HomeMy WebLinkAbout6150-6174RESOLUTION NO. 6174 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among
other positions, the City Attorney in the Appointed Officials Compensation
Plan (Resolution No. 6.169 (1987 Series]); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6171 (1987 Series), the City Council
established compensation for City Attorney Roger Picquet; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the
City Attorney under Section 2 of the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan
(Resolution No. 6169 [1987 Series]).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows;
SECTION 1. Effective July 1, 1986, the City Attorney's salary shall
increase from $4,600 per month to $4,819 per month.
SECTION 2. Effective on the pay date of January 15, 1987', the City
Attorney's salary shall increase from $4,819 per month to $4,867 per
month.
SECTION 3. The City shall contribute $250 to the City Attorney's ICMA
Retirement Corporation deferred compensation plan account as a performance
award for services rendered during fiscal year 1986 -87.
SECTION 4. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City
Attorney under the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution
No. 6169 [1987 Series]) , and under the City Attorney Employment Agreement
Resolution No. 6171 [1987 Series]), not superseded by the above shall
remain in full force and effect.
R 6174
Resolution No. 6174 (1987 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 5. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the
City Attorney at the mid -year review.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro =Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of February
1987.
MAYOR PRO -TEM ROBERT E!/ G FFIN
ATTES
P
CI CLERK PAMELA GES
APPROVED:
City Adt�/inistrati Officer
City At
Finance Di
axyy a2..t�
Personnel Director
`f
I
zo �
III
u,
RESOLUTION NO. 6173 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among
other positions, the City Administrative Officer in the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6169 [1987 Series]); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6170 (1987 Series), the City Council
established compensation for City Administrative Officer Paul A. Lanspery:
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the
City Administrative Officer under Section 2 of the Appointed Officials
Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6169 [1987 Series]).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Effective July 1, 1986, the City Administrative Officer's
salary shall increase from $5,100 per month to $5,342 per month.
SECTION 2. The City shall contribute $500 to the City Administrative
Officer's ICMA Retirement Corporation deferred compensation plan account
as a performance award for services rendered during fiscal year 1986 -87.
SECTION 3. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City
Administrative Officer under the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan
(Resolution No. 6169 [1987 Series]), and the City Administrative Officer
Employment Agreement (Resolution No. 6170 [1987 Series]), not superseded
by the above shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the
City Administrative Officer at the mid -year review.
R 6173
0
Resolution No. 6173 (1987 Series)
Page 2
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa
seconded by Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of February
1987.
ATTES : '
CI CLERK PAMELA V ES
s
APPROVED:
City Adm' fiistrat&W Officer
City Atto
Finance Direc/or
tub
Personnel Director
i %-t/ v yw/ I• v k-I -
MAYOR PRO -TEM ROBERT E�
1�
rl
RESOLUTION NO.6172 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO SETTING FORTH THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND PAMELA VOGES,
CITY CLERK, REGARDING COMPENSATION AND
RELATED MATTERS
WHEREAS, Charter Section 701 provides that the Council is responsible
for the appointment and removal of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, this Council acknowledges and accepts the responsibility for
supervision of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, Pamela Voges was appointed to the position of City Clerk by
Resolution No. 4516 (1981 Series); and
WHEREAS, the Council is committed to developing and promoting an
effective and professional Management Team, including the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the Council by resolution has established an Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan for certain positions including the City
Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the Council has evaluated the relevant compensation factors
for the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to adjust the compensation of the City
Clerk commensurate with the level of performance and consistent with the
goals and purposes of the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to address other matters relating to the
terms and conditions of employment for the City Clerk;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
R 6172
Resolution No. 6172 (1987 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 1. The appointment of Pamela Voges as City Clerk as of
June 9, 1981, is hereby confirmed and continued in full force and
effect.
SECTION 2. In consideration of Ms. Voges' acceptance of the above
confirmation of employment, this Council adopts the following employment
terms and conditions:
A. Effective Date.
July 1, 1986, shall be the effective date of this Agreement.
B. Termination and Severance Pay.
In the event Ms. Voges' employment is terminated by the Council
during such time that she is willing and able to perform the duties of
City Clerk the City agrees to pay her a lump sum cash payment equal to
three (3) months compensation (salary and all appointed officials fringe
benefits). Should Ms. Voges obtain employment during the three -month
period following termination, she shall reimburse City proportionately.
In the event that she is terminated for good cause then the City shall
have no obligation to pay the lump sum severance payment mentioned above.
In the event Ms. Voges voluntarily resigns her position with the City, she
shall give the Council at least one (1) month advance written notice.
C. Compensation
Ms. Voges' salary shall be established by Council resolution. This
salary may be adjusted by appropriate action of the Council at any time in
accordance with Section 6 of the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan.
All other compensation and benefits afforded under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan shall be in full force and effect.
Resolution No. 6172 (1987 Series)
Page 3
D. Outside Employment, Conduct.and Behavior.
(i) Ms. Voges may engage in outside activities such as part -time
teaching, consulting, or in other similar activities unrelated to City
business only with the express prior approval of the Council.
ii) Ms. Voges shall comply with all local and state requirements
regarding conflicts -of- interest and shall avoid personal involvement in
situations which are inconsistent or incompatible with the position of
City Clerk or give rise to the appearance of impropriety.
E. Professional Development.
City shall provide funds for certain items, activities and
materials deemed necessary and desirable for Ms. Voges' continued
professional development, participation, growth and advancement, and,
therefore, for the good of the City. Those items, activities and
materials shall include:
(i) Professional dues and subscriptions necessary for full
participation in appropriate and relevant associations and organizations.
(ii) Travel and subsistence expenses for professional meetings and
similar functions (e.g., short courses, institutes, seminars) to foster
professional development.
(iii) Others, as shall be agreed upon from time to time between
Ms. Voges and City.
F. Other Terms and Conditions of Employment.
The Council shall set any such other terms and conditions of
employment as it may determine from time to time, relating to the
performance of Ms. Voges, provided such terms and conditions are not
Resolution No. 6172 (1987 Series)
Page 4
inconsistent with or in conflict with the provisions of this resolution,
the City Charter or any other law.
G. General Provisions.
It is the intent of the Council that this agreement and the
appointment of Ms. Voges as City Clerk be in!accordance with the
requirements and provisions of the Charter. Wherever possible the
provisions of this resolution shall be construed in a manner consistent
with the Charter. If any provision of this resolution conflicts with the
Charter, the Charter shall control. An invalid provision of this
resolution is severable and shall not affect any other provision.
SECTION 3. Resolutions 4516 (1981 Series), and 5800 (1985 Series),
are hereby rescinded for administrative purposes.
Rappa
On motion of Councilwoman seconded by Councilman Settle and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17thday of February
1987. n
FFIN
0 3
Resolution No.6M (1987 Series)
Page 5
APPROVED:
City Admi strativ Officer
City Atto iey ,
Finance Di ctor
,alm� ava�
Personnel Director
l
%!� 11
RESOLUTION NO.6171 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO SETTING FORTH THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND ROGER PICQUET,
CITY ATTORNEY, REGARDING COMPENSATION AND
RELATED MATTERS
WHEREAS, Charter Section 701 provides that the Council is responsible
for the appointment and removal of the City Attorney; and
WHEREAS, this Council acknowledges and accepts the responsibility for
supervision of the City Attorney; and
WHEREAS, Roger Picquet was appointed to the position of City Attorney
by Resolution No. 5201 (1983 Series); and
WHEREAS, the Council is committed to developing and promoting an
effective and professional Management Team, including the City Attorney;
and
WHEREAS, the Council by resolution has established an Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan for certain positions including the City
Attorney; and
WHEREAS, the Council has evaluated the relevant compensation factors
for the City Attorney; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to adjust the compensation of the City
Attorney commensurate with the level of performance and consistent with
the goals and purposes of the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to address other matters relating to the
terms and conditions of employment for the City Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
R 6171
Resolution No. 6171 (1987 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 1. The appointment of Roger Picquet as City Attorney as of
October 3, 1983, is hereby confirmed and continued in full force and
effect.
SECTION 2. In consideration of Mr. Picquet's acceptance of the above
confirmation of employment, this Council adopts the following employment
terms and conditions:
A. Effective Date.
July 1, 1986, shall be the effective date of this Agreement.
B. Termination and Severance Pay.
In the event Mr. Picquet's employment is terminated by the Council
during such time that he is willing and able to perform the duties of City
Attorney the City agrees to pay him a lump sum cash payment equal to three
(3) months compensation (salary and all appointed officials fringe
benefits). Should Mr. Picquet obtain employment during the three -month
period following termination, he shall reimburse City proportionately. In
the event that he is terminated for good cause then the City shall have no
obligation to pay the lump sum severance payment mentioned above.. In the
event Mr.. Picquet voluntarily resigns his position with the City, he shall
give the Council at least one (1) month advance written notice.
C. Compensation
Mr. Picquet's salary shall be established by Council resolution.
This salary may be adjusted by appropriate action of the Council at any
time in accordance with Section 6 of the Appointed Officials Compensation
Plan.
All other compensation and benefits afforded under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan shall be in full force and effect.
Resolution No.6171 (1987 Series)
Page 3
D. Outside Employment, Conduct and Behavior.
(i) Mr. Picquet may engage in!outside activities such as part -time
teaching, consulting, or in other similar activities unrelated to City
business only with the express prior approval of the Council.
(ii) Mr. Picquet shall comply with all local and state requirements
regarding conflicts -of- interest and shall avoid personal involvement in
situations which are inconsistent or incompatible with the position of
City Attorney or give rise to the appearance of impropriety.
E. Professional Development.
City shall provide funds for certain items, activities and
materials deemed necessary and desirable for Mr. Picquet's continued
professional development, participation, growth and advancement, and,
therefore, for the good of the City. Those items, activities and
materials shall include:
(i) Professional dues and subscriptions necessary for full
participation inappropriate and relevant associations and organizations.
(ii) Travel and subsistence expenses for professional meetings and
similar functions (e.g., short courses, institutes, seminars) to foster
professional development.
(iii) Others, as shall be agreed upon'from time to time between
Mr. Picquet and City.
P. Naval Reserves.
The Council recognizes Mr. Picquet's status as an officer in the
U.S. Naval Reserve. Mr. Picquet agrees to use his best efforts in
scheduling his Naval Reserve commitments in such a manner so as to
minimize adverse impacts on the City.
Resolution No.6171 (1987 Series)
Page 4
G. Assistant City Attorney Salary Delegation
The City Council hereby delegates the authority to the City
Attorney to determine the salary of the Assistant City Attorney. The City
Attorney shall confer with the City Administrative Officer and the
Personnel Director prior to setting the salary and shall take into
consideration their comments as well as those factors recited by the City
Council in establishing the Management Compensation Plan.
H. Other Terms and Conditions of Employment.
The Council shall set any such other terms and conditions of
employment as it may determine from time to time, relating to the
performance of Mr. Picquet, provided such terms and conditions are not
inconsistent with or in conflict with the provisions of this resolution,
the City Charter or any other law.
I. General Provisions.
It is the intent of the Council that this agreement and the
appointment of Mr. Picquet as City Attorney be in accordance with the
requirements and provisions of the Charter. Wherever possible the
provisions of this resolution shall be construed in a manner consistent
with the Charter. If any provision of this resolution conflicts with the
Charter, the Charter shall control. An "invalid provision of this
resolution is severable and shall not affect any other provision.
SECTION 3. Resolutions 5201 (1983 Series), 5485 (1984 Series), and
5799 (1985 Series), are hereby rescinded for administrative purposes.
Resolution No. 6171 (1987 Series)
Page 5
Rappa
On motion! of Councilwoman seconded by Councilman Settle and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17thday of February
1987.
I� :• �
loe 0 �J 30E, 99256 Dill..
ATTE Q
CI Y CLERK PAMELA V ES
** m s s s s
APPROVED:
City Adm nistrati a Officer
City A
Finance Di ctor
Personnel Director
/�/ V � �� O
�-i ' `-C 'ti�`'� C�
�� � ,u.. c ,.;
!% y'�� f% ...
�y�f� '
V
.... ._. ,.♦ � .. ... �� .. ..�i_.. _. 1... .. �[
. A..
l i . l ... -
_` `..
RESOLUTION NO. 6170 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO SETTING FORTH THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND PAUL LANSPERY,
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, REGARDING
COMPENSATION AND RELATED MATTERS
WHEREAS, Charter Section 701 provides that the Council is responsible
for the appointment and removal of the City Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, this Council acknowledges and accepts the responsibility for
supervision of the City Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, Paul Lanspery was appointed to the position of City
Administrative Officer by Resolution No. 4689 (1981 Series); and
WHEREAS, the Council is committed to developing and promoting an
effective and professional Management Team, including the City
Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, the Council by resolution has established an Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan for certain positions including the City
Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, the Council has evaluated the relevant compensation factors
for the City Administrative Officer; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to adjust the compensation of the City
Administrative Officer commensurate with the level of performance and
consistent with the goals and purposes of the Appointed Officials
Compensation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to address other matters relating to the
terms and conditions of employment for the City Administrative Officer;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows.:
R 6170
Resolution No. 6170 (1987 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 1. The appointment of Paul Lanspery as City Administrative
Officer as of December 1, 1981, is hereby confirmed and continued in full
force and effect.
SECTION 2. In consideration of Mr. Lanspery's acceptance of the above
confirmation of employment, this Council adopts the following employment
terms and conditions:
A. Effective Date.
July 1, 1986, shall be the effective date of this Agreement.
B. Termination and Severance Pay.
In!the event Mr. Lanspery's employment is terminated by the Council
during such time that he is willing and able to perform the duties of City
Administrative Officer the City agrees to pay him a lump sum cash payment
equal to three (3) months compensation (salary and all appointed officials
fringe benefits). Should Mr. Lanspery obtain employment during the
three -month period following termination, he shall reimburse City
proportionately. In the event that he is terminated for good cause then
the City shall have no obligation to pay the lump sum severance payment
mentioned above. In the event Mr. Lanspery voluntarily resigns his
position with the City, he shall give the Council at least one (1) month
advance written notice.
C. Compensation
Mr. Lanspery's salary shall be established by Council resolution.
This salary may be adjusted by appropriate action of the Council at any
time in accordance with Section 6 of the Appointed Officials Compensation
Plan.
Resolution No. 6170 (1987 Series)
Page 3
All other compensation and benefits afforded under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan shall be in full force and effect.
D. Outside Employment, Conduct and Behavior.
(i) Mr. Lanspery may engage in outside activities such as
part -time teaching, consulting, or in other similar activities unrelated
to City business only with the express prior approval of the Council.
(ii) Mr. Lanspery shall comply with all local and state
requirements regarding conflicts -of- interest and shall avoid personal
involvement in situations which are inconsistent or incompatible with the
position of City Administrative Officer or give rise to the appearance of
impropriety.
E. Professional Development.
City shall provide funds for certain items, activities and
materials deemed necessary and desirable for Mr. Lanspery's continued
professional development, participation, growth and advancement, and,
therefore, for the good of the City. Those items, activities and
materials shall include:
(i) Professional dues and subscriptions necessary for full
participation in appropriate and relevant associations and organizations.
(ii) Travel and subsistence expenses for professional meetings and
similar functions (e.g., short courses, institutes, seminars) to foster
professional development.
(iii) Others, as shall be agreed upon from time to time between
Mr. Lanspery and City.
• 0
Resolution No. 6170 (1987 Series)
Page 4
F. Car Allowance.
Mr. Lanspery shall receive a car allowance of $200.00 per month.
G. Other Terms and Conditions of Employment.
The Council shall set any such other terms and conditions of
employment as it may determine from time to time, relating to the
performance of Mr. Lanpsery, provided such terms and conditions are not
inconsistent with or in conflict with the "provisions of this resolution,
the City Charter or any other law.
H. General Provisions.
It is the intent of the Council that this agreement and the
appointment of Mr. Lanspery as City Administrative Officer be in
accordance with the requirements and provisions of the Charter. Wherever
possible the provisions of this resolution shall be construed in a manner
consistent with the Charter. If any provision of this resolution
conflicts with the Charter, the Charter shall control. An invalid
provision of this resolution is severable and shall not affect any other
provision.
SECTION 3. Resolutions 4689 (1981 Series), 4957 (1982 Series), and
5798 (1985 Series), are hereby rescinded for administrative purposes.
On motion of Councilwoman Rap econded by Councilman Settle and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Ron Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17thday of February
1987.
Resolution No.6170 (1987 Series)
Page 5
AT'TES
CI CLERK PAMELA GES
APPROVED:
City Administrativ fficer
City Att §rney
Finance DirWtor
Personnel Director
MAYOR PRO -TEM
FFIN
* * * * s s
��
� ��e��'�
//,.�i2,�- r,�.�r.� --�
,�
��
`..'
•�
.. . _:
,.
RESOLUTION NO. 6169 (1987 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN APPOINTED OFFICIALS COMPENSATION
PLAN FOR CERTAIN MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND SUPERSEDING
PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of establishing a comprehensive
Appointed Officials Development and Compensation policy; and
WHEREAS, the Council is committed to a compensation policy that
strengthens the recruitment and retention of well - qualified and effective
appointed officials; and
WHEREAS, the Council is desirous of maintaining an appointed
officials compensation plan which is consistent with other City
compensation plans; and
WHEREAS, the Council is committed to a compensation plan which
reflects the differences between duties, responsibilities and job
requirements; and
WHEREAS, Council determines that merit and performance shall be the
basis for Appointed Officials compensation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
Section 1. An Appointed Officials salary plan is an important
component of a comprehensive compensation policy. In order to remain
competitive with the professional marketplace and promote merit and
performance as the criteria for individual salary determinations, the
following open - range. Appointed Officials Salary Schedule (Table "A ") for
fiscal years 1986 -88 is authorized. Subsequent changes in any group
salary range shall be authorized by Council resolution.
R 6169
Resolution No. 6169 (1987 Series)
Page 2
TABLE "A"
APPOINTED OFFICIALS SALARY SCHEDULE - FISCAL YEAR 1986 -1988
Group
Appointed Official Positions
Salary
Range
I
City Administrative Officer
$4,900
- 6,200
II
City Attorney
$4,400
- 5,600
III
City Clerk
$2,900
- 4,000
Section 2. For individuals in Appointed Officials Groups I through
III, the City Council shall determine compensation, including salary
within the designated ranges, after evaluating performance, the management
profession, and funding constraints.
Section 3. The City Council shall adopt individual employment
agreements for appointed officials in Groups I through III.
Section 4. The City Council is authorized to grant one -time
Performance Awards to employees in groups I through III for either
exceptional specific performance or sustained outstanding performance.
Section 5. The appointed official benefits attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" shall continue during fiscal years 1986 -88. The City shall
contribute a maximum of $268.30 per month for the medical, dental, and
vision coverage. The Management Life Insurance and Long -Term Disability
insurance shall continue to be directly funded by the City.
Section 6. The City Council shall be authorized to approve annual
salary adjustments to employees in groups I through III for fiscal year
86/87 commencing July 1, 1986 and January 1, 1987 and for fiscal year
87/88 commencing July 1, 1987 and January 1, 1988 consistent with
r ,
Resolution No. 6169
Page 3
(1987 Series)
performance, market considerations and adjustments granted other employee
groups, within total funding parameters authorized by the City Council.
Council review for fiscal year 87/88 adjustments shall be completed by
September 1, 1987.
Section 7. City Council authorizes the City Administrative Officer
to approve one -time compensation awards to all Management Team members,
including appointed officials, effective July 1, 1987, if all Management
Team goals are completed or are on schedule. Such awards shall be
contributions to either of the deferred compensation plans. Total funding
available for such awards shall not exceed 1% of the total compensation of
the Management Team. The CAO will inform the Council when such awards are
granted.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers.Rappa,.Settle and Dovey
NOES: Mayor Pro -Tern Griffin
ABSENT: Mayor Ron Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of February,
1987.
ATTES
CITY I CLERK PAMELA VOG
Resolution No. 6169
Page 4
APPROVED:
City Adm' istrati Officer
Av�
City Att ey
Finance Dire vt or
Personnel Director
x * s * s * * * s
(1987 Series)
v 1
EXHIBIT "A"
APPOINTED OFFICIAL FRINGE BENEFITS
1986 -88
SECTION A Medical, Dental, Eye Care
The City shall establish and maintain medical, dental and eye care
insurance plans for coverage by appointed officials and their dependents.
Each appointed official shall carry medical, eye care, and dental for
self. Dependent coverage shall be at the employee's option; however,
all eligible dependents must be covered, and covered on all plans, if
dependent coverage is desired. The City reserves the right to choose
the method of insuring and plans to be offered.
SECTION.B Unexpended Fringe.Benefit
The city shall pay to each appointed official an annual lump sum
payment (subject to appropriate taxation) for the difference between the
benefit amounts provided appointed officials and any lesser sum expended
by the employee for medical, eye care, and dental coverage for the,
calendar year. Payment shall be made at same time as all City employees.
SECTION C Life and Disability
The city shall provide the following special insurance benefits:.
1. Long -term disability insurance providing 60% of gross
salary to age 65 for any sickness-or accident after a
90 -day waiting period..
2. $50,000 term life insurance including accidental death
and dismemberment.
3. One -half of employee's health insurance premium paid
for retired appointed official who elects to remain as a
member of the city's group health plan. (Medical Plan)
SECTION D Retirement
The City agrees to provide.the Public Employees' Retirement System's
2% at age 60 plan to all eligible appointed officials, including the
amendment permitting conversion of unused sick leave to additional
retirement credit, the 1959 survivor's benefit and one year final
compensation.
Effective 7 -1 -81 the city agrees to pay the appointed officials'
contributions to P.E.R.S. These amounts paid by the city are employee
contributions and are paid by the city to satisfy the employee's
obligation to contribute the current percentage of salary to P.E.R.S. An
appointed official has no option to receive the contributed amounts
directly (as opposed to having them paid by the city to P.E.R.S. on behalf
of the employee). It is further understood and agreed that the payment of
the employee's P.E.R.S. contribution is made subject to I.R.S. approval
and reporting procedures.
SECTION E Vacation
Vacation leave for appointed officials shall be 15 days per year and
may be taken after the completion of the sixth calendar month of service
with the city. Vacation leave shall be accrued at the rate of eighteen
days per year upon completion of five years of continuous service and
twenty vacation days upon completion of ten years. Appointed officials
shall use every effort in scheduling vacation leave so as to minimize
adverse impacts on city administrative functions.
Vacation leave shall be accrued as earned
maximum of twice the annual accrual rate. Howl
determines that an appointed official has been
due to the press of city business, the Council
limits, or once annually may authorize payment
accumulation up to a maximum of five (5) days.
SECTION F Administrative Leave
each payroll period up to a
aver, if the City Council
unable to take vacation,
may increase the accrual
for one -half of the excess
Appointed officials shall accrue eight (8) days (64 hours) of
executive leave per calendar year. This leave shall accrue at the rate of
5.333 hours per month. Commencing January 1, 1987 appointed officials
shall have the option of taking such leave as additional paid leave or
receiving cash for up to 64 hours at year end, upon the approval of the
City Council.
SECTION G Holidays
Appointed officials shall receive 10 fixed + 2 floating holidays per
year.
SECTION H Sick Leave
Sick leave is governed by Section 2.36.420 of the Municipal Code. An
appointed official may take up to two (2) days per year of sick leave if
required to be away from the job to personally care for a member of
his /her immediate family as defined in Section 2.36.420. This may be
extended to five (5) days per year if the'fam_ily member is part of the
employee's household, and to seven (7.) days if a household family member
is hospitalized and the employee submits written verification of such
hospitalization.
Upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage
of the dollar value of the employee's accumulated sick leave will be paid
to the employee, or the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries according
to the following schedule:
(A) Death - 25%
(B) Retirement and actual commencement of PERS benefits:
(1) After ten (10) years of continuous employment - 10%
(2) After twenty (20) years of continuous employment - 15%
C
SECTION I Workers' Compensation Leave
An appointed official who is absent from duty because of on- the -job
injury in accordance with the state workers' compensation law and is not
eligible for disability payments under labor Code Section 4850 shall be
paid the difference between the employee's base salary and the amount
provided by workers' compensation law during the first ninety (90)
business days of such temporary disability absence. Eligibility for
workers' compensation leave requires an open workers' compensation claim.
C
RESOLUTION N0. 6168 (1987 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO ENDORSING IN CONCEPT A CAL POLY STUDENT - COMMUNITY
LIAISON COMMITTEE.
WHEREAS, the City believes that residents should be informed of the
business of their municipal government by providing to all interested
people, notice of the nature and type of actions being considered by the
City Council, its advisory bodies and city staff; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to provide the residents with accurate
and timely information on issues which affect them; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a cooperative and
participative relationship with the Cal Poly Associated Students, Inc.
regarding common interests and issues; and
WHEREAS, the Associated Students, Inc. of Cal Poly has proposed the
concept of a Student- Community Liaison Group; and
WHEREAS, the City Council welcomes the assistance of such a group
in addressing student - related city concerns such as group housing,
noise, public nuisances, traffic and parking near campus.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council supports in concept a Cal Poly
Student - Community Liaison Committee for the purpose of consolidating
student representation on community matters.
SECTION 2. A City Councilmember(s), or City staff representative
will meet as necessary with the Committee to inform, explain, or clarify
information or issues that may affect the students.
R 6168
Resolution No. 6168 (1987 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 3. The City Council would encourage that one member of the
Committee be the direct contact with the City Administrative Officer and
that this representative attend City Council and Planning Commission
meetings on a regular basis and other advisory body meetings as
appropriate.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa; seconded by Councilwoman Dovey, and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Dovey, Settle and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of February,
1987.
ATTEST: 1
` V
City erk Pamela Vogt
APPROVED:
City Administrati a Officer
r W-�wr %� • .- v 7
Mayor Pro -Tem Robert ffin
�v /'L `.
RESOLUTION NO. 6167 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 1264 (UNIT 1)
(SUMMER HILLS ASSOCIATES, SUBDIVIDER)
WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning Tract 1264,
Unit I, as contained in Resolution No. 5967 (1986 Series), and
WHEREAS, all conditions required per Resolution No. 5967 (1986 Series) have
been met or bonded for,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that final approval is hereby granted for
Tract 1264; Unit I.
On motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and armed this 17th day of February ,
1987.
ATTEST:
CIT CLERK PAMELA VOONS
VO
MAYOR PRO -TEM
R6167
Resolution No. 6167 (1987 Series)
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City A Ac-
-j- rney
Z�zj"
Community Development Director
I� Nn, � 21i-n�
City E sneer
jk3 /t1264fin
by
STANDARD SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT. is dated this 17th day of February by and
between SUMMERHILL ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ,
herein referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO,
herein referred to as the "City."
RECITALS
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real
property in the City of San .Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State
of California, a description of which is shown on final map of Tract:1264;
City of San: Luis. Obispo; California,,as; approved by the City Council, on
the ::17th day of February -- 1987-
The Subdivider desires that said Tract 1264 be accepted and approved
as a final map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San
Luis Obispo (Title 17 of the San Luis Obispo Municipai.Code), and
It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to
install the improvements as set forth on the plans therefore.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
In consideration of.the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree
to construct and install the following subdivision improvements in
accordance with-said subdivision regulations, and in accordance with
approved plans and specifications on file in the office of the City
Engineer, City of San L6's Obispo, to wit:
1
1. CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS
y
2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING
3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the
property line and water services to the curb stop.
4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
5. ORNAMENTAL METAL ELECTROLIERS
6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the
inspection and approval of such facilities by the City, each
public utility shall be required to file a letter stating that the
developer has properly installed all facilities to be provided by
him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to
residents upon request.
7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City
regulations.
All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated
and to the plans and specifications on file and approved by said City
Engineer.
The lines and grades for all of said improvements shall be established
by the Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and
specifications.
I
The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above
improvements shall begin within thirty (30) days from the date of
recording of the final map, and that the work shall be completed within
eighteen (18) months of said recording date, unless an extension has been
granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work is delayed
by acts of God or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the
Subdivider shall have an additional period of time equivalent to such
period-of delay in which to complete such work. Any extension of time
hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the Improvement
2
c�
(D
Security filed pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety
waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of
California.
No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the
expiration date of the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public
improvements unless specifically approved by the City.
The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the following conditions
established by the Planning Commission and /or the City Council:
1. The Subdivider has deposited a monumentation guarantee of $150.00 to cover
the installation of survey monuments in accordance with the approved map
and payment for same. Said deposit will be released to the Subdivider upon
receipt by.the City of a letter from the Engineer indicating they have
completed the work and have been paid.
2. The Subdivider shall complete oii -site improvements per Items 3 thru 8 of
Resolution No. 5967 (1986 Series).
3. Park =in =lieu fees are not required for Tract 1264 since.it is a part of
Tract 123 k.
5, which dedicated a parfor Condition 7 of Resolution No. 5968
(1986 Series).
4. The Subdivider has posted a cash deposit in the amount of $25,130.00 for a
pro -rata share of a future 12" Bullock Lane waterline to be installed per
Condition 30 of Resolution 5968 (1986 Series). This deposit will be
released upon installation of said Waterline.
5: Subdivider shall provide for payment of $750.00 to the City through escrow
for each dwelling unit as a park development fee. These payments are
payable prior to occupancy releases or property transfers in lieu of .filing
liens as prescribed in Condition 14 of Resolution No. 5968 (1986 Series).
Terms and conditions of escrow to be in a form and content satisfactory to
the City Attorney.
6. Fees for water acreage, sewer lift station, and a deposit for transit
system street furniture were paid with Tract 1235 of which this is a part.
Therefore additional fees for these items are not required.
The restoration of lost section corners and retracement of section
lines within the Subdivision. shall be in accordance with Division 4,
Chapter 15 of the Land Surveyors dc* of the Professions and Vocations Code
of the.State of California, paragraph 8771 et seq.
R
The Subdivider attaches hereto, as an integral part hereof, and as
security for the performance of this agreement, an 'instrument of credit or
bond approved by and in favor of the City of San Luis Obispo, and
conditional upon the faithful performance of this agreement. Said
instrument of credit or bond is in the amount of $30,000.00, which is the.
amount of the estimated cost of said improvements. Subdivider agrees to
remedy any defects in the improvements arising from faulty workmanship or
materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring within
twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with Sections
66499.7 and 66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California,
upon final completion and acceptance of the work, City will release all
but 10% of the total public improvements, that amount being deemed
sufficient to guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his
obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a
period of one year 'following the completion and .acceptance thereof.
Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date
which the City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted.
accept said improvements according to said plans and specifications, and
any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic nor progress
inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said improvements
or waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement.
If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed
time, the Subdivider ;agrees that City may, at its option, declare the
instrument of credit or bond which has been posted by Subdivider to
guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the. proceeds to
4
N
complete said improvements, or city may complete said improvements and
recover the full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his
surety.
The Subdivider agrees to deposit with the City a labor and material
bond in the amount of 50% of the above described subdivision improvements
in accordance with State law (50% of $30,000 = -$15,000).
Said Subdivider has deposited with the City the sum of $33,000.00 in
connection with Tract 1235 from which deposit the City will pay the salary
and expenses of an inspector or inspectors to inspect installation of said
subdivision improvements in Tract 1264 together with Tract 1235, and
certify that they have been completed in accordance with the plans and
specifications. Any unexpended monies will be'returned to the
Subdivider. In the event the inspection fees exceed the sum of
$33,000.00, the difference is to be paid by the Subdivider. The City
reserve's the sole discretion in-determining the amounts to be paid for
salary and expenses of said inspector or inspectors.
Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled
"Subdivision," all plane and specifications on file with said City
Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all other documents filed
with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer are
hereby referred to for further particulars in 'interpreting and defining
the obligations of the Subdivider under this agreement.
It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City
hereto that this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors,
administrators, successors and assigns of the respective Parties to this
agreement.
5
It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful
bidder's contract unit prices and total bid prices for all of the
improvements herein referred to.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by:
ATTE
CI CLERK PAMELA VO S
{) 1 1 'A� proved as to form:
12-v� -
City Att ney
City E ineer
Agr -1264
by
SUBDIVIDER
SUMMERHILL ASSOCIATES,
A California Limited Partnership
by Santa Lucia Hills,
A California General Partmership
6
General Partner
�� `�
�,�/ /�t /jaq�,,,
RESOLUTION NO. 6166 (1987 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING SPECIFIC HERITAGE TREES
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Heritage Tree Program for the
City of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted the following as
Heritage Trees; and
1. Torrey Pine (Pints Torreyana), 1185 Foothill.Blvd.
2. Coast.Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), 1303 Higuera Street
3. Cajeput Tree (Melaleuca leucadendron),. 955 Pepper Street
4. Floss Silk Tree (Chorisia speciosa), 941 Chorro Street
5. Two (2) Victorian Box (Pittosporum undulatum), 696 Monterey Street
7. Saucer Magnolia (Magnolia soulangeana), 536 Marsh Street
8. Japanese Maple (Ater palmatum), 536 Marsh Street
WHEREAS, the Tree Committee and staff has identified, reviewed and
approved the following trees as Heritage Trees
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby.approve the following as
Heritage Trees:
1. Coast Redwood (Sequoia Sempervirens), 1185 Pacific Street
2. Western Redbud (Cercis Occidentalis), 1060 Pismo Street
3. Smooth Shell Macadamia (Macadamia Integrifolia), 378 Grand Avenue
4. Cork Oak (Quercus Suber), 396 Lincoln Street
5. California Sycamore (Platanus Racemosa), 9 South Higuera Street
R 6166
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Coiuncilwomaii
Rappa and on the following roll call vote
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro =Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of February,
1987.
ATTES .
rr^ � S
CITY CLERK PAKELA VOG
APPROVED:
City CAdminisirative Officer
City Atto y
Director of Public Works
b /brazeal /resolution
. .........
lb r [)(I:
. .........
RESOLUTION NO. 6165 (1987 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, COUNTY AND BRUCE FRASER
FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR A NEW CITY - COUNTY LIBRARY
AT 955 PALM STREET
WHEREAS, in May of 1985, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San luis
Obispo and the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo agreed to pursue
development of a new City - County Library facility; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement the architectural- planning firm of
Merriam- Fraser was selected on November 25, 1985 to perform architectural
serices for the project; and
WHEREAS, by mutual consent the parties to the contract for architectural
services agreed to terminate the relationship as of December 31, 1986; and
WHEREAS, Bruce Fraser, a local architect who has provided architectural
services as a partner in the firm of Merriam- Fraser, has been selected to enter
into an agreement to perform the remainder of design services for the library
project;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
that the certain Agreement with the City of San Luis Obispo, the County of San
.Luis Obispo and Bruce Fraser hereto marked Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein
by reference is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the
same.
The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this Resolution and a copy of the
executed Agreement to the Finance Director, the Public Works Director and
Merriam- Fraser.
R 6165
Resolution No. 6165 (1987 Series)
Page Two.
On motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilwoman Rappa and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro-Tem. Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day
of February 1987.
ATTEST:
V
CITY CL RK PAMELA VOGES
APPROVED:
City nsitra it ve fficer
1�
ity AttcAney
e D
City gineer
CH1 /BFcontract
AGREEMENT - ARCHITECT SERVICES
This Agreement, made this 17th day of February, 1987, by and between the
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY ", the CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", who are sometimes hereinafter
referred to Jointly as OWNER, and BRUCE D. FRASER hereinafter referred to as
"CONSULTANT ".
WITNESSETH:
That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT:
a. SCOPE:: CONSULTANT will provide the following architectural services as
described herein and under Exhibits "A" and "C" for the CITY and COUNTY project
hereinafter described: CITY - COUNTY LIBRARY FACILITY, Project #P2268. Exhibits "A ",
"B ", tich. and "D" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as
though here fully set forth.
b. COORDINATION: In the performance of CONSULTANT'S service under this
Agreement, CONSULTANT agrees that he will maintain such coordination with CITY and
COUNTY via the CITY /COUNTY BUILDING COMMITTEE or the COUNTY Project Coordinator as
appropriate. All status reports, progress reports or correspondence for the
BUILDING COMMITTEE should be directed to the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR. The
COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR shall be responsible for obtaining signatures of both
CITY and COUNTY officials for documents or authorizations requiring same.
C. CONSULTANT's SERVICES: Insofar as they may be applicable to the project
contemplated by this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall render the services and furnish
the tasks of work as described in Exhibits "A ", "B" and "C", commencing with
receipt of a written Notice to Proceed signed by the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR and
by the COUNTY DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES.
ARTICLE.2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE COUNTY AND CITY:
The. COUNTY and CITY shall cooperate with CONSULTANT on all phases of the work
covered by this Agreement and will make available to him, as his needs indicate,
the existing unmodified Contract Documents, Specifications, Engineering and soils
reports, facility program and other similar data in possession of the COUNTY or
REV 1
CITY pertaining to the subject project and designated site. The OWNER shall be
responsible for providing •soils analysis, material testing, project management and
project inspection as is necessary for project completion.
ARTICLE 3. FEE AND PROVISION FOR PAYMENT:
COUNTY will pay CONSULTANT a fee equal to $66,819.00 for work contracted in
this Agreement and billed for based on payment schedules per Exhibits "B" and "D ".
Exhibits "B" and "D" are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as
though here fully set forth. Any additional applicable hourly rate billings as
authorized in Article 4 shall be based on the Fee Schedule contained in Exhibit "B ".
ARTICLE 4. PAYMENT FOR EXTRA WORK OR CHANGES:
Any claim for payment for extra work or changes in the work will be paid by
OWNER only upon certification by the DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES that the claimed
extra work or change was authorized in advance by the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR,
the COUNTY DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES, the CITY PROJECT COORDINATOR and the CITY
FINANCE DIRECTOR and that the work has been satisfactorily completed. Claims for
such extra work must be submitted by CONSULTANT within 30 days of completion of
such work and must be accompanied by a statement of itemized costs covering said
work.
ARTICLE 5. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT:
All parties hereto shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon
giving a 10 -day written notice of such termination to the other parties. In the
event of the termination of this project in its entirety, notwithstanding any other
fee provision of this Agreement, the OWNER, based upon work accomplished by the
CONSULTANT prior to notice of such termination, shall determine the amount of fee .
to be paid to CONSULTANT for his service based upon provisions in Exhibit "B" and
such findings of the OWNER shall be final and conclusive as to the amount of such
fee. In the event of termination of any portion of this project, CONSULTANT shall
be entitled to the reasonable value of his services involved in the termination, as
determined by OWNER, upon a finding which shall be final and conclusive as to the
amount of fee due and owing.
ARTICLE 6. TIME OF COMPLETION:
CONSULTANT agrees to diligently pursue his work under this Agreement and to
complete the work as described in Exhibit "A" as Item 1, in a satisfactory manner
REV 2
within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice to Proceed. This time frame is
exclusive of CITY, COUNTY- and STATE agency approvals. CONSULTANT shall not be
responsible for any delay which is caused by action or inaction of COUNTY or CITY
or acts of God, but shall be responsible for his own fault or negligence of that of
any consultants, employees or independent contractors of his. CONSULTANT shall
deliver to the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR completed work as required under Exhibit
"A" of this agreement. CONSULTANT will be provided written verification of date. or
receipt of such work by the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR.
If the work is not completed by CONSULTANT i.n the time specified or within
any period of extension authorized in writing by the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR and
the CITY PROJECT COORDINATOR, it is understood that the OWNER will suffer damages
and CONSULTANT will pay to the COUNTY and CITY as fixed and liquidated damages,
(not as a penalty), the sum of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) for each
calendar day of the delay until the work is completed and accepted. CONSULTANT is
liable for the amount thereof, and the OWNER may deduct said sums from any money
due or that may become due to CONSULTANT.
ARTICLE 7. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
No member, office, or employee of the COUNTY or CITY during his tenure, or
for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this
Agreement or the.proceeds thereof.
ARTICLE 8. OWNERSHIP OF DATA:
The ownership of all data collected for use by CONSULTANT under this
Agreement, together with working papers, drawings, and other material necessary to
a complete understanding of the plans and necessary for the practical use of plans
shall be vested in OWNER. Ownership of original drawings and documents shall be
vested in the OWNER. CONSULTANT may retain a copy of all work for his own use.
CONSULTANT shall provide to OWNER three (3) copies of Contract Drawings and three
(3) copies of Contract Specifications at completion of Task 20 of attachment "B ",
along with one (1) set of reproducible drawings and Specifications together with
copies of the structural, electrical and mechanical consultants calculations to
COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR as part of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide to
CITY the number-of Contract Drawings and Specifications necessary to obtain a
revised no fee Building Permit as part of this Agreement. At conclusion of Item 2
work, the original contract drawings and specification documents are to be
delivered to the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR.
ARTICLE 9. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES:
CONSULTANT warrants that he had not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for him, to solicit or
secure the Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT, and fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage flee, gift, or any other consideration contingent
on or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement, for breach or violation
of this warranty, the OWNER shall have the right to annul this Agreement without
liability, or in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration
or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage fee,
gift, or contingency.
ARTICLE 10. CONTRACT PERSONNEL:
The work to be done pursuant to this Agreement shall be done by Bruce D.
Fraser, licensed Architect No. C -9787, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT and
such other personnel or consultants in the employ or under the supervision of
CONSULTANT who shall be approved by the OWNER. The COUNTY official who shall be
vested with the right of approval of such additional' personnel or outside
Consultant parties shall be the DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES. The CITY official
who shall be vested with the right of approval of such additional personnel or
outside Consultant parties shall be the CITY PROJECT COORDINATOR. The COUNTY and
CITY reserve the right to reject any of the CONSULTANT'S personnel or proposed
outside consultants and the COUNTY and CITY reserve the right to request that
acceptable replacement personnel be assigned to the project.
ARTICLE 11. INDEMNITY CLAUSE:
CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless the CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO and COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, their officers, agents and employees from any
and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expense liability arising out of this
Agreement or occasioned by the negligent performance or attempted negligent
performance of the provision hereof, including, but not limited to, any negligent
act or omission to act on the part of CONSULTANT or his agents or employees or
independent contractors directly responsible to him, except that the. above shall
A
C �
not apply to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the COUNTY or CITY or
their agents, servants or-independent contractors who are directly responsible to
COUNTY or CITY.
This indemnification provision shall apply even if there is concurrent or
joint negligence of indemnitor and indemnitee, and even if there is active or
passive negligence by either or both parties.
ARTICLE 12. INSURANCE:
a. Errors and Omissions Insurance: CONSULTANT shall obtain, prior to
commencement of the work of thi.s Agreement, professional liability (Errors and
Omissions) insurance, in a company authorized to issue such insurance in the State
of California, with limits of liability of not less than One Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($100,000) to cover all architectural services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement.
Such insurance is to be kept in force until February 28, 1989.
b. Auto and Public Liability Insurance: CONSULTANT shall maintain in full
force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, automobile insurance and
public liability insurance with an insurance carrier satisfactory to OWNER, which
insurance shall include protection against claims arising from personal injury,
including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from any
actual occurrence arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The amounts of
insurance shall not be less than the following:
Single limit coverage applyi.ng to bodily and personal injury, including
death resulting therefrom, and property damage or a combination thereof in an
amount not less than $1,000,000.
The following endorsements must be attached to the policy or policies-:
(1) If the insurance policy covers on an "accident" basis, it must
be changed to "occurrence ".
(2) The policy must cover personal injury as well as bodily injury.
(3) Broad form property damage liability must be afforded.
(4) The COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO,
their officers, employees, and agents, shall be named insured under the policy and
REV 4
I �
the policy shall stipulate that' the insurance will operate as primary insurance and
that no other insurance effected by the COUNTY or CITY will be called upon to
contribute to a loss hereunder.
(5) Contractual liability either on a blanket basis or by
identifying this Agreement within a contractual liability endorsement.
(6) "Cross- liability" such that each insured is covered as if
separate policies had been issued to each insured.
(7) COUNTY and CITY shall be' given 30 days notice prior to
cancellation or reduction in coverage of the insurance.
C. Workers' Compensation Insurance: In accordance with the provisions
of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, CONSULTANT shall be insured against liability
for Workers' Compensation or undertake self- insurance. CONSULTANT agrees that if
CONSULTANT has any persons in his direct employ during the term of this Agreement,
he shall comply with such provisions before commencing performance of any work
under this Agreement.
d. Copies of Insurance to OWNER before Commencement of Work:
CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance to OWNER prior to commencement
of work of this Agreement. Certificates of insurance are necessary before a Notice
to Proceed is issued. Certificates shall state that the policy shall not be
cancelled or reduced in coverage without 30 days written notice to COUNTY and
CITY. Approval of insurance by OWNER shall not relieve or decrease the extent to
which CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payment of damages resulting from
service or operations performed pursuant to this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not
perform any work under this Agreement until he has obtained the required insurance
and until the required insurance certificates have been submitted to the COUNTY and
CITY and approved by the COUNTY COUNSEL and CITY ATTORNEY. If CONSULTANT fails or
refuses to procure or maintain the insurance required by these provisions, or fails
or refuses to furnish COUNTY and CITY required proof that insurance has been
procured and is in force and paid for, OWNER shall have the right at OWNER's
election to forthwith terminate this Agreement.
ARTICLE 13. BONDING:
This article is deleted.
REV 1
ARTICLE 14. STATUS:
CONSULTANT shall, during the entire term of the Agreement, be construed to be.
an independent contractor, and in no event shall any of its personnel or
sub - contractors be construed . to be an employee of COUNTY or CITY.
ARTICLE 15. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT:
This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment signed by all
parties hereto.
ARTICLE 16. LAW GOVERNING:
This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the State of California.
ARTICLE 17. COMMUNICATIONS:
Communications between the parties to this Agreement may be sent to the
following addresses:
COUNTY: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Department of General Services
County Government Center, Room 460
San Luis Obispo, California 93408
Attn: Kenneth L. Wattelet, Project Coordinator
CITY: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
City Administrative Officer
City Hall
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, California 9340
Attn: Candace Havens, Project Coordinator
CONSULTANT: BRUCE D. FRASER
979 Osos Street, Suite "C"
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Attn: Bruce D. Fraser
-7-
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO THIS 1 ;; %W day of �' 91987.
COUNTY OF SAt�VAUIZoa By: ,YJ t o upe sons
ATTE _:
Gam— l U
7 tA Cl erk, Pamel a Vo96
ATTEST:
County lerk an x- is erc o
the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
Coun ounsel
By:
epru -ty ounty Ljun el
Date. f 7 �0 �/tC17
REV 2
AAut rued by Board Action th'-.1 7th day
Febr 1987
CITY 7i1IS tO - By.
avor Pro- Temnore Robert riff in
Approved by City this 17tjf �da� �6f
February, 1987 v!�
CONSULTA T: BRU D. FRASER, AIA
By: ?Z2?�
License Architect No. C -9.787
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
By:
Roger Pi s et, City ttorney
Date. a -.'0 - ! +
_R_
COUNTY EXHIBIT "A" - RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT
Upon COUNTY'S and CITY'S approval of this Agreement and upon issuance of a
Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall proceed with the followi "ng tasks:
TASK 1 - CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS: Modifications to the County
provided Contract Documents necessary for bidding and construction purposes within
the budget limit set forth in Attachment "B ", Item 1 including altering the
architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, site development and
landscaping drawings specifications per Attachment "C ". CONSULTANT shall also
include in the modified Contract Documents a color schedule covering all finish
materials, furnishings and accessory items to be provided in the construction
contract. CONSULTANT shall also provide color schedules and separate specification
documents suitable for bidding for the furniture, accessories and graphic items not
in the construction contract. A final cost estimate for furniture and accessories
is to be provided with the modified Contract Documents.
Within five (5) days following completion of the Contract Documents,
CONSULTANT shall deliver to COUNTY the original drawings and contract
specifications which shall be reproduced by the COUNTY for bidding purposes. The
original Contract Documents will be returned to CONSULTANT prior to completion of
construction for CONSULTANT'S use in recording "As Built" construction changes per
Task 5.
TASK 2 - BUILDING PERMIT: CONSULTANT shall re- submit to the CITY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT a revised application for a no -fee Building Permit.
CONSULTANT shall conform the modified Contract Documents to requirements for
approval and issuance of the Building Permit by the CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
TASK 3 - BID. ADMINISTRATION: CONSULTANT shall assist the OWNER during bid
period insofar as clarification and interpretation of Contract Documents and
preparation of addenda and clarification documents as required.
TASK 4 - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION: The CONSULTANT will endeavor to secure
compliance by contractor with the contract and applicable requirements, but does
not guarantee the performance of the contractor. The CONSULTANT shall provide
general administration of the construction contract, including attendance at the
n
pre - construction conference and periodic inspections at the site as CONSULTANT
deems necessary' to render- architectural observation which is distinguished from
continuous personal inspection; make regular reports as may be required by
applicable public agencies; keep the OWNER informed through communication as
necessary with the COUNTY PROJECT COORDINATOR of the progress of construction,
review schedules and shop drawings for compliance with designs; assist in
preparation of change orders; approve substitutions of materials and equipment, and
review the laboratory reports thereof; examine and verify contractor's application
for payment; determine date of substantial completion and make final inspection of
the project (with actual presence of representatives of CONSULTANT as specified by
OWNER).
TASK 5 - RECORD DOCUMENTS AND POST CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION: Within
thirty (30) days following completion of the project and before final payment is
made to CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT shall deliver to COUNTY the original drawings and a
set of specifications in "As- Built" form showing ALL changes in construction,
materials, dimensions, locations, and installed equipment and other information
necessary to fully describe these changes. These drawings and specifications shall
be OWNER'S property. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to rely upon records maintained
by CONTRACTOR(S) unless CONSULTANT has knowledge that such is incorrect.
CONSULTANT shall also provide at the OWNER'S request, advice to the OWNER on
apparent deficiencies in construction following the acceptance of work and prior to
expiration of the one year guarantee period of the CONTRACTOR'S work.
COUNTY EXHIBIT "B" - PAYMENT SCHEDULE
PROVISIONS FOR PAYMENT: OWNER will pay CONSULTANT a fixed fee to equal to
$66,819.00 for work contracted for in this Agreement based on the following:
1. RETAINER: Upon consummation of this Agreement and proof of valid contracts
to perform required work of the agreement between CONSULTANT Bruce D. Fraser and
SUB- CONSULTANTS listed in Exhibit "D" and the issuance of a written Notice to
Proceed, COUNTY will pay CONSULTANT and listed SUB - CONSULTANTS a sum equal to 11%
of the foregoing fixed fee.
2. CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS:
a. 100% Complete and _Submitted for Revised Permit: OWNER will pay a sum
which, when added to the previous payments, equals 15% of the total fixed fee
aforesaid, when the working drawings and specifications have been fully modified
and application for a Building Permit has been made to the CITY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
3. CONTRACT AWARD /DATE: When bids on the proposed construction contract have
been presented to the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and the CITY COUNCIL and the contract
has been awarded to a bidder, or if the Board or Council shall reject bids, even
though there is a reasonable bid within the construction budget for the project,
OWNER will pay CONSULTANT and listed SUB- CONSULTANTS on approval and certification
by the PROJECT COORDINATORS and the DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES a sum which, when
added to the previous payments, equals 60% of the said total fixed fee..
If the lowest responsible bid for the construction phase of the project
received by COUNTY exceeds the construction budget for the project (exclusive of
furnishings), which is $2,715,000.00, CONSULTANT shall, upon request from OWNER
through a Notice to Redesign, modify the contract documents and perform any item of
service necessary without cost to OWNER, exclusive of a substantial change in the
approved building program provided to the CONSULTANT so as to bring the cost of the
project within the construction budget when rebid, all without cost to OWNER unless
OWNER approves an increase in the Project Budget prior to bidding or agrees to
accept cost increases.
REV 5
11
CONSULTANT is allowed thirty (30) calendar days from Notice to redesign to
completion and acceptance or revised documents. This time is in addition to that
specified in Article 6. The furniture budget for the Library and Community Room is
$260,230.00, which is not subject to the preceding redesign clause.
4. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION:
a. 50% Complete: When the progress payments to the contractor or
contractors on the construction job equal 80% of the total contract price involved
in all construction contracts, OWNER will pay to CONSULTANT on approval and
certification by the PROJECT COORDINATORS and the DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES, a
sum which, when added to previous payments, equals 75% of the total fixed fee
aforesaid. In the event a bid is not let by the OWNER for any of the work of this
project, then OWNER shall not be obligated to make the payment in this item nor any
payment under the succeeding items of this article.
b. Complete: When the Notice of Completion has been filed by the OWNER on
the construction project in total, the OWNER will pay to CONSULTANT a sum which,
when added to all previous item payments, equals 95% of the total .fixed fee
aforesaid.
5. AS -BUILT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS; Upon delivery of "As- built" drawings
and specifications by CONSULTANT to COUNTY, as required in Exhibit "A ", OWNER will
pay to CONSULTANT, upon approval and certification by the PROJECT COORDINATORS and
the DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES, a sum which, when added to all previous payments
itemized above, equals 100% of the total fixed fee aforesaid.
6. CONSULTANT'S RATE SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL WORK: Any additional work as
authorized in writing by the Owner for this Agreement shall be based on the
following rate schedule:
a. Time and Principal and Employees at the fixed hourly rates of:
Principal $70.00
Project Manager $35.00
Drafts Person $22.50 to $27.50 depending on classification
Secretarial, Clerical $20.00
b. Engineers and other professional consultants at the same amounts billed
to Bruce D. Fraser for such services.
C. Reimbursable expenses amounts expended for the following items will be
billed at cost:
REV 3
10
I . Expense of overtime work requiring higher than regular rates if
authorized by Owner in advance.
2.. Reproduction of prints or copies of Specifications beyond those
indicated in Article 8.
7. REIMBURSEMENT _BETWEEN CITY AND .COUNTY: It is expressly understood by all
parties hereto that COUNTY shall pay all properly authorized funds to CONSULTANT
with CITY reimbursing COUNTY in the amount of 50% of all said payments.
REV 1
_11_
COUNTY EXHIBIT "C" ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
1. Upon COUNTY'S and CITY'S issuance of a Notice to Proceed, the COUNTY shall
provide the CONSULTANT the following contract document originals:
A. 112 in- progress drawings consisting of: Sheets G -1, D -1, C -1, AS -1 thru
AS -5, A -101 thru A -114, A -201 thru A205, A -.301 thru A -305, A -401 thru
A -4049 A -501 thru A -504, A -601 thru A -609, F -101 thru F -103, S -1 thru
S -129 MP -11 M -1 thru M -15, P -1 thru P -7. E -1 thru E -21 and L -1 thru L -4.
B.
In- progress original
Specification Sheets, Section 01010, Page 1
thru
Section 16930, Page 2
inclusive..
C.
Copy of Structural
Analysis and Calculations by Howard D. Stup
and
Associates.
D.
Copy of Mechanical
System notes, load calculations and Title
24
Compliance Data by Al
Nibecker and Associates.
E.
Copy of Electrical Load Calculation and Engineering Notes by Toler
and
Associates.
F. Copy of the CITY and COUNTY approved Building Program and Revisions for
the San Luis Obispo City /County Library Project dated June, 1984 and
rebruary, 1985.
2. The CONSULTANT shall alter, modify or develop new documents as required to
effect the following changes to meet project budget objectives:
A. Eliminate the third floor portion of the atrium. All related.
appurtenants not required by the less stringent code for two -story
openings, including the skylite, smoke evacuation system and emergency
generator are to be deleted.
B. The area currently constituting the atrium on the third floor is to be
redesigned as usable- floor space devoted to enlarging the Technical
Services area to meet program requirements.
C. Less costly materials specified in Deductive Alternates 2 for the lobby
flooring and Alternate 4 for the roofing are to be incorporated into the
Contract Documents.
D. Deductive. Alternate 7, the low voltage step accent lighting, is to
remain as an Alternate.
E. The free standing display cases on the first floor (Items 33, Drawing
A -101) are to be made a deductive alternate.in the Contract Documents.
REV 1
-14-
F. Revise the specification for library carpeting #1, #3 and #4 to a less
costly carpet, a's specified by COUNTY.
G. Replace the veneer brick "pavers" on the exterior wall surfaces with
veneer brick tiles.
H. The remaining Deductive Alternates in the original documents are to be
eliminated and their respective work is to be incorporated into the
modified Contract Documents.
L. Delete all vinyl wall coverings on first floor of library, replace with
paint finishes.
J. Eliminate glazing and full height. walls surrounding atrium at second
floor. Replace with low wall and railing designed to discourage
children from climbing or sitting on.
K. Substitute cast stone occulus for carved granite as originally specified.
L. Projector screens in the Children's Library and audio - Visual Viewing
Room are to be N.I.C.
M. Reduce range of thermal protection required of insulation specified for
under - ground hydronic piping, if this results in cost savings.
N. Revise Specification Section 15050 to allow use of Tyler pipe as an
acceptable alternate to hubless sanitary soil and waste piping.
0. Modify the language of Specification Sections 15 and 16 as necessary to
allow greater latitude in "or equal" submittals.
P. Unit pricing for the concrete foundation piles will remain in the
Contract Documents.
3. The resulting bid documents shall contain two deductive bid alternates: 1.
display cases; 2. Step accent lighting; and unit pricing for the foundation
piles.
REV 3
-1 r%-
COUNTY EXHIBIT "D" - PAYABLE SCHEDULE
1. The following amounts are to be paid by COUNTY both solely and thru joint
drafts payable to listed SUB - CONSULTANTS and CONSULTANT, as indicated:
PAYMENT 1: RETAINER
REV 3
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Dealey, Renton & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Howard F. Stup & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
A. F. Nibecker & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
The Environmental Collaborative
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Interior Planning Resource
TOTAL
$ 832.00
4,124.00
1,044.00
604.00
372.00
139.00
235.00
$ 73350.00 = 11%
PAYMENT 2: 100% COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser:
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Howard F. Stup & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
A. F. Nibecker & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
The Environmental Collaborative
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
Interior Planning Resource
-16-
$ 2,673.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
00
TOTAL $2,673.00 = 4%
REV 3
G � O
PAYMENT 3: SUCCESSFUL BID AND CONTRACT AWARD
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser: $ 29323.00
Joint Payment to
Bruce D. Fraser
and
122486.00
Howard F. Stup &
Associates
Joint Payment to
Bruce D. Fraser
and
89766.00
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to
Bruce D. Fraser
and
4,168.00
A. F. Nibecker &
Associates
Joint Payment to
Bruce D. Fraser
and
861.00
The Environmental
Collaborative
Joint Payment to
Bruce D. Fraser
and
1,465.00
Interior Planning
Resource
TOTAL $30,069.00 = 45%
PAYMENT 4: 50% COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser: $ 59552.00
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and 2,062.00
Dealey, Renton & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and 3,750.00
Howard F. St-up & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and 15000.00
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and 19000.00
A. F. Nibecker & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and 0.00
The Environmental Collaborative
Joint Payment to Bruce'D. Fraser and 0.00
Interior Planning Resource
TOTAL $13,364_00 = 20%
-17-
PAYMENT 5: 100% COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser: $ 69898.00
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
1,000.00
Howard F. Stup & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
250.00
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
1,000.00
A. F. Nibecker & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
375.00
The Environmental Collaborative
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
50.0.,00
Interior Planning Resource,
TOTAL
$10,023.00 =
15%
.PAYMENT 6: COMPLETION OF AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Payment to Bruce D. Fraser:
$ 2,090.00
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
500.00
Howard F. Stup & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
250.00
Toler & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
500.00
A. F. Nibecker & Associates
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
0.00
The Environmental Collaborative.
Joint Payment to Bruce D. Fraser and
0.00
Interior-Planning Resource
TOTAL
$ 3,340.00 =
5%
2. In the event that any named SUB - CONSULTANTS are unable to perform
the services
for the CONSULTANT as required by this Agreement, the CITY
and COUNTY
shall
have the right to substitute such CONSULTANTS per Article 10
of the Agreement..
3. If SUB - CONSULTANT substitution occurs prior to payments being made under
this
schedule, then successor CONSULTANT shall receive subsequent
payments per
this
schedule.
6819w /ARCH #1
PERM.
REV 3
-18-
17 , �1 . .
Vi�
RESOLUTION NO. 6164 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PRELIMINARILY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY OF CURB, GUTTER AND
SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY RAMP IMPROVEMENTS ON A PORTION
OF NIPOMO STREET IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
1. That the Council hereby preliminarily determines that the public
interest, necessity and convenience require the construction of curb,
gutter and sidewalk, and driveway ramp improvements on a portion of Nipomo
Street within the City of San Luis Obispo as set forth on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
2. That March 17, 1987 at 7:10 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, is the time and
place set for public hearing on said matter, and notice thereof shall be
Published twice in the Telegram - Tribune, a newspaper of general
circulation in said City; the first publication to be at least twenty (20)
days prior to said hearing. Copies of said notice shall be posted in
accordance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section 12.12.020(B).
3. That subject to any modifications or exceptions declared by the
Council at the close of said hearing, said parcels shall be so improved by
the property owner, or the City Engineer shall proceed to have the work
done and the cost thereof shall be made a lien against the property in
accordance with Sections 12.12.010 et seq. of the San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code.
R 6164
V
Resolution No. 6164 (1987 Series)
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey
D
, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Griffiq
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin, and Councilman Settle
NOES: Councilwoman Rappa
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the following resolution was passed and adopted this .17th day of
February , 1987
ATT ST:
CITA CLERK PAMELA VVA ES
s s x s s s a s s
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City AAorney
Public Works Director
Finance Dire or
nipomores /dfr #5
pr
LOCATION
682 Palm (Nipomo Side)
6r-wll
EXHIBIT "A"
NOTE: C = Curb b Gutter
S = Sidewalk
R = Driveway Ramp
IMPROVEMENTS
PARCEL NO. OWNER REQUIRED
2- 411 -01 Catholic Church, SLO C,S,R
I
/ \
f/ � v
i
Alt.
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
10
City
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
)} SS.
County of San Luis Obispo
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and
interested in the above - entitled matter
I am now, and at all times embra'
I
in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal cl.
i
of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBI!,
COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general'
culation, printed and published daily, Sundays excepted
the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county
state; that _Resolution #6164
of which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy,
published in the above -named newspaper and not in,
supplement thereof — on the following dates, to-wit: —
Feb. 25 & March 7
Ilk
city of San LUIS oBiSpc
RESOLUTION N0, 6164
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL )OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO PRELIMINARILY DETERMINING THE NECESS-
ITY OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY
RAMP INPROVEMENTS ON A PORTION OF NIPOMO
STREET IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as-follows:
1. That the Council hereby preliminarily determines that
the public interest, necessity and convenience require the f
construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, and driveway ramp
improvements on a portion of Nipomo Street within the City
dFSan Luis Obispo as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated by reference.
2. That March 17, 1987 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 990 Palm, Street, San Luis Obispo, !
matter, and is the time and notice thereof shall shallobeop public
Published ce on said the .f
Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the
said City; the first publication to be at least twenty (20) days
prior to said hearing. Copies of notice shall be posted in
accordance with the requirements of Municipal Code Section
12.12.020(8).
'3. That subject to any modifications or exceptions declared
be so improvedaby the of 'property owner, or the City Engineelr
shall proceed to have the work done and the cost thereof
shall be made a lien against the property in accordance with
Sections 12.12.010 et seq. of the San Luis Obispo Municipal
Code:
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey, seconded by Mayor
Pro -Tem Griffin and on the following roll call vote: j
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin, and
Councilman Settle
NOES: Councilwoman Rappa
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the following resolution was passed and adopted this 17th
day of February, 1987.
/s/Robert E. Griffin
MAYOR PRO-TEM
ATTEST:
/s/Pamela Voges
CITY CLERK
Exhibit A
NOTE: C = Curb E Gutter
S = Sidewalk
that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained R = Drivewa Ra
established a newspaper of general circulation by D LOCATION
entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Cc 6� p Palm Sic
State of California, on June 9, 1952, under the provisic Feb. 25; Mar. 7
Chapter 1, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the
State of California.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the fore-
going is true and correct.
(Signature of Principal Clerk)
Date March 7 1 1987
PARCEL IMPROVEMENTS
NO. OWNER REQUIRED
2.411 -01 Catholic Church C,S,R
_ SLO-
m
d
ro
c
k
n
K
X
0
CD
X
a
q
W.
Q
<,
w
M
C
cr
gooA
Q
O
3
J
A_
N
r
r�..
!. W.. „ ..'1: is ...'�,
A
O
c
Z
pn O
A M"
n�
1�
A Z
O ro
p C
A N
O
W
N
I-�J
r.
RESOLUTION NO. 6163 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH SAN LUIS CREEK ASSOCIATES
REGARDING STREET WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENTS AT
3400 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement attached hereto marked "Exhibit All and
incorporated herein by reference between the City of San Luis Obispo and San
Luis Creek Associates, A Limited Partnership, wherein San Luis Creek Associates
conveys to city an easement for road and incidental purposes to allow the city
to install street improvements, is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized
to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk .shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a
copy of the executed agreement approved by it to: San Luis Creek Associates
and the City Engineer.
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of brut
1987.
MAYOR PRO -TEM ROBERT E. IFF N
ATTEST:
CIT CLERK PAMELA lfNES
r r r* r r w r
R 6163
Resolution No. 6163 (1987 Series)
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City Att ney
1'b`Z�tt"u
Community Development Director
/c��
ity Engineer
jk4 /agreement
by
A
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, executed this 17th day of
San Luis Greek Associates,
19 87, by and between a General Partnership
called Grantors, and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO.
February
hereinafter
1. Grantors shall grant a street widening easement (including incidental
purposes) to the City 12,955 square feet (0.2974 acres), more or less,
lying along Prado Road and South Riguera St. as shown on the attached
Exhibit A.
2. In consideration of the easement deed for street widening, City agrees
to install street pavement to future gutter line and bridge widening
( Prado Rd.) to City standards adjacent to Grantors property.
3. City will provide all necessary engineering, relocate utilities and
drainage improvements as necessary:
4. Grantors shall be responsible for installation of standard curb,
gutter, sidewalk as a condition of development of the subject
property.
Approved as to content:
City Administ ative
City En 'veer
Approved as to for
City At rney I %
mb /53- 051 -39
by
ATTE
Cit Clerk Pamela Vog s
Owners:
'd
V %
Jdh-n V. Kuden, Individual
n�t�'v %
SAW/LUIS CREEK ASSOCIATES
J n V. Kuden, Managing Partner
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of Parcel l of Parcel Map SLO 71 -178, recorded - September 8, 1971 in
Book 6 at Page 70 of Parcel Maps, City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis
Obispo, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northerly corner of said Parcel 1; thence South 64021130" East
a distance of 263.64 feet; thence South 26015100" West a distance of 749.87
feet; thence North 64033'49" West a distance of 9 feet +. (Said point distant
42 feet from the centerline of Higuera Street, measured at right angles); thence
North 26015100" East a distance of 705.66 feet; thence along a curve to the
left, with radius of 20 feet, through an angle of 90036'30" a length of 31.63
feet; thence North 6402.1'30" West along a line parallel with the centerline of
Prado Road a distance of 234.43 feet more or less to the Northwesterly line of
said Parcel 1; thence North 26015'00" East along said Northwesterly property
line a distance of 24.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
P. D.B.
N 26° IS' OD` E 24.00'
JOHN V. KUDEN / SAN LUIS CK. AVIX
TO CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FO>R\ S.F}I&UERA j FRAVO WIMINbr
V :.
v €
c € �fi r
N
la
"
0
<0 it SCALE 1" • IDD'
TOTAL AREA
IMS5 sq ff
�Al
bLK
/ 2
RESOLUTION NO. 6162
(1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY AND BECKER AND BELL, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, between the City of
San Luis Obispo and Becker and Bell, Inc., negotiations and
consultant services in employer - employee relations to July 311 1988,
is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of the
resolution to: Becker & Bell, Inc., Personnel Director and Finance
Director.
On motion. of Councilman Settle
, seconded by Councilwoman
Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers SEttle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and .adopted this 17th. day
of February , 1987.
Attest:
V
City Clerk Pamela ges
R 6162
o
Resolution No. 6162
Approved:
City Administrative Officer
City A they
S:
Fin c D" ector
P rsonriel Director --
(1987 Series)
C"�it All
1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
2 AND BECKER & BELL, INC. FOR NEGOTIATIONS AND
3 CONSULTANT SERVICES IN EMPLOYER - EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
4
5
6 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 17th day of February ,
7 1987, by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a political
8 subdivision of the State of California (herein called "City "),
9 and BECKER & BELL, a California corporation (or its assignees),
10 P. 0. Box 2160, Placerville, California 95667 (herein called
11 "Consultant ").
12
13 W I T N E S S E T H
14 WHEREAS, City is obligated pursuant to state law and City
15 policy to meet and confer with recognized employee organizations
16 representing its employees in their employment relations with
17 the city; and
18 WHEREAS, the City desires to engage professional assistance
19 in matters of labor relations representation and negotiations and
20 in accomplishing the process of said meeting and conferring in
21 relation thereto; and
22 WHEREAS, Consultant is a professional labor relations
23 consultant and representative, who is well qualified by education
24 and experience to provide such services; and
25 WHEREAS, City, under authority of the Government Code,
26 proposes to engage Consultant in accordance with the terms and
27 conditions set forth herein to render such services.
28 lIl
1
2
C.; +(
1
NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as
2
follows:"
3
1.
Employment of Consultant. City hereby agrees to engage
4
Consultant, and Consultant hereby agrees to provide the
5
services hereinafter set forth involving labor
G
relations negotiations and the instruction and training
of management personnel in the implementation of labor
8
relations agreements.
9
2.
Contacts. for Responsibility. The City Administrator
10
shall represent the City for the purpose of
11
administering this Agreement. The President of
12
Becker & Bell shall be Consultant's designated
13
representative for the purpose of administering this
14
contract. The individual within Consultant's firm who
15
will provide services to City as set forth in Section 3
16
will be mutually selected by. the parties. Consultant
17
shall not delegate or assign his responsibilities under
18
this contract without the prior expressed written
19
approval of City having first been obtained.
20
3.
Scope of Service. Consultant shall provide his special
21
knowledge, services and skills as follows:
22
a. Consultant shall act as City's principal
23
representative and chief negotiator in labor nego-
24
tiations with the representatives of the bargain -
25
ing unit(s) as assigned by the Administrator..
26
All such representations and negotiations shall
27
abide by the guidelines established by the City,
28
and Consultant shall meet and confer as often as
2
1
is reasonably necessary until agreement with said
2
bargaining unit is reached in conformance with
3
such guidelines, or until the City Administrator
4
has determined, after consultation with
5
Consultant, that agreement is not reasonably
6
possible as to said bargaining unit(s).
7
Consultant shall also act as City's representative
8
at any and all impasse proceedings which may be
9
conducted. Consultant shall meet with the City
10
Council as often as is reasonably necessary during
11
each meet and confer process to review City's
12
position and obtain further instructions.
13
b. As agreement is reached with each employee
14
bargaining unit, a.Memorandum of Understanding
15
will be prepared by Consultant and will be
16
submitted to the City for approval. When so
17
approved, Consultant shall meet with City's
18
management team to explain the provisions of any
19
approved memorandum of understanding developed
20
pursuant to this Agreement and to explain any
21
changes in wages, hours and working conditions
22
instituted by the City following the meet and
23
confer process.
24
C. Consultant shall, as requested, by telephone and
25
in person, advise in grievance handling, assist in
26
arbitration preparation, advise on personnel
27
matters, assist in revision and development of
28
management policies concerning subjects within the
3
1
2
3
4
5
G
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Zti
26
27
28
C,
scope of representation, and assist City Attorney
in the resolution of legal matters related to
labor relations arising out of the agreements
covered herein.
4. City Assistance. City shall assist Consultant by
providing information, personnel, space and facilities
as follows:
a.. Information reasonably within City's control or
accessible to City and which may be helpful to
Consultant in the performance of hi.s services as
provided herein; and
b. A management team composed of members of the
affected departments and at least one (1) member
of the Administrative Staff to assist Consultant
during the meet and confer sessions; and
C. Supplemental clerical and stenographic assistance
as Consultant may reasonably require for the
performance of his services as provided herein;
and
d. A suitable location where meet and confer sessions
may be conducted.
5. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on
February. 1, 1987 and end on July 31, 1988, and
shall continue from year -to -year thereafter unless
either party shall notify the other party in writing of
an intention to modify its terms or terminate this
Agreement in its entirety.
4
l
2
3
4
5
G
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1S
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Said notification shall be determined to have been duly
served upon Consultant if delivered to Consultant in
person, or when deposited postage prepaid for delivery
by U.S. mail addressed to:
Gene Bell
Becker & Bell, Inc.
P. 0. Box 2160
Placerville, CA 95667
or to such address as Consultant may hereafter in
writing direct. Written notice to City shall be
determined to have been duly served if delivered in
person to the City Clerk, City of San Luis Obispo, or
when deposited postage prepaid. for delivery by U.S.
Mail and addressed to:
City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
6. Fee. City agrees to pay Consultant for services
rendered under this Agreement the sum of Ninety Dollars
($90.00) per hour.
7. Expenses. Upon submission of the appropriate billing,
City shall within thirty (30) days reimburse Consultant .
for all reasonable travel expenses, lodging costs, if
necessary, incurred in the performance of this
Agreement.
8. Independent Contractor. It is expressly understood and
agreed to by both parties that Consultant, while
5
1
2
3
4
5
G
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, is an
independent contractor and is not an employee of the
City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement
to be executed on the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By
City Clerk Pamela t es Mayor Pro -Tem Robert i fin
City A orney
S.
Fina c D rector
0
BECKER & BELL, INC.
Gene Bell, President
L'o � /I -
By Don Becker
SAC,,
�l
1
RESOLUTION NO. 6161 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE ACTING
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER TO MODIFY THE CONTRACT
FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES WITH DENNIS E. GREENE & CO..
TO INCREASE THE DOLLAR LIMIT ON SERVICES BY $25,000
WHEREAS, in March 1986 the City requested proposals for real estate appraisal
services; and
WHEREAS, Dennis E. Greene & Co. submitted a proposal meeting all specifications
and was selected to provide appraisal services to the City; and
WHEREAS, since April i986 Dennis Greene has performed appraisal services for the
City satisfactorily.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. The Acting City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to amend
the agreement dated April 8, 1986 between the City and Dennis E. Greene & Co. to
raise the limit for such services by $25,000.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a copy of
the executed agreement approved by it to the Finance Director and the Public Works
Director:
On motion of Councilman.Settle seconded by Councilwoman Rappa and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES:, Councilmembers Settle,'Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin .
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunn _
the foregoing resolution was passed a
1987.
MAYOR
ATT T:
_ V
C ty Clerk Pamei�veges
APPROVED:
Acting City Admin. Officer
S17
Fitn-VFD ector
th
BERT
February ,
R 6161
,' r..
...
,'.1��_ ..
J
CONSULTANT'S SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement, made this 8th day of April , 1986, by and
between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, California (hereinafter referred
to as "City "), and DENNIS GREENE of DENNIS E. GREENE AND COMPANY
(hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to retain a qualified firm to provide real
property appraisal services; and
WHEREAS, City desires to engage Consultant to provide services
by reason of its qualifications and experience for performing such
services, and Consultant has offered to provide the required services
on the terms and in the manner set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PROJECT COORDINATION
a. City. The City Administrative Officer (CAO) shall be the
representative of the city for all purposes under this
agreement. The CAO, or his representative, hereby is
designated as the Project Manager for the City. He shall
supervise the progress and execution of this agreement.
o
u
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 3
(2) Keep itself fully informed of all existing and
proposed federal, state and local laws, ordinances,
regulations, orders, and decrees which may affect
those engaged or employed under this agreement, any
materials used in Consultant's performance under this
agreement, or the conduct of the services under this
agreement;
(3) At all times observe and comply with, and cause all of
its employees to observe and comply with all of said
laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees
mentioned above.
(4) Immediately report to the City's Project Manager in
writing any discrepancy or inconsistency it discovers
in said laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and
decrees mentioned above in relation to any plans,
drawings, specifications, or provisions of this
agreement.
C. Release of reports and information. Any reports,
information, data, or other material given to, or prepared
or assembled by, Consultant under this agreement shall be
the property of City and shall not be made available to any
individual or organization by Consultant without the prior
w::itten approval of the City's Project Manager.
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 4
POM
e.
Copies of reports and information. If City requests
additional copies of reports, drawings, specifications, or
any other material in addition to what the Consultant is
required to furnish in limited quantities as part of the
services under this agreement, Consultant shall provide
such additional copies as are requested, and City shall
compensate Consultant for the costs of duplicating of such
copies at Consultant's direct expense.
Qualifications of Consultant. Consultant represents that
it is qualified to furnish the services described under
this agreement.
3. DUTIES OF CITY
City agrees to cooperate with consultant and to perform that
work described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
this reference.
4. COMPENSATION
The Consultant will perform the work in phases as described in
Exhibit "A ".
Consultant will bill City on a time and material basis upon
completion of the project. City will pay this will within 30 days of
receipt. The Consultant may not charge more than the amount shown in
Exhibit "A" without prior approval of the City's Project Manager.
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 5
5. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK
Program scheduling shall follow the attached chart (Exhibit "A"
unless revisions to the chart are approved by the City's Project
Manager and project's Management Consultant.
Time extensions may be allowed for delays caused by City, other
governmental agencies, or factors not directly brought about by the
negligence or lack of due care on the part of the Consultant:
6. TEMPORARY_SUSPENSION
The CAO shall have the authority to suspend this agreement
wholly or in part, for such period as he deems necessary due to
unfavorable conditions or to the failure on the part of the
Consultant to perform any provision of this agreement. Consultant
will be paid the compensation due and payable to the date of
temporary suspension.
7. SUSPENSION: TERMINATION
a. Right to suspend or terminate. The city retains the right.
to terminate this agreement for any reason by notifying
Consultant in writing seven days prior to termination and
by paying the compensation due and payable to the date of
termination; provided, however, if this agreement is
terminated for fait of Consultant, City shall be obligated
to compensate Consultant only for that portion of
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 6
Consultant services which are of benefit to City. Said
compensation is to be arrived at by mutual agreement of the
City and Consultant and should they fail to agree, then an
independent arbitrator is to be appointed and.his decision
shall be binding upon the parties.
b. Return of materials. Upon such termination, Consultant
shall turn over to the City immediately any and all copies
of studies, sketches, drawings, computations, and other
data, whether or not completed, prepared by Consultant, and.
for which Consultant has received reasonable compensation,
or given to Consultant in connection with this agreement.
Such materials shall become the permanent property of
City. Consultant, however, shall not be liable for City's
use of incomplete materials or for City's use of complete
documents if used for other than the project contemplated
by this agreement.
8. INSPECTION
Consultant shall furnish city with every reasonable opportunity
for City to ascertain that the services of Consultant are being
performed in accordance with the requirements and intentions of this
agreement. All work done and all materials furnished, i.f any, shall
be subject to the C'ity's Project Manager's inspection and approval.
The inspection of such work shall not relieve Consent of any of its
obligations to fulfill its agreement as prescribed.
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 7
9. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
All original drawings, plan documents and other materials
prepared by or in possession of Consultant pursuant to this agreement
shall become the permanent property of the City, and shall be
delivered to the City upon demand.
10. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT
Failure of City to agree with Consultant's independent findings,
conclusions, or recommendations, if the same are called for under
this agreement, on the basis of differences in matters of judgment
shall not be construed as a failure on the part of Consultant to meet
the requirements of this agreement.
11. ASSIGNMENT: SUBCONTRACTORS: EMPLOYEES
This agreement is for the performance of professional real
property appraisal services of the Consultant and. is not assignable
by the Consultant without prior consent of the City in writing. the
Consultant may employ other specialists to perform special services
as required with prior approval by the City.
12. NOTICES
A11 notices hereinunder shall be given in writing and mailed,
postage prepaid, by Certified Mail, addresses as follows:
To City: City Administrative Officer
City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
P.O. .Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
o
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 8
To Consultant: Dennis Greene and Company_
822 13th Street
Suite B
Paso Robles, CA 93446
13. INTEREST OF CONSULTANT
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest, and
shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or
otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the
performance of the services hereunder. Consultant further covenants
that, in the performance of this agreement, no subcontractor or .
person having such an interest shall be employed. Consultant
certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest
under this agreement is an officer or employee of City. It is
expressly agreed that, in the performance of the services hereunder,
Consultant shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and
not an agent or employee of City.
14. INDEMNITY
Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless City,
its officers, agents, and employees of and from:
1. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against
City, its officers, agents or employees by reason of any
injury to or death of any person or corporation caused by
any negligent act or omission of Consultant under this
agreement or of Consultant's employees or agents;
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 9
2. Any and all damage to or destruction of the property of
City, its officers, agents, or employees occupied or used.
by or in the care, custody, or control of Consultant, or in
proximity to the site of Consultant's work, caused by any
negligent act or omission of Consultant under this
agreement or of Consultant's employees or agents;
3. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against
City, its officers, agents, or employees by reason of any
injury to or death of or damage suffered or sustained by
any employee or agent of Consultant under this agreement,
however caused, excepting, however, any such claims and
demands which are the result of the negligence or willful
misconduct of City, its officers, agents, or employees;
4. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against
City, its officers, agents, or employees by reason of any
infringement or alleged infringement of any patent rights
or claims caused by the sue of any apparatus, appliance, or
materials furnished by Consultant under this agreement; and
5. Any and all penalties imposed or damages sought on account
of the violation of any law or regulation or of any term or
condition of any permit, when said violation of any law or
regulation or of any term or condition of any permit is due
to negligence on the part of the Consultant.
Q
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 10
Consultant, at its own costs, expense, and risks, shall
defend any and all suits, actions, or other legal
proceedings that may be brought against or for employees on
any such claim or demand of such third persons, or to
enforce any such penalty, and pay and satisfy any judgment
or decree that may be rendered against City, its officers,
agents, or employees in any such suit, action or other
legal proceeding, when same were due to negligence of the
Consultant.
15. WORKERS COMPENSATION
Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the
Labor Code of the State of California, which require every employer
to be insured against liability for workers compensation or to
undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that
code, and it certifies that it will comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the work of this agreement.
16. INSURANCE
At the request of the City, Consultant shall provide proof of
comprehensive general liability insurance ($500,000) (including
automobile) and professional liability insurance ($250,000)
satisfactory to the City.
o
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 11
17. AGREEMENT BINDING
The terms, covenants, and conditions of this agreement shall
apply to, and shall bind, the heirs, successors, executors,
administrators, assigns, and subcontractors of both parties.
18. WAIVERS
The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any
term, covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any provision,
ordinance, or law shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
subsequent breach of violation of the same or of any other term,
covenant, condition, ordinance, or law. The subsequent acceptance by
either party of any fee or other money which may become due hereunder
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or
violation by the other party of any term, covenant, or condition of
this agreement or of any applicable law or ordinance.
19. COSTS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES
The prevailing party in any action between the parties to this
agreement brought to enforce the terms of this agreement or arising
out of this agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorney's
fees expended in connection with such an action from the other party.
20. DISCRIMINATIOy
No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons
under this agreement because of the race, color, national origin,
ancestry, religion or sex of such person.
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 12
If Consultant is found in violation of the nondiscrimination
provisions of the State of California Fair Employment. Practices Act
or similar provisions of federal law or executive order in the
performance of this agreement, it shall thereby be found in material
breach of this agreement. Thereupon, City shall have the power to
cancel or suspend this agreement, in whole or in part, or to deduct
from the amount payable to Consultant the sum of Twenty -five Dollars
($25) for each person for each calendar day during'-which such person
was discriminated against, as damages for said breach of.contract, or
both. only a finding of the State of California Fair Employment
Practices Commission or the equivalent federal agency or officer
( shall constitute evidence of a violation of contract under his
paragraph.
If Consultant is found in violation of the nondiscrimination
provisions of this agreement or the applicable affirmative action
guidelines pertaining to this agreement, Consultant shall be found in
material breach of the agreement. Thereupon, City shall have the
power to cancel or suspend this agreement, in whole or in part, or to
deduct .from the amount payable to Consultant the sum of Two Hundred
Fifty Dollars ($250) for each calendar day during which Consultant is
found to have been in such noncompliance as damages for said breach
of contract, or both.
Q �J
Consultant's Services Agreement
Page 13
21. AGREEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDERSTANDINGS
This document represents the entire and integrated agreement
between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations,
representations, or agreements, either written or oral. This
document may be amended only by written instrument, signed by both
City and Consultant. All provisions of this agreement are expressly
made conditions. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the.
State of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this
agreement on the day and year first above written.
DENNIS E. GREENE AND COMPANY
B 6Y E. Greene
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By -5
Paul Lanspery
City Administrative officer
Y
EXHIBIT "A"
`�D
.PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF- SERVICES
General Services
Periodically the City of San Luis Obispo requires the professional
services of a qualified real- es "tate appraiser. This agreement is a
contract for such services. Fees and performance schedules will be
negotiated for each appraisal and appended to this contract.
This contract covers the first $10,000 of appraisal services.
Beyond that limit, the City Council must approve an extended
services contract. The city reserves the right to secure approval
for a higher limit at any time. The term of this contract shall be
one year, renewable for one additional year at the city's sole
discretion. Fees shall be based on the following: $75 per hour
for all work except courtroom testimony which will be billed at
$100 per hour.
�ecific Services
The contract shall provide a Fair
City Hall and the underlying land;
underlying land. The city has an
prepared by Marshall and Stevens,
system.
Market Value appraisal of (1)
and (2) the Police Station and-
estimate of replacement Value
Inc., as part of its fixed assets
The schedule and fee shall be as follows:
City Hall $5,000
Police .Station 3;000
TOTAL: $8,000
The appraisal shall be completed in about four weeks.
The city will allow access to the buildings to be appraised_ and
make plans of those available.
C11
B. INHIBITOR COST
VIRCHEM 932 in tank trucks:
Annual average dosage:
W
$0.2125/lb.
0.5 ppm Zn = 53.1 lb /mg
Virchem Cost: 53..1 lb /mgx 0.2125/lb. _ $11.28/mg
Storage Tank:
Metering Pump:
Technical Assistance:
Total Cost:
Less SHMP Cost:
Net Cost:
Supplied by Technical Products
Supplied by Technical Products
Supplied by Technical Products
$11.28/mg
$ 3.00 /mg
$ 8.28/mg
C. Comparison of Corrosion Control Costs
1. SHMP at $3.00 /mg is giving 11.22 mpy corrosion or an increase from
6.23 mpy to 11.22 mpy or 80% increase.
2. VIRCHEM 932 at $9.78/mg will reduce corrosion to 1.02 mpy, a
reduction of 84 %..
D. System Trial Requirement
Dosage Total Pounds
Trial Periods lb /mg MGD _ _ Year
365 days 53.1 10 1941000
The above is based on a requirement of 0.5 ppm of Zn /mg or 53.1 lbs /mg.
A passivation dosage will be utilized at the start of the trial as Was used in the lab
tests. This dosage is 3 ppm Zn or 318.75 lbs /mg for 3 =5 days.
Passivation Requirements
5 ddays x 3 ppm Zn 818.75 Wing x 10 mgd) = 16,000 lbs.
Total Year Requirements
16;000 lbs; Passi a ion Dosage
1949000 lbs. Maintenance Dosage
210,000 lbs. Year
IV. COSTS OF CORROSION
A. Kennedy Engineers, Ine., .Internal Corrosion Study. Report to the City
of Seattle Water Department, February, 1978:
"The overall costs of corrosion - related deterioration of materials
evaluation on an annual basis in terms of 1975 dollars are:
Distribution System $400,000
Residential Plumbing Systems (Seattle) $1.0 million
Residential Plumbing Systems $3.5 million
(Suburban Seattle)
The annual cost of corrosion to a homeowner in Seattle is in the range of
$30 -35:'
B. Asbestos /Cement Pipe Producer's .Association, in Testimony to the U.S.
EPA Public Hearing on Proposed Amendments to the National Interim
Primary Drinking Water Standards, Washington, D.C., August 29, 1979.
Based on research prepared by Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.,
Arlington, Virginia:
"Costs for replacement of water - related pipe corrosion in distribution
systems with aggressive water can range up to $20.16 per capita annually,
With an average of $2.67 per capita annually."
"Water loss from leakage of pipes in distribution systems can amount to as
much as 50 %. A nationwide water loss average is 15 %. Of these water
losses, 38% (equivalent to 6% of distributed water) may be due to
corrosion as a result of aggressive water areas."
"Power requirements are higher in many aggressive water areas because
of decreased flow capacity in corroded pipes"
C. A study by T.J. McKeon, "Cleaning Water Mains with Polyurethane Foam
Plugs," gave the following costs for cleaning 1,000 feet of water main:
Hydrant Flushing $2.25/1000 ft:
Urethane Foam Cubes $40.00/1000 ft.
Mechanical Scraping $1,500.00/1000 ft:
D. Statement of Basis and Purpose for Proposed Amendments to the National
Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations, Office to Drinking Water,
EPA, Washington, D.C., July, 1979.
"In addition to eliminating the health risk associated with the presence of
corrosion products in the water, control of corrosive waters will mean
significant savings because of the losses associated with deterioration of
piping materials. Hudson and Gilcreas (1976) estimated that
implementation of corrosion control measures would cost $27 million
annually. However, this is offset by an estimated annual savings of $375
million, which is the annual loss in deteriorated piping materials due to
corrosion."
"In addition to the loss of materials used to convey water, water leakage
from deteriorated distribution systems can be substantial. In some
instances, as much as 25% of the water leaving a treatment plant is lost
before reaching the consumer."
"Tuberculation of the interior surfaces of metal pipes caused by corrosion
will cause a loss of carrying capacity of the water through the distribution
system." (Larson, 1979)
"Resistance to the flow is caused by the roughening of the interior
surfaces of the pipes by the tubercules and by the reduction of the inner
diameter of the pipe due to the deposition of the corrosion products. In
order to overcome the loss of the carrying capacity, higher pressures have
to-be generated at the pumping stations which in turn requires additional
energy. It has been shown by Hudson (1966) that the cost of transporting
the water increases as the 1.85th power of the 168 _s in efficiency of the
pipe line, and the physical value of the installation decreases almost
directly with the loss of carry capacity."
SUMMARY
Laboratory tests that were conducted at San Luis Obispo Water Filtration
Plant clearly show that sodium hexametaphosphate is not a corrosion inhibitor and
actually is increasing corrosion in the San Luis Obispo distribution system.
Technical Products recommends a one. year plant trial as outlined above.
VIRCHEM 932 when fed as described will reduce corrosion to less. than 2 mpy (1.02
mpy as per tests) or better than 83%.
VIRCHEM 932 will provide the protection to the San Luis Obispo distribution
system as well as to homeowner's and business's plumbing systems. The protection
will meet or exceed existing and future EPA and AWWA standards of corrosion
control. This includes the proposal re- evaluation of the secondard standards.
C,
M
RESOLUTION NO. 6160 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING A PROPOSAL WITH
TECHNICAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION FOR A ONE YEAR PLANT TRIAL,
AUTHORIZING AWARD OF CONTRACT AND DIRECTING TRANSFER OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, there exists a corrosion problem with the city water
distribution system that can be treated and reduced; and
WHEREAS, Technical Products Corporation supplies a product and
service to inhibit corrosion;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
SECTION 1. The certain proposal attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference is hereby approved and the
City Administrative Officer is authorized to execute a contract.
SECTION 2. The City Finance Director shall transfer $5,000 from
Glassy Phosphates (line item 050 -5062- 012 -214) and $13,000 from the
Water Operating Contingency Fund to Planning and Research (line item
050 - 5062 - 008 - 086). <,
On motion of Councilman Settle seconded
by Councilwoman Dovev , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey, Rappa and Mayor Pro =Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was and adopted this3r y of.February,
1987.
MAYOR PRO -TEM ROBERT FFIN
ATTE
CITY CLERK PAMELA V E
Z.
R .6160.
Resolution No. 6160 (1987 Series) Page 2
Approved:
City Administrative Officer
City Atto ey
Finance ector
LO
Utilities Mana
Public Works Director
U - EXHIBIT "A"
SAN LUIS OBISPO WATER DEPARTMENT
SAN LUIS OBISPO WATER FILTRATION PLANT
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA
CORROSION CONTROL PROPOSAL
JULY 29, 1985
r
CORROSION CONTROL PROPOSAL
I. INTRODUCTION
This proposal outlines a program which will show the benefits of using
VIRCHEM 932 in the San Luis Obispo distribution systems. VIRCHEM 932 will
replace sodium hexametaphosphate. which is not an effective corrosion inhibitor.
The principal benefits resulting from the use of VIRCHEM 932 is excellent
corrosion control on metallic surfaces such as iron, copper and lead. EPA data
has established that VIRCHEM 932 also provides protection for asbestos and
cement pipe. These benefits_ will supplement_ the probable secondary standards
ehanges which are under consideration by the EPA at this time.
Supplementary benefits include reduced chlorine demand, reduced main
flushing, reduced sodium in the finished water and above all, reduced corrosion in
users plumbings.
II.
A. Lowered Chlorine Use - VIRCHEM 932 will replace sodium
hexametaphosphate. Lowered corrosion rates will permit a more effective use of
chlorine. Corrosion by- products have an affinity for chlorine. Acutal cost
reductions can only be realized through actual use of VIRCHEM 932. A 15 -30%
reduction is estimated.
B. Corrosion Control - Comprehensive coupon testing using the
VIRCHEM model 2902 test unit was conducted at the San Luis Obispo Filtration
plant.
Coupon test data shows that sodium hexametaphosphate actually increases
corrosion by 80 %. VIRCHEM 932 decreased corrosion by 84% and reduces
corrosion below 2 mpy (mils per year).
C. Coupon Test Data
1. Test #1 ; ;emu•
Plant effluent with .5 m of SHMP.`
April 22, 1985 to May 16, 1985
Coupon N82 11.62 mpy
Coupon N83 10.83 mpy
Average 11.22 mpy
2: Test #2
Filtered water (before SHMP added)
April 22, 1985 to May.16, 1985
CONTROL _ TEST. .
N528 -- -- 5.77 mpy N526 1.13 mpy
t N529 6.69 mpy N527 .93 mpy
Average 6.23 mpy 1.02 mpy
VIRCHEM 932 was added at the rate of .5 ppm Zn (rate of 53.1 lbs.
product /mg) after the coupons on the control, but before test coupons. (See
model 2902 literature).
This data shows that SHMP is increasing corrosion. VIRCHEM 932 will
reduce corrosion (filtered water before SHMP or if SHMP is discontinued) by
83.6 %.
Corrosion test data attached.
3. The following ASTMD 2688 -70 and NACE Standard Tm -01 -69 are
generally recognized as corrosivity guidelines. The weight loss on- metal coupons
.axe as follows:
Weight Loss - MPY
Corrosion
0 =2 mpy
al
Minim-
2 -5 mpy
mild
5 -10 mpy
moderate
10+ mpy
severe
Data shows plant effluent (now treated with SHMP) is in the severe range.
VIRCHEM 932 will reduce corrosion to the minimal range.
VIRC13EM 932 was fed at a passivation dosage of 3 ppm for 75.5 hours With
.5 ppm of Zn for 495 hours.
4. Reduction in Flushing Times and Costs. The use of VIRCHEM 932 at
San Luis Obispo should result in the reduction_ of flushing frequency, and reduction
in the costs associated with this program:
5. Reduction of Sodium.. The elimination of sodium hexametaphosphate,
will reduce the amount of Na+ in your water. VIRCHEM 932 has no Na +.
6. Maintenance of "C" Factors. The use of VIRCHEM 932 will lay down a
monomolecular film 3 to 20 -microns thick over all tuberculated and pitted
surfaces. This film will help to prevent the further decline in "C" factors caused
by corrosion and deposits.
III. PLANT TRIAL PROPOSAL
To establish the effectiveness of VIRCHEM 932 in treating San Luis Obispo
water, a one year plant trial using VIRCHEM 932 is proposed. This proposal .is
based on the coupon test data.
Present average SHMP use .5 ppm:
4.17 lb /mg
Present SHMP Cost:
$0.719/lb.
Present Plant Finished Water pH:
7.2-7.4
Present Plant Filtered Water pH:
7.2-7.4
Present Plant Output:
10 MGD
A. Present Chemical Cost
_5 ppm SHMP x 8.34 lb /mg x $0.719/lb. = $3.00 /mg
RESOLUTION NO. 6159 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1476
LOCATED AT 3057 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of the tentative map of
Tract 1476 and the Planning Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations and
reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The tentative map is consistent with the general plan.
2. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the general plan.
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed.
4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage
or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause public health problems.
7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements for access through or
use of property within the proposed subdivision.
8. The Community Development Director has determined that the subdivision is exempt from
environmental review.
SECTION 2. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative map for Tract 1476 be
subject to the following conditions:
1. Final map shall show a 10 -foot public drainage easement in the southwest corner of
the site to connect with an easement on the adjacent property to the south.
2. Subdivider shall grant an easement over the common lot area, except under structures,
for underground public utilities serving the site to the approval of the City
Engineer and affected utility companies.
3. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and restrictions to be approved by
the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to final map approval.
CC&R's shall contain the following provisions:
A.• Creation of a homeowner's association to enforce the CC &R's and provide for
professional, perpetual maintenance of all common area included private
driveways, private utilities, including on -site sewer and water drainage,
parking lot area, walls and fences, lighting, landscaping in a first class
condition.
R 615'9
Resolution No. 6159 (1987 Series)
Tract 1476
Page 2
B. Grant to the city the right to maintain common area if the homeowner's
association fails to perform, and to assess the homeowner's association for
expenses incurred, and the right of the city to inspect the site at mutually
agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's and final map are being met.
C. Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles on a complaint basis which_
are parked in unauthorized places.
D. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhotnes, or trailers nor long =term
storage of inoperable vehicles, except in designated storage areas by park
residents.
E. No change in city- required provisions of the CC &R's without prior City Council
approval.
F. Homeowner's association shall file with the City Clerk the names and addresses
of all officers of the homeowner's association within 15 days of any change in
officers of the association.
4. Approval of the subdivision and resultant conversion is contingent on implementation
of the .programs outlined in the submitted tenant impact report (dated December 24,
1986). The applicant. shall prepare a contract or other suitable agreement as
approved by the City Attorney to help ensure on -going compliance by the residents'
association with all the various provisions of said impact report and this approval.
5. The tenant protection program in the tenant impact report shall be revised to include
the following provision`.
For low- income households, if the mortgage and related monthly payments as
computed under the best purchase option are higher than the present rent by 10
percent, then the household shall be offered a lease under a stabilized rent
program, modified on the city rent control ordinance: The base rent for the
lease shall be the rent at the time of conversion. The provisionsof the lease
shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director and City
Attorney to help ensure compliance with these conditions.
6. Prior to approval of the final map, applicant shall distribute a notification form to
residents advising them that an assistance program for some moderate income
households is being contemplated and asking that persons who may be interested and
who may qualify should submit forms, supplied by the applicant, indicating their
interest. Interested parties should indicate their levels of income and assets as
part of the preliminary qualification process. Reasonable confidentiality shall be
observed.
Using this data, the applicant shall propose a more specific assistance program for
at least those households between 86 and 90 percent of the median income. This
program shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council prior to approval .
of the final tract map.
Resolution No. 615:9 (1987 Series)
Tract 1476
Page 3
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa, seconded by Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd . day of February
1987.
Robert F/. Mayor Pro -Tem
ATT
Cit Clerk Pamela V es
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
4 -_
City A lorney
Community Development .Director
c 7.-��i �
v � , , ✓�
�z-�v
���f�
�� / ���
Resolution No. 6115;'$•(1987: Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBIPSPO
ADOPTING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the City Council established the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) as a
continuing special purpose advisory body; and
WHEREAS, the CHC is responsible for the administration of the city's historical
preservation program; and
WHEREAS, The CHC and the City Council want to establish benifit programs and provide
assistance that encourages people to undertake preservation activities; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the Historical Preservation Guidelines
submitted by the CHC and has recommended that they be adopted.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
1. The Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" as
amended, are hereby adopted.
2. The Community Development Department shall publish these guidelines and make them
available to the public.
3. Resolution No 6097 (1986 Series) is hereby recinded.
On Motion of Councilman Settle seconded by Councilwoman Dovey
and on the following role call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro —Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Rappa and Mayor Dunin
R 615 8,
Resolution No. 615�!(1987_;Series)
Page 2
the foregoing reso
1 987.
ATTEST:
passed and ad
r
(Vx .
Mayor Pro- Teb,'Robert
06 - �. - � (-.. z 95
Ci Clerk Pamela Vog
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
�f
City Attok ey
/�iliL2iw °6!'f�f
Community Development Director
this rd day of February ,
i�
C (l � vf!! Llc� .
a In m
9
7.
w
A4
v:jn"
I-.. ....
'URIC
TIC
. ...... . . .... ...... . .
I MINI,
��I
-4flf I t1l
HISTVRiCrlkl
5E3ELVATION
GRAM Ao
FELINES
In
'SA �1
i �A�II��IIIII�Jlllfll`���I�i.�i
A * .
,1
4-41
4 4. - ay........ .. .... ..,...... 1➢iillll r '^
i
=i
(L
IP
4
n
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
A. Why Historical Preservation? ......... ....................... .....1
B. What Properties are Historically Important ? .........................2
1. Historical Resources
2. Historical Preservation Districts
C. Benefits and Services Offered by the City. .... _.... 4
1. Rehabilitation Assistance Program
2. Alternative Building Code
3. Inspection Services
4. Local Landmark Program
5. Preservation Library
6. Preservation Counseling
7. Summer Walking Tours
8. Speakers Bureau .
D. Principles of Historical Preservation _..._......._...._.......:6
1. Changing the Exterior of Historic Buildings
2. Constructing New Buildings
3. Demolishing Historic Buildings
E. Historical Preservation and Architectural Review ...................8
Appendix
A. City Council Resolution establishing the role and duties of the Cultural Heritage Committee.
B. List of properties on the Master List of Historical Resources.
C. Procedures for adding properties to the Master List of Historical Resources.
D. List of "contributing" properties within Historical Preservation Districts.
E. Procedures for amending or establishing Historical Preservation Districts.
F. Rehabilitation Assistance Program Guidelines.
G. Information about the National Register of Historic Places.
H. Resolution No. 6158 adopting the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines.
to make rehabilitation more feasible, or possible relocation of the structure to a more suitable site.
The demolition of a Historical Resource is the least favored option and should be done only when (1) the
condition of the building poses a threat to the health, safety or welfare of community residents or People
living or working on or near the site, or (Z) the project sponsor demonstrates that it is financially infeasible
to rehabilitate the structure or preserve the historic nature of the site.
For information about the city's development and demolition permit processes, contact the Building Division
(549 - 7180). The staff can explain how these permit procedures apply to historic buildings..
E. HISTORICAL PRESERVATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Proposals to construct or modify commercial buildings, condominiums or apartments are subject to the city's
architectural review process. New buildings and major modifications to existing buildings are reviewed by the
Architectural Review Commission (ARC). Minor or incidental modifications to elosting buildings are
normally reviewed by the Community Development Director.
The City's architectural review process may also apply to a proposal to change a historic building or to
construct a new building in a Historical Preservation District. When the ARC or the Director are reviewing
construction projects or proposals to demolish historic buildings, they may ask for advice from the Cultural
Heritage Committee.
Guidelines that describe the architectural review process are available from the community Development
Department.. For more information about what might be required, contact the department.
11
0
10
11
I
iM
APPENDIX
A. City Council Resolution establishing the role and duties of the Cultural Heritage
Committee (CHC)
B. List of properties on the Master List of Historical Resources.
C. Procedures for adding properties to the Master List of Historical Resources.
D. List of "contributing" properties within Historical Preservation Districts.
E. Procedures for amending or establishing Historical Preservation Districts.
F. Rehabilitation Assistance Program Guidelines.
G. Information about the National Register of Historic Places.
H. Resolution No. 6158 adopting the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines.
APPENax A a '�
RESOLUTION NO. 6157 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DEFINING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION GOALS AND ESTABLISHING THE
CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE AS A CONTINUING SPECIAL PURPOSE
ADVISORY BODY.
WHEREAS, The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) was created in 1981 as a temporary
committee to complete an inventory of community historical resources and oversee the
development of a Historical Preservation Program; and
WHEREAS, the CHC completed an initial inventory of the community's historical,
architectural and cultural resources in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted resolution 5197 (1983 series) that establishes an
official listing of historical resources; and
WHEREAS, the CHC, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission, City Council,
city staff and the public have evaluated numerous alternatives for establishing a
Historical Preservation Program; and
WHEREAS, on October 7, 1986 the City Council adopted Resolution 6097 which
established preservation program guidelines and directed staff to prepare ordinances and
other materials needed to establish a preservation program; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish the CHC as a continuing special purpose
advisory body to help administer the program; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to set forth the goals of the city's historical
preservation program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
Section : Intent of Historical Preservation. It is in the public interest to
protect and preserve historical, architectural, and cultural resources including
monuments, sites, objects, structures, buildings and other designated areas.
Section 2: Historical Preservation Goals. The city's Historical Preservation
Program should:
0 0
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series)
Page 2
A. Foster civic and neighborhood pride and a sense of identity based on the recognition
and use of Historical Resources;
B. Promote the enjoyment and use of Historical Resources appropriate for the education
and recreation of the people of the city;
C. Encourage public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the city's past;
D. Safeguard the heritage of the city by providing for the preservation of Historical
Resources which represent significant elements of its history.
E. Protect property values and increase economic and financial benefits to the city and
its inhabitants;
F. Protect and enhance the city's attractions to residents and visitors;
G. Encourage architectural styles within Historical preservation Districts which reflect
established architectural traditions.
H. Conserve valuable materials and energy resources by continuing to use and maintain
existing buildings.
Section 3: Cultural Heritage Committee (CHO The CHC is hereby established as a
continuing special purpose advisory body.
A. Membership. The CHC shall have 7 members. The members of the CHC shall include a
person knowledgeable in local history, a person with training or experience in
structural rehabilitation, and a person with knowledge of architecture.
The membership shall include one city resident from each of the three Historical
Preservation Districts created by Ordinance No. 1086 (1987 Series).
B. Term . The terms of committee members shall be four years.
C. Functions and Duties. The CHC will:
(1) Collect, consolidate and make available information about Historical Resources and
Historical Resource Sites and promote, participate in, or sponsor education and
interpretive programs.
(2) Provide advice and guidance for the restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping
or maintenance of Historical Resources or properties within Historical Preservation
Districts.
r
0
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series)
Page 3
(3) Review the Inventory of Historical Resources and recommend to the City Council
any amendments.
(4) Assist property owners with the preparation of National Register applications for
for Historical Resource Sites.
(5) Help to administer benefit programs approved by the City Council that are
directed at preserving Historical Resources or resources within Historical
Preservation Districts.
(6) Publish and maintain Historical Preservation Program Guidelines which present (a)
benefit programs sponsored by the city; (b) procedures for adding properties to the
Inventory of Historical Resources or for establishing a Historical District; and
(c) other information concerning historical preservation.
(7) Review actions proposed by public agencies and provide information on how such
actions may affect designated or eligible properties within or adjacent to Historical
Districts.
(8) Cooperate with local, state, and federal agencies in the pursuit of historical
preservation.
(9) Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Bodies Handbook and
perform other duties as assigned by the City Council.
Section 4: Definitions. The following words and phrases shall have the following
meaning:
(1) Historical Preservation District. Any area which has been so designated under
Chapter 17.54 (Zoning Regulations).
(2) Historical Resource or Historical Resource Site. Any improvements, buildings,
sites, areas or objects of scientific, aesthetic, educational, cultural,
architectural or historical significance that have been designated by resolution of
the Council and included in the Inventory of Historical Resources.
Historical Resources or Historical Resource Sites are classified as follows:
Priority #1: Already placed on the National Register.
Priority #2: Determined eligible for the National Register.
Priority #3: Eligible for the National Register.
Priority #4: Potentially eligible for the National Register.
Priority #5: Not eligible for the National Register but significant at a local
level.
(3) Inventory of Historical Resources. All properties listed by address in the
Completion Report (approved by City Council Resolution No. 5197, 1983 Series) and any
other properties subsequently added to this listing by resolution of the City
Council.
Section 5: Resolution No. 4660 (1981 Series), that established the temporary
Cultural Heritage Committee, is hereby rescinded.
A O '
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series) _
Page 4
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey , seconded by Councilman Settle, and on the
following role call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of February ,
1987.
r
Mayor Pro -Tdi Robert
ATTEST:
C Clerk Pamela es
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City Attor+ ey
Community Development Director
RESOLUTION N0.6 5 9 3 (1989 Series)
AN RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 6157 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE CULTURAL HERITAGE
COMMITTEE (CHC) AND RESOLUTION NO. 6253 WHICH ADOPTED CHC BYLAWS
WHEREAS, in October 1988 the City Council amended the Advisory Body Handbook and
requested that all city commissions and committees submit amendments to pertinent
ordinances or bylaws needed to achieve consistency with the new handbook; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 1989, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed its bylaws and
resolution that created it, and forwarded recommendations to the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Amendments to Resolution # 6157, as shown on attached Exhibit "A"
incorporated herein by reference, are hereby approved.
SECTION 2. Amendments to Resolution # 6253 (CHC bylaws), as shown on attached
Exhibit "B" incorporated herein by reference, are hereby approved.
On motion of vice -Mayor Piinard, seconded by Councilmember Rappa, and
the following role call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Reiss and Settle
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 221 day of March
1989
Mayor
(TTEST:
dlity Clerk
Resolution No. (1989 Series)
Page 2
APPROVED:
�� 1
Cit Administrati a Officer
City At ney
Community Development Director
10
9�
/g'�G9ocaan v
MASTER LIST G F HISTORIC RESOURCES
Adopted- end 1983 Amed: December 1990
Serial Number°
Historic District
Address
1451 Andrews Vc
0001 -03R
148
0002 -04R
0003-04A
Downtown
963 Broad✓
0004-04R
0004 -04R
Town
1345 Broadi fi;f "v
0005 -04R
Old Town
1411 Broad ✓
0006 -04R
Old Town
1426 Broad V
0007 -04R
Old Town
1435 Broad a`'
0008-04R
Old Town
1445 BroadAPfc4o
0009-03R
Old Old Town
1504 Broad sceAv++
0010 -044R
Old Town
1510 Broad✓
0011 -04R
Old Town
1516 Broad %
0012 -04R
Old Town
1630 Broad:f
0013 -01R
Old Town
714 Buchon
0014 -04R
Old Town
726 Buchon✓
'
001 5 -04R
Old Town
i
743 Buchon
ra
0015 -04R
Old Town
745 Buchon,.'
R
0017 -040018
Old Town
751 Buchon;%
-04ft
Old Town
752 Buchon../
0019 -04R
Old Town
771 Buchon /
0020 -04R
Old Town
779 Buchon: /
0021 -04R
Old Town
785 Buchon '
0022 -03R
Old Town
793 Buchon
`
0023 -03R
Old Town
794 Buchon,;
'
0024 -04R
Old Town
850 Buchon:.,
0025 -04R
Old Town
860 Buchon`
0026 -04R
Old Town
890 Buchon;
0027 -04R
Old Town
896 Buchon� �, ,,, .r: -,
" '
< -:. 0028 -04R
868 Chorrd'�� L% f% h'�
0127 -0
Downtown
941 Chorrov
0029 -033R R
Downtown
964 Chorro ✓
Chorro /1,
0100 -05C
Downtown
1026
1029 Chorro V'
0101 -05C
Downtown
Downtown
1033 Chorro ✓
5C
0102 -00030
1306 Chorro, %
-05C
0031 -04R
1318 Chorro;/
R
0032 -00033
Old Town
.(1516) 1518 Chorrov'
-033R
Old Town
rov
1546 ChorrrW
/^
1746 Choi i ho eA
`
0034 -05R
1907 Chorro/40"
R. -0
0035 5
Downtown
466 DanaV"
0035 -05R .
X
*Serial Number: 0000-
Sequential
0 0
National Register Rating
Type of Structure
R = Residential
Number
1 = Already placed on the National Register
eligible for the National Register
C = Commercial
2 = Determined
3 = Eligible for the National Register
O = Other
4 = potentially eligible for the National Register a local level 9 91
Not eligible for the National Register but signifi cant at
5 =
Address
Serial Number*
Historic District
532 Dana,/
0037 -04R
Downtown
550 Dana✓
0038 -04R
Downtown
1119 Garden ✓
0103 -04C
Downtown
1123 -27 Garden ✓
0104 -05C
Downtown
1129 -33 Garden ✓
0105 -05C
Downtown
3.130 Garden ✓
0106 -05C
Downtown
1212 GardenA ✓. %t * /,,
0039 -04C
2132 -34 Harris
0040 -64R
75 HigueraA5 Higuera)/Ag0f, *+n+ 0107 -05C
236 Higuera,/
0108 -05C
570 Higuera✓
0109 -05C
719 Higuera✓
0110 -05C
Downtown
726 Higuera✓
0111 -03C
Downtown
736 -38 Higuera ✓
0112 -04C
Downtown
740 Higuera ✓
0113 -05C
Downtown
767 Higuera v/
0114 -03C
Downtown
777 Higuera✓
0115 =03C
Downtown
796 Higuera/
0116 -05C
Downtown
799 Higuera ✓
0117 -05C
Downtown
842-46 Higuera,/
0118 -04C
Downtown
849 Higuera✓
0119 -05C
Downtown
852 -56 Higuera ✓
0120 -051
Downtown
461 Islay r/
0041 -04R
463 Islay I,--
0042 -05R
497 Islay ✓'
0043 -05R
535 Islay ✓
0044 -04R
Old Town
591 Islay s."
0045 -05R
Old Town
1 644 may V/
0046-05R
Old Town
670 Islay ✓
0047 -04R
Old Town
687 Islayf/
0048 -03R
Old Town
_ 690 Islay 6-`
0049 -04R
Old Town
790 IslaylC4oreo ✓
0050 -04R
Old Town
777 Johnson
0051 -05R
Mill Street
1720 Johnson
0052 -03R
1019 -23 Leff ✓
0058 -04R
Old Town
100 Madonna ✓
0121 -04C
536 Marsh 14 � � �
►
� `� 0054 -030
547 Marsh r/
0055 -04R
774 Marsh✓
0122 -04C
Downtown
859 Marsh ✓
0123 -03C
893 Marsh (889 Marsh) /tro..a 0124 -05C
901 -81 Marsh Pmato. C1w•vd ✓ 0125 -03C
1117 -19 Marsh,,:
0056 -04R
1129 Marsh ✓"
0057 -04R
1135 Marsh-`
0058 -04R
1141 -43 Marsh:-,/'
0059 -04R
*Serial Number: 0000-
0 0
%
Sequential
National-Register Rating
Type of Structure
Number 1
1 = Already placed on the National Register
R = Residential
2 = Determined eligible for the National Register
C'= Commercial
3 = Eligible for the National Register
0 = Other
4 = Potentially eligible for the National Register
;ham
5 = Not eligible for the National Register but significant
at a local level 9 -91
A _
Address Serial Number" Historic District
1145 Marsh<<- "
0060 -04R
1160 Marsh -"
0126 -03C
1167 Marsh✓
0061 -05R
1305 Marsh ✓
0062 -05R
1266 Mill ✓
0063 -04R
Mill Street
1306 Mill ✓
0064 -04R
Mill Street
1330 Mill %j
0065 -05R
AM Street
1424 Mill
0066 -05R
1460 Mill
0067 -04R
642 Monterey.: -�
0068-03R
Downtown
664 Montereyr✓
0069 -04R
-Downtown
696 Monterey✓
0128 -030
Downtown
747 Monterey,/
0070 -030
Downtown
848 Monterey✓
0129 -05C
Downtown
849 Montereyi/
0130 -03C
Downtown
868-70 Monterey-,"'
0131 -03C
Downtown
951 -65 Monterey ✓
0132 -05C
Downtown
962 Monterey ✓
0133-05C
Downtown
969 Monterey ✓
0134 -05C
Downtown
978-98 Monterey r✓
0135 -03C
Downtown
.1035 Monter ✓ % �, .:..
0136 -03C
Downtown
1815 Monterey /.4"*&&,,�5f ✓ 0187 -03C
2223 Monterey IV/ ✓
0138 -03C
1406 Morro /P#Nmv r'
0071 -04R
Old Town
1624 Morro
0072 -04R
Old Town
1636 Morro 1,,
0073 -04R
Old Town
1642 Morro,,
0074 -04R.
Old Town
991 Nipomo✓
0139 -05C
Downtown
1015 Nipomo✓
0140 -05C
Downtown
1204 Nipomolftv4 r/
0075 -05R
1344 Nipomo /A_:P o ✓
0141 -030
Old Town
1407 Nipomo^' owo ✓
0076 -04R
Old Town
1428 Nipomo ✓
0077 -05R
Old Town
1446 Nipomo`
0078 -05R
Old Town
890 Osos✓
0079 -04R
Downtown
976 Osos (980 Osos)r/
0142 -040
Downtown
1301 t/
0143 -030
1443 Osos /6"c�� ✓
0080 -03R
Old Town
1700 Osos /��
0081 -05R
Old Town
1716 Osos ✓
0082 -04R
Old Town
1815 Osos ✓
0144 -05C
Old Town
863 Pacific V ,
0145 -04C
1106 Pacificv/
0146 -03C
1185 Pacific,/
0083 -030
800 Palm,/
0147 -03C
Downtown
1144 Palms,.,
0084 -03R
*Serial Number. 0000-
0 0
X
Sequential
National Register Rating
Type of Structure
Number
1 = Already placed on the National Register
R = Residential
2 = Determined eligible for the National Register
C = Commercial
3 = Eligible for the ]National Register
O = Other
4 = Potentially eligible for the National Register
5 = Not eligible for the National Register but significant at a local level 9 -91
® n
Address
Serial Number'
Historic District
130b Palm/
0085 -05R
Mill Street
Palm✓
0086 -05R
M Street
Mill
71 Palomar
0087 -05R
1127 Peach v" .
0088 -05C
1128 Peach
0089 -04R.
280 Pismo ✓ WWI"
✓
0148 -04C
0090 -03R
Old Town
559 Pismo
0091 -03R
Old Town
649 Pismo ✓'
0092 -05R
Old Town
671 Pismo :,f
676- Pismo �'
0093 -04R
Old Town
1116 Pismo/
0094 -04R
Old Town
Old Town
1123 Pismo//
✓
0095 -05R
49 -04C
Old Town
1011 Railroad
1703 Santa ilroad
tiara v'
0096 -05R
Old Town
1763 Santa Barbara ✓
0152 -04R
Old Town
Old Town
1880 Santa Barbara 4/
0151 -04C
1940 Santa Barbara
0150 -04C
0097 -040
Old Town
1445 Santa Rosa//
0098-05R
Old Town
1531 Santa Rosa✓
843 Upham ✓
0099 -05R
j
*Serial Number: 0000-
Sequential
0 0
National Register Rating
x
Type of Structure
Number
1 = Already placed on the National Register
R = Residential
2 = Determined eligible for the National Register
C = Commercial
3 = Eligible for the National Register
0 = Other
4 = Potentially eligible for the National Register
5 = Not eligible for the National Register but significant at local level 9 -91
I,
APPENDIX C. Procedures for adding properties to the
Master List of Historical Resources.
1. Who Can Apply,
Any person may request that a property be added to the Master List of Historical
Resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee, Architectural Review Commission, Planning
Commission or the City Council may also initiate an application.
2. Where and How to A-V21
A standard application form must be completed and submitted to the Community
Development Department. The form must be accompanied by all available information
that documents the historical importance and architectural character of the building
or site.
There is no fee for applying for Historical Resource designations.
For information about data sources and help with preparing an application, contact the
Cultural Heritage Committee.
3. Actions by the Cultural Heritage Committee, .
The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) will review the application and decide whether
it merits consideration. If the CHC finds that an application merits consideration, a
public hearing will be scheduled and the applicant will be notified.
The time, date and place of the public hearing will be advertised in the Telegram
Tribune newspaper. At the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the
hearing date, the CHC will recommend that the property be added or not added to the
Master List of Historical Resources. When evaluating an application, the CHC will use
the attached criteria.
4. Actions by the City Councit.
Within sixty days from the CHC action on an application, the City Council will decide
if the property should be added to the Master List of Historical Resources. These
decisions will be made at an advertised public hearing. The applicant will be
notified of the hearing date.
In making these decisions, the City Council will consider the CHC's recommendations,
public testimony and application materials. The action of the City Council is final.
If the City Council approves the addition of a property to the Master List of
Historical Resources, the City Clerk will send the applicant a copy of the council
resolution that affirms this action..
City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage committee
DELINEATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE CRITERIA
FOR BUILDING EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA
I. $Lvle
Describes form of building such as size; structural shape -and details within
that form (i.e., arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.)
Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: .
1. The relative purity of a traditional style (as compared to building styles
in San Luis Obispo);
2. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and /or current rarity
although the structure reflects a once popular style;
3. Traditional, vernacular and /or eclectic influences that represent a
particular social milieu and period of the community; and /or the uniqueness
of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together.
4. The degree to which the structure has maintained its integrity (i.e.,
assessment of alterations and structural condition, if known).
II Design
Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic
merit and craftmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular
style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing
of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect (i.e.,
carpenter - builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s).
Building design will be evaluated as a measure of:
1. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness,
artistic merit, details and craftsmanship;
2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though
not necessarily unique;
3. An expression.. of interesting details and eclecticism among
carpenter- builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not
be superior.
E
11
I
I
ie
I
I
III. Aee
Age is a measure of how relatively old a structure is in the context of the
history of San Luis Obispo, primarily Anglo- American history (circa 1850). (See
Scale of Building Age).
CRITERIA FOR BUILDING EVALUATIONS
IV. Architect
Describes the professional (an individual or firm)'directly responsible for the
building design and plans of the structure.
The architect will be evaluated as a reference to:
A master architect (e.g., Wright).
2. A known architect who made significant contributions to the state or region
(e.g., Julia Morgan).
3. An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions
to San Luis Obispo (e.g., Abrahams who, according to local sources,
designed the house at 810 Osos - Frank Avila's father's home built
between 1927 - 30).
4. An early architect who is otherwise of no special significance but can be
identified as a professional (e.g., pioneer architects of the region as
confirmed by AIA archival membership records of California and the Central
Coast).
V. Environmental Design Continuity
Describes the inter - relationship of structures and their relationship to a
common environment. Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship, and'visual
character of a street, neighborhood, or area.
Environmental design continuity will be evaluated as a measure of the:
Symbolic importance of a structure to the community and the degree to which
it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (i.e., easily accessible to
the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place).
2. Compatibility of a structure with neighboring structures in its setting on
the basis of period, style (form, height, roof lines), design elements,
landscapes, and natural. features; and how these combine together to create
an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting.
3. Similarity to and /or compatibility of a structure with its neighboring
structures which, collectively, although of no particular aesthetic value,
combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive
character.
HISTORICAL CRITERIA
VI. History Person i®
Describes a person, group, organization, or institution that has been connected
with the structure, either intimately or secondarily, for at least two
generations (i.e., 40 years).
Historical person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person
or group was:
1. Significant to the community as a public leader (i.e.;-mayor, congressman,
etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition - locally,
regionally, or nationally.
2. Significant to the community as a public servant who has made early,
unique, or outstanding contributions to important local affairs or
institutions (i.e., councilmen, educators, medical professionals,
clergymen, railroad officials). _
3. Contributions which, though minor, directly or indirectly, had a beneficial
effect on the community (i.e., firemen, law enforcement officers, postal
workers, businessmen /shopkeepers, city employees, etc.).
VII. History - Event
Associated with a social, political, economic, governmental, educational or
other institutional event that has been important to the community.
Historical event will be evaluated as a measure of:
1. A landmark, famous, or first -of- its -kind event for the city - regardless of
whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city.
2. A relatively unique or interesting contribution to the city (i.e., the Ah
Louis Store as the center for Chinese- American cultural activities in early
San Luis Obispo history).
3. A contribution which, though minor, nonetheless was important to the
community (i.e., local interest groups); or, alternatively, a unique or
interesting contribution only loosely connected with the structure, object,
site, or district.
VIII. History - Context
Associated with and also-a prime illustration of predominant patterns of
political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental,
military, industrial,. or religious history.
Historical context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it
reflects:
® o
1. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the
historical effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected
with the building (i.e., County Museum).
2. Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the
building (i.e., Park Hotel).
i
3. Secondary patterns of local history but loosely associated with the
building.
Historical context will also be evaluated on the basis of:
4. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and /or whether or not
the original foundation has been changed, if known.
APPENDIX D: Listing of "Contributing Properties within Historical
Preservation Districts
1428 BEACH
1144 BUCHON
6B6 HIGUERA
1035 ISLAY
1520 BEACH
1145 BUCHON
698 HIGUERA
1040 ISLAY
1019 BROAD
1151 BUCHON
699 HIGUERA
1044 ISLAY
1405 BROAD
1152 BUCHOH
705 HIGUERA
1045 ISLAY
1408 BROAD
1153 BUCHON
715 HIGUERA
1052 ISLAY
1418 BROAD
1157 BUCHON
717 HIGUERA
1053 ISLAM'
1421 BROAD
1160 BUCHON
718 HIGUERA
1061 ISLAY
1427 BROAD'
1165 BUCHON
723 HIGUERA
1071 ISLAY
1505 BROAD
1170 BUCHOM
725 HIGUERA
1117 ISLAY
1511 BROAD
1175 BUCHON
728 HIGUERA
1120 ISLAY
1519 BROAD
1176 BUCHOH
733 HIGUERA
1121 ISLAY
1536 BROAD
1182 BUCHON
746 HIGUERA
773 JOHNSON
530 8 UCH ON
1189 BUCHON
751 HIGUERA
879 JOHNSON
533 BUCHON
1190 8UCHON
770 HIGUERA
949 JOHNSON
540 BUCHON
950 CHORRO
778 HIGUERA
955 JOHNSON
541 BUCHON
970 CHORRO
779 NIGUERA
957 JOHNSON
549 BUCHON
978 CHORRO
782 HIGUERA
966 LEFF
575 BUCHON
980 CHORRO
858 HIGUERA
976 LEFF
576 BUCHON
1023 CHORRO
970 HIGUERA
1020 LEFF
586 BUCHON
1023 CHORRO
995 HIGUERA
1027 LEFF
641 BUCHON
1111 CHORRO
539 ISLAY
1028 LEFF
651 BUCHON
1119 CHORRO
542 ISLAY
1035 LEFF
654 BUCHON
1534 CHORRO
550 ISLAY
1045 LEFF
658 BUCHON
1603 CHORRO
559 ISLAY
1051 LEFF
665 BUCHON
B82 CHURCH
572 ISLAY
1059 LEFF
670 BUCHON
B88 CHURCH
654 ISLAY
742 MARSH
673 SUCHON
893 CHURCH
655 ISLAY
778 MARSH
676 SUCHON
971 CHURCH
662 ISLAY
1162 MILL
677 SUCHON
972 CHURCH
663 ISLAY
1165 MILL
685 BUCHON
1010 CHURCH
675 ISLAY
1168 MILL
722 BUCHON
1018 CHURCH
676 ISLAY
1202 MILL
770 BUCHON
1028 CHURCH
727 ISLAY
1214 MILL
871 BUCHON
1034 CHURCH
744 ISLAY
1217 MILL
880 BUCHON
465 DANA
752 ISLAY
1228 MILL
885 BUCHON
469 DANA
753 ISLAY
1234 MILL
889 BUCHON
515 DANA
770 ISLAY
1237 MILL
966 BUCHON
522 DANA
827 ISLAY
1244 MILL
973 BUCHON
525 DANA
662 ISLAY
1253 MILL
977 BUCHON
531 DANA
868 ISLAY
1261 MILL
1003 SUCHON
543 DANA
878 ISLAY
1262 MILL
1015 SUCHON
547 DANA
879 ISLAY
1265 MILL
1035 BUCHON
577 DANA
893 ISLAY
1307 MILL
1045 BUCHON
579 DANA
969 ISLAY
1318 MILL
1051 BUCHON
581 DANA
974 ISLAY
1323 MILL
1057 BUCHON
585 DANA
976 ISLAY
1333'M1LL
1067 BUCHON
595 DANA
978 ISLAY
1343 MILL
1110 BUCHON
1110 GARDEN
980 ISLAY
1344 MILL
1118 BUCHOM
1408 GARDEN
1005 ISLAY
1350 MILL
1124 BUCHON
1421 GARDEN
1011 ISLAY
1355 MILL
1126 BUCHON
1425 GARDEN
1017 ISLAY
1360 MILL
1132 BUCHON
1536 GARDEN
1018 ISLAY
1367 MILL
1135 BUCHON
673 HIGUERA
1029 ISLAY
614 MONTEREY
1137 BUCHON
685 HIGUERA
1034 ISLAY
652 MONTEREY
654 MONTEREY
656 MONTEREY
658 MONTEREY
667 MONTEREY
667 MONTEREY
667 MONTEREY
679 MONTEREY
680 MONTEREY
640 MONTEREY
857 MONTEREY
861 MONTEREY
1005 MONTEREY
1009 MONTEREY
879 MORRO
1009 MORRO
1336 MORRO
1346 MORRO
1415 MORRO
1415 MORRO
1428 MORRO
1436 MORRO
1444 MORRO
1511 MORRO
1512 MORRO
1520 MORRO
1527 MORRO
1528 MORRO
1535 MORRO
1536 MORRO
1543 MORRO
1544 MORRO
1604 MORRO
1615 MORRO
1720 MORRO
1727 MORRO
1729 MORRO
1731 MORRO
1814 MORRO
1821 MORRO
1829 MORRO
1845 MORRO
970 NIPOMO
972 NIPOMO
1415 NIPOMO
1429 NIPOMO
1438 RIPOMO
1516 NIPOMO
1519 NIPOMO
1527 NIPOMO
1535 NIPOMO
1541 NIPOMO
1341 OSOS
1350 OSOS
1419 OSOS
1421 OSOS
1423 OSOS
1429 OSOS
1511 OSOS
n
1514 OSOS
1521 OSOS
1522 OSOS
1526 OSOS
1529 OSOS
1533 OSOS
1534 OSOS
1541 OSOS
1542 OSOS
1609 OSOS
1638 OSOS
1641 OSOS
1724 OSOS
1734 OSOS
1740 OSOS
1750 OSOS
1814 OSOS
682 PALM
752 PALM
756 PALM
776 PALM
778 PALM
798 PALM
B11 PALM
815 PALM
861 PALM
1014 PALM
1020 PALM
1201 PALM
1208 PALM
1228 PALM
1236 PALM
1243 PALM
1250 PALM
1259 PALM
1264 PALM
1269 PALM
1270 PALM
1317 PALM
1320 PALM
1344 PALM
1347 PALM
1352 PALM
1355 PALM
1359 PALM
1365 PALM
1390 PALM
1134 PEACH
1137-PEACH
1143 PEACH
1151 PEACH
1154 PEACH
1156 PEACH
1163 PEACH
1168 PEACH
1206 PEACH
1209 PEACH
1215 PEACH
861 PEPPER
571 PISMO_
657 PISMO
663 PISMO
683 PISMO
729 PISMO
954 PISMO
956 PISMO
958 PISMO
969 PISMO,
977 PISMO
979 PISMO
985 PISMO
1020 PISMO
1028 PISMO
1036 PISMO
1042 PISMO
1050 PISMO
1060 PISMO
1068 PISMO
1109 PISMO
1126 PISMO
1133 PISMO
1145 PISMO
1147 PISMO
1152 PISMO
1155 PISMO
1160 PISMO
1163 PISMO
1166 PISMO
1171 PISMO
1176 PISMO
1179 PISMO
1185 PISMO
1190 P1SM0
1193 PISMO
1020 RAILROAD
1717 SANTA BARBARA
1725 SANTA BARBARA
1749 SANTA BARBARA
1789 SANTA BARBARA
1901 SANTA BARBARA
1414 SANTA ROSA
1426 SANTA ROSA
1504 SANTA ROSA
1512 SANTA ROSA
1515 SANTA ROSA
1520 SANTA ROSA
1521 SANTA ROSA
1530 SANTA ROSA
1606 SANTA ROSA
1617 SANTA ROSA
1624 SANTA ROSA
1627 SANTA ROSA
1633 SANTA ROSA
1705 SANTA ROSA
1707 SANTA ROSA
1720 SANTA ROSA
1728 SANTA ROSA
1730 SANTA ROSA
1731 SANTA ROSA
675 TORO
762 TORO
770 TORO
771 TORO
778 TORO
780 TORO
855 TORO
858 TORO
862 TORO
865 TORO
872 TORO
898 TORO
1423 TORO
875 UPHAM
0
L
i�
i�
M
APPENDIX E. Procedures for amending or establishing
Historical Preservation Districts.
1. Who Can Annly?
Any person may request that a property or group of properties be included
within or excluded from a Historical Preservation District. The Cultural
Heritage Committee, Planning Commission or the City Council may also initiate
an application.
2. Where and How to Annly.
A standard application for a "rezoning" must be completed and submitted to the
Community Development Department. Also, an applicant must submit:
A map (8 -1/2" x 11 ") from the official zone map, with the area to be
changed shaded or outlined in a heavy, black line, and the proposed change
clearly labeled.
All information that shows how the proposed rezoning (establishment of an
"H" designation) complies with the purpose and application provisions of
Chapter 17.54 of the city's Zoning Regulations (see attached excerpt).
Property owners' list and map showing the area included in the list. (For
instructions on how to prepare the property owners' list, ask for the
instruction sheet at the Community Development Department.)
There is no fee for filing an application to create or amend a Historical
Preservation District. For more information about preparing a rezoning
application, phone or visit the Community Development Department.
3. Actions by the City.
Three groups review and act on applications to amend or create a Historical
Preservation District:
a. The Cultural Heritage Committee will schedule an advertised public hearing
to consider "H" district applications. The CHC will forward its
recommendations to approve or deny an application to the Planning Commission.
b. The Planning Commission will consider the CHC's recommendation and will send
its own recommendations for action on the proposal to the City Council.
c. The City Council will consider the recommendations of the CHC and Planning
Commission and will either approve or deny the application. If the council
approves an application, the City Clerk will send the applicant a copy of the
ordinance that affirms this action.
A
� J
A. WHY HISTORICAL PRESERVATION ??
The City of San Luis Obispo began with the founding of the Old Mission in 1772.
Over the past two centuries the community has gone through many changes. These
changes can be appreciated because many of the older buildings and historic sites
are with us today. These "reminders of the past" help define the character of San
Luis Obispo. One has only to visit the central business district or wander through
surrounding residential areas to imagine what it must have been like back before
automobiles and television.
In order to preserve a sense of the community's history, the city government has
established this preservation program. The city wants to work with its citizens to
promote the preservation of historic and architecturally important buildings and
sites. The preservation of historic buildings and sites maintains our community's
heritage and offers specific economic benefits to the owners of these properties.
Much of the city's historical preservation program is administered by an eleven -
member citizens group called the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC). The duties of
the CHC are further described in the Appendix A of these guidelines. The committee
is assisted by people in the San Luis Obispo Community Development. Department..
To contact the committee or to get more information, phone or visit the Community
Development Department at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, phone (805) 549 -7170.
1
0
(Excerpt from City Zoning Regulations)
Chapter 17.54
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION (H) ZONE
Sections:
17.54.010 Purpose and Application
17.54.020 Allowed Uses
17.54.030 Property. Development Standards
17.54.010 Purpose and Application
A. The H zone identifies parcels, areas or structures that (1) are architecturally or
historically important, and (2) may be eligible for benefits offered through the City's
Historical Preservation Program..
B. The H zone may be applied to areas with any of the following characteristics:
1. The property is within an area where buildings with pre -1941 architectural styles
create a recognizable character.
2. The property or area contains structures which (a) are good or excellent examples
of pre -1941 architecture, or (b) were designed by eminent architects or designers, or (c)
are community architectural landmarks.
3. The property or area contains structures that are included in the city's Master
List of Historical Resources,
4. The property, area or structure was owned or occupied by someone who had a
significant role in the history of the city, region, state or nation.
17.54.020 Allowed Uses.
Uses shall be as provided in the underlying zone. (Ord. 941 sl (part), 1982: prior
code s 9203.16 (B))
17.54.030 Property Development Standards.
Property Development Standards shall be as established by the underlying zone. (Ord.
941 sl (part), 1982: prior. code s9303.16 (C)
.0
w
r-�
\� J
Appendix F
HISTORICAL PRESERVATION
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES BEING DEVELOPED
APPENDIX G
The National
Register of
Historic Places
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
The National Register of Historic Places is the
official list of the Nation's cultural resources
worthy of preservation. Authorized under the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the
National Register is part of a national program
to coordinate and support public and private ef-
forts to identify, evaluate, and protect our
historic and archeological resources. The Na.
tional Register is administered by the National
Park Service under the Secretary of the Interior.
Properties listed in the National Register in-
clude districts, sites, buildings, structures and
objects that are significant in American history,
architecture, archeology, engineering, and cul.
ture. These resources contribute to an under.
standing of the historical and cultural founda-
tions of the Nation.
The National Register includes:
all historic areas in the National Park Sys-
tem;
National Historic Landmarks which have
been designated by the Secretary of the In-
terior for their significance to all Americans;
and
properties significant to the Nation, State, or
community which have been nominated by
the States, Federal agencies and others and
have been approved by the National Park
Service.
Dumbarton Bridge, District of Columbia, (Mary
Randlett).
•
The National Register of
Historic Places
Listing in the National Register has the follow-
ing results which assist in preserving historic
properties-
• Recognition that a property is of significance
to the Nation, the State or the community.
• Consideration in the planning for Federal or
federally assisted projects.
• Eligibility for Federal tax benefits.
• Consideration in the decision to issue a sur-
face coal mining permit.
• Qualification for Federal assistance for historic
preservation, when funds are available.
National Register properties are distinguished
by having been documented and evaluated ac-
cording to uniform standards. The Secretary of
the Interior's National Register criteria for eval-
uation and documentation standards are used
by every State and Territory and by Federal
agencies to identify important historic and ar-
cheological properties worthy of preservation
and of consideration in making planning and
development decisions.
The National Register program provides Fed-
eral, State and local governments and the gen.
eral public the following:
• National recognition of the value of historic
properties individually and collectively to the
Nation.
• Eligibility for Federal tax incentives and
other preservation assistance.
• Assistance in cultural resource planning.
National Recognition
Americans are proud of their heritage and are
honored when properties in their communities
and States are entered in the National Register..
Historic properties in a community are tangible
links with the Nation's past that help provide a
sense of identity and stability. The National
Register, which recognizes the values of proper-
ties as diverse as a dugout shelter of an
Oklahoma pioneer settler, the Breakers Man-
sion in Newport, and a 12,000 -year -old prehis-
toric site, has helped many to appreciate the
richness and variety of their heritage.
Historic Hill District, St. Paul, Mlv (thanes w.
Nelson).
Listing properties in the National Register
often changes the way communities perceive
their historic resources and gives credibility to
efforts of private citizens and public officials to
o
preserve these resources as living parts of our
communities. Listing in the National Register,
however, does not interfere with a. private prop•
erty owner's right to alter, manage or dispose of
property.
Historical commissions, design review commit-
tees, or special zoning ordinances are estab.
lished by State legislation or local ordinances;
they are not a part of the National Register pro -
gram. Information on any State or local law
which may affect a historic property may be ob-
tained from the State Historic Preservation Of-
ficer and the Mayor, City Council or other com-
munity officials.
Preservation Assistance
Private preservation efforts; spurred by the
honor of National Register listing and made
feasible by financial incentives, have resulted in
a rise in the value of historic property and in
the creation of construction, business and
employment opportunities throughout the Na-
tion. Documentation used for evaluating and
registering historic properties is the basis for
decisions about which properties merit tax in-
centives or available Federal assistance and
how these properties should be treated to
respect their historic character.
Tax Incentives for Rehabilitation. Since
1976, the Federal Internal Revenue Code has.
contained a variety of incentives to encourage
:apital investment in historic buildings and to
spur revitalization of historic neighborhoods.
These incentives, including a 25% investment
tax credit, encourage the preservation of historic
commercial, industrial and rental residential
buildings by allowing favorable tax treatments
for rehabilitation and discouraging destruction
of ,historic structures. Preservation tax incen.
tives are available for any project which the
Secretary of the Interior designates as a certified
rehabilitation of a certified historic structure. A
certified historic structure is any structure, sub-
ject to depreciation as defined by the Internal
Revenue Code, which is listed individually in
the National Register or located in a registered
historic district and certified by the Secretary of
the Interior as being of historic significance to
the district. A certified rehabilitation. is any
rehabilitation of a certified historic structure
that the Secretary of the Interior has determined
is consistent with thehistoric character of the
property or the district in which the property is
located. To qualify for the tax incentives, prop-
erty owners must complete a Historic Preserva-
tion Certification Application and secure certifi.
cation from the Secretary of the Interior. Further
information on these incentives and the applica-
tion procedures may be obtained from the Na-
tional Park Service Regional Office responsible
for certification applications in your State, or by
writing: Preservation Tax Incentives, National
Shadou-s -on- the -Teche
Vational Trust %'orHistoric
Preservation), New Iberia,
LA (Gleason Photography).
7.77444,_, Sand Key Lighthouse,
Monroe, FL (JF. Brooks,
H S).
�ar tt _
Castle Clinton National Monument, New York,
NY (Richard Frear, NPS).
Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, D.C. 20240.
Easement Donations. The Federal Internal
Revenue Code also provides for Federal income,
estate, and gift tax deductions for charitable
contributions of partial interests in real proper-
ty (land and buildings). Taxpayers' gifts of
qualified interests must be "exclusively for con.
servation purposes ". One of these purposes is
defined as the preservation of an historically
importf.nt land area or certified historic struc..
ture." Further information on easements may
be obtained from the sources listed above in the
tax incentives section.
Federal Historic Preservation Grants. List-
ing in the National Register qualifies a property
for certain grants when funds are available. In-
formation on this assistance should be obtained
by writing: Preservation Grants, c/o the State
Historic Preservation Officer of the State in
which the property is located.
Cultural Resource Planning
The goals of the preservation programs are to
establish national standards for historic preser-
vation, to identify and document significant
historic resources in the United Sta es, to assist
in preservation efforts by providing
to public and private preservation agencies and
organizations, and to educate the general public
concerning the value of historic preservation.
These programs are carried out for the Secretary
of the Interior by the National Park Service in
cooperation with the State Historic Preservation
Officers, the Federal Preservation Officers, local
governments and citizens. Information gathered
during identification, evaluation and registra•
tion is important in identifying preservation
needs, in planning cultural resource protection
strategies, and in carrying out these strategies.
Federal Activities. Federal agencies are re-
quired by law to locate, inventory and nominate
to the National Register historic properties in
Federal ownership or control. The Federal agen-
cies also are responsible for preserving historic
properties under their ownership or control and
for assuring that any property that might qualify
for inclusion in the National Register is not in-
advertently transferred, sold, demolished, sub -
stantiaily altered or allowed to deteriorate
significantly. If, as a result of Federal action or
assistance, a historic property is to be substan-
tially altered or demolished, records are to be
made for deposit in the Library of Congress or
other agency designated by the Secretary of the
Interior, for future use and reference. Agencies
proposing projects which may affect a property
A
Bridgewater Woolen Mill, Bridgewater, VT
(David Avery).
n
I_
`
Asa. • —��
Timberline Lodge (National Historic
Landmark), Mt. Hood National Forest, OR
(Oregon State Highway DiLision)•
listed in or eligible for the National Register
must allow the Advisory comment HistoriF prior
Preservation an opportunity
to funding, licensing or granting assistance on
such projects. The purpose of this review is not
to impede or halt development, but rather to
assure that the value of historic properties is
given direct consideration in project planning
decisions. Further information on the Advisory
Council may be obtained by writing. the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, The Old Post
Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania. Avenue
N.W., Room 809, Washington, D.C. 20004.
Consideration of historic values is also a. part
of the decision to issue a surface coal mining
permit, in accordance with the Surface Mining.
and Control Act of 1977.
State Activities. Most nominations to the Na-
tional Register are made by the States through
State Historic Preservation Officers. State His.
toric Preservation Programs must be approved
by the Secretary of the Interior before the
States nominate historic properties to the N a.
tional Register.
In addition to nominating historic properties
to the National Register, the State Historic
Preservation Officer prepares and implements a
comprehensive Statewide Historic Preservation
Plan, administers the State program of Federal
assistance for historic preservation within the
State, conducts a statewide survey of historic
properties, and cooperates with Federal, State
and local officials.and others to assure that
historic properties are taken into consideration
at all levels of planning and development. The
State Historic Preservation Officer also provides
public information, education and training, and
i
M
I�
AV
film
A
Bridgewater Woolen Mill, Bridgewater, VT
(David Avery).
n
I_
`
Asa. • —��
Timberline Lodge (National Historic
Landmark), Mt. Hood National Forest, OR
(Oregon State Highway DiLision)•
listed in or eligible for the National Register
must allow the Advisory comment HistoriF prior
Preservation an opportunity
to funding, licensing or granting assistance on
such projects. The purpose of this review is not
to impede or halt development, but rather to
assure that the value of historic properties is
given direct consideration in project planning
decisions. Further information on the Advisory
Council may be obtained by writing. the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, The Old Post
Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania. Avenue
N.W., Room 809, Washington, D.C. 20004.
Consideration of historic values is also a. part
of the decision to issue a surface coal mining
permit, in accordance with the Surface Mining.
and Control Act of 1977.
State Activities. Most nominations to the Na-
tional Register are made by the States through
State Historic Preservation Officers. State His.
toric Preservation Programs must be approved
by the Secretary of the Interior before the
States nominate historic properties to the N a.
tional Register.
In addition to nominating historic properties
to the National Register, the State Historic
Preservation Officer prepares and implements a
comprehensive Statewide Historic Preservation
Plan, administers the State program of Federal
assistance for historic preservation within the
State, conducts a statewide survey of historic
properties, and cooperates with Federal, State
and local officials.and others to assure that
historic properties are taken into consideration
at all levels of planning and development. The
State Historic Preservation Officer also provides
public information, education and training, and
i
M
I�
echnical assistance relating to the Federal and
hate Historic Preservation Programs.
Local Government Activities. The State
fistoric Preservation Officer also assists local
; overnments in becoming certified to participate
n the Federal Historic Preservation Program,
ncluding the process for nominating properties
o the National Register.
Criteria for Evaluation
The National Register's standards for evaluat-
ng the significance of properties were developed
o recognize the accomplishments of all peoples
vho have made a contribution to our country's
iistory and heritage. The criteria are designed
o guide State and local governments, Federal
Lgencies, and others in evaluating potential en-
ries in the National Register.
', riteria for Evaluation
The quality of significance in American
iistory, architecture, archeology, engineering
ind culture is present in districts, sites, build -
ngs, structures, and objects that possess inte-
;rity of location, design, setting, materials,
vorkmanship, feeling, and association and:
L. that are associated with events that have
made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of our history; or
�. that are associated with the lives of persons
significant in our past; or -
that embody the distinctive characteristics of
a type, period, or method of construction, or
that represent the work of a master, or that
possess high artistic values, or that represent
a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction;
or
1. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield,
information important in prehistory or
history.
Criteria considerations: Ordinarily cemeteries,
)irthplaces, or graves of historical figures, prop -
!rties owned by religious' institutions or used.for
-eligious purposes, structures that have been
noved from their original locations, recon.
tructed historic buildings, properties primarily
ommemorative in nature, and properties that
Lave achieved significance within the past 50
ears shall not be considered eligible for the Na-
ional Register. However, such properties will
r�
qualify if they are integral parts of districts
that do meet the criteria or if they fall within
the following categories:
a. a religious property deriving primary signifi.
cance from architectural or artistic distinc.
tion or historical importance; or
b. a building or structure removed from its
original location but which is significant
primarily for architectural value, or which is
the..surviving structure most importantly
associated with a historic person or event; or
c. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of
outstanding importance if there is no other
appropriate site or building directly associated
with his productive life; or
d. a cemetery that derives its primary signifi.
cane from graves of persons of transcendent
importance, from. age, from distinctive design
features, or from association with historic
events; or
e. a reconstructed building when accurately ex-
ecuted in a suitable environment and pre-
sented in a dignified manner as part of a
restoration master plan, and when no other
building or structure with the same associa-
tion has survived; or
f. a property primarily commemorative in in-
tent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic
value has invested it with its own historical
significance; or -
g. a property achieving significance within the
past 50 years if it is of exceptional impor-
tance.
Information on documentation of properties
and use of the Criteria for Evaluation may be
obtained by writing: National Register of
Historic Places, National Park Service, U.S.
Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
20240.
Winterport Historic District, Winterport, ME
(Walter Smalling, Jr.)
Nominations to the National
Register
State Nominations. State nominations are
submitted to the National Park Service by State
Historic Preservation Officers. Ordinarily, Na-
tional Register forms to nominate properties are
prepared by local citizens or by the staff of the
State Historic Preservation Officer. These nomi-
nation forms are then submitted to a. State
review board, composed of professionals in the
fields of American history, architectural history,
architecture,• prehistoric and historic archeology,
and other related disciplines and may include
citizen members. This review board makes a
recommendation to the State Historic Preserva-
tion Officer either to approve the nomination if
in the board's opinion it meets the National
Register criteria or to disapprove the nomina.
tion if it does not.
During the time the proposed nomination is
reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Of.
ficer, property owners and local authorities are
notified. All property owners are given the op-
portunity to comment on the nomination and
owners of private property are given an oppor-
tunity to concur in or object to the nomination..
If the owner of a private property or the major-
ity of such owners for a property or district with
multiple owners object to the nomination, the
State Historic Preservation Officer forwards the
nomination to the National Park Service only
for a determination about whether the property
is eligible for listing. If a majority of owners do
not object, a State Historic Preservation Officer
may approve the nomination and forward it to
the National Park Service to be considered for
listing. If the nomination is approved by the Na.
tional Park Service, the property is officially
entered in the National Register.
Further information on the procedures to
nominate properties to the National Register
and the preservation program within your State
may be obtained by contacting the appropriate
State Historic Preservation Officer listed at the
end of this leaflet.
Federal Nominations. Nominations to the
National Register for Federal properties are
submitted to the National Park Sery ice through
Federal Preservation Officers appointed by the
agency heads. Federal agencies prepare National
Register nominations, notify local officials and
provide the State Historic Preservation OfT-icer
Butler County Courthouse, Butler. ON'Pat
Brown).
an opportunity to comment prior to submitriag
nominations to the National Park Service, The
Federal Preservation Officer approves each
nomination and forwards it to the National
Park Service for final consideration. If the
nomination is approved by the National Park
Service, the property is officially entered in the
National Register.
Information on Federal nominations to the
National Register and other preservation pro -
grams of Federal agencies may be obtained from
the Federal Preservation Officer for each agen-
cy. A list of Federal Preservation Officers is at
the end of this leaflet.
Nominations by persons and local govern -
rnents. The National Park Service may accept a
nomination directly from any person or local
government for inclusion of a property in the
National Register if the property is located in a
State where there.is no State Historic Preserva-
tion Program approved by the National Park
Service.
Appeals. Any person or local government
may appeal to the National Park Service the
nomination or listing, of any historir.property in
the National Re;,,is!er TIT,esls for norn;na.tions
In
0
0
0
77
'1
IN
nay also be made to the National Park Service
f a State or Federal agency fails or refuses to
lominate a property. Procedures for appeals are
'ound in the National Register regulations in 36
:FR 60.
Publications
A list of properties entered annually in the
national Register is published in the Federal
Register. These annual lists and early editions
If hardcover volumes of The National Register
If Historic Places (1976, volumes I and m are
mailable from the Superintendent of Docu-
nents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash -
ngton DC 20402. Earlier out-of-print volumes
should be available in major libraries.
Federal regulations for the National Register
If Historic Places can be found in the Code of
Federal Regulations under 36 CFR 60 (National
legister nomination procedures), 36 CFR 63
determination of eligibility procedures), and 36
'.FR 67 (certifications of significance and reha-
)ilitation for Federal tax purposes).
Additional Information
For more information about the National
legister, contact the National Park Service,
J.S. Department of the Interior, Washington,
).C. 20240, or any of the following National
?ark Service Regional Offices:
Alaska Regional Office
lational Park Service
.520 Gambell Street
Anchorage, AK 99503
Kid-Atlantic Regional Office
1ational Park Service
L43 South Third Street
?hiladelphia, PA 19106
southeast Regional Office
national Park Service
75 Spring Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Etocky Mountain Regional Office
Vational Park Service
?.O. Box 25287
)enver Federal Center
)enver, CO 80225
Western Regional Office
stational Park Service
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
State Historic Preservation
Officers and Federal
Preservation Officers
State Historic Preservation Officers
Alabama: Executive Director. Alabama Historical Commission. T25 Morroe St.
Montgomery, AL 36104 Alaska: Chief of History and Archeoioa. Department
of Natural Resources. 619 Warehouse Ave. Suite 210. Anch oraltv. AK rv501
American Samoa: Territorial Historic Preservation Officer. Department of
Public Works, Government of American Samoa. Pago Pago. American Samoa
96799 AAzoaa: Chief. Office of Historic Preservation. Arizona State Parka.
1888 West Adams, Phoenix. AZ 85007 Arkansu: Director. Arkansas Historic
Preservation Program. Suite 600. Continental Building. Markham and Main
Se. Little Rock, AR 72201 California: Office of Historic Preservation, Califor•
nice Department of Parks k Recreation. P.O. Box 2390. Sacramento. CA 95811
Coloradot State Historic Preservation Officer. Colorado Heritage Center, 1300
Broadway. Denver, CO 80203 Connecticut: Director, Connecticut Historical
Commission. 59 South Prospect St. Hartford. CT 06106 Delaware: Director.
Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs. Hall or Records. Dover. DE 19901
District of Columbla: Director, Department of Consumer and Regulatory Af-
fair, 614 H St. NW, Washington. D.C. 20001 noridc Director. Division of
Archives. History and Record Management. Department of State. The Capitol.
Tallahasm. FL 32304 Georgia Chief. Historic Preservation Section, Depart•
meat of Natural Resources. 270 Washington Su SW. Room 703•C. Atlamts GA
30334 Guam: Director, Department of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 2950.
Agana, GQ 96910 Hawaih State Historic Preservation Officer, Department of
Land amd Natural Resoums, P.O. Box 921. Honolulu. HI 96808 Idaho: Historic
Pre arvation Coordinator. Idaho Historical Society, 610 North Julia Davis Dr.
Boise, ID 93706 I inoia Director. Department of Conservation, State Office
Building, 40D South Spring St. Springfield. IL 62706 Indiana Director. Depart•
ment of Natural Resources, 608 State ice Balding. Indianapolis. IN; 462(4
Iowa Director. Iowa State Historical Department. Division of Histom Presena•
tion. East 12th and Grand Avenue. Da Moinm IA 50'519 Kanaaa Executive
Dimon. Kansas Sum Historical Societe. 120 scan 1(th St. Topeka. KS 66612
Kentucky: Sate Historical Preservation Officer and Director. Kentucky
Heritage Council. Capitol Plana Tower. Frankfort. KY 40601 Louisiana: Asst.
tent Secretary. Office of Program Detviupment. P 0. Box 4424'. Baton Rouge.
LA 0804 Maine. Director. Maine H:toric Prvsevtation Commission. 55 Capno:
St. Augusta. ME 04330 Maryland: State Historic Preservation Officer.
Maryland Historic Trust. 21 State Circle. Annapolis. \ID 21401 Massachusetts:
Executive Director. Massachusetts Historical Commission, 294 Washington St.
Boston. MA 02108 Michigan: Director. Michigan History Division. Department
of State, Lansing, MI 48918 Minnesota: Director. Minnesota Historical Society.
690 Cedar St. St. Paul. MN 55101 Mississippi: Director, State of Mississippi.
Department of Archives and History. P.O. Box 5'1. Jackson. MS 39205
Missouri• Sum Historic Preservation Officer. State Department of Natural
R.ewurces. P.O. Box 176. Jefferson C:ry•. MO 65101 Montana Direner.
Montana Historical Society. 225 North Roberti S:. Vtterans Memorial Bu:id:np.
Helms. ?1759601 Nebraska: Director. The Nebrasxa State H:etoncs. Socu•.y.
1500 R St. Lincoln. -NE 6550E Nevada: State Hutorc Preservacion Offrer. Div%.
Sion of Historic Preservation and Archeoiogy. Capitol Complex. Carson C7re. NV
89710 New Hampshire: Department Commissioner. Depament of Resources and Economic
Development. P.O. Box 856. Concord. NH 03301 Now Jersey. Commissioner.
Department of Environmental Protection. P 0. Box 1390. Trenton. NJ
08625 New Mexitu: State Hisv,nr Preserra ion OtTeer. New Mexiro H:roam
Preservation Division. Office of Cultural Affairs. 1':aa Rivvrs. Reom 102. 22S E
Palace Ave. Santa Fe. NM 5-503 New fork: Cnr„nasnoner. Parka and Rvereo
tion, Agency Budding -1. Empire State PSaza. Alban). NY 1"136 North
Carolina: Director. Division 4.4 vao ei and History. Dvpanmm of Caturai
Resources. 109 East Jones St. Raleien. NC 1 "':1 North Dakota: Supenn:Pm
dent. State Historical Soc:e:y d Nor.r. Dais :aa. Ubr ^y Memural Bu::amc.
Bismarck. ND 56501 Northern Mariana Islands: Hi.tnrc Preser)at: •n
c o Department of Cnmmunm and Cultura: Affair:. Cnmm••rwra: :r. td N •r:- rn
Mariana Isis -ids. Saipan. Mariana lxiands 56960 Ohio: Diremor. The Ohto
Historical Society, Interstate 71 at 15th Ave. Columbus. OH 43211 Oklahoma:
State Historic Preservation Officer, Oklahoma Historical Society. Historical
Building, Oklahoma City. OK 73105 Oregon: State Parke Superintendent. 525
Trade St, SE. Salem. OR 97310 Pennsylvania: Stan Historic Preservation Of.
ficer. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. P.O. Box 1206. Her.
risburg, PA 17, 120 Commonwealth of Puerto Rim; Office of Cultural Affairs.
La Fortalara. San Juan. PR 00905 Rhode Island: Director. Rhode Island
Department of Community Affairs, 150 Washington St. Providence. Its 02903
South Carolina: Director, State Archives Department, 1430 Senate St. Colum•
bia. SC 29211 South Dakota State Hisuinc Preservation Officer. Historical
Preservation Center. University of South Dakota. Alums Souse. Vermillion. SO
57069 Tanneaaea Executive Director, Tennessee Historical Commission. 4721
Trou side Dr. Nashville. TN 37219 Texas: Exacuua Director, Texas Sum
Historical Commission, P.O. Box 12276. Capital Station, Austin. TX TBTI1
Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. Historic Preservation Officer. Land
Resources Branch. Department of Resources At Development, TTPL Saipan.
Mariana Islands 96950 Utah: State Historic Preservation Officer, Utah
Historical Society, 300 Rio Grande. Salt Lake City. LT 84101 Vermont: Dim.
tar. Vermont Division fm Historic prean"Lion. Pavilion Office Building, Mon`
poll". VT 08602 V4ginfa. Executive Director, Virginia Historic Landmarks
Commission, 221 Governor St, Richmond. VA 23219 Virgin Islatidw Planning
Director, Virgin Islands Planning Board. Charlaw Amalie. St. Thomas. VI
00801 Washingtam State Historic Preservation Officer. 111 Wan 21st Ave,
RL31. Olympia, WA 98504 Will Virginia: Catuddiaioner. Department of
Culture and Hiumy. State Capitol Comples, Chalenon. WV 28304 Wisconsin:
Director. State Historinl Society of Wiseonstn 816 State St. Madison, K7 53708
Wyoming: Acting Historic Preservation Offlow. Wyoming Racrastion Commis.
son. 604 Eat ,
at 2511 SL But 309. Cheyenne, WY 62001 National Trust for
Historic Pueservatiom President. National Trust for Historic Reservation..
1785 Mass efi mis Ave. NW. Washington, D.C. 20036
Federal Preeenatlon.Officers
Director. Office of Rural Development Poicy,.Depst meet of Agriculture.
Room 4141. South Building. 20250 Deputy Director for Program Dev410P-
ideal. Office of Administrative SaM ns. Department of Commerce 20230 Dirac-
tar, Enavironnnestal Policy. Department of Defense. Office of the Assistant
Seeranry of Defense tManpower. Reserve Affairs and Logistini 20301 Assistant
Secretary for Environment. Department of Energy. Room 46084. Forrestal
Building. 3000 Independence Aw. SW. 20588 Deputy Diraoter, Office of En
virvammtal Affair, Department of Health and Human Services Room 537F,
200 Independence Ave. SW. 20201 Assistant Secretary for Community Plan
ning and D"opment. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Room 7100.20410 Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
Department of the Interior 20240 Assistant Director. Cultural Resources
Department of the Interior 20240 Chief.
Mmagend pi niting Park, Service. ties Ma,
Policy and Planniog Group, Facilities Management Section. property.
Management and Procurement Staff. Justice Management Division. Department
of Justice 20530 Assistant Secretary of State for Administration. Depart-
ment of Sea 20320 OffWe of Economics. Eavironmental Division, Depart.
men, of Transportitiom Room 10223, 20590 Assistant Director Mnviron
mental Prograeisk Office of Administrative Programs. Department of the
Treasury 20220
Independent Agencies
Environmental Protection Specialist. Office of Environmental Review
nA.104). En immmenai Protection Aieac;: 20460 Federal Communications
Commission. 70554 Director of Historic Preservation. General Senfices Ad.
ministration 20405 Section of Energy and Environment. Internat. Com-
merce Commission 20423 Facilities Division. NASA Hq. 0%XB•9, 20546 Chief.
Historic. Preservation Branch. Nations; Capital Planning Commission. 1325
Business Administration. n. 1441 L St. 2";6 Special iFAwiatat.nt W the Small
Secretary. Smithsonian Institution. 20560 Director. Office of Red Estate.
U.S. Portal Service.. 20260 Office of Cl n truetlon. Vice eranaAdministration.
611 Vermont Ave..%W 20420 Senior Staff Member for Historic Preserve•
tlon. Urban Affairs and !end Use. Council on Environmental Quality, 772
Jackson PI. NW 20096 Wand Environmental Economist. Regional Im•
pact Analysis Senior. Nuclear Rtgulaton- Commission. 20555 Office Of
Natural Resources. Tennessee t'►iley Authority. 219 Lawn Street Building,
Norris. TN 37902 international Boundary and Water Commission. C.S. and
Ntexico.4110 Rin Bravo. 200 IBWC Budding, El Paw. TX 79902
For Bale 8y-the Xuteerin%endeut of Uucuineuta.
U.& Ooverament Printing Office Washittctuu. U.C. 2U402
Corer: ofd Pan office, St. Laois. MO IArreago Pham,: Piedmont Charcoal
RiLu. Hilliard uicintty. WY (Jerk E. Boucher, HABS): Cumbns and roltec
Samit Railroad, betwen Antonin. CO and Chants. NU 'Ernest W. Robert):
Bad Smoot Howe. Pr000.. UT toeorge R. Adams): Frederick Historic District.
Frederick. kfD tid Low): Chumpr•Frement 1 Amheologied Site. Omaha
oicatay, NE webmsko State Historical Satisfy'.
*U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1983 - 418.731
�r
1
i
I�
�I
B. WHAT PROPERTIES ARE HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT?
There are two types of historic properties in San Luis Obispo:
Individual buildings that have significant historic or architectural value are
called "Historical Resources."
Buildings in older neighborhoods that contribute to the character of that
neighborhood are called "contributing" structures.
Owners of these properties may be eligible for benefits and services described in
the next section. Additional information about historic properties is presented
below.
1. Historical Resources
In 1981 a citizens committee, appointed by the City Council, surveyed the older
buildings in town -- those built before 1941. After studying the history and
architecture of these buildings, the City Council approved a listing of properties
that are considered Historical Resources. There are five classes of resources. The
definition of each class and the "master list" of historical resources are included
in Appendix B of these guidelines.
The city is continuing to study the history of its older neighborhoods, so more
historic sites may be added to the list. Check with the Community Development
Department for the most up -to -date listing. Also, property owners may conduct their
own research and ask the City Council to add their property to the list. More
information about this procedure is included in Appendix C.
1. Historical Preservation Districts
In 1987, the City Council created three Historical Preservation Districts. The N
purpose of the districts is to identify older parts of San Luis Obispo that exhibit
an important part of our community's history. The districts are shown on Figure #1
and include the downtown business district and parts of the older residential
neighborhoods that surround it.
Buildings within each district have been classified as "contributing" or
"non- contributing." . Contributing buildings add to the historic character of the
neighborhood. Non - contributing buildings are typically newer structures that do not
support the prevailing historic character of the area.
The boundaries of historic districts can change over time. Check with the Community
Development Department for the most up -to -date map. Citizens may ask the City
Council to create new historical districts or change the boundaries of existing
ones. Information about this procedure is included in Appendix E.
I
I
2
011 rmm +0400
W. 044
Inited States Department of the Interior
lational Park Service
4ational Register of Historic Places
3egistration Form
cus as mit+mra
his form Is for use In nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Gutdel(nes
w Completing National Reg/ster forms (National Register Bulletin tlg. Complete each Rem by marking' ' in the appropriate box or by entering
ie requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "WA' for "not apprreable:" For functions. styles, materials,
and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For add'itbnal space use continuation sheets
=arm 10.900at. Tvoe all entries.
wvnership of Prol
] private
public -local
] public -State
] pubrro•Federai
t,,ategory of P
X❑ building(s)
❑ district
❑ site
❑ structure
❑ object
lame of related multiple property listing:
I/A
Number of Resources within Property
Contributing Noncontributing
3 t buildings
sites
I structures
objects
Total
Number of contributing resources previously
listed in the National Register 0
State/Federal Agency Certification (OHP use Only)
As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this
❑ nomination ❑ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the
National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFA Part 60.
In my opinion, the property ❑ meets ❑ does not meet the National Register criteria. ❑ See continuation sheet
Signature of certifying official
State or Federal agerwy and bureau
Date
In my opinion, the property 10 meets ❑ does not most the National Register criteria U See continuation starer
Signature of commenting or other official
State or Federal agency em
] entered in the National Register.
F1 See continuation sheet.
]determined eligible for the National
Register. ❑ See continuation, sheet.
]determined not eligible for the
National Register.
] removed from the National Register.
] other, (explain:)
Date
I. -.- _. . ..1--
Ci
Ristoric Functions (enter categories Uwn
Architectural classification
(enter categories from instructions)
Late Victorian Itelianate
n
Current Functions (enter categories from instructions)
(enter categories from
foundation concrete
„GIs rood j)
roof
other �I
Describe present and historic physical appearance- ame as
Except for the maturation of the
80trree , the Jack House lofourmuch the
southwestiotd the
whetj�
it was finished in the early
business center of San Luis Obispo on the northwest side of Marsh Street. The house is e
two -story wood, balloon - framed, single residence, sitting on a raised concrete full m
over the center e ntrance section
The overall shape is rectangular with rooms located off a central t
extends across the front of the house with a balustrade ov e
only. The tall, thin windows are double hung and evenlevesaaee decorated r*
paired Th
�
hip roof has a balustrade with a decorative vent. windows are found
brackets, medallion blocks, and a decorative frieze. Single -story bay windowsn the reari�
on each side with alimi lar design snathenowehas aneelevatortattaehed to it (1,970). The
on the west side. ical of the era.
exterior sheeting is shiplap redwood, typ
are located to the north and northwest of A utility
h•room`n
The carriage house and washroom
structures are assumed to have been built at the same time as thTheseswere built by the
between and a.gazebo is in the eastern corner of the property. I�
city in 1980.
'
The driveway enters the property from Marsh Street and continues straight back to the reb,house
o the right
of the lot where it makes a 90- degree turn t and surroundingogroundsraregcovel�
which is entered from the northwest side. The driveway
with many mature trees planted by Nellie Jack who was particularly fond of trees and exo.
plants. (�
4®
[] See continuation sheet Is
------ - - - - -- -- - - - -
pin — in relation -to other proper
irtifying official has considered the significance of this roperty
Q nationally Q statewide Q focally
1plicable National Register Criteria
Q A
xQ B
Q C
Q D
iteria Considerations (Exceptions)
Q A
Q S
Q C
Q D Q E Q F Q a
•eas of Significance (enter categories from instructions)
2mmerce
Period of Significance
1881 -1916
Cultural Affiliation
n
Significant Dates
ignificant Person ArchitectlBuiider
sek, Robert Edgar Evans.. William
tate significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. .
he Jack House was the residence of Robert Edgar and Nellie Hollister Jack. He was a
rominent land developer, banker, and rancher in Central California from the 1870's until
is death in 1916.
.E.. Jac, was born In Maine and came to California in 1868. He started ranching the
ol.lowing year by buying half ot'Reneho Cholame from W.M.'Hollister. In 1870, he married
ellie, the niece of M.N., and the following year they moved to the City of San Luis
bispo. When her uncle died in 1874, Jack bought the remainder of the ranch from his
idow. The ranch's Circle C brand is the oldest brand registered with the State of
alifornia that is still .in regular use.
t this time, the area was mainly ranching, both sheep and cattle. R.E. Jack brought new
reeds and breeding methods to California. As one of the largest sheepfarmers, he employed
undreds of Basque sheepherders and had numerous connections along the 1200 mile sheep
razing routes which ran from San Bernadino in the south, to Glenn and Tehama counties in
he north as well as east of the Sierras.
he drought of the 1860's had encouraged diversification into grains, dairy, fruit trees.
nd vegetable production. However. transportation to markets north and south was generally
low (ship) and expensive (road). The West Coast had just been linked by the Trans -
ontinental Railroad to the east and the Southern Pacific Line extended south to Soledad
n 1873. Everyone expected it to be extended through San Luis Obispo to link Los Angeles.
I.E. Jack was ready for the railroad.
lthough wool growing was listed as his occupation as late as 1883. R.E. Jack was already
n established banker by that time. In the early 1870's. he was the cashier of the.
irst National Bank, which was later the Bank of San Luis Obispo. He was a principal in
he banks of Paso Robles, Santa Maria and Lompoc.
x❑ See continuation sheet
We POPM to ow
a•n
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Section number 8 Page 8.1
11
By 1886, the rails had reached Templeton and the local business elite in San Luis Obispo
were concerned that it continue through-their-town. ---To-accomplish this, the Board of
Trade (Chamber of Commerce) was established with. R.E. Jack as the Treasurer. He was
already the Treasurer of the Nest Coast Land Company which was selling land adjacent to
the railroad in Templeton. He was also the Secretary and Co- Treasurer of the California
Southern Hotel Col, which had built the Ramona Hotel in anticipation of the railroad
coming to San Luis Obispo. To get hotel guests from the narrow gauge Pacific Railroad.
Jack bought the City's first horse -drawn rail trolley. Consequently, he was most anxidus
for the Southern Pacific to arrive in San Luis Obispo.
In 1887, the Southern Pacific asked Jack, Isaac Goldtree, and J.P. Andrews to procure
the right -of -way for the railroad through the City of San Luis Obispo. Prominent citizens
were enlisted for this job since the railroad expected landowners along the proposed rou
to give up their lend for the `good of all" citizens in the community. Mr. Jack also
represented the City as its Mayor from 1890 to 1893.
This pattern of land sales and hotel buildings continued south to Los Olivos and Lompoc.
However, much before the land boom was over, R.E. Jack was a millionaire. The San
Francisco Examiner listed him as the richest taxpayer in the County in 1890.
Nellie Jack was known for her love of reading and was a founding member of the library
in 1892 which eventually became the City Library in 1898. She hosted many lawn parties
at her house to raise funds for the library. For a time, the Andrews Building was used
to house the collection until the Carnegie Library was finished in 1905.
1
Major Bibliographical References -
inn, J.M., History _of_ the _State _of_California. (Santa Cruz. San Benito. Monterey, and
n Luis Obispo ). a
Chapmn Publishing Co., Chicago. 1903.
cholson, Loren, Rails _Across_ the _Ranchos. Valley Publishers, Fresno, 1980.
orke, Mrs. Yda Addis. A Memorial and Biographieai HistorY_of_Santa— Barbara__San Luis
ispo_and_Ventura Counties. Lewis Publishing Co.,. Chicago. 1891.
vious documentation on file (NPS):
preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67)
has been requested
previously listed in the National Register
previously determined eligible by the National Register
designated a National Historic Landmark
recorded by Historic American Buildings
Survey N
recorded by Historic American Engineering
Record e
face: (2) California Polytechnic State Universit
❑ See continuation sheet
Primary location of additional data:
❑ State historic preservation office
❑ Other State agency
❑ Federal agency
❑)( Local government
0 University
❑ Other
Specify repository:
(1) San Luis Obispo County Recorder's
y - Robert E. Kennedy Library
reage of property -84
1.
M References
I I _.1 I I I. f I i i I I i I I I i � `B L_1J I.:1 I i l 1 1
Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing
W I I I I 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 01_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
❑ See continuation sheet
foal Boundary Description
Q See continuation sheet
,undary Justification
iese City lots have always been occupied by the Jack House and its out- buildings.
❑ See continuation sheet
Form Prepared By
.meltitie Leo W Pinard II Member
ganization SLO Cultural Heritage Committee date December 5 1984
•eet& number 714 Suchon Street telephone (805) 544 -4566
yortown San Luis Obispo state California' Zipeode 93401
re rew +o�oo.
WW
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Section number 10 Page 10.1
VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION:
{ ^1 owa kvwr w �oHaou .
Commencing at a point on the southerly line of Higuera Street South 53' 7' West, I
One Hundred and Eighty -Three feet, six inches (183 -6/12 feet) from the Southwest
corner of Higuera and Nipomo Streets and running thence South 53'7' West on the South
line of Higuera Street Two Hundred and Twenty -Five (225) feet, thence South 36'53' Eas10
to the line of Marsh Street; thence, Northeasterly along the line of Marsh Street. Two
Hundred and Twenty -Five (225) feet; thence, at right angles Northwesterly to Higuera
Street and the point of beginning and being all that portion of Block 62 of the City of '
San Luis Obispo, occupied as a residence of R.E. Jack and wife. and extending from Hig
Street to Marsh Street according to two deeds: One made by H.M. Warden to Nellie
Hollister Jack, dated August 9, 1875; and the other made by Thomas Higuera and others
on February 11,•1876, to R. Edgar Jack, and both of record in the Recorders Office of
San Luis Obispo County. State of California.
Excepting therefrom that portion thereof conveyed to Manuel F. Lima, at ux, by deed
dated September 29, 1922, and recorded October 2. 1922, in Book 157, Page 410 of Deeds
Also, excepting therefrom, that portion thereof conveyed by deed dated November 22, 191
in Book 188, Page 449 of Deeds to Nicholas F. Schlicht,
G
0
i
• w �
VIM • ��.
y r „ I l Jk� ♦.
of r • � j
• � ....a k t+ y �Y'i� Y k �l
- 3 j
• 1• •• +
`� � n,�yia� ti�l •. ��: '�itit'V t%Y.y�'•.Y��T�•'9 `'+i`�7 •'Y� il�.�rV r7xY _v�� J
1'.42 C 1 ... P,,✓"� .'y1t�- � r�
.:,i• air >. .� -;':.
w�' t Arl�� cp f r r 1 r f`K h i `.'1 Y + i 1�. {�•,'•+,
a
0
Z
�W
V
W
U)
Z
W
0
cc
C)
/W
V ^/
O
2
U
Q
g �o• y8E�8�o��g' 3q�za�LO�F °3..��gi$���o����Q9 &�°����
$ ��k& as' �.2 1�'U �11��.�L�1a� &a��
:}��SC�ye � Y
2 y C6 vE, ^ a uZ a 91 �dtJ
C '
$a
111111 g=
=Mail-ll cc lit s :N.;YV pt�aoO 0���__v3 �aCQ O.. 4 A4 A��j I mpp� D_H��p v�n�O O W N
.. N N N N N N V N N N T T T T M t T T T Y Y Y
N
J
U
N
W
W
F
N
N
Q
Q
2
i or
FILE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
'ARTMEW OF PARKS AND RECREATION
r orflce iox 2M
LVA MO, CAMMA Mitt
L6) 445 -8006
Administrative Officer
City of San. Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
J
1
a,muND a. /IOwN JR.
December 15, 1981
•
Myron Angel House
714 Buchon Street
San Luis Obispo
The above property will be considered by the State Historical Resources Commission
for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register
is the Federal Government's official list of historic buildings and other cultural
resources, worthy of preservation. Listing in the National Register provides
recognition and assists in preserving our Nation's heritage.. Enclosed is a copy
of the criteria under which properties are evaluated.
Listing in the National Register provides the following benefits to historic
properties:
-- Consideration in the planning for federally assisted projects. Section 106
of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provides that the Advisory
council on Historic Preservation be given an opportunity to comment on projects
affecting such Iroperties.
-- Eligibility for Federal tax benefits. If a property is listed in the National
Register, certain tax provisions may apply. The Tax Reform Act of 1976, as
amended by the Revenue Act of 1978 and the Tax Treatment Extension Act of 19802
and the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, contain provisions intended to
encourage the preservation of depreciable historic structures by allowing favorab:
tax treatments for rehabilitation, and to discourage destruction of historic
buildings by eliminating certain Federal tax provisions for demolition of historic
structures. Beginning January 1, 1982, the Economic Recovery Tax Act replaces
the rehabilitation tax incentives available under prior law with a 25% investment
tax credit for rehabilitations of certain historic commercial, industrial and
residential rental buildings. This can be combined with a 15 -year cost recovery
period for the adjusted basis of the historic building. Historic buildings
with certified rehabilitations receive additional tax savings because they are
exempt from any requirement to reduce the basis of the building by the amount
of credit. The Tax Treatment Extension Act of 1980 includes provisions regarding
charitable contributions for conservation purposes of partial interests in
historically important land areas or structures.
-- Consideration of historic values in the decision to issue a surface coal
mining permit where coal is located, in accord with the Surface Mining and
Control Act of 1977.
Qualification for Federal Grants for historic preservation when funds are
available.
Page 2
Owners of private properties nominated to the National Register of Historic PlaceiPE
must be given an opportunity to concur in or object to listing in accord with the
National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 1980 and Federal regulations
36 CFR Part 60. Any owner or partial owner of private property who chooses to obj�
to listing is required to submit to the State Historic Preservation Officer a notari:
statement certifying that the party is the sole or partial owner of the private
property, as appropriate, and objects to the listing. For a single privately own
��
property with one owner, the property will not be listed if the owner objects. l
nominations with multiple ownership of a single property, the property will not be
listed if a majority of the owners objects. In the case of a district nomination
the district will not be listed if a majority of the owners objects to listing. IM
Each owner or partial owner of private property has one vote regardless of how many
properties or what part of one property that party owns. If the property or distr C.t
cannot be listed because the owner or a majority of owners objects prior to submis
of a nomination by the State, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall submit
nomination to the Keeper of the National Register for a determination of the
eligibility of the property or district for inclusion in the National Register .
the property is then determined eligible for listing, although not formally liste
Federal agencies will be required to allow the Advisory Council on Historic Preserva-
tion an opportunity to comment before the agency may fund, license, or assist a
project which will affect the property. If an owner chooses to object to the list
of property, the notarized objection must be submitted to Dr. Knox Mellon, State
Historic Preservation Officer, Office of historic Preservation, Post Office Box 2 90
Sacramento, CA 95811, fifteen (15) days before the State historical Resources Comm
sion considers this application; it will be considered by the Commission on
February 5. 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in The Great Hall,
C. Frederick Kohl Mansion, 2750 Adeline Drive, Burlingame, California
If you wish to comment on whether th
Register, please send your comments t
before the State Historical Resources
of the application has been included
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Knox Mellon •
State Historic Preservation Officer
Office of Historic Preservation
enclosure
DPR 548B (12/81)
Local Government - Individual
e property should be nominated to the Nation
o the above address. Comments must be receiv
Commission considers this nomination. A cop
for your review.
Cons
APPENDIX H
Resolution No. 6158 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBIPSPO
ADOPTING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the City Council established the Cultural Heritage Committec (CHC) as a
continuing special purpose advisory body; and
WHEREAS, the CHC is responsible for the administration of the city's historical
preservation program; and
WHEREAS, The CHC and the City Council want to establish benifit programs and provide
assistance that encourages people to undertake preservation activities; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the Historical Preservation Guidelines
submitted by the CHC and has recommended that they be adopted.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
1. The Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" as
amended, are hereby adopted.
2. The Community Development Department shall publish these guidelines and make them
available to the public.
3. Resolution No 6097 (1986 Series) is hereby recinded.
On Motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Dovey
►nd on the following role call votc:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro —Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember Rappa and Mayor Dunin
R 6158
�J
Resolution No. 6158 (1987 Series)
Page 2
the foregoing
1987.
as passed and ado
Mayor Pro- Tent'Robert
ATTEST:
Citk Clerk Pamela Vogt
APPROVED:
V?�
City Administrative Officer
city Atco ey /
Community Development Director
J
this Ord day of February
C. BENEFITS AND SERVICES OFFERED BY THE CITY
San Luis Obispo depends on the interest and voluntary actions of its citizens to
make this historical preservation program work. To encourage participation, the
city offers the following programs and services.
1. Rehabilitation Assistance Program
The city has created a financial assistance program to help property owners with the
cost of restoring historic residential buildings. Details of this program -- who is
eligible, terms of assistance, application procedures -- are included in Appendix F.
2. Alternative Building Code
Anyone who wants to modify a historic building may use provisions of the city's
Historic Bnildi g_ ode which allows alternative ways of meeting standard code
requirements. The historic code might make it easier to restore old buildings that
were constructed long before San Luis Obispo adopted building regulations. For
details about how provisions of the historic code might apply to your project,
contact the Building Division in the Community Development Department
(805 -549- 7180). Copies of the code can be purchased from the department.
3. Inspection Services I
If you own a historic building and want to know what it would take to improve it
to bring it up to code -- the city can help. The Building Division will inspect
your building free of charge and will identify major improvements needed to meet
code.
4. Local Landmark Program
Owners of Historic Resources can ask the city for official recognition of their
efforts to preserve important structures. The city will provide a certificate
suitable for framing and, if desired by the owner, a permanent historical marker to
be installed on the building site. For more information, contact the Community
Development Department.
5. Preservation Library
The city is creating a library of information that can help people with restoration '
projects or with historical research. The library contains information about
historic resource properties and properties in historic districts. It includes some
old maps of the city and building permit records. Over time, publications that will
be added to the library include:
4
CD
How- to -do -it books on restoration..
Catalogs of available building materials and architectural accessories.
Periodicals or other publications that describe preservation efforts.
A referral list of people who have undertaken restoration projects and are
willing to share their experience.
The preservation library is located in the Community Development Department on the
ground floor of City Hall, 990 Palm Street. The department is open weekdays, 8 to
5,Monday through Friday.
6. Preservation Counseling
The Cultural Heritage Committee will meet with people who want to pursue
preservation projects. The CHC can provide advice on:
How to restore older buildings (reconstruction techniques);
How to get information about building materials;
How to carry out historical research
How to take advantage of available state or federal grant programs or tax relief
programs.
How to prepare a National Register application. Some written information about
the National Register is included in Appendix G.
People interested in talking with the committee should contact the Community
Development Department.
The Cultural Heritage Committee also provides the following educational services
available to all citizens.
7. Summertime Walking Tours
CHC members conduct tours of the historic central business district and older
residential areas throughout the summer. For information about the tour schedule,
contact the Community Development Department.
S. Speakers Bureau
CHC members are available to make presentations to community groups interested in
historical preservation. Groups can arrange for a speaker by contacting the
Community Development Department at least three weeks before the proposed speaking
date.
5
I
D. PRINCIPLES OF HISTORICAL PRESERVATION
The preservation of historic buildings most often depends on the voluntary actions of individuals. However,
both individuals and the community at large have a stake in maintaining our town's heritage: The following
are principles that should help guide actions that change historic properties.
1. Chnngiug the Exterior of Historic Buildings
Changes to the outside of a historic building
should further promote its original architectural style and
character.
A building may reflect a combination of styles or might have been modified one or more d me a Paid
Changes to the outside of such a building should not introduce some new or conflicting that have
complement the prevailing architecture of the surrounding
area. Changes to parts of a building
been modified in the past should usually exhibit the buildings original architectural style.
2. New Construction Projects
The design of new accessory structures (such as storage sheds or garages) or minor structural additions
should complement the style of the historic building. New styles or the use of exterior building materials
foreign to the historic structure should generally be avoided.
New primary structures within Historical Preservation Districts should further promote the histooric character
of those areas. Careful attention to building form, bulk, scale, siting sand � landscaping However, moments of these
new buildings need not be designed in the same style of surrounding lenient a architectural
styles and building forms should be included in the new structure and it should comp
character of the area
The U.S. Department of Interior has published Standards for Historic Preservation along with guidelines for
applying them. People who are restoring older buildings may wish to review these guidelines' Cop ieessbcan be
ordered from the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. (The is
024016- 00105 -2.)
As information only, people who are restoring buildings included on the Master List of Historic Resources or
buildings designated as "contributing- properties within historic districts may wish to consider the following
standards published by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation
The Standards that follow were originally published in 1977 and revised in 1990 as part of Department of the
Interior regulations (36 CFR Part 67, Historic Preservation Certifications). They pertain to historic buildings
of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and the interior of
.. historic buildings. The Standards also encompass related landscape features and the buildings site and
environment as well as attached, adjacent or related new construction..
•
7
The Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation projects in a reasonable manner, taking into
consideration economic and technical feasibility.
1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to
the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or
alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a
false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from
other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right
shall be retained and preserved
S. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a
property shall be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture,
and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be
substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be
used The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means
possible.
8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved If such
resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that
characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with
the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be
unimpaired
3. Demolishing Historic buildings
The city promotes the long -term maintenance and restoration of designated Historical Resources and
buildings in historic Districts. The city wants to work with property owners to explore alternatives to
demolition, such as rehabilitation and reuse of the building, use of the alternative building code's provisions
o C
RESOLUTION NO. 6157(1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DEFINING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION GOALS AND ESTABLISHING THE
CULTURAL HERITAGE COMNIITTEE AS A CONTINUING SPECIAL PURPOSE
ADVISORY BODY.
WHEREAS, The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) was created in 1981 as a temporary
committee to complete an inventory of community historical resources and oversee the
development of a Historical Preservation Program; and
WHEREAS, the CHC completed an initial inventory of the community's historical,
architectural and cultural resources in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted resolution 5197 (1983 series) that establishes an
official listing of historical resources; and
WHEREAS, the CHC, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission, City Council,
city staff and the public have evaluated numerous alternatives for establishing a
Historical Preservation Program; and
WHEREAS, on October 7, 1986 the City Council adopted Resolution 6097 which
established preservation program guidelines and directed staff to prepare ordinances and
other materials needed to establish a preservation program; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to establish the CHC as a continuing special purpose
advisory body to help administer the program; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to set forth the goals of the city's historical
preservation program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
Section 1: Intent of Historical Preservation. It is in the public interest to
protect and preserve historical, architectural, and cultural resources including
monuments, sites, objects, structures, buildings and other designated areas.
Section 2: Historical Preservation Goals. The city's Historical Preservation
Program should:
R 6157
o �
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series)
Page 2
A. Foster civic and neighborhood pride and a sense of identity based on the
recognition and use of Historical Resources;
B. Promote the enjoyment and use of Historical Resources appropriate for the
education and recreation of the people of the city;
C. Encourage public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the city's past;
D. Safeguard the heritage of the city by providing for the preservation of Historical
Resources which represent significant elements of its history.
E. Protect property values and increase economic and financial benefits to the city
and its inhabitants;
F. Protect and enhance the city's attractions to residents and visitors;
G. Encourage architectural styles within Historical Preservation Districts which
reflect established architectural traditions.
H. Conserve valuable materials and energy resources by continuing to use and maintain
existing buildings.
Section 3: Cultural Heritage Committee (CHCI. The CHC is hereby established as a
continuing special purpose advisory body.
A. Membership. The CHC shall have 11 members. The members of the CHC shall include
a person knowledgeable in local history, a person with training or experience in
structural rehabilitation, and a person with knowledge of architecture (a minimum of
three people).
The membership shall include one city resident from each of the three Historical
Preservation Districts created by Ordinance No. 1086 (1987 Series).
At least eight members shall be residents of the City of San Luis Obispo.
B. Terms. The terms of committee members shall be two years. Terms of five
original members shall expire on March 31, 1988, and terms of six original members
shall expire on March 31, 1989. Terms shall expire thereafter on March 31st at
two -year intervals.
C. Functions and Duties. The CHC will:
(1) Collect, consolidate and make available information about Historical Resources
and Historical Resource Sites and promote, participate in, or sponsor education and
interpretive programs.
(2) Provide advice and guidance for the restoration, alteration, decoration,
landscaping or. maintenance of Historical Resources or properties within Historical
Preservation Districts.
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series)
Page 3
(3) Review the Inventory of Historical Resources and recommend to the City Council
any amendments.
(4) Assist property owners with the preparation of National Register applications for
for Historical Resource Sites.
(5) Help to administer benefit programs approved by the City Council that are
directed at preserving. Historical Resources or resources within Historical
Preservation Districts.
(6) Publish and maintain Historical Preservation Program Guidelines which present (a)
benefit programs sponsored by the city; (b) procedures for adding properties to the
Inventory of Historical Resources or for establishing a Historical District,- and
(c) other information concerning historical preservation.
(7) Review actions proposed by public agencies and provide information on how such
actions may affect designated or eligible properties within or adjacent to Historical
Districts.
(8) Cooperate with local, state, and federal agencies in the pursuit of historical
preservation.
(9) Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Bodies Handbook and
perform other duties as assigned by the City Council.
Section 4: Definitions. The following words and phrases shall have the following
meaning:
(1) Historical Preservation District. Any area which has been so designated under
Chapter 17.54 (Zoning Regulations).
(2) Historical .Resource or Historical Resource Site Any improvements, buildings,
sites, areas or objects of scientific, aesthetic, educational, cultural,
architectural or historical significance that have been designated by resolution of
the Council and included in the Inventory of Historical Resources.
Historical Resources or Historical Resource Sites are classified as follows:
Priority #1: Already placed on the National Register.
Priority #2: Determined eligible for the National Register.
Priority #3: Eligible for the National Register.
Priority #4: Potentially eligible for the National Register.
Priority #5: Not eligible for the National Register but significant at a local
level.
(3) Inventory of Historical Resources All properties listed by address in the
Completion Report (approved by City Council Resolution No. 5197, 1983 Series) and any
other properties subsequently added to this listing by resolution of the City
Council.
Section 5: Resolution No. 4660 (1981 Series), that established the temporary
Cultural Heritage Committee, is hereby rescinded.
Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series)
Page 4
On motion of. Councilwoman Doyey.. ;,seconded Councilman.. Settle, and on the
following .role call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle and Mayor Pro —Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of February ,
1987.
ATTEST:
_ 1
Ci y Clerk Pamela ges
APPROVED:
T'k-, \ e. `,,,
City Administrative Officer
City Attor ey
Community Development Director
. . i I
'IN
• o
RESOLUTION No. 6156 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE DETACHMENT OF 1.67 ACRES AT 2500
ROYAL WAY FROM THE CITY (DETACHMENT #2)
WHEREAS, on August 21, 1986, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the
detachment of this property from the city; and
WHEREAS, the property is not appropriate for urban development now or in the future;
'Tirol
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 1, 1985, to consider the detachment and
staff evaluations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the boundary
changes shown on map, Exhibit "A ", and described on the legal description, Exhibit "B ",
herewith attached.
On motion of Councilman Settle ,seconded by Councilwoman Rap pa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted. this rd day of February
1987.
.7 Mayor Pro -Tem Robert ffin
ATTE r ,
Cit} Clerk Pamela V es
R 6156
Resolution No_ 6156 (1987 Series)
Page 2
APPROVED
City Administrative Officer
City A rney
/11f-�461r-1
Community Development Director
FEXI-5777V& UY
OF DU&PJW.7
NEW Lo
i.
m6r#*r aTe twries
AAKE
l.[v7 Acs
UTY umal-:?
TERRMORY 0AI&EVELOPEi
C9\
EXHIBIT A
�l .1 to -qua
E810
Proposed Detachment #2 from the City of San Luis Obispo
LAFCO DESCRIPTION
All that real property in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California,
being. a portion of Parcel B of Parcel Map SL 85 -206, a map of said parcel map
being recorded in Book 39 of Parcel Maps at page 36 in the Office of the County
Recorder of said County; said portion of said Parcel B being more particularly
described as follows:
Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Parcel B, 'said point being on
the existing City Limits;
thence, along said existing City Limits through the following courses:
(1) South 440 18' 46" East 50 feet,
(2) South 650 18' 11" East 170 feet,
(3) South 790 55' 11" East 193.68 feet,
(4) South 10° 31' 34" West 150.53 feet,
(5) South 15° 45' 00" West 270.14 feet,
(6) South 200 15' 00" West 380 feet,
(7) South 89° 04' 58" East a distance of 280 feet to the angle point .
between southerly lines of Parcel A of said Parcel Map said point
being the True Point of Beginning,
EXHIBIT B
APPROVED B'r �.p.F.C.
CERTIFIED BY COUNTY SUS -� �j
Page 2
thence, leaving said existing City Limits', easterly along the boundary of said
Parcel B through the following courses:
(8) North 810 12' 53" East, 602.83 feet;
(9) North 800 01' 49" East, 334.42 feet;
(10.) South 490 33' 31" East, 758:88 feet, to the present City Limits
being a point on th-e southeasterly line of Lot 59 of Stratton's
Subdivision of the Rancho Canada de Los Osos and La Laguna;
thence, along the existing City Limits line:
(11) North 560 53' 50" West�733.68 feet;
(12) South 860 14' 15" West 890 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
Containing 1.67 acres.
;D
3
O 0
RESOLUTION NO. 6155. (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
.APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE UPGRADING OF
THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BROAD AND MARSH STREETS
WHEREAS, the Council has agreed to participate in the upgrading of the
signal installation at Broad and Marsh Streets, and
WHEREAS, this intersection is part of the state highway system and
therefore the state has agreed to participate in the project,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,. that the Council of the City of San Luis.
Obispo hereby:
1. Approves that the certain agreement attached hereto and marked Exhibit
A, and incorporated herein by reference between the City of San Luis Obispo and
the State of California, Department of Transportation, and that the Mayor is
authorized to execute the same.
2. Authorizes the City Clerk to transmit the original and two copies,
attaching to each a copy of the authorizing resolution to:
W. W.. Evans
Local Assistance Engineer
Department of Transportation
P. 0. Box 8114
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8114
for execution by the state.
On motion of Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
seconded by Councilwoman Rappa_...-.,
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
R 6155
Resolution No. �T55(1987 Series)
Page Two.
the foregoing Resolution was passed and
February 1987.
ATTEST:
v
_ CITY Lm PAMELA Vtjs
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
47,C,A-F:�
City Attor I y
/J" F- ance Ii irector
ity Engineer
bl4 /coop -agr
by
this
�� -� �
G��n
�.
� I
Q�
^�
65 -SLO- 227 =13.36
05351 - 344301
State Highway 227 s Marsh Street
District Agreement No, 05A685
THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON February 3,_1987_ _. is between
the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of
Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
A body politic and a municipal
corporation of the State of
California, referred to herein
as CITY
RECITALS
1. STATE ..and CITt'contemplate modifying the traffic
control signal and safety lighting at the intersection of Marsh
Street with State Highway Route 227, referred to herein'as "PROJECT ",
and desire to specify the terms and conditions under which such
system is to be installed, financed and maintained.
Z
I
SECTION I
CITY_ AGREES
1
1. To provide plans and specifications and all necessary
construction engineering services for the PROJECT and pay 100% of the
costs thereof.
2. To identify and locate all high and low risk
underground facilities within the project area and protect or
otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with STATE'S
"Policy on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway
Rights -of- Way ". Costa of locating, identifying, protecting or
otherwise providing for such high and low risk facilities shall be
borne by the CITY. CITY hereby acknowledges the receipt of STATE'S
"Policy on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway
Rights -of -Way" and agrees to construct the PROJECT in accordance with
such Policy
3. To construct the PROJECT in accordance with plans and
specification of CITY, to the satisfaction of and subject to the
approval of STATE.
4. To pay an amount equal to 100% of construction costs.
51 To maintain the entire traffic control signal and
safety lighting as installed and pay an amount equal to 25% of the.
total maintenance costa, including electrical energy costs.
6. To apply for necessary encroachment permits for work
within. State Highway rights -of-way, in accordance with STATE'S
standard permit procedures.
Kq
SECTION II
11 To provide a Model 170 Controller Assembly to CITY, for
the aforesaid PROJECT at no cost to CITY.
20 That the aforesaid Model 170'Controller may be received
by the CITY at Department of Transportation, District 5, 50 Higuera
Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93403 -8114, upon STATE receiving
7 days advance written notice.
3. To reimburse CITY for sTATE's.proportionate share of
the cost of maintenance of said traffic control signal and safety
lighting, such share to be an amount equal to 75% of the total
maintenance cost, including electrical energy costs.
4. To operate the traffic control signal as installed and
pay 1008 of the operation cost.
SECTION III
11 All obligations of STATE under the terms of this
agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the
Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California
Transportation Commission.
2. Neither STATE not any officer or employee thereof shall
be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of
anything done or. omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to STATE under
this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.9 CITY shall fully indemnify and hold
STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by
Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done
or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction not delegated to STATE under this agreement
3. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee tbereof; is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of
anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection
with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under
this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant
to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and
hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined
by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything
done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this
agreement.
4. Should any portion of the PROJECT be financed with
Federal.funds or State gas tax funds all applicable procedures and
policies relating to the use of such funds shall apply
notwithstanding other provisions of this agreement
5. CITY shall not advertise for to construct PROJECT
until after an encroachment permit has been issued by STATE.
6. Upon completion of all work under this agreement,
ownership and title to all materials, equipment and appurtenances
installed will be jointly shared in the ratio of 758 STATE and 25%
CITY.
7. If existing public and private utilities conflict with
the construction of the PROJECT, CITY will make all necessary
arrangements with the owners of such utilities for•their protection,
relocation or removal. CITY will inspect the protection, relocation
or removal, which if there are costs of such protection, relocation;
or removal which STATE and CITY must legally pay, STATE and CITY will
share in the cost of said protection, relocation or.removal, plus
cost of engineering overhead and inspection, in the amount of 0% }!
STATE and 100% CITY.
8. That this agreement shall terminate upon completion aii.d
• i;
acceptance of the PROJECT construction contract by CITY or on
December 30, 1988, whichever is earlier in time; however, the 1
ownership and maintenance clauses shall remain in effect until
terminated, in writing, by mutual agreement.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF AN LU S OBI
Department of Transportation
LEO J. TROMBATORE B +A:
Director of Transporta i h� '' IL Mayor Pr -Teu� Robert ffin
Gam''
By Attest:
Dis rice Director
Cert'fied as to unds and Procedure
District Accounting Officer
`t
APPROVED as to FORM and PROCEDURE
Attorney
nPnartment of Transportation
C$� y Clerk Pamela&oges .-
YY ,
o
RESOLUTION NO. 6154(1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SURETY FOR
TRACT 1122 - WOODBRIDGE MEADOWS
WHEREAS, the Subdivision improvements for Tract 1122 have been completed
except For replanting the channel slope per Condition 16 of Resolution No. 5170
(1983 Series), and
WHEREAS, the Subdivider has ,requested release of $342,000.00 of the
$380,000.00 Faithful Performance Bond which guaranteed installation of the
subdivision improvements for completed work,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
that the Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 1122 shall be reduced to
$38,000.00 to be maintained as a guarantee for completion of channel
revegetation and as a warranty to be maintained for one year after acceptance
of the work in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.: The Public Works
Director is hereby authorized to accept the public improvements upon completion
of the remaining work.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey seconded by Councilman Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle, Rappa and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day o February,
1987.
MAYOR PRO -TEM ROBERT G IFF,IN
ATTES
CIT'I CLERK PAt-JELAI. VO S
R 6154
o
Resolution No. 6154 (1987 Series)
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City Atto ey
�/0e
Community Development Director
x O�L�
City ngineer
jk4 /tll22acc
by
��c�, � ��
��.
� ��
���
�����
RESOLUTION NO. 6153 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY
AS SURPLUS EQUIPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council herein declares three used pool covers
owned by the City of San Luis Obispo as surplus property of no further use or
value to the City.
SECTION 2. That the three pool covers be disposed of by the Recreation
Department in a manner which best serves the interest of the City.
On motion of Councilman Settle , seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd d of February
1987.
ATT Mayor Pro -Tem
CITk CLERK PAMELA VOGUS
s s s s
Approved:
City Administrative Officer
R6153
City Atto
ney
Director.
Finance
R6153
... ., i.
_. 1i'l,l)�� . .
t:- sy C.
Ali .._lt1.,-
�I ,
.
-. . -!_
...
Ki 1 .i
r. M::'1
'1110, A .1::
w% 7
.' _. -
l�.
RESOLUTION NO. 6152 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Council hereby accepts the bid and authorizes the Mayor to sign a
contract on behalf of the City for the following:
PROJECT.: San Luis Obispo Intermodal Facilities CITY PLAN NO.: L -08
Railroad Avenue Area
ESTIMATE: $495,950 FUND NO.: 997
BIDDER: A. J. Diani Construction Co., Inc. BID AMT.: $549;000
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to prepare the
appropriate documents for signature by the successful bidder and the Mayor.
On motion of Councilman Settle
the following roll call vote:
, seconded by Councilwoman Rappa , and on
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted day of
1987. A9 - 00
MAYOR PRO -TE1M ROB
ATTEST:
24.= A
CITY CLERK PAME VO ES
ss� *s *ss
APPROVED:
94?:=
City Administrative Officer
%� .Mal.
City ttorney
R 6152
4
l�
�(i • rrl rr •r.
0
m
n
RESOLUTION NO. 6151 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING INITIAL POLICY
ON THE USE AND MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND
ENCOURAGING THE COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT
A PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
WHEREAS, the presence of hazardous substances and hazardous wastes
creates a potential threat to public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, cost - effective practices and technologies are now readily
available by which to significantly reduce the amount and toxicity of
hazardous materials initially used as well as imposed on society's waste
management capabilities; and
WHEREAS, source reduction of hazardous materials benefits chemical users
by reducing waste disposal fees and long term liability, as well as the costs
of chemical feedstock materials; and
WHEREAS, there is a trend in state and federal law away from disposing of
hazardous wastes in landfills, creating a serious need for alternatives; and
WHEREAS, with the passage of AB 2948, all cities and counties are
authorized to adopt plans for the management and ultimate disposal of all
hazardous wastes generated within their boundaries.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it is the policy of the City of San
Luis Obispo to encourage and promote practices and technologies that will, in
order of priority:
- First, reduce the use of hazardous substances and the generation of
hazardous wastes at their source.
- Second, recover and recycle the remaining waste for reuse.
- Third, treat those wastes not amenable to source reduction or
recycling so that the environment and community health are not
harmed by their ultimate release or disposal.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. A copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Luis Obispo encouraging the County to
implement AB 2948.
SECTION 2. A copy of this resolution be forwarded to all Fire Chiefs and
Mayors of incorporated areas within the county.
On motion of Councilman Settle, seconded by Councilwoman Rappa, and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Settle, Rappa, Dovey and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
R 6151
the foregoing Resolution
January, 1987.
i
was passed and ado d this 20th day
MAYOR PRO - TEMPORE
ATTEST:
U
CI Y CLERK, PAMEL VOGES
* s s s s
Approved:
City Administrative Officer
City Attorney I)
IZP e'ltltell
RESOLUTION NO. 6150 (1987 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
ACTION TO DENY A USE PERMIT FOR A NEW NON- ALCOH_ OLIC NIGHT-
CLUB AT 817 PALM STREET (a113 -86)
WHEREAS, on December 10, 1986, the Planning Commission after a duly noticed public
hearing, and after considering public testimony, staff report, and minutes of the
Director's administrative hearing held on October 31, 1986, denied the use permit the
finding in the attached resolution, Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 1986, Robert Loros did appeal the Planning Commission's
action to the City Council, requesting that the use permit for the new nightclub be
approved; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 1987, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council
did find the following facts and reasons for justifying denial of the appeal and
upholding the Planning Commission's action:
1. The proposed use is likely to conflict with adjacent dwellings due to increased
noise, traffic, and security problems.
2. The city's general plan and Goals for Downtown encourage preservation and
protection of downtown housing from incompatible commercial uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Based on the aforementioned findings, the City Council does deny the
appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's action to deny the requested use permit
A113 -86, subject to the findings as approved.
On motion of Councilwoman Dovey seconded by Councilwoman -
Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
R 6150
7�
ti
Resolution No. 6150 (1987 Series)
A 113 -86
Page 2
AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Rappa, Settle and Mayor Pro -Tem Griffin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of
January 1987.
Mayor Pro -Tem Robe49r-ffin
AT74��
City Clerk Pamela Voge
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
City Att 0 ey if
"Oei(
Community Development Director
��� � 1
C.�, �, �- _ .��
��
;'\