HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/07/2006, C3 - REQUEST FOR ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO FILE THE FINAL MAP FOR THE MOTEL INN CONDOMINIUM (2223 MONTE council
j acEnaa Repoat '�Kumb 3
CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O
FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Direct
By: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner pp,
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO FILE THE FINAL MAP FOR THE
MOTEL INN CONDOMINIUM (2223 MONTEREY STREET, CITY FILE#TR 122-01).
CAO RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt attached Resolution "A" approving the requested one year time extension for filing the
final map for Tract Map No. 2500; City File No. TR 122-01, subject to all the findings and
conditions of tentative map approval.
DISCUSSION
Situation
On February 4, 2003, the City Council approved the tentative map creating a 48-unit airspace
condominium. Tentative map approval is good for two years. A final map must be filed before
the expiration date or the tentative map approval becomes null and void, unless an extension of
time is requested and granted.
On December 8, 2005, prior to the map expiration date of February 4, 2006, the City received the
time extension request. Under Section 16.16.180 of the City's subdivision regulations, the City
may grant time extensions for filing final maps totaling no more than three years. This is the
applicant's second requested time extension. With approval of the time extension, the map will
remain valid until February 4, 2007.
Data Summary
Address: 2223 Monterey Street
Subdivider: John King
Zoning: C-T-S, Tourist-Commercial with the Special Consideration overlay zone
General Plan: Tourist Commercial
Environmental Status: The City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
project on February 4, 2001.
Site Description
The project site is located on the very northeast end of Monterey Street, and is adjacent to the
Highway 101 on its north side. The site backs up to San Luis Obispo Creek on its south side and
the single-family neighborhood along San Luis Drive. Other motel projects surround the site to
Cj -/
Tract 2500(TR 122-01)Time Extension(2223 Monterey Street) Page 2
the north and west.
Conclusion
It has been the City's policy to support time extensions if the subdivider has made reasonable
progress toward fulfilling tract conditions, or if there are extenuating circumstances that have
delayed the filing of the final map. In this case, the subdivider indicates that he is attempting to
address the many conditions of project approval. Since progress has been made toward
advancing project plans, there do not appear to be issues with the City Council granting the one-
year time extension for filing the final map.
CONCURRENCES
The approved conditions of approval reflect the requirements of all reviewing City departments.
No additions or changes to conditions of approval are recommended.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Deny the requested one-year time extension.
If the council denies the time extension, the tentative tract map becomes null and void.
NOTE. The City Council may approve or deny the request for an extension of
time. However, the City Council may not change, delete or add conditions
of approval (El Patio v. Permanent Rent Control Board of the City of
Santa Monica, Court of Appeals, 2nd District Division 1, October 6,
1980).
2. Continue consideration of the request with direction on information needed to render a
decision.
Attached:
Attachment 1: Vicinity map
Attachment 2: Reduced size copy of Tentative Tract Map No. 2500
Attachment 3: City Council Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)—containing tract map conditions
of approval
Attachment 4: Time extension request dated 12-8-05
Attachment 5: Resolution "A" approving time extension
Attachment 6: Resolution "B" denying time extension
Subdv\TR 122-01(ti=exwmiou).
G .3 -2
� s •
■moi ■®i■ � ►,
■ INN •
�
h'',��tss+I'n`�� Y�;�i��l'rbr�i h`�4"a�el*��2 ,}���"1..�• y 'i��'•' r� �
Al
TrAWN I
F!�• �n3�y�$�� bf�11fiM1 >�
w`
s
1 ♦ �►
VICINITY MAP ARC & A 122-01
2223 MONTEREY.
ent 2
ZL
Y
.•
Z
Zf 5 6
I miI
Ila
$�
ui
it
7-01
� \ =Yt A.idd KCi
}
f i �
•Tr i ��
Ste:
i i 1
i
I AHa
T !
LO
es y
Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO.9420 (2003 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
TO ESTABLISH A 48-UNIT AIR-SPACE CONDOMINIUM
AT 2223 MONTEREY STREET
(APPLICATIONS NO.TR 8 ER 122-01)
WHEREAS, public hearings on this project regarding the use permit and environmental
review were held before the Planning Commission on January 8, 2003, and the City Council on
February 4, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration was considered by the City Council after
extensive review by City staff and other agencies, and with the comments of the Planning
Commission and concerned public; and
WHEREAS, the potential environmental impacts of the project have been evaluated in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental
Guidelines.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE rr RESOLVED by the City Council as follows:
SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council hereby adopts the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Motel Inn Redevelopment Project finding that it adequately
identifies the project's potentially significant impacts with the inclusion of the following mitigation
measures and monitoring program:
Mitigation Measure 1:
The Architectural Review Commission shall carefully evaluate project building colors and
details of the Apple Farm building to insure that the project's massing appears in context with
existing vegetation and the hills beyond when viewed from the highway corridor.
Monitoring Pro rgr
The Architectural Review Commission shall monitor compliance with this requirement through
the review of detailed plans. Community Development Department staff will then verify
compliance with their review of working drawings for a building permit and subsequent
inspections.
R9420
�a3 —s
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series) Attachment 3
Page 2
Mitigation Measure 2:
All exterior lighting shall be shielded down-lights that do not shine skyward or spill onto
adjacent properties to the review and approval of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC).
Lighting Between the buildings and the creek shall be limited in intensity and scale necessary'for .
security and identification. Plans submitted for final review by the ARC shall include details of
wall-mounted light fixtures with illumination levels and shielding mechanisms. This shall
include decorative wall lights, as well as service area wall pack lights. If proposed, details of any
pole or bollard lights shall also be included in plans reviewed by the ARC. New lighting
standards shall not exceed 20 feet in height, from the approved finished grade to the top of the
fixture. Illumination levels at the finished grade below the lighting fixtures shall not exceed 10
footcandles under the fixture and 3 footcandles at the dimmest point, which shall be confirmed
with photometric plans submitted with working drawings.
Monitoring Program:
The Architectural Review Commission shall monitor compliance with this requirement through
the review of detailed plans. Community Development Department staff will then verify
compliance with their review of working drawings for a building permit and subsequent
inspections.
Mitigation Measure 3:
The following mitigation measures shall constitute a dust mitigation plan which shall become a
part of working drawings and be in effect during project construction:
a. The amount of disturbed area shall be reduced where possible.
b. The permanent dust control measures identified in the approved revegetation and
landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any
soil disturbing activities.
c. Water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent airborne dust from.leveling the
site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed
15mph. Reclaimed(non-potable)water should be use whenever possible.
d. Exposed ground areas, .which are to be reworked at dates greater than one month after
initial ,grading, should be sown with a fast-germinating native grass seed and watered
until vegetation is established.
e. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as
possible. In addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading
unless seeding or soil binders are used
f. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15mph on any unpaved
surface at the construction site.
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420(2003 Series)
Page 3
Monitoring Program:
Community Development Department staff shall monitor compliance with this requirement by
insuring that the dust mitigation plan becomes a part of working drawings. The Building
Inspector and Public Works Inspectors shall conduct field monitoring.
Mitigation Measure 4:
The project will implement an aggressive parking demand reduction and management program.
This program will include designation of a Transportation Coordinator who will manage
transportation programs for the project and shall promote alternative modes of transportation. The
program will provide for preferential carpool/vanpool parking, continued shuttle service, and
discount transit. The project applicant will be required to submit an implementation plan to the
City Transportation Division,for review and approval or amendment, which demonstrates how this
mitigation measure will be achieved.
Monitoring Program:
City Transportation Division staff will be the lead in reviewing the parking demand reduction and
management program with the assistance of the Community Development Department. The
provisions of the plan will need to be in place prior to occupancy and will require on-going
implementation.
Mitigation Measure 5:
The applicant shall contact the Air Pollution Control District prior to submitting a building
permit application for the project and shall comply with all requirements of the Asbestos ATCM,
to the approval of APCD and the Community Development Director.
Monitoring Program:
The applicant shall coordinate with APCD prior to building permit issuance to meet
requirements. Community Development shall monitor by insuring that the requirement has been
met prior to signing off on working drawings.
N M
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (200. 3 Series)
Page 4
Mitigation Measure 6:
The applicant shall have a United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocol survey for
the potential presence of the Califomia red-legged frog conducted prior to the onset of project
construction. The results of this survey shall be submitted to the City of San Luis Obispo
Community Development Director for review and a determination of need for further action. If
frogs were found in the creek area, then appropriate protective facilities'would .need to be
installed. If frogs were found on the work site, then City staff will consult with the USFWS.
If construction activities are scheduled to begin between March In and August 30`h, then the
applicant shall hire a qualified biological consultant to conduct a follow-up inspection of the site
to determine the status of the potential red-shouldered hawk nest and to identify any nesting
birds in the area. If the nest is active, it may be necessary to reschedule construction activities to
determine appropriate disturbance perimeters around the nest.
Monitoring Program:
The City's Natural Resources Manager shall be the lead in reviewing the study and coordinating
with other agencies.
Mitigation Measure.7:
If the Planning Commission approves the requested creek setback exceptions, then.the project
shall.include the following riparian corridor enhancements:
a. Removal of several existing structures located within the required creek.setback area as
shown on the Demolition Site Plan.
b. Removal of invasive plant materials as described in the Riparian Management Plan
prepared by fnma.
c. Creation of expanded riparian restoration areas as shown on Exhibit 2 of the Riparian
Management Plan.
d. Constniction of the emergency access road to be of turf pavers planted with riparian
grasses.
Monitoring Pro ram:
Community Development Department staff shall monitor compliance with this requirement by
insuring that the working drawings for a building permit include all required enhancements and
through subsequent inspections with the Natural Resources Manager.
C.3 8'
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 5
Mitintion Measure 8:
The applicant shall provide a long-range maintenance program for the site's riparian zones which
includes the following:
a. Provision for "specialized" trimming and mowing of the grasses to be planted in the
reinforced plastic grid structural system of the emergency access road, recognizing the
effort to incorporate this area as a functional part of the riparian area.
b. Installation of a "soft" barrier to discourage public access to riparian zones, such as a
split-rail fence between riparian planting and other site improvements, and gates or
bollards at the end of the emergency access road
c. Limitations shall be established for use of the emergency access road to ensure that it
does not become a service and maintenance driveway that invites frequent use.
d. Placements of educational signage at appropriate locations.
e. Requirements for early and on-going inspections by Community Development
Department staff and the Natural Resources Manager.
f. Establishment of a '5-year monitoring program, which includes the submittal of semi-
annual progress reports.
Monitoring Program:
The City's Natural Resources Manager will be the lead in reviewing the long-range maintenance
program with the assistance of the Community Development Department. The provisions of the
plan will need to be in place prior to occupancy and will require on-going implementation.
Mitigation Measure 9:
To assure that the project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Treatment of Historic Properties, the recommended conditions of the CHC are included as
mitigation measures.
a. A detailed HABS/HAER historic inventory report shall be prepared on all existing
buildings in the Motel Inn complex before demolition or construction.
b. At least one of the original bungalows shall be preserved and rehabilitated. Preservation
means making the footprint as authentic as possible, using recycled building components
from the demolished bungalows such as doors, windows and roof tiles, and attempting to
preserve the gypsum block walls. If preservation of the gypsum block walls is not
feasible, then the rebuilt walls shall have the texture, density and color of the original
walls to the greatest degree possible.
e3 -9
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 6
c. The locations of the original courtyard pathways should be retained, although widths may
be modified as needed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
d. The roof of the "Ramada" section should be lowered as much as possible to resemble its
original design.
e. Retain architectural elements removed from the original buildings and reuse or display
them in the museum on site.
f. Retain the site's historic landscape features. .
g. Explore reducing the scale of the buildings in the northeast building wing of the Motel
Inn.
h. Reconsider the scale of the entry tower for the Apple Farm addition.
i. Provide further articulation of the conference building walls and roof to reflect scale and
massing of original Motel Inn buildings.
Monitoring Program:
The Architectural Review Commission shall monitor compliance with this requirement through
the review of detailed plans. Community Development Department staff will then verify
compliance with their review of working drawings for a building permit and subsequent
inspections.
Mitigation Measure 10:
If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources or
cultural materials, then construction activities that may affect them shall cease until the extent of
the resource is determined and the Community Development Director approves appropriate
protective measures. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and
location of discovered materials so that a qualified archaeologist may record them.
Monitoring Program:
Compliance with this requirement shall be monitored through inspections during project
construction by the Community Development Department staff.
Mitigation Measure 11:
If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor shall be
called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of
artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws. A note concerning this requirement shall be
included on the grading and construction plans for the project.
�3 -,0
f
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420(2003 Series)
Page 7
Monitoring Program:
Compliance with this requirement shall be monitored through inspections during project
construction by the Community Development Department staff.
MitiQ,ation Measure 12:
The project shall incorporate the following as feasible:
• Skylights to maximize natural day lighting.
• Operable windows to maximize natural ventilation.
• Energy-efficient lighting systems for both interior and exterior use.
Monitoring Program:
Compliance with this requirement shall be monitored through the review of plans submitted for a
building permit by the Community Development Department staff.
Mitigation Measure 13:
A detailed soils engineering report shall to be submitted, as approved, as part of the grading and
building permit applications. The soils report shall include: data regarding the nature,
distribution and strength of the existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading
procedures including recommendations .to ensure that there are no impacts to the creek, and
design criteria for corrective measures, when necessary. Grading and building must be designed
and performed in compliance with the soils engineering report.
Monitoring Program
The Community Development Department staff will review the recommendations included in
the soils engineering report along with working drawings submitted fora building permit.
Mitigation Measure 14:
The applicant shall follow the recommendations contained in the Phase I environmental site
assessment prepared by Ceres Associates to confirm that any contamination issues have been
adequately addressed prior to site development. All contamination issues must be resolved to the
satisfaction of the Fire Chief prior to construction.
C07
3 —//
Attachment 3
Resolution.No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 8
Monitoring Program:
The Fire Department shall be the lead .in reviewing any subsequent studies necessary and
assuring that any site clean-up has taken place prior to building permits being issued.
MitiLyation Measure 15:
Oil and sand separators or other filtering media shall be installed at each drain inlet intercepting
runoff as a means of filtering toxic substances from run off before it enters the creek directly or
through the storm water system. The separator must be regularly maintained to ensure efficient
pollutant removal and to prevent drains from plugging up and overflowing. Best Management
Practices (BMPs)for drainage shall be followed.
Monitoring Program:
Compliance with this requirement shall be monitored through the review of detailed plans
submitted for building permit primarily by the Utilities Department.
Mitigation Measure 16:
The Architectural Review Commission with their review of project development plans needs to
insure that outdoor use areas are properly attenuated from noise if they require significant
changes to building heights or wall locations surrounding these areas.
Monitoring Pro ram:
The Architectural Review Commission shall monitor compliance with this requirement through
the review of detailed plans. Community Development Department staff will then verify
compliance with their review of working drawings for a building permit and subsequent
inspections.
Mitigation Measure 17:
The Planning Commission with their review of the required use permit shall evaluate whether
proposed decks as designed are consistent with the intent of Criterion No. 2 of Ordinance No.
1130.
Monitoring Program:
The Planning Commission shall monitor compliance with this requirement through the review of
detailed plans. Community Development Department staff will then verify compliance with
their review of working drawings for a building permit and subsequent inspections.
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 9
Mitt adon Measure 18:
To help reduce the waste stream generated:
a. The project shall include convenient facilities for interior and exterior on-site recycling.
b. The project shall include a solid waste recycling plan for recycling discarded materials, such
as concrete, sheetrock, wood, and metals, from the construction site. The plan must be
submitted for approval by the City's Solid Waste Coordinator or the Community
Development Director,prior to building permit issuance.
c. Recycled-content materials shall be used in structural and decorative building components of
the project and in surfacing wherever feasible.
Monitoring Program:
Compliance with this requirement shall be monitored through the review of detailed plans
submitted for architectural review and building permit primarily by the Community
Development Department staff with consultation with the Utilities Department.
SECTION 2. Tentative Tract Man. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Tract
Map Application No.TR 122-01 (County Map No. 2500), a request to establish a 48-unit air-space
condominium,based on the following findings:
1. The design of the tentative map and proposed improvements are consistent with the General
Plan. .
2. The site is physically suited for the type and density of development allowed in the C-T-S zone.
3. The design of the tentative map and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious
health problems, substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish
or wildlife or their habitat.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will not conflict with easements for
access through,or use of property within,the proposed subdivision.
SECTION 3. Tentative Tract Man. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Tract
Map Application No.TR 122-01 (County Map No. 2500), a request to establish a 48-unit air-space
condominium,subject to the following conditions and code requirements:
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series) Attachment 3
Page 10
Conditions
1. The applicant shall submit a final map to the city for review, approval, and recordation. The
map shall be prepared by, or under the supervision of a registered civil engineer or licensed
land surveyor. The final map shall be prepared in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act
and the Subdivision Regulations.
2. The map shall be tied to at least two points of the City's horizontal control network, California
State Plane Coordinate System, Zone 5 (1991.35 epoch adjustment of the North American
Datum of 1983 also referred to as "NAD 83" - meters) for direct import into the Geographic
Information System (GIS) database. Submit this data either via email, CD or a 3-1/2" floppy
disc containing the appropriate data for use with AutoCAD, version 2000 or earlier (model
space in real world coordinates,NAD 83 -m).
3. The final map shall use the International System of Units (metric system). The English
System of Units may be used on the final map where necessary (e.g. - all record data shall be
entered on the map in the record units, metric translations should be in parenthesis), to the
approval of the City Engineer.
4: The applicant shall establish CC&Rs for the regulation of land use control of nuisances and
architectural control of the building and facilities. These CC&Rs shall be approved by the
Community Development Director and administered by a property owners' association.
5. There shall be no change in city_regulated provisions of the CC&Rs without prior approval of
the Community Development Director.
6. The applicant shall include the following provisions in the CC&Rs for the condominium:
a. The property owners' association shall be created to enforce the CC&Rs and provide
for professional, perpetual maintenance of common areas, including, but not limited
to, the driveway,parking lot,landscaping,sewer,utilities,and building exteriors.
b. The right shall be granted to the city to maintain common areas if the property
owners' association fails to do so and to assess said association for expenses
incurred
C. Owner occupancy shall not exceed 28 days per year aggregate,including a limitation
of no more than 7 days between Memorial and Labor days.
d. Owners shall be obligated to pay transient occupancy taxes, or an equivalent fee in-
lieu thereof, to the city in the form presented in the draft CC&Rs for the project.
�, -1141
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 11
7. The Monterey Street access improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Director and CalTrans prior to development or recordation of the final map.
8. The applicant shall submit surveyed cross-sections along the creek channel prepared by a
licensed surveyor or civil engineer to assure that the setbacks shown on working drawings for
new buildings and other improvements are consistent with approved plans and any approved
exceptions to the City's Creek Setback Ordinance.
9. A soils engineer shall evaluate the condition of the creek bank adjacent to the project and
submit a report to the Director of Public Works and Building.Official for review. If the
evaluation identifies recommended slope stabilization or erosion protection, the developer
shall comply with said recommendations, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works
and Building Official. Appropriate permits from applicable agencies must be obtained
10. The final map shall include any required easements required for the reasonable development
of the affected properties. Easements may include.but are not limited to grading, drainage,
water, sewer, storm drainage, access, vehicle tum-around, and utilities. Any maintenance
agreements shall be completed and recorded before or concurrent with final map approval.
11. The demolition/remodel of the existing building triggers the Utilities Department Sewer Lateral
Abandonment Policy. This policy states that the sewer lateral must be abandoned at the main
prior to demolition unless the lateral is intended for reuse and it passes a video inspection. If the
sewer lateral is intended for reuse, the owner shall submit a VHS videotape documenting the
internal condition of the pipe to the Utilities Department for approval.
12.The irrigation systems for common areas, detention basins, and other large landscape areas
shall be designed and constructed as separate systems from the domestic water service, or be
designed and constructed such that they may be easily separated from the domestic service,
to allow for the potential future use.of reclaimed water, well water or other non-potable water
source. Appropriate backflow protection shall be installed with to the satisfaction of the
County Cross Connection Inspector,Henry Ruiz.
13. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9(b)(1), the subdivider shall defend, indemnify
and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City or it agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or
annul an approval of the City, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body concerning
this subdivision. The City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action or
proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.
J Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 12
Code Requirements
1. Separate sewer, water and other utility services are required to serve each separate parcel
with development on any parcel, to the satisfaction of the Utilities Engineer, Public Works
Director and the respective utility companies.
2. The owner's engineer shall submit water demand and wastewater generation calculations so
that the City can make a determination as to the adequacy of the supporting infrastructure. If
it is discovered that an offsite deficiency exists, the owner will be required to mitigate the
deficiency as a part of the overall project.
3. A water allocation is required, due to the additional demand on the City's water supplies.
The City currently has water to allocate, and does so on a "first-come, first-served" basis.
Water-is allocated at the time building permits are issued and the Water Impact Fee is paid.
Both the Water and the Wastewater Impact Fees are based on the size of the water meter(s)
serving the development with appropriate credit given for prior accounts on the property.
Water and Wastewater Impact Fees shall be paid at the time building permits are issued.
4. Appropriate backflow prevention will be necessary on any connection to the City water
system due to the existing well on the property. If the well is not to be used,this requirement
can be avoided by properly destroying the well in accordance with the standards of the
County Department of Environmental Health. If deemed suitable, the well can be used for
irrigation purposes, thereby reducing the amount of the required water allocation. All
backflow preventers shall be approved by the University of Southern California Foundation
for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research, and shall be located within twenty-
five feet (25') of a public main. The project shall be coordinated with the County Cross-
Connection Inspector, Henry Ruiz.
5. The subject property is situated primarily within Flood Hazard Zone B. The San Luis Obispo
Creek and certain portions of`overbank"areas he within Flood Zone A. The 100-year storm
flood elevation varies between El. 285 and El. 295 (+1-) along the creek frontage of the site,
from the southerly to northerly property lines. (1929 USGS datum) All proposed new
structures lie within a B-Zone, which simply requires all finished floors of new buildings to
be at least one-ft. above current adjacent grade.
6. The grading and site plans and building elevations must utilize City datum and provide notes
in this regard. It should be noted that the current City datum is 0.749 in (2.46 ft.) higher than
the 1929 USGS datum, which is the datum on the flood hazard maps. Appropriate cross-
referencing of this equation is therefore required on the plans.
Attachment 3
Resolution No. 9420 (2003 Series)
Page 13
7. A separate connection shall be required for automatic fire sprinklers. The fire service lateral
shall include a USC approved backflow preventer appropriate for the proposed use. The
backflow preventer shall be located as close to the public right-of-way as possible, in direct
alignment with the connection to the public water main. The backflow preventer can be
located no further than 25 feet from the right-of-way line without prior written approval of
the Utilities Engineer. If the fire service supports one or more fire hydrants, the USC
approved backflow preventer shall also include detector capabilities (double detector check
assembly). The FDC may be located behind the backflow prevention assembly, in.
accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. The location and orientation of the FDC
shall be approved by the Fire Department.
8. By ordinance, the applicant is required to prepare a recycling plan for approval by the City to
address the recycling of construction waste for projects valued at over$50,000 or demolition
of structures over 1000 square feet. The recycling plan shall be submitted to the Building
Department with the building plans. The City's Solid Waste Coordinator can provide some
guidance in the preparation of an appropriate recycling plan. .
On motion of Council Member Settle, seconded by Council Member Ewan, and on the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members Ewan and Settle,Vice Mayor Mulholland and Mayor Romero
NOES: Council Member Schwartz
ABSENT: None
The foregoing resolution was adopted this 4m day of February 2003.
01
/ Mayor David F. Romero
A T:
Lee Price,C.M.C.
City Clerk
APPROVED /AS TO FO
Gilbert A.Trujillo
Acting City Attorney
Attachment 4
V E N T U R E S
December 8,2005
Pam Ricci
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Re: Time Extension for Motel Inn Tract& Use Permit 122-01 (2223 Monterey Street)
Dear Pam:
Per my email to you last week, we hereby request a one-year time extension for the Motel Inn
Tract and associated Use Permit(WA/ER 122-01). This tentative map was originally approved
by the City Council on February 4, 2003; the use permit on February 2, 2003. Enclosed please
find check#31326, in the amount of$2,036.00 to cover time extension processing fees.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions or require fii then
information Otherwise, please confirm the receipt of this request by email at
rkovesdi@ldngventures.net. Thank you for your attention
Sincerely,
King Vemures
Rachel K.Kovesdi
Project Planner
Resolution "A" Attachment 5
RESOLUTION NO. (2006 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
APPROVING A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL MAP
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2500
(City File#TR 122-01, 2223 MONTEREY STREET)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Findinas. That this council, after consideration of public testimony,
the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and reports thereon, found that the one-year time
extension is justified.
SECTION 2. Action. That a one-year time extension for filing the final map for
Tentative Tract Map No. 2500 is granted to February 4, 2007, subject to the original findings and
conditions of tentative map approval, as specified in City Council Resolution No. 9420 (2003
Series).
On motion of , seconded by , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2006.
City Council Resolution No. (2006 Series)
Page 2
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
City Clerk Audrey Hooper
j
4Attomey
Jonathan P. Lowell
ResVM 122.01 (approve extension)
Resolution "B"
RESOLUTION NO. (2006 Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
DENYING A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR FILING THE FINAL MAP
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2500
(City File#TR 122-01, 2223 MONTEREY STREET)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. Fes. That this council, after consideration of public testimony,
the subdivider's request, staff recommendations and.reports thereon,found that the one-year time
extension is not justified because:
1. The subdivider has not made reasonable progress toward fulfilling tract conditions;
and
2. There are not extenuating circumstances that justify delays in proceeding with the
final map.
SECTION 2. Action. That a one-year time extension for filing the final map for
Tentative Tract Map No. 2500 is denied.
On motion of , seconded by , and on
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of 2006.
r
City Council Resolution No. (2006 Series)
Page 2
Mayor David F. Romero
ATTEST:
City Clerk Audrey Hooper
APPROVED:
City Attorney Jonathan P. Lowell
Res\TR 122-01(deny extension)
G.3 -22