The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/17/2009, PH4 - FINAL DESIGN REVIEW OF THE REVISED CHINATOWN MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE C-D-H ZONE (ARC 3 t council j acEnba nEpont �n C I TY OF SAN LU IS O B I S P O FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director; By: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner SUBJECT: FINAL DESIGN REVIEW OF THE REVISED CHINATOWN MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE C-D-H ZONE (ARC 30-09; 861 PALM STREET AND ADJACENT PARCELS) RECOMMENDATION As recommended by the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) and Architectural Review Commission (ARC), adopt a resolution granting final approval of the revised project design, based on findings, including a finding acknowledging the review and acceptance of the Addendum to the Final EIR, and subject to conditions and mitigation measures. REPORT IN BRIEF SLO Chinatown, LLC, has submitted plans for the mixed-use development project known as the "Chinatown Project". The proposed project site is located within the City's downtown core and consists of eight parcels generally bordered by Chorro, Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets, and occupies approximately 75 percent of this city block. Early on in the process, the City determined that the large-scale, mixed-use project located in a sensitive downtown location had the potential for significant environmental impacts and warranted preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). On December 18, 2007, the City Council certified the Final EIR and Update for the Chinatown Project through City Council Resolution No. 9946. With its consideration of the Final EIR and Update, the City Council requested that they formally act on the final design of the project (Attachment 2 — 12-18-07 City Council minutes). The current version of the project plans is different from the one evaluated in the EIR and includes changes to architectural styles of buildings, pedestrian circulation, on-site parking, and locations and sizes of proposed uses. An Addendum to the Final EIR and Update was prepared to update the project description, impact analysis, and mitigation measures based on the revised project design since the EIR was certified. The Addendum needs to be reviewed and considered along with the Council's review of the final design, but does not require recirculation or a new public review period because the revised project does not result in any new significant impacts not previously analyzed in the certified Final EIR with Update. The revised project plans have been through a rigorous review with a total of four public hearings before the CHC and ARC in 2009. Conceptual hearings were held before the CHC in March and ARC in April to introduce the advisory bodies to the revised design and pinpoint remaining issues that needed fine-tuning before final design review. The two main issues considered by both the CHC and ARC were the architectural styles and detailing of the remodeled Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings at the comer of MontereyandChorro Council Agenda Report—Chins..uwn Project(ARC 30-09) Page 2 Streets and the contemporary style of the hotel building in its Chinatown historical district setting. With each of these conceptual reviews, directional items were identified for the applicant to respond to prior to the final review of plans. With the final review of the revised plans by the CHC on September 28, 2009, and the ARC on October 19, 2009; both groups acknowledged how much the project had improved since its initial submittal and were pleased with the revisions made to address their directional items. The environmental and design review processes have been a success with the Chinatown Project. The revised project plans now before the Council responded to the criticisms received from decision-makers, staff and the public during the many project pubic hearings and the end result is a superior project that respects its setting within two historical districts, is in scale with its surroundings, provides for pedestrian flow through the site and onto adjacent streets, and will bring new excitement and economic vitality to the downtown core. DISCUSSION A. Project Specifics 1. Data Summary Project Addresses: 955 Monro Street; 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870 & 886 Monterey Street; 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street; 984 & 986 Chorro Street Applicant: SLO Chinatown, LLC Representative: Mark Rawson Zoning: Downtown Commercial with the Historical Preservation overlay zone(C-D-H) General Plan Designation: General Retail Environmental Status: A Final EIR and Update was certified by the City Council on December 18, 2007. Mitigated �� , "' el wow Negative Declaration (MND) of •+ - environmental impact was approved by the Ci Council on July 18, 2007. An *' ''• a City Addendum has been prepared to update ' the certified EIR. V WA .� jai 2. Site Description The 2.12-acre project site is located on J. ,. the south side of Palm Street, between Morro and Chorro Streets, and continues 4 down to Monterey Street. It lies within - both the Chinatown and Downtown ► ' '' Historic Districts. The majority of the project site is currently developed with a mix of public and private parking, but *. _ also includes six one to three-story AL buildings. v Council Agenda Report—Chinatown Project(ARC 30-09) Page 3 3. Project Description The proposed project would include the development of the 2.12-acre site to accommodate a downtown mixed-use center of 226,146 square feet (sf), including retail (49,925 sf), offices (5,630 so, restaurants (6,000 so, 16 residential condominium units (19,161 sf), and a 78-room hotel (85,430 sf), in buildings ranging between one to three stories, and with one level of underground parking (30,000 sf/ 74 spaces). A pedestrian plaza is located in the center of the project, which provides entry level access to hotel, retail, and office uses, and is connected by pedestrian walks to Morro, Palm and Monterey Streets. A U-shaped driveway is located off of Palm Street in front of the hotel's main entry to allow for guest loading and unloading activities. The proposed project would consolidate private and public parcels and lead to removal of both private and public structures and surface parking. In order to accommodate the proposed project, three existing buildings would be demolished: 1. 861-863 Palm—Shanghai Low 2. 886 Monterey—Bello's .3. 955 Morro—City offices The Muzio's building would remain and be seismically retrofitted. Much of the interior walls of the Sauer Bakery Building at 848 Monterey Street, and those of the Blackstone Hotel would be demolished, but portions of the exterior walls and architectural elements would be retained, consistent with approved mitigation measures contained in the EIR. B. CHC Meeting Update On September 28, 2009, the Committee voted unanimously to determine that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council, based on findings, and subject to conditions. CHC discussion touched on a variety of topics as noted in the minutes including building details of the Monterey Street structures, site planning, archaeology, and the Sauer bakery oven, which is further highlighted in the evaluation section below(Attachment 3 —9-28-09 CHC meeting follow-up letter& draft minutes). Elizabeth Tyne and Vangeli Evangelopoulos, both of Save Our Downtown, spoke in favor of the revised version of the project. Bob Vessely also mentioned that the revised project was an improvement, but continued to have concerns with how changes to the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery were characterized in the Addendum and CHC agenda report. He provided a letter at the meeting outlining his specific concerns. This letter and a response to his comments on the . Addendum prepared by the City's environmental consultant Amec are attached (Attachment 4). C. ARC Meeting Update On October 19, 2009, the ARC on a 6:0 vote (Commissioner Weber recused) recommended that the City Council approve the final design of the project, based on findings, and subject to conditions (Attachment 5 — 10-19-09 ARC follow-up letter & meeting minutes). The Commission was pleased with the changes made to the project that addressed the directional items the commissioners provided when they reviewed the project conceptually on April 20, 2009. The consensus was that the design had greatly evolved and improved with each version of the project and did a good job at responding to both Commission and public comments. No members of the public spoke during the public hearing. Council Agenda Report—Chinaxwwn Project(ARC 30-09) — Page 4 The focus of discussion was on the hotel design. Some Commissioners had concerns that the Morro Street elevation was not as well articulated as other elevations. The ARC added a condition requesting that changes be made to this elevation to include architectural elements similar to those used on the linear park elevation of the hotel. The Commission made a separate motion to continue action to a date certain,November 2, 2009, regarding the colors and materials for the project. The Commission requested that they see actual paint and material samples for all proposed buildings. On November 2, 2009, the ARC reviewed the actual color and materials samples for all buildings and supported the proposed palettes as submitted (Attachment 5). D. Evaluation Attached to this report is a copy of the October 19, 2009 ARC agenda report prepared for the Commission's discussion of the final review of the revised project design (Attachment 6). This report includes the following important background information that will be of assistance to the Council in evaluating the project design: a. Detailed discussion about the applicant's proposals for structurally reinforcing, seismically strengthening, and remodeling both the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings; b. An analysis of the changes made between conceptual and final ARC review to modify the contemporary architectural style of the hotel to better comply with the Community Design Guidelines for the downtown and complement its Chinatown Historical District setting. Issues Previously Identified by the Council The following section of the report provides an update to some of the design issues identified by the City Council with its review of the EIR in December 2007. The Council suggested that these issues be analyzed with final design review of the project together with other topics of interest affected by the revised project design. 1. Detailed Solid Waste Management Plan The applicant submitted a solid waste management plan (Attachment 7) which has been reviewed by both City Utilities staff and Tom Martin of San Luis Garbage. The plan describes the main centralized location for storage of trash and recycling which is located at the lowest level of the project and accessed via the drive alley off of Morro Street. The plan indicates that trash pick-up would occur in the early morning hours and would be overseen by on-site project maintenance staff. The applicant has used this strategy successfully in the Court Street Project. Secondary storage locations are included in all project buildings and a phasing strategy is discussed to assure that adequate facilities are provided for solid waste before complete project build-out. Both the City and Garbage Company support the applicant's plan conceptually. Condition No. 30 calls for a final detailed plan to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. I Council Agenda Report Chin...own Project(ARC 30-09) - Page 5 2. Reduced Impacts to Adjacent Feliciano Building The new Building "C" where the Bello's building is currently located will be set back from the adjacent Feliciano Building at the comer of Monterey and Morro Streets to address previous concerns with.the loss of access to second-story windows along the shared property line. With the latest round of project reviews; this issue was no longer raised as a concern. 3. Sauer Bakery Oven The current version of plans indicates that the historic bakery oven will be retained in place within the interior of the building, rather than being dismantled and reconstructed in the plaza area as called for in earlier plans. With their review of historical reports for the Sauer Bakery and Blackstone Hotel building on November 18, 2008, the Council required that the "oven be preserved in place to preserve its historic material and shall be fully accessible to the viewing public." As modified by the CHC on September 26, 2009, Condition No. 2 reinforces the requirement for the public to have access to the oven. 4. Housing As is evident when viewing the physical model for the project in relationship to nearby buildings, the current design fits in well in the context of the site and its surroundings. The original submittal of project plans included buildings up to 75 feet in height. In September of 2007, the applicant modified their submittal to show a reduced scale project with all proposed buildings below 50 feet in height. This was the version of plans analyzed in the certified Final EIR & Update. The current version of plans further modified the scale of some proposed buildings and eliminated one level of the parking garage.. One of the consequences of these changes to the project was that the proposed number of residential units within the project was also reduced from 32 to 16 units. The analysis on the Addendum concludes that the modified project does not result in a significant change in the overall job/housing ratio for San Luis Obispo. The project is consistent with General Plan policies that call for new large projects in the downtown to include a housing component, but do not identify an expected quantity of units per development. Two deed- restricted units available for moderate-income households satisfy the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requirement. 5. Parking Current project plans include a subterranean parking garage containing 74 parking spaces. The garage would satisfy the parking requirements for the hotel and residential units, but would not be available for on-site retail, restaurant and office uses. Residents would have assigned parking spaces. Parking for hotel guests would be handled through a valet service. As detailed in Table 3.2-3 of the Addendum, the total project parking demand is 107 spaces. Therefore; with the 74 on-site garage spaces, the project results in a deficit of 33 spaces. In addition, development of the site results in the loss of 155 on-site public and private parking spaces. Therefore, the net unmet parking demand for which parking in-lieu fees would need to be paid is 188 spaces. Council Agenda Report—Chim._ wn Project(ARC 30-09) Page 6 CONCURRENCES The comments from other City departments have been incorporated as conditions in the attached draft resolution. Some minor refinements to conditions to clarify Transportation requirements were made following ARC review of the final design. FISCAL IMPACT When the General Plan was prepared,. it was accompanied by a fiscal impact analysis, which found that overall the General Plan was fiscally balanced. Because the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, it is compatible with this finding. However, the Council also requested a more targeted fiscal impact analysis of the proposed project, which was considered by the Council during its review of the modification of the Chinatown Option Agreement in mid 2008. ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, based on findings of inconsistency with the General Plan and the Margarita Area Specific Plan. 2. Continue the project with direction to the staff and applicant if the Council desires further information or analysis to render a decision. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Vicinity Map Attachment 2: 12-18-07 City Council Minutes Attachment 3: 9-28-09 Cultural Heritage Committee follow-up letter& draft minutes Attachment 4: 9-28-09 Vessely letter with Amec responses Attachment 5: 10-19-09 ARC follow=up letter&minutes & 11-2-09 draft ARC minutes Attachment 6: 10-19-09 ARC staff report& attachments Attachment 7: Applicant's solid waste management plan Attachment S: Draft resolution to approve project design .Distributed to Council: Copies of the Addendum to the EIR and 11" x 1T'project plans G:\CD-PLAN\PRICCI\Chinatown\Staff Reports\Chinatown Project(final design review 11-17-09).doc l t ' �J � O 11 ,- Attachment 1 O pF_HSPF \ ti l , ` ) i ,' PF,H` � C-D- C-D-H - _H_p`; \ I ' C-D-S=H H t� P F-H C-D ,' C-D iy VICINITY MAP File No. 30=09 N 955 Morro; 847,861 ,863, and 877 Palm; 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, and 886 Monterey; 984 and 986 Chorro City Council Meeting Tuesday, December.18, 2007 Aftadment 2 Council Member Mulholland reported on her attendance at the County Water Resources Advisory Committee meeting on December 5th ' Mayor Romero reported on the activities of the County Regional Transit Authority. COMMUNICATIONS Council Member Mulholland referred to a memorandum (on file in the City Clerk's office)from Deputy Director of Community Development Murry regarding an opportunity for a greenhouse gas inventory to be done for the City of San Luis Obispo. To have access to the resources for the doing the inventory, the City may want to consider joining the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). The ICLEI would provide access to a computer model that would assist in generating the inventory, but would require Council to commit to its five-step process involving five milestones. Council Member.Mulholland asked Council to consider placing this matter on a future Agenda for discussion and possible endorsement of this program. Council directed staff to place this matter on the January 8, 2008, agenda. In response to Council Member Mulholland, CAO Hamnian explained that amendment to the Mitchell Park Master Plan has been before the Parks& Recreation Commission, but before it can come to Council, it will need to undergo an environmental review process. It will also need to be heard by the Cultural ' Heritage Commission and Architectural Review Commission, following which it will be brought to Council at a public hearing. This will occur before Council considers the plans and specifications or approves the bid for the parking facility itself. - --------- -_-.----_.___----- PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. REVIEW AND DISCUSS FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW (EIR) CERTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED REVISED CHINATOWN MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, BORDERED BY CHORRO PALM, MORRO, AND MONTEREY STREETS IN THE C-D-H ZONE IN LIGHT OF THE CULTURAL.HERITAGE COMMITTEE (CHC)AND PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) RECOMMENDATIONS (ER 69-05. 861 PALM STREET AND ADJACENT PARCELS) (MANDEVILLEIRICCI - 3 HOURS) _Planning Director Mandeville introduced this item, following which Senior Planner Ricci presented highlights of the revised project, review process and main project issues discussed in the agenda report. City Attorney Jonathan Lowell explained that the applicant's special counsel questioned whether it is appropriate for the City to consider 144 spaces of unmet , parking demand as an environmental impact to be mitigated. He further Ci Council Meeting -� - Attacoent 2 age City 9 Tuesday, December 18, 2007 explained that the applicants special counsel pointed out several cases suggesting it would be improper to impose mitigation measures based on this unmet parking need. City Attorney Lowell said that, in reviewing these cases, they all involved very different fact situations than the one we have here in San Luis Obispo. None of the cases addressed.the loss of existing public parking spaces on public property. Those cases stemmed from challenges by project proponents asserting inadequate environmental review and mitigations to address parking impacts. City Attorney Lowell concluded that the cases make clear the courts give great deference to cities in making environmental review determinations. In addition, in none of those cases is a city precluded from considering environmental impacts related to the loss of parking. Therefore, the Council has the legal ability to consider the loss of parking as an environmental impact and to impose mitigation measures. Dan Gira. Project Manager from Amec Earth & Environmental, reviewed the environmental documents, including modifications made to.the project impacts and mitigation measures as a result of the revised project, significant and unavoidable impacts, and findings of overriding considerations. Consultant Allan Kotin and Finance Director Statler provided an overview of the fiscal impact analysis. Mr. Kotin reviewed a correction to the cost calculations associated with "residential equivalencies" (revised fiscal impact on file in the City Clerk's office). Senior Planner Ricci concluded the staff and consultant presentations with a review of the CAO recommendation, following which staff responded to questions. Mark Rawson, developer, explained why it is important the Final EIR be certified at this meeting. He reviewed the history of this project and its responsiveness to public input. He commented as indicated on the following issues: 1) Demolition of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Buildings. These buildings are not good candidates for adaptive reuse, but the applicant plans to rebuild them to look like 1930s versions of the two buildings. 2) Unmet Parking Demand. This should not be included in the EIR. Doing so may preclude finding a solution that is not available at this meeting. Additionally, absorbing the 144 spaces would not be difficult given that the number of unused spaces available in City garages. 3) Affordable Units. The Muzio building will be seismically retrofitted for safety purposes. The former six residential units on the upper floor were substandard units and were not deed restricted to assure affordability. The applicant plans to include four deed-restricted affordable units on the third _ -� _� Ame t Ch �1t City Council Meeting Tuesday, December 18, 2007 floor of the proposed Building C. In addition, there will be more units in other buildings that are considered affordable by design than previously existed. 4) Sauer Bakery Oven. Space has been allocated in the plaza area to reconstruct and display the historic oven doors. 5) Hotel Parking. This would be adequate as the hotel would cater to customers arriving in groups but staying in separate rooms. Mr. Rawson responded to Council's questions. Council recessed from 9:28 until 9:40 p.m. and the meeting reconvened with all members present. In response to Council Member Settle, Consultant Allan Kotin explained that certification of the EIR plays a major role in obtaining tenants for the development by maintaining credibility that the project is successfully proceeding onward even if all other needed project entitlements have not been secured. Mayor Romero opened the public hearing. Susan Ellenbogen. San Luis Obispo, suggested that two more deed restricted, affordable units should be required in the project, that the Sauer and.Blackstone buildings should be preserved and rehabilitated, and that there are days when the ' City's new parking structure is full. Alex Gough; San Luis Obispo, displayed photographs of and asked that the Swiss-Italian building be preserved and restored and asked that as much of the Blackstone building as possible be saved. Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, discussed mitigations for historic resources and spoke in support of staffs alternative#3 . He asked that mitigation measure CR- s be revised to incorporate architectural details of the original Swiss-Italian building and any potential remaining elements of the Quintana Block Building in the new construction. He also asked that an additional requirement be added to CR-5 that requires the architect to endeavor to incorporate the Ah Louis bricks into the new construction of the new hotel. He opposed demolition and supported preservation, restoration or adaptive reuse of the Master List Sauer Bakery building, and encouraged the Council to require the detailed rehabilitation feasibility analysis that the Cultural Heritage Commission had recommended. Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, explained that the applicant did not provide enough information for the Cultural Heritage Commission to make a decision for the demolition of the historic structures. He asked that, if Council certifies the EIR, a requirement be added to save the Sauer Bakery Building on the Master List of Historic Properties, that the bricks from the Blackstone building be -) AtWtment 2 City Council Meeting g Tuesday, December 18, 2007 recycled, and that the facade of the Swiss-Italian building facing Chorro be ' adaptively reused in the project. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, suggested that pedestrian circulation for its own sake is not the most efficient land usage,and that pedestrian paths must adquately feed the retailers. He also suggested that historical buildings should not only be seen as isolated structures, but for the role they play in the organization of a historical district. He further said that adaptive reuse of historic buildlings is an important approach in today's economic and social environment. Don Rivara, San Luis Obispo, discussed the history of the Quintana Building (Blackstone Hotel) and spoke in opposition to its demolition.. (Mr. Rivara's concerns are further expressed in a red file document available in the City Clerk's office.) Gary Fowler, San Luis Obispo, asked for additional information regarding height limitations or restrictions for all buildings in the project. He was concerned that project parking impacts were mitigated by in-lieu fees rather than on-site parking spaces. Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, concurred with prior speakers and spoke in support of the preservation of the Sauer Bakery building and ovens and the ' recycling of the Blackstone building bricks.. Thomas Quintana said he is a direct descendant of Francisco Estavan Quintana. His main concern related to cultural resource mitigation measures and he suggested that the culture and history of the people who had lived here should be included, in the project. Susan Devine, San Luis Obispo, urged Council to adopt staff s alternative #3 and said that there must be an analysis of the Sauer Bakery building for the purpose of its rehabilitation and adaptive reuse. Christopher Yip, San Luis Obispo, discussed his qualifications as an architect and said that at least the facades of the contributing historic buildings should be preserved. He suggested that further investigation must be done to develop a way to express the Chinese-American past. Bruno Giberti, San Luis Obispo, discussed his background as an architect and former member of the Cultural Heritage Commission. He suggested that without a structural report, the applicant has not demonstrated that the buildings cannot be rehabilitated. He urged Council to support the Cultural Heritage Commission's decision to require a detailed rehabilitation feasibility analysis and opposed the demolition of the buildings. Pfl� ` � � Attachment 2 City Council Meeting — Page 10 Tuesday, December 18, 2007 Joseph Abrahams. San Luis Obispo, suggested the project lacks imagination, that there should be access to an inner courtyard where families can circulate, that there should be more community involvement in the design of the project, and that there should be an organic connection between Chinatown and the Mission Plaza. Dan Krieger, San Luis Obispo, discussed his expertise as a historian and his role as a founding member on the Cultural Heritage Commission. He expressed concern about the loss of the Quintana (Blackstone) and Sauer Bakery buildings and said that the buildings on the Master List of. Historic Resources, such as the Sauer Bakery, must be preserved. Nick Watrv. San Luis Obispo, encouraged Council to certify the EIR. Deborah Cash, Downtown Association, said that the Board.has supported the project since its inception and that she felt confident the Board members would support moving forward with the EIR. She urged Council to certify the EIR. Chuck Crotser, spoke on behalf of the Cultural Heritage Commission and explained why the Commissioners had recommended that a detailed rehabilitation feasibility study to analyze the potential adaptive reuse in the project of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings be completed prior to any final actions regarding their demolition. Devin Gallagher, New Zealand,agreed with'comments in support of the preservation of the historic buildings. Chris Bleuher, San Luis Obispo, supported project changes made by the applicant and asked Council to certify the EIR. Boz Schrage, San Luis Obispo, expressed conern about changing the ambiance of the City and asked Council to support the Planning Commission and Cultural Heritage Commission, and preserve the history.of the City by preserving the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Michael Helper, San Luis Obispo, questioned whether the proper posting had been done for this hearing and suggested that the Blackstone building can be retrofitted and preserved in the project, Ermina Karim, representing the Chamber of Commerce, said while the Chamber applauds the City's process, it hopes the City will continue to balance historic preservation with economic vitality. Pete Evans, San Luis Obispo, suggested that tourists are drawn to the City because of its quaintness and historical buildings. He said he has had difficulty ' finding spaces in the parking garages. attachment City Council Meeting Page 11 Tuesday, December 18, 2007 ' Danielle Castle, San Luis, also commented on the quaintness of the downtown and opposed the demolition of historic buildings. Bob Lucas, San Luis Obispo, acknowledged the project modifications but spoke in supoprt of preserving the historic buildings. Mayor Romero closed the public hearing. Council Member Carter spoke in opposition to certifying the EIR at this meeting, particularly since the Planning Commission and Cultural Heritage Commission did not receive the structural analysis or financial feasibility report requested regarding the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. He was also concerned that the City's parking fund was structurally imbalanced. Vice Mayor Mulholland also spoke in opposition to certifying the EIR at this meeting. She was concerned that the public did not have an opportunity to review the resolution or statement of overriding considerations that were released today, as well as possible notification or posting issues. In addition, she said she did not think the Statement of Overriding Considerations offset the impacts to the community of the current proposal. Council Member Settle supported certification of the EIR given the substantial modifications to the project to lower its height and scale. Council Member Brown also supported certification of the EIR. He explained he is willing to do so because this is not a decision determining whether the project is a good or bad one, but whether the EIR adequately addresses the projects potential environmental impacts and needed mitigations. Mayor Romero also supported certifying the EIR. However, he expressed concern that a structural analysis of the Sauer Bakery building had not been provided. Discussion ensued regarding mitigation measures, parking, affordable housing and design issues. Council directed that the changes contained in the December 18, 2007, Errata Sheet be included in the Final EIR. Further direction was provided as indicated below. Historic Buildings There was consensus to modify the third bullet of Mitigation Measure CR-4 to require a historic structures report for the Sauer Bakery building that will identify features that may be preserved and/or incorporated into the project. Additionally, language requiring review of the plans by the Cultural Heritage Committee will be deleted. f`13 Attachment 2 City Council Meeting Page 12 Tuesday, December 18, 2007 There was also consensus to modify the third bullet of Mitigation Measure CR-5 to include language directing the reuse of the Ah Louis bricks found on the site of the Blackstone Hotel building as deemed feasible by a historic structures report, as well directing that portions of the fagade of the Swiss-Italian building along Chorro Street be reused as deemed feasible by a historic structures report.that identifies features that might be preserved and/or incorporated into the new construction. Council Member Mulholland explained why she preferred that both the Sauer Bakery and Blackstone buidings be considered for rehabilitation and adapative reuse. She thought the buildings could be sensitively deconstructed and redesigned within the existing footprints. She expressed discomfort with the demolition of the Bello's building and the height of the building proposed to replace it. Council Member Carter asked that the Cultural Heritage Commission be involved in developing the scope of work for the historic structures report. However, Commissioner Crotser clamed that the Cultural Heritage Commission consensus was that the report should be prepared and submitted directly to Council. Council Member Settle,Vice Mavor Brown and Mayor Romero said they concurred with staffs recommendation and directed that the historic structures report be prepared by Applied Earthworks, who prepared the EIR. Parking City Attorney Lowell explained that the December 11, 2001, and February 18, 2003, Council agenda reports indicate that the matter of replacement public parking was deferred so as to be dealt with at the same time as the EIR for the Chinatown project. Council Member Carter, Mavor Romero and Vice.Mayor Brown said they supported the recommendation to accept Mitigation Measure TT-7a, included in the Final Update for the EIR, requiring payment of mitigation fees for 144 parking spaces equivalent to the existing in-lieu parking fee in effect at the time of the building permit issuance. Council.Member Mulholland disagreed particularly because the project will generate a number of public uses but does not provide public parking spaces. Affordable Housinq With the concurrence of Vice Mayor Brown, Council Member Settle and Mayor Romero staff was directed to remove Mitigation Measure PH-2 since, with the ' inclusion of four deed-restricted affordable housing units, the project is consistent t K. ►y 4ttaomnt 2 City Council Meeting ge Tuesday, December 18, 2007 with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and this Mitigation Measure is no longer necessary. Council Member Carter disagreed, preferring that six affordable housing units be required: Council Member Mulholland also disagreed, since six rental units are being lost. She also explained why she did not think deed restricted units equate to low- income units. Miscellaneous Council Member Mulholland explained why she did not think energy and air pollution issues have been addressed. In response to Council Member Mulholland, Project Manager Gira discussed the ways in which these have been addressed in the EIR. There was no direction to pursue these issues further. Direction To Architectural Review Commission (ARC) Discussion ensued during which Council requested that the ARC specifically look at the following issues when considering the project design: 1) a detailed solid waste management plan, 2) reduced impacts to the adjacent Feliciano building, and 3) reuse of components of the Sauer Bakery oven as recommended by the historic structures study that will be completed as indicated previously. Council Member Carter said that it will be important.for the ARC to aim high when considering design issues and not to accept mediocrity. Issues with which he was particularly concerned are: • The use of painted stucco. He suggested that there needs to be a variety of materials used and that painted stucco is not a sufficient exterior finish. • The need for steps. He thought that 32 steps are too many to get from one - level to another and that escalators should be considered. • There needs to be a link from the hotel lobby to the restaurant. • The second-story publicbalcony above the Monterey Street entrance to the garage doesn't seem feasible due to concerns about automobile exhaust and noise. • The paseo entrance on Morro Street is adjacent to garbage access and a delivery area and this raises concerns. Council Member Mulholland concurred with Council Member Carter's comments. A� Attpchment City Council Meeting -- Page 1 Tuesday, December 18, 2007 Vice Mayor Brown, Council Member Settle and Mayor Romero felt that the ARC and applicant should have the flexibility to work out the details of these design ' concerns. Mayor Romero indicated that he hoped the applicant would consider designing underground parking with a directional flow. During the Council discussion, there was consensus that the ARC should consider the compatiblity of the project with nearby historic buildings and the Downtown historic district. In addition, Mayor Romero reoommmended that consideration should be given to directional signage for the parking area. ACTION: Moved by Settle/Carterto: 1. Adopt, with amendments, Resolution No. 9946 (2007 Series) making findings, adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report and Update for the Chinatown Project. 2. Provide direction to the Architectural Review Commission related to the design issues as indicated above; carried 4:1 (Mulholland opposed). There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Romero adjourned the meeting at 12:25 a.m. Audrey H*er City Clerk APPROVED BY COUNCIL: 01/22/08 1 k ttachment ►��H��o►IIII�III@��""""�� (III - at of san luis o ISPO Community Development Department•919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 October 21, 2009 SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 12260 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 SUBJECT: ARC 30-09: 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844,' 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 . Chorro Street Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project Gentlemen: The Cultural Heritage Committee, at its meeting 'of September 28, 2009, determined that the revised project design is appropriatein the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council, based on findings, and subject to conditions: Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourages projects to be pedestrian-oriented and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures. 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian-oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper-floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007, with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently-completed Addendum. rt The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. r ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed-Use Project) Attachment 3 CHC Meeting of September 28, 2009 Page 2 Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC and ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. 3. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 4. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades, and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 5. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 6. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources, or cultural materials, then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered, materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are . encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with -the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR mitigation measures. ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed--Ose Project) Attachment 3 CHC,Meeting of September 28, 2009 Page 3 The decision of the CHC is a recommendation to the ARC and City Council and, therefore; is not final. This matter was scheduled for administrative action before the ARC on October 19, 2009. The matter has been tentatively scheduled for administrative action before the City Council on November .17, 2009. . This date, however, should be verified with the project planner. If you have any questions, please contact Pam Ricci at.(805) 781-7168. R'Y,ry Deputy Community Development Director Long-Range Planning cc: County of SLO Assessor's Office Mark Rawson P.O. Box 12260 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 i I DRAFT SAN LUIS OBISPO Attachment 3 CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of September 28,2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice-Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chairperson John Fowler ABSENT: None STAFF: Senior Planners Jeff Hook and Pam Ricci; Kim Murry, Deputy Director, Tyler Corey; Michael McGuire, Civil Engineer, and Janet Miller,Recording Secretary. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no comments from the public. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Recognition of Chairperson John Fowler for his service on the Cultural Heritage Committee. MINUTES: Minutes of August 24, 2009 were approved as amended. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. INFORMATION ITEM: 1. 536 Marsh Street. Historic Jack House fire sprinkler installation project. Michael McGuire, Civil Engineer) Vice-Chair Crotser requested clarification on the riser pipe. Mike McGuire, Civil Engineer, described the location and installation of the pipe and measures being taken to minimize the visibility and architectural impact of the fire sprinkler work.. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the timeline of the design for the project. Mr. McGuire discussed the length of the timeline and need for the installation. Chairperson Fowler asked if there was a protocol for reviewing this project: Mr. Hook, noted that because the Jack House is a public facility and both its interior and exterior are historically and architecturally significant, this project would normally be reviewed by the CHC. The project had Jack House Committee review; however staff felt it was important to bring the project to the CHC as an information item at this point. The Committee thanked Mr. McGuire for his presentation. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 955 Morro Street,840, 842,844, 848,868,870, & 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847,861,863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street. ARC 30-09; Review Draft CHC Minutes September 28,2009 Attachment 3 Page 2 of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, with the recommendation to determine that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission and City Council,based on findings, and subject to conditions which she outlined. Mark Rawson, applicant architect, explained the revised project plans. Chris Harrelson, Brand Allen Architects, spoke in support of the project on the behalf of the hotel proposed on the site. Committee Member Carpenter questioned the use of the porthole windows since they were not a part of the original Quintana building design. Mr. Rawson acknowledged that the windows were not a part of the original building, but felt that they were existing architectural elements that added a balance and symmetry that tie in with the architectural design. Vice-Chair Crotser asked if there would be public access to the historic ovens in the Sauer Bakery building. Mr. Rawson noted that a specific tenant had not yet been secured for the proposed space and that access would need to be worked out with the tenant in the future. He stated that incorporating the ovens was a creative addition to the space and that the applicant wanted flexibility on how a tenant would use the space. Pam Ricci noted that the Council action on accepting the historical reports for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings had required that the ovens should be accessible by the public. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the Sauer Bakery ovens. Mr. Rawson described the state of the ovens and noted that their protection would be carried out during the renovation project. Committee Member Miller requested clarification on the chimney-type features on the new building adjacent to Muzios. Mr. Rawson noted that these would be used to screen venting and other roof-mounted equipment. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Elizabeth Thyne, San Luis Obispo, supported the project. Ms. Thyne noted that the current plans presented at this meeting were a tremendous improvement from previous versions. Ms. Thyne requested clarification on how handicapped access was provided and asked if the model would be available for the public to view. Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, supported the revised project scale and how it complemented downtown. He supported the larger windows on the Chorro elevation of the remodeled Blackstone/Quintana Building, the turf areas in the linear park, and the way that the pedestrian walkways divided the site into two blocks. He suggested that Chinese sculptural elements be used along the main paseo entry points. �?K� -a i Draft CHC Minutes _ September 28,2W9 Attachment 3 Page 3 Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, disagreed with use of the term "adaptive reuse" to describe the proposed changes to the historic Blackstone Hotel because of the extent of demolition proposed. He suggested that the reuse of Ah Louis bricks in the project needs to be a condition. He added that public access to the historic Sauer Bakery ovens was required by the Council and should not be a tenant option as suggested by the applicant. He submitted a detailed letter outlining his comments on the EIR Addendum and CHC staff report. There were no further comments made from the public. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Vice Chair Crotser suggested that changes to the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings should be identified as a reinterpretation,rather than adaptive reuse. Committee Member Carpenter noted that the entries to the linear park provided an excellent opportunity to introduce Chinese features. Committee Member Oliveira mentioned the importance of archeological monitoring at this site and how it would need to include provision for having a Native American monitor on-site during grading and construction activities. He suggested that the project include some type of display for artifacts found on the site as a part of archaeological fieldwork. Ms. Ricci pointed out that the CHC had previously reviewed a draft archaeological fieldwork plan and commented on proposed cultural resources mitigation measures. She noted that the RFP for the EIR had taken into account that archeological services would be required for the project and that the contract for the work could be approved by the City Manager, rather than requiring a new, separate review by the City Council. Committee Member Miller was pleased with the Chorro Street elevation and paseo areas in the project. He supported the improved pedestrian flow along Monterey Street with the elimination of the driveway and a white-on-white color scheme for the Quintana building. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Vice-Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, to determine that the-revised proiect design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical District , and recommend final approval of the proiect design to the ARC and City Council, based on thefmdings included in the staff report, and with the conditions in the staff report with specific amendments to Condition.No. 2 regarding retaining the Ah Louis bricks in place or reusing them in other parts of the proiect and provision of public access to the ovens.of the Sauer Bakery Building. Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown_Historical Districts and.complement ��y �z Draft CHC Minutes - Attachment 3 September 28,2009 - Page 4 the architectural character of the surrounding buildings.and area.consistent with the_City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines.. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourages projects to be pedestrian-oriented and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures. 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the LandUseElement including_providing vedestrian-oriented_ spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007, with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR &.Update and the recently-completed Addendum. Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC and ARC and ultimately approved by the City-Council. A separate, full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building_permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations.. Public access to thehistoric baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit.. 3. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds,recesses, and other related window features. 4. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades, and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 5. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 6. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitotingplan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings.. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor.to be.present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, Draft CHC Minutes ( l September 28,2009104 AttachmentPage 5 A archaeological resources, or cultural materials,then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR.mitigation measures. AYES: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice-Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chairperson John Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. The Committee took a 10 minute break at 7:30 p.m. 2. 863 Pacific Street. ARC 51-09; Review of three new dwelling units on a Master Last Historic property; O zone; SLO investments, INC., applicant. (Tyler Corey) Tyler Corey, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, with the recommendation that the CHC recommend the ARC approve the project, based on findings and subject to conditions which he outlined. Committee Member Oliveira requested information on the historical inventory preparation for the historic property. Mr. Corey replied that the information was prepared by trained volunteers in the early 1980's. Chairperson Fowler requested clarification on the condition regarding demolition. Mr. Corey replied that the project is not proposing to demolish any structures on the site. Committee Member Oliveira requested clarification on the timing and need for historical surveys. Staff replied that surveys are typically required at property listing or with significant property alterations or historic building modifications. Vice-Chair Crotser requested clarification on the location of the addition in relation to the existing buildings. Staff provided clarification on proposed setbacks and connections of the new building to the existing structures. Carol Florence, applicant representative, requested language modifications to conditions 2, 3 and 4 which replaced the wording "match" with "be compatible with". Ms Florence provided a project overview and noted that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards state that new additions should be clearly differentiated from the original historic buildings. Steve Puglisi, applicant representative, discussed the reasons for the proposed roof pitch. Mr. Puglisi noted that he was open to Committee suggestions on the proposed drive isle entry ROBERTS �r�:i Attachment 4 L/ESSELY CIVIL & STRUCTURAL E N G I N E E R I N G 143 Podfic St.,Suite 8 San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 805/541-2003 September 28, 2009 Ms. Pam Ricci, Senior Planner Community Development Department City of San Luis Obispo 919 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 RE' Chinatown Project. Ms. Ricci, Having reviewed the staff report for the Cultural Heritage Committee meeting later today and the EIR Addendum for the Chinatown Project, I have some questions and concerns. First, regarding the EIR Addendum: 1. In some places(Pages 2-1, 2-2,2-3, 2-6&2-9 for example)the treatment of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Building is described as"adaptive reuse"whereas in other places (Pages 2-3&3-2 for example)the buildings are noted to be"reconstructed".This is an obvious discrepancy which should be corrected. 2. On page 2-9, the treatment of these two buildings is described as"adaptively reused for new construction"which is a somewhat confusing phrase. 3. Also on page 2-9,the report states that the revised project includes the"retention of the wall of the historic Blackstone Hotel along Chorro Street" but the plans show that the third story portion of that wall will be removed. 4. In section 2.2.2,the project is described"with the second stories compromising a mix of hotel and residential space" but the second level of Buildings"B"and"C"are shown on the plans to be retail and office uses. 5. On page 3-2, the report states the third stories of the Blackstone and Sauer buildings°w the upper levels further setback off Monterey Street to reduce overall project ith ct size, height, and scale and minimize shading"but the plans show that setback to be only two feet which would be ineffective in achieving those goals. 6. In her Peer Review dated October 22, 2008,Andrea Galvin stated that"These changes to the exterior facede of the Sauer building have gained significance in their own right..." referring to the fagade having been moved back in 1912-1913 and changed to the three window configuration that existed until the mid-1960s. Also, her analysis of the Blackstone "GPA identified the streamline modem fagade as a significant contributing feature of the building". Under the CEQA Guidelines and case law, the agency has no choice but to evaluate the potential impact if a"fair argument"can be made, based on substantial evidence in the record, that the project might result in a potentially significant environmental.. impact Since Ms. Galvin has identified the post-1913 fagade of the Sauer building and the "streamline modem"fagade of the Blackstone as significant and the proposed project would demolish them, they need to be evaluated in the EIR-Addendum. Attachment 4 Ms.Pam Ricci September 28,2009 Page 2 7. In Table 3.2-5, impacts CR-3 and CR-6 are both noted to increase from Class III to Class II impacts under the revised project Since these constitute an increase in the level of significant impacts on the environment, the EIR Addendum should be circulated for public review according CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. 8. On page 3-7, the report notes that the revised project will"adaptively reuse"the Blackstone building and therefore"exceeds the City Council's minimum threshold of retaining the Ah Louis bricks".The implication is that under the revised plan there would be no bricks to be retained and reused but the project plans call for the Monterey Street wall, as well as the northeast and northwest walls of the building are to be removed. These are all brick walls and will produce a significant number of reusable bricks. Regarding the Staff Report: 1. The applicant describes the treatment of the Blackstone and Sauer buildings as an"adaptive reuse"and sites the retention of the Chorro Street wall and"leveling of the floors"as evidence. Adaptive reuse is a component of rehabilitation and rehabilitation is defined in the Secretary of the Interior Standards. That definition includes: "A property will be... given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials,features, spaces and spatial relationships." Since the existing floors of the Blackstone and Sauer buildings are offset vertically by as much as six feet, some areas will have to be taken out in order to"level the floors". Using the best case scenario, that is, keeping the largest area of existing floor and removing only the areas at other elevations, approximately 60%of the eAsting floor and therefore 60%of the building will have to be removed and reconstructed. This hardly constitutes"minimal change to spaces and spatial relationships". I can hear the argument already, "We had to take down most of the building, make new openings in the remaining floor for new vertical access, make new openings in the.Chorro Street wail for new windows, there was nothing left to save"or"We had to remove the rest.since it was in such poor condition"or"We tried to save it but we just couldn't find a way". 2. Among the conditions of approval imposed by the City Council is the requirement that"The (Sauer)oven shall be preserved in place to preserve its historic material and shall be fully accessible to the.viewing-public"(emphasis added). The drawings for the project show the oven buried at the back of a retail space and under a second floor addition.Without major concessions on the part of the store owner, the oven will hardly be"fully accessible". You may have assumed from this letter that 1 am opposed to this project. I am not. I am opposed to describing the project inaccurately, using catch phrases like"adaptive reuse"or"the spirit of the Secretary of the Interior Standards"to pad the justification for the design and to the misuse of the historic resources on this property. Of all the sites in the City there could hardly be one more important to the character of San Luis Obispo than this one. Sincerely, (olrt& PE D:OfrK* Aavdo nCHC3.d= Y ; I Attachment 4 .arz Qp.� O C U •O C C _.. C - C ` •fl U �" •� N OD•p d rz O w b d.OA O N U N W {UJ 'O E O N .00 C C O >,s 3 •00 04 0 y y C U :? N •C O •C d U i O C 'UO N C N cC > OC �. N cN0 R. n' O 'b -C ° •—a �. C 3 C Cn •C eo iC � a) -OE y 'y •d W EL a, N C N C .0 C .� O u a N G•'O E C O O U U �. y �C a . C � °�' y ` ago uw a� L � .. 0N = L 0 w aoi a s L o .U°. s 5 N e Nv h o ff ow � > — a°i � •Es w cti U •> C " i V > � L O E 2 �' ? `c y cs .0 U 0 on 0, > ° 3 0 ago o .. • • • •N = � C -Z 0 � N O > U NN -C 3 V 0 CO` U > 2 G Cl LN UULC .oOU y,°a� CC �r. . •n o sN$ 333U 'nL oL 5 �N =� EN OUu > eN 00 0 G y ° 0"a p N C oC 'yNX � � Vy� ' v >> 'no ° E > � w p U > bC C = N�CN U O yU., U '�• C .-. N E O .+ � W b � :+" C C r tC Ol > U 7 c9 E U 7 A N � Q $ .° •y y o o g 0 3 W � U p ° L t Z ": 0 "a Q ` E 3 N ° N C N m Cf) O C vyi S N ° > O N U N 7 C .E h O T W �+' p C y N C 0 a td C C C C C C d 'O °q U O C GQ N U p ' .fl ° •E 4. :+ C .S+ >O 'L ,S'. d O •C ar ^O s ;,d ,C' :U y •E p •� -U E t�, y t a N '= o °: a°i y s aEi s s y �o1.. ,� ° o 0 o G u o cu 5 R o a .D a s [n . 3 H .. 3 3 W N U C/] al F N 0 a a E < � N 3 N N M R IA �O �.m3m 0ES •g'L '.� 6 Egj m£.fl $$ me o0 ��m ma rc 5c� E c0 9ejgEm °� msv E �w Qm �3E H.m°� i C� � § am tr�n?` � tl1�°co Caa qo 4 40) I ''asgE 32 CM a Cy a�bgTp� aW m 3c $@ owncs 016 Ft p-m�Evom vvv mmoggE yym m fia � �$'0 5 �'m� rr p� � �Etmam:E 31 o EN Qm •5 .co g 'm5 MRsors2s° _11 $ cQ m .. $ �.N,.m'(Eq,rS �c m2. g' ,yOgt� ..�mv�5�8,Q 8= a' ' rt='I io� 3�WE 2�p a g V nm��' I, fix $ q �$ HMO 3m mma�0• l o a•y s m W(L m•S2 of o! m m•2.N m m m iil � g ga t� Q £5 mm�6 r� Nm ry'Mv CZ 3i1 oomgmg /F- �D a _m° a .? �I.�$�° ac 0.2 �`!a`a N m z14g4�£�,�8 = m ck �U j N °j—� 1E crn OQ.ND m° a.d10 O�r � C mL W�O?0 N�.c W �:. m cc 0 .�c. E �.m� O1 om,gc � mam 4 c,��cm '`mo O� :W EcmEm @v g .W �c �is$ ma� cmc LgmgQama��E "= aEE`oa� U C cQ �,c.=a O8 doPi s(a 0� � yS.12.1 *5mmF;°0 W Mo U rn t) K f xm'w u..' ci ri v vi 7 >z :p Attachment 4 o N a >, ° o s g .. ° _ N b w C w C 'b w s d) m Cu "a OCs w N .ter N w C w .°c a `; o �?U 3 m °' y p c op cxi L °: fl r "U7, U U F' '� w •w C ,^ .+ •L.. N y ..+ ° Qui O rj• o e� fl o s 3 $ " o°o 3 U e Eo � o -' Dona auw .. � � 0w0 c ° o osf a� �..� y 3 0 a.yoL � N b o "ZJ j3 w0 E O w y o v .5 = chi u � z '� vi ani R .o . bo 0 -0 "°-o M aai c o a to � 3 •� o .� w ° � � e .� y °c.� eu � .� ub:d .o " o no w •p w ..� •o ° •° �' ca C C w u U w O L X O i E' LJ w t abi 4. H c " E p O w = ° = p ca v cw 0 to 415 ' � agu N y DsCaO G� v L � 9:4 s w �- y s O ,� C on 3 > e E 3 o w b o L •C ,D 7 C O C 'y Ca � r. 0 W 0 � - c ° F > o, a> p14 'en > � x° � =ya � UcO a0ao o O pCN s Z6aU r co' m m v as m E `d� o v Emgggg '2 � g911 = � rD v E' $Ee, m 8 $ wm $ iE r a•g�.W5 1WCOa 00 q p g a. g £ °ic .$ '� �v@ 1c'.°.oi.9191$ m 8; M E�?.Eta q. tl i2 r, °gam s s�g$ S m 8` v.yyE2 io�'bm&�E � .E.' S. Zr cof �p oYra j.S £�aa0 10 ra 80C C ;C3 cx553 £oxy'$ 70�rSy�$, c�" m � mWp -� $ imam L e rjm,C is C EEEm ' I . 0 . 53.:c ° E8coo NvE � r•m av c45m7 co. m �° £m MM z . a aq¢ . m mg > �cx Ha aim �S J o£ o= G n mm mm 5 m �Wd m � fV 09 d7a C }Q fp;c- N ��I81�I�� IIIIIIIpp _ Attachment 5 IIII (IIICftY Of SAn tuf'S' OBISPO Community Development.Department•919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 October 22, 2009 Mark Rawson SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 12260 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 SUBJECT: ARC 30-09: 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project Dear Mr. Rawson: The Architectural Review Commission, at its meeting of October 19, 2009, took two separate actions related to the project. A. The ARC recommended final approval of the project design to the City Council, based on the following findings, and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourage projects to be pedestrian-oriented, and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures. 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian-oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper-floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007, with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently-completed Addendum. �� The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. ARC 30-09(Chinatown Mixed-Use Project) Attachment 5 ARC Meeting of October 19, 2009 Page 2 Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC & ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate, full-size sheet shall be" included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping, or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural' Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitationlrestoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. 3. The Morro Street elevation of the hotel shall be further articulated incorporating architectural elements similar to those used on the linear park elevation of the hotel to the approval of the Community Development Director as part of the submittal of.working drawings. 4. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 5. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades, and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 6. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 7. All City Council-approved mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR with Update and Addendum shall be included as conditions of approval, and are incorporated herein by reference. 8. As called for in Mitigation Measure TT-7a, the applicant shall pay parking in-lieu fees for a total of 188 parking spaces prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Permits for the seismic retrofit and remodeling of the Muzio's, Sauer Bakery, and Blackstone Hotel buildings may be issued prior to the payment of in- lieu fees. ��LLo ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed-Use Project) Attachment 5 ARC Meeting of October 19, 2009 Page 3 9. Consistent with Mitigation Measure TT-4, the building plan submittal shall include a summary of and show all the required and proposed short-term and long-term bicycle parking per M.C. Section 17.16, Table 6.5, and in accordance with standards contained in the 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan update and Community Design Guidelines. Plans shall include the dimensions for, locations of, and details and detail references on the plans for the proposed bicycle parking facilities and/or racks per City standards. 10. The specific art proposals for the project shall return to the ARC for review at a later date once developed by artists and approved by an art jury as overseen by the SLO Arts Council. 11. Details of lighting fixtures shall return to staff for review and approval, either prior to, or along with, the plans submitted for a building permit. The locations of all lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. The lighting schedule for buildings shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets shall be separately submittgd for the project file of the proposed lighting fixtures. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with Section 17.23.050 of the Zoning Regulations. Details of all exterior light fixtures, including site lighting and service area lights, need to be included as part of plans. A note shall be included on plans that "Lenses of exterior wall-mounted lights may be modified or shielding devices added after installation if the Community Development Director determines that they emit excessive glare. 12. A specific sign program for the project shall be to the review and approval of the .Architectural Review Commission (ARC). The sign program shall include information on the sizes, locations, colors, materials, and types of signage proposed for various buildings and project directional signs. Project signs shall be designed to be compatible with the architecture of proposed buildings and to complement the site's setting within both the Chinatown and Downtown Historical Districts. Once adopted, the sign program shall contain provision for the Community Development Director to approve minor deviations to the approved sign program if findings can be made in support of the exception being consistent with the intent of the program, and in keeping with the design characteristics and historical context of the building(s) and/or site. The Director may refer signage proposals to the ARC if there are concerns that a particular design is out of character with the sign program. 13. Mechanical equipment shall be located internally to buildings. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of buildings, which clearly show the sizes of proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment to be placed on the roof to confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line of site diagram may be needed to confirm-that proposed screening will be adequate. Ott` -3 �.._ ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed-Use Project) Attachment CJ ARC Meeting of October 19, 2009 Page 4 14. The required fire risers for buildings .shall be located internal to buildings. Other fire department equipment shall be located internal to buildings where feasible. The externally-mounted Fire Department Connection (FDC) for buildings shall have a chrome or brass finish to the approval of the Community Development Director. 15. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources, or cultural materials, then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR mitigation measures. 16. To the extent feasible, healthy mature trees shall be reused within the project as indicated on the conceptual landscaping plan. Detailed landscaping and grading plans that accompany building permit plans shall confirm proposals for the retention and relocation of existing trees and provide for tree protection measures to be in place during project construction to the approval of the City Arborist and Public Works and Community Development Directors. 17. Tree protection measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall reviewtand approve the proposed tree protection measures prior to commencing with any demolition, grading, or construction. The City Arborist shall approve any safety pruning, the cutting of substantial roots, or grading within the dripline of trees. A City-approved arborist shall complete safety pruning. Any required tree protection measures shall be shown or noted on the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at 781-7023 to review and to establish any required preservation measures to be included with the building permit submittal. 18. A tree protection bond or surety shall be provided to the City prior to demolition, construction, and/or tree relocations to the satisfaction of the City Arborist, Public Works Director, and Community Development Director. The surety amount shall be established in accordance with current standards for evaluating tree value. 19. All new or relocated trees shall be installed per City Ongineering Standards. Existing trees to remain shall be upgraded to include a tree well and grate per City Engineering Standard #8130 where determined feasible by the City Arborist. I ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed-Use Project) Attachment 5 ARC Meeting of October 19, 2009 Page 5 20. All underlying lots shall be merged or lot lines shall otherwise be adjusted prior to building permit issuance if required by the Building Division and/or Planning Division. Contact the Planning Division to initiate the Lot Merger, Lot Line Adjustment, or subdivision process. 21. Encroachments into or construction staging within the public right-of-way will require notification of the affected businesses prior to the commencement of each phase of construction and demolition to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 2. 2. The historic granite curbing located along the Palm Street frontage shall be salvaged and incorporated into the final public improvements to thesatisfaction of the Public Works Director. 23. The existing curb ramp located at the southeast corner of Palm and Chorro serves the pedestrian load from this, development and shall be upgraded per ADA and City Engineering Standards. Any street paving, utility relocations, or upgrades related to this installation shall be completed by the developer. 24. The project shall comply with the Engineering Standards in effect at the time of building permit submittal. The City expects that new standards relating to street furniture may be in effect at the time of building permit application. These aesthetic standards include but are not limited to public benches, matching trash/recycle receptacles, newsracks, tree grates, and pedestrian-level lighting fixtures. 25. The project shall include pedestrian-level lighting, fixtures and the required appurtenances and infrastructure per City Engineering Standard #7915 and the approved downtown lighting plans. Existing cobra head fixtures shall be removed unless otherwise deemed necessary for pedestrian and/or vehicle safety by the Public Works Director. 26. A properly-sized underground grease interceptor shall be provided for any commercial kitchen in the project. This interceptor must be placed to allow convenient access by service vehicles, including grease interceptor pumping trucks. 27. Facilities shall be provided to allow restaurant equipment washing, including but not limited to: floor mats, trash cans, etc. Washing facility shall be covered and connected to sanitary sewer and not be allowed to be discharged to the storm drain or surrounding environment. 28. Manifolds for multiple water meters shall be used to the maximum extent to reduce the number of water services in the street right-of-way (example: the two water services located in front of building D). Depending on the meter sizes required at each location, six meters utilizing one-2" service may not be possible. See City Standard 6260. ��{ x{.-33 ARC 30-09 (Chinatown Mixed Use Project) Attachment 5 ARC Meeting of October 19, 2009 Page 6 29. Each individually-owned commercial unit shall have an individual water meter. Each residential unit shall have an individual water meter. Separate landscape meters for commercial properties should be considered. Building A has eight meters shown. Explain the need for eight meters to serve the hotel and related facilities. 30. All existing water services that will not be used shall be properly abandoned per City standards. 31. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final detailed plan of the trash and recycling rooms, including number and type of bins, and adequate capacity for the different solid waste and recyclables shall be submitted to the City's solid waste coordinator and the local garbage company for final review and approval. This plan shall be consistent with the draft solid waste management plan that accompanied project design plans and also identify areas for storage of fats, oils and grease, and any other waste expected to be generated by restaurant(s) or other types of tenants within the project. 32. The applicant shall submit utility plans during the building permit review process that clearly identify both private and public sewer system details and the point of connection at City main. If any existing laterals are reused, a CCN inspection will be required and shall be submitted to the Building Department during the Building Permit Review Process. All unused sewer laterals shall be identified and abandoned at the City main. B. The ARC continued action to a date certain, November 2, 2009, on the colors and materials for the project. The Commission requested that they see actual paint and material samples for all proposed buildings. The action of the Architectural Review Commission is a recommendation to the City Council and, therefore, is not final. This matter has been tentatively scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on November 17, 2009. This date, however, should be verged with the City Clerk's Office (Ext. 7102). While the City's water allocation regulations are in effect, the Architectural Review Commission's approval expires after three years if construction has not started, unless the Commission designated a different time period. On request, the Community Development Director may grant a single, one-year extension. If you have any questions, please contact me at 781-7168. Sincerely, SGC./ Pamela Ricci, A Senior Planner - cc: County of SLO Assessor's Office � ARC Minutes October 19, 2009 Page 2 Attachment 5 COMMENT & DISCUSSION: 3. Staff: a. Agenda Forecast - Pam Ricci provided an agenda forecast for upcoming meetings. 4. Commission: a. Minutes: August 3 and September 8, 2009 — Both sets of minutes were approved as submitted. At 5:20 p.m., Commr. Weber recused himself for the rest of the meeting due to a potential conflict of interest with Public Hearing Item No. 2 because he lives within 500 feet of the project site. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861. 86 3, &877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street ARC 30-0; Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the Commission recommend to the City Council final approval of the revised project design, based on findings, and subject to conditions. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mark Rawson, applicant representative, provided an overview of plans focusing on changes that had been made in response to ARC direction. Commission Questions of the Applicant: Commr. Duffy asked if a colors and materials board had been submitted. Mark Rawson replied that the colored elevations, perspectives, and bird's-eye views were included in plans that accurately represented proposed colors but that he did not prepare a board with actual color and material samples. Chris Harrelson, applicant representative, discussed the proposed pedestrian pathways and plaza areas within the project. He pointed out that the proposed turf block of the linear park would provide access for emergency vehicles and had the added benefit of providing noise attenuation. Commr. Duffy requested clarification on the proposed outdoor lighting fixtures for both the hotel and Monterey Street buildings. Mr. Rawson explained that the City's adopted downtown pedestrian light standard would be used around the perimeter of the project ARC Minutes October 19, 2009 Attachment 5 Page 3 and that building fixtures would be selected to coordinate with the historic architectural styles selected for the Monterey Street buildings. Mr. Harrelson added that the hotel lighting would utilize soffit and background lighting to create a subtle, soft effect. Staff noted that Condition No. 10 requires lighting fixture details to be shown on elevations and included in working drawings for a building permit and that selected lighting needs to be consistent with the recently-adopted Night Sky Preservation standards. Vice-Chair Palazzo questioned whether chimneys were proposed for the new building on Monterey Street next to Muzio's. Mr. Rawson replied that the features were proposed to house venting and other roof-mounted equipment. Commr. Hopkins requested clarification on the courtyard layout and its openness to the sky. Mr. Harrelson described the courtyard layout and hotel experiences envisioned for the area to maximize flexibility and confirmed that it was open air. Commr. Ehdaie asked for further information on the design of the hotel entrance. Mr. Harrelson discussed the cracked ice paving pattern to provide more of a protected area for pedestrians within the auto court and enhance the guest arrival experience. He added that in addition to the main entrance facing Palm Street that there were three other proposed entrances for guests to access the hotel. Chair Root requested clarification on the bamboo material used in the design. Mr. Harrelson explained plans to use a bamboo product. Chair Root mentioned some new products that embedded the bamboo material in glass that may result in a better appearance and less long-term maintenance. Chair Root requested clarification on project sustainability. Mr. Harrelson described plans to incorporate a photovoltaic array on the roof of the hotel, to utilize expanded green roofs, and to use solar heating for the pool. He noted that all these measures would substantially reduce energy costs. Chair Root requested clarification on the terra cotta material used most prominently in the Palm Street elevation of the hotel. Mr. Harrelson showed a piece of the terra cotta "baguette" and explained how the spacing would be used to create a more transparent appearing screen. There were no comments as part of the public hearing from the general public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commr. Duffy noted his appreciation to the applicant team in terms of responding to the ARC's previous direction and including more details in plans. He expressed his support for the changes made to the Palm Street entry and overall elevation but expressed concern that the Morro Street elevation does not have the same level of detail. He suggested that the Morro Street elevation required further articulation.. He mentioned that the pavilion roof still seemed out of context with the adjacent buildings and that a formal colors and materials board should be provided for the ARC's review. Fliq-3L ARC Minutes October 19, 2009 Attachment 5 Page 4 Commr. Wilhelm noted support for the revised design of the hotel entrance and agreed with Commr. Duffy that the Morro Street elevation could be further articulated.. Mr. Rawson suggested that the model and a colors and materials board could be presented with the Council's final design review of the project. Pam Ricci recommended that the Commission review actual color and material samples prior to the final Council design review. She suggested that the ARC move forward with their recommendation on the overall project at this meeting and make a separate motion to continue project colors and materials to a date certain, November 2, 2009. Commr. Hopkins supported the project as presented; pointing out that the simplicity of the Morro Street elevation was appropriate. Vice-Chair Palazzo agreed with other Commissioners that the ARC needed to review actual color and material samples. Commr. Ehdaie suggested incorporating wood on the facade of the Morro Street fagade. Chairperson Root noted the improvement of the design with each successive presentation to the Commission. He acknowledged the difference in the shape of the pavilion roof compared to surrounding buildings, but supported it as presented. He noted that he liked the Morro Street elevation as shown on current plans, but that he could also support a condition that suggested that there be some subtle refinements made to better articulate it. On a motion by Vice-Chair Palazzo, seconded by Commr. Hopkins, recommending the City Council grant final approval of the revised project design, based on findings and subject to conditions included in the staff report, with the following added condition: The Morro Street elevation of the hotel shall be further articulated using architectural elements similar to those used on the linear park elevation of the hotel to the approval of the Community Development Director as part of the submittal of working drawings. AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Hopkins, Duffy, Ehdaie, Wilhelm, and Root NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Weber ABSENT: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. On a motion by Commr Wilhelm, seconded by Commr. Duffy, to continue action to a date certain. November 2. 2009, on the colors and materials for the project with direction to the applicant to present paint and material samples for all proposed buildings. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Duffy, Ehdaie, Hopkins, Palazzo, and Root NOES: None P(44-.3:7- ARC Minutes October 19, 2009 Page 5 Attachment 5 RECUSED: Commr. Weber ABSENT: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. 4. Commission: b. Recent Project Review— Lessons Learned The ARC discussed recent URM upgrades in the downtown and was especially pleased with the Wineman Hotel and Leon's Books remodels. The issue of downtown business violating rules for window displays came up. The Commission suggested that the applicable sign regulations and guidelines be reviewed in the future to see if stronger language may be desirable. Joseph Abrahams arrived at 7:00 p.m. after the Chinatown Project hearing was closed. He was instructed that he could submit written comments and also attend the Council hearing to consider the final project design. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary I Aftachment DRAFT SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES November 2, 2009 ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Jim Duffy, Suzan Ehdaie, Steven Hopkins, Greg Wilhelm, and Vice-Chair Anthony Palazzo Absent: Chairperson Allen Root and Commissioner Chris Weber Staff: Senior Planner Pam Ricci, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS: There were no comments made from the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street ARC 30-09; Continued Review of colors and materials for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant. (Continued from October 19, 2009, meeting) (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci; Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending the Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed colors and materials, based on a finding of consistency with the architectural design of proposed buildings which she outlined. Mark Rawson, applicant representative, provided a series of color boards including actual paint and material samples for all the buildings within the project. Commr. Duffy questioned whether the use of a rake joint for brick walls in the project was possible. Mr. Rawson noted issues such as water intrusion with the use of rake joints and expressed a preference for flush joints. Commr. Wilhelm questioned if "V"-joints had been considered in the design. Mr. Rawson replied that the design could consider "V"-joints but noted that many historic buildings actually had minimal joints. He supported the look of the flush joint in the project design and noted that the brick blends proposed result in a more natural brick appearance. Commr. Wilhelm questioned the use of full dimension brick in the design. Mr. Rawson replied that full dimension brick is used in certain features such as archways and window surrounds. Oil. -3 q Draft ARC Minutes 1 \�ac h m e nt November 2, 2009 Page 2 Commr. Duffy expressed some concern for the "green" color chip proposed for the hotel since it would be used on some large building surfaces. He requested that the applicant coordinate with staff and field test the color to make sure that it creates the desired visual impact. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: There were no comments made from the Commission. On motion by Commr. Duffy, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie,. to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed colors and materials, based on a finding. AYES: Commrs. Duffy, Ehdaie, Wilhelm, Hopkins, and Palazzo NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Commrs. Root and Weber The motion passed on a 5:0 vote. 2. STAFF a. Running Effective Meetings by Assistant City Attorney Christine Dietnck — Ms. Dietrick presented a review of parliamentary procedure and a discussion of tips for improving the flow and discussion of meetings. Vice-Chair Palazzo requested that the Commission receive copies of the presentation. b. Agenda Forecast— Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 3. COMMISSION: a. Minutes of October 19, 2009, were approved as submitted. b. Recent Project Review— Lessons Learned Vice-Chair Palazzo mentioned that the improvements to Meathead Movers were an improvement to the site. Commr. Hopkins noted that the new bank building at the northwest corner of Prado Road and South Higuera Street was turning out nicely. Other Commissioners agreed and felt that the simplicity of the design contributed to its appeal. i Draft ARC Minutes �- November 2, 2009 Aftachment Page 3 s ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary r • Affachment 6 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM#2 BY: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: October 19, 2009 FROM: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner PROJECT ADDRESS: 861 Palm Street—main address for project files SUBJECT: Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown,LLC, applicant (ARC 30-09). SUMMARY 119COMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Council that the revised project design be approved, based on findings,. and subject to conditions. BACKGROUND Situation A new mixed-use development project known as the "Chinatown Project" includes a.hotel, retail and restaurant uses, offices, residential condominiums, and a parking garage. The site is located within the City's downtown core and consists of eight parcels generally bordered by Chorro, Palm, Monro, and Monterey Streets. These parcels occupy approximately 75 percent of this city block. On April 20, 2009, the ARC conceptually reviewed revised plans for the project and continued action to a date uncertain with direction. The revised plans incorporated several significant changes to the project design including the retention of the general footprints, building elements, and character-defining features of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings, the elimination of driveway access along Monterey Street, and the relocation of the hotel component to the corner of Palm and Morro Streets. Attachment 5 includes the staff report prepared for that hearing which describes in more detail the latest version of the project, the background on the project review process, and an analysis of the main design issues that the revised project precipitated. The Evaluation section of this staff report highlights each of the more detailed directional points included in the ARC follow-up letter from the April 20`h hearing (Attachment 3) and provides both the applicant's response to direction and staff s analysis of that response. The recommendation for project approval includes the findings and conditions endorsed by the CHC with their review of the project on September 28`h. At that meeting, the CHC found that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council (Attachment 4). Chinatown Project(ARC 304;, . 061 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Page t Attachment 6 Meeting Purpose The purpose of this hearing is for the ARC to review the revised project plans, discussion in the Addendum to the EIR, and other supplemental materials and make a determination as to whether the directional points identified on April 20`' have been adequately addressed. If the ARC determines that there are still outstanding issues, then proposed conditions should be amended or additional conditions recommended to address remaining concerns. The ARC's determination on the project design, along with the prior recommendation of the CHC, will be forwarded on to the City Council, who in this case,will take the final action on the project design. Data Summary Project Addresses: 955 Morro Street; 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870 & 886 Monterey Street;.847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street; 984 &986 Chorro Street Applicant: SLO Chinatown,LLC Representative: Mark Rawson Zoning: Downtown Commercial with the Historical Preservation overlay zone(C-D-H) General Plan Designation: General Retail Environmental Status: A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City Council on December 18, 2007 for the Chinatown Project through City Council Resolution No. 9946. An Addendum to the EIR has been prepared to update the project description, impact analysis, and mitigation measures based on the revised project design since the EIR was certified. The Addendum needs to be reviewed and considered along with the Council's review of the final design, but does not require recirculation or a new public review period. However, the Addendum has been prepared in advance of the Council hearing as an informational tool for the CHC and ARC as advisory - bodies reviewing the project 'o i ±°� :y Q,u: ° design and providing recommendations to the Council, l and as a public resource. mi Site Description o The 2.12-acre project site is 1 0 4rPw located on the south side of Palm ry; Street, between Morro and . Chorro Streets, and continues { T down to Monterey Street. It lies K" - within both the Chinatown and p f s } Downtown Historic Districts. 9 '.. _ v �,. " �• ) �: The majority of project site is currently developed with a mix of public and private parking, but also includes six one to , three-story buildings. ' +�N!�--43 Chinatown Project(ARC 30-t._ . 361 Palm Street) 1 October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 3 Project Description The proposed project would include the development of the 2.12-acre site to accommodate a downtown mixed-use center of 226,146 square feet (sf), including retail (49,925 sf), offices (5,630 sf), restaurants (6,000 sf), 16 residential condominium units (19,161 sf), and a 78-room hotel (85,430 sf), in buildings ranging between one to three stories, and with one level of underground parking (30,000 sf/ 74 spaces). A pedestrian plaza is located in the center of the project, which provides entry level access to hotel, retail, and office uses, and is connected by pedestrian walks to Morro, Palm and Monterey Streets. A U-shaped driveway is located off of Palm Street in front of the hotel's main entry to allow for guest loading and unloading activities. The proposed project would consolidate private and public parcels and lead to removal of both private and public structures and surface parking. In order to accommodate the proposed project,three existing buildings would be demolished: 1. 861-863 Palm—Shanghai Low 2. 886 Monterey—Bello's 3. 955 Morro—City offices The Muzio's building would remain and be seismically retrofitted. Much of the interior walls of the Sauer Bakery Building at 848 Monterey Street, and those of the Blackstone Hotel would be demolished, but portions of the exterior walls and architectural elements would be retained, consistent with approved mitigation measures contained in the EIR. EVALUATION The project was originally submitted in 2005 and has been to three prior hearings of the ARC to review various versions of the project, including the ARC's latest conceptual review of the current project design on April 20'`. Each time the project has been revised, its scale and height have been reduced, and many of the issues brought up at the many public hearings have been addressed. As an example of the applicant's response to issues, the current design incorporates the retention of important architectural features of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings into the project that were not reflected in the plans evaluated as part of the certified EIR. With the ARC7s review of the revised project design on April 20`h, the remaining issues with the project were narrowed down to a few directional items. The following discussion takes each of these directional items and provides the applicant's responses and staff's evaluation of them: • ARC Directional Item No. 1: I. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify architectural response in terms of Secretary of the Interior Standards. 'PRY -q`f Chinatown Project(ARC 30-L_, 661 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 4 Applicant's Response: The proposed `Adaptive Reuse' of these buildings will be performed with the goal of • Adapting and reusing as much of the original structures and fabric as is reasonably feasible • Returning the buildings to the original style and character of architecture as previously existed there. • The style and character of architecture proposed is based on the originally constructed buildings as they appeared circa 1900 for the Blackstone and circa late 1880's for the Sauer Building. Blackstone Building As shown on Figure 1, the Blackstone Hotel Building originally had a Main Street style of architecture featuring Italianate detailing including quoins, with plastered walls, articulated narrow F wood-sash window openings with thick surrounds ' and pedimented crowns. Portions of the building _ along Monterey Street had a rusticated fagade .J detailing. i I .a 1. The wall of the Blackstone along Chorro Street, - because it is relatively intact structurally and is Quintma Milding,cirm 1904(rig=1904) part of the original building construction, will Figure 1 —Quintana Building Photo remain and be reinforced and seismically strengthened. Seismic strengthening will consist of a combination of steel moment frames, steel wall girts/braces, and floor and roof anchors to tie the buildings' horizontal diaphragms to the exterior walls. .2. New floor sheathing will be installed over floor framing as necessary to strengthen the floor and/or roof diaphragms. 3. The wall of the Blackstone along Monterey Street is not part of the original building; it was removed with the original widening of Monterey Street and reconstructed at that time in a substandard and modified condition. This wall will be reconstructed to resemble the original building in a `reinterpretation' of the original architecture utilizing similar scale in details, window fenestration, and opening alignments as close as reasonably possible to the original. 4. Building trim, window proportions, and fagade details are based on existing historical photos. These have been used to establish the design details and proportions and will be used throughout the project to replicate as closely as possible the original character. 5. A bronze plaque will be provided which will contain information about the buildings history as well as information about its reconstruction to inform the public. �If I\ \ Chinatown Project(ARC 30-1 361 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Page 5 Sauer Building Figure 2—Sauer Bakery Building As shown in Figure 2, the Sauer Building, like the Blackstone, had a Main Street style of architecture, --- featuring Italianate detailing, with narrow wood-sash double hung _- --- -- windows -- --windows and pronounced lintels, and street level storefronts, but was finished with horizontal siding and a J J f bracketed cornice. 1. The wall of the Sauer building r along Monterey Street is ` constructed of wood frame _ construction and will be remodeled to re-create the window opening pattern that Sam Bnilffin$in the IUDs(on file at suoctS). occurred with the original building configuration. This can be seen in photos of the building from circa late 1880's—6 double hung windows across the upper facade. These windows will be of wood construction and will be modeled after the existing windows that remain on the northeast facade. 2. The existing windows along the Northeast facade of the Sauer will be retained in their existing locations and reconditioned or reconstructed as necessary. Trim and casing will be removed to allow the windows to be restrung as needed. 3. Broken glazing will be replaced where necessary, utilizing glass which can be obtained to match the character of the original `wavy' glass. 4. New horizontal siding will be provided at the Monterey Street facade to recreate the original character of the Sauer Building. This siding will be locally milled to match the pattern and proportion of the areas where siding remains on the existing northeast facade. 5. The original bracketed cornice, which was also removed with the street widening, will be reconstructed in a `reinterpretation' of the original, again as closely as possible to the original scale, and detail, and based on existing historical photos. 6. The un-reinforced brick side and rear building walls of the Sauer will be strengthened and seismically retrofitted utilizing steel reinforcing frames and wall braces. 7. The ovens which exist in the rear building will remain intact with no modifications proposed. 8. All floors within the existing buildings will be strengthened and leveled to accommodate accessibility and new uses. 9. A bronze plaque will be provided which will contain information about the buildings history as well as information about its reconstruction to inform the public. Staff's Analysis: Both the ARC & CHC included this directional item to provide further illumination on the extent which building features would be retained with the proposed adaptive reuse of the two corner buildings. With the detailed information presented above, the applicant has satisfied this request. PNq -q-(� Chinatown Project(ARC 30-L S61 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 6 The certified Final EIR for the project contains Mitigation Measures MM CR4 & MM CR-5 requiring the incorporation of building details as well as portions of existing construction into the new construction. With certification of the Final EIR, the Council amended these mitigation measures to require that a more detailed analysis be conducted of the feasibility of reusing specific significant remaining historical building elements in the new project. Historical reports were prepared by qualified consultants and reviewed by both the CHC and the City Council. The Council concluded that many of the character defining features of the buildings had been lost through street widening and remodeling over the years, but that at a minimum the proposed project needed to incorporate the salvaged Ah Louis bricks from the Blackstone Hotel and to keep the Sauer Bakery oven in place. The revised project would go far beyond this minimum threshold established by the City Council to incorporate specific details and character derived from the late 1800s-early 1900s architecture of the original buildings. With the seismic retrofit and remodel of the Blackstone, the proposal would return the building's architecture to the style of the Quintana Building with the Italian Swiss facade remaining a distinct element along Chotro Street. The proposal with the Sauer Bakery is to renovate it to its original 2-story, wood-sided look and preserve the original 6 window configuration at the second level. The Addendum to the EIR concluded that the revised proposals for the two buildings satisfied the applicable mitigation measures and lessened the impacts to historic resources. This directional item also requested information on how the reuse of the buildings would be categorized under the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Resources. The 9-28-09 CHC staff report supported the applicant's efforts to save more significant portions of the two buildings than required, but acknowledged that the proposals did not fall neatly into any of the treatment approaches are outlined in the Secretary of the Interior Standards. With their review of the revised project plans on September 28`h, the CHC supported the proposals to retain some remaining historic features and-recreate others to make the buildings appear as they did in significant times in their histories. The CHC also determined that the project was appropriate in its setting within the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts • ARC Directional Item No.2: 2. Include details of building features, colors, file work, and railings in the hotel building to play on subtle Chinese motifs. Applicant's Response: Plans and elevations have been further refined to include details which play on subtle Chinese motifs. Refer to Sheets 17. 17.1, 18 and 19. Staff's response: Elements of Chinese architecture have been incorporated into parts of the proposed contemporary hotel design located within the Chinese Historical District, specifically along Palm and Chorro streets, including Chinese `Key Pattern' or `Thunder Pattern' glass motif, balcony railings with Chinese `Eight Diagrams' patterns, a wood screen `Lantern', `Celadon Green' cement plaster, `Cracked Ice' glazing, bamboo lattice, `Ah Louis' brick, and public art with etched graphic historical imagery. The proposals shown on plans are consistent with past Pl-t -� 7 Chinatown Project(ARC 30A. 361 Palm Street) October 19,2009 Attachment 6 Page 7 direction to incorporate subtle detailing and accent colors that convey a Chinese design motif without being contrived or artificial. • ARC Directional Item No.3: 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the projects Chinatown theme. Applicant's Response: Several public art proposals are included in the updated plans. One proposed piece at the Palm Street frontage /entry to the hotel would incorporate historic imagery into a vertical monument that would provide an interesting and historically informative art piece. Other proposals include two tiled mosaics which would relate to Chinese tile and symbolic imagery in the `linear park' along the West pedestrian walkway and a wall mural incorporated onto the side of the adjacent Palm Theatre along the Pedestrian walk/linear park. Staff's response: The art proposals at this time are conceptual and would need to go through established procedures including review by the art jury before coming formally for review by the ARC. The ARC may wish to provide feedback on the ideas for future consideration once formal applications have been made. • ARC Directional Item No.4: 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historic District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof//wall juncture. Applicant's Response: Roof heights and parapet heights are modified to show more variation. Roof wall junctures have been articulated with added cornice treatments and trellis components. Staffs response: Hotel elevations are consistent with this direction through more i apparent changes in roof heights, which = - effectively reduces the apparent mass of the r. building and creates a less boxy appearance, �r Yom,• j . especially along Morro ' Ck I "•_ ! Street (see Figure 3). Islef`� •° r Cornices are provided at the top edges of walls that have a varied colorfrom adjacent wall Fieure 3-Morro Street Elevation of Hotel Q' Chinatown Project(ARC 30-. ,�61 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 8 surfaces and provide more articulation than the previous flat treatment at this juncture, but that are still consistent with the Cotemporary architectural theme proposed. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. Applicant's Response: Window patterns modified to a more regular and vertically articulated pattern. Staff's response: Windows have a more symmetrical and less random treatment than previously shown as illustrated by comparing the previously reviewed and current versions of elevations below. The narrow, horizontal windows on the Palm Strut elevation have been replaced with a more regular and vertical window pattern. vm,Wr�m tttLti, a•.,a:o.:- rmral..r - ' p:epTem Caro 'Isom' T.l9r 7mis 'CehA a Cnu' Dmi�N.MiDe® $[feet W- cho Sheet '.1/f Lua' Y,RiM b' C®6Pbmr_ SAH IcW Bc1 f.Bl T. '+LnE-Bc.-A 4Yi North Elevation-Fadng Palm Street SCA L 6 Previous Palm Street Elevation (reviewed 3-23-09) rx•r Proposed Palm Street Elevation Chinatown Project(ARC 30--L . B61 Palm Street) October 19,2009 Page Attachment 6 C. Articulate the terra cotta screen to create visual interest. Applicant's Response: The terra cotta screen has been articulated into two separate patterns for added visual interest and also incorporates additional variation in spacing of horizontal members to provide greater transparency at locations where window openings occur directly behind the screen. Refer to sheet 17.1 Staff's response: The applicant's changes to the horizontal members of the screen effectively respond to the concern with the transparency of the elevation behind the screen. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway. Applicant's Response: Entries have been further articulated and highlighted with emphasized wood doors stained in dark finish at the main entry and paving treatments to further define the entry. Additional entries added at the Palm Street lounge area to create added pedestrian relationship and interaction at the street. Staffs response:. A projecting canopy creates an overhead feature to the main hotel entry off the auto court further highlighting it from other building elements along Palm Street. The canopy would have a metal framework with a translucent glass roof to tie it in with other building features. The canopy not only Highlights the entry,but also provides weather protection. The lounge area at the corner of Morro and Palm has added entries from the motor court and adjacent streets. A 14-foot wide enhanced paving strip has been added which extends between two planters at the back of the public sidewalk to the main hotel entry. This helps create an articulated pedestrian zone within the auto court area. e. Increase the amount of upper:floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. Applicant's Response: Upper floor balconies and other projections have been added to the Palm Street elevation, and additionally to the Morro Street and South Pedestrian Walkway elevations. Staffs response: The additional balconies and other projections shown on current elevations comply with this direction. • ARC DirectionalItemNo. 5: S. Provide the architectural model of the project block and buildings across the street consistent with Mitigation Measure MM VIS-2 along with the ARC's final review of the project design. Applicant's Response:. A model will be available at the ARC hearing. Chinatown Project(ARC 30-�- _ 361 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 10 Staffs response: The applicant has complied with this requirement. In fact, the model includes blocks beyond those across the street from the project beyond the requirement of the cited mitigation measure. • ARC Directional Item No. 6: 6. Submit more refined versions of the sidewalk management and plazalwalkway management plans. Applicant's Response: A Sidewalk Management Plan, Sheet 6.2, is provided in the latest set of drawings. The goal of the plan was to provide where possible a minimum of 8' of effective clear pedestrian passage along the sidewalks while still maintaining mature street trees. Dimensions are included on the plan to indicate sidewalk passage widths. Due to the retention of the existing historic buildings along Chorro and the existing narrow street, the sidewalks along this frontage are limited in the ability to meet this goal. Sidewalks along the major frontages of Monterey and Palm Streets however, show widths in excess of the 8' goal. A Plaza Management Plan, sheet 6.1 is also included detailing the use of the onsite pedestrian areas. Staffs response: As noted in the attached conceptual report, these two plans were required by Transportation mitigation measures. The applicant has complied with direction to have these two plans as a component of the plans submitted for final design review. They have been reviewed by Transportation Division staff and found consistent with the goals of the adopted mitigation measures. The goal of the sidewalk management plan is to provide for optimal pedestrian flow on the adjacent City sidewalks to the project by maintaining a minimum of 8 feet clear of street furniture and other obstructions where feasible. The plaza/walkway management plan has a similar goal of maintaining at least 10 feet clear on the pedestrian walkways through the site. • ARC Directional Item No.7: 7. Provide more detail on pedestrian amenities in plaza and paseo areas, in particular, adjacent to the Palm Theater. Applicant's Response: Refer to Plaza Management Plan, Sheet 6.1. Staffs response: The text of the Plaza Management Plan details how the various pedestrian areas on the site will function and be managed. The plaza level plan details proposed improvements to the area including tables, benches, landscaped areas, and other amenities. Conclusion The revised project in terms of its scale and mix of land uses creates an attractive and viable design that addresses many of the concerns and issues brought up during earlier public hearings on the project. The applicant has complied with previous direction from both the CHC and ARC to provide more information on the reuse of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings into the project and to modify the design of the hotel building to better comply with Community Design sky' -s-I i r , Chinatown Project(ARC 30-05, ..il Palm Street) Attachment 6 October 19,2009 Page 11 Guidelines for the downtown thereby improving its compatibility with its Chinatown Historical District setting.. OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The comments from other City departments have been incorporated as conditions in the Recommendation below. ALTERNATIVES 1. Continue review of the project. Direction should be given to the applicant regarding desired information or needed revisions to plans. 2. Deny the project. Action denying the application should include the basis for denial. RECOMMENDATION Recommend final approval of the project design to the City Council, based on findings, and subject to conditions. Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form; and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourage projects to be pedestrian-oriented, and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian-oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007 with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently completed Addendum. Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC & ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference Chinatown Project(ARC 30-05,_.01 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attac� �rnPnt 6 Page 12 should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. 3. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 4. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 5. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 6. All City Council approved mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR with Update and Addendum shall be included as conditions of approval, and are incorporated herein by reference. 7. As called for in Mitigation Measure TT-7a, the applicant shall pay parking in-lieu fees for a total of 188 parking spaces prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Permits for the seismic retrofit and remodeling of the Muzio's, Sauer Bakery, and Blackstone Hotel buildings may be issued prior to the payment of in-lieu fees. 8. Consistent with Mitigation Measure TT-4, the building plan submittal shall include a summary of and show all the required and proposed short-term and long-term bicycle parking per M.C. Section 17.16, Table 6.5, and in accordance with standards contained in the 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan update and Community Design Guidelines. Plans shall include the dimensions for, locations of, and details and detail references on the plans, for the proposed bicycle parking facilities and/or racks per City standards. . 9. The specific art proposals for the project shall return to the ARC for review at a later date once developed by artists and approved by an art jury as overseen by the SLO Arts Council. 10. Details of lighting fixtures shall return to staff for review and approval, either prior to, or along with, the plans submitted for a building permit. The locations of all lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. The lighting schedule for buildings shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets shall be separately submitted for the project file of the proposed �IH. I -5-3 Chinatown Project(ARC 30-0,1, .61 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 13 lighting fixtures. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with Section 17.23.050 of the Zoning Regulations. Details of all exterior light fixtures, including site lighting and service area lights, need to be included as part of plans. A note shall be included on plans that"Lenses of exterior wall-mounted lights may be modified or shielding devices added after installation if the Community Development Director determines that they emit excessive glare." 11. A specific sign program for the project shall be to the review and approval of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC). The sign program shall include information on the sizes, locations, colors, materials, and types of signage proposed for various buildings and project directional signs. Project signs shall be designed to be compatible with the architecture of proposed buildings and to complement the site's setting within both the Chinatown and Downtown Historical Districts. Once adopted, the sign program shall contain provision for the Community Development Director to approve minor deviations to the approved sign program if findings can be made in support of the exception being consistent with the intent of the program, and in keeping with the design characteristics and historical context of the building(s) and/or site. The Director may refer signage proposals to the ARC if there are concerns that a particular design is out of character with the sign program. 12. Mechanical equipment shall be located internally to buildings. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of buildings, which clearly show the sizes of proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment to be placed on the roof to confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line of site diagram may be needed to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. 13. The required fire risers for buildings shall be located internal to buildings. Other fire department equipment shall be located internal to buildings where feasible. The externally mounted Fire Department Connection (FDC) for buildings shall have a chrome or brass finish to the approval of the Community Development Director. 14. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources or cultural materials,then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent E1R mitigation measures. Chinatown Project(ARC 30-0�1, .61 Palm Street) October 19,2009 Attachment 6 Page 14 15. To the extent feasible, healthy mature tress shall be reused within the project as indicated on the conceptual landscaping plan. Detailed landscaping and grading plans that accompany building permit plans shall confirm proposals for the retention and relocation of existing trees and provide for tree protection measures to be in place during project construction to the approval of the City Arborist and Public Works and Community Development Directors. 16. Tree protection measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall review and approve the proposed tree protection measures prior to commencing with any demolition, grading, or construction. The City Arborist shall approve any safety pruning, the cutting of substantial roots, or grading within the dripline of trees. A city-approved arborist shall complete safety pruning. Any required tree protection measures shall be shown or noted on the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at 781-7023 to review and to establish any required preservation measures to be included with the building permit submittal. 17. A tree protection bond or surety shall be provided to the city prior to demolition, construction, and/or tree relocations to the satisfaction of the City Arborist, Public Works Director, and Community Development Director. The surety amount shall be established in accordance with current standards for evaluating tree value. 18. All new or relocated trees shall be installed per City Engineering Standards. Existing trees to remain shall be upgraded to include a tree well and grate per City Engineering Standard #8130 where determined feasible by the City Arborist. 19. All underlying lots shall be merged or lot lines shall otherwise be adjusted prior to building permit issuance if required by the Building Division and/or Planning Division. Contact the Planning Division to initiate the Lot Merger,Lot Line Adjustment,or subdivision process. 20. Encroachments into or construction staging within the public right-of-way will require notification of the affected businesses prior to the commencement of each phase of construction and demolition to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 21. The historic granite curbing located along the Palm Street frontage shall be salvaged and incorporated into the final public improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 22.The existing curb ramp located at the southeast corer of Palm and Chorro serves the pedestrian load from this development and shall be upgraded per ADA and City Engineering Standards. Any street paving, utility relocations or upgrades related to this installation shall be completed by the developer. 23.The project shall comply with the Engineering Standards in effect at the time of building permit submittal. The city expects that new standards relating to street furniture may be in effect at the time of building permit application. These aesthetic standards include but are not limited to public benches; matching trash/recycle receptacles, ganged newsracks, tree grates, and pedestrian level lighting fixtures. Chinatown Project(ARC 30-05,_,61 Palm Street) October 19,2009 Attachment 6 Page 15 24. The project shall include pedestrian level lighting fixtures and the required appurtenances and infrastructure per City Engineering Standard #7915 and the approved downtown lighting plans. Existing cobra head fixtures shall be removed unless otherwise deemed necessary for pedestrian and/or vehicle safety by the Public Works Director. 25. A properly sized underground grease interceptor shall be provided for any commercial kitchen in the project. This interceptor must be placed to allow convenient access by service vehicles, including grease interceptor pumping trucks. 26. Facilities shall be provided to allow restaurant equipment washing, including but not limited to: floor mats, trash cans, etc.. Washing facility shall be covered and connected to sanitary sewer, and not be allowed to be discharged to the storm drain or surrounding environment. 27. Manifolds for multiple water meters shall be used to the maximum extent to reduce the number of water services in the street right-of-way (example: the two water services located in front of building D). Depending on the meter sizes required at each location, six meters utilizing one-2" service may not be possible. See City Standard 6260. 28.Each individually-owned commercial unit shall have an individual water meter. Each residential unit shall have an individual water meter. Separate landscape meters for commercial properties should be considered. Building A has eight meters shown. Explain the need for eight meters to serve the hotel and related facilities. 29. All existing water services that will not be used shall be properly abandoned per City standards. 30. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final detailed plan of the trash and recycling rooms, including number and type of bins, and adequate capacity for the different solid waste and recyclables shall be submitted to the City's solid waste coordinator and the local garbage company for final review and approval. This plan shall be consistent with the draft solid waste management plan that accompanied project design plans and also identify areas for storage of fats, oils and grease, and any other waste expected to be generated byrestaurant(s) or other types of tenants within the project. 31. The applicant shall submit utility plans during the building permit review process that clearly identify both private and public sewer system details and the point of connection at City main. If any existing laterals are reused, a CCTV inspection will be required and shall be submitted to the Building Department during the Building Permit Review Process. All unused sewer laterals shall be identified and abandoned at the City main. Chinatown Project(ARC 30-011., 61 Palm Street) October 19, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 16 Attachments: Attachment 1: Vicinity Map Attachment 2: Reduced Project Plans Attachment.3: 4-20-09 ARC follow-up letter&minutes Attachment 4: 9-28-09 CHC meeting update Attachment 5: 4-20-09 ARC staff report with attachments Distributed to the CHC: Copies of the Addendum to the EIR and 11" x 17"project plans G-.\CD-PI.AN\PRICCI\Chlnatown\Staff Reports\ARC 30-09 Chinatown report(10-19-09).doc lk aim V, A VICINITY MAP File No. 69=06 955 Morro; 847, 8619 863, and 877 ,Palm; 840, 842, 8447 8489 868, 870, and 886 Monterey; 984 and 986 Chorro Attachment 6 c ARC Atfkhment Lim�KI-Jallom M-a-1 NMOIVN-IHDI N9TJV QNVHG ZaaqS JaAOD 1.3 nI OU2 gR d -0 LLJ .Y + <1 it �•� --rte.� �; c\C�'`� as '�� •��_ _• I amp r �lmLY t ,w fM I' — ccs'+p; 9' Its ,\ • fir .. _!1!� j/•; r f f AT \ .a s 1 is ,._ _ ,�� '�_,—..,.�:;:::•:- Vr 5 1.4 Wit 1 •• .gid _ f Attachment 6 i �L 1ij1 tea, -' , M; . 1Al f , . f Li u I t t _JLJIJ-JullU t I ( 1 t , i � ( j Attachment 6 LF- (rte /i Ey 4': 4't al ^4- 1 ^ 1 4= 1 i r _ r - lion sent vat am-. .9 FIV t TA 10 p .N10 9 411 AIla, Ill Jr. - Wf Own- 117.4. jr, A . W�q all - , �- - . achment 6 I 6.1 ? C II ad• e„ • r4 y/•'•rl jj -� ,.IV- � � '�� . 1 rF- LlI 1 > i I � 11 i 1 �( " •r 4 1 3/1 3 o - -=� �-` i. t .l1 � �, V•,1 �aM�.rt�lw I�� _� �\ l5i�'fti3fdxn .�1 � _ mmm d..» .gym•.:.-.- �fi H _•L r ►� f, � 1 N�NN N N .;•• :v�Al5:i gs3�.��i t � 1=x!!1 �� - • _�; ._ � -_;�'.�..:,; �1 $��= r 3 •f r -�1 p`,,•`e,r riu '.�, `,°I��1�l�I�Il•1� I� Il' 1 I\ Il 1 I�i, '�. � :r �_ '• e;tll(�IIIII(IIII�II�IIIIII�IIIIII�IIlI�I,I��,�'``ti�•,~*♦�,.. ��. �� ti��l��}I��II��I��II�IIIIIIII�I�III�IIII<<��t'�,"�"�•``'•`"��.`'��'`"� � ,g5 Ali t�;ti�a,}}I�}(III(III(II(11�III�III11111111111 ��IM~"'..�'"tS"`'s�`` o ��+► .,•, • .1�� s illlu•+ , X11 II (I II II it II 11 II I� j' yt '. 1 � .1 � �' a�...m � l l,;,�,`i. .11 ISI((I III III III III III III I I�♦�1,y"*ti�v'.y ^tiff —�� _ �' �•'� , °� '��'li�; ; i �,1111Iillllllllllllllljllllllllll. . ti\ +�. � P.H. ��'��♦��'�+,��`` .x 3IL �►, `=�, � �`�-^.� -• � ,t��duiy}``�„ I II(illl(IIIIIq�� •,,"'"�♦``•, �,�'*�,,► -yam., s tz h1 f� ♦ "+ 1♦ ♦ r! �lillllllllltill ♦��` ♦�� s A. S�F/ ,�/n.k��a�t•I� \\\�I sL \moi{f�,a_'� ��t�{- - f +::_ 6 tit., •�♦ '�.--- '��:, r syn .t i I. t � ,. •mss, it file '� a4Yi4I'I �'� 1. . a,��.�� -is .�.w/.•;;�i �.+.�.�....-- s ri I mar�/.' � � i�.c.� i/mss.-� - Fh yr f 1 nenf / r t Rti �/ .Y•r V1, Ai � ��fi`r1ltl.11fh�7 � r 1 I - 11l 1 � . w � a � 141 Y_ L "GL•I � I L J,, - ( `, f Li " _ZO iment 6 i II 1 _ I I b�; 1 "p LJ 71 ..,; ?PI Utz I r7 r yI i ii � 1 I I II ��as EED� _ f/4 LJ I �chment 6 �t�� . I 11!}+i h +��+r 'w..'.r++4' '*�i*t##yt R: A+ 3 �' w 4. Lw _L ��I��rl .�IId ��'� w) '1'��i •i 1, �,I h'I'I �� , p1 �I�I�Io ll �hfl�'i�lUll,ll'�I '• '. �!� „FI F I t" 'Jill f^ AID, An I� ' •_— I�l�ll ��i Ili, II il � ` ��, 1.✓.ar-.:- l 1: , I I i I I I � I I r� - �'l a•,� � i , i ;l � lf � L f ^ e2 y i.Ilr I I • i q C' p Attachment 6 r4a _ .c v •.. • _ — 1 11 • A • •G-1{ •I `�! � �C_1J iL'_n^ Ll ' 1 •1~�� v ci/ o - o > molit 3' 1 p . t � ,o � 11 _ J I s t 1 1 L .1 � � hmeni Ab V TPW 1 .4 a�. f e-ti9: 1 i i 4jy'J1 f 7 �/I ir ISM �l, �'•'vf j i Attachment 6 / _- 1 1 { 1 al a.a Y n \l 1 v II r�rt�i-r+r y-r}+'x7J" _ ... wr�y't.�,Jp`:Yx_' nr -�+•'lr+n*+ Ti pix Mtlta � I Ii I� n TEE DIY' `�'• .l'13 I i I IL+� � �•.�.. F 114 _ � 11' r r I' I�r !1'11!l;rl �', ' ta#' lit" I °F,d *&�j i I _ J �i Rftach'ment 6 4Y�„��_3' S"{t'i •L,�F' {` .y •'y]:-y�l.TLY4y-iFT'a.V�l-•.F.i oll G �F'-iti`3�W��±+{i �ry{• ' i$t�+� �..'- �.t 1.. � � .J � �`ralT � T .{, '1 7'''1•i!'{- �-yl'"r�-'^�'+j'�F�•�¢� S+�-ia`.��i+c +1�� rr— �� cJl�� 1 i. - y 1 �'y _i- ��', J 1 ; '�1�� I�.►� � �� -�,1 1 � � ,, dj1, ti ,Q I• �” it '" I ' � '� \ _ - r , i�l — If t 1 fitachment 6 lf"` y1r nlY 301, M4,11 , ,:i" '�c^, i •fir A� '!'1 �•�' _ .p 'O A4 f- 44� • a—c. 1� ..t.�.•� r iv i:�Q 1Ho ' , 1 L. 1 \ I' I 1. It 1 1 O .1�i` 1,j1n, ((vL)1�\��yyyyy�`` 7 Ailac pl l exit 6 LIE 54 1�'"r Jlrn� n� ,rlua�t�� 41 MWINES I � j / I/�!}1'IIl11V Yu \ , �\ Z 4 I Attachment 6 ®ice _. cm i C �a _.,, 1 � achmsnt 6 i i -� .w it f ` J ;I Atficac 6 I M1- I ,1 I Itis'1' 11 A i 5 rV I /i 1111 { {C I It ,r i I I 1��1 C 1� .r -1j -- I �I I. � � Ilyll JI 111 i1111'� I' Is list t 1 II ! 1 y I I I 7 Is �I Ill it; 'I' 4T. (}.'.Si*1 II�I 1' �` --�--' ,. Rip. !I10, , „ i U Il! I. lel 11 7 11 Ill Ilr`i 4 is I I ti I I i ( � Attachment 6 �i- iLl j 14 I i o _ h b 1 ,Y r 1 s" I 9 % • Attachment 6 /I h} - I sk It If 77 , r � t tn � , l c I � U �� Attachment 6 Tr- Imo_------ ' - �� .tea 0 f !I -- f . y o —�• ( ) ( ) Attachment 6 Mt.L >>-r O " r n ly O C 16 C:P b i s .l4 a ____� i•" iiil� r'( i(1 i 1 ? of _ o s ate. �( f r �� U S77 v J't:'C�c 174 -I� ,z '< 1 � f ' I f 1 � 1 � rrtttu' w� �`� �—r tea•—n �- 11 � r Attachment 6 ---_nlI ,� I --•�• � X11 y I I I ^ I I I II I � �• _ 1 I�III l��I ,1��'1 I 11 I - 1II ��}' I'�LI�I 1 • 1 i r' l .l• M� I. fl, 1 t I l �.�. I ` •I U , I I r � , . = I uA,flC'1 I� ll �r� �— 1 1 Rttachment 6 t, y !• 4ZI i,wa lac 1 1 i � ., ff Attachment 6 Lllfatl'f1V lYdl(91d !EI !! • —o1 �.:�.. �� rurvw�ssw�.0 asnlwu �j�a iyt F llaux°av mors ani ,l,z 3,: S W4TV+4NVHS m'nosmv7tavw ams i�y' .i1 N +°4s4ei5 uafo�auu uas :�:! �i i srorv..aw aaiwv..aw anpry ° Ab cu 9 � � �� _� a, � $�s� IAAA AA aw: maw �h-�2�2 �d a g 899 figs Egg grR r7F3SIM 5s st bo tb'i9 b 4{t� bo fm go �' yg G 888_888 88888 888�g88-4bo 6 S tb 999 pBig w <a c V ' o ait � �Y�S U 3etu • . f eM..l�� jl l l�l [L � Lll91tl"O.Y 1J310Cd �[p I11 ms�� Ialio9n58uw�id 3�NM �;tln 3Ei� NMOlVN I F+ D • '. ml7g J.'LVD [� .R Ilt W N3Tlb'+4NtlH8 m•vo mv�axavw iw.cow.nos..t lisp +:: r=it U1da7!S➢Ma^O U=1 taus : •i T1s m s aI�i 0I L C TJ(� m I� Ij x i pp 0. n .gall,ogg°n^ y 71 7 y e I m J �.[� b m y j z _ ,_t .Haas oggog°� o•�I_ski � ___ ii I I Attachment 6 ••• � aomseslmtl mu�w.s�m..� �etu i�:, f(.F �+�"`i. amts Y.l�w1.8 eBo<M tl^I 31W JOld S[. �[! °tl BP ,*901 N M70 iV N I H NMW a ONVUS m'uosn vBgaavBa (.•tvio nor-.� i.;l ice! y (wvavtl�a-.i amps "-p IIA! ..nwv4av mq.ya.o..v aacyr UpIdUZv[d bid41 Vil$E@ ��E��x Y'S 4��5 8 6� " � 9 BSp� •�a� � 3�=i��ij pp GF{4+ �yaypgB9[ I5 ayaH pga Bls i Wilt �MB�E <.dga 13yg�x p'.6gpb�.0p7e��i�p� 5�( HIM E�b�.c�'IMI 1'M �M] it �1 59911 �& YbE B5�91�6� .A�EEE�999C o-'S�6.8 6�ftl�&9k < o .L39x.LS Ox11O a �VAAAAAAAAAVA� mak," ® ;�� I �. � �`�• fl• - 0093 t e fL � r L n m Lill � IIto N , \ lip,, US tJ^kit u +I_I.� � �—�,� mm ;� , �-- -_- I - .. � Gni •_ �� -�_ �__ - I1 � araC„ � \\\ 34 O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\0 \ Z Z Z \ \ \ �= \vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv�vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv v vv� vvvvvvvvv v 1391J.LS OHHOHD 0 ) iachmAng g _ LIM:iLN JSik1Yd .�� m.ren•mno.c�.s rau[u4.1 A1wzt .CIlH w¢iwna 4'�i p! W NMOiVN f m � Yt : } z.o N371ytQNtMB mY05mvea�row fwnvUaa-.) c.F d.v[wU aac-.t a�r�s f:tt rrHE iwnwvmnav aarwvwisV aww �dJRCMapis vTWI ISC•6 e1:` %�j S e 5 g m ° L z r > F 5 133111S ODUON 2I,r e� ;�� —I V AAVAAAAAAVAAA �,my-mg v � Is ww tm ` fF �91 .`I ,I r I w if HIT 11 Li t �. aJ r • a 'ae �. �—�—'^5.• U' -7 i. e. H � jj—� 5.7 !PI •n 6 CC) s� i a �VV\VA......\VA \ V A z K N Z\\\ Z \ .RAI .s-$6 Q \\\\\\\\\ 4 ' � `^�,'� _�it Z :�� w_+.,-..� oma. •_�° E .. 21 w F J.93'd.LS 0U'd0HD P�f�-9d Attachment o" .�,...�,. w�wwmromn.° ea�'a<ml acwauu E_1! %io m cn NMOlbsNIF� �, �H ,i , t, _IC ® N3T1tl+OMS vrv'xosnvH aavw xa >>! y �i uEld adraTuirlHvu,Hra Mi li4 ii z�hill Kit. J F .8 1221-ajs 01 c A AAAAAAAAVAA s> H-Flu Ili r£ y . " zd "` B a � ISI I I � ,'.� cod rj u. � —'�,� .) ;'• ;,- r, ,I _P ' . ; n Vis" 20 ---474a wa mm \\\\\�,• _ cn ��., v vvvvvvtriv\vv - e �� :; 7 w Zn JAI eg g � �` \ \\ � e � F .� r- � I F r,< � � w z z z \ \ \ 0 \\ \\ G J.3ad.LS O'aHOH:) Attachment 6 41=roMJOU W 1i1 r;d. [y; em�st tm( A..JJ L �� N M Olb� rfTTf4Q�ZfQ Vitl'NOS.Ntl8lI8VW (a•Ltntl.¢A•.t tail iii �„ (wvoaU ma-.] a]rn r;�: i8p mwavm_v �vmna+w UId A)!IRfI imildwuo,awi iaas ii:l 1.d C. t ,7 m a ¢ d c U ssss —ss--ss--ss--ss Mill - -- . i,w - s;--ss—=ss--ss 132NIS OHUONI ° II �J5 'Ell I 'a @I g � SS s�55 .� �wvw�vvv�vvlvvV wvvvvvvvv� vvvv � � � � � \ \ c \ y \\\\\\\ ' ss \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\� \\\\\\\\\\\\\ m %A 1 _ -Il 1_71 1 : ,I. 1 I I__! . \y Z33NSS O�IlIOH:) $S--SS--SS--SS--SS--SS--SS-�SS--55- {D 4/ � � • r � ) � ; L i (?1S" T � e c[t�:a�u3load "i? i 1 l ��„ rom[asliwl mx�wM1sala—1 3sounna i;�i '�' F s i=1 m1 b. w bOIX K w( :H Y�.OLI T.1 N3,;d,a1Ma m N M Olaf N I H � �� 1 =1 i W9RK1 AA-.t 31VJ5 I.R. HH{{! uBld Su3pwD ICl Waauco TWt leas i1�3 &AR Ql 0 ._ C7 r U aeaxcs o•xow i ri -•' �0 V i- m�f i�N' - ' V A u Ind 0 L-:=lcnQ-j - tnv•a4 oaaoxo i � � � 1 ate. mmcuum m•wlsM�a �mna .��"�.� w.«en�lownw tmC'oC 4^I awaima [�!Js ao F ® walaa� i m • = � N M Olaf N I H = _ = N3lltl+ONb2f9 m'Hosnva xxvw �•1 y u.n•m Aa..l E•,f 0.9mt oX..I ams ::g: lag u jd o 0(1/¢¢Id a4is&M Ell auu:aus iia i gig amaw.mv aw+rv.m... aw.ry aed!lili o 1 '`^�!- _4r_ 1.a9,11is, o�tt)1oW) is ter. .{8- 1•- i .'� /T�: ;. T J^ 8# j�. 3 1 @ e� - I -) a _-,I®�--, • �.' Cr li Hu h WW Eli _ O a I` _.xODe i vI LL ;ec j F it • ce 011 h ----- e & € pIt 3cn fie HS «slowh�sv s+w+wn�1 � � � 1 I I � i I�-1� � �'• 1 F 8 a 17��. �I i(�: + '.�. ...•.� _+,•my r. P ,��,_`F - Az �� r co 1 , L— I -•�i"r J I i J e d .E33u1$ 0lI4I�QA�� Altachrn'-.nt 6 a�~•+1 =�`. uNPmTifbl ImWq.69uN�„W 3R]IMlld ;`�p:p 1{F{ F . . ��ti.�. overs w'm,ro�ms e0°L'st Lml Sava laid ' f �,' NMOIVN I H D n� JNI 'S1_tel N3llV+aNV88 OTlwrno�,PO05 UL9lD JJ3LH]Nv °Eg� j�: 1Rl6 m'NOs,nvaMavw 'F ,51 y b.nau7 ae•a ams ,{ � }}Pi w.rwv.wav aaNw.+�v woven '`U[l lana']42D.4S fasa)UOW aWl1SN6 ; ;E 5I� Q > �Y�g� $8 p� � �� "��\ 5V �VV\V\AVVVVV\VV\VAVAAAVAVAVAVA\\V\VA\\\VAV\\VAVVVQ a e �� S � .,.�\V\\\\\\\VA\\�VvvvvvvvvvvvVVVVVvvvvvvvvVVVVAVVwA\vAvvvvvvvvvvvvvvVVv� 3An m F 12aX.LS OHHOW Cal -CO AAAAAAA�AVwv��VAVAA��VA�AAv��AA�A�VAA�VAAAV�AAA\� � � m - -r. 3 CQ ar` _ �,ti nnnl IIIuii �. p I q ,L�'•I � .ea Jj a Oil �� 1 t o AfE h I � z c 133a.LS OldllOHZ) g� kil.achmijent 6 if �`- mAfeLlNl I ImMI^swrv�gd ']Sdw1d i!i! `•' F ji•w.•:: adcs vl'm•NOmt.s6WC YILPf 1tvOJOld L,t! )e • ,. IaMUH sr N MOl�f N I H � memos aar0 i`jU fAA S r--4® N3-nV+ NVHS m:uosnv aavw ..1 ;,- if (wepwd aM-a :abler ;I AA[ miel]!aAaj eze!d suu.ln% II. ddb avn.rv+.�v av'r+v+•aw yy ameuv y S pA d fi 'p g g9 yga s i .aJ ea6. 5w5 q z J. z U ��;w I a 3 N I S Oaa0IN p f P. n i o IF b ® • 4 t z a I m --. • �I I 1 •-I. ti i I •v 1 o f I 1 1 1 1 1= 1 1 � r_ a � 4'• m B H • II 11 11 #y1[• II f It II 1 dfj 1 � � C A• $8 � °��'I 116, �'�.A S — �N , a $M MMU31Rd mM rn �Y \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ w INA A\.A� AAAAAAAAA I F \ VAAAVA\\ \ z —\VAAvVAVvvVAAAVAVAAvvV�v VAvAAAAAA �VVVVVAVV\VA\VAVAAv\ Emm!mull wvAAvvVVAVVA \� " LoSA II .LHHILLS O'd'dOHD o P14t, -92 ( Attachment 6 _ Llt4a"(aJ JJ310tld •Y:F i!� �.:+iT pp[Pl6il{W imwaae�nlmu asnrow lyEj !4i F ��u wru Y]'m^�mlas �—__—• bo(Q'sl Gml 31vaJma `, N M Olaf N IrH N31lV+QNVNB vn'rvosmva avw t ;sI h (1�9VK�.trRC-.i 21Y.I5 Y{&) E�9 aawv�mav vwq+rv..lsv aeawv SUUId L laearl paAS upa Jrng a a yam= �a 9a . � 3 0.. U kh3 � w Ir 1 °o IP u \ ! 7 o Y' li \ i LW.L9 �,,t ]I— L � I •m ' I EFT Inn .1 _L r _ 00 fu Y�Q 4 L p x _l �..�. m ��UeOlsa}>ad •;fir � O � � !n c5 , �- \ �F— �.$ FRI FEMMMI vvvvvvvvovvvvvvvvv V A A v z oa \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\ \\z\\\ O ActachMPInt Lim mlmlm C%4 w INMOiVNIHPaDI hSTIV QNV88 rl Sueld Z FaA--1 PaUS LUTUCI > E 49 Z E U3 0 En E 0 C04 7E 133NIS ouuow TT M, I Fig MIN, AMA U� 9z E uj L) R z N 0 Z z 133HIS OU'dOH:) El Ltachmenf 6 J r NMOlafN I HDI ,, �c�, N3llb'+pNtlN9 m•n��itxvw +,;'• 3`: S� OF avppv..r+�r vmwrv..°w a°pW 6UId£TaAaq»S U-"-Cl CV) v 2p17 gg 2 n Ln .7 h d N iaaa.LS 011x0N o ,vvvvvvC\C\vvA�vvv y Z qq g I C U '.m a F85 = d q m z c m I F z On j 0 a 3 3 3 x < § 3 3 Li -------- I I N e W Y \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ 111MUNIUM9 a s \ z z �\ \\\ll .LaalISS 0lI1I0140 o Attac"ment 6 -ON 1031M mvc= NMOIVNIHDI N311V+GNV'dS wow moo Paslerua iaA@q a eid III ZR ir O Lj I L Y, -:--I =lj L lA= V T-1—i Foimrl'L�� ca In M, jjr U a > In Mill Ell -1 r bo - —————————— Q f Lim-«:l.—akw i} a 111 NMOlVN I H NnV+ONVUS m'Hos vannvw I vVWY.�Y auPWY•�V lilyvy aMld JOU PaSxqNH C la^a7 Ur[Pd L J, � ]I s . p � � I 1. 1 c • � � � � L J P \ gg A 28�n i 9 ! H 'E A's 97j a S b � us m � m .5m --�- �. 9 3 m J row= Lltmtl,'�,�, �•�� III • v� ��- mmwc/wc1 1 I I�w•sv�rv•m �anm ilE� `;: .ar.w•mlon.l l.c ms•n Lml �I.w�ou t:'s L.. F- Attachment 6 m N MO1V'N I HD N3TN�ONV2l9 m�vosnvazww , I+�LRW AP-.t LJ• N pworrJ as-.I mva {��I qip avwvy+�v mw>•v,cw anWv UVId J0021 nwae0 awc Laos :`t:.` 1h v r a iHaxis oxaow o - - � .• - - I - �.=.-1>� � v v vvvvvA\�Av\\wvv vvvvvvvvvv _sv I� i 1 \ •9 8 .� fy � � � VIII „I I yil� T.1 I rY JJf111.T1,1 I yy? � Y.�.. � •• 1j a 1. ap .8• 99 � Ir'n r 0z `} 6 S 5 1111 Ililuili 9 8 m�� L Lr �. (7. yil I,rll.11,.. C7 1 i'F /gym Q: E- go go IY�11 h m 'I YIY n �i IIII v tiatyn ° Js;sar ein �� L>: I I II I II � 1 illi a.r�t�l I itc_(i,4`i 1 r'4. �e�a�aa 11 t P - z m ® a o o Iio n m -LE- a a ate; I E d 4 Z U \ N v vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv\ \ I m 8 \ \ a z \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ LJ \\\\ \ \ SHHB.LS 01d2I0HD o �� /Olt Attachment 6 Lim-mi-mlou �MW )rll 51 JILL LLi KaLUL� NMOIVNIHD r--1 unw+Owme SU04L'AaG JO!Jalx3 2E 31 wx ba w CE9 r 0 0 [Emo M9 [Eg 033 10 I 1C t 'v -A Aifachment 6 r, alma oYuabaa alp 1�1 ••��'• YYMbw*��1.8 ea¢'¢•+mlw.Idx isj: `7' •••�• isA{noxr N M O IV N I H M3TId+CNVMB m'Hosmvn ymw FF .j: H r U>•9PW dd-.8/I 31YJ5 I.�F $Ev Suc g8Ad13 PalmN3 a....ian¢ il'i i,•( �\ r rid M gyp', ', jp •a 5 O - c m w m N jig i jU _ 0 •._ .'1 W ��l r _ W Bo it , � �Q" /n i—• i � �y Of 5$ 17nO J i F[Y AA U muw•s�a �ro fy#, fry /tl\0�iVN...Inl 1 m�•a�t atw.una �:�t ' i mN m�wvvs acuv ,i.� �fe m w:nw+OMM6 m:uosnvaxevw m r-'-4 [ay' s, suope"TH paSzulug auu leas .�,l R!t F O a U E gg o rc � C D Ll� a - s • aC� N .z Is Attachment $ sly it lv , N M Olaf N I H NTM+ONVdS m uosmvxnnw t,27 ! - 2 11.tR[ll O.l-AI/1 jai: iiE N U+ovrO oa-.ert ams i;s3 air saogs^aT3 PasnN3 °'131 tff-0b N1. e@ ,i s 5 E j �M u IW• s y0 t LU gra I N jjg 5 '0.5 CID n C ttl w 8 W i � N gal 11 Z5 .n. _. 4 1 AI-.L : I 1 , bl I 11 U i 1 §14 A-. I Ph� -/09/ 1 At"Lachment 6 NMOIVN I F+ ^ N3lT/+ONV!!B m:uosmraMavw o-.4aro As-. �:gf Ali suopenaII ioin7x3 auu�s "t',t I!i All E: —y g 24 Oa F ¢y9p Ey - 03Y J o tt s � _ z .. t- o � 0 -} y ti i Att cment b ��•,� amo�utwtl Imnw�S�ww �n,xna -�e fy F :'—�.+`,: swccn'�.r��s sos•¢•mt a[va,ma ['.If '{{ y {'•� N M O lbs N I H m�.w•nvas a� . { e m N3llV+4NtR18 m:rosmvaAavw nano o-a-. ;: m r'1 h•va,,ep'Uo-n�-.i yams ,:�t Aie y.mprv•.cw mwrv.c—. �.ww SIiOE ta.Y^"S¢pa IS}3 F9 • a jL W. >I IF- I r €a L �K - ao Attachment 6 woo 111H sl�ll[lilmv NMOIVNIHDI !!EA N3M+ONV'dS —11,7 it 1p EE=— Ea Pit ag E Z -a V l Atfachmp.nt Mz; INMOIVNIHDI V: X N3'TW+OMS ro.Zmo&a-a 0.9m&. -a sUOI .4PAarl 10113W3 o LSF 96 'IEEE CC 'Y'l C3, Uy Attac`;rrient u _�� Cll�d�'ON1Yi1DYd `x[} {, _ [. 1 ^mit 0�f1[l01 I4MWn6$9�id 3A]Itl.'Id i3�5 �'. WMb YJmly mle6 [ ]i{ > ry N MOl�f N l F� , 'i311V+CINUE1v JTlwmwmp015 'J.MRD t�°.F :PE NO N3ll`d+pNtlUB vn•wnsxvanrvw Eli +>nwrv•��v �vw+rv:+av a.w+ry suOpooS""'l'pnQ ' P C O h CO C a 'O u t m O A 4 9 9 9 m -1 fel �� -�15 Attachment 6 moi. �� runoo�cAm�a avwu 6�; po NMO!V-N-1 HD IDRUHWV : N�v �ae�dVIV:�OSlEVH1HYW (s eni�.DPr=.� '��1 iiy N �rv.v.w�v �w�wv+sw a.xyvv SQOA�"":YImH aun ISOs i 1'.: F�4 C wzl N n � IZE L�3 Ai Ga S3 (EB lEa G^ rPR 6B l s Attachment G • _ Ii�Illllll I�IIIIIII I III IIB��l�� @I I III IIIA � Cly ® SA1'11615 OBISPO _ Community Development Department • 919 Pa Attachment -3 April 22, 2009 Mark Rawson SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 1085 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 SUBJECT: ARC 69-05: Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project Gentlemen: - The Architectural Review Commission, at its meeting of April 20, 2009, continued the project to a date uncertain, with the following directional items to be addressed in revised plans that return to the ARC: 1. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify architectural response in terms of Secretary of the Interior Standards. 2. Include details of building features, colors, tile work, and railings in the hotel building to play on subtle Chinese motifs. 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historical District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. c. Articulate the terra cotta screen to create visual interest. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway. e. Increase the amount of upper-floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. 5. Provide the architectural model of the project block and buildings across the street consistent with Mitigation Measure MM VIS-2 along with the ARC's final review of the project design. OThe City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. PNS Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. ARC 69-05 (Chinatown MixePubse Project) A tachime'1t 6 ARC 04-20-09 Meeting Page 2 6. Submit more refined versions of the sidewalk management and plaza/walkway management plans. 7. Provide more detail on pedestrian amenities in plaza and paseo areas, in particular, adjacent to the Palm Theater. If you have any questions, please contact me at 781-7168. Sincerely, V Pam Ricci, AICP Senior Planner cc: County of SLO Assessor's Office ARC Minutes J Attachment 6 April 20,2009 Page 5 The motion carried on a 5:1 vote. On a motion by Vice-Chair.Palazzo, seconded by Commr. Hopkins to approve the Negative Declaration with Mitigation Measures, and to approve the relocation of the Parsons House to 464 Buchon Street. AYES: Commrs. Palazzo, Hopkins, Duffy, Ehdaie, Wilhelm and Root NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Weber ABSENT: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote. The Commission took a break from 6:50 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 3. 955-Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986_Chorro.Street. ARC 69-05; Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown LLC, applicants. (Pam Ricci) Commr. Weber earlier recused himself due to a potential conflict of interest. Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending that the project be continued to a date uncertain with directional items to be addressed in revised plans that return to the ARC. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mark Rawson, project representative and architect, explained the revised project plans, including the adaptive reuse of the Sauer Bakery and Blackstone Hotel buildings and the influence of Chinese motifs in the site planning and architecture. Chris Harrelson, Brand Allen Architects, noted how the scale of the hotel was compatible with surrounding buildings. He noted that the Chinese influences in the architecture were subtle and not contrived. Commr. Wilhelm asked for clarification on building materials including the terra cotta screen. Mr. Harrelson provided an example of the terra cotta baguette material proposed. Commr. Ehdaie questioned if there was an arched gateway similar to Chinese elements staff provided in their presentation. Mr. Rawson replied that there was not a traditional arched gateway, but that the transition under the building bridge to the pedestrian paseo provided a more abstract gateway feature. ARC Minutes April 20, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 6 Commr. Duffy questioned whether more glazing could be added to the Chorro Street elevation of the new Quintana Building. Mr. Rawson replied that the current version of the building has limited openings in this wall. Commr. Duffy questioned the vehicular oriented entrance to the hotel site on Palm. Mr. Rawson acknowledged this citing the competing needs of the site. Chair. Root requested clarification on access to the space between the hotel and the Palm Theater site from bordering properties. Mr. Rawson replied that formal connections to adjacent properties that are not a part of the project was not planned but that access to the new paseo from these properties would not be expressly precluded. He noted that the theater currently has an exit onto this area. Commr. Duffy asked about the intent of the V-shaped sod roof form for the hotel meeting room. Mr. Harrelson replied that it was to provide interest to hotel guests looking out their windows along with shade and some capture of roof drainage.. Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the applicant's efforts to preserve. more portions of the existing historic buildings in the project beyond the minimum thresholds established by the City Council. He expressed concerns with the ribbon windows of the hotel and the mansard roof and other details of Building C. Joe Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, felt that the project should be more welcoming to the public given its proximity to Mission Plaza. He suggested that there be a water feature in one of the outdoor spaces to create a mini Chinese park setting. He mentioned that the walkway area from Palm Street appeared barren. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, expressed concerns with the design of Building C. He stated that there was not a sympathetic architectural dialogue between the historical side (Monterey Street) and the contemporary side (hotel on Palm Street) of the project. He was concerned that a wind tunnel effect would be created along the walkways of the current design. Christopher Mechum, San Luis Obispo, noted that he understood the applicant's point about not having contrived Chinese architecture in the project, but suggested that it may be important to consider architectural elements that tourists recognize as Chinese. He felt that the public paseos and plazas were under-scaled and that the green roof was contrived. He added that he would like to see the project incorporate more sustainable features. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Chair. Root asked for a vote to continue the meeting past 9:00 p.m., with which the Commission agreed. Chair. Root noted that he liked the applicant's direction regarding a Chinese expression. He suggested that additional details such as a glazed tile bulkhead and public art would ARC Minutes April 20, 2009 Attachment 6 Page 7 take the expression farther. He mentioned that more regular windows would assist the hotel design in being more consistent with the Community Design Guidelines. Commr. Duffy mentioned that the hotel site was a good corner for contemporary architecture, but that the entry should be inviting for pedestrians as well as vehicles. He suggested looking at the proportion and massing of building walls versus glazing. He noted that the exterior detailing needs refinement and that the terra cotta screen could be overdone. He added that the outdoor spaces were like rooms and needed to be well designed. He suggested looking at the gateway concept in terms of the form and processional nature of entries. Commr. Wilhelm requested that refined plans include more information on building detailing and that all elevations of proposed buildings be included. He felt that this project provided an opportunity for a design connection to the Ah Louis building. He suggested that there be gateway features on both the Palm and Monterey Street sides of the project.. He felt that the main paseo needed more features to soften the spaces including benches, public art, and landscaping. He requested that the hotel incorporate more playful architectural elements into its contemporary design. Vice-Chair Palazzo agreed that the paseos and plaza areas should be inviting. He felt that the new design for the Blackstone should recreate more of the original features of the Quintana Building like the window design. He noted that he liked the juxtaposition in the project of classic and contemporary architecture. Chair. Root suggested sustainability be more of a design focus. Commr. Hopkins expressed that the project design keeps improving and thought the Monterey Street elevation was incredible. He liked the contemporary architecture for the hotel but felt that there needed to be further refinements to Building C. He appreciated the architects' presentations about the project's design motivations and nods to Chinese motifs. Commr. Ehdaie felt that the project would be a beautiful addition to the downtown and attractive to tourists. On a motion by Commr. Hopkins, seconded by Commr. Ehdaie, to continue the project to a date uncertain with the directional items included in the staff report with the following modifications: 1) Reword Item # 2 to say: " Include details of building features, colors, the work,-and railings in the hotel building to play on subtle Chinese motifs": 2) Item # 4c - Substitute the word."Articulate"for "Minimize": 3) Add Item #1 "Provide more detail on Pedestrian amenities in plaza and Paseo areas, in particular adjacent to the Palm Theater." AYES: Commrs. Hopkins, Ehdaie, Palazzo, Wilhelm, and Root NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Weber ABSENT: None Attachment 6 ARC, Attachment 4 . Meeting Update - - CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE September 28, 2009 Monday 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Committee Members Barbara Breska, Dan Carpenter, Katy Davis, Dean Miller, Jeff Oliveira, Vice-Chair Chuck Crotser, and Chair John Fowler. All members were present STAFF: Associate Planner Tyler Corey, Senior Planners Pam Ricci and Jeff Hook, Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment on topics not on the agenda. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Thank Chairperson John Fowler for his service on the Cultural Heritage Committee. Committee members and staff presented a card and flowers to Mr. Fowler and thanked him for his service on the Committee.. MINUTES: Minutes of August 24, 2009, regular meeting were approved as submitted. INFORMATION ITEM: 1. 536 Marsh Street Historic Jack House fire sprinkler installation project. (Michael McGuire, Project Engineer). Staff member Michael McGuire explained the project and described measures being taking to minimize the visibility of the proposed fire sprinklers. Committee members thanked Mr. McGuire for his presentation. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 1. 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, &.877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street. ARC 30-09; Review of a revised design for the Chinatown Mixed-Use Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant. (Pam Ricci). Pam Ricci presented the staff report and explained design changes since the last time the CHC reviewed the project. Project architect Mark Rawson presented detailed models showing how the project fit into the scale and character of the Downtown Historic District. Under public comment, Elizabeth Thyne and Vangeli Evangelopoulos spoke in support of the project. Bob Vessely disagreed with use of the term "adaptive reuse."to describe the proposed changes to the historic Blackstone Hotel because of the extent of demolition proposed He added that public access to the historic Sauer Bakery ovens was required by the Council and should not be a tenant option as suggested by the applicant. He submitted a detailed letter outlining his comments on the EIR Addendum and CHC staff report. After lengthy discussion, and on a motion by Vice-Chairperson Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the Committee voted unanimously to determine that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical CHC Meeting Update, September 28, 2009 Attachment G Page 2 Districts, and recommend final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council, based on findings, and subject to conditions. Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourage projects to be pedestrian-oriented, and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian-oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007 with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently completed Addendum. Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC and ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted for a building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. ® The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Please contact the City Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. .F,ry ` �:� � Attachment 6 CHC Meeting Update, September 28, 2009 Page 3 3. Plans shall include window details indicating the style and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills, surrounds, recesses, and other related window features. 4. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 5. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 6. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources or cultural materials, then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR mitigation measures. 2. 863 Pacific Street. ARC 51-09; Review of three new dwelling units on a Master List Historic property; O zone; SLO Investments, Inc., applicant. (Tyler Corey). Tyler Corey presented the staff report and described the project. Project representatives Carol Florence and Steve Puglisi responded to the staff report and described how the project would be integrated with the historic Zion Lutheran Church site and building. There was no public comment. After lengthy discussion, and on a motion by Committee member Miller, seconded by Vice-Chairperson Crotser, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend the ARC approve the proposed project, subject to the following findings and conditions. Findings: 1. As conditioned, the proposed colors, materials and architectural details of the new building are compatible with the historic building and consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. ® The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services,programs and activities. Please contact the City Clerk or staff liaison prior to the meeting if you require assistance. -PH•�-�� Attachment 6 Attachment 5. CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT ITEM#3 BY: Pam Ricci (781-7168) MEETING DATE: April 20, 2009 FROM: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner PR FILE NUMBER: ARC 69-05 (new file No. ARC 30-09) PROJECT ADDRESS: 861 Palm —main address for project file, other addresses for site listed on agenda and below. SUBJECT: Conceptual review of a revised design for the Chinatown mixed-use development project bordered by Chorro, Palm,Mono, and Monterey Streets in the C-D-H zone. RECOMMENDATION: Continue the project to a date uncertain and provide direction to- 1) Provide additional information regarding how portions of the existing Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings will be retained and used in the remodeled structures; 2) Modify the design of the proposed hotel at the corner of Palm and Morro Streets to improve its compatibility with the Chinatown Historical District; and 3) Include additional information required for final review of the overall project design. BACKGROUND: Situation A new mixed-use development project known as the "Chinatown Project" includes a hotel, retail and restaurant uses, offices, residential condominiums, and a parking garage. The site is located within the City's downtown core and consists of eight parcels generally bordered by Chorro, Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets. These parcels occupy approximately 75 percent of this city block. In 2006-07, the project was reviewed at several public hearings before City advisory bodies, including two meetings before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) for conceptual review of earlier versions of plans. On December 18, 2007, the City Council certified the Final EIR and Update for the Chinatown Project through City Council Resolution No. 9946. On February 23, 2009, the current version of project plans was submitted to the City. The purpose of this hearing is to acquaint the ARC with the latest version of plans and to get the Commission's early feedback on the design. After the conceptual review, the applicant will make revisions in response to early direction and resubmit plans to the City for final review of the design. The revised plans will be routed to City departments for a determination of final conditions of approval. An Addendum to the EIR will also be prepared based on the revised plans. The revised project plans will return to the CHC for a determination of the project's appropriateness in the Downtown and Chinatown historical districts, and then be scheduled before the ARC for design review. At the December 18, 2007 hearing where the Final EIR and Update were certified, the City Council directed that the revised project design be finally approved by them. SKY -�a3 ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre Attak-hment 6 Page 2 ARC's Purview with Conceptual Review 1) Become acquainted with the revised plans. Both the applicant and staff will make presentations on the revised plans. Commission members should ask questions if they do not understand components of the design. 2) Provide feedback on components of the design. In the Evaluation section, staff has identified two main issues with the revised project: 1) architectural style and character of the remodeled Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings, and 2) the contemporary architectural style of the proposed hotel in the context of the Chinatown Historical District. The ARC is not limited to discussing these two items only, but staff identified them as the most significant issues with the continued review of the project based on past project testimony and the scope of the revised project. 3) Identify additional information that will be needed with the final review of plans. In the "Staff Recommendation" of this report, staff has created a list of directional items for the ARC to use in making recommendations on ways that the revised project plans could better respond to historical preservation and compatibility issues. The ARC should use this as a starting point for their recommendation and may make changes to listed items and add new directional items. Data Summary Project Addresses: 955 Morro Street; 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870 & 886 Monterey Street; 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street; 984 &986 Chorro Street Applicant: SLO Chinatown, LLC Representative: Mark Rawson Zoning: Downtown Commercial with the Historical Preservation overlay zone(C-D-H) General Plan Designation: General Retail Environmental Status: A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City Council on December 18, 2007 for the Chinatown Project through City Council Resolution No. 9946. Site Description The 2.12-acre project site is located on the south side of Palm Street, between Morro and Chorro Streets, and continues down to Monterey Street. It lies within both the Chinatown and Downtown Historic Districts. The majority of project site is currently developed with a mix of public and private parking, but also includes six one to three-story buildings. Proiect Description The proposed project would include the development of 2.12-acres to accommodate a downtown mixed-use center of 226,146 square feet (sf), including retail (49,925 sf), offices (5,630 sf), restaurants (6,000 sf), 16 residential condominium units (19,161 sf), and a 78-room hotel (85,430 sf), in buildings ranging between one to three stories, and with one level of underground parking (30,000 sf/74 spaces). A pedestrian plaza is located in the center of the project, which provides !a-_7 ARC 69-05 (861 Palm StrtL.) - \ Attachment 6 Page 3 entry level access to hotel, retail, and office uses, and is connected by pedestrian walks to Morro, Palm and Monterey Streets. A U-shaped driveway is located off of Palm Street in front of the hotel's main entry to allow for guest loading and unloading activities. The proposed project would consolidate private and public parcels and lead to removal of both private and public structures and surface parking. In order to accommodate the proposed project, three existing buildings would be demolished: 1. 861-863 Palm—Shanghai Low 2. 886 Monterey—Bello's 3. 955 Morro—City offices The Muzio's building would remain and be seismically retrofitted. Much of the interior walls of the Sauer Bakery Building at 848 Monterey Street, and those of the Blackstone Hotel would be demolished, but significant portions of the exterior walls and architectural elements would be retained, consistent with approved mitigation measures contained in the EIR. Summary of Proiect Changes Back in September of 2007, the applicant submitted revised plans that were substantially reduced in scale from the original submittal evaluated in the Draft EIR for the project. Those revised plans substantially reduced the height and scale of project buildings and were found by staff, the CHC and ARC to better fit the site and respect the context of the setting. On February 23, 2009, the applicant submitted an updated set of revised plans. Once again the project has been scaled back in terms of its size and some buildings have been reduced in height. Other key changes include: A) The hotel building is now proposed at the corner of Monterey and Palm Streets instead of the corner of Monterey and Chorro Streets. B) The driveway serving the previous hotel location off of Monterey Street has been eliminated allowing for uninterrupted pedestrian flow along the public sidewalk. C) The general footprints of the Blackstone Hotel, including its Swiss-Italian component, and the Sauer Bakery will be retained with the project. The intention is now to structurally reinforce and seismically strengthen the URM components of the buildings and to retain significant portions of the facades and other building features with the remodels and seismic upgrades. D) The Blackstone Hotel is planned to be remodeled to recall the architecture of the original Quintana Building, rather than retain the Streamline Moderne fagade. E) A new one-story building is proposed adjacent to the Sauer Bakery building and will be separated from Muzio's by a plaza and pedestrian walkway area. F) The new Building "C" where the Bello's building is currently located will be set back from the adjacent Feliciano Building at the corner of Monterey and Morro Streets to address previous concerns with the loss of access to second-story windows along the shared property line. 1P ff ARC 69-05 (861 Palm StrI6,q Attachment 6 Page 4 G) Building "C" is now shown immediately adjacent to the east side of the historic Muzio's Store. Previously there was a walkway proposed between the two buildings. CHC Review of the Project On March 23, 2009, the CHC reviewed the same revised project plans that are currently before the ARC. The CHC staff report focused discussion on the reuse of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings at the corner of Monterey and Chorro Streets into the project design as well as the appropriateness of the contemporary style of the proposed hotel in its Chinatown Historical District setting. After hearing the testimony of seven public members, the CHC continued the project with direction to provide more information on the extent to which existing buildings would be retained with remodeling, and to revise the design of the hotel to better comply with the Community Design Guidelines and to fit in with its historical district setting (Attachment 4 - 3-23-09 CHC follow-up letter&draft minutes). EVALUATION Each time the project has been revised, its scale and height have been reduced, and many of the issues brought up at the multiple public hearings have been addressed. With the past review of the project before the City Council and at advisory body hearings, much of the public testimony focused on concerns with the loss of the two historic building at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets. The relocation of the hotel component from this corner to the opposite comer of Morro and Palm Streets provided the applicant with more flexibility regarding the retention and reuse of more components of the two historic buildings. With the review of the revised plans, staff suggests that the ARC focus on the following design issues: 1. Architectural Style and Character of the Remodeled Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Buildings Much of the focus of project discussion has been on the disposition of the two historical buildings at the comer of Monterey and Chorro Streets — the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery. The certified Final EIR for the project contains Mitigation Measures MM CR-4 & MM CR-5 requiring the incorporation of building details as well as portions of existing construction into the new construction. With certification of the Final EIR, the Council amended these mitigation measures to require that a more detailed analysis be conducted of the feasibility of reusing specific significant remaining historical building elements in the new project. The applicant hired a consultant to evaluate the feasibility of incorporating remaining character- defining features of the two buildings in the proposed mixed-use project. To maintain objectivity and to assure that the study was complete and consistent with City Council direction, the City hired its own consultant to prepare a peer review of the consultant's report. After the review of these reports by the CHC, the Council reviewed the same reports and concluded that many of the character defining features of the building had been lost through street widening and remodeling over the years, but that at a minimum the proposed project needed to incorporate the salvaged Ah Louis bricks from the Blackstone Hotel and to keep the Sauer Bakery oven in place. With the past review of plans, it was unclear to what degree that building features and materials would be retained as components of the new project design. Beyond the minimum mandates 47H,�-ale ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre...) Mtge h m e i-,i J Page 5 identified by the Council with their review of the historic repots, the applicant is now proposing to incorporate significant portions of the existing facades of both the Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings into the project (see Figure 1 below). The intention is to structurally reinforce and seismically strengthen the URM components of the buildings and to retain significant portions of the facades and other building features with the remodels and seismic upgrades. The interiors would be renovated to have consistent floor levels, and new electrical and mechanical systems would be installed. Figure 1 - Corner view of the]Blackstone &Sauer Bakery Buildings With the seismic retrofit and remodel of the Blackstone, the proposal will be to return the building architecture to the style of the Quintana Building (Figure 2) with the I -- Italian Swiss facade remaining a distinct element along Chorro Street (including the distinctive "porthole 4I l _ `-7 r? windows"). The building would remain at three levels L� with the upper floor stepped back along Chorro Street for the Quintana portion of the street elevation. Portions of the existing brick facades, especially along Chorro Street, F 0 Quintam Building,circa 1904(rigger 1904) - --- -- - - - - - — Figure 2-Quintana Building Photo would be structurally reinforced and - - retained. i - The fagade of the Sauer Building will -- --- be renovated to its original 2-story wood sided look and will have the T• - original 6 window configuration at the second level (See Figure 3). The proposed use of a one-story building adjacent to the existing Sauer building zz- 1 Figure 3-Sauer Bakery ]Building D � l� K Sauer BuMng in the 18805(on file at SLOCHS). ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre�q Attachment 6 Page 6 complements the massing of the two-story Sauer building and will allow for the existing windows of the Sauer Building, that are proposed to be renovated, to be visible and unobstructed by the new one-story building. With the relocation of the hotel component to the opposite corner of the project at the corner of Palm and Morro Streets, it afforded the applicant more flexibility in terms of the reuse of the Sauer and Blackstone buildings. Staff's reaction to the change has been positive in terms of efforts to adaptively reuse the existing building and incorporate facades and other building detailing where feasible. Consistent with the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines, "changes to the outside of a historic building should further promote its original architectural style and character." In acknowledgment that a building may have been modified multiple times in the past; the Guidelines go on to say that "changes to parts of a building that have been modified should usually exhibit the building's original architectural style." As discussed by the CHC on March 23, 2009, additional investigation is needed to fully understand how structural and architectural elements will be preserved. More specific details will return to the CHC and ARC (see Item No. 1 of directional items in the staff recommendation). Once more details are known about the URM upgrade and remodel, a thorough discussion of the project's consistency with applicable historical preservation standards would be provided, including consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings. 2. Contemporary Architectural Style of the Proposed Hotel in the Chinatown Historical District The most significant issue that staff has identified in this staff report is the compatibility of the contemporary architecture of the hotel building in its setting within the Chinatown Historical District and with the architectural character of other buildings on the site. Staff believes that architectural styles with contemporary architectural elements can potentially be compatible in a historical district if they can be found to contribute to its historical character. Although the hotel's design is attractive, staff's initial conclusion is that the proposed hotel building does not achieve the desired architectural compatibility and contribute to the character of the historic district. The following discussion describes the project setting, hotel architecture, previously reviewed building design at the same location, Chinese motifs in the district, the criteria for ARC review of the issue, discussion and analysis of pertinent General Plan policies, and guidelines from the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines and the Community Design Guidelines. Excerpts from the Community Design Guidelines are included to illustrate those design areas which staff believes should be modified to be compatible with its historical context. Setting The Chinatown Historical District is the City's smallest historical district and occupies both sides of Palm Street between Morro and Chorro Streets, as well as one property in the next block to the west, 778 & 798 Palm (Chong's Candy Store). The district contains 12 separate properties. The most significant remaining historic structure in terms of the block's Chinese heritage is the Ah Louis store at the northeast corner of Palm and Chorro. As the photo below from the 1930s ,OK,q ray' ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre.., Page 7 indicates (Figure 4), the block was once dominated by wood-sided, single-story buildings with simple Western storefronts. With the establishment of the Chinatown Historical District, it was not anticipated that new construction would attempt to replicate this look, but that they would be compatible with the scale and architectural style of nearby historic buildings and pay homage in subtle ways to the Chinese heritage of the district. f _r cn 1930sview of Chinatown,north side of Palm Street,showing Shanghai Low neon sign in its original location (on file at San Luis Obispo County Historical Society) Figure 4-1930s Photo of Chinatown (Palm Street) Hotel Architectural Style The proposed building architecture of the hotel - - is contemporary in style - with its flat roofs, sleek wall planes, asymmetrical window detailing, streamlined elevator tower, and - --" central cluster of k glazing for the upper floors facing Palm rL `�11 Street and the central plaza(Figure 5). 1F'iunre 5—Persnp.e.five View of Hotel F..ntry (facing A focal point of the design is a terra cotta screen element which is most prominently used on the Palm Street fagade, but also repeated on the rear corner of the building along Morro Street and facing the internal plaza. The screen is constructed of fired clay terra cotta attached to a metal framework. ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Sm..., Alt g,;,;^ Page 8 Since it occupies such a large extent of a geographically small historical district, it is especially critical that the new building is compatible with its setting and other nearby buildings. The applicant has submitted a written statement of how he feels that the project design achieves this compatibility (Attachment 2). Previous Design With the previous version of the project, the portion of the site where the hotel is now proposed incorporated a building with ground floor retail spaces and residential units on upper floors. The building architecture had more of the traditional "Main Street" style common to downtown San Luis Obispo with regularly spaced storefronts, symmetrical upper floor windows, a stepped back third floor, and some sloped roofs with clay tile. The ARC had recommended that the project incorporate more elements of Chinese architecture into the design of the buildings, especially along Palm Street. The applicant's statement notes that proposed design incorporates Chinese motifs with the terra cotta screen (lantern), the Celadon green color, and the "cracked ice" glazing at the hotel entry. Chinese Motifs 1Fimire 6-Annraved Ah Lnuis Praiect.(farinv Palm Street) The Ah Louis project is the sole example of a recently approved project -41 in the same Chinatown Historical District. There are significant differences between the project and —. ,— �r :u ,u n Ah Louis sites in terms of their scale and relationship to surrounding buildings, but also some parallels. As with the review of the Ah Louis project, theV w L li inevitable discussion in reviewing new building — architecture in this block couma d cnur ` Pr<-oerroo n. PulUng Smumr Ah Louis Srurc Esse is how to incorporate detailing that pays homage to the Chinese heritage of the block without being contrived or artificial. New modern buildings in other historical Chinese districts throughout the state have done this by subtle and elegant detailing that evokes the "essence" of Chinese art and architecture. The approved Ah Louis building addition has some Chinese elements expressed in roof forms and detailing, but these were more subtle than those presented in the original, more overtly Chinese- inspired version of the design (Figure 6). Beyond architectural features of buildings, site details and features can also be used to evoke a desired motif or character. An idea that emerged with earlier review of the project was a possible public art feature with a Chinese theme at one of the paseo entries from Palm Street. -pq -d 30 ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stye, q Page 9 Attachment The Criteria for Review The design of new buildings must be evaluated for consistency with the applicable City policies, ordinances and guidelines. City staff and advisory bodies are NOT charged with determining what "good" design is. Rather they are charged with determining and making recommendations on whether proposed development is consistent with the adopted policies, ordinances and guidelines. There are many design solutions for a given site, some will be consistent with the City's policies and ordinances, and some may not. A "good" design that is not consistent with adopted policies and ordinances will be referred back to the applicant with an explanation of what is inconsistent with the adopted policies and ordinances with the expectation that it will be replaced with another"good" design that is consistent with the City standards. Policies and Ordinances The following paragraphs evaluate the proposed project with applicable General Plan Policies, the Community Design Guidelines and the Historical Preservation Program Guidelines. General Plan Policies • LU 4.12: Building Conservation and Compatibility Architecturally and historically significant buildings should be preserved and restored. New buildings should be compatible with architecturally and historically signifecant buildings, but not necessarily the same style. • Conservation and Open Space Element Policy 3.3.5 In evaluating new public or private development, the City should identify andrp otect neighborhoods or districts having historical character due to the collective effect of Contributing or Master List historic properties. Historical Preservation Program Guidelines • D. 2. New Construction Projects. New primary structures within Historical Preservation Districts should further promote the historic character of those areas. Careful attention to building form, bulk, scale, siting and site landscaping is encouraged. All new buildings need not be designed in the same style of surrounding structures. However, elements of these styles and building forms should be included in the new structure and it should complement the architectural character of the area. Staff's Analvsis: The contemporary architectural style is clearly a different style from nearby historic buildings. The crux of the above policies is whether or not the building as proposed can be found to be compatible with the historical district and contribute to its historical character. Although it is attractively designed, staff's initial conclusion is that the proposed hotel building does not achieve the desired architectural compatibility and historic district character. It does not include architectural elements forms, details or materials that give distinctiveness to contributing historic buildings in the Chinatown or the Downtown Historic Districts. The proposed design contrasts markedly from the pattern, rhythm and architectural character of adjacent and nearby TO `f-r' P ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre, Page 10 AttachMrint 6 historic buildings. Excerpts from the Community Design Guidelines are cited in subsequent sections of this report to build on where staff has identified features of the design that could be modified to make it more compatible. • Conservation and Open Space Element Policy 3.3.4 "..,New buildings in historical districts, or on historically significant sites, should reflect the form, spacinz and materials of nearby historic structures. The street appearance of buildings which contribute to a neighborhood's architectural character should be maintained." Staff's Analysis: As the project has been reduced in scale, its form and massing are more reflective of surrounding development. The building is taller than other historical buildings on Palm and Monterey Streets, but substantially lower in scale than the parking structure at 919 Palm Street. Building materials include a combination of stucco, wood siding and brick, including recycled bricks from buildings to be reconstructed and demolished, which are all in keeping with nearby historic buildings. The most significant issue related to this policy discussed in detail later in this report is the contemporary Palm Street elevation of the hotel and it impacts to the streetscape in terms of architectural guidelines for new development in the downtown including transparency of the ground floor, symmetrical window detailing on the upper levels, and pedestrian scale elements. Community Design Guidelines (Chapter 4- Downtown) ® D®® • 4.2 Design and Development Guidelines Height,scale 0 Q epe ° ° 0®® O ® ;. Multi-story buildings should be set back above the second or third level to maintain a street fagade that is consistent with the historic pattern of development, maintaining the general similarity of building heights at the sidewalk edge. ® 9© Staffs Analysis: A benefit to the previous design for this tRI ®p comer(see Figure 8) is that the building stepped up at the ®®® ° 0 SO SO level which created a nice transition to the intersection ° at Palm and Morro as well as to the main pedestrian paseo at the center of the block. Figure 7—Illustration from Community Design Guidelines showing roof articulation &window detailing. • 4.2 Design and Development Guidelines Height,scale B.4.a. For large projects that occupy several lots, variable roof heights and architectural features that penetrate the roof plane are encouraged to diminish the mass and scale of the taller structure(Figure 7). Staffs Analysis: The previous building design for the comer had more variety in the roof forms of the street elevation that helped to add interest and minimize the building scale when viewed from the street consistent with this guideline (Figure 8). TnD/1 q_ (.5�2, r ' ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Strex,, ArLachrrcnt S Page 11 The currently proposed building would be more compatible in the historic district if it had a greater amount of variation in its roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. o BA.c. Maintain the distinction between the first and upper floors by having a more transparent ground floor. On upper floors, consider using windows or other architectural features that will reinforce the typical rhythm of upper story windows found on traditional commercial buildings and provide architectural interest on all four sides of the building. Staff's Analysis: The previous building design for the comer respected this policy by including a regular pattern of ground floor storefronts creating the desired transparency to this level as well as a symmetrical pattern of upper floor windows (Figure 8). The Palm Street elevation of the current project has a somewhat "top heavy", more opaque appearance. While the motor court at the hotel entry off of Palm Street and the unique programming needs for a hotel create some constraints in keeping that regular rhythm to the ground floor, highlighting public spaces and entries at the ground floor will do much to enhance the desired ground floor openness and transparency. From the conceptual drawings, this appears to be achieved with the restaurant and proposed outdoor dining at the center of the block, but could be improved at other locations. +rte ,{ J rte:f J _ t Ft Rpt F - Slotm'v Sul= + �� .. 1 mS m-H $blx5 r.7yngIC4 - IM FYQk North Eevation-Fatting Palm Street Figure 8 Previous Palm Street Elevation MOM.ill' Y - 'DpeCSN OpN - Al'A ' �6AaiDe.n Ped -� , Sheet •.urL�.• T�.a u,• co@r� -AHL ens cwm T. •r..mw a.se• ema North Elevation-Facing Palm Street SCALE Figure 9—Revised Palm Street Elevation -PH Y-135- A.ti�Ci;1T1�i�l' U ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Strdc� Page 12 A more regular window pattern on the upper floors along with a less extensive use of the terra cotta screen would assist the design in being more consistent with this guideline and provide a more inviting streetscape appearance. From the submitted drawings, the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway could be benefit from being better articulated and heralded. • B.4.f. Use roof overhangs, cornices, dentals, moldings, awnings, and other decorative features to decrease the vertical appearance of the walls. Staff's Analysis: In keeping with the contemporary architecture of the hotel, wall articulation is spare and minimal. However,the hotel use does lend itself to including balconies for upper floor rooms. With other suggested modifications to plans in terms of more variation in roof planes and symmetrical window detailing on upper floors, there may be increased opportunities to add balconies and other similar projecting features. 3. Muzio's Store,868 Monterey Street—East building elevation In the previous design, Muzio's Store was separated from the adjacent building to the north by a pedestrian walkway. In the revised design, a new building immediately abuts Muzio's Store, hiding the painted ` brick and metal fire door on the Store's east elevation. The west building elevation would remain visible, since a pedestrian _. walkway is planned along this side of the building. This would not be the first time the side of Figure 10—Historic Muzio's Store: northeast the Muzio's building was covered. The 1926 Sanborn Map shows Muzio's Store with buildings immediately adjacent on both sides. While this changes the way Muzio's store has been seen for decades, the approach is consistent with the building's historic spatial relationship within the block. The rear, second story porch shown in the 1926 Sanborn Map, should be preserved to show the building's original residential/commercial use. This approach is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards regarding preservation of a historic building's setting. 4. Site Planning One of the prior comments from the ARC was that good light levels should be maintained in plaza areas to assure that they are places that people will enjoy lingering in. The reduction in the heights of project buildings with revisions to plans will produce less severe shading impacts. With the next review of plans by the ARC, the applicant will have a physical model available as well as computer 3-D imaging to help better evaluate site components and their relationship to existing and proposed buildings and topographical changes. With the final approval of plans, the ARC will be looking at two site related plans that are Transportation mitigation measures. These are the sidewalk management plan and a ?NY- (3 ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stre,,,) i Page 13 Alt3Cl;t`C ent 6 plaza/walkway management plan. The goal of the sidewalk management plan is to provide for optimal pedestrian flow on the adjacent City sidewalks to the project by maintaining a minimum of 8 feet clear of street furniture and other obstructions. The plaza/walkway management plan has a similar goal of maintaining at least 10 feet clear on the pedestrian walkways through the site. The plan would include text about planned uses and activities and a site plan detailing the locations of amenities like seating, fountains, and public art. Conclusion The revised project in terms of its scale and mix of land uses creates an attractive and viable design that addresses many of the concerns and issues brought up during earlier public hearings on the project. Staff has identified the contemporary design of the new hotel building in the Chinatown Historical District as the main historical district compatibility issue with the current project. Staff is gratified to see that more significant portions of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be retained with development of the project and looks forward to more information on those details being submitted with revised plans for final review. RECOMMENDATION Continue the project to a date uncertain with the following directional items to be addressed in revised plans that return to the ARC: 1. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify the architectural response in terms of applicable historical standards. 2. Incorporate building colors,roof features,file work, and railings in the hotel building to play on Chinese art and motifs. 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historical District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. c. Minimize the sizel of the terra cotta screen facing Palm Street. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway. e. Increase the amount of upper floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. 5. Provide the architectural model of the project block and buildings across the street consistent with Mitigation Measure MM VIS-2 along with the ARC's final review of the project design. ARC 69-05 (861 Palm Stream-)' ` Attachment 6 Page 14 6. Submit more refined versions of the sidewalk management and plaza/walkway management plans. Attachments: Attachment 1: Vicinity Map — preYlov&ly a 9v ched Attachment 2: Applicant's Historic Policy Design Response Attachment 3: Reduced Project Plans —ava i fable- 4rvr revi-eyv in proez_( le j not a{}i tchM Attachment 4: 3-23-09 CHC follow-up letter&draft minutes V Attachment 5: 11-19-07 ARC follow-up letter&minutes Included in ARC's packets; 11' x 17' project plans including color perspectives, elevations, and a site& landscaping plan L:Chinatown\Staff reportsWRC 69-05(30-09 conceptual review of revised project) Attachment 6 A R C Attachment 2 Chinatown Project LU 4.12: Building Conservation and Compatibility • Architecturally and historically significant buildings should be preserved and restored. New buildings should be compatible with architecturally and historically siknnifrcant buildings, but not necessarily the same. 1. Significant buildings are being preserved. —The Muzio Building was always proposed to remain and be strengthened, and we have now also proposed that the Blackstone Hotel and the Sauer Buildings be reincorporated into the project, seismically strengthened, and renovated to the extent feasible. Historic studies completed for the project identified few remaining intact features of historical significance with respect to the Blackstone and Sauer buildings; however there still remains a strong community support for retaining these historic buildings where possible. Because of the relocation of the hotel to Palm Street, we now have a greater degree of flexibility with how these buildings are treated. Based on this we have proposed to renovate and reuse as much of the existing buildings as can be reasonably achieved. Building structures will be tied together,but the number of stories remains the same. The Blackstone and Italian Swiss buildings will stay at three stories. Their facades will be refinished to return to the architectural style of the former `Quintana Building'. The fagade of the Sauer Building will be renovated to its original 2-story wood sided look and will have the original 6 window configuration at the second level. Floors will be strengthened and leveled to provide for accessibility and new uses, and new building electrical and mechanical systems will be provided with the renovation. 2. New buildings are compatible,while not necessarily the same, and use a variety of styles - Downtown SLO is characterized by a variety of architectural style while not showing any one dominant type. 3. New buildings are compatible through use of materials—(stucco, plaster, brick, tile, wrought iron, horizontal siding), and have a great deal of articulation,massing variety, vertical and horizontal articulation. • Conservation and Open Space Element Policy 33.4 New buildings should reflect the form and spacing, and materials of nearby historic structures. 1. Nearby historic structures show use of plaster,tile, and brick. Similar materials are used in the proposed new buildings. Attachment 6 • Implemented design changes—the following additional design changes have been incorporated into the project based on early discussions with Planning. 1. Revised cornice detailing at hotel building—The hotel cornice has been stepped back at the fagade along Morro and Palm Streets to provide additional detail and interest. This similar type of stepped back cornice can be found on other buildings downtown, including the new 919 Palm street city building. 2. Incorporated horizontal board siding into fagades at hotel—Horizontal siding has been incorporated into portions of the facades of the hotel, to provide additional relief and textured elements and detail. This type of treatment is used in many downtown buildings including the Sauer Adobe along Chorro Street. It is also proposed for the renovation of the Sauer Bakery Building at Monterey Street as part of the project. 3. Incorporated additional terra cotta lattice screen at the Morro Street fagade and the Plaza fagade of the hotel -A terra cotta screen/lattice which is comprised of fired clay terracotta attached to a metal support framework is utilized in the hotel building to provide a graceful screen element and interesting fagade treatment. The use of terra cotta has a long history associated with the Chinese and can be found used in a variety of ways in Chinese architecture. Screens are also used widely throughout Chinese architecture to soften views and provide transition between indoors and outdoor space. The proposed use of the terra cotta lattice is a reference to these points, and has been expanded to include other facades of the hotel. 4. Brick fagade treatments, utilizing salvaged Ah Louis bricks, at Morro and Palm Street facades of hotel—Ah Louis, who played a large role in the founding of the original Chinatown area of the San Luis Obispo, was known among other things for his manufacturing of brick. During demolition of the buildings proposed to be demolished, for example the former Shanghai building at Palm Street, adjacent to the Palm Theatre, and the city offices at 955 Morro Street,brick will be salvaged. It is likely that this brick may have been manufactured by Ah Louis. This brick is proposed to be reused and incorporated into some of the facades of the hotel, and additional brick fagade areas have been proposed for the hotel. It is also proposed to be used in wall caps and planter areas for decorative trim. 5. Added sloped wood trellis at hotel above walkway area/plaza stairs—A sloped trellis which provides a sun screen element and has similar quality as the screens and lattices used throughout the hotel has been incorporated over the stair areas at the Plaza side of the hotel to signify the entry to and from the hotel courtyard area. 6. Glazing at street level fagade of hotel building along Palm Street—Additional glazing has been proposed at the entry fagade, to further promote a `transparent' and inviting feeling to the hotel lobby. 7. `Cracked Ice' patterned glazing added at entrance of hotel—A `cracked ice' pattern which is inspired by Chinese design motifs is proposed to be used at the hotel entry lobby areas to provide a unique and visually exciting element.. PRY-13;' Attachment 6 Community Design Guidelines 4.2 Design and Development Guidelines B. Height, scale 1. The height and scale of new structures are designed to complement existing adjacent buildings and provide human scale and proportion. o Street front open dining areas—A dining area at the hotel restaurant along Palm Street, adjacent to the Palm Theatre, is proposed with operable screens which will allow for outside street side dining and will reinforce the pedestrian connection. o Doors and entries at pedestrian street level—Located frequently throughout the project, doors and entries are used to allow for a strong connection between interior and exterior spaces,to allow for easy flow and access through the various uses proposed within the project, and to portray an inviting and friendly space oriented toward pedestrian use. o Trellis and landscape features—Landscape proposed in the project will be varied and carefully selected to provide color,texture, and to soften hardscape and buildings. o One, two, and three story buildings—Buildings are of varied heights and numbers of stories as is typical of the downtown. o Varied setbacks from street fronts—Open space and plaza areas, including a motor court, are provided which offer open areas for light and views into and out of the project. The variation in setback provides a visually interesting street front and complements the existing adjacent buildings. The building proposed adjacent to the Feliciano building at Monterey Street has been setback 10' at the second level to address earlier concerns with that buildings existing property line windows and now allows for ample light and separation. The proposed use of a one story building adjacent to the existing Sauer building complements the massing of the 2- story Sauer building and will allow for the existing windows of the Sauer which are proposed to be renovated to be visible and unobstructed by the new one story building. o Varied facades and fagade treatments/articulation—The use of many different colors and materials, and a variety of architectural styles and detailing maintains a varied project feel and scale and reinforces the feel and character of downtown which is comprised of multiple styles of architecture, not any one dominant type. C. Fagade design. New structures provide storefront windows at pedestrian level, doors, entries, and transom windows, awnings, and a variety of cornice treatments. Architectural features complement existing structures without copying their styles PP (4) A tachment 6 o Design utilizes a variety of stylistic;treatments from `Main Street' to `Chinese Inspired'. A courtyard used in the hotel is a signature Chinese design element. o Colors and materials are chosen to be complimentary to surrounding existing structures. Warm tones and soft, varied textures are pleasant and provide human scale and a comfortable quality. o Cornice treatments include projecting cornices, articulated cornices with dentils, stepped back cornices, and simple streamline motifs. These are all types of details which can be found in the downtown. The use of a varied palette of styles reinforces the `multiple buildings' concept of the project. Historical Preservation Program Guidelines 2. D.2.New Construction.Projects New structures are carefully designed to further promote the historic character of the area. Careful attention has been paid to overall building forms,bulk, scale, and siting of buildings. New buildings are not designed to copy or mimic the same style of the surrounding buildings; however elements of the surrounding buildings' styles can be found in the form and character of the new buildings. These include design elements which can be found in surrounding buildings such as o Historic Character—The most significant character of the area is that buildings are varied and uniquely styled with no dominant style. This has been carried out in the project by using a `multiple building' concept. The project is designed to appear as a group of several buildings with each having its own unique character and quality. o Horizontal parapets—Horizontal parapets with varied detailing, step backs, cornices, etc. and variation in the horizontal line are commonly used downtown and in the project. o Sloped roofs- Sloped roofs are also used in a variety of ways. A sloped roof with clay tile is proposed at the new building `C' to reduce its apparent massing and provide an interesting roof form. A sloped roof with false front is utilized at the Sauer Building, as it currently exists and is proposed to be renovated. o Vertical and horizontal window articulation—Both found in the downtown and used in the project. o Use of painted cement plaster;brick, and horizontal siding—Typical materials found in the area. o Wrought iron—railings and ornamental work proposed. o Plaster mouldings, o Ceramic tile details—brick veneer detailing, and tilework will provide interest and fine detail at the human scale. -PRY ice Attachment 6 TEAK- Sub►nI -ed @ 3 -.2 3 -09- C4 C o Local Architects,. �Y Raw 50 h o Brand +Allen—Hospitality Experts o Feng Shui Consultant o Historian o Colorist o Restaurant Consultant and Operator-5 Star Michelin o Hotel Operator—Successful Boutique, Conde Naste top rated o Spa Consultant o Landscape Architect • PRESENTATION OF PROJECT— There are two basic components of the presentation. • MONTEREY STREET RETAIL • MONTEREY HISTORIC - The new design allows for the re-establishment of Monterey Street's historic position as a main retail commercial block. A more pedestrian oriented layout along Monterey Street and a better retail presence is now possible due to the elimination of the driveway at Monterey Street. • PEDESTRIAN PLAZA AND LINK- The elimination of the vehicular entry at Monterey Street resolves the pedestrian conflict with vehicles along Historic Monterey Street. This was a primary concern raised by both planning and public works throughout the review process. We have now incorporated a pedestrian plaza area to accommodate outside seating in this area at Monterey Street. • HISTORIC - ADAPTIVE REUSE - Historic studies completed for the project identified few remaining intact features of historical significance with respect to the Blackstone and Sauer buildings; however, there still remains a strong community support for retaining these historic buildings where possible. Because of the relocation of the hotel to Palm Street, we now have a greater degree of flexibility with how these buildings are treated. Based on this we have proposed to renovate and reuse as much of the existing buildings as can be reasonably achieved. Building structures will be tied together, but the number of stories is proposed to remain the same. The Blackstone and Italian Swiss buildings are proposed to remain at three stories. Their facades will be refinished to return to the architectural style of the former `Quintana Block' Building. The facade of the Sauer Building will be renovated to its original 2-story wood sided look and will have the original 6 window configuration at the second level. Floors will be strengthened and leveled to provide for accessibility and new uses, and new building electrical and mechanical systems will be provided with the renovation. • ARCHITECTURAL STYLES - Building architectural styles are varied and utilize a wide variety of materials, including salvage Ah Louis brick, cement plaster, horizontal board siding, ornamental metal railings, ceramic tile in a variety of colors and patterns, clay tile terra cotta, wood lattice work, and clay tile roofs. The use of many different colors,, Attachment 6 and materials, and a variety of architectural styles and detailing maintains a vaned project feel and scale and reinforces the feel and character of downtown which is comprised of multiple styles of architecture, not any one dominant type. • BUILDING MASSING AND HEIGHTS - One, two, and three story buildings are proposed with vaned setbacks from street fronts— Open space and plaza areas, including the motor court at Palm Street, are provided which offer open areas for light and views into and out of the project. The variations in setback provide a visually interesting street front and complement the existing adjacent buildings. The building proposed adjacent to the Feliciano building at Monterey Street has been setback 10' at the second level to address earlier concerns with that buildings existing property line windows and now allows for ample light and separation. The proposed use of a one story building adjacent to the existing Sauer building complements the massing of the 2-story Sauer building and will allow for the existing windows of the Sauer which are proposed to be renovated to be visible and unobstructed by the new one story building. • HOTEL • MOTOR COURT -The hotel at Palm Street now includes a vehicular drop off/motor court to allow hotel patrons to be received at the hotel. This addresses an issue raised in the previous design review where there was concern about the arrival of guests and loading/unloading. • ROOM COUNT-The hotel is now able to accommodate a larger number of rooms - approximately 85 rooms as currently proposed- which has a much better fiscal /TOT benefit to the City. The 85 room layout is proposed in a 3 story configuration. • SITE DESIGN - The hotel has a larger site area which will allow for a better utilization of outside amenities. This will better serve the proposed uses including the ability to accommodate meetings, conferences, wedding parties, and gatherings. The hotel is oriented around a landscaped central courtyard, which flows out onto the central pedestrian walks and plaza area. • RESTAURANT - A restaurant proposed as part of the hotel is located at Palm Street, adjacent to the Palm Theatre and includes al fresco dining along the sidewalk frontage. This will help enliven Palm Street and provide an exciting addition to this area of the !_ Palm Street block. • LOUNGE- A hotel lounge located at the corner of Palm and Morro streets will enliven this corner and provide an exciting use at this location of the block. A multi level spa proposed as part of the hotel has been at the lower end of Morro Street providing an active, pedestrian oriented use along Morro Street. • SPA—A spa located along Morro Street at the eastern end of the site will create a retail front and pedestrian friendly use along the sidewalk street frontage. Attachment 6 Hotel San Luis Obispo- Chinatown—Chinese Historic District - - • CHINESE DESIGN PRINCIPALS - Our design approach identifies ancient Chinese architecture and planning principals and carefully weaves them into a hotel design which will further promote the historic character of the area. Traditional Feng-Shui design guidelines were also researched and incorporated. We have strived to thoughtfully introduce Chinese design influences that are true and respectful of traditional Chinese culture while avoiding cliched mimicry of Chinese style. • THE CHINESE HOUSE - For centuries the architecture of the Chinese house has used exterior and interior courtyards as organizing elements. Traditionally this plan organization uses a main gate, an outer courtyard and a larger inner courtyard. The main gate is never on axis with the entry door. Entrances that are open and that occur near the center of a building create balance and promote benevolent energy. • HOTEL ENTRANCE SENSE OF PLACE - The area of the project site dedicated to the Hotel is located at the corner of Palm and Morro Streets, and faces two large parking garages; the Palm Street garage and the City Offices /Garage. To create a visually pleasing focal point at the hotel entrance elevation. a balanced elevation incorporating elements of the surrounding buildings styles' has been utilized to help identify the hotel entrance and creates a sense of place. The hotel entrance has been pulled back from the street to create an outer courtyard which serves as the arrival plaza and will allow for guests and vehicular arrival. • HOTEL FLOOR PLAN HIERARCHY -The floor plan of the hotel has been arranged to further this hierarchy. The outer courtyard, entry gate, and inner courtyard hierarchy have been utilized to shape the hotel and to break down its mass. This approach creates a variety of spaces for the hotel grounds. It takes advantage of the wonderful climate of San Luis Obispo and allows for an indoor/outdoor feel to the Hotel. Guided by Feng-Shui design principals, this arrangement allows for benevolent energy to flow freely throughout the space and captures the positive energy of natural light. • WATER WALL - Adjacent to the entry doors is a 3 story water wall and art feature. Incorporating a traditional Chinese glazing pattern referred to as "cracked ice", a vertical maze is created that allows the water to trickle down into a quiet pool of water. According to Chinese custom, the sound of the dripping water and its placement near the entrance is another feng-shui principal that creates benevolent energy. The cracked ice pattern, a pattern of nature revered by the Chinese, symbolizes the transition from winter to spring which_ celebrates the rebirth we experience each year in life. • TERRA COTTA AND HORSES OF QIN DYNASTY- Above the main entry doors is a screen made of fired clay terra cotta. Chinese architecture has a long history of using screens to diffuse light and views, create sense of privacy, and to create shading patterns. The terra cotta is used because it is one of the most common materials in Chinese culture. It has been used for centuries as common roof tiles, has been molded and fired into everything from the daily teapot to exquisite glazed ceramic vases, and has been used in Chinese art for centuries; the most famous being the magnificent terra cotta soldiers and horses of the Qin Dynasty. Attachment 6 • TERRA COTTA SCREEN LANTERN The terra cotta screen diffuses the upper levels - over the entry, creates a light dappled wall for the outer courtyard, and provides sun shading for the late westerly sun. The terra cotta is a warm natural material that compliments the Ah Louis brick that is being used. In the evening the terra cotta screen becomes a soft glowing lantern revealing the back-lit surface behind it. Lanterns are used in Chinese architecture to mark entrances. • SALVAGED BRICK - Original brick salvaged from the site, which presumably may have been manufactured in Ah Louis' brick works, is re-used to create brick screen walls on the comers of each building to define the street entrances of the restaurant and the hotel bar/breakfast room. Recycling this brick pays tribute to the Chinese history of San Luis Obispo brick making and establishes a link to the historic brick buildings in the downtown area. • MAIN GATE - A main gate to the inner courtyard and the pedestrian walk beyond has been created by separating the building into two. The gate is symbolically formed by two vertical elements pierced by a bridge that connects the buildings on the upper levels. This gate allows one to pass from the entry courtyard to the larger interior courtyard without having to enter the building. This reduces the mass and scale of the elevation and invites pedestrians to wander and explore the premises by walking. Steps leading from the inner courtyard to the mid block pedestrian walk allow an easy walking transition to downtown shops, restaurants and businesses via the Monterey Street continuation of the pedestrian walk. By creating a visual axis through the hotel grounds pedestrians feel a friendly welcoming experience and a mid block through walkway is established. •. COLORS -Colors for the exterior walls have been chosen to be warm and complimentary to adjacent buildings in the historic district. The color and material scheme has been influenced by the five ancient essential elements of life—water, fine, wood,metal and earth; as well as the 1000 year history of using celadon green glazing on Chinese pottery. Celadon green has been used as the main color for the hotel exterior. It is symbolic for vitality, longevity, harmony and vigor. A deep earthen brown has been used to compliment the celadon green. Natural wood colors are utilized to provide accents. • SUMMARY - In Summary, The Hotel San Luis Obispo will contribute to the Chinese Historical District by respecting and interpreting these Chinese cultural traditions. It will extend the commercial downtown area by creating a strong sense of place. It will provide a link between the civic buildings and the downtown commercial core. The design is open, warm, and complimentary to the historical buildings that add to the charm of the downtown district. It will create a destination that is unique, and further contributes to the historic district. J?N �'« Attachment 6 ILARc-Attachment 4 1►ill�lllllllllllllllllll��►�� II�IIIIIIIIIII II� a _Of SAn lU- IS OBISPO Community Development Department• 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 March 27, 2009 SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 1085 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 SUBJECT: ARC 69-05: 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870, & 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street - Conceptual review of revised design for the Chinatown Project Gentlemen: The Cultural Heritage Committee, at its meeting of March 23, 2009, continued consideration of the project to a date uncertain with the following direction: 1. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify the architectural response in terms of the Secretary of the Interior Standards. 2. Incorporate building colors, roof features, tile work, and railings in the hotel building to play on Chinese art and motifs. 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historical District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. c. Minimize the size of the terra cotta screen facing Palm Street. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway. e. Increase the amount of upper floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. 1 / OThe City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. ARC 69-05 (Chinatown Project) CHC Committee Meeting AttaChrnent 6 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Pam Ricci at 781-7168. Sincerely, W/ oum Kim Murry Deputy Community Development Director Long-Range Planning cc: County of SLO Assessor's Office Mark Rawson, AIA SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 12260 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 DRAFT Attachment 6 SAN LUIS OBISPO CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 23, 2009 The meeting convened at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street. ROLL CALL: Present: Committee Members, Katy Davis, Lynne Landwehr, Dean Miller, Acting Vice- Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler(one seat vacant) Absent: Barbara Breska Staff: Deputy Community Development Director Kim Murry, Senior Planner Pam Ricci, Senior Planner Jeff Hook, and Recording Secretary Janet Miller ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as presented. PUBLIC COMMENT: Uta Birkmayer, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the cultural heritage of the area.. She noted that cultural heritage should be thought of as more than just the buildings that the Committee considers at meetings. It is also derived from people, culture, and spirit of a place. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the cultural heritage of the Downtown. He agreed with Ms. Birkmayer's comments history is more than just buildings — it includes people and events. There were no further comments from the public. Chairperson Fowler, Committee members and staff thanked Lynne Landwehr for her service on the Cultural Heritage Committee: MINUTES: Minutes of February 23, 2009 were approved as amended. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:. I. 955 Morro Street, 840, 842, 844,848,868, 870,-& 886 Monterey Street, 847, 861, 863, & 877 Palm Street, and 984 & 986 Chorro Street. ARC 69-05; Conceptual review of revised design for the Chinatown Project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown, LLC, Applicants. (Pam Ricci) Pam Ricci, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, recommending to continue the project and provide the following direction: (1) Provide additional information regarding how portions of the existing Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings will be retained and used in the remodeled structures; and (2) Modify the design of the proposed hotel at the comer of Palm and Morro .pNq' Draft CHC Minutes s March 23,2009 Attac h m P nt 6 Page 2 Streets to improve its compatibility with the Chinatown Historical District, based on findings and subject to conditions which were outlined in the staff report. Committee members requested clarification on the scale of the buildings and on the structural fagade items that will be retained on both the Blackstone and Sauer buildings. Ms. Ricci replied that detail would be provided in future discussions. Tonight's architectural plans were intended to show project changes and general architectural treatment, and the applicant and staff were looking for Committee direction to refine plans. Mark Rawson, Architect for the project, spoke in support of the design and project development. Chris Harleson, applicant representative, spoke in support of the project design. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Allan Cooper, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project. He felt that the proposed Blackstone Hotel redevelopment was likely to be a reconstruction rather than an "adaptive re- use" project, since very little of the original building could be reused. He felt the porthole windows were not consistent with the proposed architectural design of the Blackstone Hotel building and did not need to be incorporated into the proposed design. He supported staff's recommendation to modify the hotel design, including more variation in the hotel's roof heights. Bob Vessely, San Luis Obispo, supported the retention of more of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Buildings, as proposed, but believed the current proposal would ultimately be a reconstruction, not rehabilitation. He would like to see how the applicant proposes to re-use the Ah Louis bricks and how public accessibility to the preserved-in-place Sauer ovens will be accomplished. He further stated that he supported the redesign of the site and the contemporary design of the hotel. William Watson, San Luis Obispo, supported the project, including the applicant's efforts to preserve more portions of historic buildings and the contemporary architecture of the hotel. He noted support for both the hotel and the applicant's sensitivity to the project. Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, supported the project but stated it was a reconstruction project. She noted her concern over public accessibility to the Sauer Bakery oven. Joseph Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, agreed with prior public speakers. Mr. Abrahams would like to see the project be more child-friendly. He requested that the retail history of the buildings that had been a part of the old parking area be included in the project. Vangeli Evangelopoulos, San Luis Obispo, spoke in support of the project, but was concerned about the overall "feel" and usability of the Monterey Street pedestrian plaza. He recommended a more prominent entry be provided to lead pedestrians to the hotel and plaza. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the slide showing the approved Ah Louis mixed-use project and its height above the historic Ah Louis Store. He felt that higher buildings are not part of the quality of the architecture of San Luis Obispo. Pgq,14g Draft CHC Minutes March 23,2009 Attachment 6 Page 3 s Mark Rawson, Architect for the project, noted that the project was considered adaptive re-use, not reconstruction as defined in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings. He stated that the Sauer ovens would be preserved in place and would be available for the public to view. There were no further public comments. COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Committee Member Landwehr requested that the design of the Blackstone Hotel be consistent with a specific point in its history. She felt the portholes would be inconsistent with design period the architect has selected. She would like to see the design period consistently addressed in the design of the Blackstone building. She expressed her support for the general direction of the project design. Vice Chair Crotser asked how the architect weighed project decisions in the context of City General Plan goals and Community Design Guidelines. Mr. Rawson responded that the project had been reshaped through the EIR, public input and advisory body direction. Committee Member Davis noted that the new design responds to direction from prior meetings and expressed support for the revised project. Committee Member Miller suggested that the applicant work with adjacent property owners for a better flow of pedestrian walkways. Chairperson Fowler supported the progression of the project. He looked forward to seeing the project in the next phase. He supported the architect's relocation of the hotel to the Palm Street side of the site. Vice-Chairperson Crotser noted the project seemed to be a reinterpretation of an earlier style, rather than a true "reconstruction" of the Quintana Building and Sauer Bakery Building. He suggested exploring the "re-interpretation" the Blackstone and Sauer buildings since there may not be enough integrity in remaining in the buildings to rehabilitate them. He presented a modification to the staff report to include wording under recommended condition #1 to clarify the architectural response in terms of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. There were no further comments made from the Committee. On a motion by Vice Chair Crotser, seconded by Committee Member Davis, the Committee voted to recommend the continuation of the project based on the direction outlined in the staff report, with a change to Item#1, as follows: 1. Expand on how the reuse of building features and portions of building walls of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings will be accomplished. Clarify the architectural response in terms of the Secretary of the Interior Standards. 2. Incorporate building colors,roof features,the work,and railings in the hotel building to play on Chinese art and motifs. PH q- ILI^ Draft CHC Minutes - - -- March 23,2009 Page Attachment 6 3. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 4. Modify the architectural detailing of the hotel to be more compatible with its setting in the Chinatown Historical District by incorporation of the following items: a. Provide a greater amount of variation in roof height and more articulation at the roof/wall juncture. b. Include a more regular window pattern on the upper floors. c. Minimize the size of the terra cotta screen facing Palm Street. d. Further articulate and highlight the entries to the hotel from Palm Street and the central walkway. e. Increase the amount of upper floor balconies and other projections to the Palm Street elevation. AYES: Committee Members Katy Davis, Lynne Landwehr, Dean Miller, Acting Vice- Chair Chuck Crotser, and Acting Chairperson John Fowler NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: Committee Member Barbara Breska, Vacant Position The motion passed on a 5:0 vote. COMMUNICATIONS: A. Agenda Forecast — Staff provided a brief preview of upcoming agenda items, including the swearing in of new Committee members and election of officers. a. Committee - The Committee discussed the upcoming Mayor's Advisory Body lunch on April 9`h. Katy Davis volunteered to attend on behalf of the Committee. b. Member Landwehr thanked the members, staff and public for helping to make her experience on the Committee such an enjoyable one. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted by, Janet Miller Recording Secretary T' 4 T' �� Attachrnont 6 �G Attachment 5 ui111�18111�NI��N��1�111111111111 .6 i Cl Of SAn ktttowspo Community Development Department•919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401-3218 December 3, 2007 SLO Chinatown, LLC PO Box 1085 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 SUBJECT: ARC 69-05: 861 Palm Street Review of Chinatown Mixed-Use Project Dear Applicant: The Architectural Review Commission, at its meeting of November 19, 2007, continued action on your project to a date uncertain, with the following direction on design issues and additional information required for final review of the overall project design. 1. Provide the architectural model of the project block and buildings across the street consistent with Mitigation Measure MM VIS-2 along with the ARC's final review of the project design. 2. Submit more refined versions of the sidewalk management and plaza/walkway management plans. 3. The ARC noted their preference for the proposed mid-block paseo design versus the idea of a diagonal paseo. 4. Provide ideas for creative public art proposals to be incorporated into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. 5. Expand on how the reuse of uncovered building features and/or the reuse of portions of building walls in the project may be feasible. 6. Provide detailed plans on how oven reconstruction would be accomplished, including the rebuilt oven's integration with surrounding project features and signage to provide historic documentation. 7. Correct all pages of project plans to reflect the revised proposals including the landscaping plan. The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to include the disabled in all of its services, programs and activities. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf(805)781-7410. ARC 69-05 Attachment 6 Page 2 8. Provide more ground level shots of the project as shown in the 3-D digital model to clarify project details with the submittal of final, plans. 9. Encourage cooperation with the owner of the adjacent Feliciano Building to look at potential solutions regarding the loss of property line windows such as the installation of skylights. 10. Provide a written description of solid waste services for all proposed uses in the project along with an accompanying pictorial exhibit. Plans should clarify where both short-term and long-term storage will be in buildings .and how trucks will access the site via the Morro Street service driveway. If you have questions, please contact Pam Ricci at (805) 781-7168. Sincerely, lJ . !GU Pamela Ricci, AICP Senior Planner cc: County of SLO Assessor's Office Mark Rawson, AIA PO Box 1085 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-1085 PH L1-15c;L ARC Minutes November 19, 2007 Page 2 Aftachment 6 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission supported the revised design as it protects the sensitive site features and the overall building height was lower. Commr. Root wanted clarification regarding how the removable bollards added to Meadow Street at Lawrence Drive would work, and asked about the concrete roof material. On motion by Commr. Howard to grant final approval of the new house design, based on findings, and subject to conditions and code requirements. Seconded by Commr. Wilhelm. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Howard, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Palazzo, Kambitsis NOES: None RECUSED: None ABSENT: None The motion passed on a 7:0 vote. 2. 861, 840, 842, 844, 848, 868, 870 & 886 Monterey Street, 984 & 986 Chorro Street, 847, 863 & 877 Palm and 955 Morro Street. ARC 69-05; Review of Chinatown mixed-use project; C-D-H zone; SLO Chinatown LLC, applicant. (Continued from November 5, 2007) (Pam Ricci) Commr. Howard recused herself because of a potential conflict of interest. Senior Planner Pam Ricci presented the staff report, recommending continuance of the project to a date uncertain with direction on design issues and identification of additional information required for final review of the overall project design. She described the key elements of the revised, reduced-scale project and noted changes made in response to previous ARC comments and direction. She noted that the Cultural Heritage Committee had continued their discussion regarding the disposition of the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings to November 26, 2007, but that they had supported demolition of Bello's, Shanghai Low and 955 Morro, and were generally supportive of the mass and scale of the revised plans in the context of the historical district setting. Mark Rawson, project architect and applicant's representative, presented a 3D visual model and gave a detailed presentation of the revised project plans. Principal Transportation Planner Peggy Mandeville answered questions about walkways within the project and how they interacted with pedestrian movements onto adjacent City sidewalks. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Alex Gough, San Luis Obispo, indicated his concern with the demolition of the historic TffY 62 ARC Minutes November 19,2007 Attachment 6 Page 3 • buildings on the site and felt that adaptive reuse of the buildings was important. He felt that retention of the Sauer Bakery building was essential and questioned how the ovens could be reused in the project effectively because of their large size. He supported the lower height of project buildings and more public open space in the site design. Elizabeth Abrahams, San Luis Obispo, agreed with Alex Gough's comments and noted that the Sauer Bakery ovens should be creatively used in the project. David Brodie, San Luis Obispo, disliked the pitched tile roofs shown on some project buildings, finding them overused in current architecture. He questioned how accurately the 3-D video depicted the scale of the streets and voiced concerns with the viability of the proposed retail uses, servicing buildings (trash and deliveries), the appearance of the rooftop pool, and the Monterey Street stairwells. He suggested that the project incorporate an escalator from Monterey Street to the upper plaza area. Craig Smith, San Luis Obispo, expressed concern with the blocking of the windows on the second floor of the adjacent Feliciano Building with project development and noted that skylights may be a viable option. Peter Danciart, San Luis Obispo, complimented the architects on their complex plaza design and suggested that the building architecture should respect the current time and place of construction and that replication of Chinese architecture here was not appropriate. He noted that the design should take advantage of views, and that uses established in the center of the site should be ones that draw people in via the stairwells, rather than hotel meeting rooms and a spa. There were no further comments from the public. COMMISSION COMMENTS: The Commission used the discussion points included in the staff report to guide their discussion of project components and issues. Some of the key points covered were: • The ARC's preference for the proposed central paseo design from Palm Street as opposed to an alternative diagonal paseo that linked the interior of the site with the intersection of Palm and Morro Streets; • The architecture of the hotel was discussed, but no consensus was reached on preferred building styles until after further input from the EIR hearings regarding the disposition of the Sauer Bakery and Blackstone Hotel buildings; • The ARC was generally pleased with the applicant's plan for solid waste access and servicing, but wanted further details to return to them; • The preference was for a subtle approach to incorporating a Chinese motif into the architecture and design details of the Palm portion of the project; ��y=1st ARC Minutes ATTACHMENT � November 19,2007 Page 4 • The ARC encouraged cooperation with the owner of the adjacent Feliciano Building to look at potential solutions regarding the loss of property line windows such as the installation of skylights; and • The ARC supported the incorporation of creative public art proposals into project plans that build on the project's Chinatown theme. Commr. Hopkins suggested that the project incorporate a range of sizes of residential units. Commr. Boudreau felt the main focus for the ARC should be the mass of the buildings, and circulation including pedestrian access. He noted that design details would be important to see when the project returned for final review. He felt that there were solutions to the issue with blocking the property line windows of the Feliciano Building (Bladerunner and Full Circle) such as the skylight idea. He liked the brick veneer on the building adjacent to Muzio's and thought that the project could benefit by maximizing ground floor openings. Commr. Wilhelm mentioned that the corner buildings opposite the Mission should have more window opening details. He suggested that the entrance to the project off of Palm Street make a statement, including the possibility of incorporating a Chinese motif. Commr. Root liked the proposed staircases in the project off of Monterey Street;wanted to see more information return on solid waste service for the project, and thought it would be a nice feature to have the rebuilt Sauer Bakery ovens be operational. Commr. Kambitsis also liked the proposed stairwells and felt that it was important to have more active uses in the center of the project. On a motion by Commr. Root to continue the project to a date uncertain with additional information required for final review. Seconded by Commr. Hopkins. AYES: Commrs. Wilhelm, Root, Boudreau, Hopkins, Palazzo, and Kambitsis NOES: None RECUSED: Commr. Howard ABSENT: None The motion carried on a 6:0 vote 3. Staff A. Agenda Forecast Pam Ricci gave an agenda forecast of upcoming projects. 4. Commission: A. Minutes of November 5, 2007 -FNy- est Attachment 7 Trash and Recycling - Solid Waste Management Plan. Chinatown Project • A Central Trash and Recycling Room is located in the project where the primary bins will be located. Within this room there will be both trash bins and recycling bins for sorting of recyclables. This trash/recyling room is located at the lowest level of the project and is accessed via the drive alley off of Morro Street. o Trash pick up by the local garbage company will take place at this central location in early morning hours, and the on site project maintenance staff will coordinate and be responsible for the removal of the bins from the trash room for unloading by the garbage company and placing the bins back immediately after pick up. This is the same method currently being used at the Court Street Center. • Secondary trash/recyling rooms are located in each of the major buildings as follows: 1. One is located at the lowest level of the hotel, adjacent to the parking and restaurant back of house areas. 2. One is located in Building B, to serve the residential units in that building, adjacent to the ground floor lobby. 3. One is located in Building C, to serve the residential units in that building, adjacent to the plaza level corridor 4. These `secondary trash room' are for resident and hotel convenience. The trash and recyclables within these rooms will be transferred to the central trash room location by on site maintenance staff on a daily basis. • Retail tenants will have local trash storage containers located within the back room areas of each retail lease space. These containers will be used to hold daily trash and recyclables, which are also transferred as needed daily to the central trash room by onsite staff. • Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final detailed plan of the trash and recycling rooms, including number and type of bins, and adequate capacity for the different solid waste and recyclables shall be submitted to the City's solid waste coordinator and the local garbage company for final review and approval. This plan shall also identify areas for storage of fats, oils and grease, and any other waste expected to be generated by restaurant(s) or other types of tenants within the project. Tpq -�� Attachment 7 Trash and Recycling - Solid Waste Management Plan. Chinatown Project Phasing Plan for Trash/Recycling • If, as has been contemplated, the project is constructed in phases, with Building B and D being completed prior to the completion of the Hotel -Building A, and the Retail/Residential - Building C, the central trash room will not be complete after this early phase, since it is located in the area of Building C and A. • Under this scenario,the retail tenants in the project will maintain trash within the retail spaces. Trash will still be moved on a daily basis by on site maintenance staff to the curbside at Monterey Street for early pickup. All bins or wheelers will be replaced into the respective storage areas after pickup by onsite staff, and no bins or wheelers may be left on the street or sidewalk after pickup. • The secondary trash room in building B will be complete and the residential occupants will still have access to this `secondary' trash room in Building B. 4214 L/- L47?' Fxhlbltt� Attachment 8 — 4.0 REyl IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES u c v s n' u c O V •-,� cus u 2Jo a. as u ¢ Q,4 Es L � � � b0� y ti.•O �^ C Sc � 2LL. O > 7 F n w •N � c � 0 3 c o U C y K,O O m 'Eu o •2 O is p w L z Ctu E c 'c n ocn c .E ,o ° E v ° e4 •o a � Q 'y N R:+ .. 3 a E OG F a U 0o+ °�L L d o � m •= L c 3 o OD s s o d y °' > `? c s ° y-0 E r c u LZ s > uc c s a c > 5 u 4Q CDy �.� [zcl •aui � o L x c s 0 > •o n = u u °o ° n tlu ++ c a 3 a L 00 0 00 o aooicc E .0 c L c ° ° o ° $ m °' E o ° c c o n °� 9 aO a d C o to r- E •° E cm y 'd ti mco —:cac:i uH > :.0. .3. ec i •� N sai Edti aai o00. cE rn��ya _:? n — tRad - Uld E — G m s o a > o o E E 0 u N 0 d U c3 E o Z Eri U ou ❑ EQ nEU . c ° o > EO i a U 'C c — .� x 7 N O z n c o '� .c " E c ° o. a s a o u m o n U .o o o n G z F .E N c 3 m o u Oa p 6 rNs 3 3 0-,On v ° ti v E 3 3 a`o s v .� c " ° c a =' o O .� y � � c � na. �° •� Ey yup .. Ob cR � •R _ O > y yi Q N L d•.-- fS00:s .�. E — ° N ° y .E E •v •- y L u a Y o •� v a d R o = y = C t t On a ayi ' ° ro E C ° u o w° u Q y o o Q F 000sA .E T� Z LV ra ° O 7 y 0 C y 0 CD ar h❑ c U ti U C/� •° ° o tQ z CO E o s Q .+ 3 'C ti F R Qo a N a -5 F . .ri Q a c m 0 Chinatown Project 42 Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 /�(� Attachment 8 4.0 REYISI 4PACT SUMMARY TABLES O CC t F , +p+ E ate+ 7 bpA '9 y W1 � is C p C EU N N Nca > m O R s O y� •C N Lz w O 'O V t CI Cg ca C G. y w > yy p tE c y d ..+ l� N Q N y •y '� ld 61 N F-, U C 0.0 a3yo wW,AA0z m Vd Q N Ryo O wo E Q > (u -= o ty . r - y aUy>, 0. a . oO fN E t7-C Uo p O O � - A N Vc V Q 0 y = w CL oor S3ag ° .0 $ c ° : M r- -°0. ° ds N3: U o o o a u Eo c 0. cp c 0. 0U rE O o a) > Q '- U IL) $c a� y >1d °_) E curio o N c EE •pCw'.C\j :Vfd7n.i',.:... 0CN rU yC .cy°'.. o > 3 z L w = o o o a wLH7 wo o >0 0 0. N Uo en > ctiE U co M. CC ` OON0. C ed b p w • y C ^ = U ca O C : cO m d . 0 uO R D O A � g LPvm O > N mON C V � Y p a C- CaUOV� 7 n .y $ C o v d Q oQ � wr v0sa E Cd m n Eo,> x o — E > U, o i Aa) 94 0. Q M ) ' Cd C W _ 0 V v rl � y W •7 a F � d £„ N �. cn Chinatown Project 4-3 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 -- Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUP RY TABLES C Ix s F m 6 DD 7 QJ a_ 10 R ao C CO L Q\ ` y d p C •O N ea W °' cz Q 3v° i 3 c > .: c 2 o a3i c c e y o o . o ° ts = =' H Z cc 0 �, = Q -- c d s aai o` c .y F a°i ccr _ - U m .= n y > c m c o o y � .c o y � R O E o ` v'� w ami o s Q o 00 d 4° Z cci � EQc � � y � a a' c v mrn � 02v aci' sn ?� > � y � > a y a T s y cc m E _CC L Q � _U. „•, Q'.V OOA c N 0 _ U > > _c to U > yoGzU T O y CO) o C C ' N CE E b w cc 7 y yy cV_ O O C cC O•d Q O� R C O '7 O C C ..+ 'C => '-' •gyp t .�. N L N ayi o c c c ac eR w y ° -0= :: o > Y E ° as " `2 -6v o o o � W c V m . o R c E ' O v ;? t4 c.� U O ,0 •y `° w- d o d Rs r o ° E °� Y .. c y y 3 •% t m aci U = 0 a o M ° p � s e 0 `t: t W C o = a, ot. e o 0 0 o d ._ y y => c r R w O 0 -6 O at my w0pvL cy C y .- N 0 0 p, ICO C O w 'K vRi o 0 o0'E c c y y n y d "m _ ro o c c c c _ o c s m p o 3 o E c u. c y Dc E — Q 6 °° U � t o o R W W c c u y c CJ o a R o ° ° E : o eA - 0 y R c w o •^ Z L_ C O E_ q O '.t: G.'y v, t�; a) O Ir o 0 31,., E coo e_ ^ a o 3 �° •= 3 > F 0. 3 s o Q y 3 > o c e y °q C O °= : ao 0 p0 o E C c o m c m = Q C1 E c [j ¢ V OA c 's "" z .0 ... = v o c c w N cs �� ct y U y O II ti ° s a �. 0 •C a °' V a " cs a fl O 0 °°•- D o y = v w v C = ° L 0 p, os � aUp�, ,, s o Q o Q o Q � o-" Q Q 3 v E EC C 0. a U o c r c o c c Z aw C rr u y � Vj = 6i � � C e u° ,1w V VJ W � CO r L_ � Q Q F ^= N .. M 44 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 FP q✓ Icy Attachment 8 4.0 REVISE iPACT SUMMARY TABLES v = edQ U c Q o d > a U U '- � y •E 0 o � UT Eo : EO wy � oy o � IZ 04W E 3 p O a w ►! O 'UcC R cC y C10 y a Q a''-yQ3dE Y a c o ° r - T s _ � -pN — t N 00 fa U ce O c -0 C. y' 0 __ C t = y ° y y u ° m ° m ° 0 3 a aci c m c CQ = 00 m hU 9 a > c n y x = n r- cui "' c W °' 3 ° � ° cgus3ozAr gv : °�' 3 c� � a� R � 00 r- r°nE c $ s $ s yCL s o o n .� u, y o SEL ° o c Duo n ° c c a ¢°� F y c n c a� .G c c d c n p 000 W r- m SEV2"S. 'vnny .°uR .rco • T3J 'Ovy iv •ymayO� ;EE no U •i�0 WyU >° c E oco = co Qo S c8 •I 0 E cc •a O V l = Q _ : . '0E o 0 o . EeoCU bf r- E-a 0 CJ ~ �•' C. 7 �" G"►�+C0.:C>O-.^'2 w.4. aye0> =zW>33N0c0'0°cxNm00 w4U:v> d.ayy�cy�. m oyyUws¢ sray •�'ohoamy c3 cay 4UVu .c co3 EE3 Uo wr- yu sr= t2 -,4 ' OU w O Cr O _° LFY = UU O U G. 0 E oAo ° = cc m ° = oc U ° 0 my>C E c L Q y UQ (31 tw4>°o v -0 o 'yst . E J3y . 0U ° Oy L >, p° U 0 3o CO 0. 0 U ECJ = U : o ° ° F Cs c pa O 7 O. y . cC'c c o o s c o f >> en o 0 cu E UNN O '0 d Qy O A a.02a>i cc 0. . LNcdOUv E ccqu 'Ew � y Q E 0 c U U U� Q a 0 N ? f"2 cE 5 y a=Ei ca CL W) O > a CC 04 C) 0 CJ t4 3 Z 7 N U a t � 1 C C W1 d w c V2 C C �� O V CA O c c o >, C .r O 0. C ry " E E u upU -o 00. s o w . O d 3 a� Eo ,ay ,�O, � 3 R c U L F at Q M ° p '� x A U U Eri < n. Q Chinatown Project 4-5 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 ' 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUP RY TABLES Attachment 8 ° u u A C O 79 z > > >> CC E °' E = u o F o a � ws c rCY � r o .-m is sc D W 80-E 4. y w cE u •.- u o o E o u Q a yCY b a -6 y E R = O .rd A a .e E O ate+ y b ca (.�aO�O+">" �w�>o �L3_ •F=0o.oy3C�7 _ 0 ORcaycn � E > c .E 0. u o� ccsy5oc z u It or == X=yatO o°NEu ° u E a Ca > o E 56E 0-adoE co > o s Eu° ° Ea m>00 o .00cu ° ao ° dEE � 0C\ c _F+e�C+. a •y cyao c oo� t E E ons O •�Eb ?= c v U d kQa gEyo E C1 r cz cE uo -14 � u o cE E u msE OO Ey Q WNCa > c u Cd 0 oo cc = E Cd � dR 01.— R. ° C6 LJ N 77 N w O �• .O C O ° C'. = O =O 'O O d W 7 F, .4? O «: C D. C y N E ° � � ` E O oU u � � -T ` � 3 E y c �•> E p•.c? vi C O i A O C .R =O O N — .R d 0 d O 'O C C �O y' p O U v aU " o. 8 'uo 'a'o ys £ E R u c = o `" c = sQ o "" E E o = u > 2 A " o t u o di E,U C1 ° R o c oo 3 s u 'VCL's 'fl _ m � .cWa .E ° � gC3o x°° � � cocs „ £ Uyc ncs c �O y=° p yu° ' o C F c .C, 3 s E .E 3 _ O .� y Q C 2 E- �+ A = N U w-[7 O '� y C!) C w •p L Cil 'b cry C.>>. ¢.E E cry > y oA � O L is.0 7J. .T+ N O p o N y .a u d o a`i ° 0. a h d•. 3 o a.y c Q O Q. a. N R .o._ E Cy _ U Q E ° r FO Cu •V1 t1°n r Eon o° E s -s to a c o c .Sv � rA m a e ~ V rip y R 0 u H v W � CO y L rn M 4-6 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 ply-l6a Attachment 8 4.0 REVISE IPACT SUMMARY TABLES C e0 S F m W 0 y: •° E a� m a a _ o c o ELS o` d sQ ctn O'D o E on � o �Tov c u o � a� y � s u E as W �w ° 0E r_ n' cp c E EO E ) E ;o ° c E U nm s0 � z � ° U7 ' da eon. Eboc =E 3 �y o ._ U > c ' e aoaymt c 3E ' :g E EE . roocu E 2 .y: ca z p n. o a E a. _� o7;5 y S y p y" c0 r0 0. p y ..U. w y v 3 > U "" :D lI] 'fl w .8 .0 00 10 G eoy- 3 LE7n m = •U cV . N CYNfV O V yE zEsv ; ° Fo kn E c Wi•' ey 8$ Oy sN 0 EG _ C V 3 N N ON U _ C CO E E W Od >;0 .2 ,, ba U r oH a� z� o a v cy o ❑ >csd � o o0� o > u ° _00 O > 0tdw mtw mcideu 00 c t E u au c E > U s 6 m op 3CO A W O 3 3 . .� 0, F u a E d .5 . C93 wE o .4 � °c (j 'y � w a: W -uo 3C y n 0 N E c E � 3 o -- a c d o u °� s 'fl o y o 3 'fl ° u "7 n .5 m n (x p c o u a y ._ 2 s c _ p o u N ° � •E ,Evo o $ c a"i E E d d m ` ' a M M .E a 's 3 s & a°i c °� s :E y m d.E a o .v d E E c O A d d w d $ 3 u n '? d o 'y E 3 u C Q o c m � � n o 0 0 o f d u Q � Q u Q � c,: a� 'r„ yc Quo r- , 3 c R. 0» f1, ^3 0 = m L y C '>. c U aci o n. � y E " u U v� 0 W a F � Q N .r RS Chinatown Project 4-7 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 �l b 4.0 REVISED IWACrSUI_ Ry TABLES Attachment 8 c E ccs c ° a > s o �s o c c y as c o E -E °°E 'o o Ec > a H ooi V Z3 .0 >Rccs p .3 L s y° 'v r L O N �' y C •o K .>'. U 'y 'v N t 2.M 3 w a •O mAs = c �s c 0. sco U o 0 o E - 03 > ca > r- 0 3.r3uE M a F E� o S 0 o � R E Uac ° s s o = o E `° coUB aso -c =E ° >o o u i " cca C = Cc c a .0 . o - 0m .c R n E � °>E 'Fb > 2 CO c1 m o 0 .- 0 o.r) .` 0 `oaUo Uc ? cvj x 72ati c °' a 3 E > a a'� � 9 M-5 E E c axi v a ° O ocn E d o 2 N s c y N o ° o s L o o > ° c 3 o c ro a s v s F a c a o eo r � > c � c .n ce ` C y s d .3 R L ` a o E Q o _� g 0 U X 3 0 >_ o :? > GC s° > y W 00 > 0. r. M a`di •c °nt c EU � Z = � d o y ° Z c °. e ca U > d � 3 0U y � yzA o o p ° y u W c Cc,-._ o _ o ° ° d Z W e '3 O e d . o o a ca "0 c a ac1i ,E y .E a V .3 ca Id •p E to N N N L C ° C .0 ca V V y ° .�. N y w N O .E d s u a� � •� a s°o ` Er o E E '0 o E y d � o a0 F ° d ca y .o c ° ° E `- E� >' ag d U ° A o c d R. 3 3 m E �1 •• cc My ca � � > d a oty Y y c E R o a. . E ami c ep n o, aci c c E 00. r. 5 =�s �3y �3t ° > cyoc cU c ` ° y aUcc " =_Nm O0- 0 " N n 0Ad0 EEamcn `'y o >0 y ed O O '7C ° = c u A C ° y E E eD E B • o sy - Er •EU ° cE0dc a > ou E Uo °_ y.E ' > 2 E o ° > ZE ca E C N0 ca E�yu ��O'Q+\ y U•C G•°_L •'oE • E • .•C:. E7 •� V + UV.•y� ycs ° = yNLO ^ C E N y O z ° E O 'OO C E ` G tC 0 0 LMC0 > E .=RL. Eu 2 Epy NdUU _VM ' E R y2VO V tiEs.p > s d M 'O 2 U U E N N � .fl R C > N y bo e3 fl d= � y CC .5 y C N •"� U b .OPC cVa y C d O ° y 7 C °u o o c 3 0 .. y CL o O T 4) =3 W �a _ F c o y o V y C C . > F Ca � N M M U °u -0 O d 48 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Attachment 8 4.0 REVISE TACT SUMMARY TABLES aci O z c c 6 c � .� v c a v = No' ooa't = a c � o rs U - a on CC a on U �- y N m s y U o ° o o 1 . .y .a E 'HY9 y c o E ter '-' > 0 0 vs o N o y N ° e 0 ° aNiE0. msycyi °' Oai as (X PC 'a N v eQ .� d U 'L.. 00 U O 'y C t O C 3 • r c o 3 F O O °� � .E � c u .E ;O.b > c c — 2 ° a ao N .. w ca ' y ° o E oa . .°p•: c L°• 3 c •° N ° 0000 W °.° 00 �?. 3 N �a R o H d N > c^ t as N OL E •• � to C > O o U c N — C c o 3 y E w v E v �_ i oyn d h L E .E o > . R y y o ZO ° �� o Ep � o CO _ NacE � � �- N " c°� m4 ys ° .5 II. E .— t L 'a UU 0 .E h N U O m L Y t 00 a y w G 00 y 5 O ° V p O t `o - n 3s o � E °e �x Vis .` c '� °� � .o °��' c F � iz y U ; y .- .0 Pte. � = .� L E y .E a b .00 _° •a Q°Q ° o c CC 'C N C O y p CO L JD y 0 C. O\ N E 0 7 0 is t1r y to O .D m .--I C .fl ca ct "moEa . E .= v �a >+ � oR ioo N °' Bou c ' y : a N o 0 3 oor 00 .:'a 00 y (l L o A t t t JD c Q .°°'E A y 0 Ju a=c N w y .c N F o o Y o a U o w y a N o U d �.� ° o N . 3 t •a y m N �o �a :: d o ° d N c .a •� y 'a E >+ O .�+ y y .�° 00 U L �,,, U .� N O I.N. _ Lp y u � -O r0 >'r �N. ao cE o > > tc � ° >= r c,- !o �.. R a y o d m y ° e s = R w n d r- 0 s c 07 ` = N ` ON ` .r y yO .D w ° IS. C. C '� C y 4. O 6 'a r y . w .�'+ =i y •-� C c V] N bD aA y O . = UU O v O V) .� y U •U. y O a O C: c i O 14 E ° c .D c .N y I.N. r1 'R N �_ V C 00-0 E N 9 N 'v s U E R U O ,� S fl,n0+ y E L y �O C R 0Ca 0 E •a p N 1 M ° 00 O U O N w v O .NC N D cC= N N O G c c 3 _ c Q °O a W c o 0 G t F cs o ca w U w w U p _ v Q mQ m y 0. W Q200 y 00 a: C y GC 04y N ca 9 N . c 3 E c°s n q a°i S `a `o 0 ca Uv] CO > o O O y a o 00'a ° w U v Oa 7 F u g a V E L C w0 E 9 V y� pp N N I � ay � Nh ri U -E 6 ?? Chinatown Project 4-9 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUI_ Ry TABLES Vl ••' ep U C v U .II N A <~ c U _ t: M c ,O 3 w cs w .N E is w w cC eu � is 4� 3 O T Q c E F" U y M � c £ a E A ° oo " ai M M .+ E a>i - o d EEg OC .. . — u a w o c a cs y c e fz, o f c 3 0 c E d ou � y U H .°� >, c ° 3 Es o 'o o y ° o ° E _ a' c bs ° 0 0 0 `o c y c y y E d y 3 c c o •y o Ea oo rn c c 'C .Bv� y U 0'0 E 6 y > o u 3 y ° t L' as eD O a) V c p ...� .0 0 " t:.•i y C = V y V t O E C o v E o o .g h 0. M y M U a C o w° v 0 oo a� c E y > o Z U o y c = a 7 u c c 0 o Q •c y •° C a°� c c d 3 E QU R E rx > y 0 •E '8 R .R M m o E � 3 ° ER > y o o `o c � AU �-' is u R ° •` ess o `o wL. 'C es y V C a) •.. ':. :° m °�° ° :: 7 3 Si v R O a) �.. A U '� R O y y .0+ 4„ eu a •E eu y y y tt3col � o _ v U . u c ,, ° c es *V y .E R o o e L C y 0 LZ Cay a N R 4�. G L W v t.+ 'O 3 Y a) U .0 p C v c C C .0 00 0.= •= ° v o o = a c d > ca R 3 Y S m w s �s m c `o Cz Oa .E U N Vy >> c = -+ y v m 09 R S Y 0 .2 q A° 0 3 rn.14 t vi 3 0 � � A .� a a c w s '0 y O O y - o y ` .R E o _ ° :? C ` y a� co p E ami (aj w o E o CC E s y a co c v 0 R ami N U ecu c m 3 ry r w n Q ? a o r CU o m t m •v w u 3 c a� t o o •y 'o _ 4. 0 eo ° m ^� L x c y o A s .E o •- —m au c s d .oua 3 s — yr c - o s c s c 00R a� U E • � °' > m A = MCZ — F ai a o L F y w 3 E r F O F = > —% � .0 0 0 L y U o m C °' EacicA � � E03 X8cE55 cD d sacCn c -3 � = > a W �c� � a ^ — o s 3 m = ai y E m ° > •- c o c U y E 1 h - o ' _ U c u y s y u s u y ° v u y c e4 ti 0 •° m c c o m O..p M L E O y C 1 M1 '9 O R t i a) r O E 'O c ,N cC N U 'R v C CQ 0 �° amici U c u EU y U c y .= sw U � U .0 0 U � ° n e d E 7 ?A p 9 c .. y O — >. O U 7 y V �... �. O O U N .:+ y U A U U •y y y .. d i3., 'fl A. E •v �o A �a W s s o 6. ^O F 5 -5 p o aci @? U r 'c o 3 wo m n a � y y v h U O .r 3x o � a C r' C O C 3 .° ~■ u e 3 s c o rn6: o v U 3 WD = v 0 y O N _ A n Uv] u .00 t) y OJ V r O O CL a.E v E y w L L U y 3 ee F _u Q y .c � cs — �r en ei I UxA ° 4-10 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 f)J (q _�� Attachment 8 1 4.0 REYISI APACT SummARY TABLES C s U o s E a> c E ccd os N °°= v m E c 'D H •` V (n y 'O 'O _. E � 7 7 � O ti •O q c c r ro 5 a ti y E 'p a> w. C E > y "O _ _ u a> c E ° y ° ° py . .4 u E x c = .= c o x E o U p N E y c a> E rU > > a c E, c cai .p 'w � ac°i m E 7 y a`°i o v •o'� p > c > c g .p p y > fl o cc . a> 3axi c �^ E . 'c ° g 2 ° .ccoe E 7, yc �= ed _ o > °o .+ ; ?$ y � U ° E o y .^ E � w � .E E = dvV w a pr Z = � 'E —° 30 00 `-' E73yuE o0 oiso Er 3 c U � E Q c c E w E w a 3 > 2 °' c .o a3i ° sp ° 3a>> ro = 3E no •° o " u —> p_ QE LEsN ° ey N ecn? U _ a c U oU y o aLi o U aa � E ° � d � .� E — o E `m y m °> ° ti = °> E g o � p o i> 3 U •s . � 3 > u � d = ° � � od E oo = �no0E � c � U s o o` a o t w E > o d s c °c ° O > c ° CO Co s y U t C y L Y w. R d U C C 3 ° N X 'UD c7 y O U aCQ = R w �Vj c N t :� N w O 0 _0 T C 7 V N O O V C = O y V v ea >'-0 to R 'fl p �-• ,D' c V C N y v = G N C E w U N d a? 'C C y >. O C 'fl i s ..' O O E 'C p V 3 d C O O �O ° c h Cr O C y E q p c E fu ' 4 sE o N c ° °v , . 0 cE V o E CL ° e� ° � e ai w cs " w p y c m t0 o 'Ees ODcU `� " tga °�' p - 'd 3 «>— v 'Ono ° ooh a> ° ° H as > c E 0 7 Cd pc A o ° d •o c y ° c u R EL b 3 U = — E U m 3 c c d .a c w A `° v °c i° o •c. `m y O `�,, :� E > s C N O-.D is i O E •,: R. ca C is 4 s .n c C h d `� E E oo p : 5 O a c> co = >, O a O c U o x1 E uc o f c a"i a>> c o 0 0 o y o R c g c g E D C. O U N �. z 5 �. .U. Nzr v, N 7 rz rn 0 is ca to 'O U o U U N c U 'G y O 4++ c. '� N �F�++, •�' Q G • 1G 7 A U O A U d G °U v G c'Oa �...-1 f/5 • • CJ U O CO V m N A .N O O.y 3 RU ° z O to O3 O C p U y o c a> p p U DUA N r V 0 a t: c a - H �> � E9 a o :? o m . o s° Ca v U z2 • N Or -S F E r� oo O 'o >E L aci .9 Chinatown Project 4-11 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REvisED IMPAcr SuA RY TABLES Alta r h m 2 nt 8 _ 0 s F a S s Q ao y yy� W L C C O pp Imo.. E R C Cy y N O.', � y C C O •�= C o u d 'oen x3o yo .E E •fl x U C �' C 0 7 L C y d es > p O U R N 0 d > Z °c' E 0 I N, pi! � y o � � � u y E �- 3 y E :: o U 'x E aai a °c E .0 3 0 > R � o > H F d e > y_ oL o IQ, U p p L > 3 o z o u u y U y o y m E S o n N6� O� Q L (/� y pC •"-1 y . Uo U C O oaac U C 0 L Z = p p .2 UO O O ai p ca H m :_ y yo c . ' s > to pta°jy R y o3n � � o u o 0 .E m m c L u - u L _naw u _ o c t $ L U = 2 U L = n c ° d t c F c d C o a E F .E C S0 Egb L = -coo o CNC.. .D y ar-. K C .ti y '°_ R. r 0> Wi u = `x a s a d c Z ° ycc �° y Z 5 .c n.E oa E o ° auA W y � a 14 C i C/� e W u v � y Z " 'O � z A 00 ri 4-12 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 Attachment 8 4.0 R ED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES � N t N N o Eo 7 5'.2 .N. y 0 .. w E oaf 0 0 3 E N o u EsR9 > 3 w C 0 N ul c t_ .E c c ♦.I � V U t7 R � L Op t0 0 ° c on a,E oq m C fl vbaN n c .E N n- 0 C t R z ?? L A �, a E33yL 3oc,,_or O Lp. cCN .0 = pr" �0ai. ,mU wp 03 O ° CtCd "-' L•D°nq °yC fl t Q = 0O --yC� .4 'DV ) t0p = we y >V > 3 Q 0 v c > o "� g v s o > • o — � o u a rL -n ' N >_ a� 3 c o m 0 ti M d Q ° o > N y s v r $ N es N C d E a = ;? a°i 3 0 ao.0 y c O ° G R,L -Qi v C N R G N �, �- 'O 0 - G X .- E ` U C V 0 ,r O w L M y •� y N y ri R V t 00 w0 cJ 0 0 y 0 V �y Op .V y t - ° CLC: V _ O C- y •� � E ° m � 0 .. cd L N 0 R U O C C t7 s .D t n. E •= i :: a� •.+ F EZ to 0.O0 E `� ovE.� > a � :_ U o $ aciaU ;; °� E N G o f aai m c =Esd °� a>i 0 o .cc a m •3 .y .E y v E e p r It r- m cn E o rn 3 t z �w p N C y q "J' N >1 'p m .�-i .e"- �"' QO.UU+ rN„ y w y N L: E Q y E ; a>iUa �' c � .Es > ai ys E. Mo N �Ij CU3 u E _ E R e4 y a i on oV3 3 m a c s r. o o •> E o 0 on r y U O U _ •• a V C U U V5U E .- � U ' .�° g O .w.E N S OU N N N R a. esrULs :D CL O M U C 0 w N of) u E- ? t N E^ T 0. E U y n n n ._ C Q NC U N1 C 3 U O tiN y p . h V: > a. :� 3 > n. > m Chinatown Project 4-13 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 T)N L( 4.0 REVISED IMPACrS,_.NInRYTABLES Attachment b = O 3 � 3 c c = aV u � U o < Uw .0 .� X = w c a V O L O L CS o o L: E 4 E fl a) U a) U m m - x E E E E ^ N rL' > p y m •a`3 a p pidO. > ba0 O L. •� ._ m .. U y c d w N > O O N — O• C U O .E O .� E• o y d o y .5 my E g o o Ep o S y 3 '3 ° •- � 3 v •a y Q O '� U O O U y y C U m 00 m E 5 0 Es a ° m c c U o = " c — o 0 � u� � o c , 7 p 3 ° E .4 0 E a s OB P y s s cU 13o h w -0 U .� t .� 'a 5 .+ u .9 c $ •= W `° csi 3 `o a m c » ° d "m 33 °d E ° y — E E 0 ��y c W `_ 'y° °o d c° _ � 'V c% 4 t E N = .0 = ea 'O p y U y y L. O a T O Cn w LQ U m t T .O NO > H U y y m .fl 'O _ " 7 y �. 0 d a) > p V O �, m c O. v a) U b0 a) 0 ip U N R •p p Vtav on o 0c m 5 � _u � � n >ooC � oc L 7 = q to > O cc 0 a) z ° y a) O op L C .0 y E y .ti .fl O E E rn �. L U 'O C•� Op E y ° p m .D ` o c � E a= yo y 0 a .Y a o =° c o o aai > c U 3 °�°aTi H V > h'E u 3 u v a>i ° 9 ,o C ._ .E y _ t v . to= 00 13 0 _= N n. 8.n. o o E . 3 'o .3 0 •y c m o _ 'm.0 C o y R C] E = cEJ c ami a� o no ° ?«_ -� % m y t o o c d c o m v m d o c U .8 d °� 0 3 d ° o m o a w > _ :? o c° v E U o tpy, — O p6' ° CES ° ° H ° ° UcyE �S .°_m-°r •E ° � oc _ U g ¢ s y U U o U C m U ° ° y o i y to u r a) m m rn 'C • • • • • • F m 'O w E m C/] c y 00 n. z h1° .� O > y U m `� �_ m O O O O C E U O d U K aai ami 3 0.2 U o s w ° ° E '> y ° Lv U R p ep°s E v o 'CZ o r 0`4 a`o N 7 = y 5 C.) c O •U U a ° ca y ay o W m n o C m a) E a y c y ° E :3 F ' � p ; � .N c u c y Q Q N y y V .� C O a) L 7 C^ O�N O 60 �n E ri Q n.u` U vi U 'ti Q o ti 4-14 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Attachment 8 . 4.0 F. SED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 'O C G O y 6> r� Ed X riri � � N C ._ O >> C cef p y h c d m n cm 'E �.r ° ° a ` CU EL 0 V) o � a 93 co= uE y n o � .=3 ci s OU u , Cd " aVi _ s Cd s W OBD 00 r- oa.: E >,.Ey ° = a� d .c o 00 � r odca"io3.m ' o � R = o � A > EF" co t T E a'� v o o o o > C JD 0 E ri n i y m R o o � UIw o :fl vi O :E E. x •C 4•" E N N �. > y V 6 O.• Y N V ;? s 4 � .E y y .E � � o c � '> ° '3 � L V ° s4° ° Up H y '✓ cv y N 7 0 m O •y C O p, ° O "d "� V i0 L — 3 'U Ocu tz p N 6 E oD yLy o .N oo o o o ca vys bu - E ° — d Cl _ ° = c > > of c c a> c N o a t i_ V d c c=s > E " a� m J t O O .p T '!7 O w C •L d' V T T A p Q� iC N� C C E O y o c c o = d a V o x ] d y > ctl R �' T 4. . bo IC�r�i y`!�°o-,•i >O syV.., LC ,mV= 'fl 'OG' V LN L rCw°..7t3 a R> O UO> cCR t R L0 eN0 c � 4 M .0 . S eO 0E C S . ab ; -6EUaa °_ o v ° c UsM cE . 8 o � j V o ndm '2 �'GIIvi+oE NcC i C3 E v OW e E � C y V U1 v U 67 0 F, is U M r f7 Chinatown Project 4-15 Final E!R Addendum—September 2009 I' Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT'S._�RV TABLES d V 7 E N G> > N N v U c m � � v � y o V N > EC E v v Si U O t B t C _ O U w 3 . > N T ° p y o 'i ' d .2 Z e E 3 c a te ° � y .° o � .0 .-1 OMQ. ° "m ?_ ci A �°'cEoa� � a� � � c°> °_' � `a `7raci oc°, c O ao � $ cum � E ° . Wr-W—? c acic ° 020 ccU c° ais F c N UU 4'. a E e "0 to Q.a ,N O E -. b ° Ur. a N N N m C O U B .E.. O 'h p 'U• 7 7 +�+ d 3 0 o .O c y 3 .E y ° > c 3 a Tv = U °� oo v aai - g > E E o A •m ❑ c •� c _ p w L _° 3 -C C ca C api O Q u 7 s 0 0 caw y ` ` R �. oq ZU .•fin = O a .> N C C e0 N .y '� L U �C - CNu ° > CCy U CM °M 'n o .5 r. o ue ? oEd) c ' cT ° y° E cE U avv ° dc0 'c E o w cc oyE9a3. y C o 0 -o o oca � p ._ c > 'O N Ey .— Q. U L °3 .cT`u3. �dsoNto'.i� vj aEu: pc O3 daU acC 'cC •sEcJ C N ' a E 3p 0 ° O ZX oU EU F ° d YN -° >3 O L>r <E 0tz p °Ei E o ai cO cs Q Cd7 G OC E Ny Es cE >, U 7 3 a '� O w 0D N y!;. N O M — u " 0 0 dq 2 O O > T _ O C N N w i. c > u p 3 c o v ami t U a s s d L N :° L ° n a e cr ea p a a O U u E .-o u a > d U u ro o t t r '� u y E p u 0.5 : E U c z E E s c R a o v Q M x ¢y Z ° n .= iG N e+iU O w 0 C* Q 3 U b y y 2 .2 0 ; C. � •C L z 3 p 0 O U C O t Vj O V1 aUi 'p 4. DA vi Qa V N a E d �+ = co0 u 0 W L °c co.on x o 0 F >1d o y o 0 M C 7 ,N c3W - ,0 4-16 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 t � Attachment 8 4.0 1 3ED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES w. U � 3 7 R - ❑ > — .D p O w e v 3 0 > to > > > 3 v > g x 7 o v o c C 37 R x u ° w = 00 C L R V a d C N > O C o a R > ca y O R: w w a t v w y ° t 'y v O W �U+ '-c v 3 v� ^U E E c°i V o C�7+ 0 c c t a� sF E o c E ' E 8 6l U O y O y O 0.L O .0 m U 0 N Y .�. O O C .E a s v c Nw° w y > c°- U ~ r R. r- y U •b0 O 0 C y ee C our ° -y O b U p 0 pL n. a a s z COt 3 C a o ° n c :? 9 n CG EE E Q ° 0 Em � :E 9 :E c ` y R en o 3 ie wy.'fl V o vi O W 0 E 7 v� c cG ° 'o = •� ' y o a`3 Oa y Ee sct p t oai R c' .,v •c- vi .= r to R°' Uy :oo UoUc o Y m R o n�° . to ° > c ° `o s G U > U E dU ,ao:octEE � � oayi � uoo � c E � ,c o f •� o 0 — M C O s y L y .. U OD S. ee y 7 y �. O s .- c>e w 0 = 0 R C C O C 00.- a o y 0 0 0 0 .R w s. y O Vt V r y C = as U 0c r- p s C:. 3s .°p � .o EF p .Eem cuF 0 0 > 0 c.0. CL y^ Nco E0.4 a.+ t00 U .� U O .� C G ed = O y C ie = .G 'fl U <e C� cz ed v �• m .0 r s C y y y R d O v .0 0 w a ... ,O 0..0 ,0 Z s p 3 c •Y 3 oLe) s 3 o v C — y s s ou 33 s > ° � tp ° oo r R v > ayo oo - � ° 'o : u0 F" d w F aEi ayi Y _ y o S9 Q c c c� = ca ° Q CQ 0 ° L C 0 LY.. y y U 'O U m O. c0 0 O R Ob O ¢ n' C O y F 'O d rw b O o-.i m •- O C O U o0 ee U .-..,-. ,..., y O .+ "e c 3 ° U 0 c URo EoR � � v ° O ` E g °° g 0 0 >. a 6 — a n i 3 > CL _ 0 s 0 a� W m c W ` d°? •-, COD E n y CO) v R u E 3 y 3 E ¢ ce a GA v7 s y �e s C%� c � w .0 0 � C. .+ C p '� o U y �. G y ao d v 0o E v 7 C U y 7 y R OU U - w Q v 0 d a o E ° Y c CW p u o s� E ° c. ou.43 u o y R e o R u r R . z a.0 s - V d 0 .Os4 R5 O '° yL y E. ri o � ta� p o � ER e ee 0 E ' e1 .O s 00 v cJ d i r- O .7. w 7 p• d E N w O. O.L .�.. O W ms s ' .0 O .0 T y ° p :� F r- y .�.. FF �.. - 44 00 ui R 7 v y 0 U a0i O _ U 0 U 7 00O. N E r y C'' £ U .°°w aEi .m U ao��'o c 7 W .>o � c �, o 'o N U '� ri 0 Chinatown Project 4-17 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISEDIWACTS..,LmARYTABLES Attachment 8 c U p VOL f L=/1 o - y Vy N — N 3 > V y 0 v E $ E - "' ELCo = oo- C h c = N _ oy�OU •• � � tC � .� .n y C d R E o E E E .E E E =a M o aii D .D � 0w o -oc ♦+ p LUC 7 > p LUC � 0 U L �.. 7 C N u C Lrj O y u 7 dz C 3 � y m 3 � E 3 = ,� ''_ s oo.Ev C CIO o s ro � E _� a - o 0 U C C d'D '—O y d _C. W C y v y N 3 = '+ + .c R T O h by C =O. w 'fl E C ev — .� O = 2 c o o. a Ft+ n .°C = cu E m` `o y c •�°-° y R 7 y o ci oo p ai .� d u a o a •� c_ v m E y w a 0 c o y Le " > CO u by o y N p o > z a`0 =C 0 3 E > 0 c ° 3 c .3 3 0 cC = a n za = y .E ei Q do o • 0 U c �� g = o Cto 0 to >tL)LC L- m O N =' '> DOn 5 O .U. 0 3 'O U N b0 N ,00 'a d V O N U' •� 0�7 Q y ,� C N R O O C. LCC w U LCC of a C N - C •• a ' tO y y 04 0 -0 U Y p C C O N 0. o p, 00.0 o b00 C V C E - o >, c c4 a :? c N .` 3 d O o y C 3 .N d y u ' _ 'c ° U o R = 00— N s o m 3 -o E bn s E . r m o 'MIa. - coy m y •� ^� > c c E c y v .. - a. ^ . s O G° yA. yULw ,b t uo y - 0 —Cs m ° U y0cm 'c =a ° o R oE Eo 0. c 0"wu md CN7 xL 'aW T • . '• . N .0O.fl NN 0 Cl15u C C>, o > O O a W > cv LC NRO x N ° - s ° oc o u ci° r x ° 0. 0 E. � 0 U > % C VQ.L dWO E C Y wL � v C w C n n C ` K 0 O V y T C R � CdU O d 'U V C ° L .0 � V -" r LC y N C4 d y M' Tc°� tE '° EoE o8 ° 0 3op o d o s° flbu s'od , ody od 2=O p V. . 7 d nry. NV •>xOD O LS E N No MCL mU0Ny O O N 00 N0 0 0 O Rct =U p U> ba - o o CO ud'w aC-hC�� o X00 7 = LC ` .= L y. y C E .fl _N �p U R 7 O N e Q m 'c > r F o` ai E y •E N0 0. Q S .� 3 U R = Cd o > > > o w to Q o a 'x y o E c a a o n c o O G. LC 'a U CL u s V 'D e>j. .T. 4-18 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Fly Y-►� Attachment 8 4.0 F QED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES d � s � Q N V d � E � o C O " C own � u`i E E v > o v U t C 2► E v E. O N a_ � a � �y C - _ c V c = U VJ O p O, w CL .0y C E ami • Un 'o .. -^a mj $wt. C • : OO 7 c6 •O 3 oy .NE E �ao. E E c, _ E o 7 Oh Lc > 'Zr > O _ O .fl d m F a o h d d Q u _ YU 0 —, Ed oDo NNo °o > caq� Ro v $ xs O0 ce R � x0s o x ° .-ZR` o UU = Oo° u 'fl '� � w > ° E > v '- c t > E U U w E n v oCI Ma U U U sO o to v x yc2 s o s 0 H U° uca V , E _ > ° a.°od oAp U E o f o y Z to o o 9O C U V U >>.y+ M V N V cE, 0 0 .-.:R�- = U L) m 'UE > U 4. y p, O N •�Oc- yc V.6 ,ci Ny . ° ° cR o c ° " - o ° . 5 poC U ° Cj06UEp 3r °Oa= ° R � p m m ° O to 0.0 m O Z U c y . s U wwFO C N c c p ' Cc) " OOa mcCb E u e N c �ypNx U ° = U O U 1 a:C7 U O -6 N d O L O p ° Q . ad R ° x Ro oc -0 -0 -0 .0 Ma a maCn CO d U M � N T e3 � p s Cd .0 R X T3 y R O > U N N — o � wCzz m ° C O ei fl homer W 0 c aac 9 c x E o c o a o`uaaxi Chinatown Project 4-19 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Fy of 175 Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT S,...MARY TABLES C y 7 y 7 U '0 y y y y U p U p w 3 as Ego Evo yv = 0o � w C o y o y y a°i c d C o °c bD' t"i 000 �Uj ``U b0D R �U` C R U - .y+ E E .E E . E'E = a.� w p y U y o - ° '° aEi •E o y R o r o a = .0 any ° ami o ° � o � � 0 0 Uo luU Co° F R E ocn _ . E o E U b d a C U p 0 _ a3 N C a C N C U U N .� v y __ 3s ' E 3s 'tO F v ° F E3 'c -0° > C R U o ° E c c y R n ° tLa. m y U > O ° 00 a i °� y 00 c t O v U rl 00 w 0 vys R c R a y OD CA y M U *� o r 3 � .__ °_ E d w t O `� y G C p,, a: t 0 0A y C Y7 O O E U 0 y 'g ., m .0 '0 .� P E b N y V GO..E. U Z 7 C .� .O O ,,,. y R C y L ca y M ayi c A o o a c $ U w ° c o o o ro ami .. y c y �? R is �. - C s 0 w ,E' d. '0 0 •p U' rip '`.: d.Cl. CO C' C y to — C L U Z 7 0 U LL ,,, y y y 'O 0 .G 0 R T y U 0 y y E .`. G 0 0 r: N 'O .� U C. L a y U U p, r. O E y o C a OA aO ` La UN t T •E wRa O EE .0 '0 = y 'o o T-0 iw > co O m CaU 0 y Oc _ C E u EA -0 0 .000 C m .0 E -Z S U v 7 0.-0 aU+ — C G..U+ y O U _ x. U C. 0 U O a„ 0 U y DD h N a O` b t U ti.L •C Y U -C 0 W Ca N z c_ x > -o o a aE Ca p o o f Q O o n' Ca `? U Q n y 0U y >, o b _ U .U. 3 0 " o s 0 y U .SY s o c3 ,cU o c E " Od cE EwoU .if p o w g d c p n 3 0 -14 R N pC 00 r- o ° 0 3 u I.SO+I. 9aae /pMNNdx�`y t.IIRm�]]{ p rcyNa :Vm� yCo :y4c�.p•s`yc°a. cy W U �v" C7 p xQ. b E OiOi0a = t C "y E (U �_° U W G Q C z 0OGUCS y . M. -0. 00 a ° y U . ` O, a) o0 bo.N -0 ,oOw aEOyoov aE• o Q•U�UU, = ° ° o a E s -0 c .x as U U 0 o as 0 U yQ . aa�Ua :° -o o a 0 0 p C y c C U ' v C O ° C . u o y > y U v r. y o U p U 3 U o codE `ai U o .v --- N 0. C O 0 O y v Gs � o o .v ° 3 m apr U 0 _ L O � •� � � w .O y N 7 OO O U2 C CU to rsy > S -G U U N t y y — .�— 'U C _ ca 'O 0 .� .0 U ' N 'O U y C '-Ui C 'C1 a'= �y U, 0' 7 w O O ca �. C C U 'G 0. W 1. _ .� U a O E O y .p N U O cJ U S O C u C w Q > ?' E fr E c°. F. E C o c w N J O Op �' L % y rfl �. 3 .y. 0.,0 e3x c vrz N > a E c' Ca C w Q.- H � V ¢ co9U Q ' R � >- o � 0 — 0 C-0 a x at 0 a s E n. 4-20 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 frvq,17 Attachment 8 4.0 F JED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES b u C a+ C u a> � y G> w r _ a 00 � a co r C U R U is 7 O N y R 'o M O.t O. O y a R d C C y 7 OD y _ �. E 'S o R H C C E• p C y CS Oq> E N F E °' O E °� c .? OU o o c y a o t 3 m $ 3 di E � = W tz= coo 00. > � � � 0 oaf c .4 aD ° � o ° gin E o � ti 3 o U C R U c E > c ° d o `> obo 3 o E E o to OU > o o S y s yE U O t .° = v — .- _. v 3 m e c 'n y d anE p s C p y 0 ?? d > .0 = 4M 19 C d td O w .0 y y U C U O y .0 V .0 ` O. tC b M C C m E CJ O.�" =' O cd C tE t t (, c° O.a `tl 'G N ry c .p..._ p U =. •> a2 ` �n � � Y E o a� y r n O U U N 'C U C 'bD •N vii CO ? •w O C C O i y ax y « ',goo yb � o c2 � � � y cd ° r. s cQE �� 3 ,E g .00 E S. U ac y -, � 0 9 ?o p° o ° F QOO t O c C � 0 N C'—O C C :? b p C O OD —: ? Y y v7 C O — U c7 L y y •a — N c3 C .0 c3 C U R _' R .E 00 c Q h F" 3 •- E .V ° o w o r� p c r a c y m E y 'fl n O is y cs C N ° ro d Y L 3 e6 y �. y T ° 7 N C. t 'O O y >> C T .E N C y y w C ca e D 3 Y E0 3ho00 CI c E U o "r o cc) ° .' ° 'a E � � - m o E ws a ^ 0t7 m y u OW --i .. CO y V V v 3 N a � � d � � C E `i r M W Chinatown Project 4-21 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 T / Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT S._..MARY TABLES cCa N � t .. z ° � � 3 $ 3 " m • 6> y N = 2 E 0 0 �.. y w C 7 0 0 c C E C 4 U O > ty�. 'D _ O E _ C y :? S c g u 00u o e o a 0 n o 0 c U o u ° y° E to R tr O ' Y o •° ' c c 00 3 ' o h a t �7 ca O L •`� R y O N O U ti ° F C u u u H c � N N .O � ca ° u w L c6 C CLO 4.) 4. ° N c c o ? p - c s y s u g •� ti u :: 00 to E E - a c scut o oz u 3 .c am a o � 00 . u .c ca � w SCO os c c c cU . u c u u M.E o as y ,.a 3 -5 C.) E o u y a ° o a To c o � 'X y e a ag 0 � 'C n c u° cE a Eo E " o .� " i c o ys E y o 3 n u y D R - U c o � u S n c .9 a.o Q � v o � ys c ET w 3 E s `" � U ° o � �� =°• aui °c ``° :� Ro.-`° � `- cc o >'= c � 'E c n u a E s t ° U 3 o 'y c ° a,` O = 3 00= w Eo 0u0 y " co � Hn. aEN ° c ,, �.EEt "? `° E •y. 0 R e R'E O '°-y°� o "i cc E a� � � a 5 a_TE u ° o H c D E c u o0 ti U ° E ° au+ c y 5 E u y c u Cq y O > w E N U .G Cd) 0 R ,C 7 O '-' O O N C y.? L 3 �-. .� W U U L w A to L E ca `� ° �+ U �p y Ey U '� �- E G O F c0 ccc E '' C 7 C 'fl p, G e# -o u o ? g =' = r =' ° u mc - h •° c $ � a > Eu n. du � auD w � E c � c u € _ " cs� v � � �_ � � 'c � fl` c � Evd � E � ' u m y c y � E U c o 0 '9 z w c ° c E L c c o c FE aci aci > a h d N °? n o M "_' c o n.'= a,v 3 n aur L M E c c u c 6 E _ ea a 5 � ? C r - y o to 4: n ti 3 c R n a s . r-w y o cQ' on ° m u c 4o F c ti m u a c oub O w ` c y — �� F c W o c °3 tZ a+ 2 C E E 7 w U y v, E N d O C 'O O E R .� u v, o, c u o u :? o E -a a°j :: c u o y c y '-o - n c :? > a� y c _> c c u - c o � 2 2 4 0 c c -c v� E 3 s U r+ n °a00 g v c a 2 E M U � y T.y n A .d ° c :? cc 0 � •° ai •° o y c� U k0 > .4 °° y x o c > u c c u - z '00U 5 m pCp 4a � .a a`0 h a m 3 ysF O E .E ha c aci 'y 3 E y c c w h U m O v. 0- Q. 'C `. w 'O C S 0.= y �. _ °�o h CO 'p G.v 'p p 2 a"U. m c E a ° U � •S .c n. � � n. � c O fl. c u to v� � a3 x c. E ouc 4-22 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009'L, / Q/ F#Lf-I:V Attachment 8 4.0 F SED IMPACT'SUMMARY TABLES c c. V N .2 CSC+ c5 V O m U IUn .0 iy � � O U r.� 7 0 — E— E a °oca EE pE ° >• 2 C m C C E yr2 o ° e o " N0000 B: y o ° 3 v aai m -°o U o c ;°� o -0 _d N ° N 0 Cr. OU E'I 2ew •:ULEIf.+O�paCOe"•C.�+.'1 ��aNS�onr,i1 •�tLflcC�NNUc°mLl.' ,•yEr_3vNhE toNm LC ,3 .' • O t�.O OOE CQyN RT A3°oUof :y° O U L _ ; _7 0d_:.E 0 -0 ° t•'_0°°n'D =•dcc"U7a"Xii CS 0 a: cc c V '3 00 i UU MW cE � � Uo E cmo0] o .0 .c ='c N Oy 0fl OT E o 3 C c T ° > > N5 NCC N N •StCU N O O E > O U o =O o v UO > . 0 O O Z 0 E � — 0a r0 ' C C > L3 ° aRmNCCS O O °ae C 2 _ E m o °0o 0 c S0 ', o - U U c •ct u Uoat _ ° oLaE - U N 0. 00 _ Of'1 >,i O ° R 3 a a . e0o ° E - N U 0 ro -0 0h o0E Aism — U - o ° 0 _ UNa. 7 " ° � ` � 0. oE0 >,.2 0 y o c as0 CO 00 uE c c U to c E V) ca U > A 0C0 os0o > " ° 3Ec w o o eo cc o $ 0 N o 0o ° Cs o 0 3 e ._ •C E ao 4 O 0o ° M M • oE c : oxL � o C O E U to .0 0 U 002 E o La U 4 0 °aw3 (n G ca fl N N 7 03 v V L o• .r � y ° �+ 3 0 N la ~ Cy d U > y 0 o 0.0 d m aE0 U 3 y C y T ° U i V] e>0 n oc_o y o W ° .. s •N U � ri bo R 1 a, c = � n F w x � Q = rs x n a `m Chinatown Project 4-23 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 f1 I ' Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT S,_.MARY TABLES ° U vyi .U+ 'b d O L = E V c o E Y n E o n e y C o 3 •- °3 0 vUi `a 0._p U 7 C C bA 4 p0 noy E E E c 6 y o c o 'on o a. ° c aci o .E. a U'no Lr:, •� n' O cCs R y n, o W CL E y: CC .E 3 'y = c CQ d y 0 .0 �. O O p L C C 9 N C a'y .Eya o> '� � � yN � x > w" ot°'- o79a�°i0 [� oaIoM.iQ > o c3O t e � N � E � > a £ � ° �� E ° Oo y � C •> C 4:. V j;� L y a•'D O C G C a� O O O t U a� a�� -0 rA n a E �c 'u°- m ° a 3 aOi c `o N c e o y c ° c a c M N ,y y R � Y E E. > o ° $ �o 0 o N "v = N E d � y _� E a p R C G w w e °O C p T C t c c y •i C LC V O 3 :Ovi 0,C y T vi y O 4 c U c m n x y o d ID 3 .° > o c c°i y 0 'E o �, c r y o y E E c a o` V ca C `� U M P:.t d C U c° OU - U L y. >T'g `° ` 0O E 0.0 > C - O .- p y CUaA 'O U Z C C m v, N F UO O N n * Q M L > 3 U t u0 •E Q w C C N 6 .O y O G m N :3 o � [i' r U a or °' 3 E 2 u ° � c o U o csY w `p n• aMi C $ is `° 0 7 'c •n' O .> m $ 0 ca 00'DO C W 'O 'W = o o c a °3_' o c .o °-' IOU N � E- 0 3L E o o f E E o o ° o c o y • B m c 5 s b E� �ca� Hm � ro 'oQauoa '� nz a PC 0. U E a 2 w a.'rs ' >1 ' `o a Po 0 a c U no c o U ;pE 0.0 y aUi o U y > w e E a c T o o a' w .i N y N �. RU C o - W m > > 9 Et- m a 3 d FT°� ti m c -0 W 3 o o .N Z cv E r " o t p °° O .5 .-M £. .+ ri .a -E U 4 iii Z n.'> ?: 4-24 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 J �1-f q 8� Attachment 8. 4.0 A 3ED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES C w o ° cQ C C c°- s _ c °� o b d o au h n - O N C 3 a au`c o fl b N N N > E N - .E3o L � 'U Ow v _a o R 6 O " N c > > N E o N hN 3 •y p L C rri O r- 00 ffi S y N OL O :? O N a FnscNNNEi: E.y y.V Oq'y •O ° O M N eC w N O C p t N C U o N u R s E N cwe c Y ac o 3 3 c >, c N E .=.n N C y (L'] C p 'L 'y d �1 fYQ L N ° 2 b -0 g d N � r- 0 b 'a y • C .� E C L y `� C p U v Rf C A C a L1 C F" O0 N E ONU a L c = p O m d 7 �_° C a c y O V E O y N y C N pNp C O..° y ._ m V N m R E C > .•-: L .B C .� C C a y N '° N H N t E c H ° a E E ' ."-' y = m .E co y 3 y o n st�° " " >> °'E e Na c 3° cd =E °` . 3 > >0 0 > t p O o C >m •E og E . . v s ce a � ca 3 V a N`0 tn>N0 $ u .�C o = Ev f Cs "? c'Er4° n ` ao E o d y a _ o E y N •O e7 N C F by C t°t N Id. CS '� U >� o N E .E E N L c ' R P. o y `o E E > ti m .N w `u LLL c M � F ° c g c R u E y N '� 0 0 a Ila c c" b' N - ° b E s E e0 a a Q N e o N � E s U �- e ! .E y u c, N L w ._ N � A c ca m � .� c c n = y w ° E N c n c °u E ` .. c F F 00 e O R E to 5 R ° 3 c °' o N ,g e r4 c CL c ° c N N o ❑ A .4 c w •_ raT� u 'y 'E' a� o n m °� ° N Q o a E p R/ 1.. N bA 7 N U 1.. C) Q V F R U ° FI N E u F V •� 3 Cd M N ° U h p L y c pp E y C N U b O O V O N m L dw. Nos r" N n. > ro c s �.� �a �'�, �v �o E E m a Cn c N c0. 3 i E A ro?? FL U �g o ff U I y O O O N 3 E o y G Y C DAA 0 .0 yF .°q p O, oY = VJ y y D Uw c9 O c3 U a o •" 3 0 " o a+ O N 4 U O N R �• N .�+ 0 O to•O — N v, a C 'C N LLO y y w U CI0 'U 00 U 'V C C (Q y a U1 7 O c3 .vJ L N a N O > N V F O 7 E > Chinatown Project 4-25 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 P 4 1 Lt — t d 4.0 REVLSED IMPACT Sk RY TABLES A aC h I Yl E P'!� .n V1 R A a� s • •n o - y D v ig B c _ or VI y.V� `•i. O O E u u ° v C' CO A CO_f1 Oh� R ti �. 00•L C G> +3 0 � •r �.CU W m E a E rd _ y e s CL E � b � - LC > C O 0 i 0 y � ' S E c E $ U r 7 0 a 7 3a�00iEo o ° r to W _ d w s oo c o °� o 08 -4 pyo F ° to yw °y oE Y s•�^ 80 . 't0 . o0 Eo E `o - o0 -0o a 0 O OaE amOOr C 0 ,N F ° o c x � � :ev2 � � by3 °� 0 E � Ea c " a° 'y � � d •y E v y U c y 3 y y o N 4) ° ° c • c E 7 c E E � y 7 . c a°is ^ �bU ° o U o E 'to o dca o O 7 U O y G. > 0 y G E °E 2 -0is .0 Y .M :K �' .r00 N 000 O 4". a y E .� 'fl Q E 9 u a ° � c en g Cz 0 aci ° c .= m a o o G. � ° � �_ .E ^� � D � � oc � 0.0a ° E °° E0 � � v 0 3 d o ° H 0 •0 0o a _ 3 a"i s = c Q° o U C y O E O .0. ca 'd c:.E C a� •D N C b •+�• p0.9 0 G p Fa c°i c 0a o y 0 m ° 0 '�5, o p 4 `d v°' 3 0 .°c d 5 � � _ cgo aopzi x '> U dU 3 C 0 °D fl c R 2 - s 3 v ° a c °$30osao,._ ° w o CQ y L C O w N O. R m p, r A �-. r ea .0-. C y U tL > y �-' O > > U 0 cya cd •d. `' .L . O O E a c yt3 -- W 40- 0 wo0 0 Z7a00:0 >. O 0' a' ° ° �CO •-- o > 0 0 0 , O.0 Z2 0 — tn.+`i'+ ,LS " ~ p cv 0 HC w? 'H y3a=° � oyaa " b cCaSri ti7 wN HE °c " E 0 a c an ° 0 too to 0E E •br o ?u o ai � ° v ° ° E ° y y '^ W C C C � 'R — c sy aai E 0 a 0 F •0 w t 0 C 0 C R R5 E t 7 M N 4N O -7 F O Y .� V as d j > O C o > >,'a .O0 H > is 4.. 000 h � c0a .� b0 C U >O OD 7 a Oq p, E > 6 R L= z `d ° a ° d ocs 030 ;a as v00. R . _mcE pO Ea0Rc ti am U E aR A o a0 c U ° y t 7 c d v E ar ti � � 4z c EZ � ns E � a aE ° y u EE2 31s C�j c y 8 ° ISI R U ++ y L' a E y U a a :. o � ti t O E C r O d 0II d E >1 R F `L � 0 = £ v 4-26 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 pt4 q t? -' Attachment 8 4.0 I SED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 7 C C O rG y � s m y d w o E -oE ~� Y E y a o .fl N 3E L y ° t O R R _ V Uv ey > E E p a1 ° EL c t y as y '� Ra. d o. >1 ry >+ ¢ c cE a 00 Um 0yR E o o Q •� vs . > " � � '> 2 „�„ V L 0. O O •— �, as .— Y V w Ca w aoU cU� � e "� yc xy = :? dRroy g • da - .5 pyy3 M 0.'y E d > r V > v — 9 E • c w _ v p>iyE � y t>=CA— x o y — >' > rEo� c A v O yO E 0 Y<3a5 y o c c ai f� .� ° y m y R �. c ° p as t aai •3 0 > __ °= Y s c c .` •° o = o y a: a R c y c > U A ° a: R •y , b y a :. g y �+ d 0.'D ._ ca y. y c4 C O = of C �«. N 's .° 0. y > 3 R ca N m y C N O y C d p y V 0.'C ca y R R G ` t y y O �"- �Vj 0. V S_ pO N aJ R V is N y cy N y ° .cV� y p pp 0 ea ,y 9 y p, M y. 'n N ¢ V d of O t' y ,D _ 3 O y = V y V C p y >> p .o ocnd o S ac &, J c 3 3 v v � [r y •E ca o a'y 03 a� UU' RC c E E -o R `' oFi '� R c °op^^s -o c .E W y > C O C y N N �, a7 of of 00 «. 7 y 7 V O N O m c 3 .— V C •--� es d C 0 y � V C V L y O 3 y ' E- a c $ a �' oab y .j y v .°Uai F a 0 a p - E c ° "a cU �eoo > > pc vim. o E o v o ; o Ca o y o c 3 t y F. F c O _ '� o w o > o ami ♦+ Q O .0 U Ca f�+1 CJ" 4= C 0. V ND y O y ca y .y N N 'C Cn a C v, Q N — V o .c a F •ca fu 0a°� c o .E a .° t cs aci = F ° z �° w t d y - ° E� s E ° o D . y O o V . y 0 7 y .LV, y y U M `rn N 'O N C p C d 0 r4,y TJ .cC.. 4 y N _ •� C O ca _ ami t y .` w y V O.'D—'s V 0 r- O a� w y m E C C L a O y v, O m 0 pA m a s v aU o •D .0 c: 3 V c O .. m ._ o a E- 0. V CO -D E on... C9 Fy L M F m 'C Q C U `Q e 0 Y N .;+ o W ° c � L � F c o c £ ~ u Chinatown Project 4-27 Final E/R Addendum-September 2009 ' / Q3 Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACTS. MARY TABLES 'L7 CL O w C v y a ra CL R � Z� C Rd v = d O Y en y C y rs >, y y d c s o Eo y v yA L s C y R = 3 :a E G & 7 V t; v ? Y U c 3 y V R y `L' T•0 0 N Cy �• 0 0 of (Y. _ = V N i0 fA r N > 4. V ..+ t. > r O y — = r .0 W C•m �_ 'O L c=0 V v •�. y C Y c CISQ T 0 .- C 3 r7 = — �, u y � y � c a � o 'D i° R c R c p °� aHS R a•°i � c N t O a y a y O y �«. '� C f.4 y .� m a = y m V U L F n' '0 � L•„ V N c0 3 0 = c�0 O m C >�_sC C C C y F ' _ ° y o V v .` y a on O - u c a C y C N N •= y C 4•w y �_'O a a..0= 07 X O C = > E N O O .0 N "' L .0 7 .0 a > bR0 > aai E °' 3 ° . x o a•- o O � m aci o n6 a :+ y y v4° a ° ° ° a>i . do :3dcmR tUF��my0.C'r+�. rGyyda+s svdC°va' v•_adC tgooC7 o>p_ tloVcNn—naci enc y LFE, m`� Cnc >N> so ay LZ 0 IU r'C33°y F " r. t.ayVVOCE O va On a 6O y O .0 R X o — 0 y 0 CC) CrL R o DL O n z : .0 U ^E . > O = aCJ dv � Eo CL > Cn ° � NE ° N Yoec > .0 Oz o .0 0 > c0 V s yo o c E 1 10 a - y0 O O a > L° Eo o o is 0 n V 00 .0 G. yT " c cV d ? c o O — du.i ? r C OO C ` d M 0 00 0 y bo d R a° Fes. orz L3E FM. °cnt > E �? L � � FE $ v o z o n - c v F :? = € on •R - w 3 _ 3 00 o _ Saxi ° 333Ep _ 0rz nd cya_i " EL '? cioccv E pD .cu o •a •a . .0 E M ;o •0 0. 3 c y w � E WD z a E E .~. L W E_ R = UC° e 0 :. N ,0„ V] O W a� R 4-28 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 Attachment 8 4.0 I SED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 20 U U U d m U C N y � d d ami o ° y sa cres ? o d v _E 03 0 O >0>i 4 c ? v y v O c o c o c > > v m y 0y Q y Q d m W 7 w N c y 3 cm �, c y 3 °a y c 3 R b E a� •o o u Ew o u E = o u Ew o n 'yr 0 C .0 � CCO .0 c..0 OCn.0 c .0 •bCn y.r p y b m '0 m '� 03 y m .� m .0 w m L >s C C n ° y n ° m aci 'o :o° m m E 7 U .'° 3 as U E E Ect _ osEy ra ea 'C 'fl .0 y •0 y .0 .0 .0 y C s m U C w a c d a c d -4 l a c d �a d RE � oo •E � aci `ooE � acio` o `� cmieb .Ew is sdgEno sgEyo � gEao n '' ° yenecn E c U m E c = E c .c 'Q L 7 0 7 L 7 000 U 7 S 0 0 „�-„ O •� C CC C t C d C p C d O = C O O a ° yQ d ° 'W � do v E c c y y o I�Cl1 d yC C z wo°9U O Om d C C 4C end bn'O d W 00 C to E o $ p p r Eo `o E4-- mEp, mb 'a m .4m O E Ecc ` -o ri .� = 3 E d C cdUmEUNwO O >U u. � _. Y R w 7 03 c . zO dy m ' ddm.._"'D '0 Cb > >�L ;C=p, UaAi y> d d y d ° U m d m , M 0 , m00y `Ocn v o aTo / _ V = to o O O o > U O N00 y 7 o U O ^ O Cp d d O. U s h 3 c o t m r 3 c.Q o c a ,u m 0000 m L y L E o C4 o d d m 4 C m o E m o d a 0 = y y y °: O0 w `� E U ° y Y 6._ dcc 7 ° E" Q c ° o cn c E 0- y -mc 'o'E �'w o 0i R.4 euus .E a a� E U aci a u 06 Q m = c Q d U CO p a y o ` m 'a E ° F- vi oo E c U 0 c� '�T '-° mv a " _ ° E R aci � E c d U •E E m e L p c s E o _ . oYs an d m cY - � n. >, Ob = o > h u E d `o o n a y .— � U o m c o 'A U c m S v° y g E y E F d :: a`s o • b e c �» D o Y i 9 as u .m c a'ci F m '� o m v � F c A - m m E s 'y a m tl.+ m �n U y 7 �' 6 p d - E E c d � Cr ° ° c d o o n > d E a d R y R m a OD U t L t y O E m U 3 y y m m w 'o Q 'y an C O >' Z U y p, d ~ $ � cs '� E a E o .d c d 3 O o° .. m p > Q o 0 0 a E d o a•y c E s o L y o O c y a m o yd ,• m y o y d y y L > y C o a o a m as Xr d aE '-' u C. 0 y a ?? = ° E o` w y L t L t C 0 t ' U C L y d,y 'O 3 E .p d F a d E F. ?. c U F >1 y d y v y d c b o y n n o 3 .� r Y .2 y m n F F o c U F' ° d o o o u 0 3 c o aEi w Chinatown Project 4-29 Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 1'�,I , T" I 7 ''� - Attachment 8 4.0 REVISED IMPACT S ..NARY TABLES 6I 7 C w C u a ,4tx Q C CM b > O C d E 0 a o ,� 7 E c s " t d E N F„7 '� 3 c" v, y E y c `° .` Y. c c ` f1. y v y o -o s v ca'. `O c 0 Q.L O R y y V O CO 70 m E" ° = E m ECZ U 3 c c $ c y d a A z y 3 on c E w p (u 3 ° �e o o f nF c o c R ° 8 n.U 't ` x c Cz ° m E � A .;; .- - a� >, > U o y °i o os ++ .b V m C. C ` 3 C w O .0 4N .'_' U 7 .O 'a �:_ R a y M. C* L .� ) � - y 0 0 L O C >O"C F^r s ou U - s E C CU o Z' t ° oi o ° o 'mn 0> 0° ° ' c Ev — ° ° Os � v o b = M cJ U O N O oo �N O i .o _ ai u o = E Nc c � > Y � •C= �- ocE o. o U c 0 u sw0 o S 03 E a en = o` u° > mNc�`ti U o c v s 'oOyA p 4. cQo" s ua U E E o On yoh E d C.o •-° sF°� c° yr °U, bF s3° $5cRy 0 00 r- o> U c oR u> E o0aaHayi 00 CuS Z FFO C G p � oE n ,5 kF y rhC oa ° C w° °° 0 ov F Q 'E s o IJ A. oo c RC3 =` °° c c s X .E E y w° . . . Q ,A a U c m G m m y c%1 ,M F � C U m e 0 N a f/1 `o L 3 F G0 o e 4-30 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 FN 4F -18f,(. Attachment 8 4.0 1 SED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES r N N O O E E o $ c N `o > R C •N .0 > 'O .+ .D 7 C. C O.L 7 c. C 0.7E 7 70 ccN N yCV Ro° •�u i°s 3cv c E E oGO CC 3 m "�a Va 0 E iZ O` c 0 � 0 C . N Co v U 6l C ._ OAC C C C .� N N y •O. b - " -C aci n '. •- m 4 = E a� _ 4 = E ami G> +� E R .O N E b u N N c E > N O ca O —3 EO m p — Iq y b O N N . N C — c — -O 7 7 C E l c o E T c o E c°� ° 'E 3 E 4.b ° E E d v O CO O y C y N ca M y C w E c es E s $ E y E .° N U E .° _ 'O L 0 7 t 7 0 C 7 t c E. E U .b y N —' �" N 'O y N L.. o ° 7 Q R _ 'E Q c _ �D a 3a��iEod 3a��i � o � 3aODi `� �i EooO ._ OA Eoo °' � eA L L oU U E 7 y .. V V E l y ai,w n u F CV .7 y y fl R 4 a ca rn °° E- ° o c t 3 t D .5 u a E U .: R c " ca c E N 0 aU c d c -o n. N U ° c o fu ee QN o ra n o 3 a u 3 y A sN > C �E ° E E u o U o U c � '3 n. 'a W LZ Nlu i to V ., Dd n' 4: .1 EEm , .00 >, ° O woo > ca� 4. E ° —oTs rP3 ao— � ° y ° ° a` 0.-00A ° yp` o ^_ 3 c.2 s s U B M E c E 7 v s H c CO o O U o 'c " i� ; o D N o u O Y N3 CL .+ CC U C_. t N E .2 :E ti > a E N3 0 R 0 o> E ° 4a>i, y 5U E u o • -° UL saE > ' > >c E Odd N > 0 ._ 0 O o u eo c N °. ay o . U ao W ECuo 0yEc0 EEa7o fp aa m a F a ` c o ed aai 0 3Uas y o cd ac o • w U o c �- r+ O r- O N ON d >> Y y .""' C. N '� CV T .>'. N y 'RO N ` E F E E F SO 0 o n U U E C F o =; d E 'y F o U U F �' E y U m F r F _ = ° a A N E o A = v a y E o pC,p 3 m z n d a0.i m a" = U �' O7A�, ° 0 a E ; LO E c O U YO > GJ E. 4) a v as �, 'C ...' _ .E = V Q. fa U ` U T N V y fa U 7 y N >t-s Cc CJ N > 9 n y ° sU a y C 3 ►r 3 > o y oA.n a.•a y u •- '> U o �. n. o 65T O c N V C L V N N .>•. y V V ° v °° o U C -0 sy . c > 4es c cU n. E O w'0. 00 . CL ' Roc ; . > NNS cs N U >� _ O N , yvyHUG =.opy ycrC o. O v ' s a E- cc U ;? > d mu 'toLc F :1a -06 'v H 3 c .� F: > u H > 3 3 > 'E .° y rs a� ;? a ro c .. C y �e m F' _ c m 00 o c = `o o '� OUA a H E E E 00 y Q\ U '�. v. .... C L 7 N C C ` c3 E a F o c 4 •- > epi �. F �•. OA o f o o rc o OU .0 r6 ba s A a. ou v u; Chinatown Project 4-31 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 1 Attachment 3 4.0 REVISED IMPACP d01ARY TABLES Q C U C O C U C E- c .a o c as Ey y E E '„C„ .0 y o � E � .� `o � E � _ 04 as 0 as o o oa ++ CL C y�j 0 0. C y 0 d C4 n'� C m C C C y C C CJ (U am . "E E a = c to a EooE � .00 E o� .m = w >, o d o a t a� .2 >. a :: E E E �amli " ao = Ya � TO ° E o mwoe fl 0E oREpEE eEi _ a� yU o c y `� U c aM. E E 3 c x T d c'E vRNt wO L cC yC C c3 y E '� o Q) yc0CtEO ° N aE U sO L aw3 _cao iE V RV .�'D vi N O c0 w O a N p > C 'mC 00E • 6pdC aC y GN> Ow O0. EO °U -0 E 00 U w _ C O C � U A >`d0 � Cu >c c c E o E c O U .0 o°o Z °° b ° •E c p c W i y � n .E i ? U -0 n.U $ can " C: .O+ v O ate_ E M Co'O E C O a1 �C TU C4 U N ab .�. '� R C °' y .E E ,e °.t > 3 .° 5. >,:>_ C y ti L a`U E ,T y .0 d 7 N U a m w N i3 >. N L O U d ueC n U °� �_ R a a a°i R b s 3 p '� y d o ti �" a o �_ �+ m ..-, a y A a ce E 9 0 C w -0 C U '- N 0 L C O ''0 y �° 0 00�iCd f�1 •£ O c0 ° a N A O 'O y O C O w N O C o r g E F o cs .o `^ c Cd y m a a U _ E r) E o M w � 3 O V C ° afli 0 o E 0 d E6 y c „ u c c o c °� 2 u h � or m h ° o o O as ro c°i h :: °aa L. F. i a U y N C 0 y y by � � O anA ._ a � ° � f3' o � C7UL1 � s 0 � H 3 � w ti �L OD U L U OW V C U C C p.i > E V O v, ►r � � •x a a �y W1 N H n• N C. > �. U O O U V � 'D OU •eUa Q. o Q ° a fl ay cO ° A N e 0 R E y o T V� y a3 n. ° aLn.D � FC) � n ej U a ° y 4-32 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 20 ' /+` Attachment 8 4.0 .3ED IMPACT SummARY TABLES T,D O �•ty O �" C m �• C N O c U = O C U = y OCD N Oy 5 N p 0.•� N E.._ E y v E ._ E y L' Ca v v 'O O O .- r0 O v y p •� v y 0 v v r .0 v Vel r •� N = N O ''90 E O '�O E C v � C fl # m O O n O � = Vy C C m CN = y C C y c=¢ C _ E .� L y U E .� 'd O V C h -.+ �..' O .+ C y •� it E O O E sE 0 0 E S .ao 0 N O •C F p c c c y ti R W a Cma cE o >, bD. 'O cd -c U o mv O c r- r. -1c y C d4 ?3 O ti E v a u c a C 'a U c v 3 F C c y y a.b = 2 F U ° v c 'ti � •- R 3 c ai _ c c E 0 E p y c y .�+ L .D .0 m d IJ c4 c -0 `p � : y03-0 0 � E E c .. v d m 3 °W' Or- o L '05 R ^ Cs N N G.ca V N R C -OD U = VJ N U °D Q T:a O O ct.+ 3 a O a y a'0 w m n s °� ° y y r H m u =' � 3 o h A � .� °y E o is O �6anu � O Cs C Vo v c0 T s F" N OS+ v T O •0. O. �. N = no c 'C c n c p Wo ° U E- CJ c c 2 -0 .3 '- « 2 av � so0 Cr o o S° a � .0 c 'E ° ca c. 3 Y .E °LIa _ y D R > t U. 0 I.r d a 'G G, •7 U A y L O y 'p O r d O O � U aOi p �.. m = aT 34° �� E � 0 7O C E cc y 0.° ° E E C aXi 'Q 'C N O v U L v 7 C y _ v F a E `Z F L o 3 .^� c :. E CO - o v E ca U a3 ii o F " Cas 'a rim a .5 c an. � .° S .° U v Chinatown Project 4-33 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 p L( G7 I F1 4.0 REVISEDIMPAf `AmmARYTABLES Attacnmpn C C C C C 7 n CS n tC eLO oLO ao oD oLO C C C c C n O Cs n O CL s r y Uf N Vl Vi U U N N U a a a a o E oo o 3 3 3 3 r0 U U U U U x E E E E E y O u C s H Go � a a a a a c o > > o 'a 3 3 3 3 3 N V) Vi VJ VJ E E E E E m 0 0 0 0 y O 000 000 COLO OD 000 � „ .E •E E E •E E z z z z z i � o E N a T C ►� Cw •3 O dU ui W T O `O C cT7 w C O OD._ Nm 3 ,E v 3 Evv, c o O N •-Ui O 'er �t V N ° 3 0 y >,. o ^ U >U> � o c .O � COD cc p O `c cE OtO C a U 'fl o E 0. _ CL 0 £E cN U cW c > = Z 'E Nm CLO yO rn-..E c c > o E o n o CLO N N E C ri > o n a epi a.E O ri U .S 'c 0.i M Cw7 n o axi ri �� a eoD.�1 s Q 4-34 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 fHY-1*70 Attachment 8 4.0 Rms: 4PACT SUMMARY TABLES c c c c ca ca U U U •C 'C •C bq bA oL .VJ •N ,N C c C m R ca N N N E 75 E E E C O .Vi c ani s r+ c E .2 C ;a E > C .0 U U N C ,� O ao 4 a a OU = C C c c E CU9 CQ_ >1 '0 W >>i .0 O O. p O •N •C O 0 'D t � � y c 7 r..1 N .0 0+ 00 t � N N' 'c � 0 -0 Ca n vii " ' oon c aci c Ecom •o 0 N c y > o d e a s > > YCJ cam. .D X C C d O oD r- ca N ti c 'II 'y L:. N 0. a7 ea QQ W v ai en c R .E = E E f� G v c C U d S C. O to �. C >' m R U C t�+1 'fl N N O o Eo o n a �s ao y 'a ro 0 0 E o . . . . Na °' z z 0 - a> o c o o c a u CL oc =� 0 0 d U y(x 7SE :Ev :o .E L N c m N o — z E c s .E 'S 3 E c o aon w 0. � . > o V o Vt+11 Lc c �o Rv ° s ynRo ywU E Gr . .OdNcUw V 3o ° ca. ° d z04= ..xMmO �•oom a � ,� w os ao. o M0C7 y .p1 o y cca F o °� v F o o 0 a .�. w v N y U E a U E > o0 c 0 _0 c U M 3 C4 z M .O ..� E a .r W 0. G U R N C 0 U •5 C C 7 C^ E ri z a 06 v�'.W e+i ox. _ axi nx. °I' 3 � C7 U x Chinatown Project 4-35 Final EIR 4.0 REyisEDIwACTmARY TABLES 1 Attachment c U .0 bA C s.. H _N +� N GQ y G V C u C .0 F a o g L b � O tu � 3 y L � w �c y G rG� r- 0 14 0 � 00 v a y E z i +y+ C R � O a � h O L. rA F N .n R a 7 C t i. U j oW G � 'c � u F •� o 0 4-36 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 J Attachment 8 RESOLUTION NO. XXXX (2009 Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE FINAL DESIGN OF THE CHINATOWN MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE C-D-H ZONE (ARC 30-09; 861 PALM STREET AND ADJACENT PARCELS) WHEREAS, the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) conducted a public hearing on September 28, 2009, and determined that the revised project design is appropriate in the Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts, and recommended final approval of the project design to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and City Council; and WHEREAS, the ARC conducted a public hearing on October 19, 2009, and recommended approval of the project design to the City Council; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City 'Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, on November 17, 2009, pursuant to an application filed by SLO Chinatown, LLC, applicant for the purpose of considering ARC 30-09, final design review for the Chinatown Project; and WHEREAS, notices of said public hearing were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with Update that was previously certified by the Council on December 18, 2007, along with the Addendum dated September 2009 prepared to update the EIR, which was reviewed along with revised project plans by the CHC and ARC; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered all evidence, including the testimony of the applicant, interested parties, and the evaluation and recommendations by staff, presented at said hearing. BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows: SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council finds and determines that the project's Final EIR with Update as updated by the Addendum dated September, 2009 adequately addresses the potential significant environmental impacts of the proposed project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City's Environmental Guidelines, and reflects the independent judgment of the Council.. The Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in this Addendum in its consideration of the final project design and finds that the preparation of a subsequent EIR is not necessary, based on the following findings: Findings 1. None of the circumstances included in Section 15162, which require a subsequent EIR have occurred, specifically: a. The project changes do not result in new environmental impacts. b. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken will not require major changes rHY,- 113 Resolution No. (2009 Series)' Page 2 Attachment 8 to the EIR. c. The modified project does not require any substantive changes to previously approved mitigation measures. 2. The proposed additions and changes are minor and generally consistent with the previous mixed-use project evaluated for the same site by the City Council with certification of the Final EIR with Update on December 18, 2007. 3. All of the updated mitigation measures are reasonably necessary to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels and become project conditions. 4. The changes are consistent with City goals to promote the intensification of infill sites, respect the context of the site's setting in two. historical districts, provide a project scale compatible with its surroundings, accommodate pedestrian flow through the site and onto adjacent streets, and bring economic vitality to the downtown core. 5. The proposed scale and design of buildings will be compatible with surrounding uses as found by the City's Architectural Review Commission with their review of project plans and are consistent with the .City's General Plan, Zoning Regulations, and Community Design Guidelines. SECTION 2. Action. The final design of the Chinatown Project (ARC 30-09) is hereby approved, based on the following findings, and subject to the mitigation measures listed in the attached Exhibit A and the following conditions: Findings 1. As designed and conditioned, the building materials, style, character, and form of the new structures within the project will promote the architectural character, style, form, and materials of the existing Downtown and Chinatown Historical Districts and complement the architectural character of the surrounding buildings and area consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Program Guidelines. 2. The project is consistent with standards contained in the City's Community Design Guidelines for the downtown, which encourage projects to be pedestrian-oriented, and to have proportions and design details that complement surrounding structures 3. The project's design is consistent with the design principles contained in Section 4.16 of the Land Use Element including providing pedestrian-oriented spaces on the ground floor of buildings, continuous storefronts, and upper floor dwellings and offices. 4. The project is consistent with the mitigation measures adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007 with the certification of the Chinatown Project EIR & Update and the recently completed Addendum. Resolution No. (2009 Series) Page 3 Attachment 8 Conditions 1. Final project design and construction drawings shall be in substantial compliance with the project plans reviewed by the CHC & ARC and ultimately approved by the City Council. A separate full-size sheet shall be included in working drawings submitted fora building permit that list all conditions, and code requirements of project approval as Sheet No. 2. Reference should be made in the margin of listed items as to where in plans requirements are addressed. Any change to approved design, colors, materials, landscaping or other conditions of approval must be approved by the Director or Architectural Review Commission, as deemed appropriate. 2. Detailed rehabilitation/restoration plans shall be submitted for both the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings along with building permit applications for seismic upgrades. Plans shall clearly delineate building features to remain, including Ah Louis bricks to be retained in place or to be reused in other parts of the project, and provide precise details on features that will be created to replicate historical architectural elements as shown on elevations. Public access to the historic baking ovens of the Sauer Bakery Building shall be maintained and reflected on plans submitted for a building permit. 3. The Morro Street elevation of the hotel shall be further articulated using architectural elements similar to those used on the linear park elevation of the hotel to the approval of the Community Development Director as part of the submittal of working drawings. 4. Plans shall include window details indicating the style:and type of materials for the windows, mullions, their dimensions, and colors. Plans shall also include the materials and dimensions of all lintels, sills,surrounds,recesses, and other related window features. 5. Plans shall clearly show the depth of molding features, details on all railings, balconies, balustrades and other decorative architectural details, and storefront details. 6. The plaster finish for buildings shall be smooth-troweled or sand finish. 7. All City Council approved mitigation measures contained in the Final EIR with Update and Addendum shall be included as conditions of approval, and are incorporated herein by reference. 7. As called for in Mitigation Measure TT-7a, the applicant shall pay parking in-lieu fees for a total of 188 parking spaces prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Permits for the seismic retrofit and remodeling of the Muzo's, Sauer Bakery, and Blackstone Hotel buildings may be issued prior to the payment of in-lieu fees. 8. The parking structure has not been designed to accommodate self-parking; therefore, the structure shall be accessed by the valet and residential tenants only. No self-parking shall be permitted by other users. pq gas Resolution No. (2009 Series) Page 4 Attachment 8 9. Consistent with Mitigation Measure TT-4, the building plan submittal shall include a summary of and show all the required and proposed short-term and long-term bicycle parking per M.C. Section 17.16, Table 6.5, and in accordance with standards contained in the 2007 Bicycle Transportation Plan update and Community Design Guidelines. Plans shall include the dimensions for, locations of, and details and detail references on the plans, for the proposed bicycle parking facilities and/or racks per City standards. 10. Consistent with the goal set forth in Mitigation Measure TT-3a, a minimum 8-foot wide clear path of travel for pedestrians shall be maintained on the Monterey and Palm Street sidewalks. A narrower clearance may be allowed on the Morro Street sidewalk with documentation of extenuating circumstances and to the approval of the Public Works Director. Building insets are permitted if needed to accomplish the 8-foot clearance requirement. 11. Consistent with Mitigation Measure TT-3h, a minimum 10-foot wide clear path of travel for pedestrians shall be maintained through the hotel paseo when it is not closed for special events. 12.The specific art proposals for the project shall return to the ARC for review at a later date once developed by artists and approved by an art jury as overseen by the SLO Arts Council. 13. Details of lighting fixtures shall return to staff for review and approval, either prior to, or along with, the plans submitted for a building permit. The locations of all lighting fixtures shall be clearly called out on building elevations included as part of working drawings. The lighting schedule for buildings shall include a graphic representation of the proposed lighting fixtures and cut-sheets shall be separately submitted for the project file of the proposed lighting fixtures. The selected fixture(s) shall be shielded to insure that light is directed downward consistent with Section 17.23.050 of the Zoning Regulations. Details of all exterior light fixtures, including site lighting and service area lights, need to be included as part of plans. A note shall be included on plans that "Lenses of exterior wall-mounted lights may be modified or shielding devices added after installation if the Community Development Director determines that they emit excessive glare." 14. A specific sign program for the project shall be to the review and approval of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC). The sign program shall include information on the sizes, locations, colors, materials, and types of signage proposed for various buildings and project directional signs. Project signs shall be designed to be compatible with the architecture of proposed buildings and to complement the site's setting within both the Chinatown and Downtown Historical Districts. Once adopted, the sign program shall contain provision for the Community Development Director to approve minor deviations to the approved sign program if findings can be made in support of the exception being consistent with the intent of the program, and in keeping with the design characteristics and historical context of the building(s) and/or site. The Director may refer signage proposals to the ARC if there are concerns that a particular design is out of character with the sign program. 15. Mechanical equipment shall be located internally to buildings. With submittal of working drawings, the applicant shall include sectional views of buildings, which clearly show the PN'/-tic Resolution No. (2009 Series) _ — Attachment $ Page 5 sizes of proposed condensers and other mechanical equipment to be placed on the roof to confirm that parapets and other roof features will adequately screen them. A line of site diagram may be needed to confirm that proposed screening will be adequate. 16. The required fire risers for buildings shall be located internal to buildings. Other fire department equipment shall be located internal to buildings where feasible. The externally mounted Fire Department Connection (FDC) for buildings shall have a chrome or brass finish to the approval of the Community Development Director. 17. The applicant shall prepare an archaeological monitoring plan for the seismic upgrade and remodel projects for the Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings. Consistent with the Archaeological Resource Preservation Program Guidelines, the plan shall include provision for a qualified archaeologist and Native American site monitor to be present during construction activities. If excavations encounter significant paleontological resources, archaeological resources or cultural materials, then construction activities shall cease until the extent of the resource is determined and appropriate protective measures are approved by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall be notified of the extent and location of discovered materials so that they may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist. If pre-historic Native American artifacts are encountered, a Native American monitor should be called in to work with the archaeologist to document and remove the items. Disposition of artifacts shall comply with state and federal laws and pertinent EIR mitigation measures. 18. To the extent feasible, healthy mature tress shall be reused within the project as indicated on the conceptual landscaping plan. Detailed landscaping and grading plans that accompany building permit plans shall confirm proposals for the retention and relocation of existing trees and provide for tree protection measures to be in place during project construction to the approval of the City Arborist and Public Works and Community Development Directors. 19. Tree protection measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Arborist. The City Arborist shall review and approve the proposed tree protection measures prior to commencing with any demolition, grading, or construction. The City Arborist shall approve any safety pruning, the cutting of substantial roots, or grading within the dripline of trees. A city-approved arborist shall complete safety pruning. Any required tree protection measures shall be shown or noted on the building plans. Contact the City Arborist at 781-7023 to review and to establish any required preservation measures to be included with the building permit submittal. 20. A tree protection bond or surety shall be provided to the city prior to demolition, construction, and/or tree relocations to the satisfaction of the City Arborist, Public Works Director, and Community Development Director. The surety amount shall be established in accordance with current standards for evaluating tree value. 21. All new or relocated trees shall be installed per City Engineering Standards. Existing trees to remain shall be upgraded to include a tree well and grate per City Engineering Standard #8130 where determined feasible by the City Arborist. p�7� � q" 1q3.. 1 , Resolution No. (2009 Series) Page 6 Attachment 8 22. All underlying lots shall be merged or lot lines shall otherwise be adjusted prior to building permit issuance if required by the Building Division and/or Planning Division. Contact the Planning Division to initiate the Lot Merger, Lot.Line Adjustment, or"subdivision process. 23. Encroachments into or construction staging within the public right-of-way will require notification of the affected businesses prior to the commencement of each phase of construction and demolition to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 24. The historic granite curbing located along the Palm Street frontage shall be salvaged and incorporated into the final public improvements to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 25. The existing curb ramp located at the southeast corner of Palm and Chonro serves the pedestrian load from this development and shall be upgraded per ADA and City Engineering Standards. Any street paving, utility relocations or upgrades related to this installation shall be completed by the developer. 26. The project shall comply with the Engineering Standards in effect at the time of building permit submittal. The city expects that new standards relating to street furniture may be in effect at the time of building permit application. These aesthetic standards include but are not limited to public benches, matching trash/recycle receptacles, ganged newsracks, tree grates, and pedestrian level lighting fixtures. 27. The project shall include pedestrian level lighting fixtures and the required appurtenances and infrastructure per City Engineering Standard#7915 and the approved downtown lighting plans. Existing cobra head fixtures shall be removed unless otherwise deemed necessary for pedestrian and/or vehicle safety by the Public Works Director. 28. A properly sized underground grease interceptor shall be provided for any commercial kitchen in the project. This interceptor must be placed to allow convenient access by service vehicles, including grease interceptor pumping trucks. 29. Facilities shall be provided to allow restaurant equipment washing, including but not limited to: floor mats, trash cans, etc. Washing facility shall be covered and connected to sanitary sewer, and not be allowed to be discharged to the storm drain or surrounding environment. 30. Manifolds for multiple water meters shall be used to the maximum extent to reduce the number of water services in the street right-of-way (example: the two water services located in front of building D). Depending on the meter sizes required at each location, six meters utilizing one-2" service may not be possible (see City Standard 6260). 31. Each individually-owned commercial unit shall have an individual water meter. Each residential unit shall have an individual water meter. Separate landscape meters for commercial properties should be considered. Building A has eight meters shown. Explain the need for eight meters to serve the hotel and related facilities. p t q Resolution No. (2009 Series) _ - Attachment 8 Page 7 32. All existing water services that will not be used shall be properly abandoned per City standards. 33. Prior to issuance of construction permits, a final detailed plan of the trash and recycling rooms, including number and type of bins, and adequate capacity for the different solid waste and recyclables shall be submitted to the City's solid waste coordinator and the local garbage company for final review and approval. This plan shall be consistent with the draft solid waste management plan that accompanied project design plans and also identify areas for storage of fats, oils and grease, and any other waste expected to be generated by restaurant(s) or other types of tenants within the project. 34. The applicant shall submit utility plans during the building permit review process that clearly identify both private and public sewer system details and the point of connection at City main. If any existing laterals are reused, a CCTV inspection will be required and shall be submitted to the Building Department during the Building Permit Review Process. All unused sewer laterals shall be identified and abandoned at the City main. On motion of , seconded by , and on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this day of , 2009. Mayor David F. Romero ATTEST: City Clerk Elaina Cano APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Jonathan Lowell G:\CD-PL.AMPRICCI\Chinatow \Resolutions\CC Resolution(final desgin review 11-17-09).doc Pf4 4I c o u n a l m E m o Ra n o u m DATE: November 17, 2009 R E C 2 1 a i!a E TO: City Council NOV 17 2009 VIA: Ken Hampian, City Manager SLO CITY CLERK FROM: John Mandeville, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Public Hearing Item No. 4; Chinatown Project at 861 Palm (ARC 30-09) Attached is a memo prepared by staff responding to specific questions posed by Councilmember Carter regarding the Chinatown Project public hearing on tonight's Council agenda. Please call Pam Ricci at extension#7168 (781-7168) if you have any questions. OARD CoPf E hMRzL- 2ftOUNCIL E'CDD DIR fi0&-rtfCk, 71N DIR RED FILE L-2'`FIRE CHIEF - B M71NG AGENDA T3TTORNEY [�Tw DIR Q CLERK/ORIG 12 POLICE CHF DATE-,1 ra o ITEM # C 6EPt HEADS O"REC DIR —�-- LT-UTIL DIR CTHR DIR_ � NC.J Tlh��,5 –C,�uNeiL AC-2 — eccntL Cly! Of SM JUIS OBISW Department of Community Development Planning Division November 17, 2009 TO: City Manager & City Council FROM: Pam Ricci, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Chinatown Project; 861 Palm Street (ARC 30-09) Councilmember Carter had the following questions for City staff via e-mail. For the benefit of him and the other members of the Council, staff offers the following responses. 1) What is staffs assumption (or knowledge) about the materials used .in the original Quintana Block building? I'm assuming the quoins and window fenestration were stone/block of some sort. Is that staffs assumption as well? Was the rest of it stucco or also stone/block? Staff's Response: From reviewing old photographs and historic reports, exterior walls were cement plaster over the brick. Some of the original quoins are still present and they are cement plaster not stone. When the Monterey Street facade was tom down in 1913 there was a Tribune article that mentioned how solid the masonry was, but acknowledging that it was not stone. The replacement fagade on Monterey Street was much less ornamental and did not include the quoins, hooded and triangular pediments and roofline dentil work present on the old facade. 2) Why is a crosswalk on Palm between the Palm St. Garage and the West Pedestrian Walk not being required at the start? (I realize the EIR does call for on-going study and perhaps a future requirement for a crosswalk.) Staffs Response: Motorists expect to see pedestrians at downtown intersections so that is the preferred location for them to cross the street. Mid-block crosswalks should only be installed at locations that meet warrants which include high pedestrian traffic volumes. A mid-block crosswalk has not been required of the project because it may not be needed given pedestrian volumes and circulation patterns generated by the project. After the project is built and studies are conducted, the City will have a better understanding of the project's impact to determine if and where a mid-block crosswalk is warranted. Carter Memo—861 Palm Street(ARC 30-09) Page 2 3) Which retail space will include the Sauer Bakery oven and what will be the procedures for guaranteeing public access? Staffs Response: The retail space with the oven is shown on Sheet 9 and is the 2,600 square-foot space of Building B-2. With the review of tenant improvement plans for this retail space, Planning staff would review how the oven would be incorporated into the design and assure that it was open to the space so that customers could view it. Page 1 of 1 Council,SloCity From: Justesen,Erik P.[EPJustesen@rrmdesign.coml Sent: Mon 11/16/2009 8:55 AM To: Council,SloCity Cc: Subject Support for Chinatown Project Attachments: Good morning Council members, I recently had visitors from out of town.We spent part of the day walking around downtown enjoying the incredible weather and lovely ambiance.They commented on how beautiful the city and surroundings are and wondered how SLO has been able to find the right balance between too much and just right.I shared with them the background on a number of projects that have hit this delicate balance over the years and the upcoming Chinatown project.As I was explaining this latest addition to the downtown I relayed how carefully we review and work together with applicants to create the best project we can.That we have a vision for what the downtown can be and we keep this vision in mind as a guide to vet each opportunity-As I shared the aspects of the latest Chinatown program,they were literally awestruck with the investment being made and the care to fit it into the SILO environment.That a developer would take so much time and collaborate with the City for the betterment of the town,seemed unusual to them. They said,you live in an incredible place and we can't wait to come back and stay at the downtown hotel when it is finished. I have followed this project since Mark and Tom first rolled it out years ago.It is clear they have the City's best intentions in mind.They have deftly responded to community input,changes to the economy and most of all,crafted a physical place that will truly enhance our downtown for our citizens and visitors.It is very impressive and we are lucky to have a family like the Copelands willing to make the kind of investments and commitments they have made in our downtown and continue to make. I can't make it to the podium Tuesday night,so I will give you my full support to the Chinatown project in this email and urge you to approve it as well. Sincerely, All = RED FILE y &-COUNCIL :19�-f DD DIR Erik Justesen �6 W�/M� N DIR - MEETING AGENDA C�A6ft9^scru *"scRE CHIEF DATE /�� ITEM # �H L�ATTORNEY DIRC3ZLERK/ORIG LICE CHF Erik P.7ustesen,ASLA LEED AP ? ❑ DEPT HEADS CDIR cEo ! L DIR HDIR t rrmdesigngroup � ``�`� 3765 S.Higuera St,Ste.102 C Lee4c_ San Luis Obispo,CA 93401 P:(805)543-1794 1 F:(805)543-4609 v�rv�v.rrmdggign.com IIF---ii Please consider the environmentmRECEIVED t-��before printing this e- all 1 l E C E I V E NOV 16 2009 SLO CITY CLERK https:Hmail.slocity.org/exchange/slocitycounciUInbox/Support%20for%2OChinatown%2... 11/16/2009 RED FILE MEETING AGENDA DATE- ITEM # mOLM MEMORANDUM November 16, 2009 1-W9 copy 6-i A11- I E t,OU`CIL C�CDD DIR E;;- 0 CSM ntG 2 [a'FIN DIR To: Council Members 2-FIRE CHIEF L2-AT70RNEY ZPW DIR �p From: Elaina Cano, Interim CiClerk C`CLERK/ORIG D'PCLICE CHF ty !✓" ' DC%PT HEADS d'REC DIR ZUTIL DIR Via: Ken Hampian,City Manager -- Q HR Dirk aEW rrm Es iCeou UCf L 'eFry �'tG2 Subject: Communication Item Regarding Minutes Ct[rt�e Attached is an email from Council Member Carter alerting the Council to his planned Communication Item tonight, whereby he shall ask that additional information be included in the Council meeting minutes. If Council shares the concern,I shall be happy to"recalibrate"the length of minutes to strike a more satisfactory acceptable balance-drafting minutes is more art than science,and no two Clerk's will have exactly the same style. However, staff strongly wishes to retain our practice in recent years of preparing"action minutes,"and not return to summary minutes. Therefore, I though it would be helpful to understand the rational behind taking action minutes. First,action minutes are more efficient-which is important in an environment where staff has been reduced, including in the City Clerk's Office. Action minutes also tend to avoid the phenomenon of minutes progressively expanding to document the arguments leading to a decision-with pressures to expand arguments to promote various individual positions. For these reasons,the City adopted a practice of Council action minutes several years ago. In fact,back in January the City Clerk's office conducted a training with Advisory Body Liaisons. One of the topics that were discussed and agreed upon was the process of taking action minutes vs. summary minutes. It was the hope that this process would be"streamlined"with all Commissions, Committees and Boards throughout the organization. On the other hand,having an accurate record is of course vitally important. Because we are now keeping DVD copies of the Council meetings permanently and because the DVD's are so readily available, staff felt that the ability to trace back detailed arguments leading to a decision is preserved, without the inefficiency and debate created by a practice of summary minutes. The recommendations of advisory bodies are, of course,a part of the Council public record and easy to trace,too. I have attached an email from Audrey explaining the gist of Action Minutes as well as the excerpts from the"Guide to Effective Notices, Agendas and Minutes Preparation"that the Clerk's office prepared and abides by when creating the minutes. RECEIVED y-� Please let me know if you have any additional questions or concerns. RECEIVE D Thanks, NOV 17 1009 Elaina SLO CITY CLERK- GA301-04 Minutes\Memo to Council-Action Minutes.DOC Page 1 of 1 Cano, Elaina From: Carter, Andrew Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:02 PM To: Council ALL Cc: Hampian, Ken; Lowell, Jonathan P; Cano, Elaina Subject Requested Minutes Changes At our Council meeting on Tuesday, I will be requesting the following changes to the 10/20/09 minutes. 1) Page C1-7, sentence following"end of public comments,"change to read as follows: "Council discussion ensued during which Council discussed the potential positives and negatives of the State relinquishing Highway 227 to the City." I believe use of the current word "concems"connotes that there are only negatives. 2) Page C1-8, at the current end of first paragraph, add:"Council Members Ashbaugh, Carter, and Marx felt that the Council should follow through with its previously expressed desire for the State to relinquish Highway 227 to the City. These Council Members also believe that City control will facilitate achievement of the South Broad Street Plan." It seems odd to include only the negative arguments here and none of the positives. Andrew Carter Council Member City of San Luis Obispo 11/17/2009 _ Page 1 of 2 Hooper, Audrey From: Hooper, Audrey Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:59 PM To: Combs, Ron; Davidson, Doug; Elke, Brigitte; Fitzgerald, Linda; Girvin, Tim; Gribben, Roz; Hatley, Carol; Hook, Jeff Irons, Monica; Kiser, Betsy; Lawson, Dee; Mandeville, Peggy; Murry, Kim; Pellemeier, Keith; Ricci, Pam; Wallace, Christine; Webster, John Cc: Walter, Jay; Mandeville, John; Stanwyck, Shelly; Lowell, Jonathan P; Dietrick, Christine; Hampian, Ken; Betz, Ryan; Reynolds, Marti; Chippendale, Sue; Cano, Elaina; Bochum, Tim Subject: Action Minutes In 2006, during a training session with the City Attorney, I provided you with a manual that was entitled a"Guide to Effective Notices, Agendas and Minutes Preparation" that my office prepared. This Guide covered "summary" minutes, which is what I have been preparing for the City Council for the last few years. However, after speaking with some of our liaisons and other staff, looking at the history of minutes in the Clerk's office, and considering ways to streamline our processes, I believe it's time to update this Guide to include instructions for preparing "action" minutes. I will be doing that within the next few weeks. In the meantime, I would like to encourage each of you, if you are not already doing so, to prepare"action" minutes for your advisory bodies instead of summary minutes. (I came across a document that our former City Clerk, Lee Price, prepared sometime back about action minutes, in which she indicates that it is the"City's practice to prepare 'action' minutes." I'm not sure how that practice was arrived at, but think I've seen a report or approval by Council somewhere approving this type of minutes way back when -I'll be researching this further in the next few days.) So, what are"action" minutes? The most important thing to know about action minutes is that they are meant to record the actions taken by the advisory body and direction provided to staff, but they are not meant to be a "record of discussion." A few basics: • Always include the names of the speakers (their cities of residence or affiliations should be included, if known, but not street addresses). • If a member of the public speaks on a non-agenda item, summarize very briefly the matter of concern. ("Mr. Smith expressed concern that the City's water and sewer fees are too high.") • Indicate whether speakers support or oppose the recommendation or project. (If, because of the nature of the subject, you feel strongly that a reason must be shown as to why they oppose a project—you do not need to do this if they support it—then keep it very simple and concise: "Mr. Smith opposed the project because of traffic concerns.") • If a statement is read and submitted "for the record,"your minutes should so note and indicate that the statement"is on file in the xx office." (Avoid attaching documents to your minutes. We keep the ones submitted at Council_ riate agenda packet.) Indicate whether your advisoryem ers spoke in support of or opposition to the recommendation. If they r support the recommendation, there is no reason to include commentary. If they oppose the recommendation, a very brief statement should be made as to the reason why. (Again, Council Member Jones opposed the project because it will result in a loss of open space • nude raat ae nc u e your advisory body membersquestions forme puoncs) or stag's responses: .. If an advisory body member states that a comment is"for the record," you should include that verbatim (or as closely to verbatim as possible). • Motions should always be included (as closely to verbatim as possible). • During the advisory body commenttreport period, a brief statement indicating that"Member Smith reported on his attendance at the recent League of'Califomia Cities Conference" is usually adequate. As mentioned, I will work on modifying the 2006 Guide and will send you a copy in the near future. In the meantime, for those of you who are not doing action minutes already, I hope this quick summary is helpful and that you'll commit to making a change in the near future. If you have some questions, either give me a call or you can raise them when Elaina and I give our update at the 1/15/2009 Page 2 of 2 beginning of the training tomorrow afternoon. See you there! Audrey 1/15/2009 i section 3. RequiREB meetinc notices • Must post a Notice of Adjournment within 24 hours after the meeting at or near the door of the place where the meeting was held (Exhibit B). • Must post a Notice of Adjournment within 24 hours due to lack of quorum at the time the meeting was to have been held (also prepare an Affidavit of Posting) (Exhibit C). • Must post a Notice of Continued Public Hearing within 24 hours after the meeting at or near the door of the place where the meeting was held (Exhibit D). • Must post and send a Notice of Special Meeting with Special Meeting agenda to each member and to the press 24-hours before the meeting (Exhibit E). Must keep copies of Notices and Affidavits of Posting on file in accordance with Records Retention Schedule. See reference materials for examples. section 4. puBtic heaRinq notices Public hearing notices vary depending on the subject matter. Hearings may be State- mandated (those having a financial or environmental impact on property or business owners) and/or mandated by local law (Charter, adoption of the budget; ordinance, situations involving a property right or other entitlement). In 1990, Council adopted Resolution No. 6779 (Exhibit F) establishing notification requirements for a variety of Council and Community Development hearings. A word of caution! The attached notification requirements and guidelines are meant to assist liaisons in preparing the proper public hearing notices. However, it is incumbent on the staff liaison to be familiar with noticing requirements that may not be included in these exhibits. Questions regarding public hearing notices should be directed to the City Attorney or City Clerk. section 5. the minutes Keeping a complete and accurate record of City Council, advisory body and other meetings of legislative committee proceedings is vital - minutes are the history and legal record of the City. Minutes are a record of all actions and proceedings and document that the City Council and advisory bodies have complied with the law or rules by which it is governed. The information contained in the minutes, which comprise the official record of the meeting, may be treated as evidence in a court of law. Original City Council minutes are filed with the City Clerk. Advisory body and other minutes are kept by the appropriate department. Minutes are part of the City's official permanent records. Guide to Effective Agenda&Minutes Preparation Page 4 City of San Luis Obispo Form and Content of Meeting Minutes Standard Format Use of a standardized format is important for uniformity of minute entries and to save time in composing the record. A template based on the agenda should be developed for this purpose. (Exhibit G) Jurisdictional Matters At a minimum, minutes should contain the following information so it is clear what the they pertain to: 1. Date, hour and place of meeting. 2. The type of meeting, i.e. regular, adjourned regular, special, adjourned special. 3. The names of Council, advisory body or other committee members in attendance. If a member arrives late or departs before adjournment, the minutes should reflect the time of arrival and/or departure at that point in the minutes. In addition, the minutes should acknowledge staff members seated at the staff table, making presentations or responding to questions/comments. (Other staff members present at the meeting are not acknowledged in the minutes.) 4: If the meeting was a joint session with another agency, this fact is indicated in the heading of the minutes, and the members in attendance noted. Approval of Previous Minutes Although there is no legal requirement that minutes be approved by the City Council, advisory body or other legislative committee, the minutes will be placed on the agenda for approval, since it lends further weight to the accuracy and completeness of the record. Copies of the minutes will be provided in the agenda packet to allow for sufficient time for review. When approved as written, or as amended, the minutes then become the official record and are signed by the City Clerk or department liaison/designee. The minutes of a joint session with another agency are also signed by the appropriate person from each agency. Content of the Record The style of the minutes is referred to as "action" minutes, where the emphasis is on recording formal actions (motions, seconds, and votes). Action minutes are meant to be a record of the actions take by the advisory body and direction provided to staff. They are not meant to be a record of the discussion. Practice dictates that the following general guidelines be used in composing action minutes: 1. Record the beginning and ending times of all recesses. Guide to Effective Agenda&Minutes Preparation Page 5 City of San Luis Obispo 1 I f 2. Record member absences from any portion of the meeting, including beginning and ending times. Record in the roll call section arrival or departure time if a member arrives after the meeting is called to order or is excused before adjournment. 3. Motions and direction should always be included and should be stated as close to verbatim as possible. 4. Aside from the record of formal actions (motions/direction), indicate whether members spoke in support of or opposition to the recommendation. If they support the recommendation, there is no reason to include commentary. If they oppose the recommendation, a very brief statement as to why should be included. (If the discussion is lengthy, the topics covered may be listed.) 5. If a member indicates that his/her remarks are 'for the record," those comments should be entered verbatim or as Gose to verbatim as is reasonable for clarity. 6. Public speakers are identified by name and either their City of residence or their representation of an organization. If they are speaking on non-agenda items, summarize in one sentence, if possible, their concerns, requests, or suggestions. If they are speaking on agenda items, indicate whether they support or oppose the recommendation. (In rare cases there may be a reason to include a very concise statement as to why they oppose a project. Commentary should not be included if they support the recommendation.) If a large number of individuals testify and the testimony is largely redundant, the record may only contain the names of the individuals, their city of residence or representation, and their position in support of or opposition to the matter being discussed. 7. Acknowledge staff presenters by name and title. Similarly acknowledge consultants, also including the name of their firm/company. 8. Questions and staffs responses do not need to be a part of the record. If they result in member direction, it is the direction that should be recorded. Public Hearings Written evidence produced at hearings: Make appropriate reference to any written evidence in the form of statements, affidavits, reports, photographs, maps, correspondence, or other objects filed at the hearing, and included as part of the record. (Indicate, "On file in office.") Oral testimony: Identify by name all persons who testify and whether testimony was for or against the hearing subject; again, include their city of residence or representation of an organization or company. Findings: Usually the findings made by the City Council or advisory body with respect to public hearings are incorporated in a resolution (or ordinance) adopted as a result of the hearing. When this is done, the minutes need not record these findings in the body of the minutes, but shall refer to the resolution or ordinance voted upon by the City Council or advisory body. Guide to Effective Agenda&Minutes Preparation Page 6 City of San Luis Obispo - council memolzanOum crty o f san Luis osispo, city council_ ^__ __._ — _ _! RED FILE j � ��Y PoL DATE: November 10, 2009 MEETING AGENDA NCIL u CDD DIR DATEf 7 01 ITEM #�flB dc`t''"162 FIN DIR [!rAG'eAsrc1111Ue- Et-FIRE CHIEF TO: City Council RrATTORNEY p"PW DIR O'CLERWRIG 3-POLICE CHF y 0 DEPT HEADS ff REC DIR FROM: David F. Romero a-_eL6p�UTIL DIR SR SUBJECT: Communication Item—California Space Center — n� ,ate �HR DIR For the past several years I have been closely following the preliminary planning for a space center facility to be located near the main gate at Vandenberg Air Force Base on a 77-acre site formerly occupied by a trailer park, a site which is now no longer used for residential purposes. The Space Center will include a Visitor's Complex, containing an interpretive center, heritage exhibit, rocket park and picnic area, large-format theater, launch viewing, Native American cultural center, outdoor amphitheater, climate change exhibit, and a"Great Observatories" exhibit space. The Center will also include a Youth Education Facility to encourage students to study science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), and will include space classrooms, an experimental laboratory, statewide school and after-school programs, Saturday/summer enhancement camps, K-12 teach professional development; and an Exploratorium. The Center will include a Lifelong Learning Facility which will provide integrated adult/lifelong learning study areas, adult classroom space, computer and scientific laboratory sites, and technical and space-related local workforce training. There will be a Conference Center that will include an auditorium with state-of-the-art audio-visual capability, a banquet facility, and break- out and small group rooms. Also planned is a Mission Support Complex to support a variety of government and commercial requirements.. Overall, the Space Center Complex is expected to produce a total economic impact from operations of$2.37 billion over 12 years, with a direct and indirect job creation of 2994 jobs. It would also generate taxes in the magnitude of$235 million dollars within the next 12 years. This will be a world-class facility that will attract many visitors to the carefully planned center. It will also have a very beneficial effect on the Central Coast. In fact, a number of consultants who have been working on this project are from San Luis Obispo. In my capacity as Mayor, I have written a letter of support regarding the Space Center. However, it would also be helpful if the City Council would adopt a Resolution of Support (joining several other cities). If the Council is receptive, I would request that staff be directed to prepare such a resolution and present it for Council action at a future Council meeting. For your information, I have placed in the Council Reading File a recent brochure describing the Space Center, as well as a copy of last year's conceptual master plan. GACouncil Support&Corresp\City Council Correspondence\Romero\Communication Items\Communication Item-California Space Center.doc l(Z Words � y Jenny Ferguson, Watersmart, Rainwater Harvesting Systems rl/l� I come again this evening to respectfully request that Council prioritize introducing legislation for rainwater harvesting and fill the void currently there for public administrators and citizens. Knowing the resource constraints on the city, I do not come emp -handed tonight. I come prepared with a very specific request, with ee a�hanges to legislation that will facilitate rainwater harvesting in this city as a safe and reliable 'auxiliary supply' fop emi;ei - rainwater harvesting is both an environmentally and fiscally attractive auxiliary supply for our city. (My thesis covered these issues in detail which you can access from my website www.watersmart.biz). There are a multitude of ways to achieve legislation for RHS in SLO, but I chose the easiest one for examination and implementation by the city—a Californian version, drafted by the Ca department of Health that has already been vetted for fitting in with existing Ca water legislation. The focus is on amending the definition of'recycled water and 'auxiliary supply' as defined by the CCR so that rainwater harvesting would readily fit under that heading. Although this legislation normally refers to public agencies dealing w/ recycled water—Ca Dept of Health are incorporating references to the UPC (which is generally considered the code for plumbing inside residences) & domestic greywater use. This legislation appears readily adaptable for private citizen's rainwater harvesting. Redefining 'recycled water also fits in beautifully with Council's approval of the Awahnee principles in 2005 which also referred to "maximizing the use of recycled water". I believe the Council has the ability to create an ordinance adopting these amendments locally; and that the Council could direct the city, by ordinance, to evaluate rainwater harvesting systems according to these amendments. In particular, in the words of title 17, that rainwater harvesting as an auxiliary supply be accepted as an additional source by the water supplier& health agency. I respectfully ask the Council to do so. Title 17 details: "The water supplier, however, shall not be responsible for abatement of cross-connections which may exist within a users premises. As a minimum, the evaluation should consider:the existence of cross- connections, the nature of materials handled on the property, the probability of a backflow occurring, the degree of piping system complexity and the potential for piping system modification. Special consideration shall be given to the premises of the following types of water users: (b) Premises having an auxiliary water supply, unless the auxiliary supply is accented as an additional source by the water supplier and is approved by the health agency." ;or (q"Water Supplier' is the person who owns or operates the public water system. (g)"Health Agency" means the California Department of Health Services, or the �` local health officer with respect to a small water system. Full supply costs Direct Details Fiscal Costs Moving and processing.:potable water to and from consumer Providing, maintaining, upgrading and expanding infrastructure' Capital costs including rinci f and interest payments Energy Costs Moving and processing_potable water sources_ in kWh Movin and i5rocessing wastewater Full costs Details Indirect Opportunity Loss of opportunity when focusing on meeting increasing demands at sake of full investigation Costs of alternative supply models. ._._...__..-_--------------..____._----......_ RHSs reduce requirement for catchment-based drinking water—lost opportunity for less pressure on watershed and its eco-systems Use of in-situ residential water catchments reduces requirement for storm water drainage and costs Loss of benefits of users being directly connected to their water supply and consequences of over consumption The potential increased resiliency of RHSs to climate change/reduced rainfaII2 Cost of being compelled to use lower quality water sources with limited choice of water supply options. "Less costly treatment options can be used when water utilities start with higher quality source waters, and water supply reliability can simultaneously be enhanced."(Ca. Dept. of Water Resources,2005) Less mixing of higher and lower quality waters which facilitates"appropriately matching high quality source waters can reduce the levels of pollutants and pollutant precursors that cause health concerns in drinking.water'._.(Ca Dept. of Water Resources, 2005)__ Fire, earthquake—potential of electricity down and water supplies cut off due to electrical pumps being inoperative Drought—"Overall, the best positioning that SLO County could achieve with regard to planning for droughts is to develop multiple sources of water as opposed to relying on few sources to meet our water needs." (SLO County Water Resources, 2008 Externalities _Environmental impacts of energy _(eg. emissions)_ _ Overall costs of relying on'others'energy sources to keep our'necessities for survival'viable —the enormous power of sustainable choices Costs of'over-use'of current water supply sources(eg land subsidence with over drafting .aquifers,watershed degradation etc)-alternative sources of supply reduce,pressure Environmental and economic costs of saline added to water.3 Less saline added to water systems with increased use of'soft'rainwater It is difficult to fully assess the costs associated with maintaining existing systems and the costs of leaking and old infrastructure. The California Performance Review(2004) cited a report by the Public Policy Institute of California estimating the state's'water supply and wastewater treatment systems maintenance backlog'to be about$40 billion. (California Department of Water Resources(John Andrew), 2004) 2 Research indicates that when considering climate change, RHSs may offer a more resilient urban water supply that is less susceptible to failure with"catchments exhibit(ing)a disproportionate decrease in yield in response to rainfall reductions, as compared to rainwater tanks...this may be, at least in part, due to the pervious nature of catchments that generally require significant re-wetting following reduced rainfall in order to generate appreciable runoff(whereas)..roof catchments are highly impervious and largely immune to the hysteresis exhibited by catchments in runoff generation ." �Coombes& Barry, 2007) Water high in salinity can cause economic costs through damages to plumbing and fixtures and water-using devices and equipment. One study, conducted in 1998 by the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Metropolitan Water District(MWD), found that for every 100 mg/L decrease in salinity, there is an economic benefit of$95 million annually to MWD's customers" (Ca. Dept. of Water Resources, 2005) WatersmarLbiz 1 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO NOTES ON LEGISLATIVE CHANGES FOR SLO FOR RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEMS (RHS) RHS SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE PRIVATE WELLS From J. Ferguson's thesis • Categorizing RHSs in a similar way as'private wells'which are non-public, not subject to the same legislative parameters as public water supplies, lie outside the jurisdiction of the SDWA and are'self-monitored' systems. This approach indicates a 'softer' regulatory approach with residents being provided with recommended practices and standards issued by administrators rather than regulation and oversight of private systems by public administrators. • The exception is in the area of backflow,prevention when connected to public water supply (PWS). 1/Mandate backflow prevention devices to protect mains water supply when a connection to PWS exists and 2/1abel pipes used for rainwater if the dwelling also has pipes exclusively using PWS to avoid cross-contamination issues. (p27-28 of thesis) EP RAINWATER HARVEST414G IS RECYCLED WATER Water Recycling Law' on recycled water. §10616.5. Recycled water"means the reclamation and reuse of wastewater for beneficial use.) Water Code, Division 7. Water Quality, Chapter 2. Definitions: (n) Recycled water"means water which, as a result.of treatment of waste, is suitable for a direct beneficial use or a controlled use that would not otherwise occur and is therefore considered a valuable resource. Chapter 7.5. Water Recycling Act of 1991 §13575. Recycling Act title:"Recycled water'has the same meaning as defined in subdivision in)of Section 13050. Important note: As harvested rainwater has not entered a domestic building, it cannot be said to 'contain domestic waste' & is therefore considered not required to be treated to tertiary standards (drinking water standards)under Title 22(see section below all of Chapter 3 will not apply).. CCR Tide 22,Div.4, Ch 3,Article 2.Sources of Recycled Water.§60302.Source specifications. The requirements in this chapter shall only apply to recycled water from sources that contain domestic waste,in whole or in part. RHS IS CURRENTLY AN 'AUXILIARY SUPPLY': TITLE 17 CCR Division 1.State Department of Health Services, Chapter 5.Sanitation(Environmentaq, Group 4.Drinking Water Supplies,Article 1.General. §7583_Definitions In addition to the definitions in Section 4010.1 of the Health and Safety Code,the following terms are defined for the purpose of this Chapter: (b)"Auxiliary Water Supply" is any water supply other than that received from a public water system. Watersmart.biz 2 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO UNDER PROPOSED CCR AMENDMENTS: RHS IS STILL 'AUXILIARY SUPPLY' Section 64750,14,Auxiliary Water Supply. "Auxiliary water supply"means any source of water that does not meet the definition in section 64750.12 that is either used or equipped to be used as a water supply and located on,or piped to,the premises of a water user.(The term"emuimxd"in this definition means that appurtenances such as inactive wells,pumps,power supply.intakes,suction lines,pipelines, connection fittings,or storage tanks are in place and readily available for use.) NOTE:Authority cited:Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375.Health and Safety Code. Reference:Section 116375.Health and Safety Code. F.Y.I. Section 64750.12.Aoproved Water Supply. "Approved water supply"means a water source that has been approved by the Department for domestic use and designated as such in a domestic water supply permit,pursuant to section 64254. NOTE:Authority cited:Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375,Health and Safety Code. Reference:Section 116375,Health and Safety Code. LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT FOR THE PROCESS Relevant statements in 'Water Recycling Lain on recycled water: #1: Duty of City: "to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use". Specs: (WATER CODE,DIVISION 6. CONSERVATION,DEVELOPMENT,AND UTILIZATION OF STATE WATER RESOURCES Part 2.6. Urban Water Management Planning Chapter 3 Urban water mgt.plans. §10633. INFORMATION ON RECYCLED WATER (g)A plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier's service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use. #2: Water Recycling Law specifically supports landscape & indoor use of RHS: WATER CODE,DIVISION 6. CONSERVATION,DEVELOPMENT,AND UTILIZATION OF STATE WATER RESOURCES Part 2.6. Urban Water Management Planning Chapter 7 Reclamation §13512. LEGISLATIVE INTENTION It is the intention of the Legislature that the state undertake all possible steps to encourage development of water recycling facilities so that recycled water may be made available to help meet the growing water requirements of the state. §13552.2. LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS (a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the use of potable domestic water for the irrigation of residential landscaping is a waste or an unreasonable use of water within the meaning of Section 2 of Article X of the Califomia Constitution if recycled water, for this use, is available to the residents and meets the requirements set forth in Section 13550, as determined by the state board after notice and a hearing. §13553. USE OF RECYCLED WATER IN CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS (a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the use of potable domestic water for toilet and urinal flushing in structures is a waste or an unreasonable use of water within the meaning of Section 2 of Article X of the California Constitution if recycled water, for these uses, is available to the user and meets the requirements set forth in Section 13550,as determined by the state board after notice and a hearing. Watersmart.biz 3 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO CITIES CAN GO FURTHER & REQUIRE USE OF RHS §13552.4. AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE USE OF RECYCLED WATER FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING (a)Any public agency,including a state agency, city, county, city and county, district,or any other political subdivision of the state, may require the use of recycled water for irrigation of residential landscaping, if all of the following requirements are met.- (1) et:(1)Recycled water, for this use,is available to the user and meets the requirements set forth in Section 13550, as determined by the state board after notice and a hearing. (2) The use of recycled water does not cause any loss or diminution of any existing water right. (3) The irrigation systems are constructed in accordance with Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 60301)of Division 4 of Tile 22 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. (b) This section applies to both of the following: (1)New subdivisions for which the building permit is issued on or after March 15, 1994, or, if a building permit is not required, new structures for which construction begins on or after Manch 15, 1994, for which the State Department of Health Services has approved the use of recycled water. (2)Any residence that is retrofitted to permit the use of recycled water for landscape irrigation and for which the State Department of Health Services has approved the use of recycled water. PARTICULAR CHANGES RECOMMENDED Recycled water statutes&Regs avail At httpltwww.cdph.ca.gov/cerdicldhnkingwater/Pages/Lawbook.aspx Actions reauested by Council: 1/Direct the city to consider harvested rainwater as both 'recycled water &'auxiliary supply', or create an ordinance directing the city to do so. 2/Specifically, in accord with title 17, direct that rainwater harvesting as an auxiliary supply be accepted as an additional source by the water supplier& health agency. 3/Create an ordinance approving amendments to CCR as provided in "Dec 8,2005 draft" in whole, or in part as detailed below. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._......................._.......................... NOTES ON TITLE 22 & REQUESTED AMENDMENTS Current: Section 60301.700.Recycled Water Agency. "Recycled Water Agency"means the public water system,or a public or privately owned or operated recycled water system, that delivers or proposes to deliver recycled water to a facility. NOTE:Authority cited:Section 13521,Water Code. Reference: Sections 13520 and 13521,Water Code Effect: The section currently allows for'privately owned'systems:allowing for private residences RHS Proposed ARTICLE 5.Dual Plumbed Recycled Water Systems,Section 60315.Design Requirements. The public water supply shall not be used as a backup or supplemental source of water for a dual-plumbed recycled water system unless the connection between the two systems is protected by an air-gap separation which complies with the requirements of section 760(a)California Code of Regulations, and the approval of the public water system has been obtained. NOTE:Authority cited:Section 13521,Water Code. Reference:Sections 13521, 13523.1, 13553 and 13554,Water Code. Effect This amendment ties Title 22 into air-gap separation requirements of section 603.1.2 of the UPC. Watersmart.biz 4 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO Proposed' Section 60316.Operation Requirements. (a)Prior to the initial operation of the dual-plumbed recycled water system and ame 15,thereafter,the recycled water agency shall ensure that the dual-plumbed system within each facility and use area is inspected and tested for possible cross connections with the potable water system.Thereafter,the dual-plumbed system shall be inspected annually,Tha-and resysledFshall also-be tested for possible-cross connections at least once every four years unless the public water system or recycled water agency can document that there have been no plumbing changes in the dual-plumbed system.The testing for cross connections shall be conducted in accordance with the method described in the report submitted pursuant to section 60314.The inspections and the testing shall be performed by a cross connection control specialist certified by the Califomia-Nevada section of the American Water Works Association or an organization with equivalent certification requirements.A written report documenting the result of the inspection and testing€ff4h -paefyear-shall be submitted to the dDepartment within 30 days following completion of the testing. (b)The recycled water agency shall notify the dDepartment and the public water system of any cross connection,or any incidence of backflow from the dual-plumbed recycled water system into the potable water system on the user's premises within 24 hours of the discovery of the incident.The problem shall be corrected and the system retested before operation is resumed. Effect: This amendment allows for reduced inspections in certain reduced-risk scenarios(i.e. No plumbing changes) Proposed: Section 64750.14.Auxiliary Water Supply. "Auxiliary water sunply"means any source of water that does not meet the definition in section 64750 12 that is either used or gguipped to be used as a water supply and located on or piped to the premises of a water user.(The term" ui ped"in this definition means that amurtenances such as inactive wells,pumps,power supply,intakes,suction lines,pipelines, connection fittings.or storage tanks are in place and readily available for use. NOTE:Authority cited:Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375,Health andSafetyCode. Reference:Section 116375. Health and.Safety Code. Effect: This amendment allows specifically mentions'storage tanks',and so makes even more relevant to RHS Proposed: ARTICLE 5.Dual Plumbed Recycled Water Systems,Section 60315.Design Requirements. The public water supply shall not be used as a backup or supplemental source of water for a dual-plumbed recycled water system unless the connection between the two systems is protected by an air-gap separation which complies with the requirements of sectio^r 7602 (A) and "^X A)`4260(a)California Code of Regulations, and the approval of the public water system has been obtained. NOTE:Authority cited:Section 13 52 1,Water Code. Reference:Sections 13521, 13523.1, 13553 and 13554,Water Code. Effect: This amendment ties Title 22 into air-gap separation requirements of section 603.1.2 of the UPC. I. Watersmart.biz 5 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO Proposed: (5)Recycled Water or GFGY1FQftF(SOe gMYWRW defiRifiene Seefl-an-142:76 oft—he Ci—difiwa—is Water-Code) (A)Recycled water supply system that is Air gap separation 1.interconnected to a Piping system systSS)that contains water received from a PWS. 2.not interconnected to a piping system Reduced pressure principle contains water received from a PWS. (B)ReSidenees+rsiag FRecycled water in an appFoved" Plumbed use Double check valve ly used only for landscape irrigation in an approved dual-plumbed use area established pursuant to sections 60313 through 60316,which is used for 1.Individually owned residential units 2.Sites other than individually owned residential units Reduced pressure principle The water supplier shall not allow a lower level of protection than that designated. The water supplier may allow protection at one level lower than that designated,pursuant to subsection 64758(b). A lower level of protection may be allowed lif the recycled water supplier obtains the approval of the local public water supplier,or of the Department if the water supplier is also the supplier of the recycled water,.aAn approved alternative backflow protection plan may be usedshall be is-implemented that at a minimum includes annual inspections and annual shutdown est s of the recycled water and potable water systems to determine whether any cross connections exist. Effect: See next section to compare. Allows for minimal protection when lowest risk(associated with landscape irrigation only).Also provides for local public water supplier to allow a lower level of protection. Proposed: Section 64760.Standards for Types of Backflow Protection. (a)The water supplier shall ensure that each air-gap separation meets the requirements in section 603.1.2 of the Uniform Plumbing Code (b)The water supplier shall ensure that each installed pressure vacuum breaker,double check valve,and reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly: (1)Meets the requirements in this chapter, (2)Meets the applicable American Water Works Standards,as follows: (A)C512-99-Air Release,Air/Vacuum,and Combination Air Valves for Waterworks Service; (B)C511-97-Reduced-Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention Assembly;or (C)C510-97-Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Assembly and (3)is approved through laboratory and field evaluation tests performed by the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research of the University of Southern California or an entity with equivalent testing requirements. NOTE:Authority cited:Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375,Health and Safety Code. Reference:Section 116375,Health and Safety Code. Effect:. Updates standards, links in the UPC Watersmart.biz 6 Notes on Legislative Changes for SLO CURRENT CCR: TITLE 17:RELEVANT SECTIONS W/ RHS AS RECYCLED WATER _......_......._.._......----_._......._......._.........__...._.._........_......................._.........................................................................................__.........................._._. (c)Recycled water (1)Premises where the public water system is used to supplement the recycled water supply. AG (2)Premises where recycled water is used,other than as allowed in paragraph(3),and there is no interconnection with the potable water system. RP (3)Residences using recycled water for landscape irrigation as part of an approved dual plumbed use area established pursuant to sections 60313 through 60316 unless the recycled water supplier obtains approval of the local public water supplier,or the Department if the water supplier is also the supplier of the recyded water,to utilize an alternative backflow,protection plan that includes an annual inspection and annual shutdown test of the recycled water and potable water systems pursuant to subsection 60316(a). DC WATER CODE RELEVANT TO RHS AS RECYCLED WATER .. .................................._..................................................................................................................................................................................................................._.............................................................. Chapter 7, Reclamation, Article 4. Regulation §13555.3. Separate pipelines (a)Water delivery systems on private property that could deliver recycled water for nonpotable uses described in Section 13550, that are constructed on and after January 1, 1993, shall be designed to ensure that the water to be used for only potable domestic uses is delivered, from the point of entry to the private property to be served, in a separate pipeline which is not used to deliver the recycled water. (b)This section applies to water delivery systems on private property constructed within either of the following jurisdictions: (1)One that has an urban water management plan that includes the intent to develop recycled water use. (2)One that does not have an urban water management plan that includes recycled water use, but that is within five miles of a jurisdiction that does have an urban water management plan that includes recycled water use, and has indicated a willingness to serve the water delivery system. §13557. Regulation to safely plumb buildings with both potable and recycled water systems (a)On or before July 1, 2008, the department, in consultation with the State Department of Public Health, shall adopt and submit to the California Building Standards Commission regulations to establish.a state version of Appendix J of the Uniform Plumbing Code adopted by the.International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials to provide design standards to safely plumb buildings with both potable and recycled water systems. r -----D R A F T----- TITLE 17 (1) Repeal Section 7583 LG !f GGAwdkwy » PUbHO wateF SYS4effl- <G (AG)" f is a physiral break betweeft the supply line and a nese. . g esse-. "AJAIWA 9 is—An effieial stmdaM developed and approved by the G< ff sections;swivel er-ehmgee%,ef devises,eF other-deviees dweuo whieh bookfiew Oeuld . ,ftLG )f is aft assembly ef at least twe eek VaWe Assefab 6+ afthe eheele valve assembly and test eeeks avaitable for-testing the wateFtightfiess efeash PhPak vii've.. KHeafth f) f OF the GG 1f KReelaifned f uses e4her-than potable E14. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page l -----D R A F TMMMMM 6) u » • diffwpatigl relief valve leea4ed bePween the IA'A'A Pherk 4'Ak es,a 4&15,elesing shut e valve eR e—Reth sidde A-fabee eheek valve assembly,and equippedwM Reeessaf),test eeeks feF teStifkg. ccUSOF " user's cc „ ccWOteF , NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. (2) Repeal Section 7584 with the leeal health ageney, OF With another-ageae�,appFeved by the health agefley. The e"eAP;* (a) The establishment efa pFeeedufe of:system fer-testing bwkflew , pfeventem. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 2 -----D R A F T----® NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. (3) Repeal Section 7585 7.58-5,Evelvefien of hazard e", We the publie..raker n. st This ifielades weepted as an additienal sewee by the water-supplier-eAd is appfeved by the health (e) Premises haviRg a r-epeeAed his4ei3,efffOSS semeetiens being established er-Fe- NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. (4) Redesignate section 7586 as section 64756 in Title 22, Division 4: Chanter 18. Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control Article 2. Cross Connection Control Hazard Assessment Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 3 ----D R A F T'®.®®® Section qM 64756. User supervisor The health agency and water supplier may, at their discretion,require an industrial water user to designate a user supervisor when the water user's premises has a multipipmgI /\ system that convey various types of fluids, some of which may be hazardous and where changes in the piping system are frequently made. The user supervisor shall be responsible for the avoidance of cross-connections during the installation,operation and maintenance of the water user's pipelines and equipment! NOTE: Authority cited: Sections40B-aA44426100275,Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4826100275, Health and Safety Code. MrTrl `�P—2. DRQ4:E -gPjQ'AT OF. W,6J '.D e3j5;gPPA4 (5) Repeal Section 7601 BaGkfieW PFOVOMM Fequir-ed by this Ghapt@F shall have passed labefateFy and fie'd NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. (6) Repeal Section 7602 . (a) AiF gap SepaFatiea. An Air- gap Fags.(AG) shall be at West d....6ie the shall,diameter-ef the supply pipe, measwed veftieally"m the flood Fim efthe r-e ;e shall this Sep-afation ha IA,;,q than Aqe�;;G;h (b) Deable Cheek Valve Assembly. 24 FequiFed deuble ebeek-vaWe assembly(E)G) as a minifnem, shall,as a minifRuffl, eeafefffi to the NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026,Health and Safety Code. (7)Repeal Section 7603 Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 4 4 -----D R A F T---®- a (b) Peuble Cheek Valve Assembly. A deuble eheek valve assefably shall be le pessible,—and in -A mwn-neff where it is r-eadily aseessible fer-testing and . " ) side eleamnee. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. (8) Repeal Section 7604 supply Shall be eemmeaswate with the degFee of hazwd d*M exists en the eefisumef'-s level 4preteetien) inelades- Doi-hip Gheek Valve Assembly (PC),Redueed- PFe-sisur-a- Wi Y.aB-FIRMIRw ee D/ D\ ...i aR A: gap Ce «.i,. /A!`\ The the water- s 1- SkHMiem 4*14oh A-At eaver-ed ia:Pabie 1 shall he evalumed en a ease by ease basis Table 1 Type efgaelEflew PmteaieR Required 'legre (a) Sewage and 14&zffdeas Sebstwees (1)-1?reises whAferthere are waste rv$EAr-PeMPin ,4G 'Aetff SySte•^ This does net_ineludesingle family fesidetlee uhat haS a sewagelift pump. A RP he,-provided iR liege-e€an AG Wappreved lig---- (2) Wefnis t, L err-rrrnnxee�iVnAfEfl)8i:$El9F1S Skkl1$taf!@eS are handled in a4kG Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 5 -----D R A F T®-®®® This does :nom ei::de a single family residenee that has a sewage lift pufnp. An RP may be pmvided in Hou A-f—RRAG Wappfelved by the health ageRey mad-q.vateF sapplie� (3) efaises whefetho;o ffe k4gatien systems; We whieh DD feftilizm> > . (b) Au*iliaFy Water-Supplies (!) Wmise5•whefe there i supply r_ Supplier.. water.supl1 iieF' (e) Resyeled Wates (1) Premises wheFe the publiewa*F SySteffi is used te AG allowed in paFagFaph (3),emd thefe is no imefeennee4ieft with the potable water--System. as pan of an approved deal pluinbed use afea es4ablished pwrAwl—Fint to seesiRfts rveyeled water-and POtab!O WatOF.S�'SteffiS pursuant to subseetiwk 60316 (a). thepueater systefa and' tmappf;eved . xili i-y water ..ply An RP Enay be pr-evided in lieu efan AG if appr-eved by the andsupplier.. (9) PFefRiSeS WheFe the AM systefa is supplied fFefn the (4) Buildings where-the fire system is supplied�r the BC Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,1005 Page 6 .....D RAFT..... S),Swfn Wit-bin the same h, ilding. (1) Pier-hydmals for-supplying watef to vessels feF an)'PHFP@9O. (2) PFainiseswheretheseareFaarfae-amRties. E-P (0) PFemises where ertt ' is restricted se that inspeetiens€er eress RP dA NOTE: Authority cited: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code; and Section 13521, Water Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code;and Sections 13520, 13521 and 13554(a)(3), Water Code. (9) Repeal Section 7605 of this Chapter-. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 208 and 4026, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 4026, Health and Safety Code. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,1005 Page 7 .Illlmlll mmD R A F T1111111111111111111111111 Title 22 Chapter 3. Water Recycling Criteria Section 60301.700. Recycled Water Agency. "Recycled Water Agency"means the public water jg2ply system, or a public or privately owned or operated recycled water system,that delivers or proposes to deliver recycled water to a facility. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 13 52 1, Water Code. Reference: Sections 13520 and 13521, Water Code. ARTICLE 5. Dual Plumbed Recycled Water Systems Section 60315. Design Requirements. The public water supply shall not be used as a backup or supplemental source of water for a dual-plumbed recycled water system unless the connection between the two systems is protected by an air-gap separation which complies with the requirements of sections 647601a1 California Code of Regulations, and the approval of the public water system has been obtained. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 13521, Water Code. Reference: Sections 13521, 13523.1, 13553 and 13554, Water Code. Section 60316. Operation Requirements.. (a) Prior to the initial operation of the dual-plumbed recycled water system and anally themageF,the recycled water agency shall ensure that the dual-plumbed system within each facility and use area is inspected and tested for possible cross connections with the potable water system. Thereafter,the dual plumbed system shall be inspected annually,44*-and reeyeled WWOF shall alse be tested for possible cross connections at least once every four years unless the public water system or recycled water agency can document that there have been no plumbing changes in the dual-plumbed system. The testing for cross connections shall be conducted in accordance with the method described in the report submitted pursuant to section 60314. The inspections and the testing shall be performed by a cross connection control specialist certified by the California-Nevada section of the American Water Works Association or an organization with equivalent certification requirements. A written report documenting the result of the inspection and testing€erre pFiff yeaF shall be submitted to the Department within 30 days following completion of the testing. (b)The recycled water agency shall notify the 4bepartment and the public water system of any cross connection ,or any incidence of backflow from the dual-plumbed recycled water system into the potable water system,on the user's premises within 24 hours of the discovery of the incident. The problem shall be corrected and the system retestedbeforeoperation is resumed. Cross Connection Contra!Regrdations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 8 ®®®.®® R A F Twmmmm With seefieR 7-605 ef:Pkle 1:7,Galifemis Code . NOTE: Authority cited: Section 13521, Water Code. Reference: Sections 13521, 13553 and 13554, Water Code. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,1005 Page 9 ..._l.D R A F Ti.... Chapter 19& Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control ARTICLE 1. DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY. Section 64750.10. Air-Gap Separation. "Air-pp separation"means a physical vertical separation between the free flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and an open or non-pressurized receivingvessel. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.12. Approved Water Sunply. "Approved water supply"means a water source that has been approved by the Department for domestic use and designated as such in a domestic water supply permit, pursuant to section 64254. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 116375, Health and.Safety Code. Section 64750.14. Auxiliary Water Supply, "Auxiliary water supply"means any source of water that does not meet the definition in section 64750.12 that is either used,or equipped to be used,as a water supply and located on or piped to the premises of a water user. (The term"equipped"in this definition means that appurtenances such as inactive wells,pumps,power supRlly, intakes suction lines,pipelines,connection fittings,or storage tanks are in place and readily available for use.), NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375 Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 116375,Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.16. Backflow. "Backflow" means a reversal of flow caused by differential pressure in which any liquid, gas,or other substance enters the public water system. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375 Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 116375. Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.18. Backflow Prevention Assembly. "Backflow prevention assembly"means a device intended to prevent backflow. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375 Health and Safety Code Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 10 1 ®---® R A F Tmmmmm Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 6475010. Cross Connection. "Cross-connection"means any actual or potential unprotected connection or structural arrangement between a public water.system,or a piping system connected to the public water system and located on the premises of a water user,and any source or distribution system containing liquid, gas,or other substances not from an approved water supply. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 1163'75, Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.22. Cross-Connection Control Program Specialist. "Cross-connection control program specialist"means a person who is certified as a cross- connection control program specialist by the California—Nevada Section of the.American Water Works Association or an organization with equivalent certification requirements. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375,Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 6475014. Double Check Valve Assembly. "Double check valve assembly"means two independently-acting, internally-loaded, check valves with shut-off valves located upstream and downstream of the two check valves,and test cocks to enable field testing. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.25. Premises. "Premises"means the property under the ownership or control of the water user and served,or capable of being served, with water via a service connection with the public water system. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health andSafetyCode. Reference: Section 116375.Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.26. Pressure Vacuum Breaker Assembly, "Pressure vacuum breaker assembly"means the combination of an independently-acting, internally-loaded check valve and an indevendently-acting loaded air inlet valve located Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8.2005 Page 11 _____® R A F T---®- on its discharge side,with test cocks and shutoff valves attached at each end of the combination. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375. Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375. Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.27. Reduced Pressure Principle Assembly. "Reduced pressure principle assembly"means two independently-acting, internally- loaded check valves with an automatic differential-pressure relief valve located between, shut-off valves located upstream and downstream of the two check-valves,and test cocks to enable field testing. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 645750.28. Water Supplier. "Water supplier"means any person who owns or operates a public water system. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. % Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 64750.30. User's Service Connection. "User's service connection"means the point of connection of a water user's piping to the public water system. I NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375. Health and Safety Code. IReference: Section 116375,Health and Safety Code. Section 6475032. Water User. "Water user"means any person that is authorized to receive water from the public water system 1 NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 64754. Responsibility.. I A water supplier shall be responsible for protecting the public water system from backflow by complying with the requirements in this chapter. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 12 ----®D R A F T----- NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 2. CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL HAZARD ASSESSMENT Section 64755. Hazard Assessment. (a)To evaluate the potential for backflow into the public water system,each community water system shall conduct an initial field and/or office assessment of the premises within its service area and each noncommunity water system shall conduct an initial field assessment of its water distribution system. The assessment shall consider: (1)The existence of cross-connections: (2)The type and use of materials handled: and (3)The degree of piping system complexity and accessibility. (b) Subsequent to the initial assessment described in subsection (a) the community water system shall: (1)Conduct an assessment of the premises of each new water user connected to the public water system;and (2) Re-evaluate the premises of an existing water user if changes within the water user's premises or any backflow incidents occur. (c) Subsequent to the initial assessment described in subsection (a) the noncommunity water system shall re-evaluate its water distribution system if any changes or any backflow incidents occur. (d) Each hazard assessment shall be performed by a cross-connection control Program specialist unless the Department approves an alternative based on its review of system size,types of water users, treatment,distribution system and any previous hazard assessment. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 3. BACKFLOW PROTECTION SELECTION CRITERIA AND STANDARDS Section 64758. Tyne of Backflow Protection Readired. (a) Based on the results of the assessment conducted pursuant to section 64755 and using the hazard criteria specified in Table 64758 the water supplier shall determine the minimum backflow protection, if any,to install. A community water system shall ensure that the backflow protection is installed at the water user's service connection A Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 13 ----D R A F T----- noncommunity water system shall ensure that backflow protection is installed in a manner thatprotects the distribution system. (1)The types of backflow protection that may be used for meter protection are listed according to increasing level of protection as follows: Pressure vacuum breaker assembly,double check valve assembly, reduced pressure principal assembly,and air gap separation. Where there is no potential for backpressure,'such as roadway right of way irrigation systern, a pressure vacuum breaker assembly shall be considered more protective than a double check valve assembly. (2) If more than one of the hazard criteria applies to the premises of a water user,the criteria requiring the greatest degree of protection shall apply (b)The water supplier may allow protection at one level lower for the hazards designated in Table 64758 as having that option, subject to the Department's approval based on a review that includes the hazard involved,the water system's cross connection control program,the rationale and justification for proposing the lower level of protection,and the water system's compliance history related to cross connection control (c) If an assessment of a premises could not be made pursuant to section 64755 to determine the type of hazard present,the water supplier shall ensure that an air gap separation is installed. (d)If a hazardous situation exists on a water user's premises or in the public water system's distribution system that is not described in Table 64758 the water supplier shall ensure that an appropriate We of backflow protection is installed and notify the Department prior to installation. Table 64758. Hazard Criteria and Appropriate Types of Backflow Protection Hazard Re 'red Level of Notecdon 1 Auxiliary Water Sn lies (A)Auxiliary supply that is interconnected with a piping Airgap separation- stem connected to the public water s stem TWS (B)Auxiliary supply that is not interconnected with a piping system connected to the PWS and has piped water Reduced pressure conveyed under pressure in a piping Ustem less than 200 feet princivie-�— from the piping Ustem connected to the PWS 2 Fire Protection Systems (A)Fire protection system interconnected wither piping system connected to the PWS and an onsite auxiliary water Air gap separatior� sqMly for fire fi htin Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 14 ...._D R A F T..--- (B) Fire protection system supplied by the PWS with an interconnection to onsite storage facilities and pumas,or Reduced pressure combined fire and industrial water rinci lie! 3 Marina or port facilities (A) Residential Reducedr_D rinci le- (B)Nonresidential Reduced pressure rinci le- (4)Premises with multiple service connections to the PWS Reduced ressure rinci l (5)Recycled Water' Welef Ge" (A) Recycled water supply system that is 1. interconnected to a Qiping system eoxneeted-te-the Air gap separatioT4 that contains water• received from a PWS. 2. not interconnected to a piping system Reduced pressure )ASS that contains water received from a PWS. rip (B) ider3ses esiT&ERecycled water in an appFeyed-duaF Double check valve- dwe 0M&supply used only for landscape irrigationm a approved dual-plumbed use area established pursuant to sections 60313 through 60316,which is used for 1.Individually owned residential units 2. Sites other than individually owned residential units Reduced pressure rinci le�- (6)Graywater(see graywater definition in Section 14876 of the California Water Code WA4 i system that produces,or collects and distributes, Air gap seoaratiorr graywater,and is 1_.interconnected to a piping system connected to the PWSS 2.not interconnected to a ping system connected to the Reduced pressure PWSSnp •n o (67)Sewage and Hazardous or Potentially Hazardous Substances (A) Waste water treatment processes, handling and/or pumping equipment interconnected to a piping system Air gap separation- connected to the PWS Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 15 .....DRAFT..... (B)Waste water treatment processes,handling and/or pumping equipment not interconnected to a piping system Air ggp separation connected to the PWS,except that no backflow protection is required for a single-family residence that has a sewage pump unless there are other hazards present on the propgM (C) Premises handling asubstance in any manner in which the substance may enter a piping system connected to the Air gap separation PWS. (D)Recreational vehicle dump station that is not Reduced.12ressure interconnected to a piping s stem connected to the PWS rinci I ; Q Piped irrigation system interconnected to a piping Reduced pressure system connected to the PWS. into which fertilizers, principl herbicides,or pesticides are,or are intended to be, injected into the irrigation water. (F) Piping system conveying a fluid not from an approved water supply that is Air gap separation 1_ interconnected to a piping system connected to the PWS 2. not interconnected to a piping system connected to the Reduced pressure PWS pdnciplez (78)Roadway right-of--way irrigation system Pressure vacuum interconnected to a wiping system connected to the PWS. breaker and there is no potential for back pressure $9 Water storage facility not ander control of the PWS Air a aratioW ,(,The water supplier shall not allow a lower level of protection than that designated z The water supplier may allow protection at one level lower than that designated pursuant to subsection 64758(b). A lower level of protection may be allowed iif the recycled water supplier obtains the approval of the local public water supplier,or of the Department if the water supplier is also the supplier of the recycled water'-.j aAn approved alternative backflow protection plan a used shall be is implemented that at a minimum includes annual inspections and annual sew tests of the recycled water and potable water systems to determine whether an cross connections exist.) NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375,Health and Safety Code. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 16 .._._D R A F T----- Section 64760. Standards for Types of Backflow Protection. (a)The water supplier shall ensure that each air-gap separation meets the requirements in section 603.1.2 of the Uniform Plumbing Code (b)The water supplier shall ensure that each installed pressure vacuum breaker, double check valve, and reduced pressure principle backflow prevention assembly: (1) Meets the requirements in this chapter, (2)Meets the applicable American Water Works Standards, as follows: (A)C512-99-Air Release, AirNacuum,and Combination Air Valves for Waterworks Service: (B) C511-97-Reduced-Pressure Principle Backflow Prevention Assembly; or (C)C510-97-Double Check Valve Backflow Prevention Assembly and (3) Is approved through laboratory and field evaluation tests performed by the Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research of the University of Southern California or an entity with equivalent testing requirements. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375 Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 116375. Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 4. BACKFLOW PROTECTION INSTALLATION, TESTING AND REPAIRS. Section 64762. Installation Criteria For Backflow Protection (a) For air-gaps,the following shall apply: (1)The receiving water container shall be located on the water user's premises at the water user's service connection unless an alternate location has been approved by the water supplier. (2)All piping between the water user's service connection and the discharge location of the receiving water container shall be above finished grade and be accessible for visual inspection unless an alternative piping configuration is approved by the water supplier. (3)The water supplier shall ensure that the air-gap specified in section 64760(a) has been installed. (b)A reduced pressure orinciple backflow prevention assembly shall be installed such that the lowest point of the assembly is a minimum of twelve inches and a maximum of 36 inches,above finished grade unless an alternative is approved by the water supplier. (c)A pressure vacuum breaker assembly shall be installed a minimum of twelve inches above all downstream piping. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,1005 Page 17 Tmmmmm d A reduced vressure gnncigle or double check valve backflow prevention assembly installed after Vapproximate effective date ofreoulation when that can b jonfighpated)-1 shall have a minimum side clearance of twelve inches, except that a minimum side clearance of 24 inches shall be provided on the side of the assembly that contains the test cocks. (e)Backflow protection shall be located at the water user's service connection unless one or more alternative locations have been approved by the water supplier. The water supplier shall obtain access to the water user's premises and shall ensure that the on-site protection meets the requirements of this chapter for installation,testing and inspections. (f) Each backflow prevention assembly and air gap separation shall be accessible for field testing and maintenance. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375.Health and SafetLCode. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Section 64764. Field Testin¢ and Repair of Backflow Prevention Assemblies, and Air Gap Inspection. (a) The water supplier shall require that all backflow prevention assemblies installed pursuant to this chapter be field tested following installation, repair,or relocation and at least annually thereafter. All required field testing shall be performed by persons who are currently certified in the testing of backflow prevention assembliesbyCalifornia—Nevada Section of the American Water Works Association,the American Backflow Prevention Association, or an organization with equivalent certification requirements. (b)Air-gap separations installed pursuant to sections 64760(a)and 64762(a)shall be visually inspected by the water supplier at least annually to determine compliance with this chapter. (c)The water supplier shall ensure that backflow prevention assemblies that fail the field test are repaired or replaced within 30 days. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325. 116350 and 116375 Health and Safety Code Reference: Section 1163 75, Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 6. ADDITIONAL CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONEMNITY WATER SYSTEMS Section 64768. Requirements for Operating Rules of Service or Ordinances. In addition to the applicable requirements in this chapter,each community water system shall implement a cross-connection control program that includes operating rules of service or ordinances adopted to enable the water supplier to: Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 18 __...D R A F T-®®®® (a)Comply with the requirements of this chanter, (b) Discontinue a water user's service if designated criteria are not met (c)Prevent cross connections, and (d)Provide protection against backflow. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 7. RECORDKEEPING AND NOTIFICATION Section 64770. Recordkeening. (a)Each water supplier shallmaintainrecords of the following: (1)Most current hazard assessment,conducted pursuant to section 64755 (Hazard Assessment): (2) Locations and types of backflow protection and associated hazards: (3)Results of all backflow prevention assembly field testing and air gap inspections for the most recent three years,and (4) Repairs made to, or replacement or relocation of, backflow protection for the most recent three years. (b) Summaries of the information in subsection (a)shall be available to the Department on request. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and SafM Code. Section 64772. Notification. Each water supplier shall notify the Department of any known incident of backflow into the public water system within 24 hours of discovery of the incident. If requested to do so by the Department the water supplier shall submit a written report of the incident describing the nature and severity of the backflow, the actions taken by the water supplier in response to the incident and the action plan intended to prevent such incidents in the future. NOTE: Authority cited: Sections 116325, 116350 and 116375, Health and Safety Code. Reference: Section 116375, Health and Safety Code. Cross Connection Control Regulations-DRAFT December 8,2005 Page 19 Jenny Ferguson Owner/Designer jenny@watersmart.biz 805.602.8206 TEL 805.541.0645 FAX . www.watersmart.biz watersmart P Addendum to the J J ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 CT REPOR T J J FOR THE J CHINATOWN PROJECT 1 EIR CASE NO. ER # 69-05 SCH # 2006111012 j Of e mkis o sp4 ame J 1 September 2009 xf J J P J 1 Prepared for: J 1 1J 1 J J Addendum to the D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J 1 FOR THE CHINATOWN PROJECT J EIR CASE NO. ER # 69-05 SCH # 2006111012 J � September 2009 J 1 1 J ameO J� 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS J� ADDENDUM TO THE CHINATOWN PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA J TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE J 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 PURPOSE AND LEGAL AUTHORITY............................................................ 1-2 1.3 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENTS............................................................. 1-2 J 1.4 REQUIRED APPROVALS............................................................................. 1-3 1.5 PROJECT APPLICANT AND PROJECT DESIGNERS........................................ 1-3 1.6 CONTENTS OF THE FINAL EIR ADDENDUM............................................... 1-4 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................2-1 2.1 REVISED PROJECT OVERVIEW.................................................................1.2-1 2.2 REVISED PROJECT COMPONENTS AND COMPARISON OF MAJOR CHANGES..................................................................................................2-2 1 2.2.1 Demolition, Site Preparation, and Construction Activities .........2-3 2.2.2 Proposed Buildings......................................................................2-6 2.2.3 Pedestrian Circulation................................................................2-11 2.2.4 Vehicle Parking and Circulation................................................2-13 2.3 REVISED PROJECT LEVEL DETAILS AND SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES................................................................................................2-14 2.3.1 Monterey Street Level ...............................................................2-14 2.3.2 Plaza Level.................................................................................2-17 2.3.3 Palm Street Level 1....................................................................2-20 J 2.3.4 Palm Street Level 2....................................................................2-22 1 2.3.5 Palm Street Level 3....................................................................2-24 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES.........3-1 3.1 OVERVIEW................................................................................ 3-1 ................ J 3.2 MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED .............3-2 , J 3.2.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources........................... ..3-2 .................... 3.2.2 Cultural Resources.......................................................................3-4 3.2.3 Population and Housing ....................3-9 3.2.4 Transportation and Traffic.........................................................3-10 J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES....................................................4-1 J 4.1 OVERVIEW................................................................................................4-1 J 1 J Chinatown Project i Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES NUMBER TITLE PAGE C 2.2-1 Existing Site and Revised Proposed Demolition Plan, Chinatown _ Project.............................................................................................................2-4 2.2-2 Revised Overall Site Plan, Chinatown Project................................................2-7 r 2.2-3 Details of Revised'Plaza/Walkway System, Chinatown Project..................2-12 2.3-1 Revised Monterey Street Level Floor Plans, Chinatown Project .................2-15 2.3-2 Revised Plaza Level Floor Plans, Chinatown Project...................................2-18 2.3-3 Revised Palm Street Level 1 Floor Plans, Chinatown Project......................2-21 2.3-4 Revised Palm Street Level 2 Floor Plans, Chinatown Project......................2-23 _ 2.3-5 Revised Palm Street Level 3 Floor Plans, Chinatown Project......................2-25 2.3-6 Hotel Roof Plans, Chinatown Project........................................... 2.3-7 Revised Morro and Palm Street Elevations, Chinatown Project..................2-29 2.3-8 Revised Monterey and Chorro Street Elevations, Chinatown Project..........2-30 2.3-9 Revised Project Cross Sections Looking Northeast, Chinatown Project...........................................................................................................2-31 2.3-10 Revised Project Cross Sections Looking Northwest, Chinatown L Project...........................................................................................................2-32 LIST OF TABLES NUMBER TITLE PAGE 2.2-1 Comparison of Revised Project Details..........................................................2-5 2.2-2 Comparison of Revised Site Preparation Details*..........................................2-5 2.2-3 Comparison of Revised Building . Details.......*' . ...........................................2-6 2.2-4 Comparison of Revised Pedestrian Circulation Details................................2-11 2.2-5 Comparison of Revised Vehicle Parking Details..........................................2-14 2.3-1 Comparison of Commercial Area(Square Footage) by Floor Level............2-27 _ 2.3-2 Comparison of Residential Area (Square Footage)by Floor Level..............2-28 3.2-1 Jobs/Housing Ratio.........................................................................................3-9 3.2-2 Revised PM Peak-Hour Project Trip Generation Rates and Estimates ........3-11 3.2-3 Revised Vehicle Parking Requirements........................................................3-12 3.2-4 Revised Parking Estimates Summary ...........................................................3-14 _ 3.2-5 Comparison Summary of Impact Determination for Major Issues...............3-15 ES-1 Class I Impacts - Significant, Unavoidable Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated to Less Than Significant Levels.........:..................................4-2 ES-2 Class II Impacts - Significant Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels................................................................................4-13 ES-3 Class III Impacts - Impacts That Are Adverse But Less Than Significant........................................... - u Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 J 1.0 INTRODUCTION J J 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION J 1.1 OVERVIEW This document consists of an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (September 2007) and Final EIR Update (November 2007) which evaluates the proposed Chinatown Project in the City of San Luis Obispo, California. This Final EIR Addendum, prepared by AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. (AMEC) has been 1 produced in cooperation with City of San Luis Obispo staff and reflects the latest i redesign of the proposed Chinatown Project submitted by the applicant. The proposed revisions to the project were made by the applicant in response to City Council direction to consider further incorporation of important architectural features of historic structures into the new construction, to address continuing public concerns over the size, height, J and scale of the original project and to respond to evolving market conditions. The revised material in this. document is intended to be used in combination with the Chinatown Project Final EIR (September 2007)/Final EIR Update (November 2007) to understand the environmental impacts of the revised Chinatown Project, the associated mitigation measures, and the range of related project alternatives. J The revised Chinatown Project would involve the redevelopment of approximately 75 1 percent of one city block within the Downtown Commercial Core with retail, office, restaurant, hotel, residential, and subterranean parking. However, proposed revisions would further reduce the amount of new development from approximately 235,320 square feet (sf) proposed as part of the last project revision to 197,811 sf, including elimination of one level of underground parking. The revised project would incorporate additional historic resources into the new construction through adaptive reuse (i.e., Sauer -` Bakery Building and Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel), and overall project size, height, and scale would be reduced by greater upper-story setbacks, as described further in Section 2.0. Overall project objectives to revitalize and enhance the downtown's economy through mixed-use commercial and residential development would % remain the same as discussed in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update for the Chinatown Project. 1 J J jChinatown Project 1-1 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.2 PURPOSE AND LEGAL AUTHORITY The Chinatown Project Final EIR/Final EIR Update was prepared in accordance with the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), published by the Resources Agency of the State of California (Title 14, California Code of Regulations 15000 et. seq.), and the City of San Luis Obispo's procedures for implementing CEQA. This Addendum to the Final EIR/Final EIR Update is consistent with the standards provided in Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, which set forth the conditions governing use of an addendum to a final EIR. Under the guidelines provided in this section, it is the City's determination that the use of an Addendum to the Final EIR/Final EIR Update is appropriate because: • The revised project is generally consistent to that addressed in the Final EIR Update, has impacts similar to the Final EIR Update, and would be subject to similar previously discussed mitigation measures. • The revised project would not create any new significant effects not previously disclosed in the EIR. _ • No substantial new mitigation measures would be required; only minor modifications would be required to previously proposed mitigation measures which have already been subject to public review and comment. • The revised project was submitted in response to and in consideration of public comments previously received and previously reviewed alternatives. This Addendum to the Final EIR/Final EIR Update will represent the findings of the City of San Luis Obispo regarding potential impacts of constructing and operating the proposed Chinatown Project and will be considered by the City Council during the hearings on the proposed project. 1.3 PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENTS The Draft EIR public comment period ran from June 11 to July 25, 2007 and a public C hearing was held before the Planning Commission on July 11, 2007 to receive public comments on the Draft EIR. Comments received at the public hearing, as well as written comments received during the public review period, are addressed in Section 7 of the Final EIR. Updates made to the project after the Final EIR was completed (September 1-2 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 L P 1.0 INTRODUCTION J .J 2007), but prior to certification, were incorporated into the Final EIR Update (November 2007), which was considered by the Planning Commission on November 28, 2007 and certified by the City Council on December 18, 2007. Due to the timing of the submittal of the most recent project revisions after certification of the Final EIR/Final EIR Update, this Addendum to the Final EIR has been provided to permit consideration by the public, interested agencies, and City decision-makers in advance of upcoming hearings on the revised project design before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC), Cultural Heritage Committee, and City Council. 1.4 REQUIRED APPROVALS The following entitlements would apply to various project components: ARC review of the final project design with input from the Cultural Heritage J Committee; and final project approval by the City Council; C Review of the Addendum to the certified EIR by the City Council, which would C' occur concurrently with their review of the project design; Y At a future date following City Council approval of the project design, C consideration and approval by the City Council of a Tentative Map to combine C existing parcels and allow for condominium ownership; C, L' The major change in discretionary actions from the originally proposed project would be C that no Use Permit would be required for consideration by the Planning. Commission C because none of the proposed buildings would exceed 50 feet. As a result, the Downtown Building Height and Intensity Limits Zoning Amendments would not apply to Cthe revised proposed project. O 1.5 PROJECT APPLICANT AND PROJECT DESIGNERS C' C Applicant: C C Tom and Jim Copeland C SLO Chinatown, LLC P.O. Box 12260 C San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 C C C CChinatown Project 1-3 C Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 C 1.0 INTRODUCTION Architect: Mark Rawson, AIA Copelands' Properties P.O. Box 1085 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 1.6 CONTENTS OF THE FINAL EIR ADDENDUM This Final EIR Addendum is intended to be used in conjunction with the Chinatown - Project Final EIR/Final EIR Update to assist City of San Luis Obispo staff, the public, and decision-makers in their review of the revised project. This document updates the analyses in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update, focusing on changes in project impacts and mitigation measures that result from the proposed redesign of the Chinatown Project. This document focuses only on significant changes and does not update each issue area, even when some change could occur. Because of this, the three documents should be used together as discussed below to understand the environmental issues associated with the project as it is now proposed. This Final EIR Addendum is organized into four sections. Section 1.0, Introduction, (' summarizes the background of the revised project, describes the statutory basis for the Final EIR Addendum, explains the proposed project's public review process, and details limited changes in required approvals from the City. Section 1.0 updates and should be used in conjunction with Section 1.0 of the Final EIR/Final EIR Update. Section 2.0, Revised Project Description, provides a detailed discussion of the revisions to the project description, as well as comparisons of substantive changes from the Final EIR/Final EIR Update. This section should be used in conjunction with the Project Description in the Final EIR which discusses project location and existing setting, and should replace sections which present the proposed project overview and details on project components. A comparison of the major changes in project impacts and the effect on required \ mitigation measures for the most significant issue areas are detailed in Section 3.0, Revised Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures. This section focuses on issue areas J where there have been more noteworthy changes in impacts or mitigation measures O associated with the revised project, including: • Aesthetics and Visual Resources • Cultural Resources e I'4 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 A J 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION J • Population and Housing J • Transportation and Traffic J Section 4.0, Revised Impact Summary Tables, provides an impact summary table in which all impacts and mitigation measures have been adjusted to reflect the impacts of 1 the revised project and all mitigation measures that would still be required. This section replaces the Executive Summary Impact Tables (ES-1 through ES-3) contained in the 1 Final EIR/Final EIR Update. J J J 1 J J 1 J J 1 1 J 1 J Chinatown Project 1-5 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 REVISED PROJECT OVERVIEW J The revised Chinatown Project would consist of a mix of new and remodeled multi-story mixed-use buildings, pedestrian walkways/plazas and underground parking. However, as discussed below, the proposed amount of residential development would be substantially J reduced while space allocated to commercial uses would increase. In addition, the overall amount of development would be reduced from previous proposals and proposed structures would generally be three and four stories rather than the taller structures 1 originally proposed. The revised project would also include increased adaptive reuse of historic structures, particularly of elements of the Sauer Bakery and Blackstone Hotel i Buildings. Some of these design changes have been incorporated into the project to address concerns raised during the public review process while others respond to changing market trends. J The revised project would include the development of the 2.12-acre site to accommodate a mixed-use center consisting of five multi-story buildings linked by pedestrian walkways/plazas and a one-level partial subterranean parking structure. The proposed buildings would generally range from two to four stories in height and would support a range of uses including ground-floor retail, office, and restaurant with upper stories dedicated to a mix of residential and hotel uses. Retail storefronts would open onto Monterey Street, Morro Street, and the new internal pedestrian walkway/plaza system. J The primary hotel entrance and driveway would now front on Palm Street, opposite the existing Palm Street Parking Structure. Although the locations of specific improvements would change to accommodate the revised site design, the proposed size of utilities/services and type, appearance and coverage of landscaping would remain essentially as described in the original project description in the Chinatown Project Final .�' EIR/Final EIR Update. The public portion of the pedestrian walkway/plaza system _✓ would be reduced in total area with the elimination of the pedestrian path east of the Muzio's Building and the conversion of the Central Court path to a semi-public path for .�' the hotel; however, the revised West Pedestrian Walk area would incorporate a "linear park" design, consisting of a series of landscape areas covered in low-water-consumption turf and in-ground planters and trees accommodating a 20-foot-wide clear fire lane. In -� addition, `Green Roof landscaping would be incorporated on the roof level of the proposed hotel. As with original designs, the proposed project would consolidate private Chinatown Project 2-1 Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 r 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION I� and public parcels and lead to removal of both private and public structures and surface parking. 2.2 REVISED PROJECT COMPONENTS AND COMPARISON OF MAJOR CHANGES The revised Chinatown Project would continue to include construction of multiple-story mixed-use buildings connected with a pedestrian walkway/plaza system. However, the _ revised project would include substantial relocation of proposed uses on the site when compared to original proposals. The proposed hotel would be relocated away from Mission Plaza to the northeast portion of the site, adjacent to the comer of Palm and _ Morro Streets, while the residential building would be relocated to the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets, a configuration opposite of the former project design (Chinatown Project Final EIR Update). The revised project would also be reduced from approximately 235,320 square feet (sf) to 197,811 sf (a. reduction in scope by approximately 16 percent), including elimination of one level of underground parking - (approximately 46 percent reduction in parking area square footage)'. The total number of parking spaces would be reduced from 122 to 74. The revised project would incorporate portions of key historic structural building elements into new construction through adaptive reuse (i.e., Sauer Bakery Building and Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel). In addition, overall project size, height, and scale would be reduced by greater upper-story setbacks. Project uses would also change in size, with the most substantial change in residential from 36 to 16 units (approximately 64 percent reduction in residential square footage), including elimination of live/work units. Proposed retail, office, and hotel square footage would increase (approximately 17, 22, and 28 percent, respectively). The revised project would also include reduction in size (by approximately 41 percent) and reconfiguration of the internal public pedestrian plaza/walkway system to accommodate a hotel inner courtyard/pedestrian walkway.Z Regarding architectural style, proposed structures along Monterey Street are intended to generally remain compatible with the "Main Street" character of the Downtown Historic District. Under the amended project, elements of the Sauer Bakery and the Cornerstone The original Chinatown Project addressed in the Final EIR totaled 310,544 sf. This analysis compares the revised project to the Final EIR Update approved by the City Council;a project which was substantially reduced in size from the original proposal. Z The hotel inner courtyard/pedestrian walkway would provide additional pedestrian access areas that are proposed to be generally open to the public,but which may be closed on occasion for special events. 2-2 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 r 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J J Building/historic Blackstone Hotel would be retained and adaptively reused with any necessary seismic strengthening. The Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel J would be reconstructed to reflect the architecture of the Quintana .Building with the Italian Swiss facade remaining a distinct element along Chorro Street. In addition, elements of Chinese architecture have been incorporated into parts of the proposed contemporary project design located within the Chinese Historic District, specifically J along Palm and Chorro streets, including Chinese `Key Pattern' or `Thunder Pattern' glass motif, balcony railings with Chinese `Eight Diagrams' patterns, a wood screen J `Lantern', `Celadon Green' cement plaster, `Cracked Ice' glazing, bamboo lattice, `Ah Louis' brick, and public art with etched graphic historical imagery. The revised project would also incorporate reuse of the historic Chop Suey restaurant sign in the Central Plaza area. rs �Cmm[pinm Rodin.::= fcmrntp tci{rchn. quad =6_. _{—�aw_avc R'wd Pvca� — Huvmd S.dLyi noa��Bivrdd � ,,. '"�`"S�r'1` — �W�IWiSL.I. _I-/��`! -11.: —___ •._ — �,,,��J. .• ;P.pwW:r I r—, Ewshng Sauer Build -off `� Bkickstone Bwlding _. MM V1 FlIq V t fent Pluv L A.cl f�""�PiH Tic�—lC 15mrcfmm ftt WAUr Give I SSrc Baic—I / Ih�h 11uLL!,ud- •— (:m-n Plots c/ lka'w:vc Quin+ /\/'32 f'Iucd.Ti� h5'l.ud 6'wiil;ply Adicf Paids cul inm�pw Suaiad Pcurm {cmn fstry d. 'Ga . `> Project components and changes in major features are discussed in detail in the following sections and are summarized in Table 2.2-1. 2.2.1 Demolition, Site Preparation, and Construction Activities jConstruction activities would remain similar to those described in the original project jdescription in the Chinatown Final EIR/Final EIR Update; however, demolition activities would be somewhat reduced as a result of adaptive reuse of the Sauer Bakery Building and Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel (Figure 2.2-1). Site preparation and excavation would be reduced due to elimination of one level of subterranean parking; Chinatown Project 2-3 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 o m a-Oi a CD - ¢` o oz� O 'D m mA 1 Co o m 7 m LL m m y m \ w • O .o m > m m.>_ H a I-a > a R_\ w LU y C E m. Co m c> c E O!U a C c z C m E � o m m m o W O N Q .y m y N E m O Q En w n J X m X m X m X m X m % C J CL wa LU U) LU a: WQ W 2 0 w ¢ � y I I O Parking Tees Me SLO OfficesCit Parkinges Structure MORRO STREET o c i---'-- O Bladerunner Day Spa 101IN Ec R l o 0 d _ O'er ,,rte-1, 1 1�•� ` �'� O d r i\�\0].�72:�\ \ \� a C 4. 'o • :� a pD C ,•V_ _ C W •��;I -�'-I I ' a "-'`\=--=--'------------- - ll --------------------- , - ----------------- --j Moondoggiesui W �I _ • r-, G r_y__ w W m z VI U 0 W CI CION -.. Chop Suey I N • C\�� LANO aA O CHORRO STREET 2-4 i J 1 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J Table 2.2-1. Comparison of Revised Project Details Previous Project. mal EIR Update) Revised Project Addendum to EIR J Use 'De nits Sizes Details/Units Size s Retail 10 spaces ' 43,750 15 spaces Z 51,150 J Office 3 l space 4,600 4 spaces 3 5,630 Restaurant Seating for 100 people 6,000 Seating for 100 people 6,000 Residential 32 units 53,570 16 units 19,161 Live/Work 4 units 4,000 0 units 0 Hotel 67 rooms 67,000 78 rooms 85,430 Parking 122 spaces 56,400 74 spaces 30,440 J Total 5 buildings 235,320 5 buildings 197,811 The previous(Final EIR Update)site plans show 10 individual retail spaces scattered through the project's lower levels ranging from 900 to over 14,000 sf in size;however,this general floor plan may not reflect long-term occupancy. J The amended site plans show 15 individual retail spaces scattered through the project's lower levels ranging from 260 to over 12,000 sf in size;however,this general floor plan may not reflect long-term occupancy. 3 Office spaces shown on site plans may be leased whole or subdivided into'individual offices. however, substantial site preparation would still be required. .For example, grading would still be necessary to level portions of the site up to 14 feet below existing ground surface (bgs) from Monterey Street back (north) to accommodate the proposed Monterey and Central plazas and parts of Building C. In addition, excavation up to approximately J 14 feet bgs would be required at the deepest areas of excavation along Palm Street in the far northeastern portion of the site to accommodate the partial subterranean parking garage. Site grading would require the use of heavy equipment such as bulldozers, excavators, and backhoes to cut into and remove soil and bedrock for loading into heavy haul trucks. It is estimated that the revised proposed project would , involve approximately 9,700 cubic yards (cy) of excavation and the use of 700 one-way haul truck trips to remove soil and demolition debris. Demolition and site preparation activities are expected to require approximately three to four months. A comparison of changes to site preparation details is summarized in Table 2.2-2. J Table 2.2-2. Comparison of Revised Site Preparation Details* 1 Previous Project Revised Project Activity (Final EIR.U date Addendum to EIR . Excavation 45,500 cy 9,700 cy Debris Removal(one- 3,000(15.2 cy truck volume) 638(15.2 cy truck volume) way haul truck trips) or or 3,273 (13.9 cy truck volum 700(13.9 cy truck volume) ' Based on applicant proposed grading estimates reviewed and confirmed by AMSC. J 1 J Chinatown Project 2-5 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION i 2.2.2 Proposed Buildings The proposed project would include adaptive reuse of the Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel (Building B-1) and the Sauer Bakery (Building B-2), retention and seismic retrofit of the existing Moondoggies/Muzio's building (Building D), and the construction of four buildings (Buildings A-East, A-West, B-3, and C) connected by a \_ public plaza/walkways system (Figure 2.2-2). The buildings would generally range from two to four stories in height above the ground level of adjacent streets, with maximum elevations up to 50 feet. Upper stories of some buildings would be set back from = surrounding streets to provide architectural relief and minimize shading. Retail, restaurant, office, and hotel space would generally occupy the ground floor frontages, with the second stories comprising a mix of hotel and residential,space. The third floor would consist of residential uses overlying the historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery Buildings (Building B) and hotel rooms overlying the site's northeast cotter (Building A). The fourth floor would consist solely of hotel rooms in Building A. Access to individual buildings and uses would be available off the plaza/walkway system and from Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets. A comparison of revisions by building is summarized in Table 2.2-3. Table 2.2-3. Comparison of Revised Building Details Previous Project tEIRU date Revised Project Addendum to,MR) - Height Footprint Total Size Height Footprint Total Size Baildin ft ' Sizes s (ft), Sizes . _ (sf)-. _ A(East and West) 43 34,600 132,070 41 28,430 I 124,330 B (1,2,and 3) 50 14,650 66,000 47 16,800 36,140 C 50 7,550 28,050 48 12,920 27,626 D 30 4,600 9,200 30 5,825 9,715 Total 50(max.)' 61,400 235,320 50(max.) 63,975 197,811 Average Finished Grade Building A-East. Building A-East is proposed as a new five-level structure (including C the subterranean parking garage and roof levels) located within an approximately 15,400- sf building footprint at the corner of Palm and Morro streets, in the northeastern portion of the project site. One of these levels would be subterranean parking, partially below the grade of Palm Street, three levels would be above the grade of Palm Street (i.e., a 2-6 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 T p _ Y U O C N <6 to O N9 m m m N -cc >. m m - m m m N L m '2 N N N V Y m F Oc: 0 a m m L m � m m m m y Ca m m H m \ y~j v � .� �mm � Nm `o'R N —`o '`° 3 m ; R.\ W Al LL WN m U > Ol j N m 0 m` N N O (C6 ~ Z m J W a m I m m L 1 .p m I m j m I j m O Z J JOO Q m N v m e m U m m m t] m ty to m m CM m a� oo.. m— -0 '.F m rn m m m U J o o c � oc 'T—0 c ^ c ° c ^ c N a cE Q o rn a a '4 L N "O M N m 15 N 'N a a` to m m CO a z w3 x a o O v � o v a ED ° " x `v 1 0 O ,J Tees Me SLO - 6 2 11MORRO STREET = _ J — i i i i i i i i �lfidfiil9ld� -: � � �Iddllllfir & _ + >° Bladerunner Day Spa d Full D 41 Circle W -- - O WIL c r y _ m L2 is 00 21 �U _ y MU2iOa W >11 ✓. N s b B t Roomer _ ^ 1 V 6 O % Monte��re try'fi [_• Jd Moondoggies i Y 4 Jw-LPL e, —W=.Ik� " G� � ; ' Z Forden's ..� m ti O L — a F C E In $1I156elQltr F y Building Chop Suey�-- Udo a Johnson's [FAH Uw a° <� Rcsidcntial ... . ' CHORRO STREET ®_ c o aU N ,^ ' Historic Mission h San Luis Obispo de Tolosa ' 2.7 f 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION three-story building), and a viewing terrace would be located on the roof level of the building. The lowest level (Plaza Level) would consist of hotel and residential parking at approximately 4 to 14 feet below the existing Palm Street grade, resulting in a four-story building frontage from the internal plaza level perspective. This level would also include - a vehicle entry driveway from Morro Street exclusively for use by residents and hotel valet. In addition, retail uses would be located at this level along the southern boundary of the building, accessible from the South Pedestrian Walkway. The second level (Palm Street Level) would consist of the hotel lobby/lounge area, the hotel spa, a hotel pavilion, and the hotel inner courtyard area with access to the South Pedestrian Walkway. This level would also contain the hotel's "motor court" style vehicle drop-off and pick-up area at Palm Street. The third and fourth levels (Palm Street Level 2 and Palm Street Level 3) would consist of 18 guest rooms each, the hotel fitness center, hotel terraces, and elevated walkways connecting to additional guest rooms in Building A-West. A hotel viewing terrace would be located on the roof level of the building, along with solar photovoltaic panels and `Green Roof landscaping. The maximum height of Building A- East would be 50 feet above average finished grade. The above-ground levels of this structure would total 44,600-sf. Building A-West. Building A-West is proposed as a new five-level structure located within an approximately 13,030-sf building footprint at the north-central portion of the project site on Palm Street. One of these levels would be subterranean parking, partially below the grade of Palm Street, three levels would be above the grade of Palm Street (i.e., a three-story building), and the hotel pool deck would be located on the roof level of the building. The lowest level (Plaza Level) of the structure would consist of hotel parking at approximately 4 to 12 feet below the existing Palm Street grade, resulting in a four-story building frontage from the internal plaza level perspective. This level would also include hotel and utility service areas along the western boundary of the building. In addition, retail uses would be located at this level along the southern boundary of the building, accessible from the South Pedestrian Walkway. The second level (Palm Street Level 1) would consist of the hotel restaurant fronting on Palm Street and the hotel banquet room fronting on the hotel inner courtyard. The third and fourth levels (second _ and third stories above ground at Palm Street)would consist of 21 hotel guest rooms each and elevated walkways connecting to Building A-East. A hotel pool deck would be located on the roof level of the building, along with solar hot water collectors for pool heating. The maximum height of Building A-West would be approximately 50 feet. This w 2-8 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 J 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 would constitute the three visible above-grade stories of this proposed structure totaling approximately 36,830-sf. �- Building B. Building B is proposed as a three-story structure located within a 16,800-sf building footprint at the comer of Chorro and Monterey Streets, in the southwestern portion of the project site across from Mission Plaza. The 36,140-sf building would consist of three separate buildings: the Blackstone Hotel (B1); the Sauer Bakery (B-2); J and a new two-level retail building on the eastern side (B-3). The historic Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings would be adaptively reused for J new construction of Building B, including seismic retrofitting, renovation, and remodeling. This adaptive reuse would generally entail: • retention of the wall of the historic Blackstone Hotel along Chorro Street; • reconstruction of the original architecture of the wall of the historic Blackstone Hotel along Monterey Street; • remodel of the original wall of the Sauer Bakery Building along Monterey Street; • reconstruction of the original bracketed cornice of the Sauer Bakery Building; • retention of the existing window along the northeast fagade of the Sauer Bakery J Building; • recreation of the original horizontal siding on the Monterey Street fagade of the J Sauer Bakery Building; • strengthening and seismic retrofitting of the unreinforced brick rear building of the Sauer Bakery; J • retention of the historic Sauer Bakery ovens; and • strengthening and leveling of all floors. J The resultant fagades of the proposed buildings would incorporate specific design details J and character elements derived from their original architecture, including restoration of 1 historic Blackstone Hotel porthole windows and incorporation of the original Sauer J Building fagade. The maximum height of Building B would be 47 feet above average finished grade. The ground floor (Monterey Street Level) and second floor (Plaza Level) of Buildings B- I and B-2 would consist of retail uses. The third floor (Palm Street Level 1) of Building B-1 would include four residential units, with 7-foot setbacks at the third floor to Chinatown Project 2-9 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION accommodate decks along Chorro Street and a 2-foot offset for a portion of the Monterey Street elevation. The new retail building (B-3) would contain a total of 4,555-sf and be located adjacent to the Monterey Plaza. A single-story element designed to preserve views from Monterey Street of the existing second-floor windows of the adjacent Sauer Bakery building on the west side would contain 1,285-sf of retail space accessed from Monterey Street. Other portions of the building would be accessed off the Monterey Plaza/pedestrian walkway with 2,020-sf of floor space on the ground floor and 1,250-sf at a second level accessed off the Central Plaza. _ Building C. Building C is proposed as a new three-story structure located within a - 12,920-sf building footprint along Monterey Street, in the southeastern portion of the project site. The approximately 27,626-sf building would consist of one level of retail on the ground floor. The second floor would consist of four residential units (including two moderate-income affordable dwelling units, #7 and 98) set back off Monterey Street and three offices in the rear-opening onto the pedestrian plaza/walkway system. The third - floor would include six additional residential units, with setbacks from Monterey Street. The maximum height of Building C would be 48 feet above average existing grade. Building D. Building D would involve the remodel and retrofit of the existing two-story historic Muzio's building (Moondoggies) located within a 5,825-sf building footprint along Monterey Street, in the south-central portion of the proposed site. The 9,715-sf building currently consists of a ground floor retail space (Moondoggies/Muzio's) and unoccupied residential units on the second floor. As part of the proposed project, the existing building would be seismically retrofitted and renovated, without any changes to the front fagade. The existing wood stairway and decks at the rear would be removed and replaced with a new 1,225-sf building addition. The first story would be remodeled and - remain in retail use; the second story of the building would be remodeled into two residential units set back off Monterey Street and office space in the rear opening onto i� the pedestrian plaza/walkway system. The maximum height of Building D would remain at approximately 30 feet. - 2-10 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 i 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J J 1 2.2.3 Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian circulation would be provided by three walkways with mid-block access points onto Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets, and would lead to a central plaza located on the site's second level (Figure 2.2-3). Access to individual buildings and uses would . be available off this plaza/walkway system and from Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets. The main entrance stairway and adjacent ramp to the plazas/walkway system would be located on Monterey Street between Buildings B and D and would include a terraced transition through the proposed Monterey Plaza. This entrance would be slightly offset from the existing Monterey Street crosswalk. Another main pedestrian entrance would be provided via the West Pedestrian Walk, a street-level walkway/ramp from Palm Street located along the site's western boundary; no crosswalk is proposed at this location. This walkway would incorporate a "linear park" design, consisting of a series of landscape areas covered in low-water-consumption turf and in-ground planters and trees accommodating a 20-foot-wide clear fire lane. The South Pedestrian Walk would consist of a ramp accessed from mid-block on Morro Street, including a water feature and seating, connecting to the Central Plaza. This walkway is proposed to connect with a .i new mid-block crosswalk on Morro Street to link up to the library walkway east of J Morro Street. In addition to these walkways, the Hotel Inner Courtyard, located between .. Buildings A-East and A-West, would also provide pedestrian circulation from Palm Street to the center of the site, connecting to the South Pedestrian Walk. However, this .� access may be controlled at times with movable barriers to provide for hotel functions. Additional entrances would be'provided via stairwells and elevators located throughout the site. A comparison of former and revised pedestrian circulation details is summarized in Table 2.2-4. .J Table 2.24. Comparison of Revised Pedestrian Circulation Details Previous Project Revised.Project _ Amenity Final EIR Update). Addendnm:to EIR Public Walkways 5 3' Public Plazas/Courts 3 2 Total Area 24,300 sf 14,220 sf %of Project Area 26% 15 % J In addition to the three walkways,the Hotel Inner Courtyard would provide pedestrian connection from Palm Street to the South Pedestrian Walk;however,this access may be controlled at times for hotel functions. Chinatown Project 2-11 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 Palin Street Plaza Entrance Hotel Walkway Entrance .. .—.._..—.._.._. .—..-----• LEGEND - L..J Proposed Project Area II I I _J Pedestrian Walkway/Circulation •-� y' Hotel Pedestrian Walkway I2-1I 0 y � I C Hotel Pedestrian Walkway : loll C Pedestrian Walkway Hotel Inner Courtyard i 18 I - - to v n Down Pedestrian Walkway ' Down oU ,� TDown- ---�a- xx Down m Bike Racks; v'V \ X o =_ \�\ / Water Feature? 1 n . Do m_ Fountain\entral T - -- ' X35' -� CD — Pla�� a i�U. � Bike Racks I..—..--•--•—• - Al I M erre I �1 :Plaza: Down 47' Pedestrian Walkway SCALE IN FEET 66r� 0la�taA'R 0 40 -. —-'— - _ — -—•-—••— •—•-— --—-- Note:Widths do not account for outdoor Monterey Street seating,street furniture,or Plaza Entrance landscaping elements. - Details of Revised Plaza/Walkway System FIGURE e� Chinatown Project 2o2-3 2_12 I 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 Mission Style sidewalks would be installed along all project frontages surrounding the ' project site per City requirements. Sidewalk passage widths would range from approximately 5-feet, 3-inches along Chorro Street to 10 feet along Monterey Street. Where possible, a minimum of 8 feet of effective clear pedestrian passage would be provided along the sidewalks while still maintaining mature street trees. However, due to the retention of existing historic buildings along Chorro Street, the sidewalks along this J frontage are limited in the ability to meet this goal. 2.2.4 Vehicle Parking and Circulation J 1 Proposed parking would be located on the Plaza Level of the project at approximately 4 to 14 feet below the existing Palm Street grade. Vehicle access to the proposed J subterranean parking structure would be from Morro Street, with the proposed driveway J located generally opposite the 919 Palm parking structure driveway across Morro Street. A total of 30 parking spaces would be provided for use by hotel guests utilizing the hotel J valet. An additional 24 spaces would be reserved for valet parking at the hotel's discretion. Residential parking would consist of an additional 20 parking spaces at this J level. All proposed parking would be dedicated and controlled and would serve uses within the project. The parking area would be controlled with a key card controlled gated access. One parking space would be dedicated to each residential unit which would be accessed J via key card at a control gate. Residential spaces within the parking garage would be -� separated from hotel parking areas. All hotel guests would arrive at the Palm Street J' vehicle drop-off and pick-up area, where baggage would be unloaded and check-in would occur. The hotel valet would then take the vehicle to the subterranean parking garage. The remaining hotel parking would be managed by the hotel operator and would be . strictly valet service. Parking would consist of both single spaces and triple tandem spaces. The triple tandem spaces would be used for vehicles that require less frequent ® access. No parking would be provided for the general public or employees. J Cleaning, upkeep and maintenance of the parking garage would be administered and managed by the hotel. Condominium owners would contribute to the overall costs of maintenance and upkeep on a prorated basis, through an agreement between the hotel and the condominium homeowners association. Chinatown Project 2-13 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 2.0 REviSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION A comparison of the previous and revised vehicle parking plans is summarized in Table _ 2.2-5. Table 2.2-5. Comparison of Revised Vehicle Parking Details Previous:Pro'ect 116hed Project Monterey Level Parking Spaces 60 0 Plaza Level Parking Spaces 62 74 Total Parking Spaces 122 74 _ With regard to on-street parking, a total of 24 metered parking spaces currently exist along the project frontage. Proposed on-street parking would include removal of a total of four metered spaces (two on Morro Street at the proposed parking garage driveway, and two on Palm Street at the proposed hotel motor court driveway) to be replaced by four new spaces(three on Monterey Street and one on Palm Street fronting the proposed restaurant). In addition, three new temporary green curb spaces and three new motorcycle parking spaces would be added along Monterey Street. 2.3 REVISED PROJECT LEVEL DETAILS AND SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES -_ As mentioned previously, a 20- to 25-foot difference in grade exists between the northern (Palm Street) boundary and southern (Monterey Street) boundary of the project site. Proposed excavation in the northern portion of the project site would lower the bottom level of the proposed project in that portion of the site by up to 14 feet below the existing r Palm Street grade. As a result, in order to discuss all components of the proposed project (including buildings and the plaza/walkway system) as a whole and in relation to each other, the project site is described below by level. This discussion focuses on the uses on publicly accessible levels associated with Monterey, Palm and Morro streets, with briefer summaries of the private upper-story levels. 2.3.1 Monterey Street Level The Monterey Street Level is the lowest level of the proposed project. This level includes a total of approximately 35,140-sf, including ground floor retail storefronts along Monterey Street and a rear utility area(Figure 2.3-1). }Project plans identify four new motorcycle parking spaces along Monterey Street;however,City review _ determined that the space provided would only allow for three. 2-14 Chinatown Project Fina[EIR Addendum—September 2009 J 1 aJ ro E c a) m m m m 3 N m ° MI m J r0 H O 'O m fn m ro Q C a a m m m m : Em o 2 V ° m H ro ro QL Co LL ro .. _ o. m� m 3 > in 3 ° >,coo m0 �1 Y ro m 0 a `—° ` m z Y `o m m 3 H m c J ¢ m a a �_ Q >c m ro w ID LU o � o S o i° my ro C) E m in CL I'm y c m _ O O - O in e m U_ y LL' E L M d 0 W d Cn 'm0 N 'a Z m m d o 'J w d0. d 0.2 H m w O O O z o J DOWN TO MONTEREY STREET MORRO STREET Blade:unna Day Spa �. w o. �•" _ w a x -- N °o H U. L=1 y J O w' 3 w CL cq 3 0 IS z V p. G m^o gg IZm� tam c.Et p'ffi c.a ✓ ' L Q z� v =° co -p]. Y CL J .0 'lC y tCC _ d. • . oz Z e"almWmm J � � ' I I I I I I CHORRO STREET IE J 2-15 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Key project elements on this level are described as follows: • Retail. Retail would include a total of 32,700 sf along Monterey Street, including the level's largest retail space of 12,120 sf in Building C; and 5,825-sf in Building D (existing 2,300-sf Moondoggies/2,300-sf Muzio's building plus 1,225-sf addition). • Pedestrian Access. Pedestrian access to the site's central plazas and other levels above would be provided via the main entrance stairway and adjacent ramp - located on Monterey Street between Buildings B and D, as well as other stairwells and elevators located throughout the site at this level. The main entrance stairway is located within close proximity to the existing mid-block crosswalk on Monterey Street, providing pedestrian access across Monterey Street. • Utility Area. A 2,440-sf utility area would be located at the rear of the retail spaces beneath the Central Plaza on the level above. • Service Access. The service driveway entrance on Morro Street would allow _ access to the solid waste and recycling facilities located at the rear.of Building C, adjacent to existing driveway access and parking for the Bladerunner and Full Circle Building. Other on-site delivery and loading would also be anticipated at - the service driveway. Vehicles would enter/exit Morro Street from this driveway; however, most delivery/loading _activities (e.g., trash pick-up) are anticipated to occur during early morning hours when fewer pedestrians would cause potential conflicts on the Morro Street sidewalk. • Street Trees. New street trees would include Queen Palms and Ficus. A total of 10 existing street trees would remain while two new street trees are proposed at this level. On the Monterey Street Level, the more significant changes from the previous project include: - • leaving about 26,000 sf of the northern subterranean portion of this level undeveloped, reducing excavation and eliminating the underground parking previously proposed in that northern portion of the property adjacent to Palm Street; • eliminating vehicle access for the hotel from Monterey Street and replacement with the main pedestrian entrance stairway and adjacent ramp to the site's central plazas and other levels above; • adding 1,225 sf to the rear of the existing Moondoggies/Muzio's building (Building D); 2-16 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 — J 1 J 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J • replacing restaurant and hotel use at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets (Building B) with retail spaces; J • retaining four additional street trees fronting Monterey Street; and J • retaining and adaptively reusing the Sauer Bakery (Building B-2) and Blackstone Hotel (Building B-1) in historical architectural styles. 2.3.2 Plaza Level The Plaza Level is the next level above the Monterey Street Level (Figure 2.3-2). The approximately 59,105-sf of structures on this level would support partial subterranean J parking along Palm Street, the second-stories of the retail, residential, and office uses J along Monterey Street, and lower-levels of proposed retail along Morro Street. Residential units along Monterey Street would include two moderate-income affordable dwelling units (Units #7 and #8). This level would also include the centerpiece of the J project, pedestrian plazas and walkways at approximately the center of the project site, J which would also allow access to the proposed hotel located on Palm Street Level I J above. The central plazas would be linked to Palm, Morro, and Monterey Streets by the pedestrian walkways. These open spaces would total 14,220 sf, approximately 7 percent of the project site. J Details of the Plaza Level are as follows: • Parking. A 28,000-sf partial subterranean parking structure would provide 74 private parking spaces to serve residents of proposed condominiums and hotel valet, and would have controlled access from Morro Street. J • Retail. Retail would include a total of 13,550 sf in Building B as a second story _D above Monterey Street, with entrances off the proposed plazas/walkways. In addition, retail spaces would be located at this level along the southern boundary D of Building A, accessible from the South Pedestrian Walkway. • Office. Office space on the Plaza Level would include 3,920 sf located in the J rear of Building C and 1,710 sf located in the rear of Building D above Monterey D Street, with access to the proposed plaza/walkway systems. D • Residential Units. Plaza Level residential units (second story above ground D fronting Monterey Street) would consist of one two-bedroom unit and one one- D bedroom unit totaling 2,240 sf in Building D and one two-bedroom and three D one-bedroom units totaling 3,950 sf in Building C. Two of these units (Units # 7 J and #8) are proposed to be designated for moderate-income households. D ^1 Chinatown Project 2-17 Final E/R Addendum—September 2009 D N �� a - \ - m O y ;O O w m3 0 m rn m m w o m > m Z m W x E m coo _ w �1 N C7 a m m - `o Z Y`p m m m g m ¢ 'E LU a 0 J n � v o m Q _ r�i 5 f J N N C N N m CJ C V U ) t6 LL C- m 11 in O d �O 'C m'' C 'C lL UO N Z y m N m J CL (L O W Q d m L CO Um 0 a) N U J r l O O ® w tit am 2 r m cr o ✓n O O O O O O O v c MORRO STREET DOWN TO MONTEREY STREET >W • Bladerunner Day Spa I (Monterey Street Level) 0. 3 I coon 'ate Full Circle CL (Monterey Street C Level) R m tu 20 t2 ° _ m a E+ � • • a O _ m d C �1 x 1�3Y O J 0 m R r M • g 0— m d U B 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 • 1 1 l y N 1 1 1 �i t0 1 1 Q a 1 1 1 1 / � n C w 4 1 � � W w S \ vN0 m � n �� tY West Pedestrian Walicwa t tiV v �C�+ I 3� _ _ Chop Suey T V (Palm Street Level) ay I aJ T 9 >.d I A J I 9 d A d I Ol a I yy N I L N d d J m q < ¢' I ?' I L\CSIt�Gnt131 CHORRO STREET 2-18 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J 1 J 1 Access would be provided by one elevator via the residential lobby located on the Plaza Level, as well as two stairways. Residential units would be set back off Monterey Street. J J • Plaza/Pedestrian Walkways. Two of the three total pedestrian walkways would link Monterey Street and Morro Street to the proposed retail, offices, and residences at this level. Pedestrian access from Morro Street would be provided by an on-grade walkway with steps down or a down-sloping ramp. This ramp is located mid-block and across the street and in direct view of a pedestrian entry/exit for an existing parking structure. Pedestrian access to other levels would be provided via stairwells and elevators located throughout the site, including the main entrance stairway to the Monterey Street Level below (between Buildings B and D). Pedestrian walkways would converge at the Central Plaza area. Walkway widths would generally range from 10 to 25 feet (not including benches, trash cans or other walkway amenities), while the central plaza area would be up to 58 feet wide (refer to Figure 2.2-3). The terraced Monterey Plaza at the Monterey Street entrance would accommodate outdoor seating. Landscaping would consist of large container pots (e.g., Giant Timber Bamboo, J Weeping Bottlebrush) and small planters (e.g., Horsetail Bamboo, Japanese Boxwood). Plaza amenities would include a variety of public art (e.g., art tile mosaics, seating benches, water features, and outside dining and seating in the jCentral and Monterey Plaza areas. ,� • Utility Area. Hotel utility and service areas at this level would include restaurant storage, hotel laundering, storage, and utility equipment located along j the western boundary of Building A, accessed from the parking garage and rear retail entrances. J J Major changes on the Plaza Level of the project would include: .J • replacing hotel uses at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets (Building B) -� with retail; • combining the two pedestrian walkways on either side of the existing Moondoggies/Muzio's building off Monterey Street into one between Buildings B and D; • adding the new terraced Monterey Plaza leading up to the Central Plaza; • replacing 2,240 sf of office space on the second floor of the Moondoggies/Muzio's building (Building D) with two residential units; and • replacing retail uses in Building C with office and residential units; ' • increasing setbacks for Buildings B, C, and D; 1 Chinatown Project 2-19 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 C 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION • eliminating live/work units; • increasing parking spaces at this level from 62 to 74 (overall project parking reduced from 122 to 74); and • adding hotel utility and service areas adjacent to the parking garage, and retail along the pedestrian walkway to Building A. 2.3.3 Palm Street Level 1 The Palm Street'Level I is the next level above the Plaza Level (approximately 25 feet above Monterey Street) and would generally be level with Palm Street (Figure 2.3-3). This approximately 41,566-sf level includes upper levels of the residential units along Monterey Street and the hotel and restaurant on Palm Street. This level also includes the West Pedestrian Walk which extends from the walkways/plazas located on the Plaza Level below to provide access to Palm Street and accommodate a 20-foot-wide fire lane C Details of the revised Palm Street Level 1 are as follows: • Hotel. The hotel at Palm Street Level 1 would include 23,430-sf and would consist of the ground-floor hotel lobby/lounge area, the upper level of the hotel spa, a detached hotel pavilion, the hotel banquet room fronting on the hotel inner courtyard, and the hotel pedestrian walkway/inner courtyard area with access to the South Pedestrian Walkway. This level would also contain the hotel's motor court for the vehicle drop-off and pick-up area at Palm Street, as well as a private pedestrian walkway entrance through the hotel into the site. • Restaurant. The hotel restaurant at the Palm Street Level would contain 5,000 s£ The restaurant would include exterior dining and a restaurant bar fronting Palm Street. • Residential Units. Palm Street Level 1 residential units (third story above ground fronting Monterey Street) would consist of four two-bedroom and two one-bedroom residences totaling 8,070 sf in Building C. Access would be provided by one elevator via the residential lobby located on the Plaza Level below, as well as two stairways. In addition, one three-bedroom and three two- bedroom residences totaling 5,705 sf would be located at this level in Building B fronting Chorro and Monterey Streets. Access to these residences would be provided by one elevator via the residential lobby located off Chorro Street on the Plaza Level below, as well as two stairways. { 2-20 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 E w � z x D _ o T 3 ca T '1 m J 3 T f0 v W o mm m Z 3 �, Y f� N a s m m m o 0Y a m m m .c COO ° .� J 'O It l>7 Cn '0 V m It vi W m ' E m m C CJ C Rf m W O U t6 C U O 0 M T f0 N LL CL tl w O a O C m -65 c m d Z CL d 0 W Q tl > � C N U J J O m m 0 m N wO Q w �2 � � o = N 0 000o O DOWN TO MONTEREY STREET MORRO STREET 30 J 711711717 I6laderunner Day Spa T (Monterey Street �w� � Y ; Level) c a Ql _ 'i •� Full Circle M1 fF- -91 m I� (Monterey Street it _ Level) a oy3 xN y 1 4u� Q � Q �'o ' o u , aU �a m � o ' d C N /� ii yy 1 -� a West Pedestrian Wxikway ® 4 i' u N • � ago w 0 W °= Chop Sury � a v a � � O J a c -� Resi 'nfial(Plaz Level) 1 J J CHORRO STREET J 1 2-21 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION • West Pedestrian Walk. The West Pedestrian Walk would consist of a street- level walkway/ramp from Palm Street located along the site's western boundary. This walkway would incorporate a "linear park" design, consisting of a series of landscape areas covered in low-water-consumption turf and in-ground planters and trees. Pedestrian access from Palm Street viathese walkways would be provided mid-block and across the street from and in view of a pedestrian access point to an existing parking structure. Walkway access would be provided via Palm Street down ramps which would converge at two plaza areas on the Plaza Level below. Walkway widths on this level would generally range from 20 to 25 feet to accommodate a 20-foot-wide fire lane. Pedestrian access to other levels would be provided via stairwells and elevators located throughout the site. • Street Trees. New street trees would include Queen Palms and Ficus. A total of three existing street trees would remain while one would be removed and replaced with a new tree along the project frontage on Morro Street. Along the project frontage on Palm Street, five new street trees would be planted while four would be removed. In addition, two street trees would be relocated to the Palm Street project frontage. Major changes on Palm Street Level 1 of the project would include: • replacing upper-story hotel uses at the corner of Chorro and Monterey Streets (Building B)with residential units; • replacing ground-floor retail and Central Court/walkway at the comer of Palm ` and Morro Streets (Building A) with the hotel; • eliminating live/work units along Morro Street; • incorporation or relocated street trees along the project frontage on Palm Street; • increasing setbacks for Buildings B and C; • replacing public pedestrian walkway and courtyard with hotel inner courtyard/ pedestrian walkway • increasing landscaping and incorporating the "linear park" design into the West Pedestrian Walk. 2.3.4 Palm Street Level 2 Palm Street Level 2 includes hotel rooms located in Buildings A-East and A-West above Palm Street Level 1 (second story above ground fronting Palm Street) (Figure 2.3-4). i^ 2-22 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 r� J J N 1�1 J m ca W Q m m C co J v W �/ > U S ! W ,j ZN J >. (� EO m H `\ LL W N ca 2 CW7 a 10 m y o ° p LU _ z m .. FP o W J y ¢_ ca mm 0 � _ ~N o � m y2 cn 2 a` o CPU o J z m m a o CD o o m MORRO STREET J , - D a Q Q 0 _ o Q � J W ` O wo v� U a ' OOO OOO .00 � c x,' CL vm gti OQOOOO �� Q Q 0. 000 _ 1 N N N N N p YJ • W I..-..-..-..-..�..-..�.. _ \gym z J CHORRO STREET F 2-23 1 L 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Details of the revised Palm Street Level 2 are as follows: • Hotel. The hotel at Palm Street Level 2 would include 26,500 sf and would consist,of the second floor of the three-story hotel. This level would include 39 hotel guest rooms, a fitness room, and an elevated walkway connecting to guest rooms between Building A-West and Building A-East. Guest rooms facing the interior of the project site and a large terrace would overlook the Hotel Inner Courtyard and pedestrian walkways below. Access would be provided by three elevators via the lobbies located on Palm. Street Level 1 below, as well as five stairways. r� Major changes on the Palm Street Level 2 of the project would include: • replacing upper-story residential uses at the comer of Palm and Morro streets (Building A) with hotel rooms; and • elimination of hotel rooms in Building B at the comer of Chorro and Monterey streets. j 2.3.5 Palm Street Level 3 Palm Street Level 3 includes hotel rooms located in Buildings A-East and A-West above Palm Street Level 2 (third story above ground fronting Palm Street) (Figure 2.3-5). This level also includes the rooftop pool/pool deck and viewing terrace of the hotel (Building A) fronting Palm Street (Figure 2.3-6). Details of the revised Palm Street Level 3 are as follows: • Hotel. The hotel at Palm Street Level 3 would include 26,500 sf and would consist of the third floor"of the three-story hotel. This level would include 39 hotel guest rooms, a fitness room, and an elevated walkway connecting to guest rooms between Building A-West and Building A-East. Guest rooms facing the interior of the project site and a large terrace would overlook the Hotel Inner Courtyard and pedestrian walkways below. Access would be provided by three = elevators via the lobbies located on Palm Street Level 2 below, as well as five stairways. • Hotel Roof Pool/Pool DeckNiewing Terrace. The 9,000-sf roof level above Palm Street Level 3 would include a pool and pool deck to serve hotel guests above Building A-West. The roof would also include solar photovoltaic panels and `Green Roof landscaping. In addition, a viewing terrace would be located l above Building A-East. Access would be provided by stairways from the floors below. 2-24 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 c� r w � m 9 ; • II ' II � 1 i � ''� ' ? }�'. ■ }k1 IIIIIIIIIIIII IIII�IIIIIII� ��IIIIIIIII�I k Milli N+ ill j s J i J 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION J J 1 Major changes on this level of the project include: J 1 • replacing upper-story residential uses at the comer of Palm and Morro streets (Building A) with hotel rooms; and • relocating the hotel pool from the roof of Building B at the comer of Chorro and J Monterey streets to the roof of Building A-West at Palm and Morro streets. Tables 2.3-1 and 2.3-2 provide a comparison between the types of commercial and residential uses proposed on each of the project levels under the previous and revised J projects. Commercial, hotel, residential, and parking spaces would mainly be located on the first three levels with the upper two levels consisting of hotel. Figures 2.3-7 and 2.3-8 display the proposed project elevations from surrounding streets. Figures 2.3-9 and 2.3-10 display proposed project cross sections. J Table 2.3-1. Comparison of Commercial Area (Square Footage) by Floor Level PREVIOUS PROJ- ECT _ . ;REVISED PROJECT Level Retail .Restaurant Office Hotel Retail I Restaurant Office I Hotel .i' Monterey Street 18,800 6,000 16,000 32,700 Plaza 7,450 4,600 15,000 18,450 1,000 5,630 -� Palm Street 1 17,500 1 21,500 5,000 23,430 Palm Street 2 14,500 26,500 'J Palm Street 3 26,500 Palm Roof 9,000 Subtotal 1 43,7501 6,000 1 4,600 1 67,000 51,150 6,000 5,630 85,430 ✓' TOTAL 121,350 148,210 COMMERCIAL t Chinatown Project 2-27 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 C 2.0 REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Table 2.3-2. Comparison of Residential Area (Square Footage) by Floor Level PREVIOUS'PROJECT: REVISED PROJECT Level -Residential . Uv Work. —Parking' Residential -1_.LiveLWork_ I Parkin ' Monterey Street 28,400 2,440 Plaza 28,000 6,025 28,000 6 units Palm Street 1 6,400 4,000 13,136 6 units 4 units 10 units 1"Residential/ 25,470 Palm Street 2 (16 units) 2°d Residentiat/ 21,700 Palm Street 3 (10 units) Subtotal 53,570 I 4,000 56,400 19,161 30,440 TOTAL 113,970 49,601 RESIDENTIAL Parking would accommodate both residential and hotel uses. Source: SLO Chinatown LLC 2007;2009. r , 2-28 Chinatown Project i Fina!E/R Addendum—September 2009 — J N J 1 J l�iiu; � v'd ui I " � c u • W Z pp W U m on �7 C 3 w •� JJ i� �m�.c�.� a J ^ � ;�• v r Ic � � r > . 2x O J m , =cn w C -��' CL .. � m go rn � m c B®� c � ® ' o bym c c ��o u U. c > O V 13 G 3 0 o W c As C3c r. a r � C Lcl 1 d in I r c i I a 2-29 J O N A fpr LL _ J o W [. ow --T d' V - O }(Lilt : Jk 70 -+O'•C'V •- pl Y LD 4 ars La N' N (v c m O E-� , d �' t' ISI N W lC 0 d - � L 0-1cmO 4P LL .O O 4).0 _t u W al �J• ? d n N �I w a a cj. -L�- ` r v(�n 2-30 C 1 e 1 FI a , ] C#j ul J -m LL V i a W O J N 1 �Y J y � 0(n LUJ J 0 O L L o o v � d N i C 0 N — m J - Z O � � 3 :2 c B. J .. O« o� .20 F; q 0 iN Odi p L co 02 U fa _ O U Ir 000 d ./ VIS3 IEE L -i Cb C� Dtl,�� hy� a-i m t J J. J �' 2-31 l` COO W My LL m 01. n A m o - = 1 054 ° � U r.:�I •�rY V - I m A > Til .. o Al m -..7 C m Z C _ F41' r a o N W g—� d ° _ � U O O CL v s U i 2-32 / 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1 J 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 OVERVIEW This section focuses on the most significant changes to the key issue areas identified in the Chinatown Project Final EIR/Final EIR Update and includes a comparison table of J key impacts and mitigation measures associated with the previously proposed and revised project. In particular, this section focuses on those impacts which may have changed from significant to insignificant or where recommended mitigation measures may have been altered. In general, reductions'in project size, height, scale and incorporation of ® adaptive reuse of historic structures along with other changes identified in Section 2.0, have led to reductions in the severity of project impacts. The discussion in this Final EIR Addendum should be used in conjunction with the discussion in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update to understand the impacts of the amended Chinatown Project and changes in required mitigation measures. The original Chinatown Final EIR (September 2007) identified unavoidable and significant environmental impacts associated with Aesthetics and Visual Resources associated with project size, bulk, and scale and changes to Downtown character. In addition, impacts to Cultural Resources were also considered unavoidable and significant 1 due to loss of historic buildings and the project inconsistency with the character of the Downtown Historic District. Although the Final EIR also identified multiple additional J impacts, these two issues prompted a redesign of the project to address these issues. That redesigned project, as assessed in the Chinatown Project Final EIR Update (November 2007), was smaller in height and scale and resulted in reduced impacts to Aesthetics and Visual Resources and Cultural Resources of the project. The Final EIR Update concluded that several impacts and associated mitigation measures related to visual and cultural resources were no longer applicable and could be eliminated. The revised 1 project in the Final EIR Update forms the basis for comparison of the environmental impacts of the current and most recent project revisions analyzed below. 1 1 Chinatown Project 3-1 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 1 3.O REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES' 3.2 MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 3.2.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources The revised Chinatown Project would generally maintain the vertical dimension of the previous design, with three- to four-story buildings not exceeding 50 feet in height above average natural grade. Overall project size and scale, however, would be reduced by greater upper-story setbacks. The distribution of project area would also change L significantly, with an approximately 64 percent reduction in residential square footage, and an increase in proposed retail, office, and hotel square footage (approximately 17, 22, and 28 percent, respectively). The revised project would also include a reconfiguration — of the proposed internal pedestrian plaza/walkway system with a majority of the system open to the public, but with a smaller potion occasionally prioritized for hotel uses (refer to Figure 2.2-3). The reduction in overall size, scale, and bulk would allow the project to be more compatible with the character of this portion of downtown San Luis Obispo, given its location in both the Chinatown and the Downtown Historic Districts. As a result, the revised project would further reduce impacts on aesthetics and visual resources as compared to the previous design. Impact VIS-1, associated with height and mass of proposed multi-story structures, would be further reduced and would remain less than significant under the revised project. Impacts to architectural compatibility described under Impact VIS-2 would also be reduced and would remain less than significant with implementation of required mitigation measures described in mitigation measure MM VIS-2. Impact VIS-3 and. the previously required mitigation measures addressing nighttime light and glare would remain unchanged. Changes to aesthetics and visual resources impacts are summarized below. Impact VIS-1. The proposed project has been revised to include adaptive reuse of the Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel (Building B-1) and the Sauer Bakery (Building B-2). Although the proposed hotel located in Building A at the comer of Palm and Morro streets would be up to four stories in height fronting the internal pedestrian walkway system, the Palm Street frontage would be three stories above the ground level of the adjacent street, with maximum elevations of up to 50 feet. In addition, proposed commercial and residential uses in Building B, the reconstructed Blackstone Hotel and Sauer Bakery buildings, would remain three stories in height with the upper levels further set back off Monterey Street to reduce overall project size, height, and scale and 3-2 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 r 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES r r minimize shading. These changes would keep the visual impacts below the threshold of r significance, and it would remain a less than significant impact. r r Impact VIS-2. Regarding architectural style, the proposed structures would remain r compatible with the Main Street character of the Downtown Historic District along Monterey Street. Under the amended project, the Sauer Bakery and the Cornerstone 1 J Building/historic Blackstone Hotel would, be retained and adaptively reused to pay homage to the late 1800s-early 1900s architecture of the original Quintana Building r (rather than retain the Streamline Modern fagade). In addition, elements of Chinese r architecture have been incorporated into parts of the proposed contemporary project r design located within the Chinese Historic District, specifically along Palm and Chorro r streets, including Chinese `Key Pattern' or `Thunder Pattern' glass motif, balcony r railings with Chinese `Eight Diagrams' patterns, a wood screen `Lantern', `Celadon Green' cement plaster, `Cracked Ice' glazing, bamboo lattice, `Ah Louis' brick, and r public art with etched graphic historical imagery. Architectural detailing would r incorporate variation in roof and parapet heights, articulated roof/wall junctures with added cornice treatments and trellis components, regular and vertically articulated r window pattern, articulated and highlighted entries,and increased upper floor balconies and projections. The revised project would also include reuse of the historic Shanghai r Low Restaurant sign in the Central Plaza area. However, although these changes would substantially improve the project's compatibility r with the character of the Downtown, due to the project's sensitive location, submittal of a r physical architectural model under mitigation measure MM VIS-2 (1) would still be required for final Architectural Review Commission (ARC) review. Therefore, impacts associated with architectural compatibility with the surrounding area would be reduced r and would remain less than significant with incorporation of mitigation. r . r Mitigation Measures. As with the previous project design, mitigation measures r MM VIS-la, MM VIS-lb, MM VIS-2 (2) through (4) in the Final EIR would not apply r to the revised Chinatown Project. All other mitigation measures associated with r aesthetics and visual resources identified in the Chinatown Final EIR would still be r required. r A digital 3-D model of proposed buildings would also be provided as part of the revised project. 1 Chinatown Project 3-3 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Residual Impacts. Residual impacts under the revised project would be less than significant. - 3.2.2 Cultural Resources C The revised Chinatown Project would incorporate several cultural resources that were not included in the previous project design, and as such would have reduced impacts on cultural resources. Under the amended project, the Sauer Bakery and the Cornerstone C Building/historic Blackstone Hotel would be retained and adaptively reused to pay homage to the architecture of the original Quintana Building (rather than retain the Streamline Modern facade). In addition, elements of Chinese architecture have been incorporated into parts of the proposed contemporary project design located within the Chinese Historic District, specifically along Pahn and Chorro streets, including Chinese `Key Pattern' or `Thunder Pattern' glass motif, balcony railings with Chinese `Eight r Diagrams' patterns, a wood screen `Lantern', `Celadon Green' cement plaster, `Cracked - Ice' glazing, bamboo lattice, `Ah Louis' brick, and public art with etched graphic historical imagery. However, the project would still include demolition of two buildings identified as contributing resources to historic preservation districts (Bello's and Palm Street buildings). Impacts CR-1 and CR-8 would remain less than significant with implementation of feasible mitigation measures as described in the Final EIR. Impact CR-2 would remain - significant and unavoidable as descried in the Final EIR. Impacts CR-3 and CR-6 would remain less than significant under the revised project with alterations to required mitigation measures from the Final EIR. The retention and adaptive reuse of the Sauer Bakery Building would reduce Impact CR-4 to less than significant. However, impacts CR-5 and CR-7 would remain significant and unavoidable as a result of demolition or alteration of historic structures as discussed in the Final EIR and mitigation measures would still be required. Changes to.cultural resources impacts are discussed below. Impact CR-3. The revised project includes a new addition at the Monterey Street Level to the rear of the historic Muzio's Building, an NRNP-eligible property included on the City's Master List of Historic Resources. Similar to the previous project design, the existing wood stairway and decks at the rear would be removed. As discussed in the Final EIR, there is no historical documentation of the rear exterior stairway, and building - permits suggest that this feature has been altered over the years. Therefore, these 34 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 P 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES stairways do not contribute to the building's significance, and alteration of these exterior 1 1 stairways would not diminish the integrity of the building. 1 The revised project would also eliminate the pedestrian walkway, previously proposed on the east side of the Muzio's Building; proposed Building C would instead abut the ® building's existing eastern fagade. Historically, the eastern fagade of this structure has been hidden by adjacent buildings, and since this wall is not considered a defining element of the structure, impacts would not be significant. J 1 Under the revised project, the new rear addition would also impact the existing rear exterior entrance at the Monterey Level, which characterizes the spatial relationship of 1 the building. To be consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, "new additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the 1 property" (Weeks and Grimmer 1995). Therefore, the new addition would be acceptable as long as the current exterior wall would be incorporated as an interior wall. This action would preserve current fenestration which is a character defining feature of this building. 1 Therefore, with alterations to mitigation measures, impacts to this historic resource would remain less than significant. Impact CR-4. The revised project would not demolish the Sauer Bakery Building which 1 is included on the City's Master List of Historic Resources; rather, the building would be ' adaptively reused. Reuse would entail the following activities: 1 .• The wall of the Sauer Bakery Building along Monterey Street is constructed of wood frame and would be remodeled to recreate the window openings that ® occurred with the original building configuration—six double hung windows. e The original bracketed cornice, which was removed with the street widening, ' would be recreated as closely as possible to the original scale and detail. • The existing windows along the northeast fagade of the Sauer Bakery Building ' would be retained in their existing location and reconditioned or reconstructed as necessary. • . New horizontal siding would be provided at the Monterey Street fagade to ' recreate the original character of the Sauer Bakery Building. ' C The unreinforced brick rear building of the Sauer Bakery would be strengthened ' and seismically retrofitted. Chinatown Project 3-5 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 1 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES • The ovens which exist in the rear of the Sauer Bakery Building would remain intact with no modifications proposed. • All floors within the existing buildings would be strengthened and leveled to accommodate accessibility and new uses. The significance of the Sauer Bakery building was determined based on its association with a family and a business important in San Luis Obispo history rather than its architectural integrity. Therefore, reuse of the Sauer Bakery building under the revised project, as described above, would reduce impacts to this historic resource from - significant and unavoidable to less than significant. However, the building would be subject to historic documentation procedures related to its location within the Downtown Historic District (see discussion under Impact CR-7). Impact CR-5. Although the Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel would no longer be demolished under the revised Chinatown Project, two buildings identified as contributing resources to. historic preservation districts (Bello's and Palm Street Buildings) would still be demolished. Subsequent hearings before the Cultural Heritage Committee (CHC) and City Council concluded that these two buildings could be demolished subject to approved mitigation measures related to proper historical documentation procedures. Similar to the previously evaluated version of the project, demolition of these two contributing structures would result in impacts that remain significant and unavoidable. Consistent with EIR Mitigation Measure MM CR-5 requiring the incorporation of building details as well as portions of existing construction into the new construction, the CHC and City Council reviewed historical reports at the end of 2008 that were commissioned specifically to identify what the key remaining significant character- C defining features of both the Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings were and determine what features needed to be retained within the revised project.2 The City Council C concluded the Blackstone's Ah Louis bricks needed to be reused within the revised C project. c The revised project would go far beyond this minimum threshold established by the City Council to incorporate specific details and character derived from the late 1800s-early Z Please refer to the City's website for comprehensive documentation on history and architectural analysis of the Blackstone and Sauer Bakery buildings. 3-6 Chinatown Project Final E!R Addendum—September 1009 r L I. J 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES J 1900s architecture of the original building. With the seismic retrofit and remodel of the J Blackstone, the proposal would be to return the building architecture to the style of the Quintana Building with the Italian Swiss facade remaining a distinct element along 1 Chorro Street. The building would remain at three levels—as opposed to the original two-story Quintana Building—with the upper floor stepped back along Chorro Street for the Quintana portion of the street elevation. The currently proposed adaptive reuse of the Cornerstone Building/historic Blackstone Hotel would entail the following: J • The wall of the Blackstone along Chorro Street, because it is relatively intact structurally and is part of the original building construction, would remain and be reinforced and seismically strengthened. Seismic strengthening would consist of a combination of steel moment frames, steel wall girtsibraces, and floor and roof ' anchors to tie the buildings' horizontal diaphragms to the exterior walls. 1 • New floor sheathing would be installed over floor framing as necessary to strengthen the floor and/or roof diaphragms. J • The existing wall of the Blackstone along Monterey Street would be removed and j rebuilt to resemble the architecture of the 1874-1913 Quintana Building in a similar scale utilizing details such as window fenestration and opening alignments as closely as reasonably possible to the original. • Building trim, window proportions, and fagade details are based on existing 1 historical photos. These have been used to establish the design details and 1 proportions and would be used throughout the project to replicate as closely as possible the original character. The current proposal to seismically strengthen and adaptively reuse the Blackstone Hotel building exceeds the City Council's minimum threshold of retaining the Ah Louis bricks as the building's character-defining feature within the project. Therefore, reuse of the Blackstone Hotel building under the revised project, as described above, would lessen the / impacts to this historic resource; however, the impacts would remain significant. 1 ' Impact CR-6. The revised project includes relocation of the historic Shanghai Low Restaurant neon sign on Palm Street in the Chinatown Historic District to the proposed Central Plaza area on the Sauer Bakery building. Although the sign would be retained 1 and visible from Palm Street up the West Pedestrian Walk, it was previously found that its location along the Palm Street frontage is important in retaining its historic context. The relocation of the sign would leave only one of the three neon signs that ever existed J ' in the Chinatown area on Palm Street. Therefore, mitigation measure MM CR-6 from the Chinatown Project 3-7 Fina!E7R Addendum-September 2009 J 1 J' 1_ 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Chinatown Project Final EIR, to incorporate the sign into new construction on Palm _ Street in the general area of its current location, would be required to reduce impacts to _ less than significant. Impact CR-7. The revised Chinatown Project would still require the demolition or alteration of contributing structures to the Chinatown and Downtown Historic Districts; - the Bello's and Comerstone/historic Blackstone Hotel buildings in the Downtown Historic District and the Palm Street Building in the Chinatown Historic District. The redesign of the project would incorporate subtle Chinese-inspired architectural elements into parts of the proposed project located within the Chinese Historic District; however, `- impacts as a result of proposed demolition, alteration, or removal of these contributing structures would result in a significant impact to the integrity of the Chinatown Historic - District on Palm Street and the Monterey Street corridor of the Downtown Historic District. The revised project would not require demolition the Sauer Bakery Building; - however, the building would be altered for adaptive reuse. Since the loss of contributing buildings would materially affect the districts' ability to convey their historical l significance, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable, even after mitigation. - Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measure MM CR-3 would be modified under the revised project to ensure rehabilitation of the Muzio's Building consistent with the - Secretary of Interior's Standards for rehabilitation, including incorporation of the current - rear exterior wall as an interior wall to preserve the current fenestration and character defining feature of the building. Mitigation measure MM CR-4 would no longer apply. Mitigation measure MM CR-6 from the Chinatown Project Final EIR would be required - under the revised project to ensure the Shanghai Low neon sign is incorporated into new - construction on Palm Street. Mitigation measure MM CR-7 and all other mitigation - measures associated with cultural resources identified in the Chinatown Project Final EIR/Final EIR Update would still be required. - Residual Impacts. Residual impacts to Cultural Resources associated with the revised project would remain unavoidable and significant as identified in the Chinatown Project - Final EIR/Final EIR Update. C t 3-8 Chinatown Project Fina/EIR Addendum-September 2009 J J ' 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.2.3 Population and Housing Population and housing impacts from the revised Chinatown Project would be increased J as project employment opportunities would be increased and because the revised project 1 includes two fewer affordable residential units set aside for moderate-income households. Although project-related impacts discussed under Impact PH-1, including the City 1 affordable housing imbalance would be increased by the revised project, they would remain less than significant. Project-related impacts discussed under Impact PH-2 in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update were removed, per direction from the Council, as they were 1 no longer necessary in light of the revised project description that included deed- restricted affordable housing units, consistent with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Similar to the previous project, the revised project also includes affordable housing units consistent with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Therefore, Impact PH-2 no longer applies. Changes in impacts and mitigation measures related to population and housing are summarized below. Impact PH-1. Using the same means of calculation as described in the Final EIR, the revised project's job/housing ratio (Table 3.2-1) would increase from the previous project design, which was 1.66. Although retail and office space is increased over the previous 1 project design, this increase in the ratio is largely due to the reduction in residential units. J Table 3.2-1. Jobs/Housing Ratio - - - --Number Revised of tDevelopmentTXpe - __ --._ Workers per Unit_ Project . - Workers Retail 3.0 per 1,000 square feet(sf) 51,150 sf 153.5 Office 4.0 per 1,000 sf 5,630 sf 22.5 Services and Manufacturing 2.6 per 1,000 sf 6,000 sf 15.6 Motel/Hotel 0.39 per room 78 rooms 30.4 Total 222 Proposed Residential Units= 16 Jobs/Housing Ratio' =6.25 ' Assumes average household size of 2.219 persons/household. ' Chinatown Project 3-9 Final EIA Addendum-September 2009 1 1 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES This increase would result in greater inconsistency with the City's Land Use Element Growth Management Policy LU 1.4; however, though the revised project's contribution, to the jobs/housing imbalance would increase from the previous project design, this imbalance would still not rise to the level of significance. The revised project in itself is a large mixed-use development that would provide housing opportunities, including limited affordable housing, as well as increased employment. Although the project would create more jobs than residences, it still ultimately moves toward the City's goal - of increasing housing supply as well as providing downtown housing. As previously discussed in the Final EIR, the number of jobs created is not directly related to the number of new potential residents. Overall, the revised project would not cause a - significant change in the overall job/housing ratio for San Luis Obispo. Mitigation Measures.. Mitigation measures associated with population and housing identified in the Chinatown Project Final EIR would remain unchanged. Residual Impacts. Similar to the previous project, residual impacts associated with the revised project would be less than significant. 3.2.4 Transportation and Traffic The revised Chinatown Project would be approximately 84 percent of the size of the previous project design and as such would have slightly reduced impacts on transportation and traffic. Project-related trip generation would be incrementally decreased in the PM peak hour (Table 3.2-2), along with associated project-related traffic on downtown streets, and traffic impacts would remain less than significant. Parking demand associated with on-site uses would be reduced (Table 3.2-3), along with the proposed supply of on-site parking, although the impacts associated with the loss of public parking and the limitations of on-site parking to serve all the intended users would remain substantially the same as discussed in the Final EIR. Project-related impacts discussed under Impacts TT-1, TT-2, TT-4, TT-5, TT-6, TT-8, and TT-9, and TT-10, including intersection LOS, construction, bicycle, motorcycle, transit, safety, and emergency access-related impacts, would remain substantially the same as discussed in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update, and the previously required mitigation measures would remain unchanged. Changes in project impacts associated with pedestrian facilities and parking demand are summarized below, along with changes to Impacts TT-3 and TT-7. 3-10 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 r 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES J J J Table 3.2-2. Revised PM Peak-Hour Project Trip Generation Rates and Estimates Tri .Generation Rates_ Tri Generation Estintates Land Use Size` In . out Total In Out Total Proposed Uses 1 Condominium UnitS2 15 du 0.36 0.22 0.58 5.4 3.3 8.7 1 Boutique Hotel' 78 rooms 0.25 0.26 0.51 19.5 20.3 39.8 J Meeting Facility° 3,000 sf N/A N/A N/A 0 75 75 Restaurants 6,000 sf 5.02 2.47 7.49 30 15 45 Retail6 51,150 sf 1.80 1.95 3.75 92.1 99.7 191.8 Office' 5,630 sf 0.25 1.24 1.49 1.4 7 8.4 1 Subtotal 148.4 220.3 368.7 Existing Uses J Cornerstone Realty? 1,300 sf 0.25 1.24 1.49 0 2 2 Photo 1016 1.100 sf 1.80 1.95 3.75 2 2 4 Costume CaperS8 1,675 sf 1.92 1.91 3.83 3 3 6 BelloY 3,600 sf 1.92 1.91 3.83 7 7 14 Palm St.Commercial6 3,400 sf 1.80 1.95 3.75 6 7 13 Subtotal 18 21 39 25%Project Internalization Reduction 31 29 59 25%Existing Uses Internalization Reduction 5 4 9 Total Net New Trips under Revised Project 94 166 262 Total Net New Trips under Previous Project 100 165 265 1 J Difference in New Net Trips (6) 1 (3) / Notes: du=dwelling units;sf=square feet 2 High-rise condominium/townhome(ITE land use code 232);PM equation:T=0.34(X)+ 15.47 }Hotel(ITE land use code 310);PM equation:Ln(T)= 1.20 Ln(X)-1.55 Based on City parking requirements. s Quality restaurant(ITE land use code 931);average rates used. ' 6 Shopping center(ITE land use code 820);average rates used. 7 General office(ITE land use code 710);average rates used. 8 Apparel store(ITE land use code 870);average rates used. 9 Reduction taken for restaurant and retail uses only. Where T=average trip ends and X=number of units(measured in dwelling units or 1,000 sf). / Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers 2003. ' Chinatown Project 3-11 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 1 i 3.0 REyLSED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Table 3.2-3. Revised Vehicle Parking Requirements New Stalls Land Use/Size _ _Standard Stalls Required Provided _ Proposed Uses 6 1-bedroom condominiums 1 per unit 6 9 2-bedroom condominiums 1 per unit 9 I 3-bedroom condominiums 1.25 per unit 1.25 - Residential complex (guest)parking 0.1 per unit 1.6 Residential Subtotal 17.85 20 78-room boutique hotel .5 per room/suite+ 40 .5 per manager 2,800 sf meeting room I per 350 sf 8 6,000 sf restaurant 1 per 350 sf 17 51,150 sf retail I per 500 sf 102.3 r 3,000 sf hotel spa I per 500 sf' 6 5,630 sf office 1 per 500 sf 11.3 I. Non-Residential Subtotal 184.6 54 Estimated Project Parking Demand 202.4 Credit for Existing Uses (95) - -Occupied square footage-22 spaces -Unoccupied square footage- 73 spaces Total Net New Parking Demand 107 74 'Number of spa personnel used in determining parking demand has not been determined at this time;therefore,the - retail standard has been applied. This would constitute a worst-case scenario since some of the customers would be overlapping with hotel patrons. Note: Bicycle and motorcycle parking space requirements would be reduced under the revised project. Revised bicycle requirements would include 31 long-term spaces for residential, 14 short-term spaces for customers,and r I I long-term spaces for employees and 2 spaces which could be short-or long-term. Revised motorcycle requirements would include 10 spaces. Impacts to bicycle and motorcycle parking would remain less than significant with implementation of existing mitigation measures(MM TT-4 and MM TT-5). Sources:City of San Luis Obispo 2004;SLO Chinatown LLC 2009. Impact TT-3. Because of the reduction in residential units under the revised project (from 36 to 16 units), pedestrian activity and associated potential for sidewalk congestion _ would be reduced overall, and would not be significant. However, contributions to sidewalk congestion from retail (employees increased from 131 to 154 and area increased from 43,750 to 51,150 sf) and hotel (increased from 67 rooms to 78 rooms) could result in localized congestion at certain points in the project area. Under the revised project, the site's public pedestrian network, planned always to be open to the public, would be reduced in area (15 percent of the total site area versus the former 26 percent) and 3-12 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 P 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1 connectivity (three walkways versus the former five and two plazas versus the former three)3. Since the revised project includes retention of the existing historic buildings along Chorro Street, the sidewalk along this frontage is limited in the ability to meet the 8-foot minimum pedestrian passage goal. However, this would be addressed by mitigation 1 measure MM TT-3a, as modified in the Final EIR Update. The revised project plans also 1 indicate the inclusion of sidewalk dining, street furniture, and landscaping on the proposed pedestrian walkways/plazas. This could potentially restrict available effective pedestrian passage, resulting in congestion within proposed plazas and walkways. This would be mitigated by MM TT-3h, as modified in the Final EIR Update. Therefore, similar to the previous project, impacts to pedestrian facilities would remain less than significant with incorporation of mitigation. Impact TT-7. Although overall project parking demand would be slightly reduced as summarized in Table 3.2-3, parking impacts identified in Impact TT-7 would remain 1 substantially unchanged. The revised project would no longer exceed City ordinance 1 requirements for provision of on-site parking by constructing 74 subterranean parking spaces (33 less than ordinance requirements); in addition, no parking would be provided for the general public or employees. Employees and patrons that drive would rely on the adjacent parking structures and on-street spaces for parking. The project would also continue to have the potential to impact on-street parking supply as discussed in the Final 1 EIR, dependent upon the final configuration of area sidewalk improvements and commercial loading zones. Finally, impacts associated with displacement of 155 existing public and private parking spaces would remain unchanged, leading to substantially ® increased demand for parking within the adjacent Palm Street public parking structures, which would still exceed the available effective supply of parking spaces within these 1 structures. 1 Per the City's Zoning Ordinance Regulations, the revised project, with 74 proposed on- site spaces, would technically result in a deficit of 33 spaces on site. However, this surplus does not take into account the loss of the 155 on-site public and private parking spaces or the restricted availability of the 74 spaces proposed. Section 17.16.060G of the ' City's Zoning Regulations states that "the right to occupy and use any premises shall be 3 The project-would also include a hotel courtyard/pedestrian walkway which is proposed to be available to the public much of the time,when not in use for hotel exclusive events. ' Chinatown Project 3-13 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 3.O REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES contingent on presenting the required parking and maintaining its availability to the residents, staff, and/or customers." Adding the deficit of 33 spaces to the 155 on-site parking spaces lost results in a net increase in demand of 188 parking spaces associated with implementation of the proposed project (Table 3.2-4). As noted in the Final EIR, the 919 Palm Street and 842 Palm Street parking structures have approximately 118 spaces available on a typical weekday. Similar to the previously proposed project, the shortfall of spaces associated with displacement of existing public parking and increased public demand would exceed the capacity of the existing parking structures, which would — constitute a significant impact. This would be mitigated to less than significant with - implementation of required mitigation measures. Table 3.2-4. Revised Parldng Estimates Summary ` `-- Factors Influencing Parking Net Project Project Parking Net Unmet Calculations Parking.Demand Provided Credits. Parkin &t g - _ Demand Parking Demand Per City Code 202 Displaced Surface Parking 155 Existing Use Credit Per City Code 95 Proposed Spaces 74 Totals 358 169 188 Note: Assumes 130 juror spaces are unavailable for general public use(refer to Table 3.10-9 in Chinatown Project Final EIR). Mitigation Measures. All mitigation measures associated with transportation and traffic identified in the Final EIR/Final EIR Update would still be required. Residual Impacts. As with the previous project design in the Final EIR Update, residual impacts associated with the revised project would be reduced to less than significant after implementation of mitigation measures. C C C C r C 3-14 Chinatown Project C Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 J J 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES J Table 3.2-5. Comparison Summary of Impact Determination for Major Issues 1 Original Impact Description Previous Pro'ect Revised Pro'ect ' Aesthetics and Visual Resources VIS-I Visual impacts,in terms of the compatibility of height Class III Impacts Class III Impacts and mass of the proposed mixed-use structure(Building A) and hotel(Building B),are significant and unavoidable. VIS-2 The proposed project could generate significant visual Class ll Impacts Class II Impacts impacts associated with architectural compatibility with the surrounding area. Cultural Resources CR-3 The proposed project would result in potentially Class III Impacts Class II Impacts significant impacts to a historic resource eligible for listing on 1 the National Register of Historic Places,as a result of alterations to the Muzio's Building located at 868-870 JMonterey Street° CR-4 The proposed project would result in significant and Class I Impacts Class III Impacts unavoidable impacts to a historic resource included on the City's Master List of Historic Resources,as a result of ' demolition of the Sauer Bakery Building located at 848 Monterey Street. CR-5 The proposed project would result in significant and Class I Impacts Class I Impacts unavoidable impacts to three historic resources that are contributing elements to recognized historic districts as a result of proposed demolition. CR-6 The proposed project would result in significant Class III Impacts Class II Impacts impacts to a contributing element of a recognized historic 1 district as a result of demolition of the Shanghai Low i Restaurant sign located at 861 Palm Street.I CR-7 The proposed project would result in significant Class I Impacts Class I Impacts impacts to the Chinatown Historic District and the Downtown ' Historic District as a result of the demolition of contributing structures. ' Population and Housing PH-1 The proposed project may increase the gap between Class III Impacts Class III Impacts housing demand and supply,conflicting with Growth Management Policy LU 1.4,and may exacerbate the affordable ' housing imbalance in the City of San Luis Obispo. Transportation and Traffic TT-3 The proposed project could result in potentially Class II Impacts Class U Impacts significant impacts to pedestrian facilities and pedestrian safety. 1 1 1 1 ' Chinatown Project 3-15 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 3.0 REVISED PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Table 3.2-5. Comparison Summary of Impact Determination for Major Issues (Continued) Original Impact Description. Previous Rro'ect Revised Project . Transportation and Traffic(Continued) TT-7 The proposed project would result in potentially Class II Impacts Class II Impacts significant impacts to the public parking supply due to the loss — of existing public metered parking on the project site and on streets adjacent to the project site combined with a substantial increase in demand from the proposed project(in excess of proposed on-site parking). Notes: Class I Impacts—Significant,Unavoidable Impacts That May Not Be Fully Mitigated to Less Than Significant Levels Class 11 Impacts—Significant Impacts That Can Be Mitigated To Less Than Significant Levels Cass III Impacts—Impacts That Are Adverse But Less Than Significant 'These impacts were originally identified as a potentially significant(Class II)in the Chinatown Project Final EIR (September 2007),but were modified to adverse,but less than significant impacts(Class III)in the Final EIR Update due to changes in project design. I� I _ r� l� i 3-16 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES J / 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 1 4.1 OVERVIEW jThe following revised impact summary tables re lace the Executive Summary Impact Tables (ES-1 through ES-3) in the Chinatown Project Final EIR/Final EIR Update in its entirety. The revisions in this section reflect the results of the analyses summarized in ® Section 3.0 for changes to impacts to major issue areas such as Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Cultural Resources, and Transportation and Traffic. In addition, minor adjustments to important impacts and mitigation measures are reflected here. / 1 J / 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 Chinatown Project 4-1 Final EIR Addendum—September 1009 1 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES I - a, m_❑ vyi •h L.O. � C ^J = 3 td - - uU O i3 OV V ro (EL) 40 0 Z O '� •N V 'O E DE ° . and •E E R o n o Q 'ti E o4 . EWE E ' - '�.i =? O '� a •- cid ❑ p m a to s to m _ Vi L• 4 E ° L N L V fi 1: G. "3 >1�E V O y - O to z T a •i b=0 T .VC =1 QX c>a .L y > 'o o U aa) ty ca c ° • ° ° :? E E ° E :n 3 U - c .- y a) .? N rJ a, p _ c ' c y o c tz E °c_°^ ° _ = y ti v d C3 ° ° E ° o c ami c° � Rb �_ c a c a� E °>' � d a n a a L a) - p• _ e >o .E3u ^ a'c E > aci �° ate' � " a°i ° - � •° �+ to E E .o ai '? y p ° b > x ..c ° F" 3 y .� s s ai ca O a) a) U cc V V O 0 C '� s E Y c Q _ to p ° a N aj N y a c .> ° o > E a, c a a Q o a n _> 'y c ° ° a a a R o E o Q '6"- 9 9 `` E v o ► F E ° ° c ' L a E ° - a a y c s � U o a 3 aj o lu ou "p ato to a 3 m a m 3 n p a Lr W1 m a ° 3 0 ° '� 3 ° m ° �° ¢ s E o c - Cy .� av a C. E o :. O' V N >,•-- O 00 'fl — I- �C C. a V �. C� m .� '7 M Q Q c u Mx o . cv c6 h :? - = _ o ^> eomrx a� > L? a - t; w c`n a"i Q y L 1.• � � E sz. -- GM n W2 y 0O •.il � � y H a _ 0 0 C C ° Uj - Co 0 rr CC ca '0 T - a m O p v L m a s o -0sG - 3 9 m Q .0w: d - o > •N N aco o M Q =a � � o Chinatown Project 4-2 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES R Z ® H y h t � � ° E w _ as -m i R O r c Cc 10� o Q rn 01> 3 an ° i aU w t as � E 0v '� � � � .a • O cs > _ � —y G,°= °' y ai � — a=i a> 0ZU ros ca = Z ti '- ca = — _ N N °Q U N cc p fV U O .V 00 = U U E c>a = b E -O = U -�.� v CU O p p vi tiw E ° s = a a° E p a00 3Oa � ccnV � aEi U, rA +' nca U o a o f DO b � X� c° v 0 3 a� '� U U ca a ' y c v �2 R ¢ o .� ° II ' 3 H 'o R s b " 0 0.'R 0It W 0 NGn CO :S E E 3 y a��i W = c Q o J °°' ° ro o c o 3 ti o titz- =p E cc = U N ca y b ca ca rn a W p by = > a U c o CW .> = o bo E U a 3 b ti a o o ° 9 ° 7 G cc = c=a 'O L p U a .E 'O O a A U .D 3 7 C � � � 0 3mb = O > R a � 3b > �? aEa r- 0 V3cto W -6r = w �+ ^O E o C = > U G a� U R v b E U ca 3 N -;G o E" U p p aoDi p ° aro o o y a a ^na E ' v v C > v E b > v - U ca a� :? ° a U a r o o E vx d ca M d ti .r Go 1 r y � t r.+ G r R y C u u W O r a c N Chinatown Project 4-3 Fina!EIR Addendum—September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES C R F r y h � y a c C .. c c C " � •mU ce a¢ c � .a °�' w a0, C o o ° � � ro � � bU w C z - oQ = � � � :>_ w � � SET � cc o - � > M � � b CQ .a � U y� 7 aa��i .S tiro .ro .. ,� •o ami aroi y m r aci ti o" " ° w b y > � °q U °Q G G •''- ai ° cc cani G ` do v c F" ami ° D o li d a ro c o b o c .E o '? : o n cmca-G CC) � � oww - 0 > X80 eco � D9OE u = D ° to.= ° > [U c U R o axi ^ 0 k �° 8 aN~i c o C E a ° O ro Ca c c = °' N U a0i ° a°i v �? °D v v.° d U U o U aUi o c ogro s ' .. -. = c ro aKi �, c .o °•� m -- a o q o o ° "-� o o v °' nJ C aci N � ❑ y F a A t` U 4 o O ro m 5 w N J�. Q ro G N 0 t U N .� O .0 �. ro U N U �O N .D ro to ° .� ° w 'm N n c ° on ti c a °Jd to g c v c > R � mgl..a .5 ° E R , ,E `o rd :° c ° � •o ❑ c . ro ° = ca °' s d U a d — 9 ro = ° c o � a w cc r- � d � � on U ro ' y w 3 M U ° 3 a as cc ° 6 •° :? y '3 D °cz � a ^� EA 3w E '� °':° cc„ ° v aN y � ° o ca Q 2dQ ? cq 3 D 9LA �°' v y ? :• ro o U O a ro ° O'.G O " x C o a G v v O O' o N .� u C m o L o z aU E s a CUc, c a G d o d m Q w Q o � � cUa � v� � v v � .� o � R s z � •a.fl o v $ � ' y ,n a d R � C C O u v ,rl � W " - �, a F 1° d C � N 44 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SummARY TABLES ' c L U � Y E G1 ea Eapocr,-, y U Q L 0 .0 Cdy ^�CL — .D 7 O w i t .U.. 'C C c r Cn M ti 0 U x CC .7 ECW C' E ® ° j ❑ -`° •= cd zy -' -0' .N. W to ' LY L u o m CC Q c° E `o M O aa) G o 3 a aCi a m c °' w 0.� Ca y U C D G > 00 y `°a .•4 y a R. E U U a) y U 3 O O 7 a) CL cc a C O 'D . Q ami •o U ?j `' O j G.w c° on Z E ° a° °' o s s a s .°c aai w o a.� y .� �• cc Cc c a ono a c a v°' ? ° H y ° ° to G aai c ❑ c c m ° o on m a .S ° U .2 ons a °�' >, • = 3 0 c M .S - L1 Ca ocE =o � oy .Sa,° cv; o'er .`6cs0v U•, 'C .co N m b c o c a a y Q a �s o a c` o t o �.S v e0 _ w S c v s ° _ m U c oca3i3 ° 3aro� 0 .5 a � bE _ � � .� yc . Caw U = E C* 3 b ° CC Wo a m ° g 2 5° ` o a ° N � c 3 ° a tl ° E a G o °� a -� on. . ca. v o 00 U > 3 > °�' c ° 0 t# '_ �'-' U C° •NI a WO " C ti w 00 7 c03 0 Utl �. y U cd cd U •2'. 'N y CO' W �..) (, i y U v a..+ Cr W ..+ p — = .U. 'O C. iU. y M E W N > > �. K = U Q W°"O.. �'O ° 3 n' E. ° •�. •,C ° �., r F. C CU." E—W -t3 C U ° N ° y N D o > v c °c M ' s a ° U . U abi v G o o a c C i b .v ti o ❑ o .� c c c v o V acia ° a a A �° a 4 .a y y m °'a ° o o 0. Q a o a"i ro = a) R v p - o c ° y CA v c J a W c Q c a o ° p^ o ,y u W5 i b >CJ ° °y a C.) o a C) C O a - Za a, ' C Cd CdU w � a b ° � •� .� E 6d Chinatown Project 4-5 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 I^ 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES - ° y a o D O m U M. 7 Cc U c3 v pq� O m - cC _ RS v EC v 0 U y o m '«r". 7 F 01 to ° y ms -� c � ~ a �+ S .E o 2 M "a c roo_ d ami z o Kaci ° " 3flU OA c ti U O a i C4 � rz yo c ^ _ ? '� oa ti o ro S c ou S a c .> ° �' 'S c S o eq- � 0) r. v .C. C :.d c vi C > �., C .+ > � ocoU � a �° m � $ Qs 5 c c o E ,o oU c C c � �o E 0 3 v � ._ o c COa � s b m Z .b 'O •C U m w. m �. C4 U N. a.d❑ > C f3+y O .�iC S O = O v A ° 7 •p N C O O =� v E U R .a cO C a N aNi O N G <`" 'b .� C y ' C ° v .15 C v h m •O L °..0 S yLy > v ° a's C� .vv C .0 0 y p 68b vi G y :: a ... C y O G v cC U C O O v' ,j .° :-' to a _ m rd . o " °' ° S S c " a� S .0 ° c c .° ro y r y a ro c ro S .o o .� S bto c � � � ct sOoy ox o°n ny g .2cm cv aeda. oc ov - SE .to W �C o3 d y a o .� c m o0 hl n ? nn > ° ° U o ` fy a 3 y b G c s o o c o • v °0 to - 3 = b ❑ c o ooU °' � � °�' :> � n3E � hor. u i° E v m y•o ° o c o ai o ° U cs a .� c cU °= n °'_o 'an.°-' y m y aci a, ° o [ c d a ? ° - Q L °o ° v .c a^ c°i c y R $ a ° U a b y 3 c C n N O �. F-' a v Y U v Oc yoO 'MayaO UH�O „ C O a a = 3 b ° ° °d .o o r � o Ea� + ._c . rcJ� n0 o&U "M O M CO , ° m: '¢ . 2 7.U E N ° s 3 - n. o°n °? m ° [_- ° 5 Fes- ° m R v, - y C r.l � y � d c -- u � 7 r F Q 1 4-6 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum—Sentember 2009 r 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 1 CL J 1 J s y J " E a � w 1 � a� c .5 c3 C 5 ro v a� W cw ° " '° 3 c -o v y U E , 3 o v g a .c c? � .n y ° y ti is C y O '- o a o ro N .0 CQ - �" awi E U . oq a°i ami a; UO •5 y 2 3 fl r5 cca E H n 5 ci J cc .0 •E5M o x cb " a aS = Ew $ 8c J ++ ao a 3 ro aro r. ro a A b N ? ti ro v c s ti O V Oa. O G C c a V y p ro y O U ti V N U rOii 7a ro o 0 0 w y0 -0 J +' ti � ° I F N 'C 3 y � ti '� : •U p � U 'fl UO .N' C U ° > Y ro 'S 'C Oa U '> CL ou'ia > 3 5 a c Ga .� E v dq c co F" a°i 3 a c ° .5 rr 5 ° ti O v� 'd E'"' o 'O u v a " Q O `o y `�. 5 w E zC 3 ro o v o o c ro N ro a x o ° a ° aU > > F '> °' 0 0 0 F U o sa w „ o o .V a ° d L > ^ "G° O V C L y O O C c y 0 .v r. .0 C D0 5 o F E > U c c ° .°A 3 cq Q W O 3 3 r F a F °' a 5lu ° C m ° o • s U '� w 3 ti y 3 ° °� y `3 w 5 a' N G ° G fNJ V E M p, M M vi M C a 'C 3 �. M N C .�+ '° .5 u1 •5 Cu 5 In. n ° 5 = .� a ro d0 V O C T w cC c5a o E U U o to= °? ° J � Zvi aV+ > 1 � � J a. u GM 7 1 QA p U J � J VI y R a F m Q N M ' Chinatown Project 4-7 J Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 1 i� 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES v E o c o° m W 050 E -o $ c `o o g '5 p .0,0 LC^ CO C E C > C C. ti LC w > > .0 C..0cc � C O U v m s a m 3 w f� U -0 V s .Z', a`i C 4. O ti m o p c n, a c r. ° � ° y a c 3 ° x°. E ° u s b ° s c cc E Le E 'u s 4 i Cc p o c E °L' E s s c � o � C U o Q) CI y OD o m c ° > .� ,c°v_ C. � o °_' 5 `o c ca to ca C s 3 cz V L .5 o f o5 y c a c c - ar 'a 5o � s.0 > 'Sa� G .SE � 0 C V] O is K :a W V 5 U CO 9 t •m = o v m Z `o o q ca >' a 3 y a>i c y c y 00.o y s o o > aEi c 3 r- 05 >, °D o Tc as 3 m c s o soy ° U 3 " >- o > r°c � E 's m c c os i s ^�_ � � o o o p y C OD r L U ca ,L OL J. C b c0 .� 'D u L .5 7 x > 3 o U d ° Z N y c o a.g o ?; o u O' o ° ` `fS]., rzi .ate OU m y '9 •N C L C Q, v .° m .5 n' V .^ CQ E 7 ' V v V O r- r �' V O '.� O 'C '6 .a 'fl N cJ �.+ R vy V v ?:- •� C `n C a: cc C rn C V CC [La i > 1 CO '3 ca c^'7 0 U L R '9 SQL/ N y.4. 5 v a u u u • C 2 o E o o • E Cc a� 0 5 u o ❑ a� o c s 3 5 u y ti u s 3 o Eaai L d c>a ° o s o R R O R N a. .N .> 1•� ^� C � a5 ° Eo :a41 > v m d U m �'' aci .5 `a 4 aai °� nn e 'C y " = Z ti > m o R c w g Y m o5 cc o E� v V in, C c c o E oa 5 UV Lam, .«vNVyQU 5 o b O O a _ C > r. iya CO > = = •° -0>1 , U > o a°N (— '; c .5 00 ^ s d ow 2 '-4 ^ a E ro E p p y p Q c u ca°i E ac, 5oc y s . � c E .� CFF.. L `. 7 b T U ' `n O C Z O F' 4. > O .. ti w C y _ C CJ C V 'C O O o .°. OD C C N F C ° 7 '> v L = c i s .� .� y c _c u aci v aci m NL. U o > y > ti y N V D C C V C U ca N O N t � �r��••" = G 'O � C%W 1�. � _ � � N ��++ s Vl O 7� � � s.p � L � � L L L r Q C • • • G eLa 'O ti U U •5 'O °V N O v y � 1 N cc Cz to U a 3 C C C O ca U V1 ::� u •o m s y - v w °u o o n 3 0 .: u a •RI L 7 L t C 0 0 CJ 7 H O ca ca . m Q U N •n _R a M U U C O 0 ' ^ 4-8 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 r 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES NO U C 0 U c ° E m 'c c y o 0 o a t c o " c a 3 x ❑ ai c J y cs U p U�- CO O N O c N U E W y c oq £ s U cc c 0 ° .N E G a .� Gai .0 •E 4. OO ' O U y •\ O O N C C-72 N O N t 'O N E - � G. f]. U _ cCi a o 3 r o � o °�' E E .E Cc cc -0 ° v c c GL o � c cEi s Q o 00 ? cc-11 ° c .° c 'E c O L Z y c9 C r N 'D rq d' M '9 C L .- Vl O 1 n a N o ° ° '0 pa •• OO 3 r° as E 's 0 Z J c c y 3 '- E o Q 5 -,I- i°� 0 w aci y E o > " o z p = ° tis o CL o U -5 00 0 E J a� v . v c ° > S V) _ " ° ` Q c=i E -0 .c .H ccs 0 3 U 0 O U O CQ " an c0 �- 0 i �y U C C U S b L 2 p c o ° v o o a M C U .43 c o ` c a _ o C in C � Us c .. o . .. cd .C .°C O c� ° iU, 3 cCtl m U O x i C' =zed p ° ee b o s U U n C _a.� y N ° .E5 .E D n o ' F o n 3 '� m 000 t ° axi s o` c a a N ° 0 4 h .r v co > cc ' ° 3N U Q a o E M ti .o '3 c •� oD.E .= am m n ` U N . v 'C o 00xCnWs " Z s b a o U � c O bUc .coaci � � E cc ° cE � �° aw E '0 c > 00 o R U o o C o `o E v s 3 c ami a a y ° a api g d '°�-� oc atli N J r p °: •� ° c ." t N x M 'a _ w N 'fl o �- U ani ' � - a R � E > o = r- .U" tSv �° ° 00 U (YA� � s d .� G E o > c c0 L N T L 7 A a C 40 = o N �, cCa o ca U O N L N ^Q an N U OD f3 U R U r i U Cd aJ i 'y ow c E c > s c U 2 °�' 5 T to � a E • 'OD � r- 0 N b •� O U 'a H .� C G w C R �. O ... N •y 0 b Jl .7 y II. N N ' �, w N Cn 00 L a� T O U m. a� 3 R >..� C p ami a aci 'm o € 2 as 0 b 3 = -a -0 a` ° ° U cc 0 C/) a E a s � € roEcN oc � � � � U � R � 'cc g � � � a= yccsc N U .. a) O U W p 00 C r� U N �d O W C '�.. W �. � .E 0000 In y CO t C� C U p .� Cd 7� ° .Ni O Cn g U c Cc Uo J ee C ° E aai � a U � U Z � c o 0 0 `o aS aO E s a'r'cs c Ocs o � 3 CJ Ut U o U Uoo � a 0 '8 U U o us m > N y U m U U o E ° F c o cs W U W w U 1 O V Q cCa Q n m C eCv q Oho . � R _ 0 Cd Jr r., 'O Q. 0 N J E C .-E U U _ y O U p C O O rn C .O. 'p m cs � •r, VOl d � - � FC M U Chinatown Project 4-9 ' Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 1 J . 0 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES N �- .� Q U c L * C OD O CS U 3 O T O a •E U F 0 �, •cs E � G L >V ++ E ro L d 0 0 3 U ^a r C O Q 3 V V L OD ro E 75 ° v > c ° >;y roc ErU 0 oo .4 co0 3 c E E = � � � oroc mUcpE � ro 'N > - v3cs ° o � ° s �' ... y t. C Co 0 0 0 C 0 > Y ^ L U .Y.. Y C E s o ami o ° 'N c LZ ti ro U ❑ o o , 4? U m 0 � * 5 ti > $ Z U c v fl = o Y 0 3 0 °° c c c c E .E E ° o 0 ai o ° .5 = ❑ o _ o ° ° o ° ° ° �e d 3 a p ❑ ° E r x > 4 a>i o f �. aa� ro _ Ecc U V y V to > .Y pt O G rFro. td Q; ro m 0 O N V 6 {°y QJ G00 U r1 .�..r CO r .'.' y l••/ C U '._+ 'c -4n R c w e 3 0 0 0 0 c v c y N �_ ° E �e �' aroi N o y g d cc c S c C Y •v'+ G. : : u4. �- E - .- .00 c0.fl •� d -0 ro U ro c ° ° n b b c ° v ro o o c °W ca :3 w E 00 s c U ° ti 3 > ° 3 L ^� Cn on Y V c Y 5 c _ Y ti a p c N° oo � � ro ° rY � .� coa ° � � ^ p3 v � O _ 'a o � ° O 'fl ro .L7 cc Q 3 rA '' O V V] qR .D G y p y E c0 y E Y G v m .L O p 0 U O O f� C V ro ro V .'. .O O r- rob sdv _ c cc 'O a oho � s Y 4 U aUi C2ou dons 3 s - ° c . c ° > o0ro 43 ° E .� i� Q ° F- y a ° a s H y 3 = a c ° s Z =° o °Y' ro o CO C E c ° y s o 3 c ai c o y b Cr° m oU E Ce Sc v D d ° Cd U v u = 06 c>i Fro aci U c U U c = N U o U T o .N n S 3' E u v =° c a p v c ro a, a. n h 5, u � as 3 0 9 v 3 T o oc3 .B u .. ; U 3 0 W2 o - QJ Y UV] a0o U O = a CO Gz7 i a y a 00 u o F u0 � •= F o U n o0 0 •� •� rn Q, N N c U .= zQ V 4-10 Chinatown Project Fina[EIR Addendum-September 2009 i 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES J v / .O O X r- d0•� U , 11 E , E E Ca E t :a O O ti O C •D y .C UCn _+ 7 0 C 'C c`1 ca 22 C •C oq C. U cd U 1 E o vL' E E :- u _ c E °' n c OO VJ E VJ J U ECRU OA 9 C •p O. O N p C d j .N E' ?, y LLJ p 7 b O v O v cc u 3 � c 3 E � c ° = sos E , •n c c c v � Ln c c °y' E Y o n E °� E -`c' u c U aUi E c oU rz E E '¢ ti .E o `o �- s N :x E Z = s � ? 3 0 ° ° = o c 3 ° E d c '� 3 c v U a a c c E W E W a o Z v q v .E - ° 3 a>i ° = 3 E a '�' °_ E " $ TaQ E s n aN ° c vN t:Jr U C U �+ CQ E v.d 'C cC Nv 75 p CZ E 3 .E °E lou s � � ` t � s � o E � � o r� � .. c C NU co U s a v m p o 3 " o b v s c _ OU U r— Cc CU N � ° C) 7 N U •O C aCi a`i = ? •— OCc .UO j, 'D 7 a� 'D C 3 V D\ , d v v s v c b COCa v v c ti o c o c v c W U a 7 N U = v s 10 o cc d °c° :? c - o ° ;� 0 6 yEcc 0 = N -0 c a°ioE v U a 0 .3 °c E € a v to � Uv � � ` c m R E U •G � o � m a O U C• o h o W U v E o - v N a Q ._ c v �+ m o v c s EcE 3 aavc xc °A > 7 ; '" ° r� a� oy - cc y 2Qc / iRF- .o ? to v ° O =° W 4 3 ,>> D v E s. m .y •G y c a ° 00 QJ E m. 2 c R a m U c 3Q ' c o n N R` O v a o o y > O c m / c v ~ y o ° u M o p E 3 s c ami E a>i E v z = v z y v c z ti 0 c R R C •'O U Q U U c U 'O y o C j '9 ti ." 'O C ._ U CO)V] V] z O Q o oU v Go R > ccC 1Wcc E Uric L o00002 1 O pUp to U U ti W i � Y E 3 ee U Z o v E en e4 2 3 c s V V Chinatown Project 4-11 1 Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 / 1 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES as CL s - F � h H u .. a m - ..w L ° F C = H N c .� c c `o B 'L' y cc v o c cn o y o q G U y N Ua=i p;p y 4 .a 'G y Z �- s 3 o > c o > c > o ° c = O F Ecc w = ` ° " C y '- 3 o c i = y Z o U y flR Ov a d a°i m o a m s vZ cccc > Loo U cc CC t>. c0ccv 6J C O •R T C E N o o o ,�, o y m °_° 6 y c UE m c c a y p c ° o n O o ° m '� E ca c zy c O b N z � • _ o o a o y _ 1 � y W.1 - rl CQ _ C o C _ WI Y .O z 4-12 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 r J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES C t N N N o v 3 c c o r _ r VA F _ 3 u Es c > 3 CL r _Er ` to _5 t# •• = m a c c c tE u c c a c �m C .0 O 'p 'C •y :a C .0 •y to.c ed eta 3 c_ Cz oq ,� c s _ F = d > s s r y ° _ c U c o. o .5 v w v o °o c Q => s C O N O O O G a) N d 'O 7 y v N O O 4y C N '•J• .� O L .n O, y N ca > > ` a° y m ° .O O sl C 7 a ar :E a a E > 3 t o a N y v 3 v Ca E c 4° c K .a •> s . r _ °° ` r E cS R V N Cd '� Vtz 3 t O O :: .D u a) U 'cs = 0 y O d y � N in •� <..: V �. R > •E cOa a) N NC4 .D O 'N '� O y Es E Y °qa >, > n o r o v a0 E .°;c o ' 'c >,a' a U a 0 a U L o y N N r u U'E �° 0 m s E a 1j _' a °' v-' k m w `o 3 v E s a`i ^ a X > ro c d m o ° a) c E m E > .� o N s s > s a "� c.c r C bn N .O O y .E O O N aci is V 3 y R O G M y E ca M rC e n Ns c 3 'y .E U U c c o Eb ao � s ° E " r 31=2 Q N G N c c� U W s R m v c s • s L _ U .N soo E �j v o ou3 c ,.... yt N r � U r u E as 'o 'o rO O •N O.> 0 O O dU VI .F U R .�. V — r n m o c 2 = = co.o0 7 OU ,O O C E N r. •p CL O r ° � ° r _ 3 u to i V TE r � � cz 9 Q y N R r 'n .> c. a 3 > a.'> to r r Chinatown Project 4-13 Fina!E!R Addendum-September 1009 r 1 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES u 0 c > . C 3 3 '3 ♦+ N � � G _ Q a u .a o "m - N o N 4. E — E C ? 2 .0 E •E - C N b •z CQ c c i _ c a`' h c m F o y ro d 0 0 o N 9 ° c c c ro s E v c ^ > c WWI, E E 6 0 o U N c ro ° M N 'C y ro a°i _S E `° yL Cn _ y c v � 'N �A � .: � U � m °� rob �'••' _ co3c `m 0. '�+Cfld�„o acpp3s�° _ _ .°° d_•°�oa' e c c >3 r, a) a m .ocO 0 5 �g ° 0o C4° UG 1bQti G N 3a UU _O w° Vo cc c C Ecc V •o ° 0 vc co Z c m ro __- ^_• o ^ s $ R o o a c o c W m 3 o c ro u c Oa o 0o cc Q 5 fl 3 ° N _ E Q m W °° Cn ro 5 E v 5 c v Cn E Q ars E 3 E R 3 .5 O .% C LO �: G •y y .� O d V 7 C a t T y j O . u cOa 7 >L' O d U m O U mp c 0 > O -. o ^aro c a 9 Cn o cco c m 'o c U V '� ° c��a z aUi s n'� •°—Nn 0 p m Cron •� w `%' aUi .a d d a. o cCa � U � c'c Cn € N oro 0 D ” ro c c o [� cc ° E = > s ° � � � .Sc Uo $ � d= c �° br. a.vca 'Cz - 0c° � � fl �.5 � "oma — � .= ° ° ° c .5 � 3ro � ° c .� oaai > u m 393 CW > .o N a, > s 3 ro D c W E ro c > d ra b E ° N O O c- O N 0 a) `� �- U d ~ ro C ro w .b a N oA s a) ca ro ro b 7 w Cu ro y ° r N C C 3 d s .E 0=A W .On ani > cro N .c s - ° ° ro Q .. a co c E 3 0 o .o @ = e N N E $ $ E ? m 3 cu u N �^ S O = a nU .c a °' N ro o € 3 ° ° •c o m '� 9 °�° o° > 9 c °' o E v 6 ° >O U O D U O >O 7 N U C V Vl U v`Ui E G= cUa C 0 C E C U N Q y U ro U 0 d m U o Q m U NcNa R 'C . . . . . . F" 'C G cCa '00 4� E cc: C' 'y CC V] c y N C > N G ti u ami c..a to ai z ti ro ai CQ C > = �. U Cts T> �_ ccO. O O O 3 u ° E3 U x N o • m s E a) ° Na am3 o s U U ods b rl .0 N vi U O U 4... cOa _ ro O R ° c `y .0 •_., M . (� ° c u ro a o E o N O Od O ca U y ca .R d'fl v C iA O E U L L r- a O O 2 'C1 L U � V L F, as d tv y y U _ N O o c o° rn a Ccq S w p y £ ri Q aw en U 'm °: Q o 4-14 Chinatown Project Final E/R Addendum-September 2009 - r 1 J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 1 1 J .. 7 1 ° u � y / a 1 E u r at Y Y z ° co c c aci 0 ° 3s v � c o ° = .�r � � c c c � v Uc°. a r 3 o a m G N 3 D c 5 3 a O r O U LO > b y E ° ° v ° ,- gctO = g ° � — ca c a b wo � L cccm .4 � w t-. ACd rNi d 3 >,•� O .° " O°. q :? ti 'y v .>' C " C .co.O y Cz U O a0, '�s 0. y R id p itl U co � nnm � � E u v c o -6 o 'm � 3 ❑ ° n ° > ami abi " s °= ai n 1, FL- u a s y ° o U u y b o . . _ E E v c " o v o ° o o �' onN � � �.'a '� °c' ° ai C O .� ey E '9 � c C ° p 'p C N E in N to ° cN 9:6 a caw- Ec > � Ec J yc p • > 5c _ owSa � ° � >1 >1 � � ° d � � c v v = c u ro v .r , . • Cr U u cCSOc c Z- y q _ c.n:qc c 9m r O > .0 t . O •� , O c� � -0 •O y b � c3 N v u y m O N 3 � p 0 0 � o c o c a n x o ' cb E c ° ° � `o 'y o c 1' E n tea '' .? � .= C)LO- m 9 G to c c „ E. . _ c c E c ° c c o a � CZ E eCe L C C E c0 • eo -- ^• •• h u J .r - r y O y fJ r � U d u � L O L •moi a�+ m U E en e+i Chinatown Project 4-15 Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES U i U 7 _ R C 3 p d � v w E c E .� C '_ U = c o o 3 0 c_ _ - F p R 4 v d d t _ y oCC Uai o° c a=i .° s Z 3 d ° o o R o ' cc o c t •y .b °= 4? c w .S O.o, c = .x c F C E G 00 E �_-' y '7 O y R U = -0 N y V c=a O U S .� '0 R V 3 q _. to pO N 7O . E . _N _O 'GproO 'wa co C w wtNoC. •CdO LU• Ov •� I. _ - •>1 .> OU R s b iC V] '� tD'C W w0 •d R C y U cc L O O C = y > = U t o Z a o pp 0 W .=' o y ° a' �_ �° O g a 'c Oq U U o U N c .ti n� o c m ° _ ro '� m ° o ° c a > c .o o f V U E o = U o a- y v �j ° R o 3 R = CCto r O O. R ~' O w 27.t m R y R C :� Z 7 O U U c b O ,9 0 F U U U .- G. V w d b R _ cc .= h y O F O y U UO .E V N = U y N .N c3 U cd L N d c U O ,_, ... cUC a) 1:6 a'm R c0 O w R _ �. N z o a u D c L c > o = U R C y y b 6 s .? 3 o G E „ p m 3 y ' R b ° `° R m p y ccs E .o y F" m e ta=i c U 7 °' c c > — V � 3OTO R cO" O O U > � U ? - > U 62 10 cc 0 16� vE adz Cc E Oa=i - c � m r. +y+ U a 'C O O - � N R L O. v z o _ 3 p s R _ y U U U O R 7 y o R to v q ee H E c U y —� w aE ^ U � c'O-' ri a p a a� N Y W m U .N tnZ o 0 F C 0D �; °O 4-16 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES y 7 'o v o ami = 3 0 3 y >1r- 00 +cw 00 c A cYa U m 1] � y C C H rOi> > i i R O 7 ca > m y �. .v O U O U O v cya O y '� .� y ,D 'L7tz V d y •� U bAL y N •y �U. tuG r O CO cOa s ., y i"' cOa N V m U O m .Oj y rGj y 0 0. N E V O ,Q y y L o Q y y y X DAN p � yto ' U U U O t t p .h U •y0 O O.O U '� y N rz E o o ' a ° = G c. -y Dq � = .° a•o c n,c � 'fl G F! 3 ° caw O y CCU y p Op 3 v cEaoS° ° En V 3 -0 t v .C `'� •� w .UU.. v1 0 •� m .to _ U ° °' a cyi c s o s c 3 y2:, ° a 0 to g 3 5 u j 'c_ 0 o E" cU .tp•2 a -a � E � M o D a � 0 0 0 � y ' E D ,c oA v U y c O c 3 0 5 y v +- L c o Doc o s m c o s y s 'y °� °-' 'o — a) r0° _ � a � o .- to any C3 m 5 ° H = 0 E o ° c fu ^ N 4: C* .5 ✓� �+ DA y U O ,Do Don G m e .° v c c A 'v v cUa CQ C� '- 4, ra '� O L C U y y aS G O v .D U t � •-- � .� • 'cs o = v s = v s p to y m U v w y O L C ro C .0+ y E , L m V C s O O ' 4) G m O Y y 0 �'- G C ❑ �' C bA DUA C y' U a ca .0 •° m N U .to aWi a ° y 0 to x d G no= °' 'm .50 � °0 " D°ncaa°i 'E •'; doT'Z: 'v -v7 °° Cn ° ° O 0U 03 R G U rX •� E — 'O^ 3 v GG y z aGi GA ro °oA CJ 'U+ v m U E c c Do c U s 'o V _ D m E �= = y 0 t m c c_ S� 5 U a-0 o. 5 m > U aai a ° . Cs Z 3 y o E Q m V� c wrzU ca v y o u c o c ® a� tiCO 4 y O 'O U y DO a m i.y C U O d v y O v '� �'.5 y O N .mac"+ '�- •--1 U '�., m c;; N c U y = t d a o 'Oc0 E G'o c`a m•.°'^. i a G' cYa O U u cm ._ c as o n osy Ecc U w �OU �^ Ci b. U m .D s 00 Q, G U O .O O G U y 'O .y G W Co ° E � aa�ci s5o22 s o y 9 a) 3 F C DAO F� q ti F" 4, U COui o v ° v c c a°, 'o eri DOA• Q>i .DOD mom^ G 7 W y Vim '-y e-i U 'W O 'O ti U '-y Chinatown Project 4-17 ® Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 i 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES CIO o ° @ o ° n U_ O = 3 v = y = E E Vi W •D E 7 V y C =. C O '.y 7 C +y+ C _'7` c G ncc v V > L V O r !3 LOW G N pCq 1 - _ toeg > ^ � w CO 'o oCa 5 m v5 . � a CIOroc .0 •@ ° .0"3@ ° .F,pepe _ °•vv •° -_ '@ °a0 = aN W3 =° `o mmRrc > ai i @c EQ .- s C.F- . a v CIO -0 am ° to Q oo L•=°3 _Wc c E° co °no ° to o m °V to to o > O a) oL w o = OD U fl ° C ._ @ @ v E > C v C C • O ° O O@ U O tip y m y N ' ti .. ._ p.L .� J7 is .. U _ '+. C x Cs O b_O zu- > L C E G @ L. L t O L h U C N C L. @ c O C@ E r •� C R °� " v = w x 0.S ti E x v ° v O °�' @ � `-' _ C y - ° aa)i " 6 on o -0 ° x ° CL ° 50 to E a ° � t c W _c 3U `o ° o ° N v cc 5 ° = :? .� y°.= ai ° (j V U c F V y p v y C O D O V y'._@�. Ct =0 'CL 0Omi CA E s A CU p y n L O@ .� c� U i. N G 4 7 .. N U •N W �, 00 a. N v ` p N "" @ �p 03 'O C a m 'C O ° O O. V O co E Q @ b y @ W @ ° 'd @ O oQ '3 (5 c ' of - U V 0 � @ '—� N N '7N C >> M cC 'C •--� G Q U W '9 �. N y y C �. @ ° N o r &73 O > c ai N >, o. N K v y y L'7 . t .-� Q a is o 'v E `ti - CJ G 3 C7 tom. n m `o '> n o C) c• -0 o o ° o O ° s v x v c a m g a o ° - 0 ,0 c x o 5� c o ° @@ 3 W rs a u c x ti 2 0 4° v� v in ti C R d O 6. a d E y s C '� rVi, .y L@ ie vi `_. d ti oy LE o > .� ? axi. a; as ac3c � ns r ° 3 O O cc C O O u 0, K 7 4 •= CLO N .. =Q y E C O ° 40. N L u. E V O q t @ p ti O0 y -t3, . O N 00 ° a) c v og c6 •y ' . ° O o a= 0 700 > -0 -0 cc O cd -0 u bo V 3 C U@ ' OU @ = y � 'a yy 3 a O , OO pv UN@ M U ` C U t=V. W i '�..-� acd. U •� .F o > > °' x N .0 o .o @ 'v U 4-18 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 a 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES J ti ti Ego C o C wOo L) .". E .EE y V m ^ U on d E c N ° ' C 3 on C 0 3 0 0 � a ti Z o r n' tiw c,NV„ v 7 .v —OWM p = ti -� •c° 5 O M y o o cc .B °° Q d m `oNC', N U G .D y Y O C .4O ; �G '� ° - O axi ° Q a'fl d ' "� _ _ _ y •� a ° y y s .y O Cc ou o _ K s CO m ' - � O„ a, Zau r s o w O t o v ° c v J ° s o=_u '0 'c ,> 3cs F a 3 F E m 3 ti y 9 A a on 0 C U A 3 ca .... U O O O E .� G 3 ." i O y O v — U .� z oq _ _ UN C _ .� .0 in U �. U �..y. R U m a ._ o m — ° o c ° ° .- c ° c c m r o ° y '- J o ° O ° ° p ^y 7 p v R CL 0 U �. U C a V V X a U ' U = U L p C N a O d CO .C-� O .0 CO .O. ° 4 U' C y O O. ° h �c N m ° fl a 9 n c ti c N � a c cc ° ra ° C a c �' o - ° to 3 r G .�, ti 3 — ca 0 3 .° cd -UC d y y m ° U .� w G G. 0 3 a • v L o cv c a cN c U -14 O o c y m y `o N °' " p 0 ti N ° E ° � c p m r. wc Noy o o �°' m E o c o ani x o o x o o a a > o a p c a ❑ O ° c ° N a c i a aci Car-F a c a m °� X a C, pp o 3 m h � � � C7 tt, b b � m .n a m � � d O � m m � '�, v ce � y t W CC O X fl N c > O z R ' y y O U ca cOa y V J U o .R0 7 3 N O N o to a ° c vj L3 O X a cS V E 1 w 9 O = 3 J Ne Oro °ion to C C W .moi �+ i U 'y F � v Q a o a l � OnaU J Chinatown Project 4-19 1 Final E[R Addendum-September 2009 1 L 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES U y y y y C L U p I - u E M o Ewa ° oy . � ciayo $ 2 y R 'v CO .y C E ej U b0 c°7 ..U. .C R ' U U .o�,c •E a u EE E E ° E R E ._ y G . E cc G yR o s R o o f — a a p ° y N ° d C° 3 0 c y R' � U i e aaRiv> '_c o E =s =s oz � os c b c c = o a U nF- � ai = 17% — N R y R - C Cr co OL gS a 0 N Gq a' O N E 3 °? C E. cc E N y U cc 0 G'•'� t N p 'U aTi G O t > p C �• N w L r- o os o ° � c y 'ouy y >1m cc -a, E d co.E u= s o^ c=cw ° C > R O fl U N R O° _ _ b �C X71 . 3 N = y U y V - D aRi G N > y R .� 04� oa v o ? o ta EosUomycY � U y C 0. 00 •O p >, E cUd N s U -� U — = W R o y y o f s 3 ou n y o Q .G ° m `-' a > ca c E v E o w R c =_ ° m ti c L c = E U - E �. E i3 •p OU ,� = E R 'D-y b O G ° R c o E s M = °= — .c a b ccs cUi c. n cUi Rc L N E U C _ U y T a` E N s E V •E U z i y v y _ II. O _ X > to = c o n= E y o y R 2 > U c E 'O -CL U Lr ='— U 7 '^ rA �. C U V N 3 U y m S •D r- s 'E s x 3 ¢r- cc rz ,c ° c s y R o 0 y c y ' 3 0 Y ° o o _ — m 4y+ d 7 cE = v •E O L 3 O W i., R N •� y p Q 3 U ti > U O Q O ;� L n' Cpy� 4 C V E_ U p C� ie O V L ° . EIT _ s U E m .G C o N y U y E s E .E e y c N = co N 'C N A d s ou o ou= c .? t'C Q > d ° o aDi >" R E R T m p y u ° x y c 3 E y U 4 2 o S o x s •a v x • CO o i = s N X R U 9 W E y d U U V� C C C p C O CJ �y+ H R O G d u E 3 cU Cc v c p > R .. o ° �c °' ° o m 3 co O _ r L ° s 0 ° oco VG.oq. s m o E o ° N O X U R s° °N � o s q to `3 N 7 Ca o .� C ,-C3 :a ,n o oQ c m o >- c° a — epi :'. =e C� aU x Ua aXi n s E e i x y y . R °_. C 4-20 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009. r` i 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES J J ' u J p _ C u G05 1 C> w CO J 1 e u 1 � m ;ao GM Z ° Cn '' E y .O c0 V N .C C E' O cd .C N Or- J O a`i O E aEi c .: o o ° c ti Nv a3i ° 3 v ° c°i ° 3 ai = a? ou E ?3 " ° ° " °' R a� > c o c E v vG E 3 G,J Lt1 c0 C.U .00 °N' °' E `° •'�� ' ^' �.° 7 is Q y m J Eco E c ° m u m s a 3 o n o "m y oRu v c E > b y 3 c ac, = c E > c N o w a� n � 1 �_ o m = ` > E o c`b � To o N td '' ro T C N is O O •0 . G y W y 00 C cd O sN 3 v y m c v c N E o N a o v a c .E N ti c ° c „ Cq c c m ❑ ' ami c m ° =° c o L 3 m o c t° ° c0 c a a3 0 °3 °' n • 4- c a c 3 N o h o c a� o c R a. ro E 2 E ou oo ° �s ° r, ° 0 c N c Ec � s ro �° U ro f ° y y ° `e E o ai bc ❑ on N N o o o '- c a5� a N R •y pC NO L G� c�i 1. VJ E2 C. C -D ° J E Cr F N dD= y o= 7E 0 R p N II _ C O w O C O O to N Y Vi G O N ` n N .Q❑ .' V = Q ce O d y N (_' �' cd N O ,3 � 'C�. 'C^ �= y ed N C N cs E a ro o o .� N �. '_ o o a ° to aci 0 v N ° c R C o Ca 3 'E a C °Da ro ° E ° $ o ` o ° 5b o � � .. N c m c x w n cz d o d v v F C7 .q Q c°a m n E / .. c N N h •Y.1 u ca a >, 8 = J d y d o+ U 3 ' 9 G Jl i V7 0�0 L CA E `O — en �. Chinatown Project 4-21 Final EIR Addendum—September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES U L 7 y o a 3 .L7 c w 3 0 c2 R G �, E — a E .m O ^p - _ [ > V - b .E .' ❑ � d 7 a � R � 'b v O y U C .� O U ° .p ro a a s > E Y fl. E U = O U op p O .+ roU C E y o c c 7 E to E ° ° o L m `W 3 ° W � a FZ °L' o c oo oo c° U E - a) to cca o ° sR ° G F o � > — c cy = c°' � .c 3 ass 7 my E E 5 o ed 2 'Dbo 7 UZ 4 l O •� cC U y ro ro 7 (� U R y c3 U U a.E c` E o ay8i to 7 =0 -0 E mtz = y m a m e F o m aai ° v >o ° ac ° °r. x > e c c °' 9 °� - c X o fl Ua CO N � a ° � cc �+ o aEi o •c ' c .S a o E ayi - a�n 3 9 R r.: a G .-. "-' to y ro y O ro y N cd N W R E' T• pL - - 0�0 o 3 '� a E a.° `o c a m woo'—Lc^ E o y c 8 a E y ° O ° a. „ ca c _ too .E o oow ° R v o l ca C1. >� cci R 'a o a = c ° o E G U y o°o y U ° ° '� ca `v m U E E aai ti w c y '� `•- U a� U y 'C O 7 00: L L C C '9 y N .. �, R O > y U ro v .E F .E 7 O '-' O O n V Ca O fl 7? o v m00 ° '; C to L y '� 'D L O C V O R cd cL6 •E w C 7 C 'O Oa C ro , z > e ° c v� � ^ z m a a ° n �' y �^ aai a°i a > E D oo E o R a.a t m g ro °' E ° ro 7 L .S y L e o o c . .- o ° = ° 3 [ � • sscy c ° 9 R L Cd c"i 0 noo U A D c ° 7 ° E o o a° v ° m E ° R = ° 5 . c C L t w L y y c ° V i°�., y o 3 E y of$ U p y ° y - F E ° ai >, a °L' L a o a�pp o a•a .a'o �_. 3 c a y u L a '- c d 0 s H 7 E a. Q' C 7 s .� E ` O •fl �..' w ro ° O G oL0 ro o0�? a V O - 7 U 0 2 t F. m :: c E f) U `" a o cCc is «= _y m F., v,"W `o := CQ 7 O U o0 .p ro U C O _ y R U C. ° pp'° c.. `' E c bD G ro ca - C. a a W 5 : E E 7 E " y a i °' °' .a a°'i c ro ° .E .= a.=° 3 U m > � N 3 U N a y ° n �! c € M E r. 7 e Evn 3 °' v D '� v .S � � R a� E � � ° � c o ou 0 0 N v O. ° OL R q y y y .n' Q •U 7 ° G t?.�_ ° v ° O cd A ,5 `.' y N 04 ° d .r. > a n.'v Z 3 o S x > ° Toy y U ro oo y S. o a U g 3 - Ci :_. • • • • �' y cyC C = '� ?4 S ° T O cLa .p y C m U y O C cU0 r. Y i 7 co. 7 C U U t a E d a 7 v tto 0 3 O y F O •E y C 2 a� 'm ? E y CA v ai v ° ayi y c - II. > O E fl ro a= N _ r m 3 0 as r 3 0A w U O r � 7 p (y/1 CO U 3 cE' arc ° _ o _ o c a O c a R 7 O ro 0 C4, U a U U .D a .>_'. U � p Z T w R t.- 3 cc aL CDR _ 4-22 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES G J ° 4 1 O T U U c O' w Jl a cJ � oLco 1 O J 9 p O J t•. E N ro O ro CQ O C 3 q Cr O o O to r- V N c to t y 3 C E E ` c a a`i a m s >> °�° �s E 3 O 0 ro o ° 3 ' N ro U a, aoi .= a°i D b �, 0 o y ° d Cd a) ° ° N ro Cr ° N ao > E.I O to •a C=0 .�_ to 7 > PC U .�. 3 10 n ra m s 3 ° a y n i °S 7300 °�' ° 5 � � a� � roro oa � o � va� � ❑ ro � - mU m c_ ro U o — o °= 8 � 'i 3 c a� ns °p ai 'c Jc .= ti - ro 5°s ^ c aci s ° � '� Da � N � c op a 0 y N y ,$," > U '3 y � ° C y y ro �Cy = .0 to Iron 'fl .ro+ COro Z v > G N N vVV G U N. O D U U E N O N b N O c 3 o a' E o R ` ' = m cc no•- U °o o yd b > cco a s R> 30 CE •p U C cue 4 C �. :; 'O �" O .� n' O > U ' r1 ti y O .� ioQJ enCc " C q Lv Uccy o c a COv: b w ° o N O o ° ° ° o cc °' to to U z E n. . ° o .= c ro U ro rn .� c c o ?? N n ro C m to CO .� ro o ? ai en i `a "� °^7 n a a� t °= ao o 000 > _ c ? Ca w w ° _a T °o q m ° 5 3 c y c ° 0 c � p ao y � o z °o � tl � a �" °o o c o o � ° N ° " '� o c o x — c Z � d � O a� o Zc � s ° x o c Ca a-o 0 E U n .O ° v > °° ro . E ° o ro G -. V ro o LT. C/� C ' N w cCd N N .r J U 3 aEo � Jtrill o>n a aco ,�_, o v � 9 F' T•� = � IUL ro N Chinatown Project 4-23 Fina(E!R Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES c , U = V tE c0Es � 3 '- •° aai o C o _ tC N u a on C3 o E E c E m O o c E c = O - eq cc 4: o E "' c' .2p E � °' � " W a O c c °' a c C � V� � 3 = s ea a•E 3 '� 0 - >, n v o o c = a w -°v o a o oU E E > COo o° to r .o > a 10 c = w ' o> co -°E 0EotiEc°c EUy E °� v b> y C c _ 0 c 3 0 .2 8 2 Uo .° o°'nc .; ° ti ° W U V to «'. C 'N C -' E U r - D3 5 > fl c y ° ° gip = � s �, > R - U „0... 5 v R 0 -0r E 4` > - 3 R z ,E, E _ o a� 0 6. , 'vmCO O U ' E U 0 Y m =Gon ° R ° .o O(n O " E C U L p s 16 01.= yE tuy° °' omo -om ° - p c 3 3a y 0 o C E ti ti y o o c n " v c ° ° c P: o .rte-' � � m U oo m k s � E � 2 it z .nl >1 1 CO c ti ca c c -0 [ i d o U E 0 — ! C U E 0 _ ... c a � � �' a � 3 •a V 4 'o d U N OL y C p cya ' y 3 °" U op > ° � s 2 E. o v 'y 3 Z ni v ° p > o 0o O O a Cl "i z °a'> 4-24 Chinatown Project Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 C 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES eD w c p o � c o 'o � .. � •a c Zy ti sir N C C C C c6 E n 3 ° ° _o -j O OD m Y U U CO — ' E .9 E ao b 3 = c �o� c c O) V C ctl y 0 7 .. o c° E 3 0 N N r, Q G. T zfl i c_"y EO ca N "B Cd O C N 3 to 7 .. 0 J OD y s C U ' C C U C N ° cc to E N to r7cc V w Vi Cr C c ° = U rz c a w y c � � m ° 3 '� T R = C C 0 r. pC O X y, •N U to E ° N ° cc F U ao° o❑ o pa0 o o CE 0 0 V - g5EN ° y O cc �py❑ s s v v > ° o N as °os _ oc •NF- c ° � omU v � a- 3 � co � m °> c > 0 '0 d � N N ° = 0. o E 5" - ° �� ^ o ro N ao 3 o h aai °a o 0 a C ° E c G• _ s N v a E V ti .Cp.. U C 3 C is O 'E 'a— 'b T C ctl eq cC •O '� '� O w N Q o _ a 3 00 0 s o axi m ° > 3 .E s o -'� ao o a ' D c y oc � Ev o .> t3 � c � � cO N � cm ° E _ G N U O E a N c R E ° s y ., N >, ° °7° .5 t7Lv -0 aEi `o _ R CL. ,o E ci o c .° Cs r- E eq F c a aai c E res '°= E s U oL=o s c� a s N o _ o w Q � a F ° e°'o c a E ° 'c ca i 3 ° c $ y >,.E c p — U o c E Oa b+ O N a ° to cc 7a " O w N O N p 0 co ._� O �^ 3 w �'b .E •y N ° — a is a ; E w U iN„ a U ° 'D a•- vi y O cc C .� v tat CJm u E F cis ' ° .G s a Cr eco E y °a v N m •- c _ p ` ° a > s s Cc O N ti o v E E R av c N � a . U ' n 4 E Q U o J � �o ❑ � o to— m O p G U c ❑ 3 0 0 ° O O N tV p i tj a p es cCo � E c C W cc y0 L a N O > N C3 E N :21 > Chinatown Project 4-25 1 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES m U V ` R p a•b .. = ti v o CL ro .ui q is = G •� .._ o ❑ •o ro .� ca •� ca O � ul m d cc a c ° ❑ o R T C O - to U U O Crz v c Oc m c .� p aro) .d o — o F o m o v °o . ro 0 s ai o a ££ 5 aci ° ° ° ° . ° C > o c 5 0. H ° ° °3 Q .a ro ° o a3i � '^ gip q � °' o � � �0 ° c c ° � c o o a �a a) on - p ro y 3 b v �4a? E a b •= •� m c E E a>'i a) i ~ a ani J 60 $ o m y >o ° Q c c Y ° > mv0 � . � myoonro � E ° n00cE � v u a E a ° c '> .5 =? c .� y ° > o y E a E o on CO .__ � a " 0 0 � a a o on a 0 — n a c c b 0 Ca v y a._ c _ 5 E cca y o E u 3 s °�) ? W `°E OJ b ° c v a3i ' m a 're a=i `o ° o. y V c i v °° c o 0 c = c fl •on fl Y D ° ? 0 ° a S1 w c v �s m 3 n o a c� c v ons m c."O � Y > s O s o W y n ti a ° a : m 5 g N 5 > W m v cc a 7 c ti ; ° to U 0 2 .� o .E 'a� E _ a o _ `a Q o ° a o b E 0 ° 0 w V on i a°i a= ° on'o y ° ' a a ° o y u ° se w o 5 ro o h Q5 > = a - E a, a > > = ° o v ° cw F c > o aN) o 'o n,Uw °�' Ed n..U% = v R E � a R � '� �° s c c E �? Eb ay+ a V o G >. a w w t ti '� N > to ro c a o y '� .a E v ro o ?' r c 3 y ono o w c c 0 c a, c Q U ER 0 onU a._ _ ro � w c c aa� O Cd .0 o a o 0 0 0 h 3 v o ' �- o 0 a M E N 0 o a 2i � v >c ai . F o Y •ro E •= c 3 •� ">_ o •� o > � w o°'n 2 u a°i 0 aW� v 0 ons *0 tto 0. 0 ° > ca m E n as o a, o c '� 0 3 0 S9 tis �° '� .� .c = E 5 ° y c o ° a tom, _z E aro ro v a °o o° 19 � Y m c 6 ° - .5 0 Da = a s ti 1J r_ ? � U .E3s c .�. 3 .C u ti r.1 L y y �.r N U y 'O O 0. W a E C C o °) c C Lra � L L C ro y F W o a i 4-26 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 r J 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 1 J O O C � C u y R c U _ n. ' yO cd ca cCa c0 y c 8 o r� • m to a p a ° ._ c va v .5 o c , ? c 8 -0 -C a o> or 8 L o y ° 7 v.. a .: o �qq = ro.� c °' .d 72 Y N i>O 0 v '� o o F v3 y C. to C h ° > a tic > t a °= o > 00 v Uv 0N „ xD a c ; y l 003 '/ 3 'C cC0 ti 7 C ro �""., N C p •= >' A..-. O U .-. y �_ .4 .b `o � yo = � = c Rfly � > � � UQ3 ° z _ .� " m = ya C. s p C M .C � CO U d-0 cCC O U rYn �°' ca C �� > y c1 O ayi .= •UV 0 L V c a � s m a aci '� v > i � `o y m e moo = � x a� �e ✓ d v ,�U, °a, v � n � r- 3 ° � = Q T p s U 1 s m o s c v n a a o cn ro C a 3 _ y c c c,� °3 v vc 3 J�_' FaN'+ � C, 'U .N � F O � �. Cp ^0 LF i TC❑, aN b v C ° U .60 .. E-. OpUcC1 3 U '�0 -0 a8 >+s oR o m . > Oy V` cc O C U O C - U C 0 OC wo = 8 c ° g .0 c U ° c a z i n E ��" C ti 8 .00 roL8t -OO 2 a. w O >1 D VOflU .00D Cs GO O W CO "�, •Y�' O Mi Nm U U .= ti s v. a y F C v ti co v ss c a MUo -10 C3 oU o R ca Vi u R rr y y V UC° C O 1 � N i r ` Chinatown Project 4-27 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 1 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES .fl u C - y O i u y V � � � m C/1 � 1 3 x G c y .0 ° c c 3 y � yoy `° Noo r � ccU 30 3 Ec � cU m U tis -L d ro C 9 L C o0-0,Y m cyyJ m t ° o s FL- ° a o c c y 3 c m 'j to V O = U `� 4 .O m ° C U cJ c00 TY a ti a ? T'y o � w c o ° � � _ i ac aw � '= c3 aa� c � E ,° o9tisp oc � � oa > � opy °' a oOD v a € E v 3 -a •y o - '0 M n y a °c° > U a> U c c V •o cca•- ,.. ^0 7 U U >y 6. O O G It - 4U 2 y m U m i E ° y o ro ra o a ° 0 0.-,z c � iaci 'ubAa � -° .� rcv � � � ° cam � � 3 U � aF. y � Eao u n o g U U U m e w 0 3 U o " U U U E y a N c ° w w y D o 3 ° y ou a n �' O •C U c 3 '� y a 0 7 .� '- � U R ° S y Y cCC R 'C C U G. � U >, � 1- m 'O U 0 rL F' C y 30.. CL V O ' E U n ° U .EcpZO3 = UroUU = � > > U � o ecio 'cm � U � 3a E s cc m H m e °�' '� v c a9 c 3 ° m ai o E t°- c E° c °o e - y 3 �- .L O �.w+ C N �. G. > C a0i V 'B .y .> L E CO c U N W O 'O N Y O 3 F U c y > y o a U 7 > t ❑ K C a 3 o f vv c 3 = cQ ^ y c c U •fl U o o a cce o a'3 0o U E c .o o �_ c '° F °� v v c m N '3 . O. 10w ° O > C n y 3 g o c U c > U U o °o'E c y s p > v. C y E U •00- O >,�y w y C c y C 3 'U 6. y 6,_ y c 0 0 C c3 y > ea O C O .to _ OD.°c C v v n a' c7 s d •O •i'=- m ��._. U � � co 0o T s3 • EU E c U E c c F u m d s c E ° 'a._ t w 3 � F c N 3 bo o U o :? ° o • a ai c > 9 a a ' - C y 0 4 U [ y v ' U `' I 'C �a y o c r- U y U 3 3 3 E U 0 -0 v . E Q v o a 3 c c y c fa u _ m a �I H rA 9 U1° a � 0 �- V� o u � d [~ -Cc O C Ell o i 4-28 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 J 4.O REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES J 73 U E = U N Ey_ c= o V E E t.4 a .° M s ° a .� is .9 y m .� is .II � m .° is .a � � ca 'c o .� c .� c R c o .°q c E to U o 3 J °E' o b ° ti 2 •0 v .� y v o b .� h op� t m a c C E E m °' 9 Er— 0 c _V a � 2E � ? E � � QEn � b b aero ° ° to ca U U U V ca c0 c y 3 0 7 0 7 '0.., O O � vi Y C. = M 00 V ^J CD U Tl 00 U 'a ° .y U U c .5t .c_ c _ w c D .0 R r o c E G U y O U ° '� •a� .o chi .D E c° N 0 � ° v ai o _ E � •� ra aEi c oA'C aEi > U «• 0. 0. U a r w c p:° 00 to L J CO m A O bA O "O G .O � m U O TJ C �E O U .0 CO ca O U O cOC G. O y q '� 'fl m O y 0. 3 vi C R C N O E C t V L O cO B E a v U E ° R c - 3 c = c r ^ G ti c o . aCi ' " 3 E c 3 � ti � o w c'E c OU E a .5 v c to M y •D 'aY, v O c.., C m o O Q H = >>. '� U G U R E a.o b � � .E ° > s eon cis t F > U U y y 0. U :: = ca C. y U 0. 0. c m V 00 O 'tl L w N y '7 aVi y is U .0 S ^` to L L w C H = UOz�_/ UF- �. "❑d .3 o on w on cc a� O G o .9 v � ti GU byG O D O G _ E QJ °O c E a°0G,E c g QJ U X to Q c Q o T rq o a U o cc U 5 m > cc r m b U '� y CO 'fl 0..O O •b cs ...r R ... G'.r'y" Q G y „" g =3 a' cc c E c ° 0 3 .., a. � U t � � � as o m c g rCO C c `C o` 'c`' E •`= c E `O ° ai °�' .� 'n c c U ° :x.. U "I V ❑ p i F Q'� .V. F > is .`° -o ° 'O c c`°i •9 F c ,o m E t G m y o C = V ao U •� . Ca o m a. o y �o > w > m J C U G t 7 V G U w r'=n ev 7 �.�. •o Q � c •o ca N _ U cd a' ^7 U .O .U�. X cc J O. -p >, 0 C C U 0 v >>._ a0 O L �. 7 Y m E E `a ti 3 o c v ""MO F, c>a ami va•s y v - . �. U U U U O v V O 0.�. cCQ Es ° U c mY O c ,D c ` s a '_ co_ ° c m C U O U ca U O H U : ca ti ° y vVi .0�. L >+ U = E y ° U O L O ca Y 0 0. �! 0. E 4.. U 0. c j' 'C G 7 c�a q m C/1 O dCL ca T p, � TsJ. p, ccU„ ca C. t >+•fl VLL C W a U � c V Uo ° ° U U -5;° G " Eo r > 3 0 H m 0 E H > c � F 0.y d F w b ti L ca U y A U 0. 0 O ° �. pp'E U C O _ r. G Fy °° vej i o ° q r E E c o o u F o m c c o U G G 0. O U •a O J Chinatown Project 4-29 1 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES "C p _ C r- .r y - C O � u � _y � V .3 'r 9 QQ ,y V Yil G R y � c Oq O p t,G-, •� vi p, Cc- T y N y O y a. E E s >to '55 o o o 3 >, 1zoO W L= 4 bo K v '= a r 5 - G . s • a c=i �j R = o$ G ° >1 N .N.. m L " 3 00 C' ° Q N '.3 O y ,��, •� 0.. OJ R s O�0 _a cGc cY`d R 5 a m m p " v; ' �-' .� C abi >, •> y ami o y a'� t 3 v aai ° 2 �°° .?j s m s m .E o c n c ° v `�" ° - c a 3 s v _ r s c c = w . o o d y a o y R v a = o v ° 44 'v c y 3 = £ .o °vim° c a.Q y o c 3 v C1 U a E o a s R o w ° c o = 0 m =° ° " b m s a a o " = " = c ° cNE y 0 W.� Oq C y T o c0 C 'U .0 N N ` . y av`i y 0. (U o `oo � Y On „ � EO � -- II y o = c .- — M sG U R O - U d G fl F. . N ° R N O .k O E no o G R y "R G c o R a o U c o A s aj s a� R 3 a.4 a h a. o .8 ° R w? a ? ° a cc R o o — E s o m acRi to ° o c s o" y ° E. 0 5 N ° w > U o G r "�' N N R y E c,. F E '� c. OQ N aGi vi �" O G a L g R O� s `• O _ Q' C G G 'V Q y r W O �'°' O. a O ` 'O R R c.. •0 u C 0 r .� O 00 D\ v C 0 d 9 W 3 vi y O �- .~. a s •o n o •c c E c .5 3 = c 0 ° c ec 0 y o c o C U a a 2 0 c o °_' n ? y m o `m ° 3 c on ti = 'y c o .R 3 ti m C3 z F •� c E y R E R . G ..0 '> 3 . F•� C o on a to°� c u o F c ❑ ° > > 3 c ' a > N a " o R o a o 3 F a c G .0 o :. Oa V eQ s ° 4 3 b U ti Q a. 00 R 'O 3 F n, R 00 O R L x V •E ;0 r. ao — .r H b+ u a ~ Fy y � � i U R � C - O N � � q 9 \ 6i C W Z Cc: = 4-30 Chinatown Project Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES � y 'O Lm = > c b ° m c 3 CO y c 3 °a =° y a 3 c Ls .°D ? c .°p = = w O U w O = U ,� o U v 'v M.t: C= � o p E � w C c .4 "> y c � ao.= c 'E s o = a� v m A b U aG — on _ c — �- E a E = E m E - o o L . O -v ra C O.C G y O.C cw0 N Y -0 b is E O 7 p C U 3 CQ =C+ O C vi C w" .�.. 3 O E _ N � �U. Cow'a U 0 ca 7 d 0 "C" U v L C o E a � a 0 E 3 � •9 ti � � E � 'a y � .� G Eooa, .- � Eoo °' = nn (n L L L H U U E .. ti y L en i= c a aUi F CA CD 7ZD L b w Rf G N Vi O'.E J O EE C3 to to 0 E ti U — E aUi U W/ C O L U lV y U (6L L a O y au 3 c a s m u .. L a. ° aQ ° > s z ro v c o cc > E o o c c o no= G . y a. a y y a g 3 c.2 v `cc v a O E c E s c a o . � U E Z ° y ° oU E U E > > > = y y ° o U a c o a0 ° � >o td y E :`� cE O L ya .E — 3oE •� u � s o a> > � E L d z ^`� H $ w. aLi a. Fs.. `° ,� � = �. 1 '� m as G •a ..+ "" '� y LO U .�U+ 3 tz Cn 3 cC 3 cd > L R .3 R C �U � .� O N �._ vi N _ O f °' H E E F- axi E 'y F o U v F" axi E 'y E = L y E c U aao T o o a 5 r <a EL c w n L a u 3 0 y > ro y v >'— r m O3L c� C � G ° 'o> o -o0r 0. CW cc W CO o � CO M �N R C 00 y .'y. G O.'E •v 9 d U 0. _ L U O a V� o ate_ •° E c = a ati CW CW U U •m N v c•J N o = _ J F > a 3to c °?'.Uy a"i c = c = v = ro U E = E E E F @ oa °Ov � °�°�ro 4 rn � � '� � yv a=im Na—°iac.. ' C c E epo oU ao Go a� Chinatown Project 4-31 Fina!EIR Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES C y G y - 7 0o U 0 ECM C o E ti E m a`�i - is E � Gto 'b � 'y y .� .� ti .E CU .y. p C E .a C O10 C GTS CO O c7 O O Cd cc 0 G a - c = oGD a c c ani = r C R L w O U A cd pGj .O T to _ L O h L � L T G^q X d ro .y G p 3 E 0 a O n' '� z O v Cc L CD °J E C 2 4. b °' 0 3 ° ° : y .= E o 0 .a o E ° Y n m ° o y a ti w E o r- -- o ai ° G � p °° GUv oJLC � . � L V - E = E 4 V m V Oy C 4 p V () C k ?) C y O L s ° m O a c L° E cc to L y E CA CO G CD N 'E E O �O V W `°. h N C^J d O �.., •� aj 0 L cd E > p of o ❑ y3 ° a � ": ,�, °a aro 'yE y y y y U W 'C 'GU V cQ oU o eXi o ao o � = a G E U CD w y ° U '� y G 7 O y C U CD '-� ai.CGD O b N �. V G m ° 'a G E V o G EC' p ... O G 4>. > y C •> � fC V 4d C cc vim, J U L' .0 .0 •� O. p,] V N y n..� N Q> _0.0 N oD G ti O C* cj m > E.I O C V] O C .U. m a !d. E ^� Ll c c�i o o _R o v a y q a - o o n C oo 0 o v^ E C - 0. EL y oo yc �m- . .5 .:D y 7 o O o a > O Ca C LCIS ° � � AC7U M -r- QM _ � T � 1 T w C V L G ca cd d U x 6 O U d h h a o U 4 •'O b 4 °tt -- 'fl - V� H a 3 �,•E a o�o.D 'O t O ,� y 2 RCJ O w F m c c^ •o ,, 3 ,� 4-32 Chinatown Project Fina!E!R Addendum-September 2009 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES E 7 C C E 2 E H Ln Cd -f Ir R '3 c c z, E 'y ❑ c E 'N 1 yob E Clz� O b 3 r.+ CLO C o 7 a O C o O a V O N O Cd C E � � 3 •v � ' � 3 'b cy - ` ° N � w r^io d Eoo � - °°° Eoo ° � � V VE � � � oESy <Q y i N O G v V OCZ GA c— r o T_ R E 0 m ° c .3 r t ci t E F ° es � c = a c _ E c h e = s E m m° 0 U E ° C o Q N c y � C E 'o y E y � p o E ti „ o t C.a o o s a u ° ° o m s ccc a; u m ai c c CL ca O o ^ a pwyvrUOpU u c ° " c t: C,4 Ca c a s° ° v n a° °��' s . . . . . . H C T C N a cz T� T.> •_ u W R O N N b 0 y A ° WrA y o c r O V p s. <a ❑ V] 7 U C ° 7 U cCy V O •= N C O•O ° •O E 0C E E " •= � � � � o,'� N ctl O t" U R C Chinatown Project 4-33 Final EIR Addendum-September 2009 1 r 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES i C� CS ti cd tC cD m ou on ou eq y y y ul y 3 3 3 3 3 a m c E E E E a .. y � Cu .G o ti CC - s , F y y W+ 7 � •.E •E yy V L L Ln i.n Qon 3 3 3 3 3 E E E E E � C CID to OD E E E E E z z z i O c aj —1 C y 7 = c3 R =.0u m > on_ c w .� 3 •E c�i °: 3 c ro h0 U > m C1 U i m .` o v u - e+i xv - v ? a mo E � n bOo � Uno Uc v4^ 'W Ws � ° r n ° .: w°Eo to UE - a c � Z • � 3 .c ; O v v � a ca o �, . a'- am o ay c ' d aos E o W ti �.x c �_ ° 30 d c o o EE G) t > CO ao'� a'> j N a"i o o O .� O mzs - O a� O ee Y �.'O a N :E -" -- c o c c eV a U .0 e7 Qi 0 N 7 7 W p <;, k 'n 0 0 c03 O m C) - C4 d .E O e%, U .E s 2m e•i 0 a o a� e•i .-1 a to.-1 -c 2 U i 4-34 Chinatown Project Fina!E!R Addendum-September 2009 J' 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES 1 J Ji J C G C V U U \ C G C bA o0 0A N N N J b _ W n a E y a E E E o •. O V c0 \ 0 i V ° � O1.. V � •� �. > N C O V U V] o C C N u E O' N . _ m ro c E u c s o ocn .o > c on 3 N o c c m . c > o 0 0 o s w z sYt s �' cs amici c os . 3 N > � m a a J ° o c m _c c c N ° m C' CI u0i ti L m y L C .O 4: W Q •fl W G C Q ,E aci N ' E cc a M C y C T N cd V = M :D E N O O ca O a� 00 bA c s .0 ° w z z i 3 U c o >, :o >, Cu E E Ca cd = U •O C+ `° to.- 0 p.K0 U ti m cs =.2 t;. a y as R � aao m0 or, E > cu OJ O ao 0ya� � a� x ° aa as x00Esac� o ° J eri z R s n w e4 a s m axi .E- a. '6, ?: 3 °: U U x Chinatown Project 4-35 �' Fina!EIR (L 4.0 REVISED IMPACT SUMMARY TABLES ` c m U Op 'y c0 .0 h V � ^ � 3 o ? � C vi d o � u - u t CO O ee F H y a+ 7 O' � L � L 'C 3 Q N d � L L L y m E rr :� cxo R c C F a - y C ro Cx I 0 E = 8 z i r CL ° � b o ,o � C O - C y C� o O 0.4. ami Z F 5 c 0 C E .; 000 v° a 4-36 Chinatown Project Final E!R Addendum—September 2009 MSM ;'ON1390M iona+aom°omw gg e mrr�.mr OUZPf6S(S08) �j�D .P1lu'i �Dt 1 I�1NWnfi 9u[we{d �d8[1d E 4 }}} m...��,. K� x°00° a1� a4 , n�iin�s ie3c 901£6 Y�'�!909!�I®5 I A/p� {��\� 50QL'61�1 $I.YQ IA7d E W O V 'ONI 'SiDliIH3bb' 09ZZI me'O'd { I tl ► O l� 1 V I J71 um 4vJTtD MS `.INR'D �°$ g 1--rAL DI[V I N3-nV+ONb21S vn+'Hosmvx xww { srx 3zras I g q g u) }aauS ranOD T=L33M ; ;! swwvv��row amwvva�v a Rrxv IFk r 1 f z v r II 00W o v o p g a 00 I' Oo , Z ci OW Z < I— + C� 'A LLJ U Cifaa m I `= ' A � 7 iaQd AL-4 Y ,O � 3 a L .� > i■ — / is WANE 1r >.. fNOW Mir me wa me rme MRSNow loss —E NEW rw _t t. •. P r. t — U _ \4. •� �ml• plow 5 '.1 � - 9 1 � 1 ` { yyyy. F � 5H Y 1 i - at' ' t >3: a Ir NNW VC 40 I ; t c � Y f t � I - - it amasses ( , F1' ' _ J1 dbdbdk TI �Yr r �V 4• F 1 1 II ,r .J < _ - - I�i �_ _ to 1Ull H' - I � 5-0 , } - r (Q rITA- 4�A, o � d. 30 14 �1 EE Y - KIP• 1,4 Urox ,r r ( I , J p - - 1 r Via.,j ��►.� V ,v y a� I Mix mam ti is es ■■ y■ la .a °QHS!.+ n�i j •�� sl�tV �.'^�� _ -= ;ice:. �.w ._•�<.,^.-�� ' .n i pett: R _ all No 1111 111 1 t }-r ti , t I 'I I6 �! t 1-3 Lj de t � � 1 �o EM Al i I � i I r qi. 1 i � t r� 11 ' i i IT r 419 1 1 N, i •4 �1 ;Y Yh LaVy'. J 1.• 1'. 1 1 w. �w 1 4 1 1 y„ 1 u 1 Jply�JrK{i��1 I 11 1 i 1 h41-.�� yll 4,1 ��•�111 4 ki�, I�•M}I r j OJ.- Ilk GZ �t ♦pie. _...L' � ,� , I t a r I ' 1 n n n n 3" 'j, f It IV I It _ L 1� y °� 4a A a ry..`} 1 � titin }Ei �til I , ` h' ^"`��'� � ,� 'j J . ray� � - L�.�. �; • 'C`• ...� i y ff _ c _ �� ,` ,l�T[y n♦fix_ '/�- ` l,\ �h 1 F r , 6 ' z L �4z , r �I ij 1 T i/:✓ ,.ter. ��' / /'////',.G...�._._,��1;:�� i` J•F� / l / �}'e J! I `•�( _ C _ �f y 1 i mac—,•_ 1i k'-rI II I v � 1 1 I i f I 1 i icy' 7 M1. 0' 1 '} X41 AV Aj I i G , i, -i r7tti � ± , I L { I ham, Ii I 1 I t i i I & • Samoa & ( asso • • o • • • • • • a , ,_� �� • • � f If 5n w.'`` lr `Su'f}'` ry r 'i° Lil r+• - .}Eur r �'r,F� _.��' I ' � I i.im• t�� s..n 'h�.vt'.r n ,.xy �". i I I� y'-�`•�TS�'•�fi�h'.y.'-.-....�i`"�'?t�'4 y:�•�`�•Fi�`��, <� ,s��i II � � t it BILI It L 7 ., Ftp I if •� r� 1,� I u '1111 ,t Iil v � t I ! I-I II1-� 'pp1��r•1 `.:�' � r) {in t _ If t It P UJ� 1 .-Ax � I�itl t'1will t �ItlIlltt i i .cilli ,r '11I 111i r 1"� t l 14;' V i'iittl�i � e I�JI .I 1 1 i I ll it..t I I it t I�``y! I i � � I li Fillr It j I 1 I 11 Gam- ; s �- .. AN _ \1. , tr ��q °, -iC',�«c j • Aft—c p=-,� _ ._ . . , •1 , y � 'P�. � �� r t .vim Y o� _w - � -moi "4`Y',� ♦._-"_ ,, v�P IA. 00 �`� �'.'� �'• t�1�`'�i� �. A 1 xv2aa�°�' ��q�'q�.a�t I LI I 1 � t ¢ ff y i II .h �rhol _ , Y I I> �` I� I 1.� , 1 � � A 1/? l I 1 r rt 11 va "9oI rv , _V 1 Ag 11 111111 1 � Jp • In I� �� Ipr /1 Ilr ll'li�l' Ir�! ��1 �`II � ! 1. ' r � � 'r I•r r I Ir(�IIr',( /111 ,1'R1 �r�(��t�'+1 �L—�'''-I � �1 o.+ ✓ iti..-�._ or�A rn�.- -• NJ rosR�ba� grrr 11- r^ ==sem •,r ; Il , : � rll i r f 1 , ro r Y � Y `+J lYl � �+1.„,.;: J �� ! 1 _ ,r 1.' Q FI r al �.•- �'' 1 1 ;..of w 1. p 1 K" ' • i !l AV le 1 1' I1'71° a�,l 11'.'16,: Irv" � �� -- •� y{� ---�, -- 7 1 4IIII JJffJPr a _ _ _ V. �I .......( .� t , ( q pq _ I Ll � 1 u rru li [N lOu>i� a rDY+ Alfy � c I h V)- 7, I °�'1��i 12t� "5�ti'l i ..�,nr'j YY�•l! 'F tC�M�l�ib _ . [1 --' } 1 r�.s uFT�"}.' 21�"a7-rr}i-j•�—.ti'�U'�"FJ} � _ — IN y t t''A r{ �rtL. ..�w a.r;�,+• , t .:... -i is� I ,.. . j lr ijl�r��''l�(l1 , ry't � r ' i /L�lifl r .. C 1.:`__� ay'• „� .�y��.. J �fl.l1��li jl j (1 n � , 1111''il'lil 41�r11� 61j �'�r r i11 r' y t I fi [ ��( f( 1 ,� I,•rj j��'�ii,, , I,i�141��rr �� f b�, r�� 1�1��`� - �_ -- - — --- �� a -=I IJ 1 �. 7k."""• � ... Fes,, ,�'�C r.l(:� I i - d ra�,it p rx t { � Ito 1 y d•' ex4n, _ o — -_ [ILL: J ( I 1 »L It 1JI' loo POINT I{ r 1ff1111� - r fjitAt II(� r � 4!w �� ,► NCO , - � � f:.;J_; ice, -ob low �=v b • • • • n - ' � � ' � • • a l_. �h j V.I-� . ��t C111 L ir t7 17 Lr nL�al -o 5 � n t L�w� r - L II la r ¢A��jp�� L,,',�,''� �I' Iii fl Jn,ll 1 l�'fnC� l lei ` on_amu• It,�' a - ci i.d' "•-[t_ a.:. c o 'tt r l 1 �U Pr ll r 1 r-r�t "1 4AIP 45_I 1'�Ir �wr kt 1'�!-ia`rr ri n L3UG.�Sistf wj"ar'rPl l_ rf ._ �, rl a r\ _ 7 I .�� a "I I! III I t . 1 l'�tc �fi" IG7 a i ' cv��-II1�.., �. i, r ' n t r is 1 r� 5 1 •r, iN ' Li oN YJ'•I'f .--��,�i'•� r+�.n II pnc t z ^J= p L�e.- 1 � r} li t x'71,4 K i r la ox' �s t CJ `k is tn'lfi .I t t ;i Nil 11 �.�t] `J-tipp� n n 'tl��• iY v � r. lrJ rn ns r y y---� � 9 n �x q Ita- I it v a eP o r tee• f~--" X II n x r r. 3!'1� • 1.a y 'f 1' 11 a ut� , a '1' arh'e o J I S :. n, rU_•.t� n u4J�4ov u..r•cnn a: uci � �� ^ss 'urian o� ,v ip_ u __-- •{ I i r _I • _ - ---- -- -- a `\ t,1 r� j 1, r —�CC_�.;fry 1?ry T, l- _Y '•\ l I r l II I lr S . ..-.y...�..� tI -��,i •1 �� ,,•�� l �I.r�.', ul,_._ ,L �( � ` � �� '•, Ott�,11,I" � � k .]i t '(r 1 �� t � 1 .:.�• IBJ-`�—�� i 1 1 _l� t ta` n •' C l^O O_C�rG,, lal' � L 11 � �I 1 ` r�r ROo�e;q as ooh o e as 11'F1 M ..a•. r �, f. - — J v�tl I((II�I U r II ,I i 1 I t �C i ..J 11 _ r�1 1 t li6D tJ) ♦�4ya I S r I �' •�'alt YY4R' a®r1 1 . 101 y{r1 1 I - 1 I + 1 I.1, � '1`' 'i I F.- > i lit zrrl I i I , 17--77M i F77 l � 1 j I i 1 [EN, r 1i=1^ LEN., 17' _ - -- bases so ' ��t ] > as { yy , ' r -- I I 1 { I I JJ. d _ r � , ---- --- -a \� ( I � I V y - ---- - } � t } I i , ' V � i• ' --_- ___-_ II 91 IF1' q _ � •^j } `ate 1 �.'� I• � , 1 y,��,.SII r' ' c 1� - - d (_ J"'{ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I$LL'y� 1r.� I lit I ,r, )y� { �! ,.��"��#'• { � _ _mac 11 I � II ININ r1/ \ Ir i, ---� Mf I 1 I -r I \ 11.. "fit ' I l ...... O-7 i L V I _ 71 F _..._. r i M1 I a IYI ( Q i base • • ( C , c C C. ) C • • • __- � f I O \1 Q . — 1 o � I I ^ niJ,,� _ - cu 71 — _ C a _ � 0 i o yz/o 7nnnn n ( ,rack - i o • o O O a O , 0 0 o o 0 C I t G _ 31 SI , .f' f lit � illy. t � o J77 _ _ � r 1, p -..�^'°f,.�-.mac_•d - — - -�� - I ., � .�. h ..>C./✓ C;�G1 - (r11+I)I�1/jI{'I � o _ `G .r _� �� if ` +-1C4 t,..I 1.1.E_.- _i i / lL�l • Y i pop. `.o( �o I •� 1 1 1 - .l.. :.{t if�.0 J.�b•-(•'i' Yi. !•� ` -..'f y /jam(, ',Uy _ � � S� _ _ f---"_�I 1._.- --- z1 - - . f I 1 CC> e nnOC) nnnC 0 C000 1 i III I i �tII,' c i Ill II,I I ,1 IIFi 1 t 111 i 0000eodooeoaooe rte' u G I t IF 1 —4� l � i f 1 1 1 �•II I jri I n.'r u t t s .I 1 1 i — f I w^ 1 _ 1 I �> ( a A IRm mq L115011 70N JZaf0Hd a➢g i IOUm40'•WDM�S E IRY6••MI�ITE OOZP£65(508) lmi!m9^S9--uId 35OdH[ld j :: n.:�x i.v o' mws•movePy.s 90K6 YD odmg0—,I-S � a `o:.�..iiw••••mi v•••',. m+s•I+a+wnw GOOZ'SC•Slof 31tlO•I.O7d o "LOs oa 'DNI 'SiDKIHO?JV W J77�+Maa�mD O75 ;IKff1J 5 • d � v I N311V+ONba9 �NO� N M O ld N I F� e F En � s - 3�tl�s ➢�� Q8g smpsq$}g 1,-afoad -TUIL Imss v 0- w g a u 5 E -° C 0zfifi 0 7;0 np Y—b g 0 ❑ Bd S �a A:8 Nv u u "CJ $ E E a .. N A $ a a e � � 0 0 a ++ v ^qp"! mor L0 0'�• u p&. '� .� f--� m ❑ 5 rte" 3P' .8 w m rn �7 v, "o U N G. Fi G V.G 'Y N tC W 'O EI Yg a 'g q C q g y W •� y Q 9< 5.0 $•5 „ e > 0 5 8 a 0 GJ u Z a F O a 9 cg c4 w w �"w w w �a g w" czj w cj w 10 Q a •_u u w 2 pc -A -I e e u u . °m °uric 5r a �: .1 .� :.1 t.1 .• e1 M 1.1 N N N fn z ^ z ^ 9 'J p ..� .-. •'^ 6 P N N of f`L tJ ..f N " P .D 'O .O V • N ,y0 R 8 NrypY rypY (gT� T ^^YY�� p n �c4 gag gag EE (f � a wwgwwr i � a a@ CZ f1.Q 8 Si y Piz T m U ,O L Yi m Ti.� N N Ea ^ ^ \ 4 rN _ GG o L' rd. a mu U d U r a .5 O $' ES+ a N 8y ag Q 'S e Vco cc u u •�a u � r u SJ�O 8 u 6 p rJ'•. a 8 5 E .d a a O E � 5 � a as � a O NUS, 8� o �j� sp� � � ,� � "' � g v+ 4-0 a u tj �' u D^ 3 C .7� �.o 'a WJ B \ o a �i R3 b,Q s is ° .g c §o -82 2a a ° x � U 6 ° " 0 a .r LLLSM !'ON.LMfMd a3 y wma.ao�raoo4n�w $$ 8 4 IRi6'MMorMM 3 LE'E mmu OOiPf6S(S08) I�7i!uq>'S$uMuld 350d8[)d 9 $ jj 9OVf6 YJ'�!W s- ®5 ,::.�.r......r....-, mac'x•a_v�m I 6='SLLI�I $LtlO3.0'Id exp a°E W _ SNI 'S13311H3bV M=Xv N M O l� N I H ��,� W ® N311V+ONd218 vro•Nosmvx xwwSig (lac LLxLL) .a•A8=•L v-e 8 CA g (lac 9£x67) .PAb-.L 37YJS gig mid a3?S UMaAo MM I a : w a u, co ,m ra a p _ •D u > U a a „a so aO _ M .Laauis ONaOWAft a e y 64 a �B O i Iu+d I i i �__• — j �a-Ea 3 0 i �� r LI ab lob co _ _i m B r'- F pq Q � m 0� Y WP�d I z to E € BmpEma zxu?9cc!S E' Au ' i E 3IJ 99 is I �Op W X11 11 1 Ila aaaa.Ls OusOHo '4 o II I II I 1 '� _ I illi 1 FF E v j O r z IF- b • • • • • ( ' Jo " _ ) see twos -oxr03tosa =Bp i3 ION44�1%9YOM.S gg EE 1 IRMK'vaRov'M11r 7 Ks OOZO-M(SM) fmuugnS Swweld 3.SOidN[)d 5f 5 o&qo em1 ms 1-- m.R'We..anm �CC6 vo I 6=BOE knf UVG 7t71a SNI 'SiOII HO�jvJ-rd ° N M O lbs N t N311V+4 M�9 viv`xosmvx xavw I -- nMw�o ozs arm�o ° � # €ld x vj :3zvos a I )£ ��MUWWV asal9�vm�v �>� Uejd Eze[d a-„T MME 5 { �_ •8 9 0 2 S�j g a g:° L .� 9.x - C B d a. _ H a ;i•0 S $ H ,� �' 1F �. S a b o tl 371 a°2. 8.��a•� 9 •b B °• e S 5:�a O C � g,�j5�gg�$ ` ''•v9 i' .`g'� y �5�� ,°�. �6 9+r�� ga•� dSS � B •ap- �p �pBS Co v .5 5 N ... 0'� Eg 5� ,y�g§ gy�•� ^�� .5 § 39 , ,x. w .9 .b� d °- o aN1$2 �g �agg �W a C�$ zaaxis 0xx0w d o Via" Via: a \ nmmy amg .pry O °. E �" �'h �' iii.:---'• IPI I II{i v v k � A l; - w CQ 9 i ao t a �_ ® cij.. I . •'•� W ae �, 4�" �c�`' 'err `LNN `^��',`�� (� �a W � � � m '•c^' Y+�C- � ':+c"' - - b0.' Q H ° 11 TTTT � � - r �� ---- - ----- 0 8 W � � W z FZ 0 04 12 �B •� F rA �� .9a F �� w u°. a°a F a a I a I a 62nS doqD z z I z v 6 .LEMUS ODUGHD o Y61K0 hVv Nvlrew.n° Lit= :'ON IJ3(ONd p°l$ ![ IEIp9WPJ'aMY°M W 9 j E s uvwa•.vaeMlvr .FYI E ooxo-ces csos> teajwv°s suPugia --Asoaxtu 906[6 V'J'adSWO awl BSS dlvclt°E �.. '3NI 'SiO3JIHO?JV o9uime x N M O ld N I nMuA+wmuLDo1S �ibam G y W N N311V+dMS viv'No vxmivw fn � �Fgwv mumomv a npv m°powv amut>,v uvId�TBMapis MIT, r3AHS a ; lis sb o v a, o �O �y vE S v o o c S k 02 n � a Soo boay T w m a 2 w mUO > OV. 5 N II.V o o �� 5 �5� ( ( p S p a tl a e � 1HEVuls O )DI 0w a- dmy ',)f•IDIHVd )N f 9s'7� 44T Q d�T �1� �T Tmi�ei T T m 1�y r T aT T 1. xvd oN LJr b \ =max=eats 3: � n mvm 3 �o -C E a E too Cn L'Lf:c �. `r J L iii E PWol zFa z ® v v o ly 0.5£ H. ..... m F I �c • a.r R.: � 7� IE, E Ili r"4C7 A c I B off « yoz1 r i El I. 0 I T— o ® / w a '�B w .9-.6 . cM €a N 16 c O z z z ° 0-101 g �3 mu ml 96 ° A Icy b 'JNOIBVd ON 9R1P°B Q 8.J 814vsl�muwlloJ °' 6 a 6 '9v"J�J 9NIXYYd _ B Kul w .-HEI-d I.S O'dUGHD s • • • • • • c ( c . � ; � . ) . � • • • • • • • I I• i �f Jill 11 r�uuuiil! !- \ n, mnnnm ►1 - hip a IIIumlul �` IIIIIIIIIIII� _ ■i I • � ��I� F. � IIIIIII1IIIIIII � �, � IIII J :"#.,�,, 111 ' i i J 111111 � �� r•� ::�.��... ■ WIN, \\ \ L --- - i � �i:9fil!Illi!I\� _\ L4� cn5oa -oN.rMfoxa ionnao<aemmw gg E mrvru�w 007A•L6S(508) - IealnugnS 9ul-eld 350dNfld 9OK6 YJ bdx!go sm®S SAF 09ZZI m9'O•d N M O 1`� N I I--I 60UC SSL�I :�.da. y{[ $€ W • 'SNI 'S1�311H�aV r�arni�yy n1 wAgv"o 075 :J ll= 6 ! W v' NBTIV+QNV8G viv Nosmv-dxxvw (�9vrorJ o-,oc-a 37v�s � { gig Id ?pfl len;daauo' :A"Iiri .res � e ca ca f�. a u � -e O y V a- f SS SS SS SS SS S 55 55 ADO a • \ AO��I aPL(fi � Ilam a U.LIJ Li v Ln Boo }s I Ln —u � �`d an U --' IP m Uu) '�"�1-�h .-C Tom- I U , U • $�v Ss SS x= ❑ v W Lj �_ o J M H I U Z Tu auroyo -syr o IC H cls ` W Y lam '; / I" n oo / / H 0 O SS y L—J ° ssI cn B�zl a ins dou 8 z z I I ss N E \ \ Ln 3 a 7M iaaxs oxxoHD 7M 7M 7M .z7M 7M SS SS SS SS SS Ss SS SS SS wlnm sm LILSOiI rON D3IONd I�U4CpJWlYl�lq OOZPE6S(SOR) IeA1�4�58 e1d 1C1d 6 L ncil�-os 10]C aw�i.mw.�eol�af SIISE6VJ'adc!gc)s ®S 13 f�6 °w.Ir,n'�"1^l.—• 600z isz f 31YQ.f.07d F# p SNI 'S1�311r�LV Omt-GlJH U N M O lbs N I 5. III W ,yyrrnQDyY 717uesaowpp075 �ItS-0'D a •� $ @ W L N311d+ONVII8 Yry'xosenYa NHYN � l€ x (;-LDRl) &A -a I°p ;I (A (;-gmz) &a-.l 31YJs II� Ogg ULidSUTPWD[L'm&:)UOD -x 'ME �MN�•po®v atiaW>ryz�v aswfya+y Co ti 9 .A u f6 w�1 yy��L YF H a�IP.S il,.:a4S,"5 Ys'I B`Y'AMF'caq a A CO —U_ J. Hx s O O (' R IIII I I I I I I I jxnmx INN 2pxD Ona n>y mm 1 1/ 21 't �i � ' g 0 - - - ' -°� 31 111l � A Ili Ilfl Q — — — �y U suippe 8 I 1 �v�15 I I — -�l HV d a oRBoPuooyll I — Hill 0 H H H7 T-LTFI � gg o z I 9 I LLL90x rox nafoxd v 9 B g p ionawn<ammw m�iu�� OOtlFE6S(SOB) IoAP+WnS Yucuuvid 390.Ixfld I;r+cii�.us ,vic 906E6 YJ'�!90 e!ml®S Bill °1�,.1,.,�, mos'�m®olw 60PL'OEknf Mval 7d ��"�Od �N M Old N I F ��= f W SNI '51�311H��V I—a=xy n�Ww�maois ;umr� s a ; . 00 ® N311b'+aNd219 vro`xos avx xxm 5C (7>s LixLT1 «0•.04=.L �°q�' i_� U) W9Exw .0-,Oz .L TIVX Bt3a ueid owaQ /uuId a4ls Sugsixa 7= a"dsw`V UM'Mx I r \T I . --- I s gill is y @ (� t r F-1 w ` -- a : z PQ T x - � p J 1 r II W F� 1 I r r I 1 I � r 1 � I 1 I I I ale _ , tmJO4h.X- -FMV�v+n(� } a� - -' _- -1z I z° .8 z i g B W d � a gg ar g I >, I Ey o I ��aJcsuav 'axis gi base • • ( a � .v*aw,Aev.vr .®ovm v�ov alsm "oNLowoud RI i 1 iouw�wa�wroenat � E E ia�v6•vrtenMe, �`II: m�i•am.�.m 0OZPf65(So8) ofw...o•.wwg 1e0pu9^S 350dN[]d 6 s $}$ 906£6 V0,04 0�T®5 v _ri+�—a«-.•e^ia«, a4eR'oeTVWAWI &� )y E � DNI 's1D31iH3av 1=9 ��M O l� N I F� 60D1�G�) : Ida : W N3lltl+4N11a8 vro'Nf.U.GD xxvw (iaa GTxii1 .0•A6-.I �•y e�� tJ) (lae gpcq� .PAL-.I :31VJS 8� �� VMPPIV aprpouv4=HLPJV WUPDNV � Weld IaA-"I4aaJqS Aaxa U0W :a".u''MS FLO C a O a3 u c� o Shy o � .o.�-oai x co u 9 �pHp LO u� um i 1 d z 8 Y g��, oy� VVc a p4�' Hpggp•'f r•..�ttp VA I `p• a a G. •� o. y 9 NNN O d,�app" II..� Gu m u 3 P.&0 pu: CR Q a�Y k'i E m rJ' 'a II.� a •7 N dN• < O n. O1I2IOYQ �� $$ � a -�3 x a� .Lai N o Y � oAm 50 • S Cn �i C . •G'� �. w u w C O S 1—Y T71 0 - - - - 0 w 6 \ �a I v F v v e e FFFFp d i.l 7 m '✓ O MN F( ~ m v e v v z �e Y$ II � YR W q g W v v � w 0. z a o zyy F8 IHHUIS 02I2IOHD fsaaesseseaa aso • ease a C ' ) & - ease mn�Ewmmw LLLSOY `ON i'7d[ONd a iar i IRS6'PRTCNTBE E mgr DUO-F6S(508) IaNpa4oS 8ruuuey� •••••• N 4 } 909£6 vo t&Wo o1P1®S :r+r.,mrn•„^rv�+ mtoiawmmoai 600L'SI�( 3LdCl.LCYId 3N 513 Head � od INMOIVNIHD ', �, ,) ,IN311V+ONVH3 div-Ros n�vx xxdw I:y f ;j m � (> ZMT) ,o oo=,L (w qMz) .0-,oz-.L -XLd-.)s a ��a� 21M=" �� sUBId Ianal=Id MM MRS : ; y W ° � v3� � 9cj aaS y W980 S q S mr..0..S3 '� btw . a :: gi $ eZZ 4ibV LL G �• v � ava �doEu� n $ Ws ? .a.�` o 0 9 � � 3 � 5 Y a z z a � ' 8 o a b °1 u $.9 o u'e7 a u u a N -too a am :: g m s o 6 41. a e.1 Fi f/J •J' Y Y a z m iHHxsS OUxow U0 we K a v cc amd � a •7 •a � �-I m ■ ■ m ■ ■. ■ 9 °� 7 2 Fq t I s x W ■ IW1 I 1 1 1 ■ ■ til 1 •� p .: 'n (yyL 4- 4" (ti 1 1 1 �-A 1 1y 1 1 V � • l 1 1 �1�■ 1 • � l 1 �� 1� ■ ung�yQy Q Sm i d Q b oo.p� sQe&uemsapad 1sa& 0 8 W a � a v� o U e W n � � W e e z a a � O z V I I I I l .LHHUIS O'dU0HD o :,ON g p .¢mvmu.ow awn .L73IONd a B8 ,o�awosawoo�nw y i¢wa�+.aorewwr 9'$' m�r,m OOZO-£69(508) Imauqn59—uuId `t¢ 90K6 VO*od 4o vm�S '� 6 1 e s S� 'SNI '513311H32ib' 09Zz1 X09,o'd z mwv N M O iV N I F� n, a1s -jub= W N311`d+QNV88 tlltl'NOSmvxxxvw 41.. 8_$i x (Fa LIxIT) .0•A6-.I �,a°y � to (Wgxvz) .0•Az=.I 31tlJ5 3i gig kI I IaAa j jaaS uqed YILII ims i;i f i t go � u 0 w 9 Y t W co r g JOS so B m 9 s 25 oa LK 11� Jq O 0Op a6 Aft U R-+ O O a q t C o a • � _ �R y kLuzi H�.......3 d u� !�•Y o Qg •� .a 7 Am m mF7Ela 1 LJ u � P z i z a o o ® �rps 0 m 0 0,' ' 00 rm �Ii�tk�usrusapad i � � c� a � am it a zW CIS Cd 8 Qui C7 � z 0 z z z z� zw Q 0 ion�wroanw LLLSUlI -Ox.IJHIONd yaig 14 i¢w'aaarn i�ffa E!1 rrnmu•n — ____. Iw7N'9n59ufuuufd 3SOdNCId OOZ0165(508) .nan,-os �+e. ma+vima.o 90�L6 tl7'�WO n°7 m6w/` Q�" a7lo� i� f, y y Fy ww.in+e..�i v.., ewanawou 509L'SL Ain( 3Lyclorld $F P W ^1 • SNI '51�311H�?Jd oszzlma'ad INM O L d 1 V 1'Y�LTTTD,dv 711�^o7o��D(YLS '.I1afL� IHD N311V+0NVHS vry•xosbv-dxam - (;-LMT) &.o6=.1 (7ae 9FF4Z) AdR-.I 31YJS D�D.�' > s PLvYa.r�v mid Z Iaea'I 3aa�4S�d Tu La�Ts Rai III d OJ e � O a E ,a b fl o Z E F Cs$ O '� y e , tvejcu q ��ygo fnaF W rir - ❑ w co �r J,aa111s oxxow o w co I D < 4 < 6 < I ° Z a I 8 � i me < < fl R rj 1 = f,� i• r r r �tl N t' t .. ftr.t�it iltEll'`�il W 9 ,Ilfl i f{ , v Ili��)d {tlili EE1 j[ €�If�� U7 I ; CA a 9 3 0 (D m m fa m < < 6 6 X I I I F � U � z I I w x w H z O o Z Z n Z m Ci s z J.HHU I.S ODUGHD • • IS IS IS , ) ) n . � • • tea_ LIEM ON MabHd ^I 414 rouaw.tmm�nw yy !E we+sv.a..Mw 7 s oozo-L6s(sos) [eultu9ns�Id 390d8f1d �...W�.. 9DK6Y�'�QOa^I®5 .<.<=a.�s•,va, �.wts.s..00,w 6WZ'S1 Alk MYCI JD7d 09M xos'ad Co 'DNI 'S1331IHDad 13aUH321v 1 `I 1 Y ► O iV 1 V I H DI orn wmmm4to Ols +LNL•Il'D N311t/+GN"S viv'NostAv21 xavw (7acGPtLT) .(F.06-.i y _vP CA (7x 9F7t47) .R.QZ-.L 31vJS 7�� s9n!twv4v �+!twvmiaow w+nn+v Id£IanaZ�34S�d 3vi1..t�Ls a ; CO O1 (W1) a a � E I~ ad 8 aS o 's ¢ P x IX a czl 02 U J.,a9U I s OU)ION o I vit co I p 6 < < 6 < 4 C \ C C H ti H H m I za x O ti w < < I a 1 it dllDk`r III `gin t < 0 ❑ OtEdkf IkP� it !1, t�t' d .tf r,t if — t ,f �� T EI ltl,EL rttt t t ` O A +ldltEftlrEltEfl 1F..EEEi Qi Cn w I 5 �l;;tklt Itj W It it F M tt W • VE V) • A Aty @ H C O W Q Q I C m 0. a c U z yg 0 2 Z a \ a z a z IHHUIS OU'dOHD o MCME 70N 103IOHd yyu B g iocew -"o m ia.sn•wao.arn me,u m OOZO-£GS(SOS) lw—ga4 Supmhl 350dufld 6 5 Pg mturtu--n u:: in'os io�a a« +wna�i 90K6 MJ'od!W�'I-S 60OV91 kn) :31VG 101d �]{Z � s ovl'f1..:4aa n:nl0 aof g I W 'SNI •513311HO�J'd y7a1II xv N ! tl ! O iV E �7 t H :) '1 7rt DOSS .Wffi'D s ' $ a5 W IN N3M+ONVNS viv`Nosmva xxvw /. - (wMTa (WgM6 .0-AL .L 37YJ5 3i3 sae1,1 I001J paSdEPXq iaea'I=Icl M37AJ1 V A•i � ryn m Q] O .p V1 b u a C 0 g 8 u ae Y + W �. � - n n e •� a v V � W ltuv Flip fa w. + m a 8 �8 " 0 Q ] � m � N ol IL F-1 71 ❑ ° Cl O n + + ❑ ❑ CS : LIy ionm.nsewmaw T.50}I :'ON gig YYY la+sss=.a.. 7�}s 1 OOLO-f6S(SO)0 I°RP°4a5 gW=eld 3901dNf1d ;Helm,nes tv�l ews.�+aa.� 9UM6 YJ'N!9 S-1-S �°� 600Z'S[�( 3StlQ 107d }E{� �� 0=1%%'Ud fi 6 SNI sl3]llHDav 1_'Y&LMUV N M OiV N I D 7l1umoleuFlDO'LS :.INS iji, ,l, x� N3llV+ONVR18 VlV'MoSMV"Hxxvw (7aeam) &zz-.L $8'p S3 c� (Y�9fxoz) .0'�OI=.L :3'IYJs lilts }}g eliooLq pa$iePr3 L IaI�d :awl,res ; wd n ;B M N N cn m gr, o .Gal 6e, a- �1 L J 5 I + CL L J 'ISLI' L J ❑11❑ _ _ ❑ ❑oc C{� gg m Lo yq j� y LJ �1 U {ti L.1 q i Y LJA r� j� IF I IL J O N ❑ y r + � m � u #� �LJ I O I L I J� �I I 5 LJ LJ s +. 0 LJOC ol � a` 3 d b Dy O O � w P, v U > 4S NO .� cn uIr—, =❑ ° • ❑ PIT Q ° � e LJ LJ co L, Y J fYl � 9 I n y� Vlfi - f l 11Lyy � .�•�yl Ll • /. M e Ec cl CH S' LLIy p y mro�m wro�nw SON 'ON IJ3IONd y"� 1 p mWiunu;o UOZRE6S(S09) I¢NFWnS 9uryueld 3SOdH[]dWALUZMA n® wwwnmaxmc 9DK6 VO'04gOM -S, 0Z1 eHO Lo SNI 51�311H3LV - �'s� j�fN3llt +aNHZB vrv'xnxxvw (wLxL) .0--.OV-.1 fld•�H x gig MJOO I IIUXaAO air*r ,yam ;j fit v � mn ss •� �D � � N i+1 S m a � p o Q, S 0 5 Ord oe. C6 � e rpia U .L��2I.I.S 0U'a0IN o \ — — — ,— y O I � I z e_ u QpI � ; lfik t€int''tji V` Eii�Ett t(€�' O m Ll U a il:. �qt {`j �i }i ik i m P4 ItkVtl: y C7 E,tE f' ,.� IlMl IN. i]€4j!(�! v F CCI ti€ E f� E€tE€i w' E t E I ! E W I �qt€!! ktlrn Et(E W ltkt r a- ' t H pr � at� as O _. a oLi Q D I Q I I x �m a o�� c U z N g fQ C7 z z z a a ❑ z .LHH2IIS ODUGHD In LLg iaa��aawrnw LSUII 'Ox IJ3IONd Big F1! m�rucu 11111"E6i(108) 1MNWri59WRIeld MOdNl7dOWN nol�n-o� ,>s, arr.viv_uR 900E6 YJ'* 40 r.I MS ''w�'•i..,rv...•.�.i r.., cos'.a.mow 600L'6l aun( 3SYC1,L0']d 5 33iH ad 09ZZIso60d N M OlV N I 71T+snWeuRDOTS p , w �'Y.I I LH7�jy N311V+aMd88 vwxostAw xam ((nn (7asLRRi� .ROY-.I p (Ps gmz) .o-.oz-.L ,3T#-.)S Ii }}o s SaopgnaII ioualxg -7=IMM a�rlyv� v �arvYsl•PONY i4 yyV u 9 � v 8A I I Oil a I( 5 ( i a. � r i 1.1 �-.t l �� •§ � W e v v Ep as s ' a Qp -s V 5 m I Ca V I ¢' R r (a i r ✓ G7r p m W IERI FFR r� m o .d.0 L, C. I o �.. v) y Q e � a m rn f m v i0 0 (U, . • • • • • . • • • . • • � • � • I • - , • • s i • • ( • • • • • • r , • ' AA pyy r0n w�a LII9N �'ON SJ3�ONd 1''E !!t ivaa.w»mrtn� y�0: rxnon OOWE65(S0� q cm»� @RILu4nS 9UM+Rd 350dN[ld a Its «ci-.-os irs, ow°.4J+A�a.3 90VC6YJ'�°!^7®S A /� ��'f/ �I ��—gQ' ` i x:'m�r:=•c^'ic�. �'Si3 smw I\/, o tl 1 V ��E G ^'p 60UC'6Z wn( 37.tlQ 107d 6 ] 7 wa • SNI 'S1�311H�?JV oa�n�. ,dv V v O Ill UAiNM*o CIS �1:1= a .I I I a x N3TIV+QNV218 vry•xosrovx xavwEoaa iii $'° (�LDRT1 RSI�.9L/I 00 y _ (iffi 9P@T) .RST•.9/I 3ItlJS II al� aq� SUOI aII pac4iejug 31ru r$Is a .S I O -C_� j � � •17 M m � � ♦r u JG 0 ui CIS > t a a z O•p ___ U � m E W N LiN / I o � I I _(jV�_ ��'`i O O y4+ (iyQ I Y A l app a�a Lp7Iy' .1^r�+' x I g $Qm '—.---_..1.,._,L ,y,..,..� J r fir.: 'S _ pO 9 •:7 4 i , 1, � a 5 j 1 w +1 � r-T•-q N 'I OL cau a ------------ I I li, I t va 9 gs , d u9zcc Q — a «9-.8 mow. ZILCM ;'ON MafoNa B p 9)4 �anwaweammw y E 1 A iR.sa'na�Mw S�1_Ta w Manss�� soaxna c B g g f mnent aM OOTSYF6s(508) Ot7ll11Ary/f..oln Wl,��n.a4�7Yi Cpl B a a ;nuyi^dos ++3, ewwoor<aww 90K6 vD Ws:gO-n=S ��. - I Bitl F. ,-- .,•„o•., o¢w'owwww 600Z'6Z mm[ 3LtlQ 7.C71d • 'ONI 'S1:)311H3L!V W N3T[V+4Nb219 vry•xosenvu xavw INf x (W/.My) .0•.1=.91/1 (W 9E� AI�.S/T 31Y.JS B��e '�gs �Muvw� >24�� Uf=v SUOI u V e s V V CJ g u qO p w J .4 �• 4. �A W WCx m aj r— .. -- v� _ N - > °? xa I• _ i — iw — a , l P pw db db a L lsm :,ONL-mroad Fig P3 wuw!»•maom�w g E m46•p.nmOlnr 7 Aa �runu a ew�+emomw� ooiRwc(6„s..(. S. 1Mk1�' '�°��ll/1 67t1Q?i;,l7 Imuuans 5wweta 3Soklxtld = JJFF jjjsj .�` nNCIe:'.]S lO3f 169M XC!YV Y. .,nv,e,.M�v=.i �m>•a.l�io �"I®S i (AQL'6Z atm[ 3LVQ Z0'7d ryl • 'SNI •S1O311H�at Tlrir N d V ! O i V l V I �� VtlfOj°�oms um7J i N3T1V+(1NFRIB vrv'xosnvxxww LIXTO .o-.I=.91/1 090@7) .0-.1=.9/i TWDS 0 saopenaIIpa$� 7Nvtl alnMv a�awyvmv aAa!vyv JAI =-;� a. Ga v zo c Q ewe ` 9y 8 it R�,I � �aB m o� r t i b a G o _ -- y 7CIS o .s-.s t=nfr"'e� v v N 0 0 o O n 0 o � 0 a I ^ �JL'� 'L' 'L _L a _ `l)A Il P. J1pgl7T�� G P A o a� r 1 I i 05� ' a7 1 � g y 6 o I ..6-.L e • I nvurro:w LI qu roN lmfoad -gig @!! iaua�wvammw yy i¢.srcv.ax�. 9 8: ooxo-css c00 ,p� tw�rogns aw-na 3sottana iia ¢¢¢ i��-o. >jz vvwwoovyvy� 90M YD V&WD an WS - _ _ Ate' yg j y��' � 'w��..ur>b•.•i v.•. �+v6 W6vwI)iw 000L'6Z amj 3LtlQ IA'ld EE 7� w �N '51O31 HOaN --almo9MI=8 �d I xv N M O IV N 1 m ops :.l, �i t �I W N311V+ONV88 vry`Hosmvx xvvw (iaa 9FJ'i?J .o,oc-.I -dTix III Ogg �� wMRMV GUOT aII ioua:�xg 3vu JMM r s o �y M x n CZ x " to U. 1 VA �� dl W O !dam T. �� c s V e.V' � . j 1 � >,. Q y 4 ❑O C a c < t Oti �,�; iun�eaoo°mw� LLLSVii "ON D3IONd -Big 44� ia.nweorq,w '}�H- 2 sur �a OOZO-L6f(09) I°aNr4^SBWw°Id 350dH[]d ps }}} WKS VJ'°d490 yMMS �;„,,.•,„,„»..�,>�.., m.Rv.wa.o°u 60QZ'6Zam( 3LV0I.O•Id F . _ SNI 'SiDHIHObV N M O 1� N I '0=1 109 � J7'lumieu{�D 075 .EAID'D 6 e} N3MV+ON` HS VtV•Nos' » #� ! ;i I cn (w gvcw o.01 ��M� �� SUORBnaII 'S c n�LEN [�" � ° c A �. FA W B k � 8 E6 ,ggu��' � > a t�. U 0: LLI LE N zi ? Cd t o m— 2 v a' ;-4o d W L I LEI r c. rr r uW G me �u;w a ti 5 ” > a _ ls . all v gS o ga. a c L•} �� .1 �_ yq ., 8 a •� 5col e aTg 8 w� v m .www- �w•I{. I 55 € }°r D SE �3 � 5 F - � u•$, Yioo J 0 BZ 5 0 t= ' r c, p '�.�E' � W �bA o �'a 9 ��•o ;� cu y • • • • • ( 1r • • ( , • � � , • • 2 cnso)r ="ay.t--Ydfoxa RIg o oozo-ces(sos) t�rnoanss�+aa 3saax[ra >Mcii'-os lore cw+yan'mw+� 9OK6 VD WsRO 5-1-S - _ zip y°y F N MOS N 19—f sooz6Zam( Mda�oW �EE $ W MM • '3NI 'Si31iIHO HF/ 09ZZl mH'O'd orn�mMvupp OIS jb3m c4e W W r—aLmlit r..� N311V+OWNS vry•xosenvx xxvw ; $°�� x N (las gmz) A.oz-a 3TtlJs saoRenalg ioua;xg a LLL LM5 a : 9 � a 6, v a W o u G7r v a xa J o O W u D ._ t R vQ — N F N a x 0 70 pap z o b0 o �6 B x M w z I � O co I o EV I d I 3 _ I I Idim, — ` b Q n 10 I 5 x :c I " a C i $ c° m ca w 4 a r01�.�en alsm :,ON l73IONd ai p�8 lanwem*aoomw � E 1 aoroces csoa> t=?warts B -Id 35oaxna ® 9OK6YJ'&!govmlws fAOZ6Z�[ $LYQAd 3N 5133iHad1We Od Fi�PY yif �] N M O1� N I =�� r gra i LFioiry N311V+O NV88 vry`NOsmva XHVw (iaY LlxLi) dY,Ob-.L y p g_p N (7�9Pro7J AAZ•.L 37VS5 MA SU014UAjaIOLS@}Xa TTi IMES c ,] 111 awa[>•v�r•p�v a�mnryv mow sw.ry>sv 9 O it p"ap V a C. cu m e a G Q O Q cn o. 3a O 0 9 . ® w "s v Go �u -0 0 E a u v x u g a•° . is a J9 z -(d Or N V pp Dr ho I y$ a � z0 IJ tl ( U seesas - 1f61L�'" LIISM OXY IJH(08d wrawawmro+m,<t :..•� � a: e oozo-c6s(sos) Pa7Pa4nS 9u.-,U Madand -n�ii�-�s ��se awses�gayrs gom voodngp B.-I-S' I`...i.r.n;,e..»„�s.., �os•awa��w � 60oZ'6Z aim[ 3LtlQ IA71dNMI 9F F =pn w • _ 'ONI 'S1O311H36V OULHold {� I A {� OiV N I H � 711 uaM*Dms Dmy� �:I �I w0 r rAyux I /�/, �•�� 5. x N N3lld+aN'dN8 vrv`xosmtlxxxtlw cru=�v.00r.� �py 3.2 cn c g,,,,,a az � lilt a a lTnq -z=jam 4mgprxv a7ap=V a Ptvv 24upmv 434PRV $, I y s a m� C O y In U b In � 5 5 x a i a I v � a O =04xz° _ E fi � I u ,a U r-.-. E •a E � a QE 6"E Yt a • a a � x a I� iaroa�4�eeo.nw y i alsm :,ON 1790ad Eq '�•°6'•°Q0�"T !re•u��4 f�ll!w9�s9Nd 3SOdalld 6� 9 €€ mrum�mq OOZRf65(S08) :noii.�'os s+3r @m° °�wou 90VE6 YJ'^d+!40+!�I®8 600L'6L—F -MYC IaW }} • _ SNI '51�311H�ad 1$ 5 w� N M O iV N I H ��wmols :� a . xN N3T[V+GNV89 vry•Nosnnva xum F= 0-9EZV).�oz=.i �vx a gig ° suonoos 2tuT=la s ; ;g ;32*PZva=r� a=o v 4=Wsrymv va{pw plinq 1 y ` rl rl cn �i_PPR r ., :1—J 79 ' 8 Fs g o a4 D 8 c V' i. .