HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/17/2009, C3 - WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM FLOW MONITORING SERVICES - REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS council M�in�D.,.
aagenba nepont " o
CITY O F SAN LUIS O B I S P O
FROM: Carrie Mattingly, Utilities Director
Prepared By: Jennifer Metz, Utilities Project Manager
Bud Nance, Wastewater Collection Supervisor
SUBJECT: WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM FLOW MONITORING
SERVICES—REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the request for proposals (RFP) for Wastewater Collection System Flow
Monitoring Services and authorize its issuance, and;
2. Authorize the City Manager to award a two-year contract, if the selected proposal is
within the approved budget of$150,000; $75,000 each fiscal year in 2009-11.
DISCUSSION
Background
Inflow is water that enters the collection system at points of direct connection (non-soil) such as
around manhole covers or through illegal connection of roof drains, downspouts, or landscape
drains. Inflow is usually induced by a rain event.
Infiltration is water that flows through the ground into the collection system usually through
cracks in public sewer mains and/or private sewer laterals. Cracks in sewer pipes may be caused
by age-related deterioration, loose joints, poor design, installation or maintenance errors,
damage, or root infiltration. Water can enter these cracks wherever sewer lines lie beneath
ground water tables or the soil above the sewer system becomes saturated.
The City's wastewater collection system and the Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) have long
experienced problems associated with excessive wet weather infiltration and inflow (I & I). I & I
overloads the collection system during heavy rains and can result in sewage spills. In the past,
the City minimized spills by installing relief sewers. However, relief sewers only serve to convey
the problem to the WRF. During periods of significant rain events, the WRF can become
hydraulically overwhelmed, increasing the chance of effluent violations and the release of
partially treated wastewater to San Luis Obispo Creek.
Because all water entering the WRF must be treated as wastewater, I & I has a significant impact
on operating expenses and drives the need for capital expenditures.
Actions Taken
With Council's support over the past 20 years, the City has made significant progress in reducing
sanitary. sewer overflows and service interruptions. Ongoing comprehensive maintenance
activities and capital improvement projects continue to improve the function of the wastewater
C3 - I
Council Agenda Report-RFP for Flow Monitoring Services
Page 2
collection system. While the public sewer mains are routinely maintained, private sewer laterals
that serve residences and businesses usually go much longer without inspection or repair.
In 1989, Council directed staff to work toward elimination of I & I rather than designing and
constructing additional relief sewers. In 1994, City staff completed a comprehensive
investigation on a portion of the collection system in the northwest part of the City. This
investigation showed that private sewer laterals were the most significant source of I & I. There
are 138 miles of public sewer mains and an estimated 100 miles of private sewer laterals in the
City. Many of these laterals are over 50 years old (50 years is an engineering standard for the
useful life of a typical sewer pipe).
In 1996, Council approved the Voluntary Service Lateral Investigation and Rehabilitation
Program. To date, the program has dispensed around 1,000 reimbursements for lateral repair or
replacement due to troublesome "orangeburg" pipe, structural deficiencies, and root intrusion.
The homeowner benefits by receiving from the city free of charge: free construction permits, free
technical advice and a rebate of one-half the cost of replacement or repair up to a maximum of
$1,000 per property. This action benefits the City by reducing I & I from those laterals.
Continued evidence of significant I & I indicates that this work alone has not been effective.
Detailed studies to identify sources of I & I within the aging infrastructure have not been
conducted since 1994. The proposed flow monitoring is an important next step in the long-term
resolution of the I & I issue.
Current Study
The City is seeking proposals from firms to conduct wastewater collection system flow
monitoring to quantify and analyze wastewater flows in the City's 18 flow basins. See
Attachment 1 for a map of existing flow basins and potential monitoring locations.
The proposed analysis will determine the areas in the City experiencing the highest levels of
inflow and infiltration and will assist the City in focusing its resources. The approved budget for
the two-year study is $150,000; $75,000 each fiscal year in 2009-11.
The RFP for professional services includes both dry- and wet-weather flow monitoring of each
of the City's flow basins in order to differentiate flows during a rain event from normal dry
season flows. The study will also quantify whether excess flows are inflow, instantaneous flow
peaking usually associated with direct connections to the collection system, or infiltration, a
prolonged elevation of flows related to high groundwater levels leaking into the collection
system.
The City is seeking comprehensive flow monitoring services (installation, testing, calibrating,
monitoring, downloading data, and data analysis). Based on the findings of the analysis, the
consultant will quantify the excess I & I entering each of the flow basins, rank basins by the
severity of I & I entering each basin, and break them into sub-basins. Similar data analysis will
follow sub=basin flow monitoring where the consultant will quantify the excess I & I entering
each of sub-basin and rank sub-basins by the severity of I & I.
0 3 -a
f;
Council Agenda Report- RFP for Flow Monitoring Services
Page 3
The consultant will prepare a report summarizing the flow monitoring effort and the data
collected. The report will also include the consultant's recommendations for future programs to
reduce I & I citywide or specific programs to address a more localized I & I problem. After
completion, staff will return to Council with the findings of the study and recommendations for
future programs to reduce I& I.
Evaluation and Selection Process
Proposals are due no later than December 10, 2009. Based on the evaluation criteria set forth in
the RFP, proposals will be reviewed and, if necessary, finalists will be invited for a follow-up
presentation/interview before a review committee. The review committee will be composed of
staff from the City's Utilities department. Reference checks will be conducted.
Based on the results of the selection process, a recommendation will be made to the City
Manager to award the contract. It is anticipated contract award will be made during January
2010.
Prospective Proposers
In addition to publishing a formal notice requesting proposals, the RFP will be mailed to firms
specializing in these services. A list of prospective firms is part of the RFP.
FISCAL IMPACT
This project is estimated to cost $150,000 over a two year period. An Infiltration/Inflow
Reduction Study, including flow monitoring and development of measurable projects to reduce
infiltration and inflow, was approved as part of the 2009-2011 Financial Plan, Significant
Operating program Changes, Appendix A, pages 51-53. A total of $150,000 is budgeted;
$75,000 in each fiscal year.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Provide direction to staff to amend the RFP for Wastewater Collection System Flow
Monitoring Services and approve the RFP based on those changes. Staff has identified a
scope of work focused on gathering data to address the inflow and infiltration issue. This
alternative is not recommended.
2. Deny the issuance of the RFP for Wastewater Collection System Flow Monitoring Services.
This alternative is certainly feasible, although this study is an important next step in the
reduction of inflow and infiltration. This alternative is not recommended.
ATTACHMENT
Wastewater Collection System Flow Basins & Monitoring Locations
ON FILE IN THE COUNCIL OFFICE
Request for Proposals for Flow Monitoring Services
. 013 -3
Attachment
E F G H 3 K L M N 0 P
3
� I
CILy o �
san 6s onispo 5
Y
I �
s I
6 � a
9 � 9
is
� 10
'- \ ti4_
1 u1 Ai v' r L'
_r ~ /
13 L'r 3
g
14 'C \ �•jJ 14
15 I is
3
-_--- -- ----_—_ --_�- —_ _- -
16 16
11r
1 d
n n
\H ^
8 is
I
e i
I
Y'�T b � -X I j YOCNtBNtY t10LO J
® � I Coulif utaeOtf
i9 `�" b n • 19
arvuwm I i I
20 SLOG S -- - - — ---- - - - --- —
E F G H 1 1 K L M N O IP
Wastewater Collection System Flow Basins & Monitoring Locations
18 Flow Basins (Differentiated by color) O Potential Flow Monitoring
Locations (with Manhole ID)
Source:City of San Luis Obispo Utilities Department.,Wastewater Collections,2009.
C3-q