Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/21/2010, PH5 - CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO UPDATE THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES A council nn,D .,i io j AgcnbA REpoRt I..Numbs C I TY OF SAN LU IS O B I S P O FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Direct 4A Prepared By: Kim Murry, Deputy Director, Long Range Planning SUBJECT: CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO UPDATE THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND CREATE A HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE (GPI 72-09) RECOMMENDATION As recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee: 1. Introduce an ordinance to add new chapter 14.01 of Title 14 (Community Preservation) to the Municipal Code to incorporate historic preservation regulations; and 2. Adopt a resolution updating the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines; and 3. Authorize staff to make non-substantive formatting changes to conform the ordinance to Municipal Code numbering conventions after incorporating any Council amendments to the proposed ordinance. DISCUSSION Report in Brief Historic preservation actions have been a part of the City's efforts for over 30 years. The Conservation and Open Space Element (COSE) contains policies and programs that direct the City to adopt an Historic Preservation Ordinance (LOSE 3.6.10) and to review and guide development applications that have the potential to affect historic resources. The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), an advisory body charged with administering the City's historic preservation efforts, identified creation of a Historic Preservation Ordinance as a work-program goal for many years and documented this need in a Whitepaper to the Council in 2000. In the 2009-2011 Financial Plan, the Council identified creation of an historic preservation ordinance as an Other Important. Objective and the CHC has developed a draft ordinance and updated guidelines for Council consideration (Attachments 7 and 8). The CHC and Architectural Review Commission conducted eight public hearings and two workshops, and staff has conducted numerous outreach efforts in an attempt to engage the community and incorporate changes supported by the CHC. In addition, the State Historic Preservation Officer has reviewed the draft Ordinance and updated Guidelines and changes have been made to address those comments. The CHC-endorsed draft Ordinance and updated Guidelines are now ready for Council consideration. While most of the provisions and practices remain the same (albeit reorganized), there are a couple of changes that have raised concerns from several members of the public- T1 \ ublic:T1 \ C. Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 2 namely the proposed enforcement and penalties section of the Ordinance. Attachment 1 shows how public input during the review process was incorporated into the documents and Attachment 3 lists other communities that have enforcement procedures and penalties. Background The City of San Luis Obispo has been involved in historic preservation efforts for at least 30 years. In the 1980's, the City undertook a historic survey of the older buildings in town and approved a listing of properties considered to be Historic Resources. The Council established a temporary advisory body to review the listing information and make recommendations to Council. In 1987, the Council established the Cultural Heritage Committee as a.permanent advisory body, created three Historical Preservation Districts in order to identify older parts of the City that contain some of the historic fabric of the community, and adopted Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. The CHC regularly reviews additions to the list of historic resources, however, the Guidelines have not been substantially altered since that time. In the mid 1990's there was a push to develop a post-disaster historic preservation approach so that historic buildings did not get demolished after a disaster. Then, in 2000, the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) presented a "White Paper" to Council, in response to a variety of issues of concern, including demolitions of historic resources. The document contained an evaluation of the City's historic preservation program and made recommendations for future actions. One of the recommendations included adoption of a Historic Preservation Ordinance, which was seen as an effective response to the occurrence of unpermitted building demolitions. Historic Preservation Ordinances can also address "demolition by neglect," where property owners essentially demolish their historic properties through a lack of maintenance and care. In 2006, with the adoption of the COSE, the Council included several programs that specifically address historic preservation goals. One of the programs says that the City will adopt a historic preservation ordinance(COSE 3.6.10). The CHC has been charged with administering the historic preservation program and making recommendations to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC), the Director of Community Development, and the City Council. In the intervening years, the CHC identified development of the Historic Preservation Ordinance as a yearly work goal, but it was not until the 2009-2011 Financial Plan that the City Council also identified development of the ordinance as a work program priority. This Other Important Objective also included direction to conduct a historic survey if funds became available. General Plan Direction There are multiple General Plan policies and programs in the Conservation and Open Space Element that provide direction for development of the ordinance and guidelines. Several are listed below with responses indicating how the recommended drafts address the General Plan direction. Program 3.6.3: The Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission will provide specific guidance on the construction of new buildings within historic districts. J Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 3 How it is implemented: The Guidelines have been updated to contain more information related to historic structures, historic districts, and design review. Graphics have been incorporated into sections to help illustrate key design concepts. The draft Ordinance reflects the development review process currently followed for projects within historic districts. Program 3.6.1 The City's Cultural Heritage Committee will: ...7. Review new development to determine consistency with cultural resource preservation guidelines and standards. How it is implemented: The draft Ordinance reflects the current practice of the development review process where projects located on properties with historic resources or within historic districts are reviewed for consistency with guidelines and standards. The Ordinance calls out when projects are referred to the CHC for review and recommendation. The purview of the CHC is to review only the historic aspects of the project. Their recommendation is forwarded to either the ARC or to the Director depending on the approval authority for the particular type of project under review. Program 3.6.4: The City will be prepared to assess the condition of historic buildings that may be damaged by disasters and to foster their restoration whenever feasible. How it is implemented: The draft Ordinance contains a post-disaster historic preservation section that includes evaluation of historic buildings after a structure-threatening event such as fire, flood or earthquake. The goal of this section is to integrate historic preservation efforts with the City's post-disaster response protocols. While it retains the authority of the Chief Building Official to determine whether proposed shoring, stabilization,.and if necessary demolition actions are appropriate, it allows recommendations regarding historic preservation to be a part of the consideration, thereby fostering restoration where feasible. Program 3.6.10: The City will implement the recommendations of the Cultural Heritage Committee's "Whitepaper", including the adoption of a historic preservation ordinance. How it is implemented: The draft Ordinance and updated Guidelines fulfill a portion of program 3.6.10. Other Whitepaper recommendations for an updated survey etc. will be implemented as funding allows. Ordinance and Guidelines Update Process After the 2009-2011 Financial Plan was adopted, the City hosted a Historic Preservation Workshop in August 2009. Winter and Company, a firm from Boulder Colorado that specializes in historic preservation and has done work with the City of Monterey, lead a two day intensive training for members of the CHC and ARC and staff. The workshop was designed to review key components of successful historic preservation programs and to provide hands-on exercises for advisory body members and staff to consider sample projects with guidance provided by sample standards. This workshop emphasized the importance of documenting a consistent process for development review, identifying periods of significance for the historic districts, and identifying � 5 - 3 Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 4 character-defining features of historic buildings - this created the context for the work associated with developing a historic preservation ordinance. Staff researched various jurisdictions for examples of ordinances and guidelines and the CHC provided input on a table of contents for items the advisory body determined would be important to address as part of the ordinance and guidelines. The CHC reviewed several examples from other jurisdictions and provided input to staff on format, language and approach. The first preliminary drafts of the ordinance and guidelines were presented to the CHC in January 2010. The CHC wanted to develop an ordinance that would enable the City to qualify as a Certified Local Government. Becoming a Certified Local Government enables the City to apply for historic preservation program grants, and provides technical training and support for the City's program. It also indicates that the City's program is in line with State guidelines for historic preservation. In February, staff submitted the very preliminary draft documents to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) staff for review and comment. Since SHPO is the state agency that reviews and approves applications for jurisdictions who desire to become Certified Local Governments, their input was critical to the process. Over the course of the next seven months, the CHC hosted 8 public hearings and one special workshop event and the ARC considered the Guidelines during a public hearing— all designed to elicit community input to the proposed documents. The CHC conducted hearings on the draft documents in a workshop format, normally during their regular meetings, with public comment and interactive discussions occurring as part of the proceedings. Input from the participating public was considered and often endorsed, and edits to the documents were made in real time as part of the proceedings in response. In March 2010 staff received input from SHPO that resulted in substantial changes to the draft documents. Primarily, their input indicated that the "nuts and bolts" of the historic preservation program should be contained in the ordinance and not reside in the guidelines. Therefore, the sections on eligibility criteria, integrity, the respective roles of the CHC and the Director, and the development review process were moved from the draft guidelines to the draft ordinance. In addition, both the City Attorney and the Chief Building Official indicated that enforcement sections needed to occur in the ordinance to provide a stronger basis for implementation. This reorganization provided the opportunity to refocus the Guidelines to address more information regarding the City's historic districts (i.e. periods of significance) and the types of buildings that characterize our historic neighborhoods (i.e. listing of the character-defining features of a Craftsman bungalow or Victorian or Tudor Revival, etc.). In addition, graphics were added to help illustrate some of the key design concepts of compatible development in historic districts. As part of the review process, the Chamber of Commerce expressed some discomfort with language in the draft Ordinance and Guidelines and requested a peer review of the documents. The Chamber formed a temporary subcommittee comprised of architects, engineers, and attorneys to review the documents and provide recommendations. The sub-committee spent considerable time with their review to ensure that the language in the documents supported the expressed intent. Most of the recommendations of the sub-committee were fully endorsed by the CHC and those edits are included in the drafts recommended to the Council for approval. 4�� � � Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines . Page 5 The CHC conducted their final review of the draft documents on July 26, 2010 and recommended that Council adopt the updated Guidelines and enact the new Historic Preservation Ordinance. Public Outreach Questions have been raised regarding whether adequate outreach was conducted as part of this process and whether adequate input from the public helped shape the documents under consideration. Attachment 1 contains a chart showing the comments received, their source and the changes that were made in response to the comments. It is often difficult to attract members of the public to public hearings and workshops. In addition to the legal noti ces.required by the public process, staff attempted to get information to property owners who would most likely have the greatest concerns regarding the proposed ordinance and updated guidelines: the owners of the almost 700 properties on the historic resources inventory. Postcard notifications were sent to those property owners prior to the CHC hearings and workshops in an attempt to generate questions, input, attendance and response. In addition, a brochure (Attachment 2) was sent to the same list of owners to provide some basic information, a location where owners could find more information and a contact name, number and email address. Interested parties were added to an email list and staff provided notifications, links to staff reports and updates to the almost 50 names on that list. Display ads were used for two of the meetings in addition to the legal notices required of all public hearings. Staff provided an overview of the proposed documents at several Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Association meetings, spoke at the local American Institute of Architects meeting, and presented at a SLO Realtors Association meeting. Attendees at these meetings included members who are residents in historic neighborhoods and owners of historic buildings. The Tribune and New Times have published several articles and, subsequent to the CHC making their final recommendation, an additional Workshop was held. The Updated Guidelines and Draft Ordinance Maintain Consistency with Current Roles and Processes Questions have also arisen regarding the changes proposed as part of these documents. The role of the CHC as an advisory body and the role of the Community Development Director are not recommended to change. The development review process for development on historic properties or properties in historic districts is not recommended to change. The ordinance language reflects the review process which has been in place for over 20 years. Property maintenance standards addressed in Section 17.17 of the Municipal Code and International Property Maintenance Code standards will also remain unchanged.. While these key features of the City's program will not change, substantial re-organization of the historic preservation program provisions is recommended. The historic listing eligibility criteria, roles of the CHC and Director, and development review process have been moved from the Guidelines into the draft Ordinance. The Guidelines have been augmented with graphics, Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 6 descriptions of historic building type character-defining features and historic district descriptions. There are, however, several more substantive changes proposed as part of the draft Ordinance. Substantive Changes Proposed as Part of the Proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance The CHC's White Paper identified a problem with the City's efforts to implement its historic preservation program. The problem is that property owners who feel burdened by the presence of historic resources on their property, or who want to pursue development that would impact those resources, have an incentive to carry out demolition either by performing the work without a construction permit, or by simply neglecting their property until the historic resource becomes degraded to the point it poses a health or safety risk and loses its historical significance (demolition by neglect). The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) recognizes the value of historic preservation and requires all new projects that may have an impact on historical resources to be evaluated in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The City's current Historic Preservation Program Guidelines also provide direction from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to help guide what a property owner can do with their property when proposed changes may impact the significance of a historic resource. While the vast majority of property owners who pursue development on sites with historical resources follow these guidelines, the guidelines may run contrary to some property owner's goals. If a property owner wants to move forward with a project that would demolish, or otherwise adversely impact the significance of a historic resource, CEQA would require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, which can be a costly process. Unfortunately, the cost of this process can create an incentive to demolish historic resources outside of the normal review process. As a result, some jurisdictions in California have found it necessary to create preservation ordinances with fines and building moratoria to deter unpermitted demolition that may seem to be a less expensive option to the environmental review process. The decision by the City Council to update the COSE with Program 3.6.10 recognized the need for an ordinance to establish penalties for those that would seek to damage historic resources on their property as way to avoid maintaining or improving that resource as part of a future project. In addition, the ordinance provisions discussed below recognize the value to the whole community of a well-maintained stock of historic buildings, structures and other resources. In recognition of this community-wide benefit, a fund is proposed that would help provide financial resources for future preservation projects. Enforcement The draft Ordinance includes a section entitled "Non-Compliance with Provisions," which addresses enforcement actions specific to historic resources. This section specifies legal authority for enforcement, recommends penalties for violations, and describes property defects that could lead to structural failure and the subsequent need to demolish the historic structure - something the historic preservation program aims to avoid, if possible. The enforcement section of the draft ordinance has received the most divided public input to date and was discussed at length at the CHC meetings. Members of the preservation community have supported the need ?x.{5 , (0 Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 7 for significant penalties in order to deter demolition by neglect whereas input from some homeowners indicates that addressing property maintenance and enabling the City to impose large fines goes well beyond what they envision to be appropriately addressed in the ordinance. The ordinance does not specify how frequently a historic property must be painted or address maintenance of non-historic aspects of property care. Rather; the proposed ordinance describes situations that represent conditions leading to demolition by neglect. Staff is recommending changes to the CHC-recommended draft to further describe this intent and these changes are shown in "track changes" mode for section 2.68.074 of the document included in Attachment 4. Penalties This CHC asked that a provision for substantial penalties be included in the ordinance to dis- incentivize unauthorized demolition including demolition by neglect. As a result, the following penalties are proposed: 1. Fines - The Council may assess a one time fine of up to $10,000 per violation and may assess a fine ranging from $100 to $5,000 per day, up to a maximum of 30 days, for continuing violations. 2. Building permit restriction—property owners may be prohibited from obtaining a building permit for up to five years from the date of unapproved demolition unless the permit is to correct a violation. 3. Loss of preservation benefits- Any historic preservation benefits previously granted to the property may be subject to revocation. 4. Restoration may be required. 5. Other remedies may be identified including the City taking action to have the maintenance performed at the owner's expense and if payment is not made, the cost would become a lien on the property. Many other jurisdictions have historic preservation programs that include penalties (see chart — Attachment 3) and discussions with staff in several jurisdictions that have large fines indicated that just having the ability to assign a large fine was often all the deterrent needed to ensure that historic properties were not allowed to deteriorate to the point that demolition was the only viable option. The intent of this section of the ordinance is to have a mechanism to address the most egregious instances where a historic resource is in danger of being lost .due to neglect whether benign or intentional. The question has been posed of why the City does not use its current ability to impose fines to address property maintenance issues. The City's current penalty procedures are enabled through an administrative fine process and implementation of the International Property Maintenance Code and Chapter 17.17 of the Zoning Code. While the International Property Maintenance Code includes general definitions of safety violations, the standards are primarily geared to address human health risks (i.e. pest infestation, venting, access and egress issues, provision of Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 8 water/sewer/heat, etc.) and do not specifically address the types of property defects that could result in destruction of the integrity of a historic resource. The Zoning Code also contains provisions that address destroyed or damaged buildings, lack of finish materials and the idea that abandoned buildings may become attractive nuisances. However, the provisions specify timeframes that fail to address the sensitivity of historic resources and their vulnerability to loss of integrity due to neglect. Neither of the referenced codes includes penalties that would provide a serious dis-incentive to demolish the historic resource either through action or inaction. The Code Enforcement staff currently works with property owners to encourage voluntary compliance to correct any noted violations. This process can take weeks or months depending on the severity and type of violation. If the owner is unwilling to resolve the violation despite the City's efforts to achieve voluntary compliance, the City has the ability to cite the owner and assign an administrative fine. With the first citation, the fine is $100. The owner is provided a timeframe in which to pay the fine and to bring the property into compliance. This process may be repeated if correction of the violation does not occur—the maximum fine the City may impose under the administrative citation process is $300. If the owner is still unwilling to correct the violation and does not pay the fine, the only option available to the City is to pursue correction through the court system and to send the unpaid citation(s) to a collection agency. During this time (which can span many months or,years) the historic resource may deteriorate to the point where demolition for safety reasons is the only option remaining. The proposed ordinance provisions make such a de-facto demolition more expensive. Similar to current code enforcement practices, the City staff would work with property owners to achieve voluntary compliance under the new ordinance. Fines would be used as a last,resort. Staff is recommending an edit to section 2.68.073D to reflect that enforcement will be conducted in the same manner as the current administrative fine process. The CHC included an economic hardship provision at the recommendation of the State Historic Preservation Office. This provision would enable the Council to approve demolition or modification of a historic resource in a way that does not meet the standards of the ordinance if there is a documented economic hardship. New Historic Preservation Fund The Ordinance includes enabling language for the City to set up a preservation fund. The intent of this fund is to provide resources for historic preservation efforts and to support incentive programs such as loans or grants to assist with historic preservation. The initial drafts of the ordinance specified that any penalties collected from enforcement actions would be deposited into the historic preservation fund. However, public testimony indicated concern that the City would be much more aggressive in assigning fines in order to provide resources for the fund, which was not the intent. Therefore, the CHC removed the provision that connected penalty fines to the fund. Staff is recommending the provisions related to the Historic Preservation Fund be listed under a separate section than that related to non-compliance provisions. Any penalty fines collected will be deposited to the General Fund consistent with existing practice. Future Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 9 resources for the fund may include, grant monies or General Fund monies should the Council assign them. Changes Proposed as Part of the Updated Historic Preservation Guidelines The Historic Preservation Guidelines have been in place since the mid-1980s and reflected the state of the City's historic preservation program at the time. As the draft ordinance was developed through the public hearing process, the CHC made changes to both the existing guidelines and the proposed ordinance. In response to SHPO's recommendation, the eligibility criteria and other procedural provisions contained in theguidelines were moved to the draft ordinance. This provided an opportunity for the Guidelines to provide more information regarding the historic nature of the City's districts and historic buildings as well as to provide design guidance specific to historic districts and properties. The Guidelines have undergone a wholesale change with most sections relocated to the draft ordinance and other sections removed in their entirety. Attachment 6 contains a chart that documents what occurred with each existing section of the guidelines. Threshold for demolition Section 3.6 of the Guidelines indicates that alteration of more than 25% of an historic structure's original building framework, roof and exterior walls, or relocation of the resource to a site outside the City limits is considered to be a demolition of that resource. The provisions exempt repairs that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. This threshold is more restrictive than the Zoning Code's definition of demolition which is triggered when more than 50% of the structure is affected. The CHC chose the lower threshold to reflect that historic resources can only retain their ability to communicate their history if the integrity of the structure, materials, and features has not been unduly compromised. The threshold is lower to reflect the increased vulnerability of historic structures to loss of historic fabric as more of the structure is altered. This section of the proposed Guidelines received much discussion among the architects and designers who reviewed and commented on the documents. Some felt the thresholds should be the same for both historic and non-historic resources. Others felt that while the Guidelines provide direction, they do not have the same force of law as is the case for the Ordinance. There are implications with the lowered thresholds: a project proposal to substantially alter an historic resource where more than 25% of the structure is changed might trigger a finding of"adverse impact" during the environmental evaluation of the proposal. This could lead to a lengthier and more costly environmental review process. However, the CHC felt that the lower threshold was an appropriate recognition of the importance of historic integrity to ensure that proposed changes did not negatively impact the resource. What is the benefit of having an ordinance and updated guidelines? Having an historic preservation ordinance will enable the City to apply to become a Certified. Local Government (CLG). This state program recognizes jurisdictions with historic preservation programs that are consistent with state and national historic preservation standards. The State -1 ti Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Page 10 Historic Preservation Office has grant funds that are available only to communities with CLG status. While the grants are not large — typically $25,000 or less — these are funds that the City currently cannot apply for that could help fund preservation efforts. Becoming a CLG will also enable the City to access a State-wide community of CLGs where best practices and professional state of the practice discussions occur. However, the City must first adopt an ordinance that meets State standards. The current recommendation by the CHC will accomplish this first step. CONCURRENCES The Chief Building Official and City Attorney have reviewed the proposed Guidelines and Ordinance to ensure consistency with existing processes and authority and appropriate legal format. FISCAL IMPACT There are no fiscal impacts to the adoption of the proposed Ordinance and Guidelines. No changes are proposed to the development review process. Minor costs for copying and distribution will be incurred once the updated Guidelines and Ordinance are adopted however these costs were anticipated in the Community Development Department budget. ALTERNATIVES 1. The Council could request that changes be made to the Ordinance or Guidelines. Specific direction to staff would be needed. 2. The Council could adopt the Guidelines and not the Ordinance. This is not recommended because the eligibility criteria and process are described in the Ordinance. Without an adopted Ordinance the City would not be eligible for CLG status. 3. The Council could continue this item to a future date with direction to staff to return with specific information. ATTACHMENTS 1. Public Input and Response Chart 2. Brochure 3. Communities with Enforcement/Penalties 4. Draft Ordinance with tracked changes 5. Existing Guidelines with strikeout text 6. Chart of Guidelines changes 7. Resolution with Guidelines 8. Resolution with Ordinance Council Reading File: General Plan COSE pp 6-16 through 6-20; Zoning Code Sections 17.17.075 and 17.54; International Property Maintenance Standards; Draft Ordinance and Guidelines. _ Attachment 1 Public Input of the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Comments followed by Staff response in Italics Commenter Comment and Response Architectural Requested that CHC include clarifying language regarding distinguishing Review additions. Expressed some concern that less than 75% retention of Commission historic structure could be considered a demolition. Requested that Folk Victorian style be added to the building styles section. Requested that styles an should also include local examples of each style. Provided some minor graphical edits. Reference to existing Community Design Guidelines would be helpful. CHC added Folk Victorian style to Chapter 5 as well as several addresses local examples for each style. Community Design Guidelines were referenced under section 2.5. Additional discussion of 75% retention -this section is meant to define what gets considered as part of the evaluation of demolition versus remodel. It addresses building integrity and also allows some flexibility to address those features for which removal might be more impactful (i.e. situations where they are character-defining compared to other circumstances where they do not contribute to the character or integrity of the historic structure). Distinguishing non-historic from historic is addressed under 3.1.2. Betsy Bertrando, Proposed ordinance typical of those used in over 300 California cities; historian strong ordinance needed to address demolition by neglect and "accidental" demolitions of historic resources; financial penalties seem low compared to value of historic properties; long term economic benefits from a preservation ordinance..Recommends merging local eligibility criteria with State standards. Draft ordinance has been prepared to follow state guidelines and address local conditions. Local eligibility criteria are now simplified and grouped under California Register Criteria. David Brodie There is an economic benefit to historic preservation because the history of a place is what people recognize, respond to and return to. The value of a historic resource is related to its setting and to the connection to what the place was at the time the resource was constructed. A copy of a historic resource does not work in the same way. An example of recognizing the importance of setting and resources may be found in Bath, Great Britain —the entire city has been listed. Don't lose what draws people to this community. Errors cannot be reversed — once a historic resource is gone it is irretrievable. If the Ordinance and Guidelines are adopted, who will enforce "demolition by neglect" provisions? City needs to have Attachment 1 inspectors who comb the City for these types of situations and actively enforce penalty provisions. Enforcement will be conducted through established enforcement process. The City will not have inspectors combing the City looking for violations. Russell Brown Expressed concern about objectivity of an applicant-provided structural report to determine the feasibility of repairing or restoring a historic building. While applicant is responsible for submitting structural reports, City staff, advisory bodies, and/or Council are responsible for reviewing adequacy of reports submitted regardless of who prepares them. Joseph Carotenuti, The historic ordinance and guidelines should not only attend to the historian preservation of historic structures but also to those who built, occupied, etc. the homes and buildings. It is people who make history; not simply structures. Historic significance criteria include association with persons and events important to the City's history. Preserved structures, sites and districts are often tangible links to historically important persons or businesses. Paula Carr, Clearer definition of historic"context" needed. Recommends definitions historian follow City of San Diego ordinance and link with definition with research and documentary. CHC moved environmental context criteria into section on Historic District consideration. Historic District descriptions include information on periods of significance, lot patterns, building styles and other pertinent information to assist with review of context. Robert Chattel, In historic eligibility criteria in ordinance and use criteria from architectural alifornia Register of Historical Resources; historic districts should follow historian same criteria; questions use of potentially contributing resource status; recommends Secretary of the Interiors Standards and primary source of local design guidelines; concerned about quantifying % of historic structure to be preserved; questions style guide Section 7 in guidelines, feels styles are incorrectly labeled; recommends the Downtown Historic District period of significance extend to the 1930s. SHPO indicated that eligibility criteria be included in ordinance. CLG program requires cities to "Maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties"—cities may adopt their own eligibility criteria that reflect local conditions; values, needs, historic districts review criteria are listed in Section 4.2.4;potentially contributing section needs additional clarification, as noted in 4/26110 CHC agenda report, style nomenclature is highly variable and there is no single accepted standard — the CHC may choose to apply a different nomenclature than currently -2 - P1465 -l:)- Attachment 1 used, Downtown district period of significance revised to extend to the 1930s. Chamber Sub- Who bears cost of storage of significant architectural features if committee they are stored by City? Language added to clarify that the property owner would bear this cost. Since the option.is provided only with the property-owner's consent, the agreement would have to include agreement to share costs. Ordinance 2.68.065(c)(ii) Chamber Sub- Specifying performance to correct violation within 30 days may not committee be reasonable if violation involves structural issues. Owner may have to involve design professionals or engineers to develop plans for permits, etc. Allow additional time as long as owner is diligently pursuing correction of violation. Chief Building Official agrees that if violations involve requirement for engineered plans or other structural responses, performance within 30 days may not be possible. Language added to section to clarify this possibW Ordinance 2.68.072C Chamber Sub- Language that specifies each day as a separate violation results in committee misunderstandings in subsequent sections with a result of the possibility of fines up to $10,000 per day. Removing one sentence still allows initial fine of$10,000 with subsequent fines. CHC supported removal of the sentence since subsequent sentences allow fines for continuing violations. Ordinance 2.68.073D. June 2010 draft reflects updated language. Chamber Sub- Concern expressed regarding Guidelines Section 2.5 "Related committee Standards and Policies". Request to add clarification describing which standard or policy takes precedence in the case of inconsistency. This information is provided to illustrate other places where historic preservation policies are found, no changes are proposed. General Plan and implementation measures are consistent however building or fire codes may have more restrictive standards.. Health and Safety standards will always be implemented by the City. Chamber Sub- Architectural compatibility indicates that "new development shall committee not sharply contrast with, block public views of, or visually detract from....". Request to add the word "significantly" to the phrase "block public views of'. Concern is that ANY reduction in public view could result in finding of non-compliance. Edit accepted by CHC. June 2010 draft Guidelines includes change to 3.1.6. - 3 - Attachment 1 Chamber Sub- Throughout Guidelines— be consistent in referencing historic committee resource as a "listed resource". Edits made and appear in June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance. Chamber Sub- Enforcement fines are placed into Historic Preservation Fund (2.68.076). committee This will generate incentive for City to actively seek new violations to provide funds for historic preservation efforts. Intent was not to incentivize enforcement actions but rather to have some identified and related fund in which to place any enforcement fines collected. In order to address unintended perception, provision was changed. Capability to establish Preservation Fund is still included but enforcement fines and fund are no longer linked. Ermina Karim, The Chamber of Commerce values the history of the community Chamber of and recognizes historic preservation's role as an economic driver. Commerce The Chamber is requesting a third parry peer review to assist with information concerning how regulations get implemented. The Chamber also has a concern regarding the definition of"historic resource" which is very broad and includes things that may be "potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation." Peer review was accomplished by Chamber task force comprised of architects, engineers, and attorneys review of documents. Edits have been incorporated in response and are reflected in June 2010 draft Ordinance and Guidelines. Category of"potentially contributing"has been removed. Chief Building Post-disaster provisions in ordinance should be clarified to address Official how they interact with FEMA and municipal code provisions for post-disaster activities Language modifications included in 2.68.064. City Attorney Community Development Director role needs to be defined in ordinance along with CHC role. Staff has included this language in the Ordinance 2.68.045 City Attorney Property maintenance standards need to be moved from the guidelines into the ordinance in order to be enforceable. Revisions made. June 2010 draft section 2.68.070-076 include these provisions. City Attorney Definition of Property Owner should include the word, "or entity" after the word "person" in order to address situations where a property is owned by a corporation or trust, etc. Word added to definition of owner in both Guidelines and - a - PR5 - 114 Attachment 1 Ordinance. June 2010 drafts include this change. City staff Reviewed State Office of Historic Preservation Office Technical Assistance Bulletin #14— Guide for Creating Local Historic Preservation Ordinance. Changes proposed in response_ to nine components that an effective ordinance should address. CHC made edits in response to staff recommendations. June 2010 versions reflect edits to address community preservation goals, legal authority, identification of body charged with administering ordinance, defining types of resources to be protected, defining types of activities to be regulated, consideration of economic hardship, define appeal process, and define enforcement measures. Fred Collins, 2.68.030C should reference "Native American Sites" not archaeological Northern Chumash sites. 2.68.040D should reference "Native American Sites" not Tribal Council archaeological sites. 2.68.076D should read "Native American Sites" not archaeological sites. Definitions: Archaeological Site should be referred to as a Native American Site. A Sacred Place may not have visible cultural materials present therefore this part of the definition should be deleted. The definition of Archaeological site is consistent with how it is defined in the Archaeological Resources Preservation Program Guidelines. Archaeological sites include: Prehistoric Native American archaeological sites; Historic archaeological sites,sites or natural landscapes associated with important human events; and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes. Staff recommends the definition in the appendix be edited to include the full spectrum of possibilities which might trigger designation as an archaeological site so that provisions are not limited to one particular component. Not yet incorporated into draft documents since comment was submitted after CHC recommendation. Staff will address as part of staff report that goes to City Council for consideration. Allan Cooper There may be a negative response from property owners regarding penalty provisions proposed but these provisions are needed. The City must make penalties associated with unauthorized demolition of historic structures costly so that there is a deterrent to demolitions. Concerns that the City Council is the body that will assign the penalties as this becomes a political process rather than an administrative one. Endorses the changes recommended by SHPO. Expressed concern that the decision regarding whether a historic building poses a health and safety issue to the point that it needs to be demolished is made by the Chief Building official. Building neglect can lead to demolition. Concerns about allowing the applicant to provide the structural report to demonstrate lack of feasibility to repair/rehabilitate a historic building and believes this to be a conflict of interest. Enforcement provisions are included in draft Ordinance and include fines. Established enforcement procedures will be followed. - 5 - PNs -t5 Attachment 1 Council has ultimate authority in assigning fines. Chief Building Official was identified as position with authority to determine health and safety issues— this is consistent with FEMA regulation and building code. While applicant is responsible for submitting structural reports, City staff, advisory bodies, and/or Council are responsible for reviewing adequacy of reports submitted regardless of who prepares them. Can the City set up separate fine structures for residential versus commercial structures to address homeowners' concerns about penalties? Ability to distinguish fines for commercial versus residential properties would not address impact of significant deterioration of an historic resource regardless of whether it is a residence or a commercial building. CEQA does not distinguish building use when evaluating impacts. Randy Dettmer, The Eligibility Criteria used for historic listing should be aligned with Architect the California Register—this allows streamlining of CEQA review. Local eligibility criteria are now simplified and grouped under California Register Criteria. The Eligibility Criteria should include an integrity provision. Integrity means that the physical characteristics from the period of significance have survived to a great degree. Historic resources must meet one of the criteria of significance and retain enough historic character or appearance to be recognizable as a resource and to convey the reasons for their significance. An integrity provision has been added under 2.68.053C. While other design guidelines may apply, the Secretary of the Interior(SOI) standards should provide primary guidance. Secretary of Interior Standards are specifically referenced in 3.4.5 of Guidelines. How is the requirement to retain 75% of a structure in order to be considered a remodel quantified? Make it clear what will be considered in determining the 75% (i.e. is it framing? Cladding? Interior work?) Guidelines define demolition as alterations of more than 25% of the original building framework, roof, and exterior walls. Repairs (i.e. rer000 would be exempt under Guidelines 3.6.3: Demolition - 6 - ?H5 - ib Attachment 1 thresholds. Style guide in the Guidelines (section 5.3) may be inaccurate and unnecessary. The "California Victorian" listed is not a style. Refer to A Field Guide to American Houses for accurate styles (i.e. . Queen Anne, East Lake, and others). Section 5.1 has been updated to reflect current naming conventions listed in A Field Guide to American Houses: Jeff Dillon, Multiple edits regarding language and intent. Architect CHC endorsed changes proposed and current June 2010 version incorporates edits. Vangeli Requested that the city prepare a map showing the addresses and Evangelopoulos locations of properties on the Master and Contributing Lists of historic resources. Addresses of properties on the Master and Contributing Lists of Historic Resources are provided in Section 5.3 and 5.4 of the Guidelines. The City has a map of all properties on a GIS map. Alex Gough Generally, the draft documents are knowledgeable and well-intended and perhaps a needed replacement and upgrade of work done in the early 80's. Concerns about "potentially significant" historic resources sections. Also concerned about enforcement of historic building maintenance. These sections should only address serious structural issues and not apply to contributing properties. The category of"potentially historic"has been removed from the proposed ordinance. Enforcement section has been slightly re-worded to reflect existing enforcement procedures(i.e. work with property owner for voluntary compliance). Building maintenance items included on list are those that could lead to serious structural or safety issues. These are provided as examples. Property maintenance is currently based on International Property Maintenance Code and/or California Building Code (as applicable). Proposed ordinance section provides additional information. Larry Hoyt, Concerned about"extending the power" of the CHC; recommends doing owner of historic a historic survey before an ordinance is adopted to become a Certified property at 868 Local Government (CLG); 1983 historic survey not accurate; disagrees Chorro Street with ordinance provisions regarding energy conservation, changes to historic structures, districts, adjacent properties; emergency response program; criteria for demolition of historic resources; CHC role continues to be advisory under the ordinance; to qualify for the CLG program, cities must first enact a historic preservation ordinance; ordinance clarifies procedures commonly used in nominating properties and determining what qualifies for listing, Draft ordinance is consistent with preservation ordinances in California and with state and federal law.. - 7 - IAS '� Attachment 1 Concern about enforcement provisions. Enforcement measures are flexible and require Council action. Additional language being recommended to refer to existing procedures. Concern about definitions. Definitions based on state guidelines and ordinances in other historic cities. Concerned that CHC composition does not require person who owns historic resource, has understanding of preservation law or history. No changes proposed to CHC membership. Current provisions include the desire to have members knowledgeable in local history, training or experience in architectural rehab or restoration, knowledge of architecture or architectural history and a person knowledgeable in archaeology. This does not preclude a historic resource owner to participate (in fact three current CHC members own listed resources). Disagrees with findings of purpose related to economic vitality. Research show historic properties retain more value and contribute to sense of place and historic tourism. Disagrees with use of"public health, safety and welfare" as part of purpose—not part of preservation case law. 1978 Supreme Court decision (Penn Central case) allows states and cities to enact land use restrictions to enhance quality of life by preserving character and desirable aesthetic features of the City. Court determined that it is not a taking and not discriminatory. Disagrees with concept of"embodied energy" of historic buildings— Rehabilitation standards allow replacement of materials. Embodied energy is one of many purposes listed and is a valid purpose to meet multiple policy desires of the City. It can remain a purpose and Secretary of the Interior Standards can still be applied to proposed changes to historic buildings. No conflict exists. Concerns about 2.68.012 G and H - language should say "advise" instead of"establish" or"fulfill'. Section 2.68.012 refers to purpose of the Ordinance not the purpose of the CHC which is covered under "Duties". Therefore the language is appropriate to call out the purpose of the ordinance. Concerns about wording under CHC duties—should reference that their role is advisory. Has concerns that adopting local standards may conflict with National or State Guidelines. - 8 - Attachment 1 CHC duties have been established by Council and their role has not been expanded. The CHC actions are still recommendations and this is called out in section 2.68.040. No conflict with NPS or State guidelines exist and ordinance has been amended to address State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) input. Concern about actions subject to CHC review includes "potentially contributing". "Potentially contributing"category has been removed. Concern about evaluation criteria - 50 years or less. Use Federal Register criteria instead. Definition of 50 years or less comes straight from California Register criteria. CHC asked that local criteria be grouped under and consistent with California Register criteria— this has been done. No changes proposed. Concern about 2.68.072A authority— how legislative body or advisory body can have enforcement power. Authority of bodies listed pertains to their specific area of expertise. While the CHC may be the designated body to determine historic significance, the process to address post-disaster action would still be followed and the Chief Building Official will retain decision-making power to determine health and safety issues. 2:68.07313— Failure to protect property language is concerning. Will the City arrest people in reliance on this language? Concern that ordinance should not include an economic hardship provision. Language "willfully or otherwise"-has been removed under property protection section. City has an established enforcement process that involves working with property owner for voluntary compliance. Only extreme cases will be considered for fines. Council will have final discretion on fines. Economic hardship provision added at recommendation of SHPO. Guidelines Concern about language in 1.2 and 1.3 being too florid. These sections provide description of early history. Guidelines are able to provide more descriptive language than ordinance. Concern about CHC duties in 2.3—should state everything is advisory. CHC duties are set by Council. The process is still advisory(through recommendations) but the CHC has the primary duty to initiate these items. - 9 - Attachment 1 Section 2.4—thinks policy direction for CDD director role should be clearly worded. This language reflects current practice of the CDD Director. 3.1 Standards limit creativity and represent"taking" since only same height building would be allowed. These are guidelines with illustration examples to reflect how building components fit together without requiring any one particular style. Graphic in next section clearly shows taller building as "compatible".. 3.4.3—Objects to threshold of 75% of building preserved in order not to be called "demolition". Wants to know what this threshold is based on. 50% is called out in Zoning Ordinance as demolition— CHC determined that historic buildings should be subject to a higher threshold in order to address integrity issues. Millie James What provisions are included in draft documents? Historic Property owner Staff provided a summary of changes. Tom Jess Suggested edits to include "consistent with materials used of a period addition." Section 3.4.5 of the Guidelines includes language which addresses the compatibility of materials in additions to historic properties. Gerald Johnson Expressed concern about how the location of properties in historic districts would affect new buildings on vacant lots. Section 3.1 of the Guidelines addresses new construction in historic districts. Graphics have been incorporated into the June 2010 draft to illustrate in-fill design concepts. Shelly Johnson Questioned the benefit of a property being designated "potentially San Luis Obispo historic". How would owners know what standards apply? The category of"potentially historic"has been removed from the proposed ordinance. June 2010 version of Ordinance reflects this direction. Michel Kalin Questions regarding building codes that will be used when change of Engineer occupancy is proposed (Incentives allow additional uses for historic structures). Post disaster.provisions are not clear as to who approves the engineer's report. Post disaster provision was clarified to designate the Chief Building Official as the one who approves the engineer's report. The Building Division will apply construction codes to determine necessary design criteria relative to safe occupancy of a structure. Bob Pavlik Indicated that hopefully there would be an economic disincentive - 10 - Attachment 1 for an applicant to provide a structural report that was skewed or inaccurate because the City would require the applicant to pay for another study or peer review of the report. The City has an obligation to exercise independent judgment and to review the information to ensure it is accurate and complete. Staff concurs. While applicant is responsible for submitting structural reports, City staff, advisory bodies, and/or Council are responsible for reviewing adequacy of reports submitted regardless of who prepares them. Peg Pinard Frustrated with City process for update to documents. Feels there has been a lack of neighborhood involvement. Staff has made repeated offers to attend neighborhood meetings. Discussion of notification and outreach conducted follows. Guidelines in place for over 30 years and current laws treat historic properties the same as every other home in the City. While the City has not had an Ordinance, the Guidelines have directed a different level of review for structures on the list of historic resources or within an historic district than structures not on the list or within a district. This has been accomplished through the development review process and no changes are proposed to that process though the standards are being relocated from the Guidelines to the Ordinance at the recommendation of SHPO. The City is giving itself more authority over homes. The City already has authority it needs. The proposed Ordinance contains new penalties and describes the types of conditions that lead to demolition by neglect. This is not new authority but rather more well-defined criteria. The penalties recommended are new. The current enforcement process does not have the larger fines proposed under the Ordinance. While it has enforcement ability through the administrative fine process, the penalties are not substantial enough to discourage demolition by neglect. The City's constitution under LUE 2.15E requires that the City will involve residents early in reviewing proposed public and private projects and this wasn't done. Staff unveiled a finished draft that did not have early input from the residents. LUE 2.15E refers to the desire to develop Neighborhood Wellness Plans where individual neighborhood needs would be explored and action plans (both public and private) would be reviewed with the residents. While notices were sent to every property owner of the 700+properties on the historic resources list, the historic preservation effort is not one that is generated by the neighborhoods but rather has been of city-wide interest Attachment 1 for over 30 years. The preliminary drafts were developed with input from the CHC. The public was invited to participate and help make the changes to reflect their input. Many changes were made in response to public input and the drafts considered by Council are much different than those that were originally presented to the CHC and public for discussion due to the input of the community and the State. This ordinance provides a stricter set of laws for those who happen to live in older homes. The proposed Ordinance and Guidelines affect all historic properties and districts. Historic structures are treated differently under CEQA and under the City's process already. The proposed documents do not change the City's process. What is not already covered under the existing Municipal Code and laws? The Ordinance provides additional clarification for what can lead to demolition by neglect and the penalties that could be assigned if Council felt it to be appropriate. An economic hardship provision has been added to the proposed ordinance and this is not covered under current regulations. The state policies support periodic inspections. How will the city implement and pay for these? City staff conducts periodic monitoring of properties with Mills Act contracts. Since owners under these contracts commit to making certain improvements in exchange for substantial tax credits, the owners are asked to provide documentation to the County Assessor on a yearly basis. City staff also follows up to do visual inspections from the street and ask owners for input on status of the improvements listed in their contracts. No additional work or changes are proposed. While the state may support periodic inspections, it does not REQUIRE them. How can residents be guaranteed the Ordinance will not be used as a source of revenue? The Ordinance provides the. Council the ability to enforce penalties. This provision requires a process including notice to the owner and a public hearing. The Council will require that any situation coming before them is well-documented and that a penalty hearing has come about as a last resort. Since this process is highly public, the Council will only take action on the most egregious situation. What prevents the City from expanding its jurisdiction and inspections to include the inside of our homes? Fourth amendment rights prevent the City from entering homes to - i 2 - -P Attachment 1 conduct inspections unless invited in directly or through a permit application. The current preservation program would allow an owner to request or an environmental review process to note a significant interior of a building—for example the Sauer ovens-as part of the resource's significance. No changes are proposed. Won't additional laws with severe fines and penalties drive away potential buyers? Research has shown that historic districts and structures maintain their value more than non-historic during even dire economic times. How is a person not in jeopardy of losing their home if the City's mandates and costs (for enforcement) keep mounting? The City's approach is to work with owners to resolve code violations. The proposed Ordinance does not change that approach and in fact adds a new economic hardship provision to address situations where owners are financially unable to comply. If the City is going to determine where and when a repair needs to be done, this will interfere with the normal market conditions and will have the effect of keeping such properties out of the reach of young families. The proposed Ordinance does not set out a maintenance schedule for historic properties. The provisions include a description of conditions which may lead to demolition by neglect. Market conditions will still apply. If the City cares about ability to live in historic parts of town, why haven't problems been addressed? Unsure what is being referred to or whether it relates to proposed ordinance and guidelines. Where does it say that original fixtures can be retained or that existing driveways can be replaced in the same configuration? The historic building code allows an owner to request different standards than current International Building Code requirements. Where does it say that an existing structure can be rebuilt to non- conforming situation? Section 4.1.1 of the Guidelines states this. The rental housing business license tax was supposed to be used to enhance livability and neighborhood needs. Why is the city not doing this? Unsure what is being referred to or whether it relates to proposed - 13 - TY �j ��3 Attachment 1 ordinance and guidelines. Additional comments regarding bars in downtown and associated vandalism and trash; delivery truck noise and damage in historic districts near downtown; graffiti on utility boxes that should be underground; adherence to noise standards and liability concerns for children standing under loudspeakers; parking issues for neighborhoods near downtown; Old Town not to get residential parking program approval; car alarms going off; traffic pattern changes in Old Town were not reviewed with residents; noisy traffic signs;transient population; lack of coordination between City departments; and the City not following its General Plan. Comments do not seem to address provisions in proposed ordinance and guidelines. Public comment The Eligibility Criteria used for historic listing should be aligned with the California Register and section on Integrity should be added. Local eligibility criteria are now simplified and grouped under California Register Criteria. Integrity section was added. Ordinance 2.68.053 A-C Pierre Rademaker Noted that the history of the people is as important as the structure in considering preservation, suggested that"historic contexts° be added as a requirement for historic preservation report. Requested that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties be referenced in the "Treatment of Historic Resources" section of the Guidelines. The CHC approved the addition of"historic context"to the preservation report requirements. Section 3.1.1 of the Guidelines references the Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The.June 2010 draft reflects both of these changes. State Historic Historic resource and district listing eligibility criteria should be in the Preservation Office Ordinance rather than the Guidelines. (SHPO) Changes made. June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance reflect this direction. SHPO Post disaster procedures should reference and be in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5028 which pertains to Natural Disaster Damage to Historic Property. Done. June 2010 version of Ordinance 2.68.061 reflects this direction. SHPO Procedures for historic resource and historic district listing (in addition to eligibility criteria) should be in the Ordinance rather than the Guidelines. Changes made. June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance reflect this direction. SHPO Reconstruction may not be an appropriate response to an un-approved demolition of an historic structure under Penalties for Non-corn liance . - 14- S `aq Attachment 1 Provision 2.68.073D revised to specify restoration "may"rather than °shall'be required. June 2010. version of Ordinance reflects this direction SHPO Demotion definition should be succinct and conclusive. Example provided from City of Davis. Definition in both Guidelines and Ordinance has been updated to reflect recommended wording. June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance reflect this direction.. SHPO Various edits to language addressing historic districts (and the possibility that new ones may be allowed to form); reference to Historic Building Code (both CA Building Code and the State Historical Building Code); and definition of Survey. Definition in both Guidelines and Ordinance has been updated to reflect recommended wording. June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance reflect this direction.. SHPO Strongly encourage language that closely parallels National and CA Registry eligibility criteria. Done. CA Registry criteria now comprises headings under eligibility with simplified local eligibility criteria grouped below. SHPO Recommended language edits to address definition of historic district and to add criteria for historic signs. Recommended clarifications to historic resources report content and other edits for clarity in Guidelines. Done. Edits made, historic sign criteria added and report content clarified. June 2010 versions of Guidelines and Ordinance reflect this direction. Warren "Loss of income" insurance typically covers a business for up to 1 yr. Sinsheimer, following a disaster. If an ordinance such as the CHC ordinance delays Attorney and the time for a business to resume (after a disaster), that exposes the owner of historic business owner to increased risk unless the owner fully understands the property impact of,the ordinance. Violations imposed as a percentage of assessed property value may impact owners in different ways depending on the length of time the property has been owned due to Proposition 13 values. Ordinance Section 2.68.065 provides fora 90-day evaluation period following a disaster during which demolitions are not allowed, unless waived by Council. Demolition permit may require additional 90 days for noticing unless waived by building official for safety reasons. Violation fines have been stated as a set value rather than being set as a percentage of assessed property value. These changes are incorporated into the June 2010 versions of the draft Ordinance. Bob Vessely, Provided input Guidelines which deals with demolition of historic engineer structures. The use of the word "feasible" was questioned and Mr. -15 - Attachment 1 Vessely asked that language be clarified to understand what feasibility referred to — i.e economic versus structural feasibility. Recommends using state eligibility criteria with local adaptation and additional details. CHC added clarification that "feasible"refers to structural feasibility. Local eligibility criteria are now simplified and grouped under California Register Criteria. An integrity provision has been added. Barry Williams, Concurs with comments expressed by Mr. Dettmer. Peer review architect by a consultant would be helpful in order to have someone from outside the community provide insights from a users point of view rather than a regulator's point of view. See responses above. Peer review was accomplished by Chamber-task force comprised of architects, engineers, and attorneys review of documents. Edits have been incorporated in response and are reflected in June 2010 draft Ordinance and Guidelines. Greg Wynn, Pointed out a couple of places where statements should be "or" architect rather than "and" (and visa versa). Asked if eligibility criteria for architect could be changed from "master"to "notable". Also recommended deletion of 2.68.056B(c)— City staff usually provides the noticing list of owners, not the applicant. Changes were made to reflect these corrections. June 2010 drafts reflect changes. 19 Realtors Stock letter(identical language)from 19 separate realtors indicating information from resident in Old Town alerted them to upcoming changes in Historic Preservation Ordinance. Expressed concern that lack of time to review changes has been provided and that consideration of Ordinance be postponed until October. Notification has been provided to all owners of properties on historic resources list for public hearings. CHC hosted eight public hearings/workshops. ARC considered the Guidelines at a separate public hearing. City staff has done outreach through an interested persons email list comprised of 30+contacts, the local AIA, Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Association, Save our Downtown, and through conversations with residents and owners. An Additional workshop scheduled for August 26`" with mailed notice to all owners of properties on Historic Resources list, two display ads in the Tribune and an advertisement on the Community Calendar. Staff provided information at a SLO Association of Realtors meeting on September 7, 2010 and encouraged input and comments. -. 16 - C, attachment 1 Rosemarie Enforcement process is not spelled out and should be. Carrington Staff recommends that language be added to section 2.68.073D to refer to Administrative Code Enforcement procedures and guidelines.. Aug 26 1h Workshop Can City set up menu of penalty fees and relate to violations? For Participant example, could the ordinance address property and building defects under section 2.68.074B and identify the penalty that would apply? Including the ability to assign a $10,000 penalty creates uncertainty. Since every situation varies, it is difficult to assign a pre-set fee for a type of building defect. For example, if a building owner is cited for lack of complying with a request to address building elements that are in a condition where they may fall and injure members of the public, it may be a more serious issue if the building element is the key character-defining feature of a historic building than if it is an unremarkable later addition to that building. The same type of defect on different buildings or in different situations may be more or less critical depending on their individual circumstances. However, like the comment from Ms. Carrington, the enforcement process could be better explained and staff recommends adding language to section 2.68.073D to refer to both the code enforcement procedures and guidelines. The procedures and guidelines set up a progressive enforcement process which first and foremost attempts to achieve owner compliance through staff encouragement and assistance. Penalty fees are used as a last resort. - 17 - _� _ ttachinen 2 .O oA L N cC �I 0 bA O cz p b C) s ti N 151-1, � • G� o .. � � c � Q, � o ti O '- o w 'O CU 1017£6 VD `odsigp sin"IurS. 10-111S WIL'd 616 odsigp sin-I uES3o,44uD ton, u > s w yto E 1 tu ca Z go W cu rA Lu- L 'L .?P b aoi -'v G o a� b 'ce -o o o cu o U -o �ca + i cu „ 'o. U O, O.Q. Q s. 'G -�_ Atlachmen 2 FT U .N 72 0 cz li i �l kr) W ca cn ca All. 'n L) CU a ca cz cn :5 12 .2 E 41 Al ca jo C.4) c"I cd as Leia M a C tt ca cu tz cz LZ 0 (u 0 cz IT At Opp Q ca 0 a. . r o 15. 0 in c) cn .0 , ow rA vl C40 tu U In 0 ra, Cc r— '6w, Ln cz (u CI3 cz �n rA T7-Q'I, 40 C) 0. ca "o pHs Attachment 3 0oo ° � •a U ° -o cs � o •� o, ° w° •i ° o e�C •L �' v w o _ ° � . y o •� r°.n 0 u C 0 .0 x � C°o `° O k 0 w on a� °q U ca 0 .�. "d ° to c O C ° > -Nd aai y ° 'v ° 3 m o 0 3 ° C vCc C .. a w � � i ° yrT CS O L L O 0 °..o a� c p a x ° a M E C a� s s p 3 F- p ° -o 0wl ° p U � w � � _ CD •o ° p: > r� is C� Cu y Z U .O is cNC is U 4. O •0 O w O O i. OCr c� ti v C) Ntn OEli M rA O i.i N Q Tm c > Co 0. A C Q vs U U O, U q O 42 > H C U h Q U U A A w Attachment 3 o `" aTi ° y 0 ° :E t 2 � � CC s, E Y 0 b4 � s •Y y � � � •c � a '� own o Y � y � � �,=, � � ° '� '� '� o •� � •� •o. o eo � o2 al cc O O _ rY M do t+, 7 N .0, 'O .� O O 2 '> VI O ° Y 1, LI .14 u4 •U. .r1 W/ YO O ° o M ' Y o o .E .E E .E � E .E o'; >, > 1 aEi 0. > x x � o°' � � o � •� � a CID a� U E E Co. T c E � M 7r Y L IY� yr o � o as o 0 �o > o > Eo Cy J Attachment 3 w w L O . R p„ CQ y L R Gq N 0 O O O y„� � L .� O . O V a0+ 0 O N R .b L ...� O N N L .' N N .d 7b L epq ooC E s o °o o o°n opn 00 � o °� otooto p 0 0 0 o p p 0 Q o is o c 0o � o c ac6i Q p � a� a� c. a� :° � ci -o •= o 0 o o o 0 0 0❑ � .0 0 . Co O p cOa a Cz C 0 C cd U j N U N N O V uR, N yR„ w C O spm. sem. O � „R,p ••O 7z .� O 'O O •O 'O y0 O b_ YO O b_. � O N O 0 w O v0 Cd O T v •�, cC \ O Q O U O .O > O O •� 00 •� O V1 L O O 0 O O +..' VJ M0 Cu A. N O. 0 03 y d -c • �N � -3a Attachment 3 VVo 0Ca fl y p o Y T T T 003 0 U Cz O O i C cC O U O C k O A O 3 o a •- U -0 b b O C UE ON •� W O O 00 cin � o Yi •- = on Cz �, a. n. •¢, w- y G a0i v , 00 0a0i a0> O 0 4r E Y X .O &4 'C ' U 0 s, U O O O s. 0 O O C N +' w ❑ 4. cYC 0 O cC O O 'L7 O O 0 O eC 0 3 40. - Cn 0 ❑ 4° 3 ° 3 3 ❑ Q Ca Y 0 0r" 0 a0 C'• N y C+" C.' Cz Com+ O —Lt _ ami Cz semCral . cUa v aXi v O U Q. •,� u E 0 a � 0 t S. o o Cz 0 CZ3 >, 5 E > ❑ >, Cz Tai M Co Ca 6. T Cl '� LL ... «2 4. V� .b p i. -d M..Y cfl p O 0 aio �'g + � � o x Q s a M w Q cc v rw r as Hcy > 3x SKS � � Attachment 4 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance The historic McManus House-1901 CHC Draft — June 28, 2010 city or Asan Luis OBISpo Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance � Attachment 4 June 28,2010 �ypN 1AlSG�p _ i v o `!lICEtl,K04 San Luis Obispo City Council Dave Romero-Mayor Allen Settle—Vice Mayor John Ashbaugh—Council Member Andrew Carter—Council Member Jan Howell Marx—Council Member Cultural Heritage Committee Dan Carpenter,Chair Barbara Breska Hemalata Dandekar Katy Davis Buzz Kalkowski bean`Miller Jeff Oliveira,Vice-Chair. City A&mnistrafion Katie Lichtig,City Manager Shelly Stanwyck,Assistant City Manager Brigitte Elke,Administrative Analyst Community Development Department ` John Mandeville,Community Development Director ` Kim Murry,Deputy Director for Long-Range Planning .'Tim Girvin,Chief Building Official ` Jeff Hook,Senior Planner Mary Phillips,Planning Intern Amber Piona,Planning Intern City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-3218 - 1 - Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance J Attachment 4 June 28,2010 San Luis Municipal Code Ch. 2.68 - Cultural Heritage Committee Sections: 2.68.005 Established. 2.68.010 Findings and purpose. 2.68.020 Cultural Heritage Committee. 2.68.030 Duties. 2.68.040 Actions subject to Cultural Heritage Committee review. 2.68.045 Community Director role. 2.68.050 Cultural heritage review procedures. 2.68.060 Post-disaster historic preservation. 2.68.070 Non-compliance with provisions. 2.68.080 Historic Preservation Fund 2.684nO Appeals. Detetea:080 1 2.68 100 Definitions. oeiete -.opo 2.68.005 Established. J A)Cultural Heritage Committee established. There is hereby established the San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC),consisting of seven members appointed by the Council. B) Committee membership. The Committee shall include, whenever possible, a person knowledgeable in local history, a person with training or experience in architectural rehabilitation or restoration,a person with knowledge of architecture or architectural history,and a person knowledgeable in archaeology. 2.68.010 Findings and Purpose. 2.68.011 Findings. The Council hereby finds that: The City of San Luis Obispo has a distinctive physical character and rich history that are reflected in its many cultural resources, such as historic structures and sites. These irreplaceable resources are important to the community's economic vitality, quality of life, and sense of place and need protection from deterioration, damage,and inappropriate alteration or demolition. 2.68.012 Purpose. The broad purpose of this ordinance is to promote the public health, safety and welfare through the identification, protection, enhancement and preservation of those properties, structures, sites, artifacts and other cultural resources that represent distinctive elements of San Luis Obispo's cultural,educational,social, economic, political and architectural history. Specifically,this ordinance sets forth regulations and procedures to: -2- Draft Historic Preservation OrdinanceAttachment 4 June 28,2010 A. Identify, protect, preserve, and promote the continuing use and upkeep of San Luis Obispo's historic structures,sites and districts. B. Foster the retention and restoration of historic buildings and other cultural resources that promote tourism,economic vitality,sense of place,and diversity. C. Encourage private stewardship of historic buildings and other cultural resources through incentives where possible. D. Implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. E. Promote the conservation of valuable material and embodied energy in historic structures through their continued use, restoration and repair, and on-going maintenance of historic resources. F. Promote the knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City's distinctive character,cultural resources and history. G. Establish the procedures and significance criteria to be applied when evaluating development project effects on historic resources. H. Fulfill the City's responsibilities as a Certified Local Government under State and Federal regulations and for Federal Section 106 reviews. 2.68.020 Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC). 2.68.021 Committee membership and terms. The CulturalHeritageCommittee (the "CHC'? or"Committee") shall be appointed by the City Council.("Council")and consist of seven members who are appointed for terms of up to four years which shall commence immediately upon appointment by the Council. 2.68.022 Removal and reappointment. Committee members.shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and may be reappointed,provided that no appointee shall'serve'more than two consecutive full terms(eight years). Appointment to a partial term of office,following an unscheduled vacancy shallnot preclude the appointee from serving two consecutive full terms following completion of the partial term; provided that the partial term is less than two years. 2.68.030 Duties. The CHC shall: A. Establish and maintain historic and cultural resource preservation standards and guidelines for the use by persons planning development projects subject to Cultural Heritage Committee -3 - -P Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 review, and for guiding City and property owner decisions regarding cultural resources in San Luis Obispo. B. Identify and recommend to the Council those properties, areas, sites, buildings, structures or other features having significant historical, cultural, architectural, community, scientific or aesthetic value to the citizens of San Luis Obispo. C. Maintain and update the Master and Contributing Properties Lists of Historic Resources, and Historic Property and Archaeological Site Inventories. D. Review and make recommendations to decision makers on actions that may affect significant archaeological,cultural or historic resources. E. Advise and assist property owners, developers and staff in the application of architectural, historic and cultural preservation standards and guidelines to projects and approvals involving historic sites,districts and structures. F. Collect and consolidate information about cultural resources and promote, participate in, or sponsor educational and interpretive programs which foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources. G. Provide advice and guidance on the restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping and maintenance of listed resources,and properties within Historic preservation districts. H. Administer incentive programs approved by the Council that are directed at preserving and maintaining cultural resources. I. Assist property owners with the preparation of'local, state and federal historic nominations to enable property owners to utilize preservation incentives, including the Mills Act and federal tax incentives such as rehabilitation tax credits. J. Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Body Handbook and perform other duties as assigned by Council. 2.68.040 Actions Subject to Cultural Heritage Committee Review. The Committee shall review and make recommendations on the following actions: A.Changes to the Inventory of Historic Resources. B.Changes to historic districts and applications to establish new historic districts. C. Statements of historic significance and historic inventories for existing and proposed historic districts. -4- 00 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance ' Attachment 4 June 28,2010 D. New construction, additions or alterations located in or adjacent to historic districts, or at historically listed properties,or sensitive archaeological sites. E.Applications to demolish or relocate listed resources or structures. F Projects and actions referred to the Committee by the Community Development Director ("Director'),Architectural Review Commission,Planning Commission,or Council. G.Actions of public agencies that may affect historic or cultural resources within the City. 2.68.045 Community Development Director Role The CHC is assisted by staff of the Community Development Department. The Community Development Director ("Director') is responsible for interpreting and implementing this ordinance and helping the CHC carry out its duties. Notwithstanding Section 2.68.040 of this ordinance, the Director may determine that CHC review is not required for actions or projects that: 1)do not adversely affect historic resources,or 2)are consistent with this ordinance and the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and no public purpose would be served by requiring CHC review. 2.68.050 Cultural Heritage Review Procedures. The Committee shall prepare and maintain Historic and Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines that-implement this ordinance and set forth the guidelines for cultural heritage review. These documents shall require Council approval. A record copy of the guidelines shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in the Community Development Department. Copies shall be available on the City's website and printed versions will be available at cost. 2.68.051 Resource Designation The following classifications are used to designate historic resources and properties. The primary categories of historic significance are"Master List" and"Contributing"properties. The Master List includes the City's most important historic resources in terms of age,architectural or historical significance, rarity, or association with important persons or events in the City's past. Contributing properties include those properties that by virtue of their age, design and appearance, contribute to and embody the historic character of the historic district or neighborhood in which they are located. A. Master List Resources. The most unique and important resources and properties meeting one or more of the criteria outlined in Section 2.68.053. B.Contributing Resources.Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by themselves or in -5- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance _ Attachment 4 June 28,2010 conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole. They need not be located in a historic district, but should be visible to the public. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described in Section 2.68.053 may be designated as a Contributing Resource. C.Non-Contributing.Buildings,properties and other features.in historic districts which are less than 50 years old,have not retained their original architectural character, or which do not support the prevailing historic character of the district. D. Threatened Structures: Structures or features at imminent risk of alteration, removal or relocation, or loss of historic significance through neglect. The Director or CHC may designate Threatened Structures, based on the criteria in Section 2.68.053, for a period not to exceed six months to allow sufficient time to evaluate the significance of the structure. During this period, demolition will not be allowed. 2.68.052 Listing Procedures for Historic Resources A. Application for historic listing. The property owner may initiate the process for a resource to be added to the Master or Contributing List of Historic resources by submitting a completed application to the Community Development Department ("Department"), accompanied by all available information documenting the historic significance and architectural character of the resource. This process can also be initiated by the CHC, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council. B. Review process. The CHC shall review applications for historic listing. If the CHC determines an application may meet eligibility criteria for historic listing, a public hearing will be scheduled by the Department and the Director shall provide notification as required by City standards. At.the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the hearing date, the CHC shall"forward`a recommendation on the application to the City Council. The City Council Will take an action on the.application to add or not add the resource to the Master or Contributing List of Historic Resources. The decision of the City Council is final. C.Removal from historic listing.It is the general intention of the City to not remove a property from historic fisting. Council may, however, rezone a property to remove Historic Overlay Zoning, or remove the property from historic listing if the structure on the property no longer meets eligibility criteria for listing, following the process for listing set forth herein. 2.68.053. Evaluation Criteria for Historic Resource Listing When determining if a property should be designated as a listed Historic or Cultural Resource, the CHC and City Council shall consider this ordinance and State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO")standards. In order to be eligible for designation the resource shall exhibit a high level of historic integrity, be at least fifty (50) years old (less than 50 if it can be demonstrated that enough time has passed to understand its historical importance) and satisfy at least one of the -6- o Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance _ J Attachment 4 June 28,2010 following criteria: A. Architectural Criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. (a) Style: Describes the form of a building, such as size, structural shape and details within that form (e.g. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.). Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: (i) The relative purity of a traditional style; (ii) Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects a once popular style; (iii) Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid styles and how these styles are put together. (b) Design: Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the designer (e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building design will be evaluated as a measure of: (i) Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details and craftsmanship(even if not necessarily unique); (ii) An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. (cc)Architect: Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the building design and plans of the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to: (i) A notable architect (e.g., Wright, Morgan), including architects who made significant contributions to the state or region, or an architect whose work influenced development of the city,state or nation. (ii)An architect who, in terns of craftsmanship, made significant contributions to San Luis Obispo(e.g.,Abrahams who,according to local sources,designed the house at 810 Osos-Frank Avila's father's home-built between 1927—30). (d) Sign: A sign which contributes to the unique architectural or historic character of a building, site or historic district may be designated as a historic sign. Signs that meet at least one of the following criteria may be designated historic: -7- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 i) The sign is exemplary of technology, craftsmanship or design of the period when it was constructed, uses historic sign materials and means of illumination, and is not significantly altered from its historic period. Historic sign materials shall include metal or wood facings,or paint directly on the faoade of a building.Historic means of illumination shall include incandescent light fixtures or neon tubing on the exterior of the sign. If the sign has been altered, it must be restorable to its historic function and appearance. ii) The sign is well integrated with the site and/or architecture of the building. iii) A sign not meeting either criterion may be considered for inclusion in the inventory if it demonstrates extraordinary aesthetic quality,creativity,or innovation. B.Historic Criteria (a)History—Person: Associated with the lives,of persons important to local, California or national history. Historic person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: (i) Significant to the community as a public leader (e.g., mayor, congress member, etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition - locally, regionally, or nationally. (ii) Significant to the community as a public servant or person—who made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to the community, important local affairs or institutions (e.g., council members,educators, medical professionals, clergymen, railroad officials). (b)History—Event: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.'Historic event will be evaluated as a measure of: (i) A landmark, famous, or first-of-its-kind event for the city- regardless of whether the impact of the evenVsprea$beyond the city. (ii)A relati've,ly unique, important or interesting contribution to the city(e.g., the Ah Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American cultural activities in early San Luis Obispo history). (c) History-Context: Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical, educational, governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: -8 - Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance _ _J Attachment 4 June 28,2010 (i) Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building(e.g., County Museum). (ii)Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the building (e.g., Park Hotel). C. Integrity: Authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity will be evaluated by a measure of: (a) Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. (b) The degree to which the structure has maintained enough of its his character or appearance to be recognizable as an historic resource and to convey the reason(s) for its significance. (c) The degree to which the resource has retained its design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. 2.68.054 Historic Gardens,Site Features,and Other Cultural Resources A. Historic Site and landscape features. Historic gardens, site features and improvements, accessory structures, signs, Native American Sacred Places, cultural landscapes and areas or objects of archaeological, architectural, cultural or historic significance not part of a designated property may be added to the Inventory of Historic Resources through CHC review as specified herein. B. Cultural Resources on public property. Cultural and historic features on public property, such as Bishop's Peak granite walls and curbing, sidewalk embossing, ornamental manhole covers and hitching posts, may be added to the Inventory of Historic Resources through CHC review as specified herein. 2.68.055 Historic District Designation,Purpose and Application A.Historic(H)District designation. All properties within historic districts shall be designated by an"H"zoning. Properties zoned"H"shall be subject to the provisions and standards as provided in Ordinance 17.54 of the Municipal Code. B.Purposes of Historic Districts.The purposes of historic districts and H zone designation are to: -9- Nis ^ q3 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance `._. _ Attachment 4 June 28,2010 (a) Implement cultural resource preservation policies of the General Plan, the preservation provisions of adopted area plans, the Historic Preservation and Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines,and (b)Identify and preserve_definable,unified geographical entities that possess a significant concentration, linkage,or continuity of sites,buildings,structures,or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development; (c) Implement historic preservation provisions of adopted area and neighborhood improvement plans; (d) Enhance and preserve the setting of historic resources so thatsurrounding land uses and structures do not detract from the historic or architectural integrity of designated historic resources and districts;and (e)Promote the public understanding and appreciation of historic resources. C.Eligibility for incentives. Properties designated as Historic Preservation(H)shall be eligible for preservation incentive and benefit programs as established herein, in the Guidelines and other local,state and federal programs. D. Where applied. The (H) designation may be applied to areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, or where historic properties help define an area or neighborhood's unique architectural and historic character or sense of place. E."H" district combined. A Historic Preservation Overlay District(H) may be combined with any zoning district,and shall be shown by adding an"H"to the base zone designation. H district boundaries shall'be drawn to follow property lines or right-of-way lines, and as set forth in the Zoning Regulations: . F. Statement of historic significance.A Historic (H) designation shall include a statement of historic significance as described herein, and be prepared by a qualified professional,as listed in the City's List of Qualified Historians. 2.68.056 Process for Establishing or Amending Historic Districts: A. Initiating or amending Historic Districts. Any person may initiate the process to establish or alter the boundaries of a historic district. The process can also be initiated by the CHC, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council. B. Application. An application to establish or alter the boundaries of a Historic Preservation District shall be submitted to the Department. The application shall meet the requirements for rezoning as described in the Zoning Regulations. The application and supporting information and plans shall be submitted to the Department and shall include: - 10- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 (a) A map (8-1/2" x 11") from the official zoning map, with the area to be changed shaded.or outlined in a heavy, black line, with the proposed area to be changed clearly labeled,and (b) Information showing how the application meets the criteria to establish or alter a historic district designation. C. Review. The CHC shall review the application and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall review the CHC recommendation and rezoning application and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall review the application and the recommendations of the CHC and Planning Commission, and approve or disapprove the application. The CHC, Planning.Commis"sion and the City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the application and the notice'of such hearings shall be completed as provided in the City's Notification Procedures. D. Review criteria. When considering a Historic Preservation District application, the reviewing body shall consider the following criteria: (a) Environmental Design Continuity: Describes the inter-relationship of structures and their relationship to a common environment;Refers to the continuity,spatial relationship, and visual character of a street, neighborhood, or area. Environmental design continuity is comprised of: (i) Symbolic importance to the community of a key structure in the area-and the degree to which it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (e:g., easily accessible to the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place);or (ii) Compatibility of a-structures with neighboring structures in their setting on the basis of period; style (form, height, roof lines), design elements, landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting;or (iii) Similarity to and/or compatibility of structures over 50 years of age_which, collectively;combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive character,and (b)Whether the proposed district contains structures which meet criteria for inclusion on the City's Lists of Historic Resources. 2.68.057 Historic District Documentation: A.Documentation required.. Statements of Historic Significance, as described herein, shall be adopted by the CHC at an advertised public hearing prior to recommending designation of a - 11 - Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 historic district. Designation of a historic district shall require rezoning with an "H" overlay zone, as described in Zoning Regulations(Ch. 17, SLOMC). Statements of historic significance shall be reviewed by the CHC at an advertised public hearing. Statements associated with an application to modify an existing district shall be adopted following the same public hearing and notification requirements. B. Contents. Statements of Historic Significance shall include, but not be limited to the following; (a)A visual and written description of the district's boundaries. (b)A description of the district's architectural and historic character. (c) A description of the district's architectural, historic, and cultural resources and significance, including a historic survey documenting the period of significance and how historic properties meet adopted local, state and where applicable, federal criteria for historic listing. (d)Preservation goals and concerns for the district including but not limited to; i) Identification of preservation priorities, important features, goals and objectives, and ii)Identification of prominent or unique obstacles to preservation,and iii)Identification of historic land use policies and goals for future land use,and iv) Special considerations for development review of projects both involving and not involving historic resources. (e) Graphic and written design guidelines applicable to the district's preservation goals, historic character and features which shall include,but not be limited to: (i), Guidelines for projects involving historic resources, focused on preserving the district's character and significant archeological, architectural, and historic features; and (ii)Guidelines for projects within the district but not involving historically designated properties, focused on maintaining street character and compatibility with the district s'histonc character while not mimicking historic styles. 2.68.060 Post-Disaster Historic Preservation. Contents: 2.68.061 Purpose and goals. 2.68.062 Emergency Response Committee(ERC)established. 2.68.063 Provisions and fee waiver. 2.68.064 Stabilization of historic buildings. 2.68.065 Demolition of historic buildings. 2.68.066 City assistance. - 12- ��S � J Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 2.68.061 Purpose and goals. Purpose: California is a seismically active area. State-wide experience shows that earthquakes can seriously damage or destroy important historic buildings. The 2003 San Simeon Earthquake and 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake demonstrated that historic buildings can be lost through actions taken by public agencies after an earthquake. These actions usually occur within ten days after a declared emergency. This would also apply to damage by fire, wind and flood. The purpose of these regulations is to facilitate recovery following a disaster in a way that balances the need to protect public health and safety, the economic interests of property owners and the need to preserve the community's most important historic buildings. These standards implement and are consistent with California Public Resources Code _Section 5028 pertaining to natural disaster damage to historic properties. Goals: It is the goal of the City of San Luis Obispo to: (a) Continue to identify and designate archetypal or particularly significant historical structures within the City of San Luis Obispo. Such properties are identified by the Council as having the highest historical value by virtue of their unique architectural,historical or cultural significance, and are included in the Master List of Historic Resources. (b) Continue to preserve Master List resources and provide for their stabilization, restoration and/or reconstruction in the event of a disaster such.as earthquake,fire,windstorm,or flooding. (c) Establish post-disaster historic preservation procedures that are consistent with state and local law,and specifically SLOMC Section 15.48;and (d) Establish an Emergency Response Committee that will develop, implement and monitor procedures for stabilization or demolition of Master List buildings which are damaged by an earthquake or other disaster. (e) Integrate post-disaster'historic preservation with the City's disaster planning and emergency response protocols. 2.68.062 Emergency Response Committee(ERC)established. (a) The Council hereby establishes an "Emergency Response Committee" (ERC). The ERC's membership shall consist of: i)Community Development Director("Director") ii)City Engineer iii)Chief Building Official iv)Fire Marshall v)Cultural Heritage Committee member vi)Citizen Architect or Engineer 13 - T Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 (b) The Council, upon the recommendation of the Committee shall appoint members under subsection (a)(v) and (a)(vi), and shall appoint alternates for both positions. Committee members shall serve on a volunteer basis for 2-4 year terms. (c) City officials on the Committee may be represented by their designees. The ERC shall meet as-needed, and shall be convened by the Director. All decisions shall require a majority vote of the quorum of ERC members. A quorum shall consist of four Committee members. (d) The citizen architect or engineer should be knowledgeable in historic building construction and preservation methods,to assist the City and owners of historically-listed buildings. (e) The citizen architect or engineer should be registered as a Disaster Service Worker with the Office of Emergency Services. 2.68.063 Provisions and fee waiver. If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster, the following provisions shall guide actions of the City and owners of Master List properties: City development review and permit fees for restoration or reconstruction of Master List properties may be reduced or waived by the City Council to facilitate preservation of significant historic resources and to expedite recovery from the disaster. 2.68.064 Stabilization of historic buildings. Within the first 90 days of a disaster, the City shall work with the property owners and all agencies concerned for the shoring and stabilization of Master List buildings that the ERC or Chief Building Official determines.to be hazardous buildings. The following provisions shall apply unless waived by.the Council: (a)As per SLOMC 15.48,placards shall be used to identify buildings the Chief Building Officer determines to be restricted or unsafeto occupy. In addition, buildings on the Master List of Historic Resources that are determined to be restricted or unsafe to occupy shall be clearly labeled by the City with the words "Master List Historic Building- This Placard is not a Demolition Order. -� (b)Members of the ERC shall be"on-call"as stated in Section 2.68.062(d),and should be able to assist disaster personnel and advise owners on emergency stabilization measures for Master List resources,consistent with City authority granted by law under emergency conditions. (c) City shall maintain a list of qualified architects and engineers, and make the list available to owners of Master List resources,to assist in preparing shoring and stabilization programs. (d) Owners of Master List resources shall submit a written report prepared by a qualified architect or engineer, outlining shoring and stabilization measures to be taken to the ERC for - 14- Attachment 4 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance June 28,2010 review and recommendation to the Chief Building Official for approval. (e) Members of the ERC, owners of Master List buildings, and owners' representatives shall have physical access to hazardous Master List buildings, at the Community Development Director's discretion, to recommend appropriate shoring and stabilization measures to be undertaken to the Chief Building Official. (f) Stabilization actions should occur within the time period specified by the ERC. A construction permit shall be obtained for stabilization actions, unless the requirement is waived by the City or is exempt from permit requirements. 2.68.065 Demolition of historic buildings. If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster, demolition of the structure may be authorized under the provisions of the California Building Code(CBC)and under following provisions: The issuance of a demolition permit is governed by the provisions of this ordinance, which shall serve as local amendments to the procedures contained in the CBC. Removal or destruction of any character-defining feature of a Master List building, as determined by the Director or Chief Building Official, constitutes a demolition. Recommendations regarding stabilization methods and emergency demolition shall be made by the ERC. (a) Within 90 days of the initial date of the disaster,demolition permits shall not be issued unless the Director or Chief Building Official, upon the recommendation of the ERC, determines that earlier demolition is necessary to: i)eliminate an imminent,demonstrable threat to human life and/or undamaged property on adjacent streets or sites;or ii)provide access for emergency vehicles and personnel where no alternative route or service strategy is available. (b) After'90 calendar days followipg the initial date of the disaster, the issuance of demolition permit for a'Master List building is subject to the normal permit processing procedures for demolition or relocation of historic buildings. The CHC shall make a recommendation to the Architectural Review Commission regarding demolition of Master List buildings. To recommend approval of a demolition permit application, the CHC must determine that: i) The historic resource is a hazard to public health or safety, and repairs, stabilization, preservation or rehabilitation is not structurally feasible. Deterioration resulting from the neglect or failure of the owner to maintain the property need not be considered in making this finding. The applicant shall provide one or more structural reports to document that repairs or stabilization are not feasible. - 15 - Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 ii) Denial of the application will deprive the property owner of the economically viable use of the property, after application of financial, land use and other incentives available to the property. ii) The proposed demolition is consistent with the General Plan and the California Environmental Quality Act. (c) To assist in the determination required by subsection (b), property owners shall submit a written report prepared by a licensed architect or engineer, knowledgeable in historic building construction,assessing the condition of the damaged building and evaluating strategies and costs for its restoration or reconstruction. i) As a condition of any permit to demolish a Master List building or portion thereof that remains after a disaster, the owner shall provide photo-documentation to the Director showing building setbacks from property line, floor area,height,exterior architectural details, building form and materials, in a form acceptable to the CHC. ii) The ERC or CHC shall use photo-documentation to determine if any architectural features should be saved for reuse on the reconstructed building. If the property owner is unwilling or unable to save the identified architectural features, the City may, at its option, store the features for later use, consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines,with the agreement of the property owner. Cost of City storage of the features if any will be borne by the property owner. iii) The ERC reserves the right to consider third-party assessments of the structural condition of the Master List building prepared by qualified professionals. 2.68.066 City assistance: To assist owners of buildings on the Master List of Historic Resources with stabilization, restoration and reconstruction work,the'City shall: (a)Maintain photographic records of the exteriors of Master List buildings. (b) Give priority to the processing of applications and the issuance of building permits for restoration and reconstruction work. (c) Provide and distribute information brochures to local disaster personnel and Master List building owners with information describing funding sources, policies, and laws applicable to historical buildings, seismic hazard mitigation and response strategies, and historic preservation measures following a disaster. (d) Make available any of the applicable benefits listed in Chapter 4 of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. - 16- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance i� l Attachment 4 June 28,2010 2.68.070 Non-Compliance With Provisions Contents: 2.68.071 Severability 2.68.072 Legal authority and enforcement 2.68.073 Enforcement 2.68.074 Historic Property Yrotection Standards oetetea:tiamc��c� 2.68.075 Economic Hardship 2.68.076 Historic and cultural resources trust fund 2.68.071 Severability. Should any section or other portion of this ordinance be determined unlawful or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining section(s) and portion(s) of this ordinance shall be considered severable and shall remain in full force and effect. 2.68.072 Legal authority and enforcement. A. Authority. The Director, Chief Building Official, City Attorney, Cultural Heritage Committee, Council and their designees are hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. B. Fees. Council shall,by resolution, establish the fee(s)for applications and submissions made pursuant to this ordinance, fines, and fees for non:conformance with this ordinance and adopted Historic Preservation Program guidelines. C.Time to correct. Director shall provide written notice of non-compliance to property owners. Notice;shall be by certified mail or other method approved by the City attorney. Following receipt of notice, property owner shall have 30 days to correct the violation. Additional time to correct the violation may be allowed by the Chief Building Official where appropriate. Failure to demonstrate timely response to correct the violation may result in enforcement penalties. 2.68.073 Enforcement. A. Violations.Violating the provisions of this ordinance or of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, failure to obey an order issued by those authorized to enforce it, or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any discretionary City approval, certificate or permit issued under this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. B. Failure to protect property. No property owner or other responsible party shall cause or permit, by action or inaction,alteration of, damage to, deterioration, or demolition of in whole or part,of any significant features or characteristics of a listed historic property or resource without first having obtained proper city authorization. - 17- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 C.Work stoppage. In addition to any other fines, penalties or enforcement provisions set forth in this ordinance, failure to comply in any respect with an approved application shall constitute grounds for immediate stoppage of the work involved in the noncompliance until the matter is resolved. D. Penalties. The City shall use procedures described in Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code and Administrative Citation Guidelines if any fines are imposed in conjunction with enforcement of these regulations. Following notice and public hearing, the Council, may enforce the following penalties for violations of this ordinance: (a) Fine. The owner of the listed historic property may be assessed a one time fine of up to $10,000 per violation, as established by Council. In addition, the City may assess a fine ranging from $100 to $5,000 per day, up to a maximum of 30 days, for continuing violations. (b) Building permit restriction. City may prohibit the owner(s), successors, or assigns from obtaining a building permit for the subject property fora period of up to five (�)) years from the date of violation, unless such permit(s) is for the purpose of correcting a building or zoning code violation or for complying with provisions of this ordinance. City shall initiate proceedings to place a deed restriction on the property to ensure enforcement of this -restriction._The property owner shall be required to maintain the property during that period _ Deleted:peachy in conformance withstandards set forth in this ordinance. _ Deleted:ma ntenance _ (c)Loss of preservation benefits. Any historic preservation benefits previously granted to the property may be subject to revocation. (d) Restoration required. Any responsible party who demolishes or alters a property or structure in violation of this ordinance may be required to restore the property or structure to its appearance prior to the violation to the satisfaction of the Director. This shall be in addition'to and not in lieu of any criminal prosecution and penalty,and applicable fines. (e) Other remedies. In addition to any other penalty authorized by law, failure to protect a - Deleted:a afa a n historic resource may constitute a public nuisance resulting in the issuance of an order that the Deteted_�heproperry u�i owner perform�t &maintenance necessary to comply with this section. Any failure to comply with such an order shall entitle the City to cause the maintenance to be performed at the owner's expense and in addition to the penalties provided by this code for violation thereof, such cost may be recovered of such owner or occupant by civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. In addition,any such costs shall become a lien against the property. The fines and penalties contained herein are non-exclusive and are in addition to any other remedies the City may have. 2.68.074 Historic Property.Protection Standards Deleted:Nlarntenanm 18- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 A. Preservation of listed historic resources. To prevent their deliberate or inadvertent neglect and potential loss, the property owner shall maintain listed historic resources in good repair, preserved against vandalism, unauthorized entry, decay and deterioration, and free from structural defects and safety hazards, consistent with the Property Maintenance Standards (SLOMC Ch. 17.17),Community Design Guidelines,and standards as specified herein. B. Property and building defects. The property owner of a listed historic property shall promptly repair the property if it is found to have any of the following defects-which could result in loss of historic integrity of the resource: (1) Building elements in a condition that they may fall or otherwise damage property or injure members of the public. (2) Deteriorated, defective or inadequate foundation, flooring or floor supports causing exterior signs of structural failure,such as those listed in 3,4,and 5 below. (3) Members of walls, partitions or other vertical supports that split, lean, list or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (4)Members of ceilings or roofs, ceiling or roof supports or other horizontal members which sag,split,or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (5) Fireplaces or chimneys which list, bulge, or settle due to defective materials or deterioration. (6)Deteriorated,crumbling or loose exterior plaster. (7) Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, including broken windows ordoors. (8) Defective or insufficient,weather protection for exterior wall covering, including lack of paint or other protective covering. (9) Any fault,,'defect or deterioration in the building which renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight. (10) Unsecured windows,doors or other openings that allow unauthorized entrance or use of building or site. (11) Excessive trash, debris, un-maintained landscaping or other conditions that in the opinion of the Director or Chief Building Official may pose a public nuisance or hazard, or adversely affect the safety and condition of the property or adjacent properties. C. Imminent threat. If the Community Development Director or the Chief Building Official determines there is an imminent threat to a listed historic or cultural resource, the property owner - 19- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance -- Attachment 4 June 28,2010 shall be required to provide urgent measures for the protection of the resource within 72 hours of notification, including, but not limited to the securing of building openings, roof or wall repairs, fencing; site lighting, site clean up, private security services, or other measures deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the resource and public health and safety. D. Demolition by neglect. If the Director, Chief Building Official, or the CHC determines a listed historic or cultural resource is being adversely affected due to neglect, the property owner or other person having legal custody and control of the resource shall be directed to take actions necessary to repair damage, protect and stabilize the property, and prevent further damage or deterioration. If, in the determination of the Director; Chief Building Official or the CHC, insufficient effort is made to correct the problem within 30 days of written notice to the property owner,the Director or the Chief Building Official shall initiate enforcement action. 2.68.075 Economic Hardship. If the applicant presents evidence clearly demonstrating to the satisfaction of the CHC or the City Council that the CHC's action will cause an extreme hardship because of conditions peculiar to the particular structure or other feature involved, the CHC may recommend approval, and the Council may approve or conditionally approve a demolition or other application to modify a listed historic resource even though it does not meet one or more standards set forth herein. The applicant shall bear the burden of proving the extreme hardship and shall provide substantiation of the claim to the CHC, which shall then make a recommendation to the Council on the hardship request. The CHC is authorized to request that the applicant furnish additional information, documentation.and expert testimony, the cost of .which shall be paid by the applicant, to be considered by the Committee in its related findings. All additional required information shall_be provided by a qualified individual or firm selected by the City. In determining whether extreme hardship exists, the Committee and Council shall consider evidence that demonstrates: (a)Denial of the application,wilI diminish the value of the subject property so as to leave substantially no value; or (b)Sale or rental of the property is impractical, when compared to the cost of holding such property for uses permitted in the zoning district;or i/ (c)Utilization of the property for lawful purposes is prohibited or impractical;or (d)Rental at a reasonable rate of return is not feasible. 2.68,.080 13istonc and cultural resourceP reservation fund established. Formatted: Font. 14 pt — — -' [Deleted:076 � The Historic and Cultural Resource Preservation Fund ("Fund") is hereby established to Formatted: Font. to Pt J provide for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic and ,Formatted Font la pt . ....... .... —........... cultural resources in the City of San Luis Obispo. The Council shall provide the policy direction for expenditures from the Fund. 20 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment June 28,2010 A. Program Administration. The Director shall administer the Fund, following specific procedures and funding priorities adopted by the Council. B. Purpose. The purpose of the Fund is to provide funds for historic preservation projects within the City. All funds deposited in the Fund shall be used for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic or cultural resources,as provided in this section and as directed by the Council 1. Financial Administration. Financial administration of the Fund shall be by the City Finance Director or his designee, in accordance with State and local law. Any interest earned on the fund shall accrue to the funds, unless Council specifically designates such funds for another purpose. 2. Giants,Gifts and Donations. The Finance Director shall deposit into the fund any grants, gifts, donations, rents, royalties, or other financial support earmarked by Council for historic or cultural resource preservation. C. Cultural Heritage Committee Role. The Committee shall advise the Council on the Fund regarding: 1. Criteria for use and award of funds; , 2. Entering into any contract,lease,agreement,etc.for use of funds; 3. Any other';action or activity necessary or appropriate to achieve the Fund purposes.and the intent of this ordinance. D. Uses of Fund. The Fund may be used for. 1) the identification and protection of cultural resources, including preparation'of historic surveys and design guidelines, 2)- for the 'repair, 'restoration, rehabilitation, preservation and maintenance of historical buildings, features, or archaeological sites, 3) for public education on cultural resources,''4) for real property acquisition, including lease, purchase, sale, exchange or other forms of real property transfer or acquisition to protect significant historic resources, or 5) any other purpose approved by the Council provided that Council determines such actions are necessary to preserve the resource and in the best interests of the City. Council decisions on the use of funds are final. E. Loans and Grants. The Fund may be used, upon Council approval and recommendation by the Committee, for loans and grants to public agencies, nonprofit organizations and private entities to carry out the purposes of this ordinance. F. Preservation Agreements. Loans, grants or other financial assistance shall require execution of an agreement between the City and the recipient to ensure that such award or assistance carries out the purposes of this ordinance and is consistent with applicable State and local standards. _21 _ Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 G. Funding Eligibility: The Fund shall be used to benefit properties on the Master or Contributing Properties List, or for other properties or uses deemed eligible by the Council upon recommendation by the Committee. 2.68,090 Appeals {Deleted:oso Decisions of the Director or Committee are appealable to the Council and shall be filed with the City Clerk. Action on appeals shall be considered at a public hearing, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1.20 of the Municipal Code. Where applicable, claims of economic hardship shall include sufficient evidence documenting that ordinance enforcement would cause serious economic deprivation to the property owner(s). -22- ID[� 6 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance J Attachment 4 June 28,2010 2.68400 DefinitionS. For the purposes of this ordinance, certain terms,_words and their ,. iDeleted:090 ---- 1 derivatives shall be defined as specified herein; 1.Accessory Structure: a structure which is subordinate or incidental and directly related to a permitted use or structure on the same parcel. "Accessory structures" that include habitable space, as defined by the California Building Code, shall be no larger than 450 square feet. (Ord. 941-1(part), 1982: prior code—9204.11 (part)) "Accessory structures" are located on the same parcel and are related to the primary structure but are subordinate or incidental, but may include structures that have achieved historic significance in their own right, as determined by the Director,Committee or Council.(see"primary structure") 2. Adjacent: located on property which abuts the subject property on at least one point of the property line, on the same property, or located on property directly across right-of-way from subject property and able to viewed concurrently. 3.Adverse Effects: effects,impacts or actions that are detrimental or potentially detrimental to a historic resource's condition,architectural or historical integrity. 4 Alteration: any change, repair, replacement, modification, or new construction to: (1) the exterior of an historic resource or adjacent building, (2) the exterior and interior structural elements which support the exterior walls,'roof, or exterior elements of the historic resource or adjacent building,(3)other construction on a lot,or(4)Character Defining Features of the interior of a historic resource, unless the interior is exempt from historic review by the Cultural Heritage Committee."Alteration" does not include ordinary landscape maintenance unless the landscaping is identified as significant at the time a property is listed, receives historic"IT'zoning;or is identified in an adopted historic preservation report. 5. Archaeological Site: those areas where archaeological resources are present and may be larger or smaller-than.the project site. An archaeological site may include prehistoric Native American archaeological site;.Historic archaeological sites• sites or natural landscapes associated-_with important human events,and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes. 6.ARC: the Architectural Review Commission as appointed by the City Council. 7. California Register: California Register of Historical Resources defined in California PRC 5024.1 and in CCR Title 14 Chap 11.5, See 4850 et seq.as it may be amended. 8.CHC:the Cultural Heritage Committee as appointed by the City Council. 9. Character Defining Features: as outlined in the U.S. Department of the Interior's National Register Bulletin 15 and Preservation Brief 17: "How to Identify Character Defining Features", the architectural character and general composition of a resource, including, but not limited to, type and texture of building material; type, design, and character of all windows, doors, stairs, porches, railings, molding and other appurtenant elements; and fenestration, ornamental detailing,elements of craftsmanship,finishes;etc. -23 - Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 10.City: the City of San Luis Obispo. 11. Community Design Guidelines: the most recent version of the City's Community Design Guidelines as adopted and amended from time to time. 12.Contributing Resource: Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole.. They need not be located in a historic district,but should be visible to the public. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanshipor other criteria as described herein may be designated as a Contributing resource. 13.Council: the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo. 14.Cultural Resource: any prehistoric or historic district, site, landscape, building, structure, or object included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation, including artifacts,records,and material remains related to such a property or resource. 15. Demolition: for the purpose of this ordinance,"demolition"refers to any act or failure to act that destroys, removes,or relocates, in whole or part a historical resource such that its historic or architectural character and significance are materially altered. 16. Deterioration: the significant worsening of a structure's condition, architectural or historic integrity, due to lack of maintenance,organisms,neglect, weathering and other natural forces. 17. Director: the Director of the Community 'Development Department, or another person authorized by the Director to act on.his of her behalf. 18. Disaster: "Disaster" shall include fire, flood, earthquake, landslide, subsidence, tsunami, acts of war or civil unrest,or other catastrophic event as declared by the Council, the Governor of the Staie.of California or the President of the United States. 19. Feasible: capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account cultural, economic, environmental, historic, legal, social and technological factors. 20.Historic Building Code: the most recent version of the California Historical Building Code, Title 25, Part, 8, as defined in Sections 18950 to 18961 of Division 12, Part 2.7 of Health and Safety Code (H&SC), a part of California State law. Its purpose is to provide regulations and standards for the rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related reconstruction) or relocation as applicable to all historical buildings, structures and properties deemed of -24- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 importance to the history, architecture, or culture of an area by an appropriate local or state governmental jurisdiction. 21. Historic Context: Historic context are those patterns, themes or trends in history by which a specific occurrence,property, or site is understood and its meaning and significance is made clear. 22.Historic DistricUHistorical Preservation District: areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, where historic properties help define the area or neighborhood's unique architectural, cultural, and historic character or sense of place. Historic districts may be, delineated on the official zoning map as Historic (H) overlay zone under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.54. 23. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: the most recent version of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines,as adopted from time to time. 24. Historic Preservation Report. a document which describes preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction measures for a historic resource, based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, and which includes standards and guidelines for recommended treatments for preserving the resource. A historic preservation report shall require approval by the CHC and the approval shall remain in effect for a period of at least three years from the approval date. The Director or on referral from the Director, the CHC may extend or re-adopt an approved program for a period of up to ten years. 25. Historic Property: a property, including land and buildings, which possesses aesthetic, architectural, cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local,State or National historic designation. 26.Historic Resource: any building,site, improvement,area or object of aesthetic,architectural, cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local,State or National historic designation. 27.Historic Status: historic designation of a listed resource or property as approved by Council. 28. Improvement: any building, structure, fence, gate, landscaping, hardscaping, wall, work of art,or other object constituting a physical feature of real property or any part of such feature. 29. Inappropriate Alteration: alterations to historic resources which violate these provisions and/or the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 30. Integrity, Architectural or Historical: the ability of a property, structure, site, building, improvement or natural feature to convey its identity and authenticity, including but not limited -25- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance\✓` Attachment 4 June 28,2010 to its original location, period(s) of construction, setting, scale, design, materials, detailing, workmanship,human values,uses and association. 31.Inventory of Historic Resources:the list of historically designated resources and properties consisting of Master List and Contributing Properties List Historic Resources, and any properties, objects, sites, gardens, sacred places and resources subsequently added to the inventory as determined to meet criteria outlined herein and approved by the City Council. 32.Listed Resource:properties and resources included in the Inventory of Historic Resources. 33. Massing: the spatial relationships, arrangement and organization of a building's physical bulk or volume. 34.Master List Resource: designation which may be applied to the most unique and important historic properties and resources meeting criteria outlined herein. 35. Minor Alteration. Any structural or exterior change to a historic resource which the Director determines to be consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and other applicable standards. 36. Modern Contributing Resources: designation which may be applied to properties and resources which are less than 50 years old, but which exemplify.or include significant works of architecture or craftsmanship. 37. National Register of Historic Places: the official inventory of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, engineering, archaeology and culture which is maintained by the Secretary of the Interior under the authority of the Historic Sites Act of 1935 and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. 38.Neglect: the lack of maintenance, repair or protection from natural elements or vandalism of a listed property, resource, site or structure, whether intentional or not, which results in significant deterioration, as determined by the Director, CHC or City Council based on visual and physical evidence. 39.Non-Contributing Resource: designation which may be applied to properties and resources in historic districts which ai•e typically less than 50 years old and do not support the prevailing historic character of the district or other listing criteria as outlined herein. 40. Preservation: the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain a historic site, building or other structure's historically significant existing form, integrity, and materials through stabilization,repair and maintenance. 41. Property Owner: the person or entity holding fee title interest or legal custody and control of a property. -26- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 42. Primary Structure: the most important building or other structural feature on a parcel in terms of size,scale,architectural or historical significance,as determined by the Committee. 43. Qualified Professional. an individual meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Pan 61 Appendix A) in history, architectural history, historic architecture and other designated categories, or an individual determined by the CHC to have the qualifications generally equivalent to the above standards based on demonstrated experience. 44. Reconstruction: the act or process of recreating the features, form and detailing of a non- surviving building or portion of building, structure, object, landscape, or site for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. 45. Rehabilitation: the act or process of making possible a compatible.use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its architectural,cultural,or historic values. 46. Relocation: removal of a resource from its original site and its re-establishment at another location in essentially the same form,appearance and architectural detailing. 47. Remodel: Alteration of a structure which retains at least 75 percent of the original building framework, roof and exterior bearing.walls and cladding, in total, and which reuses the original building materials to the maximum extent possible. 48.Responsible party:,any person,business,company or entity,and the parent or legal guardian of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, who has done any act for which an administrative penalty may be imposed. 49. Restoration the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared,'at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. 50.Scale: the proportions of architectural design that relate to human size or other relative size measure. 51. Secretary of the Interior's Standards: the .Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as published by the U.S. Department of the Interior and as amended from time to time. 52..Setting:the physical area,environment or neighborhood in which a resource is located. 53. Sensitive Site: a site determined by the Community Development Director, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission or Council, upon recommendation of the Cultural Heritage Committee, to have special characteristics, constraints or community value such as: historic significance, historic context, creek side location or visual prominence, 27 Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 requiring more detailed development,review than would otherwise be required for other similarly zoned lots. 54. Site: as used in this ordinance, the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural; or archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. In general terms, site also includes the landscape surrounding a building or other structure and contained within an individual parcel or contiguous parcels of land. 55.Siting:the placement of structures and improvements on a property or site. 56. Stabilization: the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weather resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property while maintaining the essential form as it exists at present. 57. Statement of Historic Significance: A statement of significance is an analysis-based argument or explanation of why a resource is important within its historic context. It explains how the resource meets the eligibility criteria and integrity thresholds as established by local, state or federal government. 58. Structure: as used here, "structure" includes anything assembled or constructed on the ground, or attached to anything with a foundation on the ground; including walls, fences, buildings,signs,bridges,monuments,and similar features. 59. Survey: a systematic process for identifying and evaluating a community's resources using established criteria. "Survey" may also refer to the documentation resulting from a survey project. 60. Threatened Resource: properties or resources at risk of loss of architectural, cultural or historic value due to physical alteration, relocation or demolition. 61.Zoning Code:Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code,as amended from time to time. trr G:ICDD DocumentsWistoric Preservation Ordinance and Guidelinesl Working Drafts)Historiepreservationordinance061810CHCDraft(working).docm _28 _ Attachment 5 Ta b 1 e--9fGv Rte nts Lj;st.c I:;G-pTese pvzt;or,-Prog.m M-Guide!;nos .,-w;s to r;r .Pa sss wat.en? .............. .............................................................. -1--w;stode-R-esourzes..........................................................................................2- 2----H.;sto 0 c-Prese-wation-Di striets..........................................................................2 C.—Be.-.-fits-ar�eFv;ces-Offered-bp.l..C;................................................ 4 4.—Pehabilitat,*on-Assist-anee-P,,3gFa ....................................................................4 2—Alte.mative-BOding-6od ................................................................................4� 3—lnspeetlen-SeFviees......................................................................................... . 4—. 6oeal-LardmarV,Progra .................................................................................A 5—. P-res ervat;a n-L-i bra ......................................................................................... . 4 6—P,rese rvat;a ri-Ge L;-,se!;.-,g .......................................................................... ......15 7,--Surmmeitim-eJA/al kin g-T-vu .............................................................................5 8—S pea kers-Burca 61.............................................................................................5 D,P-r-r c;p!e sof-P;stori e-Prese rvati o ..................................................... .............................................................................. ........................................................................ .7 E:";st-.ric-Preser.,atiori-anA,Arci,;tectL-ral-Rev;o- F..............................................9 Apperdisses..................... ......................................................................................—..1-1 Attachment 5 NlsteRs-RreseFvater-Pmgram-6Gice!ires T-Mis-Rage-1 ntent;ena I!y-Left-E lan I< Attachment 5 N lstene-P-reseFvat;en-Pfegram-Guidelines stsAs-PreseP.,zt,En? T-he-Gity-ofi n-6uis-0b;#Spe-began--pith- hc-foundlng-ofthc-Old-N^ ssicn-na-7-7-2--Over t-ho-past-tvre-eeRtudes-the-community-has-gene-through-mar4y-changes:T-hese-changes ears be-appreciated-beeause-rnany-ef-4he-o!der-bus idtng-and-histeote-sites-are-r items today--These'rernindefs-"-e-past=help-dune-the--chaFaete�oftian-LL.Us-Gbisps-0ne has--oRl;r-t"isit the-centFal-business-dlstfic-t-oF-wander-tthrough-suFreunding-msldef�,ia! afeas te4fnaginL�wha4;t-must-have-been like-baek-before-autamebiles-and-televisien. lf�eFdep4e-pFesewe-a-sense-ef-the-eernmuRity's-histery;the-Glty-has-established4hls presewatien-pmgfafr.--The-Gity wants-49-work-with-4ts-citizens-te--premete-4he pfeseFvation-oef-histone-and--arehltectural"repartant-buildings-and-sites--The pFeseFvatlof+-ef-hlstensrbuildings-and-site s-maintains-e u-cem m unity's-herlta^ye-and effeFsrspeelfie,eeaPefnie-beaefits-to-the-ewnens-cf-these-pproperxies: M uueh-ef-the-City's-histeFie-preservation-prograrrr-s-administered-by-a-seven-rnernber eitizen"reup-ealled-the-Gultural-Heritage-Gemm;ttee-(G-', ):T-he-dutie"f4he-GHG-afe feFther-4essFibed4FR the-,Appendi*,\-of^these-guideli„es=T-,.e- ommittee-is-assisted-by staff--in-the-San-L-uis-8blsp"emrnunity-Bevelopr,ent Depart sent: T-o-eentast-the Gemrraittee-er-te-get-r-r3efe-lnforr:atien-,-phorne-car-visit-t-e m;f,unity-2evelepme it Depart:r,ent-at-tarty-Ha[ 49-Palm-Street,-San-6uis-Obispo-Gal.fem;a-934g;-3''�,"05) �-747-9 Rage 1. Attachment 5 Hist£File-Rresewation-Pregraa�-C-u;de!i nes B!":ka't-Ar-,;s:,:es-are-F iate r!sz!! 4mpc:tant-?- �her�are-ttiv®-types-of�istor�s-prapedios-ia-baa-L-u is-0bi spo- Iadiv,d-sal-bui!ding&*,a,t-have-sig, €tsant-histen eF-architestur-a.-val,de"are-called Ml,aster-L-ist-Hicteric-Re urtes" Bu;ldiags-is-olderp-4idghborhoods-that--contribute-to-the-char-atter-�that neighbefheed,are-cafled°eentributiRg'properties: Owners-ef--these-prepeFties-a}ay-be-eFgible4or-benefts-aad-se wises-desedbed-ia-the next-sectiea-Add itienahinferamatiea-about-h isteric-pFepeFties4s-p resented-below. 4—k!lsto r;e-Resc--roes ba498-! a-citkzens-eGmmittee-appointed-by-the-City-Gouneil-sasveyed-the-e!deF buildings-in-town—these-built-befefe '4a4tet;—Ater-studying-the-h steFy--and archit£ctuFe�o�these-builsf lags-the-6ity-Gouneia-ae�sroued-a-listi,Rg-o�preperties that-aFe-considered-H ist£ric-R£sourc-es--Ther£-aFe-five-classes-af-reseufces-.-The definitian-of-each-class-and-the'Faaster-4;S'-of-hist£Fie4esouFces-afe4neiude" Appendix B-ef-these-guidelsnes: Phe-Gity4s-eentiaa ng-te-study-the-histeap-of4ts-eldeF-neighbeFhseds sse--more histeFis-sites-ma"e-added-te-the-llst-Ghecic-W-.th-the-Gommunity-Bevelepraent Depa#neat-for- e-nest-�ate-4isting-Also-property--awnem-may-eendust their-e n-research-aad-ask-the-Gity-Godaeik4o-add4heir-prepeAy4e4he4ist-Mere e WeFr i"en-about-this-procedure-is-included-ir-Appendix-G 2—H3st-odr-P-Fesenaat!eF-Distriets In '.--a87,-t„e-G#y-G unc- r.eated-thFee-Histerie-Rresefvatien-Gistnstts-T-he pufpese-"e-distgets4s-toAentif"r lder-paFtsef-Ban-6uis-0bispc-that-exhibit-aa ifnpeftant-paft-ef-our-eorafnunitir's-histo-we-distO t.r;ia;e-siF`se-been-added: Rhllread-and-Ghinatewn-4he-distOc-ts-a Fe-shown-en-Fig uFs--#1-and4netude-the dewntewa-businessAistriet-and-parts-ef-the-older-reside ntibl-neig hborheods-that suFmund-it. Buit6iisg&,Mthin-each-distFicct have43een-classifed-as=cergtFibuting-°potentially centFibe:Wag"-ef-=aen-corMbuting'EentFibuti-Fig-buildings-add-4e the-hist£Fie characteF-ef-the-neighbofhood-RoteatiaHy-contribu�,ing-are prepeFEes-which-rnay faeet-the-Gflteria-fof lRlstoAc--Reseere£ Designation-bo t-tither have-not-yet-been evaluated-foF45tin"F-mquire- estsFati*en-bGfore-final-designation-arid-l;st;ng. Oven-eaatAbutinoui!dings-are-typically-aeweF-stfuctuFes-that-d"ot-suppoA4he pFevailung-histeFie-chafaete�e-area:. T4ie-boaada6es-ef-historicAistriets-ean-ehange-eveF tune G-GhecNrwith-the GeFnn ity-9evelopFneFrf9epaftment-far-the-mest-up-te-date--zap-Citizens-m-ay aslFthe-Q4-6eansikte-sreate-new-histerie4ist, cts-er-ehange4,e-bound,Fies-cif exist!fig-on boL,.t-this r-ocedure;s-included-in-Appehdix-i=- Rage- s��5 � �b ��♦gyp,.. �III� r���,� 1111►. '� O� p� � �a '� 111= = . •....y � I ♦ V �• ,``,``, �♦`� `�,� \ta��,.�,♦:��\O` aOp�j���♦ ii�``p���i����,0 ♦� . �`��O`,,�J II�;1�:.� ll -♦.♦ENV 4� �'��� �, �. .•moi. `, `���.. �♦♦O♦ � � � � ♦mow, �♦���`�•���•,�'� ,"•.,�I�� PAP MAN PIP NO, all Mm O� ♦♦ ���•�ti ��� •� �i�• i i♦moi '�''•♦ = G �, •OI O� ' �♦� ��i�,��`♦�'�`\� �Q� Q��`��i,����� � ��� � 5 r! ��:: _� ►i�%r�, it �1�� ,� ���� ""-111L' L'IIII 91111 IIID 111111 .'dllll.!■: \== -u � �•"'•.,... ��♦♦I/��%�,�� _ON I _ =111 n _ lr= \ =. �> '����iTi ♦♦♦ �Qp ♦♦ �O,♦ „ . II II11JI111111111111111�IIIIIIIIrIIIII11111L!I\� ;j_ � __.__ -_gyp♦ �i �.♦ D O� ♦, '-�� ■ ■ ' unu nvYi � Y?'Y-'rn rev ' - � ,111111=_fir.-:,♦.....�'�+�,,�.�. r '���w: Yrn.Yl.lB p1f. ■= ��II�_ i�� , \ Ii 1- �• �♦mm�r rgrrmmp� ♦) m= = A�� 0 li,....�.►�G►♦i .► _111111111 � 0+,���� �' �� �► �: 111111 IIIIIIIIillllllllli/r♦�- i !!� !111111111:X1111■1.;_1111 IGS' . 1 Mill Street ■■ llllllllf n111111Ti-��l�ll�i `lecieno ju..2 Chinatownr O 11�1111111111111111111111111111111111�♦�;���m�,r 3 Downtown 4 Old Town �)larannnnunnnnnr - t � ♦ pRailroad Historic Preservation Districts k s Attachment 5 H istsfis-Preservation-Rregram-C-uidelines C�-Bs re€:ts-zr d-SePAses-Offs.red-lb;-the—Chy Sar-Luis-Gao-spe-depe,,qds-on-the-i nterest-and-vol u nta ry-aetiens-obits-sitiZens-tea k-0- this-histeric-prre,}sye�rvvation-progr�a�vsrk. Te-encourage-pae#ic>patian-the-cty-offers-the fol!e1 ing-pregfofnJ Und-selpv;ccs-. 4—Rehtiabsli to tle"ssistarce-Prey ram Fhe-city-has-c-coated-a 4inancial-assistance-pregrarn4o-•heip"r,eperty-owners-witb the-eest-ef restoang-histerie-residential-buildl;ngs-Details-ef-this-program--who4s eligible, tens-ofassistance-appiicatien-precedures---ar-o4noluded-in-Appendix ter: 2—A l to rnative-B u l 1 d 1 r g-C a d e Ar4yene-w-ho-arvaats4o-rned6a-histoOG-build,'rsg•rnay-use-provissi®ns-of 4he-city's Histere-Buildin g-Ged&A hick-allrntietiag-standard-csde requirements.-The-histo is sodoir:ight-mAe-it•casier-to-restore-o?d-buildings-that wen,-constmeted-long-before- an-"uis-Obispo-adopted-building-regulatiens-Fef details-about-hov,f--previsions-Gf-t,he-historic-code-might-apply4"out-pso;ect, oentaefthe-Bmiiding-Divisier in-the-Commur:ity-0evelepment-0epattrnent-a48G5j 71 7480-6opies-eft-hc-code-ca"e-,pu.-ehased-fmm-the-dopardfrant: 3-1rspection-SeMces 4fyed-ewn-a-historic-building-and-want-to-know-s•,that-it-w uld4ake-to-irnprove4t— to-bfiag-it-up-te-code---the-city- n-help--Tho-Building-Divisiorrwill inspeefyear buiidding-#fee-of-eharge-and-will--identify-ma er-imprevements-needed-to-meet code- Owners-o"jsWo-Resources-san-ask-the-city-for-offieia+-reoognib e"f-their effsrts te--preserve4mpe, ant-stfustures7-The-city-M11-provide-a-corEifcate-suitable for-ffaming-afld—if-clesired-by-tbe--owrer;a--permanent-h;storic-mar-ko"o-be installed-er -the-bend ng-site—Fo�more-iafsrmaticn--son act-thy Ce r r^,u:3ity Devel e p r g a n4-D e p a Ft rn art: 5—PresAnati e:a-L�9h:sa� The-c4ty-is-cfeating-a4ibrary infom-ation-thafcan-help-people-.,vith-restoration pro;ects-of-witliAist®rie-research—The-libraF�contains-infoFinatierr-abouthisteris resouroe-properties-and-pre perties-in-hi sterir-distriets-lt4 nc-!odes-serve-old-craps efthe-eky-acrd-buildlfig-per-crit-meards-sae"fne,-publisatiens4hat-Mil-bedded to4he-4ibrafy4ndude: o 'row-fe-do4t-beeksert-msteratier m Gatalegs-efavallable-building-rraterials,and-architestural-accessories Rage-4 pI-ES- �F� Attachment 5 Historic Preservation Program Guidelines o Period;,cabs-sr-ether•--publieatier-es-thatdeseqbe-preservatio,etferts = A-feferFaHist-ef-people-who-have-undertaken restaration-pre ec s-aed-aw willing-te-shareA-heir-ex-perieRce Tt�e-presesva#iea-I ibra;-y-'ss-lsEa+ed-in-the-Goer,m unity-Dene ie pmen*,Dcpartmert era-t+�s-ssrresF s€ Palrxi-aid-lrSse at g?9 �a1>rw Street-Tho-depanmentas-open-8 is-67-Pal Gnday-thrs ugh-FF day: 6—. Presewatisn-Sosonseling The-GeltuFal-Heatage-GGFnmittee--wiil-meet ivith--pesp!o-vvho-want-te-pursue preser-vatle"Fe;eets-The-H"an-prsvide-advise-on: a Hev-te-rostare-e!def-buildings#-econstFuc-tion-teehalqueo = Hos v-t®,get-igformatjKm-about--building-materials; c HGv. te-eaF e'er' StBrtG FefieaFc-.h, Hoav to-take-advantage-ef available-state r-federal-gr=ant-programs-Orta- relief-programs; Hew-to-prepare-a-NationakRegis,or-appllsatior�eme-ti-,r:tern-r,€proration. about-the-Plat,onakRegistef-4s--irne?uded-in-Append ix-G izeople✓interested-4R4alking-AMt"e-cemrnittee-shsul"entaet-tire-Gorr munity Deve!apment-B"aMT- nt: The-Gultwai-kleritage--Se ittee-also�revides-tkae-folievving-edueationaL services available-te-alt-ettizens, 6,�6-�erabers-eend�ret-torr +steric-seetra!-busirsess-distF;eEaRa-elldeF residential-areas-thy eughGut-the-sufnfnes.--For-more-infem atisn-about-the-touF sehed-ale-sentaet he-Gesaffvdnity-9evelopment-Department: GHG-members-are-avallabie•-to make-presentations-e—comrrLnity-groups interested-:a-his�eFis Fesmation—Groups--can---arrange-4or--a---srpeaker-by c-entaeting-the-Ger-ririaunity-De�oeleprrert-Dep+artfno�^ gat-i� hr-so-c^^+ceics--befeFe the-proposed-speaking-date. Rage-b Pis - 6 5 ` Attachment 5 ";st,edc-P,�escrvater- P-mgram--GuidellIes T-he-preser-vatiere-of-historio-ba!!dsrgs-most-o€ten-depends-on-th2 vole=,a y-actions o€ individua!s-Nevaever both-individua',s,and-the-co^�mtnity-aflame-havc-a-ste!co-ia rnWide actions-that-change-histerio-proporties: 4•:-Glhastr ins g-th�E-xter-i o"f-H;s to r;G-8 u i!ding s Changes-te-;#�2--Outside-oda-hstor•;maildirsg-sha�i!d-f�#i3er-promo*•e-its-original architeetura!-style-and-eha racter- A-banding-may-re#!eet-a-c-ore binatien-of-•stiles-or-aright-have-ween-rnodi€ied-or.e or-more4mes-4n-the-past-Ghanges-to4he-outside-of-such-a-ba;ding-should-not introdtce�ea3e nev✓ or-sonflicttng e;ement and should cop!emont tha pxvailiFg architects+re-ef-tbe-sa FFounding-area-Changes-te-parts-of-a-woi!ding-that-hhave bees�sedified-in-the--past shoal.d-usual4y--e-x-hibit-4he-building's--Original arehitectara4-style- 2,-N ev*�Gor:stm-ction-Pr-e;ests T-hc-design--of-nebv-aecessept-straetupW-sac!h-,as-storage-sheds-os-garages-}or -minor-structural-addtions-should-camploment-the-style-ef-the-histeric-build.,ng- Nevs--�r-�mouse--of-e-xteNer-bailding-materials-€ereign-to-the-histo Re stnietare-should-generai!y-we-ave!ded- Now-priraafy-stfuetdres-within-the-'#istoric-Preservation-®istriets-•should-fur#hef pros;ate-t,he-histene-chaFacte€-of-those-areas-Care€uk3 tenfien4"uilding-ferai7 buh;sca4�g-and-site4a tdscaping-is-eneouraged-Ai4-new-buildings-need net-we-designed-iia-the-same-*Ie-of-sunFounding-st-ructures-4owever,elements ekhese-styles-and-baildi ng-ferrets-should-be4nck:ded-in4he-nmv-structure-and-it should-compleme-Fvt-the-arohrtect�rakhafactor"ef4he-area- T-he US—DepaAment-o Interior-h a"ublishe"tandards-for-H;,ster-is Preservation-aleng-wit#► ujdelines-far-applying-them-neoplo-who-are-restoring older..buildings—m—nay-wis#ke-review-these-guidel Ines-Copies-can-be-ebta ined-at the-Gemrnuni4--DevcloprT•ent-Department--or-oa!in�ss�tevRoea�- !ays/a rcl�-studs-f�:kttre �s-SesretarSr-c��-the-!este rior's-Standarc.'s-€or-ttsa�,rezt�os�L-c€-kr istori o Qroperfles T-he-Standards-pertain-4o-histe0ce bu!Idings-o€-all mateK;als constfuct!on-types; sizLs d-eec-upaney-and-encompas&4he-exAener-an44he-4nterior-of-histene buildings.-T-he-Sta,Adards-also-encompass-related-landscape-featr:res-an"e building's-site-and-envireRment as-well-as-attached;-adjacent-er-related-new eenstruotiert .Page-6 _ S Attachment 5 H i steac-PTcsenration-a-mgra m-Gu id c!i^es T-he-S4asderd&em4o-be app;!ed-taspeei€c-mhab!!iCation-projeets-!n-a-reasonGb!e manner taking-into-consideratien-eeonem!c-and-teehn!c-al-feas!b!!!ty -I.- \-prope"a"e-used fer-its-h!stericpurpose-e;be-placed in-a-ne,.r-use that-requires-- inimakchange-to-tbe-def!n!^g-chasactedst!cs-of-the-bui!d!ng and4t-s-site-a^d-environment: -2. T-1, - stefic--ehafacter--of-a-pfopeFty-shat-be-retained-and-presefvcd-T-he Fere*vat-�isteRr-seate rials-or-al,teraxioa-o#--features-a nd-spaces-that ehaFaete4ze-a-pFGpe all-be-aveided- 3-Each-preper#p shalMae-recogni-zed-aas-"t-,ysical-recerd-o€4ts-time;place, and use-Ghanges-that-create-a-false-sense-ef-histeric-develepment-such-as adding-conjeetural-features-or-arch!teeturakelements-frons--other-b-uildings; shall-nst-be-uflde rtaken: 4-Mest-properties-ehang"vekifne=t-hese-ehanges-that-have-acquired-histeFie signi€eanee4n4heir-ewn-Fig ht-shall-be-Feta in ed-and-presewed- 5. ;st r;ettve4eatuFo&4.,gishes and-eonstructi*n-techniques-or-examip!es-o# er;aftFnenship-that-ehaFae enze-a-prepe% sha!l-b"res'rved. &. -BeterioFated-hist*Fic-features-sha,'l-bampaired-rather-thai-replaced.-Mefe the-se.eftty-G"eteReratton-mquiFes-replacem,,eRt•-of•--',istinctive-featun:-the ne%%featuee-shall-rxfatch-the-old-i a-desrgft-ce!er,-textuFe,and-ethepMsual qualities-and-w#heFe-possible m-rra'tes als-Replacersent-of-m- issingfeatures shall-be-substantiated-by-desurnentary-"c-ako"ictoral-ev!de,gce 7-.-Ghem,;eat-oF- ysical4reatfrents;such-as sandblasting;ttiat-cause-damageAe histefie-matefia[s-shall-net-be-used.-4he-surface-e!eaning-of-structures;t# app-spOate,-shaWbe-underta kc-"ting 4h.e•geht!est-rheai;s-possible: 8-SigA,;fleant-areheelogiea!-ms*ur-ees-a#este"y-a-pmject-shall-be-proteeted and-prese ed.--sash-resouFces-Bust-t3 istur:bed;4rAigatien-FFseasures sha"e-undertakenr 9-New-additions ex#eri*r additien&,-c F4elated-new-construction-shall-not destrey-I-iisteiie-mateOols-that-c-haract*azo-the-p,r,opertN-. - e-neN4-jork-shall be dgc-ent!ated m-the-ofd-and-sha!!-be-oenpatib!cwuith-the-massing-size scale and-a mlikeeturat-features-t"retcet-the-historic-integrity-of-tho-property and4ts-opvimPment- 4-0-A!ew addit;ens-and-adjacent-er-related-near-constfuctian-shat!-be undertaken in-such-a-man,serfhat-if-removed-in-the-future-the-essential-€or,m-and-integrity "e-histGA"FopeF"d-its-envi,vGR rent-weuldbe-unimpaired- 3-QeFre!ishing-u sEer-lcJ3u!!d;nes T-he-Sity-profsaetes-the-long-terra-Fria intenanee-and-restoration-of-designated Histo4G4Reseurses-and-bulldings4-f-histefic-D;strietsr-T,he-Gity--wants-to-ws.,-wwith propert"wner-s--to-exp!ere-alternatives-te-demelitierr,such-as-rehabilitation-and adaptive-reuseekhe43uilding;use- f-the-a!tef-ative-building-cede's-prGv;sions-te fnalce-Fehat�ilitati®p-nsere-feasible;er-possib!e-Fe!ecaticn--ef-the-strt:cturc�-ie-a mm-suitable-site: Page4 ,., Attachment 5 l� stoFic P-.T'YPFva-lliGn-p��Y�grar -G iide1;pzs The-derrs:;tier-ef-a-klistE)Or PResoarce4s-4he4east-favored-ep,ien-and-should-be dere-enlyvhe►r-(l�-the-conditier�-of-the-building-poses-a-th rest-to-the-hea!th; safe"F—weFfare-e€-eernmunity--residents-or-people-luring-er-wle•ki".g-ora-ar-near• the-site er-q)-the-prejeet-spensor-deme^strates-tha-t-is-it-financia!?y4nfeasible-to ret;abi litate4he-street,ure-or-preserve-the-h isteric-naWm-o€-the-s!tc. Fer-infer-matien-abeut-th"ity's-develcpment-and-demolition-pe=ni it-processes; centaet-tbe-Building-Bpiv;sier-t-atOO5N-87-z489.-The-st t#-Gan-explain-ho,Ai-these pemiit-proeedures-appiy-•t"stefio-building Rage-8 Attachment 5 Histo ric-Preser-vaRisn-�-eg raga-Guideii nes 'E—. R:.cit'eiftt -Pese�i LSv .Q'}i"•YLK.�J' :�v vS�::i�.�s����r�i�:�i� Preposals-to--censtruct-or-mGdi'y-cerrmercial-buildings-condaminiums-or apartr eats are-subjes to :he-oiV!S- rehitectaral-review-p;ecess—Now-Buildings-and-major modifica:ioRs-te-ex;sting-buildings-ace-reviewed-by-khe-Architectural-R-eviex-Go mm i ttee (AR-S"iner-oF-incidentakmedifc-at en&Ao-existing-buildings-are-ro3^ally-reviewed-bye the-Gomrnu Rky-8evelopFnent-D;reetor: T-he-C44,!s arehitec-t-ural-reuiov4-process�ay-also-apply-to-Wrepesal-to-change-a-histeris builde'R"F4e-eoRstwct-a-ne�,�-building-in-a-kisteric-P-reservc;tion-FDistriet. `AlheR-tbe-RING er-the-B iceetor-are-revievAng-censtructiGn-prefects-or-proposals-te-demelish-histerie buildings hey-Fnay-ask-fer�dvice-froRi the-GaltmFal-Heritage-C—omFrittee. Guidelines-that--deseribe-Akre-arch itectural-review-process-are-available-from-the Gomm.unity-BevelepmeRt-Depa#rneRt—Fer-mem--nferr•Rati.on-abett-vrhat-might--be required;contaet-the-departFrent. Pages Attachment 5 !=;isters-P-reservat;en-Pmgram-guide!^es T-h;s-Page4ntent;enaly-6eft-E;ergk Attachment 5 Historical Preservation Program Guidelines: Appendices Appendices �4-6et}-C�Lr:si!-t�esEleslioe�-estxbl:sl;crtey-tl;�le-,:��utles-e#-ttar-C::!t�rzl B--U*st-o`properties-era-ti,e4.:lxstar-L4st-cf-Histarimi-4esaurces G—Rrese�ures-for-x��E.sg-�sc�efties-to-lk:e-Mister-l=isS-e��?isterie-Resc�•rces 9-6entAbuting-Riopwfies-ust E:--P-rec�-.dures4or-,afnending-or•estabI.s'h Rg-H'istcrlEa!-P,-SrrV.ltiera-D3ssrists F—Z-an i ng-P.egulations-fair-H;st-or-:sal-P-resemtien-D-strio!s G—!nf,onnatiera-about-tine-National-Reg ister-of-historic-Piares H—l�es<rlution--�e-6-f 53—ae'oMi:ag the---►.�tisluricxi-�Presen•3tie.^.—!�reyra::t Guidelines Page-44 APPENDIX A RESOLUTION NO. 6155,(1987 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISP DEFINING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION GOALS AND ESTABLISHIN THE CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE AS A CONTINUING SPECIAL RPOSE ADVISORY BODY. WHEREAS, The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) was created in 1981 a temporary committee to complete an inventory of community historical resources and versee the development of a Historical Preservation Program; and WHEREAS, the CHC completed an initial inventory of the com nity's historical, architectural and cultural resources in 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted resolution 5197 (19 3 series) that establishes an official listing of historical resources; and WHEREAS, the CHC, Planning Commission, Arc tectural Review Commission, City Council, city staff and the public have evaluated numero s alternatives for establishing a I Historical Preservation Program; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 1986 the Ci Council adopted Resolution 6097 which established preservation program gui ines and directed staff to prepare ordinances and other materials needed to establis a preservation program; and WHEREAS, it is appropriat to establish the CHC as a. continuing special purpose advisory body to help adm' ister the program; and WHEREAS, it is app opriate to set forth the goals of the city's historical preservation progra NOW THERE ORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: cc io Intent of Historical Preservation. It is in the public interest to prote and preserve historical, architectural, and cultural resources including mo ments, sites, objects, structures, buildings and other designated areas. 2: Historical Preservation Goals. The city's Historical Preservation rogram should: R 6159 APPENDIX A Attachment 5 Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series) Page 2 A. Foster civic and neighborhood pride and a sense of identity based on the recognition and use of Historical Resources; B. Promote the enjoyment and use of Historical Resources appropriate for the education and recreation of the people of the city; C. Encourage public knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the city' past; D. Safeguard the heritage of the city by providing for the preservation f Historical Resources which represent significant elements of its history. E. Protect property values and increase economic and financial b nefits to the city and its inhabitants; F. Protect and enhance the city's attractions to residents a✓ visitors; G. Encourage architectural styles within Historical Preservation Districts which reflect established architectural traditions. H. Conserve valuable materials and energy resourc by continuing to use and maintain existing buildings. Section 3: 1 The CHC is hereby established as a continuing special purpose7;_ 7 . A. Membership. The CHC members. The members of the CHC shall include a person knowledgeable in , a person with training or experience in structural rehabilitation, awith knowledge of architecture (a minimum of three people). The membership shall incle city resident from each of the three Historical Preservation Districts creaOrdinance No. 1086 (1987 Series). At least eight/shI be residents of the City of San Luis Obispo. B. Terms. Thmittee members shall be two years. Terms of five original meme on March 31, 1988, and terms of six original members shall expire o89. Terms shall expire thereafter on March 31st at two-year inteC. Fun i CHC will: (1/Hist nsolidate and make available information about Historical Resources al Resource Sites and promote, participate in, orsponsor education and inrograms. (2vice and guidance for the restoration, alteration, decoration, laf maintenance of Historical Resources or properties within Historical P enervation Districts. APPEND X Resolution No. 6157 (1987 Series) Page 3 (3) Review the Inventory of Historical Resources and recommend to the City Council any amendments. (4) Assist property owners with the preparation of National Register applications f for Historical Resource Sites. (5) Help to administer benefit programs approved by the City Council that ar directed at preserving Historical Resources or resources within Historical Preservation Districts. (6) Publish and maintain Historical Preservation Program Guidelines ich present (a) benefit programs sponsored by the city; (b) procedures for adding pr erties to the Inventory of Historical Resources or for establishing a Historical D' trict; and (c) other information concerning historical preserva/pursuit (7) Review actions proposed by public agencies andtion on how such actions may affect designated or eligible propertiesent to Historical Districts. (8) Cooperate with local, state, and federal agenciesf historical preservation. (9) Function within the guidelines and policies ofties Handbook and perform other duties as assigned by the City Counc`1I. Section 4: Definitions. The following words and phrases shall have the following meaning: (1) Historical Preservation District. A /area which has been so designated under Chapter 17.54 (Zoning Regulations). (2) Historical.Resource or Historical Resource Site. Any improvements, buildings, sites, areas or objects of scientific,aesthetic, educational, cultural, architectural or historical sign* Cance that have been designated by resolution of the Council and included in the Inventory of Historical Resources. Historical Resources or Historical Resource Sites are classified as follows: Priority #1: Alread placed on the National Register. Priority #2: Dete fined eligible for the National Register. Priority #3: Eli ble for the National Register. Priority #4: P9fentially eligible for the National Register. Priority #5: of eligible for the National Register but significant at a local level. (3) Invento of Historical Resources. All properties listed by address in the Completio Report (approved by City Council Resolution No. 5197, 1983 Series) and any other properties subsequently added to this listing by resolution of the City Council/ Secti�5: Resolution No. 4660 (1981 Series), that established the temporary Cul l Heritage Committee, is hereby rescinded. APPENDIX _ Attachment 5 Resolution No. 615 (1987 Series) Page 4 On motion of Councilwoman Dovey.. .. ,;.seconded by Councilman Sett-le, and on the following role call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Dovey, Settle and Mayor Pro-Tem Griffin NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Dunin the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 3rd day of ruar , 1987. Mayor Pro-WIA Robert y< ffin ATTEST: 1 'Ci y Clerk Pamela es APPROVED: e-- . City Administrative Officer /�� City Atto ey IV T /�sG42Gtr/twf:�'" Community DeveYopment Director Attachment 5 Appendix A RESOLUTION NO.6 5 9 3 (1989 Series) AN RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6157 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE (CHC) AND RESOLUTION NO. 6253 WHICH ADOPTED CHC BYLAWS WHEREAS, in October .1988 the City Council amended the Advisory Body Handbook and . requested that all city commissions and committees submit amendments to pertinent ordinances or bylaws needed to achieve consistency with the new handbook, and WHEREAS, on February 2, 1989, the Cultural Heritage Committee reviewed its bylaws and resolution that created it, and forwarded recommendations to the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council off theCity of San Luis Obispo as follows: / SECTION 1. Amendments to Resolution # 6157, as shown on attached Exhibit "A" incorporated herein by reference, are hereby approved. SECTION 2. Amendments to Resolution #6253 (CHC bylaws), as shown on attached Exhibit "B" incorporated herein by reference are hereby approved. On motion of -Vice—Mayor Pinard, seconded by Councilmember Rappa, and the following role call vote: AYES: Councilmembrs Pinard, Rappa and Mayor Dunin i NOES: None / ABSENT: CounciAmembers Reiss and Settle the foregoing resolution as passed and adopted this 2 day of March 1989. Mayor Ron Dunin TEST: ty Clerk P ogee 6593 Attac ent 5 Appendix A Resolution No. 6591989 Series) Page 2 APPROVED: cry Cit Administrativie Officer City At ney Community Development Dir ctor Attachment 5 HistorieaWresmatiGPa RMgMM-6aideline"p endix-B B—Ust-of-r eeseFfies-Gri-the-Master-L:st-c+-". sttOAGaI-..e50s ate ril4000ks Address !4Esters-NZMe Zone DistricA SerlZMG. 445-=E-ANDREWS ANDIRS &ADOSE R-1-S 0004-O,3R 694ENT-044VAX j. j. UNNE HOUS€ E-1 0-165-05R 448-BR-GAD BRAZ4L-N2tSE i-1• 0002-04R 962BROA{-D MANDERSGHSQ-H91d4SE= R-3-H E3owntewn 0008-04R -I 4€rBR,9Al3 AN-DE-RWN-HO 9-H 9!d-T-Go 0004 G4-R 4414-BROAD MASER-1 E9USE= R-2-H Old-T-own 0005--0048 4426-BROAD DUTTO"t -GUS€ R-� Otd TGwn 0005-04R 4436-BROAD N466SR-HIGUSS R-2-H OldTeswn 0007-04R 4445-5R-OAD FANK-€NST-EN-HOUSi= R-2-H 9ld-T<hwra 000&44R 4lr04SROAD V-&TTSR,6N€-HIGUSS R-2-H O-0d-4=s;^,- 0009-03R 464.0-SR-OAD "sGKE-NINON QUS€ R-2-H ()Id-TGWR 0040-04R 4546-S,R43AD R-€ME� ,HODS€ R-2-H OldTGtxn 0044-041 4639-BROAD TkJQKE-R-HGWSE R-2-# O;dTvom 0042-04R 74 -BA4GHON R,WRON-AN6€I-ROb4S€ R-2-H Old-Te.sfl 0043-Wv 746416LGHGN dESSbE-WMGuJ-MATER `SHO^4E R-2-H OldTewfl 0044048 74343UGHON BPADB-URY-SAN4TAR4U A R-2-H OldTG14vn 0046-04R 74,54UGHON SRADBUR-Y-HOUS€ R-2-H OldTewo 0946-04R SON KAISER-NOUS€ R-2-H Old-T-o wn 0817-94R 762 WGHON STANT-G"-GUS€ R-2-H OEdTGvtn 0048-04R 74GH-GN BREW-HOU-SE- R-2-H QkkTezwn 094.9-04R 774 Q� B 4G40N UP-HAM44OUSE R- LH OWTelm 0020-04R 7854VJG�" MARS4IALL-HOUSE 2H GkiTBwn 0024-o4R 7-93-BUGHON GROCa(ER-HOUSE R-24H Old-Twin 90-22-03R 794-8-UGHON FTZGE-RA-D-MOUSE R-2-H OEd 4-ewn 0023403R 85043,6 HON G6AR4QNQRTON-HOU-SE R 2 H GkT� 002494R 860-RUGH40N I=EOI-JRIKA"OUSE R-2-E4 OEdTewn 0026-04R 8904aUGHON RAULSON-HOUSE R-2,H Gld-Town 0026-04R 896436GHON GROSSSET7 i-;OUSE R-2-H OldTown 0027-048 4350-SA61FOORA?A &L-49-HIGH-SGHG06-G-YMNASIAJ.M P-r 04-55--05G 868-G-HOR-RO MANSIL4=NRR-SETASS-ADORE R-4 0028-03R 864-G-HORRO SAUERhAD PAS-ADOSE G-D-H Ghinatewd 0029-03R 4026-GHORRQ WADE BUl6DEN6 G4D-H oe watewR 0490-05G 40202 GHORRO DUGH-BUIL-DING G--D-H Dowaatown 04G"6G 4033-GH,GR-R4D W GKE DEN-E UIWING G-D-H Downtown 9402 05G 4396-GHADR -0 REGAN-HIOUSE O 0930-05€t 448-G44ORR-0 MAZZk+iGUSr-- a 0034-04R 4548-GHORR-O BRQOKS-HOUSE R-2-H Old-Town 9032--G3R 4646-GIsEORR-0 FLE14GER44OUSE P,2-H OldTewn 0933-04R 4746-GHORRO ASTON-HOUSE R-2 0084-05R Page-48 ?4A �_ � Attachment 5 H,astorisal-PTcserv,Von-?Tog,,am-6uidell^es Apppendix-3 Addfess H ster:c-Name Zone Distract 4-902-GI4ORRO BIT-IGK-RESIDE-NIGI= R--2 04-70-05R 4-907 GGR-R-O RIAI EY-HOUSE R-2 GG,35-05R 4953-CH RRO OLI•u€R44OUS-E R-2 G4-6--3-05R 466-DANtA RO.SA-BJI-T-RON-A[?OSE- R-3,H Downtown 0036- 3R 5332-DANA A IDERSOINL-HGUSE R-3-M Downtown 003.7-04R 550-DANA BARA'E-BE-RG-HOUSE O-H FID Downtown 0033-04R 444.9-GARDEN 6WO"AR-9114 RE-ML-DING G-D-ki Downtown G4—G3-04G 4423-GARDEN SM PP BUL-D,4NG G-D-H Downtown 0404-05G 4428-GARDEN 641RD-BU46DING G-D-H Downtown 0405-05G 4430-GARDEN STTG`EB-646DING G-D-H Downtown G4-06-05G 4242-GARDEN G06BT Z-EWGGAF RE -HG-JSE G-D Downtown 0839-04G 4405-GEORGE E^D A R -:RU-S1INEL6*KWBE R-2 0454-05R 243.2-HARR-!S WAIL-L-HOUSE R-2 0040-04R 50-HIGUERA DA�L-OF-HIGHWA-Y,S-D1S-�5-OE� RF 04.66-G3G 7-5-HIGUERoA LOOMIS-REED-G0-1AAREHOUSE. G-s4vlu 0407-05G 236-HIG E-RA �. `„^.,^JT-&R6AN,!NG-MILL- G-SIM-U 0408-05G 57-0-F4*UE-RA G06DEN-STATE-GREAMOW G-D Downtown 04G9-05G 7"IGUEP.A GREENRE---L-D-BUILDING G-D-H Downtown 044"5G 726 H 16UERA K6WVER-G G AR-FAGTAPa! G-B-H DowntowiR G444-03G 7-36+flGUEPA GARPJSA-EIdI69IN1,G G-D-H Downtown 04� 740441GUEFbA VOLLMER-GROGE-PPY G D H Downtown 044-3-05G 7677-HIGIJEPA BANK-OF A,41b MG1 --EKING G-D-H Downtown 04-14-03G 7-7-7HIGUE-RA DAN-BUILDING G-D-H Downtown 0445-03G -796-HI,G)J -RA dOHNSON-BDILDING G-014 Downtown G4466-05G �34-k SRA GGMMERQ 6-BAN?4&W4L-DING G-D-H DowntowR 04.1. 5 842F44GUERA WARBENFf-MCRBU16DING G-D-H Downtown 0445-04G 84944x.. d! G060TREE BLOGIE/! QTE=`.":;N MAN-G-D-H Downtown 011-9-050 852-HIGN€PA A-F RPZ-GE4VIQ M-=DING G-D-H Downtown 04,9"5G 855-HIGdE,RA SAN DE,D<G06KJP €-P. BU4LDING G-D-H Downtown 01.2"5G 3897- 6ONrm'BGN.ET_T4- .V,4GH M-&P 0457-04P 44-004R4SS SOUTHERN-PAGIRG-AlA-TER-T-O�AIER GIGS Pailread 0-453-044G 461-ISLAM E-RIGKSON-HQU4 % R-2 0044-04Fi 4634S6AX FTJMIGAU4—HOUSE R-2 0042-05R 4974S4=^m VOLLMER-RGUSS R-2 0043-05R 6354SL-AY SANPE-P.-GGG H.QUSS P,2 H Old-Town 0044-040 594-ISL-/\--Y SANDERG9GK-HOl4SE R-2-H Old-T-own 0045-0518 6444SLAY DANAFPARSOAIS44QUSS R-2•H Old-Town 0046-05R 6704S4=A* F-TZPATR4Gl4-HGLJS4= R-2-H Old-Town 0047-04R 6874S64X ERGK,SON-HO4dSE Pr-2-H, Old-Tewn 0048-03R 689 Is6A R'MQ^ GUSE R-2-H Old Tevrn 0049-04R 7-904SLAY- 4AG14SQM-HOUSE R-2-H Old-Town 0050-04R 77:7 jOHNSON '.,' GKtH-r",ODSE R-2-H M314-Street 0054-05R 4720 d9HNSONl T 4&J6 GE-!S•-k!OUSE R-2 0052-03R 20 "QHNSGN eLD SLBk'S GLASSI 9GM R4 0099-051k 4690 UZZIE 6A-LOMA-DS4 1-NOPAL-EPkADO?E RA-SP 0458-040 400-MADONNA MADOId4VA4NN G-T-,GG---T-S 04224-04G 4500-ETO SOLOMON-ROR€M-AN-HOUSE R4-RD 0466-05R Rage-3-9 Attachment 5 HJs*�rsa,--P;rsserra�iEr�-Pfo�-ern-O�is'elirres:--l���cn�rx 8 Mdress h4s!cr-;C-M-2m.e Zone District yeriaLme: 536-P.4ARSH JACK-HQUSE G B 0054-G30 547-MAR-SH KA,E-TZEL-HI011SSE O-0 0055-94R T7.4-MARSH SNYDE-4,8UIL•XNG G-D4=1 Downtown 94-2-2-040 559-MARSH MAaONLIG-T-0.^,RL-E E-D 94-23-03E 593-1MAR-SH 6LS-POST-GF-F6GE 6-D 04-24-050 954-MARSH F4RST-PRESSEYT•ERJAN-GHUR4aK G-0 M"3G 984-MAR-SH FR•E0,E-RIGK-nAR-T-4 ;LOING G D G4-25-93G 4447-MARSH E-SQIdAR-141OUSE O 0055-04R 442-9-11AARSH RAMAGE-HOUSE O 0057-04R 4445-MARSH SHPM-AN44C USE 0 0058--04R 4441-MAR-SH T-HE. -NURSE-S-!MOUSE O OG59-04R 4445-MARSH FAULI4NEP-,';0 SE O 0060-04R 4460 HARSH STWE4R!S- NITARIUM 0 9426-03G 44-6.7-PhAPZH GRAVSS-HOUSE O 0054-OvR 4305-MARSH REM-HOUSE O OO6M5R 4266-MILL SHIPSEY-HOUSE R 2-HNl R4s!!••Etreet 9063-04R 4-306 MIL'=LL SMJTF!-N.OJSE R-2-H {girl-Street 0064-94R 4323-MIL-L TFE-LAIRD-HOUSE R-2-ki M4-Street 9472-95R 433"A L-L M 60-HOUSS R-2-H MU-Street 006"BR 4424-W,66 MWAJO-HQUSE R-2 0066-95R 4460-M461= MUGL-ER-HO64SE R-2 0067--94R 642-WNTERE-Y HAY-Sr'a^.T!"".E,R-ADOSI= O-H Downtown 006",3R 664-MONT€R&Y DIR G€-GRGE-B-NIGHOLS-H014SE 0-H Downtown 906"4R 696-MONTEREY SARKEGlS-LIBRARY RF-H Downtown 7 7 MGN—TE EY MURR,4? ,ND BE• P+z-H Downtown 7824. ^NTERE-Y WSSIO -S -L O G-D-S-H Downtown 9427- 0 848-vONTFPE 7tGECi/ \ERY G-D-H Downtown 04-ZM G 849A4GNT€RE-Y SINSk:EME-P.-BIJI.6DING G-D-H Downtown 943"3G 868WONTE•R€Y MAO'S-GROGE-PVY G-D-H Downtown 0434-03G 955-M G TEREY ANDD=RSON-•HOTEL G-13-14 Ekwantewn 94a2-96G 362-MONT•ERE-Y BPUPtiNER-S�-DING G-D-H Downtown 9122-05G 998-MONTE-R&F ANDREWS-BUILDING G-D-H Downtown 0435-M 4G354A NTsRE-Y FRE—M. -T-HE 9-ER G-0••H Downtown 0436--03G 484-5wl QNTEPZY MIONDAY-GL6B 6 T-S 043-7-03G 222ZMIONTEREY 4t:ESTQNE-MIGTELANN G•T••S 94a8403G 4.406-MORRO SNY49EP HQUSE R-34-1- Old-Tewn 9071-04R 4&"-MORRO MARTMA-DkN IAP-4�i-'OUSE R-•2 H Old-Town 9445-7-05R 4624-P. GRR-0 136qL-LARD-HOUSE R-3-•H Old-Tewin 987.2-04R 4636-MORRO BAKER-HOUSE R-3-H OldTewn 907.3-04R 464244 RRO ALBERT-HOUSE R-34M OldTewn 087.4-94R 994-NIROMO HARMIONY-GREAMERY O-H Downtown 8439-056 420"IROMO PARSONS-HOUSE G-D 007-5-05R 4344-NIPOM,O STAT€PHENS-E-RS60PAL-GH4-JR6H--R-2••H Old-Town 9444-030 4.407 NIP4W G PATTON-HOUSE R-3-H Old-Town 9876-94R 4.428 4POMO RQGERS-HORSE R•2 H Old—Town 097-7-96R 4.446-MPOM0 NIG-iG6S-HGUSE R-2-H Old-Town 907"5R uE Tnr I 890-OSGS TEASE-HOUSE O H Downte m page-ie Attachment 5 H!sterscal-Preservat;ora-Prog)rarh-Gui�elines�-^�ppendi-�B . Address ur st-W;C !-ame Zone Dis!!Gt Ser�--LINLL 976-GSGS GOUNT-Y-CG iRTHO icy R5-H Downtown 0442-040 4304-QSOsi FRET B PTIST-GHIdRGH Q 0-14-3-030 ,"Y42 -GSOS FRAXI,'-GAM PREL"4lTCH€L-L-H,0USE—R-2-H Qfd-Town 0-1-74-058 4443-GSQS M-E-NA6A,-HQUS5 R-2-H QW--Tewin 008M3R =1-700-QSQS A66EN-HOUSE- R-3-H Qld-Tewn 0084-05R 4 14-OSOS HAGEM NLSAN4T-ARIUM R-3-H Old-Tevvn 0082--04R 4-84&4DS0S PAR QPZ4D"Gq—EL GA-S-H Old-Tewn 0444-056 8634PAG4FIG ZRQN-LUTHE4%V4-GHJJRGH 0 0445-04G 4406-PAGIRG KUN9ERMEB4GAL-BULDING 0 0U6-036 - x-85-RAG!RG QALUDET-A90SE 0 0083-030 800-PALM ,4H-LOU S-STORE G-D-H Gh-inatewn 04.4T-03G 99GPaALM SAN-TIS- &ISSPG-GI-TY-HALL PF--H IDGMtGWn 0464-050 4444 PA-6M, PAY-NE HOJJSE 0 0084-03R 4-305-PA-6M RI-GHETTI AP1lRTMEN-TS P--3-H Mil!-Street 0085-05R '3-�4^-PAL-M RI&HETT HOUSE R-3-H Mill-Street 0086-05R 7442ALC)MA-R SANDFORB- IOUSS P.-4 0087-005R "O, 1z74PEAGH "MAIN49-H06(SE R-2-H WI-Street 008"6G "Or,-�B PEAGH MA-INGANGHE-TF4-1=40USE R-2-H Mill-Street 008"4R 2804NSMO OLD-GAS WORKS G-S 0448 04G 569-P SMO SIB1366-HO lSE R-3-H Old-Town 0950-02R 649-P4SMO INIGNIANUS-HOUSR R-2-H Qld-Towft 009-1-931 674445 -0 LEMN-HOU R-2-H Old Town 0092-,05R 6-76-P,11WA0 GRED41OUSE Q-H QldTown 0093-04R 4446-WvSM9 VOLLME-P-HOGS€ R-2-H Old-Town 0994-04R '„ ;"® THOR-NE-HOUSE R-2-H OldTowR 0095-05R 434x-PURPLE-SAGE RQ4DR4GlJEZ ADOBE R-4-P-B 0460-03G 40 P.P&ROAD SOUTHERN-PAURG-DEPQT G-S-S-I-4 Railroad 9449-04G 1024 RAILROAD SP-TRANSPORTFAT4C) -GO-BLDG G-S-S-H Railroad 0468-02G 4336-RQWNDHOUSE SOUTHERN-PAGIFIG-R864NBHQJS€ GS-S-H Railroad 0469-02G 4 793 JRSARA-GA�,HQ 1= R,a railroad 9096406R 4714 SANTA-BARBARA-WIt - A?A-M:E?lJFF--HOUSE R--3-H Railroad 0464-05R 4q25-SANTA-BARBARA-ALEXANDER-GALEMI<4-H(DUSE R--3-H railroad 04-62-05R 4763-SANT,4-BAIRBARA--TRIBU-NIE-R-SPUBLIG-BDIL-D4N6 P 3-H Railroad 0452 048 4880 SANTA-BARB.ARA-GI IANR4E-L-GOMM-ERG4AL-GQMRANY GP.­S-H Railroad 04.54-.046 4Q40&AI;ITA-BARBARA-SAbLTk,E-P,N42AGIFG-k/VAR-ELiG 4SE G-S-S-H Rai!read 0a-"4G 4445-SANTA-ROSA K4-NBER6ART&N-SG-w 01= PF-H Old-Town 0097-949 4631-SANT-A-ROSA A9R4ANGE-G J P.T R-3-14 OldTGWR 099"5R IOTAL,%'. thiB€AP,OF 4ASTI,zR-L4STP,ROPE!ZTlES=!T-2. Rage-24 Attachment 5 u iste.i�al-Pxeseafatisn-Rog ra�-C uide3i aes�RppenC ix-6 G—�edL-res—Ior—adds .g—pmpe�tEes =-to—t-:e—!"Aaate�ist—off—!_!istet:s Resources Arty-perseR-naat-request-that-a-prcperty-bs-added-te-the-{Taster-1=ist-ef-Niste Teal 4essurses�he-6c�t.trai-Ne��tage-Semr,�it�^e;-/ti:eh eett�raa!-P<e:;ewv-6c3rr�issiso� RanM;ng-Gomm.issien-er-the-QV-Geansikvrtay-a Iso-o-nitiate-an-appl;eatio n- %.—WhL rve-.and-H 3LY-to-A-pp!y ,-standard-applieation-forrR-must-be-caFnpleted-and-sL,bmitied-to4be-Gem-r-nunity Bevelepment-BepaFtmeRt--The-femi--must--be-aMGM"riied-b"I(-available infvmat;en-that-deeunients-#he-histerical-importance-and-a e-hitectuFahcharacter ef4he-build ing-or-site- There-is-no-€e Oar-applying-fer-k istsrieal-P.eseuree-desgnatien- P-cr nfesnatior-a'beut-data-sources-and-help-with-preparing-an-application; eORtaet-the-Qltufal-HeritageGern idea- 3—Aot ans-Wh9-Ca.lI•.uemt-Her:t'a ys-Coorn–rittee The-GaltuFal-HeNtage-Go ittee4GHG)-evil!-re-iew the-applic-ation-and-deeide Whether-o eNtts-eenside¢atien.--4f-the-GkdG-f+nds-that-ars•-applieation-merits esRsideratien,a-public-hearing-wit-be-seheduled-and-td.e-aapplicant-MII-be Ratified: T-hhe-4sie date-a,qd-ptaee-e€the-publir-heaar.g-Mll-be-adve aided-n4he4degrana TAbane-RewspapeFAt--the-pub;;e-searingr-4n-ne-ease-mere-thaca-69-days-#ram the-hearfng-date;-the-GHG-w ll-reeommend-that-4he-preperEy-be-asded--er--not added-to-the-Master-List-of-H isterical-Resources—When-evaluati ng-an applieatieri,-4he-GkGwi'.1-used-the-attached-eriteria- 4.---Actians-bj, tho-Qty-Coune iI INiftn-sixth days-ffom-the--GHG-action-en-an-apptieat'sen;the-Gity-Gouncil-wi8 dee!&-ifbe-prepeR-y-shftld-be-added-te-the-, !aster-Gst-eWlistodsal-Resaurees: These-deeisiens-will-be-mnade-at-an-advertised-pub!!s-hear ng--:F:he-applicant-":ill be-nits€ed-of 4he-heafing-date- lri-makis.g-t#�ese-deeisioRs he-City-Geunsil-i•�ll-consider-tl.e-GH," resGmmendatians-pablie-4estjmany-and-application-Raaterials-.--Tho-action-of-tbe Gity-GeuRcil-is-faa� lfthe-Gity-Geuneil-approved-the-addition-of--a-property-te--the-Mastef-ist-of ktisterisat-' seume-the-Gity-Glerk-wild-send-the-appliearnt a-espy-ef-the-ceuncil s-action- Raged ' 1 Attachment 5 Nistoneal-Preservation P-r�Ggran:t-Guide;ines:-,ppendix S G!"f S,n-L-u;s-@b!s,^.a&.•!W,rat-Per4tog�Cv mittea Delineation-cf-Historic,Resrurce-Griteria4ar-B,;ldicsg-Ev:!aat!o"nd Recommendations Arehiteetura!-GMeria €---Style 6esc-r��es-€oR�f�aildiRg-sash-aJ=�,ze;�s�ruett�ral-ssthape-aid-de:ai!s-�r,�thiR td�at feFn+-4-e-ar-raRgment-ef-windovas-and-deor�erna,me-ntat;Gn,eta) Building-style-will-ee-eva4dated-as-a--n,casure-o€ 4---Tfie relativ"uFi"f aAraditienaksty!e�-as-compared-te-building-styles-in-San L.uis-( bispa , 2—Rarity-of-existesce-at-anyr-4irne-in-tbe4oea1e,ander-eurrent-rari."!though4he stFuetuFe-raRects-a-enc"opular-st)le 3- TradAisRar „asulaF--and/ef-ee!estie-iRfIL,ences4hat--Fepreseg a-parHeulaF seeiakmiliea-and--peded-o€-the-eemfnunity;and/or-the-un;queness-of-bybdd styles-and-he,,m4hese-sty4es-a m-put-togetho F 4—The--degree-te--,whieh-the--stFuctur-e-has-maintained-4ts-iR4.legNV- .(-,. assessment-of-alterations-and-str�:stura I-eo nd!tien�»ow.9): 1E- Design Bess-rites-the-are itect-uFal-ceneep4-ef- t ueture-and-quality-of-artistic-rRent-and craftsmanship-ef-the-ndMdual-par{s-P,eflects-heti%-welha-par4ioular-style-or eGmbiwatieR-ef-styles-ar-e-expressed-thfeugh-se-patiaility-and-detailing-of elggests-degree-te-w-hichA-he-arehiteet-(i:e,oaFpenter-builder-) aosuFately-intepreted and oenveyed the-stylecs� Banding-Besigrr�vuated-as-� "f: 4—Notable-attFaotiveness-with-aesthetic-appeal-beca-use-of-its-ur.;queness, aFtistle-me4, retails-aid-eFaftsFnanship; 2 ae ll-attmc-tiveRess-because-e€-craftsmanship-and-aesthetie-value;-hough Re"ecessaFi"nique 3. AR-expression-ef-ntorestiRg-details-and-oc!eekeisRa-among- car-peRter- builders�, ltheugh4ha-cratlsmanship-and-artist-;&quality-may-not-be-superior: ll+--Age Age4s-a-measure-e�f;ew-Feiatively-o ld-a-structure--is4n-the-Gen text-ef-tbefiistory of-San-6uis-BbispG,-pFim.aO"ng!e-Ame,Haan-h!stery- ;rca4850j-¢See-Sca!e-o€ B.uildiRg-Age+- 6nteda fer-Buildjng-€valuations la{:Afchitect Page-2-3 j((} _J Attachment 5 HistoReal-Rreservation-Program-Guides inesip pend i--G Besc-ribes-the-prefessiesal4an-ind vidual-or f.,mn-)-direetty-respcnsiNo—for-tho bailding-designrand-pans-ef41struc-ture-. T-he-arebiteet-will-be-eva Bated-as-a-reference-to-: 1. A master-arehitee"(e g.Wnght) 2—A4n<nown--arc-h Leet-wbe-¢Wade-sig^ificant-contrfbu#ons-te-the-state-or-region (e-g dalia-Wright) 3.An arehAeet-who-in-teras-ef-eraftsmanship;-rnade-sign¢feant--centRbutie,ns4e Saff-Lais-Obispo-o-.g--Abrahams-who;accerd;ng4e-fecal-sources-des;gned the-hoaFaftk-Avila s-father's kerne--built-betwec^-402-?- 4—A -early+-architee-t--who4s--otherwise-o€-ne-spec;aksicfificance-bat-oan-be ;dent,€red-as-a-professional-{e:g--piereef-arehitects-ef-the-region-as-eGn-fc ed by-A44A--arehiva4 membersh;p-records-of-Galifom�&-and-thc-GeMrakceast}. V—. Envirenmental-D gwG-entinuity BeseRbes-4he4Rtef-relatienshi"f--str-sEtures-ard-the;r relatiensh,p-to-a--coif n en epM enment R-Refenss-te-the-sontiRu;ty-spatial -elatienship7�-nd-visual-eharaeter-of Q-street-,-neighber-hee�er area. E-nv,renmentai-des,g;9-centinui" !!-be-eveluated-as-a-measure-cf-the 4- SMbolie pa ee-s#-a-structure o4he-cerr mL:n tjr-and-the-degree-te-which it-sepves-as-a-censp;eueus-and-pivota"andmaFk- .e.-eas;ly-aeeess,b!e-te-the publi(a-helps-te-establis�nse-ef-tim,e-and-place)- 2—Gompatibil,ty-ef-a-structure-witk--neighbering-structures-in-its-setting-en-the basis-ef period-We4fem+,-height,reosf-lines•},-design elements-Landscapes; and-natuFa 4eatuFes �ow-these--Gambia.a-together-to-create-an-;ntegfai ealtmr-al-kiisteriG;or-styaistie"setting: 3-- imilanty-4o-and{er-compatibflty-ef-a•stfuet4jre-witl+4ts-ne,ghbon ng-sttruckwes wh;Ghreel;eetivedy; although-of-ne-pafticular-aosthetiG-value-c-on,,b;ne-to-fern} a-geogfaph;ea!!y-def-nable-area va it4:4ts-evm-d*tinctive-character, Histeriead-Grite is Vl—l=listepy-Pc- n Deseribesr-a-pefso -group-organizatien;-eF4rstitut;en4hat-has-been-conn,eted witch-the-st€aeture-either-;ntimately-or-sceendaRly;- F— least-tee-generations (- e-49-years-} HistGAc-a l-pePsera-Lvidd-be-evaluated-as-a-rncasur-of-td,e-degree-te-vfh;ch-o-persen er-greup-was: • S;gni€cant-to-the-community-as-a-publie-leader--(i.e-mayor-,-eongfessmarr ets.-er-feF#ic�er-fame-and-eutstanding-mGsgnitien- 4oeally-rGgiGnally;er nationally: 2— ;gn+feant-te4he-communit�r asra-publ;e-servant-who-has-made-early-a nigue; er-outstanding-eentfibat,ens--te-;fnpeFtantAec-ad-a#airsrer--;nstitutiens- .e GGun64men;edueaters-medieai-prefessienals-elergyfnen-ra;!road-ef'io'rals). Attachment 5 Historiea'kQmsewationr -egrqYrn-G ide,iSes. Appendix--G 3. -vshicla-though-minor-di rec !y-onhdirectt)�,-had-a-beneficial effect--eR--the-community-{d: :-firerrtsrr as`.w-e,�#ersemert-s#Ecsr�-posta4 vtGr-kers-bbsiRee�ssmen<shapkeepe,- c*y-em ployees;-etc:-}: W-iistsfy-€-vent Assoeiated-with-a-sec_isd;-political,-econem e;-go\,,,emR,enl,a;,edpeational-er-ott sr Rstita�tieRal-svvent-tea#�a:�-bsen-irpsrtar�t-to-the-eomrRURity: Histo-iea�-eveR*^- u itte-evaluated-as-a-measum-of: 4--A-4andmarl-,-f -neus,or--ff-st-cf4ts-! ,nd--event--tor--the--eity---regardless-e# whether-the-impact-of the-event-spread-beyond4he-city 2. A-re aWely p�que-or-nteresting-eontributjoa-to-the-s ty-¢ae-tae-Ah-6ouis Stomas-the-eenter-for--r�lRose- -met ean--e-ultural-anti`,aies4-nearly-San--L-als Qbispo-hi Fte- a-A--eoRtnbutieR-v�-hlah;-Aiie sgb--minor;--neve heless--vias-imporantts-the GGMMuni4gi-.e leeaHnterest-croups-);c;s-alterra-tively-a-aaique-er-interesting eGRtr6ut Gn-Gnty4GGse4"GRneets'd with-t,e-stf-uetU,% ebjeet,--Site;or-d€st,Ret- Vl I—Kisto y—Gontex:t Assesiated-with-a,Rd-also-a-pdme4itastration-of-predemir4ar:t patter-rs-ef-pelltical; social eeenomic; eulturaa medical; educational; governmental, military industrial;ar-religieus-history- 4isto0ea-eenteri-4-wilh-be-evaluated--as--a easure-of-t-he-ddgrEo-to--v;biGh-it refleets: ;�-�a, 'fst,-.ei-majst-patterR-s--of--beak-histGpt,--mgardless-of-whethe-F-the Nstemeal-ef#eets-ge-beyond-the-elty-level;-that--afe-intimptely-con-neeted-with the-bpildin m}: 2• seeendaFy -pa#f s—e#-lseal--hmtery-batt-elesely- sseeiated-with-the-building (i.G-. Fk-Hetel) 3-Secondary- ttems ®f•lseakhistof"ut loosaly-assseiated-v, th-t-he-Cailding. Wstofical-co e)d-M!pals-be-evaluated-oA-tbe-basis-ob 4:-Whethef-er-Rot-a•-st-Fusture-ossuples4ts-original-site-andler-whether-or not-the sfiginal-sundatief�-has-been-shagged if-k-newR: Page-26 Attachment 5 Histenc--akPFeseFvatioR-Wegfam-Guidel nos=4pendtx-9 �—L-is;*-ef"ceR±�E�e.* ^g�faYsrQ:es-ssE.-0�iFs-!-'.Ee*erica!-�reeeF�a: e:�-Li�t�i�;s �V��V�a7NL L L.vlla7 VC7'La7 r.J� Updated-ApFi[2008 4428-Beach '654- lichen 4442-Buel=ien 45294Beaeh 658-Buchen 44.89-Suchen 442-&eck;; 664-Buchen 44-90-BuGheR 48-BentoR 665-Buchen 7.42-Center 4-WBread 670-&lichen 755-Center 207-Bread 67343uehen 30-GhGrre 236-Bread 676-80-Buohen 45-Gherre 282-8read 67.7-Buehen 59-Ghome 394-Bread 685-Buchen 6-3-Chor-re 368-Broad 7�2-&lichen 69-Ghorre 3&443read 7-7-043uc-hen 44.5-Gherre 397-Bread 874-Suchen 446-Gherre 463-Bread 8€0-Suchen 458-Gherre 456-Bread 885-Buchen 47-3-Gherre 457-Bread 889-B uc-hen 4.83-GhoFre 464-Bread 96643uchen 499-CheFFo 47-Z-Bread 973-Suchen 244-GheFFe 967-Broad 9.74-Buchan 360-GheFFe 97.&Bread 494-543,uchGA 368-CheFFe 1019-2.3 Bread 4935-Buehon 369-GheFFo 44054Bfead 4045 BUCbGR 375-42;heFFa 440849-Bread 4.054-BuehGR 395-GhoFFo 4448-Bfoad 405 -BuchGn 39&-GhOfFo ,"'',-,z-B ead 4067-Buchen 434-Cherre 442743fead 4440-Buehon 463-Gherre 4505-Bread 4448-BuGhen 475-Gherre 4541-4-3-Broad 41.24-BuehoR 482-Gherre 4-54-9-BFoad 4126-Buchan 487-Gherre 453443mad 44,32-Buchen 94042-Ghen-e 453643read 4435-Buchon 950-GhoFre 4544-Bfoad 4137-BuchoR 970-GheFM WG43ue-hon 4444-BuchoR 9.3x8-80-Ghorm 53343uehon 4445-Buchan 984-GhoFm 549-BueheR 4.4.54-Buehon 4{}23-GheFm 54943ueheR 41.52-Buehon 4141-0-hoRn 5.8648-Buchan 4457_&uehsn 4449-GheRe 57543uehon 4460-Buchan 4634 GhoFFe 578 BuehGn 44-65-S6-chen 888-Ghureh 594-Buehon 447G-Buehon 893-Ghureh 644-Buehon 4475-Buchen 97.4-Church 654-Buohen 4476 B-lichen 972-Ghurch Attachment 5 Histo,deal-Preservation-PFogra,�Eside!;Fes.Appendix D 404 -Ghureh 77 liguer-a -144-7-Islay 4848--Ghursh 77449-Higuera 40224slay 4.822-GhurGh 7.82-09Higuera 4-029-Islay 482 -Ghureh 858-H!guera *34-Islay 1-834-Ghursh 97-9-Higuera 1-035-Islay 4€5-Gana 335-!-!iguera 1049!slay 4694Dana 49-1-Hill 40444slay lana 44.36 Iris 40454slay 6224Dana 44,INas -W524slay 6264Dana 4440 Oris 1-0534slay 58.1-Dana 1204.40s 1.0644slay 643-Dana 4544slay 4.0744slay 647-Dana 462-4siay 444-7--Islay 577-Dana 4684slay 4420-Islay 5779-Dana 48,1 4slay 44-244slay 401-8 !a 48-2-Islay 772-JohFsGn 4.045-€44a 5304slay 77.3 dohFsen 4240-E41a 539.4slay 879-Johnsen 12555-€Ila 5424slay --9449-doter 1.265-€41a 5504slay 855-Jehnsen 1.345-E-11a-#4-7 559-Islay 957-dehnsen 4672-FaiMew 557.4slay 4488 Jahnsen 4440-Gafden 572-44slay 4.385-dehasen 4408-Garden 5744slay 24-05-Jahnse-n 4421-Garden 5754slay 958-6e€4 1426-Garden 644-4slay 976-6e1f 4636-Garden 6544x* 'n',��8-Leff 1.843-George 655-4slay 4"'.�2 -L-eff 427-Geerge 6624slay '^Q2°,-6ef`. 4205-Gewge 6634s1ay M5-6eff 4245-George 6754slay 10445-6ef4 4234-George 6764s4ay 1•o6;-Eef; 4236-Gesrge 7274slay -1-059-Leff 673-Higuera 7444slay 754-61nee!a 685-HigueFa 7-62-4slay �7-65-L4nse!n 686-Higuera 7-53-4slay 762-Wnee!n 69 cera 770•Islay a-85-6nee4n 6894Higuera 8274slay 796-64ree!n 785-Higuera 8624slay 442-Marsh 7a 6-H!guera 868AP04slay 742-Marsh 747 kliguera 878-Islay 77�Marsh 7- on u -�Iguera 879-Way 7-04-Me4reeke 723-Higuera 8934s!ay 7064AeiR2eke 72,r,Kguera 9-744slay 744-Meineke 72"iguera 9764slay 732ftneeke 733-Higue-ra 9784slay 77)-wire6e 746-Higuera 9884s!ay 789Mesneeke 75-1-HtgueFa 1-0054slay 794-Meineke 768-70-Higuera 1.0414.slay 804-Meineoke Rage-27 Attachment 5 Historlsa! RreseFvation-P-mgFam-Gr adeGnes=Appendix-D 4462-Mill 4542-MeFFe -1544-0ses -"65- �2 Mil! 1452G-Me" �,� .,G ,,,,s 1468-Mill 452;-MeFFa Wises 1282 Mill 4-528-MOMG 1.626-Oses 1244 Paull 4535-M.srre 7 529-Oses -1-2-1-7-Mill 1536-Morro 4-633-uses 1-220-Mill 1543-Havre 1-634-Oses 1234-Mill 1544-Pdlarro 1-541- )ses 1237-Mill 4-€04-Morro 1642-Oses -Q44-Mill 1.64",4oFFa 1.629-Osos 4-253-Mill 4-72$Mome 11,-38-esos 4264-Mill ""erm 1&44-Osas 4262-Mill 17-29-MGFFa 1-724-Ows 4265-Mill a 734 AAeFFa 1-734.Osos 1,347-Mill 1.814--MeFFo 1740-C)sas 1.3-l"ill 1.821-Marra 1.844-Oses 4333-Mill 1829-Merre 682--Fahr 1343-Mill 1845-MoFm 7-52-FaYn 1344-Mi;l 501-MtMFiew 766-FalFn 4354MHI 644-Mk---\Aew 7-76-Palm 1354-63-Mill 676-Mt-. \Fiew 778-Palr-Fr 1-360-Mill 764-MuFFay 798-Fabry 4-36-7-Mill 807-MuFFay 8.14-Paha 249-Misson-Lo:ve 84 -MuFray 845-Palm 72 Aission 845-MuFFay 864-Palm 7-34-Missian 822-MuFFay 404.4-PWr-n 762-Missien 823-M-ufray 4020•Paim 61-0-M ter-ey 8244Auffay 120 -Balm 614 A%ntefey 836-M 7-ay 12-98-•P34m 658IVA"enter" 851-Murray 1-228-Fa m 66ir-M,�Rtt fw 854-Murray 1-236-Palmy 670-Monterey 8694 -ay 4243-Palm 840-Monterey 869-Murray 4248-Palma 857-Monterey 8,7-1-MMwT y 1-2-50-P-Wm 861-63 Monterey 883-Murray =1.269-Palm 886-Mentefey 884-MuFray 1.288-Palm 894-Monterey 894-N%rray =1264-Paled 895-Mentemy 1445-Nipame =1269-palm. 956-Monterey 14-2-9-N1pam9 1-27-0-Palm 97482-Monterey 4438-Nipam9 1317-Palm 1005-MenteFey 1.646-Nipame 1320-Palm 4009-Mentefey 4-64"ipsme 4-344-Palma 870-Mode 4 52-7-Nipome -1-34-7-Palm 1-000-Merle 1.528-Nipema -1-355-Palm 1336-Morre 4535-Nipame 1359-Palin 1346-Marne 1.64"ipame 1398-Palm 44 &MsFre Q44-Oses 14-34•Peseh 4428-MeFfe 1350-uses 4437-%aeta 1436-Moore 4421-Ores 1143 Peaeb 1444-MeFre 4244-Osas 1111-4 P aela Page-2s J Attachment 5 uistegoal-Preservat en-Program-Guideli^es-Appe,ndi.9 4-1Z44@eaehisr�e 4624-Santa-Rosa a-1-E6-Peaeh 4-1.55-isme 4627-Santa--Rosa 44634Zeaeh 4460-Pisme 4-633--ganta-Rosa 4428-Peaoh 4463-Pisfne 4705-Santa-Rosa 4-206-P-eaGh 44664:4sme 4-7-G7-Santa-Rosa 4-209,Qeaeh 4-q44;- isme 4420-Santa-Rosa 4-24-542eaela 44-76-Rs-me 4728-Santa-Rosa ,22442eaeh 444'J-Rsme 47-30-Santa-Rosa 864-Pepper 44854:4sme 474"anta-Rasa 571-Risme 4439-Pismo 2086-Swazey 650-Risme 44 3-Pisrne 2033,-Swazey 657-Risco 807-Raehel 67-5-Tem 6694Pisrne 2056-Raehel 760-Tere 663-Risme 4020-Railread 762-Tore 683-Pis-me 7 -TRougeet 7-70-T-ere 7z9-Pisr,;o 750-Roageet 7-7-1—T-ere 964-PisrRe 762-Remgeet 778-Tere 856-Risme 783-RGugeet 780 Tere 958-Pisma 4-908-R-;t-h 955Tere 869-Rsme 4-7-48-SaRta-Barbara '858-Tore 977(-'RpiSFnG 4789-SaRta-Barbara 862-T-ere 979-Pime 4-931Santta4arSare 865Tere, 985-lzisme 444-Sanies-Rosa 872Tem 4042-Rune 4426-Santa-Rosa 808Tere 4-05042isme 4504-Santa-Rosa 4423-T-oro 4060-R4sme 4542-SSanta-Rasa 875-6pbaaa 486842isme 4644-Saata4Resa 75&Weedaridge 44-0942isfne 4520-Santa-Rena 756-Weederidge 4264;sme 424-Santa-Rosa 762-N-G9dMge 443342isme 4538-Santa-Resa 4445-Risme 4606-Santa-Rena 444744sme 4617 Santa R-esa Teta!-����e�ef-Gv�l�il±a:Ersg-�-!iste�ic-PffeYert:as-=-5?4 Page-29 mss' -�i3 u istsrieal-P-resewatien-P-mgFam-Guide lineslAp pendix-E E--F-FeSedur-es--€cr--arnond-n ::s*ab!Esh-ir.g-Nlistef!sz!-Pmsegsat:an Disstft is -1,—►PJho-ca Any-pef en-may-request4hat-a-p,oper"r-g oup-o€-preperties-be-neluded-within or--exsladed #� - Gni- tisto,ica!-RreservatioR--Distiiot.--The-Cultural-heritage Gornaaittee-Planning-Eerrxfiissien or-tbe•-Efty-EeLne l-rnay-also-initiate-an application: 2—.Pi h ere-a.'-i d-H o.vAo-Pi p p ty A-standarel-application4op a"rcz-oning! -must-me-cem- plated-and-submitted-to4he GGmmL n ttGeve epment-Depa)t-,•,^entt.Als,-aq-applicant-must-sub-:,it A-map (o-'h=x�1 }.. .m-, he-o€F.cial-zene-map,w#v4he-area-te--Le-c-ha-aged shaded-GFoutknedin-a-heavy;t7lack-lee,and-the-proposed-changed-olearly labeled: AiPfftFinatiGi+4aat-spews-hew-the-prepesed-rezoning- estab!;shnsen"f-an "H" designatio"omplies-with-the-puFpese-and-applieat;en-provisions-o# Ghaptep47-.54-of-the-QtyLs-Zening-Regulations{-see-attached-exceFpt;: RFeperty-ew sers'list-and-rnap-show;ing-t ie-area-included-in-tlae-list-EPeF instFustions-eFl-haw4e-pFepam4he-preped"wneFs'list;ask-#eF4he4nstFuerden sheet-"e-GoFnrnanity-Development-Depa#rnent j The.., hn c„ feF F g-an-applic-ation-to--create-oF-arnend--a--Historical Preser'v Aelves—v^,qtr;et—rFe—mere—ifi€eFinatierT--"GU"Feparing—a—remising applisatien,-phone-Gpvisit4he-4&em-munity Develepment-Departm- ent: 3—.Asttons-by-t e—Q-ty T#ree-grsups-review-arid-aet-on-applications-to-amend-or-er-etiazte-a-,Histei ie Preservation-Distraet: 4_ Tbe-GulturahMeFitage-Gemmittee-vriii-schedule-an-adver4ised-publie-hearing to eensideF W district applications: The GHG MR ferward its FeaGmFiaendatioras-te-approve-e-de-„)- n-application-to-the-4anning GGmmission: 2. Tbe-lzlanning-Gerin ri'tss sn-e•�ill-eoFes>deF he-6 6 s-Fsoonin endatien-and-�^�i l send-its-owFn-reeemrF iendatisn&for-aetio"n-the-proposatAoA-ie-G-y-Gouncil: 3 veil-wgkensideF#iae-mec-mmendatiens-of4he-GH"r.d-P4anning GemmissieF-and-will-either-appreve-eF-deny-the-app lieatior�lf-ttie-couneil appFeves-en-application;the-ity Gtefk-will-send-Hae-applicant-a-cop""-the erdinanee-Haat-offFrns Hais ashen. Page-3s Attachment 5 Histodeal-Prese--vation-Rregram-rGruideiines-.Appendx-F - GhapteFl-�4. lNtMRICA-PPESERV.AT!`r"HR)-Z-QR seeticas: 44t54-WO--Pi:Fpose-•aan -App 1Eotion 474 non_.Allo ed-Uses +7-:r.-4430V—.OrepMy-D eve 1Vp11 elft-Stwar,dards 47,44.040 PuFpose-and-app!isatsen-. Ache-H--zone-dent ,es-parcels-areas-or-strustures-that-o+-aFe arshitesturaAy-or-histeFisally impo,tant -an d-(2-)-ma-y-be-eligib!o-for-benefits-offered-t-hrough-the--Eity-s- listorieaI Aresewatien-Rrogram. 8�hed+zone-maybe-appiied-to-areas-witkt-any-of-the-fol lowing-chafactedst+es: a-.-T-he-property-!s-,Within-an-area-6vhere-build!ngs-with-pre=1941-arcfiitectural-styles-create-a msegnizaa' le-sharasteF Z—T-he-propeF"r-area-eontai ns-structures-whish-(a)-are-good--er-exoel!ent-examples-of pre 1.944-aFsh!testufe e-er-(b)•were-designed-by-emiRent-arshitecl"F-designers,-w-(-G) re oorr;. un!ty-arehAesttca!-!andmarks 3-the-preper"F-aFea-contains-structures-that-a;eancluded-in-the-Q,ryt' N.aster-List-o€ H!stGrical-Reseurees. 4--The-property-area-oF--strueture-vra&-owned-or-occupied-by-someone-who--had-a sigRifieant-Fo!e-in4he-histery-of-the-city-regien-state or-nation-(Qrd-'1086 1 Ex-. A1Iport , 4-987-) 47-.54.020 Allowed-uses: Uses-shah-be-as-pfevided-iR-the-underl}ting-zene-(9rd-4085-1 Ex-fit4--part:}-1Q87-) 4 x-54.030 lfopedy-development-standards: PFopeF"evelopment-Standards-shall-be-a s-established-by-the�nderlying-zone-(Ord.. l085-4 Ex-A-(paq,4987- Page-3-1- pS- `� S National Register o€Histarie44wes-Brochurc ht w 'nps-.gov/rr/pubfiFfAPPENDIX G Atta tiCNlJEhriJ�Ln.L9 RR�L7:M:M1A 7JJ e � � U-.S:-Sejmr ftneo -o€-&.e4 ater-ior—, Natoaa.kPa k-se-mee THE NATIONAL LISTER OFHISTORIC ; PLACES T n0� O b -2002 $agr undLp ?C-0 yeetf-,19i-If Qar�+-Frieroide:te 'ere�t�axeke �i't1B�Sj-$otfes�s photo Fria—T�Fioggern C—or�rp�4y Cers«s�;„� rr;•k;sorx—� h� #st�xeavati�rg at taae�ans�stsrvtatstrFdistorie�zte-�anrestorovn APPENDIX G rie-Places-Brochure hnp.-#w%J nps goNgnrfpuhlieationslbulletiisPeFeehum/ - - Attachment 5 rs�e�t alrRs�e} ixdser Esr�r� -&ride-Wi;dso,-i zl�� keeps; -Lsbta �'etz%yr=irxb's'vit�B-(�'�Eo-llee�isrs�';�L��ta'tsers�Itstr3sre-b','�[,^ietZ�'rFadtsert;I�i�elf B�nteher;-H�S&S} �-l3e P.Lati-is�a�-egis.eF•e�EIistorie-Pisces-is-tl;e-ts3€f�isl-list-s-f-tt�s�ATstitr�istarie-� aees bvortdry-,o€preseFatiers-.-luitioiized-rander4he-Natioral-Histone-FFeserv-ation-f4et-of-1965;it is-pa*-ef astiana4-pFogFi eeordinate-and soppert-pribliL-arid-pFrvaate-Lf•€or-ts-toadenti€�, e�+eluate;and-pgFoteet-err-•bisteae-and-a:ebe<>•logien•1-r-es�x�Fees:-�Fl�e�i�aai-di-egister-is a4R i ler-ed4y hell tienal-Park-Sea,,iee-tib-the•&eeraai�) e-f-tl- -nterie- RFepeAier * e etten",cegis*r-meiuude-d• et&,-O-es,-bui-ld•rngs-stFt<,cWres;axed el-jeets-th eriean-histoi3, --eM,+eea,&e,areheology,-engineeFiftg and eaYtare. T�,4 i a1ter-ire-hides-. • all-lasta�e-�Fea�-tFr-tie-l�latisaal-far-le-�ste,� • Nletion 4c-s4.hat-have-been-designated-by4he SeeretaFy-e� e-InterieF fer-t-heirsigrri€ieaee�te-al•1��FieFieans-and • pFeperEies�igFri-€resat-te-ttre-i�FcYcn�£tate-o�eo-nF;i�ityzwhie�i--hs�e-been-neininsted by-tSta'�•r�t�-;�pFesexro�tion-offrees;FedeFal-ageacies�and=fFiba•1-pFese�atien-®fftees; and-have-been a6ana•1 RaFk-©efviee. tmeFiea's-hi,AoFie-&ees-em.bedy-our_ igee s iFi eh&Faeter and:deriti ) e Fese;2 ing ix,psifar.t-listsFieal-tFends-tn-;d-e�e,�ts;FeRee�-ing-the-lives-o€-signx€ieaFrt peF�ons;illustFating distinetive-az-eb-4eewf •7gr�iee az�g;abed a istie desigxrae,'�ieve,,ient and-iFrxYaFtiag in€ers.atwa-about-A�heals-past historie-plaees-tees.npeHieg-stenes-efdie-natian-and-of the states egd esn a ies hrFe�igh��t tie eosin a patienumegr� ofnister-ie-Placces helps pFeseFae thesesig ea hist©Fie pl _ '� og ng--this-iFFeplaeeal.leleii age.4ts p-i�Fiagsat c t _ Frenal pFestattelclle;pFSFriote a-gieateF appfeeiat�orraf �d'T3eFie8�9�=}eF-it$ge;-aP.a-iiicFza�e-ane-crF8af3eFi-the-p{3bli�:r'esrti?r-9tarlding-fli2d-@ppreL'i'PittBn-@f hist e-plaee9: _— ___.. ................. ... .............. .........___ . ..............,... .....-.......... The- lanai-R-egrster-eneoumges-eiti�ze�-,pebke ageR6es id-pr-ware•organniza4ions-to'Feeogtie n-id-asc-the-places•of aur-pas`;4• r-eate-livable-had viable-ee unities-for-the-futur-e: j 4 1 Res�i' ational-Reg•isteF •1 iii Laniee .'l]+r f1'aT1yYTfLtceeFy J•ei�txs"iYT'ruYssl'fi� x 4 2of!6 cii nnne �n � Nation!Register-e£HistoFie-Plaees-Brochure hapAwf'^ nps-.pWnr/publ; APPENDIX G Attachment 5 �*talaaEing-FrepeFEtes-fsr-�19ting-it�2-Plah6rtal Re lei �etCr-IitI3I?diSrlS-Of-,�'�'1�'r�tl3� l�&�kOA&1-1�fS�OFI£ibai36:Fx1fl�i-iES Reseaieh-,-E ueanoiz-iyS�m-aFt(�-eery}rkxal T4s§istanee @atelcAefereriee � ; geesigria�iei�rf-t�ie�arehoase-dTstriet v,=e-ear�•k� .p U have-goaen-gx-mveste 1nwest-and4h -t-nwest-ef &� public-ef€tciaIs-in4ak-ing-a-hunch-ef-el-d-baildings �* ^ that-people--vveri-k--ioelci'ng-dawn-for-parlcinglo>s ay d-t,Yki-tl'iBg-them-t'ato-a-,vib,-ant-retail, msideltial-, ttt��-ef€iee-disst�iet'-(-I-lunger-441o�rison;�-rty-of Cleveland Fla�ttg�€€ee� 4 p '� •.',', -iS'l3Ag-pf6L'rt�e9 lid-th@'lel'a�2fii3&l-�itgiSt('F-e'ftCi3 f - ;ehanges4e-way-eGaununides-gereeive4hei�tisfie �� �places-aad-sir$ng�iene-the-cre�ihile�er�s-� �i�l4rtd4f,'am:aase-.4wor:�Eis7eeL4 p:-vete-e•t'ize.<is-arA-ptibhc-o€€cials-to-preserve these Gkvdand,OH feseufees-as civirxg-par-ts-of—our-eOr,^muiiit'ies---istlz g fI4ereri or-!arid Serrdvielc- chY cots] hGnefs rs ea -it-94rd ®FEanee-Ee its-cfn=mr , , ;aerie-i�ratfi8ixal-�i'E`g-i'Stcr�bv�3 prepexies as diverge IIs a logo it shelter-a'a ®laltoma-pionee-r-settler;Else-Brea!(-efs ..s en iri-Newpe,�d o42-,009-yeaf-el"r-ehistenR-site;has-helpeeck,a:ry-t$-appreeiate the-richness-and-var'iet o�aden's-heritage: �ae-e f-the-'Most-eotrtr4en-�testiaris-Shat-prep,�t�y-swsaers•Yra�Fe-szl3oti-E-the�Altitieaal-R-egis�ter-is; "Wi11-Eltere be restrietion3 onjrry-property a€ter lis'�irrg•���v ie rs o�pri�ate property-listed-iti tete-AI'atienel-Register-ha-ve-no-eblrgatiaa4 epen-their-pr$pert-i-es4e-the-pub ie-to-restere theT'icor-evetrte-mailnta n--n,-f4hey-e-hoose-nat-do-so-9rwneH-eatrdo-a 'ingtltey-,,v-ish �ae�..epel�/-provi. e�- lat-Ci&-�`e'der-a'l-l•Ice-IIsi•pei'iT13' 8'r-ft3Hd flg-'19-tr'1'V$lY£t�i—.�-vi-rhe p"'a""Yr'epeA -e I3er denial fWfF�ii3gf6r-1iSteFie aililtLtg9-1k9i3&lly`fi'03i3es'Ifl-the-fvriiaroi Federal tax-efedits-&r-rerties-whe-choose4e pactieipaEe-;_ +1, grew atien4wir ,eeat�e pmgnm-mus"ol�law4ez ,—Ma y-okhe lr teriar sStandards-fen-PretrahilitatieYrand r$eeive—appravai-�elianal-Park-SeFviee-e€ ;"Vllltat'terrprejeet-in-orderer Eo-r-eeeive-the-tax-eredit: q Q- I=eeal i�toFicaleor i}issioxs desigi3-re iesv ceri titEees $r specie a Eg ere rrartees are � _ I U 3 of 16 54 1200:7 APPENDIX G ric-Places-Breehare �i httpiHww nps-.gavinzVpublieatioasEb4P,etins/breehuref Attachment 5 est-abkshed4yj-State4egtslatiea-aF-?eea4-a di-rareesaafid-an-t,-P,t-pm-4-af4he-ALarional-Ra.k i�F'ate@�9�Iat1EDr84- i�2r-�'re�Fa3T4—T�3�cSE&te-1 iiStOFiL'-P•FeSL-`F'J-Ati9r-�•�-�keC•F^@13d-t�a'te-Pa2a'�`E3F; e eeti��'n �a�F eeFrkFrtkl�it�+-e€€ke a4s-ean-pFeviide-tom r-xkat-ren-or-anySt-ate-of-4aeak;rv,; wttie4rmay-trrf�'c•�t-a�istoF;e-pr-e�,eFEy: >. . Refs fis�peFpy-b}�-Fee®�rzYagkts -' :�:` . � lrpoAmee4e-its-es.Mmwut , state;of fide-#ttt:io� • Federai-agexne-ies;w�4�esepr�r}eets-a•f€ee-t ��". �`� ,�, , RdvisoFy-C-sunei•4-eqSb a;:c�'r�;� fT:slcr:e�is.'r.e�,-Skurs cwa; -Iist®Fie 4d54 PFesens4E a-aA opparVdftky4e Oaeab-=homasj acrri�-�,rricS an he- repeFt3�-�e�^=Feeder-a4 Ac'tw4ies=. • (�reFs-s€-4isFed-pFopeFtits-F�Ia�+-be-ab4e ""� av-:-n,mzz,--rina.Fa�-�HStfiFlEpFeSLI�at-kOR €erd.ng,-w4seF1-funds-ar-e-auai•4able rk additisa-r,-FedeFa�at�testraea^�;f-cFedil3s � . taker-pFevisans � 4-kgatlaFl-te .'���°�°�'� ��,• o s. 0��Oleq ary.,, gryi9� uVllv.� aV Fegt® FA- �T3U-c�j76�-�itt77tg-- i'u^F.T�F{iR�51� � tf-k4�ey--eklso52-rot-to-do-se-F}wi�e;�-ea7'1 E�kace-�kbraryvspeelal-C-olleetic�as-ard de eir}#4ibkg t�iey-auis4l-al�itlrt4ieir Arehives-Depaetmeat,-+�-emk-e•6o1-lectiorr, pfoPe�ded4hat-ro-FedeFai No erk�r�Fiza�ka brriversit lieease,-p.,..m or-fu,iding-ks-involved: 1 1 VJVl�r 4L{l'�A�7 JYJ{.fi 11{rV mate pFesatieFreffarts�pared by tyle lzereF of-I�:atisk�a4-RegisteF� ti:kg aad-made ((,,��,,,,,,:yy��,,���� „1.,,a «t,,. ..,.1 ,.cep• p ''�'a'r,,7 �� Y�Yll[G�l'T 1 �'!'PCC2ti1-C[-LYJCiu uav v,s,ui. va F® a tT'PiT tete-eFea#�a-e•�eeFkst�etiea�business;a�e�z�loxt-epg8�n-ides-E4iietkg�l®t�t-the�4ade$: i�fiekin"3er'ltflfiar - -2gii3�('Fsr"Pg-41•i3t6FTEipFep2'r'13e8-i9-t�r}e oa949'-feF deeisieae-a'aeat-�v4kiel-rpF®pert•ies-,�eFi-��i:aee�ives-or-availa-b4e-l=edeFa4;¢�ir7-sokaae eases-,�and-4eea•4-essistanee, ard+&w4hese-pFe,peAies-sheeld-be4r-eat-L o-s-c-speer- 4l -F 4 of 1 b 549004i N'ati'onal-Register-oR4istoric-Waees-Breehure htgp.-Hww 'nPnovfrirFpabli APPENDIX G Attachment 5 ,�-ices '°�,�'.�;-'a':e�era�-la3te�:a�-R-eveaaae-C-ode-has-eorEcir�ed-n v-a�iety�-f-'inee.��i�es-oto epee t4 -1}i pie-buAdi igs-a'nd-te-spar-r-e-vitahiza't}an-o€'histor e propertres--These-ineextives inch diog a�OQ�o isest,rter7t te�c credit enca�>`age t�e pr-ese�atio,n-e�-his'tor-ie-eer�erei¢l�i-tdt�stri�a�d-re:rta-l-res-iu•'�rita�-barl�•''iY,gs-:•ist�d-irthc Platisaa�-R�g�ster-b�agfawercbkeza3,-treatt�eats-far"retiabiktmtio:a-e d-dissssr�gir�g dest�etiorref-histerie-pr-aperties-•©v,�rcrs-c€-l�ta�ior al-l�egiste�pr-aperties-w•ho-ehcose-to participate ..17t��n4a*4neerrtive-program-.mast-fol4-&w-t'1e- retany-of4he I-�ter�ar's�tanderds-far-P�ehabik-tat-iE:�-and-receive-a�praval-b�-�e-1*Iatiara�mar-lc-uen,�iee-sf �u,�eri-pr®jest-in erg@r-to resew-thQ-tax-eredit-1i�fermatior abs rt t we ed en,...: a tax-meen&es-pr-egr-am-is-on-the-LVeb-airy.naps t e '' ta��er ting-Federa•1-I Iiatone-FYeservatien-Ta-x-I•ncerrtives-aT-lie-address lis nee-seetion-o€-skis-hroehur-e-kifo,-mation-abauHhis-program-ean apse-be-obt�rined-�+-eorttseEing-yetrr-Mate-'1�rstorie-prese�mtion-ef€cee-l,-rfor;rati��-on abta trig thesaddr-ess wad-phone-1,�uber-fer-your-State hister-ie presePaa4G i-of€iee-is-arise feand-ender-the-@ iek Re e�enee seetion-. mueut--Rvf eiado-Am. A&A .Vµe Hii Lem µe-iede-also-ple ide r—F-ede,-al-il,eo tat,, and-gift-tax d�d;�etio-ts-,°sr-elis�table eerrt-Fr btttions-o�pa�-�iatinterests-ire-read-prope�l's'nd-a,,d bxtld�ngs} s �rs gi#s e€gealiified-interes'ts-rnngt be"e-x-ehriV4_4y-for-eet� ne -fftien pufpos ." e-of-these-purposes-i-Aefmd-as"the-presep,Dation-sefen-histoReaRy-important hmd-area-or ei ed histo.-4e-strttet are-" 1>-artier-in-formation-on-easements-may-be-obt'eised fro -th2 eufees4is£ed-above-t- a"c-ta:x-,neentwes-seetion- wen.'klffiston -Pi'md',' va iGarfF an+.s- ter-ksted-properties-may-be-sable-t-e— t n+edersl-his'terie preservation-fend..g;rah Wands-u-e-s ai4able-l-xxfematien abort Feder-a�i f:ie preseFvat'ien gert-a�ist<a^.e�i� ��ailable ori the- r-by reservatisn effiee-leratisn an abtairYing-the address-arra phone-ne�nber-faryonr�tete-h}star-ie-preser-vfttiorre€fi'ee-i's-Pea-nd�nder�h "-trielc R-efereaee se.ROIIOf... -brsehuFe: State4l%+.Orace-fteselr"vutiva"YGyrants-anu Yu.�a�'i0g a'i'rs. St-ates-also-admmtster-State-g mt•assistanee-programs-and-many-of-them-tillem-forpreperty tax e4wE-credits'-for-rehabbAaated-histGm-proper-ties4*faFinatien tared historic preservation grant assistance;preper-ty-tax-abawrnent,-and State-�me-tom eredit-pFeg ms-Wray-be-ebt,rtned-by-c-ontacting-the-appropfiele-State historil Presenvati^oRn'c .ivFraa►tien-on-obtaining-L -add-e sa arh-phone-number-for-your State t.isterie presea t n e€fee is-fennel-under-the-LQuic-lc--R-eferenee -sectien _ ...___. -'�n•y-Ale�x•3eo-somt�,iz�rit�es-are-fee-itg-raw-deve4o-pmcat-w'hie'I�; 'aftheirgh it.-nay-be-vel me from-an-eeenomie perspeetive,-wi-Illine&i 'eh , eal-o€€ieials etW-p"vat�eitizen-sZ�-irl'rrg more-abou"' reser-vingbtril ngs-,structures;roadway-eanid•ers; • pened-or--w� ..appen be€ere '3'ey-dise"ear-Thresgh-ear--fal-planning;new-delve-oprnent 5 of 16 SIV2007 7 10!TT M APPENDIX G ric Places Brochure http://ww nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/brochure/ kdachment 5 ea{�-pFoeee�-��'-�2e�v-�4e-�ieo's-eul;a�a1-?,stage-ear•.-ba-prese�ue�'"�-xcerpt rass�asts-Rrese�aEiet�ptkkis�e�-b�-t�{e�dew-Prlex�eo--lnksl:erie x Ya'-l�i'iaiwaa x c.g`rPste• uSrs[ Ds+�anw•w.cn�,n,.+=D>I,R.�.::.w�c_�,,�ll - �. .•„ . h,rf 8c n-g&Ui7er-ed-deri`ng--idetitiieatioi; 11+ .AZPfir e�'fi�`ti&�fl�S`it�-F-egi5'�&�16i9-tS-Fb"t^y-8FE83tt-i`rk ;� _ ' - ' L preteeden-s�tegies-f-er-t{ister4e-plaees-on-a " . .• :.d . Feder-a`I�Stew-,- d4ees14et-e1: +► Otowi Historic District,San Iidefonso vic., Fede-al-Atfivitiies NM (Los Alamos Scientific Lab,Santa Fe,NM) Fedex legene{es-are-required-by4aw-te--locate; ix�euteF�artd-ae.ai;lr�te�e-itis-�Tatior3al-#egi{stteF-ltistorio-properties--ir7�eF�-eta rters�ip-ar eentre"4w-Fedefa4-ate eies-also-are-respenstble--fer-pr-esepftrt g4isteRe-prsp,-Aies-undeF t�eiro-vwne;•skip-eF-eentrel-`atid�F-assaying-that-aFrp-pFcpe{�-t-teat-r.�trt-�ua�irfy-fe��elus`i9n in4he-N-atiotial-Register is-nst-ina&eAentty-transfeFied said;defnelishnd substantially akered;er-aklo«ed-te-deteFiorate-si- €rEan`tly-d�as-arresult e��edeFal-aetieFcer-assistaace;a histeFie-prepe. yisle be sthstantia ' tied reeerds are to be made €or depesi* +t' the I..bmf7 e° o« �s-ei-�eriey-desipated+ the-Seere�,e kAeri"'-,�—ne fAftre-�erenee: Ateneies-pFepes`ing-prejeets4hat-may-a€feet a-pr-epeAy-listed-in7-aF-eligible fc� -ona4 $cegiSteF{i ry rvane'Li vn iSc(�F"xc-Dic�ei�u'tiOti�-lnde�endent-FederO ageney4h" ueneing-.edemleetiuities,pregram,s,aud-pe-lieies-as they-a€fest liistorie-FesouFees)-an-eppoAuai y4e-eommr ent-prior te-€finding;t4ieenising-or eli-praje2ts-.-The4a"a:-does-net-ffmndate-pmsemefien-b, ie=azderal ageney-md-its-pu.pose4s-noHe4.npede-eAak-develeptnent-tkather-L'Anreeess-assures-that ttie-vat{e-o�histaFie-pr-species-is-giveti-dii set-eensideFatisn-i;3-pro jeat-plang-deeisiaF�: der there-in€ortnatie{rofirt-tiffs-process;�o-t�ellErty-ing-Wet3-s-its:-es�vvva:aehp-�ov;or ee n-l�-IsteFiy`D��ci oaatie{i-&`t�tleadflre�",o�:e,r*^a+�ie " i}ielE Re€eren__��-seetion 'Ions.'.efa+.on-ef-liister-ie=rakies4s also-a-paA-ef- e-deeision4o-issue-a sur-faee-eoal-m3 ing pernm-t;i.-raeeor&nee-wi "., drfaee-.4`irriFtg and�ent<o-1 zhe`t 14 State-Aetmfies-=d—T—f '�2t-A gtmbes ln-add-itien4e-ril�a4iiig-YtisteFie-preen-ies-to4he-NatierakR-4ster,the-State-HisteFie F-reseFv`atidti-®€€teen-prep&res-arm-iir�plertfelits-a-eoa�prel{eas�e,Sta-teevi-do-i`:'-�tyror;e ms�r�tio..l-e l pis rs-tlie Sate programs,�r�fal-assistanee-fer4l sterie n:pc�i�a1:...n r.41nw 41n.. Con 1..' ..���1--�tJ Y Jt6Y-e Yl�. J{�r' eyf-1'[-Y3TOf �lf�p�rTLZ{r�7,�!-�JJ`tJCJTH cJ eFiAg e-]*edef&l-pa'i.3eF vv-at1' r-14. pera*s-bvi'ffi-Federal State,-and .d : or-eligible f r tl,e AI..F:,...,.1 VIIRS I 6 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM National-Register-of-Historic-Plaees-Brochure hap N- ups pWnrfpubli �- APPENDIX G Flegist-er-are4alcerr+nKo-es-.isiderat-io;rut-a•11-levels-of-p a-nrin�ar.d-de velop�..en-� e-State #ists^e Reser a is Of neerelse$rs ides pub ie m€orr atiea;ed eatiarr e td trai7rr.g;and �R�C�PYIe teel.tieal-assisteaee-relating-to-t3:e-Federal-ar.d- tate-lristorie-presex ie"r-egrams-'fibak I+FA.eRe-Pfeser,a en-Offieers-per form-the-sar:.e4a i,e•-of-prese,-Iatie p air 7g aeti�i es ms these-per€ormed-b}-die-Bute-1 k tor-ie-Preser=�sa-ti,an-Gffieers--Thh•ese-aeti-vities-hhowever-are assseiatedwi'3i-histeiie-prepe:�ies-lEeazed-Gt-+- ribal-lards- Leeal-gc nunertts-eaa \. reeeive-Federal-assistLmee-for 046r-preservatienm-wivities TMu c� � 1 - Y W ��+a' _ ... I vv •4e11L�11t�Lat4�1VI��1'fl� laladan Park-Se ice and the � ' t appropriate-State-histerie pre servation-o€€ee-Ger-ti-fed Deal Dove n rests reeeive small-triatehinggrante-and - teehirieal assistance€sofa t13e 3Lzelrso,� :dtcr is.�rie DisFrie�,-.4Lie,"ima,7 ;-d�r1 National-Pa Ic-SePdtee-a-n 1-the ( Falter-&mslitrig��3 State histone-prese�atiort ef€ e4e-ai�eal preservation-ff-ejeets-saeh-as=Pr-edueral-resaaree itrventeries-assess me..ts-oPproperties-to-deter=mine-their-eliigi bi lite-fe;r-loeal-and-AlationaF Register-destgAatier�tiikdaitg reuse toad feasibility shades-a Psig o,Ndelines a�tcl eemervatietrerdinanees,-afld-pubheat4ons-to-educate-tli"ublie-abouHhe-bene€t"f-hister-ie ems. h . eAified r eeal-hover-n.Twnt- gr-un-,7ge-to4he €ellodviag��eb site=vw v -nes t ovEel owe ntaet-t-he-Eesti-fled-)•✓peal-Ge:vernme,-A Pfegmm-a�th^ "acrsavre3s nsted-iirt " uiek-lZie grpee"—seetiOri7. it Vlll'l l<t i�r�VYiJ ull2� 'LiJ� •'�•yi'�"Y�i'V'�''�La'"tr"�..�Y' �aaz-ears-prep��a-stow.inatiptrte-tlze-Nstidnal��cgisstter;�v�r•�itg-�itlrtlte-appropriate S�te�{isteae�rese�atio�^Fn-�z-ree��ederal-Prese�at-i4ri-Offeer,or•�r�bal-Hister-ie Re «: ncf Twit a€€ees-are-part.iers-o€the-Nationai-PttrleServiee-acrd-are responsib�le for-surveying-aod-e-valuat-ing-pr-operties•in-their-iu-risdictions,deterrri3ing-wieh ef-these-properties-are-eligible-for-listuig;vaorl�ing-�witlrirdividaals-tG-prepare-rs;niaad8:is-te the�-Orial-Registe , aR f€eial"niinatiitggrepeftieR�he-rational-Pcegister:lhe preeed irenor-norrriiyatiens-are-found•-iii-36-^C-F4 mar-60.1-whieh-is-available•on4,be Web-at %w,-A-er aps gevAi.-Ado s-h'^..�;�R-P¢rt-60-carralso-be-obtained-by-eantaeting4he er Rzfe slt-the-addreSJ" n4he"Quiel4erenee seetioml�atenRs D NNOMIintuatiion-S Ordinafil ', rnscSLozc^ AL ' to a-- %v07 1014 AM APPENDIX G ric Places Brochure http://ww 'nps.gov/nr/publications/builetins/brochure/ �i Attachment 5 Rfistepte-Preservation-OReer-prepare-Nat enaI 48n mmNea.�a-Sta4&Teviev. Bard-,eampesed-o-prsfessifnads4n-ibe 1-ttist ry, iteewfa-Niistet3�rehiteeture,-pre-ee:7teetiand-post-eentac4 ar-eheolQgy- -angst-her-related-diseipli.nes---anti-sornetimes-e t-iz-e:r-i-nember-s-reviewss4he nomtnatisns-4his-rev-iew-boa:d-:mak-es-a-reeammendati,en-to-the-State-Histsrie-Preser-vatian ®€€regi.-either-to-approvc�-eael�.om:�na�ie�rf-in-the-bot�r d's-ep•i,�ricn-it-,��e2ts-th.e�F¢tional Register-eriteri ,er-t� sappreve4he-rta rrinatiaa-i-f-it-does-not. D t,er-ie-PreseP,-ation-ef€,ev ntthe-propased risni:aatpe. , rsper ovtrteFs a,.d-logial n .sr ities cre hate ed-At1 pr�pe v�rters-are-gtuen die-eppemmity'te eepert)- re-given-the eppsraity to ee3teu�rje:'rto�-tort}inaisn-lhe saner o#=a-private pr$pery-Eor tlte-tnajox�iaeii-sv,�rers-c>€•a-pr-oper��-}-or-a distr-yet-•v;�it�-naftiple�v,�.-regs-sbjeet-to t�Ye n6Tr13ia't10Ti�ti,• c`•tcvxcr'�-ruri3t$F1E-PFE>9ex'�'3t-r0i nri-vnzcer—f'oN+'fr�9-�'i3h''i3®inlnat10n'tE)-'ti3e'-t�rFctlEDii$l Pari¢SeaFiee-s-na.y-fsr-a-deterrrdnati$�'aot;t-w�' ex-her•tete-pre�erEy'-is-e{-igi'oie-•fsr-l-ist.stinag.�•€-a rnajo.-ity-of-private-property-$tuners-do-not-object;the�tate-:£istsr-.•e-Presenvatiorr8f€teer may-appyave-the-narmatieR-and-€sr vu4it ts-tbe-Nationa-i-Par4"ep{Lxee4o be-c-oasidered-f$r }istrng-I-1=t3�e-property-is-appreued-by-the-Riationai-Psric-��er-viee;it-is-o�eiaiiy-enterred-in-tbe 1�IaY.�-agister- ��he�irrferrttatio.ren-the-preeedares-te-�®rrinate-irropertie9-to-tire-Aiational-Register-gird tl3e presee atie prsgrarn N its rsm4he-approp.:��rie preseafat en-ef€ee-'-err-eaft-reeeive-ffie-address wa d-ph,one-number-for your--State-hist$rie preservatio;n-o€€ie"."he-Web-"tt2 N-—siertnps iav/S-h es P9-Seareh-effn-(nc3te this-Vieb-a&fess-does-not begin-wli-%�-by-eenta,ting4he-Natiena4- R&renee-o€ State44istorie-Preservation-9f€eers-at-the-address:isted-iir�l?e"Qaieek- -efere. ee-se a—.. YeCYYICIrIIYTVYYrmmtww 1� kx ale ^ations-•to-ti�e�la�ierra�egister-for-preper�es � ,`.11� v e-9rll7riiit�ed-t0 +�-. -��• yt ,. ti3e�}8ti@i3&rrarn'�vci�iL�e-tld$rtgh-�edeia� ��5.;,u � i '+ . Preser a on�f tiers e.��}}sr ed aget eads 1'Y cederai-agecnoie's'�'repare-bia�$rra�Register `9�'"' .,-�-� nerriirrations,notif 4eeal-ofeiais-end-provide-the 4 �t&aL�-i�l,•.i5428rre-FFe9eP✓attOIi-®f�eeYBki-.6♦1�'k�'$'��'�`-� 1� .4 �• s�. y ' ' eCJYiLY�i'el"Sfpriflr�e�i'ngr�fif}'f�'1$1'LTL'6-th$' `"' ,� d ..,k.. {� Nati�l ervree:--The-)=ederal Preservatten A _ ri .ea-e niinatien-and ertvar it t9 Tampa Bay Hotel, Tampa,FL rP� (Walter Smalling,Jr.) the-P�atier-i�'u.�ork�e�riee-fer-€>zna•1-eoi3sideratisn-l•f theAFetional-Park-Se�iee-approves-t3�e-norrrnatiort;-the-prspo�s-of€eiad•1•y-eaterec�-•irr•>;';e i*}atiorla�-R-egiste� fcrfernatisn-o.rrFeder-ai-ne�nati�ins-tto-the-i*Iatidrial-Ikegister-fmd-ot-fier prreseruati�n ' pf8g£&Lii9 a ed l$ge$ is l@�i$n 'ran^—t�nc'rui DicrcFr7utiOrl�ffi$er-fO'-eaeh ei�+@ti®'n-�fiC-i�x'J-rJTc/�i2d-6Prt�1e-' 'e0'a' kv vbu-ae-hv-gouffederal-htn4 or-by-e-Gntaeting-the-hd-visorj-Geunei•1-on-H•istorie-Presetvat-ien at�he-a reaee seeti$n- 8 of 16 5/l/2007 10:44 AM National Register of Historic Places Brochure http://ww ips.gov/nr/publi APPENDIX G Attachment 5 1�'e��a-na�iens-te-the-�te��ena�--RRegi�ter✓fcr-proPe.<ties-on=Fr-i13a�-'•cnc�s-a;--e-ss'arpit�d-to-tie AI�Eienal-I�zr-le-Se,=aieci;�rrgk�-�riba•}-H-isfio�:e-P��esera�tian-�€freeraYPcair,ted-'��-eae�-�"-r-i•�a-1 ger�e�.�en�e�raeess-�.�ensidering�s,:�r.�t-ie;�s-is-su'astmz*hal}y-e�wa-va-lent-t3-t"e Plseess�se�rq-tl�e-Siete-1�•is�srie-Psesa�io.row•ees-�e€cre-m-�•::l�e-ean-�rsscr,�,e-6�-fess res�fasi�i-Iities;Flee-�5esretar�f-t.'�e-[•titer-ier--rutst-eyYro✓e-c�Tz�1>e's-�,ka,-1-€o:-e��irrg-tt'�etn sift: Further-ia-fertnati,en-on-tie-Pr-oeedur-es-tememinate ' �rFB�erties-on—T-ri�ia•1-lmn�-t3-t�'re-�}ati3,^ra•1-,°.-@gis�-Cr �• ���••�:�® .� 8^n'aSa"icT[i'uiTl-�fe89r`lfa'ft6�1r0�'rai41$'t'3-"u-v�tlaVlC � � � .. ', if8£i•1-the&^ to�fllia�$FeSePIF&ti8 nri,^crcrricer�c dist-e€T-r-ihP�l��:�atio;rgf-Peers-is-a�arilablc•�n-•thy ��.. �,�'� �, �el�-at:-•'vFvr-duce.-np9-�?Q�tFtl)&l-EDr-l7}r-eBnta2tiit�-t�iE -� �t � al4dtster4e4l�reservatien-Rrogr-am-at4he-address grve�-t--rtr-ti^,e"Qu;elc-Reference"-seetton: "�"'-----_ a nki �1+a w w n n �r�f`,•u►i;au3C:o v�i-sv..3-:.,a�ii-,�v2a,� Detail of a commercial building in the �vV2r„^iii2:,�"3 Strand Historic District,Galveston, TX (Marcia Axtmann Smith The-N-ationa•1-Puk-SeFAee-ria}f-aeeept-a-nom-i-nation Design/Communication) dif�m-m person-wr ea-ltevenh:nent-ti f4ne,-asisn-ef-a r.aper-t�-14e Nlationak fiegiste�-i€-tke-prope�y-is-•lee�ted-in-azState••w✓ltere-then-e-is-.pro-S-tate-Hisiose-Preset�ation Pregieni-appremed-by4he-Nati,anal-Ra-4"erviee: �e�i7aYYY'`�i�r'�'�•�'�i'��i'•• , ''1'•i'�""iit"Y'”'i'��i"a'"`YY"ii'ii'vi'�'s"`�iY""YDiCL'�'i'�"�Y Tbe-Nalienal Pa7;.-S e, ;e Rs �tabligl3ed a set er€eri�eria-that histflrie proper6ies tis: -��• fit-OFF der*e he el-igible-fer-eA-isted4n-the-N at-ional-Pcegistep.--Fhe National-}�eg-r-1 er iiia for-evalea;+n g-�e-sign if eaxc-ems:=#tis.ori e-p lases-vterre-�'w�elap ed-te-rte egrti•�e-the aeeeriplish�nents-of-srll-peoples-��lie-have-r>-rade-a een�ibtitien-te-stir-eatttr€r-�'s-lt3story-and last nage the erica are desri-gaed4a-guide-S� eneies; T-r-ibal-gevez-. .z -tles-and-other-s-in-evfgw taping pet�ntimd e. , es i n e adoral-Legis er- GAterin-f o r-&v4:a-n flan the tialit"€kgni€ieanee-in-Amer-iean-hinter-y;erddtemire -areheelog , engineering;and ettltts�re-is-pr�sefi�itrdistriets;saes;br��l�'3rpgs;stretefi�:es;-and-objeets�ra�3ssess-;r;.tegnty-c�€ leewiia t-des-ign setting;matenals,�ver:Emmship-feeling and-asseeiation and: • a-thtrt are assae: �ed�Pt.'recs khat have;made a signiteant eontrih�ttiaa to the broad-pa�erfls-o�et�r'aistery;-ar • b-tltat-are-ansaeintteed-wit-b4ht-� ive5-o-^€{-psYersit:ts-s-ig-ni€teant iin-eur-gtatst;0 •_ �`'1'pR'lIY O` t'fll�{il(�CILe L�•� L.Yu u'L Y.ZI fJtYt •lCRk-ypej per4ed er nx ethad-o eeiratnw6e .a'—esent4he-rver4c-oda-utast-er-,of glia+-p-assess-high--artistie-va-1,,es, fishable eftflty�vhese cetxtpa.eats rosy-las iridivida^'�dstinctien--er 9 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM APPENDIX G ric Places Brochure http://ww nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletin/brochure/ Attachment 5 • d. that have yielded,or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory eF-histeFy: GERM -eGut&; Y-afloas Orth.7a�-e�:x.�teFi.�irEh�lsces;sF-grammes--o€ l�iste�res;p:s�e�•-ties-�rar�,ed-by-Fel•igiexs kFiS�•1•t}4�2®I35-�r�'.SL':�-fBF-Feli$ifl1A9'j3t':F�i6585��ii�itFCS �:�. t-tta�hatfe-beery-Waved-€rer-t-their-e�ghna•1-tecattaa9; I' y r-eeenstfseted-histeFie-ba-rl&igs,-properties-pFrrtan-ly eanizti3er @�flrFL'F.@I�•le9-ttilS't�d&'t/e aehie!y8 ifi,eanee-w�-tom.ast-Fu -slm-1 i tg•1�)•lL�•f•6F-tli+L'�ati6i'cal�eC'gl'3tC'F: ,�,..'.. -••`-•. '4� 3lodvever;�ttc:rYropeFties-vrill-geali€y-i;�t�sey-axe '1 '� � . �tegr-ei-g a�Fneet-t��e-er�teFia;er--i€ ' r�`r'�.°"� t-ley-€s�r�+tt;iz-.ti�fe•Na;'vrugeategat�es•: ":;,...�=';,,� ��•' • a-a-r-eligioas-pmpery�ng—pFir apf L si�tif-iteanee fFati3-aFeltiteet3zittl-aF�Ftistie ? r,.,-� �'� d wten- -histagea4-impe • b-a'„rsiydingo stmetnr-e-removed-from-its or-iginaHoeatioo-but-wNeh-i"igri€}eant �s pr-imaft-1' fer-aimlii et;;-atrv,rrkte,--ice,rw.hx2;-ice the-sup,ivingstxfetere-miast4mpartihnt4y �, «► . FS61-8r-2'�@'r1t�F klt ',yt � • e:-B-birtl; lae e-o F-gF,s:`e-e Pa-hts4ofiea-1-figun Laurel Hill Cemetery,Phrladelphia,PA af-&Htst unee--if iheFe-i's-n"tl4@F �l� (Walter Smalling,Jr.) with-his-predueti-ve4ife;-er- • d-a-eerie FiinaFy�-sigt�i€tea.�tee�retri-graves-af-per-suns-o-€ t Ftseea er t-i�$et asee am-age €FeFx disxinetive-desigErfeatures- - --a.-n aas�rr P112 histefi—G�Jj VF • e-a-r-Leo..strueted-building-when-aeeur-ately-emoted-in-a-suable-en-viraar-ner.4- id presented i� y�i€ed-tnmeF ns paiaf a testaFaEien-.Weston-pl�rri e.ld�vhen-ne oEheF �i•}�'lg aI�struet�tFe•�vitb-•tltt-s8n� �•:�- '-�� � �.:.ved�e,F � •�'cr-pFt.Y��Y'�,'rL'airmail'y-C"fiuiaii2aTiQM'uti`"le'1`?iiL',?t�'i'fd89'I'�•, , 'afli�t94'ia'P�OF symbedevfti'ue-���ig vwn hi ta6ea"ignifieaYne@ 'F e"O • a-pompe ael�it ingsig:. f egmee witrh•.n the past 0 yews rf;4s-ems,,eeptienal irnpeFtanee: d;� ; � ''�� .•- Tfie-l�atioi�al•l�ista�Fese�wa'�-1�4c-t-alse-gives . '..� i T. r('�'.•- � �` ., .'. , 1�ie�C0�3eF-6ft�1L'�'a'tlaniR�-Pceg`•19t-E!r-E4kI�i6H�{6 `� ' .v \ ' r.,, . �°.�det2Fr�iiae-that-1tK�teFie'pF•®peFtt� ligible-€aF listiFrgrtrtiie 1�latiarul-P�e inter si toe�foiZ tall-y s rreina^' ag�ies request"eter-mination of-eligibility-4o-assist e n-their- 10 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM National Register of Historic Places Brochure http://ww' nps.gov/nr/publi J APPENDIX G plttinging¢see eclezal�hctrdi ies'�-Frequently AttaChment esnsens as en the�IetrensN�egister eli i�ili o€e go�erty tliat--ina)-be•a€feeted-by-a-Federa•I Irrojee�ts-aetri•eFaed-he�:ee;�e-Y t,de-rel-agettey-tlae�St-ate-or TFi•'vad-I�sterac�re�e�a�i<i� ®€€tee�-�-a-��tcrested-parfies�hieh-raa3+-igel;;de-�n�,inn-h�bes-ands-Plebde-�{a�vvai-iax-t ergafazat-ions,-iseal-govexunerts�rtd-pemi-t-oF eense-applieeaant-s-lvlen-eo isenstrs-ean,-ist vee6ie-ved-beP&een-dw-patties tlte-Feder-al-agerey-6v&r-egaes-t-tlae-I eper-44he-NatiEnal Register4e-deterstine-whether-or-net-the-p opet4y-is-eligible-More-in€of:nation-cn-this proeess-is-found-in-t-he-N-ational-Register-procedures-36--C-FR-Part(r3-ln--add-ition-to-the r-egtdations; sirnation-eao-be-3btained-from.-the-€allowing Veb-siteNp,7A aehp t eW-er-by csn�a �ei�-end-istsr-ie-Rr-esez�+•atist�-atmos-address-gi�e,•riii-th t�ic�c Reference'see-tiorr. �?ete a stiarts efeliBibility akso-oeeuf-whert� r• • T+&—private-prepe-, ovner--sr-€or-propenes �d ' �vit'r•tn®re-t�sa-o ,e-owner;a-tnajorit�+-o€ •"; � ,` prYnate-prepefvf-eviter-s-obj,eets-ta-listiRg n ' ^a Nat•Isaal4k,a'r1c�ci=vi£etiar-'rr Ieea�-dis�ieis�-rice[-the�Iat�ena�•-aegts� "� �x �� �„� ,, �= efit,eria-fora poses— aH,--westm,ente e_,..,.caR e-feltabikafien-, e the-Seeretapy-ef-the-ln*Fier-makes-e untla*r-a-l-determinatior�ib.it-y, after-an , investiga-li- n-and-ensite-i-nspee-t28n,when-this • _ FL'sereAail-ef-a � ldstoav pr-♦♦a'Yew-melte•�ree'retany..:n�g`n?tilC-e-tlit9 pm �,.,.:1- r / L _ �/+� /I det�rTr]•iiiaTt eeSJ Yi'E�fpllttY�'Q'� i�i f��I�YiVf'L�/"[C�OVitS�iiuYY As the .....-o...:Fl. F cSti�^iWf�i�S�s'�PY�i-E�sS+COi7StiT ar-t�tal-Iistixg deter tnatieris a (.restate-Hiswriea4-geciety-o&Wiseensi,3) ekgrl3ili a tL estrteHhe-r�piivate prep l}-vtt�8pett�'ded4hat-ns 7Federa•1-•lieease; pert-rt;or-€tiz gYs-tnve ved•: re s a st$t�-beneath-the gretriid es erymvliere-aretrnd liistorie buildings vetr%�e4he-bui4dings-are-gone.-And-the st�o,-y-i,;. d nam ie•story-it's-,iet- retie--What-arcl+.eo-logists-are t�tag-to-tineo-vei-i�-a-vfay-ol=li€e-a�td-a�egienetLsf r • at s an eitislg pati o€a etior a4 Register-histerte-sit '- lliarrt-I4elss;Jarnest-own RediseoveFy) Nafimral iffiYiC�CYiYs"ti rks �Fe-reeegnize-the nat�aal-sig�ri•�eaa�ee�propex�ies-that-possess-exceptional-t�a•I<<e5•or• qualities r irrg e 1�2ritege e t}ie�J aited�tates the deer e t3ie the U.-+ ie plae+: Natienel I istorie Ra:dtnarlts NatisrYal l?a .=pec him ' tardy-and-eveluate-these-pT--operties-wit rrn-the-eentex+-e€ perties��tdged-ted,e-netieiiall�-signi€ieant-care 11 of 16 5iW200� �;W:",4AR ric Places Brochure http://ww� APPENDIX G nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/brochure/ AlL achnlent 5 rominated-by-the-Fatiora4-Parlc-&erv-iee-and-onvarded-to-the-N''avioral Pwl.-Syste.,-n-Adv sm7 4,3eaF$-ti�ieuh�-FFtay,-,Freea^tr�c�d-�t(e'-�ttae�c�eFetagy-ef-tlie�J-I��ter-ie�tha�e-�p]rs�e�:,�..-bye-c�es�.-tateed Sf^l'a Fta'lYll'st'�t^i td�t`�aTl�lYL'1®t'�:iCe •taw-ly4isted-in ihe—N-ai't ena'l-Rl zegYsw ,-N'ational Hlster,elandw,arlc-s-are-auteme,ieally4isted n the-Reg4ster=or,'4ets• ey are-desisted-For• rr&.e-mfeFtnatioo-on the-Na-tiaraPAistoFie-barn-Rarlrs-prsgmr t ge-te:�]L�� ,gWnh�1 or-eoFitaet-tt:e-1L'stiaral�'-inter-ie�ar-ydrosi•lc-Ss��ey-at-t'�e-address-l-is-ted-i. �� Biel: R-e€ereree-seetion Tie presen atio rof his ifreplaeeable heritage-is4n _ dwe-pit'alie4ntenst so4at-its vi1&Hegaey-of-ealt-Of P 1 s edueational-aesthetie; I rnspn•atiora'l eeore-.Pie m-id (f" ill . energy--bene€is-will-be marntaiTned-wid-emiehed^feF €uWre-generations-o€ A men' euns--€ro.rt tape N-ation"-isterte y'! a izFeser�at-ioa�4et•o�-1.9(yH_J C/hcslestam�l,�,z.'r,�-}frsta��Dis.'sictit;-+Efi�,rtestarr;�E (ase FBsaefi ) Ye fYYOl- Is Y\'�J�iCJ�\.YY� \.NY'Y'U'xx� til'IIYY�xYY� L�'YL���xlYYtalee The AFatienal-Reg'istepis- satiori,-ffi' terpretaden areh-en-oar-past-and-the-places4hat-doc-um-en"ie•ee;1 -ibtitiens-o all 13 tlartal-l�egisieF-and-its-warietts-resesyeh;edueatien, ' ee-e€fe�s-is-leeat�r,�,`-��'at'i®nal-A.�gister-ltEtriapag�"-eta 12 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM National Register of Historic Places Brochure http://ww' nps.gov/nr/publi APPENDIX G wvtry eF n;s ®v�nF Attachment 5 -T-h LT'-A- V'aa"Reg"Me--Gafleet-o u',iu i.h-,- ".fiiwnal-Registe.--.F afrVm alfio-ai' &Yten -The Nat4ane��-C-skeet3sr-daeumentste-pr-operties:ts-ted4n-ard-detem. rued-eligible €eF4he-R-egister-The-&c-ui:rentation-en-each-prcpertyf,rovi les-"hysieal-deseFiptien-of4he pleee;itrf�F;Fifrtisn-abatrt-tts-lei-s�Fy�ard-sgrsfckree;a-bibli br-aph�photagraY':s;ard-;:auzs- R-eseafehers-ean-tak-e-a�tage-o€A-is-u-.sparalleled-eslleetiers-in-a-war-n'aer af-ways---The �•atisrul-Pzegister-ln�'o .- stent-(�e��S-,.-est�p�tte�ed-i�tdex-te�lze-l�tatisnal Register,-is- --Aa-ble-to-tlie- ub ie-t -au lythe-Web-at:::, . :� a-ceheFs-em visit-tz:e-1*lad-feral-R-egister-eskeelisn-a�-l�e-1•-�ye-S-�N-V�•ir�J4�aslri-ngtsr-�8:�'aetween-4 atn•--rearrPalonday-t17Fsttgl�r�hatsday-e�eept�-eder-al-halidays-�op}es-a�irdiu-id�tl nsmana�isns--can-?�e-:eeei�ed'-ey--esntaet3-rg-t1��R}a.-fans-l-R-egis�e-r--l�efeFecee-B.�sl<-at-L'�e 7addr-ess-grverr in-the"Quic4c-,.R`e€er-ere eei-s7ect-i orr. deos �l e�.latiaral-rRegisteF has d: coped a-l�rsad range e pul-ihshed-a,-td-audiev-isua-keehmeal a9s't$t&r'1L"a•-tz76�er•a'a�rs`cv-air22'i-n c a^aEed9-'saf-cS'tfiti'e9�1''ederal-8g$ite'i$TFatiflral-paF1Fa-, leea4 gevemments nndia § , nvate-eit-i-tens-seelemg4o-nsrn-inate-pr-oper-ties-sad-use-the Nat-ional-Re•grster�h-publieat�et girder-€onn-the Fdatis,al Register BiaFtieF i4rt eonsisttrrg s€ platinnallegister-Bul-letins-Hsw-to-C-orrYpkte-the4iat4orgai step° s nz Hoye-to�4p the Alati,o;7alR-egYSiEi°-`ile;,,fa-r©i-E-ya iatPo d-ReseaFeh$iii'a-H�istorie-PropeFt ,�.-egisti-ation €oFnisrand-a-nt�rnl�er-e€stljeF-teehniea�-bsk'eHns-are-aystrlahle-e r.���-:'.'-eb-at w r--nps"v�nr-1puhlieatiens or--hendin- -ysu-r request-tc-rAlat-isna-l-R-egister-RR-e€ereree l�eslFat t}ie address given in tie Qtielc Fteferenee ^tior Tenehing-wil i4-Y.144st fie? :ween Tea edueatidna4-pWafn4hat-uses-plaees4isted-in the t� - Ntatienal-RegisteF-trance-tmd=itisral-e-lassrosrr i'n-3tFtricivrz-o'rr-.",-fate, , oeiat-stu�3k:' eOgrap ,-ar-ad �xn ,. eiliei✓sed„ -r.>•retkeF-or-net�e�-ear-w�is}t a-site; sfiadeFr�r-eaa-irtvestigate�tistor-fee--�laees-,-tear-aitd-€s� -.;� ;fit - . and-disesveiL-h plaees-a4Pamu-td-us--in-our ` e6iimiuiicicSaaravcmcs-rcraccrior0&d-t}'ieti'le94n -`"k•�1„!\ w x�i'rleFieffli-ltiS,ty-F}�"cr�q �� E-p { `' #'• rtd-e®rnr'teu«.. 4._a z Astc 4 k•1; '+ � ;� �,ettglrlesss�-rplarts�voFkslteps-arrd-teehrtieal fn.PTiarafClre AfaSa.:.a-�lee.tre; gHtdareerand-an-exicir"o'ive-Web-si+,f—T'vvHP--•p,- v-ide.s }rFTTitFr'T�,Ih2F7� i fei radon en pte� suelras�t rg-places t'r (-Ju4Dk-B,oue.hev-,-HA e+aa�g-less®rt-glens;-deei�ex-rtg-eltresan t�nirg-isnerdiseiylirraeezla'aeratiars-the eemer-st$ s,;r(ess r }a vi tEe t by-lristariarrs edueaters-pFeseiatiaaists-histarie site iFtterpFet,rs irad to erns and aeeessi'ale-iri-pFiraa the gib er-beth eaehers ark-ethers-eari-search-&slime-lessen-plans-•1}y-theme;State eer Hinter a bine-peried-Far-rrere-in€omiatrsr-on-the-prGg•Farr,-and €oma-eiampletle (-isto€ avaRaNe-lessan , 1�sit : vlar�twltp�. 13 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM APPENDIX G ric Places Brochure http://ww nps.gov/nr/publicationsibuiletins/brochure/ ........_....__Attachment 5 The-histone a4-and-eWtWahfeundation5-af the Rtathvald be-preserved-as a �peit-e€o�r•-eai�rit�-]ifn�l-leve{a^�nerrt-in-ar�der�a-g;�ve-a-sense-af rieari-pesple- &c-erpt,-f�am-the Natsaal-H-iste,Re �'-rc"a2-FPaiiOn�"ccr:,�9v5� . DIS e6Ie .7' r—r"S"-a1112-mai-[1'e'Y-iil:w 'f'- i'u"-v;' 2�-�'�i'nera.—T-Si'a",n.es The-Nal:iortaPRegister-promistes-her-itage-teunsni-through-tl-e-Dtseaver-Oup-char ed4-I,i-itage travel-itinefarj+-s Ses-.T e-Ai,-ier'aaes some af-rvhieh-ure avai{ab{e in piTnto .rs exelasiuel en4he-Natienal4�eister-Web-site Wlor-e-e liistor-ie-therrre,region,or-eity--by-highlighting, desefil�,ing-and ird�perties-listed-iYrthe-P.tationa3-Register-Each-itinerafy4g-a seW^,,;Rea •ow-4he-t-prevides-deseriptions-ef-the-proper4ies,-msps,--asd-lir,l(-s-t to er pe#ineaP,Veb-Atti-nF-ar-mece-inforriatiar�-ga is the-fello viog�xJeb sites vtvvvv er ii�s ev�ar/trave{ er eontac-t 9ise©ager-9trr-Shared-Heritage-at-the-add,-ess-l-isted-'ir-i the-Q iele-Re€erenee-seet-ion: �kliielaa Hone{nl�l m*vias-p{aeed-on4.e-Natior,a",-gister•in °"'�,��iz�being-on-tke-Regis.er-is-irnpartant-not-saly-for-the-peap{e-vr},o {-ire-here��rt-it-sues-as-e-s�+ntbal-to-tlie�Fa�•ien-thrxt-•this-baa-ild-rg-is i�per�aa�-beea�is� �r�-�ntsz:or�tr-ib�t#-ia�a-te-olt3=natien�liistetj+-as•-well-a s-ta �ta�hi�stot�thrn�it=s-irr�portant-for-people-to-t�iderstan�'-that-there-arc vecpy-urrigttedi-€f'ereenees4hreag[hor}int-&,e Natin - ni-A4a'a-L-api{io 'i n�.a.uti r��Yi'eat'�1�'tl'CP i'iai l5l13i'V"P Q`inter) hlatien'a•1-Rafi'�er�iee - r 10 n oz-vu2^cam•i•r: ne•-t., �'nnz�vn, _ _ _ _ . '�rr� Wmhiagten-,DG-2� f 'ln7/SCA tAnG In^+/2[A '7'111 2024-_,'r-Y-rl t ,This-addrEss-iilsa-applie�aeliir-tgwM u�;st�i:�-laees;DTszQ�oxr-shared-1€•er-itgrge _ "`- t��a�+e{-•iti•�;xries;--and-tire-A}atianal-R-agister ,gfrE�ef,�•zii�zf�ar.,�tu.a;1�d �•��� Rzeferenee-Best EI la�vati Stare liistsrie preservation of eej 202/354 F-nt2jgT9nf �u�Fa�'iYu'"'t�->�i$�v��rfaiTY1u'•ii'u."fi:ni-:.{S-�'ri't�h� Ne+ie - -rr>rkaSurvey 14 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM National Register of Historic Places Brochure http://ww . `nps.gov/nr/publi APPENDIX G N"" r"� , Attachment 5 Washirgtet�D�40 202/354 2210 » z n1 _i�rie�aps-gas-vow r-r7;,s ov � u' a •t�'t�igi- �•.:�"ria�S• �-iicS�u•Tit'-t�EE9'�'�'��2i'v:rvi::.�.iS State-histafi"- terse aiea of ee list xaats c �s o+ Nos "�I PA-s8axe�e xp �:es tae�r A♦�a i[e xr1-�oa€e:eree e]f-&�tia e-His crie-P eserv� en-Ofeers 'YRT9.InL �i L�Q�•C �n7�zvz�vzr�c�i-✓ �;-eendaet�viser-y-Ess��ei•1-orf-is�e�e-Prese�trt i�� D;'&Rest-e€fiee-B-u ',n.-Ig 1-�1-99-Perrmsykv�aa-�r�e��ac,;-�1-U44Seito-3139 Was ti-,-DC20004 Nvww-.aehp-gov 9r-eer ttev-4fi'b-a4-P-rLs p,� iDn-Frog.atat,-H-et4-tage fesor�dm—&erviees i-atiernl-Pag S-pkee i o"n r Street-�'t —M �2� r�s�r-r�—t-r'r , . , icy c,c- 3XaShi-rgt9A-,-D&29i48 F-ederal-H-istefle-Presea atte.-i--Tax-1-nee rtives n-&-Mee-9 NatiermaA- -SeMee 1 o"0 r rtr- rri�nxv-zrr.� Wa-shiVert-DCVO -20-24r3J 72:70 xZ hpS_ifl O@.1pS-gQ Hia'5-�0'✓�i�9�ta� s -msr a a- stoAe-Weserfisc Aduiser-y-Eotar.,-A-er-HBter-ie-Preser-vatiorr (M&Pest-�eem& dffig 4+00-Petmsy e�e-,N Sttite-W Washiag4on-,-DC-24D®04 ?050 aehp@aehp-gav v,�wv-aeh�:�av 0 15 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM APPENDIX G ric Places Brochure http://" `.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletin/brochure/ Attachment 5 Gef t✓eFti-€te&L-eeal-fsevera eta&sgrat- Refiteg�eFvatiGn—Seniees Netiena+-P-aflc-� 1QA9G_S Ai�1�7�1Yi11GG f'�(�4/fS � 1TLT-T� Wfl9hingter,-D 2nV5i 3 7270-x-.-4 �H9te�i'®34i-Fr'1<�i-S�i�tt&�3-H9L'E�-t�ii6l?g�l-t�kl� i3r-eehtre-are edce-n-from-theMdee- N{at-ien teFie-Raees: - 1 'Y1Y1VR"!"fRTl^�T11�'�lYC4'CCSI"S�lg�t-CIL'G"'1�e0't'J .. Y w t:h..d`w q�p'..•a�Tlh s,�_� d1� e �e cegtster-k�eb-site-at $'eltri:reert�tes.-.-rboa;-Rfew�,n'earr, �eati6773S�8(ii49c1YtrT3 �r.,q, of b �ri#tn�t AwNa ienak Register-at (4aek-Boaeher—HAW NatienakReg-in4er--&f-Histene-P4aees �atienal-Pa�;c�e�+-iee - mit-iffgtan,-9C-2024 0 N"enai Reds•ter-1�I blie&tis�ts I e e� Eernr�erts•o:-Quest-inns �RJ 16 of 16 5/1/2007 10:44 AM Attachm PENDIX G ws waw loam I �t cm Ms rC?#mir �.tbeet :Sir:ted-State"e.Padment-c3-the—I nterlar PJatialaaH2w"ergea This-form-is for use in-nominsurtg o�requ ting-Cotartr:rai6cns-at-oligilxility-lar-inCiviCual-p opet fag-cx- t s: Soo ✓Derr Scr s in Gufa�sP^as 1x if mFlehrtg-HrCa J+> �w r-Fortrts(Nsgmst-Ps^'w=aT-8u errs-t5}...Cesmp:ato-a als-Cem.b f-n a�i y Y zt-»a- r-box-or-by-e tering tbeuvgtsestpd-inhume!on tt orf item des:S ry,^ly to ft p-operty 5aing d^^urta mad color=hlq-lar-rte•^ = s'yls!j.item% end-arers-ol-:ig,^,3!?tanca;enter-ony-tna-czw.agorias-acrd-:ubcatagaras-t w�-in-t."•a-in,.^'rtx'.xi.^.,:For-adw:�.sS-spaty-wa-ax^::tin;sa:ion-ghosts (Form4O400a}.�ypa-sH-cntrias: / historic-name Jack Re-rrdence -_...---......._.._..................._ / other-namestsite-r umber--Jack-Nouse 2. Location street 3 number 536 r a r s n S t rei t Mnot-tap-pubtiratlon ci •.town San tuffs Obispo Vicinity Stale California -code CA county-Sian L u-i-s-A.b.i s pa—Code-0.7-4 1~p-code-9 340-1 3.—GiaWJfflVatft)to / Ownership of Property Gategcsy-cf-Property Number-cf-Rescurces-within-Property ®private []bt::ldirg(s) Contributing Noncontributing Elpubllc-lata! distdc4 -........3-..--.-....- —)—buildings F9 public-State E-1 .10 — riles 0 public-Federal P structure -___t._..........structures �79bi�+ obiects Total twnao-of rolatdd muttire p�sporty t�i.�: N.:rr-*mf-ef-=W3jutirg-rescxgrces-previously N J A- ------- listed in the National-Rt)gistor--.--_-0 ._..._ 4.-State/Fede..i-Acs,:.'ry-Cert�.:-:On (-OHP/(lea Only-) As-the-designated-aufti-dV-under-the-National,Historic--Presmation Act of 49M as amonded.4hereby..certify...that-this [nomination El requord-for-doter:lunation-d:-eligibility-moots-the-documontaron-standards for-registoring-propeRtes4.-the National-Registen-cf-Hsteric-Places-and-mee!!;-the-procedural-ard-professional-requl.6.nants-sel-forth-n-95-CF-R-Part--&0. In-my-opinion,the-property 9 meeLsIQdoes-rpt-meet-ths-Nado:ta!-Register-driteris EDSaa i uwica-s ea: S:gnaturs-cf-certiying-off.•ciA / — Date SM_to-or-Foderal-egoruy-aacFtwreau�--- !n-my-opini)rthe-prope+tyQrneets(J does-not-meet--the-National-Register-criteria:EgSou cominuation-sheet: Sign,^turo-af-commarti:g os otacr-official Date - State-or-Feden.J-egency am bur,iau 5-ldatlmrta!-P�riz-S�rrlce`GertifltEtlors 1:ftorcby,ceRity that-this-pr-sporty-lbs ®e:ntered-in-the%Naticrsal-F register--: [�See cont nuatlan-snot. determined-eligWa-for the NaYcrml Regist4 QSeo continut-tion-sheet: _ ©dete�ined-not-oligible-f• r-the f�a�idna!-Rcgwter: ,- Qremoved-from-thd-Natlaru Rogistdr: —T_ --- Sronawre-of-ttw-ICoepoi - Date of Action APPENDIX G se __ 2nt rj Historic Functions(enter categories from instructions) Current Functions tenter categories from instructions) nomeeticf�lnnlw cy�llinn „Y- T. Description Architectural Classification Materials(enter categories from instructions) (anter categories from instructions) / foundation concrete Late Victorian/Italianate walls wood __ ----- roof cedar s h t Aa 1 e Other Describe present and hu.toric physical appearance. Except for the maturation of the trees, the Jack Houseooks much the same as it did when It was finished in the early 1880's It is located about four blocks southwest of the business center cf San Luis Obispo on the northwest side of Marsh Street . The house is a two-story wood, balloon-framod. single residence. /fitting on a raised concrete foundation.. The overall shape is rectangular with rooms locat d off a central hallway. A full porch extends across tte front o:l the house with a ba strade over the center entrance section only. The tall, thin windows are double hung and evenly spaced with a cornice head. The hip roof has a balustrade with a decorative /vent. The eves are decorated with paired brackets, medallion blocks., and a decorative/ rrieze. Single-story bay windows are found on each side vitt a similar design on the ves. There is a third qay .window in the rear . on the wast sid8. It i!: two stories endo w has an elevator attached to it (1970). The exterior sheeting is shiplap redwood. pica 1. of the era. The carriage house and washroom are 1 Gated to the north and northwest of the house. These structures are assumed to have been uIlt at the same time as the house. A utility room is between and a gaaebo is in the &as�OJJern corner of the property. These were built by the city in 1980. The driveway enters the proper from Marsh Street and continues straight back to the rear of the lot where it makes a 96-degree turn to the right and continues to the carriage house which is entered from the no west side. The driveway and surrounding grounds are covered with many mature trees plan ed by Nellie Jack who was particularly fond of trees and exotic plants. ❑See continuation sheet -- -- APPENDIX G B. Statement of SignilIcance Certifying official has considered the sigrubcance of this property in relation to other prope.ueZSi�gnjficanl ❑nationally FL]statewide ❑localyAttachment 5 Applicable National Register Criteria DA E]13 ❑C ❑D Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) E3A ❑8 [:]C E]D [:]E ❑F ❑G Areas of Significance (entoo categories from instructions) Period of Significance Dates Commerce 1881 -1916 Cultural Affiliation Significant Person Archit uilder Jack, Robert Edgar Evan . William State significance of property, and justify criteria,criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. The Jack House was the residence of Roberfifornia and Nellie Hollister Jack. He was a prominent land developer, banker, and ranCentral California from the 1870's until his death in 1916. R.E. lac, was born i.i Maine and came to C-// in 1868. He started ranching the following year by ru, ing half of Rancho `holame from W.W. Hollister. In 1870, he married Nellie, the niece if N.M. , and the toll wing year they moved to the City of San Luis Obispo. When her in,:le died in 1874 Jack bought the remainder of the ranch from his widow. The ranch' ; i.ircle C brand i the oldest brand registered with the State of California that is scall in regular use. i At this time, the irja was main! ranching, both sheep and cattle. R.E. Jaek. brought new breeds and breeding methods to allfornia. As one of the largest sheeptarmers. he employed hundreds of Basque sheepherders and had numerous connections along the 1200 mile sheep grazing routes whi :h ran fro San Bernadino in the south, to Glenn and Tehama counties in the north as well -s east o the Sierras. The drought of the 1860' had encouraged diversification into grains. dairy, fruit trees. and vegetable prodic� io However. transportation to markets north and south was generally slow (ship) and ex .ens ve (road) . The West Coast had just been linked by the Trans- continental Railroad o the east and the Southern Pacific Line extended south to Soledad in 1873. Everyone xpected it to be extended through Sen Luis Obispo to link Los Angeles. R.E. Jack was read - 'or the railroad.. Although wool gr w ng was listed as his occupation as late as 1883, R.E. Jack was already an established anter by that time. In the early 1870's, he was the cashier of the First Nationa Ban- , which vas later the Bank of San Luis Obispo. He was a principal in the banks of Paso "obles. Santa Maria and Lompoc. Q See continuation shoot Attachment 5 APPENDIX G 9. Major Bibliographical Referencc- Guinn. J.M. . H_istcry_ot-the-State_o_f_Cal.ifo_rnia, (Sante Cruz, SanZBarbara nterey, and I : San Luis Obispo) , +Chapman Publishing Co.. Chicago. 1903. Nicholson, Loren. Rails_Across_the Ranchos, valley Publishers. Fr Starke. Mrs. Yda Addis. A Memorial and BiograEhical_HistorY_of_Sa ._San Luis -------------------- --------- --- ---- Obispo_and_ventura-Counties., Lewis Publishing Co.. Chicago. 18917 /continuationsheet Previous documentation on file (NPS+ / []preliminary determination of individual listing(36 CFR 67) Primary location of additional data: has been requested 01I State historic preservation office ❑previously listed in the National Register ❑Other State agency ❑previously determined eligible by the National Register ❑Federal agency ❑designated a National Historic landmark (]Local government ❑recorded by Historic American Buildings ❑x University: Survey M _ ❑Other ❑recorded by Historic American Engineering Specify repository: Record N (1 ) San Luis Obispo County Recorder's Ottice. (2) California Polytechnic State/University - Robert E. Kennedy Library 10. Geographical Data / Acreage of property .81-. UTM References A W I I i I n n J LLL / LL] LLLJ_L 1 I J l r I I II Zone Easti g Northing Zone Easting Northing c LLI I l i l n i J LCL-ILII DI-II I I , I i ! I , I S I , I / F-1 See continuation sheet Verbal Bound/Descnp'kn ❑K See continuation sheet Boundary Just These City boon occupied by the Jack House and its out-buildings.. ❑See continuation sheet 11.. Form P red B nameRitle eo W. Pinar dd II , Member organizati n SLO Cultut a) Heritage Committee date December 5. 1989 street &Jiumber 714 Buchan. Street, telephone (805) 544-4566 city or n San Luis Obispo state California' zip code 93401 G ® APPENDIX G NP8 Ftwe 7PtgD� W! ttachment 5 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number .e— Page e.1 By 1886. the rails had reached Templeton and the local buiness elite in San Luis Obispo were concerned that it continue through their town. To/accomplish this. the Board of Trade (Chamber cf Commerce) was established with R.E already the Treasurer of the West Coast Land Compa the railroad in Templeton.. . Jack as the Treasurer. He was ny which was selling land adjacent to He was also the Secret ry and Co-Treasurer of the California Southern Hotel Col . which had built the Ramona H el in anticipation of the railroad coming to San Leis Obispo.. To get hotel guest from the narrow gauge Pacific Railroad. Jack bought the City' s first horse-drawn rail trolley. Consequently, he was most anxious for the Southerr Pacific 'to arrive in San L s Obispo. In 1887. .the Southern Pacific. asked Jack Isaac Goldtree. and J.P. Andrews to procure the right-of-wa) for the railroad thro h the City of Sen Luis Obispo. Prominent citizens were enlisted fcr this job since the ailroad expected landowners along the proposed route to give up their Land for the "g7df all" cAtizens in the community. Mr. Jack .also represented the City as its Mayom 1890 t:o 1893. This pattern of land sales and hbuildings continued south to Los Olivos and Lompoc. However. much before the land boom was over. R.E. Jack was a millionaire. The San Francisco Examiter, listed /er as the richest taxpayer in the County in 1890.. Nellie Jack was known for laveof reading and was a founding member of the library in 1892 which e•ertually/became the City Library in 1898. She hosted many lawn parties at her house to raise funds for the library. For a time. the Andrews Building was used to house the co• lectio until the Carnegie Library was finished in 1905. APPENDIX G Attachment 5 -.--- i4 fami6a00 - Oil kV"shk fdams ow United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number _I D_- Page !.1 VERBAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: Commencing at a point on the southerly line o,f Higuera Street South 53' 7' West, One Hundred and Eighty-Tr,ree fast, six inches ( 183-6/12 feet) from the Southwest corner of Higuera and Nipomo Streets and running thence South 53'7' West on the South Line of Higuera Street Two Hundred and Twenty-.Five (225) feet, thence South 36'53' East to the line of aarsh Streetthence, Northeasterly along the line of Harsh Street. Two Hundred and Twenty-Five (225) feet; thence. at right angles Northwesterly to Higuera Street and the point of beginning and/being all that portion of Block 62 of the City of San Luis Obispc , occupied as a resid nce of R.E. Jack and wife, and extending from Higuera Street to Marsh Street according t two deeds: One made by H.M. Warden to Nellie Hollister Jack, dated Auqust 9. 1 5; and the other made by Thomas Higuera and others on February 11 , 1876, to R. Edga Jack. and both of record in the Recorders Office of San Luis Obispo County, State o? California. .Excepting therefrom that part�an thereof conveyed to Manuel F. Lima. et ux, by deed dated September 29. 1922, a 'd recorded October 2. 1922, in Book 157. Page 410 of Deeds. Also, excepting tnerefrom, that portion thereof conveyed by deed dated November 22. 1917; in Book 188. Pale 449 0 Deeds to Nicholas F. Schlicht. M910M, 4r \p7l LVI lk� CP ,- un- 'a m Y,9 Hipli sz� Ll 0 .le IV APPENDIX G Attachment 5 ♦ t ♦ i t Y • t • t u o E c c C :p� i q `' � ? 7� u .0 � tai ' C � C � .�'i c d � a ` n ` d `�' C �� - =• j � � 0 nts d/07 :� U ZZ 0-0 ;ooois .143 `z E E :V Z'ti C u O `oOco � r � F` H x > �L' V a � °C c 0 a yuC n O O V °9m �_ n u p p ` F 0 2 : O i Z uLao` _C •. E_ .c_ m oc OEw � JaEc ✓mac tz c `- - vou3 = u - « o „ � u , o _ E' Y � aoe � K0 Cc � li ° u � °a �Fv O o o E L 2 > a v — a > o 3 s 'R n C e ? n C 9 n E5 S1nwUf- 6 '3 u. wOF > (� a6waamm ^,vl V .-•,�n Ua '3 wUin � 3° (70CxoC Y ^ N M`P v�V� I- W P O � N M•0' V.� n GD O. O .. N M u'1 t0 r,: CT O N M`P N� n 00 C\ O •-• N w ^ � � -� N N N N N N N N nl M +^. M M et•, M M M M M.P `P c All n S � Z W Otr. 0 / R W J rx L3r H Z LU W W Q / e p Q W0� 3 $ i r qy. i� fii S 4 RECEIVED DEC i ,' ;C�9 Alta - DI G STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN,Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ;_ 'S , DEPARTMENT OF PARIC! AND RECREATION �`— FDSf OFFICE !O% 942896 /Commission cember }, 1991 SACRAMENTO, CAUFORNIA,,4289&0001(916)44=.-8006 Cit.)r Tanager(,itv )f San Luts Obispoe attached list p.0. 3oox 110 Sari L Lia Obispc;, California 93401.-810The above property will be considered by the State Historical omination to the National Register of Historic Places The National Register is the Federal Government's official list of historic buildings and other cultural •esources, worthy of preservation. Listing in/the National Register provides recognition and assists in preserving our Nation's.heritage. Enclosed is a copy of the criteria under whiclf properties are evaluated. Listing in the 14ational Register provides the following b n fits to historic properties: —Consideration in the planning for federally asssisted projects. Section106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provides that the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation be given an opportunity to comment on projects affecting such properties. —Eligibility for Federal .ax benefits. If/Ormperty is individually listed in the National Register,or determined a contributing structure within a Nation�t Register district, certain tax provisions may apply. The Tax Treatment Extension Act of 1980 includes prow}cions regarding charitable contributions for conservation purposes of partial interests in historically important farad areas or structures,including archeological sites and private residences.The Tax Refom Act of 1986 contains/provisions intended to encourage preservation of depreciable historic structures by allowinc favorable Federal tax provisions for rehabilitation. Beginning January 1, 1981,the Tax Reform Act of 1986 replaces the rehabilitation tax incentives available under prior law with a 20%investment tax credit for rehabilitati.ms of certain iisto/ric commercial,industrial,and residential rental buildings. —Consider.rion of hlstor�Zalues in the decision to issue a surface coal mining permit where coal is located, in accord with the Surfary ining and Control Act of 1977. —Qualificah ion forrFFe4 ral Grants for historic preservation when funds are available. Owners of pri+ate properties nominated to the National Register of Historic Places must be given an opportunity to concur in or object to listing in accord with the National Historic Preservation Act Amendments of 198-0 and Federal regulati ins 36 CFR Part 60.Any owner or partial owner of private property who chooses to object to listing is required tbmit to the State Historic Preservation Officer a notarized statement certifying that the party is the sole or partial'owner of the private property, as appropriate,and objects to the listing. For a single privately owned property w±tt one owner, the property will not be listed if the owner objects. In nominations with multiple ownership/Of a single property, the property will not be listed if a majority of the owners objects. In the case of a district 11 the district will not be list@d if a majority of the owners objects to listing.Each owner or partial owner of priv.3te property has one vote regardless of how many properties.or what part of one property that party owns/If the property or district cannot be listed because the owner or a majority of owners objects prior to su ission of a nomination by the State, the State Historic Preservation Officer shall submit the nomination to the per of the National Register for a determination of the eligibility of the property or district for inclusion in the �S- Sao Attachment 5 APPENDIX G 2 National Register. If the property is then determined eligible for listing, although not formally listed. Federal agencies will be required to allow the Advisory Council on Historic Preserva�on an opportunity to comment before the agency may Fund, license, or assist a project which will affect the propfrty.If an owner chooses to object to the listing of property, the notarized objection must be submitted to Mrs.Kathryn Gualtieri,State -iistaric Preservation Officer,Office of Historic Preservation,Post Office Box 942896,Sacramento,CA 94246-0001,fifteen(15)days before the State Historical Resources Commission considers this applicatio ✓it wilt be considered by the Commission on February 7, 1992 at 9:00 a.m. in_.Rocm 2040 in the State Capitol, Sacramento, 1 95814 _ If you wish to comment on whether the property should be ominated to the National Register, please send your comments to the above address. Comments must bereceived before the State Historical Resources Commission considers this nomination.A copy of the application has n included for your review. Sincerely, Kathryn Guaitieri State Historic Preservation Officer Enclosure DPR 5488 (Rev.3/87) t Local Government— Individual 1 `tachmen APPENDIX G State Historical F_�.oux ce C=mission Felui�xy, 1992 NEW APPLI=CNS: tSan Dieq W.W. Dztam Rause Heilman ii92118 las (Babco k Court) 2280 DurlanrDayton ]'toad Se Steet and Orange Avenue Durham 5.5538 Calavera.c Oounty: %M/tuis Obispo: Honigsbezgir Store Roost Jack Residenoe GG5 Main 5'treer- 36 Marsh Strut Copperopclis 95228 San Luis Obispo 93401 Reed's Stare 679 Main Street Santa Cruz (lain : Grope lis 952:8 Bayview Hotel 8041 SaCpal rxive Contra-Ocst.a Qg mtV: Aptos 95003 Alvarado Park Davenport Jail Marin am. Park Avenues 1 center street RiCh=nd 94806 Davenport 95107 Los Ancle g CXnz .1 Garfield Park Branch Library 705 Woodrow Avenue Diamond 1partmentss Santa Cruz 95060 321 DiamraY3 Street Redondo leach 90277 Veterans Memarial Building 842-846 Front Street Exarminer Buildizkg Santa Cruz 95060 1111 Sart q Broom y Lis Ange'-as 90}35 / Sislciyou Count Nevada Ccyzrtv.: Yreka Carie Library 412 W. Mirex' Street G ass Valley public LLbrary Yreka 96097 207 Mill -Iireet Crass Valy 9.5945 / BOCRaIARY (]-D�NGE: sacrament , Sonoma �'• Dw,_lap's Dining TAT Room Sores Plaza 432. Fourth Avenue va icy s Sai cement o 95817 Sonorra 95476 /San Benito 00m, Hollister C3rne3ie Library 375 FiftT:. Street Hollister 95023 APPENDIX H i Attachment 5 Resolution No. 615>&`(39$'7> -Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE jCITY OF SAN LUIS OBIPSPO ADOPTING HISTORICAL /ministration PROGRAM GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the City Council establisheritage Committee (CHC) as a continuing special purpose advisory body; WHEREAS, the CHC is responsible for of the city's historical preservation program; and WHEREAS, The CHC and the City Council want to establish benifit programs and provide assistance that encourages people to un ertake preservation activities; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the Historical Preservation Guidelines submitted by the CHC and has re oommended that they be adopted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ESOLVED BY the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: 1. The Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" as amended, are hereby adopted. 2. The Community,'Development Department shall publish these guidelines and make them available to the public. 3. Resolution No 6097 (1986 Series) is hereby recinded. On Motion/of/ Councilman Settle seconded by Councilwoman Dovey _ and on the following role call vote: IS: Councilmembers Settle, Dovey and Mayor Pro-Tem Griffin None NT: Councilmember Rappa and Mayor Dunin R 615,k APPENDIX Attachment 5 Resolution No. 6158(4987;.:S.2Fies) / Page 2 the foregoing reso as passed and adop d this rIdayof February 1987. / Mayor Pro—Te*BRdsbert E ri fin ATTEST: Eily Clerk Pamela Vogt APPROVED: i City Administrative Officer City Atto ey Community Development Director Attachment 6 Updated Historic Preservation Pro ram Guidelines — Comparison Table Current Historic Preservation Program Draft Update to Historic Preservation Guidelines Program Guidelines 2010 A Why Historic Preservation Chapter 1 Takes brief version in existing Guidelines and Includes brief mention of Mission founding in expands into three sections: 1772 and value of historic buildings. 1.1 Foreward References preservation program, why it is References guidelines in context of state and important, and indicates that program is federal regulations. Mentions seven member administered by an eleven-member group CHC role and role of historic preservation as called the CHC. economic development and key factor in "sense of place". 1.2 Our Town—San Luis Obispo Provides brief history of settlement of San Luis Obispo to set context for type of influences found in area. 1.3 Why Preserve San Luis Obispo's History- Describes value of historic buildings and character they bring to community. Describes how Guidelines help maintain living history. B What Properties are Historically Description of historic resources moved to Important 2.68.051 of the Ordinance per State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)recommendation. Describes "historical resources" and "contributing" structures. New Definition of"Master List" and Describes citizen committee action in 1981 to "Contributing" resources occurs in new survey buildings. definition section of both Guidelines (Chapter Notes 3 Historical Preservation Districts 5.5) and Ordinance (2.68.090). created in 1987. Figure shows boundaries of districts. New section added to Guidelines (Chapter 5.2) to describe Five Historic Districts in greater detail. Period of significance, typical characteristics of lot patterns and buildings are explained and "non-contributing" structures are noted. C Benefits and Services Provided by the Chapter 4 Preservation Tools and Incentives City Subsections listed below Subsections listed below (1) Rehabilitation Assistance Program— 4.1.5 Rehabilitation Tax Credits and Grants. indicates a financial assistance program developed by the City with details located in Appendix F which was never fully developed. Pagel of 3 U Attachment 6 (2) Alternative Building Code 4.1.2 Modified Development Standards and CA Building Code contains provisions for use of Historic Building Code. (3) Inspection Services Section removed—safety upgrades have been identified primarily through seismic retrofit program. (4) Local Landmark Program 4.1.9 Historic Plaque Program. (5) Preservation Library 4.1.10 Historic Library (6) Preservation Counseling Section removed—Assistance is provided by Community Development Department staff. (7) Summertime Walking Tours Section removed from'Guidelines. CHC includes items such as this as part of their two year work program. (8) Speakers Bureau Section removed from Guidelines. CHC includes items such as this as part of their two year work program. D Principles of Historic Preservation Chapter-3 Treatment of Historic Resources Subsections listed below Subsections listed below (1) Changes to the Exterior of Historic 3.1.4 Additions Buildings 3.4 Changes to Historic Resources Expanded sections discuss concept of compatibility, and provide graphics that illustrate examples of massing and scale and infill in historic districts. (2) New Construction Projects 3.1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with.Historic Resources Secretary of the Interior's Standards Section removed—Secretary of the Interior Only standards that apply to rehabilitation are Standards are referenced but not included. listed. Other approaches (preservation, restoration, and reconstruction) are not included. (3) Demolishing Historic Buildings 3.6 Demolition of Historic Resources— expands discussion to define what constitutes a demolition; demolition timing; and documentation required. Page 2 of 3 C, Attachment 6 E Historic Preservation and Architectural Section removed from Guidelines and moved Review to Draft Ordinance under 2.68.040: Actions Subject to CHC Review; and 2.68.050`. Cultural Heritage Review Procedures in response to direction from SHPO. Appendix A City Council Resolutions 6157 Intent of program and Role and Duties of CHC and 6593 moved to 2.68.011 through 2.68.040 of the Draft Ordinance in response to SHPO direction. Appendix B Master List of Historical 5.4 Master List of Historic Resources— Resources updated for current listing of Master list properties. Appendix C Procedures for adding Moved to 2.68.053 of the Ordinance in properties to the Master List of Historic response to SHPO direction. Resources Appendix D Contributing Properties List 5.3 Contributing List of Historic Resources— updated for current listing of Contributing properties Appendix E Procedures for amending or Moved to 2.68.055 and 2.68.056 of the establishing Historical Preservation Ordinance per SHPO direction. Districts Appendix.F Historical Preservation Zone Section removed—covered in Chapter 17.54 of the Zoning Code. Appendix G National Register of Historic Section removed—Resources listed under Places Information 5.6 Works Cited and Information Links. Registration forms for Jack House Appendix H Council Resolution 6158 5.7 Council Resolution—will replace 6158 when updated Guidelines are adopted. Page 3 of 3 P (45 � Attachment 7 RESOLUTION NO. (2010 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADOPTING UPDATED HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES (GPI 72-09) WHEREAS, in February 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6158 establishing Historical Preservation Program Guidelines in order to promote preservation of historic buildings and sites and maintain our community's heritage; and WHEREAS, the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines were amended by City Council resolution No. 6857 in August 1990 but have not been updated since that time; and WHEREAS, program 3.6.3 of the.Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan specifies that the Cultural Heritage Committee and Architectural Review Commission will provide specific guidance on the construction of new buildings within historic districts; and WHEREAS, program 3.6.10 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan indicates that the City will implement recommendations of the Cultural Heritage Committee's "whitepaper'; and WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee prepared the Updated Draft Guidelines based on General Plan policies and public input received at nine public hearings; and WHEREAS, at its June 28, 2010 meeting the Cultural Heritage Committee endorsed the June 2010 Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (GPI 72-09) WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation and the Community Development Deputy Director's determination that adoption of updated Historic Preservation Program Guidelines is categorically exempt from environmental review because it consists of an action by a regulatory agency, as authorized by state or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows/or that (whatever action is needed): SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. Council concurs with the Director's determination that the proposed Historic Preservation Program Guidelines update is Categorically Exempt from environmental review (Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). It consists of an action by a regulatory agency as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment. SECTION 2. Guidelines Approval. The updated Historic Preservation Program Guidelines are hereby approved as recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee. Upon motion of , seconded by , R Attachment 7 Resolution No. (2010 Series) Page 2 and on the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: The foregoing resolution was adopted this day of 2010. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST`. Elaina Cano 'City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FO 9it,y is me Dietrick Attorney ��� � LI Attachment 7 city Of A San US OBISPO A'W A- histoRic p pizopizam qui6El.ines rU_ W r Cerro San Luis (left), Bishop's Peak and the Town of San Luis Obispo, 1892 chc &Aft - ju.nC 2010 City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Arstoric Preservation Program Guidelines A�'tcclrment 7 June 2010 City of San Luis Obispo histoizic p2csEuvation pnocuam cui6elines Adopted by City Council Resolution No (2010 Series) SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL Dave Romero, Mayor John Ashbaugh Jan Howell Marx Andrew Carter Allen Settle,Vice Mayor CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE Dan Carpenter, Chairperson Barbara Breska Buzz Kalkowski Hemalata Dandekar Dean Miller Katy Davis Jeff Oliveira City Administration Katie Licthtig, City Manager Shelly Stanwyck, Assistant City Manager Brigitte Elke, Administrative Analyst Community Development Department John Mandeville, Community Development Director Kim Murry, Deputy Director for Long Range Planning Tim Girvin, Chief Building Official Jeff Hook, Senior Planner Mary Phillips, Planning Intern Amber Piona, Planning Intern Architectural Graphics by Craig Smith City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 - 1 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Attachment 7 taBte of contents Page Chapter1: Introduction............................................................................................... 1.1 Foreword ................................................................................................................ 1.2 Our Town—San Luis Obispo.................................................................................... 1.3 Why Preserve San Luis Obispo's History?................................................................ Chapter 2: Historic Preservation Program................................................................ 2.1 How to Use These Guidelines.................................................................................... 2.2 Cultural Heritage Committee..................................................................................... 2.3 Cultural Heritage Committee Duties ......................................................................... 2.4 Community Development Director Role................................................................... 2.5 Related Standards and Policies.................................................................................. Chapter 3: Treatment of Historic Resources............................................................. 3.1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with Historic Resources.......... 3.2 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts............................................................ 3.3 Other Cultural Resources........................................................................................... 3.4 Changes to Historic Resources .................................................................................. 3.5 Reconstruction of Historic Resources........................................................................ 3.6 Demolition of Historic Resources.............................................................................. 3.7 Relocation of Historic Resources............................................................................... Chapter 4: Preservation Tools and Incentives........................................................... 4.1 Cultural Resource Preservation and Incentive Programs........................................... Chapter5: Appendices...............................»..............»................................................ 5.1 Historic Architectural Styles of San Luis Obispo................................................... 5.1.5 Architectural Style Sketchbook.............................................................................. 5.2 Historic District Descriptions................................................................................. 5.3 Contributing List of Historic Resources................................................................. 5.4 Master List of Historic Resources................................................................ 5.5 Definitions............................................................................................................... 5.6 Works Cited and Information Links....................................................................... 5.7 Council Resolution.................................................................................................. FIGURES 3.1.1.New Development in Historic Districts................................................................. 3.1.2. Massing of New Development in Historic Districts.................................... 3.1.3. Infill Construction in Historic Districts, Overview.................................... 3.1.4. In-fill Construction in Historic Districts, Detailed..................................... 3.1.5 Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo..................................................... 3.4.1 Additions to Historic Resources........................................................... 5.2.1 Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo.................................................... - 2 - F+ � - 13 -,1- City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines ,attachment 7 June 2010 Higuera at Marsh Street, looking northeast, ca. 1920s - 3 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines iyr:r c ,T; CF,t 7 June 2010 chapt(m is mtwb ction 1.1 ]Foreword These guidelines were developed by the City of San Luis Obispo's Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC), a group of seven citizens appointed by the City Council to advise and educate the public and decision makers on historic resource preservation. Historic resources include buildings and other structures, sites, landscapes, and other features that are significant in San Luis Obispo's history. Interest in historic preservation arises out of the community's desire to explain our past and serve as guideposts to the future. Federal, state and local governments have passed laws to protect historic properties that enjoy special merit based on age, architectural style, period, architect, owners or occupants and/or materials used. These guidelines reference those laws, but are sensitive to our community's special heritage as a California Mission community. As an advisory committee to the City Council, the CHC reviews development proposals to determine their effect on the City's historic districts. These guidelines apply to both private and public properties that either have or are considered to be historic resources. The maintenance and preservation of historic sites, structures, and objects is important to the community, and is a key factor in the City's popularity with tourists and in San Luis Obispo's strong "sense of place." To that end, we are all stewards in the preservation and upkeep of our community's rich heritage. From Terrace Hill, looking toward Chorro Valley, with Santa Rosa Street at the left, ca. 1890. -4- City of San Luis Obispo-Draft hrstoric Preservation Program Guidelinesr1..L ,.Lu..� June 2010 1.2 Our Town — San Luis Obispo Native Americans inhabited California's central coast, including the San Luis Obispo area, as early as 10,000 years B.C. Chumash and Salinan tribes benefitted from the region's mild climate, abundant resources and natural beauty. As a result, the Santa Barbara-San Luis Obispo region supported one of the most densely populated areas of pre-historic California. In the mid- 16`h century, Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo landed on the central coast in what was later to become Santa Barbara County, and began a period of dramatic change coinciding with the arrival of Europeans. By the late 18'b century, San Luis Obispo had become one of 21 communities in California founded by Franciscan missionaries. The Franciscans came to convert the Native Americans to Christianity and to strengthen Spain's control over Alta California. The mission church became the catalyst for the town's continued development; its plaza was a gathering place for work, trade and festivities. Around the mission, Chumash Indians built tule huts over willow frames while the first soldier-settlers and craftspeople constructed small adobe houses. Each group built structures in keeping with their particular cultural background and drawing from materials immediately at hand. The transition of California from Indian to Spanish to Mexican to American control also brought many changes in construction methods, architectural styles and uses of materials. Many of these cultural periods are still represented in San Luis Obispo's architectural heritage. As the early community grew, people from around the globe brought their culture, skills and ways of life. Consequently, San Luis Obispo's diversity in architectural styles and heritage reflects that diversity and enhances our quality of life. �. i. •_�� t Ly4 .••tea N���'h- ' I s � 4 Southern Pacific Railroad "Daylight"locomotive on the outskirts of San Luis Obispo, 1937 - 5 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines -- Attachment 7 June 2010 1.3 Why Preserve San Luis Obispo's History? The Town of San Luis Obispo began with the founding of the Old Mission in 1772. Over the past two centuries the community has experienced many changes. These changes can be appreciated because many of the older building and historic sites are still present. One has only to visit the central business district or wander through surrounding residential areas to imagine what is must have been like before the introduction of automobiles, flat screen television and computers. San Luis Obispo is blessed with original historic buildings and distinctive historic districts that many communities envy. Historic resources lend a sense of permanence and continuity; however, in some respects they are also fragile and vulnerable. The values and character they impart can easily be lost through neglect, demolition and inappropriate remodeling. Historic features have community benefits beyond their aesthetic qualities and educational value. San Luis Obispo's historic sites, buildings and other aspects of our "living history" are irreplaceable resources. They are important to the community's economic vitality, quality of life, and unique sense of place. As such, they merit protection from deterioration, damage, and inappropriate alteration or demolition. To promote understanding and an appreciation of its history, San Luis Obispo citizens have established these Historic Preservation Program Guidelines (hereafter "Guidelines"). By working with property owners, developers, neighborhood and civic groups and citizens, the community intends to preserve the most\`important hist oric;,and architecturally significant buildings and sites. a These Guidelines are administered by a seven-member citizens' group appointed by the City Council called the'Cultural.Heritage Committee`("CHC"). The duties of the CHC are further described in these Guidelines. The Committee, is"assisted by staff in the San Luis Obispo Community Development Department ("the.Department"). To contact the CHC or for more information, visit the, Department at 919 Palm Street in San Luis Obispo, or contact the Department at (805) 781=.7170, or www.slocity.org. - 6 - ���' 1.3 C, City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — Attachment 7 June 2010 chaptCR 2: histowc pReseRvation paocuam 2.1 How to Use These Guidelines Historic preservation starts during the early stages of project planning and design. Property owners, developers, builders, design professionals and others involved in public or private development can use these guidelines to anticipate concerns and to design their projects to protect important historic resources and avoid delays during development review and construction. Highlights of where to find information in this document are listed below: a) To determine whether a property is currently listed on either the Contributing or Master List of Historic Resources see Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of the Appendices. To see if a property is located within a Historic District see Figure 3.1. b) For an explanation of treatment of Historic Properties, including construction in Historic Districts and on properties with listed Historic Resources; information on what is required in a historic preservation report; and requirements associated with the demolition or relocation of listed historic resources see Section 3.1-3.8. c) For an overview of historic preservation tools-and incentives offered by the City see Section 4.1: d) For information about the historic architectural;styles of structures found in San Luis Obispo or the predominant character-of the historic disiricis, see Sections 5.1 and 5.2. 2.2 Cultural Heritage C om mittee Originally ,esfAhshed_,by Council resolution in 1981, the Cultural Heritage Committee ("Committee', or "CHC") consists of seven citizens appointed by the City Council and represents the citizens of San Luis Obispo. The CHC advises property owners, developers, design'professionals, City,staff and, decision makers on ways to preserve the community's significant,historic and archaeological resources. The Committee's purpose and duties are established by ordinance (SLOMC ). The purpose of these\guidelines is to implement the City's historic preservation ordinance and to promote the public welfare through the identification, protection, enhancement and preservation of those properties, structures, sites, artifacts and other cultural resources representing the distinctive elements of San Luis Obispo's cultural, educational, social, economic, political and architectural history. Under the Municipal Code, the Committee is charged with the responsibilities to: a) Identify, protect, preserve, and promote the continuing use and upkeep of San Luis Obispo's historic structures, sites and districts. - 7 - ptt5 - [3� City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines AI:aC! ;m ori l 7 June 2010 b) Foster the retention and restoration of historic buildings and other cultural resources that promote tourism, economic vitality, sense of place, and diversity. c) Encourage private stewardship of historic buildings and other cultural resources through incentives where possible. d) Implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. e) Promote the conservation of valuable material and embodied energy in historic structures through their continued use, restoration and repair, and on-going maintenance of historic resources. f) Promote the knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City's distinctive character, cultural resources and history. g) Establish the procedures and significance criteria to be applied when evaluating development project effects on historic resources. H. Fulfill the City's responsibilities as a Certified Local Government under State and Federal regulations and for Federal Section 106 reviews. 2.3 Cultural Heritage Committee Duties The CHC's duties are to: a) Establish and maintain historic and cultural resource preservation standards and guidelines for the use by persons planning development projects subject to Cultural Heritage Committee review, and for guiding City and property owner decisions regarding cultural resources in San Luis Obispo. b) Identify and recommend to the Council those properties, areas, sites, buildings, structures or other features having significant historical, cultural, architectural, community, scientific or aesthetic value to the citizens of San Luis Obispo. c) Maintain and update the Master and Contributing Properties Lists of Historic Resources, and Historic Property and Archaeological Site Inventories. d) Review and make recommendations to decision makers on actions that may affect significant archaeological, cultural or historic resources. e) Advise and assist property owners, developers and staff in the application of architectural, historic and cultural preservation standards and guidelines to projects and approvals involving historic sites, districts and structures. 138 8 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Frnsioric Preservation Program Guidelines 1�1`iaCh17leClt 7 June 2010 fl Collect and consolidate information about cultural resources and promote, participate in, or sponsor educational and interpretive programs which foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources. g) Provide advice and guidance on the restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping and maintenance of listed resources, and properties within historic preservation districts. h) Administer incentive programs approved by the Council that are directed at preserving and maintaining cultural resources. i) Assist property owners with the preparation of local, state and federal historic nominations to enable property owners to utilize preservation incentives, including the Mills Act and federal tax incentives such as rehabilitation tax credits. j) Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Body Handbook and perform other duties as assigned by Council. 2.4 Community Development Director Role The CHC is assisted by staff of the Community Development Department. The Community Development Director ('Director") is responsible ,for interpreting and implementing these Guidelines and helping the CHC carry out its duties: Notwithstanding Section 2.3 of these Guidelines, the Director may determine that CHC review is'not"required for actions or projects that: 1) do not adversely affect-historic resources,'or 2) are:consistent with these guidelines and no public purpose would.Iiel served by requiring CHC review`. 2.5 Related Standards and Policies Historic preservation is,one of many community goals in the General Plan. It is part of the community's core values and identity. Preservation embodies the fundamental belief that sustainable, successful communities are those that respect, preserve and celebrate their history and`unique character. To,help ensure these valuable and finite resources will continue to enhance the lives of San Luis Obispo generations to come, the City Council has adopted several documents, in addition to these;Guidelines, that help protect these resources. They include: a) General Plan;Conservation and Open Space Element, adopted by Council Resolution No. 9785 (2006 Series) — Establishes citywide policies and programs regarding identification and treatment of cultural resources. b) Historic Preservation Ordinance, San Luis Obispo Municipal Code XXX — Establishes the CHC, its duties and describes procedures, historic listing criteria and procedures, incentives and sanctions for non-compliance. � 1r4.J.r ...n d City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 c) Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, adopted by Council Resolution No. 10120 (2009 Series) — Establishes procedures to be used for the protection of sub-surface cultural resources, both historic and pre-historic features. d) Community Design Guidelines, adopted by Council Resolution No. 9391 (2002 Series) — Establishes site and architectural design standards for development projects, including projects involving historic resources and historic districts, and demolitions. e) Demolition and Moving of Buildings — Appendix Chapter 2, Chapter 201 General, San Luis Obispo Municipal Code — Establishes procedures and requirements for the relocation or demolition of historic buildings. f) San Luis Obispo Zoning Regulations, Chapter 17.54 — Establishes the Historical Preservation Overlay Zone (H) and describes its purposes and application, allowed uses and property development standards. These documents are available at the Department, or on the City's website at www.slocity.org. r Historic district,Johnson Avenue between Palm and Mill Streets - 10 - -P R5 l � City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — Attachment 7 June 2010 D. ���-`�Y �dil • � � ' `1 "s v`"# ��. San Luis Obispo ca. 1890 looking northwest to Chorro Valley from Terrace Hill _ 11 _ Attachment 7 City of San Luis Obispo-Draft lirsioric Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 chaptER 3: twatment of hlstoRic ResouRces 3.1 Construction in Historic Districts and on Properties with Historic Resources 3.1.1 Conformance with design standards. Construction in historic districts and on properties that contain listed historic resources shall conform with the goals and policies of the General Plan, these Guidelines, the Community Design Guidelines, any applicable specific or area plan, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 3.1.2 Architecturally compatible development. New structures in historic districts shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the district's prevailing historic character as measured by their consistency with the scale, massing, rhythm; signature architectural elements, exterior materials, siting and street yard setbacks of the district's'historic structures, as described M figures 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. New structures shall not copy or imitate historic structures, or seek to create the illusion that a new building is historic. Figure 3.1.1- New Development in Historic Mstricis MVrnr, Mn-56,fVft+M ANo Pa6,0 WMMNWt 5 VON KBLh1H TO TI{L _ LJ' 1011 ,Hf91DN Co.L CLEM6NT5 oC __ ' lH£ N816H00FFf4:D. .. GILDING MnSs EOtN1,wn VOROM comroNeNr�s F��To ex�enr� . . __ NtemFN:nL STRIGt`Uf95 _ — a II.t11NG M1MYi,FDFM AND peflM _ GOMfbNBMP" FeA;NM'N C%15TNG HI51DKlCAL 9fFLCR1R85 e .. _ 4%� Emil MASE.FORM NiP ves�eN COMra+ecir Reu+naasxir5 ��� � I - 12 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft htstoric Preservation Program Guidelines µ'C'' Ant 7 June 2010 Figure 3.1.2- Massing of New Development in Historic Districts HEW gmLCrVF0 PILLS IN mm%ENI5 .. FRcw. FEhNRES r--{C/A�F�Y('e{PITCH ( 1 IN tFK'iLKIG NlIVF V:M 5(9�11' f /r Af m/oNof- aI1-R,f NE i EiR+iGbf� � I i r- --S"T PMf4!NGr eomrA 181-E —_ cAFJGT1ia�. _ 'Vi EXI57lNv Dr�IPJt:f P� ,D4 51F�P7-t 1.of.Yci �" Wr T W/ V IT —. A&A661NO OF .6TR CTURe 3.13 Accessory structures. New accessory structures shall complement the primary structure's historic character through-compatibility with its form, massing, color, and materials. 3.1.4 Additions. Additions to listed historic structures shall maintain the structure's original architectural integrity and shall-;closely match the building's original architecture, or match additions that-have-achieved historic significance in their own right, in terms of scale, form, massing, rhythm, fenestration,materials, color and architectural details. 3.1.5 Review-,of development projects in Historic Districts. The Director shall refer a development project application for a property located within a historic district to the CHC for review, unless the Director determines the project is: (a) Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and (b) Of such mini'or incidental nature that it would have no effect on Historic or Archaeological Resources, and (c) Consistent with the General Plan and these Guidelines. 3.1.6 Architectural compatibility. The CHC shall review development in historic districts for architectural compatibility with nearby historic resources, and for consistency with applicable design and preservation policies, standards, and historic district descriptions in Section 5.2. New development shall not sharply contrast with, significantly block public views of, or visually - 13 - P � "1 City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 detract from, the historic architectural character of historically designated structures located adjacent to the property to be developed, or detract from the prevailing historic architectural character of the historic district. Figure 3.1.3- Commercial In-fill in Historic Districts, Overview Colwtn�C tAl. dN-Flu. GOIfTEXN(thL. Ve-61" n aNAVR-CI AI. IN-rl u, aNTEMPOMFY Pft-*1 - 14 - R15 - � f City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines - Attachment 7 June 2010 Figure 3.1.4- Commercial In-fill in Historic Districts, Detailed 5*l glgo NEW IN-hU- vTFu-;NFF -. ffV?0f76ML_ V6RTIGAI- RF,L/r�'E'v 'ID EXk:%Ilf�- -- - IkO(cI�BNThL AUGNMfNT. OF NLS! rAcAOC R1.ym-F Tt7e.X67t* -WMA AAD 6aL a OF ' FWOtrrf0NAL- VElFTICAL Rffieof- TD _ EXI�fC1NG ETiTItT e0c(16 LOCATION _ AND NoroFpo� 1� TO EM5TING P06iN.EP�trtL IN-RU, tib ff15i�tG t�15TR/c7 -_ (LoNT'(rXNftAI. DEFIGN� - EXI�ilNG NetU IN-fll..r, 5I�-t�7'vr« — VPPEtZ LE.YEI� 6feP 6kG� from �rFEET �Jt�PP84� PlsEAPET' IEll .._El... "IV Lf .l hJ�S'(iIOFQfJFTAV it WNMZKF Of Y V Fh_40e ReLhlw PO I}tM AND �ALE OF NOW W{MDDwS RELkTES .. "ta EXIc✓t'IMC� ' � i�IT¢Y`(AGING IACh-T10N -1�-1 GOhtk�PC'(A� ►N�FIu. i!J l}t�1'otztG DtSff�iGT' �LOFtTE'lKPOnh>K �i1� - 15 - � City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Figure 3.1.5 - Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo, 2010 city of san Luis osispo histonic 01stizicts Mai Street aln 'Al Downtown ,c '• • o Old Town Raltroa 0 0175 015 0.5 � v Was 3.1.7 Approval conditions. The CHC may recommend conditions or environmental mitigation measures for construction in historic districts or on properties that contain listed historic resources. The Director, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council may impose conditions of approval and or environmental mitigation measure for planning actions affecting Historic and Archaeological Resources. . 3.1.8 Environmental review. Development projects on properties that contain listed historic resources, and on properties located within historic districts shall be considered environmentally - 16 - f H.5-/V& City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines A"LLachment 7 June 2010 sensitive pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and require at a minimum, an initial study to evaluate the project's potential effects on the resource except where the Director determines the project: (a) does not involve: 1) a significant change to the exterior (or interior, subject to Section 3.4.6) of a historic structure, 2) relocation or demolition of part or all of a historic or potentially historic structure, 3) or grading on a listed historic property or identified archaeological site; or (b) is minor or incidental and have no potential to adversely affect cultural resources. 3.2 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts 3.2.1 Historic Resources outside Historic Districts. Listed Historic Resources located outside of historic districts.shall be subject to the same protection and regulations applicable to historic resources within historic districts. 3.3 Other Cultural Resources 3.3.1 Historic signs. A sign which contributes to the unique architectural or historic character of a building, site or historic district may be designated as a historic sign.and added to the Inventory of Historic Resources. The Director or the ARCmay exempt historic signs from complying with the Sign Regulations (SLOMC Ch. 15.40). `Such designation 'shall be subject to the same nomination procedures as-Contributing and Master List historic properties, and must meet at least one of the following criteria: (a) The sign is exemplary of technology, craftsmanship or design of the period when it was constructed, uses historic sign materials and means of illumination, and is not significantly altered from its historic period. Historic sign materials shall include metal or wood facings, or paint directly on the faeade of,a building. Historic means of illumination shall include incandescent light fixtures or neon tubing on the exterior of the sign. If the sign has been altered, it must be restorable to its historic function and appearance.. (b) The sign is well integrated with the site and/or architecture of the building. (c) A sign not meeting either criterion may be considered for inclusion in the inventory if it demonstrates extraordinary aesthetic quality, creativity, or innovation. 3.4 Changes to Historic Resources. Projects involving an alteration or relocation of a listed historic resource or alteration to an historic district shall require CHC review, as described below: 3.4.1 CHC review. The CHC shall review and make recommendations, including plan revisions and conditions to proposed alterations to primary buildings in historic districts. Such changes to historically or architecturally significant buildings or other cultural resources shall be consistent - 17 - 7 5 -N City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 with these guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings, goals and policies of the General Plan, the Historic Preservation Ordinance, the Community Design Guidelines and any applicable specific or area plan. The CHC shall recommend final action to the appropriate approval body, including recommended plan revisions, findings and conditions to achieve the intent of these guidelines. 3.4.2 Alterations to Historic Resources. (a) Application. An application to alter or repair listed historic resources shall be made on forms provided by the Department, including applicable fees and any supplemental information as required to explain the request. (b) Minor repairs or alterations. For minor repairs or alterations to listed historic resources, the Director may approve upon making the finding that the proposed work is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and these Guidelines. If this finding cannot be made, the Director shall,refer the matter to the CHC for review and comment. (c) Historic preservation report required. For minor repairs or alterations to listed historic resources where the director cannot make the finding in Section 3.4.2 (b) and for all other types of alterations of or repairs to listed historic, resources, the Director shall require a historic preservation report at the applicant's cost. The CHC,shall review the application and the historic preservation report and shall approve the application;only upon.finding that the proposed work is consistent with the approved historic preservation report,'.General Plan policies, the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 'The Director may determine that a historic preservation report is not required for minor alterations to a listed historic resource for which CHC review is desired where information isavailableto support review of the proposed project. Report content. A historic preservation report shall require CHC approval. The report shall be prepared by a qualified'professiorial and shall be based on these guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties and shall include the following: (1) Which of the four .Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties is,being proposed for the resource. (2) The historic context, period of significance and character-defining features. (3) An architectural history of the resource which includes: *Photographs and drawings which identify the original building, structure, object, and site configuration, -Character defining features of the resource as originally constructed, City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — Attachment 7 June 2010 .Alterations, including those alterations made over time that have achieved status as character defining features, even though not a part of the original resource, and -Alterations not consistent with maintaining the historic integrity of the resource. (4) A program for repair, rehabilitation and preservation of the resource, including a statement of how the proposed program meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties. t 3.4.3 Percent of historic resource to be preserved. /! Remodels of historically-listed buildings shall retain at least '``�; � 75% of the original building framework, roof, and exterior bearing walls and cladding, in total, and reuseoriginal materials to the maximum extent possible. Proposed , � alterations of greater than 25% of the original building framework, roof, and exterior walls shall be considered a demolition and subject to regulation and review as such. 3.4.4 Retention of character-defining features. Remodels of historically-listed buildings shall retain character defining Y features and new features on primary and secondary ?' building facades, or features visible from a public area, shall be completed in a manner that preserves the original 4 architectural character; form, scale, and appearance of the building. Rehabilitation of the historic Righetti House, 2007 3.4.5 Exteriorbuilding changes. Exterior changes to historically-listed buildings or resources shall not introduce new or conflicting architectural elements and shall be architecturally compatible with the original and/or prevailing architectural character of the building, its setting and architectural context. Additions to historic buildings shall, comply with the Secretary of the Interior's standards to complement and be consistent with the original style of the structure. Building materials used to replicate character-definirg features shall match the original materials in terms of size, shape, quality and appearance. - 19 - =/�� City of San Luis Obispo-Draft ltrs"toric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Figure 3.4.1- Additions in Historic Districts /,aTgUN � �mtt.Af�. . -Ar�fhttok �6 ou ='kI.E� �iNC7 al 'E'-t "f0 '?LYJ 6tc��"f0 EXI:i'fIN(a EXlf7RN!i SfR��MtzE`� ✓(KW UREA u 51it11LftR- 5ch1.6 AR�f11UN UUf-.OF-�-JC+ALE hDVITfgV WOO NG Of A NEW AVOMiM (N A^:f161V IGAL. NEIQ+R; R,JWQ 3.4.6 Interior building changes. Interior changes to listed historic buildings whose architectural or historic significance is wholly or,partially based on interior architectural characters or features shall preserve and restore significant interior architectural features. 3.4.7 Acquired historic significance. Changes,to listed historic resources that the Director or the CHC determine"s-to have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 3.5 Reconstruction of Historic Resource"s 3.5.1 Historic. building codes. Reconstruction of listed historic structures shall preserve the original historic.character of the historic resource to the maximum extent possible; use of historic building codes is encouraged to accomplish such preservation: 3.5.2 Consistency-with Standards. Reconstruction shall follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, and shall be based on conclusive evidence such as architectural plans, photos, as-built drawings and other reliable-and accurate information. 3.5.3 Minor variations. The Director or the ARC, on recommendation by the CHC, may approve minor variations from the original design to meet code requirements; provided the overall architectural character is maintained and character defining features are accurately recreated. -20 - �G► �'�� City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines J Attac"meat 7 June 2010 3.6 Demolition of Historic Resources 3.6.1 Intent. It is the intent of the City that listed historic resources are an irreplaceable community resource that merit special protection to preserve them for future generations, and shall not be demolished unless Council makes all of the findings listed under Section 3.6.4. 3.6.2 Demolition review. The CHC shall review and make recommendation to the Director, ARC or City Council concerning demolition applications for structures listed in the Inventory of Historic resources. 3.6.3 Demolition thresholds. Demolition permits for structures which are included on the Inventory of Historic resources shall be required for: (a) Alterations to the resource involving greater than 25%of the original building framework, roof, and exterior walls; and (b) Removal of greater than 25%of any building's framework, roof, and exterior walls; and (c) Relocation of such resources to a site outside the city limits. These thresholds shall not apply to repairs to listed historic resources when the CHC or the Director determines such work is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and with these guidelines. 3.6.4 Required findings for demolition of a historic resource. The City Council shall approve an application for demolition of a structure listed in the Inventory of Historic Resources only if Council determines that: (a) The historic resource is a hazard to public health or safety, and repairs or stabilization is not structurally feasible. Deterioration resulting from the property owner's neglect or failure to maintain the property should not be a justification for demolition. The applicant may be required to provide structural reports, to the approval of the Community Development Director or City Council, to document that repairs or stabilization are not feasible; and (b) The proposed demolition is consistent with the General Plan; and (c) Denial of the application will deprive the property owner of all economically viable use of the property, after application of financial, land use and other incentives available to the property. 3.6.5 Demolition timing. City regulations provide for a 90-day waiting period before demolition of a listed historic resource to allow consideration of alternatives to preserve the building through relocation and/or property trades. The Chief Building Official shall not issue a permit for demolishing a historic resource until: a) public notice requirements in the City's City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Demolition and Building Relocation Code have been met, b) a construction permit is issued for a replacement building, and c) all permit fees for the new development are paid. Where no new development is proposed, the property owner shall provide to the Director's satisfaction, financial guarantees to ensure demolition plans and conditions of approval are implemented. 3.6.55 Exceptions. In the event that a listed historic resource may pose an imminent demonstrable threat to human life and safety, the Chief Building Official may disregard the 90- day waiting period and issue a permit for demolition. 3.6.6 Historic and architectural documentation. Before the issuance of a demolition permit for structures listed in the Inventory of Historic Resources, the resource and its site shall be documented as specified in City standards, to the satisfaction of the CHC and the Director. The documentation shall be retained in a secure but publicly accessible location. 3.6.7 Historic acknowledgement. An acknowledgment of demolished resources shall be provided through historic signage and/or the reuse'or display of historic materials and artifacts on site, at the owner's expense, to the Director's approval. 3.6.8 Code requirements. Demolitions shall follow standards and procedures in the Demolition and Building Relocation Code and California Building Code as locally amended. 3.6.9 Expiration of demolition approval. Demolition approval of a listed historic resource shall expire two years after its date of approval unless a building permit has been issued and construction has begun. A.one year extension may be granted by the Director. Additional time extensions shall require reapplication to, and approval by the CHC. 3.7 Relocation of Historic Resources. Relocation has the potential to adversely affect the significance of a historic resource and is discouraged,except where it is the only feasible alternative to demolition. Relocation applications shall be evaluated as the, (a) Review. The CHC and ARCH shall review applications to relocate structures listed on the Inventory of Historic Resources. (b) Criteria for 'relocation: Relocation of structures included on the Inventory of Historic Resources, or those,that are determined by the CHC or the Director to be potentially historic, is the least preferred preservation method and shall be permitted only when: (1) The relocation will not, in whole or part, change, destroy, or adversely affect the historic, architectural or aesthetic value of the resource; and (2) Preservation of the resource on site is physically infeasible, and relocation is the only feasible option to ensure the preservation of the resource, and - 22 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft lii'storic Preservation Program Guidelines 4�h P'1 n-nt 7 June 2010 (i) Relocation will not adversely affect the character of the historic district where the resource is located or at its proposed location, and (ii) The original site and the proposed receiving site are controlled through ownership long term lease or similar assurance by the person(s) proposing relocation, to the Director's approval, and (iii)The proposed receiving site is relevant to the resource's historic significance and the relocation will pose no adverse impacts to the surrounding property, and (iv)Relocation is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan, any applicable area or specific plans, and these Guidelines, or (v) The relocation is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the site and no other measures for correcting the condition are feasible. (c) Relocation timing. The historic resource shall not be relocated unless the Chief Building Official issues a permit for relocation and all permit or impact fees for new development are paid; or where no new development is proposed, an appropriate security is posted to guarantee that relocation plans are implemented, to the Director's approval. (d) Historical and architectural documentation. Prior to issuance of a construction permit for relocation, the resource and its site shall be historically documented as specified in these Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the CHC and the Director. An acknowledgment of the resource, such as a permanent, weatherproof historic plaque shall be incorporated on the resource's original site as provided by the applicant or property owner, subject to the approval of the CHC. (e) Relocation plan and procedures. Relocations shall follow a plan approved by the CHC or the Director, standards and procedures in the Demolition and Building Relocation Code, the California Building Code, and the following: (1) Application for demolition shall be made on forms provided by the Department and shall include information to respond to the criteria in Section 3.8(b). (2) The CHC shall hold a noticed public hearing and recommend action to the ARC or City Council on the application for relocation or demolition of a historic resource, and the ARC or Council shall consider the CHC's recommendation in making the final determination to approve or deny the permit. (3) The ARC or the City Council will not grant an approval for the relocation of a listed historic resource unless one of the following two findings can be made: (i) The resource is a hazard to public health or safety, and repair or stabilization is not structurally feasible. Deterioration resulting from the neglect or failure of the owner to maintain the property will not be considered a basis for - 23 - palS - 15,3 City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 making this finding. The Director may require the applicant to provide one or more structural reports to document that repair or stabilization is not feasible, and (ii) Denial of the application will deprive the property owner of all economically viable use of the property, after the application of financial, land use and other incentives available to the property. i P t' • � 1 iia S', "�-• Obispo Theater,Monterey at Court Street, demolished in 1976 after afire - 24- City of San Luis Obispo-Draft lnstoric Preservation Program Guidelines 7 June 2010 chapteR 4: pReseRvation tools ana incentives 4.1 Cultural Resource Preservation Incentives and Benefit Programs The City intends to establish and maintain incentives to support and encourage the identification, preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction and continued use of historic and cultural resources. The City Council may offer these or additional preservation incentives to property owners of listed historic resources, as budget and/or funding sources allow: 4.1.1 Reconstruction after loss. Subject to Director approval, historic resources damaged or destroyed by fire or natural disasters may be reconstructed to match their historic appearance as existing before the damage without complying with development standards for setback, lot coverage,height, parking requirements or other Zoning Regulations. 4.1.2 Modified development standards. Property development standards in the Zoning Regulations and Parking and Driveway Standards may be relaxed by an Administrative Use Permit, following procedures set forth in SLOMC Chapter 17.58, if the modifications facilitate the preservation and/or rehabilitation of a historic resource, or serve to reduce or eliminate impacts of development to a historic resource. 4.1.3 Additional uses. The following additional uses may be allowed on Historic Properties by an Administrative Use Permit: (a) Bed and Breakfast Inns with a gross floor area not exceeding 2,500 square feet or three guest rooms in the R-2, R-3 and R-4 zones. (b) Re-establishment of the property's historic use (defined as the historic resource's original use when it opened or the use for which the resource was designed), provided the Director determines such uses are compatible with adjacent uses. (c) Any other use which is determined to be compatible with its surroundings and consistent with the General Plan, and which is logical in terms of the design, location and past use of the historic resource. 4.1.4 Use permit review. (A) To apply for a Use Permit under this Chapter, the property owner or owner's agent shall submit a planning application, fee and supporting information to the Department. The application shall include a historic preservation report, as described in these Guidelines. The CHC shall evaluate whether the proposed land use and related building modifications are consistent with these guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties conformance reasonably necessary to preserve or rehabilitate the historic resource, and shall report its findings to the Director. (B) In granting a Use Permit, the Director shall make the findings pursuant to SLOW Chapter 17.58, including these specific findings: - 25 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 (a) Impacts of the use, including traffic and parking, would not be detrimental to the surrounding area. (b) Flexible development standards and/or uses conform to an approved historic preservation report and are necessary for the preservation and/or rehabilitation of an historic resource. (c) Preservation agreements, contracts or fagade easements between the property owner and City that would provide for preservation, restoration or rehabilitation of exterior or interior features of an historic resource may be required as a condition of the Use Permit. 4.1.5 Rehabilitation tax credits and grants. Historic resources may be eligible for the State Historical Building Code, Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits, Mills Act Property Tax Reduction Program, Community Development Block Grant and other programs that may be established by state, federal, or non-profit agencies, or by the City Council. 4.1.6 Historic and fagade easements. Property owners may dedicate historic or fagade easements to the City or to a non-profit organization to preserve cultural and historic resources. Such dedication may qualify for fee waivers, rehabilitation grants, permit streamlining, Mills Act program participation or other incentives, subject to the approval of the City Council. 4.1.7 Transfer of development credit. For projects that preserve cultural or historic resources on site, the City may enter into an agreement to transfer development credit or density to another appropriate site proportional to the commercial floor area or number of dwellings possible to develop under current zoning if the resource were removed. 4.1.8 Fee waiver or reduction. A property owner may apply for the waiver or reduction of planning, building and engineering application and permit fees for designated historic resources. The City Council may waive some or all fees if it can be demonstrated that the waiver will assist in the preservation of a designated historic resource. 4.1.8 Financial assistance. With City Council approval, the City may use the Historic and Cultural Resource Preservation Trust Fund, State or Federal grants, affordable housing funds or other funding to achieve historic preservation objectives, especially for exceptional preservation projects where multiple community objectives such as affordable housing, historic preservation, removal of spot blight, or more sustainable property development can be achieved with such assistance. 4.1.9 Historic plaque program. Upon available funding, the City may provide standard historic plaques for designated historic properties and at no or reduced cost to property owners. High quality bronze historic plaques will be available to purchase through the City at manufacturer's cost plus handling. 4.1.10 Historic library. Property owners of historic properties shall have use of the CHC reference library in the Department. - 26 - �'��� Attachment 7 City of San Luis Obispo- Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 chaptCR 5: appendices 5.1 Historic Architectural Styles of San Luis Obispo Architectural Style In surveying the City's historic resources, several generalized architectural style categories have been identified to describe the architectural heritage of the City: Spanish Colonial, Victorian, Spanish Eclectic, Craftsman, Main Street or Traditional American Commercial, Period Styles, and Post-World War II. The local mixture of styles reflects the desire of early San Luis Obispo residents and business owners to emulate the architectural styles prevalent in larger urban areas in the United States — styles which were themselves influenced by historic European architectural styles. In San Luis Obispo; most American architectural styles are present in large and small versions. Some are camouflaged by out-of-character additions or'remodels others represent a combination of styles adapted to the budgets, materials, skills and des_ign'prefeiences prevalent in San Luis Obispo during the building's period of construction (vernacular design). Thus, the architectural renderings below show styles as they should look in a traditional sense, and not all architectural elements will be present in a historic building of that style. To preserve the integrity and value of historic buildings, maintenance, repairs; remodels or additions should preserve or closely match "character-defining" architectural elements of that style, and not introduce extraneous or incompatible architectural features. Spanish Colonial.or'Adobe, Spanish Colonial style adobes.were the first permanent structures in San Luis Obispo, beginning with the Mission from which the town derived its name. Construction of the Mission began in 1772, but it.was not_until,the early'19°i century that adobe buildings became common. From the 1820s to:'the mid-1800s, the predominate type of structure was of adobe, and in a style characterized by small, single-storystructures, thick adobe walls, low sloping tile roofs and wood detailing. These early Spanish Colonial Style buildings, also referred to as simply "Adobe" style buildings, did not survive, but a few good examples from the mid- to late 1800s remain, such as the historic Rodriguez Adobe and the Rosa Butron Adobe. Adobe refers not only\i6j'he building type or style, but also to the type of construction. Adobe structures must,by definition, be built (at least partially) with adobe bricks—large, unfired bricks made with clay-type soil mixed with straw as a binder. The unreinforced adobe walls typically vary from one and one-half to six feet thick, resting on a dirt or rock foundation. Roofs are typically tile or wood shingle, resting on heavy wooden roof timbers. Door and window openings are normally surrounded by heavy timbers, often with a prominent timber lintel above window and door openings. Also, there are often arches and porches. If there is a second story it usually has a balcony with railings, a variation often referred to as the "Monterey Style." Of the remaining adobes in and around San Luis Obispo, most were built in the second half of the 1800s. Many were altered through the years with the addition of wood siding, composition -27 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft 11is[oric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 roofing, and exterior finishes that in some cases, obscured the adobe structure beneath. Clapboard siding was commonly used to protect adobe blocks from weathering, or to create a more stylish, ornamental appearance. In some cases, adobes were covered with a stucco or plaster finish. L-OW 5-LMMO TILE RIXrt= iFAY'( WOOOC11 RGbP GR- F(�AT IFS 'C(MBEF-5 AWe' -AFU+E9 C'GaCRS M-A6T O6N16 WtTFF OPEWt (t.hSTEt< FINISH { Z;. PROhNNBNT TIMBER .... •• uNTM— ,^ecw wtxxwjo0nfz- /— Examples of this style. Sauer/Adams Adobe, 964,Chorro St The Murray Adobe, 474 Monterey St The Hays/Lattimer Adobe at 642 Monterey. -28 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines J Attachment 7 June 2010 Victorian What is generally known as "Victorian style' actually refers to a constellation of styles popular during the 1860s to the early 1900s. Common to this architectural style are examples of European interpretations of classical architecture, including such styles as Gothic Revival, Stick and Eastlake, Queen Anne and Folk Victorian. Many houses within the Old Town and Downtown Historic Districts fall into this general category, often incorporating elements from different styles. This architectural style represents the more ornate;higher quality wood frame structures built between the late 1800s and the mid-1920s. Characteristic features include: -symmetrically arranged, double-hung windows -diamond shaped roof shingles -oval or narrow, tall windows -highly detailed ornamental.elements . -turret and cupola roofs prominentwood steps and porch -shingle facade or roof gable ends - post pierfoundation -steep gable or hip roofs -raised foundations _........._...—Tur-KaT ANO CUPOLA SfEE'Pt-Y ('I TGNGO (SGdP 511�U;IWffi fn1Ci-0 RGePS _ —5HIN6L5:. WORK IN R=�RRTIY� fkA7�FE ��=•`�.. _ __ �=v Eth9LE` ENS PTiGYE'. eAfE% OF GA84E RZT yrMMarwcAL Of, W", _ cv�w e-yuric�FxrE�*ac� Ay{(AMaMCA-PKhDe i41N0aW5 �GOPhTVE�DEI•IGh'{` �' � ----PROMINENT ��NC+pgl5 ERACXET�5PI1101-E41Ci<K � _• I _ COVERED PO� WMi UZAAMENTMi 6LftM-S-- d= _ _ - WIpE 5!PR5 ' r1.v+ Examples of this style:' The Erickson House at 687 Islay Street The Righetti House, 1314 Palm Street The Stanton House, 752 Buchon Street - 29 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Ifistoric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Folk Victorian A Victorian style characterized by simple housing forms with less elaborate detailing than other Victorian houses. Detailing is located primarily along the porch and cornice line. Folk Victorian houses often borrow detailing from Queen Anne and Italianate styles. Characteristic features include: -symmetrically arranged, double-hung windows -diamond shaped roof shingles -oval or narrow, tall windows -prominent wood steps and porch -shingle facade or roof gable ends - post pier foundation -steep gable or hip roofs -raised foundations �Y= l ear-owes oerAu.+r+� >� - - MA-WWN AMUS - ctc rGM.ths+mt: .. �` n'FRhHEEOi GLI'16,0 Pwwtie r Fgwr E1hY:fr PP9Ti PIER (A16EP _ _ fRlNO/710t� Examples of this style,include 756 Palm Street `••. 855 Toro Street. - 30 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Colonial Revival/Neoclassical The Colonial Revival style refers to a revival style popular in the early twentieth century that was inspired by the early houses of the Atlantic seaboard. Compared to the highly detailed ornamental elements and asymmetry that defined the Victorian styles, Colonial Revival buildings are symmetrical and relatively austere. Colonial Revival buildings are based on Georgian, Federal, and Dutch Colonial styles and are often fused with Neoclassical decorative elements such as classical porch columns. Closely related to the Colonial Revival style, the Neoclassical style was a popular style in San Luis Obispo from 1900 to the 1920s. Neoclassical style encompasses both the Classic Box and the Neoclassic Rowhouse. "Rowhouse" as used here refers to detached houses often seen in a row. Characteristic features include: -hipped or gambrel roof -raised wood porch With free-standing columns -symmetrical -dormer windows CWTBFEO Oft, 6h WcED tiYh�MeT'N ChL DK. h-GGEK(' N11NCkJW TD T...—. P7hLhli(;E.O fMC.I.�NEi 51"Pt'Ef GF 9m-_.---� TO 311` ClA-;61LAt- 21sIF'C EM6Fti 15fiM£N'f5 �----.—t ' RRIWC=-tWNG r0gz04MI. PAU= WtNgaw5 WCW 'APINC� OR lj O f3U1'dF}– Examples of this style include: 1059 Leff Street, The Bradbury Sanitarium, 743 Leff, The Bullard House, 1624 Morro Street. - 31 - ft City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Aachment 7 June 2010 Spanish Ecclectic After the 1915 Panama-California Exposition there was a renewed interest in Spanish Colonial architecture, and California especially began to embrace and reinterpret its Spanish and Mexican past. There are many examples of the Spanish Ecclectic or Spanish Colonial Revival style in houses, commercial and public buildings throughout California where Spanish and Mexican cultural influences were strongest. The Spanish Ecclectic style incorporated many details from different periods of Spanish architecture, and was popular in San Luis in,bispo in the 1920s and 1930s. Characteristic features include: -barrel or flat tile roofs -parapets (trowled plaster or stucco) -flat or low-pitch roofs -arched doors and windows -tile chimney cap, vents and drains -ornamental wood and metal accents df Nvl�k"rA P✓R(EL GR r nr �oR UM) h .. ApCMED [� / FWO FN14LL'W5----- OF 1.041-. . titer+ Rc17fYi -nL, �aA'0 >> .. 63EXi"E(T R BLED r• VENTS MOO Examples of this style;include: The M.F. Avila House, 1443 Osos Street The Righetti Apartments, 1305 Palm Street. PR — /�c City of San Luis Obispo-Draft'Mistoric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Craftsman By the end of the first World War and continuing through the mid-1940s, a distinctive architectural style evolved in California. Strongly influenced by the Greene brothers, a design firm based in California, Craftsman houses featured less ornate detailing than the Victorian style but still relied on extensive use of wood for structural and exterior elements. This style is sometimes referred to as "Craftsman Bungalow." Characteristic features include: -raised concrete or wood porch with tapered columns clapboard siding or plaster exterior finish -medium to low pitch gable or hip roofs with side eave overhangs and dormers -wide roof fascia boards -open eaves with exposed rafters, often with custom work on rafter ends -post and pierfoundations -double hung wood windows with divided lights OMW WLT1t I-Yr 6wL -r mom. WtTN fxroeeD WTS(- C K81 OR 6MFP TA1t-5 WRMEI�:i Mp7f'Fnit:• •fn uhu Mf M WWF- ;ITCH ROS KITH FiENp�DuS Olgi1'ot}C5 -'�" ----WINPoW+>WITf DIYIPt3V MKS He^ IX (CAvr+�•eo) e� Vf'PEt;SAE,t4 f _ - CW deo -� raNam+k tkl6Ep LgILREI�` OR �`�- • WDOO PCfGW 4JPR4 PVw OR T/SeRED CLWMNS Examples of this style include: The Payne House, 1144 Palm Street 1068 Pismo Street 1034 Church Street. - 33 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines - Attachment 7 June 2010 Classical or Main Street "Classical" or Main Street style of architecture covers a wide range of architectural periods. As with other architectural styles, this style represents a range of architectural influences, including Gothic, Classical Revival, Italianate, and Romanesque styles, re-interpreted to apply to American downtowns and commercial areas. Many of the City's larger commercial structures in the Downtown Historic District fall under this category. Characteristic features include: -extensive use of brick and rustic stonework - cast or wrought iron storefront.structures -highly symmetrical window and door - large glass areas (wide bays) openings - Neo-classic prominent cornices -use of towers, columns, pediments, and - high and open ground floor for retail sales ornate cornices or friezes masonry side walls . -flat roof with parapets flat roofs with parapets -use of porch, balconies and/or peristyle. I OF 1G14ER5 Or.N^9-- 7''--MIrNIMe, U6r-- KAr FVOF6 CORNiG of. F�1E�E5-- / OF ff_k K DF WI114 I Ruhr c. SmK�Wor PnRn rar `�T6SmcrKict�/6Au,�so U5E or PIU;VWS n fitp� s ® a e u a � KLchi orEN cRtuHo KcrY VI.r-er&I 5}I B5 Examples of this style include: The Sinsheimer Building, 849 Monterey Street The Andrews Building, 998 Monterey Street The Johnson Building 796 Higuera Street. - 34 - 1 Attachment 7 City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines ;-J June 2010 Tudor Revival The Tudor Revival style is one of a series of revivals that gained popularity in the 1920s and 1930s in San Luis Obispo. This revival style is a reinterpretation of late Medieval English houses. Many of the houses in the Mt. Pleasanton-Anholm area fall into this style. Detail characteristics include: Characteristic features include- -steeply gable and hipped roofs -varied eave line height -decorative half-timbering -plaster or brick exterior siding -wooden shingles, occasionally imitating thatch J�E�N-Y G46�ED ---�kRI P,P OF. 14IPreD ROoF — EAvE LINO FYE'.IGi°I'S DB�dFAlIVE -- _ - MhLF-IIMEF�!tY WIT}} fLRSfER INFLh \ I - OY _ �.. —VEft71CM"_r WINpOWy hGCENT AfaN r- `i' 9mmeI 9VZM5,tD GYh7F5 IV!NC27J•.'�.i .... _..- earRYWhYi Examples of this style include: The J.J. Dunne House at 59 Benton Way The Vard Shepherd House at 148 Broad Street City of San Luis Obispo-Draft I' istoric Preservation Program Guidelines ,, „ Attachment 7 June 2010 Modernistic The Modernistic style refers to both Art Deco and Art Modeme, sometimes called Streamline Modeme. The Modernistic style, popular in the 1930s, was more commonly applied to commercial or public buildings, although it occasionally was used in.residential architecture. Relatively few Modernistic structures exist in San Luis Obispo. Characteristic features include -smooth stucco wall cladding -asymmetrical -flat roof -geometric stylized motifs,in Art Deco; coping at roof line in Art Moderne 6µ04m PXfIY OK ---P XT' RGt'P Wt Ft VAL., 5LIrOeQLOPItJel ;77EPY80 FhchD GYlTII.EYf�EO r- RGUpDED PND/YX frlEft';r�MGS 9rwpar> WAtA, - N✓r9GING }IOR120nlTM. — WmR7w P.trt�i+� � wtWxw T(ft� Examples of this style include: The Doton Building, 777 Higuera Street, The Fremont Theater, 1035 Monterey Street. - 36 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 5.15 Architectural Style Sketchbook (from Rehab Right, City of Oakland) Queen Anne Examples: -690 Islay -1504 Broad -793 Buchon a - Queen Anne QU_=AM Cottage Examples: Q RE EEB 1 Single Story Italianate Examples: - 37 - Pis- �� City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Eastern Shingle Cottage Examples: 8 Classic Box Examples: - CLASSIC BOX i Neo-Classic Rowhouse Examples: -38 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines , June 2010 5.2 Historic District Descriptions Figure 5.2.1: Historic Districts in San Luis Obispo city of san Luis osispo histocic 01stuicts M1 street .TCN" Downtown ``�$�• Old Torun Rallm _ 0 ous o:s os Man l - 39 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines U June 2010 5.2.1 Old Town Historic District Setting Established in 1987, the Old Town Historic District abuts the Railroad district on the southeast and is generally bounded by Pacific and Islay streets on the north and south, and by Santa Rosa and Beach streets on the east and west. As one of the City's oldest residential neighborhoods, Old Town was built up historically around the turn of the twentieth century, with older structures dating back to the 1880s. It consists of five subdivisions: the Mission Vineyard Tract recorded in March 1873, the Dallidet Tract recorded in 1876, the Murray Church Tract recorded in 1876, the Ingleside Homestead Tract, recorded in 1887, and the La Vina Homestead Tract, recorded in 1903. The District encompasses 86.1 acres, or 0.13 square miles. The District's prominent location, located just south of and uphill from the Downtown commercial district, made it a desirable neighborhood for the City's emerging merchant class and leading citizens. Here, residents were close to businesses and commerce,but could avoid the flooding and mud that plagued the Downtown. Home sites were laid out in regular grid patterns, with relatively wide (60 foot right-of-way) streets and 60 foot wide lots. The resultant wide streets and lot frontages allowed deep (20+ feet) setbacks and ample landscaping, reinforcing the district's prosperous image. Today the high concentration of 100 year old or older residences establishes the District's predominant architectural and visual character. Site Features and Characteristics Common site features and characteristics include: �. ' A. Prominent street yard setbacks of 20 feet or more B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear -- yard C. Finish floors raised 2 3 above finish grade D. Front entries oriented toward street with prominent walk, stairs and porch E. Front building facades oriented parallel to street 1060 Pismo Street, South Elevation - 40 - -1 S/�' � City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Architectural Character In keeping with its peak period of development between 1880 and 1920, the Old Town District has many examples of High Victorian architecture, a style popular in California during that time period that reflected prosperity, power and discriminating taste. This included several style variations, such as Queen Anne, Italianate, Stick and Gothic Revival influences, especially along the top of the hill within the district roughly aligned with Buchon Street. Other, more modest structures with simpler styles abound in other areas of the district. These buildings were first home to the burgeoning merchant class in San Luis Obispo that emerged during the turn of the century. These styles include Neo-classic Row House, Folk Victorian, and Craftsman Bungalow, with many homes borrowing architectural details from several styles. Most of the houses in this district were designed and constructed by the homes' first occupants or by local builders and were influenced by architectural pattern books of the time period. The shared first story porches along Pismo Street are a good example of a common design feature linking buildings. Predominant architectural features include: x � A. Two- and rarely three-story houses B. Mostly gable and hip roof types ' C. Highly ornamented roof features, +, including prominent fascias, i bargeboards, gable end treatments, _ decorative shingles,shingles, prominent -- — `- pediments or cornices i<< '• D. Traditional fenestration, such as double-hung, wood sash windows, ; divided light windows, ornamental front doors, wood screen doors E. Painted wood surface material, including siding and decorative moldings 1543 Morro Street, East Elevation Although many of the buildings were built at separate times, the pattern, rhythm and repetition of common design elements or detailing of historic building facades along Old Town streets creates a prevailing theme and character for the district. Individually Contributing Elements in the ' Old Town District Some buildings within the bounds of the Old Town District, constructed outside of the period of significance for the district, 1880- 1920, do not share the elements outlined in - - the above description, but have achieved LI M.F. Avila House, 1443 Osos Street, East � 1 Elevation City of San Luis Obispo- Draft fifstoric Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 historical significance on their own and therefore individually contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo. The M.F. Avila House at 1443 Osos Street is an example of a Spanish Revival style building built in the late 1920s that has been placed on the City's Master List as a significant resource, in this case for its craftsmanship as well as its association with a historically significant local person. St. Stephens Episcopal Church at 1344 Nipomo Street built in 1873 is an example of Carpenter Gothic style. The first Episcopal church in San Luis Obispo County, St. Stephens is historically significant both its architecture and its association with the pioneer period of San Luis Obispo. Non-Contributing Elements in the Old Town District Non-contributing buildings are those buildings that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have not achieved historical significance. Most of the contemporary buildings in the district fall into this category. Non-contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include- A. Contemporary stucco or other material exterior siding B. Flat or extremely low pitched roof C. Aluminum sliding windows D. Rectilinear, "boxy" shape or very Ir to rte- horizontal massing E. Unarticulated wall surfaces The Vista Grande Apartments, 1415 Morro Street, East Elevation. -42 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 8:2� 3 := q 1 -fi 1059 Leff Street; Biddle House, 559 Pismo Street; 1624, 1636, 1642 Morro Street; and Pismo Buchon Alley from Pismo Street -43 - �l j �l� City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 5.2.2 Downtown Historic District Setting The Downtown Historic District encompasses the oldest part of the City of San Luis Obispo and contains one of the City's highest concentrations of historic sites and structures. The historic Mission San Luis Obispo de Tolosa is at the geographic and historic center of the district, which is bounded roughly by Palm and Marsh Streets on the north and south, Osos and Nipomo Streets on the east and west, plus Dana Street as the northwest corner. Although some structures date to the Spanish and Mexican eras (1772-1850) and the American pioneer settlement era (1850x- 1870), the majority of surviving structures date from the 1870s to the 1920s. The district is comprised of two subdivisions: the Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded 1878 and the Mission Vineyard Tract recorded in March of 1873. The Downtown Historic District has an area of 61.5 acres and in 2010 includes 98 designated historic structures. The Downtown Historic District was developed,along,the City's earliest commercial corridors along Monterey, Higuera, Chorro, Garden and Marsh Streets, and has retained its historical use as San Luis Obispo's commercial and civic center. Commercial structures were laid out in a regular grid pattern, with buildings set at the back of sidewalks and relatively narrow (60 foot right-of-way) streets. The resultant narrow streets and zero building setbacks reinforce the district's human scale and vibrant Main Street image. Site Features and Characteristics Common site features "and characteristics include: A. Buildings located at back of sidewalk with zero street and side setbacks B. Finish floors at grade C. "Recessed front entries onented'toward the street r D. Front facades oriented toward the .y street' E. Trees place&at regular intervals along : ;eta the street 721, 717 and 715 Higuera Street, North Architectural Character Elevation Built during the San Luis Obispo's boom time circa 1870s-1910s (when the Town's population increased over 800 percent from 600 people in 1868 to 5,157 in 1910), the district's commercial architectural styles reflect the increasing wealth of the times. Architectural styles present in the Downtown District include examples of Classical Revival, Italianate and Romanesque structures, and more modest early American commercial. Although a few structures were designed by outside architects (specifically from San Francisco and Los Angeles), the majority of Downtown -44 - Pte--i?� City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 buildings were designed and built by local builders, including the Maino family, John Chapek, and Frank Mitchell. Predominant architectural features include: 4 A. One to two stories (occasionally three) B. Flat or low pitched roof, often with a parapet C. Wide entablature or projecting cornice that often 46 includes classical architectural details such as dentils,brackets and molding D. First floor windows are horizontally oriented storefront windows, often with display space facing street. In multi-story structures, windows - T are vertically oriented, typically with double hung, wood sashes, and symmetrically arranged so that they are dimensionally taller than their width E. Structures follow simple rectilinear or "boxy' -" — buildings forms F. Masonry or smooth stucco wall siding G. Contrasting bulkheads along base of street fagade Smith Building and Union H. Use of awnings, historic signs, second-story Hardware Building, 1119 and overhangs and canopies 1129 Garden Street, East I. Use of transom windows above storefronts Elevation Individually Contributing Elements in the Downtown District Not all historic resources in the Downtown Historic District were built during the district's period of significance of 1870-1930. These buildings generally do not exhibit the signature architectural elements described above but do contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo in their own right based on age, architectural �•' °P style or historical association. By virtue of their significance, these resources also merit preservation. For example, the Doton Building is an example of Streamline Moderne architecture from the 1930s. This _ building was placed on the Master List as a significant resource due to its craftsmanship and the rarity of this particular style in San Luis Obispo. Additional examples include the Laird building at 1023 Garden. Built in the - - 1880s, the Laird building is one of the City's last remaining Pioneer False front buildings. The Golden State Doton Building, 777 Higuera -45 - f Street, North Elevation Si ' City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Creamery building at 570 Higuera is historically significant to San Luis Obispo for its association with the dairy industry, an industry integral to the City's development. Non-Contributing Elements in Downtown Non -contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have not achieved historical significance. Most of the post-1950 contemporary buildings in the district fall into this latter category. Non-contributing architectural styles, e materials or site features include: { A. Buildings setback from street or side i� property lines B. Building height, form or massing which contrasts markedly with the 1` r prevailing 2-3 story pattern n � C. Wood, metal or other contemporary material siding, or "faux" - architectural materials or features. 1�— D. Asymmetrical arrangement of doors and windows 1010 Nipomo Street, South and West Elevations E. Raised, non-recessed or offset street entries to buildings Residential Although the majority of the Downtown District is commercial, within the district is a smaller residential section, primarily along Dana Street and also down Monterey Street to the west of the mission. This subsection includes a spectrum of settlement from the mid I 91 century to the 1920s. Lots were generally platted in regular grids, although curved along Dana to accommodate the creek. Site features and characteristics- Residential: A. Street yard setbacks of 20 feet or more, often with low walls (2 feet) and fences at sidewalk B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear yard - C. Front entries oriented toward the streetwith prominent porch and steps D. Front facades oriented toward the _j street — - _ e_---- r 756 Palm Street, South Elevation -46 - ��b � r City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 The architectural styles in the residential area of the Downtown district are varied and represent several different periods of development in San Luis Obispo. The oldest, vernacular Adobe, dates back the early pioneer period. The Rosa Butr6n de Canet adobe at 466 Dana is from this period and is one of the few surviving adobes in San Luis Obispo. Folk and High Victorian structures built during the population influx at tum of the twentieth century. Finally, Spanish Revival, a style that achieved popularity in San Luis Obispo during the housing boom of 1920s and 1930s which was itself funded in part by the maturation of war bonds from World War I. Architectural features- Residential: A. One and rarely two story buildings B. Gable and hip roof types predominate #P #-` C. Traditional fenestration, such as double-hung wood sash windows ornamental front doors, wood screen �y ',�.� w ��•' � `,.� doors D. Painted wood or smooth stucco siding. � � G 4S �- 469 Dana Street, North Elevation - 47 - `t'45 —IT?— City of San Luis Obispo - Draft ti )toric Preservation Program Guidelines AttcaC h i718;^L 7 June 2010 •L �Q��'t �I :i spw IF x J ` rxl v i Murray Adobe, 474 Monterey Street;Anderson House, 532 Dana Street; Hotel Wineman, 849 Higuera Street; 762 Higuera Street -48 - �( 1�^� , City of San Luis Obispo-Draft lnstoric Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 5.2.3 Chinatown Setting The Chinatown Historic District was established in 1995 to recognize the important contributions of the Chinese community to the City's history and development. As originally developed, Chinatown is an enclave within the Downtown Historic District, and extends one block along both sides of Palm Street between Chorro and Morro Streets. Chinese immigrants arrived in San Luis Obispo in the 1870s and were instrumental in the construction of many transportation projects, including the Pacific Coastal Railroad (1874), the Paso-Cambria Road (now Highway 46) (1876), and sections of the Southern Pacific Railroad.(1886-1894), as well as providing other goods and services for the community. The Chinatown Historic District comprises a small part of the City's original subdivision, the Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded in 1878. It is a very small historic district with an area of 4.4 acres and has 11 designated resources including one listed on the National Register of Historic Places (Ah Louis Store). The 800 block of Palm Street was the residential, cultural and commercial center for San Luis Obispo's Chinese citizens, beginning in the late 191h century and lasting for around 70 years. The surviving structures span the district's period of significance, 1884-1945. Although many of the original wood structures in Chinatown were demolished in the 1950s to make room for public parking, the City established a historic district to recognize and preserve the area's remaining historic features. Site Features and Characteristics Common site features/characteristics include: A. Buildings located at back of public sidewalks with zero setbacks B. Finish floors at grade level. �h C. Recessed front entries oriented toward the street F -- D. Front facades oriented parallel and r- facing the street E. Trees placed at regular intervals along - - the street 798 Palm St, South and East Elevations Architectural Character Given the limited area of the Chinatown District and the small number of contributing buildings it contains, it is difficult to isolate features within the district that are unique to and separate from - 49 - 7P�fJ ���q City of San Luis Obispo-Draft lhstoric Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 the adjoining Downtown Historic District. See Downtown Historic Description for general architectural features. Only four buildings along Palm Street have a historical association with Chinese-owned businesses and retain unifying architectural details: the Shanghai Low Restaurant at 861 Palm Street, the Mee Heng Low Restaurant at 815 Palm Street, Ah Louis Store at 800 and Chongs Candy Store at 798 Palm Street. Architectural details specific to Chinatown: A. Historic signs with Chinese imagery or characters B. Second story overhang C. Balconies with wood or metal railings f� D. Use of brick, tile or stucco and bright exterior colors. �. E. Prominent use of neon for the buildings and signs constructed in the 1940s. - F. Rectilinear building forms, predominately with parapet roofs and vertically oriented windows on ground 861 Palm, North Elevation and upper floors. G. Use of roof and projecting signs using Chinese style graphics. Individually Contributing Elements in the Chinatown District Not all historic resources in the Chinatown !ten y� 4 4 f�Y v7J tet•p PP •• Historic District were built during the District's period of significance. These buildings were constructed outside of the o: period of significance of 1890-1940, generally do not exhibit the signature architectural elements described above, but do contribute to the historic character of San 4 + Luis Obispo in their own right based on age, architectural style or historical association. By virtue of their significance, these resources also merit preservation. Sauer/Adams Adobe, 964 Chorro Street, An example is the Sauer/Adams Adobe at West Elevation 964 Chorro, a rare two-story wood-covered adobe building built in the 1830s. The Sauer-Adams Adobe is significant for its association with the Mexican era development of San Luis Obispo as well as for the rarity of its two-story, "Monterey Style' design, one of the few remaining of this type in San Luis Obispo County. - 50- 0 City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Non-Contributing Elements in Chinatown Non -contributing structures are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have not achieved historical significance. Due to its small size and the 1950s demolition of much of the original Chinatown structures, the remaining historic character of Chinatown is especially vulnerable to loss through demolition or incompatible alteration or development. Non-Contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include: A. Buildings set back from street or side property lines B. Building height, form or massing which greatly contrasts with the prevailing one and two story pattern ' C. Raised, non-recessed or offset �� , entrances to buildings D. Prominent use of metal, glass, concrete block masonry or other - - exterior siding materials which visually contrast with the District's signature architectural elements. E. Use of architectural forms or details that contrast sharply with or visually, 817 Palm, South-East Elevation detract from the District's signature architectural elements. - 51 - V-f'S ��I City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines JfiuCr '2;1': June 2010 QN- .� L6 ©44F6�Offf' 4��1�� •,I%I r _ � —ice� ._..— _ i 817, 815 and 811 Palm Street; close up historic Chop Suey sign at 861 Palm Street;Ah Louis Store 800 Palm Street; close up of the and Chinese characters at 815 Palm Street - 52 - -PA s'- I�Z- City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 5.2.4 Mill Street Historic District Setting Established in 1987, the Mill Street Historic District is a residential neighborhood bounded by Pepper and Toro Streets on the east and west, and Peach and Palm Streets on the north and south. The Mill Street District is part of one subdivision, The Town of San Luis Obispo, recorded in 1878, although the area informally has been referred to as Fremont Heights. For its land area, Mill Street Historic District has the highest concentration of historic structures of the City's five Historic districts. It is a relatively small district, with an area of 20 acres or 0.03125 square miles, and as of January of 2010 had 84 listed historic properties. The Mill Street district was developed at the turn of the 19`h century, with the majority of the existing buildings dating from the 1900s to 1920s, the district's primary period of historical and architectural significance. The district was developed on high ground with originally very wide (100 ft) lots in response to both the seasonal flooding and fires that plagued early development in San Luis Obispo. A few of these wide lots remain in the 1300 block of both Mill Street and Palm Street,but the majority of them were later re-subdivided into 50-60 foot wide lots. Site Features and Characteristics Common site features and characteristics include: A. Trees spaced at regular intervals along the street (especially on Mill Street) B. Distinctive Camphor Trees lining both sides of Mill Street between Johnson and •'-Y. ' r` Pepper, a key entry corridor for the A district C Consistent street yard setbacks of 20 feet o �Z - ♦ ✓..< D. Coach barns (garages) recessed into rear ''. ' �•. yard E. Finish floors raised 2-3 above finish �. grade _ F. Front entries oriented toward street, with -- - prominent walk, stairs and entry porches. 1344 Mill Street, South Elevation G. Front building facades oriented parallel to street Architectural Character Developed during a population boom in San Luis Obispo circa 1900s-1920s, the district's residential architectural styles reflect the prosperity of its residents. While older and more elaborate residences are located on the 1300 block of both Palm and Mill Streets, the majority of - 53 - q)H1'S7 /0 3 City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 historic homes were more modest residences. The close proximity to the court house meant that Mill Street was home to many county employees, including county assessors, attorneys, and county clerks. The Mill Street District encompasses many different architectural styles, including revival styles popular at the turn of the twentieth century. These styles include Neo-classic Row House, Victorian (with elements of Gothic Revival, Queen Anne, Stick and Eastern Shingle), Tudor Revival, Mission Revival, and Craftsman Bungalow, with many homes borrowing architectural details from more than one style. Most buildings in this district were built by local builders, including E.D. Bray and James Maino and were influenced by architectural pattern books of the time period. Predominant architectural features include: A. One- and occasionally two-story houses B. Mostly gable and hip roof types C. Traditional fenestration, such as double-hung, wood sash windows, ornamental front doors, wood screen [:, - — -�, :�• doors �� D. Ornamental roof features, including °> prominent fascias,bargeboards, prominent pediments or cornices E. Painted wood or stucco surface material, including siding and molding 1264 and 1270 Palm Street, South Elevation Individually Contributing ]Elements in the Mill Street District Not all historic resources in the Mill Street _ Historic District were built during the district's period of significance. Those 'j_-N buildings date from the late 1800s, generally do not exhibit the signature architectural — elements described above, but do contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo - iln — in their own right based on age, architectural _ style or historical association. By virtue of _ their significance, these resources also merit preservation. For example, the Buckley House at 777 Johnson Avenue is a converted carriage 777 Johnson Avenue, East Elevation house built in the 1880s and is significant for its design, specifically the board and batten siding, of which there very few examples are left in the City. The Shipsey House at 1266 Mill Street, a National Register property, is an example of 4 City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines AftaChment 7 June 2010 Eastern Stick and significant for both its architectural style and its association with William Shipsey, attorney and mayor of San Luis Obispo from 1898 to 1901. Non-Contributing Elements in the Mill Street District Non -contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have not achieved historical significance. Most of the post-1950 contemporary buildings in the district fall into this latter category. Non-contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include: A. Aluminum sliding windows B. Rectilinear, "boxy'' shape _ C. Metal -or other contemporary material siding, or "faux" architectural materials or features. D. Unarticulated wall surfaces C E. Non-recessed or offset street entries to buildings 1243 Mill Street, North Elevation - 55 - 7 1 5 ��� City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines U A"Lac'-I m a 'int 7 June 2010 y i c z `L / {p31 LI . „ z — _ - .. 1262 Mill Street; 1261 Mill Street; 1143, 1137 and 1127 Peach Street; Righetti House, 1314 Palm Street - 56 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines C June 2010 5.2.5 Railroad Historic District Setting Established in 1998, the Railroad Historic District boundaries follow the historic boundaries of the Southern Pacific rail yard. The district is bounded by railroad right-of-way on the east, from Johnson Avenue on the north to Orcutt Road on the south, on the northwest generally by Leff Street, and on the west by Broad Street and the railroad right-of-way. The district includes a residential and commercial area on the west side of the tracks, and abuts the Old Town Historic District along its northwest and north boundary. The Southern Pacific (or "Espee") standard gauge railroad arrived in San Luis Obispo on May 4`h, 1894. By 1901, San Luis Obispo was a part of the completed railroad line from San Francisco to Los Angeles, and served as the main layover and maintenance yard for the coastal route. The SP railroad operated in tandem with the older, narrow gauge railroad, the Pacific Coast Railway, or PCR. The PCR was a regional railway with a station on South and Higuera - the development of a spur line along South connected the PCR with the Southern Pacific rail yard. The Railroad District is a part of nine older subdivisions: the Beebee Phillips Tract recorded in 1874, Fairview Addition recorded in 1887, Haskins Tract recorded in 1887, Ingleside Homestead Tract recorded in 1887, the McBride Tract recorded in 1887, the Loomis Addition recorded in 1887, Maymont Addition recorded in 1888, Loomis and Osgood Re-subdivision recorded in 1894 and the Imperial Addition recorded in 1897. The Railroad District has an area of 80.7 acres or 0.126 square miles and 38 designated historic structures. Development in the Railroad Historic District corresponded to the development of the Southern Pacific Railroad yard. Commercial and residential buildings were constructed to accommodate railway workers, freight and passengers, and employees of Southern Pacific and related businesses. Surviving historic structures date from 1894 to 1945, corresponding with the peak activity of the rail yard and the district's period of significance, and most were constructed from 1894 to 1920. The buildings were laid out in a fairly regular grid near the station, accommodating the curve of the rail line and the diagonal path of Santa Barbara. South of Upham the lots are much larger to accommodate the railroad structures. Site Features and Characteristics Common site features/characteristics include: - A. Commercial buildings located at r `fit back of sidewalk with zero street —� setbacks _ . B. Front building facades oriented parallel to street C. Finish floors at grade D. Recessed front entries oriented �"�'� toward the street Channel Commercial Company, 1880 FSS - 57 - Santa Barbara Avenue, West Elevation City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines - - June 2010 Architectural Character The predominant architectural style within the Railroad Historic District is Railroad Vernacular. Railroad Vernacular is characterized by simplicity of form and detailing, with wood, brick or plaster siding, and is a style favored by railroad construction for its easy construction. As a practical vemacular style it also incorporates other elements of other architectural styles including Classical Revival and Mission Revival. Although many of the buildings within the district were not constructed by the railroad, their use of Railroad Vernacular styles design reflects the unifying focus of the district. The buildings in the Railroad District are a mix of simple, yet elegant houses and practical, industrial-oriented commercial buildings, which create a distinctive neighborhood. The architectural character and important historical elements are described in the Railroad District Plan. The Plan includes design guidelines that illustrate architecturally compatible design treatments for new development. Predominant architectural details include: A. One- and two-story buildings predominate B. Gable and some hip roof types of low to medium pitch, occasionally with parapets C. Predominantly painted wood siding, 3 with some masonry or smooth plaster 3 wall siding — _ D. Traditional fenestration, such as double-hung, wood sash windows, and fixed divided light windows 1901 Santa Barbara, East Elevation E. Rectilinear massing, with equal or lesser volume on second floor F. Simple detailing often along the roof line including brackets _ Tribune Republic Building, east elevation = 1263 Santa Barbara Avenue r �+ N f_. City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Individually Contributing]Elements in the Railroad District Not all designated historic resources in the Railroad Historic District were built during the District's period of significance, 1894-1945. These buildings were constructed outside of the period of significance, generally do not exhibit the signature architectural elements described above, but do contribute to the historic character of San Luis Obispo in their own right based on age, architectural style or historical association. By virtue of their significance, these resources also merit preservation. For example, the Tribune Republic Building, built in 1873, is believed to be the earliest surviving wood commercial building in San Luis Obispo and has been placed on the City's Master List and the National Register of Historic Places for its association with the City's first newspaper. Non-Contributing Elements in the Railroad District Non -contributing buildings are those that both do not meet the criteria outlined above and have not achieved historical significance. Most of the post-1950 contemporary buildings in the district fall into this latter category. n-_ - Non-contributing architectural styles, materials or site features include: A. Building height, form, scale or massing which contrasts markedly with the district's prevailing I and 2- _ story buildings B. Metal, contemporary stucco or other --- contemporary siding, including "faux" architectural details or features that =-_ - - contrast markedly with traditional railroad vernacular forms, details and Modern addition to 1880 Santa Barbara, materials West Elevation C. Asymmetrical arrangement of doors or windows D. Non-recessed or offset street entries to buildings Residential Although the majority of the Railroad District is commercial, there is a small residential area within it which runs along Church Street and Santa Barbara Avenue from Osos to Upham Streets. This area was home to many railroad employees and their families. - 59 - F1 `s ' `8� City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines ` June 2010 Site features and characteristics- Residential: , „ .., A. Residential buildings with modest street setbacks of 10 feet 4 B. Coach barn (garage) recessed into rear ' •',* s""' \ k yard C. Front building facades oriented parallel to street. `_ -- Ui111UIii IPS r _ H D. Finish floors raised 2-3 above finish grade �` ' L E. Front entries oriented toward street, with prominent walk, stairs and porch The houses within the residential district are modest, which reflects their early working class 1034 Church St, South Elevation occupants. Within the district are two hotels, the Call/Parkview Hotel at 1703 Santa Barbara and the Park/Reidy Hotel at 1815 Osos which once served as boarding houses for railroad workers. These vernacular buildings have decorative elements from several styles including Craftsman Bungalow, Classical Revival and Folk Victorian. Architectural features- Residential: A. One and two story buildings B. Gable and some hip roof types of low to medium pitch R �! C. Painted wood surface material, occasionally smooth stucco wall siding D. Traditional fenestration, such as double-hung, wood sash windows, :rte ornamental front doors, wood screen {: _ :.v:.- - doors 1724 Osos, East Elevation ITIS% 1 1 U - 60 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines = June 2010 f �--- z -A. n + x ■is , f III Southern Pacific Railroad Depot, 1011 Railroad Avenue; Park/Reidy Hotel 1815 Osos Street; Southern Pacific Railroad Warehouse,1940 Santa Barbara Avenue; and house located at 1789 Santa Barbara Avenue. - 61 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines AtIlach1' ent June 2010 5.3 Contributing Properties List of Historic Resources, Updated March 24, 2010 Address District or Neighborhood Date listed 1428 Beach Old Town 02/03/87 1520 Beach Old Town 02/03/87 48 Benton Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 1342 Breck East Railroad Area 02/20/07 156 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 207 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 236 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 282 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 301 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 368 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 381 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 397 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 453 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 456 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 457 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 464 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 472 Broad Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 08/18/98 967 Broad Downtown 08/16/83 975 Broad Downtown 08/16/83 1019-23 Broad Downtown 08/16/83 1405 Broad O1dTown 08/16/83 1408-10 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1418 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1421 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1427 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1505 Broad Old Town- 08/16/83 1511-13 Broad Old Town 08/16/83. 1519 Broad, Old Town 08/16/83 1531 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1536 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 1544 Broad Old Town 08/16/83 530 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 533 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 540 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 549 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 575 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 578 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 586-88 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 594 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 641 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 !� q - 62 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines J At-ItdChm2nt 7 June 2010 651 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 654 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 658 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 661 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 665 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 670 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 673 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 676-80 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 677 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 685 Buchon Old Town 08/16/83 722 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 770 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 871 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 880 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 885 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 889 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 966 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 973 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 977 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1015 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1035 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1045 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1051 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1057 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1067 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1110 Buchon O1d.Town 02/03/87 1118 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1124 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1126 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1132 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1135 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1137-Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1144 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1145 Buchon _ Old Town 02/03/87 1151 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1152 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1157 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1160 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1165 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1170 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1175 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1176 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1182 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1189 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 1190 Buchon Old Town 02/03/87 - 63 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — r Vac h m e=-nt 7 June 2010 742 Center Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 755 Center Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 30 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 45 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 59 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 63 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 69 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 115 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 128 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 158 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 173 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 183 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 190 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 211 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 360 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 01/05/99 368 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 369 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 395 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 398 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 431 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 453 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 476 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 482 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm '05/04/99 487 Chorro Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 940-42 Chorro Downtown 08/16/83 950 Chorro Chinatown 02/03/87 970 Chorro Downtown 08/16/83 978-80 Chorro Downtown - 08/16/83 984 Chorro Downtown 08/16/83 1023 Chorro Downtown 02/03/87 1111 Chorro Downtown_ 02/03/87 1119 Chorro Downtown 02/03/87 1534 Chorro Old Town 02/03/87 1603 Chorro Old Town .02/03/87 882 Church Old Town 02/03/87 888 Church Old Town 02/03/87 893 Church Old Town 02/03/87 971 Church Railroad 02/03/87 972 Church Old Town 02/03/87 1010 Church Railroad 02/03/87 1018 Church Railroad 02/03/87 1022 Church Railroad 02/03/87 1028 Church Railroad 02/03/87 1034 Church Railroad 02/03/87 465 Dana Downtown 02%03/87 - 64 - City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines `- Attachment 7 June 2010 469 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 507/515 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 522 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 525 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 531 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 543 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 547 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 577 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 579 Dana Downtown 02/03/87 1013 Ella East Railroad 02/20/07 1015 Ella East Railroad 02/20/07 1240 Ella East Railroad 02/20/07 1255 Ella East Railroad 02/20/07 1265 Ella East Railroad 02/20/07 1345 Ella#17 East Railroad 02/20/07 1672 Fairview East Railroad 02/20/07 1110 Garden Downtown 02/03/87 1408 Garden Old Town 02/03/87 1421 Garden Old Town 02/03/87 1425 Garden Old Town' 02/03/87 1536 Garden Old Town 02/03/87 1043 George East Railroad 02%20/07 1127 George East Railroad 02/20/07 1205 George East Railroad 02/20/07 1215 George East Railroad 02/20/07 1234 George East Railroad 02/20/07 1236 George East Railroad 02/20/07 673 Higuera Downtown - 02/03/87 685 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 686 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 698 Higuera Downtown , 02/03/87 699 Higuera, Downtown 02/03/87 705 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 715 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 717 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 718-20 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 723 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 725 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 728 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 733 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 746 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 751 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 760-70 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 778 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 779-87 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 -V Is- - 65 - City of San Luis Obispo-DrafthistoricPreservation Program Guidelines — ' Attachment 7 June 2010 782-90 Higuera Downtown 08/16/83 858 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 970 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 995 Higuera Downtown 02/03/87 491 Hill Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 1136 Iris East Railroad 02/20/07 1139 his East Railroad 02/20/07 1140 his East Railroad 02/20/07 1204 Iris East Railroad 02/20/07 454 Islay Old Town 08/16/83' 462 Islay Old Town 08/116/83 468 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 481 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 482 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 530 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 539 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 542 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 550 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 559 Islay Old Town. 08/16/83 567 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 572 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 574 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 575 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 641 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 654 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 655 Islay Old'Town 08/16/83 662 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 663 Islay O1dTown 08/16/83 675 Islay Old d Town 08/16/83 676 Islay Old Town 08/16/83 727 Islay' Old Town 02/03/87 744 Islay Old Town" 02/03/87 752 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 753 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 770 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 827 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 862 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 868/870 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 878 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 879 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 893 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 974 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 976 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 978 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 980 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 - 66 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft lbsioric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 1005 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1011 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1017 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1022 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1029 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1034 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1035 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1040 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1044 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1045 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1053 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1061 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1071 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1117 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1120 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 1121 Islay Old Town 02/03/87 772 Johnson Mill 08/16/83 773 Johnson Mill 08/16/83 879 Johnson Mill 02/03/87 949 Johnson Mill 02/03/87 955 Johnson Mill 02/03/87 957 Johnson Mill 02/03/87 1408 Johnson Johnson Avenue 10/07/97 1985 Johnson East Railroad 02/20/07 2105 Johnson East Railroad 02/20/07 968 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 976 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 1020 Leff b1d�Town, -_ 02/03/87 1027 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 1028 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 1035 Leff Old Town_. 02/03/87 1045 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 1051 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 1059 Leff Old Town 02/03/87 754 Lincoln Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 755 Lincoln - Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 762 Lincoln Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 785 Lincoln Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 795 Lincoln Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 412 Marsh none 01/05/99 742 Marsh Downtown 02/03/87 778 Marsh Downtown 02/03/87 704 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 706 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 724 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 G - 67 - I City of San Luis Obispo -Draft 17L,storic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 732 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 770 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 780 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 794 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 804 Meinecke Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 05/04/99 1162 Mill Mill 02/03/87 1165 Mill Mill 02/03/87 1168 Mill Mill 02/03/87 1202 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1214 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1217 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1220 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1234 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1237 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1244 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1253 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1261 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1262 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1265 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1307 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1318 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1333 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1343 Mill Mill `08/16/83 1344 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1350 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1351-63 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1360 Mill Mill 08/16/83 1367 Mill Mill 08/16/83 249 Mission Lane Mt. Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 728 Mission Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 734 Mission Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 752 Mission Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 610 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 614 Monterey Downtown 02/03/87 658 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 667 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 679 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 840 Monterey _ Downtown 02/03/87 857 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 861-63 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 886 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 894 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 895 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 956 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 974-82 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 - 68 - City of San Luis Obispo-DrafthLsforic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 1005 Monterey Downtown 08/16/83 1009 Monterey Downtown 02/03/87 879 Morro Downtown 02/03/87 1009 Morro Downtown 02/03/87 1336 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1346 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1428 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1436 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1444 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1512 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1520 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1527 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1528 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1535 Morro Old Town 02/03/97 1536 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1543 Morro Old Town _ 02/03/87 1544 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1604 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1615 Morro Old Town. 02/03/87 1720 Morro Old Town` _ 02/03/87 1727 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1729 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1731 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1814 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1821 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1829 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 1845 Morro Old Town 02/03/87 501 Mt. View Mt.PleasIanton/Anholm 07/09/99 644 Mt. View Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 676 Mt. View Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 764 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 807 Murray. Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 814 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 815 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 822 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 823 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 829 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 836 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 851 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 854 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 859 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anhohn 07/09/99 869 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 871 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 883 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anhohn 07/09/99 884 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm (Old Town) 07/09/99 - 69 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 894 Murray Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 1415 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1429 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1438 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1516 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1519 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1527 Nipomo Old Town ' 08/16/83 1528 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1535 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1541 Nipomo Old Town 08/16/83 1341 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1350 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1421 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1511 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1514 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1521 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1522 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1526 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1529 Osos Old Town. 02/03/87 1533 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1534 Osos Old Town 62/03/87 1541 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1542 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1609 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1638 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1641 Osos Old Town 02/03/87 1724 Osos Railroad 02/03/87 1734 Osos Railroad`` 02/03/87 1740 Osos Railroad 02/03/87 1750 Osos, Railroad 02/03/87 1814 Osos Railroad` _ 02/03/87 682 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 752 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 756 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 776 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 778 Palm Chinatown 02/03/87 798 Palm Chinatown 08/16/83 811 Palm Chinatown 02/03/87 815 Palm Chinatown 02/03/87 861 Palm Chinatown 02/03/87 1014 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 1020 Palm Downtown 02/03/87 1201 Palm Mill 02/03/87 1208 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1228 Palm Mill 02/03/87 - 70 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft htSYOric Preservation Program Guidelines - Attachment 7 June 2010 1236 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1243 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1248 Palm Mill 08/16/83' 1250 Palm Mill 02/03/87 1259 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1260 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1264 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1269 Palm Mill 02/03/87 1270 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1317 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1320 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1344 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1347 Palm Mill 02/03/87 1355 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1359 Palm Mill 02/03/87 1390 Palm Mill 08/16/83 1134 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1137 Peach Mill 02,/03/87 1143 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1151 Peach Mill .02/03/87 1154 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1156 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1163 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1168 Peach Mill 08/16/83 1206 Peach Mill 02/03/87 1209 Peach Mill 08/16/83 1215 Peach _ Mill , 08/16/83 1221 PeachMill -__ _ 08/16/83 861 Pepper Mill 08/16/83 571 Pismo: Old Town 08/16/83 657 Pismo Old Town. 08/16/83 660,Pismo Old Town 08/16/83 663 Pismo, Old Town 08/16/83 683 Pismo Old Town 08/16/83 729 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 954 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 956 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 958 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 969 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 977 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 979 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 985 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1042 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1050 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1060 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 - 71 - PH6 City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 1068 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1109 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1126 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1133 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1145 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1147 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1152 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1155 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1160 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1163 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1166 Pismo . Old Town 02/03/87 1171 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1176 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1179 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1185 Pismo' Old Town 02/03/87 1190 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 1193 Pismo Old Town 02/03/87 907 Rachel East Railroad 02/20/07 2056 Rachel East Railroad 02/20/07 1020 Railroad Railroad 02/03/87 747 Rougeot Mt. Pleasanion/Anholm 07/09/99 750 Rougeot Mt. Pleasanton/Anholm 07/09/99 762 Rougeot Mt. Pleasanton/Anho.10 07/09/99 783 Rougeot Mt. Pleasanton/Anholin 07/09/99 1908 Ruth East Railroad 02/20/07 1749 Santa Barbara . Railroad 02/03/87 1789 Santa Barbara Railroad 02/03/87 1901 Santa Barbara Railroad 02/03/87 1414 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1426 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1504 Santa Rosa Old Town_ 02/03/87 1512 Santa,Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1515 Santa.Rosa . Old Town 02/03/87 1520 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1521 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1530 Santa Rosa -'Old Town 02/03/87 1606 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1617 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1624 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1627 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1633 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1705 Santa.Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1707 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1720 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 1728 Santa Rosa Old Town 02/03/87 - 72 - l ) City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Attachment 7 1730 Santa Rosa Railroad 02/03/87 1731 Santa Rosa Railroad 02/03/87 2006 Swazey East Railroad 02/20/07 2033 Swazey East Railroad 02/20/07 675 Toro Mill 08/16/83 760 Toro Mill 08/16/83 762 Toro Mill 08/16/83 770 Toro Mill 08/16/83 771 Toro Mill 08/16/83 778 Toro Mill 08/16/83" 780 Toro Mill 08/16/83 855 Toro Mill 08/16/83 858 Tom Mill 08/16/83 862 Toro Mill 08/16/83 865 Toro Mill 08/16/83 872 Toro Mill 08/16/83 898 Toro Mill 08/16/83 1423 Toro Old Town 02/03/87 875 Upham Railroad 02/03/87 750 Woodbridge Little Italy 10/02/2001 756 Woodbridge Little Italy 10/02/2001 762 Woodbrige Little Italy 10/02/2001 - 73 - �f1S City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Attachment 7 5.4 Master List of Historic Resources, updated March 24, 2010 *Serial Number: 0000 00 X Sequential National Register Rating Type of Structure Type of Structure Number I =Already placed on National Register R=Residential 2=Determined eligible for the National Register C=Commercial 3=Eligible for the National Register 0=Other 4=Potentially eligible for the National Register 5=Not eligible for the National Register.but locally significant Address Historic Name Zone District Serial No." 1451 ANDREWS ANDREWS ADOBE R-I-S 0001-03R 59 BENTON WAY J.J. DUNNE HOUSE R-1 0165-05R 148 BROAD BRAZIL HOUSE R-1 0002-04R 963 BROAD MANDERSCHEID HOUSE R-3-H Downtown 0003-04R 1345 BROAD ANDERSON HOUSE O-H Old Town 0004-04R 1411 BROAD MAIER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0005-04R 1426 BROAD DUTTON HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0006-04R 1435 BROAD MILLER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0007-04R 1445 BROAD FALKENSTEIN.HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0008-04R 1504 BROAD VETTERLINE HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0009-03R 1510 BROAD MCKENNON HOUSE R72-H Old Town 0010-04R 1516 BROAD RENETZKY HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 001 I-04R 1530 BROAD TUCKER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0012-04R 714 BUCHON MYRON ANGEL HOUSE , R-2-H Old Town 0013-OIR 726 BUCHON .-JESSIE WRIGHT MATERNITY HOME R-2-H Old Town 0014-04R 743 BUCHON '.'BRADBURY SANITARIUM R-2-H Old Town 0015-04R 745 BUCHON BRADBURY HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0016-04R 751 BUCHON KAISER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0017-04R 752 BUCHON STANTON HOUSE_ R-2-H Old Town 0018-04R 771 BUCHON BREW HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0019-04R 779 BUCHON UPHAM"HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0020-04R 785 BUCHON MARSHALL.HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0021-04R 793 BUCHON CROCKER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0022-03R 794 BUCHON FITZGERALD HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0023-03R 850 BUCHON` CLARK/NORTON HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0024-04R 860 BUCHON HOURIHAN HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0025-04R 890 BUCHON PAULSON HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0026-04R 896 BUCHON CROSSETT HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0027-04R 116 CHORRO MICHAEL C.HALPIN HOUSE R-1 0176-05R 375 CHORRO .CHRIS ANHOLM HOUSE R-1 0175-05R 868 CHORRO MANCILLA/FREITAS ADOBE R-4 0028-03R 964 CHORRO SAUERIADAMS ADOBE C-D-H Chinatown 0029-03R 1026 CHORRO WADE BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0100-05C 1029 CHORRO DUGHI BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0101-05C 1033 CHORRO WICKENDEN BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0102-05C 1306 CHORRO REGAN HOUSE 0 0030-05R 1318 CHORRO MAZZA HOUSE 0 0031-04R 1518 CHORRO BROOKS HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0032-03R 1546 CHORRO FLEUGER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0033-04R 1746 CHORRO ASTON HOUSE R-2 0034-05R - 74 - Pt'3 —Cg City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines attachment 7 June 2010 Address Historic Name Zone District Serial No. 1902 CHORRO BITTICK RESIDENCE R-2 0170-05R 1907 CHORRO FINNEY HOUSE R-2 0035-05R 1953 CHORRO OLIVER HOUSE R-2 0163-05R 466 DANA ROSA BUTRON ADOBE R-3-H Downtown 0036-03R 532 DANA ANDERSON HOUSE R-3-H Downtown 0037-04R 550 DANA BARNEBERG HOUSE O-H-PD Downtown 0038-04R 1500 ETO SOLOMON FOREMAN HOUSE R-1-PD 0166-05R 1119 GARDEN UNION HARDWARE BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0103-04C 1123 GARDEN SMITH BUILDING GD-H Downtown 0104-05C 1129 GARDEN LAIRD BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0105-05C 1130 GARDEN STOVER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0106-05C 1212 GARDEN GOLDTREE/MCCAFFREY HOUSE C-D 0039-04C 1105 GEORGE EDWARD F.BUSHNELL HOUSE R-2 0154-05R 2132 HARRIS WEILL HOUSE R-2 0040-04R 50 HIGUERA DIV.OF HIGHWAYS DIST. 5 OFF. PF 0156-03C 75 HIGUERA LOOMIS FEED CO. WAREHOUSE C-S-MU 0107-05C 236 HIGUERA H. H.WAITE PLANING MILL C-S-MU 0108-05C 570 HIGUERA GOLDEN STATE CREAMERY C-D Downtown 0109-05C 719 HIGUERA GREENFIELD BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0110-05C 726 HIGUERA KLUVER CIGAR FACTORY C-D-H Downtown 0111-03C 736 HIGUERA CARRISA BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0112-04C 740 HIGUERA VOLLMER GROCERY, C-D-H Downtown 0113-05C 767 HIGUERA BANK OF AMERICA BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0114-03C 777 HIGUERA DOTON BUILDING ' C-D-H Downtown 0115-03C 796141GUERA JOHNSON BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0116-05C 799 HIGUERA COMMERCIAL BANK`BUILDING` . C-D-H Downtown 0117-05C 842 HIGUERA ,WARDEN/TOWER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0118-04C 849 HIGUERA GOLDTREE BLOCK/HOTEL WINEMAN C-D-H Downtown 0119-05C 852 HIGUERA A..F.FITZGERALD BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0120-05C 856 HIGUERA _ SANDERCOCK TRANSFER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0120-05C 3897 50.HIGUERA LONG/BONETTI RANCH M-SP 0157-04R 1100 IRIS SOUTHERN PACIFIC WATER TOWER C/OS Railroad 0153-04C 461 ISLAY ERICKSON HOUSE R-2 0041-04R 463 ISLAY , 'FUMIGALLI HOUSE R-2 0042-05R 497 ISLAY VOLLMER HOUSE R-2 0043-05R 535 ISLAY �SANDERCOCKHOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0044-04R 591 ISLAY SANDERCOCK HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0045-05R 644 ISLAY DANA/PARSONS HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0046-05R 670 ISLAY FITZPATRICK HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0047-04R 687 ISLAY \ ERICKSON HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0048-03R 690 ISLAY KIMBALL HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0049-04R 790 ISLAY JACKSON HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0050-04R 1052 ISLAY KAUFMAN HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0174-05R 777 JOHNSON BUCKLEY HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0051-05R 1720 JOHNSON THE JUDGE'S HOUSE R-2 0052-03R 2030 JOHNSON OLD SLO HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOM R-2 0175-OSR 1019-23 LEFF POST HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0053-04R 1590 LIZZIE LA LOMA DE LA NOPALERA ADOBE R-1-SP 0158-04C 100 MADONNA MADONNA INN C-T,C-T-S 0121-04C 536 MARSH JACK HOUSE C-D 0054-030 547 MARSH KAETZEL HOUSE C-D 0055-04R 774 MARSH SNYDER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0122-04C - 75 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft h oric Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Address Historic Name Zone District Serial No.. 859 MARSH MASONIC TEMPLE C-D 0123-03C 893 MARSH U.S. POST OFFICE C-D 0124-05C 951 MARSH FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH C-D 0125-03C 981 MARSH FREDERICK HART BUILDING C-D 0125-03C 1117 MARSH ESQUAR HOUSE O 0056-04R 1129 MARSH RAMAGE HOUSE O 0057-04R 1135 MARSH SHIPMAN HOUSE O 0058-04R 1141 MARSH THE NURSE'S HOUSE O 0059-04R 1145 MARSH FAULKNER HOUSE O 0060-04R 1160 MARSH STOVER'S SANITARIUM O 0126-03C 1167 MARSH GRAVES HOUSE O 0061-05R 1305 MARSH REID HOUSE O 0062-05R 1266 MILL SHIPSEY HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0063-OIR 1306 MILL SMITH HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0064-04R 1323 MILL LAIRD HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0172-05R 1330 MILL MUSCIO HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0065-05R 1333 MILL BURCH HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0173-05R 1424 MILL MAINO HOUSE R-2 0066-05R 1460 MILL MUGLER HOUSE R-2 0067-04R 642 MONTEREY HAYS/LATTIMER ADOBE O-H Downtown 0068-03R 664 MONTEREY DR.GEORGE B.NICHOLS HOUSE O-H Downtown 0069-04R 696 MONTEREY CARNEGIE LIBRARY PF-H Downtown 0128-030 747 MONTEREY MURRAY ADOBE PF=H Downtown 0070-030 782 MONTEREY MISSION SAN LUIS OBISPO C-D-S-H Downtown 0127-030 848 MONTEREY SAUER BAKERY C-D-H Downtown 0129-05C 849 MONTEREY SINSHEIMER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0130-03C 868 MONTEREY MUZIO'S GROCERY C-D-H Downtown 0131-03C 955 MONTEREY ANDERSON HOTEL C-D-H Downtown 0132-05C 962 MONTEREY BRUNNER BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0133-05C 998 MONTEREY ANDREWS BUILDING C-D-H Downtown 0135-03C 1035 MONTEREY FREMONT THEATER C-D-H Downtown 0136-03C 1815 MONTEREY MONDAY CLUB C-T-S 0137-03C 2223 MONTEREY MILESTONE MOTEL INN C-T-S 0138-03C 1406 MORRO' SNYDER HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0071-04R 1511 MORRO MARTHA DUNLAP HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0167-05R 1624 MORRO BULLARD HOUSE R-3-11 Old Town 0072-04R 1636 MORRO BAKER HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0073-04R 1642 MORRO ALBERT HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0074-04R 991 NIPOMO HARMONY CREAMERY O-H Downtown 0139-05C 1204 NIPOMO PARSONS HOUSE C-D 0075-05R 1344 NIPOMO ST.STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH R-2-H Old Town 0141-030 1407 NIPOMO PATTON HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0076-04R 1428 NIPOMO ROGERS HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0077-05R 1446 NIPOMO NICHOLS HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0078-05R 978 OLIVE HERITAGE INN C-T 0159-05C 890 0SOS TEASS HOUSE O-H Downtown 0079-04R 976 0SOS COUNTY COURTHOUSE PF-H Downtown 0142-040 1301 0SOS FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH O 0143-030 1429 0SOS FRANK CAMPBELL MITCHELL HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0171-05R 1443 0SOS M.F.AVILA HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0080-03R 1700 0SOS ALLEN HOUSE R-3-11 Old Town 0081-05R 1716 OSOS HAGEMAN SANITARIUM R-3-H Old Town 0082-04R - 76 City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — :attachment 7 June 2010 Address Historic Name Zone District Serial No. 1815 OSOS PARK/REIDY HOTEL C-R-S-H Railroad 0144-05C 863 PACIFIC ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH O 0145-04C 1106 PACIFIC KUNDERT MEDICAL BUILDING O 0146-03C 1185 PACIFIC DALLIDET ADOBE O 0083-030 800 PALM AH LOUIS STORE C-D-H Chinatown 0147-03C 990 PALM SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY HALL PF-H Downtown 0164-050 1118 PALM GREGG HOUSE O 0175-05R 1144 PALM PAYNE HOUSE O 0084-03R 1305 PALM RIGHETTI APARTMENTS R-3-H, Mill Street 0085-05R 1314 PALM RIGHETTI HOUSE R-3-H Mill Street 0086-05R 71 PALOMAR SANDFORD HOUSE R-4 0087-05R 1127 PEACH J. MAINO HOUSE R-2-1-1 Mill Street 0088-05C 1128 PEACH MAINO/RIGHETTI HOUSE R-2-H Mill Street 0089-04R 280 PISMO OLD GAS WORKS C-S 0148-04C 559 PISMO BIDDLE HOUSE R-3-H Old Town 0090-03R 649 PISMO MCMANUS HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0091-03R 671 PISMO LEWIN HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0092-05R 676 PISMO GREENFIELD HOUSE O-H Old Town 0093-04R 750 PISMO OLD FIRE STATION BUILDING 0 0140-03C 1116 PISMO VOLLMER HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0094-04R 1123 PISMO THORNE HOUSE R-2-H Old Town 0095-05R 1341 PURPLE SAGE RODRIGUEZ ADOBE R-1-PD 0160-03C 1011 RAILROAD SOUTHERN PACIFIC DEPOT C-S-S-H Railroad 0149-04C 1021 RAILROAD SP TRANSPORTATION CO.BLDG. C-S-S-H Railroad 0168-02C 1335 ROUNDHOUSE SOUTHERN PACIFIC ROUNDHOUSE C-S-S-H Railroad 0169-02C 1499 SAN LUIS DRIVE SLO HIGH SCHOOL GYMNASIUM PF 0155-05C 1703 SANTA BARBARA CALL HOTEL R-3-H Railroad 0096-05R 1717 SANTA BARBARA WILLIAM M.DUFF HOUSE R-3-H Railroad 0161-05R 1725 SANTA BARBARA" ALEXANDER GALEWSKI HOUSE R-3-1-1 Railroad 0162-05R 1763 SANTA BARBARA TRIBUNE-REPUBLIC BUILDING R-3-H Railroad 0152-04R 1880 SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL COMMERCIAL COMPANY C-R-S-H Railroad 0151-04C 1940 SANTA BARBARA SOUTHERN PACIFIC WAREHOUSE C-S-S-H Railroad 0150-04C 2243 SANTA YNEZ FAULSTICH HOUSE R-1 0134-05R 1445 SANTA ROSA KINDERGARTEN SCHOOL PF-H Old Town 0097-040 1531 SANTA ROSA ADRIANCE COURT R-3-H Old Town 0098-05R 843 UPHAM CHAPEK HOUSE R-2 0099-05R - 77 - I \ City of San Luis Obispo -Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines J Attachment 7 June 2010 5.5 Definitions For the purposes of this chapter, certain terms, words and their derivatives shall be defined as specified herein; 1. Accessory Structure: a structure which is subordinate or incidental and directly related to a permitted use or structure on the same parcel. "Accessory structures" that include habitable space, as defined by the California Building Code, shall be no larger than 450 square feet. (Ord. 941-1(part), 1982: prior code — 9204.11 (part)) "Accessory structures" are located on the same parcel and are related to the primary structure but are subordinate or incidental, but may include structures that have achieved historic significance in their own right, as determined by the Director, Committee or Council. (see"primary structure") 2. Adjacent: located on property which abuts the subject property on at least one point of the property line, on the same property, or located on property directly across right-of-.way from subject property and able to viewed concurrently. 3. Adverse Effects: effects, impacts or actions that are detrimental or potentially detrimental to a historic resource's condition, architectural or historical integrity. 4 Alteration: any change, repair, replacement, modification, or new construction to: (1) the exterior of an historic resource or adjacent building, '(2) the exterior and interior structural elements which support the exterior walls, roof, or exterior elements of the historic resource or adjacent building, (3) other construction on a>lot, or (4) Character Defining Features of the interior of a historic resource, unless the interior is exempt from historic review by the Cultural Heritage Committee. "Alteration" does not include ordinary landscape maintenance unless the landscaping is identified as.significant at the time a property is listed, receives historic"H"zoning, or is identified in an adopted historic preservation report. 5. Archaeological Site: those areas where archaeological resources are present and may be larger or smaller than the project site. An archaeological site may include prehistoric Native American archaeological site, Historic archaeological sites; sites or natural landscapes associated with important human events; and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes. 6. ARC: the Architectural Review Commission as appointed by the City Council. 7. California Register: California Register of Historical Resources defined in California PRC 5024.1 and in CCR Title 14 Chap 11.5, Sec 4850 et seq. as it may be amended. 8. CHC: the Cultural Heritage Committee as appointed by the City Council. 9. Character Defining Features: as outlined in the U.S. Department of the Interior's National Register Bulletin 15 and Preservation Brief 17: "How to Identify Character Defining Features", the architectural character and general composition of a resource, including, but not limited to, type and texture of building material; type, design, and character of all windows, doors, stairs, - 78 - P� fG —�U I I � City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 porches, railings, molding and other appurtenant elements; and fenestration, ornamental detailing, elements of craftsmanship, finishes, etc. 10. City:the City of San Luis Obispo. 11. Community Design Guidelines: the most recent version of the City's Community Design Guidelines as adopted and amended from time to time: 12. Contributing Resource: Buildings or other resources at least 50.years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole shall be designated Contributing Resources. They need not be located in a historic district, but should be visible to the public.. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old; but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described herein may be designated as a Contributing resource. 13.Council: the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo: 14. Cultural Resource: any prehistoric.or historic district,=site;landscape, building, structure, or object included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or'National historic designation, including artifacts, records, and material remains related to such a property or resource. 15. Demolition: for the purpose of these guidelines;;" _demolition" refers to any act or failure to act that destroys, removes, or relocates, in whole or"part a historical resource such that its historic or architectural character.and significance are materially altered. 16. Deterioration: the'significant worsening of a structure's condition, architectural or historic integrity, due to lack of maintenazice;`organisms,neglect, weathering and other natural forces. 17. Director: the Director of the Community Development Department, or another person authorized by the Director to act on his or her behalf. 18. Disaster: "Disaster" shall include fire, flood, earthquake, landslide, subsidence, tsunami, acts of war.or civil unrest, or other catastrophic event as declared by the Council, the Governor of the State of California or the President of the United States. 19. Feasible: capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account cultural, economic, environmental, historic, legal, social and technological factors. 20. Historic District/Historical Preservation District: areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, where historic properties help define the area or neighborhood's unique architectural, cultural, and historic character or sense of place. Historic districts may be, - 79 - T� 15� �' 9 � I City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachm1ant 7 June 2010 delineated on the official zoning map as Historic (H) overlay zone under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.54. 21. Historic Building Code: the most recent version of the California Historical Building Code, Title 25, Part, 8, as defined in Sections 18950 to 18961 of Division 12, Part 2.7 of Health and Safety Code (H&SC), a part of California State law. Its purpose is to provide regulations and standards for the rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related reconstruction) or relocation as applicable to all historical buildings, structures and properties deemed of importance to the history, architecture, or culture of an area by an appropriate local or state governmental jurisdiction. 22. Historic Context: Historic context are those patterns, themes or trends in history by which a specific occurrence, property, or site is understood and its meaning and significance is made clear. 23. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: the most recent version of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, as adopted from time to time. 24. Historic Preservation Report. a document which describes preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction measures for a historic resource, based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic,Properties, and which includes standards and guidelines for recommended treatments for preserving the resource. A historic preservation report shall require approval'by the CHC and the approval shall remain in effect for a period of at least three years from the approval,date. The Director or on referral from the Director, the CHC may extend or re-adopt an approved program for a period of up to ten years. 25. Historic Property: a property, including land"and buildings, which possesses aesthetic, architectural, cultural; historic'or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation.. 26. Historic Resource: any building, site; improvement, area or object of aesthetic, architectural, cultiiral,,historic or scientific 'significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation. 27. Historic Status:historic'designation of a listed resource or property as approved by Council. 28. Improvement: ariybuilding, structure, fence, gate, landscaping, hardscaping, wall, work of art, or other object constituting a physical feature of real property or any part of such feature. 29. Inappropriate Alteration: alterations to historic resources which violate these provisions and/or the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 30. Integrity, Architectural or Historical: the ability of a property, structure, site, building, improvement or natural feature to convey its identity and authenticity, including but not limited r City of San Luis Obispo- Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines ` Attachmeent 7 June 2010 to its original location, period(s) of construction, setting; scale, design, materials, detailing, workmanship, human values, uses and association. 31. Inventory of Historic Resources: the list of historically designated resourcesand properties consisting of Master List and Contributing Properties List Historic Resources, and any properties, objects, sites, gardens, sacred places and resources subsequently added to the inventory as determined to meet criteria outlined herein and approved by the City Council.. 32. Listed Resource: properties and resources included in the Inventory"of Historic Resources. 33. Massing: the spatial relationships, arrangement and organization of a building's physical bulk or volume. 34. Master List Resource: designation which may be applied to the most unique and important historic properties and resources meeting criteria outlined herein. 35. Minor Alteration. Any structural or exterior change to a historic resource which the Director determines to be consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and other applicable standards. 36. Modern Contributing Resources: designation which may be applied to properties and resources which are less than 50 years old, but which exemplify or include significant works of architecture or craftsmanship. 37. National Register of Historic Places: the official inventory of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, engineering, archaeology and culture whichis maintained by the Secretary of the Interior under the authority of the Historic Sites Act of 1935'and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. 38. Neglect: the lack of maintenance, repair or protection from natural elements or vandalism of a listed property, resource, site 'or 'structure, whether intentional or not, which results in significant deterioration, as determined by the Director, CHC or City Council based on visual and physical evidence. 39. Non-Contributing Resource: designation which may be applied to properties and resources in historic districts which are typically less than 50 years old and do not support the prevailing historic character of the district or other listing criteria as outlined herein. 40. Preservation: the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain a historic site, building or other structure's historically significant existing form, integrity, and materials through stabilization, repair and maintenance.. 41. Property Owner: the person or entity holding fee title interest or legal custody and control of a property. - 81 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines — Attachment 7 June 2010 42. Primary Structure: the most important building or other structural feature on a parcel in terms of size, scale, architectural or Historical significance, as determined by the Committee. 43. Qualified Professional. an individual meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61 Appendix A) in history, architectural history, historic architecture and other designated categories, or an individual determined by the CHC to have the qualifications generally equivalent to the above standards based on demonstrated experience. 44. Reconstruction: the act or process of recreating the features, form and detailing of a non- surviving building or portion of building, structure, object, landscape, or site for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. 45. Rehabilitation: the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its architectural, cultural, or historic values. 46. Relocation: removal of a resource from its original site and its re-establishment at another location in essentially the same form, appearance and architectural detailing. 47. Remodel: Alteration of a structure which-retains at least 75 percent of the original building framework, roof and exterior bearing walls and cladding, in total, and which reusesthe original building materials to the maximum extent possible. 48. Responsible party: any person,business, company or entity,and the parent or legal guardian of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, who has done any act for which an administrative penalty may be imposed. 49. Restoration the act or process.of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. 50. Scale:the proportions of architectural design that relate to human size or other relative size measure. 51. Secretary of the Interior's Standards: the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic' Properties as published by the U.S. Department of the Interior and as amended from time to time. 52. Setting: the physical area, environment or neighborhood in which a resource is located. 53. Sensitive Site: a site determined by the Community Development Director, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission or Council, upon recommendation of the Cultural Heritage Committee, to have special characteristics, constraints or community value such as: historic significance, historic context, creek side location or visual prominence; - 82 - PN 5 "0,i ;. City of San Luis Obispo -Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Adarn fr'ant 7 June 2010 requiring more detailed development review than would otherwise be required for other similarly zoned lots. 55. Site: as used in these guidelines, the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. In general terms, site also includes the landscape surrounding a building or other structure and contained within an individual parcel or contiguous parcels of land. 56. Siting: the placement of structures and improvements on a property or site. 57. Stabilization: the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weather resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property while maintaining the essential form as it exists at present. 58. Statement of Historic Significance: A statement of significance is an. analysis-based argument or explanation of why a resource is important within its historic context. It explains how the resource meets the eligibility criteria and integrity thresholds as established by local, state or federal govemment. 59. Structure: as used here, "structure"' includes anything assembled or constructed on the ground, or attached to anything with a foundation on the ground, including walls, fences, buildings, signs,bridges, monuments, and similar features. 60. Survey: a systematic process for identifying and evaluating a community's resources using established criteria. 'Survey" may also refer to the documentation resulting from a survey project. 61. Threatened Resource: properties or resources at risk of loss of architectural, cultural or historic value due to physical alteration, relocation or demolition. 62. Zoning Code: Title 17 of the City s Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. - 83 - City of . 1 Luis Obispo Draft historic • • Guidelines June 2010 )r b r Historic Mission,San Luis Obispo de Tolosa, 1772 � • r `� aPa �F'iS' •y '. T Y x ,1. �-�- �E �:2et•' -..�� ''" ars i - 84 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines June 2010 Attachment 7 5.6 Works Cited and Information Links Angel, Myron Ed..History of San Luis Obispo County, of Its Prominent Men and Pioneers. Fresno: Valley Publishers, 1979. Originally published Oakland: Thompson and West, 1883. Bowsher, Alice Meriwether. Design Review in Historic Districts. Washington D.C.: Preservation Press, 1975. California Office of Historic Preservation. "Technical Assistance Bulletin#14 Drafting Effective Historic Preservation Ordinances." Sacramento, June 2005. Carr, Paula Juelke. "Proposal for Chinatown Historic District." July 1995. Conway, Thor. "Kozak Parking Lot Project, An Archaeological Investigation of Historic SLO, CA." San Luis Obispo: City of San Luis Obispo, 1995. Dart, Louisiana Clayton, Vignettes of History in San Luis,Obispo County. San Luis Obispo: Mission Federal Savings, 1978. Friedman, Donald. Historical Building Construction: Design Material and Technology. New York: Norton, 1995. Hall-Patton, Mark P. Memories of the Land: Placenames of San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo; EZ Nature,Books .,1994. Harth, Stan, Liz Krieger, Dan Krieger,editors._War Comes to the Middle Kingdom: California's Central_Coast Enters World War II. San Luis Obispo: EZ books, 1991. Hedman,',Richard and Andrew Jaszewski. Fundamentals of Urban Design. Washington D.C.: Planners Press, 1984. Jennings, Janand Herbert Gottfried. American Vernacular Interior Architecture 1870-1940. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988. Knighton, Petree A. A Path to Parity: Adopting a Historic Preservation Element to the General Plan. Berkeley.'University of California Berkeley, 2002. Lovell, Margaret. Historical Resources Survey II Completion Report. City of San Luis Obispo, completed January 1992. McAlester, Virginia and Lee McAlester. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Knopf, 2006. - 85 - City of San Luis Obispo-Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines attach rr,eot- 7 June 2010 McKeen, Rose. Parade Along the Creek: Memories of Growing Up with San Luis Obispo. San Luis Obispo: Central Coast, 1988. Moms, Marya. Innovative Tools for Historic Preservation. Washington D.C.: The National Trust; 1992. Nelson, Mane Preservation Planning and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards: Historic Contexts and Surveys. Sacramento: California Office of Historic Preservation, 14th September 2009. Roche, John J. "A Historical and Architectural Survey of the Central Business District of San Luis Obispo." City and Regional Planning Department and the School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo. March 1983. San Luis Obispo Fire Department: Souvenir of San Luis Obispo. San Luis Obispo.: Tigner, 1904. San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune. San Luis Obispo Tribune Souvenir Railroad Edition, May Yh, 1894. San Luis Obispo: Library Associates, 1994. Secretary of the Interior. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. US Department of the Interior 1995. Schmickle, Bill. The Politics of Historic Districts: A Primer for Grassroots Preservation. Lanham: Altamira Press, 2007. Stipe, Robert E. ed. A Richer Heritage: Historic Preservation in the Twenty-first Century. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. Tonello, Greg. Architecture of San Luis Obispo the Historic Photographs. San Luis Obispo; School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University California, San Luis Obispo, 1982. U.S. Department of the Interior. National Parks Service. National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: William Shipsey House, prepared by Betsy Bertrando. Sacramento, 2009. i U.S. Department of the Interior. National Parks Service. Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Washington D.C., 2002 Wall, Richard. "A Supplemental Survey of the Cultural Resources of San Luis Obispo, California." Masters Thesis, California State University, Dominguez Hills, 1986. - 86 - City of San Luis Obispo- Draft historic Preservation Program Guidelines Attachment 7 June 2010 Winslow, Carleton. Discovering San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo; School of Architecture and Environmental Design, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1972. Winter and Company. "Defining Neighborhood Design Character and Developing Design Guidelines," in Guiding History: A Process for Creating Historic District Guidelines, 1996. 5.7 Council Resolution (to be added) G:\CDD Documents\Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines\Working Drafts\Historicprese"ationgLtidelinesupdate062810chcdiuft(working).doc - 87 - Attachment 8 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. (2010 Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ADDING NEW CHAPTER 14.01 TO TITLE 14 (RESERVED) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TO INCORPORATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE PROVISIONS (GPI 72-09) WHEREAS, the public hearings were conducted by the Cultural Heritage Committee of the City of San Luis Obispo on January 25`h, February 22°d, March 8th, March 22', April 26`h, May 11 tn, May 24th, June 28th 2010 and by the Architectural Review Commission on May 17`h 2010; and WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee took public testimony and modified text of the proposed documents in response to that testimony prior to making a final recommendation to City Council on June 28, 2010; and WHEREAS, City staff hosted an informational workshop on August 26, 2010 to garner additional public input and testimony and has made proposed edits to the documents in response; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on September 21, 2010, for the purpose of considering Application GPI 72-09; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed and considered the exemption from environmental review for the project; and WHEREAS, the Council has duly considered all evidence, including the recommendation of the Cultural Heritage Committee, testimony of interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed text amendment is consistent with and implements the General Plan, and other applicable City ordinances; BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. Council concurs with the Director's determination that the proposed Historic Preservation Program Guidelines update is Categorically Exempt from environmental review (Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment). It consists of an action by a regulatory agency as Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 2 authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment. SECTION 2. Findings. The City Council makes the following findings: 1. The proposed Ordinance fulfills program 3.6.10 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan which indicates that the City will implement recommendations of the Cultural Heritage Committee's "whitepaper' including adoption of a Historic Preservation Ordinance. 2. The proposed Ordinance meets program 3.6.10 of the Conservation and Open Space Element of the General Plan which indicates the City will be prepared to assess the condition of historic buildings that may be damaged by disasters and to foster their restoration whenever feasible because it includes post-disaster provisions. 3. The proposed Ordinance will allow the City to be eligible to become a Certified Local Government—a state-implemented program that encourages local governments to include consideration of historic resources in planning decisions and which can provide the City with tools, technical training and access to grants to implement historic preservation activities. 4. The proposed ordinance will define actions subject to Cultural Heritage Committee review, roles and process, post disaster response and enforcement ability. The proposed ordinance updates historic resource eligibility criteria and brings the criteria into alignment with the California Register Criteria. 5. The proposed ordinance is exempt from environmental review under Section 15308 because it consists of an action by a regulatory agency to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment. SECTION 3. Action. Chapter 14.01 of Title 14 (Reserved) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows: Title 14: Community Preservation Chapter 14.01 Historic Preservation Ordinance Sections: 14.01.005 Established. 14.01.010 Findings and purpose. Pis-a4 �' -- ' Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 3 14.01.020 Cultural Heritage Committee. 14.01.030 Duties. 14.01.040 Actions subject to Cultural Heritage Committee review. 14.01.045 Community Director role. 14.01.050 Cultural heritage review procedures. 14.01.060 Post-disaster historic preservation. 14.01.070 Non-compliance with provisions. 14.01.080 Historic Preservation Fund 14.01.090 Appeals. 14.01.100 Definitions. 14.01.005 Established. A) Cultural Heritage Committee established. There is hereby established the San Luis Obispo Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC), consisting of seven members appointed by the Council. B) Committee membership. The Committee shall include, whenever possible, a person knowledgeable in local history, a person with training or experience in architectural rehabilitation or restoration, a person with knowledge of architecture or architectural history, and a person knowledgeable in archaeology. 14.01.010 Findings and Purpose. 14.01.011 Findings. The Council hereby finds that: The City of San Luis Obispo has a distinctive physical character and rich history that are reflected in its many cultural resources, such as historic structures and sites. These irreplaceable resources are important to the community's economic vitality, quality of life, and sense of place and need protection from deterioration, damage, and inappropriate alteration or demolition. 14.01.012 Purpose. The broad purpose of this ordinance is to promote the public health, safety and welfare through the identification, protection, enhancement and preservation of those properties, structures, sites, artifacts and other cultural resources that represent distinctive elements of San Luis Obispo's cultural, educational, social, economic, political and architectural history. Specifically, this ordinance sets forth regulations and procedures to: A. Identify, protect, preserve, and promote the continuing use and upkeep of San Luis Obispo's historic structures, sites and districts. 0Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 4 B. Foster the retention and restoration of historic buildings and other cultural resources that promote tourism, economic vitality, sense of place, and diversity. C. Encourage private stewardship of historic buildings and other cultural resources through incentives where possible: D. Implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. E. Promote the conservation of valuable material and embodied energy in historic structures through their continued use, restoration and repair-, and on-going maintenance of historic resources. F. Promote the knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the City's distinctive character, cultural resources and history. G. Establish the procedures and significance criteria to be applied when evaluating development project effects on historic resources. H. Fulfill the City's responsibilities as a Certified Local Government under State and Federal regulations and for Federal Section 106 reviews. 14.01.020 Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC). 14.01.021 Committee membership and terms. The Cultural Heritage Committee (the `-`CHC" or "Committee") shall be appointed by the City Council ("Council") and consist of seven members who are appointed for terms of up to four years which shall commence immediately upon appointment by the Council. 14.01.022 Removal and reappointment. Committee members shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and may be reappointed, provided that no appointee shall serve more than two consecutive full terms (eight years). Appointment to a partial term of office following an unscheduled vacancy shall not preclude the appointee from serving two consecutive full terms following completion of the partial term; provided that the partial term is less than two years. 14.01.030 Duties. The CHC shall: A. Establish and maintain historic and cultural resource preservation standards and guidelines for the use by persons planning development projects subject. to Cultural Heritage Committee PtAco C)�� Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 5 review, and for guiding City and property owner decisions regarding cultural resources in San Luis Obispo. B. Identify and recommend to the Council those properties, areas, sites, buildings, structures or other features having significant historical, cultural, architectural, community, scientific or aesthetic value to the citizens of San Luis Obispo. C. Maintain and update the Master and Contributing Properties Lists of Historic Resources, and Historic Property and Archaeological Site Inventories. D. Review and make recommendations to decision makers on actions that may affect significant archaeological, cultural or historic resources. E. Advise and assist property owners, developers and staff in the application of architectural, historic and cultural preservation standards and guidelines to projects and approvals involving historic sites, districts and structures. F. Collect and consolidate information about cultural resources and promote, participate in, or sponsor educational and interpretive programs which foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources. G. Provide advice and guidance on the restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping and maintenance of listed resources, and properties within historic preservation districts. H. Administer incentive programs approved by the Council that are directed at preserving and maintaining cultural resources. I. Assist property owners with the preparation of local, state and federal historic nominations to enable property owners to utilize preservation incentives, including the.Mills Act and federal tax incentives such as rehabilitation tax credits. J. Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Body Handbook and perform other duties as assigned by Council. 14.01.040 Actions Subject to Cultural Heritage Committee Review. The Committee shall review and make recommendations on the following actions: A. Changes to the Inventory of Historic Resources. B. Changes to historic districts and applications to establish new historic districts. �}� 5 - ate Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 6 C. Statements of historic significance and historic inventories for existing and proposed historic districts. D. New construction, additions or alterations located in or adjacent to historic districts, or at historically listed properties, or sensitive archaeological sites. E. Applications to demolish or relocate listed resources or structures. F Projects and actions referred to the Committee by the Community Development Director ("Director"), Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission, or Council. G. Actions of public agencies that may affect historic or cultural resources within the City. 14.01.045 Community Development Director Role The CHC is assisted by staff of the Community Development Department. The Community Development Director ("Director") is responsible for interpreting and implementing this ordinance and helping the CHC carry out its duties. Notwithstanding Section 14.01.040 of this ordinance, the Director may determine that CHC review is not required for actions or projects that: 1) do not adversely affect historic resources, or 2) are consistent with this ordinance and the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and no public purpose would be served by requiring CHC review. 14.01.050 Cultural Heritage Review Procedures. The Committee shall prepare and maintain Historic and Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines that implement this ordinance and set forth the guidelines for cultural heritage review. These documents shall require Council approval. A record copy of the guidelines shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in the Community Development Department. Copies shall be available on the City's website and printed versions will be available at cost. 14.01.051 Resource Designation The following classifications are used to designate historic resources and properties. The primary categories of historic significance are "Master List" and "Contributing" properties. The Master List includes the City's most important historic resources in terms of age, architectural or historical significance, rarity, or association with important persons or events in the City's past. Contributing properties include those properties that by virtue of their age, design and appearance, contribute to and embody the historic character of the historic district or neighborhood in which they are located. Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 7 A. Master List Resources. The most unique and important resources and properties meeting one or more of the criteria outlined in Section 14.01.053. B. Contributing Resources. Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole. They need not be located in a historic district, but should be visible to the public. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described in Section 14.01.053 may be designated as a Contributing Resource. C. Non-Contributing. Buildings, properties and other features in historic districts which are less than 50 years old, have not retained their original architectural character, or which do not support the prevailing historic character of the district. D. Threatened Structures. Structures or features at imminent risk of alteration, removal or relocation, or loss of historic significance through neglect. The Director or CHC may designate Threatened Structures, based on the criteria in Section 14.01.053, for a period not to exceed six months to allow sufficient time to evaluate the significance of the structure. During this period, demolition will not be allowed. 14.01.052 Listing Procedures for Historic Resources A. Application for historic listing. The property owner may initiate the process for a resource to be added to the Master or Contributing List of Historic resources by submitting a completed application to the Community Development Department ("Department'), accompanied by all available information documenting the historic significance and architectural character of the resource.' This process can also be initiated by the CHC, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council. B. Review process. The CHC shall review applications for historic listing. If the CHC determines an application may meet eligibility criteria for historic listing, a public hearing will be scheduled by the Department and the Director shall provide notification as required by City standards. At the public hearing, or in no case more than 60 days from the hearing date, the CHC shall forward a recommendation on the application to the City Council. The City Council will take an action on the application to add or not add the resource to the Master or Contributing List of Historic Resources. The decision of the City Council is final. C. Removal from historic listing. It is the general intention of the City to not remove a property from historic listing. Council may, however, rezone a property to remove Historic Overlay Zoning, or remove the property from historic listing if the structure on the property no longer meets eligibility criteria for listing, following the process for listing set forth herein. ppg �qt�4 J . Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 8 14.01.053. Evaluation Criteria for Historic Resource Listing When determining if a property should be designated as a listed Historic or Cultural Resource, the CHC and City Council shall consider this ordinance and State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO") standards. In order to be eligible for designation the resource shall exhibit a high level of historic integrity, be at least.fifty (50) years old (less than 50 if it can be demonstrated that enough time has passed to understand its historical importance) and satisfy at least one of the following criteria: A. Architectural Criteria: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values.- (a) Style: Describes the form of a building, such as size, structural shape and details within that form (e.g. arrangement of windows and doors, ornamentation, etc.). Building style will be evaluated as a measure of: (i) The relative purity of a traditional style; (ii) Rarity of existence at any time in the locale; and/or current rarity although the structure reflects a once popular style; (iii) Traditional, vernacular and/or eclectic influences that represent a particular social milieu and period of the community; and/or the uniqueness of hybrid. styles and how these styles are put together. (b) Design: Describes the architectural concept of a structure and the quality of artistic merit and craftsmanship of the individual parts. Reflects how well a particular style or combination of styles are expressed through compatibility and detailing of elements. Also, suggests degree to which the designer (e.g., carpenter-builder) accurately interpreted and conveyed the style(s). Building design will be evaluated as a measure of (i) Notable attractiveness with aesthetic appeal because of its artistic merit, details and craftsmanship(even if not necessarily unique); (ii) An expression of interesting details and eclecticism among carpenter-builders, although the craftsmanship and artistic quality may not be superior. (c) Architect: Describes the professional (an individual or firm) directly responsible for the building design and plans of the structure. The architect will be evaluated as a reference to: Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 9 (i) A notable architect (e.g., Wright, Morgan), including architects who made significant contributions to the state or region, or an architect whose work influenced development of the city, state or nation. (ii) An architect who, in terms of craftsmanship, made significant contributions to San Luis Obispo (e.g., Abrahams who, according to local sources, designed the house at 810 Osos - Frank Avila's father's home-built between 1927—30). (d) Sign: A sign which contributes to the unique architectural or historic character of a building, site or historic district may be designated as a historic sign. Signs that meet at least one of the following criteria may be designated historic: i) The sign is exemplary of technology, craftsmanship or design of the period when it was constructed, uses historic sign materials and means of illumination, and is not significantly altered from its historic period. Historic sign materials shall include metal or wood facings, or paint directly on the facade of a building. Historic means of illumination shall include incandescent light fixtures or neon tubing on the exterior of the sign. If the sign has been altered, it must be restorable to its historic function and appearance. ii) The sign is well integrated with the site and/or architecture of the building. iii) A sign not meeting either criterion may be considered for inclusion in the inventory if it demonstrates extraordinary aesthetic quality, creativity, or innovation. B. Historic Criteria (a) History— Person: Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history. Historic person will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which a person or group was: (i) Significant to the community as a public leader(e.g., mayor, congress member, etc.) or for his or her fame and outstanding recognition - locally, regionally, or nationally. (ii) Significant to the community as a public servant or person—who made early, unique, or outstanding contributions to the community, important local affairs or institutions (e.g., council members, educators, medical professionals, clergymen, railroad officials). (b) History— Event: Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Historic event will be evaluated as a measure of 1A 5 Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 10 (i) A landmark, famous, or first-of-its-kind event for the city - regardless of whether the impact of the event spread beyond the city. (ii) A relatively unique, important or interesting contribution to the city (e.g., the Ah Louis Store as the center for Chinese-American cultural activities in early San Luis Obispo history). (c) History-Context: Associated with and also a prime illustration of predominant patterns of political, social, economic, cultural, medical; educational, governmental, military, industrial, or religious history. Historic context will be evaluated as a measure of the degree to which it reflects: (i) Early, first, or major patterns of local history, regardless of whether the historic effects go beyond the city level, that are intimately connected with the building (e.g., County Museum). (ii) Secondary patterns of local history but closely associated with the building (e.g., Park Hotel). C. Integrity: Authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Integrity will be evaluated by a measure of: (a) Whether or not a structure occupies its original site and/or whether or not the original foundation has been changed, if known. (b) The degree to which the structure has maintained enough of its historic character or appearance to be recognizable as an historic resource and to convey the reason(s) for its significance. (c) The degree to which the resource has retained its design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. 14.01.054 Historic Gardens, Site Features, and Other Cultural Resources A. Historic Site and landscape features. Historic gardens, site features and improvements, accessory structures, signs, Native American Sacred Places, cultural landscapes and areas or objects of archaeological, architectural, cultural or historic significance not part of a designated property may be added to the Inventory of Historic Resources through CHC review as specified herein.. J Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 11 B. Cultural Resources on public property. Cultural and historic features on public property, such as Bishop's Peak granite walls and curbing, sidewalk•embossing, ornamental manhole covers and hitching posts, may be added to the Inventory of Historic Resources through CHC review as specified herein. 14.01.055 Historic District Designation, Purpose and Application A. Historic (H) District designation. All properties within historic districts shall be designated by an "H" zoning, Properties zoned"H" shall be subject to the provisions and standards as provided in Ordinance 17.54 of the Municipal Code. B. Purposes of Historic Districts. The purposes of historic districts and H zone designation are to: (a) Implement cultural resource preservation policies of the General Plan, the preservation provisions of adopted area plans, the Historic Preservation and Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, and (b) Identify and preserve definable, unified geographical entities that possess a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development; (c) Implement historic preservation provisions of adopted area and neighborhood improvement plans; (d) Enhance and preserve the setting of historic resources so that surrounding land uses and structures do not detract from the historic or architectural integrity of designated historic resources and districts; and (e).Promote the public understanding and appreciation of historic resources. C. Eligibility for incentives. Properties designated as Historic Preservation (H) shall be eligible for preservation incentive and benefit programs as established herein, in the Guidelines and other local, state and federal programs. D. Where applied. The (H) designation may be applied to areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, or where historic properties help define an area or neighborhood's unique architectural and historic character or sense of place. E. "H" district combined. A Historic Preservation Overlay District (H) may be combined with any zoning district, and shall be shown by adding an "H" to the base zone designation. H district fA S -- 3�c � Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 12 boundaries shall be drawn to follow property lines or right-of-way lines, and as set forth in the Zoning Regulations. F. Statement of historic significance. A Historic (H) designation shall include a statement of historic significance as described herein, and be prepared by a qualified professional, as listed in the City's List of Qualified Historians. 14.01.056 Process for Establishing or Amending Historic Districts: A. Initiating or amending Historic Districts. Any person may initiate the process to establish or alter the boundaries of a historic district. The process can also be initiated by the CHC, ARC, Planning Commission or City Council. B. Application. An application to establish or alter the boundaries of a Historic Preservation District shall be submitted to the Department. The application shall meet the requirements for rezoning as described in the Zoning Regulations. The application and supporting information and plans shall be submitted to the Department and shall include: . (a) A map (8-1/2" x 11") from the official zoning map, with the area to be changed shaded or outlined in a heavy, black line, with the proposed area to be changed clearly labeled, and (b) Information showing how the application meets the criteria to establish or alter a historic district designation. C. Review. The CHC shall review the application and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall review the CHC recommendation and rezoning application and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall review the application and the recommendations of the CHC and Planning Commission, and approve or disapprove the application. The CHC, Planning Commission and the City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the application and the notice of such hearings shall be completed as provided in the City's Notification Procedures. D. Review criteria. When considering a Historic Preservation District application, the reviewing body shall consider the following criteria: (a) Environmental Design Continuity: Describes the inter-relationship of structures and their relationship to a common-environment;Refers to the continuity, spatial relationship, and visual character of a street, neighborhood, or area. Environmental design continuity is comprised of: Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 13 (i) Symbolic importance to the community of a key structure in the area_and the degree to which it serves as a conspicuous and pivotal landmark (e.g., easily accessible to the public, helps to establish a sense of time and place); or (ii) Compatibility of structures with neighboring structures in their setting on the basis of period, style (form, height, roof lines), design elements, landscapes, and natural features; and how these combine together to create an integral cultural, historic, or stylistic setting; or (iii) Similarity to and/or compatibility of structures over 50 years of age which, collectively, combine to form a geographically definable area with its own distinctive character; and (b) Whether the proposed district contains structures which meet criteria for inclusion on the City's List of Historic Resources. 14.01.057 Historic District Documentation: A. Documentation required. Statements of Historic Significance, as described herein, shall be adopted by the CHC at an advertised public hearing prior to recommending designation of a historic district. Designation of a historic district shall require rezoning with an "H" overlay zone, as described in Zoning Regulations (Ch. 17, SLOMC). Statements of historic significance shall be reviewed by the CHC at an advertised public hearing. Statements associated with an application to modify an existing district shall be adopted following the same public hearing and notification requirements. B. Contents. Statements of Historic Significance shall include, but not be limited to the following; (a)A visual and written description of the district's boundaries. (b) A description of the district's architectural and historic character. (c) A description of the district's architectural, historic, and cultural resources and significance, including a historic survey documenting the period of significance and how historic properties meet adopted local, state and where applicable, federal criteria for historic listing. (d) Preservation goals and concerns for the district including but not limited to; i) Identification of preservation priorities, important features, goals and objectives, and ii) Identification of prominent or unique obstacles to preservation, and iii) Identification of historic land use policies and goals for future land use, and �N� 'c�r3o Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 14 iv) Special considerations for development review of projects both involving and not involving historic resources. (e) Graphic and written design guidelines applicable to the district's preservation goals, historic character and features which shall include, but not be limited to: (i) Guidelines for projects involving historic resources, focused on preserving the district's character and significant archeological, architectural, and historic features; and (ii) Guidelines for projects within the district but not involving historically designated properties, focused on maintaining street character and compatibility with the district's historic character while not mimicking historic styles. 14.01.060 Post-Disaster Historic Preservation. 14.01.061 Purpose and goals. 14.01.062 Emergency Response Committee (ERC) established. 14.01.063 Provisions and fee waiver. 14.01.064 Stabilization of historic buildings. 14.01.065 Demolition of historic buildings. 14.01.066 City assistance. 14.01.061 Purpose and goals. Purpose: California is a seismically active area. State-wide experience shows that earthquakes can seriously damage or destroy important historic buildings. The 2003 San Simeon Earthquake and 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake demonstrated that historic buildings can be lost through actions taken by public agencies after an earthquake. These actions usually occur within ten days after a declared emergency. This would also apply to damage by fire, wind and flood. The purpose of these regulations is to facilitate recovery following a disaster in a way that balances the need to protect public health and safety, the economic interests of property owners and the need to preserve the community's most important historic buildings. These standards implement and are consistent with California Public Resources Code Section 5028 pertaining to natural disaster damage to historic properties. Goals: It is the goal of the City of San Luis Obispo to: (a) Continue to identify and designate archetypal or particularly significant historical structures within the City of San Luis Obispo. Such properties are identified by the Council as having the highest historical value by virtue of their unique architectural, historical or cultural significance, and are included in the Master List of Historic Resources. - Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 15 (b) Continue to preserve Master List resources and provide for their stabilization, restoration and/or reconstruction in the event of a disaster such as earthquake, fire, windstorm, or flooding. (c) Establish post-disaster historic preservation procedures that are consistent with state and local law, and specifically SLOMC Section 15.48; and (d) Establish an Emergency Response Committee that will develop, implement and monitor procedures for stabilization or demolition of Master List buildings which are damaged by an earthquake or other disaster. (e) Integrate post-disaster historic preservation with the City's disaster planning and emergency response protocols. 14.01.062 Emergency Response Committee (ERC) established. (a) The Council hereby establishes an "Emergency Response Committee" (ERC). The ERC's membership shall consist of. i) Community Development Director("Director") ii) City Engineer iii) Chief Building Official iv) Fire Marshall v) Cultural Heritage Committee member vi) Citizen Architect or Engineer (b) The Council, upon the recommendation of the Committee shall appoint members under subsection (a)(v) and (a)(vi), and shall appoint alternates for both positions. Committee members shall serve on a volunteer basis for 2-4 year terms. (c) City officials on the Committee may be represented by their designees. The ERC shall meet as needed, and shall be convened by the Director. All decisions shall require a majority vote of the quorum of ERC members. A quorum shall consist of four Committee members. (d) The citizen architect or engineer should be knowledgeable in historic building construction and preservation methods, to assist the City and owners of historically-listed buildings.. (e) The citizen architect or engineer should be registered as a Disaster Service Worker with the Office of Emergency Services. 14.01.063 Provisions and fee waiver. ws -a3� Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 16 If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster, the following provisions shall guide actions of the City and owners of Master List properties. City development review and permit fees for restoration or reconstruction of Master List properties may be reduced or waived by the City Council to facilitate preservation of significant historic resources and to expedite recovery from the disaster. 14.01.064 Stabilization of historic buildings. Within the first 90 days of a disaster, the City shall work with the property owners and all agencies concerned for the shoring and stabilization of Master List buildings that the ERC or Chief Building Official determines to be hazardous buildings. The following provisions shall apply unless waived by the Council: (a) As per SLOMC 15.48, placards shall be used to identify buildings the Chief Building Officer determines to be restricted or unsafe to occupy. In addition, buildings on the Master List of Historic Resources that are determined to be restricted or unsafe to occupy shall be clearly labeled by the City with the words "Master List Historic Building- This Placard is not a Demolition Order." (b) Members of the ERC shall be "on-call" as stated in Section 14.01.062(e), and should be able to assist disaster personnel and advise owners on emergency stabilization measures for Master List resources, consistent with City authority granted by law under emergency conditions. (c) City shall maintain a list of qualified architects and engineers, and make the list available to owners of Master List resources, to assist in preparing shoring and stabilization programs. (d) Owners of Master List resources shall submit a written report prepared by a qualified architect or engineer, outlining shoring and stabilization measures to be taken to the ERC for review and recommendation to the Chief Building Official for approval. (e) Members of the ERC, owners of Master List buildings, and owners' representatives shall have physical access to hazardous Master List buildings, at the Community Development Director's discretion, to recommend appropriate shoring and stabilization measures to be undertaken to the Chief Building Official. (f) Stabilization actions should occur within the time period specified by the ERC. A construction permit shall be obtained for stabilization actions, unless the requirement is waived by the City or is exempt from permit requirements. 14.01.065 Demolition of historic buildings. If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster, demolition of the structure may be authorized Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 17 under the provisions of the California Building Code (CBC) and under following provisions: The issuance of a demolition permit is governed by the provisions of this ordinance, which shall serve as local amendments to the procedures contained in the CBC. Removal or destruction of any character-defining feature of a Master List building, as determined by the Director or Chief Building Official, constitutes a demolition. Recommendations regarding stabilization methods and emergency demolition shall be made by the ERC. (a) Within 90 days of the initial date of the disaster, demolition permits shall not be issued unless the Director or Chief Building Official, upon the recommendation of the ERC, determines that earlier demolition is necessary to: i) eliminate an imminent, demonstrable threat to human life and/or undamaged property on adjacent streets or sites; or ii) provide access for emergency vehicles and personnel where no alternative route or service strategy is available. (b) After 90 calendar days following the initial date of the disaster, the issuance of demolition permit for a Master List building is subject to the normal permit processing procedures for demolition or relocation of historic buildings. The CHC shall make a recommendation to the Architectural Review Commission regarding demolition of Master List buildings. To recommend approval of a demolition permit application, the CHC must determine that: i) The historic resource is a hazard to public health or safety, and repairs, stabilization, preservation or rehabilitation is not structurally feasible. Deterioration resulting from the neglect or failure of the owner to maintain the property need not be considered in making this finding. The applicant shall provide one or more structural reports to document that repairs or stabilization are not feasible. ii) Denial of the application will deprive the property owner of the economically viable use of the property, after application of financial, land use and other incentives available to the property. ii) The proposed demolition is consistent with the General Plan and the California Environmental Quality Act. (c) To assist in the determination required by subsection (b), property owners shall submit a written report prepared by a licensed architect or engineer, knowledgeable in historic building construction, assessing the condition of the damaged building and evaluating strategies and costs for its restoration or reconstruction. Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 18 i) As a condition of any permit to demolish a Master List building or portion thereof that remains after a disaster, the owner shall provide photo-documentation to the Director showing building setbacks from property line, floor area, height, exterior architectural details, building form and materials, in a form acceptable to the CHC. ii) The ERC or CHC shall use photo-documentation to determine if any architectural features should be saved for reuse on the reconstructed building. If the property owner is unwilling or unable to save the identified architectural features, the City may, at its option, store the features for later use, consistent with Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, with the agreement of the property owner. Cost of City storage of the features if any will be borne by the property owner. iii) The ERC reserves the right to consider third-party assessments of the structural condition of the Master List building prepared by qualified professionals. 14.01.066 City assistance. To assist owners of buildings on the Master List of Historic Resources with stabilization, restoration and reconstruction work, the City shall: (a) Maintain photographic records of the exteriors of Master List buildings. (b) Give priority to the processing of applications and the issuance of building permits for restoration and reconstruction work. (c) Provide and distribute information brochures to local disaster personnel and Master List building owners with information describing funding sources, policies, and laws applicable to historical buildings, seismic hazard mitigation and response strategies, and historic preservation measures following a disaster. (d) Make available any of the applicable benefits listed in Chapter 4 of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 14.01.070 Non-Compliance With Provisions 14.01.071 Severability 14.01.072 Legal authority and enforcement 14.01.073 Enforcement 14.01.074 Historic Property Protection Standards 14.01.075 Economic Hardship 14.01.076 Historic and cultural resources trust fund P ti.) �� Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 19 14.01.071 Severability. Should any section or other portion of this ordinance be determined unlawful or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining section(s) and portion(s) of this ordinance shall be considered severable and shall remain in full force and effect. 14.01.072 Legal authority and enforcement. A. Authority. The Director, Chief Building Official, City Attorney, Cultural Heritage Committee, Council and their designees are hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. B. Fees. Council shall, by resolution, establish the fee(s) for applications and submissions made pursuant to this ordinance, fines, and fees for non-conformance with this ordinance and adopted Historic Preservation Program guidelines.. C. Time to correct. Director shall provide written notice of non-compliance to property owners. Notice shall be by certified mail or other method approved by the City attorney. Following receipt of notice, property owner shall have 30 days to correct the violation. Additional time to correct the violation may be allowed by the Chief Building Official where appropriate. Failure to demonstrate timely response to correct the violation may result in enforcement penalties. 14.01.073 Enforcement. A. Violations. Violating the provisions of this ordinance or of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, failure to obey an order issued by those authorized to enforce it, or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any discretionary City approval, certificate or permit issued under this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. B. Failure to protect property. No property owner or other responsible party shall cause or permit, by action or inaction, alteration of, damage to, deterioration, or demolition of in whole or part, of any significant features or characteristics of listed historic property or resource without first having obtained proper city authorization. C. Work stoppage. In addition to any other fines, penalties or enforcement provisions set forth in this ordinance, failure to comply in any respect with an approved application shall constitute grounds for immediate stoppage of the work involved in the noncompliance until the matter is resolved. D. Penalties. The City shall use procedures described in Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code and Administrative Citation Guidelines if any fines are imposed in conjunction with enforcement Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 20 of these regulations. Following notice and public hearing, the Council, may enforce the following penalties for violations of this ordinance: (a) Fine. The owner of the listed historic property may be assessed a one time fine of up to $10,000 per violation, as established by Council. In addition, the City may assess a fine ranging from $100 to $5,000 per day, up to a maximum of 30 days, for continuing violations. (b) Building permit restriction. City may prohibit the owner(s), successors, or assigns from obtaining a building permit for the subject property for a period of up to five (5) years from the date of violation, unless such permit(s) is for the purpose of correcting a building or zoning code violation or for complying with provisions of this ordinance. City shall initiate proceedings to place a deed restriction on the property to ensure enforcement of this restriction. The property owner shall be required to maintain the property during that period in conformance with standards set forth in this ordinance. (c) Loss of preservation benefits. Any historic preservation benefits previously granted to the property may be subject to revocation. (d) Restoration required. Any responsible party who demolishes or alters a property or structure in violation of this ordinance may be required to restore the property or structure to its appearance prior to the violation to the satisfaction of the Director. This shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any criminal prosecution and penalty, and applicable fines. (e) Other remedies. In addition to any other penalty authorized by law, failure to protect a historic resource may constitute a public nuisance resulting in the issuance of an order that the owner perform the maintenance necessary to comply with this section. Any failure to comply with suchan order shall entitle the City to cause the maintenance to be performed at the owner's expense and in addition to the penalties provided by this code for violation thereof, such cost may be recovered of such owner or occupant by civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. In addition, any such costs shall become a lien against the property. The fines and penalties contained herein are non-exclusive and are in addition to any other remedies the City may have. 14.01.074 Historic Property Protection Standards A. Preservation of listed historic resources. To prevent their deliberate or inadvertent neglect and potential loss, the property owner shall maintain listed historic resources in good repair, preseryed against vandalism, unauthorized entry, decay and deterioration, and free from structural defects and safety hazards, consistent with the Property Maintenance Standards (SLOMC Ch. 17.17), Community Design Guidelines, and standards as specified herein. P� -a� 7 � 1 Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 21 B. Property and building defects. The property owner of a listed historic property shall promptly repair the property if it is found to have any of the following defects which could result in loss of historic integrity of the resource: (1) Building elements in a condition that they may fall or otherwise damage property or injure members of the public. (2) Deteriorated, defective or inadequate foundation, flooring or floor supports causing exterior signs of structural failure, such as those listed in 3, 4, and 5 below. (3) Members of walls, partitions or other vertical supports that split, lean, list or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (4) Members of ceilings or roofs, ceiling or roof supports or other horizontal members which sag, split, or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (5) Fireplaces or chimneys which list, bulge, or settle due to defective materials or deterioration. (6) Deteriorated, crumbling or loose exterior plaster. (7) Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, including broken windows or doors. (8) Defective or insufficient weather protection for exterior wall covering, including lack of paint or other protective covering. (9) Any fault, defect or deterioration in the building which renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight. (10) Unsecured windows, doors or other openings that allow unauthorized entrance or use of . building or site. (11) Excessive trash, debris, un-maintained landscaping or other conditions that in the opinion of the Director or Chief Building Official may pose a public nuisance or hazard, or adversely affect the safety and condition of the property or adjacent properties. C. Imminent threat. If the Community Development Director or the Chief Building Official determines there is an imminent threat to a listed historic or cultural resource, the property owner shall be required to provide urgent measures for the protection of the resource within 72 hours of notification, including, but not limited to the securing of building openings, roof or wall repairs, Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 22 fencing, site lighting, site clean up, private security services, or other measures deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the resource and public health and safety. D. Demolition by neglect. If the Director, Chief Building Official, or the CHC determines a listed historic or cultural resource is being adversely affected due to neglect, the property owner or other person having legal custody and control of the resource shall be directed to take actions necessary to repair damage, protect and stabilize the property, and prevent further damage or deterioration. If, in the determination of the Director; Chief Building Official or the CHC, insufficient effort is made to correct the problem within 30 days of written notice to the property owner, the Director or the Chief Building Official shall initiate enforcement action. 14.01.075 Economic Hardship. If the applicant presents evidence clearly demonstrating to the satisfaction of the CHC or the City Council that the CHC's action will cause an extreme hardship because of conditions peculiar to the particular structure or other feature involved, the CHC may recommend approval, and the Council may approve or conditionally approve a demolition or other application to modify a listed historic resource even though it does not meet one or more standards set forth herein. The applicant shall bear the burden of proving the extreme hardship and shall provide substantiation of the claim to the CHC, which shall then make a recommendation to the Council on the hardship request. The CHC is authorized to request that the applicant furnish additional information, documentation and expert testimony, the cost of which shall be paid by the applicant, to be considered by the Committee in its related findings. All additional required information shall be provided by a qualified individual or firm selected by the City. In determining whether extreme hardship exists, the Committee and Council shall consider evidence that demonstrates: (a)Denial of the application will diminish the value of the subject property so as to leave substantially no value; or (b)Sale or rental of the property is impractical, when compared to the cost of holding such property for uses permitted in the zoning district; or (c)Utilization of the property for lawful purposes is prohibited or impractical; or (d)Rental at a reasonable rate of return is not feasible. 14.01.080 Historic and cultural resource preservation fund established. The Historic and Cultural Resource Preservation Fund ("Fund") is hereby established to provide for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic and cultural resources in the City of San Luis Obispo. The Council shall provide the policy direction for expenditures from the Fund. P ks'-a3 1 Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 23 A. Program Administration. The Director shall administer the Fund, following specific procedures and funding priorities adopted by the Council. B. Purpose. The purpose of the Fund is to provide funds for historic preservation projects within the City. All funds deposited in the Fund shall be used for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic or cultural resources, as provided in this section and as directed by the Council I. Financial Administration. Financial administration of the Fund shall be by the City Finance Director or his designee, in accordance with State and local law. Any interest earned on the fund shall accrue to the funds, unless Council specifically designates such funds for another purpose. 2. Grants, Gifts and Donations. The Finance Director shall deposit into the fund any grants, gifts, donations, rents, royalties, or other financial support earmarked by Council for historic or cultural resource preservation. C. Cultural Heritage Committee Role. The Committee shall advise the Council on the Fund regarding: 1. Criteria for use and award of funds; 2. Entering into any contract, lease, agreement, etc. for use of funds; 3. Any other action or activity necessary or appropriate to achieve the Fund purposes and the intent of this ordinance. D. Uses of Fund. The Fund may be used for: 1) the identification and protection of cultural resources, including preparation of historic surveys and design guidelines, 2) for the repair, restoration, rehabilitation, preservation and maintenance of historical buildings, features, or archaeological sites, 3) for public education on cultural resources, 4) for real property acquisition, including lease, purchase, sale, exchange or other forms of real property transfer or acquisition to protect significant historic resources, or 5) any other purpose approved by the Council provided that Council determines such actions are necessary to preserve the resource and in the best interests of the City. Council decisions on the use of funds are final. E. Loans and Grants. The Fund may be used, upon Council approval and recommendation by the Committee, for loans and grants to public agencies, nonprofit organizations and private entities to carry out the purposes of this ordinance. F. Preservation Agreements. Loans, grants or other financial assistance shall require execution of an agreement between the City and the recipient to ensure that such s - Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 24 award or assistance carries out the purposes of this ordinance and is consistent with applicable State and local standards. G. Funding Eligibility: The Fund shall be used to benefit properties on the Master or Contributing Properties List, or for other properties or uses deemed eligible by the Council upon recommendation by the Committee. 14.01.090 Appeals Decisions of the Director or Committee are appealable to the Council and shall be filed with the City Clerk. Action on appeals shall be considered at a public hearing, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1.20 of the Municipal Code. Where applicable, claims of economic hardship shall include sufficient evidence documenting that ordinance enforcement would cause serious economic deprivation to the property owner(s). 14.01.100 Definitions. For the purposes of this ordinance, certain terms, words and their derivatives shall be defined as specified herein; 1. Accessory Structure: a structure which is subordinate or incidental and directly related to a permitted use or structure on the same parcel. "Accessory structures" that include habitable space, as defined by the California Building Code,,shall be no larger than 450 square feet. (Ord. 941-1(part), 1982: prior code — 9204.11 (part)) `-`Accessory structures" are located on the same parcel and are related to the primary structure but are subordinate or incidental, but may include structures that have achieved historic significance in their own right, as determined by the Director, Committee or Council. (see"primary structure') 2. Adjacent: located on property which abuts the subject property on at least one point of the property line, on the same property, or located on property directly across right-of-way from subject property and able to viewed concurrently. 3. Adverse Effects: effects, impacts.or actions that are detrimental or potentially detrimental to a historic resource's condition, architectural or historical integrity. 4 Alteration: any change, repair, replacement, modification, or new construction to: (1) the exterior of an historic resource or adjacent building, (2) the exterior and interior structural elements which support the exterior walls, roof, or exterior elements of the historic resource or adjacent building, (3) other construction on a lot, or(4) Character Defining Features of the interior of a historic resource, unless the interior is exempt from historic review by the Cultural Heritage Committee. `'Alteration' does not include ordinary landscape maintenance unless the landscaping is identified as significant at the time a property is listed, receives historic "H"zoning, or is identified in an adopted historic preservation.report. J Attachment a Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 25 5. Archaeological Site: those areas where archaeological resources are present and may be larger or smaller than the project site. An archaeological site may include prehistoric Native American archaeological site, Historic archaeological sites; sites or natural landscapes associated with important human events; and Native American Sacred Places and Cultural landscapes. 6. ARC: the Architectural Review Commission as appointed by the City Council. 7. California Register: California Register of Historical Resources defined in California PRC 5024.1 and in CCR Title 14 Chap 11.5, Sec 4850 et seq. as it may be amended. 8. CHC: the Cultural Heritage Committee as appointed by the City Council, 9. Character Defining Features: as outlined in the U.S. Department of the Interior's National Register Bulletin 15 and Preservation Brief 17: "How to Identify Character Defining Features", the architectural character and general composition of a resource, including, but not limited to, type and texture of building material; type, design, and character of all windows, doors, stairs, porches, railings, molding and other appurtenant elements; and fenestration, ornamental detailing, elements of craftsmanship, finishes, etc. 10. City: the City of San Luis Obispo.. 11. Community Design Guidelines: the most recent version of the City's Community Design Guidelines asadopted and amended from time to time. 12. Contributing Resource: Buildings or other resources at least 50 years old that maintain their original or attained historic and architectural character, and contribute either by themselves or in conjunction with other structures to the unique or historic character of a neighborhood, district, or to the City as a whole.. They need not be located in a historic district, but should be visible to the public. In some cases, buildings or other resources that are less than 50 years old, but are nonetheless significant based on architecture, craftsmanship or other criteria as described herein may be designated as a Contributing resource. 13. Council: the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo. 14. Cultural Resource: any prehistoric or historic district, site, landscape, building, structure, or object included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation, including artifacts, records, and material remains related to such a property or resource. 15. Demolition: for the purpose of this ordinance, "demolition" refers to any act or failure to act that destroys, removes, or relocates, in whole or part a historical resource such that its historic or architectural character and significance are materially altered. Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 26 16. Deterioration: the significant worsening of a structure's condition, architectural or historic integrity, due to lack of maintenance, organisms, neglect, weathering and other natural forces. 17. Director: the Director of the Community Development Department, or another person authorized by the Director to act on his or her behalf. 18. Disaster: "Disaster" shall include fire, flood, earthquake, landslide, subsidence, tsunami, acts of war or civil unrest, or other catastrophic event as declared by the Council, the Governor of the State of California or the President of the United States. 19. Feasible: capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account cultural, economic, environmental, historic, legal, social and technological factors. 20. Historic Building Code: the most recent version of the California Historical Building Code, Title 25, Part, 8, as defined in Sections 18950 to 18961 of Division 12, Part 2.7 of Health and Safety Code (H&SC), a part of California State law. Its purpose is to provide regulations and standards for the rehabilitation, preservation, restoration (including related reconstruction) or relocation as applicable to all historical buildings, structures and properties deemed of importance to the history, architecture, or culture of an area by an appropriate local or state governmental jurisdiction. 21. Historic Context: Historic context are those patterns, themes or trends in history by which a specific occurrence, property, or site is understood and its meaning and significance is made clear. 22. Historic District/Historical Preservation District: areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed or potentially contributing historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, where historic properties help define the area or neighborhood's unique architectural, cultural, and historic character or sense of place. Historic districts may be, delineated on the official zoning map as Historic (H) overlay zone under San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Chapter 17.54. 23. Historic Preservation Program Guidelines: the most recent version of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines, as adopted from time to time. 24. Historic Preservation Report. a document which describes preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction measures for a historic resource, based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties, and which includes standards and ��3 Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 27 guidelines for recommended treatments for preserving the resource. A historic preservation report shall require approval by the CHC and the approval shall remain in effect for a period of at least three years from the approval date. The Director or on referral from the Director, the CHC may extend or re-adopt an approved program for a period of up to ten years. 25. Historic Property: a property, including land and buildings, which possesses aesthetic, architectural, cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation. 26. Historic Resource: any building, site, improvement, area or object of aesthetic, architectural, cultural, historic or scientific significance, and which is included in, or potentially eligible for local, State or National historic designation. 27. Historic Status: historic designation of a listed resource or property as approved by Council. 28. Improvement: any building, structure, fence, gate, landscaping, hardscaping, wall, work of art, or other object constituting a physical feature of real property or any part of such feature. 29. Inappropriate Alteration: alterations to historic resources which violate these provisions and/or the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 30. Integrity, Architectural or Historical: the ability of a property, structure; site, building, improvement or natural feature to convey its identity and authenticity, including but not limited to its original location, period(s) of construction, setting, scale, design, materials, detailing, workmanship, human values, uses and association. 31. Inventory of Historic Resources: the list of historically designated resources and properties consisting of Master List and Contributing Properties List Historic Resources, and any properties, objects, sites, gardens, sacred places and resources subsequently added to the inventory as determined to meet criteria outlined herein and approved by the City Council. 32. Listed Resource: properties and resources included in the Inventory of Historic Resources. 33. Massing: the spatial relationships, arrangement and organization of a building's physical bulk or volume. 34. Master List Resource: designation which may be applied to the most unique and important historic properties and resources meeting criteria outlined herein. 35. Minor Alteration. Any structural or exterior change to a historic resource which the Director determines to be consistent with the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and other applicable standards. �p - a � Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 28 36. Modern Contributing Resources: designation which may be applied to properties and resources which are less than 50 years old, but which exemplify or include significant works of architecture or craftsmanship. 37. National Register of Historic Places: the official inventory of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in American history, architecture, engineering, archaeology and culture which is maintained by the Secretary of the Interior under the authority of the Historic Sites Act of 1935 and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. 38. Neglect: the lack of maintenance, repair or protection from natural elements or vandalism of a listed property, resource, site or structure, whether intentional or not, which results in significant deterioration, as determined by the Director, CHC or City Council based on visual and physical evidence. 39. Non-Contributing Resource: designation which may be applied to properties and resources in historic districts which are typically less than 50 years old and do not support the prevailing historic character of the district or other listing criteria.as outlined herein. 40. Preservation: the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain a historic site, building or other structure's historically significant existing form, integrity, and materials through stabilization, repair and maintenance. 41. Property Owner: the person or entity holding fee title interest or legal custody and control of a property. 42. Primary Structure: the most important building or other structural feature on a parcel in terms of size, scale, architectural or historical significance, as determined by the Committee. 43. Qualified Professional. an individual meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61 Appendix A) in history, architectural history, historic architecture and other designated categories, or an individual determined by the CHC to have the qualifications generally equivalent to the above standards based on demonstrated experience. 44. Reconstruction: the act or process of recreating the features, form and detailing of a non- surviving building or portion of building, structure, object, landscape, or site for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. 45. Rehabilitation: the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its architectural, cultural, or historic values. PSS _ ads Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 29 46. Relocation: removal of a resource from its original site and its re-establishment at another location in essentially the same form, appearance and architectural detailing. 47. Remodel: Alteration of a structure which retains at least 75 percent of the original building framework, roof and exterior bearing walls and cladding, in total, and which reuses the original building materials to the maximum extent possible. 48. Responsible party: any person,business, company or entity, and the parent or legal guardian of any person under the age of eighteen (18) years, who has done any act for which an administrative penalty may be imposed. 49. Restoration the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. 50. Scale: the proportions of architectural design that relate to human size or other relative size measure. 51. Secretary of the Interior's Standards: the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as published by the U.S. Department of the Interior and as amended from time to time. 52. Setting: the physical area, environment or neighborhood in which a resource is located. 53. Sensitive Site: a site determined by the Community Development Director, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Commission or Council, upon recommendation of the Cultural Heritage Committee, to have special characteristics, constraints or community value such as: historic significance, historic context, creek side location or visual prominence, requiring more detailed development review than would otherwise be required.for other similarly zoned lots. 54. Site: as used in this ordinance, the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure; whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. In general terms, site also includes the landscape surrounding a building or other structure and contained within an individual parcel or contiguous parcels of land. 55. Siting: the placement of structures and improvements on a property or site. 56. Stabilization: the act or process of applying measures designed to reestablish a weather resistant enclosure and the structural stability of an unsafe or deteriorated property while maintaining the essential form as it exists at present. Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 30 57. Statement of Historic Significance: A statement of significance is an analysis-based argument or explanation of why a resource is important within its historic context. It explains how the resource meets the eligibility criteria and integrity thresholds as established by local, state or federal government. . 58. Structure: as used here, "structure" includes anything assembled or constructed on the ground, or attached to anything with a foundation on the ground, including walls, fences, buildings; signs, bridges, monuments, and similar features. 59. Survey: a systematic process for identifying and evaluating a community's resources using established criteria. "Survey' may also refer to the documentation resulting from a survey proj ect. 60. Threatened Resource: properties or resources at risk of loss of architectural, cultural or historic value due to physical alteration, relocation or demolition. 61. Zoning Code: Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. SECTION 4. A summary of this ordinance, together with the names of Council members voting for and against, shall be published at least five (5) days prior to its final passage, in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper published and circulated in this City. This ordinance shall go into effect at the expiration of thirty(30) days after its final passage. INTRODUCED on the 21"day of September, 2010 AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the_ day of 2010, on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor David F. Romero Attachment 8 Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 31 ATTEST: City Clerk Elaina Cano APPROVED AS TO ORM: r� C' Attorney J. Christine Dietrick T:\Council Agenda Reports\Community Development CAR\2010\Historic Preservation\Draft Ordinance Resolution.DOC IL HLUEWFU AL SEP 16 2010 _ RED FILE r CDDJR MEETING AGENDAFINFIN SLO CITY CLERK DATE ITEM # PHS FIREPW 16 September 2010 m POL D ,,IT HEADS jZI REC DIR PrUTIL DIR To: Mayor Dave Romero and City Council members -�Ll f�(HR DIR I �f n1EhlTiMES fil cbVta"" From: Deborah Cash, Executive Director ¢SLO CATV%j6J1CM C.t rre1L Re: Historic Preservation Ordinance The Board of Directors of the San Luis Obispo Downtown Association has reviewed and discussed the most recent draft of the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and based on reasons outlined below believes adoption of the ordinance by the City Council will be beneficial for the community. The Board, at its September 14 meeting, declared unanimous support for the ordinance however voiced the following concerns: 1. The Board would like to see further development of provisions for financial assistance to current owners of historic properties (or those who inherit historic properties)who may be financially unable to comply with the ordinance. As much consideration as possible should be given to those owners who are on fixed incomes or are `at risk' of falling into noncompliance due to financial circumstances in the areas of grants, matching funds, loans and subsidies once the necessary steps are taken to qualify the recipient for such assistance. While the goal of the ordinance is preservation of historic properties and thus preservation of a community's heritage, the properties ultimately belong to the property owner and no ordinance should be overly onerous for property owners to the community's benefit. 2. The Board feels the fines for noncompliance"up to$5,000"per day seem overly punitive. Perhaps the amount and/or wording could be refined to reduce the negative response that that amount seems to generate. Background and history for this recommendation A subcommittee of the Board was formed in early summer to research the draft ordinance in detail and make a report and recommendation to the Board. Subcommittee members: ■ Pierre Rademaker, Downtown Association Board member and former president, member Economic Activities Committee, Downtown business owner, graphic designer, Chair of Downtown Design Concept team and historic property owner ■ Alex Gough, Downtown historic property and business owner, member of historic inventory and guidelines team (1980s), former board member, realtor, member Economic Activities Committee ■ George Garcia, architect, member Economic Activities committee, developer and owner of historic property ■ Deborah Cash, Executive Director, Certified Main Street Manager The Downtown Association, a Main Street®organization and recipient of the 1999 Great American Main Street Award from the National Trust for Historic Preservation's Main Street Program®, is committed to the concept and ideals of historic preservation through its participation in the National Trust's Four Point Program of Downtown revitalization. I Certainly the Downtown Association has much at stake in wanting to preserve the historic aspects of the Downtown, develop a sense of place and work with the City to achieve high standards of preservation. In fact, the basis of the Downtown Association's work plan programs is the Four Point Program of Organization, Economic Revitalization, Promotions and Design. The program was developed with the knowledge that downtowns—and the historic properties within them—are worth saving and are vital to the nation's economy and history; the four points are the guidelines for the activities a Main Street®organization should follow to restore, rehabilitate and operate historic downtown areas. In reviewing the draft ordinance, the subcommittee found opportunities to support the draft recommendations based on the ordinance's compatibility with the Downtown Association's Strategic Plan as shown: Strategic Goals 2.4 Encourage additional development and commercial opportunities The Association will continue to support infill development that contributes to a dense, cohesive Downtown area. While this particular statement is described in the Plan in terms of mostly new or re-use development,over the past several years, this has come to include retrofitted properties that are maintaining historic elements while going on to satisfy the intent of the statement. Some examples would be the Warden Building, the proposed Garden Street Terraces and Chinatown projects, the Stream Building, the Wineman Hotel. Preserving the key historic features and turning commercial properties into residences, offices, shops and restaurants blends historic preservation and economic development principles perfectly. 3.4 Strengthen tourism attraction As a result of declines in tourism in the early 2000's, the City developed the Tourism Marketing Plan 2003 to increase TOT revenues by improving the City's brand image, encouraging longer stays and developing strategic alliances with destination organizations like the Downtown Association. One of the recommendations of this goal is to Promote Heritage Tourism: The popularity of Downtown as a tourist destination is due, in part, to its historic character. Historic architecture, the Mission, the Chinatown Historic District and the Downtown's designation as a recipient of the National Trust for Historic Preservation's Distinctive Destinations in America should be prominently featured in all promotional materials. It's not surprising that people visiting Downtown SLO from out of the area are drawn to view and photograph the historic structures like the Sinsheimer Building, JP Andrews Building, Sauer Adams Adobe, Carnegie Library,The Creamery and many others. 4.1 Support higher density projects as appropriate The Downtown Association will monitor and support General Plan policies and proposed zoning changes to increase allowable height and intensity limits to encourage residential and hotel construction. r I Again, given that some of Downtown's historic buildings are in the process of being retrofitted, it makes sense to allow increased density that will provide for the return on the investment of saving an historic building for adaptive reuse as opposed to demolishing the building. Historic preservation guidelines that allow for this flexibility in order to preserve, rather than lose, the structure are encouraged. 5.1 Maintain high level of cleanliness and maintenance A key feature typically linked to restored and preserved structures is their owners and managers tend to provide a high level of care and maintenance, showing their pride in their properties and protecting their investments. While the City provides services to the public areas,business and property owners are encouraged to augment this service with ongoing building maintenance; guidelines for historic preservations enhance the encouragement for property owners to comply. Further, the City's standards for Mission Style sidewalks, as suggested in the Measure Y initiative,provide an attractive complement to historic properties and should be encouraged in these developments. 5.5 Protect Downtown's historic resources San Luis Obispo has a rich cultural heritage and an informal citizenry who value and protect that heritage. Special interest is focused on the Downtown area. The Downtown Association recognizes that historic resources ad to the special character that makes Downtown so attractive to shoppers, visitors and investors and will work to protect historic character. ■ Support the Cultural Heritage Commission's (CHC)efforts to update City preservation codes and processes. The Association will provide input as appropriate. ■ Support CRC's efforts to update historic inventories. Most of the City's inventories of historic structures was done in the 1980s. Encourage the City, as appropriate, to update inventories of Downtown properties. ■ The Association will support General Plan policies that protect, incorporate or mitigate the impact of new development on historic resources. ■ Promote seismic retrofitting. Eighty-four un reinforced masonry buildings in Downtown were subject to the City's seismic safety mitigation plan. Thirtyfive of these buildings are on the Master List of Historic Resources. ■ Promote compliance with the Hazard Mitigation Plan in a positive manner to owners and tenants. 7.2 Encourage use of City policies that will facilitate post-disaster rebuilding ■ Work with the City to ensure that damage assessment procedures and forms make it easy to clearly document damage to the architectural features of Downtown's historic buildings and that appropriate personnel are trained in their use. Review California Preservations Foundation's model documents. ° Work with the City to ensure that any special post-disaster building repair ordinances include repair standards and design guidelines and a streamlined process for reviewing and approving the increased number of building permits that could result from a disaster. These standards could also streamline the rebuilding of historic buildings in-kind. 7.4 Include DT business recovery issues in citywide disaster planning activities The Downtown Association should have a representative at the City's Emergency Operations Center during drills and actual disasters to provide the information contained in the Association's Disaster Plan. Outside of the these compatible objectives, the Downtown Association, as a Certified National Trust Main Street program, also believes that precepts in the Main Street guideline provide further areas for support: Rehabilitation Tax Credits A tax credit is a dollar for dollar offset against taxes payable. The rehabilitation tax credits are available in two levels. The historic property tax credit represented 20 percent of the qualified rehabilitation expenditure if the following tests are met: the property is an individually listed building in the national Register of Historic Places, or is a contributing building in a National Register Historic District or is a qualifying local historic district. The total expenditure is the greater of$5,000 or the basis in the building, called the substantial rehabilitation test, and the work is done in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Depreciable properties held for use in trade or business or as an investment property are eligible. The non historic credit is available for buildings that were constructed before 1937 but are not historic properties; there are no rehabilitation standards and the credit is only available for commercial properties. (From National Main Street Center, Certification Institute in Professional Downtown Management) Further, the government's Historic Preservation Services Tax Incentive manual states, "Historic buildings are tangible links with the past. They help give a community a sense of identity, stability and orientation. The government encourages the preservation of historic buildings through various means.. One of these is the program of Federal tax incentives to support the rehabilitation of historic and older buildings. The Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program is one of the Federal government's most successful and cost-effective community revitalization programs...rewarding private investment in rehabilitating historic properties such as offices, rental housing and retail stores." Therefore, City-established guidelines and ordinances that promote eligibility in these programs are supported by the Board. The Board applauds the Council's and city staff s dedication to the preservation of historic properties and is hopeful that a final document will rely heavily on incentives and positive motivation in ensuring compliance. Page 1 of 1 J Q The sender of this message has requested a read receipt. Click here to send a receipt, Coundl, SloClty From: Phil Gray[pgray@Midstate-cal.com] Sent: Mon 9/13/2010 12:19 PM To: Council,SloCity Cc: David Gray;Jim Smith; Phil Gray; onebluejeanne@gmail.com; ]ohn.Evans@CannonAssoc.Com Subject: FW: Orcutt Area Annexation ER 81-10 R E C E I E D Attachments: SEP 16 20 0 Honorable Councilpersons: SLO CITY CLERK As owners of one of the parcels comprising the Orcutt Area,we want to encourage you to continue the approval process as it will be presented to you on Sept 21st. Much study and discussion has gone into all these Items,and we request that they be approved as shown in the Staff Report. Thank you for your consideration. RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DA 21 o ITEM # E Ll Phil Gray David Gray Jim Smith FDEPTAn-2 CDD DIR FIN DIR Mid State Properties, LLC FIRE CHIEF RWbIR 1320 Archer St. POLICE CHF REO Dip San Luis Obispo,CA 43401 i LITIL DIR JZ by PIR (805)543 1500; Fax 543-1590; Cell 4S9-9700 1 1 b.IT(4E R(�tt�UL SLO UT gjl5ws CLOP, . RECEIVED SEP 13 2010 SLO CITY CLERK https://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/FW:%200rcun%2OArea%2OAnnex... 9/13/2010 Richardson, April From: webserver@slocity.org s p IEC Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 201011:33 AM To: Richardson,April SEP 1,6129 Subject: Contact Us Form SLO CITY CLLR.,,;. Name: jay paul jackson Address: citizen of SLO City: san luis obispo State: ca zip: 93401 Phone: Fax: email from: jaxjaxon@hotmail .com Message: What are you doing with this Bill, Issue, referendum about fineing home owners in historic districts because you decide to make the rules as you go, $100 to $10, 000 fines for what are indiscretions in your view. that can change from property to property. look up the term fascism.To controal the populace by force through threats .Jay P Jackson RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DA 21 io ITEM #21J rDEPTHEAC)S CDD DIR FIN DIR � FIRE CHIEF PW DIR POLICE CHF REC DIR UTIL DIR l4 po O!R j3 rfE►.1TngE$ Co u—�sc..1L�. Page 1 of 1 Council,SloCity From: NCirone@aol.com [NCirone@aol.com] Sent: Wed 9/15/2010 6:30 PM To: Council,SloCity Cc: Subject: Historic Preservation Attachments: As an affected homeowner,[ strongly urge a no vote on this proprosal.This represents everything that is becoming bad about SLO.Over regulation at its finest.Mr Ashbaugh has already made up his mind(as he indicated on the radio).And will lose my vote because of it.lam a life long resident of SLO Nick Cirone RECEIVE® SEP 16 2010 SLO CITY CLERK RED FILE ME I ING AGENDA DATE-011D 120 ITEM # N S COUNCIL l21 CDD DIR E �sCM B FIN DIR WATT RNA I Z FIRE CHIEF CLERI(iCRlO 171 PIN DIR DEPT HEAD$ Z POLICE CHF Z paC DIA �E— ri HR IISUoDIR N�'^/T'�5 3 Cou zz J c,T7rgcws RCP1 https:Hmail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycounciL/Inbox/Historic%2OPreservation.EML?Cm... 9/16/201 0 RECEIVED E IMEETING AC 'DA SEP l b--Lola DATE 2► 10 ITEM # Plate SLO CITY C RK �. counc�` memoRanc>um ;city of an ltus_osispo, aammistuatlon.OsparztmEntfz0 Cop_ fal1AIL �Z COUNCIL Rf CDD DIR DATE: September 16, 2010 6AG. em je FIN DIR * A9_ACM V FIRE CHIEF TO: Ci Council pJ ATTORNEY APW DIR City JZ CLERK/ORIG pl POLICE CHF ❑ D�PeT HEADS X REC DIR FROM: Michael Codron, Acting Assistant City Managerte r , Z LIME DIR HR DIR VIA: John Mandeville, Community Development Director ;r Nei I04E5 ¢cDWX L. �(Sw C n&ILWS )9 CC"isIRIL By: Kim Murry, Deputy Community Development Director T' SUBJECT: Historical Preservation Ordinance Reference Documents(PHI) Council person Marx requested information related to several items. Staff is providing this information to all Council members in the event similar questions arise. Below, please find a link to the 2007 staff report to the Council that resulted in a General Plan amendment affecting Downtown Building Heights. http://www.slociiy.otWciiyclerk/agendas/2007/020607awVi)h I apamendbldgheight.pdf The CHC requested staff assessment of the City's eligibility to become a Certified Local Government on 8/27/07. The link to that staff report is provided below: http://www.slocity.orWcommunitydevelopment/cultiiralherit/staff%2Oreports/0827072.pdf The CHC Whitepaper is attached for Council review. Finally, Council person Marx requested clarification if TDCs are addressed as part of the proposed documents, Chapter 4 of the proposed Guidelines describes possible incentives and benefit programs for historic resources. One of the listed possibilities is the use of TDCs and is described under 4.1.7(copied below). For clarification,the CHC intended this option to be available City-wide subject to Council approval. 4.1.7 Transfer of development credit. For projects that preserve cultural or historic resources on site, the City may enter into an agreement to transfer development credit or density to another appropriate site proportional to the commercial floor area or number of dwellings possible to develop under current zoning if the resource were removed. GAStafflCodron\Council Memo Historic.dot RECEIVED SEP 17 2010 City of San Luis Obispo September 14,20 10 SLO CITY CLERK 990 Palm St. San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Subject: Public hearing Sept 21,2010 Historic Preservation Ordinance Atm: Kim Murry GPI-72-09 Dear Ms. Murry: My wife and I are the owners of residential property at 1265 Ella St.which is included as a "Contributory"property in the subject proposed Ordinance. 1 have just read"most"of the proposed Ordinance on-line and am deeply concerned about several components. We are out-of-town owners and cannot attend the hearing on 9/21. We wish to have our concerns expressed to the City Council prior to or at the hearing. It appears this Ordinance is much more draconian than I first believed two or so years ago when the subject first came to my attention. 1. I am deeply concerned about the over-reaching authority of the City to control the maintenance of our property, even so far as landscaping,painting,and other repairs or replacements..This property has been in my wife's family since her father built it in the early 1940's. We don't need the the City to now start telling us when and where something needs to be done. 2. The proposed fines and fees for non-compliance are outrageous. We are retired and on a fixed income,depending in part on the rental income from this property.The $10000 fine and up-to-$5000/day fees with liens are essentially a confiscation of property if the owner is unable to pay or correct the situation that"someone"in the City deems needed to be done. 3. We also question the inclusion of our property as a"Contributary"property except for the fact that it is over 50 years old. It does not have any unique architecture according to your guidelines,nor is it in one of your principal"H"zones. We would ask that our property be excluded from your list of properties. We strongly believe that further modifications[or exclusions]need to be made before this ordinance is adopted. Thank You //For Your Consideration, Wellman Branstrom 17012 Greentree Ln. Huntington Beach,CA 92649 RED FILE - MEETING AGENDA DA 21 IlD ITEM # P}15 ")L COUNCIL CDD DIR 846 CM FIN DIR -AGA8 " FIRE CHIEF ATTORNEY d PW DIR �IERK/ORIQ POLICE CHF P HEADS REC DIR UTILDR =R DIR z - ­= mma ►.1Er^1 TI r its N COUU I_ ALO U�klmF S 5 Sep 1710 08:15a Jan Howell Marx 805-5410441 L- COUNCIL wo CDD DIR Fk. JFILE ZeflaC-H ;a FIN DIR RECEIVED MEETING AGENDA ra ABAB AC-M FIRE CHIEF fd ATTORNEY PW DIR SEP 17 2010 DATE 2l ITEM #pNs O CLERK/ORIG POLICE CHF ❑ DEPT HEADS )z REG DIR SLID CITY CLERK MEMORANDUM `• /1 Pic E HR DIRR r, anl �HR DIR �J iJE�J Tr[ES � CoWJG1�- To: San Luis Obispo City Council mSw C-"ki" From: Jan Marx,City Council Member Re: September 21, 2010 item PH 5 (Historic Preservation Ordin e) Date: September 17,2010 As you know, I am a long time advocate of historical preservation. That said, I am deeply concerned about aspects of the proposed new ordinance and guidelines, especially its effect on owners who occupy a historic residence and especially in these economic times. Precinct walking in the Old Town area,I have met many residents who are owner- occupiers of old homes. Right now, they are frightened by the prospect of the city imposing huge fines, putting liens or deed restrictions on their homes,or forcing them to make renovations or repairs which they simply cannot afford. They are afraid the city might prosecute them criminally if they must defer maintenance for economic reasons. An example is a man in his eighties with limited means,who was born in the same house he Lives in today.He is afraid the city might put him in jail if he cannot afford to maintain his home the way the city wants. I am concerned that this ordinance might inadvertently create disincentives for owning/buying historic homes. It might make it harder to sell them due to the risk of unknown future financial liability. Also,if a developer could just buy transfer development credits, there might be an incentive to buy them and destroy historical buildings--which might cheaper than going through the more protective CEQA process. In my opinion,the formulation of any change in the status quo should have started with the people who actually live in and own these historic homes. Staff consulted with the Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Association, but did not reach out to residents of historic homes prior to writing the initial draft. When the city change ordinances, guidelines or the General Plan, our tradition is to start with the present language,and deliberate line by line to determine if anything needs to be changed, as was not done in this case. I have attached a number of pages from the ordinance with my notes and proposed changes which would alleviate some of my concerns and which I will discuss in greater detail at our meeting. Here are a selected few: 1. The fines are way too high, especially for an owner-occupier. If the historic resource produces business or rental income, and the property owner is willfully destroying a historical resource,then such a fine might be justified as a deterrent. (PH 5-237) Sep 17 10 08:15a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-2716 p.2 2. This ordinance would drastically and inappropriately change the role of the Cultural Heritage Commission("CHC"). Council appoints citizen volunteers to the.CHC to give ADVICE to Council,the Planning Commission and the ARC,not to become enforcers of the ordinance or impose penalties on their neighbors(PH 5-236 & 239). A CHC volunteer should not be part of the ERC and should not be "on call" during an emergency or have physical access to hazardous buildings(PH 5-232-233). ERC decisions should be presented to the whole CHC for deliberation. (PH 5-235) 3. The"Time to correct"provisions are harsher than the present provisions of Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal code. (PH 5-236) Economic feasibility should be taken into account(PH5-238) 4. Violation of the ordinance should not be subject to criminal sanctions. (PH 5- 236) Administrative citation is sufficient. 5. There must be a time limit by which the city must lift deed restrictions from people's homes after correction or compliance (PH 5-237) 6. Historical resources should not be permitted to be relocated, except as allowed under CEQA and the Secretary of the Interior's standards. (PHS-239) 7. The Historical Fund should not be used as a means for the city to acquire real property, especially under a scenario where first the city places a lien, then just acquires the property. (PHS-240)It should be used to assist home owners who cannot afford costly renovations or repairs. 8. The Director's decision regarding the need for CHC review cannot overrule that of the Council, Planning Commission or ARC (PH5-223) 9. The ordinance should apply to publically owned resources, such as adobes. Perhaps consideration of the incredible amount of General Fund money it would take to restore the adobes will give pause to over zealous prosecution under this ordinance. (PH 5-228) Sep 1710 08:15a Jan Howell Marc ___ 805-541-2716 p.3 Attachment 8 Ordiw=No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 5 review, and for guiding City and property owner decisions regarding cultural resources in San Luis Obispo. B. Identify and recommend to the Council those properties, areas, sites, buildings, structures or other features having significant historical, cultural, architectural, community, scientific or aesthetic value to the citizens of San Luis Obispo. C. Maintain and update the Master and Contributing Properties Lists of Historic Resources, and Historic Property and Archaeological Site Inventories. D. Review and make recommendations to decision makers on actions that may affect significant archaeological, cultural or historic resources. E. Advise and assist property owners, developers and staff in the application of architectural, historic and cultural preservation standards and guidelines to projects and approvals involving historic sites,districts and structures. F. Collect and consolidate information about cultural resources and promote, participate in, or sponsor educational and interpretive programs which foster public awareness and appreciation of cultural resources. G. Provide advice and guidance on the restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping and maintenance oflisted resources, and properties within historic preservation districts. H. Administer incentive programs approved by the Council that are directed at preserving and maintaining cultural resources. I. Assist property owners with the preparation of local, state and federal historic nominations to enable property owners to utilize preservation incentives, including the.NUs Act and federal tax incentives such as rehabilitation tax credits. J.Function within the guidelines and policies of the Advisory Body Handbook and perform other duties as assigned b C#L � y Council. /j` 14.01.040 Actions Subject to Cultural Heritage Committee Revie v. p4r 012- The 1ZThe Committee shall review and make recommendations on the following actions: A.Changes to the Inventory of Historic Resources. B. Changes to historic districts and applications to establish new historic districts. Sep 1710 08:16a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-2716 p.4 Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 6 C. Statements of historic significance and historic inventories for existing and proposed historic districts. D. New construction, additions or alterations located in or adjacent to historic districts, or at historically listed properties, or sensitive archaeological sites. �— L4��u4 E.Applications to demolish or relocate listed resources or structures. F Projects and actions referred to the Committee by the Community Development Directo("Director"),Architectural Review Commission Planning Commission, or Council. G. Actions of public agencies that may affect historic or cultural resources within the City. 14 01045 Community Development Director Role The CHC is assisted by staff of the Community Develop ent Department. The Community Development Director ("Director") is responsible for ' terpreting and implementing this ordinance and helping the CHC carry out its duties. Section 14.01.040 of this ordinance, the Director may determine that CHC review is not required for actions or projects that: 1) do not adversely affect historic resources,or 2) areconsistentwith this ordinance and the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and no public purpose would be served by requiring CHC review. 14,01.050 Cultural heritage Review Procedures. The Committee shall prepare and maintain Historic and Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines that implement this ordinance and set forth the guidelines for cultural heritage review. These documents shall require Council approval. A record copy of the guidelines shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in the Community Development Department. Copies shall be available on the City's website and printed versions will be available at cost. 14.01.051 Resource Designation The following classifications are used to designate historic resources and properties. The primary categories of historic significance are "Master List" and "Contributing"properties. The Master List includes the City's most important historic resources in terms of age, architectural or historical significance, rarity, or association with important persons or events in the City's past Contributing properties include those properties that by virtue of their age, design and appearance, contribute to and embody the historic character of the historic district or neighborhood in which they are located. Sep 1710 08:16a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-2716 p.5 AttachMeFlt 8 Ordinance No.(H 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page I! /a�k),e-fi B. Caltw A Resources on public property. Cultural and historic feshrres on public property, such as///Bishop's peak granite walls and curbing, sidewalk embossing, ornamental manhole covers and hitching posts, may be added to the Inventory of Historic Resources through CHC review as specified herein. 14.01.055 Historic District Designation,Purpose and Application A.Historic (H)District designation. All properties within historic districts shall be designated by an "H"zoning. Properties zoned"H"shall be subject to the provisions and standards as provided in Ordinance 17.54 of the Municipal Code- B. Purposes of Historic Districts.The purposes of historic districts and H zone designation are to: (a)Implement cultural resource preservation policies of the General Plan,the preservation provisions of adopted area plans, the Historic Preservation and Archaeological Resource Preservation Programs Guidelines, and (b)Identify and preserve definable, unified geographical entities that possess a significant concentration,linkage, or continuity of sites,buildings, structures,or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development; (c) Implement historic preservation provisions of adopted area and neighborhood improvement plans; (d) Enhance and preserve the setting of historic rzsourocs so that surrounding laud uses and structures do not detract from the historic or architectural integrity of designated historic resources and districts; and (e)Promote the public understanding and appreciation ofhistoric resources. C. Eligibility for incentives. Properties designated as Historic Preservation (H) shall be eligible for preservation incentive and benefit programs as established herein, in the Guidelines and other local, state and federal programs. D. Where applied. The (ED designation may be applied to areas or neighborhoods with a collection or concentration of listed historic properties or archaeologically significant sites, or where historic properties help define an area or neighborhood's unique architectural and historic character or sense of place. 1 ."W district combined. A Historic Preservation Overlay District (H) may be combined with any zoning district, and shall be shown by adding an"H" to the base zone designation. H district Sep 1710 08:17a Jan Howell Marx - 805-541-2716 p.6 Attachment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preswumtion Ordinance Page 15 (b) Continue to preserve Master List resources and provide for their stabilization, restoration and/or reconstruction in the event of a disaster such as earthquake, fire,windstorm, or flooding. (c) Establish post-disaster historic preservation procedures that are consistent with state and local law, and specifically SLOMC Section 15.48; and (d) Establish an Emergency Response Committee that will develop, implement and monitor procedures for stabilization or demolition of Master List buildings which are damaged by an earthquake or other disaster.. (e) Integrate post-disaster historic preservation with the City's disaster planning and emergency response protocols. 14.01.062 Emergency Response Committee (ERC)established. (a) The Council hereby establishes an "Emergency Response Committee" (ERC). The ERC's membership shall consist of: i) Community Development Director("Director") ii) City Engineer iii)Chief Building Official iv)Eire Marshall pv At +S vi) Citizen Architect or Engineer �— (b)The Council, upon the recommendation of the Committee shall appoint members under subsection (a)(v) and (a)(vi), and shall appoint alternates for both positions. Committee members shall serve on a volunteer basis for 2-4 year terms. (c) City officials on the Committee may be represented by their designees. The ERC shall meet as needed, and shall be convened by the Director. All decisions shall require a majority vote of the quorum of ERC members. A quorum shall consist of four Committee members. (d) The citizen architect or engineer should be knowledgeable in historic building construction and preservation methods,to assist the City and owners of historically-listed buildings. (e) The citizen architect or engineer should be registered as a Disaster Service Worker with the Office of Emergency Services. 14.01.063 Provisions and fee waiver. Sep 1710 08:17a Jan Howell Marc 805-541-2716 p.7 .attachment $ Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Histo Presmvatim Ordinance Page 16 If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster,the following provisions shall guide actions of the City and owners of Master List properties. City development review and permit fees for restoration or reconstruction of Master List properties may be reduced or waived by the City Council to facilitate preservation of significant historic resources and to expedite recovery£rola the disaster. 14.01.064 Stabilization of historic buildings. Within the first 90 days of a disaster, the City shall work with the property owners.and all agencies concerned for the shoring and stabilization of Master List buildings that the ERC or Chief Building Official determines to be hazardous buildings. The fallowing provisions shall apply unless waived by the Council: (a) As per SLOMC 15.48, placards shall be used to identify buildings the Chief Building Officer determines to be restricted or unsafe to occupy. In addition, buildings on the Master List of Historic Resources that are determined to be restricted or unsafe to occupy shall be clearly labeled by the City with the words "Master List Historic Building- This Placard is not a Demolition Order" (b) Members of the ERC shall be "on-call' as stated in Section 14.01.062(e), and should be able to assist isaster personae and advise owners on emergency stabilization measures for Master List resources,consistent with City authority granted by law under emergency conditions. (c) City shall maintain a list of qualified architects and engineers, and make the list available to owners of Master List resources, to assist in preparing shoring and stabilization programs. (d) Owners of Master List resources shall submit a written report prepared by a qualified architect or engineer, outlining shoring and stabilization measures to be taken to the ERC for review and recommendation to the Chief Building Official for approval. (e) Members of the ERC, owners of Master List buildings, and owners' representatives shall ve physical access to hazardous Master List buildings, at the Community Development Director's discretion, to recommend appropriate shoring and stabilization measures to be undertaken to the Chief Building Official. (f) Stabilization actions should occur within the time period specified by the ERC. A construction permit shall be obtained for stabilization actions, unless the requirement is waived by the City or is exempt from permit requirements. 14.01.065 Demolition of historic buildings. If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster, demolition of the structure may be authorized Sep 1710 08:18a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-2716 p.8 AffacfrP7 ent 8 Ordinance Ne.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 18 t) As a condition of any permit to demolish a Master List building or portion thereof that remains after a disaster, the owner shall provide photo-documentation to the Director showing building setbacks from property line, floor area, height, exterior architectural details, but7ding form and materials, in a form acceptable to the CHC. V-&-Olnlmed 4b The ERC-eweW shall use photo-documentation to determine-if any architectural features should be saved for reuse on the reconstructed building. if the property owner is aAW aw unable to save the identified architectural features,the City �¢ may, at its option, store the features fnr later use, consistent with Historic L.�N , ( q Preservation Program Guidelines,with the agreement of the property owner. Cost f r ✓-1! ,J of City storage of the features ifany will be borne by the property owner. d G w SF iii} The ERC reserves the right to consider third-party assessments of the structural condition of the Master List building prepared by qualified professionals. 14.01.066 City assistance. To assist owners of buildings on the Master List of*Historic Resources with stabilization, restoration and reconstruction work,the City shall: (a)Maintain photographic records of the exteriors of Master List buildings. (b) Give priority to the processing of applications and the issuance of building permits for restoration and rcoonstruction work. (c) Provide and distribute information brochures to local disaster personnel and Master List building owners with information describing funding sources, policies, and laws applicable to historical buildings, seisnic hazard mitigation and response strategies, and historic preservation measures following a disaster.. (d) Make available any of the applicable benefits listed in Chapter 4 of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 14.01.070 Non-Compliance With Provisions 14.01.071 Severability 14.01.072 Legal authority and.enforcement 14.01.073 Enforcement 14.01.074 Historic Property Protection Standards 14.01.07 f- 44 0"%Historic and cultural resources trust fund P�kS a3�r Sep 171008:18a Jan Howell Marx 8057-541-2716 p.9 � I Attachment g ordinance No.(22010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 19 14.01.0715everability. Should any section or other portion of this ordinance be determined unlawful or-unenforceable by a court or competent jurisdiction, the remaining section(s) and portion(s) of this ordinance shall be considered.severable and shall remain in full force and effect. r + el,/ e a--\. ✓rte 14.01.072 Legal auity thorand enforcement. /7 a o �vt= A. Authority.' 'The Director, Chief Building Official, City Attorney, 31ture lerileg& Geese, Council and their designees are hereby authorized to enforce the provisions of this ordinance. B. Fees. Council shall, by resolution, establish the fee(s) for applications and submissions made pursuant to this ordinance; fines, and fees for non-conformance with this ordinance and adopted �( Historic Preservation Program guidelines. C. Time to correct. Director shall provide ritten notice of no mpliance t property owners: tea✓�^� Notice shall be by certified mail or other ethod approved y the City a orncy. Following receipt of notice, property owner shall have days to come t the violatio Additional time to correct the violation may, be allowed by the 1 where appropriate. aR treto corralalf''U' le Viol }° Vn(0rra_ �•z?�Ja•�•' 14.41.073 Enforcement: C ��, o 9^ rvcG, a&-% G� Plirt On/ as .tj� /�..�H�a Q L �,L�. � � A.Violations.Violating the provisions of this ordinance or of the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines,failure to obey an order issued by those authorized to enforce it, or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any discretionary, City approval, certificate or permit issued under��tj this ordinance shall ceasdUatas�• Svs��G F an �rdlyttilil �✓� B. Failure to protect property. No property owner or other responsible party shall cause or permit,by action or inaction, alteration of, damage to, deterioration,or demolition of in whole or part,of any significant features or characteristics of a listed historic property or resource without first having obtained proper city authorization. C. Work stoppage. In addition to any other fines,penalties or enforcement provisions set forth in this ordinance, failure to comply in any respect with an approved application shall constitute grounds for immediate stoppage of the work involved in the noncompliance until the matter is resolved. D. Penalties. The City shall use procedures described in Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code and Administrative Citation Guidelines if any fines are imposed in conjunction with enforcement Sep 17 10 08:18a Jan Howell Marx - 805-541-2716 p.10 f-LLi7.Chment 8 Ordinance No.(2010 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 20 W I (Ij of these regulations. allowing notice and public hearing, the Council, may enforce the following penalliess for iolations of this ordinance: iucl,. is 'U f- 0c t�PiP� (a) Fine. The owner of the listed historic pr ay be assessed a one time fine of up to S10,000 per violation, as established by CounciL In addition, the City may assess a fine ranging from S100 to $5,000 per day,up to a maximum 30 occ d v_e'n7-cr pmp`'��"'� s h4a kgc Gl PP4 j -�v (b) Building permit restriction. City may prohibit the owner(s), successors, or assigns from obtaining a building permit for the subject property for a period of up to five (5) years from the date of violation, unless such permit(s) is for the purpose of correcting a building or zoning code violation or fnr complying with provisions of this ordinance. City shall initiate proceedings to place a deed restriction on the property to ensure enforcement of this restriction. The property owner shall be required to maintain the property during that period in conformance with standards set-forth in this ordinance. I� ,�aY, e C.r`Kj S�+aP-C ,rec�.�d+.e anY S��h ed2e.E 'C�(iOnCarrBc7rlm, ar G�✓+^f�G`a��, , (c)Loss of preservation benefits. Any historic preservation benefits previously granted to the property may be subject to revocation. {d) Restoration required. Any responsible party who demolishes or alters a property or structure in violation of this ordinance may be required to restore the property or structure to its appearance prior to rhe violation to the satisfaction of the Director. This shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any criminal prosecution and penalty, and applicable fines. 40 (e) Other remedies. In addition to any other penalty ar�� zed by law, failure to protect a historic resource may constitute a public nuisance resin ' heissuance of an order that the owner perform the maintenance necessary to comply s-sestiet• Aay�eF1S' � w �auac e be recovere of compeu= e en ga a fines and penalties contained herein are non-exclusive and are in addition to any other remedies the City may have. 14.01.074 Historic Property Protection Standards A.Preservation of listed historic resources. To prevent their deliberate or inadvertent neglect and potential loss, the property owner shall maintain listed historic resources in good repair, preserved against vandalism, unauthorized entry, decay and deterioration, and free from. .structural defects and safety hazards, consistent with the Property Maintenance Standards (SLOMC Ch. 17.17), Community Design Guidelines, and standards as specified herein. PK s-.)3- Sep 1710 08:19a Jan Howell Marx 805._541-2716 p:11 Attachment 8 Ordina=No.(2010series) � 6•f1 �� GPI 72-49 historic Preservation Ordinance s- �✓► Page 21 B. property and building efects. The property owner of a listed historic property shall promptly repair the property f it is found to have any of the following defects which could result in loss of historic integrity of the resource: (1) Building elements in a condition that they may fall or otherwise damage property or injure members of the public. (2) Deteriorated, defective or inadequate foundation, flooring or floor supports causing exterior signs of structural failure, such as those listed in 3,4, and 5 below.. (3)Members of walls,partitions or other vertical supports that split, lean,list or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (4)Members of ceilings or roofs, ceiling or roof supports or other horizontal members which sag,split or buckle due to defective materials or deterioration. (5) Fireplaces or chimneys which list, bulge, or settle due to defective materials or deterioration_ (6)Deteriorated, crumbling or loose exterior plaster. (7) Deteriorated or ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs, foundations or floors, including broken windows or doors. (8) Defective or insufficient weather protection for exterior wail covering, including lack of paint or other protective covering. (9) Any fault, defect or deterioration in the building which renders it structurally unsafe or not properly watertight. (10) Unsecured windows, doors or other openings that allow unauthorized entrance or use of building or site. (11) Excessive trash, debris, un-maintained landscaping or other conditions that in the opinion of the Director or Chief Building Official may pose a public nuisance or hazard, or adversely affect the safety and condition of the property or adjacent properties. C. Imminent threat. If the Community Development Director or the Chief Building Official determines there is an imminent threat to a listed historic or cultural resource,the property owner shall be required to provide urgent measures for the protection of the resource within 72 hours of notification, including,but not limited to the securing of building openings, roof or wall repairs, Sep 17 10 08:19a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-271.6 p.12 Attachment 3 Ordinance Na(2010 series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 22 fencing, site lighting, site clean up, private security services, or other measures deemed reasonable and necessary to protect the resource and public health and safety. D. Demolition by neglect. If the Director, Chief Building Official, or the CHC determines a listed historic or cultural resource is being adversely affected due to neglect, the property owner I or other person having legal custody and control of the resource shall be directed to take actions necessary to repair damage, protect and stabilize the property, and prevent further damage or deterioration. If, in the determination of the Director, Chief Building Official O-L insufficient effort is made to correct the problem within 30 days of written notice to the property 'jl owner,the Director or the Chief Binding Official shall initiate enforcement action. , �. j2c r o ca f•'� er� A's orr e- ArO.IrC 'o + if s4ed Jav;/C� Sj'taQ ✓lot, . �,, P�rai�irn 14.01.075 Economic Hardship. i�2 joC�,, i-+ ca.►�ptr'anro dd' ; 1 If the applicant pr es evidence clearly demonstrating to the satisfaction of the CHC or the City Council that the t"ls action will cause an extreme hardship because of conditions peculiar to Sic�ref�nj the particular structure or other feature involved, the CHC may recommend approval, and the - Council may approve or conditionally approve a demolition or other application to modify a � listed historic resource even though it does not meet one or more standards set forth herein. The J � applicant shall bear the burden of proving the extreme hardship and shall provide substantiation of the claim to the CHC, which shall then make a recommendation to the Council on the hardship request. The CHC is authorized to request that the applicant famish additional information, documentation and expert testimony, the cost of which shall be paid by the applicant, to be considered by the Committee in its related findings. All additional required information shall be provided by a qualified individual or firm d by the Gait- In determining whether extreme hardship exists, the Committee and Council shall �considcr evidence that demonstrates: 1, (a)Denial of the application will diminish the value of the subject property 'so as to leave substantially no value; or (b)Sale or rental of the property is impractical, when compared to the cost of holding such property for uses pitted in the zoning district;or (c)Utilization of the property for lawful purposes is prohibited or impractical;or (d)Rental at a reasonable rate of return is not feasible. 14.01.080 Historic and cultural resource preservation fund established. The Historic and Cultural Resource Preservation Fund ("Fund') is hereby established to provide for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic and cultural resources in the City of San Luis Obispo. The Council shall provide the policy direction for expenditures from the Fund. P ks -c 3 Sep 1710 08:20a Jan Howell Marx 805-541-2716 p.13 Aitax—lhmer t g Ordinance No. (20 10 Series) GPI 72-09 Historic Preservation Ordinance Page 23 A. program Administration. The Director shall administer the Fund,following specific procedures and funding priorities adopted by the Council. B. Purpose. The purpose of the Fund is to provide funds for historic preservation projects within the City. All funds deposited in the Fund shall be used for the conservation, preservation, restoration and rehabilitation of historic or cultural resources,as provided in this section and as directed by the Council 1. Financial Administration. Financial administration of the Fund shall be by the City Finance Director or his designee, in accordance with State and local lay. Any interest earned on the fund shall accrue to the funds, unless Council specifically designates such finds for another purpose. 2. Grants, Gifts and Donations_ The Finance Director shall deposit into the fund -any grants, giftsdonations, rents, royalties, or other financial support earinarked by Council for historic or cultural resource preservation. C. Cultural Heritage Committee Role. The Committee shall advise the Council on the Fund regarding: 1. Criteria for use and award of funds; 2. Entering into any contract,lease, agreement, etc. for use of funds; 3. Any other action or activity necessary or appropriate to achieve the Fund purposes and the intent of this ordinance. D. Uses of Fund. The Fund may be used for: 1) the identification and protection of cultural resources, including preparation of historic surveys and design guidelines,2) for the repair, restoration,rehabilitation, preservation and maintenance of historical buildings, features, or archaeological sites, 3) for public education on cultural resources, 47 fal Iced limme, Vwehfte, , or 5) any other purpose approved by the Council provided that Council r -y �C��'` determines such actions are necessary to preserve the resource and in the best t� y ti interests-of the City. Council decisions on the use of funds are final. �"� >E Loans and Grants. The Fund may be used, upon Council approval and recommendation by the Committee, for loans and grants to public agencies, nonprofit organizations and private entities to carry out the purposes of this ordinance. F. Preservation Agreements. Loans, grants or other financial assistance shall require execution of an agreement between the City and the recipient to ensure that such RECEIVED RED FILE SEP 17 1010 MEETING AGENDA SLO CITY CLERK DA 12i io ITEM vcouncl � m m an n E o� cru city of santuis osispo, aammistuatiorrbepStitment I �► �IAtL DATE: September 17, 2010 COUNCIL CDD DIR ,GA9 (_P1 FIN DIR TO: City Council A O NE" PWED CHIEF IICLERK/ORIG ;Z POLICE CHF FROM: Michael Codron, Acting Assistant City Manage0y l DEPT HEADS V REC DIR �JRUh1C_ [Z HR LDIR DIR VIA: John Mandeville, Community Development Director �._ 1� we'JTMES CCuauL By: Kim Murry, Deputy Community Development Director Sto C'T� 1JE:"5 CH SUBJECT: Historical Preservation Ordinance Reference Documents(PH-5) Council person Marx requested information related to several items. Staff is providing this information to all Council members in the event similar questions arise. Below,please find a link to the 2007 staff report to the Council that resulted in a General Plan amendment affecting Downtown Building Heights. htti)://www.slocity.org/cityclerk/aizendas/2007/020607aaVi)hl uamendbIdgheight.pdf The CHC requested staff assessment of the City's eligibility to become a Certified Local Government on 8/27/07. The link to that staff report is provided below. htti)://www.slocity.orgJcommunitydevelopment/culturalherit/stafP%2Oreports/0827072.pdf The CHC Whitepaper is attached for Council review. Finally, Council person Marx requested clarification if TDCs are addressed as part of the proposed documents. Chapter 4 of the proposed Guidelines describes possible incentives and benefit programs for historic resources. One of the listed possibilities is the use of TDCs and is described under 4.1.7 (copied below). For clarification, the CHC intended this option to be available City-wide subject to Council approval. 4.1.7 Transfer of development credit. For projects that preserve cultural or historic resources on site, the City may enter into an agreement to transfer development credit or density to another appropriate site proportional to the commercial floor area or number of dwellings possible to develop under current zoning if the resource were removed. GASta81Codron%Counci1 Memo Histode.dot ATT The Status of Historic Preservation in the City of San Luis Obispo 1. 'Summm Beginning in the early 1980s,the City of San Luis Obispo inaugurated a program formalizing and adopting policies that addressed historic and prehistoric cultural resources. The first of the City's historic districts were formed, and the City Council created the Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC). The City subsequently adopted numerous policies in its General Plan that addressed the preservation and protection of historic and prehistoric resources. Today, after the lapse of nearly 20 years, it can be said that the City of San Luis Obispo has experienced measurable success with its historic preservation _ efforts.' Most notably, the City has purchased and partnered in preservation of the Butron, La Loma and Rodriguez Adobes, and has initiated a Mills Act Program. However,the City continues to Icee historic resources because . inconsistencies and loopholes in City ordinances fail to protect them Billy. Nor is the•City taldng full'advantage of its cultural resources,which are often viewed as mstm ding in the way of progress° rather than being considered valuable and significant factors that contribute to the City's character, GvabTrty, and economic vitality. Ultimately, it is the loss of historic,.cultural and archaeological resources that will result in a decline in the uniqueness of this community and make it less desirable as a place in which to reside,work or visit. While there are numerous considerations including economic development, housing, recreation,the environment,transportation, and the like, a development model cannot be based on what might be successful in other communities that lack the historic and unique character of this city. As we proceed into the twenty-first century,it Is prudent to look beyond the horizon to anticipate problems may roe ahead. Throughout Califomia, older established neighborhoods are feeling the pressure of growth and witnessing the creation of°monster houses.° Commercial areas are feeling the Impact of an expanding economy and booming development. °Underutilized°sites with i historic resources are often prime targets for redevelopment projects,with the resultlrig loss of arose resources. San Luis Obispo has already experienced some of these same pressures, and it is logical to predict that we will continue to face similar challenges In the now future. Actions can and should be taken to address these Issues todi}y, so that the City can avoid the heated conflict and controversy that is often generated when ambiguous or unresolved issues To help prepare for these challenges,we recommend that the City council take the following actions: 3-3 TTACHMENT 1. Revise the City's regulations and poiides to comply with current State , laws and regulati ns. 2 Institute training for staff and advisory bodies regarding the provisions of CEQA regarding Historic resources and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. 3. Promote and ad rocate"Heritage Tourism"as a valuable asset in marketing the 4. Develop a recog ittion award program for contributions to protect Historic resources. 5. Provide addition I funding for consultant assistance to inventory the City's potentially Histol is resources. Ii. Backctround San Luis Obispo has a rich cultural heritage and an informed citizenry who have valued and protected ti red heritage. As with many areas of the country in the 1970s and 80s,the Ise ues of historic preservation in San Luis Obispo found a larger voice as several projects threatened the fabric of some of the historic areas and neighborh . Special interest was focused on the commercial downtown area and th "old town"Victorian neighborhoods. The historic preservation movem in the City focused on the creation of°historic distrkW and the first three we created: Downtown, Old'town and Mill Street. In the 1990s a portion of the town District was re-designated as the Chinatown Historic District and a onion of the Old Town District was combined with an additional area to cre a the Railroad Historic District. . The City also created lists of historic properties—the Master Ust of Historic Properties,.and the uting Property List. The Master List contains the most important examples o San Luis Obispo's amhaeological, cultural, and historic. resources, and also ntains structures associated with important personages, designers, or periods. our history. The Contnbutmg Property list contains properties that are Im ortart due to their contribution to the character of a historic district, neighborhood or the City as a whole, but In and of themselves are not individually significan . The City Council also created the CHC as an advisory body whose purpose was to identify and p the historic resources of the city.At that time the primary duty of the CHC was o inventory historic resources In the City and to recommend fomrab of new historic districts. This remains a major component of the CHC's work t ay. , 34 1 1� AT- ftHMENT •' . The City also underscored the importance of historic and pre-historic resources in its General Plan by including specific policies aimed at protecting these resources including provisions in the: Land Use, Housing, Open Space, Conservation and Parks&Recreation Elements. 111. Recommendations The City has established plans and policies regarding Historic preservation. The process for dealing with properties within Historic Districts or on the City's historic lists is dearly defined. The process for-nominating and including properties on the City's lists stresses cooperation from property owners, and,thus receives substantial support from property owners. However,there are also some weaknesses in the City's current procedures: A. vocal/Static Rules Ing gfrsetences—Recent court cases and changes in state law,primarily the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) have created a situation in which local and state law may not bec onsistent. CEQA now requires that any structure over 50 years old#0 may be affected by a project, be evaluated to determine if it is°historic°based on the criteria presented in the CEQA Guidelines. If it is,the effects of a project must be evaluated and the impacts mrtkgated, State law provides that local°lists"of historic properties can be used as a short list to determine if a structure is historic, but the absence of a stnucture.from such a fist does not mean it is not considered historic (it may mean it has never been evaluated). In addition, the definition used to place a structure on a local list may not reflect the current definition in CEQA. The City regularly relies on its fists to determine If a project may affect historic resources, but often stops at that step in its evaluation. The CHC is sometimes consulted to determine if an unlisted structure may have historic significance. However, in these cases,the Information presented is often minimal. Rather than the CHC reviewing information prepared for an Initial Study (e.g. historic resource analysts),the CHC is used in lieu of doing the primary historic research and analysis. • i .A second conflict may emst with the demolition regulations when a process is laid out that would seem to allow demolition of a Master list structure. Demolition of a Master Let Structure, assumed to be a"historic"resource by the State's guidelines,would by the'States rules seem to require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report(EIR) in most cases, This isnot reflected In the current demolition.regulations and may mislead some property owners as to a significant"ridden°step in the process. 3-7 ATTRMNT ..I A third confectre around the requirement in CEQA that the"...whole of , an action...° be con idered in the evaluation of a project Since demolition of non-listed properti is ministerial (thus exempt from CEQA),a-process has evolved where new fevelopment is occurring in a two step process. First the application for demc lition of affected structures is received (and eventually approved), and ther the application for the new development is submitted. This exempts the re Aew of the demolition of any potentially historic structures from review and pro wWn of the CEQA requirements. Two recent.examples of this process are t ie Pacific Home Do-it redevelopment, and the New Times development This raises a potential legal question as to whether the City is allowing a pn ject to be"split'thus violating the requirement In CEQA to review the whole 3f an action. Recommended Actio 1. Direct the unity Development Director and City Attorney to examine city regulations, 'cies and procedures in light of current state regulations. If ,amendments in regulations should be recommended t the appropriate bodies to rectify any conflicts.. 2. Consider preps n of a Historic Resources Element,or Historic Preservation O nce as a vehicle to clarrf)r process and polices. 3. Direct the Com unity Development Department to fuUy.evaluate potential historic resou as required by CEQA. B. Demoli to R u 'ons—The City's demolition regulations set procedures that must be folio by property owners wishing to demolish.any building over 50 years old. f a building Is over 50 years old,the CHC is notified of the request for a demo ition permit, and the property ownermust.advertise the stricture as to for possible relocation and photo-document the structure per the standards. If a property is on the Master or Contributing Property List, a pi must be submitted for review of the CHC and ARC with a required frnpng of ARC regarding the feasibility of rehabilitation of the structure, and coin atibility of the new structure within the neighborhood The regulations p a measure of certainty of the process for property owners and developers b provide little protection for strictures that may be historic, . but have not yet evaluated for nomination to either of the City's fists. RerAmmended 1. Direct the Com unity Development Director and City Attorney to examine City regui ' , policies, and procedures m light of current state regulations.Trdlicstruchires. ,amendments in regulations should be recommendThe bodies to.rectify any conflicts. 2. Direct the Cvelopment Director to prepare revisions to the j demolition rat provide more consistent protection to j potentially h 3-8 EMT C. lnventodes—Many of the older parts of town were inventoried in the 1980s, and structures that at that time met the criteria were added to the lists. Since then no comprehensive survey has been conducted,with the exception of the Mt. Pleasanton—Anholm neighborhood. Properties were added through recommendation of property owners, CHC members, or staff. However, related to the demolition regulation discussion above, the CHC has found belf repeatedly faced with demoiition requests of structures that have never been Inventoried or evaluated for historic listing. This has created a°reactive° erode rather than a"proactive mode. A station has been created In which the CHC Is constantly wondering where the next demolition request will arise and has had the effect of.diluting the time necessary to complete any comprehensive survey. Much of the time is spent evaluating the next "emergency.' If the demolition regulations as currently written are to provide some protection for historic resources,the Inventory(and review of previous Inventories), and subsequent nomination to the City lists become increasingly important.- Recommended mportant._Recommended Actions: 1. Provide additional funding for consultant help to inventory the City's -potentially historic resources. D. Educretian of Staff and Commissions—The recent changes in State law have, In effect,created a"newt'set of rules for dealing with historic resources. The State and many community are moogniang.-a broader definition of "historic"including streetscapes,signage,and landscaping.There Is increased focus on use of the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures (SOI Standards)to analyze changes to historic structures and to develop adequate mitigation measures. Staff and decision-making bodies are currently•basing decisions and findings on a limited understanding of the requirements and provisions of these laws. In addition, historic resource regulations have become and will continue to become increasingly complex,especially as State and local regulations collide. Recommended Aeffam: 1. Direct the Community Development Director to institute training for staff and decision-making bodies(i.e., Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission) on the provisions of CEQA and the SOI Standards. E. Heritage Tourism/Educ aftn—The City has recently received the Great American Main Street Award from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. In addition, Sim it magazine's recent designation of San Luis Obispo-as 13W Downtowns (m the West)was awarded in part because of Its"historic fabric.'Yet,those.in charge of promoting the City seem, at best,to ignore this aspect of the City and, at worst,,seem willing to sacrifice it if development or ! parking Interests are at stake. The focus on heritage tourism should be ® j 3-9 TAG Increased Incorpo 'ng this even into development projects such as the ' Copeland's project ouId be encouraged. ' With the Copeland'i example, If the project proceeds as planned,the project will unearth (for all t see)the largest slice of the City's that has yet been seen. Significant hi 3toric and prehistoric artifacts will be encountered. With help from local gTd , the necessary archaeological Investigations could become a major for tourists as well as kxl residents and school groups. The entimmunrly should be educated as to howthe historic fabric of the comty plays an important role In the character of the city we all cherish. Recommended Actio is. 1. Request that th Downtown Association and Promotional Coordinating Commission mc ude heritage tourism and a focus on historic resources as potential points of the City. 2. Direct the Corru iunity Development Department to consider heritage tourism opportu iffles as potential mion measures for large projects that may affect cultural resources. F. RMSnition A —The City may want to consider recognizing projects and individuals wh have made the extra effort to contribute to the preservation of his oric resources. This would be a way of encouraging future , projects to make tt a extra effort in dealing sensitively with historic resources. Recommended Acd4 Pris. 'l. Direct staff to Y ork with the CHC and appropriate City departments to develop a row ptition award program for contributions to protect historic resources. V. Conclusion The National Trust fo Historic Preservation has recognized San Luis Obispo as a°Distinctive on',the only in California so rec ognize& The revival of the Cityrs economy and ' increasing populaiy as a tourist destination Is due, at least in part,to t s h' oris nature,character and appearance. The.resources that contain these are becoming increasingly valuable as time and progress take their toll. It is to keep In mind that these resources are non- renewable. When are gone,they're gone forever. The time has come preserve and protect the Cityrs significant historical resources of all : residential,commercial, and industrial. We should assure that time resources reflect the full spectrum of San Luis Obispo's cultural heritage—from the a'nate Victorian residences of prominent dtbws to the modest structures of the working classes. The Cultural Heritage Commixtee's recommendations wi i go a long way toward ensuring the continuing quality of life 340 r o _ that we have come to associate with visiting, living in and doing business in San Luis Obispo. We should err on the side of conservatism in the fate of historic structures so San Luis Obispo continues to be In the words of the National Trust, "...a striking alternative to Anyplace, USA" i I 3mll RECEIVE® SEP 2 0 2010 From: ANCARTER@aol.com [mailto:ANCARTER@aol.com] SLO CITY CLERK Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 9:20 PM To: Dietrick, Christine; Lichtig, Katie; Mandeville, John; Murry, Kim; Cano, Elaina Subject: Preservation Ordinance&Guidelines -- Recommended Changes BCC to Council, Here are some changes to the Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines which I plan to recommend on Tuesday night. Andrew Carter 1283 Woodside Drive San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-594-1906 RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DA IV ITEM #-2h t P'COUNCIL ,� CDD DIR z GACG 04 FIN DIR 1ZASAB " FIRE CHIEF 0 ATTORNEY PW DIR CLERK/ORI a POLICE CHF 0 PT HEADS REO DIR 3UTIL DIR Z HR®IR 41 Qew'r►ti£S L- Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Attachment 4 June 28,2010 review and recommendation to the Chief Building Official for approval. (e) Members of the ERC, owners of Master List buildings,and owners' representatives shall have physical access in hazardous Master List buildings, at the Community Development Director's discretion,_to recommend appropriate shoring and stabilization measures to be undertaken to the Chief Building Official. (f) Stabilization actions should occur within the time period specified by the ERC. A construction permit shall be obtained for stabilization actions, unless the requirement is waived by the City or is exempt from permit requirements. 2.68.065 Demolition of historic bulldhi s. If a Master List resource is damaged by a disaster,demolition of the structure may be authorized under the provisions of the California Building Code(CBC)and under following provisions: The issuance of a demolition permit is governed by the provisions of this ordinance, which shall serve as local amendments to the procedures contained in the CBC_ Removal or destruction of any character-defining feature of a Diaster List building, as determined by the Director or Chief Building Official, constitutes a demolition.. Recommendations regarding stabilization methods and emergency demolition shall be made by the ERC. (a) Within 90 days of the initial date of the disaster;demolition permits shall not be issued unless the Director or Chief Building Official, upon the recommendation of the F.1tC, determines thatT earlier demolition is necessary to: i)eliminate an imminent,demonstrable threat to human life and/or undamaged property on adjacent streets or sites;or ii)provide access for emergency vehicles and ersonnel where no aftemative route or service strategy is eya& Me+ %/v (b) After 90'calendar days following the initial date of the disaster, the issuance of demolition permit fora Master List building is subject to the normal permit processing procedures for demolition or rblooation of...historic buildings. The CHC shall make a recommendation to the Architectural Review.Commission regarding demolition of Master List Buildings. To recommend approval of a demolition permit application,the CHC must determine that: i) The historic resource is a hazard to public health or safety, and repairs,stabilization, preservation or rehabilitation is not shvetmegy feasible.Deterioration resulting from the neglect 4V or failure of the owner to maintain the property need not be considered in making this finding. The applicant shall provide one or more structural reports to document that repairs or stabilization are not feasible. - 15- City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Prt%Tr vation Frograrn Guidelines AttaClihmertt June 2010 3.6 Demolition of Historic Resources 3.6.1 Intent, It is the intent of the City that listed Historic resources are a-a ir:eplaceable community resource that merit special protection. to preserve them for future generations; raid shall not be demolisbed unless Council makes all of the findings listed under Section.. 3.6.4. 3.6.1 Demolition review. Tae CHC shall revim, and make recommendation to die Director. AI2C or City Council concemirg demolition applications for structures listed in the Inventory•of Historic resources. 3.63 Demolition thresholds. Demolition permits for structures which are included on The Inventory of Historic resources snail be required for: (a)Alterations to the resource involving greater than.25%of the original building framework, roof,and exterior malls; and (b)Removal of greater than 25%of any building's f amewot,*roof, and exterior wails; and (e)Relocation of such resources to a site outside the city limits. These thresholds shall net apply to repairs to lisfed'bistoric resources when the CHC or the Director determine such work is consistent with the Sectetaiy of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Pistoric.Prcperties and with these'=uidelines: 3.6.4 Required findings for demolition of a historic resource. The City Council shall approve an application for demolition of s_strucan•e listed in.the Inventory of Historic Resources only if Council determines that: (a) The bistoric resouice:is a hazard io public health or safety, and repairs or stabiliztttion is not feasible. Dkeriorat:on resulting from the property owner's neglect or failure to +® I maintain the property should not be a j.stification for demolition, The applicant mar be required to provide structural reports, to the approval of the Community DevOoprnent Director or City um Council,to docent that repairs or stabilization are not feasible; and (b) The proposed deraQlitioa is consistent with the General Flan; and (c) Denial of the application will deprive the property ow=ner of°X economicallv vi4ble use o: 46 the property, after application of thu-mcial, land use and other incentives available to the property. 3.6.5 Demolition tinning. Cit}' regulations provide for a 40-day waiting period before demolition of a listed 'historic resource to allow consideration of alternatives to preserve the building through relocation andtor property trades. The Chief Building Official shall no- issue a permit for demolishing a historic resource until: a) public notice requirements in the City i -21 - ��(�� Ci y of San Luis Obispo-Dua$1 tistorc Presen afion Program Guidelines June 2010 Demolition and Building Relocation Code have been met, b) a construction pernit is issued for a replacement building, and c) all permit fees for the new development are paid. Where no nQw development is proposed, the property owner shall provide to the Director's satisfaction, financial guarantees to ensure demolition plans and.conditions of approval are implemented. 3.6.55 Exceptions. In the event that a iisted historic resource may pose an immincrit demonstrable threat to human life and safety, the Chief Building Official may disrag rd the 90- day waiting period and issue a permit for demolition. 3.6.6 Historic and architectural documentation. Before the issuance of a demolition permit for structures listed in the inventory of Historic Resources, the resource and its site shalt be documented as specified in City standards, to the satisfaction cif the CIBC and the Director. The documentation shall be retained in a securebut publicly accessible loeaiion.. 3.6.7 Historic acknowledgement. An acknowledgment of demolished resources shall he provided through historic signage and/or the reuse or display of historic materials'and ar ifaets on site,at the oumer's expense,to the Director's approval. 3.6.8 Code requirements.Demolitions shall follow standards and procedures in the Demolition and Building Relocation Code and California Building Code as locally amended. 3.6.9 Expiration of demolition approval.Demolition approval of a listed historic resource shell expire two years after its date of approval unless a building pennit bus been issued and construction has begun. A one year extension may be gra-ntcd by the Director. Additional time extensions shall require ri:applicat c+n to,and approval by the CIBC. 3.7 Relocation of ff s'Oric Resources. Relocation has the potential to a(lversely afFect.the significance of a historic resource:and is discourageci;-ew•ep�;r '*is�;^„.?u}f „ � 9', -•'- - • . Relocation _ applications shall be evaluated as follows:..: (a) Review The CHC and ARCH shall review applications to relocate structures listed on the Inventory of Historic Reso*.urces. (b) Criteria for sclocatlofi. Relocation of structures included on the Inventory of flistoric Resources; or those that are determined by the CIBC or the Director to be potentially historic., is the least preterred preservation method and shall be permitted only when- 9 i Z-%C (1) The relocation will not. -d ; change destroy, or adversely affect the $ historic. architectural or aesthetic value of the resource; and Pres on e ce e is p y Bible reloc is 0 easible on t nst7e- prese - on of :esou c , d City of San Luis Obispo-Draft Historic Preservation Program Guidelines t,t"aUh1 P# 7 June 2010 ia,U:�a crs+3."k (i) Relocation will not a rely affect the character of the historic district where the resource is located or at its proposed location,and vls2crw_ (ii)The original site and the proposed receiving site are controlled through ownership �OC� long term lease or similar assurance by tate person(s)proposing relocation, to the Director's approval,and (iii)The proposed receiving site is rein-ant to the resource's historic significance and the relocation will pose no adverse impacts to the surrounding property, and (iv)Relocation is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan, any applicable area or specific plans, and these Guidelines, or c r non ' nee San,; to tree t a_tot an?era nditio the. m no o m fo , orre the co ton are J sible (c) Relocation timing. The bistoric resource ilmll not.be relocated unless the Chief Building Official issues a permit for relocation and all permit of ja npact. fees for new development are paid; or where no new development is proposed, an appropriate security is posted to guarantee that relocation plans are implemented,t6 ttie Director's approval:,_: (d) Historical and architectural documentation: Prior to issuance of a construction permit for relocation, the resource and its site shall be i istorically, docuinettted as specified in these Guidelines,to the satisfaction of the CHC and t#p:Eiirector. Alt acknowledgrncnt of Ox resource, such as a pernanenL weatherproof historic plaque sl.all'be incorporated on the resource's original site as provid4q*by the applicant or property otivner,subject to the approval of the CHC. (e)Relocation plan and 1 Y reduces "Belocations'shall follow a plan approved by the CHC or the Director, standards and pT± cedures'ti the %lemoliuon and Building Relocation Code, the California:Huilding'Cade;and the°following: ! lication fol,(1�:�Fp shall be made on forrts provided by the Department an;; ' " shall include infotination to respond to the criteria in Section 3.3(b). (2) The011C shall liald a noticed public hearing and recommend action to tyle ARC or City CbPricil ori"ihe application for relocation 4a=dc==tb= of a historic resource, 0 and the ARC or Council shall consider the Cf1C's re-cornmeada?ion in making the final determination to approve or deny the permit. (3) 1 h or th ty Council will no t an approval a relocation listed Historic ce unless one ur °. ollowin-Nvo gs can be m• (i) The resa is a hazard Ua tc health or saf and repair or s :tzati-m is . stntcurally feasi . Deterioration r ting from then ect or fain the owner to retain the pro will not be co ' ered a b for '1 -23 - I 1 w. w .,.w. c--;�4ttbr tri.• l� R, 8 SV ➢S T 1 �f♦�\> r +.,ni"-'y.Avwn _ f `'hY.x ��.N• �f kn"1•�' c.��P , 30• r ,zn s•-s ".,kry.tga,,,, _. h i.b k„c f .r.:a iia yy f T'�J �` ,3Y�¢r.'v7yvf� c4 3'iY.Y'.r✓e'• .•`L�a�YAit _ L�d'1. y'7II:S. i• ��' _12 �. � o... __ / 'I i I I • I ' REC,AVED aW- 6 6 L .. SEP 20 2010 JVCOUNCIL CDD DIR 8A15'CM FIN DIR SLO CITY CLERK RED FILE A�Ae � FIRE CHIEF 9/18x2010 JZJ ATTORNEY PW DIR MEETING AGENDA JZI CLEMORIG POLICE CHF ❑ DEPT HEADS REC DIR TO: E �2�I10ITEM # UTILDIR M San Luis Obispo DAT_r7` f � HR DIR 29 l-_ 990 PalmStreet S� CM San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93401 �1 Subject:: Historic Preservation Update Hearing 9212010 From: Peter 1Uuver Phillips 676 Pismo Street San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93401 This letter constitutes my official issues with the proposed update to the subject Program Guidelines and the establishment of an ordnance promulgating the desires of the City proposers. I do not, nor will not abrogate my rights as a property owner to any committee or subcommittee of the City of SanLuis Obispo, Ca Decisions relating to the loole of my 1890 Victorian two story residence,the landscape materials around it,the interior and exterior spaces in and around it that I enjoy as a propertLoewner will be made by me in thosedecrssor in h of City employees and fine one astronomical amount of money for non-compliance to their timetable,Is an act of cisai�vnaliort,again a�ecific class of property owners at best and probably unconstitutional. 1 do not have the oonvwdent means to run this by legal, but you do and it seems to me that the likely costs of the City's defense of urrplerrrentirg this proposed ordinance should be a consideration in it's acceptability as a desired thing for the greater good of the community. I can understand the City's beef with deadbeat property owners that treat the much rreeded irrents to their buildings as a loss from their annual bottom line. However, in my daily walks with me Dally licensed dog, l see these rundown Oust res and they are of various architectural vintages rather than just Victork . it seems m this citizen that maybe 8 beiber approach,ti this pnnot igyaur opinlon be handled through existing ordinances, would be ip wok war owners and maybe em fntives like tax deferments or kwv cost loan avar for the desired� a has not been proved in afi of this effort is the meed f�sudh an ordirr�oe and a hen�rgor of us Victorian owners th disaes cannon goad and oomrnon means of Win. A for instance: if your vvdtr� need to provloe incentives for engineered inspections of practical and a means for property owners to amestst in this approach. Tax relief-etc,..until the work is paid for. Earlhqu*n will topple the gloss lipstidc beauty salon school of planning every thine. Save those Victorians. 4 � ' Peter 19uver Phillips IL- RED FILE --- � 0uNC`L�'N 7CDDDR MEETING AGENDA JZeAe Z FIN DIR DATED ITEM #I L SEP 2 0 2010 Z ja FIRE CHIEF — 0 ATTORNEY Z PW DIR From: Ashbaugh, John DEPT HEADS Z REC DIR SLO CITY CLERK CLERK/ORIG Z POLICE CHF Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:18 AM To: Mandeville,John; Murry, Kim %_194Au jZ( HRI D RIR Cc: Lichtig, Katie; Dietrick, Christine FgiwTin� CZXtwcil_� Subject: Council comments on Historic Resources Ordinance m S-40c"K)EIZ C iL I am very concerned about some of the recommended changes to the Historic Resources ordinance by Councilmembers Marx and Carter. Although some of their recommendations appear to be reasonable, there are some key areas where I differ strongly. Some of the recommendations, if enacted as proposed, could result in seriously weakening the ordinance. I'm also-concerned that some members of the public have shown a disregard for the extensive process of public review conducted by the CHC and the staff to date. The comprehensive update of our historic resources program is a major objective of this City Council, and I recommend that my colleagues pay close attention to Attachment 1, which documents the record of of public participation conducted by the CHC, ARC and City staff over the past 18 months. I would raise the following specific concerns with respect to the memos issued by my colleagues, and ask that staff respond to this set of concerns as well, where appropriate: 1. Councilmember Marx states several concerns with the process in the body of her memo. Please clarify whether it is indeed a "tradition" for a process such as this to begin essentially with a "blank slate," inviting open-ended "page by page" comment from the residents or from any particular interest group on our existing ordinances and planning documents, prior to the onset of staff work. In my experience, this process may have occurred for some general plan elements, but not for others (e.g.,the Housing Element). Even then, some suitable amount of staff or consultant work must be conducted in order to prepare for any meaningful public participation. As I recall, the Council chose to update our Historic Resources Program in the 2009-11 Financial Plan -however we also specifically chose not to undertake a "historic resources element of the general plan," which would have been much more expensive. Am I mistaken about this recollection? Or, was the Council as a whole, including myself, mistaken in not conceiving of this effort as functionally equivalent to adding an element to our general plan? In either case, it's too late to go back and start all over again, nor would I suggest that any of us consider that option at this point. 2. Councilmember Marx has recommended in item#9 in her memo that this ordinance should apply to "publicly owned resources". She implies that the City has neglected our own responsibility to avoid "demolition by neglect" for our adobes - the La Loma Adobe and the Dana Adobes, in particular. Would the adoption of this ordinance help or hinder our ability to qualify for grants that could enable us to stabilize and rehabilitate these structures?As to the broad question of"publicly owned historical resources," doesn't this ordinance in fact apply to the City's own actions and agencies (e.g., Public Works and Parks/Recreation)? Are we not required under its terms to observe the requirements of the ordinance with respect to CHC review? Finally, does the City have the power to impose this ordinance on the County, school districts,the State of California, or other public agencies with historic resources lying within our jurisdiction?How about Union Pacific RR, PG&E, or other State-regulated utility companies? 2. Councilmember Marx has recommended that violations of this ordinance should not be subject to criminal sanctions, and that admnistrative citation is sufficient. Without criminal sanction- i.e., if we are limited to administrative citation alone- what is the maximum fine or penalty that can be assessed by the City? If the ordinance does not contain the possibility of significant fines based upon a misdemeanor filing, what remedies would be available to the City in the case of a property owner who demolishes a historic resource? Finally, if the ordinance is passed as it has been recommended to us, and a misdemeanor complaint is filed to remedy a serious violation of the ordinance,please outline the steps that are required under Section 1.24 of the Municipal Code (as referenced in 2.68.073(D), including the role of the City Council (if any). 3. Councilmember Marx has suggested that the ordinance "drastically and inappropriately" changes the role of the CHC, and I agree that there are some ambiguities. Please provide specific changes to the wording, if any, that would clarify the advisory role of the CHC; there may be some room for improvement in this regard. As one example, in the definition of"Neglect" (2.68.100#38), I suggest that we revise that to reads "...deterioration, as determined by the Director or the City Council, after appropriate review by the CHC" (or similar wording). A similar modification could be made to 2.68.073(D), pertaining to "Demolition by neglect." 4. Councilmember Marx has objected to the CHC having representation in the proposed ERC. That body would also, however, include a "citizen architect or engineer" appointed by the Council - albeit, with certain qualifications. Personally, I believe that this committee could just as easily include a member of our Board of Construction Permit Appeals as well as a member of the CHC. On the other hand, I am open to the possibility of removing the CHC representative. Since a majority vote is required for action by the ERC, it should have an odd number of members; as proposed, it would be six. Either we should remove the CHC rep, or add a Council-appointed member of our Board of Appeals. 5. Councilmember Marx suggests that the Historical Fund should not be utilized to acquire real property; however, it would seem that such a restriction would preclude the City from achieving one possible way of resolving serious cases of property owner neglect- one that may be satisfactory to all concerned, especially those who are concerned about property rights. We may, for example, need to acquire real property in order to obtain full legal rights to stabilize and rehabilitate the La Loma Adobe. Please comment. 6. With respect to item#8 on Councilmember Marx's memo, is there any circumstance where the Community Development Director's decision with respect to historical resources could overrule a determination of the Council, Planning Commission, or ARC? If so, I do not see it in this version of the ordinance. I believe that it would be advisable to require some public notice, if it is not otherwise required, of a decision by the Community Development Director under this section (14.01.045). Given such notice, it might also be appropriate to provide an opportunity for a member of the public to appeal such a determination to the CHC, and ultimately to the Council. Please comment. 7. Finally, Councilmember Carter has recommended a series of changes to the ordinance that would enable a property owner to claim that it is economically infeasible to protect or restore historic resources. Please explain how the "economic hardship" provision in the ordinance already addresses these concerns. Please comment, as well, about the experience of this city, or other communities, where overly-broad consideration of a claim of"economic infeasibility" has led to the loss or impairment of significant historic resources. I am quite certain that this Council will be able to work through all of the provisions of this ordinance in an atmosphere of reason, with candor, and with full appreciation for the many hours of hard work by volunteers and experts in this community. I await your response to the questions and comments provided herein, and those of my colleagues. Thanks. John B. Ashbaugh San Luis Obispo City Council BCC:CC RECEIVED RED FILE Page 1 of 2 SEP 2 0 2010. ME I G AGER.-_w SLO CITY CLERK. DAT °121 10 ITEM # � /, Attachme_nts can contain viruses that may harm your computer_.Attachments may not display correctly. Council,SloCity From: Buzz Kalkowski[buzdna@charter.net] Sent Sun 9/19/2010 3:50 PM To: Council,SloCity Cc: Subject: from Buzz Kalkowskl- relating to the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines-September 21st meeting i.If 9D CON a4Q)L.. Attachments: D 2010 0901 HIstPreserve.doc(3BKB) ,rG COUNCIL C,d CDD DIR eAE)'(:M FIN DIR Sunday,September 19, 2010 f� ATTORNEY PW D DFIRE IR m CLERK/ORIO POLICE CHF a ❑ DEPT HEADS REC DIR l UTIL DIR Dear Mayor Romero and Council Members, HFA BIR ❑ NEhITMf.S C1ColArJ[.1t- J 4 SLO nTy NCWS a C-M a O"K I am a Cultural Heritage Committee member asking for your support in approving the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines. We recognize the community value in preserving historic and cultural resources. However, not every property owner may place the same degree and respect for properties representing our community's past. One among the many intentions behind the proposed ordinance, is to have effective enforcement ability when the rare and extreme violations occur and the owner-violator chooses to Ignore City notices,or believes a minor penalty is but a small cost of doing business allowing for violation continuance. I can only imagine the apparent political pressure legislative body members experience when a vocal minority expresses pronounced opposition to proposed legislation, particularly In times preceding elections,and during difficult economic times. However, my late-in-life municipal and county code enforcement career(following years of business work experience and business ownership)taught me the Importance of having substantial violation penalties necessary to correct extreme ordinance disregard. In addition to stronger enforcement capabilities,the proposed ordinance provides the community with additional benefits that you are already familiar with. It is with regret that I have an out-of-town commitment during this week,which includes Tuesday,September 21st,and will not be able to attend the Council hearing. I am attaching a copy of"Viewpoint"that I wrote asking The Tribune to print,which they did today,Sunday,September 19d'. I am asking for your support and approval of the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines for the benefit of the community as a whole. https://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/from%2OBuzz%20Kalkowski%20-... 9/20/2010 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Buzz Kalkowski Buzz Kalkowski 2163 Augusta Court San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 Cell phone(my only contact means during the week): 805704-4121 https://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/from%20B uzz%20Kalkowski%20-... 9/20/2010 Letter to the Tribune (for Viewpoint?) I am a Cultural Heritage Committee(CHC)Member volunteer (since September 2009), a San Luis Obispo (SLO)homeowner, and a previous zoning enforcement officer with a Northern California city and with Napa County. I attended the August 26`s Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines workshop hosted by the Community Development Department to listen to community concerns. San Luis Obispo was the 5`s established mission of the twenty-one Alta-California Spanish missions, in 1772, thus one of the very first European settlements in California, and was the 12`s city to be incorporated in California(February 1856 -481 incorporated California cities exist today). The city-placed signs at the entries to San Luis Obispo read: "HISTORIC SAN LUIS OBISPO". The signs are intended to encourage Highway 101 travelers to visit, to see and to experience our heritage; and to spend money in our city. The Mission and many of the historic structures and neighborhoods reflect a well-preserved heritage. SLO was never a city of great mansions. It did and does reflect modest working class homes providing character and history. It is easier and less expensive to maintain character than it is to create community character. Physical history erased is visual history departed. An example of concern that many share: the very first motel in the world, the 1925 Motel Inn, sitting at the east entry to the city was allowed through the years, to wither away to what little remains today. Within the city, examples of historic structures experiencing willful deterioration can be identified. Do we, the citizens, condone the few owners who continue the willful neglect of historic properties to the point of demolition for safety's sake? Do we value our history and unique sense of place created by our historic structures? We, the citizens, need to weigh the facts and then decide to support or discourage the passage of the HPOG at the upcoming City Council meeting on September 21". The main community concern expressed at the workshop related to proposed enforcement penalties, which potentially could be significant. Additional city revenue is not the intent of the penalties. The prime purpose is to preserve officially listed historic resources within the city when a listed building is allowed to significantly deteriorate, possibly willfully, to the point where it becomes a health safety issue and must be torn down. Typically when a violation is brought to the attention of the city, the city provides a written notice to the property, citing the violation along with the specific ordinance section(s) violated, and gives 30 days or so for the owner to work with the appropriate department so that eventual corrections will be made. If an owner is verifiably financially stressed, the proposed ordinance has an economic hardship provision. When an ordinance has minimal penalties, ignoring the ordinance, or paying a minuscule penalty can be an insignificant cost of doing business. An example that I can offer is a property a northern California city where I did Code Enforcement. The property had a small truss manufacturing operation, considerable junk, and people living in junk cars and trucks (with electrical extension cords even running through water puddles). The owner had ignored code violations going back 37 years when the city was able to get a judge to conduct the trial on site. The judge, like previous judges, found the owner in violation, but this judge placed a substantial penalty fine,plus costs. It was at that point that the owner sold the property for nearly $10 million and the property was cleared of violations and junk, and high end apartments were built on the site. The point is that having the ability to assess a significant fine can be a deterrent to those who would allow historic structures to be demolished by neglect. At the workshop one person expressed concerns about the notice given to property owners. Notices of the Historic Preservation Ordinance hearings were all published in the Tribune (It behooves all to read the SLO public notices printed each Saturday within the classified section). In addition, nearly 700 post card notices were mailed to the owners of all historically listed properties for each hearing, and email updates were provided to anyone who expressed interest. Informational flyers were also sent to all owners of historic properties. Truly an effort was made to invite people to participate. At the workshop questions were raised as to what standards are historic properties held. .Virtually all governmental agencies use the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Historic Rehabilitation. • For anyone interested in reading the standards, the website providing the standards is: http://www.nps.gov/histoEy/hps/tos/tax/rhb/stand.htm . • For preservation, restoration and reconstruction purposes use the following websites: http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch stnds 82.htm; http://www.parks.ca.eov/pages/1054/files/standards%20chartl.pdf. Lastly, I want to convey that significant effort and time(more than one year)went into drafting the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines. Our Community Development staff performed considerable research and thoughtful word-crafting in drafting the proposed ordinance. The State Historic preservation Office (SHPO); the SLO Architectural Review Committee; and numerous entities and individuals, including the Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Association, reviewed the proposed ordinance and guidelines and offered comments and suggestions. The CHC conducted numerous meetings to review the draft ordinance and input provided. Changes were made. The best attempts were made to provide our city the best and most fair preservation ordinance possible. Your support of the ordinance before the City Council will be most appreciated. Buzz Kalkowski WD CoN 04[u RECEIVED RED FILE is COUNCIL CDD DIR SEP 2 0 101 MEETING AGENDA �7 ea�s�cM / FIN DIR Ta fcE;k6 4tn1 FIRE CHIEF D AT 421 >O ITEM #� #ATTORNEY PW DIR SLO CITY CLERK CLERK'ORIG POLICE CHF DEPT HEADS REC DIR -R UTIL DIR �. -----Original Message----- ?7URwa I HR DV4 LI _ . , From: anthony krause [mailto:anthonymk04@yahoo.com] [(fc+unluL Sent: Sun 9/19/2010 2:30 PM To: Ashbaugh, John; Carter, Andrew; Marx, Jan; asettle@slocity.or; dromero@slocity.ort Subject: Historic Preservation Program Guidelines Hello Councilmembers and Mayor Romero I'm a property owner in Old Town and have some concerns about the proposed guidelines. While I have made sure that any renovations to my house are consistent with the period (c. 1914) , I'm worried that your proposal is too open-ended. It appears to give the power to city employees, and even the CHC, to order improvements to properties that in my view might not be matters of required maintenance or historical authenticity. Issues of landscaping, foundation cracks, or worn roofing, should remain matters of owner discretion unless the building is imperiled. It is true that there are a few old houses, notably student rentals, that are not in the best repair. I think it is important that these structures be preserved. So I see the point of such an ordinance. But I also believe that my finances and my schedule of when I can do major projects should not be in the hands of the City. If these guidelines are to be made stronger, I believe that repairs that are ordered by the City should only be to prevent threats to the structure as determined by a City-paid licensed home inspector. On a related note, I was hiking up to the Reservoir Cyn Green Space yesterday, past the adobe on Lizzie St in SLO. I was shocked at the state of disrepair of this historical adobe.The one on Dana St. also appears to be quite neglected. These are city-owned structures, are they not? I strongly believe that the City's recent interest in historical preservation should include restoration of these City-owned adobes before it is too late. If there is a move afoot to take better care of them, let me know and I'd be glad to participate in some way. Thanks. Tony Krause -----Original Message----- From: richard greene [mailto:greenerr@att.net] Sent: Sun 9/19/2010 5:33 PM To: Romero, Dave; jashbaurg@slocity.org; Carter, Andrew; Marx, Jan; Settle, Allen Subject: OLD TOWN To the city councel members! In conection with the new proposed city ordinance for the Historic Distrect of S10. I own a house that fall's under this proposel rules and would like to voice my opinion aganst any change in the current Historic rules! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Richard & Ann Greene 654 Buchon St SLO -----Original Message----- From: John Wolcott [mailto:j3o3w3@att.net] Sent: Sun 9/19/2010 4:46 PM To: Romero, Dave; Carter, Andrew; Ashbaugh, John; Marx, Jan; Settle, Allen Subject: Historic Preservation Ordinance I ask that you vote no on the subject ordinance. I live in the Historic District, but not in a "historic" house. The reason for my request is that the public has not been properly notified of the development of the ordinance, the fines are excessive to the point of ludicrous, the enforcement is very subjective and the whole thing is overkill. An article in today's Tribune by one of the authors disputes these points, but I was on the receiving end, he was on the sending end. I was made aware of this ordinance when I questioned Kim Murry about a card I received in the mail three weeks ago. She said to disregard it, it would be replaced with a correct. card. The magazine The Week carries an article reporting that the city of North Port, Florida, is fining a resident $27, 000 for leaving her improperly licensed car in her driveway for four months. The basis for the law is to protect the city's appearance. That's what Buzz Kalkowski cites as the reason for the ordinance. Kalkowski, in his piece, talks about the results of businesses letting their properties go into disrepair. I believe most buildings in. the Historical District are either residences or being made earthquake resistant, which requires close city inspection. In my frequent walks in the down town area I have noticed and taken pride in the huge number of buildings and residences that have been refurbished, painted or remodeled, making the place almost sparkle compared to how it looked 23 years ago. I've seen many homeowners install and replace foundations to the point that most area craftsmen of this skill have left the business. It seems to me that the laws and rules in place have brought about marvelous change and improvement, and that more is not required. Since purchasing my now 100 year old, tear-down house in 1987, remodeling and repairs have required investment of nearly twice the original purchase price. This has been financially draining enough, without some stranger looking over my shoulder and voting on my choices and increasing the costs. I suspect this is true of many of my neighbors. And, like many of them, my plan is to live in the place until I die. John Wolcott 663 Pismo RECEIVED RED FILE,. : (CCUNCIL ¢I CDD DIR MEETING AGENDA Ae C.M FIN DIR SEP 21 2010 [p AeAe 4crl d FIRE CHIEF DATE I 21 LoITEM #-12- XATTCRNEY PW DIR SLO CITY CLERK d CLEMORIO POLICE CHF ❑ QfPT HEADS ASO DIR I EIS UTIL DIR T7�1(SW�E HR DIR -----original Message----- 1 NEJ TMES----- From: Bob Bob Pavlik [mailto:bob—pavlik@dot.ca.gov] D a�IS Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:57 AM To: Murry, Kim Cc: Dan Carpenter; Dunsmore, Phil; Chippendale, Sue Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Kim, thank you for sending this along. I support the Cultural Heritage Committee's proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance and Updated Guidelines. I think they are well researched, well written, thoughtful, and fair. We are only stewards of these resources and should be able to pass them along to future generations in better condition than we found them. It is our responsibility and our obligation to ensure that our history and culture survive us. I hope to be at tonight's meeting, but in the event I cannot attend I wanted to pass along my support for your proposal and thank you all for your hard work in this important regard. Sincerely, Bob Pavlik RECEIVE® _ RED FILE SEP 21 2010 -= MEETING AGENDA SLO CITY CLERK DATF`�I �I�o ITEM # �co1�u�N SIN DoRIR WW WWWWW,IW#MW#4W#WiiWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW#WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW#WWWWWiiiiWWWWWWW ITSVIIFD' 9FIAi CHIEF. . Name: Robert Pavlik ff ATTORNEY PW nip R Address: 493 Woodbridge Street PT CLERIVA ARC DI=CMF 9 1:1 DEPT MEAN f�d t31A City: SAN LUIS OBISPO 7J ?iS---- WTIL DIA State: CA % . L 01AHR DIR Zip: 93401 rd nir-W or,MES Cbq�L- Phone: 781-9728 SLO�t)gws CM Fax: COIL email-from: rayena@charter.net Message: Please convey to the City Council my support for the Cultural Heritage Committee's recommendation to update the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and create a Historic Preservation Ordinance. I have read the staff report and agree, it is needed to preserve and perpetuate our historical resources.We are only stewards of these resources for future generations, we need to leave them in better condition then we found them.Thank you. Robert Pavlik From: Peter Kluver Phillips [mailto:kluver29@att.net] Sent: Mon 09/20/10 1:08 PM To: dromero@solcity.org Cc:jashbaug@solcity.org; Carter, Andrew; Marx, Jan; Settle, Allen Subject: Proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance Your help in defeating this proposed ordinance is requested. It is discriminatory to a specific design type of building and its owner(s), it will be enforced with huge punitive amounts of money with predictable outcomes of loss of their property, investment and the constitutional right of property enjoyment and surely will engender bitter and prolonged litigation. The citizens that will be affected by this one sided barrage of regulation and enforcement have had no opportunity for the formulation process and the promulgation forces have shown no compelling reason for its existence especially in the face of existing codes etc... that are in place to accomplish the same espoused result less the massive fine structure and the policing powers given to City employees . The discrimination issue is an interesting one in that this effort is targeting specific building types and is not a City wide ordinance for the betterment of the whole community. In fact,the betterment issue is of itself a wonder of a question. We, the proposed affected, are free peoples living in a democratic society and understand reasonable process. This proposed ordinance process has missed that point. Please defeat this ordinance in its entirety. Thank you. Peter Kluver Phillips 676 Pismo Street San Luis Obispo, Ca. 93401 I From: Marco Rizzo [mailto:marco@caferomaslo.com] Sent: Mon 09/20/10 1:28 PM To: Romero, Dave; Ashbaugh, John; Carter, Andrew; Marx, Jan; Settle, Allen Subject: Historical Preservation Ordinance Dear Mayor and City Council am concerned about the enforcement language in the Historical Preservation Ordinance that will be voted on Tuesday. I have spoken to more than a few people in San Luis Obispo that are bothered by the proposed wording and I wanted to forward a note stating this. The proposed wording states "...failure to obey an order issued by those authorized to enforce it, or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any discretionary city approval...shall constitute a misdemeanor." (p.17) There are no objective standards. Everything is to be negotiated with community development department staff--including what needs to be done, the time allowed for doing it, and the amount of the fines (up to$10,000 per violation and up to$5,000/day). I feel this city's beauty and its preservation is a high priority. However, we need to make sure we make policy that allows for some balanced solutions instead of this very tough language. Thank you for your time, Marco Rizzo Cafe Roma From:Allan Cooper[mailto:allancoope@gmail.com] Sent: Mon 09/20/10 2:25 PM To: Romero, Dave; Ashbaugh, John; Carter, Andrew; Marx, Jan; Settle, Allen Subject: Letter In Support of Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Mayor Dave Romero dromero@slocity.org 781-7415 John Ashbaugh jashbaug@slocity.org (805) 783-7753 Andrew Carter acarter@slocity.org (805)431-0844 �.l Jan Marx jmarx@slocity.org (805)783-7752 Allen Settle asettle@slocity.org (805)878-7646 September 19, 2010 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: City staff and the CHC have indicated that the new ordinance more clearly articulates penalties and protections which will apply to historically listed properties that are in a state where they are on the path to be demolished by neglect i.e., where the structure has become seriously compromised.Without this ordinance, a property in this condition could be demolished by mandate of the Building Department.With this new ordinance, the City(as a SHPO Certified Local Government)has several options to address the deterioration- primarily through working with the owner to make the necessary corrections but with the provision if necessary, of a substantial fine as a disincentive or, if the resource is very significant, of having the work done and placing a lien on the property for repayment. The accompanying Guidelines also contain provisions which list potential programs the City could use to assist with historic resource conservation efforts including such things as tax credits, grants and earmarked funding from the State. Some local citizens have asserted that properties that fall under the jurisdiction of this new ordinance will be hard to sell and their values will therefore depreciate. Common sense dictates that this ordinance will enhance, not depreciate, the values of those properties that fall within its jurisdiction. Others express dismay that there will be an unfair"higher standard"enforced for the maintenance of historically listed properties.The only higher standard that will apply here will be to help prevent unpermitted demolition, "demolition by neglect'or"post-disaster demolition"of historically listed properties. Finally, there has been a suggestion that substandard properties already fall under the jurisdiction of the International Property Maintenance Code and the SLO Zoning Code. However, these codes'penalties are clearly insufficient to provide a disincentive to demolition through action or inaction. In this ordinance, alteration of more than 25% of an historically listed property, or relocation of same, will trigger the definition of"demolition". This new proviso in the ordinance will give those who are intent on protecting our Downtown's historical character and "sense of place" more"teeth"when the local economy recovers. Based on all of the above arguments, supporters of Save Our Downtown urge you to give serious attention to the importance of this effort and approve the proposed Update to the Historic Preservation Program Guidelines and approve the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. Respectfully Submitted, Allan Cooper, Chair, Save Our Downtown 756 Broad Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 9FCEIVE® 21 2010 RED FILE SEP MEETING AGENDA SLO CITY CLERK DATE U T ITEM # RFS. i council MCMORAn um COUNCIL DATE: September 20, 2010 O�CN 1z CDD I R 12 Ae7kG-t�C(� Z FIN ATTORNEY Z FIRE C CHIEF TO: City Council l�CLERK/0RIG.- PW DIR I,0 DEPT HEADS -;REC POLIDE..CHF IR VIA: Katie Lichtig, City Manager P'�_ 2 T2/Bi�nl ,Z UTIL DIR HR DIR FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development DirectoG% ONW-riMus 0uNOL to scocn+'tia4s 0 BY: Kim Murry, Deputy Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Historic Preservation Ordinance Several red files have been distributed raising questions and providing comments, both from Council members and members of the public. In the interest of providing information that may be important to the public consideration of the draft Historic Preservation Ordinance in a timely manner, staff is providing the following additional information and will be ready to answer questions tomorrow evening. A summary of comments, questions, and requests for information posed to staff is included below, followed by staff's additional input for discussion at the Council meeting. In light of the amount and content of comment on the draft ordinance, staff anticipates that after considering public comments and Council member input tomorrow evening, the most effective approach will be to provide direction to staff to return with changes to the proposed documents at a future date. 1. Fines are way too high. Deterrent should be reserved for historic resources that produce business or rental income (PH5-237). The Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) reviewed fines from other jurisdictions and after considering several options, determined that larger fines were desired in order to provide a greater deterrent to unapproved demolitions (either active or by neglect). There is no magic to the amount chosen other than it reflects the upper limit seen in other jurisdictions and the CHC's determination that current limits to administrative fines at $500 is not enough of a deterrent to be effective. Council may determine that a lower amount is appropriate. While most instances of demolitionby neglect have been experienced in commercial situations, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not distinguish between historic resources that produce income versus those that do not. Demolition of a historic resource poses a significant adverse impact in most instances and it is the unapproved demolition or conditions leading to demolition by neglect that the fines are meant to deter. 2. The ordinance changes therole of the CHC and should not authorize the CHC to become enforcers or to impose penalties. A CHC member does not belong on the —1 - PHS Red file Response Emergency Response Committee (ERC). ERC decisions should be presented to the full CHC for deliberation. The comment raises two related, but distinct issues, one pertaining to the roles of staff, advisory bodies and the Council in the implementation of the ordinance and one pertaining to the role of the ERC in an emergency situation affecting a historic property. With respect to the first issue, the duties of the CHC as defined in the ordinance do not represent a change in the role of the CHC for development review processes or provide more authority than that of a recommending body. However, staff agrees that Section 2.68.072 (Legal authority and enforcement) should be modified to eliminate the CHC and Council as parties charged with enforcement. The CHC and Council are the review and approval bodies for development applications subject to the ordinance, and the Council may serve as the appeals body for certain code enforcement activities, but neither the CHC nor Council would be charged with direct code enforcement duties as the language might suggest. Thus, staff recommends the reference to the CHC and Council be deleted from that section. With regard to the ERC provisions, staff recommends language clarification in the ERC section to reflect that the ERC advises the Chief Building Official. The ERC includes a member of the CHC to provide advice on historic resources after a disaster for buildings that may be in need of immediate action in order to address a stability issue. These types ofsituations cannot wait to be . addressed through the normal review process. Just as the CHC member is not the expert on structural issues, the Chief Building Official (CBO) or Fire Marshall is not an expert on historic issues. The ERC team is intended to bring together various experts to provide a balanced recommendation to the Chief Building Official. The CBO still has the ultimate authority to make a determination. 3. The "time to correct" provisions are harsher than the present provision of Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code. Economic feasibility should be taken into account.. Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code does not specify the time to correct a violation, but instead speaks to the idea of voluntary compliance as the preferred approach prior to assessment of fines. Chapter 1.24 does specify that citations must be paid within 30 days. Staff recommends adding language to the ordinance to refer to Chapter 1.24 of the Municipal Code. The proposed ordinance provision explicitly states that additional time to correct may be allowed by the Chief Building Official in recognition that not all violations may be feasible to correct within 30 days. The CHC discussed the idea of economic feasibility and recommended structural feasibility as the criteria since economic feasibility is already covered under the Economic Hardship provision. In addition, environmental review of a proposed demolition would cover the feasibility of any proposal including economic feasibility. 4. Violation of the ordinance should not be subject to criminal sanctions (misdemeanor). Administrative citation is sufficient. Staff recommends removal of section 14.01.073 on PH5-236. Government code section 36900(a) and City Charter Section 609 provide that a violation of a City ordinance is a -2- misdemeanor, unless.by ordinance it is made an infraction, and there is no need to restate that authority. The City Attorney's office has the discretion to "downcharge" misdemeanor violations to infractions where appropriate and to work with property owners who have demonstrated a willingness to work toward resolution. Where such cooperation cannot be achieved, the criminal misdemeanor complaint represents an important tool of last resort to achieve code compliance. 5. There must be a time limit by which the City lifts deed restrictions from properties after correction or compliance. Agreed. Section.14.01.073D(b) on page PH5-237 specifies that the deed restriction would enforce the building permit restriction for up to five years following a violation unless the owner obtained a building permit to correct the situation. The intent of this section is to provide additional disincentive to unapproved demolition of a historic resource (either active or by neglect). Staff recommends language be added to reflect that the City would record a formal release after final inspection of any required permits or at the end of five years if no permits have been obtained. 6. Historic resources should not be permitted to be relocated except as allowed under CEQA and Secretary of the Interior Standards. Staff agrees with this comment. Relocation is not a preferred alternative, but may be the only alternative to demolition in certain instances (and could potentially serve as mitigation in some circumstances). Section 3.7 of the proposed Guidelines contains language addressing relocation of historic resources, which would need to be done consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's standards. 7. The Historic Fund should not be used for acquisition of real property. The CHC included this provision to provide policy direction to enable use of the fund to acquire. historic properties being offered voluntarily. This section may be deleted without effect if the Council feels it implies something other than intended. Option #5 under "Uses of Fund"allows Council to identify any other purposes that are in the best interests of the City. In addition, the City has.property acquisition and disposal policies that would require Council action to identify such an action as an appropriate use of City or grant funds. 8. The Director's decision regarding CHC review cannot overrule that of the Council, Planning Commission or ARC. The provision under section 14.01.045 is meant to reflect the current practice that allows the Director not to send minor projects to CHC for review if they can be determined to be consistent with historic preservation guidelines and the.Secretary of the Interior Standards. Staff suggests a minor wording addition: "Notwithstanding Section 14.01.040 A-E and G" to address the concern raised. 9. The ordinance should apply to publicly-owned resources such as adobes. Page PHS- 227-228 should be amended to reference publicly-owned adobes. PH5235 edits. 3 The City prioritizes General Funds and seeks grants to address these unique resources in the Community. The City makes its best efforts to maintain the properties in compliance with historic preservation standards, but also must prioritize use of public funds. Just as a private property owner has the ability to ask for relief due to economic hardship, the Council goes through a very public and inclusive priority setting process for the two year budget that assigns funds to community priorities. The City has assigned General Funds to repair and stabilize the adobes over the years. Where possible, grant funds are used for adobe projects. For instance, the City will be using CDBG funds this fall to repair and stabilize the La Loma adobe. Page PH5-227 and 228 refers to resources other than structures — such as gardens and site features. This is not an appropriate place to reference the adobes. The adobes are already referenced in the Master List of Historic Resources. PH5-235—architectural features. Staff supports deletion of"unwilling or". . 10. Please provide a comparison of the penalties and provisions of the Municipal Code, International Property Maintenance Code and the Proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. Property maintenance provisions exist in both the International Property Maintenance Code and the Zoning Code, however, neither are speck to historic properties nor have a focus on their vulnerability to demolition by neglect. Staff recommends a reorganization of the enforcement and property maintenance section to reflect this intent. A comparison of the current versions of the three codes follows: -4- C .. C y z 3 Q Q y ti i Z ti 4i oii i O p obi r C y ZS 6tt 1 d by O � i � i � V tl O O •O � ti '� i y o CL •V � y i� y O O O i 0 01 C r Q 1-n O Tt Q m C Y O Q v oQi .;z .> O -Z Z DI Qa Q ti O� Q U Q Cj.rz Q " ci O of "o o s is Q C y Q Q •O 3 O cl o ru y Sao rzi 0 4 'es 40 R y C O Ll y r ti rz Q t yrl � +� rj C C k O o k p �U .. 0 W 4 W � e. y R 3 � 0 t y Y O .� O ••°�o �. d u r r y ° y y -t ty y9�v C O y ^o t3 z y0 a ?,cam tzZZ d'-g3 rz Y y •�. N � fi O_ ��, � wi 7z rn ° � y �'� 'V � °� m i cYi o ovi °' •� o � � Q t3 �C Y � C "GS N O r d Y y0.4 O d ;Y tQ Y z. C O d C O h y h O ti O O d O U �� r '° y r .� �°y i '° M o ° q > O of y Tt „ 4 O O i v Z ° � O z O � N 'a � o y U 0 y r e � z O ?'N. y � � ti QJ z o °Qn y `o ° Y+ r C O y Q U O y p a .� Q 0 t3 to ee y ty Q" 43 � U � ori oW c,'zt v � oyi •° i � � �o� � � i ° 'Zt ° - v ° .� v e t3cl e m � 3 � v � � � � i � i ss Ct O = cU ° roo y .ti �° m t3 c 'oo � , QCA) _Z' e cu oo o = Y Y ti h -0�- m 'tson rs o=i ai y i 3 'Zs •� � O 65 fi � � .� � � a 'Zs � ct y � q Y 113 L y 0 0 C = a U 3 UW > -0 �1C v -0 yTol o r p C cyj O O C.3 C O yOqa Q6) -0 X10 C cjj ti U O o=i U O Q h h inCi O O OD S 4 r O Oo o Ct h yam{ Q C� i � U o00 obi � a ooi o 14) Ct �t V � O eO = �.° X61 ti C1 C.1 Orz LZ C. y6i U Q O d U O Q d rn h ° O ° h = o p ZS O = Y rs YLI cj zs rz L d 1i ... Q = •� � .., U '> U � � E (ILA) = 11. Why is the proposed range in daily fines so wide? The fines have a large range because the types of violations and the impacts of those violations on historic resources vary widely. There is no magic to the amount of the fines. The CHC desired a strong deterrent for situations that would lead to demolition by neglect. Council could direct staff to come back with administrative guidelines to provide more direction for how the fines would be imposed. For example, a smaller fine might be appropriate for failure to obtain a permit for unpermitted minor work where the work which adversely altered a historic resource can be reversed. The largest fine would be imposed for unpermitted demolition of a historic resource or where demolition by neglect resulted in the building being declared unsafe and a public nuisance. The Council may also determine that an increasing fine is appropriate for second and third occurrences of violations within a certain time period. 12. Please provide some discussion of the fines based on assessed value vs. that proposed in ordinance. The CHC considered different options for fines. The advisory body reviewed examples from other jurisdictions when considering the amount of fines to include in the ordinance. One of the earlier drafts of the ordinance included fines based upon assessed property value, however, after considering input from the public, the CHC agreed with an, observation that basing a fine on assessed value would result in differing penalties depending on how long the property owner had owned the property. The concern expressed was that a violation penalty on a property owned for 10 years would be far less than the same violation on a property that had been owned for two years due to Proposition 13 effects on property valuation. The CHC discussed various options and determined that a specified amount would be the most appropriate option and the action included opting for a similar amount to those reflected in several other jurisdictions with substantial penalties. -8- PHS Red file Response 13. What financial incentives are available for Master List and Contributing Properties? Existing Incentives Master List Properties Contributing Properties Local Mills Act Property tax relief X Federal Tax Credits X Historic Plaque X X Proposed Incentives Master List Properties Contributing Properties Local Mills Act Property tax relief X Federal Tax Credits X Historic Plaque X X Reconstruction after loss X X Modified development X X Standards Additional Uses — B&B, X X Historic use, compatible use Historic & fagade X X easements TDC — transfer development potential X X elsewhere in City where appropriate. Fee waiver or reduction X X Historic Fund assistance X X 14. "Out of Pocket" costs for listed properties going through City process for review? Building and Planning fees are the same for historic and non-historic projects. There are no additional submittal fees required for projects that go through ARC or ARC-MI review — CHC review is part of the process and does not come with an additional charge. CHC action is a recommendation so most decisions are not appealable until subsequent action is taken by Director or ARC. If an appeal is filed, it is subject to the same appeal fees as any other project appeal and this fee is set by City Council. "Out—of—pocket costs"may be related to two situations: If a historic report is required, the applicant is responsible for that cost. Historic reports will be required for proposed modifications to historic buildings where the Community Development Department does not have enough information on file to make a recommendation regarding the -9- l project's consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's standards. In many cases, the historic file specific to the property does have the requisite information and no further reports are required. If a project involves alteration to a historic building where more than 25% of the structure is to be modified, the proposed guidelines define this as a "demolition". If the project cannot be found to be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards, the CHC could find that a substantial adverse affect would be created by the project and an EIR to address that specific impact would be required prior to action being taken. The cost of preparing the focused EIR would be the responsibility of the applicant. 15. Why was 30 days chosen for compliance timeframe? Current enforcement procedures direct the owner to correct a violation within 15 calendar days. The CHC felt that 30 days to correct a violation was an appropriate amount of time. However, public input prompted language to be added to allow the Chief Building Official to grant more time if appropriate (i.e. some structural issues may require engaging an engineer or architect to develop plans which would take more than 30 days). 16. Should the development of the Historic Ordinance have been initiated as a "blank slate" prior to the on-set of staff work? Was the Council mistaken in not conceiving of this effort as similar to adding an element to the General Plan? Council identified creation of the Historic Preservation Ordinance as an "Other Important Objective" through the 2009-2011 Financial Plan. This effort is not similar to adding an element to the General Plan but is instead a General Plan program implementation. The CHC's Whitepaper recommendation from 2000 is incorporated into a General Plan program - Conservation and Open Space Element program 3.6.10 — which specifies that the City shall adopt a Historic Preservation Ordinance. The City has had Historic Preservation Program Guidelines in place for 25 years and provisions in these Guidelines have become the foundation of the proposed Ordinance. Rather than start from a blank slate, the CHC used the.Guidelines as a starting place, reviewed literature and the state of historic preservation practices; discussed and reviewed programs at the State Office of Historic Preservation and National Register of Historic Places; reviewed the application requirements associated with becoming a Certified Local Government (CLQ); reviewed ordinance examples from other CLG jurisdictions; and listened to and incorporated public input and General Plan guidance. While input from a member of the public has indicated that Land Use Element (LUE) 2.15 specifies that this effort should have started with the neighborhoods, the program referenced relates to General Plan direction to develop "Neighborhood Wellness Plans" and does not apply to development of a City-wide ordinance related to historic preservation efforts. 17. What are maximum fines allowed if proposed ordinance penalties are not adopted? What steps are required under Section 1.24 of the Municipal Code? Maximum fines would be $500 per violation. See responses above for Municipal Code process. - 10- 18. ERC should include a member of the Board of Construction Permit Appeals or the CHC member should be eliminated in order to have an odd number of members for decision-making purposes. This body is meant to advise the Chief Building Official and currently the draft ordinance specifies that a majority of a quorum of the ERC is required for all decisions. Staff recommends that additional language be added to clarify this process as advisory to the CBO and that a majority recommendation is not required. The intent of the ERC is to provide additional information for the CBO to consider as post-disaster demolition actions arise. 19.There are some ambiguities in the language that could use clarification. For example, Definition of Neglect and Demolition by Neglect could use some additional language. Staff will take Council direction and make modifications to sections where needed. 20. Is there any circumstance where the Director could overrule a determination of the Council, Planning Commission or ARC? If so, language may need to be added to advertise this decision and to provide for appeal. The Director's authority is not being recommended for expansion. Staff recommends language be added to clarify that the Director's authority does not include such actions as overruling Council. Director determinations are already appealable to Council and there is no need to restate this provision. 21. Consideration of recommended changes to ordinance to include economic infeasibility. Economic infeasibility is addressed in two ways: CEQA review of proposed changes to historic resources, including demolition or relocation, will address feasibility including economic feasibility. The proposed ordinance also includes an economic hardship provision to address economic infeasibilityfor projects and penalties under the enforcement section. - 11 - 4AAQ) roil ct-m,L_ RECEIVED RED FILE ce GM m CDD FIN DIRK SEP 21 2010 MEETING AGENDA �4 FIRE CHIEF ATTORNEY PW DIR DA I to ITEM # fd CLERK/ORIG POLICE CHF SLO CITY CLERK ❑ DEPT HEADS REC DIR f M UTIL DIR Z HR DIR From: Sandi Sigurdson [mailto:slosandiB05@yahoo.com] Sent:Tue 09/21/10 5:46 AM �tw Grr M plCbunlctC� To: Romero, Dave; Ashbaugh, John; Carter, Andrew; Manx, ]an; Settle, Allen �SLo aV�s5 C r1 la Ct,�1C- Subject: historic preservation ordinance Esteemed Council Member, When husband Steve McGrath and I were young and raising our family in downtown SLO we were "those people". The people with the torn-up front yard that stayed so torn up for so long that the pizza delivery guy would say"oh, yeah,the house with the giant pile of dirt in front"when taking our order. • We scrimped and paid for the conversion from fuse box to breakers • We lifted the wood-to-dirt house and poured a foundation • We replaced all of the single pane windows • We finally painted the poor old dear • When the wind blew we collected pieces of roof from our yard and.the neighbor's yard for years. • Most of the house is now insulated • I'd say it took 12-15 years before we really started to do our city proud. • And honestly,there was nothing we could have done differently. We were so fortunate to get a low-interest loan from the city to do the foundation , otherwise the bank would never have given us the home loan inthe first place. Anyway, all this is to say that now I'm pretty worried about at least of a couple of my Buchon St. neighbors who are doing the best they can and frankly some homes are in pretty bad shape. They've lived here for literally two generations. You'd penalize them? Demand improvements they can't afford? This ordinance appears pretty arbitrary and highly punitive and in the end I gotta' ask "really?There is such an inventory of derelict homes in downtown SLO that we need government involvement to rectify the situation?" Sorry that we couldn't be at the meeting tonight. We're out of town. I think we should dial this ordinance language way back and do the bare minimum needed to qualify for the grants we the city are pursuing. Thanks for your consideration, Sandi Sigurdson 665 Buchon St. San Luis Obispo, CA -----Original Message----- From: Paula Carr [mailto:paula_carr@dot.ca.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:42 AM To: Bob Pavlik Cc: Dan Carpenter; Murry, Kim; Dunsmore, Phil; Chippendale, Sue Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines Bob, I echo your sentiments. Historicpreservation has repeatedly been proven to have so many social and economic benefits to a community -- it's both the right thing and the smart thing to do. I will be there this evening. Paula Page 1 of 1 Council,SloCityr From: Betty[bettyslo@charter.net] Sent: Tue 9/21/2010 10:54 AM To: Council,51oCity Cr. Subject ordinance for historic property Attachments: I would like you to vote against this ordinance. Anything that comes before you that has control, penalties, or more restrictions to home owners in it, we do not want. What we want is less government in our lives. You will get just like our national government, push us just too far and we will really rebel. Stop now. Betty Buchanan https://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycounciL/Inbox/ordinance%20for%20historic%20pr... 9/21/2010 •�µt�v (rv"� F�n1L RECEIVED RED FILE Z COUNCIL CDo DIR SEP 21 2010 MEETING AGENDA GAG- FIN DIFI G FIRE CHIEF DATE ? ITEM # � S ATTORNEY PW DIR SLO CITY CLERK h CLERK/ORIG POLICE CHF ❑ D PT HEADS REC DIR ------------------------------------------- Z - PI UTIL DIR From: Bruno Giberti [SMTP.:BGIBERTI@CALPOLY.EDU] Mgk ;Z HR DIR j Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 1:10:45 PM f7 KS W-IIMFs (1h4t- To: Council, S1oCitysw k 406 C M Subject: Historic preservation ordinance Auto forwarded by a Rule �1L I am in full support. The arguments against it seem to be highly irrational and presume that the city and staff cannot treat the issues reasonably. Bruno Giberti AIA PhD Professor Architecture Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning Cal Poly One Grand Avenue San Luis Obispo CA 93407 M5) 756-2036 ------------------------------------------- From: Larry Hoyt[SMTP:LHOYT03@YAHOO.COM] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:31:32 PM To: Council, S1oCity Subject: Tonight's meeting Auto forwarded by a Rule Mayor and Council Members, I will not be able to attend tonight's meeting but want to express my concerns regarding the new ordinance: Before you adopt this ordinance, consider and understand what you are asking of a select group of your citizens. Put yourselves in their shoes. The city has determined that your home is in some sense historical. This determination, which may at first seem like an honor, often results in a substantial taking of property without compensation through building and land restrictions. Now you are being told that you are financially responsible to forever maintain an old structure that long ago probably should have been replaced. You are held responsible for decades of wear that you had no control over. The structure can not be insured and has little value beyond the land it sits on. To make matters worse, you are told that you must do all of this not because your home is really unique or historically important as is called for in preservation guidelines ,but because its age and look increases tourism. Is it really in the city's long term interest to to ignore the Fifth and Twelfth Amendment rights of any of it's citizens. Larry Hoyt RECEIVED SEP 21 2010. SLO CITY CLERK_ From: Ehrbar, Barbara Sent:Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:58 PM To: Judge, Christopher Subject: Phone Call Regarding PH5 Rosemary McKeen Carrington phoned the council asked them to continue consideration of PH5 so that more time can be taken to review the memo from Kim Murry dated September 201n RED FILE - MEPING AGENDA Dq ZN 1 o ITEM y COUNCIL CDD DIR CAO FIN DIR ACAO FIRE CHIEF ATTORNEY PW DIR rX CLERK/ORIG POLICE CHF r ❑ DEPT HEADS FEC DIR / iR UTIL DIR �/ 1RNF HR DIR )21 SLc Cly &YtF�45 P CS Page 1 of 2 Council, SloCity From: Dan Krieger[dan@kriegerconsulting.net] Sent: Tue 9/21/2010 4:35 PM To: Council,SloClty Cc: alexgough@charter.net; 'Dean Miller'; 'Chuck Crotser'; rvessely@callamericacom.net; 'Joseph Carotenuti'; 'Duerr, Sandra-SLO'; slohisWry@gmail.com Subject: Historic Resources Ordinance Attachments: Dear Council Members, I am writing In support of the proposed Historic Resources Ordinance as drafted. I am unable to attend tonight's meeting but I am keenly interested the issues at hand. During the first half of my nearly forty years residence in San Luis Obispo, I witnessed the loss of many important cultural resources through legal demolition processes. Since the creation of the.Cultural Heritage Commission,the loss is largely through benign or deliberate neglect In the.more flagrant instances we have lost significant structures such as the Bottle Works,only to have them replaced by pale imitations of the original structures. I once was able to take groups of children and adults to the bottle works facade on Nipomo Street and speak of all that went on there in this once hot and dry town of the Far West. Today, my audiences don't react in the same way because reality has been supplanted by replica.The original building could have been saved with City intervention in the 1970's and 80's. By the time of the floods of 1995, it was too late. The goal of preservation is to save the best of the historic and contributing structures.This requires an ordinance with some teeth in it,and if necessary In egregious instances,criminal penalties. It also should apply to the city-owned properties,especially the Quintana Adobe on Dana Street, the Garcia Adobe in the Edna/Islay Development and the Bowden/La Loma Adobe off Lizzie Street. Our heritage is the value added portion of our city. Please vote your obligations as stewards of these precious gifts for future generations. Best wishes, https://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/Historic%2OResources%200rdinan... 9/21/2010 Page 2 of 2 DanK Daniel E. Krieger Professor Emeritus,Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo,CA 93407 President, California Mission Studies Association 662 Islay San Luis Obispo,CA 93401-4346 Voice: 805.543.9611 FAX:805.543.7122. dan@kriegerconsulting.net slohistory@gmail.com dkrieger@calpoly.edu https:Hmail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/Historic%2OResources%200rdinaii... 9/21/2010 Page 1 of 1 Council,SloCity From: Andrew Merriam [agmerriam@charter.net] Sent: Tue 9/21/2010 3:25 PM To: Council,SloCity- Cc: Subject: Historic Preservation in San Luis Obispo Attachments: Dear Council Members, As a former practicing architect, planning commissioner,former chairman of the Cultural Heritage Committee and a practicing planner who has prepared over a dozen historic analyses for Caltrans and the County, I would like to express strong support for continued preservation efforts in San Luis Obispo. While there have been times when I felt there was too much micro management In the preservation process,there is no doubt in my mind that our community would have lost much that we feel is vital and wonderful if there had been no preservation effort. Serving on the Conceptual Physical Plan for the Downtown committee with Ken Schwartz, Pierre Rademaker,Chuck Crotser and Rod Levin—a plan which has hung in the City Council chambers for nearly 20 years-convinced me that the commercial vitality of our downtown could not be what it is without major efforts to preserve and build on our authentic historic past While we must permit adaptation and response to modem requirements,allowing significant destruction or degradation of buildings and community character that announce where we have been and who we are in our commercial and residential neighborhoods would be placing San Luis Obispo into a"lowest common denominator"mentality of"anywhere USA". With this approach we could lose what over two centuries of authentic California history on the Central Coast has created: our unique and desirable community. I urge the City Council to judiciously review and update the preservation ordinances but not to abandon a process that has served us well visually,culturally,and economically. Andrew Merriam Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,version of virus signature database 4427(20090915) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. htto://www.eset.com haps://mail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/Historic%20Preservation%20in%20... 9/21/2010 Page l of l Counal,SloCity From: Mary Leizear[mary.leizear@att.net] Sent: Tue 9/21/2010 2:34 PM To: Council, SloCity Cc: Subject: support historic preservation RECEIVED C C C I V E Attachments: fl C C If Peg Pinard is against it,I'm for it. Don't let her beat you down. SEP 21 2010 SLO CITY CLERK RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DATEJ41 to ITEM # ; P COUNCIL CDD DIR jd&AG-Cjl FINDIR- gA-A' ACM FIRE CHIEF ATTORNE`fFwbIR m CLERK/MO Z P- LICE CHP {' � R f9EA�� REG DIR ............' https:Hmail.slocity.org/Exchange/slocitycouncil/Inbox/support%20historic%2Opreservatio... 9/21/2010