HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/21/2003, PH1 - WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN - PHASE II SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK WATERSHED I f
council O ctoher 21. 2003
j acEnba REpoRt
CITY OF SAN .LUIS OBISPO
FROM: Michael D. McCluskey,Public Wor4 Directpx_�
Prepared By: Jay D.Walter,City Enginee . `V
SUBJECT: WATERWAY MANAGEM1 PLAN—PHASE H
SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK WATERSHED
CAO RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Certify Environmental Impact Report(EIR) and approve a Statement of Overriding
Considerations for Category 3 projects for San Luis Obispo Creek Phase II Waterway
Management Plan.
2. Approve a resolution adopting the Waterway Management Program, which includes the
Waterway Management Plan, Drainage Design Manual, and Stream Maintenance
Management Plan.
3. Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the Board of Supervisors encouraging them to
certify the EIR and adopt the Waterway Management Program.
REPORT=IN-BRIEF
A Waterway Management Program has been prepared for San Luis Obispo Creek and its
tributaries to help the City better handle flooding caused by periodic heavy rainfall events. The
program comes as a result of discussions begun in 1996 with the US Army Corps of Engineers
over how to handle continuing flood damage repair and management of the watershed. The
program includes drainage design standards for private and public projects, a maintenance and
management program for private and public properties along the creek, as well as a master plan
for creek capacities to reduce flood hazards in the future through separate capital projects. The
program has undergone a thorough environmental analysis and evaluation; with an extended
period of public review and comment. The result of this effort will revise and update the City's
overall flood policies, provide a roadmap for future Council action to prevent flooding, bring the
City up to the state of the art in hydraulic modeling capabilities and provide the most beneficial
environmentally sound creek repair and maintenance techniques that have been developed and
approved by regulatory agencies and environmental groups.
DISCUSSION
History
A. Floods of 1969 and 1973
These two storms awakened the community to the problem of flooding along the San Luis
Obispo creek system. During the post-war growth years the City had not experienced any
serious flooding problems and had not performed any significant maintenance of the major creek
�rl
f
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE H
Page 2
system. The immediate response to the 1973 flood was the formation of Zone 9 of the County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District. This Zone of Benefit included the entire San
Luis Obispo Creek Watershed. It was formed with a primary responsibility to gather information
about flooding and to develop a plan to reduce or eliminate flood impacts.
Funding was also to be provided for minor maintenance of the waterway. Capital improvements
were not to be funded by the original tax levels. The approval of Proposition 13 froze the tax
formula and resulted in a continuing flow of tax dollars into the program. In the years since its
formation, Zone 9 has funded the Nolte Study of 1977, which recommended standards and
projects to reduce flooding. The recommended projects were a basis for the City's 1983 Flood
Management Policy (Pink Book). Funds in the County program were used each year to pay for
clearing major creeks and the repair of creek banks damaged by high flows in areas under public
control. Generally, funds for projects in the City and in the County were divided, with 80%
going to the City, since it represented about 80% of the funding source. Over time, the balance
in the Zone 9 fund has increased. After the 1995 storms, the City was able to fund a major
portion of a creek bank repair program from the Zone 9 balance and Zone 9 funds were budgeted
to pay for the Questa Phase I and II studies being discussed at this meeting.
B. Pink Book,Flood Management Policy Adopted by Council June 1983
This document included policy.information on design and construction standards for waterways,
storm drains and drop inlets, and listed a number of projects of varying scale to address points of
restriction to flood flows, as well as minor and major creek projects to increase capacity.
Many of the projects proposed were completed, with the main exception being the Major
Waterway Modifications. Council funded some of the major projects, but ultimately declined to
approve final plans and specifications because of costs and environmental concerns.
C. 1995 Floods
The 1995 floods once again reminded the City of the flooding and bank instability problems
along the San Luis Obispo Creek. At that time,the Council had already adopted a goal to review
and update the "Pink Book'. Staff reductions of 1993, and permitting and environmental issues
related to flooding that occurred in 1995,prevented staff from accomplishing this goal.
In the summer of 1995, staffs application to the Army Corps of Engineers for permits to
perform flood damage repairs raised several "cumulative effects" and "downstream impacts"
issues that led to the Corps's requirement to perform comprehensive engineering and
environmental studies of the entire watershed. These studies revisited the Nolte Study and are
now the basis for proposed new City policies on Flood Plain Management and revised design
standards for drainage,bank stabilization, and flood control in the City.
In the fall of 1995, the Corps asserted discretionary authority over bank stabilization measures
within the San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries. The Corps' response to the City's permit
/—Z
'Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE H
Page 3
application was outlined in a letter dated April 30, 1996. It determined that each additional
project that would channelize or otherwise affect the creek would result in greater than minimal
cumulative impacts and require an individual permit (a costly and lengthy process). Instead, the
Corps recommended that the City submit a single individual permit application for a
comprehensive, long-term drainage plan for the creek.
The process was initiated with a Request for Proposals for a two-part study. The study was
broken into two parts because the City and Corps recognized in 1996 that the City needed to
repair certain high priority creek banks damaged in 1995 and that the entire study required by the
Corps would take some time. The first phase was an abbreviated study approved by the Corps
that covered only portions of the creek where permits for bank repair were needed immediately.
The Phase II portion of the study covers the entire San Luis Obispo creek and its major
tributaries, and will satisfy the Corp requirement for a comprehensive long-term drainage plan.
Questa Engineering was selected for both phases of the project following established City
procedures.
D. Approval of Phase II Contract- 1999
Phase II of the study was approved to begin in late fall of 1999. It also had two parts. The first
was an aerial survey of the major creek system from the base of Cuesta Grade to the ocean. The
second was to develop the Waterway Management Program and complete the environmental
analysis. The environmental document was to be a combined Environmental Impact Report /
Environmental Impact Statement in order to satisfy the requirements of both CEQA and NEPA,
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as the NEPA Lead Agency for the EIS. In January 2002,
staff presented to Council a status of the project and asked the Council to provide direction for
various aspects of the program, including Flood Protection Levels for the major portions of the
creek. The presentation detailed the larger projects that would provide most cost-effective flood
protection along with the least damage to the environment, which are now identified in the EIR
as Category 3 projects (see Table 3 later in the staff report). Staff also presented a set of design
policies for special floodplain zones, which would be used to guide future development. Staff
took that direction and moved to complete preparation of the Draft EIR/EIS that was circulated
to the public during June of 2003. The Council is being asked to act on this final EIR.
Waterway Management Program (Program)
The City of San Luis Obispo and the County of San Luis Obispo (as the San Luis Obispo County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 9) serve jointly as the Lead Agency for the
preparation of the EIR and have permitting authority over projects in the waterway and
watershed. The Zone 9 Advisory Committee includes representatives from affected agencies and
parties (federal, state and local)within the watershed.
The program level EIS/R presented addresses the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed San Luis Obispo Creek Waterway Management Program.. The Program consists of
three major components:
I-3
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE II
Page 4
1. The Waterway Management Plan(WMP)
2. The Drainage Design Manual (DDM)
3. The Stream Management and Maintenance Program (SMMP)
In each of these three are a series of environmental policies and guidelines on how best to design
improvements for and maintain the watershed. Thus, the EIS/R performs two functions: a) see if
any environmental measures have been missed, and b) assess the adequacy of the environmental
measures identified.
The Program covers the entire SLO Creek watershed. While focusing on the main stem of SLO
Creek and Stenner Creek, it also incorporates the following major tributaries to SLO Creek:
• East Fork of SLO Creek
• Prefiuno Creek
• Froom Creek
• Brizziolari Creek (tributary to Stenner Creek)
• See Canyon Creek
• Old Garden Creek(tributary to Stenner Creek)
• Davenport Creek
As mentioned earlier, the Corps, in 1996, required a comprehensive plan for the SLO Creek
watershed. As stated in their letter dated May 6, 1996 (Appendix A of the EIS/R), "the purpose
and focus of the comprehensive plan is to ensure that aquatic resource impacts are first avoided,
then minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The plan shall include a) an analysis of
alternatives that meet the overall project purpose of anticipated flood control needs, b)
identification of habitat quantity, width and location of habitat fragmentation, and c) mitigation
measures to offset unavoidable adverse impacts."
The Program will replace the current City Flood Management Policy ("Pink Book") and could
augment or replace the County Land Use ordinances and Standard Improvement Specifications
and Drawings currently in force within the County portion of the watershed.
In addition, the goal of the Program is to allow the City/Zone 9 to obtain a US Army Corps
regional general permit for activities described in the Annual Work Plan on an annual basis.
These activities are actions within jurisdictional waters that encompass standard maintenance
and replacement or improvement of existing flood structures, or repair of banks, channels, and
stream habitat.
The _Program activities proposed were organized into component activities (program action
elements) for environmental review. Program activities have been separated into three
categories based on the level of regulatory and environmental review, and degree of complexity
of the activities..
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY.MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE U
Page 5
• Category 1 activities are CEQA-exempt and typically do not require a Section 404
permit from the Corps.
• Category 2 activities typically fall under Corps jurisdiction and require a Section 404
permit. Consultation with or notification of other applicable regulatory agencies is
Rely required. Category 1 and 2 activities are anticipated to be adequately assessed
and permitted with the level of review provided by this Program.
• Category 3 activities will require additional environmental review through tiering,
due to their size and complexity.
Upon approval of the Program, the City/Zone 9 would submit an application to the Corps for a
permit that would allow construction activities in the creek based on the yearly submittal and
review of an Annual Work Plan (AWP). Each AWP would contain plans for proposed projects
consistent with guidelines in the WMP,DDM and SMMP.
The Program also recommends a preferred method for flood management by including a series
of capital improvement projects that have been selected after thorough review by the City/Zone
9. These projects are large projects and would be subject to further (tiered) environmental
review prior to implementation and would not be part of an Annual Work Plan. These capital
improvement projects, combined with drainage design guidelines and stream maintenance and
management standards, are proposed as a manageable program to reduce and control flooding
along the creek and its tributaries.
Waterway Management.Plan (WMP)
The WMP provides the background and organization of the Program, including project
objectives and a summary of planning procedures. Waterway management needs are identified
in the WMP along with environmental sensitivities, and opportunities for habitat restoration and
enhancement. A Watershed Management Framework (WMP Section 4.0) provides goals and
policies addressing flooding, erosion, water quality, biological resources, land use, societal
values,public involvement and education, and interagency coordination.
A Flood Management Plan (WMP Section 6.0) outlines the preferred set of capital improvement
projects that the City/Zone 9 has selected to reduce recurring flooding problems along SLO
Creek. This capital improvement program is a conceptual description of major projects, each of
which will require additional environmental review as more detailed plans are developed in the
future.
Stream Management and Maintenance Program (SMMP)
The SMMP identifies routine maintenance and repair projects that may be undertaken by either
public or private entities, and provides process, policy, and field procedures that will be adopted
by the City (and the County) to guide activity in the creeks. Mitigation and Resource Protection
Policies are presented in eight categories (SMMP Section 2.0), identifying requirements and
action-standards to support the goals and principles of the Program. Best Management Practices
(BMPs) cover conditions for design and work in the creek (SMMP Appendix A). Policies and
Council Agenda Report WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN-PHASE H
Page 6
BMPs in the SMMP are intended for use on all projects (maintenance or construction) to avoid
and/or minimize adverse impacts caused by the implementation of those activities.
The SMMP also establishes procedures for planning, implementation, reporting, and
documentation of routine maintenance and repair projects through the Annual Work Plan
process. The AWP requirements include identifying stream maintenance priorities for each
upcoming year, and packaging the submittal of those projects in the AWP for review by Corps
and other permitting agencies. The AWP is intended to assure the reviewing agencies that all
AWP projects are designed using WMP Program policies, design standards, Best Management
Practices (BMPs) and mitigation practices. The appropriate regulatory agencies may then rely
on the WMT Program and this EIR (and the EIS, once approved) for their environmental
evaluation of the AWP projects, and in preparing long-term permits for routine maintenance
activities in the SLO Creek watershed.
Drainage Design Manual (DDM)
The DDM provides design guidance for development projects and drainage facility
improvements in the watershed. The DDM guidelines address 1) hydrologic and hydraulic
analysis methods, 2) open channel design, 3) culvert design, and 4) design standards for drainage
pumps and storm water detention/retention facilities. Design and implementation guidelines for
bank repair and stabilization, erosion control, and revegetation are also provided in this volume.
The DDM also includes a US Army Corps based HEC-HMS computer model for use in
evaluating large projects within the watershed. The model is set up to simulate rainfall runoff
events and to show where the water will flow during and after the event. The model allows the
user to modify the ground conditions to compare runoff and routing before development as well
as after simulating the new development conditions. The model is maintained by the City, but
made available for use by private engineers in order to better evaluate the impacts of their
development proposals. The model will be updated with information each time it is used, and
will be an evolving body of information that can be used for continuing watershed analysis and
improvement.
The DDM will be used by the City/County staff for design of public projects for storm water
drainage, flood management and bank stabilization and restoration. Private property owners
seeking grading and building permits within the City limits will be required to follow the
guidelines and procedures presented in the DDM.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires that when a public agency is making the
findings required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 (A) (a), codified as Section 21081
(A) of the Public Resources Code, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring
program for the changes to the proposed project which it has adopted or made a condition of
approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.
i
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE U
Page 7
The EIS/R includes the mitigation and monitoring program as Chapter 10. Much of the
monitoring program includes changes to the WMT, DDM and SMMP and additions to BMPs. In
addition, the monitoring program identifies tiering of environmental review and the necessary
preparation of environmental impact reports for capital improvement projects at the time of their
proposal to the City. The necessary subsequent environmental review of potential impacts is
listed in Chapter X of the EIS/R for each capital improvement project. Also included is the
implementation of the Annual Work Plan (AWP).
The AWP will focus on the Category 2 projects and cumulative effects of all work along the
SLO Creek waterway for the given work season. The Category 2 projects include dredging and
sediment removal, new bank repair projects, upgrade of existing hydraulic structures and bar
removal. Currently, the review and approval procedures for the AWP have not been established;
however, the intent is to include only those projects that meet the requirements of the Program.
The SMMP contains a worksheet that has been developed to cover Category 1 projects as a
vehicle for informing state and federal agencies of work planned for the year. As an action to
implement the above EIS/R mitigation measures, it is recommended that this worksheet be
revised and expanded to include a summary of the necessary information for Category 2 projects,
and this can act as notification to the state and federal agencies of work planned for the year..
In addition, many of the mitigation measures recommended in the EIS/R relate to cumulative
effects of projects along the creek and the temporal issues associated with them. The AWP will
be required to convey information to the state and federal agencies regarding cumulative effects
of the planned work for the year. A worksheet also would be a recommended action item for
demonstrating compliance of the mitigation measures regarding cumulative effects.
The AWP will provide information regarding the success of mitigation measures applied to
projects along the creek that have been constructed in previous years. The AWP will summarize
the annual reporting requirements of projects.
The AWP will also provide an annual review of the overall Program to the state and federal
agencies. The purpose of the annual review is to build in flexibility and adaptive management
into the overall Program, including updating and revising planning procedures and design criteria
and standards periodically as better information and approaches are developed and accepted.
Changes to the design criteria and standards would be conveyed through the AWP.
CEQA Discussion
General Findings
A. The Program has had changes incorporated into the project to mitigate or avoid
significant impacts. These changes include mitigation measures and project
modifications outlined in more detail in the Programmatic EIS/R, dated May 20,
2003, as amended with the Final EIR Response to Comments prepared October 9,
2003 (hereinafter referenced as the Final EIR).
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN=PHASE 11
Page 8
B. The implementation of the proposed Program with mitigation measures as
identified in the Final EIR and as contained in the recommendation to the City
Council has the fewest environmental effects when compared to the other
alteratives analyzed in the Final EIR.
C. The proposed Program as approved includes an appropriate Mitigation
Monitoring Program. This Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that measures
that avoid or lessen the significant project impacts, as required by CEQA and the
State CEQA Guidelines,will be implemented as described.
D. The proposed Program Final EIR dated October 9, 2003 was prepared in
accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. A Draft EIR (as part of
the Programmatic EIS/R) was circulated for public review and comment from
May 20, 2003 to July 14, 2003. All comments received have been responded to
(including a response to the National Marine Fisheries Service letter of comment
directed to the EIS), and the responses and .any resulting changes have been
included in the Final EIR.
Overriding Considerations
CEQA requires lead .agencies to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable
environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project
outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered "acceptable" (State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15093[a]). CEQA also requires, however, that where a lead agency
decision allows the occurrence of significant effects that are identified in the EIR and that are not
at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall support in writing the specific reasons for its
action. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the
administrative record (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093[b]). This required statement is
referred to as a Statement of Overriding Consideration.
Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impact
The EIR identifies one significant unavoidable adverse impact that cannot be fully
mitigated. This relates to the adoption of design flow regulations (for creek flows) that
provide for a less than 100-year level of flood protection. The adoption of these design
flow regulations will result in continued exposure of people and structures to flooding. A
100-year level of flood protection is most frequently the goal of local, state, and federal
flood protection programs, but is not a requirement of any programs, including FEMA's
Floodplain Management guidelines. However, this standard cannot be achieved in San
Luis Obispo in a cost-effective manner or without significant adverse impacts. Proposed
design flows shown in the following Table 3 (from the WMP and DDM) were confirmed
by the City Council in January 2002 to be used for flood management planning.
��a
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE H
Page 9
Table 3 Proposed Channel Design Flow Rates
Waterways Proposed Design Flow
Major Waterways within the City of SLO
SLO Creek above confluence with Stenner Creek
40 year 2
SLO Creek below confluence with Stenner Creek to Madonna Road 20 year
SLO Creek from Madonna Road to Prado Road 50 year
Prado Road to Confluence with Prefumo Creek 100 year
SLO Creek from Prefumo Creek confluence to Urban Reserve Line 100 year
SLO Creek below Urban Reserve Line-maintain eAsting cap acity Approx. 10 ear event for much of reach
Stenner Creek from SLO Creek to Chorro Street 50 year
Stenner Creek from Chorro Street to Urban Reserve Line 100 year
Prefumo Creek within Urban Reserve Line 100 year
Old Garden Creek within Urban Reserve Line 25 year
East Fork of SLO Creek to Broad Street Varies3
Other Major Waterwa s4 50 year
Secondary Waterwayss 25 year
Minor Waterways6 10 year
1. For purposes of designating Design Flows,the required design capacities and design requirements,the system of creeks
and waterways in the SLO watershed is divided into major,secondary,and minor waterways. All existing and proposed
conveyance systems shall be analyzed and designed using the peak flows for the hydrographs developed per the
procedures described in Section 4 of the Drainage Design Manual to meet the design capacities.
2. 100-year protection can be provided with the Cuesta Park Detention Enhancement project.
3. East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek is included.in the Airport Area specific Plan. Standards and plans for flood
management are included in the plan and related environmental documents.
4. Other Major Waterways not named above and within the City Urban Reserve Line,or outside the City that have a
drainage area of over 10 km2 (4 sq..mi.)shall be designed for an average recurrence interval of 25 years with 0.6 m(2
ft)of freeboard,and shall have sufficient capacity for a 50-year design discharge either by alternate surface routes(such
as shallow street flow)or be contained within the channel without freeboard.
5. Secondary Waterways have a drainage area of between 2.6 km2 and 10 km2(land 4 sq.mi.)and shall be designed for
a storm recurrence interval of 25 years,with 0.3 m(1 ft)of freeboard.
6. Minor Waterways have a drainage area of less than 2.6 km2 (1 sq.mi.)and shall be designed for a minimum storm
recurrence interval of 10 years,with 0.3 m 1 ft of freeboard.
Source: Table 5-2, WMP and DDM Section 5.2
Since the design flows cannot provide a 100-year level of flood protection for all parts of
the community, it is considered a significant unavoidable adverse impact. Although the
proposed design flows are an improvement over the existing conditions, it is problematic
to adopt a Design Flow that continues to expose people and structures to flooding.
The flood protection portion of the proposed action specifically relates to Category
3/Capital Improvement projects where the City will strive to meet Design Flows to
reduce flooding and adverse impacts to people and property.
Category 3/Capital Improvement projects were covered in the Programmatic EIS/R for
the purpose of reviewing the whole of the proposed project and for the purpose of
determining which activities would be eligible for inclusion in an Annual Work Plan for
/-9
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE 11
Page 10
routine stream maintenance and management. There are significant unavoidable
adverse impacts associated with the cumulative project that includes the Category
3/Capital Improvement projects that would meet proposed Design Flows but
continue to expose people and structures to flooding. However; the WMP program
activities and projects associated with flood management are determined by the City
Council to be superior to the existing policies and projects contained in the "Pink Book".
The economic and social benefits to the community, by providing some relief from
flooding when and if Category 3/Capital Improvement projects proceed forward,
outweigh the need for the City to meet a typical, but arbitrary, 100-year level of flood
protection. Through discussion of Alternative 3 (Projects not Considered Feasible and
Not Evaluated Further) and elsewhere in the EIR and the administrative record, the City
Council has balanced the costs and potential disruption of meeting the 100-year flood
protection standard against allowing for lesser design flow standards and spending on
other public services and facilities. The City Council finds that the community is
better served by not applying the 100-year flood protection standard to all major
waterways. This Statement of Overriding Considerations applies to the policies
regarding Design Flow regulations and to Category 3/Capital Improvement projects
only.
The Category 1 and 2 projects will not significantly alter flooding frequency, although
they will assist in reducing the effects of flooding by maintenance, management, habitat
enhancement, and aquatic habitat enhancement. Category 1 and 2 projects, in
accordance with WMT standards, will maintain existing channel conditions with respect
to flood flow conveyance capacity, and prevent further deterioration of conveyance
capacity. This would not change the level of flooding nor adversely affect existing
conditions. Therefore, the activities that would be permitted under the Annual
Work Plan are not necessarily contributory to flooding nor would they significantly
assist flood reduction. For this reason,the City Council determines that the impacts
of maintenance and management through Category 1 and 2 projects are not
significant and would not require overriding considerations.
The EIR concludes that the projects for which additional environmental review would be
necessary include all projects identified as Category 3/ capital improvement projects in the Final
EIR. Further action should not be taken on these projects until sufficient design information is
developed and submitted for review to ascertain potential impacts of these actions on the
environment and ensure that sufficient mitigation measures are incorporated into that project
design to reducethe significance of these impacts.
Significant Comments
Letters of comment, and responses to those comments that are within the scope of environmental
impact as defined in the CEQA Guidelines, are included as an attachment. Letters of comment
are reproduced in total, and numerical annotation has been added as appropriate to reference the
response to those comments.
Council Agenda Report-WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PLAN—PHASE H
Page 11
The National Marine Fisheries Service representative submitted a comment letter that raised
several significant issues; most notably commenting that the DEIR seemed inadequate in
addressing the impacts of the program activities.on Steelhead. Staff believes that the program to
be implemented will be sensitive to steelhead using the guidelines and protocol as part of the
AWP activities and during larger projects, which will require formal consultation before
approval. Another comment focused on the lack of precise detail of what activities will take
place within the watershed and where. Staff believes that the combination of the Biological
Resource Inventory work, the collaboration and development of environmentally sound and
reasonable creek repair strategies, the Stream Maintenance and Management plan, and the
Drainage Design Manual will provide an effective overall program to manage the watershed and
protect the environment.
CONCURRENCES
The Program has been a collaborative effort on the part of the City and the County, through the
Zone 9 committee, and various regulatory agencies and environmental groups. Within the City,
the Natural Resources Manager and City Biologist have been extensively involved in the
development of the stream maintenance and management practices. Community Development
has had involvement from the early stages, providing input on the planning and design standards
as well as the EIR focus. Public Works staff has provided input and direction for design
standards and creek maintenance.
FISCAL MACT
There is no direct fiscal impact due to the certification of the EIR and adoption of the Waterway
Management Plan. Future costs of staff time in administering the AWP, ongoing maintenance
activities and possible capital improvement projects all must be separately approved and budgeted
by Council before they can be carried out.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Resolution 5138 (1983 Series)
3. Required CEQA Findings
Council Reading File Materials:
1. Draft EIR/S
2. Final EIR/Response to Comments
3. Waterway Management Plan
4. Drainage Design Manual
5. Stream Maintenance Management Plan
. 6. Appendix B—Biological Resource Inventory
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2003 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS,ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS,AND ADOPTING THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK
WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has within its limits a major creek with a number of
tributary waterways which are both critical drainage channels and sensitive resource areas;and
WHEREAS, this major creek on many documented occasions has flooded the City and
caused damage to public and private properties; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted various policies, design standards, guidelines and criteria to
deal with flooding; and
WHEREAS, the City has worked collaboratively with resource agencies and environmental
groups to develop a comprehensive plan to reduce damage from flooding and protect the waterway;
and
WHEREAS, a necessary step in addressing resource protection and drainage requirements of
the community is the adoption of a comprehensive Waterway Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo Creek Waterway Management Plan will serve as a guide for
the present and future City Councils; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the San Luis
Obispo Creek Waterway Management Plan of October 2003; and
WHEREAS,the City has certified the final Environmental Impact Report(EIR)of the San Luis
Obispo Creek Waterway Management Plan;thereby incorporating mitigations specified in the EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo
as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination
1. The City Council finds that changes have been incorporated into the project to mitigate
or avoid significant impacts. These changes include mitigation measures and project
modifications outlined herein and set for in more detail in the Programmatic EIS/R,dated
May 20,2003,as amended with the Final EIR Response to Comments prepared October
9,2003 (hereinafter referenced as the Final EIR).
2. The City Council finds that the implementation of the proposed project with mitigation
measures as identified in the Final EIR and as contained in the recommendation to the
City Council would have the fewest environmental effects when compared to the other
alternatives analyzed in the Final EIR.
R
Resolution No. (2003 Series)
Page 2
3. The City Council finds that the project as approved includes an appropriate Mitigation
Monitoring Program. This Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that measures that avoid or
lessen the significant project impacts, as required by CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines,will
be implemented as described.
4. The City Council finds that the October 9,2003 Final EIR was prepared in accordance with
CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. A Draft EIR(as part of the Programmatic EIS/R)was
circulated for public review and comment from May 20,2003 to July 14, 2003. All comments
received have been responded to(including a response to the National Marine Fisheries Service
letter of comment directed to the EIS),and the responses and any resulting changes have been
included in the Final EIR.
5. The City Council finds that the Category 3/Capital Improvement projects were covered in the
Programmatic EIS/R for the purpose of reviewing the whole of the proposed project and for the
purpose of determining which activities would be eligible for inclusion in an Annual Work Plan
for routine stream maintenance and management. There are significant unavoidable adverse
impacts associated with the cumulative project that includes the Category 3/Capital Improvement
projects that would meet proposed Design Flows but continue to expose people and structures to
flooding. However,the WMP program activities and projects associated with flood management
are determined by the City Council to be superior to the existing policies and projects contained
in the"Pink.Book".The economic and social benefits to the community,by providing some
relief from flooding when and if Category 3/Capital Improvement projects proceed forward,
outweigh the need for the City to meet typical,but arbitrary, 100-year level of flood protection.
Through discussion of Alternative 3 (Projects not Considered Feasible and Not Evaluated
Further)and elsewhere in the EIR and the administrative record,the City Council has balanced
the costs and potential disruption of meeting the 100-year flood protection standard against
allowing for lesser design flow standards and spending on other public services and facilities.
The City Council finds that the community is better served by not applying the 100-year flood
protection standard to all major waterways. This Statement of Overriding Considerations applies
to the policies regarding Design Flow regulations and to Category 3/Capital Improvement
projects only.
6. The City Council finds that the Category 1 and 2 projects will not significantly alter flooding
frequency, although they will assist in reducing the effects of flooding by maintenance,
management,habitat enhancement, and aquatic habitat enhancement. Category 1 and 2 projects,
in accordance with WMP standards, will maintain existing channel conditions with respect to
flood flow conveyance capacity, and prevent further deterioration of conveyance capacity. This
would not change the level of flooding nor adversely affect existing conditions. Therefore, the
activities that would be permitted under the Annual Work Plan are not necessarily contributory
to flooding nor would they significantly assist flood reduction. For this reason,the City Council
determines that the impacts of maintenance and management through Category 1 and 2 projects
are not significant and would not require overriding considerations.
7. In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds that the
preferred project may have significant effects on the environment but that these effects will be
lessened to insignificance by incorporation of the mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR
portion of the Programmatic EIS/R. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section 15092(a
,b) the City Council certifies that the Final EIR portion of the Programmatic EIS/R, dated
Resolution No. (2003 Series)
Page 3
October 9, 2003 (including the Public Hearing Draft dated May 20, 2003) has been prepared in
accordance with CEQA,and approves the project as recommended by Staff.
8. The City Council farther finds that the projects for which additional environmental review would
be necessary include all projects identified as Category 3 projects in the Final EIR. Further
action should not be taken on these projects until sufficient design information is developed and
submitted for review to ascertain potential impacts of these actions on the environment and
ensure that sufficient mitigation measures are incorporated into that project design to reduce the
significance of these impacts, including the possible need to review the potential for statement of
overriding considerations.
SECTION 2. Waterwav Management Program
The City Council makes the following findings concerning the three components of the Waterway
Management Program:
1. Waterway Management Plan.
The City Council finds that the adoption of the Waterway Management Plan provides for a
comprehensive guide to planning and management of San Luis Obispo Creek. The
management framework provides ,goals and policies addressing flooding, erosion, water
quality, biological resources, land use, societal values, public involvement and education and
interagency coordination. The Plan also outlines the preferred set of Capital Improvement
projects that the City has selected to reduce recurring flooding problems along the creek,
acknowledging that all of them will require much more thorough environmental review.
2. Drainage Design Manual.
The City Council finds that the adoption of the Drainage Design Manual provides the tools
for thorough design and analysis of hydraulic and hydrologic issues in the watershed. The
Design Manual guidelines address hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, open channel design,
culvert design, storm water detention/retention facilities, bank repair and stabilization
(emphasizing biotechnical techniques), erosion control and revegetation strategies. The
Council also finds that the use of the drainage design tools by both the City staff and the
private development community will benefit the watershed by the application of consistent
principles and practice in order to reduce the effects of flooding.
3. Stream Management and Maintenance Program.
The City Council finds that the adoption of the Stream Management and Maintenance
Program provides the necessary education, policy, and field procedures to ensure that
maintenance activities in the creek are carried out in the most environmentally sensitive,
productive and efficient manner possible. The Council also finds that the procedures for
planning, implementation, reporting and documentation of maintenance projects through an
Annual Work Plan will ensure to the resource agencies and environmental groups that all
maintenance activities are carried out using the WMP program policies, design standards,
BMPs and mitigation practices.
��y
Resolution No. (M3 Series)
Page 4
SECTION 3. Waterway Management Program Documents
The following documents are hereby approved and adopted, and furthermore constitute the City's
policy for the administration and implementation of the Waterway Management Program:
1. Waterway Management Plan, October 2003
2. Drainage Design Manual,October 2003
3. Stream Maintenance Management Plan, October 2003
The City Council finds that the Waterway Management Program includes all applicable policies,
guidelines and program elements necessary to,govern the City's role in the management of San Luis
Obispo Creek waterway.
SECTION 4. Repeal of Resolution Number 5138 (1983 Series)
Resolution No. 5138, adopted on June 21, 1983 is hereby rescinded.
Upon motion of , seconded by
and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this day of ,2003.
David F. Romero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lee Price, C.M.C.
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jo at . Lowell
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5138 (1983 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN LUIS OBISPO MAKING CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS AND ADOPTING A FLOOD MANAGEMENT
POLICY, STANDARDS AND ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has within its limits a number
of natural waterways, feeder streams and catch basins which are critical
drainage channels and sensitive resource areas; and.
WHEREAS, this drainage system includes divergent storm-flow capaci-
ties which cause flooding under certain storm circumstances (documented
in 1969 and 1973); and
WHEREAS, approximately 95 percent of these waterways are in private
ownership; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted various policies, design standards,
guidelines and criteria to deal with flooding; and
WHEREAS, a necessary step in addressing resource protection and
drainage requirements of the community is the adoption of a comprehen-
sive Flood Management Policy Statement and Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Flood Management Policy Statement and Action Plan will
serve as a guide for the present and future City Councils; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Environmental Study on
the Flood Management Report and proposed Policy Statement and Action
Plan of April 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City has (by separate resolution) certified the final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) of the San Luis Obispo Creek Control
Modifications, thereby incorporating mitigations specified in the EIR
for growth inducement; soils and geology; vegetation and wildlife; and
land use and zoning;
R 5138 �`/�
Resolution No. 5138 (1983 Series) Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION I. Environmental Determination
A. The City Council concurs with the Community Development
Director's determination (Initial Environmental Study) that:
1. The following projects are adequately addressed in the
EIR for San Luis Obispo Creek Flood Control Modifications:
(a) Nipomo Street Bridge; and
(b) Prefumo Creek Channel Work.
2. The following projects should be granted a negative
declaration:
(a) Creek Dedication Policy; and
(b) Points of restriction at Andrews St. Bridge and
Mission Plaza Footbridge.
3. The following projects should be granted a mitigated
negative declaration:
(a) Waterways Management Guidelines;
(b) Points of Restriction, except as otherwise cited;
(c) Minor Waterways Improvements; and
(d) Street Drainage Projects.
4. The following projects require additional environmental
evaluation:
(a) Uniform Design Criteria for major and secondary
waterways; and
(b) Major Creek projects from Dana St. to U.S. 101
(projects 8 and 9).
Resolution No. (1983 Series) Page 3
B. The City Council determines that it is not economically feas-
ible to mitigate the biological impacts of the concrete channel portion
of the San Luis Creek Flood Control Modifications (reference page 8,
Final EIR).
SECTION II. Flood Management Policy.
A. In April 1983 a comprehensive flood management report was
prepared by staff and presented to the Council. This report included
valuable background information and provided .a framework for the City's
flood management policy and program.
B. Policy Objectives. It shall be the policy of the City that
waterways and adjacent lands be generally managed to:
1. Maintain the creeks in a natural state to the maximum
extent feasible;
2. Prevent the loss of life from flooding; and
3. Minimizedamage from flooding.
C. Storm Design Capacities. Pending focused environmental
evaluations, the following storm design capacities are adopted to
contain the creeks within their banks. (with freeboard):
1. San Luis Creek - 40-year storm to confluence; 50-year
storm below confluence;
2. Old Garden Creek - 25=year storm;
3. Stenner Creek _ 50-year storm;
4. Prefumo Creek - .50-year storm; and
5. Other Minor Waterways - 10 to 2-5-year storm dependent. on
watershed area.
D. Development in Creek Areas. New development in waterway areas
shall not be permitted to encroach in any manner which would diminish or
otherwise constrict the specified storm design capacity of the waterway
Resolution No. (1983 Series) Page 4
in that area. New development projects in :such areas, including govern-
mental projects, shall be required to participate equitably in waterway
improvements to attain the storm design capacity of the waterway at the
project location.
E. City Waterway Program Emphasis. The City shall undertake, on
a planned basis and subject to funding, integrated structural and non-
structural waterway improvement programs which shall include:
1. Annual, environmentally-sensitive creek maintenance;
2. Removal, from the creeks, of obstacles which inhibit
natural flow; and
3. Enlargement of creek channels, to attain specified storm
design capacity standards, only when no other alternative
is found to be feasible.
The City shall actively seek to obtain easements and/or
ownership for creek access, maintenance and construction whenever
possible and appropriate.
Joint creek improvement projects shall be encouraged by the
City when related to proposed development in areas adjacent to
waterways.
The City shall develop and implement guidelines which will
help assure that the creek system is maintained in a clean,
environmentally-sensitive manner. Such guidelines shall define and
express the appropriate responsibility for such creek system maintenance
between the public and private sectors.
SECTION III. Flood Management Standards and Priorities
The following standards, procedures and improvement priorities are
adopted as interim guidelines in the administration and implementation
of the Flood Management Policy:
Resolution No. 5138 (1983 Series) Page 5
A. June, 1983 Uniform Storm Design Criteria for Waterways;
B. 1983 Waterway Management Guidelines;
C. Creek Dedication Policy, dated June, 1983;
D. Initial Environmental Study - Flood Management Report -
June 21, 1983;
F. Waterway Improvement Priority Lists for:
1. Points of Restricted Capacity - four major creeks (June,
1983).;
2. Street Drainage Improvements (June, 1983);
3. Minor Waterway Improvements (June, 1983); and
4. Major Waterway Improvements (except projects 8 and 9
which are listed for only preliminary design and
evaluation) .
These priority lists are intended only to facilitate the
evaluation of capital projects for funding; and
G. Flood Incident Management Guide, adopted June 7, 1983:
SECTION IV. Action Plan Development and Implementation
To initially carry out the City's Flood Management Policy, the
following action components shall be developed for Council
consideration:
A. An agreement with Zone 9 which would provide funds and dele-
gate the responsibility to perform the maintenance on the major City
waterways;
B. An ordinance which will: (1) clarify the creek maintenance
responsibilities of the individual property owner, and (2) expand and
strengthen the City's ability to deal with litteringand polluting of
the creeks;
Resolution No. 5138 (1983 Series) Page 6
C. An analysis of the opportunities which are afforded the
community in creating a storm drainage utility or assessment district;
D. An ordinance establishing a permit process and appropriate
fees for inspection of storm drainage improvements;
E. Setback lines for the four major creeks;
F. A program which outlines the feasibility and cost (both public
and private) of requiring installation and maintenance of individual
flood protection measures;
G. Development of internal procedures regarding documentation and
investigation of flood damage and claims.
SECTION V. Amendments
This resolution shall be amended from time to time in order that
its provisions will remain current and represent a comprehensive
statement.
On motion of Councilman Griffin seconded by
Councilman_Dunin and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Griffin, Dunin, Dovey and Mayor Billig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilman Settle
the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 21stday of June ,
1983.
R IE G
ATTE T:
CI CLEAK P LA OG
Resolution No. 5138(11. , Series) Page 7
APPROVED:
r" a �
City Administrative Officer
Asst. City Attorney
Public Works Director
/-Zz
- A1TAC�MENT 3
Findings
REQUIRED CEQA FINDINGS
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
Waterway Management Plan EIS/R
I. THE PROJECT
A. PROJECT PURPOSE
This Program level EIS/R addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed San
Luis Obispo Creek Waterway Management Plan(WMP Program). The City of San Luis Obispo,
the County of San Luis Obispo, and the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (Zone 9) serve jointly as the Lead Agency for the preparation of the EIR
and have permitting authority over projects in the waterway and watershed. (The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers is the federal lead for the EIS.) The Zone 9 Advisory Committee includes
representatives from affected agencies and parties (federal, state and local)within the watershed.
In 1996 the ACOE requested a comprehensive plan for the SLO Creek watershed. As stated in
their letter dated May 6, 1996 (Appendix A of the EIS/R), "the purpose and focus of the
comprehensive plan is to ensure that aquatic resource impacts are first avoided, then minimized
to the maximum extend practicable. The plan shall include a) an analysis of alternatives that
meet the overall project purpose of anticipated flood control needs, b) identification of habitat
quantity, width and location of habitat fragmentation, and c) mitigation measures to offset
unavoidable adverse impacts."
Therefore, the WMP Program is a combination of policies, programs and plans that will address
— in a regional, or watershed-wide manner — flooding and flood control, erosion, water quality
and ecological issues in the SLO Creek watershed that can be implemented with approvals from
various regulatory agencies. The Waterway Management Plan(WMP), the Stream Maintenance
and Management Plan (SMMP) and the Drainage Design Manual (DDM), referred to as the
WMT Program, would, if adopted,provide a consistent management program for the SLO Creek
waterway and watershed.
The WMT Program will replace the current City Flood Management Policy ("Pink Book",
adopted June 1983) and will augment the City Engineering Standards and Specification (1986)
and the County Land Use ordinances and "Standard Improvement Specifications and Drawings"
currently in force within the watershed.
In addition, the purpose of the WMP Program is to allow the City/Zone 9 to obtain either an
ACOE regional general permit or individual permit for Category 1 and 2 actions described in the
WMP. Category 1 and Category 2 activities are actions within jurisdictional waters that
encompass standard maintenance and replacement or improvement of existing drainage
structures, or repair of banks, and maintain channels through sediment removal and vegetation
management.
Upon approval of the WMP Program, the City/Zone 9 would submit an application to the ACOE
for a permit that would allow Category 1 and 2 activities in the creek based on the yearly
10-8-03 1
Findings
submittal and review of an Annual Work Plan (AWP). Each AWP would contain plans for
proposed projects within Category 1 and 2,consistent with the WMP, DDM and SMMP.
The WMP Program also recommends a preferred method for improved flood protection by
including a series of prioritized Capital Improvement projects that have been selected after
thorough review by the City/Zone 9. These projects are Category 3 projects and would be
subject to further(tiered) environmental review prior to implementation and would not be part of
an Annual Work Plan (AWP). These Capital Improvement projects, combined with drainage
design guidelines (DDM) and stream maintenance and management standards (SMMP), are
proposed as a manageable program to reduce and control flooding and bank erosion along the
creek and its tributaries in an environmentally acceptable manner.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The WMP Program covers the entire SLO Creek watershed. While focusing on the main stem of
SLO Creek and Stenner Creek, it also incorporates the following major tributaries to SLO Creek:
• East Fork of SLO Creek
• Prefumo Creek
• Froom Creek
• Brizziolari Creek(tributary to Stenner Creek)
• See Canyon Creek
• Old Garden Creek(tributary to Stenner Creek)
• Davenport Creek
Various alternative solutions for floodplain and stream corridor management were developed and
reviewed by the City/Zone 9 (WMP Appendix D). The solutions chosen by the City/Zone 9 are
presented as the WMP Program in the three volumes described in the following sections..
1. Waterway Management Plan (WMP)
The WMT provides the background and organization of the Program, including project
objectives and a summary of planning procedures. Waterway management needs are identified
in the WMP along with environmental sensitivities, and opportunities for habitat restoration and
enhancement. A Watershed Management Framework (WMP Section 4.0) provides goals and
policies addressing flooding, erosion, water quality, biological resources, land use, societal
values,public involvement and education, and interagency coordination.
A Flood Management Plan (WMP Section 6.0)outlines the preferred set of Capital Improvement
projects that the City/Zone 9 has selected to reduce recurring flooding problems along SLO
Creek. This "Capital Improvement Program" is a conceptual description of major projects that
will require additional environmental review as more detailed plans are developed in the future.
2. Stream Management and Maintenance Program (SMMP)
The SMMP identifies routine maintenance and repair projects that may be undertaken by either
public or private entities, and provides process, policy, and field procedures that will be adopted
by the City (and the County)to guide activity in the creeks. Mitigation and Resource Protection
10-s-03 2
ATTACHMENT 3
Findings
Policies are presented in eight categories (SMMP Section 2.0), identifying requirements and
action-standards to support the goals and principles of the Program. Best Management Practices
(BMPs) cover conditions for design and work in the creek (SMMP Appendix A). Policies and
BMPs in the SMMP are intended for use on all projects (maintenance or construction) to avoid
and/or minimize adverse impacts caused by the implementation of those activities.
The SMMP also establishes procedures for planning, implementation, reporting, and
documentation of routine maintenance and repair projects through the AWP process. The AWP
requirements include identifying stream maintenance priorities for each upcoming year, and
packaging the submittal of those projects in the AWP for review by ACOE and other permitting
agencies. The AWP is intended to assure the reviewing agencies that all AWP projects are
designed using WMP Program policies, design standards, BMPs and mitigation practices. The
appropriate regulatory agencies may then rely on the WMP Program and this EIR (and the EIS,
once approved) for their environmental evaluation of the AWP projects, and in preparing long-
term permits for routine maintenance activities in the SLO Creek watershed.
3. Drainage Design Manual (DDM)
The DDM provides design guidance for development projects and drainage facilities
improvements in the watershed. The DDM guidelines address 1) hydrologic and hydraulic
analysis methods,2)open channel design, 3)culvert design, and 4)design standards for drainage
pumps and stormwater detention/retention facilities. Design and implementation guidelines for
bank repair and stabilization (emphasizing biotechnical techniques), erosion control, and
revegetation are also provided in this volume.
The DDM will be used by the City/Zone 9 staff for design of public projects for stormwater
drainage, flood management, and bank stabilization and restoration. Private property owners
seeking grading and building permits within the City limits will be required to follow the
guidelines and procedures presented in the DDM.
C. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (PROPOSED ACTION)
The Program activities proposed in the WMP,DDM,and SMMP were organized into component
activities (program action elements) for environmental review. Program activities have been
separated into three categories based on the level of regulatory and environmental review, and
degree of complexity of the activities.
• Category 1 activities are CEQA-exempt and typically do not require a Section 404
permit from the ACOE.
• Category 2 activities typically fall under ACOE jurisdiction and require a Section
404 permit. Consultation with or notification of other applicable regulatory agencies
is likely required. Category 1 and 2 activities are anticipated to be adequately
assessed and permitted with the level of review provided by this Program.
• Category 3 activities will likely require additional environmental review through
tiering,due to their size and complexity.
10-8-03 3
AWIP5f3
Findings
Table 1 below lists those proposed action elements and identifies the anticipated Category
designation (1,2 or 3) for work to be addressed in long-term permits related Annual Work Plan.
Table 1 - Components of the Proposed Action
U
E W y C
LU
Of d' • W w d
m
LL r gn 3 LU CD C
Em Ix w
io R Z O O O `' Q i
GO C7 t9 U' v x c = j
H H F 42 LU
d x CC C
PROGRAM ACTION ELEMENTS ; a w v cal v O m v v
STREAM MAINTENANCE
Sediment Removal-Minor SMMP Section 32.6 X NMFS USFWS CDFG RWQCB
Sediment Removal-Major SMMP Section 3.2.6 X NMFS,USFWS,CDFG,RWQCB
Trash Removal SMMP Section 4.1 X CDFG,RWQCB
Fence Repair SMMP Section 4.1 X CDFG,RWQCB
Graffiti Removal SMMP Section 4.1 X CDFG,RWQCB
Access Road Maintenance SMMP Section 4.1 X CDFG,RWQCB
Repair/Replace In-kind Hydraulic Structures SMMP Section 32.7 X I NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Repair Bank Stabilization Structures In-kind SMMP Section 32.3 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Repair/Replace Revetments In-kind SMMP Section 3.2.3 X X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
STREAM MANAGEMENT
Upgrade Existing Hydraulic Structures SMMP Section 3.2.7 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Vegetation and Woody Debris Control SMMP I Section 3.2.5 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB CDFG
BANK STABILMATION AND REPAIR
Repair Sites 1-48 WMP Section 5.4 X NMFS USFWS RWQCB CDFG
Install Erosion Protection- SMMP Section 3.2.3 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Ve etativeBiotechnical Techniques
Install Erosion Protection- SMMP Section 3.2.3 X X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Structuralllnte rated Techniques
Install Erosion Protection/Habitat NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Enhancement- SMMP Section 3.2.3 X
Channel Bed/lnstream Techniques
CHANNEL DESIGN
No Adverse Impact DDM Section 3.3 X
Channel Desig2 Flow Re lations DDM Section 52 X
CHANNELIMPROVEMENTS
Constructed Natural Channel DDM Section 5.3.1X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
By-pass Channel DDM Section 5.3.2 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Modified Channel DDM Section 5.3.3 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE DESIGN
Conduits,Culverts,and Open Modified DDM Section 7 X
Channels
Stomiwater Management Facilities DDM Section 9 X
10-8-03 4
�Y
Findings
m LU m
E W U) O`
W /x W L
W V C O
C LL.
r N of ; 2 .r
IY Q' >w > ! p O
io Z 0 0 0 2 a a C w 12
c G r, 0 co grLU _ 2
> 'C
V H rW' !V m S c
PROGRAM ACTION ELEMENTS 3 a uWi U 0 v o g g
DRAINAGE DESIGN POLICIES
Mid-Hi uera Special Zone#1 DDM Section 3.5.2 X
Special Floodplain Management Zone#2 WMP Section 5.2.2 X
DDM Section 3.5.3
Infill Floodplain Mulatons DDM Section 3.5.1 X
REVEGETATION SMMP 28-30;41-42 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
EXOTICS CONTROL SMMP X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
WMP Section 5.5.3 NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
RIPARIAN HABITAT IMPROVEMENTS SMMP Section 4.4 X
AQUATIC HABITAT IMPROVEMENT WMP Section 5.5.2 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Channel and Bridge/Culvert Placement- WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
LOUR
Elks Lane By7pass Channel WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Mid-Hi uera By-pass Channel WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Cuesta Park Detention Enhancement WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Stenner Creek Bridges Replacement WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
East Fork-Airport Specific Plan Detention WMP Section 6 X NMFS,USFWS,RWQCB,CDFG
Basin and Channel
'These projects are reviewed at the programmatic level and will require subsequent environmental review
II. THE RECORD
The California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15091(b) requires that the Lead Agency
findings be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The City of San Luis Obispo,
County of San Luis Obispo, and the San Luis Obispo Flood Control and Water Conservation
District are the joint lead agency for the EIR (referenced as Lead Agency). Accordingly, the
Lead Agency record consists of the following:
1. Documentary and oral evidence, testimony, and staff comments and responses
received and reviewed by the Lead Agency and responsible agencies during public
review and the public hearings on the project. All files of the City of San Luis
Obispo Public Works Department and the County of San Luis Obispo Public Works
Department and the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District(Zone 9)pertaining to WMP Program are part of the City record.
10-8-03 5
1-z7
Findings
2. The WMP Final Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the City of San Luis
Obispo on October 21, 2003.
3. The draft versions of the Waterway Management Plan (WMP), Drainage Design
Manual (DDM) and Stream Management and Maintenance Program (SMMP) as
circulated for public review between may 20,2003 and July 14,2003.
4. Supporting materials submitted by Questa Engineering on alternate projects, as
evaluated in the EIR Alternatives section.
5. The Web Site, containing the Draft EIS/R, WMP, DDM, SMMP, and GIS database
with interactive mapping, as found at: http://suntzu.tare.calpoly.edu/sio—creek
6. Matters of common knowledge to the Lead Agency which they consider, such as:
Project-Wide
• The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the state CEQA
Guidelines implementing the act.
• Other formally adopted policies and ordinances of the applicable City of San
Luis Obispo and County of San Luis Obispo.
• Relevant adopted policies and regulations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service(USFWS).
• Relevant adopted policies and regulations of the United State Department of
Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
• Relevant adopted policies and regulations of the California Department of
Fish and Game(CDFG).
• Relevant adopted policies and regulations in the California Coastal Act.
• San Luis Obispo Air Pollution Control Districts (APCD) Guidelines and
Policies.
• Relevant adopted policies of Regional Water Quality Control Boards
(RWQCB) Region 4.
• State and Federal Endangered Species Acts.
• Historic Preservation Act.
• Information contained in the project files.
• Cultural Resources identification information considered confidential and
contained in City of San Luis Obispo and County of San Luis Obispo files.
San Luis Obispo County
• The San Luis Obispo County General Plan, including the land use maps and
elements thereof.
- Agriculture and Open Space Element
- Safety Element
• Local Coastal Program—Coastal Plan Policies
• San Luis Obispo Area Plan
10-8-03 6
ATTACHMEW 3
Findings
• San Luis Bay Area Plan—Inland
• San Luis Bay Area Plan—Coastal
• Inland Land Use Ordinance(Title 22)
• Coastal Zone Land Use ordinance(Title 23)
• The County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
City of San Luis Obispo
• The San Luis Obispo City General Plan, including the land use maps and
elements thereof, including:
- Circulation Element
- Open Space Element
- Land Use Ordinance
- Safety Element
• Community Design Guidelines
• Zoning Regulations
• The City of San Luis Obispo Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
III. LEAD AGENCY AND RESPONSIBLE AGENCY USE OF THE
FEIS/R AND FINDINGS
A. THE FINAL EIR (CEQA)
The City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, and the San Luis Obispo Flood
Control and Water Conservation District, as the CEQA joint lead agencies, are responsible for
administering the preparation of the EIR and will be responsible for certifying the Final EIR.
Lead Agency decision makers(i.e.,the City Council, San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District and the County Board of Supervisors) will use the FEIR as an
informational document to assist in the decision-making process, ultimately resulting in the
approval, denial or assignment of conditions to the project. The lead agency will be responsible
for certifying the EIR. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines authorizes lead
agencies, public agencies that have principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a
project and for implementing CEQA, to approve a project with significant effects if there is no
feasible way to lessen or avoid the significant effects, and the project's benefits outweigh these
effects. Responsible agencies, public agencies other than the lead agency that have
responsibility for carrying out or approving a project and for complying with CEQA, have a
more limited authority to require changes in the project to lessen or avoid, or refuse to approve
the project to avoid;only theeffects of that part of the project that they will be called on to carry
out or approve(Pub. Res. Code secs. 21104(c),21153(c); Guidelines secs. 15041(b), 15042).
B. THE FINAL EIS (NEPA)
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is the NEPA Lead Agency for the EIS. The Lead Agency is
responsible for submitting the EIS to the EPA, and for public review, after which a minimum of
45 days will be allowed for comment. At the time of this writing, the EIS is the Draft EIS/R
document and has not been submitted for public review.
10-8-03 7
ATTACHMENT 3
Findings
IV. FINDINGS
The following Table 2 contains the findings required by Section 21081 of the California Public
Resources Code: These findings are organized by individual resource issue with impacts that
result from the project as a whole or from a combination of all project components contained at
the end of each resource section. The table organization reflects the organization of the
September 2003 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the
Waterway Management Plan (Final EIR), as follows:
VII.A..Hydrology/Geomorphology
VII.B. Biological Resources
VII.C. Cultural Resources
VII.D. Visual Resources
VII.E. Traffic and Safety
VII.F. Air Quality
VII.G. Noise
VII.H. Socioeconomic Issues
VII.1. Land Use Plans and Policies
10.8-03 8
ATTACHMENT 3
c �F� t � Een m 4., Q C
`-' Eci2aCi > O
W
CL =[L ,: dam ° ; ' � aq c
CL
co
og co Gw) LV
na o c 14
o _ E 0
r ._ E m
c oo E cow' cg O2 R
oo @ C 23 c D m r ona :on
m (n
ma m CL
o m a `c�4 f4 8 8
cc n< c c c 'c 'c c c
N �•' O II 'V
'H •f
_0
� O) O) Ql D) O) 'N m
Qf � pl Q Nl 'N
II
o
C3 m
.Q
m
Ea "
m c '
2 E
nm
c E c
am
Q _
0
m E
c E s
m U m
E U .
o m o,-
> y U ar a> a> m am m m
9 O m o o O o O O o
Q E -mE tZ Z Z' Z Z Z Z
U m Q
m E 11 v
m L° UitE
yy yy
O c CD
V N N N N N d
ME CL CL
E Dtoa ".
C I J J J
OCL
C _ `' h c y CO J N N
F- o f —Q .?: o c o 0 0 0 0
11 B C "_-
J N c
m Q <,. of vi fO v t x. c a N
E II m C m N �C ="~ m 9 ``N, m M 0 S 01 d.
U) E r � o -9 .2 .2 N m $ c a ti g c 8 -
m m y m y E �P m - = c 'F 3 y c n '� o Q
m m m N > N « O : m m v m N C m 0 C O C n,
m m :; t E t o m v o 'cy� N o '� K' m e m c.
m is h E rii ani Ti c L nm m 3 = d o5 aEi c E aEi n
Ri'm 3 0 . o •r E �_ m � m m -9 -o csc � com> a' o
° � 'p arEi �cm o 2 0 Q iii �m E C " E m m N $ o c a l e a m $
.3 s E E c gg S .o m m m m E m Y
w N E_ ; o � 'Nti o LTi wm oto Ea o_� 81 m yc o c
W m -�• j i = o. m = n m p m m � E � • bi m yr N,a`3 ,}Q ioa o N
J c o5E o � E o � EJ3 � �q m19 �emo c ma c
W E U E m E o E B m m iB c L w `i3m' m a' E mrn' amok
Q2oL� oi° opL° Nm mL �_ - _ m3aa� m
mcg S � _ yr t. �_ cg� 3 0 c c a � > > �Y > �`p�
$ cc -0 m � cm8 > 5 � mYE � > > N� ommcmm6
E� cCO
pm € EP € � $ mga� � �mm $= � c� m �caW � o � E
d V .wmFL2 toS. -. NcoL" E� m �. LN � NE � cv � ¢ ma 'f5 .� � t � � S.g
ir cc mW
cm 2
w co
-
Qco
� b
11 CieN M R IO N
/3/
0a N
m m a
„; = gam W
m 3 Ev m a g E
_ c m
o o E � E
W a 1OEai cy
a o'E to mCM mEm
o E n m cm `N°
momo- E a2E
h CL E 0.
L m a c
E
aE rn = � ?
-co 0 o m S E 0 E
o -
la E
U-
S Eao � Eo
M CL=
CD m �5
Ofa CO �N m N CL M N
C_N
O
3 O OO �Cp C C Q. C C C
1 IM Ea
1-u i p II O) O) _Ol m
�CL c
-
o
1 O
E
Ea
e m
nE
c0 E Q
E E
G—
_ m-
m U m
Q.
c E va
r m mV
N
O O O
Q E E Z Z Z Z Z Z-
v U t Q
m
m E 11 U
1! v E
o E
M Ua m m m m m m
5 CE m'Q= Y > Y } > Y
E m
ccc € as
CL n c z to vi vi to w
E F A J z Q O O O O
n y c
J fA
'E
E .m
> m O 0
m m o mK :s, m E _�` n c 3 -. E c m R ui
E m E m m y c C m ct c o c H m ami $ Sy c0 c a-3 c m C
L > C 'V L fd C .� m - -s E G O fa
ma aci m$ y E m °; m W `� ~ h v 5 m > v o jS m �m a) E m E
c m= E � Om �) c � 38m ` E $ ol203cm m cw �
M G m m •C m m N r0 N C O c.
{Vp CJ•Q m �p O
H fn E. N 1." E N. C' O 12 m O Y la C g 6Y L m Y¢ y L A n.•�
Z y � mw E a.s ac "v oriEE = WfS Emmm
LU E u E � .^JL m La m $ m .b9 c� a Q o c
W A �¢__ :0 v � � E $' E d o � m � m m c E w ca
E � mEm vv t0n � `oami crn0025m ' v om >.E yy
c n � � E E � cv, � m cm 3E m -
ts m o -" 0 �° mr c o m y m Ea m o oL m L
tnC� > - oY3 v rng}� o tii77L v ��taa; � > € � E E 3 E
No C c�� C � � � = Ctl
L �' C .0 0 N -0 '00 z bi8 :d.. E mY � � .o� m 'a m $ �
Ed 11 mai w CL �. ca.� 2 0t EE n c`� nm Q � w Q. araE cop w W E � E ca
c
aC i4 - f�a m UJ 1� m cn O) Of
� r r
EB
fn m en fn y N (n N �1
Q II > en fn in M toat cm MO
Y H
it CC 2 OC K 1' OC C
'r
ATTACHMENT 3
Z g N•cp mCh
Cy O
O o c ( .r p {
C 'O m m C Q r'+-�
c LL cc g . � m ro C o I'D :: ELD
e y m m e m LD E e�mi
.m.. m m �q� N to i M �° P co m C
> a 14c`� 5 � 14 O -5ofto � c may 5CL to,
LU c m � y,.E c c E ; L mLL aEi E $ � E _m E
oiE £ � '� $ 'u� � 2 m E c > m �
� E ami 8 B cc Nmui � 'N Qoo coo �oo
D > m ; m c y c n c m 0 c is c c m
n maE o �*Eg-= C m E i5 'c io oa ca = p $ tea
c= n N :5 3 c m o cc my ani c c� E o' 8 E $ E
y 12
c m � o o = m y� n's n-o '.n y m nm > am K nm
m u 6 co c � � 5 m 2 c c c t nc m CL CL
c d l O N- m `•' m 0 0 .2 0 'O >. E �,O E T a
ob o c wE E$ ; N may oa o oav
c �U U m c m L O.Y Z. �o c c i� 'o m ti n � cc v � '0 W .C.
U ' 3 cpm H ami y °� -' •E � •E � wy m cm corny
Qm O O O s O m i9 L E > N m O C Q na C O' n
oa
y N Q
C
C O C O0 L
m a
�L cmi E`orn Eos aNi mm
C j C p C f m.'a)
O y
Qa E Ecrn
o n n c 5 3 -
tu nc Enc amiv sa
o �Mm ECMD -A -
O mQ L N N (aa'. C.Y y Cgo m
a a= N
7 o° °?a c c d vc E E m E N
w c ma 's ma 's m o 0 0 m
m 'a o• m c. tr > a CL.-. N
p` n m d c._ an d o a >
u0 -cE m � o_ c
c pa om2E ommE Ecc CL
v �O � mfmfy � mrn ,n - iom � E_
C in N y Q d N E 0 -��-..'�' E
m n m n n CL O'= y
ts OW SM
my na y CL >>> my Vc -SjOp
E mei E E m � E a $ m N nn
c �
3 o p o c c c c
is E a 8 8 3
v w n¢ 'c c c c s Y
.0) O) cm O)
p � a
U
d o m 0 E y
d a co CD a c_ S y m Ji mm
> m m e E aai nm E m
m
2 E m $ m c aO..o -S S `o
CL
m y 8 Q � w o.`m cv
c E e o N
o Em3 �, nom .. •- 3mm
CD EL
m E c0 y d E c o i3
m C CD Cc
ca 11 U "C�' .0.. W y CO C O1 a
U ._ y n .O - m
E E cC � S EE Ha ni ,N E � �
D m U Lr m 2 a y m X G x
a `-° pm o 0 0 o a 'Qcc .oErL-6 mig
Q ES E z z z z x n m $ N m S o x m �$
E c >
U m c
m E II U E
io V p E
m CMU m
E
:. c m
cc cr.
06
O.dc cc J J J CA U) J
E H G J fQ 0-
J_j
.U) E m m $ 3 N y y
a) > - > - N a p m O m
m m e Ol m t O t
CL m m O y E C -G 0 L C C H C L m 2' 9 � .m• y m m
E in E m r o m �= aa) s " m $? c. v > 1O N > fO S yy m •2
m- - U y D U NCL
� v c y > am.E v am m 8 of o p i° 5mpu� Z_. (D
r m= m .n m a N (�O y O C 't"' v d _ Ti N (D1 _ V a .D C .D.
CC C C E c y o _pp m U o m L C c J m m J N m c E
�c m � cS � catcm = OnB ; O � c� c � oN �
M to Will W ,_ *i c E -- y m L N c.v S CAE E CO E o y m O m Y E
F > C A O p C > E N - C m C '•' a J A c M
'2 N LU Ems. E � aa m Qw. S NQi m m E c dam. •E m yam, o •C2 �' m C S
W m $'ar E E c m E m m c3 $ SN S C .99 a Q) a o`. CO N d 'o o O �i co
p ..- :9 y a m'� - p m m y A m •� - E .6 'm >- c m 0. o
w E a � coo mcg pOyN o $ � c mo �s `c4a
ego mi° 19ca *E syLmNom (-pam om = 0'm E QtiEE �
vyi > y L C' tl/ f� m O m E V dm C O N p .m. O L m
to C) c H .9.p�O m m 06 -SO W fmi10 � O�tmil CL Ca.
Ca. 8 C25 a)
C.� a c '� nm � gm cm � og yc � �b � omnia ommE mg Eai
Ed RV a £ � c EQ £ QSc '� m BS �i 8U � 'vEU6 c � � a trScE N
WC36mW N N N N f? C?
E E _ _ts
m
e ; = Na a a o
" N N N N N
G to a
[Y Or C [L' K [Y :C-10Co
,_3 y
ATTACHMENT 3
h
7i' y mym
� G
(.L [U-1
d vm m.
m O y
m m Q m
m a E m• E Q m =p E n W 3 r° •0
O C L y C m
CL Ma m CO m E ,a
ca .92 m 0
> c v n.� N
CD o p CL E m Q 07 n
oil
'v p - me E.
c m -o
-'`'- � = m m
LL m 0 CO CL=f_A y s N
C O
$ U. c. a °i n
m V Q $ l0 N G d
_C ymy
O
v rn E¢ -`�-c o o o E o o
>d •C C C C C C C C
It a
N
It
CLE
E n c n
�m N y N
E E o 0 0
n� _
pa3.RNi S3m '8 � 3 �
Ee d
R = E m. c > a H c > n-thi > n-
�' mm 8E 0, $ da � 8 (ED
L r
C -- m C •— m C ' m
osE °) a =4 E a c� iri m g a
a ED
acro m a a atm0.
U m Q
m E 11
E! U it v
co
`? m Emit Cox m 2 m oyi m ayi 2
E ¢a
CQ J to
J
O. 6 CO a 2 y J N c N J [q
Esc J �Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u y c
C > C C U N m
. J -0 m. y 0
J m U. O
E m E ON cm - = N 'Z tii c m.- >' m e -6 5 = -6 5 m v $ - 02 -6 S
€ c�`4 W m c W S o cm a a a c _ P �= aymi m m$ y l° !g,S
ZI E= N r=cc cV E m oo m m � $ a a� �' � H � ani `' � E E n
�.
o a p -c -P c. p c �+ " m em P' n $.. (c(p� p o E _L m o o E m Y m L m O Q
co C c J ... y �- J '- m C J w m J . J •,�. O $ J. C = m 9 U J.
u mm today a� � 5E y2 :5E . ym co Etna $ Lm-= � �
_ �co � z m= E Z N - M aci y 0O Y c -6 � � m '1$ m �E = `o v �° m .m.
EIt m � oy mEE cwcm. - wp; d, m .. mmLm�. y v E ci
y= ooy 'o 2o $ m �LNm �v Q $ c� `nQFiQgmm Lno
LU y0. $'� amEQ d � EE� EE' $ { m8 aL v � (La) ca $ w nLg
LU y `I$ �i o . � � o $ 'fivY o -sc o " ��O m o o £ io $ 2 N m _ o .- �
E U O y C C C C y 3 C N C — C m y
o ::. Lw oP: CO o C � ' ME o.� E o m c_ o m a - 0 3a 0' c o m E
L a�`o .; o �� T-i a`4 `$ moo $ � �o.0co m wt i°
$ $ ga oa L ,.. c y
S' mc $ E20) Or c4crcS� � m �.+ mc�a � cS� �°m awt'ipoar� CD
c.� a �u'S o m °' $' o $ � a o � � c$ctt cm CL o 0. *2 Q W o m c m
Ed - UL 3 d NUL 3 wU E EE -o c8U cLiv U = Ev EU =.ESa mE n O = -o
- - - - -
_ a a ad a a a
- - - - -
11 �n �I ti ao Rf Ot7 .- N
ATTACHMENT 3
b
fi N y
fi to
�L V00
0 t N
N
m O y
tl .ylv
.. C Cr� m
W C m _0 2 � U
> E O m -
CL m E C y m d
MCL m t5 y
N �— Ecmc
y
ro m 00 0 0 a7
O O22 Q d ;In N
C 0�. E o a m CML
- p — � aicE.
c m m •
CL "m c .n o.a = 27 m
m O_ (a a1 y C O
a 8 iv ai a n
C N
CL
G
3 o O Q �Cp C �Cp
LO •a-r c a (� C U U C
vw E a `•F o `•c 30 0
W -O 11 �01
oa
o ccc
w
a
m
n_m m o co �° � � y
0. E Q c m y m E 3 m m y
m o U m o d y
m c E 3 $ tn E m c > � c 7
y m= °' a E 3 m 13 o 0
LD
c. m m0 c _m y '`'S ton _mv
c. E c d v o.N E r co
c.
.�oT H U m (D ts y O ami m 2 -6 Cm X c`3
mom o a a .Q: > o a = d
Q E c E 2 2' S o.� o Z 2 S m y m �$
y U t Q
m
m E11 U E
m 1! U p
o ON 11m
Um m m (D aa) m m
� Sa 1O
E m
:. o as
J J
A 0 N a 1¢
o a c N x m N N to to J
Ego o
II m c
J w m
cE
`o E v `° 'o vo c
m _!A C N a7 C N lC6 C m -0 >�y
wpp o m y. E m E o+ c o o
E yyyN S N N C O N t3 m o m N O g N N � Ca E m
m E _ 5 O > > y m y 0. 0 - 0. m N d jp H �[
CIS
U e .o � � � m 0 c 0 .0 t-CC CO nCDS Co E y mr E a
0 dx `-� $ mvo � E $ mS � i > c• m9: = > 7v.� `� 20 (Dmc
L O Cc O N p to O S O C O F F t. w a7 {_ L N y 0,C r G N
Co c'c J a,C Q 3 J a ,t pc -:5m .S to .-. 0 3 Co , 8 p�'m m U y
H W m CD c ( E CO C $ 0 - y y 0 m E y m C
g � m �'yo m � N? > -0m3N mac cr � S � m
W CC Ea daas }�° ogE a2wm dvSm ?� •c S 'E •Zo '° cb
Ti = e cD �' P m 'v 332 � � Q c y 2 'c w � � o mti� m e
W CC d S I E m a tr C y t '7 L p a m 0 a C.tS N '0 � m a •ate; [n-
J to ~O y .m. C r C W S Lm O 2 C w:. y W 'O'� `� N a/ O N O > O C
E YS' od oc0• c oca._ o a._ y
Lu to 3 oS � t 3 c c w 7 c c E 1pS c c E � � c E ofR
ti yU o a+ co g om c � '� c om ' mo
a Y3 � E E � $ p o w �' c'o'itn �.� yr m E m o y o � v
O C Cm (p a 8 c Q� p
yy C 4 'C y 9 C..... 8 _ Ch 7 .e .0 C? 7 N E " C Ey y Cmp1,O .G
0•K 11 C 2 C m G 10 f0 c 0 0.32 m cc E H C O O i-" � H Co p�.H � m c CL m "" O y m y C
Ea tf c� 8if Ev E80E $ w m c mc0co 8 .5 EL) a) O' $ � L10 cc -0 d o
to m ui
y a _E EA'? A7 "� `�?
-
• t' $�
LDrn a a a a a a
- - - - - o
at w w w c c
C 0 r $ NG
Em9-2 8' m
H m •� C
v as- EL mpg. m 0 E
W cq+t ca =C p��� Y O m
O r, O 04
1)
cLO ommE �� `-° E oa
CD
CL O Ola. > a s c n L a r tm C
7 c- m R O C O m` m 0CD O
N �� mEcD E2' )
maJsc
? - gym m E
1!i H e n c :° CD n c n
�$ ¢ 0 -6
m ma Lam y3 �
c
c o
m a
� c
_� E a
- �jQ N N N
N a C C C C
LD 33
O a
n .
CO 1 -vNi N
E c v >, o p>..m m OI � E m_
> of L C O N Fi d A p r N
G E Q m n' O U- m N C O O N
0 E Q c n y m o $ 0 cca
c� Eo cEmc � aciEE g > >
Of m- j O
g V 11 W � � '0
cm ¢ cn 0.. CD
cc
E C d C M 0 rL E'� m C' rL '�
CD o1V O Sa g �p N rL m la m'� O
ms a E2 iR o � a as o
v m 0c, xO xgxm = ?= 'E _ = a
Q E S E at a Nana nava aat
Uc
m
u
m E u E
0) C U
Cc
U N N N
E C a
w OC ca
++ O Q J
C. O. c I'm= fn Cn J
E HT c _3 '.-maa-¢ o 0 0
u � c
J U E
Fi A v � c. ' 3 vQ � oCD
6 m .> mE
m 11 Q c a g` S y E a m m m o t E m
E E 84) mm t6coomc' ac •ELLS >% Cc a" 0 � g� E
0 ,0 a; n Nav a2^ 2 aoi o 0 o m v -: o ca c.ia o c °'
c `� v -6 E r..+ c c. n rn 00 00. E �•Q E c N E:a O = E{ S
m R� m 7 0 O m � 4 a+ a m c" v aa)i a m e 'O= yc E pc cS y.tLam
CL
O y G•O O C V ^O N C O m m C_ �y .r.J m `� N C C G m l>a U p.
cn ccc ziOOcmm2�ivEO.aE2 aO3La '-s timm 'OcE .�•om �E
u M1O n wrnc � Oy`- coL°.c vrnS10 cL,, O"Om 'omamiEw 0 m E
IZ tq E� E me� � E $ m •o � n if
m a o ` S �-. c U 4.1 m ca m E C mt
J y_ m 'A Qr� ma NYO °: �m c i.v oa �F cc m � O & nv �� � x 3 -5 L'ca � w ca
W E II g b1• m >' m y cm 0 O m O C 9 N p C
Uc c > tcaoccc $ c OEo.inm � � � � mmmNEVmmS mamca �
i ovyt �am� o $ �+cayc o�tn ocZQc 'eE oma.. > 0m
L a 8 m 8 m E - •- QQ c �a o
v Y! m m o c E $'c w m E a 2 m- m O S'n�' dS m aNi 4D .� m o
mC9 �OL it 2s moc � cQm � �E € EA9 � $ o � i3Y cc �CO 0BamoE OW mal
Ea ts ct� d W E o or€ E va = E � 8 na) F— E�� m m0' ci E m �� � �3v
'aw
in m E
c4
E-
o
_ �1
cn a a a M
a a > O
a• 11 a' - N f7
E � _ = C
ATTACHMENTS
c00
ca cm
100)
C m m -3 C C p G O i i,• p C h a m
CCU N w FD p 'O y .�, C f ''. g c
(L Lmwg c` cmm LC Wy E mm - c�+ °=
m m > m3 L° o E c °•)' E Om D ` w a f6 N m mL c m
v c m � m N - w N $ aEiV; c N' $ g co E w aE
> a
to `� c 2 a E cv aS c � m w m� EA
LU CD m crn � EEmL� a) hc2a mEE � co Lm{ ma�i $ d
O O m 3 c Q cq 3 na �$ Lm y c a d m_E_ _:_ o R v
o m c w o c .s y c c: E y �L-. m E ; a•c m
mm E -a ai mo .o $ mn`o En 4) aa)iecweo
E c op .
U) m c c = Y y > rn rn y O a la a. co m CL > c -- m c c
L
W -O C c C c a a s G.� - _ ! N O € w .N d
cm to a cc aa) m $� 2 w rnE � 030- ¢ m � � 3 rn ` ac d�
c 0 O .o ? $ m a m = m o y -o Q w d .'° E y m °�..a cm ` w ZD Q
c cw 2L-E E cu '9 e0 -A , E � E o � � L m � 'm C) aoi c.c
LL N C 3 N t > cm c D- U E y u, H m O .w. *:a E N N C > a - -
a
om °' � wove % mrn �am $ � c "^ mEE c -2 -0 ; o � o
mQ yt� o o $ m m Q c o E c w dd c'm Eo nE - a m
m� tYOaEcE � = n (mW dnd Ew QMrn0dc� Eo.
c
.E yo
3c � o c c c c c
O
3 R ma
to 8
'o n¢ c 'c c c c
to o II rn rn a of rn
maa c c IS c c
Da -
II ..
c
� N C 2
Oc � c. O ca W C, tt m
�Oi d C
W 75 c w O m
Ec 3 'c $ nn aa) S? a) m � vg.� m > owm
QE °' � $ Q � fOymcOcw _S cnom' W � m
"> d '� >. 'O 'o d cs "N
c EQ m � d Na mm �acimmxwaciImc'� olc
o E d ,� a' �cE .Ew
m E o c € Q m m m 'o `S' Q CL CL o 3 m m
$' y ma € � o 5 E m io y nmra -0
`cQ v
U•cc ll W acl LL we Q� 3 CL o 0 o c c _ no m
m E5 U t� 0 m C Ci at a fa 0 $ C aci C. O uD c
c ca g `o g m E �� c 'o ca) cL L E > i mTa
CO wV � m gE � n � y �' iA ("D m $ � :2onm
'o 0 m 2 n. 2 rn S `o o a o e>`o aEi't m L Q 05
c d m c n r
Q E cE a � am a � Z mrrn � ww doEm3c� mw
� c >
v U $ 2
A E It ? CL
E
cmtmUm
c U nS Y Z . Y >
E
o € as
O Q
J J
CL d c W= N N _ (q In
EFc J -ad- .. D O = 0 O
Ii m c
J (� E n
m mL wmmc d � oco � c m 8 �
u E L � .c o t5 m vi p � a �m 11 m .�, E m p=
E m $ H m c m e E m L Q 0 m •- c
m m N m a ,� t A
cs am E c c 'v E m E mm E > c m ya a $
mm m $ o5 ? $ mm FiwL° y E(pSdm � yrm L o
c m_ m .E mc .o E a= t�L QLa E ,++� •'�' € Y 'o c `o m
L m L o m € n E E Y m ai :i�AY` gym,- -m ` x m °Ji
to c•c >, L N v ,C o f
F W E o� E $ m w � i co c , 3 w N- w $ c ' n" E $m
It LL W A m A y
Z fA cc C..:.. m U c - 2 E v Y m w w C m m "' C
LU E= E .a o c m - E c m E l m $ L° E y
�+ W m m c Ym w o w m E° o m o c k c c w c -
W cl co N •� O c v H c a y � � •- a
J E 11 •' Q O fa a s W 'w na =0 a-m &,c rOiJ N O ,� S 12
W U�c a m£ adi $ ^w-'-' oa .'. € m E -� € m € m yp. E cm
m `o E y E of
E rn 2v' �� ma H m m m� tm m m $ c - W, E y .2+�F.ti
�+ C7 c c$ � ma W acio"wi � ` `o �' ac) QrHEEmLmp3m
w � m� E w E E cY a. w oL m2 � cL ���pp m 2 G c m Etc at
CL 11 c m d- •O 'W C m d.y y T+ C y U d '.7 w '�L rm. w m
Ed - = tai � omEEELQac3Q �'Ea y'aa5m`ogom
m W WCP .
wm E E co
: m V
Oto a a a C� coc
tl tY v cr
0 fA 11 Qr a' �. '- N
L a' 2 2 ma'K K
A in1
ATTACHMENT 3
e o, 0 CD� w rw me vQ�� � m � g�o a a�
cc o ErLiicE � omL' >w .5 > �i
m Eo N cc oao Ev�pmo L ~ ma mtL cc
m N a .7 C m Q m N N C m '2�i •C 8 8 3PL3
LU C p�7m � CL > t � a nN m Cm � Cm ?
> O°E � E m .QE mN •0 t E. 0-
Se
v � �
{ v >.1 m 2 r m .9 c c
. D E � a 0 a � ca � m 8 c N x Fd .o a W a
c �a c m vi cvi c c"Nia � m cg E E
c= c 0a'a �' m ca c ao�m aam E n E a
�+ •L_° m c cm �� E o.> am c.E � cv °D m d m
N �� m -- y ; m .mrnm m `o .0 m y NL wa
c 1 E %° E m '9 E �- � vim ai mw � c � � w Ev Ev
v �p E m rn 2 m $ � o c E ¢ 'aa m E o 60 m m m
c
.0 i6 ami r o E+ �' m m w E an d `a E o ~ in E rn rn
u mo wcc c -a) C'm � � CL W oc � 2_ � � s EtsR vat
O Q > m m rn > .G y > > m m m > > c mw co ' o. m o.cc E ca E
EL Ti m n do n L ¢ r E dr n E m E n
co
�a
a m E '•E �c �c
c c c c c c
'm "y rn rn co
0
a o `o '�' o `0 006 FZ
0
am
mi� coa00� 0� 0 0 0
c E> 0 c m � otn oCL � o > o o ~
o - Q m o � • -0a oQ oF' ood'
Cc
c E L m c c om 0 (L od oa oa
_2 om0oom om om om om
Ti U' o � a NU 'cv cv cv cv cv
m u m o a c d o a c a c a c
m E c a ca E �? E E ui E �q E
Ow-
m m m m
El
yV z o =-° Q mOw- 0— (L � a ga} m m
tO G m ca CL cam c c a� � c 0 0
Q E c E z Lr m oma ca ED mm � m m3 m3 m Z Z
'o U L Q
m
u
cc
U v E
V N N N N N N
E C'a
C ap j
C J J
C&7 cc N G h fn f/) J (n J
- FSO J .0
EE
Cy7 C'.Y m V
T
c C C = C C'C m m'0 O
� c5
E in E a' c d d $ cm i o > 0 c� a mrn
> .0
C m_ t ... ..m.. fa CD fa _ C Y Oj L Cp co N S .S -o W
Y mm a � � Lib' E m ^.di � Np $.a m CD .0-.4
E.2 mc > € 'S v c .0 •- v C LD (a�p N •aas vppp N 'a�j >� c �. >�L'
VJ C L Ci •_• m N Y c �, f`O �. C f� C U C d Gc N�p O 01 w�{' 'O
mmm r G C yy mm N _
II _ t] L C .Q N y N G N vi O m U m n U a C C N m
LU E� ; N �° Lima � dLDEE � - m (ED �
M = c � y y c c m
J C 7 C C O V C O C (a C e C
LU E � �' m � � ESN' s° E � �a m. E � ma) E OE
Ti � c EpL
2! -j3 m � coi �aEo •a EopV '-
m mcg E c 5a c � 0 ,0 f E, m E N c r
m m c m E 8 m m � . 0 c m m 0 m m cm W m
� o c E 2 � m - >1 mm Ev �z1 � U �cE (Np � � cQ
O.� II m N .m.. •C � L� �y ta •p 7 N mp N gym•• • n m
Ed . .9 ¢ bio co `o 5w � �atao`o HM Ea nm a c n � w Kt
0: camw
m m E E o
0 m cn cn cn Icn I
TO Q to 1�1lea v to t0 1� aD
E « L K a: cz K w 2 tr
ATTACHMENT 3
m a m O
III
m c o m ¢ cB
m > o• >.� m � � d �
C `� t. c E t agi E m w $
m V T to Tim m � d 'N
LU am ES c Q p
dm
> c _
> rnE A m n L0 m rno o aEi
aC O E c d "m• c N a o c
m° I° E c ami Ea .4 E `�- •o E
CL
� c= c°3 cg aci E nm c
ma%wmacmmamO m m c.om
ALo
v
c c0 > E c Z� � >
tT Qo E54)cc C � mE � m �
E ma 2+ naci CD n c' rno
my N �ia � UE m n E LD
nd �
C.N
0
-m �a
v' M E<
c c
U) o u rn rn
>a c c
oa
0 m mCL -O C
o d m - m m m �' at la % a m c `13 m m 3
a CL o 'oa m a CmE mt m a y o d`o � Py E o m e m
do aam > a � mS (D =0am � S a coves � cmvrnm � m � R,
nm 3a > cc 21E 8> vvom30)i� vUm6o� � o� na � 0cmcom cmo8 � �
> m m 0 m d m m n' G, m X E ,� —. p 0 m fi m h a
0 E 2 'SSU E m ._ ofvi o n > m a �a m •o - m c c mr E 2 c � E ? o
v
m cE `m � n fir `n cU crmn 'm `9�� oeco o o'cCIDc Leo umi =; X °' mEm
c.- o m my E m m o � t c m o mvw 0 32a o c ma c ao; E
z � c m �imn � o. CD
� -ev mH Epmi > m p 0 CL cL o �OB � c � c m c € m E `m a E 2 c
f m V.� O � � EY � y � W CO t •a � � moa � amore `� o -- mz o o -e •E3 m - tm
.93 X, �±+ n mELo ipmmcmc � � nmc c °� d � cv
E c�a Ilam oao« c � dw �cE � � cc co REmcm rn
w a H U Y a�° v c ami y 'cLn y -2 v -0 p cc cc 8 -�-� C c d ammi rn m oci t o m 5.'� m o' m ami
V 1p o aci a `'S > > a�' v m CD L y c ca L �8 .4 c E �v o ca yDm � � t cL W ay mU
Q E c m 9 'mm E c ma m 3 my $ and :5 mmm m cm
Vc >
m o
E U U E
M
_ cm m m
E CL m .n= Z Y
r 0 a8
c
E CL.
c-01N= N
- H C a J O O
c' m > otm
m
E E >
h m .mc :e
C O m n m
m m 8 o ECD
€ m
o E= c -
L O)C O mIV
cn C C m C m m
is m m W2 O $
2 lA �.E: ar on moo- CD m- >
W (Ea " •� m m E c �i
CC
W O ,�' tT .�.. L" m= A.
w E 11 R cav m y `c°
2 rn c Smc m E pw
t� pc _o
� •a' mm S
cc
CL II m� q tS E y m m
tf so
rw_n m E E c
_ E m O
O 11 > en
is
� g O
is m O
O N
v
MACHM I
y
QO y
ZC 0 Z' l9 CD _ W p +L•.
�t u E Its `m acing m W .� o c E E c
CD tNOi 0W7 Cr
m W CC FFt m m y dL m W C
'O 'o C W n E T c'�'O W C N E CL
W c wmnE $ c s� o � W E wE .Wi, c
WE m � a � c � mEzs
o m2LD cc E �'am ymg � m
mn L
CL
W= 2 a 2 W W 2 E "' E d C CD p) e a C au!
�_ m .2 o y m CL co
ma Q E > �
N 1O 3 m m °7 € v f4a mt Cr�i� d �W 3 3 m 0)
co 1 D) > W C d c n a) j W Q a
.c pa E ca E nW Qcc CD cmy7 ¢ E cc c =.a 'Ec �..y
rn0 } E p'v y c r W ag c `. �' c W E c m
LL m e c Wm y c > m m o aWi •c m D � g rn m m 0-
W > m nE � � coo ''moi E �� w c m yM c
dcg do
to .0 W nm ¢ � `stn
3 c C3 o c c c
v' Worn E a
_ c c c
m1 C C C
oa - - -
C3 W C W
O c > p T 1';-
m
c o W m CCD
c c W
Q E E o fW„ w { m
n> c c o W
c v Wc IV ,o '�O N '_ > cc
IDWaWc
Ermmron .WEe -5
oa E p � W �
cm
t '3 m
ED >,r- 'o Woo o ?+ c
m i� '`'° � 0V 'WnmvS � cH � � m m
E5 o p g N m m W y yy vJ O N v
W W C
'O pWer O � V W U W W p � c Y a a
W c W W .�a1 d' L� W N
Q E E E Z C%I W W 0 c+i c -0: E 'a m m m
v U r
m
m Eco tm
cc
L U
Z U 9 N N
C a W G= } }
E W
M.�
O CDCc a
at$
C J
T 7 O W
_ H C J a D D O
II W c
c E €
CO mQ 8 °vc
E y Ee W > m e
m — G 'e W O O
N U 'O
N
m 2 � W � � m
- € > W
_ O z _ €
c .O .� U
CD C C 7 N' W '••'
to W ,e O C >'
a •C
g- vE pcm ap
W E IaiL G y E y 0 L N O)
N V = O) C y W C '�'IX a CM= 01C y
J 93
E S" m �° c w ''�- o•
W V. 3Cp� .N c E t m e y
N co U C E W N CM
is a cc CD
's La
C 9
C c W O CM 0) C N a) •C e W G
Ea - o l M—
E : FL � nE
irm W Wcl
` W
ya E ECD CD 0
WA
s W
a O to > co in A
co g O
n _ � m
i K K K C
N
cc cm
Emm `a3 Ec c
LUE .� ami av c
N E m O m .-. C c H '.N a) m
o € E
%E 0 'm " ccn = c mL v m
CL =a E � E :° 3 E m —a °' °' L
7 c= E n 'tm:D m E > JS ai 3
N O� O b T C N N C N d m U m •.m_..
m t E' 3 mt E a
Is my E c n `� Q E E n c c m yt
m
�O Q m E m L m E m m E c y v
Of y m m E. CL O m d� L m m p m
LL 'N m O tm b '= m A cm '� C 7
p aEm o am � m c adw > ma =' E 2
�¢ `m n do ro a m ¢ m a 3 Erb m
c
� o
30 o
w5a
'a cm o.a c c 'c
w E: o n rn rn m rn rn
n
c
omam co w- m
c o yv mv3 EY > m
E a E w rn L > api `? m m rno m e `.3 n
me gram yocm :3 �c = � Ng
> ao Q C 0 E 3 E U m a a 3 m m - rn
m � om a oo '..momo
c E 3 .. = mov �. � mm wm m•c �'CL
O 8 maa c E _ m m c cv - m CL-0
m c E B,cCJ >6 .c m pp e.c =m ai m mo, W 4) -0
om o f 0o m mm � o m m ami y m 'm rn
L
YO u m a i m m O m r O O p C •O 36-§ 2
Y O
'C m c m :9
E CJ IW I� p m $' m o L !� m n 9 m 3 m
m E �
_ m `o E '- m o Lo
v o m c E o m m m U c c o 0 ,0
n m c L
v om o a a o ammo EV me o � m m •Qmoc
Q E 7M5 WE Z m m Z m03 _0 U m rno �3v ma 8 � m Em m
Uc Q>
m
9m E II U E
CO E v
*j V m m m N Cl)
C d m
cr
J
C. T 7 Cp ,�y J J J
Ego J a¢
11 c
J to EE o
m m Qcc 0 2 cm
� c c
O O U L
m a PD E m m t5 m 0 0 2 U
p O).c Y m m H U
H CO W'mc W .'C N C E a
F II _ C r G m C C •p m
w N E� EmmcE� mE � tw
Yi c m me m� � m - me
W m oi
cm— •c _ _ c
m 5 m .�. m w
O m 7 a _
J E N C N m m C M y C N m 7
LU c� E �' EmEL° mEmo mE
p
2 C*cg E= w EgmE2 .3
o m o o m m m m m m c m g'
m y7 Sm7 a 2
CLO c CS � m � .0 v' .m.. Ow � 'O �� 'O
Ea �� =a ata ama aW 8t
¢� m
ww
°AA E E
0 C7 C7 (D
o 6 a.
Wl Ir
K
m fn U
E w f & d' K R' K O
. . .. _ .r
LLD
z ro c m £ a> CD m m E m m m my E
> o > > y V E m -a m E m 2
MCD c m a m o L° N p» o Q1 c m •�>
G L f0 _ N E S �G+ m : c &
G7 y QQo0 E a E $'
E m c m �� Cc m C a a+E a m2
m caE IM
m w �aFi? m L � m c m m w E umi c a�
�mL° Sn� 3mM-0 (`-go n� v m °m-� � � p
OW
wa c e c c •o •> v$ a F
O. m > � m CL
p � m m Q• m
c p
c= 2 m ? ca c y o (g Ea c E p ca N
y @m En $ tla� > a� 'E cQ NmrnmEo � ¢ m c �
N 0i 6 rnEv'� ovcn _E a C as o.N �' 3 y? m .0 m
v CO JZ cr
m 6 c e �' c a g a y = 2
c IV
006 c a o c E W c 0-3 c E a m m E N N
LL G= m m m e �° Cc a v m c' a :E Cc m rn
m¢ E m ¢ CLE Q 06-M > $ E E a� mM na
m� CD c, agU m E do mm m dG N CLCD a E E
c
L°
3 0 o
CL
10 1cm Ea w
C C C c c G G
d r .2Q � .0 .tll •(A • cN N 4J MN
153
u .
O Yt
� m
C O
E a
i m
nm
C E Q
o �
R c E
11 CIS m
E V V e� cli q
OCDc d
v Cc m u c c c c
m c c
Qm Z. 2 m m Z 2 Z
U 2
m Eit E
o e U
C �'j U- N N N N N N
.1._ >- > > > > >
E a
CL i C W= J (D !D !D CO CO J J
u c
J (n E _
> m m m c' m m m •c' m o c
m Q y m > -o > o > > > m > c _
m •– m y m m m +� m C
E e-f L T L L m L O
G N c to L N E N N C
.-r m C m m m m m {= m y m 0 m m
r E= Z^ � > .$ Y `caY 0v uE ='-' icy m
p �i L •a co ai m Lu m r d m p� m � -o m m L
t m N c Y O h V 2 a _= �.. m _� p) m
cm•c 8M E m n� nyr n yL o a nc
�.- c `% �? E ' L' � Etc E � P' � = E' � E EE
LU E� me 2 � �a2 � c » 2 � 2 � � CD to
y N `a3 m a c a �j n p me E a E a
LU E y g o y m .p.
Ei � pc
aa a
CM E c3a8 (9am � � m (S � mc
�C�9 'npc y($��{ aGV� `G`o8G +iO9•' {SUOp' Y_aN
9 aYa3Cp �i
oomm YdJ-e 'be28
m lcwaXm3Y—a�ci"a�mO'
ep
a Na a a cm n .0 nnCWN m mO m n n9 ££ cs U0CL.a 5a { Cma5 'vm > C.
jE
6L
W E E Y Y
ny (Al co to c
C m
n
E i rr tr K. 0
ATTACHMENT 3
� N
tmca FB- m ��.'W. c %E. E ,o E_ 0 -9 a .
m Z � WmmL: cm
a mtS � m � nE . �c
m ca �`o �*0 L E E n .M ICD5 W no cm a o C6 d
Y p W. a W�,m :gow a s
CL C a N N 93 C n W E Sc m c a y aEi
vs -dam � cmWn� 20 $ di � � Ecumi
0 3 m cc-80 €� na S E o J o � � m $ a �a
CL c
c E � :a ` fOMw c � � c� m E Q
CL
Ll- C N - U m W a .� "WN N r a 0 a) E N a
m cE_ E0 :e cE:� �'t.nmECL0
a N Q W W J m -- •- E Q m .�
m c� E n m oaMUE W E -o 0
E c c c
tL
m +• o n rn rn w
4D � da c c c
�r n 3 5 N c oI c
d d U $ W O` Wj.-S 'n 8 W g Lmr
> m m m `o a m 'o m N ami Z m p rnE c� W O
nm `o c a�iL �' ao m E m ` cc � a E m dL)
co EQ a' on '0No °-' 0W N O :R � o � - �° m � `o
T, m .EEEEam � � mmm � � � � 6Tn$ a 'cv� _
W c E W o m c W c c 4 o W c, N .c y m o
0) m y O d W - L O Y J 0 J C lO .L O c U
C J N n - O m W C.1 m y .. 3 G a m
W Q a d a m es H ami Eo. m o a w? -m n a) c W c
Ec�clj WcWc � cc `v4 � aam mEow � o
co - i:F CD crmvo WamcmzWC0 Wgc £ EQ
'p p m :s rt.+ N W J C W E n n w m n o d W h y Q m
a m cl..2 0 Cc m
cx a o
Q mE co M cx `Qdo �' a £ $ lo om3co� �c �cm � $ 0cc z
J C >
U m Q
m E
L° U
U :9
N N
E �?
c � U
Ca o _ tq tq
F C ¢ c
11 m
� E _
m
tII m Q a`) m
E in E J a Ln c W
F my -� m > C C
W rJ c H N W
0 EW a m r N m m
= W C W L 9 Q mmN
CO 'C f0 -2 y O J C N N
z m �w � .n c m 'FS := c
W �.EQ 2 Co (U�
LU LU W � �-pi' y co r tll �.
J g !V tJ� O � tJiJ Ncc
� FOa L'i C O �g
O C S CA ': $ 'O a W N C
c0 n mB.a c $ m c C
C} p o ai
£ d O W
0 0 0'do V N y w
8 nL
o
x i
tm
07 y N _ y
11
e _ N N
C K O
r c =%g gege� 1 I
WD 0 o 2
E
C w n rJ C C •s N tl! C N A Q..• C m L
m w cap Q s m m m w cd
> o ma w mew $w �m N 'N U " C 'ri' lCC 'p•.tCO �
LU a Ta Q . w c ,. o € EnQ
0.
->C o m c EAawocy 4E) � E c � oEiL ov c o
Co. w= m v:_ m CD mom=
� m cimn �+u �mm `oEm � E a 0Ecc E - Em
a �� $ a w c �� 3 a� c.on �' mm E E 3 o L `-° 2 m
y a N + � - of Ec °' � Ec m Ecom � o
o� E � o' c c .o �- w CO y � y o w m w � ?.� - . �i
Mo c O m cm
n $ E c °� b v ` c o Tm.+ y E
c Nya m E E N m •- E mn N - mmcmc
u: 5 c c c > " and L 5 � v c End wc L° � �, m --a caEi
�mom �� 2Co.:5com >,� nmrn � c � E
m¢ Ev o Et con d do c m n = $ m Q c� w Co. $ E
c�
-;a
y m E Q c c.
n rn rn i o�
rn rn
c c
o *�
c Q
d
Ea
> m
n m
C � >
O m c7
c E
� m m m
z
cc u m pap
E U N q m
m m m
S a a o a o
Q d E Z m m Z z Z m
E c i
e E U v E
0
c d m _ } CD } 4) } (D }
E
c m
C J J
Co. n C a x N U) JJ
7
E�f"G e o¢ O =
u �
Y m L S m ts 12
C13 Q
Cc CO v c € c .o. m.
u c c y m
E U E c w c n c c "' m c c c
M=
rna �� s � E rn� mm =W cm cc ao
Em � � c m m m = s a -
mx S o m IS
m S N > >
•C N c (O 'p C W = C y C N .rJ C fO c N 'c
m C L C A C F C C A C F C ,C{p m
W L C 9 w c 0 mom. w m •`--1'_ w � �. m a U w
�LU E 1' (J r C - p c N C U A a W
W E cc 1m
cm �na3 c $ cai -mm pc > oC c {p��pv c (p�(�`o
C R m N >
Z m ai t� L � 2SNZ•> m � mN � 6 a N - N
�am � aE° c�i J .2w � mL � m $� � mam �� £
owe " o o me ocF, cN � '� vc � Cm � fOc °�'
d �� Um .- vw .. w Uwtc mt `3Sw - :n m � Uwv
qft 0 W A A I n
E E c - - - - -
- � c - -
`°
0 CIO
/-CO
e m m � $ � � c �i � r� a m c •� c � d m .�3 E c `� c p m c .
FiE 'o = m •cm _mcm d Q--6 saWm m � rr
�'Namim `6em .r2n �c�, "31OQd n > � = .mc �� acin � � c m.
Cc
$ o c m_ CL
= c E N c p' M L umi m d N m cn •rti' m m m m
a m
5LU o m
J.
n� `o aNi c� m m nes o m' v E d o cO 3 my � a
m v � � € � a m v 'S € c da m .Q > c m ao ��lu � d
> E � rnnm 0 - c m ma d m m ani 2 cc EU �m v rn
C rn c .,.. p .`� n c V Q m Q o.
d ci vi c `0 0 o cm "o m `o o o ny E .1N � m rnL nm Ea
CL CL c a E 1 = v m r L c a t v m r m N 3 m me m m n m N E E
m- n 3 m w m d •_ m 0) N
y •W �° iL E �. } — a n -� E ci > — a n... m c ,� m 3 m
E v E m o m o �i 'E N m aEi m m m m rn " Z m E vi c> d
m 0 N
COO � 3cco 9Z.m �' om � � `cs mo �o � .N � � z � 19 .� > � N ` pmE
cn E c "c m p O E n= m i o� 08. cc`.� N •c $ o nnmv CL m
oa cc ma a; mEa a mm c N ai m c ao
c0 d 0 m m c m y c d - L O c m 'm�' m a E cD E n� a c y m E m E U
m c o a E tO
LL '� a c =.U m a n.m C civ m E .c n a-Ei.o a a o a m c� o�m o n�.� o v �g
(D T m �° m t E n c c c � a`� 0 E n m �'� '� m e di - m E 'c 'S -L 'N �
w do c m � nN r� Q U m m nN $ EQ V U m m E m � � aL) v m uci F � `o
c
3 G O Q c
c {p (o
.O E.Q O 0E
d c = _11 O) Y Y O)
og
� o
da rn
a
o E Q m
a 3 m C
c E c L = N
M
c
m
It m N c 0)cl m
C E U V m �:a (y
d .N ca
.0 a m U r2 rL m
V m �' a s •C m o. _
Q a E m m m CD m z
U c >
m o
m A U It E
_C13 cm _
` U U a N N d d
rL C IL
E c`
:. o € wo
Ea c N I=QI vS w C6 co
II C
.1 coA E
O
U C > Z m m c m
m m j ammi Ol..: �s fIA G m
E m E = E 8 m p a m p C t
w� c m r �
(D m e
t �dex
.
cl) C C C C m m m 'c N
FII m m ,cm �.0 C O O C p = p
Zcl) C' U tm
m c m 9 0)=
N N N
Cri L D nL C G '�O C e V C W
� LD
smw E91
c
E 0d � yLD r8 4) �
� 8myn m Z .g1mm CD
to
g A �m m
O.0 If cym
EUcc �5 m � CO 062M
M n5
`c_U
Wft
m a m W
c ti n
m E Eo = _ — —
a — o
i°
itcoo
m to it
E
�W
ArACHM3
c N � cN morE
z 8 cM nDE
c E v
�L c •n am E 'EEn
m W Co C.'O 9 y r Q W � p N C m
c a v
v °'
> a E fO E m W cc,
md E E ma c c c3
m �E m > � Eg� m om o'e .o c E g € nnm
a3 E w am Q,M E ' T�i ca E da c i n �a
o m E E ELay L � W og = cmc 9 � =0A o 0 0
rn E CL E `wC=,
-6 m _rnm
ima N m E 16 n mv E 3 E m min o aEi g.L E E ai
11 ��pp 'o c n 3 > s o W
C a II G O) 16 C >. m R O. O1 W C E N T E C.
v �CL E � 'E E E'aa E 9 W E_ a N 6a 1O E_ W cc
CEO c6 n W W n ��. . W p m
LL h e Nn. o m ��' car M..aEi v a(Dr c m c W
m o _ c M E W c n� , W !g W c c a o W a. n E
cc
ma � W c M:e > m w m 'v mom c c QL acct E n
v o ¢ E E m S do crs c E SEE ¢ Q W W e. N $ E
c w _
•L° o
>+ o 15
o, Qa r 0 e e
q _ o u rn rn rn rn cm rn .rn
o
c•o
Ea
Q
n W
c E e
o Cl)
t6 c E
_co m E
U (L]
c 11 to (n
U
E a c%i co
y CD g
o a m c c c c
Q E E Z m m Z Z Z m
E c >
U W c
m E u b E
W L° v
a LA m d a`3 N d N N
E
c ve
C J J J J
ET CO N i �n to (n v) J J (n
H C J a a 0 O 0 0 0 = 0
u m c
J f/J E
m m
m `o c c rn S c U
W a
> C > c W > N > W > �C�pp m �C�pp 7
E a]W L'y L 'o — L n L W L' C U = U M
N c a N N N G N N '►
.m m� :pm ? Wa ay mEm ME ? 8m Ecry ? o
L o'c W NW m ':. m N � mED m � a i� m is cW
m m
� m W cc
crn Ei cor W or n or ^� S or W Q c rn B
W
Cl)
It N C N N 'C N E. N L — 'y .r.J yr Vl
Eu me W � � W � arc2 W c W mW Wv
W m
5 W m =
cocx Q N 7 C O N L � W �
m E tob mho mE W m `� mee ccc�� � ai mar mLD
m
aa'i y g = 73
-5 .2 t5 8 fi ° c c'S 3 aa) cLi > s, cLi
o v — c N N $ q ? C* cco a
W cW cm E !E c S m !E CW - pm !E cW a
d� 11 c u'S o O m o -$ O O.mr o C X � "p '�, � O 'W
E d M n N 2 n.W.. W FL n N > n m g G L nL
mw
Q• C A A A A
% : E E9
s :ai oW
c ,x, < v N
t ¢ x x z z z o
1
MACHM 3
y
rn ° E7L?
m E� c � f6 :° Ea Ca o � m w
�L c� � me ,o cm' �° LE'� m od 'Et Cr Cc0
m r tO � � nc > 'o m nM E m � a`o E m m m
3 o f cr m m m E CL Co m ma m � a n
> $ y N m o 1 m
LU c cm v ap Em oy Ecci5c `c� y
� m > . mmct, mcaZcE *- > � oE
L° CC ID 06a'2E m
cm mlc v m N �a m9 - € — o N
O 0 ec m O) O p C v m G d w m m m ;co;
y C
CL rna c � cv � mrmc -0 O 'D v >, ycm
rn 2 0 3 aa)i N m p c3 E 1Q n, m O N O1 p1 n °1M p y Ea m En
co
c 0 >rnaE oygE �cm a om gE m e'2 $m .c
E
a E 2 co rnmom § m
E ` E 16
md00" 1
V cU m
CC e p c o a c N p c 9 c t m
LL .0 w CL
Z6
SocEm � mE ��CD Ec � m � t5ccEca " mnCD y
>•m m € m E m c[ — ELwv C1m n n n�oz € acd
m¢D cL CL w mL $ E E -0 m � v mM � Ev` m ES L mm�¢
Ny Q U N 'TJ• MW
L O
W da 8 8
— M o,a c c 'c c c c c c
N !_' o a rn rncm Cl) rn rn rn
m .N .y .N .y .�
>0 d C C C C C C C C
o �
.Q
d
E.a
i
Q E E
nm
c E E>
o �
m
t � a0 U
m n m m
C E C ' N
.2 CD> rnV M
soma 0 a 0 0 0 0 a
E c m CO z m z z z z m
U � Q
m
m E II U E
co C v
_ U
N N N N N N N N
IDE
C J J J
E cp x CO vi m Cf) J J to tri
_ pig J n a O cs c — O O
11 c
J x E E m c c
fA E C O «� N C. `r L y .m—, d •�m�. •O) gym—.. d •gym Q
.E m 8 y C > E '> G N m e co ;> m 'S m. 1 �•.'h '>
m W j " m C W N 42 �a .�- co .Lm.. p m N L •j C O
mC O W..s W WNa1 MC cm L1 O1C WM
C N C O U tl=1 F H L .�O Q ,O y m 'C •� C '�
m :° m c ��� m m cc cc g m
m m m m m m m
Z to E C c rn vi `�_ � m e E w--
� E y mom m o m m m v m.o a m m Po'.2 J Co
v x v c m S E p c c N c
w m Co� d — > maw 2 .� .c �� 9 Ea axi Ea umi m ..
WII C 01 m N 'O m 'O C W C.
M ts � o, moamo � m € mac mE moEdm
a' m 08 '� L�� v E m m E p cr 019 01 p E �' E a� E�
C! c c� � a o� o mcL W � N o:� o� op off ._ ga -%
CL� II nmr 06 T j N > j j m r > 9 > r W a) � � m � > .m..
E a �� m 0 tv m m m m m a m 'e m p la
9 O t 5 N S.L O1
cc to
m lu
m A E E c °Q C CP m
u >ts
IM in C3 MO
p 0) cli
(�
K wco M in
1
ATTACHMENTS
a
cca
r nv my SO(L m E :5 c� NE m >' ga y
m m e L' m m n 0. m o y o o a L� o
c � nME � � c oE `-° gym mm a
> a cmc c0 M
o f E RIS $ W E ? E - E eo E '-' am o 3
W 9 Fm r= c L ?+ nL cp omm 0 w $� Emrnm o
`� `° tl16 E EL° v $ f - Obi c, mrno
o c m t c E an d p € m �pp c c c m a
m m N a•- m C m g � m L `N l9 >
CL ma E m c E L O7 co n � � nom' c E m a ` n
c- m P CL p '>. m aEi m p_ m N m.v m
ts c m E n
0 E a� mL E ,c n�-g o mL aEi € o a m
N � cm .o •� `° ECL c �.S $ E mem �ra
Ga Ecpa � amo Eco pEE ma wm ' �iv
�n m c S mm
eo 9 E c E me m .9 E o c ct m fO > cc
= c0) E acc
ti He 3rn'' � N ' od 0) CD N � rcny Ec � E Eoi �
p m E m CL U E mm m m m m '3a EL 0):5 m o c c. r a c 1° w 'E m
rnQ CL CL EE1 ER CD-.5 EES Ep mmam3C, n EQ � dL
m — — n L a m G Q' Q 'C CL mCL m a
C
'= C O_ C C C C C C C C C
7 !O d
'O m
0 —" O 11 0701 O) 0 0 0 0)
m m¢ H 'N 'N N 'W �N 'N 'M 'th
C ma
o
o �
c.Q
E�
i m
noEi
0 E
e Q
z � a
�. C it m m
m
C E �,'a cr aQ ci
OCD
CD
0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 0
Q E c E Z m z Z z m m z Z
v cjL Q
m
m E II ;? E
_ w V N N N N N N N N N
E U
:r O ^6
C
CL
r O
J J
CL.
O O W Q fn N J J C y N y
J a - D O
u m c
J c m
E O .0.. �C. O
A m Q lO l0 N� i0 !O mi0 N l6 lO m
E ' -``
m E m m n= CD C m n m m m n m m a
..sm a ac m �. o. N cv c � n•c Gm nN
rE_ � � 5 � rsHO
Sx ncna c rya JS x
0 C N m N L N— N m C�ppm �C�yyCc
Cq C L L L cc Q L tg L'C m L 0 i.1 c U 0• f>O -e m f>O C 0 W 0
z to �z �_+ 2 �m-A - cm
�' E > --�' _g ' yrs -- �cc mS2 .�_ mE > Nmo
W E u m v•� m o m 8 ;� v a
LU m ` � v 45'o E m v CLCD
c aZ > > m �av'
COcl _ iiE iiEN it it LLC m 5 too
w E n g m o ��w mE � c j3 m W co 8. EL32 m
� a � E m n a � m v5, o E m o `^�° . m N
Emc3 mceg `o fOLSmS 9ca ''o am aLoa { L'
e - c e e e m e a .� `o m
*0 N C y m c �. e0 c — �p c tp c em c m c r m
RU' c �ag� E � r ��
W m N— Lm NLN m lE F_ W m f=il m m !=il Lm f=il m> N W 4=1 t�iJ m
C?to
m E E.,00 -
_ ' d
a a a a a a
of
tr K
1
ATTACHMENT I
O
M � � M N
= m m a S a m L a N :a Co
m rnm a m
m od � M cc DaaeS a 0)
o c m �P co c a m ? m c a
CL p,3 moi- c � my o � � E c8
LU c w Ea Qm »- ma E mp o' ma E f°
m _o m o m Pio E c m (L c L ._ m m E c d o
> E m c m m m S c m m g E c E E cc E m m m m
Y m o o ? y 0 -0 o 0 -6 2g m m �° �° m > �� E
O a) Scac o 'A n%° nm _ m `m E �, esnUm
CL ma m o, m 8 ma m a ELa � � ami n E maw p
49 2 m o m L � � � m o m c � p� �' E'� aa c3 0�`
> >, m � .E m c E gs � M � - m c E
�O Mm c ... U) m m m m � m m� ' m� .m mt �
1 l U a 8 S E m 3 L nS c m 0 G n- c
v 0p am `Q m �S E ny' m ca E am C E aci �' a E.
C > `
c m - L o 00 . m •c v m E o E o m Q mCX
of ui E rn E o c n a E E .o E m °' y m E y = m = o m aai M
aL pao H E m c a tm m �° 8 'E c �° rn? m y o `-8- N Q m m �m .m
mQ' m m 2 Ani E L CM me m Q m:? o•Ti m 0. C3. L n c � 'c0
mo mndoc m I- mn ¢ EEmo m F- ECL m ¢ EEmg
c al
R o c c. c c c C c C c c
O ��pp ((pp
LE m E E E. 'E E "E E c c c c
CO +• o u _w _rn 0 _LM MM .2) rn _ rn M
m y Q M M M M M M M �M w "N
OQ C C C C C C C C C C
too
v
O �
C Q
E�
a m
e
c E Q
= M
m c E
cc
a
a m
O C a N N N
> 'yU m m m m m m m
'a0 m p h o O o a O O O O
a E E
Z m Z Z m Z ZZ Z m
a U t Q
A E II E
co m U
_ O
ON
d m n2 - >- >T >G! >- >- }} } }
E
FF X 2
V -;. OC
T oc m< N m m N co m J m !n m
.9 pig J D
II m C
Y m $ m �' > > > > m m
U W T m •G m m co m Co •G m o m G > C >
m m e A C m C fa C = L m L L O m 0 m
E m E aci oc o o m 8 a .8 Q E0 060 CX. E aLMi T-
c n m 8 m 'S ma Z oco
CL W `o � a yr aai > a S Z
m mm � a Sc S `.0a mm � mom m � mmM
e Ex c mla mmo m o 'E -. cy m mm mo
o Ol c m m > •Q > •c = > c c n m c m •o c c �u m CL
L m m > c m m ao m ip o m E .o m m m ID ¢5 E Q3 E y a
C12 cc mp L2ai c cc w0 Em E � 3 ELmEc c mm
II y cL i cg a c E a c m e m cL
z co mQ Z -mM > = a E = m Ec - Q - Ems. > r > � c
EWi :a m •S S S p S no •c np'2 n� m n� 8 m
bio E1x > a ot$ v � m s E 8 n E M € E MS E M c nM c nM m
J y W Pi mnm mm "= m `a�4 ` G e' m L' o 20 0 me
E .II c E >. Nv � o .� is -9 'a
� oyo .m o �m o .►
Fi � c =0 a W � t � gca tummy mmm` 'mma �mmacicmmamo
m mcg � cm 8c � 8cp 8c Lac t = � cLomt = E = Eta ?
rw 2 cc
�S - Ea � vCL
pi '2p � E -mcn£ .s cn m •u 'm �� 'anw •on•e..s
Ems. I� m� m m m �ox m X �' X m y csi B m -am nm X nm cm a m mt
IL � � w m wELw $ m � S � m wS M > � S mS m ¢ S m ¢ ba m
ac m c � °rn° C9
� rn rn rn rn rn
in LI
E E$ _ _ _ -
m
x b �
Q w > m U U U x x x 2 x O
L42. K Ix
q Q (nt0
co to w A A N
E 2 K C CC R' ¢ Ir
r�
1l�
ATTACHMENT I
m M m N
Qitlie
n c
t_ m Q
l0 Q m m C m C a Z'3 g C
w a cc 1° Eba_ m nWQ ornin 'o w
> o,E cL._a E E -o � € anm cL m ami a
63 �° m m m d � c m o maw U mti
p iii o � Q
n m Co'cQ Qiq m � c 0r o.�{ c
CL c'd m m o m amv ma m o 8
c= Era c p a > rn m N m E y
H EaEi 0 o Est E - E y SSL w $C
wm � 3 > 9a2 � � m QoHT-
oa m m E E a.0 = � - (D
C �0 CL E' O E L cc y yy m d E N
LL O= w >p C Y C m O.N d ] 3m
v m n o. >..c . m E _ m m N •S.
m Q L O.' G m G m L p IC m
F— E m 6 r m m G w 8 E Q U m y �.
c
3 c O
o ca
15
m E- 8 8 8 3
'o cm a
w ._ o u rn rn M w M
>d c c c c c c
p m m p
c
E � a
2 E m N
v ,Q
c a`�
c E Q m a E v
A c E v c m 6. h
E vm m � � �
U -c
Ta L) c
ID
= a
C ca � i E � p
m m m m �L. 2 X
v m m c c c c s y a
Q E D E Z 2 2 Z m m m aci'�$
U r2
m
g! U o E
Im .-
0 TSU
N N N N N N
E mm
x j
p 05cc CD
J
O. O. C W 2 fn J J co V)
II t�C
J !Q m
C > > C > > pl > C p C t _� m l9
m m Q L L = L v C m t -�
E II E m w ow N 7 r E rn
v N CD V n C m
°3 v o Lcr
' w o C7 Q
E �o � E Q E > == m o mo p `a�3 a � CIS
m,� m l0 '— m b m C m L N m a .o-� m _1 E m C iC .
HCO m m E t a E c m E m E m E 'e .cm. E -M aE .9) m a
H II mm mc .o.. mcL me mc . CD L" .- cE "o o.
2 Cl) > '- > -- > -- > -- . > H O m m m c E.= N �o
LU E n e = 2 Q = m Q = L = �i Q -0 a N - m oa o N
i x n 'm CL oy 06
CL m rL c3cm
to S¢ Ecc
E o E m E `��{ c E _ N U p m r c V J Z 0
�j g .a m a m' 79
-5 a m a m $ a L a c-v p c a G
Q m :� C m m m 9 m 9 N m ami € m E y m. m m
� U�+ L' C p L C L C _ L C L _
tom'! c �p a �� aSEa � � :ao � a = " CL �' �1 �gm25mm
co
CL a CD7: A cc CO
Via) cm ` 'camp mt
aIrmiI'o am m `o� �i �i �i o
4 ETs
E a
w Q p m x x x x x a c
/ � I
m
ATTACHMENT 3
c o c Q
W IL 0
m W Q !D
2i m m
op � W n19 c
n $a2
CD N
'ta N E CL g
N p C > W
c p a r a m T
L �
c - F
c rnFa� mmE
_ w
LL maodEms
c p o
o
W m a c c
M
a ca
iCL c c c
p
n .
p � �
t_c .5 m
c a v v ZSIS
m r m
2 E o a
d> t4 m m m d.
0 E 2 '.. 3 m -g -a 3 m 's M 3 m 'E m a 3 ami
C E C m a N N c0 W A N g m.a N (y pC m a N
_� ts L- m.0 cn O �� $ O 8 m 8 d O 8 m O U
3i CO w
C13 �5
E �U .0 CD in -- M W a, •- � � •r• a
a N o � � � g o c� � Ego 1v � E o
s W .y U �.� c X �.� cc.X " m � co X m m m c 1C
mm9m �s � � W � > W � aaa � m
'O m p y as c a) .a aa � W na - W n.
Q E c E mm a) mmm W �8 mm m -S mmm m -S
o c a
U W c
B I L
E U vcm
E
p
CL
U a m d d m
E � ^
r. 0
C J J C6
CL n c z vi U) =
EFG as O O O
u W c
J fA W
v i �.� c 5 E
W -L 4Dcc 0
E co e d E € c Ws E C' '2 W gv a� aciv Ev ; v y �
m1O -5 8 �
�r E .2 c WO'
L W c m v Zvi c � `� mYU3 c • r' ' n3o
m E m o € v o vp v g o € 3 a co c � a o o W a m y 3 m
S O C .:J W W W m d T C d
O w e Ts 'E W 'Ei c W m uni m r p c a m E •zW' $ a �' W m
L c W O .+' L n 8 v U p .O 1•' •c ;p E 8 W �'L C CO
to c c c n � a m 3 m c e mg m m c cc c a� W `o m " c m c� W e
o � tc' a m Q c -..o W £ rr1OcwL � `� o c 50 ,0 W Q m
z rn g c � mmom $ sm W
LU Eu aa`ov ELcnbWm - oc oac 'i5� v n SEnda�
2i = m W = �°� aa) m m mEc E mmnn� gm CD Cc
gm .c..a
W W ¢ m a c �` �. 3 0 /� �? N W rn ui rte- j� o co£ v W n iNu
J N 0 4'O W +� W N C W /a N � - y G �+i0 m > w N C N c c C y = E
W E If g m m N T V n N W W O d m N W .al- S �� A W W 2 A . C) N A m
(q c L �. E L a a.N. c m L Y m t a E �i L L`I' . v c . L Y m •- a 'Fj
m v�it� ami o� 'o �E cCD W
m a�cx mt � �cc Q m mmg `o 3 W
o c yQ $ .nm mmLao ai to cL - = cpcc m8 n. W W'ooc� > CL �i ��WcoowIL
m
a� n C cm n{�S 0 x cr m 019 rr m a. m coLL (y'�j) E W me >.� � e �
E d C 11 I--• O E N L W m W N a E OJ W 'C O m a 'C N W U W d 1- a C a = co N W O
rcae W mw
m 2 c rn rn
w � E E2
m
ami � P a a a a�
L II O N N
w C to u m co m K \
co CPO
/—SL
C �j C m +� N
C
1: m -te
Q� CL C
M
C r-y N e
m V
> ao aci
W rn m c
c m m m
0 E
C E U Q 1O c
n 8
of d
CL N- C m N
CD
m �p p m m
CL 11 CL
CL
MO x.00 H E m.
c —
li
m¢ of° E `a� � .
m� QV mvd
8
ca
O d c c
E-
�, E
N O II Y Y y
d C C C
oa > > M
om
C U
U C?
E c a n n
> m m m cL N m
w a L s s
c E'� ma cv m p av a m 'o
O m70 a E c`?c N d m N aQ v d a N �? c m a N
cmc � 8 � 08 mm 8 �e � 8eoc'�
U U"� D = m a LL m N Mn cn N y
m 11 m m C.�� m m (n ,c N m C M m
E U i� C%iI mea �� co 10 cid E �
�a E o 0 0
3 > wv 2 oX "
v m m YS �. E m c`3 9 dl
a� mn aaaama aaamn
m E mm m �8 mmm mom$ mm m �9
U Q
9m E 11 UE
E U It E
UN N N
c O. C, is w } ! Y
E m
x
r O
C J J
C. T = CO NS J UI C
_►- G J �¢ D O O
11W C
J 4J E
Y m C •m.. m C
lO m E c E m E `o' m� m c mL' •Z m no m E 'Lm' a 3�g
E m E i m � € o 5 o"i y o m m °� o� y o f ai c (D cc m 0v E
.•C m ter' Z c Oy ; N a C m O m m m 0 C "
ca 2c y .2 m � m �� ,o E m "c m � '�i 'a E m c m c° E m
Em o � o 'ovc ' mob _$ � cc 0)im c2 � 8 o € .m n77'p' � i
'C m 2 o c Q o m Al c c m o. o.Q c. al b m m G m b c m m
t w e m �°r'E m 'tS c o o. m a y 'lO Y N N n 8 Cp „'a ,a `r m c n c v
CQ C L C. P '4 -M ,-L m 3 - n L l0 C C =-c m m U C C G (Y(pp S 8 c m C
rn ll A m m
CCU OtJ (a .O m U- m ,.m., 0 m •F+�- -C'. m r O :C m Ci O E m
w y EW o o c Ear c `� c ` nct M —0 8E10 CL t) c m m
xm m m W co� ami c Y c 6 m o l�qp 3 D m d a %m m (cp v� v c ma =�S
J y N 0"d� m Y{ �m 3 L COD � �m C N � c c O1 0 'C ..�.. m B G y
Lu E ag mgn+ �, C> wOm 22 m _ on� � mm� mMm '� � m
*i C = I E = d COL m i9 N L W m m U L 'C H m c . �y C
Zion — � Eccm � c3c •Eoo '�' Qc � Y 'Yioom .6 = o
Q fn .m ,C O O"_ l0 m n O m w $ .-mom y .y.�. IC N T W y .m.,C .... �j m l0 L Of
D C7 c S 06 a —, i o CD CL ZS7 cm,W.'"Q tm n m iPe-s3 8 c
Ea n uS m m Xcr m yc m cc 25 alL° Ecmm �o
ca to m m N .0 wma ocv m b — cc m. 8
tIrU IJJ
6 N g
C _ =
aoW E .- =o
ts m �
N m CL a a� M
n m - - - o
�x
E z 1x1 m� ma3 moa
-s3
ATrACHMMT I
a
= cam
_ c � m
LL
mm CL 15 C C L N Q
Mo C
W C
Si ts
a 'ff
p mo_ c
CL 0a 19 8
EQv
Om m' y Qi C
cm �,� a 2 i.
vC p m G N p
E S
W C m N
41 C
O a O O..Z m m
�� CIS m •S
� CDMo L
3 co o Q
32 .0 E c c c
w m 11
v as c c c
oa
o
tC U
E d li CD 'n m a? m
CL n n
c E Q m Ea m a Ea m a Ea
EE �� $ CD CL C?ma c C c > co CD Sa c�
aac wz a ( Cc -0 aaa
CIS 1 I NM CL E5 0 m m C ) m m = 0 m m CO C j m
c cd � � � XI
El o N �4 ` E � O � vN E2 O
r m 0 � � � c MMS- c � �� c
—y m :s gg � m mem o m Y3 m �� Q m Y�
9 p m aaa c m n aaa c m 'n aaa E m n
E � Emmmmm �8 mmmmmmm�S
o v to
m
It
m 2 v E
U
� C IM
d �
c a
r. O '6
=O Q J J J
Ec N I=Q' vS ui C
-
6PIS J Q O
II m c
-r x ') m c N E
E-
=
o m Q c m m a 5 c E -� E c w, a c c m o c
E Eco L � cco ca� WE € 0u Wt4 � cmrnwLoan
€ �- E v E o c o °J N E cc E m o�$i � yZ � ._ c m - ci om `aR
°? m o m c N rr � � ca m y cv' mv `o tf5 m U �' me m
r E.= Y -2 o LD -2 •- `� - 2i oc � Ev c c m SY 3m
t mrne m e� � .3 o o � am �' 3 m mYP cc c of Oa cap m H w Q8 c cc
CD c� c� o� E -tv tt fO N 2 = m scQ r m $ c Cc
m e m c $gym i5 w c 2, 2 L '� 3 � c m c � c m
vJ ° mm - 0mEcZEQ - a moQC = ma � spa vm
H �_ o v io \ 49cv� occE
W fn E K $D Sc m O C..�U. ?� Q •O 2 w n= C V E O -S C C n= Cc L w _ C l9
cr $ c° c w nE � C a c co o m o _N m m c
cc
cccm'- cc � mr E � Qcc -= mica) : a13: 0 a
� E cn-9Q W o m Drs E m mom9 W' {{pp m E-N �, °' � nnH cO pE� � € o mc' cl
W C L i E.E w m E '�- E i E L E t9 N 'c m m (J L '.' Cc 6 V ? N C
L "" �m t�y m CO (a � L m N D OAC 'O cr- w N G C n m =
� � ggQQY3 -aw ? -a c � 'Q .0 CD QNaaicv $ a3
op �'b aFSm � m � Lmccmccvotimcc �' mm � CD cd cvm�' n > > cc �� c
E� �It m L E p e c e o e�� c °' E W'o x c� m c L L E 8 m
d J FE � .- m G�. ._ .2 G•c � l0 � O ._ N L 0 m N N G AO m h� a ._ O)N •O o C J
U c
_ Aw
¢m � c
N m E E 0 1 0
J
S m'
in
n O1 CC
C/3 11
MM m-� OOm C
AFACHMEW I
U =
C
(0,) CL > C IN
C
� •o
LU
> d o m
E m m :?
p m c
n
CL CL �n2
7 c= N m m N
NLam m m nCIL 11 CL 2 C
m m
0 CLCL CD v
v epEF �
C III
m — N
LL 'H c $ tI) C
O O m •N S
mcc U m « CD
2
cc I E o 3 3 3
m as c c c c
m z Oil
O Y3
it
m w U U w
E a c0 aoC &
i cri ui 3 th CD
N y y
2 E 55
c E m p c m a m. a`� m y .Q
cE � s > cN � � $ asi = N c •� = N �� $ m � N
y o ci 0 23
ma.CQN aaCc� CD
cW � U) 3OCc -0 -0
m co mm = m m
EL rE ' .o �
E �NN qN msN
� qN E � rO
o a m.s � m c m c � � � . m 8 � � 2 . m e ami Y!
o m as 22 a! aaa a '�a
Q E c E mm (D comm 4) comm 0 �W s comm 0)
CD E
m
n
m y U 0 E
I
g ca ca n= Y � } }
E m
z �
c as
C J J J J
E a c =Q' vi vi vi vi
n g c
J (q �
Yi CD cc
c > -__ c N E vi c
1O Iii 2 Ea r m c E •0 m d y c E c E € `O ioy c E m
E E = a) w 0 c m r 2 c c L m " n.N r >m � c m o � m m 2
> > L '0 m . M ..+ m y 7 m H 'O m .1. . m =9 y y -9 C N m of
m� 0 W CL0 'Cu--i c " c me N .- � ma m m � i° N Z o v � 'o �i m �E CD cu ' m �cai ami S
o aE x € � N �,2 � n a E E S '`3 i y m F' S € o c c 5 m "�y 0 CL C:,
•= Of' c ca Y l0 NC m E c O '.' �, m 3 m m - E m 13 = O r 2 > w Yp w N y m
cn c'c c .x-.G Cpp S L m c - m s= v rr !a N 2 c c' `° ti._E 'm 3 .9 a2 c � c m o
H m m C .m- m U C m 3 l0 =. 9 m tS c N ._ G `�
O '— c o mm m E � c 1O - v c m a?0 M = 'Oss m m m E '3 Q� Ca
z CO W nv m cc cS n> � � m oa r �' m � naw v c E L c'- CL m ai5 ccs
W En cc �mcmac 'o n >, o
x N m c N c mm2 �EpL 3 c i 'S m w e m g a� m { a m m m� v
W m co m o v c o o m " c c m E 2 'c •- c $ $ o
yJj E cocx m €gym $ � �.c m € � E E m � ID co m �', a� t o• �. y m m € m aNi E
g
CD
C•cWmc � m � Lt � c >vc an� L Esaa� � °7 'o cc
v>t4 oo c omommmm Nt'iop of = c i-a Nc �
.c .' •a m _ ca N `�L m m .g "O O'— m m O.O m .c S a= N
m n2 $ cN ,y, � cc -a Nm �aoycc2 m02�
+ O S 1/3 n2fs - a m25 m 0 2 m 2
cc a m$ CD 'm ami m 2 '- 'NE °' m '- v m nf3ma' o � � m min > > c
Ea - �8 � v E W a m � ts � E a0 CIL mg :6.g wr m m cc F- a E 2rnmmv'
as So E Eo ZN _coo
L U m 2 2 2 2 M
11 !E m
E Co 0) m
.Nrn m
I-SS
h
b
m m
ATTACHMENT 3
o 0
W 1 N O m
E m m
C 09
e m c
oti n y
mrna
7 C= CD
m N
y m ani aci aEi acft c
�6onm >m
130-
LL •c9 vi c 3
p o cc N m
s
ma U my
c m
3 c
O C
c E
m- F3
32 mG E Q -O O O O
41
0 {C V= {G 1C
E a co m ch m 4 m "' m
N N h 0-
2 E
2E w a s a w a s
C E> m L c to m L c -p m a7 C .0 m a c
w mEaE cT� ma2 �im � mawcl) �1 timay cimc3maW
8 > .co 8 >.o 82 E 8 o z�
m - a h
E U m mN c-�� m m m s m m ' rn9 m m U =° rn
U iri :E m is 'c m r c m _ oo c.- m
mo U m •- a m •- a m -- m •- c
C E Ca NNEMo � �' NEMc NcQNEgo � NE � o
0 > hU � ,� " EX -y QX
'CaO me CD
as c m n aaa c (D Q. aaa m 'o. aaa cmcx
MM -
a to 0
6 E mm CD mmm 0) mmm (D mmm CD
Li r
m ° v E
cm
U p-
U N (D N H
d 1O a- Y } } }
E m
Ir
a 4D G Q J J J J
dO. � cN= m m !n m
E P G J -off-a D D D
II trO c
m
J Em _ C >1
cm
m lmi 2 E 12 a 3 s-. S mLn c c 2 :c-mi �c E mLn E € c m m E �. .2 c
E ch m E •y v L m a_�i b y ` a�i c- >•�° o. �+ o .yam m.'g �? g ami s > > cm o
€ ma em� -ma. mm v > m �� vm mmm 0� mNmmmcmami
E_ - E n a m = € •e c. m o. m •ami ,� 0 € 'o v o p -0 c g E.'m m m`
G CD
G cQ 7 m L a m +m�..r .=. m. CO 3 ' e w l0 a•..' � 0 Z c a m m ar' m 8•
h c c c`` _c' m c c m � e v t 1D is a 3 c i° :D a •m 3 -�v c E'-c. Q`a3
W u '° m � 0:5 cm 0 o m m • m v� a m o y m o 'p c m a c m o m acm
�Z to �� nv m E ca n'a m c c `" E mL. v o 'Q = ¢ a. oma c c
'E a c t = c 23 c o-g d. c c �. n o c1-:5 m o w e c n e t mrn•- a
co m €'c mo- m Q m E c m � � m m 3 0 cm E m € a 45 m +t m m c y € m y
W E II g m a,, 0. �+ m m m N m Sc.-. 6 m m m m v7 ?. d d W lQ m m m .�
�. �"i � c L C•c . 2 E t .0 E.-9 E: F a v •m7"i y m t E.t n n.2.0 4D m t y c
co m cs a m a'i a y � Ry� 9 m cco n � � .yt E o 'c m ccy a� a"itsc 8 $
c 8� ea' nQ� ehvo Fi �� aHw 8ti 'c*m ey. yG �' a �
mG me CD CL0 � mv, dm 'vcm � 1° ma13m � mam � a�T � mrn
�� n 8u'S m E m m L° Q . a c '3 d e a' �' E my X c� a' E o c
ns � m l—c `o ._ m ci. z '� m y 3 a ._ 0 m m m cc rnm 8
ac ae a 'm W
qm E ,E =c9 =cQi =cv -'cry.
c
- 5 U O
�r
ATTACHMMn
NCO cHm � � c N
�L c� mv
anW a`�i c aci m � d
m m..EmQ cwtm $ SE0
v S a •r3 m Z,•3 $ Em9
CL o = m 0 ,6
v m o
LU
_oa mtyamar m� Qcm
xS Um -
v U 'm^m >, c � Ev N S
C0 m G m C m G q G 3
CL Baa mcm8 `�" a om' � m
= rACc
H @ m m c c m E n a 8 0
W O '� > m m 'o > din H E E c
co n' 1 n G N •p d adv ... 8 a d G
oO mE� w mE > ma) Ec � � ac
rn iii _ � c E
� orinc3aon � E
'D am aUEwe
m m a
c
•� N
3' C E OO C C L
O
m :. �a
€
90EO) :-;z o
w «• .o n Y m rn m
—
11
o ..
D o � O _ m m a`� .c o •mac
W In "' y C E. i.
m a W C r C N H r N 'O1 4) O m ..-. d C O a
yc w Cld o EW M $ a- = 8 ZUa) Is= 2 c3EL $ Q
EL_ N
En.9 a w H nm o � v� mc a� c $ � � � mn� $ GL L" y
a m a`� c y p _ ESU € { 8 P n - m E m • ; Q
o E Q 3 m m m 3m �, E a Q o c '�v 3w E�Q. cL 'n€ c'€ m
°7 � dw o o ac' rncma� m >
m c E COc .� c y== c '> n Q.v y w 2 m c m mQ a `'0-- a Wv n.- m
t W $ m A N = 8 m CIC m = m ? 'z L N rJ £ @ U o mto
C
U'm a �— rn- iq i� •c a $ L c y .`-a c °: H c Q o °� co ovc5i'�- `o
c26m cam cc amm �' mcm iic .2E2m vo c
= E ca NN 07 a o m `° Na cm Ln o)t c) o� $ i o m = fid m4 0
E o g E t m e ??a c c g v c rAg c c a
r mV � m cX "y gccy Qc>, m"- Qm '- v "¢ c and $ �i TiWa d
is A m l � M 2 m U a N C C C W n= M = m U.a O.J.0 .26 a) m G i aCL
o `-° om aa � a� n a m 'cc m `w° rnc ma cm1OmmEaicaQmm = mE
a E E mm o� �s m a 4) a oQw � m �'• Lama ZZ nn-S m 8a 8
10
r
at EE
1 La U g_
Im
a U
N N N N
g c m >
.6,;:5m > }
E
o m
�Q J
CL
7 CO R a m m J J
ca K
Ka J CC�11. ._ La _ U
n m c
J
E
m m E c a� m E y v a� M 1, '$rn o c.
E W" E r a0�'i a Q a Z W n c� � o v ' w
ts 3 o m 5
m= degoamm v E acidZ"La 8cY3
ca mc o m m E ca ar c
Q'� .o m o c c v E m �
CO c z E cc
c ; E g� d ... a $ oCc E LD a
F 11 1° :: o h m m m EmCL > E E a) E r c cv LD $
LU RER nz co
9 L mm H :_ c m d
W �' b� 'a h mrn S E m E E mm We 'r z5 E � m
J E to m -{{ca� me - La' ==( UaUA o79 9 c = mem
�1 = m ® O CL CL
06= m C�p y a) m
W a) U y� CCc
WO c coo n mom. o' 3o
C n�m '= ' gym
''J m n�Cc cp. m oc o m = m E oQ 5$t m
SSIOE
m� aE u, C7 > £
acm m
Cc UJ
=' � E E
i U b m
_Em a a a a r
a H a O
Ew� I C m o°Di a._ CL PL M O
/-s 7
� p N
m a � cc cam
C m SO -awl
wo '}mq
m
> d
W -0 m a L $V
> 0E "' m
c p
C L° h
CL w �c 8 y H aci
a m
y m a L Q o d - E
m d t ' d W `p Q
crn o a Cc a 0 m c
v O L� m _pCD
LL O L
Oa ppm 'n mQ � ' in
m C CLC C C
m� E h
3 0 Q c c
R—
CL
cc
v mrn E a
c c
a. o n rn rn
� �a c c
O Q
u
O
CD
O m m m y r ' m
O
.ro $ v a m ra
a mc —'^ a o m n 2 m my- fp c c m `o
> m c'c o nv n c w - v �' = M m 5 w m `m o
G� m Cc ami C13 = 0) m O C -� C IO ' � j L N'mpU- 0 O
v E Q Q $ we c w m m ' m >,¢ 'p y o n 8 3 v a
m
F- E v m E m o m e n _w a m c e -p m .mp. O.
m min c c CL yv > > � m � p w � �
L .E J m 8 O m U to O. N E C m ` O m
m L m ) m O m C 'mp $ cm m m `' m ¢ 3 .a LL m 02 fn a s
p .t-. O) tt m wm, w O C
c O� E �-m m o m c °� 'D mp -o cX n0E E
c m w - E rn c - m � n. m m
a a mV g mncE � E`octl Hca= =Fa 8E8a—Eio.20 � a
'O O m m fn N p Ep p) m Q C Q C 2 C U �L Cc N m Q L
Q E C E m •> m U m G O ._ G O O N m m ._ U f6 v m U U
m � U E
as U t .
_WCM U
E
C
l9 m R a 1¢
tL 4 C = J J
EHG as o
u �c
J fn E
C > >
O
Ega °� Q 3E m
Ez damic �'
Clot E d m m > c m LD
m� mt c E E 0— E m c3
mW r'nEms— Em— ws
E= a -E a
L m C H y p c ,t� m e p
N �'�aC O1 syr C C y m— H'0 Cc
G
F II C O O 0 L U 4D = E
2 co E- 'gy p
W - Q E c a 0 � .L-. O OR w
"LU L z
28 E � '� p > � 54 m
in ca CD Y rLY
W E G7 g a d m m 0 A U tL
Q � cc 2 $ c E $ 3 � m
ca
t m ca
Qo So � � E � � mm �
0 0
Ea Lb
E oa 2 wEaQw ccE
C m mcx
W W
N a E E 0 J =tai = cyi
cp g. ¢ a 'n
+■ � m o
en
0
'n L W �... y C •. N la m N
CO3 $ cc '=o cma
a g � N OtSv � E fO FS
m crn fcmm � oca G� mEQNgiaaacia^Ei
0 o L 3o c W 0 y W "�� 23
O W W $
_ •C ,.� ' O ... Cj C C N
CL
CL m= �m oToi § m y3 EB a' a n
X E O
o t
211 06
r wo
cc
.QL
rn qqS W m` p C Omm q c mC Qaa « - aNN Ov2
m cS N to
p AiCO H3
-COD m 2'i m ?
U- 'nc 2 1452 � > p > � yq; gicg�' er E
c m € .
m cr N ` c u«i N m p c o a H
0 E IN, COD 8 ami A L S Ec E L c. QM)
c
0
COW da
« E< c c c c HE
me• ou � - oi rn a LM
�'. y Q 'H 'y 'N w 'N
w d C C c m C
a
p m
c Q co € m N c
E d O G'- d E
m m C N N
O N m
g � � 2CL oNm = Q
W � EE vyv
m m U al
U U C m m W Q�' O d
m n 0- -Z m c c E `m
c E a; � c
oil o �a � o N m o
> y V CO H N c C •c fA W m m m
v W om a BE � at $ ca 0 0
Q E E U > m co N5 'S o- LZ Z Z
« U s
N
E11
U U E
Im
� � yy
« O U V a O m N d
C d. W
CD M
c
CL o. cm
c m=a J !n to to (A
J (A
m
X m C m C m
Emcx
EE p .N c ami Ec Eo ca
C_ mE {c(� �p , map
•C 1 m Cl c
O 'C > C C c W 'm0 O` cc
x, c 'C ''.i m � c 9 O Jp 00 :� m N 5 rn
E_ H m p Z3 m o
z W atm ` m m E a s E m s Cos me
H 3 �� ecm. � Hm wm 25 .•aa `a tS CD W � cm0 .
UJI Li Ex gWm n� •E v CL
E EmyWorn EEpwa' o
m
w m � cm �rm 'E mme cXc L >
J lG co p O > •� m '0 N' m m
LU E CD $ m o { E E � E E H > E `o L° > nac cm
me 0 vc n LpNm cc ccsoi '0LL (a
�-' �� =i12 `� � v � - �pyLcmo Fac2Emc
C7 C H o bN y 8 9 4 E c o m C E SL C. N •e
dS p c 23 '
CL ii c = c w p E p c E p N p a N N
a _ c 1 V N m E '�0 co a L O d Nem.• d cc 'D d L N N o v
!E 1: EL m
T' a 5n
it
ATTRCHME I
-
= mm v m
0)-6 o
CD
c c
= � mO � M>C1 c $ � Nai
c
coo
N1 wcis Oc -0 � CE
m >
ca
y m2v yo f 20
� E � o € $ � S E
E e wGC) n om m
..
c
CD
LU c c Ra L € o Q fQ vi y maCL
m n O o m o. E � aami = � --
�E 0 3r E m nm w c� �' =pv �-n a d - vmi m m $ 25 _ 3 m
`� E '-0 m 0 c o W m 8 c > a m > `m 0) c `� E W m
o = ma 's m 'g ... c 1O v mi� � $ $ cnEcLa�i
CL �a cc $ $ o Z acEa o m vRo- P Ew ; Wa
df E E m E W ` -� 4 aBi E €'a_ N o fT m y E C N U z N
m c!
E `3a) ar cD m E w 0c =
w �6 °� m � �$ c E o m cm W o. E c m � S E o f = .0 m
C d f1 '� N '0 EL .ate. m = y m p�p�� y y is 0 O+= w cCD m m >. E ayEi ami voi
v kF0 c o `° nm . cr
CL
cc a m o . c € E Z q m o ` m Cr m ny
U. He �2 EE � cw 0 CD CD
c.>ic,Nic= � aaa `-P 'Q-
•� Lam+ O m j G 0 G d C C C n V n N m D d C h N = j n a3i
WQ w E w Q �. E mm ac E m o c� $ m or mm = 's
m� 0 �' N > naE E $ E Na m a E CL � . v 5 nN c � m E
C w
3 c O o
m d a
•o n¢
m4D o n rn cm 0) rn m CD o0
m a c
0g
o _
Ea o =m y .
c
CD cm
mn m 1° (D
c E > o CD m
02 ma c � m
o E o C £
= LE O ca E
ca - w
m U W d" m y
cl U EPs'
E
p c�_
v mu c c c c c CIA 2 ODw
0 0 0 0 0 a � " � = a
a Z Z Z Z Z > � s >
Uc >
W Q
d Ecc 11 U E
m t U o
= (D o c E W Ua m m `2 awi m
g - d n= Y
E m
�.mm
A
W co ccs¢
E T 7 c0 N¢ J fA
_ FSC J a ..
II W c
m
W mQ owwc E 'E E = E E CD '0 o
EmE � 3cao = - m ymom � � ,CLm = S" � w � 2
O) c W U M m 'O rn-•.�- a v rn(0 C 0) m m U r m of C cte
E C E N -S E C c S B c c S m y > y 'C a AH = m
,Gm am m • a • ? a m ' a �p c
W W um G yy p t/l p mt W m y C) Pm 7 C d
cc
p •C m N ` S d .m. E f�..i d W '� •m w W n
W W 2 m a s Of• �° l0 m N O• m y c=i W
:2 � > Co 25 = m NG �am = opw Ey
2 to 2 cxV rnv G ?'m m c-0 X a �v 2.9 m > j y Z m
LU E= E ma E = c E m � E E E E m ` t y g o� E� Tc
LU LU K m w O O !a '- c m o y •m c O m c 0 N"> M o CO L�' -0 °1L' 3ms �L' o WES 20 LO =0
cm � o� � m �
W E nE mr,� ` mcaE m> ... o .0 (D
'0
mmmmm mom
m � wm' mcornm m `--� E0 �m1-5-- H �m =1h ca 0) a) >. W o � 10
m�S 'vuiiyacc mca macs M > ca 4) = w m 0
0U' c gY! av 10 ma y am m 'N "0) `m mam_ m c y ca pc a 2 $
CL 11 m O m a 7 E m tail E C ? _y .m=.. JL 7 E Y j 0 G j 8
Ea - �uS 5 PEM 0 Z o o x o E 3 0 = z5 € Q va; � m 47 o c 'c Ami
o 'S ® ma > E mn. 2 .s5 m as � a .2 m a ca :5
wft LU
s tai W
[7� C7�
L N g rn� h� cn ' �� M
�y O O
11 r m> o
w C rn u� m t� m a \.
ECD
O
_ ,r
ATTACHMENT 3
m m e v c rn v o m c o W m a c `W N m
B -y s W > N Ev � o mr' � v c W EIEv 1'n �
r Cu
j 'S `' `v rnn E E W v N > c c m —
�L m 5 .:oco— E Wsccado .- mm ^.
a � mc �co m �— a> E3oci � cm � m � � o' cc
> i � a m m W N LD y c m mar Ei ami `— . 8 W w a o
W c c�gE: WEU a ?� .� pW� ccc o m � cg' c�i .0 3 m 5 Wrnm
> O'E ca 'P iS W c o i5 a'o m N cm N Q m cc m W o•.=_ v
C n cLu E � W -- w e W L a .E a n c2 c" c 9 V c y
CL cl
ma S m � W n c o W n �' 13 Nva Q m m m =cn v E ca. cO m n
m n m n W 8 W
N p m E of a °Ji c -2:. 30: � m m o fO N E � y Q Q w E
W II 1� C Q E= a = C W 7 N W Of a O W 0 T'O x O > C .O n > U !O
C 0 o -m- d r`J N ' h y c:'rJ' d C c C W cca •O C CL ch L G C H
Q �O 0) m no o a m m W = 'non 8 E c o _E_ W S
C H W 5 ul Q N C 'Q c E W QI W W O.�. C m
U. oa � ? m �' c c v m o s` o E m �a �:a9cL ani w m Q m
W n� o W E N W $ = 'a I E 2 W � B S Q Q
5 n m c n3 5 1r3 tt- E N d n v Fc E W S E n•� W t 3 c U n'S aci L' `
c
c o c
Q C iL a
v Wof E a '•= w
c c c c c
m `bz u cm rn n rn .0
oa
v c
cW a E C o 13 Cp Ra m C € n N
m e T5 — � in .� m m
QE °Ltd W Q �>pmol'Sm5Y � cvE
Q N 7 — W W N O —
c E> CL-5; c c N Z m y r
c E •C m $ ta L o a� 3 CR
c x no S
c W j m ca o Ze .c W E m
_ W _m nr� WaU = 0. rr in W n_ c .^_I
coo it W ¢ c lc m Q t w E CL
W a y d c.
E E v cl E m c W iris�r $ � � aWi `° cq r S 3 E
3 m mo � cH � No � �i � `pGo �itim � � Nico
0 W N m V. W m C C C d C 8'9
o
ca � m mP *QE = �O o1L W � o a � >
Q E m > •Q N .rJ n n > G. Q M n m n c > Z > n c m
v V t Q>
W E
Im tm
c U O
} } }
E W
_ C
O. O.L' C = J J U) J
E H G J a s J O d P
II W C
W
J Y E m 2 6 E
CMI E Q � v m m vise W ca M c � = m
m g 8 c E m = aci m o , o - O.Z.. �m
CE y E c 20 � a .E .� E E £ yo � J Q a rOii
C m C-m cm 2 CL g C 8 E m CO CC��'1
0 a C l7 W W y N W 8 Q..S W � W C m C
C r
o E x N W d O t.. mL.s p m}ut c cc o M m.a Q
c c � ca ca t E c `v rn � d � EUS S 'S o CO 6c•o
W
11 _ cE aL v R L R c 'a �0) w , my W v v W n fO E y
LU E ti _ . CL 0 CD W
E E Q)c -F- > cCa= to nc o E c c E `
� Ln W c m i� °l a W j$ca W CD co t i E r7i cL' Ln —
w E 1 mom �' E O1 W W c La 'cZ > B E o cm CE
Is C9 pCC c v -po n�y rn t _W 0- 8- s o p Wa v $� aci W
yU `° o '°� �: dj � v fO c c = o S y3 fn W j i° W m
n0 11 W X m C C m r W O ¢1 C m 7 j (> N W y W 8 . W L�
Ce W ._ 7 N A N a J2 = d m m N 6 U
� a �� ca
a8W E c �'
¢ft Wcm
�w
ao � E
s g
�m w� a' o
0
Z ux cr 0-
E . �i K x K
ATTACHMENT 3
C
Has
N y O
c y w m vi _ 'sou a m v a0i 3
2 -F§iCL E m " nc o m N v $ $ E �
9 N c c r Ey.c E u;
EL= W
C.
> 'E n= o•.cv �' > m E E ma 'p� c E
R m « -�- d C!' '- .-. m C G p l4 m �-
0 o p N 8p ? $ •� € Baa cv N
CL o2
co c m � n y € 4)m aEi c c s E � E3a oN
��m m E m1 >§! 2 8
N mi $ oq > ami m n=c v=i
C d L G N d p `tli C o''> N E C � ,fL3 d
'O m > �- $ :� -per m
` ODS ��! E E m io m w v v m EL E N c 3 m
tL. 2.
m o rn 0 - O b ro m 2 2 N V m 0.c �$ fV O
y y m •= m N N m 2 .p�. •- d
N ay 0 0.> m O. U c 8 8 = L .0 m m $ N m C
O
10
E— 8 E
'p m
m + o u m cmrn cm cm
C3
c.2
E4
> m
2 E
nm
c
0 E 2
m c E
c-
_
0-
CIS
-
m n m
C CL E �•')W n A
m oV
cc 0 CD
y
C
Q E c E > a a a z
15 L)
m
II
to U U E
f.l U N N N N N
� Sa cc n= } } } } }
E m
u oQ U
G p, ' C ry= J J J J y
EPG J a¢ v o 0 0 0
II :S C
m _
v c E EEp c� E q. Eo _ ^$ O
m _ _ - a o m -
j O O -1 L = F N U N C
O) N
mrE a) p N S mN o' c �' U) W yCo S c a � •> 'v E
c m $ • v c°� a •O L 3 .. .EL 2 c N � 7 w
.m. m a v c K c v m c �° vmi v m �: L v m -O.LA m c u P.
r E 75 -5.
o' QEa; m oQmL oLmc gi� 1O � N.
oc �� � nc 3d nfO 30 m 3a.$ $ m
ca c
y y R•m m n2 N $ nm c N m $ N - $ 5 E > ,-
H a �ppi o m ^' N 25 •am 3 �G�pp .am o E'i W N - mp�• Q
Z fn p, m 0 lC O 'p ca g G m rLi- G to 7 C > m o N cc U
LU - _ ;E m = CL U4) Ew yE moE > H
w " mo °a; _ c mom _ p mo � � mo `7Em �° � ` .
J E to_ L° o c L c c m a. y La c a �2 L° c - N y oy m y
W m m . •5) = B m O .- OH -0 C. tl) - C O
(I„19 A S C C m > C C m N m j ' y m O 0 -
0
E'i � p�p p 0LLm v77mm � Lo � $ '> i � v $7pr21° a $ - cpm
4
co U O m (i C � w y m U > m w m Q? m m b C N L m p > of
OC a $ $ a E �p pp o m N E 'a m m 'c a �. c
C! $ - c $ $ 2S C p to fn c _ a c o a `� vi p cCL 11 w mLU
73 -9 v o
E a• - d W O m O >� m L O m 7 4D 96 0 w A m O m N O m I-- ..� L S
o n ova a c) d� va m Sn 5v E $ a $y o 8f-` N S 8 'v
am �W
= m E
N a a
� II
L d K N 4
O
o
ATROHMENT
r m p£ C v
'�' N .�C C = = p m m m •j
= N, m no rnm ai a' n c $ w E m
w a
e .9
c = m
m oiE o N '> E E� �EM
' er W.rnv
. c - E
CL 0=
%
CL =(L
`� € m 1, $ E a t ami y
CL
7 c -ya: �.. EO �sE.� EN3w'
` Q m m O > m — m C _
C O d N y C C > cc 10 O O C E..0 m
c c m y '� d E a E N = 3 �°
LL .®C m • 2 7 N L d C c nj O
75 7 — Q
Om E . L pN p N d E S p C C.d o
-rn On
G d
3 = o Q C C C C
CCL
m
v _co Ea
e e e
m z,
(L c c c c
0 N
m C
m a ' O
> aci t5 N
L E Q m
G> U
c E Q m m 3
W c E �.-S m M y
$- > oL � �
t `- w ¢
cc
Cc it w 0
A E CL U ` CL N >. N N
c �a � Ev � N
U
Qcc
= mE d > n am a d
€ >
U c e
m E if c� E
cc E UCD cc
ay
U N N
CL m .n= } 2 } Z
E
c ()
6O. to
EFC J as c v o 0
o c
J !A m
" > O) c m =
C C m a O O U E C .0
E mE w m v2E � E 'mvim w cc m $ " p fOm
m m � "cc mm vmtm mmdc, 0000 . cm .2:-
M
€ m t5 co O) N p c y g i a c $ m E �° $ E m _'S � o
E m o m E a a=i S E ui o E 0 o CO N m a N a � C V N d
r mx ng ogg aE cc
m CD
t m m $pp �' E m m m p�5 E ;g m m m2L- m $ > c=i m
pl N N y > V n�p 7 > > E •.—_-+. O N y p m m U C N '$p N E > � $'= O
F g_ to p i' N o m = c c* > m o = '� N o $ c y3 m N m m 3
g gx E m c cc o f E � a .za E m m c; oma: o f o m E E
LU m E E o c , - m g N wZ3 m Q��!cm m - a my = n $ m
W E U d a E " �u o m a E � m e 2 E y E nE c° - cm
Z
mg -
m m E = Z5 p E my - = c tc >.
m cnC� > caa m o c F E ' > E $ .r5 c oa ._ $ m cam
G N 'y m C 9 C N $ m N N �nq m Cr 9 l0
DC7 c �:3 WmacmCc c c ?d� ooEmc m 95 ID co > £ ,X � y = c
CL ,i m e m E °' a`) $ € E m o�a 'E c Z3 m &-frte o m m E o 3 c m a
N ,� � > mc oo zg
.9 n. = FE
Na =m Enos m
U N IL
m m r
O
in W E
' m m
W.
i U N
`7 a a a a M
O F > O
II N w a Ix
L tK W 2 > O
E
ATTACHMENT 3
e
o �
m m
z t cm � E m gc o
�L v M 'a mn E'Ei v maw m
o U c S � gE c N U o c w e nm
a
m
Mm
m IE mp Q w C •O C d (.l•�`- m L
E E -J 2 C c 'O � O � n O � G O) m .� C. � c m
O m � � c EE .n m �' E m c m o y p C.
aI=D
LS F
o c p E m c ._ ._ V m $ L N o 3 a aci m
U) L° > > cm € € � m m != Er m c ` g c y c
o *'a w `° �' y n rand 0 Q Sa° s F- a->i m c c w E a
I o�' `�° m L orci E Q 0-0 € 19 E E� '�$ o c
p c E c E E o g E w c ca y m > rn Q m $
al trS o r6 Cr3 v m a E 'o w a
LL m o cm i� 2 pmp a cc pmp E �e m cc d d _ c m
nE c� s s •S av ....'� a E al O m c
mg E c aci E aci aci a H E E �' E °��' a U A m m
-L° o
3 c 2 .
m -
3 m E a `c=4
'o n a 'c c c c •c 'c
m - o n : of of rn w rn rn
ma c c c c c c
- gym
m cE CL 'E
> w c E E p t Q c
a m cb n m E c c Na
e EE cLila) E25 mE
c E m Ic n
w � •� oacic cm
v- `oocEL� Ecm.
CL m g w d E E y E y m
Ev�. mm $ W .W
a CL
C' m
m no.� h y
W
m E II vE
U
cm Im_ U E
S a t26 2 Z 2 Z Z Z
E z� .
w O L6
c
CL CL co CO
C O •'mom' m 0 C O O m trail 'O
L.i W 2 m O C N et 12 a w O m 7 C
m m Q '�.+•
E " l'r a `o c 3 m h c ' a > m tc4
m " N O O } •p vi m 0 0 0 > U N C O m C pp C
C a y d 7 j coo J { Q m N O j J m y w .O C •C
_ a b.9 O
E W a N m m y p b' y E E c w m m E m t� w w Q w
m_ m C G f� m m �wO N .� f0 C n Ol w _ t5 _ m m " Ol
L m W r m 8 C g L cm2 U y $ C C N L m w w 3 a U C_
iNll c m {p �t�picm c E E g c
H t L 'i r A m W CD > m p tE9 ,b d m U C y N d V N •p0. m H
W U E= j: _ Ev c c c asci - Cc-0v >on. ycm aoi .`° -c p m m
E' trim }s 3 ca m m 8 m o' E 3 ca rn v v QL' cm
W h e o m c c c E m O m c E m �° fE m m
W E Nit o c o m _ > v 'S tc rn > E 5 E $ v o, mLn m m ui
�� i"Q cO mE� E �i ¢ a� S niO E i� na c co cq cv E E.
E v�c� ADZ'> �° ow owEz' > � ow Eccm m `o $ gym
DC7 c � � k.m� c � v � mm � cc � � rvErnm mm $ � c �U � ma�i
C6 II wLl m ncc La i g 'c 'nf5 nc E nElE .n c co qqll € �u
EK - y E m � E o Q o m wb E o m m 5 o t° 00 L' m
E w - a E i d ... � •Go E w - v 3 U n w U E-c -j C nS �
aR
mw
m _ _
w
L U >•
G ° > LL a J ¢ a a (L a c
R w N
II
m N 1�1, N th sr F Imo..
E r• S d' • rn to m C
/tet/
ATTACHMENT 3
Y
O O
.0 y L
N C
,{ 0 8a = S
> O ^. V m '5* 2:-.� C
.-
W d �.ti � � � m N o
c
> �, Ek, c � �C'lno
D
0 o 8 m - U a A
7y
an o,a
m- k^r cr m rn O
N Em i s r c U Imn
> ; o n
N 1 ..r N m .0I LUr O_
0 EL _.0 C
Ol"y Cp Q H C
00
0 V N •-.= O ..m..
CDa `^ � aEi •EU my
c m
co �aE
m-
cm EZ � a=
e z z. e
N'.. O 11¢ O) O) 0
m � y •tn fn -N N
Ym d C C C C
JI -
0 0 C C
m a
o m U - o
c Y• YE L CayC cc
o
2�
> c p Qc ER 0CL 8c
CL
U rL `Eo cc o Evo
ca E
75
U 'm m m OD= y aD m
V - •c w o c � c
m n V n. � Y •� �v E Q � $ o 0
m E U� nr � � 9 c � o m c
v a
cc
m -* � ; tW Oaa � m m =
C +'
m „
m
03 cI U a.
cIl
Uip i.:
r E L'a `, m d O O
a `° .gym �•: � � z z
E
c € as >
o
C r = cp < _=r' , 0) U Cn
m
[n Ecc
y
m m Q °' E cc
m E E m aD c 2
4 p pp
m C C N C C 25 c d N m
Em: my2 �p QCL W 0 C13
�' � a� a—moi
E
:' H C N -O = y m N C O)
O N emC Q O .- N m H C n C N
U) C L 4'�'.
CL=
O. f0 .- C- O p_.rpmp• ..���p 'C _m
II g m a h m V H C a W = C d V
co .. � t E D m m D E a
UA E � ani t ri 8. o_ � 'S m R m.� E
J m Sti m ? 'm -„mom. C 5 N co om
c •- s N c - CD =
LU E ` � mnc m m H 49 omt E = W$ � �E c
.. � v y $ acimc=.D - mom. €. o mmS �. m m = dmf
cDt9 c c� E � � E ca :0 E � E - - E E p my
m c ;.m m N m aD t `29i s m m °D ._ m m p $
E� n m CL R c �.ot ,� c $ p o•o
CL - _ $ — a N m - m 8 � E m — a _ o
ac ae m m
m A E I'D - 1� z z
m
: N Qom¢ro n Ja a o
m
e � i� a a a o
1
C m O Y 0 M
O
c o 2 v
V R , SO 96
ca o a -am,
N 0 a7 h
C C �� •�Uw cc 0m C _
y `o 'COIL
$ p
'C d :p J
> 1 a1 j d C.'� V C
W N m c >.W N o -:�' m o 0
m _rnE m L•c @ � U c tM
n € mCOC3 M
Oc- � $ ? a to
rN `c m
a
� m co2 � comrnc6Co. o> m p mC my-wC
on it 0a B.m v W
v m ym $ a
0mNcOtcamO
m 3 Nva m
cc
� cCw� = yc coa�i �nc
w¢ F o � M2rntnUo ¢ E aEi EU ma
3 o Q C C C
c d
v Cll E< E 8
c c c
M p 11 O) O) O)
It
0 m p m m N p
C.w •� > w Off. m
mo E cvi
E � .car.. a �. c fn .0 >.c 0.
� U Z` o c Co.
m `o �
c E> oaw R 0 aW .0 0i c aE c � am0 EO mtoo
t �
o mE mfbg co' occ m d9c momU
cE omY v o o'� o� c.y m m m Q c acOi CT
M g m m Z`c v m 2
c U c rn m > ; c Q C7. E o y c aa) y Q
CD V m a C v >, m y c ^-.o' m. c g Q. m �.� o c
a•Qoo oi
a m f oo vi N E
mat5 0 ETnQ2c mcc m
a E -0 c cc
m w EU3ieL
E � m nmBo
a¢
¢
o c >
U m try
U Q E II 1, E
o La
m o is U N
Via` m •n= z z Y
U
M
C
CL CL c Ixl m rn rn
PO m
6 m c
Y y N CM C F
CU C> as C
CL co E
11
E cn E g `o rn n> � S a o
m 0) Q'
c E Q c am a m
m mm v m E N N o c c
yo
O cm
N N ..N• p C 'O N
w c e Q t N of m= 'E 3 L E
y II m m a "" c Um � � a m
2 Cl) �K m �:mNm m m c ca .o.
W E 11 £ W E
i� 1O= ... N rnm a >.v CA
W FL �� o 4) c o o m m m o-
LU E
11 0 cm m
0
c
ym �{ mm2+r'i momcm E
C9 C C fix, m O W N N CM cm
d� II C W G m N C - �•Q 7 C
� a — Sit € � c E'a � v a 8
H E E.0 m a3i
= y
91 a
rn m ¢a — a o
O
o �, ¢ Iz
E
CO o a� c
1
A ITACHMENT3
c .mc p �
m C c V W
e $ N 5 c c -146,
a m E-v n ate„ ~ Wn
m > rn m W � � o W m E c �� E
rn•Z ... o a ` ai
or-
`z- Z C¢ a 'cW `m-rE = 2 -ago E 2 R � c`ofi m a c 8a
> a W = S W m c nc , N m - �0 3a o o W W oiCmc
LU
ca £t E C� m y o ai d m z o 1L- •W r t�i W ar n m. o
> mm E .' y c o pCp � � �= M 2i o $ ov N aOR m m CD C c.� o'
O -.}- c W ) U L � ' U Q y n N m W Q .J W W
c 0CL $ 2g a' cnm $ iE '� En �iL3E0E > 0 ' v � mmora�i
C E C M $ •r.J O C C JO 2 0 "W- $ C.ra .m.. c s W y
N W w W O
@ mm� i � $ � Z wE i� � 9 8 o o � n ai -6 ' o 0 5 }g '� 5s E (D
C `-' O ..0.-, C c > d t fF.=Ri c W ' c a C' c N O y 0 8 N a W Q j t
c CL t y o Q E_ $ W- m o o Q o c W c c ar m e nv
�0 2 o c a ma U c E €' or y; `ate 2 �i ; m �i o �° c c ami m E c,ci
ii -w c c° g m = M W a W e :a rn ` n $ t, rr m n Ea E a _rnmrnL •N m
po -, mE � or� Co 1z mmmnawanina; C coEcm2
my "' SIt Li EU rLir '� `� o !� $ o. c $ ave °' UBm EU SL
c W
10 �, a
N o I� rn rn � r( tm m or
m g Q .. .m .m .2)
3 0
0 3 O c - W
o d �f• W "u � � � ami � y o
c Q _ E 1 'o m > m 0 '€ 'C c > Y (a
Ea U Z y o. ar n' y $. mrn E W �? m W o
arc W � cWarO cU
n§! o 'o c c EL ur E 'ar H d2 E =0 coo
E N � o
c E > o c U 2 W a W ami �� � t a o v W 2 o. c E
M c �
Cl
r dQ � McC - .005 = > w0E > > mcLEW gm : o
� `� g � W $ c >CL
Q > � aimn,3m > o $ o3m 'UaEiacio
W = c > a m �v `m
W a U', d m E N A" .. C n.- a o o a T m a a � ® c n
p E c� � := m 3 $ C CL H m c �a cM m $
m oU W - N E aro arc c � " W
v m m � � E s L) $ rmWn E� E o aci -EU aci a`ra m � r%i ioU
v oW m 'm = ;,0 N3 `03 $ c :° dyamio � � w �iW
Q E c E Zai $ � W Z zI ,tn ° '¢S W o 8r
m 8 U U Q
m E U p icy'
CD U
c a W m 'i, } } } '� Z Z
W
E
n=
c y.
E CL fQ fn w m
11 W `
"'a x E
c W _ c c
W m '
m E --;.. c o E o r m m m o E o
rn•
ma ';?Gaoa n$ C0 10 2
n Nc � `allo aNm W W o
m= a) = .-
W= E �° E �_ �. Nam_ m E
t m e bs: C. N r W y O E m� m o m
Co C.L Q O cc
O -G '3 W a W "� E W •c $
CO) rl M- a m e U c, v E b e wW `D o c c m c E
m n m W o
Z N K +, m o m o N '- N s a c *§ n m
�' � � aE r c W
W W (B Ir o N O o > b O N y W CD a Ca W a E y m �7p �Np �.mm
W E 11 ,p OLJ� c o L c r C C a Q N c c U U N N
I . _
� C E $ m $ E E rb � $ � maE m c'
E y' acrar € m mE € m :0 ' llj' ENoc E .2 W Q
oC�7 c $ Ir E Eia Eo � S -_ o m cY E �O � yy 5m W
W -Z k•d W F. N W m t"'.'fq N U r> W W Y m W
CL a �a n- oc n'ooc �c m 10
w c
-
w ft W m W
m E G
s v m o
�c U N Jn. a� a - !gam o
us
tT Is r t .V:r N
E L C z �.O O o
ATTACHMENT 3
ail
c ym
cc$ �ai �Em r °
o � rnp E � 3p � ommmU nm m c ym n.bomc .m-
m 15 0 15 mmm
Y p L° n� a N m 2 nt m m o
p y E n E ... y E I m m o
CL mrna E L� E m Fi $ a m ov wayi � olm
c32 5 n
y 0 C OT d N ' O n
CD 0- l O)— L C O C C C y E m a O
C 0 .y E n p O.•.00. O y .O m n _CO tyb
C �o mat Q y d W 2 o L C O G F'i `a� N E y S
y y O.1C ;� = C n O a 7 C. O1 N.,�`._ G7
LL d (D cts EoayiE `m$ nyym �� EcmdE
$ o. c $ tea 2 Cg .9 to
CL
c
O
.3 c- c c
00
c d
m - E E
� � E
oa .rn rn of
CD m Qyy •y
-
O
Ea 3 �
m rnO G
v; 0) O
m c
> m c tai 0 �CC) 3r _c..5 y y
n} Cp it- .- m Q m m $ th
T+ m CL 2
E �L Cc O` E n C C �..
n
mE a=v 'LO mm CM U
t'-3 ai m o c G ry C Dc U
f0 U V Q p y na y g C 3 N
c £ c c E W m l9 m C
a m CD u m a c ,E � cr (u m U U
Q E m E :E E a E cc M eco Bir.E z co tU)
v U t
m
m E 11 v E
CO E U
U
� 5a `C' -F, i z z
E z�
:. oC3 4D
m °a
o Q'
O. CLE C = J J
70 Is m
11 m c
J rn y
Y
N C C .t.J m m
mm m Q O y
II J3 C p `m c
E h fi °� E (D o `p 0 8 y i> >
m E yy m 6 m e to •r3_0 c
m O- n N a d N p S 0 9
p mm _ �p 8 n m
= G m G Cy u U y C c
tL
0y U p0 Y
C
H N W m m Y m. y C O y
ts
to t tca ; E w E � mnmvmc_ 2mv
v5m .9 mE � aSEw m mcoc %mycE
W E Q •0 a) L +
CI w 75 cL 49
mmcg l a E- c c 8 o a c`p' b $
m 0=.QS C � ia � ovi
C7 C U Y3 �q m O m C m H n
Ebe CD c
� n mu'mfm e c �i � E m
CL _ so m � y oU m FLO m $ S- m n
O 'm W
C m � c
1.
mE Ego cap
s ts - - -
L 1 IMm vcn
5 m M
•e u - O
m O
O
,r
ATTACHMENT 3
t� �C�pp C'
:Q ^ � w T! O 'am;
Q Z.1 cc p C w 7
�L m m rn Z..moo- mom CL
E a c rn E o n 7
C a� apt � ' }gm 3 m Zui mmcm m 8x124
E t c o m o m $ a Elm o m =
i nc �Cm m = m 3g(p m o c m m m m 0)Ca) _ a�-sU c c m
m Ol '.' C.LU > O H fq m n E m �'0 CM C Q H na -6 A n o C m E C.
r o f n m cy m 2 n m m o s � my 8 `-' f° ID m
CL 4)
CL E r 3 a E > �° m y �� m V �
a m. $m o c m m $ a m 8 0 c > c E � a m o. n�
q L m 8 0 3 n-tai -S W e 8 *E,*r. nr m `o m H nE
co 11 O c cm n 2 EF m,� c y 8 y a > >2 -0 0 ___ o n i o o'er .�. ai
a p.0 mO. nmOnN O QW) am ` Oy � mh � 3 BNO.�7 = ONm
c c m m nc m m c o •G c � S c rnaEi � m. m nE •v' .`m �' E aEi
A
U- m o m ani m c. ami H n m E c-n 'W M'' m U m m a� W y m b E
�a me 3 y 8 2 o s o ani a"miY E Go o f cc
o Em y c o o� E
$ H o , nc -0 IS U . at� EH ._ t a nU m o ._
3 cc pQ c c c
d
v a
� a Ea = E
c c c
4M cm
pa
m m c c
and m ` > ai CD �
E� m a'cmc m • c _•s
Z _
m
G m d =w
(,) G tl f d p i m
co E Q 0 Q yca m °> 2 g c_o - o
mco -a
cE O �C3m � Qanc�- .o -Ua
iO a QU m y 'N m S E =n
m
U•W O nTE � m •- c m
m nm •-_
is U `�' S �f..o .c m m m E ca m
c c� �� :� L° nm m m Nm II--
0 j �U g y m H •0 U C M �' E G
'90 Cc pm O O 002ccw2cL wo82w(D :
Qc E CO U UU nm 0.9E nm muco
U W.c
m 2 U U E
cm 7 U m in
O` Q L'a o o m
rL 5:' m 'n= Z Z
E m
lr12
12
1. O m a6
C
cc 0
O.O. C m 2 J co J
U)
.9pigJ as O D
II m c
J cl m _
U C > 2 p U C
m m V .N OJ d p m G Zr O >
E in E yc vJi Fa a is �.c o. Ch
m gi p c:Lgm 'c r. 1mO m m > c
a m m c. m 8 �. E d �. c OE
C 8
m a c
Emmoa rn.c8
L C j C f0 N y m 0 O
CO c c Q 7y cc 'o�io •rs tR H m a Z v a •� E
F u fO o ami m ¢ .a • v o . v Q o m .�-
2 N m Z e � c o o � a 9 L° om cm m `-'
cc
W - E 1 0= CD ,0 Za i aai $ c ._. n Z_ 5 M a c
a
W Cl m �� m oa o. m 8ss aai o E �.m a� E
W E CO � c n5 O -S2 mom+ $ c.� c m a>i on
m COB c� ma cmc E E a+ a CD
Q co c m m m •- my m ` p"m � v
w 0 c g V U-o m m m = E. y c
E� ii m �_p n 2 E H m c c � E o m c c
CL c 1 U GOU _ nmZ ._ m m - 3a m 3
O m W
K m m
cl
� a E Ep
N N m p
n m O
cn
E U p
AITACHMT3
h
G w R
c �
v h i d m
m E
� cm
LU
a c-v o• Qaa
m o., m
C N m N O mE 01
m 7
10
0 O a = ai v E w
v N
c
Cmm. c y m m
y •cdLnoc
co O a
im 11 -o0coWmo
0. � 8 . m JR
m
..
c cO 'mom o LT c c
w q m a m c c s m E`
m m o
LL a) O m c d = G O O C
m. awi E c v mm c N o m w
m O m 8 m LL N E S E
C w _
E C O �Cp C�
mO C a U U
o w E a v= .
N +"
0,11
W O)
d C C
08
n .
G .3 m v rn
19 m c rn o m y -E � z m � nm m
0
da o v yv m m N 0) o_ d rn m N °' - v E2v mca E y w
m e m e ca a m �+ -0 m ,m .o to c m e c n I,A °> V O •m o c
> a� :? 8 -9 �.v `m cc 0 o. O = o_-0 CL to Qpm. c E E E
m Q gees ai m = E t3 � c o- awi ° n o o � Ea 1O o e;5m `� h m
m E E ` 2 w 0 m o. c — $ ¢ os o � D m m :� 4) o m .s.Qv N e o o.
c' t� c 'n $ mLL m o 08 N O` cc �� y � a' E m O o m o E aci Ca 8 na
CO vm � ccs o` vmCD cc i � a8 � oa3ia� E3ma� dyE� wwtS oaU'
c LD .a. m'w � mcLL m,tO c °' c c o c E ? c � � £ E ° = c c n
o >0 =0 ffi : � F c rnm > Y mii m c E c y CL . y m `m � D m .L m E m n'� v
v m C O 7 N m m 'j •_ — A�-' ._ O E 'gn H m ?N y E N V
V Oto O N m � m L m m awi m NEc p E n � E- g m Qa my a°'i mL ami c.
¢ E c m to= c3U0 5 v md' -o ._ E $ m °n' m ._ �` o ._ cIE o. E mu. _ .. LL w
U
E it
m m U U
c CMU
O` O L:,:a O O
g = a `a a= z z
E
IX
C
m m m n ¢ U
E
J h m
mfn Q .o cm �'C �. m
11
G m C .
E mE m; ma mErnmE �
nc — o c E
�..o Q
r E 2 aci 4) `o w
O me c = atm mL
m m
�UCp v
H N m m = N -g
W C/3 �� 2 E cD oc. 8ca
_
W ' 1¢ O c'- otci m E m y 'v,
w E 11 Q o � EE t�ii c c c
f ts 2c c coz- 9 - rL=
d m co c � LmE c C � c � N
AC7e CD
o c $ a_Eico � U E m fO tri
c.W a o.-o10 mom. 'M 75 n
Ed c� E m m cm E $ E 2S
ae m m W w
Eli
t"i _
O
ATTACHMENT
g T
C � �
19
N m m t•' m Q
m ^m oI5 c � o vi y ^am o �3 m �
ac_ m E o o c a, $�j � � ��i �c_ m m Lv o
ammoa> � t 'otm � E 'S ca nammoa3 � mo' $ p
Gt Oc $ 5 z E m v 3 m o Z c c - •Z E m cr_ cm
S a r m
zs y m o� amTE E E Z c m $ m we .. m o � m m 'a3 E
W �+ c L N N E n W O C f .2 '� N W f0
j
ME a o � g-cD v N co n c m D � m e c� c �� a E, c $ g.a m E
a p E Eami `� m � c.E- � � H � �� m ms E � � H m c � aE$ �
mrn a 'c o o 'm 8 aso -6 - �^
E g o ` 'm H Aa n `c4 d ch'? `c=4 S �.a
E cvr `o o m m � c a 8 s E E n cv y o o m5 , c
W 0 2 O) C m m C O tOii m yCmJ 0 O G.�m L 0 CCU 6` 1 d 0 ' y m
(A 11O G N O � > — N O
a cm o m E $� 5 as o a m a E S o y m acm � 3 m E np S as o y m CL
E
c �0 rn2 m 8 m r� c �° cE = o'Yi aNiaE = m� yam _ 9 y `m H o m tea' c
U- n c - E m aci - y n - c $ N 2 -9 E rn N N m ` m aci £ m a Cr`3 ._ c
m c.5 E a.Nm.. E 8 n€ y 'm m y ca c m ? aEi c.5 E nm E_y n€ E m
& o m 8 nc 8 � m CD � E wcmiBE EU L o 8 nc 8 Ea "m
8
� o
m aci d
v _w Eac c
m
'011 Q cc •y •W
or
M It
d C C C
-
om
c o
Ea
> m
o.> ch
r dE
m� c E U
L O
Ila m
E it CN gg
C m �LL
C C
:O U
� m_ U U U
Q d E cn N N
U c Q
0 E i011 E
Im E U 0 -
U
N 5 a mS Z Z Z
E
e
a CL co
.9 Pon -Oj a¢ G O O
u m c
J c3 Em m
C } C O m m m G�
m m Q E C lO C j (D m U O C ^.
Q O m 3 -0 m E m m
m m'm EQ.d m m 5 c E a m N
y E
pp d N
C m= �V 68. 0 •YOc N'9 GC
=
M, m .t3 8 E +(O.
W ca0 c - = -§ a)
1y- h `2°= m aco m cE nMa Q c o c
LU h E� aCc ma`3mECc aEcE
ri 5cc
LU cc R= .m.. m E S i � � r m •p
W E y c c =8 IS cc
Q m v c �Y
Q CLcm (D
ca �:3 Eooc $ � �C E
mR' G� v_ � 3_ c E € � CL U m � 0
E� c m'+' �' c C t Cts a Qng�
a yQ 25 0
a U 8 n5 U 8 N ga c51 m
ac ft t w
G =
m m E E.�,4 =aAo =m
s 15 `°
E
ec �
9
E
ATTACHMENT 3
e c m c y m
m c� p p
O) m }S �5 m m .r m O O O U 7 T.v «. •� } �. v
c c �' CE'_
EF yf N m E � cm m� m Cr m � aa
LL E Z � m W c � oomvi a0L � _ � � ccN �
v c o mm ac $� E �'m '_ � c EaEcca 33c �
w c 99 w__ mcm --$� n� EO E mna1Oc cScdii m c > cLii
E g E �c.5 m y n•,mo_ o m > c rn� m �° a� ao �e 07 E 20- n«pp. Y
WL° c $ � c � $ -�' mNyyQ oma tS — E mz • � — E m
o O a H 3 Cm �o c io yo n v ? E y c-9 $ ami � =.S2 07 c $ d �'
m S m $ E d y m m g m 3 o n m m
ca `� °��t }caoa1Oc � pme `o �Q � cma c� c � cOmE � � EocO
N 1! S.•e m p 32 > mp E C N _N y O gm O) l0 � E � C/� 5 $ m �. U C/3
U '__. .'mC $ y a R Q > O n C m R C O 'cm.. 8 6 y C) C L o 0 m0 .� pp C L n.o
5 00 a' o_ a) -E aciv 19 �' aci oO c E 'y o m mw m e Ln p c coo W m N nc
w N c. L �
rn '; m �' c _m aEi 'o m CD cm c D m m ' > m y m o m c c of m E c ai m c m m
!L of 2 y •= - N Ec ` � •NQ� o •� RNy�3oc occNy� cps
v m m c .0 E c n a o n m c m n,,. a •_ 'i"' mi '> .ac in ._ a r v�
ma mU $ a EU cL E -aaU nnE ti c� u E CL m cc nnm $ a1L- m nCl
`O
c
3
c' o Q a c c c c
3c R co
�c 3
-'C C1 E a C C •C C C C
� ar
It
o
m U
Ea c
a E co d o
c E > a c a
Q v 3m m
a E E c a y
V o N 9 N
Cl -
cl)
m my
C L
gm m
A E U�? N '-
o m _crna Mco
v U U U U U m U
m c >
n
Q E c E 0) � CD N co m rn
y U t
m E U E
E U
_ " UC13 CA - y
= d
m a= z z z z z
E
ccc CD CIE 11
m
o¢ U 3
Q. O. c N 2 CO J J J C
E F O -U<
J CA m
m � om nc e ca c o xOE
m Q N � -o
C% M EN
Et - m Cn N
E m �Of�om
m aN °c; y N Q m E v c = a
€ m m c m c yc 5 � t c o2`o aci E 5 n-� y m e � .p m m cquci �.
ma � mEa cm 4) Amo - � _ m2Enc Emo
'C Ex 'cam 3E n3c'0Bco cc 'WD 3c -o � �
o me N '� o € v aoi g o ¢ c N �� m m rnm m .' $ m m 75 .0
CO c N W E mag o o v p0r aai 75 r m h m N N a Q
F u 1O aci c c c co 0 8mm LL p N c c m g c E N :° m E oti Qv m ' o
W ii x ID2 $ m c y s .d j d L LL.? c mm 75 .2 nN m p R
C O N 3 3
J CX E __ Q o co R c > > Q ayi o LB (am CD o E E mm 3 � 'oc m � u� c� m r
CL cm
W Dc a � $ m 'ocn' � accmmv > � � c'ycc� 00 > '03o OE.=
Yi g8 3 cam £ � '8 oa c3 m m c � an d m $ o m m E J o �° � �cp J nv
ai Nm y d N W -0 $ y yCy 2 m m Cp m C n C m N •O CA m m> `� m ym () (p m
W o C C's m 'O C -m- U 'mC m N y S a O E E m m' y .y .a W N C yC•O
o.� n ca
c x n $ c CX Cc C nm m -0 g nU m c m C f�i > wn. b' o
- y n Eu. mmaE c N E � vra m N o E ci •3 mt m �m mem a otq �
cU - —
y.a N W W
CL
E E4m
w
a a o a a a c
E .� !K U 0
O O lul
O O
ATTACHMENT 3
L. W W
E om y
T. N. a - .O N.
W im{pp 3 p- 3 w °� v >.£_ m ���pp �. 'g E o
m 'i3. W T U W O - t m $ C (CO W T V m C O
a .9 v2Eprn a) ow co f v —ao) Evl -0 � :2W8W
> _ �p op C CD _
Ol C G h E f.! N C m C co O. m O N O.O C Q W lo.. m E E oain npo�eo 15v E �a m N 8 c no
- O G'O W C' Q C s 'E G10 W C L W W co
CL �a 3 0D W WW m o nEa c0 3 0 � W ami Ea m
cEWEm £ cWy MCC . ,JmEm £ c fmo L> n.-.4 3m
h � m > coe a`l c = Z a` 2 — co 8 W c = m e na E o � � >
C13 s
C C y $ N L m U C W C La Z3 ca CL d C.C y $ N W $ C Ol O 'fl C C m
E al o E c m w m m E c m m n E !!! m m £ Ol W c� C c a y E
cc
LL C y N y O N L '� N S c N N [Ca y. N n O•� O W >
�� m o 'O m 0 0 5 m H ai is n n.W 'O � m 0 O C d Cc 0 V C p m
c m
� o
15
o ca c c c
V E¢ •E p E o 0
co Ol Y Y
OW >a c c c c
ga
w �
m D o _ a m
a
W ca M
N y� N Q- N
W = N
ac' CD m a aa) a
c E> E tC o aci a 3
o Q m -R o � o
m =E c Ca $3w �o
Ol C O yW.. m N
m W nr U N w
U m 2 �l c o
m 11 m U {gyp O C S C
t
E 1` r I� N C a7 "V. c 2 �. fig. g� a E y
s .y v M 5 8 ts
-p - m U U U U U U W m m
v f6 ocl
m O O O O O OQ " amicEo
E cE rn U U U U yn � � m ._
� c >
U m o
S E II U E
m L° U
yCM ts U B
z C 'a= Z Z Z 2 Z Z
CL
E
E m
:. o rl > c c
m WL CL` u o 0
E FAQ J N¢ J C J J C J
D
11 "m C
m
J x E o c
m m Q ca
a m 2 0 0 �° � a m _j E � ami
E m d ai n � m y E �° ami ai oto m ami H o o
m E n m m 8 • aUi g2 CD n W m 8 'E tr' a m asci c.
z m m n o ' E nv W m c n o m 2 E o,v (D '0 tM
'-' 0 0 m C W m O o m
c mm c - '0 0 3 pcp W a " w mal 0 3 cp �i a E E 3o a
cn C'C C W. m 8 N C 5 m C W m 8 N C. N Ol= N
N n m
c y c o Fiv E a m c..c c o �iv CD
W `
LU tq E 3 mo 8 n$ � �ID 0. �3 o O n.� e
Wo K wpm�p m m m m i, 3 3 -m�a d m mLn a. c yy3 t i
J gyp_ O W E O m +' r? U W L W O m +" W N m
W CL
0 S a) N N �i C W — W S N W Q N C$ C m W m C O E
pc co c 0 ai > W �cp > O n N c $ a m (cp >0 LD >
W CJ fW ca � E N U n C W ca -0 m. € m (7 E Q 9p
ca
W C a C U a? W y -0 L N N 'W' ®� c ~(� N m ' co c tp C c
O W y ep m W pyQv� of m N V rn m
II C W N -f)
m N N O E C: O N E m' C co Q O N C
a c a0 n m = n a CL CO 12 m 0. g c m = n O N.= m o
CC�
w W
m- C
h m E E� gi >- -rn = rn
m
= E y m a� a a � a � a � a
11 cc
E 2 0 O O O O O 0
/-73
ATTACHMENT 3
a
o m � aEi c c m Ewan c
W 2 C.m m $ E c me m $
c. = d o E. w
n
i 0 E N C ami c n-no
a�ai y c a
m E m c " 2
c m - ? `3L't ca y Fiv y3 ca b y m c
C c0-
CL
.9L loo mw m 3 p' r -o m 2 E 3 cU E m
y � m a.cwEovm naaE 'o � vS 'E
CL
. � ao� E
•ELmE - aLA a Z' 2ai : Z0iO
qCL
C 0 m U c 0 p c m cl,m c14 .tJ cR m. O c m p N m 0
LL C m N C 1a y c m ,.N. N y C m N c c" �. a' E
pa Nmmp € � mcc
c Nmmon€iE _m2 � 0 8 b
m Q t a O O d ..0.. > C L n 0 m $ S E a d m 0
o+ H E atpp5 m m H E ncnv5 m to cc CL
c m
m
o C
v m na O o a
m N Q Y Y Ol
oInga —
Q
� o
E
E�
Q E
n� �
c
0 EQ =
m m a
o. c E L
o
cx
m u m
U ti pr
c
O m acoV
mu U U
a om
Ea
coE� E
.o
0 E u U cx
E
tm 0-
U
c d 1O 'n= z z
E � o
c C as
V c
CL CL c m¢ 3
0 0
E f G 0 'd Q G C O
II m C 73
N
mm o _j y IWD p m
E n dam m ai aN c � p � o � �° dU o1'S "o
m E cNQ E i� w ��Npp E 'E m m c m 2N -i E m � w m ui � � CL
Y g m ca Y @ ma E m a`� , +.m co
m �a E E2 E2 m rn•- c ac 8 •� m' c�
0 p1 C ; c :a ; c.•O 0 > y C_) E n C.m m. N m O)= U C 0)
m m a $ °Ji c 8 �i c m a c m m E H
ccomp_ � 32 Em � cEU->0 W C0 (U W CD0m : mui
2 CA K p am p a� > Q1.-Q,� R 8 — N N N Ta g.L cwi
w Eu aNm « am o = m. m � .3 `i3 - $ - mcSTm
W m ` za' ? m�� 0) = ym� Lfin. oy a�ic £�. N.tt 'O0E � omE
�_ o m� o _ m _ m c m ; Ste? o Q m "' m m E c -
W E C1.17g m •mr3 c m mv' .FS a m N o.•3.L, na3i a�i �•°: N 0a �
mCg m 8'- m c •-am c`4 - ma •- cl. c
v co e -Tcop€��gaN. a�i c � Ec �m "p� o >E, m'� a' o' " mcac
E 11 � L c N 9' m O N co O' t'n Q'a-' H a� C•a m y E mo �.m m c
IL cv H - m . n - mIZ E E �' `o 2' m c m m L L m m o � m
ae m two w
o.
c
E E _; _�
MEi U
m 2 2 2
11 c
11 it UN N' U N
E L 121' O O w -00
O
ATROHMENT 3
r s t o
dz
aS'� � ~ 3 � v ami N' m
ano �°.1- Ecy
'mo �- g E5 � c E � c o $ a
LU
CM �cd
� $ w8mw IDmcc
C�m y ai cv
CL mo-
n. N
'ti.: ao5i E m m w m y� = v 'md
to m > E U >
m
U c m t ULm., y m
c 11 ^ m m m N R3g m C C a, B
D d • w E �.- C 6 €: 7 p m c
C O ,�••' `p C E E p m .0 $ w S
u m o m r U c m LL 0
ID m a `� chi c
p nc _a L` nE € j � nQ
¢ a U- E E m
c m
3 c o
c c c
0_
na
y« c
is
i CL >
oa
cc acao
m E ., ts m c c N rr c c m m. o m m
E a m m 2 .2 m 8 `o'a
> m G N rm. m m ELm..
nE s. � � �_ c� m -a' c � L � 3 $ m vi o ani
co E Q m e 3'v' E E He c n� c � aci c c m m y d
m c E aU � $ o E c N •o N 1O o cam = aEi y c�m:a $
C— � m C 7 U N N N >'
y L- N Cm a L m IgCc c o, m m m m a
m U) m e no j c CL N cd H m m c E p o c o d c
cl C5 L) Q � c y Ew m vg E $ o .� o �' no m cc
o co w
a o V g o m 'v d o m E a m Z o y $' z aci E m
m o 3 N -- - m c o m m nE
cma � Nmm 3 '" E c
m c - m c a m •g m o c c L m c pp
Q E c E - JS m m N —i-CL m � Q � m £ N EL .0 o o.w
V U r
m
0 E u 6
Up E '• .
w U - j••
� Sa 1° cc z z
E ¢ �
o € Aa
v -
m W ' a tai
CL
E ~G c �¢ ..• D G
J E Ci
mcx
m Q :ii A aO1 O.C m
EmE _ m EoH � mc
€ m o > m
a m ani c a c c c 0 o
o . € c
E E
VJ N m r :.. 0.
O 10 n qm�.LL O d
F II m N L`S' m U
W y E s U L m c g S
mx ,; m mU d m a - c
J LU E II �. 8 a O 01 CLL CZ
2 p i'`,' Cc m C 2 N m p C
LD co }`- NEm � En'v - icc ,9,
O c c� a > m o � � cm � E
CIO co > Qc $
o.W u W X Yom. n$ r� c 'ov m
Eacc E
98 Q E c m Da` .c_ ZLL
Q' m '0 W far:
3
w W E
.2 A _$' a
z Z
Eh m Co o CL y
'�'• .� f OL' �J 3 O
I' 11 ACHMEN 3
Findings
V. ALTERNATIVES
The City/Zone 9 began reviewing alternatives to address flooding issues in 1999. Questa
Engineering, upon completion of a detailed hydrologic analysis, presented a list of alternative
project actions for consideration, as well as recommended goals and policies. The City/Zone 9
evaluated these alternatives in detail and from the list chose three alternative scenarios for further
consideration.. The project alternatives consist of a functional grouping of a number of discrete
project actions that would address local flooding problems along the various reaches of SLO
Creek. The information in this alternatives section summarizes more than three years of
evaluation of flood management solutions. The City/Zone 9 preferred alternative is summarized
in the WMP, DDM and SSMP.
A. ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION
In preparing the flood management section of the WMP, a large number of flood control
concepts were initially evaluated as a "long-list" of possible flood management alternatives. A
number of these were considered in earlier studies by Nolte (1977), by the Corps of Engineers
(1982, or by Shaff and Wheeler (1989). Upon further analysis by the project study team, these
were not considered feasible, either from a technical, cost, or environmental and permitting
difficulty perspective. These conceptual projects were eliminated in developing the "short-list"
of project alternatives and were recommended by the Zone 9 Advisory Committee to be placed
in the category of"Not Considered Feasible, and Not Evaluated Further." The projects, which
were reviewed and determined to be infeasible, included:
1. Buried By-pass Culverts
• A buried by-pass culvert around the downtown business district, running down
Pacific Street or down Meadow Creek.
2. Floodwalls
• Floodwalls along the east bank of SLO Creek from Nipomo Street to Madonna Road.
• A set of levees/floodwalls along both creek banks above Prado Road combined with
property acquisition of floodplain areas on the streamside of the floodwalls.
• A set of small levees/berms to prevent flow from spilling across Highway 101
between Madonna and Prado Roads.
• Construction of a floodwall near Andrews Street.
3. Significant Channel Enlargement
• Significantly widening the channel of SLO Creek between Marsh Street and
Madonna Road to provide 50-year flood capacity.
4. Flood Detention Basins
• Upper Stenner Creek
• Upper SLO Creek(in area above Reservoir Canyon Road)
1018/2003 46
�-Ar
\ ATTAC}N3
Findings
These alternatives are described in WMP Appendix D and are incorporated herein by reference
(refer also to EIS/R Appendix Q. The WMP identifies these alternatives collectively as
Alternative 3. This WMP Alternative 3 has been dropped from consideration in the EIS/R.
In addition to the above alternatives, the consultant eliminated from consideration any
alternatives that would have removed drainage design and stream management and maintenance
components of the Program. It is obvious that these components are necessary in managing the
watershed, and these can be modified to incorporate any mitigation measures identified during
environmental review. They are also an integral part of federal and state requirements to enforce
CESA and FESA, the Clean Water Act (and NPDES), the Clean Air Act and state and federal
Historic Preservation Acts.
A ``creek setback" alternative was also considered, but it was determined that the modifying the
City's standards for creek setback was a separate issue, more directly relating to development
standards. The current City standard would remain in place, regardless of the activities
associated with the WMP,and for this reason it was eliminated from consideration.
B. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
The No Action alternative maintains the status quo; that is, current policies, ordinances and
standards for the City and for the County would regulate work in and affecting the watershed
creeks. The City would continue to use the Flood Management Policy adopted June 1983 and
referred to as the "Pink Book" (refer to EIS/R Appendix G for the Flood Management Policy).
Work in the creeks in the City would also continue to be regulated by requirements of the
General Plan Land Use Element (April 1997); the General Plan Open Space Element (January
1994); the Zoning Regulations (February 2000) and the Community Design Guidelines
(November 2002).
The County of San Luis Obispo would continue to use the existing 1986 Engineering Standards
and Specifications along with the existing Land Use Ordinance/Title 22 (November 21, 2001)
including Sections 22.05.040 — (Grading and Drainage) Standards, 22.05.060 — Tree Removal
and 22.07.060 — Flood Hazard Area; and the Coastal Zone Land Use Ordinance/Title 23 (June
19, 2001) including Sections 23.05.036 — Sedimentation and Erosion Control, 23.05.040 —
Drainage, 23.05.060—Tree Removal, and 23.07.060 — Flood Hazard Area. (applicable portions
of the Engineering Standards,Title 22 and Title 23 are contained in EIS/R Appendix H).
The No Action alternative relies on existing programs and projects to address some of the needs,
but fails to provide the guidance necessary for sound flood management, nor does the No Action
alternative provide any of the mandates required by trustee and responsible state and federal
agencies. The potential effects of the No Action alternative include more unavoidable adverse
effects than other alteratives and are addressed in Chapters VII and VIII of the EIS/R.
10/8/2003 47
�`77
ATTANY 3
Findings
C. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED THAT MEET SOME OR ALL OF THE
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND NEED OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
Several groupings of projects or alternatives were evaluated from a technical, environmental, and
cost perspective during the course of the Program development. They are evaluated in Chapters
VII and VIII of this EIS/R, and they include the following:
• Alternative 1-Design Modifications to the Proposed Action. A technically and
financially viable Design Alternative that could be constructed at a lower cost than
the proposed action,but that has greater environmental impacts.
• Alternative 2- Low Cost/Low Impact Alternative that would provide limited
additional flood protection.
• Alternative 3 — Proposed Action Without Special Floodplain Management
Policies and/or No Adverse Impact Policies would retain the existing City and
County policies regarding channel design and floodplain management along with the
proposed improvements and design standards.
The features of each of these alternatives are discussed in the sections below. EIS/R Table V-1
provides a quick comparison of the features that are components of the proposed Program, the
No Action alternative and these three alternatives that meet some or all of the purpose and need
of the Program.
1. Alternative 1 - Design Modifications to the Proposed Action
Alternative 1 includes the same elements discussed for the proposed action, including stream
maintenance, stream management, bank stabilization and repair, channel design, development
drainage design, drainage design policies, and waterway enhancement. These project elements
replace the Pink Book and augment the County design standards (for the SLO watershed areas
only). The difference between this alternative and the proposed action is the level of capital
improvement projects proposed. The structural projects would provide a similar or higher level
of flood protection as compared to the proposed action, but channel environment disturbance
would be higher. (Upper channel banks of the creeks would be modified for increased capacity
instead of creating high flow by-pass channels.) Construction costs would generally be lower,
because less land would need to be purchased for channel widening than the proposed action
with by-pass channels. This alternative evolved from discussions and review of the proposed
action by the Zone 9 Advisory Committee. It represents an alternative that could be constructed
with less overall costs than the proposed action,but with greater environmental impacts.
All five of the Capital Improvement projects of the proposed action would be included in
Alternative 1; however, several of the components have modified designs (as noted above) that
may differ in their environmental impacts and in costs of construction, as compared to the
proposed action. Further information regarding the modified design components is provided in
WMT Appendix D.
101812003 48
ATTACHMENT I
Findings
Modified design components include the following features:
• Widen SLO/Prefumo Creek Confluence near Los Osos Valley Road,just below the
confluence of Prefumo and SLO Creeks, to prevent flow from backing up onto
Highway 101 and into Prefumo Creek on the west side of the Highway, (instead of
the by-pass channel of the proposed action).
• Channel Widening Between Cemetery above Elks Lane and WWTP below
Prado Road. This would include replacement of the proposed action by-pass
channel with a channel-widening project from above Elks Lane downstream to Prado
Road. The widened channel would be designed to provide 100-year protection for the
adjacent mainly undeveloped floodplain and would prevent flow from spilling across
Highway 101 and flooding the historic floodplain on the west side of the highway at
the 100-year event.
• Floodplain Excavation in Mid-Higuera Area. This would include a floodplain by-
pass channel excavation within the Mid-Higuera Business District, similar to the
proposed action. However, the initial channel excavation work just below the Marsh
Street Bridge would occur on the east bank downstream to just below the Bianchi
Lane Bridge, and not on the west side at the Madonna Company construction yard.
2. Altemative 2 - Low Cost/Low Impact
Alternative 2 also includes the same elements discussed for the proposed action, including
stream maintenance, stream management, bank stabilization and repair, channel design,
development drainage design, drainage design policies, and waterway enhancement. These
project components update the City Pink Book and augment the County standards (for the SLO
Creek watershed). Alternative 2 represents a lower level of flood protection than the proposed
action and the other project alternatives evaluated. Several of the individual project elements of
this alternative are similar to the smaller components of the proposed action, but the more
extensive channel modifications and floodplain by-pass channel excavation components have
been eliminated. For the most part, the projects associated with Alternative 2 would be restricted
to specific channel constrictions or breakout points along San Luis Obispo and Stenner Creeks..
Alternative 2 includes the following:
• Minor excavation and a revised vegetation management program along the reach
of SLO Creek between Marsh Street and Madonna Road.
• Replacing three bridges on Stenner Creek, as in the proposed action.
• Improving flood detention storage on SLO Creek above Cuesta Park, as in the
proposed action.
The proposed stream maintenance and management elements of the proposed action would be
retained; however, the amount of thinning and limbing work would be more conservative and
scaled back substantially. An additional component of Alternative 2 would entail excavation of
a floodway terrace on the creek's east bank immediately downstream of the Marsh Street Bridge
(Reach 10 at the current McNamara Real Estate building property). In addition, some minor
10/812003 49
Findings
improvements to the channel upstream of Marsh Street Bridge would be included to reduce the
effects of sediment and debris blockage of the bridge barrels. As with the Proposed Action, the
three undersized bridges on Stenner Creek (at Foothill, Murray, and Santa Rosa Streets) would
be replaced, and the detention storage flood control benefits of the undersized culvert at Cuesta
Park would be enhanced as a component of this project, as in the proposed action. Alternative 2
is explained in more detail in WMP Appendix D.
3. Alternative 3 - Proposed Action without Managed Fill and No Adverse Impact
Policy
The Proposed Action includes floodplain management regulations for the portions of the
watershed's principal floodplain in the Special Floodplain Management Zone #2. This zone
extends downstream from Madonna Road along SLO Creek all the way to Avila Beach as well
as the undeveloped floodplain areas along Prefumo Creek and in the Laguna Lake area. This
policy requires that fill for elevating portions of a floodplain property above the 100-year flood
level be ``balanced" by excavation of other portions of the property within the floodplain,
resulting in no net loss of floodplain capacity and no net increase in floodwater elevation.
The Proposed Action also includes a No Adverse Impact policy for the entire SLO Creek
watershed to inure that future development and redevelopment does not cause additional
flooding, bank erosion, or habitat damage. The No Adverse Impact policy focus is on
determining and mitigating impacts of increased runoff and change in stormwater flow
characteristics caused by development, recognizing that on-site stormwater detention may not be
needed or even recommended in some lower portions of the watershed.
Both policies would require applicants to complete a detailed review of project impacts on
stream biology and geomorphology, and would require a higher level of hydrologic design
analysis and a more comprehensive review by City and County engineering staff.
With Alternative 3, the proposed action elements and Capital Improvement projects of the
Proposed Action would remain the same with the exception that the Managed Fill policy would
be replaced by the existing provision that requires all new residential building pads being created
to provide for a first floor elevation a minimum of one-foot above the 100-year storm high water
elevation. The No Adverse Impact policy would not remain but would be replaced with current
City and County floodplain management standards.
D. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
The City/Zone 9 have identified the proposed action as the environmentally superior alternative
because it most closely meets the objectives of flood management while having the least
environmental impact,once mitigated.
10/8/2003 50
Findings
VI. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires that when a public agency is making the
findings required by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 (A) (a), codified as Section 21081
(A) of the Public Resources Code, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring
program for the changes to the proposed project which it has adopted or made a condition of
approval, in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.
The EIS/R includes the Mitigation Monitoring Program as Chapter 10. Much of the monitoring
program includes changes to the WMP, DDM and SMMP and additions to BMPs. In addition,
the monitoring program identifies tiering of environmental review and the necessary preparation
of environmental impact reports for Capital Improvement projects at the time of their proposal
by the City. The necessary subsequent environmental review of potential impacts is listed in
Chapter X of the EIS/R for each.capital improvement project. Also included is the process for
implementation of the Annual Work Plan(AWP).
The SMMP contains measures for preparation of an Annual Work Plan (AWP). In order to
implement the AWP, the SMMP breaks down the program activities into Categories 1, 2, and 3.
The AWP will summarize the Category 1 activities planned for each work season since they do
not normally require a Section 404 permit. These activities will, however, be conducted
pursuant to the guidelines contained in the WMP Program. The AWP will be the reporting
vehicle to the state and federal agencies and will be a means to quantify the work effort and
record the activity as part of the cumulative effects along the waterways. SMMP Appendix B
includes a worksheet designed to convey the necessary information to the agencies regarding the
work plan for Category 1 projects.
The Category 3 activities will not be a part of the AWP since they are large projects that should
be reviewed in detail separate from the AWP, and would require an Individual Section 404
permit and second-tier environmental review. Category 3 projects include the Capital
Improvement Projects and large privately requested projects that do not meet the guidelines
given in the WMT Program.
The AWP will focus on the Category 2 projects and cumulative effects of all work along the
SLO Creek waterway for the given work season. The Category 2 projects include dredging and
sediment removal, new bank repair projects, upgrade of existing hydraulic structures and bar
removal.. Currently,the review and approval procedures for the AWP have not been established;
however, the intent is to include only those projects that meet the requirements of the WMP
Program. SMMP Appendix B contains a worksheet that has been developed to cover Category 1
projects as a vehicle for informing state and federal agencies of work planned for the year. As an
action to implement the above EIS/R mitigation measures,it is recommended that this worksheet
be revised to include a summary of the necessary information for Category 2 projects, and this
can act as notification to the state and federal agencies of work planned for the year.
In addition, many of the mitigation measures recommended in the EIS/R relate to cumulative.
effects of projects along the creek and the temporal issues associated with them. The AWP will
be required to convey information to the state and federal agencies regarding cumulative effects
1018/1003 51
ATIACHMEW 3
Findings
of the planned work for the year. The AWP also will provide information regarding the success.
of mitigation measures applied to projects along the creek that have been constructed in previous
years. The AWP will summarize the annual reporting requirements of projects. Creation of a
worksheet is also recommended for demonstrating compliance of the mitigation measures
regarding cumulative effects.
The AWP will also provide an annual review of the overall Program to the state and federal
agencies. The purpose of the annual review is to build in flexibility and adaptive management
into the overall Program, including updating and revising planning procedures and design criteria
and standards periodically as better information and approaches are developed and accepted.
Changes to the design criteria and standards would be conveyed in the AWP.
1. Procedure for Implementing the AWP
The City and County would each submit their AWP; however, one of the agencies would be
responsible for determining the cumulative effects of all work effort planned for that year. The
following timetable is recommended to provide a framework for consolidating the information in
the AWP.
Activity Annual Target Date
Notice to be part of AWP(Public and Private projects would January 15
be listed for the work effort for the coming construction season)
Submittal of Development Package for all Private Projects to City of County February 1
Development of Category 1 Projects for season-Appendix B sheets March 1
Begin Environmental Determinations for all projects requiring April 1
CEQA review,probably a standard Negative Declaration or
Categorical Exemption
Addition of Emergency Projects due to rain Events,Public and May 1
Private Projects(Emergencies)
Cumulative Analysis of All Projects/Compensatory Mitigation May 15
in Place(Mitigation Banking with non-profit group)
Final City/County Approvals on discretionary Projects June 1
Summary of Program effectiveness and Annual Monitoring June 1
Reports summarized for AWP
Submit AWP and attachments to State and Federal Agencies July I
Agency comments or information requested July 15
Responses back from City and County on requested information August 1
Agency approvals for AWP with projects deleted that have specific concerns August 15
Construction Season for Category 1 and 2 projects August 15-October 31
10/8/2003 52
�'a
ATTACHMEW 3
Findings
It is intended that the WMP Program be inclusive of all agencies concerns and that the AWP
would be the vehicle for project notification and verification of consistency with the WMP.
Therefore,the AWP would be the method for the agencies to confirm that the projects meet their
respective requirements.
The City and County assume that plans and specifications can be developed during the project
review period and advertising of projects would meet this schedule as well. Award of the
projects and beginning of the work for the year would not begin until after receipt of agencies
approvals of the AWP. Work would commence after August 15. Typically, this timeframe is
adequate for most maintenance and minor bank repair projects. It is also the season when water
levels are lowest and the least environmental effects would occur.
VII. CEQA GENERAL FINDINGS
A. The City Council finds that the changes have been incorporated into the project to
mitigate or avoid.significant impacts. These changes include mitigation measures and
project modifications outlined herein and set for in more detail in the Programmatic
EIS/R, dated May 20, 2003, as amended with the Final EIR Response to Comments
prepared October 9,2003 (hereinafter referenced as the Final EIR).
B. The City Council finds that the implementation of the proposed project with
mitigation measures as identified in the Final EIR and as contained in the
recommendation to the City Council would have the fewest environmental effects
when compared to the other alternatives analyzed in the Final EIR.
C. The City Council finds that the project as approved includes an appropriate
Mitigation Monitoring Program. This Mitigation Monitoring Program ensures that
measures that avoid or lessen the significant project impacts, as required by CEQA
and the State CEQA Guidelines, will be implemented as described.
D. The City Council finds that the October 9, 2003 Final EIR was prepared in
accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. A Draft EIR(as part of the
Programmatic EIS/R) was circulated for public review and comment from May 20,
2003 to July 14, 2003. All comments received have been responded to (including a
response to the National Marine Fisheries Service letter of comment directed to the
EIS), and the responses and any resulting changes have been included in the Final
EIR-
101812003 _ 53
ATTACHME i I
Findings
VIII. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
CEQA requires lead agencies to balance the benefits of a project against its unavoidable
environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project
outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered "acceptable" (State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15093[a]). CEQA also requires, however, that where a lead agency
decision allows the occurrence of significant effects that are identified in the EIR and that are not
at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall support in writing the specific reasons for its
action. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the
administrative record (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093[b]). This required statement is
referred to as a Statement of Overriding Consideration.
There has been recent legislation regarding this issue from Communities for a Better
Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002), Cal. App.e [No. C038844. Third Dist.
Oct. 28, 2002.]. The following is from this legislation:
On the concept of tiering, CEQA section 21094, subdivision (a) adds as relevant:
" Where a prior [EIR] has been prepared and certified for a program, plan,
policy, or ordinance, the lead agency for a later project that meets the
requirements of this section shall examine significant effects of the later project
upon the environment by using a tiered[EIR], except that the report on the later
project need not examine those effects which the lead agency determines were
either (1) mitigated or avoided ... as a result of the prior[EIR], or (2) examined
at a sufficient level of detail in the prior [EIRJ to enable those effects to be
mitigated or avoided by site specific revision, the imposition of conditions, or by
other means in connection with approval of the later project."
Guidelines section 1515219(3), including subsection (9(3)(C) at issue here, states as
relevant:
"19 A later EIR shall be required when the[pre-EIR] initial study or other analysis finds
that the later project may cause significant effects on the environment that were not
adequately addressed in the prior EIR ...M ...[V
"(3) Significant environmental effects have been 'adequately addressed' if the lead
agency determines that:
"(A) they have been mitigated or avoided as a result of the prior[EIR] ...;
"(B) they have been examined at a sufficient level of detail in the prior[EIR] to enable
those effects to be mitigated or avoided by site [-]specific revisions, the imposition of
condition, or by other means in connection with the approval of the later project; or
"(C) they cannot be mitigated io avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts
despite the project proponent's willingness to accept all feasible mitigation measures,
and the only purpose of including analysis of such effect in another[EIR]would be to put
the agency in a position to adopt a statement of overriding considerations with respect to
the effects."
10/8/1003 54
ATIACHN I
Findings
The EIR identifies one significant unavoidable adverse impact that cannot be fully mitigated.
This relates to the adoption of design flow regulations (for creek flows) that provide for a less
than 100-year level of flood protection. The adoption of these design flow regulations will result
in continued exposure of people and structures to flooding. While a 100-year level of flood
protection is not a requirement of any flood protection programs, including FEMA's Floodplain
Management guidelines, it is a common community goal of local, state, and federal flood
protection programs. However, this standard cannot be achieved in San Luis Obispo in a cost-
effective manner or without significant adverse impacts of major channel modifications.
Proposed design flows shown in the following Table 3 (from the WMP and DDM) were
confirmed by the City Council in January 2002 to be used for flood management planning.
Table 3 - Proposed Channel Design Flow Rates
Waterway, Proposed Design Flow
Major Waterways within the City of SLI
SLO Creek above confluence with Stenner Creek 40 year
SLO Creek below confluence with Stenner Creek to Madonna Road 20 year
SLO Creek from Madonna Road to Prado Road 50 year
Prado Road to Confluence with Prefumo Creek 100 year
SLO Creek from Prefumo Creek confluence to Urban Reserve Line 100 year
SLO Creek below Urban Reserve Line-maintain e)dstng capacity Approx.10 year event for much of reach
Stenner Creek from SLO Creek to Chorro Street 50 year
Stenner Creek from Chono Street to Urban Reserve Line 100 year
Prefumo Creek within Urban Reserve Line 100 year
Old Garden Creek within Urban Reserve Line 25 year
East Fork of SLO Creek to Broad Street Varies3
Other Major Waterwio 50 Oar
Secunda Waterwa 5 25 year
Minor WaterWays6 10 year
1. For purposes of designating Design Flows,the required design capacities and design requirements,the system of creeks and
waterways in the SLO watershed is divided into major,secondary,and minor waterways. All existing and proposed conveyance
systems shall be analyzed and designed using the peak flows for the hydrographs developed per the procedures described in
Section 4 of the Drainage Design Manual to meet the design capacities.
2. 100-year protection can be provided with the Cuesta Park Detention Enhancement project.
3. East Fork of San Luis Obispo Creek is included in the Airport Area specific Plan. Standards and plans for flood management are
included in the plan and related environmental documents.
4. Other Major Waterways not named above and within the City Urban Reserve Line,or outside the City that have a drainage area of
over 10 km2 (4 sq.mi.)shall be designed for an average recurrence interval of 25 years with 0.6 m(2 ft)of freeboard,and shall
have sufficient capacity for a 50-year design discharge either by alternate surface routes(such as shallow street flow)or be
contained within the channel without freeboard.
5. Secondary Waterways have a drainage area of between 2.6 km2 and 10 km2(1 and 4 sq.mi.)and shall be designed for a stone
recurrence interval of 25 years,with 0.3 m(1 ft)of freeboard.
6. Minor Waterways have a drainage area of less than 2.6 km2 (1 sq.mi.)and shall be designed for a minimum stone recurrence
interval of 10 years,with 0.3 m 1 ft of freeboard.
Source: Table 5-2, WAP and DDM Section 5.2
Since the above design flows cannot provide a 100-year level of flood protection for all parts of
the community, their adoption is considered a significant unavoidable adverse impact and
requires a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Although the proposed design flows are an
improvement over the existing conditions, it is problematic to adopt Design Flows that continues
to expose people and structures to flooding.
10/8/2003 55
/— d J
i
ATIACHMEitl 13
Findings
The flood protection portion of the proposed action specifically relates to Category 3/Capital
Improvement Flood Control projects where the City will strive to meet Design Flows to reduce
flooding and adverse impacts to people and property.
Category 3/Capital Improvement projects were covered in the Programmatic EIS/R for the
purpose of reviewing the whole of the proposed project and for the purpose of determining
which activities would be eligible for inclusion in an Annual Work Plan for routine stream
maintenance and management. There are significant unavoidable adverse impacts associated
with the cumulative project that includes the Category 3/Capital Improvement projects that
would meet proposed Design Flows but continue to expose people and structures to flooding.
However, the WMP program activities and projects associated with flood management are
determined by the City Council to be superior to the existing policies and projects contained in
the "Pink Book". The economic and social benefits to the community, by providing some relief
from flooding when and if Category 3/Capital Improvement projects proceed forward, outweigh
the need for the City to meet a typical, but arbitrary, 100-year level of flood protection. This
Statement of Overriding Considerations applies to the policies regarding Design Flow
regulations and to Category 3/Capital Improvement projects only.
The Category 1 and 2 projects will not significantly alter flooding frequency, although they will
assist in reducing the effects of flooding by maintenance, management, habitat enhancement, and
aquatic habitat enhancement. Category 1 and 2 projects, in accordance with WMP standards,
will maintain existing channel conditions with respect to flood flow conveyance capacity, and
prevent further deterioration of conveyance capacity. This would not change the level of
flooding nor adversely affect existing conditions. Therefore, the activities that would be
permitted under the Annual Work Plan are not necessarily contributory to flooding nor would
they significantly assist flood reduction. For this reason, the City Council determines that the
impacts of maintenance and management through Category 1 and 2 projects are not significant
and would not require overriding considerations.
In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds that the
preferred project may have significant effects on the environment but that these effects will be
lessened to insignificance by incorporation of the mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR
portion of this Programmatic EIS/R. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, section
15092[a,b] the City Council certifies that the Final EIR portion of the Programmatic EIS/R,
dated October 9, 2003 (including the Public Hearing Draft dated May 20, 2003) has been
prepared in accordance with CEQA,and approves the project as recommended by Staff.
The City Council further finds that the projects for which additional environmental review would
be necessary include all projects identified as Category 3/Capital Improvement projects in the
Final EIR. Further action should not be taken on these projects until sufficient design
information is developed and submitted for review to ascertain potential impacts of these actions
on the environment and ensure that sufficient mitigation measures are incorporated into that
project design to reduce the significance of these impacts, including the possible need to review
the potential for Statement of Overriding Considerations.
10/8/2003 - 56
RECEIVED
OCT 14 2003
iiiiil�llllllllllll�����llu`II���I SLO CITY CLERK
council memmanaum
lCity of San Luis Obispo
DATE: October 14, 2003
TO: Mayor and Members of the Ci ouncil
VIA: Ken Hampian, CA
FROM: Lee Price, City Cler
SUBJECT: October 21"Public Hearing regarding the Waterway Management Plan
The attached draft letter to the County Board of Supervisors encouraging them to certify the EIR and
adopt the Waterway Management Program is being provided for Council review prior to considering
CAO Recommendation#3, which asks the Council to authorize the Mayor to sign and send the letter.
rd
ZCOUNCIL 'CDD DIR
Z CAO f2 FIN DIR
RED FILE ;nCAO 2-FIRE CHIEF
,2-ATTORNEY Z"FW DIR
ING AGENDA ZCLERK/CRIG ZPOLICE CHF
DA ID TEM 13 DEPT �
EADS REC DIR
� r TIL DIR
HR DIR
�-,t y off.
city
,:i4 oof sAn kt]IS OBISPO
0
�� OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
01 S O� 990 Palm Street m San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-3249 ■ 805/781-7119
October 21, 2003
Honorable Mike Ryan,Chairman ®R T
San Luis Obispo County
Board of Supervisors
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
Dear Chairman Ryan and Supervisors Achadjian,Bianchi,Ovitt and Pinard:
On behalf of the City Council of San Luis Obispo, I bring a matter of great importance to your attention.
As you are well aware, San Luis Obispo suffers periodically from flooding along San Luis Obispo creek
and its tributaries. Historically,the City and the County have tried through various efforts to minimize the
harmful effects of that flooding, with some successes.
Triggered by the floods of 1995, over the last several years, under the guidance and direction of your
Zone 9 Advisory Committee, the City has been working in partnership with County staff and several State
and Federal agencies to develop a San Luis Obispo Creek Waterway Management Program. The program
is intended to guide future flood protection efforts along San Luis Obispo Creek and its tributaries in a
way that is effective,yet highly sensitive to the creek environment.
The program will put in place a comprehensive management program for activities and development
along these waterways. The main components of the program include a master plan for the creek and its
tributaries,design standards and guidelines for construction and development, and maintenance and
management strategies for creek property owners. It is the first major update of the City's flood policies
since 1983,and it will provide a roadmap for future Council actions regarding flood protection and
development along the creek. The program will provide similar guidance to the County and Zone 9
efforts within the County area of the watershed.
On October 21, 2003, the City Council approved the program and certified the EIR. We understand that
your Board will be addressing this subject in the near future as the Waterway Management Program is
presented for your consideration. We urge your Board to adopt the program and certify the EIR so that it
can be implemented in the near future. With a consistent approach to managing the watershed,we can
reduce the flooding potential for future generations of both the City and County, and at the same time,
protect and maintain our beautiful creeks.
We appreciate the cooperative and collaborative efforts that have been made by your County staff
working with City staff and the members of the Zone 9 committee to be able to bring this program to
fruition.
Sincerely,
David F. Romero
Mayor
G:\Council Support i£Corresp\City Council Correspondence\Romero\Letters\Waterways Mgmt Plan.DOC
1 , D FILE
MEETING AGENDA
--- - - - - DATEAWaTEM #-J�-
MEMORANDUM
October 20, 2003
To: Ken Hampian, City Administrative Officer-q�e
From: Mike McCluskey, Public Works Director
Jay Walter, City Engineer
Subject: Alternative Resolution Language -Waterway Management Program
Ken,
Public Works received a fax from Council Member Schwartz that proposes additional
language to be added/substituted to the Resolution submitted as part of the agenda
package for the Waterway Management Program last week. After reviewing the proposed
language, staff has no objections to the wording, in that it does not change what we are
asking the Council to adopt. It actually adds a little more history and substance to the
proposed resolution. We propose that this be submitted to the Council as a Red File item
for their consideration.
i
2-COUNCIL C+CDD DIR
ICAO [}FIN DIR
CACAO 0-FIRE CHIEF
i
7—,—ATTORNEY [;-PW DIR
' --CLERK/ORIG [-POLICE CHF
J D P [
EADS 'REC DIR
I` D'UTIL DIR
r�--��.dG• [-HR DIR
RECEIVED
OCT :? G 2003
SLO CITY CLERK
w
Oct 20 03 08%09e P•--thorized User [8051 783-7751 P. 1
L
FAX This cover page plus 1
October 20,2003
TO: ray waiter,C• psi-�
From: Ken
Re: Oct. 21 Coon enda item PH#1,Waterways Management Plan
]ay, during our br.&g conference last TLursday I mentioned some concems about the
Aesohuian prepared by staff for Cauncff consideration_ Specifically.I was concerned
about a fuller explanation of(1)the natural predisposition of the watercourses through
the floodplain to change over time, and(2)the recant history of 9ooding.
I took some time to edit the language of the resolution to cover my concerns. This you
wn71 find in the second page of this FAX. Let me]mow if you would fmd this re-write
acceptable.
i
Oct 20 03 08:09a r� harized User le' -) 783-7751 p. 2
GSF
DRAFT'ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION(Ken Schwartz)
WHEREAS,over the course of natural history,ram water runoff has art a system of
gullies,creeks and channels into the land m the process of carrying these waters from the
Cuesta foothills d rougb what is now San Luis Obispo to the sea;and
WHEREAS,European man established the City of San Luis Obispo virtually in the
center of this drainage basin and platted the land into privately held parcels without heed
to natural drainage patterns,dangers of potential flooding, or the need or desire for public
access;and
WHEREAS,this drainage system has been and continues to be overwhelmed paiodically
by large storm events that are now gyred based on statistically reoccurring intervals
as 5 year stotms, 10 year stomia,on up to 100 year storm;and
WHEREAS,these pedodie flood events erode and aper the configuration and location of
these gullies, creeks and channels doing great damage to both the natural ad man-made
environment;and
WHEREAS,the rust mceatty recorded major floods ommed in 1969 and 1973;and
WHEREAS,the flood of 1973 was so severe and caused so much property damage that
San Luis Obispo was declared a National Disaster area;and
WHEREAS,the City Council in 1971 adopted a comprehensive flood mansgement plan
(Notre)with design standards and action plans to control creek modifications and
fiance;and
WHEREAS,the City subsequently worked collaboratively with resource agencies mad
environmental groups and updated its plan in 1983 to create a more comprehensive plan
to reduce flood damage while protectmg eaviremmentaily sensitive waterways;and
WHMEAS,this San Iris Obispo Creak Wwrway Nwnagement Plan of October 2003
will serve n guide for the present and future City Councils;and
WHE M4 S, . . . . and, (hist 2 whereas OK)
WHEREAS. . . .
NOW TMREFOR,BE IT RESOLVED. . . .
WnavMv asaaygea A dry
Richard Schmidt 45444247 MU 10/20/3 05:51 PM D1/4
RED FILE
MEETING AGENDA
RICHARD SCHMIDT DA IV b3 ITEM # EI
112 Broad Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 (805) 5444247
October 20, 2003
Re: Agenda Item 1 — Flood Control Oct. 21 Agenda Via Fax
Dear Council Members:
This agenda item strikes me as a huge indigestible lump, there are so many disparate
parts to it, and it includes so many different things, and has such huge implications
(financial, land use, environmental, bureaucratic, good government) for our city. Is the
Council really ready to bite off all of this and swallow it in one lump?
I'd urge the Council to take a more deliberative approach, to break things down into
their constituent parts, and to look at each in detail (at future meetings) prior to taking
any action.
What's before you is a radical change in how we are intending to treat our creeks
and our flood prone lands.
First of all, it is a huge and costly engineering undertaking the benefits of which to the
general public are dubious at best.
Second, the engineering portion of it -- despite the self-congratulatory comments
throughout the EIR about how sensitive we are to our riparian environment -- looks to
me like 1960s invasive pre-environmental flood control channelization cloaked in a thin
wash of green. (The in-stream paving is gone -- that's about it.)
Third, the land use implications are tremendous. There appears to be only one principal
reason why it is important to build huge flood channels in the Elks Lane and Los Osos
Valley Road areas -- to promote development of the flood plain. (Indeed, the EIR notes
that this will be the effect on the low-lying farmland south of LOVR, and sidesteps the
issue as something to be dealt with in the future.) This "flood control" promotes
neanderthal land use planning. Far more sensible is to protect life, property and public
safety by not building in flood prone areas; this is the universal lesson of building in
flood plains made "safe" by flood control projects. The flood WILL come, no matter how
great the engineering works are claimed to be.
Fourth, putting these grandiose construction plans front and center diverts further funds
and energy from dealing with maintaining what we already have. The city is criminally
negligent in failing to do routine floodway maintenance on existing streams despite its
rep' fry se in the to-be-rescinded Resolution 5138) to make
this McAmain emphasiattlifts flo d safety program. I have been annually trying to get the
Q.ACAO E�-FIRE CHIEF
C3-A70RNEY i`PW DIP Page 1
Ca-CLERK/ORiG E POUCECHF RECEIVED
11-DEPRADS 2 REC DIP
® (fS ❑ UTIL DIR OCT 0 2003
❑ Tirtln IHR DIR
- SLO CITY CLERK
Richard Schmidt ' 5444247 MD 10/2013 m5:52PM ®214
city to do one simple thing in my stretch of Old Garden Creek since 1996: to clear away
the weedy growth that the city has allowed to grow within the creek bottom into tree-
sized obstructions at the southerly exit of the Broad Street culvert. The city's response
has been alternately condescending, hostile, stonewalling, obfuscating; I have even
been told that politics is an issue. Meanwhile, the situation year by year has gotten
worse until today about 50% of the exit capacity of this huge culvert is blocked. Who is
respsonsible for this malfeasance that endangers property and life? Why is this
malfeasance allowed to continue by the council and administration even after the
problem is repeatedly called to their attention? Why is the program before you -- as
evidenced by the discussion in the staff report -- so totally preoccupied with constructing
megaprojects rather than with commonsense and easily accomplished safety
improvements like maintaining the existing channels to maximize their innate flood flow?
(Our whole section of creek is a mess, plugged with excessive growth and trash that
has washed down or been dumped overbank. My comments above about lack of
maintenance can be multiplied tenfold just within a block of my home.)
Fifth, the action before you calls for repealing Resolution 5138, the enlightened and
definitive 1984 Council statement that it is this city's policy to treat our creeks with true
environmental regard and to attempt to make the natural streams safer with regular
maintenance, shared between the city and the owners of the streams. You are being
asked to rescind this very enlightened policy statement, but what are you putting in its
place? The new resolution is bureaucratese and legalese, and has no soul or
environmental purpose to it, unlike the one being rescinded. I have to ask the Council,
are you intending to turn the clock backwards to the era of constant engineering
meddling with the creeks with only secondary (_ "little") regard for their natural features?
If not, don't you need a new statement that incorporates the best aspects of the 1984
statement? Why should you repeal the 1984 statement at all? Is it just too good to keep,
or what?
My suggestion to the Council is that you schedule a series of separately
agendized meetings to discuss as individual pieces what's before you tonight as
a single item. This is just too important to rush into adopting as a whole when the
written staff presentation barely scratches the surface of what they propose and offers
no analysis of alternatives or of the downside of what's proposed. (The staff report
offers only one option, and one point of view. That is not enough.) At the very least, the
meetings need to focus on single items: 1, preservation and maintenance policy; 2,
whether massive engineering schemes have a place or not; 3, whether they are
supportable financially and environmentally and from an enlightened land use position;
4, only after those important preliminaries are thoroughly discussed and understood by
council members andthe public, whether the specific program recommended by staff,
and "supported" by their EIR, is indeed one the city should adopt as its official creek
policy.
In the event the Council rejects such a prudent, precautionary approach, and acts
tonight, I wish to get the following comments into the record.
Page 2
Richard Schmidt 'Q 5444247 Pa10/20/3 05:53 PM ❑3/4
i
1. The EIR is not open-minded. It assumes a large engineering project, then focuses on
one in particular as the preferred project. Leaving things as they are, or making very
modest modifications, receive far too little favorable analysis. Yet, they were assumed
to be viable alternatives for years. The EIR seems created to supporta radical policy
shift, not to provide the needed broad, unbiased view of the issues and alternatives.
2. The EIR contains false assum tip ons. As summarized on page 8 - 9 of your staff
report, the conclusion is that there's a significant unavoidable adverse impact that
cannot be fully mitigated. What would this be? Perhaps that the project will destroy the
riparian habitat? Not at all. It is that less than a 100-year level of flood protection "will
result in continued exposure of people and structures to flooding." Say what? This is
nonsense. A 25-year level of protection will result in continued exposure of people and
structures to flooding. So will a 100-year level of protection. So will a 200-year level of
protection. So will a 500-year level. Pick your number, there will always be a storm that
will a) be larger than the one planned for and b) willl prove the assumptions of
engineers to be wrong. No level of engineering protection will end the danger from
flooding. This distortion of content is typical of the manner of this EIR. Why doesn't it
deal with the normal sorts of environmental effects required of EIRs instead of focusing
upon its engineering bias? Why does it conclude that what was previously an
acknowledged environmental attrocity is now the preferred alternative? (i.e. the mid-
Higuera project) The EIR seems to be off base as an EIR.
3. The EIR lacks analysis of the effects of the large widenings and bypass channels on
upstream areas. I raise this because of what our former city engineer tells me is the
cause of destructive erosion in my yard -- an effect, he indicates, of prior creek
widenings far downstream. We have had severe erosion, both bank erosion and bottom
erosion. Bottom erosion in my property has amounted to about 3 vertical feet in the time
I've lived there. I am told this was a byproduct of widenings in the Los Osos Valley Road
area, miles downstream, and of enlarging the Stenner Creek culvert beneath Highway
101, so that water is sucked downhill much faster than previously, thus increasing
erosive effects upstream. If one large widening miles away, and one small one a half
mile away had this much effect, what will be the effects of multiple larger widenings?
These effects are not dealt with in the EIR. The potential to damage upstream private
property and to fail to mitigate this problem through the CEQA process leaves the city in
an interesting liability situation when the eventual property damage resulting from these
effects occurs. I believe the city needs to add such a study to the EIR prior to
considering certification.
4. Why has the previously repudiated mid-Higuera widening/bypass channel gone from
environmental attrocity to environmentally preferred alternative? This scheme was
studied at length about 15 years ago. It was then the preferred alternative of the city, but
was trounced by the FWS and ACE as an environmental attrocity. The environmental
community agreed. Supposedly it was dead. Now it's resuscitated as a good green
alternative, according to the EIR. Why? Does this reflect upon a fundamental bias of the
Page 3
Richard Schmidt 85444247 18fl10l20l3 05:55 PM p414
I
supposedly analytical EIR? Or has an environmental attrocity really become a good
green alternative for some reason not explained? (Previously, the city had decided to
deal with mid-Higuera flood problems largely through enlightened land use and building
regulations, a focus now shunted aside.)
5. The engineering works proposed may not work as intended. When a stream bank is
partially widened (as the proposed "shelves" at various locations including mid-Higuera
will do), it has the effect of straightening the flow of the creek; the water seeks the
shortest route, erodes the widened bank and makes a straight shot to replace the
natural serpentine flow. This moves the flow from the natural serpentine channel to a
new straight channel. The speeded up water becomes more.erosive, both locally and
downstream. (Anybody recall the havoc gold miners did with their hydraulic mining?
Same principle: Aim some really high pressure fast water at a bank, and watch it
disappear.) The character of the stream-bottom habitat also changes, for the worse, as
pools disappear from the straightened, speeded up flow. When a bypass channel is built
to replace a serpentine route, the same thing happens. What will prevent the bypass
from becoming the new stream -- a freeway-like high speed stream? My guess is that
even if the entry and exit of the bypass are "protected" with rip-rap, concrete, etc., that
will soon wash out, the bottom of the elevated bypass will erode to natural stream level,
and all sorts of riparian mayhem will ensue.
6. How will the city afford all this n
engie eering construction and its maintenance when it
cannot afford routine maintenance? If the city cannot now afford to maintain its creeks in
a flood-safe manner, a relatively small task, how will it find the funds to maintain miles of
new, improved streams that most assurredly will require major high-input maintenance
just to continue to exist? The city's dismal record of maintenance on the status quo is
not a promising indicator of what will happen once staff is distracted big time by these
big projects.
7. What kind of message does it send to the public to rescind an eco-friendly council
policy statement and replace it with a big-engineering policy statement? I refer to
Resolution 5138. How is the public to read Administration's bringing this recision to
you? Where are the true friends of the environment at city hall? Where are the true
creek stewards? Hopefully the Council will stand up and say you want the existing pro-
environment, pro-natural-channel creek policies to continue. Please don't throw out
years of public consensus about protecting our creeks in their natural state.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Richard Schmidt
Page 4
� I
1VAWCePZ1C
acou 'C(L ::-CDD DIR
[3-CAO Er-FIN DIR RED FILE
Di'Aca,o E;-FIRE CHIEF RESPONSE TO: _ MEETING AGENDA
�ATTORNEY u-PW DIR
O-6LER HEAD C7'-REC DI CHF RICHARD SCHMIDT ITEM #
❑ DEPT HEADS G REC DIR DATA
['i u 11.DIR Letter Received October 20, 2003
O SHR DIR
1. Comment Noted. The project is indeed a large issue, although not necessarily
indigestible. We concur that the project does have implications for the City;
however, the project is not that different philosophically from the original "pink
book." :For the City, this project is intended to improve flood protection within
the City limits by creating and maintaining planned flood channels instead of
uncontrolled flooding.
2. Comment noted. The Council has already has held public hearings over the past
three years on the development direction of the water management plan. The
Zone 9 Advisory Committee has been meeting consistently on this project for
over three years and these meeting have been open to public. Public Workshops
have been held periodically on this project and they have been publicized. The
City Council is holding public meeting on the certification of the EIR and
approval of the WMP Program The City Council may wish to hold more than
one meeting if there is cause to discuss specific issues raised in the EIR and in
the WMT Program.
3. Comment noted. The Zone 9 Advisory Committee and their consultants have
spent considerable time in developing maintenance, management, development
design standards and measures to increase flood protection; these have included
substantial best management practices and techniques already in effect elsewhere
in the state and sanctioned by public and private agencies. This could be
considered a radical change from the "pink book" that included out-of--date
techniques and methodologies. The philosophy of the `pink book" has not
changed and that includes the City's policy to treat the creek with environmental
regard and to maintain, manage and enhance the natural characteristics of the
creek and tributaries for the protection of the plants and wildlife as well as
provide additional flood protection for people and property.
4. The engineering consultant conducted watershed-wide:hydro-geologic studies
and modeling to determine the best methods for flood protection, and determined
benefits derived.from management of flooding. The study also included costs
associated with the proposed flood measures and several alternative scenarios
were evaluated. The Zone 9 Advisory Committee studied the alternatives in
detail, presented their findings to the City and County decision makers and the
proposed project was authorized for development into the WIMP Program and
subsequent environmental evaluation.
6. Comment noted.. This is not a "thin wash of green' but rather a thorough
collection of the best management practices available at this time from public and
RECEIVED
Morro Group, Inc. 10-20-03 XII-1
OCT `? 12003
SLO CITY CLERK
private sources. The bypass channel-projects are not a channelization of the
creek but rather a means to avoid major construction and change of natural
conditions within the creek. The bypass channels provide a designated route for
floodway overflow that protects floodway properties from random flood damage.
In addition, the overflow channel projects that are recommended as the capital
improvement projects would be subject to further study and environmental
review prior to implementation, and the DDM and SMMP are designed to
function without these major capital improvement projects.
6. Comment noted. We concur that the best measure is not to build within the
floodplain; however, within the Mid-Higuera area there exists considerable
development that now needs protection from flooding. The object of the Elks
Lane and Los Osos Valley Road bypass channels is to protect areas already
developed. The non-structural improvements are recommended and have not
been removed from the WMT Program. Further protection would require capital
improvements that would be evaluated at the time that they are proposed. It is
speculative at this phase of the planning to determine what the environmental
impacts to the existing conditions would be without a designed project. CEQA
allows evaluation based on the amount of information available at the time of the
review and then "tiers" subsequent reviews as information and plans become
available. This EIR is the first tier and looks at overall planning. A subsequent
EIR would be required on all future capital improvement projects.
7. The.WMP and the EIR does not put the capital improvement projects "front and
center." Just.the opposite. The SMMP is the document that provides the creek
maintenance and management policies and BMPs and sets up the annual work
plan process so that routine maintenance that you want to see take place with
reduced agency permitting. This is the "front and center" project. The capital
improvement projects are delegated "last" in priority and require further design
and review.
Note that the City is required to rescind an existing resolution before replacing it.
The alternative approach would be to amend the resolution, change the language
that is no longer applicable and add the WMT Program to the existing resolution.
Both techniques result in the same product that would be a more up to date and
modern approach to flood protection.
8. We contacted the City with respect to the issue with Old Garden Creek
maintenance (which by the way would require an individual permit from the
ACOE in order to conduct maintenance that could be done without a permit as
part of the annual work program if the WMP Program were in place). The City
indicates that it does not have an easement across many old Garden Creek
properties to maintain the creek. The maintenance is therefore the responsibility
of the homeowner. Please refer to response No. 7, above. Also, refer to Section
4 of the WNM watershed management framework that states eight goals directed
toward"a health stream ecosystem."
Morro Group. Inc. 10-20-03 X11-2
9. Comment noted. This comment has been referred to the City Engineer since it
relates to the resolution being presented. The intent of the WMP is to put the
environmental aspects of the creek first-and-foremost in planning for flood
protection. Please refer to response No.7 above.
10. Comment noted that you wish the City Council to discuss various issues at
separate meetings. This comment is referred to the City Council since it is
procedure and does not relate to content of the EIR
11. The EIR covers the WMP Program, of which the Capital Improvement Projects
are just one issue. The EIR also includes alternatives to the entire program, and
these are summarized in the EIS format in Chapter V, including the No-Action
Alternative.
In 1996, the AC.OE requested a comprehensive plan for the SLO Creek
watershed. As stated in their letter dated May 6, 1996 (Appendix A of the EIS/R),
"the purpose and focus of the comprehensive plan is to ensure that aquatic
resource impacts are first avoided, then minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. The plan shall include a) an analysis of alternatives that meet the
overall project purpose of anticipated flood control needs, b) identification of
habitat quantity.. width and location of habitat fragmentation, and c) mitigation
measures to offset unavoidable adverse impacts."
Until the plan is provided, the ACOE is requiring individual permits for all
actions undertaken in the creek because "it appears that existing bank stabilization
measureshave resulted in substantial fragmentation of habitat, loss of wildlife
movement corridors, sever loss of floodplain values, channel constriction and
incision" (refer to Appendix A of the EIS/R). This statement supports their
contention that another approach to the"pink book" is very desirable.
12. Comment noted. We agree that it is impossible to control all flooding and the
level is not necessarily indicative of the impact. Therefore, flooding is
unavoidable, and cannot be fully mitigated and is thus a significant unavoidable
impact requiring overriding considerations.
13. Comment noted. The hydraulics of-the creek has been modeled and the no
adverse impact policy would be implemented to ensure that there are no upstream
and downstream, unmitigated effects to .property resulting from any change in
hydrology. The capital improvements require further study, including modeling
to determine the hydrologic effects of the proposed improvement.
14. The Mi&Higuera capital improvement project in the WMP Program is not the
same as the mid-Higuera project previously described in the "pink book." The
"pink book" project widened the entire channel from Marsh Street Bridge to Los
Osos Valley Road and removed considerable development adjacent to the banks
Morro Group. Inc. 10-20-03 X11-3
including the Caltrans maintenance yard and the Madonna construction yard.
The proposed capital improvement project is much less invasive and is described
on page N-33. It would provide a terrace along the creek above the 2-year low
line and a by-pass system constructed parallel to, but mostly away from, the
existing creek alignment. It would also include an active vegetation management
program
15. The design of the capital improvement projects would be undertaken by
hydraulic engineers and the effects would be modeled using the approved HEC —
RAS model, consistent with the DDM. The other comments raised in this
discussion would be appropriately a part of further environmental review at the
time the projects are proposed.
16. Economics are not part of an EIR; however, budgets were given as part of the
WMP Program
17. Comment noted. The City Council will most likely clarify their intent at the time
of the approval of the resolution. It is the EIR consultant's opinion, based on the
information contained in the record, that the proposed project is the superior
environmental alternative because it incorporates considerable state-of-the-art
BMPs consistent with state and federal mandates.
Morro Group. Inc. 10-20-03 X11-4
Barbara Ehrbar- Unacceptable Phase II"IMP/EIR _ Page 1
From: Phil Ashley<pashley@calpoly.edu> RED FILE
To: <behrbar@slocity.org>
Date: 10/21/03 2:57PM MEETING AGENDA
Subject: Unacceptable Phase iI WMP/EIR DAT to ZIo3 ITEM #_
To:San Luis Obispo City Council Tuesday, October 21, 2003
From: Phil Ashley 44)?"A
Subject:The unacceptable Phase II Waterway Management Plan and its EIR. COUNCIL 2 CDD DIR
m CAO ErFIN DIR
Dear Mayor&City Councilors: 2f ACRO ZFIRE CHIEF
�/
2rATTORNEY !Li PW DIR
It has been nearly 2 years since I have came to a City Council meeting. 2'CLERK/ORIG Z POLICE CHF
In that time I have been doing neglected things that may again make it 0 DPT HEADS Z REC DIR
medically safe for me to attend stressful Council meetings. I'm not at 8 Z UTIL DIR
that point yet,so I won't be at the Council Hearing tonight on the WMP SHR DIR
and its EIR. But I'm a lot closer than I was 2 years ago to being again
capable of doing public service environmental work. Begrudgingly a
couple of pills (blood pressure, etc.), nonbegrudgingly a self-induced
major diet change (to avoid more recommended pills), and doctor-ordered
overall stress avoidance has really helped. I still believe that
diet/exercise are much better than the pharmacy,although my doctors
have said that's a somewhat yuppie way of looking at it(59 year-old
yuppie, hmmmm). Anyway, I respect the public work that all of you do, so
take care of yourselves.
If I get back into public service in the near future, my two highest
priorities in SLO City will be the environmentally/ecologically
unacceptable (1)combined Draft Conservation/Open Space Element and (2)
the Subject WMP/EIR.The latter is Hearing Item 1 on your Council
Meeting Agenda tonight so I will briefly discuss it here. I admit that I
have not been participating in the Phase II WMP process as part of my
Phase I SMP (stress management plan). But a.Staff advising you far
astray leaves me no choice but to advise you otherwise.
If I understand the Staff Report(SR)correctly,you are being asked by
Staff tonight to certify the WMP EIR and to approve a Statement of
Overriding Considerations (SOC)for Category 3 flood control projects
for San Luis Obispo Creek (page 1.1, no. 1.).Why are you being asked by
Staff to approve a CEQA SOC for Category 3 flood control projects when
the SR states in several places (page 1-5, bullet 3, page 1-86, last
paragraph)that significantly more environmental study is needed for
Category 3 projects? It makes much more sense to determine if any SOC is
necessary ONLY after these additional environmental studies are done for
each Category 3 flood control project. I recommend that you approve no
SOC for the EIR unless the SOC can ONLY be interpreted as meaning the
WMP does not meet the engineering definition of providing 100-year flood
protection and has no other environmental implications whatsoever!
More importantly, you should not certify this Phase II Waterway
Management Plan. It is environmentally horrendous and still needs a lot
of work. For example, the SR on page 1-5 indicates in the second bullet
that"Category 1 and 2 (flood control) activities are anticipated to be
adequately assessed and permitted with the level of review provided by RECEIVED
this Program". I interpret this to mean that based on mitigations
CICT ? zoos
SLO CITY CLERK
[Barbara Ehrbar- Unacceptable Phase IL"'VIP/EIR Page 21
provided in the proposed EIR, Category 1 and 2 flood control projects
have been mitigated to levels of insignificant and cumulatively
insignificant environmental impacts.This cannot be further from the
truth.
I participated in the Phase I WMP process and am knowledgeable of the
so-called "biotechnical" mitigations provided for Category 1 and
Category 2 flood control projects.These biotechnical "mitigations" led
to the partial or in most cases complete destruction of about 10
steelhead pools in SLO Creek without replacement pools being provided. I
have the before and after photographs to prove this.The photographs are
not in a presentation format at this time, but I can prepare them if
needed.
The point is you are being asked to certify a Phase II WMP EIR tonight
with the kinds of "biotechnical mitigations"that the EIR alleges will
reduce environmental impacts to a level of insignificance when in truth
the same types of Category 1 and 2 "biotechnical mitigations"for the
Phase I WMP actually caused significant environmental impacts rather
than reduced them to a.level of insignificance!
Since there were no Category 3 flood control projects in Phase I of the
WMP, I cannot make the same kind of before and after project comparison
as I did immediately above for Category 1 and 2 flood control projects.
But you are being asked by the SR to certify the EIR on your good faith
that the kinds of biotechnical mitigations that led to the destruction
of steelhead and other aquatic and terrestrial species SLO Creek pool
habitats for Phase I will environmentally work for the horrendous
Category 3 CHANNELIZATION flood control projects being proposed for
Phase II in the WMP and EIR. I ask you not to take this leap of good
faith in Staff's and their engineering consultant's faulty environmental
prognostications.
For example,why should you believe Staff and their consultants in the
WMP and EIR that SLO Creek can be horrendously channelized in various
locations without great cause for environmental/ecological concern? You
are being asked in the SR to certify the EIR and then to not worry
because more environmental work will be done later on these Category 3
SLO Creek channelization projects.
There is no reason to believe the results will be any different than
When in the late 1970's SLO City channelized about a mile of SLO Creek
in the vicinity of the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WTP)..
Unfortunately I did not know back then to take before and after
channelization photographs to document the aquatic habitat loss that
took place, but it took place nevertheless, and was a major cumulative
environmental factor in SLO Creek for steelhead ultimately being listed
Federally Threatened.
No one seems to have good photographic evidence or flow evidence (has
the City got such evidence somewhere?) of the perennial water flow
patterns of SLO Creek in this approximately 1 mile channelization zone
of SLO Creek. My visual recollection was/is that prior to channelization
this stretch of SLO Creek had perennial flow similar to upstream
stretches. However, now, this wide channelized stretch is one of the
first stretches of SLO Creek to go completely dry even in average
Barbara Ehrbar Unacceptable Phase II
t .
rain/flow years.
In fact,this channelized stretch goes dry so fast nearly every year,.
that when others and myself asked the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS--now known as NOAA Fisheries)to require SLO City to move its
Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall (outflow) pipe a mile upstream as
mitigation forreduced flows from the.City's Wastewater Reuse project
(WRP), NMFS replied that this channelized stretch of SLO Creek goes dry
so fast nearly every year that it might not be worth the risk of moving
this added Creek flow upstream as it may too quickly disappear in this
channelized stretch.
The City Staff including Public Works can offer any technical
explanation they want to convince others that channelization of SLO
Creek in the WTP vicinity does not contribute to that stretch going dry
faster than other stretches of SLO Creek, and they can make similar
arguments that quicker drying won't happen in stretches of SLO Creek
proposed for channelization in the Phase II WMP/EIR, but the
environmental risk is far too great to believe any such projected
argument they might make on this issue.
So I ask that you do not certify this EIR as long as it has
channelization projects presented at any level other than the lowest
possible alternative.
Also,for many environmental reasons that you should already know about,
please do not certify this EIR as long as it proposes a Dam upstream of
SLO City, unless, as with the channelization projects,it is the lowest
possible alternative presented in the EIR. Sometimes it is important in
EIRs, as in this case,to present lowest level alternatives as dams and
channelization to periodically demonstrate how environmentally and
economically bad and absurd they still are.
To summarize, do not certify this EIR until (1) it can be proven to you
beyond a reasonable doubt that every pool in SLO Creek that exists there
now will exist there after Category 1 and 2 flood control projects are
done or will be enhanced rather than reduced or eliminated as happened
to about 10 pools resulting from Phase I of the WMP, and (2)
channelization and dam projects are moved to the lowest possible
alternative in the EIR for reasons discussed in this letter.
Finally, if you certify this Phase II WMP EIR with Category 3 flood
control channelization and dam projects as high alternatives and with
Category 1 and 2.flood control steelhead pool-destroying "biotechnical
mitigations",you will fall from your role as environmental leader in
the County. As a SLO City resident, I for one do not want that to
happen.
Sincerely, Phil Ashley
CC: "pashley@calpoly.edu" <pashiey@calpoly.edu>