HomeMy WebLinkAbout4700-4727r
RESOLUTION NO. 4727(1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FORM OF THE
CONTRACT TO FURNISH'TRANSIT COACHES AND
EQUIPMENT.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. To approve the form of the Contract to Furnish Transit
Coaches and Equipment.
SECTION 2. To authorize staff to advertise for bids on this contract.
On motion of Councilman Dunin ,seconded by Councilman Griffin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Griffin, Dovey, Settle, and Mayo= Billig.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2ndday of Febru4ry ,
c
1982.
ATTEST:
v
CITY ERR PAMELA—VOGEA
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer U
City'-�
rney
ZD� zv'F��
Public Services Director
R 4727
i
J
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. INVITATION TO BID
The City of San Luis Obispo invites bids from manufacturers to
furnish the following transit coaches and equipment:
Three small heavy —duty transit coaches (approximately 30 feet long)
One standard heavy —duty transit coach (approximately 35 feet long)
One spare engine /transmission package
All special maintenance tools required
These coaches and the auxiliary equipment. shall conform to the Coach
and Equipment Specifications.
2. GENERAL BID PROCEDURES
The City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo will receive sealed bids
until 3:00 p.m. on March 5, 1982, in her office at:
City Hall
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo,
(P.O. Box 321)
CA 93401 (93406)
At 3:00 p.m. on March 5, 1982, all bids will be publicly opened and read
aloud in the Council Chambers at San Luis Obispo City Hall.
The City will not consider bids received after the specified time and
date.
Each bidder must submit a Bid Proposal plus all other pertinent documents
in a sealed envelope clearly marked:
"BID TO FURNISH HEAVY DUTY TRANSIT COACHES"
Each bidder must list and explain any deviations from
specifications. although the City encourages firm adherence to the
specifications, it will accept each bidder's deviations from specifications.
i 1
J
For this reason, bidders need not seek approval of proposed deviations before
submitting their bids.
The City may reject any bid and may waive any bid informality.
To determine the successful. bidder, the City will
life -cycle cost, .price, delivery time, adherence to speci
availability, and bidder responsibility. The City is not
apparent lowest bid price. In awarding the contract, the
up to two coaches and up to one spare engine /transmission
affecting unit prices.
consider
fications, parts
bound to accept the
City may add or delete
package without
Bidders should direct questions about bid procedures and specifications
to David Elliott. at (805) 541 -1000, extension 59.
3. PRICE
Prices quoted in Bid Proposals shall include all applicable taxes,
shall include delivery F.O.B. to San Luis Obispo, and shall remain firm for
30 days after the bid opening.. Wheelchair lifts and other equipment to
accommodate disabled riders are not subject to California sales tax. Bidders
should assume payment terms of thirty days net after acceptance of each coach or
piece of equipment (The City shall either accept or reject each coach or piece
of equipment within twenty days of the delivery date).
Both the City and the manufacturer must agree to any price change
caused by necessary deviations from specifications during manufacture of the
coaches or equipment.
4. BIDDER'S SURETY
With his bid, each bidder must furnish a certified check or bidder's
bond payable to the City of San Luis Obispo in an amount equal to ten
percent of the bid price. The City will return bidders' sureties either within
10 days after rejecting all bids or within 30 days after the successful bidder
executes the required agreement and furnishes the required performance bond..
If the successful bidder fails both to execute the required
agreement and to file the required performance bond within 14 days after he
has received notice that the City has awarded him the contract, he shall
forfeit his check or the. proceeds of his bond to the City as liquidated
damages.
5. PERFORMANCE BOND
l�
To guarantee faithful performance of the contract, the successful
bidder shall furnish a performance bond acceptable to the City in an amount
equal to 100 percent of the contract price.
6. COACH PERFORMANCE DATA
With his bid, each. bidder shall furnish the following_ performance
curves for each coach offered:
- Percent grade against speed in miles per hour
-Speed in miles per hour against time in seconds
-Brake horsepower against engine revolutions per minute
- Torque against engine revolutions per minute
Gradeability and acceleration curves shall represent performance with a full
load of seated passengers (averaging 150 pounds per passenger), with all
engine - driven accessories operating, and with a full complement of fuel, oil
and water.
With his bid, each bidder shall submit a road test plan by which the
City may verify prior to delivery that each coach furnished meets its
established performance standard.
7. DELIVERY
With his bid, each bidder shall state an estimated delivery period in
days from the date he executes the Agreement to Furnish Transit Coaches and
Equipment. When the successful bidder executes the agreement, he shall state a
fixed delivery period directly correlated to the estimated delivery period.
The manufacturer shall deliver the coaches and equipment to:
Street Maintenance Yard
642 Emily Street
San Luis Obispo, CA
Signed receipt of coaches or equipment by the City's authorized agent in
San Luis Obispo on the manifest of a common carrier, contracted over- the -road
delivery agent, or manufacturer's over- the -road delivery driver shall constitute
.f
delivery only and shall not constitute acceptance.
The manufacturer shall deliver an invoice to the City on or before the
delivery date of each coach or item of equipment.
The City may assess liquidated damages of $50.00 per day per coach or
$50.00 per day per equipment item for each day that a coach or an equipment item
remains undelivered beyond the agreed delivery period. The City will consider
extending the delivery period only for delays beyond the manufacturer's
control.
8. TITLE DOCUMENTS
Before delivery, the manufacturer must furnish the City all documents
necessary to secure title to a delivered coach or equipment item.
9. PARTS AND SERVICE
With his bid, each bidder shall furnish a current price list for parts,
the location of the nearest fully stocked supply depot, and the names and
locations of service representatives who will assist the City.
The manufacturer shall guarantee that replacement parts shall be
available for at least 10 years from the last date of acceptance.
The manufacturer shall provide prompt, competent engineering service to
assist the City in correcting any vehicle performance problems. The
manufacturer shall also comprehensively familiarize in maintenance procedures
two maintenance mechanics appointed by the City.
10. WARRANTY
With his bid, each bidder shall submit a detailed statement of the
warranty offered for the coaches and equipment to be furnished. This warranty
shall include at least the minimum provisions in Section 3 of the Coach and
Equipment Specifications.
If defects arise during the accepted warranty period, the- manufacturer
shall reimburse the City for City's labor costs incurred to remove and replace
defective parts. Reimbursement shall be calculated by multiplying the number of
man hours worked (not to exceed accepted hourly standards for.the work
performed) by one and one -half times the hourly compensation rate (including
fringe benefits) for a Heavy Equipment Mechanic employed by the City at the time
the work-is performed.
11. TERMIN9TION FOR DEFAULT
All terms of the contract are material. If the manufacturer fails to
perform by these terms, the City shall notify the manufacturer of the default.
If the manufacturer fails to remedy the default within 20 days of receiving
notice, the City may cancel, this contract without further obligation to the
manufacturer, except that the City shall pay for all coaches and equipment
delivered and accepted.
12. INDEMNITY
The manufacturer shall hold the City, North Coastal Transit, their board
members, agents and employees harmless from any liability for infringement of
patent rights and from any liability for defects in design, material and
workmanship which might arise from the City's or North Coastal Transit's use of
the coaches and equipment supplied by the manufacturer.
The manufacturer shall also defend the City, North Coastal Transit, their board
members, agents and employees against any claims or suits for infringement of
patent rights and for defects in design, material and workmanship which might
arise from the City's or North Coastal Transit's use of the coaches and
equipment supplied by the manufacturer. -
i
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
COACH AND EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
1. PURPOSE
The City of San Luis Obispo wants to buy from one manufacturer three
small heavy -duty transit coaches, one standard heavy -duty transit coach, one
spare engine /transmission package, and all special maintenance tools required.
The small and standard coaches should be essentially identical except for
length, passenger capacity, and perhaps ;ear axle drive gearing. These
specifications describe the type of coach the City wants to buy.
2. MATERIALS AND WORRSMANSHIP
The manufacturer. shall not omit any parts or details needed to make each
coach complete and ready for service and .shall not omit or downgrade standard
parts or details, even though the specifications may not mention such parts or
details. .All parts and materials shall be new and first -rate and shall conform
to standards established by the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM),,
the Society of Automotive. Engineers (SAE), and other pertinent associations.
Parts for each coach should be interchangeable with similar parts for the other
coaches: Workmanship shall be first -rate and shall. conform to the best practice
in the bus manufacturing industry.
All lumber shall be thoroughly kiln dried, clear, straight grained,
dressed on all sides, and free from knots and checks. Plywood shall be
waterproof with sealed waterproof edges.
All bolts, nuts, washers and exposed linkage shall be zinc plated or
cadmium plated to prevent corrosion.
All painted aluminum sheets shall be thoroughly cleaned and coated on
the outside with zinc-chromate protective. paint (or approved equal) prior to
assembly.
Welding procedures, welding materials, and welder qualifications shall
conform to standards established by ASTM and the American Welding Society. All
exposed welds shall be ground smooth,.
Where non - anodized metal is riveted or bolted to metal, contact surfaces
shall be thoroughly cleaned with a high temperature cleaning agent, double
rinsed, and coated with zinc - chromate prime; (or approved equal) formulated to
u -
prevent critical corrosion.
Where wood is placed next to wood, both surfaces shall be coated with
powdered aluminum and spar varnish or titanium oxide and linseed oil (or another
acceptable sealing compound).
All joints shall be protected by the application at assembly of
zinc — chromated metallic compound (or acceptable equal).
All steel and aluminum body parts which are to be painted shall be
thoroughly cleaned and double rinsed to ensure proper paint adhesion. Excess
joint sealer shall be removed. All parts shall be coated with zinc- chromate
primer. The underside of the roof and all concealed metal shall be coated with
enamel paint. or undercoating compound.
All exterior light fixtures shall be fitted to the contours of the coach
body and shall be sealed to prevent the entrance of water.
All rubber seals on ventilator doors and compartment cabinet doors
(except vents above the windshield) shall be placed in "u" shaped channels (or
placed by other acceptable means to hold the rubber firmly in place)..
Where burrs and sharp edges could cause injury, they shall be dressed.
All painted surfaces shall have a true and smooth surface free of
sanding or grinding marks. All exterior paint shall be baked —on polyurethane
enamel.
3. WARRANTY
The manufacturer shall warrant each coach and all auxiliary equipment to
be free from defects in design, material and workmanship for a period of at
least one year or until the accumulation of at least 50,000 miles, whichever
occurs first.
4. STATE AND REQUIREMENTS
At the time of manufacture each coach shall conform to all applicable
federal and state codes and standards including the following:
r�
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
California Vehicle Code
California Administrative Code, Title 13
56 CAPACITIES AND DIMENSIONS
Each coach shall conform to the following capacities and dimensions:
Seating capacity (minimum)
Length (maximum)
Width (maximum)
Height (maximum)
Interior headroom (minimum)
Front. step height (range)
Rear step height (range)
Door width (minimum)
Fuel tank capacity (minimum)
6. DRIVE TRAIN
Small Coach
30 passengers
31 feet
96 inches
120 inches
74 inches
.10 -14 inches
10 -14 inches
36 inches
80 gallons
Standard Coach
38 passengers
35 feet
96 inches
120 inches
74 inches
10 -14 inches
10 -14 inches
36 inches
80 gallons
ENGINE - The manufacturer shall demonstrate that the engine it
furnishes
-uses diesel fuel
-uses fuel economically
-can regularly power the fully loaded standard coach specified
up a sustained 7.2t grade over 2.5 miles
—can operate regularly at highway speed in the standard coach
specified and occasionally at highway speed in the small coach
specified
- discharges exhaust gases vertically upward through the left
rear corner of the coach
-has been adequately tested and used for public transit
-has a useful life properly matched to the useful life of
the coach
TRANSMISSION - The transmission shall be fully automatic.
REAR .AXLE - The rear axle drive ratio shall be suitable for regular
highway operation in the standard coach and for regular stop - and -go City
operation in the small coach.
DRIVE SHAFT - The drive shaft shall be guarded so that breakage will not
cause injury or additional damage.
COOLING SYSTEM - The cooling system shall maintain an optimum engine
temperature in continual operation under the following concurrent conditions:
-fully loaded with seated passengers
- fully. loaded with fuel, oil, and water
operated with all engine- driven accessories
operated an any grade up to 7.2%
- operated in any ambient temperature ranging from -30 degrees
F to .125 degrees F
7. TIRES, WHEELS, BRAKES, AND SUSPENSION
TIRES AND WHEELS - Minimum tire size shall be 9x22.5 (10 ply). Each
coach shall have two wheels mounted in front and four wheels mounted in the
rear. Each coach shall have one spare tire and wheel. All tires and wheels
shall be interchangeable front to rear or between coaches.
STEERING - Steering shall be power- assisted.
BRAKES - The brakes shall be self - adjusting, air - actuated, and suitable
for regular stop - and -go city operation.
SUSPENSION - The front and rear suspension shall be by full air springs
with double - acting shock absorbers.
8. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The electrical system shall be a 12 -volt or 24 -volt. direct current
system. All wiring shall be color -coded and shall not be visible on the
interior or exterior of the coach. Each circuit shall be individually protected
by a fuse or circuit breaker.
9. INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROLS
The following instruments and controls shall be located in the driver's
compartment:
� I
- speedometer with odometer
- voltmeter
-engine oil pressure gauge, warning light, and warning buzzer
- engine water temperature .gauge, warning light, and warning
buzzer
-air system pressure gauge, warning light, and warning buzzer
-fuel level gauge
- headlamp high .beam indicator light
-right turn indicator light
-left turn indicator light
- hazard flasher indicator light
-horn actuator
- hazard flasher switch
-exterior lighting switch
- interior lighting switch
- driver's lighting switch
- heater /defroster switches
- windshield wiper /washer switches
-door controls
- wheelchair lift controls
All meters, gauges, and indicator lights shall be installed on the front
cowl immediately forward of the steering wheel. All instruments and controls
shall be clearly labelled.
10. DRIVER COMFORT AND CONVENIENCE
The driver's compartment shall include the following features:
-a mechanically adjustable bucket seat
-a safety belt
-an overhead, opaque sun visor
-a suitable fresh air heater /defroster
-a fresh air vent
-a 9 "x12" (minimum) writing surface with clip
suitable overhead lighting
11. PASSENGER COMFORT AND CONVENIENCE
The passenger seats shall be fiberglass shells with cloth- covered,
replaceable inserts.
Suitable stanchions and handrails shall be installed.
A fresh air heating system shall be installed which can maintain a
temperature of 65 degrees F throughout the coach when the outside temperature is
0 degrees F.
Windows, vents, and roof vents shall provide adequate fresh air
circulation. Roof - mounted ventilation hatches shall be installed in the front
and .rear of the coach.
The interior of the coach shall be insulated against noise and
temperature extremes.
Adequate interior lighting shall be installed and shall not interfere
with driver visibility.
A passenger signalling system shall be installed.
Advertising card racks shall be installed inside the coach.
The following sign shall be painted or decalled in a visible location on
an interior bulkhead .near the front of the coach (minimum letter height is one
inch):
PLEASE
REMAIN SEATED WHEN THE BUS IS MOVING
RESERVE THE FRONT SEATS FOR ELDERLY AND DISABLED RIDERS
DO NOT SMOKE, EAT OR DRINK
A suitable wheelchair lift and a device to secure at least one wheelchair
shall be installed. To service the coach_ the driver shall be able to override
an interlock system if the lift fails to reach its stowed position.
Front and rear entrance doors shall. be provided.
All windows shall be tinted.
Suitable destination signs shall be installed. The City shall specify
the destinations to be printed.
12. SAFETY
n
l '
A 16 -unit first aid kit (specified in the California Administrative Code,
Title 13, Section 1243) shall be installed near the driver's compartment in
plain view.
A suitable fire extinguisher shall be installed near the driver's
compartment.
A red warning reflector kit. with. at least three reflectors shall be
provided:
Two front - mounted towing eyes .shall be installed.
An anti - static electricity grounding strap shall be installed.
13. SPECIAL EQUIPMENT
FAREBO% - A farebox acceptable to the City shall be installed in a
location convenient for boarding passengers to deposit fares and for the driver
.
to observe the deposited.amounts. Each complete .farebox furnished shall have
one spare vault. All vaults furnished shall be numbered sequentially beginning
with the number "60 ". All keys furnished for the same function shall be
interchangeable. All keys shall be delivered to the City of San Luis Obispo's
Public Services Director.
RADIO -t A single frequency mobile radio acceptable to the City_ (using 15w
on mobile band 450) shall be installed with the following equipment:
-3.5 db gain antenna
-dual foot switch
-boom microphone
14., APPEARANCE
Exterior and interior color. schemes will be selected by the City using
standard color charts after the contract is .awarded.
The exterior color scheme shall include one background color, two accent
colors and the transit system name in special script.
15. MANUALS AND CATALOGS
At least 30 days before delivery the manufacturer shall furnish for each
coach the following manuals and catalogs:
-a maintenance manual including instructions, schedules,
and wiring diagrams.
- complete parts cat alogs•(including ordering instructions) under one
cover for all coach components
- a.current price book for all parts
-three driver's manuals
lb. SPECIAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS
The special maintenance tool package shall include all unique tools and
devices especially required to maintain specifically the coaches furnished.
Such tools may include pullers, wrenches, jigs, cradles and testing devices.
r�
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
BID PROPOSAL
1. PROPOSAL
According to the General Provisions and the Coach and Equipment
Specifications of the Contract to Furnish Transit Coaches and Equipment, we
propose to furnish the following coaches and equipment at the stated prices:
Extended
Quantity Description Unit Price Price
Three Small heavy —duty transit coach
One Standard heavy -duty transit coach
One Spare engine /transmission package
One Special maintenance tools package
TOTAL
We understand that the City may add or delete up to two coaches and up to
one spare engine /transmission package without affecting unit prices. We also
understand that if we fail to execute the Agreement to Furnish Transit Coaches
and Equipment within 14 days after we have received notice from the City
by mail that it has awarded us the contract, we shall forfeit our bidder's
surety to the City as liquidated damages.
We shall furnish the coaches and equipment proposed within approximately
days after we execute the Agreement to Furnish Transit Coaches and
Equi— pment.
2. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
The coaches we propose to furnish shall meet the following
specifications:
A. Dimensions
1.
Overall
length (standard coach)
In.
2.
Overall
length (small coach)
In.
3.
Overall
width
In.
4.
Overall
height
In.
5. Wheelbase (standard coach)
6. Wheelbase (small coach)
7. Turning radius (standard coach)
8. Turning radius (small coach)
9. Interior headroom
10. Aisle width (18" above floor)
11. Front door opening (clear width)
12. Rear door opening (clear width)
13 Front step height (empty)
14. Front step height (fully loaded)
15. Rear step height. (empty)
16. Rear step height (fully loaded)
17. Tire size
In.
In.
In.
-- In.
In.
In.
In.
In.
In.
In.
In.
In.
B. Capacities
1. Searing capacity (standard coach)*
2. Seating capacity (small coach)*
3. Fuel tank capacity U.S. Gal.
*Includes jump seats at wheelchair locations
C.
Curb Weight (with full complement of fuel, oil and water)
1. On front wheels
2. On rear wheels
urer
3. Total
Lbs.
Lbs. .
Lbs.
D. Engine
1.
Manufact
2.
Model number
3.
Injector type
4.
Number of cylinders
5.
Bore
In.
6.
Stroke -
In.
7.
Displacement
Cu. In..
8.
Compress ion ratio
9..
Main bea rings
number
diameter
In.
length
In.
10.
Wrist pin bearings
diameter
In.
length
In.
type of lubrication
In.
11.
Connecting rod bearings
diameter
In.
length
In.
12.
Brake horsepower
g p
at
RPM
13.
Torque
Ft. Lb.
at
RPM
\� J
14.
Specific fuel consumption
Lb. /HP. /Hr.
15.
Crankcase oil capacity
In.
3. Drum width
dry
Qts.
In.
wet
Qts.
16.
Oil filter capacty
full flow
Qts.
bypass
Qts.
17.
Idle speed
RPM
E. Transmission
L. Manufacturer
2. Model
3. Type
4. Gears and ratios 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Rev
5. Oil capacity Qts.
F. Rear Axle Drive Ratios
1. Standard coach
2. Small coach
G. Cooling system
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
3. Capacity Qts.
4. Area Sq. In..
5. Number of fins per square inch
H. Steering Box
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
3. Ratio
I. Front Axle
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
3. GAWR Lbs.
J. Front Brakes
1. Manufacturer
2. Drum diameter
In.
3. Drum width
In.
4. Lining length
In.
5. Lining width
In.
6. Slack adjuster manufacturer
K. Front Suspension
1. Air spring manufacturer
2. Air spring diameter In,
3. Air spring height In.
4. Shock absorber manufacturer
5. Shock absorber stroke In.
L. Rear Axle
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
3, GAWK Lbs.
M. Rear Brakes
1. Manufacturer
2. Drum diameter
In.
3. Drum width
In.
4. Lining length
In.
5. Lining width
In,
6. Slack adjuster manufacturer
N. Rear Suspension
1: Air spring manufacturer
2. Air spring diameter In.
3. Air spring height In.
4. Shock absorber manufacturer
5. Shock absorber stroke In.
0. Air System
1. Compressor manufacturer
2. Compressor model
3. Compressor capacity CFM
4. Number of storage tanks
5. Total capacity of storage tanks Cu. In.
P. Wheelchair Lift
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
3. Minimum cycle time Sec.
4. Maximum cycle time Sec.
5. Dynamic load capacity Lbs.
Q. Body Construction (check one)
1. Body -on- chassis
2. Integral
R. Driver's Seat
1. Manufacturer
9
2. Model
S. Passenger Seats
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
T. Farebox
1. Manufacturer
2. Model
U. Radio
1.. Manufacturer
2. Model
V. Paint
1. Manufacturer
2. Type
3. DEVIATION FROM SPECIFICATIONS
The coaches and equipment we propose to furnish deviate from the
following specifications for the reasons stated:
4. REFERENCES
We have sold essentially identical coaches to the following transit
operators (preferred references are small California operators which have
operated these coaches for 2 years or more):
Operator /Agency:
Address:
Phone:
Administrator:
Operator /Agency:
Address:
Phone:
Administrator:
Operator /Agency:
Address:
Phone: '
Administrator:
I
5. PARTS AND SERVICE
The fully stocked supply depot nearest San Luis Obispo is:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
The names of the service representatives who will assist the City are:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
C. (D
6. CHECKLIST
We have included the following documents with this bid proposal:
Bidder's surety (check or bond)
Performance data
Road test plan
Price list for parts
Warranty statement
Signature:
Tit le:
Company:
Address:
Phone:
Date:
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
BIDDER'S BOND
We, (as Principal) and
(as Surety) , are bound to pay to the
City of San Luis Obispo ( "the City ") the sum of
dollars
If the proposal of the Principal to furnish transit coaches and equipment
(dated ) is accepted by the City, and if the Principal
executes the Agreement to Furnish Transit Coaches and Equipment and files the
required performance bond within 14 days after he has received notice from the
City by mail that it has awarded him the contract, then this obligation shall be
null and void. Otherwise, this obligation shall remain in full force and
effect.
Principal:
Signature:
Title:
Company:
Date:
Surety:
Signature:
Title:
Company:.
Date:
(Signature of the Surety must be properly attested.)
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
PERFORMANCE BOND
We, (as Principal) and
(as Surety), are bound to pay to the
City of San Luis Obispo ( "the City ") the sum of
dollars
If the Principal faithfully performs the Contract to Furnish Transit
Coaches and Equipment awarded by the City on
then this obligation shall be null and void. Otherwise, this obligation shall
remain in full force and effect.
Principal:
Signature:
Title:
Company:
Date:
Surety:
Signature:
Title:
Company:
Date:
(Signature of the Surety must be properly attested.)
CONTRACT TO FURNISH TRANSIT COACHES AND EQUIPMENT
AGREEMENT
The City of San Luis Obispo ( "the City ") and
( "the Manufacturer ") agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
This agreement includes the following documents incorporated by this
reference and supercedes any conflicting provisions within them:
General Provisions
Coach and Equipment Specifications
Accepted Bid Proposal
Performance Bond
2. ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED
The manufacturer shall furnish within days of executing this
agreement the following coaches and equipment at the stated prices:
Extended
Quantity Description Unit Price Price
Small heavy duty transit coach
Standard heavy duty transit coach
Spare engine /transmission package
Special maintenance tools package
TOTAL
/ - ��LJ _
/ - ZD �.�f= �� � �,
RESOLUTION NO. 4726 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FOR
THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTS FOR LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD/HIGHWAY 101 /SAN LUIS
CREEK PROJECT.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit A,
and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis Obispo and
the State of California, Department of Transportation, is hereby approved
and the Mayor.is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and
the original and two (2) copies of the executed agreement to: W. W. Evans,
Department of Transportation, District 5 Office; a copy to the City Engineer
and Finance Director.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey seconded by Councilman Griffin ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Griffin, Dunin, Settle, and Mayor Billig.
NOES: None.
I
ABSENT: None.
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of February 1982—
Attest:
V
City leek Pamela V es
Ma or Me nie C. B ill ig
R 4726
r
Resolution No. 4726 (1982 Series)
App rov d:
City Administrative Officer
Q
City En er
r.
05 -SLO- 101 - 25..6/26.0
05201 - 289500
Los Osos Valley Road overcrossing
District Agreement No. 5466 -V
THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON is between
the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of
Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
a body politic and a municipal
corporation of the State of
California, referred to herein
as CITY
RECITALS
1: The STATE comtemplates the improvement of a portion of
State Highway 101.between post mile 25.6 and post mile 26.0, by.
rehabilitation and correction of superelevation of the Los Osos
Valley Road overcrossing, Bridge No. 49 -185, and by realigning the
northbound on and off - ramps, hereinafter referred to as
"IMPROVEMENT ":
2. The City contemplates the extension of Los Osos Valley Road between the
State Highway overcrossing and 500 feet east of Route 101, including
a new structure over San Luis Obispo Creek, as a Federal -Aid Urban
project, hereinafter referred to as "EXTENSION"
3. The STATE will prepare the environmental studies and
project report, on the entire project with costs shared by CITY
and STATE in proportion to construction costs.
4. The CITY will at their expense prepare plans,on their
portion ( "EXTENSION ") and the STATE at their expense will prepare
PS &E on their portion ( "IMPROVEMENT "). Under a cooperative
agreement to be negotiated in-the future, both .portions will be
combined into one.project to be advertised, awarded, and constructed
by the STATE.
5. STATE and CITY will mutually benefit from the proposed
project from improvement of traffic circulation, safety, welfare,
and convenience of the public using the facility.
6. The CITY will finance their portion of work under this
agreement from Federal -Aid Urban funds covering 86.21% and CITY
funds matching for the remainder. The STATE will finance their
portion with STATE funds.
7. Exhibits A &B are attached and made a part of
this agreement.
SECTION I
STATE AGREES
1. To prepare and obtain approvals, in accordance with
STATE's policy and procedures, of the Environmental studies and
project report for the IMPROVEMENTS and EXTENSION, and bear
STATE's proportionate share thereof, as shown on Exhibit B. In
no event shall STATE,'s. obligation for said costs under this
agreement exceed the amount of $12,000 for the work described in
this Article.
2. To prepare plans, specifications and engineer's estimate
for the referred to IMPROVEMENTS and to bear all costs for the
work described in this Article.
O
3. Upon execution of this agreement to submit to CITY
billing in the amount of $20,200 which figure represents CITY's
estimated.share of work to be done by STATE and described in
Section I, Article 1:
4. Upon completion of work to be done. by STATE for CITY
to provide CITY with a final report of expenditures.
SECTION II
CITY AGREES
1. To deposit with STATE within 30 days of receipt of
STATE's billing, as provided in Section I,. Article 3 the
estimated amount of $20,200, which figure represents CITY's
estimated share of work to be.done by STATE as described in
Section I, Article.l.
2. Upon' completion by STATE of all work performed on
behalf of CITY as contained herein and upon receipt of a detailed
statement and billing therefor, to reimburse STATE promptly, any
amount over and above funds'deposited by CITY as defined herein-
before, required to complete CITY cost pursuant to this Agreement.
If,.however, the amount deposited by CITY with STATE is in excess
of the cost of the work, STATE will promptly return the excess
amount to CITY. Actual cost to CITY for work performed by STATE
on behalf of CITY as defined hereinbefore in Section I, will be
determined upon completion of all such work and final accounting
of all related charges, and shall be a sum of the following:
a) Salary costs computed in accordance with STATE'S
standard accounting procedures.
b) Travel and per diem expenses including charges
for the.use by such employee of STATE vehicles,
if required, in accordance with rates set up by
the State Board of Control under Section 706.
c) Functional.indirect and administrative overhead
costs computed in accordance with STATE'S
Accounting Manual Chapter II, Table 6 -2.
If the excess in either case is less than one.thousand dollars
($1,000), no refund.or demand for additional deposit will be
made until final accounting.
3. That in no event shall CITY's obligation for said
costs under this agreement exceed the amount of $21,000 for
the work described in this agreement, provided that CITY may,
in its sole discretion, hereafter in writing authorize a greater
amount.
4. That by execution of this Agreement, CITY hereby
grants to STATE the right to enter upon CITY owned lands
for work defined under this agreement.
5: To prepare plans, and engineer's estimate for the
Extension,.and to_ bear all costs for this work.
6. Said plans will be prepared in accordance with
STATE's policy and procedures, and approved by STATE, and
CITY will provide the original plans to the STATE.
SECTION III"
IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED:
1. That obligations of STATE under the terms of this
Agreement are contingent upon the appropriation of resources by
the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California
Transportation Commission.
2. That if the work to be performed by STATE and for
which CITY has advanced a deposit for its share, is to be delayed
indefinitely or postponed beyond January 1, 1985, STATE will
promptly return, at the discretion of and upon the demand of
CITY, such funds as are advanced and the provisions of this
Agreement shall be null and void without STATE and CITY incurring
any obligation to each other for any actions taken by either
party under this Agreement, provided however, that compensation
has been made for all costs incurred by STATE on behalf of CITY
up to such times as this Agreement becomes null and void.
3. That should any portion of the PROJECT be financed
with Federal funds or State gas tax funds, all applicable
procedures and policies relating to the use of such funds shall
apply notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement..
4. That Exhibits "A "B ", have been prepared to
depict as near as possible the general scope of work to be
accomplished hereunder and to delineate the approximate areas
of rights -of -way as set forth hereinbefore in this Agreement.
Actual areas shown on said exhibits may vary slightly from that
,:;hich is ultimately accomplished. work to be accomplished
pursuant to this Agreement shall be based on the final approved
plans which plans shall take precedence over that which is
shown on said Exhibits "A" and "B ", in the event of any
difference which may appear thereon.
5. That prior to STATE preparing PS: &E. CITY,will acquire
at the sole expense of CITY, all additional rights of way
required for EXTENSION and to certify to STATE, in a form
acceptable to STATE prior to January 1, 1984 or some later
date agreeable to STATE, that such property rights have been
acquired or that condemnation proceedings involving any
unacquired parcel have been filed and that said additional
rights of way have been cleared of all construction obstacles
above and below ground, including the removal and/or relocation
of all conflicting utilities.
6. That if existing public or private utilities
conflict with the construction of PROJECT, STATE will make
all arrangements with the owners of such utilities for their
protection, relocation, or removal. STATE will inspect the,
protection, relocation or removal of such utilities. If
there are costs of such protection, relocation or removal
which STATE or CITY must legally pay, STATE will bear said
costs for IMPROVEMENT and CITY will bear said costs for
EXTENSION. At this time no utility work at CITY's expense
is,anticipated.
7. That neither.STATE nor any officer or employee thereof
shall.be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
CITY under this Agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4 CITY shall fully indemnify and hold
c
I
STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined
by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated.to CITY under this
Agreement.
8. That neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof
shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by
reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or
in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not
delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is also agreed that;
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4 STATE shall fully
indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for
injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring
by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under
or in connection with any work, authority or J urisdiction not
delegated.to CITY under this Agreement.
9. That if a public hearing is determined to be required,.
STATE will do all work necessary as required by STATE's policy
and procedures, and CITY will bear its proportionate share of
the cost, and the STATE will bear its proportionate share.
10. That the preparing specifications and contract
documents, advertising, awarding the construction contract,
construction and construction engineering will be the subject
of a cooperative agreement to be negotiated in the future.
11. That CITY will reimburse STATE for CITY'S. estimated share
of work as described in Section III, Article 9, within 30 days of
1
y
receipt of billing therefor.
12. That this Agreement may be terminated and provisions
contained herein may be altered, changed, or amended by mutual
written consent of the parties hereto, up to the.completion and
acceptance of work to be done for CITY by STATE, at which
time this Agreement will be terminated. In any case this
Agreement shall terminate on January 1, 1985. .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
ADRIANA GIANTURCO
Director of Transportation
5M
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Environmental Study &
Project Report
(State O.H. Asses.)
Subtotal
Total
EXHIBIT B
Total
Cost
25,000
6,700
31,700
State
11,500
11;.500
City
FAU Other
11,638 1,862
6,.700
11,638 8,562
20,200
Reeotuti.on No. 4725
EXPRESSING THE CITY'S GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION TO
FOSTER GRUBER FOR HIS LONG AND
DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS.
WHEREAS, FosteA Gn.ubeA .6aved the City o6 San Lu,i,e Obispo in many
e
wage, atway�s stAi.vtng Got the betterment o6 the community;
WHEREAS, Foster, GAubet beh.ved a6 a member o6 the C.iti.zen6' Adv.i,eon.y
Committee bon aeveicat yeau epeanhead i.ng it6 .invotvement in many aspecte 06 city
gove&nment;
WHEREAS, FosteA GAubeA apent an enormous amount o6 time and energy
in auppont o6 an appnophi.ate bong -tam management ptan 6o,% Laguna Lake. He 6ett
veAy deeply about the adoption o6 the Laguna Lake Management Pta.n and a commitment
on the pant o6 the City to pn.oteet and pauvwe Laguna Lake bon. 6utuAe genaati.ons.
Thanks to his dedication the City adopted the Laguna Lake Management Ptan on
Jan.uaAy 19, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this City Counci. w,ishee to
expners its gratitude and appn.eci.ati.on to Fosta Gtuba ban h,i6 6etvice6 pa6onmed
and the example he has set ova the yean6.
On motion o6 Councitman Dunin, seconded by Councitman Gni66in
and on the 6ottowing tote ea2,P vote:
AYES: CouncitmembeJu Duni.n, Gniib6in, Davey, Settle, and Mayon. Bitti.g.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
the 6on.egoing Resotuti.on was paused and adopted this 2nd day o6 Febn.uany, 1982.
_ ti • - d.
y �: A
RESOLUTION NO. 4724 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING THE LAGUNA LAKE
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo City Council has adopted a final EIR for
the Laguna Lake Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing to consider adoption
of the Laguna Lake Management Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The Laguna Lake Management Program and Technical Appendix
is hereby adopted by the City of San Luis Obispo.
SECTION 2. A copy of the Laguna Lake Management Program shall be filed
with the City Clerk and copies made available at the San Luis Obispo Public
Services Department and the City- County Library.in San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilman Dunin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19thday of January ,
1982.
R 4724
Resolution.No. (1982 Series)
APPROVED:
4 a �,, _
City Administrativ Officer
A4/)(U
City Attorney
Public Services Direc or
����� a ��
��.v� �
y
RESOLUTION NO.
4723 (19 82 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That this Council hereby accepts the bid and authorizes the
Mayor to sign a contract on behalf of the City for the following:
PROJECT: PORTABLE AIR COMPRESSOR
ESTIMATE: $13,000
BIDDER: Oster -Bauer
CITY PLAN NO: NONE
BUDGET ACCOUNT: 50- 416350 -000
BID AMOUNT: $7,649
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk is directed to prepare the appropriate
documents for signature by the successful bidder and the Mayor.
On motion of Councilmember Settle ,seconded by Coun ilm mb r n,nin ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19 day of January-
1982.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
2�_ Q' C
City Administrative 0 fice
City Attorney
F nan - c r
R 4723
��'tv C,i�v1 G� n
� Coq ',, �:
�.�Ci%'y �---
RESOLUTION NO. 4722 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING RUDOLPH C. MURAVEZ AS FINANCE DIRECTOR /TREASURER
AND PAUL A. LANSPERY AS CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER TO SIGN
CHECKS, DRAFTS, AND ORDERS.FOR CITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows.:
SECTION 1. That Rudolph C. Muravez, Director of Finance /Treasurer
and Paul A. Lanspery, City Administrative Officer "shall be and are hereby
'authorized to sign all checks, drafts and other orders for and on behalf
of the city for deposit, encashment or otherwise with Crocker National Bank.
On motion of
Councilmember Sarfp , Seconded by Co,n ilm mli r nimin- ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, Mayor B l-lig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 19 day of January
1982,
YO IE CrSBILLIG
ATTEST:
CITY ERK P
APP�OVQED
City Administrative Of ice's
R 4722
rs'�IOLUTION'Nb. 4721
(1982 Series)-
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
INCREASING CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE ,
1981 =82 FISCAL YEAR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the following budget accounts be established to provide
for grant funded park improvements which consist of increased seating in high
use areas of Meadow Park and to accomplish fencing, brush.removal and creekside
rest at'Santa Rosa Park.
Account No. Description ;Amount
(9 0) 40 -5761 -624 Meadow Park Grant Improvements $21,700
(90)40- 5761 -643 Santa. Rosa Park Grant Improvements $6,700
$9,400
SECTION 2. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that estimated State Grant Revenues
be increased by $9,400 to provide funding for the above appropriations.
On motion of Councilmember_Settle -, seconded by Councilmember Dunin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, Mayor Billig
NOES: None-
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this. 19 day of January
1982.
Y R LAME
;C:'- BILLIG
ATTEST:.
CITY /CLERK _.P V ES
APPROVED:
City Administrative Off er
C tiC y Attorney
R 4721
RESOLUTION NO. 4720 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE- CITY AND MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT CENTERS FOR
THE CONDUCTING OF AN ASSESSMENT CENTER FOR FIRE
CHIEF-CANDIDATES.
WHEREAS, the City currently is in the process of selecting a
replacement for former Fire Chief Richard Minor; and
WHEREAS, as part of that selection process the City Admin-
istrative Officer and the Personnel Director desire that an assess-
ment center be conducted, to involve approximately eight finalists
for the Fire Chief position; and
WHEREAS, the City Administrative Officer and Personnel Director
recommend that the City retain Management Assessment Centers of
San Clemente, California., to conduct the assessment center,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo, as follows.:
Section 1. The Council hereby authorizes the City Administra-
tive Officer to retain Management Assessment Centers of San Clemente,
California, to conduct a Fire Chief selection assessment center,
for the fee and on the terms and conditions as more particularly
set out and described in Exhibit A, a three page letter with
attachment, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The City Administrative Officer is authorized to
execute any documents, and take any further steps, necessary to.,
complete arrangements for the assessment center.
0
R4720
On motion of Councilmember Settle
M
, seconded by Councilmember Dunin
and on the.following roll call vote.:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin, Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ASSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and .adopted this _
January , 1982.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK PAMELA OG S
APPROVED:
19 day of
City Administrative O ficer
City Attorney
I� � -�
'�-,_�
�y�o -�-, ��✓� �Gv�� -�
� J �
;�
1 .. _ �
�
iii id i jyy((''0�
232" ST AVENIDA GAVIOTA, SAN CLEOTE, CA. 92672 (7 ) 498 -7085
MANAGEMENT
ASSESSMENT.
CENTERS
77 rv:;..; -..
January 8, 1982
Ann McKibbin
Personnel Director
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 321
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Dear Ann :.
It was a pleasure meeting you by telephone. As' discussed; we look forward
to working with you and Mr. Lanspery in the selection of the City's new
Fire Chief:
We are prepared to conduct a one -day assessment center (AC) processing up to
nine fire chief candidates on January 30. The three assessors will be
(1) myself; (2) Raymond Picard, Fire Chief, City of Huntington Beach; and
(3) Joseph N. Baker, City Manager, City of Orange.. The AC will commence at
0800 and conclude at 1600. In turn, we would request that you and Mr. Lanspery
meet with us for breakfast at the Discovery Inn, at 0700, on January 30, 1982-
It is suggested that the two of you observe the entire AC. Further, that
after the.AC, Mr. Lanspery visit with the candidates from 1600- 1700. The AC
results will be disclosed and described for the two of you from 1700 thereafter.
The fee for our technical services is $2,500.00.
The AC will include the following .job - related exercises: (1) oral presentation,
(2) leaderless group, (3) competitive role playing, (4) written essay, (5) panel
interview, (6) peer group appraisal, and (7) assigned roles. A typical agenda
is enclosed for your perusal.
On the 30th we will need physical space to accommodate the.entire group and a
smaller interview room. Also, we would request that the City provide coffee
and juice in the morning,, and (if possible) a catered box lunch.
Our reservations are confirmed at the Discovery Inn for Friday, January 29,1982.
Best regards.
Sincerely,
0
Paul M. Whisenand, Ph.D.
President
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
es^nt ent vi= g Cinlers
21151 RICHMOND CIRCLE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92646 (714) 968 -4955
ASSESSMENT CENTER
FOR THE POSITION OF
- FIRE CAPTAIN -
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA
August 29, 1981
- CENTER AGENDA -
SATURDAY, AUGUST 29, 1981
0800 -0830 CENTER AGENDA OVERVIEW
- ASSESSMENT TEAM
• Bob D. Simpson
• Raymond Picard
Paul M. Whisenand, Ph..D.
- CANDIDATES
- OBSERVERS
0830 -0930 INSTRUMENTATION
0930 -0940 BREAK
0940 -1010 CREATION OF A GRAPHIC BIOGRAPHY
1010 -1100 VISUAL AND VERBAL PRESENTATION OF GRAPHIC
.BIOGRAPHY
1100 -1145 ASSESSMENT CENTER EXERCISE NUMBER ONE
1145 -1300 PROGRAM LUNCH
CONSULTANTS TO PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
f K l
ASSESSMENT CENTER
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA
0
August 29, 1981
Page Two
1300 -1430
WRITTEN /ASSESSMENT /INTERPERSONAL
1430 -1445
BREAK
1445 -1530
ASSESSMENT EXERCISE TWO
1530 -1615
ASSESSMENT EXERCISE THREE
1615 -1630
CLOSING REMARKS /ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: KEY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
(Equally Weighted)
Professional Job Knowledge
Interpersonal Skills
Written.Skills
Verbal Skills
Analytical Ability
Versatility
Group Appraisal of Promotability
a
I
RESOLUTION NO. 4719 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO TO WITHDRAW CITY'S APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN STREETS.
WHEREAS, THE CITY has initiated proceedings with the Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to annex portions of certain
streets, to wit Foothill Blvd., Orcutt-.Rd., Sacramento Drive,
Calle Joaquin, Madonna Rd., Prefumo Canyon Rd., for the purpose
of assuming maintenance;
WHEREAS, over the clear and formal objections of the City,
LAFCo has amended the proposed street annexation by adding to it
the parcel on which the new Post Office facility has been built; and
WHEREAS, LAFCo will be meeting on January 21, 1982, to consider
City's compliance with LAFCo's direction to City to initiate pro-
ceedings consistent with the annexation proposal as amended; and
WHEREAS, the City continues to object to the described amend-
ment to the annexation proposal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of San Luis
Obispo, as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor hereby is authorized and directed to sign
and deliver a letter to LAFCo,_ -in substantially the form set out in
the attached "DRAFT" marked Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Section 2. The Clerk is directed immediately to deliver a copy
of this resolution to LAFCo's Executive Officer.
R 4719
On motion of Councilmember Griffin seconded byCouncilmember Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Mayor Billig
NOES None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18 day of
January , 1982.
ATTEST:
Zvi //)Vm
City Clerk- Pamel voges
APPROVED:
. Zz
City Administrative Of icer
City Attorney
DRAFT
Local Agency.Formation Commission
County of San Luis Obispo
Office of the County Administrator.
Courthouse Annex
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
Re: Annexation of Portions of Certain City Streets
Your File No. 7 -R -81
Your Resolutions No. 81 -27 and 81 -41
Dear Commissioners:
on December 11, 1981, the City made a second request to
delete the new Post Office facility from City's proposal to annex
portions of certain streets. By letter from your Deputy Executive
Officer.; Paul L. Hood, dated January 12, 1982, and
a memorandum to you from Mr. Hood dated January 14, 1982, we
are informed that at your January 1.9, 1982 . meeting your staff will
advise you our request-has been summarily rejected because the
denial of our first request was final and conclusive under the
terms of the controlling statute.
We assume you will follow your staff advice on-'.the 19th and
not act on our second request. That being so, please consider
this letter a notice of withdrawal, authorized and directed by
the City Council, of the above referenced annexation proposal.
We recognize that the applicable law (Municipal Organization Act
of 1977) does not include a provision for withdrawal. Nonetheless,
it is the Council's position that because LAFCq has turned an
innocuous street maintenance annexation into one including a
facility existing totally at variance with'adopted City policy,
the City has no choice but to withdraw the entire proposal. It
is difficult to accept the possibility that the controlling law can
be construed to allow LAFCO fully to change the nature of an
annexation proposal without some recourse for the authority
initiating proceeding. If nothing else, LAFCO's exercise of
authority in such a manner will have a chilling effect on those
who would make annexation proposals.
Very truly yours,
N
Melanie Billig
Mayor
I
i
RESOLUTION NO. 4718(1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO EXPRESSING THE NEED FOR EARTHQUAKE PLANNING
AS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF NUCLEAR RESPONSE PREPAREDNESS
WHEREAS, the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant is located within
2.5 miles of a major active earthquake fault; and
WHEREAS, Seismic safety is recognized as a critical safety issue
in the licensing proceedings for the plant; and
WHEREAS, adequate emergency preparedness is essential to protect
the health and safety of persons residing, working and attending school
in and around the City of San Luis Obispo;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby expresses
grave concerns about the adequacy of the San Luis Obispo County Nuclear
Response Plan absent thorough consideration in the plan of the complications
resulting from a major earthquake causing, or occurring simultaneously with,
a radiological emergency at the plant; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo urgently petitions the Board of Supervisors of the County of San
Luis Obispo to require that the complications resulting from a major
earthquake be fully addressed in the San Luis Obispo County Nuclear
Response Plan, and in each of its major components, before such plan is
approved_; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be promptly for-
warded to the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors,,the California
Office of Emergency Services, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R 4718
Resolution No. 4718 (1982 Series)
Page 2
On motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilwoman Dovey ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of January ,
1982.
ATTEST:
ralWARNME ME 5 r
APPROVED:
a� a 'JN►�S
City Administrative Officer
City Attorney
n
Su
C3
RESOLUTION NO.4717 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4580 (1981 Series) TO INCREASE THE
MONTHLY SALARY OF THE CITY ATTORNEY.
WHEREAS, on August 18, 1981, the Council adopted Resolution No. 4580
(1981 Series), entitled "A Resolution of the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo Establishing Salaries and Benefits for Certain Management
Personnel and Superseding Previous Resolutions in Conflict ", copy
attached; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to amend that resolution to increase the
salary of the City Attorney as set out therein;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
Section A. Section 1 of Article I of Resolution No. 4580 (1981 Series)
(copy attached for reference) hereby is amended to increase the City Attorney
salary ($3500 /month) to $3700 /month, effective January 1, 1982.
Section B. In all other respects Resolution 4580 (1981 Series) shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
On Motion of Councilman Griffin
and on the following roll call voter
seconded by Councilwoman Dovey
AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Dovey, Dunin, Settle and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT.:None,�
R 4717
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 11th- day of January
1982.
ATTEST:
r
City lerk Pamela ges
City Administrative offic r
City Attorney
ina.nce it r
Personnel Director
Mayor Melanie C. Billig
* * * * * * * * * *
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 4580 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ESTABLISHING SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN MANAGEMENT
PERSONNEL AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
ARTICLE I
Salary Provisions
Employees covered by this resolution shall be paid at the monthly salaries
listed below effective July 1, 1981:
1. Council appointed employees
City Administrator --
City Attorney $3,500
City Clerk 1,950
2. City Administrative Officer appointed
City Engineer $2,750
Director of Community Development 3,000
Director of Public Services 3,300
Director of Recreation 2,400
Finance Director 2,900
Fire Chief 3,150
Personnel Director 2,200
Police Chief 3,500
Assistant City Attorney /Assistant
to the Administrator 21200
ARTICLE II
Benefits
Section A Medical Insurance
For medical insurance the city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost
of providing medical insurance for management employees and their dependents.
Such contribution shall be spent first on employee coverage under an approved
medical insurance plan and, second on dependent coverage. The city reserves
R 4580
the right to choose the method of insuring and funding the benefit.
Section B Eye Care
The city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost of providing an
approved eye care insurance plan for management employees and their
dependents. .
Section C Dental Plan
The city agrees to contribute an amount equal to the cost of providing an
approved dental insurance plan for management employees and their dependents.
Section D Unexpended Fringe Benefit
The city shall pay to each management employee as soon as practicable prior
to December 31, an annual lump sum payment (subject to appropriate taxation)
for the difference between the amounts provided under Sections A through C
above, and any lesser sum expended by the employee for medical, eye care,
and dental coverage for the period of July 1., 1981, through December 31, 1981.
Each employee shall be required to carry a minimum of medical, eye care, and
dental insurance for self.
Section E Life and Disability
The city shall provide the following special insurance benefits:
1. Long -term disability insurance providing 60% of gross salary
to age 65 for any sickness or accident after a-90-day waiting
period.
2. $50,000 term life insurance including accidental death and
dismemberment.
3. One -half of employee's health insurance premium paid for retired
employees who elect to remain members of the city's group health
plan.
Section F Retirement
The city agrees to provide the Public Employees' Retirement System's 2%
-2-
at age 60 plan to all eligible employees including the amendment permitting
conversion of unused sick leave to .additional "retirement credit, the 1959
survivor's benefit and one year final compensation.
The police and fire chiefs.shall receive the same retirement benefits as sworn
personnel in their department.
The city further agrees to implement a plan whereby the city will pay the
employee's current contribution (percentage of salary effective 7 -1 -81) on
behalf of the employee to P.E.R.S. These amounts paid by the city are
employee contributions and are paid by the city to satisfy the employee's
obligation to contribute the current.percentage of salary to P.E.R.S. An
employee has no option to receive the contributed amounts directly instead
of having them paid by the city to P.E.R.S. on behalf of the employee. It
is further understood and agreed that the payment of the employee's P.E.R.S.
contribution is made subject to I.R.S. approval and reporting procedures.
Section G Vacation
Vacation leave is governed by Section 2708.7 of the Municipal Code except that
it may be taken after the completion of the sixth calendar month of service
since the benefit date. Vacation leave shall be accrued as earned each payroll
period up to a maximum of twice the annual accrual rate. However, if the
City Administrator determines that a management employee has been unable
to take vacation due to the press of city business, the City Administrator
may increase the accrual limits or once annually authorize payment for one -half
of the excess accumulation up to a maximum of five (5) days. In addition to
vacation leave the City Administrator may grant up to five (5) days of
administrative leave to department heads for special training or recuperation
purposes. The City Attorney shall receive seventeen (1.7) days paid vacation
per year..
-3-
Section H Holidays
The twelve (12) holidays as provided by M.O.U. for the general employees'
association shall apply to management personnel.
Section -I Sick Leave
Sick leave is governed by Section 2708.5 of the Municipal Code. An employee
may take up to two (2) days per year of sick leave if required to be away from
the job to personally care for a member of his /her immediate family as defined
in Section 2708.5. This may be extended to five (5) days per year if the family
member is part of the employee's household, and to seven (7) days if a household
family member is hospitalized and the employee submits written verification of
such hospitalization.
Upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage of the
dollar value of the employee's accumulated sick leave will be paid to the
employee, or the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries according to the
following schedule:
(A) Death - 25%
(B) Retirement and actual commencement of PERS benefits:
(1) After ten (10) years of continuous employment - 10%
(2) After twenty (20) years of continuous employment - 15%
Section J Workers' Compensation Leave
An employee who is absent from duty because of on- the -job injury Sn accordance
with the state workers' compensation law and is not eligible for disability
payments under Labor Code Section 4850 shall be paid the difference between
his base salary and the amount provided by workers' compensation law during
the first ninety (90) business days of such temporary disability absence.
Eligibility for workers' compensation leave requires an open workers'
compensation claim.
-4-
Section K Vehicle Assignment
For those management personnel who require the use of an automobile on a
regular 24 -hour basis to perform their normal duties, the city will, at city
option, provide a city vehicle or an appropriate allowance for the employee's
use of a personal automobile. The use of a personal automobile for city
business beyond the three - county area (San Luis Obispo, Monterey and
Santa Barbara) will be eligible for mileage reimbursement in accordance
with standard city policy.
On mot -ion of Councilman Bond seconded by Councilman Dunin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Bond, Dunin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Settle
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of
August 1981.
Personnel Director
-5-
r " "�� � � -
�����y �� ��'
F� =c ��G
i��YSp n n �'�
U
RESOLUTION NO. 4716 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO UPHOLDING THE POLICE CHIEF'S DISMISSAL OF
SIDNEY BARTHOLOW FROM HIS POSITION AS POLICE OFFICER'
WHEREAS, on June 24, 1981, City of San Luis Obispo Chief of Police
Roger Neuman served Police Officer Sidney Bartholow (hereinafter,
"Appellant ") with a document entitled "Notice of Proposed Dismissal from
Employment with the City of San Luis Obispo Police Department" consti-
tuting the allegations of charges, reasons and supporting materials for
the dismissal of Appellant as an officer with the San Luis Obispo Police
Department; and
WHEREAS, Appellant made a response to the above -noted document and
denied the charges; and
WHEREAS, Chief Neuman, having considered the response and denial,
finally dismissed Appellant; and
WHEREAS, Appellant appealed the dismissal to the City Personnel Board,
which held an open hearing on the appeal on September 9, 10, 15, 16 and 17,
1981, Appellant being present at the heat=ing represented by Attorney
Arthur J. Shaw, Chief Neuman being present at the hearing represented by
Attorney James Duenow; and
WHEREAS, the Personnel Board made certain findings, conclusions and,
based thereon, made a recommendation to the City Council that Appellant's
appeal be denied; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the findings, conclusions and
recommendations of the Personnel Board (a written 6 page document attached
hereto as Exhibit.A) and has reviewed the record (testimony and exhibits)
of the Personnel Board's hearing on appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in agreement with the recommendation of
the Personnel Board that the appeal be denied;
R 4716
Resolution No. 4716
Page 2
(1982 Series) 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Having reviewed the materials as described hereinabove,
the Council hereby adopts as its own the findings 1 through 7 of the
Personnel Board, set out as "FACTS" 1 through 7 on pages 1 -3 of the
attached Exhibit A, and specifically so finds. "FACT" 8 (pages 3 -4, Exhibit
A) is specifically not adopted as a finding of this Council..
SECTION 2. Having.made the findings set out in SECTION 1, immediately
above and based thereon, the Council hereby adopts as its own the
"CONCLUSIONS" set out on page 4 of the attached Exhibit A, and so concludes.
SECTION 3. Based on the findings and conclusions set out in SECTIONS
1 and 2, immediately above, the Council hereby determines and orders that
the dismissal of Appellant by Chief Neuman was proper and, therefore,
denies Appellant's appeal therefrom. (The Personnel Board's observations
concerning the impropriety of discipline other than termination= -pages 5 -6,
Exhibit A, attached- -are noted and adopted by reference here.)
SECTION 4. This resolution shall be filed with the City Clerk, who
is directed immediately to provide copies to Sidney Bartholow, Arthur J. Shaw,
James Duenow, Chief Roger Neuman, the Personnel Director and members of the
Personnel Board.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Councilman Settle ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:. Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES:.' Councilman Griffin
ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 4716 (1982 Series).
Page 3
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 11th day of January ,
1982.
ATTEST:
v
CITY CLERK PAMELA 0 S
pa"�'L i)L-4n
City Administrati a Officer
City Attorney
.
}
tax
BEFORE THE PERSONNEL BOARD
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI,SPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF ) FINDINGS
SYDNEY BARTHOLOW FROM DISMISSAL ) CONCLUSIONS
AND
BY POLICE CHIEF ROGER L. NEUMAN ) RECOMMENDATIONS
Having considered the memorandum from Police Chief Roger Neuman, entitled
Notice of Proposed Dismissal from Employment with the City of San Luis
Obispo.Police Department, dated June 24, 1981, as constituting the
allegations of charges and reasons for the dismissal of Sydney Bartholow
(hereinafter, "Appellant ") from the Police Department of the City of
San Luis Obispo and having considered Appellant's responses and denial
of the charges; having considered Appellant's notice of appeal and having
held an open hearing. on Appellant's,appeal on September-'9, September 10,
September 15, September 16 and September 17; Appellant having been present
at all times during the hearings and represented by Attorney Arthur J. Shaw,
and Police Chief Roger Neuman represented at all times during the hearings
by James Duenow; Appellant previously having been informed of his rights
under Skelley v. State Personnel Board (1975) Cal.3d 194; having fully
considered all of the evidence at the hearing, both oral and documentary, the
Personnel Board does hereby make the following findings,.conclusions and
recommendation:
FACTS
1. The Board finds that Sydney Bartholow has been employed as a Police
Officer by the City of San Luis Obispo.Police Department since
- February 1, 1974.
2. Prior to the instant action Officer Bartholow has not been the
subject of disciplinary action during his tenure with the Police
Department.
n
3. From on or about January, 1981 Officer Sydney Bartholow had numerous
conversations with Officer Terry Young concerning Young's plan to
commit the crime of armed robbery including solicitation of Bartholow's
participation therein.
4. The Board finds that Officer Bartholow had a duty to report the
conduct of Officer Young to one or more of his superior officers,
and that he failed in this duty. The Board finds that although
Officer Bartholow repeatedly testified that he did not believe
Officer Young was serious about committing a felony, the prepon-
derance of the evidence contradicts his testimony. The Board
finds, as shown by the following evidence, that a responsible and
prudent police officer should have believed Officer Young was,
serious in his solicitation to commit armed robbery.
a. Officer Bartholow had knowledge that Officer Young had
recruited Officer Barrett to commit the crime of armed
robbery.
b. Officer Bartholow at no time stated to Officer Barrett that
he believed that Officer Young was not serious in soliciting
fellow police officers to commit the crime of armed robbery.
C. officer Bartholow's repeated testimony that he attempted to
talk Officer Young out of the commission of the crime implicitly
contradicts his testimony that he never believed Officer Young
was serious, for there would be no need to talk someone out
of criminal activity if they were not believed to be serious.
d. Officer Bartholow's admission that he suffered worried and-
anxious moments and had sleepless nights worrying about the
plan, from which fact it may be inferred that Officer Bartholow
believed Officer Young to be serious.
-2-
e. Admissions in the record by Officer Bartholow expressly stating
that he believed Officer Young to be serious about the plan.
(As contained in Exhibit "G ", page 27).
f. Testimony by Officer Bartholow that on or about,January, 1981
through on or about June 1, 1981, Officer Young repeatedly
and frequently brought up the subject of the plan to commit
the crime of armed robbery.
g. Officer Bartholow's admission that details of the plan were
discussed with Officer Young. (As contained in Exhibit "I ".)
5. The Board finds that Officer Bartholow failed to report the conduct
of Officer Young because his friendship with Officer Young took
precedence in Officer Bartholow's mind over his duties as a police
officer.
6. Officer Bartholow failed to understand that the Police Department's
Code of Conduct established an objective standard of conduct to
be referred to and followed, rather than the subjective judgment
of an individual officer.
7. The Board finds that Officer Bartholow had a duty to report Officer
Young's conduct no later than the time of his knowledge that Officer
Barrett had also been solicited to commit the crime of armed
robbery by Officer Young. Said solicitation occurred on May 28, 1981. The
Board finds that a prudent officer would have reported the conduct
of Officer Young prior to the time Officer Barrett was solicited
based upon the facts, circumstances, and inferences available to
Officer Bartholow.
8. The Board finds with respect to portions of the interview of Officer
Bartholow conducted on June 18, 1981, that Officer Bartholow was
not accorded rights guaranteed to him by the Peace Officer
Procedural Bill of Rights Act, specifically sections 3303(b),(f) and (h)
-3-
At that point in the interview when Police Chief Roger Neuman
and Captain Englert entered the interview room, the interview
ceased to be solely concerned with alleged criminal activities.
The questions asked of Officer Bartholow by Chief Neuman and
Captain Englert were directed almost entirely to why Officer
Bartholow failed to report Officer Young and not to the criminal
investigation of Young's solicitation.
The Board finds that any deprivation of rights at the June 18,
1981 interview were unintentional. We do not believe that this
procedural violation was of significant magnitude to warrant a
change in the discipline given by Chief Neuman. This is because
there was an overwhelming preponderance of evidence obtained.
prior to the June 18, 1981 interview justifying the suspension
and termination.
CONCLUSIONS
Therefore, as a result of the findings specified above, the Personnel
Board concludes that the conduct of Officer Bartholow has violated
each and every section of the Municipal Code and the Police Department
Personnel Manual of Rules and Regulations entitled "Standard of Conduct"
as more specifically set forth in the memorandum of June 24, 1981
entitled: "Notice of Proposed Dismissal from Employment with the City
of San Luis Obispo Police Department" from Roger Neuman to Sydney
Bartholow, a copy which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference. Therefore, the Board concludes that each of the
charges supporting the disiplinary action are substantiated by the
preponderance of the evidence.
-4-
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings and conclusions set out above, the Personnel
Board recommends to the City Council that the appeal of Sydney Bartholow
be denied and that his termination as a police officer be upheld.
The Personnel Board specifically considered discipline other than
termination. However, the Personnel Board concludes that discipline
other than termination is inappropriate for the following reasons:
1. Officer Bartholow committed a clear, serious violation of the
standard of conduct referred to in the notice of discipline when
he failed to report the solicitation to commit a felony made to
him by Officer Young.
2. The conduct of Officer Bartholow in failing to report Officer
Young for soliciting criminal activity discredits and dishonors
the Police Department and the City of San Luis Obispo.
3. Police Officers have been given a public trust to uphold the law.
A police officer violates that trust when he learns of planned
criminal activity, and fails to report it. A police officer has
the sworn duty to follow the highest standard of conduct in the
enforcement of the law.
4. The Board finds insufficient extenuating circumstances to justify
a lesser disciplinary action. E.g., Officer Bartholow expressed
no contrition as to his conduct. In addition, and most importantly,
although Officer Bartholow claims he attempted to counsel Officer
Young away from his purported plans, at no time did he clearly and
unequivocally tell Officer Young that what he was proposing was
unlawful; that he had a duty to report him if he did not stop
soliciting him. The only conclusion that this Board can
-5-
i
draw from these uncontradicted facts is that officer Bartholow
simply did not understand what his duty as a police officer was,
but acted in a confused manner prompted primarily by friendship
with Officer Young.
The following Board members adopt the above findings, conclusions,
and recommendations:
Peg P Vard, Chairperson
Lary C" pbell, Member
Z
David Hughes, Memb
..Larry Voss, Member
Procedural errors and other errors irrepairably damage the
disciplinary. process in this case.
It is the judgment of the undersigned that the appellant was
denied "due.process" in the disciplinary action and, therefore,
the disciplinary action should not be upheld.
4 Are
Wi iam J. H ricks, Member
i�c
?cc��nv�e
3p�•���cW
thoch e �
RESOLUTION NO. 4715 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO.'
INCREASING PARKING FUND APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 1981/82
FISCAL YEAR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that the
following appropriation account be increased to provide for contract
conversion of the downtown parking meter timing mechanisms.
ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
(50) 51 -6713 -310 Parking Meters $ 14,000.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Councilman Dunin ,
and on-the following roll call vote.;
AYES: '- Councilmembers Dovey, Dunin,'Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES' Councilman Settle
ABSENT:,' None
the foregoing Resolution was-passed and adopted this 11th day of January
1982.
ATTEST:
CITY L_ERK PAM V E
APPROVED:
- P, , �,,
City Adam "iriistra`tive Officek
City Attorney
* * * * * * * * * *
R 4715
7 k
P �y 0
gory\
rf" .1 _ i ro P
i
RESOLUTION NO. 4714 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
LAGUNA LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Community Development Director determined that
implementation of the Laguna Lake Management Program may have a significant
effect on the environment and required the preparation of an environmental impact
repdort (EIR); and
WHEREAS the city hired Envicom Inc., an independent consultant, to prepare
the management plan and a draft and final EIR which spells out the consequences
of the city carrying out the proposed plan; and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR was published in August 1981 and a 45 -day public
review period was established to allow for comment on the contents of the draft
report; and
WHEREAS, Envicom, Inc., has prepared written responses to all comments
received during the public review period. These comments and responses are
incorporated into the final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo City Council has held a public hearing to
review and consider the final EIR for the Laguna Lake Management Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
the following:
SECTION 1. The final EIR for the Laguna Lake Management Plan (attached as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference) is hereby certified as complete and in
compliance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and the City and State EIR Guidelines.
SECTION 2. Where determined feasible, mitigation measures suggested in the
final EIR (or other equally effective measure) will be incorporated into the
design of the Management Plan to eliminate signficant environmental effect or
R 4714
Resolution No.4714(1982 Series)
Page 2
reduce them to insignicant levels..
SECTION 3. A copy of the final EIR shall be filed with the City Clerk and
copies made available at the San Luis Obispo Community Development Department and
the City- County Library in San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Councilman Dunin , seconded by Councilman Sett1P
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was pased and adopted this 5th day of January
1982
APPROVED:
Administrative Officer
..
City Attorney
Community D velopme 0 irector
row
- `nU1C0�✓`
-) .
it
RESOLUTION NO. 4713 (19 82 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE ATTACHED TRAFFIC ORDERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
1. The attached Traffic Work Orders for the period of October 1, 1981
through December 31, 1981 are approved.
On motion of Councilman Settle ,seconded by Councilman Griffin ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 5tb_ day of .Tam,ary
19 82.
ATTEST:
WF00
1 D; IFIEVITO
* is 4c * 9c is
APPROVED:
L5
City Administrative Offi er
y
City Attorney
City Engineer
R 4713
TRAPPiC ORDER FoUl
i
DATE. TAKEN TO 1'UBLI.0 SERVICES: 10 -5 -81. MIPLETED- -0000V
LOCATION_
i{
II
I
Slack Street between Grand Avenue and easterly end of street
i RE-QUESTED BY:
q
Wayne_A. Peterson, City Engineer
UGSCRIP`fION:
Install "NO PARKING" signs on North side of Slack Street between
Grand Avenue and the easterly end of the street.
t
y ayne A. Peterson
t City Engineer.
;I
WAP:jlw
c.c. R. Gorda info
i
4
OArh IA1,HN Tn I'llBiJ(: sl:i:vlola; 10 -6 -81 j
j I
77 WGWI"I oN
j Woodbridge. Street At Meadow
II
Wayne Peterson .
� In;ticr.11•rruta:
I -
Install a "Stop. Sign" on Woodbridge at Meadow for stopping westbound
Woodbridge traffic. Eastbound traffic is already 'stopped.
.f •
d
1
Wayne A. Peterson. -
.. City Engineer
c.c., R.. A. � �n
WAP:jIw
1I '
i
i,
0
i.
OM I.: 'I 1;N1 T() I'l-IG 1, 1 1,",, 1 CES: 10-6-81
LOCA I MN -
Johnson Avenue & Palm Street
Wayne A. Peterson.
I 1"I, LON
Install 20 feet of red
the approaches to,Pa.lm
curbing on.,Johnson Avenue on both sides of
Street (see diagram below).
FIT
a r Z. JOINSON 190
F+ &-F
c.c. R. Gordon
WAP: I
Wayne A. Peterson
City Engineer
It,�rr. 'r,�rr:� 'l:u I rRl,.l.c: "SC.rv[crSt .10 -8 -81 corn -
- -
Santa Rosa Street between Monterey Street and Palm Street
�1
I RIa2U1:: l'i;ll BY
City Council, Resolution No. 4454 (1981 Series)
I PT LOO
+. Install "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs to existing sign posts -
remove.meter posts (see attached drawing).
j;
1{
ii
It
Richard. A. Gord '
.i
Engineering Associate Traffic
Attachment
i RAG: j.lw
{
,r
DG.pr
le
rl
TRAFFIC OR-DER
FOJUI
DATE- TAKEN TO
PUBLIC SERVICES:
COMPLETED:
LOCATION:.
Madbnna Road
at Freeway
101 offramp
BY:
Police
DLSCRIPTION:
-install 35 mph sign as
indicated on
the attached aerial photo print.
DG.pr
le
rl
Y •
a C1
3
y
I
n;�rr; Inrl:rl I„ I,i;l,rc srrvu;Ia:10 -23 =81 cc, >>rl.l:"rl:(:'_�
i
I.nI:A'f I nP�:
San Luis Drive at California Avenue
' 1
I' 1j) Isv:
Richard A. Gordon
Install 12" x 18" sign below stop sign stopping southbound San Luis
Drive with the legend "Oncoming Traffic Does Not Stop ".
1811 —,,
Oncoming
12" Traffic
i I Does Not
I - - Stop
' BLACK ON WHITE
Richard A. Gordon
Engineering Associate; Traffic
RAG:jlw
)ATIP: 1'I'J",IC S1."kVICES: 10-8-81 COMPUTED:
I,OCATI (:r,:
San Luis Drive and California Street
REIQUI.-ISTED BY:
Richard A. Gordon and
San Luis Obispo police Department
ON:
Install R49L and R49R as indicated on the attached aerial photo.
Attachment
A. Got on
ichar A.
Engineering Associate Traffic
RAG:jlw
tv
a
y
� 1
0
I, I(.. SERV.LG[SS :10- 1:3 -81 (Oi[I'LI'.'I'I ;h;
J.L
[
w
1.0(;A'1 I (lid:
2156 Sierra Way
i
✓ I
,
q i [
1 I
County of SLO, G. Johnson, Associate capital Projects Coordinator
i
uhsc.l: l 1 1•1,1.ON
Install a handicapped' parking space, complete with sign:
Ii
,j
V� — -. $Iva
4 � l
j2.0 •�'�. �(.. w +b -}, <i1 i i vii
tc.. Z-c;'1 84sNs s y �ttV�S
ij
I
'I 1•11\ I. i(: (IN I I! I: H 11:1 1
I)AIT" TAKEN T()� I'IJ K 1, 1 G LKV ICES
k0GAT1.01q:
Garden Street near Pismo Street
San Luis Obispo Fire Department
M."SCR I 11T LON:
Install a sign with the legend "RESERVED FIRE VEHICLE ONLY". HR 413
(Hawkins Catalog) as indicated below.
RAG:pr
-Dzvir Ui
To F. D. ILI vt W
R"&
iA Iz Lk 1�)
Si r 4
Ize 5 (S av k%-
LGS 1,7
y13
S�ccial Sled
Richard A-. Gordon
Engineering Associate - Traffic
;`.'..- M E M 0 R A N D :U _M .
in. - h61 U 9 101,,
TO: Roger Neuman, Police.Chief Jam!
CXJ CCI l�ol J,
FROM; R'icha.rd L. Minor, .Fire Chief
DATE: October 8 1981 o S:;rl LU a (�;:fd
GO ENGINEER
SUBJECT; Parking of Fire Apparatus Ce1�
9ZSZbZ£Z22
One of your alert officers brought a parking problem to our attention
recently as it regards the parking of fire engines at Station 1
Due to the limited space in the area, we are forced to park the
pumpers on Garden Street near the intersection of Pismo. Since the
apparatus is parked in a red zone-, it was anticipated that there
would be some difficulty if an accident.aro"e. In approaching the
City Attorney, it was his indication via Chief Call.away that the
matter could best be handled by simply labeling the parking "For
Fire Departm'e3i't Use Only ". We will coordinate this through the Traf-
fic Engineer in the next few days, which should resolve the issue.
Thanks, Roger, for your department's interest.
RLIM: vrd
cc, B/C Gallaway
Dick Gordon, Traffic Engineer
O
Y•
Y
PR;iI l•7;. UI\DI, :1\ 1`0kiI
.o
uAT1,:- TAKI;N TO PUB1,1C SI, -J VICeS:.11. -3 -81 COMPLe•rt D:
'a
I.oc:AT I ONI :
i Chorro Street between Walnut and Lincoln (west side)
4
City Council
!i
I � I>GSCltll''I'COiJ: -
li
Post "No Parking Any Time" signs in this location..
r
1 Richard- A -. Go "rd -
Engineering Associate - Traffic
{ RAG:jlw
• e.
i
t
I 7 •�
I;
t =
9'
i
{ 1)AIT" ' AKHN To I•.lmm,.c: sl!:livlas :10 -29 =81 c:oRN,ETED:
I,OCWI ION-:
,1
Flora Street and Laurel Lane
(
1
MIJI II:S I I:U, By:
R. Brockman -Cal Trans -
i
Install: Yellow center line 60 ft. as indicated on the
sketch.below, around curve.
Flora St.
Ij
Flora St.,
i ro� NSTALL
el low center line
60'
�2
Richard A. Gordan LaEngineering Associate - Traffic
all
of i
OATVI TAKEN D) ITM,1C SEIRVICE'S: 10-29-81 com
1,0(;A'l I ON:
Casadnro at San Luis Drive
R. A. Gordon
1) I'l 1; C i) i i 'T I
Paint 50' yellow "sk.ipdash".cphter Linn;
rl
.50,
;>
yell ow
center
line
Cu
IL
San Luis Drive
RicHard A. Ge(ndon
Engineering Associate -.,Traffic
ell
r Wil
)A 1 K E N T 111TIM: S1;kV1.C'E'S* 10-12-81 cmwu:
1,0CA1 ION:
Johnson Avenue at Southwood Drive
1a:Qtjl:,;TED By.:
Art Hird
DFISC. P I PTf ON:
Relocate Bus Stop as indicated below
JV
Urge
5f¢ I I .
- - 4 J 67
70
'AV
Richard A. Gordon
RAG'jlw En,gineering Associate Traffic
7
I
I HA'1'IS 'IAI:E N "l:)) I'I!ijI,LG Sl ?I\V1(;Gs: 10 -8 -81
WCA•r) curl:
Various locations listed below
1 lil:O(llir l'I;U BY:
San Luis Obispo Police'Department
i
I 1)1':SCk I l "1'ION .
Install off stre6Tvehicle signs. as follows:
1. 1 Sign - Loomis St. north of Santa Ynez Drive
2. 1 Sign - End of BlOrd:: -Del Campo
3. 1 Sign PARK
4. 2 .Signs- Sinsheimer Park Area 3Ks 4 f/.V. �„het:,loT
5, 2 Signs- Terrace MIT Area 4 so,v'^4,e�°f
fYAV /'0. GT -0- asp C~dp
1
2- RxR 0 tsarWAL 4- 6 C14GKT7' tP.
Call_ Officer Bruce La liargue for exact locations on Ext. 8642
at the P.D.
1
1 y
e
Richard A.. GordoSY
Engineering Associate - Traffic
RAG:jlw .
+
I,
i '
LOCATION:
Higu6ra Street between Johnson Avenue and Tom Street
BY*.
Dave--Romero
1) E* S C R I 11, tom -
Change pave*m-ent.markings to conform to the attached aerial
photo drawing-.
Transition from two (2) lanes to three (3) lanes;
Attachment Aerial photo
RAG:jlw
All.
ix
Richard-A. Gordon
Engineering Associate, Traffic
DMI-;
TAkEN 'It)
PlIBLiC
SEKVLGGS•
1 0"6 -81
LOCATION:
Higu6ra Street between Johnson Avenue and Tom Street
BY*.
Dave--Romero
1) E* S C R I 11, tom -
Change pave*m-ent.markings to conform to the attached aerial
photo drawing-.
Transition from two (2) lanes to three (3) lanes;
Attachment Aerial photo
RAG:jlw
All.
ix
Richard-A. Gordon
Engineering Associate, Traffic
a
9
S
i
,3
l
i
l
i
•111A ric 01WE'R UORM
DATE, TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES.: 9 -T =811 CORPLCTED:
LOGATTON:-
Oceanaire Drive @ Lakeview
Avalon (both ends), Balboa, Drake Circle, and Galleon Way.
KE'QULSTen B
San Luis Obispo Police Department ('Bruce LaHargoue, Traffic Officer).
DEISCR1.1 TtON:
7brO-4 6 R 39
Install yield signs on "T" intersecting streets with Oceanaire Drive.
R. A. Gordon L`
Engineering Associate - Traffic
, o
i
e
f
ii
Ii
10-.21-81.
Palm Street - 800 Block
Shanghai Low Restaurant (861 Palm)'
Dave Romero
1)F1.(;Ck I PT[ ON:
Paint loading zone driveway in front . of garage red at this
location.
RAG: j I w
Garage I Shanghai Low
1311
1
...... 40 40
P
ain * t. Existing Yel low
Red Loading Zone
PALM STREET
I I
Rich6rd.A. Gordon
Engineering Associate, Traffic
C
TRAFFIC ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES? 11 -19 -81 COMPLETED:_ — l
LOCATION:.
Walnut Street Exit for P. D. Parking Lot
REQUESTED BY:
San Lufis Obispo Police Department
DESCkIPTION;.
Paint Red Curb as Indicated on the Drawing .Below
Paint Red
Curb
EXIT
,
N
48'
Paint- Red Curb
ichard A.. Gordon
Engineering Associate - Traffic
Concur:
Wayne Peterson
City Engineer
RAG: jIw
TRAFFIC ot?j)e;R roi�rt
DATE 'TAKEN.T'O PUBLIC SEINICES,: 9 725 -81 COr LETED:
LOCATION:
.California @ Monterey
hEqueSTEU,BY:
Wayne A, Peterson
UESCRIPI'ION:.
Paint.4 bike lanes.for 50.',as indicated on the
drawing below.
C�cc.tfo�t��A �
I . b'i iCr JQNP•t '
V
M gRnArc Y
1�4 l/V
4 Fr
2611ce
R. A: ordon
Engineering Associate
Traffic
FT5
>1
r '
//////1•
m
TRAFFIC ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN: To 'PUBLIC SERVICES: 11-19-81 COMPLETED:
LOCATION:
Broad Street at Mission Lane
REQUESTED BY:
.Dave Romero
DESCRIPTION:
Change parking restrictions as indicated below:'
AWNW1
INSTALL
OK No Parking
Here to
Stop
RI Corner
R26B
35'
STREET N
J
R,01.scate post N
N REMOVE INSTILL—,—
o R 26B Rep,'
No parking 17c 7e
betw'ben signs
No.:Pdrki �n�g N.P-A-J
Here 6 with
ith
: -,Corner
A
Ei Vdon
RAG:jlw Engineering Associate Traffic
TRnrrrc -ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SEIRVICEIIS:1,1-18-81 COMPLETED :
LOCATION:
Gr'and Avenue between Hays and McCollum and Abbott and Garfield
REQUESTED BY:
Dave Romero
DESCRIPTION:
Remove red curb marking as indicated on attached aerial photo prints,
and marked on the curb in the field.
Attachments as stated
RAG:jlw
e.
K. A. borcl&
Engineering Associate Traffic
TRAFFIC ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 11 -18 -81 COMPLETED:.
LOCATION:
South Higuera Northbound at.Elks Lane
REQUESTED BY:
Dave Romero
DESCRIPTION:
INSTALL (W 11 Sign)
Lane drop for N.B_: traffic location marked in the field
150' from Elks Lane end of striping for L.T. Lane -. .
W11RT'
Richard A. Gordo'
o•
Engineering Associate - Traffic
RAG:jlw
�fi-
SS
1 OATI:L TAKEN D1YUBL IC SI::IZVLCLS:
1
iI
9 -11 -81 COMPLULU:
I
L0CA' LON
V` Santa Rosa & Foothill
— cam.
Santa Rosa & Hi ghl and
!
o QA 5---& _ V-J
ri;rzut. 'ri;n By.
Approved by R Bruckman
of Caltrans
S
�t
ri
uesCal IIT10111
Paint markers.for bike,:signal
actuation at.these locations.
R. A. Gordon : '
j�
Engineering Asso ate - Traffic
i L
' I i RAG:jlw
1
TRAFFIC ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES
October 16, 1980
COMPLETED:
LOCATION:
1
Johnson and Monterey
t
REQUESTED BY:
Dave Romero
DESCRIPTION:
Paint S -E approach of Johnson at Monterey as follows:
n
A.
A* M
Ike d
- ;lo Cyn
�"� ' Or
uArl; inl:l:i� •I:u ru�si.lc sl.i:vrcl,s: J15 =81 co,lrl.l:rl;l): '•...: ;�
1.0 CAI t) r:
Chorro Street commercial loading zone by Sebastians Restaurant.
'I
f •
I(LOI;ir'; I I;D. BY:
Wayne Peterson
I
1)I {tiClt I I'7'1Uld:
Replace existing signs (2) with the following signr placed back to back:
s 7i¢itC�•,rt.' p v y ,� c l R c G
N 0 P A.R F I N G
A N Y T I M E Red on I•Jhite
1 CMERCIAL.LOADING _
ALLOWED
. Yellow on Whitey
24 v: AiiM to , 3 `PM
KAK
Richard . GPM
�. Engineering Associate - Traffic
c� o
TRAFFIC ORDER FORM
DATE.TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 12 =2 =81 COMPLETED:
LOCATION:
Johnson Avenue (east side) between Gregory Court and Southwood Drive
REQUESTED BY:
Richard A. Gordon
DESCRIPTION:
Remove post and sign W 11 as i'ndieated on this drawing below:
N-
:p' �oNNsaN (}UE,
JA
REMOVE °
G
N
o SIG.
o .
�
t/ �'
_ G
e
Concur:
City' Engineer Peterson Richard A. Gord
Engineeri'ng,Associate - Traffic
RAG:jlw K ��
6164 P
ta-3 6 Aq at
sy At 1 60401y
'I RAI I IC ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC SERVICES: 12-4-81' COMPLETED: /z/
LOCAL ION.
Pismo Street at Santa Rosa Street
REQUESTED BY:
Frank Canaan --SLO Resident
DESCRIPTION:
Install 25 MPH speed signs and paint 25 on Pavement as indicated
on the drawing.below.-
LO
Pismo C"i
LO
C 0 N C U R
Wjyne Pe[terson-
Ci ty Engineer,
RAG-.j1w
Santa
Rosa
Fr-
SjO�wi4t!<.
Richard A. Gordon
Engineering ing Asso iate Traffic
4�-z-
Ila
ORDER FORM
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC.SE RVICES: 127 4= 81 COMPLETED:
LOCATION:
1820 Hays Street
REQUESTED BY:
City Council for L. Jacobson (CC Meeting of Dec 1, 1981)
bESL-;R.IPTION:
Paint red curb,as indicated on the sketch beloW:
1820 Hays St.
!Zr
Hays St. 151
'Concur:
Wayne Peterson
City Engineer
RAG; i i w
V
dolz�
,Ridh-ard A. Go'd6n
Engineering Associate Traffic
r F I C ORDER FORM.
DATE TAKEN TO PUBLIC -SERVICES: 12"11-81 COMPLETED:
.LOCATION:
Swa.zey Street cul -de -sac
REQUESTED BY:
Jerry Kenny.; Engineering
DESCRIPTION:
Red curb cul-de-sac on Swazey Street as.per Agreement dated
6 May 1980 , Item No. 5 (between "Ochs." and City), Resolution
No. 4156 (1980 Series) (attached).
Cbnc ur, WW vne A.-
.yne_ Peterson Richard A. GordoK
City Engineer Engineering Associate Traffic
Attachment
RAG:jlw
e.
7<<(f
Ro mcco ��
MEETING AGENDA
. - - -- DATE SAN gz ITEM #
A G E 1) - i� REi.0RT
TO: City Administrative Officer FOR COU"ICIL MEETING OF: January 5, 1982
BY: Wayne Peterson, City En ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution
SUBJECT
Traffic Work Orders for Period of October.l, 1981 through December 31, 1981.
RECOMMENDATION
Recgmmend Council adopt Resolution approving Traffic Work Orders for the
period of October 1, 1981 through December 31, 1981.
DISCUSSION.
None
(attachments) Traffic Work Orders (Completed) for 10/1/81 - 12/31/81
BUDGET I.IPACT
Minor operating expgnses.
C.C. Dave Romero (w /out attach)
C-7-1
RESOLUTION NO..4Z12 (1932`Ser;ies)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO REQUIRING SIDEWALK IMPROVE
-MENTS ON PORTIONS OF CARPENTER AND ORANGE
STREETS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
1. That the Council hereby preliminarily determines that the public
interest, necessity and convenience require the construction of curb and
gutter, sidewalk and driveway ramp improvements on those portions of streets
within the City of San Luis Obispo as set forth on Exhibit "A "attached hereto
and incorporated by reference.
2. That Februar;y.2; 1982
Hall, 990 Palen Street, San Lui
set for public hearing on said
twice in the Telegram- Tribune,
the first publication to be at
of said notice shall be posted
Code Section 7350.1(b).
:at 7:05 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City
s Obispo, California, is the time and place
matter., and notice thereof shall be publi.shed''
a newspaper of general circulation in said City;
least twenty days prior to said hearing. Copies
in accordance with the requirements of Municipal
3. That subject to any modifications or exceptions declared by the Council
at the close of said hearing, said parcels shall be so improved by the property
owner, or the City Engineer shall proceed to have the work done and the cost
therof shall be made alien against the property in accordance with Sections
7350 et seq. of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.
On motion of Councilman Settle -- seconded by Councilman Griffins
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Bllig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R 4712
Resolution No. 4712
the following resolution was passed and adopted this
January
ATTEST:
, 1982.
/�Z6 vte4,S,
CITY C ERK PAKELA VO S
APPROVED:
Gixe a �YYJ f _
City Admin-istrativ Offi er
i //L�
City Attorney
Pu is Sery ces Director
42s " � , e4&1 ?IFJZ 4
F nance Direc
(1982 Series)
5th
YO LANIE C. BILLIG
day of
EXHIBIT "A"
C = Curb & Gutter
S = Sidewalk
R = Driveway Ramp
IMPROVEMENTS
OWNER
LOCATION
PARCEL NO.
REQUIRED
McCapes, A.M., Etal
215 Hathway Ave.
(Carpenter
Side)
52- 072 -02
S &
R
Jones, J.P., Etal
135 Carpenter Street
52- 072 -25
S &
C
Swart, R.H. & S.G.
111 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -01
S"
Gray, G.J.
133 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -10
S
Johnson; A.C. & E.V.
151 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -11
S
Rogoway, N.A. & L.M.
159 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -12
S &
R
Chou, T.T. & L.T.
171 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -13
S
Caylor, G.M. & F.B.
191 Orange
Drive
52- 091 -15
S
Campbell, R.D. & C.
1256/1254 Bond St.
(Orange Drive
side)
52- 092 -16
S
Fierstine, H.L. & R.R.
172 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -09
S
Howe, H.E.
164 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -08
S
Carte, L.S. & O.L.
148 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -06
S
Green, W.M. & B.L.
138 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -05
S
Tallman, R.W. & D.
130 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -04
S &
R
Wright, D.S., Etal
110 Orange
Drive
52- 092 -01
S &
R
FOc
CtAt1 t-
RESOLUTION NO. 4711 (1982 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF TNTENTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF CHURCH
STREET BETWEEN SANTA BARBARA STREET AND OSOS STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. It is the intention of the City of San Luis Obispo to abandon
a portion of Church Street as shown on the map marked "Exhibit A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by such reference, pursuant to Division 9, Part
3, Chapter 2 of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 2. Copies of the map and agreement showing the particulars of the
proposed abandonment are also on file in the office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 3. Tuesday, February 2, 1982, at 7:10 p.m., in the Council
Chamber of the City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, is the
time and place set for hearing all persons interested in or objecting to the
proposed abandonment, which time is not less than fifteen (15) days from the
passage of this resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolution, together with the ayes and noes, shall be
published once in full, at least three (3) days before the public hearing on
the proposed abandonment, in the Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper published and
circulated in this city.
SECTION 5. The City Engineer shall post at least three (3) notices..of
the proposed abandonment along that portion of the street proposed to be abandoned
at least ten (10); days before the date set for hearing in accordance with
Section 8322 of the Streets and Highways Code.
R 4711
Resolution No. 4711 (1982 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 6. The proceeding to be taken will be subject to reservation by
the city of public easements for utilities and water as shown on the map
marked "Exhibit .A" attached, and subject to such other conditions as the Council
deems appropriate.
SECTION 7. The City Engineer shall notify utility companies affected by
the proposed abandonment at least ten (10) days before the date set for hearing
in accordance with Section 8347 of the Streets and Highways Code.
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilman Griffin ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of January ,
1982. -t
ayor a anie C. Billig
ATTEST:
City Ferk Pa±eld Vges
APP ;D:
OU
Q Vy,,5
Administrative Officdbr
City Attorney
Community D velopme Director
r
City Engineer
N I
EW,
— M
4()N
/ 30
n•
LEGEND:
41
10
CITY
li ja
Aj
PARK
z7.z 4zw \
ENTI STREET
TO IPC AE5ER
PUB 1C UT( L1
in
1 � I
,I
W
I
I I
1
I I I
.�I
I
X3.0 I
FOR
PULSES
II �
I
- c-cr�—
STREET
PTT ppM.TION OF STREET � EXHIBIT "A" GA5 -- T� E5E ABANLbNEb
SEVVEIR - - -- ALE T.v-
WATER - --
EL<=C. o • • -
APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER DATE CHURCH STREET
i+
REVISIONS BY APP DATE A DAN DOM MENT
'
51 ,r.�, BETWEEN
0 :
it SAIJTA BAR8ARA AVr=40� S-1-
Ktv�� lie u e �•
�pM[CO
7T- de, v1 f
9
4� -.
n
RESOLUTION NO. 4710 (1982 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND I.C.M.A. RETIREMENT CORPORATION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain,agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A"
and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis Obispo and
I.C.M.A. Retirement Corporation to provide continued participation in the
Deferred Compensation Plan for the City Administrative Officer.is hereby
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and
a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: I.C.M.A. - R.C.
Personnel Department
Finance Department
City Administrative Officer
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilman Griffin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Griffin, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 5th day of January
1982.
MAY LAME C. BILLIG
ATTEST:
4�Ll'e �'/
CITY CLERK PAMELA GE
R 4710
n
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
/ I�—
City Attorney
Personnel Director
01
AO
C Appendix 1
INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
RETIREMENT CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Amended as of June 28, 1974 and March 23, 1979
It is hereby agreed that this DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN shall be in effect on the date upon which the Employer has caused it to be
executed by an official affixing his signature on behalf of the Governing Body in the space provided below. However, the DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN will not be legally binding upon the International City Management Association Retirement Corporation until a Notice of
Plan Acceptance has been supplied by it.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Legal Name of the
Attest for the Employer. or the Employer: _
By
Signaturg of Authorized Official Signature ow uthorized Official
City Clerk C) / i
Melanie Billig, Mayor
Print Name and Title
SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIOR TO COMPLETING THIS SECTION
Complete the following prior to mailing this Agreement to the Retirement Corporation.
Full Name (City of, County of, etc.) City of San Luis Obispo, CA
Title of Official to whom correspondence and reports. are to be mailed:
(not name) Personnel Director _
Address: (include zipcode) P. 0. Box 321 San Luis Obispo, 93406
Employers' Federal Tax Identification Number. 95- 6000781
How often will you make contributions? Monthly
What is the date of your first contribution? February 25, 1982
Total Number of Employees:_ 265 Number of employees eligible to participate: I
Check One
❑ New Agreement Amendmen( 'revious Agreement
❑ Change of Beneficiary Only . - I o'
we
City of San Luis Obispo
J ER AGREEMENT
T ICMA Retirement Corporation deterred
tdmpensation pian.
Print Name of Employer
Mr. (] Ms. Ej Mrs. ❑ Miss First fuddle Last
From: Full Name Paul
AMOUNT OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION
NOTICE: Effective January 1, 1979. federal law prohibits any person from
deferring more than 25% of total compensation or 57.900. whichever is
lower. Total compensation is your salary. including any amounts deferred.
Effective on the payday shown below, I desire to be paid, in the form of
deferred compensation, as follows:
Payday on which plan is to begin February 7, 1982
1 948.O�o. Day Yr.
?Jy current salary is $ _ ' . - per pay period.
am paid every (2 weeks, month, 15 days, etc.): Semi mnnthI y
SSENTIAL EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Sex: [X M ❑ F Date of Birth
Job Title
ra
A.
Lanspery
ALLOCATION TO INVESTMENT FUNDS
I request that the total amounts of deferred compensation be apolieo to the
available investment funds in -the following percentages (See IClAA -RC =,n-
nual Report for discussion of funds):
anti
14�n ?.ilia•; ,y
B:da „«•,: i „rip
i
50
Method of Designating
(Employee's
(Employers
13
Deferted Compensation
Contribution)
Comnbution)
Total
(Use Only One)
Base pay snail be
Base pay shall be
I
reputed by
added to by
pt) Percentage fdetrtoci
°°
(2) Dollar Metnod
s 135.00
s
Is 135.00
(per pay period)
-
Payday on which plan is to begin February 7, 1982
1 948.O�o. Day Yr.
?Jy current salary is $ _ ' . - per pay period.
am paid every (2 weeks, month, 15 days, etc.): Semi mnnthI y
SSENTIAL EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Sex: [X M ❑ F Date of Birth
Job Title
ra
A.
Lanspery
ALLOCATION TO INVESTMENT FUNDS
I request that the total amounts of deferred compensation be apolieo to the
available investment funds in -the following percentages (See IClAA -RC =,n-
nual Report for discussion of funds):
anti
14�n ?.ilia•; ,y
B:da „«•,: i „rip
i
50
Bunn Fund•
25
r „rid _
13
cu.iidnit•ed Ini,:,,1.,1 i ,:n,,
12
I understand that where state or local law restricts the nature of the invest-
ment of these funds that it wiil be necessary to restrict the investment choice
to those available under the law.
Social Security Number Fi_TE�] — ®— 53TO 9 -1511
Department - Administration
Home Address 1812 Alrita, San Luis Obispo, California 9 3 -74T--7 0_
No. Street City State Zip
DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY (See Instructions)
Note: When amending your agreement do not complete this section unless you wish to change beneficiaries.
To whom shall the proceeds be payable in case of your death? Give first name, middle initial, and last name: Mary A. Relationship to you.
Smith (not Mrs. John Smith). For your children, you may simply use the term "My Children” and leave the Date of Date of Birth i.e.. wife, son, daughter.
Birth and Relationship columns blank. This term will provide equal treatment among your children— present and Mo., Day Year (If none, state whether
future —born of arty and all marriages and any children legally adopted at any time. friend: creditor, etc.)
Primary Beneficiary(ies) (Class 1):
Contingent Senefieiary(ies) (Class 11), if any:
The right to change beneficiaries is reserved to me.
NOTE: If no Primary Beneficiary (Class 1) is living at time of your death, the proceeds are payable to the Contingent
Beneficiary(ies) (Class 11). If a Class includes more than one person, the proceeds are divided equally
among the living beneficiaries of the Class.
FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS
The undersigned hereby applies for participation in the ICMA Retirement Corporation deferred compensation plan as established by my employer. I
understand my participation is subject to my employer's agreement, given below, and will be governed by the plan document, its amendments. and this
ment, including the general provisions appearing on the reverse side. I have read paragraph a on the reverse side of this agreement, and certify that the
arro t I have said I want to defer does not exceed 25% of my total compensation or $7,500• whichever is lower.
E pi ee Signatur E e p oval wand A
Sign fe Date Signatu a of uthorizetl Official
*You cannot sign your own Joinder Agreement for employer approval. It you Melanie B 1i Ma or
also act as your employer's authorized official, have another employee au-
thonzed to sign your agreement. Print Name and Title o tcial
(over)
RESOLUTION NO. 4709 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO APPROVING USE PERMIT U1007 ON APPEAL
OF MR. DANIEL HALL (PUBLIC SPA,' 3279 BROAD STREET)
WHEREAS, Daniel Hall ( "Applicant ") has appealed Planning Commission denial of
a use permit (U1007) for a public spa at 3279 Broad Street; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has as part of his appeal submitted a revised site plan
which mitigates the noise, privacy and parking concerns which led to the denial by
the Planning Commission on November 11, 1981; and
WHEREAS, this council has considered the minutes of the Planning Commission,
and updated staff report, supplementary materials and testimony at its public hearing
held on December 15, 1981.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Based on the materials and statements set out above, the council
finds as follows:
1. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare
of persons living or working in the area.
2. The proposed project is appropriate at the proposed location and will be compatible
with surrounding land uses.
3. The proposed project conforms to the general plan.
4. The project meets zoning ordinance requirements.
5'.. The project is categorically exempt from environmental impact determination.
SECTION 2. Based on the findings set out in Section 1, the council hereby
approves use permit application no. U1007 subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall provide noise shields for mechanical equipment so that the
noise at the site property lines does not exceed 60 Ldn to the approval of the
Community Development Department staff.
2. Applicant shall plant two street trees to city standards along Broad Street
frontage to the approval of the Public Services Department. Tree type and
location shall be to the approval of the Architectural Review Commission.
3. Applicant shall install a 6 -foot integral sidewalk along Broad Street frontage,
to the approval of the Public Services Department.
Resolution No. 4709
Page 2
n
J' (1981 Series)
4. A minimum of 13 automobile parking spaces, one of which shall be a handicap
parking space, shall be provided and maintained for intended use at all times.
Applicant .shall install a bicycle rack to the approval of the Architectural
Review Commission.
5. Existing willow and pepper trees on -site shall be maintained and safety pruned
to the approval of the Public Services Department.
6. Applicant shall submit a landscape plan, providing dense landscaping for
screening adjacent properties, to the Architectural Review Commission for
approval.
7. Applicant shall maintain existing city sewer line easement on -"site as required
by the Public Services Department.
8. Applicant shall grant the city an easement over the creek channel for drainage
and maintenance purposes, to the approval of the City Engineer.
9. Applicant shall clean, widen and improve creek channel to handle a design
frequency storm, to city standards and to the approval of the City Engineer.
10. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold on the premises at any time.
11. Use of spa shall be limited to the hours of 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m, on
Sunday through Thursday and-11 :00 a.m, to 1:00.a.m. on Friday and Saturday.
12. Use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission if any reasonable
written citizen or Police Department complaints are received by the city.
In review of the use permit, the Planning Commission may add, delete or
modify conditions of approval or may revoke the use permit.
13. The property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. All plant
materials shall .be maintained and dead plants replaced as necessary.
On motion of Councilman Dunin, seconded by Councilman Settle, and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dunin, Settle, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted.this 15th day of December, 1981
U
Ma o Me anie Billig
ATTEST:
Cit Clerk Pam a Vo s
c" 0
Resolution No. 4709
Page 3
APPROVED:
City Administrative OfWcer
ty Attorney
(1981 Series)
��l �
��. yatl
Q
,��
RESOLUTION NO. 4708 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DOWNTOWN PARKING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Community Development Director determined that
implementation of the city's Downtown Parking Program, which includes the con-
struction of a multi -story parking garage on the corner of Palm.and Morro Streets,
may have a significant effect on the environment and required the preparation of
a focused environmental impact report (EIR); and
WHEREAS, the City hired Earth Metrics Inc., an independent consultant, to
prepare both a draft and final EIR which spells out the consequences of the City
carrying out the proposed parking program; and
WHEREAS, the draft EIR was published in October, 1981, and a 30 -day public
review period was established to allow for comment on the contents of the draft
report; and
WHEREAS, Earth Metrics Inc. has prepared written responses to all comments
received during the public review period. These comments and responses are'incor-
porated into the final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo City Council has held two public hearings to
review and consider the draft and final EIR for the Downtown Parking Program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
the following:
SECTION 1. The final EIR for the Downtown Parking Program (attached as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference) is hereby certified as complete and in
compliance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the City and State EIR Guidelines.
SECTION 2. Where determined feasible, mitigation measures suggested in the
final EIR (or other equally effective measure) will be incorporated into the
design of the Parking Program to eliminate significant environmental effects or
R 4708
Resolution No. 4708
Page 2
reduce them to insignificant levels.
SECTION 3. A copy of the Final EIR shall be filed with the City Clerk
and copies made available at the San Luis Obispo Community Development Department
and the City - County Library in San Luis Obispo.,
On motion of Councilman Griffin , seconded by Councilman Settle ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Settle, Dovey, Dunin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of December , 1981,
ATTEST:
City lerk Pamela fogeV
Approved as to form:
i A/7 D
City Attorney
TS:drs
Mayor Me anie C. Billig
Approved as to content.:
V\
rn• Coa
-C��i1 +1CC�
�1
re
M
RESOLUTION NO. 4707(1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF AMENDED TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR
SUBDIVISION 80 -155 LOCATED AT 920, 932 AND 950 OLIVE STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the
amended tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 80 -155 and the Planning
Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes
the following findings:
1. The amended parcel map and design are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the proposed type and density of
development which is permitted by the C —T zone.
3. The design is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause
serious health problems.
4. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with public
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
5. The amended parcel map is categorically exempt from environmental
requirements.
SECTION 2. Conditions. That the approval of the amended tentative map for
Minor Subdivision 80 -155 be subject to the following condition:
1. Subdivider shall grant to the city a creek easement from Stenner Creek 5
feet beyond the top of the bank to maintain the creek in its present
condition and to permit improvements to the creek. Determination of the
easement shall be based on a field survey and cross sections of the creek as
required by the City Engineer.
R 4707
U,
Resolution No.4707(1981 Series)
Minor Subdivision 80 -155
Page 2
On motion of Councilman Settles , seconded by Councilman Dunin ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dunin, Dovey, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of December ,
1981.
ATTEST:
Ci clerk Pamela oges
APPROVED
ting Administrative 0 iicer
A _Y
City Attorney
Community Dev lopment D rector
�1
�� � e '-
g �m � ��� �� : -
-�, � �,,,,�. ��cn� u5
-�
r;
RESOLUTION NO. 4706 (1981 Series}
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR
SUBDIVISION 81 -212 LOCATED AT 124 HIGHLAND DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the
tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 81 -212 and the Planning.Commission's
recommendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following
findings:
1. The proposed parcel map and design are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the proposed type and density of
development which is permitted by the zone.
3. The design is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause
serious health problems.
4. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with public
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
5. The proposed parcel map is granted a negative declaration on environmental
impact based on information about tree locations on site which was
provided.
SECTION 2. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative map for Minor
Subdivision 81 -212 be subject to the following conditions:
1. Subdivider shall provide individual water and sewer service and utilities
for each lot.
2. Subdivider shall install landscape planting along front slope bank adjacent
to the sidewalk for slope stabilization, pursuant to landscape planting plan
to be approved by Community Development Department staff. The plan may
include a small footing wall at the toe of the slope if determined to be
required by Public Services and Community Development Department staff.
3. Subdivider shall install or relocate pressure zone water valve in Highland
Drive to connect existing fire hydrant to adjacent pressure zone, to the
approval of the Public Services Department prior to any combustible
construction on the site. Individual water services shall have pressure
regulators, if determined to be appropriate by city utilities engineer.
R 4706
J;
Resolution No. 4706 (1981 Series)
Minor Subdivision 81 --212
Page 2
4. A note shall be placed on the final map stating that all of the lots in the
subdivision are declared sensitive sites and new construction or
modification to existing improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the
Architectural Review Commission.
5. Subdivider shall repair existing driveway ramp to the approval of the Public
Services Department.
6. All driveway improvements and buildings to be removed, according to the
approved map, shall be removed prior to recordation of the final parcel
map.
7. Lots in the subdivision shall have a 6 foot interior property line setback.
Said line shall be shown as such on the final map.
8. All trees on the site shall be retained except as otherwise authorized by
the Community Development Director.
9. A note shall be placed on the final map stating that buildings on all three
lots shall be limited to single —story or split —level design and wood
shingled roofs are prohibited.
10. Subdivider shall provide two parking spaces to city standards for lot 2.
11. Final map shall show access to lot 1, 2 and 3 by way of a common driveway to
the approval of the Community Development Director. Subdivider shall
install said driveway and record a common driveway agreement for said
driveway, consistent with with parking and driveway standards, prior to
final map approval.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Councilman Dunin
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Dunin, Griffin, Settle and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of December
1981.
ATTEST:
d /
City Clerk Famelafoges
Resolution No. 4706 (1981 Series)
Minor Subdivision 81 -212
Page 3
APPROVED:
�.. k4t4::�::
ting Administrative 0 icer
V
City Attorney
4LCV�o-A FVVN�
Community Dev lopment ruector
�vtgr�,
RESOLUTION N0.4705(1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR
SUBDIVISION 81 -225 LOCATED AT 345 MARSH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of the
tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 81 -225 and the Planning Commission's
recommendations, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following
findings:
1. The proposed parcel map and design are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the proposed type and density of
development which is permitted by the C -R zone.
3. The design is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause
serious health problems.
4. The design of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with public
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
5. The proposed parcel map is categorically exempt from environmental
requirements.
SECTION 2. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative map for Minor
Subdivision 81 -225 be subject to the following condition:.
1. Subdivider shall repair and replace sidewalk on Archer Street to the
approval of the Public Services Department.
R 4705
�1
Resolution No. 4705(1981 Series)
Minor Subdivision 81 -225
Page 2
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dov y ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of December ,
1981.
'Mayor Me anie C. Billig
ATTEST:
City C r rk Pamela Voge
APPROVED
Acting Administrative gfficer
City Attorney
449rm,-A
Community Dev N opment Di ector
7-t(e
RESOLUTION NO. 4704 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND ANNE M -. RUSSELL FOR LEGAL SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A"
and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis Obispo and
Anne M. Russell
is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and
a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: Anne M. Russell and
City Finance Director.
On motion -of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of December , 1981.
R 4704
II! ! III I I(I'lll'��I�I�II
� II II
OEM--
���:
n.., ,, 0 La
_:
�i
Exhibit A
city of i. s o is o
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Post Office Boz 321 — San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 — 805/541 -1000
November 24, 19.81
Anne M. Russell
598 Princeton Place
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Dear.Ms. Russell:
This letter will confirm our understanding to extend to
June 30, 1982, our June 11, 1981, agreement whereby you
per -form as directed legal work. Your compensation will
be $15.00/hour effective January 1, 1982; until then,
your compensation shall remain at $12.00 /hr.. All other
terms and conditions of our June 11, 1981 letter agreement.
(copy attached) Are understood to apply here as well.
You will be acting as a free and.independent contractor,
not as a city employee.
If you are in agreement with these terms, please sign
on the line provided below.
Very truly yours,
George C. Thacher
City Attorney
GCT /lp
Anne Mc Russell
On
I .
�i�►�H7fi��f i�llillllll liil �� p;i,,�b�������! ►, ;�I i; it
i= W�
II
I
city of san luis ouspo
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Post Office Box 321 —San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 — 805/541 -7000
June 11, 1981
Anne M. Russell
598 Princeton Place
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Dear Ms. Russell:
:u' »:'•:- This letter will confirm our agreement that you will be performing
;,��- ,..,,• as directed legal work for my office. Your compensation will be
$12.00 /hour. You will be acting as a free and independent con-
tractor, not as a city employee. As such, you will not accrue,
be compensated for or be eligible for vacation leave, sick leave,
unemployment insurance, workers compensation, medical or other
insurance, or other benefits normally offered by the city.
This agreement is effective as of the date of this letter and
will terminate on December 31, 1981; provided, that you or the
city may terminate it at any time before that date by giving thirty
days written notice to the other party.
The city will provide office space, supplies and secretarial
services.
By close of work on Friday of each week during which you perform
services under this agreement you should submit a statement of
services and hours for that week. You will be paid on the regular
cycle for contract and other billing payments - twice a month.
As we discussed, I expect that you will be working approximately
3/5 (60 %) full time -- about 24 hours a week. We canrGchedule
your time flexibly and, if necessary, you can do some of the work
at home.
If you are in agreement with these terms, please sign on the line
provided below.
Very truly yours,
George C. Thacher
City Attorney
GCT /lp
�r-- OC
nre M. Busse
RESOLUTION NO. 4703 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO VOCAL ARTS ENSEMBLE
FOR CITY TO PAY ASSOCIATION $1,000.00 TO BE
EXPENDED FOR 1981 -82 CONCERT SEASON
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo_ as
follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis
Obispo and San Luis Obispo Vocal Arts Ensemble is hereby approved and
the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution
and a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: San Luis Obispo
Vocal Arts Ensemble; City Finance Director
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of
December , 1981.
ATTEST:
V
CYTY CLERK PAMELA OGES
R 4703
r
APPROVED:
Exhibit A
A G R E E M E N T
TO ACCOMPANY GRANT BY THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO TO CULTURAL, ARTISTIC OR
EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1981 -82
This agreement, made and entered into this 15th day of December ,
1981 , by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a chartered municipal
corporation, (referred to herein as "City ") and SAN LUIS OBISPO VOCAL
ARTS ENSEMBLE (referred to herein as "Association ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to sponsor and support activities of a
cultural, artistic, and.educational nature for the benefit of the City's
residents and for the promotion of the City as an inviting place for
visitors and tourists; and
WHEREAS, Association has demonstrated its ability to provide a
program which contributes to the quality of life in San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, Association has requested City to grant it funds to
conduct its program, all as set forth in Exhibit 1 application attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
1. City agrees to pay Association the sum of $1,000.00, to be
expended for 1981 -82 concert season.
2. On or before April 15, 1982, Association will provide City. with
a detailed statement of its income and expenses for the previous twelve-
month period ending March 31, 1982.
3. Association and all of its agents, representatives, and
participants in any manner in the performance of Association's
obligations and duties hereunder shall be employees, independent
contractors or volunteers for Association and shall not.for any purpose
a;
be considered as employees or agents of City. Association agrees to
hold City harmless and to defend City in any action, proceeding, or
hearing wherein the cause of action or claim is based upon an allegation
that any person acting on behalf of Association or the Association
itself is an employee or agent of the City, including limitation, all
actions and claims based upon contract, tort, or statutory provisions.
4. For purpose of notice under this Agreement, all notices shall
be considered effective upon being sent by certified mail to the
following addresses:
City: Office of the City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 321
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
_ Association: SLO Vocal Arts Ensemble
172 Indian Knob Road
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
by their proper officers duly authorized, as of the date first written
above.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK PAMELA VOG S
ASSOCIATION:
SLO VOCAL ARTS ENSEMBLE
BY:
C !MAYOR 0 SAN LUIS OBISPO
B
T LAME C. BILLIG
10
Exhibit 1 EETING AGENDA
REQUEST FOR PROMOTIONAL FL'VDS LiATE eyu si ITEM # a-.s
(See Reverse)
Date Sept. 23, 1981
1. Name and legal description of organization or group
San Luis Vocal Arts Ensemble -(a community choir)
2. Address 172 Indian. Knob Road State Tax I.D.#
Federal Tax I.D.# LA:E0:79 -2051
3. Amount of funds requested S1, 500.
4. Whom to contact if more information is required Shel Burrell
i Telephone # 595 -2212
5. Date, Time and Place of proposed event Concerts: Dec. 18 1 19 s 20, May 14, 15, 16t
Concerts on Dec. 19th and May 15th will be in the Mission 000
6. Is this request for a non - repayable grant ED or a repayable grant?
7. Attach a budget showing the specific uses of requested funds.
See item attached
7.a If the budget request involves remuneration to any members or employees of
the organization for other than expenses, a full written justification must
be attached. -
See item attached
8. Attach a complete report including profit and loss statement and balance
sheet for the previous year.
See item attached
9. If this group or organization is part of a larger group or organization,
complete financial data of parent organization must be furnished. L?pp affiliations.
10. Have you sought other sources or private contributions to support this program
or event? If so, identify these sources. California Arts Council -D ending,
a7:aoe ticket sales and patrons.
11. If this a fund raising program or event? Tickets will be sold for 34 at the doo
83 presale, and S2 roi- scnior citizens and children.
12. If profit is derived, how will it be used? TO he1D pay the salaries of our
conductor and accompanist,. and other budgeted expenses.
13. How will this program or event be promoted? Radio, T.V.rand newspaper spots,
mailed announcements, and posters.
14. If this is to be a continuing activity or a recurring event, please attach
a projection for the next five years.
---------- - - - - -- FOR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------- - - - - --
PROMOTIONAL COMMITTEE ACTION
Date Received 9 /J' X'/
Date Considered "I //"v Ar'/
Action:
Amt. recommended to Council -,Z/ "717)
Further Instructions:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Considered / ')// /�' /
Action:
Payment Method
Amount budgeted Code
1. No change in the program as regards expenditures of funds received may occur
without notification and approval by the P.C.C.
2. Cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce in the promotion of this event is
required.
3. Information on how to apply for tax exempt status for organizations may be
obtained at your local I.R.C. office.
P.C.C. 7/80
as-1
�a� �- '� -
���2�-
-:��.
RESOLUTION NO. 4702 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SYMPHONY
ASSOCIATION FOR CITY TO PAY ASSOCIATION $59000.00
TO BE EXPENDED FOR 1981 =82 CONCERT SEASON
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis
Obispo and San Luis Obispo County Symphony Association is hereby
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION.2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution
and a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: San.Luis Obispo
County Symphony Association; City Finance Director
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovev ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of
December 198L
J
j
MAYOR MELANIE C. BILLIG
ATTEST:
- - 4Z4
CIjY CLERK PAMEL 1A VQetS
R 4702
APPROVED
k n.
ty Administrative Owicer
City Attorney
F naac � Di efor
"S l I 1 U l L. [1
1 C •
A G R E E M E N T
TO ACCOMPANY GRANT BY THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO TO CULTURAL, ARTISTIC OR
EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1981 -82
This agreement, made and entered into this 15th day of December ,
1981 , by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a chartered municipal
corporation, (referred to herein as "City ") and SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION (referred to herein as "Association ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to sponsor and support activities of a
cultural, artistic, and educational nature for the benefit of the City's
residents and for the promotion of the City as an inviting place for
visitors and tourists; and
WHEREAS, Association has demonstrated its ability to provide a
program which contributes to the quality of life in San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, Association has requested City to grant it funds to
conduct its program, all as set forth in Exhibit 1 application attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
1. City agrees to pay Association the sum of $5,000.00, to be
expended for Pops Concert and 1981 -82 concert season.
2. On or before April 15, 1982, Association will provide City with
a detailed statement of its income and expenses for the previous twelve-
month period ending March 31, 1982.
3. Association and all of its agents, representatives, and
participants in any manner in the performance of Association's
obligations and duties hereunder shall be employees, independent
contractors or volunteers for Association and shall not for any purpose
be considered as employees or agents of City. Association agrees to
hold City harmless and to defend City in any action, proceeding, or
hearing wherein the cause of action or claim is based upon an allegation
that any person acting on behalf of Association or the Association
itself is an employee or agent of the City, including limitation, all
actions and claims based upon contract, tort, or statutory provisions.
4. For purpose of notice under this Agreement, all notices shall
be considered effective upon being sent by certified mail to the
following addresses:
City: Office of the City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 321
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Association: SLO County Symphony Association
P. 0. Box 658
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
by their proper officers duly authorized, as of the date first written
above.
ATTEST:
CIT CLERK PAMELA OPGW
ASSOCIATION:
SLO COUNTY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION
BY: GL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
r•
EI" ED
I- Exhibit 1
REQUEST FOR PROMOTIONAL FUNDS
(See Reverse)
MEETING AGENDA
ATE O--_8; ITEM
Date September 25, 1981
SEP 3
1. Name and legal description of organization or groups an Luis Obispo County
CITY Ci.:_?Kqymprony Q=ncia*i can
SAN LUIS OBIS ?0, C;, 266 -1227
2. Address v O Box 6 SR State Tax I.D.O
San Luis Obispo, CA 93404deral Tax I.D. ;EqS -74g31 d4
3. Amount of funds
4. Whom to contact
Telephone #_14
5. Date, Time and
6. Is this request
7. Attach a budget
requested $5,000,
if more information is required Ellen Pliun, V3epr -iiiive Director
1 -1 ;,Al
Place of proposed event 1481 -R? rnnncri- Canenn t ro
7 s- Cencert
for a non - repayable grant = or a repayable grant? L�
showing the specific uses of requested funds.
7.a If the budget request involves remuneration to any members or employees of
the organization for other than expenses, a full written justification must
be attached. NONE -
8. Attach a complete report including profit and loss statement and balance
sheet for the previous year. Currently being prepared by Knight, Towle
Sage & Johnson ...attached is year -end balance, sheet (unaudited)
9. If this group or organization is part of a larger group or organization,
complete financial data of parent organization must be furnished.
10. Have you sought other sources or private contributions to support this program
or event? If so, identify these sources. San Luis phi cpn rnynty-4=mgh8ny Guild,
individual & business donors, ticket sales, foundations
11. If this a fund raising program or event? n.
12. If profit is derived, how will it be used?
_Ma_guofit - the S =mphon-y�ves
to reach the break -even point each ryyear.
13. How will this program or event be promoted.
Direct mail, posters, advertising, PSA's (radio & TV)
14. If this is to be a continuing activity or a recurring event, please attach
a projection for the next five years.
FOR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY
PROMOTIONAL COMMITTEE ACTION
Date Received ?� -'., A/
Date Considered
Action:
Amt. recommended to Council ;5�5-/'rn
Further Instructions:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Considered
Action:
Xf
Payment Method
Amount budgeted
Code
1. No change in the program as regards expenditures of funds received may occur
without notification and approval by the P.C.C.
2. Cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce in the promotion of this event is
required.
3. Information on how to apply for tax exempt status for organizations may be
obtained at your local I.R.C. office.
P.C.C. 7/80
'c2. y
��
�.. .tu.y .�,�,_;f� ��tr.SCr.n��
RESOLUTION NO. 4701 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY BAND, INC. FOR
CITY TO PAY ASSOCIATION $19500.00 TO BE EXPENDED
FOR PERFORMANCES THROUGHOUT THE YEAR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City.of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis
Obispo and San Luis Obispo County Band, Inc., is hereby approved and the
Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution
and a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: San Luis Obispo
County Band, Inc.; City Finance Director
On mot -ion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of
December , 1981.
ATTEST:
"a."& /J,^
CI7 CLERK PAMELA OGe
R 4701
F122,11"t "I
�l�
0 1 0
strative,lfficer
L'n111U1L [\
A G R E E M E N T
TO ACCOMPANY GRANT BY THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO TO CULTURAL, ARTISTIC OR
EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1981 -82
This agreement', made and entered into this 15th day of December ,
1981 , by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a chartered municipal
corporation, (referred to herein as "City ") and SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
BAND, INC. (referred to herein as "Association ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to sponsor and support activities of a
cultural, artistic, and educational nature for the benefit of the City's
residents and for the promotion of the City as an inviting place for
visitors and tourists; and
WHEREAS, Association has demonstrated its ability to provide a
program which contributes to the quality of life in San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, Association has requested City to grant it funds to
conduct its program, all as set forth in Exhibit 1 application attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
1. City agrees to pay Association the sum of $1,500.00, to be
expended for performances throughout the year.
2. On or before April 15, 1982, Association will provides City with
a detailed statement of its income and expenses for the previous twelve-
month period ending March 31, 1982.
3. Association and all of its agents, representatives, and
participants in any manner in the performance of Association's
obligations and duties hereunder shall be employees, independent
contractors or volunteers for Association and shall not for any purpose
I
be considered as employees or agents of City. Association agrees to
hold City harmless and to defend City in any action, proceeding, or
hearing wherein the cause of action or claim is based upon an allegation
that any person acting on behalf of Association or the Association
itself is an employee or agent of the City, including limitation, all
actions and claims based upon contract, tort, or statutory provisions.
4. For purpose of notice under this Agreement,, all notices shall
be considered effective upon being sent by certified.mail to the
following addresses:
City: Office of the City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 321
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Association:
SLO County Band, Inc.
P. 0. Box 62
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
by their proper officers duly authorized, as of the date first written
above.
ATTEST:
CI CLERK PAMELA 0
ASSOCIATION:
SLO COUNTY BAND, INC.
BY: JL1S.
�TL'E.as.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
a
B _ � � y
R MELANIF. BILLIG
a
• n . Y
P
Exhibit 1
REQUEST FOR PROMOTIONAL FU`,'DS
(See Reverse)
Date
*I��TlNG
A i E pcT
Ser.temher 8 1��1
1. Name and legal description of organization or group :;an Luis Ob�sr.o
County Bared, Inc.
AGENDA
ITEM # C_:L�
2. Address P.O. Box 62, S.L.O. , Cal. State Tax I.D.# D- 6329820 5140c
93406 Federal Tax I.D.% 95- 2816351
3. Amount of funds requested t 19800.00
4. whom to contact if more information is required
Telephone # 50-4-963
Jon Hollister , Treasurer
J
5. Date, Time and Place of proposed event The Wand performs 25 - 30 times
throughout the year.
6. Is this request for a non - repayable grant F-6-1 or a repayable grant? L�
7. Attach a budget showing the specific uses of requested funds.
See pa.ge 1.
7.a If the budget request involves remuneration to any members or employees of
the organization for other than expenses, a full written justification must
be attached. See pie 2.
8. Attach a complete report including profit and loss statement and balance
sheet for the previous year.
See page 3.
9. If this group or organization is part of a larger group or organization,
complete financial data of parent organization must be furnished.
" N/A
10. Have you sought other sources or private contributions to support this program
or event? If so, identify these sources. Yes. County of San Luis- Obispo,
the band G1so receives donations from some.of it's performances.
11. If this a fund raising program or event? N0.
12. If profit is derived, how will it be used? The band is a non - profit organizatic
any profit would be used defray operating exrenses and upgrade quality.
13. How will this program or event be promoted? The srecial p'roups the band plays
for usually handle the promotion of their event. Band sponsored concerts
are publicized primarily in local newspapers.
14. If this is to be a continuing activity or a recurring event, please attach
a projection for the next five years.
See page 4.
----------------- - - - - -- FOR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------- - - - - --
PROMOTIONAL COMMITTEE ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Received ��� /��� Date Considered J//
Considered i //i 7 /Y Action: '7!i
i I L/
Action:
Payment Method
Amt. recommended to Council Amount budgeted Code
—T
Further Instructions:
1. No change in the program as regards expenditures of funds received may occur
without notification and approval by the P.C.C.
2. Cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce in the p;om1Z1cE t t4 Vet 1)
required. t
3. Information on how to apply for tax exempt status for orgaftfji �nTgEfy be
obtained at your local I.R.C. office. JJ 11
P.C.C. 7/80
CITY CLERK
SAN LUIS OBISPO,. CF+
02.3 V
�.u`�ti•`w'`�Q ``
�`
I
RESOLUTION NO. 4700 (1981 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUISw_OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE CAL POLY MUSTANG BOOSTER CLUB FOR
CITY TO PAY ASSOCIATION $750.00 TO BE EXPENDED
FOR ATHLETIC SCHOLARSHIPS FOR 1982
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis
Obispo and Cal Poly Mustang Booster Club is hereby approved and the
Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution
and a copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: Cal Poly
Mustang Booster Club; City Finance Director
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey ,
and on the following roll call vote:.
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Dunin, Griffin and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of
December 1981.
ATTEST:
CIf CLERK PAMEL 0 S
f:'K4Ah]
APPROVED:
lell
Exhibit A
A G R E E M E N T
TO ACCOMPANY GRANT BY THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO TO CULTURAL, A OR
EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR RTISTIC
YEAR 1981 -82
red into this 15th day
of
This agreement, made and ente December ,
1981 by and between the CITY OF SAN
LUIS 0BISY0, a chartered municipal
(referred to herein as "City")
and CAL POLY MUSTANG BOOSTER
corporation,
CLUB (referred to herein as "Association ") -
14ITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to sponsor and support activities of a
Ural, artistic, and educational nature for the benefit of the City's
cult lace for
residents and for the promotion of the City as an inviting p
Visitors and tourists; and provide a -
WHEREAS, Association has demonstrated its ability to p _
f life in San Luis Obispo; and _ -- _-
program which contributes to the quality o
WHEREAS, Association has requested City to grant it funds to
conduct its program, all as set forth in Exhibit 1 application attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
a Association the sum of $750.00, to be
1, City agrees to pay "
expended for athletic scholarships. provide City with
2, On or before April 15, 1982, Association will p
nt of its income and expenses for the previous twelve-
a detailed stateme
month period ending March 31, 1982.
3, Association and all of its agents, representatives, and
participants in any manner in the performance of Association's
obligations and duties hereunder shall be employees, independent
contractors or volunteers for Association and shall not for any purpose
i
be considered as employees or agents of City. Association agrees to
hold City harmless and to defend City in any action, proceeding, or
hearing wherein the cause of action or claim is based upon ail allegation
that any person acting on behalf of Association or the Association
itself is an employee or agent of the City, including limitation, all
actions and claims based upon contract, tort, or statutory provisions.
4. For purpose of notice under this Agreement, all notices shall
be considered effective upon being sent by certified mail to the
following addresses:
City: Office of the City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 321
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
Association: Cal Poly Mustang Booster Club
P. 0. Box 838
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement
by their proper officers duly authorized, as of the date first written
above.
ATTEST:
4�2nz(z 6 es
CIr CLERK AMEL VO ES
ASSOCIATION:
CAL POLY MUSTANG BOOSTER CLUB
B
CITY qr'F SAN LUIS OBISPO
C
n Exhibit 1 �r4H ING AGENDA
.DATE
t;EST FOR PROMOTIONAL FUNDS � ocT ze �� NEVI
p (See Reverse)
SEP 3 o i';;' Date September 23, 1981
1. Name and 1 CJ q-_aS iption of organization or group MTTSTANr R((IG
1TF.R C'_T.TTg
A nofiA 41gJ 9 i tion which raises money to provide scholarships and
a e i gr n e e a o M pit feaZ ON 75 - Aq 10
( 2. Address P.O. Box 838, SLO, CA 934Mate Tax I.D.Ii03S9IJ5J,
r Federal Tax
3. Amount of funds requested $2400.00
4. Whom to contact if more information is required Lucinda Yates, Andrew Cone,
y Telephone if 544 -8990, 541 -2500, 546 -2923 Dic Heaton
5. Date, Time and Place of Droposed event N/A '
6. Is this request for a non - repayable grant 42Z] or a repayable grant? U
7. Attach a budget showing the specific uses of requested funds.
7.a If the budget request involves remuneration to any members or employees of
the organization for other than expenses, a full written justification must
be attached. N/A
8. Attach a complete report including profit and loss statement and balance
sheet for the previous year.
9. If this group or organization is part of a larger group or organization,
complete financial data of parent organization must be furnished.
N/A
10. Have you sought other sources or private contributions to support this program
or event? If so, identify these sources. Yes, We have an annual membership
drive to raise funds. Goal this year is.135,000
11. If this a fund raising program or event ?Yes, to provide scholarships and grant;
for Cal Poly athletes.
12. If profit is derived, how will it be used? To provide for scholarships and
grants for Cal Poly athletes.
13. How will this program or event be promoted? Media, direct mail and personal
contact by Booster membership team members to sell memberships and
aquire
14. If this is to be a continuing activity or a recurring event, please attach
a projection for the next five years. This is an - annual drive. We have no
projection for the next five years, but goals will be increased each year
----------------- - - - - -- FOR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY ----------------- - - - - --
PROMOTIONAL COMMITTEE ACTION
Date Received
Date Considered
Action:
Amt. recommended to Council 7
Further Instructions:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Considered
Action:
j/
Payment Method
Amount budgeted
Code
1. No change in the program as regards expenditures of funds received may occur
without notification and approval by the P.C.C.
2. Cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce in the p;omotion of this event is
required.
3. -Information on how to apply for tax exempt status for organizations may be
obtained at your local I.R.C. office.
P.C.C. 7/80
,,.a-/
I erim
p