HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/13/2001, 2 - NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY-ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT, TRANSIT SITE RECOMMENDATION. Ccounci L March 13,2001
A aGEnaa Rep.ont
CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O
FROM: Michael D. McCluskey, Director of Public Works
Prepared by: Timothy Scott.Bochum, Deputy Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY - ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT,
TRANSIT SITE RECOMMENDATION.
CAO RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should:
1. Receive and file the North Area Regional Facility(Transit)—Alternatives Assessment Study
2. Adopt Alternative C as the preferred site for the NARF Transit Facility; and
3. Allocate $70,000 from the General Fund Reserve (with possible reimbursement later) for
consultant services to prepare a preliminary development plan of the Transit facility using the
land identified in Alternative C ($45,000), to perform a Phase lI level hazardous material
investigation for the Shell Station parcel ($15,000), and to perform a real estate appraisal of the
Shell site ($10,000); and
4. Authorize the CAO to negotiate and enter into agreements with selected consultants for the
work identified in item#3; and
5. As per Alternative C. direct that the remaining portion of the block be designated as the
preferred site for the City's next parking structure(s); and
6. Direct staff, that as part of the FY 2001-03 CIP budget, to include a conceptual design
investigation study and conduct property appraisals, as described in the staff report, for the
NARF Parking Facility properties.
REPORT IN BRIEF
On October 19, 1999, Council approved the scope of work for a study to determine the best
location for a future transit transfer facility. The study was to also include the possibility of
including a new parking structure that would compliment the transit site while meeting the
increased parking needs of the downtown. The firm of Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) was
retained to prepare the study. The primary. goal for this study was to make recommendations for the
best location for the transit transfer center within the two-block study area. However, based upon
recent developments, the need for some sort of parking facility on the remainder of the block has
taken on greater significance and should be considered a secondary, but very important objective of
the study.
WSA has now completed their portion of this work and have recommended, and staff concurs, that
the City adopt Alternative C — the Shell site, as the preferred location for a future transit transfer
center. Their report identifies pertinent issues regarding Alternative C, as well as the other
� - 1
Council Agenda Report ivARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 2
alternative sites, and makes recommendations to Council for further actions in delivering a joint use
facility that includes a parking garage.
Existing dynamics, and particularly recent projects such as Copeland/Chinatown and the County
Administrative Building expansion project and the potential County Court system expansion, have
focused attention on the fact that the need for parking in this area is beyond the scope of the 250
parking garage studied by WSA. Staff is recommending, if Council deems that a major parking
facility is a major goal (beyond the original 250 envisioned for the NARF study), that additional
studies, appraisals and analysis be programmed accordingly to deliver the project within Council
identified timeframes.
DISCUSSION
Clarification of Names—Why NARF?
One of the interesting side notes in completing this exercise has been the substantial confusion
regarding the many acronyms that have been used in referring to various transit projects previously
undertaken by the City. In order to distinguish this project from those others, a project name (and
alas, another acronym) NARF or North Area Regional Facility,.was chosen as it does not share the
same letters as these other projects. The two subcomponents of the NARF project -transit and
parking, will commonly he referred to as NARF (transit) or NARF (parking) to better assist in
community discussion. To provide additional clarity, project descriptions of the previous acronyms
qxe provided:
iYIMTC Multi-Modal Transit Center—original concept studied (1993) that would create a
major transit transfer center in San Luis Obispo. Similar to NARF in that it
considered the Spring Toyota block as an alternative location. Ultimately
transitioned into two projects—the RTC & DTC (1998).
RTC The Railroad Transportation Center—located at Santa Barbara and High Street for
Amtrak parking and CCAT daily bus layover—potential long-term transfer
location of SLO Transit and CCAT.
DTC Downtown Transfer Center-Improvements to the existing on-street SLO Transit
transfer facility located on Osos Street.
DTT Downtown Transit Terminal - 1984 concept study of 13 transit center locations to
determine appropriate transfer location. (Theon-street Osos bus facility was
ultimately maintained as the bus transfer location)
Background
The City has had various transit transfer studies done over the last 25 years. The sites studied in
this latest report have also-previously been studied. In its latest action on this subject, the City
Council, in March 1998, took testimony and considered a report regarding existing and future
transit center locations within the City. Council decided that the City's ultimate Multi-Modal
Transfer Center (MMIC), now called the Railroad Transit Center (RTC), should be located near
the San Luis Obispo Railroad Depot. It would initially be developed as a parking extension area of
Council Agenda Report—ivARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 3
the Amtrak station, and ultimately (15-20 years), be the regional transit center for the greater SLO
area.
At that meeting, the Council also decided that the existing Downtown Transfer Center (DTC) site,
located on Osos Street between Palm and Mill Streets, would be improved with street widening and
City Hall parking lot improvements to act as an interim facility until the need for the MMTC
(ultimate facility) materialized. This interim facility would maximize transit operations and also
reduce the potential conflicts between automobiles and buses. In August 1998, the City Council
awarded a contract to Insite Associates for the design of Plans and Specifications for the DTC. The
plans and specifications for the Osos Street DTC are now approximately 99% complete and will be
discussed in a separate agenda item subsequent to this report.
As part of the FY 1999-01 budget process, the City Council determined that prior to implementing
the interim facility, one last look at an "off-street' downtown transit transfer facility should take
place, and adopted a new CIP project to identify and analyze the best transit site in a two block area.
These two blocks were: 1) the square block bounded by Santa Rosa Street, Monterey Street, Toro
Street and Higuera Street (commonly referred to as the old Spring Toyota Site) and, 2) the square
block bounded by Santa Rosa Street, Higuera Street, Toro Street and Marsh Street (commonly
referred to as the Bank of America Site).
On October 19, 1999, Council approved a scope of work fora consultant (Wilbur Smith
Associates) to study and make recommendations regarding the transit component of the NARF.
Attachment A depicts the two proposed NARF alternative block locations to be studied. The
Council also provided the following guidelines/details for completing the analysis:
e Eminent Domain —'the consultant should not restrict their alternatives by issues of
eminent domain, except that the historic French Hospital building and the Bank of
America building should not be considered for removal. The likelihood for eminent
domain for all other properties should also be identified as part of the report.
• Full or Partial Takes—the consultant should not restrict their alternatives by full or
partial takes of property.
• Hazmat Clean-up — Identify history, if known, of hazardous material locations for
each parcel and the effect it might have on project delivery.
• Other Public Use — The Council also requested that the potential to include an
additional public use, such as a senior center, be included in the parking analysis
discussion.
NARF(Transit)Site alternatives
Wilbur Smith first identified basic transit needs. To meet the existing and future needs of SLO
Transit and CCAT, a minimum of nine (9) bus bays need to be provided, ideally this should be
twelve (12), to provide maximum flexibility for future transit operations. The consultant used these
guidelines, along with previous study material, to craft eight different alternative site layouts (A
through H) for the two block areas. Six alternatives have been proposed for the Spring Toyota
block, two for the Bank of America block. Each of these alternatives included the provision of a
250-space (note*: the report has a typo error by referring 220 spaces) garage on the remaining
portions of the blocks.
�- 3
Council Agenda Report—n4ARF- Alternatives Assessment,Transn Site Recommendations
Page 4
Each of the eight site development concepts were evaluated with respect to a series of criteria,
which are designed to describe passenger objectives, transit service provider objectives, and ease
of implementation objectives. Attachment B is the Summary Evaluation of the NARF report,
which summarizes each of these criteria when compared to each alternative transit site.
Attachment B'also contains the conceptual site plans for each of the eight transit alternatives and
corresponding parking garages.
Issues of Eminent Domain
The likelihood of eminent domain is very real for both the transit and parking components of a
NARF concept. The City conducted a formal survey of property owners in the area that might be
affected to determine their willingness to part with their property. Response was lackluster (only
50% replied) which gives a partial glimpse of the willingness of these property owners to
cooperate with City progress of the project. Of the responses received only two, the Clinton
properties and Westside Auto, expressed any inkling that condemnation might be avoided by
packaging the right purchase price for the property.
Based upon these results, and knowing the previous testimony of property owners when this
issue was last considered by the City, any pursuit of property..acquisition in these blocks will
likely involve eminent domain.
Issues of Hazardous Materials
The City contracted with Secor Environmental to perform Phase I hazardous waste
environmental assessment for the two-block area involved in the NARF study. Phase I analysis is
a research of all historical data regarding previous hazardous material issues and remediation
experience. Many of the properties in the NARF study area had little documentation on this
issue. The Clinton Properties located along Higuera Street (1144 and 1166 Higuera) have
detailed history and are reflected in the report. The property located at 1144 Higuera, the current
Tire Pros site, has remediated previously identified hazardous materials. The 1166 site, the
northerly portion of the old Spring Toyota site, remains contaminated. All other properties have
little information. Therefore, any sites chosen by Council would need additional physical
investigation'and potential remediation for hazardous material existence.
Issues of Joint-use Parking
The charge of this consultant was to envision a transit center for the alternatives sites that would
also allow for the eventual construction of a parking garage of up to 250 spaces. Further, staff
requested that the consultant investigate the possibility of integrating both the transit center and
parking garage on one site (i.e. parking garage above the transit center) - a concept that would
allow for maximum integration between cars and buses.
The consultant determined that while full integration is doable, this might not be a practical
solution for this area. Issues of ventilation, noise and additional construction costs would all
factor into a project of this nature. WSA has recommended that the NARF project not fully
integrate these two functions because of these reasons. As shown in the various site alternatives,
integration of these components can be achieved largely due to the close proximity of the transit
center and the possible parking garage locations. ,J
Council Agenda Report—ARF -Alternatives Assessment,Transrt Site Recommendations
Page 5
All of the eight alternatives will allow for the eventual construction of a parking garage of at least
250 spaces if Council chooses to implement this project. Some alternatives such as C, D, E and F
could ultimately produce a parking structure that possesses more parking spaces or the ability to
incorporate exterior office or commercial uses.
seM,....Quare Motex aura maotuu raaurt
MOW EMS
OM[Y
i i
I I 1
1
II Ali I � I 1
IIII I ``
--1 --GomBe—�__________y
I SNe I 1 s
J r
1 i
I I
I I l
HIGU[O115f
L
V NT�• ♦y l..ni _ EM[COMfSRCSx[LL b�A`eM 51T[
Figure 1—Alternative C(the Shell site)
Consultant Recommendation -What is the best Transit Center Location?
The Council's primary assigned goal for this exercise was to identify the best off-street transit
center site in the Downtown. As detailed in Attachment B, the consultant recommends that the
City adopt Alternative C (shown above) -the Shell Station alternative, as the City's preferred site
for a transit transfer center in this area.
This recommendation is made from a purely transit perspective that takes into account transit
operation objectives and other issues of importance regarding safety and site layout. Alternative
C provides the most visible transit center and places the center in close walking proximity to the
major employment area of the downtown. At the same time, Alternative C leaves the rest of the
block available for a range of development both public and private that could include potential
future parking structures. Because the idea of acquisition of the Shell station property is a new
one and may seem overly aggressive to some, it is instructive to compare Alternative C - the
consultant's recommended site, to that of Alternative B - the consultant's second most preferred
site. Table 1 lists the pros and cons of these two alternatives for current conditions.
2 - �
Council Agenda Report–NARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 6
s.o w°vm m<oa°xu.anurr
O MONlE°FY ST
1 , nI , I
I IIr J I (
1
I
`S
s IpiJl
y
1
I 11
I
� �) I
I � I
I � I
I wca wwn.n .uarww°w.r I
..:Hwu<ewn
Figure 2—Alternative B(the Compressed site)
Table 1—NARF Alternative Comparison
Alternative C Alternative B
Shell Station Site Compressed Site
Cons Might require condemnation 0 Might require condemnation of more than one
• May include hazardous material remediation- property
yet unknown a May include hazardous material remediation-yet
• Requires widening of Santa Rosa to provide unknown
bus turnout area 0 Requires additional traffic signal along Monterey
Gas Tax/Sales Tax revenue loss with removal 0 Size of Parking garage is limited
of Shell station 0 Additional walk times to major destinations in
Downtown
• Longer transfer distances for transit patrons
Pros 0 Requires condemnation of only one property 0 Allows Shell station use to continue
• Provides most visible transit center a 1144 Higuera site remediated of known
• Provides for transit plaza development hazardous materials
• Maximizes future potential of block for parking
uses
• Acquisition of additional properties(for
parking purposes)may allow for additional bus
bay storage areas
• Walk distance to major destinations minimized
Staff concurs with the consultant's recommendation regarding Alternative C.There are two reasons
that lead to this recommendation. First, as identified by the consultant, Alternative C is the best
transit center location from an operations perspective. Second, by focusing the transit center use
only on one property, the remainder of the Spring Toyota block remains whole. If Council,
subsequently decides that a parking garage of 250 or more spaces is needed on the remainder of the
— (
Council Agenda Report=NARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 7
block, Alternative C allows the community,the greatest flexibility in determining the size, location
and associated uses of such a facility.
Parking Issues and Downtown Dynamics
As stated previously, when the NARF study was undertaken in late 1999, the goal of a parking
component for the NARF site was the eventual development of 250 spaces recommended by the
draft Parking & Downtown Access Plan (PDAP). As we all know, since that time a number of new
projects in the Downtown have been proposed that could affect the potential needed spaces east of
Santa Rosa Street.
The Copeland/Chinatown project is anticipated to be deficient up to 342 spaces when the total
project is completed. The County Administration Building project anticipates the need for 889
spaces for the project and might only be able to supply 140 to 160 spaces. Finally, the County
Courts has indicated that a new court building may ultimately be needed that could increase the
demand of parking to another 650 spaces. At first blush these numbers are staggering when
considering parking issues in the downtown.
Table 2—Project Parking needs east of Santa Rosa Street
Pro'ect Needs Provided Net Need
PDAP 250 N/A 250
County Admin 1172 283 889
Co eland/Chinatown 342' N/A 342
Net Needed: 1481
In addition to these known projects the County Courts have indicated that expansion of their
facilities may occur in the future and may also cause parking deficiencies. While this may occur,
this project is currently speculative and is not guaranteed to occur. Table 3 reflects parking needs if
this project is included for consideration.
Table 3—Project Parking needs Including Court Expansion
Project Needs Provided Net Need
Deficit from above N/A N/A 1481
County Courts 650 Undetermined 650
Net Needed: 2131
The County is currently working on review and update of these parking numbers and an update will
be presented to the Council at the March 13`x' meeting.
Separate from the consultant NARF study, the above-mentioned needs were further analyzed by
staff regarding two issues. First, is the proposed 342 space deficiency created by the proposed
Copeland project accounted for in the 250 space needs identified by PDAPT Secondly, the County
has 105 spaces allocated at the Palm Street garage and can these spaces be credited to the County
projects as well?
� � 7
Council Agenda Report i4ARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 8
After careful consideration, staff believes that the responses to these questions are both yes. A valid
argument can be made that the Copeland/Chinatown project is the growth projected in PDAP.
Likewise, the space needs indicated for the County Administration and Courts are total demand and
as such should be reduced by the current 105 spaces allocated at Palm Street.
Therefore, reducing the above identified deficiency by 355 spaces: the NARF parking component
might need to be 1776 spaces to meet future demand.
So...What are the NARF Parking Options If Alternative C is Chosen?
Assuming that the Council chooses the preferred Alternative C -Shell Station Site for the transit
center, and that the remainder of the site is acquired for the purposes of providing parking, three
options present themselves:
a) surface parking
b) standard parking garage
c) robotic parking garage
Surface Parking. The remainder of the site measures approximately 221' by 306'.. The entire area
would be graded to one consistent slope and paved. Approximately 160 parking spaces could be
provided in the remainder of the Spring Toyota block. About 28' of landscaping would be split
along Monterey Street and Higuera Street under this scenario. It is anticipated that surface parking
would be used as an interim use until a more permanent parking structure with greater capacity
could be built.
Standard Parking Garage. Accounting for standard parking garage bay widths, and assuming no
"below grade parking" levels along Monterey Street (one level would be partially below grade
along Higuera Street), a 45' high, four level standard parking garage would provide 630-700
parking spaces. This estimate assumes a maximum coverage of the site for parking uses and does
not include exterior treatments such as office or commercial space. If uses, such as perimeter office
or commercial space are included, the yield of parking spaces would obviously be reduced.
Similarly, if the top floor of the parking structure was used for residential or senior center purposes,
the reduction in parking spaces would be approximately 160, thus allowing for the construction of
nearly 480 parking spaces on three levels.
Robotic Parking Garai. Robotic parking garages are a fairly new concept in the United States but
are common in Europe and rest of the world. They work extremely well where land prices are very
high or where there is a need for a compact form of urban development. They have the advantages
of safety, no air pollution, no noise pollution, etc. and the disadvantages of heavy reliance upon
"mechanical systems". They do require acceptance of"something new" by the general public that
would be using the structure.
Robotic parking works best in 100' wide design blocks. Thus for this site, it would be possible to
build two garages "back to back" within the 221' design width. Each garage would face either
Higuera Street or Monterey Street. Each garage (100' x 300' x 40') is capable of providing 650
parking spaces with a throughput of 400 cars per hour. This means that check-in and/or check-out
time would be better than that now accomplished with the City's existing garages. Using two
garages would yield a total possible number of parking spaces for the site at 1300 cars. Using the p�
—O
rte.
i
Council Agenda Report--':-.NARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 9
two-garage scenario, one could be built first and when the need arose or was verified (i.e. the
Courts project becomes real), a second garage could be built. This would still leave the total short
of the needs identified, but the difference should be able to be covered if a successful PDR program
evolves.
Because robotic parking garages need no ventilation, the exterior can be built to resemble
residential facades (exists in New Jersey) or office facades (numerous in Europe). This would
decrease the visual impact to surrounding businesses. Likewise, the structure can be placed
underground to obtain even greater capacity or additional levels above to add capacity. Lastly, it is
possible to build a facility on the top floor that can be used as office, residential or senior centers,
etc. which may be considered a benefit in various communities.
Where to from here?
With all the information mentioned in this report, what are the next steps that Council should
consider on this issue?
Transit Issues:
A) A preferred site for the transit component of the NARF project should be chosen. The
consultant and staff recommend that the Council adopt Alternative C as the preferred site for
the NARF Transit Facility.
B) Once a site is chosen, additional work needs to take place:
1 A preliminary development plan should be done. This would establish actual facility
needs and resolve issues such as signal timing and bus routing.
2 The site itself should receive special studies including: hazardous.material (Phase II
level), and a real estate appraisal will need to be completed for the property prior to
commencement of acquisition. This information will assist in determining a realistic
acquisition for the property.
3 Direct staff, that as part of the FY 2001-03 CIP budget, to include funding in the out
years of the budget to perform project development activity such as environmental
review and preliminary design for the NARF Transit Facility.
Parking Issues:
C) In concurrence with an indication that Alternative C is the preferred transit solution, Council
should declare its preference for the remainder of the block as suitable and the preferred
location for future parking facilities.
D) Direct staff, that as part of the FY 2001-03 CIP budget, to include a conceptual design and
investigation project for the NARF Parking Facility. The study will include potential mixed-use
abilities for the site i.e. office, commercial and possible public facilities, and also, the potential
use of robotic parking garage methodologies to maximize efficiency of the parking garage
structure to meet City, County and possible Court needs.
� - 9
i
Council Agenda Report-NARF-Alternatives Assessment,Transit Site Recommendations
Page 10
CONCURRENCES
Staff has been working closely with County Administrative staff on the issues of a joint
development of an off-street parking facility in the Santa Rosa neighborhood. A copy of this report
has been forwarded to them for their consideration.
FISCAL IlVIPACTS
Staff recommends that Council appropriate $70,000 from the General Fund reserve to move to the
next level of investigation for acquisition of the NARF Transit project. This would include the
following work:
Prepare a preliminary development plan of the
Transit facility $45,000
Phase lI level hazardous material investigation
for the Shell Station parcel $15,000
Perform a real estate appraisal of the Shell site $10,000
Total: $709000
The supplemental funding needed for this project is not available within existing resources. As
such, we recommend appropriating $70,000 from the unreserved General Fund balance. Based
on the Mid-Year Budget Review for 2000-01 and Council-approved changes since then, this will
result in an ending fund balance that is 25% of operating expenditures compared with our policy
minimum of 20%. Additionally, this will reduce the estimated carryover balance available for
2001-03 to $1.430,000.
Because this project has been already identified as a major Council goal for the FY 2001-03
budget, using anticipated budget reserve for these purposes now seems logical in order to get the
work started prior to the upcoming budget process. An alternative to this approach would be for
the Council to choose to include this work with all other CIP's considered in the FY 2001-03
budget process in order do comparative assessment and prioritization with.other citywide goals.
As stated, transit funds are not available within the current budget to fund this work. However, as
part of the FY 2001-03 budget, once expenditures for transit operations, bus replacement costs and
other identified CIP projects are funded, there may be sufficient funds to reimburse this amount for
the preliminary work. Review of this issue will take place.as part of the FY 2001-03 CIP process.
In addition to these expenditures and depending upon Council's direction regarding the timing and
scope of the NARF Parking component, appropriations for additional studies will need to be
included in the upcoming FY 2001-03 CIP budget for both the transit and parking components of
the project.
ALTERNATIVES
Seven alternatives basically exist to the recommended plan, Alternative C.
Council Agenda Report=ARF-Alternatives Assessment, Transit Site Recommendations
Page 11
The Consultant has identified Alternative B as its second most preferred alternative. Staff feels that
this alternative severely limits the City's ability to meet future parking needs — by restricting the
amount of land available- and therefore does not concur with the consultant.
Staff feels that Alternative F provides the best possible back-up recommendation. This alternative
provides for the maximum number of buses, is only slightly further away from employment centers,
uses a part of the existing Higuera Street right-of-way and allows virtually the entire remaining
portion of the block available for innovative parking/office/business development. It also requires
taking only a portion of the Shell Station— an idea proposed by one council member at the time of
the RFP approval. On the downside, this alternative requires the purchase of 1144 Higtiera because
all access would be denied by the transit project. Both 1166 and the Shell Station would only have
access denied from Higuera.
The Council has full discretion on the issue of adopting a preferred location for the off-street transit
center. As such, any of the other five alternatives (or none of them) may be chosen regarding this
issue. In addition, Council should attempt to set clear guidelines regarding the scope and timing of
any subsequent NARF issue, such as the parking component.
ATTACHMENTS
A copy of the full NARF Study has been supplied to all individual Council members. A copy of the
:study is available in the City Clerk's office and also has been posted on the City's web site for
public consumption.
Attachment A—NARF Study Locations
Attachment B —NARF Transit Alternatives Assessment Report,Summary Evaluation
I:\Council Agenda Reports\NARF 2001 v2.doc
C � /1
�/
�lJ
�/
2
S r-
ip
0 y
y
9?
H
Oi
S
S\ l
S
noizth anEa REGionat faci ty
a Wansit ana paulanc, faciM
nouth of santa Rosa stReet
executive summauy
INTRODUCTION
As a part of its goal setting process for Fiscal Years 1999-2001, the City Council authorized a
new study of potential off-street transit sites in a two-block area north of Santa Rosa Street.
A previous Council had come to.the conclusion that an off-street transit center would be too
expensive to achieve, in the near term, and had opted to build an on-street facility on Osos
Street between Palm and Mill Streets as an interim solution until someday an off-street
solution could be built. However, the City Council felt that one final look for an off-street
solution should be pursued before implementing the on-street solution. The Council directed
that the two-block area bounded by Monterey, Toro, Marsh and Santa Rosa Streets be studied
as the optimal sites for the transit facility.
Because of the rising need for downtown parking, the City Council also asked that the study
include a component addressing the possibility of a parking structure. At the time of the
Council action, several items were in the news which influenced the need for additional
parking: the Copeland Brothers Court Street/Chinatown project; the County Administration
Building Expansion; and the Parking and Downtown Access Study all showed a need for
more parking in the area. Although identifying the best location for a transit facility was the
primary task, identifying how a parking facility could compliment the transit facility and
meet some or all parking needs was still an important task.
DISCUSSION
The firm of Wilbur Smith was retained to perform the study of the two-block area. Per
Council direction, all properties were considered available for potential sites except the Bank
of America building at the corner of Higuera and Santa Rosa and the historic French Hospital
at Marsh and Toro Streets. Eight different transit sites were studied — six on the block
between Monterey and Higuera and two on the block between Higuera and Marsh. Each of
the eight sites was evaluated against seven criteria, which were designed to describe
passenger objectives, transit service provider objectives, and ease of implementation
objectives.
Number and Type of Bus Bays
Seven of the eight alternatives meet or exceed the desired nine bay bus. loading positions and two
exceed the desired eleven bay positions. Only Concept G failed, falling one short at eight bays.
Concepts A, B and C provide for sawtooth bay designs, which allow full independent access and
egress to each loading bay. All the others provide tandem parallel curb loading positions, which
involve somewhat dependent bus operations. Concept H however provides sufficient space between
its parallel bus loading positions to allow full independent access and egress.
executive SUMMARY — �zth auea aecponal facility (natzq r Page 2
Circulation Safety
Concepts A, B, C, and D with north-south oriented bus aisles located between Monterey and
Higuera Streets were judged to provide the best bus access and egress to the site from public streets.
Concepts A, B and D however would require the installation of a bus-actuated traffic signal on
Monterey Street in order to operate efficiently. Concepts E and F would benefit from a new signal
being installed at the Toro and Monterey intersection. Concepts A, B, C and D were judged to
provide good access based on the site circulation pattern relative to the one-way street system.
Concept H and particularly Concept G relate less efficiently to the one way street system. Concept
E would require closure of Higuera Street to general traffic and would complicate the Santa Rosa
Street intersection operation. Concept F would complicate both the Toro and Santa Rosa Street
intersections.Thus Concepts E,.F,G and H were judged to provide only fair circulation for buses.
Development Costs
All eight concepts are estimated to cost between $1.0 and $1.9 million to construct. Concept A is
estimated to cost more because it is a larger facility providing more bus bays. Eliminating Concept
A from the comparison, the cost range narrows to $1.0 to $1.5 million. All cost estimates exclude
the cost of land acquisition and implications on sales/property tax losses. These land and tax cost
differences probably would offset or minimize differences in estimated development costs shown
on Table 1.
Maximum Transfer Distance
The distance required to walk between transfer buses is important for two reasons. First and most
obvious, people do not like to walk farther than necessary. Second and less obvious, the walk
distance can make the difference between catching your transfer bus and missing it. The distances
shown in Table 3 indicate the maximum distance between the nine desired bus bays in each
concept. At an average walking speed of three feet per second, walking times would range from a
low of 80 seconds for Concept G to a high of 130 seconds for Concept A. Most of the concepts
provide maximum walking times of 110 to 130 seconds.In general, the larger the facility the longer
the maximum transfer walking distance.
Proximity to Santa Rosa Street
Most passenger destinations downtown are located west of Santa Rosa Street. Santa Rosa Street
also functions as a major bus thoroughfare. The closer the transit centers are to Santa Rosa Street,
the more convenient they are for customers and the less out of direction travel required for buses to
circulate to/from the site. Distance ranges shown in Table 1 describe the closest and farthest bus
bay. Aside from Concepts A and F all concepts provide their bays within 300 feet of Santa Rosa
Street. Concepts C, E, and F have some bus bays located at or along Santa Rosa Street. Concepts G
and H located between Higuera and Marsh Streets have their nearest bus bay about 220 feet from
Santa Rosa Street and therefore are the most remote facility concepts.
Visibility
Visibility is important for security as well as marketing reasons. Passengers are attracted to a transit
center when they can see it from their destination (west of Santa Rosa Street). A compact location
along a well-lighted major traffic thoroughfare tends to experience the highest security for waiting
passengers. The most compact and visible location is the Shell Station site (Concept Q. The two
concepts located behind the Bank of America Building would be the least visible of the eight site
concepts. Z' —I/�
executive Summauy 'Rth aaea nerlional �.Ncihty 1nanp paGe 3
Potentia[for Parking
The amount of surface and structured parking which could be provided in conjunction with each of
the eight site development concepts is shown in Table 1. Estimates will vary depending on a wide
range of factors including number of floors, setbacks and retail use trade-off. Estimates for
structured garages assume four floors of parking with no ground floor retail. Increase gain related to
mechanized parking is not reflected in these estimates. Two figures are shown for concepts A, B
and H with the higher number assuming third and fourth floor extension of parking decks over the
transit centers. The six concepts located along Higuera Street and between Higuera and Monterey
Streets appear to offer the greatest potential for increasing parking supplies. Concept D was
designed to avoid the need to use the Dean Whitter Building parcel and therefore no parking
increase would be provided with this concept.
CONCLUSION
Concept C presents the best overall solution for the City — providing a highly visible and
workable Transit Center and leaving the entire remaining portion of the block available for
either whole or partial acquisition to meet parking needs. The transit center can be located on
one property, meaning only one property owner to negotiate with. It will be closest to the
government ct iters of employment and a virtual advertisement of the area's commitrn.nt to
alternative forms of transportation.
However, Concept C is not without its downsides. The present use of the site appears to be a
strong business generating tax revenues for the City. These tax revenues would be lost with
Concept C unless the service station was relocated to a new location that was equally
successful. The property could be expensive based upon current use. The presence of
contaminated soils on the property and related remediation costs could also be
implementation issues that need further investigation.
Concept B is recommended as a fall back possibility. It almost works as well as Concept C from the
perspective of transit riders and transit operations. It is somewhat hidden by the Shell Station but is
still considered "close enough" to the major employment centers. Its development might avoid
possible problems related to the known soil remediation problems of the. 1166 Higuera Street parcel
and would provide an efficient footprint, albeit smaller that Concept C,for development of a parking
garage by the City at the Toro Street end of the block. A bus only traffic signal would be needed on
Monterey Street to safely exit buses from the site. Concept B provides more bus bay capacity than is
required which might be good for future transit expansion needs.
Attachments:
Schematic layouts of Concepts A-H
2 -/S
O O IF4 C
Q C N v o M p
x CDC � 0 I ood LT. ry U
N N U W Z'
CD
U O h V I O �.N 0. y- a
O N O v U 0 0
^ 00 v.. O ` ��
C14 — 00
00
ON N O x 3 A
W pp tz
Z
O O
C O C
O v m c V) - C
CLO
N .�.
0 �
C = G I�r
fn
'D
■� G A 00N O oo O I O 000 y Y 7
C7 rO oC7 00 to
Q 3 aril
W � -
U
Z o ocp� = 0
Q 0 I Q
U C7 N N x
O W A
FWD
r
.flO �: N "o d R y
m o 0 Uo n oo °o u w 12 F c R ,d
60� - M Ci 0 p O`
_ O.
O O
U C £
O O p M y ti
7 C
Q = 0 0o v 000 Mo o E
0 °o void F v m
`^ o o > '
V oc V °- m o
eq
Q — Q N
Ca
C
❑. mow... O t0
0: t. c7
Z 0 � oeh
m a c z n
y W d o r m d m o 3 c
a`> ° 4 0`
w
o L a c EC* c Q•
CL E :.
.�.1 o ani = = (= .x — '� °' E 0. a v
o gr
H 6d_e
C
P
F
W � R
y F.
Z TORO sy
N
.6 1 W
Li
t ;
~} E=11-
At!- :
1 Iti I'_
1401
Cc
1
.�
'`saHta eosa ST
� N
Z C9
W C A
V �^
LT F
rolto S'T'
r` �{
I _
T�
s - ih I I I
— , 4 4911_,• z
t
t; li
I i
IV
IJ I � —•�Ls} �f�l�
t•-
I � k
I; (j
t _
4 -
I
M
<�2=SAWA Rosa ST
slit
e2 —18'
I
Q H C
F N rl•
M 2=
Z ast
06
H
W yA
V �^
y W
I
i
TORO ST r? n
U5 zl-
}
at
O
7
� � I
u 'T
0.1
4i
Imo' u` a1Ll if
--
J a;I as
12LJ
O Jf
w
S
SANTA ROSA ST
A
�n`
�J ,moi
o =�
5s
� 03
m g
V �R
1 T�
rL
f s '
O TORO ST
3
m i
O
t
i
•. .� � to ''�': � �I , I t ,�� I �+
zt
. a m
I t I I -= m77,
I _
MI
, s I ;
3 1 J
----Al
tj
L' �� 1
f IL
J rl J If 4ul —T-IRT1 ` '`'_�
j _ a
ice,. � .r•I � �-k*-r„�?` y�,'.,�'*�-� �.'' �
r -SANTA ROSA ST
/N
amu\
�q
�c
N t:
y�j N 7
Zt ZQee
v C$
Z �
O C
TORO ST s' M >• x
lilt
i '" tel
PIP
IL
� • � � S A�;.�. Y
gym.. ..11 1 .l r y W 91Y l
� � I
• ._ ^, SANTA ROSA ST AAB.�
t
( � t � t t
--Y�
C N:yy
I�O
O r R
a77
Z �'�--+;."'T" tip, p' � ''✓
_._ TORO ST
Z n
o .y kl a n
of
t
1 m
I
0
le
k
ry
Z
n 3)a sttt v e
{ SANTA AOSA ST AIMO (� l
14
s3sna . . .
CJ
> a�
za
N W o
C V u
W �
t Z
_ =Qs
V C�5f
777.__,s W
�Iojto ST -
{{ " > �. ♦ lt„. t t O
s '
JL �
1 l � �• �� W' � ti
rTsativ4s 4wapva/zp$
t
/ I
' • t
�, ... a .- —� "_-✓ c l
G SANTA ROSA ST r 7
_r_K.__.tea � '.N�-4R'�+..,�.�..y„�R"o-'V�-.._ _.+.r siN_•`�'t,.� " `�� j{
L�
�O
� -z3
\�
� .'�
� �.
i'--�1
"..
J \
N V
C
Z QZQa
V C�.
Z ~
0 ? 8jc s .eIL
.°.L �d�'0. ",-..a'„ .�'
Q
'l .. A��..�.SS�u a ._.•.
r'
WIIA
_ Y
t ris
Al
Al
r
1
SA14TA ROSA ST r
swig
MEETING AGENDA
DATE - 3^O ITEM #
I
I City of San Luis Obispo
I NARF - North Area Regional
(Transit) Facility
FINAL REPORT
I VIA
December 21 , 2000
i
f
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAMR
1 Into udion.................................................................................................................... 1-1
' Phase 1 —Constraints Identification and Program Refinement ...... .. ...... 1-2
••.••.
Phase 2—Development of Alternatives................................. • ... •.••.. 1-2
Phase 3—Evaluation of Alternatives...................................................................... 1-3
' Phase 4—Presentation of Findings......................................................................... 1-3
ReportOrganization................................................................................................ 1-3
' Z Review of Program Requirements................................................................................ 2-1
Background............................................................................................................. 2-1
SLOTransit Needs.................................................................................................. 2-1
CCATNeeds.................................................................................................. .:...... 2-3
Summary..................................................................................... .......................... 2-5
' 3 Combined Transit Center Parking Garage Development Issues...................... ......... 3-1
ParkingNeeds.................. .......................................I.......... 3-1
Physical Viability. ..... . . 3-2
..................... ............... .....................••..... ....... ......... .....
' Transit Center Passenger Implications................................................................... 3-2
Costand Funding Implications............................................................................... 3-3
Summary................................................................................................................. 3-3
4 Property Owner Survey Findings.................................................................................. 4-1
5 HazMat Study Findings.................................................................................................. 5-1
' 6 Alternative Development Concepts.............................................................................. 6-1
Site Concept A— 1993 MMTC Plan....................................................................... 6-1
Site Concept B—Compressed Site......................................................................... 6-2
Site Concept C— Shell Station Site ........................................................................ 6-2
Site Concept D—Hybrid Plan................................................................................. 6-3
Site Concept E—Higuera Street Short Transit Mall............................................... 6-3
Site Concept F—Higuera Street Transit Mall......................................................... 6-4
Site Concept G—Marsh/Higuera Transit Center.................................................... 6-4
Site Concept H—Marsh-Higuera 3 Aisle Transit Center....................................... 6-5
I
I 350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY wILBUR smrrH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page
I
OTABLE OF CONTENTS I
7 Summary Evaluation...................................................................................................... 7-1
Number and Type of Bus Bays............................................................................... 7-1
Circulation Safety.................. 7-1 '
DevelopmentCosts................................................................................................. 7-1
Maximum Transfer Distance.................................................................................. 7-2 I
Proximity to Santa Rosa Street............................................................................... 7-2
Visibility................................................................................................................. 7-2
Potentialfor Parking..................•---......................................................................... 7-2
MinimumProperty Needs....................................................................................... 7-3
Summary................................................................................................................. 7-3
Summary and Recommendations........................................................................... 7-3
Appendix A—Environmental Transaction Screen
ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Follows
1 Previous Transit Center Site Alternatives....................................................................... 1-1
2 Site 7B—Toyota Site Concept Plan C............................................................................ 1-1
3 SLO Transit Osos Street Stop Bus Dwell Characteristics.............................................. 2-2 I
4 1996 Transit Services Available in San Luis Obispo County........................................ 2-3
5 2016 Projected Transit Services Available in San Luis Obispo County........................ 2-3 '
6 Location of Potential Future Parking Structures............................................................. 3-1
7 Parking Development Costs Per Space........................................................................... 3-3
I
].50760 '
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page ii
I
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Downtown transit centers are generally developed to facilitate passenger transfers between bus
' routes, to provide a more attractive boarding location for major concentrations of passengers
and/or to provide a location for transit operators to schedule recovery time and end of line rest
I for drivers. Most facilities are passenger oriented in their location and design. The location from.
both a transit operations and passenger viewpoint can be as important or more than the design
and capacity. Large transit centers that support schedule coordinated pulse bus operations are
' primarily built to facilitate high volumes of passenger transfers.
The City has been struggling to provide a safer, more efficient and better designed downtown
facility to support its successful transit system. The transit industry has learned that coordination
of bus schedules to facilitate buses on all routes to pulse at the same time and place makes
passenger transfers more convenient and tends to increase ridership. The Osos Street transfer
' facility however does not.have adequate curb length to pulse all routes at the same time and thus
passenger transfers are less convenient than desired. The location of bus loading positions on
both sides of Osos Street is also undesirable. This arrangement encourages transfer passengers
' to dash across traffic in order to board their transfer bus before it departs. The time envelope for
the transfer is typically very short and the headways are 30 and 60 minutes for SLO Transit
buses. Passengers missing their bus will have long waits.
tA comprehensive review of 13 potential .site locations (see Figure .1) completed in 1993
identified two on-street and two off-street locations that would best meet various bus transfer
' criteria. The City Council, at that time, chose to pursue a variation of one of the recommended
off-street facilities. That report recommended the plan shown as Figure 2 and Concept A in this
report, however, the Council chose to pursue a facility that would solely use the old Spring
' Toyota site. Figure 2 describes the proposed site development concept. Subsequent efforts to
advance development of this site for a downtown transit facility encountered problems relating to
the presence of contaminated soils; owner reluctance to pay for property clean-up; and property
' valuation issues. After a great deal of protracted negotiations bore no fruit the pursuit of this
property was dropped. The soil contamination problem not only increases the cost of developing
on this site, but it raises cost uncertainties associated with surrounding parcels. WSA has been
I asked to re examine the City's options for development of a downtown transit center located
somewhere in the two block area bounded by Monterey, Santa Rosa, Marsh and Toro Streets.
The northern of these two blocks was identified by the "Conceptual Physical Plan for the City's
Center" as the location fora parking/transportation use. WSA was asked to include provision of
up to a 250 space parking garage for all transit transfer center altematives.
A four phase work program is envisioned to identify the advantages and disadvantages of
alternative approaches to supporting transit needs in Downtown. This working paper describes
the findings of the Phase 1 effort. The Phase 1 effort and the other three subsequent work phases
fare as follows.
' 350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
IPagel - 1
o � �
N S
� W
J r �
w Um
a y N F K N co z
U_ y p C n
J U N `i 2 y LL U
U
; CL a � _ � a a m
O Q
W
r
y
W
1S l J V1NVS Z
gg W
zd
zp is Soso Q
- 0
�=IL1
P 1S OaaOW
?A N 1
z
Z ' v
N 1S
MONO N '
1S N302iVJ
N
d '
/ is arroae d
N '1S OWOdIN
1S HOV38
1S 73WaV0 '
O
J
O
z H
W
li. Y O N LU
Q
to d Q 1 R
u =EN Q W O } C}7 eWe N of
�s
=ELU
N N O N 2 ae H r N v a W a.
u�3 v d tQn u - a eo
r N vi Q �A �O 1- n m P
c:; �•■�
�' Z
N V g
_
= m
IL
a 0. s
IL
Ia c�CY V
ul
eg
N
Q
- �
O
_
ILW
J
_
I H
i
I
� W
o
l � N
IC
01sNIS
top
0 INTRODUCTION
PHASE 1 - CONSTRAINTS IDENTIFICATION AND PROGRAM REFINEMENT
The first phase of work would be to update the functional and physical requirements for a
downtown transportation center and to identify potential implementation constraints. City staff I
has chosen to title this project as the North Area Regional (Transit) Facility or NARF. This
acronym has been chosen to avoid confusion of other similarly names projects such as the:
DTC-Downtown Transfer Center located on-street at Osos Street near Palm Street, RTC —
Amtrak parking lot and SLORTA Bus Layover facility at Santa Barbara Street and High Street;
and the MMTC which is the original acronym for all eleven sites studies in 1993. Phase 1
consists of five subtasks. '
Task 1.1 - Review existing transit operations and determine if future transit operations will be
impacted(or improved)by constructing the NARF and relocation of the transit center to either of '
these two locations (blocks). Determine if current and future transit levels of service can be
maintained and will not be limited by site design at either of the two locations. WSA will meet
and discuss existing and planned transit services to define service support needs. WSA would I
then consider routing and bay capacity implications associated with each block.
Task 1.2 - WSA would describe the pros and cons of combine transit center and parking garage I
facilities.
Task 1.3 - WSA would coordinate with City staff contact with property owners to determine
their individual interest in selling their respective parcels. City staff would provide addresses of
owners and would draft the survey questionnaire.
Task I A — WSA would review the recent parking report prepared for the City and would I
describe potential benefits to adjacent property owners if a multi-story parking structure is
included as part of the NARF project.
Task 1.5 — WSA would include in the project report results of Hazmat studies provided by the
City for the candidate NARF sites.
PHASE.2 - DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES I
WSA would prepare site concept plans for the NARF for several candidate sites including
consideration for joint development and a parking structure. The feasibility of a joint use public
facility that includes the NARF (either on the bottom floor or in an open space area adjacent to)
and a multi-level public parking structure for each of the two proposed locations would be
investigated. The development of these concept plans would consider maximum buildout '
operations supportable by the NARF. This task would be performed in two steps. First, the
strengths and weaknesses of the candidate sites and parcels would be tested in order to gauge
preliminary development opportunities. The results of this viability assessment would be I
reviewed with staff in order to focus definition of the most interesting/promising sites /parcels.
The most promising would be developed in more detail,but still at the conceptual site plan level.
330760 '
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Pagel -2
f
INTRODUCTION
I PHASE 3 - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
Phase 3 is would evaluate the alternatives with respect of land use conflicts, costs and parking
needs.
Task 3.1 - WSA would identify potential land use conflicts if the NARF project goes forward
and existing land use/buildings stay in service around the site.
Task 3.2 - WSA would prepare conceptual cost estimates for construction elements and would
' include right-of-way estimates provided by the City for the alternative NARF concepts.
Task 3.3-WSA would estimate the number of parking spaces that may be provided for each of
' the alternative structure designs and an estimate of the construction cost per parking space for
each facility.
Task 3A-WSA would provide a qualitative description of the functionality of the transit center
for each alternative.
PHASE 4 - PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS
' A brief project report would be prepared summarizing the alternatives and their relative strengths
and weaknesses. The findings of this report would be presented to the City Council for
deliberation and decision.
REPORT ORGANIZATION
' Following this introductory section,this report is organized into six sections:
2. Review of Program Requirements;
' 3. Combined Parking Development Strategies;
4. Property Availability Survey Findings;
I5. Hazmat Study Findings;
6. Alternative Development Concepts; and
I7. Summary Evaluation.
I
I 350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WUSUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 1 -3
I
o � 1
Chapter 2 1
REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 1
The number of required bus loading positions (bays) is determined by the number of bus routes,
the dwell times for buses at the transit center, the degree to which buses can share loading 1
positions and passenger needs. Through routed lines typically need a loading position in each
direction whereas terminating lines only need one loading position if the end of line layover is
less than the frequency of service. Dwell times are typically three to five minutes for through 1
routed buses and ten to 15 minutes for terminating buses. Some end of line layovers can be
several hours during the midday period. Buses from more than one route can share loading 1
positions if they operate less frequently than the frequency of the timed transfer pulses. For
example, SLO Transit Routes 4 and 5 operate on 30-minute headways that suggest a possible
pulse every 30 minutes. Routes 1, 2, 3, and 6 however only operate on hourly headways and 1
therefore could not pulse every 30 minutes. Routes 1 and 3 therefore could share the same
loading position by making alternating 30-minute pulses. If the frequency of service on these
routes were increased in the futurethis bay sharing strategy would fail. A central issue 1
becomes do all bus routes need to pulse at the same time or can passenger transfer needs be
met with two or more different pulses? How many passengers are transferring downtown and
how reliable are the transfers being made? These issues were each reviewed to define bus 1
loading requirements.
BACKGROUND 1
The 1993 Regional Multi-Modal Transfer Center Preliminary Engineering Project developed a
program estimate for 13 to 14 bus bays and a minimum site size of one to two acres. The 1
program consisted of the following:
• SLO Transit, 6 bays 1
• Central Coast Area Transit, 6 bays
• Downtown Trolley, 1 bay 1
This program defines the desired objectives for bus operations and passenger convenience. It
was not intended to explore potential tradeoffs between bus operations/passenger convenience 1
and site availability/location.
SLO TRANSIT NEEDS 1
Existing and planned transit services were reviewed in order to determine the desired and also
the minimum number of required bus bays needed for the NARF. The minimum need considers 1
potential refinements or compromises to desired bus operations to fit as a good neighbor in the
downtown area.
1
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 2- 1
1
REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Number of Bus Routes
The City SLO Transit service presently operates with six bus routes, all of which serve both the
downtown and Cal Poly. The six routes actually operate as three route pairs.
I • Routes 1 and 3 serve the Broad and Orcutt southern corridor providing two-direction bus
service over inner portions of the shared routing. These routes both operate on hourly
headways.
• Routes 2 and 6 serve the South Higuera corridor providing two-direction bus service over
the inner portions of the shared routing. These routes also both operate on hourly
headways.
• Routes 4 and 5 each operate one direction around a large loop,together providing two-
direction bus service over the entire loop route. These routes both operate on 30-minute
Ifrequencies.
The SLO Transit service is somewhat unusual in that all routes serve the same two major
' passenger destinations — downtown and Cal Poly. This routing concept is rare for bus systems
that operate coordinated timed transfer pulse service. With all routes serving both major
passenger destinations, few passenger transfers would be expected.
The nature of class schedules at Cal Poly probably argues for buses on all routes to arrive and
depart around school"bell time"schedules.
Review of the 1997 Short Range Transit Plan for SLO Transit indicates that no major expansions
in service are presently planned. Six bus loading positions plus a bay.for the Downtown Trolley
' therefore would fully accommodate future as well as current-needs even if all routes pulsed at the
same time.
' Operations Needs
If coordinated timed transfer schedule service is desired where passengers form all six routes
' could transfer at a single pulse, than six bus bays would be required for SLO Transit buses. This
admittedly would see some buses running"nose to tail"between downtown and Cal Poly where
several routes overlap. For example,Routes 3,4 and 6 all would run in a bunch leaving Cal Poly
along Grand and Mill Streets until downtown where the routes begin to separate: Another
option, alternating pulse option, would be to pulse only one route of each of the three paired
routes. The alternating pulse operations option would require only four bays, recognizing that
IRoutes 4 and 5 operate every 30 minutes.
During a typical hour 12 buses pass through the downtown transfer center. Several other bus
trips sometime are added during peak morning hours in order to provide adequate passenger
capacity. These"tandem"trips are added to the basic routes.
Figure 3 summarizes the present hourly schedule for City buses. Five of the 12 hourly bus trips
are scheduled to dwell five minutes at Osos Street, one dwells four minutes, three dwell three
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
' Page 2-2
0 0 �
M V
.d
Q %0 LL W
I I I I i
.j 1
O I Ln 5t
N V
I I i I I
oWt W
I I
I I I I
OC O h
0~C d
O
Z I Ln to
O II I I I � ~
N _I. W
m I F
O I I y
O H 1i h
.j O
I I I
Z I ! h
Ln O QZQ 1
I eh = 02
I I
~ O
N
I I I I ! I O W
ch
I I I
Q
I I I I I W
N
i I I
I I I
I
I I O
N
I i i I I I I
I I i Ln
� I �
i I I I I
i i I i
I I i I O
I I I
Uj
m
m m m
in
Z co 1
co cc cc go Z of Z vmi vmi W Z Z Z vmi
N N C) cn < -&n �O %0 Oil
\r%0 1
I
REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
minutes, two dwell two minutes and one leaves as soon as it unloads and loads passengers.
Recognizing that buses generally run one to three minutes late, most City buses spend little time
' at Osos Street. For example, the twelve bus trips per hour are scheduled to occupy Osos Street
space for only 42 minutes (number of total minutes for all SLO Transit buses). Thus in theory
one bus loading position could serve all twelve bus trips with an occupancy rate of 70 percent
I (42 minutes divided by 60 minutes/hour). In practice more than one bay would be required to
support 12 buses loading per hour. According to the schedule the maximum number of SLO
Transit buses that should be at the Osos Street transfer center at the same time is four buses at
I fifty minutes after the hour. The absence of a readily identifiable pulse in this schedule is due
largely to bus loading capacity limitations on Osos Street.
I Passenger Needs
The most recent passenger transfer information available from the 1997 Short Range Transit
Plan indicates that 75 percent of all passenger trips are to/from Cal Poly and only six percent
' to/from downtown. Only three percent of passengers indicated that they access the bus stop by
transferring to another bus. If another three percent transferred to another bus when leaving the
surveyed bus this would yield a total of only six percent transfer uassenLers — a very low
percentage. Allowing for response biases would still suggest a transfer rate less than ten percent.
I CCAT NEEDS
Central Coast Area Transit(CCAT) service was reviewed through their published schedules and
I1996-2016 Long Range Public Transit Pl m.
Number of Bus Routes
' Figures 4 and 5 describe 1996 service and anticipated service for 2016. Figure 4 indicates four
basic regional service corridors leading into San Luis Obispo:
1.Highway 101 North—Santa Margarita, Atascadero,Templeton, and Paso Robles (8-11
daily roundtrips);
2.Highway 101 South—Arroyo Grande and Nipomo(4-7 daily roundtrips);
3.Route 1 North—Cuesta College and Morro Bay(841 daily roundtrips); and
4.Los Osos Valley Rd—Baywood/Los Osos (4-7 daily roundtrips).
Whether buses serving these four corridors are through routed or terminate in San Luis Obispo
they would each require no more than one bus loading position each, or four total bays. The
' graphic suggests that between 24 and 36 daily bus trips were made to and from San Luis Obispo
by regional buses in 1996.
eCurrently CCAT operates five routes to downtown San Luis Obispo:
• Route 7 serves Los Osos via Cuesta College;
f • Route 8 serves Morro Bay via Cuesta College;
• Route 9 serves San Miguel via Paso Robles and Atascadero;
330760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 2-3
o
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY '
Oalc Shores •. Saa Miguet
Herttaga
fur! • Past Robles Mumapal Aupo J
iSNaAassenger:Service)
T I
San Simeon Shandon: " 1
•� Paso Robt : " �..
Paso:Rohles'.00MmunIW
68;800ftrderslAnnaall /4nea'Frensit�Secvice
Templet 6T.000.R.'eders/Annually
rias _
7j.7C R ideWAnrvualty
catlaro'" calitral:Coast Area Transit .
`276000 Aiders/Annually... '
Cayucos
41.300 Riders/Annual .`;"CueSteifDllege ::: . ria;Margadta`
Morro Bay
S!_O Transit
Baywood Park/Los Osce 1:023.00F}'Ftrders/Anr�ally I
San
21,800.Riders4 rfaualry
Regional Route Transit ; O Cdurrty Airport I
1 -3 Round Trips/Day `�_ 0D 23a0PassengerslAnnvally
f, 4-7 Round Trips/Day ` �. .� South•Comty'Acea'Trans.
Pismo Beaeh " "`' ` ' 98 UOb•Riders>Annuapy" '
8-11 Round Trips/Day Grande ,
Grover Beach
Ocean
r
O Local Fixed Routes .N mo
" i y
Oceans K t•
(No Passenger "ivies).
Dial-A-Ride Services
• tea.
Subsidized Taxi
RUNABOUT
Senior Vans Note: The Regional Dial-A-Ride System
(RUNABOUT) Covers the Entire Region N
Railroad with Door-To-Door Service Miles /►
Airports 0 s 10
I
Figure 4
1996 TRANSIT SERVICES AVAILABLE IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
`
�► Y A VALBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES =r60\M.+�rsW I
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY
I - - - .- - - - - - - - - - -•- - -•- - - - - - - - - -�
'Oak Staores( ; San•itAiguei '•':. I
' Hentage Paso Roble6 I
',�. .MumcipaFAtU�port- .l
S Simeon 1r S don i
'
Peso Griesta£ollege Extension i
RDbmI (Looaton is be-determmed� l..
��. Tem�lefoa .
t Cambria •r �s"���f�+� W
l '
. scaderv-
Cayucos
CLes�a Ccl►ege ;pl�a�
Morro Bay 11
' Baywood Parkn os Osos
Regional Route Transit c+ Sari:.tiris'Obispo:
4-7 Round Trips/Day
L $LO031; yAi1*rt
' 8-11 Round Trips/Day
�.
' 12 or More Round Trips/Day �,:.�• - ,� -
Possible Future Service Piano Beach
Grover Beach •3wde ...
Oceano
Local Fixed Routes
Senior Vans OcearyD
Subsidized Taxi F�r•,-— i
' Dial-A-Ride Services i
Commuter Railroad Miles �( N
�. Airports o s io A
Figure 5
2016 PROJECTED TRANSIT SERVICES AVAILABLE IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
Y YtJ I WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 350760JiG 54n°100
I
1
REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
a Route 10 serves Santa Maria and Nipomo; and '
e Route 11 serves Baywood/Los Osos via Los Osos Valley Road. In essence Route 7 is a
branch version of Route 8. t
All of these bus routes serve Cal Poly except Route 8 which passes near it on Foothill Boulevard
and California Boulevard. It is unlikely that Cal Poly passengers would ride past this '
intersection to transfer downtown to another bus route serving Cal Poly. Thus, connecting
CCAT bus routes to Cal Poly through the downtown transfer facility does not appear to be an
important function for the downtown transit center. Distribution of CCAT passengers to other
non Cal Poly locations within the SLO Transit service area however would be an important
function. Table 1 summarizes the frequency of service provided by CCAT to downtown San
Luis Obispo.
Table 1
CCAT SERVICE BUS TRIPS TO DOWNTOWN
Danv 7AMTo9AM
Route Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures '
Route 7 6 5 2 1
Route 8 6 8 2 1
Route 9 14 14 4 3 '
Route 10 5 5 3 1
Route 11 1 1 1 0
Total 32 32 12 6 '
These service frequencies are consistent with the frequencies described by the Long Range Plan
in 1996 except, Route 9 serving the Highway 101 North corridor is operating a little more '
frequent and Route 11 serving the Los Osos Valley Road corridor is substantially less frequent
than shown for 1996.
Operations Needs
Unlike SLO Transit service, CCAT does not operate uniform service frequencies (i.e. every 30 '
minutes or hour). Nine of the 12 scheduled arrivals occur between 7 am and 8 am and seven
occur between 7:30 and 8:00 am. In general inbound or arriving regional buses which are off
loading passengers require less dwell time than originating or pulsing buses. CCAT's afternoon '
peak service, which has more originating bus trips at Osos Street, tends to be less concentrated
than its morning service and therefore less demanding for space.
If all corridor bus services were pulsed four bays would be needed to serve CCAT passenger
needs. End of the line bus parking/storage needs are not included in this estimate. It appears
possible for CCAT buses to pulse 15 minutes offset from the SLO Transit pulse. The 15-minute '
offset would slightly increase travel times for passengers to SLO Transit, but it would increase
the certainty of making the connection and not missing the bus. The latter is extremely
important for transfer connections to infrequent service.
350760 '
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 2-4
REVIEW OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
' Figure 5 describes for 2016 the same four regional 1996 bus service corridors. Frequencies are
anticipated to increase to approximately only on the Highway 101 South corridor, increasing
from 47 daily trips to more than 12 daily trips. With the same number of corridors the same
number of bus bays should suffice.
The foregoing analysis ignores the need to provide schedule recovery and driver rest time at the
end of each trip. Typically 10 percent of the one way nu mng time or a minimum of ten minutes
is provided for longer distance regional bus trip for the purposes of schedule recovery and driver
' rest. Only Route 7 and 8 regularly terminate at Osos Street and might layover between
scheduled trips at this location.
SUMMARY
The small size of downtown blocks and the difficulty finding a large size lot suggests that first
' priority use for limited site space should be for active bus loading and passenger needs. Should
space be limited on-site, dwell times for buses longer than ten minutes might best be
accommodated at a nearby site or curb frontage. From a bus operations standpoint a dedicated
bay for each route would be desirable. This translates to six bays for SLO Transit, one for the
downtown trolley and four for CCAT. If space for eleven bays cannot be found, nine would be
workable if SLO Transit operated on an alternating pulse schedule. If CCAT bus pulses could be
slotted between SLO Transit pulses, six bays might be made to work — one downtown trolley,
and five shared SLO Transit/CCAT bays. The latter six bay facilities would not easily allow
flexibility to restructure the present SLO Transit one way loop routing system nor increasing
headways to 30 minutes for all routes. An enhanced passenger information system would be
needed to support this constrained operations strategy and space would need to be found to park
' CCAT buses midday at a location offsite.
What are the implications of the alternative programs for number of bus bays? The Monterey to
' Higuera block is approximately 225 feet in width and could accommodate three bus-loading bays
per driveway aisle. The Higuera to .Marsh block is about 270 feet in width and also could
accommodate about three bus loading positions per aisle. If non-independent operations are
' accepted this could be increased to four bays per aisle. Non independent operations are
conditions where buses do not have full ability to arrive and depart,but must sometimes wait for
another bus to depart first. Thus, site plan concepts with bus aisles running across the width of
the Monterey to Higuera block would require four bus aisles to provide 11 loading bays, three
aisles to provide_9 bays and two circulation aisles to provide six bays. The longer Higuera to
Marsh block would require three bus aisle to provide 9 or 11 bays and two aisle to provide six
bays.
Obviously,the more bays provided at the transit center the greater the flexibility to accommodate
' unforeseen future service expansions and alternative operations strategies. In conclusion, the
City should shoot for eleven bus bays but could live with nine. At a bare-bones level six would
suffice but would mean substantial operational compromises.
I 550760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY.STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 2 -5
o
Chapter 3
COMBINED TRANSIT CENTER PARKING GARAGE
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Partnership or joint development of a parking garage or lot element integrated into a transit '
center project has been suggested as a means of addressing downtown parking needs and
attracting parking revenue funding to assist with the cost of site acquisition and development. '
The pros and cons associated with a joint project as well as benefits to adjacent property owners
were explored
1
PARKING NEEDS
The Parking & Downtown Access Plan prepared in 1997 provides the most comprehensive and 1
recent information on parking needs downtown and near the study blocks. The Concept Plan for
parking envisions consolidation of the multiple disperse surface parking in multi-level parking '
structures located in the periphery of the Commercial Core. The Marsh Street Parking
Expansion project was considered a baseline "given" for the parking plan. The plan itself calls
for the construction of two additional new parking structures and the planning for a possible third 1
structure as demands reach specified thresholds. The Palm Street II garage was specifically
mentioned for initiation of design work. One of the policies of the parking plan is to avoid the
use of eminent domain with the City seeking site acquisition opportunities when sites become '
available. The other locations suggested for new parking structures are the area near the Fremont
Theater (which could include sites east.of Santa Rosa Street) and the Well Fargo site near
Nipomo Street(see Figure 6). Revenue associated with the sale of surface lots could be used to
fimd these new parking structures.
Casual review of existing parking conditions east of Santa Rosa Street, suggest that ample '
parking presently exist. The Bank of America parking lot for example is used by paratransit
vehicle parking. Development of County offices or development on one of the two study sites
could quickly change this excess parking condition as could the closure of central area surface '
parking lots. Looking back at the City's 1977 parking study report to understand local parking
behavior indicates that average walking distances in San Luis Obispo for parking were about 300
feet for non-work trips and 400 feet for work trips. In Santa Barbara averages were 400 feet for
non work and 600 feet for work trips. These somewhat dated figures probably suggest that most
parkers would not walk more than two blocks for non work trips and perhaps three blocks for
work trips in San Luis Obispo. The traffic presence of Santa Rosa Street would also tend to '
discourage people from walking across it to reach destinations west of Santa Rosa Street.
Thus a parking structure or lot located midblock or towards Toro Street would probably '
effectively service parker destinations east of Osos Street and perhaps very limited parker service
towards Morro Street. It could help serve the County Complex. Such a facility could help
support intensification of development on the two study blocks and blocks adjacent to them.
350760 '
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 3-1
1
N
4 y7
Fmm�,
�+A.��7yplp�p [Ft LTi
RUI
�IIA
b [eve
• f���i �I�i M,-
19;
A
41 01
.. v rt i,hi[{�� �� 4 H r �.. M •
•
•
r L
11
•
Z
yt1 i tN:7a`e lilt, �. t
� s.G •
COMBINED TRANSIT CENTER PARKING GARAGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
PHYSICAL VIABILITY
The most cost efficient type of parking structure is what is known as a sloping floor design
where parking is accommodated on the gently sloping ramps. These design types need sites
about 130 feet or more in width and 250 feet or more in length. Regardless of the garage type
the minimum width is about 130 feet. Surface lots can function with 65 feet or more in width.
The block between Monterey and Higuera Streets is approximately 225 feet in length and the
block between Higuera and Marsh is approximately 270 feet in length.
Review of City zoning requirements for the two block.area indicates the blocks are both zoned
C-R(Retail-Commercial). This zoning limits heights to 45 feet and allows 100 percent coverage
of the site (no setback requirements). Height is defined to include the vertical distance between
the average ground under the building to the topmost point of the roof. In the case of a parking
structure this could be construed to be either the upper deck parking wall height or.lighting. This
restriction would appear to allow a four story parking structure:
Ground level—zero to 15 ft.
Second level- 15 to 25 ft.
Third level-25 to 35 R
Fourth level-35 to 45 ft.
H built over a transit center, either over the entire center or portions of the center, the ground
floor would need to be about 25 feet up in order to minimise noise and air quality problems.
Column spacing for parking structures typically is 65 providing a clear span over an entire '
parking aisle. Transit centers typically have aisle modules of 75 feet for sawtooth bays and 60
feet for parallel curb bays. The block length between Monterey and Higuera Streets lends itself I
most efficiently to sawtooth bus bays and thus 75 foot column spacings. The longer block
between Higuera and Marsh could accommodate parallel bus bays and the more compatible 60 to
65 foot column spacing.
Most joint parking transit center facilities involve the transit center being located along side of
the parking structure. A few facilities have been constructed with the parking garage located
above the transit center.
TRANSIT CENTER PASSENGER IMPLICATIONS
The 1993 Study addressing multi-modal transfer center needs raised a number of concerns
regarding air rights development above a transit center. Enclosed transit centers tend to provide I
noisy and polluted air quality environments for passengers to wait for buses. With San Luis
Obispo's superb climate, it to would appear to be inconsistent with a transitlalternative modes
first policy to relegate transit passengers to a second class environment. Boulder Colorado has
constructed an air-rights parking structure over its transit center, but its climate can be more
severe than San Luis Obispo's. Many transit centers have been constructed aside a parking
garage including: Anchorage; Tacoma; and Des Moines. On small sites conflicts arise between
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 3-2
I
COMBINED TRANSIT CENTER PARKING GARAGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
Ibus circulation and parking garage driveways and ramps. While difficult and less desirable, air
rights construction has been done elsewhere successfully.
' COST AND FUNDING IMPLICATIONS
I According to the 1997 Parking Study the cost of a structured space averages $15,000 with a site
cost of$35 per square foot. Surface spaces might be expected to have the same cost for site
space ($35 per square foot), but to have a construction cost of perhaps $2,500 per space. Usage
' of parking funds to acquire the site would appear equitable as long as the site effectively satisfies
parking needs. On a per acre basis the 1997 Study estimate of$35 per square foot would equate
to approximately $1.5 million. As shown in Figure 7, when land costs increase to around $40
Iper square foot four to five level garages become cost effective parking solutions.
The 1993 Multi-Modal Transfer Center Study identified a site acquisition cost of$3.2 million for
' the Toyota/Dean Whitter site. This cost translates to approximately $75 per square foot (1993
dollars). This 1993 site acquisition figure included a large degree of contingency, and was not
designed to be a market assessment value.
SUMMARY
A minimum footprint of 130 feet by 250 feet would be required for an efficient parking garage.
Its access driveways would need to be located not to interfere with transit center driveways. The
location of the Shell Station and the Bank of America preclude the parking garage from being
located along Santa Rosa Street and the transit center would need to be located midblock. This
relegates the parking structure to the Tom Street side of the study area, which is somewhat
remote from desired destinations for parkers.
I '
I.
' 350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 3-3
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY
Total Parking Development Costs/Space
i
i
$50,000
j
W
1
`o $40.000
C zee
Ge
OR $30,000 e
J W rgro
c:
NZeMCrsstsSeG
!N. e
� I
i
m 10Mm $20.000 i
C.
V(0 f
a �
�
m
CL
v $10,000 '
0
r
$0
$0 $25 $50 $75 $100 $125 $150 '
Land Cost(Dollars per Square Foot)
Patidng Parking Development Development
Faclllty Efficiency1 . Cosf per Cost tthout t
Type Sq4 FfAt' Sq Ft : Land,
Surface Lot I 33or $8.00 $2,600
Above-ground Garage 380 $40.00 j $14,400 '
Underground Garage 360 $80.00 1 $28,800
Note: Development costs include construction,engineering,financral and legal fees,insurance
during construction,debt service reserve and capitil¢ed interest during construction. Casts are
19%dollars.
F&MRS
t111111111IN Figure 7
``n�I/' PARKING DEVELOPMENT COSTS PER SPACE
Y A WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES 35076WIG 7-6/28/00
Chapter 4
PROPERTY OWNER SURVEY FINDINGS
The City of San Luis Obispo staff conducted a survey of property owners for the two block study
area in May 2000. Owners were asked what they envisioned their use for their property in the
near and long term and what their acceptance would be to sell property to the City. Three of the
six owners responded to the survey(see Figure 6):
• Westside Auto at the corner of Monterey and Toro;
• Clinton Properties for the former Spring Toyota site along Higuera Street; and
• RKE Properties II most of the block bounded by Marsh,Toro,Higuera and Santa Rosa.
Responses are summarized in Table 2. For the most part, none of the three responding owners
appeared eager to sell their property. Westside Auto and Clinton Properties however indicated a
willingness to consider selling if the price was attractive.
Our understanding is that the Shell Station between Monterey and Higuera Streets would be
expensive to acquire and would result in the loss of significant tax revenues.
On the block bounded by Santa Rosa Street, Higuera Street, Toro Street and Marsh Street the
Bank of America parcel and the historic hospital site were eliminated by the City council for use
as a site for the NARF.
' =760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
' Page 4- 1
Q'
a.
a
0
tr] I
� I
d '
g
as
y
e
ti
a
Na �
� o
z z _ '
m P
Z.5 Z° z Y Z
�F Fx y X
c ym
g
I �
Z Z° Z Z Z RI
g 3
ar bgm � 3a�; n
e � a xs She o � s4,
m i
w a r
Notes:
(a)RKE Properties is partially owned by Rob Rossi.In subsequent discussions with Mr.Rossi he has indicated that
he has long-term plans for development in this area and that a paridng structure—either public or private-would be
needed to obtain the necessary parkirig for the density that he envisions. City staff will investigate this issue in more
depth and will forward any new information,if any,to WSA when available.
Westside
Amin Parts
Adler WEB"Jr.
CHidn Bbeiar
StEMEWd i3r.
F400M
MEE
Pnperties 11
RKE
Propatim I[
RKE
Prquties]a
Chapter 5
HAZMAT STUDY FINDINGS I
The City of San Luis Obispo commissioned SECOR International Incorporated to prepare an
Environmental Transaction Screening report for the two block study area. This assessment did
not include any new surveys, but relied instead on available data. Thus, many unknowns
continue to exist regarding possible soil contamination on the two study blocks. More detailed '
Phase II surveys would be needed to better determine the presence, type and extent of possible
contamination. Once the nature and extent of the contamination is known a remediation plan can
be developed and costed. Contents of the SECOR transmittal letter, site maps, transaction screen
questionnaire, historical maps, regulatory agency correspondence and Vista Report are provided
in Appendix A for interpretation by the reader. More detailed information was available for the
former Spring Toyota site than for other parcels.
To a layman the report appears to indicate that 1144 Higuera Street has been remediated. 1144
Higuera Street is the western portion of the former Spring Toyota parcels nearest the Shell
Station. 1166 Higuera Street, the eastern of the two parcels comprising the former Spring
Toyota property, has been recommended for capping with an asphalt surface. 1166 Higuera
Street would most likely required remediation should a building structure be proposed for
construction. Even long term use as a parking lot or transit center under City ownership would
probably mean remediation of the site. Properties along Monterey Street boarding the former
Spring Toyota site would also probably exhibit contaminated soil problems to some unknown
extent. This is also true of properties between Higuera and Marsh Streets. More detailed Phase
II surveys would be needed to determine remediation plans and their associated costs.
The 1993 Multi-Modal Transfer Center Study proposed construction on 1144 Higuera, the
western portion of 1166 Higuera and the Dean Whitter site. Except for lighting standards and
shelters no structures were proposed, which seemingly might allow compliance with the
directive for asphalt capping of 1166 Higuera Street. The plan did propose to employ concrete
rather than asphalt paving, since concrete holds up better for high volumes of heavy buses. It is
also questionable whether the soil contamination is a condition that the City wants to accept over
a long period of time and whether State and Federal agencies would be willing to invest
transportation funds to construct improvements over.
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY VALBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 5- 1
I
i
Chapter 6
' ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
I Many different ways exist to configure a transit center on portions of the two study blocks.
Functional.needs and implementation ease were the two primary site planning factors considered
in developing alternative site concept plans. Functional needs considerations included bus
turning dimension requirements, traffic safety,pedestrian accessandsecurity, traffic circulation,
and bus operational objectives. Implementation ease considered parcel boundaries, parcel
ownership and cost unknowns. Good neighbor land use and other factors were also considered.
Where possible, opportunities to develop a new parking facility were provided for in the
individual site concepts.
I Eight site concept plans were defined including the 1993 site development plan. The 1993 site
concept plan (Site Concept A) would be very functional even if it were to be trimmed from 13
bays to only nine (nine being the recommended minimum) bus loading bays. The other seven
' site concepts are:
• Site Concept B—Compressed Site Plan
' • Site Concept C—Shell Station Site
• Site Concept D=Hybrid Plan
• Site Concept E—Higuera Street Short Transit Mall
• Site Concept F—Higuera Street Transit Mall
' • Site Concept G—Marsh/Higuera Transit Center
• Site Concept H—Marsh/Higuem Three Aisle Transit Center
SITE CONCEPT A— 1993 MMTC PLAN
' The 1993 proposed MMTC Plan, sometimes referred to as the "Spring Toyota Site Plan,"
provided for two 2-direction bus aisles and one single direction aisle designated for passenger
drop-offs and the trolley. It provided a total of 13 bus loading positions just east of the Shell
I Station. It would leave the Westside Auto Parts property untouched, but would take the Dean
Whitter parcels, 1144 Higuera and part of 1166.11iguera Street. The 1993 plan assumed that
acquisition of the successful Shell Station would be expensive and also would eliminate a good
source of tax revenue for the City and thus avoided its acquisition. The location of the Shell
IStation at the busy comer of Monterey and Santa Rosa Streets also complicated safe access
to/firm the required number of driveways needed to serve the 13 bay transit center.
A new bus actuated traffic signal would be needed on Monterey Street to permit buses in the
central aisleway to tum left onto Monterey Street The bus bays would be shallow sawtooth
design in order to facilitate independent bus entry and exit from each individual bay.
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
' Page 6• 1
os
Q 4R
T0{LO S11.
m ". _ -r:'_ '" ,,•rte... _�� .
O i >� ,.. x✓ :� '� N .� T >. a �- '
i _•� I f' jr 1
ra
6, 'i
} y(s
� ^. t''� W?W+6r.y •. YTf l.'^ '.Lf IC'...: C tll...
fir '
��++..•+ yr
•h i'-..: ='� � •may. ! ''�• :. sw{t ..'g'+-- t
191
µ
t -
.tH.0 uA. i...._,a. .1.�. , Y i ..ef�'M4. s•
:._�w+. ��.• r- Vie.� { i ,k-'�---�: (T t, 4W
MN`NY�
r�ryuttzmftWN.
k. n
.+t rl ;♦ r,. �j,@ �-ay..;,..lir.v'g �" , y r
t - _d e.� ar� S7r✓ w .6. 2
J
<�=SANiA ROSH ST
1
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
IA small parking lot could be developed near Toro Street or the Westside Auto use could
continue. Alternatively a parking structure might possibly be constructed on the unused eastern
' parcels. This site is very small for a garage and dimensions would need to be less than desired.
SITE CONCEPT B —COMPRESSED SITE
The 1993 plan could be trimmed back to nine bus loading positions by eliminating the aisle for
the passenger drop-off and trolley,by converting one of the two northbound direction aisles to a
' single direction and by narrowing passenger platforms. This would reduce the required transit
center width from 190 feet to 115 feet and avoid the need to take any of 1166 Higuera Street.
The downtown trolley and passenger drop-off could occur along the curb frontage.
IThe portion of the site east of the transit center could be developed into a parking facility. The
225 foot block width from Monterey to Higuera Street could efficiently provide for three 70 foot
' parking aisles. The 1993 transit center concept left approximately 114 feet of block length
between the Transit Center and Toro Street. This distance is generally too short to construct an
' efficient parking garage using standard parking stall dimensions. The trimmed down nine bus
facility would leave 158 feet of length, which is an efficient area to develop a staggered floor
parking structure. A four level garage located on the eastern end of the block could
' accommodate approximately 300 cars. If the third and fourth levels were cantilevered over the
transit center about 450 cars could be parked, but cantilevered structures are much more
expensive.
' A new bus actuated traffic signal would be needed on Monterey to facilitate timely bus
departures. Otherwise buses departing onto Monterey Street would be forced to turn right only
' for safety.
SITE CONCEPT C -SHELL STATION SITE
Concept C would develop the transit center on the present site of the Shell Station. It would
setback or move the northbound curbface of Santa Rosa Street and would alio_w three buses to
' load along this recessed curb. A two direction bus aisle would provide loading for three buses in
each direction and a tenth bus could be effectively loaded along the Higuera Street curb. Thus,
loading for ten buses could be accommodated. Buses exiting the NARF onto Monterey Street
' would be forced to turn right for traffic safety reasons. The entire eastern portion of the block
would be free to develop additional parking if desired or allow for more intensified
redevelopment. The roughly 271 foot length of this potential development parcel could support
an efficient sloping floor garage design and would have ample frontage for parking structure
driveway access.
Bus loading would employ sawtooth bays, which afford independent entry and exit for buses.
=760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMUH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
IPage 6-2
o t
�5
OS
G%
= O.
O v
Na OW
Q npe�Ay„ .. .]' '• It f t k' J3�'-• '`�[{ 4 V
O MMS 1'-•'��,.1 v...+c s.•.. <`'� ( S"t,s. -^tel'+-+_1���T.: '
.i µ I � i. � I x1•it'I��nYte•y<� ,�a'' ,y� + a
a
.f
,.$` Y �{"�}'- 6I I � I.nF `^ � �• xfi Pte' 1, n";''•'�'
3 ..�.. �' :•6�i �"Kx,,,s .kit p l.{{F � t „S,
��,,.,+n.-�, :Li ),y,�.•,sttr]t".+i+s.w-1•.; '.:, .ci
I
•S�� ' TY."1r` +uL.��P.q,F C ' Tr•'i{� i TF�..LY4 � �µ
Oi .? + ��J\ psi e`r,Fi ��i � r •...n .Ilk' ?
s T
� 1 I
t l tK 2 E
1 a
5-2
aS'' I
v ^Cru e
+ro" hRF 'S°�':'«"r-•r „_ r"'-3'a...3+ 4
SANTA ROSH
-.r
1
'6
a
W
f rr.iw a
09
it W� i
T _w^ �•'
CE
n4.1 '1 c 6 Y
IR-
J l! y ppp
� � •' �S �I I �' i J 4
ry
} I 1
O
z
Q2 � 3
<....
SANTA ROSA ST • I "'
C C
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
SITE CONCEPT D — HYBRID PLAN I
The Hybrid Plan, Concept D, avoids the need to acquire the Dean Whitter Building. It would
acquire the related surface parking lot between the Dean Whitter Building, acquire1144 Higuera I
Street and acquire the Shell Station. It would provide for loading five buses in the transit center
aisle and four buses along adjacent curbfaces. In theory, the entire eastern portion of the block
could be developed into a parking garage. In practice, however, if the City acquired the entire '
block the site design constraint imposed by the Dean Whitter Building would not be an issue and
a more efficient site design (Concept B) could be developed. In order to safely exit left turning.
buses onto Monterey Street a bus only traffic signal would be needed. I
SITE CONCEPT E — HIGUERA STREET SHORT TRANSIT MALL
Concept E would close Higuera Street to general traffic between Toro and Santa Rosa Streets
and convert this street segment into a transit mall. The Conceptual Plan for Downtown
suggested that Higuera Street should be de-emphasized and closed between Toro and Johnson
Streets. The idea of a transit mall therefore is somewhat consistent with the Downtown Plan.
Key issues include property access driveways and the transition points at the Santa Rosa and I
Toro Street intersections.
Property would need to be acquired along the north side of Higuera Street (about 40 feet.in '
depth). This property acquisition would include a portion of the Shell Station which portion
presently has no pumps or auto servicing facilities. Acquisition of 1144 Higuera Street frontage
would also be required. Access to the remaining portion of 1144 Higuera Street would need to '
be provided from 1166 Higuera Street The site concept plan requires some transfer passengers
to cross Higuera Street in order to make transfers. This transfer feature suggests that it would be
very undesirable to allow general traffic to use this segment
Ten bus bays are provided by Concept E, seven eastbound and three westbound bays. Bus bays
would be of the parallel type rather than the sawtooth design, with two bus routes sharing a I
tandem loading station. The parallel bus loading bays require less width, and therefore provide a
better fit with the available site area south of the Shell Station Building. The first bus to arrive
uses the front position and the second bus pulls in behind it With tandem loading, the second
bus must wait for the first bus to depart before it can exit the transit center.
Ample opportunity would exist to develop a parking lot or structure on the remainder of the
block, but access to this parking would need to be from Toro or Monterey Streets. A new traffic
signal would likely be required at the Toro and Monterey intersection.
It would be necessary to close the Higuera Street traffic access to both the Shell Station and 1144
Higuera Street, and desirable to close Higuem Street access to both the Bank of America parking
lot, and 1166 Higuera Street The Toro and Higuera Street intersection is relatively low volume I
and should be simple to configure a safe transition for the transit mall. The Santa Rosa Street
transition intersection however would be more complicated. Desirably buses northbound on '
Santa Rosa Street would tum right and use the curb loading bays along Higuera Street and
southbound buses would turn left into the northernmost bus aisle and load at these bays.
350760 '
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOMMS
FINAL REPORT
Page 6-3
� 6$
V O$
� amr
S�
O O. .
Ir Y ri
+
FSi1•+T`�G
',Lvas r � •+tt-:,�.^4.�:YF a -'x Y y.'.i
3 r q� � �.
mel
t .-�� � � 1 �f F w a r,� .�•- i
� 'CL�'Yi ' YA, ✓� yyV ''L:i'�1rL=�`� 4, "I
I r
I K
L..El J
.F�. ��• Y.� �:t.M,cam., �. .`•' �! ..
l
Y bi6aL.k' '�
u
1
�,
' � .+ r }S�K >—a–:•NST i•^v"�1'-k,{e e
I 5
� r, i .. i'�r. ^'4*-'r'n��i�:.� K�, �'v-�""t"� '' n."t��• I t!1
u - ... ��i'p7. 4 f'!'• r �{ry L..iv :31 % I O
H to z r � SANTA ROSA ST
I
o
g �."�qe�'/ AS�fTi 4 F -r't.�Ktw���•'-' y� +.Y� ,�"'��'�L
�.
'7 `. 1�.. " !`• `' 'wry^.'..Cs ., ^a7
Y - AYT"
t h,
4.1
CI '
yy.�•
�43 .a
Mt
MON
S Ler? '1
� 'KED i'F-'� t- ��arsp• �. + ��
• � E
c.rra =;.�++A..v�'� c"�'="�=a:+..__ •t•.:A7N0 r `� ', x
�'} � � :.;: ;SAMA ROSA ST � �'•!°""P
I
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
SITE CONCEPT F — HIGUERA STREET TRANSIT MALL
Concept F would utilize the entire block between Santa Rosa and Toro Streets for a transit
I center. Rather than locating the transit center on the street itself like Concept E, Concept F
locates it along the northern edge of the street and maintains two lanes of general traffic flow on
the street. It would use parallel type bus loading bays in order to minimize width requirements
' and it would provide up to twelve loading bays. This is three more than the recommended
minimum requirement and one more than the recommended"desired." Development of Concept
F would require acquisition of parts of the Shell Station property, 1144 Higuera Street parcel and
the 1166 Higuera Street parcel. Higuera Street intersections with both Santa Rosa and Toro
Streets would be complicated. At the lower volume Toro Street intersection, buses could be
delayed by southbound general traffic stopping at the Higuera Street intersection and blocking
the bus exit driveway. At the busy Santa Rosa intersection, right turning general traffic from
Higuera Street northbound to Santa Rosa Street would conflict with bus movements (not unlike
conditions found at nearside bus stops), but complicated by the bus left turn movement from
Santa Rosa Street. The passenger loading center platform is not sufficiently wide enough to
permit buses to make U turns on Higuera Street.
1 A large parking garage could potentially be developed on the remaining parcels.
SITE CONCEPT G— MARSH/HIGUERA TRANSIT CENTER
Concept G would develop a two aisle transit center oriented north-south midblock between
Marsh and Higuera Streets where the Bank of America surface parking lot presently exist. Only
eight bus bays could be provided with this plan, which is one less than desired. Both bus aisles
are oriented northward due to the orientation of the Marsh and Higuera one way street system.
This northbound only circulation pattern in the transit center would require southbound buses to
loop through the transit center, first turning left from Santa Rosa onto Marsh Street then left into
the site,left onto Higuera Street and then left back onto Santa Rosa Street.
Unlike several of the other concepts, it would not be possible to establish additional bus stops
along street curbs. Bus doors are on the right side and the traffic flow direction of Marsh and
Higuera Streets would force transfer passengers to cross a busy roadway if stops were
established along the curbs. It was beyond the scope of this project to recommend traffic patter
changes (i.e., changing one-way to two-way) to either Iiiguera or Marsh Streets. The eight bus
1 loading positions would be the tandem parallel curb type with semi independent operating
capabilities. Sufficient width exists to employ sawtooth design bus bays, but the parallel bays
are suggested in order to maximize surface parking potential near the hospital.
Surplus area could be developed with about 60 spaces east of the transit center in a surface lot
and perhaps 250 spaces in a new structure located at the comer of Marsh and Santa Rosa Streets.
i
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
— FINAL REPORT
Page 6-4
1
J
I
z
r
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS
SITE CONCEPT H MARSH-HIGUERA 3 AISLE TRANSIT CENTER
Concept H is similar to Concept G, except it adds a third bus bay in order to provide the desired
rune bus loading bays. Six bays would be provided in the northbound direction and three bays
would be provided in the southbound direction. A 250 space parking structure could be
developed on the site south of the Bank of America Building. Another 80 parking spaces could
be provided by extending the two upper decks of the parking structure over the southern half of
the bus loading aisles.
350760 WILBUR SMfTH ASSO
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY
FINAL REPORT
Page 6-5
i
� N
Q =n
_ �R
Q y T,r � F _ __,�.�rr� � �� {)r - t.,is .il� +�/s '7�+•` {�,�d�`t rt
I .e
. f w
vlj
ul
Ai
-177
p1 n
' h ► zt�"
FF '•;- -?�;;.�. - '1�^ - 'fig .z _ .�" Y �-
'.tL h/G _r .�-"Y'S._•...�'•_ t Y. ;_ t .J Ir J 1.: \ .
tsS -
SS
T
i tt
tS
r C !t
F'1O'''�`* 49!TEE. +_ �.,' - X^xxc;2..,.»."•r:+nM. �} ,�
XOSA
4 ` 1
Air
ANN
I _ « c ._ .. _ _....__ •-
,t
u
Chapter 7
SUMMARY EVALUATION I
Each of the eight site development concepts were evaluated with respect to a series of criteria,
which are designed to describe passenger objectives, transit service provider objectives, and ease I
of implementation objectives. Table 3 describes the summary evaluation.
NUMBER AND TYPE OF BUS BAYS I
Seven of the eight site developmentalternatives meet or exceed the desired nine bay bus loading I
positions and two exceed the desired eleven bay positions. Only Concept G failed, falling one
short at eight bays. Concepts A, B and C provide for sawtooth bay designs, which allow full
independent access and egress to each loading bay. All the others provide tandem parallel curb I
loading positions, which involve somewhat dependent bus operations. Concept H however
provides sufficient space between its parallel bus loading positions to allow full independent
access and egress. I
CIRCULATION SAFETY
Concepts A, B, C, and D with north-south oriented bus aisles located between Monterey and
Higuera Streets were judged to provide the best bus access and egress to the site from public
streets. Concepts A, B and D however would require the installation of a bus-actuated traffic '
signal on Monterey Street in order to operate efficiently. Concepts E and F would benefit from a
new signal being installed at the Toro and Monterey intersection. Concepts A, B, C and D were
judged to provide good access based on the site circulation pattern relative to the one-way street '
system. Concept H and particularly Concept G relate less efficiently to the one way street
system. Concept E would require closure of Higuera Street to general traffic and would
complicate the Santa Rosa Street intersection operation. Concept,F would complicate both the I
Toro and Santa Rosa Street intersections. Thus Concepts E, F, G and H were judged to provide
only fair circulation for buses.
DEVELOPMENT COSTS '
As shown in Table 3, all eight concepts are estimated to cost between $1.0 and $1.9 million to
construct Concept A is estimated to cost more because it is a larger facility providing more bus
bays. Eliminating Concept A from the comparison, the cost range narrows to $1.0 to $1.5
million. These cost estimates all exclude the cost of land acquisition and implications on
sales/property tax losses. These land and tax cost differences probably would offset or
minimize differences in estimated development costs shown in Table 3.
35076 I
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 7- 1
I
N
• C OsM p� C
N
C+ v O e+f �^ e0 ee O
cc 0
LL _ N N w v tn y G
69
I h
O
(7 O00 w h � I c CONa'
0 N N V O p
4H N 0 I x
0 Y W
00 u
O W _
Es •+ N r�i e�f ►�i
O O G O W
G w oaw � No � a v,
I � � xCR •� mix
a c Y
O � Y
' (gyp oo� � 00O � cOO d ai
C4 Z
Aw
F pcc6. 14
I w �
V p
Z W
N 'C 4r O
F CG a� o p n 1 o d 000 1 V E0 G
Vq `c° oC7 ox
W in
m 'E
it
ovOi � `+' � 0 r
Q O O � N � 0aheOn =
r N E PI E JD .0 a O
O % t7
a w uo!
w v
cc
wUA m CL. ° 0 � o O
I E m a - y
oEoEy
6 02
d
u CL
`. .�
SUMMARY EVALUATION
MAXIMUM TRANSFER DISTANCE
The distance required to walk between transfer buses is important for two reasons. First and
most obvious, people do not like to walk farther than necessary. Second and less obvious, the
walk distance can make the difference between catching your transfer bus and missing it. The
distances shown in Table 3 indicate the maximum distance between the nine desired bus bays in
each concept. At an average walking speed of three feet per second, walking times would range I
from a low of 80 seconds for Concept G to a high of 130 seconds for Concept A. Most of the
concepts provide maximum walking times of 110 to 130 seconds. In general, the larger the
facility the longer the maximum transfer walking distance. I
PROXIMITY TO SANTA ROSA STREET
Most passenger destinations downtown are located west of Santa Rosa Street. Santa Rosa Street
also fimctions as a major bus thoroughfare. The closer the transit centers are to Santa Rosa
Street, the more convenient they are for customers and the less out of direction travel required
for buses to circulate to/from the site. Distance ranges shown in Table 3 describe the closest and
farthest bus bay. Aside from Concepts A and F all concepts provide their bays within 300 feet of
Santa Rosa Street. Concepts C, E, and F have some bus bays located at or along Santa Rosa
Street. Concepts G and H located between Higuera and Marsh Streets have their nearest bus bay
about 220 feet from Santa Rosa Street and therefore are the most remote facility concepts. I
VISIBILITY I
Visibility is important for security as well as marketing reasons. Passengers are attracted to a
transit center when they can see it from their destination(west of Santa Rosa Street). A compact
location along a well-lighted major traffic thoroughfare tends to experience the highest security I
for waiting passengers. The most compact and visible location is the Shell Station site
(Concept Q. The two concepts located behind the Bank of America Building would be the least
visible of the eight site concepts. i
POTENTIAL FOR PARKING
The amount of surface and structured parking which could be provided in conjunction with each
of the eight site development concepts is shown in Table 3. Estimates will vary depending on a
wide range of factors including number of floors, setbacks and retail use trade-off. Estimates for
structured garages assume four floors of parking with no ground floor retail. Increase gain
related to mechanized parking is not reflected in these estimates. Two figures are shown for I
concepts A, B and H with the higher number assuming third and fourth floor extension of
parking decks over the transit centers. The six concepts located along Higuera Street and
between Higuera and Monterey Streets appear to offer the greatest potential for increasing
parking supplies. Concept D was designed to avoid the need to use the Dean Whitter Building
parcel and therefore no parking increase would be provided with this concept.
350760 _
SAN LUIS 0111SPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACUM STUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 7-2
SUMMARY EVALUATION
MINIMUM PROPERTY NEEDS
The difficulty of implementation tends to increase with the number of property owners involved,
the site size/location/active use and probably complete acquisition versus partial acquisition.
Table 3 describes the parcels that would need to be acquired for each of the eight concepts.
Hazmat problems are known to exist on the 1166 Higuera Street property and reportedly have
been remediated on the 1144 Higuera Street property. No information is available on the other
parcels.
SUMMARY
Concept A appears to provide more capacity than minimally needed but meets "desired" levels
and to limit opportunities to add to parking supplies. Concept B appears to be a very functional
alternative avoiding the contaminated 1166 Higuem Street parcel. Concept C also appears to be
very functional, but would involve acquisition of the Shell Station parcel (probably expensive).
Concept.D is judged to be a poor compromise. Concept E and F along Higuera Street would not
be as visible as other alternatives and would impact Higuera Street access to several parcels as
' well as complicating operations of several intersections. Concept G fails to provide the desired
nine bays and has less than desired circulation features. Concept H is more efficient than
Concept G,but is also not as visible as the Monterey/Higuera.Street block site concepts.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The relatively low current passenger transfer rates which are described in Chapter 2 and the
structure of City and County bus routes suggest that nine bus bays could amply accommodate
current and future transit needs, although the 13 bus bays suggested by the 1993 MMC Report
would be ideal. The two-block area bounded by Monterey Street,Toro Street,Marsh Street and
Santa Rosa Street(minus the Bank of America and hospital parcels), afford a number of options
Ifor the development of a regional transit facility providing the desired nine bus bays.
Many factors influence the selection of the best site location and site design for transit passenger
' facilities. These include: responsiveness to passenger needs; responsiveness to transit operator
needs; "good neighbor" fit with surrounding land uses, activity patterns and traffic circulation;
and also implementation ease and cost. Viewed only from the perspective of transit
I passengers and transit operations, the best site concept for the North Area Regional
Facility on the two-block study area would be Concept C (Shell Station). This concept is
located closest to Downtown, is very visible and works well with the circulation system (some
' buses would not even need to leave the street).
Development of Concept C would appear to be compatible with adjacent land uses and with the
' Downtown Plan thereby being a "Good Neighbor." It would provide the greatest flexibility to
redevelop the remaining portions of the block for parking or other desired uses. Another
advantage is that property acquisition only involves one property owner if a transit center only
' option is pursued.
350760 V✓ILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY STUDY
FINAL REPORT
' Page 7-3
SUMMARY EVALUATION
The present use of the site appears to be a strong business generating much needed tax revenues I
for the City. These tax revenues would be lost with Concept C unless the service station was
relocated. property acquisition would involve negotiations with only one owner, but the
property could be expensive based upon current use. The presence of contaminated soils on the
property and related remediation costs could also be implementation issues that need further
investigation. A detailed hazmat investigation should be initiated and its results know before I
concluding any purchase and sale agreement for this Shell Station site.
Should cost or other factors complicate pursuit of Concept C, Concept B (the Compressed I
Site) also works well from the perspective of transit riders and transit operations. Its
development would avoid possible problems related to soil remediation of the 1166 Higuera
Street parcel and would provide an efficient footprint for development of a parking garage by the
City at the Toro Street end of the block. A bus only traffic signal would be needed on Monterey
Street to safely exit buses from the site. While similar to Concept A proposed in 1993,
Concept B appears to provide more bus bay capacity than is required and limits opportunities for '
development of a parking garage on the remaining portion of the block.
As noted in Chapter 3, reservations exist concerning the construction of a parking deck over the I
transit center. These reservations relate to negative impacts on the passenger waiting area
environment as well as the cost effectiveness of this strategy. However, partial coverage of the
passenger waiting area with a parking deck providing natural ventilation, noise dissipation and
avoiding blockage of security lines of sight however might be successfully accomplished.
I
I
I
I
350760
SAN LUIS OBISPO NORTH AREA REGIONAL FACILITY sTUDY WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
FINAL REPORT
Page 7-4
i
i
APPENDIX A
ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSACTION SCREEN
I
I
I
I PREPARED BY
SECOR INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
SECOR .. __
Itttc'rurtli<,ItnJ/ncrurrrlratccJ -.5 I
2 SII Project No.: 010.05604
May 8, 2000 LS U f I
Mr. Tim Bochum MAY - 9 �M `
City of San Luis Obispo
Public Works Department
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
955 Morro Street
PUBLIC 1NORKS QEFdF'�;iF.":TI
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Dear Mr. Bochum:
>4
Subject: Results of Environmental Property Transaction Screen, Commercial Property
Located North of Santa Rosa Street Between Marsh and Monterey Streets I
San Luis Obispo, California
r'�~
Introducti
SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR)has completed an environmental transaction screen for
the above referenced property in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) E-1528 Standard. The scope of work for this project has included a site reconnaissance,
regulatory agency database search, review of historical fire insurance maps, review of SECOR project Jh�
files,and completion of the ASTM Transaction Questionnaire. In the attached questionnaire,responses
under the Site Observations category were provided by SECOR. The findings of the transaction screen ,= .
`} Y�are presented in the following sections. Copies of site maps. the Transaction Questionnaire and _
regulatory database search report(Vista report) are attached.
Site Reconnaissance e Finding t I
6
The subject property encompasses two city blocks in downtown San Luis Obispo which are bounded
f
by Toro Street to the north, Santa Rosa Street to the south, Marsh Street to the east and Monterey E
Street to the west. Higuera Street transects the subject property from north to south. The subject t
properties are developed primarily with commercial buildings and offices. The eastern block is I'
primarily occupied by office buildings including converted residences along Toro Street, the old French '
Hospital building on Marsh Street, law offices, and the Bank of America branch office located at the
corner of Santa Rosa and Higuera Streets. The central portion of the eastern block is occupied by a
parking lot. None of the current businesses on the tem block would be expected to store or utilize
eas
bulk chemicals or generate hazardous waste.
Several businesses occupying the western block likely generate small quantities of hazardous waste. r
These sites include the Shell service station at the corner of Santa Rosa and Monterey Streets, the SM
Tire shop at the comer of Toro and Monterey Streets, and the Tire Pros shop at 1144 Higuera Street. -'
1(1llt':1, Sc ii, 1111• (1171?Jlu. It i 11"- .iii IS(I'i, 1lrr-/1.111 IS,ll, )fh-//iSFAN 7!'11'71 ?C(I,Pin n ' '
IMr.Tim Bochum
City of San Luis Obispo
May 8.2000
I Page 2
I Active underground storage tanks (USTs) are located at the Shell Station and USTs were formerly
located at the Tire Pros site and at the auto detailing shop located at 1166 Higuera Street. The Tire
Pros site(1144 Higuera) and at the auto detailing shop (1166 Higuera Street) formerly comprised the
Spring Toyota dealership. The subject property is surrounded by commercial properties on all four
sides,however, no active gas stations, dry cleaners or other sites of potential environmental concern
are located adjacent to the subject property.
ISite History F9ndiw
Historical Sanborn Maps prepared in.180, 1903, 1926, and 1944 were reviewed to evaluate historical
land use at the subject property. Copies of the historical maps are attached.
in 1888, the subject property consisted of one contiguous block occupied primarily by vacant parcels
and residences. A livery stable and feed shop with outdoor open stalls was located at the corner of
Monterey and Toro Streets. A small creek or drainage channel passed through the western portion of
the subject property in 1888, trending parallel to Monterey Street.
I By 1903, Higaera Street had been extended northward through the subject property, creating the
current property configuration. A narrow alley passed through the eastern block, trending north to
south. Properties located on the west side of the alley, fronting along Higuera Street, are shown as
' undeveloped. Residences are located on the eastern side of the alley, along Match Street. A small
hospital, not much larger than the adjacent residences, is shown near the corner of Marsh and Toro
Streets on the subject property. The western block is developed with several residences and the livery
stable at the corner of Monterey and Toro Streets, which now includes a buggy shop. The small creek
or drainage channel crossing the western block is no longer shown in 1903 and may have been filled
in or diverted through a buried drain.
' The 1926 map indicates that commercial development of the subject property had commenced. The
eastern block remained primarily residential in 1926, with the exception of an auto sales and service
' facility and adjacent contractor's woodworking shop in the location of the current Bank of America
branch office. The small hospital building near the corner of Marsh and Toro Streets has been
I enlarged and is identified as the San Luis Sanitarium. On the western block, the property currently
occupied by the Shell station is developed as an auto and tractor sales and service facility capable of
storing 70 cars. The area to the north of this facility (currently Tire Pros) is denoted on the map as
' "low ground". Along Monterey Street, a Chinese laundry is located at 1149 Monterey and an auto
repair shop is located at 1175 Monterey Street. A gas station is located at the corner of Monterey and
Toro Streets (currently SM Tire) with an adjacent repair shop and auto storage building.
IBy 1944, gas stations are located on three corners of the subject property and several auto repair,
storage, and painting shops are present. Gas stations are located at the corners of Marsh and Santa
IRosa, Monterey and Santa Rosa, and at Monterey and Toro Streets. Auto repair facilities are located
Mr.Tim Bochmn I
City of San Luis Obispo
May 8.2000
Page 3 I
adjacent to the gas stations. Auto painting shops are present at the corner of Santa Rosa and Higuera
Streets (current Shell station) and at 1121 Higuera Street.
Reg latory Database Smirch Findings I
The regulatory database search report prepared by Vista Information Solutions, Inc. indicated the
presence of 9 leaking underground storage tank(LUST) sites within a one-quarter mile radius of the I
subject property. Two of these sites, the Shell station at 1101 Monterey and the 1144 Higuera site,
are located on the subject property. Both of these LUST sites have received regulatory closure.
Shallow groundwater occurs at depths of less than 20 feet below ground surface and flows in a
southerly direction beneath this portion of San Luis Obispo. Three of the remaining LUST sites are
located across Monterey Street, and hydrologically cross-gradient, from the subject property. The
remainder of the sites have either received regulatory closure, affected soil only, or are located down- I
gmdiem and would not be expected to pose an environmental threat to the subject property.
The database search report also identified several nearby facilities (primarily automotive) which I
generate small quantities of hazardous waste as part of normal business operations. These sites, with
the possible exception of the active Shell station, are not considered an environmental threat to the
subject property. i
t 1144 Hi '
A gasoline UST and a waste oil UST located a Higuera Street and a waste oil UST at 1166
Higuera Street (together, the former Spring Toyota dealership) were removed in 1994 and soil '
contamination was discovered beneath each of the USTs. SECOR conducted site investigation and
cleanup activities at these locations, commencing in 1995. The locations of the former USTs are
shown on the attached Figure 2. '
At the 1144 Higuera site, contaminated soil was excavated from the locations of the former gasoline
and waste oil USTs. A concrete box culvert passes beneath the former waste oil UST location and a
small quantity of contaminated soil could not be excavated behind the box culvert, due to access
limitations. Approval to leave this soil in place was granted by the City of San Luis Obispo Fire
Department(SLOFD). Following removal and offsite disposal of impacted soil, three groundwater I
monitoring wells were installed. The wells were monitored on a quarterly basis until contaminant
levels in groundwater were at or near drinking water standards. Regulatory closure of the site was
granted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in December 1999. A copy of the closure letter '
is attached.
At the 1166 Higuem site, site assessment activities originally directed at the former UST location '
documented the widespread existenoe of contaminated soil, extending northward towards Toro Street.
The soil, impacted with heavy hydrocarbons and lead, appeared to be the result of contaminated fill
i
fMr.Tim Bochum
City of San Lois Obispo
I May g,2000
Page 4
placed on the property, rather than the small former waste oil UST. Within the contaminated fill, auto
parts including used oil filters were encountered. The full extent of the impacted soil was never
determined. Two groundwater monitoring wells were installed on the property and monitored on a
I semi-anmual basis. Groundwater samples collected from the wells indicated that shallow groundwater
W not been impacted by the contaminated soil. Based on the favorable groundwater data, the
property owner requested permission from the SLOFD to leave the impacted soil in place and repair
I the aspbalt parijang lot to create an impervious cap. Permission was granted by the SLOFD in Jammy
IW7,contingent upon ming a notification on.the property deed. Copies of the approval letter and
deed notification are attached.
Conclusions
f The subject site has a long history of automotive related businesses including service stations, repair
shops and painting shops. By 1944, service stations occupied three corners of the subject property.
' Underground storage tanks are ciirrently located at the Shell station, have been removed from 1144
and 1166 Higuera Street, and were presumably located at the corner of Monterey and Toro Stteetc.and
at the corner of Santa Rosa and Marsh Streets. Groundwater quality has been investigated beneath the
1144 and 1166 Higuera Street sites and is not currently impacted. It is not known whether
' groundwater has been sampled at the remaining former and current UST sites on the subject property.
I A small creek or drainage channel historically flowed across the western portion of the subject property
and appears to have been dimmelixod through a buried storm drain. During subsurface investigation
of 1144 and 1166 Higuera, abundant fill material containing various debris was encountered. At 1166
Higuera Street, a portion of the fill is known to be contaminated with.hydmcarbons and lead. The
western portion of the subject property appears to have been low lying and may have received fill from
undocumented sources. Based on the findings at 1166 Higuera Street, the potential exists for
tcontaminants to be present within the fill material.
A search of regulatory agency databases identified several leaking underground fuel tank sites within
the immediate vicinity of the subject property. However, based on the local groundwater flow
direction, current regulatory status and file information reviewed by SECOR, none of the listed sites
' are considered a significant environmental threat to the subject property.
Limitations
The results of this investigation represent a review of current conditions, based on available
information, as described above. SECOR has performed this Transaction Screen in conformance with
' the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1528-86. SECOR derived the data in this report
primarily from visual inspections, examination of records in the public domain, and interviews with
individuals having information about the site. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions,
' or occurrence of future events may require further study at the site, analysis of the data, and
Mr.Tim Bochum
City of San Luis Obispo
May 8,2000
Page 5 I
reevaluation of the findings, observations, and conclusions in this report. No warranty or guarantee,
whether express or implied, is made with respect to the data reported or findings, observations, and I
conclusions that are based solely upon site conditions in existence at the time of investigation.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions regarding the '
information presented herein, please do not hesitate to contact this office at your convenience.
Sincerely, I
SECOR International Incorporated I
,��RED GEpI
W.
Steve Little, R.G., H.G. r GAW * I
principal Hydrogeologist
OFu��,�'
attachments: Site Maps I
Transaction Screen Questionnaire
Historical Maps
Regulatory Agency Correspondence I
Vista Report
CAofFwe%work\downtown.up '
1
1
I
i
i
I
ffMMAM
f
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
2611
Street Map
A � .
. On.
EPA
Eli
Miles
. .
• -
- • • � 1 1 � a • • • I I 1
Liquors
Grove Motors
TORO STREET
Asphalt
Figure 3 for Detail
Retaining Was / \
/ Concrete \
I
Asphalt
I I
t 1
Former Waste \. /
Oil UST
(North Tank) Shop
Display
Ports
Solea Office
2 - Story Building
W LLI
LLJ Wooden fence __ W
X �� `` O
I j / Shops \\ Q
w I Officef oa= W
OI Concrete I =
I Former - I
W
al
UST \ / Block Wall
(West Tank) \ /
Y S /
0 Former
I \ n / 1.000 GAL
Gas UST
Shop � ��� (East Tank)
See Figure. 4 for Ihtoil
I Concrete
wash Rock
JfConcrete
(Scale in Feet)
Shell Station
0 40
SECOR International Incorporated
SITE MAP
I 1144/1166 HIGUERA STREET
SAN LUIS 0 ISPO. CALIFORNIA
3637 Empresa Drive. Snits A. Sen Leis Obispo. CA 93401
PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWING DATE: FIGURE:
I FILE NAME" JUNE 1995 2
46—A0130SM A0130-001-01
i
i
i
TRANSACTION SCREEN QUESTIONNAIRE
I
I
I
f E 1528
of such further inquiry whether to pry with a Phase I
I reasons for any such oondusion tal in accordance with
5.6.1 Upon obtaining an affirmative answerwer of Emvirommen
,an ans52 Site Assessment prepared
unknown or no response, the user should first refer to the Practice E 1527 or a lesser inquiry directed at specific issues
tray provide sufficient explanation to allow raised by the questionnaire.
guide The guide
a otter t Bond a that Provide
further inquiry is appropriate with 5.8 Further Inquiry Under Practice E 1527—Upon com-
I gtustion pleting the transaction screen questionnaire, if the user
respect to the partixaalar a particular question does not, in concludes that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is
5.62 If the guide particular
itW& permit a user to conclude that no further inquiry is nee" the user should proceewith such inquirywith the
I appropriate, ch
then the user should consider other information advice and guidanceshould environmentalea-inaccordancewith
obtained from the transaction screen Process further inquiry
27.
question. For example, while on the site performing a and Practice ure—The user and the preparer of the transact
visit.a person may find a storage tank on the property I questionnaire must complete and sign the ques-
therefore answer Question 10 of the transaction Screen tion screen quern
q�tiommaire in the affirmative. However, during or subso- tiounaire as provided at the end of the questionnaim.
quent to the owner/oa•itpant inquiry,the owner may produce
' evidence that substances now orhistorically contained in the 6. Transaction Screen Questionnaire
tank(for example,water)are not likely to cause contamma-
�� 6.1 Persons to Be Questioned-The following questions
5.6.3 If either the guide to the question or other informst should asked of(1of the property owner if the property doestion obtained during the transaction screen process does
not any IDal aau
permit a user to conclude no further inquiry is appropriate not have any major occupants,.at least 10 4b of the otxutpamts
with respccc to such question,then the riser must determine, of the property,and(3)in addition to the currentownerand
y to be
in the exercise of the user's reasonable
judgment, the occupants identified m (2), any occupant
I based upon the totality of unresolved afumative answers or using treating,8euetatirt&stoting,or disposing of hazardous
answers of unknown received during the transaction screen substances or petroleum products on or from the property.A
may be limited to those major ooc WM is any oca(pamt using at least 40% of the
process, whether further ofconmquirY with leasable area of the property or any anchor tenant when the
' specific issues identified as ofconcern or should proceed p1OPY is a shopping center. In a multifamilY property
a full Please I Environmental Site AsseuMML
5.7 Presranption--A presumption edsts that further in containing both residential eoa and commercial th uses, the
query it necessary if as affirmative answer is given to a prepa►er does not need to ask questions of the residential
I question or because the answer was unknown or no response occupants.The PrePar�r should ask each person to answer all
was given, in rebutting this presumption. the user should questions to the best of the respondent's actual browledge
evaluate dation obtained from each component of the and m good faith. When completing the site visit column,
mon acea process and consider, wbdba su&deryt the prWarer should be sure to observe the property and any
I information has baa obtained to conclude that no further buildings and other structures on the property. The guide
inquuy is necasm. The user must determine, in the provides further details on the appropriate use of this
=mix of the user's reasonable business judgment.the scope questionnaire.
Ipee zWM of Snc Addresc
' OMWT ompaaa(u apptieabW enured ootlea sea VW
I& Is the prapr*rr used Meir an indtmriak Yes No Unk. Yes No Unk Yes No
ase?
kb. 4 any m used for an Ya No Ude Ya No Unk Ya
indastmx met
?,• ped you absesve evidence m do you
Yes No Ude Yes No Unk Yes
' bave my prior knowledge that the property
has been Used for m mdmti9 urn in We
PUC
2b. Did you observe t�idenoe or do YOU
Ya No Unk Yes No Ude Ya
' have an7 R+m kvwtadge dw any ad%otntar
prpertybasbtra used for an industrial Ise fa
the paste
3a. h the property used as a coerfinez,�: Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Ya NO
' CMotor elan. m
Parrot .dry de= photo deed
yungmad or UnM oras a
�ueatmenx,storage,dWOUL Woarsaa&
or torydmg be ty CJ appticaw ideardy
*hum
T Unk-1mkPoW or-100 sespoas.' 34
C@ E 1528
Quesdall. Owmr' Owwwwts(if avoli agk)� Obwved During Site Visit
Ib. bray &#dn* property used as a Ya No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
gaoolioe Ratim motor repair 6ality. mm- I
maod Pdnft ficilisX dry clearers Dhow
dadopWg bboratap,junkyard or bndM
or m a waste acdmco% etmaps
peootssioa or wog 6aTay Cdappliable
Mor*wbidrn p NO
k x Did ym observe e„ideaor do you Ya No Unk Yes No Unk
bave eery prior knowledge tw she Pwerw
Isms bean sued as Is ygbLp T '
remv�.eomered printing Gerlay.
dry dam& pboto developing laboratory.
jnnlgwrd or hmm or as&;f=trutmal.
�diifposa!'taooesdui or recycling tr I
OT"Graapliclaw mall*whichn
AL Did you observe evdeua or do you yes No Usk Yes No Unk Ya No
ban any prior knowledge that any adjam*
jaWmy bas been used as Is psolioc Raven•
now apair how. commercial priming
6e'6gr,dry clans,000&KWPM lobo
satiny.jurkyatd or bum or as a waI
YWmmt. stave, disposal processing.or
s &wiry Cd' ih
wire
Ude Ya
Ser Amanf rbc or Yrs No Ude Yes No
ce ere ted,
dr-arded automotive or industrial batteries
paddder,paints.or other ehemia4 it iu&
vided aousainm of>s gd(19 U in volare
or so gd(1901)m the vSVegatr.Bored on
of cod at the property,or m the 6dTity)
S0. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Ude Yes No Ude Yes
bave any prior knowledge that there have I
been previously any damaged or cases"
ama®atim or industrial batteries or Pesti-
edea.parva,or rbc ehemiats in ind vidual
eomamea of>S gal(19 U in volumm:or 50
VI(190 y in the agprcote,stored an or used I
at the property or at the 6d7tyf
da.An there camady any iadunnal yes No Unk Yes No Usk Yes
I(Opiadly SS gal(IDs 1j)or aaeks of
themiob band on the property or at the I
6alstyt
b'b. Did you abserve evidence or do you yes No Ude Yes No Unk Yes
have ray prior knowledge the time have
been previously ray industrial drmu(syP- '
cony ss gat QOg I))or ssks of ehemics
tooted on the property or at the 6trlityt
7a. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Uok Yes No Unk No
have any prior knoalodge that fig dirt has '
been brought onto the property than ori®-
sand bum a mntamiaatod site?
7b. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Unk Yes No Unk No
have any prior ksowledgc slat fig dirt has
been brought onto the propcxtY that is of an '
wlmoarn origin?
AL Are there currently any pits,ponds.or Yes No Usk Yes No Unk Yes G
fogooas looted on the property in emmedion
with waste tratmmt or waste d sposan
B0. Did you observe evideece or do you yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
have any pnor knov4cdge that that have
been previously.any pits jrords.or k gOm
k=W an the property is moaadsnn with
waste treatment or waste dtsposar!
9a b there dmwdy any Rained soil on the Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
pgmfn
35 '
E 1528
i
I Question Owner' Occup"ekI applicable) Observed Daring Site YWt
' 9b. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
have any prior knoalcoge that there bas beta
previously.any stained mil an the pmpeW.
IQa. Are there currently any registered or Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Y® No
ammsbteod storage mks(above or under
pouod)bated an the property?
10b. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Unk Yes No Unk No
bare any prior knowledge that that have
been pVvkously. any gis- or
I ummmsc ed storage tans(above or under-
ground)located on the property?
I la Ave tbae currently any vent pipes,fill Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Y® No
pipes. or scats ways indicating a fiU pipe .
protruding ham[be ground an the property
or a4mccut to any sesame bated on the
AWWWO
Ilb. Did you observe evidence or do you Yes No Unk Yes No Unk ® No
have any prior knowledge than tbere have
been previously.any vent pipes,fill pipes.or
seers ways rod-um a fill pipe pattrding
fiom the gmtnd on the property or adjacent
to any structure located an the propwry!
12a. Are tide tamendy any Gaming drains, Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
or walk looted wdlun the firMy that we
mined by substances other than water or are
emitting foul cdore
I 12d Did you observe o vidaroe or b you Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
have any prior knowledge dmi there bave
been peeviomy any Goosing.chains ar walk
within the fitnTuy that sae mined by scab
I mncesotherthan water or were emittiog&W
Adow.
13L If the property is saved by a private Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
well or non-publ water s3 1, is there
evidence ordo you have prior knowledge that
' couominam have been identified in the van
or system that cwmd geriddim applicable m
the Nate Asim?
I3b. If the property is saved by a private Yes No Unk Yes No Unk Yes
' well or nayublie water synem, is mere
e+idmse orb you have prior knowledge man
the well has been designated as commansioanod
by by government envimnmenW/baltlr
' 14. noes the owner or oaoeropam of the prop. Yes No Unk Yes No Unk
dry have any knowledge of enriroaementnt
Barr at governmental notification relating to
Pan or rmnr m viohd m of envioamtaW
' laws Nim respect to the property of any
faality band an the pfoperry?
ISL Has the owner or oaarpaar of the prop Yes No Unk Yes No Unk
cry been hMmned of the past existence of
I harmdour aubtrmucer or parofeom pnxium
with respect to the property or any Wiliity
looted on the property!
15b. Has the owner or occerpma of the prop Yes No Unk Yes No Unk
' cry been informed of the current camenoe of
hazardous substanca or perroleam product;
with respect to the property or any facility
looted on the property?
15r– Has the owner or artup m of the prop Yes No Unk Yes No Unk
' my been informed of the pan existence of
monumental violations with respect to the
property of any facility located an the pap
cry?
I ISd. Has the owner or omrpaat of the prop Yet No Unk Yes No Unk
aq been informed of the runt existence of
environmental violations with vespers to the
property or any 6cility looted an the prop
eRl?
36
f E 1528
Q�
pwser7 Ueeatmms Or appllable)` observed Doing Site Ykh
16. Dm the owner or occAm o of the prop Yes No Unk Yes No Usk
pry have any koowkdp of any emviroo-
mead site ascammod of the p operrY or
fap'6{y tint mdiestad the 1rrlsesoe of kms-
ardotu trr pesrofema P�01't O°'
or mostamination a(the prAPOTY err te0Drs'
mended farther ancoment of the PnWtMl
17. Doer the owns or aCCIPSM of the prM6 Yes No Usk Yes No Unk
cry knew of any past,thtatena4 or Pending
bvrsuits or administrative poccedinp con-
earnings
ns-oasis`s release or threatened r I of my
kamrdao svbammm or petroleum pv&w
invdving the pgwW by any owner or om-
pant of the:propenyl
1SL Doer the y diadeaege waste Ya No Unk Ya No Unk Ya No '
wam an or sdla=t to the properly,other
than attam rater.into a harm water serer
tin=?
Igd Dan the prrwpe"Y 116+'ge vane Yes No Usk Ya No Usk Yes No
rater.on or sdpnmt to the propavy.ocher
dm storm rata. into a sanitary aetwrr
spmm7
19. Did ym observe e.rdesoe ordo you bm Yes No Ude Yes No Unk NC
any prior bmdedge that any hazmdero
A&gaama or pc m m products,t®dard
bed waste materials, time. automotive or
industrial batteries.Or anY other taste atalo-
riok have been damped above rade.buried
and/or burned to the ptpertyl
20. b thou a trandormeti opaatat or any Yes No Usk Yes No Ude Yes
hychmolicacruiPcOMfOr whidt these are any
eaoolda
godielting the proomm of PCW '
Government ReaadsAUMOrinl Seaaaes Inquiry
(See wide.Senior 10)
21. Do day of the Wowing Fader►6nvanmm tread Wm ns 6u the property err any pmputy within the eirarmfaena of the
area now hdoac Yes '
Nadegg Priorities lis[—rithin 1.0 mile(1A Bm)3 Yes
CERCLIS Lbs—within OS sole AS Roc)') Yes
RCPACDRRACIS Fao7dics-within 1.0 ole(1-6a
KMV l
WM mo COM %M TSO Fiolitia—wilhiu&5 mile Ou KMV
22. Do my of the Wowing ante:rmotd norms fist me plow"or any ptame with the dreamfaeoae of the am now
hdmar
List maintained by state mvirmmmnt agency of haardms nom t8tes identified 0>r)nvatigatios or rersediatim that is the Yes
atm aCM teluivakat to NM—whim spprwmontdy lb mile(IA Roc))
List maimaimd by scam environmental a8 ofaims idntified for invmigmim Or emed'istion that is the dam tgtavaknt Yes ® '
to CFRQIL-within 0.5 ole(0F KAI)? No
(alnsg Underground Storage Tank(f.=Litt—+within OS mile(0.6 Rm)7 ® .
Sam Waste/iandfr0 FaeiGtiea-d within U voile%8 Ron
23. Based upon a review orfw ianamror numa or common.with the local fire department serving the proprrly.e.0 as '
specified in the guide.are any building;or Other imtaorements em the properly or m an afijofahm property identified as having
been orad for an industrial use or ones QdY to lead m wnramination of the property' ® No N/A
The repoof be pansaGism seen gear Msum must Complete dad sirs the folbwing patemeot (For definition of
rt
•loeoateP'and'tint:m 5.3 or 3325.) '
ltus questionnaire was completed by:
Name
Title
Fig
Address
Phone sumbrr
Dam '
If the prepuce is different than the user,e000m the following
Name of user
Usds address
Usees phone number
pm arces rdatiouship to WO oonsulust) .
Preparers rdadawMP to user(for atampie.prmoPa4 CmPloyee.+gent
37
I
I
I
EaMRICALMAPS
1
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
Fin .;1688
136 y
N`.W16081
CAG-,.
! it �I i ',� ;'I l •�•: I!
Af
hJq
I I '
! 4'
trfrR-
Ar
I r O I
t
10
jor
I '
41
TA ROSH
w
2 YI
60
49
p a s s 9oe 13 Al Ir 91 17
' HOM FEED STABLE i'• 'SO'
• ! II
Ar
r t71 i i t
sag I
1 !
!
30 � - R.R � I I f
I I I
Ii
:I
op
27
L7i
JF
9 � aw 07 '
60
jai.
I ,r -- k
( Yi'P� � � � I ww w�'�•�� � �Iw�' •�
11AFFII`I� fly!
� � � � 1 i I Imo. .• . i• � ,.
.d _ d � �• D � ilil 1 1 . i-
Ia J
�• - � dam'1 ' ! ' � �; I�'' � : I
lam
Ir
IA
Er
d• •'` ., i ' ; � ! I �•. MOOd I. YAAo I• . ++ II�,, ` �'� • ! !; ,I. I
I 1165 ' I. � . I•'.� ' (.'i ;�;
w�•w�S r1 I � , ' � I i � I•V • �;I
1 I I ��• I � I ` � I� II
Iii •I�:
3W
r
�ti � '� j ! t�'�I•!, ark+ !'I � '
I � � l.fr,l,M'�a(i it •.•
1 ! ,�,�
I l I.
I
1 I x
I ! Scale of Feet. 'I _ �►L _ — = — — ����r
_ i yo .� ,loo • iso' � � ' ! I ' i , '1
tl lowwnw � i 1� I I'
�• yriwir.xn[. ' '� 19 I 1 I 1 ��.1' I , '' 'r•�
t�yy •I �.
Le
116
1 I •` I ' )111 t I•{. I I I I
Ifs .. IIS, '' a..l• f.'1� �:
I;, —I .=a= 1 ��� '� '� � N � � �r �: � � �i r. i ii I:II 1III- I,i {, •� I ,II��I
' I r1'.--i'1••�, ., 'i.' '�' :, � �� I' ( II- .I•., 1 rl 'F,I ;�-�1'
II .�' � c��-�•i i.:��rr�! L'A�. i ��: 1,71 ,
.I i I• •I r �Lt-C� •r
}�LY;� �. I 1t •r. ;�• u
Y Vis✓ .O� ��. �� I I ; 4 � ;�Ij I• it I ',.11'II
' de Ix
mow
1
S ele o� Feet.
�.]O • 'y.r w C r •I � '�11
f �,Myrrr.rrl 19 I I •1'
�1� 6 I ; I •
I I I i ' III ',; � •�^
C41-
I
I
REGULATORY AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
California Regi al Water Quality Co' `rol Board -
1 Coast Region
ion g
pete wiison
Intenet Address: hW jtwwwswrebA=9ov Goum+W
K Rooney 81 Niguas Sueet,Suite 200.Sen Luis Obispo,C9111bMi8 93401-5427
cmewlyJor phone(805)549-3147•FAX(905)543-0397
December 21, 1998 2 s t
IMr.Stanford Clinton,Jr.
213 Albert Avenue
ISan Luis Obispo,CA 93405
Dear Mr.Clinton
UGT: 1144 HIGUERA STREET+ SAN LUIS OBISPO; FORMER SPRING TOYOTA; CASE
CLOSURE
I ember 22, 1998 Request for Site Closrae
We have reviewed Sever International Incorporated's � monitoring 22, events were conducted in the
Determination for the subject site. A total of four quarterly g and water samples
monitoring wells at the site between August 1996 and July 1997,and confirmatory 8�
were taken from the monitor wells on September 28, 1998,Those confirmatory samples indicated total
petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg) at 130 µg/L(micrograms per liter,aPPmximatelY Parts Per
billion— ppb) and 54 ttg/L in MWl and MW29 respectively. Concentrations of methyl-tertiary-butyl-
f were 15 pg/L , 0.7 pg/L and 14 pg/L in MWI, MW2 and MW3, respectively. Benzene,
ether(MtBE) were not detected during the September 1998 sampling event.
toluene,ethylbenzene and xylenes(BTEJQ
IBased on the above facts, tis hsite is ready for closure of regulatory oversight by this agency, and we
have no further.require'ements for soil or ground water investigatiion.or cleanup. Please submit the
information requested in parts H,III,t IV,V,and$of the enclosed Case Closure Summary.We will issue a final closure letter when we receive the complded Case Closure Summary and upon receipt of proof
the monitoring wells have been properly abandoned by a C-57 licensed well driller. The well
abandonment must carried out in accordance with California Department of Water Resources Bulletins
No. 74-81 and No. 74-90, Sections 13710 through 13755 of the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control
Act, and any local requirements. The monitoring well abandonment needs to be supervised by a
California Registered Geologist or a California Registered Civil Engineer.
If you have any questions,please contact Ken Katen at(8051549.-4695.
ISincerely,
IFor.Roger W.Briggs
Executive officer
' enclosure
cc: /Mr.Steve Little,R.G.,H.G.
I Mr.Spencer Meyer
City of San Luis Obispo,Fire Department Scoot International Incorporated
2160 Santa Barbara Street 3437 Empresa Drive,Suite A
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-7355
California Environmental Notedion Agenry
California Regional Water Quality Cohtrol Board
Central Coast Region Gray Davit I
coo ILHiclroa - Go ernor
ercaay for haemet Address httpJ/wwwswreb.cLgov/--rwgcb3
drone wud 81 Higucta Street.Suite 200,San Luis Obispo-California 93401-5427
Phone(805)549=3147•FAX(805)543-0397 I
December 6, 1999
Mr.Stanford Clinton,Jr.
213 Albert Avenue I
San Luis Obispo,CA 93405
Dear Mr.Clinton:
UGT: SITE CLOSURE; 1144 HIGUERA STREET, SAN LUIS OBISPO; FORMER SPRING
TOYOTA(CURRENTLY TIRE PROS) I
This letter confirms the completion of site investigation and remedial action for the underground storage
tanks formerly located at the above-described location. Thank you for your cooperation throughout this '
investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former
underground storage tanks are greatly appreciated.
Based on the available information in the above-referenced file,and with the provision that the information
provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions,no further action related to the
underground tank release is required.
This notice is issued pw umrt to a regular<ion contained in Section 2721(e)of True 23 of the California Code I
ofReguladons.
If you have questions regarding this matter,please call Sheila Soderbem at(805)549-3592 or Jay Cano
at(805).549-3699.
Sincerely, I
bC.gerBriggs
Officer I
S.\USA\Sheila\San Luis Obispo\1144 i iguera\closure 1wer.doc
cc:
Mr. Spencer Meyer
City of San Luis Obispo
City Fire Department
2160 Santa Barbara Street
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
California Environmental Protection Agency I
&o vkdPgw
December 17, 1996 rar vdm
9rtml Coast Mr.Stanford Clinton,Jr. Spencer Meyer
eel Water P.O.Box 12060 City of San Luis Obispo,Fire Dept
u7'Contra, San Luis Obispo,CA 93406 2160 Santa Barbara Ave.
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
Lswd
Dear Mr.Clinton and Mr.Meyer
#2M
D � V
limb MOO CA
SLIC-1166 HIGUERA ST,SAN LUIS OBISPO
s4v.3147
X(M)5434M Based on SECOrs September 24, 1996 and December f 2, 1996 groundwater sampling results, it appears groundwater has not been significantly (n% detected at I mgti) affected by releases
from waste oil tanks located at 1166 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo. Given the petroleum
hydrocarbon and lead soil contamination at this site,we are referring this case back to the City of
San Luis Obispo F'ce Department Please no,-,we will retain 4�4-e 1144 Higaem Street,San Luis
Obispo site.
' San Lan Obispo County, Division of Environmental Health has expressed an interest in the
elevated lead concentrations in soil at the 1166 Higuera Street site and has been involved in
some of the decisions regarding assessment and remediation. Therefore, please contact the
I County of San Luis Obispo at the address listed below to determine if the County is still
interested in providing oversight
' If you have any questions,please can Frank J DeMarco at 542.4638.
Sincerely,
t„ Roger W.Briggs
Executive Officer
' FJIYYA&aaN1166re£doe
Task:302-51
rNuic SGT/114.-1166 Eiiraem St.Sao Lass Gbispu
cs: John Scholtes
San Luis Obispo County
Division of Environmental Health
2156 Sierra Way
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401
Steve Little
SECOR
I 3437 Empresa Dr.,Suite A
San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-7355
40 Rec3nkdP4W Our fidxd R it topees"mid enhaw dw qua*VfWLAOrnla'5 W80 nnromoex and
Cs eampe da*unwer al/oeanon and eRNrnf w fi dr I—P if.d.-....d. d IG.w...""
in-07-97 09:57
Sao SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
4 0 2156 Siena Way • P.O. Boa 148.9 • San Luis Obispo, California 93406 I
MMM (805 7815544 • FAX (805) 781.4211
December 311 1996
Mr. Stanford Clinton, Jr.
P.O. Box 12060 I
San Luis Obispo, California 93406
Subject: Request for Closure of Property located at 1166 Higuera '
Street, San Luis Obispo, California
Pursuant to our discussion, no further action .is required. by. this '
office regarding the above-mentioned property. This approval for
closure is continent upon capping the areas which contain elevated
levels of soluble lead with an asphalt paving, thereby preventing I
further migration of the soluble lead, if any, into the subsurface.
In addition, this approval is contingent upon disclosing the
presence of soluble lead in your deed notification. '
Please be advised that this letter does not relieve you of any
responsibilities mandated by the California Health & Safety Code if
additional or previously unidentified contamination is discovered
at the subject site.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
the Hazardous Materials Division,at (805) 781-5555.
I
CHARLES K. TENBORG H.S., R .H.S, R.E.A.
Senior Environmental He th Specialist
cc: Spencer Meyer, SLO City FD
- � JAN 10 1997
�18�� S�1'1WIS oBlc� o �
I
I FIRE DEPARTMENT
2160 Santa Barbara Street• San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5240 • 8OSM-7380
••Courtesy B'Service"
January 7, 1997
I
Steve little, R.G., C. HG:
ISECOR International, Inc.
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: 1166 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
Proposed Site Disposition
IDear Mr. little:
The Fire Department has reviewed your Proposed Site Disposition regarding the above-referenced
address. Along with Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Environmental Health
Department, we take no exception to your basic proposal, which includes c4.Tm /conw meat of
affected soils, a groundwater monitoring regiment and deed notification.
Once the basic site prmequisites have been addressed to the satisfaction of this department,we will issue
a conditional "No Further Action" pursuant to your request. Should you-or the Clintons have any
questions pertaining to this project, please do not hesitate to call meat 781-7393.
Sincerely,
Ieye
' us Materials Coordinator
c: Stanford Clinton Jr., Property Owner
Frank DeMarco, RWQCB
John Scholtes, County EH
The city of San Luis OWWO is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities•
Teiewmmunications Device for the Deaf(905)781-7410.
IN 1111111114 11 city of san luis OBISPO
•
FIRE DEPARTMENT
2160 Santa Barbara Avenue•San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-5240.805!781-7380
"Courtesy B Service"
October 13, 1998
Steve Little, R.G., C. HG.
SECOR International, Inc.
3437 Empresa Drive, Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: 1166 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA
Dear Mr. Little:
We have reviewed your request to have the Fire Department issue a conditional "No Further Action"
letter regarding this site. Assuming that the documentation and information provided by SECOR was
accurate and representative of existing site conditions, your request has been granted.
Please mote that the proposed.groundwater monitoring regiment through October of 1999 must be I
strictly adhered too and, that if the building and/or property is modified, expanded, or
redeveloped, the contaminated sons will have to be remediated. It should be noted that this letter
does not relieve the property owner of any responsibilities mandated under the Califorma.Health& I
Safety Code if existing, additional, or previously-unidentified contamination is discovered.
Should you or the Clintons have any questions pertaining to this project, please do not hesitate to call me
at 781-7383.
Sincerely,
S e
H ous Coordinator
C: Stanford Clinton Jr., Property Owner
Ken Katen, RWQCB
Hal Halnnula, SLO Building Dept.
Il�l The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities.
Telecommunications Device for the Deal(8051781-7410
IRECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED !TAIL THIS DEED AND,
MMESS OTHMUSE SHOWN BEIAW, BAIL TAS
STATEMENT TO Doc No: 1991-009495 Rec NO: 0001243
Naas Stanford Clinton, Jr. Official Records ;RF 13.00
I San Luis Obispo Co. ;
Address Three Bar Ranch Julie L. Rodewald ;
Recorder ;
City Q Recluse Feb 269 1997 ;
' state WyomingTime: 16:34
sip 82725 [ 31 ;
,TOTAL 13.00
GRANT DEED
PLL6D IPMAWlawt
tThe undersigned Grantor declares
D000103liTARY TRANSFER TAZ Is $ -0-
City of Baa Luis Obispo
Parcel No. 002-436-COS
Parcel Ho. 002-436-008
IFOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged,
STANFORD CLINTON, Jae
hereby GRAIi'1'B to
BTAWORD CLINTON, JR.
the tolloxinI described real property in the City of Ban Luis
Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, state of Californias
TSE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 18 ATTACHED HERETO AS EBHIBIT A.
This deed is being recorded to add the following recital to the
legal description:
The northern portion of this property hassoil
containing lead and hydrocarbons.
I
I
I
gated
BTATS OP CAL romlI .
COU11TY OF _QM l (e,
on a_ _ q y before me.
a Rotary public in and for said
County and state, personally 1
appeared S�/Im�nrr CIr►�fat� Jf
personally known to me (or proved
to as on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person whose
aamG is subscribed to the within
instruseat and aelcnowladgad to me
that he ereauted the same is his
authorised capacity, and that by MAKIFISHER �
his .siyaatnre oa the instsomeat the MMLC CA 0
person, or the entity upon behalf �, - '
of which the person-acted, szecnted
the instrument.
=%=as my hand and official Beal
Bigaatnre, Ua
_, '
%Wood is humin is described as N,- is- n
JARCEL 1 :
E.0
T PORTION OF BLOCK 30 OF THE CITY Of SAN LUIS OBISPO AND OF
CK 30 OF THE BUCKLEY TRACT, IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO..
NTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO* STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE
MAPS OF. SAID CITY AND SAID TRACT, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
CORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED. AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
F
TORO STREET WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE Of HIGUERA STREET AS
IO STREET LINES EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 16, 1946;
ENCE SOUTH 530 40' WEST ALONG SAID LINE OF HtGUERA STREET,
97.85 FEET;
irwCf NORTH 360 19• WEST, 90 FEET;
HENCE NORTH 530 40' EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
MIGUERA STREET, 189 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
IF TORO STREET;
FIENCE SOUTH 420 58' EAST ALONG SAID STREET LINE 90 FEET, MORE
DR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CEL 2:
MAT PORTION OF BLOCK. 30 OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AND Of
OCK 30 OF THE BUCKLEY TRACT, IN THE CITY Of SAN. LUIS OSISPO,
RXINTY OF SAN. LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE
YAPS OF SAID.-CITY AND SAID TRACT, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
EUtmtwo
NTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
AT A POINT :ON THE WESTERLY LINE• • OF TORO. STREET, WHICH
S SOUTHA60 43 EAST, 137. FEET, MOREOR. LESS,FROM THE
RLY CORNER OF MONTEREY AND TORO - ifift —p SA
TS' ALSO BEING
NORTM :CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHARLES J. RUSSELL,
3Y pEED' DATED APRIL 27, 1889 AND RECORDED MAY 6, 1889 ' 1N BOOK 4,
romPeltiry
389 OF OEEOS;CE SOUTH Som 06, WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE
so, CONVEYEo, _ 155,99 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST
ER OF.. THE PROPERTY CONVEYED To H. 8. 'DOUGLAS ET UX., er DEED
TED MARCH: 4, 1946 AND RECORDED MARCH J, 1946 HN BOOK 403, PAGE
1 'OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;
"ENCONVEYEbH TO TME350 l - WEST*SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE PROPERTY
DEED DATED JANUARY 26, 1955/WDFR�RDEDPJANUAERTY RYN3p,�E19S0 N 80O NN,
0, PAGE 135 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS;
NEC N NOREYETfr 140 06• EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF THE PROPERTY
CONVEYED, I3YIN FEET TO THE EAST CORNER THEREOF BEING A
THE WESTERLY LINE OF TORO STitEET;
1 TCR SOUTH 400 43• EAST, ALONG SATO POINT
"f POINT O€ BEC IN1ltiltg. WESTERLY LINE OF
TAROLSTRFFT
E 1q0Rrr4i Cr&q ApR j)C)4 ovw 100� 15 mom Ory ljlS
p L CPW-A) A& 4ZAD AND
OF DOCUMENT
I
o � �
i
VISTA REPORT
I
I
I
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
' PROPERTY CLIENT
INFORMATION INFORMATION
' Project Name/Ref#: Not Provided STEVE LITTLE
Downtown Transit Center Secor-San Luis Obispo
1144 Higuera Street 3437 Empresa Dr Ste A
I San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Latitude/Longitude: 35.282359 120.657499
' Site.Olstribution.Summ:ary wm�rnav0 1/010 1/4 to 1/2:10
Mlle 1/4=06 1/2 Moe IMoe
' AgepCY
J.Database-Type#f Records
A)Databases searched to 1 mile:
' US EPA NPL National Priority List 0 0 0 0
US EPA CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Actions. 0 0 0 0
STATE SPL State-,equivalentpriorkYlist 0 0 0 0
' 8) Databases searched toa/2m8e:
' STATE -SCL State equivalent CERCLIS list 0 0 1
US EPA CERCLIS/_ Skesrurrentlyorformerlyunderreview.
NFRAP by US-EPA 0 0 0 -
' US EPA TSD RCRA permitted treatment,storage. -
disposal.facilWes . 0 0 0
STATE REG LUST Leaking-Underground Storage Tanks.
' CID 11 S 7 -
STATE/ SWLF Permitted as.solid waste landfills.
REG/CO incinerators,or transfer stations 0 0 0
STATE DEED RSTR Sites with deed restrictions 0 0 0 -
' STATE CORTESE State index of properties with -
hazardous waste 6 1 0
STATE TOXIC PRS Toxic Pits cleanup facilities 0 0 0 -
' USGS/STATE WATER Federal and State Drinking Water -
WELLS Sources 0 0 0
' C) Databases searched to 1/4 mile: - -
US EPA RCRA Viol RCRA violations/enforcement actions 0 0
' US EPA TRIS Toxic Release Inventory database 0 0 -
STATE UST/AST Registered underground or
aboveground storage tanks 6 3
IFor more information call VISTA Information Solutions, inc. at 1 - 600 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Venivn 1.6.1 Page I7
I
Site Distribution Summary Wit1/8 1/1I Mo 4 T/Ito 1/210ro I
e 1/2 mne 1 mBe
Agency/.Database -Type of Records
D)Databases searched to 1/8 mile: '
US EPA ERNS Emergency Response NotificationL;;
System of spinsUS EPA GNRTR Reneratorstof hazardered lous or wastePILLS State spillslist I
This report meets the ASTM standard E-1527 for standard federal and state government database I
research in a Phase I environmental site assessment. A (-) Indicates a distance not searched because it
exceedsthese ASTM search parameters.
LVAITATIONOFLIABLLrtY prior proceeding wbhan traunaetlon. VKTA I
customer proceeds at its own risk In choosing to rely on VISTA services,In whole or in part,p p 9 Y
cannot be an insurer of life accuracy of the informatbM-errors occurring in conversion of data,or for customers use of data.VISTA and los
affiliated companies,oaicom agents,employees and Independent contractors cannot be held liable for accuracy,storage,delivery.loss
or expense suffered costumer resuhhu 111113 crif 01 Ndhe from a Information provided b VISTA. '
NOTES
I
I
I
I
I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Page I7
Version 2.6.r
I
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
Map of Sites within One Mile
i I n Dr o: Q oCOD
, 's
r- ,r c '% C
N c o°
I 9 r
mo id St :..
I Ivd C
i B n S Mc oil m S Fo
yes el. St
no L ms S
0 o Lune urro t5t c o rfi d t yV�"'•�•
o > 3 ro z••, est St c
F- co issio S o�
s
� 11 ff !�• d r f
I c ,
Mit � r .... . ,
%.P
1 9
CO
er St
o
' N = T En Q�
.-Y th r
�p Me o _ !
n� 0 0 0.25 OS
boa �a
oodb S Miles
I Q�
Category: A B C D
Subject Site Databases Searched to: 1 mi. 1/2 mi. 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi.
I Single Sites ® O
Multiple Sites O ■ ® O
�\ Highways and Major Roads NPL, SPL, CERCLISi RCRA VIOL, ERNS,
Roads CORRACTS NFRAP, TRIS,UST GENERATORS
Railroads (TSD) TSD,LUST,
SWLF,SCL
••'Y•-' '• Rivers or Water Bodies It additional databases are listed in the cover page of the report they ars also displayed
I •��-•�"�' Utilities on this map. The map symbol used corresponds to the database category letter A.B.C.D.
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 -767-0403
I Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Page is
`SITE ASSESSMENT PL" REPORT
Map of Sites within Quarter Mile
c I
N o4
° °
s
9�
P
11 I
r �
Q� hI2c Sti •.
.7 s�
1
I
nnomed
48• ......--
r
5
Jet
0 0.05 0.1
s °a Miles
e�
Category: A B C D
Subject Site Databases Searched to: 1 mi. 112 mi. 114 mi. 1/8 mi.
Single Sites ® 0
Multiple Sites ® O
�\ Highways and Major Roads NPL,SPL, CERCLIS% RCRA VIOL, ERNS,
Roads CORRACTS NFRAP, TRIS,UST GENERATORS
Railroads (TSD) TSD,LUST,
•�•--- SWLF,SCL
Rivers or Water Bodies
II additional databases are listed N the cover page of the report they are also displayed
��'-•�"�' Utilities on this map. The map symbol used urresponda to the database category letter A,B,CA.
For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 800 -767-0403
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Pepe 14
i
SITE- ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
I SITE INVENTORY
A B C D
.PROPERTY AND.THE'ADJACENT;ANEA. a
4
MAP -(within-1/8 mile)
a z 4f
ID - (� w N y d +-
yLSTA ID C3 m K �' eQe H "� H eG
O15TANCEdO �aU W *his 3 of vs WOpa V HoeZd
I "DOlECT10N Z U H H V �- �
KIMBALL MITSUBISHI 30.0030
1A 1144 MONTEREY ST 0.0o A X X Ixt
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
MONTEREY MOTORS 935903
0.00 M 1XI
1A 1144 MONTEREY ST NA
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401
SPRING TOYOTA 3 .00mi
0.00 M X X X X
1B 1144 HIGUERA NA
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
I
CUESTA COLLEGE 1086/3 0.00 M )( 1XI
1B HIGHWAY 1 NA
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93403
SOUTHLAND CORP(FORMER SUP 3767592
cO.Ot M X
1C 1108 MONTEREY w
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
S0030100
UPER 7
1C 1108 MONTEREY Co.ol w 1XI
' SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
37700)
SHELL OIL CO
0.a1 M X X Ix ,
1C 1101 MONTEREY w
' SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
BURTON PHIL (FORMER STAT 6691821
0.01 M d
X
2A 1185 MONTEREY N
' SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
ROSSI PROPERTY 7033391
0.03 9/ X
2B 1200 MONTEREY N
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
I 79815
ROSSI PROPERTY 30.
2B 1200 MONTEREY ST oM
X03o3
N
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
' GROVE MOTORS INC 116B392
0.00 M X
2C 1219 MONTEREY ST
INSAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401WESTSIDE AUTO PARTS INC 319900.00 2C 1232 MONTEREY ST 1XI
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1175512
0.05 Mi x
I 3 1050 MONTEREY ST w
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
I
X = search criteria; •=tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Repoli:April 28,2000
Verson ZA I Page 16
C
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA
6
MAP .(within 1/8 mile) r an WjW
C
TD09
U y H y 3 F
Lu A
VKTA to
_ DIAEClrOJY .'z Md ,&, ~ y z
DISTANCE �',iQ -cu
V: W N •= Yt :� 0 a y iH OC = 6
Lu
GENERAL SERVICES �sorm
3 1039 MONTEREY 0.06M 1XI
w
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
FORMER FIRESTONE STORE 151073
4A 1001 HIGUERA °'0g
'N X 1XI
sw
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
SUNSET CAR WASH NORTH 7291711
4B 1023 MARSH ST o.oeM g
sw
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
RITE AID NO 58200
s .11M
5 1251 JOHNSON AVE o.11 M X
E
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401
HESSLERS UNOCAL 76 4so1213
6 1308 MONTEREY 0.11M X
N
SAN LUIS OBISPO.CA 93401
TOSCO 76 SERVICE STATION /0821 MOM
6 1308 MONTEREY ST X
NE
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRC 111933
7 4650 PALM AVE °.11M g
w
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93408
fib.
NR A- 5 IN11T
' . . - i ' -'i S R *� •'Y 13. �;y1 . ffA ✓ .,c. .�+-�`"tom
M Y tri9wtthm -
` ' JN
y,,�e � aeJ� t 7� ,�µx y�t"!'� I
r Ati vSrolyr .t'.,tom s..-.r. iv. Y �' 1 w', i6i. A' i d f/f ice'
4A by ky �r ri t' 'k i,R 4'a !'1-0 -�i� t _• �.1 j :W' �`�C � H/J
+rt {€ r a r 1t DISTANCE.a a U uj 1z
`d-
_ti..,,' Aw
ffi 7 W b' H
STANLEY MOTORS 0.13M
6 1330 MONTEREY ST .13N X
N
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
VACANT 935901
BA 1371 MONTEREY 0.16 N X
f
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
MONTEREY GAS MART 4034147
8B 1480 MONTEREY 0.10M g X X
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 NE
PACIFIC BELL 315591 '
9 872 MORRO STREET O.IOM X •
w
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401
OLD WATER YARD 935885
10 1330 BUCHON ST 0.22M X
sf
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
I
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
iv Verson 1.6.1 Page/7 I
i
A . . B C D.
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA s
MAP ' _ - (within 1/8 --1/4 mile)
ID z yWo
VISTA TDra a
DISTANCE, d p..� � W Cl U3 p 'K Q Ln *- Z Z
DIRECTION Z. U y H U r. ..d H .0 0 .. '3 C W 0 vii
CLARKS EXXON 4042966
11 656 SANTA ROSA 0�NW X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
DEWAR PROPERTY (SANTA ROSA) AMU
11 656 SANTA ROSA ST °NNW X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
STTESIN-THE SURROUNDINGtAREA'
�i a r ' 1 X19�M1 bd �s
MAP (rufthm Tf4 712 m�2) « xn� 'r 1� '� 1 41 ;°V r4 °i +�
� _• �7 r� -r- y Ii�T t
Wra
.. _ •t-f�iOa � � K,?DISTANCE 37SN 0.ra@CTION
:Z ;t3 ,y 'y V �: 'r gin. C r Z OG ►. W U an;
AMERICAN GAS AND TIRE 64544104
12 1756 MONTEREY ST 0'J1 1 X
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
FIRE STATION i1 1193633
' 13 748 PISMO ST °"TSS, X
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401
VACANT LOT 935696
' 14 641 HIGUERA ST a4 ul X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401 Sw
MAGIC WAND CARWASH 935906
15 1042 OLIVE ST 0.'NW X
' SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 935011
16 2160 SANTA BARBARA AVE 042 1X
SAIT LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
PGE MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT MT•LPJM*7
17 NEAR DANA AND NIPOME ST 0'44 W X
' SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
TEXACO 935914
18 397 SANTA ROSANw X •
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405
18 1COSLEYS ARCO 935916
396 SANTA ROSA 0'4f NW X •
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93405
X = search criteria; - = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
' Velsbn 2.6.1 Page M
A g, C D
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA c
' a
MAP (within 112-;1 mHeJD
) y
0
I
� .V W G < u, ~ r
r.0 bCE J J ,.d O-. � y � 'W � K a C N.;F Z Z ��.
a. Oa V W .w � 3 �+ ..Op . U c ,u+ s ,n
.ORECr10A $ U VVN .� . � H .O V -� 3 C .►�'� W t7 .H
No Records Found '
I
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
X = search criteria, •= tag-along (beyond search criteria). 1
For more information call VISTA information Solutions. Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Repoli:April 28, 2000
Version 1.6.1 Page/9 1
i
A g C D
I a.
UNMAPPED SITES -'
� J J
I C JI= �W. V0. a a rn .yj
J O-. 0 q J '� k Q C. H Z z
VZTA0Z VNH Vyy- � HQV P.- 7 W V H
SLOCO REFUELING FACILITY 4031062
f 1013 KANSAS IXI
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93408 6/503031
I SLOCO REFUELING FACILITY JXJ
1013 KANSAS
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93408 367666
SAN LUIS OBISPO CO X
I RM370 COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93408 64504111
OLD MILL SITE X
' 15231 MILL STREET
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
CALIFORNIA MENS COLONY 61506125
RECEIVING WAREHOUSE X
' SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93409
JAMES F. MAINO 1234921
5201 CLOCK RIDGE Ix
' SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
DALECO RESOURCES MATTHEWS LSE 111319
SEC 32 T31 S R1 3E PARCEL 2 3 X
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
I CAMP SAN LUIS SOLID WASTE SITE 7001942
500 FT W OF O'CONNORWAY ENTRNC X
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
HACIENDA FORD 70031
' 535 N EL CAMINO REAL X X
SAN CLEMENTE CA
TASSAJARA PEAK MICROWAVE STA. 935
91e
I TOWER RD X
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93405
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE 61503016
X
' CAL POLY
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA
OLIVERO PROPERTY ��z91ss
NONE X
' SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
USNG CA CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO 1937153
X
HIGHWAY 1 X X X
' SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403
STATE MILITARY DEPT. OMS!19 4502926
X
HWY1HWY1Y1
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93403
I TARTAGLIA RANCH 4043,438
STENNER CREEK NER CREEK X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions,Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
' Veabn 2.6.1 Page 110
A -8 :: C D
n.
UNMAPPED SITES I
LU
_ W ag
J CL 0J J C o y W X H C N }�. -_
VISTA al Z U.vs .y � �r h d G� < U va oe Z d
.'�. 09 0-M-W C7 H
CALIFORNIA MENS COLONY z7499s9
HWY1 X X X X i
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93449
CAL POLY LANDFILL 3890861
.5 MI ON POLY CNYN RD X I
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA
SAN LUIS OBISPO CNTY AG COMM 3765780
1355 A KANSAS AVE X X
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 i
CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO - NA 7431153
4 000 ACRES 7 MI WE OF SAN X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401 i
SAN LUIS OBISPO CTY DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 367671
COUNTY AIRPORT EDNA RD X X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93406
CDF CAMP CUESTA 4011201
BLDG 962,CAMP CUESTA MP CUESTA X
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93401
USARMY CP SAN LUIS OBISPO 67614 i
SAN LUIS OBISPO X
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93406
CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO NATL GUARD UNIT 67876
HWY 1-7 MI W OFX i
SAN LUIS OBISPO. CA 93406
PROJECT DAIRY CHEDA 7431700
CAL POLY X
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
I
i
I
I
I
X = search criteria; • • tag-along (beyond search criteria).
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Page Ill
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
' DETAILS
' PROPERTY.AND THE ADJACENT.AREA (within 1/8.mile), -
' 1fISTA KIMBAtt MITSUBISHI VISTAJD#: 3199434 �ro
Address': 1144 MONTEREY ST Distance/Direction-0.00 Wil I NA ,,A
SAN LUIS,OBISPO, CA 93401, Plotted as Point
I RCRA-SmGen-RCRA-Small Generator/,SRC#-15 EPA ID: CAD983608605
Agency Address: SAMEASASOV£
Generator CIBSS' Generates 100 tg✓mOnM batLess Men 1000 kg✓month ofnon-ecuteyhateMous
waste
I CORTESE/SRC#53 Agency ID: 2433.00000
Agency Address: KIMBALL MOTORS
1111 MONTEREY
SANWSOBLSPO,CA 931010000
I List Name: MAKING TANK
Site ID: 1433A0000
I Regional LUST-Regional Leaking-Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
MOTORS
Agency Address: 11"ML NTEWS
1114 MONTEREYST
SANWOOBLSPO,CA 99101
' Fac ID: 1133.00000
Leak Report Date: os&"s
Who Reported: MBLER,RK
' Post Remediation Monitoring Began: 04122IN
Leak Detection Method: OINERMEANS
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
I Leak Source: UNKNOWN
Substance: TC£,PCE,ETC.
Remediation Event* MAK STOPPED BY.•OTHER MEANS
' Remediation Status: POSTREMEDL41ACTIONUND£RWAY
Media Affected: OTHER GROUND WATER
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACT/VECASE
'
Region/ District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: MR.FRED KIMBALL
Responsible Pa MR.FRED KWALL
' Description /Comment PRIORITY:MINOR OR NO POTENTIAL WA TER RESOURCE IMPA CIS EXIST,RPSEARCH:
SOL VENIXSTREET.•SANTA ROSA,FACPHONE.COUNTY.•SAN LU60BLSPORPPHONE.•,
RPADDR:744 BUCHON,SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93401
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 A enc ID: 12433
' Agency,Address: KIMBALL MOTORS
1144 MONTEREYST
SAN LUIS OBLSPO.CA 93401
Facility ID: 1433
ILeak Report Date: SIZ611966
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
IVersion 2.6.1 Page 112
o � �
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile):CONT. I
Post Remediation Monitoring Began: 41214994
Substance: rcE
Remediation Status: POSTREMEDLALACTLONMOWOR/NG I
Media Affected: OTHER
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Re ion/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION I
Description/Comment: COUNrY.•SANLUIS OBLSPO
Description/Comment: KSn1EET.•SANTAROSA
Description/Comment- REVLFWDATE.•8/16/1999 I
VISTA MONTEREYMOTORS VISTA ID#r .- 935903 EMepAddreW..: 1144.MONTEREY ST . D stance/Dlrectio.h OAO:MI/NASANLUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Plotted as:; ' - Punt ..
Regional.LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank'/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC=74 I
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 116.00000
Date Discovered: 05116/BB I
Leak Report Date: 05/16188
Who Reported: MAMR.RK.
Pollution Characterization Date: 0845/88 I
Case Closed Date: 1147188
Leak Detection Method: TANK CLOSURE
Leak Cause: CORROSION '
Leak Source•. TANK
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: STOP DATE.•0511B/88 '
Remediation Event: LEAKSTOPPEDBY.•MEMO VECONTEN7S
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: UNDEFINED '
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENCY
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact- MRS.FRED KIMBALL '
RespOrisible Party: MRS.FRED KIMBALL
Description /Comment: PRIM Y.•XSTREEr.•SANTA ROSA.FACPHONE.•05043-1800,COUNTY4ANWS
OMPORPPHONE.-,RPADDR.•744 BUCHON,SAN WE DRISPO.CA 93101
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 lAgency ID: 116
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 116
Leak Report Date: 5/164988 I
Pollution Characterization Date: 8115/1988
Case Closed Date: 11/174988
Substance: GASOLINE I
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: UNDEFINED
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800-767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Vi Version 1.6.1 Page 113 I
IPROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within'l/B mile) CONT.
Lead Agency: tocatAGENCr
Region /District' CENTRA[COASIREGION
IDescription/Comment: COUNrKSANIUSONSPO
Descri tion /Comment XSlREET.SANFA ROSA
Description /Comment: REVIEW DAIE.•B/15/1900
IVISTA SPRINGTOYOTA VISTA401: 3198813 MaPm
Address'; 1144.HIGUERA. Distance/Direction O.00 MI/NA
I SAN*LUIS.OBISPO;.CA 93461 - - Plotted as Point .
RCRA-SmGen-RCRA-Small Generator/SRC# 15 EPA ID: CAD983595778
Agency Address: SAMEASASOVE
' Generator Class' Generates 1001rg✓nonthbutktssthan 1000kg✓monthofnon-acuteo herardous
waste
STATE UST-State Underground Stora e'Tank./SRC#45 EPA/Agency ID: N/A
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
I Underground Tanks: 1
Aboveground Tanks: N07REPORTED
Tanks Removed' NOTREPORTED
I Tank ID: T001U Tank Status: OTMER
Tank Contents' OB(NO/SPECB'IED1 Leak Monitoring: MONRORPRESENI
Tank Age: NOT REPORTED Tank Piping' BARE STEEL
' Tank Size (Units): S50(GA UONS) Tank Material BARESTEE1
Tank ID: t001U Tank Status: OWER
Tank Contents: UN11ADEDGAS Leak Monitoring: MONtTORP&ESENT
' Tank Age' NOIREPORTED Tank Piping: BARESTEEI
Tank Size (Units): 1000(GAILON11 Tank Material: AARESTEE[
CORTESE/SRC#.53 A enc, ID: 2534.00000
I Agency Address: SPRXGTOrO1A
1144 NIGUERA
SAN WSOBSPO,CA
List Name: tEAKOVG TANK
' She ID: 1534.09090
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
' Agency Address: SPRNGTOrorA
1144 MIGUERA Sl
SAN LU5OB6PO,CA SJ401
Facility ID: 1534.00090
' Date Discovered: 01114195
Leak Report Date: 03114i9s
Pollution Characterization Date: 01114195
' Leak Detection Method: 0THERMEA AS
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source'_ UNKNOWN
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: 11AKSTOPPED SKOINERMEANS
Remediation Status: EURTMERSOEASSESSMENIUNDERwAr
Media Affected: 01MERGROUND WAIER
I 'VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:Apra 28,2000
IVersbn 2.6.1 Page/f1
C
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT.
CRWoc9ACnVECASE
Lead Agency: I
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment PRIORITY:WATER RESOURCE OMERTNANDRINKINGWAIERLS/MAYBE I
IMPACTEO,XSTR£ET.•,FACPHONE`,COUNTY.•SAN LULS OBLSPORPPHONF..RPADDR:
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 Agency ID: 2534
Agency Address: SPRING TOYOTA
1111 HIGUERA ST '
SAN LUIS OBLSPO,CA 91401
Facility ID: 2534
Leak Report Date: "411995 I
Pollution Characterization Date: 31f 41199S
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Status' POLLUTION CNA RACTERLTAUON
Media Affected: OTHER I
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment: COUNTY.•SANLUISOBISPO
Descrition/Comment: XSIRE£7.•
Descri tion/Comment: REVIEW DATE:4/1 811 9 9 5
VISTA CUESTA'•COlLEGE . ViSTATD# . .fi 1'D81iT3 Map9R '
ASdress`:- HIGHWAY'1 _ _ ' — ." DistancelDirechori ORf03�11J'NA »- �1
Plottedaas ,T .�Paokat�:.� ».._.��.. ..I B»:
SA'N'1UIS°OBISM-CA83403""'"'"" '
STATE UST-State Underground Storage Tank/SRC#45 EPA/Agency TD: N/A
Agency Address: CUESTA COLLEGE
HIGHWAY 1 I
SAN LIRS OBLSPO,CA 93401
Underground Tanks: 3
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED
Tanks Removed: NOrREPORTED I
Tank ID: TOM Tank Status: ACHMMSERVICE
Tank Contents: DIESEL Leak Monitoring: MONLTORPRESENr
Tank Age: NOTREPORIED Tank Piping: FIBERGLASS '
Tank Sae (Units): 1000(GALLONS) Tank Material: STEEL
Tank ID: m01U Tank Status: ACUM1INSERVICE
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITORPRESENT I
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: FNERGIASS
Tank Sae (Units): 1000(GALLONS) Tank Material: STEEL
Tank ID: TOM Tank Status: ACTIVE/IN SERVICE I
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITORPR£SENT
Tank Age:
NOMPORTED Tank Piping: FIBERGLASS
Tank Size (Units): ZOoo(GALlonrs) Tank Material: STEEL '
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank / EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
Agency Address: CUESIA COLLEGE I
HWY1
SAN LUIS OBISPO,CA 93403
Facility ID: 397.00000
Date Discovered: 03109187
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and 21P. I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800-767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28, .41
Vetion 1.6.1 Page
I1 S
IPROPERTY-AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile)CONT.
Leak Report Date: 03110187
Who Reported: GRUBER,GAY
IPollution Characterization Date: 06119187
Remediation Plan Date: 08117187
Case Closed Date: 01110188
' Leak Detection Method: MNNC[OSURE
Leak Cause: CORROSION
Leak Source: TANK
I Substance: SOLVENT
LEAN STOPPED BY.•REMOVECONTENTS
Remediation Event:
'
ED
Remediation Status: soaCASoN r Media Affected: SOIL LAGfNCY
Lead Agency: LOCALAG
RCENraA[COASTREGION
e ion/District
' ContactDEANCHOAIE
OntaC
Res onsible Pa CUESTA COLLEGE
Description /Comment PRIORITY.•,XMfE7-ofACPHONf.•(803)51I.1913,COUNTY.•SAN
[UBOBLSPORPPHONf.•(60S)SII.j043 RPADDR.HIGHWAY 1,P.O.BOKJ,
' SANLUISONSPO,CA 93403
Coun UST- Coun Underaround Storage Tank:/.SRC#124 A enc ID: 113001
I
Agency Address: CUESTA COLLEGE
SANT
SAN[ULT OBLSPO,CA
Underground Tanks: 3
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED
I Tanks Removed: NOTREPORTED
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 A enc 1D: 1397
Agency Address: CUESTA COLLEGE
SANLYS OBLSPO,CA 83103
Fac ID: 397
Leak Report Date: 311011987
' Pollution Characterization Date: 611.911007
Remediation Plan Date: 811711.987
Case Closed Date: 1/10i19BB
' Substance: SOLVENTS
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected, SOIL ONLr
I Lead Agency: LOCALAGENCr
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description / Comment, COUNTY:SAN LU5OB/SPO
Description / Comment: KSTREEr-
Descri tion / Comment: REVIEW DATE:1/10/1988
' •VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
' Vers[on 1.6.1 Page/16
C
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile)CONT.
VISTA. SOUTHLAND CORP(FORMER SUP VISTA ID 1;- 3767592
Address': 1108 MONTEREY Distance/D'uection <0.01 MI/W
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Plotted as: Point `. I
CORTESE/SRC# 53 A enc 1D: 125.00000
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
List Name: LEAKING TANK
Site ID- 125.00000
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A '
SRC#74
Agency Address: SOUTHLANDCORP(FORMERSUPERY)
108 MONTEREY ST
SANLULSOBLSPO.CA 9301
Facility ID: 125.00000 I
Leak Report Date: 06101187
Who Reported: DOOLAW JACK
Site Assessment Plan Submitted: 11127191 I
Pollution Characterization Date: 11101192
Leak Detection Method: OTHER MEANS
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN I
Leak Source: UNKNOWN
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: NOACNONTAKEN I
Remediation Event: LEAKSTOPPEDBY.•OTHERMEANS
Remediation Status' REO PREMEASSEMMENTWORKPLAN
Media Affected: OTHERGROUND WATER I
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACrIVECASE
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact, BUD GOOD I
Responsible Pa SOUTNLANDCORPORA AON
Description /Comment: PRIORITY.•WA TER RESOURCE OTHERTNANDR/NKINGWATER"AYBE
IMPACIFAXSTREET.•SANTA ROSA.FACPHONE.•,COUNTY.•SAN LUIS
OB5PORPPNONE.•(711)635-7711,RPADDR:S820STONERIDGEMALL ROAD I
SU?f3r0PLEASAN7ON CA 91588
STATE LUST- State Leakinq Underground Stara-e Tank/SRC# 164 1 Agency ID: 1125
Agency Address: SOUTHLANDCORP(FORMERSUPERTI
1108 MONTEREYSr '
SAN LUIS OBLSPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 126
Leak Report Date: 61111987
Site Assessment Plan Submitted: 11,2711991
'
Pollution Characterization Date: 111111992
Remediation Start Date: 811011994
Post Remediation Monitoring Began: 311011098 I
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: NOACAONTAKEN
Remediation Status: POSTREMEDMLACTIONMONITOPING '
Media Affected: OTHER
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Re ion / District CENTRAL COASTREGION '
•VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800-767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Pege 117 '
IPROPERTY ANDTHE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8.mile) CONT.
Description /Comment: COUNTr.•SANLUSOMPO
i
Description /Comment: XSTREET.•SANTA ROSA
Description /Comment: REVIEW DA TE.-11/19/1999
VISTA sUPER7 VISTA ID#�:, 4034144Ptu
iAddress': 1108 MONTEREY Distance/Direction <0.01 MI/w
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401
Plotted as: Point
STATE UST-State Underground Storage Tank /SRC#45 EPA/Agency ID: N/A
iAgency Address: SAMEASABOVf
Underground Tanks: 1
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED
iTanks Removed: Norafpoa�fD
Tank ID:
6300250 Tank Status: NOTAVABABLE
Tank Contents: NOTAVAILABIf Leak Monitoring: UNKNOWN
i Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: NOTAVAILABIE
Tank Size (Units): NOrREPORTED(NOTAVAKABLE) Tank Material: NOTAMASIf
STATE UST-State Underground Storage Tank/SRC#45 EPA/Agency ID: N/A
i
Agency Address: SUPER
7
g y 1591 f BELMONT
FRESNO,CA 93702
Underground Tanks: 3
i Aboveground Tanks: NOTRfPORTED
Tanks Removed: NOMPORTED
Tank ID: 63001SU Tank Status: ACAVEANSERVICE
i Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS leak Monitoring: MONNORPRESENT
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae Units • 10000(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARESMEI
i Tank ID: 63902SIl Tank Status: ACmVEMsERVICE
Tank Contents: OTHER Leak Monitoring: MONITORPRESENT
Tank Age: NOTRfPORTED Tank Piping: ANERGLASS
i Tank Size (Units): 6000(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARESMI
Tank ID: 63002SU Tank Status: ACDVEANSERVICf
Tank Contents: OTNER Leak Monitoring: MON?OR PRESENT
iTank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: FSERGLASS Tank Size (Units): 10000(GALIONSI Tank Material: eaRESTEEL
VISTA 1D#.` 377447 Map>o
i V15TA SHELL OIL CO DistancelDirection'0.01 MI/w
Address•: 1101 MONTEREY
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 P! Point
Point
i
rGgeneraytor
-SmGen - RCRA-Small Generator/SRC# 15 EPAD: CAD981405822
Address: sAMEAsneovE
cClass: Generates 100 k9✓month but less than 1000 kg/month o/non-ecute/y hazardous
waste
i
i
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
iVenbn 1.6.1 Page 118
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8.mile) CONT. I
STATE UST-State Under round Storage Tank /SRC#45 EPA/A enc ID: N/A
Agency Address: JOHNSSHELL I
1101 MONTER£r
SAN LUIS OB5PO,CA 93401
Underground Tanks: 4
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED I
Tanks Removed: NOTREPORTED
Tank ID: 000001 Tank Status: ACUVEIINSERVICE
Tank Contents- On(NOrSPECMDI Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT I
Tank Age: NOT REPORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae (Units): 550(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARESIEEL
Tank ID: 000001 Tank Status: ACUVEMSERVICE '
Tank Contents: UNLEADfDGAS Leak Monitoring: MONITORPRESENT
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae (Units): 11000(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARESIE£L
Tank ID: 000001 Tank Status: ACUVEIINSERVICE '
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae (Units): MOVIGALLONSI Tank Material: SAREMEL
Tank ID: 000001 Tank Status: ACME/1)?SERVICE
Tank Contents: LEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT
Tank Age: NOrREPORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN I
Tank Sae (Units): 11000(GALLDNS) Tank Material: BARESTEEL
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74 I
Agency Address: JOHNSSHELL
1101 MONIEREYST
$AN ME OBLfPO,CA 83401
Facility ID: $1500600 I
Date Discovered: 0841199
Leak Report Date: 08118189
Who Reported: MICHAELSMR'HSt0/RE DE
Case Closed Date: 11101189
Leak Detection Method: TANKCLOSURE
Leak Cause: 0VERA&L '
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: GASOLINEiUNL
Remediation Event: LEA 9STOPPED BY.•REMOVECONTENTS
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: Soa oNLr
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENcr I
Re ion /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: JOHN HALL VLK
Responsible Party: SHELL oB co
Funding: R£SPPARTY
Description / Comment: PRIORLTY:,RPSEARCH.•501VENMIREET.•SANTAROSA,rACPHONE.•(818)881.3400,
COUNTY.SAN LULSOB/SPORPPHONE.' 714510.3365 RPADDR.•
I
I' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - BOD- 787 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Ver bn 1.6.1 Page 119
i
IPROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile)CONT.
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 lAqency ID: 1525
' Agency Address: JOHNSSHELL
1101 MONT£R£YST
SAN 11/5 OBLSPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: Sts
I Leak Report Date: 8/18/1989
Case Closed Date: 11/1/1909
Substance: GASOLINE
I Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: Sol ONLr
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENCY
Re lon / District: CENTRALCOASTREGION
'
Description/Comment: COUNTY.•SAN IU/S08LSPO
Description /Comment: XSTREET.•SANTAROSA
Description /Comment: REVEW DA IF.813011909
VISTA BURTONTHIL (FORMER STAT "' .,. ; VISTA ID.#: -6692821' Mearo
Address*: 1185-MONTEREY Distance/Directs 001AIIN
I SA'N'lUIS.DBISPO CA-.93401- Riotted as.';. Anlnt:..,: ZA
CORTESE/SRC# 53 Agency 1D: 2769.00000
Agency Address: BURTON PHIL(FORMER STAT
' 1165 MONTEREY
SAN LOUIS OBISPO,CA 834010000
List Name: LEAKWGTANK
Site ID: 1769.00000
I Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ . EPA/A.gency ID: N/A
SRC#74
Agency Address- BURTON,PH&(FORMER STATION)
118SMONrEREYST
' SAN LUIS OBLSPO,CA 83401
Facility ID: 1769.00000
Date Discovered: 03/16/96
I leak Report Date: 0311B/91
Who Reported: MICHAEL5MDH
Leak Detection Method: SUBSURFACEMONITOAXG
' Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: UNKNOWN
Substance: GASOLINE,DIESEL
Remediation Event: EXCAVATEANDTREAT
Remediation Event: LEAKSTOPPEDBr.•OTHERMEANS
Remediation Status: NOACWN
' Media Affected: UNDEFINED
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACnVECASE
Re ion / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
I
Responsible Party: PHIL BURTON
Description / Comment PRIOR?r.WATER RESOURCE OTHER THAN DRINKINGWAT£RSAM YBE
IMPACTED,XSTREET.•,FACPHONE.•(805)181-7380,COUNTY.•SAN LUIS
OBLSPORPPHONE.•.RPADDR.•1185MONTEREYST,SANLULSOBLSPO,CA 93401
I
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
for more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 761701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
IVeninn 1.6.1 Page t10
c J i
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENTAREA(within 1/8 Mile)CONT. I
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 iAqency ID: 12769
Agency Address: BURTON,PHIL(EORMERSTADON)
1185 MONTEREYST '
SAN LUS 08LSPO.CA 93401
Fac' ID: I769
Leak Report Date: 311811992
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: ExCAVATEANDTREAr
Remediation Status: NOACUON
Media Affected: UNDEFINED I
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment: COUNTY.-SANLUISOBISPO I
Description /Comment: xSTREET.-
Descrition / Comment: REVIEW DAFT
VISiA_ ROSSIROPERTY VISTA-PROPERTY 7433394 MapID '
Address'.- 12bO MONTEREY Dlstance7Directton 0.103.MIJ'N-
SAN 1UMOBISP.O ,>rA�3401
P1040 �esI•-H Point B: :
Y� ny uM
CORTESE/SRC# 53 A enc :ID.: 2318.00000
Agency Address: ROSSiPROPERTY
1100 MONTEREY I
SAN 1U5OBISPO,CA
List Name: LEAKING TANK
Site ID: 1318.00000
; `�� ROSSI,�ROPERTY
A1 ° 5• 1200 M D N7EREX ST '. = D riceiDaection D.03 lull/#+l
•*r `•' P)Gtt;rd.15 •' ;�6..�'
,.��; = SAN LUIS°DBISP.O, CA�93A01 d1r �, 4 _.�;k _j.
Regional LUST:•Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/, EPA/Agency ID a N/A.
SRC 4
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE '
Facility ID: 2318.00000
Date Discovered: 04111189
Leak Report Date: 0+111189
Who Reported: SANLULsoBaPOCO.NEALT
Case Closed Date: 03101195
Leak Detection Method: TANK CLOSURE
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: TANK
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: IFAKSTOPPED8r.•CLOSE TANK
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENCr '
,Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Res onsible Party: ROBROSSi
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 - 0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
iv Version 1.6.1 Page 121 '
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT.
Description /Comment: PR/OR/TY:UNKNOWN,XSTR£ET.•,FACPHONE.•,COUNTY:SAN LULS OBISPORPPNONE:
RPADDR:
STAikina Under round Storage Tank/SRC# 164 A enc ID: 12318
Agency Address: SAMEASASOV£
Facility ID: 1318
Leak Report Date: u1111989
Case Closed Date: 31111995
Substance: GASOLINE
I Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
'
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGTON
Description/Comment: COUNTY.•SANLUSOBLSPO
Description /Comment: XSTRffT.•
Description / Comment: REVIEW DAT£.-3/16/1993
VISTA GROVE�MOTORS INC ' VISTA M# =': 126'8392, .Wp!Q
Address•: 12J9 M-ONIEREY.ST Distance/Dhection 0 04 Mt_/-N
I SAN LUIS OBISPO.ZA 93401-r _. Plotted as Point'_ ZC.
RCRA-SmGen - RCRA-Small Generator/SRC#..15 EPA ID:. CAD982401.051
Agency Address: SAMfASABOVE
I Agency A dress Generates r00tg✓monthbottenMan l000tg./monMo/non-ecutelyhazardous
Generawaste
VISTA WESTSIDEA'UTO PARTS INC r VISTA IM: 3199435 MaptD'
i.ddress•-' 11232'MONTEREYST -� Dlstance9A.kection 004MI/NE S
' SAN IUIS:OBISPO. .CAt93401=. �` Rlottedmsrp;
RCRA-SmGen-RCRA-SmaBGenerator/SRC# 15.. "EPA.ID:: CA"DJ83501261
I Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Generator Class: Generates 100tg.1monthbutlessthan 1000tg.1mon0ofaon-acetelyharardous
waste
Edress�j
UNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER' ' °'�' VISTAtD# � � -�';71 5.512 !o'
0.MONTEREYST._ Dfstance/Directlod 005M1/'W
LUIS OBISPO;'CA 93401 , LL Plotted ase.. Point
' Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
Agency Address: COW YGOVERNMENTCENTER
' 10S0 MONTEREY ST
SAN 1115 OBLSPO,CA 93108
Facility ID: 113.00000
Date Discovered: 0611488
ILeak Report Date: 06116188
Who Reported: MILLER.R.K.
Remediation Stan Date: 03108189
I Case Closed Date: 07101188
Leak Detection Method: OMERMEANS
Leak Cause: OVERFILL
' Leak Source: TANK
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions,Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751707901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
' Venion 1.6.1 Page 122
PROPERTY AN D THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile)CONT. I
Substance: FUEL Oa
Remediation Event EXCAVAI£ANDDLSPOS£
Remediation Event: LEAXSTOPPED BY.•REMOVE CONTENTS I
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY I
Region /District CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: TO NSON,GENE
Responsible Party: SAN LUIS OBSPO COUNTY I
Funding: RESPPARIY
Description / Comment: PRioam.•xsTREEE•OSOXIACPNONE,(805)si9•s100,COUNTY•SANLUS
OBLSPORPPNONE.•(805)549.5100,RPADDR:1050 MONTEREY,SAN WS OBLSPO,CA
93408
STATE LUST- State Leakin Under round Storage Tank/SRC#164 A enc ID: 1113
Agency Address: COUNTY GO VERNMENT CENTER
TOSO MONTEREYST I
SAN 1 U OBISPO,CA 81108
Fac ID: 113
Leak Report Date: 611611988
Remediation Start Date: 3/e/1989 I
Case Closed Date: Tit/t9ae
Substance: BORER FUEL
Remediation Event EXCA VA TEA ND DISPOSE '
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY I
Re ion/District CENTRAL COAST REGION
Description /Comment• COUNTY:SANLULSOBISPO
Description/Comment xs1RE£7•OSOS '
Description/Comment REVIEW DATE.3/8/1989
VISTA ' GENERAL SERVICES" ; ? rP d as.,-: i • P5ut1t 11 . ,7
Address 1039.MONTEREY ?"
ection 0:06 BUM
W '
SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 9340
STATE UST- State Underground Storage Tank/SRC#45 EPA/A enc in. N/A '
Agency Address: GENERAL SERVICES
1039 MONIER£Y
SAN LUIS OBLSPO,CA 93408
Underground Tanks: I '
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORIED
Tanks Removed: NOTREPORIED
Tank ID: )U Tank Status: ACTIVEIINSERVICE I
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT
Tank Age:
NOTREPORIED Tank Piping: FIBERGLASS
Tank Size (Units): 11000(GALLONS) Tank Material: STEEL
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 600 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 26,
Versron 1.6.1 Pege efZ/1J '
I r �
I PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA'(within 1/8 mile) CONT.
VISTA ID#: 152073 MapID
VISTA FORMER FIRESTONE STORE Distance/Direction 0.08 M1/SW
Address'-, 1001 HIGUERAA
Plotted as: Point
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401.
Agency ID: 2382.00000
CORTESE/SRC# 53
' ONESTORf
Agency Address: 1001 HIGUERA
SAN LU6 08SPO,CA 931010000
List Name: LEAKING TANK
I Site ID: 1382.00000
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N1A
SRC#74
'
Agency Address: fORM£Rf6PESTONfSTOR£
g Y 1001 HIGUERA ST
SAN IUS OBISPO,CA 93401
Facility 10: 1392.00009
' Leak Report Date: 01109193
Contamination Confirmed Date: 01109193
Case Closed Date: 10101193
Leak Detection Metho0THERMEANS
d:
'. Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: UNKNOWN
Substance: casoLlNE
' Remediation Event LEAKSTOPPfOBy'O1NfRMEANS
Remediation Status: CASEC[OSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
' Lead Agency: tOCALAGENCY
Region/District CENTRALCOASTREGION
Contact N.Y.ALA TNLEENASCHfunOW
'
Responsible Party: BRlDGWONEAMESTONEINC.
Description / Comment PRIORRY.LOW,RPSEARCH: T.•
SOLVENTYSTREfOSOS,fACPHONf.•,COUNTY.SAN
LU5096PORPPHONE.•,RPADOR.•1100fLREST0NEPARKWAY,AKRON,ON
' 44317-0001
STATE LUST -State Leakin Underground Storage
lank/SRCi 164 A enc ID: 2382
Agency Address: FORMERfIRESTON1MORE
1001 HIGUERA Sr
SAN IUS OBSPO.CA 93401
'
Facility ID: 1391
Leak Report Date: 2/9/1993
Contamination Confirmed Date: 21911993
I Case Closed Date: 101111993
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Status: cAsfc[os£D
' Media Affected: sol[ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Re ion /District:
CENTRAL COASTREGION
I
Description / Comment COUNTY:SAN LWSOBISPO
Desai tion / Comment: KSTRE£T•OSOS
[Description / Comment: RE VIE WDAIF:919119-03
I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
IVersion 2.6.1 Page 114
C � 1
PROPERTY.-AND THE ADJACENT..AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT.
VISTA SUNSET CAR NIASH_NORTH " VISTAJD#.- - 7291711
Address': 'MA
1023RSH ST DistancelDirection 0:08 MIJ3W '
SAN_LUIS.OBISPO, CA 93401 ' Plotted as Point 46
State Spills/SRC9 79 . EPA/Agency .ID: N/A
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE '
Facility ID: 247
Substance: PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Contact: MR JOE RAML,QEI '
Responsible Party: SUNSErCARWASHNORTN
Description/Comment: PRIOR/TYRESPPARTY SUNSET CAR WASH NORTH,RESPPHONERESPADDR:102J
MARSH ST SAN LU[r OB5PO CA 03401
VISTA RITE AID.N0.5820= ` w . VISTAtID#: 5355354
Address` 1251.JOHNSON AVE-- ~ ~ Dlst"Ice/Dtrection 0:71 MIME
' s P,Iotteds PoTrtt
SAN 1U IS OBISRO; CA'.93401 .�- .. . .. .
RCRA-SmGen -RCRA-Small Generator/SRC#1.5 EPA ID: CA0001007681
Agency Address: sAMEASABOVE
Generator Class: Generates 100tg-lmonthbut less than 10004gJmontho/non-acutetyhazardous '
waste
$Illy _ HESSLERSWh0CAt 76 :� ` t�< " `VISTA'3D#k 450121'3 ' t+aePim
Tidtess'' 13DI3µMON7EREY DLttanceirD3recTlon O x1 Y�[I'7'N'E -
PlottCd4s " I Oint
SAN-
[STATE
OBISPO .'CA:93401 -
STATE UST-State Underground Storage Tank/SRC#45 EPA/Agency ID: N/A
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE '
Underground Tanks: 3
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED
Tanks Removed: NOTREPORTED '
Tank ID: TU Tank Status: AC71VEIINSERVICE
Tank Contents: DIESEL Leak Monitoring: MON17ORPRfSENT
Tank Age: NOTREPORIE0 Tank Piping: EBERGIASS
Tank Size (Units): 12000(GA11ONS) Tank Material: STEEL '
Tank ID: TD Tank Status: AC71VEJINSERVICE
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITORPRESENT
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: AVERGLASS '
Tank Size (Units): 11090(GALLONS) Tank Material: STEEL
Tank ID: IV Tank Status: ACTLVEANSERV/CE
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITORPRESENr '
Tank Age: NOTREPORTED Tank Piping: ELBfRGLASS
Tank Size (Units): 12000(GA UONS) Tank Material: STEEL
1
1
•VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
Vembn 2.6.1 Page 125 '
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT.
IVISTA TOSCO 76 SERVICE STATION #0821 VISTA ID#: 11647620
Address': 1308 MONTEREY 5T Distance/Direction 0.11 MI/NE c
I Plotted as: Point
SAN LUIS'OBISPO, CA 93401 V
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
' SRC#74
Agency Address: SAM. vE
197600090
Facility ID: .00000
Date Discovered: oenei9e
Leak Report Date: 081191,98
Who Reported: SCOTTGRANAM
Leak Detection Method: OTHER MEANS
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: GASOLINE
Quantic / Units: UNKNO Units: NOTREPORMD
Remediation Event: STOP DAIF:08/18/88
Remediation Event: IEAKSTOPPED BY.•0TNERMIA NS
I Media Affected: UNDEFINED
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
I Contact- TINA BERRY
Responsible Party: TOSCO MARKETING COMPANY
Description /Comment: ASTREET.JOHNSON AVE,FACPNONE..COUNTY SANIULf OBLSPORPPNONE.(915J
I 177.1311 RPADDR:PO BOX 5155 SAN RAMON CA 94583
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164. A enc ID: 12976
Agency Address: SAMEASAROVE
Facility ID: 1976
I Leak Report Date: 8119/1998
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Status: LEA K 8EING CONFIRMED
I Media Affected: UNDEFINED
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
'
Description / Comment: COUNTY.-SANLULSOBLSPO
[Description / Comment: XSTREET.•JOHNSON AVE
Descri tion / Comment: REVIEW DATL-
I
I
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
' Version 1.6.1 Page 126
PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile).CONT. I
VISTA SAN DIEGO GAS-AND ELECTRC VISTA IDI: 1179343 Mapw
Address*: 4650 PALM.AVE Listance/Dlrection 0.1.2 M1/.W
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93408 Plotted-as: Point I
ERNS-Emergency Response Notification System /SRCI 8 Agency ID: 1411843
Agency Address: SAN D/EGOGASANDELECTRC
4650 PALM AVE I
SAN DIEGO,CA 91175
Spill Date Time: APRIL 6, 1996 0834.00 AM
Case Number: 431643
Spill Location: 4650PALMAVE
Discharger Name: SAN DIEGO GASAND EUCIRC
Discharger O rg: SAN DIEGO GASAND ELECTRC
Material Spilled: OIL,M5C:TRANSFORMER,50.00(GAL) I
Waterway Affected: SOIL
Fields Not Reported: Soun:eAgency.DLschargerPhone
Air Release: Land Release: Water Release: Ground Release: Facility Other Release: I
Release:
NO No NO NO NO NO
111`6I' —SURROUNDING'AREA'(vritf�fi"t78 -114 Tqlie),? - -'
VISTA ItTANLEY"MOTORS - VISTAi10lEE ^r 3961142'*':
Address': 133D MONTEREY:3T DIstancelDlr+eddon u3 MI-I NE �^• .:, '
_ - d" Plotied Point ` s
SAN 1UIS OBISPO, CA-9i4401 I
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ - EPA,Agency 1D -
SRCI'74
Agency Address: SAMEASAROVE
Facility ID: 414.00000 I
Date Discovered: 01106187
Leak Report Date: 01/08187
Who Reported: MILLERR.K. '
Pollution Characterization Date: 01101187
Remediation Start Date: 10101187
Case Closed Date: 11131187 I
Leak Detection Method: TANKCLOSURE
Leak Cause: OVERFILL
Leak Source: TANK I
Substance: REG GASOLINE
Quantity / Units: U Units: NOTREPORTED
Remediation Event: EXCAVAITANDTREAT
Remediation Event: STOP DATE.-01106167
Remediation Event- LEAK STOPPED 8Y.•REMOVE CONTENTS
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED '
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: CRwoc8ACTIVECASE
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Version 2.6.1 Page 117 I
' SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/.8-1/4 mile) PONT.
Contact: iEFFColl
Responsible Party: SrANLEYMOrORS
Description /Comment- PR/ORpY.•,XSTREFT.,FACPNONE.•(80SIS43-7311,COUNTY.-SAN
I UISOBLSPORPPNONE,•(805)543-7311,RPADDR.•1330 MONTEREY,SAN LUIS
OBISPO,CA 93401
' STATE LUST- State Leaking Under round Storage Tank/SRC#164 jAgency ID: 1414
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 414
' Leak Report Date: 11811987
Pollution Characterization Date: 11111987
Remediation Start Date: 1011/1987
Case Closed Date: 1213111987
Substance: REGIIIAR GASOLINf
Remediation Event: EXCA VA IF A ND WA r
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: SOIL ONLY
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Region/ District: CENTRAL COAS/REGION
Description /Comment- COUNrY.•sANLUSOBLSPO
Description/Comment: XSrREET.-
Description /Comment REVIEW DA/F..•1213111087
LSTA VACANT _ V1STA ID# ; 9359040 MaPm
Address': 1371 MONTEREY Distance/Dhectlon D T6 Mt/Ni
'
ISAN'LilIS OBISPO CA 934D1 Flottetl ash•...; , PoTnY,: $�
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID N/A.
SRC#74
' Agency Address: VACANr
1371 MONMEYSr
SAN LUIS 085PO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 421.00000
' Date Discovered: 05109186
Leak Report Date: 06101186
Who Reported: MILLER,R.K.
' Case Closed Date: 09104186
Leak Detection Method: TANK CLOSURE
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: OTHER MEANS
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: LEAK S70PPEDBY.•REMOVE CONIENTS
' Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: sou oNLr
Lead Agency: CRWOCB A CTIVE CASE
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: C DELMARI/NI
Responsible Party: D11MARTINL C.
I Description / Comment: PRIORITY:•XSTREEr.'PEPPER,FACPHONI.,COUNTY:SAN LULSOBLSPORPPHONE.-
80S 461.1340.RPA DDR:1371 MONTEREY,SAN LUS OBLSPO.CA93401
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701801 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
IVersion 2.6.1 Page/18
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8-1/4 mile) CONT. '
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Stora
VACANank/SRC# 164 A enc ID: 421
Agency Address: 1371 MONTEREY Sr '
SAN LUIS O85PO,CA 93401
Fac O' ID: 417
Leak Report Date: 6/1/1996
Case Closed Date: 9/4/1996 '
GASOI/Nf
Substance: CASE CLOSED
Remediation Status: SOIL ONLY '
Media Affected: REGIONAL BOARD
Lead Agency:
District
COASJRfGION
Re Ion/DlStric
cOUNJY.•JAN LUa O9aPO '
Description /Comment: xsTREET.•PEPPER
Desai tion /Comment: aEVIfwDATE:9EU1996
Descri tion / Comment:
L-STATE
M0NTEREY.GASMART
VISTA ID f4034144ss's 1480MONTEREY; Distance/Direcdon OT4MIINEPlottedSAN LUIS OBISPO CA.93401 .`ST--State Under round Stora a Tank SR
#45 VE
EPA/Agency enc ID. N/A
Agency Address:
Underground Tanks: s '
NOT REPORTED
Aboveground Tanks: NOrR£PORTED
Tanks Removed: ACHVEINSERVICE
Tank ID: 6301 Tank Status: '
LEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONAORPRESENT
Tank Contents: GALVANMEDSTEEL
Tank Age: NorREPORJED Tank Piping:
5068(GALLONS) Tank Material: UNKNOWN '
Tank Size (Units): A07VEANSERV/CE
Tank ID 6300250 Tank Status:
OIL(NOTSPECLFED) Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENT
Tank Contents: 9ARESTEEI
Tank Age: NoraEPORJfO Tank Piping: '
sso(GALLONS) Tank Material: 9ARESTEEI
Tank Size (Units): AC7NE/INSfRVICE
Tank ID: 63oozsu sank Status:
UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MON/TORPRESENT
Tank Contents: BAREST££[
Tank Age: NorREPORTEO Tank Piping:
10000(GALLONS) Tank Material: 9ARESTEEL
Tank Size (Units): ACTIVE/GV SERVICE
Tank ID: 63oozsu Tank Status:
UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONLTORPRESENT
Tank Contents: eaREsrEE[
Tank Age:
No
REPORTED Tank Piping:
woo Tank Material: eaafsTffl
Tank Size (Units): ACTIViiSERVi '
Tank ID: 63o0zSU Tank Status:
DIESEL Leak Monitoring: MONIJORPRESEN1
Tank Contents: 9ARESITEL
Tank Age: NorREPo9rE0 Tank Piping:
Tank Size (Units):
10000(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARfSIfEL
1
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
F '
For more information tail VISTA Information Solutions.Inc. at 1 - B00 -767 -0403.
iv
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Page/19
Ven/on 1.6.1 '
ISITES IN THE SURROUNDING`AREA (within 1/8-1/4 mile) CONT.
CORTESE /SRC# 53 Aci enc ID: 12504.00000
I Agency Address: MONTFRfYGAS MART(KAPLAN)
1180 MONTEREY
SAN LIZ O81SPO,CA 934010000
List Name: LEAKING TANK
I Site ID: 1504.00000
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
I
Agency Address: MONTERfYGAS MART(XAPLAN)1480 MONTERfYST
SAN LULS OBLSPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 1504.00000
Date Discovered: 01116193
Leak Report Date: 01127193
Who Reported: MICNAELSMLTN
Remediation Plan Date: 08115194
ICase Closed Date: 01118198
Leak Detection Method: TANKTfST
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
' Leak Source: TANK
Substance: GASOLAV&DIESEI
Remediation Event: NOACAONTAKEN
' Remediation Event, STOP DATE.•01/16103
Remediation Event: LEAKSTOPPED8Y.•CLOSE TANK
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
I Media Affected: AOUO'fRIMUNICIPAL)
Lead Agency: CRWOCPACHVECASE
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
'
Responsible Party: MR.NARRYKAmAN
Description/Comment: PRIORITY.KNOWN NfATN/SAEETMENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS,RPSEARCN.
SOLVENTXSTREET.•CALIFORNIA,fACPHONE•(805)544.3467,COUNTY.SAN LIM
OBLSPORPPNONE•,RPADDR.•18118 VB.LAGE 18,CAMARILLO CA 93101
' STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage /SRC/164 A enc 'ID: 2504
Agency Address: MONTEREY GASMARTMAPLAN)
1480 MONMREYST
SAN LULL OBLSPO,CA 93401
'
Facility ID: 2504
Leak Report Date: 112711993
Remediation Plan Date: 811511994
Case Closed Date: 1/18/1998
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: NO ACTION TAKEN
' Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: A0UITERAfTECAFD
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
'
Region / District: CENTRALCOASTREGION
Description / Comment: COUNrY.•SANLUISO85PO
Description /Comment: XSTREFT.•CALITORNIA
IDescription / Comment: REVIEW DATE.•311911998
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and IIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions,Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0463.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
' Version 1.5.1 Page/30
I
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 -.1/4 mile)CONT. I
VISTA PACIFIC BELL VISTA ID#: 315587 MaplD.`
Address': 8A FIC BEL STREET Plotted iav irectio 020 Mi/W I
SAN LUIS.OBISPO •CA 93401 Plotted as :'•. Point .;
STATE UST- State Under round Storage Tank/SRC# 45 EPA/A enc ID: N/A
Agency Address: PACOIC BELL(SE-094 I
871 MORRO
SAN I US OB/SPO,CA 93401
Underground Tanks: I
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPORTED '
Tanks Removed- NOTREPORTED
Tank ID: r0alu Tank Status: ACTIVE/INSERV/CE
Tank Contents: DIESEL Leak Monitoring: MONDORPRESENT
Tank Age: NOTR£PORTED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae (Units): $900(GALLONS) Tank Material: BARE STEEL
[Address':.
ISTA OLDWATER:YARD VISTA ID# 93588b
D.istanceloirktion DIZMIVSE .
.
1330BUCHON'ST Plotted . _ Point
SAN-LUMOBISP.O CA 93401 --
Regional LUST-Regional leaking Underground Storage lank 1 EPA/Agency ID: N/A '
SRC#74
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 398.00000 '
Date Discovered: 07108187
Leak Report Date: 07107187
Who Reported- MILLER R.K. I
Pollution Characterization Date: 07110187
Case Closed Date: 04107188
Leak Detection Method: TANK CLOSURE '
Leak Cause: SMUCTUREEAILURE
Leak Source: TANK
Substance: GASOLINE I
Remediation Event: EXCAVATEA NDTREAT
Remediation Event: LEAK STOPPED Br.•REMOVECONf£Nn
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED '
Media Affected: son omr
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENcr
Region/ District: CENTRAL COASTREGION I
Contact- ANNE RUSSELL
Responsible Party: CRYOTSANLULSOBLSPO
DESCriptlOn / Comment- PRIORIM.-XSTREET:JOHNSON,EACPNON£.•(803)549-7140,COUNTr: LS
SANIU '
OBISPORPPNONE. 905 549.7140,RPA DDR:990 PALM,SAN IUISOBLSPO,CA 93401
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank /SRC# 164 lAaency ID: 1398
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 398 I
Leak Report Date: 717119B7
Pollution Characterization Date: 711011987
Case Closed Date: 417IT-88 '
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28,
Version L6.1 Pogo
131 131 I
SITES IN'THESURROUNDING AREA (within'-1/8 -'1/4,M116)CONT.
I
Substance: GASOLINE
I Remediation Event: EXCA VA rf A NO MIA r
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: SOn oNzr
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENCr
IRegion/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment: COUNMSANLWSOBISPO
Description /Comment: KSTREEr.•.IONNSON
Description/Comment: REVIEW DA?Z 417/1808
.VISTA CLARKS-EXXON VISTA IDI.: 4042988Pm
I
Address*: 656 SANTA ROSA Distance/Direction:0.25.M17 NW
SAN LUIS OSISPO CA 93401 - Plotted as:' Point 17.
STATE UST-State Underground Storage Tank/SRC#45 EPA/A enc 9D: N/A
' Agency Address: SAMEASASOVE
Underground Tanks: 4
Aboveground Tanks: NOTREPOxry
I Tanks Removed: NorREPORTED
Tank ID: 63002511 Tank Status: CLOSED REMOVED
Tank Contents: 0THIR leak Monitoring: MONnORPRESENr
' Tank Age: NOTREPORrED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Size (Units): 500(GAL IONS) Tank Material: UNKNOWN
Tank ID: 63001511 Tank Status: CLOSED REMOVED
Tank Contents: LEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONITOR PRESENr
Tank Age: NOrREPORIED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Sae (Units): 8000(GALLONS) Tank Material: UNKNOWN
' Tank I0: 63002511 Tank Status: CLOSED REMOVED
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONRORPRESENr
Tank Age: NOTREPORIED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
I Tank Size (Units): 8050(GALLONS) Tank Material: UNKNOWN
Tank ID: 6300511 Tank Status: CLOSED REMOVED
Tank Contents: UNLEADED GAS Leak Monitoring: MONnoRPRESENr
I Tank Age: NOTREPORIED Tank Piping: UNKNOWN
Tank Size (Units): 8000(GALLONS) Tank Material: UNKNOWN
VISTA DEWAR PROPERTY (SANTA'ROSA) VISTAID#:' 935917' ^AePtD
' Address': 656 SANTA ROSA ST `. DistarIce/Directiory 0.25 MI NW
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Plotted as: Point
I Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC# 74
Agency Address: SAMfASABOVf
Facility ID: 419.00000
I Date Discovered: OB117187
Leak Report Date: 08117187
Who Reported: MILLER,RAND r
' Pollution Characterization Date: OB12Si87
I ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
IVen bn 1.6.1 Page 132
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within:1/8 - 1/4 mile) CONT. I
Remediation Plan Date: 03111189
Case Closed Date: 11/09/00
Leak Detection Method: TANK CLOSURE I
Leak Cause: STRUCTUREFABURE
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: GASOLINE I
Remediation Event: LEAK SIOPPEDBY.•REMOVECONIENZ
Remediation Status: CASFCLOSED
Media Affected: OTHER GROUND WA TER '
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACnVECASE
Region/ District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: JACK DEWAR I
Responsible Part : DEWAR.JA
Description/Comment PRLORUY.•,XSTREfT.•WALNUT,FACPHONE.•(906)S43-0180,COUNrY.•SANLIIS
OBSPORPPHONE.•(80S)S43-0190,RPADDR:7S PRADO ROAD,SAN LUS OBSPO,CA '
93401
STATE LUST-State Leaking Under round Storage Tank/SRC# 164 Agency ID: 419
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 419 I
Leak Report Date: 811711.907
Pollution Characterization Date: 812511907
Remediation Plan Date: J11111989 I
Case Closed Date: 111911990
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED I
Media Affected: OTHER
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Re ion/District.. CENIRALCOASTREGION '
Description/Comment: COUNTY.•SAN LYS085PO
Description /Comment XSTRfET.•WAINUI
Description / Comment: REVIEW DA7E.•3/11/1989 I
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 114. ,1112rnl ) '
VISTA AMERICAN GAS AND TIRE VISTA JD# 84
i 54411)4 MaPw
Address': 1756 MONTEREY S7 Dislance/Direction 03417/NE.- ' ` I
SAN LUIS OBISPO;CA 93401 - Plotted as. • Point---
STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage an /SRC# 164 A enc ID: 3073
Agency Address: SAME ABOVE '
Facility ID: 3073
Leak Report Date: 2/3/1999
Substance: GASOLINE '
Remediation Event: EXCAVAIFANDDISPOSE
Remediation Status: LEAK BEING CONFIRMED
Media Affected: UNDEFINED '
IVISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
iv
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
Veabn 2.6.1 Page/33 I
i
ISITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 1/2 mile) CONT
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
I
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description /Comment: COUNTY.•SANLUISOBISPO
Description /Comment: XSMEET.•GRAND AVE
I
Description /Comment: REVIEW DAIF-
VISTA FIRE STATION #1 VISTAID# 1293833P.�
Address':. 748 PISMO ST " DistancelDfirection 0.35 MI/SW
' SAN 11.11S OBISPO, CA 93401. . : paotted,as , ;:, Point
Regional LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
' Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 737.067000
Date Discovered: 11129189
' Leak Report Date: 11129189
Who Reported: St0£BIEDEPT
Case Closed Date: 03126M
I Leak Detection Method: TANK TEST
Leak Cause: CORROSION
Leak Source: TANK
' Substance: wAST£OB
Remediation Event: 1EAKSTOPPEDBY.-REMOVE CONTENTS
Remediation Status: CASECIOSED
I Media Affected: ' son ONLY
Lead Agency: IOCALAGENCY
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTR£GION
' Contact: MICHAEL SMITH
Responsible Party: C17rOEUNLUISOBISPO
Description /Comment: PRIORITY.,RPSEARCH.SOLVENTZMEET.•GARDENSTREET,FACPHONE.
(80S)S49.7380,COUNTY.•SAN LULS OBLSPORPPHONE.•(SVS)S49.7.180,RPADDR-990
' PALM STREET S10 CA 93401
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank)SRC# 164 A enc .ID: 1732
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
I
Facility ID: 731
Leak Report Date: 1112911989
Case Closed Date: 312611992
I Substance: WASTE OIL
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: SOI[ONtr
' Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTR£GION
Descri tion / Comment: COUNTY:SAN IVIS OBISPO
I Description / Comment: XS1REET.GARDENSrREET
Description / Comment: REVIEW DA 7F.-312511.991
I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 - 0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
Version 1.6.1 Page/34
0 i
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 -1/2 mile).CO:NT. I
VISTA VACANT LOT VISTAID# 935898 MeP -
Address': 641 HIG.UERA'ST Olstance/Direction 0.4.0 full./:5w
Plotted as Point I
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA_93401'-
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC# 74 I
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE
Facility ID: 394.00000
Date Discovered: 01128187
Leak Report Date: 01/28/87 I
Who Reported: MILLER,RANDY
Case Closed Date: 03104187
Leak Detection Method: rANK CLOSURE I
Leak Cause: SIRUCIURE£A/LURE
Leak Source: TANK
Substance: GASOLINE I
Remediation Event: EXCAVATEAND DLSPOSE
Remediation Event: LEAK STOPPED BY:REMOVECONIENTS
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED I
Media Affected: 0rNERGROUND WAMR
Lead Agency: LOCAIAGENCY
Region /District: CENTRAL COASrREGION '
Contact: LEO MICNAND
Responsible Party: MIDIANDPACI£IC
Description /Comment: PRIORRY.•,XSTREET.NIPOMO,£ACPNONE.•,COUNTY.54NL1/5OB5PORPPNONE.• I
OS SI1-3848,RPADDR:1800 SANTA BARBARA,SAN LU5 OBISPO.CA 93401
STATE LUST-State Leaking'Unde round.Stora e'Tank/SRC#-164 A enc 1D: 1394
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVf
Facility 1D: 394 '
Leak Report Date: 11281108E
Case Closed Date: 31411987
Substance: GASOImf I
Remediation Event: EXCAVArEAND DISPOS£
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: DINER '
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region / District: CENTRAL COASrR£GION
,Description / Comment: COUNrY.•SANIUISOBISPO I
Descri tion / Comment: XSrREET•NIPOMO
Descri tion / Comment: REVIEW DATE.2141198B
I
I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
iv
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
Velmn 2.6.1 Page 135 I
C
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within-1/4=1/2 mile) CONT.
VISTA.ID#: 935906 '
VISTA MAGIC WAND.CARWASH
Address': 1042 OLIVE ST Distance/Direction 0.42 MI/NW
5
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405
Plotted.-as: Point
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC# 74
SN
1012 OLL/VEIVESSTT
Agency Address: MAG/ ARWA
SAN LUIS OBLSPO,CA 93401
417.00000
Facility ID: 04123187Date Discovered:
Leak Report Date: 94127/67
Who Reported: MILLER,R.K
Pollution Characterization Date: OWS197
Remediation Plan Date: 11118187
Remediation Start Date: 03101186
Case Closed Date: 93111199
Leak Detection Method: UNKNANN OWN OSURE
U
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: LEAK STOPPEDBY.•REMOVE CONTENTS
' iation Status: CASECtOSED
Remed
Media Affected: oTHERGRouND WA TER
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACTIVECASE
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: STANLfYNGSON
Cont
Responsible a PartNELSONR£AXY
' Description/Comment PRIORHY.•WRf£T.•SANMROSA,fACPHONE.•.COUNTY.•SAN IUIS
OBLSPORPPHONE.(80Sg43-1657,RPADDR.•968 MONrEREYSTRfET.SAN
LULSOBLSPO.CA 93401
STATE LUST-State LeakingUnderground Stora a Tank/SRC#164 A enc ID: 417
Agency Address: MA GIC WANDCARWASN
1041 OLIVE ST
SAN 11/5O85PO,CA 93401
Facilit ID: 417
' Leak Report Date: 412711987
Pollution Characterization Date: 612511987
Remediation Plan Date: 1211811987
Remediation Start Date: 31111988
Case Closed Date: 311111989
GASOLI
Substance: NE
Remediation Status: CASECLOSfD
Media Affected: onlfR
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Re ion / District:
CENTRAL COASTREGION
D6SCri tion/ Comment: COUNTY:SAN LUIS085PO
Descri tion / Comment: xsTREfT:sAN7ARosA
I
Description/ Comment:
REvIEwDATE:3�11/1989
I
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report►D: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
IVersion 2.6.1 Page 136
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 -1/2 mile)CONT
VISTA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. VISTA ID#: 935913 nnapw
Address•: 2160 SANTA BARBARA AVE Distance/Direction 0.42 MI/S I
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 Plotted as . Point
Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC/ 74 I
Agency Address: SOUTHERNCAL/EORNM GAS CO.
1160 SANTA BARBARA ST
SAN LUS OBISPO,CA 91101
Facility ID: 11+.00000
Date Discovered: 06107198 '
Leak Report Date: 06107188
Who Reported: MILLER,R.K.
Pollution Characterization Date: 08/17/88 I
Case Closed Date: 05/01/96
Leak Detection Method: OTNERMEANS
Leak Cause: UNKNOWN '
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: EXCAVATEASO MEA T I
Remediation Event IEA9S70PPEDBY.•0MER MIA NS
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: SOR ONLY I
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: CAROL J.DEBLASIO I
Responsible Party: SOUTHERNCAL60RS14 GAS
Description/Comment: PRIORMY.•,XSTREE7.•BROAD,EACPNONE.•,COUNIY.•SANLU60BLSPORPPMONE.•
213 698.7001,RPADDR:P.O.SOXJII97fRMNAI ANNEX,LOSANGELES.CA 90051 I
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC/164 A enc..ID: 114
Agency Address: SOMMERNCALITORN/A GAS CO.
1160 SANTA BARBARA ST
SAN L US OBLSPO,CA 93101
Facility ID: 114
Leak Report Date: 6/711988
Pollution Characterization Date: 8111/1888
Case Closed Date: 611/1896 '
Substance: GASOLINE
Remediation Event: EXCAVATEANDTREA7
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED I
Media Affected: Son ONLY
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region /District: CENTRAL COASTREGION I
Description / Comment: C0UNTY.•SANLVIS OBISPO
Descri tion / Comment: XSMET•BROAD
Descri tion / Comment: REVIEW DA W.8111/1888 I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc, at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
ivi Version 1.6.7 Page 137 '
i D
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4-1/2mile)CONT.
VISTA PGE MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT MT-LP-SLO-2. VISTA ID#: 3079546 Mepro
Address': NEAR DANA AND NIPOME ST Distance/Direction 0.44 M11 W 7
' SAN LUIS OBISPO,-CA 93401 Plotted as:..,- Point
SCL- State Equivalent CERCLIS List/SRC# 112 Agency ID: 40490012
Agency Address: PGE MANUFACTURED GASPLANTMT-[P-SL
NEAR DANA AND NPOMESIRfET
SAN L UIS OBLSPO,CA 93401
Status: UNKNOWN
Facility Type: NOTAVAIIABLE
Lead Agency: UNKNOWN
State Status: PREilMINARYASSESSMENTREOURED/RECOMMENDED
Pollutant 1: UNKNOWN
Pollutant 2: UNKNOWN
Pollutant 3: UNKNOWN
VISTA TEXACOVISTXIN 93591.4 McPm
Address': 397 SANTA ROSA Distant:eLDlrection 0.46 MI lNW o
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405_ Plotted,.as: Point - O
I Regional LUST- Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency ID: N/A
SRC#74
Agency Address- ABANDONED TEXACO(SANTAROSA)
' 397 SANTA ROSA ST
SANIULSOBLSPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: $28.00000
Date Discovered- 04110186
Leak Report Date: 04110186
Who Reported: MLLLER,RAND Y
Contamination Confirmed Date: 04110186
I Pollution Characterization Date: 06102187
Remediation Start Date: TWO187
Post Remediation Monitoring Began: 06110188
Case Closed Date: 07123190
Leak Detection Method: TANKCLOSURE
Leak Cause: STRUCTUREFAaURE
Leak Source: PIPING
Substance: WASTEOILIGAS02
Quantic / Units: 1000 Ung: NOTRfPORTfD
Remediation Event: PUMP AND TRfAIGROUNDWAMR
Remediation Event: LEAKSTOPPEDBY.•CLOSETANK
Remediation Event: fNfORCEMENT.•WARN)NGTOUNCOOPERATIVE RP
' Remediation Event: fNfORCfMENTDATE:051291B6
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: OTHER GROUND WATER
Lead Agency: CRWOCBACTIVECASE
Region / District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Contact: WARK,BOB
Responsible Party: 1EXAC0
' • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
iv
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
Version 2.6.1 Page/JB
OO
SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 -1/2 trifle)CONT,
Description /Comment: PRIORITY.-XSTRFET.•OLIVE.fACPNONf.( J •,COUN7Y SAN LU50B/SPORPPNONE:
818 SOS•II79.RPADOR:f0 UNNfRSAI COY P[AIA,UNNFRSAL CITY CA 91808
STATE LUST - State Leakin Under round Stora a Tank /SRC# 164 A enc ID: 526
Agency Address: ABANDONEDTEXACO(SANTA ROM)
397 SANTA ROSA ST
SAN L ULS OBISPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 518
Leak Report Date: 411011986
Contamination Confirmed Date: 411011986
Pollution Characterization Date: 61111987
12118/1987
Remediation Start Date:
Post Remediation Monitoring Began: 611011988
9.90
Case Closed Dat7/13/1e: OIL
Substance: WASTE OIL
PUMPAND TRFATGROUND WATER
Remediation Event:
Remediation Status: 9 1
CASECLOSED I
Media Affected: REGIONAL BOARD
Lead Agency:
CENTRAL COAS7REG/ON
Region/ District '
Description / Comment:
COUNTY SAN LUIS OBSPO
xsTREET.•OLIVE
Descri Gon / Comment: RFVIEwDATE•7i13/1990
DescriUon/Comment:
.1tISTAMP. 935916«^: rAaplD
[A, d,ress*:
COSLEYS ARCO D;istanceJDtrectioni 0,46i♦lIl/'NIIII
396 SANTA ROS[ Plotted-as:;.
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405 .
nal LUST-Regional Leaking Underground Storage Tank/ EPA/Agency]D: N/A
74
O STA WN
Agency Address: 396 SANTARO
396 SANTA ROS[Sr
SAN IV5 081SPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 115.00000
Date Discovered: 12117187
Leak Report Date: 05127188
Who Re Orted: MILLER,RANDY
Contamination Confirmed Date: 11117ie7
Pollution Characterization Date:
12/18/87
Remediation Plan Date: 02116190
Case Closed Date: 06101190
Leak Detection Method:
SUBSURfACF MON/TOR/NG
Leak Cause: ovf8fic[
LANK '
Leak Source: GASOLINE
Substance:
Remediation Event: LEAK STOPPED er:REMOVE CONTENTS
CASE CLOSED '
Remediation Statliv O1NfRGROUNDWATER
Media Affected:
CRWOCB ACT/VE CASE
Lead Agency:
Region / District: CFNTRAL COASTRfG/ON
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
00
iv
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, .43
Pagee/39
Version 2.6.1 '
ISITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 =1/2 mile)CONT.
Contact- nMPO17ER
Responsible Party: ARCO ITIM POMP
I Description/Comment: PRLORITY.•,XSTRFFhOLIVE.EACPHONE.•,COUNIY.•SANLULSOBLSPORPPNONf.-
113 486-1824,RPADDR.•395 SANTA ROSA STRffT,SAN LU508aPO,CA 93401
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank /SRC# 164 A enc .ID: 1115
I Agency Address: ARCO STATION
396 SANTA ROSA ST
SAN LUIS 0BLSPO,CA 93401
Facility ID: 115
I Leak Report Date: 612711988
Contamination Confirmed Date: 1211711987
Pollution Characterization Date: 1211811987
I Remediation Plan Date: ZM/1990
Case Closed Date: 61111990
Substance: GASOLINE
I Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: OTHER
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
'
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment: COUNTY.•SANLUI508LSPO
Description /Comment XSTREfI.OLIVE
' Description /Comment: REVIEW DATf.•811711989
-SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 112., 1 mite.) }
No Records Found
I
I
I
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0103.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
' Version 1.6.1 Page 140
UNMAPPED SITES
I
VISTA DALECO .RESOURCES MATTHEWS LSE VISTA ID1-. 112329
Address': SEC 32431S R13E PARCEL.2 3:
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
NFRAP/SRC# 18 EPA ID: CAD980694111
Agency Address: SAMEASABOVE I
EPA Region: 9
Congressional District: °
Federal Facility: Agency code(1 I
Facility Ownership: UNKNOWN
Site Incident Category: unknown
Federal Facility Docket: SITE IS NOTINCL UDED0NTNEDOCKET I
NPL Status: NOTON NPL
Incident Type: Unknown
Proposed NPL Update #: ° I
Feral NPL Update#: °
Financial Management System ID: NOTR£PORTED
Latitude:
Longitude: °
Lat/Long Source: Agency Code(1
Lat/Long Accuracy: Unknown I
Dioxin Tier Unknown
USGS Hydro Unit: 18060006
RCRA Indicator Unknown I
Unit Id: °
Unit Name: ENARESNE
Type: D5covERr Lead Agency: EPAFUND4/NANCED
Qualifier. UNKNOWN Category: Unknown I
Name: NOTREPORTED Actual Start Date: NOTREPORTED
Plan Status: Unknown Actual Completion UNKNOWN I
Date:
Type. PREL/kl/NARYASSESSMENT Lead Agency: EPAfUNDf/NANCED
LOWER PRIORITY Category: Unknown
Qualifier: Cate o '
Name: NOTREPORT£D Actual Start Date: NOTREPORTED
Plan Status: Unknown Actual Completion UNKNOWN
Date:
Type: SCREENING S/r£INSPECT/ON Lead Agency: EPAfUND-F/NANCED '
Qualifier: NOFURTN£RREMEDIAL ACTION Category: Unknown
PLANNED Actual Start Date: NOTREPORTED
Name: NOTREPORT£D
Actual Completion UNKNOWN
Plan Status: Unknown
Date:
I
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc.at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report: April 28,
Version 1.6.1 Pagee.44/I r I
i
UNMAPPED SITES'CONT.
VISTA-[D#-. 7004842
VISTA CAMP SAN LUIS SOLID WASTE SITE
I Address': 500 FT W OF O'CONNORWAY ENTRNC
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
WMUDS/SRC# 68 A enc ID: 3400301001
' SAMf AS ABO Vf
Agency Address: 40AA•0009
Solid Waste Inventory System ID:
SOl/D WASTES/IES-CLASS U/•Landrdls for nonharardous solid wastes.
Facility Type:
' Facility In State Board Waste Discharger No
System:
Chapter 15 Facility: No
Sold Waste Assessment Test Facility: No
' Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility: NO
RCRA Facility: No
Department of Defense Facility: NO
' Open To Public: No
Number Of Waste Management Units: I
NOT REPORTED
' Rank:
Enforcements At Facility: res
Violations At Facili YES
' Fde
HACIENDA"FO.RD , u1STATD#^: 7004821
535 N EL CAMINO &EAL M
SAN CLEMENTE, CA {
' C# 68� -. A enc D: 3 400000NO3
dress: WALIERRANCN
N/GNWAYONE
SAN LUS OB/SPO,CA
e Inventory System ID: NorREPORTfDAGRICULTURAL-raCEN&s Char Oval and/or dispose olthe wastes assoGated wRh
e: conrmed and concendated an6Ma/Teed/ng,confined animalhohJmg,conri ted
and concentrated aquadc anana/producdon&CA WS,and aquacaftwe. rhe
' treatment and/or dispoa/ofagdcuLWrel return waterh included In Mir category.
Facility In State Board Waste Discharger No
System:
' Chapter 15 Facility: No
Solid Waste Assessment Test Facility: NO
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility: No
RCRA Facility: No
' Department of Defense Facility: No
Open To Public: No
Number Of Waste Management Units: t
' Rank: NOTR£PORTED
Enforcements At Facility: No
Violations At Facility: No
I
I
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Page 142e
' Version 1.6.t
UNMAPPED SITES-CONT.
VISTA TASSAJARA PEAK MICROWAVE STA. VISTA1D#:. . 935918
- I
Address': TOWERRD '
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93405
STATE LUST-State Leaking Under round Storage Tank /SRC#164 Agency ID: A 411
Agency Address: SAMEASAaoVE
Facility ID: 411 '
Leak Report Date: 11/4/1986
Pollution Characterization Date: 312611987
Remediation Start Date: 312611987 I
Case Closed Date: 11311987
Substance: UNLEADED GASOLINE
Remediation Event: EXCA VA IT A ND DISPOSE I
Remediation Status: CASECLOSED
Media Affected: solL ow r
Lead Agency: LOCALAGENcr I
Re ion/District. CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description/Comment- COUNTr.•SANLULsoeaPO
Description/Comment: Xs7RE£7.•N/GNWAr 101 '
Description/Comment: REVIEW DATE,311 611 9 8 7
A 0LIVERO-PROPERTY.
ddress': .NONE'
- SAN LUIS:OBISPO, CA 93401-_
WMUDS.%-SRC# 69 Agency'ID 3 400000Nf19
Agency Address: OLIVEROPROPERTr
NONE
SAN LUIS 08PS0,CA 93401
Sold Waste inventory system ID: NOMPORTED
Fa cilty Type: INDUSTRIAL-fecAWs that Mat andlordlspose oflquld orsemboi d wastes from
anyservidng,producing,manufactunhg orproces-dw operation of
whatevematum,1nchrd/ng mining,gravel washing,geothermal operations ar
conditioning,sh/p balding and cepa ft,of production,storage and dsposal I
operations watenvelpumping.
Facility In State Board Waste Discharger NO
System:
Chapter 15 Facility: No
Solid Waste Assessment Test Facility: No
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility: No
RCRA Facility: No I
Department of Defense Facility: No
Open To Public: No
Number Of Waste Management Units: 1 '
Rank: NOl REPORTED
Enforcements At Facility: No
Violations At Facility: No '
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Page 143 '
' UNMAPPED SITES CONT:
VISTA USNG CA CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO VISTA ID#, 49371.53
'
Address*: HIGHWAY 1
SAN LUIS OBISPO,-CA 93403
STATE LUST-State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 Agency ID: 101
' Agency Address: CAMPSANLUS
HWY1
SAN L UIS OBLSPO,CA 93406
Facility ID: 101
' Leak Report Date: 121811087
Pollution Characterization Date: 12/1011987
Substance: GASOLINE
I Remediation Status: POLLUDONCHARACTERIZATION
Media Affected: UNDEFINED
Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
IDescription / Comment: COUNTY.•SANLUaoBLSPO
Description / Comment: KSTREEk
Description /Comment: REVIEW DATE.•1211011087
VLSTA CALIFORNIA-MENS COLONY C VfSTAJD#, 2749959
Address•: HWY1
I SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93449_
SCL-State Equivalent CERCLIS List/SRC# 112 Agency ID: 40920001
Agency Address: CALIFORNIA MENS COLONY
'
SANL
SAN LULS OB6P0,CA 93109
Status: UNKNOWN
Facirity Type: NOrAVARA81E
Lead Agency: IIN'NaWN
State Status: FORMER ANNUAL WORKPLAN SITE,REFERRED TO RWQC8
Pollutant 1: UNKNOWN
' Pollutant 2: UNKNOWN
Pollutant 3: UNKNOWN
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank/SRC# 164 lAqency ID: 191
' Agency Address: CAILFORNM MENS COLONY
HWY1
SAN LUIS OB5PO.CA 93401
Facility ID: 91
I Leak Report Date: 711+11988
Pollution Characterization Date: 81911988
Case Closed Date: 21111989
' Substance: DIESEL
Remediation Status: CASE CLOSED
Media Affected: UNDEFINED
I Lead Agency: LOCAL AGENCY
Region/District: CENTRAL COASTREGION
Description / Comment: COUNTY.-SAN LUIS OBISPO
IDescription / Comment: KSTREFT
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc.at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
' Version 2.6.1 Page 144
UNMAPPED SITES CONT. I
[Description /Comment: REVIEW DAIE.•1115119B9
VISTA CAL POLY LANDFILL VISTAJD# 3890862
Address': :5 MI ON POLY CNYN RD
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
STATE SWLF -Solid Waste Landfill/SRC# 163 Agency ID: 40-CR-0004
S I
Agency Address:
.S M/OON NPO POL rY cA CANYON RD
SANLU/SOB/SPO.CA '
Facility Type: SOLID WASTEDLSPOSA[£ACIL?Y
Facility Status: CLOSED
Permit Status: OWER
VISTA SAN LUIS OBISPO CNTY AG COMM VISTA IDI'- 37657.60 '
'Address*: 1355'A KANSAS AVE
SAN'LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 '
STATE LUST- State Leaking Underground Storage Tank!SRC# 164 Agency ID 2232
Agency Address: SANLULSOBLSPOCOUNTY
13SS XANSASAVE '
SAN LULS OBLSPO,CA 93105
Facility ID: 1131
Leak Report Date: 713111991
Case Closed Date: 1113111991 I
Substance- WAST£Oft
Remediation Status: CASMOSED
Media Affected: OTHER I
Lead Agency: REGIONAL BOARD
Region/District-- CENTRAL COAS7R£GLON
Descri tion /Comment: COUN1Y.•SANLu5o9LSPO '
Descri tion /Comment: ASnrEET-
Desc ' tion /Comment: REVIEW DA 1f•311611993
I
I
I
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. '
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 600 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Page!IS '
UNMAPPED SITES CONT.
VISTA SAN LUIS OBISPO CTY DEPT OF AGRICULTURE VISTA ID#: 367671
Address': COUNTY AIRPORT EDNA RD
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406
CORRACTS/SRC# 14 EPA ID: CAT000624213
I Agency Address: SAMEASA80VE
Prioritization Status: WOIREPORrED'
RCRA Facility Assessment Completed: No
Notice of Contamination: No
Determination of need For a RFI (RCRA No
Facility Investigation):
RFI Imposed: No
' RFI Workplan Notice of Deficiency Issued: No
RFI Workplan Approved: NO
RFI Report Received: No
' RFI Approved: No
No Further Corrective Action at this Time: No
Stabilization Mesaures Evaluation: No
I CMS (Corrective Measure Study) No
Imposition:
CMS Workplan Approved: No
' CMS Report Received: NO
CMS Approved: No
Date for Remedy Selection (CM No
' Imposed):
Corrective Measures Design Approved: No
Corrective Measures Investigation NO
Workplan Approved:
Certification of Remedy Completion: No
Stabilization Measures Implementation: No
' Stabilization Measures Completed: No
Corrective Action Process Termination: NO
VISTA USARMY CPSAN LUIS OBISPO VISTA ID#: 67824
Address': SAN LUIS OBISPO
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406
NFRAP /SRC# 18 EPA 1D: CA8572890095
' Agency Address: CAMP SANLULSOBTSPO NAIL.GUARD UNIT
NWY 1•7M W.Of SAN LUIS O81SPO
SAN LUIS 081SPO,CA 93106
Alias Name: PRE VIOUSEPA TDlCAD 9808B2773
I Alias Street: NOTREPORTED
Alias City: NOTREPORTED Alias Latitude: 0
Alias Zip: NOTREPORTED Alias Longitude: 0
I Alias State: CA
Alias Description: PREVIOUSEPAIDIAZD981416977
Alias Name: U.S.ARMY
IAlias Street: NOTREPORTED
VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28, 2000
Version 1.6.7 Page II6
C i
UNMAPPED SITES CONT.
Alias City: NOTRfPORTfD Alias latitude: 0 I
Alias Zip: NOTREPORTED Alias Longitude: 0
Alias State: CA '
Alias Description: PREVIOUS EPA IDlAID991l16977
EPA Region: 9
Congressional District: 0 I
federal Facility: Agency code()
Facility Ownership: UNKNOWN
Site Incident Category: unknown I
Federal Facility Docket: SITE IS NOTINCLUDfDONTNEDOCKET
NPL Status: NOTONNPL
Incident Type: Unknown I
Proposed NPL Update is 0
Final NPL Update 0: 0
Financial Management System ID: NOTREPORT£D '
Latitude: 0
Longitude: 0
Lat/Long Source: Agency CodeO I
Lat/Long Accuracy: Unknown
Dioxin Tier Unknown
USGS Hydro Unit: 18060006 '
RCRA Indicator. rES(RCRAFACAffr)
Unit Id: 0
Unit Name: ENARfS/TE
Type: D5covmr Lead Agency: STA M,FUND FINANCED
Qualifier: UNKNOWN Category: unknown
Name: NOTREPORTED Actual Start Date: NOTREPORTED
Plan Status: Unknown Actual completion UNKNOWN
Date:
Type: PRELIMINARYASSESSMENT Lead Agency: STATE AVNDfINANCED
Qualifier: LOWERPRiORITY Category: Unknown '
Name: NOTREPORTED Actual Start Date: UNKNOWN
Plan Status: Unknown Actual Completion UNKNOWN
Date
Type: SCREENING SITE INSPECTION Lead Agency: fPAfUNO-FINANCED
0
NO FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTION Cate Unknown
Qualifier- PLANNED Category: '
Actual Start Date: NOTRfPORTED
Name: NOTREPORT£D MAr2, i991
Plan Status: Unknown Actual Completion
Date:
VISTA CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO NAIL GUARD UNIT VISTAID#: 67828 '
Address': HWY 1-7 MI W OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93406 ` -'--
NFRAP /SRCii 18 EPA 1D CAD980BB2773 '
Agency Address: SAMEASA80VE
Alias Name; USARmr '
v
• VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
et,1
Version 2.6.1 Paget,17
UNMAPPED SITES-CONT.
Alias Street: NOTR£PORIED
I NOIREPORIED Alias Latitude: °
Arias City: °
Alias Zip: NorREPORTED Alias Longitude:
Alias State: CA
PREVIOUS EPA 1D/AID981I16977
Alias Description:
EPA Region. 9
Congressional District: °
Federal Facility: Agency code 11
Facility Ownership: UNKNOWN
Site Incident Category: unknown
Federal Facility Docket: Sllf LS NOT INCLUDED ON INE DOCKET
NPL Status: NOT ON NPL
Incident Type: Unknown
Proposed NPL Update �: °
' Final NPL Update f: °
Financial Management System ID: aorREPoerED
Latitude: °
Longitude: °
Lat/Long Source: Agency Code 0
Let/Long Accuracy: Unknown
' Dioxin Tier. Unknown
USGS Hydro Unit: 18060006
RCRA Indicator. Unknown
Unit Id: 0
Unit Name: ENTIRESNf
Type: DSCOVERY Lead Agency: S7AX FUNDf/NANCED
' UNKNOWN Category: Unknown
Qualifier. NOTREPOR)ED
Name: NOTREPORTED Actual Start Date.
Plan Status: unknown Actual Completion UNKNOWN
' Date:
Type: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT lead Agency: SrATE,FUND fNIANC£D
Qualifier. LOWERPRIOR17Y Category: Unknown
Name: NOrREPORITD Actual Start Date: UNKNOWN
Plan Status: Unknown Actual Completion UNKNOWN
Date:
Type:
SCREENING TME NNSPEC71ON lead Agency: EPAfuND-FINANCED
NO FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTION Category: Unknown
Qualifier: NO
g ry
Actual Start Date: NOTREPORTED
Name: NoTREPORTEO MAY 2, 1991
' Unknown Actual Completion
Plan Status: Date:
' • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0403.
Report ID:751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
' Veision 1.6.1 Page 148
O O
UNMAPPED SITES CONT.
VISTA PROJECT DAIRY CHEDA VISTA ID#: 7431755
Address': CAL POLY
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 I
WMUDS/SRC# 68 A enc ID: 13 405000003
Agency Address. SAMEASAeovE
Solid Waste Inventory System ID: NOrREPORTED I
Facility Type' AGRICUITURAI•racdd/es that treat and/or dirpose of the wastes associated wRh
confined and concentrated ankna/feeding,confined anknelhotding,confined
and concentrated aquatt aMina/production raetbties and aquacuRure. The I
treatment and/ordtrpoat o/agdcuRuralretum weter8 krctuded in thu category.
Facility In State Board Waste Discharger NO
System:
Chapter 15 Facility: No I
Solid Waste Assessment Test Facility: No
Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Facility: No
RCRA Facility: NO '
Department of Defense Facility: NO
Open To Public: NO
Number Of Waste Management Units: 1 '
Rank: NOTREPORTED
Enforcements At Facility: No
Violations At Facility: YES I
' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc.at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Page II9
SITE ASSESSMENT PLUS REPORT
I DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES SEARCHED
A) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1 MILE
' NPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property.
SRC#: 19 The agency release date for NPL was January,2000.
I The National Priorities List(NPL) is the EPA's database of uncontrolled or abandoned
hazardous waste sites identified for priority remedial actions under the Superfund
program.A site must meet or surpass a predetermined hazard ranking system score, be
I chosen as a state's top priority site, or meet three specific criteria set Jointly by the US
Dept of Health and Human Services and the US EPA in order to become an NPL site.
SPL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property.
SRC#: 113 The agency release date for Calsites Database:Annual Workplan Sites was October,
1999.
I This database is provided by the Cal. Environmental Protection Agency, Dept.of Toxic
Substances Control. The agency may be contacted at:916-323-3400.
CORRACTS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property.
ISRC#: 14 The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December, 1999.
The EPA maintains this database of RCRA facilities which are undergoing 'corrective
action'.A 'corrective action order' is awed pursuant to RCRA Section 3008 (h)when
I there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a
RCRA facTty. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility's boundary and
can be required regardless of when the release occurred,even If it predates RCRA.
' RCRA-Tsd VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property.
Corracts The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December,1999.
SRC#: 556
' The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal.The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
' storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste.
I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc.at 1 - 800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:April 28, 2000
Version 7.6.7 Page 050
I
f3) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/2 MILE
CERCLIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 17 The agency release date for CERCLIS was October, 1999. I
The CERCLIS List contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List(NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion
on the NPL.The information on each site includes a history of all pre-remedial,remedial, I
removal and community relations activiies or events atthe site, financial funding
information for the events, and unrestricted enforcement activities.
NFRAP VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. I
SRC#: 18 The agency release date for CERCLIS-NFRAP was October,1999.
NFRAP sites may be sites where,following an initial investigation, no contamination was I
found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious
enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration.
SCL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. '
SRC#: 112 The agency release date for Calsites Database:All Sites except Annual Workplan Sites
(incl.ASPIS) was October, 1999.
This database is provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control.The agency I
may be contacted at: .
The CalSites database includes both known and potential sites.Two-thirds of these sites '
have been classified, based on available information, as needing 'No Further Action'
(NFA) by the Department of Toxic Substances Control.The remaining sites are in various
stages of review and remediation to determine if a problem exists at the site. Several
hundred sites have been remediated and are considered certified. Some of these sites
may be in long term operation and maintenance.
RCRA-TSD VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. I
SRC#:12 The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December, 1999.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Program identifies and '
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal.The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
storage,transportation,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA TSDs are
facilities which treat,,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste. I
SWLF VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#:70 The agency release date for City of Los Angeles Landfills was April, 1999. I
This database is provided by the City of Los Angeles, Environmental Affais Department.
The agency may be contacted at: 213-580-1070.
I
I
I
I
iv For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 -800-767 - 0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Version 1.6.1 Page/51
I
SWLF VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 163 The agency release date for Ca Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) was November,
1999.
I This database is provided by the Integrated Waste Management Board.The agency
may be contacted at: 916-255-4021.
I The California Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database consists of both open as
well as closed and inactive solid waste disposal facilities and transfer stations pursuant to
the.Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972, Government Code
Section 2.66790(b). Generally:the California Integrated Waste Management Board
I learns of locations of disposal facilities through permit applications and from local
enforcement agencies.
I WMUDS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#:68 The agency release date for Waste Management Unit Database System (WMUDS) was
February, 1999.
I This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board.The agency may
be contacted at: 916-892-0323.This is used for program tracking and inventory of waste
management units.This system contains Information from: Facility, Waste Management
Unit, SWAT Program and Report Summary Information, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter
I15).TPCA and RCRA Program information,Closure Information;alsosome information
from the WDS (Waste Discharge System).
I The WMUDS system alto accesses information from the following databases from the
Waste Discharger System (WDS): Inspections,Violations,and Enforcements.The sites
contained in these databases are subject to the California Code of Regulations-Title 23.
Waters.
LUST RG3 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#:74 The agency release date for Region#3-Central Coast Region LUST List was June,1999.
This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region #3.The
agency may be contacted at: 805-542.4695.
LUST RG6 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites'within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 108 The agency release date for Lahontan Region LUST List was August, 1999.
I This database is provided by the Lahontan Region Six South Lake Tahoe.The agency
may be contacted at: 530-542-5400.
LUST -VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#: 164 The agency release date for Lust Information System (LUSTIS)was January,2000.
This database is provided by the California Environmental Protection Agency.The
agency may be contacted at: 916-445-6532.
I
I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions.Inc. at 1 -800 -767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report:Apri1.28,2000
Version 1.5.t Page 152
o
CORTESE VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. I
SRC#:53 The agency release date for Cortese List-Hazardous Waste Substance Site List was April,
1996.
This database is provided by the Office of Environmental Protection, Office of Hazardous I
Materials.The agency may be contacted at: 916-445-6532.
The California Governor's Office of Planning and Research annually publishes a listing of I
potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites throughout the State of California under
Government Code Section 65952.5. This database (CORTESE) is based on input from the
following: (1)CALSITES-Department of Toxic Substances Control. Abandoned Sites
Program Information Systems: (2)SARA Tide III Section III Toxic Chemicals Release I
Inventory for 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990; (3)FINDS; (4)HWIS-Department of Toxic
Substances Control, Hazardous Waste Information System.Vista has not included one
time generator facilities from Cortese In our database.; (5)SWRCB-State Water Resources I
Control Board; (6)SWIS-Integrated Waste Management Control Board (solid waste
facilities): (7)AGT25-Air Resources Board, dischargers of greater than 25 tons of criteria
pollutants to the air; (8)A1025-Air Resources Board, dischargers of greater than 10 and
less than 25 tons of criteria pollutants to the air; (9)LTANK-SWRCB Leaking Underground
Storage Tanks: (10)UTANK-SWRCB Underground tanks reported to the SWEEPS systems;
(11)IUR-Inventory Update Rule (Chemical Manufacturers); (12)WB-LF-Waste Board -
Leaking Facility, site has known migration; (13)WDSE-Waste Discharge System - I
Enforcement Action; (14)DTSCD-Department of Toxic Substance Control Docket.
Deed VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
Restrictions The agency release date for Deed Restriction Properties Report was AprH,1994. I
SRC#:46
This database is provided by the Department of Health Services-Land Use and Aa
Assessment.The agency may be contacted at: 916-255-2014.These are voluntary deed I
restriction agreements with owners of property who propose building residences,
schools. hospitals, or day care centers on property that b eon or within 2,000 feet of a
significant disposal of hazardous waste'.
Carifornia has a statutory and administrative procedure under which the California I
Department of Health Services (DHS) may designate real property as either a 'Hazardous
Waste Property'or a 'Border Zone Property'pursuant to California Health Safety Code I
Sections 25220-25241. Hazardous Waste Property Is land at which hazardous waste has
been deposited, creating a significant existing or potential hazard to public health and
safety. A Border Zone Property is one within 2,000 feet of a hazardous waste deposit.
Property within either category is restricted In use, unless a written variance is obtained I
from DHS. A Hazardous Waste Property designation results in a prohibition of new uses,
other than a modification or expansion of an industrial or manufacturing facility on land
previously owned by the facility prior to January 1, 1981. A Border Zone Property I
designation results in prohibition of a variety of uses involving human habitation,
hospitals, schools and day care center.
Toxic Pits VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. I
SRC#:49 The agency release date for Summary of Toxic Pits Cleanup Facilities was February,1995.
This database is provided by the Water Quality Control Board, Division of Loans Grants. I
The agency may be contacted at. 916.227.4396.
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions. Inc. at 1 - 800 -767 -0403. I
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
iv Version 7.6.1 Page!63
I
! Water Wells VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property.
SRC#:3 The agency release date for USGS WATER WELLS was March,1998.
The Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) database was provided by the United States
Geological Survey (USGS).The database contains information for over 1,000.000 wells
and other sources of groundwater which the USGS has studied, used,or otherwise had
reason to document through the course of research.The agency may be contacted at
I703-648-6819.
C) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/4 MILE
IRCRA-Viols/Enf VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December, 1999.
IThe EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Program identifies and
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal.The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation,
I storage, transportation,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Violators are
facilities which have been cited for RCRA Violations at least once since 1980. RCRA
Enforcements are enforcement actions taken against RCRA violators.
I UST's VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
SRC#:45 The agency release date for Underground Storage Tank Registrations Database was
January, 1994.
IThis database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board, Office of
Underground Storage Tanks.The agency may be contacted at:916-227-4364;
' Caution-Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks,especially those
used for residential purposes.
UST's VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
' SRC#:124 The agency release date for San Luis Obispo County Underground Storage Tank List was
January,2000.
This database is provided by the County of San Luis Obispo Division of Environmental
Health.The agency may be contacted at: 605-781-5554:Caution-Many states do not
require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes.
' AST's VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
SRC#:60 The agency release date for Aboveground Storage Tank Database was December, 1999.
' This database is provided by the State Water Resources Control Board.The agency may
be contacted at: 916-227-4364.
TRIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property.
ISRC#:2 The agency release date for TRIS was January, 1998.
Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act(also known
I as SARA Title III) of 1986 requires the EPA to establish an inventory of Toxic Chemicals
emissions from certain facilities(Toxic Release Inventory System). Facilities subject to this
reporting are required to complete a Toxic Chemical Release Form(Form R) for specified
chemicals.
I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions,Inc. at 1 -800 -767 - 0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Version 2.6.1 Page/61
D) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/8 MILE I
ERNS VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property.
SRC#:8 The agency release date for was August, 1999.
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database containing '
records from October 1986 to the release date above and is used to collect information
for reported releases of oil and hazardous substances.The database contains I
information from spill reports made to federal authorities including the EPA,the US Coast
Guard, the National Response Center and the Department of Transportation.The ERNS
hotline number is (202) 260-2342.
RCRA-LgGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. I
SRC#: 16 The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December,1999.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Program identifies and I
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal.The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, I
storage, transportation,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large
Generators are facilities which generate at least 1000 kg./month of non-acutely
hazardous waste (or 1 kg./month of acutely hazardous waste).
RCRA-SmGen VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. I
SRC#: 15 The agency release date for HWDMS/RCRIS was December,1999.
The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Program Identifies and I
tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal.The RCRA
Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facifities which report generation,
storage,transportation,treatment or disposal of hazardous waste.RCRA Small and Very I
Small generators are facilities which generate less than 1000 kg./month of non-acutely
hazardous waste.
SPILL VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. I
SRC#:79 The agency release date for Region#3-Central Coast Region SLIC List was July,1999.
This database is provided by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.Region #3.The
agency may be contacted at: 805-542-3399.
I
I
I
« • _ t.^ r
End`ojKIM
Ms
I
For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 -800 - 767 -0403.
Report ID: 751701901 Date of Report: April 28,2000
Vection 7.6.1 Page/55
I
Lee Price-NARF and DTC Page 1
AULNUR N "
GATE 13-06TEM #
From: <jlopes@co.slo.ca.us>
To: <asettle@slocity.org>, <cmulholland@slocity.org>, <jewan@slocity.org>,
<jmarx@slocity.org>, <kschwartz@slocity.org>, <sstendahl@ci.san-luis-obispo-ca.us>
Date: 3/13/01 12:57PM
Subject: NARF and DTC
Re: Agenda items tonight's meeting
F�'Ar
NCIL 0 CD^.D1R
Dear Ma or and Council members:y O FIR: ^::;[F
WUPANEY O F17 D.RThe NARF and DTC transit and parking projects: MORIG O Fou;:=CHF p REC DIR
I generally support the approach staff is recommending for the NARF and � �
DTC projects. P=MR
or
However, I suggest that the Council designate the NARF site as the ,
long-term transit center in place of the previous decision at the Railroad,
which I think has severe site constraints for a complete multi-modal
facility. It will be a lot easier to transport just train patrons to
destinations than to try to transport all transit users from that area.
Also, a wonderful opportunity opens up to give this downtown center a new
name and acronym, such as the Downtown Transit Center. The fete can be
accomplished by naming the Morro Street DTC project the"Interim Downtown
Transit Center!"
The urban design of the center and parking garage need to be carefully
planned. They are at the heart of a likely new office and retail area.
The Conceptual Physical Plan for the Downtown shows commercial uses lining
the streets in this quadrant of streets around the site,which I agree is
needed to extend the pedestrian downtown.
I support your Council directing staff to assume that the project-will
have street-fronting uses, about 30-feet deep, lining the ground floor
of the parking garage.
Another direction might be to explore the closure of Toro Street between
Marsh and Higuera as suggested in the Conceptual Physical Plan.
The Railroad Transportation Center-Santa Barbara Street:
This item I believe requests funding to complete features of the project.
I implore your Council to fund the removal of the billboard on Santa
Barbara Street.
I suggest that you re-consider the mitigation measure to block
headlights toward two residences that your Council adopted. That
measure needs to be modified to allow lowering the parking lot screening
wall by one or two feet at each end of the wall,which are away from the
residences. Screening landscaping will buffer any headlights in those
locations. The wall in my opinion continues to dominate the street
unnecessarily, particularly at its ends, so that the heart of the
Railroad Historic District is blocked visually. This is solely my
recommendation and not as a member of the ARC.
Thanks, 2230 Exposition Dr.-No. 30 RECEIVED
Jim Lopes San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
ph. 781-5975 w, 541-1681 h MAR 1 3 2001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
13 March 2001
, CC"-
COUNCIL 0 Cr,,n_�
�Z 0 OF
.1� CAO ❑F�".-
To: SLO City Council KrroANEY
CLCSIC/ORIG O FOLI- G::?
e
M7 T AIA ❑REC DIR
From: Tom Swem, Downtown Association ❑urll DIR
0 PERS DIR
Parking and Access Committee Chair --
Re: N.A.R.F.
The SLO Downtown Association Parking and Access committee agrees that a transit
center in the area north of Santa Rosa between Monterey and Higuera streets is an
appropriate and desirable location for this much-needed project. After reviewing the
options given, the committee concurs that option"C"is the most attractive mainly
because it offers the most potential for parking solutions and it puts the buses near the
government center. It could also be developed as a"first class"operation for users
offering amenities. Only option "F" would be an acceptable second alternative. The
Downtown Association Parking and Access committee urges the Council to adopt option
..C>,
A further bonus to developing the transit center is that this will provide the opportunity .
for the Downtown Association, the City, the County, Ride On and Ride Share to
hopefully work together to develop increased access options centered in this facility..
�gEETING AGENDA 2�
were . i`/layor £ C,yy_ .ovnci 1, -OATE 3-13-01 ITEM #a..
s tafF �ecl,mrnehJa�o�c on tl„s i f�vrr �s �,c�e/�� f �
Comments Regarding the North Area Regional Facility (NARF) Study
Dave Romero 2-22-01
Background
EC
There has long been a recognized need to relocate the Transit n
Transfer operations from their current locations in the heart of the9 Z
Government Center to a location at the edge of downtown. Several ;`a
previous studies have indicated the area north of Santa Rosa
between Monterey and Higuera as being ideal.
aoElD13
33B
Parking needs in downtown will continue to increase as the ro raj e 9 0
C2 C,community prospers and attracts more vehicles to the Government 9 9 9= T
Center and the heart of the City. The same area north of Santa Rosa
Street is also ideal to serve future parking needs for this area of the
community.
The NARF study addresses both of these needs.
Considerations
Eight alternatives were considered in the NARF study. In
determining the best alternative the following should be considered:
1. Which alternative will best meet the current and future TRANSIT
needs?
2. Which alternative will best meet the current and future PARKING
needs?
3. Can facilities be constructed at a reasonable cost within a
reasonable time frame?
4. Which facilities Will best serve the convenience of the public for
both transit and parking?
5. Which facilities will cause the least disruption to the fabric of
downtown?
6. Which facilities will cause the least disruption to established
traffic patterns and bus routes?
Conclusion
After studying all of the alternatives, it is my conclusion that
Alternative C best meets all considerations.
1. The block between Monterey and Higuera provides the closest and
most convenient access for both transit users and parkers as they
access the Government Center and downtown.
2. The Transit Center site lends itself to proceeding quickly as a
first phase, since it involves only one property and a level site.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 8 1001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
3.Costs for developing the Transit Center are among the lowest of
all the sites studied,. thus easing financing ,
4. Alternative C allows a design that is the most convenient for
users of buses, allowing transfers within the city system (and
within the county system) without crossing traffic of any kind and
with only a short walk.
5. Alternative C lends itself to development of a parklike setting for
the Transit Center, and will accommodate amenities such as transit
offices, bus shelter and coffee shop.
6.Alte native C will minimize disruption of traffic circulation and
bus routes.
7. Alternative C will fit nicely within the ambiance of Downtown.
8. The parking structure proposed for the remainder of the block will
provide for 700 spaces, the most of any of the alternatives. With
parking needs estimated at 1700 spaces, this site can make a
significant contribution.
Construction of the Parking Structure will require several years as
the City deals with a number of property owners, and a sloping and
contaminated site which is traversed by an inadequate drainage
culvert. Because 'of these complications, the parking structure
should be pursued separately from the Transit Center.
The County office expansion. is a major driving force for a major
parking structure in this area of town. The City must, proceed
immediately with this project so as to assure that additional
parking will be available when these offices are occupied.
I would hope this is one project we can all .get behind and see to a
timely conclusion.
mt INU AGENDA
"TE 3-1Z Q1 rrEM
►►�►��������� ������► c o u n c i l m E m o iza n 6 u m
March 8, 2001
7:R(r,;A0
O s,B. DIR
FIN DfR
TO: City Council ❑FIR. ^."; F O PW D.R❑FOLICHFFROM: Ken Hampian, CAO Q'tp uni DIR
SUBJECT- North Area Regional 6Facility(NARF)Agenda Report o PEAS DIR
Last August, the City Council and Board of Supervisors adopted a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding our joint intent to pursue planning for parking solutions north of Santa
Rosa Street. Although this resolution was adopted after the City had already initiated the NARF
Study, staff has kept the County apprised of the progress of the study.
Attached is the last page of the MOU, which states that the County and City will work together
in further analyzing the feasibility of a parking_ structure in the northern part of the downtown,
with appropriate cost sharing. As such, regard recommendation No. 6 of the agenda report, itis
my intention to work with County staff to consider an appropriate cost sharing arrangement for
the conceptual design investigation study and property appraisal efforts. County staff is expected
to be present at the meeting on March 13`x.
RECEIVED
MAR 0 R 2001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
7. The City is presently engaged in an analysis to determine the location,cost and feasibility to
serve both the City's and the County's regional(SLORTA)bus system passenger transfer
needs. At the Council's request,the City is also exploring the feasibility/desirability of
establishing an allied parking facility. This study is planned for the near firture.
Related Planning Concepts Calling for Further Analysis
1. A concern has been expressed that previously-developed and to-be-developed parking
facilities"south"of Santa Rosa beprimarily reserved for the customers of the downtown
commercial core, and that"north"of Santa Rosa is the more appropriate place for commuters
into the City, County employees,Court system jurors,and downtown employees.
2. If it were deemed to be more appropriate to relocate Court system juror parking to a`.`north of. .
Santa Rosa''parking facility,then it is recognized that an'appropriate-
financial-accommodation would have to be made between the City and the County.
Conclusion
Because of the above considerations,it is increasingly apparent that there is an interdependence
between the County's and the City's plans and expansion efforts in the northeasterly end of the
downtown as it relates to the creation and utilization of panting facilities.
Recommendation:
It is therefore proposed that the Board of Supervisors of San Luis Obispo County and the City
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo recognize the potential mutual benefit of the two general
purpose local government units working together in a cooperative fashion, and authorize the .
County Administrator and the City Administrative Officer and their respective staffs to work
together to analyze the feasibility of a location for a parking structure in the northern part of the
downtown that can accommodate additional parking spaces,with appropriate cost sharing .
between the two parties. Any further plans that are developed as.a result of this process would be
brought back to the.Board of Supervisors and the City Council for further consideration.
CITY OF S Bl3ISPO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
�d�-- c�--- By-
John unn
City istrative Officer
;r"