Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/2002, 5-7-02 - DESIGN APPROVAL OF ART ON PUBLIC BUSES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT councit j acEnbA REpoRt 5-7-02 CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O FROM: Wendy George, ACAO Prepared By: Betsy DeJamette, Assistant to the CAO SUBJECT: DESIGN APPROVAL OF ART ON PUBLIC BUSES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT CAO RECOMMENDATIONS: As recommended by the Mass Transportation Committee, approve the design for the Art on Public Buses Demonstration Project. _. DISCUSSION Background On October 17, 2000, the City Council approved a privately funded Art on Buses demonstration program proposed by artist Liz Maruska of Maruska Arts. (Attachment 1) As a part of the approval, certain limitations were placed on the program, including the following: 1. The program be limited to a demonstration on a maximum of two SLO Transit buses, for a period of no more than 24 months. 2. The size of the actual advertising space be no larger than the current advertising space being used as part of our existing exterior advertisement agreements. 3. The demonstration program not rely on any public funding nor reduce the amount of revenue generated by the City's current fare media trade agreement. 4. The logo and name of SLO Transit should be placed at a consistent location on all buses. 5. Artwork over windows should be prohibited except where currently allowed in our existing advertising program. 6. Any artwork approved for use as part of the Art on Buses program should depict themes associated with the City of San Luis Obispo. Staff was directed to work with the artist to develop an appropriate design,take the project through the public art process and return to the Council for final approval of the art. Due to Administrative staff changes and the fact that a new transit agreement had to be developed prior to entering into an agreement with the artist, the project remained stagnant until January of this year. 6-1 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses Demonstration Project Page 2 Description of Art. The Art on Buses proposed designs are based on the theme "SLO Dreams". The paintings, which will be converted to 40' vinyl murals and shrink-wrapped to the sides of the buses, represent the green peaks that we see everyday around the City. The peaks include designated open spaces like the Ferrini Open Space on Bishop Peak and the Guidetti Ranch Open Space Preserve. They are dreamy and soft, like a watercolor. Sponsorship advertisements have been designed using hot-air balloons and airplanes with banners to fit the landscape themes. (Attachment 2) Approval Process Agreement. On January 15, 2002, the City entered into an agreement with Maruska Arts, thus allowing the Art on Buses Project to proceed. The agreement addresses the Council's concerns that are listed above and other issues such as application of the murals, maintenance, and removal of paintings from the buses at the end of the 24 month demonstration project. (See Attachment 3 — Agreement Scope of Work) Once the agreement was signed;the artist sought potential financial sponsors for the buses and began the design phase of the project. Art Jury. Per the Public Art process, and direction from the Council, a five member jury consisting of Jean Knox and Debby Anderson of the Mass Transportation Committee, Wayne Peterson representing the community, Deborah Spatafore from the Arts Council, and Sally Weatherford, a local graphics artist, evaluated the proposed bus designs using the Guidelines for Public Art (Attachment 4) and the following evaluation criteria: 1. Evaluation of artistic excellence 2. Appropriateness of scale, form, material, content and design relative to the location 3. Relationship to the social, cultural and historical identity of the community 4. Appropriateness of proposed material as regards structural and surface integrity, protection against theft,vandalism,public safety and weathering 5. Ease of maintenance 6. Appropriateness of proposed method of installation of artwork, safety and structural factors involved installation. The jury determined that the proposed project met all of the above criteria and recommended the project to the Mass Transportation Committee with the following additional conditions: 1. Only the balloons and the airplane with banner should be used for advertising sponsors. 2. There should be one design per bus, rather than the proposed mixing of designs (each side different). 3. The name of the open space represented in each design should be placed on one side of the bus only,preferably in the small area in front of the wheel by the entrance door. 6-2 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses Demonstration Project Page 3 4. The City transit logo must stand out. The artist should work closely with the Transit Manager to attain this objective. 5. The phone numbers of the sponsoring businesses placed on the airplane and banner advertisement should be incorporated into the banner and not appear to dangle below the banner. 6. If the Guidetti open space design is utilized, the artist should make a greater distinction between the lines of blue and green so riders with visual impairments will not get the buses confused with the CCAT buses. Mass Transportation Committee Review. On April 10, 2002, the Mass Transportation Committee reviewed the project, again using the Guidelines for Public Art. After clanfyng several minor concerns, the committee unanimously recommended the proposed designs with the stipulation that Commissioner Allen-Barker review and approve the "SLO Transit" logo for appropriate color contrast and readability by persons with visual impairments. (Attachment 5) FISCAL IMPACT Per the Council directive, the demonstration program does not rely on any public funds nor reduce the amount of revenue generated by the City's current fare media trade agreement. The two buses being used for the program are new additions this year and have never been included in the existing fare media trade agreement. The artist has secured sponsorships to fund the program in its entirety. ALTERNATIVES The Council could choose to reject the proposed designs and request the artist to return with additional designs. Staff does not recommend this alternative because the artwork has undergone intense scrutiny by the art jury and the Mass Transportation Committee, both of which found the work to be professional, attractive and appropriate for the program. ATTACHMENTS 1. Council Agenda Report from October 17, 2000 and Minutes 2. Proposed Artwork 3. Agreement Scope of Work 4. Guidelines for Public Art 5. Minutes from Mass Transportation Committee review–April 10, 2002 GAPublic Art\Current projects\maruska\CAR—Art on Buses 42402 6-3 { ATTACHMENT I council W.&4 Da. acEnda REpont October 17`h 2000 `� C I TY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Mike McCluskey,Director of Public Works Prepared By: Timothy Scott Bochum,Deputy Director of Public Works Austin O'Dell III,Transit Manager SUBJECT: PROPOSED ART ON BUSES PROGRAM CAO RECOMMENDATION As recommended by the. Mass Transportation Committee, approve a privately-funded Art On Buses demonstration program that allows for the use of a maximum of two SLO Transit buses as test cases for a period of no more than 24 months DISCUSSION Background At its April 5t'meeting, the Mass Transportation Committee (MTC)received a-presentation from Liz Maruska, a local artist, who requested that an Art on Buses program be established for the City of San Luis Obispo. The original proposal was to wrap the exterior of the SLO Transit buses in a "shrink wrap" type material to provide a canvas for local artists to display their work. The special vinyl material used is actually imprinted with the artwork and can be heat sealed around vehicles without damage to the vehicle's finish. The artist envisions that this art would enhance the appearance of the buses and increase the public's ability to recognize the SLO Transit system. After much discussion, the MTC sent the issue back to staff and requested that additional information be gathered regarding the cost of such a program, methods of financing it and a way to possibly make it demonstration program only. The MTC also requested that the possibility of revenue generation be considered through artwork sponsorship. Following additional investigation by staff and the artist, the item returned to the MTC at their June 14th meeting. In lieu of a fully comprehensive program that involved the entire SLO Transit fleet, staff made the following recommendations: 1. The program be limited to a demonstration on a maximum of two SLO Transit buses, for a period of no more than 24 months; 2. The size of actual advertising space be no larger*than the current advertising space being used as part of out existing exterior advertisement agreements; 1. The demonstration program not rely on any public funding nor reduce the amount of revenue generated by the City's current fare media trade agreement. 6-4 ATTACHMENT I Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses program Page 2 _.._. i •.,r v.r Figure 1 - Initial Concept Art on Buses Proposal (Note:The MTC determined that this rendering obscured SLO Transit Bus Recognition) The MTC requested that three additional conditions be placed upon the Art on Buses program. 2. The logo and name of SLO Transit should be placed at a consistent location on all buses. 3. Artwork over windows should be prohibited except where currently allowed in our existing advertising program. 4. Any artwork approved for use as part of the Art on Buses program should depict themes associated with the City of San Luis Obispo. Staff concurs with these suggestions and recommends that if the demonstration program is approved by the Council, it should contain both the staff and MTC conditions. O TRAN T I Figure 2—Artist 20 d Rendering(Considered by the MTC on June 14`s) Financial Issues It is difficult to determine at this time if a privately funded sponsorship program can be created in lieu of public funding for the proposed program. The City's Art In Public Places program has no unallocated funds to assist the subsidy of the proposed project. Likewise, staff is reluctant to recommend the use of SLO Transit operation monies for an art program that does not provide any service increase or rider benefit. Another concern is the impact of the proposed program on the City's current bus advertising 6-5 ATTACHMENT 1 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses program Page 3 agreement. Annually, SLO Transit receives $36,000 ($3,000 for each bus) in media trade for exterior advertising by KCOY television. Due to the number of ads we place on television, SLO Transit runs out of this exchange amount each year and must augment the contract with already limited operational dollars. It was originally anticipated that the bus wrap process would cost approximately $10,000 — $13,000 per bus. However, subsequent to the June 14th MTC meeting, the artist has refined and reduced the estimated cost of wrapping the SLO Transit buses. She envisions that only the back half of the buses will be used as an art area. It is estimated that the art wrap process for each bus will be approximately $5,000 - $7,000, depending on the complexity of the art design and its installation. Even with these reduced cost estimates, a program using the current exterior SLO advertising budget to finance the Art program would exhaust the annual amount SLO Transit receives in media trade. Deficiencies in this budget item would then have to be replaced with additional operational monies that would reduce service. a -e - Figure 3—Artist 3rd Concept(Example of art on the last half of the bus only) Therefore, as approved by the MTC, it is recommended that the City Council move forward with a demonstration Art on Buses program, but that it be entirely funded through private donations or a sponsorship program, and that the SLO Transit exterior advertising account remain fully funded by the existing agreement arrangements. 6-6 ATTACHMENT 1 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses program Page 4 O ,v Figure 3-Artist 3`d Concept(Examples of art on the last half of the bus only) Loss of Public Visibility and Identification Any change to the exterior appearance of SLO Transit vehicles is going to have an affect on the visibility and identification of transit vehicles that participate in this program. While this should have little affect on daily riders who know well the bus schedules and routes, staff is concerned that identification of these public vehicles could become difficult for tourists and part time riders. While the Art on Buses program should not have substantial affect on SLO Transit ridership, none- the-less the potential exists for missed trips and some confusion to riders. The MTC concurred with staff's recommendation that the artwork should maintain a consistent identity of theme. In addition,they recommended that the program include provisions that the SLO Transit logo be placed in a consistent location on buses used in the demonstration program. The MTC also felt that art and advertising components of the program should not be placed over windows, except where currently allowed. Staff agrees with these recommendations. Staff also proposes that if the demonstration program is implemented, a media campaign be created to assist patrons and the public to understand the nature of the program. Length of Demonstration Program It is imperative that any demonstration program have a horizon year that allows for review and measure of effectiveness for the program.. Staff believes that a 24-month period is sufficient to allow the program time to demonstrate success or failure in meeting the objectives of art in public places. The Council may wish to consider allowing the program an additional 12-month period to assist the artist in arranging financial sponsorship of the program and to recognize appropriate rates of return for the cost exchange. 6-7 ATTACHMENT 1 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses program Page 5 Content of Art It is important that any art placed in the public view, on a public bus, not be deemed offensive to members of the public. Accordingly, at its June 14th meeting, the MTC recommended that any art allowed as part of the demonstration project be limited to themes associated with the City of San Luis Obispo. Both staff and the artist agree with this recommendation. In July 2000, the Council adopted a process for approving privately funded public art placed on City property. While that process was envisioned applying to City-owned land or buildings, rather than buses, staff believes that it can appropriately be followed for this project. If the Council chooses to move forward with the Art on Buses program, it is anticipated that an art jury, which includes two MTC members, will be formed to judge the merits of the proposed art for the demonstration program. Once approved, the demonstration art will return to the MTC for review prior to returning to the Council for final approval. Conclusion The Art on Buses request/proposal is a ship in uncharted waters for the City of San Luis Obispo. While City staff recognizes the potential merits for such a program, it has been a difficult issue to pursue from both a functional and financial standpoint. In formulating this recommendation for the demonstration program, staff labored to make sure that the artist's request was considered seriously and that all issues associated with such a program were identified. Staffs recommendations are based on three principles: 1) that the current exterior advertising agreements and process not be jeopardized by the program, 2) that any program that is created not reduce the severely limited media fare amounts that SLO Transit is dependant upon each year, and 3) that this program be a privately funded and run program that is only implemented in the public arena These goals are critical in ensuring continued success of the SLO Transit system and appropriate levels of service for our public. Even with these limitations placed upon the demonstration program, the artist is confident that she can proceed with a program that will enhance the character of the SLO Transit fleet and provide a benefit to the community. CONCURRENCES At its June 14th meeting, the MTC reviewed this issue and recommended that the City Council approve, as revised, the two year Art on Buses demonstration program. The City's Public Art Coordinator has also reviewed this proposal and is supportive of the CAO's recommendation. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Council, at its discretion, may enact all, part or none of the proposed demonstration , Art on Buses Program. 2. The Council may direct this issue back to the MTC for further consideration and investigation. If Council opts for this alternative,the MTC would benefit from any additional suggestions or concerns that might be of interest to the Council in order to consider this item further and move the program forward. to' �►�' J ATTACHMENT 1 Council Agenda Report—Art on Buses program Page 6 Attachments Color photographs of art-wrapped buses and a sample of the wrapping material are available for review in the Council Office. L\Council Agenda Repons\An on Buse2i9-2000.doc 6-7� ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Meeting Page 6 Tuesday,October 17,2000 -5:00 p.m- Manager .m.Mana er Whisenand emphasized that the request for a street yard setback exception is still s jecti!n hitecture Review Commission review. N: Moved by Schwartz/Ewan to adopt Resolution No. 9111 approving a lot line ment,with an exception to the standards for lot depth, based on findings and t to conditions; motion carried 4:0:1 (Marx refrained due to a potential conflict rest). Council Member arxreturned to the dais. 3. APPROVAL 6F MODIFICATIONS TO THE WATER USE OFFSET PROGRAM (RETROFIT FOR NEW DEV�LO ME Utilities Director Moss and id Waste Coordinator Mu s presented the staff report. Mayor Settle opened the public earing. There were no public comments. Mayor Settle closed the public hearing. ACTION: Moved by o ero/M to adopt Resolution No. 9112 increasing the retrofit credit towards water imp t fees from the current$150 per toilet to$300 per toilet for flush valve and disabled-s le toilets; motion carried 5:0. 4, APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURE OF 2000 ATE BUDGET GRANT FUNDS. Police Chief Gardiner presented the staff report. Mayor Settle opened the public hearing. There were n ublic comments. Mayor Settle closed the public hearing. ACTION: Moved by Ewan/Romero to 1)Adopt Resolute No. 9113 approving an expenditure of$100,000 from the State Citizens Options Public Safety(COPS) grant to fund the annual salary and benefits for a Commune ations Technician position costing $46,400 and allocate the remaining $53,600 t and the continued funding of a Field Services Technician position. 2)Authorize it Director of Finance to make revenue and appropriation changes for 2000-20 consistent with this approval; motion carried 5:0. BUSINESS ITEMS 5. APPROVE PROPOSED ART ON PUBLIC BUSES PROGRAM. Deputy Public Works Director Bochum presented the staff report. Public Comments Liz Maruska, local artist, spoke in favor of the concept, urged approval and responded to questions from the Council. —end public comments— ACTION: Moved by Ewan/Schwartz to approve a privately funded Art oh Buses demonstration program that allows for the use of a maximum of two SLO Transit buses as test cases for a period of no more than 24 months; motion carried 5:0. 6-8 El ATTACHMENT ' III �• -vr _7A 1` I� l� O t •r�:MS �ZZ Jnr � 1 9 ATTACHMENT 2 LEI] LEI] i Q o°oo °o o° II I �I I I I t 0 00 o o 00I0o II I rim: ATTACHMENT 2 tam I o r 1 i( l I e Jo �o rlu �JV kl El I 1t� r :\I e 1 i 6-10 1 J I I _ --- ATTACHMENT 2 ! � I I ! II ; I r• � It LLJ � � 1 • LJ_ �T Exhibit A ATTACHMENT 3 SCOPE OF WORK lr 1. City to provide Contractor with two (2) Gillig low-floor buses. Contractor may use all or only a portion of the area of bus as depicted in Exhibit B for vinyl artwork. Artwork shall not interfere with the SLO Transit logo or the driver's ability to safely operate the vehicle. 2. Contractor to seek Sponsor(s) to underwrite the cost of project. The demonstration program shall not rely on any public funding nor reduce the amount of revenue generated by the City's current fare media trade agreement. Recognition of sponsor shall be incorporated into the artwork and not stand alone. 3. Contractor shall develop artwork that depicts themes associated with the City of San Luis Obispo. 4. Artwork shall be approved by the Sponsor, Public Art Jury, Mass Transportation Committee, and City Council. 5. Contractor shall coordinate with the Transit Manager, the day and time for application of the approved artwork on the buses. 6. Contractor shall be responsible for installing the artwork and removing it at the end of the contract period. 7. Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the artwork during the term of the . agreement. With consent from the Transit Manager, Contractor may remove the artwork prior to the end of the agreement if artwork is damaged and irreparable due to the extent of damage or the cost of repair. 8. Upon removal of vinyl artwork, Contractor will be responsible for the cost of restoring the exterior surface of the bus covered by the vinyl artwork to the condition of the surrounding exterior surface of the bus. The adhesive used to apply the vinyl artwork shall not cause damage to the vehicles, their paint schemes or exterior surface. The Contractor will be notified of any such damage and SLO Transit will not proceed with repair for 72 hours after notification to the Contractor to enable the Contractor time to inspect the damage if so desired. The Contractor shall be required to reimburse SLO Transit for the full dollar cost to repair any damage to vehicles and/or property resulting from application or removal of the vinyl artwork or any other activities of the Contractor. 9. In the event that the vinyl artwork is damaged as result of any accident either caused by the City's transit services contractor or by any other reason, Contractor shall be required to repair vinyl art to like new condition to City's satisfaction or to replace vinyl artwork at no cost to the transit services contractor or to the City within fourteen (14) days after vehicle has been repaired. Should the damaged vinyl artwork remain in disrepair in excess of fourteen (14) days, the City reserves the right to remove the vinyl art work at the Contractor's expense. 6-11 - ATTACHMENT 4 GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC ART 1. Public artwork shall be original and of high artistic quality. 2. Public art shall be located within the public right-of-way, or shall otherwise be easily visible or accessible from a public right-of-way 3. Interior locations for public art shall be freely open and accessible to the public. 4. Public art shall be compatible with the immediate site and neighborhood in terms of historic, social and cultural characteristics, architectural scale, materials, land use, and geographical and environmental context. 5. Public art proposed for areas of high historical sensitivity, such as Mission Plaza and its creek, should be given the closest scrutiny, including input from the Historical Society,before approval by the jury. 6. Public art shall be integrated with the site, and include landscaping, lighting, interpretive information and other amenities where appropriate. 7. Consideration shall be given to potential conflicts with present or future vegetation or construction. 8. The design and placement of public art shall not impede pedestrian or vehicle traffic, or conflict with public or private easements. 9. Consideration shall be given to any public safety or public health concerns created by the artwork. 10. Permanent public art shall be constructed of durable, high-quality materials and require minimal or no maintenance. Temporary public art shall be constructed of materials appropriate to its duration of public display. 11. Public art shall be securely installed. 12. A wide variety of artistic expression is encouraged. However, expressions of profanity, vulgarity or obvious poor taste are inappropriate. 1 6-12 ATTACHMENT s DRAFT CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO \TO��ORD�ERI�l ASS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES APRIL 10, 2002 CALL Chairman Deby Anderson called the meeting of the Mass Transportation Committee to order at 2:32 p.m. on Wednesday, April 10, 2002, in the Planning Conference Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California. ROLL CALL \ Present: Deby Anderson(Chair), Richard Lee(Vice Chair), Jean Knox, Andrew Rubin, Ann Wager,�Jeennnifer Allen-Barker, and Bob Johnson. Alternates: Jim Weir and Kathy Howard Absent: None Staff: Austin O'Dell, Transit Manager Heidi Vonblum, Transit Intern A quorum was present. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mary Kopecky, City Clerk, swore in Kathy Howard and Bo Johnson as new members of the Mass Transportation Committee. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were received. CONSENT ITEMS Cl. Approval of Minutes of Meeting of March 13, 2002 Motion made by Ann Wager, seconded by Jennifer Allen-Barker, to accept the meeting minutes of March 13, 2002. The motion carried unanimously W47 Johnson abstaining from the vote. 6-13 ATTACHMENT -5 DISCUSSION ITEMS Dl. Review of Recommendation from Art on Bus Panel and Make Recommendation to City Council Mr. O'Dell reported that the Art On Bus Panel met on March 26, 2002. The Panel reviewed five designs that were created by Artist Liz Maruska for consideration to be placed on two of the new low floor Gillig buses. The Panel reviewed the design utilizing the City's adopted Public Art Selection Criteria. The panel determined the designs satisfy the City's criteria and recommended the project to the Mass Transportation Committee to concur with the Panel's determination with the following conditions: 1. Only the balloons and the airplane with banner should be used for advertising sponsors. The jury felt the boy and kites detracted from the designs and did not represent San Luis Obispo as well as the other subj ects. 2. There should be one design per bus, rather than the proposed mixing of designs (each side different). 3. The name of the open space represented in each design should be placed on one side of the bus only, preferably in the small area in front of the wheel by the entrance door. 4. The City transit logo must stand out. The artist should work closely with the Transit Manager to attain this objective. 5. The phone numbers of the sponsoring businesses placed on the airplane and banner advertisement should be incorporated into the banner and not appear to dangle below the banner. 6. If the Guidetti open space design is utilized, the artist should make a greater distinction between the lines of blue and green so riders with visual impairments will not get the buses confused with the CCAT buses. Ann Wager had concern about the art blocking accessibility to certain parts of the bus such as the fuel tank and battery. Austin O'Dell clarified that the art would be cut to allow full access to bus components. Jennifer Allen-Barker commented on the readability of the SLO Transit logo on the picture with the airplane on it. She suggested the SLO Transit logo have a high contrast, have no background, and have a consistent location on all the buses. Andrew Rubin commented on the applicability of the wrapping of the bus for future advertising endeavors. Bob Johnson commented that the decision how sponsoring companies are depicted in the art should be up to the artist and not to the companies. 6-14 ATTACHMENT 5 Richard Lee questioned when the. Art on Bus would be implemented. Mr. Lee commented that it would be good to have the art on the bus in time for Try Transit. Month in September 2002. Motion made by Jean Knox; seconded by Bob Johnson, to approve the recommendation of the Art on Bus Panel with the additional condition that Jennifer Allen-Barker review the SLO Transit logo in the design. The motion carried unanimously. MEMBERS' COMMENTS Richard Lee reported to the Committee that Cal Poly ASI President Angie Hac discussed the need for evening service during a campus meeting. Mr. Lee inquire i the issue of evening bus service will be addressed in the Short Range Transit P. . Deby Anderson confirmed the issue of evening bus service is being reviewed part of the Short Range Transit Plan. Austin O'Dell also confirmed that the eva tion of evening bus service is part of the scope of work for the Short Range Transit ,an. Bob Johnson commented on looking into changing the. the Mass Transportation Committee conducts business. Mr. Johnson suggested following: alternates sit at the table with the Committee, alternates sit in if a me er is absent and vote in place of member, and have the election of the Chair and ce-Chair take place after new members are seated. Austin O'Dell informed the Co ttee that this topic will be discussed at the next regular meeting of the Mass Trans p ation Committee on June 12,2002. Bob Johnson also commented o oking into sidewalk cutouts for buses to pull into at bus stops so that buses do of block traffic causing potential safety problems. Mr. Johnson requested the C ttee and staff look at the possibility of sidewalk cutouts for bus stops. ADJO NT The eting was adjourned at 3:10 p.m. until the next regular meeting of the Mass T portation Committee scheduled for June 12, 2002. Attest: Date: Heidi Vonblum, Transit Intern 6-15 �rain i i J v 5 F 00 , • i 3" �E^N� ell rAV OP 0 00 C^y- i 1� r� r: r • • 0,0 " c n9'�s 1 �Y' U "TTt,',CHMENT ( 1 � �I � r o°°0 0 0 i 0,00 r i C� i I II n I( 4 � i L i i i o°00 o°o 0 o00 _ it I C B Om i I ATTACHMENT 2 I� �I it 0000 O(�C7 I . I 'II � II i I�Ij l it I �I , I j� 'I I li III i-. n,-0o .G ' I :55..�•: :::r:r::r:E?PN == ! l -- -' i 4 ATTACHMENT 2 0000 0Oo 000u i e� x f` , I i (1� of ' R� r J (� C' 00000 \�� - 00 ✓ �.�. ®E LLIU z- ;—:,=rtai e��• w__ueur_•vsi .S{ 'gym •$ECS L10.T..WF1 :IFFF:F'5.81 l .