HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/20/2008, - LONG TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attachment 2
LONG-TERM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Summary of Facility and Infrastructure
Improvements Through General Plan Build-Out
November 2008
city of San tUIS OBISPO
LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
November 2008
TABLE OF •
INTRODUCTION
Overview 1
Report Organization 2
Summary 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS BY FUNCTION
Public Safety 4
Police and Fire& Environmental Safety
Public Utilities 5
Water and Wastewater
Transportation 6
Streets 6
Creek&Flood Protection 7
Pedestrian&Bicycle Paths 7
Parking 9
Transit 9
Leisure,Cultural and Social Services 10
Parks &Recreation,Adobe Restoration and Public Art
Community Development 11
Open Space Protection and Trails
General Government 12
Information Technology and Buildings
Cost Summary by Function 12
city of San tUIS OBISPO
INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW
The purpose of this report is to assist the Council in developing goals for 2009-11 by presenting
a comprehensive but concise summary of the City's long-term capital improvement plan (CIP)
for facility, infrastructure, equipment and land costs needed to serve the City at build-out under
the adopted General Plan.
Provides a "menu" of possible "goal entrees." On one hand, this report provides valuable
background information for Council goal-setting, as we have always defined the purpose of the
City's budget process as asking ourselves: of the many goals, objectives and work programs set
forth in our long-term planning and policy documents, which are we going to focus on in the next
two years?
With this approach, the City's two-year budget process becomes our key tool in programming
the implementation of these plans and policies by allocating the resources necessary to do so.
And our "very long-term CIP" is one of the key "menus" of candidate "goal entrees" for the
Council to consider in setting goals for 2009-11.
But it does not reflect agreed-upon priorities: that's the purpose of the budget process. On the
other hand, as discussed in more detail below, this very long-term CIP is conceptual. And in
many cases, the projects have not undergone detailed analysis, nor undergone the rigor of the
public review process. As such, many of these projects may never emerge as high priorities —
regardless of our financial condition — and may undergo changes in scope or importance as new
challenges and issues emerge overtime.
Results Summary
Long-Term CIP By Function: $897.8 Million
As summarized in the "sidebar"
chart, these improvements total ■ Community o General
Development Government
$898 million, with transportation 3% 2%
improvements accounting for o Public Safety
about 70% of these costs. 5%
o Leisure,Cultural
Key Assumptions a Social
Services
14% o Transportation
The following are key 69%
■Public Utilities
assumptions underlying the costs ,opo
presented in this report:
1. New Facilities Only. These
costs only reflect new
improvements needed to
support General Plan build-out, based on current policies, plans and goals in place today.
Recurring, maintenance oriented-improvements, such as pavement maintenance, are not
reflected in these costs. While they are significant (the"Maintenance-Only CIP" prepared as
part of the 2007-12 General Fund fiscal forecast two years estimated that annual costs in the
General Fund alone to adequately maintain the facilities, infrastructure and equipment we
INTRODUCTION
already have in place is about $8 million), these are incurred to adequately maintain what we
already have in place today. This report focuses on the new facilities and infrastructure
needed to support the City at build-out.
2. Not Just for "New Development" The improvements presented in this report are not needed
just to support new development: in many cases, they address current deficiencies as well.
For example, we estimate that it will cost $21 million to underground overhead utilities. This
is driven by the development in place today.
3. Funding Sources. The costs presented in this report do not address funding sources. In
many cases, this will be the responsibility of new development. For example, under Parks
and Recreation, we estimate that the cost of meeting the need for parks for new development
(again, based on achieving the General Plan goal of 10 acres of park per 1,000 residents) is
about $93 million. However, it is the City's policy that new development is responsible for
this cost. Additionally, it is likely that grant sources will cover some of these costs,
especially in the transportation area. And many of these projects will be financed through
our enterprise funds, such as water, sewer and parking.
4. Priorities Yet to Be Set; and Needs Are Likely to Change Over Time. As noted above, this
"very long-term CIP" is conceptual. Its purpose is to provide a starting point for the Council
in the goal-setting process; it is not intended to represent an agreed-upon list of high-priority,
"must do" projects. In fact, this is the purpose of the City's goal-setting and budget process;
and as such, this summary is a resource—not an outcome. It is the beginning of our priority
setting process, not the destination itself. For this reason, many of these projects may never
emerge as high priorities — regardless of our financial condition — and may undergo changes
in scope or importance as new challenges and issues emerge overtime.
In short, this report focuses on presenting the "inventory" of improvements that may be needed
at some time in the future, as a starting point in the goal-setting process. Crafting funding
solutions for implementation based on Council priorities is the next step in the process, and an
integral part of the Financial Plan process. . . .
REPORT ORGANIZATION
Function Groupings. The report organizes CIP project into the six major functional areas used
in the City's Financial Plan:
Public Safety
Police Protection, Fire & Environmental Safety
Public Utilities
Water, Wastewater
Transportation
Streets, Pedestrian & Bicycle Paths, Creek & Flood Protection, Parking, Transit
-2-
a �-
� 1
INTRODUCTION
Leisure, Cultural and Social Services
Parks & Recreation, Adobe Restoration, Public Art
Community Development
Open Space Protection, Trails
General Government
Information Technology, Buildings
As noted above, this report is not intended to reflect priorities: that's the purpose of the goal-
setting and budget process that we are just now initiating for 2009-11. Its organization simply
groups similar projects together; and as such, the order in which they are presented does not
reflect their relative importance.
Goal and Policy Links. For each project, the report shows the "goal or policy link" that is the
basis for the project. In most cases, these links come directly from the General Plan. In others,
the link may be to an adopted master plan. For virtually all projects, there is a link to a major
policy document approved by the Council.
Costs: High Level Estimates. In most cases, costs are "order of magnitude, reconnaissance
level" estimates. Only in very few cases have we formally studied the project; and we have gone
to the design phase in even fewer. As such, these represent the staff's best assessment of costs
based on what we know today.
SUMMARY
In placing these projects in the context of the 2009-11 goal-setting and Financial Plan process,
these costs — even at a "high level" — provide an important starting place in assessing which of
these projects should be a high priority over the next two years, given its likely cost and our
fiscal outlook.
a-3
-3 -
1 F i
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Protection
Land Acquisition for New Police Headquarters Police Facilities MasterPlan 8,818,000
New Police Headquarters Facility Police Facilities MasterPlan 33,705,000
Total Police Protection 42,523,000
Fire and Environmental Safety
Equipment
Truck w/Equi merit Pending Fire MasterPlan 1,133,000
Squad/Ambulance P nding Fire Master Plan 221,300
MDC's:Truck-2, Squad-1, OES-271, E-6 Pending Fire MasterPlan 40,000
Technical/Heavy Rescue Response Vehicle Pending Fire Master Plan 100,000
Facilities
Securi /Perimeter Fencing Stations 2& E) Safety Element I 30,000
Instructional Facility& New Station Pending Fire Master Plan 2,500,000
Station 4 Addition Safety Element 300,000
Total Fire and Environmental Safety 4,324,300
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $ 46,847,300
-4- a-y
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description Plan or Policy Link cost
PUBL,IC UTILITIES
Water Services_
— -
Water Distribution
Telemetry System Irri rovernerits IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 890,000
Master Plan Implementation Water Master Plan, October 2000, 7,540,000
prepared by Boyle Engineering
Water Reuse Master Plan Implementation Water Reuse Master Plan, Sept. 2004 7,210,000
Prepared by Dudek and Assoc.
Total Water Service 15,640,000
Wastewater Services
Collection
Telemetry System Improvements IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 730,000
Calle Joaquin Lift Station Wastewater MasterPlan, Oct 2000 2,100,000
repared b Brown and Caldwell.
Silver City Lift Station Wastewater Master Plan, Oct 2000 250,000
prepared by Brown and Caldwell.
Treatment and Reclamation
Master Plan Implementation (plant Wastewater Master Plan, Oct 2000 42,600,000
improvements to meet General Plan pop) prepared by Brown and Caldwell.
Projected Treatment Requirements Improvements Estimated by Brown and Caldwell 4,100,000
Total Wastewater Service 49,780,000
TOTAL PUBLIC UTILITIES $ 65,420,000
1
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pject Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
TRANSPORTATON
Streets
New Roads
Prado Road: Broad to Hi uera Circulation Element A.1 21,000,000
Prado at Hi uera Intersection Margarita Area Specific Plan(MASP) 300,000
Prado Road: Hi uera to US 101 Circulation Element A.1, BA 6,000,000
Buckley Road: Extend from Vachell to Higuera Circulation Element A.3 4,200,000
Bullock Lane Extension to Tank Farm Road Circulation Element A.4 3,200,000
Sacramento Drive Extension Orcutt Road Circulation Element A.5 1,600,000.
Bishop Street Extension Across UPRR to Broad Circulation Element A.6 10,500,000
Santa Fe Rd: Realign s/o Tank Farm Road Circulation Element A.7, AASP 5,200,000
Santa Fe Rd: Connect with future Prado Rd Circulation Element A.7, MASP, Airport
Area Specific Plan (AASP) 1,500,000
Road Widenings
Hi uera Street-High to Marsh Circulation Element B.1 3,700,000
Orcutt Road -Broad to Johnson Circulation Element B.2 1,600,000
Orcutt Road- UPRR Crossin" Widening Circulation Element B.2 2,700,000
Tank Farm Road-S Hi uera to Broad Circulation Element B.3, AASP 5,750,000
South Hi uera- Madonna to Prado Road Circulation Element B.5 500,000
LOVR-Madonna to US 101 Circulation Element B.6 500,000
Santa Rosa Street-Olive to Foothill Road Circulation Element B.7 3,200,000
Santa Rosa Street at Foothill EB RT lane Circulation Element B.8(a) 1,100,000
Santa Rosa Street at Olive NB RT Lane Circulation Element B.8(b) 1,600,000
Santa Rosa Street at Walnut LT lanes Circulation Element B.8(c) 300,000
Santa Barbara Street: Upham to Broad Railroad District Plan 1,300,000
Santa Barbara Street: Leff to UphamRailroad District Plan 260,000
Broad Street: South Street to Alphonso Four Creeks EIR 1,100,000
Freeway Interchanges
Prado Road Interchange Circulation Element C.1 42,000,000
LOVR Interchange Circulation Element C:2 28,300,000
Route 101/HWY 1 Santa Rosa Circulation Element C.3 42,800,000
Broad Street/US 101 Ramp Modifications Circulation Element CA 1,600,000
Other Street Projects
Monterey Street: Santa Rosa to Grand Circulation Element D.1 15,700,000
Orcutt Road Grade Separation at UPRR Circulation Element D.2 21,000,000
Prefumo Canyon Road Landscaped median Circulation Element D.3 525,000
Broad Street Dogleg Circulation Element D.5 375,000
Guard Rail Upgrade and Replacement Safety Element 1,050,000
Congestion Relief Projects Circulation Element 5,225,000
Nei hborhood Traffic Management Circulation Element, LU 2.1.3. 850,000
Traffic Safety Mitigation Circulation Element 5,225,000
LOVR Landscaped Medians Circulation Element 2,100,000
Broad Street Landscaped Medians S of OrcuttAASP 2,625,000
Broad Street Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 2,100,000
Santa Rosa Street Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 1,575,000
Foothill Road Corridor Enhancement Circulation Element 1,575,000
Undergrounding of Overhead Utility Lines Circulation Element 21,000,000
City Assistance: Neighborhood Improvements Housing Element 7.3.3 5,225,000
Parker Street Improvements Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan 75,000
Brook Street Extension &Plaza Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan 225,000
Walker/Pacific Closure& Plaza Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan 225,000
6 g'J
PROJECT
s •
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
Traffic Signals, Street Lights & Signals
New Traffic Signals Circulation Element 2,625,000
Traffic Signal System Upgrade Circulation Element 775,000
Video Detect/Surveillance Circulation Element 1,050,000
Traffic Signal Communications Circulation Element 1,575,000
Downtown Pedestrian Level Street Lighting Circulation Element 2,400,000
New Street Lights $15,000 Per Year Circulation Element 325,000
Street Light Modifications/U pgrade Circulation Element 2,600,000
Downtown Pedestrian Signals Improvements Circulation Element 300,000
Billboard Removal Program Circulation Element 14.11 2,100,000
Acquire 975 Broad Street-,Extend SLO Creek Circulation Element 2,100,000
Path West of Nipomo
Crosswalk Lighting Systems Circulation Element 300,000
Street Lights at Crosswalks in Railroad District Railroad District Plan 100,000
Bridge Replacements
Prado Road: SLO Creek Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 4,700,000
California Avenue: SLO Creek Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 6,300,000
Johnson Avenue: SLO Creek Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 3,000,000
Chorro Street: Stenner Creek Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 2,700,000
Madonna:Prefumo Creek Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 1,450,000
Bianchi Lane:SLO Creek Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan 525,000
Calle Joaquin: Prefumo Creek I Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 1,775,000
MurrayStreet: Stenner Creek I Land Use Element 6.4.6E, OS 3.2.1 E 2,100,000
Total Streets 317,285,000
Creel and Flood Protection
Cuesta Park Detention Facility Waterway Management Plan 10,875,000
Mid-Higuera Bypass Channels Waterway Management Plan 5,300,000
Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan
Elks Lane Bypass Channels Waterway Management Plan 12,850,000
Channel Modifications near LOVR Waterway Management Plan 6,800,000
Creek Bank Stabilization Waterway Management Plan 31,800,000
Creek Bed Stabilization Waterway Management Plan 22,600,000
Remove man-made obstructions from creeks Land Use Element 6.5.1 C 5,225,000
Total Creek and Flood Protection 95,450,000
Pedestrian and.Bicycle Paths
Pedestrian
Complete Community Sidewalk System Circulation Element, Cl 5.1.2 18,254,000
Continue Program of Replacing Existing Curbs with
Handicapped Ramps Circulation Element, Cl 5.1.3 6,273,000
Repave Pedestrian Crossings and Install
Pedestrian Bulb-Outs Circulation Element 5.0.513. 523,000
Monterey Street Civic Center Plaza Installation Circulation Element 2,379,000
Garden Street Makeover Circulation Element DA 345,000
Complete Downtown Mission-Style Sidewalks Downtown Plan; Resolution No. 9114 4,600,000
RR District Boardwalks Railroad-District Plan 31.4,000
Leff and Osos Improvements Railroad District Plan 309,000
Walk of Histo West Side of Tracks Railroad District Plan 523,000.
-,-
a-q
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
Bicycle Paths
Bob Jones Trail Prado to LOVR 2007 Bike Plan 2,300,000
Prado Road Bike Bridges 2007 Bike Plan 523,000
Bob Jones Trail Elks to Prado 2007 Bike Plan 1,658,000
Bob Jones Trail Madonna to Elks 2007 Bike Plan 1,255,000
Elks Lane Parallel Bike Bride 2007 Bike Plan 366,000
Bob Jones Trail(Marsh to Madonna) 2007 Bike Plan, Mid-Higuera
Enhancement Plan 1,464,000
Madonna Road Underpass 2007 Bike Plan 157,000
Bob Jones Trail LOVR to Barn2007 Bike Plan 523,000
Prefumo Arm Calle Joaquin to Madonna 2007 Bike Plan 972,000
Madonna Road-Bridge toLa-una Park 2007 Bike Plan 1,673,000
Railroad Bike Path (Depot to Marsh 2007 Bike Plan 2,718,000
Railroad Bike Path Marsh to Hathwa 2007 Bike Plan 6,691,000
Railroad Bike Path (Hathway to Foothill 2007 Bike Plan 366,000
Railroad Bike Path. Foothill to Cam us 2007 Bike Plan 162,000
Railroad Bike Path Foothill Bridge 2007 Bike Plan 1,777,000
Path Along n/Orcutt to Laurel 2007 Bike Plan 136,000
Path Along Creek to Southwood 2007 Bike Plan 366,000
Railroad Bike Path Laurel to Tank Farm 2007 Bike Plan 1,150,000
Bridge Over Tank Farm Road 2007 Bike Plan 1,568,000
Bridge Over RR @ Fairview/Penny Ln 2007 Bike Plan, Railroad District Plan 2,091,000
Underpass at Industrial Way 2007 Bike Plan 732,000
Bridge from Sinsheimer Park to Lawrence Drive 2007 Bike Plan, Railroad District Plan 3,241,000
Railroad Bike Path Hi"hh to Roundhouse 2007 Bike Plan 240,000
RR Bike Path Roundhouse to McMillian 2007 Bike Plan 753,000
Acacia Creek BP Rockview to Damon-Garcia 2007 Bike Plan 627,000
Acacia Creek BP Damon-Garcia to Tank Farm 2007 Bike Plan;AASP 261,000
Acacia Creek Underpass @ SR 227 2007 Bike Plan 366,000
Union Oil Prop BP Tank Farm to Buckle 2007 Bike Plan; AASP 1,568,000
Buckley Road Path Broad to Vachell 2007 Bike Plan; AASP 3,450,000
Tank Farm Crk. BP(Tank Farm to Vachell 2007 Bike Plan; AASP 1,464,000
Morro Street BB Santa Barbara to Pismo 2007 Bike Plan 52,000
South Street Widening-for BP 2007 Bike Plan 52,000
Bikeslot at California-Foothill 2007 Bike Plan 162,000,
Bikeslot at South-Broad 2007 Bike Plan 142,000
Bikeslot at S.Hi uera-LOUR 2007 Bike Plan 209,000
Bike Path Flora to Fixlini 2007 Bike Plan 314,000
Laguna Lake Park to Foothill 2007 Bike Plan 1,673,000
Marsh Street Interchange Mods 2007 Bike Plan 314,000
South Hills Path (Margarita Area to Ex osition 2007 Bike Plan; MASP 1,568,000
Railroad Corridor Palm TreePlantin- Railroad District Plan 105,000
Total Pedestrian and Bicycle Paths 78,729,000
-8 -
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
Parkin
NARF Parking Access and Parking Management Plan 31,350,000
New Parking Structure 1 every 5 ears Access and Parking Management Plan 62,725,000
New Parking Lot Acquisition Access and Parking Management Plan 6,275,000
New Meter Installations- E/o Santa Rosa Access and Parking Management Plan 52,000
Residential Parking District Implementation Access and Parking Management Plan 209,000
Develop Downtown Park and Ride Lots Circulation Element 12.6, Access and 2,100,000
Parking Management Plan
Additional Passenger Loading Area Near Depot Railroad District Plan 105,000
Total Parking 102,816,000
Transit
Capital
Bus Stop Improvements Short Range Transit Plan 418,000
Bus Expansion 1 Every 3 Years Short Range Transit Plan 2,600,000
NARF:Transit Short Range Transit Plan 5,225,000
RTC Transfer Point Up rade Short Range Transit Plan 775,000
Transit Signal Priority System Short Range Transit Plan 1,050,000
Freight Warehouse Transfer Center Regional Transportation Plan 1,350,000
Voice Enunciation System Short Range Transit Plan 260,000
Automatic Bus Washer Short Range Transit Plan 260,000
Bus Yard Expansion Regional Transportation Plan 3,125,000
Total Transit 15,063,000
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION $609,343,000
-9-
a -q
PROJECT
i •
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
CULTURAL AND •CIAL SERVICES
.Parks and Recreation_-— —_ __ _ -,
Parks
Laguna Lake Park Master Plan Parks and Recreation Element(2.55.2) 2,614,000
Laguna Lake Dredging LadunaLake Maria ement Program 7,319,000
Margarita Area Neighborhood Park/Additional MASP/Parks & Recreation Element 8,158,500
Sports Fields 2.53
Orcutt Area Neighborhood Park OASP/Parks &Recreation Element 11,111,100
2.53
Caltrans North Property Acquisition & Park Mid-Hi uera Enhancement Plan 2,331,000
Other Parks to Meet 10 acres/1,000 Goal Parks and Recreation Element 2.1.1 71,639,400
Other Improvements
Mini Parks Parks and Recreation Element 2.40 1,050,000
Tennis Courts Parks and Recreation Element 2.40 625,000
Sinsheimer Park Master Plan Parks and Recreation Element(2.56.2) 2,100,000
Community Center Parks and Recreation Element 2.54 8,350,000
Meadow Park Upgrades Parks and Recreation Element 2.54 260,000
Sand Volleyball Facility Emerson Park Parks and Recreation Element(2.57.5) 105,000
Skate Park Major City Goal 2007-09 1,000,000
Golf Course Parks.,& Recreation Element 1.33.2 209,000
Total Parks and Recreation 116,872,000
-Cultural Services
Adobe Restoration Parks and Recreation Element 2.57.5 3,125,000
Railroad District Gateway Tree Planting Railroad District Plan 26,000
Historic Railroad Car Display Railroad District Plan__ _ 26,000
Public Art @ 1%of CIP Costs Art ih Public Places Policy 8,725,000
Total Cultural Services 11,902,000
TOTAL LEISURE, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL SERVICES 128,774,000
10 40
i
PROJECT
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
Natural Resources
Open Space Acquisition,Trail Development Conservation &Open Space Element 25,000,000
Creek Pedestrian Trail and Open S-ace I Mid-Hi"uera Enhancement Plan 500,000
Total Natural Resources 25,500,000
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 25,500,000
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description Plan or Policy Link Cost
GOVERNMENTGENERAL
Information Technology
Document Management IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 650,000
E-Government IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 250,000
Technology Mgt Tools/Security Improvements IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 225,000
Technology Infrastructure Improvements IT Strategic Plan, March 2001 813,000
Total Information Technology 1,938,000
Buildings
City Hall Expansion Conceptual Physical Plan for City Ctr; 20,000,000
Facilities Master Plan: 1988-2010
Total Buildings 1 20,000,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 21,938,000
FUNCTIONSUMMARY BY
Public Safety 46,847,300
Public Utilities 65,420,000
Transportation 609,343,000
Leisure, Cultural and Social Services 128,774,000
Community Development 25,500,000
General Government 21,938,000
Total $897,822,300
Long-Term CIP By Function: $897.8 Million
■ Community ❑ General
Development Government
3% 2%
❑Public Safety
5%
❑Leisure, Cultural
&Social
Services
14% [3 Transportation
69%
■Public Utilities
7%
- 12-