HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/01/2005, COMMUNICATION#3 - LEGISLATIVE ACTION PLATFORM EXCERPT ��IIIIIIII����������IIIIIIIIIIII�
Council MEMORANDUM
Cit of San Luis Obispo
RECEIVED
DATE: March 1, 2005. MAR 0 1 2CO;j
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council SLO CITY CLERK
FROM: Jonathan Lowell, City Attorney G
VIA: Ken Hampian, City Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Legislative Action Platform Excerpt
To aid in considering Council member Mulholland's request to modify the language of item 56 of the
Council's Legislative Action Platform,attached is a page from the Council's recently adopted
platform. Item 56 is circled at the bottom.
Attachment
RED FILE
l our:ci_ %_,D DIR ME ING AGENDA
2'CAO O PIN DIR
MACAO =IRE CHIEF DATE � Ilk ITEM #
IZ'ATTORNE`! PW DIR 3 -
ra'CLERKORIG POLICE CHF
"DEPT HEADS ;�RECDIR
J ;,-�,UTIL DIR
j �-iR DII�
C:\DOCUME—I\slouser\.LOCALS—I\Temp\GW V iewerUZEDFIL-1.DOC
Exhibit A..,..:
43. Supporting actions to: (1)promote cooperation and mutual support between metropolitan planning
organization(MPO)agencies and local transit providers, and(2)discourage trends toward MPO
agencies/regional"control"of local transit providers
LJTIT Tl`IFS
44. Supporting clean water funding programs
45. Supporting legislation to facilitate recycling program development and enhance local government's
ability to comply with solid waste requirements
46. Supporting legislation to eliminate mandatory penalties for violations of NPDES Requirements and
returning discretionary control to the Regional Water Quality Control Board Executive Officers
(i.e.repeal SB 709)
47. Supporting legislation promoting the safe,responsible,and cost-effective reuse of Exceptional
Quality biosolids
48. Supporting legislation to streamline the state regulatory processes
49. Supporting sustainable energy programs
50. Supporting legislation allowing citieslagencies to establish fees for the costs of operating mandated
water quality programs such as,but not limited to,municipal storm water and total maximum daily
loading
51. Supporting federal legislative action to transfer Salinas Reservoir properties to a local agency
52. Supporting legislation that aids in the implementation of the California Urban Water
Conservation Council's Best.Management Practices regarding urban water conservation
COUNTY/REGIONAL PRIORITIES
53. Developing consistency between the City and County General Plans,particularly to emphasize the
concepts that: (1)the County should be discouraged from approving additional urban development
within the City's urban reserve line, (2)urban development should not occur beyond the City's
urban reserve line,and(3)unincorporated areas should remain rural,agricultural,or open space in
character
54. Continuing to encourage the County Board of Supervisors to place a measure before voters that
would create a vector control program benefit assessment program.for San Luis Obispo County
55. Encouraging participation by County in providing nearby parking for County employees and
clients,and alternate transportation and parking demand reduction
(gregi
upporting County development of a local ordinance providing additional local oversight and
lation of the land application of Exceptional Quality biosolids