Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-04-2015 HRC Agenda Packet HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING February 4, 2015 5:00 p.m. Council Chambers 990 Palm Street “The Human Relations Commission (HRC) advises the Council in creating an environment within the City in which all persons can enjoy equal rights and opportunities regardless of race, religion, sex, national origin, age, physical, mental, sexual orientation, or economic status. The Commission makes recommendations to the Council or the City Manager on how these social concerns and human needs can best be addressed. It is desired and expected that specific functions of the HRC will change as solutions are found to specific problems or as times change, and the needs and priorities of the community in this field evolve.” CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Chairperson: Ron Tilley; Vice-Chairperson: Michelle Tasseff; Commissioners: Robert Clayton, Janet Pierucci, Gene Strohl, Maria Troy CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: December 3, 2014 Item 1. MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION AND NUISANCE ABATEMENT (TILLEY/HERMANN) Item 2. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE AND FORM 700 PROCESS (TILLEY/MEJIA) Item 3. REVIEW 2ND QUARTER 2014-2015 MAXINE LEWIS MEMORIAL SHELTER REPORT (TILLEY/MCINTOSH) Item 4. RELEASE 4TH QUARTER 2013-2014 MAXINE LEWIS MEMORIAL SHELTER FUNDING (TILLEY/MCINTOSH) PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS ITEMS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The general public is invited to speak before the Human Relations Commission on any subject within the jurisdiction of the Human Relations Commission that does not appear on this agenda. Although the Commission will not take action on any item presented during the Public Comment Period, the Chairperson may direct staff to place an item on a future agenda for formal discussion. Human Relations Commission Agenda Page 2 Item 5. SELECT SUBCOMMITTEE FOR 2015-2016 GIA APPLICATIONS (TILLEY) Item 6. REVIEW 4TH QUARTER 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) REPORT (TILLEY/COREY) COMMISSIONER COMMENTS ADJOURN Appeals: Administrative decisions by the Human Relations Commission may be appealed to the City Council in accordance with the appeal procedure set forth in Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including the disabled in all of its services, programs, and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410. Please speak to the Human Resources Department prior to the meeting if you require a hearing amplification device 781-7250. For more agenda information, call 781-7250 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION (HRC) MINUTES REGULAR MEETING December 3, 2014 5:00 p.m. 990 Palm St – Council Hearing Room CALL TO ORDER: 5:07 PM PRESENT: Chairperson: Ron Tilley; Vice-Chairperson: Michelle Tasseff; Commissioners: Robert Clayton*, Gene Strohl, Maria Troy *Commissioner Clayton arrived at 5:15 pm. ABSENT: Commissioner: Janet Pierucci STAFF PRESENT: Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager; Greg Zocher, Human Resources Manager CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: ACTION: Moved by Strohl/Tasseff to approve the minutes of October 1, 2014 and November 5, 2014 as submitted; motion carried 4:0 (Commissioner Clayton not yet present) ______________________________________________________________ PUBLIC COMMENT Bob Ellis thanked the City for the support provided. BUSINESS ITEMS Item 1. 2015 CDBG FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS (COREY) Housing Programs Manager Corey presented the CDBG funding recommendations. Commissioner Clayton arrived. Moved by Strohl/Troy to approve 2015 CDBG Funding Recommendations as presented; motion carried 5:0. Item 2. REVIEW 3rd QUARTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG) REPORT (COREY) Page 1 of 2 Housing Programs Manager Corey reviewed the 3rd Quarter Community Development Block Grant Report with Commissioners. Item 3. REVIEW 1ST QUARTER MAXINE LEWIS SHELTER REPORT (TILLEY/MCINTOSH) Commissioners reviewed 1st Quarter Maxine Lewis Shelter Report. Bob Ellis responded to questions from Commissioners. Item 4. RELEASE 3rd QUARTER 2014-2015 MAXINE LEWIS SHELTER FUNDS (TILLEY) Moved by Clayton/Strohl to release 3rd Quarter 2014-15 Maxine Lewis Shelter Funds; motion carried 5:0. Item 5. FINALIZE ADVISORY BODY GOALS (TILLEY) Moved by Clayton/Troy to approve the Advisory Body Goals as revised; motion carried 5:0. Item 6. CONSIDERATION OF CANCELING JANUARY 7, 2015 HRC MEETING (TILLEY) Moved by Clayton/Tasseff to cancel January 7, 2015 HRC Meeting; motion carried 5:0. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS There being no further business to come before the HRC, Chairperson Tilley adjourned the HRC meeting at 6:10 p.m. to the regular meeting scheduled for Wednesday, February 4, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at 990 Palm St. Respectfully Submitted, Greg Zocher, Human Resources Manager Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: February 4, 2015 Item Number: 1 2 HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Medical Marijuana Cultivation and Nuisance Abatement Study Session PROJECT ADDRESS: Citywide BY: Greg Hermann, Special Projects Manager Phone Number: 781-7194 e-mail: ghermann@slocity.org FROM: Kim Murry, Deputy Director Recommendation 1. Receive a presentation on enforcement tools and policy options to address potential nuisance conditions related to medical marijuana cultivation. 2. Provide feedback to staff regarding potential amendments to the Municipal Code. Background Medical marijuana cultivation, processing and distribution in California have become increasingly common since the adoption of Proposition 215, also known as the “Compassionate Use Act”, in 1996. Although cultivation processing, distribution and consumption of marijuana for qualified medicinal purposes is exempted from enforcement under certain state criminal statutes, recent court decisions have affirmed that cities retain full regulatory to prohibit and/or regulate medicinal marijuana related activities and land uses within their jurisdictional limits. Also, marijuana remains an illegal substance under the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. On September 3, 2013, the City began receiving complaints from community members that outdoor medical marijuana cultivation in a residential area was creating noxious odors and that the ongoing cultivation was creating health and safety concerns to adjacent neighbors and neighborhoods. In response to these concerns, the City Council directed staff to agendize regulatory options to address the issue. On May 6, 2014, the City Council held a public hearing to review a proposed ordinance1 to prohibit medical marijuana cultivation, processing and distribution in all areas of the City, with limited exceptions for qualified patients and primary caregivers. Specific provisions were included for cultivation by qualified patients and primary caregivers that included a prohibition on outdoor cultivation and limitations on the size of indoor cultivation. Council Direction After significant testimony from the public and deliberation by the City Council, the ordinance was not approved and staff was directed to focus only on enforcement tools to address the effects of medical marijuana cultivation when they reach the level of a nuisance. Much of the discussion by the City Council focused on the idea of adding provisions to the City’s Municipal Code that would permit the City to define and address potential nuisance effects of medical marijuana cultivation, such as odor, 1 May 6th, 2014 City Council Agenda Report: http://opengov.slocity.org/WebLink8/DocView.aspx?id=17291&dbid=1 Item 1 KM gh Medical Marijuana Cultivation and Nuisance Abatement Study Session (Citywide) Page 2 and to enforce against violations of such provisions via existing enforcement methods. There was no direction by the City Council to return with an ordinance to specifically regulate the method or scope of medical marijuana cultivation, so long as such cultivation does not result in adverse impacts to residents or neighborhoods. The City Council also directed that it was not interested in considering new or amended ordinance language related to medical marijuana dispensaries, beyond what is currently embodied in the City’s Municipal Code (i.e., dispensaries are not currently listed as an allowed use within the City and, therefore, are prohibited). Finally, the City Council asked that the issue be vetted through the appropriate advisory bodies. The Human Relations Commission (HRC) is the appropriate advisory body to review the issue and provide feedback for Council consideration. Since the initial complaint, the City has received numerous complaints regarding at least two additional locations of outdoor medical marijuana cultivation in residential neighborhoods. Each complaint has cited odor, in addition to other issues including safety and traffic impacts, as a significant source of the concern. Nuisance Determination Options for Medical Marijuana Cultivation There are a variety of approaches other cities have used to address issues related to medical marijuana. Many have developed separate chapters in their municipal codes with specific regulations pertaining to dispensaries, and indoor and outdoor cultivation. Given the focus of the City Council direction, this report will focus on specific elements of these ordinances related to mitigating and enforcing against nuisance conditions resulting from medical marijuana cultivation. One option available to the City is to identify all of the potential nuisance conditions that can result from the cultivation of medical marijuana and expressly define the creation or maintenance of those conditions as prohibited nuisances under the City’s Municipal Code. The City of Rancho Cordova has defined several types of medical marijuana cultivation related nuisances as a part of a broader, comprehensive ordinance addressing medical marijuana. Those nuisances are identified and defined as follows: “6.90.050 Public nuisance. It is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person owning, leasing, occupying, or having charge or possession of any parcel within the city of Rancho Cordova to create a public nuisance in the course of cultivating marijuana plants or any part thereof. A public nuisance may be deemed to exist if such activity produces: A. Odors which are disturbing to people of normal sensitivity residing or present on adjacent or nearby property or areas open to the public; B. Repeated responses (more than three times in a one-year time period) to the parcel from law enforcement officers; C. Repeated disruption (more than three times in a one-year time period) to the free passage of persons or vehicles in the neighborhood; D. Excessive noise in violation of applicable city noise standards in the general plan or Item 1 Medical Marijuana Cultivation and Nuisance Abatement Study Session (Citywide) Page 3 municipal code; E. Any other impacts on the neighborhood which are disruptive of normal activity in the area.”2 As previously noted, the majority of complaints received to date in San Luis Obispo regarding medical marijuana cultivation in the City have specified odor as one of the major offending factors, which is similar to what other jurisdictions are experiencing. Currently, the City has a variety of nuisances defined within the Municipal Code, but does not have any specific provisions for odor. As such, one policy option available is to add provisions to the Municipal Code defining pervasive odors impacting adjacent properties or residents related to medical marijuana cultivation as a prohibited nuisance condition. This has been the approach used by the City of Boulder, CO. Boulder also has a comprehensive ordinance for medical marijuana, which includes a more specific definition of a public nuisance related to odor and goes into greater detail regarding a threshold for initiating enforcement action related to the number of complaints from surrounding neighbors. Those provisions include: “5-10-6: Marijuana Odor Emissions. (a) No person, tenant, occupant, or property owner shall permit the emission of marijuana odor from any source to result in detectable odors that leave the premises upon which they originated and interfere with the reasonable and comfortable use and enjoyment of another's property. (b) Whether or not a marijuana odor emission interferes with the reasonable and comfortable use and enjoyment of a property shall be measured against the objective standards of a reasonable person of normal sensitivity. (c) A marijuana odor emission shall be deemed to interfere with the reasonable and comfortable use and enjoyment of property if the city manager receives three or more complaints concerning marijuana odor emanating from the same source from individuals representing separate households, rooming units, or places of business within the city.”3 Another option is to add a nuisance definition regarding odor to the City’s Municipal Code, but not limit it solely to the cultivation of medical marijuana. An example of this can be seen from the City of Riverside, CA. Riverside includes a provision on odor in the city’s nuisance abatement ordinance, but it is generally applied to all odors. That language includes: “Section 6.15.020: Declaration of nuisances: It is unlawful and is hereby declared a nuisance for any person owning, leasing, occupying or having charge or possession of any property and any vehicle thereon, in the City to maintain the property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are present: …(L) The existence of loud or unusual noises, or foul or noxious odors which offend 2 City of Rancho Cordova, CA Municipal Code: http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ranchocordova/ 3 City of Boulder, CO Municipal Code: https://www.municode.com/library/co/boulder/codes/municipal_code Item 1 Medical Marijuana Cultivation and Nuisance Abatement Study Session (Citywide) Page 4 the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and which interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property and affect the entire neighborhood of any considerable number of persons.”4 Enforcement Adding nuisance definitions and express prohibitions on the creation or maintenance of such conditions to the City’s Municipal Code to include issues that can result from medical marijuana cultivation will increase the City’s ability to take enforcement action on this issue when the activity generates an adverse impact in a neighborhood. Dependent on the definitions used and thresholds set for initiation of enforcement action to take place, the City would be able to use a variety of enforcement tools including issuing an administrative citation, which is subject to the City’s appeal procedures. HRC Role This study session is an opportunity for the HRC to provide input to City Council regarding proposed municipal code additions to address nuisances related to growing medical marijuana in the City of San Luis Obispo. The HRC’s role is to consider these policy options in light of public testimony and provide feedback to staff. Focus Questions for Commission Discussion Staff has provided several questions to facilitate HRC discussion of the issue in order to provide feedback for Council consideration: 1. Add nuisance definitions and prohibitions to the City’s Municipal Code to address potential odor issues related to cultivation of medical marijuana?  Yes No 2. Add nuisance definitions and prohibitions to the City’s Municipal Code to address other potential nuisance issues related to cultivation of medical marijuana?  Yes No 3. If “Yes” to question #2, identify other potential issues and describe nuisance factors associated with them. 4. Should the nuisance definitions and prohibitions added to the Municipal Code relate directly to the cultivation of medical marijuana?  Yes No The HRC’s recommendations will guide the development of any Municipal Code changes and be forwarded to the City Council with the staff report on this item. I:\Community Development\GHERMANN\Medical Marijuana\Medical Marijuana Nuisance Abatement Ordinance Amendment HRC Reprt.docx 4 City of Riverside, CA Abatement of Public Nuisances Ordinance: http://www.riversideca.gov/municode/pdf/06/6-15.pdf Item 1 CAPSLO Homeless Program Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter and Interfaith Coalition for the Homeless Shelter First Quarter Report October 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 Contract Period: July 1, 2014 – June 30, 2015 October During the month of October 2014, the shelter programs served an average of 83.8 persons per night; each person received one or more nights of shelter, for a monthly total of 2,597 shelter nights. The program also served 2,597 breakfasts and 2,985 dinners. • The ICH shelter host for October 2014 was United Church of Christ Congregations. The ICH bed total for the month of October was 1,104. • Children used 392 bed nights this month for an average of 12.6 children per night. In the month of October, 53 total persons in need were turned away for a shelter bed due to over- capacity, an average of 1.7 persons per night. 7 requests for shelter were turned away because they were screened out as ineligible for service. November During the month of November 2014, the shelter program served an average of 75.2 persons per night; each person received one or more nights of shelter, for a monthly total of 2,255. The program also served 2,255 breakfasts and 2,614 dinners. • The ICH shelter host for November 2014 was Congregation Beth David. The ICH bed total for the month of November was 780. • Children used 245 bed nights this month for an average of 8.2 children per night. In the month of November, 75 total persons in need were turned away for a shelter bed due to over-capacity, an average of 2.5 per night. Another 15 requests for shelter were turned away because they were screened out as ineligible for service. December During the month of December 2014, the shelter program served an average of 72.6 persons per night; each person received one or more nights of shelter, for a monthly total of 2,251. The program also served 2,251 breakfasts and 2,584 dinners. • The ICH shelter host for December 2014 was Grace Church. The ICH bed total for the month was 750. • Children used 201 bed nights this month for an average of 6.5 children per night. In the month of December, 55 total persons in need were turned away for a shelter bed due to over-capacity, an average of 1.8 per night. Another 15 requests for shelter were turned away because they were screened out as ineligible for service. ATTACHMENT - ITEM 3 Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County, Inc.Report Period:2nd Quarter FY 14-15 6.Gender Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 11.Family Type Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 a.Male 134 108 a.Single parent/female 6 8 b.Female 68 55 b.Single parent/male 1 0 202 163 0 0 c.Two-parent household 7 5 7.Age d.Single person 149 110 a.0-5 12 15 e.Two adults - no children 3 4 b.6-11 9 8 f.Other 0 0 c.12-17 5 4 166 127 0 0 d.18-23 14 13 12.Family Size Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 e.24-44 87 59 a.One 149 110 f.45-54 44 37 b.Two 7 9 g.55-69 29 24 c.Three 4 1 h.70+2 3 d.Four 5 4 *Total 202 163 0 0 e.Five 0 3 f.Six 1 0 I.Ethnicity g.Seven 0 0 a.Hispanic or Latino 49 40 h.Eight or more 0 0 b.Not Hispanic or Latino 153 123 ***Total 166 127 0 0 *Total 202 163 0 0 13.Source of Family Income II.Race a.Unduplicated # of Families a.White 164 125 Reporting One or More Sources b.African American 10 12 of Income***87 68 c.Native American and 6 6 b.Unduplicated # of Families 59 Alaskan Native Reporting No Income 79 0 d.Asian 1 0 Total UNDUP Families who responded e.Native Hawaiian 0 1 as either having a source of income 166 127 0 0 and Other Pacific Islander or having no income f.Native American/Alaskan 0 0 Income sources of families reporting income: Native & White c.TANF 11 4 g.Asian & White 0 0 d.SSI 28 19 h.Black/African American & White 0 0 e.Social Security 25 18 i.Nat. American/Alaskan Nat.&0 0 f.Pension 4 0 Black/African American:g.General Assistance 2 7 g.Multi-Race (any 2 or 21 19 h.Unemployment Insurance 1 1 more of the above)TOTAL:202 163 0 0 i.Employment + other source 2 1 j.Employment only 16 10 k.Social Security Disability 0 0 a.0-8 3 3 l Food Stamps*****0 0 b.9-12/non-graduate 33 22 m Child Support 0 0 c.High sch. Grad./GED 36 42 n Other 12 11 d.12+ some post secondary 64 43 14.Level of Family Income e.2 or 4 yr. College graduates 26 13 % of HHS guideline 162 123 0 0 a.Up to 30%ext. low income 78 72 7 Other Characteristics b.31% to 50%very low income 30 11 a.No health insurance 59 40 c.51% to 75%14 11 b.Developmentally Disabled:30 12 d.76% to 80%low income 17 10 c.Physically Disabled:37 28 e.81% to 100%10 7 d.Mentally Disabled 85 39 f.101% to 125%moderate 6 8 8 Shelter Days g.126% to 150%5 4 a.New 202 163 h.151% and over 6 4 b.Continuing 7,349 6,940 ***Total 166 127 0 0 9 Meals and service contacts 15.Housing Number of Families *** a.# of Breakfasts 7,551 7,103 a.Own 0 0 b.# of PM meals (inc. D & D)9,303 8,183 b.Rent 0 0 c.# of Diner/Dasher Meals 1,752 1,080 c.Homeless 166 127 d. # of Client Phone Calls d.Other 0 0 e. # of Bus Tokens Given Out ***Total 166 127 0 0 f.# of Warming Station Visits 16.Other family characteristics Number of Families*** a.Farmer 0 2 b.Migrant Farmworker 0 0 b.Seasonal Farmworker 3 0 c.Veteran 25 17 DEMOGRAPHICS ON INDIVIDUALS SERVED: *Total DEMOGRAPHICS ON HOUSEHOLDS SERVED: October 1, 2014 - December 31, 2014 Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter Quarterly Client Characteristics Report to the City of San Luis Obispo Human Relations Commission Number of Families *** 8. Ethnicity/Race Number of Families ***Total **Total 9.Education Level of Adults Number of Persons 24+** ATTACHMENT - ITEM 3 Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County, Inc. Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter 2014-2015 City of SLO $37,384 IDIS # Yes No Total Hispanic**Total Hispanic**Total Hispanic**Total Hispanic**Total Hispanic** 16 8 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 OK 8 OK 0 OK 0 OK 24 OK 8 Persons $29,450 or less $29,451 to $49,149 $49,150 to $78,560 $98,200 $86,300 7 Persons $27,700 or less $27,701 to $46,149 $46,150 to $73,800 $92,250 6 Persons $25,900 or less $25,901 to $43,199 $43,200 to $69,040 $74,400 5 Persons $24,100 or less $24,101 to $40,199 $40,200 to $64,280 $80,350 4 Persons $22,300 or less $22,301 to $37,199 $37,200 to $59,020 $59,500 3 Persons $20,100 or less $20,101 to $33,499 $33,500 to $53,560 $66,950 2 Persons $17,850 or less $17,851 to $29,799 $29,800 to $47,600 1 Person $15,650 or less $15,651 to $26,049 $26,050 to $41,680 $52,100 To determine a client's income level, first find the number of persons in client's family in lefthand column below, then cross to the right to find the column in which the total family income falls.(A =Extremely Low, B = Low, or C = Moderate) (Levels are a percentage of Median Income.) HOUSEHOLD SIZE A - Extremely Low B - Low C - Moderate County Median TOTAL (should equal RACE total)16 8 0 0 0 0 24 C. Moderate Income 0 D. Non - Low/Moderate Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 B. Low Income 0 0 0 A. Extremely Low Income 16 8 0 * "Hispanic" is not considered to be a race, but rather an "ethnicity". People may be White and Hispanic, Black and Hispanic, etc. ** Please identify the number of Hispanic clients out of the total. E.g., If there are a total of 100 White clients and 20 were also Hispanic, enter "100" under "total" and "20" under "Hispanic". Questions? Call Tony Navarro at (805) 781-5787. INCOME (see chart pg 2)1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Year-to-Date Year-to-Date American Indian/Alaska Native Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander Black/African American Asian RACE * White Faith based organization?Total 1st Quarter Total 2nd Quarter Funding Spent TOTAL (should equal INCOME total) American Indian/Alaska Native and White Amer Indian/Alaska Native and Black/African American Black/African American and White Asian and White Other Multi-Racial Total 3rd Quarter Total 4th Quarter CDBG BENEFICIARY REPORT FORM FY 2014-2015 REPORTING YEAR QUARTERLY REPORT PERIOD: October 1, 2014 - December 31, 2014 Organization Program Name Action Plan Year Jurisdiction ATTACHMENT - ITEM 3 COMPLETE IN FOURTH QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR REPORT ONLY Cash Match State Local Government Private Sources: ACCOMPLISHMENTS TOTAL $0.00 2 Please provide accomplishment narrative for the CDBG funds expended during the fiscal year. Contact Tony Navarro at tnavarro@co.slo.ca.us or (805) 781-5787 for more information 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 Other Funds: Identify funding source(s) and amounts. Use additional sheets if needed.AMOUNT ATTACHMENT - ITEM 3 January 21, 2015 Tony Navarro, Planner III Department of Planning and Building County of San Luis Obispo County Government Center San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Subject: Quarterly CDBG Reports for 2011 - 2014 Program Years. Tony: Attached is the quarterly report for the period from October 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014, for the City’s active CDBG program years, per our cooperative agreement with the County of San Luis Obispo. If you have questions, please call me at 781-7169. Sincerely, Tyler Corey, Housing Programs Manager cc: Vilma Warner, Senior Accountant Kim Murry, Deputy Director of Community Development Human Relations Commission Members Attachment: Quarterly Report ATTACHMENT - ITEM 6 2011 CDBG Program Year Quarterly Report For the period from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 1. Subrecipient and Address:2. Contact person:4. Report Period:County of San Luis Obispo: Tyler Corey 10/1/14 -12/31/14 City of San Luis Obispo 6: Date request phoned in 990 Palm Street 3. Phone number:5. Date submitted:N/A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 (805) 781-7175 1/23/15 7. Date funds released: N/A Project (a)Budget (b)Expenses ©Expenses (d)Funds (e)Prior (f)Curent (g)Balance (h) this period to date receivedrequestsrequest available to date not received (b-d) SLO Homeless Shelter by CAPSLO 85,254 85,254 85,254 - Property Acquisition - 313 South Street 133,228 133,228 133,228 - Property Acquisition - 3212 Rockview 211,217 211,217 211,217 - Homeless Campus Design/Drawing by CAPSLO 25,000 25,000 Administration - housing program 68,203 68,203 68,203 - Administration - other staff support 45,468 45,468 45,468 - - - - - - 568,370 - 543,370 543,370 - - 25,000 Narrative-Status of Approved Activities There is one active project remaining for the 2011 Program Year. The Homeless Services Center design and drawing project by CAPSLO is expected to start during the next quarter. Land use entitlements for a Use Permit and Architectural Review have been approved for the project. A building permit application for project construction is anticipated to be submitted for City review in March 2015. ATTACHMENT - ITEM 6 2012 CDBG Program Year Quarterly Report For the period from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 1. Subrecipient and Address:2. Contact person:4. Report Period:County of San Luis Obispo: Tyler Corey 10/1/14 -12/31/14 City of San Luis Obispo 6: Date request phoned in 990 Palm Street 3. Phone number:5. Date submitted:N/A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 (805) 781-7175 1/23/15 7. Date funds released: N/A Project (a)Budget (b)Expenses ©Expenses (d)Funds (e)Prior (f)Current (g)Balance (h) this period to date receivedrequestsrequest available to date not received (b-d) SLO Homeless Shelter by CAPSLO 75,988 - 75,988 75,988 - Property Acquisition - 542 Hathway 95,000 95,000 95,000 - Property Acquisition - 3212 Rockview 30,000 30,000 30,000 - - Property Acquisition - 313 South Street 39,282 39,282 39,282 - ADA Curb Ramps (1)105,000 96,079 96,079 - Homeless Campus Design/Drawing by CAPSLO 50,000 50,000 Women's Business Center 10,000 10,000 10,000 - Administration - housing program 60,787 - 60,787 60,787 - Administration - other staff support 40,531 - 40,531 40,531 - - - - 506,588 - 447,667 447,667 - - 50,000 (1) Reallocation of funds approved by the City Manager on 3/14/14 from 2012 ADA Curb Ramps to 2014 ADA Curb Ramps in the amount of $8,921 Narrative-Status of Approved Activities There is one active project remaining for the 2011 Program Year. The Homeless Services Center design and drawing project by CAPSLO is expected to start during the next quarter. Land use entitlements for a Use Permit and Architectural Review have been approved for the project. A building permit application for project construction is anticipated to be submitted for City review in March 2015. ATTACHMENT - ITEM 6 2013 CDBG Program Year Quarterly Report For the period from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 1. Subrecipient and Address:2. Contact person:4. Report Period:County of San Luis Obispo: Tyler Corey 10/1/14 -12/31/14 City of San Luis Obispo 6: Date request phoned in 990 Palm Street 3. Phone number:5. Date submitted:N/A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 (805) 781-7175 1/23/15 7. Date funds released: N/A Project (a)Budget (b)Expenses ©Expenses (d)Funds (e)Prior (f)Current (g)Balance (h) this period to date receivedrequestsrequest available to date not received (b-d) SLO Homeless Shelter by CAPSLO 76,613 76,613 76,613 - - Property Acquisition - 313 South Street 166,992 400 165,292 164,492 400 1,700 ADA Curb Ramps 105,000 - 105,000 105,000 - Homeless Campus Design/Drawing by CAPSLO 50,000 50,000 Women's Business Center 10,000 10,000 Administration - housing program 53,170 - 53,170 53,170 - - Administration - other staff support 48,981 48,981 48,981 - - - - 510,756 400 449,056 448,256 400 - 61,700 Narrative-Status of Approved Activities The NEPA environmental clearance and CDBG contract are complete for the Women’s Business Center Program. Funds are expected to be drawn down during the next quarter. The Homeless Services Center design and drawing project by CAPSLO is expected to start during the next quarter. Land use entitlements for a Use Permit and Architectural Review have been approved for the project. A building permit application for project construction is anticipated to be submitted for City review in March 2015. ATTACHMENT - ITEM 6 2014 CDBG Program Year Quarterly Report For the period from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 1. Subrecipient and Address:2. Contact person:4. Report Period:County of San Luis Obispo: Tyler Corey 10/1/14 -12/31/14 City of San Luis Obispo 6: Date request phoned in 990 Palm Street 3. Phone number:5. Date submitted:N/A San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3249 (805) 781-7175 1/23/15 7. Date funds released: N/A Project (a)Budget (b)Expenses ©Expenses (d)Funds (e)Prior (f)Current (g)Balance (h) this period to date receivedrequestsrequest available to date not received (b-d) SLO Homeless Shelter by CAPSLO 74,767 30,192 60,384 - 14,383 Alano Club Transitional Housing Rehabilitation 139,898 - 139,898 City of SLO ADA Curb Ramps (1)161,813 - - 161,813 Women's Shelter Plumbing Rehabilitaion 31,200 31,200 Administration - housing program 59,813 19,881 37,141 - 22,672 Administration - other staff support 39,876 13,254 24,810 15,066 - - - 507,367 63,327 122,335 - - - 385,032 (1) Reallocation of funds approved by the City Manager on 3/14/14 from 2012 ADA Curb Ramps to 2014 ADA Curb Ramps in the amount of $8,921 Narrative-Status of Approved Activities The NEPA environmental clearances for the Alano Club Transitional Housing Rehabilitation, City of SLO ADA Curb Ramps and Women’s Shelter Plumbing Rehabilitation projects are complete. The CDBG contract for the Women’s Shelter Plumbing Rehabilitation project has been executed. Funds are expected to be drawn down on these projects during the next quarter. Costs were incurred for CAPSLO’s Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter, CDBG program administration and Housing Element implementation during the quarter. ATTACHMENT - ITEM 6