this time. The pipelines are being constructed with the capacity to serve the additional customers that might be added should those pipelines shown on the next map be constructed at a later date. The pumping and storage facilities will be constructed so that they could be expanded in the future. • The third shows the project that could be constructed with additional phases to serve the Sinsheimer area and the Downtown and Cal Poly areas. Councilman Romero suggested that we circulate these additional maps to clarify the proposed action. Attachments: 1. Map of Demand for Recycled Water 2. Map of Alternative 1 —Proposed 3. Map of Alternative 1 —Future Potential E:r � • [� "�D1R Attach Demand for Recycled Water 71! ;� -•, 1 ; it . i i A. ' �" ,•`^tet '�� I" I!.' ,. .'L �\ !. i �. Gyp. It c .20 l 200 0 t0 water Reckmitlon' Facility7 '' .91 i City Of Sail LUIS ompO: �. Posed Pump Statlorr —- — % and _.. .. ._ . ........................ . ; CRY umrrs LEGEND �i ■a m a a a m Abandoned Unocal Pipeline Proposed Use Areas Possible Future Use Areas 20 Annual Consumption In Acre-Feet future Attachment Alternative 1 = Proposed rte, ,• ,� i'•�' .;... lr 12 40 .- ..� •200 a _i ' Face } crty of san Luis omspo. �P° and��Stanar� G .... .._. .......... ..... ............_._ crnums i f LEGEND ■■■■ ■■a Abandoned Unocal Pipefine Proposed Use Areas Initial Project Plpefine _ _...._ PcSSlble FUWM Use Areas -Potential for Groundwater Exdmnpe ■ra m Groundwater Exchange 20 Annual Consuffq*w In Acre-Feet-Future Pipeline Attach Alternative 1 - Future Potential •l-_'I -tea--: (�\ 1 .� - i .rj J:i ..�- v �,'r r •y Proposed Reservok 51. ' .7 i 20. . 6 1 1� 1- : _ 200 ! 40 20 f R901amatlOn —— `C-1 1 CILLI Of Sa►il LUIS OBISpO Proposed Pump Staflor� , and Sbr f LEGEND ■■ ■■■■o Abandoned Unocal Pipeline Proposed Use Areae i Initial Project Pipeline -_S Posdbb Future Use Areae m =sm=I Slnehelmer Area Pipeline —Potential for Groundwater Exdnernge ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ r Oowntami Cel Poly pipeline ri■■m Groundwater ExcJanpe 20 Annual Consumption in Acre-Feet-Future Pipeline llalson wpojA LHINU • DATE ITEM # November 21, 2000 TO: Council Colleagues FROM: John Ewan �1r_� SUBJECT: Downtown Lociation At the Downtown Association meeting of 11/14/00 the Board expressed concern about the reopening of Osos Street in time for the Christmas Parade. Sixty-three people attended the Strategic Plan meeting on November 8`h, not as high as anticipated. There was a repetitive theme throughout the meeting and focus groups of design and look—not economic needs. .Consultants felt that people needed to express their concerns, but hopefully move the discussion toward economics and away from parking during interviews and second town meetings. The Strategic.Plan Survey was mailed to 500 businesses with a 10% return rate. That was a good rate, but the project was expensive and it was hoped that the response would have been greater. The new Downtown Magazine is looking great. It debuted on November 20`h and is being mailed to all single families in the city. The Prado Day Center fund raising campaign letter is ready for mailing. It is hoped that the campaign will raise$30,000-40,000. An inspection for facility maintenance will be done to identify needs. The spare change program has ground to a halt with six jars in the community. The $oard spent time brainstorming a promotion effort. The Mardi Gras Committee reviewed new actions: The Tuesday parade and intolerance of alcohol during the event were discussed. Guidelines for City portable restroom use were questioned. Tom Swem was appointed president-elect to the Downtown Assn. Board, JE:ss L C ._•r C . i pr% ❑UTiLD ' f7 ❑PE�3 GI's tim son REpolzt • November 21, 2000 MEETING AGENDA DATE 2! ITEM #��-2 � TO: Council Colleagues FROM: John Ewan SUBJECT: Air Pollution Control District The Air Pollution Control District meeting on 11/15/00 was devoted to the disbursement of mitigation funds. Diesel fuel (700,000 gallons) was burned to clean up 135,000 gallons of spilled fuel at Avila Beach. The air quality mitigation funds to offset this air pollution were disbursed as listed in the attached. JE:ss Attachment Irlimme '.� ❑CDD DIR 0 FIN Dill EY ❑FIEc CHIEF RV D�Fj ❑ ❑POLICE cHF L� ❑REC DIR ❑UTIL DIR PERS DIR 0 0 "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O N O O A C 69 •- N N O V n kn O O b F 69 N R69 ..-. M 00 • W 69 6n 69 64 69 69 69 Ol 69 O O O A > C fiH O 69 N M W13 O U L 'flL., 6N9 N 00 �Y r kn T N V5 ra 00 Q� 61Y Vf 69 b9 Ff3 Uz Z Z Z O Z O z z CD C, be 69 z Z O Cl a b .MM.. O A3 7 v M O% xw 0 0 0 0 0 O o O o 0 0 0 o O v m o 0 0 0 0 kn o 0 0 o O O0 O o Ln L O O O O kn 7 O O O N O O �o O O r- vl %f O 7 Izlr lr fl Ci O t- fig .•-� N n N 6R O ON O (-Q• .N+ •--� M r� O V C 6R N N R v N 69 M Fsi M r- V y w 69 69 69 N 64 69 6R 6R 69 69 'I 6� 69 69 L en ..n Ay h U G N r �'; 7 ri N ^ �D CD N 4 ITN p°qw WCC A a O � N QC O O O O O O O OCD O G II ON O 00 O O O O O O O O O a+ bD U U 4e9 6°`9 6M4 O N bs N NN h N cq N ON O N O . W u A 69 n 6AR 6NA 69 6A 6A 6A A 6A Q Y • a °oa w � V N N O+ 7 7 b \O �O D\ N \0 O M 7 a v1 \6 V M 7 N f+1 a7 M N M .N M M O a Q a �cl p,Q U oo m e^n bo m m ' o b a b o o o a a � e u r _ d R O a Er v m m u o o a = sto QQ •� a v O e x C o z 0 Q!' ° Cz CL y o m E, U Cs D o ti o � gm a eq tt p = h d p0 a± m o v v i 4 e 9 ° c 4 -� U e Z m ° e v oow 5 °� °c ° u r a o o ° c u C m CL[� '�-�'^ E 1 T r b y CS. a' 7 .i z y 4, °� Q •i CL. PG ' r'p5 0 ° n e .>° j° y c r °�' o o n O ° p ` d c z R7 � '� � Ej 04 c a 5 aQi $ n e p o s o m h o ; -� ° ' U `4 Q r 41 UqC i `, a m a y s � a -� p �L b A es '° id r 'o x ° d a v 21 m v� a v ❑ r °moo y a oUz ° y api � rU W � 00] oa o oU � O oW aUw00 m cc �Pa � Q �. � Q `.O `.0 `a `.W `.0 M No tnI�jiLl by M 4n 3 ° 00 a00 4 O O Q Q ¢ Q Q [ fyQ Q Q Q z°