Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/21/2003, CLR-1 - JANUARY 8, 2003 COG MEETING i MEL i iNG AGENDA DATE � 3 ITEM # =.� LIAISON REPORT To: Council con From: Ken Sch Copies: K Hampian, rge, J. Mandeville, M. McCluskey Re: January 8, 2003 COG meeting The SLORTA agenda was essentially non-controversmL Route 9 buses serving the Cuesta Grade project will be reduced in number due to diminishing dollars as the project winds down. A portion of COG's February meeting will be devoted to a public hearing to identify unmet transit needs. New COG officers were elected;Vice chair Peg Pinard becomes Chair,Paso Mayor Frank Mecham will become vice chair and the third member ofthe Executive Committee (as per COG custom)will be our '02 Chair,Morro Bay councilman Dave Eniott: The other COG custom that is evident here is the alternating ofthe Chairmanship between a Supervisor and a City representative. Wendy Scalise now represents Atascadero; otherwise an COG members remain the same as '02. Also new beginning with this January is the televising ofthe COG meetings. I saw part of the replay, so it is working and any of you interested can now tune in. The BIG item as expected was the housing allocation recommendation of staff Most everybody had something to say. I carried our Council's unanimous direction to the Board—some were surprised;most were not. When the final vote came there were stilt two `no'votes:Peg Pinard and Tony Ferraro(AG). Peg's vote was not a surprise. Most of you know that Peg was SLO mayor at the time our'94 General Plan went through all ofthe hoops for adoption. She well remembers an of the blood, sweat and tears that it took to achieve that adoption and she remains proud of how our GP represents an of the compromises that were made to achieve a balance between social, economic and environmental concerns, and consequently remains defiant in the face of a State mandate that fails to recognize these essential GP interrelationships. Tony's vote, on the other hand, came as a surprise. You will remember that during our discussion on how you wanted me to vote,we noted that Arroyo Grande had sent a letter to HCD indicating that they didn't like the process nor their assigned number ofhousing units, but that they would do their best to achieve their assigned goal It turns out that unlike our meeting,the AG Council did not have a `final'meeting on the subject and Tony was left to vote as he saw best. That was the surprise as the AG letter went to HCD over Tony's signature. So the vote went 9-2=1 (Shirley had to leave before the vote.) When the smoke cleared(because most everyone remains smoking mad at the State process),five ofthe Board volunteered to serve on an ad hoc committee to determine Liaison Report,page 2 how we can work with the LCC, CSAC, and others to change legislation before the next go around. The vohmteers were:Sups Bianchi,Pinard and Ryan;and City reps Ferraro and Mecham. Tmie was exhausted before the agenda could be completed. Two items(13-1 and I-2) were continued One deals with transit issues which our Public Works people are interested in and the second deals with a COG staff definition(10+/-pages)of'Smart Growth." (Ed note: if it takes 10 pages to define `smart growth,' we'll never get it.) # ceo Local Enforcement Agency Action Plan (Action Item - Voice Vote) Four Op4@UDs 1 . San Luis Obispo County 2. California Integrated Wasfie - - Manage.ment 3. Ooh, er 'existing LEA (Monterey . 2_ IWMA Would require CIWMB approval `Y .fir • .. y � ` Action plan for startup and; - implementation (. fun_ din:g' nd� :,�. _• 2002'- ' Action PI•an Two steps 1 .Design'ation and Certification , - : : - 'L~ t .f� - `L Desig t"o C= Each Jurisdiction can designafie a Focal enforcement agency — The IWMA needs toabe�� °°''�' _certified .by. _the Californ.i,a�l,rutegra ed`-� �;a Waste Management Board as the local . , �De�ign�atio� Certification Jan a - IWMA - IWMA begins prepares designafiion preparation Oft information plan for enforcement program each Jurisdicfiion plan ,Jurisdiction approves Completedenfo'rcemerot ' the designation program plan. _. - " ` arch 12 - IWMA submits d_ esignafi onainformation ` ham.4 plan and enforcement program plan tothe�CIWMB,. Juiy 1-- IWMA certified - �.K i Operations 1 . Hire a full time REHS 2. Program cost will be about $85,000 _J per year i 3- Program costs-to-be` biIled,,on an actual basis to those=who are ,,being ulated 4-.-Will Kook for grants. to offset;-costs and minimize fees To implement this program, staff recommends the following: 1 . Authorize the President to sign a contract for $15,000 with Carey and Associates and add $10,000 to the existing contract with EcoSolutions and $15,000 to the existing---` _ � contract�with John Cupp§_and Associates = from contingency fund) 2. Direcf8taff.to prepare the designiation information package and submit it-to ; member jurisdictions for action. ,and also= _, prepare an enforcement-program plan_ city clerk memorandum Date: January 22,2003 To: City Coit From: Lee Pri / Subject: January 21, 2003 City Council Meeting The following card was submitted by Mary Beth Schroeder at the City Council Meeting of January 21, 2003. WORK AT HOME! Home Based Business $500-$3,000 a month PT 53,000-$10,000 a month FT • "Control Your Hours&Income! • Full Training&Support Provided • Your Home Is Your Once Csll 1-888-675-7'346 for free Booklet Or Visit:WWW.dreams2income.com Her concern is two-fold: 1) are these folks legal? 2)This will further erode R-1 zones. She is opposed to more home-based businesses in town. We should probably check out#1. cc: Bill Statler,Finance Brigette Elke,Business License Clerk Don Wright, Code Enforcement Officer