Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/07/2006, PH1 - 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG) AND REQUEST FROM THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSI i council M�°W1#71b j aGEnaa RepoRt C I T Y O F SAN LU IS OBISPO FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director Prepared By: Doug Davidson,Housing Programs Manager SUBJECT: 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM (CDBG) AND REQUEST FROM THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION (HRC) TO INVESTIGATE THE SECTION 108 LOAN AS A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO REHABILITATE OR REPLACE THE MAXINE LEWIS HOMELESS SHELTER CAO RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt a resolution approving the 2006 CDBG Program activities and funding as recommended by the Human Relations Commission (HRC), with adjustments based on the new funding estimate(Attachment 1). 2. Endorse the Urban County's Draft One-year Action Plan, including Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME), Special Urban Projects, and Emergency Shelter Grant funding. 3. Forward the Council's actions and funding recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. 4. As requested by the HRC, and consistent with Council's recent.action during the Mid- Year Budget review, work with the Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC), the County and other stakeholders to review homeless needs and possible longer-term funding mechanisms, including a Section 108 Loan. REPORT-IN-BRIEF The City received 11 CDBG funding.requests for the 2006 Program Year (July 1, 2006 through June, 2007), totaling about $759,600. Estimated City CDBG funding for 2006 is $645,914, approximately $73,000 less than last year's funding. Recommended CDBG funding requests this year include: 1) continued operation and maintenance of the Homeless Shelter, 2) improvements at the Prado Day Center; 3) improved accessibility for disabled persons at City facilities and on City streets, 4) rehabilitation of the Historic Adobes, 4) Hotline phone information and referral services, and 5) Program Administration. It is a sign of success that the City did not receive a request for a housing project this year. The non-profit home builders are busy using previously awarded City funds. The Housing Authority 2006 Community Develoument Block Grant Program Page 2 is finishing up the senior housing project on Ella Street, out to bid on the North Chorro Street project; and starting to design the Cooperative housing project. Also on the Housing Authority's plate are the Parkwood Village condominiums and the Margarita Area land dedication. The People's Self-Help Housing project on South Higuera has been approved and is nearing start of construction. That project received CDBG and HOME funds and is expected to file a request for the City's Affordable Housing Fund. Staff worked closely with Habitat for Humanity and was expecting an application from them until their real estate transaction fell through at the last minute. We expect that housing projects will be a big piece of CDBG applications again next year. As called for by the City's CDBG procedure, the HRC reviewed the 11 funding requests and made recommendations. The HRC recommends funding certain projects — some at amounts lower than requested, some at higher amounts than requested. This report describes the 2006 CDBG program in more detail, as well as the specific recommendations by the Council's advisory body. DISCUSSION The County has issued a draft Summary One-Year Action Plan. The Action Plan describes activities proposed for funding by the entire Urban County, which includes the cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, Paso Robles, and San Luis Obispo; and unincorporated San Luis Obispo County, including CDBG, Home Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funds, and program income. The draft Action Plan is summarized in this report, but the Council has approval authority only over those CDBG activities requesting City funding. Council may recommend projects to receive Special Urban Projects, HOME and ESG funds, although this step is not required. The required 30-day public review period has closed and Council may now take final action on the draft Action Plan and CDBG program. The Board of Supervisors is tentatively scheduled to act on the draft Action Plan in April 2006. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) then reviews the plan and notifies the County in June, once it is approved. Funding usually starts in September once grant agreements and environmental reviews are completed. Recent Changes to Funding Picture. This year the "Urban County" is expected to receive about $242,096 less than last year. Countywide estimates are $2,144,593 in CDBG funds, $1,345,000 in Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds, and $91,799 in Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funds. The estimated 2006 CDBG allocations for each participating jurisdiction in the Urban County are: Arroyo Grande: $108,354 Atascadero: $191,569 Grover Beach: $126,119 Paso Robles: $284,387 San Luis Obispo: $645,914 County: 788,251 2006 Community Development Block Grant Program J Page 3 Again, San Luis Obispo City's estimated allocation is actually $73,000 less than our 2005 allocation. This is because anticipated Congressional spending on CDBG decreased over 2005 and the number of participating jurisdictions continues to grow. This new figure is still an estimate, although it's more definite because it's from HUD and based on actual proposed federal spending levels. However, it is subject to change when HUD announces the final CDBG funding figures. Based on previous experience, this could take place sometime in late March or April or when the federal budget is approved. HUD Objectives and Rules. The Urban County's CDBG activities must, by law, meet HUD objectives and rules. HUD has three broad national objectives: 1. To benefit persons and households with incomes below 80 percent of area median incomes ($49,350 for a four-person household); 2. To aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; and 3. To meet urgent community development needs that pose a serious, immediate threat to public health or welfare, such as floods, earthquakes or other disasters. CDBG-eligible activities include: acquisition of real property, construction or rehabilitation of public facilities and improvements, site/building clearance and demolition, tenant relocation, provision of certain types of public services, removal of architectural barriers, housing rehabilitation, historic preservation, code enforcement, special economic development activities, planning studies and grant administration. HUD requires that at least 70 percent of the Urban County's grants go to activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. At least 51 percent of individual project or program funds must benefit low- and moderate-income persons, and up to 20 percent of the City's total funding can be used for overall CDBG program administration and other indirect costs. Up to 15 percent of the Urban County's CDBG funds can go toward Public Services. Community Needs Hearings and Workshops. The Urban County hosted "needs" hearings at several locations throughout the County to allow the public to identify community problems and needs. The City's Human Relations Commission hosted one of the needs hearings at its September 7, 2005, meeting. About 25 people attended the hearing and addressed a wide variety of community needs. These included homeless services, affordable housing, senior services, and communication services. Council Goals and Priorities. At its October 18, 2005 public hearing, Council reviewed the HRC recommendation and unanimously agreed by approving the 2006 CDBG funding priorities shown below: Rank Approved 2006 CDBG Program Priorities I Emergency shelter for homeless persons. Maintain existing services and building resources for future needs. 2 Enhance and develop housing affordable to low and very-low income persons,including seniors. 3 Education concerning and/or removal of architectural barriers for the disabled and elderly. 4 Economic development(to include seismic retrofit,enhance economic stability,communication infrastructure,and provide'obs for low/moderate incomepersons). 2006 Community Develoament Block Grant Program Page 4 Advisory Body Recommendation. The HRC reviewed the CDBG applications in a workshop on November 30, 2005 and held a public hearing on December 7, 2005 to review the 2006 CDBG funding requests. The Commission recommended funding the activities shown in Attachment 1, and their actions are further described in the HRC minutes, Attachments 2 and 3. Table 1 follows the HRC's recommendations in that it fully funds the activities the HRC supported, but has been revised only to reflect HUD's most current funding estimate. (The HRC's recommendation was based on an estimate of $668,000) The next section of the report reviews each of the applications. Applications Recommended1or CDBG Funding Application 1-06. Homeless Shelter Operation ($96,887). Funding for the continued operation of the SLO Homeless Shelter. Funding amount requested is unchanged from last year— amount recommended is less due to the smaller total grant. Public services, such as homeless shelter operations, are limited to 15 percent of the total allocation. The operation and maintenance of the Homeless Shelter remains the City's top priority for CDBG funding. Application 6-06. ADA Corrections at City Facilities ($122,600). CDBG funding is proposed for ADA-related improvements at 24 City facilities. The improvements address a wide range of features including signage, handrails, dispensers, fixtures, ramps, doors, and public counters. This third and final phase must be completed by September, 2007 based on the audit and settlement agreement with the Department of Justice. Application 7-06. Sidewalk Access Ramps and Sidewalk Replacements To Improve Accessibility For Disabled Or Elderly Persons ($137,044). Funding for on-going construction of intersection improvements to meet ADA standards. There is a backlog of street intersections needing handicapped ramps, and the additional funding allows the City to install more ramps than would be possible under the Public Works' "base" request. The HRC wanted to fully fund the ADA Corrections, Historic Adobes, and Prado Day Center Improvements, so this allocation was slightly cut back from its $150,000 request. Application 8-06. Historic Adobes Rehabilitation ($110,200). Although "adobes" were not specifically mentioned in the Council's CDBG priorities, "blight removal" is an allowed HUD activity under the category of Economic Development. Because the City has not had the funding needed to improve upon the severe deterioration of our adobes — and because we did not get housing applications this year—the HRC felt that 2006 presented a unique opportunity to allocate funds to adobe rehabilitation. Upon successful rehabilitation of the Rodriguez Adobe, the attention has shifted to the Butron and La Loma Adobes. For the Butron Adobe, the next phase of rehabilitation involves removing the non-historical additions to the building, securing the openings, and installing security lighting. The most critical improvements at the La Loma Adobe include bracing of the leaning walls, shoring up the siding, securing the openings, and installing security lighting. These improvements are estimated at approximately $55,000 each, so the grant for this activity would be split equally between the two adobes. Without the competition of a housing project this year, the HRC recommended increasing the funding of the $100,000 request to maximize CDBG funding for the project this year. /-y 2006 Community Development Block Grant Prop-ram Page 5 Application 9-06. EOC—Prado Day Center Improvements ($50,000). This is in addition to the General Fund commitment of $50,000 for operations and maintenance of the Day Center. The improvements include driveway surfacing, fencing, electrical, and an upgrade of the women's restroom. Application 10-06. Program Administration ($120,583). Funding for city costs to administer the Community Development Block Grant program and to develop and implement an expanded affordable housing program. This year's proposed allocation is slightly less than the requested $125,000 in order to increase the Hotline request (below), but will be adequate to retain proper administration of the program. The total recommended program administration funding includes funds for both general program administration and continued funding for the Housing Programs Manager position. Application 11-06. Hotline Phone Center ($8,600). Hotline proposes to use CDBG funds to hire a consultant to coordinate and implement an application to the PUC for a 2-1-1 telephone system. The 2-1-1 system provides callers with information and referrals to human services and supplements the 9-1-1 system. The HRC recommended using CDBG funds this year for a 2-1-1 system. Based on public testimony at the Needs workshop and HRC hearings, the HRC recommends an additional $6,600 beyond the requested amount to help establish the 2-1-1 system. Applications Not Recommended for CDBG Funding Applications 2-06 through 5-06 (Attachment 1) would fund "public services" as defined under HUD rules. Under those rules, there is a 15 percent cap on the amount of CDBG funds that can be used for public services. The City fully expends its public services capacity each year by funding homeless services. Consequently, while these additional public service requests are eligible and meet a community need, there is not sufficient public services capacity to fund them using CDBG funds. Given the City's priority commitment to funding Prado Day Center, the $50,000 request for Prado Day Center operation would be funded using General Funds, in keeping with prior Council direction. The other three Public Service requests (Applications 3-5) have been referred to the Grants-in-Aid (GIA) program or may be successful in gaining CDBG funds from other jurisdictions. Special Urban Projects Funding. Under the Cooperation Agreement, 15 percent of the net County funding is set-aside annually for a "Special Urban Projects Fund." Funds are available to all participating jurisdictions on a competitive basis and are awarded by the Board of Supervisors. As with HOME and ESG funds, the proposed activities are recommended by county staff. Special urban projects are those that are more regional in scope, meet an urgent community need, provide direct benefit to very needy groups (very-low income, disabled persons, at-risk youth), and would not be feasible without special funding assistance. $125,737 (includes 15 percent of unincorporated county program income) is available in the 2006 Program Year. The following table shows the proposed use of Special Urban Project Funds. These activities qualify as Special Urban Projects by serving critical needs of low-income residents 2006 Community Development.Block Grant Program Page 6 from throughout San Luis Obispo County. Draft County Recommended Special Urban Projects, 2006 Recommended Project Name Applicant Fundin ($) Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter,Operation EOC 100,737 Prado Day Center, Operation EOC 25,000 TOTAL 1259737 HOME Funding. The Urban County expects to receive $1,445,518 in formula HOME funds in 2006, including program income. HOME funds are being recommended for three housing projects in Grover Beach, Avila Beach, and Paso Robles. The HOME-funded recommendation that would directly benefit City residents is $250,000 to the Housing Authority of the City of San Luis Obispo for countywide tenant based rental assistance. ESG Funding. The Urban County is estimated to receive $91,799 in Emergency Shelter Grant Funds in 2006. Of this, approximately $43,393 is tentatively slated for the Maxine Lewis Memorial Shelter, $14,654 for the Prado Day Center, $7,547 for the SLO Women's Shelter, and the balance earmarked for homeless services and facilities in other County areas. Homeless Shelter Rehabilitation or Replacement—Section 108 Loan as a.Possible Solution During the November 30, 2005 HRC meeting, Housing Programs Manager Doug Davidson gave the HRC an overview of the Section 108 Loan Program. The program allows up to five years of potential CDBG funds to be borrowed at one time, thus allowing a larger project to be financed by leveraging multiple years of funding. The City was very successful in its prior (and only) 108 loan used for the Brizzolara Apartments (Housing Authority) and rehabilitation of the Carnegie Library. Downsides to the 108 loan program are the additional security requirement (real property) and the long-term commitment of future CDBG funds. The application process is lengthy and paper intensive. A loan consultant and appraiser were hired to help with the year long application process the last time. Furthermore, after 30 years as a stable federal program, CDBG is now in an era of uncertainty. Although, the program survived this year, many Washington observers expect next year's federal budget to once again propose the Strengthening America's Communities Initiative, effectively eliminating CDBG. Finally, the City is receiving less CDBG funding every year; a trend that is expected to continue and impact the ability to pay off a large loan with CDBG funds. After discussion and recognition of the risks associated with a Section 108 Loan application, the HRC moved to suggest using the Section 108 Loan Program as a catalyst to start dialogue with other agencies regarding the long term viability of the homeless shelter and suggested that Council direct appropriate staff to investigate the Section 108 Loan program as a possible solution to rehabilitate or replace the shelter. As Council knows, on February 2151 during the discussion of the Mid-Year Budget report, Councilman Brown was designated by Council to work with the EOC, the County and other stakeholders to review homeless shelter needs and I l 2006 Community Development Block Grant Program Page 7 short-and long-term funding options. Councilman Brown and staff have already met with the County and the EOC regarding the short-term crisis and will provide a recommendation to the Council for consideration on March 21S`. The Section 108 loan program can be a part of the discussion regarding longer-term solutions. FISCAL IMPACT Overall, CDBG funding has a beneficial fiscal effect. To the extent that qualified, on-going City programs are funded through the CDBG program, more General Fund monies are available for other important capital projects and programs. The CAO recommendation will result in an adverse fiscal impact of$6,600 based on the Hotline program award of $8,600 (v. the $2,000 requested.) Staff believes this is a relatively minor impact and supports the HRC action on helping the Hotline program get up and running this year. ALTERNATIVES 1. Revise CDBG projects and funding levels. The City Council may change the list of projects to receive City CDBG funding, and/or change the funding levels from those recommended. ATTACHMENTS 1. Recommended 2006 CDBG Program (Table 1) 2. Human Relations Commission Minutes, November 30, 2005 3. Human Relations Commission Minutes, December 7, 2005 4. Draft Council Resolution Council Reading File: 2006 CDBG City Applications dd/CDBG/CCCDBG06Rpt 7 Al fACHMENT 1 10 COODvrn cn4WNc m 0 . mDm = c) �vcnmc� c� c» tnaoc� = mmm -ny FCo -• o CO _ _ _. c cn c w 0Oc 06 3 O (Do Ono 0 17 0 Oo N ID nnn m r► cn fn fn fnr. z CL DCnODD 000 Dm ° D m zIn rr ar = ryCD 'a v mC -00 3cc Wm m ° N CL oo Zg yg y o C m O Z m w (D m O n n z N Tn = f0 CL C3 3N N Z CL w w @ O O rn (n m 3 C o a $ 0D Cmp - L0 ri) mo m N : D w a I m Ch. y m o Q- no w 0 D � QnCD O ID -0 fD 7 � y �' j CD N = CD x. 03mm D mn pm O 0 < 9 .nom. W 05. SD n zO aL � � 3 w a m m (D to 171 o w m CD o -: CD °: a'' 0 t0 w COCD 3 � A A m C y n z 3 m cn N N N On O fn N i 1 O W c (O V NUt N000 N OODOAOOD mOOO OO O O M 000000 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 Q. O O O O 00000 000000 cai+ c^o � o CO00 -CO N p °' vo Wco0OOD 0o � o °w0 000 t� � AW w •ta00460 v -4 3 0 c o 4 O 0 ; i o � CmA w w Ow yt3 3 v �a s O a 4tNC � O COOO V N OOD TCDD 0 O. N00 D O O D �a 0 O OP O O 0 O V W W A O 040 O 0 0 O , 1� I � rlC k Human Relations Commission Minutes November 30, 2005 Page 3 ACTION: Wolff/Wheeler to continue this item to the December 7, 2005 HRC meeting to allow commissioners to obtain more information regarding the resolution;-motion carried 6:0. Item 2. REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG). (DAVIDSON) Item 3 was taken before Item 2. Housing Programs Manager Davidson presented an overview of the CDBG applications. He noted the number of applicants were down from last year. He further reported that the City expected CDBG funding to be reduced from the 2005 amount but still be more than adequate to cover the 2006 requests. Chairperson Nichols inquired whether the HRC had the ability to award more than an applicant requested. Commissioner Wolff was also interested in granting more than requested and inquired if the public service award was still limited to 15% of available funds. Housing Programs Manager Davidson replied that the public service award cap was still at 15% and suggested the HRC consider reallocating the excess funds. He noted the adobes were in poor condition and needed urgent stop-gap improvements to prevent further damage. Chairperson Nichols asked if the HRC could reallocate the excess funding to last year's applicants. She also inquired if staff had asked Hospice if these funds could assist them in completing their elevator project or was this project truly dead. Housing Proqrams Manager Davidson reported the project was truly dead. He stated Hospice had the funds for three years and were still unable to go forward with the elevator. He also clarified that past applicants could have applied for additional funds through the current CDBG process if they were in need. Commissioner Wolff noted he is a board member of Hospice and reported Hospice willingly returned the funding with the plan to place the project on hold and reapply in the future. Vice Chairperson Lamb.inquired if staff had investigated if there were other applicants' projects that had cost-over runs to see if the funds could be used elsewhere. CADOCUME-1\s1ouser\LOCALS-1\TempWO V EMB-LDOC g fACH ENU „:. `` :' Human Relations Commission Minutes November 30, 2005 Page 4 Chairperson Nichols noted the fire station project had cost-over runs. She wondered if there were other grantees who also experienced cost-over runs and who could have used the returned elevator funds if they knew the funds were available. Housing Programs Manager Davidson replied the other grantees could have reapplied this year and they did not. Vice Chairperson Lamb argued the Fire Department did not reapply. He further stated there must have been other things in the pipeline that needed money too. He felt staff should have gone to other applicants. Director of Human Resources Irons noted that the Fire Department would have reapplied due to the cost-over runs if the elevator money had not been returned. She noted Hospice would have reapplied this year had they been closer to completing their project. To answer Vice Chairperson's Lamb other point she inquired if the City had a process in place where staff monitors the CDBG projects to see how they were progressing. Housing Programs Manager Davidson reported that he talked to the grant recipients on a regular basis. Commissioner Wolff suggested giving more funding to the Prado Day Center. Commissioner Wheeler spoke to the need for a long term preservation plan for the adobes. Vice.Chairperson Lamb noted sometime ago the adobes' supporters formed a non profit group which entered into a partnership with the City. He reported the group later disbanded and the plan dissolved. He expressed concern that the adobes were deteriorating more and more. He stated the current priority should be to stabilize them so they don't fall down because they add to the quality of life and richness of the City. Commissioner Wolff spoke in favor of increasing the Hotline grant. Commissioners concurred. Item 3. REVIEW OF THE SECTION 108 LOAN PROGRAM. (DAVIDSON) This item was taken before Item 2. C:\DOCUME-I tdouserWCALS-1\Temp\NOVEMB-I.DOC Al ACHMENT Human Relations Commission Minutes November 30, 2005 Page 5 Housing Programs Manager Davidson gave a broad overview of the Section 108 Home Program. He cautioned that due to the uncertainty of the future CDBG funding, a Section 108 Loan may be risky. He noted these funds require a long term commitment. Commissioners discussed the pros and cons of the Section 108 Loan Program, transitional housing, the need for more affordable housing, and the urgent need to replace and repair the homeless shelter. ACTION: Moved by Lamb/Wolff to use the Section 108 Loan Program (given that the homeless shelter is deteriorating) as a catalyst to start dialogue with other agencies regarding the long term viability of the homeless shelter and ask Council to direct staff to investigate the Section108 Loan Program as a possible solution to rehabilitate or replace the shelter; motion carried 6:0. Item 4. REVIEW OF THE HOUSING PROGRAMS MANAGER POSITION. (DRAZE) This taken was taken out of order following Item 1. Deputy_Director of Community Development Draze presented a historical review of how the Housing Programs Manager's position came to be, clarified the need for the current position, and highlighted the many accomplishments the City has achieved because this position was in place. He reported the City planned to ask Council to consider making this position a permanent budgeted position in lieu of a contract position. He asked the HRC for feedback. Vice Chairperson Lamb inquired if this position was funded with CDBG grant money. Deputy_Director of Community Development Draze indicated currently it was, but it could not be funded with CDBG grants when it became a permanent position. Vice Chairperson Lamb spoke in support of making this a permanent position. He believed former staff was spread too thin to dedicate itself to housing. He felt if the City was going to be proactive to create more affordable housing it needed to dedicate a position to work toward that goal. Commissioner Wheeler was also supportive. Commissioner Wolff agreed this position needed to be permanent in order to promote affordable housing in the City of San Luis Obispo. C ADOCUME—I Wouser\LOCALS—I UempW OV EM B—I.DOC Ai- TACH1-Mk' NT* Human Relations Commission Minutes November 30, 2005 Page 6 Commissioners Forsberg and Gingg supported going forward to make this position permanent. Chairperson Nichols also agreed the City needed the position. She stated the issue that needed consideration was whether or not the City had been able to multiply the resources to legitimize the expense. Since the City was getting funds from other sources and generating more affordable housing and money for affordable housing, that justified a permanent position. Item 5. REVIEW OF THE.GRANTS IN AID YEAR END REPORTS. (HRC LIAISONS) Commissioners agreed to postpone this item until the following meeting of December 7, 2005. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Chairperson Nichols reported she had been invited to attend the Red Cross open house on December 13, 2005 but she was unable to attend. Commissioner Forsberg offered to attend in her place. There being no further business to come before the HRC, Chairperson Nichols. adjourned the HRC meeting at 7:13 p.m. to Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Hearing Room, City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully Submitted, Mary Kopecky Human Resources Executive Assistant CADOCUME—I Wcuser\L.00ALS-1\TempWOVEMB—I.DOC /1Z Human Relations Commission Minutes December 7, 2005 Page 2 Catherine.Manning, EOC Director of Homeless Services, summarized events, statistics, neighborhood relations, and needs of the Homeless Shelter for the past quarter. She noted currently there were only enough funds to carry the shelter through March 2006. She stated she is working with the County, City and other organizations to address funding needs. Ms. Manning also noted parking had become somewhat of an issue due to the new business development across the street from the shelter. Brief HRC discussion ensued. ACTION: Moved by Gingg/Sant to approve Homeless Shelter funding for the next quarter; motion carried 4:0 (Forsberg and Sant had not arrived when the vote was taken, Wheeler absent). PUBLIC HEARING Item 2. REVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS_ (CDBG). (DAVIDSON —40 MINUTES) Housing Programs Manager.Davidson noted CDBG recommendations would be going to the City Council on March 7, 2006. He presented a detailed summary of the current recommendations and asked the HRC for feedback. Chairperson Nichols opened this item for public comment. Betsy Bertrando urged the HRC to support staff recommendations regarding the historical adobes. Ann Hercheck, a SLO citizen residing near a historic adobe, strongly urged the HRC to direct the funding for historic adobes toward drainage, roof repair, arbor repair and lighting. Even Mendelson, representing Hotline, presented an update on the progress being made toward the implementation of a 211 phone system in San Luis Obispo. Bob Vessley, spoke in support of adobe preservation. Lillian Judd, representing the Economic Opportunity Commission (EOC), spoke in support of the CDBG EOC Homeless Shelter and Prado Day Center. Chuck Crotser, Cultural Heritage Committee Member, spoke in support of the adobes, the Prado Day Center and the Homeless Shelter. C:\DOCUME-1\slouseALDCALS-1\Temp\DECEMB—I.DOC Q Human Relations Commission Minutes December 7, 2005 Page 3 Seeing no other speakers Chairperson Nichols closed the public comment portion of the meeting. Commissioner Sant questioned the adobe recommendations. He indicated he was more supportive of funding the Day Center. Commissioner Wolff replied this year was very unique because there were no housing applications so funding was available for other uses. He spoke in support of reallocating $8,000 for Hotline to increase their funding. Chairperson Nichols noted the funds could not be added to public service funding because that was already completely funded at the 15% level. Commissioner Wolff expressed frustration the HRC could not increase the public service funds because he wanted the Hotline grant increased. Vice Chairperson Lamb noted housing applications were a top HRC priority but since there were no housing applications this year, he could support funding the adobes. Chairperson Nichols suggested the Hotline grant could be increased if the funds were used to pay for the bricks and mortar" of the 211 telephone system. Because there were no housing applications this year, she was supportive of using this one-time window to increase the Hotline grant. She urged staff to raise the issue of inadequate shelter funding to Council during the mid-year budget discussions. She asked Police Chief Linden and Fire Chief Callahan their opinions of a 211 telephone system. Police Chief Linden responded City and County law enforcement would welcome another system that could give citizens information during an emergency. Fire Chief Callahan also spoke in support citing the value of directing disaster victims to the appropriate agencies for assistance while Fire staff may be on the streets assisting those in more critical need. ACTION: Moved by Lamb/Wolff to approve staff's CDBG recommendations with the following modifications: • Increase the Hotline Grant from $2,000 to $8,600. • Reduce the HC Street Improvement Grant from $168,200 to $151,400 which was more than requested. • Set aside the remaining $10,200 for the Historic Adobe Rehabilitation with the funds to be used for drainage at the Butron C:\DOCUME—I\slousetU.00ALS—I\Temp\DECEMB—I.DOC �y Human Relations Commission Minutes December 7, 2005 Page 4 Adobe. If the drainage work were to be donated and therefore the funds not needed, the funds would be released back into the CDBG Fund; motion carried 7:0. 2006 CDBG HRC RECOMMENDATION Amount Recommended Amount No. Applicant Activity Requested 2006- 7 Total CDBG Public Services 1 EOC Homeless Shelter-Operation 138,000 100,200 37,8001 138,000 2 EOC Prado Day Center.-Operation 50,000 50,0001 50,000 3 Harvest Bag Food Distribution 4,000 4 Cuesta College Small Business Dev.Center 10,000 5 Biq Brothers Biq Sisters I Mentoring At-Risk Children 1 8 000 SUBTOTAL,Public Services 15% 210,000 :1 100,200 87,800 188,000 Public Facilities 6 City of SLO ADA Corrections City facilities 122,600 122,600 122,600 7 City of SLO HC Street Improvements 150,000 151,400 151,400 8 City of SLO Historic Adobe Rehabilitation 50,000 110,200 110,200 Prado Day Center- 9 EOC Improvements 35,000 50,000 50,000 SUBTOTAL,Public Facilities- 65% 357,600 434,200 434,200 Program AdminfCapacity 10 City of SLO Program Administration 125,000 125,000 125 000 11 Hotline of SLO County Counseling-Phone Call Center 2,000 , 8,600 8,600 SUBTOTAL, Program Admin/Capacity -20% 127.000 . 133,600 133 600 TOTAL 694,600 _ 668 1,000.. _87,800._ Z55,800 Estimated Funding for CDBG Program Year 2006:$668,000 1 Funded through the City General Fund BUSINESS ITEMS CONTINUED Item 3. UPDATE FROM THE TRANSIENT TASK FORCE. (KISER- 15 MINUTES) Principal Analyst Kiser gave a historical overview of the Transient Task Force and reviewed their current challenges. C:\DOCUME-I\slouser\LOCALS-I\Temp\DECEMB-I.DOC RESOLUTION NO. (2006 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING THE 2006 CDBG PROGRAM AND ENDORSING THE SAN LUIS OBISPO URBAN COUNTY'S DRAFT ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo is a participating jurisdiction in the San Luis Obispo Urban County, along with the cities of Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, Grover Beach, and Paso Robles, and the County of San Luis Obispo; and WHEREAS, said cities and County cooperatively administer several federal grant programs under the provisions of the Cooperative Agreement approved by the San Luis Obispo City Council on July 13, 1999 and as amended on September 7, 1999, July 16, 2002, and June 28, 2005 and under applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) rules; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement, the Urban County Public Participation Plan and HUD rules, the City Council held a public hearing on March 7, 2006 to consider funding recommendations by the Human Relations Commission (HRC), to review applications for federal grant funding, and to consider public comments on community needs and on the use of such funds; and WHEREAS, the Council also considered the Urban County's proposed One-Year Action Plan, including proposed funding allocations for Home Investment Partnership Funds (HOME), Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG), and the Special Urban Projects Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The Council hereby determines that the proposed funding actions are not "projects" as defined by Section 21065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since they will not cause a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and do not involve the issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate or other entitlement. Consequently, no further environmental review is necessary. SECTION 2. 2006 Community Development Block Program. The City's 2006 Community Development Block Program, as shown in Exhibit A, is hereby approved. SECTION 3. One-Year Action Plan. The San Luis Obispo Urban County's Draft One- Year Action Plan is hereby endorsed, as shown in Exhibit B. SECTION 4. Board of Supervisors Consideration. The Council hereby directs staff to forward the above actions to the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors for consideration prior to the Board's final action on the Urban County's 2006 Consolidated Plan. //le Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 5. City Administrative Officer Authority. The City Administrative Officer is authorized to act on behalf of the City in executing grant agreements and other actions necessary to implement the approved Consolidated Plan and CDBG Program. Upon motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this 7th day of March, 2006. Mayor Dave Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonath ell, City Attorney Exhibits: A - Approved 2006 CDBG Program for the City of San Luis Obispo B —Draft County 2006 One-Year Action Plan dd/1Jcdbg/CCResoCDBG06 /7 \ \MBITA 0 C:) o = wc a # w " " / . Amo@O@ s � M000VWMoMMMV O -M (A c0 - cc � c ■ 00c . ■ � � 2 / a22 � 3aa / 10 27 � o o / m / E > E � 3 � rrrm > CD0 CA K cIn r % O � r ooOirQ £ �. 2 . � m . � � / �0 3 kCD � B ■ c nn o@ CD � � ■ —n ƒ C O E > ° E ;2 J n CL $ Un - / 0II > ' I@7 -v2 0 ■ 3 k k \ > \ § \_ 0 k § � CD \ ° \ / � Co CD � > oke ■ $ . m \ , k n / ƒ3 CD c7 3 k > 5 e e 0 � � k � CD C / / " CDrn � � � / n � � o m K !_ 7 ° - - O < ' - � 2m 7 § / CL � m / - w 6 k k \ k ƒ g k 0 CD § :3 W X CD § 0 . c > 2 dG t ro Cn3 (n % aw (Dc ewN) a N 0000 # 0 = (D = 0) 000 000060 bbbbbb REEE 000aC) EEGEEE C � EU / U k7 / \ $ Oro . � k - cm � 0 -4 �wko04kw w Ch . 0 S q & oo % . CA) CA) k . § w � t � � � � q E 40) o4N D 2 % a % 0 0k kE \ k \ \ 7 \ Urban Courtly of San Luis Obispo 2DD6 Draft Funding Reeommondadore' The 2006 Draft f®dirra Reeenmmadafflbns we t a In 2005 grind hind A&JXHI.. n ' n a0oeelieo aamurd..HUD has act a®mmead the 2,_ .tffleamn!a0eeaaah figures, thus Owfending amomm are suldeatte dhmgs. . City of Arroyo Grande Applicant Project Request 'Draft Funding Public Services Emrwmic Opportunity Comm Forty Wonderful Program 2,200 1,162 Ecmnamlo Opportunity Comm. Senior Health Screening 4,500 3,219 Big Brothers Big Sisters Youth Mentoring Program 5,500 2,061 The Literacy Cound Literacy Program 3,000 1,661 The Harvest Bag,Inc. Food Distribution Program 6,000 6,087 Senior Volunteer Services Caring Canes Program 2,000 1,368 South County Youth Coalition 5DO .500 South County SAFE 1,000 500 Community OourseMg Center 3,500 1,530 Total 28,200 18,088 Public Facilities City of Arroyo Grande Strother and Elm Street Parks ADA work 38,169 43,440 City of Arroyo Grande Fagade Grant 15,000 17,630 Total 63,169 61,070 Coda Enforcement City of Arroyo Grande Code Enforcement 15,630 11.311 Total 16,630 11,311 Economic Development Cuesta College SEDC Small Business Development Center 5,000 5,000 Total 5,000 5,000 Planning and Building HOTLINE of SLO County HOTLINE 2-1-1 Planning Grant 1,000 1,000 Total 1,000 1,000 Administration CRY of Arroyo Grande Administration 24,525 24,117 Total 120,686 City of Ataseadere Public Services Eoowmlo Opportunity Comm Setter Health Screening 2,500 0 EconaNc Opportunity Comm Forty Wonderful Program 2,500 0 E=Xff a Opportunity Gomm Teen Academic Parenting Program 2,000 0 Court Appointed Special Adv= Support Servkss for At-Risk Youth 2,000 0 Big Brothers Big Sistes Youth Mento"Program 7,800 ' 0 The Literacy Council Literacy Program 3,000 0 EI Cmnino Homeless.Org. Homeless shatter 13,600 10,500 Herter Volunteer Services Coring Callers-outreach to elderly persons 1,500 1,000 La Clinics de Tolosa Dental rare 3,ODD 0 Loaves and Fishes Purchase groceries 7,500 7,500 Community Link BHinguel Ralson 2,06D 1,500 Ataseadero Cmty Services Fndtn Youth Activity Scholarships 10,ODD 9,200 Total 67,400 29,700 Public Facilities Atascadem Leaves&Fishes install new air conditioner 7,040 0 Nod County Women's Stetter Now.FlooMg 2,200 0 Esareia dot File Training%cMy-dev metaly disabled 50,000 25,000 City of Atascadem Pedestrian Safety Street Light Project 50,000 0 . Ghity of Atasradero Fagade Imporvemerd Program SO.= 0 . City of Atescedgro PedestrianIADA Improvements 100,000 82,5DO . Total 269,240 107,600 Code Enfoosmerd. City of Atascadero Code Enforcement 50,000 33.600 Total 60.000 33,600 Economic Development Cuesta College SBOC Small Business Development Center 5,000 0 Total 6,090 0 Planning and Capacity Building 'HOTLINE of SLO County HOTLINE 2-1-1 Planning Grant 1,000 Total 1,000 0 Administration- City of Atascadeo AdMnbtratioh 45,138 27,209 Total 198,009 The City of Atasaadoro proposes to reallocate prior year funds as follows: Year From Existing Activity To New Activity Funding Amount 1996 Eccxxx. Dew.Capably BtAding Code Enforcement 16400 1998 Youth Carder Renovation PedestrieNAOA Improvements 5741 1999 Youth Center Renovation PedesMaNADA improvements 1759 2003 Fegede Program Pedestrian Street Light Project 56000 Total Proposed Reallocation 73800 City of Grover Beach Applicant Proj Request Draft' In Public Services \� � Economic Opportunity Comm. Senior Health Screening 4,500 1��SSS BIT B Economic Opportunity Comm. Forty Wonderful Program 3,ODD 0 Economic Opportunity Comm Tear Academie Parenting Program 2,800 0 Economic Opportunity Comm. South County Health Clinic 8,156 0 Community Counseling Center Counse ingiltherapy program 3,500 0 Big Brothers Big Sisters Youth Mentoring Program 6,500 0 The Literary Courncd Literacy Program 3,DDO D The Harvest Bag,Inc. Food Distribution Program 5,000 0 South County Youth Coalition At-risk youth scholarships SDO 0 Senior Volunteer Services Caring Ceders Program 2,ODO 0 SAFE Collaborative Food and Sheter program 1,000 0 Exploration Station Youth Adivities 10,000 0 Total 49,866 0 Public Facilities City of Grover Beach Menton Ave.Flood Improvement Projed 140,356 140,356 Total 140,356 140,366 Economio Development Cuesta College SBDC Small Business Development Center 5,000 0 Total 6,000 0 Planning and Capacity Building HOTLINE of SLO County HOTLINE 2-1-1 Planning Grant 1,000 0 Total 1,000 0 Total 140,356 City of Paso Robles Housing Homeless Housing Project Rest/Recovery Center 166,666 0 Total 0 Public Services Economic Opportunity Comm. Senior Health Screening 3,500 0 Economic Opportunity Comm. Forty Wonderful Program 2,200 0 Economic Opportunity Comm. Teen Academic Parenting Program 2,500 0 Homeless Housing Project Motel Voudner Program 8,ODD 0 Big Brothers Big Sisters Youth Mentoring Program 7,500 0 The Uteraey Council Literary Program 3,000 0 Senior Volunteer Services Caring Callers-outreach to elderly persons 3,500 0 Paso Robles Youth Art Fndtn. Art classes 20,000 0 The Harvest Bag,Inc. Food Distitbuton Program 1,000 0 Unspecified allocation of Paso Robles public services funds 0 67,194 Told 61200 67,194 Public Facilities City of Paso Robles Downtown newsrack enclosures 50,000 0 City of Paso Robles Seismic Mitigation Program 87,000 87,000 City of Paso Robles LED-Ughted Crosswalk 40,000 0 City of Paso Robles Municipal Pool Changing Rm Rehab.II 221,000 163,676 Paso Robles Main Street Assoc. install six ornamental street light fixtures 94,000 0 Estrella Warbird Museum ADA work 110,400 0 Total 602,400 260,676 Economic Development Cuesta College SBDC Small Business Development Center 5,DDO 0 Total 6,000 0 Planning and Capacity Building HOTLINE of SLO County HOTLINE 2-1-1 Planning Grant 1,000 0 Total 1,000 0 Administration City of Paso Robles Administration 76,000 76,000 Total 385,870 "Includes 564,800 In program Income and$2,680 in reprogrammed 2005 CDBG funds from the LED -Ughted Crosswalk Project i zo Pty of San Wfa Obispo I� Public Services Economic Opportunity Comm. Prado Day Center 50,000 0 Economic Opportunity Comm. Merdne Lewis Memorial Shelter 138,000 100,200 Big Brothers Big Sisters Youth Mentoring Program 8,000 0 The Harvest Bag,Inc Food Distribution Program 4,000 0 Total 200,000 100,200 Public FacillUas Economic Opportunity Comm Prado Day Center Improvements 35,000 50,OD0 City of San Luis Obispo Historic Adobe Rehabifitellon 50,OOD 110,200 City of San Luis Obispo ADA Street Improvements 150,000 151,400 City of San Luis Obispo ADA Corrections to City Facilities 122,600 122,600 Total 367,600 434,200 Economic Development Cuesta College SBDC Small Business Development Center 1010DD 0 Total 10, 000 0 Planning and Capacity Building HOTUNE of SLO County HOTLINE 2-1-1 Planning Grant 2,0DD 8600 Total 2,000 8,600 Administration City of San Luis Obispo Administration 125,DD0 125,000 Total 668,000