HomeMy WebLinkAbout8050-8102RESOLUTION NO. 8102 (1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION APPLICATION FOR NINE UNITS
AT 533 PISMO STREET (CON 3492)
WHEREAS, an application has been made for conversion to condominiums
of nine units at 533 Pismo Street; and
WHEREAS, that this council, after consideration of the Planning Commission's
recommendation, staff recommendations and reports thereof, finds that the proposed
condominium conversion is appropriate based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions and exception:
SECTION 1 Exceptions to Property Development Standards
Exceptions to the minimum conversion project size to allow nine units to be converted when ten
is normally required; to allow a seven foot wide private open space area for units 8 and 9 where
ten feet is normally required; and to allow an 11 foot street yard for a storage enclosure where
15 feet is normally required are hereby approved, based on the following findings:
1. Compliance with the project size limit would not be practical due to the number
of units existing on the site.
2. The exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties in the same vicinity with the same zoning.
3. No feasible alternative to authorizing the exception would satisfy the intent of city
policies which encourage provision of variety of rental and individually -owned
units in all price ranges within the city.
4. Exceptions to the open space minimum dimension requirements for units 8 and
9 will not significantly impair the residents' use.and enjoyment of private open
space areas, and no public purpose would be served by strict adherence to this
condominium development standard.
R -8102
Council Resolution No. 8102(1992 Series)
Page 2
5. A reduced street yard setback from 15 feet to 11 feet on Beach Street to allow
one, four foot by seven foot storage enclosure is minor and poses no
environmental, esthetic, health, or safety impacts to people living or working at
the site or in the vicinity.
SECTION 2. Findings.
1. All provisions of the Condominium Development and Conversion Regulations have been
or will be met, with the exception to property improvements noted above.
2. The proposed conversion is consistent with the general plan.
3. Adequate facts exist to support the following findings required by the State Subdivision
Map Act:
A. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in
the R -3 -H zone.
B. The design of the condominium conversion and the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious health problems, or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
C. The design of the condominium conversion or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements for access through (or use of property within) the
proposed condominium conversion:
4. The proposed conversion will not displace a significant number of low - income or
moderate- income households or senior citizen_ s at a time when no equivalent housing is
readily available.
5. The proposed conversion is subject to conditions of approval which will ensure
substantial compliance with building and housing codes and zoning regulations which are
currently in effect.
SECTION 3. Conditions,
1. Applicant shall install an upgraded fire hydrant (location # I- 12 -26) to provide adequate
fire protection, to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
2. Applicant shall refurbish and repair the structures and building service equipment (piping,
wiring, heaters, etc.) as recommended in the property condition report, and to the
approval of the Chief Building Official.
Council Resolution No. $102 (1992 Series)
Page 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that the application referred to hereinabove hereby is approved.
On motion of Council Member Rappa , seconded by
Council Member Romero , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of
December , 1992.
Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
i
e Gladwell, City Clerk
C
Council Resolution No.8102 (1992 Series)
Page 4
APPROVED:
RI x I AA
I.. - -
i�
tw, ��
J, J J�
r
RESOLUTION NO. 8101 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1885
LOCATED AT 1411 MARSH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Tract 1885 and.the Planning
Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof, makes the following findings:
1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements
are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the O zone.
3. The design of the tentative map and the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause serious health
problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially
and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not conflict with easements for access through, or use
of property within, the proposed subdivision.
5. The Community Development Director has determined that the
proposed subdivision is exempt from environmental review.
6. The single -lot air -space condominiums meet the intent of
water service regulations in the Subdivision Ordinance.
SECTION 2. Exceptions. That the requested exception to
eliminate the requirement for individual water service to each of
the proposed units is not mandated by Section 16.36.250 J.2. of
the Subdivision Regulations because this is an air -space
condominium on a single lot, and further, the Council finds that
a master water meter to the entire project is acceptable.
R -8101
Resolution No. 8101. (1992 Series)
Tract 1885
Page 2
SECTION 3. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map
for Tract 1885 be subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit a final map for approval and
recordation.
2. The final map shall note a blanket easement over the common
lot area, except under the structures, for underground
public utilities serving the site, to the approval of the
City Engineer and affected utility agencies.
3. The applicant shall establish covenants, conditions, and
restrictions for the regulation of land use control of
nuisances and architectural control of the building and
facilities. These CC &R's shall be approved by the Community
Development Director and administered by a property owners'
association.
4. There shall be no change in city - regulated provisions of the
CC &R's without prior approval of the Community Development
Director.
5. The applicant shall include the following provisions in the
CC &R's for the tract:
a. The property owners' association shall be created to
enforce the CC &R's and provide for professional,
perpetual maintenance of common areas, including, but
not limited to, the driveway, parking lot, landscaping,
sewer, utilities, and building exteriors.
b. The right shall be granted to the city to maintain
common areas if the property owners' association fails
to do so and to assess said association for expenses
incurred.
C. Each unit shall have a proportionate share of the
par -king and there shall also be provisions for common
parking.
d. A system for equitably prorating water costs for
individual condominium units.
�I
Resolution No. 8101 (1992 Series)
Tract 1885
Page 3
6. The applicant shall dedicate an easement over that portion
of San Luis Obispo Creek within the subject property for
maintenance and pedestrian access to the satisfaction of the
Community Development Director and the City Engineer.
7. The applicant shall replace any existing toilets in the
project that use more than 1.6 gallons per flush with
toilets that use 1.6 gallons or less.
On motion of Council Member Settle
seconded by Council Member Rappa , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Rappa, Roalman, and Romero
NOES: Mayor Pinard
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day
of December , 1992.
Mayor P Pinard
ATTEST:
-i
clerk iane diadwell
I
i
Resolution No.8101 (1992 Series)
Tract 1885
Page 4
APPROVED:
6�2t A� J 7!�-
City dministra ive fficer
r
0
.RESOLUTION NO. 8100 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY. OF SAN LUIS THE, DECLARING'
THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION
HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992
WHEREAS, a. General Muncipal Election was held in the City of San Luis Obispo
on the 3rd day of November, 1992, which election was duly held and conducted in the
manner provided by the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo, and as provided by law for
the purpose of voting for the election of a Mayor and two Council Members and Measure
H.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of CityCounci! Resolution 8028 (1992 Series), the
Board of Supervisors was authorized to perform the official canvass of the November 3,
1992 General Municipal Election pursuant to the election laws of the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, a statement of the results of said election has been duly entered by the
City Clerk in the official records of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE_ D by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that:
SECTION. 1. The whole, number of votes cast in said election within the City of San
Luis Obispo was 23,056.
SECTION 2. Th-e names of the persons voted for, the office for which each person
was voted for, the number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and the number
of votes for:and against Measure Hand number of votes at each precinct, are shown by the
tabulaton of votes marked Exhibit 'B" and attached hereto, and by this reference
incorporated as though fully set forth.
SECTION,3. PEG PINARD, ihe.candidate receiving the highest number of votes
cast at said election for the office of Mayor, is hereby declared elected to such office for the
term prescribed by the City Charter:
SECTION 4. DAVE20MERO AND ALLEN K SETTLE, the two candidates
receiving the highest number of votes cast. at said election for the Office of City Council
Member, are and each of them is hereby declared elected to such office for the term
prescribed by the City Charter.
R -8100
C
10
Resolution No.gloo(1992 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 5. The City Council does declare and determine that as a result of said
election, the majority of the qualified voters voting on the measure did vote in favor of
Measure H.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to sign and deliver to each of said
Peg Pinard, Dave Romero and Allen K. Settle a certificate of election certifying to his /her
election to his /her respective office, as hereinbefore set forth.
On motion of Council Member Settle ,Seconded by Council Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
0
AYES; Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES:. None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15thday of December, 1992..
ATTEST-
,!9d Glad well, City 'Cloy
Mayor Peg Pi9iard
I horcbj certify that tha foregoing is a fug. Mae
and Correct Copps of R olution 8100
In e&iass her f,
1/20/00
Lists Lee Price, Wo
cly G1&.%
Resolution No. 8100 (1992 Series)
APPROVED:
City A ministrativ Officer
�/J)FNv
i lerk
Page 3
CERTIFICATE.
I, Diane R. Gladwell, the City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, certify that the
following is the final statement of votes cast at the General Municipal Election held in the
City of San Luis Obispo; California, on November 3, 1992
1 - Number of registered voters in City:
28,427
2 - Number of votes cast in the City:
23,056
3 - Tabulation of votes by person:
FOR MAYOR
Peg, Pinard
6,872
Jerry Reiss
5,710
Penny Rappa.
4,310
Cal Massey
4 064
FOR_COr INCIL MEMBER
Allen K Settle
8,489
Dave Romero
7,742
Brent Petersen
7,624
Dodie Williams
5;557
John Lybarger
3,353
David Jeffrey
2,164
David .Friend
1,714
Richie Ray Walker
1,011
4 - Tabulation of votes by preen, (See Exhibit "A")
s
Certificate of November 3, 1992 Election
5 - Tabulation of votes by person (See Exhibit "A")
6 - Tabulation of absentee votes (See Exhibit 'A ")
7 - Tabulation of votes on Measure H (See Exhibit "B ")
Page 2
Witness my hand and the seal of the City Clerk of San Luis Obispo this ist day of
l
December, 1992
ne R. Gladwell, City Clerk
�1
e OF
EXHIBIT "A"
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK
RESULTS OF CANVASS OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1992
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I, FRANCIS M. COONEY, County Clerk- Recorder of the County of San Luis
Obispo, do hereby certify that pursuant to law, I did canvass the returns
of the votes cast at the General Election held on November 3, 1992, in the
City of San Luis Obispo, and that a xerox copy of the Statement of Votes
Cast (the original of which is on file in the Office of the County Clerk)
to which this certificate is attached,, shows the number of votes cast in
said City for and against each candidate for the office of Mayor and Member
of the City Council, and that the totals shown for and against each candidate
for the 'office of Mayor and Member of the City Council, in'said City, and
in each of the respective precincts therein, are full, true and correct.
WITNESS, my hand and Official Seal this day of November, 1992.
FR . COONEY, ounty Clerk -Rec er
,
,
,
,
,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
6ENERAL ELECTION 11 -3-"92
CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO
- MAYOR
Pace 9. 1
Precinct
Voters
Trnout
Pct
8
C
D
E
F
6 H I J
------------------------
- - -
-A
- - ------
K l
Precinct Number CN064
1055
740
76.1
42
-
0
- -- --
140
--- - -- -
249
-- - -- --
112
- --- -
196
- - - -- - --- -- - - --- - -----
1
Precinct Number CN065
946
511
61.0
66
0
94
125
112
180
0
Precinct Number CN066
982
644
65.6
56
0
115
188
86
198
1
Precinct Number CN067
975
628
64.4
46
0
138
187
104
151
2
Precinct Number CN068
753
461
61.2
30
1
90
132
37
169
1
Precinct Humber CNO69
1085
735
67.7
60
0
139
155
127
252
!
Precinct Number CN070
1112
757
68.1
67
2
116
160
144
266
2
Precinct Number,CN071
987
685
69.4
66
0
225
105
76
311
_
1
Precinct Number CH072
924
594
64:3
71
1
112
92
105
212
0
Precinct Number CN073
990
681
68.8
48
4
137
153
120
219
1
Precinct Number CN074
722
452
62.6
38
0
97
101
86
129
1
Precinct Number CN075
900
574
63.8
45
2
91
134
158
141
3
Precinct Number CN076
787
498
63:3
39
1
135
115
78
130
0
Precinct Number CN071
810
555
68.5
49
3
91
133
108
170
1
Precinct Number CN070
908.
632
69.6
48
0
122
142
141
1/8
1
Precinct Number CN079
903
626
69.3
57
1
127
145
142
153
1
Precinct Number CNO80
791
531
67.1.
33
0
122
138
90
148
0.
Precinct Number CNO81
836
589
70.5
42
2
104
182
96
163
0
Precinct Number CN096
982
677
68.9
37
0
167
191
113
167
2
Precinct. Number CN097
495
367
74.1
17
0
104
130
36
79
1
Precinct Number CN145
1094
767
70.1
84
2
143
193
108
238
0
Precinct Number CN146
1048
697
66.5
76
2
149
118
114
235
3'
Precinct Number CN147
980
616
62.9
70
2
120
145
77
200
2
Precinct Number CN148
911
'487
53.5
35
0
95
103
78
177
0
Precinct Number CN149
98-2
638
65.0
75
1
99
135
129
199
0
Precinct Number CN150
880
593
67.4
58
3
93
101
132.
204
2
s
Precinct Number CH151
1248
850
68.1
122
1
138
181
177
218
2
Precinct Number CN152
1259
803
63.8
96
1
149
174
146
235
2
Precinct Number CM153
1045
676
64.7
89
1
83
222
113
167
1
Precinct Number CN154
959
644
67.2
51
1
115
166
BO
230
1
Absentee. Number AB5064
0
244
0.0
11
2
40
109
42
37
0
Absentee Number ABS065
0
178
0.0
21
0
24
44
37
52
Absentee Number ABS066
0
183
0.0
19
1
30
65
28
40
0
0
Absentee Number ABS067
0
231
0.0
16
0
41
82
46
45
Absentee Number ABS068
0
181
0.0
4
1
27
83
23
0
t
Absentee Number ARS069
0
150
0.0
8
2
17
35
42
43
0
Absentee Number ABS070
0
127
0.0
10
0
29
16
22
46
50
0
0
Absentee Number ABS071
0
90
0.0
6
0
20
25
14
25
Absentee Number ABS072
0
93
0.0
13
2
10
21
18
28
0
1
--- --------- �z- -- ------
- -- ---------------
--
C O L
U M N
L E 6 E N D
A: MAYOR
D:
MAYOR
6:
MAYOR
J°
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO .
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
Blank Votes
JERRY
REISS
Nritein
Votes
B: MAYOR
E:
MAYOR
H:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
K:
Over Votes
CAL HASSEY
C: MAYOR
F:
MAYOR
I:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
L'
PENNY RAPPA
PEG PINARD
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ...
ELEION 11-3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MAYOR
Precinct
------- --- -- - - --=° C O L M N
Voters
- ----
Trnout
------
Pct
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
Absentee Number
ABS073
0
113
- - - --
Q.0
- -- --- ----
10
--
0
-- --
16
-= -
34.
------
18
- - -- -- ------
34
-
1
Absentee Number
ABSOA
0
140
0.0
8
0
39
31
32
30
0
Absentee Number
ABS075
0
167
0:0
14
0
36
37
45
35
0
Absentee Number
ADS076
0
187
0.0
4
0
52
46
42
41
2
Absentee Number
ABS077
0
99
0.0
5
0
16
20
32
25
1
Absentee Number
ABS018
0
113
0..0
SO
0
. 22
29
20
32
0
Absentee Number
ABS079
0
124
0.0
7`
1
21
31
32
26
0
Absentee Number
ABS080
0
209
0.0
6
0
43
57
42
61
0
Absentee Number
ABS081
0
130
0.0
9
0
16
43
27
-34
1
Absentee Number
ABS096
0
174
0.0
3
1
40
45
25
60
0
Absentee. Number
ABS097
0
86
0.0 .
1
1
29
25
11
18
0
Absentee Number
ADS145
J
85
0.0
16
0
7
27
16
25
0
Absentee Number
ABS146
0
132
0.0
18
1
25
21
28
37
2
Absentee. Number
ABS147
0
148
0.0
13
1
22
47
i8
45
2
Absentee Number
ABS148
0
237
0.0
17
3
38
55
38
86
0
Absentee Number
ABSI-49
0
106
0.0
13
0
10
25
26
32,
0
Absentee Number
ABS150
0
127
0.0
6
1
24
35
31
29
1
Absentee Number
ABS151
0
90
0.0
2
0
12
33
22
24
0
Absentee Number AB5152
0
58'
0.0
9
0
5
9
20
15
0
Absentee Number
ADS153
0
40
0.0
1
1
6,
12
10
9
1
Absentee Number
ABS154
0
171
0.0
11
6
25
48
26
61
0
Absentee Number
SC524
78
69
88.5
4
0
12 ._
25
6
22
0
__> Precinct. Totals
28349
18774
66.2
1713
31
3550
4495
3225
5725
34
= =3 Absentee Totals
78
4282
11tt4
290
18
760
1215
839
1147
12
= => Total Vates
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
Page 9. 2
N I J 'K I
--- --- -- - - - - -- -- - - - --
------- --- -- - - --=° C O L M N
L E G E N D - - - --- ------------------------------------------
A: MAYOR
0: MAYOR
6: MAYOR J.
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
-
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
JERRY REISS
Nritein Votes
B. MAYOR
Ed MAYOR
H:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ti
Over Votes_
CAL MASSEY
_ ,AS
C: MAYOR
F• MAYOR
Ia
SIM LUIS OBTSPO
SAN:LUI$ OBISPO
Lr
PENNY RAPPA
PEG "PINARD
I
- t
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION
11 -3 -92 CITY
OF
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
MAYOR
L E
Pace 9.
R E C A P
Voters
Trnout
Pct
.A
B
C
0
E
F
6 N 1
TOTAL DIST 1 SUPERVISOR
•0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL DIST 2 SUPERVISOR
1055
984
93.3
54
2
180
358
154
233
1
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734
82.6
1031
24
2420
3086
2330
3817
23
TOTAL DIST 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304
86.3
58
2
340
391
185
324
3
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10484
8034
76.6
860
21
1370
1875
1395
2498
19
TOTAL VOTERS
20427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
.28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
28427
23056
81.1
.2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF GROVER CITY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
26427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
78
4282
44144
290
18
760
i215
839
1147
12
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6972
46
J K L
r
-------- --- ---- =- ----- ----
----- -- - - - - -- C 0 L U M N
L E
6 E N D --- - - ------------- - ---- - --- -
A: MAYOR
D: MAYOR
6:
MAYOR J:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
JERRY REISS
Nritein Votes
B: MAYOR
E: MAYOR
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
CAL MASSEY
C: MAYOR
F: MAYOR
+•
Lc
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
PENNY RAPPA
PEG PINARD
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Page 10. 1
Precinct
C
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
Precinct
- ---
Number CN064
- - - - --
1055
- - - - --
740
- - ---
70.1
- -- -
42
Precinct
Number CN065
946
577.
61.0
71
Precinct
Number CN066
982
644
65.6
60
Precinct
Number CN067
975
628
64.4
48
Precinct
Number CN06B
753
461
61.2
30
Precinct
Number CM069
1085
735
67.7
68
Precinct
Number CN070
1.112
757
68.1
75
Precinct
Number CN071
987
685
69.4
64
Precinct
Number CN072
924
594
64:3
85
Precinct
Number CN073
990
681
68.8
55
Precinct
Number CN074
722
451
62.6
38
Precinct
Number CN075
900
574
63.8
56
Precinct
Number CN076
787
448
63.3
44
Precinct
Number CN077.
810
555
68.5
38
Precinct
Number CR678
908
631
69.6
41
Precinct
Number CN079
903
626
69.3
64
Precinct
Number CN080
791
531
67.1
38
Precinct
Number CN081
836
589
70.5
42
Precinct
Number CN096
982
677
68.9
17
Precinct
Number CN097
495
367
74.1
14
Precinct
Number CN145
1094
767
70.1
68
Precinct
Number CN146
1048
697
66.5
70
Precinct
Number CN147
990
616
62.9
79
Precinct
Number CN149
911
487
53.5
37
Precinct
Number CN149
982
638
65.0
78
Precinct
Number CM150
880
593
67.4
51
Precinct
Number CNI51
1248
850
68.1
112
Precinct
Number CN152
1259
803
63.8
81
Precinct
Number CN153
1045
676
64.7
72
Precinct
Number CN154
959
644
67.2
52
Absentee
Number ABS064
0
244
0.0
11
Absentee
Nueber.40SO65
0
178
0.0
14
Absentee
Number ABS066
0
183
0.0
20
Absentee
Number ABS067
0
231
0.0
17
Absentee
Number ABS068
0
181
0.0
7
Absentee
Number ABS069
0
150
0.0
9
Absentee Number ABS070
0
127
0.0
10
Absentee Number ABS071
0
90
0.0
7
Absentee Number ADS072
0
93
0.0
11
9
C
D
E
F
6
N
- -----
I
J
K L
0
48
44
267
330
- -
95
- - --
.205
8
-- -
276
- - - -- -- ---
1
0
63
80
189
188
96
143
40
103
0
2
38
56
212
245
117
144
28
199
3
1
33
64
217
276
68
170
25
203
0
0
24
27
172
191
72
130
11
160
0
1
50
.102
269
198
86
299
36
144
4
3
74
86
139
203
106
268
54
156
0
3
36
50
281
159
111
318
23
129
2
0
39
56
192
136
87
206
42
117
1
2
47
75
216
218
102
236
35
170
1
1
31
37
155
167
67
113
22
138
2
2
78
67
165
210
86
130
52
118
2
0
27
61
. 165
179
78
125
31
157
1
1
57
58
251
160
78
206
24
9Z
0
0
64
55
273
200
75
216
49
122
0
2
55
77
223
217
69
173
31
147
1
1
26
50
201
212
69
123
24
172
0
2
30
58
206
242
84
144
33
187
1
2
57
97
198
27b
136
.133
34
235
1
0
33
24
106
195
55
73
13
161
1
1
32
48
341
174
90
40B
26
113
1
2
41
55
271
159
105
333
22
110
4
0
39
40
227
171
86
226
18
135
7
1
31
35
199
172
69
171
11
120
1
63
44
262
155
86
261
19
106
0
2
55
47
238
171
98
220
27
118
2
2
71
76
328
175
84
451
18
84
2
1
45
44
.335
133
82
522
12
52
2
2
32
50
317
106
45
448
7
59
4
0
30
30
289
185
102
272
23
136
3
0
22
13
70
150
29
34
9
103
0
1
24
30 .
66
72
37
14
9
44
0
1
23
20
52
77
28
32
12
50
0
1
17
32
77
123
29
33
5
85
0
0
1
13
45
117
28
25
9
86
1
2
15
28
44
64
33
32
7
33
1
0
11
17
39
40
33
34
7
35
0
0
6
7
33
43
12
28
2
23
0
0
3
8
27
36
25
16
8
25
2
C 0 L U M N L E 6 E N D -- -------- - _- ----------- --- ------
- __�__ ---
A: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
D: MBR CITY COUNCIL
6: MDR CITY COUNCIL
J: MBR CITY COUNCIL
Blank Votes
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID ALLEN 4EFFREY
JOHN LYBARSER
DODIE WILLIAMS
B: MBR CITY COUNCIL
E: MBR CITY COUNCIL
N: NBR CITY COUNCIL
K: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ALLEN K. SETTLE
BRENT PETERSEN
Nritein Votes
C: MBR CITY COUNCIL
F: NBR CITY COUNCIL
I: HER CITY COUNCIL
L`
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS
DAVID R. FRIEND
DAVE MEN
RICHIE RAY WALKER
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Pace 10. 2
Precinct
Absentee Number ABS073
Absentee Number ABS074
Absentee lumber ABS075
Absentee Number ABS076
Absentee Number ABS077
Absentee Number ABS078
Absentee Number ABS079
Absentee Number ABSOBO
Absentee Number ABS081
Absentee Number ABS096
Absentee Number ABS097
Absentee Number ABS145
Absentee Number ABS146
Absentee Number ABS147
Absentee Number ABS148
Absentee Number ABS149
Absentee Number ABS150
Absentee Number ABS151
Absentee Number ASS152
Absentee Number ABS153
Absentee Number A95154
Absentee Number SL524
= => Precinct Totals
=> Absentee Totals
=_> Total Yates
A: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
B: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
C: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS ORTSPA
DAVID R. FRIEND
Voters Trnout
- - - --- ---- --
Pct
-----
A
- - - --- --
B
- - --
C
-- ----
D
---- --
E
- - ----
F
--
6
H
I
J
K L
0
113
0.0
16
0
12
10
27
----
49
------
18
-- - ---
14
- --- --
8
-- -- -- --
31
- --- --- - --
1
0
140
0.0
7
0
12
16
47
66
23
14
5
59
0
0
167
0.0
14
0
27
33
57
73
27
15
13
36
0
0
187
0.0
4
0
7
30
70
97
40
29
6
65
0
0
99
0.0
5
0
11
13
44
45
17
It
9
19
0
0
113
0.0
6
0
10
13
49
38
20
27
7
34
0
0
124
0.0
8
0
14
9
48
52
14
22
6
44
0
0
209
0.0
B
0
6
18
87
98
34
40
6
78
1
0
130
0.0
7
0
9
10
53
66
25
19
3
38
0
0
174
0.0
9
0
12
17
42
88
37
34
8
69
1
0
86
0.0
1
1
6
6
27
43
13
9
2
44
0
0
85
0.0
7
0
7
11
35
28
8
29
2
21
0
0
132
0.0
12
0
13
20.
29
47
34
29
7
34
1
0
148
0.0
16
0
10
11
49
57
33
28
8
42
0
0
237
0.0
19
0
23
24
101
104
52
38
7
53
0 s,
0
106
0.0
B
0
7
12
39
47
28
24
4
17
1 r
0
127
0.0
4
0
16
10
46
61
19
19
12
40
0
90
0.0
5
0
9
11
41
36
5
29
4
23
0
0
58
0.0
7
0
7
5
26
9
11
20
6
4
0
0
40
0.0
0
0
3
1
15
12
6
22
1
6
1
0
171
0.0
11
0
12
9
69
67
40
26
8
66
0
7B
69
88.5
1
0
4
3
31
34
9
11
3
35
0
28349.
18774
66.2
1710
35
1355
1693
7004
5803
2586
6867.
808
4215
47 N
,s
78
4282 Stitt
281
6
359
471
1485
1939
767
757
203
1342
10
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
1142
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
'--------- - - -- -- C O L U M N
L E 6 E N D -- --------- —_-
D: MBR CITY COUNCIL
6: MBR CITY COUNCIL
J: NBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID ALLEN JEFFREY
JOHN LYBARGER
DODIE WILLIAMS
E: MBR CITY COUNCIL
H: HER CITY COUNCIL
K: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ALLEN K. SETTLE
BRENT PETERSEN
Nritein Votes
F: NBR CITY COUNCIL
1: NBR CITY COUNCIL
L:
LUIS OBISPO
SAW iiii .
OBISPO
DAVE ROM
RICMIE".16* IKKER
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION !1 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER. CITY COUNCIL Page 10.
R E C A P
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
H
I
J
K
TOTAL DIST 1 SUPERVISOR
0
0
- - --
0.0
-- - --- --
0
- - --
0
- -- ---
0
- - - - --
0
- -- - --
0
- - - - --
0
- -- - --
0
-- - ---
0
--- ---
0
- - - - -- -
0
- - - --
0
TOTAL DIST 2 SUPERVISOR
1055
984
93.3
53
0
70
57
337 .
480
124
239
17
379
1
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734
82.6
IOB7
26
986
1376
4491
4557
1894
3549
682
3299
24
TOTAL DIST 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304
88.3
61
3
108
144
373
602
243
249
51
509
3
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10484
8034
76.6
790
12
550
581
3286
2103
1092
3587
.255
1370
29
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
.2164
8489
7742.
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28427
23056
81.1
1991.
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
26427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0
0
010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF GROVER CITY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCADERD
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0
0.0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
78
4282
ttttt
281
6
359
471
1485
1939
767
757
203
1342
10
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
' 3353
7624
1011
5557
57
A: NOR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
8: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
C: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID R. FRIEND
--- ---= -=- ----- C O L U M N
L E 6 E N D --- - - - - --
D: MBR CITY COUNCIL
6: MBR'CITY COUNCIL
J: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO,
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID ALLEN JEFFREY
JOHN LYBARGER
DDDIE WILLIAMS
E: MBR CITY COUNCIL
H: MDR CITY COUNCIL
K: MDR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ALLEN K. SETTLE
BRENT PETERSEN
Writein Votes
F: MBR CITY COUNCIL
l: MBR CITY COUNCIL
L:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO •
DAVE ROMERO
RICHIE RAY WALKER
L
CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
RESULTS OF CANVASS OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1992
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MEASURE "H"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
EXHIBIT dtlitf
I, FRANCIS M. COONEY, County Clerk- Recorder of the County of San
Luis Obispo, do hereby certify that pursuant to law I did canvass the
returns of the votes cast at the above referenced election in said City
on November 3, 1992, and that a xerox copy of the Statement of Votes Cast
(the original of which is on file in the Office of the County Clerk) to
which this certificate is attached, "shows the number of votes cast in said
City for and against said Measure "H ", and that the totals shown for and
against said Measure "H" in said City, and in each of the respective
precincts therein, are full, true and correct.
MEASURE "H ": "Shall Resolution 8001 authorizing the execution
and delivery of a Water Supply Agreement and Water
Treatment and Local Facilities Agreement and
authorizing certain other actions for participation
in the State Water Project be repealed ?"
WITNESS, my hand and Official Seal this � day of November, 1992.
i
FRANCI M. COONEY, unty Clerk -R order
�i
SAN LA OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 MEASURE H - REFERENDUM STATE PATE= Paae 52. 1
Precinct
--------
---- -- ----
=- - --
Voters
- -- - --
Trnout
-- - - --
Pct
-----
A
B
C
D E F 6 H I J K 1
Precinct
Number
CN064
1055
740
-
70.1
- - -- --
56
- - --
0
- --- -- -
325
- -; -- - ----- ---- --= - -- --- - -- - - ---- - --- -- -- -- - --
357
Precinct
Number
CN065
946
577
61.0
65
0
296
216
Precinct
Number
CN066
982
644
65.6
48
1
309
284
Precinct
Number
CN067
975
628
64.4
45
0
296
281
Precinct
Number
CN06B
753
461
61.2
21
1
241
197
Precinct
Number
CN069
1085
735
67.7
73
1
399
260
Precinct
Number
CN070
1112
757
68.1
60
0
428
269
Precinct
Number
C9071
987
685
69.4
73
0
406
206
Precinct
Number
CN072
924
594
64.3
61
0
331
201
Precinct
Number
CR073
990
681
68.8
59
1
377
245
Precinct
Number
CR074 .
722
452
62.6
35
0
216
201
Precinct
Number
CN075
900
574
63.8
55
3
275
241
Precinct
Number
CN076
787
498
63.3
50
0
229
217
Precinct
Number
CN077
810
555
68.5
65
0
272
219
Precinct
Number
CN078
908
632
69..6
50
0
'323
258
Precinct
Number
CN019
903
626
69.3
63
0
273
290
Precinct
Number
CNOBO
791
531
67:1
47
0
24
240
Precinct
Number
CN081
836
589,
70.5
42
0
283
264
Precinct
Number
CN096
982
677
68.9
39
0
29B
340
Precinct
Number
CN097
495
367
74.1
15
0
162
190
Precinct
Number
CN145
1094
767
90.1
99
0
413
255
Precinct
Number
CNI46
1048
697
66.5
99
0
372
225
Precinct
Number
CN147
980
616
62.9
58
1
318
139
Precinct
Number
CN148
911
487
53.5
35
0
265
188
Precinct
Number
CN149
982
638
65.0
84
0
322
232
Precinct.
Number
CN150
880
593
67.4
51
0
331
210
Precinct
Number
CNI51
.1248
B50
68.1
132
0
434
263
Precinct
Number
CM152
1259
803
63.8
126
0
422
255 F
Precinct
Number
CN153
1045
676
64.7
86
0
X584
206
Precinct
Number
CN154
959
644
67.2
53
1
370
219
Absentee
Number
ABS064
0,
244
0.0
13
1
92
136
Absentee
Number
ABSO65
0
178
0.0
21
0
69
88
Absentee
Number
ABS066
0
183
0.0
22
0
67
94
Absentee
Number
ABSOb7
0
231
0.0
.23
0
76
131
Absentee
Number
ABS068
0
161
0.0
9
0
52
120
Absentee
Number
ABS069
0
150
0.0
5
1
75
69
Absentee
Number
ABS070
0
127
0.0
13
0
61
52
Absentee
Number
ABS071
0
90
0.0
9
0
49
32
Absentee Number
ABS072
0
93
0.0
10
0
43
40
A: CITY MEASURE N
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
: B: CITY MEASURE H
: CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
: Over Votes
---= -- - -- -- C O L U M N L E 6.E N D - -- - - -- --
---------------
D: CITY MEASURE N 6; J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H:
C: CITY MEASURE H F:
: CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11
Precinct Voters Trnout Pct
--- --- ----- -- ----- -- -- -- - -- --- ------ - -- --
Absentee Number ABS073 0 113 0.0
Absentee Number ABS074 0 140 0.0
Absentee Number ABS075 0. 167 0.0
Absentee Number ABS076 0 187 0.0
Absentee Number ABS077 0 99 0.0
Absentee Number ABS078 0 113 0.0
Absentee Number ABS079 0 124 0.0
Absentee Number ABS080 0 209 0.0
Absentee Number ABS081 0 130 0.0
Absentee Number ABS096 0 174 0.0
Absentee Number ADS097 0 86 0.0
Absentee Number ABS145 0 85 0.0
Absentee Number ABS146 0 132 0.0
Absentee Number ABS147 0 148 0.0
Absentee. Number ABS148 0 237 0.0
Absentee Number ABS149 0 106 0.0
Absentee Number ABS150 0 127 0.0
Absentee Number ABS151 0 90 0.0
Absentee Number 4BS152 0 58 0.0
Absentee Number ABS153 0 40 0.0
Absentee Number ABS154 0 171 0.0
Absentee Number SL524 78 69 88.5
==? Precinct Totals 28349 18774 66.2
Absentee Totals 78 4282 4tli1
Total Votes 28427 23056 81.1
3 -92 MEASURE V - REFE
A B C
- -- --- -- - --- - -----
27 0 50
5 0 54
12 0 66
16 0 59
4 0 44
5 n 48
17 0 42
5 2 80
13 0 58
13 ry 70
1 0 34
10 0 39
17 1 68
9 1 72
19 0 104
7 0 51
8 0 59
11 0 51
11 0 31
3 0 20
8 2 89
4 1 22
1848 9 9614
340 13 1797
2188 22 11411
RENDUM STATE WATER Page 52. 2
D E F 6 H I i K
- --- - - - --- - - --- --- - -- -- -- --- -- - ----
46
81 °
88
112
51
60
65
122
59
87
50
35
46
66
114
48
60
31
16
17
72
41
7294
2129
9423
-------------- --- --- --------- ----- ----- - - -- -- C O L U M N L E 6 E M D
A: CITY MEASURE H D: CITY MEASURE H 6: d:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes NO
B: CITY MEASURE H E: H: Kr
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C: CITY MEASURE H F: I:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM L.
YES
"---------------- ------- ------ ---- -- -=-=- -•----- C 0 L U M N- L E G E N D
A: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
B: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
D: CITY MEASURE n 6: J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H:
F:
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 MEASURE H
- REFERENDUM
STATE WATER Pane 52.
R E C A P
Voters
Trnout Pct
A
B
C
D
E F 6 H 1 J, K
TOTAL DIST 1 SUPERVISOR
0
---
0 0.0
------ -----
0
0
0
- - - ---
0
- --- -- ------ - - - - -- - ----- --- - -- -- - --- - - - -- - -- --
TOTAL DIST 2 SUPERVISOR
1055
994 93.3
71
1
417
493
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734 82.6
1118
10
6193
5405
TOTAL DISC 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304 88.3
68
4
564
667
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10484
8034 76.6
931
7
4237
2858
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23055 A1.1
.2188
22
11411
9423
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
28427
23056 81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28417
23056 81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
28427
23056 81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
i
0 0.0
0
0
0
1)
CITY OF 6ROVER JTY
0
0 0.0
0
e0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
t
0 0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
28427
23056 81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
CITY OF PISMO BEACN
0
0 0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCAOERO
0
0 0.0
0
6
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0 0.0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
75
4282 ttttt
340
13
1797
2129
TOTAL VOTERS
28421
23056 81.1
2.188
22
11411
9423
"---------------- ------- ------ ---- -- -=-=- -•----- C 0 L U M N- L E G E N D
A: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
B: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
D: CITY MEASURE n 6: J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H:
F:
r.
RESOLUTION NO. 8099
(1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING
THE FINAL TRACT MAP FOR VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 1827 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER
OF FLORENCE AVENUE AND BUSHNELL STREETS (2175 FLORENCE AVENUE)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the subdivider's request, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one -year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
1827 is granted a one -year time extension to November 21, 1993,
subject to the original findings and conditions, as specified in
City Council Resolution No. 6723.
On motion of Council Member Settle
seconded by Council Member Romero and On the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -8099
Resolution No. 8099
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day
of December 1 1992.
Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
ty Clerk Diane Gladwell
APPROVED:
-4e�e� 4z;,n=
City Administrative Officer
/� a wo�--IMU
W
Community Development Director
u
RESOLUTION NO. 8098 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX
REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR THE
STONERIDGE II ANNEXATION (SID COUNTY ANNEXATION #39)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, that:
WHEREAS, in the case of a jurisdictional change which
will alter the service area or responsibility of a local agency,
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that the amount
of property tax revenue to be exchanged, if any, and the amount
of annual tax increment to be exchanged among the affected local
agencies shall be determined by negotiation; and
WHEREAS, when a city is involved, the negotiations are
conducted between the City Council and the Board of Supervisors
of the County; and
WHEREAS, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b)
requires that each local agency, upon completion of negotiations,
adopt resolutions whereby said local agencies agree to accept the
negotiated exchange or property tax revenues, if any, and annual
tax increment and requires that each local agency transmit a copy
of each such resolution to the Executive Officer of the Local
Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, no later than the date on which the
certificate of completion -of the jurisdictional change is
recorded with the-County Recorder, the Executive Officer shall
notify the County Auditor of the exchange of property tax
revenues by transmitting a copy of said resolution to him and the
R -8098
0
Resolution No.8098 (1992 Series)
Page 2
County Auditor shall therefore make the appropriate adjustments
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the negotiations have taken place concerning
the transfer of property tax revenues and annual tax increment
between the County of San Luis Obispo and the City of San Luis
Obispo pursuant to Section 99(b) for the jurisdictional change
designated as Annexation No. 39 to the City of San Luis Obispo
(Stoneridge II); and
WHEREAS, the negotiating parties, to wit: Paul Hood,
Principal Administrative Analyst, County of San Luis Obispo, and
Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer, have
negotiated the exchange of property tax revenue and annual tax
increment between such entities as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that such
negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax
increment be consummated.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo, as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth above are true,
correct, and valid.
2. That the City of San Luis Obispo agrees to accept
the following negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and
annual tax increment:
Resolution No. 8098 (1992 Series)
Page 3
(a) Property tax revenues in the amount of
$ 0 shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo
to the City of San Luis Obispo in the fiscal year 1993 -94.
(b) Annual tax increment in an amount to be
determined by the County Auditor, based upon the following
percentage agreed to by the negotiating parties, 17.120965
percent, shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo
to the City of San Luis Obispo in the fiscal year 1993 -94 and
each fiscal year thereafter.
3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of this
resolution and a copy of the recorded certificate of completion,
the County Auditor shall make the appropriate adjustments to
property tax revenues and annual tax increments as set forth
above.
4. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to
transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the executive
Officer of the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation commission,
who shall then distribute copies in the manner prescribed by law.
On motion of Council Member. Settle
seconded by Council Member Roalman
the following roll call vote:
, and on
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, Rappa, Romero and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Resolution No.8098 (1992 Series)
Page 4
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day
of December , 1992.
Mayor Peg Pi rd
ATTEST:
v,VL.
Cit erk Di ne lV ell
APPROVED:
City A inistrative Officer
p^ ��
RESOLUTION N0. 8097 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 2094
LOCATED AT 3450 BULLOCK LANE
(John Mitchell & Roland Ball - Subdividers)
WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning
Tract No. 2094 as contained in Resolution No. 8002 (1992 Series),
and
WHEREAS, all conditions required per said resolution have been
met or are guaranteed by Letters of Credit on file, and the final
map is in substantial conformity with the approved tentative map.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the final map for Tract No.
2094 is hereby approved and the open -space and public pedestrian
easement is hereby accepted.
On motion of Council Member Settle seconded by Council MdTber Roalman
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, Rappa, Romero and Mayor Pinard
NOES: 'None
ABSENT:
None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this
f;
December 1992.
MAYOR p 4 Pinard
ATTEST:
C$T CLERK lane G adwell
1st day of
R -8097
Resolution No.
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City Adm nistra
Y
tt n�eCyy
maPQ
Community Devel
City Y gineer
jkt/=94 -final
by
(1992 Series)
ve Officer
t Director
-00
r
RESOLUTION NO809(g992 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SUPPORTING THE RETENTION OF $8.00 IN STATE MANDATED COURT FILING
FEES TO FUND THE COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION SERVICES PROGRAMS
We, the undersigned members of the City Council of San Luis Obispo, hereby
petition the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors as follows:
WHEREAS, there exists in our community a need for alternative dispute resolution
leading to a more efficient judicial system and a less litigious and more harmonious
society; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned wish to further the cause of peaceful resolution of
disputes in our country and promote greater access to the legal system for those of
middle and lower incomes;
NOW, THEREFORE, we petition the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors
to adopt a resolution retaining in San Luis Obispo County $8.00 of the state mandated
filing fee to be utilized pursuant to the Garamendi Act of 1986, B & P § 465, to fund
alternative dispute resolution services programs for San Luis Obispo County.
Upon motion of Council Member Settle
Council Member Roalmari and on the following roll call vote:
seconded by
AYES: Council Members Settle, Roalman, „Rappa, Romero and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO.8095 (1992 SERIES)
The resolution was adopted this 1st day of December , 1992.
ATTEST:
Condon, Assistant City Clerk
APPROVED:
ity A inistrative Officer
dh \$8.res
MAYOR EG PINARD
Eff-'alm/lawl
i
� � I�
��s�
city of san Us osispo
Resotution
of APPRCoAtion
95 (1992 Series)
EXPRESSING THE CITY'S GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION
TO COUNCIL MEMBER PEG PINARD
FOR HER DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS
WHEREAS, Peg Pinard has served the City as Council Member from December 1987
to December 1992, a term of five years, serving as Vice -Mayor from December 1988
through January of 1990; and
WHEREAS, Peg has served the City in a variety of positions including Architectural
Review Commissioner 1985 through 1987; the City Personnel Board member from August
1979 through April 1983, the City Fair Election Committee, and has served as Council
Subcommittee Liaison to a variety of City boards, committees and commissions; and
WHEREAS, Peg has been active in the community in a variety of organizations and
committees including the San Luis Obispo County Historical Society, the League of Women
Voters, National Trust Member, Peace Corps Volunteer, and Co- founded the Old Town
Neighborhood Association; and
WHEREAS, Peg has given generously of her time, effort and ability to address the
concerns of the citizens of San Luis Obispo, and made outstanding contributions of long
tern benefit to the City; and
WHEREAS, Peg's special sensitivity to the needs and concerns of community
members, and her desire to provide assistance to them, has made her a caring and an
effective representative of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo, that the City hereby expresses it grateful appreciation to Council Member Peg
Pinard for her many years of dedicated service to the citizens of San Luis Obispo.
Council Member Council Member
On motion of Rnnna , seconded by Reiss and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Pinard
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 30th day of November, 1992.
R. GladwelY, City C n Dunin, Mayor
city of san tins osispo
Resotution
of A
No. 8094 (1992 Series)
E_ XPRESSING THE CITY'S GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION
TO COUNCIL MEMBER JERRY M. REISS
FOR HIS DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS
WHEREAS, Jerry Reiss has served the City as Council Member first elected
December 1987 to November 1992, a term of five years, serving as Vice -Mayor from
January 1990 to December 1990; and
WHEREAS, Jerry has served the City in a variety of positions including Architectural
Review Commissioner from 1977 through 1981, Planning Commissioner from 1981 through
1987 and as Council Subcommittee Liaison to a variety of City boards, committees and
commissions; and
WHEREAS, Jerry has been active in the community in a variety of organizations and
committees including the San Luis Obispo County Historical Society, the San Luis Obispo
Economic Opportunity Commission, and the California Consortium for Prevention of Child
Abuse; and
WHEREAS, Jerry has given a great amount of time; effort and ability to address the
concerns of the citizens of San Luis Obispo, and made outstanding contributions of long
term benefit to the City government; and
WHEREAS, In consideration of the community's health and well- being, Jerry
developed and brought to fruition one of the toughest no- smoking ordinances in the country
and is a powerful advocate of civic action to promote community health;
WHEREAS, Jerry s quick wit has allowed us all to keep perspective and has earned
big laughs in the Council Chambers; and
WHEREAS, Jerry has a long standing concern for the effectiveness of City services,
and the economy of the City government;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, that the City hereby expresses it grateful appreciation to Council Member Jerry
Reiss for his many years of dedicated service to the citizens of San Luis Obispo.
Council.Member Council Member
On motion of Rappa seconded by Pinard , and on the
following roll call vote: .
AYES: council Members Pinard, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Reiss
the foregoing Resolution was passed and
,Dime R.
ty
this 30th day of November 1992.
, Mayor
-- - ----.�
R -8094 112,10
r
RESOLUTION NO. 8093 (1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO.. AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY,
THE EXPENDING OF FUNDS THEREFOR, THE
DESIGNATION OF PERSONNEL TO ACCEPT DEEDS AND GRANTS
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND THE INSTITUTION OF
EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS RE: /
1019 -23 Broad Street (Spradlin)
WHEREAS, California Code of Civil Procedure, Ti a VII of Part
31 Sections 1230.020, 1240.010, 124010; and 1240.110, and
Sections 37350.5, et sea., of the Government Cod of the State of
California authorizes the City of San Luis Obis to exercise the
power of eminent domain for the purposes of aking property or
property interests necessary to carry out any f the City's powers
or functions; and
WHEREAS, the public inter
acquisition of a portion of the ra
as 1019 -2.3 Broad Street, San Luis
use, namely for a public park, i
access purposes, as part �Qf
facilities; and X
and ,necessity• require the
prop ty hereinafter described
sp , California, for a public
ng pedestrian walkways and
City's park and recreation
WHEREAS, G. D. Spradli ( einafter "Owner ") is the record
owner of the property to b c red, herein described as a portion
of 1019 -23 Broad Street,' n is Obispo, California; and
WHEREAS, the City of Luis Obispo is authorized to exercise
the power of eminent(80 for the purpose of taking such property
by virtue of Govern Code Section 37350.5 and Code of Civil
Procedure Sego -Li � 020, 1240.010, 1240.020 and 1240.110; and
WHEREASI, r t to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section
1245.235, noti opportunity to be heard was given to the
person shown on last equalized county assessment role as the
owner; and
WHEREAS, ursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 the owner
of record w offered just compensation for the real property
hereinafter escribed, and provided with a proper Appraisal Summary
Statement; and
AS, the Project was designated and approved after
extstudy and public consultation to be located in the mostdus area of the City and in such a way as to impair and
obs little private property as possible and to provide
ac the San Luis Creek area.
Seen -8150
R -8093
Resolution No. 8093 (1992 Series)
Page Two
WHEREAS, on January 2, 1980 by Resolution No. 4067 this
Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Mission Plaza Extension Project pursuant to State and City laws;
and
WHEREAS, on May 14, 1981 by Resolution No. 4484, this Council
certified that the Project was compatible with land use plans of
surrounding jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 1981 the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo determined that the land acquisition for the
Project was consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1982 by Resolution No. 4866, this Council
approved and determined that this Project is consistent with the
City's General Plan, in particular the Park and Recreation Element
of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, after public noticed hearing on January 2, 1980, and
pursuant to the certified Environmental Impact Report, this Council
conceptually approved the design and plans of the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, as follows:
1. That the portion of the real property situated at 1019 -23
Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, California, to be acquired herein is
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, a diagrammatic illustration of the parcel of real
property and that portion to be acquired herein;
2. The public interest and necessity require the acquisition,
construction, completion and implementation of the Mission Plaza
Extension Project; said Project is a public park project, a public
use, and that portion of the property described as 1019 -23 Broad
Street, San Luis Obispo, California, as set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A ", is to be taken for such public use;
3. The public,interest and necessity require the acquisition
of that portion of the real property described above and on Exhibit
"A" and the taking of said real property described above and on
Exhibit "A" and the taking of said real property and all interests
is necessary for the construction, completion and operation of the
Project, and it is hereby directed that said real property and
interests described above is to be acquired by the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, by eminent domain proceedings as hereinafter
set forth;
Resolution No. 8093 (1992 Series)
Page Three
4. Said Project is planned and located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least
private injury; that said Project will provide a pedestrian walkway
and access for, inter alia, creek maintenance, thus benefiting the
general public;
5. That the statutory offer required by Government Code
Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record;
6. The City Attorney and the City Administrative Officer are
authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary on behalf of
the City for the acquisition of said interest in real property, and
said City Attorney and City Administrative are further authorized
to instruct Special Condemnation Counsel HERMAN H. FITZGERALD
and /or CHRISTINE C. FITZGERALD to prepare, institute, and prosecute
to conclusion on behalf of this City, a proceeding in eminent
domain, or any such proceedings as may be required for the
acquisition of the property described above which cannot be
acquired through negotiation and purchase and to do any and all
other things in connection with such proceedings as in his /her
judgment may be necessary or convenient to the successful
conclusion of said proceeding or proceedings;
7. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to
expend funds available to the City for the acquisition of the said
real property and interests;
S. The City Administrative Officer is hereby individually
authorized and directed to consent to and accept, on behalf of the
City, all deeds and grants conveying any interest in the property
as hereinabove described;
9. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo. It
may thereafter be referred to in any acceptance by any of the
officers or agents referred to herein with the same effect as
though a certified copy of this Resolution were attached to the
document accepted.
UPON MOTION of Council Member Roalman , seconded by _
Council Member Pinard , and on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Members Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
Noes: None
Absent: Council Member Rappa
Resolution No. 8093 (1992 Series)
Page Four
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 17th day of November
1992.
MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
c
1 Clerk biane tladwell
APPRO B— O FORM:
City inistrative Officer
;Zvja�
� 7/
i At or
sH
C4 .,�. •' 1.• �'. _ 7y r K7r : ♦ •• ` •q\ `•S '.`y (a / •1 { '
h.
of .,1 I�I I'I. 1�'IM �_!rLj 1 •` \. ♦ •lA
fA
pi
fa
6 21
po
Ja
Sl
i It r
it
r
' "� :' +�;.�`? � ����� :(� Vie-• % .,,; ," h = � � _j 'j �
- (► dal, '� '' -
" ( i it .~I" �' �t� \� ` �- �/�•�^�':�.. 'I,- � i�,. ` a_
I t CT
PC En
� ter•_ . �• �j � t'+'f
S .• { I �: � Via , .• � � ® z a
3 '•
2 •
EXHIBIT "Atl
��� �� ��
`- �.
��1����
�"�� C
Q ��,�
��� ,.��
��
�:: _. ;,
w .," ;;
.y f:: �'
i.l~ �� r
s � ,.
rs ��i .YO ::
�bp���
4�
RESOLUTION NO. 8092 (1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY,
THEE %PENDING OF FUNDS THEREFOR, THE
DESIGNATION OF PERSONNEL TO ACCEPT DEEDS AND GRANTS
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY,AND THE INSTITUTION OF
EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS RE:
679 Monterey Street (Miller /Walter)
WHEREAS, California Code of Civil Procedure, *Title VII of Part
3, Sections 1230,20, 1240.010, 1240,020, and 1240.110, and
Sections 37350.5, et sect., of the Government Code of the State of
California authorizes the City of San Luis Obispo to exercise the
power of eminent domain for the purposes of taking property or
property interests necessary to carry out any of the City's powers
or functions; and
WHEREAS, the public interest and necessity require the
acquisition oZ a portion of the real property hereinafter described
as 679 Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California, for a public
use, namely for a public park, including pedestrian walkways and
access purposes, as part of the City's park and recreation
facilities; and
WHEREAS, Peter C. Miler, Rosemary D. Miller and William S.
Walter (hereinafter "Owner ") are the record owners of the property
to be acquired, herein described as a portion of 679 Monterey
Street; San Luis Obispo, California; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is 'authorized to exercise
the power of eminent domain for the purpose of taking such property
by virtue of Government Code Section 37350.5 and Code of Civil
Procedure Sections 1.230.020, 1240.010, 1240.020 and 1240.110; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Code of. Civil Procedure, Section
1245.235, notice and opportunity to be heard. was given to the
person shown on the last equalized county assessment role as the
owner; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 the owner
of record was offered just compensation for the real property
hereinafter described, and provided with a proper Appraisal Summary
Statement; and
WHEREAS, the Project was designated and approved after
extensive study and public consultation to be located in the most
advantageous area of the City and in such a way as to impair and
obstruct as little private property as possible and to provide
access to the San Luis Creek area.
R -8092
Resolution No. 8092 (1992 Series)
Page Two
WHEREAS, on January 2, 1980 by Resolution No. 4067 this
Council certified the Final Environmental. Impact Report for the
Mission Plaza Extension Project pursuant to State and City laws;
and
WHEREAS, on May 14, 1981 by Resolution No. 4484, this Council
certified that the Project was compatible with land use plans of
surrounding jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 1981 the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo determined that the land acquisition for the
Project was consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1982 by Resolution No. 4866, this Council
approved and determined that this Project is consistent with the
City's General Plan, in particular the Park and Recreation Element
of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, after public noticed hearing on January 2, 1980, and
pursuant to the certified Environmental Impact Report, this Council
conceptually approved the design and plans of the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of. the City
of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, as follows:
1. That the portion of the real property situated at 679
Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California, to be acquired herein
is described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, a diagrammatic illustration of the parcel of real
property and that portion to be acquired herein;
2. The public interest and necessity require the acquisition,
construction, completion and implementation of the Mission Plaza
Extension Project; said Project is a public park project, a public
use, and that portion of the property described as 679 Monterey
St., San Luis Obispo, California, as set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A ", is to be taken for such public use;
3. The public interest and necessity require the acquisition
of that portion of the real property described above and on Exhibit
"A" and the taking of said real property described above and on
Exhibit "A" and the taking of said real property and all interests
is necessary for the construction, completion and operation of the
Project, and it is hereby directed that said real property and
interests described above is to be acquired by the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, by eminent domain proceedings as hereinafter
set forth;
Resolution No. 8092 (1992 Series)
Page Three
4. Said Project is planned and located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least
private injury; that said Project will provide a pedestrian walkway
and access for, inter alia, creek maintenance, thus benefiting the
general public;
5. That the statutory offer required by Government Code
Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record;
6. The City Attorney and the City Administrative Officer are
authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary on behalf of
the City for the acquisition of said interest in real property, and
said City Attorney and City Administrative are further authorized
to instruct Special Condemnation Counsel HERMAN H. FITZGERALD
and /or CHRISTINE C. FITZGERALD to prepare, institute, and prosecute
to conclusion on behalf of this City, a proceeding in eminent
domain, or any such proceedings as may be required for the
acquisition of the property described above which cannot be
acquired through negotiation and purchase and to do any and all
other things in connection with such proceedings as in his /her
judgment may be necessary or convenient to the successful
conclusion of said proceeding or proceedings;
7. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to
expend funds available to the City for the acquisition of the said
real property and interests;
8. The City Administrative Officer is hereby individually
authorized and directed to consent to and accept, on behalf of the
City, all deeds and grants conveying any interest in the property
as hereinabove described;
9. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo. It
may thereafter be referred to in any acceptance by any of the
officers or agents referred to herein with the same effect as
though a certified copy of this Resolution were attached to the
document accepted.
UPON MOTION of Council Member Roalman , seconded by _
Council Member Pinard , and on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Members Roalman, Pinard, Reiss,..and Mayor Dunin
Noes: None
Absent: Council Member Rappa
Resolution No. 8092 (1992 Series)
Page Four
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 17th day of November ,
1992.
OR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
a�� D
gjefy Clerk Dian Gladwell
APPROV FORM:
ity A inistrative Officer
.,--� � I I/ :.,.,:y� .•;rte:,. • •_ {
IL
ivsss, O m O
40 so 0
LA
ro .� � ► / / / //�..i Ill, /i �.iJ, .\ / • ,
M V N rG to I{ {III• l•w a1�17•' } ` O ;/ ;y�
CJS �i O OI
°— TFi•: • . J:�' °.A.r.r„A. �' . • � •Z. !Kr �, •� t .
CD
j 10
I _ __ •• 4 J r m m W � � '.IIIi II T. '' A(f� v w- ;� � �'��� fa�. •1 •,r i V/
1 II L. i ' � • riA... •,., a a a • C.r
Ic
- I �ji.r � ,�_. ••.'.y: . �� � r ��� .cam �„, �. ,;.
� � ,�� �t� � ,�� is � � :!' �- ii• ', Q
-- 111!
PC
rn
1 a �? i \ .-- -Z�--' ^•�,• -•ate_ .. t
y `' Y
I 7e
i
EXHIBIT "A"
Ap 6
RESOLUTION NO.. 8091
(1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY,
THE E %PENDING OF FUNDS THEREFOR, THE
DESIGNATION OF PERSONNEL TO ACCEPT DEEDS AND GRANTS
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND THE INSTITUTION OF
EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS RE:
667 Monterey Street (Vargas)
WHEREAS, California Code of Civil Procedure, Ti a VII of Part
31 Sections 1230.020, 1240.010, 1240,020, and, 1240.110, and
Sections 37350.5, et sea., of the Governmen/Obio of the State of
California authorizes the City of San Luis to exercise the
power of eminent domain for the urposes ing property or
property interests necessary to cay out ahe City's powers
or functions; and
WHEREAS, the public in
acquisition of a portion of t e
as 667 Monterey Street, San L
use, namely for a public parr
access purposes, as part i
facilities; and
a necessity require the
rty hereinafter described
California, for a public
ing pedestrian walkways and
City's park and recreation
WHEREAS, Kathy Varg(A einafter "Owner ") is the record
owner of the property to c ired, herein described as a portion
of 667 Monterey Stree S is Obispo, California; and
WHEREAS, the C n Luis Obispo is authorized to exercise
the power of mine o a'`for the purpose of taking such property
by virtue f e m Code Section 37350.5 and Code of Civil
Procedure ecti 1 .020, 1240.010, 1240.020 and 1240.110; and
WHE AS nt to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section
235, not a nd opportunity to be heard was given to the
n shown o e last equalized count assessment role as the
1245.
perso y
owner; and
WHEREAS .pursuant to Government Code Section 7267.2 the owner
of record s offered just compensation for the real property
hereinaft 'described, and provided with a proper Appraisal Summary
Statemen .• and
EREAS, the Project was designated and approved after
cte ive study and public consultation to be located in the most
1v tageous area of the City and in such a way as to impair and
3 truct as little private property as possible and to provide
„cess to the San Luis Creek area.
r
R -8091
Resolution No. 8091
Page Two
(1992 Series)
WHEREAS, on January 2, 1980 by Resolution No. 4067 this
Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Mission Plaza Extension Project pursuant to State, and City laws;
and
WHEREAS, on May 14,1981 by Resolution No. 4484, this Council
certified that the Project was compatible with land use plans of
surrounding jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, on July 22, 1981 the Planning Commission of the City
of San Luis Obispo determined that the land acquisition for the
Project was consistent with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1982 by Resolution No. 4866, this Council
.approved and determined that this Project is consistent with the
City's General Plan, in particular the Park and Recreation Element
of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, after public noticed hearing on January 2, 1980, and
pursuant to the certified Environmental Impact Report, this Council .
conceptually approved the design and plans of the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo County, California, as follows:
1. That the portion of the real property situated at 667
Monterey Street, San Luis Obispo, California, to be acquired herein
is described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
reference, a diagrammatic illustration of the parcel. of real
property and that portion to be acquired herein;
2. The public interest and necessity require the acquisition,
construction, completion and implementation of the Mission Plaza
Extension Project; said Project is a public park project, a public
use, and that portion of the property described as 667 Monterey
St., San Luis Obispo, California, as set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A ", is to be taken for such public use;
3. The public interest and necessity require the acquisition
of that portion of the real property described above and on Exhibit
"A" and the taking of said real property described above and on
Exhibit "A" and the taking of said real property and all interests
is necessary for the construction, completion and operation of the
Project, and it is hereby directed that said real property and
interests described above is to be acquired by the City of San Luis
Obispo, California, by eminent domain proceedings as hereinafter
set forth;
Resolution No. 8091 (1992 Series)
Page Three
4. Said Project is planned and located in the manner that
will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least
private injury; that said Project will provide a pedestrian walkway
and access for, inter alia, creek maintenance, thus benefiting the
general public;
5. That the statutory offer required by Government Code
Section 7267.2 has been made to the owner of record;
6. The City Attorney and the City Administrative Officer are
authorized and directed to perform all acts necessary on behalf of
the City for the acquisition of said interest in real property, and
said City Attorney and City Administrative are further authorized
to instruct Special Condemnation Counsel HERMAN H. FITZGERALD
and /or CHRISTINE C. FITZGERALD to prepare, institute, and prosecute
to conclusion on behalf of this City, a proceeding in eminent
domain, or any such proceedings as may be required for the
acquisition of the property described above which cannot be
acquired through negotiation and purchase and to do any and all
other things in connection with such proceedings as in his /her
judgment may be necessary or convenient to the successful
conclusion of said proceeding or proceedings;
7. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to
expend funds available to the City for the acquisition of the said
real property and interests;
8. The City Administrative Officer is hereby individually
authorized and directed to consent to and accept, on behalf of the
City, all deeds and grants conveying any interest in the property
as hereinabove described;
9. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the
Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo. It
may thereafter be referred to in any acceptance by any of the
officers or agents referred to herein with. the same effect as
though a certified copy of this Resolution were attached to the
document accepted.
UPON MOTION of Council Member Roalman seconded by _
Council Member Pinard , and on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council
Noes: None
Absent: Council
Members Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
Member Rappa
Resolution No. 8091 (1992 Series)
Page Four
the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 17th day of November
1992.
OR RON DUNIN
mATTEST: ��
� 9 C Clerki Diane Madwell
eH K
CD
ts 10 CD
r V
LA W m
i 1t
C O m N V v > ! �,� r��l r,r1 .y. •, '• ~• O - • Vii' '. -
40 a LA 00
N N � � � .... •,V� k..t .a �,` • •f��, \�\ � ` a / I .
.� V N N W ..7 ji j � � ♦�
NgN�m
rA
PC
I i s• �•� J.��'�:.i \� • '� r mss: , 4 •� �: -��= � tl � v
it � \ ., h.. = •. � -.� 4'
l a 1''52 ♦� I L .. .. - I , • ��.'`��- r._.•••• A�..'a�— - .. t •' "�`
- 11� • �__ _.�.. �••... • ♦ 3 y
{ ;t
EXHIBIT "A"
Ivi
40-
ew
Igoe 4640i. e
RESOLUTION NO. 8090 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION
CONTINUING A REZONING REQUEST AT 604 AND 690 HENDERSON,
THEREBY DIRECTING THE APPLICANT TO RETURN
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (PD 144 -92)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicant's request to
rezone property PD 144 -92, the Planning Commission's action to
continue the request, and staff recommendations and reports
thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The Planning Commission acted appropriately in continuing
the request; because there was not adequate information
available to make a decision.
2. The Planning Commission's action did not delay the project
unnecessarily.
SECTION 2. Appeal denied. The appeal of the Planning
Commission's action is hereby denied, and the applicant is hereby
directed to return to the Commission for further review and a
recommendation.
On motion of Council Member Roalman
seconded by Council Member Pinard , and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman,Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Couricil-.Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day
of November , 1992.
R -8090
Resolution No. 8099 (1992 Series)
PD 144 -92: 604 and 690 Henderson Avenue
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
Lffppm %`i - i� m i %_ %i
+'
APPROVED:
City A inistrative Officer
��' �a� � -
��
z3��v
.�\
��
RESOLUTION NO. 8089 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTING A FEE CREDIT FOR PERMITS
TO STRENGTHEN UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS
WHEREAS, the City of San. Luis Obispo's Municipal Code
authorizes the establishment of various fees for delivery.of .
municipal services; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo's Municipal Code
requires that owners of unreinforced masonry buildings cause a
structural analysis to be conducted of the building; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo encourages the
reduction of hazards associated with buildings of unreinforced
masonry construction; and
. WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo desires to provide a
financial incentive for strengthening unreinforced masonry
buildings; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and serves an
important municipal purpose to provide such an incentive for the
strengthening of unreinforced masonry buildings by establishing a
credit to be applied to certain city fees for the costs of said
structural analysis; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a noticed public hearing
concerning this fee credit on November 17, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of San Luis Obispo hereby establishes a credit to be applied
to the fees for an architectural review application, plan review,
and /or building permit for strengthening or replacing an
unreinforced masonry building, subject to the following:
A. The work is in accordance with the adopted unreinforced
masonry building strengthening provisions;
B. The amount of the fee credit shall be limited to the
total documented cost to provide the engineering
analysis required by the administrative provisions of
the Uniform Code for Building Conservation or the
combined architectural application, plan review, and
Building Permit fees, whichever is less;
C. The amount of the fee credit shall not be applicable to
M: :1:
Resolution No. $��� (1992 Series)
Page 2
work undertaken in conjunction with the strengthening
project which creates additional floor area;
D. The amount of the fee credit may be applied to a new
building project which will replace an existing
unreinforced masonry building and shall be applicable
to all work involved;
E. The costs associated with the structural analysis are
reasonable and appropriate, subject to approval by the
building official.
Upon motion of Council Member Reis§ seconded by Council Member Pinard
and on the following role call vote:
AYES: Council Members Reiss, Pinard, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 17thday of November ,1992.
r on Dunin '
ATTEST:
I- �2� <34��
i e Gladwell City Clerk
_••;90
City A inistrative Officer
Fierce Director
Director of Oghmqx�ity Development
of BuildiAcr official
(�D
C�.
0
r
r
J
RESOLUTION NO 088(1992 SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL
OF A BICYCLE LANE ACCOUNT APPLICATION TO CALTRANS
FOR BICYCLE LANE IMPROVEMENTS ON MADONNA ROAD
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo ( "City") supports bicycling as a form of
transportation that decreases congestion, air pollution and energy consumption; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a project on Madonna Road that would improve
safety and fill an existing gap in the City's bike lane network;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
hereby authorizes the submittal of a Bicycle Lane Account application to Caltrans for the
amount of $27,000 for bicycle lane improvements on Madonna Road.
On motion of Council Member Reiss ,seconded by Council
Member Pinard, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Reiss, Pinard, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES:. None
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 17th day of November . 1992.
Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
r � �', /,%
S I
R -8088
{
Page 2: Resolution 8088(1992 Series)
City A trative Officer
for
LP
oil,
t �
8087
RESOLUTION NO. (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX
REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
WHEREAS, completion of the Broad Street Annexation is one of the City Council's
highest priorities for Fiscal Years 1991 -93; and
WHEREAS, in the case of a jurisdictional change other than a city incorporation or
district formation which will alter the service area or responsibility of a local agency,
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that the amount of property tax
revenue to be exchanged among the affected local agencies shall be determined by
negotiation; and
WHEREAS, when a city is involved, the negotiations are conducted between the
City Council and the Board of Supervisors of the County; and
WHEREAS, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that each local
agency, upon completion of negotiations, adopt resolutions whereby said local agencies
agree to accept the negotiated exchange of property tax revenues, if any, and annual tax
increment and requires that each local agency transmit a copy of each such resolution
to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and
WHEREAS, no later than the date on which the certificate of completion of the
jurisdictional change is recorded with the County Recorder, the Executive Officer shall
notify the County Auditor of the exchange of property tax revenues by transmitting a copy
of said resolutions to him and the County Auditor shall thereafter make the appropriate
adjustments as required by law; and
R -8087
Page 2
RESOLUTION N0.8087 (1992 SERIES)
WHEREAS, the negotiations have taken place concerning the transfer of property
tax revenues and annual tax increment between the County of San Luis Obispo and the
City of San Luis Obispo pursuant to Section 99(b) for the jurisdictional change designated
as Annexation No. 38 to the City of San Luis Obispo (Broad Street); and
WHEREAS, the negotiating parties have negotiated the exchange of property tax
revenue and annual tax increment between such entities as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that such negotiated exchange of property
tax revenues and annual tax. increment be consummated'.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
1. That the recitals set forth above are true, correct and valid.
2.. That the City of San Luis Obispo agrees to accept the following negotiated
exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment:
a. The County will retain all of the existing property tax base in Tax Rate Area
112 -083 and 112 -085 (Broad Street Annexation area).
b. The County of San Luis obispo will transfer 17.120965 percent in increments
to the City of San Luis Obispo in the newly created Tax Rate Area. This
represents the average increment received by the City in all of its other tax
rate areas.
C. An adjustment will be made in Tax Rate Area 003 -008 to transfer from the
City of San Luis Obispo to the County of San Luis Obispo a total base
Page 3
RESOLUTION NO.8087 (1992 SERIES)
amount of $21,000. The allocation factor in this Tax Rate Area will be
adjusted accordingly.
d. The City of San Luis Obispo will receive all sales tax revenues after the
effective date of the annexation.
3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the recorded
certificate of completion, the County Auditor shall make the appropriate
adjustments to property tax. revenues and annual tax increments as set forth
above.
4. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of the
resolution to the Executive Officer of the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation
Commission, who shall then distribute copies in the manner prescribed by law.
Upon motion of Councilmember Roalman seconded by
Council Member Reiss and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Council Member Pinard
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
1
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 17th day of November 1 1992.
Page 4
RESOLUTION NO.8087 (1992 SERIES)
qw�
AYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
Z
No
ry �G�7
� qt� � �.
`V
�� ��
G� ����'
��� ?�
. .....
RESOLUTION N0.8086 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBI_SPO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 1750 (Units 1 & 2),
ACCEPTING A DEED FOR ISLAY HILL PARK AND AN'OPEN -SPACE
EASEMENT FOR ISLAY HILL (Rob Rossi, Subdivider)'
WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning Tract
1750 as contained in Resolution No. 6874 (1990 Series), and
WHEREAS, a grant deeds for "Islay:Hill Park" (fee title) and an
open =space easement for "Islay.Hill" have been offered by the
Subdivider, and
WHEREAS, a covenant to guarantee future installation of standard
frontage improvements and utilities along the Orcutt Road frontages of
the Islay Hill open -space lot (Lot 5) and remainder parcel has been
submitted, and
WHEREAS, all other conditions required per Resolution No. 6874
(1990 Series) for Units 1& 2 of said Tract No. 1750 have been met
and /or will be guaranteed under a Subdivision Agreement (attached
Exhibit "A") and acceptable.surety to guarantee Faithful Performance
($ 1,966,500) and Labor & Materials ($ 983,250), and /or are conditions
of building permits. The surety shall be submitted on, or before,
February 10, 1993, or this resolution shall become null and void. The
final map shall not be recorded until submittal and approval of the
surety, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that final map approval is hereby
granted for Tract No. 1750 (Units 1 & 2) and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to approve the Subdivision Agreement and to accept the
deeds for Islay Hill Park and the Islay Hill open -space easement on
behalf of the City.
R -8086
Resolution No. 8086 (1992 Series)
Page Two
On motion of Council Member Rappa, seconded by Council Member Reiss
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Reiss, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Council Member Pinard
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted. this 10th day of
November, 1992.
ATTEST:
Y CLEjkK D 4 GLADWELL
VII
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED:
dm nistrative Officer
Community Dev went Director
City EEnqineer
A z
Finance Director
P: \WP51 \DReview \T1750 \FinalMap.wp
MAYOR RON DUNIN
Cp .� .�
k�
�� ��
��4�,a
��
.;
,�
EXHIBIT "A"
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is dated this 10th day of November by and between Robin L.
Rossi, herein referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred
to as the "City."
RECITALS
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real property
in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a description
of which is shown on the Final Map of Tract 1750, Units 1 and 2, City of San Luis Obispo,
California, as approved by the City Council on the 10th day of November , 19 92
The Subdivider desires that said Tract No. 1750, Units 1 and 2, be accepted and
approved as a Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis
Obispo (Title 17 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and
It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to install the
improvements as set forth on the plans therefore
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
• In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct and
install the following subdivision improvements in accordance with said subdivision
regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, to wit:.
1. CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS
2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING
3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the property line and
water services to the curb stop.
1
I � �
4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
5. ORNAMENTAL METAL ELECTROLIERS
6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the inspection
and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be required to file
a letter stating that the developer has properly installed all facilities to be provided by
him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to residents upon request.
7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City regulations.
All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated and to the plans and
specifications on file and approved by said City Engineer.
The lines and grades for all of said improvements shall be established by the
Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and specifications.
The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above improvements shall begin
within thirty (30) days from the date of recording of the final map, and that the work shall
be completed within eighteen (18) months of said recording date, unless an extension has
been granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work is delayed by acts of God
or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the Subdivider shall have an additional period of
time equivalent to such period of delay in which to complete such work. Any extension of
time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the Improvement Security filed
pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety waives the provisions of Section
2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California.
No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date of
the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public improvements unless specifically
approved by the City.
2
The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the
Planning Commission and /or the City Council and has paid the necessary fees as indicated
on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2.
The restoration of lost section corners and retracement of section lines within the
Subdivision shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the
Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions Code of the
State of California.
The Subdivider shall submit an instrument of credit or bond approved by, and in favor
of the city of San Luis Obispo, as security for the performance of this agreement, and
conditional upon the faithful performance of this agreement. Such security shall be
submitted on or before February 10, 1993 and is a prerequisite to recordation of the final
map. Failure to provide such security shall terminate this agreement and the final map
approval shall become null and void. Said instrument of credit or bond shall be in the
amount of $1,966,500.00, which is the amount of the estimated cost of said improvements.
Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects in the improvements arising from faulty
workmanship or materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring within
twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with Sections 66499.7 and
66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California, upon final completion and
acceptance of the work, City will release all but 10% of the improvement security, that
amount being deemed sufficient to guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his
obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a period of one year
following the completion and acceptance thereof.
3
r�
n r
Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the City
Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted, accept said improvements according
to said plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic
nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept. said improvements or
waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement.
If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the Subdivider
agrees that City may, at its option, declare the instrument of credit or bond which has been
posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the proceeds
to complete said improvements, or city may complete said improvements and recover the
full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his surety.
The Subdivider agrees to deposit with the City a labor and materials bond in the
amount of 50% of the above described subdivision improvements in accordance with State
law.
Said Subdivider has paid the sum of $36,000.00, from which fee the City will pay the
salary and expenses of an inspector or inspectors to inspect installation of said subdivision
improvements, and for labor and material costs by City to install signs and striping within
the public right -of -way as appropriate and certify that they have been completed in
accordance with the plans and specifications.
Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivision," all plans and
specifications on file with said City Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all other
documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer are
hereby referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of the
Subdivider under this agreement.
M
It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City hereto that
this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the
respective Parties to this agreement.
It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful bidder's contract
unit prices and total bid prices for all of the improvements herein referred to.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MAYOR RON DUNIN
X "'VCLEtAK 'DIANE PLADWELL
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
5
y /
EXHIBIT 1
TRACT 1750
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
1. Subdivider shall pay a fee of $10,000 for intersection controllers (or alternative) prior
to Final Map approval, per Condition 7 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
2. The Subdivider has bonded for a creek protection and restoration plan, per Condition
11 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series), As described Oct 6, 1992 and Oct 7, 1992
letters, the Subdivider and the City agree that this work can be best performed after
the results of the Turtle Study are available. The study is underway, and the work
called for by the Condition can be completed within the time limits for improvements
under this Subdivision Agreement.
3. The Subdivider has bonded for planting of the creek banks adjacent to the turtle
habitat area, per Condition 11 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series). As described Oct
6, 1992 and Oct 7, 1992 letters, the Subdivider and the City agree that this work
can be best performed after the results of the Turtle Study are available. The study
is underway, and the work called for by the Condition can be completed within the
time limits for improvements under this Subdivision Agreement.
4. The Subdivider has elected to initiate the Turtle Study called for in Condition 14, of
Resolution 6874 (1990 series), and is funding the on -going effort.
5. The Subdivider has bonded for revegetation of Tract 1376 Creek Banks in accordance
with the Creek Treatment Concepts Plan approved as part of the tentative map, per
Condition 16 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series). As described Oct 6, 1992 and Oct
7, 1992 letters, the Subdivider and the City agree that this work can be best
performed after the results of the Turtle Study are available. The study is underway,
and the work called for by the Condition can be completed within the time limits for
improvements under this Subdivision Agreement.
6. The Subdivider has paid a sewer lift station fee for Rockview -Tank Farm sewer lift
station of $3,417.67 (8.66 acres x $131.55 x 3), per Conditions 20 and 22 of
Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
7. The Subdivider has paid water acreage fees of $17,320.00 (8.66 acres x $2,000
/acre) prior to recordation of the final map, per Condition 22. of Resolution 6874
(1990 series).
8. The Subdivider is dedicating on the Final Map and, concurrently by separate document
(Grant Deed), lot 4 of the Final. Map (10.76 acres) in fee simple to the City for the
Islay Hill Park site and adjacent creek areas, per Conditions 18 and 36 of Resolution
6874 (1990 series).
L
9. The dedication of the 10.76 acre park site fulfills the purpose of park -in =lieu fees for the
entire Islay area, and no future development within the Islay area (Tract 1750) will be
charged park -in -lieu fees.
10. Upon recordation of the Final Map, the City will return to the property owner (Subdivider)
existing park -in -lieu fees currently on file for the Islay Hill Park ($57,451.68 originally paid
with Tract 1376, plus any applicable interest earned).
11. Upon completion and acceptance of the Park Improvements, the City will return to the
Subdivider, funds currently on file for construction of the Islay Hill Park, previously paid
by the property owners through escrows under Tract 1376.
12. The Subdivider agrees to construct the Islay Hill Park improvements in its entirety within
this phase, as allowed in Condition 35 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series). Surety has been
posted to guarantee the construction, as noted on Exhibit 2. Therefore, the $750 per
dwelling unit to be collected through escrow (prescribed in Condition 35) will not be
collected.
13. The Subdivider has offered an "early" dedication of the Islay Hill Open Space, as allowed
by Condition 38 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series), and is dedicating on the Final Map and,
concurrently by a separate document (Easement Agreement) an Open Space Easement.
for Islay Hill, Lot 5 of the Final Map, in partial compliance with Condition 38 of Resolution
6874 (1990 series).
14. The Subdivider has provided a $7,500.00 payment or.aeceptable surety to the City for
future trail construction, maintenance or improvement of the Islay Hill Open Space as
needed per Condition 38 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
15. The Subdivider has made the notification regarding water shortages for all lots on the
Final Map, per Condition 42. of Resolution 6874 (1990 series):
16. The Subdivider has prepared Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) for lots
1 and 2 of the Final Map, per Condition 44 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
17. Through a separate agreement with the Housing Authority of San Luis Obispo, The
Subdivider has established sale and resale controls for 23 affordable housing units within
Lots 1 and 2 of the Final Map, administered by the Housing Authority, per Condition 45
of Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
18. The Subdivider agrees to offer for sale or other mutually agreeable arrangement, Lot 3
of the Final Map to the Housing Authority, as described in a letter of intent (Exhibit 3), per
Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
19. The Subdivider agrees to install a bus shelter for a transit stop on Tank Farm Road, per
Condition 47 of Resolution 6874 (1990 series).
7
20. The Subdivider shall pay a monumentation guarantee of $4,500.00 to cover the
installation of survey monuments in accordance with the approved map and payment
for same. Said deposit will be released to the Subdivider upon receipt by the City of
a letter from the Engineer /Surveyor indicating he has completed the work and has
been paid.
21. The Subdivider shall obtain approval by the Architectural Review Commission, and
Building permits for the Park improvements, including Restroom, Bridge, Play
equipment etc, prior to any construction of Park facilities.
22. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9, the Subdivider shall defend,
indemnify and hold harmless the City and /or its agents, officers and employees from
any claim, action, or proceeding against the City and /or its agents, officers or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval by the City of this
subdivision, Tract 1750, and .all actions related thereto, including but not limited to
environmental review and adoption of Ordinance No. 1179 (PD 1449 -B).
23. The Subdivider has agreed to Install Orcutt Road improvements when required by the
City, according to a concurrently recorded separate document (Covenant to Install
Public Improvements upon request of City).
No
Return Fees
A. To be returned upon recordation
1. Existing park -in -lieu fees $ 57,451.68' 011 - 0010 - 013 -020
(Paid for Tr 1376)
B. To be returned upon acceptance of improvements
1. Existing Park development fund $ 98,250.00'•2
(1312 Lots x $750 /Lot - Tr 1376)
' Plus any applicable interest.
2 To be verified.
3 Total includes $13,600 paid on 10/28/92 and balance previously paid. Total
check amount is $87,837.67 (Check #106) Heritage Oaks Bank.
J
-'
EXHIBIT 2
TRACT 1750
FEE
AND BOND LIST
"Bonds" - Improvements:
Amount
Form /Surety
Received
1. Faithful Performance (required prior
to recordation)
100% Public Improvements & 15% Infl.
& Contingency
Park Construction
$ 816,500.00
Orcutt Road Widening
$ 92,000.00
Ironbark_ Road Extension
$ 368,000.00
On -Site Improvements
$ 598,000.00
Creek Design & Improvements
$ 92,000.00
TOTAL
$1,966,500.00
2. Labor & Materials (required prior to
recordation)
508 of Faithful Performance
Park Construction
$ 408,250.00
Orcutt Road Widening
$ 46,000.00
Ironbark Road Extension
$ 184,000.00
On -Site Improvements
$ 299,000.00
Creek Design & Improvements
$ 46,000.00
TOTAL
$ 983,250.00
3. Monumentation Trust Deposit
$ 4,500.00
CD #64053
10/28/92
Account No.
Fees - (paid with final map)
A. Sewer Lift Station Fee
$ 3,417.67
052 - 0017 - 074 -030
10/28/92
8.66 AC x $394.65/Ac
B. Water Acreage Fees
$ 17,320.00
050- 0017 - 071 -020
10/28/92
8.66 Ac x $2,000 /Ac
C. Islay Hill Trail Fee
$ 7,500.00
011- 0015 - 058 -120
10/28/92
D. Opticom Device
$ 10,000.00
001 - 0015- 045 -080
10/28/92
10/28/92
E. Plan Checking and Inspection Fees
10/08/92
1. Plan Checking Fee
$ 22,393.113
001 - 0015- 046 -010
04/15/92
2. Construction Inspection Fee
$ 36,000.00
001 - 0015- 048 -030
10/28/92
F. Map Checking Fee
$ 5,350.00
Paid
4/13/92
Return Fees
A. To be returned upon recordation
1. Existing park -in -lieu fees $ 57,451.68' 011 - 0010 - 013 -020
(Paid for Tr 1376)
B. To be returned upon acceptance of improvements
1. Existing Park development fund $ 98,250.00'•2
(1312 Lots x $750 /Lot - Tr 1376)
' Plus any applicable interest.
2 To be verified.
3 Total includes $13,600 paid on 10/28/92 and balance previously paid. Total
check amount is $87,837.67 (Check #106) Heritage Oaks Bank.
J
LF
/1
RESOLUTION NO. 8085 (1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
IN SUPPORT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO IN ESTABLISHMENT
OF A CENTRAL COAST RECYCLING MARKET DEVELOPMENT ZONE
WHEREAS, AB 939 (Sher) requires that each city and county
reduce the waste stream by 25% by 1995, and by 50% by the year
2000; and
WHEREAS, Recycling and market development are key activities
in developing an action plan to successfully accomplish the
statutorily required solid waste diversions; and
WHEREAS, The State of California has established a program
under Title 14, Chapter 4, Resource Conservation Programs, Article
1. Market Development Programs that provides for the establishment
of Recycling Market Development Zones; and
WHEREAS, The County of San Luis Obispo, the County of Santa
Cruz, the County of San Benito, the County of Monterey, and the
Cities. of Watsonville and Hollister intend to make joint
application for the formation of a Central Coast Recycling Market
Development Zone (CCRMDZ); and
WHEREAS, The designation of a CCRMDZ dedicated to the
expansion of secondary materials business enterprises will be
beneficial for market development region -wide; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo desires establishment of
such a regional CCRMDZ; and
WHEREAS, The City of San Luis Obispo finds that the
designation as a Recycling Market Development Zone is necessary in
order to assist in attracting private sector recycling investments
to the area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of San Luis
Obispo does hereby support the application for and development of
a Regional Central Coast Market Development Zone and will complete
actions stated in the City- approved application which will apply to
the City of San Luis Obispo.
R -8085
RESOLUTION NO. 8085
Page 2
Upon motion of Council Member Roalman seconded by
Council Member Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 10th day of
November , 1992
ayor Ron in
ATTEST:
g
i e Gla ell, t-Aty Clerk
APPROVED:
City Ad inistrative Officer
1 At or y
11N,11
_tv /�
j
RESOLUTION NO.8084(1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIDESHARE GRANT
WHEREAS, Rideshare funding allows for the purchase of transit coaches to
enhance transit service; and
WHEREAS, the City accepts the lead in applying for this grant; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is the hub of the consolidated regional
transit system and transit is a priority service of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, all funds identified in the project application are committed to the
project by the eligible applicant; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Development Act funds will be used as the 10% grant
match; and
WHEREAS, if compressed natural gas is used as an alternate fuel, Southern
California Gas has agreed to fund up to $7,500 of the cost; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has the management and financial ability
to accept the legal liabilities associated with this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo approves the application for these Rideshare funds and asks that the Caltrans
Rideshare approve our request and authorizes the Mayor to execute the documents.
R -8084
a
Page 2
Resolution Nogosa (1992 Series)
Upon motion of Council Member Roalman , seconded by
Council Member Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss; and Mayor Dunn
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this loth day of November 1992.
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Admi istrative Officer
hw \rehab.rpt
��
����
� � ����
,�
..
.. 4.- .4 � .�..�� ,
. � '. � .�
1 _ .. _ ..
�,
it
RESOLUTION NO. 8083 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
WHEREAS, the Transit Capital Improvement funding allows for the rehabilitation of
transit coaches to enhance transit service; and
WHEREAS, the City accepts the lead in applying for this grant from the San Luis
Obispo Council of Governments; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is the hub of the consolidated regional
transit system and transit is a priority service of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, all funds identified in the project application are committed to the
project by the eligible applicant; and
WHEREAS, Transportation Development Act funds will be used as the 50% grant
match; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has the management and financial ability
to accept the legal liabilities associated with this project; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments by resolution
recommends that the City be approved in this application request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo approves the application for these TCI funds and asks that the California
Transportation Commission approve our request and authorizes the Mayor to execute the
documents.
R -8083
�1
Page 2
Resolution NcV83 (1991 Series)
Upon motion of Council Member Roalman seconded by
Council Member Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa, Pittard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this loth day of November , 1992.
ATTEST:
�Clerk Iharie /- dwell
APPROVED:
City Adm ristrative Officer
me
hw \rehab.rpt
C
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8082 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.SAN LUIS
OBISPO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF-
SAN LUIS OBISPO AND SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT ZONE 9
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a participant in San
Luis Obispo County.Flood Control District Zone 9; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is eligible for monies
for designated repair and maintenance programs in the City creeks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The certain Agreement attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference between the City of San Luis.
Obispo and San Luis Obispo County Flood Control. District Zone 9 is
hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
Council Member Council Member
On motion of Roalman , seconded by Rappa , and on .
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 10th _ day of
November, 1992.
r
ON DUNIN
.ATTEST:
U Wp/a.� A . %,//..
Y CL ERK s •�
R -8082
m
Resolution. No. 8082 (1992 Series)
Page 2 (Zone 9 cont.)
APPROVED:
trative Officer
Finance
Public Works Director
Streets Manager
z9agr92 -3.wp
k�
��
o �� � C
. !` 1�1
V l� l
:�
'�
0
T
A- 119 -92 -CC
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ZONE 9 AND THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR STREAMBED CLEARING
PROGRAM, GIANT REED ERADICATION PROGRAM,
AND STREAMBED IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
This Agreement entered into the .5k day o ,
1992, between the San Luis Obispo County Flood C n rol and W er
Conservation District, Zone 9 (hereinafter referre to as "Zone 9")
and the City of San Luis Obispo (hereinafter referred to as
"City ");
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, Zone 9 since its inception, has had a streambed,
clearing program which encompasses the mainstreams of the San Luis
Obispo Creek system; and
WHEREAS, certain reaches of these streams lie within the City
of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, the City has also had a streambed clearance program;
and
WHEREAS, the program within the City of San Luis Obispo should
be more economically performed if one agency accomplished the
streambed clearance program; and
WHEREAS, such a cooperative program was successfully carried
out in the last several fiscal years; and
WHEREAS, Zone 9 work has been accomplished with the
cooperation of personnel from the California Conservation Corps;
and
WHEREAS, a continuation of the cooperative program between
Zone 9 and the City could still involve the assistance of the
California Conservation Corps; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that Zone 9 and the City
understand and agree to the services to be performed by each with
respect to the streambed clearing program; and
WHEREAS, a growth of Giant Reeds in the Zone 9 watershed have,
proved to be a flood control problem; and
A- 119 -92 -CC
WHEREAS, appropriate maintenance management leading to the
control and /or eradication of the Giant Reed is necessary; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that Zone 9 and the City.
cooperate on the needed Giant Reed control and /or eradication
program; and
WHEREAS, the Zone 9 Advisory Committee has considered small
improvement projects for erosion control and flood control
benefits; and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the Flood Control Zone
9 and the City to cooperate on the needed small improvement
projects; and
WHEREAS, the 1992 -93 budget appropriation includes $61,000 for
the streambed clearing program and $5,000 for the Giant Reed
Eradication Program.
WHEREAS, the 1992 -93 budget appropriates $150,000 for small
improvement projects.
NOW.. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
conditions, promises and agreements herein set forth, Zone 9 and
City mutually covenant and agree as follows:
STREAMBED CLEARING AND GIANT REED ERADICATION PROGRAM:
1. Zone 9 and City will accomplish streambed clearing within the
San Luis Obispo Creek watershed with the City being
responsible for the prompt and efficient execution of the
entire program within the City limits and Zone 9 being
responsible for the prompt and efficient execution of the.
balance of the program in the unincorporated portion of the
zone.
2. Zone 9 will provide funds to the City for the City to
accomplish the Giant Reed control and /or eradication program
within Zone 9.
_J
3. The City shall be provided not more than $55,000 of the funds
budgeted in Zone 9 in the 1992 -93 fiscal year for the
streambed clearance program and an additional sum of not more
than $2,000 for the Giant Reed control and /or eradication
program.
4. Zone 9 will reimburse the City,, within the limits set forth in
Paragraph 3 above, upon receipt of evidence of work performed
on the basis of monthly statements submitted for payment.
5. All streambed maintenance work provided for by this agreement
shall be done in accordance with the following provisions of
the 1979 Memorandum of Understanding: "Work performed under
this agreement will be conducted within the following streams:
a. San Luis Obispo Creek
b. Lower watershed of Laguna Lake, including Prefumo
Creek but not Sycamore Creek
C. Old Garden Creek to Foothill Boulevard
d. Stenner Creek
e. Brizziolari Creek
Local drainage facilities such as subdivision drains, curbs,
gutters and streets and minor drainage ways not listed above
would be the responsibility of the jurisdiction within which
boundaries the facility lies, or the responsibility of the
private property owner if the facility is not publicly owned.
The streambed maintenance work is envisioned to- generally
involve_ removal of debris which adversely affects the capacity
of the waterways or which might create a greater expense for
its removal at a different location if moved by flood flows at
a later date. It would also involve some streambed vegetation
maintenance to maintain streambed capacity. It would not
include streambed maintenance to the origin of each stream but
primarily include the lower reaches of each stream system. It
would not include abatement of flood hazards under the City's
abatement ordinances. It is also understood that all
streambed maintenance work will be performed under permit from
the State Fish & Game. Permits for work inside the City
limits shall be obtained by the City. Permits for work
outside of the City limits shall be obtained by the County
Flood Control Zone 9."
6. The streambed maintenance program is a flood control program
and City shall use funds provided under this agreement for
only that purpose.
7. Consistent with previous practices, there shall be an annual
reconnaissance survey made by City and County within their
respective jurisdictions of needed works and such shall be
done reasonably before the rainy season in order that the
needed streambed clearing program can be carried out prior to
the rainy season with follow -up work done during the rainy
season as appropriate.
8. For control of vegetation, principally willows, the streambed
maintenance program may be accomplished with the use of State
Fish & Game approved herbicides.
9. Within the City of San Luis Obispo, City shall be responsible
for acquiring any landowner permission needed to accomplish
the streambed clearing program. The City shall be responsible
for acquiring any landowner permission to accomplish the Giant
Reed control and /or eradication program.
10. The City shall act as the lead agency in complying with the
California Environmental Quality Act for work done within the
City limits.
11. Should the streambed clearing program within the City involve
the abatement of nuisances, the removal of trees, or the like,
such shall be performed in accordance with due process of law
under the City's abatement ordinances or State law and shall
be the sole responsibility of City.
SMALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROGRAM:
12. Zone .9 shall provide funding up to an amount of $150,000 for
the City to accomplish the following improvement projects
program:
a. Madonna Road Overpass @ San Luis Obispo Creek -
Remove gravel from the concrete lined banks to
restore to full flow capacity. Estimated cost
$20,000.
b. Prefumo Creek - Laguna Lake - ,Remove major silt and
debris deposits at the point of creek discharge
into Laguna Lake to open up the capacity of the
channel. Estimated cost $50,000.
C. Old Garden Creek @ Mountain View - Repair the floor
in the culvert. Existing floor is failing.
Estimated cost $25,000.
d. Mission Trailer Park @ San Luis Obispo Creek -
Remove obstructions & stabilize the banks that have
encroached into the channel. Estimate cost
$30,000.
e. Upstream Detention Dam Study -. Study the
feasibility of constructing a detention dam or dams
on the upper San Luis Obispo Creek to lessen the
flood hazard to the City & down stream property
owners. Zone 9 to contribute one -half of the cost
up to a maximum of $25,000.
13. City shall provide all design drawings and related services
for the small improvement projects which are to be constructed
and shall arrange for a consultant to perform the study for
the detention dam(s) program. City shall also act as the lead
agency in complying with the California Environmental Quality
Act.
14. Zone 9 shall reimburse City for not more than $150,000 for
said small improvement project program and any expenditures
made by City in excess of that amount shall be paid at the
sole expense of City.
15. Maintenance. City shall maintain all completed works at .no
cost to Zone 9.
16. ownership and Liability. City shall assume ownership and
liability for the completed works.
GENERAL TERMS:
17. Term. This agreement will commence on July 1, 1992 and
terminate on June 30, 1993.
18. Indemnification and Sole Conduct. Each party hereto shall
defend, indemnify and save harmless the other party and other
party's officers, agents and employees from and against all
claims, demands, liability cost, expense, damages, causes of
action, including but not limited to inverse condemnation and
judgments arising out of the sole negligence or sole
intentional acts of the party or its officers, agents or
employees or independent contractors solely responsible to
such party in performing or attempting to perform pursuant to
the provisions of this agreement including both acts and.
omissions to act.
19. Indemnification for joint conduct between Zone 9 and the City.
The City shall defend, indemnify and save.- harmless County, and
its officers, agents and employees from and against any and
all claims, demands, liabilities, costs, expenses, damages,
causes of action including but not limited to inverse
condemnation and judgments arising out of the joint negligence
or joint intentional acts of City and Zone 9 and their
officers, agents, employees or independent contractors
directly responsible to them in performing or attempting to
perform pursuant to the provisions of this agreement including
both acts and omissions and to act provided however that
County shall be solely responsible for the amount of judgment
rendered solely against the Zone 9 or one of its agents or
employees if such judgment is specifically rendered in court
finding of responsibility by Zone 9 or one of its agents or
employees for an act of negligence and City shall not be
required to indemnify Zone 9 for such judgment. Likewise City
shall be solely responsible for any judgment rendered solely
against it or its agents or employees which is based upon acts
or omission by it or one of its agents or employees.
20. Zone 9 agrees to cooperate with City in the defense of any
such claims or litigations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF Zone 9 and City have executed this contract on
the day and year first hereinabove set fort.
By
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Zone 9
of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFWCT:
t
JAMES B. LINDHOLM, JR.
County Counsel
By ' By: _
Date : (*L i `A Z.. Dated:
ATTEST:
dj \fcwcd9.agr.lno
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
i
By:
Mayor, Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
Upon motion of Supervisor. Delany seconded by
Supervisor Blakely and on the following roll call
vote, to wit:
AYES: -Supervisors Delany, Blakely,Laurent, Brackett, Chairperson Ovitt
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINING:. None
the foregoing resolution is hereby Adopted.
HARRY L OVITT
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
FRANCIS Mi. COONEY
Clerk of tli— eBoard of Supervisors-
c\dj\zone9.rsl.(j.mc
STATE OF CALI
FORINTIA,
.County of San Luis Obispo, I ss.
FRANCIS M. - COONEY ----------- - ---- County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors, in and for the County of San Lnis Obispo, State of California, do
hereby certifv*the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of an order made by the Board
of Supervisors, as the same appears spread upon their minute book.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said Board of Supervisors, affixed this --------
day of Jan
------ uary --- ,19__93
--------- FRANCIS M. COONEY
--
(SEAL) Co ty Eark and Ex-Offido Clerk of the Board
Of sup sore
B
JAW
CD-M Deputy Clerk.
RECEPY.970
FEB 2 - 1993
- CUvw�i, cl:uavccrtll�(�z
DEPARTMENT
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- -Tues -- day ------ - - - - -, 19_23 --
PRESENT: Supervisors Laurence L. Laurent, Evelyn Delany, Ruth Brackett,
David Blakely, and Chairperson Harry L}.ovitt
ABSENT. None
RESOLUTION NO. 93 -02
RESOLUTION FOR COOPERATIVE EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS_
WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
The following resolution is now offered and read:
WHEREAS; the budget includes $361,638 for streambed clearance and
small improvement projects; and
WHEREAS, the Zone 9 Advisory Committee has considered.a number of
projects recommended for construction within the City of San Luis
Obispo; and
WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the Flood_ Control Zone 9
and the City of San Luis Obispo to cooperate on the needed erosion .
control projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District, State of California, "and oii behalf of
_.
Flood. Control Zone 9 that the attached agreement calling for the
cooperation between the City of San Luis Obispo County Flood Control
Zone 9 in the construction of erosion control projects is hereby
approved and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is. directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of Flood Control Zone 9.
RESOLUTION NO. 8081(1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ESTABLISHING FEES FOR USING THE COMMUNITY ROOM AND CONFERENCE
ROOM AT THE CITY- COUNTY LIBRARY
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of San Luis Obispo to recoup the costs
associated with allowing the public to use the Community Room and Conference Room
at the City - County Library; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has completed a comprehensive analysis
to determine the costs associated with operating the Community Room and Conference
Room; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that the fees and definitions attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively, be
instituted for using the Community Room and Conference Room at the City - County
Library commencing on January 1, 1993.
Upon motion of Council Member Rappa seconded by
Mayor:.Dunin , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Member Rappa, Mayor Dunin, Council Members Pinard, Reiss,, and
Roalman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the resolution was adopted this 20th day of
ATTEST-I,,,, ;
City CI c
APPR AD-
City A ministrative Officer
dh \fee. res
October 1992,,
MAYOR RON DUNIN
G'
City of San Luis Obispo
CITY /COUNTY LIBRARY ROOM USE
Monday thru Friday
9:00 am to 5`.00 pm
0 to 3 hours
3 to 6 hours
More than 6 hours
Monday thru. Friday
After 5:00 pm
0 to 3 hours
More than 3 hours
Weekends
0 to 3 hours
3 to 6 hours
More than 6 hours
NON - PROFIT GROUPS
Conference
Community
Room
Room
No charge
No charge
$10.00
$25.00
$25.00
$50.00
$10.00
$25.00
$25.00
$50.00
$10.00
$25.00
$15.00
$50.00
$25.00
$100.00
FOR - PROFIT GROUPS
Conference
Community
Room
Room
$25.00
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$50.00
$200.00
$25.00
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$50.00
$200.00
City and County of San Luis Obispo are exempt from fees.
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITY /COUNTY LIBRARY ROOM USE FEES
The following definitions will be used for determining applicable rates for groups or
individuals using the Community Room or Conference Rooms in the City - County Library:
■ Non -Profit - Any organization that possesses tax exempt status from the Internal
Revenue Service or whose primary purpose for existing is community oriented
(e.g., service organizations and recreational clubs) and not for the purpose of
generating profits for itself.
■ For- Profit /Private Uses: (A) Any organization whose primary purpose for existing
is to generate profits for itself, or (B) any private uses of the rooms for social
purposes where the public is not invited to attend (e.g., private social parties or
weddings).
y7a1:11��
V'
� . � ��
v �
�� � ��� j�
S�
��
'U
RESOLUTION N0.8080(1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL CLAIM
FOR MONEY FROM THE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
1. To approve the 1992 -93 annual claim for local transportation funds.
2. To authorize the City Administrative Officer to execute the appropriate claim form.
3. To direct the City Clerk to forward one executed copy of the claim and a certified
copy of this resolution to:
San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
On motion of Council Member Rappa seconded by
Council Member Roalman and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss,.and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of
October 1992.
ATTEST:
i Jerk lane GlAdwell
AL;;�
Finance Director
hw \claim.rpt
i . "Atto f e
i :1:1
ANNUAL CLAIM
FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AND
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS
CLAIM # TDA -SLO- 92_/_93
FISCAL YEAR 199 93
TO: San Luis Obispo Council of Governments
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
FROM: CLAIMANT: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADDRESS:
CITY:
CONTACT:
P.O. BOX 8100
SAN LUIS OBISPO ZIP CODE: 93403
HARRY WATSON, TRANSIT MGR PHONE: 781 -7121
This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests,
in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971, as amended and applicable rules and
regulations, that an allocation be made for the purposes and in the respective amounts as
described in the attached Project and Financial Plan claim form.
a) Annual (LTF) Apportionment $ 776,262
1) Annual Bicycle /Ped. Apportionment $ 15,705
b) Annual (STA) Funds $ 3,767
1) Operator Revenues $ 3,767
2) Apportionment $ 0
TOTAL FUNDS BEING CLAIMED ARE $ 780,029
Claimant Signature: -�
Title: C ADMINISTRATIVE. °OFFICER
Date: October '27_ 1992
This claim was approved by San. Luis Obispo Council of Governments at their August 5, 1992
meeting, by Resolution No. 92 -13.
Ronald L. De Carli, Executive Director Date
c:\CWM3\ ...
� 121
CD
RESOLUTION NO. 8079 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION AND
APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A GUEST QUARTERS / WORK STUDIO TO BE
CONSTRUCTED ABOVE A SEPARATE GARAGE AT 1857 CONEJO AVENUE.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicants' request A 138-
92, the appellants' statements, and the Planning Commission's
action, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the
following findings:
1. The proposed design will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, and welfare of persons living or working in the
vicinity.
2. The proposed design is consistent with Condition 1 of Use
Permit U0914, as it pertains to Tract 940, of which the
project site is a parcel. The condition states:
Each lot may be developed with one
single- family residence, subject
to all applicable Zoning Ordinance
and Building Code Regulations.
3. The proposed use conforms to the General Plan and the
Zoning Ordinance.
4. The proposed use is categorically exempt from environmental
review (CEQA Section 15303).
SECTION 2. Conditions.
A multi- structure residence is hereby approved, subject to the
following conditions:
R 8079
i�
C' _J
Resolution No.--.807 9
Page 2
1. The applicant shall submit a covenant to the community
Development Department for review, approval, and
recordation, which limits the density of the property to
one dwelling unit, consistent with Use Permit U0914 and the
Zoning Regulations.
2. The single- family residence shall be housed in no more than
two structures.
on motion of - Councilmember . Roalman.
seconded by Councilmember Rappa and on the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Pinard
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day
of October 1992.
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
Gladwe
`6,ity Ad4inistrative Officer
Community
opment Director
IV
0 t.40
RESOLUTION NO. 8078 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY
AN APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S INTERPRETATION
REGARDING RETAINING SUBSIDIZED HOUSING
AT THE VILLAGE SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT
LOCATED AT 55 BROAD STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after
consideration of public testimony, PD 1266 conditions of approval,
the appellant's statements, and the Community Development
Director's determination, determines that it is not necessary for
the property owner of the Village to file a planned development
amendment in order to withdraw from participation in a Section 8
rental subsidy program at the senior housing project, based on the
following finding:
1. The original conditions of approval for Planned Development
PD 1266 did not mandate that the property owner of the
complex participate in low income or rental. subsidy
assistance programs.,
2. The City cannot require continued participation in programs
voluntarily entered into by property owners at the Village.
SECTION 2. Action /Condition. That this Council hereby
denies the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision, upholding
the Community Development Director's interpretation.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman
seconded by Councilmember Reiss and on the following roll
call vote:
R 8078
Resolution No. 8078 (1992 Series)
Page 2
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss, Pinard, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Rappa
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day
of October , 1992.
ayor Ron Dunin
ATTEST:
c
C y Clerk Diane Gladwell
APPROVED:
City Ad inistrative Officer
m IN F
ilro
Community Develipment Director
!R4 � �,
RESOLUTION NO. 8077 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S ACTION
TO ISSUE A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
CREEK REPAIRS.PROPOSED ADJACENT TO LAGUNA LAKE MOBILE ESTATES
LOCATED AT 1801 PREFUMO CANYON ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findincts. That this Council, after
consideration of public testimony, the applicants' proposed creek
repair plans, the appellants' statements, the Community Development
Director's action, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes
the following findings:
1. The proposed creek repairs provide an environmentally -
sensitive approach to stabilizing creek banks.
2. The proposed creek repairs will not have a negative impact
on the environment with the incorporation of required
mitigation measures.
SECTION 2. Action/ Condition. That this Council hereby
denies the appeal of the adequacy of the initial study of
environmental impact, upholding the Community Development
Director's decision to issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
approving proposed creek repairs with the following condition:
1. A public hearing before the City Council shall be held in
six months to determine whether further creek repairs are
needed.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman
seconded by
call vote:
Councilmember Reiss
, and on the following roll
R 8077
Resolution No.8077 (1992 Series)
Page 2
n
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Reiss, Pinard, and Rappa
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day
of
October
1992.
r'" o unin ayor
ATTEST:
i Clerk Diane Gladwell
APPROVED:
U
City Adoinistrative Officer
i At or
Community Devel/pment Director
J Q
k)
L� 1
��
0AE
M �`�
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. 0. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
�1\
RESOLUTION NO. 8076 (1992 Series.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
.FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT MILL STREETp BETWEEN NIPOMO STREET
AND BROAD STREET, IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE
PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING ITS ABANDONMENT, SUBJECT TO
RESERVATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND OTHER CONDITIONS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the public hearing duly held on
October 61 1992, pursuant to Section 8300 et seq. of'the
California Streets and Highways Code, this Council.finds and
determines that Mill Street, between Nipomo Street and Broad
Street, as described and shown on the map marked Exhibit "A ",
attached hereto and incorporated herein, is not necessary for
present or future public street purposes. .
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of said
right -of -way subject to.:
A. Reservation of an easement for public utilities over the
entire 60 ft. wide right of way.
B. Reservation of easements for public.sanitary sewer and
water mains and appurtenances thereto, drainage, . emergency
access and public pedestrian and bicycle purposes, over the
abandoned right of way, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ".
R 8076
Resolution No. 8076 (1992 Series)
Page Two.
C. Recordation of a 20 ft. wide common.driveway easement
agreement which provides for common driveway access in
perpetuity to parcels formerly served by the right of way, to
the satisfaction of the Community Development Director,
D. Installation of standard frontage improvements (curb,
gutter, sidewalk and driveway ramp) along with necessary
drainage facilities, along the Broad Street frontage, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
E. Installation of public drainage, pedestrian and bikeway
improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works and
Community Development Directors.
F. Recordation of lot line adjustment, via a Certificate of
Compliance, which combines all lots of record, to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
G. Items C. through F. must be met within one (1) year of this
date. Otherwise, this resolution will expire and will be null
and void. The easement reservations may be modified by the
City Engineer (upon a determination by the City Engineer that
the full easement reservation is not needed for various public
easements and public access) prior to recordation of this
resolution, subject to approval of plans and installation of
such improvements that would allow for such modifications.
SECTION 3. Upon notification by the City Engineer that the
conditions prescribed in Section 2 have been met, the City Clerk
�I
Resolution No. 8076 (1992 Series)
Page Three
shall cause a certified copy of this Order of Abandonment, duly
attested under the seal of the City, to be recorded.in the Office
of the Recorder of the County of San Luis Obispo.
On motion of Councilmember Rappa, seconded by Mayor Dunin ,
and on the following roll call vote,
AYES:. Councilmember Rappa, Mayor Dunin, and Councilmember Reiss
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: Councilmember P.inard
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of
October , 1992.
t MAYOR RON IN
EST:
t
C T CLERK DkANECCZADWELL
APPROVED AS TO • 11
ty 4dmi;-i"tive Officer
ity Dov4lopment Director
P:�jerry\MiKAbn2.wp
00,
Tim.
Irl
J!
r
70'
101
0
evo'.. I
-5T
NW Corner bo
13Z/ <- 34-
Legal b'escr'ipt'ion of Mill Street Ak4nd"onment
That certain portion of Mill Street right of way, _60 feet wide, between the
prolongation of the westerly line of Broad Street and a line described as
follows:
Beginning at the northwesterly corner of Block 36 of the Town of San Luis
Obispo as recorded in Bk. A of Maps at Page 168, recorded on May 1, 1878 inL
the office of the San Luis Obispo Counmty Recorder; thence, northerly to
the most southerly corner of Tract 522, as recorded in Book 8 of Maps at
Page 60, in the office of the San Luis Obispo county Recorder.
Subject to reservation of the following easements:
1. The entire R/W for public utilities, sewer, water and drainage.
2. The NWIly half of R/W for public pedestrian, bikeway and emergency
access purposes.
3. The NE'ly 195 ft. of the SEIly 20 ft. of the NWIly half of R/W for
common driveway purposes for Tract No. 522.
4e=x111,a1 T 'A
Cl =yg ty 0�
IgImjmmJrA san IUIS 0131SPo
ro A1140M> 'a r.
JV
il�q q
ANP
Resolution No. 8075 (1992 Series)
aty Of son wis osispo
Resotution.
of APPIZeClAtion
Expressing the City's thanks and appreciation to Ron Dunin for his many contributions
and dedicated service to the City of San Luis Obispo and its citizens
WHEREAS, Romuald JaaJozef Dunin Horkawicz, AKA Mayor Ron, has had a long and distinguished
career with the City of San Luis Obispo as Councilmember, Vice- Mayor, and Mayor for 15+ years beginning
April 1, 1971; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Ron, on literally hundreds of occasions has invited citizens from all walks of life to
meet with him, to exchange differing ideas, and generally share in his deeply held belief that neighbors should
work together and that government should be accessible to all people; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Ron has served with /survived or guided 7 City Councils, 4 City Administrative
Officers, attended more than 850 Council meetings,' and participated in thousands of hours of community
functions; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Ron has served as a founding father of Obispo Beautiful, SLO Downtown
Association (BIA), Motel /Hotel Association, Performing Arts Center, and has served on numerous city and
county committees and commissions including SLO County.Flood Control (Zone 9), LAFCO, Promotional
Coordinating Committee, Chamber of Commerce, Visitors & Convention Bureau, and many others;
WHEREAS, Mayor Ron has had a distinguished military career serving, and receiving decorations from,
the Polish Forces in the United Kingdom, France, Poland, and Britain, and receiving the Medal of Merit from
the State of California National Guard, the Bronze Good Citizenship Medal from the Sons of the American
Revolution, the Honorary Life Membership from the Second Marine Division Association, and acts as the
Military Commander for the City of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, Mayor Ron has been awarded numerous citations including Citizen of the Year, El
Presidente of La Fiesta del Encanto, Golden Key National Honor Society, Associated Students of Cal Poly, Area
Agency on Aging, Drug & Alcohol Prevention, Boy Scouts, Law Enforcement, Firefighters, Health Organizations,
and many others;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does
hereby express its gratitude and. appreciation to Ron Dunin and gives its best wishes to him and his family for
a blessed and well deserved retirement.
On motion of Vice-Mayor Rpppa, seconded by Councilman Reiss, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:. Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard and Roalman
.NOES: None
ABSENT: Mayor Dunin
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of October, 1992
Pam Voges, City Clerk Penny Rappa, Mayor Pro-tent
P Adl= 17 FYI
caungp ❑ CODDIR.
A DM
CAO - 11 mprr m
152 .
RESOLUTION NO. 8074 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR FUNDING UNDER
THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM, THE EXECUTION OF A
STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY AMENDMENTS
THERETO, AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City. of San Luis Obispo, a political subdivision
of the State of California, wishes to apply for and receive an
allocation of funds through the HOME Investment Partnerships
Program (hereinafter referred to as "HOME"); and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (hereinafter referred to as the "Department ") has
issued a Notice of Funding Availability for the HOME program and is
authorized to approve funding allocations which will be made
available directly through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II
of the Cranston- Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990,
the implementing regulations set forth in title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 92, and Title 25 of the California Code
of Regulations commencing with section 8200; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo wishes to submit an
application to obtain from the department an allocation of HOME
funds;
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The City of San Luis Obispo shall submit
to the Department an application to participate in the HOME program
R -8074
Council Resolution No. 8074 (1992 Series)
Page 2
which will request a funding allocation for the acquisition of 48
existing apartments located at 3350 Bullock Lane, in the City of
San Luis Obispo, to allow the renovation and preservation of the
apartments as low and very low- income rental housing.
SECTION 2. Grant Application and Funding. If the application
for funding is approved, the City of San Luis Obispo hereby agrees
to use the HOME funds for eligible activities An the manner
presented in the application as approved by the Department and in
accordance with applicable regulations.
SECTION 3. Authorization to execute grant application and
related documents. The City Council authorizes the City
Administrative Officer to execute in the name of the City of San
Luis Obispo, the application, the Standard Agreement,and all other
documents required by the department or HUD for participation in
the HOME program, and any amendments thereto.
On motion of Council Member Ranna , seconded by
.Council Member Roalman , and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 20th
day of October , 1992.
Council Resolution No. 8074 (1992 Series)
Page 3
Mayor Ron Dunin
The foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the San
Luis Obispo City Council adopted at a duly convened meeting on the
date above - mentioned, which has not been altered; amended, or
repealed.
ATTEST:
ane Gladwell, City Clerk''
APPROVED:
tive Officer
�oj
(k,
i
RESOLUTION NO. 8073 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO IMPLEMENTING A LOW INCOME ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM FOR CITY RESIDENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted improving customer services as a key
objective for 1991 -93; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has identified the development of a program to assist
low income customers in affording City utilities as a primary goal for 1991 -93; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed that the program consist of a 15% rate
reduction for customers receiving Federal and State aid, a one -time assist for customers who
are experiencing financial difficulty, and assistance in retrofitting and maintaining
conservative water usage within their homes;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo finds and
resolves that a program to assist low income customers which consists of Rate Assistance,
Retro -fit Assistance, and an Assistance Fund be established.
R 8073
,; i��
i �' a
Councilmember Councilmember
Upon motion of Rappa , seconded by Roalman and on the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this
ATTEST:
D' ne Gladweli; ity Clerk
APPROVED:
City ministrative Officer
Director of Finance
/� /• �. _ /
Director of Utilities
i %
6th
day of October
Mayor Ron Dunin
1992.
�� q� �
��� o���
��
�I
RESOLUTION NO.8072 (1992 Series)
CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT OF CENTRAL COAST SALMON
ENHANCEMENT'S VOLUNTEER CREEK CLEAN -UP
SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 17, 1992
WHEREAS, creeks provide water to animals, habitat for plants,
fish, birds and other animals, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo considers the creeks
within and around the community a valuable natural resource, one
that should not be marred by trash, and
WHEREAS, creeks, when properly maintained add to the City's
scenic quality and add value to individual properties, and
WHEREAS, the City has an interest in maintaining local creeks
in a clean manner to protect against potential flooding, and
WHEREAS,. the City must spend monies to maintain local creeks,
and thus volunteer projects which perform maintenance are an asset
to the City, and
WHEREAS, such volunteer events not only improve the quality of
an area but also provide community participation and education, and
WHEREAS, the Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Inc., creek
clean -up project would remove trash from San Luis Obispo.creeks,
and
WHEREAS, the City role as a co- sponsor would be to allow: (a)
creek clean -up volunteers to utilize the City's creek maintenance
easements, and (2) CCSE to use the City's name to advertise the
creek clean -up event,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo does hereby agree to co- sponsor the Central Coast
R -8072
Resolution No. 8072
Page 2
(1992 Series)
Salmon Enhancement's creek clean -up day scheduled for October 17,
1992.
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa ,
seconded by Councilman. Roalman and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Roalman, Pinard, Reiss„ and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of
October , 1992.
ATTEST:
ldG'- l�t�u�
Cat Clerk Dia Gladwell
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
Community DeVeA opment Director
�E ��,
.�.
C � �;����
G ��;
��
.�:, .
_ . _ ._a.� _ �,1,
d
DATE - ITEM
RESOLUTION NO. 8071 (1992 SERIES)
city of sAn luis OBisw
Resotution
of AppizeciAtion
expressing the city's gratitude to Bill Heiland
for his many contributions and dedicated service to
the City of San Luis Obispo
WHEREAS, Bill Hetland has had a long and distinguished career with the City of San
Luis Obispo serving as Utilities Director from August 29, 1983 to October 2 1992;
WHEREAS, Bill was the fist Utilities Director for the City of San Luis Obispo and has
established a professional image and a very strong sense of "team" for the department, and
WHEREAS, Bill's professional management abilities have allowed die personnel of the
City Utilities Department and the citizens of the City to prosper in an atmosphere of high
morale, trust, and proficiency, and
WHEREAS, Bill has significant accomplishments to his credit including development of
a $32 million Wastewater Management Program, a Groundwater Program to provide up to 40%
of the City's water needs, development of a Water Conservation Program resultiq in over 45%
conservation during the drought, and numerous other water supply projects and programs;
WHEREAS, Bill was in San Francisco during the October 1989 earthquake and survived;
and
WHEREAS, the drought, though unpleasant for most, provided Bill with the assurance
of 'full employment" and a number of opportunities to build his resume (which we now know
he obviously took advantage of); and
WHEREAS, Bill, has decided to part the central coast for "greener" pastures in Fresno,
to seek greater professional challenges, such as convincing Fresno citizens that the installation
of water meters is a pretty good idea
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council wishes to express its
gratitude for Ids numerous accomplishments and outstanding performance and sends Bill best
wishes for success in his future endeavors.
On motion of _ seconded by
and on the following roll call vote: -
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT-
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted thus 22nd day of September, 1992
ATTESTED BY.•
Pam Voges, City Clerk
Mayor Ron Dunin
C READFII.E
❑ FYI
CAD DIR.
R4. DIR.
FMEC HMF
Fw DIR.
PouaCH
REC DIX
o-iz�
G
RESOLUTION NO._ 8070 (1992 Series)
City Of San WIS OBISPO
Resotution
Of ADDR60-AtIon
EXPRESSING IL CKS GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION TO
C17Y CLERK PAM VOGES FOR HER LONG AND
DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE CITYAND ITS CITIZENS
WHEREAS, Pam Voges has served the City of San Luis Obispo for 17 years, beginning
her career as Secretary in the City Clerk's Office;
WHEREAS, recognizing her exceptional capabilities, the City Council appointed her City
Clerk on June 9, 1981, and site has now served for more than 11 years in that position;
WHEREAS, Pam has attended over 600 Council meetings,, attested to countless
resolutions and ordinances, given the oath of office to scores of City officials, and conducted
numerous regular and special elections;
WHEREAS, Pam has attained the title of Certified Municipal Clerk and is an active
member of the International Institute of Municipal Clerks; City Clerks' Association of
California, Association of Records Managers and Administrators and Gold Coast City Clerks'
Association;
WHEREAS, Pam has demonstrated her commitment to providing superioi'public service
by faithfully working with members of the public to resolve their issues;
WHEREAS, Pam was one of the first two women to serve on the City Management
Team and is respected and admired for her diligence and hard work by her peers, co- workers,
staff and citizens;
WHEREAS, during her career with the City, Pam has been known as "Super Clerk,"
reflecting on her bearing, ability and knowledge
WHEREAS, at Management Team retreats, Pam many times displayed her remarkable
skill and enthusiasm as a demon poker and "G. U.T.S. "player,
WHEREAS, having successfully fulfilled many personal and professional goals, Pam is
embarking on exciting adventures with her husband Larry Ruggles as they travel the country on
his business projects;
WHEREAS, Pam will leave many friends who will miss her wit, affection and wise
counsel
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Council wishes to express its
gratitude to Pam Voges for the service she has performed and the contributions she has made
as City Clerk
On motion of second by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT.•
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 22nd day of September, 1992.
ATTESTED BY.•
Kim Condon, Assistant City Clerk
Mayor Ron Dunin
COMESTO:
❑ • tx,w
❑ FYI
e'c«�t
❑ mDt>IL
d
to
❑ M oiR
❑ MOW
��ACAO
RN
ATTOEY
❑ Fvtwt.
g/CLEwowc.
D rotstEC K
MC MT.
152b
i
RESOLUTION NO. 806(1992 Series)
ADOPTION OF THE MULTIHAZARD EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo shall provide for the organization, staffing and
allocation of resources to protect, the citizens of San Luis Obispo from the ravages of earthquake,.
Nuclear Power Plant accidents, hazardous materials spills or releases, storms, floods or fires, and
WHEREAS, Section 2.24.080 of the City's Municipal Code requires the development of an
emergency response plan, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo Fire Department has developed such a plan.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
does hereby adopt the Multihazard Emergency Response Plan.
Upon motion of Councilmember Rappa ,seconded by Councilmember
Reiss
and on the following roll call voter
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Reiss, Pinard, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15th day of September , 1992.
vrdl7.doc
ATTEST:
Pam loges, City Clerl�
�ly A ministrative Officer
vrdl7.doc
Ron Dunin, Mayor
o/ �1 �� I
1rlj�J
U
o
RESOLUTION NO. 8068 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO
NEGOTIATE A NEW AMBULANCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITIES AND THE COUNTY AND
DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGERS /FIRE CHIEFS
COMMITTEE ON AMBULANCE AS THE BARGAINING
GROUP FOR THE CITIES.
WHEREAS, the cities and the county entered into a contract for the regulation of ambulance
services countywide in 1976; and
WHEREAS, the cities in February, 1989, expressed a strong interest to the county in seeing
those contracts modified to provide for local input, improved levels of service and performance
standards; and
WHEREAS, the cities and county staff entered into discussions on this issue with no resolution
to the identified problems; and
WHEREAS, the seven cities have all voided the 1976 ambulance services contract between the
cities and the county; and
WHEREAS, the cities desire a system -wide approach to providing emergency medical services;
and
WHEREAS, numerous problems have been identified by the Cities, Grand Jury and professional
consultants paid for by the county and ambulance providers; and
WHEREAS, the Health and Safety Code Section 1797.204 defines an emergency medical system
as an organized pattern of readiness of response services based on public and private agreements;
and
WHEREAS, the Health and Safety Code Section 1797.252 states, "The local EMS Agency
(County) shall, consistent with such plan, coordinate and facilitate arrangements necessary to
develop the Emergency Medical Service system."
WHEREAS, the cities desire to see a Joint Powers Agency, or some other appropriate
mechanism established to involve cities in oversight, direction and modification of ambulance
services countywide; and
WHEREAS, the cities desire to participate in the decision - making process, as it pertains to the
providing of pre - hospital medical care, to their residents.
:I.:
4 '
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo requests the County
Board of Supervisors to assign and direct County staff to negotiate in good faith with the cities in an
attempt to resolve the long - standing problems which exist with the delivery of pre - hospital medical
care countywide.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo is committed through the joint
efforts of the City Managers /Fire Chiefs committee on ambulance services, to resolve problems
associated with the provision of ambulance services within the cities and county.
Upon motion of Councilmember Reiss ,seconded by Councilmember Pinard
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Pinard, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this
15th day of September , 1992.
Ron Dunin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pam oges ,City k
APPROVED:
John Dun , City Administrative Officer
� � � �i
Gtr` �,
�6� }v\
��J
8067
RESOLUTION NO. (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION CLEAN AIR AND TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT ACT NON -URBAN COUNTY
. TRANSIT PROJECT FUNDING
WHEREAS, the Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act of 1990 allows for
the purchase of transit coaches to enhance transit service; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is the hub of the consolidated regional
transit system and transit is a priority service of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Policy 19 of the CTC Proposition 116 Non -Urban County Program
Policy Guidelines allows San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG), subject to
CTC approval to transfer its applicant status to another public agency that accepts the
rights and responsibilities to implement and deliver the project; and
WHEREAS, SLOCOG by resolution, has recommended that the City of San Luis
Obispo be approved as the eligible applicant; and
WHEREAS, all funds identified in the project application are committed to the
project by the eligible applicant; and
WHEREAS, other funding sources will be utilized to complete this project if the
project costs exceed those identified int he application including funds from the Gas
Company if compressed natural gas alternate fuel engines are used; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has the financial and institutional ability to
accept the legal liabilities associated with this project; and
WHEREAS, Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Act (CATIA) funds allocated
will not supplant funds previously planned, programmed or approved for the purpose for
which the CATIA funds were awarded, and
R -8067
n
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 8067 (1992 SERIES)
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Area Coordinating Council by resolution
recommends that the City be approved in this application request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo accepts from SLOCOG the transfer of applicant status and all management and
financial responsibilities of the project.
Upon motion of Councilmember Roalman seconded by
Councilmember Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 15th day of September , 1992.
�M-5 or Ron Dunin
ATTES b,
Pam Ages, City Cle
i o y
\hw \app.rpt
a�f(� o
0
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8066 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DECLARING TWO VEHICLES
AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby declares that all items of property
listed in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by reference are surplus property.
SECTION 2. Disposal of the property shall be made as determined by sale at public auction
or by another method of disposal in accordance with the City's surplus property policy as determined
by the Director of Finance to be in the best interest of the City.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman ,seconded
by Councilmember Rappa , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: rouncilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted the 15 day of September ,1992.
-Mayor Ron Dunin
APPROVED:
City Ad 'nistrative Officer
SURPLUS PROPERTY LIST - VEHICLES
........................................ ...............................
City Vehicle Year
Number. `PurCli sed Fl
6409 1964 Fire Van Pelt Pumper 6834 $8,000
8702 1986 Fire Buick Century Sedan 1475 $1,500
RESOLUTION NO. 8065 (1992 Series)
.A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) REGARDING THE
RELINQUISHMENT OF A PORTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 227
TO THE CITY AND THE RELOCATION OF STATE HIGHWAY 227
TO ANEW ALIGNMENT.
SECTION 1. That certain agreement attached hereto marked
"Exhibit. All and incorporated herein by reference between the City
of San Luis Obispo and the State of California (Department of
Transportation), wherein the State of California and the City of
San Luis Obispo agree to realign State Highway 227 is hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the same.
SECTION 2. The cooperative agreement attached hereto marked
"Exhibit All authorizes the State to relinquish a portion of State
Highway 227 beginning at the intersection of Broad and South
Streets and thence running northerly along Broad Street to the
intersection of Higuera Street, and on Higuera and Marsh Streets
(a one -way couplet between Broad Street and U.S. Highway 101) and
will establish a new route for State Highway 227 beginning at the
intersection of Broad and South Streets and running westerly on
South Street to Higuera, and then southerly on Higuera Street to
Madonna Road, and westerly on Madonna Road to the southbound off-
ramps of Highway 101.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall furnish copies of this
resolution and copies of the executed agreement approved by it
to: State of California (Department of Transportation) and the
City Engineer.
R -8065
Resolution No. 8065
Page Two.
(1992 Series)
On motion of Councilmember Roalman , seconded by Councilmember
Rappa , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day
of September , 1992.
MAYOR RON DUNIN
W.
APPROVED:
City dministrative Officer
City �Iineer
wap3 /stateagr
by
P
05 -SLO- 227- R12.75/R13.97
Exchange of City Streets
and State Highway
District Agreement #5CA9209
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
A- 102 -92 -CC
THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON /5; � /� 2 is
between the STATE of CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its
Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE ", and
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a
body politic and a municipal
corporation of the State of
California, referred to herein
as "CITY"
RECITALS
(1) State and City are authorized to enter into a
Cooperative Agreement under Streets and Highways Code Section 73,
providing for the relinquishment of any portion of a State .
highway to a City.
(2) CITY is willing to accept relinquishment of that
Portion of existing Route 227 along Broad Street, Higuera.Street
and Marsh Street between South Street and Route 101 at the Marsh
CAL^ Street Separation Bridge No. 49 -08.
C1 (3) STATE is willing to relinquish the Above'described
portion of Route 227 and to recommend to the California ,
Transportation Commission (CTC) the adoption as part of 'kbute
227, that portion.South Street between Broad Street and Higuera
Street., Higuera Street between South Street and Madonna Road,
plus Madonna Road from Higuera Street to its junction with the
Route 101 Southbound Ramps near the Madonna Road overcrossing
Bridge No. 49 -190. (See Exhibit A).
(4) STATE will benefit in a reduction of maintenance
costs, both roadway and signals, and in vacating a section that
is difficult to maintain because of variable roadway width,
parking and heavy commercial and tourist traffic. Permit
applications will also reduce in number and complexity. The
proposed route will provide better. service for state highway
purposes.
(5) CITY will be better served by being able to
convert the existing route to better accommodate tourists,
shoppers and the Farmer's Market. CITY's desire for control of
the existing route is to reflect the needs of the community of
San Luis Obispo.
A- 102 -92 -CC
7
District Agreement # 5CA9209
(6) This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) relating to the aforementioned portion of
State Route 227.
(7) The parties hereto desire to define herein the
terms and conditions under which the City streets will be adopted
as a new State highway and the existing State highway will be
relinquished.
SECTION I
CITY AGREES:
(1.) After approval of relinquishment and adoption by
the California Transportation Commission, to accept and maintain
the relinquished portion of Route 227 described in RECITALS,
ARTICLE (2) above, including maintenance and operation of
existing traffic signals and lighting.
(2) To concur in STATE's recommendation to the
California Transportation Commission that STATE adopt as a State
highway that portion of the City Street System described in
RECITALS, ARTICLE (3) above.
(3) Execution of this Agreement constitutes its waiver
of the ninety (90) days' notice of "Intention to Relinquish"
requirement contained in Section 73 of the Streets and Highways
Code.
SECTION. -II
STATE AGREES:
(1) To recommend. California Transportation Commission
adoption as a. State highway of that portion of the City Streets
described in RECITALS, ARTICLE (3) above.
(2) Subsequent to adoption, to accept and maintain
that portion of new State Route 227 as previously described.
(3) After approval of relinquishment by the California
Transportation Commission of that portion Route 227 previously
described, all existing STATE owned traffic signals and lighting
along the relinquished portion of State Route 227 will become the
property and responsibility of CITY.
(4) To remove or modify any guide signs on the relinquished .
section of Superseded Route 227 inappropriate by said
relinquishment.
Page 2 of 4 F '.
IT IS.MUTUALLY AGREED:
District Agreement # 5CA9209
SECTION III
(1) All obligation of STATE under the terms of this
Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the
Legislature and the allocation of resources and Route Adoption,
and relinquishment by the California Transportation Commission.
(2) After adoption and relinquishment by the
California Transportation Commission, transfer of
responsibilities for maintenance and operation of the
relinquished and adopted routes will be accomplished on a date
mutually agreed to by STATE and CITY.
(3) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof
is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reasons
of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all
officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every
name, kind, and description brought for or on account of injury
(as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason
of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
CITY under this Agreement.
(4) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof
is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reasons
of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in
connection with any work,..authority or jurisdiction delegated to
STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895..4, State shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless the CITY, all officers and
employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind
and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined
in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reasons of
anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
STATE under this Agreement.
(5) Each party shall issue Encroachment Permits, at no
cost, to the other party, as required, to accomplish highway
adoption and relinquishment activities.
Page 3 of 4
4
District Agreement # 5CA9209
(6) This Agreement may be terminated or provisions
contained herein may be altered, changed or amended by mutual
consent of the parties hereto.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation
By %\,Q
('r District Director
°Date: 9 -30 -%Z
Approved as to Form and Procedure
0
Attorney, Department of
Transportation
Date: ko t6 l C
L
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Attes,=
Clerk
Date:
Approved as to Content
Certified as to Funds and Procedure
Public orks Director
Dis ccou ing Administrator
Date:
Date: Ci a- C, - G`)- Approved as to Form
CC
COD
x
By C � llMllOn 6i!e`'.6
i ` A to e
Date: 1911 l e3 &n fi b 199a
7
Page 4 of 4
7
,.� _...� IL,
Olt
. 8 MAC
Wo
I
LAMM
qE a
L �
V
{� W��
Ave.
AsS _qv f ebi
gj
o ����„�.�� js°7S. •Pa uea na � MM_ • •� � v i
lwloA8
La no
a — '
o
• Sr 6 map"" W ..
NJ
uluez
ire\
1
I •t
. �
��
�. �, .,.\
�il�a
ape
t5.
iv
3 t
'
�
=ti7Qai$ a wYM � •� � �
ia91t$
a 1 �
,- 'H1A05
• _b O +S •
• _1 yu0J Ob � � ��
a
of � /�,• ^� .. b� ..__. _..,
•.. •'•1.l I 1•'.: .. ••yNi �i +. /ii�ti~•..4i J/Y Y.: ii
.•. Exhibr
n
The City of San Luis Obispo has requested a transfer for a
portion of state Highway 227 within City limits. The purpose of
this report is to review the request and discuss the advantages
and disadvantages of the proposed transfer.
Ml [ f • U•1•
Current routing of Highway 227 carries it through the central
business district and "Old Toxin ". Higuera Street and Marsh
Street each comprise a leg of a two street one way couplet.
Broad Street is a narrow two lane conventional highway with
parking on both sides through old Town (see attached "B" for
existing and proposed locations).
Ban Luis Obispo is well known for its mild weather, tourist
attractions and Parmer's Market. The Farmer's Market is held
every Thursday evening. one block of Broad Street and one block
of Higuerm (both Highway 227) are closed to through traffic
between the hours of 5:00 PH and 9:00 PM_ As Highway 227 is
mainly a part of the local street system, traffic is detoured
around the Farmer's Market via other city streets.
Headquarters Permit Branch rejected a similar request gor a
weekly Farmer's Market in District 4. District a then cited San
Luis Obispo's Farmer's Market and requested that the same
conditions be allowed them. District 5 was then notified that
the Farmer's Market was in violation of Sections 68295, Article 2
and Section 731, Article 2.5 of Chapter 3 of the Statutes.
MIS NdwMatom Erg Section Tat. the dwwhnent may issue pemr8s k =ME= mrd dtlas for the use of
howas v" that? botgldedga Far WcW 9y W apo W= wd ==am laWV m ft safe and
adstly mammant of &aft MW tln depalmW (Inds Roomy,
.l•1 Ifi! a� '1:'.J 1•. 1 ' • LLL!• li J : .,: IL � !� /!4 �l •.x.11 � 'L.� ". �. t:_. �' 4' � 11 '1! • Llll
Tha depatm at hl lsmdnp pemdta for the use of highways, ataa not be mgxx &* for Me emrd= or
opwaEbn or the pen WMW evWW mid *tree revuhe ate pwmft epp+l6mtt to agree to Indemndjf and hold �.
hamdesa rtes ae►m'aphW any and as &arms aWag we at any asadty for rddd, Ira panne fa Inuad.
venrBny Wman m0way Piod -cbwar
MT. My v&Vda ar et m ma parked or pAumd wholly or partly wNgn any tares dghw% A2r' mW pupate d
soling the same or of selang thereftm or thereU any aalds, senfts or thhtg, /a a publk nuisance and the
deparhtmit nay hhmedW* remove such veldde or &uchso hmn witldn very arch hbft .
My pmaon pwift any such vehkM or p1whV any such sasomro WMW or partly wAW any audr hW wrgr
tar Ors parpoea of sawn such vaftwe or aouaeae, or of anew aawaaom a tiraai% any awWs or ftm
and any person ee ft, dbpfayfng for a" of oftfng for sib any erode or Oft d&W hi or hart ay
NWh r or dmd m so porw or Placed and any pmsan "MIM aen*JIg mpaldng or esteradae
wor/mtg upon try such Md de, other Or uptm a vehicle wfdcb is tompmarfly dhabkd, la 9d►9' d a
admdae�sonar
The CaNkur® tflghMay Pabst end all peace aftsm may wdatce do pmvhkw of M chapter and shad
eo opwate wAh the deparbnw# b *tat end Whenow airy member of are Cafflams Mghm Pad or any
paw oh&av temov s a v&Vda ham a highway m er the proWatsrm of rhrs sestlbn, than ae of eta
p vvishm of erode 3 &w mmrdng "far Sedba MW), chapter 10. DMskn fT date vaMde Coda wldt
mferw to &M M"m•af d a oehide hoar a highway shall be gV&zbk
- 1 -
1
The pros' ans of iMe odba dWi not pruftW a seller ham Wow orders or ddfvaring any conunaft
ham a rwhlcla an that part of any stern highway lmmedlafty adjacent to the pm rAw d the pardmer, nor
MW dm prarlskm of ffila sectlon p *Wt an owrrer or OpWWW of a Vahk , or a medw*, ham
aeevfdng, rspwmg or ofhaft4" mdft apan &V vehicle aftch is mmpararlly d &Wed. h aaah a mara,er
and to aamh an went that it is Imposwe to &W0 =Apbg aueh veMds W'Mh1 much 40hmW.
The transfer is a compromise between the City of San Luis Obispo
and Caltrans to avoid the need to enforce the above noted
Statutes on a nationally known activity, which has been given
recognition by the 'United States Department of Agriculture.
3. STATE PROCESS
Upon receipt of the City's request for highway transfer a joint
field review with the appropriate headquarters and district
personnel, was conducted (attendance listed is Attachment C).
The procedures described .in.the Project Development Procedures
Manual Section 2 -22 and in Policy and Procedure P78 -4 Revised
have been followed. in addition a Cooperative.Agreement between
the City of San Luis Obispo and Caltrans will be written and
executed upon approval of this.transfer by the office of Project
Planning and Design and the Division of Highways.
As noted, the City has requested a transfer of Highway location
(attachment D). As both locations (existing and proposed) are a
part of the local street system and that the impacts were not
significant, the City prepared Sotiae of he which was
filed June 12, 1992 (attachment E).
The proposed route runs westerly along South Street from the
intersection of Broad and South Streets (existing PM R12.72) to
Higuera Street, a distance of 0.78 miles; then southerly along
Higuara Street to Madonna Road, a distance of 0.08 miles; then
southerly crossing VS 101 to the southbound off and on ramps at
the madonna Road /101 Interchange, a distance of 0.39 miles. The
total length of the proposed route transfer is 1.25 miles.
The existing gsometrics through out the proposed route provide
for 4 through lane, left turn channelize at all intersection,
signalizations at major intersection, bike lanes plus curb,
gutter and sidewalks. The route was rehabilitated within the
last three years. There are no existing vertical or horizontl
alignment problems. Average 1990 ADT on South Street was 17,000
on Higuera street it was 27,500 and on Madonna Road it was
25,000.
Right of way is a mixed bag of fee and /or easement as is that of
the existing route. The District Maintenance Department
estimates that the proposed route will be comparable with or less
than Misting expenditure of maintenance person years or dollars
and have no misgiving in the assumption of maintenance.
- 2
PIUU -VU JG II IV 11'1. •✓ rr• r�✓���. ✓• � �� ..�
Concerns expressed at the field review are as follows.
A. Existing restriction (narrowing of South Street) at old
village Mobile Rome Park. The City has informed
Caltrans staff that the owner of this parcel has
redevelopment plans in the review phase with the City
Planning Department. The parcel has been conditioned
to provide widening, curbs, gutters and sidewalk to
match adjacent developments and will be constructed in
the summer of 93.
B. Traffic Department has reviewed the new route and has
identified some very minor signing and striping
irregularities. However, this is also true on the
existing Route 227.
C. The intersections of South Street and Madonna Road with
Higuera Street will require an additional Type 170
controller. we plan on operating these two
intersections as one, however, there are more than 8
phases, hence the additional controller.
D. Lane width on the Madonna O.C., are only Ill. However,
when the City widened the O.C. under permit a Design
Exception was obtained and is in the Permit File.
7. COMPARISON OF SBISTM AND PROPOSED
The existing is all conventional highway, but a mixed bag of 4
lane, two lane, two and three lane one way couplet with no left -
turn ahanneliaation for a total of 4.47 lane miles. There are
also seven. signal systems along the existing. Parking exists on
both sides of 227 for over 90% of the transfer length.
The proposed new route is all conventional Pour lanes with left -
turn channelization. The portion between the Northbound and
Southbound Highway 101 ramps has a maximum of five lanes with
dual northbound left turn lane. A total, of 5.05 lane mile and
four signal systems comprise the proposed route. Pavement
conditions of the proposed route are generally far butter than on
the existing route. Parking exists only an a portion of the
northerly side of South Street, 12$ of transfer length.
Existing Route 227 has an actual accident rate of 2.60 compared
to the expected rate of 2.83 for the three year period of March
11 1989 to March 1, 1992. The proposed transfer route has an
actual accident rate of rate of 3.30 compared to the expected
rate 6.20 for the three year period ending March 1, 1991.
The proposed transfer route is currently signed as the City and
State truck route.
- 3 -
I
i
SUMMARY
* 33 of the accidents were in State R/W at terminus of Highway
101 ramps with Madonna Road. If these accidents were deleted
from the analysis the Actual Accident Rate would be 2.05 MVM.
Getter paving, fewer signal systems, reduction in accident
inducing parking, left -turn channelization and deletion of the
one -way couplet are but a few of the factors that will result in
a reduction of maintenance efforts for the State.
The involved Right of Way has been reviewed and both agencies
agree to accept the associated Right of way concurrently with the
transfer.
The state will benefit in a reduction of maintenance costs, both
roadway and signals, and in vacating a section that is difficult
to maintain because of variable roadway width, parking and heavy
commercial and tourist traffic. Permit applications Will also
reduce in number and complexity. The proposed route will provide
better service for state highway purposes.
The City will be better served by being able to convert the
existing route to better accommodate tourists, shoppers and the
Farmer's Market. The City's desire for control of the existing
route is to reflect the needs of the community of San Luis
Obispo.
The District recommends that we accept the city's request to
transfer Highway 227 over to the proposed route. Both agencies
stand to benefit substantially from the transfer.
The City of San Luis Obispo has placed an urgency on the route
adoption and transfer to best serve the interests of both
agencies involved. The City desires to take over the existing
route to best serve the community interests. Caltrans, District
51 would like to accept jurisdiction over the new alignments as
soon as possible to reduce maintenance costs.
4 -
8sistina
Pronased
Length
1.65
1.25 miles
Lane Miles
4.47
SAS
Signals System
7
4
No. of Accidents
67
87 *(54)
Million vehicles
25.75
39
Actual Accident Rate
2.60
3.30 *(2.05)
Expect Accident Rate
2.83
6.20
Parking on Route
903
123
Pavement Condition
Poor /Fair
Good
One Way Couplets
1
0
* 33 of the accidents were in State R/W at terminus of Highway
101 ramps with Madonna Road. If these accidents were deleted
from the analysis the Actual Accident Rate would be 2.05 MVM.
Getter paving, fewer signal systems, reduction in accident
inducing parking, left -turn channelization and deletion of the
one -way couplet are but a few of the factors that will result in
a reduction of maintenance efforts for the State.
The involved Right of Way has been reviewed and both agencies
agree to accept the associated Right of way concurrently with the
transfer.
The state will benefit in a reduction of maintenance costs, both
roadway and signals, and in vacating a section that is difficult
to maintain because of variable roadway width, parking and heavy
commercial and tourist traffic. Permit applications Will also
reduce in number and complexity. The proposed route will provide
better service for state highway purposes.
The City will be better served by being able to convert the
existing route to better accommodate tourists, shoppers and the
Farmer's Market. The City's desire for control of the existing
route is to reflect the needs of the community of San Luis
Obispo.
The District recommends that we accept the city's request to
transfer Highway 227 over to the proposed route. Both agencies
stand to benefit substantially from the transfer.
The City of San Luis Obispo has placed an urgency on the route
adoption and transfer to best serve the interests of both
agencies involved. The City desires to take over the existing
route to best serve the community interests. Caltrans, District
51 would like to accept jurisdiction over the new alignments as
soon as possible to reduce maintenance costs.
4 -
i�
RESOLUTION NO. 8064 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) REGARDING THE
RESURFACING AND STRIPING OF SANTA ROSA STREET
BETWEEN MURRAY AND WALNUT STREETS FOR THE
PURPOSES OF INSTALLING BICYCLE LANES
SECTION 1. That certain agreement attached hereto marked
"Exhibit All and incorporated herein by reference between the City
of San Luis Obispo and the State of California (Department of
Transportation), wherein the City and the State agree as to the
terms and conditions that will permit the City to resurface and .
stripe Santa Rosa Street between Murray and Walnut Streets (a
State highway), to provide for the installation of bicycle lanes,
is hereby approved.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this
resolution and a copy of the executed agreement approved by it
to: State of California (Department of Transportation) and the
City Engineer.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman , seconded by Councilmember
Rappa and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day
of September
1992.
MAYOR RON DUNIN
CITY LERK PAM GES
R -8064
Resolution No. 8064 (1992 series)
Page Two.
APPROVED:
City A inistrative Officer
City F� ineer
wap3 /state -agr
by
E
M.
01. J\i
05 -SLO- 00.1 - 16.77/17.11
05 -254- 397801
RESURFACE /DELINEATE BIKE IN.
-20? District Agreement #5CA9207
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON / , If92 is
between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and high its
Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE,"
and
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
a body politic and a municipal
corporation of the State of
California, referred to herein
as "CITY"
RECITALS
(1.) STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and
Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a
Cooperative Agreement for improvements to STATE highways
within CITY.
(4) STATE and CITY desire to specify herein the
terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be
engineered, constructed, financed and maintained.
SECTION I
CITY AGREES:
(1) To provide, at no cost to STATE, all necessary
preliminary engineering, including plans and specifications,
Page 1 of 8
A- 94 -92 -CC
(2) CITY desires State
highway improvements
consisting of resurfacing and restriping traffic lanes to
include bicycle lanes on Route
1, Santa Rosa Street, from
Walnut Street to Murray Street
in the City of San Luis
Obispo, referred to herein as "PROJECT
". CITY is willing to
fund one hundred percent (100 %)
of CITY staffing costs,
except that STATE's oversight of environmental, design and
right -of -way activities may be
borne by STATE.
C1
(3) STATE is agreeable
to CITY's proposed PROJECT,
M
and will reimburse CITY up to 50% for construction costs,
Co�J
not to exceed $48,400.
(4) STATE and CITY desire to specify herein the
terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be
engineered, constructed, financed and maintained.
SECTION I
CITY AGREES:
(1) To provide, at no cost to STATE, all necessary
preliminary engineering, including plans and specifications,
Page 1 of 8
A- 94 -92 -CC
9
and all necessary construction engineering services for
PROJECT.
(2) To construct PROJECT by contract in accordance
with plans and specifications prepared by CITY and approved
by STATE.
(3) To bear all actual PROJECT costs in excess of
$96,800.
(4) CITY, at no cost to STATE, as part of its
PROJECT design responsibility, shall identify and locate all
utility facilities within the PROJECT area. All utility
facilities not relocated or removed in advance of
construction shall be identified on the PROJECT plans and
specifications.
(5) To relocate utility facilities within STATE's
right of way to STATE specifications per STATE's
Encroachment Manual and the Manual on High and.Low Risk
Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way.
(6) To apply for necessary encroachment permits for
required work within State highway rights of way, in
accordance with STATE's standard permit procedures, as more
specifically defined in Articles (8), (9) and (10) of
Section III of this Agreement.
(7) Construction within the existing or ultimate
STATE right of way shall comply with the requirements in
STATE's Standard Specifications and PROJECT Special
provisions and in conformance with methods and practices
specified in STATE's Construction Manual.
(8) If, during the course of construction, errors
or omissions are discovered in any of the plans and
specifications which CITY and /or personnel have provided
pursuant to this Agreement, CITY and /or personnel shall make
all necessary corrections and furnish the corrected product
to STATE within a reasonable time to be specified by STATE.
(9) CITY's construction contractor shall maintain
in force, until completion and acceptance of the PROJECT
construction contract, a policy of Contractual Liability
Insurance, including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability and
Property Damage Liability in accordance with Section 7 -1.12
of State Standard Specifications. Such policy shall contain
an additional insured endorsement naming STATE, its
officers, agents and employees as additional insureds.
Coverage shall be evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance in
a form satisfactory to STATE which shall be delivered to
a. ®® Page 2 of 8
Pea
STATE before the issuance of an Encroachment Permit to
CITY's contractor.
(10) At CITY expense, to furnish a field site
representative, subject to approval of STATE, who is a
licensed Civil Engineer in the State of California, to
perform the functions of a. Resident Engineer. The Resident
Engineer shall be a public employee in accordance with
Section 2 -07 of the Local Programs Manual..
(11) Within sixty (60) days following the
completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction
contract, to furnish STATE a complete set of acceptable
full -sized film positive reproducible As -Built plans.
(12) To retain or cause to be retained for audit
for STATE or other government auditors for a period of three
(3) years from date of FHWA payment of final voucher, or
four (4) years from date of final payment under the
contract, whichever is longer, all records and accounts
relating to construction.
(13) If CITY terminates PROJECT prior to completion
of the construction contract for PROJECT, STATE may require
CITY, at CITY expense, to return right of way to its
original condition or to a condition of acceptable permanent
operation. If CITY fails to do so,-STATE reserves the right
to finish PROJECT or place PROJECT in satisfactory permanent
operating condition. STATE will bill CITY for all actual
expenses incurred and CITY agrees to pay said expenses
within thirty (30) days or STATE, acting through the State
Controller, may withhold an equal amount from future
apportionments due CITY from the Highway User Tax Fund.
co
(14) To comply with the terms and conditions of the
CC
Highway encroachment permits, existing California law,
including Statutory and Case law, and all existing property
rights when determining liability for utility relocation
costs within the existing or proposed State highway right of
way.
SECTION II
STATE AGREES:
(1) To pay an amount equal to 50% of the actual
PROJECT construction cost estimated to be,$44,000, but in no
event shall STATE's total obligation for PROJECT
construction costs under this Agreement exceed the amount of
$48,400.
Page 3 of 8
N'
(2) To deposit with CITY within 30 days of receipt
of billing therefor (which billing will be forwarded
immediately following CITY's bid advertising date of a
construction contract for PROJECT), the amount of $44,000,
which figure represents 50% of the total estimated PROJECT
construction costs of $88,000.
(3) To provide CITY with necessary regulations,
policies, procedures, manuals, standard plans and
specifications and other documents required for the
preparation of the plans and specifications.
(4) To issue, at no cost to CITY and CITY's
contractor, upon proper application by CITY and by CITY's
contractor, the necessary encroachment permits for required
work within the State Highway right of way.
(5) To provide, at CITY expense, any "State
furnished material" as shown on the plans for PROJECT and as
provided in the Special Provisions for PROJECT.
(6) To provide, at no cost to CITY, a qualified.
STATE representative who shall have authority to accept or
reject work and materials or to order any actions needed for
public safety or the preservation of property and to assure
compliance with all provisions of the Encroachment Permit(s)
issued to CITY and to CITY's contractor.
SECTION III M
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: COID
00
(1) All obligations of STATE under the terms of
this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources
by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the
California Transportation Commission.
(2) Should CITY award a construction contract for
PROJECT prior to the allocation of resources by the
California Transportation Commission, there is no guarantee
of STATE's participation and CITY shall assume all risks
thereof.
(3) Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with
Federal funds or State gas tax funds all applicable
procedures and policies relating to the use of such funds
shall apply notwithstanding other provisions of this
Agreement.
Page 4 of I
c M
o P Ya
(4) STATE shall designate a STATE Project
Coordinator and CITY shall designate a representative
through whom all communications between the two agencies
shall be channeled. All phases of PROJECT from inception to
and including maintenance will be developed in accordance
with all policies, procedures, practices, standards,
regulations and laws that apply to STATE.
(5) CITY shall not advertise for bids to construct
PROJECT until after an encroachment permit has been issued
to CITY by STATE, nor shall CITY award a contract to
construct PROJECT until after receipt of STATE's deposit .
required in Section II, Article (2) of this Agreement.
(6) Prior to award of the construction contract for
PROJECT, CITY may terminate this Agreement by written
notice.
(7) After opening of bids for construction of
PROJECT and if bids indicate a cost overrun of no more than
10% of the estimate will occur, CITY may award the contract.
(8) Construction by CITY of improvements referred
to herein which lie within STATE highway rights of way or
affect STATE facilities, shall not be commenced until CITY
original contract plans involving such work and plan for
utility relocations have been reviewed and accepted by
signature of STATE's District Director of Transportation, or
the District Director's delegated agent, and until an
Encroachment Permit to CITY authorizing such work has been
4:7)
issued by STATE.
C`D
(9) CITY shall obtain aforesaid Encroachment Permit
d0
through the office of State District Permit engineer and
CITY's application shall be accompanied_ five (.5).sets of
reduced construction plans of aforesaid STATE approved
contract plans. Receipt by CITY of.the approved
Encroachment Permit shall constitute CITY authorization from
STATE to proceed with work to be performed by CITY or CITY
representatives within proposed STATE rights of way or which
affects STATE facilities, pursuant to work covered by this
Agreement. CITY's authorization to proceed with said work
shall be contingent upon CITY's compliance with all
provisions set forth in this Agreement and said Encroachment
Permit.
(10) CITY's construction contractor shall also be
required to obtain an Encroachment Permit from STATE prior
to commencing any work within STATE rights of way or which
affects STATE facilities. The application by CITY's
contractor for said Encroachment Permit shall be made
through the office of State District Permit Engineer and
Page 5 of 8
shall include proof said contractor has payment and
performance surety bonds covering construction of PROJECT.
(11) Prior to award of the construction contract
for PROJECT, STATE may terminate this Agreement by written
notice, provided that STATE pays CITY for all PROJECT
related costs incurred by CITY prior to termination.
(12) Pursuant to the authority contained in Section
591 of the Vehicle Code, STATE has determined that within
such areas as are within the limits of PROJECT and are open
to public traffic, CITY shall comply with all the
requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15
of the Vehicle Code. CITY shall take all necessary
precautions for safe operation of CITY's vehicles, the
construction contractor's equipment and vehicles and /or
vehicles of personnel retained by CITY and for the
protection of the traveling public from injury and damage
from such vehicles or equipment.
(13) If any existing public and /or private utility
facilities conflict with the construction of PROJECT, CITY
shall make all.necessary arrangements with the owners of
such facilities for their protection, relocation or removal.
CITY shall inspect the protection, relocation or removal of
such facilities. If any protection, relocation or removal
of facilities is required, such work shall be performed in
accordance with STATE policy and procedure for those
facilities located within the limits of work providing for
the improvement to the State Highway and in accordance with
CITY policy for those facilities located outside of the
limits of work providing for the improvement to the State
Highway. Total costs of such protection, relocation or
removal shall be borne by CITY and /or other non -State
entities in accordance with the terms of the Highway
Encroachment Permits, Case Law, Public. Utility Regulations
and Property Rights. CITY shall require any utility company
performing relocation work in STATE's right of way to obtain
a STATE encroachment Permit prior to the performance of said
relocation work. Any relocated or new facilities shall be
correctly shown and identified on the As- Built plans
referred to in Section I. Article (4), of this Agreement.
(14) Upon completion and acceptance of the PROJECT
construction contract by CITY to the satisfaction of the
STATE representative and subsequent to the execution of a
maintenance agreement, STATE will accept control of and
maintain, at its own cost and expense, those portions of
PROJECT lying within STATE's right of way, except local
roads delegated to CITY for maintenance. STATE will
maintain, at STATE expense, the entire structure below the
deck surface of any CITY local road overcrossing.
Page 6 of 8
(15) In the construction of said PROJECT,
representatives of CITY and STATE will cooperate and
consult, and all work pursuant to PROJECT, within STATE's
right of way, may, at no cost to CITY furnish a
representative, if it so desires to ensure conformance of
work to STATE's standards. Said representatives of CITY and
STATE will cooperate and consult with each other, but all
work within STATE's right of way shall be accomplished to
the satisfaction of STATE's representative.
(16) Upon completion of all work under this
Agreement, ownership and title to materials, equipment and
appurtenances installed within STATE's right of way will
automatically.be vested in STATE, and materials, equipment
and appurtenances installed outside of STATE's right of way
will automatically be vested in CITY. No further agreement
will be necessary to transfer ownership as hereinabove
stated.
(17) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee
thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability
occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done
by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is
also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4,
CITY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any
liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code
Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this
Agreement.
(18) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee
thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability
occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done
by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is
also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4,
STATE shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any
liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code
Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under
this Agreement.
(19) All phases of PROJECT involving State highway
facilities, whether handled by CITY or STATE, shall be
developed in accordance with all policies, procedures,
practices, standards, specifications and regulations that
apply to STATE.
Page 7 of 8
M
M
(�O
(20) Those portions of this Agreement pertaining to
the construction of PROJECT shall terminate upon completion
and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT by
CITY with concurrence of STATE, or on June 30, 1994,
whichever is earlier in time; however, the ownership,
operation, maintenance, liability and claims clauses shall
remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by
mutual agreement.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation
BYJC/
District Di rctor
Date: AD-S -SZ
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
B
Mayor Ron Dunin
Date:
Attest:
By
Approved as to Form and Procedure
Date:
v.
Clerk ka}n Voges
DwO 77--
Atto y, Departure of
Trans rtation
Date: ZZ �
Certified as to Funds and Procedure 8(191C) Z
Date:
Approved as to Content
Public)Works Director
�r Approved as to Form
Di trict c ing Administrator
Date: c1 1 c12'
Page 8 of 8
#%OPV
co
co
,;c
(A'Y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATkM AND HOUSING AGENCY PETE WILSON, Govemor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 8114
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 -811A _
Vii..
TDD (805) 549.3259 \ --,.
i, h I� _i_i. _ �•_.
August 18,1992
AUG
I "' � � •'.05 -SL0- 001- 16.77/17.11
or . I`; ; cls: "RESURFACE? /DELINEATE BIKE LANE
District Agreement #5CA9207
Mr. Wayne Peterson
City Engineer
City of San Luis Obispo
P O Box 8100
San Luis Obispo CA 93403
Dear Mr. Peterson,
Attached for execution are the original and four (4) copies of .
the Cooperative Agreement between the State and the City of San
Luis Obispo for resurfacing and restriping traffic lanes to
include bicycle lanes on Route 1, Santa Rosa Street, from Walnut
Street to Murray Street.
After execution by authorized City officials, please"return the
original and three (3) copies with a copy of the authorizing
resolution attached to each copy for execution by the State. A
fully executed copy will be returned for your files.
Sincerely,
Carolyn `Wheeler
Associate Caltrans Administrator
Cooperative Agreement Coordinator
Attachment
�� illlllilllllllllllll����������� II�IIIIIIIII of Cl sAn tuis oBispo
990 Palm Street /Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
September 8, 1992
Ms. Carolyn Wheeler
Cooperative Agreement Coordinator
Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 8114
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8114
Dear Ms. Wheeler:
At its. meeting of September 1, 1992, the San Luis Obispo City Council approved the
Cooperative Agreement between the State and the City of San Luis Obispo for resurfacing
and restriping traffic lanes to include bicycle lanes on Route 1, Santa Rosa Street, from
Walnut Street to Murray Street.
Enclosed are the original and three (3) copies with a copy of the authorizing resolution
attached to each of the above - referenced agreements for execution by the State. Please
return a copy to my attention once it has been fully executed. Thank you.
erely,f
V
am Voges, C
City Clerk
PV.jsb
Enclosures
c: Wayne Peterson, Engineering
STATE-OF CALIFORNIA— BUSINESS, TRANSPORT41(m,M AND HOUSING AGENCY I PETE WILSON, Govemor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -
P.O. BOX 8114
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 -8114
TDD (805) 549.3259
OCT - 7 1992
ENGINEERING DIVISION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
October 5, 1992
05 -SLO- 001 - 16.77/17.11
05- 254 - 397801
RESURFACE /DELINEATE BIKE LANE
District Agreement #5CA9207
Mr. Wayne Peterson
City Engineer
City of San Luis Obispo
P 0 Box 8100
San Luis Obispo Ca 93403
Dear Sir:
Enclosed for your files is the fully executed Cooperative
Agreement 5CA9207 (Document #8339) between the State and City of
San Luis Obispo. This Agreement is for highway improvements
consisting of resurfacing and restriping traffic lanes to include
bicyicle lanes on Route 1, Santa Rosa Street, from Walnut Street
to Murray Street in the City of San Luis Obispo. The City is
funding 100% of City staffing costs, except that the State's
oversight of environmental, design and right of way activities
may be borne by State.
Please feel free to call me at 549 -3072 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Carolyn heeler
Cooperative Agreement Coordinator
Attachment
6
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8063 (1992 Series.)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT MAP FROM
INTERIM CONSERVATION OPEN SPACE TO OFFICE
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 40 PRADO ROAD
AND AMENDING SECTION C.5.b. OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TEXT (GP /R 1516)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and, the City Council have
held public hearings on this amendment in accordance with the
California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the amendment comes to the council upon the favorable
recommendation of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the potential environmental impacts of the change
have been evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council has
determined that the project's Negative Declaration adequately
addresses the potential significant environmental impacts of the
proposed general plan amendments, incorporating the mitigation
measures shown on the attached Exhibit "A" into the project.
SECTION 2. Findincrs.
1. The proposed general plan amendment will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity.
2. The proposed general plan amendment is consistent with
the goals and policies of the General Plan.
3. The proposed amendment will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment, subject to the
mitigation measures referenced in Section 1, and listed'
in Exhibit "A ", being included in the .project, and the
City Council hereby approves the Negative Decalaration.
R -8063
Resolution No. 8063 (1992 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 3. Adoption.
1. The Land Use Element is hereby amended as shown in
Exhibit "B ".
2. The Community Development Director shall cause the change
to be reflected in documents which are on display in City
Hall and which are available for public use.
SECTION 4. Related Action. That the request for the general
plan amendment text change to add text to Section C.S.b. of the
Land Use Element regarding the appropriateness of office
development at the site be approved as follows, based on the
following finding:
An area north of Prado Road and east of Elks Lane, which may
be changed to an urban land -use designation when the flood
hazard is mitigated. The portion of this area abutting Prado
which is generally focused on the intersection of Prado Road
and South Higuera Street.
Finding
1. The proposed general plan text amendment is consistent
with the goals and policies of the General Plan, subject
to the area limitations of the planned development.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman , seconded
by. Councilmember Pinard and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Pinard, and Reiss
NOES: Councilmember Rappa and Mayor Dunin
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
September, 1992.
Resolution No. 8063 (19.92 Series)
Page 3
unin
ATTEST:
V
City Cle Pam Vog s
APPROVED:
ity A inistrative Officer
ff r
MAINE, Mir"m Mp,�,
�I
EXHIBIT A
Prado Center Environmental Review
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ER 14 -91
SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES
& MONITORING PROGRAM
In conformance with AB 3180, the following mitigation measures will be monitored as
indicated below:
22
1. Banks, real estate offices, financial institutions, medical clinics and doctor offices,
and lawyers offices will not be allowed to be established at this site.
Monitoring=
This restriction on allowed offices at the site shall become a condition of
Preliminary Development Plan approval, and entered in the City's Land Use
Inventory to alert staff of the restriction in its review of business licenses for new
uses established at the site.
2. A text amendment to Section C.S.b. of the adopted LUE, which specifically
identifies the site as a part of the Social Services government pole, shall be
approved. Precise language of the text amendment shall be as approved by the
Planning Commission and City Council.
Monitoring:
The Planning Commission and City Council will need to review and consider the
proposed modification to the LUE text for appropriateness and consistency with
general plan goals.
3. The applicant shall either install a traffic signal, or alternative traffic control
measures acceptable to the City Engineer, at the Elks Lane and South Higuera
Street intersection with the development of project Phase 3. Prior to approval of
the precise plan for Phase 3, the applicant shall submit a report which studies
the feasibility of signal installation and evaluates alternative traffic control
measures available.
Monitori=
The requirement would be incorporated into planned development approval. The
required report would need to be submitted with the application for architectural
review of Phase 3.
Prado Center Environmental Review 23
4. The plan shall be revised to show a realignment of Elks Lane that is designed for
a 25 MPH design speed, including its connection and transition with the existing
street, and include a separated and defined pedestrian drop -off point, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Monitoring,
The City Engineer, by reviewing project plans during precise plan review,
architectural review and building permit plan check, would confirm whether the
street alignment was consistent with City design standards.
S. The southernmost driveway entrance to parking facilities closest to the Elks Lane
and Prado Road intersection shall be designed to allow for adequate sight
distances and minimize conflicts in turning movements. Possible alternatives
include: moving the entrance further to the north; or adding a median in Elks
Lane near the intersection to prevent left turns out of the parking lot.
Monitoring:
The precise plan for the project and architectural plans for Phase 1 shall reflect a
driveway solution acceptable to the Community Development Department and
Public Works Department staffs. .
6. The applicant will be required to pay a pro -rata share to the City of the cost of
proposed area -wide traffic improvements as detailed in the traffic study prepared
for the project and dated May 1, 1992.
Monitoring:
Fees would be collected at the time of building permit issuance. A payment
schedule to coordinate with project phasing would be developed.
7. The applicant shall submit a trip reduction program containing a list of actions
to reduce auto use to the Community Development Director for review and
approval. The plan shall include the following components:
a. Designate a Transportation Coordinator to organize ride- sharing and
other trip reduction programs, post and disseminate information to
employees about transportation alternatives, survey employees regarding
preferences, and provide on -going monitoring regarding program success;
b. Provide bicycle parking and lockers and showers in the project to
encourage employees to ride bicycles to work;
C
,C
Prado Center Environmental Review 24
c. Coordinate with the City regarding development of a bus turnout,
passenger shelter and transit sign to serve the project; .
d. Adopt a goal to increase Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) to 1.5 within 3
years of first building occupancy;
e. With combined employees of 100 or more, sponsor a van pool service.
Monitoring:
City Community Development Department, or Public Works Traffic Division, staff
would monitor the trip reduction program annually until the County APCD sets
up an independent monitoring program.
8. Consistent with the recommendations included in the Seismic Safety Element, a
detailed soils and geology report needs to be submitted at the time of building
permit which considers special. grading and construction techniques necessary to
address the potential for liquefaction.
Monitoring_
Community Development Department staff would review the report and its
recommendations in evaluating the project plans as part of building permit plan
check.
9. Consistent with Municipal Code Section 15.44.270, all graded surfaces shall be
wetted, protected or contained in such a manner as to prevent dust or spill upon
any adjoining property or street. The following measures shall constitute the
project's dust management plan and shall remain in effect during all phases of
that project's construction:
a. Regular wetting of roads and graded areas (at least twice daily with
complete coverage of all active areas);
b. Increasing frequency of watering whenever winds exceed 15 mph;
C. Cessation of grading activities during periods of winds over 25 mph;
d. Direct application of water on material being excavated and /or
transported onsite or offsite;
e. Watering material stockpiles; and
Prado Center Environmental Review
f. Periodic washdowns, or mechanical streetsweeping, of Broad Street and
Rockview Place in the vicinity of the construction site.
25
g. Non - potable water is to be used in all construction and dust control work.
Monitoring
Grading practices shall be monitored by Community Development Department
staff through field inspections during project construction.
10. The finish floor of project buildings shall be raised to a minimum of 136.5'
elevation to be consistent with the City's Flood Damage Prevention Regulations:
Monitoring
This shall be reviewed by Community Development Department and Public
Works staffs by reviewing project plans during precise plan review, architectural
review and building permit plan check.
11. A qualified archaeologist will be retained to monitor project grading and
trenching activities. If excavations encounter significant cultural materials,
construction activities which may affect them shall cease until the extent of the .
resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the
Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall
be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be
recorded by a qualified archaeologist..
12. If pre - historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American
monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and
remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal
laws. A note concerning this requirement shall be included on the grading and
construction plans for the project.
Monitoring (Mitigation Measures 11 & 12):
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Community
Development Department review and approval an archaeological work program
detailing the plan for monitoring and the archaeologist retained to monitor
construction.
13. The existing structures on the site shall be reviewed by the Cultural Heritage
Committee and the Architectural Review Commission. The farm house and water
tower buildings shall be photo- documented prior to their demolition.
1 1 /
Prado Center Environmental Review 1 26
Monitorine•
Community Development Department staff shall monitor by sending demolition .
plans to the CHC and ARC. Standards for photo - documentation shall be set by
the CHC.
14. All office buildings and other project facilities shall be located at locations on the
site with magnetic field readings (resultant values) of 1.0 mG or less. A report
needs to be prepared and additional measurements taken to conf rm where on the
site that those readings occur. Building footprints may need to be adjusted to
accommodate this standard.
Monitoring:
This shall be reviewed by Community Development Department and Public
Works staffs by reviewing project plans during precise plan review, architectural
review and building permit plan check.
15. If the Community Development Director determines that the above mitigation
measures are ineffective or physically infeasible, he may add, delete or modify the
mitigation to meet the intent of the original measures.
GENERA,. PLAN MAP AMLNDMENT
EXHIBIT B GP/Rl 516
r r ltc�
I
j
Change from Interim Open
Space
7-�: to Office
I
a
1" = 1,000'
a � � �
�," �
��
RESOLUTION NO. 8062 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO UPHOLDING THE TREE COMMITTEE'S
DECISION TO DENY TREE REMOVAL REQUEST
AT 288.HERMOSA WAY
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Tree Committee feels that the
large Italian Stone Pine located at 288 Hermosa Way is an
exceptional specimen tree and should be preserved; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the plans, the members requested that
the plans be revised to allow for the preservation of the tree;
and
WHEREAS, they felt it was possible to design the addition in
such away so as to allow for its retention.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of San Luis Obispo upholds the Tree Committee's decision to_deny
the tree removal request at 288 Hermosa Way.
Upon motion of Councilmember Rappa , seconded by
Councilmember Pinard , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, Roalman and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1st day of September
1992.
,L Uot,46 'M-ayor on unin
ATTEST
PameA Voges, Cio Clerk
288hermosa/wp#1
R -8062
ASO,
Ja
RESOLUTION N0.8061(1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING BIA FEE SCHEDULE
FOR THURSDAY NIGHT ACTIVITIES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Resolution 6942 (1991 Series) is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. That the Fee Schedule for Thursday Night
Activities, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" has been reviewed
and incorporated herein by reference, is accepted. Recommended
changes shall be made from time to time by the BIA Board of
Directors for subsequent Council approval.
On motion of Councilmember Reiss , seconded
by Councilmember Rappa , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa, Pinard, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1st day of September
unin
ATTES
Pam Vo es, City rNerk
APPROVED:
R -8061
i 1
THURSDAY NIGHT ACTIVITIES /FARMERS' MARKET
FEE SCHEDULE
ALL FEES ARE BASED ON A PER NIGHT BASIS, AND MUST BE PAID IN ADVANCE.
Ongoing participants will be billed quarterly, 30 days in advance of the
start of the quarter with payment due by the 15th of the month starting the
quarter.
BILLING DATES QUARTER DUE DATE
December 1 (lst)January, February, March January 15
March 1 (2nd)April, May, June April 15
June 1 (3rd)July, August, September July 15
September 1 (4th)October, November, December October 15
Permits will be revoked for non - payment of fees within 30 days of the due
date. An interest rate of 18% will be charged for all late payments (paid
after the due date).
FEE SCHEDULE:
PER
WEEK
Barbecue ..... • •
....... •
............. ..................$
.16
(total square footage x$.16 per square foot)
BIA Member Food Vendors... ............... ...................$
10 -$30
($10 per 10 feet of space, 30feet maximum)
BIAMember Direct Sales...... ..... ........................$
5 -$10
($5 per 10 feet of space, 20 feet maximum)
Direct Sales -Non Profit ... ............. .................$
10
( Four times per year, 8 foot space maximum)
Information -Non Profit .......... ..............................$
10
( 8 foot space maximum)
Media............ ............. ..............................$
25
( 8 foot space maximum)
Entertainment................... ..............................$
5
Non - Competing Business........... ............. ............$ 50 -$100
($50 per 10 feet, 20 feet maximum)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: The Farmers' Market Association is charged 1% of its gross sales and
10% of the event's fixed costs, payable quarterly. Fixed costs include
barricades, garbage collection, janitorial, and administrative costs.
Revised 7/92
EXHIBIT A
� • � ��,
�, � ��
�°
M1
`� �
��
r ;
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
No. N-o11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ss.
County of Son Luis Obispo
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not
interested in the above - entitled _( _
; I am now, and at all times embraced
in the publication herein mention was, the principal clerk
of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO
COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published daily, Sundays ex-
"�a.�' '
cepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above
atiY oC
�_._ l� San lues oatspo,
^
named county and state; that Yllf? 1 �.�/
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
THURSDAY NIGHT FEES
The Sari Luis Obispo City
Council will hold a public
I hearing an Tuesday, Septem-
ber 1, 1992, to discuss .
changes to the Thursday
Night/Farmers' Market Rules
and Regulations and fee
at which the annexed clipping is a true printed copy, was
structure. The fee changes
recommended by the Busi-
published in the above -named newspaper and not in any
ness Improvement Associa-
tion include: 1) Information
supplement thereof — on the following dates, to -wit:
and Non Profit groups
charged $10 per night up
from the current $5; 2) Media
charges raised from $10 to
$25 per night; 3) Barbecuers
per foot charge raised 5% to
$.16; and, 4) Increase in fees
paid by the Farmers' Associa-
tion to cover 10% of the fixed
costs including garbage, bar-
ricades and janitorial.
j The meeting will be held in
that said news dui and regularly ascertained
newspaper was y re y ce ne
the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 990 Palm Street begin -
and established a newspaper of general circulation by
ning at 7:00 p.m. If you have
any questions concerning this r
Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo
Item, please call the Business
Improvement Association at
County, State of California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139
541.0286.
by /s/Pam Voges; City Clerk
under the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the
Aug•27,1992 av3m11 I
Government Code of the State of California.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
of Principal Clerk)
Date s 7 , 19 q L'
to
K
d
'LS
c:
N
X
`*7
C
CL
to
M
q
IL
a
OC
0
C
f1
a
0
.i
EP
CD
A
O
R
2.
11
R_
O
A
n
0
e
0
on
a
Z
_e
0
W
0
v
RESOLUTION NO.8060 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING BIA RULES AND REGULATIONS
FOR THURSDAY NIGHT ACTIVITIES
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Resolution 6941 (1991 Series) is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. That the BIA Rules and Regulations for Thursday
Night Activities, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by reference, have been reviewed and are
accepted. Recommended changes shall be made from time to time by
the BIA Board of Directors for subsequent Council approval.
by
On motion Of Councilmember Reiss
Councilmember Rappa
call vote:
, seconded
, and on the following roll
AYES: Councilmembers Reiss, Rappa, Pinard, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilmember Roalman
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1st day of September
ATTEST:
Pam VogpS, City C1 Tj
APPROVED:
' :1.1
N
0
0
W
c
oy•oCD
wcDy
my
m
c
Cl)
z
fA
V/
Z
r
m
C
�c'm'a
O -
co
-.
m
y
-� 0
--j
0
0
Fp
c
-
0
�� y y
w
C)
zm
Z�
mu
a
0
o
m
z
O
C
\�
R
"Ci OCQ Q. C
'o
C B �'
cn
I.��• ri
C'1
e
TY
0
r
r
C
y
a
R
•o'
w
y
C
m
m<
z
i I
oy•oCD
wcDy
my
b0�
fA
�c'm'a
`gym
co
oao.
t3
fDOCDy.e''
-. �w
wwE
Fp
CO
.7 w
0
�� y y
..�
O C
CD
fD
rwp
o �a�
I��
.d o o
:03 o °
0 .�
. b•
.n,. R y w y < 4
R
"Ci OCQ Q. C
'o
C B �'
O Z
m
n R O
•00 7
O
A O
0 C .': N rLy QO
O
C
S. to
O
M .+
'T Y rw a
0
R
ran
m
o f° O
m F
r. Srn
crA
C M
d :
T
O
M-6 p 0=0 M.
m
y: ,
n co
0.
0
a'_:_� a
asp :?
,f DA w
v �o
'd?:°
.
cow
-, 3 w
.a'F
o °o m°
w
w
y
�, m'
CD 0 n.
y y n
..,`� Q w O
m
R• o CD
^a w CD
0 `�
�'
G'
y
FL =; �y y'
^o
0 M= w Gy <
G 5' w cD
aro Er w
ao W
cD p R O
R O< C t<
A
C CD M
0 0
y C
<w DGaG
p
y(�° -1gr
w.
R rO y. w
CD N co O Cs'
CD
C
_y
R O
w•
R
co
w
CD CI.
CD
(IQ
M,�
0'�. CO � o
m.
B C
>w
Oa
C
d
w
N
I.��• ri
C'1
e
TY
0
r
r
C
y
a
R
•o'
w
y
C
m
m<
z
i I
-a
cfl
CD
A
W
�
"w0
a
<
CD
ti
y
1�1 fA
Co
r.
o
y
O <
a:
°AYE
yaEl
El y
=w
�.W
3
O
'�
eSD
ee
O
C
A
GO
4
A
ar
A
EA
amD =
^bo n.
.'T O
H
jF
I Co
3
O
o B
O
OQ
y
A
+
..
a
` CO
S3
6=
F
xm
m
8m
m
CL
m s
mm
m
9
0
w o ao
.y =
O o
CD Co
o w
•o o co^D °,
0.A S w Q
w�Oma
o o 0
a y
O A-r
C c m a.
° °—Im•M
.y cob w
R
ay
r> CD
w
CD A
CD cc
fRq � CD y
m ^+ CD w
CD. y
ngg
0
0
ga i
n 30$
04
g3
�S
&$ou Fig r=
ou S
Z Q 3 m
a
a g m
a `m6 m z
5.
m
D+ m
D
sag
m
3
S
m
D
Qo
d
o
and ac �
CD S
p CD A C C
f1. � A N ,�
p ^ a. A p
pJ O
�c�oaaa
SyA�mtDY
i Q
o �
y 0 y y
�e �< o
o CD CL
_ O
Q � O
uo
�$
m
m
8�
D
�• r
O
�-n
OD
03
m
0
z9
n
m
< m
a �
S
c
N
d
m
K
Rw
0
0
F
o'
vo
a
w
00
a�
3
fA
C
w
O.
N
A
H
S
O
S
A
m
A
H
y
1
C
A
R
C
a
c'[i7y
ar
.'T O
H
jF
I Co
3
0
o B
O
OQ
CO CD
c
p A
.,
C
'
` CO
O
m
p
x
p b
C (D
a
w
'O'y
C3
r
rL
CD fp
CD
O
CD
w
Co
.wy
O
^�
A O
'l7
R .Ar
A
0 CD
R
r
so
o
A
<.
CD
3
.,
-wti
m ?.
0
c
QQ
w
0
ID
C3
CD.
CO
c°qD
0. (D
:9•
w
y y
rr
O
w
_
C
C
R CD
O
0.
c A
ow
co
R
y
a
y
R
0
CD
C
CD
r+i O
fD
A
CRD
R w
r
LD
QQ
Cn
CD
0 Co
y
_CD
&$ou Fig r=
ou S
Z Q 3 m
a
a g m
a `m6 m z
5.
m
D+ m
D
sag
m
3
S
m
D
Qo
d
o
and ac �
CD S
p CD A C C
f1. � A N ,�
p ^ a. A p
pJ O
�c�oaaa
SyA�mtDY
i Q
o �
y 0 y y
�e �< o
o CD CL
_ O
Q � O
uo
�$
m
m
8�
D
�• r
O
�-n
OD
03
m
0
z9
n
m
< m
a �
S
c
N
d
m
K
Rw
0
0
F
o'
vo
a
w
00
a�
3
fA
C
w
O.
N
A
H
S
O
S
A
m
A
H
y
1
C
A
R
C
a
CD
.p
70
CD
AL
m
CD
w
B
w
a
to
9
w 's7
° C
O
O
n C
(D y
c�D y
n ¢
sy
w
y n
0
1
O �
O 0'4
� S
o °
3
" 3
b COp
A
y
O
I m
y 3
C
1
=�
CD
y -O
� x
o •-
vo CD
w
CD
O y
A .b
fD O
C1 �
3 °
� w
y �
d
O Z
'+ O
C
CD
0 5-
°__
CD O
FL
,
C
I
b
CACD
3
y
0
O
CT
w
CA
Oq
(D
a
O
y
O
e•
21
I�
D-
^1
y
wCY CD y
� c o G1 W
^' N y. y V
y S y CT
° 0. '�" S O CD
O CD
C40.
�.c
w `°•h y w CD
CD
b
ti
�•0 o ate'' ^•
O CL CD
tz`� O..� N CD =
�.• to w Q. y CL
A
O o CD
CD CD a
H <.
°30,�°- cD
W Sy O
w
W O O
n ..�• Q.,Oy � CAD
O C1 a+ w
0. O p ::
fCi `G ro
CD w ?
m
w
'^G7
r�
w
m L.,o
C a
=27'
'
='o
CD
OQ
M w
y
o
i M.
rA
° n
^. CD 0 ti
=r
CD y
C• 0
G7Sa.
cw -o p w
cr o
CD
°
CD
CD
v
c =
CA
=
O w{
O CD
'.� "i� ^ •• UO
ra
CD
w y w
n.
—0
Boa ;fa
EL O y
n
0 CD
CD
� �
c
w
M
c�
3
�tv
J
FBI
,y
iQ
.2
cfl
(D
x
a7
(Q
(D
0.
a
A
ao
w
a_
a•
0
y
0
ao
0
m•
CD
c
0
a
m
a
G
o'
Oo
Fr
CD
T
eD
c
y
Z < ° '17 A:
r.9 E.> C n y c �.� o O o� o
CD
o m a CD y °o a? o y� 5�
CD
3 r, Oo C» `< ^. �. co o m :D. n " CD Cy o o- CD
O w C7 7 'a O Z p 0 CD
0
Oro , ,. C C< D
S �woawc c►r1 co t
co
CD
w ow.o O w.. co
•
O 3 ^ G. n• �•^a N n 0 y O q�q
OQ
a to
co
y �c
�ocD a° ^c Z"� y� c
..
o � aD � °' " � v� 0� ° °c ° c w a C1 c' coo •°;
• n c�
CD �. O y C17 c "d y a a c "d o
a CD yo <2: 7d mayco cD `��o a °o n
° a0 3 y o°
CO
CD
<•B a•° CD
CD go CD O
Q.
O co ^ ^
CD
o M
,� O N• CD y `t fD
pt co
a, � . a o m co
" Z � � �• �- .* ' o i n � tD ° M. = ° o' er
�o �' 57,.3 a,.. coy o<< o O w 0 ° Ea 3 ^' r- -5 o
0. -� ° CL oo y O
T O tD ',.R n �< w �' �i C° w w n '�. ^ y! y^ O O �• O
w a. a ar S y A r O C 00r p.v
C5 CD
s y— .+ c y fD w o cn
a <ac�D ZC �'fD �� moo° eo�a03 00 ° ; 3�c^
a' c 'a w (D n CD CAD ^ G O C ^= 3 CD
y a
w 'O �• O O ..
N O C. y Q L7 "t7 O C y CD .� ^
m C ^° tro �+ "1 o J o "0.� -3a c O^,•c CD
CD o .. 0 °
I 3 o
CD =� C 0 Q� CD w 1 0 3' o� a3 � y cao
ro co ;-.
o`< y y c S GY C�0 w w ��G �y
y CD CD ' w ro Z
ca. 0o b CoD v°i BOcG D �•'a O C� D
co OQ AD 0
C a 0 o m m Cr CD -0 -0 >
o P 0 CD
CD
C a
Ce O w O< y O ►�i `< <D O. O CD b 0" 3 O p'
w w
� woo 0 0 R.
c co w< o' c o r
0 CA
y� a•S� =.a y 0.0 cy w.o�D C n �`< o
oIfro� °s
CAD y, C Co OC c v< y m fo
O ?a Z3 C .a
°vCL G
M. a, yo?:
CD
CD
co
CD
.E
co
CD
Me
mo E a •"" w 'S' o. ;�7 ..o Cr1 ' S' w—_ y. G w w A ems o p" 1 m G m CO
�CD D Z 2 'o y o= C5 a,F o •0 r =D mad o.c?D q y �_
`w Q �- , CD
co
ay m o^^aa` o'S ^B = c CD•oo
CD CO c CD
H m y m y DO w CD n n. p. ^.00M
CD 0
CD y y y ^. .�.. y (^p C i( ��-. y O 0 fb
CD
•Si ..• h (1 p7 y '►I O ° y ^ � ca V CD 0 <<: y .w^. ^ [`.t< .y CD d
CD O< p C .°y y w O Cep ++ y p 00 ^ p' n ~ a .•,. w O tD 'L w w O -0 ca O •o o m �.^p
o y o o 2. �g n 0.y BCD y' .w. CD 3 0.�.:• ;�
py�E oo=+ a °- �ooCD w ��
CL
m m °< S o o_ 0 o w f D CD r. r a p n o0
O 'O c� ��! e� �D �' C µ' cD = F C 9 O <. m � O
CD O° < O w = n ^ p" O O m `' o. O w C w Go
y d
O On C D C n ' O =7 O m w C T °
O CD CD y
.. OQ sa •v wCD a awmy�'oaa,
FL F b �8�CD ° wCDbm`.1.y�
w iD ��,a m^° �u�'�aefDea�n
a y fD CD ° �. .. �• w cD a m w o
'.
QaCD <' yw o c��w 0 � o�.o��
CD
CD
co
y C7 W (7 CO CO O D oo c 11 Z n :� o m C^rf N Z D .m. n w w
cD = (7 < O Ai .,
0 CD
c w o m aDcD c^c << a f fD o
�a M�' c o�CD d R=.w 3m om r =:E 0 0 tiC� CL
y yy .jy ooh
CD CD
CD CD
CD CD
3= -- D cnn H y ao S
W CfDD a Q °a a �] 3 m o i- w y m"Ty y y
=;w B ., °
oD o w � TCD
C7 n cr c CA w w cD
Cnn
CD
rA w '+ N• J' N rQ O ,a D O w w< < I
ca CD CD
H y O p Z w c�D w C CD y ° m
w '" ° —gym o w ma•'� y
IV �_ " >
° B � n °- any ^ �
o . CD CD
n CD
d w= O go o
c ro _ w r*l .�. �' wi y n ... O G m GD
o ° m CD CD CD a In.
cr c��o cD °= r° a �, aD � =D- ° B
b CD m o cD CD
O O y' C CD
CD CD
O CD y Ct C L p `� r7 f^D B f
CD O fDD
ro
n CD
y y
SD
U3
CD
0
-v
co
CD
CD r a CD vi� A
a
CD y��� •_
CD
�va�D o
w v� 2 w M
CA
.ti y ...
CD i� b
a�`D
�w Zy^o
O�CY0 -,
my :
0 CD
n o y.y ►��yl n, Co
0 y J W N N
NI r•r 'zi
Q 7dZ0
C :•i � w CD
0 w
O
CD OQ
cr
CD
CD
a
w y y
�-D
0
cod
on c
v
� t�D Q•
�+ C
0
o
CIO o
v0, c3D
0
Er
N
� N
Z
N
o
o c c
o• w
N
CD
CD N
CD
CD �.
C
G y
°
CD.
o
y
c y°=°�e
a
cr O
N w
o
N
• C
�
ty N
CD
CIO o C
- 0 ;' 0.
.r
4
cr
`< = -h Oy
O
(D O
m
w w �
�
OQ
w
Ir•C
C �.
N CD
CD
CD r a CD vi� A
a
CD y��� •_
CD
�va�D o
w v� 2 w M
CA
.ti y ...
CD i� b
a�`D
�w Zy^o
O�CY0 -,
my :
0 CD
n o y.y ►��yl n, Co
0 y J W N N
NI r•r 'zi
Q 7dZ0
C :•i � w CD
0 w
O
CD OQ
cr
CD
CD
a
w y y
�-D
0
cod
on c
v
S
0 °
a�
o
'0
r, N rn
0 .== w 'O
Er
C
Cb n
^•
N
o
cD
0
m
co
0 et
^
SfD
CD �.
�•�'
°
CUD
w
o
a
c y°=°�e
0
N w
CD
N
• C
CD
CD y
0
w
o
c o
c
C)
C S
O
,a•
w
Ir•C
C �.
^'
CD Oa0 p'
G
L H
CD
o
a.. �° ow
'
CD o
^
20 :2
O
O
Q
C
o
Go y
�
w
CD r a CD vi� A
a
CD y��� •_
CD
�va�D o
w v� 2 w M
CA
.ti y ...
CD i� b
a�`D
�w Zy^o
O�CY0 -,
my :
0 CD
n o y.y ►��yl n, Co
0 y J W N N
NI r•r 'zi
Q 7dZ0
C :•i � w CD
0 w
O
CD OQ
cr
CD
CD
a
w y y
�-D
y•9�nB n51
rn
ci
b y aQ
CD
'+ Q a
CD
a• ° Go 'o CD
Oo g ^
CD �co co
CD
SD Qo' y cOn ^. CD
co w Q Q R
La
o b o+ n o
0 c0i
ID
C N C
�. 0
h CD
0 .•:.— C W
or,wo
CD
� p Sum M
" T cD
cD -�
O �
C7 �
a?
o
0 0 0
aLID
Fj
n
C
t �
A
o N
CD
CDr �
0
y
CCD N
CD r
N
y
C
N
w � a
o
O ^ ^'
V y
a � d
CL ?
CD
y o rn
w ° c<D
o c
cr r
3�n
w w n'
o a
o y
o o.
p, O
^o
O � V
co ^°o
�.
.c.�
0
w 0 0
0
o'•
c
c
C
0
�cr A
oo
°
00
to
Ca�RL
—
'n
0 °
w N
C o
0
b
'0
0
0 .== w 'O
N Q
CD
w
S cr = 0
cD
O
0
S
o
^
SfD
�•y y0Q
�•�'
°
CUD
w
.0
a
c y°=°�e
rA
CD
rA
CD y
O
owo`�
(IQ
c o
0
N 0 CD
w
CD
.N.
j
.n
y C 0,
R M. R CD
^'
CD Oa0 p'
o
b O 0.^O
5
o
a.. �° ow
8 Q w
^
20 :2
OQ
C
o
Go y
SD
y•9�nB n51
rn
ci
b y aQ
CD
'+ Q a
CD
a• ° Go 'o CD
Oo g ^
CD �co co
CD
SD Qo' y cOn ^. CD
co w Q Q R
La
o b o+ n o
0 c0i
ID
C N C
�. 0
h CD
0 .•:.— C W
or,wo
CD
� p Sum M
" T cD
cD -�
O �
C7 �
a?
o
0 0 0
aLID
Fj
n
C
t �
A
o N
CD
CDr �
0
y
CCD N
CD r
N
y
C
N
w � a
o
O ^ ^'
V y
a � d
CL ?
CD
y o rn
w ° c<D
o c
cr r
3�n
w w n'
o a
o y
o o.
p, O
^o
O � V
co ^°o
�.
.c.�
0
w 0 0
0
o'•
c
c
C
0
�cr A
oo
°
00
k
-�
r
'n
S
? S a
'0
0
0 .== w 'O
r
CD
Z
cD
O
G
�
caD m �•o f�
�•�'
n�
'
� nC
b
�a�
=
(�
°
^
a0
t"
cD <
c. w w !w�
C
Q w
CD
o
c 0
--
7d
'O
LID
eD w
^3a
C
oCD
ci
y o
a
CD °
o<<
.°
?
CD
v
d
^'
CD CD A
w
D7
II
O
r. -wi
a. CD
00
yCO
CD O
rZr
a
eebb 8
��.
°e °
CND w
Co
-w, to
r
o
�rinRCD
o�
�v,
<
O N
R c'
O =PC
QQ
I
d
0
c0
CO
ANc
°
macro
at o
ana
Q
m
ra
CSN x
0
�'
w
0
p
° 0
n°
o
A A
CD
o
w
d w
0
0 y.
°
C
0 w0
7r
rA
y
0
CD R "'
C
C'
°
�.
°
< c
r. CD
vi
3
Co
S
y•9�nB n51
rn
ci
b y aQ
CD
'+ Q a
CD
a• ° Go 'o CD
Oo g ^
CD �co co
CD
SD Qo' y cOn ^. CD
co w Q Q R
La
o b o+ n o
0 c0i
ID
C N C
�. 0
h CD
0 .•:.— C W
or,wo
CD
� p Sum M
" T cD
cD -�
O �
C7 �
a?
o
0 0 0
aLID
Fj
n
C
t �
A
o N
CD
CDr �
0
y
CCD N
CD r
N
y
C
N
w � a
o
O ^ ^'
V y
a � d
CL ?
CD
y o rn
w ° c<D
o c
cr r
3�n
w w n'
o a
o y
o o.
p, O
^o
O � V
co ^°o
�.
.c.�
0
w 0 0
0
o'•
c
c
C
0
�cr A
oo
°
00
�Q
CD
N
CD
1
co
0
0 d Q
Bae
-�
oa,��rr
O
0
C D
CD
CD
co
CD
C y m O
-�
O <
b
Z
C O O^ D
Cp
W
y y
to rr C C. m
CD
'fl
CCD ° B ry
cr
0
C_
O
c
0
to
/r
O
N
z° *
0
-�
°;a
O
., z
m
CD
-�
n n
A
to rr C C. m
W
'fl
CCD ° B ry
cr
0
C_
0 00
0
to
/r
O
W
C
�
C
Z m
CD n
0) 0 "" o
o D
C/1
9 .
o
i y. ^? ^ m
►d
�
m r^t. =O •p y G1
-.
r D
o
C17 -
CA
O C
3
CO
wCD go —+
�a°o p.o
oo
^sF�_
CD
CJ
CD
c,y
iD
b CD
ti � a
0CCD:.mcD
cp
�dc
CD
C
m
CD
CD
°
^^z
4t
o fD P m
cnD
o
as
R
y
G
o
0
CD R c
° _ m o zi
rrf "
x
W
so
H
•
co
OQ <D a
A7
Vl
r 0 O a P�
0, (D r_
�.
Dn
^ O C/i
Co CD
to
C
A fD W D
lv
rn (D CO
19. ° O
ID
%
y
�' 'a 0
A� 7
° C
O CD f
CS
ti
CD
fD y O ^
CD
^
At O
(Z
M
0..�
CD
00
CD
,0
cr co CD 0
co
0
CD 0
m-,
rL
LV
N
a
cD 0- 0
R
i y.3�� -•
0
to 0
W
^ 5 :E
2 p. �
rA
to
Q. CD
CD
O
O^
CD - C
0.
0
? S C
O f
° �• '� • B f�D
CD CD
.^.. C'
co fD
S cD y
PC 0 CD
cr
CD 0
" r O
CL CD y S
O CD
O
w
=.ra�D
wry �n
Go
to
O n• cd, C sv
0. C3 to Cy
^
C O A
0 "' CCD
.A
re3 VJ 06 CO
y
0+
N
z° *
0
-�
°;a
O
., z
m
CD
-�
n n
A
cr
0
C_
0
CD
/r
O
W
C
�
C
Z m
CD
CDCD
C17 -
CA
ti
H
°
r.
O
cc
iD
cp
�dc
CD
•-3.
y
°
^^z
4t
E
�CC'
m
R
y
G
CD
•
rrf "
x
W
S
H
•
0.
O
CD
Al
CD
m
CD
T
CD
M
CD
,0
N
CD
(Q
CD
J
cn
0 � 3tnUO v W B a•19 o
< . ='a F-0
o CD y o06tA
:.o oio^
w Cfl e p a o O 1 CO tz c oil "n -3 eo '' co O?
a' we d C<D y �� y07 �, w 0 O .. cao v a
A f�9 O n 7• a. Q' C .. :1. O O
m al
c I � ,CD w .'! a y a CO c o _ +
y O B y
C O Ul
CD CD m -, rA
CD = ° w ^.00 CD ww -O w w c"°o CD °�' Q� a' c m w a
CD CD in
w CD CO CD
CD
O " O a CS 4' O O y Ci O ° ^ ',1 .� ^ CD a
T= p =r CO co y ° a CJ CD
_
< _
O
CD 'Z O
CD ° D O (p 4 ^y
' -t " CD w n
C
W r4
cr
a O O cD O v a O p tD w :. w CD
y Zaa > UQ CD 'O° a ° te a
m y a cD n v g
W CD
O O CD O O T S a y ': c a- co ..
C<D�o. a,,TR ��vey�°;w a °; o ;' •°;pCDCfDiZ
aCf w CD a �ti C°D ^ o m "�� .» eD O Z� c
O A O O ° o qQ CD CD 0 7 CD w cD
CL GQ
CD ate, _- a ~ ,o ° -CDi ° CD
C
a w 7 w CD .O .w7 y CD a.
M, CD a CD w CD
CD CD W
° CD a �,
y0o o 0 ay CD w yb pvx
ooCD co x0 �Ca
c�D aW ?�Cn v
CD 'n cr
CD
p ;;
SCDO����
cr
"; y .� .Wi CD CO n Q• ,.; CD m a
n �. o Z C7 Z n E� d ?1'° CD =^ c m CL m w
F5 0 go 0
CD
c C7 CD w •o °
'v 'M n CD ='.O p `°' < I c o y CD
0 CD n < ao ° fD 'o CD w
?a s� CO X w c C 3 ?7��? N ao C3 p w CD CD CD '' T C.CD + a a = n m = aQG • a '� 'o CD p a p fa o w m a CD Cw a ^ < R O O CD
.o " <° ' a M o < Co CO
C o = CD p C
CO
a y n a<
n m fD '?. A� O O Q. y' .-. �, c"D C CD •^ N
�. w —
tra p vo < a o
g �7 cy y
c p
m o =b iDo on��..yC
_ 3°o as 3 °-= -,yor. e '':ri,v"cr
`< S c p w ry w C ?�•p; <= w 3 m'� _ ��,CD p p
. n p`G
a a 0 %<< CD w a CD M W a O CD 0 t a y v y = y'
�• ... CD 7 =, ate, CD A "m �'°' n0 G r.^ CD CD ca.
23 Ca w " x CD a fD ° CrnaR Z
a w :-,
a
At c o= w^ O A O .� � B
Y CD
Co W tCD CD O
CD -t CD CD
a d ? w y v CD cn
CD y
�o
rf
73
m
cQ
m
J
V
0 0 rrE4
n
.
y
CD
a-
m•
'
D CD :'i C n
C CD R•
�'
9
m
y R YOQ
fD
_
co
CD
r
D
CD
=
R
R
3 ^' 'ri • CT CD
^Y CD y
CD 0
�•
Dta n�o�
> a 0 O
Oti
R D V%
O'
3'A Ca9 -.m
rLw
b
cr
CL
CD
M
CD
D j a' CD
0
CD
C
O
Y C a
p O R CCD
":
O
3 J 'S v' -CD
T Co
ti
O p m
r
m CDDt CD
O
,T
O
R
�CD O CD
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK
co
v
m�
ca
•O 3
s
-., v
�a
c,
�o
�a
a3
10 v
-a
cfl
CD
f
00
sv
CD
co
o
yo .. n ° a�O� n mc y yfD 0� o ��a ,t �W
� 0
c 0n
CD CD
o o n. w. < w
c p � CD
"CD C =° y ° Y°
D CL 1 m ' .n
oc°'vo Q00 "a oo�tDO n tnW ca �°'`<ma�
-y y O y F v
;D ca In 0 - .
f
O ' y pp o v " n
D q• fD y O ,G A Co a CD O � � CD Qo w � y Cr l 'n � 3y
�
f 7 QO v (D
_ -o y CD CD o r�.
D w so Co y C N � C QQ 'C O �. Cb CD CL A b O n• y, — p r? "d •
00 W CD < CD C D .4 w , Co '
a CD y d O ,^ n 0 p- ,wit 0. 0 ^ .a. O O rn CD
D
CL a 0 c o y y fD fD > fD x CD o, rD. cr
�i o a Q0 w 3
CD �. y ': �. .y w p ^. G1 C �i p S
D w CL w O a ci n 9 O G �, O 1 d O a. -• CD CL 9
CD a C. �. CD y y O �• ^. �, y �f�•D C vii X ti n_
"Q Go y• y. r .C.t .T 0 y '•'� V, N a T% O fD
••' rn w
•p CD c m m p= < w' 7 p- c CD r. r•. bd Cro w^ C.
W c. CD y o` , W �� R aCD y ~QC o °^
CD CD 0 CD CD 0
0 QQ m w CCD CD d 0 0 y fA y 0 0 PC � c m �. 77. m f < o w .3 o CD o w w °' < o p O O y
C n C y a ^w<. CD CL p y p. W CD
f D a -�
CD ^['f w CD .w... ;� w Oo Cro Z') ""+
>fwo>e�o� c� �oow WTI '+ ��Ct� noel �f<DCrJ
'+ 't
• 0• < y• CD w p y fD o a CD CD y' � bo Z -', "'= H a
O r. a ^. a' T y y d y p o ^ 'w•. a' A f�D O' CD CD
a O C W fOD CD y o O `< GO a w tD c* < CD C.
o c co CD W n CD y cD Sao 00 0 c 3a �__? CD CL o � r_;^ ° cr
s << o = ..3 �. " ° CD w c uM '° 0 CD c =- y w y CD t'
_ 0 0
CD F i o °c^ 0 7r s n n cf DD o y CD H ; n fD CD
`^° fo c c Cl. �� �, o cr p CD .. n
0 � w a' �- O CD CD O D• A =
CD CD y C f n O cr
CD O c "t CO O O .
0 IN
CD n
p CD
ti CD �, CCDD a 0 CD CD co w
y d w y vyi O. CD ° O CD Co CD p, y r:
S o. ° y aro ° O CD m' Q b a
d. a' CD °' O a N O y y a. CD O
CD 0 CD
.. c
rA O A
C C N y a'
O y o y 'COD f0 CT
y � . O C y fp
O ? e+ y 4. y El k 0
D H y ^ y wTj C w w a .
w f
CD fD w
= CD 2 -� w
y p CD w a p CO w O CN �
.
O' o- °
LT
a
N
7C
y
m
m
N
n�
CD
N
1
O �J
d ~ w� d o�� ?° 0c c�w•wo0= c
va o b0 �Y
w fD A co �• CD N• iD y =
a y w °-< � R a �° o
"O n cDg ao w a Cw L
a �w
•
coca ogoa V.0 ❑_ 00w ° •a° caD N'�^ o aw CD
ofD:°..n' 03 CD y
o R �s' n rj " E a c
owa. °Evo•0 z
CA O
z
O .Z• Ra _ a_ s • .R <. 3 "�'� w A 'C7 w a , ,R
CD w � f O CD
c �O ..•. t� D o
.0 m
CD In CL
� � .O O 0 0 0
.1Z n Qa
CD fD A CD ,.• CD -� O O
mao ° c 0
CD
� � ^ c CL y �0°. =
CD p
00
fD w O R N `<• y c $ �+• .y... O •� fD
CL
a c w a cD O a a 0 < d
O f/ CA
0_w ate`' �� a0a-o c �• rA wO
a• 1• a w a 0 w ,� y ,� "�' At 'O "fDt _•'•d
R
w o m p r' y etc m CD _' w S ^,
O' fD•
CD C O w C• N R y a (p y vi O <<
(D CD '_' •' .b +COO y O O << P
< �v y 'o o a"30a a a.x ?CD �'
a' O CD w
w0 ° �i o coo o a oa
y CD w E ., n a a w ,.
CD C R y r ? G CO
CA
N 0
N
�O 0rr wo°z orr 0g3 air• ox c
CL
CD z
W c w 0 O r o 0 o a n
< R •J• R
CD CD 0
CDC y n• CD o O y 0 M c^p O w (� C
0 0 n z n VJ ►• - a R
0 V CD
R ^
y R• y = n A R 0 J,
w " O C CD w O 0- 0 D
o CD o cR c cfl •
° co
fD fD w
SD
-, `e 0 rA '+ cD
w a A` �' Q' a O CD K 'n '_' (D a• O .y ,,,, Oro CD m w
�CD `<B�`D= CD oyao xa `° �
° CCD ?: -, "•O. w " C y a•t�9 7s'c•f9b M Gi; c<D
�f a� ° a° o., o•d R 0 Cho v,
O y Q, w m. w CD CD N w �--� Am D• � � 7 n F O
?° S 0 CD a° a a n y a w �. C R
CD
CD �D� `,,, °+o ~ate ^0 �0y o� .
w o w 0 a y
c^D =� 0 R co O w 00 y 0 0 ^ O b O O C d
cD CL 0 E a R CD y "y w cD 3 w w
w O 0 a c� a3. 0 w << y' 0 ro
C ti
w �°' O �S w" w 0 w a
CD a N M y 0 afD CO y m o �,7' a �. w n
R a a c 0. y
CD y O do !D E a ."'t M C a n O
3 5 — w
A) _ R
^ c c9 O O Co Vo fD cD 0 co
R. 0 m r• a
J
V17
ovA'4v
c ^�
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8059 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A USE PERMIT FOR INTERMITTENT TENT USE
AT MISSION PLAZA (TP 161 -92)
WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce applied to the City for authorization to erect a
tent on city-owned property at Mission Plaza on September 19, 1992, said tent to be used for
the "SLO EXPO" event, which would be open to the public; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 1992, the Council conducted a hearing to consider the Tent
Permit Application 161 -92, as provided in Section 15.24.050 of the Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approves the Tent
Permit Application based on the following findings:
SECTION 1. Approved Use of Tent
The tent may be used for the preparation and sale of food by vendors approved by the applicant.
SECTION 2. Findings
1. Occupancy of the tent structure for assembly purposes will not constitute a fire hazard,
if conducted in accordance with all provisions of the city's Fire Prevention Code.
2. The proposed tent will not be detrimental to public safety, interest, or welfare.
SECTION 3. Conditions:
1. Tent may be erected for a period of not more than three consecutive days for the "SLO
EXPO" event during the month of September each year. Thirty days prior to the
proposed event, the applicant shall notify the Fire Marshall, Community Development
Director, and Health Officer of the proposed dates. Notification shall be in writing, and
shall include information regarding proposed dates and times of the sale, and shall
include a copy of the approved site plan (Exhibit A). Any proposed changes to the
approved site plan or to the type of activity allowed by this use permit must be clearly
noted.
2. The use permit shall be subject to review by the Council, who may order a public
hearing if any of the following occur:
R -8059
Resolution No. 8059 (1992 Series)
Tent Permit 161 -92
Page 2
a. There are violations of any of the conditions of this use permit.
b. Changes are made to the site plan or the activities allowed by this use permit.
C. Written complaints from citizens or the Police or Fire Departments are received
by the Community Development Department.
d. the Council determines that conditions within the community have changed to the
. extent that. warrants further review at a public hearing.
3. Applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Uniform Fire Code.
On motion of Coundilmember Roalman ,seconded by Councilmember
RaDna , and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of September , 1992.
ayor Ron Dunin
A
City Qlerk Pam vo
Resolution No. 8059 (1992 Series)
Tent Permit 161 -92
Page 3
,•TB;• _6
City A ministrative Officer
Community Dedelo$ment Director
^,ti ♦ `e ' +'f t^�e�e! rwi.�`O ��• ate 4�.�q °
slir�� Q � 40 fy' � d \ ? yi+F'LyA+ „h `{n�5• -t'
y` S y, O � o� �� ae' + ;' e� �yf.•y A . Aim
' O +Y � �e ��,�se O � j �e +e �� der S r• •+ '� ,,
i O L aIq' y ej b.\ J ti�y7 v M/
to
4 0 d•y 4. r
for
O ��/ dl+fw• • � °° y� e e
w
pN' S
Id S
< a ? "•'�'f+ dr. L
c �
r � � .:• :: FiiiiS:��i;; :iiiiiif»i'��� o f eyd
¢ � .:e:eiiii '• '.::Fiei b �.O'e •.�J t:�: `•, +., Y.re ,
,;ti`:- FFi�i"''d i;i: reii` :••iiiiFFfi: . ° 4 ,,
g�+?E!t': ";;eiii�'.:;t;e ..... • . .:::.:: ;.�: • "fEeFe:. a� p = yr •'A,.� ! ; ` Qp �•.�
J•1 •Si1!
Me ... f;F :'e`'Ee, =:•••` y .•' r e•
ol
.FF, r•,sy ° 'L 's � •i•r
F :: ..Ri�Feffiiie +i ?ii •i ?:'� � d °' . �• , r' ". 1 d+ E e
ay�� f C+d'" ` � S:•at '•P`a - +•,, r. e. '�d'�� +' a b e << e"
PF° ■ ■'•° T , 6, 1 S�S � �'. ' + ^i �,w d• ++ q� Fi.
PA
+ • • V
I-V r ♦ , d'r�_ }�° , �• 04 rr *.I` �fi Pi' a+" + ,'• ^••`''}�`, `w`` i di p y>� y� � t f `' r � . �r
`,�. x.�c.'4` • �,r�t%' � 4di. oi°�yo •q 4' G,� �•i � +. O+ ~ 'a �'�1 ` �" � d"��y .,r / yt�
�I �d •, ` a�`�t `3yr�S`��ar, �^ + a � o, ` � �e'~ ,��+ +' �+ rd j':.,:.� .
E. a Vq. � SAY r �./ r. J 'T S
J� ..4rF a �e l > iS ° T� �y �' 0 1 :rri.fif ad r . d ,L {/ +' • r� . ^'e -
iR,• '7• •.yt +rr +.• irJ a �.i .+ 1` �y (t'" 6 'f 9i
aS� fit •ji�r +' .T \ ic, ,�� �s ,o,� *c,, R >,Y
=� 10 50 100 200 /_•`v\jpp �• v v+ •� +•• e >•+ �,� i¢ `
• \ ' � � ••a '�+ • ,•e a `�L �i
L qh dA
VICINITY MAP TP161 -92 NORTH
MISSION PLAZA
A
(Alwill, Vj
CA "CvV
RESOLUTION NO. 8058 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON A PORTION OF MILL STREET
BETWEEN BROAD AND NIPOMO STREETS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of .San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. It is the intention of the City of San Luis Obispo
to abandon a portion of Mill Street between Broad and Nipomo
Streets, as shown on the map marked Exhibit "A' attached hereto
and incorporated herein by such reference, pursuant to Section 8300
et. seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, and that the abandonment
shall be subject to the following findings, conditions, and code
requirements:
Findings
1. The portion of right -of -way to be abandoned is not needed for
present or future street purposes.
2. The proposed street abandonment is consistent with the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
3. The proposed street abandonment is categorically exempt from
environmental review under the City's Environmental Guidelines
and the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15301.
Conditions
1. An easement at least 20 feet in width shall be reserved for
emergency access, to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
2. An easement shall be reserved for public pedestrian and
bicycle access, to the approval of the Community Development
Director and City Engineer.
3. An easement shall be reserved over the entire area to be
abandoned for existing and future water, sewer, storm drain
and public utilities purposes..
4. Applicant shall prepare and submit a common access driveway
agreement to the City for approval and recordation which
provides access for large delivery vehicles and moving vans
R -8058
Council Resolution No. 8058 (1992 Series)
Page 2
to 570 Peach Street. The agreement shall be to the approval
of the City Engineer and affected property owners.
5. The applicant shall construct curb, gutter, sidewalk and
driveway ramps at the Nipomo Street and Broad Street
intersections (including necessary transitions from back of
driveway ramp to existing grades), in accordance with city
Standards, to the approval of the Cty Engineer.
6. Applicant shall construct a drainage way to conduct surface
run -off to Nipomo Street, to the approval of the City
Engineer.
SECTION 2. Copies of the map showing the particulars of the
proposed abandonments are also on file in the office of the City
Clerk, at 990 Palm Street.
SECTION 3. Tuesday, October 6, 1992, in the Council Chamber
of the City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California is
the time and place set for hearing all persons interested in or
objecting to the proposed abandonment, which time is not less than
fifteen (15) days from the passage of this resolution.
SECTION 4. This resolution, together with the ayes and noes,
shall be published once in full at least ten (10) days before the
public hearing on the proposed street abandonments, in the
Telegram- Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this
city.
SECTION S. The City Engineer shall post at least three (3)
notices of the proposed abandonments in prominent locations near
the portion of the street to be abandoned at least fourteen (14)
days before the date set for the hearing in accordance with Section
8322 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Council Resolution No. 8058 (1992 Series)
Page 3
SECTION 6. The City Engineer shall notify utility companies
affected by the proposed abandonments within ten (10) days after
adoption of the Resolution of Intention in accordance with Section
8347 of the Streets and Highways Code.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman , seconded by
Councilmember Rappa I , and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st
day of September , 1992..
ATTEST:
Vog— ess FYi �l
Council Resolution No. 8058 (1992 Series)
Page 4
APPROVED:
City Administrative Officer
Attachment: Exhibit A. Street Abandonment Map
D
r
V
o'
N I POMO
BROAD ST.
EXHIBIT A
o�
B�
0\
)&
7j) �
OY
CIA Cloy*
w
C' 0
RESOLUTION NO. 8057 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 2073
(L. Maksoudian, et al, Subdivider)
WHEREAS, the City Council.made certain findings concerning Tract
2673 as contained in Resolution No. 7036 (1991 Series), and
WHEREAS, all conditions required per Resolution No. 7036 (1991
Series) for Tract No. 2073 have been met.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that final map approval is hereby
granted for Tract No. 2073.
On motion of Councilmember Roalman seconded by Councilmember Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
September , 1992.
MAYOR Ron Dunin
ATTE % %
L/
CITI CLERK Voges
R -8057
Resolution No. 8057 (1992 Series)
Page Two
,_ . z• I 1
City EnSineer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
or A
.1 rmmlc 4 ff�Av
Iff
or
P: \jerry \T2073FM.wp
i
��L�
L;,,��' � � ��
��.� ��
�� ��
;�
RESOLUTION NO. 8056 (1992 Series)
Declaration of Co- sponsorship of the Graywater
Seminar, Titled Gray =Green 2
WHEREAS, water is California's most precious natural resource, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo has enacted legislation to
maximize water use efficiency in the City, and;
WHEREAS, the WateReuse Association of California and the California Department of
Water Resources are conducting a seminar to disseminate available knowledge about
graywater technology, on November 18, 1992, and;
WHEREAS, graywater is now generally recognized as a safe method of water
conservation under appropriate use conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo declares itself an official sponsor of the graywater seminar, titled Gray =Green
2.
Upon motion of Councilmember Pinard , seconded by, Councilmember Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
APES: Councilmembers Pinard, Rappa, Reiss, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted the 1st day of- September 1992.
s
ayor on unin
ATTES :
Pam V es, City Cler
APPRO
John i5u tityF Admini rative Offi er
f gens n, Ci Att ey
R -8056
����� ��
�.�
�1" c��
��
�.�
O n
RESOLUTION NO. 8055 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A TWELVE -MONTH TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT NO. 1673 LOCATED AT 3440 S. HIGUERA STREET
WHEREAS, The subdivider requests a twelve -month time extension to
complete processing of the final map; and
WHEREAS, reasonable progress has been made toward filing of
the final map; and
WHEREAS, the circumstances and findings of the original tract
approval are unchanged;
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council resolves as follows
Section 1. That Tract 1673 is granted a twelve -month time
extension, to August 15, 1993, subject to original tract map
findings and conditions as specified in City Council. Resolution
6667 (1989 Series), attached.
vote:
On motion of Councilmember Roalman , seconded by
Councilmember Rappa , and on the following roll call
AYES: Councilmembers Roalman, Rappa, Finard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 1st day of
September , 1992.
Mayor Ron Bunin
R -8055
Resolution No. 8055
Tract 1673
Page 2
APPROVED:
(1992 Series)
;;)��
City A inistrative Officer
1i
--y
RESOLUTION NO. 8054 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW GUIDELINES
CONCERNING AESTHETICALLY INSIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
The Council resolves as follows:
The City's architectural review guidelines (published as
"Architectural Review in San Luis Obispo "), section titled "which
projects need ARC approval," are hereby amended to read as shown
below. The Community Development Director shall cause the change
to be reflected in the documents published by the City.
"Architectural review is required for all building projects
in the city, except for the following:
1. Aesthetically insignificant projects. The
Community Development Director may determine that
a new small structure, a change or addition to an
existing building, or other site feature, has no
potential for conflict with the objectives of
architectural review due to -its size, location,
form, materials, and colors. In such cases, no
separate application or fee are required. The
determination will be noted in the project's
building- permit file, if any, or in the site's
address file.
2. Minor or incidental projects. The Community
Development Director may determine that work such
as a sign, a building addition or remodel, or a
new small structure is.minor, or incidental to a
larger,'previously approved project. Plans for
projects which an applicant believes are minor or
incidental are submitted for staff review, along
with an application and fee. The Community
Development Director decides within about ten'days
if the project must be reviewed by the ARC. If
not, the Director may approve the project, subject
to appropriate changes or conditions. The
Director's action may be appealed to the ARC.
3. Individually built houses. Plans for a single -
family house need.architectural approval only
.when: (a) required as a subdivision condition for
the lot, (b) an applicant proposes to build three
or more houses in the same area, or (c) the
Community Development Director determines the
location is a sensitive site."
R -8054
Resolution No. 8054
Page 2
(1992 Series)
10;
On motion of Vice -Mayor Rappa , seconded by Councilman Reiss
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice-Mayor .Rappa, Councilmembers Reiss, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilwoman Pinard
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th
day of August , 1992.
ATTES
City lerk Pam V es
APPROVED:
City A*inistrative Officer
Community Dev400ment Director
gmH: FAST- RES.WP
u
RESOLUTION NO. 8053 (1992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR MINOR
SUBDIVISION NO. 91 -192 LOCATED AT 1105 GEORGE STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo,
as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. 'That this council, after consideration
of the tentative map of Minor Subdivision No. 91 -192, and the
Community Development Director's recommendations, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. As conditioned, the design of the tentative map and proposed
improvements are consistent with the General Plan.
2.- The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in the R -2 zone.
3. The design of the tentative map and the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause serious health problems, substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the tentative map or the type of improvement
will not conflict with easements for access through, or use of
property within, the proposed subdivision.
5. The Community Development Director has determined that the
proposed subdivision will not have a significant effect on the
environment and has granted a negative declaration, and the
City Council hereby approves the negative declaration.
SECTION 2. Exceptions.. Approval of exception to required lot
dimensions width, depth, and size - based on the following
findings:
1. The property to be divided is of such size and shape that it
is impractical and undesirable in this particular case to
conform to the strict application of the subdivision
regulations.
R -8053
Resolution No. 8053
Page 2
C'
2. Site development standards are specified in the conditions of
approval to ensure site development that is representative of
and compatible with the scale and character of existing
development in the neighborhood, to ensure consistency with
the general plan; to enable adequate useable outdoor space; to
minimize the necessity for topographic modification; and to
ensure that the cost to the subdivider of strict or literal
compliance with the regulations is not the sole reason for
granting the exceptions.
3. The historic nature of the existing house, to be relocated
onto Parcel 1, merits exemption from the- square footage and
footprint limitations required for houses on Parcels 2, 3, and
4.
4. Granting the exceptions to the lot depth, width, and size
requirements will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, and welfare, or be injurious to other properties in
the vicinity.
5. Granting the exceptions to lot depth, width, and size
requirements is in accord with the intent and purposes of
subdivision and zoning regulations, and is consistent with the
general plan.
SECTION 3. Exceptions. Approval of exception to grading
standards, based on the following findings:
1. The exception hereby granted -- to allow grading of
approximately 63% of Parcel 2 and 42% of Parcel 3, exclusive
of building footprints, where the Grading Ordinance would
otherwise allow 20% -- is subject to such conditions as will
assure that the additional grading authorized shall not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations upon other properties in the same vicinity.
2. Because of special circumstances applicable to subject
property, including size, shape, topography, location, or
surroundings, the strict literal application of the grading
limitations is found to deprive subject property of privileges
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity.
3. Under the circumstances of this particular case, the exception
is in conformity with the purposes of the grading ordinance as
set out in Section 15.44.020.
SECTION 4. Conditions. That the approval of the tentative
map for Minor Subdivision No. 90 -286 be subject to the following
conditions:
n
Resolution No. 8053
Page 3
MS 91 -1921 1105 George Street
1. The subdivider shall submit a final map to the city for
review, approval, and recordation.
2. The existing house shall be relocated onto Parcel 1 prior to
final map approval.
3. The final map shall note that Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 are
determined to be sensitive sites, and that development on
these lots shall require architectural review prior to the
issuance of building permits. New development shall be
compatible with the prevailing character of the surrounding
neighborhood in terms of scale, massing, architectural style,
yards, and height.
4. Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be addressed as assigned by the
Community Development Department. Addresses for all lots shall
• be posted at the street frontage to the approval of the
Community Development Department.
5. All boundary monuments and lot corners must be tied to the
city's control network. At least two control points shall be
used and a tabulation of the coordinates shall be submitted
with the final map along with a 5 -1/4" computer floppy disk,
containing the appropriate data for use in Autocad for
geographic information system purposes.
6. The subdivider shall dedicate a 6 -foot public utility easement
and a 10 -foot street tree easement along all street frontages.
7. The subdivider shall provide street 'lighting per city
standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. The subdivider shall install standard frontage improvements
(6 -foot wide integral curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveway
ramp) and street pavement along street frontages to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. (4 -foot wide sidewalks are
approved for Ella Street; full street pavement required on
Henry Street; paveout required on George and Ella streets.)
9. The existing wall on George Street shall be removed from the
public right -of -way.
10. To ensure consistency with residential objectives contained in
the general plan regarding provision of adequate, private,
useable outdoor space, all parcels shall provide a minimum of
750 square feet of qualifying open space as defined and
described in Section 17.82.110 J, K, and L of the condominium
development regulations. To qualify as open space, yards
cannot exceed 5% slope..
A street yard of no less than 10 feet shall be provided along
r'
Resolution No. 8053
Page 4
MS 91 -192, 1105 George Street
the Ella Street frontage
allowing the applicant
requirement. Any struct
minimum of 20 feet from
Street. This condition
permit A100 -92.
of Parcel 3, for
to meet the
ure on Parcel 3
Ella Street and
shall supercede
•
the sole purpose of
minimum open space
shall be set back a
10 feet from Henry
condition 1 of use
11. To assure consistency with residential objectives contained in
the general plan regarding provisions for privacy, second
story decking shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the
nearest property line.
12. To better ensure that site development is compatible with the
prevailing single family residential development in the
neighborhood, which is primarily single story, the absolute
maximum height, measured from finished grade to the highest
point on the roof, for buildings on each of parcels shall be
25 feet.
13. To ensure continuity of neighborhood character in terms of the
scale and pattern of existing development, and to minimize the
need for grading on the sloped portion of the site, consistent
with the intent of the city's subdivision and grading
regulations:
a. Building footprints on Parcels 2 and 3 shall be
limited to a maximum of 1,250 square feet;
b. Development. on Parcels 2 and 3, for which an
exception to the slope /density reduction standard
is being requested, shall be limited to a maximum
building area of 1,800 gross square feet, including
garage space.
C. Development on Parcel 4 shall be limited to a
maximum building area of 1,800 gross square feet,
including garage space.
Provisions of the condition shall supercede condition.3 of. use
permit A100 -92.
14. Consistent with the City's density standards, development on
each of the four parcels shall be limited to 1 two- bedroom
house.
14. Conditions 10 through 14 shall be noted on the final map, and
the subdivider shall submit CC &R's for each of the parcels
created to the Community Development Director :for review,
approval, and recordation, which clearly describe the noted
conditions.
Resolution No. 8053
..Page 5.
MS 91 -192, 1105 George Street
15. All trees to be removed as a result of site grading and
development are to be replaced at a ratio of two to one to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director and the
City Arborist.
16. The two Coast Live Oaks, which are otherwise .proposed for
removal, shall be hand dug by qualified personnel, burlapped
and balled, and relocated on.the site to the satisfaction of
the City Arborist.
17. The planting of street trees shall be deferred until after
site grading and lot development are completed to avoid
damaging newly planted trees.
SECTION 5. Code Requirements. The following are required by
city codes, but not all code requirements are listed:
1. All structures on Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be equipped
with automatic fire sprinkler systems.
2. All applicable water and sewer fees shall be paid prior to
building permit issuance.
3. Street trees shall be installed to city standards and to the
satisfaction of the City Arborist.
4. The subdivider shall install individual sewer, water, and
utility services for each parcel. New utilities shall be
underground.
5. New lot corners shall be staked by a registered civil engineer
or licensed land surveyor.
6. The subdivider shall pay park -in -lieu fees as determined by
the Community Development Department prior to final map
approval.
7. All lots must be sewered to Either Ella or George streets.
On motion of Councilmember Rappa , seconded by Councilmember Pinard
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Pinard, Reiss, Roalman, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 8053
Page 6
MS -91 -192, 1105 George Street
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of
August , 1992.
Mayor Ron
ATTEST:
City CQ.erk, Pam
APPROVED:
ty Ad 'nistrative Officer
Aw
Jk
V-
0
RESOLUTION NO. 6667 (1989 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO GRANTING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP FOR TRACT 1673
LOCATED AT 3440 SOUTH HIGUERA STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findines. That this council, after consideration of the tentative map of
Tract 1673 and the Planning Commission's recommendations; staff recommendations and
reports thereon, makes the following findings:
1. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are consistent with the
General Plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in a
GS zone. i
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause
serious health problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially and
unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. '
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
5. The Community Development Director has determined that the proposed subdivision will
not have a significant effect on the environment and has granted a negative
declaration.
SECTION 2. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map for Tract 1673 shall be
subject to the following conditions:
1. Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC &R's) for the tract shall be approved by
the Community Development Director and shall contain the following provisions:
a. Property owners association shall be created to enforce the CC &R's and provide
for professional, perpetual maintenance of common areas including, but not
limited to driveway, parking lot, landscaping, utilities and building exteriors.
b. Grant to the City of San Luis Obispo, the right to maintain common areas if the
property owners association fails to do so, and assess said association for
expenses incurred.
c. All parking spaces provided in the project shall be available for use by all of
the individual owners. The parking lot at the northeast corner of the site may
also be used by the public for access to San Luis Creek and related recreation
uses.
d. Ownership of air -space units shall be limited to not more than 19 separate
ownerships. Ownership of air - space units shall not be sold or otherwise
transferred in such a way as to conflict with any law or regulation, including
but not limited to city fire and building codes.
R 6667
Resolution No.
Tract 1673
Page 2
6667 (1989 Series)
0
e. There shall be no change in city - regulated provisions of the CC &R's without
prior approval of the City Council.
2. Subdivider.shall provide individual water services for each unit: Meters shall be
clustered to the approval of the Community Development Director and the City
Engineer.
3. Subdivider shall provide individual gas and electrical services and metering for each
unit to the approval of affected public utility agencies and the City Engineer.
4. Final map shall note a blanket easement over the common lot area, except under the
structures, for underground public utilities serving the site, to the approval of the
City Engineer and affected utility companies.
5. The subdivider shall record a common access driveway and shared parking easement
agreement for Lots 1 and 2, to the approval of the Community Development Director.
As an option, the subdivider may combine Lots 1 and 2 to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
6. Prior to final map recordation the subdivider shall pay, or arrange to pay the city
for the cost of equivalent standard curb, gutter and sidewalk along the Prado Road
frontage on or adjacent to the Prado Road Bridge.
7. Subdivider shall combine the southern most driveway with the existing driveway
serving the Tenwise Commercial Center. If negotiations are unsuccessful between the
subdivider and Tenwise property owner the City Council shall reconsider this
requirement and either pursue condemnation to secure the common driveway or delete
this condition altogether.
8. All buildings within the project shall be fire sprinklered to the satisfaction of the
City Fire Marshal.
9. Prior to building permit issuance, the subdivider shall submit for review and
approval by the Community Development Director a trip reduction plan to minimize the
use of private automobiles to the extent feasible.
10. Exiting vehicles from the northerly parking lot shall be restricted to right turn
(southbound) only egress. Methods for traffic restrictions, such as signage,
striping and channelization, shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Community Development Director prior to building permit issuance..
On motion of Councilwoman Rappa . seconded by Counc.i1woman Pinard
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Rappa, Pinard, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilman Settle
ABSENT: Councilman Reiss
Resolution No. 6667 (1989 Series)
Tract 1673
Page 3
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15th day of Augmst
1989.
Mayor Ron Dunin
ATTES
V
City erk Pam Vo e
APPROVED:
Community Development Director
������ e >�'c`v
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8052 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING AND RATIFYING THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 1992 -
JUNE 30, 1994
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
Section 1 The Memorandum of Agreement between the City of San Luis
Obispo and the San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association, attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted and ratified.
Section 2. The Finance Director shall adjust the Personnel Services
appropriation accounts to reflect the negotiated compensation changes.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a copy of
the executed Memorandum of Agreement approved by it to: Tim Girvin, President
SLOCEA; An McPike, Personnel Director; William Statler, Finance Director.
On motion of Vice -Mayor Rappa , seconded by Councilman RoalmaD
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES -- Vice -Mayor Rappa, Councilmembers Roalman, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of August, 1992.
R -8052
(A- 88- 92 -CC)
N
Resolution No. 8052 (1992 Series)
Page 2
ATTEST:
Cil Clerk Pam tges
APPROVED:
City dministrative Officer
A or y
Y Finance Director '
Personnel Director
0
ayor Ron unin
,VIP
A- 88 -92 -CC
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AND THE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION
JULY 1, 1992 - JUNE 30, 1994
\
A-88-92-CC ($ Rg�S
o
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Article No.
Ti le Paae No.
3
1
Parties to .Agreement ..................
1
4
2
Recognition ...........................
2
5
3
Term of Agreement ... ............ ...
3
4
Renegotiation .........................
4
6
5
Salary .. .... .....................
5
7
6
Salary Survey. Agencies ..................
9
7
Overtime .......... . ..............
10
8
8
Longevity ....................... ..
12
9
9
Education Incentive ....................
14
10
10
Standby ...... ............. ......
15
11
Callback .............................
16
11
12
Work Out -Of -Class .....................
17
12
13
Temporary Assignment ..................
18
13
14
Payday .............................
19
15
Paychecks Prior To Vacation ..............
20
14
16
Retirement ...........................
21
15
17
Insurance and Refund ...... . .........
22
18
Retiree's Medical Insurance ...............
25
16
19
State Disability Insurance ................
26
17
20
Holidays .......... ..... ............
29
18
21
Sick Leave ..........................
31
22
Bereavement Leave ....................
35
19
23
Family Leave .........................
36
20
24
Vacation Leave .......................
38
21
25
Unplanned Vacation .....................
40
26
Workers' Compensation Leave ..............
41
22
27
Work Schedule .......................
42
23
28
Vacation Sell Back .....................
43
24
29
Americans With Disabilities Act ............
44
30
Transfer ............................
45
25
31
Layoffs .............................
46
26
32
Light Duty Assignment ..................
53
33
Class "17 Physicals ....................
54
27
34
Employee Lounge ........................
55
28
7
0
' l
1
35
Uniform and Uniform Allowance ...........
56
36
Safety Program .......................
57
2
37
Required Footwear .....................
58
3
38
Employee Rights ......................
59
4
39
Grievance Procedure ...................
60
40
Representative Role ....................
63
5
41
Committee Representation ...............
64
6
42
Dues Deduction .......................
65
43
Copies of Agreement . .........:.......
66
7
_.
44
Management Rights ....................
67
8
45
Peaceful Performance ...................
68
9
46
Full Agreement .......................
70
47
Savings Clause ........................
71
10
48
Authorized Agents .....................
72
11
49
Signatures ...................... ..
73
12
Appendix A ..........................
74
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 1
PARTIES TO AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 18th day of August, 1992, by and
between the City of San Luis Obispo, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the
San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association, hereinafter, Association.
Nothing in this Agreement between the parties shall invalidate nor be substituted
for any provisions in City Resolution No. 6620 unless so stipulated to by
provision(s) contained herein and agreed to. ,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
O
ARTICLE 2
0
RECOGNITION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 et seq and City Resolution No. 6620,
the City hereby recognizes the San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association as the
bargaining representative for purposes of representing regular and probationary
employees, occupying the position classifications set forth in Appendix A, in the
General Unit with respect to their compensation, hours and other terms and
conditions of employment for the duration of the Agreement.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 3
TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall become effective upon adoption of Council, except that those
provisions which have specific implementation dates, shall be implemented on
those dates and shall remain in full. force and effect until midnight June 30, 1994.
0
3
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
ARTICLE 4
RENEGOTIATION
If the Association desires to negotiate a successor Agreement, then the Association
shall serve upon the City, during February of 1994, its written .request to begin
negotiations as well as its written proposals for such changes. Negotiations shall
begin within, but no later than, thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the
notice and proposals by the City.
F1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 5
SALARY
SECTION A Rules Governing Steo Changes
The following rules shall govern step increases for employees:
(1) The first step is the minimum rate and shall normally be the hiring rate
for the class. In cases where it is difficult to secure qualified personnel,
or if a person of unusual qualifications is hired, the Administrative
Officer may authorize hiring at any step.
(2) The second step is an incentive adjustment to encourage an employee
to improve his /her work. An employee may be advanced to the second
step following the completion of six months satisfactory service upon
recommendation by his /her department head and the approval of the
Personnel Director.
(3) The third step represents the middle value of the salary range and is the
rate at which a fully qualified, experienced and ordinarily conscientious
employee may expect to be paid after a reasonable period of
satisfactory service. An employee may be advanced to the third step
after completion of six months service at the second step, provided the
advancement is recommended by the department head and approved
by the Personnel Director.
(4) The fourth and fifth steps are to be awarded only if performance is
deemed competent or above as shown on the last performance
evaluation. An employee may be advanced to the fourth step after
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25II
26
27
28
completion of one year of service at the third step provided the
advancement is recommended by the department head and approved
by the Personnel Director. An employee may be advanced to the fifth
step after completion of two years service (one year for employees who
were at fifth step in one classification and then promoted to a lower
step in a higher classification) at the fourth .step provided the
advancement is recommended and justified in writing by the
department head and approved by the Personnel Director.
(5) The above criteria for step increases apply except where other
arrangements are authorized by the Administrative Officer.
(6) In applying the above rules, the next step shall be granted, other
conditions having been met, on the first day of the payroll period within
which the anniversary date occurs.
(7) Should the employee's salary not be increased, it shall be the privilege
of the department head and Administrative Officer to reconsider such
increase at any time during the year.
(8) Each department head shall be authorized to reevaluate employees who
reach Step 5 in their pay range. An employee who is not performing
up to standard for the fifth step shall be notified in writing that the
department head intends to reduce him one step unless his job
performance improves to an acceptable level by the end of 60 days.
Prior to the end of 60 days the department head shall again reevaluate
the employee and, as part of that reevaluation, shall notify the
C
I
1 employee if the pay reduction shall then become effective. The fifth step may be
2
3
reinstated at any time upon recommendation of the department head. If the
4 department head deems it necessary to again remove the fifth step during the same
5 fiscal year, he may make the change at any time with three business days written
6 notice.
7 SECTION. B "Y" Rating
$ An employee who is not performing up to established job standards may be "Y"
9
rated, freezing his salary until such time as there is an improved job performance.
10
11 The department head shall give 60 days written notice to any employee he intends
12 to "Y" rate, giving the employee an opportunity to correct any deficiencies. A "Y"
13 rated employee would receive neither step increases nor salary increases granted
14 by the City Council in a MOA resolution. The "Y" rating procedure shall not result
15 (then or later) in the employee being frozen below the next lower step of the new
16
range. For example, if an employee is at step D when "frozen his salary shall not
17
18 ever be less then the current step C by this action.
19 SECTION C Computation of Salary Range
20 Each salary range consists of five steps (1 through 5). Steps 1 through 4 equal
21 95% of the next highest step, computed to the nearest one dollar.
22 Step 4 = 95% of Step 5
23 Step 3 = 95% of Step 4
Step 2 = 95% of Step 3
24 Step 1 = 95% of Step 2
25 Each across - the -board % salary increase shall raise step 5 of range 1 by that %.
26 Step 5 of each successive salary range will be 2.63% above step 5 of the next
27
28 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1.0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23.
24
25
26
27
28
I�
lower range. After all step 5's of salary ranges have been established, each step
5 shall be rounded off to the nearest $1.00 and the remaining steps established in
accordance with the above formula.
SECTION D Salary Provision for the Term of Agreement
1 The parties agree to a salary increase as set forth below to be effective
on the first day of the first full payroll period in the month listed, for all
employees employed by the City on the effective date of the increases
beginning in July 1992.
July 1992 2.5%
July 1993 2.5%
2. Special Adjustments
In addition to the increases set forth above, the Police Records Clerk
classification shall be adjusted to range 210 effective the first day of
the first full payroll period in July 1992. The Police Records Clerk II
classification shall be adjusted to range 214 effective the first day of
the first full payroll period in July 1992.
K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
ARTICLE 6
SALARY SURVEY AGENCIES
Salary survey agencies shall continue unchanged when this MOA is renegotiated.
The parties agree that this survey shall only be one of the considerations used to
determine compensation..
6M
r
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
r
ARTICLE 7
OVERTIME
A. DEFINITION.
Overtime is defined as all hours ordered by management and worked by the
employee in excess of forty (40) hours worked in a work week.
Holidays and sick leave will be counted as hours worked for purposes of
overtime.
All overtime shall be authorized in writing by the department head prior to
being compensated.
B. COMPENSATION
Overtime shall be compensated in cash at one and one half (1 1/2) times the
employee's regular rate of pay, or in time off (CTO) at the rate of one and
one -half (1 1/2) hours for each hour of overtime worked.
r
All overtime shall be compensated to the nearest five (5) minutes worked.
C. COMPENSATORY TIME OFF (CTO)
An employee eligible for overtime compensation may elect compensation in
the .form of time off (CTO).
An employee shall be compensated in CTO only if the employee's department
head approved such compensation_. An employee may not be compensated
in CTO for more than sixty (60) hours of overtime worked in the calendar
10
.J
1 year. Accumulated CTO not taken within the calendar year, shall be
2
compensated in cash at straight time.
3
4
5 Such compensation shall be paid in January of the following year.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 J
26
27
28 11
1
2
3
4
5
.6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 8
LONGEVITY.
A. Employees with hire dates after December 31, 1973. Effective January 1,
1983, no employees will become eligible for longevity pay and employees
then receiving longevity pay shall receive no increases in longevity pay based
on additional service with the City.
B. Employees with hire dates prior to January 1, 1973. Each employee shall be
paid an additional one percent (1 %) of his base salary step following ten years
of continuous full -time service with the City. An additional one percent (1 %)
of base salary will be added for each subsequent five -year period, calculated
to the nearest one dollar ($1.00).
C. In the event an employee receiving longevity pay is not performing up to the
established standards set for the job, the department head with the
concurrence of the City Administrative Officer, may suspend payment of the
longevity pay until such time as the employee's work performance comes up
to the standard level, in the opinion of the department head and with the
concurrence of the City Administrative Officer.
D. The department head shall notify the employee in writing that he intends to
suspend the longevity pay unless the employee's job performance improves
significantly within a 60 -day period. If the employee's job performance does
not improve to the desired level by the end of 60 days, the pay reduction shall
then become effective. Longevity pay may be reinstated at any time upon
recommendation of the department head. If the department head deems it
12
1(
ll
1�
1�
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
O
necessary to again remove longevity pay during the same fiscal year, he may
make the change at any time with three business days written notice.
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
n n ,
ARTICLE 9
EDUCATION_ INCENTIVE
Effective January 1, 1983, no new employees will become eligible for education
incentive pay and employees currently receiving education incentive pay shall
receive no increases in education incentive pay based on additional education
received; except that, employees who, in the opinion of the department head, have
been working toward a degree which will make them eligible for education incentive
pay and will complete such work by December 31, 1982, shall be eligible for
education incentive.
14
1 ARTICLE 10
2
STANDBY
3 -
4 A. Standby duty is defined as that circumstance which requires an employee so
5 assigned to:
6 Be ready to respond immediately to a call for service;
7 Be readily available at all hours by telephone or other agreed -upon
8 communication equipment; and
9
Refrain from activities which might impair his /her assigned duties upon
10
call.
11
12 B. An employee assigned to standby by management receives Thirty Dollars
13 ($30.00) for each week day, Thirty -five Dollars ($35.00) for each weekend
14 day, and Thirty -five Dollars ($35.00) for each holiday of such assignment.
15 C. For a return to work as part of a STAND BY assignment, as defined above,
16
the City will guarantee either two (2) hours pay in cash at straight time or pay
17
at time and one -half for time actually worked, whichever is greater.
18
19 D. The parties agree that employees on standby, as defined above, are "waiting
20 to be engaged."
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 11
CALLBACK
A. DEFINITION
Callback is defined as that circumstance which requires an employee to
unexpectedly return to work after the employee has left work at the end of
the employee's workshift or workweek; or
Except that, an early call -in of up to two (2) hours prior to the scheduled start
or a workshift shall not be considered a callback.
B. COMPENSATION.
For an unexpected return to work, as defined in A above, the City will
guarantee either four (4) hours pay in cash at straight time or pay at time and
one -half for time actually worked, whichever is greater.
If an employee, who was called back and has completed his /her assignment
and left work, is again called back to work, he /she will not receive another
minimum if the return is within the original minimum.
16
o
1 ARTICLE 12
2
WORK OUT -OF- CLASSIFICATION
3
A. OUT -OF- CLASS ASSIGNMENT
4
5 For the.purposes of this article, an out-of-class assignment is the full -time
6 performance of all the significant duties of an available, funded position in one
7 classification by an individual in a position on another classification. An
8 employee assigned in writing by management to work out -of -class on a
9
position assigned a higher pay range and is vacant pending an examination or
10
is vacant due to an extended sick leave, shall receive five percent (5 %), but
11
12 in no case more than the fifth step of the higher class, in addition to their
13 regular base rate commencing on the eleventh consecutive workday on the
14 out -of -class assignment.
15
16
Employees assigned as project managers and thereby working out -of=
17
classification shall receive compensation pursuant to this section..
18
19
20 B. SEASONAL SUPERVISION
21 If, in addition to his /her regularly assigned employees, any employee
22 responsible for five (5) or more temporary workers for a period exceeding 10
23
consecutive work days shall receive additional pay of 5% commencing with
24
25 the 11th day.
26
27
28 17
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
N
ARTICLE 13
TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT
An appointing authority may temporarily assign an employee to a different position
for a specific period of time, after which the employee returns to his /her regular
duties and position from which he /she was regularly assigned. Such action shall
have the prior approval of the Personnel Director. An appointing authority may
assign an employee to a different position for a period of time not to exceed 90
days, provided the employee has received 24 hours written notice which includes
reasons for the assignment.
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
ARTICLE 14
PAYDAY
Paychecks will be disbursed on a bi- weekly schedule. Payday will be every other
Thursday. This disbursement schedule is predicated upon normal working
conditions and is subject to adjustment for cause beyond the City's control.
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 15
PAYCHECKS PRIOR TO VACATION
If an employee is taking vacation leave and wishes to receive his /her regular
paycheck before payday, the employee must notify the Finance Department in
writing at least two weeks prior to the start of vacation, provided the employee has
sufficient vacation time coming to cover the pay period.
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24'
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 16
RETIREMENT
A. The City agrees to provide the Public Employees' Retirement Systems's 2%
at age 60 plan to all eligible employees including the amendments permitting
conversion of unused sick leave to additional retirement credit and the 1959
survivor's benefit; and one year final compensation.
B. The City agrees to contribute seven percent (7 %) of an employee's salary on
behalf of the employee to PERS. These amounts paid by the City are
employee contributions and are. paid by the City to satisfy the employee's
obligation to contribute seven percent (7 %) of salary to PERS. An employee
has no option to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having
them paid by the City to PERS on behalf of the employee.. It is understood
and agreed to by the parties that the City "pick up" of the employee's PERS
contribution is made in lieu of a wage increase. Therefore, in all comparisons
made with other agencies, seven percent (7 %) of salaries will be added to the
total compensation provided by the City to the employees. It is further
understood and agreed to by the parties that payment of the seven percent
(7 %) PERS contribution is. made subject to I.R.S. approval of reporting
procedures.
21
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
.13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
ARTICLE 17
INSURANCE AND REFUND
A. INSURANCE BENEFIT FUNDING & REFUND AMOUNT
The City shall contribute the following amounts per month for medical, dental,
vision and life insurance for each regular, full time employee covered by this.
agreement and these amounts shall be used to calculate any refunds.
The City shall pay to each regular employee, on a bi- weekly basis (included in
regular paychecks), the difference between the City's actual insurance
contribution and the amount actually used by the employee for insurance
coverage.
Effective Date Amours
July, 1992 $285.00
December, 1992 $355.00
December, 1993 $395.00
B. INSURANCE COVERAGE
Each employee shall be covered by the medical, dental and life insurance.
If an employee selects dependent coverage, they shall have dependent
coverage for each insurance plan that provides dependent coverage.
If during an enrollment period an.employee selects dependent coverage, such
coverage shall apply to all eligible dependents and shall remain in effect at
least twelve (12) months or as provided by the applicable insurance contract.
The City will provide a minimum of thirty days notice of any medical plan rate
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G O
increase during the contract period.
C. LIFE INSURANCE
Employees in the General Unit shall have life insurance coverage of Twenty-
five Thousand Dollars ($25,000).
D. MEDICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE
The Association shall appoint two voting representatives to serve on a Medical
Plan Review Committee. In addition, the Association may appoint one non-
voting representative to provide a wider range of viewpoint for discussion.
The vote of each voting representative shall be weighted according to the
number of employees represented by the association.
1. DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE MEDICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE
a. review and suggest changes for the City's flexible benefits plan
and the insurance plans offered under the MOA
b. submit to the City and its employee associations
recommendations on proposed changes for the City's flexible
benefits plan and the insurance plans offered under the MOA
C. disseminate information and educate employees about the City's
flexible benefits plan and the insurance plans offered under the
MOA
d. participate in other "related assignments requested by the City
and its employee associations.
23
1 2. MISCELLANEOUS
2
a. The actions of the Medical Plan Review Committee shall not
3
4 preclude the Association and the City from meeting and
5 conferring.
6 b. No recommendation of the Medical Plan, Review Committee on
7 matters within the scope of bargaining shall take effect before
8 completion of meet and confer requirements between the City
9
and Association.
10
C. If Changes to the City's flexible benefits plan are subject to meet
11
12 and confer requirements, the City and the Association agree to
13 meet and confer in good faith.
14 d. In performing its duties, the Medical Plan Review Committee may
15 consult independent outside experts. The City Shall pay any
16
fees incurred for this consultation, provided that the City has
17
18 approved the consultation and fees in advance.
19
20 E. City agrees to pay for medical insurance coverage for two (2) pay periods in
21 the event that an employee has exhausted all paid time off due to an
22 employee's catastrophic illness. That is, the employee shall receive regular
23
City health payment benefit for the first two pay periods following the pay
24
period in which the employee's accrued vacation and sick leave balances
25
26 reach zero (0).
27
28 24
o
1 ARTICLE 18
2
RETIREE'S MEDICAL INSURANCE
3
4 A. Employees covered by this Agreement who meet all of the conditions set forth
5 below are eligible to.participate in the group medical coverage provided by the
6 City at group rate paid totally by the employee. The qualifying conditions are:
7 1. The employee must retire from City service, apply for and actually
8 receive retirement benefits through the City's retirement system.
9
2. The employee must be at least 50 years of age.
10
3. The employee must have at least ten (10) years of service with the
11
12 City.
13 4. The employee may have dependent coverage only for those dependents
14 covered for the last year of employment with the City.
15 5, All employee and dependent coverage will cease upon the death of the
16
employee or upon the employee reaching age 65.
17
B. The benefit only applies to employees who retired on or since January 1,
18
19 1983. This benefit shall continue beyond June 30, 1994, if, and only if, there
20 is mutual agreement of the parties to continue such benefit.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21'
22
23
25
26
27
28
``J
ARTICLE 19
_J
STATE .DISABILITY INSURANCE
A. COVERAGE
All employees shall be covered by State Disability Insurance (SDI).
B. COST OF SDI
The employee shall pay all costs of the program, which the City shall deduct
from employees' paychecks. Current costs are understood to be 1.20%
(.012) of the first $21,900 in annual wages.
C. ACCUMULATION OF BENEFITS
Time -in- service and other City benefits will only accrue when an employee is
on City -paid time.
D. COORDINATION OF BENEFITS
1. SDI payments shall be coordinated with accumulated paid time so that
take home pay will not exceed regular take-home pay. Paid time is
defined as vacation, sick leave, CTO, and holiday.
2. The coordination of payments will be administered by the City. The
employee must take his /her encashed SDI benefit check to Finance.
a. Determination of the use of paid time for coordination of
benefits, shall be made by the City. Employees on disability
leave shall be required to use all accumulated paid time prior to
using unpaid time.
b. Employees who receive SDI benefits shall receive credit for a
portion of the paid leave used to cover their absence. To
26
1 determine the credit, the amount of their SDI benefit shall be
2
divided by their base hourly rate multiplied by 1.4. The credit
3
4 shall be prorated if the employee has any non -paid time during
5 the pay period. To receive the credit, the employee.
6 must sign his /her SDI benefit check over to the City.
7 EXAMPLE: Employee uses 80 hours of sick leave.
8 Employee receives $384 from SDI.
9
Employee's hourly rate is $9.67.
10
1.4 x $9.67 = $13.54
11
12 $384 / $13.54 = 28.36 hours.
13 The employee receives a credit of 28.36 hours.
14 E. ACCRUAL OF BENEFITS WHILE ON SDI LEAVE
15 1. If an employee has no paid time at the beginning of a pay period, the
16
employee shall neither accrue vacation or sick leave, nor shall the
17
18 employee receive his /her regular City health payment benefit except as
19 provided in #3 below. To continue health insurance, the employee will
i
20 have to pay the entire cost of his /her health coverage for that pay
21 period.
22 2. If an employee has at least sixteen hours of paid time at the beginning
23
of a pay period, the employee shall receive his /her regular vacation and
24
25 sick leave accruals.
26 3. If an employee has any paid time.at the beginning of a pay period, the
27
28 27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27'
28
employee shall receive his /her regular City health payment benefit for
that pay period. For continuance of medical insurance see Insurance
and Refund, Article 17, Section F.
F. WITHDRAWAL FROM SDI
If this unit chooses to withdraw from SDI after the required two (2) years
membership, it must present a majority petition indicating such desire.
W
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
ARTICLE 20
HOLIDAYS
Effective calendar year 1993, the following days of each year are designated as
paid holidays:
January 1 - New Year's Day
Third Monday in January - Martin Luther King's Birthday
Third Monday in February - Washington's Birthday
Last Monday in May - Memorial Day
July 4 - Independence Day
First Monday in September - Labor Day
November 11 - Veteran's Day
Fourth Thursday in November - Thanksgiving Day
Friday after Thanksgiving
December 25 - Christmas
One -half day before Christmas
One -half day before New Year's Day
Two Floating Holidays
When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be observed. When
a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed. A holiday
shall be defined as eight (8) hours of paid time off for regular full -time employees.
Floating holiday accrual: An individual employed on a floating holiday (FH) accrual
date shall be credited with eight (8) hours of additional vacation. Use, carry -over,
29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
accumulation, etc. of such vacation shall be subject to the same rules and
procedures that cover all accrued vacation.
The two floating holidays will be accrued January 1 and July 1.
30
C O
1 ARTICLE 21
2
SICK LEAVE
3
4 A. Sick leave shall be defined as absence from duty because of illness or
5 off- the -job injury, or exposure to contagious diseases as evidenced by
6 certification from an accepted medical authority.
7 B. Rules governing sick leave:
8 1. Each incumbent of a line -item position shall accrue sick leave with pay
9
at the rate of twelve (12) days or the shift equivalent per year of
10
continuous service since the benefit date.
11 '
12 2. Sick leave may be used after the completion of the month of service in
13 which it was earned.
14 3. Sick leave shall begin with the first day of illness,
15 4. Department heads shall be responsible to the City Administrative
16
Officer for the uses of' sick. leave in their departments.
17
5. A department head shall require written proof of illness from an
18
19 authorized medical authority atthe employee's expense for sick leave
20 use in excess of five (5) consecutive working days by personnel in
21 his /her department. Such proof may be required for periods less than
22 five (5) consecutive working days where there exists an indication of
23
abuse.
24
25 6. Any employee who is absent because of sickness or other physical
26 disability shall notify his /her immediate supervisor or department head
27 as soon as possible but in any event during the first day of absence.
28 31
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Any employee who fails to comply with this provision without having
a valid reason will be placed on leave of absence without pay during
the unexcused absence and be subject to disciplinary action.
7. Any employee absent for an extended illness or other physical disability
may be required by the Personnel Director to have an examination by
the City's medical examiner at City expense prior to reinstatement to
the City service.
8. An appointing authority, subject to approval of the Personnel Director,
may require any employee to be medically examined where reasonable
cause exists to believe that an employee has a medical condition which
impairs his /her job effectiveness or may endanger the health, safety or
welfare of the employee, other employees, or the public. Employees
who are judged to be physically incapable of meeting normal
requirements of their positions may be placed in a classification of work
for which they are suitable when a vacancy exists, or may be separated
for physical disability.
9. In the event that an employee's sick leave benefits become exhausted
due to illness or exposure to contagious disease, the employee shall
revert to a status of leave of absence without pay and be subject to the
provisions of the Personnel Rules unless eligible to participate in the
City's Catastrophic Leave Policy. For continuation of medical insurance
see Insurance and Refund, Article 17, Section E.
10. The right to benefits under the sick leave plan shall continue only during
32
1 the period that the employee is employed by the City. This plan shall
2
not give any employee the right to be retained in the services of the
3
4 City, or any right of'claim to sickness disability benefits after separation
5 from the services of. the City. When an employee receives
6 compensation under the Worker's Compensation Act of California, such
7 compensation received shall be considered part of the salary to be paid
8 to the employee eligible for such payments as required by state law.
9
The amount paid by the City shall be the difference between the
10
11 amount received by the employee from the
12 City's compensation insurance coverage and the eligible employee's
13 regular rate of pay.
14 11. Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no employee shall
15 be entitled to receive any payment or other compensation from the City
16
while absent from duty by reason of injuries or disability received as a
17
18 result of engaging in employment other than employment by the City
19 for monetary gain or other compensation other than business or activity
20 connected with his /her City employment.
21 12. Accumulation of sick leave days shall be unlimited.
22 13. Upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage
23
of the dollar value of the employee's accumulated sick leave will be
24
25 paid to the employee, or the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries
26 according to the following scheduler
27 (a) Death - 25%
28
33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M
10
(b) Retirement and actual commencement of PERS benefits:
(1) After ten years of continuous employment - 10%
(2) After twenty years of continuous employment - 15%
34
1 ARTICLE 22
2
BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
3
4 At each employee's option, sick leave may be used to be absent from duty due to
5 the death of a member of the employee's immediate family, meaning spouse, child,
6 brother, sister, parent, parent -in -law, step parent, step- brother, step- sister,
7 grandparent, or any other relative living in the same household, provided such leave
8 as defined in this section shall not exceed five (5) working days (40 hours) for each
9
incident. The employee may be required to submit proof of relative's death before
10
being granted sick leave pay. False information concerning the death or relationship
11
12 shall be cause for discharge.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 35
1
ARTICLE 23
2
FAMILY LEAVE
- 3
A.
An employee may take up to two (2) days 0 6 hours) of sick leave per year
4
5
if required to be away from the job to personally care for a member of his /her
6
immediate family.
7
B.
An employee may take up to five (5) days (40 hours) of sick leave per year if
8
the family member is part of the employee's household.
9
C.
An employee may take up to seven (7) days (56 hours) of sick leave per year
10
if the family member is part of the employee's household and is hospitalized.
11
12
13
The employee shall submit written verification of such hospitalization.
14
D.
For purposes of this article, immediate family is defined as spouse, child,
15
brother, sister, parent, parent -in -law, step - parent, step - brother, step- sister,
16
grandparent, or any other relative living in the same household.
17
E.
The amounts shown in A, B, and C above are annual maximums, not
18
19
maximums per qualifying family member.
20
F.
In addition to existing leave benefits, unit employees with one or more years
21
of continuous service are entitled to up to four (4) months of family leave
22
within any twenty -four (24) month period to care for newborn or newly
23
adopted children; or for a child, parent or spouse with a serious health
24
condition. This leave shall be limited to one (1) month when taken in
25
26
conduction with the existing four (4) month pregnancy - disability leave
27
provided by California law.
28
36
1 Conditions governing this leave include:
2
1. Medical verifications.
3 -.
4 2. Only one spouse shall be granted leave if both are employed by
5 the City.
6 3. Employees are required to use accrued vacation as a part of the
7 family leave period. Use of accrued sick leave is not required,
8 but may be used if applicable under current rules.
9
4. Time spent on family leave shall not constitute a break in service
10
11 for purposes of seniority or longevity.
12 5. This leave is being provided for under the California Family
13 Rights Act of 1991. Any required interpretations shall be based
14 on the Act.
15 G. Parties recognize that employees may be eligible for additional family leave
16
benefits as provided in the City's Catastrophic Leave Policy.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24.
25
26
27
28 37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 24
VACATION LEAVE
A. Each incumbent of a 40 hour a week line -item position shall accrue vacation
leave with pay at the rate of 12 days (96 hours) per year of continuous
service since the benefit date for the first five years, 15 days (120 hours) per
year upon completion of five years, 18 days (144 hours) per year upon
completion of ten years, and 20 days (160 hours) upon completion of twenty
years.
B. An incumbent is not eligible to use accrued vacation leave until it has been
accrued, and approved as provided below.
C. A regular employee who leaves the City service shall receive payment for any
unused vacation leave.
D. It is the employee's responsibility to request and use 'vacation leave .in a
manner that neither jeopardizes their vacation balance nor the efficiency of the
work unit. Vacation schedules must be reviewed by management prior to the
scheduled vacation. Vacation schedules will be based upon the needs of the
City and then, insofar as possible, upon the wishes of the employee.
Management may not deny an employee's vacation request if such denial will
result in the loss of vacation accrual by the employee, except that,
management may approve a two -month extension of maximum vacation
accrual. In no event shall more than one such extension be granted in any
calendar year.
E. Any employee who is on approved vacation leave and becomes eligible for
38
n
1 sick leave, as defined in Section 2.36.420 of the Municipal Code, may have
2
such time credited as sick leave under the following conditions:
3
4 1. A physician's statement certifying that illness, injury or exposure
5 to contagious disease has occurred is presented to the supervisor
6 upon returning to work.
7 2. The vacation leave immediately ends and the employee reports
8 to work following the end of sick leave usage.. (Ordinance No.
9
782 - 1978 Series)
10
F. Vacation leave shall be accrued as earned through December 31, up to a
11
12 maximum of twice the annual rate.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 39
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE_ 25
UNPLANNED VACATION
In the case of unforeseen circumstances, an employee may use up to two (2) days
vacation annually as personal leave days. It is preferred but not required that a
personal leave day be scheduled in advance. If a day is taken which has not been
scheduled in advance, the employee must notify his /her supervisor directly, within
the first half hour of the work shift. If in the sole judgement of management, the
employee's absence would cause a severe disruption of City business, management
may require the employee to report to work. In such case, the time lost by the late
arrival will be charged against the employee's accumulated vacation or
compensatory time off balance. An employee may not use more than two
unplanned vacation days per calendar year. This benefit shall only be in effect
during the term of this agreement and shall terminate effective June 30 of the last
year of the term of this agreement.
.o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
ARTICLE 26
WORKERS' COMPENSATION LEAVE
Any employee who is absent from duty because of on- the -job injury in accordance
with state workers' compensation law and is not eligible for disability payments
under labor code section 4850 shall be paid the difference between his base salary
and the amount provided by workers' compensation law during the first 90
business days of such temporary disability absence. Eligibility for workers'
compensation leave requires an open workers' compensation claim. For
continuation of medical insurance see Insurance and Refund, Article 17, Section F.
41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 27
WORK SCHEDULE
This article is intended to define the normal hours of work and shall not be
construed as a guarantee of hours of work per day or hours of work per week, or
of days of work per week.
Employees shall be scheduled to work on regular workshifts having regular starting
and quitting times. Except for emergencies, employees' workshifts shall not be
changed without reasonable prior written notice to the employee and the Personnel
Director. Neither callback nor overtime constitute a change in workshift. All
references to accrual of vacation, holiday or sick leave in the Agreement shall be
interpreted as one (1) day being equivalent to eight (8) hours
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1.4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 28
VACATION SELL BACK _.
All employees in this unit are eligible, once annually in December, to request
payment for up to twenty four (24) hours of unused vacation leave provided that
an employee's overall performance and attendance practices are satisfactory.
Employees must have eighty (80) hours of accrued vacation leave to be eligible.
Payment for unused vacation leave is subject to the availability of budgeted funds.
43
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
14
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
261
27
28
ARTICLE 29
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City and Association acknowledge the passage of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. It is agreed that the City shall take all necessary actions to comply
with the provisions of this Act. If necessary, sections of this Memorandum of
Agreement and /or the City Personnel Rules may be suspended in order to achieve
compliance.
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1.4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 30
TRANSFER -
A. TRANSFER REQUEST
Employees who want to transfer may notify the City by filing a form with the
Personnel Department. Such form shall be developed and made available by
the Personnel Department.
B. TRANSFER PROCESS
Upon proper notice and concurrence by the City Administrative Officer, an
employee may be transferred by the appointing authority from one position to
another in the same pay range provided he /she possesses the minimum
qualifications as determined by the Personnel Director.
If the transfer involves a change from one department to another, both department
heads must consent thereto unless the City Administrative Officer orders the
transfer for purposes of economy and efficiency.
The employee shall be given five (5) business days' written notice of the transfer
including the reason for the change.
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20.
21
22'
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 31
LAYOFFS
LAYOFF .PROCEDURE
In accordance with Personnel Rule 2.36.280, the City Council of San Luis Obispo
shall determine when and in what position classifications layoffs are to occur. The
Personnel Director shall be responsible for the implementation of a layoff order of
the City Council in accordance with the procedures outlined below:
A. After determining which job classification within a department shall be
laid off, the order of layoffs shall be as follows:
1. Temporary and contract employees, in the order to be determined
by the appointing authority;
2. Probationary employees (promotional probation excluded), in the
order to be determined by the appointing authority;
3. Regular employees in the order determined by the following
excerpt from the Personnel Rules and Regulations, 2.36.280 "B ":
a. "For regular employees, layoffs shall be governed by job
performance and seniority in service within a particular
department and job classification; that is, a regular employee
being laid off shall be that employee with the least seniority
in the particular job classification concerned and in the
department involved who is in the lowest job performance
category based on the overall performance rating on the last
evaluation form due prior to the effective date of the
W.
1 layoff (s).. In other words, the regular employee in the lowest
2
job performance category having the least seniority within the
3
4 job classification to be deleted from a department will be the
5 first to be laid off.
6 b. In the event two or more employees in the same job
7 classification are in the same job performance category, the
8 employee with the least amount of service with the City shall
9
be laid off first.
10
c. Transfer to another department in lieu of layoff is authorized
11
12 upon approval of the department needs, if there is a vacancy
13 and the employee meets the minimum job requirements.
14 d. Regular part time employees shall receive prorated seniority
15 credit.
16
B. Laid Off Employees on Reemployment List.
17
18 The names of employees who have been laid off shall be placed
19 on the appropriate Reemployment List for one year. The recall of
20 employees will be in reverse order of layoff, depending upon City
21 requirements.
22
23
Reemployment lists shall be used for filling those classes
24
25 requiring substantially the same minimum qualifications, duties
26 and responsibilities of the class from which the layoff was made.
27 C. Appointment of Laid -Off Employees to Vacant Class.
28
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
An appointing authority may, with the approval of the
department head and the Personnel Director and in agreement-
with the employee, appoint an employee who is to be laid off to
a vacancy in a vacant class for which he or she is qualified.
D. Employee reassignments (bumping procedure) for SLOCEA only:
1. Employees who have been promoted during their service
with the City may bump back one classification in their
career series to a position they formerly held, if there is
an employee in the lower classification with less
seniority than the employee who wants to bump.
Seniority for the purpose of this section shall mean time
in the lower classification plus time in directly related
higher classifications. For example, an employee
attempting to bump to Accounting Assistant II from
Accounting Assistant III would utilize their combined
time as a II and III in determining whether or not they
had more seniority than an individual in the II
classification.
2. Reassignment rights may be exercised only once in
connection with any one layoff, and shall be exercised
within seven (7) calendar days from the date of .the notice
of the layoff, by written notice from the employee.
3. The bumping right shall be considered exercised by the
48
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
displacement of another employee with lesser total service
or by the acceptance of a vacant position in the class with
the same or lower salary.
4. Full time and part time regular employees shall have
bumping rights for either full time regular or part time regular
positions.
5. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the City Administrative
Officer determines that the public interest will not be served
by application of the above criteria, the City Administrative
Officer may depart therefrom on the basis of a clearly
demonstrable superiority in performance and /or
qualifications.
6. Employees on layoff shall be offered reemployment in the
inverse order of layoff, provided no intervening factors have
occurred which essentially change the ability of the
employee to perform the offered employment.
E. Employment programs with special requirements will be administered
in accordance with appropriate Federal or State guidelines and
directives.
F. The City will notify recognized employee organizations of the effective
date of any reduction in force concurrent with the notice to the
affected employee(s) pursuant to G, below.
G. Notice of Layoff to Employees.
ER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C
An employee to be laid -off shall be notified in writing of the impending
action at least thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the effective date
of the lay -off. The notice shall include the following information:
1. Reason for lay -off.
2. Effective date of layoff.
3. Employee rights as provided in these rules.
H. Removal of Names From Reemployment Lists.
The Personnel Director may remove an employee's name from a
reinstatement list if any of the following occur:
1. the individual indicates that he /she will be unable to return
to employment with the City during the life of the list; or
2. the individual cannot be reached after reasonable efforts
have been made to do so. The City shall utilize certified mail
when contacting individuals; or
3. the individual refuses two reemployment offers. Individuals
shall have ten (10) days to respond to the offer of
reemployment and an additional fourteen (14) days to return
to work.
K.. Employee Rights And Responsibilities.
In addition to others identified herein, employees affected by these
procedures shall have the following rights:
1. Through prior arrangement with his /her immediate supervisor
50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
n
n
an employee who has been notified of his /her impending
layoff shall be granted reasonable time off without loss of
pay to participate in a prescheduled interview or test for
other employment.
2. An employee who has been laid off shall be paid in full for
his /her unused accrued vacation leave on the effective date
of the layoff.
3. When an individual is reemployed he/she shall be entitled to:
a. Retain his /her seniority date.
b. Accrue vacation leave at the same rate at which it
was accrued at the time of the layoff.
C. Have any unused sick leave reinstated.
An individual reemployed into the job classification from which he /she
was laid off shall be assigned to the same salary range and step he /she
held at the time of the layoff. An individual reemployed into a job
classification other than the classification from which he /she was laid
off shall be assigned to the salary range of the new classification at the
amount closest to the salary he /she earned at the time of the layoff.
An individual reemployed into the classification from which he /she was
laid off while still a probationary employee shall complete, upon return
to the job, the remaining portion of his /her probationary period, if any,
in effect at the time of the layoff. Similarly, an individual who is
51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
reemployed shall complete upon . return to the job the same work time
he /she would have had to work at the time of the layoff to attain a
higher vacation leave accrual rate or to become eligible for a salary step
increase, if such changes are possible.
52
1
21
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 32
LIGHT DUTY ASSIGNMENT
If an employee's medical condition temporarily precludes the performance of his /her
normal duties and management determines modified work is available and
necessary to be performed, he or she may, with medical authorization, be
temporarily assigned to such work for a period not to exceed six months. No
change in base pay will result unless the duties to be performed are substantially
greater or lesser than those normally performed by the employee and the
employee's current. pay rate is not within the pay range for the temporarily assigned
work. In no event shall and employee's current pay rate be reduced more than four
(4) ranges at the same step.
53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23'
24
25
26
27
28
i�
ARTICLE 33
CLASS "1" PHYSICALS
The city will pay for costs for physical exams not covered by city insurance policies
required for those employees required by the City.to hold valid Class "1" California
drivers licenses.
M
1 ARTICLE 34
2 EMPLOYEE LOUNGE
3 City shall maintain an employee lounge in space located at the rear of the City
4
Council Chamber.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
55
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
261'
27
28
N
ARTICLE 35
UNIFORM AND UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
A. The secretaries and clerk typists in the Police Department shall receive a one
hundred and twenty -five dollar (5125.00) uniform allowance quarterly.
B. This allowance shall not be paid for any employee who is off duty for more
than three pay periods. If the employee returns to work during that quarter,
his /her uniform allowance will be prorated.
C. All other employees required to wear City uniforms shall be provided clean
uniforms. A uniform includes either one shirt and pants combination or one
pair of coveralls.
D. Uniforms and work shoes shall only be used on City business
E. Employees required to wear City uniforms shall only be permitted to wear
other clothing for medical reasons upon submission of a letter from the city
doctor certifying that the city uniform is injurious to their health. Decisions
regarding this paragraph shall be made by the Personnel Director on a
case -by -case basis.
56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 36
SAFETY PROGRAM
The City shall continue a compensation program for safety representatives on the
basis that each designated safety member shall be compensated at the rate of
$10.00 per month. The description of the duties of a safety committee member
shall be designed by the Personnel Director or his /her designee. The intent of the
safety representatives is to assist. the Personnel Director and the overall safety
program in reducing accidents by reporting hazardous conditions.
57
C -O
1 ARTICLE 37
2 REQUIRED FOOTWEAR
3 Employees required by management to wear protective footwear for safety reasons
4
shall be reimbursed up to one hundred (5100.00) dollars per year for the purchase.
5
6 of such footwear.
7
8 The issue of safety footwear shall be referred to the Safety Committee for review
9 as to alternate programs.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
58
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c
ARTICLE 38
EMPLOYEE-RIGHTS
Employees of the City shall have the right to form, join and participate in the
activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of
representation on all matters of employer - employee relations including but not
limited to, wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment.
Employees of the City also shalt have the right to refuse to join or participate in the
activities of employee organizations and shall' have the right to represent
themselves individually in their employment relations with the City. No employee
shall be interfered with, intimidated, restrained,. coerced or discriminated against
because of the exercise of these rights.
59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
•
ARTICLE 39
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
A grievance is defined as an alleged violation, misinterpretation or misapplication
of the personnel rules and regulations or of any Memorandum of Agreement,
excluding disciplinary matters, or other matters as fall within the scope of
representation.
Each grievance shall be handled in the following manner:
A. The employee who is dissatisfied with the response of the immediate
supervisor shall discuss the grievance with the supervisor's immediate
superior. The employee shall have the right to choose a representative
to accompany him /her at each step of the process. If the matter can
be resolved at that level to the satisfaction of the employee, the
grievance shall be considered terminated.
B. If still dissatisfied, the employee may submit the grievance in writing to
the department head for consideration, stating the facts on which it
was based, including the provision of the rules, regulations, or
agreement said to be violated, and the proposed remedy. This action
must take place within fifteen (15) business days of the response of
the supervisor's immediate superior but in no event later than thirty
(30) calendar days after the occurrence of the event giving rise to the
grievance. The department head shall promptly consider the grievance
.�
1 and render a decision in writing within fifteen (15) business days of
2 receiving the written grievance. If the employee accepts the
3 department head's decision, the grievance shall be considered
4
terminated.
5
6 C. If the employee is dissatisfied with the department head's decision, the
7 employee may immediately submit the grievance in writing to the
8 Personnel Director within seven (7) business days of receiving the
9 department heads's decision. The Personnel Director shall confer with
10 the employee and the department head and any other interested
11
parties, and shall conduct such other investigations as may be
12
13 advisable.
14 D. The results of findings of such conferences and investigations shall be
15 submitted to the City Administrative Officer in writing within fifteen
16 (15) business days of receiving the employee's written request. The
17 City Administrative Officer will meet with the employee if the employee
18
so desires before rendering a decision with respect to the complaint.
19
20 The City Administrative Officer's decision and reason if denied shall be
21 in writing and given the employee within twenty (20) business days of
22 receiving the Personnel Director's results and findings. Such decision
23 shall be final unless employee desires the Personnel Board to review the
24 decision. If such is the case, the e_ mployee will have ten (10) business
25
days following receipt of the City Administrative Officer's decision to
26
27
61
28
1
submit a written request to the Personnel Board through the Personnel
2
Director for a review of the decision. The Personnel Board within thirty
3
-
(30) business days. shall review the record and either (1) issue an
4
advisory opinion to the City Administrative Officer; or (2) conduct a
5
hearing on the matter. If a hearing is held, an advisory opinion shall be
6
7
rendered by the Board within ten (10) business days of the close of
8
such hearing. If an opinion signed by at least three (3) members of the
9
Personnel Board recommends overruling or modifying the City
10
Administrative Officer's decision, the City Administrative Officer shall
11
comply or appeal this recommendation to the City Council. Such
12
appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within three (3) business days
13
14
of the Board's action. If appealed, the City Council shall review the
15
case on the record and render a final decision within thirty (30)
16
business days of submittal.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
62
28
r i
1 ARTICLE 40
2 REPRESENTATIVE ROLE
3 Members of any recognized employee organization may, by a reasonable method,
4
select not more than three employee members of such organization, one employee
5
6 observer, and the Association President to meet and confer with the Municipal
7 Employee Relations Officer and other management officials (after written
8 certification of such selection is provided by an authorized official of the
9 organization) on subjects within the scope of representation during regular duty or
10 work hours without loss of compensation or other benefits.
11
12
The employee organization shall, whenever practicable, submit the name(s) of each
13
14 employee representative to the Municipal Employee Relations Officer at least two
15 working days in advance of such meeting. Provided further:
16 (1) That no employee representative shall leave his or her duty or work
17 station or assignment without specific approval of the department head
18
or other authorized City management official. If employee
19
20 representatives cannot be released, date of meeting will be rescheduled
21 in accordance with item (2) below.
22 (2) That any such meeting is subject to scheduling by City management
23 consistent with operating needs and work schedules. Nothing provided
24 herein, however, shall limit or restrict City management from scheduling
25
such meetings before or after regular duty or work hours.
26
27
63
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 41
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATION
A. If the Director of Personnel establishes a committee to study possible changes
which will affect significant numbers of employees in the unit in subjects
within the scope of representation, and if the Personnel Director includes unit
members on the committee, such committee members shall be designated by
the Personnel Director after consultation with the Association.
This unit shall have the same number of committee members as each other
unit has.
B. Two representatives of the bargaining unit designated by the Association and
two representatives of management designated by the City shall meet on a
quarterly basis to discuss issues of concern to the parties. The first such
meeting shall be in April of 1988.
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 42
DUES DEDUCTION
The City shall deduct dues from City employees and remit said dues to the
Association on a bi- weekly basis for the duration of this Agreement, which dues
shall not include assessments. Bi- weekly dues deduction additions and /or deletions
shall be recorded by the City's Finance Officer and a notification of all dues
transactions shall be sent bi- weekly to the Association Treasurer.
The Association shall hold the City harmless from any and all claims, and will
indemnify it against, any unusual costs in implementing these provisions. The
Association shall refund to the City any amount paid to it in error upon presentation
of supporting evidence.
65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 43
COPIES OF AGREEMENT
Parties agree City shall provide thirty (30) copies of the Agreement to the
Association. Association shall pay 1/2 City's actual cost. Parties shall consult
concerning size and format of printed agreement and concerning who does the
printing of the agreement.
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
.11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 44
MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
The rights of the City include, but are not limited to, the exclusive right to
determine the mission of its constituent departments, commissions and boards; set
standards of service; determine the procedures and standards of selection for
employment and promotion, direct its employees; take disciplinary action; relieve
its employees from duty because of lack of Work or for other legitimate reasons;
maintain the efficiency of governmental operations; determine the methods, means
and personnel by which government operations are to be conducted; determine the
content of job classifications; take all necessary actions to carry out its mission in
emergencies; and exercise complete control and discretion over its organization and
the technology of performing its work.
67
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EN
0
ARTICLE 45
PEACEFUL PERFORMANCE
If an employee participates in a strike or a concerted work stoppage, the City may
apply discipline up to and including discharge. However, nothing herein shall be so
construed as to affect the right of any employee to abandon or to resign his
employment..
A. Employee organizations shall not hinder, delay, or interfere, coerce
employees of the City to hinder, delay; or interfere with the peaceful
performance
of City
services by
strike, concerted work
stoppage,
cessation of
work,
slow =down,
sit -down, stay -away, or
unlawful
picketing.
B. In the event that there occurs any strike, concerted work stoppage, or
any other form of interference with or limitation of the peaceful
performance of City services prohibited by this article, the City, in
addition to any other lawful remedies of disciplinary actions, may by
action of the Municipal Employee Relations Officer cancel any or all
payroll deductions, prohibit the use of bulletin boards, prohibit the use
of City facilities, and withdraw recognition of the employee organization
or organizations participating in such actions.
C. Employees shall not be locked out or prevented by management
officials from performing their assigned duties when such.employees
are willing and able to perform such duties in the customary manner
UM
1 and at a reasonable level of efficiency, provided there is work to
2 perform.
3 Any decision made under the provisions of the Article may be appealed to the City
4
Council by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the City Clerk,
5
accompanied by a complete statement setting forth all of the facts upon which the
6
7 appeal is based. Such Notice of Appeal must be filed within ten (10) working days
8 after the affected employee organization first received notice of the decision upon
9 which the complaint is based, or it will be considered closed and not subject to any
10 other appeal.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
69
28
1 ARTICLE 46
2 FULL AGREEMENT
3 It is understood this Agreement represents a complete and final understanding on
4
all negotiable issues between the City and the Association. The Agreement
5
6 supersedes all previous Memoranda of Understanding or Memoranda of Agreement
7 between the City and the Association except as specifically referred to in this
8 Agreement. The parties, for the term of this Agreement, voluntarily and
9 unqualifiedly agree to waive the obligation to negotiate with respect to any
10 practice, subject or matter not specifically referred to or covered in this Agreement
11
even though such practice, subject or matter may not have been Within the
12
13 knowledge of the parties at the time this Agreement was negotiated and signed.
14 In the event any new practice, subject or matter arises during the term of this
15 Agreement and an action is proposed by the City, the Association shall be afforded
16 notice and shall have the right to meet and confer upon request.
17
18
19
20
21
22.
23
24
25
26
27
70
28
t
1 ARTICLE 47
2 SAVINGS CLAUSE
3
If. any provision of this Agreement should be held invalid by operation of law or by
4
any court of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance with or enforcement of any
5
6 provision should be restrained by any tribunal, the remainder of this Agreement
7 shall not be affected thereby, and the parties shall enter into a meet and confer
8 session for the sole purpose of arriving at a mutually satisfactory replacement for
9 such provision within a thirty (30). day work period. If no agreement has been
10 reached, the parties agree to invoke the provision of impasse under Section 13 of
11
City Resolution No. 6620.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
71
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
�f
r
r&
ARTICLE 48
AUTHORIZED AGENTS
For the purpose of administering the terms and provisions of this Agreement:
A. The Association's principal authorized agent shall be the President
(address: 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California 93401: (805)
781 -7047) .
B. Management's principal authorized agent shall be the Personnel Director
or his /her duly authorized representative (address: P.O. Box 81.00, San
Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100; telephone: (805) 781 - 7252).
72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ARTICLE 4
SIGNATURES
Classifications covered by this Agreement and included within this unit are shown
in Appendix "A ".
This Agreement becomes effective August.18, 1992 as witnessed hereto by the
following parties:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
William Avery, City Consultant
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION
Paul Bechely, SLOCEA Consultant
(hurt ft pcley— * -� -
Ann McPike, Personnel Director Tim Girvin, President
Other City Negotiating Team members: Other SLOCEA Negotiating Team Members
Ken Hampian, Assistant CAD
Mike Bertaccini
Laurie Hanson
Kevin Niles
Diane Stuart
73
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPENDIX A
CLASSIFICATIONS
Clerical
• Office Assistant I
• Office Assistant II
Secretary I
Secretary II
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Secretary
Senior Administrative Secretary
Assistant City Clerk
Council Secretary
Accounting Assistant II
Accounting Assistant III
Computer Graphic Technician,
Computer Systems Technician
Technical Systems Coordinator
• Police Records Clerk
• Police Records Clerk II
Recreation Coordinator I
Recreation Coordinator II
Maintenance
• Janitor I
• Janitor II
Janitor III
Building Maintenance Technician
• Maintenance Worker I
• Maintenance Worker II - Buildings
• Maintenance Worker II = Parks
• Maintenance Worker II - Streets
Maintenance Worker III Parks
Maintenance Worker III - Streets
Parks Maintenance Technician
Street Painter
• Tree Trimmer I
74
S
It
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28',
Tree Trimmer II
Pool Technician
Heavy Equipment Operator I
Heavy Equipment Operator II
Heavy Equipment Mechanic
Parking Meter Repair Worker
Signal Maintenance Electrician
Miscellaneous
Fire Service Trainee
Hazard Materials Coordinator
Parking Enforcement Officer
Public Education Specialist
Work Health Coordinator.
Utilities
Telemetry & Instrumentation Technician
• Utility Worker II
Utility Worker III
Water Laboratory Technician
Water Reclamation Laboratory Technician
• Water Reclamation Facility Operator Trainee
• Water Reclamation Facility Operator I
• Water Reclamation Facility Operator II
• Water Services Worker II
Water Services Worker III
• Water Treatment Plant Operator I
• Water Treatment Plant Operator II
• Water Treatment Plant Operator 111
Wastewater Pretreatment Technician
• Water Supply Operator II
Water Supply Operator III
Planning /Engineering
Planning Technician
Administrative Assistant
• Assistant Planner
• Associate Planner
Building Permit Coordinator
Graphics Technician
75
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Engineering Technician
Engineering Assistant
Field Engineering Assistant
Civil Engineer
Building Inspector
Fire Inspector
Fire Plan Check Inspector
Projects Inspector
Public Works Inspector
Zoning Inspector
Dots (.) designate positions within a classification series.
76
I
RESOLUTION NO. 8051 (1.992 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING COMPENSATION
FOR THE CITY CLERK
WHEREAS, the City Council establishes the salary range for, among other positions, the City
Clerk in the Managerial Compensation Plan for Appointed Officials et.al. (Resolution No. 8015 -1992
Series); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 4516 (11981 Series), the City Council appointed Pam Voges as
City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated compensation factors for the City Clerk under
Section 2 of the Managerial Compensation Plan for Appointed Officials et.al. (Resolution No., 6604,-
1989 Series); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. r 6995 - 1991 Series, the City Council established compensation
for City Clerk Pam Voges.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of,San Luis Obispo as
follows:
SECTION 1. Effective April 9, 1992, the City Clerk's salary shall increase from $4,520 per
month to $4,640 per month.
SECTION 2. All other compensation and benefits afforded the City Clerk under the Appointed
Officials Compensation Plan (Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series), and the City.d.erk Employment
Agreement (Resolution No. 6172 - 1987 Series) not superseded by the—above;-"shall' remain' -'in full
force and effect with the following modifications: In the. event Ms. Voges' employment is terminated
by the Council, or a majority of the Council request her resignation during such time that she is
willing and able to perform the duties of City Clerk, the City agrees to pay her a lump sum cash
payment equal to six (6) months compensation (salary and all appointed officials' fringe benefits).
Should Ms. Voges obtain employment during the six (6) month period following termination, she shall
reimburse the City proportionately.
SECTION 3. The City Council shall evaluate the performance of the City Clerk annually.
On motion of Councilman Roalman seconded by Vice—Mayor Rappa
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES.: Councilmembers Roalman, Rippa, Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R-8051
v '-�)
Resolution No. 8051 0 992 Series)
Page 2
}
J
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of August 1992..
MAYOR RON DUNIN
ATTEST:
PA4 VOGES, CI CLERK
APPROVED:
C�ld'�SG4J 1C��4�
Finance D' ctor
e�V�
nel Director Director
RESOLUTION NO. 8050. (1992 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR CITY CLERK SERVICES
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND
PAM VOGES
BE IT RESOLVED by the San Luis Obispo City Council as follows:
SECTION 1. That certain agreement attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A," and
incorporated herein by reference, between the City of San Luis Obispo and Pam.Voges
is hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
Councilman
On motion of Roalman seconded by Vice -Mayor Rappa ,
and on the following roll call vote,:
AYES: Vice -Mayor Rappa, Councilmembers Pinard, Reiss, and Mayor Dunin
NOES: Councilman Roalman
ABSENT: None
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of_August, 1992.
ATTEST:
- Qw--4
City Clerk Pam ges
'00eOD ===�00
Mayor Ron. Dunin
R -8050
(A_Q7_Q1_rr)
i
U y
Resolution No. 8050 (1992 Series)
APPROVED:
City dministrative Officer
/r/Aft ne
/11�lt Finance irector
i✓
Personnel Director
k t A,
tjIZ 4{92
1)( (�
-_
� h
i
Exhibit A
A- 87 =92 -CC
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, is by and between T14E CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a
chartered municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Pam Voges, an
individual, to provide City Clerk related services (hereinafter referred to as "Employee ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Pam Voges is a qualified City Clerk capable of performing all functions
related to City Clerk duties including election and records management services; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to employ her to perform certain City Clerk services.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Employee for and in consideration of the mutual
benefits, agreements and promises set forth herein, agree as follows:
1. Beginning October 1. _1992, Employee agrees to provide services to the City
related to City Clerk operations, specifically including election and records management
functions. Said services shall continue through November 6. 1992, providing, however,
that Employee and City mutually agree that Employee shall not work in excess of 20
hours per week during the term of`this Agreement. The general duties to be performed
by said Employee shall be at the direction of the City Council.
A- 87 -92 -CC
(R -8050)
2. Notwithstanding any other representations, oral or written, between the
parties, including any and all agents or representatives thereof, Employee at all times
covered by the terms of this Agreement, is acting as an employee of the City and is
afforded all compensation and benefits under the Appointed Officials Compensation Plan
(Resolution No. 6604 - 1989 Series); and the City Clerk Employment Agreement
(Resolution No. 6172 - 1987 Series), except for reduction of hours worked, or as
otherwise superseded, by Paragraph 1 above, shall remain in full force and effect.
Any and all supervision and direction by the City Council shall be only that
necessary to provide broad general outlines, and Employee is to use her own initiative
and discretion in performing the details of her work provided that the Council may request
specific reports or direction.
3. City agrees to provide working space at the City and supplies necessary for
performance under this Agreement, subject to purchase authorization by the City.
4. Employee agrees that hours worked shall not exceed 20 hours per week
payable in accordance with regular City payroll procedures. Employee will accrue
vacation, sick leave, or other similar benefits available to regular City employees. '
5. Employee agrees to be readily available by telephone or other agreed upon
communications method during normal business hours other than hours actually worked.
6. Employee agrees to use her personal vehicle on City business at her
expense.
7. Employee acknowledges that her employement with the City of San Luis
Obispo shall terminate effective the end of the business day on November 6, 1992.
8. For purposes of notice under this Agreement, all notices shall be considered
effective upon being sent by certified U.S. Mail to the following address:
City: City Clerk
City of San Luis Obispo
P. O. Box 8100
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403
Employee: Pam Voges
1740 Portola Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93405
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to
be executed.
Kim Condon
Em o e
Pa Voges
City of San uis Obispo
ayor Ron Dunin
� r ti�� \Ay