HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/06/2005, C1 - REVISIONS TO AUGUST 16 AND 23, 2005 MINIUTES s
r�
IIIIIIIIiI ���I��I�IDIIIIIIIIiII
council memomn. Oum
7.
Ci bf Sin Luis ow6 a
RECEIVED
September 6, 2005 `ip 0 2UU5
TO: Mayor Romero & Members of the City Council SLO CITY CLERK
FROM: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk(,'
VIA: Ken Hampian, CAO
SUBJECT: Revisions to August, 16 and 23, 2005 Minutes
The following revisions to the minutes have been proposed by Mayor Romero and Council
Member Mulholland. If Council concurs, the motion should reflect that these revisions will be
made.
Auoust_16,2005
Page C1-6 = Added following clarifying comment after the motion on the Tree Committee
recommendation:
Council Member Settle and Mayor Romer_o opposed the motion on the basis that
the trees should not be removed at all.
Page C1-6 - Added a reference to San Luis Creek under Mr. Brown's comments.
Brad Brown, San Luis Obispo, complimented Council on the addition of the bike
lane on Pismo Street and the City's work on San Luis Creek GFeek-prior to the
rains.
Page C1-9 - Revised the last sentence of the motion to clarify what was meant by the "20=
foot driveways."
Council also asked that the ARC consider the addition of a split rail fence
adjacent-to the open space area for the purpose of protecting the creek setback
area, and driveways with a minimum length of 2 feet to the back
of the sidewalk to allow adequate area for vehicle parking
I yc COUNCIL z CDD D!7
L CAO � FIN DIP I RED FILE f�ACAO F- =IRE CHIEF
ATTORNEY 9; PW DIR
CLERKORIG � POLICE CHF MEETING AGENDA
❑ DEPT HEADS ,/Z P=C DIP ®.4T E 9 & o TEM 4 C�_--
II FuTLDR
Auqust 23, 2005
Page C1=12 - amended Council Member Mulholland's comments as follows:
Council Member Mulholland explained that, although she thinks the RASP
contains some good policies,she does not.think the Unocal property should be
annexed and that there are seven se 'erab/e significant and unavoidable.
environmental impacts for which she cannot make Aqwfindings. She also
opposed the Plan,because it will be growth-inducing, will add to the
jobs/housing imbalance, and the County will continue to build on the City's
borders.
Page C1-13 -Amended Council Member Mulholl.and's comments as follows:
Council Member Mulholland expressed concern regarding the height of the
buildings, overloading the narrow streets and infrastructure, increased traffic
and the possible loss of the uniqueness ofthe downtown as new projects are
developed She said that there is a need for a cumulative impact study of the
downtown as well as an environmental impact report. She discussed the value
of going out to bid on this property. She said she doesn't think a three-story
parking-lolara -e should be in the middle of the downtown core 4'0�'
Page C1-17 -The following paragraph wa.s clarified by adding the word "future" prior to
"development plans:"
Pamela jardini, Planning Solutions and representing Dan Duval A9,9s,4, and Carol
Florence, representing Congregation Beth-David, said thereate no future
development plans on these properties, but they wanted this area to be included.
In addition, staff added a resolution number and made other minor clerical/grammatical
changes.
GA301-04 Minutes\Corrections to Minutes 08-16-05 and 08-23-05 .doc
2