The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-09-2012 MTC Agenda Packet CA Ch RO Ch Vi Co Sta ALL TO O hair calls th OLL CAL hair: ce-Chair: ommittee M aff: M ORDER he meeting LL OF CO Elizabeth T Stanley Yu Members: Jody Frey Susan Ra Jean Long Stanley Y Elizabeth John Webs Dee Lawso A CI MASS TR W to order. OMMITTE Thyne ucikas y ains g Yucikas h Thyne ster, Sr., Tr on, Transp AGE REGULA ITY OF S RANSPO 99 Council 2: Wednesday EE MEMB (Disabled (Cal Poly (Student (Business (Senior) ransit Man ortation As END AR MEET SAN LUI ORTATIO 0 Palm Str Hearing R :45 p.m. y, MAY 0 BERS AND d) Todd y) Art A t) Louis s) Jonath ager ssistant DA TING IS OBISP ON COM reet Room 09, 2012 D STAFF d Katz Apruzzese se Justice than Ellis PO MMITTEE (Member at (Techni (Altern (Altern E t Large)* ical) nate) nate) 1 MAY 09, 2012 Regular meeting MTC agenda Page 2 of 3 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS: City clerk staff will administer the oath of office to newly appointed MTC members. PUBLIC COMMENTS 10 min. At this time, members of the public may address the Committee on items not on the agenda, not to exceed three minutes per person. Items raised are generally referred to the staff and, if action by the Committee is necessary, may be scheduled for a future meeting. The Chair will provide the opportunity for the public to address items on the agenda. A. CONSENT ITEMS Consent Items can be approved by a single vote by the Committee. Any member of the Committee can pull and discuss any individual consent item. A-1 Approval of minutes from March 14, 2012 5 min B. DISCUSSION ITEMS B-1 Ad Hoc Committee marketing verbal status update 5 min C. ACTION ITEMS C-1 Review and Approve meeting schedule for FY 2012 5 min C-2 Nomination-Election of Officers for FY 2013 15 min D. INFORMATION ITEMS D-1 Transit Manager’s Report 15 min (Includes Presentation by Fred Munroe for Transit training grant update) D-2 Operating - Performance Reports (Attachment “A”) 15 min Service Complaints: Complaints regarding bus service or routes are to be directed to the Transportation Assistant at 781-7531. Reports of complaints/commendations are available to the public upon request. 2 MAY 09, 2012 Regular meeting MTC agenda Page 3 of 3 3 MEMBER’S COMMENTS 15 min NEXT MEETING DATE/LOCATION (*proposed) July 11, 2012 2:45 pm-4:45 pm, *SLORTA CONFERENCE ROOM NOON-2:45 PM SLO TRANSIT/SLORTA FACILITY TOUR PRIOR TO MEETING ADJOURNMENT G:\Transportation-Data\_Unsorted Stuff\Transportation\Transportation Committees\MTC Committee\FY 2012\MAY 9-2012\1-Draft MTC Agenda,REGULAR MEETING MAY 09-2012.docx 3 Item: DATE TO: FROM: SUBJE RECOM Appr G:\Transporta A-1 REG ME A-1 May Mass John ECT: APPR MMENDA rove Marc ation-Data\_Unsor EETING MAY-9-2 P 9, 2012 s Transport Webster, T ROVE DR ATION: h 14, 2012 rted Stuff\Transpo 2012- APPROVE Page 1 of 1 R tation Com Transit Ma RAFT RE 2 Regular m ortation\Transporta MINUTES COVE Regular meet mmittee anager GULAR M meeting mi ation Committees\M ER SHEET.docx ting May 9, 2 MEETING inutes. MTC Committee\ 012 MTC Ag G MINUT \FY 2012\MAY 9- genda item A- TES -2012\2-AGENDA -1 1 A ITEM 4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE COUNCIL HEARING ROOM WEDNESDAY, MARCH 14, 2012 DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Elizabeth Thyne called the meeting to order at 2:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Elizabeth Thyne, Susan Rains, Art Apruzzese, Louise Justice, Jonathan Ellis, Jean Long, Jody Frey, Stanley Yucikas and Todd Katz Staff: John Webster Dee Lawson ANNOUNCEMENTS John Webster introduced Geoff Straw, new San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (SLORTA) Executive Director, and he briefly discussed his service background. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. A. CONSENT ITEMS A-1. Approval of January 11, 2012 Regular Meeting Mr. Yucikas moved to approve the January 11, 2012 meeting minutes as submitted. Mr. Apruzzese seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. B. DISCUSSION ITEMS B-1. Ad Hoc Committee Marketing Update The various student presentations were posted in the Council hearing Room and available for review before and during the MTC meeting. Mr. Apruzzese discussed the marketing committee update, noting that ridership had increased due to the high cost of fuel. He MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 5 stated the marketing efforts were targeted towards the discretionary rider and discussed several Cal Poly student contest entries for marketing campaigns. The Committee discussed the various entries and the results and member comments are as follows: II CENTS DESIGN Elizabeth Garrell (Art Director) Tyler Hays Kyle (Designer) Comments: • Liked the concepts & situations • Good potential for use in an actual campaign • Differing opinion whether some shots were too dark • Good use as magnets (Pictures and message) THE AGENCY Josiah Pak Nicole Choy Comments: • Liked the concepts (especially the green and work messages) • Bike message for extra fare hard to make transit connection-need to revise • Liked bar code/scan • Liked the 1-2-3 insert-Good potential handouts/bookmarks farmers market • Fonts size and message will need possible revisions • Needs bilingual translation SUGARCOATED Jo Watkins Comments: • Liked child’s play concept • Questions regarding Leggos and Play Dough copyright issues • Eye catching • Easy to animate for videos • Good potential for actual campaign • Liked “I Bus SLO” for tee shirts and shelter graphic use STUDIO 67 Jenna Pile Karyn Savory Tyler Benham MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 6 Comments: • Need some positive messages (too many negative-NO Change, More Dings etc) • Liked the designs (especially another ticket and gas pains) • Good potential for actual campaign • Possible use at bus stop Kiosks KBP Kelly Baillon Brittany Padon Comments: • Liked the pictures and message tag lines • Billboard use not allowed in SLO • Good potential for actual campaign • Liked General image concept After final comments and review the nine MTC members were asked to vote on the class designs and the results were as follows: 1ST PLACE-THE AGENCY-Received five votes 2ND PLACE-SUGARCOATED-Received three votes 3RD PLACE-STUDIO 67-Received one vote John Webster and Dee Lawson will attend the Cal Poly class on March 15th to announce the winning design. Chairperson Elizabeth asked if the Ad Hoc members wished to remain active to work with the student on developing the concepts towards a final product and they agreed. Committee consists of Art Apruzzese, Jean Long, & Jonathan Ellis with Susan Rains as Cal Poly representative. Dee Lawson will coordinate future meeting with students and MTC members. C. ACTION ITEMS C-1. SLOCOG Presentation – DTC Study Evaluation of Alternatives Eliane Guillot Wilson discussed the background of the coordinated Downtown Transit Center Study and the several alternatives in project implementation on various streets, the evaluation criteria, costs, and the potential funding sources. There was general Committee clarification and discussion on the various alternatives. Mr. Apruzzese asked about the anticipated project completion date and Ms. Wilson indicated that environmental studies (EIR) would take 8-12 months with acquisition of right of way and finally 8-12 months of construction. Most likely this would take about five years to complete once agreement was reached on a design option. There was a MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 7 discussion regarding environmental issues and soil cleanup with Ms. Wilson indicating that this would be a property owner responsibility. There were discussions regarding various possible parking and retail options and Ms. Wilson indicated they were not part of the various alternatives under consideration. There was a discussion regarding the various options and pros & cons for alternate #5. Mr. Yucikas felt that the Higuera St. Alternative #6 was the best choice at this point. Jody Frey indicated that accessibility issues needed to be in place for access from the current DTC at City Hall and any new sites and that perhaps a shuttle should be included. Bobby Babaeian, owner of Tri Counties Transit/SLO Yellow Cab Company, asked to be involved with plans so he could coordinate his taxi services with the Transit Center as well as a general discussion regarding the problems associated with the existing taxi stops in the Downtown business areas. Dan Ross, Surf Cab Company, felt that the Greyhound hub should be part of the DTC plans. Mr. Straw noted that Greyhound also had a package business as part of their operation and needed space to facilitate. Councilman John Ashbaugh, had questions regarding any Environmental Impact Report (EIR) funding and Ms. Wilson indicated that Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5309 funding might be available if sufficient local support was in place. The Committee thanked Ms. Wilson for her presentation and she stated that additional comments could be made directly to her or to John Webster who would pass them along to her. The MTC Committee overall comments were very positive in nature and supportive of the project going to the next phase for EIR study if funding was available. Recommendation: Accept presentation and provide member feedback did not require a vote by the members. C-2. DTC Safety-Security Issues John Webster provided a brief history regarding the on-going safety and security issues at the Downtown Transit Center (DTC) these problems have included issues such as excessive loitering, alcohol, smoking, and fighting occurring within the shelter. Mr Webster stated that Public Works Transportation staff met with the SLO Police Department staff, SLO Parking and Administrative Department staff and the Downtown Association (DA) Executive Director to discuss possible actions to address these issues. After discussion, the DA offered to expand their current security patrols to include the DTC and the Parking Services Division also offered to expand their security patrols from the 919 Parking garage to provide coverage on Thursday-Sunday from 3 pm-11 pm. SLO PD offered to provide additional patrols in an effort to be more visible and hopefully deter and eliminate the ongoing issues. MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 8 As a result of these efforts there is a marked reduction in the level of complaints being received and the increased security appears to be having an impact and staff recommended that the MTC consider the following: 1. If funding is available would the MTC support permanent security patrols during all hours of transit service at the DTC? 2. Would the MTC support the installation of security equipment such as cameras and increased lighting at the DTC and other high use bus stops? 3. Would the MTC support the relocation of the existing electrical outlet currently located between the two shelters closest to Osos and Mill Street? Mr. Yucikas discussed the no smoking ordinance and the possibility of putting brochures on the bus schedule racks. Other members discussed various health and safety concerns with Jody Frey indicating that she felt there was not enough Police Department staff available to patrol the DTC and downtown areas. There were member concerns regarding the location of the electrical outlet and whether this was contributing to non-transit users monopolizing the shelters closest to Mill Street and members were favorable to permanent safety patrols if the funding was available and did not reduce transit service levels. Jean Long and Jonathan Ellis had initial reservations regarding safety cameras ability to prevent crime but were open to the concept. Mr. Webster stated that the on-board bus cameras had been successful on a number of occasions with identification of passengers who had taken a lost wallet or pocketbook and not turned it in to the bus driver as a lost and found item. He stated that when the video was reviewed by the police department they were eventually able to recover the lost items. Mr. Yucikas indicated he was favorable to cameras and additional lighting being installed. Mr. Webster indicated that the City already had a camera policy and this recommendation (#2) would need to be approved by the City manager. Mr. Yucikas moved to recommend items #1 & #2 Mr. Apruzzese seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. There was further discussion regarding item #3 as well as health and safety issues for transit passengers in proximity to those using the electrical outlets to recharge ankle tracking monitors. MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 9 Todd Katz moved to recommend item #3 and that the Council consider relocating this outlet to another area. Elizabeth Thyne seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. C-3. Permanent Taxi Rate Increase Mr. Webster discussed the draft staff report to be submitted to Council and recommended the MTC support the permanent rate increase, which was based on the high cost of gasoline. The representatives from area taxi companies stated their companies were privately operated, did not receive any State funding and noted that gas is now higher than when the draft report was created. They agreed with the permanent rate increase request and also discussed problems with the lag time involved with getting a new rate approved. Mr. Webster indicated that this would need to be changed in the actual municipal code and that meetings had been held with the taxi operators to discuss possible revisions. Mr. Katz suggested the fleets purchase more cost-effective vehicles. Mr. Apruzzese moved to recommend that Council approve the taxi rate increase as outlined in the staff report. Ms. Rains seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. D. INFORMATION ITEMS D-1. Transit Manager’s Report D-2. Operating-Performance Reports Mr. Webster presented a summary of the transit manager’s report and stated that ridership was up approximately 8.5% from July 1, 2011 thru February 2012 and this increase was the highest rate he has seen in the last five years. Unfortunately he also indicated that fuel costs were also very high but within budget at least thru the end of January 2012. Mr. Webster indicated that Gillig has notified the City that they will begin construction of a new 40’ transit vehicle on April 25, 2012 with delivery expected by the middle of May. He also noted that purchase orders have been issued to replace the remaining two-1997 vehicles. MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 10 Dee Lawson city Transportation Assistant, provided an update of the upcoming SLO Marathon set for April 22nd. She provided handouts and maps indicating the probable impacts on existing transit routes and anticipated delays. Members were encouraged to contact Ms. Lawson if they needed any additional information. Mr. Straw from SLORTA indicated that SLOCOG has projected a 9.3% increase in the State sales tax which would provide additional funding for local transit operations. MEMBER COMMENTS Mr. Apruzzese recommended that a tour of the Transit facility be offered and Mr. Webster suggested that perhaps a joint tour of SLO Transit/Prado facility in the morning followed by a tour of the SLORTA facility on Cross Street in afternoon would be beneficial. Members were favorable to this concept and Mr. Webster would try and set something up for next month and send some dates/times for schedule coordination to the members. Mr. Yucikas indicated that he would be in favor of evaluating if American flags could be installed on both sides of the buses for use during holidays such as Memorial Day, July 4th and Veterans Day. All members seemed favorable to this concept and Mr. Webster indicated that this was done at a number of transit locations where he was a manager and would bring cost information back to the members in May as an action agenda item. The meeting adjourned at 5:20 pm to the regular meeting May 9, 2012 at 2:45 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Woske, Recording Secretary MTC agenda item A-1 May 9, 2012 regular meeting 11 Regular m Item C1 G:\Transporta regular-MTC Date: Item: TO: FROM: SUBJEC DISCU RECOM Approv FY 201 DISCU Attache update o Wednes 2:45 p.m Attachm meeting MT ation-Data\_Unsor Agenda item C-1 May C-1 Mass John CT: MTC USSION MMENDA ve the meet 2-2013 USSION ed is the pr of the FY 2 sday of odd m. to 4:45 ment 1: Pr TC agenda M rted Stuff\Transpo - cover sheet-MTC 09, 2012 s Transport Webster C MEETIN ATIONS ting schedu oposed me 2011/2012 d numbere p.m. oposed Me May 09-2012 ortation\Transporta C MEETING SCH tation Com NG SCHED ule of the M eeting sche 2 schedule. ed months ( eeting Sche ation Committees HEDULE FOR FY mmittee DULE FOR Mass Trans edule. The Tradition (i.e. July, S edules s\MTC Committe Y2013.docx R FY 2013 sportation e meeting s nally, MTC September ee\FY 2012\MAY Committe schedule re C meets on r, Novembe Y 9-2012\3-May 0 e for epresents a the second er, etc.) fro 09-2012 an d om 12 AGENDA ITEM C-1 MTC REGULAR MEETING MAY 9, 2012 Page 1 G:\Transportation-Data\_Unsorted Stuff\Transportation\Transportation Committees\MTC Committee\FY 2012\MAY 9-2012\3-C-1-Meeting Schedule FY 2013-ATTACHMENT.doc FY 2012/2013 REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULE OF THE MASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE DATE TIMES PLACE July 11, 2012 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo September 12, 2012 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo November 14, 2012 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo January 09, 2013 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo March 13, 2013 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo May 08, 20131 * 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo July 10, 2013 2:45 P.M. to 4:45 P.M. City Hall Council Hearing Room 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo Note: This schedule does not include Special Meetings. 1 Election of Chair and Vice Chair for next fiscal year * Set First meeting for FY 2013-14. 13 Regular m Item C2 Date: Item: TO: FROM: SUBJEC DISCU Nomina Under th ARTICL A. T at The Byla FY office G:\Transporta MTC Agenda meeting MT May C-2 Mass John CT: ELEC USSION ate and El e current MT LE 6. OFFI The officers t the Comm aw recomme ers to be elec ation-Data\_Unsor a item C-2- cover s TC agenda M 09, 2012 s Transport Webster CTION OF lect MTC TC by-laws ICERS will consist mittee meetin endations th cted at the M rted Stuff\Transpo sheet-election of M May 09-2012 tation Com F MTC CH Chair and (see below) t of a Chair ng in June f at were app May meeting ortation\Transporta MTC Officers.docx mmittee HAIRPERS d Vice Cha person and for one year roved by th g. ation Committees\ x SON/VICE air for FY d Vice-Chair r terms. he Council in \MTC Committee E CHAIRP Y 2013 rperson wh n June 2011 e\FY 2012\MAY PERSON ho will be ele specify the 9-2012\5-MAY 0 ected e next 09-2012- 14 15 16 17 18 19 I T F D S May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana Item: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT The Tra March-A Ridersh Transit On Tue informa meeting availabl New F Develop our exi January will pro perform SLO Tr On Apr for bulk discoun Backgr On Octo Since th various current 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA D-1 Mass Tr John We May 09, : Transit M ansit Mana April 2012 hip and pe t Service S esday, Ma ation on T g starting a le on the C Freedom pment) and sting trans y 31, 2012 ovide a sh mance. ransit Bul ril 17, 2012 k pass pur nts. round ober 10, 20 hat date, S agencies SLO Tran agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx ransportatio ebster, Sr., , 2012 Manager’s ager’s Repo 2. erformanc Study Sess ay 8, 2012 Transit serv at 7 pm. M Council age Grant A d SLOCOG sit travel t and the ne hort presen lk Pass Dis 2 Council a rchases of 010, the C SLO Trans such as th nsit fare re m D-1 ortation\Transporta on Commi Transit M Report ort will inc ce reports sion 2 the San vice in the MTC memb enda websi pplication G staff to s raining pr ext two yea ntation on scount approved a f fifty (50 ity Counci sit staff ha he YMCA esolution d ation Committees\ ittee Manager clude highl (D-2 Atta Luis Obi e City of bers are en ite and pro n: Staff w submit a n oject. The ar cycle sta the curre a staff reco ) or more il last appr as received A, local sc did not allo \MTC Committee\ lights of iss achment “A ispo Coun San Luis ncouraged t ovided with worked w new applic e first two arted on Fe ent status o ommendati e with the roved mod d requests chools and ow for a b \FY 2012\MAY 9 sues and ri A”) ncil will r Obispo at to attend a h this agen with Fred ation for c year cycl ebruary 1st of training ion to esta exception difications t s for bulk d other no bulk purch 9-2012\5-AGENDA idership da receive a t the regul and the sta da package Munroe continued f le was com t, 2012. Fr g and the ablish a 15% n of Senio to SLO Tr pass disco n-profit gr hase discou A ITEM D-1 MTC ata from report and lar Counci aff report is e. (Ridership funding fo mpleted on red Munroe first cycle % discoun or-Disabled ransit fares ounts from roups. The unt beyond C 1 d l s p r n e e nt d s. m e d 20 May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana what is contacte that SL is curren On Mar Obispo Down e Transit for a gr with thi City sta agencie discoun (15%) d Transit purchas Vehicle vehicles factory one 40 remaini 2013. Other C Curren June 30 expende • D The Bu equipm complet 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA s available ed the San ORTA als ntly availa rch 28, 20 Co., Inc. ( event on M single ride rant that w is event. aff had ana s. Given nt from oth discount be system. Th ses a minim e replacem s that are b on April 3 ’ replacem ng replace Capital Pr nt Transit 0, 2012 af ed. Driver brea us Radio R ent has b ted on Apr agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx e for senio Luis Obis o does not able to the g 12 a reque (CAPSLO May 24, 201 e passes w would provi alyzed this the natur her transit p e authorize his discoun mum of 50 ment updat beyond the 30, 2012 to ment vehi ement vehi rojects: Facility p fter the fol ak-room ca Replacem been fully ril 13, 201 m D-1 ortation\Transporta ors and d spo Region t currently general pu est was ma ) for trans 12. CAPSL where none ide up to $ request, a re of this providers s ed for bulk nt will now SLO Tran tes: The C eir 12 year o inspect th cle. Deliv icles have b project (FT llowing pr abinets and ment proje y installed 13. Staff is ation Committees\ disabled pa nal Transit provide a ublic. ade by Com sit pass dis LO has req e is current $500 for S and similar request, a such as SL k purchases w be availa nsit passes. City is in th useful life he construc very is an been order TA 5307) roject has d counters ect (CAL-E d and co s in the pro \MTC Committee\ assengers Authority any bulk pu mmunity A scounts to quested a b tly availab LO Transi r bulk purc and the un LORTA, st s of fifty (5 able to CA he process e. City staf ction progr nticipated red and de Staff is an been com EMA fund ommunicat ocess of re \FY 2012\MAY 9 on a sing y (SLORTA urchase di Action Par be used at bulk purch ble. CAPS it pass pur chase requ navailabili taff recomm 50) or mor APSLO and s of replaci ff made a s ress that st in Mid-M elivery is a nticipating mpleted and ded $209,0 tion site eviewing th 9-2012\5-AGENDA gle pass b A) and they scounts be rtnership o t the Veter hase discou SLO has al rchases in uests from ity of bulk mended th re passes fo d any futur ing three 1 site visit to tarted on A May 2012. anticipated closing th d the fund 000).Bus a improvem he final in A ITEM D-1 MTC 2 basis. Staf y indicated eyond wha of San Luis rans Stand unt for SLO lso applied connection other loca k purchase hat a fifteen for the SLO re user who 1997 mode o the Gillig April 25 fo . The two by June o his grant by ds are fully and facility ments were nvoices and C 2 ff d at s - O d n al e n O o l g r o f y y y e d 21 May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana determi purchas Transit improve is await Bus Sto received lighting and ha improve the total New B Transit install s include wireless Board o move fo The Do A prese positive their Bo environ availabl FTA Fu On Janu the Fed Year (F provide apportio to be at (POP) a 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA ning if th ses such as t Facility ements to t ting the sal op Improv d for impr g etc. Staff as identifie ements. A l cost is es us Stop S system ha solar lighti the insta s video mo on April 4 orward. owntown T entation w e comment oard in Jun nmental re le at the SL unding up uary 11, 20 deral Regis FY) 2012 es contract onments ar or slightly approved b agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx here will extra hand project (C the existin le of State vement pr rovements f is in the ed the D pilot cam timated no Safety and as approxim ng inside allation of onitoring s 4, 2012. Th Transit Ce was provid ts from Co ne 2012. T view if f LOCOG w pdate 012 the Fed ster announ contract authority re expected y less than by Counci m D-1 ortation\Transporta be any f dheld units CAL-EMA ng SLO Tra bonds befo oject (PTM s to existin process o DTC as o era project ot to exceed d Security mately for some shelt f electroni systems at his project enter Stud ded to SLO ouncil whi The Higue funding is website at w deral Tran ncing parti authority. for the per d before th FY 2011 il on Febru ation Committees\ funds rema s. A funded $ ansit facilit ore it can m MISEA-Pro ng bus sto f evaluatin one locatio t has been d $6,000. y Project rty-nine (4 ters or on c Automa selected s t is awaitin dy O Council ich will be ra Street A available www.sloco sit Admini ial apporti . The cur riod Octob he fiscal ye levels as o uary 21, 2 \MTC Committee\ aining for $48,000) w ty located move forw op 1B fund ops includ ng bus stop on for re n submitted (CAL-EM 49) bus she existing si atic Vehic stops and w ng the sal l on April e provided Alternative e. More in gtransit.co istration (F onment fo rrent autho ber 1, 201 ear ends on outlined in 012. A rev \FY 2012\MAY 9 r addition will include at 29 Prad ward. ded $25,68 ding shelte ps for pro epainting d as a City MA funded elters. This ign poles. cle Locato was approv le of State l 17, 2012 d to SLOC e #6 was c nformation om FTA) poste or program orization 1 through n June 30, the recent vised POP 9-2012\5-AGENDA al minor e safety an do Road. T 89) Fundin ers, bench oposed imp and other y manager d $32,140) s project p The projec or (AVL) ved by the e bonds be 2 and rec COG and r chosen to n on this ed their fir ms funded w of FTA’s May 31, 2 2012 and i t Program P might be A ITEM D-1 MTC 3 equipmen nd security This projec ng has been hes, kiosks provements r cosmetic report and ) The SLO proposes to ct will also signs and e SLOCOG efore it can eived very reported to advance to project is st notice in with Fisca programs 2012. Fina is expected of Projects e necessary C 3 nt y t n s, s c d O o o d G n y o o s n al s al d s y 22 S S A u T S a 2 T A e 2 n W b B T d s S R O r i p a May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana dependi Major a House a will lea crafting the Ene financin State TDA Summary Annually upcoming Transit Ass State Cont approved th 2012/2013 The Count Auditor’s estimated 1 2011/2012 new base f With a pr between 8. BACKGR The TDA derived fro statewide s State and Ride-On – Obispo reg remaining improveme purposes. T approved a 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA ing on the action con and Senate ad efforts o g financing ergy and C ng titles for A Funding SLOCOG fiscal yea sistance (S troller pro he FY 201 Estimates ty Auditor estimate 12/13 sales LTF used for subsequ oposed Fu 7% and 10 ROUND provides t om ¼ cent sales tax o allocated b – the Con gion. LTF LTF is ents and b The state and the STA agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx final amou ntinues on e. While th on the Hou g portions o ommerce, r the bill. update apportion ar. These f STA). The ovides STA 2-13 estim s for LTF LTF estim is $11,846 s tax reven d for appo uent years, und Reser 0% higher. two source t collected on diesel fu by SLOCO solidated F funds pr apportione bikeway/pe budget in A amount m D-1 ortation\Transporta unts. surface t he House T use propo of the bill. and the N ns Transpo funds inclu County Au A estimat mates and b mates for 2 6,100, wh nue and an rtionments due to the rve of $60 es of fundi in retail s fuel. Both OG to eac Transporta rovide off- ed accordi edestrian f ncludes ST is prelimin ation Committees\ transportati Transporta sal, other The House Natural Res ortation D ude Local uditor subm tes. The S below are h 2012/2013 hich is an n opening c s was $10, large carry 00,000, the ing for tra sales taxes of these fu ch of the s ation Serv -the-top fu ing to po facilities. TA funding nary at this \MTC Committee\ ion author ation and In committee e Ways an ources Co Developme l Transpor mits the L SLOCOG highlights. are higher n 11% inc cash balanc ,686,000. ryover that e actual a ansportatio s. The seco funds are d seven citie vices Agen unding for opulation STA fund g for 2012 s time. \FY 2012\MAY 9 rization bi nfrastructu es will hav nd Means C mmittees w ent Act (T rtation Fun TF estimat Board me r than 201 crease. Th ce. In cont This alloc is not exp allocations on program ond, STA, distributed es, the Cou ncy (CTSA r planning for public ds are use 2/13; the b 9-2012\5-AGENDA ills underw ure (T&I) C ve importa Committee will develo TDA) fund nds (LTF) tes to SLO et on Apr 1/2012 – t his amoun trast, the e ation will pected in th to jurisd ms. The fir , is derive to the reg unty, SLO A) for the g/administr c transit, ed for pub budget ha A ITEM D-1 MTC 4 way in the Committee ant roles in , as well as op separate ds for the ) and State OCOG. The ril 4th and the County nt includes estimate fo not be the he future. dictions are rst, LTF, is d from the gion by the OCOG, and e San Luis ration. The street/road blic transi s not been C 4 e e n s e e e e d y s r e e s e e d s e d t n 23 D B a r l A T B $ S w J G f P I t S T C a m b f o S c b r May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana DISCUSSI Based on th a 5% ($6 revenues a line of defe Available This is the Bikeways $9,136,249 State Tran was receiv June 2012 Governor’s funds are u Proposed • • If the estim the current SLORTA The San Lu Committee adoption o might be re be conside funds. As y or capital p Specifically capital proj bus procur remitted ba 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA ION he County 00,000) fu and unexpe ense in cas for Appor amount av apportionm 9. nsit Assist ed. The ex 2. The tot s Budget fo uncertain. SLO City LTF-$1,9 STA- $22 mated amo service lev Budget uis Obispo e (RTAC) f the RTA ealized as ered for pa you know, projects. y, (see atta jects in FY rement pro ack to the agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx y Auditor’s und reserv ected expen e of any ac rtionment vailable to ment. This tance (STA xact amoun tal amoun for FY 201 Allocation 17,329 wh 9,755 whic ounts are re vels especi o Regional met on Ap A FY 12-13 part of the artial replac STA fund ached budg Y 12-13. If oject, the jurisdictio m D-1 ortation\Transporta s recommen ve to “pro nditures. S ctual TDA to Jurisdi o apportion s amount A) - $1,63 nts of STA nts recom 2-13, but u n hich represe ch represen ealized thi ially in an Transit Au pril 18, 20 3 budget, w e RTA bus cement of ds are very get), RTA f RTA is ab RTAC re ons, subjec ation Committees\ ndation, th ovide for Staff also n A shortfall t ictions $9, n to jurisdi is $861,26 9,855 In J A will be kn mended h until such ents an inc nts an incre is will grea era of con uthority’s 012 and th while also s procurem RTA’s pla flexible – has assum ble to reali ecommend ct to the RT \MTC Committee\ he SLOCO unexpecte noted that to the juris ,997,515 ctions, and 66 greater January 20 nown when here are c time that a crease of $ ease of $4 atly assist ntinuing hig (SLORTA he committ recommen ment projec anned cap they can b med the use ize savings ded any n TA Board \FY 2012\MAY 9 OG Board a ed fluctua this reserv dictions. d it include than the 012, the est n the State consistent a State bud 175,072 or 8,187 or 27 SLO Tran gh fuel cos A) Regiona tee unanim nding that ct (using P ital projec be used to e of $443,9 s on the Pr on-used S ’s direction 9-2012\5-AGENDA approved m ations in ve would b es the Ped FY11/12 timate for e budget is with the dget is ado r 10.05% 7% nsit with m sts and vola al Technica mously rec any cost s Proposition ct-related u fund eithe 960 in STA roposition STA funds n. It shoul A ITEM D-1 MTC 5 maintaining anticipated be the firs destrian and amount o 2012/2013 adopted in e proposed opted, these maintaining atility. al Advisory ommended avings tha n 1B funds use of STA er operating A funds fo 1B-funded s could be ld be noted C 5 g d t d f 3 n d e g y d at ) A g r d e d 24 t w r S m s s i r t May 09, G:\Transporta Transit Mana that RTA s with that c re-distribut SLO Mara major imp should be situations indicates th riders for th transit agen 2012 MTC a ation-Data\_Unsor ager's Report, - MA staff is com ommitmen tion of unu athon & E acts on th recognize with the r hat the DD he day and ncies to pro agenda item rted Stuff\Transpo AY 09-2012.docx mmitted to nt, RTA sta used STA f Earth Day e SLO Tra ed for her resulting d D route to C d an increa ovide free m D-1 ortation\Transporta o purchasin aff concurs funds to th y Impacts ansit syste r hard wor detours an Cuesta Col se over the rides on E ation Committees\ ng the mos s with RTA e jurisdicti (April 22n em and Cit rk with a nd bus del lege carrie e previous Earth Day. \MTC Committee\ st cost-effe AC’s recom ions. nd): As exp ty Transpo all particip lays. Early ed 316 pass year. SLO \FY 2012\MAY 9 ective vehi mmendatio pected both ortation A pants in li y ridership sengers wi O Transit pa 9-2012\5-AGENDA icles possib on regardin h of these ssistant D miting an p data on ith 1,079 to articipated A ITEM D-1 MTC 6 ble. In line ng possible events had ee Lawson y negative this even otal system d with othe C 6 e e d n e nt m r 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 FROM: Jay D. Walter, Director of Public Works Prepared By: John Webster, Transit Manager Tim Bochum, Deputy Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TRANSIT SERVICE STUDY SESSION RECOMMENDATION Receive report and information on Transit service in the City of San Luis Obispo. DISCUSSION Background San Luis Obispo Transit (SLO Transit) has been in existence since 1974 when the City began a small two vehicle public transit operation to assist people in getting around the City. During the system’s 38 year history, the number of people riding the buses each year have increased from about 200,000 in 1974 to just over 1,045,000 in 2011. Today, SLO Transit is a highly visible, well-established alternative transportation provider used by the general public, Cal Poly students, faculty and staff, working residents, seniors, people with disabilities and riders making connections from other parts of San Luis Obispo County via the RTA county bus system. This study session will present general information about the SLO Transit services, funding sources, statistics, achievements and challenges so that the Council and the public can have a better understanding of how providing this service benefits the community. The information below are just some of the highlights that the attached report covers in more detail. SLO Transit Operations SLO Transit, a program operated by the Public Works Department, is the City of San Luis Obispo’s transit provider and operates fixed route service throughout the City as well as trolley service to downtown. Other regional and paratransit service is provided to City residents by the San Luis Regional Transit Authority (RTA) through a joint powers agreement that the City participates in. The City has contracted with First Transit, Inc., since 2001 to provide operations and maintenance for the SLO Transit system. SLO Transit operates a total of seven regular bus routes on weekdays, six routes on Saturdays, and four routes on Sundays, as well as a downtown trolley Thursday through Saturday. Major trip generators include Cal Poly, the Downtown core, County facilities, shopping centers, major employers, schools, and hospitals. SLO Transit Funding Transit funding is made up of grant funds acquired from the local, state and federal levels and is a highly complex, staff-intensive effort. Each of these various funding sources has particular requirements that must be adhered to or criteria that must be maintained in order to receive the funding. Examples of these requirements include: Meeting Date Item Number May 8, 2012 S1-142 Transit Service Study Session Page 2 • Maintaining a minimum 20% farebox recovery ratio for transit operating costs. This means that at least 20% of the cost of day-to-day operations must come from what riders pay for the service (including contract with Cal Poly which is discussed below). • Maximum 50% use of Federal funding (dollar for dollar match) for operating assistance. • Various local matching requirements (that range from 10-20%) for use of funds for capital projects The City and Cal Poly renegotiated a five-year subsidy agreement in return for free rides on the SLO Transit system in 2011. Cal Poly provides approximately $380,000 annually to support use of the SLO Transit system. On-campus parking fees and fines are the funding sources for this payment. This agreement continues the very positive relationship between Cal Poly and the City in promoting transit ridership, reducing vehicle congestion in and around the City. As a result of the ever-changing State budget situation and the continued delay in Federal Transportation Act budget reauthorizations, the Transit Fund has recently been challenged in its ability to forecast budgets as it moves into each new fiscal year. This situation is not likely to change anytime soon, but staff has been diligent in our efforts to account for these instabilities and make long range forecasts for the financial health of the system. SLO Transit Performance This year, because of the strong performance (i.e. high ridership) of the two transit providers in the area, Federal performance measurement criteria were exceeded, resulting in an estimated $720,000 in additional funding being made available to SLO Transit and RTA. These additional funds were put to good use and programmed as part of the Federal apportionment for the area. Ridership numbers for SLO Transit continue to increase, as staff work to maximize the efficiency of the system. Ridership tends to increase as the cost of gasoline rises, causing some people to leave their cars at home and use the bus for work and school trips. The system’s biggest customer remains Cal Poly and its students, faculty and staff, who make up about 60% of the annual ridership. SLO Transit Challenges In reality, 2012-13 is anticipated to be a very challenging year based on projected revenue amounts. While there is likely to be an increase in state funding, this will be offset with greater needs at the regional level, the system’s own cost increases and the potential for Federal funding to be reduced. Capital expenditures will be limited to projects that can be funded from grant revenues, keeping the local match required to a minimum, and preserving as much for operating expenses as possible. Fuel costs are once again very volatile. Fuel pricing is similar to 2008-09 when the City saw the price of diesel fuel spike to $4.40 per gallon in July 2009. If fuel costs continue to rise, the transit budget will not be able to absorb all of the cost increase and service reductions or fare modifications may be required. Staff continues to look for ways to help reduce the impacts of rising fuel costs and the impact to the budget. S1-243 Transit Service Study Session Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact as a result of this Council item, and staff will return with more detailed and comprehensive financial information as part of the 2012 Enterprise Fund review. ATTACHMENT SLO Transit Facts and Figures S1-344 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures San Luis Obispo Transit 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 www.slotransit.org March 2012 S1-445 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 1 2012 SLO Transit Facts and Figures S1-546 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................... 2 Executive Summary ........................................................ 3 Service Overview ............................................................ 4 Citywide and InterCity Transit Services .......................... 5 Annual Performance Indicators ...................................... 5 FY 2011 Ridership Statistics ............................................ 6 Annual Costs and Revenues ........................................... 8 Intelligent Transport Systems and Social Media .......... 10 Cal Poly Subsidy Contract and Partnership .................. 13 Where to Buy Passes .................................................... 14 S1-647 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 3 Executive Summary The City of San Luis Obispo is centrally located in California between San Francisco and Los Angeles. The City has an estimated population of 45,119 (2010 Census Bureau estimate). San Luis Obispo is also home to the California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), a major source of population, employment, and other overall economic and social impacts. SLO Transit is the City of San Luis Obispo’s transit provider and operates fixed route service throughout the City along with trolley service to downtown. Providing just over 1,000,000 rides a year SLO Transit continues to be an integral lifeline service for the City’s transit dependent and transit choice riders. Serving Cal Poly and the surrounding community SLO Transit is viewed as one of the nation’s more successful transit systems and has received numerous recognitions at the state and federal levels. S1-748 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 4 Service Overview SLO Transit is the City of San Luis Obispo’s transit provider and operates fixed route service throughout the City along with trolley service to downtown. SLO Transit, a program operated out of the Department of Public Works with service operations and maintenance contracted to First Transit, operates a total of seven regular bus routes on weekdays, six routes on Saturdays, and four routes on Sundays, as well as a Downtown Trolley Thursdays through Sundays. Five routes operate Monday through Friday evenings during the school year. . S1-849 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 5 2012 SLO Transit Route Map Citywide and InterCity Transit Services Each year SLO Transit operates approximately 400,000 revenue miles of public transportation services with just over 1,000,000 riders annually. Citywide paratransit service is provided to the City through the San Luis Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and its Joint Powers funding agreement. RTA operates the Runabout demand responsive system within the City and also provides intercity fixed route bus service as well as demand responsive service to and from other areas of the county to San Luis Obispo. Other public transit services are provided through Ride On, a subsidiary of United Cerebral Palsy of San Luis Obispo, Inc. that acts as the county’s Coordinated Transportation Service Provider (CSTA) that provides specialty services such as the senior and veteran’s shuttles. Annual Performance Indicators With a service area of just over 50,000 residents (including Cal Poly) SLO Transit continues to provide service to over 1,000,000 passengers annually – a significant ridership amount for a population this size. Annual System Performance Measures 20072008200920102011 Annual Passengers 934,5341,003,6301,032,2321,019,5091,045,299 Revenue Hours 32,65333,76034,15034,60633,726 Revenue Miles 367,217381,609378,994396,405397,495 Peak Vehicles 11 10 10 10 10 Intracity Fixed Route •SLO Transit Intercity Fixed Route •SLO RTA •Greyhound •Amtrak Paratransit and other demand responsive •RTA - Runabout •Ride On (CSTA) S1-950 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 6 FY 2011 Ridership Statistics FY 2011 Non-Cal Poly/Senior/Disabled Pass Usage Pass Type Riders Percentage Regional Pass 5394740.54% Regional Day Pass 1533611.53% 31-Day Reg Pass 2146916.13% 31-Day Student Pass 126979.54% DAP Pass 1348310.13% 1-Day Reg Pass 62794.72% 3-Day Reg Pass 23891.80% Pass Override 34172.57% 5-Day Reg Pass 11130.84% Punch Reg Pass 3030.23% 1 Ride Pass 14071.06% 7-Day Reg Pass 12260.92% Subtotal:1330660.00% 721,466 677,355 705,806 938,952 955,287 934,534 1,003,630 1,032,232 1,019,509 1,045,299 394,674 392,462 361,378 379,000 364,539 367,217 381,609 378,994 396,405 397,495 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Annual Passengers and Revenue Miles Annual Passengers Revenue Miles 1 Ride Pass 1,407 1% 1-Day Reg Pass 6,279 5% 3-Day Reg Pass 2,389 2% 5-Day Reg Pass 1,113 1% 7-Day Reg Pass 1,226 1% 31-Day Reg Pass 21,469 16% 31-Day Student Pass 12,697 10% DAP Pass 13,483 10% Pass Override 3,417 3% Punch Reg Pass 303 0% Regional Day Pass 15,336 11% Regional Pass 53,947 40% S1-1051 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 7 FY 2011 Senior/Disabled Cash and Pass Usage Senior/Disabled & Cash Riders Percent Regular Cash 97,92746.42% S/D Cash 26,32312.48% Punch S/D Pass 1190.06% S/D 31 Day Pass 86,60041.05% Subtotal:210,969 FY 2011 Cal Poly Pass Usage Cal Poly Riders Riders Percent Cal Poly 635,94799% CP Invalid Card 4,1821% Subtotal:640,129 FY 2011 Non Revenue Riders Non Revenue Riders Riders Percent SLO Transfers 20,00833% Free Riders 16,10626% VIP 8,88215% Prado Token 8,14713% Newcomer 2510% Promo Pass 2410% Free Ride Token 1730% Free Ride Event 1,9343% Amtrak 370% Youth 5,4269% Subtotal:61,205 Regular Cash 97,927 46% S/D Cash 26,323 13% Punch S/D Pass 119 0% S/D 31 Day Pass 86,600 41% Cal Poly 635,947 99% CP Invalid Card 4,182 1% Amtrak 37 0% Prado Token 8,147 13% Free Ride Event 1,934 3% Free Riders 16,106 26% Free Ride Token 173 0% Newcomer 251 1% Promo Pass 241 0% SLO Transfers 20,008 33% VIP 8,882 15% Youth 5,426 9% S1-1152 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 8 FY 2011 Ridership By Type Rider Type Riders Percent Regular Rides 230,99322.10% Senior/Disabled 113,04210.81% Non Revenue Riders 61,2055.85% Cal Poly 640,12961.23% Subtotal:1,045,369 Annual Costs and Revenues Annual System Expenses 20072008200920102011 Purchased Transportation $ 1,407,686 $ 1,770,499 $ 1,852,431 $ 1,803,066 $ 1,831,806 Fuel $ 326,399 $ 392,652 $ 284,734 $ 300,630 $ 387,857 Transit Administration $ 459,115 $ 303,700 $ 338,055 $ 342,545 $ 404,719 Subtotal Direct Costs (rounded): $ 2,193,200 $ 2,466,900 $ 2,475,200 $ 2,446,200 $ 2,624,400 General Government (Overhead) $ 287,800 $ 280,900 $ 292,100 $ 350,200 $ 357,200 Total Operations: $ 2,481,000 $ 2,747,800 $ 2,767,300 $ 2,796,400 $ 2,981,600 Capital Improvements $ - $ 919,600 $ 2,432,400 $ 986,500 $ 2,728,100 Total Transit Costs: $ 2,481,000 $ 3,667,400 $ 5,199,700 $ 3,782,900 $ 5,709,700 Regular Rides, 230,993, 22% Senior/Dis abled, 113,042, 11% Non Revenue Riders, 61,205, 6% Cal Poly, 640,129, 61% 2011 Ridership by Type S1-1253 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 9 Annual System Revenues by Source Transit funding is highly complex and requires significant staff time to seek out, acquire and administer grant funds at the local, state and federal levels. Each of these various funding sources has particular requirements that must be adhered to or criteria that must be maintained in order to receive funding. Examples of these requirements include: o Maintaining a minimum 20% farebox recovery ratio for transit operating costs. o Maximum 50% use of federal funding (dollar for dollar match) for operating assistance. o Various local matching requirements for capital projects that range from 10- 20%. 20072008200920102011 Interest on Investments $ 4,800 $ 6,381 $ 55,900 $ 5,100 $ 5,600 Grants STATE TDA (LTF,STA) $ 1,546,100 $ 1,598,100 $ 1,139,500 $ 992,400 $ 1,046,200 Other Grants (ARRA,Prop 1B, other) $ 5,000 $ 683,600 $ - $ 979,100 $ 1,290,300 Federal Transit Administration $ 473,000 $ 1,421,300 $ 2,080,000 $ 1,331,000 $ 2,663,500 Fares Fares & Service Charges $ 505,500 $ 516,400 $ 623,800 $ 584,900 $ 592,800 Other Revenue $ 260,500 $ 4,000 $ 13,200 $ (33,000) $ 22,500 Total: $ 2,794,900 $ 4,229,800 $ 3,912,400 $ 3,859,500 $ 5,620,900 Purchased Transportation $1,831,800 61% Fuel $387,900 13% Transit Administration $404,700 14% General Government $357,200 12% 2011 Expenses By Type S1-1354 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 10 As a result of the ever-turbulent State budget situation and the continued delay in Federal Transportation budget authorizations, the Transit Fund has recently been impacted in forecasting budgets as we move into each fiscal year. This situation is not likely to change due to a number of factors including the state of the economy, the continuing problems at the Federal level in passing budgets on time and with priorities, and the continued conversion of transportation grants, particularly for capital, to competitive processes. Transit Funding Sources State • Transportation Development Act (TDA) • State Transit Assistance • Proposition 1B • Public Transportation Modernization Improvement Account (PTMISEA) • State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) • California Emergency Management Agency (CAL EMA) Federal • Federal Transit Administration (FTA) • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) System Farebox Revenues by Source 20072008200920102011 Cash Fares $ 121,296 $ 127,230 $ 137,103 $ 140,784 $ 126,000 Trolley Cash $ 6,852 $ 6,815 $ 9,320 $ 6,648 $ 6,000 Prado Tokens $ 5,690 $ 7,570 $ 17,707 $ 24,084 $ 12,600 Downtown Access Pass $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,500 General Passes $ 44,675 $ 49,480 $ 49,233 $ 51,198 $ 51,709 Script/Promo Pass $ 7,700 $ 2,745 $ 1,910 $ 2,319 $ 2,342 Other Pass $ (2,677) $ 557 $ 5,643 $ (275) $ 6,000 Cal Poly $ 322,000 $ 322,000 $ 391,600 $ 341,610 $ 351,900 SLORTA Regional Pass $ - $ - $ 11,190 $ 18,500 $ 26,756 Total:505,500$ 516,400$ 623,800$ 584,900$ 592,800$ Source: Year End Transit Change In Working Capital Actuals Intelligent Transport Systems and Social Media Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) & OTvia2 In 2009/10 the City replaced SLO Transit’s antiquated Efficient Deployment of Advanced Public Transportation Systems (EDAPTS) which functioned as our bus information and locator system. At that time, the EDAPTS system was over eight years old and performed intermittently due to old, outdated equipment and limited maintenance support. A new AVL system was chosen, Digital Recorders, Inc. (DRI) which uses fixed end equipment and software (including covert S1-1455 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 11 alarms) along with an internet based passenger access system (Otvia) which includes real time bus information and locator. Existing EDAPTS signs and equipment were retrofit and updated to integrate with the new system and reinstalled at the Downtown Transit Center and on Cal Poly campus at Kennedy Library. All new SLO Transit vehicles include equipment manufactured by DRI . This equipment operates the automatic bus stop announcement system on the newer buses as well as the on time location devices used for the AVL system. The AVL system was funded using $405,000 of 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding and did not require any local match. Transit system on time performance is a key performance indicator and the goal is for all routes to operate at or above 95% on time. A bus is considered late if it is running ten or more minutes from the printed route schedule departure time. The AVL system automatically tracks and reports system performance and SLO Transit routes individually and as a system consistently average 96% or higher. On time performance is reviewed and evaluated on a monthly basis as part of the operations and maintenance contract with First Transit. SLO Transit Automated Vehicle Location System Digital Recorders® OTvia2® provides a new level of convenience and confidence to the riding public. Rather than relying on traditional paper schedules, passengers can now be informed of arrival predictions in real time via their computer or smart phone. S1-1556 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 12 Online Vehicle Tracking available at: http://schedule.slotransit.org/ OTvia2® is web-based and independent of the City’s computing platform, universally empowering our passengers with the tools they need to optimize their time. By incorporating standard Google™ maps and controls, OTvia2® provides a bus location interface that is both instantly familiar and always up-to-date. SLO Bus Tracker Mobile App S1-1657 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 13 Cal Poly Subsidy Contract and Partnership Cal Poly passengers represent over sixty-two percent (62%) of the annual trips on SLO Transit. Cal Poly encourages students, faculty and staff to utilize the SLO Transit system as part of its overall transportation sustainability strategies and as a convenience to its students. Strong Cal Poly ridership assists the City in capturing transportation funding from various state and federal sources in addition to the subsidy paid directly by Cal Poly. These funds allow the City to provide a more frequent transportation service to the entire San Luis Obispo community. Cal Poly Crush Loads on the Double Deck Bus – Lower Level Upper Level The City and Cal Poly renegotiated a five year subsidy agreement to ensure free rides on the SLO Transit system in 2011. This agreement continues the very positive relations between the University and City in promoting transit ridership and reduced vehicle dependence in and around the City. The following shows the annual subsidy allocations to be provided by the University for the next five years. FY Subsidy % Increase 2010-11* $351,858 *Agreement renegotiated 2011-12 $380,000 8.0% 2012-13 $395,200 4.0% 2013-14 $403,104 2.0% 2014-15 $415,197 3.0% 2015-16 $427,653 3.0% Total Payments $2,021,154 S1-1758 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 14 Where to Buy Passes SLO Transit works with SLO Regional Rideshare, RTA , other transit operators and private consignment locations to sell passes to the SLO Transit System. Online passes can be purchased at www.rideshare.org/purchaseyourpass.aspx. Regional Rideshare Pass Sales Webpage www.rideshare.org/purchaseyourpass.aspx San Luis Obispo Area Pass Outlets Albertsons SLO Transit passes Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Broad Street, San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce SLO Transit passes 1039 Chorro Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo Public Works RTA, SCAT & SLO Transit passes 976 Osos Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-781-5252 S1-1859 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 15 San Luis Obispo Area Pass Outlets (con’t) San Luis Obispo Finance Department at City Hall SLO Transit passes 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority RTA & SCAT passes 179 Cross Street, Suite A, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-781-4472 Look for the silver building with the bright red roof! Cal Poly State University RTA, SCAT & SLO Transit passes (Students, Faculty, and Emeritus only) Cashiers Office, Administrative Building Cuesta College RTA, SCAT & SLO Transit passes (Students and Faculty only) Main Cashier, Administrative Building Rabobank RTA & SCAT passes 2276 Broad St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, or 75 Santa Rosa St., San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 S1-1960 2012 SLO Transit - Facts and Figures March 2012 Page | 16 SLO Transit Organization Chart How to Reach Us: City Council Public Works Department Director Deputy Director Transit Manager Transit Assistant Transit Intern .5 FTE Mass Transportation Committee City Council Mayor: Jan Marx Vice-Mayor: Dan Carpenter Council Members: Andrew Carter Kathy Smith John Ashbaugh Mass Transportation Committee Chair: Elizabeth Thyne Vice-Chair: Stanley Yucikas Committee Members: Jody Frey (Disabled) Susan Rains (Cal Poly) Jean Long (Student) Todd Katz (Member at Large) Art Apruzzese (Technical) Louise Justice (Alternate) Jonathan Ellis (Alternate) John Webster Transit Manager 805-781-7121 San Luis Obispo Transit 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 www.slotransit.org S1-2061 MT C A G E N D A I T E M - D 2 A T T A C H M E N T “ A ” - MA Y 0 9 , 2 0 1 2 R E G U L A R M E E T I N G G: \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n - D a t a \ _ U n s o r t e d S t u f f \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n \ T r a n s po r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e s \ M T C C o m m i t t e e \ F Y 2 0 1 2 \ M A Y 9 - 2 0 1 2 \ 6 - D 2 - A T T A C H M E N T A - M T C P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T S M A Y 0 9 - 2 0 1 2 . d o c x 1 F e b - 1 1 G A L A M T C O S T / G A L D I E S E L 9 , 2 9 3 . 0 0 $ 3 1 , 8 7 1 . 6 8 $ 3 . 4 3 C N G 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 G A S 2 4 9 . 3 0 $ 8 1 6 . 5 7 $ 3 . 2 8 T O T A L 9 , 5 4 2 . 3 0 $ 3 2 , 6 8 8 . 2 5 $ 3 . 4 3 M a r - 1 1 G A L A M T C O S T / G A L D I E S E L 1 0 , 3 8 6 . 0 0 $ 4 0 , 1 0 0 . 2 1 $ 3 . 8 6 C N G 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 G A S 3 7 3 . 0 0 $ 1 , 4 4 1 . 4 5 $ 3 . 8 6 T O T A L 1 0 , 7 5 9 . 0 0 $ 4 1 , 5 4 1 . 6 6 $ 3 . 8 6 62 MT C A G E N D A I T E M - D 2 A T T A C H M E N T “ A ” - MA Y 0 9 , 2 0 1 2 R E G U L A R M E E T I N G G: \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n - D a t a \ _ U n s o r t e d S t u f f \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n \ T r a n s po r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e s \ M T C C o m m i t t e e \ F Y 2 0 1 2 \ M A Y 9 - 2 0 1 2 \ 6 - D 2 - A T T A C H M E N T A - M T C P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T S M A Y 0 9 - 2 0 1 2 . d o c x 2 F e b - 1 2 G A L A M T C O S T / G A L D I E S E L 9 , 3 6 4 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 7 1 9 . 0 5 $ 3 . 8 1 C N G 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0 G A S 2 3 1 . 3 0 $ 9 5 0 . 9 6 $ 4 . 1 1 T O T A L 9 , 5 9 5 . 3 0 $ 3 6 , 6 7 0 . 0 1 $ 3 . 8 2 M a r - 1 2 G A L A M T C O S T / G A L D I E S E L 9 , 9 7 2 . 3 0 $ 3 9 , 7 9 3 . 4 7 $ 3 . 9 9 C N G 0 . 0 0 - $ $ 0 . 0 0 G A S 1 3 5 . 5 0 5 8 9 . 3 5 $ $ 4 . 3 5 T O T A L 1 0 , 1 0 7 . 8 0 $ 4 0 , 3 8 2 . 8 2 $ 4 . 0 0 63 MT C A G E N D A I T E M - D 2 A T T A C H M E N T “ A ” - MA Y 0 9 , 2 0 1 2 R E G U L A R M E E T I N G G: \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n - D a t a \ _ U n s o r t e d S t u f f \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n \ T r a n s po r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e s \ M T C C o m m i t t e e \ F Y 2 0 1 2 \ M A Y 9 - 2 0 1 2 \ 6 - D 2 - A T T A C H M E N T A - M T C P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T S M A Y 0 9 - 2 0 1 2 . d o c x 3 To t a l C o s t a l l F u e l s T O T A L C O S T a l l f u e l s Di f f e r e n c e D i f f e r e n c e D i f f e r e n c e F Y 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 7 2 0 1 2 v s 1 1 2 0 1 1 v s 1 0 2 0 1 0 v s 0 9 0 9 v s 0 8 J u l y $3 2 , 9 5 9 . 7 9 $ 2 3 , 0 3 8 . 5 2 $ 2 0 , 5 9 4 . 4 9 $ 4 0 , 9 1 4 . 7 5 $ 2 7 , 4 3 1 . 1 0 $ 2 1 , 8 3 1 . 0 2 4 3 . 0 6 % 1 0 . 6 1 % - 4 9 . 6 6 % 4 9 . 1 5 % Au g u s t $3 4 , 5 4 2 . 5 5 $ 2 4 , 8 6 2 . 4 6 $ 2 1 , 6 8 4 . 7 9 $ 3 6 , 4 5 9 . 6 6 $ 1 5 , 5 4 6 . 4 4 $ 3 9 , 5 1 4 . 1 2 3 8 . 9 3 % 1 2 . 7 8 % - 4 0 . 5 2 % 1 3 4 . 5 2 % S e p t e m b e r $3 8 , 4 9 3 . 1 1 $ 3 0 , 5 0 3 . 1 3 $ 2 3 , 8 5 4 . 4 4 $ 3 7 , 4 3 6 . 3 8 $ 3 5 , 6 7 0 . 9 5 $ 3 0 , 3 6 6 . 9 0 2 6 . 1 9 % 2 1 . 8 0 % - 3 6 . 2 8 % 4 . 9 5 % O c t o b e r $3 9 , 8 6 1 . 2 6 $ 3 3 , 2 5 1 . 2 0 $ 2 6 , 4 6 6 . 4 6 $ 3 5 , 3 8 3 . 7 2 $ 3 4 , 3 0 6 . 0 9 $ 3 1 , 5 0 8 . 7 9 1 9 . 8 8 % 2 0 . 4 0 % - 2 5 . 2 0 % 3 . 1 4 % N o v e m b e r $3 6 , 7 5 4 . 4 6 $ 3 2 , 5 7 0 . 8 9 $ 2 4 , 4 3 8 . 1 2 $ 2 2 , 5 2 6 . 5 6 $ 2 4 , 8 7 0 . 9 4 $ 2 1 , 5 2 7 . 1 3 1 2 . 8 4 % 2 4 . 9 7 % 8 . 4 9 % - 9 . 4 3 % D e c e m b e r $2 8 , 2 0 8 . 0 6 $ 2 0 , 7 1 9 . 4 7 $ 2 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 8 $ 1 5 , 2 3 0 . 7 3 $ 3 3 , 7 1 6 . 1 9 $ 2 5 , 9 8 8 . 4 6 3 6 . 1 4 % - 3 . 9 6 % 4 1 . 4 3 % - 5 4 . 8 3 % J a n u a r y $ 3 8 , 4 9 8 . 4 2 $ 3 2 , 2 0 4 . 0 8 $ 2 6 , 3 8 3 . 9 9 $ 2 0 , 6 2 0 . 0 3 $ 3 0 , 6 9 0 . 0 7 $ 1 8 , 4 9 4 . 1 1 1 9 . 5 5 % 1 8 . 0 7 % 2 7 . 9 5 % - 3 2 . 8 1 % F e b r u a r y $ 3 6 , 6 7 0 . 0 1 $ 3 2 , 6 8 8 . 2 5 $ 2 4 , 9 5 5 . 9 5 $ 1 8 , 0 3 0 . 9 3 $ 2 8 , 4 6 5 . 2 7 $ 2 4 , 9 0 9 . 6 4 1 2 . 1 8 % 2 3 . 6 5 % 3 8 . 4 1 % - 3 6 . 6 6 % M a r c h $ 4 0 , 3 8 2 . 8 2 $ 4 1 , 5 4 1 . 6 6 $ 3 0 , 0 8 3 . 1 1 $ 1 8 , 4 7 2 . 5 1 $ 3 4 , 5 0 3 . 9 0 $ 2 7 , 3 9 8 . 6 0 - 2 . 7 9 % 2 7 . 5 8 % 6 2 . 8 5 % - 4 6 . 4 6 % A p r i l $0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 6 5 0 . 9 2 $ 2 9 , 0 6 6 . 4 6 $ 1 9 , 7 5 1 . 9 5 $ 4 1 , 7 6 9 . 3 7 $ 2 8 , 5 1 1 . 8 6 - 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 1 . 8 5 % 4 7 . 1 6 % - 5 2 . 7 1 % M a y $0 . 0 0 $ 4 2 , 6 9 9 . 7 8 $ 2 7 , 4 1 2 . 5 2 $ 2 0 , 2 1 7 . 7 4 $ 4 4 , 6 0 5 . 7 9 $ 3 1 , 9 5 7 . 4 3 - 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 3 5 . 8 0 % 3 5 . 5 9 % - 5 4 . 6 7 % J u n e $0 . 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 5 . 9 6 $ 2 6 , 2 0 7 . 8 2 $ 1 9 , 9 0 7 . 1 6 $ 4 1 , 0 7 5 . 7 5 $ 2 4 , 3 9 1 . 5 3 - 1 0 0 . 0 0 % 2 7 . 2 1 % 3 1 . 6 5 % - 5 1 . 5 4 % $3 2 6 , 3 7 0 . 4 8 $ 3 9 2 , 7 3 6 . 3 2 $ 3 0 2 , 6 8 8 . 2 3 $ 3 0 4 , 9 5 2 . 1 2 $ 3 9 2 , 6 5 1 . 8 6 $ 3 2 6 , 3 9 9 . 5 9 - 1 6 . 9 0 % 2 2 . 9 3 % - 0 . 7 4 % - 2 2 . 3 4 % Co s t P e r G a l l o n C o m p a r i s o n Di f f e r e n c e Di f f e r e n c e D i f f e r e n c e r FY 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 7 2 0 1 2 v s 1 1 2 0 1 1 v s 1 0 2 0 1 0 v s 0 9 0 9 v s 0 8 v Ju l y $3 . 7 2 $ 2 . 8 2 $ 2 . 4 1 $ 4 . 3 9 $ 2 . 8 3 $ 2 . 2 7 3 1 . 9 3 % 1 4 . 5 1 % - 4 4 . 9 7 % 5 4 . 9 1 % Au g u s t $3 . 7 1 $ 2 . 8 8 $ 2 . 5 7 $ 3 . 9 1 $ 2 . 6 7 $ 2 . 7 7 2 8 . 9 4 % 1 0 . 8 1 % - 3 4 . 3 8 % 4 6 . 7 9 % Se p t e m b e r $3 . 6 5 $ 2 . 9 6 $ 2 . 5 1 $ 3 . 5 3 $ 2 . 7 3 $ 2 . 6 0 2 3 . 1 7 % 1 5 . 3 3 % - 2 8 . 9 9 % 2 9 . 5 7 % Oc t o b e r $3 . 6 8 $ 3 . 1 2 $ 2 . 5 7 $ 3 . 0 2 $ 3 . 0 1 $ 2 . 3 4 1 7 . 7 7 % 1 7 . 6 5 % - 1 4 . 8 5 % 0 . 4 7 % No v e m b e r $3 . 7 4 $ 3 . 2 1 $ 2 . 6 3 $ 2 . 2 6 $ 3 . 2 7 $ 2 . 4 0 1 6 . 4 1 % 1 8 . 2 2 % 1 6 . 1 9 % - 3 0 . 7 8 % De c e m b e r $3 . 5 0 $ 3 . 2 0 $ 2 . 5 8 $ 1 . 8 6 $ 3 . 7 7 $ 2 . 5 2 9 . 2 8 % 1 9 . 4 0 % 3 8 . 8 2 % - 5 0 . 6 1 % Ja n u a r y $3 . 6 2 $ 3 . 2 0 $ 2 . 7 0 $ 1 . 9 2 $ 3 . 0 5 $ 2 . 4 0 1 3 . 2 2 % 1 5 . 5 0 % 4 1 . 0 1 % - 3 7 . 0 5 % Fe b r u a r y $3 . 8 2 $ 3 . 4 3 $ 2 . 6 9 $ 1 . 9 0 $ 3 . 0 4 $ 2 . 5 8 1 1 . 5 6 % 2 1 . 5 2 % 4 1 . 8 4 % - 3 7 . 5 7 % Ma r c h $4 . 0 0 $ 3 . 8 6 $ 2 . 9 0 $ 1 . 7 8 $ 3 . 3 8 $ 2 . 5 5 3 . 4 7 % 2 4 . 9 8 % 6 2 . 6 0 % - 4 7 . 2 6 % Ap r i l $3 . 8 9 $ 4 . 0 5 $ 2 . 8 8 $ 1 . 8 7 $ 3 . 5 2 $ 2 . 6 0 - 3 . 8 5 % 2 8 . 7 8 % 5 4 . 0 9 % - 4 6 . 9 3 % Ma y #D I V / 0 ! $ 3 . 8 7 $ 2 . 8 2 $ 1 . 9 3 $ 4 . 0 4 $ 2 . 6 5 # D I V / 0 ! 2 7 . 1 9 % 4 5 . 8 1 % - 5 2 . 1 5 % Ju n e #D I V / 0 ! $ 3 . 7 2 $ 2 . 7 8 $ 2 . 2 1 $ 4 . 2 2 $ 2 . 7 3 # D I V / 0 ! 2 5 . 2 6 % 2 5 . 8 0 % - 4 7 . 5 9 % $3 . 7 3 $ 3 . 3 9 $ 2 . 6 8 $ 2 . 5 5 $ 3 . 3 0 $ 2 . 5 4 1 0 . 0 7 % 2 0 . 9 7 % 5 . 1 3 % - 2 2 . 9 1 % CO S T / G A L a l l f u e l s 64 MT C A G E N D A I T E M - D 2 A T T A C H M E N T “ A ” - MA Y 0 9 , 2 0 1 2 R E G U L A R M E E T I N G G: \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n - D a t a \ _ U n s o r t e d S t u f f \ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n \ T r a n s po r t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e s \ M T C C o m m i t t e e \ F Y 2 0 1 2 \ M A Y 9 - 2 0 1 2 \ 6 - D 2 - A T T A C H M E N T A - M T C P E R F O R M A N C E R E P O R T S M A Y 0 9 - 2 0 1 2 . d o c x 4 -1 0 , 0 0 0 15 , 0 0 0 40 , 0 0 0 65 , 0 0 0 90 , 0 0 0 11 5 , 0 0 0 14 0 , 0 0 0 Ju l y A u g u s t S e p t e m b e r O c t o b e r N o v e m b e r D e c e m b e r J a n u a r y F e b r u a r y M a r c h A p r i l M a y J u n e Riders Mo n t h SL O T r a n s i t R i d e r s h i p b y F i s c a l Y e a r 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 65 Ex h i b i t D AG E N C Y : S a n L u i s O b i s p o T r a n s i t Ri d e r s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ca l P o l y TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL Op e r a t i n g M o d e Ev e n i n g S e r v i c e 1s t Q t r 99 , 7 7 0 6, 8 8 0 74 , 1 8 3 18 0 , 8 3 3 28 0 63 2 2, 4 0 3 2,9866,301 2n d Q t r 10 4 , 0 7 0 2, 7 0 2 19 4 , 8 5 7 30 1 , 6 2 9 71 5 1, 5 6 6 8, 1 4 6 10,43120,858 3r d Q t r 10 3 , 2 6 6 1, 9 3 3 23 4 , 9 0 1 34 0 , 1 0 0 83 3 2, 1 8 6 9, 2 3 6 14,95827,213 4t h Q t r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 30 7 , 1 0 6 11 , 5 1 5 50 3 , 9 4 1 82 2 , 5 6 2 1, 8 2 8 4, 3 8 4 19 , 7 8 5 28,37554,372 An n u a l T o t a l Re v e n u e - H o u r s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r 7, 6 4 9 . 6 4 19 6 . 0 0 7, 8 4 5 . 6 4 26 . 6 0 34 . 2 0 92 . 1 5 83.98236.93 2n d Q t r 7, 9 8 1 . 4 3 16 6 . 0 0 8, 1 4 7 . 4 3 74 . 2 0 95 . 4 0 25 7 . 0 5 234.26660.91 3r d Q t r 8, 5 3 9 . 4 8 52 . 0 0 8, 5 9 1 . 4 8 86 . 8 0 11 1 . 6 0 30 0 . 7 0 274.04773.14 4t h Q t r 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0.000.00 24 , 1 7 0 . 5 5 41 4 . 0 0 24 , 5 8 4 . 5 5 18 7 . 6 0 24 1 . 2 0 64 9 . 9 0 592.281,670.98 An n u a l T o t a l Re v e n u e - M i l e s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r 92 , 5 7 1 1, 6 0 4 94 , 1 7 5 39 7 57 8 1, 0 3 1 8152,821 2n d Q t r 95 , 4 8 3 1, 0 8 9 96 , 5 7 2 1, 0 7 5 1, 5 7 7 2, 3 7 0 1,7146,736 3r d Q t r 10 2 , 0 4 8 45 3 10 2 , 5 0 1 1, 3 2 2 1, 9 5 9 3, 6 3 8 2,2609,179 4t h Q t r 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 29 0 , 1 0 2 3, 1 4 6 29 3 , 2 4 8 2, 7 9 4 4, 1 1 4 7, 0 3 9 4,78918,736 An n u a l T o t a l 98 . 9 3 % 1. 0 7 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 0. 9 5 % 1. 4 0 % 2. 4 0 % 1.63%6.39% % o f R e v M i l e s Ri d e r s / H o u r FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r 22 . 7 4 35 . 1 0 23 . 0 5 10 . 5 3 18 . 4 8 26 . 0 8 35.5626.59 2n d Q t r 37 . 4 5 16 . 2 8 37 . 0 2 9. 6 4 16 . 4 2 31 . 6 9 44.5331.56 3r d Q t r 39 . 6 0 37 . 1 7 39 . 5 9 9. 6 0 19 . 5 9 30 . 7 1 54.5835.20 4t h Q t r 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0.000.00 An n u a l A v g 33 . 5 6 27 . 8 1 33 . 4 6 9. 7 4 18 . 1 8 30 . 4 4 47.9132.54 Pa g e 1 o f 4 4/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 66 Op e r a t i n g C o s t s FY 1 1 / 1 2 F i x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL Op e r a t i n g M o d e Ev e n i n g S e r v i c e 1s t Q t r 54 9 , 0 0 8 . 2 0 21 , 7 1 3 . 8 0 57 0 , 7 2 2 . 0 0 88 3 . 7 0 1, 9 9 4 . 6 0 7, 5 8 4 . 0 0 9,424.0019,886.30 2n d Q t r 57 0 , 0 5 8 . 5 0 5, 1 5 2 . 8 0 57 5 , 2 1 1 . 3 0 1, 3 6 3 . 5 0 2, 9 8 6 . 4 0 15 , 5 3 4 . 6 0 19,892.1039,776.60 3r d Q t r 61 7 , 1 1 7 . 7 0 3, 5 2 7 . 5 0 62 0 , 6 4 5 . 2 0 1, 5 2 0 . 1 0 3, 9 8 9 . 2 0 16 , 8 5 4 . 7 0 27,296.7049,660.70 4t h Q t r 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0.000.00 1, 7 3 6 , 1 8 4 . 4 0 30 , 3 9 4 . 1 0 1, 7 6 6 , 5 7 8 . 5 0 3, 7 6 7 . 3 0 8, 9 7 0 . 2 0 39 , 9 7 3 . 3 0 56,612.80109,323.60 An n u a l T o t a l 98 . 2 8 % 1. 7 2 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 0. 2 1 % 0. 5 1 % 2. 2 6 % 3.20%6.19% % o f O p n C o s t Ov e r h e a d C o s t s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r 85 , 9 0 2 . 5 0 3, 3 9 7 . 5 0 0. 0 0 89 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 13 8 . 3 0 31 2 . 1 0 1, 1 8 6 . 7 0 1,474.603,111.70 2n d Q t r 88 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 80 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 89 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 21 1 . 7 0 46 3 . 6 0 2, 4 1 1 . 7 0 3,088.206,175.20 3r d Q t r 88 , 7 9 2 . 5 0 50 7 . 5 0 0. 0 0 89 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 21 8 . 7 0 57 4 . 0 0 2, 4 2 5 . 1 0 3,927.507,145.30 4t h Q t r 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0.000.00 26 3 , 1 9 5 . 0 0 4, 7 0 5 . 0 0 0. 0 0 26 7 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 56 8 . 7 0 1, 3 4 9 . 7 0 6, 0 2 3 . 5 0 8,490.3016,432.20 An n u a l T o t a l 98 . 2 4 % 1. 7 6 % 0. 0 0 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 0. 2 1 % 0. 5 0 % 2. 2 5 % 3.17%6.13% % O v e r h e a d C o s t To t a l C o s t s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r $6 3 4 , 9 1 0 $2 5 , 1 1 2 $0 $6 6 0 , 0 2 2 $1 , 0 2 2 $2 , 3 0 7 $8 , 7 7 1 $10,899$22,999 2n d Q t r $6 5 8 , 5 5 8 $5 , 9 5 3 $0 $6 6 4 , 5 1 1 $1 , 5 7 6 $3 , 4 5 0 $1 7 , 9 4 7 $22,980$45,953 3r d Q t r $7 0 5 , 9 1 0 $4 , 0 3 6 $0 $7 0 9 , 9 4 6 $1 , 7 3 9 $4 , 5 6 3 $1 9 , 2 8 0 $31,225$56,807 4t h Q t r $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $1 , 9 9 9 , 3 7 8 $3 5 , 1 0 1 $0 $2 , 0 3 4 , 4 7 9 $4 , 3 3 7 $1 0 , 3 2 0 $4 5 , 9 9 8 $65,104$125,759 An n u a l T o t a l 98 . 2 7 % 1. 7 3 % 0 10 0 . 0 0 % 0. 2 1 % 0. 5 1 % 2. 2 6 % 3.20%6.18% % T o t a l C o s t To t a l C a p i t a l C o s t o f C o n t r a c t i n g FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e T r o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r $4 6 , 0 7 7 $7 9 8 $0 $4 6 , 8 7 5 $1 9 8 $2 8 8 $5 1 3 $406$1,404 2n d Q t r $4 6 , 3 4 6 $5 2 9 $0 $4 6 , 8 7 5 $5 2 2 $7 6 5 $1 , 1 5 0 $832$3,270 3r d Q t r $4 6 , 6 6 8 $2 0 7 $0 $4 6 , 8 7 5 $6 0 5 $8 9 6 $1 , 6 6 4 $1,034$4,198 4t h Q t r $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $1 3 9 , 0 9 1 $1 , 5 3 4 $0 $1 4 0 , 6 2 5 $1 , 3 2 4 $1 , 9 4 9 $3 , 3 2 7 $2,271$8,871 An n u a l T o t a l Pa g e 2 o f 4 4/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 67 To t a l C o s t / H o u r FY 1 1 / 1 2 F i x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL Op e r a t i n g M o d e Ev e n i n g S e r v i c e 1s t Q t r $8 3 . 0 0 $1 2 8 . 1 2 $0 . 0 0 $8 4 . 1 3 $3 8 . 4 2 $6 7 . 4 6 $9 5 . 1 8 $129.78$97.07 2n d Q t r $8 2 . 5 1 $3 5 . 8 6 $0 . 0 0 $8 1 . 5 6 $2 1 . 2 4 $3 6 . 1 6 $6 9 . 8 2 $98.10$69.53 3r d Q t r $8 2 . 6 6 $7 7 . 6 2 $0 . 0 0 $8 2 . 6 3 $2 0 . 0 3 $4 0 . 8 9 $6 4 . 1 2 $113.94$73.48 4t h Q t r $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0.00$0.00 An n u a l A v g $8 2 . 7 2 $8 4 . 7 9 $0 . 0 0 $8 2 . 7 5 $2 3 . 1 2 $4 2 . 7 9 $7 0 . 7 8 $109.92$75.26 Re v e n u e s FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ca l P o l y TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r $5 7 , 6 8 0 . 3 9 $3 , 2 9 0 . 1 5 $9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $1 5 5 , 9 7 0 . 5 4 $8 4 . 1 8 $1 9 7 . 9 6 $2 , 6 8 5 . 9 9 $3,737.75$6,705.87 2n d Q t r $5 2 , 4 3 5 . 7 0 $1 , 2 8 0 . 4 0 $9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $1 4 8 , 7 1 6 . 1 0 $1 0 2 . 9 8 $2 8 9 . 1 0 $3 , 5 3 7 . 0 6 $4,890.56$8,819.70 3r d Q t r $6 3 , 1 3 2 . 3 8 $8 9 5 . 4 5 $9 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $1 5 9 , 0 2 7 . 8 3 $1 1 5 . 5 5 $3 6 5 . 5 1 $3 , 3 4 6 . 7 3 $5,932.12$9,759.91 4t h Q t r $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0.00$0.00 $1 7 3 , 2 4 8 . 4 7 $5 , 4 6 6 . 0 0 $2 8 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $4 6 3 , 7 1 4 . 4 7 $3 0 2 . 7 1 $8 5 2 . 5 7 $9 , 5 6 9 . 7 8 $14,560.43$25,285.48 An n u a l T o t a l 37 . 3 6 % 1. 1 8 % 61 . 4 6 % 10 0 . 0 0 % 0. 0 7 % 0. 1 8 % 2. 0 6 % 3.14%5.45% % R e v e n u e Fa r e b o x R a t i o FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ot h e r TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r 24 . 0 5 % 13 . 1 0 % 23 . 6 3 % 8. 2 4 % 8. 5 8 % 30 . 6 2 % 34.29%29.16% 2n d Q t r 22 . 3 9 % 21 . 5 1 % 22 . 3 8 % 6. 5 3 % 8. 3 8 % 19 . 7 1 % 21.28%19.19% 3r d Q t r 22 . 4 0 % 22 . 1 9 % 22 . 4 0 % 6. 6 4 % 8. 0 1 % 17 . 3 6 % 19.00%17.18% 4t h Q t r 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 0. 0 0 % 0.00%0.00% An n u a l A v g 22 . 9 2 % 15 . 5 7 % 22 . 7 9 % 6. 9 8 % 8. 2 6 % 20 . 8 0 % 22.36%20.11% Av g F a r e / R i d e r FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e T r o l l e y Ca l P o l y TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r $0 . 5 8 $0 . 4 8 $1 . 2 8 $0 . 8 6 $0 . 3 0 $0 . 3 1 $1 . 1 2 $1.25$1.06 2n d Q t r $0 . 5 0 $0 . 4 7 $0 . 4 9 $0 . 4 9 $0 . 1 4 $0 . 1 8 $0 . 4 3 $0.47$0.42 3r d Q t r $0 . 6 1 $0 . 4 6 $0 . 4 0 $0 . 4 7 $0 . 1 4 $0 . 1 7 $0 . 3 6 $0.40$0.36 4t h Q t r $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0.00$0.00 An n u a l A v g $0 . 5 6 $0 . 4 7 $0 . 5 7 $0 . 5 6 $0 . 1 7 $0 . 1 9 $0 . 4 8 $0.51$0.47 Pa g e 3 o f 4 4/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 68 Av g S u b s i d y / R i d e r FY 1 1 / 1 2 F i x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ca l P o l y TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL Op e r a t i n g M o d e Ev e n i n g S e r v i c e 1s t Q t r $5 . 7 9 $3 . 1 7 $7 . 2 8 $2 . 7 9 $3 . 3 5 $3 . 3 4 $2 . 5 3 $2.40$2.59 2n d Q t r $5 . 8 2 $1 . 7 3 $2 . 8 9 $1 . 7 1 $2 . 0 6 $2 . 0 2 $1 . 7 7 $1.73$1.78 3r d Q t r $6 . 2 2 $1 . 6 2 $2 . 6 0 $1 . 6 2 $1 . 9 5 $1 . 9 2 $1 . 7 3 $1.69$1.73 4t h Q t r $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0.00$0.00 An n u a l A v g $5 . 9 5 $2 . 5 7 $3 . 4 0 $1 . 9 1 $2 . 2 1 $2 . 1 6 $1 . 8 4 $1.78$1.85 Co s t / R i d e r FY 1 1 / 1 2 Fi x e d R t e Tr o l l e y Ca l P o l y TO T A L RT 2 RT 3 RT 4 A RT 6A/BTOTAL 1s t Q t r $6 . 3 6 $3 . 6 5 $8 . 5 6 $3 . 6 5 $3 . 6 5 $3 . 6 5 $3 . 6 5 $3.65$3.65 2n d Q t r $6 . 3 3 $2 . 2 0 $3 . 3 8 $2 . 2 0 $2 . 2 0 $2 . 2 0 $2 . 2 0 $2.20$2.20 3r d Q t r $6 . 8 4 $2 . 0 9 $3 . 0 1 $2 . 0 9 $2 . 0 9 $2 . 0 9 $2 . 0 9 $2.09$2.09 4t h Q t r $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0.00$0.00 An n u a l A v g $6 . 5 1 $3 . 0 5 $3 . 9 7 $2 . 4 7 $2 . 3 7 $2 . 3 5 $2 . 3 2 $2.29$2.31 Pa g e 4 o f 4 4/ 1 3 / 2 0 1 2 69 03 / 0 1 / 1 1 03 / 3 1 / 1 1 0 3 / 3 1 / 1 2 07 / 0 1 / 1 1 07 / 0 1 / 1 0 03 / 0 1 / 1 2 03 / 3 1 / 1 1 03 / 3 1 / 1 2 Cu r r e n t Pe r c e n t C h a n g e Fi s c a l Y e a r Pe r c e n t C h a n g e To To To To Ta b l e A : R i d e r s h i p T r e nd s b y F a r e C o m p o n e n t Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Fi s c a l Y e a r Ge n e r a l F a r e 35 , 6 9 5 3 5 , 9 4 8 3 0 0 , 5 1 9 3 1 8 , 6 1 1 0. 7 1 % 6 . 0 2 % Ca l P o l y T o t a l 60 , 7 0 0 6 2 , 7 2 1 4 6 3 , 2 8 3 5 0 3 , 9 5 1 3. 3 3 % 8 . 7 8 % RE V E N U E 1 R i d e P a s s 36 . 1 7 % 8. 5 2 % 47 64 1, 0 8 0 1, 1 7 2 1- D a y R e g P a s s -5 . 8 5 % 20 . 0 8 % 73 5 69 2 4, 8 3 5 5, 8 0 6 3- D a y R e g P a s s 92 . 2 3 % 44 . 8 1 % 19 3 37 1 1, 8 0 3 2, 6 1 1 5- D a y R e g P a s s -7 0 . 0 0 % 63 . 9 0 % 16 0 48 79 5 1, 3 0 3 7- D a y R e g P a s s 11 4 . 2 9 % -4 . 5 3 % 77 16 5 97 1 92 7 31 D a y R e g P a s s -7 . 5 5 % -2 6 . 0 0 % 2, 1 3 2 1, 9 7 1 16 , 9 2 0 12 , 5 2 0 31 - D a y S t u d e n t P a -3 4 . 3 7 % -1 . 0 8 % 1, 8 6 8 1, 2 2 6 9, 8 3 1 9, 7 2 5 Am t r a k 10 0 . 0 0 % 10 7 . 1 4 % 2 4 14 29 Ca l P o l y 3. 4 4 % 9. 1 5 % 60 , 3 4 4 62 , 4 1 9 46 0 , 0 3 2 50 2 , 1 4 4 CP I n v a l i d C a r d -1 5 . 1 7 % -4 4 . 4 2 % 35 6 30 2 3, 2 5 1 1, 8 0 7 DA P P a s s -4 . 6 1 % -6 . 5 3 % 1, 2 8 1 1, 2 2 2 10 , 3 8 7 9, 7 0 9 Pa s s O v e r r i d e -0 . 8 1 % -7 . 9 5 % 24 6 24 4 2, 5 7 7 2, 3 7 2 Pu n c h R e g P a s s 38 . 0 0 % 31 1 . 9 7 % 50 69 11 7 48 2 Pu n c h S D P a s s 50 . 0 0 % 59 1 . 1 8 % 24 36 68 47 0 Re g D a y P a s s 50 . 8 0 % 28 . 5 6 % 1, 2 4 4 1, 8 7 6 11 , 3 0 0 14 , 5 2 7 Re g i o n a l P a s s 11 . 8 0 % 14 . 2 8 % 4, 6 7 1 5, 2 2 2 40 , 4 7 0 46 , 2 5 1 Re g u l a r C a s h 6. 1 4 % 1. 8 7 % 7, 8 7 9 8, 3 6 3 71 , 0 7 1 72 , 4 0 1 SR / D I S C a s h 12 . 1 3 % 19 . 9 8 % 2, 4 2 4 2, 7 1 8 19 , 0 6 2 22 , 8 7 1 SR / D I S P a s s -1 . 5 5 % -0 . 6 5 % 7, 6 7 9 7, 5 6 0 64 , 2 9 7 63 , 8 8 2 Pr a d o T o k e n -9 . 9 0 % -1 . 1 4 % 72 7 65 5 6, 2 0 3 6, 1 3 2 NO N - R E V E N U E Fr e e R i d e E v e n t 36 7 6 . 7 4 % 0 3 25 8 9, 7 4 4 Fr e e R i d e r s -3 3 . 9 6 % -2 3 . 0 4 % 1, 5 9 9 1, 0 5 6 12 , 4 2 6 9, 5 6 3 Fr e e T o k e n 30 . 0 0 % 20 . 4 8 % 10 13 83 10 0 Ne w c o m e r -5 5 . 8 8 % 15 . 5 1 % 34 15 18 7 21 6 Pr o m o P a s s -1 2 . 5 0 % -6 . 5 0 % 8 7 12 3 11 5 Tr a n s f e r s -1 6 . 6 8 % 0. 5 5 % 1, 8 4 6 1, 5 3 8 14 , 8 5 8 14 , 9 3 9 VI P 6. 7 2 % 10 . 6 1 % 75 9 81 0 6, 3 4 2 7, 0 1 5 Yo u t h -1 6 . 0 3 % 0 0 4, 4 4 1 3, 7 2 9 TO T A L 2. 3 6 % 7. 6 9 % 96 , 3 9 5 98 , 6 6 9 76 3 , 8 0 2 82 2 , 5 6 2 70 03 / 0 1 / 1 1 03 / 3 1 / 1 1 03 / 3 1 / 1 2 07 / 0 1 / 1 1 07 / 0 1 / 1 0 03 / 0 1 / 1 2 03 / 3 1 / 1 1 03 / 3 1 / 1 2 Cu r r e n t Pe r c e n t C h a n g e Fi s c a l Y e a r Pe r c e n t C h a n g e To To To To Ta b l e B : R e v e n u e H o u r s a n d R e v e n u e M i l e s Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Fi s c a l Y e a r 2. 3 6 % 7. 6 9 % Pa s s e n g e r s 96 , 3 9 5 . 0 0 98 , 6 6 9 . 0 0 76 3 , 8 0 2 . 0 0 82 2 , 5 6 2 . 0 0 0. 5 0 % 7. 6 6 % We e k d a y 89 , 4 6 8 . 0 0 89 , 9 1 4 . 0 0 68 7 , 4 1 4 . 0 0 74 0 , 0 8 9 . 0 0 39 . 0 7 % 14 . 8 7 % Sa t u r d a y 3, 9 0 1 . 0 0 5, 4 2 5 . 0 0 41 , 1 1 6 . 0 0 47 , 2 3 2 . 0 0 10 . 0 5 % -0 . 0 9 % Su n d a y 3, 0 2 6 . 0 0 3, 3 3 0 . 0 0 35 , 2 7 2 . 0 0 35 , 2 4 1 . 0 0 -4 . 5 1 % -0 . 5 3 % Re v e n u e H o u r s 3, 1 3 8 . 2 2 2, 9 9 6 . 7 5 24 , 7 1 5 . 8 2 24 , 5 8 4 . 5 5 -6 . 3 6 % -0 . 3 6 % We e k d a y 2, 7 8 1 . 6 6 2, 6 0 4 . 7 8 20 , 9 9 7 . 7 4 20 , 9 2 2 . 1 3 20 . 5 0 % 7. 7 9 % Sa t u r d a y 19 8 . 8 8 23 9 . 6 5 1, 8 2 5 . 9 2 1, 9 6 8 . 2 4 -3 . 4 0 % -1 0 . 4 6 % Su n d a y 15 7 . 6 8 15 2 . 3 2 1, 8 9 2 . 1 6 1, 6 9 4 . 1 8 7. 1 9 % 8. 2 7 % Pa s s e n g e r s p e r R e v e n u e H o u r s 30 . 7 2 32 . 9 3 30 . 9 0 33 . 4 6 -3 . 9 7 % -0 . 5 2 % Re v e n u e M i l e s 36 , 9 2 2 . 0 0 35 , 4 5 7 . 0 0 29 4 , 7 9 9 . 0 0 29 3 , 2 7 4 . 0 0 -5 . 9 9 % 0. 4 2 % We e k d a y 32 , 6 9 1 . 0 0 30 , 7 3 2 . 0 0 24 8 , 7 5 2 . 0 0 24 9 , 8 0 6 . 0 0 24 . 2 7 % 3. 0 4 % Sa t u r d a y 2, 2 7 9 . 0 0 2, 8 3 2 . 0 0 21 , 8 6 2 . 0 0 22 , 5 2 6 . 0 0 -3 . 0 2 % -1 3 . 4 1 % Su n d a y 1, 9 5 2 . 0 0 1, 8 9 3 . 0 0 24 , 1 8 5 . 0 0 20 , 9 4 2 . 0 0 6. 5 9 % 8. 2 5 % Pa s s e n g e r s p e r R e v e n u e M i l e s 2. 6 1 2. 7 8 2. 5 9 2. 8 0 71 04 / 0 1 / 1 1 04 / 3 0 / 1 1 0 4 / 3 0 / 1 2 07 / 0 1 / 1 1 07 / 0 1 / 1 0 04 / 0 1 / 1 2 04 / 3 0 / 1 1 04 / 3 0 / 1 2 Cu r r e n t Pe r c e n t C h a n g e Fi s c a l Y e a r Pe r c e n t C h a n g e To To To To Ta b l e A : R i d e r s h i p T r e nd s b y F a r e C o m p o n e n t Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Fi s c a l Y e a r Ge n e r a l F a r e 35 , 4 1 7 3 5 , 1 3 2 3 3 5 , 9 3 6 3 5 3 , 7 4 3 -0 . 8 0 % 5 . 3 0 % Ca l P o l y T o t a l 75 , 4 9 8 8 3 , 2 2 9 5 3 8 , 7 8 1 5 8 7 , 1 8 0 10 . 2 4 % 8. 9 8 % RE V E N U E 1 R i d e P a s s -1 4 . 1 3 % 6. 7 4 % 92 79 1, 1 7 2 1, 2 5 1 1- D a y R e g P a s s 13 . 1 7 % 19 . 3 9 % 53 9 61 0 5, 3 7 4 6, 4 1 6 3- D a y R e g P a s s 40 . 8 5 % 44 . 3 9 % 21 3 30 0 2, 0 1 6 2, 9 1 1 5- D a y R e g P a s s 45 6 . 7 0 % 10 6 . 6 1 % 97 54 0 89 2 1, 8 4 3 7- D a y R e g P a s s -7 6 . 4 0 % -1 0 . 5 7 % 89 21 1, 0 6 0 94 8 31 D a y R e g P a s s 28 . 2 9 % -2 2 . 0 9 % 1, 3 1 5 1, 6 8 7 18 , 2 3 5 14 , 2 0 7 31 - D a y S t u d e n t P a -1 0 . 7 0 % -1 . 9 1 % 92 5 82 6 10 , 7 5 6 10 , 5 5 1 Am t r a k -6 0 . 0 0 % 37 . 5 0 % 10 4 24 33 Ca l P o l y 10 . 3 0 % 9. 3 1 % 75 , 1 0 8 82 , 8 4 4 53 5 , 1 4 0 58 4 , 9 8 8 CP I n v a l i d C a r d -1 . 2 8 % -3 9 . 8 0 % 39 0 38 5 3, 6 4 1 2, 1 9 2 DA P P a s s 11 . 8 8 % -4 . 7 2 % 1, 1 2 8 1, 2 6 2 11 , 5 1 5 10 , 9 7 1 Pa s s O v e r r i d e 1. 4 8 % -7 . 2 7 % 20 3 20 6 2, 7 8 0 2, 5 7 8 Pu n c h R e g P a s s -5 . 7 7 % 21 4 . 2 0 % 52 49 16 9 53 1 Pu n c h S D P a s s 20 0 0 . 0 0 % 63 1 . 4 3 % 2 42 70 51 2 Re g D a y P a s s 14 . 0 6 % 27 . 0 4 % 1, 3 2 3 1, 5 0 9 12 , 6 2 3 16 , 0 3 6 Re g i o n a l P a s s 16 . 0 0 % 14 . 4 5 % 4, 2 1 3 4, 8 8 7 44 , 6 8 3 51 , 1 3 8 Re g u l a r C a s h -1 5 . 4 2 % -0 . 1 7 % 9, 5 1 8 8, 0 5 0 80 , 5 8 9 80 , 4 5 1 SR / D I S C a s h -7 . 5 3 % 16 . 8 5 % 2, 4 4 5 2, 2 6 1 21 , 5 0 7 25 , 1 3 2 SR / D I S P a s s 7. 1 9 % 0. 1 5 % 7, 2 7 3 7, 7 9 6 71 , 5 7 0 71 , 6 7 8 Pr a d o T o k e n 9. 9 3 % -0 . 1 6 % 60 4 66 4 6, 8 0 7 6, 7 9 6 NO N - R E V E N U E Fr e e R i d e E v e n t -3 7 . 5 0 % 46 1 . 0 8 % 1, 6 6 4 1, 0 4 0 1, 9 2 2 10 , 7 8 4 Fr e e R i d e r s -1 1 . 6 9 % -2 2 . 1 0 % 1, 1 2 1 99 0 13 , 5 4 7 10 , 5 5 3 Fr e e T o k e n -4 5 . 1 6 % 2. 6 3 % 31 17 11 4 11 7 Ne w c o m e r 32 1 . 4 3 % 36 . 8 2 % 14 59 20 1 27 5 Pr o m o P a s s 0. 0 0 % -5 . 8 4 % 14 14 13 7 12 9 Tr a n s f e r s -1 2 . 1 3 % -0 . 7 8 % 1, 7 3 1 1, 5 2 1 16 , 5 8 9 16 , 4 6 0 VI P -1 2 . 8 6 % 7. 9 8 % 80 1 69 8 7, 1 4 3 7, 7 1 3 Yo u t h -1 6 . 0 3 % 0 0 4, 4 4 1 3, 7 2 9 TO T A L 6. 7 1 % 7. 5 7 % 11 0 , 9 1 5 11 8 , 3 6 1 87 4 , 7 1 7 94 0 , 9 2 3 72 04 / 0 1 / 1 1 04 / 3 0 / 1 1 04 / 3 0 / 1 2 07 / 0 1 / 1 1 07 / 0 1 / 1 0 04 / 0 1 / 1 2 04 / 3 0 / 1 1 04 / 3 0 / 1 2 Cu r r e n t Pe r c e n t C h a n g e Fi s c a l Y e a r Pe r c e n t C h a n g e To To To To Ta b l e B : R e v e n u e H o u r s a n d R e v e n u e M i l e s Cu r r e n t P e r i o d Fi s c a l Y e a r 6. 7 1 % 7. 5 7 % Pa s s e n g e r s 11 0 , 9 1 5 . 0 0 11 8 , 3 6 1 . 0 0 87 4 , 7 1 7 . 0 0 94 0 , 9 2 3 . 0 0 7. 3 9 % 7. 6 3 % We e k d a y 10 0 , 6 8 9 . 0 0 10 8 , 1 2 5 . 0 0 78 8 , 1 0 3 . 0 0 84 8 , 2 1 4 . 0 0 -2 2 . 4 0 % 9. 4 2 % Sa t u r d a y 7, 0 5 2 . 0 0 5, 4 7 2 . 0 0 48 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 52 , 7 0 4 . 0 0 50 . 0 9 % 4. 0 6 % Su n d a y 3, 1 7 4 . 0 0 4, 7 6 4 . 0 0 38 , 4 4 6 . 0 0 40 , 0 0 5 . 0 0 -4 . 4 3 % -0 . 9 6 % Re v e n u e H o u r s 3, 0 1 5 . 1 0 2, 8 8 1 . 4 1 27 , 7 3 0 . 9 2 27 , 4 6 5 . 9 6 -4 . 8 1 % -0 . 8 5 % We e k d a y 2, 6 0 8 . 8 2 2, 4 8 3 . 2 9 23 , 6 0 6 . 5 6 23 , 4 0 5 . 4 2 -1 6 . 4 4 % 4. 8 9 % Sa t u r d a y 24 8 . 6 0 20 7 . 7 2 2, 0 7 4 . 5 2 2, 1 7 5 . 9 6 20 . 7 5 % -8 . 0 6 % Su n d a y 15 7 . 6 8 19 0 . 4 0 2, 0 4 9 . 8 4 1, 8 8 4 . 5 8 11 . 6 6 % 8. 6 1 % Pa s s e n g e r s p e r R e v e n u e H o u r s 36 . 7 9 41 . 0 8 31 . 5 4 34 . 2 6 -3 . 7 1 % -0 . 8 6 % Re v e n u e M i l e s 35 , 5 0 4 . 0 0 34 , 1 8 6 . 0 0 33 0 , 3 0 3 . 0 0 32 7 , 4 6 0 . 0 0 -2 . 7 1 % 0. 0 8 % We e k d a y 30 , 1 7 5 . 0 0 29 , 3 5 8 . 0 0 27 8 , 9 2 7 . 0 0 27 9 , 1 6 4 . 0 0 -2 9 . 2 0 % -1 . 3 2 % Sa t u r d a y 3, 4 1 4 . 0 0 2, 4 1 7 . 0 0 25 , 2 7 6 . 0 0 24 , 9 4 3 . 0 0 25 . 9 0 % -1 0 . 5 2 % Su n d a y 1, 9 1 5 . 0 0 2, 4 1 1 . 0 0 26 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 23 , 3 5 3 . 0 0 10 . 8 3 % 8. 5 0 % Pa s s e n g e r s p e r R e v e n u e M i l e s 3. 1 2 3. 4 6 2. 6 5 2. 8 7 73