HomeMy WebLinkAbout8125-8149RESOLUTION NO. 8149 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ACTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
COMMISSION TO APPROVE AN EXCEPTION TO SIGN REGULATIONS
FOR A MONUMENT SIGN AT 1335 BROAD STREET (ARC 21 -93)
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission conducted
a public hearing on a request to approve an exception to sign
regulations for a monument sign at 1335 Broad Street (ARC 21 -93)
on March 1, 1993, and determined to approve an exception to the
maximum height normally allowed; and
WHEREAS, the action of the Architectural Review
Commission has been appealed to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City council has conducted a public
hearing to consider the appeal on April 6, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the testimony
and statements of the appellant and applicant, and other
.interested parties, and the records of the Architectural Review
Commission hearing and action, and the evaluation and
recommendation of staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council resolves to deny the
appeal, and uphold the action of the Commission to approve a
four -foot high monument sign where a three -foot maximum height is
normally allowed, based on the following finding as adopted by
the Commission and subject to the limitation that the sign not be
internally illuminated and the requirement that any other
application for signs on this property require Architectural
Review Commission review:
SECTION 1. Finding.
1. There are, exceptional circumstances which apply to the site
R -8149
Resolution No. 8149 (1991 Series)
ARC 21 -93
Page 2 -
which justify an exception to the height regulations,
specifically the existence of a mature hedge on the property
and the existence of a taller monument sign on the adjacent
property.
On motion of Council Member Roalman
seconded by Council Member Rappa , and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa, and Romero
NOES: Council Member Settle and Mayor Pinard
i
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day
of April , 1993.
Mayor Peg Pdnard _
ATTEST:
t Clerk Diane R. G t well
APPROVED:
ty A inistrative Officer
C't tt ne
a nu
,
RESOLUTION NO. 8148 (1993r `...ries)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 012 TO THE LOCAL AGENCY
STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS
NO. 05 -5016 FOR THE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT -
ELKS LANE AT SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK
CITY PLAN NO. L -10H
WHEREAS, the City and the State have entered into Master Agreement No. 05 -5016
for Federal -Aid Projects; and
WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 012 to the Master Agreement designates the
Federal Funds requested and the matching funds to be provided by the City for right -of -way
acquisition for the Bridge Replacement Project, Elks Lane at San Luis Obispo Creek; and
WHEREAS, the City is eligible to receive. Federal Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Funds (HBRR) for this project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo, California hereby:
1. Approves Exhibit A attached, entitled "Program Supplement No. 012 to Local Agency
- State Agreement for Federal -Aid Projects No. 05- 5016," and the Mayor is authorized
to execute the same.
2. Directs the City Clerk to transmit the two (2) originals, attaching to each a copy of the
authorizing resolution to:
Mr. John W. Ritter
Asst. Dist. Local Streets & Roads Engineer
California Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 8114
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8114
Upon motion of Council Member Rapp a seconded by Council Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
R -8148
I
Resolution No.8148(1993 Series)
Page Two.
AYES: Council Member Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of April , 1993.
ATTEST:
��illillillill; NONNI 1111111111
APPROVED:
:l
jha/hbrr -non
by
F vex,
i
February 3, 1993
?4:OGRAM SUPPLEMENT Ne.: 012 Locat"ivn: 05- SLO -O -SLO
to I Project Number: BROS- 0079(017)
LOCAL AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT E.A. Number: 05- 140754
FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS NO. 05 -5016
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency -State
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency
and the State on 06/22/78 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. 8148 approved by the Local Agency on April 6, 1993
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI:
ON ELKS LANE AT SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK, BRIDGE NO. 49C -081.
TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE EXISTING BR. & CONST. APPR. RDWYLENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
,)%f jay] Preliminary Engineering J1 X Right -of -Way [ ]
[ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction
Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds
Local OTHER OTHER
$ 24000 117 $ 19200 $ 4800 $ 0 $ 0
$ 0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
I
By
Mayor eg Pinard
_Date 6t 0 73
Attest ,
C' -t leik Diane R. dwell
Title
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
DIST CT LOOCCAAL '
STREET AND ROADS ENGINEER
Date 41! 5L93
I hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
Accounting Officek /' 14VW
Date 9'3.5-3 $ 19200.00
Chapterl Statutes l Item I Y 1(eef- I Program 18C1 Fund Source I AMOUNT
587 1992 2660- 101 -890
92-93 20.30.010.300 C 224060 892 -F 19200.00
Page 1 of •-a
K
• \�
05- SLO -O -S LO
BROS- 0079(017)
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
DATE: 02/03/93
1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the improvements, referred to in Article UI
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be
performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required
for efficient operation of the completed improvements..
2. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this
project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to
either award or rejection of the contract.
3. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2) /Detail
Estimate; or its modification (PR -2A) or the FNM -76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of
Local Streets and Roads.
5.. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal -Aid Program.
6. Whenever- the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub - contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.:
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili=
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in
CFR 4.9, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 o ° _t',' 7
RESOLUTION NO. 8147(1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 011 TO THE
LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL -AID
PROJECTS NO. 05 -5016 FOR THE "BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT - NIPOMO STREET
AT SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK
CITY PLAN NO. J -12H"
WHEREAS, the City and the State have entered into Master Agreement No. 05 -5016
for Federal -Aid Projects; and
WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 011 to the Master Agreement designates the
Federal Funds requested and the matching funds to be provided by the City for right -of -way
acquisition for the Bridge Replacement Project - Nipomo Street at San Luis Obispo Creek,
City Plan No. J -12H; and
WHEREAS, the City is eligible to receive Federal Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Funds (HBRR) for this project;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San
Luis Obispo, California hereby:
1. Approved Exhibit A attached, entitled "Program Supplement No. 011 to Local Agency
State Agreement for Federal -Aid Projects No. 05- 5016, ". and the Mayor is authorized
to execute the same.
2. Directs the City Clerk to transmit the two (2) originals, attaching to each a copy of the
authorizing resolution to:
Mr. John W. Ritter
Asst. Dist. Local Streets & Roads Engineer
California Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 8114
San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8114
R -8147
Resolution No.8147(1993 Series)
Page Two.
Upon motion of Council Member Rappa seconded by Council Member Romero
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of April , 1993.
wel .0 Ea !L� �.•1
e yI
ATTEST:
4 !=�—WJORMW -1 MWAQ
n]9t"019:163
jh4 /hbrr -j12h
by
Al
oil
�V
C
N
`f n D"•e: December 9, 1992
- PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT L_t 011 Locat_4n: 05- SLO -O -SLO
to Project Number: BRM- Y398(002)
LOCAL AGENCY -STATE AGREEMENT E.A. Number: 05- 929591
FOR FEDERAL -AID PROJECTS NO. 05 -5016 CRP- L089(977)
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency -State
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency
and the.State on 06/22/78 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. 8147 , approved by the Local Agency on April 62 1993
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages..
PROJECT TERMINI:
ON NIPOMO ST AT SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK, BR. NO. 49C -369.
TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE BRIDGE AND APPROACHES LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
[ ] Preliminary Engineering [X] Right -of -Way [ ]
[ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction
Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds
Local OTHER OTHER
$ 15000 118 $ 12880 $ 2120 $ 0 $ 0
$ 0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By _
Mayo Peg Pinard
Date —�
Attest
Title
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of/ Transportation
By QJ./a��/f I.� (.J�!1
DISTRICT LOCAL
STREET AND ROADS ENGINEER
Dates Lq 3
I hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
Accounting Offi�%��N\ Date �� / �Z $ 12880.00
Chapter Statutes I Item l y Year (�_' Program 1BC1 Fund Source I AMOUNT
587 1992 2660- 101 -890
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
92 -93 20.30.010.300 C 224060 892 -F 12880.00
Page 1 of 2
05- SLO -O -SLO U
BRM- Y398(002)
nDATE: 12/09/92
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be
performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required
for efficient operation of the completed improvements.
2. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this
project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to
either award or rejection of the contract.
3. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2) /Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR -2A) or the FNM -76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of
Local Streets and Roads.
4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal -Aid Program.
5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub - contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili-
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in
CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 8146(1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ACCEPTING THE RIGHT -OF -WAY AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF
ACCEPTANCE FOR THE EASEMENT DEED FOR THE BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT - N1POM0 STREET AT
SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK
CITY PLAN NO. J -12H
WHEREAS, the City proposes to replace the Nipomo Street Bridge at San Luis Obispo
Creek; and
WHEREAS, replacing the Nipomo Street Bridge requires the acquisition of an easement
over the property commonly known as The Creamery; and
WHEREAS, the City has successfully negotiated a right -of -way agreement and easement
deed with the property owners;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California hereby accepts Exhibit B attached, entitled "Right -of -Way Agreement and
Certificate of Acceptance," and the Mayor is authorized to execute the same.
On motion of Council Member Rappa ,seconded by Council Member Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 6th day of April , 1993.
R -8146
`Resolution No.8146 (1993 Series)
Page Two.
ATTEST:
VA
APPROVED:
jh4 /row -jt2h
by
M
rl
0
�-,.IGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT
A- 32 -93 -CC
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between
The Creamery, a Limited Partnership
hereinafter called "Grantor ", and
The City of San Luis Obispo
hereinafter called "City"
An instrument in the form of an Easement Deed covering the property particularly
described therein, has been executed and delivered to City.
In consideration of which, and other considerations hereinafter set forth, it.is
mutually agreed as follows:
1. The parties have herein set forth the whole of their agreement. The performance
of this agreement constitutes the entire consideration for said document and shall relieve
the City of all further obligation or claims on this account, or on account of the location,
grade or construction of the proposed public improvement.
2. The City shall:
A. PAYMENT -Pay to the order of the Grantor the sum of $12,100 as
consideration in full for the herein real property for the loss, replacement and moving of,
any improvements, and for entering into this Agreement. Said sum shall be paid within (30)
days after title to said real property has vested in City free and clear of all liens,
encumbrances, assessments, easements and leases recorded or unrecorded, except for
recorded public utility easements and right of way.
B. RECORDATION OF INSTRUMENT - Accept the herein referenced
instrument and cause the same to be recorded in the office of the San Luis Obispo County
Recorder at such time as when clear title can be conveyed.
C. MISCELLANEOUS COSTS Fes..
transaction and, if title insurance is desired.
4/1/93
D. CLEARANCE OF BONDS. Ac
Have the authority to deduct and pay iron
amount necessary to satisfy any bond dem
the year in which this escrow closes, togeth
delinquent and unpaid nondelinquent asse
escrow.
E. CONSTRUCTION AND RES i
modifications to Grantor's remaining prof
A, attached hereto and incorporated herel.
Grantor's adjacent parking lot throughout
Bridge Replacement Project, for which the
modifications specifically shall include: .
i) widening the existing exit
and exit;
Barbara Vance needs the
original of the Right -of =Way
Agreement (A- 32- 93 -CC) for
the Nipomo Street Bridge on
the April 6, 1993 Council Mtg.
after it has been executed by
the Mayor_ & Clerk.
It's for escrow!
(Item #C -8 on 4/6/93)
JSB —
this
er.
ES
'mil`
mxcept
'or .
ose of
:hibit
to
xeet
id
ii) constructing a temporary internal connector to provide appropriate
traffic.circulation in accordance with existing parking stall layout; and
iii) barricading the existing entrance driveway during the construction period.
A- 32 -93 -CC
Said work shall be completed by City in advance of commencementof construction on the
Nipomo Street Bridge Replacement Project.
Upon completion of the Nipomo Street Bridge Replacement Project, City shall restore
Grantor's real property and other improvements located thereon to the condition that
existed prior to said construction, to the extent that is reasonably practical. Ingress and
egress to Grantor's property shall be maintained at all times. All construction and
restoration work shall be done by City at City's sole cost and expense. City shall provide
Grantor and tenants of Grantor 30 days advance written notice of the onset of construction
activities. Additionally, City shall provide public notice in advance of the onset of
construction. Said notice shall run no less than three times in the local newspaper, and shall
specifically inform the public that the Creamery parking lots will remain open throughout
the construction period. City shall make all reasonable and diligent efforts to promote the
completion of project construction within seven months from commencement of
construction activities.
F. PARKING - During the referenced Nipomo Street Bridge construction period,
authorize and provide at least three parallel street parking spaces on Nipomo Street in the
general locations depicted in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein. These
spaces should have identified time limitations so as to encourage turnover.
G. SIGNAGE - Includ
Replacement Project construct
the corner of Higuara and Nip
Nipomo Street bridge, indicati
guiding drivers to Grantor's p<
as standard "detour" signs utiL
accordance with standard sign
Bridge Replacement Project.
appropriate provisions in the Nipomo Street Bridge
ion contract to require selected contractor to provide signs at
Imo Street and at the temporary barricade south of the
ig "Creamery Parking. Lot Open ", with directional arrows
rking lot. Said signs shall be of the same quality and format
zed throughout the construction area, prepared in
post detail referenced in City plans for the Nipomo Street
H. COORDINATION WITH BUSINESS TENANTS_ - Take practical and
reasonable steps to mitigate impacts of construction activities on Grantor's tenants. City
hereby acknowledges the value of coordinating with the downtown business association to
discuss and coordinate potential mitigations.
I. INDEMNIFICATION - Defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Grantor from
any and all claims, damages, costs, judgments, or liability caused by City or its officers,
employees or agents specifically arising from the construction of the Nipomo Street Bridge
Replacement Project and City construction and restoration work on Grantors real
property related thereto.
3. The Grantor:
A. PAYMENT ON MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST - Agrees that any or-all
monies payable under this Agreement up to and including the total, amount of the unpaid
principal and interest on the note(s) secured by mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust, if any, and
all other amounts due and payable in accordance with the terms and conditions of said
mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust, shall upon demand(s) be made payable to the mortgagee(s)
or beneficiary(s) entitled thereunder; said mortgagee(s) or beneficiary(s) to furnish Grantor
with a good and sufficient receipt showing said-monies credited against the indebtedness
secured by said mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust.
B. LEASE INDEMNIFICATION - Warrants there are no oral or written leases on
all or any portion of the herein referenced real property exceeding a period of one month,
or if there are such leases, Grantor agrees to hold the City harmless and reimburse City for
any and all of its losses and expenses occasioned by reason of any lease of said property
held by tenant of Grantor fora period exceeding one month.
C. POSSESSION - Shall retain possession of the property conveyed up to and
including the date of recording of the deed conveying title to City.
4. The Parties agree:
EM
A. ESCROW - To open an escrow in accordance with this Agreement at Ticor Title
Company, San Luis Obispo. This Agreement constitutes the joint escrow instructions of
City and Grantor, and Escrow Agent to whom these instructions are delivered is hereby
empowered to act under this Agreement. The parties hereto agree to do all acts necessary
to close this escrow in the shortest possible time.
As soon as possible after opening of escrow, City will deposit the executed Deed by
Grantor, with Certificate of Acceptance attached, with Escrow Agent on Grantor's behalf.
City agrees to deposit the purchase price upon demand of Escrow Agent. City and Grantor
agree to deposit with Escrow Agent all additional instruments as may be necessary to
complete this transaction. All funds received in this escrow shall be deposited with other
escrow funds in a general escrow fund account(s) and may be transferred to any other such
escrow trust account in any State or National Bank doing.business in the State of
California. All disbursements shall be made by check from such account.
Any taxes which have been paid by Grantor, prior to opening of this escrow, shall
not be pro -rated between City and Grantor, but Grantor shall have the sole right after close
of escrow, to apply to the County Tax Collector of said County for any refund of such
taxes which may be due owner for the period after City's acquisition.
i) ESCROW AGENT DIRECTIVES - Escrow Agent is authorized to, and
shall:
a) Pay and charge Grantor for any unpaid delinquent taxes and/or any
penalties and interest thereon, and for any delinquent assessments or
bonds against that portion of Grantor's property subject to this
transaction as required to convey clear title.
b) Pay and charge City for any escrow fees, charges and costs payable under
Paragraph 2.C. of this Agreement;
c) Disburse funds and deliver deed when conditions of this escrow have been
fulfilled by City and Grantor.
d) Following recording of Deed from Grantor, respond to any City request
to provide City with a CLTA Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance
in the amount of $12,100 issued by Ticor Title Company showing that
title to the herein real property is vested in City, subject only to the
following exceptions, and the printed exceptions and stipulations in said
polices:
1) Real Property Taxes for the fiscal year in which escrow closes.
2) Items numbered 3,4, 5, 6, and 7 of title report # 210372 dated
September 1, 1992 at 7:30 issued by Ticor Title Company.
CLOSE OF ESCROW - The term "close of escrow ", if and where written in
these instructions, shall mean the date necessary instruments of conveyance
are recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Recordation of
C t�
instruments delivered through this escrow is hereby authorized.
B. JUDGMENT IN LIEU OF DEED - In the event Grantor is unable to deliver
title in a reasonable time under the terms of the Agreement, the City may file an action in
eminent domain to pursue the acquisition of this parcel, and this Agreement shall constitute
a stipulation which may be filed in said proceedings as fmal and conclusive evidence of the
total amount of damages for the taking, including all of the items listed in Section 1260.230
of the Code of Civil Procedure, regarding this parcel.
C. ARTICLE HEADINGS - Article headings in this Agreement are for
convenience only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms,
covenants and conditions of this Agreement.
D. SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL.. This Agreement represents Grantor's settlement
proposal and is expressly subject to and contingent upon City's acceptance and approval.
Deposit into escrow of a fully executed copy of this Agreement constitutes acceptance and
approval by City.
E. COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING - This Agreement constitutes the entire
understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, superseding all
negotiations, prior discussions, and preliminary agreements or understandings, written or
oral. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing by the parties hereto or their
successors or assigns.
Dated: C3
GRANTOR: The
by:
CITY: The City of San Luis Obispo
bya
C'iy Clerk iane Gladweli Mayor eg Pinard
No Obligation Other Than Those Set Forth Herein Will Be Recognized.
iig a are
io'e "4'
J
1 /
Ckl6R' M.(IV7f,VA,YCE
e*4.r 4OZ AW W.6
i C —rmML1
its sus a m
litIra I
� 679 9iJS hiT
0
N S3407'00'L WxV
J&40, _ 54. 00
P ' &7 .A s_
s; rn -ILO ,tEr .Y
Az" low M
4*%wT (.f, -al
N 8fi'53'GD'W
ao- cuo ! 7.*c
AIR i
n
ao o..ew
EASEMENT
h
I�
f✓ss
4�/R/77==
a`
Jra cel C.
�
CO 6 /f/. ?!
A!
.A.
'J / >?.Gt7
g
.v aaa,C .crrsa
V /C //V /TY /tI.4P
SEf Q'T, Q'.
uct
r�q ys�
,
? 9 2 OR /4t5
N• a
1�pD°�
N °; • 4! a
_.yep v e�
iig a are
io'e "4'
J
1 /
Ckl6R' M.(IV7f,VA,YCE
e*4.r 4OZ AW W.6
i C —rmML1
its sus a m
litIra I
� 679 9iJS hiT
0
N S3407'00'L WxV
J&40, _ 54. 00
P ' &7 .A s_
s; rn -ILO ,tEr .Y
Az" low M
4*%wT (.f, -al
N 8fi'53'GD'W
ao- cuo ! 7.*c
AIR i
a0'
8
�a
8
0
h
8
r,
E
3
h
�t
Zti
I�
IA
h
I�
f✓ss
4�/R/77==
Jra cel C.
�
CO 6 /f/. ?!
A!
L6�
'J / >?.Gt7
g
.v aaa,C .crrsa
SEf Q'T, Q'.
r�q ys�
3
? 9 2 OR /4t5
J
t
$
r—&AWM9wrAW a7
sff4"O!Mr. w
co A. d c
-
1512.09 Ae i q,/ 3
OM94VAC NWIY__
C::WA0.-X GK
A114W fA /N/fl
A4515 Ow 4eAQ/NSS
N 53'07'QO'E
a0'
8
�a
8
0
h
8
r,
E
3
h
�t
Zti
I�
IA
/G l/ER A S/ R'XMO e.USS IPAI -
h
I�
8
�
J
t
/G l/ER A S/ R'XMO e.USS IPAI -
ILI
Ali
WIDEN EXIST.
DRIVEWAY
Sol
*t
BARRICADE EXIST.
DRIVEWAY
I ����iuil�����`���� city or
san lugs OBISPO
F. 11 N I IL.711T 71,77
45
Ali
WIDEN EXIST.
DRIVEWAY
Sol
*t
BARRICADE EXIST.
DRIVEWAY
I ����iuil�����`���� city or
san lugs OBISPO
F. 11 N I IL.711T 71,77
I
1'
V
R! Zia- • f _ ' F I ♦ �. :,,
♦ � /l1
'' • ru g'
Ar
Y A
}••
Ai
• y1 M.
&a-al flu
•�`�.'yi}Tr,�+ �llr'�^! � -T, i _l -iY `t � , �j � . Ma ' �� G� �� { f+
c C}
• I a�
h t
1
Ir
v ■.I
is
-_': �.., S`. � • 1, �¢. -' i f `"b „ '� 1 r 4 R + '
3
C 77
+' w' is • .'t
1�
, 1
e:lr At' F"
]recording requested by and when
recorded, please return to: 0
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
P.O. BOX 8100
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403 -8100 No fee per Government Code 6103
No Documentary Transfer Tax per Revenue Taxation Code 11922
APN: 02- 402 -046
EASEMENT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
THE CREAMERY, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
hereby GRANTS to the City of San Luis Obispo, a chartered municipal corporation, an easement to
maintain, repair and improve the Nipomo Street bridge wing wall and creek channel over the following
described property:
That portion of Block 6I of the City of San Luis Obispo as conveyed by deed
recorded June 27, 1983 In Vol 2497 at Page 519 in the Office of the San Luis Obispo
County Recorder, In the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luls Obispo, State
of California, as per map filed in Book A, Page I68 of Nlaps, .In the office of the
County Recorder of said County, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the westerly line of Nipomo Street in said City, distant
thereon 248.00 feet North 36 053'00" West from the northwesterly corner of Higuera
and Nlpomo Street to the Point of Beginning; thence westerly at right. angles to
Nipomo Street 52.00 feet to a point; thence northwesterly parallel with Nipomo
Street to the center of San Luis Obispo Creek; thence northeasterly aloog.the
center line of said creek to the westerly line of Nipomo Street; thence South
36053'00" East along said westerly line of Nipomo Street to the Point of
Beginning.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF GRANTOR hereunto caused their name to be subscribed this
ay of 1993.
State of California J �y
County of s;i1c
On j4VC44 51 /" before me,
personally appearea CS , personally know to me (or proved to me on. the basis of
_
satisfactory evidence) to the person(s) whose names) is/aresu scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she4hey executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity6es), and that by his/her- /lheir signatures(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the ins n
WITNES m nd offic• I <�< `
'Y � OFFIC '•• `cAl
LILLIAN' D. Je.1•.'f.LL
rn G• T. v NOTARY FUBL:L•C<.L1F0RN1A
Signatur �1!
IENTURA C01NTY
Note: This Easement DVd will be recorded. Your signature(s) must be Y C P• NOY.25 19 4
InCotm the notary that the acknowledgement is for an instrument to be recorded. (California
Civil Code 1169, et.seq.)
���� ►�►►�►��a►��� �� i►►�IIIII IIII IIh1 ° "'� �� I(I city osAn luis oBispo
4
I 990 Palm Street /Post Office Box 8100 • San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by the
Easement Deed
dated March 5 1993,from The Creamery, A Limited Partnership
(James M. Harrison, General Partner)
to the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a Political Corporation, is hereby accepted by the
undersigned officer on behalf of the City Council pursuant to authority conferred by
Resolution No. 5370 (1984 Series), recorded June 15, 1984, in Volume 2604, Official
Records, Page 878, San Luis Obispo County, California, and the Grantee consents to
recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer or his agent.
Date:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
I.
Peg Pir&d, Mayor
ATTEST:
g6, Glaidwelj�tity Clerk
-
ttN. 12/92
n
1
it
ON
4�
RESOLUTION NO. 8145
I�
(1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING APPROVAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2126
LOCATED AT 500 STONERIDGE DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Tract 2126 and the Planning
Commission's recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof, makes the following findings:
1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements
are consistent with the general plan.
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of
development allowed in an R -1 -PD zone.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements
are not likely to cause serious health problems, substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not conflict with easement for access through (or use
of property within) the proposed subdivision.
5. The subdivision will not have a significant adverse impact
on the environment, subject to the mitigation measures of
the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified by the
City Council on April 28, 1992, and listed in Exhibit "A ",
being incorporated into the project, and the mitigation
monitoring program adopted with approval of the preliminary
development plan on July 21, 1992 being followed.
SECTION 2. Exception. That an exception to the parking and
driveway standards to enable more than four properties to be
served by the proposed private street is hereby approved based on
the following:
1. The exception will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the driveway or parking
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity since the
R -8145
C
Resolution No. 8145
Tract 2126
Page 2
(1993 Series)
n
proposed private street will be developed to allow for two
lanes of traffic with on- street parking and a conforming
turnaround area.
2. The exception will not adversely affect the health, safety
or general welfare of persons working or residing at the
site or in the vicinity since the principal types of
concerns associated with a larger number of parcels being
served by a private driveway such as provision for unimpeded
traffic and available parking are addressed.
3. The exception is reasonably necessary for the subdivider's
full enjoyment of uses upon the property.
SECTION 3. Conditions. The approval of the tentative map
for Tract 2126 be subject to the following conditions:
1. The subdivider shall relocate and construct the access road
to the Edna saddle water tank to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer, Utilities Engineer and Fire Department. Said
access road shall be constructed as an all- weather surface
capable of supporting heavy equipment and fire apparatus to
the satisfaction of.the City Engineer and Utilities
Engineer. Drainage proposed down the access road must be
discharged through an under - sidewalk drain per City
standards.
2. All proposed public streets (including street furniture such
as street lights, fire hydrants, street signs, etc...) must
be constructed to City Standards and to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer (street pavement shall be designed to a.
Traffic Index of 5.5). The subdivider shall install curb,
gutter and sidewalk along all public street frontages.
Sidewalks shall be 4.5 -feet in width.
3. The City Engineer reserves the right to make adjustments,
alterations and modifications to the proposed island and
cistern to accommodate reasonable access by Fire Department
apparatus and City equipment and to provide for public
facilities maintenance (including underground facilities).
4. The subdivider shall construct the off -site storm drain
system to an adequate point of disposal. Plans and
hydraulic calculations shall be prepared by a registered
civil engineer, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Provisions for overflow surface drainage shall be designed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series)
Tract 2126
Page 3
5. All proposed public mains and services, in the intersection
of Stoneridge and Bluerock, shall be constructed outside the
island and cistern structure within the street pavement
area.
6. The City shall not maintain or replace any special or
decorative pavements. The Homeowners' Association shall be
responsible for all special.or decorative pavement
maintenance and replacement (around proposed cistern & PD
homes - must be noted in the CC &R's). The City shall not
maintain any portion of the proposed cistern or building.
7. All lots shall be served with individual water, sewer, gas,
electric, telephone and cable TV services to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. All water services shall be sized to accommodate both the
domestic needs and fire sprinkler requirements with regards
to water pressure, to the satisfaction of the Utilities
Engineer and Fire Department.
9. Final alignment and grade of all proposed public water
mains, sewer mains and storm drains are subject to
adjustments to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
Utilities Engineer.
10. All sewer mains shall be terminated with a manhole, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and Utilities Engineer.
11. All cisterns, drain lines and associated facilities (as
shown on the landscape plan) to and from the cisterns are to
be privately owned and maintained by the Homeowners'
Association. An overflow system must be provided, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
12. The drainage pipe along the northerly tract boundary must be
accessible by City crews (public easement, access gates,
etc...), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A plan
for access shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to
the approval of the subdivision improvement drawings. Pipe
size and provisions for overflow must be accommodated to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Catch basins in each lot
shall be maintained by each lot owner.
13. The subdivider shall pay a pro -rata share (25 %) towards the
cost of installation of a new traffic signal along Broad
Street in the near vicinity of the project as determined by
the City Engineer and Caltrans.
Resolution No. 8145
Tract 2126
Page 4
(1993 Series)
14. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the subdivider shall
pay any applicable traffic impact fees, as calculated by the
City Engineer.
15. Street trees shal
individual homes.
with the approved
be required upon
Species shall be
design guidelines.
construction of
chosen in accordance
16. All boundary monuments, lot corners and centerline
intersections, BC's, EC's, etc..., shall be tied to the
City's control network. At least two control points shall
be used and a tabulation of the coordinates shall be
submitted with the Final Map. A computer floppy disk (5-
1/4" diameter), containing the appropriate data for use in
Autocad, shall also be submitted to the City Engineer.
17. Rockview Park improvements shall be modified as required to
accommodate the relocated water tank access road, to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department (including
landscaping, irrigation, etc...). Subdivider shall
guarantee and provide maintenance of new or modified
landscaping and facilities for one year after acceptance.
18. The City Council shall quitclaim the affected portion.of
Rockview Park to accommodate the change in the boundaries of
Rockview Park as shown on the tentative tract map.
19. Rockview Park shall either be irrigated from on -site water
sources or with reclaimed water from off -site. Specific
plans to accommodate this irrigation system shall be to the
approval of the Utilities Director and City Engineer.
20. A maintenance and monitoring program shall be prepared
outlining measures to assure that the proposed wetland area
is installed, established and monitored per the wetlands
mitigation program and to the approval of the City and the
Department of Fish and Game. An agreement between the City
and the developer incorporating the program shall be
executed prior to recordation of the final tract map. The
agreement shall include how the pipe, pump, float valve,
water amount, replantings, removal of invasives, the fence,
interpretive displays ad other wetland area components shall
be maintained.
The agreement shall require the developer to continue to
perform maintenance of plantings and the water system,
replace dead or dying plants, and provide annual reports
regarding the success of the wetland area to the City and
DFG for a specified time period of three years after
.J
Resolution No. 8145
Tract 2126
Page 5
(1993 Series)
I3
planting and water system installation. The report shall
include photographs of the wetland mitigation site, plant
survival statistics, a description of continuing
maintenance /monitoring, and new mitigation measures should
any aspect(s) of the mitigation fail.
21. Subdivider shall prepare conditions, covenants, and
restrictions (CC &R's) to be approved by the City Attorney
and Community Development Director prior to final map
approval. CC &R's shall contain the following provisions
that pertain to all lots:
a. Creation of a homeowners' association.
b. No parking except in approved, designated spaces.
C. Prohibition of storage or other uses which would
conflict with the use of garages for parking purposes.
d. No outdoor storage of boats, campers, motor homes, or
trailers nor long -term storage of inoperable vehicles.
e. No change in city- required provisions of the CC &R's
without prior City Council approval.
f. Homeowners' association shall file with the City Clerk
the names and addresses of all officers of the
homeowners' association within 15 days of any change in
officers of the association.
g. Homeowners' association shall be responsible for the
maintenance of the drainage swale behind Lots 17 -33 as
depicted on Sheet No. 3 of the vesting tentative tract
map.
h. Grant to the city the right to repair facilities and
other improvements if the homeowners' association fails
to perform, and to assess the homeowners' association
for expenses incurred, and the right of the city to
inspect the site at mutually agreed times to assure
conditions of CC &R's and final map are being met.
22. CC &R's shall contain
specifically to the
56,.59 & 60:
a. The homeowners'
and provide for
all common area
the following provisions that pertain
-.ourtyard cluster units, Lots 47 through
association shall enforce the CC &R's
professional, perpetual maintenance of
including private driveways, drainage,
Resolution No. 8145
Tract 2126
Page 6
(1993 Series)
parking lot areas, walls and fences, lighting, and
landscaping in a first class condition.
b. The homeowners' association shall provide for
professional, perpetual maintenance of all common area
including the hillside seep water collection system,
water cistern and all improvements within the
Stoneridge Drive turnaround.
C. Grant to the city the right to maintain common area and
other identified facilities if the homeowners'
association fails to perform, and to assess the
homeowners' association for expenses incurred, and the
right of the city to inspect the site at mutually
agreed times to assure conditions of CC &R's and final
map are being met.
d. Grant to the city the right to tow away vehicles on a
complaint basis which are parked in unauthorized
places.
e. No outdoor storage by individual units except in
designated storage areas.
f. Provision of appropriate "no parking" signs and
red - curbing along interior roadways as required by the
City Fire Department.
g. All garages shall be equipped with automatic garage
door openers and occupants shall be provided with two
remote - control units.
23. The subdivider shall provide a total of eight (8) guest
parking spaces within the cluster courtyard component of the
project (Lots 47 -56, 59 & 60) to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
24. The subdivider shall submit common driveway agreements,
including maintenance provisions, to the approval of the
Community Development Director for all common driveways
affecting Lots 14 -21 at the time of final map approval.
25. Individual lot development shall occur in accordance with
the adopted design guidelines. Any necessary changes to the
design guidelines to recognize conditions imposed upon by
the tract map, including specific review of.building colors
for Lots 17 -33 (using darker.shades of color palette
approved by the ARC), shall be to the approval of the
Community Development Director.
Ca
Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series)
Tract 2126
Page 7
26. Outlines of the approved building envelopes for Lots 1 -17
shall be shown on the final development plan with a cross
reference to the precise building envelopes and setbacks on
the approved development plan exhibit boards 1 -8 stored in
the Community Development Department. No homes, decks over
8 feet in height, garages, pools or accessory buildings may
be constructed outside of approved building envelopes.
27. Required tree screening shall be installed behind Lots 1 -17
as part of subdivision improvements to the approval of the
Community Development Director. Trees shall be planted so
that they do not interfere with the rear lot storm drainage
system to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Provisions
for on -going maintenance of trees by the developer until
individual sale of lots shall be made. The developer shall
be responsible for replacing dead trees on unsold lots.
28. The subdivider shall submit a detailed geotechnical
investigation and soils engineering report analyzing
existing conditions on the site and proposed grading
operations. Said investigation and report shall be to the
approval of the City Engineer and shall be submitted with
the final map. All improvement plans for the tract and
grading for individual development of lots shall comply with
the recommendations of the report.
29. Individual soils reports shall be required for all lots with
an average cross slope in excess of 20%. A document shall
be recorded prior to final map approval disclosing this
requirement.
30. All units shall be numbered in accordance with an addressing
plan approved by the Community Development Director.
31. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9 (b), the
subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold the harmless the
City and /or its agents, officers and employees from any
claim, action or proceeding against the City and /or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or
annul, the approval by the City of this subdivision, Tract
No. 188 -92 (County Tract No. 2126), and all actions relating
thereto, including but not limited to environmental review,
and action taken pursuant to Section 66462.5 of the
Subdivision Map Act to implement Condition No. 4 hereof.
32. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required
fire -flow for fire protection shall be provided to all
premises. Water services to Lots 14 -33, and possibly
others, may require minimum 1 -1/2 -inch meters to reduce
Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series)
Tract 2126
Page 8
pressure losses for residential fire sprinkler design. The
minimum sizes shall be provided unless hydraulic
calculations are provided which indicate lesser sizing is
determined acceptable.
33. All structures shall be equipped with NFPA 13 -D residential
automatic fire sprinkler systems. The provision of
individual fire sprinkler booster pumps may be required on
Lots 14 -33, and possibly others, to provide minimum
pressure, depending upon height and configuration. For
disclosure purposes, a document shall be recorded for lots
requiring booster pumps to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and Utilities Director.
34. All buildings, as well as the park area, Edna Saddle water
tank, and the open space easement, shall be accessible to
Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways meeting
the requirements of the San Luis Obispo Fire Department
Development Guidelines.
35. Proposed water main size within the common access and
utility easement giving access to lots 47 through 60 shall
be sized in conformance with City Public Works Standards. A
fire hydrant is required to be installed on this private
common access easement to meet requirements of hydrant
spacing as specified in the San Luis Obispo Fire Department
Development Guidelines.
36. All structures shall be provide with approved numbers
(addresses) in such a position as to be plainly visible and
legible from the street fronting the property. Lettering
shall be a minimum of 5" high on a contrasting background.
Common driveways shall have separate street names or be
otherwise identified to avoid possible confusion during Fire
Department response to emergency situations.
On motion of Council Member Rappa
seconded by Council Member Romero , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 8145 (1993-Series)
Tract 2126
Page 9
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of
April 1993.
Mayor pej Pinard
ATTEST:
Qitk Clerk Dian R. Gladwell
APPROVED:
000/ i CAt_
i Admin' tra ive Offi r
I�
W
z
O
Q
A
Q
~ U
= a
F Q
z
Z
a
W
G4
h
h
N
C
O
.y
as
b
0
Q �
o�
d 6
o�
I�
W..
Fr, u
Gn
i
va
r+ w
F"
V!
ao
�v
a�
� c
c ,o
o�
e�
W�
+• a
VJ
°0w
1 -3
i W i =d 1 a,
U O O Es 0 .c
yoCd
•� C h � Gar ^ °
S 3 o d aUV m
•a S. O >, U
y o"a > y
O,y6E0w
o„c2'tioE
aoyv��Om
MEEit y
n.
cc .y�Uo�
U
3OVr�
toy.a.::v.°
0!
c0 tw>%
C
d X U U
Y
cd d v 55
O y
.yam �' �•+ ^�
aE os
�a0c
>
>co�v`o
•cr. cz cc
d•>�o
gmv°' � a
°9
z c�
96
S
bb m�
ca 4! Syr cc
MM O
'Oa0 >�y'�¢
a. 54�Ay
O t U cw
CCI
y iQ 1. • Q ~ W
w U ra.. U Q. U co
O y=U y a c U EA cd
��i •.Qr @ .°Yi
i • 0. Nr
I
aO 3 �
'C O 0% .a
co r- p C
�o ba
0 t.
.: aa:°
seo °� =
ca
V y h
a c.., a�•
td y
y
>a
Oy
0.o
ro �
� O
� L
C].
cd _
Q! L
O Q
W3 c
CZ
E ' c
loEms
U E
C c
E E °
c E
is S d�
� N �
3 s •�
Y
y
.y 74� Q
o a c
u
1•0 Em
:;?EV
O O
C
y c
Q
Y
aa�
s _
o ro
a
a
0
U
v
S
W
W
z
O
a
v
.I y
Q COD
U
a
a
z
W
z
Qtr
Gz-.7
fs.
Cq
•^� esS R
-
a 9b 96 �D
•y y H y
O S_ C C 'C 0 E_, � � 5.A �Q O
cc
a) w a a o _a cz
e=D o = e =:? a = °'�" �_ ages
V C•�b >+ e�C = cam' a 4J.�
a y �O is Ob R;^ C 3w C.�
.. cc woo cc o.
0 Zu =o � 0
R 0 0 _ O -0 pp m ec
_
h= oar 0 to 0
C 4"' O fn W 'yC = 5.. O s�'" a •'^. CZ
y •a.+ Q• (.+ 0 � y' iG " bl 3 0 j0 o O y in"� •U N U 6i wv ." Q 6) L'
R ,t] O L•'. G' Q �i Q w >'f
R P. ewe C :a .RO C v GL ilm in Z �
a,
f3.
to s.
0
C .� •fl C w a. _ `" dD �- d C bA G °j-• d t
= oaD = o ono•., 0 r- � �s.cc o �
__ ^ �
C.
O G ° d 0 tz� = R= CZ
vt 'p y fl �.� R 0 3 7 eya R
aa ID
pp _
O
2 <V R � >
y a 0 O = R c- d pC 3 R � > O Ow O tDI = O y N _ R G
R U = O CO y� N �r
R .0 w U. H .� �� G d r. cc 00 'r+i
R R
=u cab �Ea�x.0. "off. 0wo� c = °'°'Nb
W O.R Oh�S� .��o E•¢a.S UR�sscn�
C13 -0
++ a
— y
R R U >+ Q•
mw c 3 to a
Ln
v0= u o ado 00
Vcn em CZ
1 -a
a
c
0
U
.r
d
F
h
a
CA
W
Z
0
rF�
V
r.y
Q
EF
a
z
O
x
L�r
O
Q
cc
H
N
h
o
E
C
0
.y
�U
d
rmi
gn
d
a
0
L 'Q
p u >>
2
OD �
ell�
a+
ram u
�S
d
R
U�
a Gil
F
u
m
~ v
ry
d
E�
V
aL
W "O
v eo
� •^C
C
C� •
c b v
ca
° > _ cz
01s
Oto= U
C L. y . a
a°
Ophw O
•y .0 w •y^j d
C�Ocu
u > t:
cc v
W. d ►" r .yy
0
O y ONw w
El-
W
cd
g? U N
= w
c U
r
° � h
C U U
�b �
c U.
r
> Cd
Aay
1 -5
-0ts
ca U
ca 0
V °
a.
a
w '7
O pr
C w
O
gw U
O bo
S v •v
0
N
7
V
.b
C
C6
E U
cC
.r
•� 3
h
U h
U
Q �
h 0
C
� w
p .^ O
� O u
a cz
�w di
C
rr. •tyC
cz v
U b y EA
c0 y
cc
w U
a9ynS
s
> O rn
� 3
LV
U Cc
w
a.os
U O aA
O C rA
o > �
W U
N
M h
r
S
S
S
c b v
ca
° > _ cz
01s
Oto= U
C L. y . a
a°
Ophw O
•y .0 w •y^j d
C�Ocu
u > t:
cc v
W. d ►" r .yy
0
O y ONw w
El-
W
cd
g? U N
= w
c U
r
° � h
C U U
�b �
c U.
r
> Cd
Aay
1 -5
-0ts
ca U
ca 0
V °
a.
a
w '7
O pr
C w
O
gw U
O bo
S v •v
0
N
7
V
.b
C
C6
E U
cC
.r
•� 3
h
U h
U
Q �
h 0
C
� w
p .^ O
� O u
a cz
�w di
C
rr. •tyC
cz v
U b y EA
c0 y
cc
w U
a9ynS
s
> O rn
� 3
LV
U Cc
w
a.os
U O aA
O C rA
o > �
W U
N
M h
u -
w
U U
y
yc�
9"
,y .y
Cd
S S
Cd
y „ to
W A �C-
h
F•( 7 � Q � � y
Q =_E
@ eC C U O.� U
w 4i VJ . W2
%L Tw Ta y
0-9
r.
a
F� W Ua �3•�a�i oh3
JW d L
xco
0.
4) CZ CA cis
Z CL
to
4.•
r\
IG O.0 A V 121 E y
Vi = •h C 4.n F
� L� � E� ep,= 3 � a �n'v •�
u m
py. ..,..
m.� = fl 8 U
cis
� w y c O
y
►•M Q/
1-6
Errata to Section 4.1.4
Over the course of the EIR review, the applicant has agreed that all of the lots that back
up to Lawrence Drive (Lots 1 -18 on the original site plan used evaluated in the EIR) will
be developed with single -story homes. All of these lots would have approved building
envelopes specifying maximum allowed building heights. A maximum building height of
15 feet would be allowed at the rear of all lots, with a 20 foot maximum building height
allowed in the front portions of specified lots toward the street (Stoneridge Drive)..
For clarification, building height would be an absolute measurement, the highest point of
the building at any one point, rather than an elevation above average natural grade.
Therefore, many of the original mitigations related to building height and massing would
be superseded by the following mitigation measure:
■ Lots 1 -17 shown on the revised site plan shall be limited to single -story development.
Building height shall be measured as the highest point of the building above natural
grade, rather than an elevation above average natural grade as outlined in the city's
zoning regulations. A maximum building height of 20 feet may be allowed. At the
time of development plan submittal, a plan for Lots 1 -17 addressing height and
privacy issues shall be submitted to the City Council for approval.
Implementation of the mitigation measure described above necessitates revisions to the
existing mitigation measures in Section 4.1.4; therefore, in conjunction with the previous
mitigation measure, the following revised mitigation measures would reduce the impacts to
neighborhood compatibility to a level of insignificance:
■ The rear lot setbacks for Lots 1 -17 shall be 25 feet.
■ The applicant shall install tree screening along the rear of Lots 1 -17 to insure further
protection of privacy for residents of Lawrence Drive at the time of installation of
subdivision improvements. Tree screening shall include a mix of tall, open skyline
trees and medium to large shrubs a maximum of 15 feet high.
■ The following design restrictions shall be implemented:
1.) Decks more than eight feet above natural ground level shall be prohibited;
and
2.) Massing of development must be such that no part of a building over 15 and
20 feet above the natural ground level may be within 30 and 50 feet of the
north property line, respectively.
■ A subsurface storm drainage system shall be constructed that runs from Lawrence
Drive to Meadow Creek.
C)
Errata to Section 4.2.4
In addition, the second mitigation included in Section 4.2.4 on page 4-40 listed below would
be superseded:
■ No more than 33 percent of the floor area would be on the second story. The
majority of the second story would be massed toward the street frontage of the lot.
The third mitigation listed in Section 4.2.4 on page 4-40 would be modified to eliminate the
references to second story development from the second sentence as shown below:
■ Architectural review of sensitive lots * * (the hillside lots and lots backing up to
Lawrence Drive) will be required prior to issuance of building permits for these lots.
This review shall consider
as —the placement of backyard windows and decks in relation to the adjacent
Lawrence Drive units. For hillside lots, architectural review shall consider structure
elevations on a lot -to -lot basis.
* * In the case of the sensitive lots identified in the EIR, the proposed design
guidelines endorsed by Staff and the Architectural Review Commission,
indicate that the architectural review requirement included in the EIR would
be handled by planning staff review of plans for consistency with approved
building envelopes and the design guidelines prior to submittal of a building
permit, rather than a formal application for architectural review (see pages
6 -7 of the design guidelines).
�� tC��
C � �-
��
���� ' �
��
a��z\
�c�
C�
RESOLUTION NO.8144 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR SHARING THE COST OF ELECTRICAL
FACILITIES ON STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING
THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SIGN AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
WHEREAS, the State of California, through its Department of Transportation has presented
an Agreement for sharing cost of State highway electrical facilities with the City of San Luis Obispo
effective January 1, 1993, and to remain in effect until amended or terminated.
WHEREAS, the City Council has read said Agreement in full and is familiar with the
contents thereof:
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that this Agreement is routine and falls within the
responsibility of the Department of Public Works;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that: (1)
said Agreement for Sharing Cost of STATE highway electrical facilities within the City of San Luis
Obispo is hereby approved and the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the same on behalf
of said CITY; and (2) The Director of the Department of Public Works is authorized to sign future
amendments of said Agreement.
Council Council
On motion of Mbr. Rappa ,seconded by Member Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted, this Elh day of April ,
1993.
ATTEST: Mayo Peg Pinard
C Clerk Dia e la ell
R -8144
(A- 31- 93 -CC)
JA
RESOLUTION NO. 8143 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING
AN AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY AND
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SIGN AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
WHEREAS, the State of California, through its Department of Transportation has presented
an Agreement for Maintenance of the STATE highways in the CITY of San Luis Obispo, effective
as of January 1, 1993, and to remain in effect until amended or terminated.
WHEREAS, the City Council has read said Agreement in full and is familiar with the
contents thereof:
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that this Agreement is routine and falls within the
responsibility of the Department of Public Works;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that: (1)
said Agreement for Maintenance of the STATE highways in the CITY is hereby approved and the
Public Works Director is authorized to sign the same on behalf of said CITY; and (2) The Director
of the Department of Public Works is authorized to sign future amendments of said Agreement.
Council Council
On motion of Mbr. Rappa ,seconded by Mbr. Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa; Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of April ,
1993. n
Mayor Id Pinard
ATTEST:
1 /iL l
r,
•/, /ar J mss.. '
•R -8143
(A= 30- 93 -CQ)
t
l� � �1'' �'''``1
ry�
� � �;.� �,
y `:.J
�' ��a- -�
(1?' a
�� �� rJ
RESOLUTION N0.8142 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 2059
(Arnold and Diana Volny, Subdividers) .
WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning Tract
2059 as contained in Resolution No. 6964 (1991 Series), and
WHEREAS, all conditions required per Resolution No. 6964 (1991
Series) of said Tract No. 2059 have been met.
WHEREAS, the final map is in substantial conformance with the
approved tentative map.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that final map approval is hereby
granted for Tract No. 2059 approving 6 airspace condominium units.
On motion of Council Member Rappa , seconded by Council. Member Romero and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Rappa, Romero, Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 6th day of April
1993.
ATTEST: OTAYOR PEG PINARD
s
CLERR DI R. GLADWELL
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ty to ey
R -8142
I
■r
Resolution No. 8142 (1993 Series)
Page two
Community Dev 1 ment Director
City E gineer
G : \WP.51 \DReview \Misc \Tr- 2059.wp
0 � °��
�vJ`�..�
���� �a�,
4��
a.� � . ,
-� �- �,,,
,.� �
w `c; �
i� ��sz'
��
RESOLUTION NO. 8141 (1993 series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ESTABLISHING THE
ECONOMIC STRATEGY TASK FORCE
AS AN AD HOC COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the need to assemble experts from a wide
variety of business professions to address the economic stability of San Luis Obispo; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has endorsed the concept of an Economic Strategy
Task Force with the goal of implementing a more defined, proactive Economic Stability
Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY
COUNCIL that:
Section 1. An ad hoc special purpose committee, to be known as the "Economic
Strategy Task Force" is established. The members shall be appointed by the City Council
in a manner, and for a term of office, determined by the City Council at the time of
appointment.
Section 2. The Economic Strategy Task Force shall perform the following
principal functions:
a) To develop recommended economic goals and strategies based upon
Council direction.
b) Goals and strategies should be completed in the form of a
recommendation to Council by June, 1993.
c) An evaluation and progress report shall be presented to Council in
October 1993.
On motion of Council Member Roalman,seconded by Council Member Settle
and on the following roll call vote:
R -8141
1
Resolution No. 8141 (1993 Series)
March 16, 1993
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle, Rappa, Romero, and Mayor Pinaid
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing.resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of March, 1993.
r
Peg Pinard, Mayor
ATTEST:
�� ! :.' iR M "1, mo
1 " J I/
APPROVED:
J LCity Administrative Officer
1
0 - OEM WME
'r-C.- Attomey
`y �r���
��� ��1�
�; ��
RESOLUTION NO. 8140 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2112
LOCATED AT 680 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:.
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of the tentative map of Tract 2112 and the Planning
Commissionfs recommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof, makes the following findings:
1. The massing of the subdivision is not consistent with
neighborhood design policies of the General Plan Land Use
Element, is not compatible with existing development
patterns in the vicinity, and predominantly results from the
large size of the proposed dwelling units.
2.. The site is not physically suited for the type and density
of development proposed.
3. The design of the subdivision may cause significant adverse
environmental effects, and would adversely affect public
safety, by increasing traffic congestion and hazards.
4. There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate
traffic congestion and hazards, other than disapproval of
the proposed project, or approval of the project at a
reduced density.
5. Chapter 4.5 of the California Government Code establishes
time limits for processing of development projects, which
prevent the Council from granting a continuance to consider
approval at a reduced density.
6. The proposed project would not comply with Municipal Code
Section 17.82.140(H), Condominium Regulations - Energy
Conservation.
a
R -8140
Resolution No. 8140
Tract 2112
Page 2
(1993 Series)
�J Y
SECTION 2. Denial. The Council therefore resolves to deny
without prejudice the tentative.map for proposed Tract 2112.
On motion of Council Member Roalman
seconded by Council Member Settle , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Members Rappa and Romero
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day
of March , 1993.
ILI
Mayor Peg finard
ATTEST:
Cit erk i ne R. adwell
APPROVED:
ity A inistrative Officer
C�'tYrYc l
O
CO
RESOLUTION NO. 8139 (1993 Series)
SUPPORTING THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY POETRY FESTIVAL
WITH FINDINGS OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
FOR WAIVER OF CONDITIONS FOR THE
USE OF THE COMMUNITY ROOM AT THE CITY /COUNTY LIBRARY
WHEREAS, the 10th Annual San Luis Obispo County Poetry Festival sponsored by
the San Luis Obispo Literacy Council is scheduled to be held in the city of San Luis Obispo
on July 23 -25 and July 30- August 1, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the festival will be open to the general public free of charge and will
include poetry readings, an international exhibition of visual poetry and a book fair featuring
the authors and literary presses in our county; and
WHEREAS, a nationally recognized poet will be invited to provide a special reading
with ticket sales from this event to benefit the San Luis Obispo Literacy Council work to
break the cycle of illiteracy in our county.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo
enthusiastically supports the 10th Annual San Luis Obispo County Poetry Festival which
provides substantial community benefit in the form of cultural enrichment for city residents
and financial support for the non -profit San Luis Obispo Literacy Council; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
does hereby find that special circumstances of the public interest fund raising of the festival,
the hours of the festival and the advanced planning for the festival are sufficient to warrant
a waiver of customary conditions for City/County Library Community Room use.
On motion of Council Member settle , and seconded by Council Member
Romero , and on the following roll call vote:.
R -8139
T.
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 8139(1993 SERIES)
ID
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of March. , 1993.
1
Mayor Pee Pinard
ATTEST:
J
� 1 W l�A
APPROVED:
City A 'nistrative Officer
dg \arespoet
I�C�,� ��
��
.:_:_
,.. ,
t � �
v �
RESOLUTION NO 8138(1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES TO
INCLUDE THE OLD SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD WATER TOWER,
LOCATED AT 1100 IRIS STREET IN THE AREA KNOWN AS RAILROAD SQUARE
WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5.197 establishing the
"Master List of Historic Resources ", along with procedures for adding properties to the listing;
and
WHEREAS, on July 6, 1982 the Architectural Review Commission found the retired
Southern Pacific Railroad Water Tower to be historically and architecturally significant, and
denied a request by Southern Pacific Transportation Company to demolish the structure; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo acquired the old Southern Pacific Railroad
water tower and a small underlying lot located at 1100 Iris Street, as shown on Exhibit A, from
Southern Pacific Transportation Company to preserve and stabilize the structure in its original
location; and
WHEREAS, on February 22, 1993 the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the
historical documentation on the water tower, Exhibit C, and nominated the Old Water Tower
for inclusion on the Master List of Historic Resources; and
WHEREAS, this City Council considered the nomination during a public hearing on
March 16, 1993 pursuant to historic preservation guidelines established by Council Resolution
No. 6157 (1987 Series); and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, historical
documentation as described in Exhibits B and C, the staff report, and on the City's Historical
R -8138
Council Resolution No. 8138(1993 Series)
Page 2
Preservation Program Guidelines the following:
SECTION. 1. Addition to Master List of Historic Resources. The Old Southern Pacific
Railroad Water Tower is hereby added to the Master List of Historic Resources as a Type ##4
property because it meets the following national register criteria:
A. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad
patterns of the City's history.
B. It is of symbolic importance to the community, representing the significant role
played by the railroad in the growth and development of the City of San Luis
Obispo.
C. It is a unique and scenic landmark at a major city gateway, associated with a
period in the City's history when the San Luis Obispo railroad yard was the main
service facility for the steam locomotives travelling the coastal route between Los
Angeles and San Francisco.
SECTION 2. The Community Development Director is hereby directed to amend the Master
List of Historic Resources to include the Old Southern Pacific Railroad Water Tower.
On motion of Council Member Settle
following roll call vote:
seconded by Council Member Romeroand on the
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of March, 1993.
Council Resolution No. 8138 (1993 Series)
Page 3
Mayor Peg #inard
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
P�L� ,e4w, .a"'l
John unn, ty Ad mistrative�fficer
Attachments:
• Exhibit A - Documentation of Historical Significance
• Exhibit B - Historic Resources Inventory
Z
I�
R H
R-
9 _S
` -O�
R-�
�v
O -PD
\
yo bt \
�
,R -2 -S,
Y" \
�,�/ I , urnrs -�
'\ R-2
R -2 -S
,2G %
eel
n A
S�.
. V
- r +
�O
3
rs s
.s \
(t
y _
J -13 -R
VICINITY 2INP - OLD S.P.R.R. A1.4TER. TO? +'EP.
1100 Tris Street
r
IT F
s
c- I
` -O�
R-�
�v
O -PD
\
yo bt \
�
,R -2 -S,
Y" \
�,�/ I , urnrs -�
'\ R-2
R -2 -S
,2G %
eel
n A
S�.
. V
- r +
�O
3
rs s
.s \
(t
y _
J -13 -R
VICINITY 2INP - OLD S.P.R.R. A1.4TER. TO? +'EP.
1100 Tris Street
r
IT F
DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The purpose of this evaluation sheet is to document the reasons why properties recommended
for inclusion on the San Luis Obispo Master List of Historical Resources are in fact historically
significant. Specific criteria for "national register consideration" should be identified for all
recommended type #4 properties.
Property Address: 1100 Iris Street (nearest street address to water tower).
Property Use: Former railroad water tower, no longer used for water storage.
Recommended Numeric Ranking: 4
ARCHITECTURAL FACTORS:
1. Style:
Is the structure an excellent example of a distinctive architectural style? (An excellent example
is a building where the style has not been altered by the introduction of conflicting architectural
elements.)
X Yes No The massive timber tower supports, tongue and groove box car roof-
ing and metal tank typify turn of the century railroad construction.
Is the structure an example of an architectural style seldom seen in San Luis Obispo?
X Yes No Built in 1940,.the water tower is only such structure in San Luis
Obispo and one of only four water towers remaining in their original
2. Design: location in California.
Does the structure have significant aesthetic appeal because of demonstrated craftsmanship, use
of detailing and execution of style?
X Yes No (see above)
Does the structure incorporate unique details or architectural features seldom seen in San Luis
Obispo?
x Yes No (see above)
Was the structure designed by a master architect such as Frank Lloyd Wright?
Yes X No (If yes, name person
�C
Page 2 -- Documentation of Historical Significance
3. Significance of Building Designer
Was the structure designed by a person who made significant contributions tot he state or region
such as Julia Morgan?
Yes X No (If yes, name person
Was the structure designed by an architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant
contributions to San Luis Obispo?
Yes -_ No (If yes, name person
Was the structure designed by a "pioneer" architect in the city or county?
Yes X No (If yes, name person
4. Landmarks
Does the structure have a symbolic importance to the community or is it a notable community
or neighborhood landmark? (see attached Historic Resources Survey)
X Yes' No
HISTORICAL FACTORS:
1. Residents or Tenants
Was the structure occupied by a significant community leader -- eg. mayor or congressman?
Yes
X No (If yes, name person
Was the structure occupied by a community or public servant who made early, unique or
outstanding contributions to important local affairs?
_ Yes X No (If yes, name person
Was the structure occupied by a person with fame or outstanding recognition at the local,
regional, state or national level?
Yes x No (If yes, name
Page 3 - Documentation of Historical Significance
J:
Was the structure occupied by a person or persons (eg. families) that made important
contributions to the community?
Yes X No (If yes, .name person(s)
Was the structured by a business or public agency that made significant contributions
to the historical development of the community?
X Yes No (If yes, identify business Southern Pacific Railroad.)
2. Historical Events
Was the structure or site involved in a landmark, famous, or first -of- its -kind event?
Yes X No (If yes, identify event )
Did the structure or site make unique or interesting contributions to the history of the city (eg.
the Chinese - American cultural activities)?
Yes X No
3. Historical Context
Was the structure directly associated with early, first, or major patterns of local history (eg. the
County Museum)? Growth and development of San Luis Obispo centered around and /or
dependent on the expansion of the railroad in town.
X Yes No
Was the structure directly associated with secondary patterns of local history?
Yes X No
Does the structure occupy its original site?
X Yes No
Prepared By: Jeff Hook, Secretary to the Cultural Heritage Committee
Date: March 3, 1993
State of Catifomia —The Resour• 19e,
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND F EA..JN
HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY
IDENTIFICATION
1, Common name:
2 Historic name:
se- No.
SHL No. NR Status !
HABS HAER_Lc _ _ : C
UTM: A
B 0
R o Wa Tow
S T T.T -t Tank
Pacific
for 65„000 gal. Stee
3. Street or rural address:
ll00 Iris Street _
Ci San Luis Obispo
Zip 93�— County San Luis Obispo
4. Parcel number`. o03-57 —
5. Present Owner: City of San Luis Obispo Address:
990 Palm St.
City
San Luis Obispo Zip 93403 Ownership is; Public � ry
�Prate �—
g. Present Use: Unused
Original use Water stora a for steam locomotives
DESCRIPTION welded steel plate tank
7a. Architectural style: Timber on concrete foundation;
earance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its
7b. Briefly describe the present physical app
original condition:
wa from. its original construction.
The. old S.P. Water Tower stands in its or location adjacent to the railroad
passenger station; it has not been modified in any Y
The present condition reflects a lack of use and lack of maintenance since the .late in
1950's. The concrete foundation tistin m nforcing1steel. The timbera tower aissin
the material that may penetrate
g
ood condition but has developed numerous cracks S�drepairsinuoneolocation. The
its construction in 1940; there is evidence of p a
of the steel plate used in the tank is present
tank has lost most of its - roofing materials; although the main structural members
are present. Rust and pitting
lace although the indica-
throughout; there is dried mud and some wood debris inside the tank. The indicator
board, used he show ng marker)lhaslbeenllost. The site is undisturbed from its
for plate (the sliding grown up into contact
original condition except for the growth of trees which have An adjacent
with the structure. Several large and picturesque p g
railroad warehouse building also cononebhundredttwentyt (120)sfeetnunderlyingnthear
parcel, approximately sixty (60) by — tower is owned_by the City.
...•
8. Construction date: Factual 1940
Estimated--
g, Architect ^T a built from —
stock , plans_of railroad
(tank); tower designed by SP
10. Builder railroad
rifir
11. APprox• property size (in feet)
Frontage _12D, Depth-Iiii
or approx: acreage. •?
12.
Date(s) of enclosed photographs
"4 r October S 1988
F
36 Ex it
DPR 523 (Rev. 11/85)
13. Condition: Excellent _Goon _ Fair_ Deteriorated -; No lone existence
14. Alterations: None
15. Surroundings; (Check more than one if necessary) Open land _Scattered buildings t Densely built -up _
Residential X Industrial X Commercial Other: Residential on east: part of railroad station
18. Threats to site: None known _Private development Zoning Vandalism X
Public Works project Other: Continued deterioration /weathering
17. Is the structure: On its original site? yes Moved? Unknown?
18. Related features: Railroad warehouse (outbuilding) and large palm trees; active station nearby
SIGNIFICANCE
14. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site.)
The old S.P. Railroad Water Tower in San Luis Obispo is only one of two or three remaining
in the historically significant former Coast Division., that extended 'from San .dose to LOS
Angeles (now a part of the Sacramento Division). It was one of the fixed objects that it
took to support the use of steam locomotives throughout the rail system. It was built in
late 1940 when ten (10) passenger trains a day traversed the coast route. It was built
near the station to expedite the process of filling the steam engines whle.at the same
time passengers were boarding. The tank was built from standard plans that the railroad
kept; this design was developed in 1904 and revised in 1945. The timber tower was designed
separately for intended use in Santa Barbara, however notes on the original plans say that
it was never built there. The tower plans show.it was designed in 1939, revised in 1940
for San Luis Obispo. It remained in use until 1956. It was later used to supply water to
Amtrak (passenger) trains for use in their steam radiators (space heating). It was also
used to supplement on -site fire fighting capabilities. In its original location and.un-
alterred appearance, and as part of an active railroad station property, this tower %tank
is .a strong visual backdrop. The entire setting appears as a historic vignette.
20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is
checked, number in order of importance.)
Architecture 3 Arts & Leisure
Economic/Industrial 1 Exploration/Serdement 2
Government _ Military
Religion Social/Education
21. Sources (List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews
andtheirdates). Records of Southern Pacific;
Robert Vessely, RCE (1987): "Railroad (dater
Tower Rehabilitation Study ".
22. Date form prep
By (name) —
City
Phone:
Obispo, 990 Palm
Zip 93403
Locational sketch map (draw and label site and .
surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks):
3
The appearance of the railroad water tower in 1988 is very much the same as it was when
completed in late 1940. It is located in its original position adjacent to the railroad
station property which still serves as San Luis Obispo's train depot. Changes from its
original appearance are primarily due to its age and lack of maintenance. The roof has
partially collapsed, some of the tower members are warped or cracked, the tank lacks
paint and the indicator plate is missing. The tank was originally proposed as a means of
saving time during train stops in San Luis Obispo. The steam locomotives in use on the
coast route at that time had to stop twice in San Luis Obispo -- once at the station for
passengers and again at the roundhouse a little farther down the tracks to take on
water. Installation of the 65,000 gallon steel storage tank near the station allowed the
trains to take on water at the same time - a - s passenger loading. The tank remained in
service until 1956 when the last of the stem engines was decommissioned.
The City of San Luis Obispo, the current owner of the structure and site, commissioned an
engineering survey of the structure in 1987. Original construction documents Were.
obtained with the cooperation of Southern Pacific. From these drawings it is apparent
that the tank was built from a set of standard plans that Southern Pacific used from
which almost anything in their system could be built. However, the tower which supports
the tank was built from plans drawn originally for use in Santa Barbara but later used
here. Field measurements were taken during the survey to verify plan dimensions.
The tank is twenty -four (24) feet in diameter and twenty (20) feet high, constructed of
one - quarter (1/4) inch steel plates riveted together. The bottom of the tank is of the -
same steel plate supported by six (6) inch steel joists spaced at eighteen (18) inches on
center. The joists rest on twelve (12) inch steel beams which run around the perimeter
of the tank forming an octagon with two beams across the center of the tank perpendicular
to the joists. The roof is a simple wood frame of two by six (2 x 6) inch lumber bolted
to the top rim of the tank. The roof covering is shown on the original plans to be
tongue and groove "car roofing ". The standard plans for this tank show a twelve (12)
inch diameter spout attached to the side of the tank with an outlet and. valve at the
base. Since this tank was located too far from the tracks for the trains to be watered
directly from an attached spout, the spout was left off and a sixteen (16) inch diameter
service pipe was run from the bottom of the tank to trackside. The indicator plate, a
horizontal marker that. slid up and down the indicator board to show the water level
inside the tank, is missing today. However, the board is in its original position.
There is no evidence that the name "San Luis Obispo" was ever painted on the tank.
The tower which supports the tank consists of twelve (12), ten by ten (10 x 10) inch
posts with four by eight (4 x 8) inch cross- braces. The tower has a concrete foundation
consisting of an eighteen (18) inch thick slab with a square concrete pier under each
post. The plans show the piers to be thirty (30) inches square at the base tapering to
twenty -four (24) inches square at about two feet above the slab; the actual construction
differs in that the piers do not taper. The tower members are attached to steel base
plates with three- quarter (3/4) inch bolts and the plates are attached to the concrete
piers by means of anchor bolts. The plans show that all timbers were to be
"Burnettized ". In Steel and Timber Structures (Hoot and Kinne, 1924) this process is
described as a preservation treatment of lumber with zinc chloride injected under
pressure. Since this material is water soluble it probably has been entirely lost due to
rain over the years. The cross braces were noted to be connected to the posts by means
of bolts with "toothed ring connectors ". Simplified Design of Roof Trusses (Parker,
1941) notes that these were even then an obsolete version of a split ring connector; now
commonly used in heavy timber construction to increase the capacity of a bolted
connection.
HT-031T
i
In California's historically significant Coast Division railroad water towers were a
relatively short - lived, but essential part of the fixed "objects" that it took to support
the rolling stock of the rails. The power of these physical objects in recalling the
history of the rails is disproportionate to their actual numbers. Where they have
survived, railroad water towers provide a strong visual image uniquely associated with
railroads. Railroad water towers are part architecture, part equipment. In the
landscape their appearance is always a reminder or guidepost to the unseen hundreds of
miles of rails that lay on the land. Together with a few remaining old stations and
roundhouses, railroad water towers tell us about a mode of transportation, powered
virtually since its inception by steam engines that was dependent on reliable water
storage nearby.
The Coast Division was once the lifeline of the railroad system in California, built in
spite of ,numerous seemingly impassable topographic features, such as Cuesta Grade in San
Luis Obispo County. For many years segments of the coast rails existed as fragments
until labor gangs and the promise of profits forged the complete system. In the Coast
Division (which became the Western Division in 1964, and now is part of the Sacramento
Division) there are only two or three water towers /tanks remaining. Except in San Luis
Obispo, they have had inappropriate modifications or survive in neglect with no
restoration plans; the rest have been systematically demolished by the railroad for
safety or liability reasons.
The water tower was only a part of the raw material supply system for the steam
locomotives. Often unseen, off -site, was a railroad- operated water treatment plant where
the local water source was processed to remove suspended solids, minerals and salts prior
to use.. Without such filtration and chemical treatment, there would have been an.
eventual •build up and fouling of the boilers used in the locomotives.
This water tower shares a common history with many others, now gone. But it has a unique
history too. Unlike most others which were torn down or moved following their
obsolesence, this tower and tank went on to serve two other uses. It held water for the
space heating system (radiators) used in diesel passenger locomotives used until recently.
in Amtrak passenger cars (now replaced with an all - electric system). The tank was also
used for supplemental fire protection at the'San Luis Obispo station, connected to
on -site hydrants in addition to the municipal system.
The water tower in San Luis Obispo is centrally located in the state, promeniently
visible to the public as part of an active station, and well loved in the local community
and among railroad enthusiasts. It has the greatest, realizable potential for being
restored and conserved becuase:
1) City Ownership - It is owned by the City of San Luis Obispo which rejected a
demolition request by the railroad in 1982;
2) Authentic Setting - It is a part of an active railroad property, adjacent to the
newly refurbished station in daily use;
3) Modest Cost - The costs of restoration are modest, and if undertaken now would
preclude further deterioration or structural failure;
4) Ready to Implement - The city has completed a full engineering survey, prepared a
restoration program and all plans necessary for impleme - allIBIT
22
-;jV
o 0
1
J'
RESOLUTION NO. 8137 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S
ACTION GRANTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING
NEW OFFICES AT 1026, 1028, 1038 AND 1042 PALM STREET, (ARC 129 -92).
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. That this council, after consideration of the appeal,
public testimony, Cultural Heritage Committee comments, the
Architecture Review Commission's action on February 1, 1993
granting a mitigated negative declaration and approving two new
office buildings at 1026, 1028, 1038 and 1042 Palm Street (ER 129-
92, ARC 129 -92) and staff recommendations and reports thereon,
makes the following findings:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the prevailing
architectural character of the government center area in-terms of
building scale, massing, and architectural design.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan,
Architectural Review Guidelines, and with the Historic
Preservation Program Guidelines.
3. The proposed additions, exterior alterations, or related new
construction will not destroy or significantly detract from
historic elements of the property at 1026 Palm Street, and new
work is not sufficiently differentiated from the existing
building to protect its architectural integrity or character.
4. The proposed project complies with the requirements of the
City's Environmental Guidelines and the California Environmental
Quality Act.
SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The City Council hereby
affirms the Architectural Review Commission's action granting a
Negative Declaration subject to the following mitigation measures
R -8137
Council Resolution No. 8137 (1993 Series)
Page 2
being included in the project:
1. Mitigation measure #1 of ER 129 -92 shall be modified to
require only installation of new sound - proofing glazing or
the equivalent (not wall insulation, walls or fencing, or
landscaping as recommended in the initial study), to the
approval of the Community Development Director, with cost
not to exceed $5000 per dwelling unit.
2. The applicant shall notify adjacent property owners of the
program in writing, and provide the City with verification
of compliance with this mitigation measure prior to
construction permit issuance.
3. Prior to release of final occupancy by the City, the
Developer shall submit a monitoring report prepared by a
qualified professional which documents compliance with the
noise mitigation measures.
4. The Community Development Director may at any time modify,
add, or delete mitigation measures if the above mitigation
measures are determined to be ineffective or physically
infeasible. Such changes shall be limited to measures
which would meet the intent of the original mitigation.
SECTION 3. Final Architectural Approval. The City Council hereby
upholds the Architectural Review Commission's action granting final
approval to demolition of four structures and the construction of
two new office buildings as shown in architectural plans approved
on' February 1, .1993 and on file in the Community Development
Department.
On motion of Council Member Romero
seconded by Council Member Rappa , and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Council Members Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Settle
NOES: Mayor Pinard
ABSENT: None
Council Resolution No. 8137 (1993 Series)
Page 3
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this
of March , 1993.
l
May Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
PA, 204&1L � O ! G .�. ����
Gladwell; , i Clerk
APPROVED:
City
Community
nistrative officer
opment Director
2nd day
� � f4-7
kot. a1w. -16"Af
�AOOV Cy\ 31IV143
*0 A,AIS4 -
,�k � *qow�
RESOLUTION NO. 8136 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 2112
LOCATED AT 680 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this cuncil, after
conside tion of the tentative map of Tract-'-2112 and the Planning
Commission's ecommendations, staff recommendations, and reports
thereof, makes the ollowing fi�-i'dings:
1. The design of the s d'i<vision is not consistent with
neighborhood design / o i ies of the General Plan Land Use
Element.
2. The site is
of develop
3. The deli
env ir' nn
harz"ards .
of physically suited for the type and density
ent allowed in the R -4 zone `ice
of the subdivision may cause sig
al effects by increasing traffic
SECTION 2. Denial. The Council therefore resolves
the tentative map for proposed Tract 2112.
adverse
on and
deny
On motion of Council Member Roalman
seconded by Council Member Settle' and on ,
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Members Rappa and Romero
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day
of March , 1993.
Resolution No. 8136 (1993 Series)
Tract 2112
Page. 2 � �
Get
ATTEST:
Mayor &g Pinard
/
• A
Cis lerk Diarg Gladwell
APPROVED:
City Ad 'nistrative Officer
oIj
r
RESOLUTION NO. 8135 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING THE WATER & WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
BY ADDING A RELIABILITY RESERVE
The City .Council resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings.
A. The Planning Commission and the City Council have held public hearings on the
proposed amendment in accordance with the California Government Code; and
B. The amendment maintains general plan internal consistency and promotes the
public health, safety, and welfare.
SECTION 2. Environmental determination. The Council determines that the
proposed amendment is not a project for purposes of environmental review, since it has
no potential for physical environmental changes.
SECTION 3. Adoption. The general plan Water & Wastewater Management
Element is amended as fully contained in the attached Exhibit A (text) and Exhibit B
(illustration). The Community Development Director shall cause the change to be
reflected in the documents published by the city.
Mayor Council Member
On motion of Pinard seconded by Settle and on the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Mayor Pinard, Council Members Settle, Rappa, Roalman, and Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of March 1993.
Mayor Pey Pinard
ATTEST:
o'Ap, mor, 9 , z
r I 17AO I "RIA WIN MEMMON "I"
R -8135
Resolution No. 8135
Page 2
APPROVED:
r
City Ad inistrative Officer
(1993 Series)
LJ -►emsA
Community De Ipment Director An�c��
ities Director
GMAWTRELAES
EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT TO THE WATER & WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(GP 9 -93)
Proiected Water Reauiremen
Water demand is expressed as the number of acre -feet per year which the city should be
prepared to deliver for all desired uses. Based on historical water -use measurements,
the city assumes that water use will be 0.2 acre -foot per person per year. In other words,
one acre -foot will meet the needs of five city residents plus all nonresidential uses (such
as businesses, parks, and schools) if the relationship between resident population and
other uses remains about the same as in recent years. Using these assumptions, and
population projections derived from the Land Use Element, Figure 6 shows city water
needs to the year 2015. This figure includes an allowance of up to 150 acre -feet per year
for Cuesta College. It also reflects the additional water needed to compensate for
gradually reduced yield of existing reservoirs due to siltation.
If San Luis Obispo grows as outlined in the Land Use Element, the city will need about
12,000 acre -feet per year when the development capacity is fully used, about the year
2015 (about 4,300 acre -feet more than the 1993 safe yield). In pursuing supplemental
water supplies, the city will seek an additional 2,000 acre -feet, or a total increment of
about 6,300 acre -feet. This "reliability reserve" is intended to help meet any shortfall due
to an existing or proposed source not being able to deliver the anticipated amount of
water. The reserve also would cover unforeseen increases in the usage rates, on which
projections of future need are based. The reliability reserve will not be a basis for
planning additional development capacity. This reserve cannot be used other than as a
reserve, unless approved by a vote of the city electorate. The City Council will consider
the cost of obtaining this reserve before committing to any reserve project.
As Figure 6 shows, during the early 1990's; the city's safe yield of supplies is below
normal usage levels. At other times, the city may have more than enough water. The
actual dates when supplemental water will be available and the total quantities to be
available cannot be predicted with certainty. If supplemental water is not available or if
droughts occur, the city will have to manage water demand so requirements do not reach
the level projected in the graph.
GMAWTREL.LEG
EXHIBIT B
(A
w
of
a
CL
0
ds
1
a ,
L
En
En
Z
w
CY
i
W
LL
(Z'
F
LW
r
w
F-
W
a
EXHIBIT B
So
O
d
F
Q
z
a
a
c�
U
O
x
vi
Q
z
Q
1 C..
l�
t
J
m
ep
w
d is
7 v
C
C (n
c.
h W.
W a
rn
a a
a
J
0
N
0
0
N
v�
0
0
N
I
in
�S N O 00 �O et N
(l eaC /�aa } -aiae 0001)
S3I'Iddf1S QNd SlNallaxIfiba2d 2i3.L`dkk k-LID Q3.LJ3fo -dd
13
fs
Q
a ,
i
+
F
F
Q
'Z
z
O
�
I
Q
z
I
v
Z
k
I
1
Z
i
\
So
O
d
F
Q
z
a
a
c�
U
O
x
vi
Q
z
Q
1 C..
l�
t
J
m
ep
w
d is
7 v
C
C (n
c.
h W.
W a
rn
a a
a
J
0
N
0
0
N
v�
0
0
N
I
in
�S N O 00 �O et N
(l eaC /�aa } -aiae 0001)
S3I'Iddf1S QNd SlNallaxIfiba2d 2i3.L`dkk k-LID Q3.LJ3fo -dd
13
>v
-X V17)
�J
RESOLUTION NO. 8134 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL FROM THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO DENY APPLICATION NO. GP /R 14,54, A PROPOSAL TO AMEND
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION AND REZONE A PORTION OF
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 761 ORCUTT ROAD ( ORCUTT I REZONING) FROM
SERVICE COMMERCIAL /LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
WHEREAS, the Planning commission conducted a .public
hearing on application No. GP /R 1454 September 26, 1990, and denied
the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed that decision to the
City council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted public hearings
on November 7, 1991, February 5, 1991, and March 2, 1993, and has
considered the testimony and statements of the applicant, and other
interested parties, and the records of the Planning Commission
hearing and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, the council resolves to deny the appeal
and deny application No. GP /R 1454 based on the following findings:
SECTION 1. Findings
1. The proposed General Plan land use designation and zoning
classification are not compatible with the surrounding area.
2. There is a need to provide for growth of commercial
development within the city limits.
3. The proposed amendments do not follow the city's policy of
infill development of commercial and light - industrial
districts designated on the land use element map.
On motion of Council Member Roalman
seconded by Council Member Rappa
following roll call vote:
, and on the
R -8134
Resolution No. 8134(1993 Series)
Page 2
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Rappa and Romero
NOES: Council Member Settle and Mayor Pinard
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day
of March , 1993.
e�e-et
Mayor PegyPinard
ATTEST:
CinVClerk Diane Vadwell
APPROVED:
City A ministrative Officer
C �� . �� �
���'
�� �\6
RESOLUTION NO. 8133 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM UNDER THE INTERMODAL
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 FOR THE
HISTORIC RAILROAD WATER TOWER RESTORATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to provide over $200 million in
federal dollars over a 6 year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies
and non - profit entities for transportation enhancement activities, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation has established the procedures and
criteria for reviewing proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation
Commission a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will be selected; and
WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the California Department
of Transportation resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicants
governing body before submission of said application to the California Transportation
Commission and the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected,. will enter into an agreement with the State
of California to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California the following:
1. Approves the filing of an application for the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program for consideration of funding.
2. Estimates that the total cost of the project is $51,000. The City will commit to using
local fund to support a minimum of 12% of the total project cost.
3. Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo will make adequate provisions for the
operation and maintenance of the project.
4. Appoints John Dunn, City Administrative Officer as agent of the City of San Luis
Obispo to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including but
not limited to application, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on,
which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.
1 01 o0
I �I
Page 2 -- Resolution No. 8133 (1993 Series)
Uponmotionof council Member Settle ,secondedby Council Member Romero and
on the following roll call vote:.
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 2nd day of March, 1993
Mayor Feg Pinard
ATTEST
Diane la we 1, City Cl&k
APPROVED:
William Statler, rector of Finance
Mike McCluskey, Pub c Works Director
TS:ts
���� ���
`� . �`��
U �1V�� q �
��
RESOLUTION NO. 8132 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM UNDER THE INTERMODAL
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 FOR THE
DOWNTOWN BICYCLE PARKING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to provide over $200 million in
federal dollars over a 6 year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies
and non - profit entities for transportation enhancement activities, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation has established the procedures and
criteria for reviewing proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation
Commission a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will be selected; and
WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the California Department
of Transportation resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicants
governing body before submission of said application to the California Transportation
Commission and the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State
of California to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California the following:
1. Approves the filing of an application for the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program for consideration of funding.
2. Estimates that the total cost of the project is $30,000. The City will commit to using
local fund to support a minimum of 12% of the total project cost.
3. Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo will make adequate provisions for the
operation and maintenance of the project.
4. Appoints John Dunn, City Administrative Officer as agent of the City of San Luis
Obispo to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including but
not limited to application, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on,
which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.
R -8132
Page 2 — Resolution No. 8132 (1993 Series)
Uponmotionof Council Member Settle, secondedby Council Member Romero and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 2nd day of March, 1993
Mayo (/Peg Pinard
ATTEST
-D!/' _ . /ladwell, City Cleo
APPROVED:
TS:ts
�� 31
0
i
RESOLUTION NO. 8131 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM UNDER THE INTERMODAL
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 FOR THE
RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to provide over $200 million in
federal dollars over a 6 year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies
and non - profit entities for transportation enhancement activities, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation has established the procedures and
criteria for reviewing proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation
Commission a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will be selected; and
WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the California Department
of Transportation resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicants
governing body before submission of said application to the California Transportation
Commission and the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State
of California to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project.
NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California the following:
1. Approves the filing of an application for the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program for consideration of funding.
2. Estimates that the total cost of the project is $131,000. The City will commit to using
local fund to support a minimum of 12% of the total project cost.
3. Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo will make adequate provisions for the
operation and maintenance of the project.
4. Appoints John Dunn, City Administrative Officer as agent of the City of San Luis
Obispo to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including but
not limited to application, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on,
which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.
R -8131
Page 2 -- Resolution No. 8131 (1993 Series):
Uponmotionof Council Member Settle ,secondedby Council Member Romero and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 2nd day of March, 1993
yor Peg Pinard
ATTEST
Di
APPROVED:
John D ►nn, City Administrative Officer
J
William Qtntler hlrfctnr of Finance
TS:ts
���� �
���� ���q
c _ ,,
�l ���M �����
lJ ��
I
RESOLUTION NO. 8130 (1993 Series).
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM UNDER THE INTERMODAL
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 FOR THE
PHASE I RAILROAD BICYCLE PATH
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to provide over $200 million in
federal dollars over a 6 year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies
and non -profit entities for transportation enhancement activities, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation has established the procedures and
criteria for reviewing proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation
Commission a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will be selected; and
WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the California Department
of Transportation resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicants
governing body before submission of said application to the California Transportation
Commission and the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State
of California to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo, California the following:
1. .Approves the filing of an application for the Transportation Enhancement Activities
Program for consideration of funding.
2. Estimates that the total cost of the project is $616,000. The City will commit to using
local fund to support a minimum of 12% of the total project cost.
3. Certifies that the City of San Luis Obispo will make adequate provisions for the
operation and maintenance of the project.
4. Appoints John Dunn, City Administrative Officer as agent of the City of San Luis
Obispo to conduct all negotiations; execute and submit all documents, including but
not limited to application, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on,
which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.
R -8130
Page 2 -- Resolution No. 8130 (1993 Series)
Uponmotionof Council Member Set tlg seconded by Council Member Romero and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 2nd day of March, 1993
PP
ATTEST
1�2 In
i 1 L�
Dia a Gladwe 1, City CAerk
APPROVED:
John nn, City Administrative Officer
TS:ts
�'���L� �� � ���
i
�V
Cj
0
RESOLUTIONNO. 8129 (1993 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT TO EXCEED $11,500,000
REVENUE BONDS AND AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the Ciry of San,Luis Obispo (the "City ") is authorized pursuant to Section 203
of the City Charter of the City to make and enforce all laws and regulations in respect to municipal
affairs, subject only to such restrictions and limitations as may be provided therein and in the
Constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to such authorization the City Council of the City proposes to
authorize proceedings for the issuance of 1993 Water Revenue Bonds of the City in the aggregate
principal amount of not to exceed $11,500,000 (the 'Bonds ") for the purpose of financing the
improvement of the existing water treatment plant which is used in connection with the water
treatment and distribution enterprise of the City (the "Enterprise "); and
WHEREAS, the City and the City of San Luis Obispo Capital Improvement Board have
previously entered into that certain Lease Agreement dated as of December 1, 1988, whereby the
City has incurred certain lease obligations which are payable from the net revenues of the
Enterprise (the "1988 Lease Payments "), and the Bonds are proposed to be issued on a parity with
the 1988 Lease Payments; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes at this time to authorize the issuance of the Bonds and
authorize and direct the public sale thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Adoption of City of San Luis Obispo Revenue Bond Law . Pursuant to the
municipal affairs powers of the City which are granted to it by -the City Charter -of the City and by
the Constitution of the State of California, the City Council does hereby enact municipal. legislation
to be known as the "City of San Luis Obispo Revenue Bond Law" (the "Law ") which shall consist
of all of the provisions (which provisions are herein incorporated by reference with the same force
and effect as if such provision were expressly set forth herein) of the Revenue Bond Law of 1941,
cons-ti ting Chapter 6 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of
California, excluding therefrom: the provisions of Article 3 of said Chapter 6 (consisting of
Sections 54380 through 54388, inclusive), as such provisions are in effect on the date of adoption
hereof or as they may thereafter by amended. The enactment of the Law pursuant hereto shall
constitute a law made by the City in respect of municipal affairs, within the meaning of Section 203
of the City Charter of the City.
SECTION 2. Issuance of Bonds: Approval of Documents. The City Council hereby
authorizes the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the Law in theaggregate principal amount of not
to exceed $11,500,000. The Bonds shall be issued under and in accordance with the Indenture of
Trust dated as of April 1, 1993, by and between the City and Bank of America National Trust and
Savings Association, as trustee, in substantially the form on file with the City Administrative
Officer together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the City
Administrative Officer, whose execution thereof shall be conclusive evidence of his approval of
such changes and additions. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City
R -8129
Resolution No. 811, (1993 Series)
Page 2
Administrative Officer to execute, and the City Clerk to attest and affix the seal of the City to, said
form of the Indenture of Trust for and in the name of the City.
SECTION 3. Call for Bids: Authorization of Competitive Sale of Bonds.' The City hereby
calls for bids to be received for the purchase of the Bonds at the offices of Jones Hall Hill &
White, A Professional Law Corporation, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1950, San Francisco,
California 94111, on Wednesday, March 17,19 93 at 10:00 a.m. California time. Bids shall be
received, and the Bonds shall be sold, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Official
Notice of Sale of the Bonds in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this
reference incorporated herein, together with any additions thereto or changes therein (including but
not limited to changes in the time and date fixed for sale of the Bonds) as may be deemed necessary
or advisable by the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed
to accept the best bid determined in accordance with the Official Notice of Sale, in the name and on
behalf of the City.
SECTION 4. Publication of Notices. Pursuant to Section 53692 of the Government
Code, the Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed to execute, and Jones Hall Hill &
White, A Professional Law Corporation, is hereby authorized to cause to be published, the Notice
of intention to Sell Bonds in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and by this
reference incorporated herein, together with any additions thereto or changes therein (including but
not limited to changes in the time and date fixed for sale of the Bonds) as may be deemed necessary
or advisable by the Director of Finance. Such publication shall be made once in The Bond Buyer,
not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the receipt of bids for the sale of the Bonds.
The financial advisor is herebyAuthorized and directed to cause to be circulated to potential bidders
a copy of the final form of the Official Notice of Sale.
SECTION 5. Official Statement. The City hereby approves, and hereby deems nearly
final within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the preliminary
Official Statement describing the Bonds, in the form on file with the Director of Finance. The
financial advisor is hereby authorized to distribute the Official Statement in connection with the sale
of the Bonds. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed to (a) execute and deliver
to the purchaser of the Bonds a certificate deeming the preliminary Official Statement to be nearly
final as of its date, (b) approve any changes in or additions to cause such Official Statement to be
put in final form, and (c) execute said final Official Statement for and in the name and on behalf of
the City.
SECTION 6. Engagement of Professional Services. Evensen Dodge, Inc. is hereby
retained as financial advisor to the City, and the firm of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional
Law Corporation, is hereby retained as bond counsel to the City, in connection with the issuance
and sale of the Bonds. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the
City to execute an agreement with each of said firms, in the respective forms on file with the
Director of Finance.
SECTION 7. Official Actions. The City Administrative Officer, the Director of Finance,
the City Clerk, the City Attorney and all other officers of the City are each authorized and directed
in the name and on behalf of the City to make any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions,
agreements, notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents, which
they or any of them might deem necessary or appropriate in order to consummate any of the
transactions contemplated by the documents approved pursuant to this Resolution. Whenever in
this resolution any officer of the City is authorized to execute or countersign any document or take
any action, such execution, countersigning or action may be taken on behalf of such officer by any
person designated by such officer to act on his or her behalf in the case such officer shall be absent
or unavailable. '
-2-
Resolution No. 8129=-0993 Series)
Page 3
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect from and after the date of
approval and adoption thereof.
Council Member Settle Council Member Romero
On motion of ,seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day of March, 1993.
Mayor Peg "Pi ;ard
ATTEST:
Oi ' QYefk Diand Gladw -A
APPROVED:
-3-
EXHIBTI' A
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
1993 WATER REVENUE BONDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City of San Luis Obispo (the "City`') that bids will
be received by a representative of the City at the offices of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional
Law Corporation, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1950, San Francisco, California 94111, on
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 1993
at 10:00 a.m. California Time for the purchase of $ - - - principal amount of bonds of the
City designated the "City of San Luis Obispo 1993 Water Revenue Bonds" (the "Bonds "). The
Bonds will be issued under the provisions of an Indenture of Trust by and between the City and
Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association as Trustee (the "Trustee ") dated as of
April 1, 1993 (the "Indenture "), and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The Bonds are
more particularly described in the proposed form of the Indenture on file with the City Clerk of the
City (which is incorporated herein by reference) and copies thereof will be furnished to the bidder
upon request.
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
FORM OF BONDS: The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form in denominations
of $5,000 or authorized integral multiples thereof, to be dated initially as of April 1, 1993. The
Bonds will be issued initially under the book -entry system of The Depository Trust Company of
New York, New York. ( "DTC" ), and the ownership of the Bonds will be registered to the nominee
of DTC.. Bidders are referred to the Official Statement for further details.
MATURITIES :. The Bonds will mature, or be subject to mandatory sinking fund
redemption, on June 1 in each of the years and in the amounts, as set forth in the following table.
Each bidder is required to specify in its bid whether, for any particular year, the Bonds will mature
or, alternately,. be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in such year..
Year Principal Year Principal
June ] Amount June 1 Amount
Em
PAYMENT PROVISIONS: Interest on the Bonds will be payable on December 1, 1993,
and on June 1 and December 1 in each year thereafter (the "Interest Payment Dates "), to the
registered owners by check or draft of the Trustee or, in the case of the owner of Bonds in an
aggregate principal amount of at least $1,000,000, at the written request of such owner by wire
transfer. Principal of any Bond will be paid upon presentation and surrender thereof at the
corporate'trust office of the Trustee in Los Angeles, California. Both the principal of and interest
on the Bonds are payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION: The Bonds maturing on or before June 1, 2003, are not
subject to optional redemption prior to maturity. The Bonds maturing on or after June 1, 2004, are
subject to redemption prior to their respective maturity dates, at the option of the City, as a whole
or in part, from any source of available funds, on any date on or after June 1, 2003, at a
redemption price equal to the one hundred percent (100 %) of the principal amount of the Bonds to
be redeemed plus accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption, without premium.
SPECIAL MANDATORY REDEMPTION. The Bonds are also subject to redemption as
a whole or in part, on any Interest Payment Date, from and to the extent of the proceeds of
disposition of properties of the City's water enterprise (the "Enterprise ") or the proceeds of hazard
insurance not used to repair or rebuild the Enterprise, which proceeds are required to be used for
such purpose pursuant to the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the
Bonds plus interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without premium.
The Bonds are also subject to redemption as a whole or in pan, on the first Interest
Payment Date (commencing June 1, 1996) for which notice of redemption can be timely given
following the transfer of funds from the Construction Fund to the Redemption Fund pursuant to
the Indenture, from and to the extent of the funds so transferred, at a redemption price equal to the
principal amount of the Bonds plus interest accrued. thereon to the date fixed for redemption,
without premium.
SINKING FUND REDEMPTION. Any bidder may, at its option; specify that one or more
maturities of the Bonds will consist of term Bonds which are subject to mandatory sinking fund
redemption in consecutive.years immediately preceding the maturity thereof, as designated in the
bid of such bidder. In the event that the bid of the successful bidder specifies that any maturity of
Bonds will be term Bonds, such term Bonds will be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption
on June 1 in each year so designated in the bid, in the respective amounts for such years as set
forth above under the heading "MATURITIES ", at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount thereof to be redeemed together with accrued interest thereon to the redemption date,
without premium.
PURPOSE: The proceeds of the Bonds will be applied by the City to finance the
construction of improvements to the existing water treatment plant of the City, together with the
acquisition, construction and improvement of other facilities and property in connection with the
Enterprise.
SECURITY: The Bonds are special obligations of the City, payable solely from and
secured by a lien on and pledge of the Net Revenues of the water treatment and distribution
enterprise of the City, which Net Revenues are pledged therefor in the Indenture. The Bonds are
additionally secured by a lien on amounts held in the funds and accounts established under the
Indenture. The Bonds will be issued on a parity with the obligations of the City under a Lease
Agreement previously entered into by the City in the aggregate original principal amount of
$5,000,000. Bidders should be aware of certain factors affecting the availability and amount.of the
Net Revenues in amounts and at times sufficient to pay the Bonds, and the bidders are referred to
the Indenture and the Official Statement for further details.
A -2
i
TAX- EXEMPT STATUS: In the opinion of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law
Corporation, bond counsel to the City, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for
federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal
individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes, although it is included in certain income and
earnings in computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations. In the further
opinion of Bond Counsel, such interest is exempt from California personal income taxes. In the
event that prior to the delivery of the Bonds (a) the interest on other obligations of the same type
and character shall be declared to be taxable (either at the time of such declaration or at any future
date) under any federal income tax laws, either by the terms of such laws or by ruling of a federal
income tax authority or official which is followed by the Internal Revenue Service, or by decision
of any federal court, or (b) any federal income tax law is adopted which will have a substantial
adverse effect upon owners of the Bonds as such, the successful bidder for the Bonds may, at its
option, prior to the tender of the Bonds, be relieved of its obligation under the contract to purchase
the Bonds, and in such case the deposit accompanying its proposal will be returned.
LEGAL OPINION: The legal opinion of Jones Hall Hill & White, A Professional Law
Corporation, San Francisco, California, approving the validity of the Bonds and the Indenture,
will be furnished to the purchaser of the Bonds without cost A copy of the legal opinion, certified
by the official in whose office the original is filed, will be printed on each Bond at the expense of
the City.
FURTHER INFORMATION: A copy of the preliminary Official Statement describing the
Bonds, and any other information concerning the proposed financing, will be furnished upon
request to the financial consultant to the City, Evensen Dodge, Inc., 650 Town Center Drive,
Costa Mesa, California 92626, telephone: (714) 545 -2675.
TERMS OF SALE
FORM OF BID; MAXIMUM DISCOUNT: Each bid must be for not less than all of the
Bonds hereby offered for sale. The purchase price to be paid for the Bonds may not be less than
ninery-eight percent (98 %) of the par value thereof and accrued interest thereon to the delivery date..
The amount of any discount specified for the Bonds shall not exceed two percent (2 %) of the
aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. Each bid must be delivered in writing to the City at the
address set forth above, to be received not later than the date and time of sale set forth above.
DESIGNATION OF INTEREST RATES: Each bidder must specify the rate or rates of
interest which the Bonds shall bear. The maximum rate bid on any maturity of the Bonds may not
exceed percent ` %) per annum. A bidder will be permitted to bid different rates of
interest for each maturity of Bonds; but (i) each interest rate specified must be in a multiple of one-
twentieth or one -eighth of one percent; (ii) the rate of interest bid on any maturity of Bonds must be
greater than or equal to rate of interest bid on the preceding maturity of Bonds; (iii) no Bond shall
bear more than one rate of interest; (iv) interest on each Bond shall be computed from April 1,
1993, to its stated maturity (or, in the case of term Bonds, to the all
dates of mandatory
sinldng fund redemption thereof as designated in the bid) at the interest rate specified in the bid,
payable on the Interest Payment Dates as set forth above; (v) all Bonds maturing at any one time
shall bear the same rate of interest; and (vi) any premium must be paid as part of the purchase
price, and no proposal will be accepted which contemplates the waiver of any interest or other
concession by the bidder as a substitute for payment in full of the purchase price.
BOND INSURANCE: The City has applied for the issuance of a policy of municipal
bond insurance on the Bonds. Information concerning such municipal bond insurance will be
available prior to the time set for receipt of bids, and bidders should contact the financial consultant
to the City, Evensen Dodge, Inc.; 650 Town Center Drive, Costa Mesa, California 92626,
A -3
telephone: (714) 545 -2675, for further information. The premium for any such insurance will be
paid by the City.
DETERMINATION OF BEST BID: The best bid will be determined by deducting the
amount of the premium bid (if any) from, and adding the amount of the discount bid (if any) to, the
total amount of interest which would be required to be paid on the Bonds from April 1, 1993, to
their respective maturity dates, or in the case of the Term Bonds to their respective sinking account
prepayment dates set forth above, at the respective interest rates specified in the, on the basis of
the lowest net interest cost determined thereby, The purchaser must pay accrued interest,
computed on a 30 -day month, 360 -day year basis, from April 1, 1993, to the date of delivery.
RIGHT TO REJECT ANY BID: The City reserves the right; in its discretion, to reject
any and all proposals and to waive any irregularity or informality in any proposal.:
TIME OF AWARD: The City has authorized its Director of Finance to award the sale of
the Bonds to the bidder whose proposal is the best responsible proposal determined in accordance
herewith. Notice of the award will be given in writing to the successful bidder within twenty-four
(24) hours from the time proposals are received.
DELIVERY AND PAYMENT: Delivery of the definitive Bonds will be made to DTC or
its nominee upon the issuance thereof, which is expected to occur on April _, 1993. Payment
for the Bonds must be made by wire transfer of Federal Reserve Bank funds, or Federal Reserve
Bank funds check, which is immediately available to the Trustee on the date of delivery. Any
expense in providing immediately available funds shall be borne by the purchaser.
RIGHT OF CANCELLATION: The purchaser shall have the right, at its option, to cancel
the contract of purchase if the City fails to execute the Bonds and tender the same for delivery
within 60 days from the date of award thereof, and in such event the accompanying good faith
deposit will be returned.
GOOD FAITH DEPOSIT: A certified or cashier's check drawn on a responsible bank or
trust company having an office in Los Angeles, California, or in San Francisco, California, in the
amount of $ , payable to the order of the City, must accompany each proposal as a
guaranty that the bidder, if successful, will accept and pay for the Bonds in accordance with the
terms of its proposal. The good faith deposit accompanying any accepted proposal will be cashed
by the City following the award to the successful bidder. The amount will be applied as a credit
towards the payment of the purchase price by the successful bidder. If after the award of the
Bonds, the successful bidder fails to complete its purchase on the terms stated in its proposal, the
full amount of the good faith deposit will be retained by the City.
The check accompanying unaccepted proposals will be made available for recovery by each
unsuccessful bidder as soon as the successful bid has been verified. No interest will be paid upon
any good faith check held or deposited by the City.
STATEMENT OF NET INTEREST COST: Each bidder is requested, but not required,
to state in its bid the total net interest cost and the percentage net interest rate represented by the bid,
which will be informative only and not binding on either the bidder, or the City.
CERTIFICATION OF REOFFERING PRICE: The successful bidder shall be required,
as a condition to the delivery of the Bonds by the City, to deliver to the City a certificate, in form
and substance satisfactory to the City, stating (i) that, as of the date of award, the Bonds were
expected to be reoffered in a bona fide public offering, (ii) the initial offering price at which a
substantial amount (at least 10 %) of each maturity of the Bonds were sold to the public, and (iii)
A-4
that no Bonds of a single maturity were offered at one price to the general public and at a discount
from that price to institutional or other investors.
No LITIGATION: There is no litigation pending concerning the validity of the Bonds, the
corporate existence of the City, or the entitlement of the officers thereof to their respective offices,
and the purchaser will be furnished a no-litigation certificate certifying to the foregoing as of and at
the time of delivery of the Bonds,
CUSIP NUMBERS: It is anticipated that CUSIP numbers will be printed on the Bonds,
but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bonds nor any error with respect thereto will
constitute cause for a.failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds
in accordance with the terms hereof. All expenses in relation to the printing of CUSIP numbers on
the Bonds will be paid for by the City; provided, however, that the CUSIP Service Bureau charge
for the assignment of said numbers will be the responsibility of and shall be paid for by the
purchaser.
CALIFORNIA DEBT ADVISORY COMMISSION FEES: All fees payable to the
California Debt Advisory Commission in connection with the issuance of the Bonds shall be the
responsibility of the purchaser of the Bonds.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT: The City has approved a preliminary Official Statement
relating to the Bonds. Copies of such preliminary Official Statement will be distributed to any
bidder, upon request, prior to the sale in a form "deemed final' by the City for purposes of Rule
15c2 =12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 'Rule "). Within seven business days
from the sale date, the City will deliver to the purchaser copies of the final Official Statement (in an
amount not to exceed 250 copies), executed by an authorized representative of the City and dated
the date of delivery thereof to the purchaser -, in. sufficient number to allow the purchaser to comply
with paragraph (b)(4) of the Rule and to satisfy the Municipal Securities Rule malting Board (the
"MSRB ") Rule G -32 or any other rules adopted by the MSRB, which shall include information
permitted to be omitted by paragraph (b)(1) of the Rule and such other amendments or supplements
as shall have been approved by the City (the "Final Official Statement" ). The purchaser agrees that
it will not confirm the sale of any Bonds unless the confirmation of sale is accompanied or
preceded by the delivery of a copy of the Final Official Statement.
Dated: March _, 1993
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
A -5
/i //
Director of Financ-e
EXHIBIT B
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL BONDS
CI'T'Y OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
1993 WATER REVENUE BONDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City of San Luis Obispo (the "City") that bids will
be received by a representative of the City at the offices of Jones Nall Hill & White, A Professional_
Law Corporation, Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1950, San Francisco, California 94111, on
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 179 1993
at 10:00 a.m. California Time for the purchase of $ principal amount of bonds of the
City designated the "City of San Luis Obispo 1993 Water Revenue Bonds" (the "Bonds "). The
sale of the Bonds will be conducted upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Official Notice
of Sale for the Bonds. Such Official Notice of Sale and the preliminary form of the Official
Statement describing the Bonds may be obtained from the financial adviser to the City, Evensen
Dodge, Inc., 650 Town Center Drive, Costa Mesa, California 92626, telephone: (714) 545 -2675.
Dated: March _, 1993
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
By: J'�IE44
Director of Finance
SCHEDULE 1
i
SUMMARY OF PROP06ED WATER TREATMENT PLANT kINANCING
■ Policy Links 1991 -93 Financial Plan
Recent Council Actions:
Approved Water Treatment Project (9/22/92)
Awarded Construction Contract (1/5/93)
■ Bond Sizing /Use of Proceeds
Project costs
$ 9,855,700
Debt service reserve
793,200
Underwriter's discount
92,800
Fixed costs of issuance
100,000
Variable costs of issuance
65,500
Bond insurance
143,000
Interest earnings during construction
(130,200)
Total Proceeds .
$10,920,000
5% Contingency
580.000
Issue not to exceed
$11,500,000
■ Project Cost Summary
Project inspection and management $ 750,000
Construction Contract 8,5109000
Contingencies 595.700
Total Estimated Project Costs $ 9,855,700
Note: The bond documents will allow reimbursement of design and study costs
(estimated at $760,000); however, they are not included in the recommended sizing
of the issue.
■ Type of Debt Instrument
■ Issued Through
■ Maturity Period
■ Estimated Interest Rate
■ Estimated Annual Debt Service
Gross debt service
Net debt service after interest on reserve
Net debt service after interest on reserve
and including final year payment made
from reserve
■ Source of Funding
■ Scheduled Key Events
Council approval of the financing
Underwriter bid closing
Receipt of proceeds
Water Revenue Bonds
City of San Luis Obispo
30 Years
6.0% to 6.5%
$793,000
$755,000
$725,000
Water Revenues
March 2, 1993
March 17, 1993
April 1, 1993
SCHEDULE 2a
Water Revenue Bonds
The City of Ban Luis 0blppo, California
Assumes DH 96; Bond Insurance at 60 We and U/N Disc of 58.50
■ �ar�ssasao ■tseaa�ssssasausar ■ ■sasssas
30U.ICE8 AND U8E3 OF FU102
' ssaasssaaasa ... ■■amaaaa---- �-- �se�sea:�asas
DELIVERY DATE: 3/30193
sources of Funds
asap ■ ■.o ■®ia
Par Amount of Bonds ................... $1019201000.00
Oremlua /-Dleoount ................... $0.00
Bond Proceeds . .......... .................tot........... 10,920.000.00
Accrued Interest ............... ...t .................... . 90,927.63
$10,970,927.63
Uses of Funds
Estimated Desipn/Msnaysmant Cost .......................:
7600000.00
UndsnOlter6, Discount ..................( 0.850000X)...
92,820.00
Fixed Costs of Issuance .......... ..toot ................
100,000.00
variable Coats of laseuancet. ........... ( 0.600000X)...
69,520.00
Bond IMwr'w n....r .....................( 0.60D000%)...
1420956.34
Accrued interest ......... ....040.1......................
50,927.45
Cebt.Service Reserve ..... ..................toot.........
793,160.00
Mat Construction Fund nt .... lot, ....................
Ameu
8,965.442.71st
Contingenc y .............. ...............................
- -------------------
80.95
S10,970,927.63
Prepared by Evawn Dodse, Inc.
RUNDATE: 02.04.1993 0 14:46 :42 FILENAME: $LO KEYr WATER2 -3A
,* e5kc.4.F,roc
SCHEDULE 2b
Prepared by Evanaan Doge, Inc.
RUNDATE: 02 -04 -1993 8 14:46:54 FILENAME: SLO KEY. WATER2 -3A
Water Revenue Bonds
-The
City of San Luis Obispo, Californts
Assumes DR 96;
Bond Insursnos
at 60 BPS and U/W Disc of
58.50
mm am =ice 223muY
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
DATE
PRINCIPAL
. COUPON
INTEREST
PERIOD TOTAL
FISCAL TOTAL
........
12/ 1/93
.............. .......... ......................
4740153.75
_.....---__
474,153.75
..............
6/ 1/94
160;000.00
2.900000
3161102.50
476,162.50
950,256.25
12/ 1/94
313,78230
313,782.50
6/ 1/95
165,000.00
3.700000
3131182.50
4781782.50
792,565.00
12/ 1/95
310,730.00
310,730.00
6/ 1/96
170,000.00
4.200000
310,750.00
480,730.00
791,460.00
12/ 1/06
301,160.00
307,160.00
6/ 1197
175,000.00
4.650000
307,160.00
482,160.00
789,320.00
12/ 1/97
303,266.25
303,266.25
6/ 1/98
185,000.00
4.700000
303,266.25
4881266.25
791,532.50
12/ 1/98
298,916.75
298,918.75
6/ 1/99
195,000.00
4.850000
298,918.75
49!,918.75
792,837.50
12/ 1/99
294,190.00
294,190.00
6/ 1/ 0
200,000.00
5.000000
294,190.00
494,190.00
788,380.00
12/ 1/ 0
289,190.00
289,190.00
6/ 1/ 1
210,000.00
5.150000
2890190.00
499,190.00
7880380.00
12/ 1/ 1
283,782.50
283,782.50
61 1/ 2
225,000.00
5.250000
283,782.50
508,782.50
7921565.00
12/ 1/ 2
277,876.25
277,876.25
6/ 1/ 3
235,000.00
5.350000
277,876.25
512,876.25
790,752.50
12/ 1/ 3
271,590.00
2718590.00
6/ 1/ 4
2500000.00
5.500000
271,590.00
521,590.00
793,180.00
12/ 1/ 4
264,715.00
264,715.00
6/ 1/ 5
260,000.00
5.600000
264,715.00
524,713.00
789,430.00
12/ 1/ 5
257,435.00
2570435.00
6/ 1/ 6
275,000.00
5.700000
2570435.00
532,435.00
7898870.00
12/'1/ 6
249,597.50
249,597.50
6/ 1/ 7
290,000.00
5.800000
249,597.50
539,597.50
789,193.00
12/ 1/ 7
241,187.50
241,187.50
6/ 1/ 8
310,000.00
5.850000
241,187.50
551,187.50
792,375.00
12/ 1/ 6
232,120.00
232,120.00
6/ 1/ 9
323,000.00
5.900000
232,126.00
557,120.60
789,240.00
12/ 1/ 9
222,532.50
2220532.50
6/ 1/10
345,000.00
5.950000
222,532.50
567,532.50
790,065.00
12/ 1/10
212,268.75
212,268.75
6/ 1111
365,000.00
6.000000
212,268.75
5171268.75
789,537.50
12/ 1/11
201,318.75
201,318.75
6/ 1/12
390,000.00
6.050000
201,318.75
$911318.75
792,537.30
12/ 1/12
189,521.25
189,521.25
6/ 1/13
410,000.00
6.050000
189,521.25
5990521.25
789,042.50
121 1/13
177,118.75
1770118.75
6/ 1/14
435,000.00
6.100000
177,118.75
612,118.75
789,237.50
12/ 1/14
163,851.25
163,851.25
6/ 1/13
465,000.00
6.100000
163,851.25
62A,851.25
792,702.50
12/ 1/15
149,668.75
149,660.75
6/ 1/16
490,000.00
6.100000
149,668.75
639,668.75
789,337.50
12/ 1/16
134,723.75
134,723.75
6/ 1/17
520,000.00
6.100000
134,723.75
654,723.75
789,447.50
1L 1/17
118,86335
118,863.75
6/ 1/18
5551000.00
6.100000
118,663.75
673,863.75
792,727.50
12/ 1/16
101,936.25
101,936.25
6/ 1/19
585,000.00
6.150000
101,936.25
666,936.25
788,87230
12/ 1/19
83,947.50
83,947.50
6/ 1/20
625,000.00
6.150000
83,947.50
708,947.50
792,895.00
12/ 1/20
64,728.75
64,728.75
6/ 1/21
660,000.00
6.150000
64,728.75
724,728.75
789,457.50
12/ 1/21
44,433.75
44,433.75
6/ 1/22
700,000.00
6.150000
441433.75
744,433.75
788,867.50
12/ 1/22
22,908.75
22,908.75
61 1/23
745,000.00
6.150000
22,908.75
767,908.75
790,817.50
Prepared by Evanaan Doge, Inc.
RUNDATE: 02 -04 -1993 8 14:46:54 FILENAME: SLO KEY. WATER2 -3A
Water Revenue Bonds
n SCHEDULE 2c
'The City of San Luis Obispo, California
Assumes DH %; Bond Insurance at 60 BPs and UN Diac of $9.50
-- a= sa■■■w■..snmm"
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
■p�oa+ ■p�SS�3Qwr■
DATE PRINCIPAL COUPON INTEREST PERIOD TOTAL' FISCAL TOTAL
.............. .......... .............. .............. .......
.._._
.. ........ ..a...........
10,920,000.00 18,996,983.75 23,876,983.75
ACCRUED 50,927.63 50,9Z7.63
10,920,000.00 124906,056.12 23,826,056.12
rwwm.■■■a ■ ■ ■w■■w■■e 820D= = == ■■■w
Dated 3/ 1/93 with DeLlvery of 3/30/93
Bond Years 215,585.000
Average Coupon 6.010151
Average Life 19.742216
N I C % 6.053206 % Using 99.1500000
Bond Insurance:
0.600000 % of (Total D/S - Accrued • Cap. Int.) 142,956.36
Prepared by Evensen Dedga, Inc.
RU90ATE: 02.04.1993 A 14:46:57 FILENAME: OLD KET: wATER2 -3A
Prepered by Evensen Dodge, Inc.
RUNDATE: 02 -16 -1993 S 12:33:48 FILENAME: SLO KEY: UATE42 -3A
Peter Revenue Bends
SCHEDULE 2d
""he City of Son Luis Obispo, Celifornis
DOM Insurance 60 Bps and UN Dine o1 )50
Assumes
D� ,
at
NET
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
cci
a CCte�feeee:azv/Qavaiia//a
DELIVERY DATE: 3/3D/93
PERIOD
TOTAL CONSTR. FUND DEBT SVC. RES.
NET SURPLUS FUNDS
ENDING
PRINCIPAL
COUPON
INTEREST
DEBT SERVICE EA�ININGS +
CAP. INT.
DEBT SERVICE REMAINING
.............
.............. ...
.. ....... .. °---................----
12/ 1/93
6/ 1194
..
160,000.00
.......
2.900000
474,153.75
316,102.50
474,153.75
476,102.50
77,477.13
19,829.50
396,676.62
456,273.00
12/ 1/94
313,782.50.
313,782.50
19,829.SO
293,953.00
61 1/95
165,000.00
3.700000
313,782.50
3i0,730.00
478,782.50
310,730.00
19,829.50
19,829.50
458,953.00
290,900.50
12/ 1/95
6/ 1/96
170,000.00
4,200000
310,730.00
480,730.00
19,829.50
460,90.0.50
12/ 1/96
307,160.00
307,160.00
19,829.50
287,330.50
61 1/97
175,000.00
4.450000
301,160.00
303,266.25
482,160,00
303,266.25
19,829.50
19,829.50
462,330.50
283,436.75
12/ 1/97
6/ 1/98
185,000.00
4.700000
303,266.25
•4880266.25
19,829.50
468,4305
12/ 1/98
298,918.75
298,918.75
19,829.50
279,089.25
6/ 1/99
195,000.00
4.850000
208,918.75
294,100.00
493,918,75
294,190.00
19,829 SO
19,829.50
474,089.25
274,360.50
12/ 1/99
6/ 1/ 0
200,00040
5.000000
204,190.00
494,190.00
190829.50
474,360.50
12/ 1/ 0
289,190.00
289,190.00
19,829.50
269,36D.50
6/ 11 1
210,000.00
5.150000
289,190.00
499,190.00
19,829.50
479,360.50
12/ 1/ 1
283,782.50
283,782.50
19,829.50
263,953.00
6/ 1/ 2
225,000.00
5.250000
- 283,782.50
508,782.50
19,829.50
488,953.00
12/ 1/ 2
277,876.25
277,876.25
19,829.50
258,046.75
6/ 1/ 3
235,000.00
5.350000
277,876.25
271,590.00
512,876.25
271,590.00
19,82930
19,829.50
493,046.75
251,760.50
12/ 1/ 3
6/ 1/ 4
250,000.00
5.500000
271,590.00
521,590.00
19,829.50
501,760.50
12/ 1/ 4
264,715.00
264,715.00
19,829.50
244,885.50
6/ 1/ 5
260,000.00
5.600000
264,715.00
257,.00
635
524,715.00
257;435.00.
19,829.50
19,829.50
504,885.50
237,605.50
12/ 1/ 5
6/ 1/ 6
275,000.00
5.700000
257,435.00
432,435.00
19,829.50
512,605.50
12/ 11 6
249,597.50
249,597.50
19,829.50
229,768.00
6/ 1/ 7
290,000.00
5.800000
249,597.50
241,187.SO
539,597.50
241,187.50
19,829.50
19,829.50
519,768.00
221,358.00
12/ 1/ 7
6/ 1/ 8
31C,000.OD
5.850000
241,187.50
551,187.50
19,829.50
531,358.00
121 11 8
232,120.00
232,120.00
19,829.50
212,290.50
6/ 1/ 9
325,000.00
5.900600
232,120.00
222,532.50
557,120.00
222,532.50
19,829.50
19,829.50
537,290.50
202,703.60
12/ 1/ 9
6/ 1/10
345,000.00
5.950000
222,S32.50
5670532.50
19,829.5D
547,703.00
in 1/10
212,266.75
212,268.75
19,829.50
192,439.25
6/ 1/11
365,000.00
6.000000
212,268.75
201,318.75
577,268.75
201,318.75
19,829.50
19,829.50
557,439.25
181,489.25
121 1/11
61 1/12
390,000.00
6.050000
201,318.75
591,318.75
19,829.50
571.489.25
12/ 1/12
189,521.25
189,521.25
19,829.50
169,691.75
6/ 1/13
410,000.00
6.050000
189,521.25
599,521.25
19,629.50
579,691.75
12/ 1/13
177,118.75
177,116.75
19,829.50
157,289.25
6/ 1/14
435,000.00
6.100000
177,118.75
163,851.25
612,118.75
163,651.2S
19,829.50
19,829.50
592,289.25
144,021.75
12/ 1/14
6/ 1/15
465,000.00
6.100000
163,851.25
628,851.25
190829.50
609,021.75
12/ 1/15
149,668.75
149,668.75
19,829.50
129,839.25
61 1/16
490,000.00
6.100000
149,666.75
639,668.75
10,829.50
6i9,839.25
12/ 1116
134,723.75
134,723.75
19,829.50
114,894.25
6/ 1/17
.520,000.00
6.100000
134,723.75
118,863.75
654,723.75
118,863.75
19,829.50
19,829.50
634,894.25
99,034.25
12/ 1/17
6/ 1/18
555,000.00
6.100000
118,863.75
675,863.7S
19,829.50
654,034.25
12/ 1/18
101,936.25
101,936.25
19,829.50
82,106.75
6/ 1/19
585,000.00
6.150000
101,,936.25
686,936.25
19,829.50
667,106.75
12/ 1/19
83,947.50
83,947.50
19,629.50
64,118.00
6/ 1/20
625,000.00
6.150000
83,947.50
708,047.50
19,829.50
669,118.00
12/ 1/20
64,728.75
64,728.75
19,829.50
44,899.25
6/ 1/21
660,000.00
6.150000
64,728.75
44,433.75
724,728.75
44,433.75
19,829.50
19,829.50
704,899.25
24,604.25
12/ 1/21
6/ 1/22
700,000.00
6.150000
44,433.75
744,433.75
19,829.50
724,604.25
12/ 1/22
22,908.75
22,908.75
19,829.50
3,079.25
6/ 1/23
745,000.00
6.150000
22,908.75
767,908.75
.............. ..... ......... ...
813 OD9.50
..........
45,100.75
.............
----- -- -- - - --
10,920,000.00
..............
12,956,983.75
23,876,983.75
2,040,597.63
21.881,486.87
aaasvvcvrvv.r
/aaeaivazcarc
�.--= o === =_ = P= ��caesee /v /u /aaa�aaa�/a
oaoaacauwa
Prepered by Evensen Dodge, Inc.
RUNDATE: 02 -16 -1993 S 12:33:48 FILENAME: SLO KEY: UATE42 -3A
�,n�� �Cr�� 1 �,
�� �,`'�
��� �
� ���
��
r.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 8128
r.
i
(1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING
THE FINAL TRACT MAP FOR VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 2010 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF BROAD STREET AND ROCKVIEW PLACE (3360 ROCKVIEW PLACE)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after
consideration of public testimony, the subdivider's request, staff
recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one -year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
2010 is granted a one -year time extension to March 5, 1994, subject
to the original findings and conditions, as specified in City
Council Resolution No. 6944.
On motion of Council Member Settle
seconded by Council Member Romero
call votes
, and on the following roll
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Roalman, Rappa and MayorPina:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R -8128
Resolution No. 812.8 (1993 Series)
Page 2
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 2nd day
of March
Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
1993.
C- y Clerk Diane Gladwell
APPROVED:
C
City A ministrative Officer
'/
Ci At or y
Community Develdpment Director
t,
n
' RESOLUTION No. 8127`.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING
DEVELOPMENT OF THE STUDENT NEIGHBORHOOD
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND WORKER'S COMPENSATION BENEFITS
FOR SNAP VOLUNTEERS
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue efforts towards improved relations
between students and the community; and
WHEREAS, the Associated Students Incorporated (A.S.I.) of California Polytechnic
State University, and the San Luis Obispo Police Department have developed an
innovative "peer policing" program; and
WHEREAS, the A.S.I. have passed legislation authorizing the participation in a
Student Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP); and
WHEREAS, those students participating in the Student Neighborhood Assistance
Program provide a viable service to the community; and
WHEREAS, SNAP volunteers are not covered by worker's compensation insurance
for injuries or illnesses incurred while performing services as part of the SNAP program;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Does hereby authorize the development of the Student
Neighborhood Assistance Program (SNAP) as discussed in the attachments herein.
SECTION 2. At the time of program implementation, worker's compensation
coverage will be provided for SNAP volunteers who suffer from injuries or illnesses arising
out of an in the course of performing duties assigned as part of the Student
Neighborhood Assistance Program.
SECTION 3. Worker's compensation insurance for SNAP volunteers will be
equivalent to that provided to miscellaneous members.
On motion of Council Member Roalman seconded by Council
Member settle and on the following roll call vote, to wit!
AYES: Council.Members Roalman, Settle, Romero, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of February, 1993 ,
R -8127
ATTEST:
By: Kim Condon, Assistant City Clerk
CONCURRENCE:
JOHN DUNN, CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
WILLIAM STATLER, FINANCE DIRECTOR
�N
. ,
i�.. d`►,�
WWI$
M. GARDINER, CHIEF OF POLICE
ANN SLATE, PERSONNEL DIRECTOR
r�
ASSOCIATED STUDENTS, INC.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
JULIAN A. MCPHEE UNIVERSITY UNION
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA 93407
TEL: 805/756 -1291 FAX: 8051756 -5802
November 4, 1992
Captain Bart Topham
San Luis Obispo Police Department
P.O. Box 1328
San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
RE: Student Neighborhood Assistance Program
Dear Captain Topham
Please find enclosed a copy of ASI Bill #93 -01, "Student Neighborhood Assistance
Program," as passed by the Board of Directors on October 28, 1992.
I am forwarding this copy to yoUr office, to assist your department in further
development of SNAP as it approaches the next stage of review by the City.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please'do not hesitate to contact the
ASI Executive Office at 756 -1291, or myself personally at 545 -9579.
Thank you for your attention and continued support. Your time throughout this
process has been greatly valued and appreciated.
Cordially
Brent Hultquist, Vice Chair
ASI Board of Directors
kj
encl.
Associated Students, Inc.
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo
BILL #93 -01
STUDENT NEIGHBORHOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP)
Article I. Origin
This bill is presented in accordance with Board of Directors Operational Code, Article Vill, Section C, by
Brent Hultquist, Board of Directors Vice Chair.
Article Ii. Purpose
This bill is designed to establish an agreement by and between the City of San Luis Obispo (hereafter
°City) and the Associated Students, Inc. of California State Polytechnic University (hereafter'ASil and is
made and entered into in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein.
Article III. Background
The city and ASI have jointly searched for innovative approaches to involve the student constituency in
securing a safer environment by assisting local law enforcement, and have concluded that a program
involving students taking an active role in specifically defined crime prevention and order maintenance
activities within the community would be mutually beneficial. The goad of the Student Neighborhood
Assistance Program (hereafter 'SNAP') is to provide an opportunity for students to create a safer
environment for themselves and the community. SNAP participants will assist local law enforcement as
first responders to specified student - related calls for service, and provide a variety of student- oriented
crime prevention services.
Article IV. Implementation
SNAP will generally operate Wednesday through Saturday of each week while the University is in session.
SNAP participants will be paid an hourly rate as established by the Operational Rules and Regulations.
Work assignments will be from approximately 9:00 PM to 3:00 AM. There will generally be two teams of
SNAP members, consisting of two students each. The on -duty Police field supervisor will be responsible
for functional supervision of working SNAP members. However, administrative supervision shall remain
with ASI and their authorized agents. (Examples of these two types of supervision are needed.) The City
and ASI shall jointly develop Operational Rules and Regulations for SNAP.
Eauioment
Each team will be equipped with the following:
1. ASI vehicle (clearly marked)
2. SNAP program cap and windbreaker
3. Police portable radio and holder
4. Police flashlight
5. Written Warning cards
Advisory Board
Oversight and review of SNAP shall be accomplished by an Advisory Board composed of:
1. Chief of San Luis Obispo Police Department or his designee
2. Chief Administrative Officer City of San Luis Obispo or his designee
3. ASI Representative
4. Representative from neighborhood /community citizen's group
5. Representative from University Administration
6. Representative from interfraternity Council
7. Representative from Panhellenic Council
S. Representative from Cuesta Community College
9. Representative from Cal Poly Public Safety Department
The Advisory Board shall be governed by Advisory Board by -laws, which shall be developed by the City
and ASI.
Funding
The City will contribute funds for SNAP. The City shall contribute and ASI shall contribute
one vehicle, caps and windbreakers.
Police Author "dv
A SNAP member has no authority to use force or make arrests and will not personally intervene in any
situation that could endanger himself or herself, or any other person or property.
Indemnification
In exchange for ASI's participation in SNAP, the City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless ASI and its
agents, representatives, officers and employees from any and all loss, liability, claims, demands, damages
or costs arising out of any injury, death or property damage that may be suffered or incurred by
participants in the program or any other person, arising out of or in connection with operation of the
program, except that the City shall have no liability for damages or costs incident thereto caused by the
sole negligence of ASI, or its officers, employees or agents.
Insurance
City shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of the operation of SNAP general liability in the
sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for injury to or death of any one person for each occurrence, and in
the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) for injury to or death of more than one person for each
occurrence. Additionally, the City, as the Direct Employer of SNAP participants, shall maintain in full force
and effect during said term of operation of SNAP workers compensation insurance for the benefit of all
paid participants of SNAP. Furthermore, upon acceptance of the title of the vehicle donated by ASI, the
city shall provide comprehensive automobile insurance.
Termination -
This Agreement shall be effective upon execution and shall terminate two years from said execution date
unless it has been renewed by both parties. Prior to renewal of this Agreement, the City and ASI shall
make an evaluation review of SNAP and determine the continued need for such services following the
scheduled termination of this Agreement This Agreement may be terminated at arty time, by either party,
without cause, upon thirty (30) day advance written notification.
OPERATIONAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
1. Each tour of duty will be from 9:00 PM to = AM with a briefing at 8:45 PM.
2. Any observed violations or crimes in progress will be immediately reported by radio
to the Police Department. Members will not take action In crime suppression activities, but will act
as the "eyes and ears" of the Police:by reporting suspicious activity, crimes, etc.
3. Members will respond to assigned crime prevention services such as security surveys,
neighborhood watch programs, elder assistance programs, and other similar duties as assigned at
the discretion of the Advisory Board.
4. All members must successfully complete and consistently comply with the training
program administered by the Police Department. All members must complete and comply with all
training updates and refreshers administered by the Police Department or the ASI.
5. SNAP members will have frequent contact with the public and will be expected to
remain courteous, helpful, and respectful to everyone at all times. No vulgar, insulting, or
inflammatory language will be used by any member.
6. Members will periodically complete written reports as directed.
7. Members shall obey an order or instruction from a law enforcement officer at all times.
S. Members shall be exposed to confidential information from time to time. No
information or knowledge gained as a member of SNAP shall be discussed or in any way divulged
to anyone outside the chain -of- command.
9. All members must successfully complete entrance requirements.
10. Other rules and regulations may be adopted as appropriate.
ENTRANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. Must be enrolled in either California Polytechnic State University or Cuesta
Community College, and be carrying a class enrollment of nine or more units.
2. Must be at least 18 years of age.
3. Must make application to SNAP and successfully complete an oral interview
board and a modified background investigation.
4. Must be free of misdemeanor and felony convictions. Misdemeanor citations may
be excepted on a case -by -case basis.
5. Must possess a valid California drivers license and proof of active motor vehicle
insurance.
6. Must be willing to comply with all program rules and regulations.
U
IC
CERTIFIED as true and correct copy ADOPTED at the regular
in witness thereof, I have set my hand meeting of the Board of
and seal of the Associ ted Students, Inc. Director by vote
117 this �� day of �C �QU� 1992. on 11R rr - � �r� -.
V ,1992.
Drecfov SecretBo i
A pt
Chair, Board of Directors
Sponsored by: Brent Hultqutst; Vice Chair Board of Directors
p:biII9301
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
SNAP TRAINING PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
A. Ride -along Indoctrination
1. One 4 -hour ride -along session
B. Welcome /Briefing
1. Program Goals and Philosophy
C. Police Organizational Structure
1. Structure and Tour
LAWS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES
A. Local
B. State
C. Program
PROCEDURES
A. Program.
B. Patrol
C. Administrative
EQUIPMENT AND SAFETY
A. Use of Police radios and equipment
B. Safe driving Techniques
C. Report Writing
CITY/A.S.I. PROCEDURES
A. Forms
B. Risk Management
C. Policies
COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS
A. Interviewing and Contact Skills
B. Body Language and Values
C. Interpersonal Skills
ROLE PLAYING
A. Contacts
B. Calls
C. Crime Prevention
4 hours
1/2 hour
1 -1/2 hours
3 hours
2 hours
6 hours
1 hour
4 hours
4 hours
VIII. FIELD TRAININta 8 hours
A. Assignment to Field Training Officers
TOTAL 34 hours
�' "�
\U ��
��
1 Y I
RESOLUTION NO. 8126 (1993 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
DENYING A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATIONS FROM OFFICE (0) TO O -PD AND FROM
MEDIUM -HIGH- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH AN HISTORIC OVERLAY (R -3 -H)
TO R- 3 -H -PD ON AFFECTED LOTS IN THE BLOCK BOUND BY
OSOS, PISMO, MORRO, AND PACIFIC STREETS.
(PD 192 -92)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council have
held public hearings to consider appropriate zoning for the subject
site in accordance with Section 65800 et. seq. of the California
Government Code and Chapter 17.62 of the Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered public testimony, the
applicant's request, PD 192 -92, the Planning Commission's action,
and staff recommendations and reports.
NOW THEREFORE, the City council resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings.
1. The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with housing
conservation and neighborhood preservation policies in
the general plan. Specifically, the rezoning would
effectively commit an area zoned for residential use to
nonresidential uses.
2. The proposed rezoning is premature due to the pending
adoption of an update of the Land Use Element.
SECTION 2. Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. The
requests to amend the official zone map for affected lots in the
block bound by Osos, Pismo, Morro, and Pacific streets as shown on
Attachment "A", and the request for approval of the preliminary
development plan as shown on Attachment "B" are hereby denied.
R -8126
Resolution No. 8126 j3 Series)
Page 2
On motion of Council Member Roalman , seconded by Mayor Pinard ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council-Member Roalman, Mayor Pinard, Council Members Romero, and Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th
day of February , 1993.
r
LOT Mayor Peg Pinard
ATTEST:
Citr� C erk Diane Gladwell
By: Kim o on, Assistant City Clerk
APPROVED:
City A ministrator
Attachments:
"A" - proposed rezoning
"B" - preliminary development plan
h v
i2
NY
1C `
ego T� O • -� J
01-
1. ° ocb}%o ppOOea °eae0oa ®
A - ggc` G`00000°`J' go °sga °o °$g cn 3 Sf4G .t.(, S
°oggg e��. eo °o`o
��✓pp\.{i��.`\ � � L� {�T�y,;.�° � � Ct . .0+ ] /° . eg°o° O ° gJ 000° o °' 0°pa.`. ` s i o .°. °°'o a i °$°�C � o°4�o°° n °s° Qne° n o g° gG a e` aO O$'c•''rCG C°e ° °° °e oo:eoO oe oG c $ .° °o`So.o� C° °_� �$cgc $ �$i °Oe °a Oe °°
�
S1.
00
s °g n oe �acci°eo go° S
....o..° �00 o .e'g$ a g .'c
.r,8. 8 •''
/S 3
°�Y °4�°OO °OC °M Og0°OO°°000� ° oGa00]ggOCg`e ° °Y O° -- °OOGOgj�?g�°oj� _ -�ji2
..g.yg`a aOO�e O° ,CaooO $OO$i °o00$CE '.°CO °OC �C Oc�gO�COi °� j °
<Ep s'e °i sssa`s, s'oG%e ° �$ :2$esGssb =J al
$$o°oe
$ao$e °o °0000 °ioo °e °o o�4 °e +o °G °o °o °ao °o °o °o °o °o °p° o°oeo °00000 °o °o °o °0p`i° o 000 °e0000e
e °oeee °o °e° o`o °ee °e° ooeoe e� ° oo °o °o °a e J l��
r o 0000e$e °o °OpO ° oo °00000 °e oeoeo °p °O° °o °o °e °o °e °o °OpOOOO ° °000e°OOOeo °o
�oy�° eooeoo �y
e� '3 ee "eeo°$$gOOeeoe °e °e ° °° oe°p^ooee °oe°$°p $° eo$e ° °ee000 oeoeeo °o °g$o° oe $ooeeO°o° o°o°� "Se °o ?
0. p - eoe°$eooeea$o °po 000e°Oeoe eoe °e °$e° a °e ° °o°o °o °e °p ° ° $ °O oOR ..$o°$° °
$e °po ° ° goofs °g 000 0 og$$ggo $$° o oe .. �. . .
\ go eeg °° oe00° °o °.000ao °o 00 oa 000goo 00 °tf 9O °o °ee°e °e °e °o °g eae$eoe$o °e °oo °e °o °e °e
G 1. ►��fo °fug ee$$a a �$$a n$ >o o °eaeuu $° a a $ ogp$° $� � oo�g ° ° ..
,S Cr`r� "3 ° ao °p u$o °O$$ °ae e$�e ° se oe�cs 3eoo u$ oeaea�ea
e $ Dees
ry � e oo8ee°e O°$oo 00 $$e °oe °oo °$oo eeo g$Po
s ssseeossss$ss
or
'GRAPHIC SCALE J ego$$ ee $$a °gee$$ °gg ° °s$ogsg$a$$ggge
ooe eoo eaoeo$o °e° °° oou °e °o °eo °Oooe o o� .1 9
0 50 100 200
MN
1 Y. �k y
7 rY 9 a � °°
O
VICINITY MAP Pp 192 -92 NORTH
Existing Zoning
_2.J
ii
is
U LL
Ff
-
.. , . 4. 1. - ....
jlli I
II
o
=-jj
U LL
Ff
-
.. , . 4. 1. - ....
jlli I
��� c.�t���i
Jt ��� ti
��- , ,��
•�� c.0 13
f ���' , ,yj � � �
��
'�
RESOLUTION NO. 8100 (1992 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING
THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION
HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992
WHEREAS, a General Muncipal Election was held in the City of San Luis Obispo
on the 3rd day of November, 1992, which election. was duly held and conducted in the
manner provided by the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo, and as provided by law for
the purpose of voting for the election of a Mayor and two Council Members and Measure
H.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of City Council Resolution 8028 (1992 Series), the
Board of Supervisors was authorized to perform the official canvass of the November 3,
1992 General Municipal Election pursuant to the election laws of the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, a statement of the results of said election has been duly entered by the
City Clerk in the official records of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo that:
SECTION 1. The whole number of votes cast in said election within the City of San
Luis Obispo was 23,056.
SECTION 2. The names of the persons voted for, the office for which each person
was voted for, the number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and the number
of votes for and against Measure H and number of votes at each precinct, are shown by the
tabulaton of votes marked Exhibit 'B" and attached hereto, and by this reference
incorporated as though fully set forth.
SECTION 3. PEG PINARD, the candidate receiving the highest number of votes
cast at said election for the office of Mayor, is hereby declared elected to such office for the
term prescribed by the City Charter.
SECTION 4. DAVE ROMERO AND ALLEN K. SETTLE, the two candidates
receiving the highest number of votes cast at said election for the Office of City Council
Member, are and each of them is hereby declared elected to such office for the term
prescribed by the City Charter.
R -8100
1)
r-
i
Resolution No.8100(1992 Series)
Page 2
SECTION 5. The City Council does declare and determine that as a result of said
election, the majority of the qualified voters voting on the measure did vote in favor of
Measure H.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk is hereby directed to sign and deliver to each of said
Peg Pinard, Dave Romero and Allen K Settle a certificate of election certifying to his /her
election to his /her respective office, as hereinbefore set forth.
On motion Of Council Member Settle , seconded by Council Member Romero ,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Settle, Romero, Rappa, Roalman, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 15thday of December, 1992.
ATTEST:
I)i Gladwell, City Clary t
SUN
Resolution No. 8100 (1992 Series)
APPROVED:
City A ffimistrativC Utticef
L F P411
JiF -F
i lerk
Page 3
i�
CERTIFICATE
I, Diane R. Gladwell, the City Clerk of the City of San Luis Obispo, certify that the
following is the final statement of votes cast at the General Municipal Election held in the
City of San Luis Obispo, California, on November 3, 1992
1 - Number of registered voters in City: 28,427
2 - Number of votes cast in the City: 23,056
3 - Tabulation of votes by person:
FOR MAYOR
Peg Pinard 6,872
Jerry Reiss 5,710
Penny Rappa
4,310
Cal Massey
4,064
FOR COUNCIL MEMBER
Allen K. Settle
8,489
Dave Romero
7,742
Brent Petersen
7,624
Dodie Williams
5,557
John Lybarger
3,353
David Jeffrey
2,164
David Friend
1,714
Richie Ray Walker 1,011
4 - Tabulation of votes by precinct (See Exhibit "A")
r
1
Certificate of November 3, 1992 Election
5 - Tabulation of votes by person (See Exhibit "A")
6 - Tabulation of absentee votes (See Exhibit "A')
7 - Tabulation of votes on Measure H (See Exhibit "B ")
Witness my hand and the seal of the City Clerk of San Luis Obispo this 1st day of
December, 1992.
Page 2
71� aw e aw&L"- I -
06e R. Gladwell; dity Clerk
EXHIBIT "A,9
CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK
RESULTS OF CANVASS OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1992
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I, FRANCIS M. COONEY, County Clerk- Recorder of the County of San Luis
Obispo, do hereby certify that pursuant to law, I did canvass the returns
of the votes cast at the General Election held on November 3, 1992, in the
City of San Luis Obispo, and that a xerox copy of the Statement of Votes
Cast (the original of which is on file in the Office of the County Clerk)
to which this certificate is attached, shows the number of votes cast in
said City for and against each candidate for the office of Mayor and Member
of the City Council, and that the totals shown for and against each candidate
for the office of Mayor and Member of the City Council, in said City, and
in each of the respective precincts therein, are full, true and correct.
WITNESS, my hand and Official Seal this day of November, 1992.
F VCOONEY, ou nty Clerk -Rec er
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY 6ENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MAYOR Page 9. 1
Precinct Voters Trnout Pct A B C 0 E F 6 H I J K
Precinct
Number
CN064
1055
740
70.1
42
0
140
249
112
196
1
Precinct
Number
CN065
946
577
61.0
66
0
94
125.
112
180
0
Precinct
Number
CN066
982
644
65.6
56
0
115
188
86
198
1
Precinct
Number
CN067
975
628
64.4
46
0
13B
187
104
151
2
Precinct
Number
CN068
753
461
61.2
30
1
90
132
37
169
1
Precinct
Number
CN069
1OB5
735
67.7
60
0
139
155
127
252
1
Precinct
Number
CN070
1112
757
68.1
67
2
116
160
144
266
2
Precinct
Number
CN071
987
685
69.4
66
0
125
105
76
311
2
Precinct
Number
CN072
924
594
64.3
71
1
112
92
105
212
0
Precinct
Number
CN073
990
681
68.8
48
4
137
153
120
219
1
Precinct
Number
CN074
722
452
62.6
38
0
97
101
86
129
1
Precinct
Number
CN075
900
574
63.8
45
2
91
134
158
141
3
Precinct
Number
CN076
787
498
63.3
39
1
135
115
78
130
0
Precinct
Number
CN077
810
555
6B.5
49
3
91
133
108
170
1
Precinct
Number
CN078
908
632
69.6
48
0
122
142
141
178
1
Precinct
Number
CN079
903
626
69.3
57
1
127
145
142
153
1
Precinct
Number
CN080
791
531
67.1
33
0
122
138
90
148
0
Precinct
Number
CN081
836
589
70.5
42
2
104
182
96
163
0
Precinct
Number
CN096
982
677
68.9
37
0
167
191
113
167
2
Precinct
Number
CN097
495
367
74.1
17
0
104
130
36
79
1
Precinct
Number
CN145
1094
767
70.1
84
2
143
193
108
238
0
Precinct
Number
CN146
1048
697
66.5
76
2
149
118
114
235
3
Precinct
Number
CN147
980
616
62.9
70
2
120
145
77
200
2
Precinct
Number
CN148
911
487
53.5
35
0
95
103
78
177
0
Precinct
Number
CN149
982
638
65.0
75
1
99
135
129
199
0
Precinct
Number
CN150
880
593
67.4
58
3
93
101
132
204
2
Precinct
Number
CN151
1248
B50
68.1
122
1
138
181
177
228
2
Precinct
Number
CN152
1259
B03
63.B
96
1
-149
174
146
235
2
Precinct
Number
CN153
1045
676
64.7
89
1
83
222
113
167
1
Precinct
Number
CN154
959
644
67.2
51
1
115
166
80
230
1
Absentee
Number
ABS064
0
244,
0.0
12
2
40
109
42
37
0
Absentee
Number
ABS065
0
178
0.0
21
0
24
44
37
52
0
Absentee
Number
ABS066
0
183
0.0
19
1
30
65
26
46
0
Absentee
Number
ABS067
0
231
0.0
16
0
41
82
46
45
0
Absentee
Number
ABS068
0
181
0.0
4
1
27
83
23
43
0
Absentee
Number
ABS069
0
150
0.0
B
2
17
35
42
46
0
Absentee
Number
A9S070
0
127
0.0
10
0
29
16
22
50
0
Absentee
Number
ADS671
0
90
0.0
6
0
20
25
14
25
0
Absentee
Number
ABS072
0
93
0.0
13
2
10
21
18
28
1
A. MAYOR
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
B:. MAYOR
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
C: MAYOR
SAN LUIS OBISPO
PENNY RAPPA
;
COLUMN L E 6 E N D
D: MAYOR 6: MAYOR
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO
JERRY REISS Nritein Votes
E: MAYOR H:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CAL MASSEY
F: MAYOR I:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
PE6.PINARD
J:
K:
L:
C �?
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MAYOR
Precinct
D: MAYOR 6: MAYOR J:
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D
E
F
6 H
Absentee Number
ABS073
0
113
0.0
10
0
16
34
18
34
1
Absentee Number
ABS074
0
140
0.0
8
0
39
31
32
30
0
Absentee Number
ABS075
0
167
0.0
.14
0
36
37
45
35
0
Absentee Number
ABS076
0
187
0.0
4
0
52
46
42
41
2
Absentee Number
ABS077
0
99
0.0
5
0
16
20
32
25
1
Absentee Number
ABS079
0
113
0.0
10
0
22
29
20
32
0
Absentee Number
ABS079
0
124
0.0
7
1
27
31
32
26
0
Absentee Number
ABS080
0
209
0.0
6
0
43
57
42
61
0
Absentee Number
ABSOBI
0
130
0.0
9
0
16
43
27
34
1
Absentee Number
ABS096
0
174
0.0
3
1
40
45
25
60
0
Absentee Number
ABS097
0
86
0.0
1
1
29
25
11
18
0
Absentee Number
ABS145
0
85
0.0
10
0
7
27
16
25
0
Absentee Number
ABS146
0
132
0.0
18
1
25
21
28
37
2
Absentee Number
ABS147
0
148
0.0
13
1
22
47
18
45
2
Absentee Number
ABS148
0
237
0.0
17
3
38
55
3B
86
0
Absentee Number
ADS149
0
106
0.0
13
0
10
25
26
32
0
Absentee Number
ABS150
0
127
0.0
6
1
24
35
31
29
1
Absentee Number
ABS151
0
90
0.0
2
0
12
33
22
24
0
Absentee Number
ABS152
0
58
0.0
4
0
5
9
20
15
0
Absentee Number
ABS153
0
40
0.0
1
1
6
12
10
9
1
Absentee Number
ABS154
0
171
0.0
11
0
25
48
26
61
0
Absentee Number
SL524
78
69
88.5
4
0
12
25
6
22
0
Precinct Totals
28349
18774
66.2
1713
31
3550
4495
3225
5725
34
Absentee Totals
78
4282
tttlt
290
18
760
1215
839
1147
12
=0 Total Votes
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
COLUMN LEGEND
A: MAYOR
D: MAYOR 6: MAYOR J:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
JERRY REISS Writein Votes
8: MAYOR
E: MAYOR H: K:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
CAL HASSEY
C: MAYOR
F: MAYOR,;„ I: L:
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN.ILWIS..OBISPO
PENNY.RAPPA
PE6PINARD
Page 9. 2
I J K
O
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION
11 -3-92
CITY
OF SAN
LUIS
OBISPO
- MAYOR
Page 9.
R E C A P
Voters
Tmout
Pct
A
-
B
C
- - -- -
D
- - - -- -
E
- - - -- - -
F
-- -- - -
6 H I
- --- - - - - -- - - -- --
----------------- - - - ---
TOTAL DIST 1 SUPERVISOR
- - - - --
•0
- - - ---
0
- -- -- - -
0.0
-- -- -
0
- - -- --
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL DIST 2.SUPERVISOR
1055
984
93.3
54
2
180
358
154
233
1
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734
82.6
1031
24
2420
3086
2330
3817
23
TOTAL DIST 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304
88.3
58
2
340
391
185
324
3
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10484
8034
76.6
860
21
1370
1875
1395
2498
19
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF GROVER CITY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
28427
23056
81.1
2003
49
4310
5710
4064
6872
46
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
78
4282
ttltt
290
18
760
1215
839
1147
12
TOTAL VOTERS 28427 23056 81.1 2003 49 4310 5710 4064 6872 46
--=---=--=-=---- ---= --- ----------- ------- - - - - -- C 0 L U M N L E G E N D ----------- - - - - --
A: MAYOR D: MAYOR 6: MAYOR J:
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes JERRY REISS Mritein Votes
B: MAYOR E: MAYOR H: K.
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes CAL MASSEY
C: MAYOR F: MAYOR. I: L:_
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS•OBISPO
PENNY RAPPA PEG PINARD .
J K
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL
Precinct
--- --------------
J
- - - - --
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
H
Precinct
Number
CN064
- - - - --
1055
- - - - --
740
- - - -- -
70.1
- - - -- --
42
- - -- -
0
- -- -- -
48
- - - -- -
44
- - - -- -
.267
-- -- --
330
- - -- -
95
- - - --
205
Precinct
Number
CN065
946
577
61.0
71
0
63•
80
189
188
96
143
Precinct
Number
CN066
982
644
65.6
60
2
38
56
212
245
117
144
Precinct
Number
CN067
975
628
64.4
48
1
33
64
217
276
68
170
Precinct
Number
CN068
753
461
61.2
30
0
24
27
172
191
72
130
Precinct
Number
CN069
1085
735
67.7
68
1
50
102
269
198
86*
299
Precinct
Number
CN070
1112
757
68.1
75
3
74
86
239
203
106
268
Precinct
Number
CN071
987
685
69.4
64
3
36
50
281
159
111
318
Precinct
Number
CN072
924
594
64.3
85
0
39
56
192
136
87
206
Precinct
Number
CN073
990
681
68.8
55
2
47
75
216
218
102
.236
Precinct
Number
CN074
722
452
62.6
38
1
37
37
155
167
67
113
Precinct
Number
CN075
900
574
63.8
56
2
78
67
165
210
86
130
Precinct
Number
CN076
181
498
633
44
0
27
61
165
179
78
125
Precinct
Number
CN077
810
555
68.5
38
1
57
58
.251
160
78
206
Precinct
Number
CN078
908
632
69.6
41
0
.64
55
273
200
75
216
Precinct
Number
CN079
903
626
69.3
64
2
55
77
223
217
69
173
Precinct
Number
CN080
791
531
67.1
38
1
26
50
201
212
69
123
Precinct
Number
CN081
836
589
70.5.
42
2
30
58
206
242
84
144
Precinct•Number
CN096
982
677
68.9
37
2
57
97
198
276.
138
133
Precinct
Number
CN097
495
367
74.1
14
0
33
24
106
195
55
73
Precinct
Number
CN145
1094
767
70.1
68
1
32
48
341
174
90
408
Precinct
Number
CN146
1048
697
66.5
70
2
41
55
271
159
105
333
Precinct
Number
CN147
980
616
62.9
79
0
39
40
227
171
B6
226
Precinct
Number
CN148
911
487
53:5
37
1
31
35
199
172
69
171
Precinct
Number
CN149
982
638
65.0
78
1
63
44
262
155
86
261
Precinct
Number
CN150
880
593
67.4
51
2
55
47
238
171
98
220
Precinct
Number
CN151
1248
B50
68.1
112
2
71
76
328
175
84
451
Precinct
Number
CN152
1259
803
63.8
81
1
45
44
335
133
82
522
Precinct
Number
CN153
1645
676
64.7
72
2
32
50
317
106
45
448
Precinct
Number
CN154
959
644
67.2
52
0
30
30
289
185
102
272
Absentee
Number
ABS064
0
244
0.0
11
0
22
13
70
150
29
34
Absentee
Number
ABS065
0
178
0.0
14
1
24
30
66
72
37
14
Absentee
Number
ABS066
0
183
0.0
20
1
23
20
52
77
28
32
Absentee
Number
ADS067
0
231
0.0
17
1
17
32
77
123
29
33
Absentee
Number
ABS068
0
181
0.0
7
0
1
13
45
117
28
25
Absentee
Number
ABS069
0
150
0.0
9
2
15
28
44
64
33
32
Absentee
Number
ABS070
0
127
0.0
10
0
11
17
39
40
33
34
Absentee
Number
ABS071
0
90
0.0
7
0
6
7
33
43
12
28
Absentee.
Number
ABS072
0
93
0.0
11
0
3
8
27
36
25
16
A: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
B: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
Page 10. 1
I
J
K
8
276
1
40
103
0
28
199
3
25
203
0
11
160
0
36
144
4
54
156
0
23
129
2
41
117
1
35
170
1
22
138
2
52
118
2
31
157
1
24
92
0
49
122
0
31
147
1
24
172
0
33
187
1
34
235
1
13
161
1
26
113
1
22
110
4
18
135
7
it
120
1
29
106
0
27
118
2
18
80
2
12
52
2
7
59
4
23
136
3
9
103 .
0
9
44
0
12
50
6
5
85
0
9
86
1
7
33
1.
7
35
0
2
23
0
8
25
2
C O L U M N L E 6 E N D ------------------ ---- ------=-----=-=- ---= - - - - -- -
D: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID ALLEN JEFFREY
E: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
ALLEN K. SETTLE
6: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
JOHN LYBARGER
H: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
BRENT PETERSEN
C:
HER CITY COUNCIL F: HER CITY COUNCIL I: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN,LUIS OBISPO'
DAVID.R. FRIEND DAVE,RONE6O • RICHIE.BAYINALKER
J: HER CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DODIE WILLIAMS
K. NBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Nritein Votes
L:
( i
i
J
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11-3 -92 CITY OF .SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Page 10. 2
Precinct
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D
E
F
6
H
1
J
K
Absentee
Number
ABS073
0
113
0.0
16
0
12
20
27
49
18
14
8
31
1
Absentee
Number
ABS074
0
140
0.0
7
0
12
16
47
66
23
14
5
59
0
Absentee
Number
ABS075
0
167
0.0
14
0
27
33
57
73
27
15
13
36
0
Absentee
Number
ABS676
0
187
0.0
4
0
7
30
70
97
40
29
6
65
0
Absentee
Number
ABS077
0
99
0.0
5
0
11
13
44
45
17
11
9
19
0
Absentee
Number
ABS078
0
113
0.0
6
0
10
13
49
38
20
27
7
34
0
Absentee
Number
ABS079
0
124
0.0
8
0
14
9
48
52
14
22
6
44
0
Absentee
Number
ABS080
0
209
0.0
B
0
6
18
87
98
34
40
6
78
1
Absentee
Number
ABS081
0
130
0.0
7
0
9
10
53
66
25
19
3
38
0
Absentee
Number
ABS096
0
174
0.0
9
0
12
17
42
88
37
34
8
69
1
Absentee
Number
ABS097
0
86
0.0
1
1
6
6
27
43
13
9
2
44
0
Absentee
Number
ABS145
0
85
0.6
7
0
7
11
35
28
8
24
2
21
0
Absentee
Number
ABS146
0
132
0.0
12
0
13
20
29
47
34
29
7
34
1
Absentee
Number
A85147
0
.148
0.0
16
0
10
11
49
57
33
28
8
42
0
Absentee
Number
ABS148
0
237
0.0
19
0
23
24
101
104
52
38
7
53
0
Absentee
Number
ABS149
0
106
0.0
B
0
7
12
39
47
28
24
4
17
1
Absentee
Number
ABS150
0
127
0.0
4
0
16
10
46
61
19
19
12
40
0
Absentee
Number
ADS151
0
90
0.0
5
0
9
12
41
36
5
29
4
23
0
Absentee
Number
ABS152
0
58
0.0
7
0
7
5
26
9
11
20
6
4
0
Absentee
Number
ABS153
0
40
0.0
0
0
3
1
15
12
6
22
1
6
1
Absentee
Number
ABS154
0
171
0.0
11
0
12
9
69
67
40
26
8
66
0
Absentee.
Number
SL524
78
69
88.5
1
0
4
3
31
34
9
11
3
35
0
=_> Precinct
Totals
28349
18774
66.2
1710
35
1355
1693
7004
5803
2586
6867
808
4215
47
_ => Absentee Totals
78
4282
ttttt
281
6'
359
471
1485
1939
767
757
203
1342
10
=_> Total
Votes
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
57
COLUMN L E 6 E N D
A: MBR CITY COUNCIL D: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes DAVID ALLEN JEFFREY
G: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS 091SPO
JOHN LYBARGER
H: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
BRENT PETERSEN
1:.., moil CITY COUNCIL
SAN:.LUIS OBI5P0,
RICHIE RAY-NALKER'
J: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DODIE WILLIAMS
K: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS'DBISPO
Nritein Votes
Lc
B: MBR
CITY COUNCIL
E: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN
LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over
Votes
ALLEN K. SETTLE
C: MBR
CITY COUNCIL
F: MBR CITkOUNCIL`
SAN
LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS`OBISPO-
DAVID_R..FRIEND,
DAYE`.RUMERO .: . .
G: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS 091SPO
JOHN LYBARGER
H: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
BRENT PETERSEN
1:.., moil CITY COUNCIL
SAN:.LUIS OBI5P0,
RICHIE RAY-NALKER'
J: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DODIE WILLIAMS
K: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS'DBISPO
Nritein Votes
Lc
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11-3 -92 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO - MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL Page 10.
R E C A P
----------
Voters
-
Trnout
- -
Pct
A
--- - -- -
B
- - - --
C
- - - - -- -
D
- - - --
E
- -- -
F
6
H
I
J
- -
-------- - - - - --
TOTAL DIST 1 SUPERVISOR
-- ---
0
- - --
0
- - - --
0.0
0
0
0
0
--
0
- - - - --
0
- - - - --
0
- - - - --
0
- - - - --
0
- - --
0
TOTAL DIST 2 SUPERVISOR
1055
984
93.3
53
0
70
57
337
480
124
239
17
379
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734
82.6
1087
26
986
1376
4491
4557
1894
3549
682
3299
TOTAL DIST 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304
88.3
61
3
108
144
373
602
243
249
57
509
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10464
8034
76.6
790
12
550
587
3288
2103
1092
3587
255
1370
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF GROVER CITY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
28427
23056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
78
4282
ttttt
281
6
359
471
1485
1939
767
757
203
1342
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
13056
81.1
1991
41
1714
2164
8489
7742
3353
7624
1011
5557
A: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Blank Votes
B: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
Over Votes
C: MBR CITY COUNCIL
SAN LUIS OBISPO
DAVID R. FRIEND
--------- - -
- - -- C 0 L U M N
L E G E N D -- ------------
---------- ---------=----==---------
D: MBR CITY
COUNCIL
6: MBR CITY COUNCIL
J: MBR CITY
COUNCIL
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
DAVID ALLEN JEFFREY
JOHN LYBARGER
DODIE WILLIAMS
E: MBR CITY
COUNCIL
H: MBR CITY COUNCIL
K: MDR CITY
COUNCIL
SAN LUIS
OBISPO,
SAN LUIS 0BISPO
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
ALLEN K.
SETTLE
BRENT PETERSEN
Nritein
Votes
F: MBR CITY
COUNCIL
I: MBR CITY COUNCIL
L:
SAN LUIS
OBISPO
SAN.LUIS:,OBISPO
DAVE RONERO
RICHIE,RAY NALKER
CERTIFICATE OF THE COUNTY CLERK
RESULTS OF CANVASS OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1992
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MEASURE "H"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO )
I, FRANCIS M. COONEY, County Clerk- Recorder of the County of San
Luis Obispo, do hereby certify that pursuant to law I did canvass the
returns of the votes cast at the above referenced election in said City
on November 3, 1992, and that axerox copy of the Statement of Votes Cast
(the original of which is on file in the Office of the County Clerk) to
which this certificate is attached, shows the number of votes cast in said
City for and against said Measure "H ", and that the totals shown for and
against said Measure "H" in said City, and in each of the respective
precincts therein, are full, true and correct.
MEASURE "H ": "Shall Resolution 8001 authorizing the execution
and delivery of a Water Supply Agreement and Water
Treatment and Local Facilities Agreement and
authorizing certain other actions for participation
in the State Water Project be repealed ?"
WITNESS, my hand and Official Seal this o� day of November, 1992.
FRANCI M. COONEY, unty Clerk -R
i
n
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 MEASURE H - REFERENDUM STATE WATER
Precinct
- --- -'- =---=------
Voters
- =-
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D
Precinct
Number
- - - - --
CN064
- - -
1055
- - - ---
740
- - --- --
70.1
- - -- - -
58
- - -- -
0
-- - -- -
325
- - - --
357
Precinct
Number
CN065
946
577
61.0
65
0
296
216
Precinct
Number
CN066
982
644
65.6
48
1
309
2B4
Precinct
Number
CN061
975
628
64.4
45
0
296
287
Precinct
Number
CN068
753
461
61.2
21
1
241
197
Precinct
Number
CN069
1085
135
67.7
73
1
399
260
Precinct
Number
CN070
1112
757
6B.1
60
0
428
269
Precinct
Number
CN071
987
685
69.4
73
0
406
206
Precinct
Number
CN072
924
594
64.3
61
0
331
201
Precinct
Number
CN073
990
681
68.8
59
1
377
245
Precinct
Number
CN074
722
452
62.6
35
0
216
201
Precinct
Number
CN075
900
574
63.8
55
3
275
241
Precinct
Number
CN076
787
498
63.3
50
0
.229
217
Precinct
Number
CN077
810
555
68.5
65
0
272
219
Precinct
Number
CN078
90B
632
69.6
50
0
323
258
Precinct
Number
CN079
903
626
69.3
63
0
273
290
Precinct.
Number
CNOBO
791
531
67.1
47
0
244
240
Precinct
Number
CN081
836
589
70.5
42
0
283
264
Precinct.
Number
CN096
982
677
68.9
39
0
298
340
Precinct
Number
CN097
495
367
74.1
15
0
162
190
Precinct
Number
CN145
1094
767
70.1
99
0
413
255
Precinct
Number
CN146
1048
697
66.5
99
0
372
225
Precinct
Number
CN147
980
616
62.9
58
1
318
239
Precinct
Number
CN148
911
487
53.5
35
0
265
188
Precinct
Number
CN149
982
638
65.0
B4
0
322
232
Precinct
Number
CN150
880
593
67.4
52
0
331
210
Precinct
Number
CN151
1248
850
68.1
132
0
434
283
Precinct
Number
CN152
1259
803
63.8
126
0
422
255
Precinct
Number -CN153
1045
676
64.7
86
0
384
206
Precinct
Number
CN154
959
644
67.2
53
1
370
219
Absentee
Number
ABS064
0
244
0.0
13
1
92
136
Absentee.
Number
ABS065
0
178
0.0
21
0
69
88
Absentee
Number
ABS066
0
183
0.0
22
0
67
94
Absentee
Number
ABS067
0
231
0.0
23
0
76
131
Absentee.Number
ABS068
0
181
0.0
9
0
52
120
Absentee.
Number
ASS069
0
150
0.0
5
1
75
69
Absentee
Number
ABS070
0
127
0.0
13
0
61
52
Absentee
Number
ABS071
0
90
0.0
9
0
49
32
Absentee
Number
ABS072
0
93
0.0
10
0
43
40
A: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
B: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
COLUMN LEGEND
E F 6 H
D: CITY MEASURE H G: J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H:
F: I: L:
Page 52. 1
I J K
C 4�
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 MEASURE H - REFERENDUM STATE WATER Page 52. 2
Precinct
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
--
C
- - - - -- -
D E F 6 H I 1 K
- -- -- - - - - -- - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- -
------------------
Absentee Number
- - - - --
ABS073
-- - - --
0
- - - - --
113
- -- -- -
0.0
- -- -- - -
17
- -
0
50
-- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - --
46
Absentee Number
ABS074
0
140
0.0
5
0
54
81
Absentee Number
AB5075
0
167
0.0
12
0
68
88
Absentee Number
ABS076
0
187
0.0
16
0
59
112
Absentee Number
ABS077
0
99
0.0
4
0
44
51
Absentee Number
ABS078
0
113
0.0
5
0
48
60
Absentee Number
ABS079
0
124
0.0
17
0
42
65
Absentee Number
ABS080
0
209
0.0
5
2
80
122
Absentee Number
ABS081
0
130
0.0
13
0
58
59
Absentee Number
ABS096
0
174
0.0
13
4
70
87
Absentee Number
ABS097
0
86
0.0
1
0
34
50
Absentee Number
ABS145
0
85
0.0
10
0
39
35
Absentee Number
ABS146
0
132
0.0
17
1
68
46
Absentee Number
ABS147
0
148
0.0
9
1
72
66
Absentee Number
ABS148
0
237
0.0
19
0
104
114
Absentee Number
AB5149
0
106
0.0
7
0
51
48
Absentee Number
ABS150
0
127
0.0
8
0
59
60
Absentee Number
ABS151
0
90
0.0
11
0
51
31
Absentee Number
ABS152
0
58
0.0
11
0
31
16
Absentee Number
ABS153
0
40
0.0
3
0
20
17
Absentee Number
ABS154
0
171
0.0
8
2
89
72
Absentee Number
SL524
78
69
8B.5
4
1
22
41
Precinct Totals
28349
18774
66.2
1848
9
9614
7294
Absentee Totals
78
4282
$It$$
340
13
1797
2129
= =1 Total Votes
28427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
A: CITY MEASURE H
CITY` OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
B: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C_: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
--------- - - - - -- C 0 L U M N L E 6 E N D ------------------------
D: CITY MEASURE H 6: J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H: . K:
F L.
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION 11 -3 -92 MEASURE H - REFERENDUM STATE WATER
R E C A P
Voters
Trnout
Pct
A
B
C
D E
---------- -------- - -- - --
TOTAL DIST I SUPERVISOR
- - - - --
0
- - - - --
0
- - --- -
0.0
- - - -- -
0
- - - --
0
- - - - --
0
- -- - -- - - - - -- - - --
0
TOTAL DIST 2 SUPERVISOR
1055
984
93.3
71
1
417
493
TOTAL DIST 3 SUPERVISOR
15411
12734
82.6
1118
10
6193
5405
TOTAL DIST 4 SUPERVISOR
1477
1304
88.3
68
4
564
667
TOTAL DIST 5 SUPERVISOR
10484
8034
76.6
931
7
4237
2858
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
CONGRESSIONAL DIST 22
2B427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
STATE SENATOR DIST 18
28427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 33
2B427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF GROVER CITY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF MORRO BAY
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF PASO ROBLES
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
28427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
9423
CITY OF PISMO BEACH
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
CITY OF ATASCADERO
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
UNINCORPORATED
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
ABSENTEES PCT TOTALS
78
4282
It##
340
13
1797
2.129
TOTAL VOTERS
28427
23056
81.1
2188
22
11411
4423
A: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Blank Votes
B: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
Over Votes
C: CITY MEASURE H
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
YES
Paqe 52.
F 6 H 1 J K
--------- - -- - -- C O L U M N L E G E N D ---------- -- _- _----- _------
- - - = - =-
D: CITY MEASURE H G. J:
CITY OF SLO REFERENDUM
NO
E: H: K:
F: I: L:
RESOLUTION NO. 8125 (1993 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION'S
ACTION, THEREBY APPROVING SCHEMATICALLY
A CHURCH ON THE EAST SIDE OF JOHNSON AVENUE,
NORTH OF GENERAL HOSPITAL (ARC 162 -92)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this council, after consideration of public
testimony, the applicant's request for approval of a church (ARC 162 -92), the appellant's
statements, the Architectural Review Commission's action, staff recommendations and
reports thereon, makes the following findings:
The proposed project will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare
of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity.
2. The Community Development Director has determined that the proposed
project, as amended by mitigation, will not have a significant effect on the
environment and has granted a negative declaration. The City Council hereby
affirms this action.
3. There is no substantial evidence that approval of this project will have the
cumulative environmental effect of setting a precedent of failing to abide by
the Administrative Creek Policy, for these reasons:
First, this project falls within the lesser setback criteria of the Administrative
creek Policy because: (1) the channel in question has been degraded
downstream and is not judged to be a significant riparian corridor, 2)
adequate buffer area has been provided for those portions of the creek corridor
where riparian vegetative growth is immature and has good potential to
expand; and (3) the lot is an infill site where an irregular pattern of setbacks
has been established.
Second, the Administrative Creek Policy expressly recognizes that the Policy
is to be a guideline which can be departed from when the intent can be met
through alternative approaches. In this case, the varying setback provided and
the additional planting on the site with native, riparian species, is. such an
alternative approach. Therefore, the Administrative Creek Policy has been
followed.
4. The existence of a public controversy over the environmental effects of the
project does not require the preparation of an environmental impact report
R -8125
Resolution No
ARC 162 -92:
Page 2
8125 (1993 Series)
2070 Fixlini Street
because there is no substantial evidence before this Council that the project
may have a significant effect on the environment.
Moreover, those opposing the project have expressed a general desire for strict
adherence to creek setback policies in general, but they have failed to
adequately analyze this particular Administrative Creek Policy. Therefore, the
opponents' fears and desires about this project lack an objective basis for
challenge and do not rise to the level of a serious public controversy. (Pe_rley,
supra, 137 Cal.App.3d at 436; Newbegy Springs v. San Bernard_ ino (1984),.
150 Cal.App.3d 740, 749, 198 Cal.Rptr. 100, 105.)'
5. The proposed church's setback from the creek and from the riparian vegetation
is consistent with other creek setbacks approved by the City in the vicinity.
SECTION 2. Mitigation modified. The City Council hereby modifies the
environmental initial study by changing mitigation measure #6 to read:
6. The lower parking lot shall be set back a minimum of 20' from the
existing riparian vegetation. The building and upper parking lot shall maintain
the setbacks from the riparian vegetation shown on plans submitted to the
Community Development Department December 14, 1992.
SECTION 3. Appeal denied. The appeal of the Architectural Review
Commission's action is hereby denied, and the church is schematically approved with
direction as given by the Architectural Review Commission, as modified by the above
mitigation measure.
Council
On motion of Council Member Roalman seconded by Member Settle and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Roalman, Settle, and Mayor Pinard
NOES: Council Member Romero
ABSENT: Council Member Rappa
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16th day of Few, 1993.
r
Resolution No.8125 (1993 Series)
ARC 162 -92: 2070 Fixlini Street
Page 3
Mayor eg Pinard
ATTEST:
C' y lerk Diane Gladw
City dministrative Officer
{
J