Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-2013 ac schmidt c2Heather From: Sent: To: Subject: Please forward for tonight. Thank you Maeve Kennedy Grimes City Clerk City of San Luis Obispo 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Phone: (805) 781 -7102 Email: mgrimes @slocity ore Grimes, Maeve Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:12 PM Goodwin, Heather FW: Sidewalk Program Agenda Item - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Carter, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:33 PM To: Grimes, Maeve Cc: Grigsby, Daryl; Lichtig, Katie Subject: FW: Sidewalk Program Agenda Item Public File Andrew Carter Council Member City of San Luis Obispo From: rschmidt@rain.org [rschmidt @rain.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:54 AM To: Marx, Jan; Carter, Andrew; dcaroen @slocity ore; Ashbaugh, John; Smith, Kathy Subject: Sidewalk Program Agenda Item Dear Council Members, Re: the sidewalk inspection program. JAN 2 2 2013 AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE Date k9 Item# "� This is totally infuriating and an insult to every resident of this city— especially to those like myself who have fallen on ill - maintained city -owned sidewalks (Murray median) and have to live lifelong with the consequences. It is nothing more than an official rationale for doing nothing to repair neighborhood sidewalks. Staff is asking you to endorse their slovenly do- nothing approach to neighborhood sidewalks. You MUST NOT ENDORSE THIS. Instead, you must direct staff to get on with repairing what needs to be repaired, and not to invent ridiculous "programs" like this that claim to be about reducing risk but which are actually rationales for unethical treatment of residents. The report to you is so full of nonsense and lies, it's hard to know how to even deal with it. For example: • "A report of a trip and fall is given the highest priority for repair." This is an outright lie. Nothing substantive has been done to the Murray median where I fell, despite more contacts to the city and to YOU DIRECTLY than I can count. Staff has even lied to you and claimed the opposite. In fact, we've been told we'll just have to wait for repairs to the sidewalk till it's time to rebuild Murray's automobile portion, which is years off. (Linking sidewalk repair to street repaving is idiotic -- there's no nexus.) • "The Sidewalk Inspection Program is one phase of sidewalk maintenance involving the proactive inspection of sidewalks on a regular schedule." What a lot of nonsense. Inspecting once every 8 years is "proactive ?" Give me a break. You should fire people who write this sort of trash. • But fear not, while neighborhoods get looked at once every 8 years, downtown will get annual inspections. Bravo! This is just more of the city's "free lunch" approach to how it allocates its resources: handouts to the rich and powerful and sticking the rest of us with the bill, and the pain and suffering. • "An average vertical displacement between sidewalk abutments that is used to evaluate a "trivial defect" is 3/4 inch." A % inch displacement is not trivial in the least. It's exactly the sort of thing people trip on — huge displacements are obvious, and can be avoided, but these aren't noticed, and are plenty to catch the toe or heel of a shoe and send someone flying. That's what happened to me. To neglect to note such defects "for appropriate action" is dereliction of the city's responsibility. • "This inspection program will assist in protecting the City in the event claims are made for inadequate maintenance of the sidewalks and thus will reduce risk and liability." Now we're getting down to what it's really all about— persiflage to create a paper trail to fend off insurance claims from people injured by the city's malfeasance. The city should be ashamed. THE CITY DOESN'T NEED THIS FANCY PAPERTRAIL DO- NOTHING NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK INSPECTION PROGRAM. WHAT IT NEEDS IS FOR THE COUNCIL TO TELL STAFF TO GETTO WORK FIXING NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK DEFECTS NOW!, AND TO PROVIDE THEM THE FUNDS TO DO IT. FIX THE SIDEWALKS NOW! Richard Schmidt