Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/06/2008, C2 - NOMINATION OF CONTRIBUTING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1052 ISLAY STREET TO THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC RES counck C I T Y OF SAN LUIS O B I S P O FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director Prepared By: James David, Planning Technicianft""'- SUBJECT: NOMINATION OF CONTRIBUTING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1052 ISLAY STREET TO THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. CAO RECOMNIIlENLDATION: As recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), adopt a resolution adding the property at 1052 Islay Street to the City's Master List of Historic Resources. DISCUSSION Background The property owners of 1052 Islay (Attachment 1, Vicinity Map) have requested that their property be added to the Master List of Historic Resources. Historic designation as either a Master List or a Contributing property requires a public hearing before the CHC, nomination to the City Council and Council approval. If the property is added to the Master List, the applicants have indicated they intend to apply for a Mills Act Historic Preservation Contract. To qualify for the Mills Act program, the property must be on the Master List of Historic Resources. o c Ai iy llliir Islay Street elevation before rehabilitation Islay Street elevation after rehabilitation C2a- I Council Agenda Report=Master List Nomination, 1052 Islay Page 2 Site Data Applicants/Property Owners: Michael and Sharon Singleton Zoning: R-3-H General Plan: Medium-High Density Residential Site Area: 6900 square feet Site Description: Level site with one three bedroom house and a detached five bay garage.The site is bordered by Medium Density and Medium-High Density residential development on three sides. Architectural/Historical Background The property is located one block south of Mitchell Park and two blocks north of San Luis Obispo's Train Depot in the Old Town Historic District. The building's exact age is unknown, but is estimated to have been built sometime prior to 1915. The house is described as an excellent example of a Neo-Classic Rowhouse, an architectural style popular in San Luis Obispo from 1895 to 1915. The Neo-Classic Rowhouse displays similarities to preceding popular architectural styles: Queen Anne Cottage and Classic Box. Prominent architectural features can include: a one-story house on a raised foundation; hipped roof with dormer window; flat trim window frames; narrow clapboard siding; front and rear porches recessed to one side; side bay windows, The Neo-Classic Rowhouse is typically a modest architectural style with comparatively less ornamentation than Victorian and Queen Anne style homes. However, the subject property is distinctive because of its architectural ornamentation along the front of the house: Doric columns and detailed wood railing enclosed in the recessed front porch, fish scale shingles in the gabled roof end, detailed molding surrounding the front door's large beveled glass window, and detailing in the top sash of the front window. The property includes a three-bedroom unit and a five-bay garage which crosses the western property line and is shared with the adjoining property to the west. Also, there is a driveway easement that runs along the west property line to allow access to the garages and a rear unit on the adjoining property. The applicant reported that the property has not been modified since it was built, with the exception of a laundry room added to the rear of the house sometime after 1926. The house and many of its former residents have several ties to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company (SPRR), which heavily influenced the development of San Luis Obispo at the end of the 19th Century and the early 2e century. Notable residents include Charles J. Gates, a conductor for the SPRR, James A. Leavitt, engineer for the SPRR, and Dr. Howard B. Kirtland, San Luis Obispo City Councilman who served from 1916 to 1921. Mr. Kirtland was also involved in the Santa Lucia Chapter of Boy Scouts, the Masonic Lodge, the Elks Lodge, the Chamber of Commerce and the American Red Cross Chapter. Also, several members of the Kaufman family resided at the property from 1931 to June 2007, which was longer than any of the previous occupants. Albert Kaufman was an engineer for the SPRR, and his wife, Mary, was CC�L' C�_ � I Council Agenda Report—Master List Nomination, 1052 Islay Page 3 the president of The Monday Club and the Ladies Aid Society. Both Albert and Mary were considered active members of the City. Due to Albert and Mary Kaufman's involvement in the City of San Luis Obispo, the applicant has requested that the property be referred to as the historic "Kaufman House" if the property is added to the Master List. Historic Listing Process The process for historic listing involves several steps. Any person may request that a property be added to the Master List of Historical Resources or the Contributing Properties List. The CHC, Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission or City Council may also initiate listing. The CHC then reviews the request to determine whether it merits formal consideration. If the CHC finds a property merits consideration, a public hearing is scheduled and the applicant and property owner are notified. In evaluating a property's eligibility for the Master or Contributing Properties List, the CHC uses Council-adopted criteria (Attachment 5). Criteria for listing include: architectural significance (style, design, age, and architect); association with important person or event; or environmental context or role as a community landmark. Consideration shall include the architectural integrity, context and condition of the structure. If the CHC finds the property meets one or more of the eligibility criteria it forwards a recommendation to the City Council, who makes the final decision on historic designation. In making these decisions, the City Council considers the CHC's recommendations, public testimony and supporting documentation. The Council's action is then final and if the property is designated historic, its historic status and legal description are recorded with the County recorder. Types of Historic Resources There are two types of historic resources in San Luis Obispo. Individual buildings that have significant historic or architectural value are called "Master List Properties". These are the most unique and or important historic resources and merit special recognition and protection. A property may be listed as a Master List property if it meets any of the criteria in Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. The second type of historic resource is the "Contributing Property". The Contributing Properties List consists of about 500 properties that contribute to the architectural and historical character of the neighborhoods in which they are located. A Contributing Property is defined as a structure "built before 1941 that has retained its original architectural style and when viewed in the context of its surroundings, contributes to the historic character of the area" (City Council Resolution No. 6424 (1988 Series). While most contributing properties are located within historic districts, the CHC and the City Council have determined they may be located anywhere in the City if they meet the above criteria. Effects of Historic Listine Once properties are added to the Master List, they are eligible to receive and display a historic plaque and to participate in the Mills Act Historic Preservation Program. Exterior site and ca - 3 I Council Agenda Report_Master List Nomination, 1052 Islay Page 4 building changes are possible, provided that such changes promote the structure's original architectural style and character. Significant site and architectural changes are referred to the CHC to determine whether the changes are consistent with City standards and to meet CEQA requirements. Eligibility of 1052 Islay Street for historic nomination The property merits Master List historic designation based on architectural style, design, age, environmental design continuity, and historical associations. Although the architect for the structure is unknown, the structure presents a purity of style and has maintained significant integrity from the original structure. Specifically, the subject property meets the following eligibility criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: Criteria I.Style: The structure has been restored and has maintained the purity of style and the structure's integrity. Criteria II.Architectural-Design: The structure is well maintained, visually appealing, and the applicant has already begun restoration efforts to restore the residence. Criteria III.Architectural-Age: The structure could be found to qualify since it was built around 1910 and is relatively old in the context of Anglo-American history in San Luis Obispo. Criteria V. Environmental Design Continuity: The project is in a highly visible location of the Old Town Historic District and reflects and reinforces the unique"rowhouse" visual character and setting of this part of town. Criteria VI. Historical-Person: Notable past residents could be considered to have made significant contributions to the City through their association with government, the railroad or civic groups (Howard Kirtland, Charles Gates, James Leavitt, and Albert and Mary Kaufman). Criteria VIII.Historical-Context: The property serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, and the structure occupies its original site. A more detailed discussion of the project's ability to meet historic preservation criteria is contained in the attached Cultural Heritage Committee staff report (Attachment 2). Advisory Body Recommendation At its March 24, 2008 meeting, the CHC held a public hearing on the property owners' request to add their single-family home at 1052 Islay to the Master List of Historic Resources. The ca - � Council Agenda Report—Master List Nomination, 1052 Islay Page 5 Committee voted 7-0 to determine the property meets Historic Preservation Program Guidelines for listing on the Master List of Historic Resources (Attachment 2, Meeting Minutes) and recommended the City Council add the property to the Master List as the historic "Kaufman House" and remove it from the Contributing Properties List. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the agreement will not have any significant fiscal impact. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue the item for additional analysis or research. 2. Deny the nomination of contributing property located at 1052 Islay Street to the Master List of Historic Resources. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map 2. CHC Staff Report, March 24, 2008 3. CHC Meeting Update,March 24, 2008 4. CHC Historic Inventory 5. Historical Preservation Program Guidelines (Appendix C),Historic Resource Criteria 6. Draft Council Resolution COUNCIL READING FILE Applicant's Historical Documentation and Photos G:\CD-PLAMIDAVID\CHC Master LisACHC 27-08(1052Islay)—Council �►�� _,� . tai Attacbment CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT ITEM# BY: Jeff Hook, Senior Pla MEETING DATE: March 24, 2008 Edgar Gutierrez, Planntern FROM: Kim Murry, Deputy Director, Long-Range Planning PROJECT ADDRESS: 1052 Islay Street SUBJECT: Consideration of request to nominate a Contributing Property to the Master List of Historic Resources; R-3-H zone; Leeanne Singleton, Applicant. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council add the property located at 1052 Islay Street to the Master List of Historic Resources and remove it from the Contributing Properties List. BACKGROUND The applicant has requested that her property be added to the Master List of Historic Resources. The property is already on the Contributing Properties List and located in the Old Town Historic District. As explained below, historic designation as either a Master List or a Contributing property requires a public hearing before the CHC, nomination to the City Council and Council approval. Tonight's meeting satisfies the public hearing requirement. If the property is added to the Master List, the applicant has indicated she intends to apply for a Mills Act Historic Preservation Contract. To qualify for the Mills Act program, the property must be on the Master List of Historic Resources. _ _ r e , _ S lr Islay Street, before rehabilitation Islay Street elevation after rehabilitation Attachment CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 2 DISCUSSION Historic Listing Process The process for historic listing involves several steps. Any person may request that a property be added to the Master List of Historical Resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission or the City Council may also initiate listing. The CHC then holds a public hearing to determine if the property meets eligibility criteria for historic listing. In evaluating a property's eligibility for listing, the CHC uses city- adopted criteria. If, at a public hearing, the CHC finds the property meets one or more of the eligibility criteria, it forwards a recommendation to the Council which makes the final decision on historic designation. In making these decisions, Council considers the CRC's recommendations and findings, public testimony, and supporting documentation. Council's action is final, and if the property is designated historic, its historic status and legal description are recorded with the County of San Luis Obispo Recorder's Office. Alternatively, the CHC may determine, based on the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, that the property does not merit a change in its historic designation and take no further action; or may continue the item for further discussion or information. If the CHC determines the property does not meet eligibility criteria for nomination to the Master List, it should cite findings explaining why the property does not meet the eligibility criteria. The Committee's determination is final unless appealed to the City Council. Architectural Descriation The applicant provided historic background on the house (Attachment 1). The historic documentation summarizes the structure's design, style, and context, along with a timeline of past residents of the property and their occupations. The property is located on the 1000 block of Islay Street; one block south of Mitchell Park and two blocks north of San Luis Obispo's Train Depot. The building's exact age is unknown, but is estimated to have been built sometime prior to 1915. The applicant believes the house was built around 1910. According to a 1926 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, the house and the garages were present by that time, but not shown in the 1903 Sanborn map. According to the Grant Title, the property was created through annexation and subdivision of the Dallidet Vineyard property in 1876. The house is described as an excellent example of a Neo-Classic Rowhouse, an architectural style popular in San Luis Obispo from 1895 to 1915. The Neo-Classic Rowhouse displays similarities to preceding popular architectural styles — Queen Anne Cottage and Classic Box. As shown in Attachment 13, prominent architectural features can include: a one-story house on a raised foundation; hipped roof with dormer window; flat trim window frames; narrow clapboard siding; front and rear porches recessed to one side; side bay windows. Also, the Neo-Classic Rowhouse is typically a modest architectural style with comparatively less ornamentationthan Q l.� O Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 3 Victorian and Queen Anne style homes. However, the property does have architectural ornamentation along the front of the house — Doric columns and detailed wood railing enclosed in the recessed front porch, fishscale shingles in the gabled roof end, detailed molding surrounding the front door's large beveled glass window, and detailing in the top sash of the front window. The property includes a three-bedroom unit and a five-bay garage which crosses the western property line and is shared with the adjoining property to the west. Also, there is a driveway easement that runs along the west property line to allow access to the garages and a rear unit on the adjoining property. The applicant reported that the property has not been modified since it was built, with the exception of a laundry room added to the rear of the house sometime after 1926. Historic Associations The house and many of its former residents have several ties to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company (SPRR), which heavily influenced the development of San Luis Obispo at end of the 19" Century and the early twentieth century. Notable residents of the property include Charles J. Gates, a conductor for the SPRR, James A. Leavitt, engineer for the SPRR, and Howard B. Kirtland, San Luis Obispo City Councilman who served from 1916 to 1921. Mr. Kirtland was also involved in the Santa Lucia Chapter of Boy Scouts, the Masonic Lodge, the Elks Lodge, the Chamber of Commerce and the American Red Cross Chapter. Also, several members of the Kaufman family resided at the property from 1931 to June 2007, which was longer than any of the previous occupants. Albert Kaufman was an engineer for the SPRR, and his wife, Mary, was the president of The Monday Club and the Ladies Aid Society. Both Albert and Mary were considered active members of the City. Due to Albert and Mary Kaufman's involvement in the City of San Luis Obispo, the applicant has requested that the property be referred to as the historic "Kaufman House" if the property is added to the Master List. Types of Historic Resources There are two types of historic resources in San Luis Obispo. Individual buildings that have significant historic or architectural value are called "Master List Properties." These are the most unique and or important historic resources and merit special recognition and protection. A property may be listed as a Master List property if it meets any of the criteria in Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. Criteria for listing include: architectural significance(style, design, age, architect), association with important person or event, or environmental context or role as a community landmark. Consideration shall include the architectural integrity, context and condition of the structure. The second type of historic resource is the "Contributing Property." This property is already designated as such. A Contributing Property is defined as a structure "built before 1941 that has retained its original architectural style and when viewed in the context of its surroundings, contributes to the historic character of the area." (City Council Resolution No. 6424 (1988 Series). Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 4 Effects of Historic Listing Once properties are added to the Contributing Properties or Master List, physical changes to the property are possible, provided that such changes promote the structure's original architectural style and character. Significant exterior architectural changes are referred to the Cultural Heritage Committee to determine whether the changes are consistent with City standards and to meet CEQA requirements. Under either list, the property is deemed historically significant pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Demolition, reconstruction, or relocation of historically significant structures may be considered a significant adverse environmental impact. Significant adverse impacts can be avoided if the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995, Weeks and Grimmer) are followed. Eligibility of 1052 Islav Street for historic nomination Following are the pertinent Historic Resource Criteria for Building Evaluation, followed by staff analysis (in italics) of each category. To qualify for the Master List, the property must meet at least one of the criteria: Architectural Criteria I. Style Describes form of building such as size, structural shape and details within that form (i.e. arrangement of windows and doors,ornamentation,etc.) Building style will be evaluated as a measure of. 1. The relative purity of a traditional style (as compared to building styles in San Luis Obispo); 2. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects a once popular style 3. Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community;and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together 4. The degree to which the structure has maintained its integrity (i.e., assessment of alterations and structural condition, if known). Staff Analysis: The applicant's property meets the criteria for listing based on purity of style and the maintenance of structure's integrity. The structure is considered a representation of a unique style- Neo-Colonial Rowhouse — a style popular from the end of the nineteenth century until about 1915. During the summer of 2007, the property underwent several interior and exterior improvements. Measures were taken to restore the house to its original C,a- 1 Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 5 condition and maintaining the historic architectural details of the house. The applicant has also reported that the property will undergo further improvements, which will not affect the architectural style. Future projects include fixing the concrete in the driveway and rear parking area, replacement of front yard landscaping, and the addition of trees from the City's "Master Tree List" along the street parkway strip. H. Design Describes the architectural concept of structure and quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect(i.e., carpenter-builder)accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building Design will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness, artistic merit, details and craftsmanship; 2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though not necessarily unique; 3. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. Staff Analysis: The structure presents attractive aesthetic appeal with craftsmen elements, a detailed pediment area with fishscale paneling on the gabled roof, clapboard siding, Doric porch columns, window trims, and a well maintained exterior. The applicant has already completed most improvements for the structure to improve the attractiveness and aesthetic value of the structure. III. Age 1. Age is a measure of how relatively old a structure is in the context of the history of San Luis Obispo, primarily Anglo-American history(circa 1850). StalE Analysis: According to the applicant, the structure was completed around 1910, a timeframe when many other historically designated properties in San Luis Obispo were built. With the structure almost over 100 years old, there is an interesting link to the past where unique structures were built prior to the more recent suburban tract development pattern which began in the 1940s. V. Environmental Design Continuity Describes the inter-relationship of structures and their relationship to a common environment. Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship,and visual character of a street, neighborhood,or area. Environmental design continuity will be evaluated as a measure of the: ° Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 6 1. Symbolic importance of a structure to the community and the degree to which it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (i.e. easily accessible to the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place). 2. Compatibility of a structure with neighboring structures in its setting on the basis of period, style (form, height, roof lines), design elements, landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting. 3. Similarity to and/or compatibility of a structure with its neighboring structures which, collectively, although of no particular aesthetic value, combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive character. Staff Analysis: The property is within the Old Town Historic District, near Mitchell Park and the San Luis Obispo's Train Depot. The site is in a distinctive, tree-lined area of Islay Street with several other historic homes. The property does contribute to the character of the Old Town Historic District and to the unique environmental context of the block. VL History—Person Describes a person,group,organization,or institution that has been connected with the structure, either intimately or secondarily,for at least two generations(i.e. 40 years). Historical person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: 1. Significant to the community as a public leader(i.e. mayor,congressman,etc.)or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition—locally,regionally, or nationally. 2. Significant to the community as a public servant who has made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to important local affairs or institutions (i.e. councilmen, educators, medical professionals,clergymen,railroad officials). 3. Contributions which, though minor, directly or indirectly, had a beneficial effect on the community (i.e. firemen, law enforcement officers, postal workers, businessmen/shopkeepers, city employees,etc.). Staff Analysis: As discussed in more detail in the above historical/architectural data discussion, the applicant provided biographical information on past residents of the property's contributions to the local community. This information could qualify the property for historic listing based on the above criteria, through the property's association with a former City Councilman, leaders of community civic groups, and with the Southern Pacific Railroad. VIII. History—Context Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical,educational,governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historical context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: 1. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historical effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building(i.e. County Museum).A r% f ✓� J Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 7 2. Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the building(i.e. Park Hotel) 3. Secondary patterns of local history but loosely associated with the building. Historical context will also be evaluated on the basis of: 4. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. Staff Analysis: The property serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company. The structure does occupy its original site. Summary The property appears to merit Master List historic listing based on the criteria of architectural style, design, age, environmental design continuity, and historical associations. Although the architect for the structure is unknown, the structure presents a purity of style and has maintained significant integrity from the original structure. Specifically, the property may meet the following eligibility criteria: 1. Criteria I. Style: The structure has been restored and has maintained the purity of style and the structure's integrity. 2. Criteria U. Architectural-Desisrt: The structure is well maintained, visually appealing, and the applicant has already begun restoration efforts to restore the residence. 3. Criteria III. Architectural-Age: The structure could be found to qualify since it was built around 1910 and is relatively old in the context of Anglo-American history in San Luis Obispo. 4. Criteria V. Environmental Design Continuity: The project is in a highly visible location of the Old Town Historic District and reflects and reinforces the unique "rowhouse" visual character and setting of this part of town. 5. Criteria VI. Historical-Person: Notable past residents could be considered to have made significant contributions to the City through their association with government, the railroad or civic groups (Howard Kirtland, Charles, Gates, James Leavitt, and Albert and Mary Kaufman) 6. Criteria VIII. Historical-Context: The property serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company. The structure does occupy its original site. �a� �3 Attachment 2 CHC Agenda Report, 1052 Islay Street Page 8 If the Committee feels there is sufficient information to merit historic designation,it should make specific findings documenting the basis for historic documentation, identify an appropriate historic name which reflects the property's most prominent resident and forward a recommendation to the City Council for historic listing. Alternatively, the Committee may determine, based on the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines eligibility criteria for the Master List, the property does not merit historic designation and take no further action; or may continue the item for further discussion or information. If the Committee determines the property does not meet eligibility criteria for historic listing, its determination is final unless appealed to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council add the property located at 1052 Islay Street to the Master List of Historic Resources as the historic "Kaufman House" and remove it from the Contributing Properties List, subject to the following findings: 1. The structure is an excellent example of a Neo-Classic Rowhouse architectural style, and has been restored and its original architectural style and structural integrity have been maintained. 2. The property is located in a highly visible location of the Old Town Historic District and reflects and reinforces the unique "rowhouse" setting of that part of the City. 3. The property is associated with prominent citizens who have made significant contributions to the City through their association with government, the railroad or civic groups, namely: Howard Kirtland, Charles, Gates, James Leavitt, and Albert and Mary Kaufman. 4. The property serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company and occupies its original site. Alternatives 1. Determine that the property does not meet the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines eligibility criteria for Listing on the Master List of Historic Resources (List specific findings on why the property does not meet eligibility criteria). If the Committee takes this action, no recommendation need be forwarded to the City Council. The Committee's action is final unless appealed. 2. Continue the item for additional information or discussion. The Committee should list the specific information needed. CHC Meeting Update Attachment 3 March 24, 2008 Pag large fro nd side yard setbacks built with structures of v ectural expressions. 2. Conservation and Op Space program 3.6,2 indicates the City will participate in financial ce programs such as property tax reduction programs that a age mainten and restoration of historic properties. 3. Wit ation to the Master List of His Resources, the property located at 333 Mill Street has been recognized as a Iii c asset in the community. As such, maintaining the structure will meet the City's for historic preservation listed in policies 3.3.1 through 3.3.5 of the ConserVa ' and Open Space Element. Chairperson Breska returned to the meeting. 3. 1052 Islay Street. CHC 27-08; Request to add a contributing historic property in the Old Town Historic District to the Master List of Historic Resources; R-3-H zone; Leanne Singleton, applicant. Jeff Hook presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Committee recommend that the City Council add the property located at 1052 Islay Street to the Master List of Historic Resources and remove it from the Contributing Properties List. Leeanne Singleton, applicant, gave some history of the residence. Acting Chairperson Pavlik opened the public hearing and, hearing no public comment, closed the hearing. On a motion by Committee Member Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Fowler, the Committee voted 7.•0 to recommend that the City Council add the property located at 1052 Islay Street to the Master List of Historic Resources as the historic "Kaufman House', and remove it from the Contributing Properties List, subject to the following findings: Findings: 1. The structure is an excellent example of a Neo-Classic Row House architectural style, and has been restored and its original architectural style and structural integrity have been maintained. 2. The property is located in a highly visible location of the Old Town Historic District and reflects and reinforces the unique "row house"setting of that part of the City. 3. The property is associated with prominent citizens who have made significant contributions to the City through their association with,government, the railroad, or ® The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Please contact the City Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. Ca- �� CHC Meeting Update Attachment 3 March 24,2008 Page 4 civic groups, namely: Howard Kirtland, Charles Gates, James Leavitt, and Albert and Mary Kaufman. 4. The property serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company and occupies its original site. 4. 712, 72D.222 .728 736 48 Marsh Street & 1119 1123 1125 1127 1129 & 1137 Garden Street. - , Iscus Cultural Res _ ra EIR proposed for the Street Terraces Project; CD- H zone; Garden Street SLO Partners, applicant. Tyle Corey, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and recomm ed th the com ee take public testimony and provide input to City staff and EIR con ulf is on any adcxonal analysis or data needed to adequately evaluate environme al issue areas. BaPrice; Applied Earth Works, spoke about the methods used in a Cultural Resources s tion of the Draft EIR and responded to questions. C ole Florence, Oasis Associat spoke on behalf of the project applicant, along wi George Garcia, project architect, a d Robert Chattal, preservation architect. Chairperson Breska o ed the public hearing. Five citize spoke on the request, asking the Committee preserve Garden Street's d Garden Alley's historic character. Hearing no furth comment, she closed the blic hearing. Committee members then comme ed on the Draft R and took no action. 5. Review and discussion of cultu 1 reso ces oolicies and prograrnt in the Orcutt.Area Specific Plan and Dra E . ANNX/GP/R/SP 209-98; Barbara Parsons, applicant. Michael Codron, Associate Planner, p sented staff report recommending that the CHC should take the following action relative to the 'tem: 1. Receive a presentation on a Orcutt Area Specifi lan and discuss Section 2.5 of the Orcutt Area Specifi Plan and Section 4.5 of the raft EIR. 2. Continue consideratio of the item until the April me g for discussion and deliberation. (In Ap the CHC will be asked to provide sta with direction on any changes identified y the Committee that should be incorpor d into the Plan or EIR to insure co istency with the City's General Plan and Arche gical Resource Preservation idelines). Committee me tiers provided comments and continued its review of the i to the April 28th CH meeting. There was no public comment. ® e City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Please contact the City Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. ea -f �0 City of San Luis Obispo Attachment 4 c Reference No. . Name HOL.(_`( Photo No. Phone 67+1 al Direction °�' Date ' — Z _63 Parcel No. __. 7�-A� Time Spent -40 mi/1- Evaluation Score Reviewed by . :�A&TQA Evaluated by Location Map ARCI=CTURAL 1V0RKSHEET 1. 'Address �2 �`� 2. 'Building Shape: Rectangular' ✓ L-Shape Other 3. Stories: 1 _� 2 3 Other 4. Roof Shape: Gable Hipped Flat Gambrel False Front Bell Cast Hipped Other 5. Roof Pitch: Low Medium' High Flat Red Tile 6. Roof Material : Tile Builttm Conmosition [Gravel) Wood Shingle' Composition Shingle Other 7. Eaves: Close Projecting None � 8. Roof Trim: (a) Gable End: Projecting Roof Edge ✓ Cornice Bargeboard Parapet Mission Style Decorated (b) Special Features: Cupola Finial Gingerbread Widow's Walk Pendant. Ornaments Grill Work Pediment Gable Stickwork 9. Dormer: Gable Gable with Overhand Other 10. Siding: Clapboard Shiplap Shingle Plaster or Stucco Brick Other 11 . Window Shape: Rectangular Semicircular Top Round Oval Gothic Carved Bay 12. Window Surrounding Details: (a) Top: Plain Victorian Trim Shelf Molded Other (b) Sides: Plain ,��/ Molded Other Attachment 4 13. Window Opening: Double Hung. ✓ Casement Fixed Other 14. Other Window Details: Quarterfoile Stained Glass Queen Anne Mullions ✓ Other 15. Doorway Location: Center Off Center 16: Doorway Opening Shape: Flat ✓ Other 17. Doorway Type: 18. Door Glazing: Glass Etched or Frosted Stained Beveled 19. Door Surrounding Detail : Top: Plain Molding Victorian Trim Molded Trim Shelf ✓ Other Sides: Plain Molded Trim Other 20. Porch: Stoop Open " Closed Other 21 . . Additional Features: Chimney Tower or Turret Decorated Pediment Other 22. Ornamentation (Specify Location) : Spindle & S ool ✓ Gable Ornaments Stickwork Fishscaling aid Other 23. Architectural Style(s) : List predominant style and, if applicable, secondary styles NEo CotoNr/j-t_ . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24. Describe the present physical appearance of the structure in standard architectural terms. -rHE, i2GSiCSNCE A-1- 105Z 15 R 5A6Lf, 5Tor`4 WcxrO F '19n2� HousE v)tTH A R TffnlGu pL-PrN, "71-1E- Fool= is Hi ( WrTH A svyA . ,cs C9A-I3 �w '�i� i`2oNT . rCwt� Ho w, `�Fl 2Ea .is C'oYY; ^s�T�N sit �.1C `4 H e. ��T�+atc-. WP�u,5 r`;t•'-�„ Lc�J°�.��� tiN�TW; c.t�p>��� �;��C�• •. sm�c-�-w�N mow ,.-r-rN �►s✓a.'V�N Ts oaf' i 11-11 ►z si r�. �4ND' a Pc �!;1REIc f�-OoNT FaRG4 is o�lE- of 7HE� 6,A-5L� 'G1JD ia.C-:O '. I" "�H� pbg2H g,41L ,L'NG 'rU2NEG> WOOG> SU�FV0RTS. 73ir: !--�GF5 POUT L-� HUni� Wl,'1 ?�0V)S �Vr ToP gip:X4-1 H 5(Z 61;::7Hr / OWE i2 1�SH• 7�G �� t sK�!,v�S ovr-� -THF- V)/ -001/Js /fA)> 011 i r�aNT WinJ.CoW NA7:.> TRf�c�zc��j" air " � Up CoKIJr c>o! t-_i > A-r --HzIH? NOU` TNe7 1='OUIJt:P` -' C''CJ`%!��'7"'CJ/-�• C D^� City of San Luis Obispo Attachment 4 Reference No. Name Photo No. Phone 41 LZ Direction Date Parcel No. Time Spent Evaluation Score Reviewed by Evaluated by Location Asap ARCIIITE=AL 140USlII?17 /052 /.5 LA �/ .ST 1 . Address 2. Building Shape: Rectangular L-Shape Other 3. Stories: 1 2 3 Other 4: Roof Shape: Gable Hipped Flat Gambrel False Front Bell Cast Hipped Other 5. Roof Pitch: Low Medium High Flat Red Tile 6. Roof Material : Tile Builtim Comnosition_ (Gravel)_ Wood Shingle Composition Sliinp,le 1. Eaves : Close Projecting None S. Roof Trim: (a) Gable End: Projecting Roof Edge Cornice Bargeboard Parapet Mission Style Decorated (b) Special Features: Cupola Finial Gingerbread Widow's Walk Pendant Ornaments Grill Work Pediment Gable Stickwork 9. Dormer: Gable Gable with Overhand Other 10. Siding: Clapboard Shiplap Shingle Plaster or Stucco Brick Other 11 . Window Shape: Rectangular Semicircular Top Round Oval Gothic Carved Bay 12. Window Surrounding Details: (a) Top: Plain Victorian Trim Shelf Molded Other (b) Sides : Plain Molded Other Ca ^ �9 Attachment 4 13. Window Opening: Double Hung Casement Fixed Other 14. Other Window Details: Quarterfoile Stained Glass Queen Anne Mullions Other 15. Doorway Location: Center Off Center 16. Doorway Opening Shape: Flat Other 17. Doorway Type: 18. Door Glazing: Glass Etched or Frosted Stained Beveled 19. Door Surrounding Detail : Top: Plain Molding Victorian Trim Molded Trim Shelf. Other Sides: Plain Molded Trim Other 20. Porch: Stoop Open Closed Other 21 . Additional Features: Chimney Tower or Turret Decorated Pediment Other 22. Ornamentation (Specify Location) : Spindle & Spool Gable Ornaments Stickwork Fishscaling Other 23. Architectural Style(s) : List predominant style and, if applicable, condary st s IV Ir --roora . li3O lj a' 24. Describe the . en y 'c 1 appear n e 0 f the structure in standard architectural terms. __._._._�/_. � j7 ny�t�L�N-Trlr��✓`-.'1L'tlal (/'� —._�_11Y��—(+v,.__._ _._ ..__ _._.,_.._. Y � II•` ..r .i _ It � 555 ie•�,c; ♦. ��ii���l .•l4 �, Aii•e_'�•�s , I I • .. a 1 1�. � OO'* �=z < ,)Y .H ^,y z Attpchment 5 Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C. Procedures for adding properties to the Master List of Historic Resources 1. Who Can Apply Any person may request that a property be added to the Master List of Historic Resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee, Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission or the City Council mat also initiate an application. 2. Where and How to Apply A standard application form must be completed and submitted to the Community Development Department. The form must be accompanied by all available information that documents the historic importance and architectural character of the building or site. There is no fee for applying for Historic Resource designation. For information about data sources and help with preparing an application, contact the Cultural Heritage Committee. 3. Actions by the Cultural Heritage Committee The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) will review the application and decide whether it merits consideration. If the CHC finds that an application merits consideration, a public hearing will be scheduled and the applicant will be notified. The time, date and place of the public hearing will be advertised in the Telegram Tribune newspaper. At the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the hearing date, the CHC will recommend that the property be added or not added to the Master List of Historic Resources. When evaluating an application, the CHC will used the attached criteria. 4. Actions by the City Council Within sixty days from the CHC action on an application, the City Council will decide if the property should be added to the Master List of Historic Resources. These decisions will be made at an advertised public hearing. The applicant will be notified of the hearing date. In making these decisions, the City Council will consider the CHC's recommendations, public testimony and application materials. The action of the City Council is final. If the City Council approved the addition of a property to the Master List of Historic Resource, the City Clerk will send the applicant a copy of the council resolution that affirms this action. Ca- � 3 Attachment 5 Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee Delineation of Historic Resource Criteria for Building Evaluation and Recommendations Architectural Criteria L Style Describes form of building such as size, structural shape and details within that form (i.e. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.) Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. The relative purity of a traditional style (as compared to building styles in San Luis Obispo); 2. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects a once popular style 3. Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together 4. The degree to which the structure has. maintained its integrity (i.e., assessment of alterations and structural condition, if known). II. Design Describes the architectural concept of structure and quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect (i.e., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building Design will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness, artistic merit, details and craftsmanship; 2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though not necessarily unique; 3. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter- builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. III. Age Age is a measure of how relatively old a structure is in the context of the history of San Luis Obispo, primarily Anglo-American history (circa 1850). (See Scale of Building Age). Criteria for Building Evaluations IV. Architect Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the building design and plans of the structure. cza a`T Attachment 5 Historic Preservation Program'Guidelines: Appendix C The architect will be evaluated as a reference to: 1. A master architect (e.g. Wright) 2. A known architect who made significant contributions to the state or region (e.g. Julia Wright) 3. An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions to San Luis Obispo (e.g. Abrahams, who, according to local sources, designed the house at 810 Osos — Frank Avila's father's home — built between 1927- 30). 4. An early architect who is otherwise of no special significance but can be identified as a professional (e.g. pioneer architects of the region as confirmed by AIA archival membership records of California and the Central Coast). V. Environmental Design Continuity Describes the inter-relationship of structures and their relationship to a common environment. Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship, and visual character of a street, neighborhood, or area. Environmental design continuity will be evaluated as a measure of the: 1. Symbolic importance of a structure to the community and the degree to which it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (i.e. easily accessible to the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place). 2. Compatibility of a structure with neighboring structures in its setting on the basis of period, style (form_ , height, roof lines), design elements, landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting. 3. Similarity to and/or compatibility of a structure with its neighboring structures which, collectively, although of no particular aesthetic value, combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive character. Historic Criteria VI. History—Person Describes a person, group, organization, or institution that has been connected with the structure, either intimately or secondarily, for at least two generations (i.e. 40 years). Historic person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: 1. Significant to the community as a public leader (i.e. mayor, congressman, etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition—locally, regionally, or nationally. 2. Significant to the community as a public servant who has made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to important local affairs or institutions (i.e. councilmen, educators, medical professionals, clergymen, railroad officials). Attachment 5 Historic Preservation Piugram Guidelines: Appendix C 3. Contributions which, though minor, directly or indirectly, had a beneficial effect on the community (i.e. firemen, law enforcement officers, postal workers, businessmen/shopkeepers, city employees, etc.). VII. History— Event Associated with a social, political, economic, governmental, educational or other institutional event that has been important to the community. Historic event will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. A landmark, famous, or first-of-its-kind event for the city — regardless of whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city. 2. A relatively unique or interesting contribution to the city (i.e. the Ah Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American cultural activities in early San Luis Obispo history). 3. A contribution which, though minor, nonetheless was important to the community (i.e. local interest groups); or, alternatively, a unique or interesting contribution only loosely connected with the structure, object, site, or district. VIII. History—Context Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: 1. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building (i.e. County Museum). 2. Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the building (i.e. Park Hotel) 3. Secondary patterns of local history but loosely associated with the building. Historic context will also be evaluated on the basis of: 4. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. Attachment 6 RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2008 Series) ADDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1052 ISLAY STREET TO THE MASTER LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES AND REMOVING IT FROM THE LIST OF CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC RESOURCES. WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5197 establishing the "Master List of Historic Resources", and in 1986 adopted Resolution No. 6097 establishing historical preservation program guidelines, including procedures for adding properties to the listing; and WHEREAS, as provided by adopted procedures, the Cultural Heritage Committee held a public hearing on March 24, 2008 to consider a request by Leeanne Singleton, on behalf of Michael and Sharon Singleton, owners of 1052 Islay Street, to add said property to the Master List of Historic Resources; and WHEREAS, said property was being considered for historic status, in part, because of its architectural style, craftsmanship and aesthetic quality, and environmental design continuity with its neighborhood setting; and WHEREAS, at said meeting, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical documentation on the property and recommended that the City Council add the property to the Master List; and WHEREAS, this City Council considered this recommendation during an advertised public hearing on May 06, 2008, pursuant to historic preservation guidelines established by Council Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, documentation for the property on file in the Community Development Department, public testimony, the staff report, and on the City's Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, as follows: SECTION 1. Findings.The building located at 1052 Islay Street meets the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines criteria for historic listing as a Master List Property based on the following findings: 1. The structure is an excellent example of a Neo-Classic Row House architectural style, and has been restored and its original architectural style and structural integrity have been maintained. 2. The property is located in a highly visible location of the Old Town Historic District and reflects and reinforces the unique "rowhouse" setting of that part of the City. 3. The property is associated with prominent citizens who have made significant Ca. 4 I Attachment 6 contributions to the City through their association with government, the railroad, or civic groups, namely: Dr. Howard Kirtland, Charles Gates, James Leavitt, and Albert and Mary Kaufman. 4. The house serves as an example of structures in the Old Town Historic District which were home to many of San Luis Obispo's citizens that worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company and occupies its original site. SECTION 2. Addition to Master List of Historic Resources. The property and buildings located at 1052 Islay Street,to be known as 'The Kaufman House", are hereby added to the Master List of Historic Resources,based on historic documentation on file in the Community Development Department, as described in Exhibit A. SECTION 3. Environmental Determination. The City Council has determined that the above action does not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt from environmental review. SECTION 4. Publish Revised Master List of Historic Resources. The Community Development Director is hereby directed to amend the Master List of Historic Resources to include the property listed above and to publish a revised Inventory of Historic Resources for public distribution. SECTION 5. Recording of Historic Properties.The Community Development Director is hereby directed to record the property's historic designation with the County Recorder, pursuant to State Law. Upon motion of , seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing Resolution was adopted this 2008. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk C2 � 2� Attachment 8 APPROVED: Jon than Low , City Attorney Exhibit A: Legal Description of Historic Property ca - � Attachrnent 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HISTORIC PROPERTY Following is a legal description of the property added to the City of San Luis Obispo's Master List of Historic Resources, by City Council Resolution No. (2008 Series): 1. 1052 Islay Street. (Kaufman House) City of San Luis Obispo, Dallidet Addition, Block 172, Portion of Lots 16 to 18 (Assessor's Parcel Number (APN#) 003-544-016). Owners: Michael and Sharon Singelton. as - 3o