Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/18/2006, PH 3 - REVIEW OF THE 2005 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT AND CONSIDERATION OF A REVISION TO THE RESIDENTIAL GR council M .a•y �s' o� accnaa nepout C it it O F SAN L U I S O B JS P O FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Dire or Prepared By: Michael Codron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE 2005 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT AND CONSIDERATION OF A REVISION TO THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE PHASING SCHEDULE. CAO RECOMMENDATION As recommended by the Planning Commission: 1) Accept the 2005 General Plan Annual Report. 2) Adopt a resolution revising the phasing schedule for the Residential Growth Management Ordinance. 3) Consider the Planning Commission request to change the intervals used in the Residential Growth Management Ordinance phasing schedule from 3 years to 8 years and provide staff with direction. DISCUSSION Purpose of the General Plan Annual Report Each year, the City publishes an Annual Report on the status of its General Plan and actions taken to implement it during the past year(Attachment 1). This report is provided to help citizens and City officials gauge progress towards achieving the goals listed in the General Plan. The annual report is done in part to comply with State law, which says that "the planning agency shall ... provide an annual report to the legislative body on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation, including the progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs..." (California Government Code Section 65400). The General Plan Annual Report is an opportunity for the"City to keep the General Plan current by reflecting on how well the Plan continues to meet the City's goals and objectives. It is an opportunity to review the changes that have been made during the preceding year and consider if those changes are caused by an underlying inadequacy in the Plan. It is also an opportunity to review how well the Plan's programs are being implemented and determine if the programs are still relevant or if priorities should be reassigned. This latter objective is also addressed every two years when the City Council develops a new financial plan. During the budgeting process, the City Council reviews the progress being made to implement the General Plan and decides whether or not to make particular implementation programs a major city goal for the next two years. Council Agenda Report 2005 Annual Report on the General Plan Page 2 Key Implementation Issues The Annual Report is organized around key implementation issues. These include Development and Population, Growth Management, Open Space Protection, Historic Preservation, Annexations, Major Implementation Plans, Circulation, Safety, Neighborhood Quality, Parks and Recreation, Sub-Area Planning and Development and Program Status. The following issues highlight the 2005 Annual Report: • The Airport Area Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council. a The McBride Annexation was processed, creating space in the City's Auto Park for new dealerships for the first time in several years. • The annual residential building growth rate was .29%, an historically low rate. However, the 36-month average for the period ending in 2005 was still-91%. u Non-residential development proceeded at an above average pace in 2005, with over 347,000 square feet of new floor area developed, primarily driven by Costco, Court Street, and the County Government Center. • The Four Creeks Rezoning Project was approved, allowing for development of 275 dwellings on land that was formerly designated Services and Manufacturing. • The Foothill Bridge Replacement Project was completed. Permits were requested for seismic retrofit work for every building left on the City's URM Inventory. • The Damon-Garcia Sports Fields were opened and officially dedicated. • Approximately 300 acres of open space land were dedicated to the City or placed in conservation easements, including 180 acres between Reservoir Canyon and the Bowden Ranch subdivision, and 96 acres along both sides of Foothill Boulevard between Los Osos Valley Road and O'Connor Way. Planning Commission Review Non-residential and Residential Growth Management Discussion On March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft 2005 General Plan Annual Report, and forwarded it to the Council (Attachment 1). The Planning Commission's discussion focused on non-residential and residential growth management. There was discussion about the difference between the rate of non-residential development and the rate of residential development. For instance, the average growth of non-residential floor area over the five year period from 2001-2005 is 2.09 percent (Source: 2005 General Plan Annual Report, Table 3-B). The average residential growth of the number of dwellings over the same period was .90 percent (Source: Building Division data on final inspections of new dwellings and demolitions of dwellings). 3 - �- L. Council Agenda Report 2,005 Annual Report on the General Plan Page 3 The following table illustrates this data: Total Number of New Dwellings(Net Demolitions) Year New Units Total Dwellings Annual Growth 2001 105 19,603 0.54% 2002 94 19,697 0.48% 2003 224 19,921 1.14% 2004 370 20,291 1.86% 2005 100 20,391 0.49% Annual Average 0.90% Total New Commercial Floor Area(Net Demolitions) Year New Floor Area Total Floor Area Annual Growth 2001 255,060 9,521,103 2.60% 2002 59,537 9,580,640 0.60% 2003 196,180 9,776,820 1.95% 2004 195,877 9,972,697 1.91% 2005 347,863 10,320,560 3.28% Annual Average 2.09% According to the California Employment Development Department there were 25,400 jobs in the City of San Luis Obispo at the end of 2005. Using the data above, this equates to approximately 1 job per 400 square feet of non-residential floor area on average. Data from the 2000 Census indicates there were 1.44 employees per household in the City of San Luis Obispo. Therefore, the City of San Luis Obispo would have to create approximately 1 new dwelling unit for every 576 square feet of non-residential floor area if it was City policy to maintain a 1-to-1 balance between jobs and dwelling units. Consistent with General Plan policy, San Luis Obispo has been building one dwelling unit per 1,180 square feet of new non-residential floor area over the past five years. The Land Use Element EIR predicted a gap between new employees and new dwelling units. This is inherent in the land use plan adopted in 1994. The EIR identified this condition as a significant and unavoidable impact because of additional commuting and associated impacts that would likely result. The Council accepted this impact and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in recognition of other goals for "maintaining San Luis Obispo's fiscal health and hub role,. and avoiding further expansion of residential development into open space areas" (Council Resolution No. 8332, 1994 Series). Decreasing Household Size One important trend that could not be predicted in the Land Use Element EIR is the change in household composition that the City is currently experiencing. Land Use Element Table 2, Anticipated City Population Growth, predicts a constant household size of 2.35 people per dwelling through 2022. In 2005, there were 2.18 residents per dwelling. With the drop in average household size, the number of employees per household discussed above may have also dropped, or the drop in household size may be attributed to younger, pre-employment family members. For instance, an increase in DINKs (double income no kids) would tend to increase the average number of employees per household. Council Agenda Report 2005 Annual Report on the General Plan Page 4 While it is not clear how the "employee per household" figure is changing in San Luis Obispo, it is clear that the City is experiencing - on a local level - the worldwide trend of decreasing household size. Based on a 2003 study published in the journal Nature, Stanford University ecologist Gretchen C. Daily concludes that "the (worldwide) housing boom is largely being driven by a global trend toward smaller households. Throughout the world, the average number of people living together in a household is shrinking - primarily because of lower fertility rates, higher divorce rates, higher per capita income, aging populations and a decline in multi-generational family units." The Nature study shows that fewer people per household leads to higher per-capita consumption of water, land, fuel and other natural resources, even when population declines. In addition, fewer children and an older population can change the character of neighborhoods and the need for services, as evidenced by the closure of some schools, changing recreation facilities, and increased demand for emergency medical services. What can the City do to Respond to Different Growth Rates Between Jobs and Housing? There are several ways the City can affect the different rates if the Council determines that a change is warranted. For example, the City can enable increased housing production or reduce the potential for new non-residential floor area. In 2001 and 2002, the Council considered this issue, and declined to set specific limits on the pace of non- residential development. The Planning Commission, during its discussion on March 8, 2006, also opposed the concept of non-residential growth limits because their concerns were a lack of residential zoning and the potential for the City to become a bedroom community because of a lack of jobs and affordable housing. Instead of placing limits on non-residential growth, the City has aggressively pursued policies to increase the number of total potential dwelling units in the City. Even though the 1994 General Plan allows for a residential growth rate of 1% over a three-year period, in practice this limit has never been reached. The adoption and certification of a new Housing Element in 2004 and more aggressive pursuit of new affordable housing were major steps towards identifying and facilitating increased residential development. For example, Housing Element Policy 6.3.7 identifies large, underutilized properties for potential change from commercial to residential zoning, which can change the net ratio in favor of housing. The Four Creeks project accommodates 275 dwelling units on one of these identified sites, which was previously designated Services and Manufacturing. As high density residential housing, the project utilizes less land per dwelling unit and is likely to be more affordable than single-family detached houses. Planning applications have been submitted to rezone two other large infill sites identified in the Housing Element for housing, which will be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2006. In 2003, the City approved a new mixed-use ordinance that allows for residential development of up to 24 units per acre. in combination with commercial projects in areas designated Services and Manufacturing. Completed and planned mixed- use projects in these areas include Broad Street Mixed-Use, 3592 Broad Street (86 dwellings), Cinderella Carpets, 3510 Broad Street (4 dwellings), Sycamore Plaza, 3592 Sacramento Drive (12 dwellings), the Roadhouse (24 dwellings) and Parker Plaza, 2146 Parker Street (20 dwellings). The City has also adopted a no-net loss housing ordinance 3 -y Council Agenda Report 2005 Annual Report on the General Plan Page 5_ for the Downtown area. Residential Growth Management Phasing Schedule The Residential Growth Management Ordinance allocates building permits to the major expansion areas in three-year intervals(Attachment 3). This implements General Plan policies to assimilate new residents gradually — as resources permit, and to build out new residential areas one at a time to avoid long periods of construction in new neighborhoods. The 2005 General.Plan Annual Report includes a Growth Management Phasing Schedule, which is recommended for approval by resolution (Attachment 4). A revised phasing schedule is necessary at this time because of several reasons discussed in the Annual Report, including changed capacities in the Orcutt Area and Margarita Area and an increase in the assumed amount of in-city development. After a discussion of these issues, the Planning Commission approved the General Plan Annual Report by consensus. The Commission then approved a follow-up motion to recommend that the Council consider lengthening the intervals in the phasing schedule of the Residential Growth Management Ordinance from three years to eight years. The purpose of this change would be for the phasing schedule to better reflect the economic cycle of housing development and not constrain market forces. The change could have the effect of allowing more residential development to occur in the City's expansion areas within any given year, while maintaining the 1% average growth rate for dwellings when measured over the eight-year period and entire General Plan horizon. The eight-year interval could reduce the potential that housing production would be artificially constrained by the imposition of the shorter three-year interval, however, more analysis of this issue is needed before such a conclusion can be made. The Land Use Element (LUE) policies that guide growth rates and phasing in the City are attached for Council's consideration (Attachment 5). The proposal to change the length of the phasing interval would require an amendment to LUE policy 1.11.2, which establishes the current 36-month interval. Any such amendment would require later public hearings at the Planning Commission and Council. The interval change proposed by the Planning Commission would allow for more housing in the Margarita Area to be completed before major production begins in the Orcutt Area. FISCAL IMPACTS When the General Plan was prepared it was accompanied by a fiscal impact analysis, which found that the General Plan was fiscally balanced. The annual report does not change the General Plan. Accordingly, the Annual Report on the General Plan has a neutral fiscal impact. CONCURRENCES The Community Development Department prepares the Annual Report on the General Plan with significant input from other City departments. The Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Utilities, Police, Fire, Finance, and Administration departments provided information for this report. Council Agenda Report 2005 Annual Report on the General Plan Page 6 ALTERNATIVES 1. The Council may direct staff to make changes to the 2005 General Plan Annual Report. 2. The Council may continue discussion if additional information is needed. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: 2005 General Plan Annual Report Attachment 2: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, 3-8-06 Attachment 3: Residential Growth Management Ordinance (and current phasing schedule) Attachment 4: Resolution Approving the Revised Phasing Schedule Attachment 5: Land Use Element Excerpts LAGP Arrival Report\CAR(2005).dm _ K A;tahment 1 y I� city of san Luis oBispo 2005 annual izepoRt on the Geneizal plan ' � ` f . The Airport Area Specific Plan was adopted in 2005. y�•4 P �yrA�r t�'sj"T¢T` fY i feyt •,.eG ti i� 34L }�`Et.„.'•a 4,t� l »i%✓'.+FSta�`'V.-^'' �• r �.���� ;j �� r� '!� ..\ Fes` Lw5 [,yx � ai.'.�y�'n A.'_4„� � K � j so�riW Bwntlary `'�,,' V\ iu sl- 3x \ eye J The Court Street Project was completed and occupied in 2005. e '.E •t Qq�?AV'? Attalohmant 1 This report was prepared by the Community Development Department, for review by the Planning Commission and acceptance by the City Council. The Community Development Department's Long-range Planning Division often takes the lead for staff work involving the General Plan. However, all City departments and commissions are involved in General Plan issues, contributing to the plan's implementation and this report. City of San Luis Obispo . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Our Mission Statement Our mission is to serve all persons in a positive and courteous manner and help ensure that San Luis Obispo continues to be a healthy, safe, attractive, and enjoyable place to live, work, or visit. We help plan the.City's form and character, support community values, preserve the . environment, promote wise use of resources, and protect public health and safety. Our Service Philosophy The City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff provides high quality service when you need it. We will: • Listen to understand your needs; • Give clear, accurate and prompt answers to your questions; • Explain how you can achieve your goals under the City's rules; • Help resolve problems in an open, objective manner; • Maintain high ethical standards; and • Work to improve our service. Report reviewed by the Planning Commission March 8, 2006, and accepted by the City Council . 2006. 3 -� city of san lues oBispo cenEua Ian annual uepoat soon Atta-.nment 1 Report at a Glance Introduction Page 5 The General Plan is a comprehensive statement of the City's goals and how those goals will be achieved over the long-run. Administration of the General Plan General Plan Status Element Updates Page 6 In 2005, significant progress was made towards the adoption of a new Conservation and Open Space Element. Amendments Page 6 The City approved two text amendments and five map amendments in 2005. Implementation of the General Plan Development & Population Housing& Residents Page 8 According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of San Luis Obispo was 44,519 residents on January 1, 2005, representing a growth of.8%. Quantified Objectives and Affordable Housing Page 8 The City's Affordable Housing Program for 2005 included a successful grant application for $300,000 in down payment assistance for 10 affordable homes in the Tumbling Waters project. Commercial Development & Daytime Population Page 11 In 2005; commercial development proceeded at a high pace in comparison to previous years. Growth Management Residential Growth Management Page 13 Annual increases in the number of dwellings have averaged .91% over the past three years. For 2005, the total number of dwellings increased by .29%. Commercial and Industrial Growth Management Page 15 The cumulative growth in commercial floor area over the past five years is 11.38%. Open Space Protection Page 15 The City continued its efforts to protect open space and the natural environment in 2005. Historic Preservation Page 15 In 2005, one property was upgraded from the Contributing List to the Master List of Historical Resources. Annexations Page 16 Annexation of the McBride property was concluded in 2005., pdC4E t 3 9 city of San LUIS OBISPO ceneua.�an annual REPORt 2005 Attachment 1 Major Implementation Plans Margarita Area Specific Plan Page 16 In 2005, the City began work on three major subdivisions in the western_ portion of the Margarita Area. Airport Area Specific Plan Page 16 The Airport Area Specific Plan was adopted in August, 2005. Orcutt_ Area Specific Plan. Page 16 Work continued on the environmental studies for the OASP in 2005. Water Supply Page 17 As of 2005, there are 130 acre feet of water available to serve new annexation areas, and 130 acre feet is reserved for infill and intensification projects. Circulation Transportation Network Improvements Page 18 The Foothill Bridge Replacement Project was completed in 2005. Transportation_Planning Improvements Page 19 The City continued to work with Caltrans to complete a Federal environmental clearance for the Mid-Higuera Widening Project. Neighborhood Traffic Managment Page 20 Eight neighborhoods actively pursued the preparation of Neighborhood Traffic Management (NTM) Plans for their neighborhoods. Access and Parking Management Page 21 In an effort to provide additional vehicle parking downtown for employees and customers, the City began preliminary investigations for the development of a parking structure that would replace the existing public parking lot at the comer of Palm and Nipomo Streets. Safety Staff Training Page 21 The Police Department is in full-compliance with POST requirements for in- service training hours for all employees. Critical Facilities Location and Reducing Structural Hazards Page 21 During 2005, several Level B projects were started and completed. New Multi Dwelling Property Inspection Program Page 22 In 2005 the City of San Luis Obispo adopted a program to improve our annual fire and life safety inspections of apartments (with three or more units), hotels, motels, bed and breakfast facilities, hostel facilities, senior living facilities, condominiums, and sorority and fraternity houses. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 22 City Fire Department spearheaded a city-wide effort to prepare a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2005. y� PAGE 2 J —/v city of san Us owspo csneuAL plan annual Repout 2005 Atta.hmant 1 Neighborhood Quality Page 23 Code Enforcement—Community Development A significant reduction in Neighborhood Enhancement Ordinance calls to the Police Department because of proactive SNAP efforts continued in 2005. Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update Page 23 Because of the success of outreach efforts, there were only 18 ordinance violations in 2005. Fratemity and Sorority Inspection Program Page 24 The revitalized inspection program is designed to provide safety inspections for"group house" occupancies. Parks & Recreation Page 24 Dedication of the Damon-Garcia Sports Fields and the bandstand in Mitchell Park highlighted Parks and Recreation program activities in 2005. Program Status Page 25 This report includes an update of the status of all General Plan implementation programs, in spread-sheet format. For More Information Page 46 Come in, write, call, or visit the City's website to learn more about the General Plan and the City's planning activities. 0 Atta.hment 1 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 ��� city of San LUIS oaiSpo geneaa n annual aspoRt 2005 Atta:hment Introduction The General Plan is a comprehensive statement of the City's goals and how those goals will be achieved over the long-run. Policies and programs in the General Plan provide guidance to staff and decision-makers on development related issues. Policy and program statements also guide City efforts to promote a stronger community through programs ranging from Adult Sports to the Neighborhood Enhancement Ordinance. The General Plan is adopted and amended by the City Council; after considering recommendations by citizens, appointed advisory bodies, other agencies, and City staff. Each year, the City publishes an Annual Report on the status of its General Plan and provides an overview of actions taken to implement the Plan during the past year. This report is provided to help citizens and City officials gauge progress towards achieving the City's stated goals and objectives. It is also an opportunity to review how well the Plan's programs are being implemented and determine if the programs are still relevant or if priorities should be reassigned. The Annual Report fulfills the requirements of State law, and the General Plan itself, which call for an annual report. Administration of the General Plan General Plan Status State law requires each city and county to adopt a general plan that addresses seven topics, typically referred to as `elements.' Additional topics, or general plan elements, may be included. The law also requires general plans to be comprehensive, internally consistent and that they provide a long-term perspective. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research publishes the General Plan Guidelines, which includes the following general plan basics: 1) Geographic Comprehensiveness: The general plan must cover all of the territory within the jurisdictions boundaries. 2) Regionalism: The general plan must take into account regional plans for transportation, air quality and water quality, and must spell out measures needed to meet federal or state standards for the region. 3) Issue Comprehensiveness: General plans must address the jurisdiction's physical development over the long term, but because the general plan is the most comprehensive expression of the general welfare, it should also recognize social and economic concerns. 4) Internal Consistency: All of the general plan elements must be internally consistent. Each element's data, analyses, goals, policies and programs must be consistent and compliment one another. This includes consistency with area plans and specific plans. 5) Long-Term Perspective: The general plan must address the welfare of current and future generations, although the time-frames may vary among the different elements. The Housing Element, for instance, must be updated every five years. State law says the General Plan should be kept current. This is done through this annual review process, comprehensive updates, and through amendments. Updates for an element are usually undertaken at least five years apart. They look at underlying conditions and preferences. Amendments are typically smaller in scope and involve changing one part in a way that fits with paC,e 5 ��� city of San Luis oBiSpo geneu&.-,Lan annual 12epoat2005 the overall framework. Consideration of amendments is triggered by private applications or by direction from the City Council. Changes to the General Plan require hearings by the Planning Commission and by the City Council. The type of notice provided for the hearings depends on the type of proposed change, but always includes a descriptive item on the meeting agenda, which is published in the newspaper. The City's website and public access television channel provide additional information. Element Updates In 2005, the City made significant progress on its update and consolidation of the Conservation Element. The new Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) is intended to be an update of the Conservation and Energy Conservation Elements. The new Conservation Element would also consolidate all of the goals, policies and programs from the Open Space Element and the conservation related policies currently found in the Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Circulation Element into a single General Plan element.. The Planning Commission held a series of public hearings on the draft COSE in April through August of 2005. The result of these hearings was a new draft COSE, published in October, 2005. The Planning Commission continued with public hearings in November and December, 2005, and the City Council adopted the COSE in April of 2006. Table 1 - General Plan Elements Element Required or Date of Adoption or Activity in 2005 Optional Major Revision Land Use Required 1994 Amendments approved in 2005. Housing Required 2004 Circulation Required 1994 Amendment approved in 2005. Noise Required 1996 Conservation Required 1973 In 2005, significant progress was made on an update consolidating the Energy Conservation Optional 1981 Conservation,Energy Conservation Open Space Required 1994 and Open Space Elements. Safety Required 2000 Parks &Recreation Optional 2001 Water&Wastewater Optional 1996 Management Amendments In 2005, the City approved text amendments to the General Plan, as listed in Table 2. Table 2a lists the 2005 amendments to the Land Use Element Map. The most significant map amendments were those associated with the Airport Area Specific Plan, the Four Creeks Rezoning Project and the McBride Annexation. paGE 6 �� Arl"hment 1 city of san ltus OBISPO ` genEuar plan Annual REpout 2005 Table 2_- General Plan Text Amendments in 2005 Type Location or Subject_ Chane __ _. Initiated b comment_. Land Use Airport Area Specific Figure#2 changed to reflect a City;implementation of Plan revised location for the URL. AASP Figure#9 was amended to reflect the revised boundaries of the Airport Area. Circulation Airport Area Specific Amended Figure#2 of the City; implementation of Plan_ Circulation Element to reflect AASP the Ai ort Area street network. Table 2a -Land Use Element May Amendments in 2005 Location or Subject Chane _ . _ ___ Area_ _ Initiated b ;comment Airport Area Changed the map to reflect the 1,500 acres City;AASP land use designations_adopted as part of the RASP. McBride Annexation Reconfigured orientation of 22 acres Property Owner;Provides auto part to provide greater opportunity to increase open space buffer adjacent to capacity in the City's Auto Prefurno Creek and to provide Park. more highway exposure for new auto sales uses. 791, 861, 953 Orcutt Services and Manufacturing to 17 acres City and Property Owner; and 3330, 3360 Broad High Density Residential and Implements Housing (4 Creeks) Community Commercial Element Program 6.3.7.. Development plans for 275 new residential units approved concurrently. 1221'Nipomo Medium High Density 7,500 s.f. Property Owner;Zoning Residential to General Retail includes MU overlay to require mixed use development as part of future project. 499 Brizzolara Low Density Residential to 31,200 s.f. Property Owner, Design Medium Density Residential review of eight-unit project on- oin . PACE 7 3 -16 AUactiment 1 city of San Luis OBISPO geneizai. plan annual Rcpotzt 2005 Implementation of the General_Plan Development & Population Housing &Residents According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of San Luis Obispo was estimated to be 44,519 residents as of January 1, 2005, representing population growth of .8% over the previous year. Table 2 of the Land Use Element shows the anticipated City population growth to the year 2022. Table 2 predicts a population of approximately 48,740 residents for 2005, with 20,640 dwellings. Actual population for 2005 is approximately 4,221 people less, and actual dwellings are approximately 20,391, or 249 fewer than anticipated in the General Plan. It should be noted that while the difference between the projected population and actual population is 9.4%, the difference between the projected and actual number of dwellings is only 1.2%. In other words, the total number of dwellings is on par with the numbers projected in the General Plan, however, total population is significantly lower. This difference can be accounted for by a lower than anticipated average household size. Table 2 of the Land Use Element predicts an average household size of 2.35 people per dwelling unit. Over time, this average household size has dropped to today's figure of 2.18 people per dwelling unit. The projections provided in Table 2 were the basis for many other assumptions in the General Plan, such as transportation needs. Since the actual numbers are within the projections, the assumptions based on these projected numbers should be sound. Quantified Objectives and Affordable Housing State housing law requires that each jurisdiction identify the number of housing units that will be built, rehabilitated, and preserved during the Housing Element's planning period, which is January 1, 2001 to July 1, 2009. These projections are termed"quantified objectives." Chapter 2 of the Housing Element includes goals, policies and programs to accommodate affordable housing programs that meet the City's Quantified Objectives. The Housing Element also includes goals for mixed-income housing, housing variety and tenure, and special-needs housing. In 2004, the City established a Housing Program Manager staff position to focus on accomplishing these and other important General Plan goals. The following is a list of program accomplishments for 2005. Tumbling Waters (Orcutt Road) In a public-private partnership, the City was awarded Proposition 46 funds (BEGIN program) to provide $30,000 in down payment assistance to 10 home buyers, for total grant of $300;000. On November 15th, 2005, the Council agreed to match the $30,000 State grant for each of the 10 units from the City's Affordable Housing Fund. The developer is also an integral part of the program by contributing one dollar for every three the City allocates. By leveraging State, local, and private funds, 10 more affordable housing units will become part of the City's program. - �ent 1 N 'O = O T C 0 r C L O '= t3 N l- I- N M v'1 V ON Ch N j _ M N kn ON It It vn �c 60 z Q ^ G C O �D N — r- 00 M V� 't 'I o 0 " Eot � o0Mo m 4 0o ° z CL N 7 Nr- 0 !h C C �• � ;� O O O O O O O O O O O O O v v o xx > ¢ 0ornocnr, ^ 000 �o Zo � o a� E 3 fl p a7 v V O M O CN C' N v-) 7 O =Ay 8�8 ._-� 7 N " z P 42, L ON �D ^ O 00 y L O G. 00 O Q\ eF M M N O\ y C! U G G to v 6) v cS = N v 2 _ C CJ C.C 00?? O y 7 O = O O O O O M O O M O N 3 m y 2 23E o = a a� ^ O o o cc O o Q) Ems °' °o CST ,S � � � � - •o E L ° o D .. L L o y �y ¢ 00000MooMo N � y°c � amt °' o � � 3 n . c y ca a d 0 = 7 N O R 00 O "IN V1 N •C Q = N � N N p y E C � 0 p� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Fs v� .ea 0 3v � 0U a oma ¢ o 00 O N N vi N cQ ''•' = > N I N. N 7 N N 3 E c� =p N y •� y L m •� � � L .S 3 � o N � c " ooL E c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o = E o o f 0. 9 cs 3 i 0 z Z cl c m O O o r cz b y o U V o is cl CIO = = p 'v O U s L � ° � N 40 � = ca _y z M V1 O\ M C Q 00 �O 4 E N •N+ fs+ o 3 �s .° ° y •o a ° sE yw a n N N N n. O M r N .-+ . .m+ C ° ti y ti p = C W ti 00 0 3 1 1 " ._ —'- 3 yE " = ms a o M rn oe a 00 r- en E 'T 66.5 >, E E u u c IE E oz tz "0T �+ to `p ON O N M y O = w z 'N CQ Q\ c1 c� � � O O O O O O .r Q\ N N ON N N N = Er j;5 Q ' ^ ^ Zr Attachment 1 city of san Luis owspo c1 �0_ etzal plan annual uEpout 2005 People's Self-Help Housing (South Higuera Street.) 30 apartments for low and very-low income households. Project received its land use approvals and the Council will consider using $350,000 of the City's Affordable Housing Fund to help fund the project early in 2006. Margarita Area Specific Plan The Specific Plan has been approved and tentative maps are being processed for the western part of the area. Approximately 400 dwellings are planned for this portion of the Margarita Area; the Inclusionary Housing Requirement results in 50 affordable homes. In 2005, the City, Housing Authority, and developer created an affordable housing plan that could serve as a model for future annexation areas. The developers are dedicating land (2.75 acres) in two distinct locations, including completion of the associated public improvements; to the Housing Authority. Staff and the developer are now exploring ways to go beyond that minimum number. Downtown City staff is facilitating development of several new downtown housing projects. Staff is reviewing General Plan policies and Zoning regulations in preparation for a Council workshop in spring, 2006, to clarify building height and intensity standards. Cooperative Housing—Humbert Street The City helped the Housing Authority acquire this site from the UP Railroad with a$600,000 loan from the Affordable Housing Fund. City staff also assisted on the HELP application;a competitive affordable housing funding program from CalHFA. The proposed project is approximately 65 workforce housing units of a cooperative concept whereby a member owns a collective share of the project and enjoys the tax advantages of home ownership. State/Federal Grants Due to the certified Housing Element, the State 2005 Workforce Housing Reward Grant will reward the City with approximately $44,000 for approving 40 low-income housing units in 2004. The BEGIN Program ($300,000 for down payment assistance) is a public-private partnership and will leverage 10 additional affordable dwellings in the Tumbling Waters project. In September, 2005, the City made an application for CalHome funding of $500,000 for first-time home buyer assistance. The City has been awarded $231,000 for a First-Time Homebuyer Program using federal HOME program funds. The City continues to receive federal CDBG funds to benefit the low- and moderate persons of the community. CDBG funds help to operate the City's Homeless Shelter and assist in the development of affordable housing for lower income households. In total for 2005, the City was awarded $600,000 in grants funds with$750,000 in pending applications as of December 31, 2005. City Affordable Housing Fund(AHF) The AHF, established in 1999, implements the City's Inclusionary housing requirement by providing a fund for the collection of in-lieu fees. In 2005, $1,300,000 was awarded for affordable housing projects, including a total of$1 million for the Housing Authority Cooperative Housing project and the first-time homebuyer program for Tumbling Waters. C ve pace 10 Attachment 1 city of san Luis osispo 1 lizal plan annual uepoRt 2005 San Luis Obispo County Housing Trust Fund The City contributed $30,000 in 2005 from its Affordable Housing Fund to assist in the start-up operations of the Housing Trust Fund; a county-wide non-profit organization dedicated to increasing affordable housing. In September, the Housing Programs Manager was appointed as the City representative on the Housing Trust Fund Commission.. Public Outreach The City is conducting an increased and ongoing public outreach campaign, seeking more funding, and spreading the word about opportunities. The Housing Programs Manager has spoken before many community groups, including the Chamber of Commerce, Lions Club, SLO Property Owner's Association, and KKAL radio. Two brochures have been completed to encourage affordable housing efforts. Visit the Housing website: http://www.slocity.org/communitydevelopment/Housing/housing.asp. Commercial Development & Daytime Population Land Use Element Policy 1.4 says that the gap between housing demand, due to more jobs and college enrollment, and housing supply should not increase. A look at recent data suggests that the number of jobs in the City is well matched to the total number of workers living in the City. According to the 2000 Census, there were 21,684 workers who were living in the City of San Luis Obispo. Data from the California Employment Development Department indicates that 23,700 people were employed in the City during the same period. While these numbers suggest parity between the number of workers living in the City and the number of jobs, Census data also shows that only 12,901 (59.5%) of the workers who lived in the City in 2000, also worked in the City. Therefore, many jobs in the City are filled by workers who commute from other communities, and approximately 40% of San Luis Obispo workers go outside of the City to work. Is this a bad thing? Not necessarily. Many of the County's high quality jobs are situated in areas immediately adjacent to the City, including Cal Poly, Cuesta College, Diablo Canyon, and the California Men's Colony. Reducing the number of workers in the City who commute farther for work, such as to Santa Maria and Paso Robles, may be accomplished as more high quality jobs are created in the City. The 2005 adoption of the Airport Area Specific Plan and continued economic development efforts to attract major employers provide an environment that allow high quality jobs to be created, consistent with Land Use Element goals for Society and Economy. Some of these goals include: LUE Goal 9: Provide employment opportunities appropriate for area residents' desires and skills. LUE Goal 10: Retain existing businesses and agencies, and accommodate expansion of existing businesses, consistent with other goals. LUE Goal 12: Emphasize more productive use of existing commercial buildings and land areas already committed to urban development. LUE Goal 13: Provide an adequate revenue base for local government and public schools. However, implementation of the General Plan is not a matter of working towards goals in a singular fashion. The goals listed above are achieved in concert with other equally valuable General Plan goals, such as Housing Element Goal 6.1: Plan for new housing to meet the full range of community housing needs. Circulation Element goals are also a critical component for achieving the overall vision of the General Plan, including Circulation Element Goal 2: Reduce people's use of their cars by supporting PAGE 11 �9 Pala ,nment 1 40 U 4 X a u 00 -- kn 01 n O n O\ r oo O\ oo y 9 o n 0 00 0o n °� °� N o fn O 7 N O N O N O N O — — M N ^ 'C C e0 O C Q' H V 7 •� = Q. Xtu U 7 r cd n N 00 V'1 \O M — n \O T 0 0 � T e E v1 — 00 0o D: O O. .r E' 00 N 00 00 � tn � 0 't N N y E .tz E 7 Sy Z — 0 0 O U O\ N as n o0 C1 V 00 Co h 00 O\ n \O kn \O N to O\ N � O' +- ?� \D Ow vl. DD 7 \D 00 \O O\ Oq U c n to M I r n [� eF ON N CC O C. C N Z O — ' V o0 V} 1n M 00 \O ON C > G 7 0 .2 ^ ^ > u .D U U O' O U 3 r 0 O O M o 0 0 0 'n O O 00 Q Y LIS U r,- 13o wO 0 C y > R 7 'O N T N O\ \O V1 O 00 C CQ U •p CZ .0, i N GCR C O — N N y O y V O C O` 0 0 0 3 - n — M a N ON n o0 � It 00 � z °\ o O eq ell N U Oq o0 D\ col ON V'� n N V1 n N \° — y LZ G C_ ,z 'C 7 1-n M M. \O N \O 00 O\ D\ 7 ^ >. U �>.• 9N 7 n n v14 n n M O\ C O U .0O N kn O\ to V'1 t7 00 00 DD > CIO F.1 u0 N O M N CN "T O O\ 7 V to 7C-4 wl, rp' C57N Cr \D o0 n -� r. n r- VOA' r CW) N I '� .. (y O z 7 00 � ^ N06 \O M -- V1 4 O O0 o E v v oo v n rn n ao n •E _ a N Cvw y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn U o !D CC W d - 7 a — O r- CDCN at O N k O U Q .ti o�D p apL N E 0 •y 570 C ' .0.. � •L CL' N O ^ N N z O R Ln V y > V y 'C W) v1 N o0ON en �. p U n oo n — � � t+' � � M. OSSUtr� . •� C E.,D zti .v e3 O40 N O\ 7 n 00 N n N ° O U .-. .� C U M O O\ O O M 00 00 M n C\ o n E p U y o y C O 00 O O N M oo O M O O 00 y I: to V1 \O ON r- Oh N N to O. O� — O V = Z o0 O n N Lr co (0 00 � D\ O eq y C. C. R( C M .••� n n M 00 N — ao U C O [.w M y N U e3 C 0 0 0 0 00 0 \gyp O O o `. U E O 'r3 v v1 — n C U Oy .a O c 3 ° o .E E ° OCU O\ O O M 00 00 N D` p 0 .h r •fl V U O 00 O O N M w n 0 0 0 O\ p v1 iv. Ur- to o f \° 7 r- 7 V 'ZT h C _ O_ !` N o6 cr�n 00 � ON\ N \O O 00 p0\ Lv N t.^. Q O N _ ccl S M 0 0 0 0 00 cn v'i O O Cl to C y N a 0I�t0 1* IN+ \n0OM O O �c U y Z M N \O 00 T. M n \O = N C 0 Y O E y M N — — 00 Ln 7 �' c3 > E > " c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cs a°'i c •° E °id C I _ O O > '� O O O O p p '.+ cam ': N U O o N %C C C to Q _W r a h N M O V7 •C m .� '' N r`n C v N 0 0 0 0 0o v1 V1 0 0 0 W) R O : _ 7 U n V N M O O \O 0 0 N O 0> y U y C N 00 M 00 00 M O 00 C O O OO+ N cN+1 N N N T Q\ h 0 y cNC-3 . 4-DV V1 \O n 1 DO Q\ O — N M. eh kn .U+ U oo N �. U ON as O\ O\ O\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O L O\ O\ O\ O\ ON 0 0 00 0 0 E Z F• attachment 1 11 city of san Luis oBispo ` 4 nERaL plan annual RepoRt 2005 and promoting alternatives such as walking, riding buses and bicycles, and using car pools. And, Circulation Element Goal 8: Reduce the need for travel by private vehicle through land use strategies, telecommuting and compact work weeks. The General Plan does not contain goals that would encourage or restrict where City residents choose to work. Rather, the General Plan encourages diversity in housing types and promotes alternative transportation modes so that residents can make appropriate choices to suit their lifestyles. This General Plan Annual Report summarizes efforts to achieve all of the goals,policies and programs contained in the General Plan. Table 3-B summarizes nonresidential construction since 1994. In 2005, non-residential development proceeded at a high pace in comparison to previous years. Although the number of commercial projects that added floor area to the City's inventory was much lower, three significant projects resulted in a large increase in commercial floor area. These projects included Costco (140,000 s.f.), Court Street (62,000 s.f.) and the County Government Center (90,000 s.f.). Other projects that added commercial floor area in 2005 include Cole Motors on Broad Street, the Kennedy Fitness Center's clubhouse on Tank Farm Road, and two retail buildings at the Village Marketplace on the comer of Broad Street and Orcutt Road. In 2006, commercial development is expected to continue at an average pace. The largest single project is expected to be a new Marriot hotel on Calle Joaquin. Other potential projects include new retail floor area along Froom Ranch Road, offices at the coiner of Broad Street and Tank Farm Road and two mixed-use projects along the Broad Street corridor, including Cinderella Carpets and Broad Street Mixed-Use. Total floor area for 2006 is expected to be between 150,000 and 200,000 square feet, depending on progress at Froom Ranch. Growth Management Residential Growth Management In 2005, the single-year growth rate was .29%, the lowest rate since 1999. As shown in Table 3-a, annual increases in the number of dwellings have averaged .91 percent over the past three years. Residential growth management policies are implemented by the Residential Growth Management . Regulations, SLOMC 17.88. The regulations provide for phased housing construction in large annexation areas, such as the Margarita Area and the Orcutt Area. The proposed phasing schedule, Table 4, is recommended pursuant to Land Use Element Policy 1.11.3, which states the City's preference to complete one neighborhood before beginning another, although some overlap is permitted. The purpose of phasing development is to insure that residential growth rates are consistent with the City's policy of 1% growth, established by Land Use Element Policy 1.11.2. The City Council will need to consider amendments to the Residential Growth Management Phasing Schedule during 2006 to reflect the following conditions: • changed residential capacities in the Orcutt Area and Margarita Area; revisions to the Housing Element in response to State mandates for the region, which increase the amount of infill development anticipated. During the past three-year cycle, assumed in-city development of 100 units was close to the actual number of dwellings constructed. However, in future phases, the estimate of 100 units for in-city development will be too low. With significant residential development proposed or approved along the Broad Street corridor, staff estimates that in-city construction would be 350 dwelling units during the 2005-2007 phase. The recommended Growth Management Phasing Schedule is provided in Table 4 on the following page. pace 13 AttCA achment _1 0 0 N i� 47 p N Lf)v 0 0 0 C7 O co Ln r LO O v ccr)_ 0 N r 0 000 Nr N 0 Ct N r r Cf O 3 O ~ N of O 000000t0 LO 0 N 0 N 1 r O C it p rA i p o J tC N g = 0 0 0 0 0 0 O - N LO = O a N CO 6 -m 'y C r E too m p fl0 Xmva `mLD N m cm c a v C `oCDLLo -T co cm r 0) �' o EEo 6� T3 r r c7 r Ln CJ ca co C 2 c o c 0 O N o i o E r c CD 0000000 O w v � r >, E L 0 LA m a � V) co T to O O N O m a o y NCO) ccr a` 0 -0Eof 20 ,00 o c 3N = :E80c E a p u) OO000coU) co O m c •- > CA � OK � I�. cO O O c E oma f0 6 T r r C* cD r .0 0 U) L -O 00 Co= d O C o co 0 L L.« V � � N � fc :5(a E S a a znCDL00000wtn rl m � mv-CCC = = N aiE9ot6o� Nr 0 'v E c 3 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ro m v U H x 0 T3 — L9 c=C O T CO ti r N V G m.— N O o m LO y E a� a E c Si O m (D C 0 c N N p 0000CO) 00LO co 3 LO c = - (D 0 6. r �' N T VcoO' O m = 0 m r o ; E (D o o v m N 0 c •6 ca a3i E -�° o) Z y c a c y t 00) > v �.•° 'o 0 io 3 M E coN O c o m m 5 � Cr t 0 C _ 0 Q. m 0 m i p C) '0 m 47 LL a c Z0 x zn aa'i � 0c �co Q c 0 - to M) c O L o m a a m CD U c _ U m c 0 0 O r Co c0 " L o a c = ,o o - a L `m � ° cc u 8 m 7 m 7 E 3 a N m Los co o as o °��' 'a c0 = _ 0m 0 c c y E � 00 J 'O co 0) ca N R f6 N M 'C m m a O O a m m m !3 � a-2 .0 c0i 'n E E d d d d d f3 CA .0 (0 .20 m LC m m y 3333333 = 3t0 3 o co N 0 0 0 0 0 y m O F — w Q, D Q V Co 0) W Co OS M LO 0) U ca J ✓ Httamment 1 city of San Luis oBispo c,mLl plan annual RCPORt 2005 Commercial and Industrial Growth Management The General Plan contains policies on the pace of nonresidential development and its relationship to housing growth, but there are no direct limits on the rate of nonresidential construction. Policy LU 1.11.4 says the City will consider setting nonresidential construction limits if the amount of nonresidential floor area increases faster than five percent over any five year period. That threshold has been exceeded for each period ending in the last seven years (Table 3-B). The table shows that the five year cumulative growth rate for the period ending in 2005 is 11.38%. In 2001 and 2002 the City Council considered this issue, but rejected setting specific limits on the pace of nonresidential development. If any limits are established, Policy LU 1.11.4 says they would not apply to changes in existing businesses, additional non-residential floor area in the Downtown core, public agency offices, or manufacturing, light industrial or research businesses. Open Space Protection The General Plan contains many goals, policies and programs focused on.open space protection. The policies apply to sensitive lands within the City's urban reserve as well as land in the greenbelt area that is protected for its biological, agricultural, aesthetic and/or recreational value. The Land Use Element, Open Space Element, and Conservation Element address this subject in detail. In 2005, the City did the following in support of the open space program: • Received an offer of donation of a 180 acre open space property lying between the City and Reservoir Canyon from Bowden Ranch LP; • Received a 13 acre dedication of prime agricultural land at Calle Joaquin in conjunction with development approvals of a project at that location; • Received a 66 acre and a 30 acre dedication of conservation easement on either side of Foothill Blvd. between Los Osos Valley Road and O'Connor Way from the Congregation Beth David and Madonna Enterprises, respectively; • Participated in preparing the Specific Plans for the Margarita Area, Airport Area, and Orcutt Area, all of which have significant open space and resource conservation components to them; • Completed the Conservation Plan for the Cerro San Luis Natural Reserve and began its implementation; • Undertook the mitigation maintenance and monitoring project for the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex site's two creeks; • Continued to undertake improvements to the Bob Jones Bikeway along San Luis Obispo Creek between Prado Road and Los Osos Valley Road. Historic Preservation In 2005, one new building was added to the Master List of Historical Resources, on 1306 Mill Street. This property was also approved for participation in the Mills Act program. The Mills Act program furthers City goals for the preservation of historical resources by providing property tax relief to property owners who agree to use those savings to maintain and preserve their historic building. 3� pace 15 Mttd'�tlrlidni 1 city of San Luis OBlspo t ge,retzal plan annual RepoRt 2005 Annexations Annexations expand the area over which a city has land-use authority, which is a fundamental way to implement the General Plan. Annexations can also increase development potential, open space protection, tax revenues, space for public facilities, as well as service demands and costs. In general, annexations require approval by the property owner(s), the City, the County, and a separate countywide body called the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). During 2005, annexation of the McBride property was completed. This property is located within the Auto Park, as designated by Figure 3 in the Land Use Element. In 2000, City staff prepared an auto dealership location study to evaluate properties that would be suitable for development of new or expanded auto sales uses. The McBride property was listed as the top site in that study. Major Implementation Plans The General Plan requires approval of specific plans as a precursor to development of the City's major expansion areas. Specific plans typically contain more detailed land-use and design standards than the General Plan, and address the timing and financing of public facilities. They can supersede the Zoning Regulations, or lead to changes in them. The process for adopting a specific plan is similar to the process for adopting or amending a section of the General Plan. Margarita.Area.Specific Plan The Margarita Area Specific Plan was approved on October 12, 2004. In 2005, a significant amount of staff time was spent processing applications for the first three subdivisions proposed by owners in the western portion of the specific plan area. These subdivisions would provide for new residential neighborhoods and include a total of over 400 dwelling units. If the subdivisions are approved by the City Council in 2006, construction of required public improvements and possible some dwelling units would be expected to begin in 2007. Airport Area Specific Plan The Airport Area Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council in August, 2005. During their review of the plan, the Council elected to approve an alternative land use plan that extended the airport area's boundary south to Buckley Road and to land east of the airport. The changes added approximately 500 acres into the specific plan, including the Avila Ranch property, the Senn/Glick property and the MorabitoBurke property. Each of these sites is designated Industrial in the County's SLO Area Plan. The decision by the Council to expand the airport area provides an opportunity for the City to insure that all urban development in this area occurs within the City, which is best suited to provide urban services. Development of these properties within the City would also provide for higher quality design and more efficient use of land because on-site septic and fire suppression.facilities such as water tanks would not be required. At this time, the City's Urban Reserve Line (URL) matches the County's Urban Services Line, so that there is no County land designated for commercial or industrial development south of the City's URL. The first annexation of land in the Airport Area is expected to occur in 2006. Orcutt Area The draft Orcutt Area Specific Plan covers over 200 acres of land in the southeastern part of the urban area. Almost half the area would be open space or parks. The rest would accommodate up to 1000 dwellings of various types. During 2005, work continued on the environmental studies for the project and revisions were made to the specific plan to incorporates the requirements from the environmental review process into the policies and standards contained in the specific plan. The plan is also being revised to expand the potential for mixed use development along the primary collector street within the pace 16 Attachment 1 city of san lids OBISPO Cie% ,aal plan annual.uEpout 2005 plan area. Other issues addressed in revisions to the draft specific plan include airport compatibility biological mitigation areas and provisions for affordable housing. Public hearings on the draft specific plan are expected to begin in 2006. Water Supply The policies in the Water Management Element of the General Plan determine the water available for new development. Section 8.2.A. states "The City will make available to new development only that amount of safe annual yield which exceeds present water use (policy 3.4)." Policy 3.4 and related policies define present water use as the current population times the adopted per capita water use rate (145 gallons per capita per day). Based on these policies, the table below indicates the water available to allocate to new development in 2005. Year Population Present Water Demand Safe Annual Water Available @ 145 cd Yield' for Allocation 2005 44,519 1 7,230 af. 7,490 af. 260 a.f. I From Water Management Element,Table 1: includes reductions due to siltation to date Per Water Management Element Policy 8.1.3, one-half of the water available for allocation will be reserved to serve intensification and infill development within city limits. Therefore, as of 2005, 130 acre feet is available to serve new annexation areas and 130 acre feet is reserved for infill and intensification projects. The table below shows the water that has been allocated to residential and non-residential development since 1995. Water for Development(acre feet) Year Residential Non-Residential Total 1995 16.89 12.02 28.91 1996 24.54 5.83 30.37 1997 39.96 16.94 56.90 1998 41.40 8.32 49.72 1999 1 16.26 17.42 33.68 2000 25.08 1.73 26.81 2001 29.10 20.52 49.62 2002 25.02 1.08 26.10 2003 57,87 14.59 72.46 2004 76.70 14.28 90.98 Total F 352.82 112.73 465.55 Based on the General Plan build-out population of 56,000 and the per capita water use rate of 145 gpcd, the projected demand at full build-out is 9,096 acre feet per year (afy). The following table shows the primary water supply requirements based on the adopted policies to meet General Plan build-out.. PNCjE 17 -�-� Atta hment 1 city of san tuts owspo ceneRal plan annual uepout 2005 Primary Supply Requirements(acre feet) Safe Annual Yield Required at Build-out 9,096 Current Safe Annual Yield(2005) 7,490 Additional Safe Annual Yield Required 1,606 Siltation(2005 to 2025) 200 Total Water Su ly Requirement 1,806 The City is currently pursuing or considering several supplemental water supply projects. Water from the Water Reuse Project is.expected to come on-line in spring 2006 and will initially provide 130 acre- feet of water for irrigation of several parks, sports fields, and other landscaped areas. Ultimately, the City will produce approximately 1,000 acre-feet of water per year that could be used for irrigation throughout the City. Other water supply.projects that the City is pursuing or considering include the Nacimiento Pipeline Project, increased water conservation strategies, additional groundwater resources, potential desalination facility, and the Salinas Reservoir Expansion Project. Implementation of additional water supply projects to increase our current supply by at least 1,806 acre feet per year is necessary to meet projected demand at General.Plan build-out. Circulation Transportation Network Improvements In 2005, the following improvements were made to the City's transportation network, consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan Vehicular • The.Foothill Bridge reconstruction project which began in 2002 was completed and the roadway reopened to through traffic in the Summer of 2005. • As part of the City's pavement management program, neighborhoods north of Highway 101 and east of Santa Rosa Street were slurry sealed or repaved. Additionally, significant pavement work was completed on Madonna Road, Stanford Drive, Princeton Place, Murray Avenue, and Lemon Street. The City also completed a joint Pavement Pathing Project on Broad Street (Hwy 227) with Caltrans. • Tank Farm Road in the vicinity of Long Street was widened to accommodate two lanes of traffic in each direction. • Garcia Drive was extended to provide a vehicle connection with Los Osos Valley Road at Froom Ranch Way. Additionally, the traffic signal at the intersection was upgraded to accommodate this additional "leg" of traffic. • Construction of the realignment of Calle Joaquin south of Los Osos Valley Road began as a condition of private development. • To mitigate collision patterns, the intersection of Buena Vista and Garfield was realigned using signing, striping and temporary delineation. • Sight distance at four intersections was improved by either removing parking or trimming vegetation. 47 _ar / pdc4E 18 c8 city of san Luis oBispo e,EnEual plan annual Rspout 2005 • Signage and striping improvements were made to nine intersections. • As an interim measure prior to future signalization, a stop sign was installed on the west bound direction of Orcutt Road at Laurel Lane, the crosswalk was realigned, and a new accessible ramp constructed to improve circulation for pedestrians and motorists. • Design of a second landscape median on Los Osos Valley Road west of Madonna Road, was completed. Construction of the median, located between Descanso Street and Prefumo Canyon Road, is anticipated to occur in 2006. The beautification project is made possible through grant funding. Bicycle • In October, the City's Police and Parks and Recreation Departments held the annual Bicycle Rodeo instructing City youths on safe bicycling techniques and proper riding habits. • The City's supply of short term bicycle parking expanded by 36 spaces during the first year of the City's "Racks with Plaques"bicycle rack donation program. • In May, the City participated in BikeFest, an annual festival in Mission Plaza that promotes bicycling. Transit • On August, SLO Transit implemented service refinements to improve bus service in the community. Improvements include installing bus route maps at bus stops and working with developers to locate appropriate bus stops for projects on city bus routes. • Taxi service was expanded within the City. • Transit Ridership has increased approximately 20% from the previous year. A total of 939,116 trips were made by transit riders in 2005. The month with the highest ridership was October with a total of 108,767 trips. Pedestrian • With funding from the Community Development Block Grant program, the City installed 42 ADA accessible curb ramps around the downtown perimeter. • Using donated funds, in-ground pavement lights were added to the Ramona Street crosswalk east of Broad Street Transportation Planning Improvements In 2005, the following transportation planning projects were implemented, consistent with programs in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Vehicular • The City prepared signal design plans and specifications for the intersections of Johnson/Ella and Higuera/Granada. Additionally, the City prepared signal plan modifications to existing signal plans at the intersections of Johnson/Bishop and Madonna/El Mercado. 3-6�2 7 pace 19 I city of san lues oaispo Ge► auaL plan annual aspo>zt 2005 • The City published its fourth annual Traffic Safety Report identifying high crash locations within the City and recommending mitigation measures to reduce the crash rates.. • The Marketplace shopping center project which included provisions for the construction of the Prado Road interchange was turned down by voters in April. • A Project Study Report (PSR) evaluating design options for modifying the Los Osos Valley Road interchange was approved by Caltrans and contained five alternatives recommended for further consideration. The City Council reviewed those alternatives and reduced the total number to four to be passed on to the Project Report (PR) phase of the Caltrans process. The next stage of the Caltrans process—a Project Report &Environmental Determination was begun. • The City continued to work with Caltrans to complete a Federal environmental clearance for the Mid-Higuera Widening Project. • The City conducted bi-annual citywide traffic counts. Bicycle • The City resubmitted grant applications for the construction of the Railroad Safety Trail between Hathway Avenue and Foothill Boulevard on City property. • The Bicycle Advisory Committee made further progress on the second phase of their update of the Bicycle Transportation Plan. The City also participated in Bike to Work Week activities encouraging the public to use alternative transportation. • A report summarizing bicycle count data obtained in October 2004 was published. Transit In 2005, the City did the following in support of maintaining and improving bus service and other public transportation: • Approved a new vandal resistant, low maintenance bus shelter design; • Organized the third Annual "Stuff a Bus" Holiday Food Drive; • Implemented a new bus pass structure; • Prepared an annual performance report; • Established a"flash" pass program with Costco; • Reviewed system wide service proposals from the Mass Transportation Committee; and • Established"easy pay" outlets to provide convenient bus pass sale locations at Albertson's and Judson Terrace. Pedestrian • The City continued its efforts to develop the City's first Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Neighborhood Traffic Management Twenty (20) neighborhoods actively pursued the preparation of Neighborhood Traffic Management (NTM) Plans for their neighborhoods. Because so many neighborhoods are requesting NTM projects pdC1E 20 3 � r Lict-;nment 1 city of San Luis OBISPO G�Ral plan annual 2epoat 2005 and implementation funds are limited, staff developed a method for prioritizing the projects. Neighborhoods ranking the highest in 2005 included Ella Street and Johnson Avenue (between San Luis Drive and Laurel Lane). Access and Parking Management • .A Task Force was convened to review and make recommendations on increasing the City's parking revenues in order to fund annual bond payments and the operations of the Palm Nipomo parking structure. The group considered and discussed increasing structure rates, meter rates and in-lieu fees; beginning an assessment district; charging for parking on Sundays, adding parking meters in the city, and increasing parking fine amounts. • The City entered into negotiations with a private party to redevelop Parking Lot 2. • Construction neared completion on the City office space/parking structure at 919 Palm Street. Scheduled for completion in the Spring of 2006, the structure will provide a total of 242 parking spaces of which 192 will be available to the public. The structure will include a "pay on foot" option so users can prepay before returning to their vehicle with the goal of reducing the time it takes for the vehicle to exit the structure. • Progress was made on the design and location of new electronic parking signs along downtown entrance corridors. Installation is anticipated to occur in 2006. Safety Staff Training Section S 8.2.3.A of the Safety Element states that the City will train police officers and other City employees to levels appropriate for their tasks and responsibilities. The training of police officers and communication technicians is regulated by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), which mandates minimum content and hours for basic and in-service training. The Police Department is in full compliance with the POST requirements for in-service training hours for all employees.. This was accomplished primarily by sending employees to POST certified training courses in various topics, with the associated costs reimbursed by POST. Critical Facilities Locations and Reducing Structural Hazards Section S 8.6.1 of the Safety Element tasks the City with identifying and evaluating hazards in existing structures, with the highest priority given to critical facilities. This effort includes maintaining and replacing City facilities, routine code inspections of certain commercial and residential buildings, complaint-based code inspections for all buildings, mitigating hazards associated with unreinforced masonry buildings (URM), and outreach regarding structural safety of private wood-frame buildings. In 2005, the City continued to include Seismic Retrofit as a major focus. In 2004, the City accelerated its timeframes for mandatory strengthening of URM buildings and also established low planning and building fees, low contractor parking fees and hired a part-time Seismic Coordinator to aid building owners in complying with the City requirements. To facilitate timely construction, the City set deadlines for requesting and obtaining building permits for retrofit work. During 2005, these PaC1E 21 3 �9 Atta hment 1 city of san Luis osispo q'imeRal plan annual uep02t 2005 deadlines resulted in permits being requested for every building in the URM Inventory, with issuance of these permits expected by early 2006. The URM Ordinance requires full strengthening by July 2010 unless partial, Level A, strengthening is completed by July 2007. Where Level A is completed by the deadline, Level B work may be delayed until July 2012. Level A strengthening consists of installation of anchors between the buildings walls and roof, walls and floors and bracing any .parapets. Level B consists of Level A work plus installation of the steel members that stabilize the storefront and frame. Distinction between Level A and B was established by ordinance to encourage owners to complete this significant portion of the strengthening process as soon as possible. During 2005, several Level B projects were started and completed. Experience has shown that owners are opting to reinforce to Level B, rather than prolonging the process by completing Level A now and Level B later. Reinforcement .projects continue to come on line at a pace that will assure, if continued, strengthening of all identified URM buildings in the inventoryby the 2010.deadline. New Multi Dwelling Property Inspection Program In 2005 the City of San Luis Obispo adopted a program to improve our annual fire and life safety inspections of apartments (with three or more units), hotels, motels, bed and breakfast facilities, hostel facilities, senior living facilities, condominiums, and sorority and fraternity houses. Fire and life safety inspections are done to protect property owners and residents from the devastating effects of fire. By ensuring a safe living environment in these types of facilities, the chance for fire decreases. Fire can kill, disable, destroy property and completely disrupt lives. A typical fire and life safety inspection at these facilities include checking fire alarm systems, fire sprinkler systems, fire extinguishers, common areas for fire hazards, exit signs and exit access doors, fire lane access, hydrant access and signage. Additionally, the Fire Department will be offering public education materials to apartment owners, managers, and residents to educate them about how to prevent fires from occurring as well as how to increase their chances of survival in the event a fire does occur. The inspection program also includes annual fees, which are projected to provide 77% cost recovery for this State mandated program. The fees vary according to the type of property being inspected. Fees are collected on the annual County property tax bills. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan In 2005, City Fire Department spearheaded a city-wide project. The Fire Department, along with other City staff and the assistance of a consultant, has prepared a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan that will guide the City toward greater disaster resistance. It is in full accord with the character and needs of the community as well as federal requirements. The potential hazards identified and assessed in this Local Hazard Mitigation Plan include earthquakes, floods, hazardous materials events, landslides, wildland fires, and windstorms. Mitigation actions include a range of specific actions and projects that reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on protecting new and existing buildings and infrastructure. PaC16 22 _�� Attachment 1 My of san Luis osispo r.L_-eal plan annual aepoRt 2005 Neighborhood Quality Code Enforcement Community Development The City's Code Enforcement Officer reports directly to the Chief Building Official. The code enforcement office deals primarily with violations of building codes and zoning regulations. Code enforcement activities related to neighborhood quality would include such issues as: • Garage Conversions • Conversions of other structures, such as storage buildings • And violations of the Uniform Housing Code Of the 358 total complaints received in 2005, 45 could impact neighborhood quality; 26 alleged garage conversions, 3 conversions of other structures and 16 complaints regarding substandard living conditions. These numbers are similar to 2004 activities, however nearly half the amount based on activity for 2003. The reductions could be attributed to the introduction of a mediation program started in 2004. Keep in mind that the report of a problem does not always mean that a violation exists. Often, the report of a garage conversion may just be residents using the garage as a weekend gathering place, perhaps to watch a football game or play video games. These types of activities could create a nuisance in the neighborhood, which would result in a call.to the code enforcement office. Since the introduction of the SLO Solutions Program, residents now have an outlet to discuss problems that occur in neighborhoods and resolve issues. In the past, when a tenant was upset with the landlord due to living conditions, or a neighbor was upset about the weekend get-together, their only recourse was to call the code enforcement office to report, what they believed to be, substandard conditions or a code violation. Often when an inspector would investigate the problem it would invariably be minor in nature and directly related to lack of cooperation from one side or the other. Now, instead of calling the code enforcement office to report a violation, tenants or neighbors can contact Creative Mediation at no cost to seek assistance, advice and mediation services to resolve disputes. Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update In 2002, the Neighborhood Preservation provisions were adopted into the Zoning Regulations. These provisions were highly supported by the neighborhood groups and through collaboration between staff and neighborhood groups, standards were adopted to help prevent visual blight of our neighborhoods. The code enforcement office is responsible for a few of these provisions and other violations are enforced by the Police Department's Student Neighborhood Assistance Patrol (SNAP). Enforcing the provision regulating overgrown vegetation initially had the largest impact to the Code Enforcement office. This section states that it is a violation to have: "Trees, weeds, or other types of vegetation that are dead, decayed, infested, diseased, overgrown, or harbor rats or vermin and are visible from the public right of way. For the purpose of this chapter, "overgrown" is limited to lawns or weeds over twelve inches in height." In the beginning there was concern that becoming "lawn police" would be considered too much regulation, however, the community groups agreed that if it the regulation was enforced reasonably it pAC46 23 .3 —,31 Atta4-hment 1 city of San LUIS osIspo q,�ual plan annual RspoRt 2005 . would be helpful to enhance neighborhoods. During the first two years after adoption of the regulations there were nearly 100 violations each year. The code enforcement officer then began an outreach program with local property managers and included language in violation letters, which went to property owners, warning repeat offenders that subsequent violations would result in fines. The number of violations immediately went down. We have had 24 and 18 violations for 2004 and 2005 respectively. Fraternity& Sorority-Inspection Program 2005 concluded the second year of a Fraternity and Sorority inspection program. This revitalized program is designed to provide safety inspections for these "group house" occupancies. Past inspection programs were conducted by Fire Department and Building Department inspectors and solely focused on safe buildings. For the past two years inspections have been conducted by a Fire Inspector, the Code Enforcement Officer and members of Cal Poly's Student Life and Leadership Department. Including staff members from Cal Poly has proven to work well. There are now increased efforts to counsel the groups regarding safe and conscientious behavior both in their organization and in the community. This broader approach of proactive effort and linking with Cal Poly has given additional clout to the program and helped improve relations between the Cal Poly and the City. The net result of these combined efforts helps increase awareness within the campus organizations. They are encouraged to think of safe and proper conduct within their organizations and within the community. We strive to impress upon these groups that they are responsible for maintaining safe living conditions, conducting safe events and they should serve as good stewards within the community. Parks & Recreation In 2005, the City took these major steps to implement policies and programs in the Parks and Recreation Element: • Staff continues to offer programs and services that enhance the quality of life in San Luis Obispo. New programs and events include a Sports Festival, Family Movie Night, and Water Polo Camp. • The Damon-Garcia Sports Fields were officially dedicated in May 2005. The facility will aid in addressing an unmet community need for turf-based sports. • The Playground Replacement Program continued to be implemented with replacement of worn equipment at Throop Park and the design phase for Anholm Park was started. • Staff evaluated the possibilities of utilizing synthetic turf to expand sports field uses for year- round use. A future capital improvement project request will be drafted to convert Stockton Field at Sinsheimer Park to a synthetic turf facility. • In its efforts to enhance service delivery, Parks & Recreation staff upgraded their online registration service and added the ability for customers to view or reserve available park and building facilities online. • An amendment to the Joint Use Agreement between the City and School District was completed in 2005. A portion of the agreement asks that City Ranger Services be used to assist in patrolling school district fields. 3 -.3a- PAGE 24 hllQ�I11i1Glll 1 city of san Luis o5ispo Ger,RaL plan annual uepout 2005 • Design work was completed for enhancing softball fields at the County's El Chorro Regional Park. Construction for field lights and improvements is set to begin in early 2006 and adult softball games will move from Stockton Field at Sinsheimer Park to El Chorro by Summer 2006. • Laguna Lake Golf Course completed the installation of a 55 foot Mono Pine-like cell tower as a part of an agreement with Sprint. An additional cell site with Cingular was finalized in 2005. A wastewater filtration system was installed to prevent contamination of groundwater supplies. • Work on the Therapy Pool project continues with an anticipated construction start in 2006. • The Mitchell Park Bandstand was completed and dedicated in July 2005. The project was a cooperative effort by both San Luis Obispo Rotary Clubs and donated to the City. • Ranger Services accomplished maintenance and trail work in several open space areas. An environmental education program was restarted and expanded to include teens and seniors. Staff continues to work with Police on cleaning up homeless encampments along San Luis Obispo Creek. • Programs for "Boomers"— ages 50 and above, continue to grow with classes featuring Global Gourmet, noontime talks on health and wellness, and computer classes. • The City's Aquatics program continues to offer instructional classes, lap .swim and recreational swim opportunities throughout the year. Classes are in high demand, including Lifeguard Training, Water Safety Instruction, Springboard Diving, Baby and Me, and Guard Start. • The Parks & Recreation Department has maintained its efforts to offer parent certification training for youth sports programs through the PAYS (Parent Association for Youth Sports) as well as training youth sports coaches through the National Youth Sports Association. Program Status The General Plan contains an array of programs covering most types of City actions. The Housing Element, in particular, includes many programs with specific time frames. The written portion of this report touches on the major programs that saw activity in 2003. A status list of all General Plan programs follows. While General Plan elements are usually revised on a 5 to 10 year cycle, the City Council makes priority determinations as part of the two-year budget process, which supersedes the target program-completion dates contained in the General Plan. Staff will continue to update and correct this list throughout the City's goal-setting and evaluation activities. 3 33 PaGE 25 iAlla-ti ' ent 7 O E >8 LI! O •p r g, 0. J ` a gg f' m O . _ Fs a m cp E c :- U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 00 O o z. U 0 y v rpt. J a M y � co y F- '-Cl) c co co z5 m C6 O r. r c6 cu r C d J r O C c0 cl CCPI N y (A v U 0) W �s ctj CLy i J C a) Co Z M 1 O U 0 � = C ❑ C O L y o �+ m co ^ _� p ^ y y r C w CL U CO •C C U C Cl) (Mco Z. O C N ca d = w c0 CO 0 to J a E CCf) _O CO .. `. 0 to CO •; (D y .y.. 06 O � -0 � y Q c m j' c' .� C o c M ri o r� C 3 o m ED y y R{ .a N _ lL a N n cj(iG y G7 i .C., C. W! •X L 'C O CC C• L 7 � O M N C M O 0) O O a) G, � o w CL O0 CD c > NJNd: Mw V y m U • Z.' C C D N n '_ J N U O ,- C CD r CO U m y O J co T O y J M m 7 a a C J y L j C d y Q r N C y J vi M O = co '] DS *C4 O y m y d y� Q N J O m C M CL o V c0 ca CD > = LC) — 7 U d y c4 y co y O U L m . 2 y 2 = a aiS O w C m U m O -0 cao C o D cOj C D Q (C m E ';; `O C L J N y p y «. Cl) i y 00 m CD J a O J i .. Y N c3 i OCa ca CL t'n i 0 U U O m t cl O C C m v 7 co M m c6 0 W CL y N y C y m m ` U f0 CD .y.. a = C m (� y O m 'y0y •r i 0 s r O CD O 3 � 0 O OCD C E m m C '- L C S N C V o co .9�t. YCL Z —_ W y C •E U L U O r� •� N C •� Y L y J CL ra O C y C6 y y C a y y y i p 0 'C y U U C C 0 O` N C "8 m ,�- m m lC = 3 C 7 C w +' p 7 m C Ccr 41 C L C Co r cd O = m L m m Q) V � C w N p L m O i� m O ?i c;:s 0 m y i m U C y C C O C m 0 0 0 O N Y C O Co c O 1y O m (0 t co N p p , p i «. C U CCD E m TT3l Y J p > •� YI y V y • CIS -0 ,� T " • y y CA y N C E <A m C C m. •+y„ o °� >. 0 0 7 O r y i O c0 CD 7C co C V to U U C = 0 y (0 w L a" : N � m CL 3 q' @ AA a d CO CD m a 0 C O y C n CD L. w C.21 p C. .>, a .� J L Ad m IL c4 co O c0 O Cti J L O w i Q ❑ N •- i Q ,C r CL �� 3 o a y : 3 _ .. v 'a n 3 c m ycl «U C 5 > �' o m Cpj CD O = U •N C 0 y cO m CD > p O O C a 72 w •2 C � •C7 N > O � o Co O 0 O 0 > � • rw — �� mw ❑ a m ¢ OCL CN < < UaUQ ¢ oCocaZQw � w CL m3 m mmmm mma ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � o ❑ ❑ 0000 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ QQ QQQQ. QQU U UUUUUUUUUUUUU U UQ 1 h: O .` r N M Lf) CO f� O CA O r N CO) V cs) CO Ih OD 0 II 0 r N M W Z ,;, r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N ),Auacnment 1 L O m ;N. d E w' 2 U v W. �. 0 3 O J J J N q. m c o-;-., Eco m c O 00000000000000 00 00000 0 O U � D _ D N .Ji C v N U � � c E d 3 r JU 0 y O ` O 0 J LL N r > CO O O Qm O .� lA L p J •.C—_. co 7 N i �, p _ CD J W O cn r cC c °� 3 C x off$ m N t cl U O � J �. y ._ m c co .� ` co J y m J j y 3. � p M J N C U p E r m y ` C C U C w c U m Cl 7 N ° w cn 3 p Y �' o y r cD y O2 c o2S M U ° U m C C cG O D 3 J J O r r C N U O M CO cA n • O �rj W J r Uy y d CV !O D m W i y = CA N o D r co co o 'a -5 � c � J Q c c c c J y p O > J 'B J m r o O N N U N N y Cl O l6 O (0 y m co ce) Z y O co cCC m r O r W atf O y m -�° • w 0 y J C i p + U O i r m V .. Q O 7 y i J m y .Cl z0m ° •> ram) M � 3 � ° v om .'= ovCccmQ r,: cm ° E oy omCl ° v y r ^ O _ Co T 0 N p y O V c0 m V N (.) m UCL i p Q m = y •U c r c ? E L � O U J U 'L J 3 '•' C O d N C9. 'aaa 0 _j c co•- C p i > 0 co cC (C co rn m e o v� J m o > � y m ° m E o m > . m E O ai m o ` c c y E m y p r c o co o0E 0 -ao > mm rn Q3Emo co � c�c � cYa e l6 CL tl) 7 (0 O C O O t ° c6 c6 > y O O J > CISa C m U tm C ` L 45 C •(6 O m O m U C •� C E � C7 o ca m o y CX 0" (1) y c c -3 c m o o o0 0 `�° $ U c c m c y i m cmi c c m o y :° a� p C m o _ � m m m 0 m c 0 ° 'mL0 CO co Q Co co o o U m ` :9 c O c m E `) .- v°, o ° „� �s � M m y m m o o m o �a y :° E 3 C n ° > o > m m E 0 c B. -v s +. = ca N ¢ t c y c c c E v E c o o 'y w v �[ U p m w m a ^ car o .N ° c ° ai ymayi > cN ° a > 3c3 ° <° m ° sow ocamE E m c o ` m m e c Q m ° p _ c ° �_ CF, .- U m _Zu c C c6 c j p O C c E U O co J i m y C U O 3 m N C O y • ` IC _ 7 ¢ m N �' m O p y a a CL O J E y y CT, a CO m C U m co Y a) !_ C C m `� y O m f N Co N m my � � o3 � 0o � ° omot: 3oac � ° v°im `� ° a c p y y y m O O y m 2Y C L m >_ E ` a � ._ C y C y Co CL Q aa' owo� � � ¢ c� CL 2 CQ 1.2 (L "` � � � � � Q �iO. UWJZ (A � WaUN Amo 00000000000000 00 c � � � � 030oo U° ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ 00 • 2 N co N (°� (h C7 CV9 C� Cl) m C] C�9 C�9 d° V v V ' IT It v It LO cn cN cLO l! ' / 1llMJi i•iivi • O r col m L E G E ¢' v W. Z% ;V' v atll � :LL G ,q J Q. fp m G co ~' a c U O CL Dco `t U -- J 06 i N N N m y V* y Ch U J 3 C j '6 J (n L6 Nco O C _ 0) <A a) D r N O C t J CV O N J U L O W C C a) � 6 N I- O y O S O N V N W E O cz .5 L 7 N m fU6 'NO co y �_ O co L J E 7 E of • C J CV m tm S C D E cc C co a) N N '� p J 0 0 L 7 V v J ° ° Q - c m c r Co U � ° CO J co _ C O Q •> r Co ao cm 03 • U U co ° C 0 C\i C •° � � C 0 a) O N co 3 �• J N 'Co O O O U N r CO a) J � a -0 CU E T- O n W O O CO 3 O '- N E m U 0 _X .:� Q c C 4; • °� CO m m m C CV J J C o co 0 o E 0 c E J O J O • •0 y m a) O Jco . 0 cl m .0C N 3 E 0 N L 2 U O U co W y 0 y 0 E N N N 0 •-E- co •y •O(D c CD a1 ° m 0 N co E C N a1 O •� ° L C C (� m tm N a) — L co V ro m U Q y C9 a t6 ;C N O C9 "O N. '6 «cc 7 U «_ L ID �2 _ m .E cc N C C (n ` C w L m m c co wc J y = C m •3 a1 0 C y C CL CL o Q .E > > a) m cif 30 m co O m O O w Ctf L a1 o c «. m O oco 'D C L Q) m lC 3 "r a O C n- E C C •° C C c C r0.. N '° � � � a) 0 •m G. C. 0 m i w -- c c tJn 3 Y `� C v o o ° o o ° ; o v, o rn m moo – y to m C C C C C C E :. 0 N c «. L of 3 ° C ° w 3 ° '3 .� a' m ° c ca q m � ° m m c Ej O Y w v °o m co is c c 0) (a c m c o CD C o `a Co c° O o m m m CO - m — o 0 0 -0 Zi ° U - `O r—(D mCX Naci3m � C� aSr ° c � C t .- otv� m m` ° ° m O w ° m 0 CL c m co d a o 'c $ _° o � c m 6 0 7 m V ` m O N N m m Cl m W m J 4? N n0i � •0 CO D O E E L 0 C W v o 3 co m v ry ov a) m �? °� m o 3 ao m 3v m m y U Y ,m 7 fA fA CA +=i to W S2 m y O C .0 d1 0 m m T' T N ° m Y 0 7 m c � 0 > � •> cNcccc >> Lj > Eo > T > Z > sf3 � '> m �aooCY O .— p m > a1 O O m 0 0 a1 T m 0 _ ,. C9 nj N 3 N U d > O O • UUQ �i � W QUJU � UUOCjS :5 W 0- Q4aco � J CJQ Og � UQ v – 0 0 Cc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01010 0 0 In 0 m m � 0U ¢ Uc�ic�iUUU c�i000U v UUU Uc0iU v aaaa to nmo � " c °Dz ni n cm cccc o co . ( ? mahmenll / � IIII $ E . Qv . * 6 - � k $ v # . 4a0 E: a & . D m ° u � u2 . a) co co 5 � = - D CD 0) mi © : Cc$ co . SCL 0 2 � . 0025 * # -j- 2 2 ) @ LO / co =) 2 2 f y �_ (D m a) v - ) 270 mf \ e D & 070 # -DC6 ON W co Ul) "a $ 0 , \ $ 0EkF $ mom . � o o . JCL CL ID k \ CL` a 2@k § § 2 " k � � � \ SD02Co CtS T @ § § f 8 ° 0 0 . 2 2ca cc E $ / 0 Cl c 2@ $ % e f a : o ■ g c £ e @ ® 2 (D0tE -6 a c & V $ � $ \ CML $ R alCL CL k CcE wr- � cu � � r � � � a . = o 0 o E (coo - cc c . .a o - © 0 © - R » a o C % k 0 rX 6 o <Cp, Cl ® o 0 0 � . a c ClE m . e = .:30JmE 0) 0E CL � o CO @ Cl C � k � 2 � 2 .� co CL 2 2 ' 0 © g 0 £ � f � $ o222 � m ■ . 77 § ■ 8 e � ` t G $ « « « E e a / a. 32 � k � \ -j a: ka2222RRSq RE7 � wco CD C) . a � m � � p � Com c@0) F�L:•ucril2 ? t N = [D O O N a " c E W Sm « mm n ;us C v0 W � 0 O yJ ca Q Q m O }o E I U U U 0000 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU O C U O lO y c4 cM c0 N N a) > N r .r c0 C6 S N c S CC CC O C7 = O y CO cm S = a L .O C S m y c ,= m E '''.' c m O :5 v E a a cu d cLO Cf) O tm � N CO C > ch S co m > c7 O co (.. m C6 0 CM m 0 N -00 co '� r c Z C1 M t S c 0 E 'O c Crj S � n cM co tL 0 CV O c Q ^ m c� co c � c N r «m L CA c O U c6 S r W NIg o lu 2S �j d cri c o 3 crib c = 3 0 o • cl m c 3 rn o o is ao 0 _ �? m y t �'f = o � � 0 3 m E ° S2 m 0 C m g • (A C1 L m C = CO w 7 0 R1 r c c (� �. o Z, m 3 CO > rn E y cam Co CO o Or E • C m r C L 0 O c C 3 - Q� 0 'i r y 0 Q X = o c6 m o ° rn � 'y 0 m 0 C9 E c m e oo E m } y c0 v c 0 o m m 0 L c E o m a 0 CA vi o m r = a1 N O m • m CO E O — � S O -a m m CO •� � � m c = r- > 0 y O t m Y 'v' Co c m 2 Ij -a E y y L ca m S O S r o W co) � oyo � m0 c � o c ER mn. m S p C N N y 0 CL 0 � C9 c m E c N m � L m � o m c O O E mt > cri d — .. pjS o x m 3 3 � .m c c ? AiEcc l u i ccc ai I � r O (o cd: a M o =ID $ •o 0 v W x U. cm c 3 :O j J J J J J J J xN a ra. =' m c F•: r 4' m O yF'p, � Oc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 000 0 0 T O 2 N M � L W = T M N N = i M M M CO r p M cri m >' ` O = O 7 co N O M U C'6 ' O i L y M c O ° Tc1 E 02 r m C m a C2 ccl Tc Ti •� C O ° .� M 0 O O U L m CD -0cis C CL T L co U C Z m O M N m E. « m 2 .m =O 0 7 Cl 0 C 2 coL0 ,. m (LC i c L x O p m a M U ° Y a L � _0 y cUT m O CONT = co 0 rn 3 o L N T 0 2 c E 2 r C co E o y 'p CU Ch f 1 O V O m N cq (U � m p m L .. .. 0 O o m p ? C C t i CU d co c cn E O T O �O M m m cu 3 TC'i N = CUL O CO L v a O Co E r w m M E a m m � o - 3 0 ori � ai o f o c o 2 rn 2 m0 CO c w- ° E CO U) = m a r m E m 'co m c Co > a 0 �, E02 = caa � � a 0 = � � c0 > E � Eom o rn 'o 2 ° ri v � U o CL C m m E ca U) aim cissa E Oc O c c o o c c 'co m a c0a ° m 0 X w CD s m L o 0 .. E ° m 2 m m m e o c m m 2 E a ' ° m m ri o m -0 cis y 0 — c co 3 0 c 3 'o m ocl M Cl) O C C y L ° 7 C 0 O U CU y O a U C 0 O '2 0 V Cl) '6 C 0 > ` U c = ® .Oc M o 7 C 3 y zr- a C m rn m m d _ 0 o L. 0 m mC7 E m 0 (D C>C C E O_ c U 'O C m ��„ M m �, CSU C vU• it, W C C :� CLU = y m CL 2 0 7 " o O -- m E m 06 C C ° O a '(q m O m m m 0 0 m U U > m a m m i U > j O U m •D E c a 0 U fU • ° m > c = w .. m m c E o m 3 o v v n c maC cocr, m Ec rnm mc0i ` oE Lmcm ,_ m m Y m > y c -0 0 0 m Ca 0 7 co E C cd 0 .. w ` m C c v m m = a y �o — E c c o m c m c � 0 CL o o o c—° := C o � 0 3: 0) c cmi F o r- m 3 ui m o m cYi v c v m O E a E E a y > c •- m 0 cis L ° y a ° m ro o °� c M y � .� 0 0 7 m U Cl m O C N 0 D � m � � m j0 O C. L i m E o U V O L E a = 0 m m � w •C a s '�-' 7 a m �. m m m ° m c m.0 0O C C m r Q M 0C (0 C c m U ri E 5 a i E m O2 O = N 15- L U •U m Y UA °IS L —co "D 0 > L .r Co N y m '2O O r cl. 0 m m • o m m � mML Cl. CL 0 w ca d E , c2 m oCL 0 CL Co cmmm (D CM a: oma m - 3 — aio LN � � r (J C tU m i Co Z Co Co L U m m U m rnCL ccs -om � w_ cmias � � c`�i0v_ _arco = ° 0c o 0 � � 0-Ne033 m COCl L O ° C6 U C > 7 U U > U > > _� C Y m c0 M cd m r cl O 0 m > m i ° w � 3ciww � awow < 0CL• n`0. 20 wC6MLLa)' � wv� ¢ � wo ¢ 0 0 ,� % v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � � � UUUUUUUUUUUUUU CL UUU UUU . ❑ UU UUUUU o OrNMd LnccoNCOMOrNM � COCOh 0000 T1!� Ca d CL70 co Z N N N N N N N N N <V m M C7 r') m m M M m e I v � IV d• r r r r T T r r r r r r r r T r r T T T T T r r r r r r r Aft« hment .1 r i r An r = m �N; d E mZak W � 0, G 0 . O: J J A ;w m 0 0 E c O d; U O CO c0 t0 = M C6 C C _ N Z O O c0 W L c d' — CM c j O C w LO m Tcn C7 CO = U C9 :3Ch Ci ` c ('' CG • O —W cm C C (h m = _ CV) 0 • -r- o c0 to = caU M ch m0 cv m L c7 — C ' C (h C r r m co E cu 'O 2 .3 mCS O y pj C o W m m > c a • Ca U 72 = ` (o m m O 0 = W m m C ,wD imCN 5m ca r- N - - � COy m O O U m 0 cm cm OL > OmOCcU CLCOrs oO 'o 0 C + O 0 m O m y co ' m = X = c ;O i Z co m m L O E > O m c •m cin m O m U c m c > c • CL CL • oc o� �� Um _3c oaO «t wc0OO .: m 0Wp e cLc y cm £m 0ca � c Nmt° wOc oa v � a 0 3 :r o c o m > m � o m — cLts .tm m E _ m to y m O m m e E U m LQS N N > m m U > 3 w • m > 0 - •� W 7 • m •p y �- :. m m m c c CS lz O m C m U m L L E a m fn CO C co = C C m +m. 0 0 a > co m — m W ca y m y w O co �m m C 0 > c 0 C 'm0 C m ca .c CD i W m m :2 IL IL � � � � WWo y� � .- o � 0000000 000 �. S 0a°Oc 0i 000LLicoi0a000 • O O r N C4 et c0 CO P CD CA O r Z to to to to to LO to co l0 U') CO CO r�u�:;rlf�lBfli 1 E 0 r� U 'r= . LU Ni fp ' U. ;° 0 Q y Q m o ,sy F-. a o . . U U U U U UU UUU UU U U U U UE c U o O U =� O ' eX? fn N - 'D ;. tg+, N m +. N c a= (1) U M ua" cq Ci 0 D. pj 'S'( C .•" C7 O COcri m Co cnU � o >1 C aC's o a � 2 E i co r m O O co m I� a 0 L M G7 m i CO 4f co mc U Ch Q C M i U co GI S.v > m Y co J (D 0 L "4a Q cc OC d i m O O CL cm > o -Z. U m 7 m E _N f6 a O M W in o co rn � c N c m a E U m L cn ri m m m o U o o E C: c to CD j• � T a coo �! r co a E co C cn •- •E Cl) •� T W, C c (n J c0 fh m co O M c. .— L = ... RS U CD CL O '� 0 O M co T c "" O -o 0 U c U co 0 UL m .% C rML c`7c6 •c <L � `oma c co m N cn co U m Ln c r j �C (C6. J co 0 i m a c v 0 0 `>_ C/3 j O 0 m d r rn _c a o w m fA O U ° U M m 3 N o _c E cn co Z2U � c—oOoN y «S � m � M °�) vmio 00 ID Eo �' ° CO m m �- o cri c c U co Co > m fl E = c a m ca o � rn aYi CO 0 t v p m m v o N Co i 0 . 7 co C of T U) (o m` Y i. L •� c ' C U .-. r c cn c (o ►. Q U m J co m C y co mmCC CD mOm �' � � Eaa� yv c 0Cf) Ec c m m > c m c m 3 v Z c a_mi c �- ma m v a $ E. mo mc0 Um m UcoEai . > m co . E r3� t r- m � E U Y '6 m -o 0 w co O U m Q O cn E .: QS co m CL co C m co as Cr U •E m o L co E O c ''k.'... Q CO t m c w U (o .mc y +�-� O m i ID O E •m. m E u'{� CL co «. i O C C7 �' (o 'U m Cls a C o ca C •-• 7 7 tea, U O U = $ O C L co U m c6 ° . O co m U `0' syF,,. O .� w Y cc 7 �' O � W ` E CoCL (0 U c c m � m � m m Cl) • ' v m cgal 2 g m co U U E M ° co °'co Q m E v N U E '° U m ?" co w U '° U o0 ad C VJ cats)C Ecc, y O O _� cc) O c 211 O ° °� w E j W m m o a o >, :� C T c o �j o O o U C C Y ;?` C +� Co m O O C C co m C. cn m m U C 7 7 U c E ? m o 0 c E caa co .m r0 ° o a 'o � � Ut o o OC6 co m o m 0 m Cd m CoE ° o c U .. co Y U me U J U > c o o c c a) CC moi m o co o oUU E co y ari m Co day co 0U Nw m o O o ECL Cl. o 3 3m � ;g _� N - o ,riw3 m �? o m m � 0 o c c ,ems ` C. > > U > Y O c c .c (o > T O ,` U W O > > U W U w > T C am ° O m m O m ° ° C6 m M w m 'i ° C y 'O m ° m c j c m mco o I � U0000 � 3C6CE � � wo0a � waao � acw ow � a00 Z00000000 coo 00 0o00000 00 0 0 aaaaaaaa aaa as aaaaUUU UU U U y:" NMd L01.0 N00m 0 CM MIt cACOn00mOT NM et LO co � .?; cccocococacococo nnn nn nnnnna000 co 00 OD 7' �A: L Q' ,N a v Ul U � p 0 J J J J J �Q H. m Cl 4 m o y; Co 0000 O 000 O O 00000 O O ccn m O O c O L7 0 �. O O NO C N U U M COo COcE ami N -O o O Cl rm c? r cn a cO a O U a CO CO CY) 75 W (0 C7 t .� C U Cr) C U C p i �, m _ Cl) 3 0 V c rn °> � Z m -0 O cOi M O N m a m as m CD 0 (D C r m y N r 0 r C7 O y rnE E rO � - 0 c. " r- 6 6 r> � clCOE c M o O O O CO 0 '_ O m C r M r t r O O N !A U D •• Nr r U O N C l y m r FQ CA O qn C7 C!1 0 0 O 0 c c pY Cj y fA CN7 8 r ca Cr E2 0 O CD U) ca Om m U c6 m m M m ° 3 3 EZE c0tt 0NmON3 � pm O 0 c O 0 CO ca 0 M O0 CE ca c CL c U 9 mCim m N m CO E C m O m m m sn a omm mwO � V OW r M O O . . . m m m m C6 C (n ` N . O 2 m y U Ctf C M r i U U U U 7 � S3 •V. C O 'p E 0 _ m f!1 U CO C6 C. 0 �m m m rn m LIl c m — N �O m U m. oZS N Cl) m E m E n m c o `m -+ Y = p co p 3 ns c N o 3 0 3 m c o O E W y O O O 0 LL LL 30 r C o w U = cYC O O O = • O O O O r a 3 0 U .0.. '7 = m U O cm CL — `. c • •o m � � Nmw: M cm :a� ° a3 3 � � ° °'0h � ay � ocao UU U � o cd Y 0 0 0 CC, lz cm E ca CO c CL o c .. c 7 E UUU o O 0 m „ IZ cc- m 97yO 0 C 0 0 O O C O > m 75 _rC my V 3 OU N � 0O m 3Y c m m 0 ca ca R ca O mC mc 'OLC7� CCrC 3Earwc cm c m m m m 0 m m m m m y (� O m •' 0 0 m a w m CA CT t O O 0)r m C C U CC CC C6 O 0 = O O c0 M c0 ' 0 ` c _O = m CO � M � m C C co a O O m m m i i � i 3 i Q i m L i m m '.' 3 C i 3 3 3 r '0 3 U 0 7 3 7 _ 7 O CA CO r C p C0J U � U M U p U 17 Ch U C7 U r o i U m 0 `p � E O y r y " E �° � •' m p i C C C'9 C C C C C U C 7 0 0 ! w 0 X C 0 U 0 0 0 O m CO m 5awwc6wOw3www0waaQw m � ww3 0 L 00c4i0 i v - O 0 0130 0 0 OFcrQQ 0: 200 10 m caaD0 0 000 0 0 a700606ad otf000 00000 0 � OdQQU U UUU U U 0waaa aQUU UQQUU U eZ r CrO Or rO .- .N- TM 'Tt rO Ico INICO rO O O CO COt) O O CAAO O A 00000 0000 O10- Or N NN N N N N N N N N Nrr Afta-hme 1 § � u § � lu / � | p � $ k ! � XCL IM 00 . � 0 k cts Cf) cri . . / f kW 0/ — aCL / / k\ w / % ° � 2 29 / E 'E @ E @§ 7 . . . e � 0 \ m m 2 2 0 E § @ 0 § , e Cl coo " \ Cl 0 CO CO o 'c 0ca � \ ] \ � . ca . � - . .r— E E f \ . c G G o E c & E 2 = ° 0 2 c ee § 2 8 > .0- . . 3 >, § 322K . L 2 S 00 a » IL20 � aar- § � 7 Ewca c $ © � 2 § 12 § $ EI 000 x# . Ea Cl »d • E k $ © ) 2 $ E 2 . cr, __ � - Cee � M § OsCL C � kR a CL Gam c2E � ƒ � $ $ - $ / e � kLL / Ekkkkkk . - oak 2cdcr = kaS22 2SR ƒ � . . . � . n # ILOICD w CO Cb . 2NQQ C%lG § C%l cli Attar"Ment Im o � x N m a E o � V E w7 W r U. O O J a D m CD CD a m o Eim o` U UUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUU000000000 cio` �cli a) T 06 co a (� V U N V OJ c rn °� c cts CD n n U C Y CO O �' cp U _r N C �C T O CO cr T a p Cl) � U U m e U ca W O> C13 U to Q_ - 3 3 0 m as c ca p c m = rco pU F U cx co cm N m m () " r C i o0 . Q! m U co 0 p L T E , w 3p CO = _ C Z m U LN coo > °O O a 0 � UUT w CL 2 a c `" U p 2 m m Y t O T w U m 0 E W m U o($ 0 r i «. w O C i QJ as r 3 E Rf i i • J V m ;� m E (n a C r 0 coL .m., E m a w m m 0 v- m C m O ca U O m O m Z m ° 3 Z O L c6 > c yT O m — O vi `- U m w m p � v mY ¢ ot o m CL m �• • m w 0 r OD C °'� J r nj Cm RS Q T t C 0 N ptf U V • �e 3 n 40D U) *' s c� = o a J U m m C a• O p c m C7 C _ p 7 ::. h M ° M E C O m > O V p m U i m U V j r O U r O 7 r r «� co r m cc i O w N « .. _ m co m U cfi m •p waw N m cr) pC '_ O r m a O m 0 0 0 m r 3 C 0 " ° >CD m m .C. - - c Y m U o U °� E O m co m ' d 0 of p co U U m — V a _ m N Co .0 C m m C 3 • of m V 0 c6 E 0 0 m m colLo 7 E : Q N 0 m -p m Y m C CISO r i Q E C m m m m C 0 —g CDmj O O E Cl w tC6 (� C m m 7 ca a � N � V E w3 � c � mc° ocamma > o mmmca co E m a m E m w C m U C O O m o V c"» t cco 0 CL m m m E O i U 0 co O) w C m m of O p O aC .6 m a ca '- i V m • fd J O 'Z V ca N .� Q .�. Y m II m .0 a O C m m m O 0 c> > m i 0 m i m m a. m 0 y C m V 0 0 IZ C 7 C .�.. N +.+ m p E m E V c6 r of r E Q m e co O C 0 O of O R Y 3 m O a i m m M m m 0 •U m O m x .. co w gOC m m m m NQ CL E 3 1 0 0 = 003 E c m a 0 0 ow ° 0005 m 'otwo ` m - c coaS cmUami 'c0 m 0 m c U v U r � z -o c S Q c 0 U c 0 E T p otf O E L • c w 0 ca0 Uasr d 0 7 Y C p N O () mom .. m O O E m U °'6 ° a: U) >,c� � 0 cc a 0r- m0 E < o � 0 E J 9 30 « oU rx EaC o0a m0 0 « c o 0 ma ?� coo € cMQ v° m 30 c 8U) 000 0 c = waa c0 3 ° N " 0 a: o `m EV m0 m m 0 p 0a m0 ° " cca c c° mp 0aS m -- E 0 Cr as m � U « co Co •- U m — = t m U U m o E m OC m o d N m co Q C yS coo -- y C m 4? O U a " m E y E" O c� LO of CC m O m m m Rf 7 m .m m O l4 RJ J i a 0 3 . E m cQ J m m .. 3 C H p C m m m o m ° as 0 -- > > (n O p a 0 001 0 m o — ° ;, o m 0 c m 'cc C °p a m c mcr > W C m .0 O a° m m 0 w 0 3 'C m c g V 3 0 O` yw ¢ w0 =) ir Lu < wa. m3Qa[ a[ 000aQOw0Dn. 0 v Uvaaaaaa aaaaa- a. a.. a. a. aa.. aaaaaaaaaaaa�' N N N N N N N N N N m m cco c cq 7 (� Cc7 (c7 c) m m v IT Q V � � � � � � Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Aiiammem i t r' a E 0 mg 22222 W 1u �_ rO. 0 0 JJJ rn Q N Q, c yEo00000000000 O 0000000 00 0 U � O C M U r co >� U N to -p p co _C6 o[ �_ n, It c U 7 O 0 r O r •0 J ° U a U N U com 0 � c" 2 IO � O m a O N *E w O O C 0 r N C V E L m m tri o cn 00 0 co U a U C° r C o cts 3 c V y C 0 In(D Cor r et U ca a T co m m 0 m r -p -c.0 cm Oi i � •� � U m ca M S U O m t V to > O r I o o` 0 3 c t m m r m V CL CO O c C O io 0 CO s p CO m M CO 0 co C � V •0 0 L <T 3 m r W ai 0 — O COa O 3 olf m cv C C m i E U o p U O 0 �? O L ,_ C O «. p Cl) U O i ^ U 7 CO m O E 0 V to m C O L N C r� to f` r C C A rn ° � U 0 U m � w m CO E � '� cn CO ca U —_ oSs C n m c 0 to CD m co o c i m E m a V >CD v c 4) cc U ° m U m m C n U c a) to r m to CL _ O c a m ° c CL 0 y C 0 > = o U ° cm m Y 0 U = 0 0 ., 0 c O "' 7 c to c _ c c E ° m o c m c w a c co o m n m m 0 .� 0 ' C m i m 0 > m O 0 E y c� co to '0 i m m ri �' i m m lz cc p ca c ° c m m _ m v v cd Y .- U o a ® m c 3 m ° p iL 0 co m c co G co O0 co m r a 0 0 O U 06 o f c «CE cn O m c ° m E m " m et a ` m c 0 m Y c co to cn E 0 CD E � 0 a E a Y .. m ° E c a v p —CL CL— c c m' co co w is m c c c ro s m` —aoi o 'c E cts `o m �_ UI c � m CL o o Esso ° cc � � m m ° > v 0 0 0 o O C � 7 m > E U o V O m pI C0i N .fl E ;O O .a c E '6 C m m O C m C ) ` 0 ` C d dl W O a - = c0i m N CL 00 N c .m C 3 Q -j O p c C cx O O t~o co m Co o -o m c 0 0 0 o c ai c c E r ° cn r U cn ° `� ° 5 o m c .0 c -o ° m e o o " a ea) c c " o � 0oN � 20TOm co -o � � Com � aoomc° ° `� °� m c y p m _ .r y Vt r2 co m O Y tq w 3 p tpj m r 0 7 C "' C m 00 L C CO > C C O a E co c`CC cCyC ' O O cn = Q 0 0 C •�Cm O C 0 m ct r-O O m 6 C O =cis O CL H H U a. Y m .�. m U O co p y E yLEmNU & o -5 con cx � � Uo `� � � � 3cQ � mmc —>p Cy Y m = m t m y r 0 O coOff• as O Co � ' w ° O N CL m ° 7 3crN4) (n y rU � �Dc � - 0 rL p � a3oUasas o Y m O C 0 'p 7 O c O U :,, p Y j �- m ° m C Y C y •.. « N m 0 0 -O O C C .0. Co Q> Q C U C ` 0 m �r > a O O i m Y o o > > n 'C C >_ a O m O m > m m *' o C 0 ° V m to m 7 0 E ° E p p m m a � O � zwUww ¢ � ¢ oUw � � Sac � � ocnc� a � ¢ � aaoa� � c3aaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaa aaaaaav Vaaa '�j • o OrNM � I[omt` MOO r NMst• InwNco OOrNM � lOfDhM Z In to IO totDIOInIt] ItocD CD t0wc0t0t0wt0 c09t` nn1` t` 10I� � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lachmem ! CL 20 ' g9 § � $ » ■ . :01 a . � . . $\ 0 . 0 0 . . ® f w E d n v % e © CL 8 CD f \ k t _ / / E ® a \ $ . . cisB ± Co • k f E E ' @ e � . 20 $ a CC % S f a t k . / ( EE e � f Rf6R0 se ƒ k92E .. E - cts � $ o cd a) e e § E * § a ECO cr� cr " � £ ■ # # kcn° fk2 ■ / . % @ m 0 . . . 2 § 0 2 § 7 § E 22# 2 $ § E § §CL � r cis /_ \ { ° k k % k � � a) $ — a) ca . � o ad 'a e (D . a) ca E & - � 2 = = � G . . � _ e - = - OQ ■ # ■ £ @ � � � k / - ! & o C6 0 _j / / / AO a- a.. a- a. a- aa- . « ' kG GwGI $ ■ mcq cmmmmm a �64b4Ji �f ��.r116 1 o r S N m CL E co 0 ¢ U Wm a v wig U v W � LLQ. C o O Q O � m c Ec 00 00 o` T a] M m coT Z o U Ch (C6 m C7 Ex T o 0 Z C a C r ca O Z U E U C O � C to .' `Z E2 0) = o a> W U N U O • —! a) W o Q . NZ C o a) ,r O O O • 2 m � v m CD «- ai m ca CO O O O` U m i dCL w m «. 3 (a a) C13 E NC > m m Em r °'o w o E m m ca E m c E IM o O > C d m O E c co ¢ • ` ca ?' C E m 0 W U o co w O co E v N N OCl a 7 0 Ci cis p U 3mZa) i r+ me > Q .O.. 0C t3 d 0 — O O • Q Qcc Q UU UU 6 t0 f� CD O) Z co co co co N N N N L p m x m N a `0 E W « 9m w � g 7 � O O O J Q F m c a m o � ; 0 UUUUU0000 00 O 0000 0000000000 O U O m Q > CD O m 0 w O Cl) ro C6 Q m N T (n N N m °a C1C) m o a) o. � M N fl. OD C'h j, i �+ E N Q W co co 17 CO CO N � CO ..- ) co T C Cn d coC6 E Co •j cn In O N cD 0 co d N W co � U (n Y m C U m to y c0 N W � N C W y 0 -0 O �O a C rn ` W N d r t m W Cu V •� C L to m .m. m O Co cp O � CO ° n Q T mM cu m Cu m m cnQ a W m v n o °0 m E3 " Cum :. co Uj co3 C6 .r _ O C U .L.. N N ... O a � w m a 3 � n � s Cf) Natio C C p � U —Op N p Co C.) m N cu m_ c y M M co M 'o o Co �- p O C C C 7 M p 3 O N tiJ T m 7 3 V m O m O CA V m ?i M X v) N Q E 0 N _ o co n E m N c E co c � � o c os co 'p �0 p CV O m CO � p 0 C N o cu m `p 0 C «. N i C y ; O p cD 0 Ca 70 o E 0 y CD C m _ i Cn M m U U 0) o V - w m C m Cb O E C` 7 '6 C COCD fA C2 O otS m C i m •- O O ... c0 D wCl) CD 3 y '- m � c � � o px0 WT '3 co [o " C Cmq m co V Y m m C 0 7 Co V U m m m N CA _ C O .� C p N C i O L •) p C C C_�0 C m m i C U E E C p o m 0 O Cu E +m' [~6 5 m CO C y cn 0 7 E 0 p C m m w «. m p L Q N 7 0 0 7 O 0 C c otf to ,� o m m E co p a: m c 0 cc �t1 m m E o E E as co o y m m U v c� c o o m Y m 3 c o 3 5 :- > m w W Q o m c ` m M a o c m -2 rn cn m m o c -p C CE m c > 5 W °� v 0 > v c E c wo — g L co m G m O O CD •� CCl C m Ci ` M 7 cl m CNC U w U f4 �= � +O. E V- «' p W C p C p O y M O m — : C 7 y m o m U m :� L z c O fo <C U co O o o O 'c w m y a CO O ... E m 0 c or-) 3 m mmt a' m c c m m 0 .E_ vi ° � o m to E C T o c a c E c m o m L E C9 N 0 •� °� Co C o E O « C`o m m E m C 0 O 91 E E c6 m co m O «. Q 'p m Y t V 'p � M CL CD 0 c V U O m .--'.. w C 'O O M 7 'OC m CO C C Co C o o 0 ;�U. p o m p O` m C _ A m o yg m w 3 `nom m N o o C C cx a 3 r � CD *06 ° m E 3 o 0 CLmaw cv c E a ;d ;u o c o w C • ca oQ o m > co «- c cu y > E o a> c") c c Y L co Y c c �-C O T E cii p to m W m > CD 0 0 a O CG co ca m o CV x 0 3 CL 0 0 � tC m m t(j O w arwxd CDF- wraQ 0) U- ) W3: ) M - UOaa0a � a UULL LL LL = TUU UU U VaLLa LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL L3 rn0,ilool'tC) cr) 0) 0)0) M aa)io 0 0000 000)01 r � � I _ N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M co M M M M M M M M Attachment ! / kms $ § Am k 70 . \ $ kms fEaooOo o 2 � � 2 � o . ca k E . k 9 Uin = ca c6 ® f ° � � k k c \ » - = § J 3 Go k23 E @ fe0 CL / 0 % CL § o o � � qCL e (D ¥ \m -0 CL 5 0 (D ® @ . g_ j k j k0 L6 a) '0 k0 ■ � $ # r- m 2 0 . a n e = � _ . . 0) 5 / 0- 7 , E e 7 � . E 2 W 0. . a e k \ E e 7 / C § CD . - \ \ a2 m2 § 2 — % c 0 3 . _ ¥ r . N c ■ § 0 / na E ) 2 e — e CL I I k 7 � r & > & 0 co c CD@ CD EmCeJ § ° <cl . J ° k $ r $ . ¥ � / c � cq � £ . , � 31LU3 / / fn � / 22u- u- U. u- a 22 A q • � � � o & m � QQQq d mco L o x 2 2 = 2 = 2 N � a 00 u E Co w tu0 0 LL O O J Q Im W F m c < m o y E C UUUUU UUU00000 0000000 U 0 O Oo 0 vi cD U 06 co > O c 2) M 0 0 c ° c " U U 'r? cts 0 CD 'a CDa m O «. c r U ..i c t O C Or p C C F 00 U ^ 0 0 E Z �' co ul W O O �_ O O 0 > r 0) ed = D y 7 a) i O = r O W m m N C tT J O m c co �' C E D o m W rj � ° m 8 L O U t O N U r i Z cr) N L U U m L U Ca a O C O 0 c w cli •• nEmr QV oOL•Uyc. 0rm m can ar • m re _.Vi. a' .mc. ° ` cCD m c� .o N O O cj O m _N°C 0m ocOcm°O CIS Ur O o 0flOD O m M V yNy CL It 17 CCI O CO am — N E m O 7 > o � 0 a) > mca Z o � i > U r °0 mcr, os 3 0aN OCU CL p ° O mmm � 0a cm0 U m •cm � d m U c i = O O 2m N c iz CLE O L m Cn m No0 0 ° ° cco EE o c C co a. o0U - v cQ c m ° y o ooam my � ` m a mc7m � ax co OL ° aoo o :30 a oa co a o c c c m m y c�°a v o o m r m m m '� c m rn � a�mio � cmi .-= corn 0awEL 0ENr00m .. 0m 0gym owN � � 0co �a SuaS o ri (D Enol a� o " a • `� c .�. O .. c Q «. c CO c N m O O M m Z m O y 7 C E — E m 0 cd 0 °' m y m m c6 E c c'cr, � c m 2 0 c�mo m � E m � m L _ m `a) ° Cl) ° m w m 0 O C V O U co m c cn v w a 3 �' c cn r 00 0 o c at a "a — _ ,o c • m m U N (A E m m 0 0 0 c m to 3 M ., a j O c U 3 Y C p d 0 la t [6 .. = m m 0 L y O co V a Cr) E O c .. O :. O C m L '0 m o a to 'm «, ., N m N m m m v Co '- m « U m to icx m m oa mU m .0 as cam m O E o m cr ° o c a) E m ° E c m > ca V •� 7 7 a E m '- ° t� �c w Ca m o d tl 3 m Em m ° mm � c°� CDCO1000 myami ° cNnmaim0mo =' mr °o °oc • ° OaU � w � oCaaa: a: cc aw � n. aoZ) cnUm0 ° QC � 0 < 0 � a o0000 0000000 0aaaa > j0 00 0 00in � / aUUUU OL) UUUUUU U UU U UU • o to CO 1' O O O r N CO It 10 CO f., CO O O r N 1(� CO f� pp Cn 0 2 CN9 CNO CNO M co cN m cm CMO (m Cm m cm M M CMO m m cn A co Cv M M r Ccc D% a a E o E cc e ' Y �c 2 Z. O O 0 J J Q Fm c Q m o y � c C) 000 000000 U O to Oi N U U W T W M y N Z `- M W U cm r y W > U W co W c J y W i7 W m otS m N Z co L o2S 7 C M m *' QCV) r W C N • N M C7 U r O r V M M U r i W N CO Ch rNj' O S , ZW m U rn C6 U V E W f6 O T M T T to 0 W W E m m W T W U O N w • U rn m m E V U m CD W C T E w > r c m W :Q E m U Wm % vmi n c cN» v W z rn m CM a Q a CO :3 CLm O p C C � 6 (D ,6 vE m '55 'j5 -6 (D mm E m m t m i m co c o a E m ., Com C C — mtm t V m O C > j O U _-O • m m ` O O CO ` CO > U > > EO'O O � m p M 0 0 c y i CO CO W W T m y to a` o f m C S U, m O m m «+ W -r- co d C CD 7 C p V C C E y 3 m =_ m • c •> i -- «. 0 0 ` p E N C E0 CD p O_ d CU L m m C m m - m • U O 3 cr,C O)�? m m VCo (D O E Q > ('3L = N 0 c •N Ucc TUU QU C m •— m C m U C T > CA -p U m a E :3 m cc2 a � m0 mQQ Cp O. -L4 m V •O m cE4 O p 9 N ami ami E O O 0cCC O m a N > 5 C v • CO 2 0 0 0 Q 2 a 2 W W W ' v 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0000- CLj00 3 000UU UUUaaaUU o iLcj.*, Md W COI, ODCnOrNM Z In to 1n t0 ccs to In CD CO CO CO M M M M M M M M M M M !� U o v r E c ;O0000UUU000000000000000000000000 ,'•rig. V p �:t. r •u. N N C T M T � a " T i� T °c it T a `: IL T a T N Wi r CL CV N cc rn co a r lw AD 6 Co W` lr L N a m nj r7 a: ca m i � T r Z. Ta y 0 c m N (U r Ewa r rT Q. ccH T _ 'J-: N M C O N a fi N r tm a ° o m d (L 'd' Q; c�i T m C G C a > C T v • W s p p ,_• E O m N m CQ co co m E m T N r v Cc a 'O X ' CL NM OT r 7 ma • W; N a �J C O m p as ,_ nj C CV L N D " U N N p N c�6 a '� L N O a U V w m 3r. 3 T-W 7ar O r Na. • cr O T ? EO � � >O r- 4 , N T cC � Y N O cm C N m E a. (L 'O m N rca x a c a U m E O N a O a N 5 CL N a m vi N m m Ucx Y5 X J m a 0 U E V N T a m w T 'V m T N 'X �j N N m C r p .m— Y = f0 a m m 'a cC m ' +- m 'aCL N > C m C a y > n- 0 0 .�- r C C _ p r L m � E lq 3 m = m i m m O N 3 N C U N m :� 3 C '-' ' .0 « •� 3 m f. O cc N "3 m t N Jr 'a •'- L" ji L ca '�- � m .r w O C U O m E `=r> Uao aom3 -- moo3 c0 0NaN0 G � Emcmi � E *Vj N o C CP,m 0 cis _c m c c C .m .c m m N m 'a '0 0 o m C N " o mLi � Cco cn o E -a o o c 0 n m O 'o Co co w 0p m m .. m o N � � m W _ CO 3 U .N-. N '7 0 0 c m V �o CL_ .m C m aJ ;C ..' •� G m m c m m 0) o ma - x � c � � va02! " c Elco °c ° cE -0 Tv` O m m m 3 O W C > :_ m i m O '- 0 m O OCO 0 a V5 0 G x 0 0 0 '0 m m Co7 aEi — 0 O N O m � = X 7 N m N L S N O O U .r N m L • >"i' C C > C N O 'a j 3 '►- O L L O +' m Ri '� Cm m N C ;''„'„ O `� L «. p 0 i p ,� m .r O i r +' " '� CJ > 3 '- RS m C m m O U :. m O p O N O 3 0 N :. '- O m C m s- m J > m N p p N L 3 V U N o L p L m U C i E O ..= p '.3 O i m . co m 3 U U_ l0 c0 U = C .0 co ' C E ca e E E 3 :: m `p .. c N m > ° 0 m o 3 y 3 Z 3 E 0 3 m : > L Cl y C m c c c a o m E L m m m o m C m m m 0 o w m ca m 3 x _3 - m .N O U .O +.' ++ G «. .. N C r. +' C C �: Q7 i m m m - d e. .O E m 0 3 7 U i. m 'a O O 0 N 3 3 0 O m m r C U. .� L C s. • "- CO p m m W C �. 3 'a. -3 d) m .i 0 3 C = +_' .0 m 7 0 w O C. C m Y Q ? 'a •O i U > > C 'C C m C C p = U cc O C C O > N C C to C L O «, a 7 U m m 0 CJ O O m 0 > O m 0 > i O O i m C 0 0 3 m O U p • .; ¢ Da ¢ 0DDUa0Uo[ U ¢ Ucco W a. o0 0w000) 0UmJ 06 ad 06 ad as ad ad ad ad ad 06 co co ca co co Go co 0 ad 0 06 ad aaaaa- aaaaaaaaaaaaan. an. aaaaaaaaaaa � o y � Lf) WINGpMOTNMd' 10cOf� GDMOTNM � 1n (Of� ODOOTNMd 1A r CO m CO CJ CO CO t` CD Q CC CD a OG O tT O O 0 m Z coca'MMMMMcoMMMMMMMMMMMcOMMMMMMMMMMMMM Afta�hmc-,7,g t m N G E ¢ v > m " m W C> v W W O Oi a co r c G m o y E c U U O o O V Old O T Q r N T E c6 cai W a m 3LU U J cl = O 111CD J c • Q m E C 0 m • • Q U - 3Q ca o U W _ C Q C O ca W E oQ � 0 = CEI E > L CF, m E ` -0 Co E o ,� 3 • w c o cm o co M c m CL O C N co • O m m m c0 c0 • E 3 ca CDc m ILca y N C c Ea m ° QDo a » > �� Pillamment � city of san Luis oBlspo GEL.Ozal plan annual RePORt 2005 For More Information Community Development Department offices are in the lower level of City Hall, which is downtown at the corner of Palm and Osos streets. Office hours are 8:00 am to 5:00 L'l pm, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. The location and mailing address are: 990 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401-3249 A few short-term parking spaces are available at the curb in front of the building and behind the building. Additional parking is available in a structure one block west on Palm Street. The department's main entry is wheelchair accessible, and there is a curbside, disabled parking space in front of the building. There are also wheelchair-accessible entries to City Hall's upper level and a disabled parking space behind the building, with access from Osos Street,but there is no elevator or indoor ramp between the levels of City Hall. Osos Street at Palm Street is a meeting point for local and county bus routes. Maps and publications may be viewed or purchased at the Community Development Department. Paper document purchase prices reflect only the cost of printing. Large documents are usually made available as "pdf' files at no cost through the City's Web site, or at nominal cost on CD's. Most items are also available for reference at the City- County Library across the street from City Hall, and at the Documents and Maps Section of the Cal Poly Library. The libraries generally have evening and Saturday hours. The department phone number is 805. 781-7172; the fax number is 805 781-7173. TDD 99i The City's Telecommunications Device for the Deaf number is 805 781-7410. Through the City's web site you can read or download the Digest General Plan and City regulations, learn more about City services, and check on some meeting — agendas and meeting updates. The Web site is http://www.slocity.org. Se puede hacer preparativos para traducir en espanol. / 3.5 L:\GP Annual Report\Annual Report(2005 2-23).doc pAQ6 40 SAN LUIS OBISPO Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 8, 2006 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Carlyn Christianson, Andrew Carter, Jason McCoy, and Chairperson Orval Osborne (with one vacancy) Absent: Commrs. Miller and Loh Staff: Community Development Director John Mandeville, Deputy Community Development Director Michael Draze, Associate Planner Michael Codron, Assistant City Attorney Christine Dietrick, and Recording Secretary Jill Francis ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Commissioners or staff may modify the order of items. The agenda was accepted as written. It was noted that Peter Brown would be sworn in as a new commissioner at the March 22nd meeting. MINUTES: Minutes of January 25, and February 8, 2006 The minutes of January 25, 2006 and February 8, 2006 were approved as submitted. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments made from the public.. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. General Plan Annual Report. Review of the 2005 annual report, and consideration of revisions to the growth management phasing schedule. Associate Planner Michael Codron presented the staff report, asking the.Commission to review the report and forward it with comments to the City Council. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Carter questioned staff on projected growth, expressed concern over the lack of affordable housing compared with commercial growth,. and presented the Commission with a resolution to address the imbalance between the commercial and residential growth rates. 3 Planning Commission Minutes March 8, 2006 Attachment 2 Page 2 Chairperson Osborne expressed concern over the non-residential (commercial) growth rate, noting that lack of residential zoning and large numbers of non-resident employees are very important issues. Commr. Christianson stated that commercial growth is not a concern, but affordable housing still is. Commr. McCoy voiced concerns that the city could become a bedroom community because of lack of jobs and affordable housing. On motion by Commr. Osborne recommend to the City Council to expand the intervals in the residential growth management phasing schedule from 3 years to 8 years. Seconded by Commr. Carter. AYES: Commrs. Osborne, Carter, McCoy and Christianson NOES: None ABSENT: Commrs. Miller and Loh ABSTAIN: None The motion carried on a' 4:0 vote. 2. Staff A. Agenda Forecast Deputy Director Michael Draze presented an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. He noted that because he is retiring from City employment;this will be his last meeting with the Planning Commission. 3. Commission ADJOURMENT: With no further business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled for Wednesday March 22, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street. Respectfully submitted by Jill Francis Recording Secretary S Attachment 3 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.88 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS Sections: 17.88.010 Purpose and justification. 17.88.020 Allocations. 17.88.030 Adjustments to allocations requested by property owners. 17.88.040 Periodic city council review and consideration of revisions. 17.88.010 Purpose and justification. A. The regulations codified in this chapter are intended to assure that the rate of population growth will not exceed the city's ability to assimilate new residents and to provide municipal services, consistent with the maximum growth rates established in the general plan. Also, these regulations are to assure that those projects which best meet the city's objectives for affordable housing, infill development, open space protection, and provision of public facilities will be allowed to proceed with minimum delay. B. San Luis Obispo is a charter city, empowered to make and enforce all laws concerning municipal affairs, subject only to the limitations of the city charter and the constitution and laws of the state. Regulation of the rate of residential development is a reasonable extension of municipal authority to plan overall development, in furtherance of the public health, safety and general welfare. C. According to the general plan land use element, the city should achieve a maximum annual average population growth rate of one percent. The reserve of developable land within the city and the capacity of proposed annexations could sustain growth rates which would exceed the objectives of the general plan. D. General plan policies and the annexation-area phasing schedule required by these regulations reduce the likelihood that any property within the city might be deprived of reasonable development entitlements through the operation of these regulations. E. The growth rate policies of the general plan reflect the city's responsibility to accommodate a reasonable share of expected state and regional growth. F. To avoid further imbalance between the availability of jobs and of housing within the city, the general plan also manages expansion of growth-inducing activities. The burdens of growth management are not being placed solely on the residential sector, since it largely responds to demands caused by other sectors. G. Considering the likely levels of housing demand and construction throughout the housing market area, nearly coinciding with San Luis Obispo County,these regulations are not expected to affect the overall balance between housing supply and demand in the market area. These regulations will not impede and may help meet the needs of very low-, low- and moderate-income households. (Ord. 1459 § 3 (part), 2004: Ord. 1359 § 3 (part), 1999) 17.88.020 Allocations. A. The city council shall, by resolution, adopt a phasing schedule that allocates potential residential construction among annexation areas,consistent with the general plan and with these regulations. Printed from Folio Views Page 3 'S � Attachment 3 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code B. The limitations on residential development established by these regulations apply to new residential construction within certain areas that have been annexed to the city or that will be annexed to the city. Development in such areas is subject to development plans or specific plans, which shall contain provisions consistent with these regulations and with the phasing schedule. C. For locations which the phasing schedule shows as "allowed," allocations shall be implemented by the timing of issuance of building permits.. D. These regulations shall not limit the issuance of building permits for locations which the phasing schedule shows as having an "assumed"rate of construction. E. Dwellings affordable and enforceably restricted to residents with very low, low or moderate incomes, as defined in the city'.s general plan housing element, and new dwellings in the downtown core (C-D zone as shown in the most official zoning map) shall be exempt from these regulations. Enforceably restricted shall mean dwellings that are subject to deed restrictions, development agreements, or other legal mechanisms acceptable to the city to ensure long-term affordability, consistent with city affordable housing standards. In expansion areas, the overall number of units built must conform to the city-approved phasing plan. F. It shall not be necessary to have dwellings allocated for a particular time interval or location to process and approve applications for general plan amendment, zone change or other zoning approval, subdivision, or architectural review. (Ord. 1459 § 3 (part), 2004: Ord. 1359 § 3 (part), 1999) 17.88.030 Adjustments to allocations requested by property owners. Upon verified written request by each owner for whom the timing of property development would be affected by a proposed change (either hastened or delayed), the community development director may adjust the allocation of dwellings among expansion areas shown in the phasing.schedule, so long as the total number of dwellings for all expansion areas within an interval does not change. The director shall approve such requests upon determining that there would be no substantial difference in provision of affordable housing, necessary public facilities, or open space protection as a result of the adjustment. (Ord. 1459 § 3 (part), 2004: Ord. 1359 § 3 (part), 1999) 17.88.040 Periodic city council review and consideration of revisions. A. The community development department shall provide status updates to the city council concerning implementation of these regulations, coordinated with the annual report on the general plan. The status update will describe actual construction levels and any adjustments to allocations that have been approved by the director, and may include recommendations for revisions. B. Following consideration of the annual report, or at such other times as it deems appropriate, the city council may revise the phasing schedule. Such revisions shall be consistent with the general plan. City council approval shall be required to do any of the following: L. Change the total number of dwellings that may be permitted within an interval; 2. Change the number of dwellings assumed for demolition or infill development or small annexations, or allocated in total to expansion areas; 3. Reduce the number of dwellings previously allocated to a certain expansion area, when there is not verified written approval by each affected owner; 4. Shift the years covered by intervals. Printed from Folio Views �Pjage2 / J � Attachment 3 San Luis Obispo Municipal Code C. Before approving a revision, the city council must conduct a public hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be provided at least ten but not more than thirty days prior to the hearing, by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and by first-class mail to each owner of property potentially affected by a delay in building permit issuance as compared with the schedule in effect at that time. Owner information may be obtained from the county property assessment roll, or from other sources which the community development director determines will provide complete and current information. Failure of an owner or owners to receive notice shall not invalidate any duly adopted revision. D. For in-city development and for minor annexations, the annual report shall compare the actual number of permitted dwellings with the assumed rate of permit issuance. When the previously assumed number of in-city and small-annexation permitted dwellings exceeds those actually permitted, and expected to be permitted based on current trends and project processing, the city council shall consider revising the phasing schedule to make the difference available to the current phases of large annexations. E. If an annexation area does not fully use its allocation within the previously indicated interval,the city council shall consider assigning the unused potential to that same area in future intervals. It is the intent of this part to encourage completion of neighborhoods that have been started; provided, that doing so does not cause the allowed citywide growth rate to be exceeded; and further provided, that the allocations previously assigned to other annexation areas will not be reduced without the approval of the affected landowners. (Ord. 1459 § 3 (part), 2004: Ord. 1359 § 3 (part), 1999) Printed from Folio Views Page3 �. 5 q Attachment 3 RESOLUTION NO.9358(2002 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PHASING SCHEDULE WHEREAS,the City Council held a hearing on the proposed amendment on August 20, 2002; and WHEREAS,the Community Development Director has determined and the City Council hereby concurs that the proposedamendment is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act,because it has no potential for physical changes to the environment; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Residential Growth Management Regulations,specifically by: Encouraging the timely production of housing,including affordable housing; Allowing development consistent with land use designations, zoning, and approved development plans,and subject to availability of resources and services;and Maintaining a citywide population growth rate not exceeding an annual average of.one percent. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: The Residential Growth.Management Phasing Schedule,most recently amended March 6, 2001,by Resolution No.9161,is hereby amended as shown in the attached Exhibit A. On motion of Council Member Schwartz,seconded by Council Member Mulholland,and on the following roll call vote: Ayes: Council Members Mulholland, Schwartz,'and Mayor Settle Noes: None Absent: Council Member Ewan and Vice Mayor Mans the foregoing resolution was adopted this 20th day of August 2002. yor Allen K. - ATTBBT e Lee Pfi 'ty Cleric O R 9359 a Qm mm mem Attachment 3 3 a a go ` o000 ^!p So — _ c c c CL o maaP- mm � Fin N � $ $ _ e Z � = = ate C � Qma1 ° s F n, Q. CL 3?101 S m`a � l _ 'CO) O n m CD 0 Sp 40 CL 4 ndt ntaffAA N w $ $ m Q 0 0 0 1643 0 0 0 CD V4 � � 3 o con ocnn000000vZ X p g m O Cr a � am 40 u o Cn 8O-&ICn000800CL COio CA) CO3v S6 0 » ' n ? ('�qao CD OD oill O O O OO W agQl sa to c � m � = m � w � gm CL ° : 0 6 0 m s m o. na � ? fr"v o0000000 °� m � m OR 0 MCD 3 j j m � i c 0 000000N OD 0 OOOOoCM _ c -a .m GNO ONS O 000 N ZD a (� Attachment 4 Resolution No. (2005 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PHASING SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on April 18, 2006, for the purpose of considering a modification to the Residential Growth Management Phasing Schedule (Schedule); and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo held a public hearing to review the proposed Schedule and recommended its approval by consensus to the Council; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposed amendment to the Schedule will not cause a direct physical change in the environment, or cause a reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and WHEREAS, the proposed Schedule is consistent with the General Plan and the Residential Growth Management Regulations (SLOMC 17.88) because it allocates units to the City's major expansion areas to insure that the residential growth rate does not exceed I% during any three-year interval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of interested parties and the evaluation and recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, presented at said hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: Section 1. Amendment to Schedule. The Residential Growth Management Phasing Schedule is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 2 3 Attachment 4 Council Resolution No. (2006 Series) Page 2 Residential Growth Management Ordinance Phasing Schedule The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 18th day of April, 2006. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM:. Jonathan Lowell, City Attorney 3 Attachment 5 Land Use Element LU 1.10: Air Quality If measures proposed at the time this element was adopted, mitigation decided during project review, or other programs or incentives intended to offset significant air-quality impacts of growth prove to be ineffective, the City will amend this Land Use Element to reduce its development capacity and will encourage other jurisdictions to reduce theirs, so that air quality will not deteriorate unacceptably because of growth. The City would then consider raising planned capacities to previous levels only if measures effective in protecting air quality are carried out. LU 1.1 I: Growth Rates & Phasing LU 1.11.1: Overall Intent Growth rates should provide for the balanced evolution of the community and the gradual assimilation of new residents. Growth must be consistent with the City's ability to provide resources and services and with State and City requirements for protecting the environment, the economy, and open space. �' LU 1.11.2: Residential Growth Rate H 6.2.1 The City's housing supply shall grow no faster than one percent per year, averaged over a 36-month period, excluding dwellings affordable to residents with very low or low incomes as defined in the Housing Element. This rate of growth may continue so long as the City's basic service capacity is assured. Table 2 shows the approximate number of dwellings and residents which would result from the one percent maximum average annual growth rate over the planning period. LU 1.11.3: Phasing Residential Expansions Before a residential expansion area is developed, the City must have adopted a specific plan or a development plan for it. Such plans for residential expansion projects will provide for phased development, consistent with the population growth outlined in Table 2, and taking into account expected in-fill residential development within the 1994 City limits. Though the periods of development of the major residential expansion areas may overlap, the City prefers to complete one neighborhood before beginning another. The sequence of development of the major residential expansion areas will be decided based on the affordability of dwellings, and other public benefits, primarily open space. The area committing to development of the largest number of dwellings affordable to residents with very low, low, or moderate incomes would be developed first, with open space dedication or other public benefits used to decide the order if two or three areas offer substantially the same housing affordability. The anticipated intervals for the major expansion areas' development are: first area, 1997 - 2003; second area, 2004 2010; third area, 2011 - 2017. LU-16 deCeMMR 2004 - cfeneival plan Ncest- city of san Luis oBispo Attachment 4 a L X w a) N CA 0 0 0 CO O CO LO r CD O v Lp v O N r O COD M O N Ca r r C'7 O N F- O O N vi Ta NLV 00000ln T Z N ' r d O � O N O o CM 0 LO V O N O O COO 2O o m a r ' r N CO 0 •� •—y c r O O m v am m x CISCD CON � OiiiE L c c a o O m E 5 r ' r M r LOC7 w 0 01 C � m w E 0@ A C CA O C O w CD =Ea EcomE °' i N U E O a.m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO Lf) w r > E m W Cl) OD r CO N N CND c cmi 0 v C r r m o a a'v O U = r O (Dc '> E c m O = p 'O'.0 : .XCO .- 3 N : Z m � d E c Q 0OO00000O 00 O a) c >, m — � O � V' SCD O O cE p r r r M CD r CO C/) -0 O O0) > Zf� C.0LCjoOOO, COD `f' n (D m aOia c ' y o ' C7 Cr) o N� rna2NE m CM, U = m O Un Er.. 0) Oo_ N N M av 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O m m v U) y X E2 C d• T CO P r N 'Cr cr�6= to cis 0 C m o o - • 2 >. oa> Em N O is c c N E2ax) ccc N `O — cw 0r > IRTM 00 C"iuM'fOOtn CO CD o m c � o m r ' N r 0 0 m ,,.. a) t 0 3 E m q � 5 m O U ,C N c°O aa) E (D O Z y c a c m r d pOj > � a � v : E r C C O� O la O` _ o: - rn m CO W CO a) H c m c C as t t C c a O o Cd N t 3 O O m 0 CL y e a d a rn d O O as � m C .9 .-cm UCa Z x *0y 0 0 c o E Ca—0 t as ~ U mj0 C _ _ Ca c6 Ca 0 a o E• c = v p E 3 N C=0 V Cn i m CD m y Ca v m . t6 m CD Ca i Ca L .. O n c 0 « _IM 6 c O = Q �2 O C E m O O v Ca CA m u7 m @ ur m y m m m ami d ami m °� C�a v� c (a CD 75CM 75 — 'o Ca a " U s E E E = V m a) m CO033333 = CD 3c � U a CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) m > or _ wa a � CO Ca CIS ea is R m Ca C) CO CO .0 W Attachment 5 Land Use Element Table 2: Anticipated City Population Growth 60,000 54,900 51,200 47 300 49.1 50,000 00 52.200 42,500 j ®Approximate 40,000 Maximum Number 30,000 - 24,300 ! of Dwellings 23,300 20,000 20 t zJ1, 22,200 ❑Anticipated 10,000 Number of People - �1) 0 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 o Estimated urban reserve capacity: 57,700 (2) Notes: (1) Includes residents of group housing. (2) Includes Cal Poly campus residents,who are inside the urban reserve but who were outside the City limits in 1994. LU LIL4: Nonresidential Growth Rate Each year, the City Council will evaluate the actual increase in nonresidential floor area over the preceding five years. The Council shall consider establishing limits for the rate of nonresidential development if the increase in nonresidential floor area for any five- year period exceeds five percent,except that the fust 300,000 square-feet of nonresidential floor area constructed after 1994 shall be excluded from calculating the increase. Any limits so established shall not apply to: A) Changed operations or employment levels, or relocation or ownership change, of any business existing within the City at the time the limit is set; B) Additional nonresidential floor area within the downtown core (Figure 4); C) Public agencies; D) Manufacturing, light industrial, or research businesses. city of san Luis oBtspo- Geneizal plan bigest-decemBCR 2004 LU-17 Page 1 of 2 Allen Settle-8-Year Residential Phasn,b ' J From: <ANCARTER@aol.com> To: <asettle@slocity.org>,<cmulholland@slocity.org>,<jewan@slocity.org>,<dromero@slocity.org>, <khampian@slocity.org>,<pbrown@slocity.org>,<ahooper@slocity.org> Date: 4/16/2006 11:14 PM Subject: 8-Year Residential Phasing CC: <Igriffy@thetribunenews.com>,<pwilmore@slochamber.org> RECEIVED RED FILE APR 17 2006 MEETING AGENDA SLO CITY CLERK Dear Council: DATE qh& ITEM # P R 3 Although I am a member of your Planning ionCommission,I am writing as a private citizen. I thought I would give you some addital background as to why the Planning Commission is unanimously recommending that residential growth be measured over an eight-year time frame instead of the current three-year time frame. The 1994 General Plan called for a residential growth rate(in dwellings)of 1%per year and a commercial growth rate(in sq. ft.)of I%per year. In reality,from 1995 through 2005,we achieved the following: Residential Growth (gross)—0.71Wyear '® COUNCILCDD DIR 'E CAO f?FIN DIR Commercial Growth (gross)— 1.77%/year Z ACAO @FIRE CHIEF ATTORNEY In PW DIR CLERK/ORIG 4 POLICE CHF ❑ DEPT HEADS REC DIR Residential Growth (net of affordable units)—0.60%/year UTIL DIR 10 � HR DIR Commercial Growth (net of first 300,000 sq. ft.)—1.47%/year `p C Since 1995,on either a gross basis or a net basis,there has been two-and-a-half times as much commercial growth in San Luis Obispo as residential growth. This is exacerbating the jobs/housing imbalance. Commercial growth has taken place faster than the General Plan anticipated. Residential growth has taken place slower. And the residential growth which has taken place has led to less population growth than the General Plan expected,due to smaller households. One of the ways the City controls residential growth is through a three-year phasing schedule. This ties to LUE 1.11.2 which measures residential growth over a three-year time span. There is no such phasing schedule for commercial growth,and commercial growth is measured over a five-year time span. (LUE 1.114) file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\slouser\Local%2OSettings\Temp\GW}000O1.HTM 4/17/2006 Page 2 of 2 Despite higher than anticipated commercta,growth,City Council has,on several occasions,uecided not to impose commercial growth constraints. The desire being to allow commercial growth in order to secure additional sales tax and TOT revenues and to maintain the City's position as the County's retail and commercial"hub." In point of fact,because of lack of residential building activity,the three-year residential phasing schedule has rarely come into play. Much of the residential growth envisioned in the General Plan is to occur in the Margarita and Orcutt expansion areas,and development in those areas has been repeatedly delayed in the planning process. Development in the Margarita area is finally about to begin. We hope the Orcutt area will come soon behind. In addition, there are large projects coming on line which the General Plan never envisioned. The Four Creeks project,for instance. It is the Planning Commissions desire that these housing projects not be delayed any further. This will happen if we stick with our current three-year phasing. By allowing eight-year phasing,we would allow residential growth to catch back up to what was originally intended in the General Plan. We would also help reduce the jobs/housing balance. The Planning Commission picked eight years because Community Development staff told us this was the"typical"economic cycle for housing development. In fact,one could argue the cycle is much longer in San Luis Obispo for major residential projects like the Margarita Area and the Orcutt Area. In picking eight years,the Planning Commission also noted that commercial growth in San Luis Obispo is measured over a five-time frame even though the planning hurdles for commercial development in San Luis are often smaller than for residential development. For instance, in the Airport Area,the City has allowed commercial development and annexation by individual landowners in advance of a specific plan. But in the Orcutt and Margarita Areas,the City has required individual property owners to come together,develop a specific plan,and then approach the City collectively to request annexation and residential development. I urge you to direct staff to bring back to the Planning Commission and ultimately to you, with all due speed,an amendment to the LUE which would allow residential growth to be measured on an eight-year time frame. This would allow Community Development staff to begin using eight-year residential phasing. This will make sure we don't delay any further the significant housing developments about to come on line. We need that housing sooner,not later. Sincerely, Andrew Carter 1283 Woodside Drive San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 805-235-0015 ancarter@aol.com file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\slouser\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}OOOOI.HTM 4/17/2006