HomeMy WebLinkAbout10226-10237�i
RESOLUTION NO. 10237 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF INCREASED PARKING CITATION FINES TO COVER STATE
AND COUNTY PARKING VIOLATION SURCHARGES, AND REPEALING
INCONSISTENT FINES IN PRIOR RESOLUTIONS
WHEREAS, State law provides, in Vehicle Code Section 40203.5, that cities establish
the amount of parking penalties, fees, and surcharges for parking violations; and
WHEREAS, State law authorizes the City to recover administrative fees, parking
penalties, fees, and collection cost related to civil debt collection, late penalties, and other related
charges; and
WHEREAS, State law imposes, pursuant to Government Code Section 76000.3(c) a
$3.00 surcharge on all parking violations paid to the City; and
WHEREAS, State law imposes, pursuant to Government Code Section 70372(b) a $4.50
surcharge on all parking violations paid to the City; and
WHEREAS, State law imposes, pursuant to Government Code Sections 76000(b),
76100, and 76101 a combined $5.00 surcharge on all parking violations paid to the City; and
WHEREAS, State law, provides in Vehicle Code Section 9559, that surcharges that
equal or exceed fifty cents are treated as one full dollar.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The City's current Parking Penalty Schedule is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2. A new Parking Penalty Schedule reflecting an increased surcharge
assessment of $13.00 per parking violation for all parking violation codes is hereby adopted as
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION 3. Increases to City fines resulting from State surcharge pass throughs shall
be repealed 60 days following the expiration or non - renewal of State legislation imposing any
such surcharge..
Upon motion of Council Member Marx, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R 10237
i
Resolution No. 10237 (2010 series)
Page 2
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
C ���r-e
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
EABIT "A"
CODE & SECTION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
DESCRIPTION
Prior
PENALTY
PENALTY
SLMC 10.12.050
INTERFERENCE WITH POLICE /AUTHORIZED OFFICER
90
93'
SLMC 10.14.030
OBEDIENCE TO TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
55
58'
SLMC 10.14.090
UNAUTHORIZED PAINTING ON CURBS
55
58
SLMC 10.36.020
STOPPING OR STANDING IN PARKWAYS PROHIBITED
30
33'
SLMC 10.36.030
STOP /STAND /PARK IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER
30
33
SLMC 10.36.040
NO PARKING ZONE - PROHIBITED PARKING- Also Taxi Zone (d)
50
53
SLMC 10.36.050
USE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES PROHIBITED
20
23
SLMC 10.36.070
REPAIRING OR GREASING VEHICLE ON PUBLIC STREET
20
23
SLMC 10.36.080
WASHING OR POLISHING VEHICLES
20
23
SLMC 10.36.090
PARKING ADJACENT TO SCHOOLS
20
23
SLMC 10.36.100
PARKING PROHIBITED ON NARROW STREETS
20
23
SLMC 10.36.110
PARKING ON GRADES
20
23
SLMC 10.36.120
UNLAWFUL PARKING- PEDDLERS, VENDORS
20
r23
SLMC 10.36.130
EMERGENCY PARKING SIGNS
20
23;
SLMC 10.36.140
LARGE/COMMERCIAL VEHICLE PARKING NEAR INTERSECTION
20
23,
SLMC 10.36.150
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF LARGE VEHICLES
20
23
SLMC 10.36.160
NIGHTTIME PARKING OF VEH W /OPERATING AIR/REFRIGERATION
20
23
SLMC 10.36.200
PARKING IN A RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA
35
• 38
SLMC 10.36.230
PERMITS - DISPLAY OF PERMITS
20
23
SLMC 10.36.233
PARKING IN YARD
45
48
SLMC 10.36.235
NO PERMIT LOT
25
28
SLMC 10.40.010
TIMED PARKING 10 MINUTES TO 10 HOURS
30
33
SLMC 10.40.020
BACKING INTO PARKING SPACE PROHIBITED
25
28
SLMC 10.40.040
PARKING PARALLEL ON ONE -WAY STREETS
18
21
SLMC 10.40.050
DIAGONAL PARKING
18
21
SLMC 10.40.060
PARKING SPACE MARKINGS
30
33
SLMC 10.40.070
NO STOPPING ZONE
18
21
SLMC 10.40.080
ALL NIGHT PARKING PROHIBITED (3 -5am)
35
39'
SLMC 10.44.020
CURB MARKING TO INDICATE NO STOPPING /PARKING REGS.
20
23.
SLMC 10.44.030
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOADIUNLOAD IN YELLOW ZONE
50
53
SLMC 10.44.040
EFFECT OF PERMISSION TO LOAD /UNLOAD IN WHITE ZONE
30
33
SLMC 10.44.050
STANDING IN ANY ALLEY
30
33
SLMC 10.44.070
HANDICAPPED PARKING
285
288
SLMC 10.48.010
CERTAIN VEHICLES PROHIBITED IN CENTRAL DISTRICT
55
58
SLMC 10.48.020
ADVERTISING VEHICLES
30
33
SLMC 10.48.030
ANIMAL DRAWN VEHICLES
30
33
SLMC 10.48.040
TRUCK ROUTES
85
Be
SLMC 10.48.050
COMM. VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING CERTAIN STREETS
85
88,
SLMC 10.48.060
MAX. GROSS WT. LIMITS OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN STREETS
85
BSi
SLMC 10.52.040
PARKING METERS - OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
20
23.
SLMC 10.52.050
UNLAWFUL TO PARK AFTER METER TIME HAS EXPIRED
30
3$
SLMC 10.52.060
UNLAWFUL TO EXTEND TIME BEYOND LIMIT
12
15,
SLMC 10.52.070
IMPROPER USE OF METER
12
'16'
SLMC 10.52.080
PARKING METERS /STANDARDS - PROPER USE
12
15,
SLMC 10.52.110
MOTORCYCLE SPACES
12
.19
CVC 5204(a)
CURRENT TAB IMPROPERLY ATTACHED
86
89
CVC 21113(a)
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS - MOVING
113
116
CVC 21113(b)
VEHICLE OR ANIMAL ON PUBLIC GROUNDS - PARKING
30
33
CVC 21113 (c)
DRIVEWAYS, PATHS, PARKING FACILITIES ON GROUNDS
30
M.
CVC 22500.1
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: FIRE LANE
113
116'
CVC 22500(a)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: WITHIN INTERSECTION
30
33,
CVC 22500(b)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: ON A CROSSWALK
30
-33!
Page 1
CODE & SECTION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PENALTY SCHEDULE
DESCRIPTION
Prior
PENALTY
PENALTY
CVC 22500(c)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: BETWEEN SAFETY ZONE
30
33
CVC 22500(d)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: W /IN 15' FIREHOUSE ENTRANCE
30
33
CVC 22500(e)
STOPPING/STANDING /PARKING: PUBLIC /PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
30
33
CVC 22500(q
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: ON SIDEWALK
30
33
CVC 22500(g)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: ALONG /OPPOSITE OBSTRUCT
30
33
CVC 22500(h)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: ON ROADWAY SIDE OF VEHICLE
30
33
CVC 22500(i)
IMPROPER PARKING IN BUS ZONE
260
263
CVC 225000)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: IN TUBE OR TUNNEL
30
33
CVC 22500(k)
STOPPING /STANDING /PARKING: UPON BRIDGE EXCEPT AUTH
30
33
CVC 22500(1)
IMPROPER PARKING IN WHEELCHAIR ACCESS
260
263
CVC 22502(a)
CURB PARKING
30
33
CVC 22502(b)
PARKING OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
30
33
CVC 22502(c)
CURB PARKING - WHEELS MORE THAN 18 INCHES FROM CURB
30
33
CVC 22504(a)
UNINCORPORATED AREA PARKING
30
33
CVC 22505(a)
PARKING ON STATE HIGHWAY WHERE SIGN POSTED
30
33
CVC 22505(b)
POSTED NO PARKING - STATE HIGHWAY
30
33
CVC 22507
UNLAWFUL PARKING
30
33
CVC 22507.8(a)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR HANDICAPPED
285
288
CVC 22507.8 (b)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR HANDICAPPED - OBSTRUCT /BLOCK
285
288
CVC 22507.8(c)(1)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR HANDICAPPED - ON LINES MARKED
285
288
CVC 22507.8(c)(2)
PARKING IN SPACE FOR HANDICAPPED - PARKING LOT
285
288
CVC 22510
PARKING IN SNOW REMOVAL AREAS
30
33
CVC 22511.7
HANDICAP ZONE
285
288
CVC 22512
VEHICLE UNATTENDED
113
116
CVC 22513
TOW CARS - PARKING ON FREEWAY
30
33
CVC 22514
FIRE HYDRANTS
60
63
CVC 22515(a)
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKES /STOP MOTOR
30
33
CVC 22515(b)
UNATTENDED VEHICLES - SET BRAKESNVHEELS /PREVENT MOVE
30
33
CVC 22516
LOCKED VEHICLE
113
116
CVC 22517
OPENING AND CLOSING DOORS
113
116
CVC 22520.5
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY
113
116
CVC 22520.5(a)
VENDING ON FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY
113
116
CVC 22521
ILLEGAL TO PARK ON RAILROAD TRACKS
30
33
CVC 22522
PARKING NEAR SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMPS
285
288
CVC 22523(a)
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT- On Highway
280
283
CVC 22523(b)
VEHICLE ABANDONMENT
280
283
CVC 22650
UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF UNATTENDED VEHICLE
113
116
CVC 22651(b)
VEHICLE PARKED /LEFT STANDING TO OBSTRUCT TRAFFIC
113
116
LATE PAYMENT PENALTY
30
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 10236A (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE
DISPOSAL OF THREE CITY -OWNED AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTIESAND
CITY MANAGER EXECUTION OF PROPERTY DISPOSAL DOCUMENTS
(GPC 110 -10)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a
public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, on October 27, 2010, for the purpose of considering application GPC 110 -10, a
proposal to sell three City-owned affordable housing properties; and
WHEREAS, California law requires that before the City acquires, or disposes of, real
property, it must refer the item to the Planning Commission for a determination of conformity
with the General Plan (Government Code Section 65402); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing
in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on
November 16, 2010, for the purpose of considering Application GPC 110 -10; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony
of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at
said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. Based upon all the evidence, the Council makes the following
findings:
1. Disposal of three City-owned affordable housing properties is consistent with General
Plan goals and policies related to affordable housing because the proceeds from the sale will
be used to support other affordable housing projects in the City and the sales will have no
impact on the affordability of the units, which are encumbered by deed - restrictions to ensure
long -term affordability.
2. The project is exempt from environmental review under Class 12, Section 15312 (Surplus
Government Property Sales), of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 2. Action. The City Council does hereby authorize the disposal of three
City-owned affordable housing properties and City Manager execution of property disposal
documents.
C C
Resolution No. 10236A (2010 Series)
Page 2
Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 16`h day of November 2010.
dj C
y r Jan Marx
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO
T.TtIsiine Dietrick
City Attorney
O O
RESOLUTION NO. 10236 (2010 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING
APPLICATION FOR NATURE EDUCATION FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDS FROM
THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY,
FLOOD CONTROL, RIVER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2006
IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPWS EDUCATIONAL KIOSK
INSTALLATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the California Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the
responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Nature
Education Facilities Program, setting up necessary procedures governing the application; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation
require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications before submission of said
applications to the State; and
WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete
the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby approves the filing of an application for grant funds from the California Department
of Parks and Recreation's Nature Education Facilities Program in support of the City's existing
educational kiosk installation program; and
1. Certifies that said applicant has or will have, prior to commencement of any work on the
project included in this application, sufficient funds to complete the project should this grant be
awarded; and
2. Certifies that the applicant has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the
project; and
3. Certifies that the applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions
contained in the contract shown in the Grant Administration Guide; and
4. Certifies that this. project is consistent with applicable City planning documents; and
5. Delegates the authority to the City Manager to conduct all negotiations, execute and
submit all documents, including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments,
and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned
project; and
6. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules,
regulations, and guidelines..
R 10236
Resolution No. 12036 (2010 Wines) O
Page 2
. Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
I i IM,
O-P orl
David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
hnshne Dietrick
City Attorney
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 10235 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1352 PACIFIC STREET TO THE MASTER LIST OF
HISTORIC RESOURCES, CHC 19 -10
WHEREAS, applicants Matt Ritter and Sara Ritter, on March 3, 2010, submitted an
application to add their contributing residence to the Master List of Historic Resources; and
WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee of the city of San Luis Obispo at a public
hearing held in the Council Meeting Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, on September 27, 2010, recommended the Council add the property located at 1352
Pacific Street to the Master List of Historic Resources; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on November 16, 2010, for the
purpose of considering adding the property located at 1352 Pacific Street to the Master List of
Historic Resources (CHC 19 -10); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony
of the applicants, interested parties, the records of the Cultural Heritage Committee hearing, and
the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The Council makes the following findings of consistency with
Historic Preservation Program Guidelines eligibility criteria for Master List Historic Resources:
1. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because the original
owner, Charles John Kelly, helped bring electricity service to the Central Coast, which had a
beneficial effect on the community.
2. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because it is associated
with a historic even that has been important to the community; the house was the first of 18
" Pedder Plan" homes constructed in the City as part of a push for affordable housing
solutions to the housing crisis following World War I.
3. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because it was designed
by the Pedder- Peppin team who played a significant role in California's history by providing
housing plans used throughout the state.
SECTION 2. Action. The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does hereby add the
property located at 1352 Pacific Street to the Master List of Historic Resources as the historic
"Charles John Kelly House ", subject to the following conditions:
R 10235
Resolution No. 10235 (2010 series)
o
Page 2
1. The historic resources is the "Pedder Plan" home only. The detached garage and second -
story dwelling unit at the rear of the property are not eligible for Mills Act benefits.
2. Historic documentation shall describe the significance of Charles John Kelly's efforts to
establish electricity service throughout the Central Coast.
SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. The City Council has determined that the
above actions do not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the California
Environmental Quality Act and are exempt from environmental review.
Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
� lQ��t,z
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
X
U
RESOLUTION NO. 10234 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1318 PACIFIC STREET TO THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC
RESOURCES, CHC 76-10
WHEREAS, applicants Thom Brajkovich and Mary Kay Harrington, on July 15, 2010,
submitted an application to add their property to the Master List of Historic Resources; and
WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obispo at a public
hearing held in the Council Meeting Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo,
California, on September 27, 2010, recommended the Council add the property located at 1318
Pacific Street to the Master List of Historic Resources; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on November 16, 2010, for the
purpose of considering adding the property located at 1318 Pacific Street to the Master List of
Historic Resources (CHC 76 -10); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony
of the applicants, interested parties, the records of the Cultural Heritage Committee hearing, and
the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The Council makes the following findings of consistency with
Historic Preservation Program Guidelines eligibility criteria for Master List Historic Resources:
1. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because it meets Historic
Preservation Guidelines Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria — Style. The
house is an excellent example of the Craftsman style with eclectic influences; has integrity;
purity of style; and, effectively conveys the historical value of the property.
2. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because it meets Historic
Preservation Guidelines Historic Significance criteria for Criteria for Building Evaluations —
Architect. The building was designed and built by a prominent architect and builder in the local
area.
3. The house is eligible for the Master List of Historic Resources because it meets Historic
Preservation Guidelines Historic Significance criteria for History — Person. Louisiana Clayton
Dart was a significant local figure who made important contributions to the community as a
preservationist, educator, and leader of local organizations.
R 10234
Resolution No. 10234 (2010 series)
Page 2
SECTION 2. Action. The Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does hereby add the
property located at 1318 Pacific Street to the Master List of Historic Resources as the historic
"Louisiana Clayton Dart House ".
SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. The City Council has determined that the
above actions do not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the California
Environmental Quality Act and are exempt from environmental review.
Upon motion of Vice Mayor Carter, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES`. None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dietrick
City Attorney
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 10233 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REGARDING
CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS
RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has designated the Administration Executive
Assistant, the Human Resources Administrative Assistant, the Legal Assistant/Paralegal and the
Human Resources Specialist as confidential employees pursuant to the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, confidential employees are precluded from collective bargaining and
therefore are not governed by a collective bargaining agreement; and
WHEREAS, the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment for
confidential employees are established by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the confidential employees of the City of San Luis Obispo met multiple times
during the month of October to identify short-term cost savings that could be accomplished in
calendar year 2011 to minimize the City's financial challenges; and
WHEREAS, the confidential group acknowledges the fiscal challenges facing the City of
San Luis Obispo and is committed to working with the City to help achieve long -term solutions in
future resolutions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby revises confidential compensation as follows:
SECTION 1. This resolution shall be in effect from January 1, 2011, through December 31,
2011.
SECTION 2. Confidential employees will not receive a cost of living increase during
calendar year 2011.
SECTION 3. Confidential employees will not receive an increase to the City's health
contribution during calendar year 2011.
SECTION 4. All other compensation and benefits afforded confidential employees under
Resolution No. 10085 (2009 Series) not superseded by the above, shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION 5. The Director of Finance and Information Technology shall reduce the
appropriate accounts to reflect the compensation changes.
R 10233
Resolution No. 10233 (2010`senes)
Page 2
Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
Ww"IF: � � WFA0,
ATTEST:
y
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lstine Dietrick
City Attorney
1 � J
RESOLUTION NO. 10232 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO REGARDING MANAGEMENT
COMPENSATION FOR APPOINTED OFFICIALS AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
AND SUPERSEDING PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT
WHEREAS, the unrepresented management employees of the City of San Luis Obispo met
multiple times during the month of October to identify short-term cost savings that could be
accomplished in calendar year 2011 to minimize the City's financial challenges; and
WHEREAS, the managers acknowledge the fiscal challenges facing the City of San Luis
Obispo and are committed to working with the City to help achieve long -term solutions in future
resolutions; and
WHEREAS, the managers have agreed to short-tern cost containment actions in calendar
year 2011.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo hereby revises management compensation as follows:
SECTION 1. This resolution shall be in effect from January 1, 2011 through December
31, 2011.
SECTION 2. Management will not receive a cost of living increase during calendar year
2011.
SECTION 3. Management will not receive an increase to the City's health contribution
during calendar year 2011.
SECTION 4. The City Manager will not receive a car allowance of $450 per month as
provided in Resolution 9440 (2003 Series) during calendar year 2011.
SECTION 5. Cash out of administrative leave will be suspended for the resolution term.
SECTION 6. The City shall continue to provide employees certain fringe benefits as set
forth in Exhibit "A ", fully incorporated by reference.
SECTION 7. The Director of Finance and Information Technology shall reduce the
appropriate accounts to reflect the compensation changes..
Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R 10232
Resolution No. 10232 (2010 series) �
Page.2
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 16th day of November 2010.
��-
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
hristine Dietrick
City Attorney
MANAGEMENT FRINGE BENEFITS 2011
Section.A Medical, Dental, Vision
EXHIBIT "A"
The City shall establish and maintain medical, dental and vision insurance plans for department
head and management employees and their dependents. The City reserves the right to choose the
method of insuring and plans to be offered.
The City has elected to participate in the PERS Health Benefit Program pursuant to the Public
Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) with the "unequal contribution option"
at the PERS minimum contribution rates, $108 per month for active employees and $97.20 for
retirees as of January 1, 2011. The City's contribution toward retirees shall be increased by 5%
per year of the City's contribution for the active employees until such time as contributions for
employees and retirees are equal.
Employees with proof of medical insurance elsewhere are not required to participate in the
medical insurance plan and may receive the unused portion of the City's contribution (after
dental and vision insurance is deducted) in cash in accordance with the City's cafeteria plan.
Those employees will be assessed $16.00 per month to be placed in the Retiree Health Insurance
Account. This account will be used to fund the City's contribution toward retiree premiums and
the City's costs for the Public Employees' Contingency Reserve Fund and Administrative Costs.
However, there is no requirement that these funds be used exclusively for this purpose, nor any
guarantee that they will be sufficient to fund retiree health costs, although they will be used for
employee benefits.
Employees will be required to participate in the City's dental and vision plans at the employee -
only rate. Should they elect to cover dependents in the City's dental and vision plans, they may
do so, even if they do not have dependent coverage for medical insurance.
Employees shall participate in term life insurance of $4,000 through payroll deduction as a part
of the cafeteria plan.
Section B Cafeteria Plan Contribution
The City's contribution to the Cafeteria Plan for regular, full -time employees will remain the
same as the 2010 amounts.
Employee Only $469 monthly
Employee + 1 $928 monthly
Employee + Family $1255 monthly
Employees with proof of medical insurance elsewhere my elect. to opt out of the City's medical
plan and receive a $200 cafeteria contribution. Employees who opted out of the City's medical
insurance coverage and were hired prior to September 1, 2008 were "grandfathered" in at the
$790 per month contribution level, until that time when they elected to be covered under the
tiered contribution structure. An employee elects to be covered under the tiered contribution
/ EXHIBIT "A"
structure when he or she enrolls as an employee only or with dependents (employee plus one or
family). At that time the employee would no longer be grandfathered in at the $790 per month
contribution, but would receive the tiered contribution amount.
Employees hired prior to September 1, 2008 that had employee only medical insurance coverage
were "grandfathered" in at the $790 per month contribution level, until such time when they
added dependents or opted out. At that time the employee would no longer be grandfathered in
at the $790 per month contribution, but would receive the tiered contribution amount.
Less than full -time employees shall receive a prorated share of the City's contribution.
The City agrees to continue its contribution to the cafeteria plan for two (2) pay periods in the
event that an employee has exhausted all paid time off due to an employee's catastrophic illness.
Section C Life and Disability Insurance
The City shall provide the following special insurance benefits in recognition of management
responsibilities:
1. Long -term disability insurance providing 66 2/3% of gross salary (maximum benefit
$5,500 per month) to age 65 for any sickness or accident, subject to the exclusions in
the long -term disability policy, after a.30 -day waiting period.
2. In addition to $4,000 term life insurance purchased by the employee through the
cafeteria plan a $100,000 term life insurance for department heads and $50,000 term
life insurance for management employees, including accidental death and
dismemberment.
Section D Retirement
The City shall provide the California Public Employees' Retirement System's (Ca1PERS) 2.7%
at 55 plan to all eligible employees including the amendments permitting conversion of unused
sick leave to additional retirement credit, the 1959 survivor's benefit (Level Four), one year final
compensation, and pre - retirement Option 2 death benefit.
The Police and Fire Chiefs shall receive the same retirement benefits as sworn personnel in their
departments.
The City agrees to pay the employee's contribution to Ca1PERS (8% for miscellaneous, 9% for
safety). These amounts paid by the City are employee contributions and are paid by the City to
satisfy the employee's obligation to contribute the current percentage of salary to Ca1PERS. An
employee has no option to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid
by the City to Ca1PERS on behalf of the employee. It is further understood and agreed that the
payment of the employee's Ca1PERS contribution is made subject to I.R.S. approval and
reporting procedures.
EXHIBIT "A"
The City shall report as salary all Employer -Paid Member_Contributions (EPMC) to CaIPERS
for the purposes of retirement credit in accordance with Government Code Section 20636 (c) (4).
Section E Supplemental Retirement
The City shall contribute 1% of salary for management employees and 2% of salary for
department heads to a defined contribution supplemental retirement plan established in
accordance with sections 401 (a) and 501 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and
California Government Code sections 53215 - 53224.
Section F Retiree Medical Trust
Management employees participate in the San Luis Obispo Employees Retiree Medical Trust.
This trust aims to provide for health insurance and other medical expense reimbursements to San
Luis Obispo City Employees Association ( SLOCEA) and management employees after
retirement. The Trust is administered separately by SLOCEA and a Board of Trustees. The City
is not involved with the establishment or administration of the Trust. Included in the funding for
the Trust will be amounts designated by SLOCEA to be deducted from each employees'
paycheck. The City's sole responsibility is to forward the designated amounts to the Trust. The
employee contribution is currently $100 per month and $6.50 per month to SLOCEA for
administration of the Trust. Details of the Trust are found in the Trust Agreement Governing the
San Luis Obispo Employees Retiree Medical Trust dated July 1, 2004.
Appointed officials and public safety chiefs have opted not to participate in the Retiree Medical
Trust.
Section G Pay for Performance
In 1996 the City Council established the Management Pay for Performance System for management
employees. The system is designed to recognize and reward excellent performance by managers
and to provide an incentive for continuous improvement and sustained high performance. Instead
of step increases, the management employee moves through his/her salary range solely according
to accomplishment of objectives and job - related behavior. Further information about the
Management Pay for Performance System can be found in the Management Pay for Performance
System Guide.
Section H Vacation
Vacation leave is governed by section 2.36.440 of the Municipal Code, except that it may be
taken after the completion of the sixth calendar month of service since the benefit date. Vacation
leave shall be accrued as earned each payroll period provided that not more than twice the annual
rate may be carried over to a new calendar year.
However, if the City Manager determines that a department head has been unable to take
vacation due to the press of City business, the City Manager may approve a two -month extension
of maximum vacation accrual. The City Manager may, within two years of appointing a
department head, increase the rate of vacation accrual to a maximum of 120 hours per year.
O EXHIBIT "A"
Vacation schedules for management employees shall be based upon the needs of the City and
then, insofar as possible, upon the wishes of the employee. A department head may not deny a
management employee's vacation request if such denial will result in the loss of vacation accrual
by the employee, except that, a department head may approve a two -month extension of
maximum vacation accrual. However, in no event shall more than one such extension be granted
in any calendar year.
Department Head and management employees are eligible, once annually in December, to
request payment for up to 40 hours of unused vacation leave provided that an employee's overall
performance and attendance practices are satisfactory.
Section I Administrative Leave
Department heads and appointed officials shall be granted 80 hours of administrative leave per
calendar year. Department heads shall have the option of taking such leave as additional paid
leave or receiving cash for up to 80 hours at year end upon approval of the City Manager. For
the 2011 calendar year, the cash out provision for department head administrative leave is
suspended.
Management employees shall be granted up to 48 hours of administrative leave per calendar
year.
Administrative leave hours shall be pro -rated when a department head or management employee
is appointed or leaves employment during the calendar year. The employee's final check will be
adjusted to reflect the pro -rated hours.
Department Heads and Managers are considered exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and not eligible for overtime payment. In general, ma nagement
employees are expected to work the hours necessary to successfully carry out their duties and
frequently must return to work or attend meetings and events outside their normal working
hours. However, when specifically authorized by the department head due to extraordinary
circumstances, a management employee may receive overtime payment of time and one -half for
hours worked above and beyond what would be considered normal work requirements during an
emergency event lasting at least eight (8) hours.
Section J Holidays
Department heads and management employees shall receive I 1 fixed plus 2 floating holidays per
year. The floating holidays shall be accrued on a semi - monthly basis and added to the vacation
accrual.
Section K Sick Leave
EXHIBIT "A"
Sick leave is governed by section 2.36.420 of the Municipal Code. An employee may take up to
16 hours per year of sick leave if required to be away from the job to personally care for a
member of his/her immediate family as defined in Section 2.36.420. This may be extended to 40
hours per year if the family member is part of the employee's household and to 56 hours if a
household family member is hospitalized and the employee submits written verification of such
hospitalization. If the family member is a child, parent or spouse, an employee may use up to 48
hours annually to attend to the illness of the child, parent or spouse, instead of the lesser
maximums above, in accordance with Labor Code Section 233.
In conjunction with existing leave benefits, department head and management employees with
one year of City service who have worked at least 1,280 hours in the previous year may be
eligible for up to 12 weeks of Family /Medical Leave in accordance with the federal Family and
Medical Leave Act and the California Family Rights Act.
Sick leave may be used to be absent from duty due to the death of a member of the employee's
immediate family as defined in Section 2.36.420, provided such leave shall not exceed forty
working hours for each incident. The employee may be required to submit proof of relative's
death before being granted sick leave pay. False information concerning the death or
relationship shall be cause for discharge.
Upon termination of employment by death or retirement, a percentage of the dollar value of the
employee's accumulated sick leave will be paid to the employee, or the designated beneficiary or
beneficiaries according to the following schedule:
(A) Death — 25%
(B) Retirement and actual commencement of Ca1PERS benefits:
(1) After ten years of continuous employment — 10%
(2) After twenty years of continuous employment — 15%
Section L Workers' Compensation Leave
An employee who is absent from duty because of on-the-job injury in accordance with State
workers' compensation law and is not eligible for disability payments under Labor Code Section
4850 shall be paid the difference between his/her base salary and the amount provided by
workers' compensation law during the first ninety (90) business days of such temporary
disability absence. Eligibility for workers' compensation leave requires an open workers'
compensation claim.
Section M Vehicle Assignment
For those department heads requiring the use of an automobile on a regular 24 -hour basis to
perform their normal duties, the City will, at City option, provide a City vehicle or an appropriate
allowance for the employee's use of a personal automobile. Department heads who are not
provided a City vehicle shall receive a car allowance of $236 per month.
EXHIBIT "A"
The use of a personal automobile for City business will be eligible for mileage reimbursement in
accordance with standard City policy.
Section N Uniform Allowance
Employees who are required to wear a uniform, including the Fire Chief, Fire Marshal and
Police Chief, shall receive the same uniform allowance as those they directly supervise.
Section O Appointed Officials
The fringe benefits outlined in this exhibit for department heads apply to appointed officials,
except where they have been modified by council resolution.
(7, i
RESOLUTION NO. 10231 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO TO SUPPORT
THE BENEFICIAL USE OF BIOSOLIDS WITHIN THE CITY AND COUNTY
OF LUIS OBISPO
WHEREAS, in efforts to enhance the community and address its needs and wishes the
City has adopted many important goals such as waste minimization, sustainability, green house
gas reduction and energy conservation; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo's Water Reclamation Facility generates over
2,000 tons of high quality biosolids annually which are hauled to Santa Barbra County for
composting; and
WHEREAS, use of biosolids as a soil amendment and/or mulch can improve soil
structure, diminish the use of synthetic fertilizers by providing essential plant nutrients and
reduce water use; and
WHEREAS, current regulations limit the use of biosolids in San Luis Obispo County
limiting local options for its beneficial reuse; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to be proactive and involved in the development and
adoption of a protective, practical and community based permanent biosolids ordinance that
would allow the greater use of biosolids within San Luis Obispo County; and
WHEREAS, the use of biosolids compost at City parks and facilities will be beneficial to
those facilities and help meet many existing City goals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows;
SECTION 1. Support the adoption of a protective, reasonable and community based
permanent county ordinance for the beneficial reuse of biosolids and authorize staff to work
towards this end; and
SECTION 2. Support the use of biosolids compost at City parks and facilities.
Upon motion of Council Member Marx, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
R 10231
I
Resolution No. 10231 (2010�Series)
Page 2
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 9th day of November 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
(7,
RESOLUTION NO. 10230 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UPHOLDING THE CITY
MANAGER'S AWARD OF CONTRACT REGARDING SEWERLINE
REPLACEMENTS 2010 -20119 PROJECT 2, SPECIFICATION No. 90938
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2010, the City Council authorized bids for the Sewerline
Replacements 2010 -2011, Project 2, Specification No. 90938 ( "Project "); and
WHEREAS, the Project's specifications required bidders to provide satisfactory
evidence showing a minimum of five years experience in installing pipe using the pneumatic
pipe bursting method, and references and qualifications for five similar Public Works projects,
with at least one project being completed under contract for a public agency; and
WHEREAS, bids were opened on September 15, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Vinciguerra Construction was the apparent low bidder, but its bid was non-
responsive because it failed to provide satisfactory evidence showing a minimum of five years
experience in installing pipe using the pneumatic pipe bursting method, and references and
qualifications for five similar Public Works projects; and
WHEREAS, Public Works notified Vinciguerra Construction that its bid was non-
responsive for failing provide satisfactory evidence showing a minimum of five years experience
in installing pipe using the pneumatic pipe bursting method, and references and qualifications for
five similar Public Works projects, and Vinciguerra was given an opportunity to clarify its bid;
and
WHEREAS, after said notification, Vinciguerra Construction did not provide
clarification showing its submittal provided the required references demonstrating five years
experience in installing pipe using the pneumatic pipe bursting method, and references and
qualifications for five similar Public Works projects; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2010, based on the recommendation of Public Works, the
City Manager awarded the contract for the Project to D'Arcy & Harty Construction, the second
lowest, bidder because Vinciguerra Construction's bid was rejected for being non - responsive and
D'Arcy's bid was responsive on its face.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo upholds the City Manager's award of contract to D'Arcy & Harty Construction, Inc., in
the amount of $454,246 for the Project, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the contract.
R 10230
Resolution No. 10230 (2010)ries)
Page 2
Upon motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on the
following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 9th day of November 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 10229 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING UPDATED
HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
(GPI 72 -09)
WHEREAS, in February 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6158
establishing Historical Preservation Program Guidelines in order to promote preservation of
historic buildings and sites and maintain our community's heritage; and
WHEREAS, the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines were amended by City
Council Resolution No. 6857 in August 1990 but have not been updated since that time; and
WHEREAS, program 3.6.3 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General
Plan specifies that the Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission will
provide specific guidance on the construction of new buildings within historic districts; and
WHEREAS, program 3.6.10 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the
General Plan indicates that the City will implement recommendations of the Cultural Heritage
Committee's "whitepaper "; and
WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee prepared the Updated Draft Guidelines
based on General Plan policies and public input received at nine public hearings; and
WHEREAS, at its June 28, 2010 meeting the Cultural Heritage Committee endorsed the
June 2010 Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (GPI 72 -09); and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on September 21, 2010, October 5,
2010, and November 9, 2010 and to consider the proposed Guidelines and changes made in
response to public input; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Cultural Heritage Committee's
recommendation and the Community Development Deputy Director's determination that
adoption of updated Historic Preservation Program Guidelines is categorically exempt from
environmental review because it consists of an action by a regulatory agency, as authorized by
state or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows /or that (whatever action is needed):
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. Council concurs with the Director's
determination that the proposed Historic Preservation Program Guidelines update is
Categorically Exempt from environmental review (Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory
Agencies for Protection of the Environment). It consists of an action by a regulatory agency as
R 10229
Resolution No. 10229 (2010 6eries)
Page 2
authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or
protection of the environment.
SECTION 2. Guidelines Approval. The updated Historic Preservation Program
Guidelines are hereby approved as recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee and
amended by Council and will become effective upon the associated Historic Preservation
Ordinance, introduced on the 9t' day of November 2010, becoming effective.
Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh and Marx, Vice Mayor Carter and Mayor
Romero
NOES: Council Member Settle
ABSENT`. None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 9th day of November 2010.
i
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO
r Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
ell I j,lx itll �' city of
1 ° san WI s OBI spo
hmtomc pResenvatmn
pRoqRam qlll6el illes
mss' <�;: - •, v
e - s� �iwF•m" r�
�^ T
L�
Cerro San Luis (left), Bishop's Peak and the Town of San Luis Obispo, 1892
nOVCMBCR 2010
l_ n
City of San Luis Obispo
historic paesenvation
pnoqjRam Guiaet,nes
Adopted by City Council Resolution No 10229 (2010 Series)
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL
Dave Romero, Mayor
John Ashbaugh Jan Howell Marx
Andrew Carter, Vice Mayor Allen Settle
CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE
Dan Carpenter, Chairperson
Barbara Breska Buzz Kalkowski
Hemalata Dandekar Enrica Costello
Katy Davis Jeff Oliveira
City Administration
Katie Licthtig, City Manager
Michael Codron, Interim Assistant City Manager
Brigitte Elke, Administrative Analyst
Community Development Department
John Mandeville, Community Development. Director
Kim Murry, Deputy Director for Long Range Planning
Tim Girvin, Chief Building Official
Jeff Hook, Senior Planner
Mary Phillips, Planning Intern
Amber Piona, Planning Intern
Architectural Graphics by Craig Smith
City of San Luis Obispo
919 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 -3218
-1-
taBle of contents
i J
Page
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Foreword ................................................................................... ..............................4
1.2 Our Town — San Luis Obispo ...................................................... ..............................5
1.3 Why Preserve San Luis Obispo's History? ................................... .............................6'
Chapter 2: Historic Preservation Program
2.1 How to Use These Guidelines ...................................................... ..............................7
2.2 Related Standards and Policies .................................................... ..............................7
Chapter 3: Treatment of Historic Resources
3.1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with Historic Resources .......... 9
3.2 Construction in Historic Districts ................................................. .............................10
3.3 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts ............................... .............................15
3.4 Changes to Historic Resources ..................................................... .............................15
3.5 Reconstruction of Historic Resources ........................................... .............................17
Chapter 4: Preservation Tools and Incentives
4.1 Cultural Resource Preservation and Incentive Programs .............. .............................19
Chapter 5: Appendices
5.1 Historic Architectural Styles of San Luis Obispo ...................... .............................21
5.2 Historic District Descriptions .................................................... .............................33
5.3 Contributing List of Historic Resources .................................... .............................56
5.4 Master List of Historic Resources ..................:.::............. .............................68
5.5 Definitions .................................................................................. .............................72
5.6 Works Cited and Information Links .......................................... .............................79
5.7 Council Resolution ..................................................................... .............................82
FIGURES
1 Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo ............................................. .............................10
2. Examples of New Development in Historic Districts ................... ............................... 11
3. Examples of Massing of new Development in Historic Districts ... .............................12
4. Commercial In -fill Construction in Historic Districts, Overview .. .............................13
5. Commercial In -fill Construction in Historic Districts, Detailed ..... .............................14
6. Additions to Historic Resources ..................................................... .............................17
7. Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo ............................................ .............................33
-2-
(..�L •.may �l a - f_ Y _
J \ G
Higuera at Marsh Street, looking northeast, ca. 1920s
-3-
chap tee 1: Dntw6uction
1.1 Foreword
These guidelines were developed by the City of San Luis Obispo's Cultural Heritage Committee
(CHC), a group of seven citizens appointed by the City Council to advise and educate the public
and decision makers on historic resource preservation. Historic resources include buildings and
other structures, sites, landscapes, and other features that are significant in San Luis Obispo's
history. Interest in historic preservation arises out of the community's desire to explain our past
and serve as guideposts to the future. Federal, state and local governments have passed laws to
protect historic properties that enjoy special merit based on age, architectural style, period,
architect, owners or occupants and/or materials used.
These guidelines reference those laws, but are sensitive to our community's special heritage as a
California Mission community. As an advisory committee to the City Council, the CHC reviews
development proposals to determine their effect on the City's historic districts. These guidelines
apply to both private and public properties that either have or are considered to be historic
resources. The maintenance and preservation of historic sites, structures, and objects is
important to the community, and is a key factor in the City's popularity with tourists and in San
Luis Obispo's strong "sense of place." To that end, we are all stewards in the preservation and
upkeep of our community's rich heritage.
el
From Terrace Hill, looking toward Chorro Valley, with Santa Rosa Street at the left, ca. 1890.
1.2 Our Town — San Luis Obispo
Native Americans inhabited California's central coast, including the San Luis Obispo area, as
early as 10,000 years B.C. Chumash and Salinan tribes benefitted from the region's mild
climate, abundant resources and natural beauty. As a result, the Santa Barbara -San Luis Obispo
region supported one of the most densely populated areas of pre- historic California. In the mid -
16`h century, Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo landed on the central coast in what was later to become
Santa Barbara County, and began a period of dramatic change coinciding with the arrival of
Europeans. By the late 18`h century, San Luis Obispo had become one of 21 communities in
California founded by Franciscan missionaries. The Franciscans came to convert the Native
Americans to Christianity and to strengthen Spain's control over Alta California. The mission
church became the catalyst for the town's continued development; its plaza was a gathering place
for work, trade and festivities. Around the mission, Chumash Indians built tule huts over willow
frames while the first soldier - settlers and craftspeople constructed small adobe houses. Each
group built structures in keeping with their particular cultural background and drawing from
materials immediately at hand.
The transition of California from Indian to Spanish to Mexican to American control also brought
many changes in construction methods, architectural styles and uses of materials. Many of these
cultural periods are still represented in San Luis Obispo's architectural heritage. As the early
community grew, people from around the globe brought their culture, skills and ways of life.
Consequently, San Luis Obispo's diversity in architectural styles and heritage reflects that
diversity and enhances our quality of life.
i \
u l
. � _. "�. t ...1117 Y Y•`' •, �'.'� 'n rl� .F i ,.< li♦
Southern Pacific Railroad "Daylight " locomotive on the outskirts of San Luis Obispo, 1937
-5-
1.3 Why Preserve San Luis Obispo's History? ...,
The Town of San Luis Obispo began with the founding of the Old Mission in 1772. Over the
past two centuries the community has experienced many changes. These changes can be
appreciated because many of the older building and historic sites are still present. One has only
to visit the central business district or wander through surrounding residential areas to imagine
what is must have been like before the introduction of automobiles, flat screen television and
computers.
San Luis Obispo is blessed with original historic buildings and distinctive historic districts that
many communities envy. Historic resources lend a sense of permanence and continuity;
however, in some respects they are also fragile and vulnerable. The values and character they
impart can easily be lost through neglect, demolition and inappropriate remodeling. The City of
San Luis Obispo has been fortunate to have owners who care about the history of their
community and have undertaken the costly and time - consuming task of restoring, maintaining
and enhancing their historic homes and commercial buildings. Their efforts have enhanced the
distinctive character of the community. Historic features have community benefits beyond their
aesthetic qualities and educational value. San Luis Obispo's historic sites, buildings and other
aspects of our "living history" are irreplaceable resources. They are important to the
community's economic vitality, quality of life, and unique sense of place.
To promote understanding and an appreciation of its history, San Luis Obispo citizens have
established these Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (hereafter "Guidelines "). By
working with property owners, developers, neighborhood and civic groups and citizens, the
community intends to preserve the most important historic and architecturally significant
buildings and sites.
These Guidelines are administered by a seven - member citizens' group appointed by the City
Council called the Cultural Heritage Committee ( "CHC "). The duties of the CHC are further
described in the Historic Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 14.1 of the Municipal Code). The
Committee is assisted by staff in the San Luis Obispo Community Development Department
( "the Department "). To contact the CHC or for more information, visit the Department at 919
Palm Street in San Luis Obispo, or contact the Department at (805) 781 -7170, or
www.slocity.or .
M
chapter 2: histoRic pneseRvation pRociRam
2.1 How to Use These Guidelines
Historic preservation starts during the early stages of project planning and design. Property
owners, developers, builders, design professionals and others involved in public or private
development can use these guidelines to anticipate concerns and to design their projects to
protect important historic resources and avoid delays during development review and
construction. Highlights of where to find information in this document are listed below:
a) To determine whether a property is currently listed on either the Contributing or Master List of
Historic Resources see Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of the Appendices. To see if a property is located
within a Historic District see Figure 1.
b) For an explanation of treatment of Historic Properties, including construction in Historic
Districts and on properties with listed Historic Resources; and information on what is required in
a historic preservation report see Section 3.1 -3.5.
c) For an overview of historic preservation tools and incentives offered by the City see Section
4.1.
d) For information about the historic architectural styles of structures found in San Luis Obispo
or the predominant character of the historic districts, see Sections 5.1 and 5.2.
2.2 Related Standards and Policies
Historic preservation is one of many community goals in the General Plan. It is part of the
community's core values and identity. Preservation embodies the fundamental belief that
sustainable, successful communities are those that respect, preserve and celebrate their history
and unique character. To help ensure these valuable and finite resources will continue to
enhance the lives of San Luis Obispo generations to come, the City Council has adopted several
documents, in addition to these Guidelines, that help protect these resources. They include:
a) General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element, adopted by Council Resolution No.
9785 (2006 Series) — Establishes citywide policies and programs regarding identification
and treatment of cultural resources.
b) Historic Preservation Ordinance, San Luis Obispo Municipal Code 14.1 — Discusses the
CHC, its duties and describes procedures, historic listing criteria and procedures,
provisions for demolition and relocation of historic structures, and economic hardship
provisions.
c) Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, adopted by Council
Resolution No. 10120 (2009 Series) — Establishes procedures to be used for the
protection of sub - surface cultural resources, both historic and pre- historic features.
7-
d) Community Design Guidelines, adopted by Council Resolution No. 9391 (2002 Series) —
Establishes site and architectural design standards for development projects, including
projects involving historic resources and historic districts, and demolitions.
e) Demolition and Moving of Buildings — Appendix Chapter 2, Chapter 201 General, San
Luis Obispo Municipal Code — Establishes procedures and requirements for the
relocation or demolition of historic buildings.
f) Safety Assessment Placards — Buildings and Construction Title 15.48, San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code — Establishes procedures and requirements for post- disaster actions.
g) San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations, Chapter 17.54 — Establishes the Historical
Preservation Overlay Zone (H) and describes its purposes and application, allowed uses
and property development standards.
These documents are available at the Department, or on the City's website at www.slocity.org.
r �
o -
o
D
i
Historic district, Johnson Avenue between Palm and Mill Streets
chapteu 3: tueatment of histouic uesomces
3.1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with Historic
Resources
3.1.1 Conformance with design standards. Construction in historic districts and on properties
that contain listed historic resources shall conform with the goals and policies of the General
Plan, the Historic Preservation Ordinance, these Guidelines, the Community Design Guidelines,
any applicable specific or area plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties.
3.1.2 Review of development projects. The Director shall refer a development project
application for a property located within a historic district or on a property with a listed Historic
Resource to the CHC for review, unless the Director determines the project is:
(a) Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and
(b) Designed such that it would have no effect on Historic or Archaeological Resources,
and
(c) Consistent with 3. 1.1 above.
3.1.3 Approval conditions. The CHC may recommend conditions or environmental mitigation
measures for construction in historic districts or on properties that contain listed historic
resources. The Director, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council may impose conditions of
approval and /or environmental mitigation measures for planning actions affecting Historic and
Archaeological Resources.
3.1.4 Environmental review. Development projects on properties that contain listed historic
resources, and on properties located within historic districts shall be considered environmentally
sensitive pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and require at a
minimum, an initial study to evaluate the project's potential effects on the resource unless the
Director determines the project:
(a) does not involve:
1) a significant change to the exterior (or interior, subject to Section 3.4.5) of a
historic structure, or
2) relocation or demolition of part or all of a historic or potentially historic structure,
or
3) grading on a listed historic property or identified archaeological site.
or
(b) is minor or incidental and has no potential to adversely affect cultural resources.
lR
3.2 Construction in Historic Districts
Figure 1 - Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo, 2010
city of San LUIS O61SPO
histouic aistizicts
MN Strout
Dawntown
. t "
- y �sourH_._ Railros ;; r
—f--
o wu 02S as i-
-I
� �- A41n
3.2.1 Architecturally compatible development within Historic Districts. New structures in
historic districts shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the district's prevailing
historic character as measured by their consistency with the scale, massing, rhythm, signature
architectural elements, exterior materials, siting and street yard setbacks of the district's historic
structures, as described in Figures 2 and 3. New structures are not required to copy or imitate
historic structures, or seek to create the illusion that a new building is historic.
-10-
3.2.2 Architectural compatibility. The CHC reviews development in historic districts for
architectural compatibility with nearby historic resources, and for consistency with applicable
design and preservation policies, standards, and historic district descriptions in Section 5.2. New
development should not sharply contrast with, significantly block public views of, or visually
detract from, the historic architectural character of historically designated structures located
adjacent to the property to be developed, or detract from the prevailing historic architectural
character of the historic district.
Figure 2- Examples of New Development in Historic Districts
MILVlmr5 MA1561ifi7Rfn%NP PaElf"
COMFONeNT6 VON F£LhfE To TR5
t }-KK *I R16MF1C4L f!VeMENT5 OF
7H6 Ne G--M2V aV- .
$IJII,fJfNG thAJ� FOf!A1 Mrn .D651GN _.._ ..
COMPONPNT5 �-ro eNf0NG _..r..
H {�ORIG AL STRt:LTURF�i ...._.
.,
., � iii
1 il��l
II I
� �1DIIU�IIIIIIUf� i �� �
I�Irl�l�
\LI
eUII.PIN6 ffA05 foRM ANP P%00
60MPONBN't5 jP 'N EXISTING ...
HISfDRIGAt� JiFttTURES '
'� =!I I I_I �`I
., � iii
1 il��l
� �1DIIU�IIIIIIUf� i �� �
I�Irl�l�
\LI
MM.y ,FO A Awv msiow 60MON%T FeLATIOfRM
-II -
Figure 3 - Examples of Massing of New Development in Historic Districts
Htzv 5tx�tvFe
RILLS IN EL2MEllir—
PE4�t5nN
HOF-rtMTAL UAES
F TfPE i PITCH
E(115flw- 57W. Pge6
Or T
OP 7+1£ F.�CStiNG
�lN TFK T/
D167RIG.T�
H1.8WRLCA- 0L"T T
1500 C4Y6RE'O ENTRY
Tr-422L
NE=W }+ bRHOnp
r
„FLAT F C": NOr �VKFA1 N O
W
4�,
d
.4
MA661NO OF GTTROCTUR,e
-12-
0r,�
i Ippla_I �
I•I�
��I
a
_
I,I
W
4�,
d
.4
MA661NO OF GTTROCTUR,e
-12-
0r,�
Figure 4 - Examples of Commercial In -fill in Historic Districts
COMkE -C W, fN-f L4,
60KraMIT -AL. Vev"
GOMNV.$-CtA1, IN-Flu,
LONTEMPOMFY DE51"
-13-
'J
Figure 5 - Commercial In -fill in Historic Districts- Details
Exh�nwv Nets IN fiw a IUR�
M
UPPER LEVEL 6rr::P
OAcr PROM Of PiT
6WrEP PAPA(2T
"fD LE�f✓f?E.1 Ml�fj
flow orrrA� ALA6NM9NT
OF NEW fh e. K& trrw
T E7QSffA , rACAM
NirTHM ANIO tCAi.E Or
NOVV WINOOWK KF_L NT_6
-m. e4on M&
VIrr`Y 5PP>GI i LgcATf ON
AD PF9rOR-7M R6LwY5
-M fald6amGl
NDE5irA- 10 01,m Ic I)I ✓�Icr
PROPOfTorL4L VFKT'I6A1-
M i5' KG "r) f5 4 f
RElIM-S V exyiS; 6>
NARIEONrA-L AUGNMEMr
of New rAchoC M�
I To r_-clsnRc. rA' t0r-.
C.O"ff$ZIAL- IN -RU. IN ftpr-IG P674CT
(COMM -MLAI. DFBIGN�
-14-
Aa0 �'YrLE Of
NEW WINDOWS FE(dflES
"!a EXI9nN�
PWOF TONAL VEFTICA(_
IT70FH'tTffN�
R50trr rf I.HTi 5 7D
EKI -IwNo
6writ-" Fncclw, OCA9I0N
AND MzOrOFOVA RELATES_
50.51NG
C.O"ff$ZIAL- IN -RU. IN ftpr-IG P674CT
(COMM -MLAI. DFBIGN�
-14-
� n
U
3.3 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts
3.3.1 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts. Listed Historic Resources located outside
of historic districts shall be subject to the same protection and regulations applicable to historic
resources within historic districts.
3.4 Changes to Historic Resources.
Projects involving an alteration or relocation of a listed historic resource require CHC review, as
described below:
3.4.1 Alterations to Historic Resources.
(a) Application. An application to alter a listed historic resource shall be made on forms
provided by the Department, including applicable fees and any supplemental information as
required to explain the request.
(b) Minor alterations. For minor alterations to listed historic resources, the Director may
approve upon making the finding that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and these Guidelines. If this finding
cannot be made, the Director will refer the matter to the CHC for review and comment.
(c) Accessory structures. New accessory structures should complement the primary
structure's historic character through compatibility with its form, massing, color, and materials.
(d) Additions. Additions to listed historic structures should maintain the structure's original
architectural integrity and closely match the building's original architecture, or match additions
that have achieved historic significance in their own right, in terms of scale, form, massing,
rhythm, fenestration, materials, color and architectural details.
(e) Historic preservation report required. If CHC review of a project is required, a historic
preservation report shall be prepared at the applicant's cost unless this requirement is waived by
the Director due to the minor nature of the project or because information is otherwise available
to enable informed review of the proposed project. The report will be used to determine if the
proposal can be found consistent with the findings in subsection (f).
Report content. A historic preservation report shall require CHC approval. The report shall be
prepared by a qualified professional unless waived by the Director and shall be based on these
guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and
shall include the following:
(1) The historic context, period of significance and character - defining features.
(2) An architectural history of the resource which includes:
- 15 -
-Photographs and drawings. which identify the original building, structure, object,
and site configuration,
-Character defining features of the resource as originally constructed,
-Alterations, including those alterations made over time that have achieved status as
character defining features, even though not a part of the original resource, and
*Alterations not consistent with maintaining the historic integrity of the resource.
(3) A program for repair, rehabilitation and preservation of the resource, including a
statement of how the proposed program meets the identified treatment option from
the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
(f) Consistency required. Alterations to listed historic resources shall be approved only upon
finding that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties, any required historic preservation report, General Plan policies,
the Historic Preservation Ordinance, and these Guidelines.
Rehabilitation of the historic
Righetti House. 2007
3.4.2 Percent of historic resource to be preserved.
Alterations of historically- listed buildings shall retain at
least 75% of the original building framework, roof, and
exterior bearing walls and cladding, in total, and reuse
original materials to the maximum extent possible.
Proposed alterations of greater than 25% of the original
building framework, roof, and exterior walls will be subject
to the review process for demolitions. Alterations do not
include ordinary repair or maintenance that is exempt from
a building permit or is consistent with the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Resources.
3.4.3 Retention of character- defiming features.
Alterations of historically- listed buildings shall retain
character defining features. New features on primary and
secondary building facades, or features visible from a public
area, should be completed in a manner that preserves the
original architectural character, form, scale, and appearance
of the building.
3.4.4 Exterior building changes. Exterior changes to historically- listed buildings or resources
should not introduce new or conflicting architectural elements and should be architecturally
compatible with the original and/or prevailing architectural character of the building, its setting
and architectural context. Additions to historic buildings shall comply with the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards to complement and be consistent with the original style of the structure.
Building materials used to replicate character- defining features shall match the original materials
in terms of size, shape, quality and appearance.
WOM
C
Figure 6 - Additions in Historic Districts
-AG+��IaN H+v 51mtCnR.
TO
EXlf1RNG 6���`
IT VL
f.
AOP4110N 15 OVT- OP-x}i.e
[W Oi&G -0 aPfTIRG
60C WM F_
kg'06146 OF A NEW AVOMON IN A RtmrticA. Newftos4mp
3.4.5 Interior building changes. Interior changes to publicly - accessible listed historic buildings
whose architectural or historic significance is wholly or partially based on interior architectural
characters or features shall preserve and restore significant interior architectural features.
3.4.6 Acquired historic significance. Changes to listed historic resources that the Director or
the CHC determines to have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained
and preserved.
3.5 Reconstruction of Historic Resources
3.5.1 Historic building codes. Reconstruction of listed historic structures should preserve the
original historic character of the historic resource to the maximum extent possible; use of
California Historic Building code is encouraged to accomplish such preservation.
3.5.2 Consistency with Standards. Reconstruction shall follow the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards, and shall be based on conclusive evidence such as architectural plans, photos, as -built
drawings and other reliable and accurate information.
3.5.3 Minor variations. The Director or the ARC, on recommendation by the CHC, may
approve minor variations from the original design to meet code requirements; provided the
overall architectural character is maintained and character defining features are accurately
recreated.
-17-
� n
Obispo Theater, Monterey at Court Street, demolished in
-18-
1
_ _ �� tai- �OBI5P01���.'�rOB15P0��i'
j�
i
L ^S urav F'
Obispo Theater, Monterey at Court Street, demolished in
-18-
chaptCR 4: p>zesenvation tools ana incentives
4.1 Cultural Resource Preservation Incentives and Benefit Programs
The City intends to establish and maintain incentives to support and encourage the identification,
preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction and continued use of historic and cultural
resources. The City Council may offer these or additional preservation incentives to property
owners of listed historic resources, as budget and /or funding sources allow:
4.1.1 Reconstruction after loss. Subject to Director approval, historic resources damaged or
destroyed by fire or natural disasters may be reconstructed to match their historic appearance as
existing before the damage without complying with development standards for setback, lot
coverage, height, parking requirements or other Zoning Regulations.
4.1.2 Modified development standards. Property development standards in the Zoning
Regulations and Parking and Driveway Standards may be relaxed by an Administrative Use
Permit, following procedures set forth in SLOMC Chapter 17.58, if the modifications facilitate
the preservation and/or rehabilitation of a historic resource, or serve to reduce or eliminate
impacts of development to a historic resource.
4.1.3 Use permit review. (A) To apply for a Use Permit under this Chapter, the property owner
or owner's agent shall submit a planning application, fee and supporting information to the
Department. The application shall include a historic preservation report, as described in these
Guidelines. The CHC shall evaluate whether the proposed land use and related building
modifications are consistent with these guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for the Treatment of Historic Properties conformance reasonably necessary to preserve or
rehabilitate the historic resource, and shall report its findings to the Director. (B) In granting a
Use Permit, the Director shall make the findings pursuant to SLOMC Chapter 17.58, including
these specific findings:
(a) Impacts of the use, including traffic and parking, would not be detrimental to the
surrounding area.
(b) Flexible development standards and/or uses conform to an approved historic preservation
report and are necessary for the preservation and/or rehabilitation of an historic resource.
(c) Preservation agreements, contracts or fagade easements between the property owner and
City that would provide for preservation, restoration or rehabilitation of exterior or interior
features of an historic resource may be required as a condition of the Use Permit.
4.1.4 Rehabilitation tax credits and grants. Historic resources may be eligible for the State
Historical Building Code, Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits, Mills Act Property Tax Reduction
Program, Community Development Block Grant and other programs that may be established by
state, federal, or non - profit agencies, or by the City Council.
-19-
4.1.5 Historic and faVade easements. , Property owners may dedicate historic or fagade
easements to the City or to a non -profit organization to preserve cultural and historic resources.
Such dedication may qualify for fee waivers, rehabilitation grants, permit streamlining, Mills Act
program participation or other incentives, subject to the approval of the City Council.
4.1.6 Transfer of development credit. For projects that preserve cultural or historic resources
on site, the City may enter into an agreement to transfer development credit or density to another
appropriate site proportional to the commercial floor area or number of dwellings possible to
develop under current zoning if the resource were removed.
4.1.7 Fee waiver or reduction. A property owner may apply for the waiver or reduction of
planning, building and engineering application and permit fees for designated historic resources.
The City Council may waive some or all fees if it can be demonstrated that the waiver will assist
in the preservation of a designated historic resource.
4.1.8 Financial assistance. With City Council approval, the City may use the Historic and
Cultural Resource Preservation Trust Fund, State or Federal grants, affordable housing funds or
other funding to achieve historic preservation objectives, especially for exceptional preservation
projects where multiple community objectives such as affordable housing, historic preservation,
removal of spot blight, or more sustainable property development can be achieved with such
assistance.
4.1.9 Historic plaque program. Upon available funding, the City may provide standard historic
plaques for designated historic properties and at no or reduced cost to property owners. High
quality bronze historic plaques will be available to purchase through the City at manufacturer's
cost plus handling.
4.1.10 Historic library. Property owners of historic properties shall have use of the CHC
reference library in the Department.
-20-
cnaptCR 5: appendices
5.1 Historic Architectural Styles of San Luis Obispo
Architectural Style
In surveying the City's historic resources, several generalized architectural style categories have
been identified to describe the architectural heritage of the City: Spanish Colonial, Victorian,
Spanish Eclectic, Craftsman, Main Street or Traditional American Commercial, Period Styles,
and Post -World War II. The local mixture of styles reflects the desire of early San Luis Obispo
residents and business owners to emulate the architectural styles prevalent in larger urban areas
in the United States — styles which were themselves influenced by historic European
architectural styles.
In San Luis Obispo, most American architectural styles are present in large and small versions.
Some are camouflaged by out -of- character additions or remodels; others represent a combination
of styles adapted to the budgets, materials, skills and design preferences prevalent in San Luis
Obispo during the building's period of construction (vernacular design). Thus, the architectural
renderings below show styles as they should look in a traditional sense, and not all architectural
elements will be present in a historic building of that style. To preserve the integrity and value
of historic buildings, maintenance, repairs, remodels or additions should preserve or closely
match " character - defining" architectural elements of that style, and not introduce extraneous or
incompatible architectural features.
Spanish Colonial or Adobe
Spanish Colonial style adobes were the first permanent structures in San Luis Obispo, beginning
with the Mission from which the town derived its name. Construction of the Mission began in
the late 1780's, but it was not until the early 19`h century that adobe buildings became common.
From the 1820s to the mid- 1800s, the predominate type of structure was of adobe, and in a style
characterized by small, single -story structures, thick adobe walls, low sloping tile roofs and
wood detailing. These early Spanish Colonial Style buildings, also referred to as simply
"Adobe" style buildings, did not survive, but a few good examples from the mid- to late 1800s
remain, such as the historic Rodriguez Adobe and the Rosa Butron Adobe.
Adobe refers not only to the building type or style, but also to the type of construction. Adobe
structures must, by definition, be built (at least partially) with adobe bricks — large, unfired bricks
made with clay -type soil mixed with straw. The unreinforced adobe walls typically vary from
one and one -half to six feet thick, resting on a dirt or rock foundation. Roofs are typically tile or
wood shingle, resting on wooden roof timbers. Door and window openings are normally
surrounded by heavy timbers, often with a prominent timber lintel above window and door
openings. Also, there are often arches and porches. If there is a second story it usually has a
balcony with railings, a variation often referred to as the "Monterey Style." A little over half of
the remaining adobes in and around San Luis Obispo, most were built in the second half of the
1800s. Many were altered through the years with the addition of wood siding, composition
roofing, and exterior finishes that in some cases, obscured the adobe structure beneath.
-21-
Clapboard siding was commonly used to protect adobe blocks from weathering, or to create a
more stylish, ornamental appearance. In some cases, adobes were covered with a stucco or
plaster finish.
LOW %MNG TIL,.R66rf" r- fWAV'( WOODEN R70F
OR, Ff 7 PGt7f6 —� / ?IMeef -5
ARO6E ORIGKS WITR
rGA5TER PINI9H-
-7.1tGNE5 GF' DO0R5
{ OPawk006
Examples of this style:
Sauer /Adams Adobe, 964 Chorro St
The Murray Adobe, 474 Monterey St
The Hays /Lattimer Adobe at 642 Monterey.
-22-
Victorian
What is generally known as "Victorian style" actually refers to a constellation of styles popular
during the 1860s to the early 1900s. Common to this architectural style are examples of
European interpretations of classical architecture, including such styles as Gothic Revival, Stick
and Eastlake, Queen Anne and Folk Victorian. Many houses within the Old Town and
Downtown Historic Districts fall into this general category, often incorporating elements from
different styles. This architectural style represents the more ornate, higher quality wood frame
structures built between the late 1800s and the mid- 1920s.
Characteristic features include:
- symmetrically arranged, double -hung windows - diamond shaped roof shingles
-oval or narrow, tall windows - highly detailed ornamental elements
- turret and cupola roofs - prominent wood steps and porch
- shingle fagade or roof gable ends - post pier foundation
-steep gable or hip roofs - raised foundations
` mml. PI TC45P
CIN" RODP5 —
Gf.COfRTIVB FtAi1A`E
APEX OP C-tV,E AZF
ynawarRlcA+r oR
nhTMxerRlGAt. PKAGf:
C01nPO5ffI0N
a=cofwnve j m ICATe
6RA4,-CT, 5(INI7 r:WOF-K
q ORNAMV A - fiLCM2HT'
Examples of this style:
The Erickson House at 687 Islay Street
The Righetti House, 1314 Palm Street
The Stanton House, 752 Buchon Street
-23-
TUIP6:E7 AND CUPOLA
RGn( ✓G(RIY.'tUf�
Sf iva_e WOFK IN
Fa e ENo, A6O/&
51RN5
Srnrnertcical, w�R�rnv�
R312�E -HUNG, EXIERIOIC.
W1N00 W5
WIOe 5IwP5
6CN81zCu5
CF? WITk
Folk Victorian
r�
A Victorian style characterized by simple housing forms with less elaborate detailing than other
Victorian houses. Detailing is located primarily along the porch and cornice line. Folk Victorian
houses often borrow detailing from Queen Anne and Italianate styles.
Characteristic features include:
- symmetrically arranged, double -hung windows - diamond shaped roof shingles
-oval or narrow, tall windows - prominent wood steps and porch
- shingle fagade or roof gable ends - post pier foundation
-steep gable or hip roofs - raised foundations
Examples of this style include:
756 Palm Street
855 Toro Street.
-24-
ICRI:LY
a,
ucbwa
TRt.L,
P..
Mupo nog
n
Colonial Revival/Neoclassical
The Colonial Revival style refers to a revival style popular in the early twentieth century that was
inspired by the early houses of the Atlantic seaboard. Compared to the highly detailed
ornamental elements and asymmetry that defined the Victorian styles, Colonial Revival buildings
are symmetrical and relatively austere. Colonial Revival buildings are based on Georgian,
Federal, and Dutch Colonial styles and are often fused with Neoclassical decorative elements
such as classical porch columns.
Closely related to the Colonial Revival style, the Neoclassical style was a popular style in San
Luis Obispo from 1900 to the 1920s. Neoclassical style encompasses both the Classic Box and
the Neoclassic Rowhouse. " Rowhouse" as used here refers to detached houses often seen in a
row.
Characteristic features include:
- hipped or gambrel roof
- symmetrical
N,WW CVOR V4406
WITR rilOCAW 0MT5
i eftt"
aA551GAI. etW TY
!"U"OuuoS WITES
EM6EU.16(tmemlrl
carry; v ot� e kl mceo
AccEnCr W(mWw TD
7TfY�i' ff� 61G£
v
Z4 ac �
Examples of this style include:
1059 Leff Street,
The Bradbury Sanitarium, 743 Leff,
The Bullard House, 1624 Mono Street.
- raised wood porch with free - standing columns
- dormer windows
-25-
dj,r"eT(UCAL OR.
Nt,AACE -P MA;.'NE,
To 3�
Y419POW
MUC1.6-Huk*
W(HPOW5
1�
Spanish Ecclectic
After the 1915 Panama- California Exposition there was a renewed interest in Spanish Colonial
architecture, and California especially began to embrace and reinterpret its Spanish and Mexican
past. There are many examples of the Spanish Ecclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival style in
houses, commercial and public buildings throughout California where Spanish and Mexican
cultural influences were strongest. The Spanish Ecclectic style incorporated many details from
different periods of Spanish architecture, and was popular in San Luis Obispo in the 1920s and
1930s.
Characteristic features include:
- barrel or flat tile roofs
- parapets (trowled plaster or stucco)
-flat or low -pitch roofs
- arched doors and windows
-tile chimney cap, vents and drains
- ornamental wood and metal accents
ME+'AL
ANO WINDOWS ;_
TILE(aA'0
VENTS AMP
C�
P L Of- FLAT
PILE �27Py'
OtC WMl-
C(TG} RCbP'
ap - -ffAND l
EXTBFI
CLhHn
tiMl Ott
Examples of this style include:
The M.F. Avila House, 1443 Osos Street
The Righetti Apartments, 1305 Palm Street.
-26-
Craftsman
By the end of the first World War and continuing through the mid- 1940s, a distinctive
architectural style evolved in California. Strongly influenced by the Greene brothers, a design
firm based in California, Craftsman houses featured less ornate detailing than the Victorian style
but still relied on extensive use of wood for structural and exterior elements. This style is
sometimes referred to as "Craftsman Bungalow."
Characteristic features include:
- raised concrete or wood porch with tapered columns
- clapboard siding or plaster exterior finish
- medium to low pitch gable or hip roofs with side eave overhangs and dormers
-wide roof fascia boards
-open eaves with exposed rafters, often with custom work on rafter ends
-post and pier foundations
- double hung wood windows with divided lights
'"err enve 'V PiSf�
EXPOBaO (�A
.N1_S - —,
MOVV*Afr, V W�Q
ri Tem We IYI'M
6ENERO�Yi O(�t1�PYa5
U6 MAX
AR 2A
"OEBP CGMC -F-M OR
Wox, FoFni Lum rhew
OR TAPOM1e_D caumc,—
Examples of this style include:
The Payne House, 1144 Palm Street
1068 Pismo Street
1034 Church Street.
-27-
1_1/. empr MA55 WITH
E*Oue. OR 8Ftev
DORM$,-,
EAVC a ENDS
Mt OE. NN f-
n"Or -E0
PACOW Wi1}t pmp6v
'.Iaff:5(a4I ) IN
urMy- _IA61k
^` �- rc6r MC) flat-
wvsen
gXRGma+
Classical or Main Street
"Classical" or Main Street style of architecture covers a wide_ range of architectural periods. As
with other architectural styles, this style represents a range of architectural influences, including
Gothic, Classical Revival, Italianate, and Romanesque styles, re- interpreted to apply to American
downtowns and commercial areas. Many of the City's larger commercial structures in the
Downtown Historic District fall under this category.
Characteristic features include:
- extensive use of brick and rustic stonework
- highly symmetrical window and door
openings
-use of towers, columns, pediments and
ornate cornices or friezes
-flat roof with parapets
-use of porch, balconies and/or peristyle.
wa oe 7oweFr, ORNhTE
comce" OR P 9S E?.E5 —
57 NM�ICA'V�cBfJ
U5E OP V(mawl5
f V9r_ fiET{ µ54(E5
Examples of this style include:
The Sinsheimer Building, 849 Monterey Street
The Andrews Building, 998 Monterey Street
The Johnson Building 796 Higuera Street.
-28-
- cast or wrought iron storefront structures
- large glass areas (wide bays)
- Neo- classic prominent cornices
- high and open ground floor for retail sales
- masonry side walls
- flat roofs with parapets
C,
Tudor Revival
The Tudor Revival style is one of a series of revivals that gained popularity in the 1920s and
1930s in San Luis Obispo. This revival style is a reinterpretation of late Medieval English
houses. Many of the houses in the Mt. Pleasanton- Anholm area fall into this style. Detail
characteristics include:
Characteristic features include:
- steeply gable and hipped roofs
- varied eave line height
- decorative half - timbering
- plaster or brick exterior siding
- wooden shingles, occasionally imitating thatch
PrL�r(L -y GiaLeD
OR wreD ROor
DECmRA�1vE-
HALF-11ME£R(NG
MTk ftlh6MR
ry,Ai7sR
6MIZIM
Cirr- ✓7DNF- 7rfA&/
AcGeNT AfOUCY
wars # FIlNG�
BAvE L(Nr-
liebsttfh
_LMEIR950 ROoP
4fu0 OVER
G^i'rP.Y
rWCFFVj tasD
LbU$(,r HUNG --
UhNDowS
: 9VZ055ED
'AY
X''(*
Examples of this style include:
The J.J. Dunne House at 59 Benton Way
The Vard Shepherd House at 148 Broad Street
-29-
Modernistic
The Modernistic style refers to both Art Deco and Art Moderne, sometimes called Streamline
Moderne. The Modernistic style, popular in the 1930s, was more commonly applied to
commercial or public buildings, although it occasionally was used in residential architecture.
Relatively few Modernistic structures exist in San Luis Obispo.
Characteristic features include
- smooth stucco wall cladding
- asymmetrical
-flat roof
- geometric stylized motifs in Art Deco; coping at roof line in Art Moderne
c.. A er 'AY a ...- n - .. ....
Examples of this style include:
The Doton Building, 777 Higuera Street,
The Fremont Theater, 1035 Monterey Street.
-30-
r_
5.1.2 Architectural Style Sketchbook (from Rehab Right, City of Oakland)
Queen Anne
Examples:
-690 Islay
-1504 Broad
-793 Buchon
Single -Story Italianate
Examples:
-31-
Queen Anne
Cottage
Examples:
Eastern Shingle Cottage
Classic Box
Examples:
�I AQCTr env
Examples:
Examples:
-32-
Neo- Classic Rowhouse
5.2 Historic District Descriptions
Figure 7: Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo
city of san Luis owspo
histowc Oistizicts
A Street
OW Town
Ix
Rail=
ge-
IT�i 0 0125 025 0.5
-33-
5.2.1 Old Town Historic District
Setting
Established in 1987, the Old Town Historic District abuts the Railroad district on the southeast
and is generally bounded by Pacific and Islay streets on the north and south, and by Santa Rosa
and Beach streets on the east and west. As one of the City's oldest residential neighborhoods,
Old Town was built up historically around the turn of the twentieth century, with older structures
dating back to the 1880s. It consists of five subdivisions: the Mission Vineyard Tract recorded
in March 1873, the Dallidet Tract recorded in 1876, the Murray Church Tract recorded in 1876,
the Ingleside Homestead Tract, recorded in 1887, and the La Vina Homestead Tract, recorded in
1903. The District encompasses 86.1 acres, or 0.13 square miles.
The District's prominent location, located just south of and uphill from the Downtown
commercial district, made it a desirable neighborhood for the City's emerging merchant class
and leading citizens. Here, residents were close to businesses and commerce, but could avoid the
flooding and mud that plagued the Downtown. Home sites were laid out in regular grid
patterns, with relatively wide (60 foot right -of -way) streets and 60 foot wide lots. The resultant
wide streets and lot frontages allowed deep (20+ feet) setbacks and ample landscaping,
reinforcing the district's prosperous image. Today the high concentration of 100 year old or
older residences establishes the District's predominant architectural and visual character.
Site Features and Characteristics
1060 Pismo Street, South Elevation
-34-
Common site features and characteristics
include:
A. Prominent street yard setbacks of 20
feet or more
B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear
yard
C. Finish floors raised 2 3 above finish
grade
D. Front entries oriented toward street,
with prominent walk, stairs and porch
E. Front building facades oriented
parallel to street
Architectural Character
In keeping with its peak period of development between 1880 and 1920, the Old Town District
has many examples of High Victorian architecture, a style popular in California during that time
period that reflected prosperity, power and discriminating taste. This included several style
variations, such as Queen Anne, Italianate, Stick and Gothic Revival influences, especially along
the top of the hill within the district roughly aligned with Buchon Street. Other, more modest
structures with simpler styles abound in other areas of the district. These buildings were first
home to the burgeoning merchant class in San Luis Obispo that emerged during the turn of the
century. These styles include Neo- classic Row House, Folk Victorian, and Craftsman Bungalow,
with many homes borrowing architectural details from several styles. Most of the houses in this
district were designed and constructed by the homes' first occupants or by local builders and
were influenced by architectural pattern books of the time period. The shared first story porches
along Pismo Street are a good example of a common design feature linking buildings.
Predominant architectural features include:
A. Two- and rarely three -story houses
B. Mostly gable and hip roof types
C. Highly ornamented roof features,
including prominent fascias,
bargeboards, gable end treatments,
decorative shingles, prominent
pediments or cornices
D. Traditional fenestration, such as
double -hung, wood sash windows,
divided light windows, ornamental
front doors, wood screen doors
E. Painted wood surface material,
including siding and decorative
moldings
A �r `lgJ_ M�•... �M.
1543 Morro Street, East Elevation
Although many of the buildings were built at separate times, the pattern, rhythm and repetition of
common design elements or detailing of historic building facades along Old Town streets creates
a prevailing theme and character for the
district.
M.F. Avila House, 1443 Osos Street, East
Elevation
Individually Contributing Elements in the
Old Town District
Some buildings within the bounds of the Old
Town District, constructed outside of the
period of significance for the district, 1880-
1920, do not share the elements outlined in the
above description, but have achieved
historical significance on their own and
C
therefore individually contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo.
The M.F. Avila House at 1443 Osos Street is an example of a Spanish Revival style building
built in the late 1920s that has been placed on the City's Master List as a significant resource, in
this case for its craftsmanship as well as its association with a historically significant local
person. St. Stephens Episcopal Church at 1344 Nipomo Street built in 1873 is an example of
Carpenter Gothic style. The first Episcopal church in San Luis Obispo County, St. Stephens is
historically significant both its architecture and its association with the pioneer period of San
Luis Obispo.
Non - Contributing Elements in the Old Town District
Non - contributing buildings are those buildings that both do not meet the criteria outlined above
and have not achieved historical significance. Most of the contemporary buildings in the district
fall into this category.
Non - contributing architectural styles,
materials or site features include:
A. Contemporary stucco or other material
exterior siding
B. Flat or extremely low pitched roof
C. Aluminum sliding windows
D. Rectilinear, "boxy" shape or very
horizontal massing
E. Unarticulated wall surfaces
-36-
The Vista Grande Apartments, 1415 Morro
Street, East Elevation.
-� � �R�
.� r,
��� ,� a •4'%1
�. .
-�
.:
��It' .mot �i�� �:.s � ��.. s% s ,,
l
� � _L� -vc
- i , � G„ '
�,::; �
�-
5.2.2 Downtown Historic District
Setting
The Downtown Historic District encompasses the oldest part of the City of San Luis Obispo and
contains one of the City's highest concentrations of historic sites and structures. The historic
Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa is at the geographic and historic center of the district, which
is bounded roughly by Palm and Marsh Streets on the north and south, Osos and Nipomo Streets
on the east and west, plus Dana Street as the northwest corner. Although some structures date to
the Spanish and Mexican eras (1772 -1850) and the American pioneer settlement era (1850x-
1870), the majority of surviving structures date from the 1870s to the 1920s. The district is
comprised of two subdivisions: the Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded 1878 and the Mission
Vineyard Tract recorded in March of 1873. The Downtown Historic District has an area of 61.5
acres and in 2010 includes 98 designated historic structures.
The Downtown Historic District was developed along the City's earliest commercial corridors
along Monterey, Higuera, Chorro, Garden and Marsh Streets, and has retained its historical use
as San Luis Obispo's commercial and civic center. Commercial structures were laid out in a
regular grid pattern, with buildings set at the back of sidewalks and relatively narrow (60 foot
right -of -way) streets. The resultant narrow streets and zero building setbacks reinforce the
district's human scale and vibrant Main Street image.
Site Features and Characteristics
Common site features and characteristics
include:
A. Buildings located at back of sidewalk
with zero street and side setbacks
B. Finish floors at grade
C. Recessed front entries oriented toward
the street
D. Front _facades oriented toward the
street
E. Trees placed at regular intervals along
the street
721, 717 and 715 Higuera Street, North
Architectural Character Elevation
Built during the San Luis Obispo's boom time circa 1870s -1910s (when the Town's population
increased over 800 percent from 600 people in 1868 to 5,157 in 1910), the district's commercial
architectural styles reflect the increasing wealth of the times. Architectural styles present in the
Downtown District include examples of Classical Revival, Italianate and Romanesque structures,
and more modest early American commercial. Although a few structures were designed by
outside architects (specifically from San Francisco and Los Angeles), the majority of Downtown
buildings were designed and built by local builders, including the Maino family, John Chapek,
and Frank Mitchell.
Smith Building and Union
Hardware Building, 1119 and
1129 Garden Street, East
Elevation
Predominant architectural features include:
A. One to two stories (occasionally three)
B. Flat or low pitched roof, often with a parapet
C. Wide entablature or projecting cornice that often
includes classical architectural details such as
dentils, brackets and molding
D. First floor windows are horizontally oriented
storefront windows, often with display space
facing street. In multi -story structures, windows
are vertically oriented, typically with double
hung, wood sashes, and symmetrically arranged
so that they are dimensionally taller than their
width
E. Structures follow simple rectilinear or "boxy"
buildings forms
F. Masonry or smooth stucco wall siding
G. Contrasting bulkheads along base of street fagade
H. Use of awnings, historic signs, second -story
overhangs and canopies
I. Use of transom windows above storefronts
Individually Contributing Elements in the Downtown District
Not all historic resources in the Downtown Historic
District were built during the district's period of
significance of 1870 -1930. These buildings generally do
not exhibit the signature architectural elements described
above but do contribute to the historic character of San
Luis Obispo in their own right based on age, architectural
style or historical association. By virtue of their
significance, these resources also merit preservation.
For example, the Doton Building is an example of
Streamline Moderne architecture from the 1930s. This
building was placed on the Master List as a significant
resource due to its craftsmanship and the rarity of this
particular style in San Luis Obispo. Additional examples
include the Laird building at 1023 Garden. Built in the
1880s, the Laird building is one of the City's last
remaining Pioneer False front buildings. The Golden State
Creamery building at 570 Higuera is historically
-39-
Street, North Elevation
significant to San Luis Obispo for its association with the dairy industry, an industry integral to
the City's development.
Non - Contributing Elements in Downtown
Non - contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have
not achieved historical significance. Most of the post -1950 contemporary buildings in the
district fall into this latter category.
1010 Nipomo Street, South and West
Elevations
Residential
Non - contributing architectural styles,
materials or site features include:
A. Buildings setback from street or side
property lines
B. Building height, form or massing
which contrasts markedly with the
prevailing 2 -3 story pattern
C. Wood, metal or other contemporary
material siding, or "faux"
architectural materials or features.
D. Asymmetrical arrangement of doors
and windows
E. Raised, non - recessed or offset street
entries to buildings
Although the majority of the Downtown District is commercial, within the district is a smaller
residential section, primarily along Dana Street and also down Monterey Street to the west of the
mission. This subsection includes a spectrum of settlement from the mid 19`h century to the
1920s. Lots were generally platted in regular grids, although curved along Dana to accommodate
the creek.
Site features and characteristics- Residential:
A. Street yard setbacks of 20 feet or
more, often with low walls (2 feet) and
fences at sidewalk
B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear
yard
C. Front entries oriented toward the street
with prominent porch and steps
D. Front facades oriented toward the
street
.l
756 Palm Street, South Elevation
The architectural styles in the residential area of the Downtown district are varied and represent
several different periods of development in San Luis Obispo. The oldest, vernacular Adobe,
dates back the early pioneer period. The Rosa Butr6n de Canet adobe at 466 Dana is from this
period and is one of the few surviving adobes in San Luis Obispo. Folk and High Victorian
structures built during the population influx at turn of the twentieth century. Finally, Spanish
Revival, a style that achieved popularity in San Luis Obispo during the housing boom of 1920s
and 1930s which was itself funded in part by the maturation of war bonds from World War I.
Architectural features- Residential:
- Wtl!TJ1 -tan � .'a •�, :.:,f � _
.l
MM
469 Dana Street, North Elevation
-41-
A. One and rarely two story buildings
B. Gable and hip roof types predominate
C. Traditional fenestration, such as
double -hung, wood sash windows,
ornamental front doors, wood screen
doors
D. Painted wood or smooth stucco
siding.
w/6 ♦ rIK �h , �{
r
J rr _ tir
1
IL
f �
I
w I L e
5.23 Chinatown
Setting
The Chinatown Historic District was established in 1995 to recognize the important contributions
of the Chinese community to the City's history and development. As originally developed,
Chinatown is an enclave within the Downtown Historic District, and extends one block along
both sides of Palm Street between Chorro and Morro Streets. Chinese immigrants arrived in San
Luis Obispo in the 1870s and were instrumental in the construction of many transportation
projects, including the Pacific Coastal Railroad (1874), the Paso - Cambria Road (now Highway
46) (1876), and sections of the Southern Pacific Railroad.(1886- 1894), as well as providing other
goods and services for the community. The Chinatown Historic District comprises a small part of
the City's original subdivision, the Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded in 1878. It is a very
small historic district with an area of 4.4 acres and has 11 designated resources including one
listed on the National Register of Historic Places (Ali Louis Store).
The 800 block of Palm Street was the residential, cultural and commercial center for San Luis
Obispo's Chinese citizens, beginning in the late 19`h century and lasting for around 70 years.
The surviving structures span the district's period of significance, 1884 -1945. Although many of
the original wood structures in Chinatown were demolished in the 1950s to make room for
public parking, the City established a historic district to recognize and preserve the area's
remaining historic features.
Site Features and Characteristics
798 Palm St, South and East Elevations
Architectural Character
Common site features /characteristics include:
A. Buildings located at back of public
sidewalks with zero setbacks
B. Finish floors at grade level.
C. Recessed front entries oriented toward
the street
D. Front facades oriented parallel and
facing the street
E. Trees placed at regular intervals along
the street
Given the limited area of the Chinatown District and the small number of contributing buildings
it contains, it is difficult to isolate features within the district that are unique to and separate from
the adjoining Downtown Historic District. See Downtown Historic Description for general
-43-
v
architectural features. Only four buildings along Palm Street have a historical association with
Chinese -owned businesses and retain unifying architectural details: the Shanghai Low Restaurant
at 861 Palm Street, the Mee Heng Low Restaurant at 815 Palm Street, Ah Louis Store at 800 and
Chongs Candy Store at 798 Palm Street.
Architectural details specific to Chinatown:
A. Historic signs with Chinese imagery or
characters
B. Second story overhang
C. Balconies with wood or metal railings
D. Use of brick, tile or stucco and bright
exterior colors.
E. Prominent use of neon for the
buildings and signs constructed in the
1940s.
F. Rectilinear building forms,
predominately with parapet roofs and
vertically oriented windows on ground
and upper floors.
G. Use of roof and projecting signs using
Chinese style graphics.
D
= L
861 Palm, North Elevation
Individually Contributing Elements in the Chinatown District
O p aG <
v C57 �.
– — - .
Not all historic resources in the Chinatown
Historic District were built during the
District's period of significance. These
buildings were constructed outside of the
period of significance of 1890 -1940,
generally do not exhibit the signature
architectural elements described above, but
do contribute to the historic character of San
Luis Obispo in their own right based on age,
architectural style or historical association.
By virtue of their significance, these
resources also merit preservation.
Sauer /Adams Adobe, 964 Chorro Street, An example is the Sauer /Adams Adobe at
West Elevation 964 Chorro, a rare two -story wood - covered
adobe building. Research indicates the
structure was originally constructed in 1800 as a Mission outbuilding. The second story was
added in 1860 by the Sauer family. The Sauer -Adams Adobe is significant for its association
with the Mexican era development of San Luis Obispo as well as for the rarity of its two- story,
"Monterey Style" design, one of the few remaining of this type in San Luis Obispo County.
..
Non - Contributing Elements in Chinatown
Non - contributing structures are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have
not achieved historical significance. Due to its small size and the 1950s demolition of much of
the original Chinatown structures, the remaining historic character of Chinatown is especially
vulnerable to loss through demolition or incompatible alteration or development.
Non - Contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include:
A. Buildings set back from street or side
property lines
B. Building height, form or massing
which greatly contrasts with the
prevailing one and two story P attern
C. Raised, non- recessed or offset
entrances to buildings
D. Prominent use of metal, glass,
concrete block masonry or other
exterior siding materials which
visually contrast with the District's'
signature architectural elements.
E. Use of architectural forms or details _
that contrast sharply with or visually 8) 7 Palm, South -East Elevatic
detract from the District's signature
architectural elements.
-45-
..7l
m
C• O
1
fF It.
la
° D• 4D r
b r..
817, 815 and 811 Palm Street; close up historic Chop Suey sign at 861 Palm Street; Ah Louis
Store 800 Palm Street; close up of tile and Chinese characters at 815 Palm Street
o 1 'W t.13 ''•:
h Y 1•� +�v".P 71T, y
o
0
Y
° D• 4D r
b r..
817, 815 and 811 Palm Street; close up historic Chop Suey sign at 861 Palm Street; Ah Louis
Store 800 Palm Street; close up of tile and Chinese characters at 815 Palm Street
� o
5.2.4 Mill Street Historic District
Setting
Established in 1987, the Mill Street Historic District is a residential neighborhood bounded by
Pepper and Toro Streets on the east and west, and Peach and Palm Streets on the north and south.
The Mill Street District is part of one subdivision, The Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded in
1878, although the area informally has been referred to as Fremont Heights. For its Land area,
Mill Street Historic District has the highest concentration of historic structures of the City's five
Historic districts. It is a relatively small district, with an area of 20 acres or 0.03125 square
miles, and as of January of 2010 had 84 listed historic properties.
The Mill Street district was developed at the turn of the 20`h century, with the majority of the
existing buildings dating from the 1900s to 1920s, the district's primary period of historical and
architectural significance. The district was developed on high ground with originally very wide
(100 ft) lots in response to both the seasonal flooding and fires that plagued early development in
San Luis Obispo. A few of these wide lots remain in the 1300 block of both Mill Street and Palm
Street, but the majority of them were later re- subdivided into 50 -60 foot wide lots.
Site Features and Characteristics
Common site features and characteristics include:
A. Trees spaced at regular intervals along
the street (especially on Mill Street)
B. Distinctive Camphor Trees lining both
sides of Mill Street between Johnson and
Pepper, a key entry corridor for the
district
C. Consistent street yard setbacks of 20 feet
or more
D. Coach barns (garages) recessed into rear
yard
E. Finish floors raised 2 -3 above finish
grade
F. Front entries oriented toward street, with
prominent walk, stairs and entry porches.
G. Front building facades oriented parallel
to street
Architectural Character
1344 Mill Street, South Elevation
Developed during a population boom in San Luis Obispo circa 1900s- 1920s, the district's
residential architectural styles reflect the prosperity of its residents. While older and more
elaborate residences are located on the 1300 block of both Palm and Mill Streets, the majority of
historic homes were more modest residences. The close proximity to the court house meant that
-47-
n
Mill Street was home to many county employees, including county assessors, attorneys, and
county clerks. The Mill Street District encompasses many different architectural styles, including
revival styles popular at the turn of the twentieth century. These styles include Neo- classic Row
House, Victorian (with elements of Gothic Revival, Queen Anne, Stick and Eastern Shingle),
Tudor Revival, Mission Revival, and Craftsman Bungalow, with many homes borrowing
architectural details from more than one style. Most buildings in this district were built by local
builders, including E.D. Bray and James Maino and were influenced by architectural pattern
books of the time period.
1264 and 1270 Palm Street, South Elevation
Predominant architectural features include:
A. One- and occasionally two -story
houses
B. Mostly gable and hip roof types
C. Traditional fenestration, such as
double -hung, wood sash windows,
ornamental front doors, wood screen
doors
D. Ornamental roof features, including
prominent fascias, bargeboards,
prominent pediments or cornices
E. Painted wood or stucco surface
material, including siding and molding
Individually Contributing Elements in the Mill Street District
Not all historic resources in the Mill Street
Historic District were built during the
district's period of significance. Those
buildings date from the late 1800s, generally
do not exhibit the signature architectural
elements described above, but do contribute
to the historic character of San Luis Obispo
in their own right based on age, architectural
style or historical association. By virtue of
their significance, these resources also merit
preservation.
For example, the Buckley House at 777
Johnson Avenue is a converted carriage 777 Johnson Avenue, East Elevation
house built in the 1880s and is significant for
its design, specifically the board and batten siding, of which there very few examples are left in
the City. The Shipsey House at 1266 Mill Street, a National Register property, is an example of
Eastern Stick and significant for both its architectural style and its association with William
Shipsey, attorney and mayor of San Luis Obispo from 1898 to1901.
.;
Non - Contributing Elements in the Mill Street District
Non - contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have
not achieved historical significance. Most of the post -1950 contemporary buildings in the
district fall into this latter category.
Non - contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include:
1143 Mill Street, North Elevation
A. Aluminum sliding windows
B. Rectilinear, "boxy" shape
C. Metal or other contemporary material
siding, or "faux" architectural
materials or features.
D. Unarticulated wall surfaces
E. Non - recessed or offset street entries to
buildings
yy 9�0 D 63
tP �
1, O
q
C7
ti-
y�qp
6
� 1
1262 Mill Street; 1261 Mill Street; 1143, 1137 and 1127 Peach Street;
Righetti House, 1314 Palm Street
-50-
5.2.5 Railroad Historic District
Setting
Established in 1998, the Railroad Historic District boundaries follow the historic boundaries of
the Southern Pacific rail yard. The district is bounded by railroad right -of -way on the east, from
Johnson Avenue on the north to Orcutt Road on the south, on the northwest generally by Leff
Street, and on the west by Broad Street and the railroad right -of -way. The district includes a
residential and commercial area on the west side of the tracks, and abuts the Old Town Historic
District along its northwest and north boundary. The Southern Pacific (or "Espee ") standard
gauge railroad arrived in San Luis Obispo on May 4`h, 1894. By 1901, San Luis Obispo was a
part of the completed railroad line from San Francisco to Los Angeles, and served as the main
layover and maintenance yard for the coastal route. The SP railroad operated in tandem with the
older, narrow gauge railroad, the Pacific Coast Railway, or PCR. The PCR was a regional
railway with a station on South and Higuera - the development of a spur line along South
connected the PCR with the Southern Pacific rail yard. The Railroad District is a part of nine
older subdivisions: the Beebee Phillips Tract recorded in 1874, Fairview Addition recorded in
1887, Haskins Tract recorded in 1887, Ingleside Homestead Tract recorded in 1887, the McBride
Tract recorded in 1887, the Loomis Addition recorded in 1887, Maymont Addition recorded in
1888, Loomis and Osgood Re- subdivision recorded in 1894 and the Imperial Addition recorded
in 1897. The Railroad District has an area of 80.7 acres or 0.126 square miles and 38 designated
historic structures.
Development in the Railroad Historic District corresponded to the development of the Southern
Pacific Railroad yard. Commercial and residential buildings were constructed to accommodate
railway workers, freight and passengers, and employees of Southern Pacific and related
businesses. Surviving historic structures date from 1894 to 1945, corresponding with the peak
activity of the rail yard and the district's period of significance, and most were constructed from
1894 to 1920. The buildings were laid out in a fairly regular grid near the station,
accommodating the curve of the rail line and the diagonal path of Santa Barbara. South of
Upham the lots are much larger to accommodate the railroad structures.
Site Features and Characteristics
Common site features /characteristics
include:
A. Commercial buildings located at
back of sidewalk with zero street
setbacks
B. Front building facades oriented
parallel to street
C. Finish floors at grade
D. Recessed front entries oriented
toward the street
Channel Commercial Company, 1880
Santa Barbara Avenue, West Elevation
-51-
Architectural Character
The predominant architectural style within the Railroad Historic District is Railroad Vernacular.
Railroad Vernacular is characterized by simplicity of form and detailing, with wood, brick or
plaster siding, and is a style favored by railroad construction for its easy construction. As a
practical vernacular style it also incorporates other elements of other architectural styles
including Classical Revival and Mission Revival. Although many of the buildings within the
district were not constructed by the railroad, their use of Railroad Vernacular styles design
reflects the unifying focus of the district. The buildings in the Railroad District are a mix of
simple, yet elegant houses and practical, industrial- oriented commercial buildings, which create a
distinctive neighborhood. The architectural character and important historical elements are
described in the Railroad District Plan. The Plan includes design guidelines that illustrate
architecturally compatible design treatments for new development.
1901 Santa Barbara, East Elevation
Predominant architectural details include:
-52-
A. One- and two -story buildings
predominate
B. Gable and some hip roof types of low to
medium pitch, occasionally with
parapets
C. Predominantly painted wood siding,
with some masonry or smooth plaster
wall siding
D. Traditional fenestration, such as double -
hung, wood sash windows, and fixed
divided light windows
E. Rectilinear massing, with equal or lesser
volume on second floor
F. Simple detailing often along the roof
line including brackets
Tribune Republic Building, east elevation
1263 Santa Barbara Avenue
Individually Contributing Elements in the Railroad District
0
Not all designated historic resources in the Railroad Historic District were built during the
District's period of significance, 1894 -1945. These buildings were constructed outside of the
period of significance, generally do not exhibit the signature architectural elements described
above, but do contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo in their own right based on
age, architectural style or historical association. By virtue of their significance, these resources
also merit preservation.
For example, the Tribune Republic Building, built in 1873, is believed to be the earliest
surviving wood commercial building in San Luis Obispo and has been placed on the City's
Master List and the National Register of Historic Places for its association with the City's first
newspaper.
Non - Contributing Elements in the Railroad District
Non - contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have
not achieved historical significance. Most of the post -1950 contemporary buildings in the
district fall into this latter category.
Modern addition to 1880 Santa Barbara,
West Elevation
Non- contributing architectural styles,
materials or site features include:
A. Building height, form, scale or
massing which contrasts markedly
with the district's prevailing I and 2-
story buildings
B. Metal, contemporary stucco or other
contemporary siding, including "faux"
architectural details or features that
contrast markedly with traditional
railroad vernacular forms, details and
materials
C. Asymmetrical arrangement of doors or
windows
D. Non - recessed or offset street entries to buildings
Residential
Although the majority of the Railroad District is commercial, there is a small residential area
within it which runs along Church Street and Santa Barbara Avenue from Osos to Upham
Streets. This area was home to many railroad employees and their families.
-53-
n
Site features and characteristics- Residential:
A. Residential buildings with modest street
setbacks of 10 feet
B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear
yard
C. Front building facades oriented parallel
to street.
D. Finish floors raised 2 -3 above finish
grade
E. Front entries oriented toward street,
with prominent walk, stairs and porch
n
The houses within the residential district are
modest, which reflects their early working class 1034 Church St, South Elevation
occupants. Within the district are two hotels,
the Call/Parkview Hotel at 1703 Santa Barbara and the Park/Reidy Hotel at 1815 Osos which
once served as boarding houses for railroad workers. These vernacular buildings have decorative
elements from several styles including Craftsman Bungalow, Classical Revival and Folk
Victorian.
1724 Osos, East Elevation
-54-
Architectural features- Residential:
A. One and two story buildings
B. Gable and some hip roof types of low
to medium pitch
C. Painted wood surface material,
occasionally smooth stucco wall
siding
D. Traditional fenestration, such as
double -hung, wood sash windows,
ornamental front doors, wood screen
doors
■
I
Southern Pacific Railroad Depot, 1011 Railroad Avenue; ParklReidy Hotel 1815
Osos Street; Southern Pacific Railroad Warehouse, 1940 Santa Barbara Avenue; and
house located at 1789 Santa Barbara Avenue.
-55-
113
5.3 Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, Updated March 24, 2010
Address
District or Neighborhood
Date listed
1428 Beach
Old Town
02/03/87
1520 Beach
Old Town
02/03/87
48 Benton
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
1342 Breck
East Railroad Area
02/20/07
156 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
207 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
236 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
282 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
301 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
368 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
381 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
397 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
453 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
456 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
457 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
464 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
472 Broad
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
08/18/98
967 Broad
Downtown
08/16/83
975 Broad
Downtown
08/16/83
1019 -23 Broad
Downtown
08/16/83
1405 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1408 -10 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1418 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1421 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1427 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1505 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1511 -13 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83,
1519 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1531 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1536 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
1544 Broad
Old Town
08/16/83
530 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
533 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
540 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
549 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
575 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
578 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
586 -88 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
594 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
641 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
651 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
-56-
-57-
C,;
654 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
658 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
661 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
665 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
670 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
673 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
676 -80 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
677 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
685 Buchon
Old Town
08/16/83
722 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
770 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
871 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
880 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
885 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
889 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
966 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
973 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
977 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1015 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1035 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1045 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1051 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1057 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1067 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1110 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1118 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1124 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1126 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1132 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1135 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1137 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1144 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1145 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1151 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1152 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1157 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1160 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1165 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1170 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1175 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1176 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1182 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1189 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
1190 Buchon
Old Town
02/03/87
742 Center
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
755 Center
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
-57-
30 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
45 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
59 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
63 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
69 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
115 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
128 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
158 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
173 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
183 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
190 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
211 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
360 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
01/05/99
368 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
369 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
395 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
398 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
431 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
453 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
476 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
482 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
487 Chorro
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
940 -42 Chorro
Downtown
08/16/83
950 Chorro
Chinatown
02/03/87
970 Chorro
Downtown
08/16/83
978 -80 Chorro
Downtown
08/16/83
984 Chorro
Downtown
08/16/83
1023 Chorro
Downtown
02/03/87
1111 Chorro
Downtown
02/03/87
1119 Chorro
Downtown
02/03/87
1534 Chorro
Old Town
02/03/87
1603 Chorro
Old Town
02/03/87
882 Church
Old Town
02/03/87
888 Church
Old Town
02/03/87
893 Church
Old Town
02/03/87
971 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
972 Church
Old Town
02/03/87
1010 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
1018 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
1022 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
1028 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
1034 Church
Railroad
02/03/87
465 Dana .,
Downtown
02/03/87
469 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
507/515 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
522 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
525 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
531 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
543 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
547 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
577 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
579 Dana
Downtown
02/03/87
1013 Ella
East Railroad
02/20/07
1015 Ella
East Railroad
02/20/07
1240 Ella
East Railroad
02/20/07
1255 Ella
East Railroad
02/20/07
1265 Ella
East Railroad
02/20/07
1345 Ella #17
East Railroad
02/20/07
1672 Fairview
East Railroad
02/20/07
1110 Garden
Downtown
02/03/87
1408 Garden
Old Town
02/03/87
1421 Garden
Old Town
02/03/87
1425 Garden
Old Town
02/03/87
1536 Garden
Old Town
02/03/87
1043 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
1127 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
1205 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
1215 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
1234 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
1236 George
East Railroad
02/20/07
673 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
685 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
686 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
698 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
699 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
705 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
715 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
717 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
718 -20 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
723 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
725 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
728 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
733 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
746 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
751 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
760 -70 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
778 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
779 -87 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
782 -90 Higuera
Downtown
08/16/83
858 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
970 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
995 Higuera
Downtown
02/03/87
-59-
c
c
491 Hill
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
1136 Iris
East Railroad
02/20/07
1139 Iris
East Railroad
02/20/07
1140 Iris
East Railroad
02/20/07
1204 Iris
East Railroad
02/20/07
454 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
462 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
468 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
481 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
482 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
530 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
539 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
542 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
550 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
559 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
567 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
572 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
574 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
575 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
641 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
654 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
655 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
662 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
663 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
675 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
676 Islay
Old Town
08/16/83
727 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
744 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
752 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
753 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
770 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
827 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
862 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
868/870 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
878 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
879 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
893 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
974 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
976 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
978 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
980 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1005 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1011 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1017 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1022 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1029 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1101m
I
1034 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1035 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1040 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1044 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1045 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1053 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1061 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1071 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1117 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1120 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
1121 Islay
Old Town
02/03/87
772 Johnson
Mill
08/16/83
773 Johnson
Mill
08/16/83
879 Johnson
Mill
02/03/87
949 Johnson
Mill
02/03/87
955 Johnson
Mill
02/03/87
957 Johnson
Mill
02/03/87
1408 Johnson
Johnson Avenue
10/07/97
1985 Johnson
East Railroad
02/20/07
2105 Johnson
East Railroad
02/20/07
968 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
976 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1020 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1027 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1028 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1035 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1045 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1051 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
1059 Leff
Old Town
02/03/87
754 Lincoln
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
755 Lincoln
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
762 Lincoln
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
785 Lincoln
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
795 Lincoln
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
412 Marsh
none
01/05/99
742 Marsh
Downtown
02/03/87
778 Marsh
Downtown
02/03/87
704 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
706 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
724 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
732 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
770 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
780 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
794 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
804 Meinecke
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
05/04/99
1162 Mill
Mill
02/03/87
1101m
1165 Mill
Mill
02/03/87
1168 Mill
Mill
02/03/87
1202 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1214 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1217 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1220 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1234 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1237 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1244 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1253 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1261 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1262 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1265 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1307 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1318 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1333 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1343 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1344 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1350 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1351 -63 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1360 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
1367 Mill
Mill
08/16/83
249 Mission Lane
Mt. Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
728 Mission
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
734 Mission
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
752 Mission
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
610 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
614 Monterey
Downtown
02/03/87
658 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
667 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
679 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
840 Monterey
Downtown
02/03/87
857 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
861 -63 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
886 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
894 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
895 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
956 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
974 -82 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
1005 Monterey
Downtown
08/16/83
1009 Monterey
Downtown
02/03/87
879 Morro
Downtown
02/03/87
1009 Morro
Downtown
02/03/87
1336 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1346 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1428 Mono
Old Town
02/03/87
-62-
INIE
C
C�
1436 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1444 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1512 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1520 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1527 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1528 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1535 Mono
Old Town
02/03/87
1536 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1543 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1544 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1604 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1615 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1720 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1727 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1729 Morro,
Old Town
02/03/87
1731 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1814 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1821 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1829 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
1845 Morro
Old Town
02/03/87
501 Mt. View
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
644 Mt. View
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
676 Mt. View
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
764 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
807 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
814 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
815 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
822 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
823 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
829 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
836 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
851 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
854 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
859 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
869 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
871 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
883 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
884 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm (Old Town) 07/09/99
894 Murray
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
1415 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1429 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1438 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1516 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1519 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1527 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1528 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
INIE
� r
1535 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
154.1 Nipomo
Old Town
08/16/83
1341 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1350 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1421 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1511 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1514 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1521 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1522 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1526 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1529 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1533 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1534 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1541 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1542 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1609 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1638 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1641 Osos
Old Town
02/03/87
1724 Osos
Railroad
02/03/87
1734 Osos
Railroad
02/03/87
1740 Osos
Railroad
02/03/87
1750 Osos
Railroad
02/03/87
1814 Osos
Railroad
02/03/87
682 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
752 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
756 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
776 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
778 Palm
Chinatown
02/03/87
798 Palm
Chinatown
08/16/83
811 Palm
Chinatown
02/03/87
815 Palm
Chinatown
02/03/87
861 Palm
Chinatown
02/03/87
1014 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
1020 Palm
Downtown
02/03/87
1201 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1208 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1228 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1236 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1243 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1248 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1250 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1259 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1260 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1264 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1269 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1270 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
-64-
-65-
1317 Palm
Mill'
08/16/83
1320 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1344 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1347 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1355 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1359 Palm
Mill
02/03/87
1390 Palm
Mill
08/16/83
1134 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1137 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1143 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1151 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1154 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1156 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1163 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1168 Peach
Mill
08/16/83
1206 Peach
Mill
02/03/87
1209 Peach
Mill
08/16/83
1215 Peach
Mill
08/16/83
1221 Peach
Mill
08/16/83
861 Pepper
Mill
08/16/83
571 Pismo
Old Town
08/16/83
657 Pismo
Old Town
08/16/83
660 Pismo
Old Town
08/16/83
663 Pismo
Old Town
08/16/83
683 Pismo
Old Town
08/16/83
729 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
954 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
956 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
958 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
969 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
977 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
979 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
985 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1042 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1050 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1060 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1068 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1109 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1126 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1133 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1145 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1147 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1152 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1155 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1160 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1163 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
-65-
ls7OM
1166 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1171 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1176 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1179 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1185 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1190 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
1193 Pismo
Old Town
02/03/87
907 Rachel
East Railroad
02/20/07
2056 Rachel
East Railroad
02/20/07
1020 Railroad
Railroad
02/03/87
747 Rougeot
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
750 Rougeot
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
762 Rougeot
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
783 Rougeot
Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm
07/09/99
1908 Ruth
East Railroad
02/20/07
1749 Santa Barbara
Railroad
02/03/87
1789 Santa Barbara
Railroad
02/03/87
1901 Santa Barbara
Railroad
02/03/87
1414 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1426 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1504 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1512 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1515 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1520 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1521 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1530 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1606 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1617 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1624 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1627 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1633 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1705 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1707 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1720 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1728 Santa Rosa
Old Town
02/03/87
1730 Santa Rosa
Railroad
02/03/87
1731 Santa Rosa
Railroad
02/03/87
2006 Swazey
East Railroad
02/20/07
2033 Swazey
East Railroad
02/20/07
675 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
760 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
762 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
770 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
771 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
778 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
780 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
ls7OM
-67-
0
855 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
858 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
862 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
865 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
872 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
898 Toro
Mill
08/16/83
1423 Toro
Old Town
02/03/87
875 Upham
Railroad
02/03/87
750 Woodbridge
Little Italy
10/02/2001
756 Woodbridge
Little Italy
10/02/2001
762 Woodbrige
Little Italy
10/02/2001
-67-
5.4 Master List of Historic Resources, updated March 24, 2010
*Serial Number:
0000 00
X
Sequential National Register Rating Type of Structure
Type of Structure
Number I = Already placed on National Register
R = Residential
2 = Determined eligible for the National Register
C = Commercial
3 = Eligible for the National Register
O = Other
4 = Potentially eligible for the National Register
5 = Not eligible for the National Register
but locally significant
Address
Historic Name
Zone
District
Serial No.*
1451 ANDREWS
ANDREWS ADOBE
R -1 -S
0001 -03R
59 BENTON WAY
J. J. DUNNE HOUSE
R -1
0165 -05R
148 BROAD
BRAZIL HOUSE
R -1
0002 -04R
963 BROAD
MANDERSCHEID HOUSE
R -3 -H
Downtown
0003 -04R
1345 BROAD
ANDERSON HOUSE
O -H
Old Town
0004 -04R
1411 BROAD
MAIER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0005 -04R
1426 BROAD
DUTTON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0006 -04R
1435 BROAD
MILLER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0007 -04R
1445 BROAD
FALKENSTEIN HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0008 -04R
1504 BROAD
VETTERLINE HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0009 -03R
1510 BROAD
MCKENNON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0010 -04R
1516 BROAD
RENETZKY HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0011 -04R
1530 BROAD
TUCKER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0012 -04R
714 BUCHON
MYRON ANGEL HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0013 -OIR
726 BUCHON
JESSIE WRIGHT MATERNITY HOME
R -2 -H
Old Town
0014 -04R
743 BUCHON
BRADBURY SANITARIUM
R -2 -H
Old Town
0015 -04R
745 BUCHON
BRADBURY HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0016 -04R
751 BUCHON
KAISER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0017 -04R
752 BUCHON
STANTON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0018 -04R
771 BUCHON
BREW HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0019 -04R
779 BUCHON
UPHAM HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0020 -04R
785 BUCHON
MARSHALL HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0021 -04R
793 BUCHON
CROCKER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0022 -03R
794 BUCHON
FITZGERALD HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0023 -03R
850 BUCHON
CLARK/NORTON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0024 -04R
860 BUCHON
HOURIHAN HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0025 -04R
890 BUCHON
PAULSON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0026 -04R
896 BUCHON
CROSSETT HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0027 -04R
116 CHORRO
MICHAEL C. HALPIN HOUSE
R -1
0176 -05R
375 CHORRO
CHRIS ANHOLM HOUSE
R -1
0175 -05R
868 CHORRO
MANCILLA/FREITAS ADOBE
R4
0028 -03R
964 CHORRO
SAUER/ADAMS ADOBE
C -D -H
Chinatown
0029 -03R
1026 CHORRO
WADE BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0100 -05C
1029 CHORRO
DUGHI BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0101 -05C
1033 CHORRO
WICKENDEN BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0102 -05C
1306 CHORRO
REGAN HOUSE
0
0030 -05R
1318 CHORRO
MAZZA HOUSE
0
0031 -04R
1518 CHORRO
BROOKS HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0032 -03R
1546 CHORRO
FLEUGER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0033 -04R
1746 CHORRO
ASTON HOUSE
R -2
0034 -05R
.:
I Inez
Address
Historic Name
Zone
District
Serial No.
1902 CHORRO
BFI -TICK RESIDENCE
R -2
0170 -05R
1907 CHORRO
FINNEY HOUSE
R -2
0035 -05R
1953 CHORRO
OLIVER HOUSE
R -2
0163 -05R
466 DANA
ROSA BUTRON ADOBE
R -3 -H
Downtown
0036 -03R
532 DANA
ANDERSON HOUSE
R -3 -H
Downtown
0037 -04R
550 DANA
BARNEBERG HOUSE
O -H -PD
Downtown
0038 -04R
1500 ETO
SOLOMON FOREMAN HOUSE
R -1 -PD
0166 -05R
1119 GARDEN
UNION HARDWARE BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0103 -04C
1123 GARDEN
SMITH BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0104 -05C
1129 GARDEN
LAIRD BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0105 -05C
1130 GARDEN
STOVER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0106 -05C
1212 GARDEN
GOLDTREE/MCCAFFREY HOUSE
C -D
0039 -04C
1105 GEORGE
EDWARD F. BUSHNELL HOUSE
R -2
0154 -05R
2132 HARRIS
WEILL HOUSE
R -2
0040 -04R
50 HIGUERA
DIV. OF HIGHWAYS DIST. 5 OFF.
PF
0156 -03C
75 HIGUERA
LOOMIS FEED CO. WAREHOUSE
C -S -MU
0107 -05C
236 HIGUERA
H. H. WAITE PLANING MILL
C -S -MU
0108 -05C
570 HIGUERA
GOLDEN STATE CREAMERY
C -D
Downtown
0109 -05C
719 HIGUERA
GREENFIELD BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0110 -05C
726 HIGUERA
KLUVER CIGAR FACTORY
C -D -H
Downtown
0111 -03C
736 HIGUERA
CARRISA BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0112 -04C
740 HIGUERA
VOLLMER GROCERY
C -D -H
Downtown
0113 -05C
767 HIGUERA
BANK OF AMERICA BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0114 -03C
777 HIGUERA
DOTON BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0115 -03C
796 HIGUERA
JOHNSON BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0116 -05C
799 HIGUERA
COMMERCIAL BANK BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0117 -05C
842 HIGUERA
WARDEN/TOWER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0118 -04C
849 HIGUERA
GOLDTREE BLOCK/HOTEL WINEMAN
C -D -H
Downtown
0119 -05C
852 HIGUERA
A. F. FITZGERALD BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0120 -05C
856 HIGUERA
SANDERCOCK TRANSFER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0120 -05C
3897 SO. HIGUERA
LONGBONETTI RANCH
M -SP
0157 -04R
1100 IRIS
SOUTHERN PACIFIC WATER TOWER
C /OS
Railroad
0153 -04C
461 ISLAY
ERICKSON HOUSE
R -2
0041 -04R
463 ISLAY
FUMIGALLI HOUSE
R -2
0042 -05R
497 ISLAY
VOLLMER HOUSE
R -2
0043 -05R
535 ISLAY
SANDERCOCK HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0044 -04R
591 ISLAY
SANDERCOCK HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0045 -05R
644 ISLAY
DANA/PARSONS HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0046 -05R
670 ISLAY
FITZPATRICK HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0047 -04R
687 ISLAY
ERICKSON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0048 -03R
690 ISLAY
KIMBALL HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0049 -04R
790 ISLAY
JACKSON HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0050 -04R
1052 ISLAY
KAUFMAN HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0174 -05R
777 JOHNSON
BUCKLEY HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0051 -05R
1720 JOHNSON
THE JUDGE'S HOUSE
R -2
0052 -03R
2030 JOHNSON
OLD SLO HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOM
R -2
0175 -05R
1019 -23 LEFF
POST HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0053 -04R
1590 LIZZIE
LA LOMA DE LA NOPALERA ADOBE
R -1 -SP
0158 -04C
100 MADONNA
MADONNA INN
C -T, C -T -S
0121 -04C
536 MARSH
JACK HOUSE
C -D
0054 -030
547 MARSH
KAETZEL HOUSE
C -D
0055 -04R
774 MARSH
SNYDER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0122 -04C
I Inez
-70-
Address
Historic Name
Zone
District
Serial No.
859 MARSH
MASONIC TEMPLE
C -D
0123 -03C
893 MARSH
U.S. POST OFFICE
C -D
0124 -05C
951 MARSH
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
C -D
0125 -03C
981 MARSH
FREDERICK HART BUILDING
C -D
0125 -03C
1117 MARSH
ESQUAR HOUSE
0
0056 -04R
1129 MARSH
RAMAGE HOUSE
0
0057 -04R
1135 MARSH
SHIPMAN HOUSE
0
0058 -04R
1141 MARSH
THE NURSE'S HOUSE
O
0059 -04R
1145 MARSH
FAULKNER HOUSE
0
0060 -04R
1160 MARSH
STOVER'S SANITARIUM
0
0126 -03C
1 167 MARSH
GRAVES HOUSE
0
0061 -05R
1305 MARSH
REID HOUSE
0
0062 -05R
1266 MILL
SHIPSEY HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0063 -01 R
1306 MILL
SMITH HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0064 -04R
1323 MILL
LAIRD HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0172 -05R
1330 MILL
MUSCIO HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0065 -05R
1333 MILL
BURCH HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0173 -05R
1424 MILL
MAINO HOUSE
R -2
0066 -05R
1460 MILL
MUGLER HOUSE
R -2
0067 -04R
642 MONTEREY
HAYS /LATTIMER ADOBE
O -H
Downtown
0068 -03R
664 MONTEREY
DR. GEORGE B. NICHOLS HOUSE
O -H
Downtown
0069 -04R
696 MONTEREY
CARNEGIE LIBRARY
PF -H
Downtown
0128 -030
747 MONTEREY
MURRAY ADOBE
PF -H
Downtown
0070 -030
782 MONTEREY
MISSION SAN LUIS OBISPO
C -D -S -H
Downtown
0127 -030
848 MONTEREY
SAUER BAKERY
C -D -H
Downtown
0129 -05C
849 MONTEREY
SINSHEIMER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0130 -03C
868 MONTEREY
MUZIO'S GROCERY
C -D -H
Downtown
0131 -03C
955 MONTEREY
ANDERSON HOTEL
C -D -H
Downtown
0132 -05C
962 MONTEREY
BRUNNER BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0133 -05C
998 MONTEREY
ANDREWS BUILDING
C -D -H
Downtown
0135 -03C
1035 MONTEREY
FREMONT THEATER
C -D -H
Downtown
0136 -03C
1815 MONTEREY
MONDAY CLUB
C -T -S
0137 -03C
2223 MONTEREY
MILESTONE MOTEL INN
C -T -S
0138 -03C
1406 MORRO
SNYDER HOUSE
R -3 -1-1
Old Town
0071 -04R
1511 MORRO
MARTHA DUNLAP HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0167 -05R
1624 MORRO
BULLARD HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0072 -04R
1636 MORRO
BAKER HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0073 -04R
1642 MORRO
ALBERT HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0074 -04R
991 NIPOMO
HARMONY CREAMERY
O -H
Downtown
0139 -05C
1204 NIPOMO
PARSONS HOUSE
C -D
0075 -05R
1344 NIPOMO
ST. STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH
R -2 -1-1
Old Town
0141 -030
1407 NIPOMO
PATTON HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0076 -04R
1428 NIPOMO
ROGERS HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0077 -05R
1446 NIPOMO
NICHOLS HOUSE
R -2 -1-1
Old Town
0078 -05R
978 OLIVE
HERITAGE INN
C -T
0159 -05C
890 0SOS
TEASS HOUSE
O -H
Downtown
0079 -04R
976 0SOS
COUNTY COURTHOUSE
PF -H
Downtown
0142 -040
1301 0SOS
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
0
0143 -030
1429 0SOS
FRANK CAMPBELL MITCHELL HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0171 -05R
1443 0SOS
M. F. AVILA HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0080 -03R
1700 0SOS
ALLEN HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0081 -05R
1716 0SOS
HAGEMAN SANITARIUM
R -3 -H
Old Town
0082 -04R
-70-
La
Address Historic Name
Zone District Serial No.
1815 0SOS
PARK/REIDY HOTEL
C -R -S -H
Railroad
0144 -05C
863 PACIFIC
ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH
0
0145 -04C
1106 PACIFIC
KUNDERT MEDICAL BUILDING
0
0146 -03C
1185 PACIFIC
DALLIDET ADOBE
0
0083 -030
800 PALM
AH LOUIS STORE
C -D -H
Chinatown
0147 -03C
990 PALM
SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY HALL
PF -H
Downtown
0164 -050
1118 PALM
GREGG HOUSE
O
0175 -05R
1144 PALM
PAYNE HOUSE
0
0084 -03R
1305 PALM
RIGHETTI APARTMENTS
R -3 -H
Mill Street
0085 -05R
1314 PALM
RIGHETTI HOUSE
R -3 -H
Mill Street
0086 -05R
71 PALOMAR
SANDFORD HOUSE
R-4
0087 -05R
1127 PEACH
J. MAINO HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0088 -05C
1128 PEACH
MAINO/RIGHETTI HOUSE
R -2 -H
Mill Street
0089 -04R
280 PISMO
OLD GAS WORKS
C -S
0148 -04C
559 PISMO
BIDDLE HOUSE
R -3 -H
Old Town
0090 -03R
649 PISMO
MCMANUS HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0091 -03R
671 PISMO
LEWIN HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0092 -05R
676 PISMO
GREENFIELD HOUSE
O -H
Old Town
0093 -04R
750 PISMO
OLD FIRE STATION BUILDING
O
0140 -03C
1116 PISMO
VOLLMER HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0094 -04R
1123 PISMO
THORNE HOUSE
R -2 -H
Old Town
0095 -05R
1341 PURPLE SAGE
RODRIGUEZ ADOBE
R -1 -PD
0160 -03C
1011 RAILROAD
SOUTHERN PACIFIC DEPOT
C -S -S -H
Railroad
0149 -04C
1021 RAILROAD
SP TRANSPORTATION CO. BLDG.
C -S -S -H
Railroad
0168 -02C
1335 ROUNDHOUSE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC ROUNDHOUSE
C -S -S -H
Railroad
0169 -02C
1499 SAN LUIS DRIVE
SLO HIGH SCHOOL GYMNASIUM
PF
0155 -05C
1703 SANTA BARBARA
CALL HOTEL
R -3 -H
Railroad
0096 -05R
1717 SANTA BARBARA
WILLIAM M. DUFF HOUSE
R -3 -H
Railroad
0161 -05R
1725 SANTA BARBARA
ALEXANDER GALEWSKI HOUSE
R -3 -H
Railroad
0162 -05R
1763 SANTA BARBARA
TRIBUNE- REPUBLIC BUILDING
R -3 -H
Railroad
0152 -04R
1880 SANTA BARBARA
CHANNEL COMMERCIAL COMPANY
C -R -S -H
Railroad
0151 -04C
1940 SANTA BARBARA
SOUTHERN PACIFIC WAREHOUSE
C -S -S -H
Railroad
0150 -04C
2243 SANTA YNEZ
FAULSTICH HOUSE
R -1
0134 -05R
1445 SANTA ROSA
KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL
PF -H
Old Town
0097 -.040
1531 SANTA ROSA
ADRIANCE COURT
R -3 -H
Old Town
0098 -05R
843 UPHAM
CHAPEK HOUSE
R -2
0099 -05R
} }}
-71-
u
5.5 Definitions
101
For the purposes of this chapter, certain terms, words and their derivatives shall be defined as
specified herein;
1. Accessory Structure: a structure which is subordinate or incidental and directly related to a
permitted use or structure on the same parcel. "Accessory structures" that include habitable
space, as defined by the California Building Code, shall be no larger than 450 square feet. (Ord.
941- 1(part), 1982: prior code — 9204.11 (part)) "Accessory structures" are located on the same
parcel and are related to the primary structure but are subordinate or incidental, but may include
structures that have achieved historic significance in their own right, as determined by the
Director, Committee or Council. (see "primary structure ").
2. Adjacent: located on property which abuts the subject property on at least one point of the
property line, on the same property, or located on property directly across right -of -way from
subject property and able to viewed concurrently.
3. Adverse Effects: effects, impacts or actions that are detrimental or potentially detrimental to a
historic resource's condition, architectural or historical integrity.
4 Alteration: change, repair, replacement, remodel, modification, or new construction to: (1) the
exterior of an historic resource or adjacent building, (2) the structural elements which support the
exterior walls, roof, or exterior elements of the historic resource or adjacent building, (3) other
construction on a lot, or (4) character defining features of the interior of a historic resource if the
structure's significance is wholly or partially, based on interior features and the resource is
publicly - accessible. "Alteration" does not include ordinary landscape maintenance unless the
landscaping is identified as significant at the time a property is listed. "Alteration" also does not
include ordinary property maintenance or repair that is exempt from a building permit or is
consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
5. Archaeological Site: those areas where archaeological resources are present and may be larger
or smaller than the project site. An archaeological site may include prehistoric Native American
archaeological site, Historic archaeological sites; sites or natural landscapes associated with
important human events; and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes.
6. ARC: the Architectural Review Commission as appointed by the City Council.
7. California Register: California Register of Historical Resources defined in California PRC
5024.1 and in CCR Title 14 Chap 11.5, Sec 4850 et seq. as it may be amended.
8. CHC: the Cultural Heritage Committee as appointed by the City Council.
9. Character Defining Features: as outlined in the U.S. Department of the Interior's National
Register Bulletin 15 and Preservation Brief 17: "How to Identify Character Defining Features ",
the architectural character and general composition of a resource, including, but not limited to,
type and texture of building material; type, design, and character of all windows, doors, stairs,
-72-
porches, railings, molding "and other _ appurtenant elements; and fenestration, ornamental
detailing, elements of craftsmanship, finishes, etc.
10. City: the City of San Luis Obispo.
11. Community Design Guidelines: the most recent version of the City's Community
Design Guidelines as adopted and amended from time to time.
12. Contributing Resource or Property: Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that
maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by
themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a
neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole. They need not be located in a historic district.
In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old, but are nonetheless
significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described herein may be
designated as a Contributing resource.
13. Council: the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo.
14. Cultural Resource: any prehistoric or historic district, site, landscape, building, structure, or
object included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation,
including artifacts, records, and material remains related to such a property or resource.
15. Demolition: for the purpose of these guidelines, "demolition" refers to any act or failure to
act that destroys, removes, or relocates, in whole or part a historical resource such that its historic
or architectural character and significance are materially altered.
16. Deterioration: the significant worsening of a structure's condition, architectural or historic
integrity, due to lack of maintenance, organisms, neglect, weathering and other natural forces.
17. Director: the Director of the Community Development Department, or another person
authorized by the Director to act on his or her behalf.
18. Feasible: capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period
of time, taking into account cultural, economic, environmental, historic, legal, social and
technological factors. Structural feasibility means that a building or other structure can be
repaired or rehabilitated so as to be safe and usable without significant loss of historic fabric.
Factors to be considered when making this determination include the existence of technology
that will allow the design of the work and the ability to repair, supplement or replace load -
bearing members and the thermal and moisture protection systems required for continued use of
the structure; and the physical capacity of the structure to withstand the repair and /or
rehabilitation process without the danger of further damage.
19. Historic Building Code: the most recent version of the California Historical Building Code,
Title 25, Part, 8, as defined in Sections 18950 to 18961 of Division 12, Part 2.7 of Health and
Safety Code (H &SC), a part of California State law.
-73-
20. Historic Context: Historic context are those patterns, themes or trends in history by which
a specific occurrence, property, or site is understood and its meaning and significance is made
clear.
21. Historic District/Historical Preservation District: areas or neighborhoods with a collection
or concentration of listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologically
significant sites, where historic properties help define the area or neighborhood's unique
architectural, cultural, and historic character or sense of place. Historic districts may be,
delineated on the official zoning map as Historic (H) overlay zone under San Luis Obispo
Municipal Code Chapter 17.54.
22. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: the most recent version of the Historic
Preservation Program Guidelines, as adopted from time to time.
23. Historic Preservation Report. a document which describes preservation, rehabilitation,
restoration, or reconstruction measures for a historic resource, based on the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, and which includes standards and
guidelines for recommended treatments for preserving the resource.
24. Historic Property: a property, including land and buildings, which possesses aesthetic,
architectural, cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially
eligible for local, State or National historic designation.
25. Historic Resource: any building, site, improvement, area or object of aesthetic, architectural,
cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for
local, State or National historic designation.
26. Historic Status: historic designation of a listed resource or property as approved by Council.
27. Improvement: any building, structure, fence, gate, landscaping, hardscaping, wall, work of
art, or other object constituting a physical feature of real property or any part of such feature.
28. Inappropriate Alteration: alterations to historic resources which violate these provisions
and/or the Historic Preservation Ordinance.
29. Integrity, Architectural or Historical: the ability of a property, structure, site, building,
improvement or natural feature to convey its identity and authenticity, including but not limited
to its original location, period(s) of construction, setting, scale, design, materials, detailing,
workmanship, human values, uses and association.
30. Inventory of Historic Resources: the list of historically designated resources and properties
consisting of Master List and Contributing Properties List Historic Resources, and any
properties, objects, sites, gardens, sacred places and resources subsequently added to the
inventory as determined to meet criteria outlined herein and approved by the City Council.
31. Listed Resource: properties and resources included in the Inventory of Historic Resources.
-74-
32. Massing: the spatial relationships, arrangement and organization of a building's physical
bulk or volume.
33. Master List Resource: designation which may be applied to the most unique and important
historic properties and resources in terms of age, architectural or historical significance, rarity, or
association with important persons or events in the City's past, meeting criteria outlined in the
Historic Preservation Ordinance.
34. Minor Alteration. Any structural or exterior change to a historic resource which the
Director determines to be consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines,
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and other applicable
standards.
35. Modern Contributing Resources: designation which may be applied to properties and
resources which are less than 50 years old, but which exemplify or include significant works of
architecture or craftsmanship or are associated with a person or event significant to the City's
history.
36. National Register of Historic Places: the official inventory of districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, engineering, archaeology
and culture which is maintained by the Secretary of the Interior under the authority of the
Historic Sites Act of 1935 and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
37. Neglect: the lack of maintenance, repair or protection from natural elements or vandalism of
a listed property, resource, site or structure, which results in significant deterioration, as
determined by the Director, CHC or City Council based on visual and physical evidence.
38. Non - Contributing Resource: designation which may be applied to properties and resources
in historic districts which are typically less than 50 years old and do not support the prevailing
historic character of the district or other listing criteria as outlined in the Historic Preservation
Ordinance.
39. Preservation: the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain a historic site,
building or other structure's historically significant existing form, integrity, and materials
through stabilization, repair and maintenance.
40. Property Owner: the person or entity (public or private) holding fee title interest or legal
custody and control of a property.
41. Primary Structure: the most important building or other structural feature on a parcel in
terms of size, scale, architectural or historical significance, as determined by the Committee.
42. Qualified Professional: an individual meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional
Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61 Appendix A) in history, architectural history, historic
-75-
C O
architecture and other designated categories, or an individual determined by the CHC to have the
qualifications generally equivalent to the above standards based on demonstrated experience..
43. Reconstruction: the act or process of recreating the features, form and detailing of a non-
surviving building or portion of building, structure, object, landscape, or site for the purpose of
replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location.
44. Rehabilitation: the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property
through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which
convey its architectural, cultural, or historic values.
45. Relocation: removal of a resource from its original site and its re- establishment at another
location in essentially the same form, appearance and architectural detailing.
46. Responsible party: any person, business, company or entity, and the parent or legal guardian
of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, who has done any act for which an
administrative penalty may be imposed.
47. Restoration the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a
property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from
other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period.
48. Scale: the proportions of architectural design that relate to human size or other relative size
measure.
49. Secretary of the Interior's Standards: the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties as published by the U.S. Department of the Interior and as
amended from time to time.
50. Setting: the physical area, environment or neighborhood in which a resource is located.
51. Sensitive Site: a site determined by the Community Development Director, Planning
Commission, Architectural Review Commission or Council, upon recommendation of the
Cultural Heritage Committee, to have special characteristics, constraints or community value
such as: historic significance, historic context, creek side location or visual prominence,
requiring more detailed development review than would otherwise be required for other similarly
zoned lots.
52. Site: as used in these guidelines, the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic
occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where
the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archeological value regardless of the value of
any existing structure.
53. Siting: the placement of structures and improvements on a property or site.
-76-
o
54. Stabilization: the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weather
resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property while
maintaining the essential form as it exists at present.
55. Statement of Historic Significance: A statement of significance is an explanation of why a
resource is important within its historic context. It explains how the resource meets the eligibility
criteria and integrity thresholds as established by local, state or federal government.
56. Structure: as used here, "structure" includes anything assembled or constructed on the
ground, or attached to anything with a foundation on the ground, including walls, fences,
buildings, signs, bridges, monuments, and similar features.
57. Survey: a systematic process for identifying and evaluating a community's resources using
established criteria. "Survey" may also refer to the documentation resulting from a survey
project.
58. Threatened Resource: properties or resources at risk of loss of architectural, cultural or
historic value due to physical alteration, relocation or demolition.
59. Zoning Code: Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code, as amended from time to time.
-77-
it �tl
Aw .-T"�
Ft-
5.6 Works Cited and Information Links
Angel, Myron Ed. History of San Luis Obispo County, of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers.
Fresno: Valley Publishers, 1979. Originally published Oakland: Thompson and West,
1883.
Bowsher, Alice Meriwether. Design Review in Historic Districts. Washington D.C.: Preservation
Press, 1975.
California Office of Historic Preservation. "Technical Assistance Bulletin #14 Drafting Effective
Historic Preservation Ordinances." Sacramento, June 2005.
Carr, Paula Juelke. "Proposal for Chinatown Historic District." July 1995.
Conway, Thor. "Kozak Parking Lot Project, An Archaeological Investigation of Historic SLO,
CA." San Luis Obispo: City of San Luis Obispo, 1995.
Dart, Louisiana Clayton. Vignettes of History in San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo:
Mission Federal Savings, 1978.
Friedman, Donald. Historical Building Construction: Design Material and Technology. New
York: Norton, 1995.
Haggard, Ken. A Brief Architectural History of San Luis Obispo. San Luis Obispo, CA.: Central
Coast Books, 2008.
Hall- Patton, Mark P. Memories of the Land: Placenaines of San Luis Obispo County. San Luis
Obispo; EZ Nature Books, 1994.
Harth, Stan, Liz Krieger, Dan Krieger, editors. War Comes to the Middle Kingdom: California's
Central Coast Enters World War II. San Luis Obispo: EZ books, 1991.
Hedman, Richard and Andrew Jaszewski. Fundamentals of Urban Design. Washington D.C.:
Planners Press, 1984.
Jennings, Jan and Herbert Gottfried. American Vernacular Interior Architecture 1870 -1940.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.
Knighton, Petree A. A Path to Parity: Adopting a Historic Preservation Element to the General
Plan. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley, 2002.
Lovell, Margaret. Historical Resources Survey II Completion Report. City of San Luis Obispo,
completed January 1992.
-79-
McAlester, Virginia and Lee McAlester. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Knopf,
2006.
McKeen, Rose. Parade Along the Creek: Memories of Growing Up with San Luis Obispo. San
Luis Obispo: Central Coast, 1988.
Moms, Marya. Innovative Tools for Historic Preservation. Washington D.C.: The National
Trust, 1992.
Nelson, Mane Preservation Planning and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards: Historic
Contexts and Surveys. Sacramento: California Office of Historic Preservation, 14th
September 2009.
Roche, John J. "A Historical and Architectural Survey of the Central Business District of San
Luis Obispo." City and Regional Planning Department and the School of Architecture
and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo.
March 1983.
San Luis Obispo Fire Department: Souvenir of San Luis Obispo. San Luis Obispo: Tigner, 1904.
San Luis Obispo County Telegram- Tribune. San Luis Obispo Tribune Souvenir Railroad
Edition, May 5`h, 1894. San Luis Obispo: Library Associates, 1994.
Secretary of the Interior. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Properties. US Department of the Interior 1995.
Schmickle, Bill. The Politics of Historic Districts: A Primer for Grassroots Preservation.
Lanham: Altamira Press, 2007.
Stipe, Robert E. ed. A Richer Heritage: Historic Preservation in the Twenty-first Century.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.
Tonello, Greg. Architecture of San Luis Obispo the Historic Photographs. San Luis Obispo;
School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State
University California, San Luis Obispo, 1982.
U.S. Department of the Interior. National Parks Service. National Register of Historic Places
Registration Form: William Shipsey House, prepared by Betsy Bertrando. Sacramento,
2009.
U.S. Department of the Interior. National Parks Service. Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National
Register Criteria for Evaluation. Washington D.C., 2002
Wall, Richard. "A Supplemental Survey of the Cultural Resources of San Luis Obispo, .
California." Masters Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 1986.
W:DE
J
Winslow, Carleton. Discovering San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo; School of
Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, San
Luis Obispo, 1972.
Winter an d Company. "Defining Neighborhood Design Character and Developing Design
Guidelines," in Guiding History: A Process for Creating Historic District Guidelines,
1996.
W:11E
5.7 Council Resolution
�\ O
(to be added)
MEM
O O
RESOLUTION NO. 10228 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD A CONTRACT FOR THE IMMEDIATE
REPLACEMENT OF THE SEWERLINE UNDER THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
AT MCMILLAN AVENUE
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2010, the City received written notification that Union Pacific
Railroad ( "Railroad ") would be replacing a bridge north of the intersection of McMillan Avenue
and Morrison Street ( "Railroad Project "), which is structurally unsound and in imminent danger
of collapsing and that a City sewerline is in conflict with the Railroad Project and would need to
be relocated; and
WHEREAS, the City has a 1999 agreement with the Railroad that requires relocation of
this sewerline when the Railroad finds such action necessary; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested that the Railroad delay the Project to allow the City
more time to prepare to move the sewerline, but due to the instability of the bridge, the Railroad
is unable to postpone the Railroad Project for a time period that would allow the City to comply
with competitive bidding requirements; and
WHEREAS, if the City does not undertake relocation of the sewerline under the
Railroad's timeline, the health, safety and welfare of the public will be compromised; and
WHEREAS, at least four -fifths of the City Council finds that an emergency exists due to
the instability of the bridge north of the intersection of McMillan Avenue and Morrison Street,
which requires immediate relocation of the sewerline to allow the Railroad's Project to go
forward to prevent a potential train derailment and/or to prevent damage to the sewerline; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a plans and specification package for the relocation of
the sewerline that is impacted by the Railroad Project; and
WHEREAS, the City may suspend bidding requirements for emergency projects when in
the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
passage and adoption.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 20168 and 22050, the City
Council hereby declares that the instability of the bridge north of the intersection of McMillan
Avenue and Morrison Street constitutes an emergency that requires the City to relocate its
sewerline immediately to facilitate the Railroad Project to stabilize the bridge.
R 10228
Resolution No. 10228 (20'W Series)
Page 2
SECTION 3. Pursuant to Public Contract Code sections 20168 and 22050, and any other
applicable exception, the City hereby suspends the application of public bidding requirements
found in the Charter and state law to the relocation of the sewerline, which is impacted by the
Railroad Project.
SECTION 4. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement
between the City of San Luis Obispo and the Contractor for the relocation of the sewerline
impacted by the Railroad's Project.
SECTION 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with the
contractor who submits the lowest, responsible estimate to perform the work necessary to
relocate the sewerline impacted by the Railroad's Project not to exceed the Engineer's Estimate,
and to take any other action as deemed appropriate to abate the threat to the public's safety and
property caused by the instability of the bridge. If the City Manager takes any further action or
must enter into a contract that exceeds the Engineer's Estimate, the City Manager shall report
such action taken to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The authority
granted to the City Manager herein shall terminate upon completion of the relocation of the
sewerline impacted by the Railroad's Project.
Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council member Settle, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of October 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROV D AS TO FORM:
t
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
C� O
RESOLUTION NO. 10227 (2010 Series)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING THE BASIS
FOR AND THE LEVY OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR THE SAN LUIS OBISPO
TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, AND AFFIRMING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Parking and Business Improvement Law of 1989, sections 36500 et seq.
of the Streets and Highways Code, authorizes cities to establish business improvement districts
for several purposes, one of which is promotion of tourism; and
WHEREAS, the lodging businesses within the proposed City of San Luis Obispo
Tourism Business Improvement District had requested the City of San Luis Obispo establish
such a self- assessment improvement district in 2008; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Tourism Business Improvement District was
established in July 2008, and the San Luis Obispo Tourism Business Improvement District law
was incorporated into the Municipal Code as Chapter 12.42; and
WHEREAS, the City Council appointed an advisory board to carry out the functions
specified in Street and Highways Code Section 36530, and to provide oversight, guidance, and
recommendations regarding the use of the assessment funds; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Tourism Business Improvement District law and the
Parking and Business Improvement Law of 1989 requires the advisory body to prepare and
submit an annual report stating proposed changes, improvements and activities for the fiscal
year; and
WHEREAS, such report was filed and approved by the City Council on September 21,
2010; and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2010 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10217
(2010 Series) declaring its intention to continue the San Luis Obispo Tourism Business
Improvement District in 2010 -11; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 19, 2010 to
allow for protests, as contemplated by Streets and Highway Code Section 36524; and
WHEREAS, sufficient written or oral protest were not received from hotel businesses in
the district which pay. fifty percent or more of the assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo as follows:
A. The establishment of Tourism Business Improvement District in the City of San Luis
Obispo in accordance with the San Luis Obispo Tourism Business Improvement District law,
San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 12.42, and the California Streets and Highways
Code, section 36500 et seq. (Parking and Business Improvement Law of 1989) is affirmed.
R 10227
Resolution No. 10227 (201 v Series) J
Page 2
B. The assessment levied by the Tourism Business Improvement District shall be used to
promote lodging at the hotels within the district and administer marketing programs that
increase overnight lodging.
C. The assessment shall be levied and allocated by the City of San Luis Obispo.
D. The assessment shall to be levied on all "hotels ", as that term is defined in San Luis
Obispo Municipal Code section 3.04.020, to wit: any structure, or any portion of any
structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for
dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house,
motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house,
dormitory, public or private club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other
similar structure or portion thereof.
E. The assessment shall be based on two percent (2 %) of gross room rent.
F. New hotels shall not be exempt from assessment.
Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Marx, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of October 2010.
ATTEST:
Elaina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 10226 (2010 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING AN
EXPENDITURE OF $100,000 FROM THE 2010 -11 STATE BUDGET TO CONTINUE
FUNDING PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL
WHEREAS, the adoption of the 2010 -11 State budget, includes continuation of AB 1913
which established the Supplemental Local Law Enforcement Fund; and
WHEREAS, AB 1913 appropriated $100 million to supplement local law enforcement
budgets; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has been allocated $100,000 from the 2010 -11
California State budget as granted under AB 1913; and
WHEREAS, the funds may be applied to projects and front line municipal police
services which are in existing budgets but are under - funded; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on October 19, 2010, to receive public input on
the recommendations for the use of these funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of San Luis
Obispo approves the expenditure of $100,000 as received from the 2010 -11 California State
budget to assist in funding Public Safety personnel, and authorizes the Chief of Police to execute
any grant related documents.
Upon motion of Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Settle, and on
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Marx and Settle, Vice Mayor Carter and
Mayor Romero
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19`h day of October 2010.
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
1 '
E aina Cano
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO
'tine Dietrick
City Attorney
R 10226