Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPPP PH3a and PH3 LUCE UpdateLAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENTS UPDATE City Council Meeting October 7, 2014 Recommendation Receive presentation on Fiscal Impacts of the Land Use and Circulation Elements. 2 Scope of the Fiscal Analysis Estimate City costs and revenues associated with planned land use and circulation improvements Focus on General Fund operating and maintenance costs for services and facilities Funding needs for facilities and infrastructure Funding capacity and gaps for existing development impact fees 3 Annual General Fund Revenues 4 Major revenues include: •Property tax – AB 8 allocation and in-lieu of motor vehicle fees •Sales tax – General, public safety, and ½ cent approved by voters for essential services (Measure Y) •Transient Occupancy Tax •Business tax •Utility tax •Franchise taxes •Service charges Total Revenues from LUCE Land Uses 5 Major Annual Service Costs 6 Police protection Transportation – added costs for new programs and deferred maintenance General Fund contributions to CIP and debt service Fire protection and emergency medical response General government services – added costs for deferred maintenance Leisure, cultural and social services Community Development, not including entitlement processes funded by permits and fees Total Expenditures from LUCE Land Uses 7 Net Fiscal Impact by Land Use 8 Net Fiscal Impact by Project Type 9 Additional Costs Proportionally Ascribed to Existing Development Maintenance on new LUCE road improvements Maintenance on new Class I bikeways in Bicycle Transportation Plan Costs of new transportation programs Operations for new fire station (38%) Related General Government costs These items add $2.67 million to City costs and reduce the annual net revenues to $452,700 10 Estimated Existing Impact Fees to be Paid by LUCE Development and Corresponding Facilities Costs 11 ($millions) LUCE Facilities Funding Gap 12 Transportation: $39.8 million Water Facilities: $5.1 million Parks: $17.3 million Police Station: $8.1 million Fire Station: $2.2 million Total: $72.5 million Potential Funding Sources 13 New/Expanded Development Impact Fees •City’s impact fee program needs overhaul State and Federal Grants Regional Transportation Funds Land Base Financing  The proposed LUCE land uses provide for a sound fiscal balance for the City in the future, even helping to correct some deferred maintenance issues. The transportation improvements and programs would add cost to the City budget, but revenues generated by new development should be sufficient to pay for these programs over the long run. There are funding gaps for new facilities, and it is critical that the City develop a comprehensive financing plan to address capital costs. 14 Fiscal Impact Conclusions