Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/04/2005, - 2004 ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 955 MORRO ST. 93401-3208 • rox; • , Vw \ rT+a Y \ 3 �'✓ �.y ��f�CLu .��i�S+'"Y.'.Cw•----�'--•q�""n �'�YJL.�*^�rui2-iiG�� 'a-yL,✓ � 2a. x ' �`� ^'�'• x-r d'i"�ry1h'�'Gi "�v-s^^Y��-"--� '�-- ,'�,r,'F'^� ��"+.�1" =!r�s� <u�rk�niY ✓<s�. ry it >�.. irw�"�y'a.-.i-4� - s«'^^'z'--rJr-,.a-• �.. '-C��,j x?�,ryi's'�¢•-� < �z Z.r''x r' 'xy y. � 4 ?a.-r.n•sr a.. ..i ��X�y��`+-ate T� S'v N t5 G x'r'v'- /?�/ s. exit � � < .t i - v z3 UBt6 of GOTWTCs 2004 TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OCTOBER 2005....................................................................................3 A MESSAGE FROM THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR.................................................................................................4 ' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................6 ' BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................................7 CITY-WIDE COLLISION STATISTICS................................................................................................................9 TABLE 3.1-CITY-WIDE ANNUAL COLLISION DATA................................................................................... ............. ...................._......................9 FIGURE 3.1-SIX YEAR COLLISION TREND..........................................................................................................................................................9 TABLE 3.2-CITY-%VIDE•ANNUAL INJURY AND FATAL COLLISIONS...................................................................................................................10 FIGURE 32-SIX YEAR INJURY COLLISION........................................................................................................................................................I 1 TABLE 3.3-COMPARISON OF INJURY&DEATH RATES.....................................................................................................................................12 TABLE3.4-ECONOMIC COSTS.2004.................................................................................................................................................................13 TABLE3.5-COMPREHENSIVE COSTS.2004.......................................................................................................................................................13 TABLE 3.6-CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ECONOMIC COSTS.2001-2004 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS...........................................................................14 BICYCLE& PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION SAFETY............................................................................ 15 TABLE 4.1-1999-2004 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS.............................................................................................................................................15 TABLE 4.2-2004 PEDFSTRI AN COLLISIONS BY TYPE,LOCATION,&FAULT....................................................................................................15 TABLE 4.3-TOP FIVE PEDESTRIAN COLLISION LOCATIONS.............................................................................................................................17 TABLE 4.4-1199-2104 BICYCLE COLLISIONS..................................................................................................................................................20 ' TABLE 4.5-2004 BICYCLE COLLISION BY TYPE&FAULT................................................................................................................................20................................ TABLE 4.6-Top FIVE BICYCLE COLLISION LOCATIONS.................................. .................................................................22 SAFETYINVESTIGATIONS_........_...........................................................................................».......................25 ' TABLE 5.1-2004 i 1TM REQUESTS AND STATUS...............................................................................................................................................25 2004 HIGH COLLISION RATE LOCATIONS....................................................................................................27 TABLE 6.1-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING TWO ARTERIAL' STREETS..........................................................................29 TABLE 6.2-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING ARTERL\UCOLLECTOR STREETS..............................................................32 TABLE 6.3-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING ARTERIAL/LOCAL STREETS.......................................................................35 TABLE 6.4-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING COLLECTOR/COLLECTOR STREETS...........................................................38 TABLE 6.5-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING COLLECTOR/LOCAL STREETS....................................................................39 ' TABLE 6.6-RE•COMMENDATIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS INVOLVING LOGAIJLOCAL STREETS............................................................................40 TABLE 6.7-RECO\(\fENDATIO\S FOR OTHER SIGNIFICANT INTERSECTIONS:5+LEFT TURN COLLISIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS.....43 TABLE 6.7-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OTHER SIGNIFICANT INTERSECTIONS:5+COLLISIONS AT INTERSECTIONS WITHOUT A.W.CONTROL..46 TABLE 6.8-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ARTERIAL SEGMENTS............................................................................................................................48 TABLE 6.9-RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COLLECTORTSNTS....................................................................................................................... .........5I TABLE 6.10-RECO\iMENDATIO\S FOR LOCAL SEGMENTS. .54 APPENDIX1................................................................................................................................................._.._......55 ARTERIAL/ARTERIAL INTERSECTIONS.............................................................................................................................................................55 ' ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR INTERSECTIONS..........................................................................................................................................................62 ARTERIAL/LOCAL INTERSECTIONS..................................................................................................................................................................69 COLLECTOR/COLLECTOR INTERSECTIONS.......................................................................................................................................................77 COLLECTOR/LOCAL' INTERSECTIONS-............................................................ .. ........................................................................... ........... ........ -80 LOCAL/LOCAL INTERSECTIONS........................................................................................................................................................................84 OTHER SIGNIFICANT INTERSECTIONS................................................................................................................................................................91 ARTERIALSEGMENTS......................................................................................................................................................................................103 COLLECTORSEGMENTS...................................................................................................................................................................................115 LOCALSEGMENTS...........................................................................................................................................................................................127 2004 POLICE DEPART.NIENT TRAFFIC SAFETY UNIT OPERATIONS REPORT...................................................................131 2004 Wdff1C y Rq)opt OCtOBER 2005 City Council Dave Romero, Mayor John Ewan, Vice Mayor Christine Mulholland Allen Settle ' Paul Brown City Administration Ken Ham pian, City Administrative Officer Wendy George, Assistant City Administrative Officer Public Works Department t Jay Walter; Public Works Director Timothy S. Bochum; Deputy Director of Public Works Dario Senor, City Traffic Engineer Peggy Mandeville, Principal Transportation Planner Jake Hudson, Assistant Engineer Chris Overby, Assistant Engineer Lynn Grosz, Transportation Intern 1 1 Contributing Staff Chief Debra Linden, Police Department tCaptain Ian Parkinson, Police Department Sergeant Peter Hubbard, Police Department 1 1 a messacl fpm the deputy olRectou Welcome to the 4th edition of the City of San Luis Obispo, Traffic Safety Report prepared by ' the Public Works Department with cooperation from the Police Department. The Annual Traffic Safety Report began in 2002 in an attempt to identify high collision locations within the City and actively pursue mitigation improvements that may reduce our collision rates and t improve safety for our citizens. After a year of decreased collision totals, we again saw an increase in total collisions in 2004 that was about 10% above recorded collisions in 2003. That number was still down, ' about-4%, from collision totals recorded in the first year (2002) of the traffic safety program. While total collisions were up, injury collisions (what we use as our benchmark) remained roughly the same with a 2.16% increase (or 315 collisions annually) over previous years ' experience. The number of fatality collisions in any given year is usually very random and this was the case in 2004 when the City experienced a sharp increase in the total fatalities (4) in 2004 over the 2003 total of zero (0)fatalities. The 2004 Traffic Safety Report again looks at bicycle and pedestrian collisions and tracks there occurrences to identify potential high profile locations. Similar to fatal collisiohs, bicycle and pedestrian collision rates are normally sporadic from a location and occurrence ' perspective. This continued to be the case for the City with pedestrian collisions up 52% from 2003 totals and bicycle collisions down by 7.4'/0. As in previous Traffic Safety Reports, staff reviewed the high collision rate intersection and segment locations in the City and recommends mitigation as contained in this report. It's through programs such as this report as well as programs like the Police Department's traffic safety enforcement program that we hope to curb these unacceptable trends and improve the safety of our motoring, walking and bicycling public. I would like to thank Jake Hudson, Dario Senor, Peggy Mandeville, Chris Overby, Lynn Grosz and members of the City Police. Department for their tireless work in compiling the ' necessary information that has gone into this.report, the many hours disseminating that data to make recommendations for appropriate improvements and for all the future work that will be necessary to complete our tasks, meet our objectives, and make our streets as safe as possible. Sincerely i 1 Timothy Scott Bochum, P.E. Deputy Director of Public Works 4 executive SUMMARY Annual Traffic Safety Report - 2004 ' In January 2002, the City initiated its first comprehensive Traffic Safety Program aimed at reducing collisions at the highest collision locations in the City. This program concentrates .on identifying all intersections and roadway segments which have ' experienced three or more collisions in a one-.year period and then prioritizes these locations based upon collision rates as compared .to similar locations within the City. Collision patterns at the highest collision rate locations are then analyzed using collision diagrams that are produced using state of the art computer software. Each of the locations is then reviewed by staff to determine if mitigation measures can be implemented to reduce the likelihood of occurrence for the identified collision patterns. 1 Mitigation measures for high collision rate locations for calendar year 2004 have been identified and are summarized in this report. The Annual Traffic Safety Report will be prepared each year to review and report on City traffic safety benchmarks, improve traffic safety performance and maintain high levels of "service for our City residents, business owners and visitors. Although traffic collisions have historically been on an upward trend in San Luis Obispo, in 2003 the number of reported collisions actually dropped and was the lowest in the four years of the safety program. Although we recorded a 10% increase in collisions in 2004 from 2003, there were still 4% less collisions since the beginning of the traffic safety report despite significant interruption to traffic due to increased construction activity in 2004, namely the Foothill Bridge closure and construction in the downtown. After a year of these decreased collision totals, we again saw an increase in total collisions (1,206) in,2004 that was about 10% above recorded collisions in 2003. That number was still down, about -4%, from collision totals recorded in the first year (2002) of the traffic safety program. Injury collisions were also up by a small percentage (2%) in 2004 (315) as compared to 2003 (307). Injury collisions as a percentage of all collisions have historically been on the rise by about 5 to 6% per year. tThe number of fatality collisions in any given year is usually very random and this was the case in 2004 when the City experienced a sharp increase in the total fatalities (4) in 2004 over the 2003 total of zero (0) fatalities. In previous years there have been between 1 and 2 fatalities per year except in 2003 when there were no fatalities: Intersection collisions declined from 2001 to 2003 although in 2004, intersection collisions had increased by 9% over previous year totals. This amount still remained below the 2001 calendar year total. The 2004 Traffic Safety Report again looks at bicycle and pedestrian collisions and tracks there occurrences to identify potential high profile locations. Similar to fatal. collisions, bicycle and pedestrian collision rates are normally sporadic from a location and occurrence perspective. This continued to be the case for the City with pedestrian. collisions up 52% from 2003 totals and bicycle collisions down by 7.4%. 5 section 1 Mobluction How to Use This Report Every year the City of San Luis Obispo will prepare a Traffic Safety Report for the previous twelve month period in order to: 1) determine the locations within the City that have the highest collision rates in comparison to like locations, 2) identify the predominant pedestrian. and bicycle collision types and high 'collision locations, 3) evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation measures implemented in the previous twelve month period, 4) identify if new locations should be mitigated, and 5) determine if the types of collisions and previous collision trends have changed. This report identifies locations that may require special attention or mitigation in order to the number of collisions or severity of future collisions. The report will normally be prepared after City collision statistics become available in April or May of the following year. The locations mentioned in this report should not be interpreted as.a list of dangerous or "least safe" intersections within the City of San Luis Obispo. The specific total of collisions for any location for any year is a function of various factors such as weather pattems, construction, roadway conditions and driver habits: Many of these factors are often difficult to identify and are most often beyond the ability of the engineer to change or control. However, the City's mitigation program attempts to identify roadway elements that can be modified so as to make the transportation infrastructure more driver friendly, reduce driver confusion, promote bicycle and pedestrian safety and limit impact severity. It is natural to expect that any location in the City will experience years above or below the 1 expected value of collision rates that might be common to similar locations City-wide. Traffic volumes play an important role in determining the likelihood of collision totals (The more- pedestrians orepedestrians and vehicles that Use a location...the more likely a collision will occur). This t report.looks to identify locations that fall above the expected rate of similar City locations and propose mitigation measures, if necessary to reduce collision potential and limit collision severity. 6. 1 1 SECtl0n 2 1 Backgwuno ' 2.1 Study Objectives The objective of the Annual Traffic Safety Report is essentially to identify the:high collision 1 locations in the City and track collision reductions through the various City safety programs and projects that the.City administers each year. The specific objectives of the 2004 Traffic Safety Report are: 1 • Identify the intersections and segments within the City associated with the highest collision rates, and thoroughly analyze collision diagrams so as to suggest remedial mitigation measures for the five highest locations that will reduce the 1 potential for collisions', and;,. • Identify other significant signalized and non-signalized intersections which meet 1 State warrants for traffic control upgrades, and; • . Identify the predominant pedestrian and bicycle collision types and high collision, 1 locations, and thoroughly analyze collision diagrams and police reports so as to determine remedial mitigation measures for the five highest pedestrian and bicycle collision locations that may reduce the potential for collisions and; 1 Report on engineering safety analysis conducted in the previous 12=month period that the City and general public have identified as areas of concern regarding appropriate traffic control. ' 2.2 Study Methodology 1 Collision Data It is important to note that the data contained within the Public Works Traffic Collision Database will vary-from other sources of collision data such as the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) or the City's Emergency Dispatch Records System. While SWITRS data is similarly derived from official.police collision reports, many times the reports are coded incorrectly due to jurisdictional boundary issues and/or agency reporting inaccuracies. An example of this might be.a collision occurring on Highway 101 — because the facility is under Caltrans jurisdiction, this collision record and its potential remediation would not be included in this report. However, because the CHP report may statethe collision occurred within the City of San Luis Obispo, the SWITRS database might contain this as a collision under our jurisdiction. Likewise,. City. emergency dispatch may receive a call regarding a traffic collision but when the dispatched officer arrives, the vehicles have been moved on or there is no evidence of occurrence. Therefore, statistics derived from this data may inaccurate for engineering purposes because no official proof or record exists of the actual collision type. Reported traffic collisions obtained by the City Police Department are.the basis used by the t City Traffic Engineering Section to determine traffic safety. Report totals were obtained for . 1 each intersection and roadway segment within the City_ and entered into the City's traffic ' collision database. These locations were then grouped by street characteristic and collision type. Collision diagrams were then generated using this data and interpretations of collision patterns were formulated. The number of collisions reported by the Police Department , annually is approximately 100 to 150 higher than the number reported in this Public Works report. The primary-reason for this discrepancy is that the Police Department report includes collisions that may have occurred on private property, such as a parking lot, while the Public 1 Works department does not track collisions on private property because it is outside of the. departments,jurisdiction. Based on the collision pattems for the five Highest ranked collision locations for each location ' and roadway segment sub-category, mitigation measures are formulated where a collision pattern can.be identified. ' Traffic Volumes Vehicle and pedestrian volumes play an important role in establishing collision rates for selected locations within the City. Vehicle volume counts were collected in 2001, 2002, & 2005 as a basis to establish actual conditions in the field environment. Where volume counts were not available, volumes were estimated based on previous experience and engineering judgment. Volume counts were then used for the majority of the locations to establish isolated and average collision rates for each intersection. Collision Rate Calculations Collision rates were calculated using the following formulas: 1 Intersections: Segments:. RI = N X 1,000,000 RS =. N X 1,000,000 V X 365 365 X V X.L Where: RI = Intersection Collision Rate = Collision frequency per million vehicles entering the intersection. RS = Segment Collision Rate=Collision frequency per million vehicle.miles ' traveled along the segment. N = Number of collisions (collision frequency) of the location. V= Average daily vehicular volume using the street segment or intersection. ' L = Length of street segment (in miles) being analyzed. Pedestrians: Bicycles: PREV= 5 X N X PHW BREV 5 X N X PHW _PHPV- - PHBV Where: ' PREV= Pedestrian 'risk exposure value. BREV = Bicycle risk exposure value. N = Number of collisions (col'l'ision frequency) of the location: PHW = Average peak hour vehicular volume. PHPV = Average peak hour pedestrian volume. PHBV = Average peak hour bicycle volume. ' The pedestrian and bicycle risk exposure value formula is derived from the traditional collision rate calculation, however it factors the volume of either bicycle or pedestrian traffic with that of ' motor vehicle traffic ata given location. 8 ' section 3 City wc1 w, COlbsion stanza 3.1 City-wide Collision Trends Reportable collision statistics for .the City are contained in Tables 3.1 and 3.2. Any reported collision within the public right-of-way that involved a fatality, personal injury or property damage was .recorded as a collision. Collisions that occurred on private property, out of the public right of way, outside of City limits, or were not reported to the ' police department are not entered into the City's database. While reported Collisions are not a total indicator of transportation collisions that occur within the City, they remain the basis with which the City determines both collision trends and effectiveness of City programs. The number of reported traffic collisions varies due to many social factors. Often minor traffic collisions, non-injury collisions and private property collisions go unreported and as such are highly unreliable in determining "high profile" collision locations or areas_ of concern. Table 3.1 indicates the reported traffic collision history of the City. Table 3.1 - City-wide Annual Collision Data Total Reported Year Collisions on Public streets Intersections %Change Total %Change 1999 587 - 910 - _ _2000 646 +10.05 1,025 +11.22 2001 768 +18.58 - 1,142 +10.24-- -- 2002 10.24"- -- 2002 751 -2.13 1,255 +9.10 2003 670 -12.08 . 1.097 T.. -12.58 2004 731-:- - +9.10 1;206 -- +9.94 _ Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database Variations in yearly collisions are to be expected. While total collisions are a good indicator of the overall collision performance of the City, injury collisions are better indicators of changes in collision trends and are the most reliable collision indicators Iwhen monitoring the safety of a transportation system. Figure 3.1 - Six Year Collision Trend 1.300 :rE:a--•M; ;.:4,.X. EE--,-e:r ^ix,`.�x" 1,200 f Rkw-% 1,700 sT1.000 w 900 ` Soo 700 .,...mss ..x.a..� w:� r�.,.._.r..: .tea, .. :.. �.... i 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 .2004 .9 'Sq/c1}•Program Begins After a year of decreased collision totals, we again saw an increase in'total collisions in 2004 that was about 10%above recorded collisions in 2003. That number was still down, about-4%, from collision totals recorded in thefirst year (2002) of the traffic safety' program. In general, collisions in.San Luis Obispo have been increasing over the last few years. In general, total collisions have increased approximately 11 % per year for the three year period from 1999 to 2002. In 2003 total collisions were down by 14%. Calendar year 2004 also saw a year of significant roadway construction resulting in traffic disruptions. The Foothill Bridge closure was in place for most of the year and collisions and congestion levels along adjacent streets including Santa Rosa, Murray and Casa caused many vehicles to divert to other travel corridors such as California and Los Osos Valley Road. At the same time, many Downtown streets had construction I activities and detours resulting from the County Administration Building, Court Street. Project, 919 Palm Street construction and the seismic retrofit program. 3.2 Injury and Fatal Collision Trends M Iniury Collisions The Traffic Engineering Division tracks injury and fatal collisions as part the current Traffic Safety Program. Table & Figure 3.2 depicts the injury collision information as recorded by the City. ' Table 3.2- City-wide Annual Injury and Fatal Collisions Year Total injury %Change %of Total Fatal %Change Coilisions Collisions Collisions 1999 240 - -. 26.37- 2.-- --- 2000 -- -- 2000-__ —___269__._-_—_-__+12.08_ _26.24- 2 0 2001 _ - 265 __ _ _ - _ _-1.5---_ --- _ -23.26 - - 1 -50 2002 309 +16.60 24.66 1 0 2003 307 _ -06- I 1 28.11-- - 0 - 100 2004 _315- - — +2.06 -- - 26.12. q +400 Although total collisions were marginally up in 2004, injury collisions were only slightly up by 2% in 2004 (315) as compared to 2003 (307). This number was also consistent with the three year period from 2002 through 2004. Injury collisions as a percentage of total collisions (as seen in Figure 3.3) was actually lower than the previous 12 month period due largely in fact that the total number of injury collision remained somewhat static while total collisions increased by 10%. While total number of injury collisions are above the average period of 1999 through.2001, the number of injury collision during 2002 thorough.2004 has remained consistent near the 310/year mark.. 10. ' Figure 3.2- Six Year Injury Collision 330 -.-__ - -_�,�•>__�...:-_= >...._.� •• -._�'�;ti:,.- -- - 310ia- +x s 290 '~ �Y• �.. .26`gz'G T>,� 3-±z...zr'`- Js"._axy 'z=..� m3�`'�._"� �i 270 ""-`r 2�� 250 '� `_:..x..,- tps-.. - .ru. "z�:u' x- t.y-w""'�n-'" - 230 ,i--:a. 210 �`"';=moo �..,-;g, 'x., '��f :;�i��-•a. ,��„""-`",,,�' -r'•-'Y��`^'t- 3 c a3. s 190 E .�.�. E.._,'- �>�i•,,�; ��:.r _ .-�-t... ,;,mss we 174 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Safety Program Begins Figure 3.3 -Injury Collisions as Percent of Total Collisions 30.00% - _ r-a�,,..�' -w'-''��, ,; ��s-�-�� -•s� sem,- F_�"r-n, -z� u- . �. 29.00°/O i. ar3 vz 4 I# c > Rv v v a � ' x exw .c �-x•- �--tr i�sy `'V`ax•1 281'1,/0 v�-.�-t z.-^l 28.00°/O _... �..r�;_ - .?—s. _'- ia.. .._._. ;�;•.vfi' .:r...:..=1i�:.i:;,y,;+'i:::tib v= :':n'_aas. '.^':-:: "'^ ?S .rPc.:`. 27.00% ..` tea _ /X-251 26.00% ,,y '"u".. •x. 25.00% E 24.00% t ly ;, -v1.(y:'t} � •ri �ft:n-'$- .1hS l<� ...b3. 6s 23.00% �v...5.} ...].1A'_r .f11� �. v�.e✓.v'!+ 1� 1 G 4t 1' L 1, ... .. 22.00%p x vw r dfi A � � r{f ss"^Jva 21.00% .:.wa r_ 20.00°/O 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 ' Fatal Collisions Annual traffic fatalities have a tendency to fluctuate from year to year. This variation is due to many factors that are often beyond the control of engineering professionals or law enforcement officers. However, the City's Traffic Safety program attempts to reduce fatal collisions by removing conflicting vehicular and pedestrian movements at appropriate locations, limiting collision severity through improvements to roadway design features, and promoting traffic safety through a community outreach program. As mentioned above, fatality collisions in any given year is usually very random and this was the case in 2004 when the City experienced a sharp increase in the total fatalities (4) in 2004 over the 2003 total of zero (0) fatalities. In previous years there have been between one and two fatalities per year except in 2003 when there were no fatalities. 11 Four fatalities were reported in 2004 within City limits. Of the 4 fatalities,.2 occurred on 1 Hwy 227 (Broad Street) which is under State (Caltrans) jurisdiction; one of which was related to "driving while under the influence" (DUI). Of the 2 fatalities that occurred within the City's jurisdiction, one was.an exhibition of speed violation and the final was a left turn violation attributed to"driving while under the influence". 3.3 Comparison with National, State and County Rates Author's Note: All national and state statistics and cost estimates contained in this section are the most up to date figures available at the time of this publication_ Table 3.3 demonstrates the significant difference between City death and injury rates and the National statistics. The numbers in this table represent the actual number of ' injuries or fatalities resulting from traffic collisions, not the number of collisions that involved injuries or fatalities.. Table 3.3 - Comparison of Injury& Death Rates 2004 Fatalities_ -Fatalities Population Rate Per 100,000 (Thousands) Po ulation Nationally' 42,643 -290,810 14.66 State Wide 4215 36,271 11.62 City of San Luis Obispo 4 45: 8.89 2004 Injuries Injuries Population Rate Per 100,000 (Thousands) Population National ' 2,889,000 290,810_ 993. State Wide' 307,166 35,934 854 _ City of San Luis P046- _ _ 376 _ 45 835 _ National and State Statistics are from 2003 because 2004 information was not available at the time this report was being produced. 3.3 BenefitlCost Analysis The National Safety Council has provided the following information and estimates. There are two methods currently used to measure the costs of motor-vehicle collisions. One is the economic cost framework and the other is the comprehensive cost framework.. ' Economic costs may be used by a community or state to estimate the economic impact of motor-vehicle collisions that occurred within its jurisdiction in a given time period. It is a measure of the productivity lost and expenses incurred because of the collisions. ' Economic costs, however, should not be used for cost=benefit analysis because they do not reflect what society is willing to pay to prevent a statistical fatality or injury: There are five economic -cost components: (a) wage and productivity losses, which include wages, fringe benefits, household production, and travel delay, (b) medical expenses including emergency service costs; (c) administrative expenses; which include ' the administrative cost of private and public insuranceplus police and legal costs; (d) motor-vehicle damage including the value of damage to property; and (e) employer costs for collisions to workers. ' 12 ' ! The information in table 3.4 shows the average economic costs in 2005 per death (hot per fatal collision), per injury(not per injury collision), and per property damage.collision. These cost estimates are based upon 2002 actual collision cost calculations. Table 3.4- Economic Costs, 2004 Collision Type Dollar Loss Death $1,090,000 Nonfatal disabling injury $39,900 Incapacitating injury $52,100 Non-incapacitating evident injury $17,200 Possible injury $9,800 ! Property damage collision (including minor $6,200 injuries Source;National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(Traffic Safety Facts 2002) Comprehensive costs include not only the economic cost components, but also a measure of the value of lost qual_fty of life associated with the deaths'and injuries, that is, what society is willing to pay to prevent them. The values of lost quality of life were obtained through empirical studies of what people actually pay to reduce their safety and health risks, such as through the purchase of air bags or smoke detectors. Comprehensive costs should be used for cost-benefit analysis, but because the lost quality of life represents only a dollar equivalence of intangible qualities, they do not represent real economic losses and should not be used to determine the economic impact of past collisions. The information below in table 3.5 shows the average comprehensive costs in 2004 on a per person basis. These cost estimates are based upon 2002 actual collision cost .calculations. Which are the latest at the time of this publication. Currently, the City's collision reports indicate injury collisions only if reported at the collision scene and no determinations are made regarding the injury type as shown in the above tables. Therefore, comprehensive cost estimates for this analysis will assume that all injury types fall into the category of "Non-incapacitating evident injury" as shown above. Table 3.6 shows the 2004 economic costs in collisions for the City using annual cost estimates. Table 3.5- Comprehensive Costs, 2004 Collision Type Dollar Loss Death $3,470,000. Incapacitating injury (a) $172,000 Non-incapacitating evident injury (a) $44,200 Possible injury (a) $21,000 -No-in u Source:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(Traffic Safety Facts 2002) l3 Table 3:6- City of San Luis Obispo.Econornic Costs, 2001-2004 Traffic Collisions Collision Type Year — Death -- - - Non-incapacitating Property Damage Only Total Dollar Injury Loss Cost" _ Costs) Cosh _ 200.1 1 $1,000,000 335 $5,762,000 877 $5,700;500- $12,462,500 2002 1 1 $1,000,000 396 $6;811,200 ----946- 46,149;000 $13,960,200 2003 0 $0.00 400 $6,880,000 . 794 $4,922,800 - $11,802;800_: _2004_ _ 4 $4,360,000 315 $5,418,000 1 887 $5,499,400 $15,277,400 a Economic costs are based upon 2002 cost estimates. While the dollar amounts depicted in Table 3.6 do not equate to tangible monetary costs, it is evident that the annualized costs to city motorists, insurance companies and medical providers, depend on the number(and type) of traffic collisions that occur within the City. e Thtotal cost.ame ount depends highly on the collision type and is proportional to the severity of each type of collision type. 14 section 4 BIcycLC&pec)Fstuian tuanspoination safety 4.1 Pedestrian Collisions In January 2000 a City-wide pedestrian crossing policy was adopted by the City Council. This policy is designed to ultimately bring all of the pedestrian crossings in the City to a consistent standard. As the policy-continues--to be implemented over the next several years it is anticipated that pedestrian collisions will decline.City-wide. In general the number of annual pedestrian collisions has fluxuated up and down over . the past six years. There were 30 total pedestrian related collisions reported in 2004, 52% higher than the previous 12 month period. Table 4.1 indicates the reported pedestrian related collision history of the City. Table 4.1— 1999-2004 Pedestrian Collisions _ Total Repoited _ Year Pedestrian Collisions on Public Streets Pedestrian %Change 1999 24 2000 37 +54% - 2001 - -- _19 149% 2002. . _ - - 41 - - - +54% - - 2003 1 24 -41 2004 1 -41 _ +41% - - Source: City of San Luis Traffic,Collision Database The study's- method of evaluation follows the recommendations of the. U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) as pertaining to bicycle collisions, by which 'pedestrian collisions are classified according to their collision type. In general the two primary factors contributing to pedestrian collisions in 2003 were pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk at'a mid-block location, and motorists watching on-coining traffic while turning left against a pedestrian. The following tables lists the various types of pedestrian related collisions.as detailed in Police Reports: 1 l� I Table 4.2— 2004 Pedestrian Collisions by Type, Location, & Fault Severity_ Pedestrian Collision Type. _ -- . #C ases' %of Total Inju Fatal. PDO In Road Crossing Midblock 9 21.956% 8 1 0 In X-Walk-Motorist Left Tum in Front of Ped. 8 19.51% 7 d 1 In Sidewalk-At Driveway 5 12.19% 4 0 1 In X-Walk-Motorist Right of Way Violation _ __ - -__ 4 9.756/o 4 0 0 Other-Non Classifiable 4 9.75% 3 0 1 In X-Walk-Motorist Right Tum in Front of Ped. 4 9.75% 3 0 1 In Road-At Parked Vehicle 3 7.31% 2 0 1 In X-Walk-On Don't Walk Indication 1_ 2.436/6 1 6 0 f In X-Walk-Motorist Right Turn.Facin Ped._ 1 2.43% 1 0 0 In X-Walk:- Failed to Cross in Time 1 2.43% 1 _0_ 0 In Sidewalk-At Intersection 1 2.430/a 0 0 1 Total: 41 100 34 1 6 2001 2.002 2003 2004 Pedestrian Collision Location _ Signal 8 42% -14 340%- 6 25% 13 32% Out of Crosswalk-Midblock 3 16% 13 32% 7 29% -9 22% f Uncontrolled-Unmarked Crosswalk Major/Collector " --0 -00W 0 00W - 0 0% 1 2% Uncontrolled-Unmarked Crosswalk Local 0 0% 0 - 0% 0 0% 0 0% Uncontrolled-Marked _ 1- -- 5% 3 790 0 0% 1 20/6 Not in Road(Sidewalk) 0 0% 2 5% 0 0% 5 12% In Road(not crossing) 2 11% 2 5% 3 12% 7- ---18% Stop-Marked Crosswalk _ - 1 5% 3 7% 4 17% 3 1 7% Stop-Unmarked Crosswalk 4 21% 4 10% 4 17%-L - 2 _ 5% Total: 19 1000 41 100% 24 100% rn41 100%100% PartV at Fault _2001 2002 2003 2004_ Pedestrian 5 26% 12 29% 8 33% 15 37% Driver 14 74% 29_- 1 71% 16 67% 26 63% ❑ LJ - Total: 19 . - - 10D% � 41 1 DO% - 24 100% 41 _-100% Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database ' 6 r CO C c Z _� O >. _ U O. N > T 0 p N O m m, C -- -- a MOt. N Q C r CO) C w 'OO o _p d, N 7 O C p b1 w O.W C C 3 _ o o m n c o "p MO = j N m C , ­3C a to f6 C (� C a N N Q CL t9 N l9 O C U O U x C Oa OY . N C. fn N N CO -'(D L 0 .6) t0 7. to 3 C C C O O _ N o pC N L Y N U U a - N U. C .� O.lfjcc C. 3 U 0) C ' a•O- O ��..fl y @ COa�7NO CQOJ� N O y 'C C O f2 E O co QQaa ` Z O Z oX 0) 0 m� e(-'. QuO � NO . — C � C m mU7N O Q = E C Z ZZ Z O pm O .ONM ._ C W W m Z Z J fomold.0) �. W 0 Z W � f° Zrn rc' mm, p pc � m pc o .« 0am Q W0 V" Q w Uc o00 v V a � ,_ a a � o a 42 v _ amo L N � 7 _ N w O (U C m C • N t a C ~ C f0 O U _3 a ao�+ C O W N d m E O �' j .O N �` d - r+ ' O a' Cw mN 7 OU� J JJCDmO �C N7 0 LU f�6 = O o — E ?• — f .., 1 COL V O CV) U C C C C CO mm Q c JLt I]:L C : 'iJtiR Ma °� ma� C• f 1 i . >. c' DL m o c � w .r , � U c U CO C N G N 'y _. m N m p N Q N C E p a a N . U a? 0 a ' cm . m m a O c v y 3 (n Q 0 U N CD N -p G c p 0 a g m u o o m q c m a m w o Z; > > c a� c c o c °. p U U N c U x c m ' 3 p = p.. a m 3 - H Z Q -Ie Z Q = iri z'•�' ° c Z. o wm"o w > W .!2 C N Z c c Z o c m Z w 2U Z p mLLI O Q w m U m Q W O U 'o CL IxQ a a IN Q E w _ ' M m mw m m m a c H C A. L. r c O o w . M o U > N U = _ .°� O � uj -j 20) a fill. Ic � SSS. i ➢ r!O>L,>74 i�lif35 >1 i :r+} �a. T ( rF _Y: t4t.ilt mt MUNI ' � � 0 7 tm / u ck D � 0 oS (D Ca CaCL � § . \ k C%j k $ § § C c � om £ mcc E o / z \ 5 0 S § - m2 m 0 k � ° % 2 zoa 0 Fkk Lu uj� 0� � Z < G cm a gH2 � E CD 2 Cc .0 . = e � \ M LU \ . . ® \y. � � 4.2 Bicycle Collisions In general bicycle collisions have been on an upward trend over the past six years, however in 2004 ' bicycle collisions were down.There were 50 total bicycle related collisions reported in 2004, 7.4% lower than the previous 12 month period and 4% lower than collisions reported in 2002. Table 4.4— 1999-2004 Bicycle Collisions ' Total Reported Year Bicycle Collisions on Public Streets Bicycle %Change 1999 52 2000 - 46. -12% - - -- 2001 45 -2% - 2002 _52 _ +13% 2003 54 - +3.7% ' .2004 50 -7.4% Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database The study's method of evaluation follows the recommendations of the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by which bicycle collisions are classified according to their collision type. The FHWA's Classification system includes 38 different collision types of which only 16 occurred on City streets in 2004. In general the majority of factors contributing to bicycle collisions in 2004 were driver error or cyclist error. Table 4.5— 2004 Bicycle Collision by Type & Fault Number %of Cyclists Position Severity Collision Type of Cases Total Sidewalk J.-Road _In ary Fatal PDO Motorist Right Turn- In Front.of Cyclist. 6 12.00% _ _. . 0 6 5 0 . 1 ' Motorist Left Tum-Facing C dist 6 12.00% 0 6 6 0 0 Cyclist Lost Control _ _. 6 12.00% 0 6 5 0 _ 1 - -- - - .- _ Other Not classifiable __ _ 6 12.000/0 0 6 6 0 0 Drive.OutAt.ControlledInt ersection 5 10.00% 0 5 5 0 0. Motorist 0 ens Vehicle Door. 5 10.00% 0 5 3 0,- 2 Wrong Way Cyclist 4 8.00% 0 4 4 0 0 Drive Out From Lane or Driveway 2 4.00% 0 2 2 _ _ 0 . . 0 _ Ride Out At Controlled Intersection 2 4.00% 0 . _ 2--- ___2 0 0 Cvclinq While Under the Influence 2 4.00% _ 0 2 ] 0 1 Motorist Left Turn-In Front of Cyclist —1 1 2.00% 0 1 1 0 0 Motorist Overtaking-Bike Path Obstructed 1 2.00% 0- -1 _ _ __1 _ 0 0 Motorist Overtaking-Failed to Detect 1 2.00% 0 1 _ 1__. _ 0 0 Motorist Overtaking-Misjudged Passing Space 1 - 2.00% 0 1 1 0 0 ' C Gist Right Turn In Front Of Motorist 1 2.000/6 01 0 0 1 Ride Out From Lane or Driveway 1 2.00% 1 0 -- 1 0. 0. 50 100.00% 1 49 44 -- -. 0 6 Source: City of San Luis Traffic Collision Database - r r Party at Fault. _ 2001 _ 2002 . _ _ 2003. 2004 Bicyclist 25 56% 31 -60% :31 57% 21' _ - '42% __ Driver _ 20 44% 21 40% 23 430% __58'/0_-- -- -- Total: 45. 100"/a _- _ .52-- _ _ 1000/6 =- 5 100% - 50 100% t 21 C L O - -� 3 O _ - -- O m C ui OC NUs U -N O O O L •O U .N Q U a) w CIS >1L .0 m O C O CD O T C O N O y N m N .O > 7 N _C O C C a N . y U m L m 3 O to _ ILD a) O O O R •j O `' C C O aS O d C y U 'C C E a) �' 0 7 Q•w C In Jr- a) fa_ O M a) G 9 ia) 0 N O c) C E N p a) rn CIS m0 YC C EDOCL C O U iI- to . a) A OO .n Z _ to s a) 9 OO N O275 2 U p� ` � u p c 7 — m o C � - O p p :. Z Z 0 �_ rn Z Z o nso �o o LU = ar c3 Z r W Zioo . C F- Z $ 0WppU p 0 � .sy c a w °' v � a w v O a =r—t5 y a � = a m a Q � C ~ o (1) Ia. 0 o U •p c CL a) (� - cm of o o) o) a L N U 3 O O m c0 N ` O O O Q 3 m Q .` O N .O tf1 ' � (D N C ty C N C as In p) U O aas L O .' N O 4) .0 �. CL a3 > N 7 ' 7 N N C Q O R i W p O W N — O J Jp G' J SfA d' � y o :T-? - --- - ------ - __ N U f`a U `p Y L N O ' � � -- M y � �' it •ri ._ i �;• rt. CD O O V a) 'in y 1. o = a t o o 46r - a a 10 o o y . (OC N l04 C N C y 00 O .. G. �+ O. C O C 0 ' U U U V c 3 m c W C C O U p U CD C U ` O i O CD ui O N .00 .".. y O — N c O — N cc -. .H C Z UO c Z UO 0 . 0 O �, E O E _ S2 N_ CL Z Z 0 7 Z Z O 3 W U S; LU U c w ix a Z o �, Z o. W0 low 00 w OU a ixN Qm a ixN Qm . �a c6 O to CD to m m cit � 0 Ix ^. � 0 � ' O r_. Ocis r cc m C13 w IL) _ >J LL U ) J a<. s. Y � C m � � C C C C_ f6 C 3 rn 40 w m - m U m V V Y m �. Mn m 0 m Z o C ch V) - ch > C w L E m — c O •� m •_ x m Z Z tin j Z r W C CD N W Z `m O O.c Qoa L) c. 1 c � Y C C +' to N O N r 0 CN W 1 7 IJ J Q' 7 F {t s ;tyzz-. L. FF •. I K� wog -oo N C N O (�4 E C_ O Q A 'E 78 N 8 N w W 3 a m m Y Q O y E, ETy m d m Q> — "-E c`acZQ � � $ r m a) CDm d a c o o m o m to O = y m m C U C _ O. Z N � � N o " Cmi d d c (a C V �~ N d V N 0 N N N N O - Z in a3 > W m m m C m .y y c -a > C 'pw m = > c- aLi a'=i m m _O C co C C O m C(a 0 > > > M C- o C y 0- y m m m m ma o c @ m o 0 0 0 o m m m cm N 3 � EU dmm a O m °' a ni co co N o �;�- f0 !Q d vmm 3 W -2 = = � L N ~ ¢ m O m N m 875 LJ. M N N m O. m m 0 0 0 O C m a'�O, m 0 v aO N O y y O m to N m Cc CL Q> Zomv' ; a 0do m m E; N O o fl.;. != > U o ¢` 3 3 3 y L 7 C U O N C a N m m m m m O ~ :2 N C O 0 0 E 16 .120 Q c m co E m O 0) 0ami ami o O E m o o s ro o o, ai o N to y to a 0 CLm C 1 U v> C r E ami m a v m m ami E = f6 o ai Co m c s a -6 p� 0 U-2 L) u u E s a N > > c N m > > c0 a � Fm . C o 0 � 'at � > N, C Q y 3c s m so ; 8 X88 0 d O myE ++ mE m 0. y a) v0 d m d 'La r an d (D m 0 a m m m - t m - m m m as o ,•, 3 3 3'U 3 _ 3 3 3 — O N O m C .� a 0 p. U O N C O C d C C N -C C_ C .�Q+�(. • N o7F2a> rH0 �O 0 oUm as o8c =O m o v io nmm CLC wR m ` F N HC C13m CCO N Q W N > C1 C it 7 U Cne .C. OOC • j_ 7 �. t6 N o O O O > m C � Ua F� m 0 m > d in U ea m 0 �> 0 C.L Z Y m A to 0 '6 a r m` O w 'a cc a N m E " I " o ow i U a m O " Q v a ao m N N cc j5 Nc a` o i U W L E7 j� c r 0" o V o t O y _ 7 V w C V Wcn m N c U a. m moa c I �. o 3 Q c c m m E `a° m ca yCD >o >o 0 ? 2 Z t .r 2 m p in cn m Co d Z c r c uN, E E E E C CL E m m m c m c_ o .= � (n _ m w > c E in m m m m m CL 0 1A U c m m m O = .>, a� m y o cn c O mC p C C 2 c N� dcr 0 0 V1 s m E to E (Dc ?am c v N Z L L m = m o o Z p > .x cy c c ..... .r V N N to ata '� '� q H ; ca c m ip m '�CIS .0c m ca n c c c o U c ° 3 C ami m m L N y •L •.Z99 m m c � ct � � m a E E v rr a s �. in o minx cc E E E z �l `ap v a o a -0 'LL U U x o 'c -ovm U 'aa ca W N m a� m d m a a a b a d m ma d ' m c ro > > > aa m n� .� ` 0 E 'cam vvv � � O t E E E E �` 0 '_ :9 «° ; W 01i9 � m � wX � o cm3: FIX > >Cl a c c c c � 3 Ecl > > � ¢ `¢ ¢ ¢ (D I - a - Er E •+ p d U � C N E U > M d C C Q O m L cmCL E mCL E o c E a CL E m m to OO` > .o m m CL.m =• m 2 m a m > m o m v •- to o _ m o to o mmccc m v m o °.3 >�>> E m E � � N. C m — > o O O C m m m y O m o "" t cc O E m a O c LL 61 `y J 0) W m > -� U �- F � to E t o m Eco v =—E Q c S ami a° m im x d > to y W o L o v c y > 2 o m c A=20 9 Q v . ay cr. O� c d to U m Z o r N .r h CL t o a E m c x t6 "0.-0 ,� o as ea o a O E m c N a6 t c w c3 W a 0 !A m o ea aS Gi LL 2 > . m m ata ca a N ,a C O cC E O O .� ` C �. t U O 07 3 C:5 CL to N ll G O m N N C IL N L m to 6 co >c = t L @ m m m p oy m d of tco o o o o o in g U a w i) U U a 'o CL 3 z0 � aU,r- � P 1 0 0 oc —>'cr- > oc � YCo Na C N .V C ON - U 0C O C E N a a O U D O a) 0 a) N 3 0 0 C *: m U t0 E O w 3 0 a) O 3 N 'Ca .Q N09 0Y O O O 0- t Q 0 + CL L- W 11 Q) OS � 0aE :3 :.o L .7coa� C O > CC I.- (DI 3 -C O O a E O U .� �' a3 f-' :_ C N C1 F, V r-: a) to U in L) Q) �. E N 4) «. ca 0 0 0 " 0 y t �0,.— E y C 0 "' O C 'a O U C p p O E C a):•- p O 'a w O p M o.t.'a U = t9 .. O N «. E Z_ y U CE 0 M p) 0 w a) aQ0 x " E C y C y (D C F a) a. o '- ON.w U 'D 7 �O t o a) C CLO 0 �'. N (D C C a7 to _ Z 0) O a U p ., a) 0 a7 U '� O O L. O a N E U `� C O fa 0) 0 . p U_ �p C fa a M N N 0 0 X r N M C LO t0 r- 00 0 O 0 m p N N V 3 X X X X X X X X X X E a C 00 .�0.. m C O fl. p, Z C C C C'C C C.C�a C N E - 0 O >•, W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O = .A C C C � 'a 3 ,.., d 0. aaaaaaa-aa C U M 0 j � 0 O a m 0 a a a a a a a a a a a (A= (D a) U c u w m a) O .. Q QQQQQQQQQQ W C L p y o `,0C U > E m fa - (`a Q. a) 3. L C CD 00 0 0 w N - C U m t i:. .,.. d. C 02 v3 G a) .0- 0 0 N N .0 > U m 7 C H to 'a N —U C :. ` 03 0 C N p Z VJ- = C=cc 6 '- O 0 3 0 r 2 U uj E = Ev, = Lw_ aop O � COy 0) " p .0 ` O C C +� aS o � r ED C m M = C a) of c a Z O O N O o O C m °it mL m > U .S =3 O � aa)). 0 0) m o r`n � -- � 3 a) >, ctoi • � o F- 0 � w00M 0 lA C U) 0 . 0..� y �. m M p fl V) 4? -C W L 4?. 0 C m C Q U 0 = y m tea A) O 0 a) a a) a.a O Ul c O C U C m C C 0 w L C E O w O N tll' C > = 0 a a) O H 0 'U N a) C V 0 3) C p o w , - 3 () () 0 a) Z _) a) O p r- CM 0 a) N C .. .0 0 L 0 O 0 N N 0 - Y C O 0 V 0 C a) CD O) = 0 Ot Q -.- O �, � ,� 0 p cn QU =. 0 O p .- (A 0.N m E C E •a o U a 0 U O J — *6 O t6 cp > a N " a) " a) C a a) to m m U U �, L tC U +' N > 0a) a) U a) a)� C W CC. Ca) 0m0i4) m U 0 O O C E N 7 � AD C C p U '3 d a) 0 - U 0 a) = 3 —a > 3 a� '0 C a0 ° 1- Q4QUU � 000 as d E Q. C 0 C -0 � � .0 r. c N to y. ( y'� COrr air f 6 c y y w C JU U U m N U N N O O O tp!`1 y c c p N m E (6 m -0 N V > a) y O = c CR m .0 s s v- m > a N c 7 U . . U M c O y m p r M d 0a) 0.:., p .r., y - N _ 7 l4 30 � � � � � `° oCLQ ENOU (607 � oaaiaaED= Co c ni N `p ,� m r O-r.;> N -Q O Q N (c6 tm c m " C CLy H O N O_.._ O O O ` a d O O w O t0 fA '- y . N :3 QN O 0 C y o C > c O c U y 0 0 (0 .gyp- ,� 0 -0 O C N 7 Q= m y 0 - .O f0 .p C E O N d c O 3 H m O = N C U O.Q y � CD N 3 .D U C C m O (0 N- o y C CD c cri cm 3 `D � t � 3 (DO °' 3 c 'o 0 N (�° y C OC U) O c o fl N a y 3 0 0 tU6 O .N N .p f�6 d C U (D m U) -E U y = C as U E OCw C .o ._ c �� y C71 (1 U � O O U O C N 0 0 w CO •U F y - •,. {0 yam, C m (p C c N m c- O . M C = r N ro o a E ,c O > _ 3 m aa� > c = c = flg ° COOS popeo •y � a•«.. _ U „ N _ cEE- o0 c y m >. v :: r m im (D f9 4) (D c O t: . O y (4 a M a. m a O c H) Q) O y N y •O a Co- � 2y3 ppo) cNMam N p E O > r O - N m U U Q.t 7. - rnU vcwtm c'3 m c' y c C y y �3„ N N N .Q. N . cO fl w. a) a E m N T a y CO C c c fA W fC N o _c • •u? y rn3 me rn � � - ... - � 3 � 0. any Ea •f° y m c o c o m a o c E Q o 4) t ci c o n. -o 0 N � (D'M Co U .E L 3 �o c 00 1 . w f 7f . ' ' 0 $ kc / @ - R C § ' f . ®$ 0 , f D 7 3 )\ ` � 5 76 tu c f k . 2 ' J 2 q 7 §m � 2S c ` � D . C) . CL © c 0 g a @ . 7 § % k . f <§ ƒ / � \ . 2 S 6 § 2 c ■ o a k J D » $ ` & ' / / . e . ~ B . �k « R . . e t Kf 6 2 2 7 . > co z � 0 (D > o ° & . o ■ 2 c 2 � < 2 ' < 4 a / ' / # . , . & 0 ®0 t $ 2 § \ 00 : ®cm z � § \ z ACL \ § . 0U \bL k0 . �0 : m k�k k r c IL o 2 « § . 41) ' ¢ � - 7 ' ¢ a & : § 2 430 # » § § < ■ 2 _ £ § % . - S 2k 2 $ t �.. �ji,;\ ® /.�y -K\q e«• . g a: � Z � 0 ` .a T� V/ IL N d 7 C) C U °a O O o w VC N N o. c O C _.o rn > 0U 'a .— ,op C mw � x CM o lY :3 .J a O O O t0 - Q Ln <� N i c .0o = c"a '> N N 'tD m N H C- C C N V N C C C: O .L N m ` m p@ O C C•M O zcm E N U I m r N O C a m > U — - m Z = a o s Z. c a� CD Z Z N N C. 0 O Z * 3 C U Z, N V. m.6 U 0 ui 0 O 0 w 0 Q W �O ~ Lu U H M � R CD ~ .� w CWC m 'Q C C N O C w C M O 'N'(n O b r QS O� SQ. r C � y I f:f li: iC� •gill rlj L6 C) C a .o .. - L 3 . Z G p c%i Z . U Q � Q m N w = W wQ ttJ O (n C r p�.0 +cc. C- x��� 1713!' i2tS5 E 0 E C m a D ca O CC Q CO H m C13 CL C 3 m' o o O 0 o v) in _to c o O U) o o V ` ` >_ _ 0 o U L '�0 4r Z U O U 2 N0 O L6 J _ - 3m d 3 0750 d C ' C im ccn O - C t Co E > U o °' O rn cc aN Z o.. H m 5 o m i O N m fl. C C N N I' = rn O .. ._ d O CL o s m CAm72 0E c a > Q ~ woc E c O m Z ,. U fnpc om ° a 0 OL m a3 oD F. :9 U E __ c c •N Z 0 f0 O m 2 0 eq CL m .N CM Q W r �. > O Z O V Zcm o y Z W V m y Z dm w S` t;; z O o O om O (' O O - U ` -- - a - a U N ~ a E Q c.Z LL o a O CD cc o Sa rz o > m > a� o m O 8 N .. C W O N M O O O d .Or = va m E vw Jam ffl{t 1:, f,S� - •SS CID MIN i r r - 0 _ o w O _ A G C C O U O N O N L -a1 Q . •O N �I10 0 i Z O C Z p E N Z O d Z O m Q• Q m m H c Z a Z U) a c� Z W V Z LU U W W H U 1- �~. U o H CO) M d c m c a > @ W d g o rami o ami N fn 00 m .. Cl) y +m+ IL it a: _ �p i L' .r.. `� \ :.\tet•...11 h�, •.�i?J;1 It 3A�/?: F� r r ui L C ris N C N O C O Z E v y Z O :a Q O Z Q Q M O Z W U Ix m Z O CL Ix a u� O m to IL m °« of d w o w, u 0 coo m E + 0 o m " m S min wo yV •..11 I_ is ._tziss it�'lt r � m O m U, � N O O N U O C L m.U O .r . Of C Co j - C rn O i 0 > O O 0 m O ►+ U y C) N 'S 'wi N N CL C J M co U C O Q O cc Z O m U C O 0 o flJ O N u1 N O Q = m Q O C 'n Z U -C Z LO !L Z OC Q z W U Z W U �i 0) Z z 2 = C w z W 2b z Q W V d OD 0 W o V a a: Q CL 75 O ` C y N i W W c4 tC N > �. yC v C.� �- V i N a- C N O w W+ �+ Uf O N to O w N C A U LL 2.0 N E c= Siii �SS 0 O N 7 O tmt a L6 t w C O ' U y - ` O O O N L -�� a a o V to O O 0) O Z E _ '2 L y 0 tUA O Z Z 0 Z Z U g LLI z Ix g z W 0 .0 0 0 a ui w a T -� Ix a O O w O wN m W O �,w LU 'd9 U 10 i 1�4 � U � 0 R cm y Q m 0 ,0 N C m W i.� me D 0 ca O O N t O U 'p f9 C C 0cr � N 0 .6 C O f6 N Co . W N V y SU c X C13 0 .5 p c� ,r (n o t my CDtm co p U .0 N N N $ �p f0 C 0 C M m O O > 07 Z C p O E >Z a' O m Z ; y p c Z 3 Q ,,E d Q X - m Q O im N ZU m co R Z W c c U Z w c o Z fY VLU 0 Y 0c (DN W zO.Q Q w cc ¢ w v o CL Lo tu .o o c . X m w °..' w 7cc cc > d p c y +n g d o c p o ` d O 'a y N d +: e4 W O m .0.. N r . c U.J Si1Je:S <= i �f�is lt] � •..- j� <a(2lii � 1 3 .1 iia r` fir.. �. i]' i�r • , r 1 U N CL CL m m m g v� E o cn r2 tri m i y m > o L N (� R N C a 3 o m m° c E O `- U y Z O i m cr O Q U Z W m O r� O c W � _ 0 c. Q W m U a w > a- co _. U W , m D W C. m ,O N d W tJ1 4 C w l4 C. W i d O O O wC F1 M U fn W r m 1 i a CD •a' � illicit ' t€ ni 11 • I �I. 'N L �.. O � U O ' CN U O CCCf -' - N L a 3 C O " X 0LU •N " c>i Z rn NC _ In O Q i ", C .�, N O Q1 CV N N. d '�- cf) O .. if; d C. C O � CN C Z Q (n Z O` w.C 0 O Vl «. `p N 0 CD CS Q CV O O Q E O W c^ Z N > E Z Z o ci Z LU 0 LUU c0 Z LLJ U > Q W vi U O Q W U N C H o U m N C _ i C Ca„G m C R - dj O d m m CU > O VS w W WO) (D W CA U O R � U O CO �V � ` O � .O m O. R w � O wt0 L d N � L 7 y CO (6 = V C. W c U W O C — _ j i3 'j �;jj e IT s. t.... F� o— - 1 o > A, - o E 3 N C ' � O U Q.2 m C) Q C c 3 II> N I t4 C p C i..- 3 5 U 01 >:'O tmN RO O � @ fl y a) O E"0"E- G m U C w-C .-. c "EL _ ` Cl t 'C 0 C N Y5 N ca F' aUi nm a ° a E Q cm ca c n o (n N = Z 3 O — C Z O CL> t3 N E b Y E 3 Z .2 c v Z o 08 .2 0F- c6 m Q cE C O :2, o N Z ENZ z c W z o uta U ZW _C co ca Z 3 Ix 2 Z O "'o O'O> FWF O > H U UF- W V Q W " 1 IL w. ¢ a Q N C ,►+ N O U = m r Y d Y td i c .+ w. Q1 C U) Qj C: 49 m � o mN 'a > Od a > O 4� W — 4) W N m is p`� t4 N. M e0 O y CO ea H � C mto mC7 Wim: c ulG' Wc- -- - -- -- C CP flip i � � 0 k % _ / EE c 2 . � 0 \ a \ c 0 0 CL tE tm 2k a o § c0 c \ k ate_ LL q a 2 ƒ: 2 cm 0 \ C e o k P c e 0 § o m a CL m MbLU 2 § > 2c \ z � \ m o $ § ui 0 w 0 ix § z ■ 2 z uj g w o0 ¥ UJS v � k \ U CL ■ m « a ■ a e « n _ P E § c 2 c -ccc Ix $ ) 2 � 0W 2 � k � 2 ■ E vw LU cm k \ 2 � \!± _ ZE � d lD O CD CL C C _ C Z L Z O Z Z o Z w � I � � Z FW~- V H - LU Y y I C m U) (J vI cD D W L ` Mr W O O W m � i 1 1 N V L y O 1 C N Q N C cm `O C to .2 O cc N 1 y E Cy O a O O v o o O U ` C N N O N O O L O Z V C O C J E LL E � > SO Z � O ZC O 0 -30 Z N o. m Q N cO Q v c v 1N Z U C O. Z Z N O LU ca U W U :? g Z � r z w O w O = O c. Q w m U a w o U CL wa a a � ac _ - -- a rn cm CM W m L ;[ > Y t f6 OJ w O a M . � O . L U. V. N y�W .. .0-� 1w4 d .. N !w0 O !w6 . 1 N � � � � LE O O G c'3 c G W � V Wtwo _ ii_x tc.. m .. H - --- -- CL - - - - - CD a i O y U (6 umi a d O G U O to r (0 wto N uj C C U ' N O d0 W U , N fQ m _ C !n N O O O Q p O . otf U N C N L 7 Vl (6 O r C C ' c O d .O O CO p cc .Q U O j Q 0 E m O N o_ m o 3 m Q = O Q O »•- � Z Z O Z ' W N' LLI O U OE O O d 1 nom. � cw Q a � o CO) to 0 C R tC0 Cad R �, toa ca 10 m W U C m d f6 C W W 1p y w E � O _E2 p y v ' op U. W E.0 w u'. ai cw E O U � N G p m > > a) ` > O.0 9 3 @ N . 'C � a C Nc O to - O C C m -Cto 0 C Q to CO O. C tC i t 0. N � .f6 N_ C w N C - ` O > C1 yj O C" O � O N m O E m CD 3 E m Z O 'C z O cn O " m d O e) m Ca F=, c m m Q rn m Q o -0 v'n C Z O z2 U z it Z> W y W ai z v Z 2 . � . c Z m Z 0 LU °' O W O _ O c� � O Q (D o F- LU rn a 0: c Z Q IL EY Q w " c it ca O O y0 4 W d ! U _ i W U i C R W m a - w0.. NOD W y La C SZ Wc. ui WLo fill!= i ca ca c 3 m o O L Q oma+ EC aL L 2 O O O LL ry. N O L C c 'C�.. >.•f6 c E O L U L m C O.X ca OL D O E a) N 0-N U U �w„ m y a )m L L m E o .. O cc .— E ro .0 C N U Y -co 0 tm cm j •D'. p p C O E .. C. C: U Z 0.Vi L .. O CLC 5 tL U) + Z Qui ZL O U') N O L O +, N J fL6 _a O E ca H O O mm a � C � CD m a 0 C N > �� N U T Q Z W O O I— = Z U O _ZU m N Z c W N O c �. w L O L N F- w. - C e- N cc m O > °a 'O O U 0a W V d � N eo W C N 3 E E2 O 4) � N N O O O N � cc C = W C _ t}f i ca .. -P. ..• O .3 CD C cm O _C U � 7 Cc U � � N 1 - � N C > C CD o E _ 0 c m cv mL6 U 0m 0 J N E N Z �� t _ 0 tq y in � y O C � a O O t6 ' O N Z.0 V m Q in Y CO Z c o U It = Z O LU 0 U �•,V H V m d LU cc c�a ¢ � c � � O Y r LU �. ■ m O y 0 c � fY Wlo . a'_ Is Mill 0 i� 0 0 U l0 W Q C O O O d Cl y N C C N O C O m O O O m Z O m U 0 c E E z o z o 0 c O F 00 z° o a o z 0 z 0 zLU U Z uj c U I■ z Ix � z z WO Lu c o F~- 0 F= 1~— U E CL a m cot ac)c rn � Y V e- G ` N O 6) m m 6 m O C V .�+ O i m Y O O Q � t0 /0 CIQ w � i ate w aci r m tam aci � � A � o E EN E � o E ^ N = tC d m N eT !n LU C9 co Z v LL! r C Sri i { j ,7{itis y :7{e t�t (fl E"' i t r 0 tN C N N H y O t6 o ia� o m tri a C N N til O C ... CJ -v .�.. p C N 'L .0 Nr- 0 O m O .Q 0 : .z 0 > E C ' > ZN O i Z O d Y 07 X � 0 � c � a Z .0 o z Z o `r r W W � � � z 2 z r m o w o a tea, a a w v a 0 Y V V t'7 O � O C c coO Y c m c LoH � � Of r. Cl) 'a t E � O 'pM l7 V t0 Cc CA 2 Lu r CD m LOU i in L Q RCL C � O 0 N Z o Z LUui U Ix 0 i ¢' W U � o o) r w c CD - cc o c vJ O 22 a) 0 ea rn u z. Lo N C o W p co 'L m V i tC � i •+c. i� t — L N a C CL O C13 t H Z' !1• N 0 �N Op .. •j N N QCL C N C N 'C O N C .Q O 'C O �! Z Oc Z o N - N E rA p LD° zo 0 - p Z W U Z W o U W Z � z. WO W O E a Ix Q a Q Cl) ` ^ Y ^ fD M C pj O- ' ix le w to C fpm C t0 OE EO .a N V NQ Mpp d RQ fA C f/O O �- W r cn d W r . •S � I ``i flrsSs H E L6 c L6 CN CL -.fl p O p O c Z. O c Z O' d0 N 0 Q -W O O ~ ~ C Q c O. Q c Z Z W0 Z O Z Z Z W 0Fr 0 w 0 IL a a a W a Y . M W Q7 Co 0s C G w ca wN � � Z' I >3 •t' E E C W V _ — - m N to N C1 O W CO). M a W r- U) 2 m`= W w i- 34 mz t ( L � . ui N .� N I`6 C CL N C O N O O Z o N Q -O N F- 7 Z Z O z W U It 2 Z O a wCD Q" o C L l4 C R +�+ 0 Ow rn ea o R 0 o WLd } ..0 +SII ZIL 1; c rn a� to O C v m a c>s c LO 0 U 7 y C O U C CD - U N N �" C CL CD P O :5 C C6 O C � - O Z Z Q c vT z _ O w N W t, y 3 c Q W O C~3 a� a Ix E Cm Y Co r O ftf C� m go ix O Y O C) r m c aci yr a � O C t0 C o aa) m O y U W co N � �•3713�T- it •T i:!,i T CC) 'S. t4' 1 dppe-nom ' Arterial / Arterial Intersections r r r r r r r r r i rnrn rnornlOv (1)0Iq CD o"vomi, 1,0v � ! m r Cp O r O CD O U) N T V Q_ Imo, r M U) r M Q . fA V CZ La r U) V' C7 r � O CI N c0 Z. � r co m c0 f` r n Z 1_ N N V V r l CO O M t CO c0 a V V O ,N 1_ N - cD CD cLO 0 V O O 0N U) � B O O COO 'O N"U) 0 m Q U) co 0 In" o MoQ o U) o Z co Z' N O C n I- N O 0) N O. CIO M I- N N O Mr.: N C9 Iz C) N r 0 Cp U) VC - - CD U), r n m N 0 r r r r r r T T r r V U) co - U7 O co O N co M !- O V I- co co 9Z I-- ND Cr:)� P- u zw) zzzzz � V- - MZOCOO, nM. mm r- CD m CD O O c0 CD CO U) M 'r �N„ - W tnD CO Z Z Z. C? C`7 z 0 CMI C 1 N w N T m OctMC' f0 0 w Z Z N P. N CD M C7D N.. W r U) W M M CO Q) r co N��y - LLCL r 0 0` 0 o 0O` V U' 0 C7 C7 'U' U' C7 0 N O V5 !n (n V3 (Q {n fn Fn U5 fn Cn Cn Cn Cn to U m m rn 0 (n !D m rn U U. V pl T O O r- U) N w O w CD r CC) o M N O w VO +_ m o M O N Q O M M CT L CA r- r,- r n I,- n CD CD CD CU U)" V V M M N T Ir CN 0 00 0 6 0 0 OO O O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 nV r C7 CD U) CO CA V O r O to C) 00 CO O O n CO h r V' C>0 N a E m M N0 r MCOM W M O C-- P- I� M V N O O M 000 M V N noV CMMCOorno00LOM .W00Nrnrnon" oco 0) N C M V r C - r r M O U) r I- Cn C) CA CO T V" O N C% I� CD V' h 1- Nr M r a= N M N N N r N N N N' M N LO N M N 'M N'N M '� C a O (n N r.- � r nO N I- C) CO U) >` co co n m O' r. U) CD Cn CO M M M O U U C m m M CD m m rn a> umi f0 rn m c o tp m @ E c c � � � � o � � oit c > � '9 � ro � > o a � � � 20 O v =° � r uc0mo " cvmmxomy .m3LL � o cc c cm �. O vi m Cp m otS m m CO CO O Y Y; .a 2 . -C c O m = 0 ON o m02m � � ois �,0 m � m � c cc m ,6 Q .cc ca otS atS aiS uZS J (A o a0 �S.,�y m m p m N E- U m O m a m CA'S c�f J O` c. m Z m J a 0 T 2 = L `O O O` ` m N of O CONI m 7 r "y = O atS 3 a 2 Cap r cu aj oU = too oi3 -Oi2 = 30 � � o "= m` 2m 3 V. U �= O = N O m = Q 3 x a s a a a C m p) Cp Y Y Y; Y Y > M O N N M r co r N r N N N ^ r - � N ! 0 .0 O O O IL z z Z z z Y 2.01/MEV Marsh & Santa Rosa 17 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 II� I 0310112004 13: 11!19/2004 19:5 05 �..:,8 04126!2004 11:41 8 1 0 ' 10/2012004 21:09_Jm 06127/2004 16:48_.7 i 05!1512004 10:36_„ 11/0W2004 ts:ao 1 oel0112o0410:02 , ' 04/2212004 10:os_ —" ,X o212aQ= 1221_,, 12128/2004 20:30 o� ¢ 02124/2004 19:50. ' ,.0611412004"%.rR/2Q04 14:00 ------, 08122/2004 17.00_4 I i ' I WifFRn-75'oRn-75'of Intersecton, accidents wth tnsu sent data tar display Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a= Stopped a . Erratic x Bicycle o General a Pole - Unknown c-v- Out of control Injury e; Tree al w Animal a–» Backing -i,,_ nu Right n Fatality 4.F Overtaking m-- Left nun Nighttime 3rd vehicle ' < Sideswipe r— U-turn < DUI Extra data 2000 1 1 .30/MEV Laurel & Orcutt 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 1.2/31/04 Al, --`01113/2004 18-.00 Otl2�3f20G0a4 11:13 0512&2004 654 -A,-03MI/2004 13A5 11/1812004 17:211� .01 Wi-EEn-75-0fliit-6ii7eiib—o—n�Oyia6rdiri&�WEiiis—ufSciih-tBa-g-far-aaPiam .4— Straight Parked >; Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle u General a Pole Unknown Out of control C) Injury a Signal m Curb <— Backing x,_ Right turn @,N Fatality m Trce Animal <-« Overtaking A� Left tam Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-tum DUI Extra data 58 1 .30/MEV Monterey & Santa Rosa 15 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 Y� m .... ....... s� o o' 01/1512004 20:05 11/2?12004 19:00 12/071200013:45 1029/2004 16:00 N R O o P_ v, O O O I O O 12r29n004 :1s:_y ...__._..._.__...—— _ . - - i n 75'of Intersec5on-f0laai nts mn insufficient or -I - �-- Straight t Parked _ Pedestrian Fixed objects: a-- Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o <;.nenl o Pole ' Unknown Out of control 3 Injury M Sipal W etun —» Backing ' Right turn G Fatality _. 8, Trec 31 Animal <� Overtaking e- Left.tum Nighttime 3rd vehicle ,-a— Sideswipe j,7— U-tum DUI y Extra data t59 1 . 17/MEV Chorro & Higuera 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ........... . I I �..._.._....... .. -- - 1227120.04 :00 i—04/IQ*0U 24MZ2004 1 05/1912004 928 L#1-, 05!3012004 20:12 c O LLLyTTTLLLAAA '. ........ r - -- - d m of Intersection,-(0)a=dents with insufficient data for diSplay ' 19 Straight r----,:Parked X Pedestrian Fixed objects -t.Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole. ----- Unknown <c�r Out of control 0 Injury a Signa o Cigb a=» Fatality ```. inimal Backing � Right-turn ;�; • Overtaking cr— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle. Sideswipe U-turn_ DUI Extra data 1 60 1.1 5/MEV Higuera & Johnson 5 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31 0 4 ...................... f—'03112=04 11:20 081112004 18:33 Wffn-7'6�Mordersecton, (0)acct encs%fith insufficient data for display a-- Straight =---- Parked >,/ Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped m,, Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole ' --- Unknown air Out of control Injury s Signal w Curb T -3 Backing Right turn C-._)i Fatality w rec Animal Overtaking Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-tum DUI I Extra data Intersenon Maac,er 6.GW P- P(==mm 1938. 61 dppenft 2 ' Arterial / Collector Intersections 1 1 - 1 - co (D O N NO c: <n r m �,.� O ._ M N O v 0 m N �,Z L1Z CF-, CE n '- (p (p CV 1 m M O O r- M co t0 ' O to rn (0 Q' co CF OI N a0I O (MOIC I-0 N N O? O N d' N t(7 (D M nZMQCD to V' toCDM mN.� -qf - 1 r- O O CD N M M CO C" M O r,,-,, co tD . j Q OI M Co O N 1l O N _O�O m O O t� OJI GO WO O) O N-O co tD U) OI (D a) M r to r- N O) CO N 0 N C 00 r C W ZO�zN z 'lc CO � Z. N COD1 CODON Z .- N CO . � N co Co tp 1 U Q c a 0- 0 (1) o (1) UmV5mm555mU5mECcn Q N r%) N �. N W M M N O O Hw O tO r 0W tO O O . Ow I-' W CO CO f0 (O to M in LD ,Zr M M M M •L Q,' C'i vi 6 c Otj OO GOO C G OO Ci a d Om r� NV) r cmvI- aoGor- rn m 1N Q � m , r-- U.) O 0 to r M m O N co C. 7 M tO M (D I� U) IT, O) O O. Q M Q .-- r- O O OCO CO N N W M N. COO N N N N U 1 °' C rte+ N O S tO � Q O M,tO Q n O tO M M M M � C 1 U � N � m 1 m m U O y fC W Cc 0 y ~Q� 0 C) =LmoC6 x 0 'p � L N (_a w 0_ .r " 7 V cd �' O of Q O O o_ � m a LLmpta � � ,aLL N c .otn � c -0 m y � � o -6 Foo'ca a m Q c r oc O to O o cc f0 c a 2 N L m 1 U V y mUM •oo tm:2 Mmm U)' M pm a f° — n ' � _ l11 a 0 .J' Y Y Y O C C. C C CL C C to N o M 2 `_ O d' Q to m CD CL z° z z° z° z z z° Y 3.88/MEV Chorro & Pismo 9 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .......... '—01J26r2004 17:MQ4r2004 03/2512004 12:15 13:35 9'061112004 23-45 052112004 11:30 I r-1 112112004 11:15 M04/2004 9:00 Yc-05117J2004 12:45 �-0509/2004 10:47 Within 75'at Intersecton, 101 aceidents mth insufficient data for disolav Straight o Parked 1". Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle n General 0 Pole El; signal w Unknown Out of control Injury m Trec k� Curb Animal Backing v,,_ Right turn Fatality �- Overtaking o-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle -z— Sideswipe U-turn. DUI Extra data 111111150.�. 64 3.73/MEV Chorro & Palm 13 Accidents 01/01/04 12/31/04 ............ N ! j j A uZ .r._�...._.__.._._... '� O . _y �-0710912004 16:49 02/112004 19:37 v N • 01120/2004 19:31 09126/2004 14:20 077042004 12:23_ o o e J R Cn 01123!2004 9M-0 M iY :.__....x.__.,_..._11/042004120 g - Wiffi— . I I i m o nerSecUon, aca ntsvn ensu cienf data for display __- . � Straight © Parked 1VPedestrian Fixed objects: .�— Stopped Erratic X Bicycle c Genenl a Pole -=-- Unknown ati Out of control Injury is signal © curb a-» Backing it,, Right turnFatality I).. 'Free � Animal a« Overtaking Left turn. Nighttime 3rd vehicle 1 0/-a Sideswipe - U-turn DUI Extra data 1 65 .83/MEV Pismo & Santa Rosa .5 Accidents 01/01/04 12/31/04 e � o o 03l0112004 14:30 '4._0212012004 14:02 1 1 r i i.......................................... _ _ _ - i....-........ ..........Within of Intersecton, acc n Wh insu anent clata.for display E Straight r�- . Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a--; Stopped -. :i., Erratic ,X' Bicycle �i uentrai n Yotz Unknown ate^ Out of control p Injury w s1�": ii curs a. » s Tree Animal Backin L, Fatality ighi turn Overtaking e-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a� Sideswipe U-turn -; DUI Extra data 66 1 1 .82/MEV Mill & Santa Rosa 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ' 0 11/2912 16 7272 1 O , Q apo � ( VAiFun 75'onn-ternection, 0}eec�dents will insufficient datao disc v ' a— Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: « Stopped Erratic X.Bicycle o General o Pole - Unknown a-,r Out of control Injury a signal o curb a-.. Backing s� Right turn Fatality .2 Trce Animal ' <- . Overtaking ,� Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a Sideswipe �D U-turn c, DUI Extra data ' 67 :80/NEV Broad & Pismo 4 Accidents " . 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 O A� i ja I r 1�1. ;i 04103x2004 15:14 12/02!2004 7:30 yR� s; I� I I Wi R 75 of-GtersecGon 0}aerrdenE-mtfiineuffiaent data k-r a lay - Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objecis: ' Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o Genesi o rule Unknown Kc-v Out of control ^: ln�ury a TM a( K Curb a—» mal Backing Right tum Fatality a Overtaking K-7 Left torn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a Sideswipe r— U-turn < DUI Extra data (g 1 Arterial / Local Intersections 1 1 . 1 , 1 1 1 69 Arterial / Local Intersections Prioritized by Accident Rate Rank Prev.Rank Intersection Collisions Volume _ Rate. Control _ EB WE NB SB 1 Not Ranked Foothill&Carpenter 3 4,500 1.83. 1-STOP NA 2,000 1.250 1.250 2 2 Monterey&Osos 7. 10,897 1:76 SIG 2,612 3,093 3,137 2,055 3 Not Ranked Broad&Higuera 9 16,567 1.49 SIG NA 9,650 3,417 3.500 4 5 Monterey&Morro 3 7,204 1.14 SIG 1,:47 3,093 51382- 112 5 17 Calle Joaquin&Los Osos Valley 8 20,916 1.05 1-STOP 8,838 10,268 NA 1 810 6 _ -11 __ _ _ -Osos&Pacific 6 15.714 1.05 2-STOP 1,395 1,395 9.580_ 3,344 7 25 Murray&Santa Rosa 12 37,844 0.87 SIG 2,172 2,172 16,750 16,750 8 Not-Ranked Marsh&Nipomo 4 12,846 0.85 SIG NA 8,846 2_000 2.000 9 37 Descanso&Los Osos Valley 7 22,896 0.84 SIG 8,963 12,533 700 .700 10 Not Ranked Marsh&Morro 5 16,435 0.83 SIG 12,939 NA 1.7481_,748 11 31 Garcia&Los Osos Valley 3 10,822 0.76 1-STOP 9;329 10,422 NA 400 12 Not Ranked Higuera&Osos 4 14,548 0.75 SIG NA 7,295 4,489 2.764 13 15 Higtiera&Nipomo 4 14;622 0.75 SIG NA 8,846 2,888 2,888 14 21 Higuera&Vachell 5 19,043 0:72 1-STOP NA 1576' 8,302 9,165 15 23 Montalban&Santa Rosa 9 35,593 0.69 2-STOP 500 1,593 16,750 16,75 16 Not Ranked Elks'&Higuera 4 T6,604 0.66 1ST60 1,500 NA 6,875 8,229 17 Not Ranked Bullock&Orcutt 4 16,624 0.66 1-STOP 7,671 7,753 1_,200 NA. 18 Not Ranked Marsh&Osos 6 25,215 0.65 SIG 12,939 NA 9,580 2,696 19 35 Higuera 8,Suburban 5 22,482 0.61 SIG 5,015 NA 8,302 9,165 20 22 Meinecke&'Santa Rosa 7 35,077 0.55 2-STOP 1.577NA 16,750 16,750 21 33 Los Osos Valley&Royal 5 27,752 0A9 SIG '11.816 12,899 2.037 1,000_ 22 39 Higuera&Pacific 4 23,668 0.46 1-STOP NA 1,000 15,385 7,283 23 Not Ranked Los Osos Valley&Los Verdes 3 17,799 0.46 2-ST60 8,995 7,704 500 600 24 42 Olive&Santa Rosa 8 47,568 0.46 SIG 11,113 3.000 16,705 16,75 25 1 Madonna.&Pereira 3 17,905 0.46 2-STOP 8,073 8,770 1,062 NA 26 19 California&Taft 3 18,284 0.45 1-STOP 3,,000 NA 7,234 8,050 27 Not Ranked Cuesta&Foothill 3 18,459 0.45 1-STOP 8,893 8,066 NA 1_,500 28 Not Ranked Diablo&Los Osos Valley 3 19,392 0.42 2-STOP 8,963 9,745 353 331 29 29 Grand&Loomis 4 29,257 0.37 1-STOP NA 3,925 12,666 12,666 30 44 Boysen&Santa Rosa 4 31,000 0.35 1-STOP NA 11000 15,000 15,000 31 40 Leff&Osos 3 24,831 0.33 2-STOP 650 9_50 8,033 15,498 32 36 Santa Rosa:B Walnut 3 30,389 0.27 SIG 2,232 8,559 8,097 11,501. 33 Not Ranked Abbott&Grand 3 31,011 0.27 2-STOP 3,929 11750 12,666 12,666 34 - __ 32 Oak&Santa Rosa 3 34,200 0.24 2-STOP- NA 700 16,750--16.7 50 1 10 1 1 .83 / MEV Carpenter & Foothill ' 3 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 --7"06111l2006 1110!1 WON 1441 :45 1 1 8:52 i ' i n 75'of Intersecton, a=dents with insu icient data or is a Straight r---- Parked ," Pedestrian Fixed objects: a— Stopped �x, Erratic X Bicycle a General 0 Pole ' - - Unknown a-tir Out of control c, Injury Eq sural W Curr a—•- Backing Right turn e Fatality m Trec �k Animal OvertakingLeft turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle ' Sideswipe— U-turn -1, DUI ,: Extra data , 1 71 1 .76/1\4EV Monterey & Osos 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 �osrosr 10;50 O2IOV2004 14.47-'A 03!04!200014'06—'! 07292004 10'.40 08/1012004 18:32- 111012004 12:50—'� Withn 75'of Intersecbon, (0)a=dents with inSufficient data tar displaV1 Straight c-.—== Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General o Pole Unknown Out of control ^ Injury .3 sigiml a Curb Backing Right turn 04 Fatality F Tree r :animal < - Overtaking ,4-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe CT--- U-turn DUI Extra data 72 1 .49/MEV Broad &.Higuera 9 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 --- - -- ...... -- . _.. ..............- .._. ................... _0410912004 18:§fy302004 16:14 ' 04/13/2004 12:47 04/24/2004 14:04 09/24/2004 13:50 rte_ 1221/2004 :40 .n r N v �� IaNa 1 i i n. o- ntersecton acct ents wi mke su en a or is a Strai .ght o Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects. Stopped a Erratic X Bicycle a General o Pole - Unknown anr.Out of control 0 Injury e; sipial a curb sR -.. Backing Q,, Right turn @ Fatality. Tree animal a-« Overtaking Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle ' _ a Sideswipe r-- U-tum :< DUI Extra data ' 73 1.14/MEV Monterey & Morro 3 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ............. OV1212004 14:45 of ?0Ta—=2Wnt—s%mff—insUffien-f-dita-ror-dRTagy-- Straight ===n Parked \ Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole Unknown Out of control C) Injury ® Signal o Curb sR .10 Backing Right turn GFatality tree Animal Overtaking v— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle <—. Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data 74 t 1 1 .05/MEV Calle Joaquin & Los Osos Valley 8 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 • ' �N 8 v N � i 12!201200441414:37 09/3012004 13F5 141_03/12l2004 16:38 i m of Inlersecton. aces enLS-Mth Insu dent dala tor display Straight o Parked / Pedestrian Fixed objects: ' <— Stopped Q... Erratic X Bicycle n General a Pole Unknown w,^ Out of control C; Injury is signal w curb a–» Backing Right turn Fatality Tree � Animal ' <- Overtaking .r— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a-a Sideswipe — U-turn DUI Extra data ' 75 1 .05/MEV 08 -0 & Pacific 6 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ............ .......... _ . \y fV i ti t _.12/0aQW417:12 09102/2004 18:34—'a 10/14/2004 13:40_ I . O7/0&2004 13:45_jy _.__......_._..0211912004 8:35 ' i 1 i Withn.75'af Intersection. accidents with ensu tctenr ata tar display —- Siraight ® Parked / Pedestrian Fixed objects. 1 a= Stopped a.- Erratic X Bicycle o General o Pole -: -- Unknown Out of,control O Injury s Si"g11al to curb a—» Backing Right turn Fatality is Trte Animal fi-« Overtaking X` Left turn -Nighttime 3rd vehicle a - Sideswipe U-tum DUI Extra data 76 appenb 4 Collector/ Collector Intersections t 1 1 1 1 77 Collector / Collector Intersection Prioritized by Accident Rate Rank.-_Prev.Rank _Intersection. Count._Volume_ Rate-Control __ EB WB NB SB 1 1 Chorro I- Mill 5 9,963 1.37 2-STOP 862 965 3,850 4,286 i 1 I 1 1 1 J 1 1 78 1 1 :37/MEV Chorro &-Mill - 5 Accidents- 01/01/04 = 12/34/04 T 1 VO&2W4 t422 1 - 1._..,;og4=004 23:15 m e N O 101 &2004 22:01—'� i i i i n o ntersecuon, accidents vAth ins uffictentdata for display — Straight Parked x Pedestrian Fixed objects: a---, Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General o Poly 1 <_ - Unknown air Out of control Injury a] signal W curb tf 'Tree 0 Animal a» Backing Right turn Fatality < - Overtaking ae— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a� Sideswipe U-turn :< DUI Extra data 79 dppeollX 5 Collector / Local Intersections 1 1 t 80 Collector/ Local Intersections prioritized by Accident Rate Rank Prev: Rank I 7-fnterie--Cel6n-- .-,TCollisions Volume I RateConfro!___ EB__ : WB _ __NB _ _ SB 1 -- -1.48- --- - --Ranked Cfioiro 8 Peaces ` 6 11,136 2-STOP 1 Not Ra1 500 1,500 3,850 4,286 - 2_ _Not Ranked Chorro& Murray- 3 12,530 0.66 4-STOP 2,172. 2,172_ .4,6493,537- 1 \ t 81 1 .48/MEV Chorro & Peach 6 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 t 06/0112004 16:39 10/07/2004 15:26 ' i 05126/2004 13:27-7v 05/0812004 17:25_ 03/07/2004 13:13 . ......-_......_0710912004 17.28 , I i i i i i m of Intersecfian. accidents Wth insufficient a_t_a_ for display Straight co Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a—: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle a Genesi a Poic -4-- . Unknown -z-v, Out of control r) Injury ai Signal W curb ' .. Backing o;,_ Right turn -�D Fatality Tree # Animal �-�.- Overtaking ,,e— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a-a Sideswipe ,�— U-turn DUI Extra data , 82 ' f 0.66 / MEV Chorro & Murray 3 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 -, ............................... 1 f 0&1912004 tz:sz 08J30/M 11:22 With i \ 1 1n 75'af Intersecton, accidents m1h ensu ictent a or dispLay Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a— Stopped e .� Erratic X Bicycle o General n Pole Unknown <np Out of control Injury m signal u curb I ® ?rte k Animal -v,,_a-» Backing Right turn Fatality �.+ Overtaking e— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe . U-turn DUI Extra data - ; 1 I83 I appenbm 6 Local ! Local Intersections I 1 I I 84 c O n M O O CO O CA N tOl to .. ' � QOLf) cfl. Q (1) � o Z.� ._ .— Z � r CV O etO � OOO � m to N fV CT CA R Co Zosco n aoo � 'NR CM . O O O O O m OI OI M O toO CO O O 7 to CO sf O M < O O 77 r N Z N ' m 0 O O0 OI O 'COO OCl OO lC)O 00 W O CO O to to O GC CO � r r r N 1 = 00000000 Q N N CV N M CV Q n fD.to r .• . W R N N N ibotrior oMom to CO N M N CO O . .O = Q. O O to O O N 0 O _ CV v V V [f V to Q) Ci0 O G U N V 1 L C ' Nfn cu 0 >1 m fa c m : m 1 o 0 m O � `� 6 P' ° °' a a J d m m ,a U a�S ca 6 1 caC. m >. m m M rn O y U — c mU0 0 o �j'g J m ' to v co Y CC c Y Y C C C IL o 0 0 0 z z z z Y r N M Q to CO Cl CO C m Q' 14.47/MEV Buena Vista & Garfield 4 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ................... 16_06105/2004 12:32 76-05130=04 1328 1,,-04102/2004 7:17 W'-02/03/2004 8:00 i. I --Wt-En-73 of Inteisedon. 10)accidents vath insufficient data or daolay I Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: <—. Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole < Unknown -x-v- Out of control Injury m Signal w Curb T- 0 ..%. Backing x,_ Right turn Fatality Tree Animal Overtaking ,e— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle .x— Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data Otea S�Lu.�0�sf�.CA Oar.'0!2005 lntmactw r.13me er 6,GW PC Prwa��1989,2000 86 2.68%-MEV ' Islay & Santa Rosa 4 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .._.......... 1 � n f , 1111712004 11:30-- 0 j i W,lh,n 11 ol Interseebon. acd8enE with insufficient data for clisplay- – Straight c.= Parked Pedesirian Fixed objects a-+ Stopped a:.. Erratic X Bicycle n General b Pole -- Unknown a-;r Out of control Injury, ?j signal w curb <- Backing 'k— Fight _Fatality Right turn tree Animal - � Overtaking Left turn Nightti.ine ol, 3rd vehicle a� Sideswipe U-turn - DUI Extra data 87 2.04 / MEV Casa & Murray 3 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 0 osrzirzo0'04 15:50 I 08/1 12:20 I i I i Within 75 oi Intersecton. accidents with insufficient ata for displaV I .9 Straight Parked \; Pedestrian Fixed objects: a = Stopped Erratic X Bicycle ❑ Genenl o Pole ---- Unknown air Out of control Injury M signal w Curb .4. Backing v�,_ Right turn Fatality s? Tree # Animal r.: Overtaking ,e— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a� Sideswipe F�7- U-turn -,, DUI Extra data I .. 0 , 88 1 .81 / MEV Osos & Peach 3 Accidents 01/01104 - 12/31/04 1. i02125=04 8:13 01/1512004 13:40---'A o C; VI Agt r Isplay Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle 0 General 0 Pole Unknown Out of control 0 Injury ® Signal m Curb Backing %A,_ Right turn r Fatality is Tree '.5 Animal <– . Overtaking xr— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle W .4-- Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data 89 1 .71 / MEV Broad & Monterey 3 Accidents _ 0.1/01/04 - 12/31/04 a r G� 02/2412004 23:40 .........................._.7 ". 02f0512004. 4:01 I m 75'of Intersecton. accidents vAth insufftment data for display-- . - Straight mzi=- Parked / Pedestrian Fixed objects a—; Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o rmwril o pole Unknown Out bfcontrol �� Injury sit+nal W ct;in ai Tice i� Animal a Backing � Right turn Co, Fatality <_ OvertaY—L king eft turn, Nighttiine 3rd vehicle W Sideswipe U-turn - DUI - Eztra data 90 1 appenoix Other Significant Intersections l �1 i91 m oo CD a o,oQm " r� ,n co o Z ao LO o %! Z C5,v Lf) v � i co Ci M M CM cb O m ch N n r O O Iq Ql C7 O O N C4 Of CO CO N CO) O-M Co to m (D CNO CN Co CO ¢ N ui PM j co co � Z C' N U U N C7 C� C7 C7 C7 C7 Q L oinnin �nv� in C mcmvao .ao ; CRcoCoU� LnLf) N X000000 m L- (6 E rn co n D co (D w �uli■ .L C O CD h OlRr O O .. ■ CDO N N In N cn Cc w 0 _ r cn O N O m co 0 c � L ,U U m ' C L m m C U +' > _ O m m c = N V Q' co M N S �J p O 11 (a 0 co . L(-) .m. ab O Z N -C ,Ont r pa m O m U C �m N L1J m 0 Y a 'O 'O 'C 'O Cd N m m Ol R Y Y Y Y Y m m m m m f0 f0 l0 f0 f0 cij CL,` zz° z° z° z -. � � N C7 lqr Lo O ■ .84 / 1VMEV Descanso & Los Osos Valley 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 i .............. ......... Wig r ,y Tin 75 of Intersegfion.,Q)accidents with insufficient data for disolav Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a—+ Stopped Erratic Bicycle o Geneml o Pok �j - - Unknown. .ter Out of control Injury m s'g"'l a curb . T`` A""ntBacking x— Ri hituin Fatality _ <- Overtaking V-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-ttun. DUI Extra data 93 .66 / MEV Chorro & Foothill 6 Accidents. 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 - - - - o3roSOON 16:40 oud4�:as 06/23/2004 16:43' 0611112004.21:04' 1 =Y—A _.........................03/3112004 12:50 Within 75'of Intersecton, accident s with insufficient data,for isp ay_- N Straight , iv Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects Ill a-i Stopped Erratic ,X Bicycle o Genera a Pole -- Unknown a-,r Out of control Injury 11 s;g�al % curb m Trae " : tlnilnal a—» Backing Right tum Fatality �«.Overtaking a� Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle <� Sideswipe U4uffi DUI Extra data ., G1\ 4 '94 I. .64 / MEV Foothill & Santa Rosa 14 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .............................. 1011112004 8:50 06112t2DD4 18:10 07115r2004 11:00"f- 12/24Q004 12:00�-, 47CV ...............................- WiNn 'of IntWersecton, accidents with Ru-fffic—tent dala For dmplav Straight =-n Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle c General 13 POIC ---- Unknown Out of control C) Injury ig Signal Curb Animal Backing Right turn 11F, Fatality Overtaking kl— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle -r— Sideswipe U-turn < DUI Extra data 95 .58 / MEV Madonna & Oceanaire 5 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ............ ................... 01122rM 22.44 Xg-1012212004 11:00 W I 0510612004 8.47_'� ■ ................. ...... 08118=04 15:47 ............ ......... .............. ..................... Within 5'oftntersedon. 101-acct-cWnts—wiffi-i-ns—uYic-ient data for displaV Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle 0 General 0 POIC Unknown <,,.r Out of control Injury m Signal m Curb I <– Backing Right turn Fatality W. Tree Animal <- Overtaking Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle .c— Sideswipe U-turn r< DUI Extra data 96 r 1,58 / MEV High/Pismo &H guera 4-Accidents 01/01/04 = 12/31/04 oar3on 10:50 C-4 m I __. . . ....._.. i n o ntersecUon accidents with insufficient data for drmbv .9 Straight o Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a� Stopped r.-. Erratic X Bicycle o General o poll ;- Unknown a-,r Out-of control C` Injury 0 signal a curb I FN Tree Animal a—.. Backing �`_Aight turn_ „ Fatality ' Overtaking Left turn Nightt n e 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-turn. DUI Extra data f 97 X55 / MEV El Mercado & Madonna 7 Accidents 01/01/04 = 12/31/04 0927/2004 13:15 01/04120041:17 01212004 16:00 062312004 23:0.6 WDV2o04.20:46'-11� 10/042004 16:47—'! AAte_ ..._.................................. ...__. C' ,__......�:..:._._.........,.._.-. Flo _ Within 7$ o ntersecton, accidents vn msuf icient data or isp v -_- – Straight =-----Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a— Stopped -...;Erratic X Bicycle o General o role .. -- Unknown a-vp Out of control ;; Injury ® signal a Curb a—» Backing Fatalm Tme Animal Right-turn (' ity 4«• Overtaking Left turn. Nightti hid 3ril vehicle Sideswipe U-turn < DUI Extra data I • 1 98 LO � co N Lr) Lo - z M t, n (D [O .b+ �Q m Q a r m �r W Z Ln � W L T -0. O U U Q O wOOaO _ O fn to to U r N NC,4 cm Lo . LCO O O O - L a C 7 O LO O L6 Ld O .0 iU > rn M co c CA C cn O —N LO O I� � � O O U C M Q.- M. om O � .t _R • U C N C - N Lb 0) a O R m R Y .0 C13 C � O C � R C > It CD O CL z Y tC0 � N M I .72 / MEV Higuera & Vachell 5 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .......... ........ 101132004 2/31/04 101132004 14:30 02262004 8:50 d� 10/132004 12:07 02/182004 18:50`121312004 17:35 With4 n 75'of Intersec6on, accidents with insufficient data tor ChSplay <— Straight Q Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: �- Stopped a,.. Erratic X Bicycle o Generai a Poie - Unknown <-,j, Out of control Injury ra Signal w Curb a-» Backing Right tum ^ Fatality E Trac K Animal �« Overtaking Ae-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle .>� Sideswipe U-him DU] Extra data 100 .69 / MEV Montal_ban & Santa Rosa f 9 Accidents 01/0 1/04 "12/31/04 _.. ....._.......... _ .. .. . CH ------ l� I� �� ,,ISerzar _ 0u11 MAN 1526 �I N W `' _......_.._....................................... 70 _ ...__...................... ................ n o.nlersecUon _ .acpdentswiinsufficient data for disolav a Straight cz=Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: <— Stopped • Q Erratic X Bicycle a General o pole ---- Unknown a-tir Out of control Injury ej Signal w curb is Trec 91 Animal �-» Backing Right turn Fatality �+ Overtaking ,Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe rL U-turn :< DUI Eztra data M 55 / MEV Meinecke & Santa Rosa 7 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 i- mm 0 0 i � o o m � p O - _.. ..i '..-....._............................. rc n 'of Interseeficn, aco encs with insufficient t data for disp av a— Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: a—. Stopped Erratic X Bicycle ❑ General a Polc -t---- Unknown Out of control Injury ® signal a curb a-.. Backing t� Right turn qr; Fatalit gree Animal Y < - Overtaking Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle -:� Sideswipe U-turn c DUI Extra data 102 1 r dppEnom 8 Arterial Segments r r r r t r r r I03 Arterial Segments Prioritized by Accident Rate Rank Prev.Rank Segment Collisions Volume Se .Len.- - Rate 1 Not Ranked MARSH 200 ELK 3 13305 0.02 36.24 3 7 HIGUERA 700 BLK 6 9650 0.12 _14.74 4 Not Ranked HIGUERA 800 BLK _ _____ __ _ _ _ 3_ _ 8826_ 0.09 10.93 5 Not Ranked BROAD 1500 BLK 3 .11645 0.07 10.65 6 Not Ranked MARSH 1300-1400 BLK 3 4108 0.19 10.56 7 3 HIGUERA 4000 BLK 4 6737- 0.16_ 10.35 _8 _ _12 TANKFARM.700 BLK = _ 6 1.1057 0.16 9.23 9 .6 MARSH 800 BLK. 3. 12939 0.09 7.45 . 10 Not Ranked CALIFORNIA 800 BLK 3 16683 0.07 7.13 2 Not Ranked. DALIDIO 1600.2000 BLK 2 3000 __ 0.28 6.52 11 Not Ranked ORCUTT 800 BLK 4. 15406 0.11 6.26 12 Not Ranked JOHNSON 1400 BLK 3 21091 0.06 6.05 13 18 LOS OSOS VALLEY 12200-12400 BLK 12 19106 0.30 5.64 14 Not Ranked CALIFORNIA 500 BLK. 4 25184 0.09_ 4.94 15 Not Ranked HIGUERA 3000-3100 BLK 4 15104_ _ _" 0.16 4.62 16 13 FOOTHILL 300 BLK 3 _ 13710 . 0.13 _ 4.59 17 22 -JOHNSON 2800.3000 BLK _ 5 14510 0.22 4.33 18 Not Ranked FOOTHILL 700 BLK 5 19095 0.17 423 19_ .Not Ranked MONTEREY 1800-1900 BLK 3 8481 0.23 4.19 20 8 FOOTHILL 1100 BLK 3- ". 19233 0.12_ 3.53 21 11 CALIFORNIA 200-400 BLK 8 25184 0.25 3.43 22 Not Ranked JOHNSON 1500 BLK _ __ _ _ 3 21091 0.12 3.32 23 17 SANTA BARBARA 2000-2100 BLK 3 14678 0.17 1 3.30 24 Not Ranked JOHNSON 1600-1700 BLK 3 20048 0.13 3.26 25 24 MADONNA 400-100 BLK_. _ _ 11 31454 0.32 3.03 26 4 BROAD 3000 BLK 3 30000 0.09 . 3.01 27 .Not Ranked HIGUERA 3800 BLK 3 15201_ _ 0.19 . 2.91 28 5 HIGUERA 200 3 15987 0.18 2.80 29 _21.. -MONTEREY-1.600-1700 BLK 3 20905 0.15 2.66 30 15_. FOOTHILL 800-900 BLK. 5. 29760 0.17__ _2.64 31 26 HIGUERA 10 BLK 4 15104 0.31 2.38 32 Not Ranked SAN LUIS DR 1400-1500 BLK 3 11431 -0.32, 2.23 33 16 LOS OSOS VALLEY 11400-11500 BLK 3 . . 23855 0.17 2.02 34 25 LOS OSOS VALLEY 11600-11800 BLK 3 19751 0.23 1.83 35 29 BROAD 3200-3400 BLK _ 3 25500 0.20 1.58 36 Not Ranked MADONNA 1300-1100 BLK 4. 17198 0.42 1.53" 37 Not Ranked LOS OSOS VALLEY 11900-12100 BLK 3 19751., 0.34. . 1.22 38 _Not Ranked SANTA ROSA 100-300 BLK 17 33500 3.15 0.44 39 - 31 BROAD 2200 BLK 3 30000 0.79 0.35 40 Not Ranked N.SANTA ROSA 100-300BLK 14 35000.. " 4.15 0.26 41 Not Ranked LOS OSOS VALLEY 12500 BLK 3 17636 2.15 0.22 42 Not Ranked SANTA ROSA 10 BLK 7 33500 5.15 0.11 104' 36.24 / MVM MARSH 200 BLK 3 Accidents (rate:0.68) 01/0'1/04 - 12/31/04 0&t 712 d9 17. 12/142009 19:10 07n52oo417:30 ._..............................: (clear ter acct_encs wi insufficient data ordisplay - Straight Parked — X Pedestrian Fixed objects; Q—e Stopped c Erratic X Bicycle a croerai o Polo Unknown a-,r Out of control Injury w Sipa-1 c6it Backing v,-_ Right turn % Fatality ® Tree Animal Overtaking e— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data ------- ------ - - --------- - --- --- - .105 d S t0. -106 r r r 14.74 / MVM HIGUERA 700 BLK 6 .Accidents_ rate:0.28 - 01/0.1/04 -' 12/31/04 r ..... .... - _ _ 12JI212004 3:30 01/03/2004 1:50 62/11/2004 12 0312012004 13:30 0]26(2004 23:14 10128/2004 1 S . —- -(clear iter accidents withinsufficient data or iso ay Straight = Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: <---4 Stopped <t , Erratic Bicycle o Ganaral to Poi ,<- - Unknown an.r Out of control ` .Injury . ® signal u curb gi a—�• Backing % . Right turn Fatality i rce k Animal a«. Overtaking_ Left turn > Nighttime 3rd vehicle a SideswiPe U=turn ti; DUI Extra data 107 Q tilCG E'�py i J o� �r 108 1 -10.93 / MVM HIGUERA 800 BLK 3 Accidents (rate:0.21) 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .......... 0610612004 13:15 09/1212004 13:38 V—�n 1211=004 15:30 (clear filter), (0)accidents ent insufficient data for displaV 4 Straight o Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: � Stopped t, Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole Unknown <-.p Out of control Injury ® Signal ia Curb <–» Backing Right turn Fatality i; Trac Animal .4«. Overtaking or— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle -r-- Sideswipe U-turn <. DUI Extra data . . ......... • 109 I .- - � 1 �� �� �� 1 y I GG£'F'9 �� O ,� ��. . .1:10 10.65 / MVM ~ T BROAD 1500 BLK 3 Accidents rate-,0.20) O 1/O 10 - 12/31/04 A$ , P :..e r - r i -_........ ...... r c ear. ter, acct ants%fith qrsufficient data for display -- Straight ©Parked J Pedestrian Fixed objects! * Stopped -.r, Erratic X Bicycle o cett6ra-1 o role Unknown a,r Out of control 'J Injury m signal s Curb c—» �� m Ticc Animal BBCkin g Right tum Fatality �-�- Overtaking e— Left turn_ Nighttime, 3rd vehicle <r— Sideswipe 5j;�-- U-turn. ; DUI Extra data 1 i Bueh_on - � r z �s 0 D d i I a ISLAM 112 t 10.56 % MV1VI 1VIARSH 1300-1400 blk 3 Accidents rate:0.20 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 ........................... ...... 04ro11M25.00 f 061102004 11:55 11/172004 -i 2:45-., \. ........ .................._...... . . ........ .____....._...,...i --- c ear filter), a=i ents with insuffident daFa for isp ay. a- Straight t Parked X Pedestrian Fixed objects e—. Stopped <-, Erratic Bicycle o General o PWe ,t--- Unknown ai%P Out of control Injury ® Signal § Ani mTree § Animal a–» Backing Right turn .Fatality ate• Overtaking ,a Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle a Sideswipe. U-turn DUI Extra data 113 c O,pNl� AAAA F,p NsO� . 114 77, Appenanc9 Collector Segments 115 1 Collector Segments Prioritized by Accident Rate Seg. Rank___ Pre"v: Rank Se merit FCollisions Volume . Len._ . - Rate- 1 Not Ranked OCEANAIRE 1300-1500 BLK 3 837 0.52 18.74 2 Not Ranked- PALM 1000 BLK 3 6000 0.09 14.47 3 Not Ranked PISMO 1000 BLK 3 7322 0.09 11.85 4 Not Ranked HIGH 100-300 BLK 3 2744 0.44 5 Not Ranked RAMONA_400-600BLK__-_- 3 6225 0.26 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 116 A-8-341-MVM --OCEANAIRE 1300-1500 BLK 3_Accidents (rate0.42 0.1/0.1/04-j 2/31/04 . o 0 _ '•� 1 .............__...-----.__..._.__\ ..........._....... ......._.._......._.. 1 ............................. (clearfilter). . a=idents vAth insuffictent data for is a - - Straight ® Parked X Pedestrian Fixed objects: a--i Stopped Erratic X Bicycle o General a Pole Unknown Out of control ` Injury a S par w curb is a–» Backing o,_ Right turn. Fatality Tret ¢, Animal Overtaking Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle �., Sideswipe q:— U=turn <; DUI Extra ata - ra I - 117 P���, P� ��,1 OC,_ �.P���� F9�9 ./� $` P� PS�P��RO ... _ i . ��8 � r 14:47 / MVM PALM 1000 BLK r 3 Accidents 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 r r042&2004 0� 09292004 1090 r _ r r 04252004...11:07---. r r ....... I ear filterI accidents wiinsufficient data for display — ---7777 Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic x Bicycle n denwal o pole Unknown <-,r Out of control C Injury m signal 2 curb a=» BackingRight tum ® Tree Animal g ;, Fatality �_. Overtaking. ,e— Left tum Nighttime 3rd vehicle a a Sideswipe U-turn f DOI Extra data r119 Sq ' �T 9 � O� t 9 t QP t 1 1 . 1 11 :85_/ MVM `PISMO 10. 00_BLK 1 3 Accidents (rate:0.22- )_ 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 1 10130/2004 72:11 0211912004 1135 Cc— oati 50004 1033 I - 1 (clear i ter accidents Ynth irtsuthment date for ciwlay Q— Straight =�3 Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: ^s--- Stopped � Erratic X Bicycle ❑ General o rope Unknown s Out of control O Injury ® sipal 2 crab .: Backing sem. Right turn - `, Fatality ® T12 Animal .:-•a- Overtaking Left tum Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe 57 U-tuin DUI Extra data 1 121 - - -- _. ! 5 �� O Af f�O SP __ �Q . �P " �Q? . 122 6.83 / MVM HIGH 100-300 BLK 3 Accidents (rate:0. 13) 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 101212004 SA5 06/0212004 14:30 05107r2= 6:50 fc-lear biter). (U)acctenvAth insufficient data for display Straight Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: Stopped Erratic X Bicycle n General a Pole Unknown r Out of control (.) Injury a; Signal w Curb Backing Right turn g, Fatality Ee Tree § Animal ' �. Overtaking v— Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data MIMMMMARTM�- W.00,30MM"MIMM.T.T.M 123 V RP �NISM� v tir�y Q G G FF 12 4 5.01 / MVM RAMONA 400-600 BLK 3 Accidents (rate:0.09) 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .............. 06/021m 19:05 05/0412004 20:50 I .... .. .................. 05/152004 16:25 ...............................................: r - (clear filter), accidents unth insufficient data.or display Straight . Parked / Pedestrian . Fixed objects. �t— Stopped -x. Erratic X Bicycle o General o Pole -- Unknown am Out of control Injury m Signal w Curb Backing Right turn Ccs Fatality Trot Animal . ' -ir Overtaking or-- Left turn Nighttime 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-turn DUI Extra data 125 PSP �PSSP' t 9 Q 126 l I ILocal Segments I 1 , I - I I i 1 1 1 1 I127 Local Segments Prioritized by Accident Rate Rank Prev. Rank Class _ Segment _ -Col fis'ions__Volume_ Se Len -__ Rate 1 1 _ L_ _ - CASA 10400 6LK 3 3963 0:25 8.30 i . 1 1 128 1 8.30/ MVM CASA 10-200 BLK 3 Accidents rate:0.16 01/01/04 - 12/31/04 .......... f - f .................. CR f ... _............ ..-- - — c ear filter). accidents with ensu icient data fordisplay .e Straight © Parked Pedestrian Fixed objects: -<-MM-4 Stopped a Erratic X Bicycle ❑ General c POIc -� - Unknown <,vp Out of control Injury ® sigml B Curb a-» Backing Right turn �� f atalit "' Tree . nni�iiat Y a Overtaking ee-- Left turn > Nighttime 3rd vehicle . a— Sideswipe U-turn < DUI Extra data 129 i i F - f pESER�T a H appenom n 2004 Police Department Traffic Safety Unit Operations Report i 131 . 1 city of san lues owspo Safety 2004 Traffic Police department 1042 Walnut Street ,- Unit Report. San Luis Obispo CA 93401 "Service,Pride.Integrity" 2004 SUMMARY The San Luis Obispo Police Department Traffic Safety Unit had another busy year. During 2004 officers from the Traffic Unit were assigned to supplement the Patrol Division due to personnel shortages. The staffing of the Traffic Unit was reduced from four officers to three upon Officer Owen's retirement in October. Manpower shortages in the department resulted in less time for enforcement activities by patrol officers and traffic officers. The traffic officers who were assigned to the Traffic Unit were extremely busy investigating collisions and dandling special events such as the.Christmas Parade, the Bicycle Rodeo, etc. There were four fatal traffic collisions in 2004. The number of collisions increased slightly from 1,230 in 2003 to 1,310 in 2004, representing a 6.5% increase. Pedestrian collisions increased from 29 in 2003 to 34 in 2004, representing a 11.2% increase. Bicycle collisions decreased significantly from 53 in 2003 to 41 in 2004, representing a 22.6% reduction. Traffic Unit Personnel The following personnel were assigned to the Traffic Unit: r Sergeant Hubbard supervised the Traffic Unit. Officer Owen was certified in child safety seat inspections and was a certified collision reconstructionist..He was certified in basic, intermediate, and advanced collision investigation. He was assigned to the Traffic Unit until his retirement in October 2004. Officer Kevany is certified in basic, intermediate, and advanced collision investigation and is a certified collision reconstructionist with a specialty in occupant kinematics. Additionally, she is a certified police motorcycle trainer. Officer Booth is certified in basic, intermediate, and advanced collision investigation. Additionally, he is a certified police motorcycle trainer. 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report ' Page 2 of 7 September 27, 2005 ' Officer Gallo is certified in basic, intermediate, and advanced collision investigation.. Additionally, he is certified in child safety seat inspections and is a certified RADAR/LIDAR instructor. f PROGRAMS San Luis Obispo Traffic Committee City Traffic Engineering and the Police Department Traffic Safety Unit continued to work together on traffic-related issues. The two groups met on a quarterly basis to discuss and resolve collision and enforcement related issues. In 2004 a new procedure was enacted,wherein Traffic Engineering is contacted after major injury and fatal collisions. Members of Traffic Engineering meet with members of the Traffic Safety Unit at the collision scene to discuss the specifics of the collision. In this way, the members of the Traffic Safety Unit benefit from the opinions and expertise of the members of Traffic Engineering and the members of Traffic Engineering benefit from the opinions and expertise of members of the Traffic Safety Unit. DUI Enforcement The number of DUI arrests for 2004 was 25.4% less than in 2003. The number of DUI- related collisions for 2004 was 31.3% more than in 2003. Officer Booth continues to be the department's representative at monthly DUI Task Force meetings. Officer Kevany participated in an educational presentation during the Cal Poly Week of Welcome regarding the dangers of driving under the influence. The Traffic Unit coordinated one DUI checkpoint with the California Highway Patrol,the 1 Cal Poly State University Police Department, and the Cuesta Colle9e Police Department. During the checkpoint, 434 drivers were screened, 10 drivers were . arrested for DUI, and four drivers were cited for being unlicensed or for having suspended licenses. All the drivers who had drivers' license.problems had their cars towed and impounded for 30 days. ' Vehicle Impound Program Enforcement of vehicle laws related to individuals who drive cars while their licenses are ' suspended continues to be a strong focus of the Traffic Safety Unit and the entire Patrol Division. In 2004, officers impounded 137 vehicles for 30 days from drivers who had suspended licenses or were never licensed. f 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report Page 3of7 September 27, 2005 Bicycle Safety Rodeo For the seventh year in a row, the San.Luis Obispo Police Department and the Parks and Recreation Department conducted a very successful bicycle rodeo. The event was held at the Madonna Plaza and approximately 200 youths participated in the event approximately 50 more than the previous year. Each participant received a lunch, a tee shirt, and a prize.bag containing bicycle safety-related items. Each participant's helmet and bicycle were inspected by technicians from local bicycle shops. As.needed, technicians completed minor repairs on bicycles and flagged damaged or defective helmets for replacement. New bicycle helmets were given to underprivileged children and children with damaged or defective helmets. As part of the bicycle safety program, a professional bicycle stunt group performed at the bicycle rodeo, at four schools, and during the Thursday.night Farmer's Market. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) "55 Alive" Sergeant Hubbard addressed groups of seniors attending AARP-sponsored classes on four occasions. Issues relating to traffic safety and safe driving were.covered. Special Events Officers from the Traffic Unit assisted in the following city-sponsored events: • Mardi Gras • MS Walk and Run • SLO Triathlon • Wheels of SLO City to Sea Marathon. • Cal Poly Homecoming Parade • San Luis High School Homecoming Parade • SLO Holiday Parade Officers from the Traffic Unit assisted the following agencies with special_events: • The Elk_ s Parade, Santa Maria . • Fourth of July events in Pismo Beach and Cayucos ' Car show in Paso Robles Traffic Index The traffic index--the ratio of hazardous citations issued divided by the number of injury and fatal collisionsis a gauge of how effective a traffic safety program is. The Office of Traffic Safety considers an enforcement index of'25 to be the minimum effective rate: In cities where there is high tourism, the rate is expected to be between 25-35, as 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report Page 4 of 7 September 27, 2005 tourists are not aware of traffic issues and I problern areas and are therefore more likely to commit violations.. The current index for,the City of San Luis Obispo is 5.2. The index is determined* by dividingthe 1,708 hazardous citations by 325 injury and four fatal collisions. During 2004 the Traffic Unit and Patrol Division traffic enforcement wer6'hampered by the manpower shortage that was created by a budget shortfall and by several employees retiring during the year. In order to meet staffing and workload requirements, traffic officers were assigned to Patrol. This resulted in a higher workload for the remaining traffic officers and less time was, available for enf.orcetnerit,efforts--not .ohly for traffic officers but also for Oatrol officers. TRAFFIC SAFETY UNIT COMPLETED GOALS FOR 2004 Officer Booth was certified as a Motorcycle Training Officer. Officer-Gal lo Was certified in intermediate and advanced traffic collision invettigation TRAFFIC- SAFETY UNIT GOALS FOR 2005 . • Have an additional officer certified as a collision reconstructionist. • Once Patrol and Traffic are fully staffed,.take the lead to improve the traffic index to above 20. • Finish the major injury/fatal collision call-out protocol and policy. . 2004 STATISTICS COLLISIONS Collision Type 1048 -1999 1006. .-2001L.. 2002 - 2.003 -2004 CHANGE Fatal 1 2 2 1 1 0 *4 400% Injury 192 195 280 278 327 327 **325 -0.6% Non-Injury 981 990 925 981 1060 903 ***980 8.5% Total 1174 1187 1207 1260 1388 1230 1310 6.5% Bicycle Involved 43 36 36 42 54 53 41 -22.6% Pedestrian Involved 18 '28 29 25 43 29 ****34 17.2% Hit and Run 140 *****368 162.9% 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report Page 5of7 ' September 27, 2005 * 1 fatal collision involved a pedestrian. ** 12 injury collisions occurred on private property. *** 103 non-injury collisions occurred on private property. **** 3 pedestrian collisions occurred on private property. ' ***** 286 hit and run collisions occurred on public roadways, of which 9 resulted in minor injuries. 82 hit and run collisions were on private property, none of which resulted in any injuries. TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT Citation Type 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 CHANGE Non Hazardous 2335 2635 2335 2049 2051 2603 1308 -49.8% Hazardous 3153 3480 4526 5191 4837 2414 1708 -29.2% Total 7083 5478 6115 6861 7240 5017 3016 -39.9% DUI ENFORCEMENT ' DUI Enforcement 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 CHANGE t DUI Arrests 393 450 487 392 493 405 302 -25.4% SLOCOPS 56 43 68 33 N/A N/A N/A N/A DUI Collisions 38 31 47 49 53 48 63 31.3% COST RECOVERY DUI Cost Recovery Billed Received % Recovered 2004 $26,784 $6,897* 26% 2003 $18,986 $8,185 43% 2002 $21,332 $10,000 47% 2001 $18,761 $5,667 30% ' 2000 $17,374 $5,640 32% 1999 $7,448 $3,226 43% 1998 $12,295 $4,751 39% ' * $19,887 was sent to collections. On average, the collection agency collects 47% of the amount that is sent to them. ' 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report Page 6 of 7 September 27, 2005 TOP COLLISION INTERSECTIONS 2004 Rank Location Number of Collisions ' 1 Marsh at Santa Rosa 17 2 Monterey at Santa Rosa 15 3 Foothill at Santa Rosa 14 ' 4 Chorro at Palm 13 6 California at Monterey 12 ' 5 Murray at Santa Rosa 12 6 Broad at Higuera 9 6 Broad at Orcutt 9 ' 6 Chorro at Pismo 9 6 Higuera at Santa Rosa 9 6 Montalban at Santa Rosa 9 TOP COLLISION INTERSECTIONS 2003 ' Rank Location Number of Collisions 1 Broad at Marsh 11 ' 1 Madonna at Pereira 11 2 Broad at Orcutt 10 2 Foothill at Santa Rosa 10 2 Monterey at Santa Rosa 10 3 Higuera at Santa Rosa 9 4 Higuera at South 8 ' 4 Laurel at Orcutt 8 4 Los Osos Valley at Madonna 8 4 Marsh at Santa Rosa 8 ' CAUSE OF INJURY COLLISIONS 2004 ' Number of Collisions Cause % of Total 117 Failure to Yield 35.6% 52 Unsafe Speed 15.8% ' 23 Stop Sign / Signal Light 7% 22 Improper Turning 6.7% 21 Other Improper Driving 6.4% I 19 DUI 5.8% 15 Unknown 4.6% 14 Following Too Closely 4.3% ' 10 Unsafe Starting 3% 7 Wrong side of the road 2.1% i 2004 Traffic Safety Division Annual Report Page 7of7 September 27, 2005 . CAUSE OF INJURY COLLISIONS 2003 Number of Collisions Cause % of Total' 115 Failure to yield 41.3% 65 Unsafe Speed 23.3% 22 Improper Turning 7.9% 17 DUI 6.1% 15 Other Improper Driving 5.3% 13 Wrong side of the road 4.6% I 9 Pedestrian Right-of-way 3.2% 8 Unsafe.Lane Change 2.8% 7 Following Too Closely 2.5% 7 Unsafe Backing 2.5% - I i 1