Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/20/2005, C4 - MID HIGUERA WIDENING, SPECIFICATION NO. 90073B AMENDMENT #2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONTRACT council `uft °'9/20/2005 j, acEn& Repout N C CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO FROM: Jay D. Walter;Director of Public Work Prepared By: Daniel Van Beveren, Ass ciate Engineer SUBJECT: MID HIGUERA WIDENING, SPECIFICATION NO. 90073B AMENDMENT#2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CONTRACT CAO RECOMMENDATION Approve and execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement to Furnish Environmental Services for the Mid-Higuera Widening Project, Specification No. 90073B; in the amount of: $24,802 with Morro Group, Inc. DISCUSSION The Mid Higuera Widening project involves the widening of Higuera Street from Marsh Street to High Street. Cal Trans is the agency in charge of processing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) approval of this project, and in.2003, requested several technical reports necessary to process this environmental clearance. The City then contracted with Morro Group, Inc., a local environmental consultant, to complete these technical reports. The current agreement with Morro Group consists of the original contract awarded by Council on November 5; 2003, and a contract amendment which was approved by the CAO on March 3i;2004. All of the technical reports originally requested have now been completed and submitted to Cal Trans for approval.. One of the technical reports is an Archaeological Survey Report. This report includes preliminary "surveying of the site and has concluded that there is a possible presence of archaeological artifacts or other similar items located within the area of potential disturbance for the street widening. Based on the conclusions of this report, Cal Trans is requiring that.a follow up study, known as an Extended Phase I Archaeological Survey, be performed. This Extended Phase I Archaeological Survey was not included in the original scope of work contracted to Morro Group. Morro Group has submitted a proposal to perform this additional work at a cost of$24,802. FISCAL IMPACT There is $300,000 budgeted for the environmental review phase of this project. Of that amount, $174,400 is still available. This amendment would increase Morro Group's contract.amount by $24, 802 for a total contract value of$129,382. ATTACHMENT; Amendment#2, including proposal from Morro Group for Extended Phase I Archaeological Survey as Exhibit A L\-Council Agenda Reports\M agenda reports\Engineering and Maintenance Services(Lynch)\Capital Projects Design (Lynch)\90073 Mid Higuera Env Services Contract Amendment#2.doc Cil-� Amendment No. 2 To the Agreement to Furnish.Environmental Services For the Mid Higuera Widening Under Specification No. 90073B 1. The scope of work for the agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and MORRO GROUP,INC. dated December 2. 2003 shall be amended to include the following task: a. Extended Phase I Archaeological Survey This additional task represents a cost increase of the Environmental Services Contract in the amount of$24,802, including contingencies, September per a,proposal dated. 2005 froth MORRO GROUP,INC., which is incorporated into this amendment as Exhibit A. 2. All other terms and conditions of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect. For the City of San Luis Obispo: For MORRO GROUP INC.: City Administrative Officef- date date Approved as to Form y September 2, 2005 SEP 6 2005 (�f Vii; U mom Mr. Dan Van Beveren Associate Engineer GR"mc. City of San Luis Obispo Environmental Services 955 Morro Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SUBJECT: Proposal for Extended Phase I Cultural Resources Study, Mid-Higu&a Widening Project Dear Dane Thank you for considering theMorfo Group, Inc. project team for the preparation of the Toi Extended Phase I Cultural Resources Study for the Mid-Fliguera Widening Project.. Garcia and Associates (GANDA), a member of the project team, is well.qualified to conduct the Extended Phase I Cultural Resources Study; their scope of work is attached. The cost estimate given for this work effort is a fixed fee of$24,802. This scope of work has been approved by Kelda Wilson of Caltrans to. meet FHWA requirements for the extended phase I work effort. GANDA is ready to start on this work effort Upon authorization to proceed .by the City. Please let me know when out contract is amended and we will set up a time Schedule with GANDA to complete the work effort. If you have any questions.regarding this request, please contact me at (805) 5454095 x103. Sincerely, Moi.Ro GROUP, INC. Mary B. Re IS President Attachment: GANDA scope of work and cost estimate C Ll— 3 1422 MONTEREY STREET,SurrE C200 • SAN Luis OBISPO,CA 93401 - (805)543-7095 - FAX 543-2367 EXE1h TA PROPOSAL FOR EXTENDED PHASE .1 SURVEY AT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE MHWP-01 AND APN 002-482-02615 MID-HIGUERA STREET WIDENING PROJECT, SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Morro Group 1422 Monterey Street, Ste..C200 . San Luis Obispo, California and Gary Ruggerone,Environmental Branch Chief Department of.Transportation District 5 San Luis Obispo, California Prepared by: - Garcia and Associates 104 South C Street, Ste. G Lompoc, California August.2004 revised;March 2005 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................2 2.1 Undertaking Location and Description................................................................2 2.2 Section 106 Compliance..........................................................................................2 23 Site Descriptions...................................................................................................... 3 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK....................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Extended Phase I Survey Methodology—MHWP-01.......................................... 5 3.2 Extended Phase I Survey Methodology—APN 002-482-026 ..............................6 4.0 LABORATORY AND DATA ANALYSIS................................................................. 8 5.0 NATIVE AMERICAN COORDINATION..................................................................9 6.0 CURATION..................................................................................................................9 7.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL............................................................................................ 10 8.0 REPORTS AND DELIVERABLES........................................................................... 10 9.0 TIMETABLE.................:............................................................................................. 11 10.0 REFERENCES CITED............................................................................................. 12 Proposal—Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 C�-5 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following Extended Phase I Survey proposal describes the details of the extended survey proposed for the Mid-Higuera Street Widening project in San Luis Obispo, California. There are two objectives for the Extended Phase I Survey proposal. The first is to determine the boundaries of archaeological site MHWP-01 (temporary designation) relative to the direct Area of Potential Effects (APE), and to characterize the marine shell in the cultural deposit. The second purpose is to reveal if buried prehistoric,or historic cultural deposits exist within the direct APE of an undeveloped parcel (APN 002-482- 027). Archaeological site MHWP-01 was located during the cultural resources inventory by Garcia and Associates (GANDA) for the Mid-Higuera Street Widening project in San Luis Obispo, California (Denardo 2004). The survey will establish whether intact subsurface deposits or features exist within the project's direct APE and it will determine the nature of the marine shell identified in the deposit. The survey will delineate the site boundaries within the direct APE so a detem-iination can be made if the proposed project would impact the resource. If the project, as proposed, will impact the site, the delineation will assist in exploring other options, if necessary, for avoidance. The Extended Phase I Survey. will also determine if marine shell observed at the site represents prehistoric or historic occupation. Archaeological site.MHWP-01 was located during the cultural resources inventory by Garcia and Associates (GANDA) on May 15, 2004. In addition, during a supplemental survey outside the study area on December 22, 2004, historic artifacts and marine shell (Creek Bank Profile Location 1), were observed eroding from the east bank of San Luis Obispo Creek, at APN 002-482-027, extending to a depth of 2.5 meters. A second cultural deposit of mostly modem refuse (Creek Bank Profile Location 3), with some possible historic artifacts and marine shell, was identified at the western edge of APN 003-711-024, behind a garage near the south end of the study area. The eroding artifacts were observed to extend from the top of the creek bank to the waterline, a distance of 3.5 meters. In both instances, the cultural deposits were outside the limits of the project's study area and direct APE (Area of Potential Effects). However, it is uncertain if they represent localized dumping along the stream bank, or if they demonstrate the propensity for cultural deposits buried in alluvium or fill within the project area. The alluvial flat in the area of the creek bank profiles is heavily disturbed through modern development. However, APN 002482-026, which adjoins APN 002- 482-027, is largely undeveloped and displays the most potential for subsurface cultural deposits. The extended survey will determine the presence or absence of cultural materials within this parcel. No other archaeological sites were identified within the APE. Proposal-Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,-2004, revised March 2005 C 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Undertaking Location and Description The proposed road widening will take place along Higuera Street in San Luis Obispo, California. The proposed project would create an 86-foot wide right-of-way (ROW) by widening the existing 60-foot Mguera Street ROW by approximately 26 feet between Marsh Street and 185 feet south of High Street, a distance of approximately 1,181 linear feet (360 meters). The proposed ROW is six feet wider than the previously adopted 80- foot setback line for the corridor: The additional 26 feet would allow two additional travel lanes and a landscaped median to limit driveway access and cross=traffic along Higuera Street, safely accommodate left turns for standard vehicles and trucks, and add landscaping to beautify the corridor. Included in the ROW are four 11-foot travel lanes, a 14-foot wide landscaped median, two 5-foot bikeways, and two 8-foot sidewalks. The intersection of Mguera Street with Pacific Street would be realigned to create a standard perpendicular intersection approach with new curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements. WalkerStreet would be closed and made into a cul-de-sac to allow for future construction of a pedestrian plaza. The maximum depth of excavation is expected to be less than one foot to level surfaces to the depth of the existing street. The proposed project will require relocation or demolition of several properties along the western side of Higuera Street. The Craftsman residence at 292 Higuera Street (APN 002-482-015) will not be removed for this project. The widening will require removal of landscaping and relocation of a few mobile homes. The City of San Luis Obispo is sponsoring the Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project. The project will be funded with local and federal transportation funds, with financial assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, and oversight by the Caltrans Local Assistance Program. 2.2 Section 106 Compliance Because the proposed Mid-Higuera Street Widening project will utilize federal funds, it is considered an undertaking (per 36 CFR 800[y]) subject to the authority of federal and state historic preservation law. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires that project proponents assist the administration in meeting its obligations under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, to consider project effects on historic properties pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA and its implementing regulations found in 36 CFR 800. The proposed Extended Phase I Survey will facilitate compliance requirements of 36 CFR 800.4(b) by providing accurate information on the location of historic properties.. Proposal—Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2605 CLI- 7 The purpose of the Extended Phase I Survey is to define site lirnits relative to the direct project effects; and to determine the presence/absence of a subsurface cultural deposit. The Extended Phase I Survey will determine if intact or disturbed cultural deposits exist within the direct APE. Detailed site boundaries are required to guide proposed project design,and resource management decisions (Caltrans 2001:5-6). 2.3 Site Descriptions ➢ MHWP-01 No previously recorded archaeological sites were identified within the project area during a record search at the Central Coast Information Center (CCIC) of the Historic Resource Inventory System (CHRIS) at the University of California, Santa Barbara on April 26, 2004. However; GANDA recorded archaeological site MHWP-01 (temporary designation)during an intensive pedestrian survey on May 14; 2004. The site consists of a historic midden or trash dump in the front and side yard of the Craftsman-style house at 292 Higuera Street; surface artifacts extend into the direct area of potential effects. Concentrations of marine shell, glass, and historic ceramics are visible on the ground surface surrounding the house, but the cultural deposit appears to predate the existing building (e.g., blue transferware ceramic ca. late 1800s). It is probable that the marine shell associated with the midden is historic; however, the shell could also represent a prehistoric component. The back yard of the 292 Higuera Street residence was not surveyed; however; that area is outside the direct APE. In addition, paved areas and dense lawn areas at the neighboring parcels prevented a more definitive delineation of site boundaries. No artifacts were collected during the archaeological pedestrian survey. Pertinent archaeological site information and artifact descriptions are recorded on DPR 523 Primary and Archaeological Site record forms, and a sketch map is provided that depicts the presently known site boundaries. Extended Phase 1 Testing will determine the nature of the shell in the deposit. In a separate historic resources study for this project, the extant Craftsman-style house was determined not to be eligible:for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP); however, the building is not slated for demolition (Merriam 2004; Monreal, pers. com. 2005). Historic background research revealed that prior to construction of the Craftsman-style house at 292 Higuera Street an earlier house occupied approximately the same location (Sanborn map 1891). By 1873, Eustacio (Anistachio, Austachio) Sesena (Sesinai Secenia) owned the parcel at 56 (292) Higuera Street. The property extended west from Higuera Street to San Luis Obispo Creek '(Harris & Lakin 1873). An 1877 oblique drawing of San Luis Obispo depicts a single building with an ample setback on Mr. Proposal=Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 Sesena's lot (Glover 1877). Mr..Sesena was a resident of San Luis Obispo from as early as 1860, and was married and had a family there by 1869, so it is plausible that he resided at that same location at an earlier date. Mr.. Sesena was bom in California 1840; his father emigrated from Mexico and his mother was Native American. His wife, Refugia Villa De Sesena, was full-blooded Native American (U.S. Census Records 1860, 1870). In 1880, Anistachio Sesena was employed as a teamster, and Mrs. Sesena engaged in housekeeping (U.S. Census 1880). In 1891, a humble dwelling, belonging to Mr. Sesena, is indicated at 56(292) Higuera Street (Sanborn 1891): In 1901, Refugia Sesena shared the property with her four children, and the family members were employed as laborers and servants(City and County Directory 1901). In 1911, Mrs. Sesena transferred the southern half of the property (Lot D) to Mary Fogarty (Assessors Map Book 1900-1949). Within the next few years, the former residence was replaced by a home of Craftsman styling. Constructed in about the same location as the former structure, the new dwelling retained the same liberal setback (Sanborn Map Co. 1926). ➢ Creek Bank Profile Locations On December 22, 2004, GANDA conducted a supplemental cursory survey along San Luis Obispo Creek to examine soils in profile along the east bank to determine if there is a potential for unearthing subsurface cultural deposits within the APE. Historic artifacts, marine shell, and some modern debris were found eroding from the east bank of San Luis Obispo Creek south of Marsh Street behind parcel 002-482-027. The cultural deposit was designated Creek Bank Profile Location 1. During the initial pedestrian survey, no corresponding artifacts were noted on the ground surface within the parcel, including the area of direct impact, but visibility was limited because paved surfaces and commercial development occupy most of the parcel . Creek Bank Profile Location 2 displayed alluvial sediments from the.tetrace bank to the waterline at APN 002-482-015; but no cultural materials were observed. A mixture of automotive refuse with historic artifacts and marine shell (Creek Bank Profile Location 3) was noted behind a garage at the edge of the creek bank at APN 003- 711-024. During the initial pedestrian survey, commercial development in this parcel (comprising buildings and paved surfaces within the area of direct impact) precluded an examination of the ground surface. The prospect of recovering intact deposits at this parcel is low due to the high level of development. Of the remaining parcels on the west side of the Mid-Higuera Street project area, only one (APN 002-482-026) remains undeveloped and has the most potential for subsurface archaeological deposits. No artifacts were identified at this parcel during the pedestrian survey, but it is possible that alluvium or modem fill has buried or obscured artifacts that may exist within the expanse of this undeveloped flat. APN 002-482-026 belonged to W. Proposal—Extended Phased Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 C ���. G. Archer in 1873 (Harris, & Lakin 1873) and it is likely that nearby Archer Street was named in his honor. No buildings are depicted on the parcel in 1877 (Glover 1877);but by 1888, a single story dwelling existed on the lot (Sanborn 1888). Three years later, a lot line is indicated, but the dwelling is absent (Sanborn 1891). By 1926, an auto repair business (402 Higuera Street), a stone cutting facility (354 Higuera. Street), and an automobile garage are present on the parcel (Sanborn 1926). In 1950, only the garage still occupied the parcel (Merriam 2004:11; Sanborn 1950). APN 002-482-026 is approximately 250 meters south of recorded historical archaeological site, CA-SLO-914, located outside the project area. CA-SLO=914 also exhibited historic artifacts and shell eroding from the creek bank in addition to artifacts and features observed on the surface of the alluvial flat.(Johnson 1980). 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 Extended Phase I Survey Methodology—MHWP-01 3.1.1. Basis for Extended Phase I Survey Presently, the nature of the cultural materials at MHWP-01 is unknown. It is possible that foundations, privies, or trash deposits associated with the early development of San Luis Obispo exist below the ground surface. It is also plausible that marine shell observed on the ground surface may represent a prehistoric site component. An Extended Phase I Survey at MEW-01 will establish whether intact subsurface deposits exist within the project's direct APE and it-will reveal the nature of the marine shell identified in the deposit. Based on the surface distribution of artifacts observed during Garcia and Associates' 2004 inventory, the eastern boundary of MHWP-01 is located at the western edge of the sidewalk next to Higuera Street. 3.1:2 Survey Methodology Prior to the Extended Phase I Survey, a survey crew will stake and flag the direct APE boundary at APN 002-482-023. Before conducting test excavations, a sample of diagnostic materials will be collected from the ground surface to serve as a comparative data set for subsurface deposits,. Garcia and Associates proposes to excavate a minimum of four 50 cm x 50 cm square shovel test probes (STP) inside the western boundary of the direct APE at archaeological site MHWP-01. The locations of STPs will be plotted on project maps and Global Positioning System (GPS) units will be used to record the locations of all excavation units.. Soils will be excavated in 20 cm levels, and screened through 1/4 in (6.2 mm) mesh hardware cloth or through 1/8 in (3.1 mm if a prehistoric component, comprising artifacts other than marine shell, is identified. Excavation of STPs will continue to a depth of one meter or until.two culturally-sterile levels are encountered. Proposal—Eiitended Phase i Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Wideniag Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 Recovered artifacts will be retained, bagged, and labeled according to provenience. Only a sample of bulky or redundant materials (i.e., can fragments, concrete chunks) will be collected; quantities and material types will be recorded in the field prior to redepositing those items at the bottom of the STPs. Field observations will be recorded on standard Historic Artifact Inventory forms. Soil colors will be recorded using Munsell Soil Color charts. All excavations will be backfilled and the area restored as nearly as possible to its original appearance. Color digital photographs will be taken to document the fieldwork. Following excavation, an updated California Department of Parks and Recreation DPR- 523 primary record form will be completed for MIWP-01. Based on an examination of soils in the study area and creek bank stratigraphy, we assume that sediments will be a loamy alluvial sand with increased clay content with depth. Given the nature of the sediments, we assume that the Field Director, assisted by two crewmembers,can complete the fieldwork effort in two days. In the event human remains are encountered, Garcia and Associates will adhere to the provisions of Sections 7052 and 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Section 7052 states that disturbance of Indian cemeteries is a felony. Section 7050.5 requires that construction or excavation be stopped near discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If the remains are Native American, Section 7052 states that the coroner must contact the California Native American Heritage Commission. 3.1.3 Decision Thresholds Excavation of STPs at MHWP-01 will continue to a depth of 100 centimeters or until two levels of culturally-sterile soils are encountered. Building foundations or other structural features, privies., and trash dumps, constitute intact historic archaeological deposits. Intact prehistoric deposits include cultural midden with densities of artifacts, or features such as house floors;hearths or rock-lined roasting pits. If intact deposits are encountered, the Extended Phase I Study will halt and GANDA, Morro Group,.the City of San Luis Obispo, and Caltrans will consult to determine if a full evaluation of the site is required. 3.2 Extended Phase I Survey Methodology—APN 002482-026 3.2.1.Basis for Extended Phase I Survey A cursory examination of soils along the east bank of San Luis Obispo Creek revealed two areas of historic artifacts, marine shell, and modem refuse, within loamy alluvial sand soils, eroding from the terrace downslope for a distance, of between 2:5 and 3.5 meters. This suggests that subsurface deposits may exist within the study area. Due to its proximity to the confluence of San Luis Obispo and Stenner creeks, and because APN Proposal—Extended Phase 1 Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 C 11. �a 002-482-026 is largely undeveloped, it possesses the most potential for intact archaeological deposits within the project area. An Extended Phase I Study within the direct APE of the alluvial flat at APN 002-482-026 will determine the presence or absence of cultural deposits in the study area. 3.2.2 Survey Methodology Prior to the Extended Phase I Survey, a survey crew will stake and flag the direct APE boundary at APN 002-482-026. Garcia and Associates proposes to excavate approximately eight 50 cm x 50 cm square shovel test probes (STP) placed ten meters apart inside the western boundary of the direct APE along parcel 002482-026 fronting Higuera Street. The locations of STDs will be plotted on project maps and Global Positioning System (GPS) units will be used to record the locations of all excavation units. Soils will be excavated in 20 cm levels, and screened through 1/8 in (3.1 mm) mesh hardware cloth. If artifacts are recovered, they will be retained, bagged, and labeled according to provenience. Only a sample of bulky or redundant materials (i.e., can fragments, concrete chunks) will be collected; quantities and material types will be recorded in the field prior to redepositing those items at the bottom of the STPs. Field observations will be recorded on standard STP Inventory forms. Soil colors will be recorded using Munsell Soil Color charts. All excavations will be backfilled and the area restored as nearly as possible to its original appearance. Color digital photographs will be taken to document the fieldwork. Following excavation, a California Department of Parks and Recreation DPR-523 primary record form will be completed for any new sites. Based on an examination of soils in the study area and creek bank stratigraphy, we assume that sediments will be a loamy alluvial sand with increased clay content with depth. Given the nature of the sediments, we assume that the Field Director, assisted by two crewmembers,can complete the fieldwork effort in three days. In the event human remains are encountered; Garcia and Associates will adhere to the provisions of Sections 7052 and 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Section 7052 states that disturbance of Indian cemeteries is a felony. Section 7050.5 requires that construction or excavation be stopped near discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American.. If the remains are Native American, Section 7052 states that the coroner must contact the California Native American Heritage Commission. 3.2.3 Decision Thresholds Excavation of STPs will continue to a depth of one meter, or until cultural materials are recovered. If archaeological materials, i.e., artifacts, features, etc., are located in any of the excavation units placed in the direct APE, then excavation will terminate in that unit. Proposal-Exuded Pbase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 C q- l2 Recovery of archaeological materials will be taken as evidence of the presence of an archaeological site within the APE. In other words, excavation is being conducted to determine the presence or absence of cultural materials in the APE; excavation will be terminated in a STP if cultural soils are encountered. This decision will be determined by an inspection of the stratigraphic profile by the Field Supervisor. Building foundations or other structural features, privies, and trash dumps, constitute intact historic archaeological deposits. Intact prehistoric deposits include cultural midden with densities of artifacts, or features such as house floors, hearths or rock-lined roasting pits. If intact cultural deposits are encountered, the Extended Phase I Study will halt and GANDA, Morro Group, the City of San Luis Obispo, and Caltrans will consult to determine if a full evaluation of the site is required. 40 LABORATORY AND DATA ANALYSIS Artifacts recovered in the _field will be transported to Garcia and Associates' laboratory for processing. All collected artifact/sample specimens will be washed (as appropriate), sorted, counted, weighed, and tabulated. Artifacts will be cataloged, classified, weighed, measured, numbered, and illustrated following professional standards. Historic materials Will be cataloged separately from prehistoric materials (if present) following functional categories generally accepted for late nineteenth century sites in the Western United States as developed by South (1977) and refined by Costello et al. (1996). The assemblages will be analyzed with reference to functional and morphological attributes, and chronological indicators. Descriptions will be made for classes of artifactual and ecofactual materials. The historical archaeological collection will be cataloged and processed using the following material type categories: shell, animal bone, botanical remains, ceramics, glass, metal, architectural debris (brick, concrete, wood, etc.) and miscellaneous small personal items. Fragile items that might require special handling will be removed prior to washing. If a prehistoric component is discovered; then, at a minimum, faunal material, beads, flaked stone, ground stone, and other items will be counted, weighed, and sorted by species or material type. Diagnostic artifacts will be analyzed. Analytical research will also focus on technology, subsistence-settlement, and exchange activities as represented by the assemblages. Assemblages will be cataloged and processed as follows: • Time-Sensitive Artifacts (e.g., projectile points, beads): classified .according to recognized typological schemes; data useful in defining assemblages and assessing site function and depositional integrity. Proposal—Extended Plum[Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 , -13 • Flaked Stone: organized by functional and morphological attributes, material, and artifact type; measured, weighed, and condition noted; bifaces subdivided based on reduction stage. • Debitage: counted, weighed, and sorted by material type; analyzed by category (e.g., primary reduction, early biface thinning, etc.). • Battered and Ground Stone Artifacts: separated into functional categories (e.g., pestle, mano, mortar); described by tool morphology. • Shell and Bone Artifacts: organized by functional category (e.g., fishhook, awl, etc.); described by tool morphology, including measurements, modifications and fragment types; used to assess site deposit, and to infer site function. • Faunal Analyses: specimens organized by genus, species, element, age, weight, condition, unidentifiable elements, and intrusive rodent categories; summarized by number of identifiable specimens per species (NLSP), minimum number of individuals (MAI); used to define assemblage constituents, site function, and relative contribution of various taxa to native diet. 5.0 NATIVE AMERICAN COORDINATION Caltrans policy, based on state and federal law, is to request that a Native American monitor be present at the excavation of all prehistoric sites. Presently, it is uncertain if MHWP-01 represents both historic and prehistoric components. In addition, during Native American consultation for this project, many individuals expressed concerns about unearthing burials in the area. Excavations in APN 002-482-026 will help to establish if subsurface prehistoric sites are present in the project area. Ms. Lei Lynn Odom has spoken with GANDA about providing Native American monitoring for the proposed Extended Phase I Survey. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) lists Ms. Odom as a Chumash Native American contact for this area. GANDA has assumed the presence of a Native American Monitor during all ground-disturbing activities in its cost estimate. 6.0 CURATION Garcia and Associates will arrange for archaeological materials recovered during the Extended Phase I Survey to be curated at the San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society's (SLOCAS) research and collection facility in San Luis Obispo. Garcia and Associates will not be responsible for ongoing curation costs and, has assumed in its budget that no more than one standard curation box will require pacing and shipping to SLOCAS. For budgeting purposes, we have assumed curation costs will not exceed $1000; however, this is only an estimate. It is assumed that, due to the minimal amount of excavation proposed, the quantity of artifacts recovered will below. Proposal-.Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 7.0 PROJECT PERSONNEL Carole Denardo, M.A., RPA, will serve as the Principal Investigator for the proposed Extended Phase I Survey project. Ms. Denardo is an archaeologist with 22 years of experience in both prehistoric and historic archaeology, as well as experience in working with contemporary Native Americans. At Garcia and Associates; Ms; Denardo serves as either the principal investigator or project manager, or as key personnel for architectural, historical, and archaeological technical studies. Ms. Denardo meets the Secretary of Interior 7s Qualification Standards for Archaeology. She has conducted and supervised numerous technical studies and impact assessments for compliance with federal laws including Sections 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and various state laws such as the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for clients in both the public and private sectors. Dan Hart, M.A., RPA, will be,the Field Director: Mr. Hart is a historical archaeologist with over 12 years of experience who has also been engaged in numerous prehistoric archaeological projects. Brent Leftwich, M.A., and Marc Linder, B.A., will assist as field crewpersons. Mr. Leftwich is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of California at Santa Barbara, where he is engaged in hunter=gatherer and lithic studies. Mr. Linder is a local resident of San Luis Obispo; he has participated in numerous archaeological surveys, testing; and data recovery projects in California for more than 15 years. Field crew substitutions may be made to ensure that the work schedule is completed in a timely manner. 8.0 REPORTS AND DELIVERABLES Within one (1) month of the completion of fieldwork, Garcia and Associates will produce a draft report documenting the results of the Extended Phase I Survey. This report will meet or exceed the technical and professional standards outlined in the Caltrans' Draft Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Cultural Resources (Caltrans 2001). This report. will provide explicit conclusions addressing the needs for which the work was undertaken (e.g., where site limits are located in relation to the APE and/or area of direct impact, the depth of the site, and the general constituents recovered). Ata minimum, the following information will be included in the report: • Site extent in terms of boundaries and depth • Excavated soil types • Descriptions of the classes.of artifactual and ecofactual materials recovered (totals-and distributional data by STPs and by depth for each unit and data class) • The temporal placement of the site(if diagnostic materials are recovered) • Description of any features (if encountered) Proposal–Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 cq —/5 Cx� Aif- A California Department of Parks and Recreation site records (DPR $23 [1995) will be used to update the existing site records for MHWP-01 following Instructions for Recording Historical Resources (Office of Historic Preservation 1995). Revised DPR 523 form(s) will be appended to the Extended Phase I Survey report for submittal to the Central Coastal Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System. GANDA will submit five (5) copies of the Draft Extended Phase I Survey Report for review by Morro Group, the City of San Luis Obispo, and Caltrans. The draft will be reviewed by members of the Chumash community and may be circulated outside Caltrans for peer review. Within one month of receipt of Caltrans' final comments, appropriate revisions will be made. to the report and twenty (20) copies s"ubmitted. It is our assumption that Caltrans will distribute copies of the final report to.FHWA, SHPO, and members of the Chumash community. Additional copies will be submitted by GANDA to the Central Coastal L-Iformation Center, and the San Luis Obispo County Archeological Society. 9.0 TIMETABLE Garcia and Associates understands that timely completion of the proposed Extended Phase 1 Survey is critical to the overall success of the Mid-Higuera Street Widening project. Data analyses and. report preparation will begin immediately upon completion of fieldwork. The.draft Extended Phase I Survey report will be submitted within one (1) month of completion of fieldwork; and the final Extended Phase,I Survey report will be submitted within two weeks of receipt of Caltrans' comments. Proposal—Extended Phase I Survey Garcia and Associates Mid-Higuera Street Widening Project August 4,2064, revised March 2005 + 10.0 REFERENCES CITED California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 2001 Draft Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Cultural Resources. Caltrans Publications Unit, Sacramento, California. Costello,Julia G.,Judith Marvin, Susan K. Goldberg, Adrian Praetzellis,Mary Praetzellis,Grace H. Zeising, and Melinda Horne 1996 Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan:Metropolitan Water District of Southern Calfornia's Headquarter's Facility Project. Applied EarthWorks, Inc.,Fresno, California. Submitted to Union Station Partners, Altadena,California. Denardo, Carole 2004 Positive Archaeological Survey Report: Proposed Mid- 11 Street Widening Project, San Luis.Obispo, California: Submitted to Morro Group; San Luis Obispo, California by Garcia and Associates. Job No. 6097. Prepared for the City of San Luis Obispo and Caltrans District 05, San Luis Obispo, California. Johnson, J. R. 1980 Archaeological Site Survey Record for CA-SLO-914. Department of Transportation, District 05, San Luis Obispo, California: Merriam, A. G. 2004 Histone Resources Evaluation Report for Mid-Hi Street.Widening, San Luis Obispo, California. Cannon Associates, San Luis Obispo. Prepared for Morro Group,Inc., San Luis Obispo, California. Monreal, L. 2005 Personal Communication. Project Manager,Morro Group, Inc., San Luis Obispo, California. Office of Historic Preservation 1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. South; Stanley 1971 Methods and Theory in Historical Archaeology. Academic Press,New York: Maps Hams & Lakin 1873 Reed&Co.'s Addition to the Town of San Luis Obispo. Proposal-Extended Phase I Survey - - Garcia and'Associates Mid-Higuera street Widening Project August 4,2004; revised March 2005 Harris,R.R. 1874 Map of the County of San Luis Obispo California. Britton Rey & Co., San Francisco. Glover,E.S. 1877 Bird's Eye View of San Luis Obispo, California. A.L. Bancroft & CO., San Francisco; California-.. Sanborn Insurance Maps 1886, 1888,1891, 19031 1903 corrected- to 1905, 1909, 1926, 1926 corrected to 1950. The Sanborn Map Company;New York,New York. Henderson, C.W. 1894 Sketch Map of the City of San Luis Obispo, California. City Directories San Luis Obispo City County Directory, 1901', Compiled and published by J.M. Deeds. Official Documents Assessors Map Book 1900-1949. County Grant Deed.Abstract for parcel 002-482-023. San Luis Obispo County.Assessor's Office, San Luis Obispo, California. Assessors Map Book 1900-1949. County Grant Deed.Abstract for parcel 002-482-015. San Luis Obispo County Assessor's Office, San Luis Obispo, California. San Luis Obispo Federal Census for 1860, 1870, 1880. On file at the San Luis Obispo County and City Library, San Luis Obispo, California: Proposal—Extended Phase 1 Survey Garcia and k&ociatd Mid-Higum Street Widening Project August 4,2004, revised March 2005 N Ilk r o F o 0 0 o R o 4 m b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o o r- o C6 ^ d o io, o o v 6 c m F N j SD Y Q � F-. Y UJ F yYy . Q � F Y 0 0 0 0 Cl) Y a r 0 M N Q O O F m w W O Y N y. m �Yp o o o O o ¢h y C 0 ~ 0 N � � e 9 0'0 m � Q 0 V U Q m C4 co a � o v 4mm _p E i a Ul C Q N < O O - a d Cn co W 0 r cm 0 0 Y 0 0 0 a a N CV CV m w e m �0 3 V C m N L a N w W Z f 7 O -� u C7 �' ,a LU U O m m LL Q C LL m Oa� o u c Z d to m a Z ° `0 eo a oLUv Z v o Q m U d m _ ° r a m Aa m mm m >_ _ c N Q p 2 o h°3 UILU CL CUc V E N �' ql N N V- V V m L C LQ L 9.al OF p mL. a ¢ U) wN cc to v°i iC n ¢ c0 ca U O O C7 U) w r a. m > ga ? E o > >_ _ c _ d m .Q Q — — > c o x a ¢ ¢ m D a a o9 CL a J U a a a a U) N cn m mm .7 CD O C7 .F o cG .v y O O O O IV u7 O O O p'O C07 t' O O c. O O CO No O K N (N —-6) 0 a 69 N & 6) 69 Nom, 6) 6) NN 6) d) µ} p pp to69 HO69 � 9 ,0 0 � MO 69 N 69 6% (a 69 . 69 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p d9 w 69 w 69 to 69 w 69 69 d9 69 di 69 69 W, EA f9 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 69 d9 69 69 69 69 69 0 69 69 6. 69 w 69 69 69 69 O O O q O 609 0 � CO W, f9 6% 69 6% 609 19 069 069 N 019 fcu 9 R . r N r r, (9 di 69 69 60 019 0(A to 0� di .to H 69 00 to 0M w 69� 61). f 0 [9 W, fA f9 69 (9 (9 f9 M 613. 0 fo 00 00 d09 609 H to C p 609 (A 069 069 V9. H 69 69 H to 0 0f9 6% 6% oo pp pp O pp O QD p p p p .Q di 69 f9 069 (9CIL iA (9 � (9 60 , � � fR 0wco 9 69 649. Q m co 0 NO O O O N 69 n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t` 69 (9 69 di 69 Of 69 69 69 (9 69 69 d9 69 (AA aa p p p. 69 69 p p p p p pp {�9 fA 0M f9 fR f�. LO M q ,0M /A f9 fA fA f9 069 069 f9 r (9 cmCD 6% 1% 'm 60% 29aaa609 603, afa tq, � QQ 1W) O C CO r CD m O V. w 0 m m N Q N F �. Cf Fes-• ti L LL v ao U d N y LL m Q. O Fa- cn U ai U op m y c m La 6 CD m O O ep w w :m a •U 2 v o LL a m = N y m m m — LL '� t L C a W U Q w a 0 to Q .1 m O Q L `—' a �' LL 5 3 v v m g ° a s � wc m a' N Q c a ° ' > _ — — _ oS a s Q Q O m .W co w /n In 7 a ¢ Q to y a a a s c 33c� U F v as (L am0000w y 7 0to (D O O n O co O O O OW 1 O O ;Q OiHh H co N nto N m NHO co ( A f60� (a 9 fD to HU � E9H (A O 69Q!� H O O O O(9 M O O ON NO y O O O f9 H OM H q O H Q OD O r O O O fA H C4 pp H (9 H O O O O H H pp O p 1 oO di 69 N 69 NCD O o ppC9O O 0 0 0 -O O N di (A p H O O e CA H H � 6 H 7 Wa U O O O O O V H y H H O O O O O - p N �tOf O b O O O O. O O O Q f9 OK N N N Wcy �[6 co O n. O n c O H (9 H 03, o V. C M O y H E9 CD W m m TE T T T m O CD m o o a as N v v o v E'C7 m CV n .= 'C�'OH 0 0 � 0 � ¢ O (A (A to fA fA C to C')n .� S m 0 O C •a4. N •7 u H 0 _ V O U � • o O Z q J p 7� O W y m '- �0F Q y o C F . .� O N T -W fA a u vo . ¢ o ¢ O o b c m a 9 ¢UCm7 Um ¢JQJ O 2 OU . _o Q Vm ®0m 'HXOm � a m CD mO Q S * CL U i.y ¢ o 9 O m? o a. w > 3L z z am O o U U o E U m W a o o uo�o p m 'T o m !fi x - Q 2 or m E _. `m m m CC 0 a•v UU mz0 m o CU09cs ao -x 0Qa0F = o[ a CL2U �'' O N _ . Lo O O� n t toODco N OD - H O) vi -N W N O O O O O O p fA fA h H O O O O O O C5 w di N H O O O O O p f9 f9 N H O Oto N O .W co LO fo N N N N V W 1 fA fA 40 O p O O fA H N O O O O, O O p f9 fA to N G O O O O p O 69 to N OCD_ O u N O O O co O Q O co o in o yi 4 n m in 69 H N69 69 Q N La m N N6%. �. cm H pco �Q fA fA f9 O o g o m a O t. O p 1R. U) m Vl IA N 7 NfA 6% r N 6N9 N. f9 N N N CO O F O O O O N UQm cm pW' N Yo) U U U o Q a C 0 m O aco o $ 69 w. W m w o m c0 � o m N c. . m c m C o Q . c ¢m s o`_ a v LL t4 U U a V V p d v3 9 CL _m O O N 7 J m m Lo' m d3 CL xO. n I O R 'Q p CL cc 0 IL am cr Q c LL L ;� aO W E i . m- a ¢ Q N Cp U- CL U E m F F CD a O x S m m t ° m O O. Q 0 m w mm m o U a ¢ U) F F Hag H2 C14 cm,