HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-02-2014 C6 Adopt County Integrated Regional Water Mgmt PlanCity of San Luis Obispo, Council Agenda Report, Meeting Date, Item Number
FROM: Carrie Mattingly, Utilities Director
Prepared By: Wade Horton, Utilities Deputy Director, Water
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a resolution adopting the 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water
Management (IRWM) Plan and find that the Project is statutorily exempt from Section 21000 et
seq. of the California Public Resources Code (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15262 of the CEQA
Guidelines (Feasibility and Planning Studies).
DISCUSSION
Background
In 2002, Senate Bill 1672 established the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Act.
The purpose of the Act is to promote collaborative, integrated management of water resources on
a localized regional basis. Since that time, California voters have passed a series of propositions,
establishing and funding efforts under the State’s IRWM Program. These propositions
authorized the Legislature to appropriate grant funds for IRWM plans and projects, and to
establish eligibility requirements. The IRWM Program is administered by the State’s
Department of Water Resources (DWR).
In November 2012, the City signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) along with 23
other local agencies, including the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control District (Flood
Control District), the six other cities in the county, Community Services Districts, Resource
Conservation Districts, and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s), who support the
multiple water resource and regional coordination efforts. The Flood Control District is the lead
agency under the MOU, and collectively, the agencies are referred to as the Regional Water
Management Group (Attachment 3). The Flood Control District is also responsible for
development and implementation of San Luis Obispo County Region’s IRWM Plan. The plan
was initially developed and adopted by multiple agencies in the county in 2005 and updated in
2007.
In order to continue to receive state funding, the IRWM Plan needed to be updated to comply
with the Proposition 84 2011 Implementation and 2012 Planning Grant Agreements and to meet
DWR revised eligibility requirements. In December 2012, the Flood Control District Board of
Supervisors approved a contract with GEI Consultants, Inc., to update the IRWM Plan. The plan
update is now complete.
Sept. 2, 2014
C6
C6 - 1
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Page 2
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Content
The IRWM Plan was developed in accordance with State standards and with extensive
participation from the Regional Water Management Group, the Water Resources Advisory
Committee and the general public. The IRWM Plan, which is quite long, is on file with the
County Clerk’s office, and available at www.slocountywater.org by clicking on the IRWM
button. The Executive Summary for the IRWM Plan is in the Council Office for review and is
also available online at the Utilities website as well.
Through its governance, goals and objectives and project review process sections, the IRWM
Plan provides a united framework among the region’s stakeholders for sustainable water resource
management. The IRWM Plan also provides a “one stop shop” for information on the water
resources of the county, and related planning and project efforts. The IRWM Plan is intended to
be a “living” document, with the ability to update information and the project list within it as
needed. A detailed discussion of IRWM Plan implementation and update efforts are described in
Sections J (Plan Implementation and Monitoring) and Q (Plan Implementation and Maintenance
Activities).
Next Step
One of the eligibility requirements of the IRWM Program is that an IRWM Plan be formally
accepted, as evidenced by a resolution or other written documentation, by the governing bodies
of each agency that is part of the Regional Water Management Group responsible for the
development of the Plan and have responsibility for implementation of the Plan (California
Water Code Section 10543). Approving the attached resolution (Attachment 1) adopting the
2014 San Luis Obispo County IRWM Plan for the Flood Control District and the County will
satisfy the state requirement. The MOU for the Regional Water Management Group is attached
to the resolutions since the IRWM Plan needs to demonstrate the governance under which the
regional efforts are conducted.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
As the IRWM Plan is a planning study that inventories water resources date, strategies, and
potential projects and programs, it is statutorily exempt from California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15262 of the CEQA Guidelines (Feasibility and Planning
Studies). Future implementation of any identified projects or programs would be subject to
CEQA review. Attachment 2 is the Notice of Exemption which will be filed by the City of San
Luis Obispo after the adoption of the plan.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. Any identified IRWM Plan
projects related to the City will be brought to the Council for consideration prior to any funding
commitments.
C6 - 2
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Page 3
ALTERNATIVE
Do not adopt the 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management
(IRWM) Plan. Staff does not recommend this action as it limits the City’s ability to be eligible
for grant funding.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution adopting IWRM Plan
2. Notice of Exemption
3. Attachment 1 Exhibit A: San Luis Obispo MOU IRWM Program Participants
4. Executive Summary for the IRWM Plan
AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE COUNCIL OFFICE
Executive Summary of the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
T:\Council Agenda Reports\2014\2014-09-02\Adopt County Integrated Regional Water Mtg Plan (Mattingly-Horton)
C6 - 3
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO._________(2014 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING THE 2014 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND
FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM SECTION 21000 ET SEQ.
OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE PURSUANT TO SECTION 15262 OF
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the State of California has established an Integrated Regional Water Management
grant program pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and
Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Public Resources Code Section 75001 et seq.) (also known as
Proposition 84); and
WHEREAS, the Regional Water Management Group for the San Luis Obispo County Region as
of the date of this resolution consists of agencies including the City of San Luis Obispo, that have signed
a Memorandum of Understanding (Exhibit A) and are listed in Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the concepts, direction and approach to water resources management embodied in
the State’s Integrated Regional Water Management program guidelines closely match those of the San
Luis Obispo County Region; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan was
initially developed and adopted by multiple agencies in the County including the City of San Luis
Obispo in 2005 and updated in 2007; and
WHEREAS, an update to the 2007 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan is needed in order to effectively and efficiently integrate the region’s water resources
management planning objectives and implementation strategies in the following five key areas: Water
Supply, Groundwater Monitoring and Management, Flood Management, Ecosystems and Watershed,
and Water Resources Management and Communications; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has
coordinated with the Regional Water Management Group to produce the 2014 San Luis Obispo County
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan in accordance with 2012 State standards; and
WHEREAS, the 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
C6 - 4
Attachment 1
identifies goals, objectives, strategies and projects designed to improve regional water supply reliability,
water recycling, water conservation, water quality improvement, stormwater capture and management,
flood management, recreation and access, wetland enhancement and creation, and environmental and
habitat protection and improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has reviewed the 2014 San Luis Obispo County
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan and has determined that the Plan is exempt from Section
21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act) pursuant
to Section 21150 of the California Environmental Quality Act, and Guidelines Section 15262 because
the Plan is a planning study which identifies potential projects, programs, and policies for possible
future actions, and includes possible actions, subject to future adoption and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1: The 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the
San Luis Obispo County Region is hereby adopted, and Utilities Department staff is hereby authorized
and directed to implement actions consistent with participating in updates to the plan on a five-year
cycle as a Regional Water Management Group Member as described within the plan.
SECTION 2: The adoption of the 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan for the San Luis Obispo County Region is hereby determined to be exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 21150 of Section 21150
of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15262 of the State California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines.
Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by _______________________, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2014.
____________________________________
Mayor Jan Marx
ATTEST:
C6 - 5
Attachment 1
____________________________________
Anthony Mejia
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
C6 - 6
Exhibit A
San Luis Obispo County Region Integrated Regional Water Management Program Participants
Memorandum of Understanding
C6 - 7
Exhibit B
Memorandum of Understanding Signatories for
San Luis Obispo County Region IRWM Participants
Agency or Organization
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
California Men's Colony
Cambria Community Services District
Central Coast Salmon Enhancement
City of Arroyo Grande
City of Grover Beach
City of Morro Bay
City of Paso Robles
City of Pismo Beach
City of San Luis Obispo
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
Heritage Ranch Community Services District
Land Conservancy
Los Osos Community Services District
Morro Bay National Estuary Program
Nipomo Community Services District
Oceano Community Services District
Templeton Community Services District
San Miguel Community Services District
San Simeon Community Services District
S&T Mutual Water Company
Upper Salinas - Las Tablas Resource Conservation District
C6 - 8
Notice of Exemption
To: Office of Planning and Research From: City of San Luis Obispo
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Community Development Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249
County Clerk
County of San Luis Obispo Filing Not Required
1144 Monterey Street, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
Project Title: 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
Project Location - Specific: Citywide
Project Location - City: San Luis Obispo Project Location - County: San Luis Obispo
Description of Project:
The 2014 San Luis Obispo Integrated Water Management (IRWM) Plan evaluates multiple water resources management
strategies to meet water resources needs throughout the SLO County IRWM region. The 2014 Plan includes: 1)
documentation of water resources jurisdictions and their planning and management efforts; 2) a compilation of various
agencies water resources data and an analysis of current and future water supply and demand; 3) an analysis of potential
water management strategies to address possible water resources needs; and 4) an inventory of potential future projects
and policies to address water resources needs throughout the SLO County IRWM region.
Name of Public Agency Approving the Project: City of San Luis Obispo
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out the Project: City of San Luis Obispo
Exempt Status (check one):
Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268;
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15301 Class 1 - Existing Facilities
Statutory Exemptions. State code number: Article 18, Section 15262
Reasons why project is exempt:
The 2014 San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan is a planning study which identifies
potential projects, programs, and policies for possible future actions, and includes possible actions, subject to future
adoption and approval. Thus, this project is considered statutorily exempt from CEQA in accordance with Article 18,
Statutory Exemptions, Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies.
Lead Agency
Contact Person: Ron Munds, Utilities Services Manager Area Code/Telephone/Ext. (805) 781-7258
If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No
Signature:______________________________ Date: ___________________
Title: Community Development Director
C6 - 9
Signed by Lead Agency Date Received for Filing at OPR: __________
Signed by Applicant Revised April 1997
C6 - 10
Attachment 3
C6 - 11
C6 - 12
C6 - 13
C6 - 14
C6 - 15
C6 - 16
C6 - 17
C6 - 18
San Luis Obispo County
2014 Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan
Executive Summary
JULY 2014
2014 IRWM P L A N
S A N L U I S O BISPO CO
U
N
T
Y
Attachment 4
C6 - 19
II
Executive Summary
Various agencies, non-governmental organizaƟ ons, and
advisory groups acƟ vely parƟ cipate in the management
of water resources available to San Luis Obispo County
(County). The San Luis Obispo County Flood Control
and Water ConservaƟ on District (District) was formed
in 1945 to implement projects and programs to manage
and conserve water resources within the County. The
District, in coordinaƟ on with the San Luis Obispo County
Region’s Regional Water Management Group (RWMG)
and the Water Resources Advisory CommiƩ ee (WRAC),
has been acƟ ng as the Lead Agency responsible for
development and implementaƟ on of the Region’s
Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Plan.
The 2014 San Luis Obispo County IRWM Plan idenƟ fi es
the current challenges facing the County and provides
the framework for these agencies to work together to
address these challenges for a more sustainable water
management future.
The purpose of this 2014 San Luis Obispo County IRWM
Plan ExecuƟ ve Summary is to provide a high level
overview of how the IRWM process is being used to
address the challenges and to provide a framework for
ongoing water resources management in the future.
Contents
Water Management in
San Luis Obispo County ........................1
San Luis Obispo IRWM Region ............11
Plan Update Process ..........................24
2014 IRW M P L A N
S A N L U I S O B ISPO CO
U
N
T
Y
Attachment 4
C6 - 20
1
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
San Luis Obispo
County is located
between San Francisco
and Los Angeles on
the Central Coast of
California.
Water Management in
San Luis Obispo County
The IRWM Plan was iniƟ ally developed and adopted by mulƟ ple agencies in the county in 2005,
and updated in 2007. The 2014 IRWM Plan was developed with the help of volunteer agencies
and stakeholders over a two year period following a public process that included over 20 meet-
ings and subregional workshops throughout the County, and was sponsored in part by a Depart-
ment of Water Resources (DWR) ProposiƟ on 84 IRWM Planning Grant, the District, the County,
and the Nipomo Community Services District.
The compleƟ on of the 2014 IRWM Plan has added focus given the recent drought declaraƟ on,
the release of the Governor’s California Water AcƟ on Plan, and potenƟ al groundwater legislaƟ on.
What Are We Trying to Accomplish?
In San Luis Obispo County we are trying to:
• Improve resiliency in the face of uncertain hydrology and climate change
• Improve interconnecƟ ons between our exisƟ ng supplies and infrastructure to improve
reliability, especially in dry years
• Establish and maintain sustainable groundwater and watershed management pracƟ ces
What Are the Challenges?
The Central Coast and San Luis Obispo County face several challenges:
• The County is located in a relaƟ vely dry part of the state and is
subject to uncertain and highly variable hydrologic condiƟ ons
• Constantly changing and growing agricultural, urban, and
environmental water demands create a challenging planning
environment and increased compeƟ Ɵ on for the fi nite water supplies
• With a low and dispersed populaƟ on, the Central Coast region has a
limited ability to generate local funding to develop new projects and
faces challenges in idenƟ fying regional opportuniƟ es to take advantage
of economies of scale
• Local surface water supplies are limited, and imported water supplies
(i.e., State Water Project) are expensive and subject to hydrologic variability
• Groundwater has been relied upon too heavily, leading to the need for increased
and sustainable management to maintain both water quanƟ ty and quality
• Regulatory requirements/processes, and permiƫ ng constraints have limited potenƟ al project
opportuniƟ es, such as desalinaƟ on
Attachment 4
C6 - 21
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
2
Water Supply Challenges within San Luis Obispo County
The challenges described above come together in the water supply challenges that
face the County. Because much of the County is dependent upon groundwater for a
signifi cant porƟ on of its water supply, sustainable management of groundwater supplies
is one of the signifi cant challenges facing the County. The District serves as the monitor-
ing enƟ ty for the County, reporƟ ng groundwater levels to the California Department
of Water Resources (DWR) through their California Statewide Groundwater ElevaƟ on
Monitoring (CASGEM) Program. DWR uses the CASGEMs informaƟ on to evaluate all
groundwater basins in the State to idenƟ fy the highest priority basins that are threat-
ened by present or future changes in water demand. Five groundwater basins within San
Luis Obispo County have been idenƟ fi ed as medium or high priority basins (see Table
ES–1 and Figure ES–1).
Table ES–1. CASGEM Priority Basins in San Luis Obispo County
Basin Name IRWMP SubregionCASGEMs Priority
Paso Robles North County High
Los Osos North Coast High
Santa Maria South County High
San Luis Obispo ValleySouth County Medium
Cuyama Valley South County Medium
Figure ES–1. PorƟ on of DWR’s CASGEM Groundwater Basin PrioriƟ zaƟ on Map, South Central Region
Pismo Beach
Taft
Wasco
Avenal
Paso Robles
San Luis Obispo
!
!
!
!
!
!
5-22.10
5-
3-4.06
5-22.3-41
3-4
3-45
3-42
3-9
3-13
3-19
3-40
3-12
3-43
3-34
3-35
3-6
3-44
3-5
3-33
3-36
3-46
3-47
3-39
3-8
3-37
3-38
Groundwater basin/subbasin
High
Medium
Low
Very low
DWR South Central
Region Office boundary
Hydrologic region boundary
County boundary
Basin number
Subbasin number
City
3-1.02
3-1
Basin prioritization ranking
Source: California Department of Water Resources South Central Region CASGEM Groundwater Basin PrioriƟ zaƟ on Results; June 2, 2014.
Attachment 4
C6 - 22
3
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Using IRWM Approach to Address These Challenges
As menƟ oned above, San Luis Obispo County has a long history of water management.
Since 2005, comprehensive water management in the county has been guided by the
Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) approach as shown in Figure ES–2.
Each individual parƟ cipaƟ ng member agency of the RWMG is required by the State
Guidelines to also adopt the DWR approved plan to be eligible to receive future State
grant funding. Plan adopƟ on by a member agency also ensures regional support for
locally sponsored water resources projects funded through all State, federal, and local
grant and loan programs. The IRWM Plan is considered to be a living guidance docu-
ment for all member agencies to support, and re-adopt if necessary, with each IRWM
Plan update which is planned to occur approximately every fi ve years.
Figure ES–2. SLOC IRWM Plan Approach
20102009200820072011201220132014
Updated Regional Information
and Planning Needs, including
UWMPs and County Master
Water Report
Updated 2012
IRWM Plan
Guidelines
2007 IRWM Plan
SLO Planning
Grant Application
2014 IRWM Plan
Proposition 50 Studies
–Data Enhancement Plan
–Flood Protection Plan
–Groundwater Banking Plan
–Regional Permitting
Planning Grant Funded Studies
–Salt and Nutrient Management
–Groundwater Characterizing
–Regional Recycled Water
–Watershed Management
Attachment 4
C6 - 23
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
4
California Water Action Plan
In December 2013, the State of California released the California Water AcƟ on Plan
(CWAP) which outlined the State’s near-term and long-term water prioriƟ es. The CWAP
provides the State focus and vision for the next fi ve years to guide the State’s eff orts to:
• Enhance water supply reliability
• Restore damaged and destroyed ecosystems
• Improve the resilience of our infrastructure
While the CWAP demonstrates and focuses the State’s commitment, it recognizes that
the State government cannot do it alone. CollaboraƟ on with the local and federal
partners is essenƟ al to address the immediate challenges facing the State which
include:
• Uncertain water supplies • Water scarcity/drought
• Declining groundwater supplies • Poor water quality
• Floods • Supply disrupƟ ons
• Declining naƟ ve fi sh species and loss of wildlife habitat
• PopulaƟ on growth and climate change which further increase the severity of
these risks
The State’s commitment is demonstrated by the Governor’s proposed 2014-2015
budget which is intended to provide a fi nancial foundaƟ on for implemenƟ ng near-term
acƟ ons for the CWAP, recommending over $600 million in funding for water effi ciency
projects, wetland and watershed restoraƟ on, groundwater programs, conservaƟ on,
fl ood control, and integrated water management.
The CWAP idenƟ fi ed the following acƟ ons to address the most pressing water issues
facing Californians:
1. Make conservaƟ on a California way of life;
2. Increase regional self-reliance and integrated water management across all
levels of government;
3. Achieve the co-equal goals for the Delta;
4. Protect and restore important ecosystems;
5. Manage and prepare for dry periods;
6. Expand water storage capacity and improve groundwater management;
7. Provide safe water for all communiƟ es;
8. Increase fl ood protecƟ on;
9. Increase operaƟ onal and regulatory effi ciency;
10. IdenƟ fy sustainable and integrated fi nancing opportuniƟ es.
The Governor’s Final
California Water Action
Plan was released in
January 2014.
•
•
•
Wh
the
par
inc
•
•
•
•
•
The Governor’s Final
Attachment 4
C6 - 24
5
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Elements Guiding the Development of the 2014 IRWM Plan
The IRWM Plan looks to implement the San Luis Obispo County Vision and Mission.
The 2014 IRWM Plan:
• Builds on the successful collaboraƟ on and planning presented in the 2007 SLO IRWM Plan;
• Incorporates and considers regional planning studies and data generated since 2007;
• Considers and addresses the enhanced State IRWM planning standards;
• Considers changed regional condiƟ ons and enhanced planning approaches, including a
revised governance approach;
• Addresses the highest priority data gaps and planning needs as determined through a
public solicitaƟ on and review process; and
• Maintains eligibility for future implementaƟ on grants.
San Luis Obispo County IRWM Plan Vision
Create a united framework among SLO County
Stakeholders for sustainable water resource management.
San Luis Obispo County IRWM Mission
Facilitate regional plans, programs, and projects to further
sustainable water resource management.
Attachment 4
C6 - 25
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
6
Past County Success at Integrated Water Management
The Region has successfully parƟ cipated in the IRWM Process to leverage local funding by
obtaining over $14 million in grants from the State programs as listed in Table ES–2. More impor-
tantly, the Region has acƟ vely pursued implementaƟ on of projects and programs uƟ lizing local
funding sources, such as the Nacimiento Water Project (a $176.1 million, regional, supplemental
water supply project funded by a local bond).
Table ES–2. State Grants Successfully Obtained by San Luis Obispo County
Grant Funding Source & Funded ProjectsGrant Funding
AllocaƟ on
Lead Agency
Prop 50 Planning Grant $500,000
Data Enhancement Plan $72,500Flood Control District
Flood Management Plan $55,000Flood Control District
Groundwater Banking Plan $185,000Flood Control District
Regional Permiƫ ng Plan $187,500County of San Luis Obispo
Prop 84 ImplementaƟ on Grant $10,401,000
Grant AdministraƟ on $84,400Flood Control District
Los Osos Wastewater Project $ 5,945,444County of San Luis Obispo
Flood Control Zone 1/1A – Modifi ed 3c Project$2,200,000Flood Control District
Nipomo Supplemental Water Project $2,200,000Nipomo CSD
Prop 1E ImplementaƟ on Grant $2,800,000
Flood Control Zone 1/1A –Waterway
Management Program
$2,800,000Flood Control District
Prop 84 Planning Grant $1,000,000
Update Plan to Meet Standards $185,000Flood Control District
SNMP/Recycled Water Planning
IdenƟ fi caƟ on of Basins Requiring SNMPs $15,000Flood Control District
Santa Maria Groundwater Basin Study $200,000Flood Control District
Paso Robles Groundwater Basin SNMP $100,000City of Paso Robles
Paso Robles Groundwater Basin Model $50,000Flood Control District
Regional Recycled Water Planning $200,000Flood Control District
Watershed Management Planning $250,000Upper Salinas RCD
Coastal San Luis RCD
Total IRWM Grant Successes in SLO County
IRWM Region
$14,729,844
Attachment 4
C6 - 26
7
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
2014 IRWM Plan Projects
During the fi rst half of 2013, the San Luis Obispo County IRWM Plan Update established
goals and objecƟ ves related to water resources planning and management. To achieve
those goals, the Region’s parƟ cipants and stakeholders implement projects and programs.
Recent acƟ vity on the Plan Update included the creaƟ on of the 2014 IRWM Plan Project
List. The IRWM Plan includes both planned projects and programs, and describes how
those projects and programs address the IRWM Plan goals, and specifi cally how each
will be implemented. The IRWM Plan also maintains a list of water resources concepts
(projects in the preliminary or planning stages) for stakeholders to consider over the
Plan’s long term implementaƟ on.
San Luis Obispo County stakeholders have been acƟ vely engaged in the IRWM Plan
Update’s project solicitaƟ on and review process. Altogether, agencies, organizaƟ ons,
and individual stakeholders submiƩ ed 91 abstracts for the 2013 call for projects and
programs. The proposed abstracts can add value to San Luis Obispo County’s integrated
management of water resources in the areas of water supply, groundwater management,
fl ood management, ecosystem restoraƟ on, and general water resources management.
Current High Priority Projects
The High Priority Project List (Table ES–3) idenƟ fi es the 15 projects/programs that are
technically feasible and strategically suited to be fully described in the IRWM Plan.
The locaƟ on of the high priority projects, and subsequently added drought emergency
projects, are shown in Figure ES–6. See the next secƟ on to understand how the recent
drought led to addiƟ onal criƟ cal projects being added to the Project List.
Figure ES–3. Los Osos Wastewater Project Pipe
InstallaƟ on (2013)
Figure ES–4. Nacimiento Water Project, Rocky Canyon
Water Storage Tank ConstrucƟ on (2008)
Attachment 4
C6 - 27
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
8
Table ES–3. High Priority Projects
Project Title, Sponsor
1.Livestock & Land Program, Coastal San Luis Resource ConservaƟ on District (CSLRCD) and Upper Salinas-
Las Tablas Resource ConservaƟ on District (US-LTRCD)
2.LID Pilot Program, Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource ConservaƟ on District (US-LTRCD)
3.North County FerƟ lizer Regions– Precision Agriculture, Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource ConservaƟ on
District (US-LTRCD)
4.Aƫ yeh Ranch ConservaƟ on Easement, Land Conservancy
5.Upper Salinas River Basin Water ConservaƟ on/ConjuncƟ ve Use Project, Templeton CSD
6.Community Based Social MarkeƟ ng, Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource ConservaƟ on District (US-LTRCD)
7.Improving On-Farm Water Management Through DemonstraƟ on, Research & Outreach of Precision
Agricultural Best Management PracƟ ces, Vineyard Team and Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource
ConservaƟ on District (US-LTRCD)
8.City of Paso Robles Lake Nacimiento WTP ConstrucƟ on, City of Paso Robles
9.San Miguel CriƟ cal Water System Improvements, San Miguel CSD
10.8th Street Upper Aquifer Well and Nitrate Removal Facility, Los Osos Community Services District
11.Los Padres CCC Center– Stormwater LID Treatment Project, Morro Bay NaƟ onal Estuary Program
12.Oceano Drainage Improvement Project– Hwy 1 & 13th Street, County of San Luis Obispo, Department of
Public Works
13.Lopez Water Treatment Plant Membrane Rack AddiƟ on, San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
ConservaƟ on District
14.Recycle Water DistribuƟ on System Expansion, City of San Luis Obispo
15.Pismo Beach Recycled Water Project, City of Pismo Beach
Figure ES–5. U.S. Drought
Monitor Map indicaƟ ng
“ExcepƟ onal Drought”
throughout Central Coast
Response to Emergencies: 2014 Drought Relief Projects
On January 17, 2014, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. proclaimed
a State of Emergency as a result of the mulƟ -year drought causing
signifi cant impacts throughout California. The San Luis Obispo IRWM
Region is experiencing severe drought impacts. As shown in the adja-
cent U.S. Drought Monitor map (Figure ES–5), the Region is located in the
hardest hit area of the State. The U.S. Drought Monitor has classifi ed the
County’s drought condiƟ on as D4: ExcepƟ onal drought – the highest drought
classifi caƟ on possible. As of May 20, 2014, total annual rainfall in the region
was approximately 34% of the historical annual average, with annual precipita-
Ɵ on below average for the third consecuƟ ve year. It is unlikely that precipitaƟ on
totals will increase substanƟ ally this year, as most of the annual precipitaƟ on falls
between November and April. Given the severe drought condiƟ ons and impacts
to the Region, the District Board of Supervisors proclaimed a state of local emer-
gency on March 11, 2014. A number of local agencies declared similar emergen-
cies and/or implemented various water conservaƟ on measures. The declaraƟ on
of emergency facilitates the immediate implementaƟ on of drought responses,
including projects to provide relief from the drought.
Attachment 4
C6 - 28
9
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Figure ES–6. High Priority and Drought Emergency Project LocaƟ ons
14
15
13
11
10
9D2
D4
D3
D1
D5
8
#
7
65
4
3 #
2
1
12
= Program
= Project
#= Drought
Emergency
Project
San Luis Obispo
IRWM Plan
Final IRWM
Projects
The Region is predominantly supplied by groundwater, with supplemental supplies from local reservoirs
and the State Water Project, and several communiƟ es are enƟ rely dependent on just one of these sources.
Each of these drinking water supplies is severely impacted by the drought, puƫ ng communiƟ es at risk of
having adequate supplies to meet demands. With the 2014 drought, water levels in the groundwater basins
have decreased and aquifers along the coast suff er from increased seawater intrusion. Figure ES–7 shows
San Luis Obispo reservoirs’ current water levels compared to both reservoir capacity and historical reservoir
levels for this Ɵ me of year. As shown in the fi gure, current water levels are well below historical values. It is
criƟ cal that the regional partners implement projects and programs that improve water supply reliability.
In response to the current drought, the RWMG conducted a drought relief specifi c project solicitaƟ on and
prioriƟ zaƟ on process. Although 18 projects were submiƩ ed and incorporated into the IRWM Full Project
List, the RWMG prioriƟ zed fi ve projects (project locaƟ ons shown on Figure ES–6) that provide relief to
communiƟ es at risk of not meeƟ ng drinking water needs in this drought (see Table ES–4).
Table ES–4. San Luis Obispo Region Drought Emergency Projects
Project Title, Sponsor
D1CSA 23-Atascadero MWC-Garden Farms CWD Emergency InterƟ e Project, San Luis Obispo County
Flood Control & Water ConservaƟ on District
D2Emergency Water Turnout for Heritage Ranch CSD, Heritage Ranch CSD
D3Emergency Water Supply Project, Cambria Community Services District
D4San Simeon Small Scale Recycled Water Project – Purple Pipe DistribuƟ on, San Simeon CSD
D5Salinas Pipeline-Nacimiento Pipeline Emergency InterƟ e and Pipeline Extension Project, San Luis
Obispo County Flood Control & Water ConservaƟ on District
Attachment 4
C6 - 29
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
10
High fl ows and debris in Arroyo Grande Creek at the
railroad bridge (1999 fl ood event).
Figure ES–7. Current Reservoir Levels as of May 2014
The San Luis Obispo IRWM
Region has historically gone
through cycles of drought and
fl ood. The region will conƟ nue to
face fl uctuaƟ ng condiƟ ons that
aff ect water resources and may
require emergency response
planning. The region conƟ nues
to improve its emergency
planning, response and
adaptaƟ on to these challenges.
Attachment 4
C6 - 30
11
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
San Luis Obispo IRWM Region
The San Luis Obispo County IRWM Region covered by the IRWM Plan is coincident with
the boundaries of the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water ConservaƟ on
District (District) and the County of San Luis Obispo (see Figure ES–8). The County’s 3,304
square miles can be broken down further into the North Coast Sub-Region, North County
Sub-Region, and South County Sub-Region. The sub-region scale acknowledges each area’s
unique aƩ ributes and challenges, and diff erenƟ ates the local issues to allow for meaning-
ful, focused stakeholder involvement. Past planning eff orts, including the County Master
Water Report completed in 2012, used Water Planning Areas (WPAs) to provide increased
resoluƟ on to local areas within the Sub-Regions. As an addiƟ onal level of resoluƟ on to
the WPA concept, watershed “snapshots” are now used as a means of further capturing
detailed descripƟ ve informaƟ on for the Sub-Regions as the plan is updated over Ɵ me. The
Coastal San Luis and Upper Salinas-Las Tablas Resource ConservaƟ on Districts took the fi rst
step towards inventorying and reporƟ ng on informaƟ on available in each watershed. More
informaƟ on can be found at: hƩ p://slowatershedproject.org/ .
Figure ES–8. San Luis Obispo County IRWM Region, Sub-Regions, and Water Planning Areas (WPAs)
Attachment 4
C6 - 31
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
12
The North Coast Sub-Region spans from the County line (San Luis Obispo/Monterey)
southward to the community of Los Osos, bounded to the west by the Pacifi c Ocean and
to the east by the Santa Lucia Range. This Sub-Region includes WPAs 1 through 5. This
sub-region includes the urban areas of San Simeon, Cambria, Cayucos, Morro Bay and Los
Osos.
The South County Sub-Region spans from the City of San Luis Obispo south to the County
line (San Luis Obispo/Santa Barbara), east to the Cuyama Valley, and west to the com-
munity of Avila Beach, and includes WPAs 6 through 9. This Sub-Region includes the urban
areas of San Luis Obispo, Avila Beach/Port San Luis, Pismo Beach, Arroyo Grande, Grover
Beach, Oceano, and Nipomo.
The North County Sub-Region includes the WPAs that do not drain directly to the ocean
through the County’s coastal regions, and includes WPAs 10 through 16. The North County
Sub-Region extends inland from the San Luis Obispo/Santa Barbara County line north
to the San Luis Obispo/Monterey County line, bounded to the east by Kern and Fresno
CounƟ es, and to the west in part by the Santa Lucia range. This Sub-Region includes urban
areas of Paso Robles, Atascadero, Templeton, San Miguel, and Santa Margarita.
Regional Water Management Group
The legislaƟ on and the State IRWM Guidelines defi nes a RWMG as a group to include
three or more local agencies, at least two of which have statutory authority over water
supply or management, as well as those other persons necessary for the development and
implementaƟ on of the IRWM Plan. The purpose of the RWMG is to:
• Engage elected offi cials and water resource management leaders,
• Represent public and stakeholder groups,
• Resolve confl icts,
• Build poliƟ cal support, and
• Achieve a unifi ed front for the Plan’s implementaƟ on of regional water projects.
Through the San Luis Obispo County Region
Integrated Regional Water Management Program
ParƟ cipants Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU), San Luis Obispo local water agencies
and IRS 501(c)(3) nonprofi t organizaƟ ons came
together and formed the RWMG. The categorical
make-up of the RWMG among municipaliƟ es
(includes land-use), water resources agencies,
environmental/non-profi t organizaƟ ons, and
special districts is shown in Figure ES–9 (current
list of RWMG agencies is on the back sheet). The
number of agencies will likely conƟ nue to grow
over Ɵ me.
Figure ES–9. RWMG Member Agency Categories
Attachment 4
C6 - 32
13
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Disadvantaged CommuniƟ es
Based on DWR’s 2012 analysis, the IRWM Region has four (4) designated Disad-
vantaged CommuniƟ es (DACs), including the CommuniƟ es of San Miguel, Oceano,
San Simeon, and the City of San Luis Obispo. All four DACs are signatories to the MOU
and represented in the RWMG. All public outreach and communicaƟ on eff orts include
and support the involvement of the Region’s DACs. In fact, Plan kick-off included six (6)
introductory DAC workshops.
It’s important to note that the Region faces other obstacles beyond communiƟ es
challenged by low income. A majority of the Region’s land is unincorporated, rural
and agricultural land use. Because of this, communiƟ es throughout the Region are
disadvantaged in terms of their low and dispersed populaƟ ons, distance to adjacent
communiƟ es and water systems, and limitaƟ ons of resources available. This creates dif-
fi culƟ es when aƩ empƟ ng to achieve economies of scale, or even when simply seeking
to implement programs, projects, or system upgrades.
Tribal Councils
The two prominent NaƟ ve American Tribes of San Luis Obispo are the Salinan and
Northern Chumash Indian tribes. There are no tribal lands with specifi c water
resources management needs; however, members of these tribes are encouraged to
engage in the IRWM Program through noƟ fi caƟ ons using the NaƟ ve American Heritage
Commission contact list.
San Luis Obispo Region IRWM Plan Goals and Objectives
The Region’s IRWM Plan goals and objecƟ ves provide the basis for decision-making and
are used to evaluate project benefi ts in terms of implemenƟ ng
the Region’s IRWM Plan. The goals and objecƟ ves respond to
input on what the RWMG and interested stakeholders perceive
to be the Region’s major water resources issues. The goals and
objecƟ ves:
• Focus the IRWM Plan
• Provide a basis for determining the most appropriate
resource management strategies for the Region
• Are used to evaluate project benefi ts
• Guide IRWM project/program prioriƟ zaƟ on, development,
and implementaƟ on
A consensus-based approach was used to develop the goals and
objecƟ ves which included three Sub-Region workshops in March 2013. At
the workshops, stakeholders were asked to provide input on their Sub-
Region’s three most criƟ cal water resources issues. Answers varied, but
the results show that many of the 2007 IRWM Plan Goals and ObjecƟ ves
remain as important issues facing the Region.
SanLuisObispoCountySan Luis Obispo County
2014Integrated2014 Integrated
RegionalWaterRegional Water
ManagementPlanManagement Plan
JULY 20142014 IRWM PL A N
S A N L U I S OBISPO COU
N
T
Y
Prepared with GEI Consultants and support from
Fugro Consultants, Dudek, Gutierrez Consultants,
and Hollenbeck Consulting
Attachment 4
C6 - 33
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
14
The three issues with the largest number of occurrences, water supply, groundwa-
ter management, and water reclamaƟ on from wastewater treatment, represent
the majority of stated needs for improving the Region’s water resources.
North Coast Priority Issues
In the North Coast, the most pressing water issues include water reclamaƟ on from
wastewater treatment, sustainable water supplies, and addressing seawater intru-
sion into fresh groundwater aquifers. These issues refl ect the need for increasing
water supply reliability in part through water reuse and recycling opportuniƟ es,
and decreasing groundwater pumping in the coastal groundwater basins.
South County Priority Issues
In the South County, the most pressing water issues include groundwater manage-
ment, fl ood control, water reclamaƟ on from wastewater treatment, and adapta-
Ɵ on to climate change. Flood control and adaptaƟ on to the impacts of climate
change were idenƟ fi ed as more pressing issues here compared to the other
Sub-Regions.
North County Priority Issues
In the North County, the most pressing water issues include groundwater manage-
ment, water supply, and groundwater quality. These issues refl ect the need for
increasing the overall water supply in part through beƩ er groundwater manage-
ment, which is generally considered to include providing addiƟ onal supplies for
conjuncƟ ve use with surface water or groundwater recharge.
Top Three Issues Identifi ed by Stakeholders:
• Water supply
• Groundwater management
• Water reclamaƟ on from wastewater treatment
Attachment 4
C6 - 34
15
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
IRWM Plan Goals
The most pressing issues were translated into the IRWM Plan goals which
idenƟ fy what the RWMG and other IRWM Program ParƟ cipants wish
to accomplish under the broader IRWM Plan Vision and Mission
statements. In addiƟ on, IRWM Plan objecƟ ves were idenƟ fi ed
that provide more specifi c, tangible, and measurable acƟ vi-
Ɵ es to ensure the goals’ implementaƟ on. The goals of this
IRWM Plan encompass fi ve categories of water resources
management that defi ne the focus of this Region’s IRWM
Planning eff ort. These categories are illustrated as a
collecƟ on of goals that work together to bring synergy
to address important issues related to water quality,
disadvantaged communiƟ es (DACs), and climate change.
Water Supply Goal
The intent of the Water Supply Goal is to maintain or
improve water supply quanƟ ty and quality for potable water,
fi re protecƟ on, ecosystem health, and agricultural producƟ on
needs; as well as to cooperaƟ vely address limitaƟ ons, vulner-
abiliƟ es, conjuncƟ ve-use, and water-use effi ciency.
Ecosystem and Watershed Goal
The intent of the Ecosystem and Watershed Goal is to maintain or improve the health of
the Region’s watersheds, ecosystems, and natural resources through collaboraƟ ve and co-
operaƟ ve acƟ ons; with a focus on assessment, protecƟ on, and restoraƟ on/enhancement
of ecosystem and resource needs and vulnerabiliƟ es.
Groundwater Monitoring and Management (Groundwater) Goal
The intent of the Groundwater Management and Monitoring Goal is to achieve sustain-
able use of the Region’s water supply within groundwater basins through collaboraƟ ve
and cooperaƟ ve acƟ ons.
Flood Management Goal
The intent of the Flood Management Goal is to foster an integrated, watershed approach
to fl ood management and improved storm water quality through collaboraƟ ve com-
munity supported processes in order to ensure community health, safety, and to enhance
quality of life.
Water Resources Management and CommunicaƟ ons (Water Management) Goal
The intent of the Water Resources Management and CommunicaƟ ons Goal is to promote
open communicaƟ ons and regional cooperaƟ on in the protecƟ on and management of
water resources, including educaƟ on and outreach related to water resources condiƟ ons,
conservaƟ on/ water use effi ciency, water rights, water allocaƟ ons, and other regional
water resource management eff orts.
Attachment 4
C6 - 35
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
16
Prioritization of IRWM Goals and Objectives
The RWMG has made a deliberate decision not to prioriƟ ze the IRWM Plan ObjecƟ ves
on a regional level, but to prioriƟ ze them separately for each Sub-Region. The raƟ onale
for this decision results from the Region having a broad and complex geographic area
made up of a diverse group of stakeholders having varying water resources issues
depending on their locaƟ on. The RWMG has aimed to be as inclusive as possible of all
stakeholders in the Region, encouraging their acƟ ve parƟ cipaƟ on in the IRWM Planning
process and considering their concerns and needs. The IRWM Plan ObjecƟ ves are based
on the water resources issues described in the Region, as idenƟ fi ed by the three Sub-
Region stakeholder groups.
The purpose of introducing the Sub-Region PrioriƟ es is to allow for a ranking to take
place within each of the Sub-Regions. The Sub-Region PrioriƟ es stem from the regional
objecƟ ves, but speak specifi cally to local issues and what local objecƟ ves are going to be
commiƩ ed to in the implementaƟ on of IRWM Projects within each of the Sub-Regions.
This approach provides for a discussion of relevant importance and prioriƟ zaƟ on to the
regional ObjecƟ ves based on the geographic locaƟ on of the projects.
Sub-Region PrioriƟ es Lists
A Sub-Region Priority is defi ned as an issue or confl ict (i.e., not a project or single acƟ on)
that is taking place in the Sub-Region, which can be resolved through local (or regional)
acƟ ons within the control and jurisdicƟ on of local agencies. AddiƟ onally, a Sub-Region
Priority meets one or more of the IRWM Plan ObjecƟ ves and results in measurable
physical benefi ts.
Described more simply, Sub-Region PrioriƟ es are locally driven objecƟ ves that are Ɵ ed to
the IRWM Plan’s ObjecƟ ves at the regional level, but hold the emphasis and priority of
the Sub-Region stakeholders. In this way, local projects can be formed around objecƟ ves
that are meaningful to the Sub-Region, and inherently result in physical benefi ts and
synergies with the regional Goals and ObjecƟ ves.
The method for determining the Sub-Region PrioriƟ es began with the Sub-Region’s
workshop list of issues and concerns. The Sub-Region PrioriƟ es were approved by the
Sub-Region representaƟ ves and have the support of the local stakeholders. It is the
intent that each Sub-Region takes ownership of these prioriƟ es and updates the list and
conƟ nues to prioriƟ ze it to refl ect changes occurring within their Sub-Region over the
life of the IRWM Plan.
Figure ES–10 shows the relaƟ onship of the Sub-Region PrioriƟ es (on the right) to the
specifi c objecƟ ves for each IRWM Plan goal (on the leŌ and middle).
Attachment 4
C6 - 36
17
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Goals Abbreviated Objectives Sub-Region
Priority Summary
San Luis Obispo
IRWM Plan Vision
& IRWM Mission
Water Supply
Goal
1. Maximize Accessibility of Water
2. Adequate Water Supply
3. Sustainable Potable Water for Rural
4. Sustainable Water for Agriculture
5. Water System WQ Improvements
6. Implement Water Management Plans
7. Conservation/Water Use Efficiency
8. Plan for Vulnerabilities of Water Supplies
9. Diverse Supply (Recycled, Desalination)
10. Support Watershed Enhancement
1. Public Outreach on IRWM Implementation
2. Funding for IRWM Implementation
3. Support Local Control
4. Consider Property Owner Rights
5. Agency Alignment on Water Resources Efforts
6. Collaboration Between Urban, Rural, & Ag
7. DAC Support & Education
8. Promote Public Educational Programs
1. Understand Watershed Needs
2. Conserve Balance of Ecosystem
3. Reduce Contaminants
4. Public Involvement & Stewardship
5. Protect Endangered Species
6. Reduce Impacts of Invasive Species
7. Climate Change on Ecosystems
1. Understand Flood Management Needs
2. Promote Low-Impact Development
3. Enhance Natural Recharge
4. Improve Infrastructure & Operations
5. Implement Multiple Benefit Projects
6. Restore Streams, Rivers, & Floodplains
7. Support DAC Flood Protection
1. Understand Groundwater Issues & Conditions
2. Support Local Groundwater Management
3. Further Local Basin Management Objectives
4. CASGEM Program
5. Groundwater Recharge/Banking
6. Protect & Improve Groundwater Quality
Ecosystem &
Watershed Goal
Groundwater
Monitoring &
Management Goal
Flood
Management
Goal
Water Resources
Management &
Communications
Goal
5 North Coast Priorities
6 North County Priorities
9 South County Priorities
3 North Coast Priorities
4 North County Priorities
5 South County Priorities
3 North Coast Priorities
4 North County Priorities
9 South County Priorities
5 North Coast Priorities
1 North County Priorities
2 South County Priorities
3 North Coast Priorities
5 North County Priorities
4 South County Priorities
Figure ES–10. Sub-Region PrioriƟ es
Attachment 4
C6 - 37
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
18
North Coast Sub-Region
This Sub-Region (Figure ES–11) includes WPAs
1 through 5 and is characterized by its small
coastal watersheds and communiƟ es depen-
dent on groundwater and local surface water
supplies; its communiƟ es, watersheds, water
suppliers, and groundwater basins are listed
in Table ES–5. Figure ES–12 displays the water
resource issues of concern provided by North
Coast Sub-Region stakeholders idenƟ fying water
reclamaƟ on and water supply as the issues of
greatest concern. Both of these issues highlight
small coastal communiƟ es not having suffi cient
groundwater supplies or sea water intrusion
limiƟ ng groundwater basins’ safe yield.
Table ES–5. North Coast Sub-Region CharacterisƟ cs
WPALocal Governments,
CommuniƟ es, Places
of Interest
WatershedsWater SuppliersGroundwater Basins
1San
Simeon
• Community of San
Simeon
• Hearst Ranch
• San Simeon-Arroyo de
la Cruz
• San Simeon CSD*• San Carpoforo Valley
• Arroyo De La Cruz
Valley
• Pico Creek Valley
2Cambria • Town of Cambria• Big Creek–San
Carpoforo
• Santa Rosa Creek
• Cambria CSD*• San Simeon Valley
• Santa Rosa Valley
• Villa Valley
3Cayucos • Community of Cayucos• Cayucos Creek–Whale
Rock Area
• Morro Rock MWC
• Paso Robles Beach
Water AssociaƟ on
• CSA 10A
• Cayucos Cemetery
District
• Cayucos Valley
• Old Valley
• Toro Valley
4Morro
Bay
• California Men’s
Colony
• Cuesta College
• Camp San Luis Obispo
(NaƟ onal Guard)
• County Offi ce of
EducaƟ on
• County OperaƟ onal
Center
• City of Morro Bay
• Cayucos Creek–Whale
Rock Area
• Morro Bay
• California Men’s
Colony*
• Cuesta College
• Camp San Luis Obispo
(NaƟ onal Guard)
• County Offi ce of
EducaƟ on
• County OperaƟ onal
Center
• City of Morro Bay*
• Morro Valley
• Chorro Valley
5Los Osos • Community of Los
Osos
• Morro Bay• Los Osos CSD*
• S&T MWC*
• Golden State Water
Company
• Los Osos Valley
*RWMG Member
Figure ES–11. North Coast Sub-Region
Attachment 4
C6 - 38
19
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
North Coast Sub-Region Priorities–Key Issues
• Update Water Supply Capital Programs for small
coastal communiƟ es with alternaƟ ves analysis and
fi nancial requirements.
• Conduct Sub-Region study on maximum use of
recycled water.
• Study the impacts of climate change on coastal
community water supplies.
• Seek agency cooperaƟ on in regionalizing drinking
water, recycled water for irrigaƟ on and wastewater.
• Implement water conservaƟ on programs and
measures.
• Conduct a study on cost-eff ecƟ ve methods of
improving wastewater discharge quality including
improving source quality (i.e., reduced natural
contaminants in groundwater) of potable water.
• Understand fl ow needs and watershed funcƟ onality
and idenƟ fy priority areas for water supply
enhancement and conservaƟ on projects to ensure
watershed health.
• Conserve the balance of ecosystem funcƟ ons/
services.
• Develop a Groundwater Management Plan for all
groundwater basins used as drinking water supply.
• Create a State-approved groundwater monitoring
program at community or Sub-Region level.
• Determine the safe yield of coastal aquifers.
• IdenƟ fy, protect, and enhance aquifer recharge areas.
• DisƟ nguish the root cause of fl ooding problems.
• Restore fl oodplains, streams, and rivers.
• Promote low impact development projects.
• Develop fi nancial programs for drainage and fl ood
management projects.
• Develop methods to reach out to community on local
water-related informaƟ on and dates for Sub-Region
meeƟ ngs and workshops.
• IniƟ ate inner- and inter-watershed discussions on
conservaƟ on and reuse opƟ ons.
19
Figure ES–12. North Coast Public Concerns of Water Resources Issues
Attachment 4
C6 - 39
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
20
South County Sub-Region
This Sub-Region (Figure ES–15) contains a
mixture of small coastal communiƟ es and
higher elevaƟ on inland regions dependent on
groundwater, and local and State Water Project
supplies; it includes WPAs 6 through 9, with
communiƟ es, watersheds, water suppliers, and
groundwater basins listed in Table ES–7. Figure
ES–16 displays the issues of concern provided
by the South County Sub-Region stakeholders
idenƟ fying groundwater management and
fl ood control as the issues of greatest concern.
The groundwater management issues are
due in part to the challenges of managing the
adjudicated Santa Maria Groundwater Basin
and water shortage problems.
Table ES–6. South County Sub-Region CharacterisƟ cs
WPALocal Governments,
CommuniƟ es, Places
of Interest
WatershedsWater SuppliersGroundwater Basins
6San Luis
Obispo/Avila
• Cal Poly San Luis
Obispo
• Community of Avila
Beach
• Port San Luis
• City of San Luis Obispo
• Irish Hills Coastal
Watershed
• San Luis Obispo Creek
• Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
• Avila Beach CSD
• Avila Valley MWC
• San Miguelito MWC
• CSA 12
• Port San Luis
• City of San Luis Obispo*
• San Luis Obispo Valley
• San Luis Valley Sub-
Basin
• Avila Valley Sub-Basin
7South Coast • Community of Nipomo
• Community of Oceano
• Palo Mesa Village
• City of Pismo Beach
• City of Arroyo Grande
• City of Grover Beach
• Arroyo Grande Creek
• Nipomo Suey Creeks
• Pismo Creek
• Santa Maria River
• Oceano CSD*
• City of Pismo Beach*
• City of Arroyo Grande*
• City of Grover Beach*
• Golden State Water
Company
• Nipomo CSD*
• Rural Water Company
• Woodlands Mutual
Water Company
• Conoco Phillips
• Edna Valley Sub-Basin
• Santa Maria River
Valley
• Arroyo Grande Valley
Sub-Basin
• Nipomo Valley Sub-
Basin
• Pismo Creek Valley
Sub-Basin
8Huasna
Valley
• Alamo Creek
• Cuyama River
• Huasna River
• Huasna Valley
9Cuyama
Valley
• Cuyama River • Cuyama Valley Basin*
*RWMG Member
Figure ES–13. South County Sub-Region
Attachment 4
C6 - 40
21
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
2
Figure ES–14. South County Public Concerns of Water Resources Issues
South County Sub-Region Priorities–Key Issues
• Seek agricultural and urban supplemental water supplies.
• Study the impacts of sea level rise on coastal community
water supplies.
• Develop supplemental water supplies.
• Evaluate potenƟ al for groundwater banking/conjuncƟ ve
use programs and policies (locally or within State Water
Project system).
• InvesƟ gate opƟ ons for opƟ mizing use of local surface
water storage.
• Maximize producƟ on and delivery capacity of the local
water supply infrastructure (e.g., capacity improvements
to Lopez WTP, pipeline pigging, etc.).
• Evaluate potenƟ al for enhanced rainfall.
• Improved diversifi caƟ on of water supply resources for
the South County agencies.
• ImplementaƟ on of coordinated regional conservaƟ on
programs.
• Finalize/Implement AG Creek Habitat ConservaƟ on Plan.
• Develop an inventory of diversions from surface water
bodies.
• Install stream gauges on key regional creeks.
• Develop groundwater faciliƟ es or projects that increase
operaƟ onal and management fl exibility.
• Avoid seawater intrusion (idenƟ fy risk measures/
management thresholds, develop coordinated response).
• Develop management tools (conceptual and
groundwater fl ow models).
• Develop a uniform groundwater monitoring program for
the South County groundwater basins.
• Develop uniform metering and reporƟ ng for all
groundwater pumping in the South County.
• Increase groundwater monitoring (focused on storage).
• Install addiƟ onal dedicated monitoring wells including
down hole transducers in high priority areas.
• InvesƟ gate and quanƟ fy subsurface fl ows between the
Santa Maria Groundwater Basin management areas.
• InvesƟ gate and quanƟ fy available storage and reliable
yield.
• Establish policies to maintain health of the South
County’s groundwater basins.
• Prepare Salt and Nutrient Management Plan(s) to cover
the Sub-Region.
• Develop projects to improve the levels of fl ood
protecƟ on in urbanized areas.
• Increase storm water retenƟ on and percolaƟ on.
• Improve collaboraƟ on and data-sharing between urban,
agricultural, and rural pumpers.
• Maintain collaboraƟ ve eff orts between basin and
watershed management groups.
Attachment 4
C6 - 41
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
22
North County Sub-Region
Along with a growing urban populaƟ on, the
North County Sub-Region (Figure ES–13) is
predominantly agriculture and naƟ ve lands with
a dry arid climate dependent on the larger Paso
Robles Groundwater Basin and to a lesser extent
both local and State surface water supplies. This
Sub-Region includes WPAs 10 through 16, with
communiƟ es, watersheds, water suppliers, and
groundwater basins listed in Table ES–6. Figure
ES–14 displays the issues of concern provided by
the North County stakeholders idenƟ fying water
supply and groundwater management as the
issues of greatest concern. The most signifi cant example of these issues is the debate over how to manage and
stabilize water levels in the Paso Robles Basin and associated watersheds for human and environmental needs.
Table ES–7. North County Sub-Region CharacterisƟ cs
WPALocal Governments,
CommuniƟ es, Places of
Interest
WatershedsWater SuppliersGroundwater Basins
10Carrizo
Plain
• Community of California
Valley
• Black Sulphur Spring
• Soda Lake
• Carrizo Plain
11Rafael/ Big
Spring
• Upper San Juan Creek
• Lower San Juan Creek
• Rafael Valley
• Big Spring Area
12Santa
Margarita
• Village of Pozo
• Community of Santa
Margarita
• Santa Margarita Ranch
• Upper Salinas–Santa
Margarita Area
• CSA 23
• Santa Margarita Ranch
• Pozo Valley
• Rinconada Valley
• Santa Margarita
13Atascadero/
Templeton
• Community of
Templeton
• Community of Garden
Farms
• City of Atascadero
• Mid Salinas–
Atascadero Area
• Garden Farms CWD
• Templeton CSD*
• Atascadero MWC
• Paso Robles
• Atascadero Sub-
Basin
14Salinas/
Estrella
• Community of San
Miguel
• Community of Shandon
• Village of Whitley
Gardens
• Village of Creston
• Camp Roberts
• City of Paso Robles
• Estrella River
• Huer Huero Creek
• Lower San Juan Creek
• Upper San Juan Creek
• San Miguel CSD*
• Camp Roberts
• CSA 16 (Shandon)
• City of Paso Robles*
• Paso Robles
15Cholame • Community of Cholame• Cholame Creek • Cholame Valley
16Nacimiento • Heritage Ranch
• Community of Oak
Shores
• Nacimiento River• Nacimiento Water
Company
• Heritage Ranch CSD*
*RWMG Member
Figure ES–15. North County Sub-Region
Attachment 4
C6 - 42
23
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
North County Sub-Region Priorities–Key Issues
• Update Water Supply Capital Programs for small
inland water systems with alternaƟ ves analysis and
fi nancial requirements.
• Seek agricultural, rural, and urban opportuniƟ es,
working with other agencies and regional partners,
to develop conjuncƟ ve use and drought year water
supplies, including private groundwater pumpers.
• Pursue water conservaƟ on eff orts in all use sectors
and supplemental supply projects (non-groundwater)
to reduce dependence on groundwater.
• Pursue cost-eff ecƟ ve and technically feasible
conjuncƟ ve use projects to increase water supplies
for agricultural, rural, and urban water users.
• Ensure potable water is available for rural residents.
• Seek funding for supplemental water supply.
• Develop quanƟ fi able control studies on manmade
acƟ ons to improve groundwater quality and/or
increase groundwater elevaƟ ons using currently
adopted best management pracƟ ces.
• Understand watershed funcƟ onality and idenƟ fy
specifi c prioriƟ es for ensuring watershed health.
• Protect the Salinas River corridor.
• Pursue land conservaƟ on projects that protect
watersheds.
• Improve groundwater monitoring programs with
parƟ cipaƟ on from urban and agricultural pumpers to
track changes in groundwater levels and groundwater
quality.
• Establish sustainable yields with an emphasis of
improving the larger regional basin.
• Seek funding for supplemental water, conjuncƟ ve use
and/or groundwater banking programs to provide
greater operaƟ onal fl exibility.
• Work to balance groundwater basin through demand
management and supply opƟ ons.
• IdenƟ fy, protect, and enhance aquifer recharge areas.
• Perform an assessment study on current water rights
within the Paso Robles Basin and Salinas River.
• Maintain collaboraƟ ve eff orts with groundwater basin
and watershed stakeholders.
23
Figure ES–16. North County Public Concerns of Water Resources Issues
Attachment 4
C6 - 43
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
24
Plan Update Process
The 2014 IRWM Plan is a living document that will change over Ɵ me. It documents current and
relevant water resources issues facing the Region. The goal is to keep the plan current by incorporaƟ ng
new informaƟ on as it becomes available. For example, water resources informaƟ on contained within
Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs), new capital improvement project lists, and DWR IRWM
Plan Guidelines are expected to change over Ɵ me.
The update frequency of the IRWM Plan for re-adopƟ on by the Region’s stakeholders is planned to be
every fi ve years. The Ɵ me in-between each update is spent on a myriad of criƟ cal and required tasks
to ensure compliance with the IRWM Plan requirements and its implementaƟ on, assuming a funding
source is available to support this eff ort. Outreach eff orts during the intervening years should strive to
keep the IRWM Plan and related acƟ viƟ es fresh in the minds of RWMG member agencies, Sub-Region
stakeholders, DACs, and project sponsors.
How the IRWM Plan Update meets the 2012 IRWM Plan Guidelines and Plan Review Process
As the 2014 IRWM Plan was developed, the RWMG considered the list of November 2012 DWR
IRWM Guidelines to ensure acceptance and approval by the State. Figure ES–17 shows how the San
Luis Obispo 2014 IRWM Plan is organized. Table ES–8 summarizes where the secƟ ons meet the DWR
Guideline Standards. A more detailed review table is provided in Appendix Q of the IRWM Plan.
IRWM Plan Organization
SecƟ on A. IntroducƟ on
SecƟ on B. Governance, Stakeholder
Involvement, and Outreach
SecƟ on C. Region DescripƟ on
SecƟ on D. Water Supply, Demand, and Water
Budget
SecƟ on E. IRWM Goals and ObjecƟ ves
SecƟ on F. Resource Management Strategies
SecƟ on G. Project SolicitaƟ on, SelecƟ on and
PrioriƟ zaƟ on
SecƟ on H. Project IntegraƟ on and AlternaƟ ves
SecƟ on I. Plan Benefi ts and Impacts
SecƟ on J. Plan Performance and Monitoring
SecƟ on K. Data Management
SecƟ on L. Financing Strategies
SecƟ on M. Technical Analysis
SecƟ on N. RelaƟ on to Local Water and Land
Use Planning
SecƟ on O. Planning CoordinaƟ on
SecƟ on P. Climate Change
SecƟ on Q. Plan ImplementaƟ on and
Maintenance AcƟ viƟ es
SecƟ on R. References
Figure ES–17. IRWM Plan SecƟ ons
Attachment 4
C6 - 44
25
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Table ES–8. DWR IRWM Plan Update Standards Reference
DWR IRWM Plan Standard SecƟ on Where
Addressed
Governance B
Region DescripƟ on C, D
Goals & ObjecƟ ves E
State Resource Management Strategy F
IntegraƟ on H
Project Review Process G
Impacts and Benefi ts I
Plan Performance and Monitoring J
Data Management K
Finance L
Technical Analysis M
RelaƟ on to Local Water Planning N
RelaƟ on to Local Land Use Planning N
Stakeholder Involvement B, E, F, G, K, Q
CoordinaƟ on O
Climate Change P
Governance/Stakeholder Outreach
The governance and stakeholder outreach process which guided the
preparaƟ on of this IRWM Plan is based upon two documents
created to defi ne governance and parƟ cipaƟ on in the local
IRWM program. The San Luis Obispo County Region Inte-
grated Regional Water Management Program ParƟ cipants
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes the
Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) and essen-
Ɵ al governance structure inclusions.
Based upon this MOU, the Region’s Program ParƟ cipants
developed a CommunicaƟ ons and Outreach Plan – further
defi ning details of governance, outreach, and communicaƟ ons
processes uƟ lized to prepare the 2014 IRWM Plan.
IRWM
Memorandum of
Understanding
IRWM
Communications
& Outreach Plan
Attachment 4
C6 - 45
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
26
Governance Structure
The MOU defi nes the purpose of the RWMG, its membership, other Program Par-
Ɵ cipants, and each parƟ cipant’s role and responsibility in program development and
implementaƟ on. Figure ES–18 illustrates the IRWM Plan’s governance and organizaƟ onal
structure, as well as funcƟ onal relaƟ onships of the various IRWM Program ParƟ cipants.
Decisions are made at the RWMG meeƟ ngs and then elevated to the District’s (Lead
Agency) Board of Supervisors as-needed for fi nal approval and coordinaƟ on with DWR.
Stakeholder Involvement and Public Outreach Process
Public and stakeholder involvement have been integrated into the decision-making
process in a manner that ensures educaƟ on, awareness, balanced opportunity to
parƟ cipate, and clear communicaƟ on conduits. One of the goals of the public and
stakeholder involvement was to strengthen overall regional capacity for carrying on the
goals of IRWM throughout future years.
CommunicaƟ ons and Outreach
One of the two IRWM governance guidance documents is the CommunicaƟ ons and
Outreach Plan. The CommunicaƟ ons and Outreach Plan is a simple guide on how com-
Figure ES–18. IRWM Governance Structure
Attachment 4
C6 - 46
27
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
municaƟ on will fl ow and be managed through the life of the
IRWM Program. The purpose is stated as follows:
The purpose of the Outreach Plan is to saƟ sfy
DWR outreach requirements and build a solid,
inclusive, and representaƟ ve agency, stakeholder,
and DAC base that is supporƟ ve of the aims of the
IRWM Plan.
The CommunicaƟ ons and Outreach Plan built upon the MOU
that idenƟ fi es the IRWM Program ParƟ cipants (RWMG, WRAC,
RWMG Working Group, ImplementaƟ on Affi liates and stake-
holders) involved in the IRWM Plan Update, and describes the
planned and periodic communicaƟ ons that will occur between
the enƟ Ɵ es. The County’s IRWMP Plan website (hosted at
www.slocountywater.org ) shown on Figure ES-20 was used as
a repository of informaƟ on for the RWMG members, stake-
holders, and the public. Key Plan development milestones and
decision processes were documented in a series of brochures
like the ones shown on Figure ES–19 to elevate the awareness
of these accomplishments.
Climate Change
Consistent with DWR IRWM Guidelines, Climate Change
Analysis is now considered a criƟ cal component in the plan-
ning and implementaƟ on of water resources management
projects and programs. The 2012 IRWM Guidelines require
that IRWM Plans address both adaptaƟ on to the eff ects of
climate change and miƟ gaƟ on of greenhouse gas (GHG)
emission resulƟ ng from IRWM project implementaƟ on. As
a result, the Region idenƟ fi es and prioriƟ zes the Region’s
vulnerabiliƟ es to climate change, ranking project impacts and
idenƟ fying potenƟ al miƟ gaƟ on and adaptaƟ on responses.
In the process of evaluaƟ ng climate change for the San Luis
Obispo County IRWM Plan area, a Vulnerability Assessment
Checklist was prepared that considers GHG emissions be-
tween possible project alternaƟ ves occurring in the Region.
As part of this analysis and with the knowledge of the three
Sub-Regions (i.e., climate and socio-economic variables), each
Sub-Region is examined individually using a list of quesƟ ons
intended to beƩ er understand the unique vulnerabiliƟ es of
climate change. Each Sub-Region includes a set of categories
Figure ES–19. SLOC IRWM Plan Update Brochures
Figure ES–20. SLOC IRWM Plan Update Website
San Luis Obispo IRWM Plan Update
A Report on Current Activities
Completed–Implementation Grant Update
The San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and
Conservation District submitted a Proposition 84
Round 2 Implementation Grant to the California
Department of Water Resources requesting $7.5
million to fund a portion of six separate projects
with a total project cost of $22.5 million.
The projects included in the application
were selected from a list of over 20 projects
identiÀ ed at the Project Solicitation Workshop
held on October 3, 2012. These projects
address several critical water resources issues
in the area and contribute towards meeting
the current IRWM Plan Objectives. Several water
resources management actions emerged to address critical water issues inclu
d
i
n
g
:
stabilize declining levels in the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin; improve
environmental stewardship; and address critical water supply and quality nee
d
s
of disadvantaged communities (DAC). Five of the six projects are shown
o
n
the map below. The application also included a feasibility and design project
t
o
help meet critical water needs in San Simeon (see note below). The Depar
t
m
e
n
t
of Water Resources expects to release À nal funding awards in Fall 2013.
There will be another call for projects/programs this coming quarter. San
Luis Obispo County stakeholders will be asked to submit the project/pr
o
g
r
a
m
solicitation “short” forms deÀ ning projects/programs that help to meet the
IRWM Plan Goals and Objectives.
VOLUME 3—APRIL 2013–JUNE 2013
Location of Projects in Implementation Grant Application
N L U I S OBISPO COU
N
Upcoming Events
CALL FOR PROJECTS
COMING SOON!
IRWM Program Participants,
the RWMG will be collecting
project/program solicitation
forms in June/July. Be on the
look out for Call for Projects
July 2013 (Date TBD)
Sub-region Workshops in
North Coast, North County,
and South County
Key topics include: Sub-region
priorities and project review
process and criteria
August 2013 (Date TBD)
RWMG Meeting
Key topics include: project
review process and criteria,
initial project selection
screening, and resource
management strategies
A DAC IS DEFINED BY DWR AS FOLLOWS:
“For the purposes of Proposition 84 funding, a DAC is
de¿ ned as “a community with a median household income
(MHI) less than 80% of the Statewide average.” There is
a ¿ nancial opportunity for most RWMGs to seek out DACs
in their region, as most State grants either give special
consideration or preferences for projects that serve DACs,
or have funding percentages set-aside for projects that
support DACs.” The IRWM Region contains four DACs: San
Simeon, Oceano, San Luis Obispo, and San Miguel.
San Luis Obispo IRWM Plan Update
A Report on Current Activities
ACTIVITIES COMPLETED
Phase 1a and Phase 1b of Project Solicitation Process
In July 2013, the IRWM Region Stakeholders submitted their Project
A
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
s
for consideration as part of the IRWM Plan development. The Project Abs
t
r
a
c
t
s
(Phase 1a) included both project concepts and projects progressing
t
o
w
a
r
d
implementation. A total of 90 concept/project forms were submitted i
n
t
h
e
categories shown on the pie chart below.
DISCUSSION AT RWMG MEETING
The initial review and draft scoring methodology discussed at the
A
u
g
u
s
t
Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting resulted in an inf
o
r
m
a
t
i
v
e
discussion on the need to focus on the IRWM Objectives as the primary s
c
o
r
i
n
g
criteria. Action items coming out of the meeting included a request for
a
l
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
sponsors to À ll the Phase 1b Objectives Worksheet out prior to the À nal ranking as outlined in the Ranking Methodology Paper. The approved project ranking process (see À gure on page 2) establishes how projects are included in the IRWM Plan,
and identiÀ es the top ranked projects.
CREATING THE PROJECT LIST
As shown on the project ranking process, the concepts and projects are ra
n
k
e
d
t
o
create an initial Project List, which is submitted to the Region’s Stakeh
o
l
d
e
r
s
f
o
r
public comment. The Project List will be reviewed and adopted in the
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
RWMG meeting prior to progressing to Phase 2.
VOLUME 4—JUNE 2013–OCTOBER 2013
Important DWR Activities
Proposition 84
Implementation Grant Round
2 results: Draft Funding
Recommendations were released
indicating that grant funding
was not awarded to SLO County
IRWM Region.
Round 3 Implementation
Grant application deadline is
currently scheduled for end of
2014 or early 2015.
Draft CDWR IRWM Plan
Review Process is out for Public Review and Comment
with comments due by
October 18, 2013. The Plan
Review Process is pass or
fail. Eligibility to submit a
Round 3 Implementation grant
application is dependent on a
DWR-approved IRWM Plan.
http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/grants/
docs/Guidelines/PRP%20_fnl%20
draft__20130904.pdf
Upcoming Events
OCTOBER 2, 2013
RWMG Meeting
OCTOBER 18, 2013
Call for Full Project
Descriptions
TBD
Sub-Region Workshops
R
WM PLAN UP D A T E
er Groundwat
and Monitoring aMonitoring
ntmeManagem
22%
WaWaWaaWaWatetetetetr rSuSuSSpppppppppppppppplyylylylylylylylyylyylyyyyyWWW
34343433%%%%%
EcEososososoosysysyyyyteteteeteetmmmmm ananddd
WWaWWaWWateteteeersrshehehhehhdddd
2121%%
Floodd
Managemment
12%%
Water Resources
Management
and
Communication
11%
CONCEPT/PROJECT
FORMS SUBMITTED BY
PROJECT CATEGORY
g p
San L
A Repo
Comple
The San L
Conserva
Round 2
Departm
million t
with a to
The pro
were sel
identiÀ eÀ
held on
address
in the a
the cur
resour
stabili
enviro
of dis
the m
help
of W
Ther
N L U I S OBBISPPOOCOOU
N
Upcoomiingg EEveents
CALL FOR PROJECTS
COMING SOON!
IRWM Program Participants,
the RWMG will be collecting
project/program solicitation
forms in June/July. Be on the
look out for Call for Projects
July 2013 (Date TBD)
Sub-region Workshops in
North Coast, North County,
and South County
Key topics include: Sub-region
priorities and project review
process and criteria
August 2013 (Date TBD)
RWMG Meeting
Key topics include: project
review process and criteria,
initial project selection
screening, and resource
management strategiesmanagement strategies
San Luis Obispo IRWM Plan Update
A Report on Current Activities
ACTIVITIES COMPLETED
Phase 1a and Phase 1b of Project Solicitation Process
In July 2013, the IRWM Region Stakeholders submitted their Project Abstracts for consideration as part of the IRWM Plan development. The Project Abstracts (Phase 1a) included both project concepts and projects progressing toward
implementation. A total of 90 concept/project forms were submitted in the categories shown on the pie chart below.
DISCUSSION AT RWMG MEETING
The initial review and draft scoring methodology discussed at the August Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting resulted in an informative discussion on the need to focus on the IRWM Objectives as the primary scoring criteria. Action items coming out of the meeting included a request for all project sponsors to À ll the À Phase 1b Objectives Worksheet out prior to the t À nal ranking as Àoutlined in the Ranking Methodology Paper. The approved project ranking process rr(see À gure on page 2) establishes how projects are included in the IRWM Plan,
À
and identiÀ es the top ranked projects.À
CREATING THE PROJECT LIST
As shown on the project ranking process, the concepts and projects are ranked to createacreate an initian initial Prol Proojecoject List, t List, whichiswhich is submittsubmitted tothed to the Regione Region’sStakes Stakeholdersholders forfor public cpomment. TThe Project List will be reviewwed and aed and adopted idopted in the Ocn the October tober RWMG meeRWMG meetingpriting priiriortopror to progressinogressin Phg to Phase 2.
VOLUME 4—JUNE 2013–OCTOOBER 220133
Important DWR Activities
Proposition 84 Implementation Grant Round
2 results: Draft Funding Recommendations were released indicating that grant funding was not awarded to SLO County IRWM Region.
Round3ImplementationRound 3 Implementation Grant application deadline is currently scheduled for end of 2014 or early 2015.
Draft CDWR IRWM Plan Review Process is out for PublicReviewand Commt
Upcoming Events
OCTOBER 2, 2013
RWMG Meeting
OCTOBER 18, 2013
Call for Full Project
Descriptions
TBD
Sub-Region Workshops
R
W
RR
MPLAN UP D A TAA E
Water Resources
M
Attachment 4
C6 - 47
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
28
and a scoring system to assist in prioriƟ zing projects intended to address the vulnerabili-
Ɵ es based on the level of impact and the ability to miƟ gate for climate change in whole
or in part. PrioriƟ zaƟ on of each Sub-Region is as follows:
Priority RaƟ ng 1 – signifi cant vulnerabiliƟ es that have far-reaching impacts, are very
likely to occur, have a willingness to pay and can be addressed through well-defi ned
near-term projects where/when feasible.
Priority RaƟ ng 2 – signifi cant vulnerabiliƟ es with a high adapƟ ve capacity and can be
addressed through specifi c projects and planning studies and/or monitoring programs
where/when feasible.
Priority RaƟ ng 3 – less than signifi cant vulnerabiliƟ es for consideraƟ on in future long-
term projects and planning studies and/or monitoring programs where/when feasible.
Shown in Table ES–9 are the raƟ ng categories and their ranking for each Sub-Region. The
lisƟ ng of vulnerabiliƟ es begins below the table.
Table ES–9. Sub-Region Vulnerability RaƟ ng Categories and Ranking
Sub-Region RaƟ ng Categories RaƟ ng
North Coast
Sub-Region
Inadequate Storage Capacity 1
Saltwater Intrusion and Coastal InundaƟ on 1
Ecosystems and Habitat 2
Water Quality 2
Water Demand 3
Flooding 3
South County
Sub-Region
Decreased Water Supply 1
Coastal InundaƟ on 1
Water Demand 2
Water Quality 2
Ecosystems and Habitat 2
Flooding 2
North County
Sub-Region
Water Supply 1
Water Demand 1
Water Quality 2
Ecosystems and Habitat 2
Flooding 3
Attachment 4
C6 - 48
29
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Project Identifi cation and Selection Process
Project SolicitaƟ on Process
San Luis Obispo County stakeholders have been acƟ vely engaged in the IRWM Plan Update’s
project solicitaƟ on and review process. From June to December 2013, water resources con-
cepts and projects/programs were solicited from stakeholders. Altogether, agencies, organi-
zaƟ ons, and individual stakeholders submiƩ ed 91 abstracts for the 2013 call for projects and
programs. Stakeholders submiƩ ed abstracts that should add value to the Region’s integrated
management of water resources in the areas of water supply, groundwater management,
fl ood management, ecosystem restoraƟ on, and general water resources management.
Compiling the Full Project List
The submiƩ ed projects were reviewed and iniƟ ally ranked in accordance with
the RWMG-approved project review guidelines (follow the IRWMP quicklink at
www.slocountywater.org ). Some submiƩ als were either not IRWM-related or were
integrated into another project submiƩ al. Of the 91 submiƩ als, 81 were added to the Full
Project List - 52 of those were classifi ed as concepts and 29 were classifi ed as projects/
programs. Concepts, programs, and projects from the 2007 IRWM Plan were also reviewed,
34 of which were added to the Full Project List as well. As a result of this project screening,
the 2013 IRWM Plan Full Project List includes 115 projects.
CreaƟ ng the Final IRWM Plan Project List
On October 2nd, 2013, the IRWM review process and resulƟ ng Full Project List was present-
ed to the RWMG. Various integraƟ on opportuniƟ es were noted at that meeƟ ng. The RWMG
asked the RWMG Working Group (and Project Sponsors) to meet and integrate/fi nalize the
IRWM Plan Project List (includes both the Full Project List and Project Short List).
The RWMG Working Group held that public meeƟ ng on October 16th, 2013 to review the
IRWM Plan Project List. The whole process and resulƟ ng integrated IRWM Project List was
published as a brochure (Volume 5) and sent out to the RWMG and interested stakeholders
in order to seek input, inform the public, and solicit comments. This brochure memorializes
the results of this six month process to develop both the Full Project List and the Project
Short List to be included and evaluated in the IRWM Plan.
Why Two Lists?
The purpose of having two lists is to saƟ sfy the State’s requirements of an IRWM Plan (Final
IRWM Project List), and to constantly maintain a list of the region’s most current projects
for use in selecƟ on upon noƟ fi caƟ on of regional or local funding opportuniƟ es (Full Project
List). The Full Project List is updated on an as-needed basis (at a minimum of every two
years) such as was described earlier with the emergency drought project solicitaƟ on. All
projects included on this list are considered to be a part of the IRWM Plan and will be
considered for future funding and implementaƟ on opportuniƟ es.
Attachment 4
C6 - 49
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
30
Figure ES–21 visually describes how the collecƟ on of projects from the 2007 IRWM
Plan, the 2012 project solicitaƟ on, the Phase 1 2013 Project Abstracts (and ObjecƟ ve
Worksheet), and the Phase 2 Project Long Forms were combined to form the Full Project
List and which was further screened to create the Project Short List.
Figure ES–21. Project SolicitaƟ on and SelecƟ on Process
Attachment 4
C6 - 50
31
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
Financing Strategies
To date, the IRWM Planning eff ort has been funded through the District. The District
serves as the approving body and lead agency for the IRWM Plan’s development and
implementaƟ on. While the District is governed by the San Luis Obispo County Board of
Supervisors, its Board members and shared County staff act separately, depending on as-
signed responsibiliƟ es, on behalf of both the County of San Luis Obispo and the District.
The District receives local funding through its general property tax allocaƟ ons and from
revenues provided by parƟ cipaƟ ng agencies, organizaƟ ons, and other parƟ es benefi Ɵ ng
from District services. Both the District and DWR provide funding for developing and
updaƟ ng the IRWM Plan. DWR funding for planning and implementaƟ on of the IRWM
Plan has historically been obtained through the District’s applicaƟ on for publically sup-
ported grants issued as part of ProposiƟ ons 50 and 84; both being water bond measures
voted by the people of California to support integrated water resources management in
the State.
Local Agency Funding
Sources of local funding in the IRWM Region are constrained for direct use in implement-
ing new capital projects and management programs idenƟ fi ed in the IRWM Plan. This
includes sources of funding that RWMG member agencies will use to meet maintenance
and operaƟ ons obligaƟ ons for IRWM projects. Each member that seeks grant funding
to supplement local funding programs will need to demonstrate that maintenance and
operaƟ ons funds are to be commiƩ ed to the projects. Proof of local funding can be ac-
complished through an adopted capital improvement plan, other engineering feasibility
studies and reports, rate studies, or an approved funding program adopted pursuant to
California requirements.
Grants
Like other regions of the state, the IRWM Region has a limited ability to pay for further
projects or programs. With numerous areas of the Region being designated in the 2010
census as low income (i.e., in addiƟ on to State designated DACs), there is a limited ability
to raise local revenue. This makes grants and loans an important element in leveraging
the limited local fi nancing capacity. Fortunately, grants and/or loans are available from
Ɵ me to Ɵ me that can facilitate implementaƟ on of IRWM Plan projects and programs.
One of the keys for successful pursuit of grants for project implementaƟ on includes
having well-developed projects to the appropriate level of detail that meet grant funding
requirements.
Attachment 4
C6 - 51
Executive Summary | San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
32
Plan Implementation
An adapƟ ve management process has been adopted to create a balance between a
stable Plan that guides acƟ on, and a resilient Plan that allows for responding to changed
circumstances. The approach to updaƟ ng and amending the IRWM Plan is intended to
ensure its eff ecƟ ve implementaƟ on over Ɵ me and to make the San Luis Obispo County
IRWM Plan a living document.
Changes to regional and Sub-Region planning assumpƟ ons and prioriƟ es, to State and
federal legislaƟ ve and/or policy (i.e., responsiveness to the California Water AcƟ on Plan),
or climate condiƟ ons could create a need to update the list of projects and programs.
Areas of uncertainty that could drive a Plan update include liƟ gaƟ on, changes in on-farm
water use pracƟ ces, State and federal coastal plans, and major changes in land use that
would have an eff ect on the Region’s water use.
As a result, the IRWM Plan Update schedule provided in Figure ES–22 provides for
periodic and on-going acƟ viƟ es with one or more taking place each year to maximize
effi ciencies and uƟ lizaƟ on of staff and fi nancial resources.
Plan Performance and Monitoring
The IRWM Plan legislaƟ on and DWR standards require that IRWM Plans include per-
formance measures and a monitoring program to document progress towards meeƟ ng
IRWM Plan ObjecƟ ves, and a methodology that the RWMG can use to oversee and
evaluate implementaƟ on of plan and projects. The purpose of the Plan Performance and
Monitoring strategy is to document how the IRWM Plan ObjecƟ ves are to be measured
and how the projects will be overseen and evaluated in order to ensure the anƟ cipated
IRWM Plan objecƟ ves are being met.
IRWM Plan Structure
In response to the stated accomplishments and challenges facing the State and San Luis
Obispo County Region, the 2014 IRWM Plan contains a set of publicly supported strate-
gies for addressing those challenges with projects, programs, and policies that will help
the Region meet statewide prioriƟ es and regional needs. The IRWM Plan also describes
potenƟ al impacts and benefi ts of the projects, programs and policies, and how they will
be fi nanced and monitored to ensure the intended objecƟ ves are met.
In the end, the document must address specifi c requirements in the DWR IRWM Guide-
lines (DWR, November 2012). The IRWM Plan’s organizaƟ on (shown in Figure ES–17)
is intenƟ onally structured around the State requirements to assist in the review and
approval of the document.
Attachment 4
C6 - 52
33
San Luis Obispo 2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan | Executive Summary
20142015201620172018Activities
Plan Update Activities
Update Public Outreach Methodology
Adapt Procedures and Methodologies to
Changing Technologies
Provide Public Notice and Reason for IRWM
Plan Update
Modify Goals, Objectives, and/or Governance*
Evaluate State RMS and Update List of
WMSs, if Needed
Update Sub-Region Water Demand and
Supply Analysis Based on 2015 UWMPs
Revise Project Ranking and Integration
Methodology*
Re-evaluate Existing Full Project List and
Conduct Call for Projects, If Needed
Revise Implementation Priorities Methodology*
Re-evaluate Benefits/Impacts Discsussion of
Projects
Update Monitoring Measures and Performance
Measures to Closely Tie with Goals and
Objectives
Update DMS and Related Information
Update Discussions and Inclusion Relative to
Local Planning
Update Stakeholder Involvement Discussions
Update Coordination
Update Finance Alternatives and Options for
Final Project List
Re-Adopt IRWM Plan
Plan Reporting and Compliance Activities
Provide Biennial IRWM Plan Performance
Report
Provide Biennial Project Benefit Monitoring
Reports
Identify Needed Compliance Modifications from
Update CDWR Guidelines or Review and
Compliance Comments
* Constitutes Plan Re-Adoption
Figure ES–22. IRWM Plan Update Schedule
Attachment 4
C6 - 53
MODIFIED JULY 28, 2014
PROJECT CONTACT
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
IRWM Program Manager
County of San Luis Obispo, Department of Public Works
County Government Center, Room 206
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
(805) 781-5252
PWD@co.slo.ca.us
REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT GROUP
San Luis Obispo County
San Luis Obispo County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District
California Men’s Colony
Cambria CSD
City of Arroyo Grande
City of Grover Beach
City of Morro Bay
City of Paso Robles
City of Pismo Beach
City of San Luis Obispo
Central Coast Salmon Enhancement
Coastal San Luis Resource
Conservation District
Heritage Ranch CSD
Land Conservancy
Los Osos CSD
Morro Bay National Estuary Program
Nipomo CSD
Oceano CSD
Templeton CSD
San Miguel CSD
San Simeon CSD
S&T Mutual Water Company
Upper Salinas - Las Tablas Resource
Conservation District
For additional information about the 2014 IRWM Plan and access to the
electronic documents associated with this effort, visit:
http://www.slocountywater.org/
San Luis Obispo County
2014 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
Executive Summary
SAN LUIS OBISPO
REGION’S IRWM PLAN
VISION AND MISSION
STATEMENTS
IRWM PLAN VISION
Create a united framework
among SLO County
Stakeholders for sustainable
water resource management.
IRWM PLAN MISSION
Facilitate regional plans,
programs, and projects to
further sustainable water
resource management.
2014 IRW M P L A N
S A N L U I S O BISPO CO
U
N
T
Y
Prepared by GEI Consultants with
support from Fugro Consultants,
Dudek, Gutierrez Consultants, and
Hollenbeck Consulting
Attachment 4
C6 - 54