HomeMy WebLinkAbout6975-7010RESOLUTION NO. 7010 (1991 Series)
SUPPORT MAINTAINING THE CURRENT CALIFORNIA ARMY
NATIONAL GUARD FORCE STRUCTURE AND STRENGTH
WHEREAS, the California National Guard is an important part
of our community economic viability and the proposed cuts will
adversely affect city and county revenues; and
WHEREAS, the California National Guard responds to all types
of emergencies such as forest fires, earthquakes, civil
disturbances, and disaster relief; and
WHEREAS, the California National Guard faces potentially
disastrous personnel and budget cuts of 32$ which will impact their
ability to meet the expectations and needs of the citizens of
California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo does hereby support maintaining the current
California Army National Guard force structure and strength.
Upon motion of Yigy T Dimin , seconded by
oun ilwcmon Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: yayor Dumin, Councilwoman Rappa, Councilwoman Pinard and Councilman Reiss.
NOES: Councilman Roalman.
ABSENT: None.
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of August ,
1991. .
ayor Rnin
ATTEST
G: t/
Pam voges, City Clerk
APPROVED:
City A inistrative Officer
1 w_ l - I_� ram
R -7010
.Y ,
RESOLUTION NO. 7009 ( 1991 ''Series)
AUTHORIZING FILING APPLICATIONS FOR STATE
PERMIT TO APPROPRIATE WATER AND A STATE REVOLVING
FUND LOAN TO CONSTRUCT FACILITIES FOR THE RECLAMATION
OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER
WHEREAS, City policy is to pursue a water reclamation
program to supplement the City's water supply, and
WHEREAS, the City plans to construct facilities necessary to
facilitate the aforementioned policy, and
WHEREAS, the City is seeking authorization to appropriate
water for the purpose of water reclamation, and
WHEREAS, the City is seeking funding assistance for the
construction of the water reclamation'facilities through the
State Revolving Fund and the Water Reclamation Loan Program low
interest loans and,
WHEREAS, the State requires designation and authorization of
representatives of the City to file the water appropriation
permit and loan applications and related materials.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo that the City Utilities Director or
his /her designee is hereby authorized and directed to sign and
file, for and on the behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, an
application for the appropriation of water under California Water
Law and any agreements or other documents necessary to secure and
receive a State Revolving Fund Loan under the Clean Water Bond
.Law of 1984, the Water Quality Act of 1987, and the Clean Water
and Water Reclamation Bond Law of 1988. .
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo hereby
agrees and further does authorize the aforementioned
representative or his /her designee to certify that the
municipality has and will comply with all applicable State water
rights regulations, and all applicable State and Federal
statutory and regulatory requirements related to any Federal_ and
State loan funds received.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Utilities Director or
his /her designee of the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby
authorized to execute the resultant water rights and loan
agreements and any amendments thereto for the purpose of securing
water rights and loan funds. A copy of the agreements will be
filed in the office of the City Clerk.
R -7009
Resolution No. 7009 (1991 Series)
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman
aknm , and on the following role call vote:
AYES: Councilwoman Rappa, Councilman Roalman, Councilwomai'Pi=d;
Councilman Reiss and Mayor Dtmin.
NOES: None,
ABSENTS None.
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 6t1, day of
�Q71Rt , 1991.
o00�YOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
Pam !doges, City Clerk
APPROVE • U
City Ad inistrative Officer
r ry Atitornoy
'f
r � i
RESOLUTION No. 7008 (1991)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING AN AREA OF THE CITY AS A.
RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT AREA, ESTABLISHING DAYS
HOURS OF OPERATION OF SAID AREA AND SETTING FEES FOR
APPLICATION AND TIME OF RENEWAL FOR A PARKING PERMIT
AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 90. 3932.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has
received a petition from a majority of the residents living within
the neighborhood shown on the attached Exhibit. A, and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has
determined that the quality of life for the residents of this area
has been adversely affected by non - residents using the neighborhood
streets for par"kag and,.
WHEREAS, the Council of the city of San Luis Obispo has
determined that the elimination of non - resident parked cars from
the district will decrease the ambient noise and air pollution
levels, and improve other environmental characteristics of the
neighborhood and,
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has
determined that. the elimination of the nonresident parked cars will
improve pedestrian and vehicular safety and allow residents to gain
proper access to their residences and,
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis obispo has
determined that there is appropriate alternative parking for non-
resident cars on the Cal Poly Campus.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 10.36.170 et seq.. of the San
Luis Obispo Municipal Code a "residential parking permit area is
hereby established as shown and described on the attached Exhibits
A and B.
SECTION 2. No vehicle other than vehicles providing services
to the area or having a permit attached to it or a visitors permit
on the drivers side of the windshield in clear view may park on any
street in the area between the hours of 8am and 5pm, Monday through
Friday, except for holidays honored by the City of San Luis Obispo.
SECTION 3. The Public Works Department shall be directed to
post the area with signs that clearly indicate these restrictions.
R -7008
Resolution No. 7008
Page Two
SECTION 4. The Parking Division shall issue residential
parking permits and guest parking permits on demand as permitted in
Section 10.36.210 and 10.36.20 of the Municipal Code. Permits shall
be issued for a year effective September 15 and shall not be
prorated if issued during the year.
SECTION 5. The fee for each residential permit shall be $5.
SECTION 6. The fee for each guest permit shall be $5. Guest
Permits shall be issued annually as are the residential parking
permits. Guest permits shall only be valid on the block for which
they are issued.
SECTION 7. The fee for replacement residential permits which
are mutilated, lost or stolen shall be $5. Guest permits shall not
be replaced.
SECTION 8. Residential parking permits shall become void if
either the owner of the vehicle moves out of the area shown on
Exhibits A and B or the owner of the vehicle sells the vehicle to
an individual living outside the area shown in.Exhibits A and B.
SECTION 9. Resolution No. 3932 (1979 series) is hereby
rescinded.
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilwcman.Rappa, Councilman Roalman, Councilwomm Pinard,
Councilman Reiss and Mayor Damn.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th , day
Of A „e,Gt _ , 1991.
Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
U
City C erk p - ; es
l".
Appro
ity dministrative Officer
(l a 14 � r7 n gQO/l (Y U
CA A o _ ey
City Finance Director
Public Works Director
0
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Crand Avenue and
the prolongation of the northerly property line of Fredericks Street,
thence westerly along said northerly line of Fredericks Street to the
southerly prolongation of the westerly line of Longview Lane (formerly
Motley and now abandoned), thence northerly along said westerly line
of Longview Lane to the centerline of Bond Street, thence westerly
along the centerline of Bond Street to the centerline of Hathway,
thence southerly along the centerline of Hathway n distance of 100.00
feet, thence westerly at right angles to said centerline to the
westerly property line of Hathway Avenue, thence northerly along said
westerly line to the southerly line of Carpenter Street, thence
North 0026' East to the northerly line of Ilathway, thence northeasterly
along the northerly property line of Hathway Avenue to the centerline
of Via Carte, thence southerly along said centerline to the centerl -ine
Of Hathway Avenue, thence northeasterly along said centerline to the
centerline of Slack Street, thence southerly and easterly along said
centerline to a point, said point being the intersection of the
centerline of Slack Street and the northerly prolongation of the
easterly line of Lot 12, Tract No. 64 (Alta Vista), thence sou' Oerly
along said prolongation and the easterly line of Lots 12, 22, 23, 24,
and 25 to the northerly line of McCollum Street, thence easterly along
said northerly line of McCollum Street to the centerline of Crand
Avenue, thence southerly along said centerline to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT A
Pot,(
OU0 DISTRICT MUNDARM5
m
Je,5
��Ool
EXHIBIT B
- A 4
J
r i
RESOLUTION NO. 7007 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL FROM THE ACTION OF THE
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TO NOT ALLOW AN
EXCEPTION TO SIGN REGULATIONS WHICH WOULD ALLOW A 30.5
FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN, AT 1525 CALLE.JOAQUIN
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission conducted
a public hearing on application No. ARC 91 -38 on June 3, 1991,
and denied a request to approve an exception to the Sign
Regulations for a higher freestanding sign at 1524 Calle Joaquin;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant.has appealed that decision to
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the testimony
and statements of the applicant, and other interested parties,
and the records of the Architectural Review Commission hearing
and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, the council resolves to deny the .appeal and
uphold the action of the Architectural Review Commission subject
to the following findings:
SECTION 1. Findings.
1. The requested sign and exception to the Sign Regulations are
categorically exempt under provisions of City of San Luis
Obispo CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301.
2. An exception beyond that already approved for signage at
this site would constitute a grant of special priviledge,
and would tend to undermine the city's amortization program
for signs that do not meet current standards.
3. The proposed sign does not comply with the Scenic Highways
Element of the General Plan.
R -7007
Resolution No.
Page 2
On motion of Councilman Roalman ,
seconded by Councilman Reiss and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day
of July , 1991.
ATT
City Clerk Pam ges
APPROVED:
Ci�Administrative Officer
d: \wm \reso \arc91 -38
C�� � C'
���
:o ..
RESOLUTION NO. 7006 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL FROM THE ACTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
COMMISSION TO APPROVE REVISIONS TO PLANS FOR A REMODELED
STOREFRONT AT 798 HIGUERA STREET (ARC 88 -115)
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission conducted
A public hearing on a request to approve revisions to plans for
remodeling a storefront a 798 Higuera Street (ARC 88 -115) on June
3, 1991, and approved the changes subject to modifying the color
scheme for the columns and marquee; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed that decision to
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City council has conducted a public
hearing to consider the appeal on July 2, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the testimony
and statements of the applicant, and other interested parties,
and the records of the Architectural Review Commission hearing
and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, the council resolves to uphold the
appeal and approve the modifications as proposed.by the
applicant, and without requiring modifications to the color
scheme of the columns and marquee, based on the following
findings:
SECTION 1. Findings.
1. The modified design for the proposed project is consistent
with the original design concept approved by the ARC.
On motion of Councilman Roalman
seconded by . Councilman Reiss and on the
following roll call vote:
R -7006
Resolution No.
ARC 88 -115
Page 2
7006(1991 Series)
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day
of
199;1.
ATTES
City erk Pam V es
APPROVED:
W1� fDV
City'Administrative Officer
1
ty Devel,opment D
Dunin
® °
n
RESOLUTION NO. 7005 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR
SUBDIVISION NO. MS 91 -022 LOCATED AT 1150 GROVE STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo,
as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration
of the tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 91 -022, and the
Community Development Director's recommendations, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are
consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the 0 zone.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements
are not likely to.cause serious health problems, substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will
not conflict with easements for access through, or use of
property within, the proposed subdivision.
5. The Community Development Director has evaluated the proposed
subdivision under the California Environmental Quality Act and
the City's Environmental_ Guidelines, and has granted a
negative declaration with mitigation measures included. Said
measures have been incorporated into the project design. The
City Council hereby approves the negative declaration with
mitigation measures.
SECTION 2. Exceptions. Approval of exceptions to the
Subdivision Regulations to allow street frontage width of 52.81
feet where 70 feet is required; and to allow a 22.81 foot wide
R -7005
i
Resolution No. 7005
Page 2
(1991 Series)
accessway with 20 foot wide driveway where.30 foot wide accessway
and 24 foot wide driveway is required, based on the following
findings:
1. Due to the site's unusual shape and creekside location, and
due to the previous partial abandonment of Grove Street, it
is impractical and undesirable to conform to the strict
application of the Subdivision Regulations.
2. The cost to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance
with the standards is not the sole reason for granting the
exceptions.
3.. The exceptions will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the
vicinity.
4. Granting the exceptions is in accord with the intent and
purpose of the Subdivision Regulations, and is consistent with
the general plan and with all applicable specific plans or
other plans of the city.
SECTION 3. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative
map for Minor Subdivision No. 91 -022 be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The subdivider shall submit a final map to the City for
review, approval and recordation.
2. Subdivision Improvement Plans shall show and final map shall
note a building envelope which limits buildable area on Parcel
1 to approximately the same area as approved by the City'-s
Architectural Review Commission as part of a new office.
project (city file number ARC 90 -82), to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
3. Subdivider shall provide individual sewer, water and utility
services for each parcel, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and Utilities Director. New utilities shall be
underground.
4. Subdivider shall install a fire hydrant on the Grove Street
frontage near the driveway serving the site, to the
satisfaction of the City Fire Marshal and Public Works
Resolution No. 7005 (1991 Series)
Page 3
Department staff.
5. Subdivider shall submit a common driveway and parking lot
agreement and final map shall show an easement, to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director and City
Attorney.
SECTION 4. Code Requirements. The following represent
standard requirements required by 'various codes, ordinances, and
Policies of the City of San Luis Obispo, but are not limited to the
following:
i. Subdivider shall install street trees in accordance with city
standards and to the satisfaction of the City Arborist.
2. Subdivider shall pay water acreage and frontage fees as
determined by the City Engineer, prior to final map approval.
3. Lot corners shall be staked by a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor.
On motion of Councilman Roalman , seconded by Councilman Reiss
and on the following roll call voter
AYES: Councilnembers Roal=, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of
IL31Y , 1991.
Ron Dunin
Resolution No. 7005 (1991 Series)
Page 4
APPROVED:
ity Ad inistrative Officer
t Director
n
0
J
r - ...
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7004 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
CONFIRMING COSTS OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALKS CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE
1991 ACT AND AMENDING EXHIBIT "A" OF RESOLUTION NO. 6947 (1991 SERIES)
follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
SECTION 1. That pursuant to public hearings duly held, the
Council hereby determines that there are no objections or protests to
the costs of construction submitted by the Superintendent of Streets
and hereby confirms said costs as submitted and as set forth hereafter.
SECTION 2. That the hereinafter listed construction costs
shall be paid within five (5) days after the
costs remaining unpaid thereafter shall be t
Collector to be placed as a lien against the
with the city taxes, and subject to the same
paid on the first installment. The property
construction costs are shown on Exhibit "A ".
date hereof and any such
urned over to the City Tax
property and collected
penalties and costs if not
owenrs, addresses and
SECTION 3. If the assessment is $1,000 or more, payment may be
made in three annual installments at seven percent (7 %) interest
subject to all the curative clauses and powers of the.1911 Act. 'The
property owners addresses and construction costs are shown in Exhibit
"B ". -
R -7004
n
Resolution No. 7004
1991 Series
SECTION 4. Resolution No. 6947 (1991 Series) is hereby amended
to remove S.J. and B.J. Cegielski at 743 Caudill from Exhibit "A ".
On motion of Councilman Roalman . seconded by Councilman Reis,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of
July , 1991.
ATTEST•
city Jerk P oges
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
L`eL's��/�i4
Public Works Director
sidacaismp /th #1
dh
J
EXHIBIT A
Locations of improvements, owners, costs
Location
2065 Price Street
2006 Chorro Street
1043 Marsh Street
367 Branch Street
2150 King Street
(Branch St. side)
1690 Phillips Street
(Park Street side)
406 Ferrini Road
dh
W. C. Taylor 41122.49
. a
4te i
/5
Owner
Cost
H. H.
& J. R. Brown
$ 685.00
D. M.
Bradbeer, et al.
11187.50
E. L.
Zanoli
1,256.25
D. E.
Weddle
2,150.00
S.M.S.
Co.
2,340.00
c/o F.
McNamara
S. M.
Kiggens, et al.
21410.00
W. C. Taylor 41122.49
. a
4te i
/5
EXHIBIT B
Owners requesting three year pay -off option
S.J. and B.J. Cegeilski 743 Caudill $1270.00
sidccons.wp /th #1
dh
at
sPO'K
/`jtggl
I rW
��
�V
S 1
RESOLUTION NO. 7003 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DECLARING PROPERTY LISTED IN EXHIBIT A AND B
AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby declares that all items of property
listed in Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein by reference are surplus
property.
SECTION 2. Disposal of the property shall be made as determined by sale at public
auction or by another method of disposal in accordance with the City's surplus property policy
as determined by the Director of Finance to be in the best interest of the City.
On motion of Reiss , seconded by Roalman , and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this Lthday of T„iy ,1991.
w
_ e Mow
ayor Ron Dunin
PamWoges, City
APPROVED:
n
ity Administrative Officer
Director of Finance
R -7003
EXHIBIT A
city of s Luis oBispo
25 Prado Road • San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
To: Bill Statler, Finance Director
Via: William T. Hetland, Utilities Director
From: John E. Moss, Wastewater Division Manager
SUBJECT: SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY, WASTEWAT TREATMENT PILOT
PLANT EQUIPMENT
In 1989 the City retained the services of the University of North
Dakota, Energy and Mineral Research Center (EMRC), to construct
and operate a wastewater pilot study to identify the most cost
effective treatment processes for the plant expansion projects.
The study was a big success and was key in the development of the
Unit 4 Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements design.
Since about November 1989, the remnants of the pilot plant have
been stored at the wastewater treatment plant. The pilot plant
consisted of four units or skids, with one skid belonging to
EMRC, one to-Brown and Caldwell and the remaining two the
property of the City. With the construction of the treatment
plant improvements to begin in July 1991, it has now become
necessary to remove the pilot plant equipment from the plant
grounds.
Brown and Caldwell (B &C)-had earlier expressed
interest.in
purchasing the City's portion of the pilot plant
and staff has
recently negotiated a purchase price of $5,000
with B &C. It
should be noted that the City expended considerably
more for the
construction of the pilot plant, however its value
is limited to
its use as a pilot study facility. Wastewater
treatment staff
has completed an inventory of the salvageable
equipment and has
provided the following full purchase price estimate:
48 ft. 12 in. sch 80 pvc pipe @ $10.20 /ft =
$489.00
72 ft. 6 in. Excelon pipe @ $7.00 /ft =
$504.00
Misc. Couplings =
$200.00
100 brass ball valves @ $6.00 ea. _
$600.00
3 3in. gate valves @42.81 ea. _
$128.00
12 2 in. plastic ball valves @ $32.00 ea. _
$384.00
2 60 amp electrical panels @ $100.00 ea. _
$200.00
40 misc. circuit breakers @ $2.00 ea. _
$ 80.00
9 thermal overload switches @ $20.00 ea. _
$180.00
24 diffusers @ $30.00 ea. _
$720.00
14 pressure gauges @ $10.00 ea. _
$140.00
2 in -line turbidimeters @ $100.00 ea. _
$200.00
TOTAL SALVAGEABLE EQUIPMENT
$3825.00
C -8 -3
Pilot Plant Surplus Property
Page 2
Skid and tank scrap metal
TOTAL
t approximately
00 ner ton =
01.00
Based on the above value estimates of what the City could
reasonably expect to sell the pilot plant equipment for, a sale
price of $5,000 to Brown and Caldwell seems reasonable and would
be in the best interest of the City. As stated previously, the
real value of the equipment is in its use fora pilot study and
hence its greater value to Brown and Caldwell, a consulting
engineering firm.
Staff is recommending authorization for sale of the above listed
equipment, including skids and tanks, to Brown and Caldwell
Engineers at the price of $5,000. Revenue from the sale of the
equipment should go to the Sewer Fund (052).
If you have any questions regarding this request, please don't
hesitate to call me.
c -e 4
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SURPLUS PROPERTY
July 1, 1991
Descri tip ion QUANTITY UNIT VALUE
Canon Copier Model NP 155 1 $250.00
Canon Copier Model 210 1 $250.00
Canon Copier Model 3225 F 1 $250.00
Canon Copier Model NP 155 1 $250.00
TOTAL
EXHIBIT B
TU TAL VALUE
$ 250.00
$ 250.00
$ 250.00
$ 250.00
$1,000.00
C,8.5
�g G •
�'"
C
RESOLUTION NO. 7002 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DIRECTING STAFF
TO FILE AN APPLICATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
FOR PARTICIPATION IN ITS ENERGY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
WHEREAS, SB 880 has provided funds to the.California Energy
Commission (CEC) for energy support to local governments through
the Energy Partnership Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo qualifies to
participate in the CEC's Energy Partnership Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of San.Luis Obispo recognizes that
assistance will allow better use.of limited staff resources and
expertise to deal with energy matters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo hereby authorizes and directs the City of San
Luis Obispo to file an.application with the California Energy
Commission for participation in.its Energy Partnership Program:
Upon motion of Councilman Reiss seconded by Councilman.
Roalman and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council members Reiss, Roa.lman and Mayor Dtmin
NOES • None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of JUy
1991.
�' R RON DUNIN
ATTESTt
CITYJ CLERK PAME VOGES
R -7002
Resolution No. 7002(1991 Series)
APPROVED:
City inistrative Officer
energyres /dfr #29
J
���� 0 d
AGENCY City of San Luis Obispo
ADDRESS 990 Palm Street
(Mailing Address)
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
CONTACT PERSON Tom Harrington
TITLE -Energy Coordinator PHONE (805)549 -7220
Applicants A resQluuotl morn your gpW,eming. boar d; #"uthorizing you to apply
to, the Energy Partner htp Program•,ust be included with this application.
T'w
Please answer the following questions clearly and succinctly.
1. What kind of assistance are you requesting, and what do you expect to accomplish using
this assistance? Energy element for General Plan staff training loans technical
assistance, design, consultation for ongoing programs; 250,000 - 500,000 annual SF:I•.
savings, $25M - $50M annual cost savings
2. At what stage are you?
;X; We would like assistance in analyzing our energy options.
IX_. We have completed some analysis and would like assistance in identifying and /or comparing
options.
g We are developing a project and would like assistance in overcoming a barrier preventing us
from moving forward.
Other
3. Have any studies, relevant to this request, been previously conducted?
X Yes No
If yes, please include a copy of all studies. Newcomb /Anderson study on file w/ CEC
(N -5 -540
4. Have you implemented any of the recommendations in the studies identified in item 3?
X. Yes No
If yes, please list the things you have done.
See attachments (study on file with CEC)
5 Have you had an energy conservation audit?
x Yes No
If yes, please list the.measures implemented and enclose a copy of the audit.
See attachments (audit on file with CEC) _ ___
6. Have you had a vehicle fleet analysis?
Yes X No
7. Name your electric utility. Pacific Gas &. Electric
Name your gas utility. Southern California Gas
8. For energy production projects, identify how you will use the energy produced by the project.
P-` - Use at facility to displace energy tY P . purchases
Sell to utility
Sell to local industrial or institutional customer
Undecided
9. Explain how you plan to provide the 25 percent match contribution for eligibility under
this program.
Via in place funding .of current_ Energy Coordinator.
x
G
1 �
RESOLUTION NO. 7001 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE REMOVAL OR IMMOBILIZATION
OF ILLEGALLY PARKED VEHICLES IN THE NO PARKING TOW AWAY ZONE
AREA OF DOWNTOWN ON THURSDAYS DURING THE HOURS OF 5:30PM TO 9:OOPM
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the closure of downtown
streets on Thursday nights for Farmers' Market activities; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to ensure no vehicles are parked on
the streets where Farmers' Market activities take place each
Thursday between the hours of 5:30pm to 9:00pm; and
WHEREAS, the BIA has requested the placement of permanent No
parking Tow Away Zone.signs in the Farmers' Market closure area;
and
WHEREAS, the City must meet parking sign standards and give
the public reasonable notice of the parking restrictions on
Thursday nights; and
WHEREAS, the City shall install permanent street signs which
meet Department of Transportation standards for size and color
informing the public of the no parking and tow away zone
restrictions on Thursdays between the hours of 5 :30pm to 9:00pm.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo as follows:
A. It shall be illegal for vehicles to park on downtown city
streets which are posted with authorized signs establishing the
area as a No parking Tow Away Zone on Thursdays between the hours
of 5:30pm to 9:00pm.
B. Authorized city personnel shall be able to issue parking
citations for prohibitive parking and /or remove (tow) the vehicle
under California Vehicle Code (22651n) and /or immobilize the
vehicle in place if it is determined by authorized personnel to
create an unnecessary risk to the public to remove said vehicle..
Exhibit B
R =7001
Resolution No. 7001
Page Two
(1991 Series)
i
On motion of Councilman Reiss seconded by Councilman Roa�man,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day
of July , 1991.
ATT
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
PUBLIC WORXS DIRECTOR
MAYOR RON DUNIN
� ��
���;�,�
� ��
fib\
RESOLUTION NO. 7000 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING TRAFFIC WORK ORDERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
The Traffic Work Orders for the period of April 1, 1991
through June 30, 1991 are hereby approved.
On motion of Councilmember Reiss , seconded by Councilmember
Roalman, and on the following roll call vote
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None '
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Rappa
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day
of July 1991.
`¢ MAYOR Ron Dunin
ATTES :
CITY CLERK PatQ5pges
APPROVED:
City Administrative Off
L
City Engineer
R -7000
Jrl wrk -ord
by
w I
c� o san Lu4osispo
��I�I�III LJNCIL XGENDA REP®RT
MEETING DATE:
July 16, 1991
ITEM NUMBERC 42,
FROM:
David F. Romero, Public Works Director re
Wayne A. Peterson, City Engineer
Prepared by: John Rawles, Engineering Assistant /Traffic
SUBJECT:
Traffic Work Orders for the.Period of April 1, 1991 through June 30,
1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pass Resolution Approving Traffic Work Orders for the Period of
April 1, 1991 through June 30, 1991.
The City Engineer has, over the past three months, issued work orders
making changes to improve safety and operation of the street system ar
parking facilities. Of these work orders, 2% were for signal timing
changes; 2% tree trimming for sight distance; 12% for changes in
pavement markings; 18% parking related; 31% were red curbing requests;
and 35% were for changes in signing.
It has been Council's policy in the past to accept this report on a
quarterly basis. This report satisfies this past policy.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Minor implementation costs associated with street maintenance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pass resolution approving traffic work orders for the period of
April 1, 1991 through June 30, 1991.
Completed traffic work orders are available
in the Council Office for review.
jrl/wrk -ord
by
co-a-
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING TRAFFIC WORK ORDERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
The Traffic Work Orders for the period of April 1, 1991
through June 30, 1991 are hereby approved.
On motion of seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day
of , 1991.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
jrl/w kord
eV
TV
RESOLUTION NO. 6999
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPPORTING THE
FOURTH OF JULY 1991 CELEBRATION
WHEREAS, the Fourth of July is a national holiday, celebrating Independence
Day since 1776;
WHEREAS, this patriotic holiday is a symbol of our national pride and
accomplishments; and
WHEREAS, we want to show our respect for all the men and women who
have served in America's armed services during conflicts in the World Wars, Korea and
Vietnam;
WHEREAS, cities and towns across the nation commemorate the Fourth of
July by observing a variety of community activities;
WHEREAS, San Luis Obispo salutes the guardians of our independence,
recognizes the men and women who have served their country and, welcomes home the
veterans of Desert Storm and their families;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo does support a traditional Fourth of July Parade, to honor the
American spirit and pride in the values and principles for which our nation stands;
On motion of Mayor D u n i n seconded by
Councilman Reiss on the following roll call vote;
AYES: 'Mayor Dunin, Councilmembers Reiss, and Rappa
NOES: Councilman Roalman
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day
of July, 1991.
ATTEST:
I
PAM VOGES, C CLERK
n , §,
RON DUNIN, MAYOR
R 6999
Res. No. 6 9 9 � 1991 Series)
Page 2
APPROVED:
ity A &alive Officer
<-a&yt�
ty om y
0
CA
.;
RESOLUTION NO..6998 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION,
THEREBY•DENYING CHANGES TO APPROVED PLANS FOR REMODELLING A
CARWASH AT ..1023 MARSH STREET (ARC 88 -104)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicant's request to
modify approved plans ARC 88 -104, the Architectural Review
Commission's action, staff recommendations and reports thereon,
makes the following findings:
1. The proposed changes are not consistent with the adopted
Architectural Guidelines, as the different elements and
materials are not compatible with each other and do not
present a pleasing appearance.
2. The project as built is not consistent with approved
building plans.
SECTION 2. Appeal denied. The appeal of the Architectural
Review Commission's action is hereby denied, and the following is
required:
1. The tilework and lettering on the monument sign must be
corrected to be consistent with approved building plans.
2. The "menu" signing must -be removed.
3. The sign planter must be finished in a smooth finish, with
a tile band, in accordance with approved.building plans.
4. Paint must be applied to the building fascias.
5.. The rear planters may be replaced with a larger planter box
near the cashier- booth.
6. The screen walls adjacent to the vacuum equipment must be
of uniform height equal to the highest existing point.
7. The pedestrian walkway across the front of the site must
be clearly defined. The walkway may be defined
R 6998
Resolution No. 6998 (1991 Series)
ARC 88 -104: 1023 Marsh Street
or paint or other means, subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
8. All of the above must be. completed within ninety days
(October 2, 1991).
On motion of Councilman Roalman ,
seconded by Councilman Reiss and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilwoman Rappa
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day
of July , 1991.
`Mayor, Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
City C erk Pam Vm es
APPROVED:
City Admi istrative Officer
4
w
/b
4 t
1
RESOLUTION NO.6 9 9 7 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING POLICIES TO GUIDE THE MANAGEMENT OF THE
CITY'S AUTOMATED INFORMATION RESOURCES
WHEREAS, establishing a comprehensive policy to govern the City's management and
use of its office automation resources was a key objective in the 1989 -91 Financial Plan; and
WHEREAS, the importance of completing this task was reinforced by the Council
during their goal- setting process for the 1991 -93 Financial Plan; and
WHEREAS, the need to establish an overall policy for managing the City's
information systems is highlighted by the City's extensive use and investment in computer
hardware and application software as well as ongoing system development, implementation,
and support costs; and
WHEREAS, the steps in developing the proposed management information system
(MIS) policies included the preparation of a comprehensive inventory of the City's hardware
capabilities and. included a high - level review by the Warner Group to assess present systems,
identify opportunities for improvement, and to outline an action plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that the Management Information Systems Policies provided in Attachment A are
hereby adopted.
vote:
Councilman Councilwoman
On motion of Reiss , seconded by xa p p a and on the following roll call
APES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
4 C. O 0 1
Resolution No. 6997 (1991 Series)
Page Two
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted the 2nd day of
July , 1991.
A T:
P Voges, City Oerk
City
of Finance
Officer
ayor on unin
ol
r
-' /4ttechmen A
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS POLICIES
PURPOSE STATEMENT
Over the next four years, the further growth and overall management of the City's
information systems should proceed from an established conceptual framework. The City-
wide management information system (MIS) policies outlined below are intended to provide
this framework.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS POLICIES
A. Decentralization and Compatibility
1. The City's system should be a micro -based (but networked), decentralized
system as opposed to a centralized data processing function.
2. Decentralized system groupings should be determined based on physical
locations such as City Hall, Corporation Yard, or Police Station.
3. Although decentralized, the City's information systems should be compatible,
maxan� izin_g the easy exchange of information between users and departments,
and minimising the duplication of data bases and maintenance efforts.
B. Full Use of Existing Systems
1. The full use of existing systems should be a foremost goal,, and thus achieved
in advance of acquiring any additional major systems and equipment.
2, In order to fully utilize existing systems, an aggressive program of ongoing
training should be provided. The training of staff to use existing equipment
and software should be a priority activity and appropriately supported as such.
C, Acquisition of New Systems
The acquisition and implementation of major systems should be accomplished
by working from an established City -wide priority list. The priority list should
be fora four year period and evaluated and modified at least annually, based
on changing needs and products. Completion of this priority listing should
be accomplished within the next two years.
2. When acquisitions are necessary, the City should strive for "state of the art"
hardware and software, but not by purchasing unproven or speculative
equipment and systems. Accordingly, new systems or equipment should have
demonstrated reliability and performance in other organizations prior to their
consideration for use by the City.
3. Major acquisitions should be evaluated against a standard criteria which
assures that cost- benefit issues, compatibility of .hardware and software,
availability of implementation and maintenance resources, and tr aining
requirements are fully considered.
4. The City should acquire equipment and systems only if the skills and resources
to effectively implement and manage the systems are available.
5. Existing, tested and proven "off the shelf' software should be used wherever
possible before seeking custom computer programming. Custom programming
should be used only if it can be shown to be a more cost-effective solution to
the problem.
6. All software utilized in the City should be consistent with copyright laws..
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
A. City Council /CAO
1. Policies
The Council adopts the City's Management Information Systems Policies. The
City Administrative Officer (CAO) recommends to the Council new policies
and revisions to existing ones.
2. Resources
The Council allocates the resources necessary to acquire and manage the
City's information systems. The Council also approves specific acquisitions
consistent with the City's purchasing policies. Based on an approved priority
list, the CAO makes specific recommendations to the Council regarding the
allocation of resources and system acquisitions.
B. MIS Steering Committee
1. Responsibilities
Composed of top -level representatives from throughout the organization, the
MIS Steering Committee .is responsible for;
a. Approving MIS standards.
b. Recommending changes to the City's MIS policies to the CAO.
C. Reviewing departmental proposals for new applications and making
recommendations to the CAO for inclusion in the priority list as
appropriate.
d. Monitoring the implementation and performance of existing and
proposed MIS applications.
2. Membership
The MIS Steering Committee has seven members as follows:
a. Assistant City Administrative Officer
b. Director of Finance
C. Three representatives selected, by the Office Automation Users Group
to serve for a two year period.
d. Two representatives selected by the Management Team to serve for
a two year period.
3. Staff Support
The Information Systems Coordinator serves as staff support to the MIS
Steering Committee.
C. Department of Finance
The Department of Finance is responsible for:
1: Implementing the City's information systems policies and standards.
2. Coordinating the effective use of the City's decentralized information systems.
3. Assuring that City-wide information system needs are effectively served
pursuant to established City-wide priorities.
4. Assisting in the establishment of City-wide priorities for new system
acquisitions.
5. Assuring adequate support, maintenance, and training for the full utilization
of existing City-wide systems:
a. Finance will assist in the support (including maintenance, repairs,
replacement, data communication, and training) all City-wide hardware
and software standards that are currently installed or connected to the
local area networks (LAN's). This support includes operating and
system software, but excludes specific departmental data, files, reports,
or applications which may use these software packages.
b. Operating departments are responsible for installing and supporting all
specialized applications (including software, hardware, data
communications, and training) whether provided on a stand alone or
LAN basis.
C. On a case -by -case basis, Finance may support departmental applications
when requested by the department, recommended by the MIS Steering
Committee, ' and approved by the CAO.
6. Managing the City's other electronic systems such as copiers and telephones.
D. • Operating Departments
Departments are responsible for:
1. Utilizing existing information systems in an efficient and effective manner.
2. Identifying existing and future system needs.
3. Assisting in the establishment of City -wide priorities for new system
acquisitions.
4. Assuring the full use of existing equipment and software prior to developing
requests for additional acquisitions.
5.- Installing and supporting specialized applications.
6. Appointing a System Administrator for their LAN (or other major
departmental system).
E. System Administrators
Each network or major departmental system shall have a "system administrator" who
will have lead responsibility for the performance of that location's micro or mini
computer system. Each System Administrator should form a "user group" within
their network to resolve network problems and to comment on system -wide
problems.
Locations and systems which require a System Administrator include:
1. City Hall
a. Local Area Network
b. System 36 - Finance
C. System 36 - Community Development
2. 955 Morro (Utilities and Public Works Administrative Offices)
3. Corporation Yard
4. Police Station
5. Fire Station No. 1
6. Parking Administrative Offices
7, Recreation Administrative Offices
F. An Office Automation Users Group will be maintained to advise on the
implementation and management of City -wide information services. The Information
Systems Coordinator will be the System Administrator for the City Hall LAN and
will serve as the Chair of the Users Group. The Users Group will consist of all
System Administrators as well as one representative from each Department without
an employee designated as a System Administrator.. With this approach, all
departments will be represented in the Users Group.
ISVOIICIES.YPF
MEMORANDUM
April 23, 1990
TO: John Dunn, City Administrative Officer
FROM Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer
William C. Statler, Director of Finance
Jeff Thacker, Chief Accountant
Peggy Johnston, Technical Services Coordinator
Attachment ? .
SUBJECT: OVERVIEW OF TI4E CITY'S MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PURPOSE
This document has been prepared in order to provide an overview of the resources currently
allocated to the City's management information systems (MIS). This resource inventory
includes not only the City's hardware capabilities (mini - computers, printers, personal
computers, and terminals) but also the applications that are currently automated as well as
those proposed for automation over the next three to four years. Additionally, a summary of
the City's human resources dedicated to managing automated information systems is also
provided.
REPORT ORGANIZATION AND PREPARATION
In presenting the.City's MIS resources, this document has been organized into the following
five sections:
Section A - Transmittal Memorandum
This section summarizes the purpose, organization, and preparation of the report; highlights
application. uses and key findings; and suggests topics for future research and discussion.
Section B T Summary of Existing and Requested Applications
An overview of existing. and proposed uses of the City's MIS resources is provided in this
section for each. of the City' major organizational units summarized as follows:
■ Applications currently installed and operational.
■ Applications which may be ' installed but require additional enhancements in
order to fully meet system requirements. Those requiring additional-
acquisition
or development costs in addition to staff.support for implementation have been
so noted.
■ New applications recommended for acquisition, development, and
implementation over the next three to four years.
■ Applications (existing and proposed) that have multi - departmental uses,
interfaces, or impacts:.
The information provided in this section is primarily based on interviews with key department
personnel regarding their existing and proposed system. uses. Jeff 'Thacker conducted the
interviews with City Attorney, City Clerk, Finance, Personnel, Utilities, Public Works, and
Recreation. Peggy Johnston conducted the interviews with Administration, Community
Development, Police, and Fire. A listing of key staff members interviewed is provided in
Exhibit A. In addition to application uses, summaries of the department's hardware inventory,
1989 -91 budget for information systems, and level of technical staff support are also provided.
Section C - Summary of Existing Staff Support
This section provides a summary of the City's key staff (system administrators) who support
the existing information systems. Name, title, department, summary of responsibilities, and
estimated percentage of time allocated to system administration responsibilities is provided
for each support staff member. Management Team members (several of whom may dedicate
significant efforts to managing their department's MIS resources) are not included in this
summary.
Section D - Summary of 1989 -91 MIS Budgets
A summary of departmental budgets for AS expenditures is provided in this section based on
the 1989 -91 Financial Plan line- items.
Section E - Summary of Existing System Hardware
An overview of the City's existing hardware configurations and inventory is provided in this
section organized into the following three parts:
■ Schematic overview of the City's MIS configurations at six key locations (City
Hall, 955 Morro, Police Station, Fire Station No. 1, Recreation Building, and
Corporation Yard).
■ Summary of the City's MIS hardware inventory by department and division.
■ Detail inventory of the City's MIS hardware by department and user.
APPLICATION USES
The City's current and proposed uses of information system technology can be generally
categorized into the following five groups:
■ Office Automation
Text processing represents the City's largest current use of automated systems,
and enhancements to this basic application along with other key office products
such as electronic wail, calendaring, and voice communications were extensively
requested by the operating departments. Office a_ utomation represents the
broadest group of common MIS uses City - wide.
s Public. Safety
Both the Police and Fire Departments make extensive use of automated
information systems in their daily operations. The greatest current commitment
of resources is in the areas of computer aided dispatch (CAD) and records
management. Most of these applications are unique to public safety uses, and
do not have signif icant data interactions organization -wide except between these
two departments.
■ Financial Management
Most of the City's key financial management activities (general ledger, accounts
payable, payroll, and utility billing) have been automated. On an operating
basis, day -to -day activities are limited to the Department of Finance. however,
the entire organization is affected by the output of many Finance. products
(payroll checks) and is dependent upon the management information provided
by the system.
■ Specialized Technical Applications
Each department has a variety of specialized information technology which may
significantly improve its productivity but have limited impacts on the broader
organization. Examples include hydrology models, building permit issuance,
traffic circulation models, computer aided drafting and design (CADb), and
telemetry systems.
■ Geographic. Information Systems (GIS)
The City is in its relative infancy in the area of automated geographic
information systems. Based on the results of the departmental surveys, there is
significant interest organization -wide in significantly expanding the City's use
of GIS applications. If implemented on a highly integrated, interactive level,.
GIS will have significant organization -wide impacts due to its cost and the broad
base of potential users and data bases,.
SYSTEM HIGHLIGHTS
The following is a brief summary of highlights regarding the City's information system
capabilities and resources:
The City has made extensive use of information systems technology: with 317
regular authorized positions, the City has over 190 work stations.
■ The City has made a significant investment in information systems technology:
$463,000 has been invested in personal computer hardware, $69,000 in mini-
computer hardware, $100;000 in application and system software, and an
unknown (but significant investment) in system development, implementation,
and support.
■ $744,200 has been budgeted over the_ ,next two years for MIS a_ pplications:
$406,600 to support operations and $377,600 for new acquisitions.
There is abroad variation in software and hardware configurations throughout
the organization, although conceptual standardization (I•BM compatible
processors, Hewlett Packard laser printers, and word processing software) has
been achieved.
■ The City does not have a high -level of integration or interactive use of its
various information system networks; For example: the two IBM System 36
mini - computers do not communicate with each other and there is limited
communication with the City Hall local area network (LAN); users of the two
System 36 mini - computers are primarily limited to departmental employees, and
the limited number of other department users are restricted solely to City Hall;
and none of the individual LAN's communicate with each other.
■ The City's two mini - computers (Finance and Community Development) have
reached their disk storage and work station expansion limits, and accordingly,
will require significant upgrades or reptacement in the near future.
■ Consistentwith its overall management philosophy, the City has historically used
a highly decentralized approach in managing the acquisition, implementation,
and operation of its information system technology.
TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION
Based on the overview of the City's information management resources identified in this
report, the following topics are recommended for future research and discussion:
■ Is there a need for better integration of the City's existing information systems?
■ If so; what additional hardware, software, and staff support will be required
to successfully integrate them?
■ Are there future system development and integration requirements that will
require any significant increases in capital outlays and staff support for them
to be successfully implemented?
■ Has the City adequately addressed the copying and installation of proprietary
software as well as the use of "bootleg" and personal software?
■ What is the best approach in meeting the City's mini - computer data storage,
access, and retrieval needs?
■ Based on existing financial and staff capabilities, will prioritization of new
system installations be required, and if so, what process should be used in
assigning priorities?
■ Does the City require a high level of on -line, "real- time ", interactive /integrated
information systems?
■ Are any changes required in the current organization of the City's information
management, staff resources in order to most effectively manage existing and
proposed information systems?
■ Are existing organizational structures and methods of communication adequate
to ensure an appropriate level of inter - departmental coordination of system
plans and programs?
N Is continuing the City's historical approach of decentralization appropriate in
meeting the current and future MIS needs of the City, or is this a function
where the City could clearly benefit from increased centralization in defined
areas? (For example, a combination of centralization and decentralization
depending on the, nature and scope of the service and operation.)
■ How should the large number of pending requests be reviewed and approved in
order to ensure that:
1. they are truly needed;
2 will provide benefits consistent with their cost;
3. properly fit with existing systems;
4, cumulatively will take us where we want to go;
And overall, are necessary; justified, cost- effective, and appropriately a part of
the City's total management information system?
Hopefully, the information developed in this overview document can provide a meaningful
framework for the discussion of these key questions restardinA the future of the City's
management information systems. . __,
Attachment G
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
• CITY HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL SO FAR
NEED TO PRIORITIZE NEEDS LIST
• MUST DECIDE CITY -WIDE SYSTEMS STRATEGY
IMPROVED PLANNING NEEDED TO
MEET GOALS
- AVOID "AD HOC" DECISIONS
• UPDATE PC CONFIGURATION STANDARDS
The Warner Gronp
Maaagemmt Consultmtr
0
M
RESOLUTION NO.6 9 9 6
(1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO AND LYNN BLOCK, BIA ADMINISTRATOR, FOR THE
PERIOD JULY 3, 1991 THROUGH JULY 3, 1992
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION '1. That the contract of employment. between the City of San Luis
Obispo and Lynn Block as BIA Administrator for the period July. 3, 1991 through July
3, 1992, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference .made a part hereof, has
been reviewed and is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same.
On motion of Councilman. Reiss , seconded by Councilwoman Rappa,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa, Roalman, and. Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2 n d day of s u 1 y, 19 91.
ATTEST:
CITY OLERK P a o g e s
YOR Ron. Dunin
R 6996
(A- 88- 91 -CC)
Resolution No. 6996
page 2
APPROVED:
lw kAl.,
Personnel Director
Finance Director
� � C
p
T` \
C
0
AGREEMENT N0. A- 88 -91 -CC
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT
THIS CONTRACT is entered into this third day of July, 1991, by and between
the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, State of California (hereinafter referred to as "City "),
and LYNN BLOCK, a contract employee (hereinafter referred to as "Employee ").
WITNESSES:
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has a need to hire an employee for a
special project for which the continued funding or need for the project is too uncertain
to create a regular classification; and
WHEREAS, Employee is qualified to perform such service for City; and
WHEREAS, the services to be contracted for are BIA Administrator.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
1. Employment. City hereby engages Employee and Employee hereby agrees to
perform for City the services hereinafter set forth for the compensation hereinafter set
forth, all pursuant to the terms and conditions herein.
2. Scope of Services. Pursuant to this Contract, Employee shall provide to City
the following services: Administrator for the Downtown Parking and Business
Improvement Association (BIA); specific duties and responsibilities to be established and
modified from time to time by the BIA Advisory Board. Employee shall perform said
services under the direct supervision of BIA Advisory Board.
3. Employment Status. Employee shall be a full-time employee. Membership
in the City PERS retirement program shall be in accordance with PERS requirements
with the Employee's share to be paid by Employee. Employee shall accrue holiday and
sick leave benefits consistent with other positions in the' City and as. determined by the
Personnel Director. Employee shall accrue 8.00 hours of vacation per month over the
��BUT "A" A (R 6996)
term of this Agreement which shall be taken in a manner consistent with other City
employees. Employee shall be granted up to 40 hours per year of administrative leave
in lieu of overtime compensation, in recognition of the fact that the employee is exempt
from overtime compensation consideration and that the employee's schedule may require
work beyond 40 hours in a week. The only other paid benefits are workers'
compensation insurance and unemployment insurance. Employee shall be eligible for
reimbursement for mileage at a rate of $0.27.5 per mile for use of her private
automobile for official business but not including any mileage attributable to normal
commuting by Employee to and from her office. Employee will also receive a monthly
permit for the Palm Street Parking structure.
Employee understands and agrees that her term of employment is governed only
by this Contract; that no right of tenure is created hereby, and that she does not hold
a position in any department or office of the City.
4. Warranty of Employee. Employee warrants that she is properly certified and
licensed under the laws and regulations of the State of California to provide the services
herein agreed to.
5. Compensation. City shall pay to Employee as compensation in full for all
services performed by Employee pursuant to the Contract, the sum of $3,000 per month
($36,000 per year), said compensation to be paid in accordance with normal City
procedures.
6. Term of Contract. This Contract shall commence on July 3, 1991 through July
3, 1992, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The City Administrative Officer
may terminate the contract without the need for action, approval or ratification by the
City Council.
2
J
7. Termination -of Contract - .for_ Convenience. Either party may terminate this
Contract at any time by giving to the other party fifteen (15) days written notice of such
termination, specifying the effective date of such termination. Employee shall be paid
for all work satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of such termination.
Employee agrees that the notice provisions of this paragraph shall limit the liability
of the City in the event that a termination action taken .by City pursuant to paragraph
8 is subsequently found to be improper.
8._ Termination of Contract for Cause. If Employee fails to perform her duties
to the satisfaction of the City, or if employee fails to fulfill in a timely and professional
manner the obligations under this Contract, or if Employee shall violate any of the terms
of provisions of this Contract, or if Employee has a physical or mental incapacity that
precludes Employee from performing the duties, or if Employee fails to exercise good
behavior in either. during or outside of working hours which is of such a nature that it
causes discredit to the City or impairs her, ability to perform these contract duties, then
the City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon the
City's giving written notice thereof to Employee. Employee shall be paid for all work
satisfactorily completed prior to the effective date of such termination.
9. Entire Agreement and Modification. This Contract constitutes the entire
understanding of the parties hereto, This Contract supersedes all previous contracts,
agreements, negotiations or understandings, whether written or oral, between the parties.
Employee shall be entitled to no other benefits than those specified herein, and
Employee acknowledges that no representations, inducements or promises not contained
in this Contract have been made to Employee to induce Employee to enter into this
Contract. No changes, amendments, or alterations hereto shall be effective unless in
3
writing and signed by both parties. Employee specifically acknowledges that in entering
into and executing this Contract, Employee relies solely upp tJ h e provisions contained
in this Contract and no others.
10. Non - Assignment of-Contract. This Contract is intended to secure the
individual services of the Employee and thus `Employee shall not assign, transfer, .
delegate, or sublet this Contract or any interest therein without the prior written consent
of City, and any such assignment, transfer delegate, or sublet this Contract or any
interest therein.without the prior written consent of .City, and any such assignment,
transfer, delegation, or sublet without the City's prior written consent shall be considered
null and void.
11. Covenant, This Contract has been executed and delivered in the State of
California, and the validity, enforceability and interpretation of any, of the clauses of this
Contract shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. AD -
duties and obligations of the parties created Hereunder are performable in the City of
San Luis Obispo, and such City shall be that venue for any action, or proceeding that
may- be brought, or arise out of, in connection with or. by reason of the. Contract.
12. Nondiscrimination. There shall be no discrimination against any person
employed pursuant to this contract in any manner forbidden by law.
13. Conflicts of Interest The employee shall not participate in any decision .
related to this Contract which affects her personal interest or the interest of any
corporation, partnership, or association in which she is directly or indirectly interested.
14. o ht. Any reports, maps, documents or other materials produced in
whole or part under this Contract shall be the property of the City and shall not be
subject to an application for copyright by or on behalf of Employee, without the prior
4
i
written approval of the City.
15. Outside Employment:. Conduct and Behavior.
a. Employee may engage in outside activities such as part=time teaching,
consulting, or in other similar activities unrelated to City business only with the express
prior approval of the City Administrative Officer.
b. Employee shall comply with all local and state requirements regarding
conflicts -of- interest and. shall avoid personal involvement in situations which are
inconsistent or incompatible with the position of BIA Administrator or give rise to the
appearance of impropriety.
16. Enforceability. If any terms, covenant, condition or provision of this
agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or
unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions herein shall remain in full force and effect
and shall in no way be affected,. impaired or invalidated thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Employee have executed this Contract on the
day and year first hereinabove set forth.
5
ATTEST:
BY:
CITA CLERKI PAM OGES
CONCUR:
*ktto /
Finance Director
& RA 0
Personnel Director
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BY; -Ag%9!1PD
EMPLO)tEiri,
C
LYNN M. BLOCK
4726 Sixth
Los Osos, CA 93402
(805) 528 -6940
PROFESSIONAL OBJECTIVE Using my marketing, management, human resource, and educational
expertise to assist in creating a dynamic, innovative environment while
pursuing corporate goals.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA.
MAY 1986 - Present College of Business Administration, Masters in Business Administration, em-
phasis in Marketing and Finance. Coursework including Marketing, Manage-
ment, Marketing Research, Financial Accounting, and International Finance.
Graduate Project: Marketing Research analysis of designer Liz Claiborne.
Grade Point: 3.9 (Possible 4.0)
AUGUST 1981 - MAY 1985 University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
Bachelors in Business Education, degree Marketing Education. Coursework
including: Advertising, Retailing, Marketing, Business Communication,
Accounting, Business Law, Economics I, II, & III.
Grade Point: 3.7 (Possible 4.0)
SPECIAL SKILLS:
Communication • Perceptive, analytical viewpoint in working with people from diverse
cultures
• Excellent written and oral presentation skills
• Excellent understanding and ability to deal with people on a subordinate
and colleague level.
• Outstanding ability to use networking to obtain effective results
Technical Expertise • Advanced skill level in fiscal areas including: budgeting, account
management, project development and accountability.
• Computer Literacy in WordPerfect, Framework, AppleWorks, MacWrite,
Multiplan, LOTUS 1 -2 -3, and other databased and spreadsheet packages.
• Excellent research ability with experienced analysis and direct
application of result.
Business • Ability to conduct a full scale market research study using computer
analysis
• Practical application of marketing strategies to corporate results
• Excellent internal and external corporate image building skills
• Excellent understanding of business law, finance, and management
techniques currently used by major corporations worldwide.
EXPERIENCE: Northwest Training Executive, CHANEL INC., San Francisco, CA
MARCH 1990 - Present Responsibilities: educating all sales staff on product information, marketing
strategies, and selling techniques; organizing all educational seminars for
the Northwestern states; creating public relation events for regional sales
force; preparing budgets, reports, seminar evaluations, and in -store analysis;
and attending corporate managerial seminars.
EXPERIENCE: Professor of Merchandising, Modesto Jul or College, Modesto, CA
AUGUST 1989 - March 1990 Responsibilities: providing educational opportunities for students in the areas
of marketing, promotion, modeling, product knowledge, and origins of
fashion; producing special events for student and industry sponsored.
projects; presenting workshops on fashion designers, wardrobing, and
professional imaging to Northern California businesses; organizing tours of
major regional fashion centers, and coordinating'intemship experiences with
industry representatives and students.
AUGUST 1985 - AUGUST 1989 Marketing Instructor, Modesto City Schools, Modesto; CA
Responsibilities: providing instruction in business ownership, financial systems,
operations, mathematics, textiles and fabrics, promotion, visual merchon-
dising, human relations, communication, marketing, job seeking skills, and
management; job development for students: supervision of field trips;
coordination of fashion shows; recruitment for program; development and
revision of curriculum; organization of advisory committee; and
development of rogram budgets.
AUGUST 1985 - AUGUST 1989 . Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) Advisor,
Modesto City Schools, Modesto, CA
Responsibilities: preparing students for competition, raising funds for travel
expenses, developing promotional material, writing news releases, coordinating
chapter and individual written events, supervising students, and participating
in conferences.
AUGUST 1987 - Present Marketing Representative, California State Department of Education, Marketing
Education Division. Responsibilities: curriculum development for use in the Model
Curriculum Standards and Program Framework including writing proficiency tests
and instructional activities for use statewide; presenter at the Marketing
Education Conference in the area of Fashion Merchandising curriculum and
instructional techniques, and lecturer for the Central Valley on implementation
of new curriculum.
HONORS AND ACHIEVEMENTS:
Professional: a Who's Who Award for Excellence in California Business Education
e Outstanding Achievement, DECA Advisor 1988
e Certificate of Recognition, for Event Chair, 1987 -89 Stanislaus County
Occupational Olympics and Career Exposition, Selling
e Certificate of Appreciation, for Event Chair, 1987 -88 California
Association Career Development Conference, Apparel and Accessories
e California State Teaching Credential, Single Subjects Business
e California Community College Credential, Business and Industrial
Management, Marketing and Distribution
Post- Graduate: Honor Student, California State University, Stanisiaus
Under - Graduate- Alumni. Award for Excellence, Marketing Education
Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society
Phi Eta Sigma Honor Society
Mentor's Program
Mortar Board Society
Dean's List (4 years)
SPECIAL ACHIEVEMENTS: ?'roduction of a fashion show featuring f, ick Kelly and Roberto Robledos
designs
e Coordination of a presentation for Patrick Kelly for the Sew Workshop, San
Francisco, CA
• Production of "Fall Finesse" fashion show Vintage Faire Mall
• Production Assistant for Gala Fashion Show for Giovanna Ferrari
Specialty Boutique, Stockton, CA
CIVIC CONTRIBUTIONS: Chairperson, Muscular Dystrophy Association Executive Rip-Off 1986 -88
Author, POP: NEW FACE FOR MARKETING, Balance Sheet 1988
Member of the California Association of Regional Occupational Programs
REFERENCES: Leo Schuber, ROP Director, STM Counties
801 County Center Three, Modesto, CA 95355 (209) 525 -5093
Dr. Rhonda Mack, Marketing Professor CSU, Stanislaus
801 W. Monte Vista, Turlock, CA 93580 (209) 667 -3111
Dr. John Holup
University of Idaho, Dept. of Vocational Education .
Moscow, lD 83843 (208) 885 -6556
Dr. Peter Van den Dool, Finance Professor CSU, Stanislaus
801 W.. Monte Vista, Turlock, CA 95380 (209) 667 -3111
a
il
RESOLUTION NO. 6 9 9 5 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY CLERK
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among other positions, the City Clerk
in the Managerial Compensation Plan for Appointed Officials (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series): and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the City Clerk under Section
5 of the Managerial Compensation Plan and the Appointed Officials Process Plan for Appointed Officials
(Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series): and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6823 (1990 Series), the City Council established compensation for City
Clerk Pamela Voges:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Effective April 11, 1991, the City Clerk's salary shall increase from $4,300 per month
to $4,520 per month.
SECTION 2. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City Clerk under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series), and the City Clerk Employment Agreement
(Resolution No. 6172 - 1987 Series), not superseded by the above, shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the City Clerk annually.
On motion of Councilman Reiss
and on the following roll call vote:
, seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
R 6995
I�
1� J
Resolution No. 6 9 9 5 (1991 Series)
Page 2
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of July , 1991.
A'
CLERK PAM
APPROVED:
a!Y [native Officer
ty E or y
Finance Director
Personnel Director
YOR R0 DUN
�VIJ�.
�1 h�
E
RESOLUTION NO. 6 9 9 4 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among other positions, the City
Attorney in the Managerial Compensation Plan for Appointed Officials (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6689 (1989 Series), the City Council appointed Jeff Jorgensen as City
Attorney, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the City Attorney under Section
5 of the Managerial Compensation Plan and the Appointed Officials Process Plan for Appointed Officials
(Resolution No. 6604 - 1989); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6822 (1990 Series), the City Council established compensation for City
Attorney.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Effective April 11, 1991, the City Attorney's salary shall increase from $6,000 per month
to $6,300 per month.
SECTION 2. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City Attorney under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series), and the City Attorney Employment
Agreement (Resolution 6689 - 1989 Series) not superseded by the above, shall remain in full force and effect
with the following modification: In the event Mr. Jorgensen's employment is terminated by the Council during
such time that he is willing and able to perform the duties of City Attorney the City agrees to pay him a
lump sum cash payment equal to four (4) months compensation (salary and all appointed officials fringe
benefits). Should Mr. Jorgensen obtain employment during the four month period following termination, he
shall reimburse the City proportionately.
SECTION 3. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the City Attorney annually.
R 6994
Resolution No. 6 9 9 4 (1991 Series)
Page 2
On motion of Councilman Reiss seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa., Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of July, 1991
ATTEST:
C CLERK P OGES
APPROVED:
City A
City Attor ey ( t4jj �4)
F"mahce Director
U WA,-
Personnel Director
OR RO DUNIN
0
RESOLUTION NO. 6 9 9 3 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among other positions, the City
Administrative Officer in the Managerial Compensation Plan for Appointed Officials (Resolution No. 6604 -
1989 Series): and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6198 (1987 Series), the City Council appointed John Dunn as City
Administrative Officer, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the City Administrative Officer
under Section 5 of the Managerial Compensation Plan and the Appointed Officials Process Plan for Appointed
Officials (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series):
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6817 - 1990 Series, the City Council established compensation for City
Administrative Officer John Dunn.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Effective April 11, 1991, the City Administrative Officer's salary shall increase from
$6,900 per month to $7,300 per month.
SECTION 2. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City Administrative Officer under
the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series), and the City Administrative
Officer Employment Agreement (Resolution No. 6198 - 1987 Series) not superseded by the above, shall
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 3. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the City Administrative Officer
annually.
On motion of Councilman Reiss , seconded by Councilwoman Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa;_-,Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilwoman Pinard
R 6994
Resolution No. 6 9 9 3 (1991 Series)
Page 2
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this
ATTEST:
L), U/'
CITY OLERK PAM GES
APPROVED:
City Ad ' ' trative Officer
w 9
• ��, , /
i
1
(L ( 4Co�u
Personnel Director
2nd day of July, 1991.
N AYOR RON DUNIN
C'
n
l
RESOLUTION NO. 6992
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE 1991 -93 FINANCIAL PLAN
AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR
THE 1991 -92 FISCAL YEAR
WHEREAS, the City Administrative Officer has recommended a comprehensive
Financial Plan for 1991 -93 in accordance with budget policies and objectives established by
the Council; and
WHEREAS, the 1991 -93 Financial Plan is based upon public comment and direction
of the Council after scheduled budget study sessions and hearings held between November
7, 1990 and June 18, 1991.
that:
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
Section 1. The 1991 -93 Financial Plan is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Operating, Debt Service, and Capital Outlay Budget for the Fiscal
Year beginning July 1, 1991 and ending June 30, 1992 is hereby appropriated in the amount
of $43,626,300 as follows:
Operating Program $29,505,700
Capital Outlay 11,567,500
Debt Service 2,553,100
TOTAL $43,626,300
R 6992
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,seconded by Councilman Roalman
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT :Councilmembers Pinard and Reiss
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of June
1991. —
ayor To n Dunin
A S
City Clerk Pam V t s
APPROVED:
A WA
A:91-93FP4b \Resolutn.NPF
RESOLUTION 6991. (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING FUNDING TO FIFTEEN AGENCIES
IN THE AMOUNT OF $78,531 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92
THROUGH THE PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo supports non - profit
agencies which provide economic, cultural, and recreational
services to the residences of the City of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, in the past, the City has authorized and distributed
Grants -In -Aid funding to community organizations which provide
economic, cultural, and recreational services; and
WHEREAS, funding for the Grants -In -Aid program has been
included in the 1991 -93 Financial Plan for the City of San Luis
Obispo.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agencies attached hereto and marked
Exhibit "A" shall be provided funding as is designated in the same
attachment.
SECTION 2. The staff is directed to prepare a contract for
each agency identified in Exhibit "A" and the CAD is authorized to
execute such contracts. I
Upon motion of Councilman Roalman , seconded
by Councilwoman Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Reiss
R 6991
(A- 66 -91 -CA to A- 80-91'
3
RESOLUTION NO. 6991 ( 1991 SERIES)
Page Two
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this
of
June
or on Dunin
ATTEST:
Lj, -- U.., -
Pame Voges, Cit Clerk
APPROVED:
ohn Dun , City Administrative Officer
y o ns , City Attorney
e \resogia.wp
I
0
18 th day
1991.
EXHIBIT "A"
Agency
Children's Creative Project
$8,000
Pacific Repertory Opera
$3,000
Cuesta College Art Gallery
$4,100
San Luis Vocal Arts Ensemble
$4,000
San Luis Obispo Mozart Festival
$7,000
Arts Council of SLO County
$3,931
San Luis Obispo County Band
$3,200
Music and the Arts for Youth (M.A.Y.)
$3,800
ARTernatives, A Visual Arts Forum
$5,000
San Luis Obispo Art Association
$7,500
SLO County Youth Symphony
$3,500
Cal Poly on behalf of Cal. Poly Arts
$3,500
La Fiesta De San Luis Obispo
$5,000
San Luis Obispo Little Theatre
$10,000
San Luis Obispo County Symphony
$7,000
Total
$78,531
C
RESOLUTION NO. 6990
(;1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. MS 91 -025
LOCATED AT 1239 IRIS STREET AND 1234 GEORGE STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Minor Subdivision MS 91-
025 and the Community Development Director's recommendations,
staff recommendations, and reports thereof, makes the following
findings:
1. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the general
plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the R -.2 zone.
3. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious
health problems, substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with
easements for access through (or use of property within) the
proposed subdivision.
5.. The City Council has determined that the proposed
subdivision will not have a significant effect on the
environment and approves the negative declaration filed by
the Community Development Director.
SECTION 2. Exceptions. Approval of exceptions to allow lot
area of 3,750 square feet where a minimum lot area of 6000 square
feet is normlly required; lot depth of 75 feet where.a minimum of
90 feet is normally required; and a lot width of 50 feet where 60
feet is normally required are hereby approved, based on the
following findings:
R 6990
Resolution No.6990 (1991 Series.)
Minor Subdivision 91 -025
Page 2
1. The'property is such a size and shape that it is undesirable
to conform to the strict application of lot area and
dimension standards.
2. The exceptions will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, nor will they be.injurious to other
properties in the vicinity.
3. The cost to the subdivider of strict compliance with the
standards is not the sole reason for granting the
exceptions.
4. Granting the requested exceptions is consistent with the
intent and purposes.of the Subdivision Regulations, and is
consistent with the General Plan.,
SECTION 3. Conditions: The approval of the tentative map
for MS 91 -025 is subject to the following conditions:
1. Subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for review,
approva_1 and recordation. The map shall be prepared by or
under the supervision of, a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor.
2.. Subdivider shall provide individual electrical, cable
television, and natural gas services and metering for each
unit to the approval of affected public utility agencies and
the City Engineer.
3. Subdivider shall provide individual water- services and sewer
connections for each lot, to the approval of the City
Engineer-.
4. Subdivider shall remove the portion.of the garage building
which encroaches on Lot 2, and /or modify any remaining
portion of the structure within three feet of the property
line to comply with separation requirements of the Uniform
Building Code, to the approval of the Chief Building
Official.
SECTION 4. Code Requirements. The following represent
standard requirements required by various codes, ordinances, and
policies of the City of San Luis Obispo, but are not limited to
the following:
Resolution No. 6990(1991 Series)
Minor Subdivision 91 -025
Page 3
1. Subdivider shall extend the public water main in Iris Street
to the northeasterly boundary of the subdivision, in
accordance with city standards and to the approval of the
City Engineer and the city's Utilities Engineer.
2. Subdivider shall abandon all utility services which cross
the newly created property line, to the approval of the
Chief Building Official.
3. Lot corners shall be staked by a registered civil engineer
or licensed land surveyor.
On motion of Councilman Roalman
seconded by Councilwoman Rappa , and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard.and Reiss
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day
of June , 1991.
ATTEST:
. . Q, "
City tlerk P Voges
Tj
s
ayor unin --
Resolution No. 6990 (1991 Series)
Minor Subdivision 91 -025
Page 4
APPROVED:
-ity KcbnInistr,4Kive ficer
c
1�, p
�r
RESOLUTION NO. 6989 (1991 Series)
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
REGARDING PREPARATION'AND SUBMITTAL OF SOURCE
REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS, HOUSEHOLD
HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT, AND RELATED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
WHEREAS, the Cities and the County of San Luis Obispo have
joined together under a Memorandum of Agreement with the San Luis
Obispo Area Coordinating Council to prepare and adopt Source
.Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRRE's) and Household Hazardous
Waste Element (HHWE) based upon a regional approach; and
WHEREAS, the cities and the County of San Luis Obispo have
begun preparation of Environmental impact Reports (EIR's) on the
proposed Source Reduction and Recycling Elements, and Household
Hazardous Waste Elements; and
WHEREAS, the preparation and adoption of these Environmental
Impact Reports, and associated processing timeframes, will
require that the communities acting together in this effort
continue to meet and confer on the impacts associated with the
proposed programs and facilities that will be required to meet
the demands of AB 939; and
WHEREAS, State Law requires notification of the Integrated
Waste Management Board as to the local jurisdiction's intentions
regarding the nature and timing on local approval of SRRE's,
HHWE, and the associated environmental documentation.
R 6989
,
Resolution No. 6989 (1991 Series)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the San Luis Obispo
Area Coordinating Council, on behalf of the City of San Luis
Obispo and the County of San Luis Obispo, is in the process of
preparing an Environmental Impact Report on the proposed SRRE's
and HHWE's, and will be submitting the required documents to the
Integrated Waste Management Board prior to December i, 1991, or
other statutory deadlines that may be established for the
submittal of plans required by AB 939 and AB 1820 that are
subject to the preparation of EIR's.
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rappa . seconded by Councilman
Roalman and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Pinard and Reiss
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 18th day of June
1991.
YOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST
of
CITY C ERK PAMELA V ES
Public Works Director
srrehhwe /cbfl
J., SCR L�[;v r1 L.iv
7
obiv� �l
`s
I
RESOLUTION NO. 6988 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION
TO THE URBAN FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE,COASTAL, AND PARR LAND
CONSERVATION BOND ACT OF 1988
FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO STREET TREE PLANTING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted
the California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Bond
Act of 1988, which provides money to the State of California and
political subdivisions for urban forestry programs; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection has been delegated the responsibility for
administering the grant program within the State and for setting
up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies
and non - profit organizations under the grant program; and
WHEREAS, the procedures established by the State Department
of Forestry and Fire Protection require applicants to certify by
resolution approval of applications before submittal to the
State; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo will enter into an
agreement with the State of California to carry out its street
tree planting project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo:
1. Approves filing an application to the Urban Forestry Grant
Program under the California Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land
Conservation Bond Act of 1988 for state assistance on the City of
San Luis Obispo Street Tree Planting Project; and
2. Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo has or will have
sufficient money to operate and maintain the project; and
3. Certifies that money under the jurisdiction of the City of
San Luis Obispo is available to begin the project; and
4. ,Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo will spend grant
money before June 30, 1993; and
5. Appoints Lane Wilson, Parks and Buildings Manager, as agent
for the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct all negotiations and
execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to,
applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so
on, which may be necessary to complete the project.
-' 6980'.
a
Resolution No. 698$_ (1991 Series)
page two
Upon motion of Councilman Reiss , seconded by
Councilwoman Pinard , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council ers Reiss, Pinard, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Dtnin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 11th day of June, 1991.
r Mayor Ron Duain
ATT n J L l
P is Voges, Ci Clerk
APPROVED:
�i /i. Lei ✓u� / /
r' ty AdministratAve Officer
Public Works Director
pit,
rvvi
t
RESOLUTION NO. 6987 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPDATING THE CITY'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is committed to the
concept of Equal Employment Opportunity as a basic principle that
all persons shall be given equal access and consideration to
positions i:n the public service limited only by their ability and
qualifications to do the job, and
I
WHEREAS, Equal Employment Opportunity can best be achieved
through definitive programmed affirmative action, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has had an Affirmative
Action Program since 1979,
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT
RESOLVED, the City
Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo
hereby
adopts the updated
Affirmative Action
Plan, attached hereto marked Exhibit A and incorporated herein by
reference, and rescinds Resolution No. 3815 (1979 Series).
Resolution No. 6987 (1991 Series)
Upon motion of Councilman Roalman , seconded by Councilwoman
Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT :None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 4th day of June, 1991.
mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
Ur
Pam ges, Cit Clerk
City dministrative Officer
i t o y
Ae nc, Person el Director
C
RESOLUTION6986(1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING FUNDING TO TWENTY -SEVEN AGENCIES
IN THE AMOUNT OF $82,400 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92
THROUGH THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo supports non - profit
agencies which provide human and social services to the residents
of the City of San Luis Obispo through its annual Grants -In -Aid
process; and
WHEREAS, funding for the Human Relations Commission Grants-
In -Aid program has been included in the 1991 -93 Financial Plan for
the City of San Luis Obispo;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agencies attached hereto and marked
Exhibit "A" shall be provided funding as is designated in the same
attachment.
SECTION 2. The staff is directed to prepare a contract for
each agency identified in Exhibit "A" and the CAO is authorized to
execute such contracts.
Upon motion of Mayor Dunin , seconded by —
Councilman Reiss and on the following roll call vote:.
AYES: Mayor Dunin, Councilmembers Reiss, Pinard, Rappa, and Roalman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 4th 'day of
June , 1991.
R 6986
(s -11_01 ... __
4
Resolution No. 6986 (1991 SERIES)
Page Two
Ron min
ATTEST:
Pam oges, Ci Clerk
APPROVED:
John D , City Administrative Officer
DH \gia.rpt
LY
i
Attorney
Exhibit "A"
TOTAL $82,400
DH \gia.rpt
Recommendation
AGENCY
1991 -92
Ad Care Association
$ 2,000
ALPHA
1,000
American Red Cross
5,000
RSVP
800
Caring Callers
450
Camp Fire Girls
1,000
Casa Solana
4,500,
Child Development Center
7,500
Easter Seals
1,200,
EOC Family Planning
3,000
EOC Senior Health Screening
2,700-
EOC Community Partners in Child Care
500
EOC Child Care Connection
500
Family Services Center
4,000,
Food Bank Coalition
1,000
4-H Youth Program
1,000
Grass Roots II
3,450.
Hospice
4,200
Hotline
3,100
Literacy Council
2,500
Long Term Care Ombudsman
1,500
Mental Health Association
4,000
National Council on Alcoholism
1,000
Rape Crisis
5,500
Salvation Army
12,500
Women's Shelter
8,000
Poly Pals
500
TOTAL $82,400
DH \gia.rpt
v �
11S,hIL1' •,f/
�v4
C
u
m
I
RESOLUTION NO. 6985 (1991 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ESTABLISHING AN EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to recognize employees who make suggestions which
contribute to more efficient and effective City operations, and
WHEREAS, an Employee Suggestion Award Policy is designed to encourage employees
to take and active and integral part in improving City operations, and
WHEREAS, an Employee Suggestion Award Program defines a process for
recognizing and. rewarding such employees, and
WHEREAS, the employees of the City of San Luis Obispo have reviewed and endorsed an
Employee Suggestion Program and are committed to participating, and
WHEREAS, the success of such a program can best be measured by the level of savings
realized which shall be analyzed through a comprehensive review of the program by the City
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo does hereby establish the Employee Suggestion Award Program to become effective
July 1, 1991 and will comprehensively review the program in June of 1993.
Upon motion of Councilman Roalman seconded by Councilwoman RaDna and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R 6985
Resolution No. 6985 (1991 Series)
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 4th
Resolution No.
ATTEST:
Pam Voc bs,
APPROVED:
(1991 Series)
day of .Tune , 1991.
Mayor yo Ron Dunin
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD PROGRAM
POLICY
It is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo to recognize employees who make
noteworthy suggestions which contribute to more efficient and effective City operations.
Employees whose suggestions have been reviewed by the Suggestion Review
Committee and approved by the City Administrative Officer will be appropriately
recognized as provided for in this policy statement. The Employee Suggestion Award
Program, as described in the following outline, is designed to encourage employees to
take an active and integral part in improving City operations. The program shall
become effective July 1, 1991 and be comprehensively reviewed by the City Council by
June 30, 1993.
PROGRAM PROCEDURES
L Eli ibili Any employee, whether regular, part-time, temporary, or under
contract, is eligible to submit suggestions for consideration. The Management
Team is ineligible.
II. Eligible Suggestions: Any suggestion which accomplishes one or .more of the
following objectives is eligible for consideration:
a. The saving of time, money, labor, materials, or supplies.
b. An improvement in the quality of a specific public service.
C. An improvement in methods and procedures which results in increased
efficiency.
d. The elimination of unnecessary and costly procedures which results in
time, labor, or material savings.
III. Ineligible Suggestions: Some suggestions are not appropriate for review by the
Suggestion Review Committee and are not eligible for awards. Examples of
such ineligible suggestions are:
1. Suggestions dealing with "housekeeping" matters such as routine repair
1
and maintenance.
2. Suggestions that. point out problems without offering solutions.
3. Proposals in the nature of grievances, salary adjustments or matters within
the scope of employee /employer relations.
4. Proposals for minor improvements in working conditions that the employee
or immediate supervisor can correct through normal or customary action.
IV. Suggestion Review Committee: The Suggestion Review Committee shall consist
of one representative from each City department, and the Program Coordinator.
All appointments to the Committee, including that of the Program Coordinator,
shall be made by the City Administrative Officer, and shall be for a term of two
years. The Committee shall be representative of all levels of employees in the
organization.
The Committee will meet as necessary to act as a screening and review body
for all properly submitted suggestions: The Committee may solicit advice or
technical assistance as needed.
The functions of the Committee shall be as follows:
a. To review and assess- all properly- submitted suggestions.
b. To receive input and advice from all departments affected by a given
suggestion.
C. To determine if' a suggestion should be or has already been adopted.
d. To review and assess possible and actual cost savings.
V. Proaram Coordinator: The Program Coordinator, appointed by the City
Administrative Officer, shall administer the program and all of its rules_ and
regulations. Specific responsibilities of the Coordinator include:
a. To receive, acknowledge, and process suggestions.
b. To assist the Suggestion Review Committee in obtaining needed
information.
C. To maintain all program files and records.
F
d. To record actions and decisions which are made by the Suggestion
Review Committee.
e. To notify employees of the Committee's recommendations.
f. To prepare all necessary Committee communications to the CAO, the City
Council, and City employees..
VI. Procedure for Submitting Suggestion : Suggestion proposals must contain the
following essential information:
a. A brief description of the present method, operation, or problem.
b. What exactly the suggestion aims to accomplish.
C. How the suggestion will affect City operations.
d. Who or what department is affected, and who will gain or benefit from the
suggestion's implementation.
e. How the suggestion could be implemented, including descriptive materials,
drawings, and /or photographs.
f. The estimated cost of implementing the suggestion, and the probable first
year savings to the City.
The employee's signature, address and telephone number should be included
Suggestions may be submitted jointly by more than one employee. The
signatures of all relevant employees must be included in the proposal.
Employees should use their own- materials, resources, and time to the greatest
extent. possible when preparing suggestions.
All suggestions should be submitted on a Suggestion Award Submittal Form to:
Program Coordinator
Employee Suggestion Award Program
City of San Luis Obispo
P.O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, California 93403
3
VII: Analysis and Awards: The suggestion will be forwarded to the affected
department and every effort will be made to maintain confidentiality. The
department will provide comments on the suggestion within 30 days which will
be reviewed by the Suggestion Review Committee at the next regularly scheduled
meeting. The employee will be notified of the committee meeting, date and time.
The Suggestion Review Committee shall determine the merit of the suggestion
and, if there is a net savings to the City, the Committee shall recommend an
appropriate award to the CAO who has final approval.
All adopted suggestions will receive awards. The awards will be presented by
the City Council at a regular Council Meeting.
a. Cash awards will be made for suggestions which result in a tangible one-
time savings of $500.00 or more per year. The award shall consist of 10%
of the first year's estimated net savings, with a maximum award of $2,500.
All cash awards are subject to state and federal income tax deductions.
A certificate of commendation shall also be presented, and placed in the
employee's personnel file. The CAO can approve awards that exceed the
$2,500 limit where an approved suggestion results in extraordinary cost
savings to the City.
b. A cash award of $25 and a certificate of commendation will be given to
an employee, and a copy placed in his /her personnel file, for suggestions
which result in City savings of $500 or less.
C. An employee may specify an alternative award such as additional time off
subject to CAO approval.
4
uUGGESTION AWARD SUBMITTAL. jRM
Please complete and return to: Program Coordinator
Employee Suggestion Award Program
City of San Luis Obispo
P.O. Box 8100 -
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
EXISTING METHOD OR CONDITION:
SUGGESTION:
AFFECTED DEPARTMENTS AND /OR INDIVIDUALS:
ADVANTAGES OF SUGGESTION:
IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE:
ESTIMATED START -UP COSTS:
ESTIMATED COST SAVING_ S -
INITIAL YEAR: -- PER YEAR THEREAFTER:
Attach additional papas 11 necessary and Include description of materiels.. drawings and or photographs.
NAME: DEPARTMENT:
TELEPHONE: JOB TITLE:
The City of San Luis Obispo is hereby granted full rights to use this suggestion.
Employee, Signature Date
CITY. OF SAN LUIS OBISPO --
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD PROGRAM
GUIDELINES
Suggestions which accomplish any of the following are eligible:
1. The saving of money, time, labor, material, or supplies.
2. Improvement in the quality of a specific public service:
3.. An improvement in methods and procedures which results in increased efficiency.
4. The elimination of unnecessary and costly procedures which results in time, labor
or material savings.
Types of suggestions that are ineligible:
1. Suggestions dealing with "housekeeping" matters such as routine repair and
maintenance.
2. Suggestions that point out problems without offering solutions.
3. Proposals 'in the nature of grievances, salary adjustments or matters within the
scope of employee /employer relations.
4. Proposals for minor improvements in working conditions that the employee or
immediate supervisor can correct through normal or customary action.
PLEASE NOTE: Your suggestion will be .forwarded to the affected department and
every effort will be made to maintain confidentiality; The department will provide
comments on your suggestion within 30 days which will be reviewed by the Suggestion
Review Committee at their next regularly scheduled meeting. You will be notified of the
committee meeting, date and time.
Thank you for thinking creatively to develop ideas that result in tangible benefits to the
City, cut costs, improve s_ ervice, increase efficiency and eliminate safety and health
hazards.
RETURN TO:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION AWARD PROGRAM
ATTENTION :, PROGRAM COORDINATOR
P.O. BOX 8100
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 -8100
CONFIDENTIAL
� J
so
d ��
RESOLUTION NO. 6984 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
.AMENDING THE BY -LAWS OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION BY CHANGING THE
MEETING TIME FROM 7:00 P.M. TO 5:30 P.M. ON
THE FIRST WEDNESDAY OF EVERY MONTH
WHEREAS, the advisory body handbook stipulates that each
advisory body shall have by- laws, and that each body shall submit
changes for Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission has reviewed its by-
laws and wishes to change the meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 5:30
p.m. the first Wednesday of every month.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City.of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
1. That the amended by -laws of the Human Relations Commission are
hereby approved and adopted.
2. That the Human Relations Commission meetings will be held on
the first Wednesday of every month at 5:30 p.m.
On motion of
Councilwoman Rappa
Councilman Roalman
seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this
June , 1991.
4th day of
R 6984
C:
Page Two - Resolution No. 6984(1991 SERIES)
ATTEST:
-
citl Clerk P0 Voges
H
APPROVED:
,,e e-05 �- Z?s�,
City AAmirKsteative offic6ef
bylaw2.hrc
ayor Ron D u n i n
C1
BY -LAWS
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE
It is the purpose of the Human Relations Commission to advise the Council in its
actions to create an environment within the city in which all persons can enjoy equal
rights and opportunities regardless of race, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical,
mental or economic status. The Human Relations Commission shall make
recommendations to the City Council or the City Administrative Officer on how these
social concerns and human needs can best be addressed.
ARTICLE 2. TERMS OF OFFICE
Commissioners shall be appointed by the City Council for terms of four (4) years,
commencing on April 1. Commissioners shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council.
Any Commissioner may be reappointed, provided that no appointee shall serve more
than two (2) consecutive terms (8 years).
ARTICLE 3. MEETINGS
A. The Commission shall hold a regular meeting each month but not less than ten
(10) times a year.
B. Meetings will be held at 7:ee p.m.. 5:30 p.m. the first Wednesday of each month.
C. The Commission meetings shall be open to the public and shall be held at City
Hall or other previously announced locations at specific times as required by
California law.
D. A quorum shall consist of a majority of the Commissioners currently serving.
E. All actions of the Commission shall be decided by a majority vote or consensus
and shall be directed through the Commission Chair.
F. Minutes of each meeting shall be forwarded to the City Council and be available
as a public record.
G. The Chairperson or any three members of the Commission may call a special
meeting providing a week's prior notice is given in writing to each member.
H. All Commission meetings shall be conducted according to Robert's Rules of
Order.
I. All members present must vote, except when abstaining due to a declared
conflict of interest.
J. Any member with a declared conflict of interest shall not vote on or participate
in any discussion of any item or in any manner, attempt to influence the decision
on that item.
ARTICLE 4. SUBCOMMITTEES
Subcommittees consisting of less than a quorum of the Commission shall be appointed,
as needed, by the Chairperson. Study committees may include non - commission
members who shall have no voting power.
ARTICLE 5. OFFICERS
A. The officers shall be a Chairperson and a Vice - Chairperson who shall be elected
at the Commission meeting in April for one -year terms.
B. The Chairperson shall preside over all meetings of the Commission, prepare all
meeting agendas and perform such duties as directed by the Commission.
C. The Vice- Chairperson shall serve in the absence or incapacity of the Chairperson.
ARTICLE 6. WORKPLAN
The Commission shall develop a workplan on an annual basis. The workplan shall be
a description of the activities that will be undertaken in order to meet the goals and
objectives of the Commission.
ARTICLE 7. AMENDMENTS
By -law amendments shall be submitted for Council approval by an affirmative vote. of
the members present at a regular meeting of the Commission, provided that such
amendments shall have been discussed by the Commission on the agenda of at least
two meetings prior to the vote. The members shall receive the proposed amendments
in writing at least ten (10) days prior to the first reading.
e:bylaw.hrc
sy"
i
C'
} "1
RESOLUTION NO. 6983 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
CONCERNING PROCESSING OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS
FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS
WHEREAS, the council has initiated a comprehensive review and
revision'of the general plan land use and circulation elements, as
provided in the city financial plan and work program, which was
originally expected to be completed early in 1991; and
WHEREAS, the update of those elements has taken longer than
originally anticipated for a variety of reasons including a council
directive to prepare an analysis to evaluate potential economic
impacts associated with the general plan update prior to the
adoption of individual elements; and
WHEREAS, it is now anticipated that the update of the general
plan land use and circulation elements will not be completed until
sometime in 1993; and
WHEREAS, there are .pending proposals for general plan
amendments for properties located within the urban 'reserve that
are consistent with the Draft Land Use Element and have been in the
planning stages for several years; and
WHEREAS, delaying processing of all general plan amendments
outside the city limits as described in City Council Resolution No.
6659 adopted August 1, 1989 is not necessarily in the interest of
comprehensive planning goals given delays in the general plan land
use and circulation elements update previously described; and
6983
i
WHEREAS, it would still not be appropriate to consider general
plan amendments for areas outside of the urban reserve until the
general plan land use and circulation elements update is completed
because of the large land areas involved and the greater potential
for negative impacts on comprehensive planning efforts; and
WHEREAS, the council finds that establishing this policy is
not a project for purposes of environmental review; and
WHEREAS, the council on May 21, 1991, held a public hearing
and considered public testimony and the report and recommendation
of staff; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the council resolves that requests to amend
the general plan Land Use Element map involving areas outside the
urban reserve will not be considered at public hearings before a
new Land Use Element is adopted. The only exception to this
provision would be that the EIR for the Irish Hill Golf
Course/ Homes ites project could be considered for certification
prior to the Land Use Element update since it was underway prior
to adoption of Resolution No. 6659. General plan amendments
involving annexations within the urban reserve, as shown on the
Land Use Element Map in effect on the date of this resolution, may
be processed prior to completion of the Land Use Element update.
This policy will apply to all pending applications and any
applications which may be received before adoption of the Land Use
Element update. Resolution No. 6659 is hereby superseded and
repealed.
On motion of Co ncilmember Penny Rappa seconded
by Councilmember Jerry Reiss and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Council P Rappa and Reiss, and Mayor Dimin
NOES: C L=ilnembers Pinard, Roalman.-
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day of
May , 1991.
ATTEST:
APPROVEb:
City - Off .-
Mayor, Ran Dimin
I
I
COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 6982 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION
DENYING THE DEMOLITION OF A HOUSE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A.
NEW OFFICE AT 1533 HIGUERA STREET (ARC 90 -134).
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION .1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the appellants' application and
plans for demolition of a house and the construction of a new
office at 1533 Higuera Street (ARC 90 =134), the appellants'
statements, the Architecture Review Commission's action, and staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The :proposed office building is inconsistent with the
pattern and spacing of neighborhood buildings, since it is
setback almost 90 feet from the street with parking in
front, instead of the 20 to 30 foot setbacks with parking
in.the rear, typical for the neighborhood;
2. The proposed office's architectural design is inappropriate
at this location' since it is :not compatible with the
neighborhood's prevailing character, and emphasizes the
building's office /commercial use by using forms, details
and materials not usually associated with residential
neighborhoods.
3. This project. is likely to irreversibly alter and detract
from the neighborhood's established architectural
character.
4. The proposed project is not consistent with Architectural
Review commission policies encouraging new office
development to be architecturally compatible with
neighboring residential development.
6982
r
COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 6982 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION
DENYING THE DEMOLITION OF A HOUSE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A.
NEW OFFICE AT 1533 HIGUERA STREET (ARC 90 -134).
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION .1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the appellants' application and
plans for demolition of a house and the construction of a new
office at 1533 Higuera Street (ARC 90 =134), the appellants'
statements, the Architecture Review Commission's action, and staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The :proposed office building is inconsistent with the
pattern and spacing of neighborhood buildings, since it is
setback almost 90 feet from the street with parking in
front, instead of the 20 to 30 foot setbacks with parking
in.the rear, typical for the neighborhood;
2. The proposed office's architectural design is inappropriate
at this location' since it is :not compatible with the
neighborhood's prevailing character, and emphasizes the
building's office /commercial use by using forms, details
and materials not usually associated with residential
neighborhoods.
3. This project. is likely to irreversibly alter and detract
from the neighborhood's established architectural
character.
4. The proposed project is not consistent with Architectural
Review commission policies encouraging new office
development to be architecturally compatible with
neighboring residential development.
6982
a
Resolution No. 6982
On motion of Coimcilmerber Bill Roalman
seconded by Counci}menber Jerry Reiss , and on the following roll
call vote:
i
AYES: Council members Roalman, Reiss, and Pinard
NOES: Council er Rappa and Mayor Dumin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day
of . May , 1991.
iffyor Ron Dunin
A7:TJ5 f
V
City jClerk
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
IWO
Iffid, . .
"�pment Director
3
G
r
VV
�J�;I
RESOLUTION NO. 6981
(1991 .. Series)
ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT FEES FOR INDUSTRIAL USERS
OF THE CITY WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEMS
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State
of California, Regional Water Quality Control (RWQCB)
require the City to establish and 'operate an Industrial
Pretreatment Program to control and monitor industrial discharge
to the City's wastewater treatment systems, and
WHEREAS, the City has established a pretreatment program that
complies with the State and Federal requirements as defined in
Part 403 of the Code of Federal Regulations(CFR), and
WHEREAS, CFR 403.8(f)(3) requires the City to have sufficient
resources (funding and. personnel) to carry out the requirements
of the program., and
WHEREAS, 13.08.250 of the City Municipal Code provides the legal
authority to establish a system of charges and.fees, and
WHEREAS, the cost of the pretreatment program directly
attributable to the industrial users shall be equitably
distributed to the industrial users through a system of
industrial user permit fees which reflect the actual demands
placed on the program by each classification of industrial user.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo does hereby adopt the following schedule of
Industrial. User Permit Fees:
1. Significant and Categorical Users
Annual Permit Fees ............ 680.00
2. Class 1 Users Annual Permit Fees ......$ 210.00
3. Class 2 Users Annual Permit Fees ......$ 64.00
4. Monthly Compliance Monitoring, sampling and
Follow -up Inspections for Noncompliance /Violations
to be billed at the hourly rates established in
the Public Works Department "Labor and Equipment
- Rates" document.
5. Annual permit fees to become effective and due
July 1, 1991 with the proportionate amount
included with the City's bi- monthly utility
billing.
MOW
Resolution No. 6981 (1991 Series)
Couccilmember i Councilmenber
Upon motion of Bill Roalman_ -. - seconded bye R =a ,
and on the following roll call voter
AYES:.Counci]members Roa]man, Rappa, Pinard, and Reiss
NOES: Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 21 day of May ,
1991.
ATTEST:
P1.0ow V
Pam Viges, City & erk
APPROVED:
City dministrative officer
C' y J to ne r/
City Finance Director
City Utilities Director
Mayor Ron Dunin
qN,
RESOLUTION NO. 6980 (1991 Series)
DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE EXISTS AT
663 CHURCH STREET
AND TO ABATE IN WHOLE OR IN PART
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON the 21 of May , 1991, at the
hour of 7:00 g.m. , the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo held a public hearing in the
Council Chambers of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California and determined a
public nuisance exists upon certain premises situated in said City known and designated as
663 Church Street and more particularly described as Lot 8, Block 124, Murray and Church's
addition, and shown as Assessor's Parcel No. 003- 641 -003 in the Office of the San Luis Obispo
County Recorder.
The Council fords upon the evidence presented at the hearing that a public nuisance does exist,
and if the same is not promptly abated by the owner of said premises, within 30 days from this
date, said nuisance may be abated by municipal authorities by rehabilitation, repair, demolition,
removal, or other appropriate action, the cost of which will constitute a lien upon such premises
until paid.
The alleged nuisance consists of the following: boxes, debris, wood, cut vegetation, and any
other combustible material deemed a hazard by the authority having jurisdiction.
Councilmember Councilmeriber
Jon motion of Bili Rnninign seconded by Penny &Qpa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmenbers Roalnm, Rappa, Pinard, P,eiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day of UU ,
1991.
Me]
Resolution No. 6980 (1991 Series)
Page 2
,Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
V
Pam Voges, City Plqrk
APPROVED:
City Ad ' 'strative Officer
VA 01
j ���Wi�rINIAAM
n
cod
G
4.F
AGF=Tr NO. A- 29 -91 -CC ,� �s- ; 7 �
EXHIBIT 1
CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This agreement, made this 8th day of May , 1991, by
and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, California (hereinafter
referred to as "City "), and -- TECHNICAL ANALYSIS CORPORATION
(hereinafter referred to as "Consultant").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City desires to retain certain services in
conjunction with environmental review for upgrading the main
water treatment plant in Stenner Canyon. The services being
provided by Consultant under this contract are preparation of
draft and final environmental impacts reports pursuant to C.EQ.A
and.the city's Environmental Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, City desires to engage Consultant to provide
services by reason of its qualifications and experience for
performing such services, and Consultant.has offered to provide
the required services on the terms and in the manner set forth
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PROJECT COORDINATION
a. City.. The Community Development Director shall be the
representative of the city for all purposes under this
agreement. The director, or his designated
representative, Glen Matteson, Associate Planner,
hereby is designated as the Project Manager for the
City. He shall supervise the progress and execution of
this agreement.
b. Consultant. Consultant shall assign a single Project
Manager to have overall responsibility for the progress
and execution of this agreement for Consultant. Don
H. Beckham _ is hereby designated as the Project
Manager for Consultant. Should circumstances or
conditions subsequent to the execution of this
agreement require a substitute Project Manager for any
reason, the Project Manager designee shall be subject
to the prior written acceptance and approval of City's
project manager: Consultants Project Team is further
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference. The individuals
identified and the positions held as described in.
.Exhibit "A" shall not be changed except by prior
approval of City.
A- 29 -91 =CC
609
Consultant Services Agreement 2
Water Treatment Plant EIR
2. DUTIES OF CONSULTANT
a. Services to be furnished. Consultant shall ;provide all
specified services as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
b. Ouality Control. All instruments of service shall
reflect.high standards of professional research,
.analysis, and written and graphic communication.
City's project manager shall be responsible for
evaluating quality of work and for the issuance of
consultant payments upon satisfactory delivery,
completion, and city acceptance of work.
C. Laws to be observed. Consultant shall:
(1) Procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges
and fees, and give all notices which may be
necessary and incidental to the due and lawful
prosecution of the services to be performed by
Consultant under this agreement;
(2) Keep itself fully informed of all existing and
proposed federal, state and local_ laws,
ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees which
may affect those engaged or employed under this
agreement, any materials used in Consultant's
performance under this agreement, or the conduct
of the services under this agreement;
(3) At all times observe and comply with, and cause
all of its employees to observe and comply with
all of said laws, ordinances, regulations, orders,
and decrees mentioned above.
(4) Immediately report to the City's Project Manager
in writing any discrepancy or inconsistency it
discovers in said laws, ordinances, regulations,
orders, and decrees mentioned above in relation to
any plans, drawings, specifications, or provisions
of this agreement.
d. Release of reports and information. Any reports,
information, data, or other material given to, or
prepared or assembled by,.Consultant under this
Agreement shall be the property of City and shall not
be made available to any individual or organization by
Consultant without the prior written approval of the
City's Project Manager.
Consultant Services Agreement 3
Water Treatment Plant EIR
e. Copies of reports and information. If City requests
additional copies of 'reports, drawings, specifications,
or any other material in addition to what the
Consultant . is required to furnish in limited quantities
as part of the services under this agreement,,
Consultant shall provide such additional copies as are
requested, and City shall compensate Consultant for the
costs of duplicating such copies at Consultant's direct
expense.
3. DUTIES OF CITY
City agrees to cooperate with Consultant and to perform that work
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference.
4. COMPENSATION
The Consultant will perform the work in phases as described in
Exhibit "A ".
Consultant will bill City on a time and material basis upon
completion of the identified phases. City will pay invoices
according to its normal accounts payable schedule, generally
within.30 days of receipt. The.Consultant may not charge more
than the amount shown in Exhibit "A" without prior approval of
the City's Project Manager.
5. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF THE WORK
Program scheduling shall follow the attached Exhibit "A" unless
revisions are approved by the City's Project Manager and
Consultant.
Time extensions may be allowed for delays caused by City, other:
governmental agencies, or factors not directly brought about by
the negligence or lack of due care on the part of the Consultant.
6. TEMPORARY_SUSPENSION
The Community Development Director shall have the authority to
suspend this agreement wholly or in part, for such period as he
deems necessary due to unfavorable conditions or to the failure
on the part of the Consultant to perform any provision of this
agreement. Consultant will be paid the compensation due and
payable to the date of temporary suspension.
Consultant Services Agreement 4
Water Treatment Plant EIR
7. SUSPENSION:_TERMINATION
a. Right to suspend or terminate. The city retains the
right to terminate this agreement for any reason.by
notifying Consultant in writing seven days prior to
termination and by paying the compensation due and
payable to the date of termination; provided, however-,
if this agreement is terminated for'fault of
Consultant, City shall be obligated to compensate
Consultant only for that portion of Consultant services
which are of benefit to City. Said compensation is to
be arrived at by mutual agreement of the City and
Consultant and should they fail to agree, then an
independent arbitrator is to be appointed and his
decision shall be binding upon the parties.
b. Return of materials_. Upon such termination, Consultant
shall turn over to the City immediately any and all
copies of studies, sketches, drawings, computations,
and other data, whether or not completed, prepared by
Consultant, and for which Consultant has received
reasonable compensation, or given to Consultant in
connection with this agreement. Such materials shall
become the permanent property of City. Consultant,
however, shall not be liable for City's use of
incomplete materials.or for City's use of complete
documents if used for other than the project
contemplated by this agreement.
B. INSPECTION
Consultant shall furnish city with every reasonable opportunity
for City to ascertain that the services of Consultant are being
performed in accordance with the requirements.and intentions of
this agreement. All work done and all material`s furnished, .if
any, shall be subject to the City's Project Manager's inspection
and approval. The inspection of such work shall not relieve
Consent of any of its obligations to fulfill its agreement.as
prescribed.
9. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
All original drawings, plan documents and other materials
prepared by or in possession of Consultant pursuant to this
agreement shall become the permanent property of the City,, and
shall be delivered'to the City upon demand.
Consultant Services Agreement 5
Water Treatment Plant EIR
10. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT
Failure of City to agree with Consultant's independent findings,
conclusions, or recommendations, if the same are called for under
this agreement, on the basis of. differences in matters of
judgment shall not be construed as a failure on the part of
Consultant to meet the requirements of this agreement.
11. ASSIGNMENT: SUBCONTRACTORS: EMPLOYEES
This agreement is for the performance of professional consulting
services of the Consultant and is not assignable by the
consultant without prior consent of the City in writing. The
Consultant may employ other specialists to perform special
services as required with prior approval by the City.
12. NOTICES
All notices hereunder shall be given in writing and mailed,
postage prepaid, by Certified Mail, addressed as follows:
To City: Community Development Department
City of San Luis Obispo
B.O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 =8100
To Consultant:
Technical Analysis Corporation
262 Second Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
13. INTEREST OF CONSULTANT
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest, and shall
not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or
otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the
Performance of the services hereunder. Consultant further
__
covenants that, in the performance of this agreement, no
subcontractor or person having such an interest shall be
employed. Consultant certifies that no one who has or will have
any financial interest under this agreement is an officer or
employee of City. It is expressly agreed that, in the
performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall at all
times be deemed an independent contractor.and not an agent or.
employee of City.
Consultant Services Agreement 6
Water Treatment Plant EIR
14. INDEMNITY
Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify and save harmless City, its
officers, agents and employees of and froti
a. Any and all claims and demands which may be made
against City, its officers, agents, or employees by
reason of any injury to or death of any person or
corporation caused by any negligent act or omission of
Consultant under this agreement or of Consultant's
employees or agents;
b. Any and all damage to or destruction of the property of
City, its officers, agents, or employees occupied or
used by or in the care, custody, or control of
Consultant, or in proximity to the site of Consultant's
work, caused by any negligent act or. omission of
Consultant under this agreement or of Consultant's
employees or agents;.
c. Any and all claims and demands which may be made
against City, its officers, agents, or employees by
reason of any injury to or death of or damage suffered
or sustained by any employee or agent of Consultant
under this agreement, however caused, excepting,
however, any such claims and demands which are the
result of the negligence or willful misconduct of City,
its officers, agents, or employees;
d. Any and all claims and demands which may be made
against City, its officers, agents, or employees by
reason of any infringement or alleged infringement of
any patent rights or claims caused by the use of any
apparatus, appliance, or materials furnished by
Consultant under this agreement; and
e. Any and all penalties imposed or damages sought on
account of the violation of any law or regulation or of
any term or condition of any permit, when said
violation of any law or regulation.or of any term or
condition of any permit is due to negligence on the
part of the Consultant.
Consultant, at its own costs, expense, and risks, shall defend
any and all suits, actions, or other legal proceedings that may
be brought against or for employees on any such claim or demand
of such third persons, or to enforce any such penalty, and pay
and satisfy any judgment or decree that may be rendered against
City, its officers, agents, or employees in any such suit, action
or other legal proceeding, when same were due to negligence of
Consultant Services Agreement 7
Water Treatment Plant EIR
the Consultant.
15. WORKERS COMPENSATION
Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
Labor Code of.the State of California, which
employer to be insured against liability for
or to undertake self - insurance in accordance
of that code, and it certifies that it will
provisions before commencing the performance
agreement.
16. INSURANCE
provisions of the
require every
workers compensation
with the provisions
-omply with such
of:the work of this
The Consultant shall provide proof of comprehensive general
liability insurance ($500,000) (including automobile) and
professional liability insurance ($250,000.) satisfactory to the
City.
17. AGREEMENT BINDING
The terms, covenants, and conditions of this agreement shall
apply to, and shall bind, the successors, executors,
administrators, assigns, and subcontractors of both parties.
18. WAIVERS
The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any
term, covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any
provision, ordinance, or law shall not be deemed to be a_ waiver
of any subsequent breach of violation of the same or of any other -
term, covenant, condition, ordinance, or law. The subsequent
acceptance by either party of any fee or other money which may
become due hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any
preceding breach or_ violation by the other party of. any term,
covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any applicable law
or ordinance.
19. COSTS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES
The prevailing party in any action between the parties to this
agreement brought to enforce the terms of this agreement or
arising out of this agreement may recover its reasonable costs
and attorney's fees expended in connection with such an action
from the other party.
Consultant Services Agreement 8
Water- Treatment Plant EIR
20. DISCRIMINATION
No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons
under this agreement because of the race, color, national origin,
ancestry, religion or sex of such person. If Consultant is
found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions of the
State of California Fair Employment Practices Act or similar
provisions of federal law or executive order in the performance
of this agreement, it shall thereby be found in material breach
of this agreement. Thereupon, City shall have the power to
cancel.or suspend this agreement, in whole or in part, or to
deduct from the amount payable to Consultant the sum of Twenty -
five Dollars ($25) for each person for each calendar day during
which such person was discriminated against, as damages for said
breach of contract, or both. Only a t finding of the State of
California Fair Employment. Practices Commission or the equivalent
federal agency or officer shall constitute evidence of a
violation of contract under this paragraph.
If Consultant is found in violation of the nondiscrimination
provisions of this agreement or the applicable affirmative action
guidelines pertaining to this agreement, Consultant shall be
found in material breach of the agreement. Thereupon, City shall
have the power to cancel or suspend this agreement, in whole gr-
in part, or to deduct from the amount payable to Consultant the
sum of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250) for each calendar day
during which Consultant is found to have been in such
noncompliance as damages for said breach of contract, or both.
21. AGREEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDERSTANDINGS
This document represents the entire and integrated agreement
between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations, or agreemens
t, either written or
oral. This document may be amended . only by written instrument,
signed by both City and Consultant. All provisions of this
agreement are expressly made.condit -ions. This agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State of California.
e
A
Consultant. Services Agreement
Water Treatment Plant EIR
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this
agreement the date first above written:
CONSULTANT
By 1
Don H..,Beckham, Vice President
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By
ayor`, Ron Dmin
ATTEST:
0
Pi
gmD: contract.wp 050- 9744- 092 -570
EXHIBIT A
1. Statement of Qualifications
This section is provided in format and content according to
item 1 on page 2 of'the RFP.
1:1. Description of the Firm and Experience
Technical Analysis Corporation (TAC) was established in 1981
in McLean, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, DC. The San Francisco
office was established in 1985. Since its inception, TAC has
provided top quality technical consulting to a host of state and
municipal governments and agencies in nineteen states.
In the field of energy conservation, TAC has provided services
to local government, to commercial and industrial facilities, and
to residential clients. over the past three years. TAC assisted the
City and County of San Francisco in formulating technical and
administrative guidelines for an energy conservation program known
as the Commercial Energy Conservation Ordinance (CECO). Staff of
TAC are now involved in the CECO public hearing process on behalf
of the Mayor's Energy Management Committee. In the private sector,
the company has done energy audits of over seven million square
feet of office and industrial facilities. These structures range
from 2,000 to 210001000 square feet in size and- vary from the
simple to the complex. A complete listing of TAC projects related
to energy conservation is appended to this proposal as attachment
B, Part 3.
In addition to energy conservation, TAC personnel are well
qualified in the field of water treatment. To supplement its in
house experience, however, TAG has secured the services of its
associate, Mr. Frank Steiner who served as Senior Engineer for the
San Luis Obispo Water System Master-Plan and Rate Studv.performed
about ten years ago. His experience includes project management,
5
�1
design, and construction of water treatment, wastewater treatment,
and.similar facilities in California.
The Company's work also involves technical analysis of the
i
design, construction and operation of fossil and nuclear electric
generating units. TAC has provided witnesses to testify before the
Public Utility Commissions of nineteen states on the prudence of
utility company expenditures for the construction and operation of
power plants, on decommissioning costs, and on industry cos;:
i
comparisons for nuclear plants, including construction, operation
and maintenance, and capital additions. A listing of TAC projects
related to the technical analysis of electric generating units is
appended to this proposal as Attachment B, Parts 1 and 4.
1.3. Individuals Who Will Actually Do the work
Resumes of the following TAC personnel are included as Attachment
C to this proposal;
Don H. Beckham, C.E.M., Vice President
C. Frank Steiner, P.E., CFS Associates, Senior Associate
John D. Peters, Ph.D., Senior Principal
David Dietrich, P.E., Principal Engineer
James E. Landes, P.E., Engineer
Don H. Eggert, Engineer
Don H. Beckham. Mr. Beckham manages the San Francisco office of
TAC and is a Certified Energy Manager with the Association of
Energy Engineers in Atlanta. He directs or participates in energy
inspections and audits and is licensed by the City of San Francisco
as a Commercial Energy Inspector. Regarding water treatment, Mr.
Beckham has participated in an extensive evaluation of the water
treatment and waste water treatment facilities in the Washington,
D.C. area for the Washington, D.C. Council of Governments and
contributed to a study published by the Water Resources Center of
the University of the District of Columbia on Areawide. Water
Resources Management.
C. Frank Steiner. TAC has secured the services of this eminent .
associate for the Stenner.Canyon project. Mr. Steiner is familiar
with the San Luis Obispo water treatment system and served as
Senior Engineer for the San Luis Obispo Water System Master Plan
and Rate Study performed about ten years ago. His experience
includes project management, design, and construction of water
treatment, wastewater treatment, and similar facilities in
California.
John D. Peters. Dr. Peters has extensive experience in energy
conservation and management and has conducted evaluations of
8
c-9 -/i0
commercial and industrial facilities for local governments, the 1
federal government, and private industry. He has experience in the I
construction of large projects in the U.S: Air Force, Engineering
Division and established the first energy conservation and quality
assurance programs -in the Air-Force.
David_Dietrich. Mr. Dietrich has had a lead role in TAC energy
conservation audits and is ,licensed by the City of.San.Francisco as
a Commercial and Residential Energy Inspector. A registered
Professional Engineer and a member of the American Water Works
Association, Mr. Dietrich also.. has design, specification, and
construction experience with industrial water treatment systems and
components including evaporators, demineralizers, flocculants,
various types of filters, and reverse osmosis.
James _E., Landes. Mr. Landes has broad experience in civil
engineering and construction. He is licensed as a Commercial
Energy Inspector by the City of San Francisco and participates in
energy inspections and audits. Mr. Landes is a registered
professional engineer in two fields, civil engineering and
corrosion engineering.
Don H._ Eggert. Mr. Eggert has a degree in physics from Dartmouth
College and is registered as an Engineer in Training (EIT) with the
State of California. He participates in TAC energy inspections and
audits and takes a lead role in tasks involving lighting energy
conservation. Mr. Eggert is licensed by the City of San Francisco
as a residential energy inspector.
9
G -9-17
2. Description of-Research and Analysis
The basic element of the focused EIR process is the energy
Audit. Several steps are common to all elements of water utility
operation including distribution pumping, transmission pumping,
wastewater treatment, and water treatment. These steps have been
formulated for the water treatment plant and include:
The following discussion of each of these topics outlines the
methods, objectives, and work products.
2.1. Review the Quantity and Cost of Energy Consumed by the
Existing Plant and by the Improvements.
TAC performed a brief review of the Black & Veatch design
drawings for the Stenner Canyon plant in San Luis Obispo on April
22, 1991. We also reviewed PG &E's energy consumption and rate
schedules for the existing plant with the Water Treatment Plant
Supervisor, Mr. Ken Earing. While these drawings and schedules
provide an excellent starting point for a thorough review of the
quantity and cost of energy consumed by the existing plant, these
Ou7
f Cpl
7
7
1.
Review the quantity and cost of energy consumed; by the
existing plant and by the improvements.
2.
Determine how and where the energy is used.
3.,
Evaluate the physical characteristics of the equipment that
have the greatest impact on energy requirements.
4.
Evaluate operational procedures that involve the equipment
with emphasis on the utility rate schedule.
5.
Evaluate operational procedures that involve the equipment
with emphasis on load shifting.
6.
Identify potential energy conservation measures in equipment
design and operations.
7.
Determine cost and benefit of each energy conservation measure
As a basis for recommendation.
The following discussion of each of these topics outlines the
methods, objectives, and work products.
2.1. Review the Quantity and Cost of Energy Consumed by the
Existing Plant and by the Improvements.
TAC performed a brief review of the Black & Veatch design
drawings for the Stenner Canyon plant in San Luis Obispo on April
22, 1991. We also reviewed PG &E's energy consumption and rate
schedules for the existing plant with the Water Treatment Plant
Supervisor, Mr. Ken Earing. While these drawings and schedules
provide an excellent starting point for a thorough review of the
quantity and cost of energy consumed by the existing plant, these
Ou7
f Cpl
7
7
documents do not address energy consumption of the plant upgrade.
We will evaluate the increases in energy, consumption due to the
plant upgrade by reviewing in detail the drawings and
specifications for the upgrade. The energy consumption of all
systems and components should be readily available in the equipment
specifications prepared by Black and Veatch in Walnut Creek.
2.2. Determine How and Where the Energy is Used.
j
The ,annual energy use of the existing plant is about 1.6
million kWh according to the Planning Department. The annual
energy use of the plant after the improvements will be about 4.5
million kWh. Our initial analysis will determine what parts of the
total energy budget will be consumed by ozone-generation, filter
operation, other process costs, pumping costs, facility lighting,
facility HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) , and
other- sources. This information will provide a basis for seeking
out appropriate energy conservation measures. In effect, the
amount of effort applied to each end use, e.g., ozone generation or
building heating, should be proportional to its energy consumption.
2.3. Evaluate the Physical Characteristics of the Equipment that
have the Greatest Impact on Energy Requirements.
The systems identified in the previous step that use the
largest amounts of energy will receive more detailed study. The
components of those systems will be studied to identify their
B energy consumption and potential for conservation. Both initial
3 cost and operating costs will be addressed by standard life cycle
cost analysis methods.
' 11
G- 5r /°%
2.4. Evaluate Operational Procedures that Involve the Equipment
with Emphasis on the Utility Rate Schedule.
0
The plant is currently billed under Pacific Gas & Electric's
A -10 rate schedule. Since the upgrade will result in increased
energy consumption by the plant, other rate schedules may be
available. TAC will consider each available schedule in order- to
determine the one resulting in the lowest bill to the city. During
TAC's review of the City of San Luis Obispo's monthly energy bills
on April 22, significant potential was found for reducing the
energy bills of other plants and buildings by switching rate
schedules.
2.5. Evaluate operational Procedures that Involve the Equipment
with Emphasis on Load Shifting.
How equipment is operated often has as great an impact on. the
energy bill as the type of equipment itself. For example, there
are numerous case studies in the literature of operations where
four pumps run for two hours instead of one pump running for eight
hours. Although four pumps running for two hours use the same
amount of total energy as one pump running for eight hours, the
four pumps use four times as much peak power. If the four- pumps
run during peak demand hours, they could lead to an unnecessarily
large kilowatt demand charge. Optimal use of storage capacity to
avoid on -peak demand charge is another example of operational
improvement that reduces the energy bill but not the quality of
service. TAC will evaluate operational procedures to determine if
improvements can be made to lower the energy bill.
Shifting demand off of peak periods is encouraged by utility
rate schedules because it.reduces the need for new capacity (ie.
generating plants, transmission lines, etc.). In addition to
saving money, this method of conservation is environmentally sound
12
I
N
i
policy.
2.6. Identify Potential Energy Conservation Measures in Equipment
Design and Operations.
Equipment design and operation may be altered to allow greater
energy conservation. An example of this might involve increased
reservoir capacity to allow more flexible operation of the plant.
The existing reservoir can store six hours of production. With
more storage capacity, the plant could be operated at off peak
hours, thus reducing demand charges.
Another example might involve high efficiency.motors. It is
usually cost- effective to replace low efficiency motors in. sizes of
25 horsepower or more. The three 75- horsepower transfer pumps
presently installed at the plant therefore offer excellent
potential for energy conservation.
2.7. Determine cost and benefit of each energy conservation measure
as a basis for recommendation.
For proposed energy conservation measures, TAC will employ the
BLOC code, Version 3.0 developed by the U.S. Department of Commerce
as a standard life cycle cost analysis method. This analysis
allows all costs (purchase, installation, capital and energy costs)
over the entire lifetime of the equipment to be minimized. Simple
payback and rate of return will also be provided.
13
Proposed Time Schedule
Initial staff meeting - week of May 20
Administrative draft EIR complete - July 1, 1991
Public review draft EIR published - July 16, 1991
Close of public review period - September 3, 1991
City Council certification of final EIR - October 1, 1991
C --;-e -
Zz
4. Maximum Cost
4.1. Direct Costs
Technical Analysis Corporation proposes to complete the tasks
listed in the RFP and.in this proposal for a maximum price not to
exceed $29,520 in direct costs. The schedule of payments is
discussed in the following section. Invoices will be based on the
time actually spent and may be less than the proposed maximum
figure. Hourly rates for the individuals are:
Mr. Beckham, Mr. Steiner $135
Mr. Dietrich, Dr. Peters 110
Mr. Landes 85
Mr. Eggert 65
The following table gives a breakdown of the staff hours and
dollar amounts corresponding to each task. The total contract
amount not to be exceeded is $29,520. This.s a "not -to- exceed"
cost, not a fixed price proposal and TAC will bill only for hours
actually spent.
4.2.. Indirect Costs
These costs include travel, copying, postage, and so forth.
Travel expenses will include trips by car to San Luis Obispo and to
Black and Veatch in Walnut Creek. The latter is a short distance
from TAC- offices in San Francisco and will be 'a minor expense.
Trips to San Luis will also be a small expense with appropriate
planning. TAC will not bill San Luis "for travel included in the
Proposed schedule. Additional trips required by the city of San
Luis Obispo will be billed at cost.
Regarding other indirect expenses, .TAC estimates that copying
and overnight express delivery may add $300 to the expenses. These
costs will be billed to San Luis Obispo without markup.
16
G� -23
Level of Effort..by Task and Individual
L \slo.wkl3
1 Project meeting in SLO
2 Review plans
3 Site audit
4 Audit rpt and adnin draft EIR
5 Draft EIR
6 Public hearing
7 COMMent res and final EIR
8 Public meeting
10
I�
r�
y
G -8 -2�
Beckham
Dietrich
Eggert
Landes
Peters
Steiner
Sum
Sum
Rate
135
1110
65
85
110
135
Task
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)
(hr)_
(S)
1
4
4
4
4
16
1780
2
16
16
8
40
3880
3
8
e
16
1400
4
8
.24
24
8
4
8
76
7480
5
16
16
32
2800
6
8
8
16
1960
7
8
32
24
8
8
4
84
8260
8
8
8
16
1960
Proj. hr
20
116
92
16
12
40
296
Audit hr
8
48
48
8
4
16
132
Audit S
1080
5280
3120
680
440
2160
12760
12760
Proj. S
2700
12760
5980
:ELI320
L 000
29520
r29520
L \slo.wkl3
1 Project meeting in SLO
2 Review plans
3 Site audit
4 Audit rpt and adnin draft EIR
5 Draft EIR
6 Public hearing
7 COMMent res and final EIR
8 Public meeting
10
I�
r�
y
G -8 -2�
5. Payment Schedule
The payment schedule for completion of Work shall be as suggested
in the RFP:
1. 50% of total contract amount paid upon completion of the
administrative draft.
2. 30% of total contract amount paid upon circulation of the
public review draft.
3. Remaining 20% of total contract amount .paid at
certification of the final EIR.
L_ I
I
18
i
I
J
r
r
r
r
r
r
I• I�
6. Work Products
The work products produced by Technical Analysis Corporation shall
consist of the following:
1. Three copies of the administrative draft EIR.
2. One camera -ready original copy of the public review draft
EIR
3. Attendance at up to two public hearings to present TAC's
conclusions and to respond to questions and comments.
4. A compilation of comments and written responses which will
be included in a council agenda report for consideration in
certifying the.EIR.
5. One camera -ready original of the final EIR in form
certified by the City Council (including comments and
responses).
19
7. Minimum Outline of EIR
Summary
Background
Environmental Procedures and Intended Use of the EIR
Initial Study and Focused EIR
A. Project Description
1. Equipment and Processes
2. Fuel Type and End Use
3. Energy Conservation Equipment and Design
4. Initial and Life Cycle Costs
5. Trips and Energy
B.I. Environmental Setting
C. Environmental Impacts
1. Energy Requirements and Efficiencies
2. Local and Regional Effects
3. Peak and Base Loads
4. Existing Standards
5. Effects on Energy Resources
6. Transportation Energy
D. Mitigation Measures
1. Potential Measures
2. Potential of Siting, Orientation, and Design
3. Potential for Reducing Peak Demand
4. Alternate Fuels
5. Recycling
E. Alternatives
F. Unavoidable Adverse Effects
G. Irreversible Commitment of Resources
H. Short -Term Gains vs. Long -Term Impacts
I. Growth Inducing Effects
Attachment: Initial Study
20
C� -z?
RESOLUTION NO. 6979
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
AUTHORIZING CONSULTANT SELECTION AND AGREEMENT FOR THE
STENNER CANYON WATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed staff to proceed with
work on upgrading the main water treatment plant to meet
standards for public water supplies; and
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated an agreement with Technical
Analysis Corporation for preparation of an environmental impact
report in compliance with state and city requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
SECTION 1. The certain agreement, attached hereto marked
Exhibit "1" and incorporated herein by reference, between the
City and Technical Analysis Corporation is hereby approved and
the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The City Finance Director shall transfer and
encumber $31,000 from the Capital Appropriations Fund ( #9090-
080 -890) to Project Account No. 050 - 9740 - 092 -570 for consultant
services and related expenses.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this
resolution and a copy of the executed consultant's agreement
approved by it to the Finance Director, the Community Development.
Director, and Technical Analysis Corporation.
On motion of r'.rnin ri 1Tn mbar Perm >> g Pg seconded by
r mTnri lmPmh, r Rill Rnnlma., , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Crnmcilmembers Rappa, Roalman, and Reiss
NOES: Council er: -.Pinard and Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day of
May , 1991.
3� �•._�
Mayor Ron' Dunin
ATTEST:
a
City VClerk, Pam' oges
f
6979
A- 29- 91 -CC'
i
Resolution No.6979
Page 2
Utilities Director
gmD: stnr -cc.wp
i 1
c G
s G.
J
m
ATTACHMENT #1
AGREE= NO.- A- 28 -91 -CC
LEASE FOR USE OF PROPERTY
This lease, made and entered into this day, of
by and between the CITY OF SAN LUIS,OBISPO (hereinafter, "Ci y"),
a Municipal Corporation, and SAN LUIS OBISPO BROADCASTING LIMITED
(hereinafter "SLO Broadcasting "), a California Limited Partnership.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into an agreement
whereby the City will lease approximately thirty square feet of
the Lessor's real property at 2895 South Higuera Street, San Luis
Obispo, California, on which. the Lessee will operate radio
transmission facilities for the Municipal Government and SLO
Broadcasting will lease land at City's Waste Water Treatment Plant
as a site for a receiver dish;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and agreements,
covenants and conditions stated herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. PREMISES LEASED.
SLO' Broadcasting leases to City, and City hires from SLO
Broadcasting, certain real property located in the City of San Luis
Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo,. State of California, being a
portion of the premises known as 2895 South Higuera Street as more
,particularly shown on the attached Exhibit 1, incorporated.herein
by reference.
The City will move the existing site electrical generating
plant to a mutually agreed location and place it in a weather
tight, physically secure structure. In exchange, the City will
utilize the space vacated by the generator for their transmission
equipment, as shown on Exhibit 1.
City leases to SLO Broadcasting, and SID Broadcasting hires from
City, certain real property located in the City of San Luis Obispo,
San Luis Obispo County, California, being such portion of the
premises of the San Luis Obispo City Waste Water Treatment Plant
as shown on Exhibit 3..
2. TERM; OPTION TO RENEW.
- a. The term of this lease shall commence on �_ ig91
and extended for a period of ten (10) years.
b. Both parties hereto shall have the right to renew this
lease for three (3) additional ten (10) year terms on the same
terms and conditions set forth herein, upon the giving of sixty
(60) days advance written notice.
A-28-91-CC
6978
3. RENTAL.
City shall pay to the SLO Broadcastin as_ rent for this lease
the sum of four hundred dollars ($400.00) per month for the first
year, which shall include the premises described above and all
electrical power needed for the City's equipment. SLO Broadcasting
shall pay to the City one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month for
the first year, which shall include the premises. The amount of
rent owed by the City and the amount of rent owed by SLO
Broadcasting shall be increased annually by four percent (4 %) on
each anniversary date of the commencement of the term of this
lease. City will forward to SLO Broadcasting a check each month
for the net difference in the lease amount.
4. PURPOSE.
City shall be entitled to use the premises for the. purpose
of installing and operating radio transmitters together with such
appurtenant facilities as may be necessary or convenient for the
transmission of radio signals.
SLO Broadcasting shall be entitled to use the premises herein
leased solely for the purpose of installing and operating on the
premises a Receive only Terminal facility as may be necessary or
convenient for the reception of satellite radio signals.
5. INCONSISTENT USE.
Neither party hereto shall, make any use of the premises which
is inconsistent with the other party's interest in or use of the
premises. Neither party, its agents, employees or assigns shall
perform any act which will impair or interfere with the other
party's interest in or use of the premises leased or the premises
of-which the premises leased are a part.
6. RIGHT -OF- -WAY: UTILITIES EASEMENTS..
City shall have the right of ingress and egress from the
premises leased and described above to the transmitter site along
the existing route, on a .24 hour a day basis said route to be
twenty (20) feet in width, as shown on Exhibit 2.
City shall provide an easement affording PLO Broadcasting
reasonable ingress and egress to the premises being leased. SLO
Broadcasting shall improve, if necessary, and maintain the easement
provided. SLO Broadcasting shall also be entitled to an easement
for-full utilities and telephone on, over, and across the easement
for ingress and egress provided.
7. TELEPHONE LEASED LINES.
City shall make all arrangements for and pay for telephone
leased links to the leased premises shown on Exhibit 1. Said
leased line shall be installed along existing telephone company
routes and facilities.
SLO Broadcasting shall make all arrangements for and pay for
all utilities and services furnished to or used by it on the leased
premises shown on Exhibit 3, including, without limitation, gas,
electricity, water, telephone service, and trash collection, and
for all connection charges.
8. RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE.
Each party hereto shall be responsible for all claims
damages arising out of its own negligent acts or omissions.
9. TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
a. Either party hereto shall have the right to terminate this
agreement on. twelve (12) month's written notice to the other party.
b. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, City shall have the
right to modify this lease to relocate its facilities to a separate
location on the parcel of which the leased premises are a part, to
construct a facility or their sole use as a
y permanent transmission
facility.
10. TIME.
Time is of the essence of this lease.
11. BINDING.
Each of the terms and conditions of this lease shall extend
to and be binding on and shall inure to.the benefit of not
only the City and SLO Broadcasting, but to each of their
respective heirs, administrators, executors, successors and
assigns. Any reference in this lease to either City or SLO
Broadcast ing.sha11 be'deemed to include, whenever applicable,
the heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns
of such parties, the same as if in every case expressed.
12. RECORDATION.
it is the intention of the parties this agreement be
recorded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this lease
on the date first written above.
SAN LUIS OBISPO BROADCASTING
LIMITED
BY
Guy Ha an
General Partner
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By
nin
Clerk Pam
Approved as to form: Approved as to content:
5 /7-�ro eK11
Public Works Director
7'
J
rJ'`
� �� /�
(J ,
._,< � Ii .��� iii•
ff
�i /I .i
a ` 4v .
.1
,4
Y �•- z: ,
u,
r �
,
R
r�
��
71
;,
X
S_
C• N l&uc-FX) ST
O.
J
�r
'(I
dl
1' 1
ci
RESOLUTION NO. 6978 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND
GUY HACKMAN FOR CITY'S USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR
LOCATION OF RADIO REPEATER EQUIPMENT AND GUY HACKMAN'S
USE OF LAND AT CITY'S WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR
RECEIVER DISH SITE.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by reference, between the City of San Luis Obispo and Guy Hackman for the City's use of
certain property for location of Police, Fire, and Public Works radio transmission equipment and
antenna and Guy Hackman's use of certain property located at City's Waste Water Treatment Plant
for receiver dish is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. Resolution No. 3909 is hereby superseded.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a copy of the
executed agreement approved by it to: Finance Department, Fire Department, Guy Hackman.
Council member Coumcilmember
Upon motion of Bill Roalrm , seconded by .Penny Rarma
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers`Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunn
NOES: None
ABMTr: None 6978
A- 28 -91 -CC
the foregoing resolution was adopted this
ATTEST:
UAAA
Pam VI es, City Clerk 0
i Officer
1 !l/ i
21 day of
Mayor Ron Dunin
olice Chief
1991. .
MAKE voz -
Finance Director Public Works Director
Y ,
1
J ; X71
V;
O C
0
r.
RESOLUTION NO. 6977 (1991 series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING THE LATE CLAIM APPLICATION
OF MATT KOKKONEN
WHEREAS, the alleged damage to Matt Kokkonen specified in the late
claim is alleged to have been evident by September 20, 1990 and
WHEREAS, Matt Kokkonen was participating in the City's administrative
appeal process of the Water Conservation Program following that date; and
WHEREAS, Matt Kokkonen has timely filed an application to file a late
claim for damages with the City of San Luis Obispo
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo that the late claim application filed by Matt Kokkonen be granted.
On motion of Cotmcilumber.. Bill -Roalmar!
seconded by Coimciltneuiber Fenny, Ratma , and on the following roll
call vote:
Ayes: Cotmcilmembers Roalman., Ranpa , Dinard, Reiss; - d Mayor Dunain
Noes: . None-
Absent: None
6977
t
i
Resolution No. 6977 (1991 Series)
Page 2
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day of
1991.
ATTEST: UrtA.'s
Pam Yoges, City erk
i Admi istrative Officer
o-'Mayor Ron Dunin
0-11f p ly
r
i,
t
1w✓ C%JLi�.._%
RESOLUTION NO..6976 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING
THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 1991
WHEREAS, a Special Muncipal Election was held in the City of San Luis Obispo
on the 9th day of April, 1991, which election was duly held and conducted in the manner
provided by the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo, and as provided by law for the
purpose of voting on Measures A, B, C and D.
WHEREAS, under'the provisions of City Council Resolution 6918 (1991 Series), the
Board of Supervisors was authorized to perform the official canvass of the April 9, 1991,
Special Municipal Election pursuant to the election laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, a statement of the results of said election has been duly entered by the
City Clerk in the official records of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that:
SECTION 1. The whole number of votes cast in said election within the City of San
Luis Obispo was 7,974.
SECTION 2. The title of each measure voted on, and the number of votes given
at each precinct to each measure, are shown by the tabulation of votes, marked Exhibit "X
and attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated as though fully set forth.
SECTION 3. There were submitted to the vote of the electorate at said election
by City of San Luis Obispo Resolutions 6917 and 6918 (1991 Series) four measures to be
voted upon as follows and the number of votes for and against each measure as indicated
below:
Resolution No. 6976 (1991 Series)
Page Two
A Shall the approval of the planned development YES 5348
rezoning for Tract 1750 be repealed? NO 2454
B Shall the Water Action to Eliminate Rationing
YES 1780
ordinance be adopted?
NO 6138
C Shall the City Charter Sections 302 and 404 be
amended to move the General.Municipal Election
YES 4172
from November of the odd- numbered. year to
NO 3547
November of the even - numbered year:
D Should the City of San Luis Obispo participate
YES 3716
in the State Water Project (Advisory Vote Only)
NO 4198
SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that as a result of said.
election, the majority of the , qualified voters voting on the measures did vote in favor of
Measures A and C and in opposition to Measures B and D.
Councihneirber Coimcihnember
On motion of Bill Roal= , seconded by -Penny -Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Crnmcilme_nbers Rohm, °Rappa -, Tinard; `Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None_
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 21 day of May , 1991.
ayor Ron Dann
ATTEST:
r
Pam oges, CiTy C Ork
Resolution No. 6976 (1001 Seris)
Page Three
APPROVED:
City Ad ' 'strative Officer
ty V,10 rn y
U,
City leek
�1
CERTIFICATE
I, Pam Voges, the City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, certify that the following is
the final statement of votes cast at the Special Municipal Election held in the City of San
Luis Obispo, California, on April 9, 1991.
1 - Number of registered voters in City: 22,116
2 - Number of votes cast in the City: 7,974
3 - Tabulation of votes on Measure A (Exhibit "A")
4 - Tabulation of votes on Measure B (Exhibit "B ")
5 - Tabulation of votes on Measure C (Exhibit "C')
6 - Tabulation of votes on Measure D (Exhibit "D ")
Witness my hand and the seal of the City Clerk of San Luis Obispo this day of
"qAt, 1991.
av% U4AA
PIT, Voges, Ci lerk
z
0
� � a
u a �
y
b
r
Q
N_
a
n
4k
e
h
INk
OF
0ZZ
y
z
U1
ti
N
00
m
N
M
Q
a6
b
O
>
I-
p�_
Q
r
G
Q
r
N
Q
A
tR
e�e
t�f
r
A
e
N
34
N
P
a
3
a
w N
N P
� N
O p
It
g (n
Q
0
Q
a z
N
i r
P
w�+
R
N
e
w
en
N
U
0
a
N Q
� Q
ik $
P N
i► R
Soh ,
n
�
c..
c
8�16
F
Q
b
w
Q
Q
s�
m
h
w
tl`
N
a
Q
O
i3 $`
N �p
9 A
T /7
Nf
s
r
w
h e
M
w
N
w
Is
it
w
a
n
c�
Q
Z
N
S,
q
a
s
N
v
m
Z
F
wl
i
EQa
Z'
O � m
L �
X U
G i f
h
h
v
w
en
+Ik
_N
H
P
4k
m
ac
F
�O
Q '
9p �
�k
,Z
y0
Us
v
m
N
b
Q
M
ad
b
b
F
tP�1
b
O
na
O
F
�1
F
N
Q
O
e�e
f�f
F
Q
n
b
M
O
P
N
Q
N
ODO
F
M
�d
� S
NI
Q ^
r
C7,
P1 ^
^
f
Q
a
z°
}
W
i
aS
h
h
�r
N
^
O
N
b
N
m
ri
n.
'9k
�mpp
N
M
N
N.'.
�p
m i
F
4
G'
C� n�
s
m
Q
Q
M
Q
F
b
b
a
v�O
n
9
aqe
e
aq
Q
b
Q
Q
mq
M
t�
y�
f�f
yN
N
b
4q
W
N
0
va O
N ^
m f�
PI
pV^
.Oa N
N
C ^
m
Q •+
N
N O
IpV .m^r
N ^
a�
m
M
I
w+
N
n
N
O �
.n
all
M
M
c�
°z
Pf
v
N
h
m
b
Z
e�
[Ll
F
O
v
V]
og
E2c
a
U Qj cg
Ll
s s
P
C]
.Q+
M
N_
0
1k
P
R
n
Ve
�o
W
N
A
pzpp�
Ua
b
Go
a
^b
h
R
M
b
g
C
taj O
cs
b
h
N
C
Q
e�p
17
Q
�I
f1N
V�
N
R
s
n
Q N
0 00
Q
e
y N
N
88 $
i°
b
P
.r
t�
� Q
C >
i
s
1�
h
n
e
N
e
ti
M
N
e�
f�f
mm�
N
N
+IF
wi
P_
,pp
a.:
Z.
s
v
N
Q
a
Q
n
6
Q
10
�O
P P
b n
n �o
MI [�
P P
r
� s
e
N N1
R
�D
n
U � Z
>
i
r
N
s
n
oP
N
n
n
m
°z
4Nf '
V
C7
C'
8e
li
6f
Z
v
Q
i I
Z in
° ��4
W
L �
� ` Q
y
6
h
e
M
N_
M
O
�1k
P
n
ik
V
M
N
°
J
z
U a
a
cc
P
e
n
h
b
b
O
O
C�
n
GQ
e
W)
W)
N
e
n
IN+I
N
ae
�Np
Oop`
Nf
V�
N
09
M
n
0
Nf N
N e
� r+
r r
P Q
N ..
P h
� N
ti
O.
V
n .Mn
n
pp N
n
° � z
h
N
h
h
it
N
N
N
N
h
N
a�
s
P
N
.ei
e
V
n
S°
e
b
�o
O
m
R
b
M
N
h
N
b
W
mb
N
e
0
i7
a
m 2
o ..
N
o n
fyi
N.ni
e~n e
Q .Mw
M �D
V 00
.Ow
N
° °z
M
M
N
n
N
O�
P
1~+1
V
g
A
h
Z
4�
V
h
i9
n
mN_
O�
e
2
v
n
M
J
O
��.
� ���� �
� �o� .,
r�' `� J��
R %OLUTION NO. 6975 (1991 Sas!,es)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TO PURCHASE MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, AND EQUIPMENT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby authorizes the Office of Procurement,
Department of General Services, State of California to purchase material, supplies, and
equipment for and on the behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo pursuant to Section
14814, Government Code.
SECTION 2. That the City Council authorizes the City Administrative Officer or
his designee to sign and deliver all necessary requests to purchase materials, supplies, and
equipment and other documents in connection therewith for and on behalf of the City
of San Luis Obispo_ .
Councilmember- Councilmenber, _
On motion of Foaiiaan- seconded by, _ i Rapper and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, pnd1layor Dunin
NOES: None --
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted the
e--- Mgy-Vr Ron Dunin
A ST: Uri "'s
PaIn Voges, C' Clerk
APPROVED:
City administrative Officer
21 day of 1jay. 1991
6975
xq« A Icif
u