Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8625-8649J' 8649 RESOLUTION NO. (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING PROPOSALS FOR SUBMITTION TO THE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT AS PART OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION REDUCTION FUND (MOVER) PROGRAM WHEREAS, on February 10, 1997, the County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) made available to the public a Request for Proposals (RFP) for projects and programs that help reduce air pollution; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has long supported programs that maintain clean air in the San Luis Obispo region and has adopted plans, policies and standards that support the County's Clean Air Plan (CAP); and WHEREAS, as part of its transportation planning and management program, the City of San Luis Obispo is prepared to undertake new programs, using MOVER funds, which will further the cause of preserving the regions clean air resources.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Council of the City of San Luis Obispo the following; SECTION 1. Approves the following two proposals, attached as Exhibits A and B, and authorizes their submittal to the San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District: Community Bicycle Locker Purchase Program ($15,000 requested) City Voluntary Trip Reduction Program Support ($7,000 requested) SECTION 2. Appoints the City Administrative Officer, or his designee, as agent of the City, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on., which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned projects. Upon motion of Romero , seconded by smith and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman, Williams and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1st day o f April -- . R - 8649 8649 Page 2: Resolution (1997 Series) ATTEST: C' Clerk BonnK L. awf APPROVED AS TO FORM: Motor Vehicle Emission Reduction Program 1996 -97 RFP ATTACHMENT EXHIBIT SUMMARY SHEET /COVER PAGE (This is a suninrary only. All detailed information requested in the RFP must also he supplied) Applicant (include other participating entities): City of San Luis Obispo Brief Project Description: Use MOVER funds(along with employer contribution) to purchase bicycle lockers and make them available to private — sector employers within the City's urban reserve area. Contact Person: Terry Sanville Address: 955' Morro Steet, SLO, 93401 Total Project Budget: MOVER Finds Materials $ 15,000 Personnel $- Other $ -- Type of Project: _ Technology Based X- Trip Reduction Plan Development Matchin_ Funds $ 8,000 Public Education _ Research Phone; 781 -7178 Total Project Costs T 23,000 X Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Implementation Area for Project: San Luis Obispo's Urban Reserve Performance Measures: A. Total Emissions Reduced (tons of NOx, ROG, PM, J: ROG.= 1,204�yr NOx = 708 lb /yr PM10 = 1,051 lb /yr B. Cost Effectiveness (Cost divided by item B): ROG = $1.08 /lb NOx = .$2.16/lb PM10 = $1.62 /lb C. Useful Lifespan of Project (in years): Ten D. Estimated Audience Reached:. 140 employers with 25 or employees a piece (about 8,000 employees) San Luis Obispo County APCD 15 February 10, 7997 O. Project Description: Community Bicycle Locker Purchase 1. Description of Type of Proposed Facilities and Services • Use of MOVER Funds: The City of San Luis Obispo would contact, via direct mailing, private - sector employers within the Community's Urban Reserve boundary. The City would offer to pay (using MOVER program funds) 80% of the cost of purchasing bicycle lockers to be installed at individual work sites. The remaining 20% of the cost would be borne by the employer- property owner. For commercial centers or other clustered work sites, 100% MOVER funding will be provided where a management entity or business association is available to control the use of the lockers and provide maintenance. • Target Beneficiaries: The first -year target group of employers will be those with 25 or more employees or at commercial centers or other clustered work sites that serve a group of small employers. The City estimates that there are approximately 140 private- sector employers within its Urban Reserve that meet this size threshold. If the threshold were lowered to 15 or more employees, an additional 100 employers would be eligible to participate. • Execution of Agreements: The employer would enter into an agreement with the City pledging the use of the lockers for perpetual bicycle storage for employees and depositing the 20% match funding (the City will establish a separate revenue account to manage these deposits). A standard fill -in- the - blanks agreement will be prepared by City staff and will .require little effort to execute on the part of the employer. Once the agreement is executed and the employer -match deposited, the City will order the bicycle lockers to be delivered directly to the work site. The employer will be responsible for installing and maintaining the lockers. The manufactures will invoice the City and the City will compensate the vendors after verifying that delivery has, occurred. • Priority Use of Funds and Program Limits: Execution of agreements between the City and employers will be on a first- come -first serve basis. Funds will be available for the purchase of new lockers but not for the replacement of existing ones or for the conversion of existing indoor space currently used for bicycle storage. The City will establish a.limit on the number of lockers that any one employer may receive. • Selecting Locker Designs: The City would work directly with the employer to identify the type of bicycle locker that best fits their needs and space requirements. The City will solicit information from various vendors and have this information available for review by employers. The City staff will also provide assistance in locating lockers on work sites. e Materials to be Distributed: As part of the direct mailing, literature will be distributed that promotes bicycle commuting and advertises its air quality and transportation benefits. The City will also advertise this program via the print and electronic media. 2. Geographic Area to be Served Eligible employers within the City's General Plan Urban Reserve. This area (see attached map) includes all territory with the corporate limits of San Luis Obispo and future growth areas of the City — including the Airport Area to the south which is the current focus of annexation and specific planning efforts. 3. Description of Benefits and Integration with Existing Programs Bicycling is a 0- emission: form of transportation. The City of San Luis Obispo has an extensive record of promoting bicycling for both work, school and choice trips. The City's Bicycle Transportation Plan (1993) stipulates that bicycle lockers should be provided at work sites and includes specific standards for their provision. As new development occurs, the City requires bicycle lockers and racks to be installed. However, there are hundreds of existing work sites that lack bicycle facilities and the City has little leverage to require them. This MOVER grant program would help address this need by providing employers with the financial incentive to directly participate. Work site bicycle storage can also enable employees who commute to San Luis Obispo from other communities to use bicycles during lunch hours for conducting business within the community without having to search for limited vehicle parking — and as a secondary result, receive the health fitness benefits that bicycling provides. 4. Financial Strategy Use of MOVER funds is described in paragraph #1 above. If additional demand for funding is clearly demonstrated as part of the program's first year activities, the City will (a) apply for subsequent year MOVER funding; and (2) consider using City funds to help support of the program or use other grant - source dollars. It is anticipated that, with regular maintenance, bicycle lockers can last 10 years or more. As previously described, the private employers will be responsible for on -going maintenance of the lockers and managing their utilization. The agreement between the City and Employer will stipulated that on -going maintenance must be provided. Project Background & Organization This program would be managed by the City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Department, Transportation Division. Mr. Terry Sanville, Principal Transportation Planner, would be lead person with assistance from Ms. Reinie Jones and other transportation staff. 2 The City's transportation staff has a long history of being committed to transportation programs that benefit air quality. The City manages the County's most successful transit system, has installed over 30 miles of bicycle lanes, requires pedestrian facilities that create a continuous network of sidewalks and paths, and has adopted plans and standards that foster the use of alternative transportation and the reduction in SOV trips. Emission Calculations /Cost Effectiveness The following tables present key data pertinent to this grant application. Appendix A establishes the methodology used to develop this data. Number of Persons Served per day 54 persons Maximum work trips reduced arrivals and departures): 28,080 trips per yew Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (work trip): 56,000 to 140,400 VMT per year Estimated secondary trips reduced 51,160 trips per year Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (secondary trips) 51,160 to 153,480 VMT per year Total Annual T rips Reduced: 79,240 trips per year Total estimated VMT Reduction: 107,160 to 293,880 VMT per year MOVER fund cost to store bicycle: $29 per year 10 year locker life Comparative Downtown Parking Garage Sto a Cost: $480 per year sl .. .... , _..._.....#� _.. _ ...................... ,.:::..;::::.:.......... ± fiats......:.:: ,::...:::.:;::::::::«.;::_..... . rs....... ...............:.._......#af... _ ....�............. :.... :....... _4............. ROG work trips) 209,291 171,391 140,790 521,472 ROG other trips) 337,656 276,264 226,639 840,559 Total: 546,947 447 655 3-6-754- 2-9 1362 031 NOx (work trips) 132,623 116,765 102,731 352,119 NOx other trips) 188,781 166,782 147,340 502,903 Total: 321404 283 547 2"5-0-10-71- 855 022 PM -10 (work trips) 233,716 Same Same 701,148 PM -10 other trips) 243 522 Same Same 730,566 Total: 477t238 Same Same 1,431,7 CO work trips) 2,033,470 1,669,479 1,392,650 5,095,599 CO (other trips) 3,355,584 2,755,990 2,289,992 8,401,566 Total: 5 389 054 41425,469 3,682 642 13,497,165 sl :.<•. <:`..'F1I;lg Q'C.IROG11 AM I±C?ST.PER 10 UJ1�1D E�F?1gf51C1NS )flC3L` r :'.<`> �I�:::: «::: }:: .:: d ear s:: �tedia�+ �ns::>::::>: : >:: >:: >: >::: >:::: >:: >:::::: >:: ................... ,...... .. n..... ..i...... n..........n..........r....v .: J.....n. ... >...!:.. ..C....... .. : v: ...:..y:::::..v::::...:..y::::: O:^'!.}:: n : }:!!.i:K:::::::::::::::::::::: !:!!. }i }:!!!.:':::::::�• v:::::.. ;vim•: y.::v:.: r.. ROG (work trips) 269,1019 . 461 lb $3.24/lb ROG (other trips) - 337,6569 744 lb $2.16/lb Total:- -- _ 546,947 -g 1,204 lb $1.08/lb NOx.(work.trips) 132,623.8 -- - - - 2921b $5.40/(b N0x (other trips) 188,781 g 416 lb $3.78/lb Total;. 3219404 g 708 lb $2.16/lb PM -10 (work _trips) 233,716_g 515 lb $3.24/lb PM -10- (other trips) _ 243,522 g_ __ ___ 536 Ib _ _ $2.70/lb_ - Total: 477,238 g CO (work trips) 2,033,470 g 4,479 $0.32/lb CO (other trips). 3;355,584 g _ 7,391 $022/lb Total: _ - 5,3$%Q549_ - -- 11,870 . - - - ._ $0.11/lb 0 Work Statement Implementation of the Bicycle Locker Purchase Program would happen as follows: 1. Solicit Information from Vendors:. The City transportation staff will contact various manufactures of bicycle lockers and request copies of brochures and current price lists. We will establish a library of materials at our 955 Morro Street offices for use by program participants and others. 2. Prepare Draft Agreement: We will -prepare a standard -form contractual agreement that will be easy for employers to execute but will bind program participants to maintaining the lockers and advertising their use by site employees. 3. Advertise Program: Using our land use data base, we will establish a mailing list of all candidate employers (and commercial centers) and distribute, via direct mail, information about the program. We will also utilize the print and electronic media to advertise the program to ensure that the client group is aware of the program. 4. Respond to Inquiries and Purchase Lockers: The City Transportation Staff will be available to meet with prospective program participants at City offices or on the work site, complete draft agreements for client execution, and handle the ordering of the bicycle lockers as previously described. 5. Monitoring — Follow -up: The agreement signed by the employer will stipulate that the City has the right to inspect the use of the bicycle lockers. For two -three years after the implementation of the program, City staff will provide spot checks of appropriate use of MOVER-funded facilities. 4 Funding Request - Cost Breakdown The following table identifies the costs associated with this program: Based on the information provided above and in preceding sections that identify potential emission reductions, in theory this program can be scaled to virtually any level of funding. However, given the administrative effort to sponsor such a program, potential demand levels, and limited alternative funding sources, we suggest that the minimum funding level be $10.000. 0 Schedule of Deliverables & Performance Monitoring Assuming the timeline shown on page 3 of APCD's RFP is reasonably accurate and that a positive response from the SLOAPCD Board on this proposal is forthcoming on July 23`d, 1997, the following is an approximate schedule for program deliverables: Solicit Vendor Information and Develop Bicycle October 1, 1997 Prepare Standard -Form Agreement I November 1, 1996 Advertise Program and Begin Accepting I January 1, 1998 —�l Execution of Agreements, Delivery and Installation Through the Remainder of the Program Year and of Bicycle Lockers I beyond (see paragraph below) Program objectives will be directly measured by counting the number of lockers that have been installed during the program year and dividing by the total anticipated installation to determine a percentage 5 ......:...... '.::: ...... P..,...�;,.,.:.,<,..::.... Solicit Vendor Info NA $200 NA $200 Develop Agreement NA $200 NA $200 Advertise Program NA $300 NA $300 Purchase Lockers $15,000 NA $3,750 $18,750 1 Assemble - Install NA NA $3,000 $3,000 Lockers Annual Maintenance NA NA $250 $250 Mo ring I NA 1 $300.00 1 NA $300 ..:r.:.:. r ..::.: ?'E'o#als ,.. $i5 t►Qik ,:. $1 �H? . $'1 $2,3 tiof} Z Based on the information provided above and in preceding sections that identify potential emission reductions, in theory this program can be scaled to virtually any level of funding. However, given the administrative effort to sponsor such a program, potential demand levels, and limited alternative funding sources, we suggest that the minimum funding level be $10.000. 0 Schedule of Deliverables & Performance Monitoring Assuming the timeline shown on page 3 of APCD's RFP is reasonably accurate and that a positive response from the SLOAPCD Board on this proposal is forthcoming on July 23`d, 1997, the following is an approximate schedule for program deliverables: Solicit Vendor Information and Develop Bicycle October 1, 1997 Prepare Standard -Form Agreement I November 1, 1996 Advertise Program and Begin Accepting I January 1, 1998 —�l Execution of Agreements, Delivery and Installation Through the Remainder of the Program Year and of Bicycle Lockers I beyond (see paragraph below) Program objectives will be directly measured by counting the number of lockers that have been installed during the program year and dividing by the total anticipated installation to determine a percentage 5 completion rate (I/G= % accomplished; where I lockers installed and C- 27 estimated total lockers supported by MOVR funding). The following scale can be used to determine employer participation rates and program success`. The City requests the flexibility to retain unused MOVER funding appropriated for the first program year for an additional 12 -month period (a total of 24 months from the execution of program agreement with APCD). If at the end of that time there are unused MOVER funds, they would be returned to the APCD or the City would request their application to other APCD- approved MOVER projects. It is the City's intent to implement "successful" programs; however if employer participation (which is voluntary) is low; the funding should not be unduly tied up. (Note: funding methodologies are not explicitly presented in the APCD's RFP and there are numerous options.) Appendix A: Data MetI. 1 1 1 1 r. • Total Persons Served per Day. Purchase Funding ($18;750) divided by Cost of Individual Locker ($700) x bicycles per locker (2) = 54 persons served. • Maximum work trips reduced (arrivals and departures): 54 bicyclists per day x 2 (arrivals and departures) = 108 trips per day x 260 work days (private sector) = 28,080 trips per year. • Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (work trip): 28,080 work trips times (2 to 5 miles per trip) = 56,000 to 140,400 VMT reduced. • Estimated secondary trips reduced: Work trips per day (108) = 20% total trips per day; therefore total trip = 540 trips per day; subtract work trips (108) from total trips (540) to get "Choice" trips = 432 trips per day; assume 50% of these done by bicycle yields 216 trips per day x 260 work days gives you 51,160 secondary trips reduced per year. e Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (secondary trips): 51,160 secondary trips per year x (1 to 3 miles) = 51, 160 to 153,480 VMT reduced. • Total Annual Trips Reduced: 28,080 work trips+ 51,160 secondary trips= 79,240 total annual trips reduced. • Total Annual VMT Reduction: 56, 000 to 140;400 VMT work trips reduced + 51,160 to 153,480 VMT secondary trips reduced = 107,160 to 293,880 total VMT reduced per year. 6 L • MOVER Fund Cost to Store Bicycle: The estimated cost of each bicycle locker is $700. Typically, each locker can house two bicycles. Therefore, this total amount of program purchase funding should support the purchase and installation of 27 bicycle lockers or storage for approximately 54 bicycles. Given the program's total cost, the anticipated cost per bicycle stored is 26 ($23,000 total costs/54 bicycles). However, given a conservative estimate on the useful life of a bicycle locker of ten (10) years, the annual cost to store the bicycle may be as low as $45. The cost to the MOVER ,grant program (given employer and City contributions) would be about $29 per bicycle per year ($15,000/$23)000 = 65% x $45 per bike per year= $29 per bicycle). • Example of Emission Reduction Calculation (ROG for Work Trips, 1 -5 years): Work Trips per year (28,080) x trip factor from Table 3 of RFP (5.46) + miles traveled (98,200 = average of VMT range shown in proposal Table 1) x VMT factor (0.57) = total emission reduction or 209,291 glyr or 461 lb /yr. • Example of Total Annual Cost of Emission Reduction (ROG. for Work Trips, 1 -5 years): Annual ROG reductions (209,291grams)/ 454 = 461 pounds; MOVER program cost per bicycle($29) / pounds of emissions reduced (46 1) _ $0.06 per bicycle MOVER cost of reduction x 54 bicycles = $3.24 per pound per year My Computffffly n==cnW.arcnWars2 7 Motor Vehicle Emission Reduction Program 1996 -97 RFP ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT SUMMARY SHEET/ COVER PAGE (This is a sununary only. All detailed information requested in the RFP tnitst also be supplied) Applicant (include other participating entities): Brief Project Description; Provide support for the City of San Luis Obispo's Voluntary Trip Reduction Program for its permanent work force by purchasing ten (1) bicycle lockers and installing them at verious City work sites. Contact Person: Terry Sanville Address: 955 Morro Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Total Project Budget: $7,000 MOVER Funds Matchin, Funds Materials Personnel Other Type of Project: Technology Based Trip Reduction Plan Development $ 7,000 $ - -- _ Public Education _ Research Phone: 781 —.7178 Total Project Costs $7,000 Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Implementation Area for Project: Municipal work sites within the City of San Luis Obispo. Performance Measures: A. Total Emissions Reduced (tons of NOx, ROG, PM 10): ROG = 446 lb /yr; NOx = 262:1b/yr; PM10 = 389 lb /yr B. Cost Effectiveness (Cost divided by item B): ROG = $1.57/lb; NOx = $2.67/lb; PM10 $1.80 /lb C. Useful Lifespan of Project (in years): Ten D. Estimated Audience Reached: .325 permanent employees _ San Luis Obispo County APCD 15 February 10, 1997~ C � : m Project Description: City Voluntary Trip Reduction Program Support (Bicycle Locker Purchase) Background: In October, 1996, the City of San Luis Obispo formed a committee of staff members from various departments to pursue establishing a voluntary trip reduction program with the goal of achieving an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) of 1.7 for the City's permanent work force. The committee surveyed City employees to determine the current AVR, asked the employees to identify trip reduction activities that they are interested in, and prepared a program for consideration by the City Council. This program is part of the draft 1997 -99 Financial Plan (2 -year budget) that will be acted on by the City Council by June 30`s. The recommended program includes the following eight activities: Selective Expanded Vacation/Cash Bonus for Trip Reduction Wellness Program Benefits for Trip Reduction Guaranteed Ride Home Program Flexible Schedules to Enable Use of Alternative Purchase Bicycle Lockers Publicity and Program Monitoring Many of these activities involve changes in workforce management, use of existing city equipment, or an expansion of an existing City program. However, the purchase of bicycle lockers has specific and measurable costs and benefits and is therefore the targeted activity for the MOVER grant program. This application presents the anticipated air quality benefits of only the bicycle locker purchase component of our trip reduction program. However, significant additional benefits are possible and anticipated through implementation of all eight activities. 1. Description of Type of Proposed Facilities and Services • Use of MOVER Funds: The City of San Luis Obispo would purchase ten (10) bicycle lockers using MOVER program funds, and install them at various municipal work sites to provide secure bicycle parking for City Employees. • Target Beneficiaries: A survey of the City's permanent work force (325 people) conducted in February, 1997 showed that 34 employees (about 10% of the work force) were interested in the provision of additional bicycle lockers at various sites. If the number of locker currently used by City employees is subtracted from this number, there is a residual demand for enclosed parking for about 20 bicycles or 10 lockers (assuming two bicycles per locker). • Priority Use of Facilities: Use of the bicycle lockers by City employees will be on a first - come -first serve basis. It's important to note that the City provides bicycle racks for short- term bicycle parking at most of its facilities where there is a public demand for them. • Selecting Locker Designs: The City's transportation staff will work directly with the vendors and department personnel at the various work sites to identify the type of bicycle locker that best fits particular space requirements and will assist with the siting of the facilities. 2. Geographic Area to be Served Municipal work sites within the City of San Luis Obispo. It is not anticipated that bike lockers will be installed at some of the more remote utility sites — but no site will be ineligible. 3. Description of Benefits and Integration with Existing Programs Bicycling is a 0- emission form of transportation. The City of San Luis Obispo has an extensive record of promoting bicycling for both work, school and choice trips. The City's Bicycle Transportation Plan (1993) stipulates that bicycle lockers should be provided at work sites and includes specific standards for their provision. The City has a history of providing some bicycle lockers and key downtown locations - but additional financial assistance is needed provide facilities at work sites not currently served or underserved. Work site bicycle storage can also enable City employees who commute to work to use bicycles during lunch hours for conducting business within the community without having to search for limited vehicle parking — and as a secondary result, receive the health fitness benefits that bicycling provides, 4. Financial Strategy Use of MOVER funds is described in paragraph #1 above. If additional demand for funding is clearly demonstrated as part of the program's first year activities; the City will (a) apply for subsequent year MOVER funding; and (2) earmark a, portion of its annual Bicycle TDA (Transportation Development Act) funds to continue support of the program. A specific amount for TDA support. is not established at this point and will depend on continued demand from employers and other funding options. It is anticipated that, with regular maintenance, bicycle lockers can last 10 years or more. The City will be responsible for on -going maintenance of the lockers and managing their utilization. Project Background & Organization This program would be managed by the City of San Luis Obispo Public Works Department, Transportation Division. Ms. Reinie Jones would be lead person with assistance from Keith Opalewski; Parking Manager, and Mr. Terry Sanville, Transportation Planner. The City's transportation staff has .a long history of being committed to transportation programs that benefit air quality. The City manages the County's most successful transit system, has installed over 30 miles of bicycle lanes, installs new sidewalks and requires pedestrian facilities that create a continuous network of sidewalks and paths, and has adopted plans and standards that foster the use of alternative transportation and the reduction in SOV trips. P] r. Emission Calculations/Cost Effectiveness The following tables present key data pertinent to this grant application. Appendix A establishes the methodology used to develop this data. Number of Persons Served per day 20 persons (about 25% of City's Trip Reduction Goal) Maximum work trips reduced (arrivals and 10,400 trips per year departures): Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (work trip): 20,800 to 52,000 VMT per year Estimated secondary trips reduced 20,800 trips per year Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (secondary trips) 20,800 to 62,400 VMT per year Total Annual Trips Reduced: 31,200 trips per year Total estimated VMT Reduction: 41,600 to 114,400 VMT per year MOVER fund cost to store bicycle: $35 per year (10 year locker fife) I Downtown Parking Space Cost $480 per year 3 r�1 ,; <;.::. TABLE 3 3VlUVE� P�tO�RAM CAST PEii PO.L%�tD OF.)��SSIONSv:� � � v< €'? ,. �erlll " " >�tedet�rn' ROG work trip s 77,438 171 lb $4.09 ROG (other -trips) 124,933. 275 lb $2.55 Totals - - 2029371 446 lb _ $1.57 NOx_ (work trips) 49,071 108 lb $6.48 NOx (other trips) 69,849 15.4 lb $4.55 Total: - 1189920 262 lb $2.67 PM -10 (work trips) 86,475 191 lb, $3.66 PM -10 (other trips) 90,103 198 lb $3.54 Total_: 1769578 389 lb $1.80 CO (work trips) _ _ 752,384 _ - . 1,657 $0.42 CO (other trips) 1,231,566 2,735 $0.26 _ Total: 1,983,950 4,392 lb $0.16 Work Statement Implementation of the Bicycle Locker Purchase Program would happen as.follows: • Solicit Information from Vendors: The City transportation staff will contact various manufactures of bicycle lockers and request copies of brochures and current price lists. This will allow us to select the best type of facility for a particular work site application. (Note: this activity is redundant with the City's other grant application entitled Bicycle Locker Purchase Program.) • Select Appropriate Design and Order Bike Lockers after installation locations have been evaluated and modifications to site arrangements approved. • Advertise Program: The City will notify City employees that additional bicycle lockers will be available at specific work sites, will manage the use of the facilities, and maintain the lockers. • Monitoring — Follow -up: For two-three years after the implementation of the program, City staff will provide spot checks of appropriate use of MOVER - funded facilities and determine utilization rates. Cl Funding Request - Cost Breakdown The following table identifies the costs associated with this program: Based on the information provided above and in preceding sections that identify potential emission reductions, in theory this program can be scaled to virtually any level of funding. However, given the administrative effort to sponsor such a program, potential demand levels, and limited alternative funding sources, we suggest that the minimum funding level be $5,000. Schedule of Deliverables & Performance Monitoring Assuming the timeline shown on page 3 of APCD's RFP is reasonably accurate and that a positive response from the SLOAPCD Board on this proposal is forthcoming on July 23'd, 1997, the following is an approximate schedule for program deliverables: Solicit Vendor Information and Develop Bicycle I October 1, 1997 Select Design and Order Lockers November 1, 1997 Advertise Program and Begin Managing Use January 1, 1998 Monitor Use and Maintain Ongoing Program objectives will be directly measured by counting the number of lockers that have been installed during the program year. While siting lockers at some locations will be challenging, the City sees no significant roadblocks to installing all lockers funded by the MOVER program. 5 4.06 ST . .....IB. ........................... .......... ........ ............. . ...... MfJr'1��.± Costs:.:.:..::..: <:. >:: .......................... ......................: :. Solicit Vendor Info NA NA NA Select Design and Order $7,000 NA NA Lockers Advertise Program NA $200 $200 Assemble- Install NA $21000 $2,000 Lockers Annual Maintenance NA $200 $200 Monitoring NA $200 $200 ::.: >::» ... , < >:<: €::: »<:: >::. >;;;;; >......$ im Based on the information provided above and in preceding sections that identify potential emission reductions, in theory this program can be scaled to virtually any level of funding. However, given the administrative effort to sponsor such a program, potential demand levels, and limited alternative funding sources, we suggest that the minimum funding level be $5,000. Schedule of Deliverables & Performance Monitoring Assuming the timeline shown on page 3 of APCD's RFP is reasonably accurate and that a positive response from the SLOAPCD Board on this proposal is forthcoming on July 23'd, 1997, the following is an approximate schedule for program deliverables: Solicit Vendor Information and Develop Bicycle I October 1, 1997 Select Design and Order Lockers November 1, 1997 Advertise Program and Begin Managing Use January 1, 1998 Monitor Use and Maintain Ongoing Program objectives will be directly measured by counting the number of lockers that have been installed during the program year. While siting lockers at some locations will be challenging, the City sees no significant roadblocks to installing all lockers funded by the MOVER program. 5 £= Appendix A-*., Data Methodology • Total Persons Served per Day: Purchase Funding ($7,000) divided by Cost of Individual Locker ($700) x bicycles per locker (2) =. 20 persons served. •. Maximum work trips reduced (arrivals and departures): 20 bicyclists per day x 2 (arrivals and departures) = 40 trips per day x 260 work days (private sector) = 10,400 trips per year. • Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (work trip): 10,400 work trips times (2 to 5 miles per trip) = 20,800 to 52,000 VMT reduced. • Estimated secondary trips reduced: Work trips per day (40) = 20% total trips per day; therefore total trip = 200 trips per day; subtract work trips (40) from total trips (200) to get "choice" trips = 160 trips per day, assume 50% of these done by bicycle yields 80 trips per day x 260 work days gives you 20,800 secondary trips reduced per year. • Maximum estimated VMT Reduction (secondary trips): 20,800 secondary trips per year x (1 to 3 miles) = 20,800 to 62,400 VMT reduced. • Total Annual Trips Reduced: 10,400 work trips + 20,800 secondary trips = 31,200 total annual trips reduced. • Total Annual VMT Reduction: 20,800 to 52,000 VMT work trips reduced + 20,800 to 62,400 VMT secondary trips reduced = 41,600 to 114,400 total. VMT reduced per year. • MOVER Fund Cost to Store Bicycle: The estimated cost of each bicycle locker is $700. Typically; each locker can house two bicycles. Therefore,, this total amount of program purchase funding should support the purchase and installation of 10 bicycle lockers or storage for approximately 20 bicycles. Given the program's total cost, the anticipated cost per bicycle stored is 480 ($9,600 total cost s/20 bicycles). However, given a conservative estimate on the useful life of a bicycle locker of ten (10) years, the annual cost to store the bicycle may be as low as $35. The cost to the MOVER grant program (given City contributions) would be about $35 per bicycle per year ($7,000/$9,600 = 73% x $48 per bike per year = $35 per bicycle). • Example of Emission Reduction Calculations: The emission reduction calculations shown in Table #2 of this proposal were derived from the emission reduction calculations generated for the City's other MOVER grant application and factored down in size. For example, the City's Bicycle Locker Purchase Program Application was based on the reduction of 54 vehicle trips; this application assumes the reduction of 20 vehicles or 37% of the other programs emission reduction impact.. This percentage was simply applied to the larger programs reductions to determine amounts shown in Table 2. Actual numbers may vary slightly due to rounding. 2 �� v� RESOLUTION NO. 8648 (199, - series) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD PROPERTY ACQUISITION WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is considering the acquisition of certain real property in the vicinity of the City, commonly known as the Southern Pacific Railroad property, for wildlife habitat, passive recreation, scenic conservation, potential. mitigation and other public purposes, together with several other public agencies; and WHEREAS, the United State Fish and Wildlife Service has created the. small grants program of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act, whose purpose is to assist in the preservation of small areas of wetland throughout the nation; and WHEREAS, said property contains small areas of wetland within it, which meet the intent of the Act in linking preservation of small areas of wetlands and associated uplands. NOW, THERE_ FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1_ Authorizes the filing of an application to the Small Grants Program of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act for grant assistance for the above project; and 2. Appoints the Natural Resources Manager as agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all .documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Approved and adopted this 1 st day of April, 1997. On motion of Romero -,seconded by smith __- and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman, Williams and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution s adopted this 1st day of April 1997. Ilen K. Settle, _Mayor ATTEST: B nie L. Gawf, c CI APPROVED AS TO FORM: ZA -doll en en, Attp ney R'-'- 8648 RESOLUTION NO. 8647 (199. tries) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS BISHOP PEAK ACQUISITION WHEREAS; the City of San Luis Obispo is seeking to acquire certain real property in the vicinity of the City commonly known as Bishop Peak for wildlife habitat, passive recreation, scenic conservation, and other public purposes; and WHEREAS, the California Wildlife Conservation Board is a State agency which, among other programs, provides funding support for projects designed to protect the habitat of the wildlife of the State; and WHEREAS, staff of the California Wildlife Conservation Board have indicated willingness to consider funding support for the project known as Bishop Peak Acquisition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes the filing of an application to the California Wildlife Conservation Board for grant assistance for the above project; and 2. Certifies that said applicant will make adequate provision for operation and maintenance of the project; and 3. Appoints the City Administrative Officer, or his designee, as agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Approved and adopted this 1 st day of April, 1997. On motion of Romero____., seconded by Smith on the following roll call vote: and AYES: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman; Williams and Mayor - Settle NOES: None ABSENT None The foregoing resoluti as adopted this 1st _ day of Anril 11997. Ilen K. Settle, Mayor ATTEST: nnie L. Gawf, ity CI c APPROVED AS TO FORM: R - 9647 RESOLUTION N0. 8646 (199 _,eries) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS PENNINGTON CREEK STEELHEAD ENHANCEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is undertaking certain improvements to Pennington Creek in San Luis Obispo County, which are designed to improve or enhance the ability of steelhead salmon to move upstream to spawning habitat in the upper portions of said creek; and WHEREAS, City staff have identified_ an alternative to said improvements which would provide for more natural condiifions to Pennington Creek at that site; and WHEREAS, the California Wildlife Conservation Board is a State agency which, among other programs, provides funding support for projects designed to-impeove the habitat of the wildlife of the State; and WHEREAS, staff of the California Wildlife Conservation Board have 'indicated willingness to consider funding support for such alternative improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes the filing of an application to the California Wildlife Conservation Board for grant assistance for the above project; and 2. Appoints the City Administrative Office, or his designee, as agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to; applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. Approved and adopted this 1st day of April, 1997. On motion of Romero , seconded by smith _ and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman, Williams -, and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None The fore oing resolut' was adopted-this 1st day of April , 1997. Allen K. Settle, Mayo ATTEST: die L. :.,' _r' / �APPROVED AS TO FORM: ",-* 10- R - 8646 - " RESOLUTION NO. 8645 (1997 -r' ies) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS SAN LUIS OBISPO AREA FISHERY RESTORATION WHEREAS, the California Department of Fish and Game ( "Department ") has requested proposals for fishery restoration work throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, the Department has stated in its request for proposals that projects intended to particularly benefit salmonid resources of the State will receive highest priority for funding; and WHEREAS, The City of San Luis Obispo maintains a strong interest in the potential for improvement of salmonid habitat within San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries; and WHEREAS, City staff have identified several projects on San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries which could improve salmonid habitat on said streams. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby: 1. Authorizes the filing of an application for grant funds from the California Department of Fish and Game 1997/98 Fishery Restoration Grants Program; and 2.. Appoints the City Administrative Officer, or his designee, as agent of the City to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.. Approved and adopted this 1st day of April, 1997. On motion of Romero _ , seconded by" on the following roll call vote: Smith and AYES: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman, Williams and Mayor Settle NOES: None::. ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution - s adopted this lst day of April , 1997. Allen K. Settle, Mayor ATTEST: nnie L. Gawf, �, Clela APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,��.._. _r , . mey R - 8645 8644 RESOLUTION NO. (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN EXCHANGE OF REGIONAL STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT FUNDING FOR PROPOSITION 116 FUNDING WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has included within its Capital Improvement Program the construction of a bridge to safely provide pedestrian and bicycle access over the railroad tracks at Jennifer Street near the AMTRAK passenger terminal; and WHEREAS, through the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments ( SLOCOG), the City of San Luis Obispo has secured $489,538 in Non -Urban County Proposition 116 funds and $248,500 in Regional State Highway Account (RSHA) funds and has dedicated $272,000 of its own local funds toward the total cost of $1,010,038 for the bridge project; and WHEREAS, the City of Pismo Beach has secured $150,000 in Proposition 116 funding for . the deferred Pismo Creels Bikeway and has requested reallocation of the Proposition 116 fiuids from Pismo Creek project to the Jennifer Street Bridge project, and WHEREAS, the reprogrammed $150,000 of Proposition 1116 funds will replace the $150,000 in RSHA funds that SLOCOG has requested be reprogrammed from the Pismo Creek project to the Pedestrian Promenade project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. That the City accepts the transfer of eligible applicant status and all management responsibilities for the additional $150,000 of Proposition 116 funding. SECTION 2. That the City can encumber the funds within 24 months following fiinding allocation. SECTION 3. That the project will be constructed in accordance with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act. SECTION 4: That upon approval by the California Transportation Commission of the new $150,000 of Proposition 116 funds on the bridge project, the City supports the reprogramming of $150,060 of its Regional State Highway Account funding to the City of Pismo Beach. Upon motion of - Romero _ seconded by Smith and on the following roll call vote: ASS: Council Members Romero, Smith, Roalman, Williams and 'fayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None R - AAAA 8644 Page 2: Resolution No. (1997 Series) the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1 s t day of ATTEST- APPROVED AS TO FORM: IAWI//L.i ��4r.i�cto Mayor Allen K. Settle 199V Pismo 5 I o RESOLUTION NO. 8643 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE WATER REUSE PROJECT (SCH No. 92031048) WHEREAS, the City has published and made available for public review a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Water Reuse Project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Impact Procedures and Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 1997, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. The Council hereby certifies, finds, and determines that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Final EIR has been presented to the City Council and has been reviewed and considered by the City Council prior to approval of the project, (which approval shall occur at a subsequent meeting of the City Council). The City Council has reviewed and analyzed the Final EIR and determines that it represents and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. SECTION 2. The City Council further certifies, finds, and determines that the Final EIR is adequate and that the potentially significant environmental impacts of the project will be reduced to a level of less than significant through the incorporation of the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Appendix L) into the project at the time of approval at a subsequent meeting of the City Council. On motion Of Council Member .Smith seconded by Council Member Romero and. on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council;Members Smith, Romero, Williams and Mayor Settle NOES: Vice Mayor Roalman ABSENT: None The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted on this 25th day of March 1997. Mayor Allen Settle ATTEST` ity Clerk, B/efiinieZav APPROVED AS TO FORM:. � C �' .. , ,.� �� -- RESOLUTION NO.,CU42 (1997 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CM OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 2202 (Phase 1) WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning vesting Tract 2202, as contained in Resolution No. 9485 (1996 Series), and WHEREAS, the subdivider has submitted Letters of Credit in the amounts of $ 820,000 (Faithful Performance) and $ 410,000 (Labor & Materials) to guarantee installation of the remaining uncompleted subdivision improvements per approved plans and the required fees have been received, in accordance with the attached subdivision agreement marked "Exhibit A!', and WHEREAS, the subdivider has requested reimbursement for "direct connections" (laterals) to the sewer and water mains constructed under this tract to serve offsite, non - participating properties, pursuant to City regulations (MC Section 16.44.090) , and WHEREAS, the subdivider is entitled to-reimbursement by the City for over-sizing the water main in Suburban Rd. per Condition 42 of Resolution No. 8485 (1996 Series) in:accordance with Resolution No. 5906 (1986 Series), And WHEREAS, all other conditions required per said Resolution No. 8485 (1996 Series) have been met. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the final map for Tract No. 2202 (Phase 1) has been found to be in "substantial conformity" with the vesting tentative map and final map approval is hereby granted. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the subdivision agreement. P7--8642 Resolution No 864997 Series) Page Two Reimbursement to the subdivider for future connections to the sewer or water mains to serve offsite, non - participating properties shall be established by the Director of Public Works, subject to submittal of the required "certified statement of costs" by the subdivider, in accordance with City regulations. Reimbursement for over - sizing the Suburban Rd. water main from 10 -inch to 12 -inch diameter (1286 linear ft. @ $4.00 per linear ft.= $ 5,144) shall be paid to the subdivider upon satisfactory completion of that work On motion of Council Member Williaonded by Council Member Romero and on the foll owing roll call vote: AYES: Council Vjen�s Williams, Romero, Roalman, Smith and Yayor Settle NOES: Dione ABSENT. None the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 1997. R= CLEP"oiffie ADDrovV as to Fi,�Tn: Yfeffrey G. Jorgenson DevReA ..\12202 -1 final map rep 18th day of march MA OR Allen K. Settle EXHIBIT "A' SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is dated this day of by and between TK Development 11, a California General Partnership, herei4referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred, to as the "City." RECITALS REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain prcipoted subdivision of real property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a description of which it shown on the Final Map of City ct :2;Z02' (Phase 1) Cli of San Luis Obispo, California, as approved by the City Council on the day of �7 199,4. The Subdivider ivider desires that said Tract No. ?202 be accepted and approved as a Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis Obispo (Title 17 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to install the improvements as set forth on the plans therefore. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct and install the following subdivision. improvements in accordance with said subdivision regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, to wit 1 CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS 2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING 3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals. to the property line and water services to the curb stop. 4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 6. ORNAMENTAL METAL RECTIRWERS 6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the inspection 1 ,v. and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be required to file a letter stating that the developer has properly installed all facilities to be provided by him; and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to residents upon request. 7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City regulations. All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated and to the plans and specifications on file and approved by said City Engineer. The lines and grades for all of said improvements shall be established by the Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and specifications. The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above improvements shall begin within thirty (30) days from the date of recording of the final map, and that the work shall be completed within eighteen (18) months of said recording date, unless an extension has been granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work is delayed by acts of God or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the Subdivider shall have an additional period of time equivalent to such period of delay in which to complete such work. Any extension of time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the Improvement Security filed pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California. No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date of the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public improvements unless specifically approved by the City. The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council and has paid the necessary fees as indicated on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2. The restoration of lost section comers and retracement of section lines within the Subdivision shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions. Code of the State of California. The Subdivider attaches hereto, as an integral part hereof, and as security for the 2 performance of this agreement, an 'instrument of credit or bond approved by and in favor of the City of San Luis Obispo, and conditional upon the faithful performance of this agreement. Said instrument of credit or bond is in the amount of $ 820,000.00 which is the amount of the estimated cost of said improvements. Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects in the improvements arising from faulty workmanship or materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring within twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with Sections 66499.7 and 66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California, upon final completion and acceptance of the work, City will release all but 10% of the improvement security, that amount being deemed sufficient to guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a period of one year following the completion and acceptance thereof. Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted, accept said improvements according to said plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said improvements or waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement. If. the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the Subdivider agrees that City may, at its option, declare the instrument of credit or bond which has been posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the proceeds to complete said improvements, or city may complete said improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his surety. The Subdivider agrees to deposit with the City a labor and materials bond in the amount of 50% of the above described subdivision improvements in accordance with State law. Said Subdivider has paid an inspection fee of $ 51,336.00 for City to inspect the installation of said subdivision improvements, and to verify that they have been completed in accordance with 3 the plans and specifications. Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivision," all plans and specifications on file with said City Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all other documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer are hereby referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of the Subdivider under this agreement. It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City hereto that this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective Parties to this agreement. It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful bidders contract unit prices and total bid prices for all of the improvements herein referred to. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by: CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Aj O ` llen Settle dev- revUmct- ms\t22021subdivision agreement SUBDIVIDER TK Development II, a California General Partnership By M. Timm Developme.nt,I.nc., a Califorrn rporation Milan E. Timm, President RPnnral Par -tnar �T Kruetzkampf Investments, a California General Partners Larry Kruetz pf, Partner Gener &l Partner E] EXHIBIT 1 TRACT 2202 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 1. The Subdivider has paid the Howard Johnson sewer lift station fee of $936.90 per Cond. 44 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series). 2. The Subdivider has submitted a monumentation guarantee of $2,400.00 to cover the installation of survey monuments, in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. Said deposit will be released to the Subdivider upon receipt by the City of a letter from the Engineer /Surveyor indicating he has completed the work and has been paid. 3. The subdivider agrees to construct a new traffic signal at Suburban Rd and Higuera and an "interconnect" with the existing Tank Farm Road /Higuera and Los Osos Valley Rd traffic signals, and upgrade of the existing Tank Farm Road /Higuera signal and related striping and signage, including an "Opticom system" per approved plans, pursuant to Condition 30 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series). 4. The subdivider agrees to install a bus stop and transit shelter along the Higuera St. frontage per approved plans and per Condition 28 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series). 5. The subdivider shall pay applicable water & sewer hookup fees and traffic impact fees' per Code Requirement #2 of Resolution 8485 (1 b95 Series).as a condition of building permits. Traffic related improvements including the traffic signals, interconnects, right turn lane from Higuera to Tank Farm Rd, bus turnouts, and shelter qualify for credit against the Traffic Impact Fee. The subdivider shall submit a certified statement of costs after completion of the project to establish the credits per condition 31 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series), 6. The Subdivider has executed an agreement to provide for maintenance of common private facilities, including but not limited to, parking, walkways, driveways, landscaping, irrigation, detention basins, sewers and firelines. Condition 20 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series). requires lot 1 to access through a common driveway and lots 10 - 15 have common driveways. 7. The subdivider shall implement air quality and dust control measures as indicated in conditions 16 through 19 of Resolution 8485 (1995 Series). 8. The subdivider has requested reimbursement for future sewer and water main connections pursuant to section 16.44.090 of the City Subdivision Regulations. dev- rev \tract- ms \t2202 \subdivision agreement 5 M EXHIBIT 2 TRACT 2202 FEE AND BOND LIST 'Bonds" - Improvements• Amount Form /Surety 1. Faithful Performance (required prior to recordation) 100% Public Improvements & 15% Infl. &,Contingency Off -Site Improvements$ 820,000.00 L.0 * 1136 2. Labor s Materials (required prior to recordation) 50$ of Faithful Performance Off -Site Improvements $410,000.00 L.C: 3 7 3. Monumentation Trust Deposit $2,400.00 Fees - (paid prior to final map) AMOUNT A. Sewer Lift Station Fee $936.90 270 persons x $3.47 /person B.. Plan Checking and Inspection Fees 1. Plan Checking Fee- (Suburban Rd) $1,906.16 2. Construction Inspection.Fee (Sub Rd) $8,910.00 3. Plan checking Fee (Balance of Phase 1) $14,004.00 4. Construction inspection Fee (phase 1') 151,336.00 5. Map Checking Fee (Phase 1) $1 drv- rev \tract- ms \t2202 \subdivision agreement co v �d 0 o . 0 N fR CN O R Received f7-rA ' 4 ACCOUNT, NUMBER 520 -70- 508 -696 100 -55- 210 -962 ���� RECEIVED /DATE 2/21/96•' 8/6/96 6F257-96' RESOLUTION NO. 8641 (1997 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 2126 WHEREAS; the City Council made certain findings concerning Tract 2126, as contained in Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series) and incorporating applicable conditions of GP/R. 1346 per Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series), and WHEREAS, subdivision improvement plans have been approved and construction of most of the improvements have been completed, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has: 1) previously dedicated a park (Stoneridge Park) in fee to the City with Tract 1150 (Stoneridge 1) and which provided greater parkland credit than was necessary for said Tract 1150, and 2) previously dedicated the hillside open -space area in fee, and 3) proposes to construct additional park improvements under Tract 2126, and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to quitclaim a portion of the earlier park dedication per Condition No. 18 of said Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series), and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has executed an agreement with the subdivider to guarantee certain maintenance and monitoring of the relocated wetland "area; pursuant to Condition No. 20 of the Resolution No. 8145 (193 Series), and WHEREAS, all other conditions required per said Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series) and Ordinance No. 1217 (1992 Series) required of this subdivision have been bonded for and/or otherwise satisfactorily met, as prescribed in the attached subdivision agreement (Exhibit A). NOW THEREFORE BE TT RESOLVED that the final map for Tract No. 2126 has been found to be in "substantial conformity" with the tentative map, and final map approval is hereby granted. Full credit is hereby granted for parkland dedication and improvements. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the subdivision agreement and the quitclaim deed. 3 Resolution No- 8641(1997 Series) Page Two �i On motion of Council" narber Willianeconded by Council btr.ber Pomero and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Numbers Williams, Romero, Roalman, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: tione the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of March 1997. ATTEST: City Clerk Bonnie Gawf G:\mact-rns\t2l26\finahnap.rep ,o Mayor �r Allen 4 A° n "EXHIBIT An SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is dated this 19th day of starch by and between Stoneridge 11, a California Limited Partnership, herein referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred to as the "City." RECITALS REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real property in the City of San. Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a description of which is shown on the final Map for Tract 2126, City of San Luis Obispo, California, as approved by the City Council on the 18th day of March , 1997. The Subdivider desires that said Tract No. 2126 be accepted and approved as a Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis Obispo (Title 17 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to install the improvements as set forth on the plans therefore. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct and install the following subdivision improvements in accordance with said subdivision regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, to wit: 1. CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS 2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING 3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the property line and water services to the curb stop. 4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 5. ORNAMENTAL METAL ELECTROLIERS 6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the inspection 1 - i and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be required to file a letter stating that the developer has properly installed all facilities to be provided by him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to residents upon request. 7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City regulations. AII of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated -and to the plans and specifications onfile.and approved by said City Engineer. The-lines and.grades for all of said improvements shall. be established .. by. the. Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and specifications. The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above improvements shall begin within thirty (30) days from the date of recording of -the final map, and that the work shall be completed within twelve (12) months of said recording date, .unless an extension has been granted by the City, provided that if completion.of said work is delayed by.acts_ of. God: or-labor disputes resulting .in strike action,-.the-Subdivider shall have an additional period`of time equivalent :to:such period.of delay_ in which :to complete. such work. _Any extension .oU time - hereunder-.shall not operate to -release the- suety -on: the Improvement Security-filed -pursuant to this - agreement. In this connection, the surety waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California. No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date of the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public improvements unless specifically approved by the City.. The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council and has paid the necessary fees as indicated on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2. The restoration of lost section corners and retracement of section lines within the Subdivision shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California. 2 The Subdivider attaches hereto; as an integral part hereof, and as security for the performance of this agreement, an instrument of credit or bond, approved by and in favor of, the City of San Luis Obispo, and conditional upon the faithful performance of this agreement. Said instrument of credit or bond is in the amount of $ 60,000.00, which is the amount of the estimated cost of the said uncompleted improvements. Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects 'in the improvements arising from faulty workmanship or materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring within twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with Sections 66499.7 and 66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California, upon final completion and acceptance of all of the work, City will retain the $60,000 improvement security, that amount being deemed sufficient to guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a period of one year following the completion, and acceptance thereof. This amount is based on the estimated total cost of the onsite and oft site subdivision improvements ($600,000), excluding "wetland enhancement area" improvements. A separate "Bond" in the amount of $10,000.00 has peen posted for a 3 year period to cover maintenance of the wetland enhancement area for this required period, pursuant to Condition 20 of Resolution No. 8145 (1993 Series) and an agreement for same. Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted, accept. said improvements according to said plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said improvements or waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement. If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the Subdivider agrees that City may, at its option, declare, the instrument of credit or bond which has been posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the proceeds to complete said improvements, or city may complete said improvements and recover the full cost and expense 3 f thereof from the Subdivider or his surety. I The Subdivider agrees to deposit with the City a labor and materials bond in the amount of 50% of the total subdivision improvements ($30,000) in accordance with State law. Said Subdivider has paid an inspection fee of $ 13,876.23 for City to inspect the installation of said subdivision improvements., and to verify that they have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivision," all plans and specifications on file with said City Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all other documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer are hereby referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of the Subdivider under this agreement. It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and. the City hereto that this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective Parties to this agreement. It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful bidder's contract unit prices and total bid prices for all of the improvements herein referred to. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by: CITY OF SAN LUI OBISPO: LAS , MAYOR Allen K Settle APPROVED FORM: 4 �� LL//�II['�c� -)MAZ Z k • o' SUBDIVIDER: By: Stoneridge II: a Califomia Ltd. Partnership 4 Cliff Branch J. Edmund Smith Christopher A. Heleniu DevRevV.. \T2126lsubagrmt.2 EXHIBIT) TRACT 2126 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 1. The Subdivider has submitted a monumentation guarantee of $4,500.00 to cover the -. installation of survey-monuments, in :accordance with the Subdivision Map Act: Said deposit will be released to the Subdivider upon receipt by the City of a letterfrom the Engineer /Surveyor indicating he has completed the work and has been paid. 2. The subdivider agrees to construct certain improvements to Stoneridge Park, per plans prepared by Steven Caminiti, dated 12/18/96; including a half- court basketball area, picnic tables, .walkways; drainage, etc. Twenty. thousand ($20,000) dollars of the posted -$60,000 Faithful Performance Bond is allocated. for these park improvements. Based on these improvements and the prior grants to the City of the open =space lot (fee title) and the park (fee title), full credit is given for park dedication and park in -lieu fees are not required with building permits. 3. The subdivider. shall, pay applicable sewer. hookup -fees (impact fees) as a-condition of building permits. 4.. The subdivider .shall pay applicable water impact fees as a condition of building permits. 5. The Subdivider has- submitted Covenants, Conditions . & Restrictions (CC &R's) which include provisions for maintenance of common private facilities-, 'including but not limited to: drainage swales, Stoneridge Dr. entry landscaping, Stoneridge Dr. median island, decorative paving stones and landscaping,- decorative private access driveways, guest parking, private walkways, private sewer main, the hillside cistern system and building that provide for the on -going water supply to the "wetland enhancement area" and- public park, the long -term maintenance of the wetland restoration area and park, protection of wetland plants, the control of exotic invasive plants, and related responsibilities. 6. The subdivider has paid $31,250.00 for the 25% share of the cost of a proposed future traffic signal along Broad St., per Condition 13. This fee will be credited towards Traffic Impact. Fees at the rate of $520.83 per lot with building permits. 7. The subdivider entered into an agreement with the City for reimbursment of $35,000 as the City's total share of an off -site storm drain. Upon acceptance by the City of this work, the unpaid balance of $7,000 will be paid to the subdivider . 8. The subdivider has executed an agreement with the City's Community Development Director per Condition 20 of Resolution No 8145 (1993 Series) and has posted a bond to ensure the subdivider's responsibilities during the 3 -year establishment and maintenance period of the "wetlands area ". (See Fee and Bond list) 5 ,J "Bonds" - Improvements: EXHIBIT 2 TRACT 2126 FEE AND BOND LIST * Credit to Traffic Impact Fees with building permits. ... \tract- ms \t2126 \subagrmt.2 D 869J 1,M00 $31250.00 6 �' Amount Form /Surety Received 1. Faithful Performance a. Uncompleted Public-Improvements $60,000.00 2 ,¢ (/dr e,96 ///170 b. Wetland area (3 yr. Maint.- Cond 20) 10,000.00 50,yp #111 77335662 1B R TOTAL $70,000.00 2. Labor 6 Materials 50% Affp,, (/1.27VW,i �6 of Faithful Performance $30,000.00 3. Monumentation - Trust Deposit $4,500.00 Fees - (paid with final map) A. Plan Checking and Inspection Fees PAID 1. Plan Checking Fee - Offsite $ 2,473.58 100 -55 -210 -462 8/02/95 " Onsite 8,.218.00 100 --55- 210 -462 2. Construction Inspection Fee - Offsite $ 4,300.63 100 -55 -210 -462 " " " " Onsite $ 13,876.22. " " " " 2/27/96 3 Map Checking Fee $ 4,039.00 9/13/96 B. Traffic Signal contribution (cash) $ 31,250.00* Ci65� t ri1�12 1 Q (Broad St. - Condition 13) ` * Credit to Traffic Impact Fees with building permits. ... \tract- ms \t2126 \subagrmt.2 D 869J 1,M00 $31250.00 6 �' CALIFORNIA ALL- PURP&wE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Luis Obispo On February 12, 1997 before me, Judith R. Fritzinger - Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public') personally appeared Cliff Branch Name(s) of Signer(s) ❑ personally known to me roved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she/they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) r 4 •UPf1 h 1UDD R. FRUNGER � acted, executed the instrument. - ,. Comm. ' 1032290 °Q - T ` LtiPUBLIC� � WITNESS my hand and official seal. �yN�OTA 1�oFSw(nf�C San '4 IFOPN\ tai Comm. Expires J� 14..1998 J i .Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL. Though the information b_ elow is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator `- ❑ Other; Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing Signer's Name: i ■ i Individual Corporate Officer Title(s): Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Attomey -in -Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF:SIGNER 0 1996 National Notary Association - 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 - Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Toll -Free 1- 800 -876 -6827 CALIFORNIA ALL- PURR#4E ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of 64A&4� 1A County of c (S D Q1 Sy On Z' before me, _ Date Name and Title of Officer (e.g., "Jane Doe, Notary Public') personally appeared p nally known tome –OR – ❑ proved tome on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same in his/her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand angel seal. OPTIONAL Signature of Notary Public Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: wJ Document Date: e2 l v I C1 – Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: ,k0IJse%l e 1_4�r, 3t jC4_ &e7.6uIlI ) Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name. Signer's Name: ❑ Individual I ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee • Guardian or Conservator • Other: Signer Is Representing RIGHT THUMBPRINT„ _ _ OF SIGNER ❑ Corporate Officer Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attomey -in -Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER 0 1994 National Notary Association • 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91309 -7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder. Call Tall -Free 1- 800-876 -6927 r RESOLUTION NO. 8640 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF TI4E CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR ANNEXATION #47 180,190 TANK FARM ROAD: SPICE HUNTER/SONIC CABLE ANNEXATION (ANNX /GP /R/ER 1 =97) WHEREAS, in the case of a jurisdictional change which will alter the service area or responsibility of a local agency, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(a)(1) requires that the amount of property tax revenue to be exchanged, if any, and the amount of annual tax increment to be exchanged among the affected local agencies shall be determined by negotiation; and WHEREAS, when a city is involved, the negotiations are conducted between the City Council and the Board of Supervisors of the County; and WHEREAS, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b)(6) requires that each local agency, upon completion of negotiations, adopt resolutions whereby said local agencies agree to accept the negotiated exchange or property tax revenues, if any, and annual tax increment and requires that each local agency transmit a copy of each such resolution to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, no later than the date on which the certificate of completion of the jurisdictional change is recorded with the County Recorder, the Executive Officer shall notify the County Auditor of the exchange of property tax revenues by transmitting a copy of said resolution to him and the County Auditor shall therefore make the appropriate adjustments as required by law; and WHEREAS, the negotiations have taken place concerning the transfer of property tax revenues and annual tax increment between the County of San Luis Obispo and the City of San Luis Obispo pursuant to Section 99(a)(1) for the jurisdictional change designated as Annexation No.47 to the City of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, the negotiating parties, to wit: Lee Williams, Deputy County Administrator, R -8640 Annx #47 - Spice Hunter Tax Transfer Page 2 Resolution Nd.. 8640 County of San Luis Obispo, and Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer, have negotiated the exchange of property tax revenue and annual tax increment between such entities as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that such negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment be consummated, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, as follows: 1. That the recitals set forth above are true, correct, and valid. 2. That the City of San Luis Obispo agrees to accept the following negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment: (a) No base property tax revenue shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo. (b) No annual tax increment shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo in the fiscal year 1998 -99 and each fiscal year thereafter. 3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the recorded certificate of completion, the County Auditor shall make the appropriate adjustments to property tax revenues and annual tax increments as set forth above. 4. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the Executive Officer of the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission, who shall then distribute copies in the manner prescribed by law. On motion ofcouncil Member Williams seconded by Council Member Romero and on the following roll call vote: Annx #47 - Spice Hunter Tax Transfer Page 3 Resolution No. 8640 AYES: Council Members Williams, Romero, Roalman; Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of March 1 Mayor Allen Settle ATTEST: i ity Clerk B ni awf APPROVED AS TO FORM: i AIP a O n RESOLUTION NO. 8639 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL ACCEPTING NEGOTIATED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE AND ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR ANNEXATION #46 (151 SUBURBAN ROAD: ERNIE BALL ANNEXATION) (ANNX /GP /R/ER 154 -96) WHEREAS, in the case of a jurisdictional change which will alter the service area or responsibility of a. local agency, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b) requires that the amount of property tax revenue to be exchanged, if any, and the amount of annual tax increment to be exchanged among the affected local agencies shall be determined by negotiation; and WHEREAS, when a city is involved, the negotiations are conducted between the City Council and the Board of Supervisors of the County; and WHEREAS, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(b)(6) requires that each local agency, upon completion of negotiations, adopt resolutions whereby said local agencies agree to accept the negotiated exchange or property tax revenues, if any, and annual tax increment and requires that each local agency transmit a copy of each such resolution to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission; and WHEREAS, no later than the date on which the certificate of completion of the jurisdictional change is recorded with the County Recorder, the Executive Officer shall notify the County Auditor of the exchange of property tax revenues by transmitting a copy of said resolution to him and the County Auditor shall therefore make the appropriate adjustments as required by law; and WHEREAS, the negotiations have taken place concerning the transfer of property tax revenues and annual tax increment between the County of San Luis Obispo and the City of San Luis Obispo pursuant to Section 99(a)(1) for the jurisdictional change designated as Annexation No.46 to the City of San Luis Obispo; and R - 8639 Annx #46 - Ernie Ball Tax Transfer Page 2 - Resolution No. 8639 WHEREAS, the negotiating parties, to wit: Lee Williams, Deputy County Administrator, County of San Luis Obispo, and Ken Hampian, Assistant City Administrative Officer, have negotiated the exchange of property tax revenue and annual tax increment between such entities as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest that such negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment be consummated. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, as follows: 1. That the recitals set forth above are true, correct, and valid. 2. That the City of San Luis Obispo agrees to accept the following negotiated exchange of property tax revenues and annual tax increment: (a) No base property tax revenue shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo. (b) No annual tax increment shall be transferred from the County of San Luis Obispo to the City of San Luis Obispo in the fiscal year 1998 -99 and each fiscal year thereafter. 3. Upon receipt of a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the recorded certificate of completion, the County Auditor shall make the appropriate adjustments to property tax revenues and annual tax increments as set forth above. 4. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of the resolution to the Executive Officer of the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission, who shall then distribute copies in the manner prescribed by law. On motion of Council' Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Romero , and on the following roll call vote: i Annx #46 - Ernie Ball Tax Transfer Page 3 - Resolution No. 8639 AYES: Council Members Williams, Romero, Roalman, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of starch , 1997. Mayor Allen Settle ATTEST: ity Clerk Bonn4Ge APPROVED AS TO FORM: �E � �. �,, ;fie ���, �� '� RESOLUTION NO. 8638 (1997 SEP ^`) State of California Attachments Disaster Number FEMA- 1155 —DR OFFICE OF Federal PA Number 079=68154 EMERGENCY SERVICES State Application Number DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF THE City of San Luis Obispo, CA (Board of Directors or Governing Body) - - (Name of Organizetlot0 THAT Ken Hampian Assistant City Administrative Officer (Name of Designated Agent) (Title) OR Bill Statler Director of Finance /City Treasurer IName of Designated Agent) OR (Nam! of Designated Agent) f Tidal Rloa) is hereby authorized to execute for.and in behalf of the City of Slz6n_Lu9 satObispo CA a public entity established under the laws of the State of California; this application and to file it in the Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining certain federal financial assistance under P.L. 93 -288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the Natural Disaster Assistance Act for flooding and related damage , which occurred in Dec /Jan. of 1996/1997 (Fire. Flood. Earv,quaka. etc.) (month iDatel (year! THAT the City of San Luis Obispo_CA a public entity established under the laws of the State of t ama o rgamzu�on California, hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the State Office of emergency services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. Passed and approved this 1,� day of March , 19 97 t ate t an[ ey Council Members Williams, Rot�iero, Roalman, Smith (Name and Title of Approving Board or Council Memberl Mayoorr; Settle a ano.Title of p r B21CATION Council. 1 ATTES en K. Settle - L. Ga , C y C rk Mayor CERT Bonnie L.,Gawf /Name) duly appointed and Citv _Clerk of (Title of Clare or Cemfying Officlul City of San Luis Obispo California do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of (Name-of Organization) a resolution passed and approved by the _ City Council of the IBOard of Directors or Governing Body] City of San Luis Obispo California on the 18 day of March_ 19 97 [Name of organization) Coca) . (MUnm) Iyaar) Date: 3/19/97 Bonnie L. Cavt, City Clerk (Clerk or Certifying oplUall (Signature/ OES'FOrm 130 (Rev 8191r DAB Form C� C RESOLUTION NO. 8638 (1997 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DESIGNATING THE ACAO AND FINANCE DIRECTOR AS AGENTS FOR THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPLYING FOR COST RECOVERY FROM FEMA AND OES. THIS RESOLUTION WAS DISCOVERED MISSING FROM THE 1997 RESOLUTION FOLDER ON 8115105. THE CITY CLERKS OFFICE IS INVESTIGATING FURTHER. ,--R �Lp RESOLUTION NO. 8637 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING SUBNIISSION OF A SECTION 108 GUARANTEED FEDERAL LOAN APPLICATION TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that a high priority exists for development of new affordable housing and for the rehabilitation of the structure housing the San Luis Obispo County Historical Museum; and WHEREAS, the proposed projects are included in the County's adopted One -Year Action Plan of the Consolidated Plan; and WHEREAS, the Section 108 Guaranteed Loan program, implemented by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is designed to provide funds to assist with these types of projects; and WHEREAS, under the Section 108 Guaranteed Loan program, the City can borrow up to five times its annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocation and can take up to twenty years to repay the principal and interest; and WHEREAS, the City, through the County of San Luis Obispo, is responsible for submitting a Section 108 Loan application to HUD and assumes all responsibility connected with administration and the repayment of the Section 108 loan; and WHEREAS, the City is requesting a total of $1,650,000 in Section 108 Loan funds, with $1,000,000 going to the Housing Authority of the City of San Luis Obispo for the development of affordable housing, and $650,000 going to the City for the rehabilitation of the City-owned building housing the County Historical Museum; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo resolves as follows: SECTION 1. As part of its implementation of its Action Plan, the City Council approves the submittal of a Section 108 Guaranteed Loan application to HUD to assist with the development of affordable housing and rehabilitation of the historical museum structure. SECTION 2. As prerequisites for submission of the application to HUD, the City certifies that it has: R - 8637 r� J Resolution No. 8637 (1997 Series) Page 2 (a) Furnished citizens with information required by Section 570.704(a)(2)(I) of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; (b) Held at least one public hearing, on March 4, 1997, to obtain the views of citizens on community development and housing needs; and (c) Prepared its application in accordance with Section 570.704(a)(2) of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION 3. The City has and will continue to follow a detailed citizen participation plan which meets the requirements described in Section 570.704(a)(2) of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. SECTION 4. The City has and will continue to affirmatively further fair housing, and the guaranteed loan funds will be administered in compliance with: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88 -352, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.); and (b) The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 -20).. SECTION 5. The City will expend in the aggregate, at least 71 percent of all CDBG funds, as defined in Section 570.303(e) of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development of 1974, as amended, during the one, two, or three consecutive years specified by the City for its CDBG program on activities which benefit low /moderate income persons, as described in criteria in Section 570.208(a) of the Act. SECTION 6. The City has and will continue to comply with the requirements governing displacement, relocation, real property acquisition, and the replacement of low and moderate income housing as described in Section 570.606 of the Act. SECTION 7. The City has and will continue to comply with other provisions of the Act and with other applicable laws. SECTION 8. The City has and will continue to certify regarding debarment, suspension, and other responsibility as follows; (a) The prospective recipients of the Section 108 Guaranteed Loan funds and all of their contractors will certify, to the best of their knowledge and belief, that they: Resolution No. 8637 (1997 Series) Page 3 1) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by and Federal department or agency; 2) Have not -, within a three -year period preceding approval of their application, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, malting false statements, or receiving stolen property; 3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)2 of this certification; and 4) Have not, within a three -year period preceding approval of their application, had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. SECTION 9. The City hereby assures and certifies with respect to its application for a guaranteed loan pursuant to Section 108 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, that it has made efforts to obtain financing for the activities described herein without the use of such guarantee, that it will maintain documentation of such efforts for the term of the loan guarantee, and that it cannot complete such financing consistent with the timely execution of the program plans without such guarantee. SECTION 10. The City has and will continue to hereby certify, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the following; (a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of an Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement; (b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for-influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Resolution No. 8637 (1997 Series) Page 4 agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of grant, loan or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and (c) It will require that the language of paragraph (a) of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. SECTION 11. The City shall continue to maintain a drug -free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an on- going, drug -free awareness program to inform employees about the following: 1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; 2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; 3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and 4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. (c) Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in grant activity be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a). (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: 1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and 2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace, no later than five calendar days after such conviction. Resolution No. 8637 (1997 Series) Page 5 (e) Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving such notice under subparagraph (d)2, from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position and title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a. central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification numbers(s) of each affected grant. (f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under paragraph (d)2, with respect to any employee who is so convicted: 1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and any other applicable Federal and State laws; and 2) In appropriate circumstances, require an employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purpose by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. SECTION 12. The City Administrative Officer is hereby authorized to submit the Section 108 Federal Guaranteed Loan application and amendments thereto and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and to execute the application, amendments thereto, and other agreements necessary to implement the Section 108 loan and to act in connection with the application to provide such additional information as may be required. SECTION 13. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. ADOPTED THIS e DAY OF MARCH, 1997, on the following roll call vote: Upon the motion of Council Member Williams-seconded by Council P?eiriber Smith AYES: Council Members Williams, Smith, Romero, Roalman and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution No.8637 (1997 Series) Page 6 ATTEST: City Clerk i nde Gavff APPROVED: jWSection108.res c� � � ���` �.� ����. ��' RESOLUTION NO. 8636 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO HOLDING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HARMLESS FOR HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL CLEAN -UP OR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH CLEAN -UP ON ANY OF THE PROPERTIES TO BE PURCHASED WITH TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT (TCI) GRANT FUNDS AND PROPOSITION 116 GRANT FUNDS FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MULTMODAL TRANSIT TRANSFER FACILITY WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is moving forward with the development of a Multimodal Transit Transfer Center near the Amtrak Station in San Luis Obispo utilizing Proposition 116 and TCI grant funds, and WHEREAS, The California Transportation Comr-mission has previously conditionally approved both the Proposition 116 and TCI grant funds for the purchase of property and construction of the facility, and WHEREAS; one of the conditions placed on the grant applications requires the City to hold the State harmless for any clean-up or cost of clean -up of hazardous chemicals found on properties purchased with Propositon 116 and TCI grant funds, and WHEREAS, the City has worked in conjunction with the County Environmental Health Department who is acting as the regulatory agency, and W IEREAS, the City has shown due diligence in the discovery of hazardous waste on the subject property, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does hereby hold the State of California harmless for hazardous chemical clean-up or cost of such clean -up. Upon the motion of Council limber William$ seconded byCouncil Member Romero , and on the following roll call vote: AYES Council_li mbers Williams, Romero, Roalman, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT:. hone The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 4th day of Mar r - APPROVED: Fit n -O C'JC �, � � n l �� �✓ ,� �i'' '� �� � �� ,� I .,. ,. _ - 8635 RESOLUTION NO. (1997 Series) WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo desires to increase its revenues so as to offset operating losses; and WHEREAS, advertising on City buses is one method of increasing revenues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City hereby approves a policy allowing advertising on City buses, but. not the City trolley, subject to City approved standards and conditions. Upon motion of Roreso seconded by Williams and on the following roll cap vote: AYES: Council P-Ser b s Pomero, Williams, lmalman, Smith and Mzyor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: idone The foregoing resolution was adopted this ATTEST: Bo e Gawp City Cl rk PROVED: 18th day of Fhb- --uary , 1997. Mayor Allen K. Settle _ ec /_ RESOLUTION NO. 8634 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COM IISSIOWS ACTION, THEREBY UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER AND PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING AN ADDITION TO A NON - CONFORMINGBUILDING, WITH A CHANGE TO CONDITIONS, AT 1990 LOOMIS ST_ REET. (A 143 -96) WHEREAS, the Administrative Hearing Officer conducted a public hearing on November 15, 1996 and approved Administrative Use Permit A 143 -96 with conditions; and WHEREAS, Don Wasson and K. Wallace filed appeals of that action; and WHEREAS, EREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January, 8, 1997, and . denied the appeals, thereby upholding the Administrative Hearing Officer's action with modifications to the conditions and code requirements; and WHEREAS, the applicant filed an appeal of that action; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on February 18, 1997 and has considered testimony of interested_ parties, the records of the Administrative Hearing and action, the records of the Planning Commission hearing and action, and the evaluation and recommendation of staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the project is categorically exempt under Section 15305, Class 5, of the California Environmental Quality Act, because it is a minor change to land use limitations, specifically allowing the addition of a small carport to a non - conforming addition, not resulting in the creation of any new parcel; BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findines. That this Council, after consideration of the Administrative Use Permit application A 143 -96, and the Administrative. Hearing, Officer's action and the Planning Commission's action, the appellant's statements, staff recommendations, public testimony, and reports thereof; makes the following findings: 1. The proposed project, as conditioned and modified by this resolution, is consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Regulations, and other applicable City ordinances, and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The addition will not adversely affect persons living or working in the vicinity, because the required street yard on Loomis Street for this lot is 10 feet, whereas the carport will be set back 19', and therefore conforms to the regulations. 3. The addition's size and location are consistent with the intent of the regulations on non - conforming structures (Chapter 17.14 of the Municipal Code), and will not increase the degree of non - conformity oft-he building. 4. The additional bedrooms will intensify the need for more parking for this residential D_P F'lA Resolution no. 8634 (1997 Series) A 143 -96 appeal 1990 Loomis Street Page 2 lot in a neighborhood where on- street parking is at a premium. SECTION 2. Appeal approval. The request for approval of an appeal of the Planning Commission's action approving the use permit is hereby approved, subject to the following Conditions. 1. The applicant shall provide one additional off - street parking space, for a total of two off -street parking spaces, subject to City standards. 2. Design oft he garage conversion, carport and driveway shall be to the approval of the Community Development Director. 3. The existing driveway and ramp may remain, subject to applicable City standards. 4. The applicant shall install sidewalks along both street frontages with design to the approval of the Public Works Department: Sidewalks shall be installed prior to occupancy of the garage conversion, except that the sidewalk along the Henderson Avenue frontage may be deferred if the property owner submits a covenant, for recordation, agreeing to install improvements within 30 days of written notice from the City Engineer. On motion of _ Williars seconded by Romero and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council ?tmbers Williams, Pomero, Roalman, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: Bone ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 1S day of - February 1997. Resolution no. 8634 (1997 Series) A 143 -96 appeal 1990 Loomis Street Page 3 ATTEST- City erk Bonnie APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Allen Settle. ow �� z RESOLUTION NO. 8633 (1991 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UPDATING THE CITY'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is committed to the concept of Equal Employment Opportunity as abasic principle that all persons shall be given equal access and consideration to positions in the public service limited only by their ability and qualifications to do the job, and WHEREAS, Equal Employment Opportunity can best be achieved through definitive programmed affirmative action, and WHEREAS, it is the City Council's responsibility to review the updated Affirmative Action Plan every" odd - numbered year, and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has had an Affirmative Action Program since 1979; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby adopts the updated Affirmative Action Plan, attached hereto marked Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and 'rescinds Resolution No. 8203 (1993 Series). Upon motion of Council t9ember Romro seconded by Council glen -ber Williaris and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Roriero, Rlilliaris, Roa]:rian, .Snith and Mayor Settle NOES: Pdone ABSENT`. done R -86T1 Resolution No. 8633 (1997 Series) Page 2 the foregoing resolution was adopted this - _18� day of February, 1997 ATTEST - 00me 64wf, City Jerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ...... ..... CAV AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN City of San Luis Obispo - June 1991 Updated - July 1993 Special Thanks to the Affirmative Action Committee Cindy Clemens - City Attorney's Office Jeff Gater - Fire Department Ken Hampian City Administrative Office . Pete Hubbard - Police Department Judy Lautner - Community Development Department Barbara Lynch Engineering Jim Montez - Recreation Departrnent Paul Pinedo - Public Works Department Tea Rice - Finance Department Bill Smullen - Utilities Department Jill Sylvain - Personnel Department (Chairperson) TABLE OF CONTENTS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT 3 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 4 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES 5 COMMUNICATION OF PLAN 8 LEGAL ENVIRONMENT 9 IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN 10 • Recruitment 10 • Selection • Job Classification 12 • Training 13 • Employee Benefits and Compensation 14 • Disabled Workers 14 • Complaint Procedure 14 • Sexual Harassment Avoidance Policy 16 • DFEH Poster 19 WORKFORCE. UTILIZATION ANALYSIS 20 GOALS AND TIMETABLES 23 ATTACHMENTS • A. Recruiting Sources 24 0 B. City of San Luis Obispo Position Titles and EEO Job Categories 28 ti. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to the concept of Equal Employment Opportunity as a basic principle that all persons shall be given equal access and consideration to positions in the public service limited only by their ability and qualifications to do the job. Equal Employment Opportunity can best be achieved through definitive programmed affirmative action. If progress toward achieving Equal Employment Opportunity is to be made, every citizen and employee of the City of San Luis Obispo must realize that policies to remove inequalities cannot be merely passive.. Positive steps must be taken to ensure a work environment free of unlawful employment discrimination and harassment, and to promote personnel diversity in the workforce. All persons seeking employment with the City and all City employees shall be treated equally and without discrimination. All recruitments, hirings, placements, transfers and promotions will be made on the basis of individual qualifications for the positions being filled, and all other personnel actions such as compensation, benefits, layoffs, returns from layoffs, terminations, training, social and recreational programs are also to be administered without regard to race, *color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, or physical or mental disability. Employees shall not be discriminated against because of the exercise of their rights under section 3502 of the California Government Code or under the City's Employer- Employee Relations Resolution. 3 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE This Affirmative Action Plan is intended to reinforce the merit principle in public employment. It should not be interpreted as granting "preferential treatment" to specialized population groups, norto hiring under- qualified candidates for employment. It is intended, however, to provide equal opportunity to all who seek employment and promotions within the City, and to provide diversity in the City's workforce. This program is a working tool which promotes the use of purely job- related employment practices, and prohibits all non -job related barriers to employment including reasonable accommodation for the mentally and physically disabled. The Purpose of the City Affirmative Action Plan is threefold: 1. To convey the on -going commitment of the City of San Luis Obispo to affirmative action and equal opportunity for all individuals. Affirmative action is intended to establish fair and equal opportunity for all persons to compete for available jobs. The on -going emphasis on affirmative action recognize_ s that projected demographics reflect the changing character of the State of California and the City of San Luis Obispo, and that we. can expect growing representation of women and minority groups in the qualified available labor market. As a public entity, it is our duty and responsibility to meet the needs of our constituents by anticipating and addressing these changes, and making efforts to ensure adequate representation of women, disabled people and minority groups in the City's labor force. 2. To establish measurable standards by which the results of our Affirmative Action Plan may be monitored. 3. To provide a plan which aids in meeting the goal of equal opportunity in all employment practices. All employees of the City of San Luis Obispo are reminded that the affirmative action concept is an integral, meaningful part of all employment practices.. Every employee is responsible for supporting affirmative action concepts and practices, and maintaining a work environment conducive to achieving the goals included in the Affirmative Action Plan. Obstruction of the intent or process of equal opportunity employment will not be tolerated and may lead to disciplinary action up to and including termination. n n:: ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES To meet the objectives of the Affirmative Action Plan, responsibilities are assigned to each level of the City's organization. Eve_ ryone in the City, including the City Council, City Administrative Officer, department heads, supervisors, employee organizations and individual employees, is responsible for - implementing the program. Responsibilities are allocated as follows: A. THE CITY COUNCIL It is the responsibility of the City Council to establish and to actively and aggressively support the City's Affirmative Action Policy, and to set the tone which ultimately determines the success of the plan by providing policy direction and budget support. The City Council shall review the Affirmative Action Plan by February 1 of every odd - numbered year. B THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER The City Administrative Officer retains ultimate responsibility for the implementation of the Affirmative Action Plan by: 1. Ensuring that department` heads, supervisors and administrative personnel are made aware of and comply with the spirit of affirmative action and the plan's goals and objectives. 2. Allocating adequate fiscal resources to achieve plan goals. 3. Ensuring that the plan is closely monitored and periodically evaluated and updated. 4. Supervising and directing the Affirmative Action Officer. C. THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICER The Affirmative Action Officer is the Personnel Director and is responsible for: 1. Implementation of Federal, State and local laws and regulations. Monitoring the plan for compliance and effectiveness. This responsibility includes, but is not limited to the development, implementation, evaluation and refinement of: personnel rules and regulations; compensation and classification systems; recruitment, examination and selection processes; employee relations and problem resolution processes; personnel records maintenance, audit and reporting 5 I � procedures; training programs; employer /employee relations programs; and all related personnel functions, processes and procedures. 2. Assisting department heads and supervisors in improving utilization of protected groups. 3. Recommending the establishment of training level positions to assist individuals in acquiring skills for regular City positions. 4. Receiving, evaluating and implementing suggestions from City employees and the general public regarding improving the City's program. 5. Receiving and investigating all complaints alleging discrimination, and taking appropriate remedial actions. (See the complaint procedure section.) 6. Overseeing an annual review of the Affirmative Action Plan. D. DEPARTMENT HEADS Department heads are responsible for the following: 1. Ensuring that all employment practices and decisions including, but not limited to hiring, reasonable accommodation, promotion, discipline, assignment, training, and evaluation are based on valid written job - related criteria and are consistent with the plan policies, goals and objectives. 2. Demonstrating good faith efforts to achieve plan goals and objectives through (a) progress in eliminating under - utilization of minorities, women and disabled in their department, and (b) establishing and maintaining a working environment that supports positive, productive and equitable working relationships. 3. Ensuring that staff meetings are conducted at every level on a regular basis, providing training and coaching, and taking other steps as appropriate to ensure that all personnel are aware of and understand their roles and responsibilities. in support of and consistent with the plan's policies, goals and objectives. 4. Ensuring that the job performance of all personnel is monitored and evaluated on the basis of compliance with plan policies, goals and objectives. N 5. Taking steps to ensure.that all employees are given full opportunity for transfer, training and promotion, `arid providing performance, skills and career counseling as appropriate. 6. Taking appropriate preventative, corrective and /or disciplinary measures to ensure that no employee is subject to harassment on the basis of sex, race, national origin, religion, age, color, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation or marital status as covered by the Affirmative Action Plan. 7: Maintaining appropriate records and preparing reports as necessary to document employment practices, decisions, and efforts to achieve program goals and objectives. E. SUPERVISORS Supervisory personnel play the critical role of ensuring that discriminatory practices or harassment do not occur in the work place. They will be monitored, evaluated, and held accountable for . carrying out their duties in directing, training, monitoring, evaluating and related responsibilities in accordance with written valid job - related criteria, and in a manner that is supportive of and consistent with City personnel policies and the policies, goals, and objectives of the Affirmative Action Plan, F. ALL EMPLOYEES Employees are responsible for supporting a work environment and maintaining working relationships conducive to achieving the plan goals and objectives. It shall be a condition of hire, promotion, and continued employment for all City of San Luis Obispo employees that jobs must be performed in a manner that is supportive and consistent with Affirmative Action Plan. goals. An employee should take no action which is contrary to the stated plan goals. If an employee observes inappropriate speech or behavior he /she should . act to correct the situation and /or report the incident to either his /her supervisor, department head or the Personnel Director. (See Complaint Procedure.) G. ALL CITY EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATIONS All Employee Associations, upon agreement will: 1. Advise, assist and support the Affirmative Action Officer in Affirmative Action Plan development and evaluation. 7 I 2. Communicate to the Affirmative Action Committee or the Affirmative Action Officer any concerns that have been brought to the attention of the Association (by employees) that relate to discrimination in any form. 3. Communicate to their members how to use the City's complaint procedure and which state and federal agencies investigate claims of discrimination and violations of city, state and federal policies. (See Legal Environment.) H. THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMMITTEE The Affirmative Action Committee consists of a. member from each City department and one representative from management. The Committee meets no less than quarterly. The Affirmative Action Officer chairs the committee. This committee has the following responsibilities: 1. Advise, assist and support the Affirmative Action Officer in Affirmative Action Plan development, implementation and evaluation. 2. Review and evaluate Affirmative Action Plan goals and objectives annually. 3. Submit recommendations for action on achieving plan goals and objectives to the Affirmative Action Officer. 4. Establish and maintain knowledge of current developments in the field of Equal Employment Opportunity principles, applications and regulatory requirements, and City employment policies and procedures. 5. Record and distribute minutes of Committee meetings as requested. 6. Circulate information to City employees that further educates /informs them about affirmative action issues. COMMUNICATING THE PLAN A. INTERNALLY 1. The Affirmative Action Officer will meet periodically with the department heads and disseminate information on the City's Affirmative Action goals, objectives, policies, practices and procedures. 0 2. The City of San Luis Obispo's Affirmative Action Policy and Plan will be posted in the Personnel Depart ment where applications are. received for employment. 3. The Affirmative Action Policy will be discussed during the orientation of all new employees. A copy of the Policy will be given to each employee. City employees will receive an update of the plan annually. 4. Each department shall ensure that discussion of the Affirmative Action policies, procedures, issues, concerns and /or activities is included in staff meetings. 5. A copy of the City's Affirmative Action Plan shall be made available for review through Department Heads and the Personnel Department. & EXTERNALLY 1. All recruitment sources and other . organizations and educational institutions that participate in the City's employment activities shall be provided with written notification of the City's Affirmative Action Policy: 2. A phrase that identifies the City of San Luis Obispo as an equal opportunity affirmative action employer shall be included in all job announcements, recruitment publications and advertisements. Whenever pictures are utilized, women, minorities and the disabled will be represented where appropriate. 3. All public meetings shall be conducted in accessible buildings pursuant to the American's with Disabilities Act. LEGAL ENVIRONMENT In addition to the City's interest in equal opportunity, there are also Constitutional provisions, Executive Orders, statutes and ordinances which forbid discrimination by employers and which mandate affirmative action in appropriate cases. Some of these provisions are referred to below: 1. The Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California prohibit public bodies from denying any person equal protection of the laws. 2. Federal Executive Orders 11246 and 11357 require federal contractors to have affirmative action programs to assure equal opportunity for minorities and women.. �9 3. Title Vll of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 forbids discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin or sex. 4. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 imposes affirmative action requirements with regard to the disabled on federal contracts. 5. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1976 bans discrimination against persons over 40.. 6. California Fair Employment and Housing Act forbids employment discrimination on the basis of race, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, age over 40 or disability and further requires affirmative action programs by state contractors.. 7. Americans With Disabilities Act fADA/ of 1990 prohibits discrimination against any qualified individual with a disability in regard to any term, condition or privilege of employment. IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN A continuing activity within the City is the on -going review of employment practices to ensure that practices, terms and conditions do not impede the achievement of the Affirmative Action goals. This section summarizes the methods used in implementation of the Plan, and highlights those actions or projects undertaken to enhance the effectiveness of the Plan and to enable the City to meet its Affirmative Action goals. RECRUITMENT • The Personnel Department continually reviews job duties and employment standards to ensure job relatedness. • Job flyers are sent to agencies that represent women and minorities. (See Attachment A.) These agencies have a copy of the City of San Luis Obispo's Affirmative Action Policy Statement. • Job employment opportunities and positions are advertised in local newspapers. 10 0 Mid - management and management'.jobs are advertised in the Affirmative Action Register and /or other minority publications as appropriate. Y The City continuously seeks referrals from the Employment Development Department. • Active recruitment and advertising is done through the higher education institutions, such as Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Cuesta College, Allan Hancock College and various State Universities. Other schools maybe added if a more extensive recruitment effort is needed. • The City. incorporates innovative recruitment processes such as the Job Hot Line phone service, a Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (T.D.D.), providing readers and interpreters whenever possible. • Public awareness of public service careers is increased through participation in school "Career Days" and recruitment presentations at public functions. s Job interest is promoted through such programs as ride- alongs, orientation programs, and fire station tours. SELECTION • All raters receive orientation prior to serving on an oral board on the City's Affirmative Action policy and compliance with Equal Employment Opportunity regulations. • Applicant flow data is analyzed to identify any barriers in the selection process that may lead to adverse impact. o Equal Employment Opportunity information is removed from all applications before they are screened to prevent identification of protected groups. Information is analyzed to determine if the City is receiving applications from women and minorities in proportion to the labor force market availability. s Applicant screening for regular positions is done by at least one subject matter expert (SME) to ensure job - relatedness of qualifications presented on applications. s Testing is continually reviewed for adverse impact. When written testing is required, content validated tests are used. 11 • Objective raters from outside the City organization are used whenever possible for the interview panels. Whenever available a qualified woman or minority subject matter expert is used. The oral boards are monitored by staff from personnel to assure that all candidates are treated equally and fairly. • Oral examinations are structured interviews to ensure job- relatedness. • In . categories of employment where under- utilization exists, the appointing authority is encouraged to make selections that further Affirmative Action goals in cases where candidates are similarly qualified. • Promotions are monitored to ensure decisions are based on the ability to perform the essential functions of the job. • Eligibility lists are established and selection is made from those qualified candidates who are on the list. JOB CLASSIFICATION • The City performs classification studies on an on -going basis to ensure that job - related and bona fide occupational qualifications are presentthat eliminate barriers to equal opportunity. • Many classifications are grouped as part of a series, which enable incumbents to advance within the series to the highest working class. Such advancement shall be based on their attainment and demonstrated performance of the required skills, knowledge, abilities and /or required certification, and the recommendation of the department head. • Employees who meet the minimum requirements for the next level position in a series will be given an opportunity during each calendar year to be approved for advancement. • The non - competitive promotion action is treated as any other promotion as outlined in the Personnel Rules and Regulations. 12 TRAINING • In 1890 all City employees participated in a Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training class. Training will continue semi - annually for the next five years for new employees. • In 1993 training will focus on ethnic diversity and /or disability awareness. Thereafter, City employees will receive annual training in E:E.O. • Employees interested in learning supervisory skills that will help them to be promoted within this organization are given opportunities to attend training classes given for supervisors. • The Personnel Department has a library available to all employees that contains training materials such as tapes, videos, and books on topics such as supervision, management, communication skills, etc. • Seminar information is routinely circulated to the departments and employees are able to attend work - related seminars. • New employees receive a copy of the City's Affirmative Action Policy and receive an overview of the Affirmative Action Plan as part of employee orientation. • Within budgetary constraints, the City will consider the adoption of a tuition reimbursement program to encourage all employees to continue their education and training opportunities at accredited educational institutions recognizing that lack of education or a college degree can be a barrier in promotional opportunities. • The Personnel Department will provide counseling to employees regarding promotional opportunities and encourage protected group employees to participate in career progression and development activities. • Departments will develop on- the -job training programs to assist employees in developing skills for promotion. 13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND COMPENSATION • The Personnel Department reviews all elements of benefits and compensation to ensure there is no disparity in the compensation received by male and female employees, or by minority group employees and other employees for performing equivalent duties. • Opportunities for performing overtime work or otherwise earning increased compensation is afforded without discrimination to all employees. DISABLED WORKERS • All physical and mental qualifications are reviewed to ensure that requirements are essential job - related and consistent with safe performance. • Functional requirements will be reviewed as job openings occur and disabled individuals are considered for those jobs. • The City will make any and all reasonable accommodations to the physical and mental limitations of disabled individuals. • Within budgetary constraints, the City shall modify its telecommunications systems to provide hearing- impaired persons with access to City services and employment information. • The City conducts all public meetings in facilities that are wheelchair accessible. • The City reviews all future facility acquisitions and remodeling for removal of architectural barriers. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE A. Any employee who feels he /she has been the victim of employment discrimination or sexual harassment should contact EITHER his /her supervisor, department head or Personnel Director as soon as possible, as time is of the essence in investigating charges. The initial report can be oral or written, but a written and signed statement of the complaint must be submitted by the complainant within five scheduled work days _ of the initial report so an investigation can proceed into the matter. The formal written complaint must 14 cite the specific incident(s), and may ,-inc lude the desired resolution. The Personnel Director will advise the City' Administrative Officer of the receipt of all written employment discrimination complaints. B. Upon receipt of the written complaint, the Personnel Department will conduct or refer to others an investigation of the charges, including contacting the person(s) who allegedly engaged in the employment discrimination or sexual harassment, informing him /her /them of the basis of the complaint and providing an opportunity to respond. The Personnel Department will report in writing to the complainant within ten working days of the progress and future course of the investigation. Updates will be provided monthly thereafter. C. Upon completion of the investigation, the Personnel Department and department head will consult on what, if any; disciplinary action will be taken. Discipline will be imposed by the department head or the appropriate official as specified in the Personnel Rules and. Regulations. Both parties will be notified of the action to be taken. The Personnel Director will advise. the City Administrative Officer of the disposition of all employment discrimination complaints. D. If it is determined that employment discrimination or sexual harassment has occurred, appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, will be taken. The severity of the discipline will be determined by the severity and /or .frequency of the offense.. E. Disciplinary action taken under this procedure may be appealed with or without representation subject to appeal or grievance procedures indicated in the appropriate Memorandum of Agreement or Personnel Rules and Regulations. F. A complainant who is not satisfied with the disposition of the investigation may submit an appeal to the City Administrative Officer within ten scheduled work days from receipt of the conclusion of the Personnel Director. G. Complainants may appeal the City Administrator Officer's disposition of the investigation to the Personnel Board. H. Please refer to page 19 for further information. CONFIDENTIALITY To the extent feasible, proceedings under this policy and all reports and records filed shall be confidential to the parties involved, and reasonable effort shall be made to protect the privacy interests of the parties. 15 SEXUAL HARASSMENT AVOIDANCE POLICY It is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo that all employees should be able to enjoy . a work environment free from all forms of discrimination, including sexual harassment. In accordance with federal regulations requiring employers to adopt clear policies prohibiting sexual harassment in employment, the City Council has adopted the policy statement set forth in full below: Policy Against Sexual Harassment: It is the policy of the City of San Luis Obispo that employees have a working environment free of unlawful discrimination. The work environment should be business -like and assure fair, courteous treatment for employees and the public we serve. Sexual harassment may constitute illegal sex discrimination and may violate both state and federal law. It is employee misconduct that could decrease work productivity, undermine the integrity of employment relationships; decrease morale and cause severe emotional and physical stress. All employees should be informed of the discrimination complaint process and be assured of their right to file complaints without fear of reprisal: All employees, including supervisors and managers, shall receive ongoing training regarding behavior that constitutes sexual harassment. Employees should also understand the importance of reporting incidents promptly to assure that further incidents do not occur. The City Council expects City department heads to convey to their employees strong disapproval of sexual harassment. All employees including supervisors and managers should be clearly informed regarding behavior that constitutes sexual harassment or creates the perception of sexual harassment and the consequences of such actions. The employees should be aware that sexual harassment of another employee shall be grounds for disciplinary action; Employees also should be aware that ignoring sexual harassment complaints is also grounds for disciplinary action. Definition of Sexual Harassment: "Sexual harassment" as used in this policy includes any unsolicited and unwelcome sexual overtures by any employee, supervisor, manager or, non - employee, be they written, verbal, physical, visual, whenever:. 16 • Submission is mader :either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of assigniment or employment; • Submission or rejection by an employee is used as a basis for employment decisions affecting the employee; or • Such .conduct has the potential to affect an employee's work performance negatively or create an intimidating, hostile or otherwise offensive work environment. RESPONSIBILITY- Employee: 1. If possible, politely but firmly confront whomever is doing the harassing. State how you feel about his /her actions and request that the person cease harassing you immediately. Document in writing the date, location and conversation for your own records. 2. If this does not resolve the concern (problem /situation) or if the employee .feels uncomfortable or threatened, report any act of sexual harassment to your immediate supervisor or department head or the Personnel Department, as provided in the complaint, procedure. The choice is left uo to the- emplovee. Supervisor Department Head 1. Inform all employees under your direction of the City policy and complaint procedure regarding sexual harassment. 2. Receive complaints of sexual harassment from employees and immediately report any complaints of sexual harassment to the Personnel Department 3. Confer with the Personnel Department on extent of investigation and discipline. 4. Following the investigation, take appropriate action, including discipline as appropriate. 17 Personnel Department 1. Conduct Sexual Harassment Avoidance Training Programs for all City employees. 2. Assume responsibility for administration of the complaint procedure. 3. Receive and review any and all complaints. 4. Conduct or assist in all investigations and consult with the Department Head on disciplinary action as may be appropriate. 5. Advise City Administrative Officer of the receipt and disposition of all sexual harassment complaints. 6. Prepare the documentation for the hearing before the City Administrative Officer. City Administrative Officer 1. Assume responsibility for the administrative appeal process. 2. Conduct a confidential hearing as expeditiously as possible upon receipt of an appeal. 3. Provide the employee with a written response within ten scheduled work days from the conclusion of the administrative hearing. Personnel Board 1. Hear appeals of disciplinary action pursuant to the City Personnel Rules and Regulations and appeals from employees dissatisfied with the City Administrative Officer's disposition of the investigation in accordance with the City's Grievance procedures. 18 \ DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT •Race ""Color • National Origin *Medical Condition Because of *Ancestry • Religious Creed •Physical Handicap (Including AIDS) Sex *Age *Marital Status IS PROHIBITED BY LAW The California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Pars 2.8 (eoonnlenlciro with Section 12800) at Div. 3 of Title 2 of ft Go-a nnsa Ostia) • permih job applice to file complaints „with tlr Deparhnry of Fair EmOvInrard and Housh COMM against an employer. employmem agency. or labor monwhieh tails to pram a" erMloymerd as req., by law. • requires employers not to dnammi hate. against any job apOli am or worker In Ming. pot otiora_,.- assiprarbnts. or disefarge. On4he�job segregaton is also profabkeC, and employers may ftle agametworkent who refuse to cooperate in coniptiirm. • requires employers. employment apnuasa, and unions to preserve applications. personnel and airrylcyaisot referral reeords.for a mill 4 o! two years • regLnres employes to provide leaves of up to lour morltlm to errtpoyees disabled bemuse of pregnancy. matemby, or ehkbrft . • requires engbyrnra agencies to serve all app6ra is eque9y; to refuse dscrim6letory job orders; to.rslram from pro- hibned pieftb 4lounes cr help�wanted.advertleinp. • requvae arnions not to diaaeninate m member admissions or dispetdtin g to jobs. • forbids any person to interfere with at" to comply with the ACL Authoraes tla DFEM to work affrtrabr ly with 000peratinp employers to review hirclg and recruiting prachoes.in order to expand equal opporkaiily. • protd0its harassment of empbyeea or apptitams and requires emplayera to take all reasonable steps to prevent harasernera. REMEDIES To MWIDUALS, OR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION MAY INCLUDE: birlit7r back paYr promotion, reinatateeient, esaee- and -deabt order, or a fins. JOB APPUCANTS AND E1APLOYEE& If you believe yea" exPorienced dberinthellon, WEN wW im esllode wahoot coif to yca. For Info maflOfl contact ft nearest office of ft DepaMient of Fan Enpby reef and BAKRSRBO R CBNTRO ARIA 11REM LOS ANCOU 1001 T. Way, a 250 (619) 333-7620 11940 iir - h6A 0120 .322 wwa Five Lror, 92126 llvki.wAald, CA 97709 wrU6 w vwir Fwrr. CA 93721 r Apdes, CA 90012-0112 (1103) 795.2726 Sow D:pe Di in ON's (200) 665.3773 (213)6M2610 110 Weis C Srw.w, a 1702 =0 (313) 620J100 ..0hep r00wy ~ koW. wi. Far iepiw eewee 6w rmea DFRN aNim. Saw Oiw. CA 92101 - ` OAKLAND 1111 Jodk Shrr, a 5000 Ooklewd. CA 94607 14151464-4095 SAC A~G 2000 "O" Swear. 8120 Sawwwwrw,.CA 95616 (916) 443-9916 TDO (916) 226.16711 SUN ORNARD010 SAN DIM .375 W. K"ONAp Lww, 0220 110 wrrw C Seats, a 1702 Son airwwdiwa, CA 93608 San Diva, CA 92101 (716) 3113-4711 (610) 237.7603 SAN FRANCISCO SA/N. JOSS SANTA ANA - VBRWA 30 Vow New A.ree, 3rd Flew 111 N. h1wker Swear, #$t0 29 Gm C� Rasa, a 5311 5720 Raleww Shaw, a 30 San Frawriee, CA 96108 Sew Jar, G 95113 Sonya Awe, CA 93701 Von%", CA 93008 (615) 557.2005 (608) 277-1266 (716) SS&4159 (00) 0344513 The neKe w.a a ewnpkv wif Pwb6 w k.v q ern¢ eve *..Pk • kurl•ri. keOrA, w wepb7w,.w op•'w7 ..0hep r00wy ~ koW. wi. Far iepiw eewee 6w rmea DFRN aNim. DFEM 162 (Rev. 2/89) Sme am Federal Errpbyewrrt Pastas available eredty ndm,G. Neil Cowes. P.O. Bm 350630. Fan Lauderdale. Fbrida 33335. CAD T60 Fns 14MM11.91i1. .ww 19 WORKFORCE UTILIZATION ANALYSIS The purpose of a workforce utilization analysis is to identify the specific areas within the City of San Luis Obispo workforce in which women and minority group members are under- utilized in comparison to their availability within the relative labor market. The City's workforce is composed of eight occupational categories: Official /Administrator, Professional, Administrative Support, Technician, Para- professional, Service /Maintenance, Skilled Craft, and Protective Services. In addition, each of the occupational categories consist of a number of job groups. Job groups are classifications that have similar job content, skill level, promotional opportunities, or compensation.. Affirmative Action goals and timetables are established in those instances where the utilization of protected group members employed by the City is less than their availability within the relative labor market. A workforce utilization analysis is prepared on an annual basis by the Personnel Department, and appropriate recommendations made to the City Council, City Administrative Officer and all department heads for Affirmative Action goals and timetables to remedy problem areas. Affirmative Action goals and timetables are recommended for all occupational categories in which women or minority group members are employed at levels that are below labor market availability. The City has determined that for the majority of recruitments the relevant labor markets for the purposes of the Affirmative Action Plan will be the County of San Luis Obispo. Occasionally different labor markets will be utilized depending upon the minimum standards of the specific position. The figures show that the available labor force is close to census parity. These figures do NOT indicate if the available minority and female populations possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities to be employed by the City. The following identifies the under- utilization of females, Hispanics, Blacks, and other minorities (American Indian, Asian, Pacific Island, etc.) in City employment by job category as defined in the 1990 E.E04 report (please see the following pages): 20 O 9 m d w 7 a v a a m c m V m CL m 9 m O 6 Cal I A N m •O V AN V > e � m d � Ln Qi r 9 Ll m 9 , m Z O Ifl Q t r 1!i 0 m =c� W m Z ° a C t a vo �C V y m 0 m Q �. d � 0 n E W r c m v a° e wo O 7 0o00oo 000000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 10 � '� a � t7 4 0 a E O N � � �e a c c c c c c c C c c C N C c C. c c c c 000001! maNp)00 G .-'7 N7 ' 17 17 COCOON C O 0000001 r'aNm00 a� O N v00000 O O O O O n R N O m cc 10 m +N.- N O O O O O P � a N CO 0 0 a� coo O N m OI PJ� 000 l` ��N fD00 N W N+ N 1 ' 0000 o000 000000 m00000 �0000 n�0000 o�ooeo mee�eo �ooeo �n�0000 o�0000 m00000 o�000 Ago. -oo 00000 meo�oo 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0o00oo 000000 000000 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 10 � '� a � t7 4 0 a E O N � � �e a c c c c c c c C c c C N C c C. c c c c 000001! maNp)00 G .-'7 N7 ' 17 17 COCOON C O 0000001 r'aNm00 a� O N v00000 O O O O O n R N O m cc 10 m +N.- N O O O O O P � a N CO 0 0 a� coo O N m OI PJ� 000 O O O O O N m N 00 cc 000001r � a N CO cc LO N e cc 100, W n N O O O O 'N00000 mN�N�.000 aNaOr'00 al"10�000 m17�0000 f0 u m ° e C o r° ° O m ° j. V m> 7 T 7 °> 9 m c p C p 0 C m 0 C a CL y° a o° °° ° _2' E O o `o E w _ p o E u o E p m E a C ,La o f i[ c 2 r m W e 'a JC C c W o E Y C m W m E C 4 W a o is c 'c r. E m n v a `o o n p_ `o ° t(j n E n. a m `e r m E ni n m L :° E m m m E r o 0 o m° m E o m °° m E 0 0 0 —° =° m¢¢ O o H LL Tc 0 4c 1.0 12 A 4 A o 0. 1.. ro Q¢ O o. t- LL x m¢¢� 21 m�NN.00 ��N fD00 N W N+ N 1 ' q + 000001r 0000 �aN000 '• NOD a 0 V 111 N. O N a� a� N m m 1000. Nm0 00 000 V O O O O O N m N 00 cc 000001r � a N CO cc LO N e cc 100, W n N O O O O 'N00000 mN�N�.000 aNaOr'00 al"10�000 m17�0000 f0 u m ° e C o r° ° O m ° j. V m> 7 T 7 °> 9 m c p C p 0 C m 0 C a CL y° a o° °° ° _2' E O o `o E w _ p o E u o E p m E a C ,La o f i[ c 2 r m W e 'a JC C c W o E Y C m W m E C 4 W a o is c 'c r. E m n v a `o o n p_ `o ° t(j n E n. a m `e r m E ni n m L :° E m m m E r o 0 o m° m E o m °° m E 0 0 0 —° =° m¢¢ O o H LL Tc 0 4c 1.0 12 A 4 A o 0. 1.. ro Q¢ O o. t- LL x m¢¢� 21 0 m 0 CL Im d a 7 V a m r m CL m i 9 m 9' O r a �to to W C C 'E m o V To y V0 m a o C7 r t0 C r Ln W W T. W r V to a lb m Z -5 o Cs S C m � 7 C Q CL �(A vo m �O Cm O �m 0 om a 9 T m O O. E W C m Z C O a m •O m O m 7 U O � 0 0 0 0 W O O O O O 9400000 O 0 0 0 0 s► 0 0 0 0 N o e 0 o o �a C 000000 l9 x'0000 N00000 ' > a 9 m O O O O O.O O "cocoa N O o 0 0 o m . m C m O C 'c a e c 9 0 m e N°° ° C C C C C C C C C C a t m m 0 a yt�R�RCor. ococor. . 0 0 0 0 O ti nQNwoo O O O O O r .- mNr;oo 0cccc) ^ a N m � n , o NW 10 m r t m V r O O O O o P ��Nm00 �a.N m00 n 0 o0 00 m W OOi .a m n f- e09 a N O O O N O N O O r Q O W W a 0 m o O L 0 C O O ° Q Q N t O C C 0 O C 9 T a . C e> 7 O C m _ C e 6 C O : E o e E v o ° C E ° ° C o `o v o ° o° oe. u o 0 0 o w o c u 'S e° p r °° t $ e° p y e 9 n ° F106f O af•�SmQQO Mf�iOZaQQ� c 22 i GOALS AND TIMETABLES Affirmative Action Plan goals and timetables are flexible numerical objectives, based on the availability of protected group members in the relevant labor market that reflect the anticipated results of diligent good faith efforts applied to the hiring and advancement of protected group members. Used as such, goals and timetables are an appropriate measure of Affirmative Action progress. The goals used in the Affirmative Action Plan for the City of San Luis Obispo are based on the availability of protected group members in the relevant labor market. These employment goals represent a reasonable objective that the City of San Luis Obispo and its operating departments shall seek to achieve. The goals and timetables reflect the City's commitment to a rate of employment that is at least equal to the availability of women and minority group members in the relevant labor markets. Affirmative Action goals will be reviewed and updated on an annual basis by the Affirmative Action Committee and appropriate recommendations made to the City Council, City Administrative Officer and all department heads to remedy problem areas. The Affirmative Action Officer will review and update the City's workforce statistics to assess the extent to which annual Affirmative Action goals and timetables are being achieved. Equal Employment Opportunity efforts and Affirmative Action results will be incorporated into the annual objectives and performance evaluations of all department heads and supervisors. 23 0 Access California California Men's Colony City of Paso Robles 49 Del Sol Court Personnel Office Personnel Department San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 P.O. Box 8101 1030 Spring Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93409 Paso Robles, CA 93446 Allan Hancock College CALTRANS City of Santa Ana Job Placement Career Ctr. P.O. Box 8114 20 Civic Center Plaza 800 S. College San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8114 M -24, P.O. Box 1988 Santa Maria, CA 93454 Santa Ana, CA 92.702 Atascadero, State Hospital Candelaria City of Irvine Personnel Office American Indian. Council Attn: City Clerk P.O.. Box "A' P.O. Box 8110 1 Civic Center Plaza Atascadero, CA 93423 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8110 Irvine, CA 92714 Bakersfield Community College CCC Academy City of Lompoc Student Placement P.O. Box 5027 Personnel Department 1801 Panorama Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 100 Civic Center Plaza Bakersfield, CA 93305 Attn: Terri Dinuvant Lompoc, CA 93438 CA State University at Chico CCWA -Attn: Sgt. Lopez City of Pismo Beach Placement Office 7165 Sombrilla Avenue Personnel Department Chico, CA 95926 -0700. Atascadero, CA 93422 1000 Bello Avenue Pismo Beach, CA 93449 CA State Polytechnic Central Neuro Behavior Ctr. City of Hesperia University at San Luis Obispo Attn: Rick Holliday Personnel Department Placement Center 3000 Colima Rd. P.O. Box 2966 San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Atascadero, CA 93422 Hesperia, CA 92345 CA State Polytechnic City of LawndaleL City of Chino University at San Luis Obispo Community Information Officer Attn: Joanie Personnel Department 14717 Burin Ave. 13220 Central Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Lawndale, CA 96260 Chino, CA 91710 Cal Poly State University City of Soledad City of Bakersfield Disabled Student Service P.O. Box 156 Personnel Department Student Union 102 Soledad, CA 93960 1501 Truxton Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 Bakersfield, CA 93301 California Conservation Corps. City of Santa Maria City of Atascadero San Luis Obispo Center 110 East Cook Street Personnel Department P.O. Box 1380 Santa Maria, CA 93454 -5190 P.O. Box 747 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Atascadero, CA 93422 California Conservation Corps. City of Santee City of Morro Bay . Attn: Vince Cimino Personnel Department Personnel Department 1430 Capitol Avenue 10765 Woodside Avenue 595 Harbor Street Sacramento,. CA 95814 Santee, CA 92071 1 Morro Bay, CA 93442 24 ., City of Grover Beach County of Yuba ECOS .,. Personnel Department Job Development.& 154 S. 8th Street 825 9th Streeti...S Training 101 W. Branch #2 uite C y Arroyo Grande, CA 93454 Grover Beach, CA 93433 Marysville, CA'95901 City of Vista Cuesta College Employment Development Dept. Personnel Department Personnel Office 835 Park Street 600 Eucalyptus P.O. Box 8106 Paso Robles, CA 93446 Vista, CA 92083 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100 City of Moreno Valley Cuesta College Employment & Training Human Resources Department Disabled Student Services 218 West Carmen Ln., Suite 209 P.O. Box 1440 P.O. Box J Santa Maria, CA 93454 Moreno Valley, CA 92257 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 City of Lompoc Cuesta College EOC Homeless Shelter 100 Civic Center_ Plaza Leaming Skills - Dana Gough Attu: Susan Howe, P.O. Box 8001 P.O. Box 8106 736 Orcutt Lompoc, CA 93438 -8001 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8106 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 City of Fresno Department of Rehabilitation Experience Unlimited Personnel Department State of California P.O. Box.239 2348 Mariposa St. 2236 S. Broadway, Suite E Sacramento, CA 95823 -9000 Fresno, CA 93721 Santa Maria, CA 93454 -7800 City of Arroyo Grande Dept. of Rehabilitation Filipino Women's Club Personnel Department 3232 S. Higuera St., #101 885 S. 13th Street 214 E. Branch St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 -6925 Grover City, CA 93443. . Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 City of Morgan Hill. - Director of Affirmative Action Golden.State Schools 17555 Peak Avenue Personnel Office 402 Franel Road Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Cal Poly State University Santa Maria, CA 93454 Attn: Human Resources Office San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 City of Salinas E.D.D. House of Prayer. Personnel Department P.O. Box 8110 811 El Capital Way 200 Lincoln Avenue_ San. Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -8100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Salinas, CA 93901 Coast Rehabilitation Services E.D.D. Human Resources Department 2950 De La Vina St.,. Suite #5 116 Franklin Lane San Mateo County Santa - Barbara, CA 93105 Mike Mac Farland 590 Hamilton Street Redlands, CA 92373 Redwood City, CA 94063 Colombia College Career Cntr. E.O.C. Humbolt State. University. Yosemite Community College Dist. Personnel Office Job Development Specialist P.O. Box 1849 880 Industrial Way Student Employment Office Colombia, CA 95310 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Arcata, CA 95521 25 J. Groshart Vocational Monterey City Library Research & Development�J San Ardo Branch P.O. Box 926 P.O. Box 192 Santa Ynez, CA 93460 San Ardo, CA 93450 Job Agency of Santa Barbara P.O. Box 92255 Santa Barbara, CA 93290 -2255 Job Services P.O. Box 8110 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 Kern County Personnel 1120 Golden State Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 La Verne Public Library 3640 D Street La Verne, CA 91750 Larsen & Benchman Vocational Rehab. Services 669 Pacific, Suite G San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Los Angeles Pierce College Attn: Student Employment 6102 Win6etka Avenue Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Manning Rehabilitation Services 5301 Office Park Drive, #125 Bakersfield, CA 93309 -0652 Mattison Vocational Services P.O. Box 746 Los Olivos, CA 93309 -0652 Mexican - American Opportunity Foundation 2000 28th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 North County Women's Resource Center P.O. Box 2155 Atascadero, CA 93423 Oceano Community Services Dist. P.O. Box 599 Atascadero, CA 93445 Office of Employee Services A -8 County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 207 San Diego, CA 92102 PACE 9625 Black Mt. Rd., Suite 305 San Diego, CA 92126 PIC -V Santa Barbara County 218 West Carmen Lane, Suite 209 Santa Maria, CA 93454 Private Industry Council 3566 S. Higuera, Suite 100 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Private Industry Council 21720 S. Wilmington Ave. #308 Carson, CA 90810 Attn: Beverly Barbed Rehabilitation Group Inc. 1332 De La Vina St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101 -3121 Robin V. Harter Auditor - Controller's Office 4080 Lemon Street, 11th Floor Riverside, CA 02501 -3652 26 Sacramento Municipal Util. Dist. Outplacement Center Mail Stol 133 Department G.A., P.O. Box 1583( Sacramento, CA 96852 -1830 San Bernardino Public Library 555 West Sixth Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 San Luis Obispo City /County Library P.O. Box 8107 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 San Diego State University Career Planning & Placement 5300 Campanile Drive San Diego, CA 92182 San Luis Obispo County Personnel Department County Government Ctr., Rm. 38. Santa Maria Public Library 420 South Broadway Santa Maria, CA 93454 Santa Barbara Business College 303 E. Plaza Drive Santa Maria, CA 93454 Attn: Barbara Deanor SEIU Local 817 11555 Los Osos Valley Rd., A -7 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SLOCEA P.O. Box 3915 San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 -999, Social Services 1523 Longbranch Grover Beach, CA 93443 Springfield Baptist Church 2747 Broad Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 St. Luke Missionary Baptist Church 160 Brook Street San Luis Obispo, Ca 93401 State of California Employment Development Dept. 304 West Carmen Lane Santa Maria; CA 93454 Sunkist library 840 N. Puente Avenue La Puente, CA 01744 Veterans' Service Office Veterans' Memorial Building 801 Grand Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Veterans' Service .Office County of San Mateo 274 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 West Coast University P.O. Box 6088 Lompoc, CA 93437 -3088 Women's Resource Center 1009 Morro Street #201 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 WYRC Vocation a_I Consultants 11555 Los Osos Valley Rd. Suite A -3 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Yamada Vocational Services 11555 Los Osos Valley Road, #C San Luis Obispo, ",CA 93405 Yuba College 2088 North Beal Road Marysville, CA 95901 27 1'�) 02 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO POSITION TITLES and EEO JOB CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT Assistant City Administrator City Administrative Officer Administrative Analyst Administrative Secretary Executive Secretary (Confidential) ATTORNEY'S OFFICE City Attorney . Assistant City Attorney Legal Secretary (Confidential) CITY CLERK City Clerk Assistant City Clerk Council Secretary Office Assistant 1, II Secretary I FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Director Accounting Manager Information Systems Coordinator Revenue Manager Accounting Supervisor Computer Systems Technician Customer Services Supervisor Accounting Assistant II, III Administrative Secretary Office Assistant I PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT Personnel Director Personnel Analyst Risk Manager Work Health Coordinator Executive Secretary (Confidential) Personnel Assistant II (Confidential) 28 Officials /Administrators Officials /Administrators Professional Administrative Support Administrative Support Officials /Administrators Professional Administrative Support Officials / Admiinistrators Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support Officials /Administrators Professional Professional Professional Technician Technician Technician Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support Officials /Administrators Professional Professional Professional Administrative Support Administrative Support COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Director of Community Development Administrative Analyst Advance Planning Manager Assistant Planner Associate Planner Chief Building Official Current Planning Manager Building Inspector Building Permit Coordinator Graphics Technician Zoning Investigator Coordinator Office Assistant II Secretary II Senior Administrative Secretary PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director of Public Works City Engineer Administrative Analyst Arborist Engineering Field Supervisor Parking Manager Parks & Building Manager Supervising Civil Engineer Streets Manager Transit Manager Transportation Planner Building Maintenance Supervisor Building Maintenance Technician Engineering Assistant Engineering Technician Field Engineering Assistant Parking Enforcement Officer Parks Maintenance Technician Parks Supervisor Pool Maintenance Technician Public Works Inspector Streets Project Coordinator Streets Supervisor Supervising Mechanic Senior Administrative Secretary Office Assistant .I Secretary I, II Heavy Equipment Mechanic 29 Officials /Administrators Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional Technician Technician Technician Technician Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support Officials /Administrative Officials /Administrative Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional Professional .Professional Professional Professional Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support Skilled Craft PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) Heavy Equipment Operator I, II Skilled Craft Signal Maintenance Electrician Skilled Craft Janitor 11, III Service /Maintenance Maintenance Worker I, II, III Service /Maintenance Street Painter Service /Maintenance Tree Trimmer 1, II Service /Maintenance UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Utilities Director Officials /Administrators Administrative Analyst Professional Solid Waste Coordinator Professional Utilities Engineer Professional Wastewater Division Manager Professional Water Division Manager Professional Water Conservation Coordinator Professional Industrial Waste Coordinator Technician Pretreatment Technician. Technician Telemetry & Instrumentation Technician Technician Wastewater Collection Supervisor Technician Water Distribution Supervisor Technician Water Laboratory Technician Technician Water Reclamation Facility Supervisor Technician Water Reclamation Laboratory Technician I, II Technician Water Reclamation Maintenance Technician Technician Water Supply Supervisor Technician Water Treatment Plant Supervisor Technician Senior Administrative Secretary Administrative Support Utility Worker 11, III Skilled Craft Water Reclamation Facility Operator Trainee, I, 11, III Skilled Craft Water Service Worker 11, III Skilled Craft Water Supply Operator 11, III Skilled Craft Water Treatment Plant Operator II, III Skilled Craft Maintenance Worker I, II Service /Maintenance RECREATION Recreation Director Officials /Administrators Principal Recreation Supervisor Professional Parks Planner Professional Golf Course Supervisor Technician Recreation Supervisor Technician Recreation Coordinator I, II Para- Professional Maintenance Worker II Service /Maintenance 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Chief Police Captain Police Lieutenant Support Services Manager Communications Supervisor Communications Technician Crime Prevention Coordinator Evidence Technician Police Field Services Technician Police Records Supervisor Police Officer Police Sergeant I Administrative Secretary Police Records Clerk I, II Secretary II Janitor II FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Chief Fire Battalion Chief Fire Captain (Suppression) Fire Marshal /Battalion Chief Fire Protection Specialist Fire Inspector Fire Plan Check Inspector Graphics Technician Hazardous Materials Coordinator Public Education Specialist Fire Engineer Firefighter Administrative Secretary Secretary II Fire Vehicle Mechanic 31 Officials /Administrators Professional Professional Professional Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Protective Service Protective Service Administrative Support Administrative Support Administrative Support . Service/ Maintenance Officials /Administrators Professional Professional Professional Professional Technician. Technician Technician Technician Technician Protective Service Protective Service Administrative Support Administrative Support Service /Maintenance 8632 1. RESOLUTION NO. (199,1 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION TO REQUIRE A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A 42 -ACRE ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSED ALONG LOS OSOS VALLEY ROAD BETWEEN MADONNA ROAD AND HIGHWAY 101 (FROOM RANCH) ANNX/R/ER 80 -95 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, as follows: SECTION 1. Finding s. The Council, after consideration of the appellant's statement, the environmental determination of the Community Development Director, staff recommendations and reports thereon, makes the following finding: 1. It can be fairly argued on the basis of substantial evidence, as discussed in the initial study (ER 80 -95), that the project may have -a significant environmental effect. Therefore, an Envirommnetal Impact Report and not a Negative Declaration is required consistent with Section I5064(g)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 2. Action. The appeal of the Director's determination to require preparation of a focused environmental impact report is hereby denied. On motion of Roal n an seconded by Smith and on the following roll call vote: AYES: . Council limbers Roali an, Smith and N.ayor Settle NOES: Council riembers Romero and 1,7illiams ABSENT: idone the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 41h day of February , 1996 yor Alien Settle 1lIT v—:k F onnie GaA Clerl� g P62' _ J Draft resolution denying the appeal ER 80 -95 Page 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ?6y 06orney RESOLUTION NO. 8631 (1997 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 1827 WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning vesting Tract 1827, as contained in Resolution No. 6723 (1989 Series), and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has approved certain modifications to the approved tentative map, requested by the Subdivider, finding that the modifications are in substantial conformance with the approved tentative map, which provide for: 1) A "planned unit development" containing 15 individual residential lots and 2 common lots, in lieu of 18 air -space condominium units on one common lot. 2) Arrangement of the lots to preclude the need for abandonment of a portion of Bishop Street and acquisition of offsite compensating right of way, pursuant to the above- mentioned resolution and WHEREAS, the appropriate fees have been received by the City, listed in the attached Subdivision Agreement, marked Exhibit A, and WHEREAS, all other conditions required per said Resolution No. 6723 (1989 Series) have been bonded for and/or otherwise satisfactorily met, as noted in the said subdivision agreement. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the final map for Tract No. 1827 has been found to be in "substantial conformance" with the vesting tentative map and final map approval is hereby granted. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the subdivision agreement. On motion of Council Mer.+ber Smith seconded by council pjmd,ex Uzi 11 iamS and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council 11.!er rs Smith, williams, Poa]ran, Romero and mayor, Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None R -8631 r Resolution No. (1997 Series) Page two the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 4th 1997. ATTEST: Approved as orgenson DevRev \ ... \t1827 final map.rep day of February IF; ror �r off SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is dated this 5th day of February by and between RICHARD PORTER AND JENNIFER PORTER, herein referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred to as the "City." RECITALS REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a description of which is shown on the Final Map of'-Tract 1827, City of San Luis Obispo, Califomia, as approved by the City Council on the _-_. day of 3199 The Subdivider desires that said Tract No. 1827 be accepted and approved as a Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis Obispo (Title 17 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to install the improvements as set forth on the plans therefore. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct and install the following subdivision improvements in accordance with said subdivision regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, to wit: 1. CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS 2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING 3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the property line and water services to the curb stop. 4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 5. ORNAMENTAL METAL ELECTROLIERS 6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the .inspection 1 r--1 LM.I and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be required to file a letter stating that the developer has properly installed all facilities to be provided by him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to residents upon request. 7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City regulations. All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated and to the plans and specifications on file and approved by said City Engineer. The lines and grades for all of said improvements shall be established by the Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and specifications. The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above improvements shall begin within thirty (30) days from the date of recording of the final map, and that the work shall be completed within twelve (12) months of said recording date, unless an extension has been granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work is delayed by acts of God or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the Subdivider shall have an additional period of time equivalent to such period of delay in which to complete such work. Any extension of time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the Improvement Security filed pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California. No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date of the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public improvements unless specifically approved by the City. The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the Planning Commission and/or the City Council and has paid the necessary fees as indicated on the attached. Exhibits 1 and 2. The restoration of lost section comers and retracement of section lines within the Subdivision shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California. 2 a a The Subdivider attaches. hereto, as an integral part hereof, and as security for the performance of this agreement, an instrument of credit or bond approved by and in favor of the City of San Luis Obispo, and conditional upon the faithful performance of this agreement. Said instrument of credit or bond is in the amount of $ 24,400.00 which is the amount of the estimated cost of said improvements. Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects in the improvements arising from faulty workmanship or materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring within twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with* Sections 66499.7 and 66499.9 of the Govemment Code of the State of California, upon final, completion and acceptance of the work, City will release all but 10% of the improvement security, that amount being deemed sufficient to guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a period of one year following the completion and acceptance thereof. Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted, accept said improvements according to said plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said improvements or waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement. If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the Subdivider agrees that City may, at its option, declare the instrument of credit or bond which has been posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the proceeds to complete said improvements, or city may complete said improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his surety. The Subdivider agrees to deposit with the City a labor and materials bond in the amount of 50% of the above described subdivision improvements in accordance with State law. Said Subdivider has paid the sum of $ 1,025.00 for the City to inspect installation of said 3 subdivision improvements; and verify that they have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo. Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivision," all plans and specifications on file with said City Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all other documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer are hereby referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of the Subdivider under this agreement. It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City hereto that this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and .assigns of the respective Parties to this agreement. It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful bidder's contract unit prices and total bid prices for all of the improvements herein referred to. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by- CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUBDIVIDER MAYOR Allen K Sett e FORM: eAdy G Jorgensen Dev- rev \tract7ms \t1827\subagm.t w LXIHBIT 1 TRACT 1827 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT 1. The subdivider has paid a water acreage fee of $3,678.98 2: The subdivider has. paid a water frontage charge to be reimbursed to the "Petra Group" of $6,016.58 for 283 ft of frontage on Bushnell. (Pursuant to a reimbursement agreement) 3. The subdivider has paid a water frontage fee to the City of $7,140.00 for the Florence frontage. 4. The subdivider has paid a sewer charge to;be reimbursed to the "Petra Group" of $2,936.69. (Pursuant to a reimbursement agreement) 5. The Subdivider has submitted a monumentation guarantee of $1,800.00 to cover the installation of survey monuments, in accordance: with the Subdivision Map Act:, Said deposit will be released to the Subdivider upon receipt by the City of a letter from the Engineer/Surveyor indicating he has completed the work and has been paid. 6. The subdivider has paid a Park4n -Lieu Fee of $ 23,885.00 7. The Subdivider has ' prepared Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) to be recorded with the map. 5 "BONDS" - IMPROVEMENTS:, EXHIBIT 2 TRACT 1817 FEE AND BOND LIST Amount 1. Faithful Performance (required prior to recordation) 100% Public Improvements & 15% Infl. & Contingency Off -Site Improvements $ 24,400.00 2. Labor & Materials (required prior to recordation) 50% of Faithful Performance Off Site Improvements $ 12,200.00 3. Monumentation Trust Deposit $ 1,800.00 FEES (PAID WITH FINAL MAP) A. Park -in -lieu Fee B. Sewer Fee (Reimbursement to Petra) C. Water line (Reimbursement to Petra) D. Water Acreage Fee (To City) W , �E. Water frontage (To City) �_n M oF: Plan Checking and Inspection Fees 0 1. Plan Checking Fee Amount Form /Surety Received �ot � �lqf (07 70 I I44 CD# rLg ? N9012- n 4 Account No. Received $23,885.00 420.55:222.522 l 2 dhPjos $ 2,936.00 �JDZot? L}Lti? ! 2 L7 1�S3t $ 6,016.58 4COt -L. 2 .('if. 53; $ 3,768.98 500.70.502.624 it o k ( $ 7,140.00 I"1,111-21k(a 1% 5M $ 750.00 100.55.210.462 2. Map Checking Fee $ 675 + 804 3. Construction Inspection Fee .$1,025.00 dR- rev\ft=- ms1t1827lsubagn -t o . c 0 0 6 8505H000 6 M Pd 3/27/90 Pd -4/90 & 10/96 $238 °5.00 F. ti ti Fe U I� �I H H m �} \� k % + §i §\ { \t Ekn,v ■ 10 SISY9 §b. ! / \ \ � $4 )§ ¥ 2 � � / R \ � \ � . �} \� k % + §i §\ { \t Ekn,v ■ 10 SISY9 §b. ! / \ \ � $4 )§ ¥ �� �:, �, � �� C�r�'� ���~� C 1 ,3 RESOLUTION NO. 8630 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO GRANT AN EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO SAN LUIS GARBAGE AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 4,1997 WHEREAS, public health and safety demand the orderly and periodic collection and disposal of solid waste from properties within the City of San Luis Obispo (City); and WHEREAS, it has been determined that an exclusive franchise granted to a private company is the most effective and efficient way to collect and remove solid waste with the City; and WHEREAS, the City has granted San Luis Garbage Company (Franchisee) an exclusive franchise for the collection and disposal of solid waste within the City; and WHEREAS, the Franchisee has provided solid waste services within the City for more than 45 years without interruption; and WHEREAS, at the January 3, 1995 the Council directed staff to re- negotiate a long term franchise agreement the Franchisee; and WHEREAS, City staff and San Luis Garbage Company have now developed the franchise agreement for the City Council's consideration to provide these services. This agreement contains the following key provisions: ■ Type: Exclusive ■ Term: Maximum 15 year term ■ Franchise fee: 6% of gross revenue ■ Agreement Highlights: • Semi- Annual clean-up weeks for single and multi- family properties • Flexibility to add or change solid waste collection programs • Periodic performance evaluations • Performance incentives • Improved reporting • Public education • CERCLA and Integrated Waste Management Act indemnification • Assignment of contract provisions D OrIn NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby declares: A public hearing will be held on March 4, 1997 at 7 pm in City /County Library community Room at which time it.is the intention of the City Council to grant up to a maximum 15 year franchise to San Luis Garbage Company. 2. Any persons having any interest in the franchise or any objection to the granting of the franchise may appear before the Council and be heard thereon. The City Clerk will publish this resolution at least once within fifteen days of its passage in a newspaper in the City of San Luis Obispo. Upon motion of Council M'Qmber Smith , seconded by Council 1-12rr r Williams , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council 13arbers Smith, Williams, Roalr.Nn, Romero and Mayor Settle NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 4th day of Feb_ ruary , 1997. Mayor Allen Settle ATTEST: C' Clerk Bo e.L. APPROVED AS TO FORM: V)7/0' .�. 01 ����� � l q /7 ,. �1 LUIS OBISPO COUNTY • 1b, ramAwi ribijne 3825 South Higuera a Post Office Box 112 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406 -0112 • (805) 781 -7800 In The Superior Court of The State of California In and for the County of San Luis Obispo AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION DV# 69635 -0 -7 City Of SLO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Luis Obispo I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of the SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY TELEGRAM- TRIBUNE, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily, Sundays excepted, at the City of San Luis Obispo in the above named county and state; that notice at which the annexed clippings is a true printed. copy, was published in the above -named newspaper and not in any supplement thereof - on the following dates, to-wit: February 15, 1997 that said newspaper was duly and regularly ascertained and established a newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of Cal'ifomia, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the provisions of Chapter 1, Division 7, Title of the Government Code of the State of Califomia. I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ( - `11 (,C� K__ Signature o rinclp I Clerk) Date: February 15, 1997 - clicyor San luls 08MM ESOLUTION 40.8630 (1997 Series) RESOLUTIONOFTHE ATy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS IISPO DECLARING THE CITY'S .INTENT TO -_ (RANT AN EXCLUSIVE. FRANCHISE,TO'SAN. LUIS GAR13AGE AND A PUBLIC FARING FOR MARCH 4, 1497 - WHEREAS, public :alth and safety demand e orderly and periodic �Ilection and disposal of, slid waste from proper - is within the City of San its Obispo (City); and WHEREAS, it has been nermined that an'exclu- we franchise granted to a ,ivate company is the Pat effective and effi- ant way to collect and (move solid waste with e City; and .WHEREAS, the City has - up weeks for single and multi - family properties • Flexibllity to add.or change solid waste collection programs - Periodic perform- .ance evaluations - Performances in- centives • Improved report ing , • . Public education •• CERCLA and Inte. grated Waste Man- agement Act indem- nification Assignment of con. tract provisions _NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, . that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby declares: 1. A public (tearing will be held, on March 4, 1997 at 7 pm in City/ County Library com- munity Room at which I time it is the intention of the City Council to grant up to a maxi. mum 15 year franchise to Sari Luis Garbage Company. - 2: Arty .persons having ction and disposal of �, any interest in the fran- waste within, the ,. chise or any Objection and - - I to the granting of the 1EREA%the Franahi- r franchise may appear has or solid 'before,theCouncil.and e services within the be heard thereon. for more than 45 3. The City Clerk will pub- s without interrup- lish this resolution at in; and., least once within fif- WHEREAS, at the.Janu- teen days of its pas -: y 3, 1995 .meeting, . the sage in a newspaper in; ouncil' directed staff to the City of. San Luis . i- negotiate a. long term Obispo. anchise agreement with • Upon motion of.Council' ie Franchlsee;�ancl Member Smith seconded WHEREAS, City staff by Council Member Wil- id San Luis 'Garbage (lams and on'the follow - ompany .have now de. ing roll call'vote: eloped the franchise AYES: Council Members greement for the City Smith, Williams, Roalmen, :ouncil's con-sideratin to Romero and Mayor Settle rovide these services. NOES: None. his agreement contains ABSENT,: None to following, key pfovi. the foregoing resolution ions: - was adopted this 4th-day • Type4xclusive of February, 1997.. • Term: Maximum 15,'/s /Mayor Allen Settle - yearterm. ATTEST: - I ■.Franchise fee:-5% of /s /BonnieL Gewf, gross.revenue City Clerk ■ Agreement High. Feb. 15,.1997 dM635 lights:: -;Semi- Annual clean' RESOLUTIONNO. op29 (1997 Series) ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY LEGISLATIVE ACTION PROGRAM AND PRIORITIES FOR 1997 WHEREAS, it is vital to the fiscal health and the self detemiination ofe City to effectively communicate with State Legislators and Federal representatives in order to favorably influence the adoption of State and Federal legislation, regulations and grant requests; and WHEREAS, the League of California Cities conducts .a legislative analysis and advocacy program on behalf of cities for State issues and major Federal issues; and WHEREAS, with four County supervisors representing different portions of the City, it is imperative that the City develop an improved system for regular communication with the Board of Supervisors, particularly concerning land use issues adjacent to the City, and WHEREAS, the City should continue to emphasize developing a positive relationship with North County Cities and agencies concerning water issues; and WHEREAS, the City desires to be proactive and involved in the governmental decision making processes directly affecting the City legislative priorities identified in Exhibit "A ", and other selected issues as may from time to time be recommended by the League of California Cities; and WI-MREAS, a key component of the City's Legislative Action Program is face- to-face meetings between City representatives and elected officials at the Federal, State, and in particular County levels, and coordination with similar efforts made by other local government entities. R-6629 E629 Resolution No. SE29 (1997) Page Two NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does hereby establish the Legislative Action Priorities for 1997, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A' , and authorizes staff to take positions on legislation generally consistent with the Legislation Action Priorities and such other resolutions and recommendations of the League of California Cities as may be from time to time presented to the City. Upon motion of Council kimber Will' I seconded by Vice Mayor Roa]ran . and on the following roll call vote Ayes: Council N,embers Williams, Roalmzn, Romero, Srith and Mayor Settle Noes: None Absent: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 21st day of January 1997. Mayor Allen Settle ATTEST: i J /a✓ I . .. EXHIBIT A: CITY LEGISLATIVE ACTION PRIORITIES FOR 19967 FEDERAL PRIORITIES • Requiring funding of federally mandated programs, including new water /wastewater regulations, or eliminating such mandates • Promoting continued and increased funding sources for transportation, especially transit • Obtaining new funding sources to expand low and moderate income housing • Supporting legislation to transfer ownership of Salinas Reservoir to the-4Camty -© €San -Luis Obispe, i€nesessafy a_ local agency for the purpose of facilitating the Salinas Dam Expansion Proiect • Supporting legislation on coastal preservation • Supporting legislation that provides regulatory relief to local government in complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act and overtime provisions for exempt employees • Supporting continued funding for the Land and Water Conservation Grant Program • Supporting legislation to exempt cities from liability for leakage of hazardous waste discharge to POTW's from sewer STATE PRIORITIES FINANCE • Balancing the State Budget without further losses to City revenues • Supporting efforts to protect the City for loss of.revenues due to State mandates • Supporting legislation that strengthens opportunities for local fiscal independence COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Opposing mandated State approval of local General Plan Elements, such as implementing and compliance with, State General Plan Housing element law • Promoting funding sources to encourage the retrofitting of unreinforced.masomy buildings PUBLIC SAFETY • Repealing legislation that requires cities to pay booking fees (SB 2557) • Preserving city's authority to investigate police misconduct • Preserving city's authority to establish emergency medical service levels • Increasing City authority to regulate group homes for juvenile offenders • Continuing support for disaster preparedness /earthquake awareness • Supporting grant requests for Regional Hazardous Material Response Team, disaster preparedness, and training facility • Supporting efforts to secure higher levels of cost recovery-for DUI's • Supporting efforts to expand the scope of parental responsibility for crimes committed by minors • Supporting efforts to provide the Governor with authority to override the parole board when anyone convicted of a violent offense is proposed to be released on parole Support- ing- efffxts -to- shear )line - and- irr3prove- SB-- I.082; -GUPA • Encourage the California Highway Patrol to improve traffic safety on the Highway 41=46 corridor through increased enforcement • Preserving the authority of local control on issuance of concealed weapons permits • Supporting a state -wide gaming commission to oversee all forms of gambling in the state • Supporting legislation which will return funding for the commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) back to its original format TRANSPORTATION • Changing Gas tax laws to allow local tax for transportation purposes based on a majority vote of the public (BSTF recommendation) • Increasing transportation funding (including transit, bicycles, others) especially transit • Encourage the Department of Transportation to improve traffic safety on the I- Eghway 41- 46 corridor through engineering solutions such as additional passing lanes, median barriers, etc. PERSONNEUENIPLOYEE RELATIONS • Further reforming Worker's compensation • Preserving the fiscal integrity of PERS • Opposing binding arbitration and expansion of the "Peace Officers' Bill of Rights" • Monitoring employee healthcare/benefit changes PUBLIC WORKS • Better defining "qualified" bidders in public contracts bidding • Redefining Prevailing wages as "average" local wages • Streamlining Federal and State process for funding street projects • Install median barriers on multi-lane segments of Hwy. 46 (Paso to Hwy. 41) • Increase to.$20 000 limits of work (from $5,000) for public projects not requiring competitive bidding PARKS AND RECREATION • Supporting recreational programming, particularly for "at risk" individuals within the City • Supporting funding for: protection of natural resources (e.g., the Mon: os), open space, and parks development • Supporting efforts to streamline regulatory requirements associated with child care and aquatic programs • Support funding for rehabilitation of urban parks • Support efforts at the State level for spark and open space bond measure `J T LITIES • Providing funding for reclaimed water programs • Supporting clean water grant programs • Supporting efforts to enhance local government's ability to comply with solid waste requirements • Supporting legislation to exempt cities from liability for leakage of hazardous waste discharged to POTW's from sewer • Supporting leWslation to amend the State Health and Safety Code to allow simultaneous use of lake Nacimiento for body contact recreation and domestic water sum y COUNTY PRIORITIES • Reaching agreement with the County and north county communities on solutions for Salinas Reservoir expansion and Nacimiento pipeline projects • Develop consistency between the City and County General Plans, particularly to emphasize the concepts that (1) urban development should be municipal, and (2) unincorporated areas shall remain rural, agricultural, or open space in character • Increasing local funding of the Transit Transfer Center • Retaining County offices in the downtown area • Improving regional solid waste management • Developing cooperative approaches for providing services on a regional basis • Effectively and cooperatively implementing the Community Development Bloc Grant Program • Support-StFearnlirting -and- e- onsolidating- hazardous -- materials- inspeeti&"er -rnit- -and -fee programs-at-the-local-level planning process • Discussing uses for the County- owned " aggaraa' adiacent to the Fremont Theater that are more consistent with the Downtown Plan and provide more contribution to the economic vitality of the downtown • Reselving- artnexation- tax - transfer - issues- {m- eonjumetion- with-other- cities }- withthe-C ty �'y ice; �,� � C'�o `� �� � �� �'�`�- ��� d RESOLUTION NO. 8E (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE/INSPECTION FEE FOR PROCESSING MASSASGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSES AND MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMITS AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 8433 (1995 SERIES) BY DELETING THE ANNUAL MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT AND TECHNICIAN RENEWAL FEE WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo established massage operation regulations contained in Chapter 5.56 of the Municipal Code to provide for the orderly regulation of massage establishments and massage technicians; and . WHEREAS, state law authorizes the City to recover administrative fees, inspection fees, and licensing fees; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo did hold a public hearing to consider amending the massage licensing procedure by deleting the annual renewal requirement and establishing an alternative licensing procedure, BE IT RESOLVED, by.the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Resolution No. 8433 (1 ' 995 Series) is hereby amended by rescinding the annual massage establishment and massage technician license renewal requirement and renewal fee. SECTION 2. The City of San Luis Obispo hereby establishes a non-refundable fee of $20.50 (twenty dollars and fifty cents) as an administrative/inspection fee for the processing of address changes to massage licenses and permits requiring an inspection. SECTION 3. This fee will be effective concurrent with Ordinance No. (1997 Series), and will be adjusted annually on July I of each year by the annual percentage change in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (or successor agency) consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) all-cities average for the prior calendar year. Upon motion of Council Member Williams seconded by council I-SmTber Romero and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Ilembers Williams, Romero, Roalrian, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES:'- None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 21st day of January .1997. mmf I � Resolution No. 862' (1997 Series) Page No. 2 Cr APPROVED AS TO FORM: W iCl • ii!i ai : r H� yof . 4� RESOLUTION NO. 8627 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE OF LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT FUNDS AND APPROVING A 10% MATCH FROM THE GENERAL FUND WHEREAS, the Omnibus Fiscal Year 1996 Appropriations Act, Public Law 104134, provides funds for the implementation of the Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program to be administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance WA), U: S. Department of Justice; and WHEREAS, based on population, the City of San Luis Obispo is eligible to apply for the amount of $47,915.00 from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program; and - WHEREAS, as part of the application process; an advisory board was established to review the application for funding, and has made nonbinding "recommendations for the use of fluids by the City of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 21, 1997, to receive public input on the recommendations of the advisory board; BE TT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approves the expenditure of $47,915.00 of Local Law Enforcement Block. Grant funds for the purchase of equipment as recommended by the Chief of Police, approves the appropriation of 10% matching funds ($5,324.00) from the General Fund, and authorizes the City Administrative Officer to make all grant applications and to execute all grant related documents. Upon motion of Council Herber Williams , seconded by Council P e -ber Romero , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council M r�bers Williams, Rorero, Roalran, Srdth and mayor Settle NOES: None 00-1-10Z IliS'.T•T� the foregoing resolution was adopted this. 21st day of January , 1997,, ATTEST: / _ , v rty Clerk Boprre Mayor Allen k. ,Settle APPROVED AS TO FORM: I m/ ° en R -8627 �%,��� O 0 "fib RESOLUTIONWO. 8626 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE OF $979600 FROM THE 1996 STATE BUDGET TO ASSIST IN FUNDING THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPUTER PROJECT WHEREAS, with the adoption of the 1996 State budget, the legislature passed AB3229 which established the Supplemental Local.Law Enforcement Fund; and ViT EREAS, AB3229 appropriated $100 million to supplement local law enforcement budgets; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has received $97;600.00 from the 1996 California State budget as granted under AB 3229; and WI3EREAS, the funds may be applied to programs or projects which are in existing budgets but are under - funded; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 21, 1997, to receive public input on the recommendations for the use of these funds; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo approves the expenditure of $97,600.00 as received from the 1996 California State budget to assist in funding the Public Safety computer project, and authorizes the City Administrative Officer execute any grant related documents.. Upon motion e Council 2 er-ber Williams seconded by Council DTa -ber Fbrero and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council MErbers Vdilliaris, Pzirero, Poalrran, Sritn and Mayor Settle. NOES: None ABSENT:- None the foregoing resolution was adopted thisi 21st day of January 199,7 A T Vf . APPROVED AS TO FORM: I M51 R. 8626 i { RESOLUTION NO. 6625 (1997 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADJUSTING SALARY RANGES FOR APPOINTED OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OTHER MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to a comprehensive policy that strengthens the recruitment and retention of well qualified and effective appointed officials and management personnel; and WHEREAS, in 1996 the City Council established the Management Pay for Performance System; and WHEREAS, that system provides that the City Council annually may adjust the salary ranges; and WHEREAS, the Council is committed to a compensation plan which reflects the differences between duties, responsibilities and job requirements; and WHEREAS, the Council determines that merit and performance shall be the sole basis for Appointed Official and Management compensation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby modifies the Management.Pay for Performance System as follows: SECTION 1. The salary schedule for Appointed Officials, Department Heads and other Management Employees shall reflect a 3% increase in salary ranges as shown in Exhibit "A" SECTION 2. The Appointing Authority, or City Administrative Officer shall determine compensation within the designated range, after evaluating performance in accordance with the Management Pay for Performance System. SECTION 3. The City shall continue to provide employees in those classifications listed in Section 1 certain fringe benefits as set forth in Resolution No. 8412 (1995 Series) and Resolution No. 8476 (1996 Series) and will increase the life insurance coverage for Department Heads to $100,000 and for all other management personnel to $50,000. SECTION 4. The City shall report to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) the 7% employee contribution as income for the purposes of calculating retirement benefits in accordance with the "Employer Paid Member ContnbutiorT or EPMC option at no cost to the City. Upon motion of Council Meriber Williams , seconded by A i me P.'a�znr -Poa 1 rgn , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council ilsrn s Nilliams, Romero, Smith and Mayor Settle NOES: Vice Mayor Roalmn ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 21st day of January R -8625 Resolution Pao. 8625 97 Series) Page Twu ATTEST: City Bo APPROVED i/ /fir. 4 :��� ' :� Mayor ADen Settle 1 � I � APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE Salary Grouo Classifications City Administrative Officer 11 City Attorney III Assistant City Administrative Officer Community Development Director Finance Director Fire Chief Police Chief Public Works Director Utilities Director IV City Engineer Parks and Recreation Director Personnel Director V City Clerk VI Assistant City Attorney Development Review Manager Long Range Planning Manager Public Works Manager Wastewater Division Manager Water Division Manager VII Accounting Manager Chief Building Official Economic Development Manager Fire Marshall Information Systems Manager Natural Resources Manager Revenue Manager Supervising Civil Engineer VIII Assistant to the CAO Parking Manager Principal Transportation Planner Risk Manager Transit Manager Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor Water Treatment Plant Supervisor Utilities Engineer EXHIBIT A Salary Rance $7046 -9138 $6108 -7908 $5749 -7413 $5142 -6606 $4116 -5351 $4033 -5311 $3700 -5086 $3398 -4761 Management Salary Schedule - Page 2 IX Administrative Analyst $3160 -4490 Fire Protection Specialist GIS Coordinator Industrial Waste Coordinator Neighborhood Services Manager Personnel Analyst Principal Recreation Supervisor Wastewater Collection Supervisor Water Distribution Supervisor Water Supply Supervisor X Accounting Supervisor $2922 -4144 Arborist Building Maintenance Supervisor Communications Supervisor Customer Services Supervisor Golf Course Supervisor Parks Supervisor Police Records Supervisor Police Support Services Manager Recreation Supervisor Streets Supervisor Supervising Mechanic Water Conservation Coordinator �� � � � `y`l� � ,�' ��, �