The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10410-10416 RESOLUTION NO. 10410 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2012 WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held in the City of San Luis Obispo on Tuesday, November 6, 2012, as required by State Law and the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo, for the purpose of electing one Mayor and two Members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, one ballot measure regarding Utility Users Tax on telecommunication and video services (Measure D-12) was submitted to the voters on Tuesday,November 6, 2012; and WHEREAS, the Results of the Canvass of All Votes Cast at the Consolidated General Election held on November 6, 2012, have been certified by the County Clerk-Recorder and is attached and made a part hereof and are hereby entered by the City Clerk in the official records of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that: SECTION 1. The whole number of votes cast in said election within the City of San Luis Obispo is reflected in the attached Canvass of All Votes Cast. SECTION 2. The names of the persons voted for at the election for Mayor were: Donald E. Hedrick Jan Marx Steve Barasch SECTION 3. Jan Marx, the candidate receiving the highest number of votes cast at said election for the Office of Mayor, is hereby declared elected to such office for a term ending December 1, 2014. SECTION 4. The names of the persons voted for at the election for Council Member were: Dan Carpenter John B. Ashbaugh JeffAranguena Matt Sttzepek Kevin Rice SECTION 5. Dan Carpenter and John B. Ashbaugh, the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes cast at said election for the Office of City Council Member, are hereby declared elected to such office each for terms ending December 1, 2016. R.10410 Resolution No. 10410 (2012 Series) Page 2 SECTION 6. That the ballot measure submitted to the voters was as follows: MEASURE D-12 Shall an ordinance be adopted that would 1) reduce the City of San Luis Yes Obispo's current Utility Users Tax on telecommunication and video services from 5% to 4.8%; 2) clarify the scope and application of the tax -------------------- to all taxable utilities; and 3) modernize the method of calculating and collecting the tax to reflect technological advances and changes in state No and federal law so that all taxpayers are treated equally regardless of technology used? SECTION 7. MEASURE D-12 did receive a majority vote in favor and is hereby declared ratified. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall sign and deliver to each duly elected officer a Certificate of Election certifying to his/her election, and further, the City Clerk is directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the original Book of Resolutions. SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 9269 of the California Elections Code, the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward to the Secretary of State a certified copy of the affidavit of publication in connection with Measure D-12, a copy of all ballot arguments relating to Measure D-12 and a certified copy of this resolution declaring the results of the election. Upon motion of Council Member Carter,seconded by Council Member Smith and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter and Smith, Vice Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None Resolution No. 10410 (2012 Series) Page 3 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 3rd day of December 2012. a MA",� ay Jan Marx ATTEST;:\:.: =-- Maeve:'k:e .e y Grim City Clerk ; APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Christine Dietrick City Attorney Statement of Votes Cast Date:1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:196 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DONALD E, JAN MARX HEDRICK Total - - - - - - CON 223 Polling 1146 316 278 14 5.04% 174 62.59% Vote By Mail 1146 381 350 8 2.29% 217 62.00% Total 1146 697 628 22 3.50% 391 62.26% CON 2?4 Polling 1362 374 317 31 9.78% 183 57.73% Vote By Mail 1362 359 323 19 5.88% 200 61.92% Total 1362 733 640 50 7.81% 383 59.84% CON 225 Polling 1249 409 359 20 5.57% 209 58.22% Vote By Mail 1249 418 382 13 3.40% 241 63.090% Total 1249 827 741 33 4.45% 450 60.73% CON 226 Polling 1489 435 364 44 12.09% 188 51.65% Vote By Mail 1489 405 366 30 8.20% 229 62.57% Total 1489 840 730 74 10.14% 417 57.12% CON 2-17 Polling - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - CON 301 Polling 1671 425 380 36 9.47% 194 51.05% Vote By Mail 1671 558 501 21 4.19% 317 63.27% Total 1671 983 881 57 6.47% 511 58.00% CON 302 Polling 928 248 219 28 12.79% 117 53.42% Vote Bv.Mail 928 334 297 17 5.72% 176 59.26% Total 928 582. 516 45 8.72% 293 56.78% CON 303 Polling 1034 270 234 21 8.97% 137 58.55% Vote By Mail 1034 357 326 22 6.75% 203 62.270% Total 1034 627 560 43 7.68% 340 60.71% CON 304 Polling 1265 286 253 15 5.93% 154 60.870/6 Vote By Mail 1265 507 466 22 4'.72% 318 68.24% Total 1265 793 719 37 5.15% 472 65.65% CON 305 Polling 834 249 217 31 14.29%- 129 59.45% Vote By Mail 834 235 217 12. 5.53% 137 63.13% Total 834 484 434 43 9.91% 266 61.29% CON 306 Polling 936 253 213 II 5.16% 132 61.97% Vote By Mail 936 341 308 17 5.52% 218 70.78% Total 936 594 521 28 5.37% 350 67.18% CON 307 Polling 994 252 221 26 11.76% 131 59.28°/a Vote By Mail 994 296 256 14 5.47% 166 64.84% Total 994 548 477 40 8.39% 297 62.26% CON 308 Polling 942 221 202 7 3.47% 145 71.78% Vote By Mail 942 376 344 23 6.69% 217 63.08% Total 942 597 546 30 5.49% 362 66.30% CON 309 Polling 854 210 195 8 4.10% 130 66.67% Vote By Mail 854 318 291 15 5.15% 175 60.14%- Total 854 528 486 23 4.73% 305 62.76% CON 310 Polling 977 315 284 19 6.69% 197 69.37% Vote By Mail 977 297 275 8 2.91% 215 78.18% Statement of Votes Cast Date:1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:197 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg,Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DONALD E. JAN MARX HEDRICK Total 977 612 559 27 4.83% 412 73.700/. CON 311 Polling 1099 311 277 28 10.11% 171 61.73% Vote By Mail 1099 313 295 21 7.12% 170 57.63% Total 1099 624 572 49 8.57% 341 59.62% CON 312 Polling 1191 371 322 34 10.56% 193 59.940/6 Vote By Mail 1191 290 254 13 5.12% 183 72.05% Total 1191 661 576 47 8.16% 376 65.28% CON 313 Polling 1077 347 292 33 11.30% 197 67.47% Vote BvMail 1077 262 238 22 9.24% 159 66.81% Total 1077 609 530 55 10.38% 356 67:17% CON 314 Polling 981 241 200 15 7.50% 114 57.00% Vote By Mail 981 371 355 9 2.54% 240 67.61% Total 981 612 555 24 4.32% 354 63.78% CON 315 Polling - - _ - Vote By Mail - Total CON 316 Palling - - - Vote By Mail ' Total - CON 317 Polling - Vote By Mail Total - - - CON 318 Polling - Vote By Mail " Total. - _ - CON 319 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 320 Polling Vote By Mail - Total CON 321 Polling Vote By Mail - - Total CON 322 Polling Vote By Mail - Total CON 323 Polling Vote By Mail - Total - - CON 324 Polling Vote By Mail - Total CON 325 Polling Vote By Mail - Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:201 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DONALD E. JAN MARX HEDRICK Total CON 517 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 518 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 519 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 520 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 521 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - CON 522 Polling - - Vote By Mail Total CON 523 Polling - - Vote By Mail Total - CON 524 Polling 1100 324 260 26 10.00% 164 63.08% Vote By Mail 1100 282 256 14 5.47% 170 66.41% Total 1100 606 516 40 7.75% .334 64.73% CON 525 Polling _ 1073 317 241 34 14.11% 148 61.410,/. Vote By Mail 1073 248 223 21 9.42% 144 64.57% Total 1073 565 464 55 11.85% 292 62.93% CON 526 Polling 1022 261 223 20 8.97% 133 59.64% Vote By Mail 1022 282 255 12 4.71% 178. 69.80% Total 1022 543 478 32 6.69% 311 65.06% CON 527 Polling 1389 332 258 37 14.34% 140 54.26% Vote By Mail 1389 352 304 12 3.95% 232 76320/6 Total 1389 684 562 49 8.72% 372 66.19% CON 528 Polling 1378 324 221 22 9.95% 136 61.54% Vote By Mail 1378 89 67 5 7.46% 44 65.67% Total 1378 413 288 27 9.38% 180 62.50% CON 529 Polling 1073 296 229 19 8,30% 131 57.21% Vote By Mail 1073 201 184 8 4.35% 124 67.39% Total 1073 497 413 27 6.54% 255 61.74% MB03 Polling - - - - ' Vote By Mail - Total MB05 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - - Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:202 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg.Voters BallotsCast Total Votes DONALD E. JAN MARX HEDRICK MB06 Polling Vote By Mail - Total - - - - MB07 Polling - Vote By Mail - Total MB 10 Polling - Vote By Mail Total - MB 14 Polling - - - - Vote By Mail Total MB 19 Polling Vote By Mail Total MB20 Polling - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - MB22 Palling - -Vote By Mail - Total MB23 Polling - - Vote By Mail " Total - - MB25 Polling Vote By Mail ' Total MB26 Polling Vote By Mail Total Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% CONGRESSIONAL 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% 24TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% SENATE 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 .59.87% 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:I 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:203 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DONALD E. IAN MARX HEDRICK Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 925% 3747 59.87% 0 0 Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% ASSEMBLY 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% 37TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIST 2 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.870/6 SUPERVISOR/COMMISSIONER 0 0 0 0 - 0 - ISTSUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Polling Vote By Mail Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 2ND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 5246 1534 1318 109 8.27% 754 57.21% Vote By Mail 5246 1563 1421 70 4.93% 887 62.42% Total 5246 3097 2739 179 6.54% 1641 59.91% 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 14783 3999 3509 312 8.89% 2141 61.01% Vote By Mail 14783 4855 4423 236 5.34% 2894 65.43% Total 14783 8854 7932 548 6.91°% 5035 63.48% 4TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 5TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 7035 1854 1432 158 11.03% 852 59.50% Vote By Mail 7035 1454 1289 72 5.59% 892 6920% Total 7035 3308 2721 230 8.45% 1744 64.09% Multiple Districts Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% CITIES 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Polling Statement of Votes Cast Date'11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:204 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DONALD E. JAN MARX HEDRICK Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF GROVER BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF MORRO BAY Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 0 - CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% CITY OF PISMO BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ATASCADERO Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 UNINCORPORATED AREAS Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total Polling 27064 7387 6259 579 9.25% 3747 59.87% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 7133 378 5.30% 4673 65.51% Total 27064 15259 13392 957 7.15% 8420 62.87% Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:208 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVEBARASCH Write-In Votes Total - CON 223 Polling 88 31.65% 2 0.72% Vote By Mail 124 35.43% 1 0.29% Total 212 33.76% 3 0.48% CON L-14 Polling 101 31.86% 2 0.63% Vote By Mail 102 31.58% 2 0.62% Total 203 31.72% 4 0.63% CON 225 Polling 128 35.65% 2 0.56% Vote By Mail 126 32.98% 2 0.52% Total 254 34.28% 4 0.54% CON 226 Polling 131 35.99% 1 0.27% Vote By Mail 105 28.690/. 2 0.55% Total 236 32.33% 3 0.41% CON 2-17 Polling - - Vote By Mail Total CON 301 Polling 149 39.21% 1 0.26% Vote By Mail 161 32.14% 2 0.40% Total 310 35.19% 3 0.34% CON 302 Polling 73 33.33% 1 0.46% Vote By Mail 103 34.68% 1 0.34% Total 176 34.11% 2 0.39% CON 303 Polling 75 32.05% 1 0.43% Vote By Mail 98 30.06% 3 0.92% Total 173 30.89% 4 0.71% CON 304 Polling 84 33.20% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 122 26.18% 4 0.86% Total 206 28.65% 4 0.56% CON 305 Polling 55 25.35% 2 0.92% Vote Be Mail 68 31.34% 0 0.00% Total 123 28.34% 2 0.46% CON 306 Polling 69 32.39°/ 1 0.47% Vote By Mail 72 23.38% 1 032% Total 141 27.06% 2 038% CON 307 Polling 64 28.96% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 75 29.30°/. 1 0.39% Total 139 29.14% 1 0,21% CON 308 Polling 49 24.26% 1 0.50% Vote By Mail 103 29.94% 1 0.29% Total 152 27.84% 2 0.37% CON 309 Polling 56 28.720/. 1 0.51% Vote By Mail 98 33.68% 3 1.03% Total 154 31.69% 4 0.82% CON 310 Polling 67 23.59% 1 0.35% Vote By Mail 52 18.91% 0 0.00% Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:16 Page:209 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVEBARASCH Write-In Votes Total 119 21.29% 1 0.18% CON 311 Polling 77 27.80% 1 0.36% Vote By Mail 103 34.92% 1 0.34% Total 180 31.47% 2 0.35% CON 312 Polling 93 28.88% 2 0.62% Vote By Mail 56 22.05% 2 0.79% Total 149 25.87% 4 0.69% CON 313 Polling 61 20.89% 1 0.34% Vote By Mail 56 23.53% 1 0.42% Total 117 22.08% 2 0.38% CON 314 Polling 70 35.00% 1 0.50% Vote By Mail 106 29.86% 0 0.00% Total 176 31.71% 1 0.18% CON 315 Polling - - ' Vote By Mail - - - Total - CON 316 Polling - " Vote$v Mail - Total - CON 317 Polling - Vote By Mail Total CON 318 Polling - - Vote By Mail - - - Total CON 319 Polling Vote By Mail - - - Total CON 320 Polling Vote By Mail - - Total - CON 321 Polling - - Vote By Mail - Total - CON 322 Polling - - - Vote By Mail Total - CON 323 Polling - Vote By Mail - Total - CON 324 Polling - Vote By Mail Total CON 325 Polling - - - Vote By Mail - Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:213 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVE BARASCH Write-In Votes Total CON 517 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 518 Polling Vote By Mail - - Total CON 519 Polling - Vote By Mail - Total - CON 520 Polling - Vote By Mail Total CON 521 Polling - Vote By Mail - Total CON 522 Polling Vote By Mail " Total CON 523 Polling - VoteBv Mail - Total - - CON 524 Polling 69 26.54% 1 0.38% Vote By Mail 71 27.73% 1 0.39% Total 140 27.13% 2 0.39% CON 525 Polling 58 24.07% 1 0.41% Vote By Mail 58 26.01% 0 0.00% Total 116 25.00% 1 0.22% CON 526 Polling 69 30.94% 1 0.45% Vote By Mail 65 25.49% 0 0.00% Total 134 28.03% 1 0.21% CON 527 Polling 79 30.62% 2 0.78% Vote By Mail 60 19.74% 0 0.00% Total 139 24.73% 2 0.36% CON 528 Polling 60 27.15% 3 1.36% Vote By Mail 18 26.87% 0 0.00% Total 78 27.08% 3 1.04% CON 529 Polling 72 31.44% 7 3.06% Vote By Mail 52. 28.26% 0 0.00% Total 124 30.02% 7 1.69% MB03 Polling - " Vote BV Mail Total MB05 Polling Vote Bv Mail - Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:214 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVE BARASCH Write-In Votes MB06 Polling - - - Vote By Mail - Total - MB07 Polling - - - Vote By Mail - - Total MB 10 Polling - - Vote By Mail - Total - MB 14 Polling - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - MB 19 Polling - Vote By Mail - Total MB20 Polling - - Vote By Mail - - Total MB22 Polling - Vote By Mail ' Total - MB23 Polling - ' Vote By Mail - Total - MB25 Polling Vote By Mail - Total - - - MB26 Polling - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.500/. 64 0.48% CONGRESSIONAL 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% 24TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2054 28.80% 28 0.39°/ Polling Vote By Mail Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% SENATE 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Polling Vote By Mail Total 3951 29.50% 64 0:48% Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:215 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVE BARASCH Write-In Votes Palling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% o o Total 3951 29.500/. 64 0.48% ASSEMBLY 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Polling Vote By Mail Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% 37TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Polling 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 - Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIST 2 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Polling Vote By Mail Total 3951 29.500/6 64 0.48% Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% SUPERVISOR/COMMISSIONER 0 - 0 - ISTSUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 0 - 0 - Polling Vote$v Mail Total 0 - 0 2ND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 448 33.99% 7 0.53% Vote By Mail 457 32.16% 7 0.49% Total 905 33.04% 14 0.51% 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 1042 29.70% 14 0.40% Vote By Mail 1273 28.78% 20 0.45% Total 2315 29.19% 34 0.43% 4TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 - Total 0 - 0 5TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 407 28.42% 15 1.05% Vote By Mail 324 25.14% 1 0.08% Total 731 26.87% 16 0.59% Multiple Districts Polling 0 - 0 Vote By Mail 0 0 Total 0 0 - Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% CITIES 0 - 0 - CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Polling Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:216 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MAYOR STEVE BARASCH Write-In Votes Total 0 0 CITY OF GROVER BEACH. Polling 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 Total 0 0 CITY OF MORRO BAY Polling 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 - 0 Total 0 0 CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES Polling 0 - 0 _ Vote By Mail 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 - CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Polling. 1897 .30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.50% 64 0.48% CITY OFPISMO BEACH Polling 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 - Total 0 - 0 CITY OF ATASCADERO Polling 0 - 0 - VoteBv Mail 0 0 - Total 0 - 0 UNINCORPORATED AREAS Polling 0 - 0 - VoteBv.Mail 0 0 Total 0 0 - Total Polling 1897 30.31% 36 0.58% Vote By Mail 2054 28.80% 28 0.39% Total 3951 29.500/. 64 0.48% Statement of Votes Cast Date:1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:220 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH Total - - - - - - CON 223 Polling 1146 316 472 155 32.84% 151 31.990/6 Vote By Mail 1146 381 600 229 38.17%- 202 33.67% Total 1146 697 1072 384 35.82% 353 32.93% CON 224 Polling 1362 374 512 123 24.02% 157 30.66% Vote By Mail 1362 359 566 182 32.16% 181 31.98% Total 1362 733 1078 305 28.29% 338 31.35% CON 225 Polling 1249 409 575 162 28.17% 190 33.04% Vote By Mail 1249 418 668 237 35.48% 237 35.48% Total 1249 827 1243 399 32.10% 427 34.35% CON 226 Polling 1489 435 569 159 27.94% 156 27.42% Vote By Mail 1489 405 625 205 32.80% 198 31.68% Total 1489 840 1194 364 30.49% 354 29.65% CON 227 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - - - Total - - - - - - - CON 301 Polling 1671 425 579 164 28.32% 156 26.94% Vote By Mail 1671 558 830 274 33.01% 252 30.36% Total 1671 983 1409 438 31.09% 408 28.96% CON 302 Polling 928 248 359 113 31.48% 84 23.40% Vote Bv.Mail 928 334 513 154 30.02% 157 30.60% Total 928 582 872 267 30.62% 241 27.64% CON 303 Polling 1034 270 377 116 30.77% 114 30.240/6 Vote By Mail 1034 357 533 159 29.83% 173 32.46% Total 1034 627 910 275 30.22% 287 31.540/6 CON 304 Polling 1265 286 420 142 33.81% 128 30.48% VoteBv Mail 1265 507 799 283 35.42% 281 35.170/. Total 1265 793 1219 425 34.86% 409 33.55% CON 305 Polling 834 249 345 108 31.300/6 113 32.75% Vote By Mail 834 235 364 107 29.40% 115 31.59% Total 834 484 709 215 30.32% 228 32.16% CON 306 Polling 936 253 364 131 35.99% 115 31.59°/. Vote By Mail 936 341 517 187 36.17% 182 35.200/. Total 936 594 881 318 36.10% 297 33.71% CON 307 Polling 994 252 345 95 27.54% 118 34.20% Vote By Mail 994 296 423 150 35.46% 122 28.84% Total 994 548 768 245 31.90% 240 31.25%. CON 308 Polling 942 221 328 108. 32.93% 118 35.98% Vote By Mail .942 376 589 203 34.47% 203 34.47% Total 942 597 917 311 33.91% 321 35.01% CON 309 Polling 854 210 320 112 35.00% 111 34.69% Vote By Mail 1 854 318 498 204 40.96% 176 35.34% Total 854 528 818 316 38.63% 287 35.09% CON 310 Polling 977 315 449 141 31.40% 143 31.85% Vote By Mail 977 297 465 160 34.41% 167 35.91% Exhibit Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 Time:10:02:17 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Page:221 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEM13ER Reg.Voters BallotsCast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH Total 977 612 914 301 32.93% 310 33.92% CON 311 Polling 1099 311 451 122 27.05% 131 29.05% Vote By Mail 1099 313 494 160 32.39% 141 28.54% Total 1099 624 945 282 29.84% 272 28.78% CON 312 Polling 1191 371 497 135 27.16% 135 27.16% Vote By Mail 1191 290 430 131 30.47% 143 33.26% Total 1191 661 927 266 28.69°/, 278 29.990/. CON 313 Polling 1077 347 462 142 30.74% 132 28.57% Vote By Mail 1077 262 392 123 31.38% 117 29.85% Total 1077 609 854 265 31.03% 249 29.16% CON 314 a 0 95 29.60% Polling 981 41 3_I 105 32.71/0 Vote By Mail 981 371 604 228 37.75% 181 29.97% Total 981 612 925 333 36.00% 276 29.84% CON 315 _ _ - _ Polling - _ Vote By Mail Total - - - CON 316 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - - - CON 317 Polling _ Vote By Mail Total - - - - - CON 318 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - - - CON 319 Polling _ Vote By Mail ' Total CON 320 Polling - Vote By Mail Total - - - - CON 321 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - CON 322 Polling _ Vote By Mail Total CON 323 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - CON 324 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 325 Polling Vote By Mail Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:225 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH Total CON 517 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 518 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 519 Polling Vote By Mail - - - Total CON 520 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 521 Polling Vote By Mail Total CON 522 Polling Vote Bv Mail - Total - - - CON 523 Polling Vote By Mail ' Total CON 524 Polling 1100 324 416 122 29.33% 121 29.09% Vote By Mail 1100 282 431 160 37.12% 146 33.87% Total 1100 606 847 282 33.29% 267 31.52% CON 525 Polling 1073 317 378 103 27.25% 96 25.40% Vote By Mail 1073 248 395 138 34.94°/a 99 25.06% Total 1073 565 773 241 31.18% 195 25.23% CON 526 Polling 1022 261 353 91 25.78% 101 28.61% Vote By Mail 1022 282 449 154 34.30% 157 34.97%. Total 1022 543 802 245 30.55% 258 32.17% CON 527 Polling 1389 332 409 97 23.72% 110 26.89% Vote By Mail 1389 352 532 199 37.41% 169 31.77%. Total 1389 684 941 296 31.46% 279 29.65% CON 528 Polling 1378 324 331 68 20.54% _ 75 22.66%^ Vote By Mail 1378 89 104 25 24.04% 27 25.96% Total 1378 413 435 93 2138% 102 23.45% CON 529 Polling 1073 296 370 104 28,11% 104 28.11% Vote By Mail 1073 201 320 110 34.38% 100. 31.25% Total 1073 497 690 214 31.01% 204 29.57% MB03 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - MB05 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:226 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER _ Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH MB06 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total — MB07 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - - MB 10 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - MB 14 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - - - MB 19 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - MB20 Polling Vote By Mail - - - Total - MB22 Polling - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total MB23 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - - MB25 Polling Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - MB26 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 3234% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% CONGRESSIONAL 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% 24TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 32.34% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.170/. 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162. 34.28% 3926 32.34% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% SENATE 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 12141 4162 3428% 3926 3234% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:227 of 300 SOVC For.Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER Reg,Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 17064 1) 11141 4161 3429% IVA 1134% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.970/. 6880 31.07% ASSEMBLY 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 32.34% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% 37TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - VoteBV.Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 32.34% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIST 2 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 32.34% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.070/6 Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% .3926 32.34% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.970/. 6880 31.07% SUPERVISOR/COMMISSIONER 0 0 0 0 - 0 - ISTSUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Polling Vote By Mail Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 2ND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 5246 1534 2128 599 28.15% 654 30.73% Vote By Mail 5246 1563 2459 853 34.69% 818 33.27% Total 5246 3097 4587 1452 31.65% 1472 32.09% 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 14783 3999 5617 1734 30.87%^ 1693 30.14% Vote By Mail 14783 4855 7451 2523 33.86% 2410 32.34% Total 14783 8854 13068 4257 32.58% 4103 31.40% 4TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 5TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 7035 1854 2257 585 25.92% 607 26.89% Vote By Mail 7035 1454 2231 786 3523% 698 .31.29% Total 7035 3308 4488 1371 30.55% 1305 29,08% Multiple Districts Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total - 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28%. 3926 .32.34% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% CITIES 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Polling Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:228 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER Reg,Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes DAN CARPENTER JOHN B.ASHBAUGH Total 0 0 0 0 0 - CITY OF GROVER BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF MORRO BAY Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28% 3926 32.34% Total 27064 15259 22143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% CITY OF PISMO BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ATASCADERO Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - UNINCORPORATED AREAS Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Totnl 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 10002 2918 29.17% 2954 29.53% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 12141 4162 34.28%. 3926 32.34% Total 27064 15259 2-1143 7080 31.97% 6880 31.07% Statement of Votes Cast Date:1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:232 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER JEFF ARANGUENA MATT STRZEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes Total - - - - - CON Z?3 Polling 82 17.37% 7 148% 75 15.89% 2 0.42% Vote By Mail 75 12.50% 18 3.00% 76 12.67% 0 0.00° Total 157 14.65% 25 2.33% 151 14.09% 2 0.19% CON 224 Polling 123 24.02% 12 2.34% 96 18.75% 1 0.20% Vote By Mail 89 15.72% 17 3.00% 91 16.08% 6 1.06% Total 212 19.67% 29 2.69% 187 17.35% 7 0.65% CON 225 Polling 141 24.52% 18 3.13% 62 10.78% 2 0.35% Vote By Mail 107 16.02% 15 2.25% 70 10.48% 2 0.30% Total 248 19.95% 33 2.65% 132 10.62% 4 0.32% CON 2-16 Polling 116 20.39% 20 3.51% 116 20.39% 2 0.35% Vote By Mail 100 16.00% 10 1.60% 106 16.96% 6 0.96% Total 216 18.09% 30 2.51% 222 18.59% 8 0.67% CON 2'7 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - - CON 301 Polling 109 18.83% 22. 3.80% 124 2142% 4 0.69% Vote By Mail 141 16.99% 22 2.65% 140 16.87% 1 0.12% Total 250 17.74% 44 3.12% 264 18.74% 5 0.35% CON 302 Polling 80 22.28% 14 3.90% 67 18.66% 1 0.28% Vote By Mail 86 16.76% 11 2.14% 104 20.27% 1 0.19% Total 166 19.04% 25 2.87% 171 19.61% 2 0.23% CON 303 Polling 79 20.95% 10 2.65% 57 15.12% 1 0.27% Vote By Mail 89 16.70% 21 3.94% 89 16.70% 2 0.38% Total 168 18.46% 31 3.41% 146 16.04% 3 0.33% CON 304 Polling 87 20.71% 12 2.86% 48 11.43% 3 0.71% Vote By Mail 140 17.52% 16 2.00% 74 9.26% 5 0.63% Total 227 18.62% 28 2.30% 122 10.01% 8 0.66% CON 305 Polling 69 20.00% 7 2.03% 48 13.91% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 75 20.60% 12 3.30% 54 14.84°/ 1 0.27% Total 144 20.31% 19 2.68% 102 1439% 1 0.14% CON 306 Polling 63 17.31% 5 1.37% 50 13.74% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 87 16.83% 12 2.32% 47 9.09% 2 0.39% Total 150 17.03% 17 1.93% 97 11.01% 2 0.23% CON 307 Polling 70 20.29% 9 2.61% 52 15.07% 1 0.29% Vote By Mail 72 17.02% 12 2.84% 66 15.60% 1 0.24% TOW 142 18.49% 21 2.73% 118 15.36% 2 0.26% CON 308 Polling 61 18.60% 4 1.22% 37 11.28% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 109 18.51% 15 2.55% 57 9.68% 2 0.34% Total 170 18.54% 19 2.07% 94 10,25% 2 0.22% CON 309 Polling 50 15.63% 5 1.56% 41 12.81% 1 0.31% Vote BvMail 49 9.84% 9 1.81% 56 11.24% 4 0.80% Total 99 12.10% 14 1.71% 97 11.86% 5 0.61% CON 310 Polling 96 21.38% 12 2.67% 57 12.69% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 83 17.85% 8 1.72% 47 10.11% 0 0.00% Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:233 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER JEFF ARANGUENA MATTSTRZEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes Total 179 19.58% 20 2.19% 104 11.38% 0 0.00% CON 311 Polling 106 23.50% 18 3.99% 72 15.96% 2 0.44% Vote$y Mail 116 23.48% 9 1.82% 67 13.56% 1 0.20% Total 222 23.49% 27 2.86% 139 14.71% 3 0.32% CON 312 Polling 125 25.15% 67 3.42% 79 15.90% 6 1.21% Vote By Mail 81 18.84% 9 2.09% 66 15.35% 0 0.00% Total 206 22.22% 26 2.80% 145 15.64% 6 0.65% CON 313 Polling 105 22.73% 19 4.11% 63 13.64% 1 0.22% Vote BvMail 80 20.41% 20 5.10% 51 13.01% 1 0.26% Total 185 21.66% 39 4.57% 114 13.35% 2 0.23% CON 314 Polling 65 20.25% 12 3.74% 42 13.08% 2 0.62% Vote By Mail 107 17.72% 7 1.16% 80 13.25% 1 0.17% Total 172 18.59% 19 2.05% 122 13.19% 3 0.32% CON 315 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - CON 316 Polling - - - - - - Vote Bv Mail - - Total - - - - - - - CON 317 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - CON 318 Polling - - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - CON 319 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - CON 320 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - - CON 321 Polling - - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 322 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - - CON 323 Polling - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 324 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 325 Polling Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - - Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02.:17 Page:237 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER JEFF ARANGUENA MATT STRZEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes Total - - - - - - - CON 517 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - CON 518 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - CON 519 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - CON 520 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 521 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - CON 522 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 523 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - CON 524 Polling 97 23.32% 12 2.88% 63 15.14% 1 0.24% Vote By Mail 62 14.39% 6 1.39% 56 12.99% 1 0.23% Total 159 18.77% 18 2.13% 119 14.05% 2 0.24% CON 525 Polling 86 22.75% 15 3.97% 78 20.63% 0 0.00% Vote By Mail 83 21.01% 11 2.78% 62 15.70% 2 0.51% Total 169 21.86% 26 3.36% 140 18.11% 2 0.26% CON 526 Polling 85 24.08% 6 1.70% 68 19.26% 2 0.570/. Vote By Mail 76 16.93% 7 1.56% 55 12.25% 0 0.00% Total 161 20.07% 13 1.62% 123 15.34% 2 0.25% CON 527 Polling 102 24.94% 9 220% 90 22.00% 1 0.24% Vote By Mail 90 16.92% 11 2.07% 63 11.84% 0 0.00% Total 192 20.40% 20 2.13% 153 16.26% 1 0.11% CON 528 Polling 89 26.89% 5 1.51% 89 26.89% 5 1.51% Vote By Mail 33 31.73% 2 1.92% 17 16.35% 0 0.00% Total 122 28.05% 7 1.61% 106 24370/. 5 1.15% CON 529 Polling 77 20.81% 7 1.89% 73 19.73% 5 1.35% Vote By Mail 52 16.25% 4 1.25% 54 16.88% 0 0.00% Total 129 18.70% 11 1.59% 127 18.41% 5 0.72% MB03 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - MB05 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - Statement of Votes Cast Date-1 1/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Pa,-e:238 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER ,TEFF ARANGUENA MATT STRZEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes MB06 Polling - - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - - MB07 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - - MB 10 Palling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - MB 14 Polling - - - - Vote By Mail - Total MB 19 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - MB20 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Tocol - - - - - - - MB22 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - - - - - MB23 Polling - - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - NM25 Polling - - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - MB26 Polling - - - - - - - Vow By Mail Total - - - - - - - - Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.570/. 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% CONGRESSIONAL 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% 24TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Polling Vote By Mail Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% SENATE 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Polling Vote By Mail Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:239 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES CITY OF SAN.LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER JEFF ARANGUENA MATT STRTEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% o IR4 134% 1^ Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% ASSEMBLY 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Polling Vote By Mail Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% 37TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIST 2 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Polling Vote By Mail Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% SUPERVISORICOMMISSIONER 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - ISTSUPERVISORIALDISTRICT 0 0 - 0 - 0 Polling Vote By Mail Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 2ND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 462 21.71% 57 2.68% 349 16.40% 7 0.33% Vote By Mail 371 15.09% 60 2.44% 343 13.95% 14 0.57% Total 833 18.16% 117 2.55% 692 15.09% 21 0.46% 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 1165 20.74% 166 2.96% 837 14.90% 22 0.39% Vote By Mail 1315 17.65% 183 2.46% 998 13.39% 22 0.30% Total 2480 18.98% 349 2.67% 1835 14.04% 44 0.34% 4TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 5TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 536 23.75% 54 2.39% 461 20.43% 14 0.62% VoteBv Mail 396 17.75% 41 1.84% 307 13.76% 3 0.13% Total 932 20.77% 95 2.12% 768 17.11% 17 0.38% Multiple Districts Polling 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote BvMail 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% CITIES 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Polling Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 Time:10:02:I CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Page:240 of 30 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide,All Counters,CITIES CITY CONTESTS CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCILMEMBER JEFF ARANGUENA MATT STRZEPEK KEVIN RICE Write-In Votes Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - CITY OF GROVER BEACH Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - CITY OF MORRO BAY Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 0 - CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES Polling 0 - 0 - 0 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 0.32% Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% CITY OF PISMO BEACH Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - CITY OF ATASCADERO Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - UNINCORPORATED AREAS Polling 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 Total 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Total Polling 2163 21.63% 277 2.77% 1647 16.47% 43 0.43% Vote By Mail 2082 17.15% 284 2.34% 1648 13.57% 39 Total 4245 19.17% 561 2.53% 3295 14.88% 82 0.37% Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:244 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES D-12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+1) Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes YES NO Total - - - - - - CON 223 Polling 1146 316 246 201 81.71% 45 18.29%. Vote By Mail 1146 381 313 262 8171% 51 16.29%. Total 1146 697 559 463 82.83% 96 17.17% CON 224 Polling 1362 374 314 263 83.76% 51 16.24% Vote By Mail 1362 359 311 263 84.57% 48 15.43% Total 1362 733 625 526 84.16% 99 15.84% CON 225 Polling 1249 409 315 262 83.17% 53 16.83% Vote By Mail 1249 418 363 306 84.30% 57 15.70% Total 1249 827 678 568 83.78% 110 16.2.1% CON 226 Polling 1489 435 350 273 78.00% 77 22.00% Vote By Mail 1489 405 330 274 83.03% 56 16.97% Total 1489 840 680 547 80.44% 133 19.56% CON 227 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 301 Polling 1671 425 342 284 83.04% 58 16.96% Vote Bv Mail 1671 558 467 383 82.01%. 84 17.990N. Total 1671 983 809 667 82.45% 142 17.55%. CON 302 Polling 928 248 218 176 80.73% 42 19.27% Vote By Mail 928 334 284 234 82.39% 50 17.61% Total 928 .582 502 410 81.67% 92 18.33% CON 303 Polling, 1034 270 225 179 79.56% 46 20.44%. Vote By Mail 1034 357 311 257 82.64% 54 17.36% Total 1034 627 536 436 81.34% 100 18.66% CON 304 Polling 1265 286 241 194 80.50% 47 19.50% Vote By Mail 1265 507 441 374 84.81% 67 15.19% Total 1265 793 682 568 83.28% 114 16.72% CON 305 Polling 834 249 216 182 84.26%. 34 15:74% Vote By Mail 834 235 213 163 76.53% 50 23.47°/ Total 834 484 429 345 80.42% 84 19.58% CON 306 Polling 936 253 210 185 88.10% 25 11.90% Vote By Mail 936 341 302 264 87.42% 38 12.58°/. Total 936 594 512 449 87.70°/ 63 12.300/6 CON 307 Polling 994 252 193 158 81.87% 35 18.13% Vote By Mail 994 296 251 200 79.68% 51 20.32% Total 994 548 444 358 80.63% 86 19.37% CON 308 Polling 942 221 188 155 82.45% 33 17.55% Vote By Mail 942 376 325 280 86.15% 45 13.85% Total 942 597 513 435 84.80°/. 78 15.20% CON 309 Polling 854 210 176 143 81.25% 33 18.75% Vote By Mail 854 318 281 245 87.19% 36 12.81% Total 854 528 457 388 84.90% 69 15.10% CON 310 Polling 977 315 259 217 83.78% 42 16.22% Vote By Mail 977 297 266 21-1 8146% 44 16.54% Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:17 Page:245 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES D-12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+1) Reg.Voters Ballots Cost Total Votes YES NO Total 977 612 525 439 83,62% 86 16.38% CON 311 Polling 1099 311 265 212 80.00% 53 20.00% Vote Bv Mail 1099 313 281 235 83.63% 46 16.37% Total 1099 624 546 447 81.870/. 99 18.13% CON 312 Polling 1191 .371 297 249 83.84% 48 16.16% Vote By Mail 1191 290 251 205 8L67% 46 18.33%. Total 1191 661 548 454 82.85% 94 17.15% CON 313 Polling 1077 347 283 236 83.39% 47 16.61% Vote By Mail 1077 262 217 178 82.03% 39 17.97% Total 1077 609 5o0 414 82.80% 86 17.20% CON 314 Polling 981 241 200 166 83.00% 34 17.00% Vote By Mail 981 371 337 287 85.16% 50 14.84% Total 981 612 537 453 84.36% 84 15.64% CON 315 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 316 Polling - - - - - - - VoteBv Mail Total - - - - - - CON 317 Polling - - - - - - - VoteBv Mail Total - - - - - CON 318 Polling - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - CON 319 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - CON 320 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - CON 321 Polling - Vote By Mail . Total - - - - - - - CON 322 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - CON 323 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - CON 324 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - CON 325 Polling - - - - -Vote By Mail -Total - Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:18 Page:249 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES 0.12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+1) Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes YES NO - Total - - CON 517 Polling - Vote By Mail - - - Total - CON 518 Polling - - Vote By Mail - - - - - Total - - - - - - CON 519 Polling - - - - VoteBv Mail - - - - Total CON 520 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - CON 521 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Total - - - - - - CON 522 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - CON 523 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - CON 524 Polling 1100 324 267 223 83.52% 44 16.48% Vote By Mail 1100 282 247 214 86.64% 33 13.36% Total 1100 606 514 437 85.02% 77 14.98% CON 525 Polling 1073 317 248 205 82.66% 43 17.34% Vote By Mail 1073 248 217 192 88.48% 25 11.52% Total 1073 565 465 397 85.38% 68 14.620/6 CON 526 Polling 1022 261 209 173 82.78% 36 17.22% Vote By Mail 1022 282 263 227 86.31% 36 13.69% Total 1022 543 472 400 84.75% 72 15.25% CON 527 Polling 1389 332 270 232 85.93% 38 14.07% Vote By Mail 1389 352 283 245 86.57% 38 13.43%- Total 1389 684 553 477 86.26% 76 13.74% CON 528 Polling 1378 324 216 191 88.43% 25 11.57% Vote By Mail 1378 89 64 57 89.06% 7 10.94% Total 1378 413 280 248 88.57% 32 11.43% CON 529 Polling 1073 296 228 188 82.46% 40 17.54% Vote By Mail 1073 201 178 153 85.96% 25 14.04% Total 1073 497 406 341 83.99% 65 16.01% MB03 Polling - - - - - Vote Bv Mail - - Total - - - - MB05 Polling - - - - Vote By Mail - - - Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:18 Page:250 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES D-12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+1) Reg Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes YES NO MB06 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - MB07 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - - MB 10 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail. Total - - - - - - - MB 14 Polling - - Vote By Mail - - Total - - - - MB 19 Polling - - - - - - - Vote By Mail - Total - - - - - - MB20 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - MB22 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - MB23 Polling - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - MB25 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - MB26 Polling - - - - - - Vote By Mail Total - - - - - - - Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% CONGRESSIONAL 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% 24TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17%. 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% SENATE 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% Total Statement of Votes Cast Date:11/07/12 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Time:10:02:18 Page:251 of 300 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, CITIES D-12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+1) - Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes YES NO Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% o/ 1076 1 S RI-A Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% ASSEMBLY 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% 35TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% 37TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail- 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DIST 2 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Polling Vote By Mail Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% SUPERVISOR/COMMISSIONER 0 0 0 0 - 0 - ISTSUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Polling Vote By Mail Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 2ND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 5246 1534 1225 999 81.55% 226 18.45% Vote By Mail 5246 1563 1317 1105 83.90% 212 16.10% Total 5246 3097 2542 2104 82.77% 438 17.23% 3RD SUPERVISORLIL DISTRICT Polling 14783 3999 3313 2736 82.58% 577 17.42% Vote By Mail 14783 4855 4227 3527 83.44% 700 16.56% Total 14783 9854 7540 6263 83.06% 1277 16.94% 4TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 5TH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT Polling 7035 1854 1438 1212 84.28% 226 15.72% Vote By Mail 7035 1454 1252 1088 86.90% 164 13.10% Total 7035 3308 2690 2300 85.50% 390 14.50% Multiple Districts Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16:48% CITIES 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE Polling Statement of Votes Cast Daze:11/07/1 Time:10:02:1 CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION Page:252 of 30 SOVC For Jurisdiction Wide,All Counters,CITIES CITY CONTESTS D-12 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UTILITY TAX(50%+l) - - Reg.Voters Ballots Cast Total Votes YES NO Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF GROVER BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF MORRO BAY Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872. 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% CITY OF PISMO BEACH Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - CITY OF ATASCADERO Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 - 0 - UNINCORPORATED AREAS Polling 0 0 0 0 - 0 - Vote By Mail 0 0 0 0 0 - Total 0 0 0 0 0 Total Polling 27064 7387 5976 4947 82.78% 1029 17.22% Vote By Mail 27064 7872 6796 5720 84.17% 1076 15.83% Total 27064 15259 12772 10667 83.52% 2105 16.48% RESOLUTION NO. 10411 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF FRANCHISE ORDINANCE 1564 TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN PIPELINES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF OIL AND OTHER SPECIFIED MATERIALS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPELINE COMPANY TO PHILLIPS 66 PIPELINE LLC AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 22,2013 WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo adopted Ordinance No. 1564 on June 21,2011 granting a franchise to ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company, a Delaware Corporation, for a term of 10 years for the transportation and distribution of oil and other specified materials in the City of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, as a result of a corporate reorganization, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC has assumed all of ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company's properties, rights and obligations, including its pipeline operations in the City of San Luis Obispo and expressly agreed to assume the rights and obligations of ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company under Franchise Ordinance 1564; and WHEREAS, the agreement approved by Ordinance 1564 contains the following key provisions: Purpose: To maintain and operate pipelines for the transportation of oil and hydrocarbons within the City of San Luis Obispo. Type: Non-exclusive Term: 10 years (expiring June 20, 202 1) Fees: Annual franchise fee to the City in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 6231.5(A fee ranging from $0.088 to $0.66 per foot based on pipeline diameter) Bond: One million dollars faithful performance bond Insurance: Ten million dollars liability insurance Indemnity: Franchisee to indemnify the City for any and all damages to persons or property arising out of operations under the franchise. Includes indemnity for joint acts with the City. In addition, the Franchise covers all other subjects commonly found in such franchise documents such as: the type of maintenance and operation of the pipelines, permitted transfers of the franchise, requirements for moving pipelines to accommodate public works and utilities, encroachment permits, and pipeline abandonment and removal requirements; and WHEREAS, in lieu of providing audited financial statements certified by an independent certified public accountant, which are unavailable due to Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC being a new R 10411 Resolution No. 10411 (2012 Series) Page 2 company, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC has agreed to increase the amount of the faithful performance bond from one million dollars to five million dollars. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 1002 of the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo and Article 17 of Franchise Ordinance 1564, the City Council hereby declares its intention to consent to the transfer of Franchise Ordinance number 1564 from ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company to Phillips 66. SECTION 2. A public hearing will be held on January 22, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City hall, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. Any persons having an interest in the franchise transfer or any objection to the approval of the franchise transfer may appear before the Council and be heard thereon. This date is not less than twenty (20) or more than sixty (60) days after the passage of this resolution, in compliance with Section 1002 of the City Charter. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall publish this resolution at least once within fifteen (15) days of its passage in a newspaper in the City of San Luis Obispo. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Smith and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4th day of December 2012. Maran an Marx ATTE T Maeve ririm - City Clerk, APPROVED AS TO F J. C Stine Dietrick Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10412 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF FRANCHISE ORDINANCE 1569 TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN PIPELINES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF OIL AND OTHER SPECIFIED MATERIALS IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM CONOCOPHILLIPS PIPELINE COMPANY TO PHILLIPS 66 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 22,2013 WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo adopted Ordinance No. 1569 on October 18,2011 granting a franchise to ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company, a Delaware Corporation, for a term of 10 years for the transportation and distribution of oil and other specified materials in the City of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, as a result of a company reorganization, Phillips 66 Company has assumed some of ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company's properties, rights and obligations, including its pipeline operations in the City of San Luis Obispo and expressly agreed to assume the rights and obligations of ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company under Franchise Ordinance 1569. WHEREAS, the agreement approved by Ordinance 1569 contains the following key provisions: Purpose: To maintain and operate pipelines for the transportation of oil and hydrocarbons within the City of San Luis Obispo. Tyue: Non-exclusive Tenn: 10 years (expiring October 17, 2021 ) Fees: Annual franchise fee to the City in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 6231.5 (A fee ranging from $0.088 to $0.66 per foot based on pipeline diameter) Bond: One million dollars faithful performance bond Insurance: Ten million dollars liability insurance Indemnity: Franchisee to indemnify the City for any and all damages to persons or property arising out of operations under the franchise. Includes indemnity for joint acts with the City. In addition, the Franchise covers all other subjects commonly found in such franchise documents such as: the type of maintenance and operation of the pipelines, permitted transfers of the franchise, requirements for moving pipelines to accommodate public works and utilities, encroachment permits, and pipeline abandonment and removal requirements. WHEREAS, in lieu of providing audited financial statements certified by an independent certified public accountant, which are unavailable due to Phillips 66 Company being a new company, Phillips 66 Company has agreed to increase the amount of the faithful performance bond from one million dollars to five million dollars. R 10412 Resolution No. 10412 (2012 Series) Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 1002 of the Charter of the City of San Luis Obispo and Article 17 of Franchise Ordinance 1569, the City Council hereby declares its intention to consent to the transfer of Franchise Ordinance number 1569 from ConocoPhillips Pipeline Company to Phillips 66. SECTION 2. A public hearing will be held on January 22, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City hall, located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. Any persons having an interest in the franchise transfer or any objection to the approval of the franchise transfer may appear before the Council and be heard thereon. This date is not less than twenty (20) or more than sixty (60) days after the passage of this resolution, in compliance with Section 1002 of the City Charter. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall publish this resolution at least once within fifteen (15) days of its passage in a newspaper in the City of San Luis Obispo. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Smith and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4`h day of December 2012. C Mayor . Marx ATTEST: fie_ � b Maeve Grii9s lwaAm City Clerk APPROV R AS TO ;JX51Mstine Dietrick City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10413 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO RATIFYING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority was created by a Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities and County of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, any amendments to the Agreement require ratification by member agencies; and WHEREAS, the last amendment to the Agreement was ratified by the City of San Luis Obispo on November 10, 1998 Resolution 8866 (1998 Series); and WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Board on November 7, 2012, approved minor language edits and clarifying amendments for the ratification by member agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo does ratify the second formal amendment of the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority Joint Powers Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement, and forward it to the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Council Member Ashbaugh, and on the following vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Smith and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None the foregoing resolution was adopted this 4`h day December 2012. vy Jan Marx ATTEST: Ma e Kcrii0y Grime City Clerk APP VE AS TO F istine Dietrick City Attorney R 10413 EXHIBIT A SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH: This Agreement is made and entered into this 9h day of March, 1990, and amended on 2°d day of September, 1998, and further amended on , 2012, by and among the incorporated cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, El Paso de Robles, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach and San Luis Obispo, all being municipal corporations in the County of San Luis Obispo, California(hereinafter called"Cities") and the County of San Luis Obispo, a body politic and corporate, and a subdivision of the State of California, (hereinafter called"County"). WHEREAS, Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code (Title 1, Div. 7, Chapter 5, Article 1) provides for agreements between two or more public agencies to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties, subject to certain mandatory provisions contained therein; and WHEREAS, the Cities and County have previously entered into a joint powers agreement for the formation of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments for the purpose of providing, among other things, for a regional transportation agency; and WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments, at a regularly held meeting on May 10, 1989, voted to consolidate the administration of several transportation systems through a regional transit joint powers agreement. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE I General Provisions Section 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement is to exercise the common powers of the member agencies for the formation of a Joint Powers Agreement with full power and authority to own, operate and administer a county-wide public transportation system within the boundaries and over the territory over which the Joint Powers Agency has jurisdiction. Section 2. Name: The official name of the entity shall be San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority and hereafter referred to as RTA. ARTICLE I1 Organization Section 1. Board Members: The membership of the RTA Governing Board shall be the same as the membership of the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (hereinafter referred to as SLOCOG). Section 2. Board Meetings -Voting - Quorum: Regular meetings shall be generally held in the first week of July, September,November, January, March and May or as specified in a Page 2 biannually adopted meeting calendar. Special meetings may be called by the President or upon written request of at least three (3) members of the RTA Board. Voting and quorum provisions shall be the same as those provided in the SLOCOG Joint Powers Agreement. Section 3. Officers: The officers of SLOCOG shall serve as officers of RTA. Section 4. Executive Director: The RTA Board shall designate an Executive Director to operate RTA. The Executive Director shall serve at the pleasure of the RTA Board, with delegated powers to certify documents of the RTA Board as required by the law and to assume such duties and responsibilities as the Board may direct. Section 5. Members: 1. The County of San Luis Obispo and all cities incorporated in the County of San Luis Obispo presently or in the future, are declared eligible for membership. 2. Member city agencies may elect to have an alternate member(s) from their city council in addition to any official member, but said alternate(s) shall be able to vote only in the absence of the official representative. 3. Membership shall be contingent upon the execution of this Joint Powers Agreement. Section 6. Boundaries and Service Levels: The service area boundaries shall be all of the area within the boundaries of San Luis Obispo County as designated by the RTA Board. Any additional services beyond the level recommended by the Regional Transportation Plan or mandated in the Unmet Transit Needs Hearing (PUC Section 99401.5) may be instituted, but shall require unanimous approval of affected jurisdictions, with costs for the extra service to be distributed on the basis of formula developed by the RTA Board members representing the affected jurisdictions. Section 7. Committees: 1. Committees and subcommittees may be established as RTA may deem appropriate. 2. Membership on"ad-Hoc"policy committees shall be at the discretion of the President. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit membership on these aforesaid committees to officials of the member agencies. The President may appoint any individual deemed qualified to serve on a committee. 3. Standing committees shall include the: Page 3 a. Regional Transit Advisory Committee (RTAC) serving as a Regional Transit Productivity Committee to advise the Board on the efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system. b. An Executive Committee comprised of the President, Vice President and the past President and at least one representatives from the county of San Luis Obispo (if none of the above) shall advise the Executive Director and RTA on: draft agendas, personnel issues, budget and Overall Work Program; controversial, sensitive and major policy issues; and shall facilitate the annual performance evaluation of the Executive Director. Items for review shall be selected by the Executive Director in consultation with the President. All Committee members may include agenda items as they desire. For purposes of conducting business, two members shall constitute a quorum. 4. No committee shall commit RTA on any matter or questions of policy. Such matters or questions can only be decided by RTA. 5. All committees shall receive clerical assistance from RTA staff and, by agreement, SLOCOG staff for the purpose of maintaining minutes of meetings and other such duties as the Executive Director may direct. The chair of each committee shall sign the original copy of the minutes indicating verification of contents upon committee adoption. Copies of minutes of all meetings shall be sent to members of RTA and the Executive Director. ARTICLE III Financial Provisions Section 1. Budeet: The Executive Director shall prepare an annual budget for RTA adoption prior to commencement of each fiscal year. The approval of the Annual Budget shall be in accordance with those procedures prescribed by the Joint Powers Agreement of SLOCOG. Accounting practices to be applied will conform with those used by San Luis Obispo County, consistent with Transportation Development Act rules and regulations. A Consolidated Fund balance and cash balance will carry forward from one year to the next. The budget may additionally carry funds for future fiscal years where necessary to develop a multi-year Capital Improvement Program and to reflect obligations under state or federal funding agreements, to the extent allowable by California law. No member Agency shall be required to expend any of its general fund monies to support the operations of RTA. The operation of the transit system shall be funded from revenues derived from operations, member Transportation Development Act fund contributions, grants, and any other appropriate revenue sources. Each member agency shall make an annual contribution to RTA in accordance with the adopted budget. Page 4 Any formula may be amended upon approval of all jurisdictions affected by that formula and ratified by RTA. All population percentages utilized shall be those annually adopted by SLOCOG for allocating Transportation Development Act Funds based annually on estimates prepared by the State Department of Finance pursuant to Section 2227 of the Revenue and Taxation Code for cities and by the County Planning Department for unincorporated communities. Section 2. Expenditures: RTA may establish procedures and policies to insure competitive prices for the purchases of goods and services. Formal bidding shall not be required unless directed specifically by RTA or unless required by state or federal law. Particularly in the purchase of equipment, including buses, RTA may consider the design, maintenance and operating costs, and other similar factors in determining the most suitable equipment and need not purchase equipment having the lowest initial cost. Section 3. Treasurer and Auditor: Pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.5, the Treasurer of the County of San Luis Obispo is hereby designated as Treasurer of RTA. The Treasurer shall have the powers and duties set forth in Government Code Section 6505.5. The Auditor/Controller of the County of San Luis Obispo is designated as the Auditor of RTA pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.5. Section 4. Annual Audit: RTA shall cause an annual audit to be prepared and filed in accordance with Government Code Section 6505 and Public Utilities Code Section 99245. Section 5. Annual Report: The Executive Director shall prepare and submit an annual report of the operations to the RTA Board, SLOCOG and State Controller within 90 days of the end of the fiscal year pursuant to Public Utilities Code, Section 99243. Section 6. Periodic Reporting: The RTA Board may require periodic reporting of ridership, finances, or other information. It shall be the responsibility of the Executive Director to provide such reports in a form acceptable to the RTA Board. ARTICLE IV Authority Section 1. Powers: RTA shall have all Powers necessary to carry out the purpose of this Agreement, except the power to tax. Its power to expend funds shall be limited only by the availability of funds as set forth in ARTICLE III: Finances, Section 1. The Powers of RTA specifically include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. To solicit bids and negotiate contracts from private enterprise for services and/or operation. 2. To sue or be sued. 3. To employ agents, employees and contract for professional services. Page 5 4. To make and enter contracts, including labor, purchase agreement and employment contracts. 5. To acquire, convey, construct, manage, maintain and operate necessary equipment, building and improvements. 6. To acquire and convey real and personal property. 7. To incur debts, liabilities and obligations, as well as obligations of financial assistance from State and Federal agencies, and to obligate RTA to operate the improvements, equipment or transportation system in accordance with the terms and conditions of said financial assistance. Section 2. RTA is a Public Legal Entity: RTA is a public entity duly formed and existing under the laws of the State of California. It is a separate and distinct legal entity from its member agencies. The debts, duties and obligations created pursuant to this Agreement, shall be solely the obligations of RTA and not those of its officers, employees, members of the Board of Directors or the member agencies. ARTICLE V Miscellaneous Provisions Section 1. Withdrawal of Member: A withdrawing member's financial obligation under this Section is limited to the withdrawing member's pro-rata share of the currently adopted operating budget based upon ARTICLE III, Section 1 within the service area of the obligated commitments affecting the withdrawing member and any SLOCOG's finding as to unmet transit needs that are reasonable to meet pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99401.5. Section 2. Amendment of Agreement: No amendment to this Agreement shall be made without the consent of all member agencies at the time of the amendment. Section 3. Ratification- Effective Date: This Agreement shall be deemed effective as to those parties executing this agreement upon their execution of the agreement. Section 4. Assi ng ability: In the event it is deemed in the best public interest to have RTA operated by another individual or entity, whether public or private, and provided that the assignment complies with State and Federal laws, the agency on affirmative vote of the majority in accordance with Section 2 of ARTICLE 11, may sell, lease or assign all of its real and personal property and cease operations upon such terms and conditions as RTA determines to be reasonable. Section 5. Termination: This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until rescinded by a majority of the member agencies. Section 6. Notification to Secretary of State: Pursuant to Government Code Section 6503.5, RTA shall cause a notice of the execution of this Agreement to be prepared and filed with the Office of the Secretary of the State of California, within thirty (30) days after the Page 6 effective date of any amendment to this Agreement. Until such filings are completed, RTA shall not incur indebtedness of any kind. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove written. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove written. City of Arroyo Grande By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk City of Atascadero By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk City of Grover Beach By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk City of Morro Bay By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk City of Paso Robles By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk Page 7 City of Pismo Beach By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk City of San Luis Obispo By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk County of San Luis Obispo By: Date: Resolution No. Clerk Approved as to form and legal effect: TIM MCNULTY County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 10414 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR AN ENERGY EFFICIENCY LOAN FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION WHEREAS, the California Energy Commission provides loans to schools, hospitals, local governments, special districts, and public care institutions to finance energy efficiency improvements; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo supports reducing its energy usage and carbon footprint; and WHEREAS, the City owns and operates over two thousand street lights that can be converted to a lower power usage LED fixture. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, the following findings: SECTION 1. The City desires to apply for an energy efficiency loan from the California Energy Commission to implement energy efficiency measures; and that if recommended for funding by the California Energy Commission, the City will accept a loan of up to $1,293,980. SECTION 2. That in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the conversion of the street light system to LED that is funded by the loan is exempt under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15302 because it is the replacement of existing facilities at the same location with the same purpose. SECTION 3. That the amount of the loan will be paid in full, plus interest, under the terms and condition of the Loan Agreement, Promissory Note, and Tax Certificate of the California Energy Commission. SECTION 4. The City Manager is authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City, all necessary documents to implement and carry out the purpose of this resolution, and to undertake all actions necessary to undertake and complete the street light conversion. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Vice Mayor Smith, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Smith and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None R 10414 Resolution No. 10414 (2012 Series) Page 2 The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4`f' day of December 2012. a I L,I, May J Marx ATTEST: Qeu� Maeve Gri s City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J&Kisitine Dietrick City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 10415 (2012 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FOR AUTHORIZING A SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 4217 WHEREAS,the City of San Luis Obispo desires to install energy efficient lighting; and WHEREAS, Section 901 of the City Charter is inapplicable to the Project, and thus Chapter 3.24 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code governs the purchase of the Project; and WHEREAS, Section 3.24.060.0 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code authorizes the City to purchase certain products and services without competitive bidding if such product or service or combination thereof can only be purchased from one provider; and WHEREAS, the Project as defined below relates to the purchase of electric power and energy and thus is exempt from competitive bidding under Section 907 of the City Charter;and WHEREAS, the State of California Government Code 4217.12 authorizes local municipalities to enter into energy services and financing agreements, outside of the adopted procurement process, that the governing body finds best serves the public agency; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo desires to use the California Government Code Section 4217.12 as a basis to complete the conversion of the street lighting system to energy efficient lighting through services offered by its energy provider Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the contract with PG&E at a public hearing during a regularly scheduled meeting on December 4, 2012, public notice of which was given at least two weeks in advance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo: SECTION 1. Findings: Based upon the energy savings projections for the project from PG&E, based on anticipated billing rates, the City's staff report, and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the Council hereby finds: The energy efficiency project subject to Government Code 4217 and provide benefits to the public. The cost for the energy efficiency project to convert the street lights will be less than the anticipated marginal cost to the City for the energy that would have been consumed in the absence of the project. R 10415 Resolution No. 10415 (2012 Series) Page 2 The project is exempt from Article IX Section 901 of the City Charter and is allowed by Government Code 4217 and San Luis Obispo Municipal Code section 3.24.060.0 as an energy efficiency project. SECTION 2. The City approves the PG&E agreement amendment substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A. SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City, all necessary documents to implement and carry out the purpose of this resolution, and to undertake all actions necessary to undertake and complete the street light conversion, subject to the City Attorney's approval as to the form of the agreement. Upon motion of Council Member Carter, seconded by Vice Mayor Smith, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter, Vice Mayor Smith and Mayor Marx NOES: None ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4t' day of December 2012. G Ma} r J6 Marx ATTEST: MadYe Ghiiired (7 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. C 'stine Dietrick CiYy Attorney EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo Electric Company sLT Proposal 1 PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 This Proposal is made and entered into as of 20_by and between City of San Luis Obispo("Customer") and Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"). This Proposal is subject to the terms and conditions of the PG&E Services Agreement between Customer and PG&E dated as of February 16, 2012 (the"Agreement"). DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES o Scope of Work: Replace 2263 HPSV lights with LED lights according to the map and LED spreadsheet(identifies each location) in the City of San Luis Obispo. o Number any light poles that are not numbered using badge number stickers provided by PG&E. o Change the rates to LED and provide documentation on the changes and cost for the street lights. o Process the rebates and provide documentation on the changes and cost for the street lights. o Provide a revised GIS-based inventory. Estimated minimum number of days to complete scope of work: 9 to 12 weeks from date of signature on Proposal. Date work is estimated to begin: To Be Determined Customer sites where work is to be performed: See attached map for location. Type and number of street light fixtures to be replaced: See attached spreadsheet for fixtures. Locations may change if street lights are added to or deleted from the project during installation. A final spreadsheet will be given to Customer upon completion of the work If in the process of performing the Service,active bird nests, and/or bee hives, wasps are discovered, PG&E will notify Customer of such condition and discontinue work on affected equipment. MATERIALS DISPOSAL Customer will make space available at Customer-owned property for material storage and disposal during construction. PG&E will hold Customer harmless for damage to stored materials while on Customer's property. Customer site where PG&E may store materials and waste disposal bins: PG&E will store the materials at the following site: Address: To Be Determined Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo Electric Company SLT Proposal 1 PG&E's Contractor will keep the lights that have been replaced in a locked container until taking them to PG&E's yard. Contractor will separate the lamp from the fixture and put them in the appropriate bins. PG&E will label the bins and ship them to a registered disposal facility. PG&E will store the materials at the following site: TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PG&E Contractor shall be required to comply with all applicable federal, state,and local laws, rules,regulations,permits, and codes including without limitation such laws,rules,regulations, permits, and codes with respect to safety and traffic control. COST AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE The services under this Proposal will cost One Million,One Hundred Ten Thousand,Nine Hundred Twenty Five dollars and no cents($1,110,925). (Current estimate - to be adjusted after bids are received) This price does 0 does not O subtract the value of the LED streetlight rebates from the cost to provide the Services. Payment Schedule: Initial Payment: Upon ordering of materials, Customer will be invoiced 50%of the total amount of the contract. Final Payment: Customer will be invoiced for final 50% payment upon completion of this Proposal or when punch list items(if any)have been completed. If Customer chooses to terminate this Proposal prior to completion of the Services,then Customer shall pay PG&E for all costs accrued up to the date of termination, including all materials purchased. PG&E will submit invoices to Customer based on the Payment Schedule. Each invoice will reference the Agreement and this Proposal and be submitted to Customer's billing address as set forth below. Customer will remit payment to PG&E within 14 days after receipt of the invoice. BUSINESS CONTACTS: PG&E's primary business contact for this Proposal: Name: Brent Patera Title: Sales Manager Address: 245 Market Street, Mail Code NIOD San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-265-7232 Email: BXPL c.p,e.com Page 2 of 8 EXHIBIT A 5Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo , 81 Electric Company sLT Proposal 1 Customer's primary business contact for this Proposal: Name: Barbara Lynch Title: City Engineer City of San Luis Obispo Address: 919 Palm StreetSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Telephone: (805) 781-7191 Email: blynchO.slocitv.ore CUSTOMER BILLING CONTACT: Customer's billing contact for this Proposal: Name: Barbara Lynch Title: City Engineer City of San Luis Obispo Address: 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Telephone: (805)781-7191 Email: blvnchaslocirv.or AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT DISCLOSURE PG&E and Customer acknowledge and agree that,to the extent the Services described in this Proposal are, at any point in time, funded in whole or in part using federal funds awarded or granted directly or indirectly to Customer by or through the United States Department of Energy by virtue:of appropriations under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. 111-5 (the"ARRA"),the special terms and conditions set forth in Section 11.5 of the Agreement will apply. This Proposal is O is not 0 funded(in whole or in part)by federal funds appropriated under the ARRA. IN WITNESS THEREOF,the parties agree to be bound by this Proposal as of the date first set forth above. CUSTOMER CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Print Name: Print Roxanne Fong, Manager Name: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Page 3of8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo ' S Electric Company SLT Proposal 1 MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY INFORMATION Street light manufacturer's contact information: The street light manufacturer's contact information and warranty will be attached to each Proposal. Cree LED Lighting Fixtures 1200 92nd Street Sturtevant, Wl 53177-1854 Phone: (800)236-6800 Warranty period: 10 years. Photo control warrantor's contact information: Ripley Lighting Controls 2023 Platt Springs Road P.O. Box 3229 West Columbia, SC 29169 Phone: 803-939-4700 Fax: 803-939-4777 Warranty period: 8 years. Warranty is attached. Page 4 of 8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo Electric Company SLT Proposal Limited Service Warrantv PG&E warrants that the Service will be performed in a commercially reasonable manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by others when performing services of a similar nature under similar circumstances. Customer must notify PG&E of any defect in workmanship within one(1)year of completion of installation of all streetlight fixtures ("Installation"). If Customer notifies PG&E within one year of installation of a potential defect in workmanship, and PG&E confirms the defect, PG&E will either re-perform the Service at no additional charge to Customer,or, if PG&E so elects,refund the applicable fees paid to PG&E by Customer for the Service. This warranty extends to Customer only and cannot be assigned by Customer. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties. All other warranties are expressly disclaimed. Limited Material Warranty The manufacturer of the material to be installed will provide a warranty which is attached. PG&E will provide to the Customer all documentation covering the warranty including contact information for the manufacturer or manufacturer's warranty agent. During the first year following completion of Installation,Customer may contact PG&E(as part of the Limited Service Warranty)to request that PG&E remove the defective light and reinstall the repaired light or an equivalent replacement light. For those years following the Limited Service Warranty period but still within the Limited Material Warranty period,Customer must contact the manufacturer to make a warranty claim. Customer is responsible for removal of the equipment, arranging and paying for shipping and insurance for the equipment to and from the manufacturer's designated facility(and for all risk of loss to the equipment while in transit), and installation of the equipment upon return, unless otherwise instructed in the manufacturer's designated warranty. This warranty extends to Customer only and cannot be assigned by Customer. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties relating to installed materials. ALL OTHER WARRANTIES (WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED) RELATING TO INSTALLED MATERIAL ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Disclaimers Except for warranties expressly set forth in this Agreement, PG&E HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES(WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE, AND INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, INTEROPERABILITY,AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE)RELATING TO THE SERVICE. Customer acknowledges and agrees that the specific remedies described in this Agreement respectively shall be Customer's sole and exclusive remedies for any and all warranty claims arising under or pertaining to this Agreement. Page 5 of 8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo SLT Proposal I & Electric Company LIMITED WARRANTY FOR CREE®LED LIGHTING FIXTURES (INCLUDING BETALEDO TECHNOLOGY; TRUEWHITE®TECHNOLOGY; AND ESSENTIA® FIXTURES) This limited warranty is provided by the Cree company described below("Seller")to you as the original purchaser of the LED lighting product that is identified on Seller's invoice reflecting its original purchase(the"Product"). The Seller is the Cree company identified as such on the invoice. This limited warranty may be transferred to subsequent purchasers of the Product, provided that such Product is resold in new condition and in its original packaging. Seller warrants that the Product,when delivered in new condition and in its original packaging,will be free of defects in material and workmanship for a period of TEN(10)YEARS from the date of original purchase.The determination of whether the Product is defective shall be made by Seller in its sole discretion with consideration given to the overall performance of the Product. A Product shall not be considered defective solely as a result of the failure of individual LED components to emit light if the number of inoperable components is less than 10%of the total number of LED components in the Product. If Seller determines the Product is defective, Seller will elect, in its sole discretion,to refund you the purchase price of the Product,repair the Product or replace the Product.This limited warranty will not apply to loss or damage to the Product caused by: negligence;abuse;misuse; mishandling; improper installation,storage or maintenance; damage due to fire or acts of God; vandalism; civil disturbances; power surges; improper power supply; electrical current fluctuations; corrosive environment installations; induced vibration;harmonic oscillation or resonance associated with movement of air currents around the Product; alteration; accident; failure to follow installation, operating, maintenance or environmental instructions prescribed by Seller or applicable electrical codes; or improper service of the Product performed by someone other than Seller or its authorized service provider.This limited warranty excludes field labor and service charges related to the repair or replacement of the Product. THIS LIMITED WARRANTY IS VOID ]IF THE PRODUCT IS NOT USED FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS DESIGNED. Seller reserves the right to utilize new,reconditioned, refurbished, repaired or remanufactured products or parts in the warranty repair or replacement process. Such products and parts will be comparable in function and performance to an original product or part, as determined by Seller in its sole discretion, and warranted for the remainder of the original warranty period. In order to make a warranty claim,you must notify Seller in writing within sixty(60)days after your discovery of the defect, provide proof of purchase such as the invoice and comply with Seller's other warranty requirements. Upon receiving that notice, Seller may require you to promptly return the Product to Seller,or its authorized service provider,freight prepaid. Your warranty claim should be addressed to Cree c/o Ruud Lighting, Inc., 9201 Washington Avenue, Racine, W1.53406. This limited warranty only applies to specified LED fixtures. Any warranties applicable to finish, poles, lamps, CR Series downlights, LKNTM troffers,certain BetaLED®Technology outdoor fixtures(specifically Class II as defined per IEC/EN60598), backup batteries, controls, occupancy sensors, photocells and other fixture accessories can be found at www.cree.com/lighting/products/warranty. Page 6 of 8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo Electric Company SLT Proposal 1 THE FOREGOING WARRANTY PROVISIONS ARE EXCLUSIVE AND ARE GIVEN AND ACCEPTED IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY WARRANTY AGAINST INFRINGEMENT AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL, COMPENSATORY, CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR OTHER DAMAGES. SELLER'S AGGREGATE LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT SHALL IN ANY EVENT BE LIMITED TO THE MONIES PAID TO SELLER FOR THAT DEFECTIVE PRODUCT. This warranty is effective for purchases of Product on or after the effective date set forth below. Seller reserves the right to modify this warranty from time to time. Any modification of this warranty shall be effective for all orders placed with Seller on or after the effective date of such revised warranty. Page 7 of 8 EXHIBIT A Pacific Gas and Services Agreement San Luis Obispo SLT Proposal 1 S Electric Company 74Z" LIGHTING L k CONTROLS DIVISION OF SOUTHCONN TECHNOLOGIES INC 2023 Platt Springs Road P.O.Box 3229 West Columbia,SC 29169 Phone: 803-939-4700 - Faa: 803-939-4777 WARRANTY The 6300 Series carries an 8-year warranty. If the product fails due to manufacturing defect within its warranted period, Ripley Lighting Controls will choose to either replace or repair the lighting control unit. This warranty does not cover damage caused by accident, abuse, misuse or lightning strikes. Ripley's liability hereunder shall be limited to replacement or repair and shall not cover the cost of removal or installation of the unit, nor any consequential damages. Ripley Lighting Controls assumes no further liability with respect to the sale or use of this product. This warranty is in lieu of other warranties, expressed or implied, including the warranty of merchantability. Ripley Lighting Controls makes no warranty with respect to the suitability of the user's particular application. This warranty gives the user specific legal rights. Page 8 of 8 RESOLUTION NO. 10416(2012 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING MULTIPLE PROPERTIES TO THE CONTRIBUTING LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES AS PART OF AN AREA WIDE UPDATE TO THE HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY, CHC 48-11 WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee is performing an update to the Historic Resources Inventory as directed by the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan and the State Office of Historic Preservation; and WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee has identified that the properties listed in Exhibit A are eligible for listing on the City's Historic Resources Inventory based on adopted Architectural criteria within the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted public hearings in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on, June 27, 2011, July 25, 2011, August 22, 2011, October 24, 2011, November 28, 2011, December 19, 2011, February 27, 2012, March 26, 2012 and July 23, 2012, for the purpose of considering adding the above listed properties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on November 6, 2012 for the purpose of considering the CHC's recommended nominations to add the properties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicants, interested parties, the records of the Cultural Heritage Committee hearing, and "the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The Council makes the following findings of consistency with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Historic Preservation Ordinance: Findings: 1. The primary structures on the properties listed in Exhibit A are eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resources because they meet Historic Preservation Ordinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria — Style. The properties contain good examples of the Craftsman Bungalow, Neoclassic Rowhouse, and Railroad Vernacular style homes; these properties illustrate integrity; purity of style; and, effectively contribute to the historic character of their surroundings. R 10416 Resolution No. 10416 (2012 Series) Page 2 2. The properties are eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resources because they meet Historic Preservation Ordinance Historic Significance criteria for Architectural Criteria—Design. The structures exhibit notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of artistic merit, details and craftsmanship. 3. Historic listing is exempt from environmental review (CEQA Guidelines Section 15308 (Resource Protection). SECTION 2. Environmental Determination.. The City Council has determined that the action are exempt from environmental review as defined by Section 15308 of the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3. City Council hereby designates the properties listed in Exhibit A as contributing historic resources. Upon motion by Council Member Ashbaugh, seconded by Council Member Carter, and on the following roll call vote: AYES: Council Members Ashbaugh, Carpenter and Carter and Mayor Marx NOES: Vice Mayor Smith ABSENT: None The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 4t'day of December 2012. Mr or an Marx Mr ATTEST:. AL'i Mae e.Grim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: -1;z/ J hristine Dietrick City Attorney Historic Resource Survey Exhibit A Address APN Sub-area Listing Criteria 1.1291 SLAY 003-555-025 1 Architectural Significance 1135 ISLAY 003-555-007 1 Architectural Significance 1160 LEFF 003-555-020 1 Architectural Significance 1169 LEFF 003-556-017 1 Architectural Significance 1519 TORO 003-546-024 1 Architectural Significance 1153 ISLAY 003-555-009 1 Architectural Significance 1154 ISLAY 003-546-018 1 Architectural Significance 1159 ISLAY 003-555-019 1 Architectural Significance 1160 ISLAY 003-546-019 1 Architectural Significance 1170 ISLAY 003-546-020 1 Architectural Significance 1184 ISLAY 003-546-034 1 Architectural Significance 1203 BUCHON 002-452-011 2 Architectural Significance 1216 BUCHON 002-451-011 2 Architectural Significance 1227 BUCHON 002-452-003 2 Architectural Significance 1256 BUCHON 002-451-015 2 Architectural Significance 1262 BUCHON 002-451-016 2 Architectural Significance 1432 Toro 002-451-010 2 Architectural Significance 1424 Toro 002-451-017 2 Architectural Significance 1203 PISMO 002-451-001 2 Architectural Significance 1208 PISMO 002-341-003 2 Architectural Significance 1211 PISMO 002-451-002 2 Architectural Significance 1218 PISMO 002-341-014 2 Architectural Significance 1221 PISMO 002-451-003 2 Architectural Significance 1241 PISMO 002-451-005 2 Architectural Significance 1253 PISMO 002-451-006 2 Architectural Significance 1263 PISMO 002-451-007 2 Architectural Significance 1267 PISMO & 1405 JOHNSON 002-451-008 2 Architectural Significance 1424 TORO 002-451-017 2 Architectural Significance 1432 TORO 002-451-010 2 Architectural Significance 1362 PISMO 002-343-016 3 Architectural Significance 1335&.1.337_PISMO 002-454-004 3 Architectural Significance 1436 JOHNSON 002-454-008 3 Architectural Significance 1331 PACIFIC 002-343-035 4 Architectural Significance 1327 PACIFIC 002-343-004 4 Architectural Significance 1325 PACIFIC 002-343-003 4 Architectural Significance 1326 PACIFIC 002-342-011 4 Architectural Significance 1336& 1338 PACIFIC 002-342-012 4 Architectural Significance 1344 PACIFIC 002-342-025 4 Architectural Significance 1371 PACIFIC 002-343-025 4 Architectural Signficance 1318 JOHNSON 002-343-026 4 Architectural Significance 1339 MARSH 002-342-004 4 jArchitectural Significance Historic Resource Survey Exhibit A 1343 MARSH 002-342-005 4 Architectural Significance 1359 MARSH 002-342-006 4 Architectural Significance 1303 HIGUERA 002-334-020 5 Architectural Significance 1311 HIGUERA 002-334-002 5 Architectural Significance 1339 HIGUERA 002-334-004 5 Architectural Significance. 1361 HIGUERA 002-334-008 5 Architectural Significance 1368 HIGUERA 002-333-013 5 Architectural Significance 1302 MARSH 002-334-021 5 Architectural Significance 1310 MARSH 002-334-011 5 Architectural Significance 1320 MARSH 002-334-012 5 Architectural Significance 1350 MARSH 002-334-015 5 Architectural Significance 1356 MARSH 002-334-016 5 Architectural Significance 1360 MARSH 002-334-017 5 Architectural Significance