Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/03/2004, BUS 1 - 2003 ANNUAL TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT council- DiAugust 3,2004 j acEnaa REpoiA "° a CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPOYr/�,,,st� FROM: Michael McCluskey,Public Works Director Prepared By: Timothy Scott Bochum,Deputy Director Public Works Jake Daniel Hudson,Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: 2003 ANNUAL TRAFFIC SAFETY/REPORT CAO RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive the 2003 Annual Traffic Safety Report and associated mitigation strategies. REPORT IN BREIF As part of the City's Traffic Safety Program, the Public Works Department has completed the third annual Traffic Safety Report (TSR). The TSR reviews all intersections and street segments in the City for collision rates and patterns for calendar year 2003. Based on these patterns, recommendations are made for altering or monitoring the five most critical locations of each intersection and street segment classification. Of these locations the most notable are: Laurel at Orcutt, Madonna at Pereira, Chorro at Pismo, Buena Vista at Garfield, Bishop at Johnson, El Mercado at Madonna, and Osos at Pacific. This year the TSR has been expanded to include a comprehensive analysis of bicycle and pedestrian collision types and patterns at high collision locations. DISCUSSION The collision data and corresponding analysis have been compiled and completed by the Public Works Department in July of 2004. The TSR identifies patterns at the five highest collision rate locations of similar classification. For example, all arterial segments are compared to each other to establish the prime locations that will potentially receive mitigation or safety improvements. The analysis technique utilizes an advanced collision records software suite that aids in the determination of collision patterns and potential corrective measures. In order to determine if corrective measures could reduce the likeliness of a collision type identified in the pattern, staff conducted a comprehensive review including a survey of the physical field conditions and travel behavior. The significance of an intersection's "collision rate" is that it is a "normalized" indicator when comparing intersections or street segments. The more vehicles entering the intersection, the more likely a collision is to occur. The collision rate is the ratio between the volume of vehicles and the number of collisions. Collision rates are used by police departments to target traffic enforcement and by engineers to establish traffic safety mitigation measures. Collision statistics within this report are based on actual police reports. The TSR makes twenty-two recommendations to improve traffic safety at these high collision rate locations. Of these twenty-two recommendations, fourteen low cost measures have already been I ' Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 2 implemented or are in the process of being implemented, two high cost measures are carried over from previous years and are currently under construction or design, three high cost measures are part of planned future improvement projects, and three high cost measures will require further funding as recommended in the fiscal analysis section of this report. Key tables and figures excerpted from the TSR provide a valuable insight to trends and results of our previous actions. Analysis Results &Safety Trends Figure 3.1 shows a five-year comparison of total traffic collisions that have been reported within the City. Although traffic collisions have been on an upward trend in San Luis Obispo for the past four years, in 2003 the number of reported collisions actually dropped and was the lowest in the three years of the traffic safety program. There were 1,092 total collisions reported in 2003, 13% lower than 2002 and 4% lower than 2001. Figure 3.1 -Fere Year CoDision Trend 1300 - i i 1200 1,142 � 1100 1.092 - � 1.025 1000 870 � 900 t 800 - i 700 1989 2000 200' 1 2002 2003 Safety Program Begins While this is certainly exciting news, variations in collision occurrences are typical. Only through future years analysis will we fully determine effectiveness of recently installed safety mitigation. However, we can say with certainty that some corrective actions are occurring within our right of way based upon the reversal in upward trend in collision occurrence. Figure 3.2 shows trends of five-year injury collisions. Injury collisions, the focus of traffic safety, were down by a small percentage (0.6%) in 2003 as compared to 2002 but were still up by 13% as compared to 2001. Injury collisions as a percentage of all collisions have historically been on the rise, up by 3% from 2002 and by 4% from 2001. This is expected, since the overall number of collisions dropped for 2003 and yet the injury collisions were close to 2002 levels. Traffic collisions resulting in fatalities occur randomly and generally do not occur only at intersections with high collision rates; rather they are usually the result of unique situations and conditions (including driver error) and often may not represent typical conditions correctible by mitigation. Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 3 Figure 3.2-Five Year Injury Collision 350 - 309 307 300 250 240 200 , 150 , , 100 , 50 ' , 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Safety Prate Begins A high collision rate is generally indicative of deficient roadway conditions that may be correctable by mitigation or alteration but precluding a fatality is difficult to quantify. As such, fatality analysis should not be the sole focus for safety mitigation. However, traffic fatalities are often high profile incidents that receive the most attention from the public, media and Council. Over the past five years the City has averaged one and a half fatalities per year. On a very positive note there were no traffic related fatalities on City streets in 2003. Table 3.2 compares injuries and fatalities by year to demonstrate this point. Table 3:2-City-wide Annual Injury and Fatal Collisions Year Total Injury %Change %of Total Fatal %Change Collisions Collisions Collisions 1999 240 - 26.37 2 - 2000 269 +12.08 26.24 2 0 2001 265 -1.5 23.26 1 -50 2002 _ 309 1 +16.60 124.66 1 1 10 2003 307 1 -0.6 1 28.11 1 0 1 100 2002 Traffic Safety Report: Completed Safety Improvements As a result of the 2002 Annual Traffic safety report, various safety improvements were implemented. Last year's traffic safety report recommended implementation of numerous mitigation strategies throughout the City. To date, 9 pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, 5 intersection configuration and control improvements, 4 sight distance improvements, and 2 roadway configuration improvements have been completed. Attachment 1 contains a full listing of these improvements. Three significant capital projects are currently in design and will be implemented 1 ' ?) Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 4 later this year.They are: Signalization.of Broad Street/Pacific Street Signal Modification Marsh Street/Santa Rosa Signal Modification Marsh Street/Osos Street Bicycle&Pedestrian Safety Review—A new Focus Even though the Public Works Traffic Engineering Section has been understaffed for quite some time, this year's Traffic Safety report has been expanded to include a more comprehensive analysis of pedestrian and bicycle collisions. It is anticipated that in future years these areas will receive more thorough analysis. Table 4.1 shows an annual comparison of total pedestrian collisions while Attachment 2 shows specific pedestrian collision information as identified in the safety report for the types of collisions that occurred., Table 4.1 —2003 Pedestrian Collisions Total Reported Year Pedestrian Collisions on Public Streets Pedestrian % Change 1999 24 2000 37 +54% 2001 19 -49% 2002 . 41 +54% 2003 24 -41% Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database Although pedestrian collisions were down in 2003, pedestrian collisions have been on an upward trend over the past five years. There were 24 pedestrian related collisions reported in 2003, 41% lower than the previous 12 month period and 21% higher than collisions reported in 2001. In general, bicycle collisions have also been on an upward trend over the past five years. There were 54 total bicycle related collisions reported in 2003, 3.7% higher than the previous 12 month period and 11% higher than collisions reported in 2001. Table 4.4 shows an annual comparison of total bicycle collisions while Attachment 3 shows specific bicycle collision information as identified in the safety report for the types of collisions that occurred. Bicycle collisions have stayed fairly steady (there was a slight rise in the last three years) with an annual occurrence usually fluctuating near the fifty(50) per year mark. Although pedestrian and bicycle collisions have been increasing over the past few years, these collisions are often difficult to mitigate. This is because they are primarily non-correctable incidents attributed to cyclist, driver, and/or pedestrian negligence; inattention or error. 1 r 1 J Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 5 Table 4.4-2= Bicycle Collisions Total Reported Year Bicycle Collisions on Public Streets Bicycle %Change 1999 52 - 2000 46 -12% 2001 45 -2% 2002 52 +13% 2003 54 +3.7% Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database To combat this phenomenon the Public Works Department is investigating a public education campaign involving such forms of media as public service announcements (PSA's) on channel 20. These PSA's will address the predominant bicycle and pedestrian collision types and how to avoid them. Mitigation Strategies Mitigation strategies for the high collision rate.locations for 2003 are identified in Section 6 of the 2003 Traffic Safety Report. Many of the mitigation measures are relatively low cost traffic improvements, such as installation of additional signing and striping and are currently being implemented by staff. Some of the notable locations and recommended mitigations include: Location Ranking Mitigation/Notes Laurel/Orcutt 1 —A/A The intersection is part of the widening project for Orcutt Intersection Road .that includes signalization. Unfortunately State funding for half of the project has been delayed. Other interim improvements may be necessary if State funds are delayed further. Madonna/Pereira 1-A/L This intersection has been in the top five the last two years. Recent improvements including foliage trimming and pedestrian restrictions. Implementing more significant mitigation (including turning restrictions) may be necessary if trends continue. Will need to program CIP in next FY 2005-07 Financial Plan. Chorro/Pismo 1 A/C Intersection remains problematic. Parking removal needed for increased sight distance. Redevelopment on corner may provide additional improvements including bulb- outs. Buena Vista/Garfield 1 —L/L Pattern attributable to offset intersections and Cal Poly students avoiding queue at NB 101/ Grand Off Ramp. Reconfigure intersections to channelized flow. May need future significant CIP. Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 6 Bishop/Johnson 1 - Other Permissive collisions occurring in the NB direction. Install Protected movements. El Mercado/Madonna 3 - Other Continued WB collision pattern for LT traffic. Need to improve signal head visibility. Will need to program CIP in next FY 2005-07 Financial Plan. Osos/Pacific 5 Other Right angle collisions occurring Investigate improving intersection with bulb-outs or modified traffic flow. May need to program CIP in next FY 2005-07 Financial Plan. Notes: A-Arterial, C- Collector, L- Local, O- Other types (not in high rate list) CONCURRENCES San Luis Police Department has reviewed the 2003 Annual Traffic Safety Report and concurs with its findings. FISCAL IMPACT Most of the mitigation strategies identified the 2003 Traffic Safety Report will be funded from the FY 2003-2005 Financial Plan through the allocation of$35,000 annually for safety related purposes in FY 2004-05. However, there are three "higher" cost.mitigation strategies that will cost more than currently exists in the adopted budget. These three projects include reconfiguration of Madonna and El.Mercado traffic signal, visibility improvements (bulbout installation) at Osos and Pacific, and intersection reconfiguration of Madonna and Pereira. These projects will need to secure additional funding in the upcoming Financial Plan for FY 2005-07. Current estimates for these projects are: Project Preliminary Estimate Madonna/El Mercado Signal Improvement $18,000 Madonna/Pereira Intersection improvements $35,04 Osos/Pacific VisibilityImprovements $45, 000 Unless staff is directed otherwise, these improvements will compete for limited resources (other CIP and operation programs) for funding in the upcoming Financial Plan prioritization process. In addition to thesethree projects, staff also believes that there is likelihood that at least two locations (Higuera/Granada and Johnson/Ella) may receive recommendations for signalization based upon development occurring near their locations. These improvements would need to be constructed by the City (they are cumulative in nature and not attributable to any one project) and as such,will also be requested for funding in the Financial Plan process. �f Council Agenda Report—2003 Annual Safety Report Page 7 It is important to note that this engineering safety program is in its third year of operation and in order for it to continue to be successful, a prolonged commitment both financially and through staff resources is necessary to properly implement safety mitigation and reduce collisions. Similar to the Pavement Management program, annual expenditure commitments will be necessary (even in difficult financial times) if it is the goal of our City and community to improve traffic and pedestrian and bicycle safety along our roadways. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue item with direction to staff. Attachments Attachment I —2003 Completed Traffic Safety Improvements Attachment 2-Pedestrian Collision Types 2001 through 2003 Attachment 3 -Bicycle Collision Types 2001 through 2003 A copy of the 2003 Annual Traffic Safety Report has been transmitted to Council members under a separate memorandum. Copies of the 2003 Annual Traffic Safety Report are available for review at the City Clerk's Office in City Hall (990 Palm Street), the Public Works Department (955 Morro Street), and online at W W W.SLOCITY.ORG. IMCouncil Agenda Reports\2004 agenda reports\Transportation and Development Review (Bochum)\Traffic Engineering(TBA)\2003 Traffic Safety Report CAR.doc I — ATTACHMENT 1 Completed Traffic Safety Improvements Each year the Traffic Engineering Section implements traffic safety improvement projects through a variety of programs and projects. These improvements are usually stand-alone projects but are often times included in other City CIP projects or as part of individual land development projects. The following notable traffic safety improvements were completed in 2003: ➢ Pedestrian& Bicycle Facility ➢ Sight Distance Improvements Improvements I. Santa Rosa & Buchon: Extended Red 1. Story&Sandercock:Upgraded crosswalk per the Curb city crosswalk policy. 2. Prefumo Canyon & Hedley: Extended 2. Orcutt&McMillian:Installed Crosswalk across Red Curb McMillian. 3. Islay&Osos:Removed Parking 3. Orcutt&Duncan:Installed Crosswalk across 4. Dalidio & Madonna: Installed Red Duncan. Curb 4. Balboa Street:Installed Pedestrian loading zone for CL Smith School 5. Johnson(San Luis Dr.to Orcutt):Installed Bike Lane Stencils 6. Santa Rosa(Walnut to Monterey):Installed Bike Lane Stencils 7. Laurel&Orcutt:Improved crosswalk configuration 8. Chorro&Higuera:Installed pedestrian signal heads 9. Handicapped.Ramp Program—Installations Citywide ➢ Signing&Striping Configuration ➢ Roadway Improvements Improvements 1. Pismo Street: Paved & restriped from 1. Peach&Toro:Installed All=Way Stop Control Broad to Walker 2. Sierra&Ella: Installed 2-Way Stop Control 2. Elks Lane: Modified to create 901 3. High & Broad: Installed dedicated right tum and intersection at Higuera Street through left 4. Laurel & Orcutt: Improved delineation and crosswalk configuration installed 5. Fredericks & Albert: Installed All-Way Stop Control ATTACHMENT 2 Pedestrian Collision Types 2001 through 2003 Pedes6ianCoffisionType 2001 % 2002 % 2003 % Signal 8 42% 14_ 34% 6 25% Out of Crosswalk-_Midblock 3 16% 13 32% 7 29% Uncontrolled - Unmarked Crosswalk N/A 0% N/A 0% N/A 0% Major/Collector Uncontrolled - Unmarked Crosswalk N/A 0% N/A 0% N/A 0% Local Uncontrolled-Marked 1 1 5% 3 7% N/A 0% Not in Road Sidewalk N/A 0% 2 5% N/A 0% In Road not crossing) 2 11% 2 5% 3 12% Stop-Marked Crosswalk 1 5% 3 7% 4 17% Stop-Unmarked Crosswalk 4 21% 4 10% 4 17% Total: jrml9mmmm7l00% 141 1 100% 124 1 100% Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database l —r ATTACHMENT O N Q O r N N r r r r O O r r O O `N.r d N r A � W > O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O 0 lL y EO O (`7 47 R 10 O fh r r R M r M V C N v c O M m O (D V r V N r O i0 10 N r R to :a)O O CL N Y N fC Ud• O O O O N O O O O r O O r O O v Q U p 05 M ^ G c \ \ \ \ o e e o o 0 e o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O F O r r r r 0 r O t0 O CO CO f0 t0 r O . OO r r r r O n aD aC N N �0 c0 V 0 N C \ �ri = r n ci r of of ui o Oe 7 O � � 0 = C7 CO CO f0 CD r N r �- 10 t0 M r t? � L. U r Zo Q Von U U_ y N m a a)^ M O W J T O C CL O L W U 0 O m 07 i. m w 3 y ; y O T ` O U d' J > LO O (V r a? o rn o 'c «? _ U C c R 0 C Y C o .0 �0N ' pO 'O 0 U O t_ O Go d2L0 li ° 0 Em c c m F �• V o 3 F F J c o >u o c E oc c •ma� -E� R J F- y o 20 Q a QQLL O co O O 0 Z n O 0 0 > OJ J 0 O) O o N c � > O 0 O U