HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/04/2001, PH 3 - CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO SIZE LIMITATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE RETAIL USES; TA 29-01 council Mw°,D� * Dl
j agenda Repopt
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director
Prepared By: John Shoals, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO SIZE
LIMITATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE RETAIL USES; TA 29-01
CAO RECOMMENDATION
1. Introduce an ordinance to print amending the Zoning Regulations to set maximum
building size and parking requirements for large-scale retail establishments in all
commercial zoning districts, and to include an exception for existing large retail buildings
(Draft Ordinance "A").
DISCUSSION
Situation
On November 20, 2001, the City Council considered final passage of Ordinance No. 1404 (2001
series) amending the Zoning Regulations to establish building size limits for large-scale retail
establishments in all commercial zoning districts, to set a maximum parking requirement and to
exempt existing large retail establishments. At that meeting, the Council further discussed the
maximum size requirements for retail buildings in the CC (Central-Commercial) and CR (Retail-
Commercial) zones as well as reconsideration of the "pipeline" exemption recommended by the
Planning Commission. After lengthy testimony and discussion, the Council voted 4 to 1
(Council member Mulholland voting no) to direct staff to prepare further changes to the draft
ordinance for consideration at the December 4, 2001 meeting:
Council-directed Revisions
Similar to the previous draft ordinance, the Council-directed changes would establish size limits
for large-scale retail establishments in all commercial zoning districts, set a maximum parking
requirement for those establishments and exempt existing large retail establishments. The
revised draft ordinance proposes the following size limits: 45,000 square feet gross floor area for
buildings in the C-T (Tourist-Commercial) and C-N (Neighborhood-Commercial) zones, and
60,000 square feet gross floor area for retail buildings in the C-C (Central-Commercial), C-R
(Retail-Commercial) and C-S (Service-Commercial) zones, with the possibility of going up to
140,000 square feet in the C-C and C-R zones, if the development meets specific performance
standards. Those standards are: the proposed retail use will serve the community as a whole and
PH3-1
TA29-01 (Retail Size Ordinance)
Page 2
the nature of the use requires a larger size building in order to function; the building is designed
to respect the scale of development in the surrounding area;and the new building complies with
the adopted design guidelines for large-scale retail projects. The ordinance would also set a
maximum parking requirement of 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor for retail buildings
over 45,000 square feet and include exceptions for existing retail stores. For clarification, the
ordinance does not include a provision to exceed the 140,000 square foot maximum and would
not exempt"pipeline" projects. A copy of the draft ordinance is included as Attachment 1..
FISCAL IMPACTS
Approval or denial of the ordinance will have no direct effect on the City's funds. However, it
should be noted that adopting the recommended ordinance might have impacts on the City's
ability to attract certain retailers that, in the past, have been of interest to the City, from locating
in the community. Adopting a retail size cap ordinance may discourage large-scale retail
establishments and limit an existing retail establishment's ability to expand in the future to keep
up with economic trends.
ALTERNATIVES
1. The Council could adopt an alterative ordinance with different size restrictions, design
criteria and performance standards. Under this alternative, the Council would continue the
item and provide direction to staff.
2. The Council could reject the draft ordinance finding it to be inconsistent with the General
Plan.
3. The Council could continue action, if additional information is needed.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1-Draft Ordinance "A" Approving a Retail Size Cap
JShoa1s/CC/TA29-01(CCReport4)
PH3-2
Draft Ordinance "A"
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 1404 (2001 Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE
(ZONING REGULATIONS)TO ESTABLISH MAXIMUM BUILDING SIZE
AND MAXIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGE-SCALE
RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTSIN ALL COMMERCIAL ZONING
DISTRICTS AND TO EXEMPT EXISTING LARGE RETAIL
ESTABLISHMENTS FROM THE SIZE LIMITATIONS,TA 29-01
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on April 25,2001,
May 23, 2001,July 11,2001 and October 10,2001,to consider Code amendments and
recommended amendments to Title 17 of the City Municipal Code(Zoning Regulations)to
establish a maximum building size for large-scale retail establishments(commercial buildings);and
WHEREAS,the City Council conducted a public hearings on September 4, 2001,
November 6, 2001,November 20, 2001 and December 4, 2001, and has considered testimony of
interested parties, the records of the Planning Commission hearing and action, and the evaluation
and recommendation of staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to amend relevant
sections of the Central-Commercial(C-C), Retail-Commercial(C-R),Neighborhood-Commercial
(C-N),Tourist-Commercial(C-T)and the Commercial-Service(C-S)zoning designations to limit
the size of large-scale retail establishments,to add performance standards related to the size limits,
and to set maximum parking requirements;and
WHEREAS,the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of San Luis Obispo is to
establish a precise and detailed plan for the use of land in the City,based on the General Plan;and
WHEREAS,the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for the development and use of
property within the Commercial Zoning districts;and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has conducted an environmental review of the
adoption of an ordinance establishing procedures to limit the overall size of retail stores in the City
of San Luis Obispo,and has found that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that
the proposed ordinance will have an effect on the environment and therefore is exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,Public Resources Code Section 21000,et
seq.;and
WHEREAS,the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City of San Luis Obispo,
adopted on August 1994,sets forth goals,policies and programs to: develop and maintain a
pleasant and harmonious environment;promote and enhance real property values;conserve the
PH3-3
City Council Ordinance N..-1404 (2001 series)
Page 2 Attachment 1
city's natural beauty;preserve and enhance its distinctive visual character;and insure the orderly
and harmonious development of the city with attention to site planning and exterior appearance of
public and private structures;and
WHEREAS,the size of large-scale retail buildings present unique challenges for local
government requiring a significantly higher commitment of police,fire and public safety resources
as opposed to smaller neighborhood stores;and
WHEREAS,it is the City's goal to reduce the physical impacts of large-scale retail
structures on the community.
NOW THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that
the proposed amendment to the Zoning Regulations is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines
15061(b)(3), and reflects the independent judgment of the City Council.
SECTION 2. Findings. That this Council,after consideration of all the evidence makes
the following findings:
1. That the City of San Luis Obispo is a city with unique characteristics,ideal climate
conditions,spectacular natural vistas,and dynamic natural features.The proposed limits on
commercial building size are necessary to reduce the visual impacts associated with large
commercial buildings and to sustain and encourage development of commercial buildings
that are more compatible with San Luis Obispo small town atmosphere.
2. That to protect the economic welfare of the community,it is the policy of the Council to
protect,maintain and enhance the social and economic values created by past and present
investments in the community by requiring all future development to respect these
traditions and require that all buildings and structures placed on the land respect the natural
land forms,and become a compatible part of the total community environment,both in the
local neighborhood and the city as a whole.
3. The proposed limits on commercial building size are consistent with the goals,objectives,
policies,and programs of the General Plan,and are necessary and desirable to implement
the provisions of the General Plan.
4. The proposed limits on commercial building size will not adversely affect the public health,
safety,and welfare.
5. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed limits on commercial building size are
insignificant.
PH3-4
City Council Ordinance N.. 1404 (2001 series)
Page 3 Attachment 1
SECTION 3. Sections Amended: The following sections of Chapter 17 of the Municipal
Code are hereby amended as follows:
17.16.060 Parking Space Requirements is hereby amending to read as follows:
Retail sales-general merchandise(drug, One space per 300 square feet gross floor area.
discount,department and variety stores) For retail stores over 45,000 square feet,a
maximum of one space per 250 square feet gross
floor area,with the exception for more spaces if
structured multi-level parking is used.
Retail sales-Warehouse stores One space per 200 square feet gross floor area.
For retail sales-warehouse stores over 45,000 square
feet,a maximum of one space per 250 square feet
gross floor area,with the exception for more spaces
if structured multi-level parking is used.
1738.020(Neighborhood-Commercial)is hereby amended by adding"G"to read as follows:
G.Maximum Building Size:No retail establishment(commercial building)shall exceed 45,000
square feet of total gross floor area,unless excepted by section 17.16.035.
17.40.020(Retail-Commercial)is hereby amended by adding"G" and "H"to read as follows:
G. Maximum Building Size:No retail establishment(commercial building)shall exceed 60,000
square feet of gross floor area,unless excepted by subsection"H"and section 17.16.035.
H.A retail establishment may be allowed up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area,if the
Planning Commission determines that it meets the following standards:
1. The proposed use will serve the community,in whole or in significant part,and the
nature of the use requires a larger size in order to function.
2. The building in which the use is to be located is designed in discrete-elements that
respect the scale of development in the surrounding area.
3. The new building is designed in compliance with the City's Design Guidelines for
Large-Scale Retail Projects.
PH3-5
City Council Ordinance No: 1404 (2001 series) AttaChment 1
Page 4
17.42.020 (Central-Commercial)is hereby amended by adding"G" and"H"to read as follows:
G. Maximum Building Size:No retail establishment(commercial building)shall exceed 60,000
square feet of gross floor area,unless excepted by subsection H and section 17.16.035.
H. A retail establishment may be allowed up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area,if the
Planning Commission determines that it meets the following standards:
1. The proposed use will serve the community,in whole or insignificant part,and the
nature of the use requires a larger size in order to function.
2. The building in which the use is to be located is designed in discrete-elements that
respect the scale of development in the surrounding area..
3. The new building is designed in compliance with the City's Design Guidelines for
Large-Scale Retail Projects.
17.44.020(Tourist-Commercial)is hereby amended by adding"G"to read as follows:
G. Maximum Building Size:No retail establishment(commercial building)shall exceed 45,000
square feet of total gross floor area,unless excepted by section 17.16.035.
17.46.020(Service-Commercial)is hereby amended by adding"G"to read as follows:
G. Maximum Building Size:No retail establishment(commercial building)shall exceed 60,000
square feet of gross floor area,unless excepted by Section 17.16.035.
PH3-6
City Council Ordinance No: 1404 (2001 series) Attachment
Page 5
17.22.010,Table 9-Uses Allowed by Zone is hereby amended to read as follows:
Table 9:Uses Allowed by R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 C/OS O" PF C-N C-C C-R C-T C-S N
Zone
Retail Sales-convenience stores 23 A A A A D D
Retail sales-indoor sales of A8 A A A A
building materials and gardening
supplies(hardware,floor and wall
coverings,paint,glass stores)23
Retail sales-appliances,furniture, A8 A A A A
musical instruments;data
processing equipment,business,
office and medical equipment
stores:catalog.stores;sporting
goods,outdoor supply 23
Retail sales-groceries,liquor and A A A PC
specialized foods(bakery,meats,
dairy items,etc.)
Retail sales-neighborhood grocery A A D
(See also Sec. 17.08.095)"
Retail sales-gen'"merchandise z3
(drug,discount.department.and
variety stores)(See also"Retail
sales-warehouse stores)
-15.000 square feet or less gross
floor area per establishment A A A
-15.001 to 60.000 square feet gross PC PC PC
floor area per establishment
-more than 60.000 square feet PC PC
gross floor area per establishment
Retail sales and rental—specialties As A A
(shoe stores,clothing stores,
book/record/videotape stores,toy
stores,gift shops)23
Retail Sales-Warehouse stores u
45,000 square feet or less gross PC PC PC
floor area per establishment
-more than 45,000 square feet gross
floor area per establishment
PC PC PC
PH3-7
City Council Ordinance No. 1404 (2001 series)
Page 6 Attachment 1
Notes:
23. Large-scale commercial buildings shall not exceed the retail size limits established for each
commercial zone district, see Sections 17.16.035, 17.38.020, 17.40.020,17.42.020, 17.44.020
and 17.46.020.
A large-scale retail commercial building is defined as the construction of a single structure
for the express purpose of accommodating one retail tenant on one parcel. Commercial uses
in different structures separated by a public right-of-way shall not be considered the same
building. When a large-scale commercial use is located within a multi-tenant building, the
retail tenant's space shall define the"building."
SECTION 4.The following section of Chapter 17 of the Municipal Code are hereby added
to read as follows:
17.16.035 Size limits on Large-Scale Retail Establishments
A. Large-scale commercial buildings shall not exceed the retail size limits established for each
commercial zone, see Sections 17.16.035, 17.38.020, 17.40.020,17.42.020, 17.44.020 and
17.46.020.
B. Exceptions to Retail Building Size Limits
1. When an otherwise lawful retail establishment existed on the effective date of the size limits,
such structure shall be considered a development non-conformity but may be continued,
structurally altered,repaired or reconstructed so long as it is not increased,extended or enlarged
beyond the gross floor area of the building that existed on that date. To the extent practicable,
the design guidelines for large-scale retail projects shall be applied to any alteration,
reconstruction or repair that takes place after the effective date of the size limits.
SECTION 5. Summary. A summary of this ordinance,together with the names of Council
members voting for and against,shall be published at least five(5)days prior to its final passage,in
the Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect
at the expiration of thirty(30)days after its final passage.
PH3-8
City Council Ordinance No. 1404 (2001 series)
Page 7 Attachment 1
INTRODUCED on the 4th day of December, 2001, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the
Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the 11th day of December 11, 2001, on the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Allen K. Settle,Mayor
ATTEST:
Lee Price,City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Wi9W nsqffe�
n,CoAttorney
Bhoals/CC/Ordinance 1404(TA29-01 amended)
PH3-9
From: "Montgomery, Victor"<vmontgomery@rrmdesign.com>
To: "'asettle@slocity.org"'<asettle@slocity.org>
Date: 12/4/01 2:32PM
Subject: Big Box Ordinance
Allen/Jan, as you are no doubt aware the "Big Box"ordinance has provisions
that also affect neighborhood shopping centers. I urge you not to vote in
favor of a change of the parking ratio from 1 space/200sf to 1 space/250sf for
these neighborhood serving facilities.These centers provide day to day
shopping for the neighborhood and are based upon providing convenient
parking for relatively short duration shopping trips. If available parking
is inadequate neighbor shopping centers may fail to meet their primary
purpose. Thank you for your consideration.
Victor Montgomery
President/CEO
RRM Design Group
805-543-1794 ext.202
www.rrmdesign.com <www.rrmdesign.com>
www.firestationdesign.com <www.firestatioddesign.com>
CC: "'sstendah@slocity.org"' <sstendah@slocity.org>
_ �.IEETING AGENDA
]�� �+ �, M DATE iz ITEM #�3
JD r"lnasl&dA�S0rS T - — John D. Grad , CFP
525 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 CA L i c.# 0 B 0 8 316
web site: www.jdgfinancial.com
Tel. (805) 544-2242 Fax (805) 544-2261 e-mail: jgrady@jdgfinancial.com
November 30, 2001
Mayor Allen Settle
City of San Luis Obispo 40uNCIL 1�060 DIR
990 Palm Street $�b L7 FIN DIR
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 11 FIRE CHIEF
ORNEY PW DIR
CLERK ORiG n POLICE Qmr
❑ D EADO M Ago DIm
Dear Mayor Settle: ® Cl UTiL 6A
t7 HR 010
Thank you for your work at the last council meeting to bring about the reconsideration of thew
restriction on retail stores that capped them at 120,000 square feet. I believe this restriction
was too stringent and that by passing this ordinance the City of San Luis Obispo would
simply be faced with Costco (or some other retailer) building across the street on county
land. This would have brought even greater problems to the city(water,traffic, design, etc.),
with no controls over the design and development and a loss of tax revenues of perhaps
$500,000 per year.
I, lice you and Councilman Schwartz, would prefer to have no size cap limitation imposed on
new construction. I would rather see the general plan enforced and allow each application to
be reviewed on its own merits with appropriate changes being required as needed. However,
given the makeup of the present city council, the resolution proposed at your last meeting
appears to be the best compromise that can be reached at this time.
I urge you to vote to approve the new resolution when it is presented at your next council
meeting to allow the construction of an establishment of up to 140,000 square feet within our
city. This would hopefully allow Costco to proceed with their current application for a
permit to build a store adjacent to the new Home Depot store on Los Osos Valley Road.
Finally, I ask that you please be open to allowing a greater number of parking spaces than it
appears will be presented in the ordinance you consider at your upcoming council meeting. I
understand that Costco would like to have additional parking beyond the one space per 250
square feet that the council has proposed. Please be flexible enough to work with them on
this issue. They certainly have experience in knowing how much parking their
establishments require. Please don't allow the parking issue to become an obstacle to this
project moving forward once again!
The last thing we want is to have a successful store with insufficient parking, causing wasted
gas and air pollution as cars drive around the parking lot looking for a space to park,possibly
even congesting Los Osos Valley Road! The store and parking will be offset far enough
from the road that I believe it can be constructed without being an eyesore to those passing
by. I feel Councilman Schwarz made an excellent presentation at your last meeting of the
visual lines of sight these two buildings will present to passers by.
RECEIVED
PES 0 3 2001
Securities and advisory services offered through Multi-Financial Securities Corp.,370 17th Sr.,Suite 5000,Denver,Co 80 l��c✓� ®UNC1L
Mrmra NASD/SIPC•Mm m ING Gaoue
Thank you for listening to the citizens of our town and working to bring about the proposed
compromise on this issue by the city council. I believe the city will fare far better and will
reap many more benefits by working with Costco rather than slamming the door in their face
and sending them across the street to develop on county land.
Respectfully yours,
,7�. "�5&4
John D. Grady, CFP
MEETING AGENDA
CA067HWO. C 19` NL ITEM #
WfIIOiLES"E
COUNCIL DD DIR
December 4, 2001 B' AO ❑ FIN DIR
C 3eAO ❑ FIRE CHIEF
U67OFINEY ❑ PW DIR
CLERIVORIO ❑ POLICE CHF
Re: Request for"Pipeline" Status for Costco a T DS ❑ REC DIR
� UTIL DIR
❑ HR DIR
Honorable Mayor and Council:
l
In November 2000, Costco submitted an application for a use permit. In August
2001, the application was deemed complete. Since that time, a new ordinance was
proposed, and is now under consideration which would limit building floor area and
set the maximum parking allowed. We are committed to meeting the square
footage restriction by reducing the size of our proposed building to 138,000 square
feet.
However, our parking requirements are greater than those established in the
ordinance. We recognize that our parking requirements are different than a typical
department or drug store and should not be embedded into a City ordinance. To
resolve this situation, we propose the Council restore the "pipe-line" exemption, as
included in the original draft of the ordinance, and recommended by the Planning
Commission.
We reaffirm our commitment to adhere to the recently adopted design ordinance
and work closely with staff and the ARC to assure high quality architecture and
landscape design.
Sincerely,
Jac S. Frank
President, Real Estate
RECEIVED
PEC 04 2001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
999 Lake Drive • Issaquah, WA 98027 • 425/313-8100 • www.costco.com
-� M'--TING AGENDA
DATE a ITEM#_
MEMORANDUM
City of San Luis Obispo
December 4, 2001
C CIL CDD DIR
❑ FIN DIR
TO: Mayor and Council Members FLE'R11KIORIG
❑ FIRE CHIEF
Ci Administrative Officer NEY n PW DIR
FROM: Ken Hampian, City ❑ POLICE CHF
VIA: John Mandeville, Community DevelopmenfirectlorMm ❑ ggPT HEADS 0 REO DIR
BY: John Shoals, Associate Planner �_ _ gam' HR DIR
IR
2�
SUBJECT: RED FILE—CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE'S RETAIL SIZE ORDINANCE
On December 3, 2001, Council member Marx asked staff to provide a copy of the City of Arroyo
Grande's ordinance limiting maximum building size for commercial uses. As requested, staff is
forwarding a copy of the Arroyo Grande ordinance to the City Council.
If you have questions, you can contact me at 781-7166 or Ron Whisenand at 781-7177.
Cc: Ron Whisenand, Deputy Director-Development Review
RECEIVED
DEC 0 4 2001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
i, r LL.Lam.�cwi .�•✓Jr' nr,r.v i v Vr"!L/L .•. _ "i.. .
ORDINANCE NO. 522 C.S.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH MAXIMUM BUILDING SIZE FOR.
COMMERCIAL USES
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the City of Arroyo Grande Development Code,
which became effective June 13, 1991, and indicated that modifications to the
Development Code may occur to refine the document; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arroyo Grande (°City") has a responsibility to consider
available fiscal and environmental resources of the City and the impact large retail
stores have on these resources; and
WHEREAS, the City's Economic Development Strategy establishes the need for
protection and promotion of the overall commercial service and retail business sectors
of the local economy;-and
WHEREAS, the City has a responsibility to assure adherence to the General Plan in
meeting the needs and desires of the residents and the community; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City adopted on May 22,
1990, establishes the need to ensure the protection of the components of "rural
atmosphere" and "small town lifestyle" which include the scale and intensity of
development; and
WHEREAS, the Land Use" Element of the General Plan of the City further lists
objectives limiting the scale of buildings to low-profile, horizontal forms that are
compatible with Arroyo.Grande's rural, small town atmosphere; and
WHEREAS, the City has conducted environmental review for adoption of an ordinance
establishing limits on commercial building size, and has found that it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed requirements will have an
effect on the environment and therefore this project is exempt from the provisions of
CEQA, pursuant to CERA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information in the
proposed document and staff report, as well as public testimony presented at the
hearing and make the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed limits on commercial building size are consistent with the goals,
objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan, and are necessary and
desirable to implement the provisions of the General Plan.
fL(l.GG.LVV1 .i•..+7r'I HRRVIV jICH11LL V1w.1.JU .:, .
ORDINANCE NO.522 G
PAGE z
B. The proposed limits on commercial building size are necessary because retail
stores or businesses in excess of the proposed limits tend to cause an unfair
economic advantage over smaller retail stores and businesses and will
adversely impact smaller retail stores and businesses and the local economy
overall.
C. The proposed limits on commercial building size are necessary to reduce the
visual impacts associated with large commercial buildings and to sustain and
encourage development of small commercial buildings that are more compatible
with Arroyo Grande's rural, small town atmosphere.
D. The proposed limits on commercial building size will not adversely affect the
public health, safety, and welfare.
E. The proposed limits on commercial building size are consistent with the purpose
and intent of Title 9.
F. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed limits on commercial
building size are insignificant.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-07.040 is amended as follows:
Section 9-07.040 Commercial Site Development Standards
The following property development standards shall apply to all land and
buildings constructed within their respective commercial Districts.
A. General Requirements
1. On lots of record, existing as of the date of adoption of this Title, parcels
having less than the minimum required depths need not provide a front
building setback or landscape area greater than 15% of the depth of the
property (excluding right-of-way area).
2. The creation of new lots within commercial districts following the date of
adoption of this Title shall conform to the minimum dimensions, except in
the case of condominium lots or individual lots within a shopping center,
in which case no minimums are established except at the boundary of the
shopping center or commercial development. Parcels created within
shopping centers are exempt from the site development standards stated
r LL.GL.���i .:r•.�Jrii rri\i\V v vrtry r,•L .,,1i Irv.�.�V r.-. r.
ORDINANCE NO.622 E �.
PAGE 3 V
herein, as they relate to minimum site areas, and minimum lot width and
depth, as long as the following conditions are met:
a. A conceptual development plan for the entire center has been
developed and approved pursuant to the provisions of this Title;
b. Appropriate easements for reciprocal access, parking and
maintenance are recorded, and maintained; and
C. All applicable setbacks adjacent to the exterior boundaries of the
shopping center or commercial development are met.
3. Table 9-07.040-A sets forth minimum Site Development Standards for
Commercial development within Commercial Districts.
Table 9-07.040-A
Commercial Site Development Standards
GC VC 0 HC
1. Lot area, in square feet 10,000 5,000 101000 10,000
2. Lot width 80' 50' 80' 80'
3. Lot depth 100' 80' 100' 100'
4. Front building setback, measured 16' 0' 15' 15'
from property line
5. Interior side building setback 0'8 0' 0'e
0'
6. Street side building setback 15' 0' 15' 15'
7. Rear building setback 010 0' 0'e 00e
S. Maximum lot coverage 45% 100% 45% 45%
9. Maximum floor area ratio 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5
10. Maximum building height 30' or 2 30' or 2 30' or 2 30' or 2
stories stories stories stories
whichever whichever whichever whichever
is less is less is less is less
11. Maximum building size, in square 102,500° 30,000° 102,500° 102,5000
feet
Notes to Table 9-07.040-A:
e Larger setbacks may be required based on special requirements listed in Section
9-07.040 B., surrounding development, or building code regulations.
° No new structure, expansion of an existing structure to an adjacent structure or
modification of an existing structure shall be permitted nor shall any business
rr r•.LG.LU. . '+•VUril rnVtviV vltni wL ..1i w•.....+ •.• +• .
ORDINANCE NO.522 C.
PAGE 4
LrLetailstore
other permit be issued or renewed, that would allow the creation of a
or business with a totalspace occupying more than 102,500 square
GC, HC, and OP districts and 30, 000 square feet in the VC district.
B. Special Requirements
1 . Wherever a lot in any commercial District abuts a lot in any residential
District, a minimum building setback of 20 feet measured from the
property line shall be required. A minimum of 10 feet of this setback area
shall be landscaped; the remaining area may be used for required off-street
parking.
2. In any commercial District, a two-story addition closer than 50 feet to an
existing single family residence shall require Plot Plan Review by the
Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Where off-street parking areas are situated such that they are visible from
any street, an earthen berm, wall, or combination wall/berm three feet in
height shall be erected within the required landscape area and.the parking
area to adequately screen said parking areas.
4. In all Commercial Districts other than the VC District, required front and
street side building setback areas shall be landscaped. Said landscaping
shall consist predominantly of plant materials except for necessary walks
and drives. Where off-street parking is located within such building
setback areas, a minimum landscaped area 10 feet in depth, shall be
provided between the property line and the off-street parking area, with an
additional minimum landscaped area 10 feet in depth required between the
parking area and the building.
5. Except as otherwise permitted, a street side building setback area shall be
used only for landscaping, pedestrian walkways, driveways, or off-street
parking.
6. Except as otherwise permitted, required rear and interior side building
setback areas shall be used only for landscaping, pedestrian walkways,
driveways, off-street parking or loading, recreational activities or facilities,
and similar accessory activities.
SECTION 2: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-09.010 is amended as
follows:
Section 9-09.010 Planned Development- -D).District
A. Purpose.and Intent
1
ORDINANCE NO.Sat G.
PAGE 5
Planned Development (P-D) districts have been established more flexible than
those contained elsewhere in Title 9. The purpose of establishing these districts has
been to grant or require diversification in the location of structures and other site
elements which were believed to be appropriately compatible, while ensuring
adequate standards relating to the public health, safety, welfare, comfort, and
convenience.
S. Applicability
The Planned Development District shall apply to existing planned
developments of record (listed below) and pending applications complete as of the
effective date of this Title. No new Planned Development Districts shall be created
subsequent to the effective date of this Title. All ordinances approving or amending
a planned development, along with relevant zoning information, shall be included in
Appendix 1, and a copy kept in the Community Development Department and City
Clerk's offices.
P-D-1.1 = Oak Park Acres Planned Development
P-D-1.2 = Rancho Grande Planned Development
P-0-1.3 = Royal Oaks Planned Development
P-D-1.4 = Wildwood Ranch Planned Development
P-D-1.5 = Okui Planned Development'
C. Adoption and Amendment of Plans
Adoption and amendment of Planned Development Ordinances shall occur in
the manner set forth in this Title for Amendments to Zoning Districts (Section 9-
03.040). Amendments to a general or specific development plan relating to an
approved Planned Development shall occur in the manner set forth for Conditional
Use Permits (Section 9-03.050). Specific development plans shall be required of the
developer as part of an application to amend or change zoning to the Planned
Development (P-D) district
D. Development Plans and Amendments
1. Specific development plans shall be presented, considered, and
approved as part of the rezoning application process. If a subdivision is
required, the development plans and the tentative subdivision map shall
be submitted simultaneously.
2. The development plans shall include any or all or the following items
where applicable:
r cu.mac.�..�. -....... „ r.n•.v,.. v..,„,�� _� . ..- .__.. . . _.
oRmNANCE NO..Iii c.,_, .
PAGE 6
a. A detailed statement of all uses proposed to be established and
an indication of the areas to be occupied by each use, as well as
the resulting population and building intensities. The statement
shall also include the proposed disposition and use of all areas
indicated by the plan as common areas, open spaces, recreation
or park areas, school sites, and other such private or public
facilities;
b. The total development plan, showing the dimensions and
locations of proposed structures, buildings, streets, parking,
yards, playgrounds, school sites, recreational areas, open spaces,
and other public or private facilities;
C. Detailed engineering site pians, including the proposed finished
grades and drainage facilities;
d. Landscaping plans, in detail, excepting typical single family lot
residential areas of 10,000 square feet and over. The street tree
planting requirements of the city may be waived, provided that
the development plan or covenants provide adequate alternatives
to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission and City Council;
e. Architectural drawings demonstrating the design and character of
the proposed structures, buildings, uses, and facilities, and the
physical relationship of all elements;
f. Detailed engineering plans for the provision of public utilities for
the development, including, but not limited to, water, sewer,
drainage, street lighting, and fire hydrants;
g. Other pertinent information as may be deemed necessary by the
Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and/or
City Council to determine that the contemplated arrangement of
uses make it desirable to apply regulations and requirements
differing from those ordinarily applicable pursuant to the
provisions of this Title;
h. A development schedule indicating the time when the
commencement and completion of the construction will occur
under
the approved development plan; and
ORDINANCE NO.522 L_
PAGE 7
i. A statement requesting modification of regulations and
requirements differing from those ordinarily applicable pursuant
to the provisions of this Title.
4. The development plan shall meet or exceed the minimum requirements
set forth in other portions of this Title for land uses corresponding to
the land uses proposed.
5. Density transfers shall be permitted subject to Planning Commission
and City Council approval.
E. Permitted Uses
The following uses shall be permitted in the Planned Development (P-D)
District pursuant to approval by the City Council of the Planned Development
ordinance for the area in question:
1 . Single family dwellings, duplexes, and multiple family residential
structures, including clusters, condominiums, townhouses, and similar
concepts;
2. Commercial uses and commercial residential uses compatible with the
total development plan, including, but not limited to, mobile home
parks, restaurants, specialty shops, motels, and convention facilities;
3. Accessory buildings and uses as shown on the development plan, to be
constructed with, or subsequent to, the construction of the main
building;
4. Accessory buildings, such as garages, guest houses, or cabanas,
subject to the lot coverage requirements set forth in Section 9-08.010
H; and
5. Public and private park and/or recreation facilities, public end private
schools, and public utility buildings and structures and uses, not
including service, corporation, or storage yards.
F. Maximum Allowable Building Size and Height
1. No new structure, expansion of an existing structure to an adjacent
structure or modification of an existing structure shall be permitted nor
shall any business license or other permit be issued or renewed, that
would allow the creation of a retail store or business with a total space
occupying more than 102,500 square feet.
r LD.LL.rVVl v•V1i- ntir.v � vi'..ni.✓ . ..r ^ . .�-.. _. -.
ORDINANCE NO. C.
PAGE 8
2. The maximum allowable height for a building or structure within the P-D
District shall be as shown on the development plan for the P-D District
or as recommended by the Planning Commission. In no case shall any
structure be of such height or location as to obscure any view due to
elevation differential of building sites.
3. Accessory buildings within the P-D District shall not exceed one story
and fourteen feet (14') in height.
G. Minimum Building Site and Lot Width
1 . Minimum building site and minimum lot' width for any permitted use
other than single family residences shall be as shown on the
development plan, or shall conform to minimum requirements as set
forth in other sections of this Title with relation to land use.
2. Minimum lot sizes may be reduced by two thirds (213), providing the
area of reduction is devoted to common area, open space, green belt,
or other recreational uses.
H. Maximum Building Site Coverage by Buildings and Structures
1. The maximum coverage of a building site by all structures including
accessory buildings permitted in the P-D District, but not including
uncovered patios or swimming pools, shall not exceed thirty (30)
percent for the P-D District, or as shown on the development plan.
2. Where lot sizes have been reduced as provided for in Section 9-09.010
G, the maximum building coverage may be increased directly in ratio to
the reduction of lot size.
1. Minimum Yards Required
The front, side, and rear yard shall be shown on the development plan or as
recommended by the Planning Commission. If front, side, and rear yards are not
represented on the development plan, then yard requirements shall conform to the
minimum requirements as set forth in other sections of this Title.
J. Fences, Walls, And Access
Fences and walls may be shown on the development plan and approved or
required by the Planning Commission in the P-D District. If such fences and walls
are not shown, the following shall apply:
1. Fences, hedges, and walls not to exceed six feet (6') in height may
occupy any side or rear yard, provided:
_ ..
ORDINANCE NO.522
PACE 9
a. That such fences, hedges, and walls do not extend into any
required front yard setback, and in the case of a corner lot, such
fence does not extend into the required side yard setback
adjacent to the street. Such fences, hedges, and walls shall not
exceed three feet (3') in height in aforementioned required
setbacks.
b. That if there is over one foot (1') difference in elevation between
contiguous buildings sites, the six foot (6') maximum height shall
be a combination of the difference in elevation plus the height of
the fence, providing that regardless of any difference in
elevation, a fence not to exceed forty inches (40") may be built
in such areas, and further providing that if written approval of the
adjoining property owner is obtained, and a permit is obtained
from the City Community Development Department, such fence
may be built to a maximum of six feet (61 above the finished
grade. .
2. Fences exceeding six feet (6') in height to enclose a court area, tennis
court, or similar area, may be erected subject to obtaining a Conditional
Use Permit, if such fence is constructed of open mesh wire and is on
the rear one-half (1/2) of a lot.
3. A six foot (6') fence shall be required surrounding a swimming pool.
Upon securing a Conditional Use Permit, any such fence may be
erected exceeding the required height in this paragraph.
4. Access to any parking area, ponding area, or public street shall be
shown on the development plan.
K. Required Minimum Off-atreet Parking
1. All residential uses shall have a minimum of two (2) garage spaces.
3. All other uses shall have off street parking provided as required by the
provisions of Chapter 9-12 of this Title.
L. Utilities
1. Utility lines in the P-D district, including, but not limited to electric,
communications, street lighting, and cable television, shall be required
to be placed underground except that electric utility lines shall be
required to be placed underground only to the extent required for so-
called streamline installation. Where streamline installation is used, the
service lines running from the transmission lines to each residence or
ORDINANCE NO.622 C.__
PAGE 10
other service unit shall be placed underground, and only the
transmission lines may be above ground, on streamline poles which
contain transformers. Transmission lines may be placed underground at
the option of the developer or utility with the concurrence of the
Planning Commission. Where transmission lines are placed
underground, appurtenances and associated equipment such as, but not
limited to, surface mounted transformers, pedestal mounted terminal
boxes and meter cabinets, and concealed ducts may be placed above
ground provided such appurtenances are landscaped to the satisfaction
of the Planning Commission.
2. The developer or builder shall be responsible for complying with the
requirements of this subsection, and he shall make the necessary
arrangements with the utility companies for the installation of such
facilities.
3. Utility lines that do not provide service to the areas being developed,
but which pass through or alongside such areas, may be placed above
ground only after plans for such installation have been submitted to and
approved by the Planning Commission.
M. Variation from Minimum Requirements
Variations from minimum requirements referred to in subsection D.2 of
Section 9-09.010 (Development Plan) of this Title may be permitted in the Planned
Development (P-D) District. The approval of any plan that requires such variations
shall be approved by not less than a majority vote of the total membership of the
Planning Commission upon a finding that such variations will produce any one or
more of the following results:
1. Reduce the area and unsightliness of cut and fill banks; or
2. Reduce the danger of erosion; or
3. Create a better. community environment through the dedication of
public areas, rearrangement of lot sizes, or reforestation of barren
areas; or
4. Create other improvements or permit the use of techniques which will
produce a more desirable and livable community than can be obtained
by strict compliance with such minimum requirements.
N. Grading
r LL.L�.. VVl vVLrii ni.r.v �• v`.n .LL �a _ �.. . �� ...
ORDINANCE NO.522 C�,�
PAGE 11
No construction or grading shall be done until both development plans and
subdivision plans have been adopted as set forth in this Title; provided, however,
minor grading which is necessary for the enjoyment or safety of the existing use
shall be allowed as a matter of right and subject only to City laws pertaining to
grading.
0. Subdivision
In the P-D District, where from the nature of the size, location, shape, or
topography of the parcel of land, or where from the nature of the improvements of
development shown on the development plan, or any combination of these factors, it
appears to the Community Development Director that a future division of ownership
or subdivision of said parcel would be required for orderly development, the
Community Development Director may require the filing of a tentative subdivision
map, as provided in the land division provisions of this Title, and the performing of
any other acts required in such regulation. Where any requirement of the land
division provisions requires any specific act of the land owner or subdivider, the
approval of any development plan shall not become effective until compliance has
been made with such subdivision provisions.
P. Reversionary Clause
Any land classified as a P-D District shall revert to its former classification in
the event that any portion of the development is not commenced within one (1) year
from the effective date of the ordinance classifying said land into a P-D district. If
rezoning is initiated by the Planning Commission or City Council, such reversion shall
not take effect.
SECTION 3: Arroyo Grande Municipal Code Section 9-18.030 -R- is amended as
follows:
Regulatory Floodway: The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent
land areas that must be reserved in .order to discharge the base flood without
cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot.
Restricted Parking; Situation where no on-street parking is permitted along the
street frontage, or where on-street parking is prohibited during specified hours every
day.
Room (Habitable): Room meeting the requirements of this Title for sleeping, living,
cooking or dining purposes, excluding such enclosed places as closets, pantries, bath
or toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries, unfinished attics,
foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility rooms and similar spaces.
ORDINANCE NO.'=C�
PAGE 12
Recyclable Material: Reusable material, including, but not limited to metals, glass,
plastic and paper, which are intended for reuse, remanufacture, or constitution for
the purpose of using the altered form. Recyclable material does not include refuse or
hazardous materials.
Recycling Facility: "Recycling Facility" shall mean a center for the collection and/or
processing of recyclable materials. A Certified Recycling Facility or Certified
Processor means a Recycling Facility certified by the. California Department of
Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Container
Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 1986. A Recycling Facility does not include
storage containers or processing activity located on the premises of a residential,
commercial, or manufacturing use and used solely for the recycling' of material
generated by that residential property, business or manufacturer.
Recyclable Material: Reusable material, including, but not limited to metals, glass,
plastic and paper, which are intended for reuse, remanufacture, or constitution for
the purpose of using the altered form. Recyclable material does not include refuse or
hazardous materials.
Recycling Facility: "Recycling Facility" shaft mean a center for the collection and/or
processing of recyclable materials. A Certified Recycling Facility or Certified
Processor means a Recycling Facility certified by the California Department of
Conservation as meeting the requirements of the California Beverage Container
Recycling and Litter Reduction Act of 1986. A Recycling Facility does net include
storage containers or processing activity located on the premises of a residential,
commercial, or manufacturing use and used solely for the recycling of material
generated by the residential property, business or manufacturer.
Religious Institutions: Any buildings which are used primarily for religious worship
and related religious activities.
Research and Development: A use engaged in study, testing, design, analysis, and
experimental development of products, processes, or services, including incidental
manufacturing of products or provision of services to others.
Residential Care FacTty: Any family home, group care facility, or similar facility for
24-hour non-medical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision, or
assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of
the individual.
Residential Use: Any building which is lawfully used for living or dwelling purposes.
Residential Zoning District: Means property in the RE, RH, RR, RS, SF, VR, MF,
MFA, SR, MHP, and PD districts.
f CD.LL.GVUl + UJri- rr,n,v v �nry ✓� ,a i i . .�„v . .�. ..
ORDINANCE NO.622 C.
PAGE 13
e
Restaurant: A use providing preparation and retail sale of food and beverages,
including cafes, coffee shops, sandwich shops, ice cream parlors, and similar uses,
and including licensed "on-sale" provision of wine and beer for consumption on the
premises when accessory to such food service.
Retail Store: Any building or structure in which one or more articles or merchandise
or services are sold or provided at retail, including department stores.
Right-of-Way: A strip of land acquired by reservation, dedication, forced dedication,
prescription, or condemnation and intended to be occupied or occupied by a road,
crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary
storm sewer, and other similar uses.
Reverse Vending Machine(s): Automated mechanical device which accepts at least
one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to
aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable
credit slip with a value not less than the container's redemption value as determined
by the State. A Reverse Vending Machine may sort and process containers
mechanically provided that the entire process is enclosed within the machine. In
order to accept and temporarily store all three container types in a proportion
commensurate with their relative redemption rates, and to meet the requirements of
certification as a recycling facility, multiple grouping of Reverse Vending Machines
may be necessary. A Bulk Reverse Vending Machine refers to a Reverse Vending
Machine that is larger than 54 square feet; is designed to accept more than one
container at a time; and will pay by weight instead of by container.
Roof Line: Intersection of the plane of an exterior building wall and the primary roof
plan of the building.
Run with the Land: A covenant restriction to the use of land contained in a deed
and binding on the present and all future owners of the property.
SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unlawful,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance
or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed
each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrases be declared unlawful.
SECTION 5: A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper
published and circulated in the City of Arroyo Grande at least five (5) days prior to
the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A
certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted in the
office of the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk. Within fifteen
ORDINANCE N0.522 C. _
PAGE 14
(15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those
City Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published
again, and the Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk shall post a
certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance.
SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date
of its adoption.
On motion of Council Member Ferrara, seconded by Council Member Dickens and
on the following roll calf vote, to-wit:
AYES: Council Members Ferrara, Dickens, Lubin, and Mayor Lady
NOES: Council Member Runels
ABSENT: None
the foregoing Ordinance was adopted this 9' day of January, 2001.
r LL.L._.w +a -..�-.r i n\r,v v �r•.ru � .L _ �. � iv i
i
ORDINANCE NO.522 C..,.
PAGE 15
MICHAEL A. l..ADY, MAYOR
ATTEST:
4111vm,11.
KELLY W O , 1RECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
dTfVFXADAMSF CITY MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
qlTY J, MEL, CITY ATTORNCY
r LD. Lc.Luua -.•u-Imi nr,r.v Iv �r"'u2
l
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION
I, KELLY WETMORE, Director of Administrative Services/Deputy City Clerk of
the City of Arroyo Grande, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, do
hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the attached Ordinance No. 522 C.S.
is a true, full, and correct copy of said Ordinance passed and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arroyo Grande on the P day of
January,2001.
WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of Arroyo Grande affixed this 1 Vi'
day of January, 2001.
KELLY VIS RE, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
- MLANG AGENDA
MEMORANDUM
DATE is-N ITEM #.,3
City of San Luis Obispo
December 4, 2001
�NCIL D DIR
VCL
❑ FIN DIR
TO: Mayor and Council Members ❑ FIRE CHIEF
FROM: Ken Hampian, City Administrative Officer 4e� RNEY ❑ PW DIR
VIA: John Mandeville, Community Development Direct WCRIG ❑ POLICE CHF
1
LIE31 D PT , EADS REC DIR
BY: John Shoals, Associate Planner ((// ❑ UTIL DIR
VA HR DIR
SUBJECT: RED FILE — DRAFT RETAIL SIZE ORDINANCE �ARKING
REQUIREMENTS, TA 29-01
The purpose of this memo is to respond to Andrew Carter's recent email regarding the parking
space requirements outlined in the draft retail size cap ordinance.
After reading the email and reviewing the draft ordinance, staff has determined that Mr. Carter
raises a valid point regarding the wording of the parking requirement for "Retail sales-
Warehouse stores." There are two possible ways to resolve this issue. The first option is to use
the same parking standard for both general retail and warehouse stores. That standard requires a
minimum of i space per 300 square feet for retail stores less than 45,000 square feet and a
maximum of 1 space per 250 square feet for retail stores over 45,000 square feet is size. The
second option is to make all warehouse stores regardless of size have a maximum parking
requirement of 1 space per 250 square feet. Staff believes that either option would adequately
address this issue and eliminate any confusion over the parking requirements contained in the
draft ordinance.
If you have questions, you can contact me at 781-7166 or Ron Whisenand at 781-7177.
Attachments:
Andrew Carter email dated December 1, 2001
Cc: Ron Whisenand, Deputy Director-Development Review
RECEIVED
DEC 1' 2001
SLO CITY COUNCIL
ILohn .S-H`SHOALS 1 ALS--_Big Box.Ordinance. -5rPoirifbnWording -
From: <ANCARTER@aol.com>
To: <aseftle@slocity.org>, <jmarx@slocity.org>, <cmulholland@slocity.org>,
<kschwartz@slocity.org>, <jewan@slocity.org>
Date: 12/1/01 2:08PM
Subject: Big Box Ordinance— Minor Point on Wording
Council Members,
This is a minor point concerning the big box ordinance you are to consider on
Tuesday. It has to do with the Parking Space Requirements outlined on page
PH3-5 of your packet.
In the box under 17.16.060, 1 find the"Retail sales-Warehouse stores"
portion confusing. The way I interpret it.is that warehouse stores under
45,000 sq. fL are to have a MINIMUM of one space per 200 sq. ft while
warehouse stores over 45,000 sq. ft. are to have a MAXIMUM of one space per
250 sq. ft. To interpret the wording any other way would have a minimum
being MORE than a maximum.
Not only is the wording confusing, but it could lead to the following
situation —a 44,000 sq. ft. store having 220 parking spaces (44,000/200
220)and a 46,000 sq. ft. store having 184 parking spaces (46,000/250= 184).
Why not use the"Retail Sales-general merchandise"wording for all stores,
including warehouse stores? Then all stores of any size would have a minimum
parking requirement of one space per 300 sq. ft. and large stores would also
be subject to a maximum of one space per 250 sq. ft.
Good luck on Tuesday. Please pass this ordinance.
Andrew Carter
r I�Ii.V 111 \,1 r1v�1��//'i
ITEM #
UNCIL CDD DIR
From: "Richard Rossi" <richard@rossilegal.com> I�0 n PIN DIR
To: <sstendahl@slocity.org> I AO Z FIRE CHIEF
Date: 12/4/01 2:OOPM lE ORNEY C7 PW DIR
Subject: Stores in our city, or close thereto, inclu big box
RKJCRI(3 POLICE CHF
P HEADS 9 C3 PRO DIR
0 uTIL DIR
Ms. Susan Stendahl: t] HIR DIR
Thank you for assisting in providing to our Honorable Council Members my'ideas, as follow: 1/,�r 41411
I believe that there was a great sigh of relief (collectively by those in our County)when the Council voted
last(?maybe last year)which vote allowed Home Depot(?orws it then Costco-truly, I do not remember)
to establish here. Considerations are numerous, but significantly include: (1) reducing environmental
"damage" (auto emissions, industry emissions to produce the auto, etc), (2) giving shoppers that desire
such stores an additional (apprx) 2 hours a week to be with family(time with family, etc., is so precious),
etc. (i.e., not having to be in an auto-though,they could have family outings Oust kidding...)) in their autos
on the way to Santa Maria--of course,for each mile one drives the probability of an auto accident is
increased-this, too, is, of course very serious, especially because it could be our children), and (3)
possibly a greater selection of goods.
So, it appears that a Costco or other large store here,which would preclude driving elsewhere, is not
intrinsically a bad idea.
Opponents (and others)call them big box stores. That moniker would seem to be to disparage such
stores, or describe their outward appearance. (If shoppers shop such stores, as they do,then it is up to
the store to modify their interiors.) So it appears the issue is the exterior of such a store. In Monterey,
CA, is a shopping center that cannot be seen from the street next to it. Most would agree that few
buildings could ever be built which would match or exceed the beauty of our natural area. Apparently,
under the current guidelines landscaping and berms (sp) are somewhat non-existent. E.g., the
commercial development at Oak Park, Pismo (?A.G.)where OSH is located, does not after many years
have trees, etc.,covering the commercial buildings on the barren/scraped sidehill. In Atascadero we have
the Albertson's back walls against the freeway to see (why not trees). Here in SLO we have the new
Ralph's on Madonna... It just does not seem that one can make a building as beautiful as our area-and I
don't intend to demean architects. We do have some very... buildings (I'm in a hurry here). My idea,
for it is worth: have commercial buildings sunk 5 feet or more, not much, in the ground, and utilize the
removed soil to build berms and require larger trees and shrubs, all so that the entire development is not
visible. Do not allow the trees and shrubs to be pruned back, annually/ever.
Just some thoughts on the issue. Same will allow Costco whatever size and parking it wants-who
cares-as it would not be seen - as in Monterey. Importantly, do not suggest that smaller stores are best,
they are not. There is no rationale for same. Ms. Manx once said that Trader Joes could just reduce its
size. I know she was well intentioned, but-when Trader Joes reduces its size,what does it do... become
another Albertson's, Ralph's, as it has to carry"staples," and cannot carry unique items. Our area is
unique, and you can keep it that way. FYI: I never drive to Costco in Santa Maria. Most of my friends
do. I do shop at Trader Joes. Conclusion: let's move some soil. (If any statement from this letter is
used, please note that it was written in great haste and was not edited for comedy/comment.Thank you
for your eye(s)). Richard Rossi
RECEIVED
PEC 0 L 2001
SLA CITY COUNCIL