Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/20/2008, C2 - CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE NOMINATION OF PROPERTIES IN THE MONTEREY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE MA council 0 j Acjen6A nepont 9�- C I T Y OF S AN L U IS O B I S P O FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director Prepared By: Kevin Waldron, Planning Intern and Jeff Hook, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE NOMINATION OF PROPERTIES IN THE MONTEREY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE MASTER LIST AND CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES LIST OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES CAO RECOMMENDATION: As recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC),adopt a resolution adding 2243 Santa Ynez to the Master List of-the Historic Resources and adding the following properties to the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 285, 405, and 495 Buena Vista, 398 San Miguel, 2102, 2122, and 1160 Loomis. REPORT-IN-BRIEF As part of its 2005-2007 workprogram, the CHC has surveyed several neighborhoods for potential historic resources. These included the East Railroad District (off Johnson Avenue), "Little Italy" neighborhood (between Broad Street and the Railroad) and the Monterey Heights neighborhood. As a result of its work, the Committee identified eight properties that appear to meet eligibility criteria for historic listing -- one "Master List" property and seven "Contributing Properties." The property owners were notified in writing and invited to the CHC public hearing. At the CHC's April 28`t' public hearing, several property owners spoke in support of the proposed listing and no property owners opposed the proposed historic listing. The CHC's action was a recommendation to the City Council. Historic listing requires final action by the Council, followed by recording of the properties' historic status with the County Recorder. DISCUSSION Advisory Body Recommendation At its April 28, 2008 public hearing,the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC)voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council add seven properties to the Contributing Properties List and one property to the Master List of Historic Resources, as described in the meeting minutes, Attachment 2. Based on the properties' historic documentation, advisory body recommendations, and public testimony, the City Council should decide whether the properties meet eligibility criteria for inclusion on the Contributing Properties List or Master List. If Council concurs with the CHC's recommendation it should adopt the attached resolution, Attachment 1, adding the seven properties to the Contributing Properties List and one property to the Master List. CHC Historic Properties Noc.--..at'on I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 2 BACKGROUND R-1-S c/os-S R- S Situation R The CHC completed a historic survey and documentation for eleven properties in the Monterey Heights neighborhood, as described below. As provided in the R-, Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, historic listing ,s is a two-step process: 1) CHC nomination of the property '°' at a public hearing, and 2) a Council resolution adding the property to the Contributing Properties or Master List of `� Historic Resources. To qualify for historic listing, 2W properties must meet eligibility requirements listed in theme.=r?_?_IA"FF - Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. --=-'°�'��-+ANO- �\ OTS _S/ General Plan and Historic Resources VICINITY MAP I File No.94.04 A According to the CHC' s bylaws, historical research and Monterey Heights Neighborhood identification of properties with potential architectural or . historical significance are primary Committee duties. By identifying and preserving historic buildings, sites and districts, communities can help preserve " sense of place", continuity and enhance neighborhood quality. The General Plan Conservation and Open Space Element says: 3.3.1 Significant historic and architectural resources should be identified, preserved and rehabilitated. 3.6. 1 The City' s Cultural Heritage Committee will help identify and advise on suitable treatment for archaeological and historical resources, develop information on historical resources, foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources through means such as tours, a web site, identification plagues and awards, and provide recognition for preservation and restoration efforts. Purpose of the Historic Listing The purposes of the historic listing are to: 1) recognize buildings which contribute to the City' s architectural, cultural and historical diversity, 2) help preserve and restore buildings which are historically or architecturally significant, 3) to help preserve the historical character of neighborhoods, and 4) to make certain historic properties eligible for preservation incentives, such as rehabilitation .loans, tax incentives, or more flexible building or zoning codes. CHC Historic Survey In 1992, historical researcher Margaret Lovell compiled a report on the historical importance of numerous properties within the City. Monterey Heights was one of the neighborhoods identified as having potentially historic resources. The CHC is conducting a historic survey and updating the List of Historic Resources based, in part, on Lovell' s work. As directed by the Committee, staff surveyed properties in the Monterey Heights neighborhood and provided photo documentation, architectural/historical background and " chain of title" information for potentially historic properties. CHC Historic Properties NoL_ 'tion Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 3 The CHC reviewed preliminary property information on September 25, 2006 to determine if any properties in the Monterey Heights neighborhood met eligibility requirements for historic listing. The Committee identified eleven (11) properties that appeared to have architectural or historical significance and directed staff to provide detailed information on these properties. On April 28`x, the Committee reviewed the properties' age, architectural style, integrity, and chains of title. As a result of its evaluation, the Committee determined that eight properties met eligibility criteria for the Contributing Properties or Master List of Historic Resources, as listed in Attachment 4. One property was determined to be Potentially Contributing and two properties were determined to be ineligible for historic listing, mainly due to changes in the buildings' original architectural character. Types of Historic Listings There are,three types of historic listings in the City of San Luis Obispo: 1. "Master List Properties" are reserved for the most significant historic or architecturally valuable properties. In consideration for eligibility, properties shall meet any of the criteria as outlined in the Historic Preservation Program Guideline and should retain its architectural integrity, context and physical condition. Criteria for listing include: architectural significance (style, design, age, architect); association with important person or event; an environmental design context or role as a community landmark. 2. "Contributing Properties" are defined as a structure "built before 1941 that has retained its original architectural style, or essentially so, and when viewed in the context of its surroundings, contributes to the historic character of the area." (City Council Resolution No. 6424 (1988 Series) 3. "Potentially Contributing" properties are properties which may meet the Criteria for Historic Resource Designation, but require restoration or changes before they can meet eligibility criteria for historic listing. EVALUATION Monterey Heights Neighborhood: Historical and Environmental Design Context The neighborhood called "Monterey Heights" was subdivided in 1925 by Ralph Law and Joe A. Chaves. They contracted with MacRorie-McLaren Company, Landscape Engineers, San Francisco, to prepare subdivision plans for the new neighborhood. Monterey Heights was annexed to the City as part of the Phillips Addition in 1948. In designing the new neighborhood, MacRorie-McLaren Company used an innovative design approach, much different from conventional neighborhood designs elsewhere in the City. Their approach reflected a more "naturalistic" approach to creating neighborhoods, a movement pioneered by Landscape Architect Frederick Law Olmstead and popular in the 1920s and 1930s. The Monterey Heights neighborhood features pocket parks and curvilinear streets, a layout which deviated markedly from the traditional street grid patterns common at the time. MacRorie- McLaren also designed the landscaping for the University of California Berkeley football stadium in 1923 and the Westwood Park neighborhood in San Francisco in 1917. McLaren had immigrated to California in 1870 from Scotland to work for George Henry Howard, a � 7 CHC Historic Properties NoL ,Ation I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 4 trustee of the Bank of California who owned 6,500 acres on the peninsula south of San Francisco. McLaren is most notably recognized as the recipient of the Cornelius Amory Pugsley Silver Medal Award in 1935 "for his work in developing Golden Gate Park" in San Francisco. After Ralph Law and Joe A Chavez subdivided the area known as Monterey Heights, lots were originally sold to individuals with deed restrictions that included a "minimum" re-sale process and prohibition against minority purchasers. Residents in the � Monterey Heights neighborhood were relatively consistent in high socio-economic standing as many residents were most notably physicians, Cal Poly professors, and real estate and insurance brokers. In the late 1930's, WWII began to accelerate growth patterns in San Luis Obispo. After the war, Cal Poly enrollment "numbers tripled as veterans took advantage of the GI Bill and in the first five years after the war, the City grew by almost 50 percent," (Annexations & Subdivisions, 1943-1995). During this growth, the Monterey Heights neighborhood grew and was annexed into the City in 1948 and continued to provide for a growing Cal Poly faculty and veterans homestead. Property Recommended for Master List The following property appears to meet eligibility criteria for the Master List of Historic 'Resources as outlined in the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, Attachment 4. t 2243 's, Santa 1 Ynez t Views � _ from Xr Santa N` Ynez Street "L 3 ] b.• r Built in 1928, this Second Spanish Revival home features a low-pitched red tile roof with projecting eaves and exposed rafters. Most notably, the structure is made of alternating radiating bricks and intermixed with "clinker bricks", with leaded glass, rectangular and semi- circular molded and fixed windows. The off-center, plain recessed doorway is decorated with . �z-y CHC Historic Properties Noi.�,ation I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 5 a wrought iron frame. The use of clinker brick in exterior walls is distinctive and shows exceptional craftsmanship. History - Persons Paul and Mary Faulstich bought the property from Ralph Law in the 1928 and erected their home in 1928. Most notably, the Faulstich Brothers owned the local brick company located at the present day intersection of South Broad and Mutsuhito. Faulstich's ties with the brick yard provided access to the County's best masons and he appeared to have utilized this opportunity to construct his home. Paul and Mary Faulstich lived in this home from 1928- 1946 (18 years) until they sold to Frank F Dickey in 1946. Eligibility Analysis The following is the "Delineation of Historic Resource Criteria for Building Evaluation and Recommendations" from Appendix C of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, followed by staff analysis. To qualify for Master List, the property must meet at least one criterion. Based upon staff analysis and CHC evaluation, this property is nominated as a "Type 5" property (not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places but significant at a local level), to be known as "Faulstich House." Criteria for Building Evaluations Architectural Criteria II. Design Describes the architectural concept of structure and quality of'artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect (i.e., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building Design will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness, artistic merit, details and craftsmanship; 2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though not necessarily unique; 3. An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. Staff Analysis: 2243 Santa Ynez appears to meet Master List Eligibility Criterion II - Design, subsection 1. The house's masonry construction and craftsmanship show excellent and unique architectural features, artistic merit, and exceptional attractiveness. The house's quality of craftsmanship and attention to detail were due largely to the owner, Paul Faulstich, co-owner of the Faulstich Brothers Brick Company in San Luis CHC Historic Properties Non_ .dtion I Monterey Heights Neighborhood`' Page_6 Obispo. Staff has determined although there has been a detached garage addition, the addition was constructed in a sensitive way in order to compliment the style of the original structure and has also found no major alterations of the original structure which could detract from the original architectural integrity and style. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property is a beautiful contribution to the historic character of the Monterey Heights area and meets the Historic Preservations criteria for a Master List property. Properties Recommended for Contributing Listing Below are the properties that appear to meet eligibility criteria for inclusion in the Contributing Properties List based on their age, architectural design and integrity, and setting. 2102 Loomis: " The Zegar House" Architectural Description Built in 1931, this one-story Spanish Colonial Revival home features a medium-pitched red tile roof, a stucco exterior and a combination of fixed and double-hung arched and straight windows with divided lites and wrought iron decoration. This structure also features winged walls on the front facade with a semi-circular doorway with a wrought iron frame covering a glass doorway window. 4 .r ' 191 ' xc'`� ® � �,,. ..,•• ...rs' w Jv q n 2008 1930' s Loomis Street elevations History—Persons Ralph Law initially sold the property to Maurice and Marion Fitzgerald who then sold the property to Mr. and Mrs. Steve Zegar who retained the home from 1946-1978. The Fitzgerald' s occupations are not known, however according to historian Dan Krieger, Mr. Zegar was a taxi driver and is known to have had a connection with Hearst Castle by transporting Hollywood celebrities from the Anderson Hotel to the Castle. Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: The house was built before 1941 and appears to have retained most, but not all, of its original architectural character. As seen in the above photos, the driveway arch and the front patio wall have been changed. However, the C 2 -� 1 _\ I CHC Historic Properties Noi____.ation I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 7 architectural integrity, style, and design have essentially been retained and when viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 0 Historical Significance: In staff's opinion, while Mr. Zegar's association with Hearst Castle and the transportation of Hollywood celebrities from the Anderson Hotel is noteworthy, it does not appear to meet eligibility criteria for the Master List. 285 Buena Vista: "Maurice Fitzgerald House" Architectural Description This Tudor Revival/Storybook house is single-story house with a steeply-pitched gable roof and wood shingles. There are two small, decorated gables on the front elevation; the stucco siding is rough finished. The windows are mainly rectangular, some double- r _ hung. Some fixed pane windows have diamond-shaped divided lites. The front door features two large, decorative metal hinge straps. The raised front porch is enclosed within a gabled extension with a brick arcade opening. Additional features include two brick chimneys, ornamental windows and Canales (decorative tile vents) in the gable faces, use of quoins at the porch entry and half-timbering effects. This house is in excellent condition History - Persons Maurice and Marion Fitzgerald owned this home from 1934 to 1957. Mr. Fitzgerald was an insurance and real estate agent who also served as a Grand Knight of the Knights of Columbus. Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibilityfor the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: The house was built before 1941 and appears to have retained most, but not all, of its original architectural character. Staff has determined there has been a garage addition to the back of the property, and the second chimney located on the west elevation was removed due to a crack that compromised the structural integrity of the building. The construction of the structure meets eligibility criteria and has retained its original style, design and has maintained its architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 405 Buena Vista Architectural Description California Bungalow featuring a low-pitch, hipped roof, stretcher bond brick siding and CHC Historic Properties Nor,, ition I Monterey Heights Neighborhood' Page 8 projected eaves with exposed rafters. The windows are fixed and feature one sash with quadruplet side panel window face on an enclosed porch. History - Persons Ralph Law sold the lot to George E. Reed. Mr. Reed was a ` WWII veteran who received financing from the "California Veterans Welfare Act" established May 30, 1921. Reed owned the property with his wife Ethel until 1968. Mr. Reed's occupation has not been determined by staff. - Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: Staff has determined there have been no alterations to the structure which detract from the original architectural integrity. The structure was built before 1941 and meets contributing eligibility criteria and has retained its original style, design and has maintained its architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 495 Buena Vista Architectural Description Built in 1930, this L-shaped single-family residence is a one-story Spanish Colonial Revival style house with a stucco exterior. Design features include a low-pitched roof with red tile, canales and projected eaves with exposed rafters. The windows are multi-paned with a recessed front door and porch. History - Persons Ralph Law sold the lot to Jane Polhemus who built the house in 1930. Polhemus sold to Harvey Curtis; Curtis to Chester Loomis; Loomis to John Hyer; Hyer to Paul Pendleton. The current owners of the property are Ms. Lovejoy and Mr. Jeffrey Prostovich. tY: �I Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for the Contributing List of Historic CHC Historic Properties Non_.ation I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 9 Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: Staff has determined there have been no alterations to the structure which detract from the original architectural integrity. The structure was built before 1941 and meets contributing eligibility criteria and has retained its original style, design and has maintained its architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 398 San Miguel: "K.J. Hanak House" Architectural Description non San Mi�u _.__a .' r.-E[evarion.� _.. Built in 1930, this two-story Mediterranean/Mission Revival home features a low-pitched, red the gable and r{k, flat roof, with double hung and fixed divided lite windows, stucco exterior and canales. The structure features a diagonal staircase with carved balusters which crosses the front of the house. It is not clear whether the stairway is original or when it was built. ® History - Persons Early owners include general contractor K.J. Hanak, Fremont School principle J. Paul Hylton and his wife Evelyn, and Genevieve and Earl Wilcox. Mr. Wilcox was the foreman of Levy & Zenter wholesale produce. Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: Staff has determined there have been major alterations to the front facade of the structure as the stairwell does not contribute to the structures original architectural integrity. However, aside from the added stairwell, the structure itself has essentially retained its original style, design and has maintained its architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 2122 Loomis Architectural Description k' . Built in 1926, this Tudor Revival, two-story home features high peaked gable roofs with rectangular attic vents and .+ ,. stucco exterior. The street-facing, fixed, semi-circular and Y`,M, divided lite double hung window has been replaced since the 2006 preliminary survey. r History - Persons Evelyn and Marion Smith erected the house in 1926, one year after Ralph Law subdivided the Monterey Heights area. In 1930, Arthur A Sauer CHC Historic Properties Non._ltion I Monterey Heights Neighborhood` _- Page 10 purchased the home and lived there for 16 years, selling to Maurice and Mary Blu, Blu to Hakaru & Masako Taku, Talon to Gordon Mills in 1956 and Mills to Doris Greenelsh in 1959. Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for ' the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: The house was built ^� before 1941 and appears to have retained most, - but not all, of its original architectural character. The original picture divided lite window facing Loomis Street has been replaced with a single pane picture window, however in staff's view, this change does not significantly detract from the house's overall architectural integrity. The structure was built before 1941 and meets contributing eligibility criteria and has generally retained its original style, design and has maintained its architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. 2160 Loomis Architectural Description a Built in 1929, this Mediterranean/Spanish ' Colonial Revival features a parapet red tile roof, arcade type porch with a hipped, red tile roof, a Hollywood-type driveway, triplet fixed windows �f with true divided lites, and a rectangular vent at the top of the front porch tower. History - Persons Early residents include Kathryn Moore, and 5, \ Cecil & Alma Evans Eligibility Analysis: The property appears to meet the following eligibility for the Contributing List of Historic Resources: 0 Architectural Significance: There do not appear to have been any alterations that detract from the house's original architectural integrity. The structure was built before 1941 and has retained its original style, design and architectural integrity. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property contributes to the historic character of the area. The following property is recommended as "potentially contributing. This means that the property does not meet one or more eligibility criteria for historic listing, but with CHC Historic Properties No._,ation I Monterey Heights Neighborhood-J; Page I I modifications, could meet eligibility criteria for historic listing. Potentially Contributing 2190 Loomis Architectural Description Built in 1928, this Mediterranean/Spanish Colonial Revival style house features a flat red tile roof with rectangular fixed, double hung and casement windows. Rectangular vents and decorative tiles above the front porch add character to the style of the one-story house and two- story detached garage. However, due to weathering and the poor condition of some exterior walls, the property does not appear to contribute effectively to the neighborhood's historic character, as required under the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines. With rehabilitation, this property may be eligible in the future. History - Persons In 1930, Evabelle Long-Fuller purchased this property and erected a house and sold to a gentleman and his wife, H C & Neva Grundell. The Grundells lived at this residence from 1938-1977. t .S r. giblY.w ' t ? �.., Eligibility Analysis: The property does not appear eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resources, but may be "potentially Contributing" as noted: 0 Architectural Significance: The CHC determined the front residence facing Loomis Street does meet the eligibility criteria for historic listing because the structure itself has essentially retained its original style, design and architectural integrity. However, the condition of the rear garage with studio unit on top appears to have condition issues and does not meet eligibility criteria for Contributing Property listing. The following properties do not appear to meet eligibility criteria for historic listing: CHC Historic Properties Non__ tion I Monterey Heights Neighborhood Page 12 Properties Not Recommended for Listing 2140 Loomis Architectural Description Built in 1928, this one-story California Bungalow features a low-pitched gable roof with overhanging eaves. The stucco exterior walls feature triplet windows with true divided lites. However, due to building alterations over time, the architectural ` style has not retained its original character as constructed in 1928. History - Persons In 1928, J W & Mabel Thompson bought the property from Ralph Law and erected a house and took residence from 1928-1960. Eligibility Analysis: The Committee determined the property did not fl appear to be eligible for the Contributing List of Historic Resources because it has undergone significant alterations to the original structure that .: detract from its architectural integrity. Specifically, ` exterior walls have been treated with a rough stucco f ,, coat, and two original windows along the visible, - driveway-side of the house replaced with horizontal aluminum sliders. Although the structure was built before 1941, it has not retained its original style or r character. When viewed in the context of its surroundings, this property does not contribute to the neighborhood's historic character of the area. 326 Santa Maria Architectural Description Built in 1927, this Spanish Colonial Revival home is in good condition and features a low-pitched roof with original red tile and no eave overhang. - Windows are horizontal sliders with one, three- _ section fixed window on the front. The house sits a r well above the street level and is reached by a brick :�. stairway lined with decorative wrought iron railing. History - Persons Early residents include the first owner in 1927, .2 1a2 CHC Historic Properties Nor,__ .ation [ Monterey Heights Neighborhood/ Page 13 Eugene & Florence Gratton who owned the View from Santa Maria Anderson Barbershop and Beauty Parlor located at 953 Monterey Street. Gratton sold to J. B. Butler and then to Earl Pugh in 1939, who remained the owner until this past year. Eligibility Analysis: _ The Committee determined the property did not t appear to be eligible for the Contributing List of ;. Historic Resources because original double hung windows have been replaced with contemporary slider windows that detract from the original architectural style and integrity of the house. Effects of Historic Listing Master List properties are eligible to receive a historic plaque commemorating the historic name and date of the building. Some of these properties are also eligible for State or Federal historic designation, and may qualify for tax incentives such as the Mills Act Program. Once a property is added to the Master List, exterior building changes are possible, provided that such changes promote the structure's original architectural style and character. Demolition is also possible, subject to Architectural Review Commission approval. According to the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, demolition of an historical resource should be done only when: " 1) the condition of the building poses a threat to the health, safety or welfare of community residents or people living or working on or near the site, or 2) the project sponsor demonstrates that it financially infeasible to rehabilitate the structure or preserve the historic nature of the site." Contributing properties may also be eligible to display a historic plaque, although they are not eligible for the Mills Act program. Changes to contributing properties are allowed and require architectural or historical review to ensure that significant exterior changes maintain the building' s original character. Repainting, maintenance and repairs, interior and landscape changes are exempt from review. Contributing properties benefit from special " grandfather" status under Zoning rules which allows them to be rebuilt to their original condition after a fire or other damage, regardless of current setback, parking or other requirements. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do not adopt a resolution adding the candidate property to the Master List or Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources. 2. Continue the item for additional information or study, and specify the additional information or analysis needed. There is no mandated deadline for action on this item. Z'22 /3 CHC Historic Properties NOL—cation I Monterey Heights Neighborhooa J Page 14 ATTACHMENTS 1. CHC Minutes 2. Vicinity Map 3. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, Appendix C 4. Draft Resolution Council Reading File: 1. Chain of Title Research 2. Margaret Lovell Historic Information 3. Letter to Property Owners g/cd-plan/jhook/ccreport/car5-20-08montereyheights Draft CHC Minutes April 28, 2008 Attachment 1 Page 6 Kevin Waldron, planning intern, presented the staff report. Staff recommended the Committee recommend the City Council add 1)285, 405, and 495 Buena Vista, 398 San Miguel, 2102, 2122, 2160 Loomis, and 2243 Santa Ynez to the Contributing Properties List, 2) Determine that 2190 Loomis is Potentially Contributing, and 3) Determine that 2140 Loomis and 326 Santa Maria do not meet eligibility criteria for historic listing due to significant changes that have affected the properties original historical nature. He provided the Committee with the historical background on the area. He stated four reasons for the purpose of historic listing. He stated that staff did not know if Julia Morgan had a part of the construction of the 2102 Loomis house. i Jeff Hook, Senior Planner, explained that being on.:the Master List usually applies mostly to the exterior of the building. PUBLIC COMMENT Jeff Prostovich, San Luis Obispo, wanted to know if the property at 2102 Loomis was a Julia Morgan design. Sharon Lovejoy, San Luis Obispo,`stated-that she knows the owner at 326 Santa Maria and feels the house may have always had the same eaves as are on there now and would like to see more reearch done:., Star Jenkins, San Luis Obispo, he lives'at 285 Buena Vista, he stated that the insurance company found a crack on oneof the chimneys and therefore has been taken down recently. Bill Swanson,-2243Santa Ynez owner, he wanted to know what was included with being a part ofethe Master List. He stated that the house was do two lots and.wondered if in the.future the lot could be split if it was put on the Master List. There was_no-.further public comment. COMMITTEE COMMENTS Committee memberBreska, stated that she agrees with staffs recommendations on the property. Committee member Landwehr, Committee member Davis, she is in agreement with staffs recommendations. Committee member Crotser, stated that he feels 2243 Santa Ynez should be on the Master List. �z is Draft CHC Minutes April 28, 2008 Attachment 1 Page 7 On a motion by Committee Member Crotser and seconded by Committee member Miller,the Committee voted 7:0 to accept staff recommendations 1 to 3 with a change under recommendation 1 that property 2243 Santa Ynez be a Master List property. 5. Orcutt Area Specific Plan and EIR. SP/ER 209-98: Review and discussion of the Orcutt Area Specific Plan and Draft EIR; Barbara Parsons, applicant. (Michael Codron)(continued from March 24,2008) Michael Codron,Associate Planner, continued his presentation of the staff report. He stated the Orcutt Area Specific Plan (GASP)goal;policy and program. Staff recommends a survey be done to the trail areas-before the area is open to the public. Staff recommends the 1)CHC update the'draft OASP With a discussion of the historic significance of the Righetti Ranch House complex, 2.)to direct staff to incorporate a new policy into the OASP-that will reference Section 4.30 (Mitigation Methods—Avoidance)of the city'iW'cheological Resource Preservation Guidelines, and 3)add a policy to the specific plan to require consultation with tribal representatives as part of the,process to create an open space management plan for Righetti Hill. Staff met on-site,.with Fred Collins, Northern Chumash Tribal Council Spokesperson, on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 to receive his recommendations for the site. He recommended avoidance of archeological sites, view corridors to the hill top and information regarding the living history of Chumash settlers of the site. Tribal council meeting held on 4/26, staff is waiting for-additional'input from Fred Collins and members of the Tribal council meeting. Mr:Codron provided the Committee with historical background of the area, including information about.Jacob H. Orcutt. PUBLIC COMMENT 1 Andrew Merriam, Wallace Group, hopes to have walk ways and corridors to incorporate the overall character of the property. COMMITTEE COMMENTS Committee member Landwehr, stated that Jacob Orcutt's place used to be called Laurel Hill Far. She stated that as a connection to Mr. Orcutt it would be nice to plant Laurel trees on the property. On a motion by Committee member Crotser and seconded by Committee member Breska, the Committee voted 7:0 to 1)update the draft OASP with a discussion of the historic significance of the Righetti Ranch House complex, 2) to direct staff to incorporate a new policy into the OASP that will reference Section 4.30(Mitigation Methods—Avoidance)of the city's Archeological VICINITY MAP File No. 94=04_ a mom Historical Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C Attachment 3 C. Procedures for adding properties to the Master List of Historic Resources 1. Who Can Apply Any person mat request that a property be added to the Master List of Historical Resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee, Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission or the City Council may also initiate an application. 2. Where and How to Apply A standard application form must be completed and submitted to the Community Development Department. The form must be accompanied by all available information that documents the historical importance and architectural character of the building or site. There is no fee for applying for Historical Resource designation. For information about data sources and help with preparing an application, contact the Cultural Heritage Committee. 3. Actions by the Cultural Heritage Committee The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) will review the application and decide whether it merits consideration. If the CHC finds that an application merits consideration, a public hearing will be scheduled and the applicant will be notified. The time, date and place of the public hearing will be advertised in the Telegram Tribune newspaper. At the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the hearing date, the CHC will recommend that the property be added or not added to the Master List of Historical Resources. When evaluating an application, the CHC will used the attached criteria. 4. Actions by the City Council Within sixty days from the CHC action on an application, the City Council will decide if the property should be added to the Master List of Historical Resources. These decisions will be made at an advertised public hearing. The applicant will be notified of the hearing date. In making these decisions, the City Council will consider the CHC's recommendations, public testimony and application materials. The action of the City Council is final. If the City Council approved the addition of a property to the Master List of Historical Resource, the City Clerk will send the applicant a copy of the council resolution that affirms this action. Page 22 Attachment 3 Historical Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C City of San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee Delineation of Historic Resource Criteria for Building Evaluation and Recommendations Architectural Criteria I. Style Describes form of building such as size, structural shape and details within that form (i.e. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.) Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. The relative purity of a traditional style (as compared to building styles in San Luis Obispo); 2. Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects.a once popular style 3. Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together 4. The degree to which the structure has maintained its integrity (Le., assessment of alterations and structural condition, if known). II. Design Describes the architectural concept of structure and quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the 'individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or. combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the architect (i.e., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building Design will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its uniqueness, artistic merit, details and craftsmanship; 2. Overall attractiveness because of craftsmanship and aesthetic value, though not necessarily unique; 3. An expression of interesting details .and eclecticism among carpenter- builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. III. Age Age is a measure of how relatively old a structure is in the context of the history of San Luis Obispo, primarily Anglo-American history (circa 1850). (See Scale of Building Age). Criteria for Building Evaluations IV. Architect Page 23 Historical Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C Attachment3 Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the building design and plans of the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to: 1. A master architect(e.g. Wright) 2. A known architect who made significant contributions to the state or region (e.g. Julia Wright) 3. An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions to San Luis Obispo (e.g. Abrahams, who, according to local sources, designed the house at 810 Osos — Frank Avila's father's home — built between 1927- 30). 4. An early architect who is otherwise of no special significance but can be identified as a professional (e.g. pioneer architects of the region as confirmed by AIA archival membership records of California and the Central Coast). V. Environmental Design Continuity . Describes the inter-relationship of structures and their relationship to a common environment. Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship, and visual character of a street, neighborhood, or area. Environmental design continuity will be evaluated as a measure of the: 1. Symbolic importance of a structure to the community and the degree to which it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (i.e. easily accessible to the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place). 2. Compatibility of a structure with neighboring structures in its setting on the basis of period, style (form, height, roof lines), design elements, landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting. 3. Similarity to and/or compatibility of a structure with its neighboring structures which, collectively, although of no particular aesthetic value, combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive character. Historical Criteria Vl. History—Person Describes a person, group, organization, or institution that has been connected with the structure, either intimately or secondarily, for at least two generations (i.e. 40 years). Historical person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: 1. Significant to the community as a public leader (i.e. mayor, congressman, etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition — locally, regionally, or nationally. 2. Significant to the community as a public servant who has made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to important local affairs or institutions (i.e. councilmen, educators, medical professionals, clergymen, railroad officials). Page 24 azo Attachment 3 Historical Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendix C 3. Contributions which, though minor, directly or indirectly, had a beneficial effect on the community (i.e. firemen, law enforcement officers, postal workers, businessmen/shopkeepers, city employees, etc.). VII. History—Event Associated with a social, political, economic, governmental, educational or other institutional event that has been important to the community. Historical event will be evaluated as a measure of: 1. A landmark, famous, or first-of-its-kind event for the city — regardless of whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city. 2. A relatively unique or interesting contribution to the city (i.e. the Ah Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American cultural activities in early San Luis Obispo history). 3. A contribution which, though minor, nonetheless was important to the community (i.e. local interest groups); or, alternatively, a unique or interesting contribution only loosely connected with the structure, object, site, or district. VIII. History—Context Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historical context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: 1. Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historical effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building (i.e. County Museum). 2. Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the building (i.e. Park Hotel) 3. Secondary patterns of local history but loosely associated with the building. Historical context will also be evaluated on the basis of: 4. Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. Page 25 �fz- z/ 0 Attachment 4 RESOLUTION NO. (2008 SERIES) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING 2243 SANTA YNEZ TO THE MASTER LIST AND PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2859 4059 AND 495 BUENA VISTA, 398 SAN MIGUEL, 2102, 21229 AND 2160 LOOMIS TO THE CONTRIBUTING PROPERTIES LIST OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. WHEREAS, in 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5197 establishing the "Master List of Historic Resources" and "Contributing Properties List" (collectively referred to as "Historic Resources"), along with procedures for adding properties to the listing; and WHEREAS, on April 28, 2008 the Cultural Heritage Committee held a public hearing to consider recommending to the City Council the addition of eight properties in the City of San Luis Obispo to the Historic Resource List due to their historical and/or architectural significance to their neighborhood and to the community-, and WHEREAS, at said meetings, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical documentation on the property of 2243 Santa Ynez and recommended that the City Council add the said property to the Master List of Historic Resources; and WHEREAS, at said meetings, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed the historical documentation on the following properties and recommended that the City Council add these properties to the Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources: 1. 285,405, and 495 Buena Vista 2. 398 San Miguel 3. 2102,2122, and.2160 Loomis WHEREAS, this City Council considered this recommendation at an advertised public hearing on April 28, 2008 pursuant to historic preservation guidelines established by Council Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that based on the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation, documentation as described in the Historical Resource Inventory for each property, on file in the Community Development Department; public testimony, the staff report, and on the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines the following: SECTION 1. Addition to the Master List of Historic Resources. The property located at 2243 Santa Ynez has been found to meet the eligbility criteria for inclusion on the Master List of Historic Resources due to its unique design and exceptional masonry craftsmanship, and is hereby added to _ � c Resolution No. 'kz008 Series) Attachment 4 Page 2 the Master List of Historic Resources as a Type 5 property, and shall be designated as the historic "Faulstich House." SECTION 2. Addition to Contributing Properties List. The following properties have been found to contribute to the historic and architectural character of the City and to meet the criteria for inclusion on the Contributing Properties List due to their age, retention of original architectural character, and contribution to the architectural and historical character of the Monterey Heights neighborhood and are hereby deemed Contributing Properties: 4. 285,405, and 495 Buena Vista 5. 398 San Miguel 6. 2102, 2122, and 2160 Loomis SECTION 2. Environmental Determination. The City Council hereby determines that this action is not a "project" as defined in Article 20 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) since it does not have the potential for resulting in a physical change in the environment, and therefore, is not subject to environmental review requirements. SECTION 3. Publish Revised Contributing Properties List. The Community Development Director is hereby directed to amend the Contributing Properties and Master Lists to include the properties listed above and to publish revised historic resource listings for public distribution. SECTION 4. Recording of Historic Properties. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record the properties'historic designation with the County Recorder,pursuant to State Law. On motion of seconded by and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 20th day of May, 2008. Mayor David F. Romero Resolution No. k/-008 Series) Attachment 4 Page 3 . ATTEST: Audrey Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: nathan well, City Attorney �z-z�