HomeMy WebLinkAbout9350-9362® o
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
RESOLUTION NO. 9362 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A PORTION OF THE MORRO STREET
RIGHT OF WAY, BETWEEN PALM AND MONTEREY STREETS, IS UNNECESSARY
FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING
ITS ABANDONMENT, SUBJECT TO RESERVATION OF SPECIFIC EASEMENTS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with a public hearing duly held on September 3, 2002, pursuant
to Section 8300 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and a finding of General
Plan consistency, that this Council finds and determines that a portion of Morro Street, between
Palm and Monterey Streets, as described and shown on the map marked "Exhibit A ", attached
hereto and incorporated herein, is not necessary for present or future public street purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of said right -of -way subject to the
following:
1. Reservation of easements over the southwesterly 3.5 feet of the abandoned right of way for
public pedestrian and utilities purposes, as described and shown on said attached "Exhibit A ".
2. The abandonment shall not be effective until the City receives fee title ownership of the adjacent
northeasterly property.
3. Item 2 must be met within one (1) year of this date. Otherwise, this resolution will expire_ and
be null and void.
SECTION 3. Upon notification from the Director of Public Works to the City Clerk that the
condition prescribed in Section 3 has been met, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
Resolution of Abandonment, duly attested under the seal of the City, to be recorded in the Office .
of the San Luis Obispo County Recorder.
11%%r$$%
C 0
Resolution No. 9362 (2002 Series)
Page 2
On motion of Council Member Ewan, seconded by Vice Mayor Marx, and on the following
roll call vote,
AYES: Council Members Ewan and Schwartz, Vice Mayor Marx, and Mayor Settle
NOES: Council Member Mulholland
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopt,
ATTEST:
Lee Price, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WQW%A'tI _ i _
mey
i
Allen K. Settle
0
Oox
a)
m0Z
DNS
gu u:
m
Z m
0 O 0
�p
I
i
I
I
I
I
.I
1
I
f
I
25'
PALM STREET (so' R/w) j
i � _ = _ = —
.
■r
t
1
,
e
�
.1
13'
504
51/
0
N
t
W
N
zo
t
0
n m
c.
N Q
N H
°o
^+ K
G
C Q
N
h
w
0 v 4p,
k
...`
M
X
n
m
^z^
r�l
W
m
_x
ff
O
0
^O
a
O
A
0
0 p B, -�
R
r Sr
o Q. � Sr o
:0, o
m� O0
g Sr
_ c _ e r
0 0
(o ?
A O ,y. o
� � F
C9 M N
O CA 'o
°
so., o
-°n p ^
CO) H w ... 5
ti b y y 00
- ow
y
N w N Fr
F. cor
0
o�
Er
aq
oz
0
S." r
0
a
�e
0
O
S
N
.+ V♦
00
r
V
A
o �
0
z
a
b
PAT Ci'( �/ Of EXHIBIT A
"'�� r ` MORRO ST. ABANDONMENT '
SAn LUIS OBISPO BETWEEN PALM & MONTEREY STREETS
O
0 0
Recording requested by
and when recorded mail to:
City Clerk
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
RESOLU'T'ION NO. 9361 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT COURT STREET, BETWEEN MONTEREY
AND HIGUERA STREETS, IS UNNECESSARY FOR PRESENT OR PROSPECTIVE
PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES AND ORDERING ITS ABANDONMENT, SUBJECT TO
RESERVATION OF SPECIFIC EASEMENTS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. In accordance with a public hearing duly held on September 3, 2002, pursuant
to Section 8300 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and a finding of General
Plan consistency, that this Council finds and determines that Court Street, between Monterey and
Higuera Streets, as described and shown on the map marked "Exhibit A ", attached hereto and
incorporated herein, is not necessary for present or future public street purposes.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby orders the abandonment of said right -of -way subject to the
following:
1. Reservation of an easement over the southwesterly twenty -five (25) feet of the abandoned
right of way for public pedestrian access, public and private utilities, emergency access, ingress
and egress to buildings on the adjacent properties and private drainage purposes, and a "public"
drainage easement is reserved for that portion of the under -city culvert/bridge (San Luis Obispo
Creek) that lies within the abandonment area, as shown on said "Exhibit A ". The northerly line
of this easement is five (5) feet northerly of the existing outside wall of the culvert, and
"Reserving to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the right from time to time to install, maintain,
repair, operate, replace, remove and renew underground wires and other structures, equipment
and fixtures for the operation of said facilities within said easement"
2. All utility relocations, conversion of utilities from public to private, and meter relocations
shall be completed prior to recordation of abandonment, unless an agreement to construct the
necessary revisions and acceptable surety has been posted, to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Director, Utilities Director, Chief Building Official and affected utility companies.
R 9361
C
Resolution No. 9361 (2002 Series)
Page Two
3. Any building code upgrades required for the proposed abandonment and adjusted property
lines shall be reviewed, approved, permitted, and receive final inspection approvals, to the
satisfaction of the City prior to recordation.
4. The abandonment shall not be effective until the City has sold the adjacent northeasterly
property to the applicant.
5. Items 1 through 4 must be met within one (1) year of this date. Otherwise, this resolution will
expire and be null and void.
SECTION 3. Upon notification from the Director of Public Works to the City Clerk that the
conditions prescribed in SECTION 2 have been met, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy
of this Resolution of Abandonment, duly attested under the sea] of the City, to be recorded in the
Office of the San Luis Obispo County Recorder.
On motion of Council Member Ewan, seconded by Vice Mayor Marx, and on the following
roll call vote,
AYES: Council Members Ewan and Schwartz, Vice Mayor Marc, and Mayor Settle
NOES: Council Member Mulholland
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day's f Septem�002.
ATTEST:
Mayor Allen K. Settle
Lee Price, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
'•1
ty Attorney
OSOS STREET
OFFER OF OEDtCAT10N
FOR PUBUC ROAD
APN 002- 431 -005
MORRO STREET
TYAV r t A
SHEET 1 OF 2
f
f
APN 002 -431
F-
W
W
H
N
Q
W
w�
PROPERTY
UNE .
250 ACCRUES TO THE ADJACENT
PROPERTY M THE EAST OF THE R/W
15* ACCRUES TO THE ADJACENT
PROPERTIES TO THE WEST OF THE 50
City 0 f EXHIBIT A
y� t({r COURT STREET ABANDONMENT
Satn LVJS OB]sp BETWEEN MONTEREY & HIGUERA STREETS
O &F-ha>irt
Sheet 2 of 2
EXHIBIT A
COURT STREET ABANDONMENT
BETWEEN MONTEREY & HIGUERA STREETS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Parcel 1: Court Street, as set forth and delineated on the Map of the City of San Luis Obispo, County of
San Luis Obispo, State of California, according to map filed for record May 1, 1878 in Book A, Page 168
of Maps in the of the County Recorder of said County, lying between the southerly line of Monterey Street
and the northerly line of Higuem Street, as said Higuera Street was conveyed to the City of San Luis
Obispo by deed recorded January 11, 1890 in Book 7, page 5 of deeds.
Parcel 2: That portion of Block 17 in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of
California, according to the map thereof, recorded May 1, 1878 in Book A, at page 168 of Maps in the
Office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Court and Monterey Streets, as laid down on said map of San Luis
Obispo; thence, in a northerly direction along Monterey St. 10 feet; thence, in an easterly direction to the
Arroyo de San Luis Obispo; thence, down the said Arroyo to the southerly line of Court Street; thence
along Court Street, to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM; that portion lying southerly of
the northerly line of Higuera Street.
RESERVING THEREFROM, easements as shown and described in the body of the resolution.
� �ti� • O
c °° ���`
' � `,
�([[[',,, v��,, l
,��,�
u'
O
RESOLUTION NO. 9360 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM THE STATE WATER
RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD FOR THE WATER REUSE MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, the City's Water Reclamation Facility produces a tertiary reclaimed water
which is suitable for irrigation and other non - potable uses; and
WHEREAS, the City has the potential to expand the use of recycled water to other areas
throughout the city; and
WHEREAS, the State Water Resources Control Board provides water recycling planning
grants for studies associated with the reuse of treated wastewater.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Utilities Director or his
designee to sign and file, for and on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, a Water Recycling
Planning Grant Application for a grant from the State Water Resources Control Board in the
amount not to exceed $75,000 for a facilities planning study for the development of a Water
Reuse Master Plan.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby agrees and further does authorize the
aforementioned representative or his designee to certify that the City of San Luis Obispo has and
will comply with all applicable state statutory and regulatory requirements related to any state
grant funds received.
SECTION 3. The City Council further authorizes the Utilities Director or his designee
to negotiate and execute a grant contract and any amendments or change orders thereto on behalf
of the City of San Luis Obispo.
Upon motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Vice Mayor Marx, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Ewan, Mulholland, and Schwartz, Vice Mayor Marx,
and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 3rd day of September 2002.
R 9360
11
Resolution No. 9360 (2002 Series)
Page 2
ATTES
Lee Pnee,.CMC
City Clerk _.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/ ,
TA
omey
LI
� Ulf � v`'
1 � � ti�
,\W�jvl 1 �
`\ ���
• O
g30
Resolution No. 494-(2002 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
ROBERTI -Z- BERG - HARRIS (RZH) BLOCK (PER CAPITA) BOND ACT OF 2000
THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND
RECREATION
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the Robert- Z'Berg-
Harris, (RZH) Block Grant (Per Capita) Grant Program which provides funds to meet the urgent
need for sate, open and accessible local park and recreational facilities for increased recreational
opportunities that provide positive alternatives to social problems; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the
responsibility for the administration of the grant program, setting up necessary procedures; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State of California Department of Parks
and Recreation require the Applicants Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of
the Applicant to apply for the Per Capita Allocation, and
WHEREAS, the Applicant will enter into a Contract with the State of California;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Luis Obispo City
Council hereby:
1. Approves the filing of an Application for local assistance funds from the Roberti -
Z- Berg -Hams (RZH) Block Grant Program of 2000; and
2. Certifies that the Applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and
maintain the project; and
3. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands and agrees to the General
Provisions contained in the Contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and
4. Appoints the City Administrative Officer as agent of the City of San Luis Obispo
to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not
limited to applications agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on,
which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned projects.
R 9359
Resolution No. 9359 (200•Series)
Page 2
Upon motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Ewan, Marx, Mulholland, and Schwartz, and
Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 3' day of September 2002.
Mayor Allen K. Settle
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
•
• o
RESOLUTION NO. 9358 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PHASING SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City Council held a hearing on the proposed amendment on August 20,
2002; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined and the City Council
hereby concurs that the proposed amendment is not a project under the California Environmental
Quality Act, because it has no potential for physical changes to the environment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the
Residential Growth Management Regulations, specifically by:
Encouraging the timely production of housing, including affordable housing;
Allowing development consistent with land use designations, zoning, and approved
development plans, and subject to availability of resources and services; and
Maintaining a citywide population growth rate not exceeding an annual average of one
percent.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
The Residential Growth Management Phasing Schedule, most recently amended March 6,
2001, by Resolution No. 9161, is hereby amended as shown in the attached Exhibit A.
On motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland, and
on the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Council Members Mulholland, Schwartz, and Mayor Settle
Noes: None
Absent: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20t} ^ ^ ^^
R 9358
Resolution No. 9358 (2102 Series)
Page 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I wr IMM, MI jou" %"IF .
/ '
7
�
CD £ 222
2
>a >m�¥c
e
■ _
GaEU[E%
/
CL
c c CD
m
,
�� gE��o
■
[.= E 2 ƒ } ®
0 /§k0fa
FFkf §Ja&
/
Tr \ƒ�( }/
ƒ
¢
0 aeq=2CD
=3
3 =2C�■s
=aw -n
m
i CD
@ m = =, -,
a
:3 0 (D g
co w 0) £
0aUBEEa
%C \MqF�
�i*co
/
CD CD
=r0 0 0
°
=
ka'(D
2=r0M:3
%° -__
$
k\�Ilw
/
CD 00 2
mR��.G
0
SD »a
;x aam,
:3
CL
E�+2$NCL
@ 3
§ CD
"M °�dCD
k
=
KCa§Z §ƒ\
W
§#� �o
=G +6GAf
\
o
± - c -
DWCD o
e
®k
to
£ -� /2
CD
E l< CD
CD - m
,E+° EC
o
RgCL 0CD
CD CL �
cD§�t�RCL%
CC2o )
3(;223
P
2 \DMM
R §2{/
�__;�
3CD = =E
g
CL -��\
G
ƒ /
CD
R
ca
@
/
3
(D
L-A
§ 0 0 0 0 0§§
_ � � � e ■ w c c
CD CL � k \
a
/
ƒ
/
\
\
\
9
�
0
0
\
0■
o
E:
Q=
E
=
■a
■■f%°
j
\kII7
�=
_=
E0CD
$
g
E
E
=1
:3
CL
W
\
o
o
°
/
°
(
\
.
%
h2o$$o
/f-ph
\
o
%2ookk
.
/
/
®ƒ
O\
C,3
_L
r%3*
\/
CA)
CA)
'cn
S
§000gkwCD
\\
7
CL
b00000002)
\_
-4
C.0
�
0
.
r%)
CD
0000
1
k
9
\M
\000000
\
/\
_
°k
"\
\-
2==M
0N)
0=0000
� k
§ CL
2 k
Cl) Q
o
CL
■ �
�
�
§
■
�
Wil
00
/
rr
J
e�� �w��
c� -e''� - `\��
���,�'''
0 o
RESOLUTION NO. 9357 (2002 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER PURPOSES AND
APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT NO. 2402
WHEREAS, the City Council made certain findings concerning vesting tentative Tract
2402, as prescribed in Resolution No. 9242 (2001 Series), and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has submitted surety bonds in the total amounts of $279,000
(Faithful Performance) and $139,500 (Labor & Materials) to guarantee installation of the
required subdivision improvements shown on the approved plans, and all fees have been
received, as prescribed in the attached subdivision agreement, marked "Exhibit A ", and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director as approved the Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions (CC& R's) including maintenance requirements of the private utilities and
common areas, and
WHEREAS, the subdivider has made an unsuccessful "good faith effort" to acquire one of
the required off -site easements and has offered to compensate the City for a private sanitary sewer
easement across the adjacent City-owned property (Fire Station 3), in the approximate total amount
of $17,000, as shown in the attached "Exhibit A ", and
WHEREAS, in -lieu of the City having to proceed with eminent domain (condemnation)
procedures identified in the California Government Code (Subdivision Map Act), the Council has
determined that such a sewer easement across City property would be an acceptable alternative, and
WHEREAS, all other conditions required per said Resolution No. 9242 (2001 Series) have
been met or guaranteed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the final map for Tract No. 2402 is found
to be in substantial compliance with the vesting tentative map and final map approval is hereby
granted.
The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the attached Subdivision Agreement and sanitary
sewer easement deed to Augusta Street Partners, a California Limited Partnership ( "Exhibit B "), for
the benefit of the subdivision.
On motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland, and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of August 2002.
R 9357
Resolution No. 9357 (20 Series)
Page Two
ATTEST:
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
bwm OF 4 .
r &Ie n, Attorney
N
• O
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
TRACT 2402
THIS AGREEMENT is dated this day of 2002 by and
between Augusta Street Partners, a California limited partnership, herein referred to as
"Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred to as the "City."
RECITALS
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real
property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a
description of which is shown on the Final Map of Tract 2402, City of San Luis Obispo,
California, as approved by the City Council on the day of
2002.
The Subdivider desires that said Tract No. 2402 be accepted and approved as a
Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis Obispo (Title 17
of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and
It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agrees to install the
improvements as set forth on the plans therefore.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct
and install the following subdivision improvements in accordance with said subdivision
regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, to wit:.
1. CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS
2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING
3. WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the property line
and water services to the curb stop.
4. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
5. STREET LIGHTING
6. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to. the
inspection and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be
required . to file a letter stating that;the developer has properly installed all facilities to
be provided by him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to
residents upon request.
7. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on plans or required by City
regulations.
All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated and to the plans and
specifications on file and approved by said City Engineer.
The lines and grades for all of said improvements shall be established by the
Subdivider in accordance with said approved plans and specifications.
The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above improvements shall
begin within thirty (M) days from the date of recording of the final map, and that the work
shall be completed within eighteen (18) months of said recording date, unless an
extension has been granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work. is delayed
by acts of God or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the Subdivider shall have an
additional period of time equivalent to such period of delay in which to complete such
work. Any extension of time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the
Improvement Security filed pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety
waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California.
No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date
of the agreement until completion and acceptance of all public improvements unless
specifically approved by the City.
The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the
Planning Commission and /or the City Council and has paid, or will pay, the necessary fees
as indicated on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2.
•
The restoration of lost section comers and retracementof section lines within the
Subdivision shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the
Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions Code of the
State of California.
The Subdivider attaches,hereto, as an integral part hereof, and as security for the
performance of this agreement, an instrument of credit or bond approved by and in favor
of the City of San Luis Obispo, and conditional upon the faithful performance of this
agreement. Said instrument of creditor bond is in the total amount of two hundred seventy
nine thousand dollars ($ 279,000) that is the amount of the estimated cost of said
improvements. Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects in the improvements arising from
faulty workmanship or materials or defective construction of said improvements occurring
Within twelve (1.2) months after acceptance thereof. In accordance with Sections 66499.7
and 66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California, upon final completion and
acceptance of the work, City will release all but 106/o of the improvement security, that
amount being deemed sufficient to,guarantee faithful performance by the Subdivider of his
obligation to remedy any defects in the improvements arising within a period of one year
following the completion and acceptance thereof.
Completion of the work shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the
City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted; accept said improvements.
according to said plans,and specifications, and any approved modifications thereto.
Neither periodic nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said
improvements or waive any defects in the same or any'breach of this agreement.,
If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the
Subdivider agrees that City may, at its option, declare the instrument of credit or bond
which has been posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and
•
utilize the proceeds to complete said improvements, or city may complete said
improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his
surety.
Additionally, the Subdivider attaches hereto, as an integral part hereof, an
instrument of credit or bond approved by and in favor of the City of San Luis Obispo in the
total amount of one Hundred thirty nine thousand five hundred dollars ($139,500) as a
labor and materials surety which is fifty percent (50 %) of the above described subdivision
improvements in accordance with State law.
Said Subdivider has paid an inspection fee of twenty four thousand seven hundred
ninety six dollars ($24,796) for City to inspect the installation of said subdivision
improvements, and to verify that they have been completed in accordance with the plans
and specifications.
Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivision, ". all plans and
specifications on file with said City Engineer as a part of said Subdivision Map, and all
other documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer
are hereby referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of
the Subdivider under this agreement.
It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City hereto that
this agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of
the respective Parties to this agreement.
It is agreed that the Subdivider will furnish copies of the successful bidder's contract
unit prices and total bid prices for all of the improvements herein referred to.
• - C
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by:
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
:9011 R-85WEARM
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
relledsLL/
SUBDIVIDER
Augusta Street Partners, a California
lim*d partnership
Johl Wilson, President
J.M Wilson Development Corporation
EXHIBIT 1
TRACT 2402 .
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
1. The Subdivider has deposited a monumentation guarantee in the amount of $2,000 for
"Monument Bond' to cover the installation of survey monuments in accordance with the
approved map and payment for same. This guarantee will be released to the Subdivider upon
receipt by the City of a letter from the Engineer /Surveyor indicating that they have completed
the work and have been paid.
2. Park -in -lieu fees have been paid, as listed in the attached EXHIBIT 2.
3. Water and sewer impact fees shall be paid at time of building permits through the Community
Development Department, Building Division, in accordance with City Regulations.
4. Transportation impact fees shall be paid at time of building permits through the Community
Development Department, Building Division, in accordance with City Regulations.
5. The .subdivider shall comply with all requirements of Council Resolution No 9.242 (2001)
approving the tentative map.
6. * The subdivider shall compensate the City of San Luis Obispo for the private sewer easement
across City owned property" in the amount identified in Exhibit 2.
r
0
EXHIBIT 2
TRACT 2402 -FEE AND BOND LIST
'Based on estimates submitted 11/21/01, and the application of an increase of 50/6 for inflation and 15% for contingencies.
2 All Impact Fees are adjusted annually (typically July 1) based on CPI (July 2001 fee is shown)
Amount
Form
Date Received
Bonds and Guarantees:
Faithful Performance
$279,000
Bond -
7/17/02_
Labor & Materials (50% of total cost
$139;500
Bond_
7/17/02
of improvements
Monument Guarantee
$2,000
CD or Letter
of Credit
Fees:
Map Check Fee
$5,091
Check
8/24/01_
Plan Check Fee
$36,709
Check
_ _ 8/24/01
Inspection Fee
$24,796
Check
_ 4/16/02
Park In -Lieu Fee
-
18 units x $3,462 /multifamily du
$62,316
Check
8/8/02
Water Impact Fee (Estimate)
Due with each building
18 units x $5,648
$101,664
N/A
permit. at the rate in effect
at the time of permit, ,
Wastewater Impact Fee (Estimate)
Due with each building
18 units x $2,237
$40,266
N/A
permit in accordance
with City regulations.
Transportation Impact Fee (Estimate)
Due with each building
18 units x $1,272
$22,896
N/A
permit in accordance
with City regulations.
*Compensation for Easement across City
$3,000
Check
8/8/02
Property (Fire Station #3)
$14,000
N/A
Approxitnate value of
improvements to Fire Station
#3 identified in Letter of
Agreement dated June 15, 2002
Affordable Housing Requirements
Dedication of a Rental Housing Unit, and. payment of In- Lieu -Fee in
accordance with City Regulations.
'Based on estimates submitted 11/21/01, and the application of an increase of 50/6 for inflation and 15% for contingencies.
2 All Impact Fees are adjusted annually (typically July 1) based on CPI (July 2001 fee is shown)
• • EXHIBIT B
Recording Requested by
and when recorded, return to:
John L. Wallace & Associates
ATTN.: Brad Brechwald, RCE
4115 Broad Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
DEED OF EASEMENT
APN 004 - 982 -021
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of
San Luis Obispo, a chartered Municipal Corporation, hereby GRANTS to Augusta Street Partners,
a California Limited Partnership, as GRANTEE, an irrevocable easement for private sanitary sewer
line purposes over a portion of that certain property described in Document No.: 65949, recorded
on September 28, 1989, in Book 3389, Page 922 of Official Records in the Office of the County
Recorder, City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California described as
follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Being the southerly 3.048 meters ( 10.00 feet) of said property.
END DESCRIPTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR hereunto caused its/their name(s) to be subscribed this
day of , 2002
Mayor Allen K. Settle
�s ,y`�,, �J,��
° ��
��
,(� ,��'
' \������
�� �
��
• O
RESOLUTION NO. 9356 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADJUSTING THE COMPENSATION FOR THE CITY'S CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2002 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo designates the Executive Assistant to the City
Administrative Officer, the Executive Assistant to the Director of Human Resources, the Legal
Assistant/Paralegal and the Human Resources Technician as confidential employees pursuant to the
Government Code,
WHEREAS, as such, confidential employees are precluded from collective bargaining and
therefore are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement,
WHEREAS, the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment for
confidential employees are established by resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The City agrees to amend the PERS contract to include the 2.7% at 55
formula for miscellaneous members to be effective February 1, 2003. This is contingent upon all
affected employee groups reaching an agreement with the City on costs and implementation date.
SECTION 2. The City agrees to pay the additional 1% of the employees' contribution
for a total of 8% upon implementation of the new retirement formula of 2.7% at 55.
SECTION 3. The provision in Resolution No. 9153 — 2001 Series for a salary increase of
2% that was to be effective the first day of the first full pay period of July 2002 shall be rescinded;
additionally, salaries shall be reduced 1% effective the first full pay period in July 2002. Effective
the first full pay period of January 2003, salaries shall be increased 2 %.
SECTION 4. The cafeteria plan contribution for confidential employees shall be
increased to $530 per month effective the first day of the first full pay period of January 2003.
Upon motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland, and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20`h day of August 2002.
R 9356
•
Resolution No. 9356 (2002 Series)
Page 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
•rne
0
•
1 ��,1�`
�" ,v�
�V�
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 9355 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REVISING
THE MANAGEMENT PAY FOR- PERFORMANCE SYSTEM FOR APPOINTED
OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENT HEADS AND OTHER MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL AND
SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to a comprehensive policy that strengthens the
recruitment and retention of well qualified and effective appointed officials and management
personnel; and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to work with employee groups to amend the
PERS contract to provide the 2.7% at 55 retirement formula; and
WHEREAS, in 1996 the City Council established the Management Pay for Performance
System for a two year period, revised it in 1998, in 2000, and 2001; and
WHEREAS, in adopting Resolution 9247 (2001 Series) directed that participation in
retirement enhancements for miscellaneous employees would be cost - neutral to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby revises the Management Pay for Performance System as follows:
SECTION 1. The Management Pay for Performance System will be extended for a one -
year term.
SECTION 2. The City agrees to amend the PERS contract to include the 2.7% at 55
formula for miscellaneous members to be effective February 1, 2003. This is contingent upon all
affected employee groups reaching an agreement with the City on costs and implementation date.
SECTION 3. The City agrees to pay the additional 1% of the employees' contribution
for a total of 8% upon implementation of the new retirement formula of 2.7% at 55.
SECTION 4. Effective the first full pay period in August 2002, salaries shall be reduced
3% as shown in Exhibit "A ". Effective the first full pay period in February 2003, salaries shall be
increased by 2% as shown in Exhibit `B ".
SECTION 5. The City shall continue to provide employees in those classifications listed
in Exhibit "A" certain fringe benefits as set forth in Resolution No. 9088 (2000 Series), with the
cafeteria plan contribution increasing to $560 per month effective March 1, 2003.
SECTION 6. The Director of Finance shall adjust the appropriate accounts to reflect the
compensation changes.
R 9355
Resolution No. 9355 (2002 Series)
Page 2
•
Upon motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland, and
on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20`h day of Ana l-t Inn)
A
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
11i. ps, F, WOJI2, 6. a ��
R�' , 0' F"
W , (4?y Attorney
APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective August 1, 2002
PrNuch-41�
Note: Salaries for Police and Fire Chief are not changing because those classifications are safety position and are
not affected by the 2.7% at 55 retirement. formula.
SALARY
RANGE
SALARY GROUP
CLASSIFICATIONS
Bottom
Top
I
City Administrative Officer
9,393
11,740
II
City Attorney
8,579
10,722
III
Assistant City Administrative Officer
7,257
9,072
Public Works Director
7,257
9,072
III -A
Police Chief
7,481
9,353
IV
Community Development Director
6,919
8,650
Finance Director
6,919
8,650
Utilities Director
6,919
8,650
IV -A
Fire Chief
7,133
8,918
V
Director of Human Resources
6,552
8,190
Parks and Recreation Director
VI
Deputy Public Works Director -City Engineer
6,024
7,529
VII
Assistant City Attorney
5,738
7,170
City Clerk
Deputy CDD- Development Review
Deputy CDD -Long Range Planning
Deputy Public Works Director
VIII
Economic Development Manager
5,136
6,421
Natural Resources Manager
Wastewater Division Manager
Water Division Manager
IX
Accounting Manager
4,923
6,151
Chief Building Official
Fire Marshall
Information Systems Manager
Revenue Manager
Supervising Civil Engineer
X
Assistant to the CAO
4,606
5,757
Parking Manager
Principal Civil Engineer
Principal Transportation Planner
Recreation Manager II
Risk Manager
Transit Manager
Note: Salaries for Police and Fire Chief are not changing because those classifications are safety position and are
not affected by the 2.7% at 55 retirement. formula.
O • E -&►6% f A
X Utilities Engineer 4,606 5,757
Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor
Water Projects Manager
Water Treatment Plant Supervisor
XI Administrative Analyst 4,344 5,431
Communications Manager
GIS Manager
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
Human Resources Analyst
Industrial Waste Coordinator
Neighborhood Services Manager
Public Safety Information Systems Coordinator
Recreation Manager I
Utilities Conservation Coordinator
Wastewater Collection Supervisor
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Supply Supervisor
XII Accounting Supervisor 4,009 5,011
Arborist
Customer Services Supervisor
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
Field Enginerring Supervisor
Fleet Supervisor
Golf Course Supervisor
Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Police Records Supervisor
Program and Project Coordinator
Recreation Supervisor
Streets Maintenance Supervisor
GAManagement CompensabonuAOBManagement Salary Schedule.xis]August 2002
• 0
APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE EXHIBIT B
Effective February 3, 2003
SALARY
RANGE
SALARY GROUP
CLASSIFICATIONS
Bottom
Top
I
City Administrative Officer
9,581
11,975
11
City Attorney
8,751
10,936
III
Assistant City Administrative Officer
7,402
9,253
Public Works Director
7,402
9,253
III -A
Police Chief
7,481
9,353
IV
Community Development Director
7,057
8,823
Finance Director
7,057
8,823
Utilities Director
7,057
8,823
IV -A
Fire Chief
7,133
8,918
V
Director of Human Resources
6,683
8,354
Parks and Recreation Director
VI
Deputy Public Works Director -City Engineer
6,144
7,680
VII
Assistant City Attorney
5,853
7,313
City Clerk
Deputy CDD- Development Review
Deputy CDD -Long Range Planning
Deputy Public Works Director
VIII
Economic Development Manager
5,239
6,549
Natural Resources Manager
Wastewater Division Manager
Water Division Manager
IX
Accounting Manager
5,021
6,274
Chief Building Official
Fire Marshall
Information Systems Manager
Revenue Manager
Supervising Civil Engineer
X
Assistant to the CAO
4,698
5,872
Parking Manager
Principal Civil Engineer
Principal Transportation Engineer
Principal Transportation Planner
Recreation Manager II
Risk Manager
Transit Manager
Note: Salaries for Police
Chief and Fire Chief are not changing because those positions are safety positions and
are not affected by the 2.7% at 55 retirement formula.
i o
�xhib�f �
X Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor
4,698 5,872
Water Projects Manager
Water Treatment Plant Supervisor
Utilities Engineer
XI Administrative Analyst
4,431 5,540
Communication Manager
GIS Manager
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
Human Resources Analyst
Industrial Waste Coordinator
Neighborhood Services Manager
Public Safety Information Systems Coordinator
Recreation Manager I
Utilities Conservation Coordinator
Wastewater Collection Supervisor
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Supply Supervisor
XII Accounting Supervisor
4,088 5,110
Arborist.
Customer Services Supervisor
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor
Field Enginerring Supervisor
Fleet Supervisor
Golf Course Supervisor
Parks Maintenance Supervisor
Police Records Supervisor
Program and Project Coordinator
Recreation Supervisor
Streets Maintenance Supervisor
GAManagement Compensation \[AO &Management Salary ScheduleAs]August 2002
� G��"
r
,�
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 9354 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO ADOPTING AND RATIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE SAN LUIS
OBISPO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 19 2000 -
JUNE 309 2004
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby
resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of
San Luis Obispo and the San Luis Obispo City Police Officers' Association (POA), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted and ratified.
SECTION 2. The Finance Director shall adjust the Personnel Services appropriation
accounts to reflect the negotiated compensation changes.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a copy of the
executed Memorandum of Agreement approved by it to: Dale Strobridge, San Luis Obispo
Police Officers' Association, and Ann Slate, Director of Human Resources.
Upon motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20"' day of August 2002.
Mayor Allen K. Settle
ATTE
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
-K - , /
R 9354
EXHIBIT "A"
ADDENDUM
TO THE 2000 -2004 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AND
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
A. PURPOSE OF THIS ADDENDUM
Pursuant to Article 43 of the 2000 -04 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) the City and
Association have meet and conferred regarding the implementation of improved
retirement benefits for non -swom employees of the bargaining unit. Additionally, the
parties have agreed to transfer the representation of the Police Records Clerks from the
San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association to the San Luis Obispo Police Officers'
Association. This addendum confirms the agreement of the parties to modify the MOA.
B. MODIFICATION OF RETIREMENT FORMULA
1. The City agrees to amend the PERS contract to include the 2.7% at 55 formula for
miscellaneous members to be effective February 1, 2003. This is contingent upon all
affected employee groups reaching an agreement with the City on costs and
implementation date.
2. Non -swom employees represented by the SLOPOA will pay the additional 1% of the
employees' contribution for a total of 8% upon implementation of the new retirement
formula of 2.7% at 55.
C. REPRESENTATION OF POLICE RECORDS CLERKS
1. The representation of the classification of Police Records Clerks shall be transferred from
the San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association (SLOCEA) to the SLOPOA, effective
immediately.
2. As unit members of the SLOPOA, the Records Clerk's salary range will be increased by
7% and the employees will pay the employee retirement contribution of 7% effective July
4, 2002.
3. The Records Clerks shall continue to receive the health insurance contribution of $485
per month. Future adjustments to the health insurance benefit shall be determined during
the health plan reopener in accordance with the current SLOPOA MOA.
•
Addendum to 2000 -2004 Memorandan of'Aoreement page 2
San Luis Obispo .Police Officers' .Association
4. The Records Clerks will be eligible for all other benefits currently afforded the other non-
sworn employees represented by the SLOPOA except uniform allowance. The City and
the Association agree to discuss uniform allowance adjustments for Record Clerks as part
of the health insurance contribution reopener and will work with the Department in
developing a new uniform standard for Records Clerks. The Records Clerks will
continue to receive $125 quarterly for uniform allowance as provided for in the current
SLOCEA MOA.
D. SALARY INCREASES
The following table of scheduled salary increases replaces those increases listed in the
MOA's ( SLOCEA MOA for the Records Clerks and the SLOPOA MOA for the
Communications Technicians, Field Service Technicians and the Evidence Technician):
First full pay
period following:
Records Clerks
Com Techs, Evidence
Tech, FST's
7/1/02
0%
3% :5% for FST's
1/1/03
2.5%
0%
2/1/03
Implementation of 2.7% at
55, employees pay
additional -1% of PERS
Implementation of 2.7%
at 55, employees pay
additional I% of PERS
7/1/03
0%
2%
1/1/04
2%
2%
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
OW (aa-
Ann Slate,
Director of Human Resources
SAN LUIS OBISPO
POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
z
ale Strobndge, SLOPOA V' a President
G:\MOAs\Police Officers Association\P.ddendum to 2000 -2004 SLOPOA MOA.doc
• 0 E>thlb;�
Police Officers' Association
Salary Range Listing - July 2000 Through June 2004
July 2000
5% Increase
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7 Step 8 Step 9
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly
705
Police Cadet
2,860
3,011
3,169
3,336
3,512
3,696
1,320
1,390
1,463
1,540
1,621
1,706
707
Field Service
3,092
3,254
3,425
3,606
3,796
3,995
Technician
1,427
1,502
1,581
1,664
1,752
1,844
708
Communications
3,092
3,254
3,425
3,606
3,796
3,995
Technician 1
1,427
1,502
1,581
1,664
1,752
1,844
720
Evidence
4,116
4,332
4,561
4,801
5,053
5,319
Technician
1,900
2,000
2,105
2,216
2,332
2,455
750
Police officer
3,660
3,852
4,055
4,268
4,493
4,730
4,978 5,241 5,516
1,689
1,778
1,872
1,970
2,074
2,183
2,298 2,419 2,546
July 2001
3% Increase
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Step 7 Step 8 Step 9
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly
705
Police Cadet
2,946
3,101
3,264
3,436
3,616
3,807
1,360
1,431
1,506
1,586
1,669
1,757
707
Field Service
3,184
3,351
3,528
3,713
3,909
4,115
Technician
1,469
1,547
1,628
1,714
1,804
1,899
708
Communications
3,184
3,351
3,528
3,713
3,909
4,115
Technician 1
1,469
1,547
1,628
1,714
1,804
1,899
720
Evidence
4,240
4,463
4,698
4,945
5,206
5,480
Technician
1,957
2,060
2,168
2,282
2,403
2,529
750
Police officer
3,769
3,967
4,176
4,396
4,627
4,871
5,127 5,397 5,681
1,739
1,831
1,927
2,029
2,136
2,248
2,366 2,491 2,622
i •
Police Officers' Association
Salary Range Listing - July 2000 Through June 2004
January 2002 2% Increase
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6 Step 7
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly
705
Police Cadet
3,162
3,329
3,504
3,689
3,883
1,460
1,536
1,617
1,702
1,792
707
Field Service
3,418
3,598
3,788
3,987
4,197--
Technician
1,578
1,661
1,748
1,840
1,937
708
Communications
3,418
3,598
3,788
3,987
4,197
Technician I
1,578
1,661
1,748
1,840
1,937
720
Evidence
4,553
4,793
5,045
5,311
5,590
Technician
2,101
2,212
2,328
2,451
2,580
750
Police Officer
4,259
4,483
4,719
4,967
5,229
5,504 5,794
1,966
2,069
2,178
2,293
2,413
2,540 2,674
July 2002
.5% Increase for Field Service Technicians
and
3% for all others (added records clerks - 0 salary increase)
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6 Step 7
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly
700
Records Clerk 1
2,504
2,636
2,775
2,921
3,075
1,156
1,217
1,281
1,348
1,419
704
Records Clerk II
2,778
2,924
3,078
3,240
3,410
1,282
1,350
1,421
1,495
1,574
705
Police Cadet
3,258
3,429
3,610
3,800
4,000
1,504
1,583
1,666
1,754
1,846
707
Field Service
3,436
3,617
3,807
4,008
4,219
Technician
1,586
1,669
1,757
1,850
1,947
708
Communications
3,521
3,706
3,901
4,106
4,323
Technician 1
1,625
1,710
1,800
1,895
1,995
720
Evidence
4,689
4,936
5,196
5,469
5,757
Technician
2,164
2,278
2,398
2,524
2,657
750
Police Officer
4,386
4,617
4,860
5,116
5,385
5,669 5,967
2,024
2,131
2,243
2,361
2,485
2,616 2,754
Ey'htbit A
Police Officers' Association
Salary Range Listing - July 2000 Through June 2.004
January 2003
2% Increase for Police Officers, 2.5% increase for Records Clerks
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6 Step 7
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi Weekly Bi- Weekly
700
Records Clerk 1
2,566
2,701
2,843
2,993
3,150
1,184
1,247
1,312
1,381
1,454
704
Records Clerk 11
2,847
2,996
_ 3,154
3,320
3,495-
1,314
1,383
1,456
1,532
1,613
705
Police Cadet
3,258
3,429
3,610
3,800
4,000
1,504
1,583
1,666
1,754
1,846
707
Field Service
3,436
3,617
3,807
4,008
4,219
Technician
1,586
1,669
1,757
1,850
1,947
708
Communications
3,521
3,706
3,901
4,106
4,323
Technician 1
1,625
1,710
1,800
1,895
1,995
720
Evidence
4,689
4,936
5,196
5,469
5,757
Technician
2,164
2,278
2,398
2,524
2,657
750
Police Officer
4,474
4,709
4,957
5,218
5,493
5,782 6,086
2,065
2,174
2,288
2,408
2,535
2,669 2,809
July 2003
2% Increase for Sworn and
2% Increase for Non
-Sworn
0% Increase for Records Clerks
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6 Step 7
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
81-Weekly Bi- Weekly
700
Records Clerk 1
2,566
2,701
2,843
2,993
3,150
1,184
1,247
1,312
1,381
1,454
704
Records Clerk 11
2,847
2,996
3,154
3,320
3,495
1,314
1,383
1,456
1,532
1,613
705
Police Cadet
3,323
3,498
3,682
3,876
4,080
1,534
1,614
1,699
1,789
1,883
707
Field Service
3,505
3,689
3,883
4,088
4,303
Technician
1,618
1,703
1,792
1,887
1,986
708
Communications
3,591
3,780
3,979
4,189
4,409
Technician
1,658
1,745
1,837
1,933
2,035
720
Evidence
4,800
5,053
5,319
5,599
5,893
Technician
2,215
2,332
2,455
2,584
2,720
750
Police Officer
4,563
4,803
5,056
5,322
5,602
5,897 6,208
2,106
2,217
2,334
2,456
2,586
2,722 2,865
• o
Police Officers' Association
Salary Range Listing - July 2000 Through June 2004
January 2004 2% Increase
Sxhi b 11 A
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6 Step 7
Salary
Position
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/
Monthly/ Monthly/
Range
Title
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly
Bi- Weekly Bi- Weekly
700
Records Clerk 1
2,617
2,755
2,900
3,053
3,213
1,208
1,271
1,338
1,409
1,483
704
Records Clerk II
2,903
3,056
3,217
3,386
3,564-
1,340
1,410
1,485
1,563
1,645
705
Police Cadet
3,390
3,569
3,756
3,954
4,162
1,565
1,647
1,734
1,825
1,921
707
Field Service
3,575
3,764
3,962
4,170
4,390
Technician
1,650
1,737
1,828
1,925
2,026
708
Communications
3,664
3,856
4,059
4,273
4,498
Technician 1
1,691
1,780
1,874
1,972
2,076
720
Evidence
4,895
5,153
5,424
5,710
6,010
Technician
2,259
2,378
2,504
2,635
2,774
750
Police Officer
4,654
4,899
5,157
5,428
5,714
6,014 6,331
2,148
2261
2,380
2,505
2,637
2,776 2,922
P
• o
RESOLUTION NO. 9353 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO ADOPTING AND RATIFYING AN ADDENDUM TO THE MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND THE SAN LUIS
OBISPO CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1,
2003 — DECEMBER 31, 2003
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo hereby
resolves as follows:
SECTION 1. The Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of
San Luis Obispo and the San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association ( SLOCEA), attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted and ratified.
SECTION 2. The Finance Director shall adjust the Personnel Services appropriation
accounts to reflect the negotiated compensation changes.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall furnish a copy of this resolution and a copy of the
executed Addendum to the Memorandum of Agreement approved by it to: Richard Brown,
SLOCEA President, and Ann Slate, Director of Human Resources.
Upon motion' of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of August 2002.
Mayor Allen K. Sett re
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ff y G. o nse , City Attorney
R 9353
0
ADDENDUM
•
TO THE 2001 -2002 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO 0.
AND
THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION
A. PURPOSE OF THIS ADDENDUM
Article 40 of the 2001 -02 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) allowed negotiations to be re-
opened regarding the implementation of improved retirement benefits for non -sworn
employees of the bargaining unit. Additionally, the parties have agreed to transfer the
representation of the Police Records Clerks from the San Luis Obispo City Employees'
Association to the San Luis Obispo Police Officers' Association. This addendum confirms
the agreement of the parties to modify and extend the term the MOA.
B. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of the agreement shall be extended until midnight December 31, 2003. Except as
modified below, all other terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect.
C. MODIFICATION OF RETIREMENT FORMULA
1. The City agrees to amend the PERS contract to include the 2.7% at 55 formula for
miscellaneous members to be effective February 1, 2003. This is contingent upon all
affected employee groups reaching an agreement with the City on costs and
implementation date.
2. The City agrees to pay the additional 1% of the employees' contribution fora total of 8%
upon implementation of the new retirement formula of 2.7% at 55.
D. REPRESENTATION OF POLICE RECORDS CLERKS
The representation of the classification of Police Records Clerks shall be transferred from the
San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association (SLOCEA) to the SLOPOA, effective
immediately.
•
0
Addendum to 2001 -2002 Memorand= of Agreement Page 2
San Luis Obispo City Employees' Association
E. SALARY INCREASES
The following table of scheduled salary increases replaces those increases listed in Article 7,
Section D of the 2001 -02 MOA:
First full pay period
following:
SLOCEA
—
7/1/02
0%
1/1/03
2%
F. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
Article 16, Supplemental Retirement Plan, is herewith deleted.
G. CAFETERIA PLAN INCREASES
Effective January 1, 2003, the City shall contribute $560 per month per employee for
Cafeteria plan benefits in Article 17, Insurance and Refund.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
William Avery, City Consultant
rOILAA 10��
Slate,
Director of Human Resources
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION
Paul Bechely, SLOCEA Consultant
6 10-6-� <S76� Wu^
Richard Brown, SLOCEA President
GAMOM \General Employees\Addendum to 2001 -2002 CEA MOA.doc
tw-
�5
I
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 9352 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL MAP
FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2372
(906 CALLE DEL CAMINOS)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of public testimony,
the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one -year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That a one -year time extension for filing the final map for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2372 is granted to July 5, 2003, subject to the original findings
and conditions of tentative map approval, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 9067
(2000 Series).
On motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of August 2002.
Mayor Allen K. Settle
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
frey G. Jorge en, Aty Attorney
R 9352
iV�U`'• `�.�
� ��' • •
°° �
��
• o
RESOLUTION NO. 9351(2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE -YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL MAP
FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2366
. (936 FULLER ROAD)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. That this Council, after consideration of public testimony,
the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one -year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That a one -year time extension for filing the final map for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2366 is granted to July 5, 2003, subject to the original findings
and conditions of tentative map approval, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 9066
(2000 Series).
On motion of Council Member Schwartz, seconded by Council Member Mulholland,
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Mulholland and Schwartz, and Mayor Settle
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Marx
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 20`s day of August 2002.
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Settle
r_n, Cfy Attorney
R 9351
.\w �)
RESOLUTION NO 9350 (2002 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AMENDING AND RETITLING THE 1995 PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN AND
RESCINDING RESOLUTION 8480 (1996 SERIES)
WHEREAS, the City adopted its first Parking Management Plan in 1987 and revised the
plan in 1990 and 1995; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes its responsibility to effectively manage parking throughout
the community to help maintain the quality of life in residential areas and the economic and cultural
vitality of the commercial core; and
WHEREAS, the City further recognizes that reducing the employee demand for private
vehicle parking through implementation of trip reduction measures also contributes to the
downtown's economic and cultural vitality and quality of environment; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed the revised and retitled
Parking Management Plan, has determined that its implementation will not have a significant
adverse impact on the environment, and has prepared a Negative Declaration consistent with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the environmental
determination made by the Community Development Director, and has determined that it is prudent
to revise the Parking Management Plan to maintain consistency with the Circulation Element and to
refine parking and access management policies and programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
Council finds no significant environmental impact. The findings of the environmental review
of the revised Parking Management Plan will not result in any significant environmental
impact and the Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the revised Plan.
2. The revised Parking Management Plan, retitled the "Access and Parking Management Plan
(July 2002), " attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby adopted.
3. Copies of the Access and Parking Management Plan (July 2002) will be distributed to City
departments and made available to the public at the Public Works Department and City Clerk's
offices.
On motion of Council Member Ewan, seconded by Vice Mayor Marx and on the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Ewan, Mulholland, Vice Mayor Marx, and Mayor Settle
NOES: Council Member Schwartz
ABSENT: None
R 9350
Resoltuion No. 9350Q002 Series) •
Page 2
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of July 2002.
Mayor Allen K. Settle
Lee Price, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
R I 1• I,, I
0
0
city of san tuts osIspo
ACCESS & PARKING MANAGEMENT
PLAN
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
Allen K. Settle, Mayor
Jan Howell Marx, Vice Mayor
John Ewan
Ken Schwartz
Christine Mulholland
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Mike McCluskey, Director
Timothy Bochum, Deputy Director of Public Works
Tent' Sanville, Principal Transportation Planner
Keith Opalewski, Parking Manager
CITY ADMINISTRATION
Ken Hampian, City Administrative Officer
Wendy George, Assistant City Administrative Officer
1
0
CITY TRANSPORTATION PLANS
G
The City of San Luis Obispo adopts and maintains plans that help direct the implementation of the
General Plan Circulation Element. These plans include:
Title of Document
Status
Acres- & Parking Management Plan (this document)
lTndared 1111Y.7007
Bicycle Transportation Plan
lIndared May,
Short Range Transit Plan
Adopted November, 1997
Pavement Management Plan
Adopted February, 1988
For more information about City transportation plans, projects and programs, contact the San Luis
Obispo Public Works Department, Transportation Division at (805) 781 -7210.
0 0
TABLE OF
Topic Page
Introduction............................................................................................................ ............................... 4
Relationship to Other Plans and Policies ..................................................... ....
..................................... 4
Scopeof Plan ......................................................................................................... ............................... 5
ParkingManagement Goals ................................................................................... ............................... 6
Definitions..............................................................................:............................... ............................... 6
GeneralUse of Parking .......................................................................................... ............................... 7
EmployeeUse of Parking ...................................................................................... ............................... 8
JurorUse of Parking .............................................................................................. ............................... 9
Expansionof Parking .......................................................................................... .............. .I..............:. 10
Enforcement......................................................................................................... ............................... 10
Financing of Commercial Core Parking .............................................................. ............................... 11
ResidentialParking ............................................................................................. ............................... 12
Program Administration and Promotion ............................................................. ............................... 12
APPENDIX
A.1 Map of Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area Showing Existing Parking....... 14
A.23 Map of Existing Residential Parking Districts .............................................. .............................16
• ■ ■ ff R ■� 11 ■ ■• ■ ■ .■
3
0 0
INTRODUCTION
Between 1977 and 1987, a number of studies were conducted to assess the vehicle parking situation
in downtown San Luis Obispo. As a result of this work, the City built two parking structures that
house 669 vehicles. The first parking structure located at the comer of Palm and Morro Streets was
completed in 1988. The second garage at the comer of Chorro and Marsh Streets was completed in
1990. An expansion of the March Street garage that adds 342 rpncPS (net increase of 245 .mac
will he completed in September 2002- These three projects resulted in a total of 1,007 gar2gee
spaces. In addition, the City manages over 1,600 spaces located in surface lots and along
downtown streets. Another result of these early parking studies was the City's adoption of its first
Parking Management Plan in 1987. The management plan was updated in 1990 and again in 1995
to reflect the completion of some of the major parking projects, and to better define management
policies.
In February 1993, a group of local architects and designers completed a Conceptual Physical Plan
for the City's Center (commonly known as the Downtown Concept Plan). The City Council has
adopted, in concept, the Plan and feels that it should be considered when making planning decisions
that affect the City's center. The Plan was revised in 1997 to reflect changes to the Court Street
Parking Tot area The Concept Plan suggests that a number of new parking structures be built and
that the pedestrian character of the commercial core be improved.
In November 1994, the City adopted a new General Plan Circulation Element. The adopted
Circulation Element directs the City to conduct studies of downtown parking needs and to consider
ways of reducing traffic congestion by promoting the use of other types of transportation. The
Circulation Element also directs the reevaluation of the use of curb space in the commercial core
with the aim of creating more short-term parking spaces.
This plan has been revised to address a number of events and decisions that have occurred since
19985, including the following:.
` 1 •• Ii. i i. i 'i .•i• iii ii •u1 -.• • 1/ 1/•1.••• .1•
• - u 1 1 1 - 1 -.• . 1 • • . - .. 1 • • 1 - • • 1 1 1 . 1 "
• • • 1. -1 11.1. WN IstQ11SIMMAIWARM •• .11 1.1 1/• • • 11.1• •
1 • 1 • .I I / . .• 1
c • 1 11 - 1 . It 1 - 11 - 1 1 •
/ " / Y. 1 1) • .1/ • .II ' 1 • 1 • � ' . 1 / " �
• • JY. 11 1 " 1 1 . • • • ' •
• - 1 11.1 1 . 1 1 . • • • . 1 • .•1 /1 1 •
• . .� 1 • 1 1 . 1 . • " 1/ " / • • ' 1 •
• - . - 1 • •. " • S ► /.- 1 • / - 1 1 . • • • -4
� • 1 1 1 11 1" � • 1 11- 1 •-• 1 • 1 • • 1 ' .• 1 _ 1I 1._" 11 "1 ' . 1 •
4
• •
1 . 1 1 • " .
•- - 11" 1. .11.1• • 1"
1l - /1 • 1 1 11 . 1 1 - •. . 1 . 1 • 1 A \MAIMI
• . - . . • - .
1 1• . 1" 11 1• •1 • 1" ••
" .. 1' . 1
Street Entitied the. "North
Area Regional
constnirting new
Administrative Complex-
• 1 1 - • / - . • 11 - . NorNIMMOLVAPRIVIORM
/ " I -.• • . 1 • 1 . 1 ' 1.11.1
/- 1- • 111 "1 • I" • 1111"
1 . / .
1 rl 1 • •.
1 M " 1 / 1 " 11 • 1 • 1 " • •
• . 1 • • . I •
/ • • 1 1. 1" • 1• 1 •
r • "
The San Luis Ohis= o 17nwntnwn Ascnciatinn participated
in the review of this the 1995 Parking Management Plan. This updated plan will be used as a
management tool to help direct how vehicle parking should be provided and used throughout San
Luis Obispo and hnw the demand for downtown an rking will he managed_
o RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES
The City's General Plan Land Use Element establishes the pattern of land uses throughout San Luis
Obispo. The General Plan Circulation Element identifies how transportation services will be
provided to land uses envisioned by the Land Use Element. One of these transportation services is
vehicle parking. This plan provides specific direction for the management of vehicle parking in a
way that supports the Circulation Element's overall transportation strategy. This plan focuses on
the management of vehicle parking in the community's commercial core. Parking of bicycles is
addressed by the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2QQ21993) but is an issue that is relevant to the use
of City parking structures and surface lots.
SCOPE OF THIS PLAN
This plan establishes vehicle parking policies and programs that apply throughout San Luis Obispo.
However, its primary focus is the management of parking in the commercial core. 'Phis lai n also
identifie-, in Appendix A-2„ nppmv_ dQ management terhni =nec for putting to better nse existing
parking cn� ate, and for rednring, he. empin= demand for az rking snacec in the cnmmercial cnre
This plan may be revised from time to time to address parking needs in areas beyond and within the
commercial core. For more information about City parking programs, contact the Parking Section
of the Public Works Department at (805) 781 -7230.
5
plamz for q tmnsit-pnrking-mixed
use facility east of Santa Ross
Street Entitied the. "North
Area Regional
constnirting new
Administrative Complex-
Facil► h : E 1 • - Yj . •
1 • • 1 • •1 1 1 1
/ . 1 o • - • ,;ewe—tVe7I*wT-L&XIIT
Cij . 1 • / - . 1 . 1 1 - • • 1 1
The San Luis Ohis= o 17nwntnwn Ascnciatinn participated
in the review of this the 1995 Parking Management Plan. This updated plan will be used as a
management tool to help direct how vehicle parking should be provided and used throughout San
Luis Obispo and hnw the demand for downtown an rking will he managed_
o RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES
The City's General Plan Land Use Element establishes the pattern of land uses throughout San Luis
Obispo. The General Plan Circulation Element identifies how transportation services will be
provided to land uses envisioned by the Land Use Element. One of these transportation services is
vehicle parking. This plan provides specific direction for the management of vehicle parking in a
way that supports the Circulation Element's overall transportation strategy. This plan focuses on
the management of vehicle parking in the community's commercial core. Parking of bicycles is
addressed by the Bicycle Transportation Plan (2QQ21993) but is an issue that is relevant to the use
of City parking structures and surface lots.
SCOPE OF THIS PLAN
This plan establishes vehicle parking policies and programs that apply throughout San Luis Obispo.
However, its primary focus is the management of parking in the commercial core. 'Phis lai n also
identifie-, in Appendix A-2„ nppmv_ dQ management terhni =nec for putting to better nse existing
parking cn� ate, and for rednring, he. empin= demand for az rking snacec in the cnmmercial cnre
This plan may be revised from time to time to address parking needs in areas beyond and within the
commercial core. For more information about City parking programs, contact the Parking Section
of the Public Works Department at (805) 781 -7230.
5
PARKING
•
Support the commercial core as a viable economic and cultural center and preserve its historic
character.
cente
Provide enough parking in the commercial core for visitors and employees.
Q Reduce the demand for employee parking through various programs such as carpooling,
van= nnlc transit subsidies n^a d hicy lie and pedestrian systems development.
Support the transportation strategy presented in the General Plan Circulation Element.
stated 40!- Except as otherwise rid widdi,
plan widrin adaptiOL, by d. eity eottricit within htidget constraints and
rongi-tent with Financial Plan =21y. nnd .• h. ... . r
The following words and phrases used throughout this plan have the following meanings:
Commercial Core is the central business district in San Luis Obispo. Its boundaries are the same
as the Downtown Association Area (see Appendix
A.1).
Commercial Deliveries are made to businesses in the commercial core using trucks that are
commercially licensed.
Downtown Association (DA) Advisory Board
is an 11- member group established pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 12.36 by the City Council
to promote the economic health of the commercial core. The DA (and its advisory committees)
participates in the development of City programs that affect the downtown and provide advise to
City staff and the City Council.
Long -Term Parking spaces may be free or metered, are located along streets, in monthly permit
lots or parking structures, and typically allow parking for 10 hours or more.
Parking Structures are multi-level buildings that are managed by the City and provide parking for
2
the general public, commercial core employees, and jurors at the Palm Street parking structure.
Short-Term Parking spaces may be free or metered and typically have a two -hour or less time
limit.
186ib@ GENERAL USE OF PARKING POLICIES
1.1 The City should maximize the use of all parking structures and surface lots.
1.2 The City should encourage any development of surface parking lots in the commercial core
to conform, to the degree possible, to the Bumitown Physicaf Phrn "race to al Physical
Plan for the C'ity'c C:enter."
1.3 Curb parking spaces are intended for short -term parking. People parking for longer periods
should use monthly permit lots and long -term metered spaces and parking structures..
1.4 The City may install parking meters or post parking time limits where at least 75% of a
block's frontage is developed with commercial uses. The City will consider requests by a
majority of residential and commercial property owners along a block to install parking
controls.
1.5 Thirty- minute parking spaces shall be placed at the ends of blocks in the commercial core
where short-term parking is needed. The City will consider requests by property owners to
locate 30- minute spaces at other locations.
1.6 Parking for commercial deliveries in the commercial core should be managed so that:
Mega] double parking or excessive circulation by delivery vehicles is discouraged.
° Deliveries are discouraged during peak traffic periods and during retail business hours.
Merchants may consider lockbox systems that allow for unassisted nighttime access for
deliveries.
Oversized vehicles do not attempt deliveries.
ACTIONS
1.7 The City will:
° Publicize the availability of parking spaces in underused lots and will offer incentives to
increase their use.
e Take actions that better direct people to parking structures and underused parking lots
and long -term metered curb a= rking areas_
7
I—
L-1
° Continue to offer permits for 10 -hour metered parking spaces.
Q Maintain long -term metered spaces on Pacific Street and along side streets near the
Marsh Street parking structure for overflow parking, but periodically evaluate their use.
1.8 The City will consider.
e Allowing the mixture of daily and monthly parking in underused permit lots.
Managing employee use of the Marsh Street parking structure so that (A) more spaces
can be reserved for shoppers, and (B) more employees are encouraged to use the Palm
Street structure, which has more vacant spaces.
1.9 City staff will periodically evaluate and revise as appropriate:
The placement of 15- and 30- minute parking meters.
The layout of existing parking lots or structures when they are resurfaced or restriped
with the aim of: (a) maximizing their use, (b) improving circulation, and (c) complying
with requirements to provide parking for the disabled.
The use of curb space in the downtown (including no parking and loading zones) to
identify opportunities for creating more short -term spaces.
Q The optimum mixture of long- and short-term metered spaces and the expansion of
metered curb areas.
1.10 If congestion levels in the commercial core exceed standards set by the Circulation
Element, the City will adopt an ordinance that limits times for commercial deliveries.
� EMPLOYEE USE OF PARKING
POLICIES
2.1 Employee parking programs will be consistent with the goals and objectives of the
Circulation Element.
2.2 The City and County should develop programs that reduce the number of their employees
that are driving alone to work.
2.3 Commercial core employers should establish programs that encourage employees to:
Use Palm Street Parking Structure, monthly permit lots, and long -term metered spaces.
• •
C3 Use other types of transportation to get to work or to carpool. A listing of Conncil-
a proved pro -rams is included ac A ndix A
ACTIONS
2.4 The City will establish a program in the commercial core that fosters carpooling by
employees and visitors.
2.5 The Downtown Association (DA) and Chamber
of Commerce should sponsor on -going education programs that discourage employees from
using curb parking and promote alternate transportation.
2.6 The City should discourage long -term employee use of curb parking in the commercial core
by:
° Expanding areas with two -hour parking limits when needed to maintain convenient
customer parking opportunities.
Monitoring the use of Band 30- minutes curb spaces;
Q Consider increasing the fines for overtime violations;
Q As requested, consider establishing resident parking districts in areas adjoining the
commercial core and office districts..
2.7 The City will institute a trip reduction program for its employees in compliance with goals
established by the Circulation Element.
2.8 The City should develop a bulk discount rate for its transit passes without negatively
affecting transit funding. Employers should purchase passes and make them available to
employees who substitute riding the bus for driving to work.
2.9 The City will install bicycle lockers at convenient locations in the commercial core and will
promote their use by commercial core employees on a space - available basis.
2.10 The City will work to with onsider park- and -ride lots that serve the commute needs of
commercial core employees. The City will evaluate outlying parking lots for their use by
commercial core employees with a shuttle connecting these lots with the core.
J
0 0
ViiiR JUROR USE OF PARKING
POLICIES
3.1 The City will provide free parking for jurors in the Palm Street parking structure or in
metered spaces when the Palm Street parking structure is full or when a juror drives an
oversized vehicle as per the agreement with the County for limited use.
ACTIONS
3.2 City staff will work with the Jury Commissioner to inform prospective jurors of the City's
parking policies. Staff will monitor the amount of jury parking and inform the Jury
Commissioner if overflow parking becomes a problem.
odd EXPANSION OF PARKING
POLICIES
4.1 Parking should be provided in the commercial core for shoppers, tourists, employees and
patrons of government and private offices.
4.2 Building parking structures is the best way of providing more parking facilities while
minimizing the use of valuable commercial land. City -owned land earmarked for parking
strictures may be used as temporary surface parking lots.
4.3 Existing City-owned surface parking lots purchased by the Parking Fund which are not
earmarked for parking structure locations may be sold to finance expansion of parking in
permanent structures when and after new parking structures have been built .to take their
place.
4.4 Parking structures and surface lots should be located along the periphery of the commercial
core as a means of eliminating traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian activities.
ACTIONS
4.5 Develop a program to encourage use of underutilized parking lots, which would benefit the
commercial core.
ENFORCEMENT
POLICIES
5.1 Parking laws will be strictly enforced to:
10
• •
Discourage overtime parking;
Q Discourage habitual parking violations -- people with six or more violations;
Encourage meter payments; and
I Direct people parking for long periods to use long -term parking spaces.
ACTIONS
5.2 City enforcement officers will strictly enforce all parking laws, especially overtime
violations and the misuse of loading zones.
5.3 The City in cooperation with the Downtown Association will develop a plan to discourage
habitual violators.
�i FINANCING OF COMMERCIAL CORE PARKING
POLICIES
6.1 The City's Parking Program will be self - supporting. The principal purpose of Parking
Fund revenues will be used to:
a) Maintain and expand parking operations and supply, including effective parking
demand reduction programs, and
b) Repay bonds that financed the construction of the parking structures.
Pilot or "test case" parking demand reduction activities may also be funded, provided that
they are well defined and monitored for a defined period of time, and a measurement of
effectiveness is predetermined.
6.2 Commercial core merchants, business owners, and property owners should help finance the
parking program.
ACTIONS
6.3 The City will deposit all revenues from parking fines into the Parking Fund.
6.4 The City will:
Review parking meter and citation rates every two years and make adjustments as
needed
Continue to charge variable rates for different types of parking.
11
• •
110.11rates in t995) mid conside, new dine . (Note: this action was_ implemer
2001.)
._.:Continue to collect in -lieu fees from development projects in the commercial core.
implemented in 2001.
Consider new fee programs applicable to commercial core merchants, business owners,
and property owners.
6.5 The City, upon Council direction, will evaluate the elimination of parking meters in the
commercial core and the creation of a comprehensive financing plan to finance the Parking
Program.
RPNEW RESIDENTIAL PARKING POLICIES
7.1 Parking along streets in residential areas should be used by residents and their guests.
However, no individual household has the exclusive right to use a particular section of curb
parking and curb parking is not guaranteed in front of each household.
7.2 The City may prohibit or limit curb parking in residential areas to ensure safe traffic flow,
pedestrian crossing conditions or to install motor vehicle or bicycle lanes consistent with the
Circulation Element or the Bicycle Transportation Plan.
7.3 The City will create residential parking districts when needed to manage parking and
maintain the quality of life in residential areas.
7.4 All residential parking districts must comply with provisions of Section 10.36.170 of the
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.
ACTIONS
7.5 Upon receiving a petition from the a 60% majority of affected residents living within a
proposed parking district, the City Council may create a district consistent with provisions
of the municipal code. (For the location of existing Residential Parking Districts, see
Appendix A.:�3)
POLICIES
PROGRAM ADNUNISTRATION AND PROMOTION
12
0 9
8.1 The City's Parking Manager is responsible for interpreting and implementing the provisions
of this plan.
8.2 As the need arises, the City will evaluate the potential for hiring a private company to
manage its parking structures.
8.3 The Parking Manager will continue to work with the
(BW, Downtown Association (DA), of Commerce, and County government to
cooperatively implement this plan.
8.4 The Parking Manager will undertake a wide range of actions to make the public aware of
the provisions of this plan.
8.5 Applications for amending the Parking Management Plan shall be filed with the City's
Parking Manager. Applications will receive an extensive review process and will be acted
on no more frequently than annually by the City Council.
A.1 Map of Downtown Parking and Business Improvement Area Showing Existing Parking
A.23 Map of Existing Residential Parking Districts
A. -a4 City Council Resolution # (1995 2002 Series) revising this plan
13
r— -- s
7 Fi�
U!
O
a
A
,,N^^
V!
U
PL �
I�
C°
D� �
O
j0�
f�mN
nOn1
_
no
0
U+
�g
aF1
�zoaaa
i O.
W W~
N
N
O
Z
N
i
p
n
N
N
r— -- s
7 Fi�
U!
O
a
A
,,N^^
V!
U
PL �
I�
C°
D� �
O
j0�
f�mN
nOn1
_
U+
�g
aF1
�zoaaa
N
W W~
N
N
/4
r— -- s
7 Fi�
U!
O
a
A
,,N^^
V!
U
PL �
I�
C°
D� �
O
C-]
E
APPENDIX A.2
Approved Parking Management and
Demand Reduction Programs
#
I Descriiption
Status
Parkine
Demand Reduction Pro ms
I
Increase the maximum charge for garage Mrk-ing,
App roved/Com feted
2
Transit Dass subsidies for downtown employees
A roved/Com leted
3
Reduce monthly parking ass costs for high-occupancy vehicles
A roved/Com leted
4
improve bicycle access to the downtown
Approved/Ongoing
5
Establish an advertising program for downtown parking demand
reduction (P R) programs
Approved/Ongoing
6
Encourage the county to establish a trip reduction program similar to the
Ci 's ro
Approved/Ongoing
Pa
*ne Mana ement Pro ms
I
Reduce free parking in garages from 90 minutes to 60 minutes
A roved/Com feted
2
Increase the in -lieu parking fee charged to new development to better
reflect the cost of downtown parking
Approved/Completed
3
Increase 2 -hour parking in the commercial core and limit long -term
parking
Approved/Completed
Respond to citizen proposals to establish residential parking districts in
nei borhoods adioining the downtown.
Approved/Ongoing
4
Increase lon -tenor parking at the periRhery of the downtown
Approved/Ongoing
5
Work with the Downtown Association to establish a program for
discouraging habitual violators
Approved/Ongoing
is
1
.t
1
1
s
F
od::u � � - •v r
zimv
�� � � � � � �
,��
�� ��
i`
�'��
G