HomeMy WebLinkAbout7025-7062C
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
city of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
J 3
1471
DOC. NO. 21122
OFFICIAL RECORDS
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO., CA
MAR 3 1 1992 i
FRANCIS M. COONEY j
County Clerk - Recorder
TIME 8:00 AM
RESOLUTION NO. 7062 (1991 Series)
oOI: RF
000Cr3L
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS_OBISPO FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A PORTION OF BOYSEN AVENUE NEAR SANTK ROSA STREET IS
UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC PURPOSES AND- ORDERING THE
ABANDONMENT OF SAME, SUBJECT TO RECORDATION OF A MAP REFLECTING
NEW LOT LINES AND RECORDATION OF.REVISED UTILITY EASEMENTS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the .Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the public hearing duly held
on December 10, 1991, pursuant to Section 8300 et seq. of the
California Streets and Highways Code., this Council finds and
determines that a portion of Boysen Street right -of -way as
described and shown_on the map marked "Exhibit A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein are not necessary for present or
future public purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of
said right of way, subject to:
1.. Satisfactory arrangements to guarantee the relocation of
public utilities, including water,.telephone and electric
power, and dedication to the City of necessary easements, to
the satisfaction of the respective utility companies and the
City Engineer, and
R -7062 p ,1 n
uni .185,Spur47C
Resolution No. 7062 (1991 Series)
Page Two.
2. Recordation of a lot line adjustment under LLA 91 -139
and /or a parcel map reflecting new property lines.
3. The above - conditions must be met within 180 days of the
date of this resolution or the resolution shall be void,
unless extended by the Council.
SECTION 3. Upon notice by the City Engineer that all
conditions have been met, as prescribed in Section 2 above, the
City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this order of
Abandonment, duly attested under the seal of the City, to be
recorded in the office of the Recorder of the.County of .San Luis
Obispo.
On motion of Councilman Roalman , seconded by Councilwoman Rappa_
and on the following roll call vote.
AYES: Councilmember.s Pnard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 10th day of
December , 1991.
+: OR ON DUNIN
�Al� --,AT TE
ERK PAM JWGEg
VOL 3858PAGM0
Resolution No. 7062 (1991 Series)
Page Three
City ANIministrative officer
Community
ty
p.Verry\BoysenAb.wp
1
VOL 38, )8PAcF501
N,7, 5•
Lf 6A L PESCelfrION
That portion of Boysen Avenue right of way, as shown on the map for Tract No.
66, recorded in Books of Maps, at page 01) In the Office of the County
Recorder, City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
That portion lying southeasterly of the northeasterly prolongation of the
northwesterly line of Lot 1 having a bearing of North 38 degrees 37 "minutes East
per said Tract 611
EXCEPT that portion lying northwesterly of a circular curare, concave to the
southeast, having a radius of 20.00 feet, and being tangent to the northwesterly
prolongation of the aforesaid northwesterly line of Lot 1, and terminating at a
tangent point on the southwesterly right of way line of California State Highway 1
(Santa Rosa Street).
tir:.m,:r4iP97I I
San LUI S OBiSPO ,Boysen w�: ndo�ir,��t
Department of Community Development
990 Palm Street /Post Office Box 321, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
GATAPNINT N15581 47all
END OF DOCUMENT vni &Tq;.RDArc.rll n 1% RX
� �_, :. . ,
I 1
�, �.
��� � ��
�� ��`
��
Resolution No. 7061
city of sAn Luis oBispo
a
of a
EXPRESSING THE CITY'S GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION TO MERLYN VAN
FOR HIS LONG AND DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS
WHEREAS, since Merlyn's first employment as Supervising Mechanic in
September 1972, he has had increasing maintenance responsibilities as the fleet has
grown from 50 vehicles to 165 vehicles; and
WHEREAS, complications in maintenance needs have continued to escalate
throughout the years; and
WHEREAS, Merlyn has striven mightily to continuously upgrade his knowledge of
all facets of equipment technology; and
WHEREAS, Merlyn implemented a Preventative Maintenance Program which
greatly reduced the failure rate of the fleet; and
WHEREAS, he has consistently striven to standardize the fleet and the condition
of the fleet is far superior to when he arrived; and
WHEREAS, despite his fascination with advances in technology, he resisted the
opportunities to become a computer nerd; and
WHEREAS, Merlyn is now looking forward to a well deserved rest and new
horizons to conquer.
NOW, THEREFORE,.BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo does hereby express its gratitude and appreciation to Merlyn Van for his long
and dedicated service to the City and its citizens.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa, seconded_ by Councilman Roalman, and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 10th day of December, 1991.
Voges, City) Clerk
Ron Dunin, Mayor
R -7061
,52-84
RESOLUTION NO.' 7060 (SERIES 1991)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO DIRECTING STAFF TO APPLY FOR A GRANT UNDER THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, for almost 30 years the City has had a master- plan
for development of Mission Plaza; and
WHEREAS, during that time that portion of Mission Plaza
between Chorro and Broad Street has been fully developed, and
that portion between Broad and Nipomo Street has been partially
developed; and
WHEREAS, the City is anxious to complete development of the
second phase of Mission Plaza; and
WHEREAS, the City has master plans for this development and
for many years has set aside $501000 /year for acquisition and
development of this area and has now accumulated over $200,000;
and
WHEREAS, the City is proposing to reconstruct a major bridge
at the Nipomo Street end of the Mission Plaza portion; and
WHEREAS, the bridge project will require mitigation of San
Luis Obispo-Creek; and'';
WHEREAS, the mitigation of the creek and the development of
Mission Plaza can be carried out at one time and jointly
beneficial to interests of all concerned, and the'conditions of _
an Environmental Enhancement Mitigation Grant.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo that:
1. The City possesses legal authority to apply for a grant and
to finance, acquire, and construct improvements.
2. The City will be able to maintain and operate-the acquired
property and the development in perpetuity.,
3. The'City will give the State's authorized representative
access%and� the right to examine all records, books, and
papers:related to the grant.
4. The City will be able to commence the project wthin'a
reasonable time after receipt of notification from the State
that funds have been approved and the City will be able to
carry. :the project to completion.with reasonable diligence.
R -7060
Resolution No. 7060 (1991 Series)
5. The City will comply with all provisions of the California.
Environmental Quality Act, California Relocation.Assistance
Act, and any other State and local laws, rules, or
regulations.
6. The City does hereby direct the Public Works Director as
agent for the City of San Luis Obispo to apply for the grant
and to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all
documents including, but not limited to, applications,
agreements, amendments, payment requests as may be necessary
to complete the project. Grant request to be $450,000.
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilman Roalman , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the following resolution was adopted this 10th day of December
1991.
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTE T:
Pame a Voges, Ci Y Clerk
tfve officer
Fi ance)Dir or
Community Community De meet Director
Public works Director
ymth s /"33
h �
( t
RESOLUTION NO. 7059 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2084
LOCATED AT 3523 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of•San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Tract 2059 and the Planning
Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof; makes the following findings:
1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements
are consistent with the general plan and specific plan for
Higuera.Commerce Park.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the C -S -SP zone:
3. The design of the tentative map and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause serious health
problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially
and.unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement .
will not conflict with easements for access through, or use
of property within, the proposed subdivision.
5. The Community Development Director has determined that
proposed subdivision is exempt from environmental review..
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map
for Tract 2084 be subject to the following conditions:
1. The subdivider shall submit a f -inal map fcn,,,a.w i; l and
recordation. z�
2. The final map shall note a blanket easement over the common
lot area, except under the structures,, df ,.,,, pderrground
,
public utilities serving the site, to -thy rove, of the
City Engineer and affected utility agencies,.{;.
3. The subdivider shall establish covenan s,condition and
restrictions for the regulation of land use control of
nuisances and architectural control of the building and
facilities. These CC &R's shall be approved by the Community
R -7059
C C
Resolution No. 7059 (1991 Series)
Tract 2084
Page 2
Development Director and administered by a property owners'
association.
4. There shall be no change in city - regulated provisions of the
CC &R's without prior approval of the Community.Development
Director.
5. The subdivider shall include the following provisions in the
CC &R's for the tract:
a. The property owners' association shall be created to
enforce the CC &R's and provide for professional,
perpetual maintenance of common areas, including, but
not limited to, the driveway, parking lot, landscaping,
sewer, utilities, and building exteriors.
b. The right shall be granted to the city to maintain
common areas if the property owners' association fails
to do so and to assess said association for expenses
incurred.
C. All parking spaces provided on the site shall be
available for use by all of the individual owners.
On motion of Councilman Reiss ,.
seconded by Councilwoman Rappa , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa,, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day
of December_ _F 1991.
A
CitylClerk Pam(Nges
Resolution No. 7059 (1991 Series)
Tract 2084
Page 3
APPROVED:
C istrative Officer
C.
o
C 5
I
e q /a
Eel
Fft
0
41)
7t
G4;PHICSCALE'
'o
50 1w
200 306 (M-FtANAkDAL DRIVE
VICINITY MAP
Tract 2081
NORTH
6r,
. a "� � ; �,
�� �
�� J
e ,�-�
.j
N
RESOLUTION NO. 7058
(1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S ACTION
TO DENY AN EXCEPTION TO -THE SIGN REGULATIONS TO ALLOW TWO PROPOSED OFF -
PREMISE SIGNS LOCATED AT 179 NORTH SANTA ROSA STREET AND 948 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD (ARC 91 -67).
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the appellants' application and
plans for two new freestanding, off- premise signs in connection
with the development of a new restaurant and office building at 179
North Santa Rosa Street (State Highway 1) ; and parking and driveway
improvements at an existing shopping center located at.948 Foothill
Boulevard, the appellants' statements, the Architectural Review
Commission's action, and staff recommendations and reports thereon,
hereby upholds the appeal and in so doing, approves the appellant's
request for two off - premise signs subject to the following findings
and conditions:
Findings
1. The proposed off - premise signs are consistent with the type
of signage allowed by the Sign Regulations in the C -R zone
and consisstant with prior signage approvals.
2. There are unusual site. conditions or exceptional
circumstances which apply to the site which warrant an
exception to the sign regulations. The properties at 179
North Santa Rosa Street and at 948 Foothill Boulevard are
under separate ownership but have been jointly planned in
terms of access, parking and circulation.
3. Approval of off- premise signs is necessary for the
appellants' reasonable and economically viable use of their
property.
R -7058
Conditions
1. The freestanding sign on Santa Rosa Street shall be setback
from the right -of -way to allow adequate sight distance for
motorists, to the approval of the City Engineer and the
Community Development Director.
2. Other than traffic directory signs, no additional
freestanding signs identifying the shopping center or the
restaurant shall be allowed on the Boysen Avenue, Santa
Rosa Street or Foothill Boulevard frontages.
3. Both signs shall be in conformance with Exhibit A,
attached.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,
seconded by - Councilwoman Pinard and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day
of December r 1991.
APPROVED:
ty A_ inistrative Officer
Attachment: Exhibit A
s
0
Q .o
., R1
s
0
N
Y
12' -0"
- 1
6' -0"
In . edor 1 lluminated (48 sq.ft) .
Shappin., Center Identification Sig
Half -Score
Ground Face
Concrete Block with
Raked Joints.
Interior Illuminated C&Ymt wttn
S mndatd 3'-8" Carl's Jr. Sign Fac
(24 sq.ft.)
- - Existing Grade
;kale: 1/4 " =1' -W
JOB No: PU- 9101. REV: 8- 14 -91,
DATE: 8 -1391 10 -7 -91
DRAWN: P.R. 10 -17 1.91
CH
Exhibit A
RESOLUTION NO. 7057 (1991 Series)
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF
SAN LUIS DRIVE RIGHT -OF -WAYS NORTHEAST OF CORRALITOS AVENUE,
ADJACENT TO 2097 SAN LUIS DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. It is the intention of the City of San Luis Obispo
to abandon portions of San Luis Drive, as shown on the map marked
Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by such
reference, pursuant to Section 8300 et. seq. of the Streets and
Highways Code.
SECTION 2. Copies of the map showing the particulars of the
proposed abandonments are also on file in the office of the City
Clerk, at 990 Palm Street.
SECTION 3.. Tuesday, January 7, 1992, at 7:05 p.m. in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California is the time and place set for hearing all persons
interested in or objecting to the proposed. abandonment, which time
is not less than fifteen (15) days from the passage of this
resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolution, together with the ayes and noes,
shall be published once in full at least ten (10) days before the
public hearing on the proposed street abandonments, in the
Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this
city.
SECTION S. The City Engineer shall post at least three (3)
notices of the - proposed abandonments in prominent locations near
R -7057
Council Resolution No. 7057 (1991 Series)
Page 2
the portion of the street to be abandoned at least fourteen (14)
days before the date set for the hearing in accordance with Section
8322 of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 6. The proceeding to be taken will be subject to
reservation by the city of public easements for utilities and
subject to such other conditions as the council deems appropriate.
SECTION 7. The City Engineer shall notify utility companies
affected by the proposed abandonments at least ten (10) days after
adoption of the Resolution of intention in accordance with Section
8347 of the Streets and Highways Code.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilman Roalman , and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: . None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd
day of
December
, 1991.
ATTEST:
'N Pam Voges,Nity Clerk
i�
Council Resolution No. 7057 (1991 Series)
Page 3
APPROVED:
V
1/ •, rJ/
��� \���
y
�,
._�s 'n ~.. ...
�..��, i
i
0
X LLJ
z
a
e
e
1 t
^ � t
^ 7
= e
t L
c
z a
k.
^y }A .q:
0 t .
L -
Q . oft' +�
VICINITY MAP 2097 SAN LUI DRIVE
SAN LUIS DRIVE .STREET ABANDONMENT
I
W _
z.
0
Z
W
m'
CC
Q
� 1
LU
c
Z
\
O
P
C
W
Q
a
C
t L
c
z a
k.
^y }A .q:
0 t .
L -
Q . oft' +�
VICINITY MAP 2097 SAN LUI DRIVE
SAN LUIS DRIVE .STREET ABANDONMENT
I
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
No.dv 84566
Ci
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; )
)} SS.
County of San Luis Obispo
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not
interested in the above - entitled matter
; I am now, and at all times embraced
in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal clerk
of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general cir-
culation, printed and published daily, Sundays excepted, at
the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county and
state; that notice
of which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy, was
published in the above -named newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof — on the following dates, to-Wit:
12/28
that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained and
established a newspaper of general circulation by Decree
entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County,
State of California, on June 9, 1952, under the provisions of
Chapter 1, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the
State of California.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the fore-
going iis/ true and correct.
U (Signature of principal Clerk)
Date 12/28 , 1991
CFTYOp
San cuts ostspo
f RESOLUTION NO. 7057
(1991 Series)
RESOLUTION OF
j INTENTION TO
ABANDON A PORTION
.
i OF SAN LUIS DRIVE -.
I RIGHT -OF -WAY;
NORTHEAST OF.
CORRALITOS AVENUE,
ADJACENT TO
2097 SAN LUIS DRIVE
(( BE IT RESOLVED by the
(Council of the City of San Luis'
Obispo es follows:
SECTION 1. It is the inten-
tion of the City of San Luis j
IObispo to abandon portions
Of San Luis Drive, as shown 1
on the map marked Exhibit I
"A attached .hereto and in-
corporated herein by such
reference, Pursuant to Sec-
tion 8300 at. seq. of the i
Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 2. Copies of the
map• showing the particulars .
fo the proposed abandon -
ments are also on file in the
office of the City Clerk, at 990
Palm Street.
SECTION 3. Tuesday, Janu-
ary 7, 1992, at 7:05 p.m. in the "
Council Chamber of the City
'Hall, 990 Palm Street, San
Luis Obispo, California is the
time and place set for hearing
all persons interested in or
objecting to the proposed
abandonment, which time is
not less than fifteen It 5) days
from the passage of this i
resolution.
SECTION 4, This resolu-
tion, together with the ayes
and noes, shall be published
once in full at least ten (10)
days before the public hear-
ing on the proposed street y
abaadppments, in e 1
gram- Tribune, a newspaper
Published and circulated in 1
I this city,
SECTION S. The City Engi-
neer shall post at least three i
(3) notices of-the proposed +
abandonments in prominent
locations near the portion of
the street to be abandoned at
(.least fourteen (14) days.be -.
fore the date set for, the
hearing in--accordance with I
- Section 8322 of the Streets i
and Highways Code. .
SECTION 6. The proceed - j
mg to be taken will be subject
to reservation oy the .city of
public easements. for utilities i
and subject to such other
conditions as the council
deems appropriate. '
SECTION 7. The Ciry Engi-
+ neer.shall notify utility compa.
nies affected. by the proposed
I abandonments at least ten'
10 0) days after adoption of the j
Resolution of Intention in
accordance with Section 8347
Of the Streets and Highways
Code.
_ On motion of Councilwom-
an Rappa, seconded by Coun-
I Gilman Roalman, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councllmembers Pi-
I' nard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman
and Mayor Dunin.
NOES: None
ABSENT: None.
the foregoing resolution was ;
.' :passed and adopted this 3rd
day of December,. 1991
By: /s /Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
By: /s/Pam Voges, City Clerk
+i0ec: 28, 1991- 69L656
RESOLUTION NO. 7056 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL CLAIM FOR MONEY FROM THE
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council.of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
1. To approve the 1991 -92 annual claim for local transportation
funds.
2. To authorize the Transit Manager to execute the appropriate
claim forms.
3. To direct the City Clerk to forward one executed copy of the
claim and a certified copy of this resolution to:
San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa seconded by
Councilman Roalman and on.the.following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of
December , 1991'.
R -7056
n
Page 2
Resolution No. 7056
(1991 Series)
n
ATTES
uje�x
City Clerk P oges
APPROVED:
city dministrative Officer
HW \tda.rpt.
z
F O
z�
W
Fp
�0
�zo
N �
w�m
q
�a
0
m `
N m
�R
V
N
F
C
O
N
19
R3
m
m
it
I
N
N
N �
O
I
g�
C`
F�
L,
Y
K
U fi e
U ^ �hpy
c
.. n
n
N
ZG .+
s � N
�i N AI
.. n
r
. K
i nF a K
a 6 1 �
.n n F
oq A
Y
R
h
p
N
A
�
Y;
Y d
9
P
y
W
L
a o
w
3
"a
�q
o
RA
fw
R
ATTACHMENT 1
Y;
9
P
y
W
ti
pppp
w
3
"a
�q
o
F
...
C
ATTACHMENT 1
��,
�' ��,r���Y� tip' �
�y ,, �
�� � ��
;�
f i +
7055
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING THE BIKEWAYS ELEMENT OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
1990 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo ( "City") has identified projects eligible for
funding through the State's Bike Lane Account administered by CalTrans and
WHEREAS, CalTrans requires that local jurisdictions have regional and state
approval of their local bikeways plan in order to be eligible for these and other funds; and
WHEREAS, the City's existing bikeways plan does. not have regional or state
approval and the bikeways element of the Regional Transportation Plan does have state
approval; and
WHEREAS, by adopting the Regional Transportation Plan's bikeways element the .
City would be eligible for funds administered by CalTrans;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
does hereby adopt the bikeways element of the San Luis Obispo County 1990 Regional
Transportation Plan attached and herein incorporated as Exhibit "A ".
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,seconded by Councilman
Reiss , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES`. None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day of November , 1991.
W
Clerk PA Voges
ayor Ron Dunin
R -7055
r ,
7055
Page 2: Resolution (1991 Series)
APPROVED:
City A strative icer
bid—
At or
Finance Director
Community Dev o ment Director
1990 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
BIIMEW1YS ELEKENT ><
yr
�s
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCT ION .............. ............................... ....F -1
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES .............. ............................F -1
KEY ISSUES ............................................................. F-5
Bike Population ......................... ............................F -6
Average Trip Length ..................... ............................F -7
Existing Traffic Problems ............... ............................F -8
Bike Safety .............................. ...........................F -10
Citations................................ ...........................F -11
Mieft •• .F -11 r
s� Bike Facilities .......................... ...........................F -12
Bikeways................................. ...........................F -12 �<
BusBike Racks ........................... ...........................F -16 #r
Parkand Ride Lots ....................... ...........................F -16
`• BIKE FUNDING. ........................
FederalFin iing .................. ........... ........................ F -17 .
StateFunding...... ........ }<
............... .... ......................F -17
LocalFunding .......................................................
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS. • . . ........ ...........................F -20
} Creative Solutions for San Luis Obispo ... ...........................F -23
Local vs. Regional Goals and Policies .... ...........................F -25 �<
BIKEPFD' TS ............................... ...........................F -26 �
CwtProjects ........................ .............F -26
Recreational Projects.. .............. .F -28
APPENDIX {
RoadInventory and Area Maps ............. ...........................AA -1 ~
Bikeways Financial Breakdown ............. ...........................BB -1
rr
{
1 1 xv
rh
��vvvvv_v_xxvxvr •{}vtix .vx: _ _ .vvxxyx • i
•.� ....•.:s - {:•;_•.vv:::: _ . r:`v,.•' }::•' > :'v' :•.•$_ x..::{}.}'hr ;?L }::�� vx- n:.vp:.vxti xmti:.lv.$••_�'�G ?. v +}n -•'� xrw�n".xii�'G
r:L : ?= :vvLii2i<•:u =:ti r =': .. . �� �:: rr. G:• .v.� _ },. r: •.; r:. i_ .ti :::: � i4 •r: r: :.: {: v. - "••riyivr: r.•:•r -�•
{:,.. v,:{;xs ...•_• ::.,fi+ a:S•s ` b�-'- r': c:' toc�: �, �s. •_,�.'{= _;r:::•::= ::::::�:::�:� \ u.' �. SC: a�:aativ�ttiio?,��:,..tiS.��:a:�:{
1990 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
BIKEWAYS ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the use of bicycles has increased for commuter and recreational use. The bike mode is
a positive alternative to car travel given concerns of pollution, congestion, and the lack of funding for road
construction and maintenance. This element presents the existing conditions surrounding bike use and
recommends objectives and policies to address these conditions. This element is to be used as a policy
guide for bikeway improvements and to identify priority projects to carry out funding becomes available.
The development of this element involved researching other counties' elements, compiling data from city
and regional sources, and working with the bike community. This helped formulate a comprehensive
understanding of bicycle issues. Improvements are recommended to serve present and future commuter
and recreational bicyclists. This element includes the following topics:
A. Goals and Policies - List of projects to be constructed or carried out.
B. Accomplishments since 1986 RTP.
C. Key Issues - Bicyclist populations, traffic problems, bike safety, and theft, bike support facilities
and amenities.
D. Bike Funding Options- Federal, state, and local.
E. Creative Solutions - Hotel guest provisions, bike safety programs, Bicycle Coordinator or
Committee.
F. Solutions Recommended for San Luis Obispo region..
G. Local vs. Regional Goals and Policies - Conflicting/similargoals.
H. Proposed Bicycle Projects.
This plan incorporates the goals and policies of the Air Pollution Control District's (APCD) mitigation strategy
plans for reducing car trips in the San Luis Obispo region. Regional air pollution levels have been steadily
increasing, as a direct result of growth and car use. Various strategies encourage alternative transportation
modes for residents' main way of travel. Bicycle use is a favored option, particularly for convenience and
Work trips of 5 miles or less.
The Area Council encourages implementation of the APCD's Clean Air Plan, which has proposed that within
5 years, bikes should make up 10% of all trips 5 miles or less made county wide. Trips made around the
colleges and popular recreation areas, such as Avila Beach, should be made by bicycle to achieve greater
modal shifts.
Bicycle use is a positive alternative transportation mode. The increase in bike travel could lead to
reductions in air and noise pollution and would reduce the need to add major road lanes and parking
spaces. The projects and programs proposed in this element have been designed to meet this objective.
GOALS. OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Goals and Policies reflect the progressive direction of bike systems in this region. They have been directed
towards increasing the number of bicycle commuters in the county and providing them a safe and efficient
system in which to travel.
F -1
Overall Goal
The goal of the Bikeways Element is to provide a safe and efficient regional pathway system that promotes
cycling and walking. Four important objectives in realizing this goal involve a regional bikeway system,
safety, efficiency /convenience, and new construction..
Obiectives and Policies
1. Regional Bikeway System. Create a regional bikeway system to provide for efficient and safe
transportation for bicycle commuters.
a Create a coordinated and connected regional bikeway system with emphasis on completing gaps
of regional system where bikeways end or are in disrepair.
b. Encourage placement of bike facilities (lockers, bike signs, racks) at Park and Ride and Bike and
Ride stops.
C. Encourage local jurisdictions and major employers to provide bicycle parking facilities at major
dest- ination points such as shopping centers, public facilities; transit hubs; and park- and -ride lots
to increase the use of bicycles in split -mode travel choice.
d. Encourage implementation of signal- actuating mechanisms for bikes on all signals.
e. Work with the local, regional, and state jurisdictions,: to conform to regionally accepted definitions
for Classes I, II, and III bikeways, as defined_ by the Caltrans' Streets and Highways Code of the
Highway Design Manual
2. Education Dissemination. To Provide Information and education to commuter and recreational riders.
a Area Council to publish an annually updated bikeways map to designate bike routes, paths, and
lanes for commuter and recreational riders. The map should be funded through cooperation of
private and public funding sources.
b. Publish a brochure on bike issues such as safety; bike facility locations, bikeway providers, bike
clubs, and other useful references-for widespread distribution to bike shops, Caltrans, gyms,
Chamber of Commerce, Cal Poly, Cuesta, and downtown businesses.
C. Incorporate bikeways issues, such as bike map publications, meetings, and grant application
deadlines into the Area Council Newsletter, public service announcements, and media press
releases.
d. Encourage implementation of Bike Safety Programs in all State Funded programs, such as Drivers
Education and Traffic School Programs.
I Safe Bikeway Improvements: Provide safe travel for both the commuter and the recreational riders.
a Encourage all new and improved development to include facilities such as racks, lockers, bike
and ride stops, and 5'-8' bikeways along all new collectors, arterials, and bridges where terrain
permits. Width and class should be determined by factors such as vehicle speed, traffic volumes,
and road width
F -2
C
b. Encourage adherenceto Highway Design Manual's (Topic 1003 -1004) criteria for bikeway needs
with Class I, being a totally separated path, used most frequently in high traffic volume, high
speed areas; Class II to include a striped division between traffic and separated bike path,
signage, and stenciled bike symbol on pavement throughout the system; and Class III bike route
signed by a sign in areas where Class I and Class 11 are not deemed feasible.
C. Encourage prohibition of obstructions, such as parallel bar drainage grates, light posts,
mailboxes, or signage that may obstruct the bicyclist route.
d. Clearly and frequently mark all signs, symbols, and lane stripes as directed in the Highway Design
Manual.
e. Encourage cities /county/state to program funds to improve identified bike /automobile conflict
problem areas.
f. Encourage the appropriate agencies to address heavily used bikeways with detoured paths and
separations, and to implement reduced speed areas with speed bumps or signage.
g. Encourage increased enforcement of bicycle violations especially in heavy traffic areas and
throughout the evening hours.
4. Bicycle Safety Program. Increase efforts and coordination with community groups and police
departments to implement yearly bike safety programs to all regional schools.
a. Encourage annual programs for grades K-8 to be conducted by either the police department or
a bicycle coordinator.
b. Encourage all WOW week participants at Cal Poly to attend a Bike Information Meeting where
rules can be discussed, brochures disseminated, and bikes can be registered by the Cal Poly .
Police Department.
C. Prepare an information packet to be disseminated to all Cuesta College, Cal Poly, and regional
high school students that would include bike safety and citation information.
d. Pursue annual use of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds stipulated for use on bicycle
safety education programs encourage hiring, of a bicycle coordinator to implement these
programs.
S. Bike and Ride Service. Implement and market Bike and Ride Services on all foxed regional transit routes.
a. Implement programs with bike racks on buses in Winter, 1991 on all foxed regional routes.
b. Encourage installation of bike facilities (lockers, schedules, racks) and signs signifying Bike and
Ride stops.
C. Encourage Transit Managers to undertake a continual marketing strategy to inform people of the
service.
6. Funding. Encourage all local and regional jurisdictions to seek funding sources for bike facility
improvements.
F-3
a. Provide technical assistance to entities preparing bikeway funding proposals.
b. Update information on funding alternatives as new sources arise and old sources expire.
C. Continue to use the full 2% allotment of TDA funds for bike projects, and promote jurisdictional
use of TDA apportionment, (Article 8) for bike projects.
d. Increase the number of applications submitted for bikeways facilities by 5 applications each year.
e. Encourage jurisdictions to pursue all sources of applicable funding for commuter, recreational,
and safety and educational programs.
7. Coordinator. Creation of a Coordinator position who would review all bike facilities' requests-and submit
them for final.approval to the appropriate funding entity.
a. iEncourage Cal Poly and Cuesta College to choose a bicycle Coordinator who can implement a
separate policy and action plan for Cal Poly commuters and campus; plans.
b. Annually educate employers, with 25 or more employees, on commuter bicycle programs done
in other communities and how implementation of programs work..
C. Expand the opportunity to educate riders on safety and relevant bike issues at fairs, rallies,
triatholons, and other public events.
d. Encourage appropriate agencies to install demand signalization mechanisms for bikes at
intersections involving busy main streets, and routinely check if those in place are in working
order.
S. Modal Shift. Encourage use of bikes as an alternative transportation mode according to Air Pollution .
Control District's mitigation strategies to reduce Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel.
a. Encourage modal shift within 5 years to have bicycle trips make up 100 of all short trips of 5
miles or less.
b. Encourage employers with 25 or more employees to reduce SOV travel, by a set reduction over
the next 5 years, which would be directed by a coordinated program that emphasizes bike use.
c: Encourage jurisdictions to implement, policies mandating new and existing facilities to install
Showers and lockers for bike commuter use.
d. Encourage Cal Poly to limit the sale of parking permits to students, faculty, and sta_ ff; and to
construct a separated bike path infrastructure within the campus.
e. Monitor the modes.by which people travel in this region by conducting a biennial transportation
survey throughout the region..
f. Encourage a region wide policy for all'new and expanding private and public development to
install one bike rack parking space per every ten car parking spaces.
g. Encourage greater participation in Bike to Work Day, held in October or May, and increase
awareness during that day with sponsored bike oriented activities, such as rallies, exhibits, and
fairs.
F-4
h. Encourage county wide implementation of any future Transportation Reduction Ordinance
sponsored by the APCD.
Encourage a bike pool program at all work places for daily short range work or personal type
trips.
Encourage equipment check outs with the bike pool to accommodate the rider with locks, helmet,
rain gear, and carrying capacity baskets or panniers.
9. Recreation. Pursue plans to increase Class 1 bikeways
along appropriate coastal frontage, Riparian trails, and routes throughout the region.
a Encourage increased bike access to coastal areas and pedestrian trails with applications to be
submitted for funding through grants by the Land Conservancy Coastal Act.
10. Acquisition of Rights of Wad Explore new alternatives for Rights of way and easements to be used
for bike paths.
a Encourage participation in the planning review process for projects involving installation of utility,
water, or oil pipelines to increase rights of ways to be used for bike paths.
11. Outside Regional Links: Establish commuter links outside this region to provide bikeways for those
commuting between the two regions.
a Encourage joint projects with Santa Barbara and Monterey counties to provide bikeways uniting
the two areas.
Accomplishments Since 1988 RTP
The last, Regional Transportation Plan's (RTP) Bike Plan was adopted in 1988. The RTP must be updated
every 2 years according to State mandate. A biennial review allows for an analysis of the progress made
and assesses the need for newly recommended future projects. Since 1988, some of the projects have
been started. or completed. A comprehensive inventory was conducted to analyze the newly proposed
regional bike projects, which included the roll over projects from 1988 and all the newly proposed projects.
This inventory can be found in Aooend'rx AA -1.
KEY ISSUES
Bicycle oriented projects are usually,priorrtied by purpose. Commuter purposes are emphasized usually
over recreational oriented purposes. Commuter bikeways and facilities constitute any facilities that aide a
person using a bike for a primary purpose trip, such. as school, work, or a maintained daily activity.
Recreational trips are any trips designed to provide outdoor fun and.exercise or for non primary trips, such
as the beach, a county lake, or a ride through a country side. Commuter :trips usually have priority over
recreational trips for funding and construction..
There are several other key issues involved when considering why bicycle travel is important to this region,
as well as, what can be done to make cycling safer. 'Many of these following reasons contribute to
justifying a more efficient regional transportation network. The following issues concern air pollution,
existing bicycle populations, existing traffic problems, bike safety, citations, bike safety programs, theft, and
bike facilities.
F -5
Air Pollution
Over 60% of pollutants (nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxides, hydrocarbons) emitted in a 5 mile trip are
produced during the cold start period, or the first 4 minutes of an auto's operation.
In a recent San Luis Obispo city transportation survey, 73% of the respondents said that they would be
willing to reduce their use of automobiles to reduce air pollution and congestion. Of this total, 60% said
they would be willing to reduce their vehicle use by at least 10 %.
The greatest emission of pollutants occurs as a direct result of car use. If a person, rode one of their
commuter trips (10 mile round trip) on a bike one time per week, the rider could avoid emitting up to 1,100
pounds of carbon dioxide each year. According to the APCD, the following emissions may be expected
to be avoided because of the construction and improvement of recommended bikeways in this region.
Pollutant
Reactive Organic Gases
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulate Matter -10
Percent Reduction
Reductions in Tons per Day
1994
1997
2000
0.101
0.188
0.153
0.095
0.212
0.187
0.295
0.778
0.822.
4.00 10.00 10.00
These calculations have been based on the percentage of emissions that would be reduced as a result of
a modal shift from the use of single occupant vehicles to the use of a bicycle for daily non recreational trips.
Bicycle Population
In the United States, there are about 93 million bicycles, but only one in 40 bikes is used for commuting
(Transportation Article, New Age Joumao. Annually, there are an average of 8,575 bikes sold in San Luis
Obispo County. It is estimated that 90% of those bikes sold are for use in this region. This figure has
escalated every year. Cal Poly has a high bicycle ridership with approximately 3,000 bikes from the dorms
and an additional 2,300 bikes coming on campus daily. In the grade schools, approximately 8% of the
children are riding bicycles to elementary schools, 11 % riding to junior high schools, and 4% riding to
Senior high schools.
Various schools throughout the region have been surveyed on bike issues. Questions centered on how
children got to school, how many bikes were on school grounds that day, and if they had a bike safety
program. Out of the total students attending schools in the region, there are a small percentage riding their
bikes. A majority of students gets rides to schools from their parents, and a smaller percentage walk or
take the school bus. Bike rider totals are shown in Figure F -1.
According to a recent San Luis Obispo City survey, 9.8% of the 637 survey respondents rode bikes for
transportation. Of the same total respondents (655j, 18.2% of the student respondents rode bikes for
primary purpose trips. Students rode about 2 times more than permanent city residents. From the same
survey, 31.3% said that they ride a bicycle at least one tithe per week. Of that total, 15.8% used bikes for
work or school, and 12% for shopping or entertainment. These figures reveal that bike travel could make
up a significant amount of transportation trips N they can be used frequently for short range trips.
UP
SCHOOL AREAS
FIGURE F -1
INVENTORY OF REGIONAL SCHOOLS BIKE COUNTS
ELEMENTARY JUNIOR HIGH SENIOR HIGH
SCHOOL SCHOOL SCHOOL
COLLEGE
North County
127 out of 2062
75 out of 860
51 out of 1636
1.75
Mission
6%
9'k
3%
2.25
North Coastal
128 out of 1646
50 out of 433
7 out of 253
Cal Poly
SLO
8%
6%
3%
Spyglass Village
an Luis Obispo
232 out of 1949
100 out of 640
57 out of 1413
South Bay Blvd.
Bay
12%
16%
4%
Mission
South County
205 out of 3216
45 out of 589
25 out of 265
Trader Nicks
PB
6%
8%
9%
4th & Grand Ave.
Cuesta College
Festival Cinemas
AG
4.5
100 out of 5800
GC
Halcyon Post Office
AG
4.0
2%
Cal Poly University
Los Berros /Pomeroy
N
4.5
5000 out of 16,050
SM
El Camino Real/Casada
SM
225
31%
Average Trio Lenath
An average bicycle trip length of 5 miles has been considered reasonable for healthy people in good
weather when no severe grades must be confronted. This guide would include most trips within each city
and also some regional routes, As a sample, Figure F -2 shows some trips that are within this 5 mile range.
ORIGIN
FIGURE F -2
SHORT TRIPS EQUALING 5 MILES OR LESS
Area DESTINATION Area
Mi.
Mission
SLO
Cal Poly
SLO
1.75
Mission
SLO
Laguna Lake
SLO
2.25
Los Osos Valley Rd. LO
Ouintano Rd.
MB
3.5
Cal Poly
SLO
Cuesta College
SLO
5.0
Spyglass Village
PB
Oak Park Blvd.
AG
4.0
South Bay Blvd.
Bay
Montana be Oro
LO
4.75
Mission
SLO
Walters Center
SLO
4.0
Trader Nicks
PB
4th St. & Grand Ave.
AG
2.0
4th & Grand Ave.
GC
Festival Cinemas
AG
4.5
Pacific Blvd.
GC
Halcyon Post Office
AG
4.0
Fair Oaks/Valley
AG
Los Berros /Pomeroy
N
4.5
El Camino Real
SM
El Camino Real/Casada
SM
225
F -7
The San Luis Obispo APCD Transportation survey identified the following trip types for all trips that were
up to 5 miles in length:
52% Primary trips (Work or Sch000,
74% Grocery trips.
40% Other shopping trips,
12% Weekend trips:.
To accommodate these trips, security facilities (bike lockers, racks) should be provided at the appropriate
Areas. Facilities such as showers and bike racks on .buses should be provided where there are busy
activity centers. Safe bikeways also need to be provided on heavily used commuter or parallel routes to
enhance safety for those riding bikes to work or school.
Existing Traffic Problems
Road_ conditions and conflicts with vehicles - On- street parking can be a hazard to cyclists and may
encroach upon the safe shoulder in which the cyclists ride. A major problem with on- street parking is
drivers opening their car door without looking for on- coming cyclists, which may result with a rider being
clipped. On- street parking also can cause an obstructed view to the drivers pulling out of driveways
perpendicular to the parking and the street. Usually, this leads to the driver inching out slowly into traffic
and blocking the cyclists' bikeway, or the driver may speed up to get into the traffic lane, which also poses
an obvious danger to the cyclist. Some jurisdictions have eliminated on- street parking to insure safe bike
passage on popular bike routes. A major benefit of increased commuter bicycle use is a reduced need
for car parking spaces.
Parked delivery trucks and large vehicles - Cyclists must veer out of the bikeway into the vehicle lane to
go around the larger vehicles parked next to the curb, which places the cyclist in danger. The cyclist must
then enter the vehicle lane and travel with the vehicles for distance. When a cyclist joins the vehicle traffic,
the cyclist should act and be treated as a vehicle using the entire lane to.insure safe passage.
High speed, high _volume traffic - The higher the_ speeds the greater the impact will be on a cyclist when
he /she has been hit. Class I bike lanes (a separated Path) or wide Class 11 bike lanes (a stenciled and
striped bike lane) placed adjacentto high speed, high volume corridors reduce the danger to cyclists riding
these areas. Narrower Class II or Class III bikeways, which integrate with traffic flows, are more common
bikeways for less congested, slower roadways.
Interpretations on what fachies are safe - There is disagreement regarding what is safe riding procedures
within the bicycle community. When bikeways have not been designated, some enthusiasts feel that it is
safer to ride within the vehicle lanes, and to assume the role of a vehicle. Others feel that it is safer to ride
as close to the curb or parking lane when there is no bikeway designation. These different interpretations
cause confusion for the car drivers and the other cyclists. It is important to work with both camps before
implementing plan decisions to represent both opinions to a greater extent.
Non - continuous_ bikeways - Many bikeways may .have full shoulder allotment for most the way, but end
suddenly with no warning to the autos or bicycles, putting the cyclist unexpectedly into traffic. The
bikeways may end because the resurfacing project ended at that point, or there was no room on the road
side to widen it because of terrain constraints. Resurfacing projects are also a common problem where only
a portion of the shoulder has been resurfaced, leaving an uneven surface with which the cyclist must
contend. Some jurisdictions have used a Bike Coordinator or Bike Committee to oversee resurfacing
projects to ensure that an entire shoulder has a smooth surface.
F-8
h
Drainage grates - Grates located in the gutters or bikeways are hazardous for cyclists 4 they have a parallel
grate lying parallel with the street. Grates grab bike tires and do not allow the tire to roll out of the grate,
but freeze the: motion of the bicycle, thus causing the bicyclists to fall down. There have been efforts to
install different grates or cross bars on existing unsafe grates or realign grate bars to be perpendicular to
the traffic flow.
Intersection Channelization - Another common confect between cyclists and vehicles occur in turning lanes.
Some innovative methods used to rectify this confusion by setting the right turn lane back by ten feet, thus
allowing the vehicles a clear view of cyclists in front of them in the bike lane. Caltrans has specified
intersection design guidelines that integrate cyclists into the design, as shown in Figure F3. This
shortened vehicle lane reduces the confusion experienced by both cyclists and drivers. Right turns from
the far right lane are confusing as to whom has the right of way. Vehicles often go in front of a stopped
cyclist and proceed with their right turn This is the proper way for a vehicle to proceed. Dashed lines
placed along the bike lane near a right turn indicate that a car may enter this space to make a right turn.
Cyclists should be aware that it is safer to allow the car to go in front This reduces the chances of a dare
devil cyclist squeezing by on the "vehicle's blind side. If they do cut by, cyclists run the possibility of.being
caught in the driver's blind spot or being side swiped The safe and legal, method for making right turns
should be communicated to drivers and cyclists through education programs and understandable sighs.
FIGURE F3
SETBACK FOR VEHICLE TURNING
Vehicle Turning Lab Setback
Sib L.n.
QOOr�llt
10 "Sgtlm4
V.I,ICt. L.n.
12
4a
Figure F3 shows the. shortened turning lane, which provides a clear view of bicyclists in the bike lane.
For turns going from a middle lane turning left, a cyclist should assume the role of a vehicle at the
beginning of the turn. While executing the turn, the cyclist should veer toward the right side of the turning
lane to open the lane for motorized vehicles. Cyclists should signal appropriately to let the surrounding
vehicles know of their intentions as they change from the far side bike lanes to get to the turning lane.
All these problems pose dangers to the cyclists. Correct and quick assessment helps to remedy the
situation. There is not always time to do this when one has to assess the road conditions, the possible
actions of drivers in parked cars, and the actions of high speed drivers in the adjacent lane. These
concerns should be addressed in Bicycle Safety. Programs and in future rectifying policies.
F -9
Bike. Safety
�.J
Bike safety should be a primary concern for all motorists and cyclists. The transportation survey revealed
that 23% of respondents would not ride a bike because it was too unsafe. In the City of San Luis Obispo
from 1985 to 1989, there were a total of 323 accidents reported involving bicycles, with an. average of 65
accidents per year. It is estimated that there are several more accidents per year that have not been
reported..
The most frequent causes of bike accidents reported are:
• Bicyclists riding on wrong side of road opposing traffic .
• Bicyclists running stop signs and stop lights
• Vehicles fairing to move into the bicycle lane when making a right hand turn lane
• Parked Motorists not looking as they open car doors
*-Vehicles failing to yield right -of -way to bicyclists
* No lights on bicycles at night
The areas where bike accidents occur most frequently have been reported by the local police, sheriff, and
CHP departments as being:
San Luis Obispo:
• Foothill Blvd. Avila Beach:
• Los Osos Valley Rd. * San Luis Bay Dr.
• California St.
• Downtown Area Santa Margarita:
'Grand Avenue * Route 58
Atascadero:
Paso Robles:
• El Camino Real
* Niblick Bridge
• Portola
* River Road
* 13th St. Bridge
Templeton:
• Old County Road
Arroyo Grande:
• Bethel Rd.
* Grand Ave.
• Florence St.
* 4th SL
• Vineyard Dr.
* Oak Park
• Las Tablas Rd.
* Branch St,
Niporm Morro Bay /Los Osos:
* Los Berros * South Bay Blvd.
' Pomeroy * State Park Rd.
Bicycle. Helmets in California all children under 6 years old have been required to wear a,protective bike
helmet. In several jurisdictions, the mandatory helmet law has extended to all people riding a bike.
Helmets are mandatory in all bike races and bicycle oriented athletic events. Large employers who are
advocating bike riding as part of their trip reduction program should provide helmets to all riding
employees. Use of bike helmets may reduce the possibility of .severe head injury by 85 %.
Citations
Citations for bicyclists are increasing. The fine for a cyclist running a stop, sign is now $33, for a car the
same violation may be $88. Some local Police departments say that they could write 10 or 20 times as
many citations to bicyclists, if they had the available manpower and time.
F -10
According to a recent police survey done locally, people responded that they would like to see much more
attention given to bicyclist violations. In 1989, 500 bicycle citations were given in the City of San Luis
Obispo.
The most frequent reasons for such citations are:
• Running stop lights
• Riding on the wrong side of the street
• Riding at night without a light
• Any violation applying to a vehicle also apply to a bicycle
Bike Safety Programs
Throughout the County, programs inform grade school students about bike safety. These programs are
usually being conducted annually for the K-6th graders by either the local Police Department, AAA, or the
school's principal. Schools in the unincorporated areas or smaller size schools sometimes leave out the
program. The bicycle safety program is not being instituted continuously in the region's grade schools.
Both colleges in this region also neglect to offer bicycle safety programs to new students.
Issues addressed in bike safety programs include hazardous conditions; appropriate right and left turn .
procedures, safe riding procedures, dangerous accident areas for cyclists, and facts concerning bike
facilities. Several funding sources are available for bicycle safety programs, but are not being applied now
for in this region.
Bike safety programs are being implemented throughout the state: Programs are being instituted usually
by a local Bicycle Coordinator who maintains their regularity and reviews the programs' success. In Davis,
college students take a course on bike safety in their freshmen year. In Santa Cruz, the County
Transportation Commission sponsors a bicycle safety program for all elementary grade schools, community
groups, juvenile traffic offenders, and transit drivers. They also expanded their program to include
information in driver training courses and supplying information to bicycle oriented businesses to educate
high school and adult cyclists.
Theft
In the city of San Luis Obispo in 1989, 300 bike thefts were reported. This total is low because law
enforcement a9encies generally do not list bike thefts separately from general thefts and many bike thefts
go unreported.
Police departments estimate thefts are high throughout the county and are getting higher. In 1989,
$100,000 in bikes and bike parts were stolen in San Luis Obispo. Of that, $40,000 of the thefts occurred
on the Cal Poly campus. Recoveries are low, due to lack of registration identification numbers and there
are few claim reports made by the owners.
With the increased purchases of expensive bikes, thefts have become a big concern for the rider. Bike
registration programs are being instituted by almost all the Police Departments in the county, as well as Cal
Poly.. Fees for the service range from free to $2 a year for a two or three year registration.
The bike serial numbers are being entered into a state record keeping. system. Police Departments feel
that recoveries of stolen bikes would be much greater I more bikes are being registered. In 1989, Pismo
Beach's Police Department registered 17 bicycles attheir station, San Luis Obispo registered 100, and Cal
Poly with their free program registered only 300 out of the 3000 bikes estimated at the residence halls.
Bike racks placed in greater numbers at busy bike areas reduce the chances owners needing to lock their
bikes to railings, trees, and other inappropriate objects. Busy bike areas are schools, downtown districts,
libraries, work places, markets, and places of business.
F -11
I
Road Facilities
Road facilities for bicycle travel include design and specification of bikeways, as well as their conditions and
who is responsible for carrying out the specifications. It is important that jurisdictions note the subtle
differences between bikeway classifications and implement the correct usage into their bikeways plans and
circulation elements.
Senate Bill 244, 1975
Senate Bill 244 (Statutes of 1975) established the California
Bikeways Act. The Act included provisions requiring the state
Department of Transportation to establish "recommended minimum
general design criteria for the development, planning, and
construction of bikeways...° (reference: Section 2375, Streets
and Highways Code) and !'uniform specification and symbols for
signs, markers and traffic control devices to control bicycle
traffic..." (reference: section 2375, Streets and Highways
Code.) Section 2376 of the Streets and Highways Code requires
all local and regional agencies,.having responsibility for the
development of bikeways, to comply with "all minimum safety
design criteria and uniform specifications and symbols for
signs, markers and traffic control devices established by the
Department..." Such design criteria and specifications are
contained in CALTRANS' Highway Design Manual.
Bikeways
There are three standard bikeway classifications contained in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, which
local, county, regional, and state jurisdictions are being required to follow. The diagrams below show the
Caltrans's bikeway classes and are being defined as follows:
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path),provides a completely separated right -of -way designated for the exclusive
use of bicycles and pedestrians with motorist cross -flows minimized Class I Paths in this county can be
found along Shell Beach's northern frontage road and Cayucos Ocean Front path across the bridge.
Tyro -way paths have standards of 8 feet and 5 feet for a one -way path. Paths include a 2 foot wide
graded area adjacent to either edge of the path.
Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane) provides a restricted right -of -way' designated. for the exclusive or
semi exclusive use of bicycles with travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited. Cross -flows by
pedestrians and motorists are being permitted within the lane. There should also be signage (R81 sign
According to the Traffic Manual) and a stenciled bike symbol on the asphalt pavement The adopted
criteria recommended that the.lanes should have a minimum width of 4 feet wide when located along
roads prohibiting parking, and ,5 feet wide where there is parallel parking. Striping should signify the
division between parking, the bike lane, and the vehicle lane.
Class III Bikeway (Bike Route) provides a right -of -way designated by bike route signs (G93 sign
according to the Traffic Manual) and is shared with pedestrian or motorists. Most bike. routes have signs
and share lanes with traffic flows. These routes provide primarily a continual link between Class 1 and
II bikeways.
Uniform Signs, Markings, and Traffic Control Devices and the standards required for each bikeway
classification definition is in the Highway Design Manual, Topic 1004.
F -12
Three levels of government in San Luis Obispo County are responsible for establishing bikeways. Caltrans
is responsible for the state highways. County Engineering is responsible for county roads, and local
engineering and public works agencies are responsible for city roads. Each jurisdiction may have their own
set of policies guiding bikeways implementation. This can become complex when requesting one standard
for all jurisdictions. It is essential.for one standard to be maintained so that all jurisdictions may be eligible
for bicycle grant money. The majority of,grants requires that the Circulation Plans specify the standard for
bikeways to adhere to the Caltrans' Design Manual's specifications as noted above.
In San Luis Obispo County, the Templeton Community Design Plan and San Luis Obispo City Circulation
Element contain Class I, 11, and III standards that are similar to those used by Caltrans and the Federal
Highway Administration. Their standard for Class II Bikeways requires -a stenciled bike symbol on the
pavement and a 6- striped dividing line. The Class 11 standard for other jurisdictions, such as Pismo Beach,
Grover City, Arroyo Grande, and Morro Bay, only requires a striped line. The Class III standard lot these
jurisdictions requires a stencil symbol on the pavement and/or a bike route sign. Consistent standards
increase bicyclists' safety and assist in implementing bikeways construction.
Currently, Caltrans will resurface state highway shoulders out to the edge of the existing pavement. Caltrans
permits riding on the shoulders of most highways in this region. Shoulders are considered as part of new
construction or rehabilitation projects. Design exemptions may apply to this provision. Terrain constraints,
archeological sites, or sensitive environments are such exemptions. The federal standard, (generally a 4
to 8 foot shoulder minimum) is required when constructing a rehabilitation project. Again design exemptions
may apply to set aside this requiremerTL It is important that a bicycle coordinator be hired to oversee such
rehabilitation or construction projects to insure that proper widths and conditions spelled out, by Caltrans,
be adhered.
Bike
Sidewalk Motor Vehicle Lane$
Path
,..a.
1o$ CLASS i siKE PATH
SEPARATED
BIKEWAYS CLASSIFICATION:
F -13
CLASS I BIKE PATH
91IE EINE I � -?
i 03
I�
R81
•'^ BILF FIME
T Sulw.re tr a a-
4y
I
Blke Lane Motor Vehicle Lanes bike Lane
4' Min. ♦•. Min.
CLASS ELA BWE LANE.
ADJACENT TO PAF NG
SIZEE —LIME ('?
Amu vR
. su.,a,m,i•.e-
Bike Lane
Motor Vehicle Lanes Bike Lane
41 n.
4' min.
CLASS M-B BIICE LANE
ADJACENT TO CURB, NO PARVJNG
BIKEWAYS CLASSIFICATION: CLASS II BIKE LANES
F -14
Siff LINE CLaSSII-C BIKE LANES
ADJACENT TO UNPAVED SHOULDER
0
R81
BIKE LIXE
Li T
-----------
Bike
sho61d•, Lane Motor Vehicle Lanes Bike
4• min. L-ane
o w-n.
[BIKE-WAYS CLASSIFICATION: CLASS 11-C BIKE LANES
t
Gu
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE
SHARED ROUTE WR CARS &
PARKING
A� 7f —7 Al' - -- -
P.1kin, L... Bike Bike P.11,1.9
Route Motor Vehicle Lanes Route 8•
min.
I' Min.
BIKEWAYS CLASSIFICATION: CLASS III BIKE ROUTE
F =15
l
The bikeway must adhere to the elements stated above for Class I, 11, or III to be considered a bikeway.
Bikeways are not always guaranteed when doing construction on existing or new roads. Some jurisdictions
have found supplemental funding, such as grants from the Transportation Development Actor local General
Funds, which have are being used to complete or solely fund plans for bikeways. Grants have completely
funded separate Class I paths and Class II lanes in this region.
Some roads and highways already provide shoulders. As mentioned, shoulders do not constitute a
bikeway. Some shoulders are available for riding, but are not being maintained as a bikeway and may not
have consistent widths or provisions usually found under the bikeways' classification criteria
Demand management techniques are important for improving efficiency for bike commuters. Such
techniques include demand signalization, which allows bicyclists to increase the signal time by rolling their
bike over a pressure sensitive mechanism. The mechanism is being placed below the asphalt layeri and
may sometimes become inactive. These mechanisms are especially important at demand signaliization
intersections where one street has continuously busy traffic and the intersecting street is sparsely being
used. Appropriate agencies need to review all requests for demand management tools including the bike
demand signai¢ation mechanisms and need to maintain those in place in good working order.
Bike Utility Facilities
Other facilities that aid commuter riders include bike racks on buses, park and ride lot lockers, bike racks,
bike lockers at busy activity centers, and amenities such as showers and equipment check out to aide
riders in their commuting efforts.
Bus Bike Racks
A Bike and Ride system 'incorporating bike racks on buses, has been successful in counties such as
Humboldt, Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, and San Diego. The regional system, CCAT, has installed 6 racks for
service, which started in winter, 1991. These are front racks capable of holding 2 road or mountain bikes.
The service is free and signs showing this service will be placed at all appropriate bus stops. These stops
also will be on the bus schedules for the region. This system allows people to ride their bike to regional
fixed bus stops, place the bike on the bus bike rack, and ride the bus the remainder of the trip. This
service is expected to be beneficial in this area, where distance, hills,.and wind are a major deterrent for
some potential bicycle commuters.
Park and Ride Lots
Th ese lots are being encouraged throughout this region as part of the mitigation strategies to reduce single
occupancy vehicle trips. S_ ome riders would like to bicycle to the lots, leave their bikes, and.meet their ride.
Bike safety is an issue when leaving a bike for the day in an unattended lot with minimal locking
attachments.
Bike lockers have been successful at lots and provide protection from weather and security problems. At
a minimum, bike locking facirties should be included at these lots. For many bicycle commuters, amenities
such as showers, lockers, and rain gear check -outs are beneficial at their work place or final destination.
BIKE FUNDING
Several options are available to fund bicycle projects and include funding sources from the Federai, State,
and Local levels. A synopsis of all the funding sources and how they prioritize between projects is
presented in Figure F -4.
F -16
Federal Funding
Surface Transoortation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987. This Act provides that Caltrans may
annually obligate up to $4.5 million of the apportioned primary and secondary highway funds to California
for bikeways projects. The funds may cover up to 100% of the project if approved. These designated
bikeway funds have not been released for bikeway purposes in the recent past. Bike advocate groups
have successfully guaranteed the release of the total allocation for bikeways projects, that may include
construction, planning and design costs, facilities, shelters, and safety and educational programs. Priority
is being given to commuter oriented projects.
Land and Water Conservation Act of 1965. This is a federal funding source overseen by the State
Department of Parks and Recreation to grant monies to State and local jurisdictions for recreational
bikeways projects. Localities pay for the project costs up front, but are being reimbursed later through
the Act.
Combined .Road Program (CRP). CRP combines the FAU, FAS, and Bridge Replacement funds and is
available to the local jurisdictions for streets, roads, transit, and bikeways purposes. Funds are being
administered by Caltrans with projects selected through a cooperative process involving a local FAU Project
Review and Selection Committee staffed by County Engineering. The 1987 Surface Transportation
Assistance Act modified this program by authorizing California to participate in a demonstration program
that consolidated these programs into a single block grant. The overall goal of this program has been to
provide increased programming flexibility to obligate funding for projects. A statewide committee was
formulated to develop operational policies and the local FAU Committee has been redesignated as the local
CRP Committee.
State Fundind
California Wildlife. Coastal, and Park and Land Conservation Bond Act of 1988. Proposition 70 is a
competitive grant program for local jurisdictions for $5 Mill-ion available statewide over a two year period.
A portion of this Act provides funds for the acquisition, development, or rehabilitation of park, recreation,
bike and pedestrian trails, or historical facilities. Funding is being limited to Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991.
State. Highway Account (SHA).: SHA provides $360,000 per year to be used for Bikeway Capital
Improvement projects. These projects must be associated with a state highway /freeway. This funding had
not been spent in the last two years. Caltrans sets up the priority list from which the California
Transportation Commission (CTC) chooses the bike projects to fund. If the project costs are being
estimated to exceed $250,000, they must be identified in the State Transportation Improvement Projects
(STIP) process. Applications are available from Caltrans for the October deadline. All jurisdictions applying
must have an approved bikeways element that meets the standard criteria for bikeways set by Caltrans.
Local Bicycle Lane Account (BLA). BLA is being administered by Caltrans and provides another $360,000
annually for commuter - oriented projects. This account is being drawn from a portion of the State Gas Tax
revenues. A minimum 10% local funding match is being required from the applicants who may be a county
or a city. Applications are available from Caltrans for the October deadline.
To be eligible for funds, the project must be near or parallel to state, county, or city roadways. The
applicant also must have an approved Bikeways Plan to be eligible for funding under the California
Bikeways Act (Sections 2370- 2392). The legislation makes funding available for new bikeways, commuter
oriented routes, secured parking, bike racks on buses, traffic signalization for cyclists, planning, and
education programs.
F -17
Priority is being given to new bikeways on major corridors and commuter oriented, projects. San Luis
Obispo County has funded Class II bike lanes on Los Osos Valley Road, from Foothill Blvd. to Los Osos
at a total cost of $68,000, with the BLA covering $52,000 of the total cost. The Cayucos bike lane on
Ocean Avenue from 3rd St. to 12th St. had been constructed at a total cost of $9.0,000 with the BLA
covering $81,000 of that total. Most recently, Santa Ysabel St. in Morro Bay had been approved for
Widening and installation of class II bike lanes from South Bay Blvd. to 7th St. This past year, Caltrans
received more than $2.7 million in- application requests, and jurisdictions were awarded $510,120 to fund
seven projects. The amount was a total rolled over from previous years, which exceeded the $360,000
annual total No city or county may receive more than 25% of the total of moneys appropriated to either
accounts in a single fiscal year.
California Coastal Conservancy. Funding is also available for bikeways and accessways along coastal zone
areas. Access can include projects encouraging enhancement of existing access facilities for new user
groups, :(such as handicapped groups), as well as providing facilities for new activities, such as bicycling.
This is a statewide allocation requiring matching funds, which. may be a varied match according to the scale
of the project and the grantees' location. Applicants may be local public agencies including cities, counties,
districts, association of govemmerts, joint powers agencies, and certain nonprofit organizations. All
proposals must meet set requirements stipulated in the application. The source of this funding comes from
bonds, including Proposition 70. Grant applications are being received year round, and there is no specific
deadline. This is a source now being requested to fund a planned Class I bikeway between Avila Beach
Road and San Luis Bay Drive.
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program. This program is the recently passed Proposition 111
known now as AB 471, 1990. Under this law, $10 million is annually being allocated for the next 10 years
for mitigation and enhancement projects relating to State Transportation Improvement Projects (ST1P). The
funds are being drawn from increases in the fuel taxes and weight fees. Any state, local, federal, or
non -profit entity is eligible to apply for grants.
Bikeways are being covered in the measure's Roadside Recreational Projects, which emphasizes projects
serving the greatest need With the greatest benefits, and having the best plan, for maintenance. No single
grant shall exceed $5 million. The project deadline is November 30 o_ f each year. Grants are then being
awarded by the California Transportation Commission in July.
Projects may be directly or indirectly involved with mitigating the impact that a. ST1P project will have on the
surrounding environment. Projects may include racks at trail heads, paths, lane striping, but it does not
include maintenance cost provisions. All proposed bikeways and facilities near ST1P projects having begun
January 1990 and approved for the next ST1P cycle are eligible for these funds.
Clean.Air and Transportation Act of 1990. This Act passed in June, 1990 as Proposition 116 may provide
up to $10 million to this region for class I bike paths.. An additional $20 million in competitive grants for
local agencies to pay for commuter oriented bike projects will be available statewide. All projects will be
reviewed by the Area Council after the application deadline in December, 1992. Recommendations from
the regional transportation planning agency will be forwarded on to the California Transportation
Commission. Funding will be given on a reimbursement basis. This is a one time funding allocation.
Motor Vehicle Registration Fees for Air Quality. AB 2766 provides funding on a competitive basis district
wide. The San Luis Obispo APCD will be monitoring the funds. Till 1993, $2 will be tagged on to
registration fees, which will then be available for commuter alternative transportation modes. In 1994, a total
of $4 will be added to the fee. By 1993, $300,000 would be available for alternative mode projects. Other
counties are using these funds for Bikeways and facilities. The decision to apply these funds to commuter
alternative transportation modes is up to the Board of Supervisors.
F -18
I '
Local Funding
1
J;
Transoortation Development Act. The MA section 99234 designates funding for bikeways projects.
Possible funded facilities will provide for the 11 ... exclusive use of pedestrians and bicycles or for bicycle
safety education programs ..." Furthermore, "money shall be allocated for the construction, including
related engineering expenses, of those facilities pursuant to procedures or criteria established by the
transportation planning agency ... °. Localities have the opportunity to apply 2% of the Local Transportation
Fund (LTF) for bike projects. This 2% may be forgone for these if it is better to be put to use in streets and
roads or transit projects. Current policy for this region specifies that apportions of these funds be on a
population basis to member jurisdictions to use as they see fit for bike projects. Funds may be banked
by the jurisdictions who would like to compound the money to use it for larger bike projects. If a
jurisdiction banks the allocation, it must specify its use in the budget and must not be used for any streets,
highways, and roads expenditures. Approximately, $85,000 is available in fiscal year 1990/91 for bike
projects in this region.
State Gas. Tax. The previous state gas tax of :9 cents yielded $1,578,660for San Luis Obispo's regional
Local Street and Road projects for Fiscal Year 1988/89. The June 1990 proposition increased the tax 5
cents in the first year, with an annual increase of 1 cent for the following 4 years. The state's gas tax will
totaj 18 cents per gallon after 5 years. The Gas Tax has 3 applicable bikeways funding sections: 2104,
2106, and 2107. Section 2106 funding (for cities and counties) apportions a base amount to cities and the
county, with the remaining funds distributed based on land property values and total registered vehicles.
Section 2107 (for cities) distributes money to cities based on its population as a percentage of the state's
total incorporated population. Section 2104 (for counties) allocates a base amount to each county annually
with 75% of these funds distributed based on registered vehicles in each county.
In Fiscal Year 1988/89's Streets and Roads' Financial Transactions Annual Report; the figure given for total
monies spent on bikeway improvements was considerably lower than the actual amount expended. This
is due to improve-merits made and categorized as 11Widening" and "Resurfacing", and not Bikeways
Improvements '. Thus it is difficult to define how much was being spent on just bikeway projects for the .
past years.
General Fund. The General Fund includes funding revenues from the local sales tax, motor vehicle
registration fees, and property taxes among other sources. The General Fund for each city or county can
provide funds for streets and roads and may be tapped for bikeways. This had just. been adjusted to
provide $200,000 annually for bike ways for the city of San Luis Obispo.
Developers' Fees or Exactions. For all new development and redevelopment, developers may be required
to provide fees or facilities for bicycle infrastructure and facilities to accommodate the people that their
project will attract. The stipulated projects must be completed according to either the contract agreement
or as.a condition of project approval. As of yet, San Luis Obispo region does not haven formal policy on
impact fees providing for bikeway improvements and needs when new development occurs.
The Road Improvement Fee is an ordinance approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1989. It has
established mitigation fees for roads, but not bikeways for the various areas within the South County.
These fees could help fund the estimated $20 million for road and bikeway improvements that will be
necessary given the growth in housing and businesses in this region.
Areas within the South County have assigned standard fees. The fee is being determined by how many
trips the development will generate, which is a determined figure from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers. The final fee is being determined by the County Engineering Department. A developer building
a new house in Area 1, which is the Southern part of Nipomo, would pay a fee of $2,420; For
non - residential development, the fee would be $470 per peak hour trip generated by the development,
F -19
Fig. F-4 shows the funding options available for bike projects.
F -20
FIGURE F-4
FUNDING
SYNOPSIS
SOURCE
COMMUTER
RECREATION
EDUCATION/
AMOUNT
ORIENTED
ORIENTED
SAFETY
PROVIDED
Surface Transportation and
x
x
x
100%
Uniform Relocation Act
Land and Water Conservation Act
x
50%
Bikeways Account (SHA)
x
x
90 %,
Local Bike Lane Account (BLA)
x
x
90%
Calif. Coastal Conservancy
x
varies
Proposition 116
x
NA
TDA
x
x
x
% of Total
AB 2766
x
NA
State Gas Tax
x
x
% of Total
General Fund _
x
x
x
varies
Developers' Fees/Exactions
x
x
varies
Local Sales Tax
x
x
x
% of Total
Local Option Gas Tax
x
x
x
% of Total
Tax Increment Financing
x
x
% of Total
Environmental Enhancement &
x
varies
Mitigation Program
Combined Road Program
x
NA
Fig. F-4 shows the funding options available for bike projects.
F -20
Local Sales Tax. Every county has the option of proposing to its electorate a Sales Tax:measure that would
increase the Sales Tax up to 7% for funding transportation projects. Fourteen counties have voted in a
1/2% to 1% sales tax increase on all retail items for up to 20 years to fund transportation and transit
projects, which has included specific allocations for bike projects..
Local Option Gas Tax. The voters have the option, of voting in a one cent incremental increase on their gas
tax, with the revenues stipulated for specific Transportation projects. This User Tax needs a two-thirds
majority vote that has not passed in any election.in Califomia. In addition, the tax is a gallon tax that does
not keep pace with inflation and generates substantially less revenue than a sales tax. It requires, for
instance, an increase of approximately nine cents per gallon initially and up to 20 cents per gallon in 20
years to equal the revenues that could be generated by a 1/2 cent sales tax increase. (Area Council, 1990)
Tax Increment Financing. This is a financing technique used throughout California. This can be used in
areas where infrastructure projects are being needed, but there is no public funding available. Funds
become available through the excess of tax revenues generated by the new development. Projects are
being financed from public funds or bonds, then repaid from the increasing amount of newly generated
taxes. Once the debt is paid, the tax is either reduced or renewed for future specified projects.
Creative Solutions
Solutions to common problems, such as safety, vehicle conflict, and poor road conditions are being
implemented in several counties where bike travel is being recognized as an important source of alternative
transportation. Funding has, however, been a major problem in the advancement of many bike programs.
Santa Cruz County has taken a different approach in how it has apportioned its TDA funds for bike
projects. The typical approach is to take the minimal apportionment of 2% from the top of the TDA
allotments to pay for bike projects. Santa Cruz allots an apportionment to cover the bike projects that are
being stipulated This apportionment is then sent to their Transportation Commission for approval. Typical
funding for bikeways in Santa Cruz is around 4% of TDA funds per year.
Another funding solution has been implemented by Davis. Infrastructure needs are always increasing and
can be a considerable. cost. Davis has consistency depended on developer exactions to implement new
bike facilities for existing and new development. It is an expected exchange that.the developers will provide
the necessary bicycle facilities and infrastructure for development rights.
In the Silicon Valley, large employers have provided bicycle amenities to encourage greater bike use in the
area. These include improved bike trails, cycling information brochures, mileage payments for bike use,
discounts on all employee bicycle purchases at local bike shops. One firm reported an estimated 25% of
their 2,200 employees were riding bikes to work, thus reducing the need for parking by 500 spaces.
Private business contributions or partnerships are another funding source.
Many counties have created a position or committee to oversee the needs of the bike community. Such
a Committee, as used in San Diego and Santa Cruz, is being made up of members from the Area Council,
Caltrans, Supervisorial District representatives, county school districts, the Bicycle industry, county-wide bike
clubs, and citizen groups. Open meetings invite discussion from the public on bike issues. Projects and
policies are being voted on and passed by a majority vote. They also advise Transportation Commissions
and related agencies of bike issues. A coordinator position as in Davis, CA. can be full or part time and can
involve reviewing proposed projects. They also finalize a priority project list that they send to the
Transportation Commissions for final action. In Seattle, Washington, there is a bike patrol, consisting of
28 "cycle cops" who conduct the typical police routines. With the use of mountain bikes and retrofitted
uniforms, cycle cops have made an impact on law enforcement and total amounts of funding needed for
transportation.
F -21 .
The Los Angeles Police Department has also begun such a program. The bikes that are used are from
their pool of stolen bikes usually put up for auction. Thus, the bikes are free for the department. They have
also saved thousands of dollars (up to $30,000 per each patrol car) by reducing car purchases and
maintenance, The advantage is not only reduced expenditures on cars, but also reductions in overall air
pollution emissions.
This has also created a bike awareness within the.government. Police riders could also provide some ideas
and support toward needed bike projects and facilities in the various jurisdictions.
Ventura County resolved the problem of riders on narrow bridges. A bike lane suspended from the side
of the bridge held below by cables adequately allows riders to cross. The ground surface of the lane is
a metal mesh material, which allows debris and glass to fall through to prevent tire damage. This is an
innovative way to address the problem of narrow bridges, which present a dangerous haz_ and to the driver
and rider.
Many larger jurisdictions in the state have enacted a Transportation System Management (TSM) program
that mandates that all employers with over 25 employees must enact a Trip Reduction program for all-work
related trips. It stipulates that the work trips must be. reduced by a given percentage. One way to reach
the reduction is by discouraging SOV travel and encouraging carpooling, ridesharing, walking, and
bicycling. If the reduction rate is not reached, fines can range up to $500 per day. Incentives to help
encourage alternative transportation use include: bonuses, paid vacations accruals, lockers, showers,
bicycle facilities, flexible working hours, employee cycling clubs, bike commuter maps, and loaner bikes.
In Palo Alto many streets are being barricaded to prohibit car traffic. The streets that are being blocked
off are usually parallel to traffic congested arterial streets. This allows bicyclists to travel on the parallel
streets with little interference from heavy car traffic. Street and roads are being blocked by logs, fences,
or landscaping. Also, Palo Alto's City employees are being reimbursed 7 cents per mile for riding their
bikes to work. Their police bept offers a bicycle traffic school for juveniles who have received fees for
bicycle violations.
In Eugene, Oregon, residents switched from cars to bikes in order to preserve their trees. The trees would
have been cut down when streets were being widened to accommodate the increased vehicle volumes.
The alternative chosen developed a comprehensive pedestrian and bikeways program.
There is a nation wide trend to convert unused Railroad tracks into Class I bike paths. This movement is
termed Rails to Trails. There is also a possibility of putting bike and pedestrian paths adjacent to existing
tracks, which is a movement called Rails with Trails. This idea is being pursued by many jurisdictions who
want to lease or purchase the right of way next to the tracks to implement paths for diverting bicyclists from
busy streets.
Besides railroad tracks, jurisdictions have seen the possibility of gaining partial rights of way from utility, oil,
and water line projects. Rights of way for such projects involve usually an acquisition of up to 100 feet.
The actual amount needed for access to the pipeline may only be 20 to 50 feet: Easements or right of
ways may be acquired as part of the projects.
In Denmark, the city's commerce recently purchased 5,000 bikes to be available for residents use within
the downtown and city areas. These bikes would include the business logos of those who contributed and
are distinctive in style for easy identification. The bikes would be unlocked and freestanding in the
downtown area and are only convenient for travel in the town, due to their heaviness and one gear only
capability. This could be an extended as an idea for hotels to offer a bike loan service to guests.
F -22
r.,
Creative Solutions for San Luis Obispo:
Incentives to switch transportation modes will be increasing throughout the. upcoming years. One incentive
to be implemented in the San Luis Obispo region is a Trip Reduction. Ordinance proposed by the Air
Pollution Control District Employers with over a specified number of employees will be required to reduce
work related SOV trips by a certain percentage set by the APCD. Programs to reduce SOV trips include:
carpools, vanpools, ridesharing, transit use, walking, and bicycling. The proposed ordinance would first
apply to those work places with 100 or more employees, then those with 50 to 99 employees, and finally
those with 25 to 49 employees. The number of businesses that will be required to meet these percentages
are presented below in Figure F -5. Through incentives and disincentives employers wip be encouraged
to meet their SOV reduction requirernehL
FIGURE, F -5
Total of Region's Employees to be
Affected by a Trip Reduction Ordinance
1 -992 1993 1994 1995 .
100 or More Employees 33,500
50 to 99 Employees 461900
25 to 49 Employees 81,800 _ 97,000
i
San Luis Obispo City is actively pursuing a bike trail along the existing Southem Pack Railroad tracks to
connect the North and South Counties. The tracks now are being used approximately 4 times per day by
Southem Pacific freight trains and Amtrak passenger trains. Parcels needed for the proposed bike paths
are being reviewed by the city for purchasing. For the most part the width adjacent to the tracks is wide
enough to accommodate an 8 foot bike path. There are some spots Where the Width is narrow and cannot
be widened due to physical constraints. This is also the case when the tracks go through tunnels and over
bridges. Parcels are recommended to be acquired in phases with popular routes, such as Cal Poly routes,
to be constructed first. San Luis Obispo should look at other utility projects where right of ways or
easements are required, such as the state water project. Many public utility lines require a right of way of
50' -100' width across the line, of which only 10' is actually used-. The remainder could be used for
pedestrian/equestrian/bike trails.
An annually updated regional bikeways map and informational brochures are recommended for commuters,
recreationafists, new residents, and tourists. These could be available throughout the county for free or
for a minimal cost. It would be important to have a unified regional definition of Classes I, II, and III, and the
bikeways would be highlighted on the regional map. The map would be annually updated by the Bike
Coordinator.
F -23
r ,^
Bicycle Coordinator positions have proven successful in many jurisdictions and is recommended for this
area. A coordinator could oversee all the issues concerning cyclists. The coordinator could consider
public input on the existing system and investigate suggestions for improvements. Street resurfacing and
road widenings could be reviewed by the Coordinator to ensure that bikeways or 4-5 foot shoulders are
being included continually wherever possible.
Implementation of facilities and trails, identification of funding, road condition updates, and bike counts
could also be responsibilities for this full time coordinator. Besides this coordinator position, one person
would be in charge of dealing with bike issues at the two colleges in the area. This could be a part time
position responsible for providing safe routes to the campuses and on the campuses. The two
Coordinators would work together and with the public to secure safety and efficiency for bike riders.
In 1990, the city of San Luis Obispo conducted a city wide survey covering transportation topics, including
bike issues. This has revealed several insights for successfully encouraging more alternative transportation
modes. The transportation survey revealed that more respondents would ride a bicycle if certain provisions
were present. The following provisions are listed in order of priority.
- More bike lanes
- Separated bike lanes from traffic
- less cars and trucks on roads
- Secure parking spaces
- Smoother roads
- Closer proximity to work place
- Other incentives
- Showers at work
- _Riding companions
- Flexible work schedule
Implementation of these provisions could help encourage bike riders to increase their use of bicycles for
primary purpose trips in the future, and get new bicyclists on the toad.
A county wide transportation survey is being recommended to identify the regional problems and needs
that exist Such a survey would also reveal commuting patterns, which can be used to form a
Transportation System Management (TSM) program for the region. A TSM program helps to encourage
more efficient use of .transportation systems, such as carpools, transit, bicycles, and walking. Larger
employers and educationalfacilities, such as the Government centers, Cal Poly, Cuesta College, and Pacific,
Gas, and Electric should also be surveyed biennially to more efficiently monitor and implement TSM
programs.
This can be conducted in conjunction with the Regional Ridesharing Outreach Program. PG &E's
commuting patterns were surveyed in 1990. The resulting information has allowed the Ridesharing
Coordinator to implement more efficient commuting patterns for employees. This program may also result
in reductions of overall automobile. emissions, wear and tear on the employees' cars, and costs to the
employer as a result of fewer parking spaces to construct and maintain.
A similar survey should be coordinated with the individual grade schools to identify the routes and
transportation modes used by faculty, staff, and children. It is necessary to provide safe bicycle and
pedestrian routes for children. Most of the grade schools, when surveyed over the phone, revealed that
most students are dropped off at school by their parents.
F -24
In the high schools, many students drive to school. Bicycling should be a transportation mode emphasized
at the grade schools and safe routes and facilities should aide those on bikes.
Establishing Bike Pools at busy office centers can also alleviate the need for employees and employers to
get into their cars for short errands and meetings throughout the work day. The San Luis Obispo Police
Dept. purchased 3 mountain bikes for this purpose. It provides freedom and flexibility not found with.transit
for short range trips. Bike helmets are an important itern, especially for traveling on regional. routes with
heavy vehicle congestion and high traveling speeds. Employers should be encouraged to provide helmets
for all employees riding to work to reduce the initial expense of riding and reduce the possibility of severe
head injury.
San Luis Obispo City's Fire. Dept. has purchased 3 fully equipped mountain bikes for daily business
purposes. These are most used by the fire inspectors who make several short range trips (5 mile radius
of City Halo daily. This mode of travel was perceived as more time and energy efficient for making
inspection calls. The bikes cost $500 each, which includes a helmet; riding gear, and attachments such
as clip on .soft briefcases. This bike pool idea could be extended to all business centers that have
employees conducting daily short range business trips or personal errands..
Another unique opportunity is the provision of bicycles for inter city travel for their hotel guests. The Inn
at Morro Bay has had great success with their bike program. Sit One speed bike cruisers can be used
by guests for use in the park and the town.'The bikes are easily identified as the Inn's property by their
design and red color; Bikes are available for use from 7 A.M. to dark. They cost the Inn roughly $150 a
piece. The bikes are covered under their property insurance. The bikes can save unnecessary car travel
Within town. Short trips can be made by these bikes and can provide the guest with a fun way to see the
area
Other transportation vehicles for hotels or businesses to promote are the surreys, a four wheel bicycle with
seating for four people, that provide fun and non polluting transportation for residents and guests in the
town. Morro Bay has such a business at the Embarcadero.
This has proven to be a prosperous activity because of the following reasons:
- a proprietor can rent them by the hour,
- they are safe to use;
- they have a low security risk due to their visibility and size;
- they are big enough to carry packages;
- they are avisble and moving advertisement for the business;
- more than one person can use them.
It is recommended that hotels and tourist associations require or encourage alternative transportation for
their guests, to reduce short trips into the downtown or recreational areas.
Local vs. Regional Goals and Policies
Regional bike elements reflect the goals, policies; and improvements that will aid regional bike commuters.
Goals, Policies, and proposed projects thus reflect the bike improvements needed in both city, county, and
regional areas. It is important that city, county, and regional plans be consistent with each other to ensure
safe and efficient travel for such commuters. Most of the present city, county, and regional bicycle
elements cite goals that are unified. Differences were found in how each jurisdiction addressed
classifications of bikeways, which should be rectified with a regional adoption of Class standards. The
Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration's definitions are recommended for the set standard.
F -25
Subjects addressed by the elements were bicycle safety, bike facilities, and encouragement of bike travel
as a viable alternative transportation mode. Most city plans identify priority projects as those routes with
the heaviest vehicle commuter traffic numbers. These routes are usually regional routes and are identified
in the regional project list as well The city and regional bicycle elements are generally unified in direction
and content, and areas for improvemem Local jurisdictions may include more detail about proposed
bikeways on City streets which do not have regional significance and are thus not included in the RTP.
The County Bikeways Element has been dropped from the Transportation Plan. Since 1978, policies
concerning bikeways have been discussed throughout the Land Use Plans. The objective of the element
was to serve as a guide to governmental agencies and private developers. It has outlined similar goals and
issues concerning bikeways within and between this region's areas. The county does differ in their
placement of bikeways on arterials and highways. In the plan, it is recommended that a bike path be
separated from the highway by at least 5 feet. It further states that if paths are closer than 5 feet, physical
barriers such as dense shrubs or chain rink fences or concrete barriers are recommended to divide cars
from bikes. This recommendation is conflicting with the bikeways that are currently being developed by
County Engineering. Those being developed are usualy, Class Il in design. Class II is considered a safe
and acceptable bikeway and should be reflected in the county land use plans or the Engineering Dept.
should consider Class I where the plan recommends its implementation. The County and Regional plans
do have similar route designations and intentions to provide safe and efficient bikeways and facilities for
the commuter and recreation bicyclist.
Bike Projects
A review of the 1988 RTP showed how many projects have been completed. The road inventory presented
inAppendbc AA -1, also expanded on the present condition of those completed projects. The projects still
uncompleted were reviewed along with several other new proposed projects by the Area Council, local
jurisdictions, and the region's bike clubs. A new project list has been developed with commuter projects
being prioritized.
Following the project list is a series of maps representing the incorporated and unincorporated areas of
San Luis Obispo region. The maps show where streets and roads need to be widened to include
shoulders and bikeways to increase the bicyclists' safety on these routes. Proposed routes for the 1990
RTP are also delineated on the maps.
Priorities are established in the following manner:
1 st prio ft Routes and projects must be established commuter routes in rural areas that will jointly serve
school children. A high priority should be given to projects that are designed to improve the safety of
existing facilities.
2nd priority. Bikeways providing short trip routes to busy activity centers.
3rd priority. Bikeways to be constructed and used as long distance bicycle routes.
Proposed Commuter Oriented Proiects
These priorities should be applied when many bike projects are applying for limited grant monies.
Generally, all projects proposed are expected to provide safer and more efficient. travel for cyclists once
the project or servcie is completed. The follwoing list of projects was a result of -input from the perspective
jurisdictions, bike clubs, and advocates, and surveys. Priorities have not been applied to this fist; but the
above standard criteria may be applied by the local, county, or regional entity.
F-'26
I
* Cuesta Grade, from San Luis Obispo to Santa Margarita;
O'Connor Way, from Foothill Blvd. to Cuesta College;
• James Way, from Taly, Ho to Hwy 101, stencil and sign;
• Valley Rd. from Hwy 1 to Fair Oaks, improve lanes for high school and daily commuters;
• South Bay Blvd, from Quintana Rd. to Santa Ysabel Rd.;
• South Higuera, install continuous bike Lanes from Marsh to High St.
• Corbett Canyon Rd., from its northern to southern terminus;
• Hwy 1, from CienegaSt. through Oceano;
• Los Berros Rd., from Valley Rd. to Pomeroy Rd.;
• Pomeroy Rd., from Los Berros Rd. to West Tefft St.;
* Grand Ave, between North Rena and Hwy 1, ff widening occurs;
• Higuera St., from Santa Rosa to Nipomo St., remove on street parking on at least one side of the street
in the downtown area, which is also designated in the San Luis Obispo Circulation
Element;
• Tank Farm Rd., from South Higuera St. to Broad St. create 'a safe bike lane;
• 13Th St. Bridge in Paso Robles;
• Orchard St. in Nipomo from W. Tefft to Santa Maria;
• Mentone to Ash Streets to be used as the preferred alternative route to Grand Ave. Post signs on Grand
Ave. to detour cyclists to Menton - Ash;
• Any bikeway with a 1 by its side (in the Existing Bikeways Map) is recommended for widening to
accommodate a 45 foot bikeway asr long as it is deemed feasible according to terrain constraints;
• Take on- street parking off the Northern side of Marsh St. and replace it with a. bike lane;
• Install a suspended bikeway from the Niblick Bridge to allow bicyclists to make a safe east/west crossing
in. Paso Robles;
• Bike path for Morro Bay, from San Jacinto across Hwy 1 over the Morro Bay High School;
• Two paths around. Cerro San Luis Mountain, one going from Madonna Rd. connecting with O'Connor
Rd., and second a path from Los Osos Valley Rd: connecting with O'Connor Rd. through Laguna Lake
Park;
* Rails with Trails, South County to North County through San Luis Obispo with bike paths placed adjacent
to train tracks;
* Salinas River, from Santa Margarita to San Miguel.
F -27
Establishing necessary facilities to provide security and convenience for the commuter cyclist;
* Existing and future Park and Ride Lots include bicycle racks and lockers;
* Enclosed lockers for bicmcles to be placed at major business centers and iruermod_ ai stations or points,
hike bus stops and park and ride lots;
Recreational O riented. Proiects
• Lopez Dr., from Lopez Lake to Pearwood Lane;
• Orcutt Rd., from Broad St to Lopez Drive.
• Bike path into Montana D'Oro State Park to a proposed trail head off Pecho Rd., past Costa Azul Dr.,
• Avila Beach trail, from San Luis Bay Dr. over Bay Estates to the coast.
F -28
F -35
F -36
a
a
N
Q
Y
m
Z
m
O
U
F
O
N
F
Z
W
W
J
W
N
Q
Y
m
0
m
W
CL
H
�i
m
m
L
c
N
U
m
O
CL
a
m
3
m
_Y
m
CL
O
10
to
m
L_3
b
L
m
m
m
C
m
O
m
L
N
C13
L
m
L
H
Pine Street is in good condition and has designated bike lanes and signs. This stretch of road is very
narrow for truck traffic, which presently exists. Sand spills over into a portion of the bike lane from some
of the corner lots. This problem could be mitigated in the future with the addition of curbs.
Ramona Avenue. has narrow lanes and no shoulders. After Broderson Ave. going east, the road widens
considerably and could be striped to provide shoulder for bicycles. This.is located in a residential area and
is adjacent to the Audobahn Society's bird sanctuary. Most of Los Osos has no sidewalks. Along this
stretch, a dirt path used for walking and possibly riding could be put in.
7th Street goes through a residential area and does -not have sidewalks or striping in the center or on the
sides of the road. The road is encroached by sand from the residential lots. It is not heavily traveled by
vehicles.
Santa Ysabel Avenue does not have sidewalks or shoulder striping. The traffic is heavy and is is not
recommended for cyclists. An alternative parallel route is recommended, such as Santa Maria or El Morro
Avenues. There is room on the roadside for shoulder.
Los -Osos Valley Road is somewhat congested near the Williams Brothers shopping area The road
includes on- street parking, but no striping. Stripping and signage is provided around Broderson Ave. going
towards Montana De Oro.
Los Osos Valley Road now has shoulders along a majority of its length since the bridge has been widened
near Buckskin Dr. It is wide and has shoulders along the rural stretch through the farm lands. There are
no bikeways between Madonna and Los Osos Valley Rd.
San Luis Obispo
Foothill-Boulevard is a high speed, high volume road traveled by commuters and Cuesta students at all
hours. There are marked bike routes on this stretch from Los Osos Valley Rd. to Cal Poly which are heavily
used. The designated bike route is interrupted with parking and trailers that are parked displaying "For
Sale, signs. The bike route does not exist from Los Cerros to Tassajara.
O'Connor Road is a regularly used as a back route to Cuesta College and Camp San Luis Obispo. If is
rarely patrolled by the Sheriff and thus vehicles find this to be a high speed alternative to Highway 1. Bike
riders use this route frequently for commuting to Cuesta. There are no shoulders and the striping is at a
treacherous edge of the roadside. There is room along side the road for widening. There are 4 blind
curves near the entrance into the old campus area
California Boulevard is a popular route for bicyclists and drivers commuting to Cal Poy and is a parallel
route used to avoid the busy Santa Rosa St. Those using the bike lanes and on- street parking are
constantly in conflict with each other. Parking conflicts occur frequently with vehicles leaving or entering
parking spaces. The drivers stop in the bike lane to wart for vehicles to leave, which can pose great danger
to cyclists. It is recommended that an alternative path be provided for bikes, possibly a tra next to the
railroad, or that on- street parking be eliminated in the area north of Hathaway.
Madonna Road is a heavily congested roadway carrying commuters from the Laguna Lake access to San
Luis Obispo and shoppers between Madonna Plaza and downtown. There are 4 to 5 foot shoulders
designated as bike routes. They are continuous until Oceanaire Drive, where the bike route is detoured
through a network of neighborhood streets. At Oceanaire the road, splits into a frontage road blocked by
bushes from Madonna Road. Bicyclists are in the vehicle lane when continuing along on Madonna Rd. at
this point.
AA -s
Atascadero Street is the frontage road to Madonna Rd. It is blocked at the West end at Galleon Way,
before the Laguna Lake Shopping Center by a curb block. It is recommended that a curb cut be provided
for riders going to the shopping center.
Hiquera Street is traveled mostly by shoppers, commuters, and tourists in vehicles and on,bigjcles. In the
downtown area, it is a one way street narrowed considerably by the presence of on- street parking, which
has been the source of conflict for riders and drivers.
There have been many incidences of "clippings" where cyclists have not been seen by those opening car
doors out into the lane and subsequently have run into the open door or have been thrown from their
bicycles. Parallel parking exists on both sides with narrow lanes in between. Traffic is somewhat slow in
this area due to the presence of pedestrians.
Going south on Higuera, there are striped bikeways for cyclists outside the occasional on- street parking
stretches. The bike lane is not present between Marsh and High Streets. There is a conflict between
riders and vehicles at the intersection of Madonna Road and Higuera Street because the right turn lane
veers off to yield into west bound traffic on Madonna Rd..
Riders must carefully appraise the situation if they are planning to continue south on Higuera and switch
two lanes to the left. After Madonna Rd. the bike routes continue down to the Ontario frontage road: There
are some interruptions in the smooth surface making the bicyclist swerve into the vehicle lane.
Tank. Farm Road is an important connector route between South Higuera and Broad Streets. There is
heavy congestion with vehicles traveling at high speeds. There are no shoulders, but there is room for
widening on the road sides. This road is the only connection to Broad Street on the east side of town
between South St. and Buckley Rd.
Santa. Rosa Street leads to and from Hwy 1 and ends at the Railroad Station. Near the highway, safe,
striped shoulders are provided. These are not provided between Murray and Walnut Streets, but begin
after Walnut and continue into the downtown area. The striped shoulders stop in the residential area,
where there is low traffic levels and slower speeds.
Broad Street is a north/south route which traverses San Luis Obispo and leads into the South County.
Broad SL becomes Hwy 227 south of San Luis Obispo. The road is wide and has on- street parking and
striped bike lanes after South St. Ground drainage grates in the lanes are covered with bars perpendicular
to traffic. This route is heavily traveled by vehicles and cyclists with the heaviest volumes during commuter
hours. Closer to town, a congestion occurs between Monterey St. and Church St. In this area, there exists
on- street parking, but no striped bike lane. Where Broad Street crosses the downtown area there is a
danger of car doors opening, cars turning into parking lots, traffic crossing, buses, and stop and go
traffic.
Johnson Avenue is a north/south route that crosses town and connects with popular commuter routes to
the South County. Johnson passes residential areas and two hospital zones. It is heavily travelled by
vehicles and cyclists.
Marsh Street is a one -way downtown route that leads east. Traffic signals are timed for continuous
movement. This is a secondary street in the downtown area with less congestion and interruptions from
cross walks. There `'s on- street parking on both sides of the street There are no bike lanes so cyclists
and vehicles are in constant conflict due to congestion. An especially dangerous segamerd is between
Chorro and Morro where there are sudden stops to the post office. This has caused constant problems
with regard to parking.
AA -6
All roads shown here in black thick line are the adopted bikeways projects in the 1990 RTR.
CL
x
x
0
m
L
N
U
m
O
G
N
a
m
3
CD
s
'a
c
m
a
0
a
m
CD
L_.
m
CO
m
Y
U
L_
s
U
m
a
c
m
m
L
C
3
O
L
N
N
a
m
0
E
AA -18
U)
O
N
wi
UL
AA -19
---------------
. .. .. ......
O
O
N
wi
UL
AA -19
---------------
. .. .. ......
O
V, 7rS
4.
Co
0
i b b
ID,
10
�\
0
cr
>0
o
z
(D@E)E)
LU
a
LU
-j
0
rc
0
0
CL
z
W
2
ul
-j
LLI
Mn
O
BIKEWAYS FINANCIAL BREAKDOWN
Bikeways
Estimated Cost
Comments
Source
Construction
4' wide bikeway costs $3 - $5
Cost does not include acquiring
Air Mitigation
per linear foot
Right of way
Strategies.
$15,840 - $26,400 per mile
Maintenance
Sweeping
$13 for an 8' wide lane mile
sweeping done 2x per week
SLO City
on major bike routes
Engineering
Grinding
$2 per sq. yd.
To smooth 3' width of pavement
SLO City
53520 per mile
between the gutter and bike lane
Engineering
Facilities
Bike and Ride
Racks
5130 a piece
$136.75 total for each rack
Richard'Randis
Mounts
$1 each x 2 needed = $2
SLO TRANSIT
Labor
$4.75 for 15 min. installation
Bike Lockers
$297.00 per locker
1 door, t bike, 45" tall,
Bike Lockers
24" wide. 74" in length.
W. Sacramentc
Delivery
5485
Delivery of greater than 250 mi..
for more than 10 lockers.
Signage
$100 per sign
Sign costs include labor
SLO City
(R81 and G93)
Engineering
Pavement Symbols
$25 - $50 a piece
The closer the bike symbols are
to each other, the lower the cost.
Depends on contract price
Striping
5 - 6 cents per linear ft
Depends on contract 'price
S264: $316.80 per mi.
Removal of metered
$2 x 25 = $50 per day
Avg. 25 meters per.block
Keith Opalewsl,
on street parking
Avg. Revenue for each
Parking
meter /day = $2
Bicycle Education
Bicycle Coordinator
$35,000 per year
Costs include full time position
County Salary
with salary and office expenses
+ Expenses
Bikeways Map 5200 for Typesetting Costs include 2 sided, 2 color
$968.for printing 2000 Maps 11" x 30" fold out Bike Route Map
BB -1
Santa Cruz
Trans.Comm.
There are 28.40 miles of commuter bikeways proposed in the regional 'Bike Projects-
section of the Element The Cuesta Grade and Paso Robles 13th St. Bridge
projects were not included due to the special costs involved with their implementation.
The above figures were applied to those 28.40 miles to get an VPM)dmatation of
what costs are involved. Costs are ranged from a low end to a high end.
For 1 mi. of
Construction
Grinding
Symbols: 2 per mi.
Striping
Maintenance
For 28.40 mi. of
Construction
Grinding
Symbols: 2 per mi.
57 symbols
Striping:
at S.05 S S.06 per mi.
of Low End
$15,840
$3520
2 x $25.= $50
$.OS x 5280 ft= $264
S
1 x per week:
$13 x 52 weeks = $676.
5676 per year
28.40 x $15,840. = $44.9,856.
28.40 x $3520. = $99,968.
$25. x 2 = S50.
57 x $50 = $2850.
$264..2 28.40 = $7497.60
-alcalation of High End
$26,4o0.
$3,520.
2 is $50 = $ 100
$.06x 5280 = $316.80
530,336.50
2. x per week:
S13 x 104 times = S1.352
S1,352 per year
28,40 x 526,400. = $749;760.
28,40 x$3520 = S99,968.
S50 x 2 = S 100
57x S100 = S5700
$31.6.80 x 28.40 = $8997 12
TOTAL
5560,171 5867,425.12
Maintenance -
Sweeping 513 x 1 er
P wk = S13 $13 x 2 per K4c = $26 per wk
$13 x 28.40 = $369.20 S26 x 28.40 = S738.40 per wk
$369.20 x 52 weeks = S19,198.40 5738.40 x 52 weeks = $38,396.80
TOTAL $19,198.40 per year
533 396.80 per year
BB -7_
i 1y� �,
� � � ��
r,�` ���i
h�u'� ��
G'I ��� � _
�.� i J
�t,�^ �� �
� ��
I;
V
7054
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF BICYCLE LANE ACCOUNT
GRANT APPLICATIONS TO CALTRANS
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo ( "City ") has identified projects eligible for
funding through the State's Bike Lane Account administered by Caltrans; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted the State - approved Bikeways Element of the San
Luis Obispo County 1990 Regional Transportation Plan in order to be eligible for funds
administered by Caltrans;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
hereby authorizes the submittal of Bike Lane Account gran t applications to Caltrans for the
following projects:
1) A design study for constructing a bike path along the railroad right -of -way
between Orcutt Road and Cal Poly Campus with a projected cost of $125,000
and;
2) Establishing Class II bike lanes along Santa Rosa Street (State Highway 1)
between Murray and Walnut Streets with projected cost of $180,000.
On motion of Councilwoman Pinard ,seconded by Councilwoman
Rappa , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 19thday of November , 1991.
ATTEST:
- IL U14�
C Clerk Ja n Voges
R -7054
I
I
Page 2: Resolution 7054(1991 Series)
APPROVED:
Uty Adlinfistrative Officer
Finance Director
Community Dekgpment Director
I ev
RESOLUTION NO. 7053 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION
TO DENY A REQUEST TO CULVERT THE REMAINDER OF THE OPEN
DRAINAGE CHANNEL ACROSS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3249 BROAD STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
i
i
consideration of public testimony, the applicant's request, the
Planning Commission's action, the appeal to the!City Council, and
staff recommendations and reports thereon, denies the appeal of the
Planning Commission's action to deny the request to culvert the
remainder of the open drainage channel, as shown on plans approved
with Use Permit # 1475, based on the followinglfindings:
1. The easement requirement called for in Condition # 6 of
approved Use Permit # 1475 is a typical condition of
discretionary use permits and consistent with Resolution
# 5138 that implemented the city's flood management policy
which states that "the city shall actively seek to obtain
easements and /or ownership for creek access, maintenance
and construction whenever possible and appropriate".
2. The city's creek dedication policy stipulates that the
property owner shall "dedicate the natural creek area
within his property" as a condition of approval of projects
requiring planning entitlements other than a building
permit or a lot line adjustment.' The property owner's
changes to the site including paving, fencing, landscaping
and modifications to the drainage channel to establish the
automobile sales lot required .both a Planning Commission
use permit and architectural review. These changes
constitute substantial improvements to the site which would
require easement dedication as a condition of development
approval.
R -7053
i
n
3. Approving the request to culvert the 'remainder of the
drainage channel would be a grant of special privilege and
set a precedent inconsistent with current city policy.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approved'Use Permit # 1475
is valid subject to all the original conditions contained in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 5014 -90. In addition, the
easement shall be executed and a building permit obtained to
complete other required improvements, consistent with previous
approvals,. within thirty (30) days or the use permit will be
scheduled for a Planning Commission revocation hearing.
On motion of Councilman Roalman
seconded by. Councilwoman Rappa , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Roalman
NOES: Councilmember Reiss and Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted :this
of November , .1991.
f
Mayor RON DUNIN
19 th day
APPROVED:
ity A inistrative Officer
Community Develoyment Director
1
4q�9 �l
Nqt
RESOLUTION NO.. 7052 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO DESIGNATING THE CALIFORNIA
SYCAMORE AS THE OFFICIAL TREE OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Tree Committee feels that the
California Sycamore Tree has played a significant role in San
Luis Obispo's history; and
WHEREAS, the California Sycamore Tree is a proven survivor
in the area and is currently used almost exclusively at all
bridge crossings within the city due to its ability to thrive
under varying conditions.
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Tree Committee has requested.
that the City of San Luis Obispo designate the California
Sycamore Tree as the official tree of the City of San Luis
Obispo; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo designates the California Sycamore as the
official tree of the City of San Luis Obispo.,
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilwoman Pinard and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss,'Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of November
1991.
.e - a
mayor Ron Dunin
ATTE T• J
v�
i
Pame a Voges, Cit rk
treeres/dtrl33
R -7052
n n��
�1'
I
RESOLUTION NO. 7051 (1991 Seri les)
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF BOYSEN AVENUE
NEAR NORTH.SANTA ROSA STREET.]
I
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City;of San Luis Obispo
As follows:
SECTION 1. It is the intention of the City of Sari Luis Obispo
to abandon a portion of Boy"sen Avenue near- its intersection with
North Santa Rosa Street (State Highway 1), as shown on the map
marked Exhibit ".B ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by such
reference, pursuant to Section 8300 et. seq. of the Streets and
Highways Code, and that the abandonment shall) be subject to the
following finding and conditions:
Finding
1. The public right -of -way to be abandonedl is not needed for
present or future street purposes.
Conditions
I
I
1. The final street abandonment shall be recorded concurrently
with the record of survey and certificate of compliance for
Lot Line Adjustment LLA 91 -139.
2. Applicant shall offer for dedication to the City and show on
the record of survey or final map an easement for utilities
within the right -of -way to be abandoned, to the approval of
the utility companies and the City Engineer.
SECTION 2. Copies of the map showing the particulars of the
proposed abandonments are also on file in the office of the City
Clerk, at 990 Palm Street.
SECTION 3. Tuesday, December 10, 1991, iri the Council Chamber
of the City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San-'Luis Obispo, California is
the time and place set for hearing all persons interested in or
objecting to the'proposed abandonment, which time is not less than
R -70.51
Council Resolution. No. 7051 (1991 Series)
Page 2
fifteen (15) days from the passage of this resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolution, together -with the ayes and noes,
shall be published once in full at least ten (10) days before the
public hearing on the proposed street abandonments, in the
Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this
city.
SECTION S. The City Engineer shall post, at least three (3)
notices of the proposed abandonments in prominent locations near
the portion of the street to be abandoned at least fourteen (14)
days before the date set for the hearing in accordance with Section
8322 of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 6. The City Engineer shall notify utility companies
affected by the proposed abandonments within ten (10) days after
adoption of the Resolution of Intention in accordance with Section
8347 of the Streets and Highways Code.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa seconded by
Councilwoman Pinard , and on the following
roll call vote;
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
I
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 19th
day of November , 1991.
R -7051
Council Resolution No.
Page-3
7051 (1991 Series)
ATTEST:
Pam
APPROVED:
Attachment: Exhibit A, Street Abandonment Map
vt\
404 OEM' oil
��t1•li� /talilat %tst�lLIMITS
tit s
srararalatalautwr/tatats
C /OS 1p
@O •�+ s'9S�'9
�y
L
%\� lYN
O MI
NINN
••YNI �p
IN
bes h, •. \ w C wll. Aledy •whir.. i
f-".q!
fsA
_ BLVC3
o
N —$•
� A 'ew
• � i O !O ��4 rill � «I bi
i w.rrr .ir••
1
' moll�
I.
I
� r
I
al �.
i I •� ,r
i— .y
/ _ I
i 1 `,
'i , .!,^ 1 N i' ♦ carry III
I
AiY T I 1
1 � ,no►rd�' �.
f
PORTION OF BOYSEN STREET RIGU -OF -WAY TO BE ABAMIAED,
USE PERNUT U1529 - Request to allow new restaurant and
• office building at 179 No. Santa Rosa
Street (State Highway 1)
' EXHIBIT
C5 -7
(
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
No.- Q�iJ�O�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Luis Obispo
oJJJJJJ�
ss.
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not
interested in the above -entitled r(la i
I am now, and at all times embraced
in the publication herein mention was, the principal clerk
of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published daily, Sundays ex-
cepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above
named county and state; that N VII C,/
at which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy, was
published in the above -named newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof — on the following dates, to -wit:
that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained
and established a newspaper of general circulation by
Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo
County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139
under,the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the
Government Code of the State of California.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Date 1131 , 19 9 1—
i.:�� �
`
�. RESOLUTION NO.7051
(1991 Series)
A' RESOLUTION OF
INTENTION TO ABANDON
APORTION OF
BOYSEN AVENUE NEAR
NORTH SANTA ROSA
STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the j
Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. It is the iriten-
tion of the City of San Luis
Obispo to abandon a portion
of Boysen Avenue near its
intersection with North Santa
Rosa Street (State Highway
1), as shown on the map
marked Exhibit "B", attached
. hereto and incorporated here-
in by, such reference, pur-
suant to Sectioh 8300 et seq.
of the Streets and Highways
Code, and that the abandon- _
ment shall be subject to the
following finding and condi-
tions:
Finding
1. The public right -of -way
to be abandoned is not need- I
ed for present or future street i
purposes. j
Conditions
. 1. The final.street abandon-
ment shall be recorded can•'
currently with the record of i
survey and certificate of com-
pliance for Lot Line Adjust-
ment .LLA.91 -139.
2. Applicant shall offer for
dedication to the City and
show on the record of survey
or final map an easement for
utilities within the rigfit -of -way
to be abandonded, to the
approval of the utility comps -
,hies and the City Engineer:
SECTION 2. Copies of the i
map showing the particulars '
of the .proposed abandon-
ments are also on file in the f
office of the City Clerk, at 990
Palm Street.
SECTION 3.. Tuesday, De-
camber 10, 1991,in the Coun-
cil Chamber of the City Hall,
990 Palm Street, 'San Luis
Obispo, California is the time
and .place set for hearing all
persons .interested in or ob-
jecting to the proposed aban-
doment,which time. is not
less than fifteen (15) :days
from the passage of this
' resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolu-
tion, together with the .ayes
and noes, shell be published
once in full at least ten (10)
days before the public hear-
!. ing on the proposed street-,
abandonments, in the Tale -'
gram- Tribune, a newspaper I
published and, circulated in
this city.
SECTION 5. The City Engi -'
near shall post at least three
(3) notices of the proposed j
abandonments in prominent
locations near the portion. of I
the street to be abandoned at
' least fourteen _(14)' days be-
-fore the data ..set for the
hearing in accordance with
Section 8322 of the Streets
li and Highways Code.. .
SECTION 6. The City Engi-.'
near shall notify utility compa-i
` nies affected by the proposed'
abandonments within ten (10)(
i days after adoption of the
j Resolution of Intention ini
accordance with Section 8347 i
of the Streets and Highways,,
Code.
j On-motion of Councilwom-
an Rappa, seconded by Coun-
cilwomen Pinard,. and on the
jfollowing roll call vote:
AYES: Couneilmembers Pi-
nard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman
and Mayor Dunin:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was'{
passed and adopted this 19th
day of November, 1991.
/s /Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
/s/Pam Voges, City Clerk,
d
ro
C
Q
m
X
n
m
X
M
CD
a.
CCD
21
a.
a
O
c
c
0
rt
O
3
5
m
0
m
a
m
S.
a
0
a
A
C
z
N
a
z
r-
0
N
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7050 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING
THE FINAL TRACT MAP FOR VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 1827 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER
OF FLORENCE AVENUE AND BUSHNELL STREETS (2175 FLORENCE AVENUE)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the subdivider's request, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, found that the a one -year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
1827 is granted a one -year time extension to November 21, 1992,
subject to the original findings and conditions, as specified in
City Council Resolution No. 6723.
On motion of Councilman Roalman_
seconded by Councilman Reiss , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Piayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -7050
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 19th day
of NovPmhar 1991.
Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
City Clerk Pam Voges
APPROVED:
w_
inistrative Officer
OW/ //Uo A
//fAtjo-ryey
Community DevelWment Director
� Y
1
0
r
I
RESOLUTION NO. 7049 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DECLARING PROPERTY LISTED IN EXHIBIT A
AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby declares that all items of property
listed in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by reference are surplus property.
SECTION 2. Disposal of the property shall be made as determined by sale at public
auction or by another method of disposal in accordance with the City's surplus property policy as
determined by the Director of Finance to be in the best interest of the City.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,seconded by Councilwoman Pinard
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted the 19thday of November ,1991.
ATTEST:
I), � ( 14,9)
Pam oges, City Cl
APPROVED:
R -7049
r
1
EXHIBIT A
SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST.- VEHICLES
7817
1978
General Dodge 3/4 Ton 4X4 P/U
4025
1,600
8203
1982
General Plymouth Reliant
4289
1,000
8402
1984
General Ford Tempo
7650
1,100
8403
1984
General Dodge Aries S/W
9915
1,300
8405
1984
General Ford LTD
2228
1,700
8420
1984
General Chevrolet Celebrity
8 707
1;700
8423
1984
General Pontiac Phoenix
9420
1;100
8521
1985
General Ford Tempo
1170
1,400
8524
1985
Fire Oldsmobile Cierra
1378
1;500
8723
1987
Police Buick'LeSabre
3972
3,500
8724
1987
Police Ford Taurus
8226
31000
•11
C
RESOLUTION NO. 7048 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE WATER.TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE (ER 34 -90)
The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo resolves as follows:
Findings
1. The City has published and made available for public review
a Draft Environmental Impact Report. (EIR) for the proposed
upgrade of its water treatment plant; in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality.Act and the City's
Environmental Impact Procedures and Guidelines.
2. On November 5, 1991, the City Council conducted a public
hearing on the EIR.
3. Increased energy consumption will be .a significant,
unavoidable, adverse impact, despite proposed mitigation..
4. The Council intends to approve the project and finds that
there is an overriding consideration: the increased energy
consumption is necessary for the ozonation treatment process
that.s required to meet existing and anticipated water
quality standards.
Action
.1. The Council certifies that the EIR is adequate, provided
that it includes the comments, responses, and additional
information concerning mitigation and monitoring fully
contained in the attached Exhibit A: A Final EIR
incorporating Exhibit A is to be published within 60 days,
and will be made available to any responsible agency.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman Reiss ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmembers Pinard and Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 5th -_
day of November , 1991.
goo*�
r ayor Ron D u n i n
ATTE T:
City Clerk Pam oges
R -7048
Resolution No. (1991 Series)
Water treatment EIR
Page 2
APPROVED:
City Ad inistrative Officer
gmD: eir- res.wp
5 �
Exhibit A
STENNER CANYON WATER TREATMENT PLANT EIR
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
Following are summaries of comments received, and responses. Numbers key to
topics in the following correspondence.
San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District (APCD)
1. More information and an APCD permit will be required for a diesel - powered
peaking generator.
Response: Use of an on -site diesel - powered generator to replace utility-
provided electricity could reduce the City's electricity bills, but not
energy consumption. It is not recommended mitigation, though
the city may decide to pursue it. If the City pursues this option,
additional environmental review will occur and APCD permitting
procedures will be followed.
A diesel generator will be provided for emergency power only. It
will be able to supply chemical feed systems (other than ozone
generation), but not full plant operation. Except for tests to
assure its readiness, it would be run only when utility power fails.
2. Air pollution from construction equipment, particularly grading, should be
addressed through conditions on building permits for this project.
Response: There will be no expansion or recontouring of the site, which was
graded for the original treatment plant construction. However, there will be
excavation and minor fill for building foundations:
Ozone generator building - cut 700 cubic yards, fill 30 cubic yards;
Ozone contact basins cut 950 cubic yards, fill 70 cubic yards.
Construction equipment likely to be used includes skip loaders, dump trucks,
back hoes, concrete -mix trucks and concrete pumpers, and compressors for
various pneumatic equipment. When the duration of use of this equipment is
known, that information will be provided to the APCD for any required review
prior to construction.
3. If population growth enabled by the increase in treatment capacity exceeds the
projections in the Clean Air Plan, air quality impacts of additional induced
growth should be evaluated.
Water Treatment EIR Response to Comments 2
Response: The adopted general plan's build -out capacity is about 53,000
people. The nine percent additional capacity enabled by the
treatment plant expansion would lead to a total service capacity of
about 57,800 people. This capacity would be reached sometime
between 2015 and 2020, if water supply and other resources are
adequate. The Clean Air Plan (June 1991 draft) contains two
population projection series for San Luis Obispo. The lower
series shows a population of 57,465 in the year 2015 and 60,657
in 2020. Therefore, the general plan and water treatment
capacities are within the Clean Air Plan growth projections, and
no further analysis of air quality impacts due to population growth
is required for this project.
4. Address the fate of the ozone not vented to the destruction unit.
Response: The ozone contact basin will have several features to contain the
ozone gas and to minimize the amount of dissolved ozone in
water leaving the contact basin.
A. The contact basin will be fully covered. It will be
maintained at a negative pressure, so any leak would result
in atmospheric air flowing into the basin, rather ozone -rich
air flowing out.
B. After ozone has been introduced to the water, it will flow
slowly through enclosed cells where there is no further
ozonation, to allow the ozone (which is unstable in water)
to decompose.
C. Before the water leaves the contact -basin system, it will
flow over a weir to remove most of any remaining ozone.
According to Black & Veatch, the engineering firm designing the
plant upgrade, "Our experience indicates that facilities designed
with these features will operate with very low ozone residuals in
the water exiting-the basin and [concentrations will] comply with
air quality regulations."
David F. Romero, Public Works Director
5. The executive summary should clearly state that the plant's capacity is 11.5
mgd, following the 1977 upgrade.
Response: Noted.
1
Water Treatment EIR - Response to Comments 3
6. Water treatment capacity is not a threshold which constrains growth.
Response: The City's Development Impact Review Procedures (Municipal
Code Chapter 2.44, once known as "Ordinance 604," and
Resolution 4379) set a rate of water treatment which, if exceeded,
require a public hearing and formal determination on appropriate
action. The action may include capital facility projects to expand
capacity, postponing approval of development projects, or both.
That rate of treatment was exceeded during hot fall weather
several years ago, prompting the required hearing and
determination. Some changes were made to allow water to be
drawn more quickly from the reservoirs, and to more easily switch
from one reservoir to the other. This project is proposed in part
to increase the treatment capacity, in response to those
requirements, so additional development may occur.
The recently established water impact fees confirm that additional
treatment capacity is needed to serve growth. If the capacity was
not expanded, the city would have to build additional facilities to
store treated water so peak demands could be met, risk not
meeting peak demands with increasing frequency, or curtail
development (even if annual water supply was adequate).
7. The initial study unrealistically implies that growth will stop in the year 2015.
Response: The general plan establishes a development capacity, which may
be reached in about 25 years. As that build -out capacity is
approached, the community will have to decide whether it wants
to maintain that capacity or expand it. Measures which would
delay reaching the water- treatment capacity, which would be
expanded by the proposed project, include:
A. Slower growth;
B. Water conservation;
C. Use of other sources, such as groundwater and reclaimed
water, which would not be treated at the Stenner Canyon
plant.
gmD: WTR -COIN. W P
STENNER CANYON WATER TREATMENT PLANT EIR
STATUS OF IMPACTS, MITIGATION, AND MONITORING
Status of impacts
Potentially significant as originally proposed, but reduced to insignificant levels due to
mitigation measures to be incorporated in the project:
Community plans and goals (consistency with general plan Energy Conservation
Element);
Energy use.
Potentially significant as originally proposed, but found not to be significant in initial
study or EIR:
Population distribution and growth;
Transportation and circulation;
Noise levels;
Air quality;
Aesthetics;
No impact, or not potentially significant:
Land use;
Public services;
Utilities;
Geologic & seismic hazards & topographic modifications;
Surface water flow and quality;
Plant life;
Animal life;
Archaeological /historical;
Public safety - toxics.
Mitigation
Mitigation for increased energy use will include the following:
Thirteen general and 24 lighting measures recommended for the existing plant,
summarized on pages 17 and 18 of the draft EIR;
Use of variable - frequency drives on 65- horsepower water pumps for the ozone
cooling process;
Use of T8 fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts in place of T12's in 14
applications;
Use of PL fluorescent lamps in place of incandescent lamps in two applications.
Water Treatment EIR - Response to Comments 5
Other energy conservation and water conservation measures which the City is pursuing
will mitigate energy usage, though they are not listed as mitigation for this project.
Monitoring
Implementation of the mitigation measures will be monitored by the City's Energy
Conservation Coordinator, assisted by the City's Water Division Manager, as
construction drawings and specifications for the project are prepared and presented
for City Council approval.
�,t� --
�"
Resolu',tion "B"
RESOLUTION NO. 7047 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION
TO DENY A REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT MAP
AND ZONING MAP TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATIONS FROM
CONSERVATION /OPEN SPACE (C /OS) TO OFFICE (O -PD)
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PRADO ROAD
AND HIGHWAY 101 (40 PRADO ROAD)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. 'That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicants' request GP /R
1516 and PD 1517, the appellants' statements, and the Planning
Commission's action, staff recommendations and reports thereon,
makes the following finding:
1. The proposed project warrants further consideration and
environmental review and detailed project analysis should
be completed.
SECTION 2. The proposed amendments and preliminary
development plan will continue to be processed by the Community
Development Department. Further processing of the requests will
include review by the Planning Commission.
On motion of Councilwoman- -Rappa
seconded by Councilman Reiss and on the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: None
R -7047
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 5th' day
of November , 1991.
ATTEST:
l/
City Verk Pam vo
APPROVED:
City Admi istrative Officer
C' orn y
��,.
,�
� � ��
C
� ��l �;O ✓
,�'
RESOLUTION NO. 70 _.' (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL_ OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FOR ANIMAL REGULATION SERVICES FOR 1991 -94 FISCAL YEARS.
Be it resolved.by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
Section 1. That the agreement with the County of San Luis
Obispo for Animal Regulation services for fiscal years 1991 -92,
1992 -93, 1993 -94 (Exhibit A) has been reviewed and.is approved.
Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to enact the
agreement.
ou Gilman
On motion of Councilman Reiss y seconded. by ioanlman , and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss; Roalman and Mayor Dunin
.NOES: None
ABSENT.: Noise
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted.this 5th day of _
November 1991.
DUNIN, MAYOR
Arrxuvsll:
s
JOHN DUN$, CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
W,TZ, I I , -
WILLIAM STATLER,
. GARDINER, CHIEF OF POLICE
0
R -7046
�� :)-) sw° a
i
RESOLUTION NO. 7045' (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2077 .
(VILLAGE PARK CONDOMINIUMS, 145 SOUTH STREET)
The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo resolves as
follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. After considering the tentative map
of Tract 2077, the Planning Commission's recommendation, and
staff report and recommendation, the Council makes the following
findings:
1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements
are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the R -.3 -PD zone, including exceptions
to property - development standards approved with the
preliminary development plan.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause serious health problems, substantial .
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not conflict with easement for access through (or use
of property within) the proposed subdivision.
5. The proposed project has been granted a negative declaration
of environmental impact, based on the following mitigation
measures being incorporated in the project (Initial Study
69 -89):
A. Applicant shall provide a traffic - signal actuator,
approved by the Fire Department, at the intersection of
Higuera and South streets prior to project occupancy.
B. Final plans will reflect one or a combination of the
following measures to reduce to acceptable levels
traffic noise exposure along South Street:
- Relocation of decks to building elevations facing
east, south, or west;
- Provision of glass screens above solid deck
railings;
R -7045
Resolution No. 7045
Tract 2077
(1991 Series)
- Extension of the solid deck railings from about
three feet to about six feet tall.
LA
C. A qualified archaeologist will instruct the project's
construction contractors in how to recognize resources
that may be encountered. If excavations encounter
archaeological resources, construction activities which
may affect them shall cease until the extent of the
resource is determined and appropriate protective
measures are approved by the Community Development.
Director. The Community Development Director shall be
notified of the extent and location of discovered
materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified
archaeologist. Disposition of artifacts shall comply
with state and federal laws. A note concerning this
requirement shall be included on the grading and
construction plans for the project.
D. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any
substantial construction on the site, the applicant
shall provide to the city Fire department an assessment
of soil and groundwater contamination for the entire
site. The extent of the investigation, the form of the
report, and any required decontamination shall be
subject to approval by the city Fire Department.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map
for Tract 2077 shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. All units shall be served by individual sewer, water,
telephone, cable television, gas, electricity. All new
utilities within the tract shall be placed underground in
easements to the approval of the appropriate utility company
and the City Engineer. Water meters shall be clustered in
the public sidewalk along Beebee Street and South Street to
the approval of the Public Works Department and the
Utilities Department.
2. The on -site sanitary sewer main shall be private, maintained
by the Homeowners Association. Individual water service
shall be by manifolds installed along the public street
frontage, in accordance with City Standards.
3. Final map shall note entire common lot area as a blanket
utility easement (exclusive of buildings) acceptable to the
utility companies and City Engineer.
'J
Resolution No. 7045 (1991 Series) 3
Tract 2077
4. All on -site driveways, nonstructural parking improvements,
and utilities shall be installed as subdivision
improvements..
5. Subdivider shall dedicate and improve street right -of -way,
including bus pull -out, along the project's South Street
frontage. Improvements shall be constructed per City
Standards, including gutter, curb, integral six -foot
sidewalk, and street pavement, to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer.
Subdivider shall install frontage improvements along Beebee
Street and Bridge Street per city standards, as required by
the planned - development rezoning. The existing
nonstructural pavement in Beebee Street shall be removed and
replaced the entire width of the street, per City Standards
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
6. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and
restrictions (CC &R's) to be approved by the City Attorney
and Community Development Director prior to final map
approval. CC &R's shall contain the following provisions:
a. Creation of a homeowners' association to enforce the
CC &R's and provide for professional, perpetual
maintenance of all common area including private
driveways, drainage, parking lot areas, walls and
fences, lighting, and landscaping in a first class
condition.
b. Grant to the City the right to maintain common area if
the homeowners' association fails to perform, and to
assess the homeowners' association for expenses
incurred, and the right of the City to inspect the site
at mutually agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's
and final map are being met.
C. No parking except in approved, designated spaces.
d. Grant to the City the right to tow away vehicles on a
complaint basis which are parked in unauthorized
places.
e. Prohibition of storage or other uses which would
conflict with the use of garages for parking purposes.
f. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motor homes, or
trailers nor long -term storage of inoperable vehicles.
Resolution No: 7045
Tract 2077
(1991 Series)
g. No outdoor storage by individual units except in
designated storage areas.
4
h. No change in City - required provisions of the CC &R's
without prior City Council approval.
i. Homeowners' association shall file with the City Clerk
the names and addresses of all officers of the
homeowners' association within 15 days of any change in
officers of the association.
j. Provision of appropriate "no parking" signs and
red- curbing along interior roadways as required by the
City Fire Department.
k. Allowance for outdoor clothes drying in locations
screened from general public view.
7. All units shall be numbered in accordance with an addressing
plan approved by the Community Development Director..
8. Subdivider shall install a unit identification plan with
directory at the project entrance to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
9. Trees shown to remain on the approved preliminary
development plan shall be protected during construction to
the satisfaction of the City Arborist. Subdivider shall,
before starting site grading, submit a tree protection
agreement and surety acceptable to the City, to guarantee
protection and /or replacement of the tree to be preserved.
10. All boundary monuments, lot corners, and centerline
intersections, beginning -of- curves and end -of curves shall
be tied to the City's control network. At least two control
points shall be used and a tabulation of the coordinates
shall be submitted with the final map. A 5 -1/4" computer
floppy disk, containing the appropriate data for use in
Autocad geographic information system, shall be submitted to
the City Engineer.
11. Subdivider shall obtain an easement for storm water
drainage, over the adjacent property to the south, to Bridge
Street, in a form satisfactory to the City Engineer.
12. The site shall be raised above the 100 -year storm elevations
to eliminate the Special Flood Hazard Zones (A, AO -2), to
allow the proposed underground parking as approved under PD
1483, prior to issuance of building permits.
Resolution No. 7045 (1991 Series) 5
Tract 2071
Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall process an
amendment to the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and shall
submit satisfactory evidence to the City Engineer from the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that upon grading
of the site per the final grading plan that FEMA will
approve such amendments.
13: Subdivider shall provide to the Community Development
Director an instrument agreeing to retain lot 3 of block 153
of Harford's Addition as a mobile home park for not less
than five years, and lot 4 of the same block and tract as a
mobile home park for not less than 10 years; such instrument
shall be recorded at the office of the County Recorder
before issuance of building permits or recordation of the
final tract map, whichever occurs sooner.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by Councilman Reiss ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 29th
day of October , 1991.
r Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTE
City Tlerk Pam o es
R -7045
Resolution No. 7045 (1991 Series) 6
Tract 2077
PIM2 ;IOWA; 4 ��
City A inistrative Officer
dify Atforney
Community Development Director
gmD: 2077- res.wp
R -7045
vV
RESOLUTION NO. 7044 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION
NO. MS 91 -115 LOCATED AT 1139 IRIS STREET AND 1136 GEORGE STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the vesting tentative map of Minor Subdivision
MS 91 -115 and the Community Development Director's
recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports thereof,
makes the following findings:
1. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the general
plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the R -2 zone.
3. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious
health problems, substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with
easements for access through (or use of property within) the
proposed subdivision.
5. The City Council has determined that the proposed
subdivision will not have a significant effect on the
environment and approves the negative declaration filed by
the Community Development Director.
SECTION 2. Exceptions. Approval of exceptions to allow lot
area of 3,750 square feet where a minimum lot area of 6000 square
feet is normally required; lot depth of 75 feet where a minimum.
of 90 feet is normally required; and a lot width of 50 feet where
60 feet is normally required are hereby approved, based on the
following findings:
R -7044
Resolution No. 7044(1991 Series)
Minor Subdivision 91 - -115
Page 2
1. The property is such a size and shape that it is undesirable
to conform to the strict application of lot area and
dimension standards.
2. The exceptions will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare, nor will they be injurious to other
properties in the vicinity.
3. The cost to the subdivider of strict compliance with the
standards is not the sole reason for granting the
exceptions.
4. Granting the requested exceptions is consistent with the
intent and purposes of the Subdivision Regulations, and is
consistent with the General Plan.
SECTION 3. Conditions. The approval of the vesting
tentative map for MS 91 -115 is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for review,
approval and recordation. The map shall be prepared by, or
under the supervision of, a registered civil engineer or
licensed land surveyor.
2. Subdivider shall provide individual electrical, cable
television, and natural .gas services and metering for each
unit to the approval.of affected public utility agencies and
the City Engineer.
3. Subdivider shall provide individual water services and sewer
connections for each lot, to the approval.of the City
Engineer.
SECTION 4. Code Requirements. The-following represent
standard requirements required by various codes, ordinances, and
policies of the City of San Luis Obispo, but are not limited to
the following:
1. Subdivider shall abandon all utility services which cross
the newly created property line, to the approval of. the
Chief Building Official, or provide appropriate easements to
the approval of the Chief Building Official and City
Resolution No. 7044 (1991 Series)
Minor subdivision 91 -115
Page 3
Engineer.
2. Subdivider shall provide an easement for existing private
storm drain across Lot 1.
3. Lot corners shall be staked by a registered civil engineer
or licensed land surveyor.
On motion of Councilman Reiss ,
seconded by Councilwoman Ra
following roll call vote:
, and on the
AYES: Counclmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 29th day
of October , 1991.
-400 000V
ayor Ron nin
ATTEST• r
V
City C erk Pam V s
R -7044
}
Resolution No. 7044 (1991 Series)
Minor Subdivision 91 -115
.Page 4
APPROVED:
ity Adm'nistrative Officer
��,
a� � �t
�,.�t
�.
ice• � �
J
RESOLUTION NO. 7042 (1991 SERIES)
APPROVAL OF RESERVE USE GUIDELINES
FOR THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
AND PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council has established reserves for the
Human Relations Commission and Promotional Coordinating Committee
Grants -In -Aid Programs, and
WHEREAS, the reserves have been established to fund
unanticipated expenses for non- profit agencies (meeting Grants-
In -Aid Program criteria) that arise after adoption of the annual
Grants -In -Aid budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has requested the Human Relations
Commission and the Promotional Coordinating Committee to develop
guidelines for dispersing their reserves; and
WHEREAS, the Human Relations Commission and Promotional
Coordinating Committee have developed such guidelines to satisfy
the Council's request.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo that the attached "Guidelines for Using Grants-
In-Aid Reserves" as developed by the Human Relations Commission
(Attachment 1) and Promotional Coordinating Committee (Attachment
2) are approved.
R -7042
Resolution No
Page 2
1,
7042
(1991 Series)
V
Upon
motion of Councilwoman Rappa
, seconded
by Councilman
Roalman
and on the following
roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 29th day of October
1991.
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
P," U
Pam Vo s, City Cl&k
APPROVED•
R -7042
\hrcpcc.res
��� ��� n
1 � ��`��
tr
Q ��,�.
��
. - .. ., u. -. ...W
t. -
�.:
. _..
\ �
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
GUIDELINES FOR USING GIA RESERVE
* Reserve monies are available to any non - profit agency that meets established
criteria for the grants -in -aid program. (See Exhibit 1)
* Reserve monies can only be used to fund one -time emergency or extraordinary
needs that arise after adoption of the annual grants -in -aid budget.
Requests for use of reserve funding must come jointly from an agency's Board
of Directors and Executive Director.
* Requests for funding must include a detailed description of what the monies are
being requested for, how the monies will be spent, and why the existing budget
cannot accommodate the expenditure.
* Requests for funding will be reviewed in accordance with established criteria for
the grants -in -aid program. (See Exhibit 1)
dh \giaresery
Attachment 1
1 r
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
GRANTS -IN -AID CRITERIA FOR FUNDING
1. Applicant agencies must offer their services to all residents of San Luis Obispo,
regardless of race, religion, ethnic background, mental or physical handicap,
sexual orientation, or other socio- economic factors.
2. Applicant proposals must be compatible with the current goals and objectives
of the Human Relations Commission and of the Grants -In -Aid program itself.
These goals and objectives will be discussed in detail at the applicant information
workshop.
3. Applicant proposals that request funding for staffing will not be considered.
Grants -In -Aid funding is available for non- staffing related costs that are needed
in connection with providing an agency's services.
4. Applicant agencies must possess and demonstrate the managerial and fiscal
competence to effectively carry out the proposed program..
5. Applicant agencies must provide direct services to City residents and offer a clear
description of how city funds will be used in those efforts.
6. Applicant agencies must secure funding from a variety of sources other than the
City of San Luis Obispo.
7. Applicant agencies must demonstrate a high level of cooperation with existing
related programs and other community resources.
8. Applicant agencies must demonstrate a high level of volunteer participation.
9. Applicant agencies must demonstrate a high level of financial need.
\dh \giacrit
Exhibit 1
PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
GUIDELINES FOR USING GIA RESERVE
* Reserve monies are available to any non - profit agency that meets established
criteria for the grants -in -aid program. (See Exhibit 1)
* Reserve monies can be used to fund start up costs for new programs or
extraordinary needs that arise after adoption of the annual grants -in -aid budget.
* Requests for use of reserve funding must come jointly from an agency's Board
of Directors and Executive Director.
* Requests for funding must include a detailed description of what the monies are
being requested for, how the monies will be spent, and.why the existing budget
cannot accommodate the expenditure.
* Requests for funding will be reviewed in accordance with established criteria for
the grants -in -aid program. (See Exhibit 1)
dh \giareserv2
Attachment 2
PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
GRANTS -IN -AID
ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES
The Promotional Coordinating Committee uses speck guidelines'to determine whether
an agency or organization qualifies for consideration.
1. Applicant organizations must have non - profit status (Articles of Inc. 501, CS status,
Federal ID number, and Tax Exempt Notification) prior to submitting proposals for
funding.
2. Application must be completed in full and be submitted on ti me. Late orincomplete
applications will not be considered.,
3. At least one representative from each applicant agency will be required to attend
the workshop, which details the application process. This person should be
knowledgeable of their agency's background and needs, be directly involved in
preparing the grant application, and available as a contact person throughout the
funding period.
4. Applicant organization must have in place plans for sound financial management
and accountability.
5. Applicant organization must have in place goats and objectives, which have been
clearly stated in quantifiable terms.
6. The City is reluctant to fund new projects which duplicate existing programs,
services, or events. Applicant organizations must demonstrate a unique quality
to their program, as well' as demonstrate resident need,
7. Applicant organizations who received Promotional Coordinating Committee Grants-
In-Aid funding for FY 1990 -91 must submit their mid -year progress reports to the
City. The reports which were due January 31, 1991 may be submitted with the
organization's FY 1991 -92 Grants-ln -Aid proposal.
EXHIBIT.1
PROMOTIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
GRANTS -IN -AID ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The City of San Luis Obispo's Promotional Coordinating Committee, under direction of
the City Council, recognizes that social, cultural, recreational, and performing arts
organizations have made, and continue to make, significant contributions to the overall
quality of life in San Luis Obispo. In order for these and other newly created organizations
to effectively carry out their respective responsibilities, financial support is necessary. The
City of San Luis Obispo's Grants-In-Aid program is one funding source helping` these
organizations to meet their operating costs.
Given the limited amount of funds available for service organizations, it is imperative that
these funds be made available to the organizations that need them most and which
demonstrate their effectiveness in meeting existing community needs. There is a "needs %.
a "financial resources', and a "service level" element in setting priorities. The Promotional
Coordinating Committee will make every effort to bring these items into balance in their
decision making process. With this objective in. mind, and in order to maintain a non-
e. discriminatory approach in the recommended allocation of funds; the following
assessment criteria will be used.
Applicants should be aware that there is no guarantee that funding will be. available to
them in future fiscal years. Dependence on future City funding is discouraged.
I. Applicant proposals must be compatible with the current goals and objectives of
the PCC and of the Grants -In -Aid program as stated on page 7,. Item C.
2. Applicant organization must have a clearly stated purpose and function in the fields
related to City policy and must be responsible for the planning and provision of
these services.
3. Applicants must demonstrate that they have the managerial and fiscal competence
to complete the proposed project.
4. Preference will be given to those organizations which intend to use GIA funding
to provide direct services, and which provide a clear description of how they intend
to use City funding.
5. The organization shall give evidence that they have explored other sources of
financial support, and that it has examined and weighed the financial ability of the
target population to support its program, service, or event.
S. The organization shall extend its program to the general public and shall not
exclude anyone by reason of race, religion, ethnic background, or any other
population covered by_ state or federal law.
7. An organization must be willing- to evaluate itself according to an established
criteria, to ensure that standards of service, goals, and objectives are being met.
The applicant organization must be willing to participate in an evaluation process
as requested by the Promotional Coordinating Committee.
S. Applicants should be able to demonstrate coordination with related agencies and
- existing community resources.
S. '. Other types of City support, such as facility use or in -kind service, may be
considered in the award process.
10. Demonstrated financial need of the organization may be considered in evaluating
and awarding funds.
^ 11.; . Past service of the organization, regardless of financial need, may be considered
in awarding. funds.
,4k Q
I
C' 717as
OOC. N0.
OFRCIA.L RECORDS
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO., CA
6 .0" r)F
Recording requested by NOV 1 4 1991 at;�Cr!LI.
and when recorded mail to: FRANv) EY 5583
City Clerk Couilty Clark- Re=iJer
City of San Luis Obispo TIME 9 : 15 am
P. 0. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
RESOLUTION NO. 7043 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PORTIONS OF MUTSUHITO
AND FREDERICKS AVENUES., BETWEEN VICTORIA STREET AND
THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY ARE
UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC PURPOSES
AND ORDERING THE ABANDONMENT OF SAME
SUBJECT TO RECORDATION OF TRACT NO. 2066
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the public hearing duly held
on October 2.9, 1991, pursuant to Section 8300 et seq. of the
California Streets and Highways Code, this Council finds and
determines that those portions of Mutsuhito and Fredericks Avenue
rights -of -way as described and shown on the map marked "Exhibit
A", attached hereto and incorporated herein are not necessary for
present or future public purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of
said right -of =way subject to
final map for Tract No. 2066.
Concurrent - recordation of the
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of
this Order of Abandonment, duly attested under the seal of the
City to be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County
°ai::CEIVED
NOV 1 J I991
CITY CLERK
AN LUIS OB!S'Po.
R -7043
VOL 3784PAGF217
�. � �. �,.
;M1
�: �: ". Ir. -..
i'J 1'f . �
.: S � ..f Fi ���`:
Resolution No. 7043 (1991 Series)
Page Two.
of San Luis Obispo, upon satisfaction of the condition mentioned
in Section 2 above.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa, seconded by Councilman Reiss. ,
and on the following roll call vote.
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 29th day of
October , 1991.
YOR Ron Du `...:�P 2 °
TES
.7 Tl', LERK Pam o es
A(PPRO
City A ministrative Officer
Community Deve pment Director
City E ginger
R: erry \MutsuAb.wp
R -7043
HL e7 184nr.218
z
Q
LAIYREKCE DRIVE 30 '.'':
;• : ^. 16
ABANDONED :''•'
z '�.•'
15 M N IAN
A or. :
MUTSEWTO J60�1': :..`:i :: i :.: d VE..' >':'•'.':'•'.': :`. '..
Q GO
Pal, 2 Pc I s
144 46
LEGAL s�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
MUTSOHITO AND FREDERICX AVENUES ABANDONMENTS
Those - portions of Mutsuhito and Frederick Avenues as shown on the
map of the Imperial Addition to the City of San Luis Obispo as
recorded in Book A of Maps, at Page 128; in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Luis Obispo.County, State of California,
more particularly described as follows:
A. MUTSUHITO AVENUE -
That portion of Mutsuh.ito Avenue lying northeasterly of Victoria
Street per aforesaid map..
B. FREDERICK AVENUE -
That portion of Frederick Avenue lying southeasterly,of the
northeasterly prolongation of the northwesterly R/W line of
Lawrence Drive (formerly Kuanq Su Avenue);
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, that portion lying southwesterly of the
centerline of Frederick Avenue_ and northwesterly of the
northeasterly prolongation of the southeasterly R/W line of
Lawrence Drive.
CI jJ Of "EXHIBIT A''
SA1 ! JUIS OBISPO ABANDONMENT OF PORTIONS OF
Public Works Department MUTSUHITO & FREDERICKS
.955 Morro -St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93601 AVENUES
� 'v w v� ■ r r
TO BE-
MIP1
END OF DOCUMENT VOL 3784PAff219
• •
• w
w u
R
r u
u
• •
0
1Jr
A
i
RESOLUTION NO. 7041 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN.LUIS OBISPO
GIVING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BLANKET AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
RIGHT -OF -WAY CERTIFICATIONS FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has declared it to
be in the national interest for federal funds to be expended for
highway projects; and
WHEREAS, the City and the State has entered into Master
Agreement No. 05 -5016 for Federal -Aid Projects; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to receiving any Federal -Aid funds
the City agrees to comply with all Federal and State laws,
policies and procedures; and
WHEREAS, Federal procedures require the submittal of a
resolution by the governing body that authorizes execution of the
Right -of -Way Certification document;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo, California, hereby gives the Director of Public
Works of the City of San Luis Obispo authority to execute Right-
of -Way Certifications for Federal -Aid projects.
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rama , seconded by Councilman Roalman
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -704 1
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 29th day of
October , 1991.
ATTEST:
CITY CLARK Pam Vog s
APPROVED:
l
City A inistrative Officer
Finance Director
Public Works Director
j112,1ed -aid
by
MAYOR Ron Dunin
R-7041
�.� -_
���
J�
�,,��• 6
L "�a
,�,
;.
,.:, ..
,.:, ..
RESOLUTION NO. 7040
(1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LIIIS
OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AND SAN LIIIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD_
CONTROL DISTRICT ZONE 9
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a participant in San
Luis Obispo County Flood Control District Zone 9; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is eligible for monies
for designated repair and maintenance programs in the City creeks:.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San.Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The certain agreement attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference between the City of San Luis
Obispo and San Luis Obispo County Flood Control District Zone 9 is
hereby approved and
the Mayor is
authorized to execute
the
same.
On motion of a
mcilmn Roalman ,
seconded by Councilwoman RanUa
,
and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES : Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dmin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 29th day
Of (�tober , 1991.
R-7040
(A- 144- 91 -CC)
R
N
R-7040
(A- 144- 91 -CC)
Resolution No. 7040
Page 2
APPROVED:
Cit nistr ive Off cer
(1991 Series)
Public Works Director
Streets Manager !
a*29ag691.wp
R -7040
AGREEMENT # A- 144 -91 -CC
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ZONE 9 AND THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR STREAMBED CLEARING
PROGRAM, GIANT REED ERADICATION PROGRAM,
AND STREAMBED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
This Agreement entered into the 29th day of October ,
1991, between the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District, Zone 9 (hereinafter referred to as "Zone 9")
and the City of San Luis Obispo (hereinafter referred to as
"City");
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, Zone 9 since its inception, has had a streambed
clearing program which encompasses the mainstreams of the San Luis
Obispo Creek system; and
WHEREAS, certain reaches of these streams lie within the City
of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, the City has also had a streambed clearance program;
and
WHEREAS, the program within the City of San Luis Obispo should
be more economically performed if one agency accomplished the
streambed clearance program; and
WHEREAS, such a cooperative program was successfully carried
out in the last several fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, Zone 9 work has been accomplished with the
cooperation of personnel from the California Conservation Corps;
and
WHEREAS, a continuation of the cooperative program between
Zone 9 and the City could still involve the assistance of the
California Conservation Corps; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that Zone 9 and the City
understand and agree to the services to be performed by each with
respect to the streambed clearing program; and
A- 144 -91 -CC
(R -7040)
WHEREAS, a growth of Giant Reeds in the Zone 9 watershed have
proved to be a flood control problem; and
WHEREAS,_ appropriate maintenance management leading to the
control and /or eradication of the Giant Reed is necessary; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that Zone 9 and the City
cooperate on the needed Giant Reed control and /or eradication
program; and
WHEREAS, the Zone 9 Advisory Committee has considered small
improvement projects for erosion control and flood control
benefits; and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the Flood Control Zone
9 and the City, to cooperate on the needed small improvement
projects; and
WHEREAS, the 1991 -92 budget appropriation includes $60,000 for
the streambed clearing program and $5,000 for the Giant Reed
Eradication Program.
WHEREAS, the 1991 -92 budget appropriates $350,000 for small
improvement projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
conditions, promises and agreements herein set forth, Zone 9 and
City mutually covenant and agree as follows:
STREAMBED CLEARING AND GIANT REED ERADICATION PROGRAM:
1.. Zone 9 and City will accomplish streambed clearing within the
San Luis Obispo Creek watershed with the City being
responsible for the prompt and efficient execution of the
entire program within the City limits and Zone 9 being
responsible for the prompt and efficient execution of the
balance of the program in the unincorporated portion of the
zone.
2. Zone 9 will provide funds to the City for the City to
accomplish the Giant Reed control and /or eradication program
within Zone 9.
3. The City shall be provided not more than $55,000 of the funds
budgeted in Zone 9 in the 1991 -92 fiscal year for the
streambed clearance program and an additional sum of not more
than $2,000 for the Giant Reed control. and /or eradication
program.
4. Zone 9 will reimburse the City, within the limits set forth in
Paragraph 3 above, upon receipt of evidence of work performed
on the basis of monthly statements submitted for payment.
5. All streambed maintenance work provided for by this agreement
shall be done in accordance with the following provisions of
the 1979 Memorandum of Understanding: "Work performed under
this agreement will be conducted within the following streams:
a. San Luis Obispo Creek
b. Lower watershed of Laguna Lake, including Prefumo
Creek but not Sycamore Creek
C. Old Garden Creek to Foothill Boulevard
d. Stenner Creek
e. Brizziolari Creek
Local drainage facilities such as subdivision drains, curbs,
gutters and streets and minor drainage ways not listed above
would be the responsibility of the jurisdiction within which
boundaries the facility lies, or the responsibility of the
private property owner if the facility is not publicly owned.
The streambed maintenance work is envisioned to generally
involve removal of debris which adversely affects the capacity
of the waterways or which might create a greater expense for
its removal at a different location if moved by flood flows at
a later date. It would also involve some streambed vegetation
maintenance to maintain streambed capacity. It would not
include streambed maintenance to the origin of each stream but
primarily include the lower reaches of each stream system. It
would not include abatement of flood hazards under the City's
abatement ordinances. It is also understood that all
streambed maintenance work will be performed under permit from
the State Fish & Game. Permits for work inside the City
limits shall be obtained by the City. Permits for work
outside of the City limits shall be obtained by the County
Flood Control Zone 9."
a. Old Garden Creek at Mountain View -- estimate cost
of $25,000 to replace the culvert floor which is
failing.
b. One -half of the cost of the study on the
feasibility of constructing a detention dam or dams
on the upper San Luis Obispo Creek to lessen the
flood hazard to the City and other downstream
properties -- estimate total cost of not more than
$50,000 of which Zone 91s maximum contribution
would be $25,000.
C. Prefumo Creek Outfall at Los Osos Valley Road --
Replace deteriorating concrete wall with Gabions to
prevent bank erosion. Estimated cost $50,000.
d. San Luis Obispo Creek at Madonna Road - - Remove
gravel from the concrete lined banks to restore to
full flow capacity. Estimated cost $20,000.
e. San Luis Obispo Creek at Mission Trailer Park (546
Higuera) -- Remove obstructions and stabilize banks
that have encroached into the channel.. Estimated
cost $30,000.
f. Prefumo Creek at Laguna' Lake -- Remove silt and
debris deposits at the point the Creek discharges
into Laguna Lake to open up the channel capacity.
Estimated cost $50,000.
14. City shall provide all design drawings and related services
for the small improvement projects which are to be constructed
and shall arrange for a consultant to perform the.study for
the detention dam(s) program. City shall also act as the lead
agency in complying with the California Environmental Quality
Act.
15. Zone 9 shall reimburse City for not more than $200,000 for
said small improvement project program and any expenditures
made by City in excess of that amount shall be paid at the
sole expense of City.
16. Maintenance. City shall maintain all completed works at no
cost to Zone 9..
17. Ownership and Liability. City shall assume ownership and
liability for the completed works.
GENERAL TERMS:
18. Term. This agreement will commence on July 1, 1991 and
terminate on June 30, 1992.
19. Indemnification and Sole Conduct. Each party hereto shall
defend, indemnify and save harmless the other party and other
party's officers, agents and employees from and against all
claims, demands, liability cost; expense, damages, causes of
action, including but not limited. to inverse condemnation and
- judgments arising out of the sole negligence or sole
intentional acts of the party or its officers, agents or
employees or independent contractors solely responsible to
such party in performing or attempting to perform pursuant to
the provisions of this agreement including both acts and
omissions to act.
20. Indemnification for joint conduct between Zone 9 and the City.
The City shall defend, indemnify and save harmless County, and
its officers, agents and employees from and against any and
all claims, demands, liabilities., costs, expenses, damages,
causes of action including but not limited to inverse
condemnation and judgments arising out of the joint negligence
or joint intentional acts of City and Zone 9 and their
officers, agents, employees or independent contractors
directly responsible to them in performing or attempting to
perform pursuant to the provisions of this agreement including
both acts and omissions and to act provided however that
County shall be solely responsible for the amount of judgment
rendered solely against the Zone 9 or one of its agents or
employees if such judgment is specifically rendered in court
.finding of responsibility by Zone 9 or one of its agents or
employees for an act of negligence and City shall not be
required to indemnify Zone 9 for such judgment. Likewise City
shall be solely responsible for any judgment rendered solely
against it or its agents or employees which is based upon acts
or omission by it or one of its agents or employees. .
21. Zone .9 agrees to cooperate with City in the defense of any
such claims or litigations.
i
i
6. The streambed maintenance program is a flood control program
and City shall use funds provided under this agreement for
only that purpose.
7. Consistent with previous practices, there shall be an annual
reconnaissance survey made by City and County within their
respective jurisdictions of needed works and such shall be
done reasonably before the rainy season in order that the
needed streambed clearing program can be carried out prior to
the rainy season with follow -up work done during the rainy
season as appropriate.
8. For control of vegetation, principally willows; the streambed
maintenance program may be accomplished with the use of State
Fish & Game approved herbicides.
9. Within the City of San Luis Obispo, City shall be responsible
for acquiring any landowner permission needed to accomplish
the streambed clearing program. The City shall be responsible
for acquiring any landowner permission to accomplish the Giant
Reed control and/or eradication program.
10. The City shall act as the lead agency in complying with the
California Environmental Quality Act for work done within the
City limits.
11. Zone 9 will assist City in obtaining California Conservation
Corps, cooperation on work within the City limits and will be
responsible for arrangements with the California Conservation
Corps for work outside of the City limits but within the Zone
9 boundaries.
12. Should the streambed clearing program within the City involve
the abatement of nuisances, the removal of trees, or the like,
such shall be performed in accordance with due process of law
under the City's abatement ordinances or State law and shall
be the sole responsibility of City.
SMALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM:
13. Zone 9 shall provide funding up to an amount of $200,000 for
the City to accomplish the following improvement projects
program:
0
i
1
IN WITNESS "EREOF Zone 9 and City have executed this contract on
the day and year first hereinabove set forth.
By
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD.CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Zone 9
of the
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
County Counsel
By 1 By: —
Date : Dated:
ATTEST:
Citj Clerk, Pame
0
of Supervisors
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By: -
unin
ATTEST:
=RANCIS Mi. COCNE:y
Voges Clerk, Board of Supervisors
k)) . ate, "bT+
A- 144 -91 -CC
dj \fcwcd9..agr.ams
RESOLUTION NO. 7039
(1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN.LUIS OBISPO APPROVING TRAFFIC WORK ORDERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
The Traffic Work Orders for the period of July 1, 1991
through September 30, 1991 are hereby approved.
On motion of Councilwoman Ranna , seconded by CoiinriIman
Roalman , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, and Roalman
NOES: Councilmember Pinard and Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 29rh day
of October , 1991.
MATO--R Ron Dunin
ATT
L u
CI Y CLERK Drm Voges
APPROVED:
City Engineer
Jr2 /wrk -ord
by
R -7039
r . IV
/(„tip
ilill�lb1111������f Il ppi�pp I�II� Cl � O WI f San S OBI SPO
�I�Ui�ll
N COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
INNNO
x.70 31
MEETING DATE:
Oct. 1991
ITEM NUMB
FROM:
David F. Romero, Public Works Dire or
Wayne A. Peterson, City En
Prepared by: John Rawles, Engineering Assistant /Traffic
SUBJECT:
Traffic Work Orders for the Period of July 1; 1991 through September
30, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pass Resolution Approving Traffic Work Orders for the Period of July
11 1991 through September 30, 1991.
BACKGROUND:'
The City Engineer has, over the past three months, issued work orders
making changes to improve safety and operation of the street system and
parking facilities. Of these work orders, 4% were for signal timing
changes; 2% bicycle facility installations; 9% for changes.in pavement
markings; 33% parking related; 24% were red curbing requests; and 28%
were for changes in signing.
It has been Council's policy in the past to accept this report on a
quarterly basis. This report satisfies this past policy.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Minor implementation costs associated with street maintenance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pass resolution approving traffic work orders for the period of July 1,
1991 through September 30, 1991.
Completed traffic work orders are available
in the Council Office for review.
Jr2/wrk -ora
by
ej_/
RESOLUTION NO. (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING TRAFFIC WORK ORDERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
The Traffic Work Orders for the period of July 1, 1991
through September 30, 1991 are hereby approved.
On motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this day
of , 1991.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED:
�
City A inistrative Officer
City Engineer
Jr2 /wrkord
by
Ccpr_ �
r
RESOLUTION NO. 7038 (1991 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO
THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR
TRACT NO. 1362 LOCATED AT 3563 SUELDO STREET
WHEREAS, the Sueldo Commerce Park Property Owner's Association
has applied to the City to amend Tract No. 1362 Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a hearing on October 1,
1991to consider amending the Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions of Tract No. 1362; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered staff recommendations
and reports on the requested amendments to the Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions of Tract No. 1362; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined
that amending the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions of Tract
No. 1362 is exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
of Tract No. 1362 may be amended by allowing up to three parking
spaces to be reserved for each condominium unit..
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,
seconded by Councilwoman Pinard , and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Pinard, Reiss., Roalman, Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -7038
Resolution No. 7038 (1991 Series)
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this lst day
of October r 1991.
n unin
ATTE
City lerk Pam q oges
APPROVED:
City A inistrative Officer
0
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7037__ (1991 SERIES)
SETTING FORTH THE AMOUNT OF FEES FOR ISSUANCE OF
DUPLICATE_ , BRANCH ESTABLISHMENT, AND CHANGE OF LOCATION
BUSINESS TAX CERTIFICATES
WHEREAS, Chapter 3.01 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code establishes
business taxes and provides for the setting of fees for issuing duplicate, branch
establishment, and change of location business tax certificates; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1202 was made available for public inspection and
review ten days prior to a public hearing held this matter on October -1; 1991; and public
notice was provided fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Sa Luis Obispo finds and
resolves that a fee in the amount of $ 0.00 (zero) be established for duplicate, branch
establishment, and change of location business tax certificates.
ou cilman ouncilwoman
Upon motion of o a 1 man , seconded by _a n n a and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Counc lmembers Roalman, Rappa., Pinard, Reiss, Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this l s t day of October 1991.
A
PaAVoges, City erk .
ayor Ron Dunin
Director of Finance -
R -7037
YPS
Ix
1
I
RESOLUTION NO. 7036 (1990 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2073
LOCATED AT 3150 ROCKVIEW -PLACE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Tract 2073 and the Planning
Commission's, recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof, makes the following findings:
le The design.of the subdivision is consistentwith the general
plan.
2. the site is physically suited for the type and density of
development Allowed in the R-2 zone.
3. The design of the subdivision is'hbt likely to cause serious
health problems, substantial environmental damage or . .
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife e or
their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision wil-1,not conflict with
easements for access through (or usage of property within)
the proposed.subdivision.,
5. The Council.has determined that the proposed subdivision
will not have a significant effect on the environment, and
approves the negative declaration filed by the Community
Development Director.
6. The proposed subdivision.will comply with the requirements
of City 6f.San Luis Obispo Clouncil,Resolution 6965 (1991
Series), which authorizes this,residential condominium
conversion, pursuant. to Chapter 17.82.of the Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map'
for Tract 2013 shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. Subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for review,
Approval and recordation.
2. Subdivider shall provide individual water services and other
utilities for each unit.; Water meters shall be clustered in
the public sidewalk, to the.approval of the City Engineer.
R-7036
Resolution No.
Tract 2073
Page 2
7036 (1991 Series)
3. Final map shall note a blanket easement over the common lot
area, except under structures, for underground public
utilities serving the site, to the approval of the City
Engineer and affected utility companies.
4. Subdivider shall dedicate to the City a drainage easement
over the existing channel located between Buildings 2 and 3,
to the approval of the City Engineer. Subdivider shall also
dedicate to the City an access easement to the channel and
to the sewer main located east of the channel, to the.
approval of the City Engineer.
5. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and
restrictions (CC &R's) to be approved by the City Attorney
and Community Development Director prior to final map
approval. CC &R's shall contain the following provisions:
a. Creation of a homeowners' association to enforce the
CC &R's and provide for professional, perpetual
maintenance of all common area including private
driveways, drainage, parking lot, walls and
fences, lighting, and landscaping in a first class
condition.
b. Grant to the city the right to maintain common area if
the homeowners' association fails to perform, and to
assess the homeowners' association for expenses
incurred, and the right of the city to inspect the site
at mutually agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's
and final map are being met.
C. No parking except in approved, designated spaces.
d. Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles on a
complaint basis which are parked in unauthorized
Places.
e. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, or
trailers nor long -term storage of inoperable vehicles.
f. No outdoor storage by individual units except in
designated storage areas.
g. No change in city- required provisions -of the CC &R's
without prior City Council approval.
h. Homeowners' association shall file with the City Clerk
the names and addresses of all officers of the
a
Resolution No. 7036 (1991 Series)
Tract 2073
Page 3
homeowners' association within 15 days of any change in
officers of the association.
i. Provision of appropriate "no_parking11 signs and
red - curbing along interior roadways as required by the
City Fire Department.
j. CC &R's shall not prohibit location of solar clothes
drying facilities in private yards which are
substantially screened from view.
6. Subdivider shall install a unit identification plan with
directory at the project's entrance, to the approval of the
Community.Development Director.
7. Subdivider shall provide one additional parking space or
bike racks which.meet city Parking and Driveway Standards,
prior to final map approval, to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
8. Subdivider shall refurbish and repair fire safety equipment
prior to final map approval, to the approval of the Fire
Marshal. Subdivider shall install fire sprinklers in
building 3. Subdivider shall either install fire sprinklers
in building 2; or improve the existing driveway to building
2 to meet city fire access standards.
9. Subdivider shall refurbish and repair the structures.and
building service equipment (piping., wiring, heaters, etc.),
as recommended in the property condition report, to the
approval of the Chief Building Official prior to final map
approval..
10. Subdivider shall enhance the riparian swale southerly of the
driveway with landscaping, and renovate existing landscape
areas and irrigation systems, consistent with city
guidelines for water conserving landscaping, to the approval
of the Community Development Director.
11. Subdivider shall retrofit all units in accordance with the
city's retrofit program with low -flow plumbing fixtures to
the satisfaction of the Community Development Director,
prior to final map approval.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa
seconded by Councilman Reiss and on the
following roll call vote:
Resolution No.
Tract 2073
Page 4
t
ti.
7036 (1991 Series)
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard, Roalman, Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day
of October , 1991.
00-�
olk or unin
A
C
lerk Pam
APPROVED:
,Ar ♦: � '' iO 6 J `D i�' O s> °f. :, nKC °ia�i uNli,v � :
a a�ee M
°t •" jY •�• u eieii
Q O
.. Q k
Y �� v • z r
Ox`% r�t0 rq• y e i
rr� raor�l fr O) t
S r CJ ea d V N. Moo' O 3
0 >
Rm` o+ / / r L +i
/ / 1].20 51 !� N �• ���/ Oyj O I U�ayL
3. ♦ %. `r
76 4.41 0
qOj 2 •o, � O� e• '� �
°
4`•Ot �jS
R-2 J 30 Fb r�
-
x"?r-
O
O 0
\\ ,&t Z
•vr i O
\ V r2 A O
b-
Mid '
i
y
� GQ �ta
♦ �,.
3 '• \
2,
/ Y V
i
��
C��� �
!,:SOLUTION NO. 7035 (1991 SER:..�S)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING AN EXCEPTION TO GRADING ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS
FOR A HOUSE AND DRIVEWAY AT 2246 SANTA YNEZ AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the testimony and statements of the
applicant, and other interested parties, and the records of the Planning Commission hearing
and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council resolves to approve the requested
exception and authorize. grading of 78% of the net site area at 2246 Santa Ynez Avenue,
based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
SECTION'l. Findings
1. The exception granted is subject to conditions which insure that it does not constitute
a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the
same vicinity.
2. Because of special circumstances applying to the subject property, notably the
nonconforming lot size and prior grading adjacent to the site to accommodate
construction of Santa Ynez Avenue, the strict literal application of the grading
limitations would deprive the subject property, of privileges enjoyed by other
properties in the vicinity.
3. Under the particular circumstances of this case, the proposed grading is consistent
with the purposes of the Grading Ordinance as set out in Section 15.44.020 of those
regulations.
4. The proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review
requirements.
SECTION 2. Conditions
1. Grading shall be in substantial conformance with the submitted grading plan; to the
approval of the Community Development Director.
2. Grading shall comply with all the requirements of Use Permit A 61 -91 and the
provisions of the Grading Ordinance, to the approval of the Community
Development Director and the Chief Building Official.
On motion of Councilman Roalman , seconded by Councilwoman
Rapp a , and, on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Reiss, Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Finard
ABSENT: None
F:=11W
Resolution No. 7035 �-` (1991 Series)
2246 Santa Ynez Avenue
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this I s t day of o c t o b e.r ._
1991.
ATTEST:
CiV Clerk Pam 6 g e s
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
rector
ayor Ron Dunin
Ll
a
�1 �I
RESOLUTION NO. 7034 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON PORTIONS OF
MUTSUHITO AND FREDERICK AVENUES BETWEEN VICTORIA AVENUE AND
THE FORMER PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. It is the intention of the City of San Luis Obispo to abandon
unimproved portions of Mutsuhito and Frederick Avenues between Victoria Avenue and
the former Pacific Coast Railroad right -of -way, as shown on the map marked Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by such reference, pursuant to Section 8300 et.
seq. of the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 2. Copies of the map showing the particulars of the proposed
abandonments are also on file in the office of the City Clerk, at 990 Palm Street.
SECTION 3. Tuesday, October -29,' 1991, in ;the Council Chamber of the City
Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California is the time and place set for hearing
all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed abandonment, which time is not
less than fifteen (15) days from the passage of this resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolution, together with the ayes and noes, shall be published
once in full at least ten (10) days before the public hearing on the proposed street
abandonments, in the Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this
city.
SECTION 5. The City Engineer shall post at least three (3) notices of the
proposed abandonments in prominent locations near the portion of the street to be
abandoned at least fourteen (14) days before the date set for the hearing in accordance
with Section 8322 of the Streets and Highways Code.
. R -7034
Council Resolution No. 7034 (1991 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 6. The City Engineer shall notify utility companies affected- by the
proposed abandonments at least ten (10) days after adoption of the Resolution of
Intention in accordance with Section 8347 of the Streets and Highways Code.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa , seconded by
Councilman Roalman , and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, Pinard., Reiss, Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this
day of octobet , 1991.
ATTES
Pam Voges, Ci lerk
U
I s t
Council Resolution No. 7034 (1991 Series)
Page 3
APPROVED:
N /_ �,A
Ir, 51 re �
Community DeveWment Director
-'Public W ks Duector
1
�
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
No.
proved p
and Fre
twean i
the form
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, road rig
SS. on the n
"A ', ffitacfied -here o an -
County of San Luis Obispo corporated herein by such
reference, pursuant to Sec -
tion 8300 et seq. of the i
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the Streets and Highways Code.
- SECTION 2 Copies of the '.
map showing the particulars
-
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not of the' proposed abandon -
ments are also on file in the
office of the City Clerk, at 990
Palm Street
interested in the above - entitled _ftA:k(_ - - -_ --_+_
i.
I am now, and at all times embraced j .. �;� .:
J
in the publication herein mention was, the principal clerk _ ...:'
of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO
_ I
COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general
fu w
I -- -!
circulation, printed and published daily, Sundays ex-
VICINITY MAP YIIA bL
- IYO9C WmYAtpi�ytn<
cepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above SECTION 3. Tuesday, Octo- ,
t ber 29, 1991, in the Council
named county and state; that _t.(t!i 1CX'i Chamber of the City Hall, 990
Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
Califorrfla is, the time and
Ij place set for hearing all per-
sons interested in or object-
ing to the proposed abandon-
ment, which time Is riot less
than fifteen (15) days from the
passage of this resolution..
at which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy, was SECTION 4. This resolu-
tion, together with the ayes J
published in the above -named newspaper and not in any and noes, shall.be published
once in full at least ten (10) i
supplement thereof — on the following dates, to -wit: days before the public hear-
ing on the proposed street j
I abandonments; in the Tele-
�C)/ ,'",a 1 gram- Tribune, a newspaper
I' published and circulated. in
this city.
I SECTION S. The City Engi-
neer shall post at least three
(3) notices of the proposed
abandonments in prominent
locations near the portion of
that said newspaper was duly and regularly scertained i the street to be abandoned at
y least fourteen (14) days be.
and established a newspaper of general circulation by ! fore the date set for the
I hearing in accordance with
Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo L section 8322 of the Streets
,I and Highways Code.
County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139 SECTION 6.'The City Engt-
neer shall notify utility comps -
under the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the nies affected by the proposed
Government Code of the State of California. RESOLUTION NO. 7034 - abandonments at least ten
(1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF (10) days after adoption of the
' Resolution of Intention in
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the INTENTION TO ABANDON accordance with Section 8347
PORTIONS OF MUTSUHITO of the Streets and Highways
foregoing is true and correct. 'AND FREDERICK AVENUES Code.
BETWEEN VICTORIA On motion of Counciiwom- I
j AVENUE AND THE FORMER an Rappa, seconded by Coun- ,
PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD oilman Roalman; and on the
RIGHT -OF -WAY. following roll call vote: f
BE IT RESOLVED by the AYES: Councilmembers
Council of the City of San Luis Rappa, Roalman, Pinard,
Obispo asfollows: , Reiss, Mayor Dunin
SECTION 1. It is the i"nten- `NOES: None _
q tion of the City of San Luis ABSENT: None
Date !I)/ ICI 19 - I'i� I Obispo to abandon unim The foregoing resolution was
x
c�
co
a
i to
O d CD
�i
<�
ft
go
c
tr
s
co
0
f1
O
e
J�
1
N O
(D
o Z
c
O
W
.0,
R �
RESOLUTION NO. 7033 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
DESIGNATING CITY PARTICIPATION IN
NATIONAL ENERGY AWARENESS MONTH
WHEREAS, October has been designated National Energy Awareness
Month by the Department of Energy, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo recognizes the importance
of appropriate and efficient.use of energy resources, and
WHEREAS, the City has an active and effective energy management
program, and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to encourage greater awareness of wise
energy use in City facilities and the community in general.
BE IT RESOLVED by the San Luis Obispo City Council as follows:
1. The City of San Luis Obispo does hereby announce its
participation in National Energy Awareness Month, October 1991.
On motion of Counrilmember Rapp seconded by Councilmember.
Roalman
, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this lst day
of October , 1991.
MAYRR RON =IN
Att st:
CIT CLERK PAMELA O ES
APPR V
it min*s ative Officer
s
Public Works Director energrres/Cfr:32
t/At or y
R -7033
WWI
RESOLUTION NO. 7032 (1991 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
LUIS OBISPO APPROVING TENT PERMrr 914
WHEREAS, -the Chamber of Commerce applied to the City for authorization on to
erect a tent on city-owned property at Mission Plata on September 21, 1091; said tent to
be used for the "SLO EXPO" event, Which. would be open to the public; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 1991, 99 1., the Council conducted 'a hearing to consider
the Tent Permit Application 91-1, as provided in Section 15.24.050 of the -Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approves the
Tent Permit Application based on the following.findings:
SECTION 1. Findings:
L Occupancy of the tent structure for assembly purposes Will not constitute a fire
hazard, if conducted in accordance with all provisions of the city's Fire Prevention
Code.
2. The proposed tent will not be detrimental to public safety, interest, or welfare.
SECTION 2. Conditions:
1 Tent may be erected on September 20, 1091, And shall be removed by September
229 1991. .
2. Applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Uniform Fire Code.
On motion of Councilwoman Rapp?:-- seconded; by Mayor
Du in and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilwoman Rappa, Mayor Dunin, Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss & Roalman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R-7032
Resolution No. 7032 (1991 Series)
Tent Permit 91 -1
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of September , 1991.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Pam o es
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
or
—NI%, –1
ayor Ron Dunin
r ;
Resolution No. 7032 (1991 Series)
Tent Permit 91 -1
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of September , 1991.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Pam o es
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
or
—NI%, –1
ayor Ron Dunin
/1F
J i
uJ
OP
O
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7031 (1991 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP FOR TRACT 2066, CREATING A 85 -UNIT
RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 843 MUTSUHITO AVENUE.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. VESTING TENTATIVE MAP. That this Council; after consideration
of public testimony, Vesting Tentative Map 2066 and the sub divider's supporting
information, the Planning Commission's recommendation, and the Community
Development Director's recommendations and reports thereon, hereby approves Vesting
Tentative Map 2066 creating a 85 -unit, planned development residential condominium
project, as shown in Exhibit "A" attached, with the :following findings and subdivision
exceptions, and subject to the following conditions:
Findings
1 The. of the subdivision is consistent with the general plan, subdivision and
ni
zong regulations. -
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in
an R -3 -PD zone.
3. The design of the tentative map and the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause serious health problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially
and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their;, habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with
easements for access through (or use of property within) the proposed subdivision.
5. The proposed subdivision has been evaluated. under the California Environmental
Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines (Existing Facilities, Section.
15301(0)), and the City Council hereby concurs with the Community Development
Director's negative declaration, subject to the following mitigation measures (note:
* asterisk refers to mitigation measures modified or added by the Planning
Commission):
R -7031
Council Resolution No. 7031 1991 Series)
Page 2
Land Use
A. Developer shall provide a minimum sideyard setback of 16 feet for unit 80,
With an architecturally compatible fence or wall, and a 10 -foot wide
landscaped planter for visual screening and physical separation.
*B. Developer shall provide a minimum building setback of 20 feet for unit 31,
and provide a noise attenuation wall along the northeast property line of
Lot 89 to protect residential uses from vehicle traffic and loading noise.
The noise wall shall be architecturally integrated with the project using
landscaping and architectural detail, to the approval of the Architectural
Review Commission.
C: Residential units with wall openings facing the C -S zone shall incorporate
construction measures to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dBA
(Ldn), to the approval of the Chief Building Official. An acoustic engineer
shall recommend appropriate design measures for the units so that the 45
dBa sound level is not exceeded, and these measures shall be incorporated
in the building plans. Such measures may include, but are not limited to
double glazing, reduced window area, enclosed outdoor patios, and special
wall assemblies..
*D. A declaration to buyer shall be included in California Department of Real
Estate documents prepared for prospective buyers. The declaration shall
advise buyers that project is located adjacent to manufacturing and service -
commercial uses, and a homeless shelter. Industrial, service- commercial,
and shelter related activities may occur in the area, including commercial
truck traffic on Victoria Avenue.
Traf'f'ic and Circulation
Developer shall:
E. Contribute toward the cost of installing a signal at the Lawrence
Drive /Broad Street intersection, prior., to construction permit issuance.
Contribution amount shall be calculated,by the City Engineer, and shall be
based on the project's proportionate share of the total traffic increase
(ADT) on Broad Street from Villa Rosa, OSH, and Stoneridge II, not to
exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the signal project.
F. Revise project design to provide a public street connection between
Lawrence Drive and Mutsuhito Avenue via Victoria Avenue. Developer
shall improve Victoria Avenue to city standards..
G. Contribute toward the cost of installing a second eastbound left -turn lane
from Broad Street onto Orcutt Road, prior to construction permit issuance.
�17
Council Resolution No. 7031 (1991 Series)
Page 3
Contribution shall be calculated by the City Engineer, and shall be based
on the project's proportionate share of the total traffic volume (ADT) on
Orcutt road.
H. Contribute toward the cost of widening Orcutt Road to four lanes east of
Broad Street, prior to construction permit issuance. Contribution shall be
calculated by the City Engineer, and ; shall be based on the project's
proportionate share of the total traffic volume (ADT) on Orcutt Road.
I. Contribute toward the cost of installing a grade separation at Orcutt Road
and the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, prior to construction permit
issuance. Contribution shall be calculated by the City Engineer, and shall
be based on the project's proportionate share of the total traffic volume
(ADT) on Orcutt Road.
J. Revise the Orcutt Road driveway exit to restrict access to right -tam in and
right -turn out only, to the approval of the City Engineer.
Air Quality
Developer shall:
K Incorporate bike and pedestrian trails into the project design to provide the
opportunity to connect with a planned citywide bike trail in or along the
Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, near the northeast comer of the site.
*L. Grant irrevocable offer for public pedestrian and bicycle access easements
from Broad Street to the future connection point at the site's northeast
comer and along the former Pacific Coast. Railroad right -of -way, and install
footpath and bikeway improvements as approved by the Architectural
Review Commission.
A Contribute toward cost of installing a transit facility on the east side of
Broad Street between Lawrence Drive and Orcutt Road Costs shall
include construction of a standard bus turnout, transit shelter, bus sign, trash
receptacle, and installation of public -art and appropriate landscaping.
Contribution amount shall be calculated by the City Engineer, and shall be
based on the project's proportionate share of the total traffic increase
(ADT) on Broad Street from OSH, Villa Rosa, and Stoneridge II, not to
exceed 25 percent of the improvement's total cost..
N. Follow Air Pollution Control District guidelines to reduce fugitive dust
emissions during grading and site preparation, and exhaust emissions from
construction equipment. Prior to construction permit issuance, the
developer shall submit a plan describing measures to be taken during
construction to reduce emissions, to the approval of the Community
Council Resolution No. 7031 (1991 Series)
Page 4
Development Director.,
Plant Life
"O. Site design shall be modified where feasible to preserve Eucalyptus trees,
to the approval of the City Arborist and the Community Development
Director. Where preservation is not feasible, the trees to be removed shall
be replaced on a two for one basis. with 15 -gallon sized trees of a
comparable ultimate size and longevity.
Historic Resources
P. A qualified archaeologist will instruct the project's construction contractors
in how to recognize resources that my be encountered. If excavations
encounter archaeological resources; construction activities which -may affect
them shall cease. The Community Development Director shall be notified
of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be
recorded by a qualified archaeologist. Disposition of artifacts shall comply
with state and federal laws. A note concerning this requirement shall be
included on the grading and construction plans for the project.
Q. Brick work shall be incorporated into the development of the site to recall
the historic use of the site.
R. The historic significance of the site shall be documented through the use
of a plaque, photographs and samples of the brick work incorporated into
a marker or kiosk on the project site for public display, possibly in
cooperation with the adjacent Orchard Supply Hardware project.
General
S. If the . Community Development Director determines that the above
mitigation measures are either infeasible or ineffective, the Director may
modify the measures or add additional measures to better achieve the intent
of the original mitigation.
Subdivision Exceptions
The proposed exceptions to Subdivision Regulations to allow:.
A. Reduced street widths from 40 feet to 28 feet on Victoria Avenue, from 40 feet
to 34 feet on Lawrence Drive, and from 40 feet to two 17 -foot travel lanes on
Mutsuhito Avenue;
Council Resolution No. 1031 (1991 Series)
Page 5
B. Reduced street yards from 15 feet to 10 feet for units 43; 67, 68, 69, 79, 84, and
85; and from 15 feet to 7 feet for unit 44.
are hereby approved with the following findings:
A. The cost to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance with the regulations
is not the sole reason for granting the modifications.
B. The modifications will not be Aetrimental to the public health; safety, or
welfare, or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity.
s
C. Granting the modifications is in accord with the intent and purpose of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations, and is consistent.with the general plan
and with all applicable specific plans or, other plans of the city.
Conditions
1. Subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for review, approval and
recordation.
2. Subdivider shall provide individual utilities to each unit (telephone, electric, gas,
water, and cable TV) to the satisfaction of the public utility agencies and the City
Engineer. All new utilities shall be placed. underground.. Water meters shall
clustered in the public sidewalk to the approval of the City Engineer
3. Final map shall note a blanket easement over the common lot area, except under
the structures, for access to, installation and maintenance of underground public
utilities serving the site, to the approval of the; City Engineer and affected utility
companies.
4. Final map shall show a 6 -foot public utilities easement and -10 -foot wide street tree
easement along the project's public street frontages.
5. All on -site driveways, nonstructural parking improvements and utilities shall be
installed as subdivision improvements.
6. Subdivider shall prepare covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC &R's) to be
approved by the City Attorney and Community Development Director prior to
final map approval.. CC&R's shall include the following provisions:
a Creation of a homeowners' association to enforce the CC &R's and provide
for professional, perpetual maintenance of all common area including
private driveways, sewer mains, drainage; parking lot areas, walls and fences,
lighting, recreation facilities, and landscaping in a first class condition
b. Grant to the city the right to maintain', common area if the homeowners'
Council Resolution No. 1031 (1991 Series)'
Page 6
association fails to perform, and to assess the homeowners' association for
expenses incurred, and the right of the city to inspect the site at mutually
agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's and.final map are being made.
C. No parking except in approved, . designated spaces.
d. Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles on a complaint basis which
are parked in unauthorized places.
e. Probibition of storage or other uses which would conflict with the use of
garages for parking purposes.
L No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motorhomes, or- trailers. nor long=
term storage of inoperable vehicles.
g. No outdoor storage by individual units except in designated storage areas.
h. No change in city- required provisions of the CC &R's without prior City
Council approval.
i. Homeowners' association shall file with the City Clerk the names and
addresses of all officers of the homeowners' association within 15 days of
any change in officers of the association
j. Provision of appropriate "no parking "-signs and red- curbing along interior
roadways as required by the City Fire Department.
;k. CC & Rs shall not prohibit outdoors clothes drying.
7. The portion of this site that participated in t the McMillan Sewer . Assessment
District may-sewer to the Orcutt Road sewer main (lots 1 .through 31). The
remaining lots 32 through 85 did not. participate in said assessment district and
must sewer to the Broad Street sewer main. If gravity sewering lots 45 through
55 to Broad Street is not feasible, those lots may be sewered to Orcutt Road
provided all appropriate lift station fees are' paid, as determined by the City
Engineer.
8. The public water mains serving this site shall loop from the water main in Orcutt
Road to the water main in Broad Street via the on -site driveway paralleling the
easterly and northerly boundaries and connecting said streets.
A second internally looped public water main may be constructed within the
driveway lying southerly and southwesterly ; of the four, most northeasterly,
buildings. All water meters shall be grouped. in manifolds containing no more
than 6 meters each, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Council Resolution No. 7031 (1991 Series)
Page 7
All final grades and alignments of all public mains shall be subject to adjustments
as determined by and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Utilities
Engineer.
9. An easement for public water facilities shall be' granted to the City and shown on
the Final Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Utilities Engineer. The
easement shall exempt the City from all responsibilities for the replacement of any
special pavements (other than asphalt concrete).
10. The subdivider shall pay all applicable water and sewer and park in -lieu fees at
time of close of buyer escrow -and prior to final occupancy release of the first unit
by City.
11. Subdivider shall dedicate sufficient additional right -of -way at the , easterly end of
Lawrence Drive to provide for a vehicle turnaround and landscaped_ median, to
the approval of the City Engineer.
12. Lawrence Drive, Mutsuhito Avenue, and Victoria Avenue shall be improved to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, based on the following standards;_
A. The subdivider shall improve Lawrence; Dr. with a 4' detached sidewalk,
landscaped parkway, curb and gutter on the southerly side, '34' wide street
pavement (T.I. = 8.0) and A/C curb along the northerly .side of the street.
The proposed sidewalk may meander, but shall be at least 6' wide wherever
connected to the curb, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The
subdivider shall install a retaining wall and erosion control landscaping and
irrigation along the northerly side of Lawrence Drive, to the approval of
the City Engineer and the Community Development Director.
B. Mutsuhito Avenue shall be improved with a 4' detached sidewalk and
landscape parkway along both sides,. a raised median.island, and..full -width
street pavement (T.I. = 8.0).. The median . island and landscape parkways
proposed in Mutsuhito Ave.. shall be.maintained by the Homeowner's
Association. The width of the median 'island may require adjustment to
accommodate access requirements needed by the Fire Department (min. 20'
wide travel lane) and future truck traffic.
*C. Victoria Avenue shall be improved with 4' detached sidewalk and 6'
landscaped parkway along the east side, with a 28' street paveout, and a 6"
concrete curb or AC. berm and landscaping along the west side.
D. Interior streets shall be constructed using a T.I. of 5.5.
13. Final map shall note that all improvements within the Southern California Gas
Company easement shall be subject to approval by said gas, company.
Council Resolution No. 7031
(091 Series)
Page 8
14. All on -site grading shall be designed so as not to damage the off -site trees along
the easterly property line. All on -site trees shall be labeled; and trees to be
preserved shall be protected during construction, to the approval of the City
Arborist. Subdivider shall submit a tree protection agreement and acceptable
surety to guarantee protection and /or replacement of trees to be preserved, to the
approval of the Community Development Director.
15. The subdivider shall submit to the City Engineer a hydrology report, prepared by
a registered civil engineer, for the proposed site .development.
16: All boundary monuments, lot comers and centerline intersections, curb return
points, and other survey data shall be tied to the City's control network. At least
two control points shall be used and.. a tabulation of the coordinates shall be
submitted with the final map or parcel map. A 5 -1/4" diameter: computer floppy
disk, containing the appropriate data for use in autocad for Geographic
Information System (GIS) purposes, is also required to be submitted to the City
Engineer.
17. Subdivider shall install street trees along the Broad Street, Lawrence Drive,
Victoria Avenue and Mutsuhito Avenue street frontages, to city standards, and to
the satisfaction of the City Arborist and Architectural Review Commission.
18. Subdivider shall submit a common driveway agreement and easement for lots 88
and 89 to the Community Development Director for approval and recordation
19. All grading shall comply with the recommendations contained in the soils report
for the proposed site development.
20. All units shall be numbered in accordance with .an . addressing plan approved by
the Community Development Department.
21. Subdivider shall install a unit identification plan with directory at-each of the
project entrances to the approval of the Community Development Director.
22. Subdivider shall install street lighting as determined by the City Engineer per City
and Pacific Gas and Electric standards.
23. Project construction activity, including grading'; operations, shall be limited to the
weekday hours from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
24. Subdivider shall submit a dust management plan to limit dust generation from
construction activities on the site and from construction vehicles transporting soil
to and from the site to the approval of the Community Development Director and
the Chief Building Official.
Council Resolution No: 7031 (1991 Series)
Page 9
25. In lieu of solar water heating as required by the Condominium Regulations, the
developer may provide other energy- saving features, to the approval of the
Community Development Director. Such features shall, as a minimum, provide
equivalent long -term ' energy savings when, compared to solar water heating
(including installation and life -cycle operation costs), and shall consist of
permanent features which are integral'to the :unit, such as dual glazing, thicker
Wall or _roof insulation, or energy - saving space heating. If solar water heating is
not installed, each unit shall be- plumbed to accommodate the future installation
of solar water heating, including piping and water storage location (tank need not
be installed).
On motion of councilwoman.Rappa _ _ seconded by
Councilman Reiss , and on'the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Counciimember Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this .__ ' ".17 th
day of September 1 .1991.
ATTEST:
Council Resolution No. 7031(1991 Series)
Page 10
APPROVED:
•.:
'Public Wo D ector
7
r
f
C
C
,J
s;I
•ti7�t'
� A
`II / �i •`Jr .y
e
W I t
r 71 .F �• ice,
J
/
iz
W
N
a< °9
< 39i!
s
Np
1
i
�
to
;t
ft• � i
ear it;� =!t
<
9
Af t S
j F
� Q 1l!:.lSlEji i
�o
f
►' ; , y;ad J
-a ) �y/,
3•
tS°
t J iiii,
tA<
j
^N;
`6
�
_
t
11{11
i
ty
0
Ijl1J;.•.... (!!J1
p
m
,•
O
F n
•a:
..
I
L �
V
13• • i'
I t
11 I W
I
3
. j4
0
W
i �
•{ .�
W
N
c
i
.
tSI
Yri
N
!kl
I�
�
J�
x t „i 21
f II r— '_
I�FI
- -Try —•
,J
s;I
•ti7�t'
� A
`II / �i •`Jr .y
e
W I t
r 71 .F �• ice,
J
/
iz
W
N
a< °9
< 39i!
s
Np
1
i
�
to
;t
ft• � i
ear it;� =!t
I
Ytj I:f
IE:
1., Illtll • 1
y j31
�1 pajjl i:A
j F
� Q 1l!:.lSlEji i
�o
f
►' ; , y;ad J
-a ) �y/,
,J
s;I
•ti7�t'
� A
`II / �i •`Jr .y
e
W I t
r 71 .F �• ice,
J
/
iz
W
N
a< °9
< 39i!
s
Np
1
i
S¢
�
a i2• I
;t
ft• � i
I
Ytj I:f
IE:
1., Illtll • 1
y j31
�1 pajjl i:A
aSl i
1
3•
S¢
I t—
3F}
Iti:ll:l
I!illll
EX HIBIT
1., Illtll • 1
tS°
t J iiii,
tA<
j
^N;
`6
�
_
t
11{11
ty
Ijl1J;.•.... (!!J1
p
,•
�nM3nrsnxnvjnyf
F n
•a:
..
I
L �
V
13• • i'
I t
11 I W
I
3
. j4
a
---------
.
tSI
lit' ary ------
!kl
I�
�
x t „i 21
f II r— '_
I�FI
- -Try —•
_••II
, 1 3nItl0 37N3tlMV1 , •
I t—
3F}
Iti:ll:l
I!illll
EX HIBIT
1., Illtll • 1
tS°
t J iiii,
tA<
t
�
IJ �
t
11{11
ty
Ijl1J;.•.... (!!J1
p
I t—
3F}
Iti:ll:l
I!illll
EX HIBIT
J
RESOLUTION NO. 7030 (1991 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FEES FOR PLANNING,
BUILDING & SAFETY, AND ENGINEERING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo's Municipal Code authorizes the
establishment of various fees for delivery of municipal services; and
WHEREAS, the cost of providing planning, building & safety, and engineering
services have been comprehensively reviewed by Vertex Cost Systems in 1988; and
WHEREAS, the proposed fees for development review services are consistent with
the User Fee Cost Recovery Policy adopted by the City Council in the 1991 -93 Financial
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the
adoption of the proposed development review fees is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15273 of the State CEQA
Guidelines as the purpose of these charges is to meet operating expenses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing concerning these fee
adjustments on September 17, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby establishes
development review fee schedules for Planning, Building & Safety, and Engineering services,
as provided in Exhibits A, B, and C attached hereto to be effective November 16, 1991.
SECTION 2. Any project owned or actively managed by the San Luis Obispo
Housing Authority shall be exempt from all development review fees.
SECTION 3. Consistent with current cost recovery policies, all development review
fees shall be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, any flat fees in
Exhibits A, B, and C should be adjusted annually on November 1st of each year by changes
in the Consumer Price Index [all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) for the Los Angeles - Long
Beach - Anaheim area] for the most recent period that this information is available prior
to November 1st; and a comprehensive analysis of development review fees similar to that
prepared by Vertex Cost Systems in 1988 shall be made at least every two years.
SECTION 4. To ensure cost recovery for services not specifically referenced in
Exhibits A, B, and C for supplemental or additional services as may be required, charges
u_7nzn
Resolution No. 7030 (l� Series)
Page Two
shall be based on actual labor, material, equipment, and indirect costs. In determining
labor costs, hourly billing rates shall be established by the Director of Finance which
appropriately reflect salary, benefit, and overhead costs. In determining equipment usage
costs, the equipment rental schedule developed by the California Department of
Transportation (CALTRANS) or similar authoritative source for equipment costs shall be
used. For services provided by the City through private contract not specifically referenced
in this document, the contract price plus 10% for City contract administration shall be used
in establishing the service charge.
SECTION 5. If any charge set forth in this resolution or the application thereof to
any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other
charge or application thereof, and to this end the charges established in this Resolution are
declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. Refunds of any portion of fees for withdrawn or partially completed
projects shall be determined by the Director of Community Development, Building Official,
City Engineer, or Director of Public Works based on code requirements and /or their
appraisal of the cost of staff work performed.
SECTION 7. Effective November 16, 1991, Resolutions No. 5009 (1983 Series), No.
5908 (1986 Series), No. 5953 (1986 Series), and No. 6486 (1988 Series) are hereby rescinded
along with all other fee schedules in conflict herewith.
Upon motion Of Councilman Roalman- seconded by Councilwoman Rappaand on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa and Pinard
NOES: Councilmember Reiss and Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 17th day of September , 1991.
e on Dumn
A E :.
PamVVoges, City rk
Resolution No. 7030 Q-Cl Series) �.
Page Three
APPROVED:
„
2
of Public Works
Director of Comkujity Development
Director of Finance
ExhlbLiL I Afts"
BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE
All construction permit fees are subject to a minimum of $30.00. Whenever work is started
without. first obtaining a permit, an investigation fee equal to the amount of the permit fee
required, may be collected.
Plan Review Fees
When a plan or other data are required to be submitted by Section 302(b) of the Uniform
Administrative Code, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans,
specifications or other data for review. Said plan review fee for buildings or structures shall
be 65 percent of the total of all building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical permit fees.
The plan review fees specified in this subsection are separate fees from the permit fees
specified in Section 304(b) and are in addition to the permit fees.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional. plan review prior to
the issuance of a permit; an additional plan review fee may be charged at an hourly rate
rate of $50.00 with a minimum charge of one -half hour.
Permit Fees - General Application
For newly constructed buildings and additions, a single all inclusive combination permit
will be issued. The fees therefor shall be determined by increasing the building permit
fee by 40 %, for the cost of electrical, mechanical, and'plumbing inspection of the building.
A. . - BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Building permit fees shall be as in Table 3 -A of the Uniform Administrative Code.
Total Valuation Fee
1. $1 to $500.00 $15.00
2. $501.00 to $2,000.00 $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.00 for
each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof,
to and including $2,000.00
3. $2,0001.00 to $25,000.00
4. $25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00
for each additional $1,000.00.or fraction
thereof, to and including $25,000.00
$252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $6.50
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $50,000.00
5. $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $100,000.00
6. $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $500,000.00
7. $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
8. $1,000,001.00 and Up $3539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus
$2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or
fraction thereof
9. Energy Consumption Compliance Surcharge:
A surcharge of 10% shall be added to the permit fees for projects required
to comply with State of California Energy Conservation Standards.
10. Accessibility Compliance Surcharge:
A surcharge of 6.5% shall be added to the permit fees for projects required
to comply with State of California Accessibility Standards.
11. Other Inspections and Fees:
a. Inspections outside of normal business hours $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge two hours)
b. Reinspection fees assessed under provision of
Section 305(g) (minimum charge - one hour) $50.00 per hour
C. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one -half hour)
d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans (minimum charge - one -half hour) $50.00 per hour
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
Electrical Permit Fees shall be as in Table 3 -13 of the Uniform Administrative Code.
1. System Fee Schedule:
a. Private Swimming Pools
For new private, residential, in- ground, swimming pools for single
familyand multifamily occupancies including a complete system of
necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater
lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly
related to the operation of a swimming pool, each $30.00
For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirlpools, spas and
alterations to existing swimming pools, use the Unit Fee Schedule.
b. Carnivals and Circuses
Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions
utilizingtransportable -type rides, booths, displays and attractions.For
electric generators and electrically driven rides, each $15.00
For mechanically driven rides and walk - through attractions or displays
having electric lighting, each $ 4.50
For a system of area and booth lighting, each $ 4.50
For permanently installed, rides, booths, displays, and attractions, use
the Unit Fee Schedule.
C. Temporary Power Service
For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or
pedestal- mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each $15.00
For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and
receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas
tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each $ 7.50
2. Unit Fee Schedule (In addition to Permit Issuance Fees above)
a. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets
For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current issused
or controlled, except services, feeders and meters.
First 20, each $ .75
Additional outlets, each $ .45
Note: For multioutlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be
considered as one outlet.
b. Lighting Fixtures
For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp- holding devices.
First 20, each $ .75
Additional fixtures, each $ .45
For pole or platform- mounted lighting fixtures, each $ .75
For theatrical -type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each $ .75
C. Residential Appliances
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same,
including wall- mounted electric ovens; counter - mounted cooking tops;
electric ranges, self - contained room, console, or through -wall air
conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwasher; washing
machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor - operated
appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP)in rating, each$ 3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven appliances
having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus.
d. Nonresidential Appliances
For residential appliances and self - contained factory-wired
nonresidential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt
(KW), or kilovolt- ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and
dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated
show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines;
or other similar types of equipment, each $ 3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven appliances
having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus.
e. Power Apparatus
For motors,, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters,
capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking
or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows:
Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt - amperes (KVA),
or kilovolt - amperes- reactive (KVAR):
Up to and including 1, each
$ 3.00
Over 1 and not over 10, each
$ 7.50
Over 10 and not over 50, each
$15.00
Over 50 and not over 100, each
$30.00
Over 100, each .
$45.00
Note:
1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer,
heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used.
2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats,
relays and other directly related control equipment.
E Busways
For trolley and plub -in -type busways, each 100 feet or
fraction thereof $ 4.50
Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors
and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug -in -type busways.
No fee is required for portable tools.
C.
0
g. Signs, Outline, Lighting and Marquees
For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one
branch circuit, each $15.00
For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting
system or marquee, each $ 3.00
h. Services
For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating,
each $18.50
For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes
in rating, each $3750
For services over 600 volts or over 1000 amperes in rating, each$75.00
i. Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors
For electrical apparatus, conduits and .conductors for which a permit
is required but for which no fee is herein set forth $11.00
Note: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services,
outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other
equipment.
3. Other Inspections and Fees:
a. Inspection outside of normal business hours $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
b. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305(g) (minimum one hour) $50.00 per hour
C. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one -half hour)
d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans (minimum charge - one -half hour) $50.00 per hour
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
Mechanical Permit Fees shall be as in Table 3 -C of the Uniform Administrative
Code.
1. Unit Fee Schedule:
a. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or gravity -type
furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance,
up to and including 100,000 Btu /h $ 9:00
b. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or gravity -type
furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance
over 100,000 Btu /h $11.00
C. For the installtion or relocation of each floor furnace,
including vent $ 9.00
d. For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed
wall heater or floor - mounted unit heater $ 9.00
e. For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent
installed and not included in an appliance permit $4.50
L For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance,
refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating,
cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation
of controls regulated by this code $ 9.00
g. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and
including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including
100,000 Btu /h $ 9.00
h. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over
three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption
system over 100,000 Btu /h to and including 500,000 Btu /h $16.50 j
i. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over
15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption
system over 500,000 Btu /h to and including 1,000,000 Btu /h
$22.50
j. For the installation or relocation of each 'boiler or-:compressor over
30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption
system over 1,000,000 Btu /h to and including 1,750,000 Btu /h$3350
k. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over
50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu /h
$56.00
1. For each air - handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per
minute, including ducts attached thereto $ 6.50
Note: This fee shall not apply to an air - handling unit which is a
portion of a factory- assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative
cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in
this code.
10
M. For each air- handling unit over 10,000 cfm $11.00
n. For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $ 6.50
o. For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $ 4.50
P. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or
air - conditioning system authorized by a permit $ 650
q. For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical
exhaust, including the ducts for.such hood $ 6.50
r. For the installation or relocation of each domestic -type
incinerator $11.00
S. For the installation or relocation of-each commercial or industrial -
type incinerator $45.00
t. For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but
not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is
listed in this code $ 650
2. Other Inspections and Fees:
a. Inspections outside or normal business hours $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
b. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305(g) (minimum charge - one hour) $50.00 per hour
C. Inspections for which no fee. is specifically indicated - $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one -half hour)
d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to
approve plans (minimum charge one -half hour) $50.00 per hour
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Plumbing Permit Fees shall be as in Table 3 -D of the Uniform Administrative Code.
1. Unit Fee Schedule:
a. For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap
(including water, drainage piping, and backflow protection
therefor) $ 6.00
0
2.
b. For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer.. $15.00
C. Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) $ 6.00
d. For each cesspool (where permitted) $22.50
e. For each private sewage disposal system $45.00
f. For each water heater and /or vent $ 7.50
g. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap
and vent, excepting kitchen -type grease interceptors functioning as
fixture traps $12.00
h. For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and /or water -
treating equipment, each $ 3.00
L For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture$ 3.00
�. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow
protection devices therefor $ 9.00
k. For atmospheric -type vacuum breakers not included in Item 2:
1 to 5 $ 7.50
over 5, each $ 1.50
1. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric -type
vacuum breakers:
2 inches and smaller $ 7.50
over 2 inches $15.00
M. For each gas piping system of one to four outlets $ 3.00
M For each gas piping system of five or more outlets, per outlet$ .75
Other Inspections and Fees:
a. Inspections outside or normal business hours $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
b. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305(g) (minimum charge one hour) $50.00 per hour
C. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans (minimum charge - one -half hour) $50.00 per hour
E.
F
G
FEES FOR PERMIT TO MOVE A BUILDING
1. For issuance of each permit to move a building
2. Inspection of a building within the City
(minimum charge one hour)
3. Inspection of a building outside the City
(minimum charge - two hours)
DEMOLITION PERMIT FEES
1. Permit Issuance
When pedestrian protection is required
When no pedestrian protection is required
GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES
f
$50.00
$50.00 per hour
$50.00 per hour
$100.00
$ 50.00
Grading plan review fees shall be as in Table 3 -G of the Uniform Administrative
Code.
1. 50 cubic yards or less No Fee
2. 51 to 100 cubic yards $15.00
3. 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $2250
4. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $30.00
5. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards -.$30.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus
$15.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof..
6. 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards - $165.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards,
plus $9.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
7. 200,001 cubic yards or more - $255.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards, plus
$4.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
8. Other Fees:
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisionsto approved
plans (minimum charge - one -half hour) $50.00 per hour
H.
GRADING PERMIT FEES (1)
Grading permit fees shall be as in Table 3 -H of the Uniform Administrative Code.
1. 50 cubic yards or less $15.00
2. 51 to 100 cubic yards $22.50
3. 101 to 1,000 cubic yards - $22:50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for
each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof
4. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards - $117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.00
for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
5. 10,001 to 100;000 cubic yards - $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus
$40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
6. 100,001 cubic yards or more - $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus
$2250 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof
(1) The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under
a valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original
permit and the fee shown for the entire poject.
7. Other Inspection Fees:
a. Inspections outside of normal business hours $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
b. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305(g) (minimum charge - one hour) $50.00 per hour
C. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $50.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one -half hour)
L MICROFILM FEE
Fee assessed with permit to defray the cost of microfilming construction documents
filed with permit $ 2:00 /plan pag5
- MULL
PLANNING SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Proposed Fee
ZONING SERVICES
Sidewalk Sales Permit
$
50.00
Home Occupation Permit
$
50.00
School Tenant Permit
$
100.00
Administrative Use Permit
$
200.00
Planning Commission Use Permit
$
650.00
City Council Use Permit
$
650.00
Downtown Housing Conversion Permit
$
630.00
Variance
$
780.00
Planned Development Permit
30% for administrative &
Preliminary
$1,500.00
Precise
$
800.00
Precise Plan Amendment
50% of Filing Fee
Rezoning
Map Amendment
$1,030.00
Text Amendment
$
700.00
Time Extension
$
120.00
SUBDIVISION SERVICES
Lot Line Adjustment
$ 300.00
Lot Combination
$ 300.00
Minor Land Division
$ 600.00
Parcel Map (4 or less Lots)
$1,530.00
Tract Map (5 or more Lots)
$1,530.00 + $50 /Lot
Certificate of Compliance
1 to 9 Parcels
$ 250.00
10 or more Parcels
$ 300.00
Final Map Time Extensions
50% of Filing Fee
OTHER PLANNING SERVICES
Environmental Impact Determination
$ 500.00
Environmental Impact Report
Consultant Contract plus
30% for administrative &
review services
Sign Permits
Free Standing
$ 70.00
All Others
$ 50.00
Proposed Fee
Architectural Review
Signs
$ 150.00
Development Projects .
$ 630.00
Minor - Incidental
.$ 180.00
Street Name Change
$ 530.00
Street Abandonment
$ 630.00
Condominium Conversion
$ 830.00
Applicant- Requested Continuation
$ 120.00
Time Extension
$ 120.00
Plan Revisions
50% Original Filing Fee
Special Research
Actual Cost
Appeals
$ 0.00
GENERAL & SPECIFIC PLANS
Specific Plan
Initial Study Fee $1,000.00
Plan Review Fixed fee intended to fully recover City
costs per written agreement with applicant
to be executed before work is initiated
which outlines tasks, workscope, and City
and applicant responsibilities
Amendment
General Plan Amendment
Map (includes rezoning)
Text
ANNEXATIONS
Annexation
Fixed fee intended to fully recover City
costs per written agreement with applicant .
to be executed before work is initiated
which outlines tasks, workscope, and City
and applicant responsibilities
$1,130.00
$ 700.00
$1,000.00 + $100 Per Acre
over 5 Acres
NOTE: All fees include costs for applicable notification requirements to adjacent
property owners. Public Art is exempt from all fees.
MAPS AND PUBLICATIONS
The fee schedule for General Plan Elements, Other Publications, and Ordinances should
be evaluated annually, with the fee adjusted to reimburse the reproduction /printing cost
plus 30% to cover the overhead /administration costs.
Proposed Fee
DIZAO PRINTS OF MAPS
Aerial Photo only
$ 2.00
Counterbook Page
$ 1.50
Photo -Topo Combo
$ 2.75
Topo Map Only
$ 2.00
1000' City Map (3' x 3')
$ 4.00
800' City Map (42" x 42 ")
$ 5.50
500' City Map (2 pieces)
$12.00
ALL OTHER MAPS & COPIES
Blueline
$ .50 /sq. ft.
Sepia
$ 1.00 /sq. ft.
Photo Copies:
Standard or legal
$ .25 /page
11" x 17"
$ .50 /page
Microfiche Copies:
8 -1/2" x 11" (in house)
$ .25 /page
8 -1/2" x 11" (50 copies or more)
$ .50 /page
ill? x 17"
$ 1.50 /page
18" x 24"
$ 4.00 /page
minimum charges for rushes
$ 8.00
Microfiche Duplicates:
$ 1.00 /fiche
minimum charge
$ 4.00
Many of these fees are applicable to City operations other than planning, building & safety,
and engineering. Accordingly, whenever applicable, these fees shall be assessed City -wide.
ENGINEERING FEE SCHEDULE
Improvement Plan Check
Construction Inspection
Tract Map (Final)
Parcel Map (Final)
Encroachment Permits
Fee
$200.00 + 1.5%
of Construction Costs*
$500.00 + 2:5%
of Construction Costs*
$750.00 + $50.00. per Lot
$750.00
$25.00 Minimum Charge
$500.00 /year for Blanket Permit
$25.00 + $2.00 /Linear Foot for
New & Replacement Installation
$100.00 + $0.25 /Linear Foot for
Excavation
Transportation Permit $35.00
* An estimate is required from the applicant for verification of the public improvement
costs.
.�
,` `' L��` �c,
L
Resolution No. 7029 (1991 Series)
. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UPDATING THE LIST OF
CITY EMPLOYEES AND COMMISSION MEMBERS REQUIRED
TO FILE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 6881 (1990 SERIES)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Designated city employees and commission members listed on the
attached Exhibit "A" shall be required to file a Conflict of Interest Statement.(Form 730)
with the City Clerk.
SECTION 2. Resolution No. 6881 is rescinded upon adoption of this resolution.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa seconded by
Councilman Roalman , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of
September 91991
r�Lpyruveu:
A
MAYOR RON DUNIN
i NA
R -7029
DEPARTMENT POSITION TITLE
Exhibit "A"
Administrative Office:
Assistant City Administrative Officer
Transit Manager
Administrative Analyst (2)
Executive Secretary
City Attorney:
Assistant City Attorney
City Clerk's Office:
City Clerk
Community Development Dept.:
Community Development Director
Principal Planner
Senior Planner
Long Range Planner
Associate Planner(s)
Assistant Planner(s)
Chief Building Official
Plan Check Engineer
Building Inspectors)
Administrative Analyst.
Permit Coordinator
Zoning Investigations Coordinator*
Finance Department:
Revenue Manager
Support Services Manager (formerly Chief Accountant)
Accounting Manager (formerly Financial Systems Manager)
Accounting Supervisor
Customer Services Supervisor
Information Systems Coordinator **
Fire Department:
Fire Chief
Battalion Chief.(s)
Battalion Chief (Fire Marshall)
Fire Protection Engineer
Hazardous Material Inspector
Plan Check Inspector
Fire Inspector
Personnel Department:
Personnel.Director
Personnel Analyst(s)
Executive Secretary
Police Department:
Chief of Police
Police Captains)
Police Lieutenant(s)
Support Services Manager
Public Works Department:
Director of Public Works
Administrative Analyst
Projects Manager
Streets Manager
Streets Supervisors(s)
Parking Manager (formerly Parking Program Coordinator)*
Streets Project Coordinator
Parks and Buildings Manager
Parks Supervisor(s)
Public Works Inspector(s)
City Engineer
Field Engineering Assistant*
Supervising Civil Engineer(s)
Civil Engineer(s) (None at this time)
Engineering Assistant(s)
Engineering Field Supervisor
Engineering Technicians
Supervising Mechanic
Arborist
Golf Course Supervisor
Building Maintenance Supervisor
Solid Waste Coordinator (Contract position)
Parks and Building Project Assistant (Contract position) **
Energy Coordinator (Contract position) **
Recreation Department:
Director of Recreation
Utilities - Department:
Utilities Director
Utilities Engineer
Water Supply Supervisor (Whale Rock)
Water Treatment Plan Supervisor
Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor
Industrial Waste Coordinator (formerly Industrial Waste
Water Division Manager
Wastewater Division Manager
Water Distribution Supervisor
Wastewater Collection System Supervisor
Committees /Commissions:
Architectural Review Commissioners
Housing Authority Commissioners
Housing Authority Executive.Director
BIA Administrator
Inspector)*
*Or as hereafter may t_= reclassified.
* *Added this year
NOTE: Temporary positions may be required to file a Conflict of Interest
Statement upon determination by the City Attorney that the temporary position
is the function equivalent of a designated position.
City Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, City Administrative Officer, City
Attorney and City Finance Director are required to file Form 721 with. the
Secretary of State and are, therefore, not shown as designated positions by the
City.
W
L
l
0
I
RESOLUTION NO. 7028 (1991 SERIES)
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SEPTEMBER 23 - 27, 1991
AS "FREE TRANSIT WEEK"
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has long supported public
transportation and policies to help reduce traffic congestion in
the area; and
WHEREAS, it is known that there is a correlation between
traffic congestion and the amount of auto emissions; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is interested in
promoting alternate forms of transportation to reduce traffic
congestion; and
WHEREAS, the increased use of mass transportation can improve
air quality by reducing the number of automobiles on the road; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo recognizes the use of
ridesharing has the potential to reduce fuel consumption, air
pollution, traffic congestion, transportation costs and parking
needs; and
WHEREAS, the increased use of mass transportation can improve
air quality by reducing the number of automobiles on the road; and
WHEREAS, by offering "Free Transit Week" September 23 - 27,
1991, in conjunction with Regional Transit System Program, the City
hopes to call attention to the benefits of mass transportation and
to attract new riders to the bus system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby designates the week of September 23 27, 1991 as
"Free Transit Week" to encourage all residents of San Luis Obispo
R -7028
Resolution No.7028 (1991 Series)
Page 2
to consider the use of bus service that week and thereafter, and
also recognizes September 23 - 27 as "Rideshare Week ".
Upon motion of Councilwoman Rappa, seconded by Councilman
Reiss, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard,.Roalman and Mayor
Dunn
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the resolution was adopted this 17th day of September, 1991.
APPROVED:
Ave Officer
hw \ftweek
,����'
�1 )���
RESOLUTION NO. 7027(1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR UMTA SECTION 18 APPORTIONMENT GRANT
TO APPLY TO THE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
wishes:
1. To authorize the application for UMTA Section 18
Apportionment Grant for the Bus Stop Improvement Program;
2. To authorize the City Administrative Officer or his
designee to sign all documents pertinent to the application;
3. To appoint the City Administrative Officer or his
designee as the agent of the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct all
negotiations, execute, and submit all documents pursuant to the
City's Purchasing Manual. All original documents including, but
not limited to, the applications, agreements and amendements are
to be retained in the office of the City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the authorizing and
application for an UMTA Section 18 Apportionment Grant for the Bus
Stop Improvement Program is hereby approved. The City Clerk is
hereby directed to furnish and execute a copy of this resolution.
for attachment to approved application and other supporting
materials as may be required and forward to San Luis Obispo Area
Coordinating Council, County Government Center, San Luis Obispo,
CA 93408, Attention: Ron DeCarli.
R -7027
i
Resolution No. 7027 (1991 Series)
Page Two
upon motion of Councilman Reiss seconded by
Councilman Roalman and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Roalman, Rappa, Pinard and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 3rd day of September_ -,
1991..
ATTEST:
Pam Vo es, City C rk
APPROVED:
ty
Of f icer
HW \umta.rpt
0
0
RESOLUTION NO. 7026 (1991 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR AN UMTA SECTION 18 DISCRETIONARY
GRANT TO PURCHASE ONE TRANSIT COACH
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo;
Section 1: To authorize the application for an UMTA Section
18 Grant to purchase one transit coach.
Section 2: To authorize the City Administrative Officer or
his designee to sign all documents pertinent to the application.
Section 3: To appoint the City Administrative Officer or his
designee as the agent of the City of San Luis Obispo to conduct all
negotiations, execute and submit all documents pursuant to the
City's Purchasing Manual. All original documents including, but
not limited to, the applications, agreements and amendments are to
be retained in the Office of the City Clerk.
Section 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to furnish an
executed' copy of this resolution for attachment to approved
application and other supporting materials as may be required for
forwarding to:
Cal Trans, Department of Transportation
District 5, 50 Higuera Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Cal Trans, Division of Mass Transportation
1120 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that authorizing an application
for an UMTA Section 18 Discretionary Grant to purchase one transit
coach is hereby approved.
R -7026
Page Two
Resolution No. 7026(1991 SERIES)
On motion of Council= Reiss , seconded by
Councilman Roalman and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council ers Reiss, Roalman., Rappa, PiMrd and Mayor Dumin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of
September 1991. r,
Ron
ATTEST:
City Jerk Pam ges
APPROVED:
\coach.rpt
V(
� � VA ,�
r�j
RESOLUTION NO. 7025 (1991 Series)
AUTHORIZING FUEL EFFICIENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo recognizes that it is in
the interest of.the national economy to promote the conservation
of energy resources and to reduce our nation's dependence on
costly foreign oil; and
WHEREAS, fuel efficient traffic signal management by the City
of San Luis Obispo will provide benefits to the local community
in the form of improved traffic flow, reduced fuel consumption,
reduced vehicle operating costs, reduced air pollution emissions,
and improved safety due to smoother flow; and
WHEREAS, funds have been established and are available
through the California Department of Transportation for grants to
local governments for efficient traffic signal management
projects;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo authorizes the submittal of an
application to the California Department of Transportation for a
Fuel Efficient Traffic Signal Management.grant and the Director
of Public Works of the City of San Luis Obispo is hereby
authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of
San Luis Obispo all necessary applications, contracts, and
agreements to implement and carry out the purposes specified in
this resolution.
Upon motion of Counri loran Rai ca , seconded by Cotmcilman Roalman
and on the following roll call vote:
R -7025
Resolution No. 7025 (1991 Series)
Page Two.
AYES: Council hers Reiss, Roalman, Rappa, Pinard and Mayor Dumin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 3rd day of S tvvhPr,
1991.
MAYOR Rm aJNIN
ATTEST:
Lo'
CITY �LERK PAM GES
APPROVED:
'e�4 / P eem, .
City Adminis_ ative O fi er
t ,t^t me
Finance Director
Public Works Director
lhftrant -app
by
• WCSTµpNT- qVG.�� - -
E� $ EXHIBIT A
oxr we.
W6lUAND OR. o. dI GARTM OR , "\
WARREN N4 CTOt03A. IG
n O FCLTON wAY ,\ •�" 0 li J
y r (\
J o o I
rooTrili.L .I3Lw. 9 9 1 4 <
� ooNo
RAMONA ORNB O �. RMONA DRIVe ' C
OtSt%ET'
7 OCL MAR CS � In-'s
y.`.� OR' _ R
r
h
u
I 4
i
I
t
s�?SR
0
f
C /
3 °r
r
5�r �
L� I Ir�1
PRI'�LRHJ�S i I _
to
a s
�C SAN LUIS OBISPO
m � C
d
30 1992 FETSIM PROJECT
a = v
r
A b h
r
BRIDGE 3
Xyll r7
w
-D v
All
•
•
•
•