HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/07/2002, C3 - WATER REUSE PROJECT-AMEND DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT council M..tig D� 5,7,02
j acEnaa nEpout „emNum6
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
FROM: John Moss,Utilities Directo)*f11--
Prepared By: David Pierce,Water Projects Manager
SUBJECT: WATER REUSE PROJECT—AMEND DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT
CAO RECOMMENDATION
1) Approve an addendum in the amount of$136,073 to the agreement with Brown and Caldwell
for design of the Water Reuse Project. 2) Authorize the transfer of$130,000 from the Water
Reuse Project CIP Construction account to the Water Reuse Project CIP Design account.
DISCUSSION
As the Water Reuse Project nears the 90%design milestone, several items have been identified that
are not addressed in the original design agreement. The attached letter from Brown and Caldwell
explains the need for each task. In summary they are:
1. provide the legal description to widen the pipeline easement between South Higuera Street
and Broad Street,
2. provide the legal description for an easement adjacent to the Madonna Road bridge over
Prefinno Creek in order to avoid directional drilling under that large box culvert,
3. design the facilities and process controls to use chloramines for disinfection,
4. design an extension of the potable water pipeline serving the bus maintenance facility to
provide a potable water back up for the recycled water distribution system,
5. design a pipeline extending service from the trunk line on Tank Farm Road to French Park
6. design a pipeline extending service from the trunk line on South Higuera Street to the
connections serving Los Verdes Park Homeowners' Associations.
7. design the recycled water chlorine contact tank to be adjacent and connected to the existing
chlorine contact tanks.
Disinfection of the water being discharged to the creek is accomplished with chlorine. Mixing
ammonia with the chlorine to produce chloramines provides increased reliability for the
disinfection process. There is adequate storage for chlorine at the Water Reclamation Facility but
storage facilities will have to be designed for anhydrous ammonia.
The suggestion to locate the recycled water chlorine contact tanks adjacent to the existing chlorine
contact tanks and provide flexibility of operation that will meet existing and all projected future
needs came out of the Value Engineering process performed by Harris and Associates as part of the
50 % design review. Bringing in another set of eyes and minds to step back and ask "Is there
another way of doing this?" has generated an idea that will save several hundred thousand dollars
by avoiding future expansions to both sets of chlorine contact tanks. After developing the details
for this implementation Brown and Caldwell's staff said that this may set a new stand orfuch
Water Reuse Project—Amend Design Services Contract
Page2
facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT
Design costs for
Agreement $781,957
Addendum No:1 $ 49,977
This Addendum S1169071
Total $968,007
The Water Reuse Project CIP (FY 2001-2003 Financial Plan appendix B page 106) Design account
currently has a balance of$16,000. At this time,the construction estimate is less than the budgeted
amount and thereis no indication that the Water Reuse Project will exceed the cost of the total
budget. Therefore, staff recommends that money be transferred from the construction account to
the design account. This recommendation is made with the knowledge that there is sufficient
funding in the Water Fund Unallocated Reserves Account to cover these costs and that the cost to
the City of the Water Reuse Project will be less than budgeted because of the State Water Resource
Control Board grant that will cover 25%of the costs of the project.
Attachment:
1. Contract Addendum No.2
2. Proposal for Additional Services,Brown and Caldwell,April 19,2002
\\879_MORRO\SYS\GROUPS\UTEL\Council Agenda Reports WRP_B&C_ADD2_CARdoc
C3-2
_ .Water Reuse Project Design Services Attachment 1
ADDENDUM NO. 2
WHEREAS,The City of San Luis Obispo is constructing a Water Reuse Project and said
project is requiring legal descriptions of pipeline easements, design of disinfection facilities using
chloramines, design of a potable water pipeline extension to provide a backup to the recycled water
distribution system;design of pipelines extending service along Poinsettia Street to French Park and
along Los Osos Valley Road from South Higuera Street to Los Verdes Park, and design for locating
the recycled water chlorine contact tank adjacent to the existing chlorine contact tank to provide
flexibility in operation and eliminate the need for a future addition to each set of tanks; and
WHEREAS,the additional work associated with the above mentioned tasks will cost
$136,073.00; and
WHEREAS, amendment No. 1 increased the total compensation sum not to be exceeded by
$49,977.00 to a total $831,934.00
NOW THEREFORE,THE AGREEMENT dated December 3, 1997 between the CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as City, and BROWN AND
CALDWELL,hereinafter referred to as consultant is amended as follows:
1) The total compensation sum not to be exceeded is increased from$831,934.00 to $968,007.00
2) The sum of$136,073 is added in Phase III to pay for those services related to defining pipeline
easements,designing chloramines disinfection facilities, designing a potable water backup
connection, extending service along Poinsettia Street to French Park, extending service from
South Higuera along Los Osos Valley Road to Los Verdes Park,and locating the recycled water
chlorine contact tank adjacent to the existing chlorine:contact tank to provide flexibility in
operation and eliminate the need for a future addition to each set of tanks. These costs are
enumerated in Brown and Caldwell letter dated April 19,2002.
Both City and Contractor do covenant that each individual executing this agreement on behalf of
each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute Agreements for such party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed this
day of May 2002.
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO,
ATTEST: A Municipal Corporation
City Clerk By Allen Settle,Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
G v14G�'h- CONSULTANT
ty me
3-3
� I
Attachment 2.
Dean Y1lttes�7owEr
WO Espia�atie Dr:':
suit?.1610''
CWtard:CA 93D30'
Tel;:{805}6Pa-7890,;
Faxl 05)604'78t1:
April 19,2002
Mr.David Pierce
Water Projects Manager
City of San Luis Obispo
EnnrzsN'znglEfrgnPcrd�B.tiCltq Utilities Department
879 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo,California 93401 18/21632
Subject Proposal for Additional Services
Re; Water Reuse Project
Specification No. 97-68A
Dear Mr.Pierce:
As you are aware,a number of design modifications for the proposed Water Reuse
Project were evaluated in.the Value Engineering (VE) Study Workshop in an effort to
reduce initial construction,and future build-out and operating costs for the wastewater
treatment plant. Eight of the sixteen ideas presented were ultimately selected by you for
implementation into the final design. However,design work beyond the original project
scope is required for some of the modifications so that the City can realize the potential
benefits identified by the VE study. This proposal presents our scope, fee,and schedule
for the additional VE-related work,as well as other design modifications previously
discussed with you.
Task 1. Cross Country Pipeline Easement
A portion of the 20-inch diameter water reuse pipeline travels cross country between
Prado Road and Broad Street within an existing 20-foot wide City water easement
(Station 1+030 to Station 2+100 of the"Cross Country"Alignment). The present width
is too restrictive to efficiently construct the new 20"diameter pipeline and allow for its
long-term maintenance while protecting the existing waterline in place. The existing
water pipeline occupies the centerline of the easement;we recommend that the proposed
20-inch pipeline be located approximately eight feet south of centerline. To
accommodate this,a ten feet wide permanent easement should be acquired contiguous
to the southerly boundary of the existing easement.An additional 10 foot wide
temporary construction easement,south of the proposed permanent easement should
also be acquired for the duration of initial pipeline construction.
C3-4
Mr. David Pierce Attachment 2
August 19,.2002
Page 2
a. Scope:.Prepare legal description,map and area calculation for recommended
permanent and temporary easernent areas. (Note:All appraisals,negotiations
with property owners,and preparation of right-of-way agreement will be the
responsibility of the City and are, therefore,excluded from our Scope of
Work.
b. Fee: $2,880.00
Task 2. Madonna Road Pipe Bridge Easement
The 10-inch diameter water reuse pipeline along Madonna Road crosses a box culvert at
Perfumo Creek near the Laguna Lake tributary(Station 1+230 on the"Madonna Road"
alignment), Due to the high water table in this vicinity and shallow cover over the
culvert,we.recommend a pipe bridge crossing.on the south side of the culvert.
However, the right-of-way boundary along Madonna Road narrows on the east side of
the box culvert. We therefore recommend that the City acquire temporary and
permanent easements at this location for the proposed pipeline alignment.
a. Scope:Prepare legal description,map and area calculation for recommended
permanent and temporary easement areas. . (Note:All appraisals,
negotiations with property owners,and preparation of right-of-way
agreement will be the responsibility of the City and are, therefore,excluded
from our Scope of Work.)
b. Fee: $2,880.00
Task 3. Chloramine Disinfection Facilities
Chloramination,a process often used for disinfection of drinking water and wastewater,
involves mixing chlorine and ammonia to form chloramines.The relative concentrations
of both chlorine and ammonia are essential for optimum disinfection.
First,the chlorine will react with free ammonia to form monochloramine.As more
chlorine is added,additional monochloramine is formed until all the free ammonia is
consumed. When all the free ammonia is gone, the chlorine will begin to react with the
monochloramine to form dichloramine. This reaction will continue until all the
monochloramine is gone. If more chlorine is added, the chlorine will react with the
dichloramine to form trichloramine (also called nitrogen trichloride) until all
dichloramine has been reacted. This is called breakpoint and no more reactions are
possible between the ammonia and chlorine. If more chlorine is added,it will remain as
free chlorine in solution.
Each chloramine has a different effect on disinfection and the key to chloramination is
to produce the correct chloramine species.Monochloramine is an effective disinfectant
C3-5
Mr. David Pierce Attachment 2
August 19,2002
Page 3
and is relatively stable in solution. Dichloramine is also a strong disinfectant but often
gives an off taste and odor in drinking water. Trichloramine is unstable in solution and
decomposes quickly. Although chloramine is a weaker disinfectant than chlorine,it is
more stable and remains in the water distribution system for a longer period of time.
Thus,as water winds through the distribution system,chloramine continues to provide
disinfection.
Chloramine provides more protection against bacterial re-growth in systems since the
chloramine residual is more stable and longer lasting than chlorine. Chloramine,like
chlorine,is effective in controlling biofilm,which is a slime coating in the pipe,caused
by bacteria. Controlling biofilms also tends to reduce coliform concentrations and the
corrosion of pipes.
The most effective means of chloramine treatment is manufacturing onsite. The goal in
chloramination is to maximize the reaction of ammonia and chlorine to form
monochloramine;when monochloramine production is maximized,free ammonia is
minimized,potentially at or very close to zero. For the wastewater treatment plant in
San Luis Obispo,new chemical storage and feed systems would deliver aqueous
ammonia to reuse water in the chlorine contact tank. An analyzer automatically controls
the process by monitoring total chlorine,monochloramine, total ammonia, and free
ammonia in the effluent and controlling ammonia feed rate.
Chloramine disinfection can reduce operations and maintenance cost and improves
reliability of reuse water. These long-term benefits are however offset by the initial
capital investment to design and construct facilities and train personnel for its safe and
effective use:
a. Scope:The additional design services offered by BC will integrate
chloramine disinfection into the City's Water.Reuse Project. This effort
includes process design and preparation of construction documents for the
aqueous ammonia storage area (including a fill station and vapor recovery
system), feed and controls for a fully functional system.
b. Fee: $54,560.00
Task 4. Backup and Flushing Water Source
Regulations require that areas using reclaimed water irrigation be flushed with potable
water to prevent salt build-up. This can be efficiently accomplished—with little or no
inconvenience to end users—by annual deliveries of potable water through the reuse
distribution system. In order to deliver potable water each year,a main line extension
and service connection,with an air-gap to prevent backflow contamination,would be
needed upstream of the reclaimed water pump station.
C3-6
Mr. David Pierce Attachment 2
August 19,2002
Page 4
A potable water source at the reclaimed water tank has an additional benefit,in the event
effluent quality did not satisfy regulatory requirements,an alternate source of water
would be available for delivery.to end users.
Given the potential benefits of a potable water source,we recommend a water service
extension and connection to the Water Reuse Project facilities at the treatment plant..
a. Scope: Investigate potable water utility sources in the vicinity of the
treatment plant;establish supply requirements and evaluate sources. Using
the most cost effective water source,prepare construction documents for a
potable water pipeline extension and service connection (with air gap) for the
Water Reuse Project.
b. Fee: $15,551.00
Task 5. Poinsetta Service:Extension
In order to provide reuse water to French Park,a 335-meter lateral service extension is
required. The pipeline would extend from the RW distribution pipeline on Tank Farm
Road to the north in the Poinsetta Road Right-of-Way. The pipeline crosses two creek
or drainages that may require trenchless installation methods.
a. Scope: Engineering services for design and preparation of construction
documents for a reuse water service extension;approximately 335 meter long
on Poinsetta Road (to French Park). Services include geotechnical
investigation,site evaluation;surveying,utility coordination,pipeline design,
drafting and specifications:
b. Fee: $15,009.00
Task 6. South Higuera Extension
In order to provide reuse water to Los Verdes Homeowners Association;a 224-meter
lateral,service extension is required. The pipeline would extend from the RW
distribution pipeline on South Higuera Street to the west in the Los Osos Valley Road
Right-of-Way.
a. Scope: Engineering services:for design and preparation of construction
documents for a reuse water service extension,approximately 224 meter long
on Los Osos Valley Road (to Los Verdes Homeowners Association).
Services include:geotechnical investigation,site evaluation, surveying,utility
coordination,pipeline design,drafting and specifications.
b. Fee: $16,321.00
C3-7
Mr: David Pierce Attachment 2
.August 19,2002
Page 5
Task 7. Split Use Chlorine Contact Tank
To minimize future build-out of chlorine contact tanks for both creek discharge and
reuse water, to provide additional plant capacity for peak wet weather flows,and to
consolidate facilities.at the plant site,an alternative configuration was suggested for the
chlorine contact tank. Under the new configuration two additional tanks will be
constructed adjacent to and matching the existing the chlorine contact tanks. Tank
usage would be controlled by gate positions located between adjacent compartments.
a. Scope: Reconfigure construction documents to conform to Exhibit C:
(Preliminary) Revised Site Plan,attached.
b. Fee: $28,872.00
Based on the City's final disposition on each item above,any combination of Tasks can
be selected. To account for the time delays resulting from study and development of
these modifications,and additional time required for incorporating design revisions,we
request a contract extension of ninety calendar days.This assumes that we will receive
your approval to proceed with regards to the above items by May 15,2002.
Please call Thomas Fischetti,or me,to discuss any questions regarding this proposal,or
if you should need additional information..
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Pervaiz Anwar
Senior Vice President
RE: nw
cc:.Thomas Fischetti
C3-8