HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/15/2001, C1 - REVISIONS TO THE MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2001 - MEtoNG AGENDA
�i��lilllll��llllllh ���lll DATE 5-15 ITEM # GG—=l
EEfficouncit memomnbum
lCity of San Luis Obispo
DATE: May 15,2001 '
�/�OUNCIL CDD DIP
■
TO: Mayor&Members of the City Council AO ❑ FIN DIP
RI/ACAO ❑ FIRE CHIEF
ORNEY ❑ PW DIR
VIA: Ken Hampian, CAO CLERK/ORIG ❑ POUCE CHF
�,^ ❑ DEPT HEADS, ❑ REC DIR
FROM: Mary Kopecky, Assistant City Clerk /,r C� •0C,3 vane p UTIL DIR
Z-Wki5enGr ❑ HR DIR
SUBJECT: Revisions to the Minutes of April 24, 2001
Council Member Mulholland requests that Page 4 of the Minutes of April 24, 2001 be revised as
follows:
1. ROADHOUSE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY FILE NO. GP/R/U/ER
108-00 MATT OUAGLINO APPLICANT: 811 EL_CAPITAN (Continued from 3-6-01).
See Paragraph 10--
Council Member Mulholland spoke in opposition to the project because of concerns relating to
parking and quality-of-life issues for the nearby residents. tz. 5he
generally supports the mixed use—concept but in this instance does not support the mixin of
housing with service commercial,
The City Clerk requests that Page 4 of the Minutes of April 24, 2001 be revised as follows:
1. ROADHOUSE MIXED-USE.DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CITY FILE NO. GP/R/U/ER
108-00 MATT QUAGLINO. APPLICANT: 811 EL CAPITAN (Continued from 3.6-01).
See paragraph 13—
ACTION: Moved by Ewan/Marx to 1) Adopt a resolution approving a General Plan
amendment to change the land use designation on a portion of the site from Medium-
Density Residential to Services and Manufacturing. 2) Introduce an ordinance
approving the mitigated negative declaration and rezoning the site from Medium-Density
Residential with a Specific Plan overlay (R-2=SP) and Service Commercial(C-S) to
Service-Commercial Mixed-Use with a Specific Plan overlay (C-S-MU-SP). 3) Adopt a
resolution approving a use permit,thereby establishing a mix of uses for this project and
a parking reduction. 4) Deny the request for a waiver of the use permit feeg M Staff
directed to take tandem parking and signage to-ge-back to the Architectural Review
Commissionfor eer >Iv ; motion carried 4:1 (Mulholland). RECEIVED
MAY 15 2001
SLO Cat K